Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Form 10-K

Commission File Number: 1-14094

Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc.

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (248) 358-1100

      Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes þ          No o

      Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.     o

      Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).     Yes þ          No o

      The aggregate market value of the voting stock (common stock, $.01 par value) held by nonaffiliates of the registrant was $78,205,434 on June 30, 2003, the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second quarter, based on the closing sales price of the Common Stock on such date.

      The aggregate number of shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock, $.01 par value, outstanding on March 1, 2004 was 29,023,933.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

      Certain portions of the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting scheduled for May 11, 2004 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.

Table of Contents

MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP, INC.

PART I

Item 1.     Business

The Company

      Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc. (the “Company”) is a Michigan corporation, which was originally incorporated in 1985. The Company was formerly known as Star Holding Company. In November 1995, the Company changed its name and acquired Meadowbrook, Inc. (“Meadowbrook”). Meadowbrook was founded in 1955 as Meadowbrook Insurance Agency and was subsequently incorporated in Michigan in 1965.

      The Company serves as a holding company not only for Meadowbrook but also for Star Insurance Company (“Star”), Savers Property and Casualty Insurance Company (“Savers”) and American Indemnity Insurance Company, Ltd. (“American Indemnity”). Star was formed in 1985 as a subsidiary of Star Holding Company. Star then acquired Savers in 1990, and the Company acquired American Indemnity in 1994.

      Meadowbrook acquired Association Self Insurance Services, Inc. (“ASI”) of Montgomery, Alabama in November 1996. ASI is a full service risk-management operation focused on insurance pools and trust funds whose services include claims, loss control, managed care, and policy issuance. ASI’s operations were consolidated with Meadowbrook’s existing operations in Montgomery, Alabama.

      On July 1, 1997, the Company acquired Crest Financial Corporation (“Crest”), a California-based holding company, which formerly owned Williamsburg National Insurance Company (“Williamsburg”), an insurance carrier, and Crest Financial Services, a risk management services company. Crest provides risk management services primarily to the trucking industry within California. Effective December 31, 1999, the Company reorganized its holding structure, which resulted in Crest contributing Williamsburg to Star.

      On April 30, 1998, the Company acquired the business of Villari & Associates, Inc. and operated the agency as Meadowbrook-Villari Agency. The Meadowbrook-Villari Agency, a Florida-based insurance agency, offered professional liability products and programs, group health and disability, and property and casualty products. Effective July 1, 2001, the Company sold the business of Meadowbrook-Villari Agency. The Company recorded a loss of $1.1 million in conjunction with the sale.

      On July 31, 1998, the Company acquired Florida Preferred Administrators, Inc. (“Florida Preferred”), a third party administrator, and Star acquired Southeastern Holding Corporation, the holding company for an insurance carrier Ameritrust Insurance Corporation (“Ameritrust”), both of which were located in Sarasota, Florida. Southeastern Holding Corporation was dissolved in December 2002 and Ameritrust became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Star. Florida Preferred provides a broad range of risk management services to purchasers of workers’ compensation insurance from Ameritrust.

      On August 6, 1999, the Company acquired the assets of TPA Associates, Inc., all the outstanding stock of TPA Insurance Agency, Inc., and Preferred Insurance Agency, Inc. and approximately 94% of the outstanding stock of Preferred Insurance Company, Ltd. (“PICL”) (collectively, “TPA”). TPA is a program-oriented risk management company that provides risk management services to self-insured clients, creates and manages alternative risk management programs, and performs underwriting, policy issuance and loss control services. In January 2002, the Company purchased the remaining 6% minority interest of PICL for a cost of $288,000.

      Effective January 31, 2002, the Company sold the business of Meadowbrook International, Ltd. This sale resulted in a reduction of annualized reinsurance brokerage commission of approximately $450,000, which did not have a material impact on the Company’s overall results of operations. The Company recorded a gain of approximately $199,000 in conjunction with the sale.

      On September 30, 2003, the Company formed Meadowbrook Capital Trust I, a Delaware trust. The trust issued $10.0 million of mandatorily redeemable trust preferred securities (“TPS”) to a trust formed by an institutional investor.

2

Table of Contents

      At December 31, 2003, Meadowbrook and its subsidiaries employed approximately 673 associates to service the Company’s clients and provide management services to the Insurance Operations as defined below.

Overview

      Since 1976, the Company has specialized in providing alternative risk management solutions for its clients. By forming risk-sharing partnerships, the Company aligns its financial objectives with its clients. By having their capital at risk, the Company’s clients help to avoid adverse selection and share in the underwriting profits and investment income from their risk management plan. According to industry reports, the alternative market accounts for nearly 50% of the U.S. commercial property / casualty marketplace. The current state of the market presents the Company with many opportunities. Higher rates and less capacity are contributing to an environment in which policyholders are seeking alternative ways to secure affordable and stable insurance protection.

