UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2004

Commission File Number 000-13789

NASTECH PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY INC.

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (425) 908-3600

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:

NASTECH PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Items 1, 3 and 5 of PART II have not been included as they are not applicable.

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1 – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NASTECH PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

2

NASTECH PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

3

NASTECH PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

4

NASTECH PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

5

NASTECH PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Note 1 – General

     The accompanying unaudited financial information should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements, including the notes thereto, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003, included in the Company’s 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2004. The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of Nastech Pharmaceutical Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, Atossa HealthCare Inc (collectively, “the Company”). All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

     The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. The information furnished in this report reflects all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring accruals), which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods. The results of operations for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results for a full year or for any future period.

     Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2003 information to conform to the current year presentation.

Stock-based compensation

     The Company accounts for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method in accordance with APB No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” Effective July 1, 1996, the Company adopted the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, which requires the disclosure of pro forma net income and earnings per share as if the fair value-based method in measuring compensation expense was adopted as of the beginning of fiscal 1996.

     The per share weighted average fair value of stock options granted during the three months ended June 30, 2004, and 2003 was $8.26, and $7.03, respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 was $7.54 and $5.98, respectively, on the date of grant using the Black Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

     Had compensation cost been determined based on the fair value at the grant date for our stock options under SFAS No. 123, net income (loss) would have been reported as the pro forma amounts indicated below:

6

     Note 2 – Business

     The Company is an emerging pharmaceutical company developing products based on applying proprietary drug delivery technologies, with approximately 200 patents and applications filed. The Company is developing molecular biology-based technologies for delivering both small and large molecule drugs by nasal administration. The Company’s intranasal drug delivery technology may lead to greater drug efficacy, speed of action, safety, and/or patient compliance. The Company is developing a diverse product portfolio across multiple therapeutic areas, including products targeted for the treatment of sexual dysfunction, obesity, pain management, osteoporosis and multiple sclerosis.

     The Company is building a pharmaceutical company leveraging its unique drug delivery capabilities and technologies as the means to develop commercial products – initially with partners, then on the Company’s own. The key elements of the Company’s business model are to:

•		develop proprietary active delivery molecules from its tight junction and siRNA technologies;
•		focus on molecules where its technologies will offer significant clinical advantages;
•		conduct preclinical, clinical and manufacturing steps to generate validated clinical leads and products;
•		partner to complete or assist the Company to complete development and commercialization; and
•		provide turn-key commercial manufacturing of nasal delivery products.

     The Company is a leader in molecular-biology based drug delivery, which involves the pharmaceutical manipulation of “tight junctions.” Tight junctions are the cell-to-cell connections that comprise various tissues of the body and that regulate the transport and passage of therapeutic drugs across these natural barriers. The Company also has expertise in formulation science, a systematic approach to drug development using biophysics, physical chemistry and pharmacology to maximize therapeutic efficacy and safety, which sometimes involves a change in route of administration. The Company’s drug delivery technology is essential in designing an optimized, customizable dosage form and in delivering proteins and large molecule drugs that can currently only be delivered by injection or other non-optimized routes.

     The Company’s core technical competency in molecular-biology based drug delivery involves the research, development and manufacture of nasally administered prescription pharmaceuticals. The Company investigates the commercial weaknesses of pharmaceutical products currently available in oral, injectable or other dosage forms, and determines the advantages an alternative drug delivery system, such as intranasal, would have for the same drug in the market place. For example, while the oral route of drug delivery is the most popular and least expensive method of delivery, gastrointestinal and liver metabolism can reduce an oral drug’s effectiveness. Generally, a nasal delivery system will provide faster absorption into the blood stream than an oral product, thereby resulting in faster onset of action. Other advantages of this therapy may include lower drug doses, fewer side effects, greater safety and efficacy, greater convenience to the patient, better patient compliance of prescribed drug therapy and lower overall health care costs for the patient when compared to established methods of delivery.

     The Company’s current business strategy seeks to broaden applications of its commitment to tight junction technology and formulation science, allowing drugs to be safer and more effective in patient treatment, with particular emphasis on the applications for nasal drug delivery.

     As of June 30, 2004, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $70 million and expects additional operating losses in the foreseeable future as it continues its research and development activities. The Company has funded its operating losses primarily through the sale of common stock in the public markets and in private placements and also through revenue provided by its collaborative partners.

     The Company faces certain risks and uncertainties regarding its ability to generate positive operating cash flow and profits. These risks include, but are not limited to, its ability to obtain additional

7

capital, negotiate or maintain successful collaborative arrangements, protect its patents and proprietary technology, overcome uncertainties regarding its technologies, competition and technological change, obtain government approval for products and attract and retain key officers and employees.