      Using the Company’s products and services, small-to-medium sized client groups gain access to more sophisticated risk management techniques previously available only to larger corporations. This enables the client to control insurance costs and turn risk management into a profit center. As a pioneering leader in this under-served market, the Company believes that it is well positioned to provide services to additional client groups that seek more stable alternatives to the purchase of traditional commercial insurance.

      Based upon the particular risk management goals of its clients and its assessment of the opportunity for operating profit, the Company offers solutions on a managed basis, a risk-sharing basis or, in certain circumstances, in response to a specific market opportunity, a fully-insured basis. In a managed program, the Company earns service fee revenue by providing management and other services to a client’s risk-bearing entity, but generally does not share in the operating results. In a risk-sharing program, the Company participates with the client or producing agent in the operating results of the programs through the utilization of a captive, rent-a-captive or similar insured vehicles, which are reinsurance companies and are accounted for under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 113, “Accounting and Reporting for Reinsurance of Short-Duration and Long-Duration Contracts”. In risk-sharing programs, the Company derives revenues from net earned premiums, fee revenue and commissions, and investment income. In addition, the Company may benefit from any margin included in the ceding commissions for services it renders on behalf of the risk-sharing partner for the program. In a fully-insured program, the Company provides commercial insurance coverage and derives revenue from net earned premiums and investment income. Fully-insured programs are developed in response to a specific market opportunity and generally when the Company believes there is potential to subsequently create a risk-sharing program.

      The Company developed a broad range of alternative risk management capabilities and services to design, manage, and service its clients’ risk management needs. These capabilities and services include:

	•	program and product design;
	•	underwriting / risk selection and policy issuance;
	•	sales, marketing and public relations to members of groups;
	•	formation and management of risk-bearing entities, such as mutual insurance companies, captives, rent-a-captives, public entity pools, and risk retention and risk purchasing groups;
	•	claims handling and administration;
	•	loss prevention and control:
	•	reinsurance brokerage;
	•	risk analysis and identification;
	•	actuarial and loss reserve analysis;
	•	information technology and processing;
	•	feasibility studies;

3

Table of Contents

	•	litigation management;
	•	accounting and financial statement preparation;
	•	regulatory compliance; and
	•	audit support.

Company Segments

      The Company earns commissions through the operation of its retail property and casualty insurance agency, which was formed in 1955. The agency has grown to be one of the largest agencies in Michigan and, with acquisitions, has expanded into California. The agency operations primarily produce commercial insurance, as well as personal property, casualty, life and accident and health insurance, with more than fifty insurance carriers.

      In total, the Company’s agency operations generated commissions of $15.0 million, $14.3 million, and $15.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively.

     Specialty Risk Management Operations

      The specialty risk management operations segment focuses on specialty or niche insurance business in which it provides various services and coverages that are tailored to meet specific requirements of defined client groups and their members. This includes, but is not limited to, providing services, such as risk management consulting, claims administration and handling, loss control, and reinsurance brokering, along with various types of property and casualty insurance coverage, including workers’ compensation, commercial multiple peril, general liability, commercial auto liability, and inland marine. Insurance coverage is provided primarily to associations or similar groups of members and to specified classes of business of the Company’s agent-partners. The Company recognizes revenue related to the services and coverages the specialty risk management operations provides within seven categories: net earned premiums, management fees, claims fees, loss control fees, reinsurance brokerage, investment income, and net realized gain (loss) on investments.

      Net earned premiums include the following lines of business:

	•	Workers’ Compensation
	•	Commercial Multiple Peril
	•	General Liability

             — Errors and Omissions

             — Automobile

             — Owners, Landlord and Tenant

	•	Employment Practices Liability
	•	Professional Liability

             — Medical

             — Real Estate Appraisers

             — Pharmacists

	•	Inland Marine
	•	Product Liability
	•	Excess Reinsurance
	•	Commercial Property

4

Table of Contents

     Description of Specialty Risk Management Programs

      Managed Programs: In a managed program, the Company earns service fee revenue by providing management and other services to a client’s risk-bearing entity, but generally does not share in the operating results. The Company believes its managed programs provide a consistent source of revenue, as well as opportunities for revenue growth without a proportionate increase in expenses. Revenue growth may occur through the sale of existing products to additional members of the sponsoring client group, the expansion of coverages and services provided to existing programs and the creation of programs for new client groups with needs that are similar to existing client groups.

      Managed program services for which the Company receives fee-based revenues include program design and development; underwriting; reinsurance brokerage; policy administration; loss prevention and control services; claims administration and handling, and litigation management; information processing and accounting functions; and general management oversight of the program on behalf of the sponsoring client group. The fees received by the Company under its managed programs are generally either a fixed amount or based on a percentage of premium serviced.