Note 3 – Net Loss per Common Share

     Basic and diluted net loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the periods. The effect of employee stock options and warrants was included in the net income per share calculation for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2003. The effect of employee stock options and warrants totaling approximately 4.5 million shares at June 30, 2004 was not included in the net loss per share calculation for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 as the effect would have been antidilutive. Employee stock options and warrants totaled approximately 4.5 million and 3.5 million shares at June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. For the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2003, approximately 1.7 million and 1.8 million options, respectively, were excluded from fully diluted weighted average shares outstanding because the exercise price was less than the average market price for the period.

Note 4 – Contractual Agreements

     (a) Questcor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. -— In June 2003, the Company completed the sale of certain assets relating to its Nascobal® brand products, including the Nascobal® (Cyanocobalamin USP) nasal gel, to Questcor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Questcor”). The Company filed a New Drug Application of a nasal spray product configuration of Nascobal® in the fourth quarter of 2003 and will continue to prosecute the pending U.S. patents for the Nascobal® nasal spray product on behalf of Questcor.

     Under the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, between the Company and Questcor, Questcor paid the Company $9.0 million at closing, $3.0 million on September 30, 2003 and approximately $2.2 million on December 31, 2003. Questcor has also agreed to make payments of: (i) $2.0 million contingent upon FDA approval of a New Drug Application for the Nascobal® nasal spray product; and (ii) $2.0 million contingent upon issuance of a U.S. patent for the Nascobal® nasal spray product.

     In connection with the sale, Questcor and the Company entered into a security agreement (the “Security Agreement”) pursuant to which Questcor granted Nastech a security interest in all the assets related to the Nascobal® (Cyanocobalamin USP) nasal gel acquired by Questcor. In the period ended June 30, 2003, the Company recognized a gain of $4,236,000 on the sale of the assets. The gain was calculated as $14.0 million in non-contingent proceeds, less the net book value of the assets of $8.1 million, less costs and fees. At the time of the sale, approximately $1.0 million of the gain relating to the fair value of work to be completed on the filing of the NDA for the Nascobal® nasal spray product was deferred and was recognized later in 2003 as license and research fee revenue.

     Under the terms of a supply agreement between the parties, subject to certain limitations, the Company is obligated to manufacture and supply all of Questcor’s requirements and Questcor is obligated to purchase from the Company all of its requirements, for the Nascobal® nasal gel and, upon FDA approval, the Nascobal® nasal spray. During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004, the Company recognized zero and $120,000, respectively, of product revenue related to the supply agreement. During the three months ended June 30, 2004, we manufactured an order of Nascobal® gel for Questcor which will be shipped during the third quarter.

     (b) Pharmacia & Upjohn Company — On January 24, 2003, the Company entered into a divestiture agreement (the “Divestiture Agreement”) with Pharmacia & Upjohn Company (“Pharmacia”), under which the Company reacquired all rights to the intranasal apomorphine product that was the subject of the collaboration and license agreement that the Company and Pharmacia entered into in February 2002 (the “Pharmacia Agreement”). Upon the signing of the Divestiture Agreement in January 2003, Pharmacia made a cash payment to the Company of $13.5 million consisting of a $6.0 million divestiture payment, $7.0 million in research and development funds and $500,000 for reimbursement of expenses of the divestiture transaction. During the six months ended June 30, 2003, the Company recognized $1.0 million

8

in license and research fees and $500,000 of legal expense reimbursement which was recorded as a reduction of general and administrative expenses, relating to the $13.5 million payment.

     Under the terms of the Pharmacia Agreement, Pharmacia had received exclusive, worldwide rights to develop and market intranasal apomorphine for the treatment of male and female sexual dysfunction and had agreed to manage and fund all future development in these indications. The Company received an upfront payment at signing in February 2002 of $3.0 million and an additional payment of $2.0 million for transfer of the apomorphine Investigational New Drug application to Pharmacia in April 2002. The $3.0 million upfront payment and $2.0 million additional payment were being amortized over the estimated development period on a straight-line basis through December 31, 2005. During the three months ended June 30, 2003, the Company recognized $273,000 in license fee revenue related to these payments. In April 2003, the Company recognized all remaining deferred revenue from the license fees due to the termination of the Pharmacia Agreement.

Note 5 – Notes Payable

     In June 2003, the Company issued a cash secured Revolving Reducing Note to Wells Fargo Bank. Under the terms of the June 2003 note agreement, the Company could draw down up to $7.0 million for a one-year term and fix the interest rate for one, two or three months at a rate of three-quarters percent above LIBOR. If the interest rate and term are not fixed, the interest rate will be 1.5% below prime. Interest accrued on the note is due monthly on the first day of the following month. In December 2003, the Company terminated the June 2003 note agreement and issued a new cash secured Revolving Line of Credit Note to Wells Fargo Bank to allow for borrowings up to $9.0 million through December 31, 2004. Monthly principal payments are no longer required under the new note and the interest rate and monthly interest payments are the same as the original note. The entire balance of the new note is due December 31, 2004. In January 2004, the Revolving Line of Credit Note was amended to incorporate a Letter of Credit Subfeature under which $648,000 of the $9.0 million line of credit is reserved for issuance of a standby letter of credit agreement to the Company’s landlord for its Bothell facility under the terms of its lease for that facility. On March 26, 2004, the Company drew down approximately $2.2 million on the new note which represented all remaining available funds. As of June 30, 2004, the balance on the new note was $8,352,000 and the interest rate was 2.0% per annum.

Note 6 – Capital Lease Obligation

     In April 2002, the Company entered into a capital lease agreement with GE Capital Corporation (the “GE Lease”) to fund the Company’s fixed asset purchases. In December 2003, the GE Lease was amended to allow the Company to finance up to $2.75 million in additional purchases through December 31, 2004. In March 2004, the Company drew down approximately $333,000 on the GE Lease at an interest rate of 8.3%. In June 2004, the Company drew down approximately $706,000 on the GE Lease at an interest rate of 9.2%. As of June 30, 2004, the Company has approximately $1,268,000 which it may draw down through December 31, 2004.

Note 7 – Related Party Transactions

     The Company paid certain monthly expenses incurred by a company that is owned primarily by its Chief Executive Officer in exchange for use of this company’s laboratory facility for certain research and development work. Under this arrangement, during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004, the Company paid rent of zero and $1,500, respectively, and $9,200 and $18,400 during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2003, respectively. In January 2004, the Company entered into an agreement to sublet this facility to a third party through May 31, 2004, the remaining term of the lease. At June 30, 2004 there are no further obligations of the Company relating to this transaction.

     In October 2003, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with a member of the Company’s Board of Directors, for strategic pharmaceutical consulting services. During the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 the board member was paid $15,000 and $60,000, respectively. The agreement terminated on April 30, 2004.

9

Note 8 – Stockholders’ Equity

     (a) Common Stock Offering — On June 25, 2004 the Company completed the sale of an aggregate of 1,136,364 shares of its common stock, par value $0.006 per share (the “Common Stock”), and warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 511,364 shares of Common Stock (the “Warrants”). The sale was made pursuant to an effective shelf registration statement and a Securities Purchase Agreement. The offering resulted in gross proceeds to the Company, prior to the deduction of fees and commissions, of $12,500,000. The net proceeds from the offering will be used by the Company for general corporate purposes. At June 30, 2004 the amount remaining available on the shelf registration statement is approximately $10.1 million.

     The Warrants are exercisable for up to an aggregate of 511,364 shares of Common Stock, at an exercise price per share of $14.40, subject to adjustment for stock splits, stock dividends, distributions, issuance of securities at a price below the exercise price of the warrants, business combinations and similar transactions and provision for cashless exercise of the Warrants in certain circumstances. The Warrants are exercisable beginning six months from the date of issuance until the fifth anniversary of the date of issuance, subject to certain price protection and anti-dilution provisions.

     (b) Restricted Stock Grants — In June 2004 our 2004 Stock Incentive Plan was approved by our shareholders and restricted stock grants were issued to certain directors and employees. Non-cash compensation expense is being recognized over the applicable vesting periods of one to three years of the restricted shares. Approximately 84,000 shares of restricted stock were granted in June 2004. We accrued a liability of approximately $946,000 in deferred compensation in June 2004 related to these grants, and approximately $43,000 was expensed during the three months ended June 30, 2004.

10

ITEM 2 – MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

Statements contained herein that are not historical fact may be forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties. There are a number of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or suggested in any forward-looking statement made by us. These factors include, but are not limited to: (i) our ability to obtain additional funding; (ii) our ability to attract and/or maintain manufacturing, research, development and commercialization partners; (iii) our and/or a partner’s ability to successfully complete product research and development, including pre-clinical and clinical studies and commercialization; (iv) our and/or a partner’s ability to obtain required governmental approvals, including product and patent approvals; and (v) our and/or a partner’s ability to develop and commercialize products that can compete favorably with those of competitors. In addition, significant fluctuations in quarterly results may occur as a result of the timing of milestone payments, the recognition of revenue from milestone payments and other sources not related to product sales to third parties, and the timing of costs and expenses related to the our research and development programs. Additional factors that would cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or suggested in any forward-looking statements are contained in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including those factors discussed under the caption “Risk Factors” in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, which we urge investors to consider. We undertake no obligation to publicly release revisions in such forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrences of unanticipated events or circumstances, except as otherwise required by securities and other applicable laws.