      The Company specializes in providing managed programs to public entity associations and currently manages public entity pools and other insurance entities which provide insurance coverage for approximately 1,800 participants, including city, county, township, and village governments in three states. Over the years, the Company has been able to expand the services offered under existing programs, as well as to increase the number of participants in these managed programs.

     Risk- Sharing Programs:

      Client Risk-Sharing. In a client risk-sharing program, the Company and the client both participate in the operating results, through the utilization of a captive, rent-a-captive or retrospectively-rated policy. In many instances, a captive owned by a client reinsures a portion of the risk on a quota-share basis. Both the captive and the rent-a-captive are reinsurance companies and are accounted for under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 113 “Accounting and Reporting for Reinsurance of Short-Duration and Long-Duration Contracts”.

      In addition to premium revenue and investment income from its participation in the operating results, the Company may also be compensated through the receipt of ceding commissions and other fees for policy issuance services and acquisition costs, captive management services, reinsurance brokerage, loss prevention services and claims handling and administrative services. For financial reporting purposes, ceding commissions are treated as a reduction in underwriting expenses.

      The Company’s experience has been that the number of claims and the cost of losses tend to be lower in risk-sharing programs than with traditional forms of insurance. The Company believes that client risk-sharing motivates insureds to focus on loss prevention and loss control measures and adhere to stricter underwriting guidelines.

      Although the structure and nature of each of risk-sharing relationship varies, the chart and description below provides an illustration of the basic elements included in many client risk-sharing programs.

5

Table of Contents

CAPTIVE RISK-SHARING STRUCTURE

(1)	The Company accounts for transactions with these risk-sharing clients as reinsurance under the provisions of SFAS No. 113 “Accounting and Reporting for Reinsurance of Short-Duration and Long-Duration Contracts”.

      The Company assists the client with the formation of the captive, which is capitalized by contributions from the producers, or an association, or group of policyholders in exchange for shares of the captive. The captive is generally managed for a fee by an offshore subsidiary of the Company. The Company works with the client to determine the amount of risk exposure that will be assumed by the captive, which varies depending on the captive’s capitalization, line of business, amount retained by the Company and amount to be reinsured by excess reinsurers. The Company then issues an insurance policy and receives premium from the insured. Pursuant to the quota-share reinsurance agreement between the Company and the captive, the Company generally cedes (transfers) a portion of the retained risk to the captive and pays to the captive its share of the net premium (after deducting ceding commissions, policy issuance fees, the cost of excess reinsurance, taxes and other fees and expenses). The Company generally seeks to cede approximately 50% of its loss exposure, but in some cases cedes as little as 20% or as much as 80% of its loss exposure. The Company secures obligations due from captives through the use of funds withheld trusts or letters of credit. Through its reinsurance intermediary subsidiary and independent intermediaries, the Company obtains excess-of-loss reinsurance subject to agreed upon limits and retention levels. The Company generally administers all claims handling functions, and the captive provides funds to the Company for the payment of the captive’s proportionate share of paid claims and claims expenses. The captive realizes investment income from its capital, unearned premium and loss reserves. The captive also receives its proportionate share of the underwriting results.

      The Company also offers its clients rent-a-captive risk-sharing programs. These programs allow a client to retain a significant portion of its own loss exposure without the same level of administrative costs and capital commitment required to establish and operate its own captive.

      In another variation of client risk-sharing, the Company establishes retrospectively-rated programs for individual accounts. In this type of program, the Company works with the client to develop the appropriate self-insured retention and loss fund amount and then helps arrange for excess-of-loss reinsurance. The client reimburses the Company for all claim payments within the client’s retention. The Company generally earns a

6

Table of Contents

management fee (which includes claims and loss control fees). In most of these programs, the Company also participates in the operating results of the reinsurance coverage and earns a ceding commission.

      Agent Risk-Sharing. The Company also writes specialty risk insurance on a risk-sharing basis with agents or brokers. The Company believes agent risk-sharing has grown as a result of market volatility and lack of coverage availability in the traditional market. Risk-sharing is achieved either through an agent-owned captive, rent-a-captive or through a variable commission structure based upon the underwriting results.

      The agent may own a captive or purchase an interest in a rent-a-captive, which acts as a reinsurer on business produced. In some cases, the captive’s shareholders may include key producers, subproducers or insureds. In other circumstances, the agent accepts a lower up-front commission in exchange for a multi-year contingent commission based on operating results.

      Fully-Insured Programs: In fully-insured programs, the Company provides traditional insurance without a risk-sharing mechanism and derives revenue from net earned premiums and investment income. Fully-insured programs are developed in response to specific market opportunities and generally when the Company believes there is potential to evolve into a risk-sharing mechanism.