     Nastech Pharmaceutical Company Inc. is an emerging pharmaceutical company developing products based on applying proprietary drug delivery technologies, with approximately 200 patents and applications filed. We are developing molecular biology-based technologies for delivering both small and large molecule drugs by nasal administration. Our intranasal drug delivery technology may lead to greater drug efficacy, speed of action, safety, and/or patient compliance. We are developing a diverse product portfolio across multiple therapeutic areas, including products targeted for the treatment of sexual dysfunction, obesity, pain management, osteoporosis and multiple sclerosis.

     We are building a pharmaceutical company leveraging our unique drug delivery capabilities and technologies as the means to develop commercial products – initially with partners, then on our own. The key elements of our business model are to:

•		develop proprietary active delivery molecules from our tight junction and siRNA technologies;
•		focus on molecules where our technologies will offer significant clinical advantages;
•		conduct preclinical, clinical and manufacturing steps to generate validated clinical leads and products;
•		partner to complete or assist us to complete development and commercialization; and
•		provide turn-key commercial manufacturing of nasal delivery products.

     We are a leader in molecular-biology based drug delivery, which involves the pharmaceutical manipulation of “tight junctions”. Tight junctions are the cell-to-cell connections that comprise various tissues of the body and that regulate the transport and passage of therapeutic drugs across these natural barriers. We also have expertise in formulation science, a systematic approach to drug development using biophysics, physical chemistry and pharmacology to maximize therapeutic efficacy and safety, which sometimes involves a change in route of administration. Our drug delivery technology is essential in designing an optimized, customizable dosage form and in delivering proteins and large molecule drugs that can currently only be delivered by injection or other non-optimized routes.

11

     Our core technical competency in molecular-biology based drug delivery involves the research, development and manufacture of nasally administered prescription pharmaceuticals. We investigate the commercial weaknesses of pharmaceutical products currently available in oral, injectable or other dosage forms, and we determine the advantages an alternative drug delivery system, such as intranasal, would have for the same drug in the market place. For example, while the oral route of drug delivery is the most popular and least expensive method of delivery, gastrointestinal and liver metabolism can reduce an oral drug’s effectiveness. Generally, a nasal delivery system will provide faster absorption into the blood stream than an oral product thereby resulting in faster onset of action. Other advantages of this therapy may include lower drug doses, fewer side effects, greater safety and efficacy, greater convenience to the patient, better patient compliance of prescribed drug therapy and lower overall health care costs for the patient when compared to established methods of delivery.

     Our current business strategy seeks to broaden applications of our commitment to tight junction technology and formulation science, allowing drugs to be safer and more effective in patient treatment, with particular emphasis on the applications for nasal drug delivery.

     We have an accumulated deficit of $70 million and expect additional operating losses in the foreseeable future as we continue our research and development activities. Our development efforts and the future revenues from sales of these products are expected to generate contract research revenues, milestone payments, license fees, royalties and manufactured product sales for us. As of June 30, 2004, we had approximately $26 million in cash, cash equivalents and short–term investments. We believe that our current cash position provides us with adequate working capital through at least June 30, 2005. In addition, we are planning to enter into various collaborations to accelerate our R&D programs, and to the extent these collaborations do not occur, we may be required to reduce our research and development activities or raise additional funds from new investors or in the public markets.

     On December 18, 2003, we filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with the SEC, pursuant to which we may issue common stock and warrants from time to time, up to an aggregate of $30.0 million. The terms of any future offering would be established at the time of the offering. The shelf registration statement was declared effective by the SEC on January 14, 2004. A shelf registration statement enables us to raise funds from the offering of any individual security covered by the shelf registration statement, as well as any combination thereof, from time to time and through one or more methods of distribution, subject to market conditions and our capital needs. On June 25, 2004 the Company completed the sale of an aggregate of 1,136,364 shares of its common stock, par value $0.006 per share (the “Common Stock”), and warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 511,364 shares of Common Stock (the “Warrants”). The sale was made pursuant to the above-noted effective shelf registration statement and a Securities Purchase Agreement. The offering resulted in gross proceeds to the Company, prior to the deduction of fees and commissions, of $12,500,000. The net proceeds from the offering will be used by the Company for general corporate purposes. At June 30, 2004, the amount remaining available on the shelf registration statement was approximately $10.1 million.

Critical Accounting Estimates

     We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. As such, we are required to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that we believe are reasonable based upon the information available. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the periods presented. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates under different assumptions and conditions. We believe that the following discussion addresses our most critical accounting estimates which are those that are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and which require our most difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. We also have other policies that we consider key accounting policies; however, these policies do not meet the definition of critical accounting estimates, because they do not generally require us to make estimates or judgments which are difficult or subjective.

12

Revenue Recognition

     Most of our revenues are generated from complex research and licensing arrangements. These research and licensing arrangements may include upfront non-refundable payments, milestone payments, royalties, revenue from R&D services performed and product sales revenue.

     Upfront non-refundable fees received under research collaboration agreements are generally recognized over the term of the related research period. Changes in estimated development time or costs of development are recognized prospectively. Any such changes could impact future revenue recognition depending on whether estimated time or costs increase or decrease. Upfront non-refundable fees received under license agreements, which do not require any further research and development activities or other continuing involvement on our part are recognized upon receipt.

     Development milestone payments are typically progress payments for specific events of development, such as completion of preclinical or clinical activities, regulatory submission or approval, or manufacturing objectives prior to commercialization of a product. These milestone payments are generally non-refundable and recognized as revenue based on the actual product research and development costs incurred to date as a fraction of the estimated total of such costs to be incurred over the development period.

     Royalty revenue is generally recognized at the time of product sale by the licensee.

     Revenue from R&D services performed is generally services performed under collaboration agreements and is recognized at the time the services are performed.

     Product sales revenue is recognized at the time the manufactured goods are shipped to the purchaser and title has transferred.

Stock-based compensation

     We apply Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 (“APB 25”), Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations in accounting for our stock-based employee compensation plans, rather than the alternative fair value accounting method provided for under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, (“SFAS 123”). In Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, we provide pro-forma disclosures in accordance with SFAS 123 and related pronouncements. Under APB 25, compensation expense is recorded on the date of grant of an option to an employee or member of the Board of Directors only if the fair market value of the underlying stock at the time of grant exceeds the exercise price. In the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, our stock option grants were based on the closing price of our stock on the date of grant. In addition, we have granted options to certain outside consultants, which are required to be measured at fair value and recognized as compensation expense in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. We apply the Black-Scholes option-pricing model for estimating the fair value of options, which involves a number of judgments and variables including estimates of the life of the options and expected volatility which are subject to significant change. A change in the fair value estimate could have a significant effect on the amount of compensation expense calculated.

     In June 2004, our 2004 Stock Incentive Plan was approved by our shareholders and restricted stock grants were issued to certain directors and employees. Non-cash compensation expense is being recognized over the applicable vesting periods of one to three years of the restricted shares.

Income Taxes

     A critical estimate is the full valuation allowance for deferred taxes that was recorded based on the uncertainty that such tax benefits will be realized in future periods. To the extent we achieve profitability such deferred tax allowance would be reversed at that time.

13

Results of Operations

Revenue and cost of revenue

     Revenue amount and percentage changes as compared to the same periods in the prior year are as follows (dollar amounts are presented in thousands):

     License and research fees were significantly higher in 2003 as compared to 2004, because of fees received by us in 2003 as a result of the divestiture agreement with Pharmacia under which we reacquired all rights to the intranasal apomorphine product.

     The following table sets forth information on product revenue, cost of product revenue and cost of product revenue as a percentage of product revenue for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 (dollar amounts are presented in thousands):

     Product revenue consists of sales of Nascobal® nasal gel. During the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2003, we earned revenue from our own direct sales of Nascobal® nasal gel to drug wholesalers using a contract sales organization and contract distributor. On June 17, 2003, we completed the sale of certain assets relating to our Nascobal® brand products to Questcor. In connection with the sale, we entered into a supply agreement with Questcor under which Questcor is obligated to purchase from us all of its requirements for the Nascobal® nasal gel and, upon FDA approval, the Nascobal® nasal spray. During the six-month period ended June 30, 2004, we earned manufacturing revenue under the supply agreement. As a result of the change from recognizing revenue from our own direct sales of Nascobal® in 2003 to earning manufacturing revenue under the supply agreement in 2004, product revenue decreased significantly. In addition, gross profit margins in 2004 were derived from manufacturing revenue as compared to the higher margins earned in 2003 from our own direct sales to drug wholesalers. During the three months ended June 30, 2004, we manufactured an order of Nascobal® gel for Questcor which will be shipped during the third quarter. In the future, we expect to receive manufacturing revenue under the supply agreement.