     Description of Major Specialty Risk Management Services

      Program and Product Design. Prior to implementing a new program, the Company generally reviews background data, including financial projections for the contemplated program; historical loss experience; actuarial studies of the underlying risks; the credit worthiness of the potential client; and the availability of reinsurance. A senior management team and associates representing each of the risk-management disciplines within the Company work together to design, market, and implement new programs. While the Company does not generate substantial fees for program design services, these services are an integral part of the Company’s program management services and due diligence process.

      Underwriting/ Risk Selection and Policy Issuance. The Company performs underwriting services for its clients, its clients’ captives and certain individual accounts. Compensation for underwriting services generally is included in the Company’s management fees. The Company’s underwriting personnel help develop the proper criteria for selecting risks, while actuarial and reinsurance personnel evaluate and recommend the appropriate levels of risk retention. The program is then tailored according to the requirements and qualifications of each client.

      Formation and Management of Risk-Bearing Entities. The Company generates fees by forming and managing risk-bearing entities for clients and agents. The Company currently manages over twenty captives and/or rent-a-captives and holds a minority interest in three of these captives. The Company also holds a minority interest in two former captives which are no longer managed by the Company and are currently in run-off, or have been commuted. The offshore captives are managed by one of the Company’s subsidiaries in Bermuda or Barbados.

      Claims Handling and Administration. The Company earns fees for handling and managing claims for workers’ compensation and most other casualty lines, such as property and general liability. It handles all claims functions for most of the programs managed by the Company. The Company’s involvement in claims handling and administration provides feedback to program managers in assessing the client’s risk environment and the overall structure of the program.

      Loss Prevention and Control. The Company earns fees for loss control services, which are designed to help clients prevent or limit certain loss events. Through an evaluation of the client’s workplace environment, the Company’s loss control specialists assist the client in planning and implementing a loss prevention program and, in certain cases, provide educational and training programs for the client.

      Reinsurance Brokerage. Through its reinsurance brokerage subsidiary, Meadowbrook Intermediaries, Inc., the Company earns commissions by placing excess-of-loss reinsurance and insurance coverage with high

7

Table of Contents

deductibles for insurance companies, captives and self-insured programs managed by the Company. Reinsurance is also placed for clients who do not have other business relationships with the Company.

      Sales, Marketing, and Public Relations. The Company markets its programs and services to associations, groups, local, regional and national insurance agents, and insurance consultants. Sales and marketing efforts include personal contact through independent agents, direct mail, telemarketing, advertising, internet-based marketing including affiliations with an insurance based web portal (captive.com) and the Company’s corporate website (www.meadowbrook.com), and attendance at seminars and trade and industry conventions.

      In June 2000, the Company launched its Advantage System (“Advantage”) and Agents Edge™. Advantage is an internet-based business processing system which reduces the Company’s internal administrative costs. In addition to administrative processing efficiencies, Advantage enhances underwriting practices, by automating risk selection criteria.

      Agents Edge™ is a specific application of Advantage utilizing an automated, predictable, profit-driven underwriting model to make workers’ compensation products available to select agencies through its regional branch offices. The Company is currently writing Agents Edge™ in fourteen states for its workers’ compensation programs and has plans to expand into other states in the future.

Insurance Operations

      The Company’s four wholly-owned domestic insurance company subsidiaries, Star, Savers, Ameritrust, and Williamsburg (collectively referred to as the “Insurance Company Subsidiaries”) issue insurance policies. Through the Insurance Company Subsidiaries, the Company engages in specialty risk management programs where the Company takes underwriting risks in exchange for premiums. The Insurance Company Subsidiaries primarily focus on specialty programs designed specifically for trade groups and associations, whose members are homogeneous in nature. Member insureds are typically small-to-medium sized businesses. The Company’s programs focus on select classes of property/casualty business which, through its due diligence process, the Company believes demonstrate a fundamentally sound prospect for generating underwriting profits. The Company does not generally offer its programs on a nationwide basis; rather, the programs operate on a regional or state-specific basis. The Company avoids geographic concentration of risks that might lead to natural or intentionally caused catastrophic events. The Company’s offshore captives, American Indemnity and PICL, which offer clients captive or rent-a-captive options, complement the Insurance Company Subsidiaries.

      Star, Savers, Williamsburg and Ameritrust are domiciled in Michigan, Missouri, California and Florida, respectively. American Indemnity and PICL are Bermuda-based insurance companies.

      The Company may at times place risks directly with third-party insurance carriers and participate in the risk as a reinsurance partner. Such arrangements typically generate management fee income and provide a means to manage premium leverage ratios.