Research and development

     Research and development (“R&D”) expense consists primarily of salaries and other R&D personnel-related expenses, costs of clinical trials, consulting and other outside services, laboratory supplies, facilities costs, FDA filing fees and other R&D costs. R&D expense by project as a percentage of total R&D expense and total R&D expense as compared to the same periods in the prior year are as follows (dollar amounts are presented in thousands):

14

     The increase in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 over the same periods in 2003 resulted primarily from the following costs:

•		Personnel–related expenses increased 48% to $2.2 million and 42% to $4.3 million, respectively, due to an increase in staffing our research and development personnel in support of our research and development programs.
•		Costs of clinical trials, consulting, outside services and laboratory supplies increased 6% to $1.9 million and 52% to $4.7 million, respectively, due primarily to clinical trials performed for our PYY, calcitonin, RNAi and apomorphine products under development.
•		Facilities costs increased 26% to $0.9 million and 19% to $1.7 million, respectively, due to rent and related expenses on additional space leased in the Bothell facility.
•		R&D administrative expenses increased 79% to $0.2 million and 218% to $0.4 million, respectively, due primarily to patent royalty fees incurred.

     We expect an increase in research and development costs in the foreseeable future as we continue our research and development activities. These expenditures are subject to many uncertainties in timing and cost to completion. We test compounds in numerous preclinical studies for safety, toxicology and efficacy. We then conduct early stage clinical trials for drug candidates. As we obtain results from trials, we may elect to discontinue or delay clinical trials for certain products in order to focus our resources on more promising products. Completion of clinical trials by us and our collaboration partners may take several years or more, but the length of time generally varies substantially according to the type, complexity, novelty and intended use of a drug candidate. The cost of clinical trials may vary significantly over the life of a project as a result of differences arising during clinical development, including, among others:

•		the number of sites included in the clinical trials;
•		the length of time required to enroll suitable patient subjects;
•		the number of participants in the trials;
•		the duration of participant follow-up that seems appropriate in view of results; and
•		the number and complexity of safety and efficacy parameters monitored during the study.

     None of our current pipeline of drug candidates has received FDA or foreign regulatory marketing approval. In order to achieve marketing approval, the FDA or foreign regulatory agencies must conclude that our and our collaboration partners’ clinical data establishes the safety and efficacy of our drug candidates. Furthermore, our strategy includes entering into collaborations with third parties to participate in the development and commercialization of our products. In the event that third parties have control over the development process for a product, the estimated completion date would largely be under control of that third party rather than under our control. We cannot forecast with any degree of certainty how such collaboration arrangements will affect our development plans or capital requirements.

15

     As a result of the uncertainties discussed above, we are unable to determine the duration and completion costs of our research and development projects or when and to what extent we will receive cash inflows from the commercialization and sale of a product.

Sales and marketing

     Sales and marketing expense consists primarily of salaries and other personnel-related expenses, consulting, sales materials, trade shows, advertising, and in the first six months of 2003 costs of using a contract sales organization and contract distributor for Nascobal® nasal gel. Total sales and marketing expense and dollar and percentage changes as compared to the same periods in the prior year are as follows (dollar amounts are presented in thousands):

     The decreases in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 over the same periods in 2003 are due to reduced sales and marketing expenses following the sale of certain assets relating to our Nascobal® brand products which occurred in June 2003. In the first six months of 2003, we incurred costs associated with marketing programs to support our own direct sales of Nascobal® nasal gel. After the sale of certain assets relating to our Nascobal® brand products in June 2003, we no longer received revenue from our own direct sales of Nascobal® and this level of spending on sales and marketing was no longer necessary. We expect sales and marketing costs, which includes business development staff and activities, to increase somewhat in the foreseeable future to support activities associated with partnering our drug candidates.

General and administrative

     General and administrative expense consists primarily of salaries and other personnel-related expenses to support our R&D and corporate activities, amortization of non-cash deferred stock option and restricted stock compensation, professional fees such as accounting and legal, corporate insurance, amortization of intangibles and facilities costs. Total general and administrative expense and dollar and percentage changes as compared to the same periods in the prior year are as follows (dollar amounts are presented in thousands):

     The increase in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 over the same periods in 2003 resulted primarily from the following:

•		Costs of legal fees, accounting fees, corporate insurance and other administrative costs increased $0.3 million to $0.7 million and $0.8 million to $1.8 million, respectively. These increases are primarily due to increases in recruiting, legal fees, non-cash compensation expenses related to restricted stock grants and consulting services. In addition, the prior year periods included a $500,000 expense reduction related to the reimbursement of legal expenses received as part of the divestiture agreement with Pharmacia.
•		Amortization of intangibles decreased $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively, to zero. In

16

2003 and prior periods we recorded amortization of intangibles expense on the Nascobal® related assets. In June 2003, we completed the sale of certain assets relating to our Nascobal® brand products to Questcor, at which time the amortization ceased.