      The Insurance Company Subsidiaries are authorized to write business, on either an admitted or surplus lines basis, in all fifty states. The Insurance Company Subsidiaries primarily offer workers’ compensation, commercial multiple peril, general liability, inland marine, and other liability coverages. For the year ended December 31, 2003, the workers’ compensation line of business accounted for 55.9% and 61.7% of gross written premiums and net earned premiums, respectively.

      Despite the losses reported from 1999 to 2001, the Company is dedicated to achieving consistent operating profitability. The Company’s strategy has been one of highly disciplined niche underwriting and historically this focus has produced profitable underwriting results.

      The Company became a public company in 1995, raising approximately $44.0 million in capital, which enabled the Company to take advantage of new growth opportunities. In deploying the capital raised, the Company experienced growth by writing new insurance programs and making several strategic acquisitions.

8

Table of Contents

      Beginning in late 1998, the Company’s underwriting results were impacted by adverse development on a limited group of insurance programs that were started during this period. Underwriting losses in those programs continued to grow, resulting in a significant reduction in statutory surplus within the Insurance Company Subsidiaries during 1999, 2000, and through the second quarter of 2001. The resulting impact on the Company’s financial position eventually caused the Insurance Company Subsidiaries to be downgraded from “A-” (Excellent) to stable “B” (Fair) by the leading insurance rating agency, A.M. Best Company (“A.M. Best”).

      During the three years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, the Company took actions to eliminate a limited group of unprofitable programs that were not aligned with its historic and present alternative risk management strategy. The Company also established strict corporate program guidelines that identify the following program types as unacceptable:

	•	Risk-taking in the surety line of business;
	•	Programs with aggregate stop loss provisions, where the client’s risk-sharing is capped at a specified loss ratio; and
	•	Programs which lack adequate capital contributed by the risk-sharing partner or proven profitable experience.

      The underwriting losses associated with these discontinued programs were $12.8 million, $29.0 million, and $12.0 million, for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively. As a result of the concerted run-off strategy, all premiums related to these programs were fully earned during the first half of 2002. In addition, at December 31, 2003, the uncertainty of future reserve development on these discontinued programs appears to have been reduced as a result of aggressive claims handling and reserve strengthening. While the Company believes it has adequate reserves, there can be no assurances that there will not be additional losses in the future relating to these programs.

      In addition to these discontinued programs, starting in late 2000 and in 2001, the Company terminated a number of programs to reduce gross and net premium leverage ratios. While these programs were within the Company’s underwriting guidelines, their performance was less profitable than the Company’s targeted return on equity goals. The remaining programs of the Company, which are considered to be its continuing/core programs, have historically met the underwriting profitability goals.

      In June 2002, the Company successfully completed an offering of 21,275,000 shares of newly issued common stock at $3.10 per share. The Company received $60.5 million in total net proceeds from the offering, of which $37.5 million was contributed to the surplus of Star as of June 30, 2002 and $20.0 million was used to pay down its line of credit. As a result of the capital contribution to Star, on June 26, 2002, A.M. Best upgraded the Insurance Company Subsidiaries financial strength rating to “B+” (Very Good) with a positive outlook. A positive outlook is placed on a company’s rating if its financial and market trends are favorable, relative to its current rating level. The upgrade reflects A.M. Best’s positive assessment of the Company’s improved financial condition as a result of the issuance of new common shares and its debt reduction and indicates the potential for a near term upgrade. The Company believes that as a result of its improved balance sheet and operating performance its rating will remain at least at its current level, if not at an upgraded level. However, there can be no assurance that A.M. Best will not change its rating of the Insurance Company Subsidiaries in the future.

      On September 30, 2003, the Company issued $10.3 million of junior subordinated debentures (“Debentures”) to an unconsolidated subsidiary trust of the Company. The Company received a total of $9.7 million in net proceeds from the issuance of the Debentures. The Company contributed $6.3 million of the proceeds to the surplus of Star.

9

Table of Contents

      The following table summarizes the gross written premium and net earned premium for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000, and 1999.

Reserves

      The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to pages 54 and 61-62 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, and pages 21-22 and 29-32 of Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

10

Table of Contents

      The following table shows the development of reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses (“LAE”) from 1994 through 2003 for the Company’s current Insurance Company Subsidiaries including American Indemnity and PICL.

      Due to the Company’s adoption of SFAS 113, the bottom portion of the table shows the impact of reinsurance for the years 1994 through 2003, reconciling the net reserves shown in the upper portion of the table to gross reserves.

Analysis of Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Development

11

Table of Contents

      The following table sets forth the difference between GAAP reserves for loss and loss adjustment expenses and statutory reserves for loss and loss adjustment expenses at December 31, (in thousands):

*

For the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company reported an increase of $20.8 million in gross ultimate loss estimates for accident years 2002 and prior, or 5.5% of $374.9 million of gross loss and LAE reserves at December 31, 2002. The Company reported a $2.9 million increase in net ultimate loss and LAE estimates for accident years 2002 and prior, or 1.5% of $193.1 million. The change in gross ultimate loss estimates for accident years 2002 and prior is greater than the change in net ultimate loss estimates as a result of gross development on three programs in which the Company retained less than 2.5% of the risk, also known as fronted business.