     We expect general and administrative expenses to remain stable in the foreseeable future in support of our research and development and corporate activities.

Interest Income

     The following table sets forth information on interest income, average funds available for investment and average interest rate earned for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 (dollar amounts are presented in thousands):

     The changes in interest income in the periods ended June 30, 2004 over the same periods in 2003 were due to lower average interest rates earned due to lower prevailing market interest rates, offset by higher average balances available for investment.

Interest Expense

     We incur interest expense on our capital leases and our notes payable. The following table sets forth information on interest expense, average borrowings and average interest rate incurred for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 (dollar amounts are presented in thousands):

     The decrease in interest expense in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 over the same periods in 2003 were due primarily to decreases in the average interest rate. In the three- and six- month periods ended June 30, 2004, average borrowings under the Wells Fargo note were approximately $8,350,000 and $7,400,000, respectively, at rates ranging up to 2%, and average borrowings under the GE Capital leases were approximately $2,650,000 and 2,600,000, respectively, at rates ranging from 8.3% to 9.96%. In the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2003, average borrowings under the Schwarz Pharma and Wells Fargo notes were approximately $6,900,000 and $7,000,000, respectively, at interest rates ranging from 1.5% to 7.5%, and average borrowings under the GE Capital leases were approximately $900,000 and $700,000, respectively, at interest rates ranging from 8.35% to 9.96%.

     In June 2003, we paid off the note payable to Schwarz Pharma in connection with our sale of certain assets of our Nascobal® brand products to Questcor. In June 2003, we entered into a note payable with Wells Fargo bank at a rate of LIBOR plus 0.75%. As of June 30, 2004, the balance on the note payable with Wells Fargo was $8,352,000 and the interest rate was 2.0% per annum.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Requirements

17

     We have financed our operations primarily through the sale of common stock and warrants in private placements and in the public markets, revenues received from our collaborative partners, equipment financing facilities and notes payable. As of June 30, 2004, we had approximately $26 million in cash, cash-equivalents and short-term investments.

     We have an accumulated deficit of $70 million and expect additional operating losses in the foreseeable future as we continue our research and development activities. Our development efforts and the future revenues from sales of these products are expected to generate contract research revenues, milestone payments, license fees, royalties and manufactured product sales for us. We believe that our current cash position provides us with adequate working capital through at least June 30, 2005. In addition, we are planning to enter into various collaborations to accelerate our R&D programs, and to the extent these collaborations do not occur, we may be required to reduce our research and development activities or raise additional funds from new investors or in the public markets.

     On December 18, 2003, we filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with the SEC, pursuant to which we may issue common stock and warrants from time to time, up to an aggregate of $30.0 million. The terms of any future offering would be established at the time of the offering. The shelf registration statement was declared effective by the SEC on January 14, 2004. A shelf registration statement enables us to raise funds from the offering of any individual security covered by the shelf registration statement, as well as any combination thereof, from time to time and through one or more methods of distribution, subject to market conditions and our capital needs. On June 25, 2004 the Company completed the sale of an aggregate of 1,136,364 shares of our common stock, par value $0.006 per share (the “Common Stock”), and warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 511,364 shares of Common Stock (the “Warrants”). The sale was made pursuant to the above-noted effective shelf registration statement and a Securities Purchase Agreement. The offering resulted in gross proceeds to the Company, prior to the deduction of fees and commissions, of $12,500,000. The net proceeds from the offering will be used by the Company for general corporate purposes. At June 30, 2004, the amount remaining available on the shelf registration statement was approximately $10.1 million.

Sources and Uses of Cash

     Total sources and uses of cash for the three- and six-month periods ending June 30, 2004 and 2003 are as follows (dollar amounts presented in thousands):

     Our operating activities used cash of $6.3 million in the three months ended June 30, 2004, compared to $4.5 million in the same period in 2003, and used cash of $14.3 million in the first six months of 2004 compared to providing cash of $4.5 million in the first six months of 2003. Cash used in operating activities relates primarily to funding net losses and changes in deferred revenue from collaborators, partially offset by non-cash charges related to depreciation and amortization of property and equipment, deferred stock compensation and intangibles. In the six months ended June 30, 2003, we received a payment of $13.5 million from Pharmacia related to the divestiture agreement. We expect to use cash for operating activities in the foreseeable future as we continue our research and development activities.

18

     Our investing activities used cash of $2.0 million in the three months ended June 30, 2004, compared to cash provided of $2.4 million in the same period in 2003, and used cash of $2.4 million in the first six months of 2004, compared to cash provided of $1.7 million in the first six months of 2003. The 2003 periods included $9.0 million relating to the asset purchase agreement for the sale of Nascobal® to Questcor. Changes in cash from investing activities are due primarily to purchases of short-term investments net of maturities and purchases of equipment. We expect to continue to make significant investments in our research and development infrastructure, including the purchase of equipment to support our research and development activities.

     Our financing activities provided cash of $13.4 million in the three months ended June 30, 2004, compared to $1.8 million in the same period in 2003, and provided $16.1 million in the first six months of 2004, compared to $1.4 million in the first six months of 2003. Changes in cash from financing activities are primarily due to issuance of common stock and warrants, issuance of notes payable and proceeds from equipment financing facilities. We finance equipment purchases through equipment financing facilities, such as capital leases and our Revolving Line of Credit. During the six months ended June 30, 2004, we drew down approximately $2.3 million on our Revolving Line of Credit and $1.0 million on a capital lease facility. On December 18, 2003, we filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with the SEC, pursuant to which we may issue common stock and warrants from time to time, up to an aggregate of $30.0 million. The shelf registration statement was declared effective by the SEC on January 14, 2004. On June 25, 2004 we completed the sale of an aggregate of 1,136,364 shares of its common stock, par value $0.006 per share (the “Common Stock”), and warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 511,364 shares of Common Stock (the “Warrants”). The sale was made pursuant to the above-noted effective shelf registration statement and a Securities Purchase Agreement. The offering resulted in gross proceeds to the Company, prior to the deduction of fees and commissions, of $12,500,000. The net proceeds from the offering will be used by the Company for general corporate purposes. At June 30, 2004, the amount remaining available on the shelf registration statement was approximately $10.1 million.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

     As of June 30, 2004, we did not have any significant off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of SEC Regulation S-K.

19

ITEM 3 – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

     Our exposure to market rate risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our investment of cash in excess of near term requirements. We have a prescribed methodology whereby we invest our excess cash in debt instruments of U.S. government agencies and high quality corporate issuers (Standard & Poor’s double “AA” rating and higher). To mitigate market risk, securities have a maturity date within 15 months, no category of issue can exceed 50% of the portfolio, and holdings of any one issuer excluding the U.S. government do not exceed 20% of the portfolio. Periodically, the portfolio is reviewed and adjusted if the credit rating of a security held has deteriorated. We do not utilize derivative financial instruments.

ITEM 4 – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

     (a) As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of senior management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective for gathering, analyzing and disclosing the information that the Company is required to disclose in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

     (b) There have been no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting or in other factors during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting subsequent to the date the Company carried out its most recent evaluation.

20

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 2 – CHANGES IN SECURITIES, USE OF PROCEEDS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

     In June 2004, we granted a total of 84,360 restricted shares of our common stock to certain of our non-employee directors, officers and employees pursuant to our 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, which was adopted by our board of directors on April 14, 2004 and approved by our stockholders on June 9, 2004. The issuance of the restricted shares was exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”), because the issuance did not constitute a sale and by virtue of Section 4(2) of the Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder. No underwriters were used in connection with the delivery of such restricted shares.

ITEM 4 – SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

     On June 9, 2004, our stockholders approved the following proposals at its Annual Meeting of Stockholders:

1)

The election of the following nine (9) directors, each to hold office for a term of one (1) year or until their respective successors have been duly elected or appointed:

2)

The appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2004:

3)

The approval of our 2004 Stock Incentive Plan:

21

ITEM 6 – EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a) Exhibits

The following documents are filed as part of this report:

(b) Reports on Form 8-K

(1)		We filed a Current Report on Form 8-K, dated April 21, 2004, in which we reported under Item 5 the nomination of Myron Z. Holubiak, Leslie D. Michelson, and Gerald T. Stanewick to our Board of Directors.
(2)		We filed a Current Report on Form 8-K, dated May 24, 2004, in which we reported under Item 5 that we acquired exclusive rights to the Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA Peptide YY patent, patent applications and proprietary know-how estate to support ongoing commercialization efforts of our investigational PYY 3-36 Nasal Spray for obesity.
(3)		We filed a Current Report on Form 8-K, dated June 25, 2004, in which we reported under Item 5 that on June 24, 2004 we completed the sale of an aggregate of 1,136,364 shares of our common stock, par value $0.006 per share, and warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 511,364 shares of our common stock.
(4)		We filed a Current Report on Form 8-K, dated June 29, 2004, in which we reported under Item 5 Phase 1-C clinical results of PYY3-36 Nasal Spray for obesity.

22

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, duly authorized, in Bothell, State of Washington, on August 4, 2004.

NASTECH PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY INC.

23

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

24