**	The GAAP allowance for reinsurance recoverables is reported as a Schedule F penalty or a non-admitted asset for statutory accounting.

***	American Indemnity and PICL are offshore captives, which offer clients captive or rent-a-captive options. They are not domestic insurance companies and, therefore, are not included in the combined statutory financial statements filed with the National Association of Insurance Commissioners and state regulators.

      As a result of adverse development on prior accident years’ reserves, the provision for losses and loss adjustment expenses increased by $2.9 million, $6.1 million, and $14.4 million in calendar years 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively.

Investments

      Certain information required by this item is incorporated by reference to pages 53 and 58-60 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, and pages 24-25 of Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

Competition and Pricing

      The Company competes with other providers of alternative risk management programs and services and with traditional providers of commercial insurance coverages. Both the alternative risk management and the traditional property and casualty insurance markets are highly competitive. The Company’s alternative risk management programs and services compete with products and services offered by insurance companies, other providers of alternative risk management services (including domestic and foreign insurers and reinsurers and insurance brokers), as well as with self-insurance plans, captives managed by others, and a variety of other risk-financing vehicles and mechanisms. These competitive products are offered by other companies that may have greater financial resources than the Company. The Company’s agency operations compete with other local, regional, and national insurance agencies for individual client insurance needs.

      The market for alternative risk management products and services is significantly influenced by market conditions affecting the traditional property and casualty insurance industry. Insurance market conditions historically have been subject to significant variability due to premium rate competition, natural disasters and other catastrophic events, judicial trends, changes in the investment and interest rate environment, regulation

12

Table of Contents

and general economic conditions. Pricing is a primary means of competition in the commercial insurance market. Competition is also based on the availability and quality of products, quality and speed of service (including claims service), financial strength, ratings, distribution systems and technical expertise. The primary basis for competition among alternative risk management providers varies with the financial and insurance needs and resources of each potential insured. Principle factors that are considered by insureds include an analysis of the net present-value (after tax) of the cost of financing the insured’s expected level of losses; the amount of excess coverage provided in the event losses exceed expected levels; cash flow and tax planning considerations; and the expected quality and consistency of the services to be provided. The Company believes that it is able to compete based on its experience, the quality of its products and services, and its program-oriented approach. However, its ability to successfully compete is dependent upon a number of factors, including market and competitive conditions, many of which are outside of its control.

Regulation

Regulation in General

      The Insurance Company Subsidiaries are subject to regulation by government agencies in the states in which they do business. The nature and extent of such regulation varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction but typically involves prior approval of the acquisition of control of an insurance company or of any company controlling an insurance company; regulation of certain transactions entered into by an insurance company with any of its affiliates; approval of premium rates, forms and policies used for many lines of insurance; standards of solvency and minimum amounts of capital and surplus which must be maintained; establishment of reserves required to be maintained for unearned premium, loss and loss expense, or for other purposes; limitations on types and amounts of investments; restrictions on the size of risks that may be insured by a single company; licensing of insurers and agents; deposits of securities for the benefit of policyholders; and the filing of periodic reports with respect to financial condition and other matters. In addition, state regulatory examiners perform periodic examinations of insurance companies. Such regulation is generally intended for the protection of policyholders rather than security holders.

      In addition to the regulatory oversight of the Insurance Company Subsidiaries, the Company is subject to regulation under the Michigan, Missouri, California and Florida Insurance Holding Company System Regulatory Acts (the “Holding Company Acts”). The Holding Company Acts contain certain reporting requirements including those requiring the Company, as the ultimate parent company, to file information relating to its capital structure, ownership, and financial condition and general business operations of its Insurance Company Subsidiaries. The Holding Company Acts contain special reporting and prior approval requirements with respect to transactions among affiliates.

      Insurance companies are also affected by a variety of state and federal legislative and regulatory measures and judicial decisions that define and extend the risks and benefits for which insurance is sought and provided. These include redefinition of risk exposure in areas such as product liability, environmental damage, and workers’ compensation. In addition, individual state insurance departments may prevent premium rates for some classes of insureds from reflecting the level of risk assumed by the insurer for those classes. Such developments may adversely affect the profitability of various lines of insurance. In some cases, these adverse effects on profitability can be minimized through repricing, if permitted by applicable regulations, of coverages or limitations or cessation of the affected business.

      The Company’s reinsurance intermediary is also subject to regulation. Under applicable regulations, the intermediary is responsible as a fiduciary for funds received on account of the parties to the reinsurance transaction and is required to hold such funds in appropriate bank accounts subject to restrictions on withdrawals and prohibitions on commingling.

13

Table of Contents

Insurance Regulation Concerning Change or Acquisition of Control

      Star, Savers, Williamsburg and Ameritrust are domestic property and casualty insurance companies organized, respectively, under the insurance laws (the “Insurance Codes”) of Michigan, Missouri, California, and Florida. The Insurance Codes provide that acquisition or change of “control” of a domestic insurer or of any person that controls a domestic insurer cannot be consummated without the prior approval of the relevant insurance regulatory authority. A person seeking to acquire control, directly or indirectly, of a domestic insurance company or of any person controlling a domestic insurance company must generally file with the relevant insurance regulatory authority an application for change of control (commonly known as a “Form A”) containing information required by statute and published regulations and provide a copy of such Form A to the domestic insurer. In Michigan, Missouri, California, and Florida, control is generally presumed to exist if any person, directly or indirectly, owns, controls, holds with the power to vote or holds proxies representing 10% or more of the voting securities of the company.

      In addition, many state insurance regulatory laws contain provisions that require pre-notification to state agencies of a change in control of a non-domestic admitted insurance company in that state. While such pre-notification statutes do not authorize the state agency to disapprove the change of control, such statutes do authorize issuance of a cease and desist order with respect to the non-domestic admitted insurer if certain conditions exist, such as undue market concentration.

      Any future transactions that would constitute a change in control of the Company would also generally require prior approval by the Insurance Departments of Michigan, Missouri, California, and Florida and would require pre-acquisition notification in those states that have adopted pre-acquisition notification provisions and in which the insurers are admitted. Such requirements may deter, delay or prevent certain transactions that could be advantageous to the shareholders of the Company.

Membership in Insolvency Funds and Associations and Mandatory Pools

      Most states require admitted property and casualty insurers to become members of insolvency funds or associations, which generally protect policyholders against the insolvency of such insurers. Members of the fund or association must contribute to the payment of certain claims made against insolvent insurers. Maximum contributions required by law in any one year vary between 1% and 2% of annual premium written by a member in that state. Assessments from insolvency funds were $783,000, $1,614,000, and $991,000, respectively, for 2003, 2002, and 2001. Most of these payments are recoverable through future policy surcharges and premium tax reductions.

      The Insurance Company Subsidiaries are also required to participate in various mandatory insurance facilities or in funding mandatory pools, which are generally designed to provide insurance coverage for consumers who are unable to obtain insurance in the voluntary insurance market. Among the pools participated in are those established in certain states to provide windstorm and other similar types of property coverage. These pools typically require all companies writing applicable lines of insurance in the state for which the pool has been established to fund deficiencies experienced by the pool based upon each company’s relative premium writings in that state, with any excess funding typically distributed to the participating companies on the same basis. To the extent that these assessments are not covered by reinsurance treaties, they may have an adverse effect on the Company. Total assessments paid to all such facilities were $2,379,000, $2,800,000, and $1,918,000, respectively, during 2003, 2002, and 2001.

Restrictions on Dividends and Risk-Based Capital

      The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to pages 68-69 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, and pages 36-38 of Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

14

Table of Contents

Effect of Federal Legislation

      The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (“TRIA”) was signed into law on November 26, 2002, and provides government support for businesses that suffer damages as a result of acts of foreign based terrorism. TRIA serves as an additional high layer of reinsurance against losses that may arise from a domestic incident by foreign groups. The impact to the Company resulting from TRIA is minimal as the Company does not underwrite risks that are considered targets for terrorism; avoids concentrations of exposures in both property and workers’ compensation; and has terrorism coverage included in its reinsurance treaties to cover the most likely exposure.

NAIC-IRIS Ratios

      The National Association of Insurance Commissioners’ (“NAIC”) Insurance Regulatory Information System (“IRIS”) was developed by a committee of state insurance regulators and is primarily intended to assist state insurance departments in executing their statutory mandates to oversee the financial condition of insurance companies operating in their respective states. IRIS identifies twelve industry ratios and specifies “usual values” for each ratio. Departure from the usual values on four or more ratios generally leads to inquiries or possible further review from individual state insurance commissioners. Refer to pages 37-38 of Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

Available Information

      The Company’s internet address is www.meadowbrook.com. There the Company makes available, free of charge, the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonable practicable after the Company electronically files such material with, or furnishes it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The Company’s SEC reports can be accessed through the investor relations section of the Company’s website. The information found on the Company’s website is not part of this or any other report the Company files with, or furnishes to the SEC.

Item 2.     Properties

      The Company currently leases its corporate offices in Southfield, Michigan from an unaffiliated third party. In 2003, the Company paid rent for its corporate offices in the amount of approximately $1.3 million. The term of the lease for the offices in Southfield expires on September 30, 2004. The Company, through its subsidiaries, is also a party to various leases for locations in which such subsidiaries have offices. The Company does not consider any of these leases to be material.

      In 1998, Star purchased land in close proximity to its existing offices. The cost of the land was $3.2 million. On September 30, 2003, the Company purchased the land from Star at fair market value.

      On December 3, 2003, the Company entered into a Development Agreement with an unaffiliated third party for the construction of an office building on the above mentioned land for a contract price of $11.0 million. The office building will serve as the new location for the Company’s corporate offices. The office building will consist of approximately 72,000 gross square feet.

      In 2000, Savers purchased the building in Cerritos, California for $2.0 million, in which one of the Company’s subsidiaries has its operations.

Item 3.     Legal Proceedings

      On June 26, 1995, two shareholders and an officer of a former agent (the “Primary Plaintiffs”) of Star, and a former spouse of one shareholder and an employee of the former agent (the “Individual Plaintiffs”) initiated legal proceedings against, among others, Star and Meadowbrook in the District Court for Washoe County, Reno, Nevada. All of the plaintiffs requested injunctive relief, compensatory damages, punitive and

15

Table of Contents

exemplary damages, and attorney’s fees in an unspecified amount. The Nevada Insurance Department revoked the license of one of the Primary Plaintiffs and one of the Individual Plaintiffs and denied further licensing of the other Primary Plaintiffs.

      Meadowbrook and Star vigorously defended themselves and filed counterclaims against the Primary and Individual Plaintiffs. On April 1, 1998, the Court issued an Order dismissing all claims of the Primary Plaintiffs with prejudice.

      On January 12, 1999, the remaining claims of the Individual Plaintiffs and the counterclaims of Meadowbrook and Star against the Primary Plaintiffs were tried. On February 3, 1999, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Meadowbrook and Star against the Primary and Individual Plaintiffs. In addition, the jury found against the Individual Plaintiffs and in favor of Meadowbrook and Star on their remaining claims. On April 21, 1999, the Court found in favor of Meadowbrook and Star and against the Primary and Individual Plaintiffs on all outstanding claims for equitable relief.

      A Final Judgment has been entered into with the Court. All plaintiffs have filed an appeal with the Nevada Supreme Court. One of the plaintiff’s has been discharged from bankruptcy and another has had a Receiver appointed for him. The case remains stayed before the Nevada Supreme Court. It is not expected that the outcome of this litigation will have a material impact on the financial statements of the Company.

      The Company is involved in other litigation arising in the ordinary course of operations. The Company has vigorously defended such litigation. While the results of litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, management is of the opinion, after reviewing these matters with legal counsel, that the final outcome of such litigation will not have a material effect upon the Company’s financial statements.

Item 4.     Submission of Matters To A Vote of Security Holders

      None.

PART II

Item 5.     Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

16

Table of Contents

Shareholder Relations and Form 10-K

      A copy of Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc.’s 2003 Annual Report and Form 10-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, may be obtained upon written request to the Investor Relations Department at the Company’s Corporate Offices, or contact:

	Karen M. Spaun, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (248) 204-8178     karen.spaun@meadowbrook.com
	Jennifer La, Director of Financial Analysis (248) 204-8159     jennifer.la@meadowbrook.com

Direct Investment Plan

      Meadowbrook’s Shareholder Investment Plan (“Plan”) offers a simple and systematic way to purchase Meadowbrook Common Stock without paying brokerage fees or commissions. With the Plan’s many flexible features, an account may be customized to reflect individual financial and investment objectives.

      If you would like additional information including a prospectus and an application, please contact: LaSalle Bank National Association (800) 246-5761, option 2.

Share Price and Dividend Information

      The following table sets forth for the periods indicated, the high and low closing sale prices of the Company’s Common Shares as reported on the NYSE Composite Tape, and quarterly dividends paid for the years ended December 31:

      For additional information regarding dividend restrictions, refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis — Liquidity and Capital Resources”.

      As of March 1, 2004 there were approximately 271 holders of record of the Company’s common stock. For purposes of this determination, Cede & Co., the nominee for the Depositary Trust Company is treated as one holder.

17

Table of Contents

Item 6.     Selected Financial Data

Selected Consolidated Financial Data

18

Table of Contents

(1)

Both the loss and loss adjustment expense ratios are calculated based upon unconsolidated insurance company operations. Certain intercompany costs directly related to policy acquisition and other underwriting expenses are classified as salary and employee benefit expenses in the consolidated financial statements. The following table sets forth the intercompany fees, which are eliminated in consolidation.

Unconsolidated GAAP data — Ratio Calculation Table: