UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FORM 10-K
[X] | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
[ ] | TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number: 0-27938
COLUMBIA BANCORP
93-1193156 | ||
Oregon | (I.R.S. Employer | |
(State of incorporation) | Identification No.) |
401 East Third Street, Suite 200
The Dalles, Oregon 97058
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrants telephone number: (541) 298-6649
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: Common stock, no par value
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [X] No [ ]
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the stock was sold, or the average bid and asked prices of such stock, as of June 30, 2003, which is the last business day of the registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $116,304,117.
The number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common equity as of the latest practicable date: 8,780,109 shares of no par value common stock on February 17, 2004.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrants proxy statement dated March 1, 2004 for the 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (Proxy Statement) are incorporated by reference in Part III hereof.
COLUMBIA BANCORP
FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE | ||||||||||
Disclosure Regarding Forward Looking Statements | 3 | |||||||||
PART I | ||||||||||
Item 1. | Description of Business | 4-12 | ||||||||
Item 2. | Properties | 13-14 | ||||||||
Item 3. | Legal Proceedings | 14 | ||||||||
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | 14 | ||||||||
PART II | ||||||||||
Item 5. | Market for Registrants Common Equity and Related Shareholder Matters | 14-15 | ||||||||
Item 6. | Selected Financial Data | 15 | ||||||||
Item 7. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 16-36 | ||||||||
Item 7A | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk | 37-38 | ||||||||
Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data | 39-82 | ||||||||
Item 9. | Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure | 83 | ||||||||
Item 9A | Controls and Procedures | 83 | ||||||||
PART III | ||||||||||
(Items 11 through 14 are incorporated by reference from Columbia Bancorps definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 22, 2004) | ||||||||||
Item 10. | Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant | 83-84 | ||||||||
Item 11 | Executive Compensation and Report of Compensation Committee | 84 | ||||||||
Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management | 84 | ||||||||
Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions | 84 | ||||||||
Item 14. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services | 84 | ||||||||
PART IV | ||||||||||
Item 15. | Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K | 84-87 | ||||||||
SIGNATURES | 88 |
2
DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report, particularly including but not limited to the section entitled Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains a number of forward-looking statements about our anticipated business, operations, financial performance and cash flows. Statements in this report that relate to future plans, events and circumstances are provided to describe managements intentions and expectations based on currently available information, and readers should not construe these statements as assurances or guarantees. As with any predictions, these statements are inherently difficult to make with any degree of assurance, and actual results may differ materially and adversely from managements expectations described herein. Likewise, managements plans described in this report may not come to pass because unforeseen events may force management to deviate from its expressed intentions. Forward-looking statements often can be identified by the use of predictive or prospective terms such as expect, anticipate, believe, plan, intend, and words of similar construction or meaning. Some of the events or circumstances that may cause our actual results to deviate from managements expectations include the impact of competition and local and regional economic factors upon our customer base, our deposits and our loan portfolio; economic and regulatory limits on our ability to grow our assets and manage our business; customer acceptance of our products and services; interest rate fluctuations that may adversely impact our revenues and expenses; and, the impact of impairment charges upon our intangible and other assets. We also face risks associated with the geographic concentration of our customers, our ability to maintain or expand our market share or net interest margins, and competitive and economic issues that impact our ability to implement our marketing and growth strategies. Other factors that may adversely impact our performance are discussed in the section entitled Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Factors that May Affect Future Results of Operations, as well as other disclosures we make from time to time in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Readers should be aware that these factors are not an exhaustive list, and should not assume that these are the only factors that may cause our actual results to differ from our expectations. Readers also should note that forward-looking statements expressed in this report are made as of the date this report is filed and management cannot undertake to update those statements to reflect future events or circumstances.
3
Part I
ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
General
Columbia Bancorp (Columbia) is a financial holding company organized in 1996 under Oregon Law. Columbia is headquartered in The Dalles, Oregon, with two wholly owned subsidiaries, Columbia River Bank (CRB) and Columbia Bancorp Trust I. CRB is an 18 branch, state-chartered institution authorized to provide banking services in Oregon and Washington. Columbia offers a broad range of financial services to its customers, primarily small and medium sized businesses, farmers, and individuals. Columbias 12 full-service branch facilities and three limited-service branch facilities in Oregon serve the northern and eastern Oregon communities of The Dalles (2), Hood River, Pendleton and Hermiston, the central Oregon communities of Madras, Redmond, and Bend (3), and the communities of McMinnville (3), Canby and Newberg in the Willamette Valley. Columbias three south central Washington full-service branches serve the communities of Goldendale, White Salmon and Kennewick.
As of December 31, 2003, Columbia had total assets of $584.14 million, total deposits of $496.36 million, and shareholders equity of $57.80 million. Columbias net income for the year ended December 31, 2003, was $9.83 million, which was Columbias 17th consecutive year of increasingly higher net income.
From CRBs establishment in 1977 as a one-branch bank in The Dalles, Oregon, Columbia has grown as a result of merger and acquisition activity, new branch openings, the introduction of new business lines and the expansion and cross-marketing of its existing products and community-bank lending expertise. Collectively, these growth activities have enabled Columbia to diversify its loan portfolio and operating risks over several market areas and local economies, which can be defined geographically as central Oregon, Willamette Valley Oregon, Mid-Columbia Oregon and south central Washington. This market diversity in which Columbia operates poses both opportunities and challenges to a community bank operating in varied local economies. Columbias approach to meeting the challenge is to staff its branches and business groups with managers who are established in their communities and have developed a loyal customer following. Columbias senior management, in conjunction with branch managers, review the operations of each branch to determine which products and services are best suited to that geographic region. Management believes that geographic diversity across a broad portion of the Pacific Northwest will limit Columbias exposure to adverse market conditions in any one geographical region or economic sector.
Columbia provides high quality financial products and services to consumers and businesses. Our offerings include a broad range of deposit and loan products and services including retail banking, mortgage loans, broker dealer and commercial, agricultural and real estate lending.
In 2003, Columbia focused on strengthening market share by opening a new branch in Kennewick, Washington and announcing two new branch locations in Bend and Redmond, Oregon planned for 2004. The mortgage lending office in Newport, Oregon has been closed due to insufficient loan volume necessary to meet strategic financial goals. Columbia also initiated changes to the mortgage and financial services divisions. The name Columbia River Bank Mortgage Group was changed to Columbia River Bank Mortgage Team (Mortgage Team); CRB Financial Services has become CRB Financial Services Team (Financial Services Team). These changes create a shift in customer perception and provide value by identifying employees as part of a team. The Mortgage Team has discontinued the practice of growing the mortgage servicing asset by capitalizing the service retained premiums. In addition, interest rate risk normally associated with the mortgage lending pipeline has been reduced by locking mortgage rates directly with potential investors, sometimes known as best efforts. Best efforts involves the sale of mortgage loans to third party investors at a committed loan rate and loan amount within a predetermined time period without risk of a penalty for failure to deliver the locked mortgage loans.
Columbia has two reportable operating business segments, Community Banking and Mortgage Banking. A summary of Columbias net revenue, earnings from operations and assets for business segments is found in Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, which is incorporated herein by reference. A discussion of various factors potentially affecting our operations is set forth in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Factors That
4
May Affect Future Results of Operations, in Item 7, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Business Strategy
Columbias strategy is to remain a high performing financial institution, which is defined as achieving performance levels in the top quartile of all bank holding companies with assets between $500 million to $1 billion. Performance statistics are presented quarterly in the Bank Holding Company Performance Report as prepared by the Federal Reserve Bank. Columbia will continue building on its position as a leading community-based provider of financial services in Oregon and Washington while maintaining an close balance of its goals and priorities with benefits to shareholders, customers and employees. The components of Columbias business strategy are outlined below.
Successfully operate in small to medium sized communities. Columbia believes the key to profitability is to maintain and open branches in small to medium sized communities, which are defined by population levels between 20,000 to 150,000 in size. This strategy encompasses the following: (i) provide a high level of service to the customer; (ii) staff branches with employees who have established ties to the community; (iii) attract and retain a highly skilled management team; and, (iv) allow branch personnel the flexibility to emphasize products and services which best fit their local economy. In addition, by decentralizing a portion of the management function to the branch level, Columbia believes it can make business decisions regarding customers more quickly and with added value than its major banking competitors. Columbia believes it is able to profitably attract and retain customers by providing and delivering products and services tailored to their individual needs, and by delivering them with a high degree of personal attention. Management and the Board of Directors will carefully review any exception to this strategy to ensure it is complimentary to Columbias current and future strategic initiatives.
Maintain high asset quality. Columbia seeks to maintain high asset quality through a program that includes prompt and strict adherence to established credit policies combined with training and supervision of lending officers. Additionally, Columbia uses incentives to maintain high asset quality, including tying a portion of its loan officers compensation to the quality of the loans they originate. Columbia also believes that its commitment to hire branch managers with long-term ties to their communities is of significant assistance in determining the quality of loan transactions it receives. The variety of economies in which Columbias branches are located increases the diversification and, in Columbias opinion, the strength of the overall loan portfolio.
Products and Services
Consumer Distribution Channels
Columbia offers a broad range of deposit and loan products and services tailored to meet the banking requirements of consumers in Columbias market areas. These include:
Retail Bank Products and Services. Columbias consumer deposit products include numerous noninterest-bearing and interest-bearing demand accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts, and certificates of deposit. Management generally prices interest-bearing accounts based on competitive market factors, a desire to manage certain types or maturities of deposit liabilities and liquidity requirements. Columbia strives to establish customer relations to attract core deposits in noninterest-bearing transactional accounts, which reduces its cost of funds. Columbia provides loans to individual borrowers for a variety of purposes, including secured and unsecured personal loans, home equity, personal lines of credit and motor vehicle loans.
CRB Mortgage Team Products and Services. Columbia offers a complete range of mortgage banking services including loans for single-family owner occupied homes, construction to permanent financing packages and mortgages for vacation and rental homes. Customers can choose between fixed, variable and balloon rate options. Construction loans are available through the conventional two-step process or through a construction to permanent basis. Junior lien financing is also offered as a single product or in combination with a first mortgage. An added benefit offered through the Mortgage Team is the ability for customers to access alternative secondary market outlets not normally available from other financial institutions.
CRB Financial Services Team Products and Services. Through arrangements with Primevest Financial Services, Inc., (Primevest) a registered securities broker-dealer, Financial Services Team
5
offers a wide range of non-Federal Deposit Insurance Company (FDIC) insured financial products and services to consumers. These include stocks, mutual funds, traditional and Roth IRAs, SEPs, tax-sheltered annuities, life insurance, and other financial products. Representatives also offer retirement planning services. Columbia receives a portion of the commissions generated from financial product sales.
Technology-Based Products and Services. Columbia uses both traditional and new technology to support its focus on personal service. These include a VISA credit and check card (debit card) program; ATMs at each of Columbias full-service branches, including 15 on-site ATMs and five off-site ATMs; and, a telephone banking service that allows customers to speak directly with a customer service representative during normal banking hours or with 24-hour telephone access to their accounts. In addition, Columbia, through its web site, offers BankNet, an Internet banking service, which allows access to account information as well as the ability to view checks and use other services in an on-line environment.
Commercial Distribution Channels
Columbia has an experienced lending staff, who have special expertise in small business, agricultural and real estate lending. Columbias loan officers emphasize continuing contact with business customers after loans are made. Columbia believes that its business customers appreciate the ongoing relationship they develop with their local lending officer. Such relationship-based banking is an important aspect of Columbias continuous effort to maintain high asset quality.
Commercial Loans. Columbia offers customized loans including equipment and inventory financing, operational lines of credit, SBA loans for qualified businesses, and accounts receivable financing. A significant portion of Columbias loan portfolio consists of commercial loans. For regulatory reporting purposes, a portion of Columbias commercial loans are designated as real estate loans because they are secured by real property, although these loans may finance accounts receivable, equipment and inventory purchases, or other commercial activities. Lending decisions are based on careful evaluation of the financial strength, management, credit history of the borrower and the quality and marketability of the collateral securing the loan. Commercial loans secured by real property are generally limited to 75% of the value of the collateral. Columbia often requires personal guarantees and relies on the identification of secondary sources of repayment.
Agricultural Loans. Columbia provides loans including production lines of credit, equipment financing, and term loans for capital improvements and other business purposes to agricultural businesses. Agricultural loans are generally secured by crops, equipment, and inventory, as well as real estate. Agricultural lending can require significant follow-up time, as farmers request budgeting assistance and other financial advice. Columbia employs two agricultural loan consultants with decades of farm lending experience, to assist its loan officers in loan processing and administration. Columbias loan officers, many of whom are graduates of the Western Agricultural Banking School in Pullman, Washington, make frequent visits to farming operation sites, regularly attend agricultural lending programs and seminars, and actively participate in growers associations and other agricultural-based organizations.
Real Estate Loans. Real estate loans are available for the construction, purchase, or refinance of commercial and rental properties. Columbia also provides financing to high quality land developers, and speculative and pre-sold financing to contractors. Borrowers can choose from a variety of fixed and adjustable rate options and terms.
Columbias real estate loans are in large part loans to commercial customers, farmers and ranchers and are secured by the properties used in their businesses. The majority of these loans have a variable rate feature with adjustment periods varying from one to five years. Insofar as payments on real estate loans depend on the successful operation and management of the businesses and properties securing the loans, repayment can be affected by local real estate market and economic conditions. Fluctuating land values and local economic conditions can make loans secured by real property difficult to evaluate and monitor.
Government-Assisted Loan Programs. Columbias loan officers make loans to small businesses and to farmers that are supported by guarantees issued by various state and federal government agencies. Columbia is active in the SBA 7-A and 504 programs, and in similar programs offered by the Farm Services Agency (formerly the Farmers Home Administration) and by Oregon Economic and
6
Community Development Department. The government guarantees a portion of these loans, which reduces risk in Columbias loan portfolio.
Services to Non-Profits and Public Entities. Columbia offers a general array of loan products to borrowers in the non-profit and public entity sector, including city and county governments, together with special programs, such as jumbo CDs and low-cost loan programs. Columbia also offers consumer services to nonprofit and public sector employees, such as Columbia VISA card enrollment and direct deposit services.
For all of its loans, Columbia at all times seeks to maintain sound loan underwriting standards with written loan policies, appropriate individual and branch limits, and loan administration committee reviews. In the case of particularly large loan commitments or loan participations, loans are reviewed by a loan committee of CRBs Board of Directors. Underwriting standards are designed to achieve a high-quality loan portfolio, compliance with lending regulations and the desired mix of loan maturities and industry concentrations. Management seeks to minimize credit losses by closely monitoring the financial condition of its borrowers and the value of collateral.
Cash Management Services. Columbia also offers to business customers an opportunity to meet additional banking needs online through its Internet Business Solutions product. This online product gives business customers the ability to process payroll, collections, wire transfers, and Electronic Funds Transfer tax payments.
Deposit and Related Products. Columbias business deposit products include basic, regular, and interest-bearing demand accounts, business money market accounts and sweep accounts. Columbia also offers check verification services to merchants allowing them the ability to determine, on a 24-hour basis, whether a check drawn on an account has sufficient funds to cover the amount drawn. In addition, Columbia offers a VISA merchant program for business customers.
Investment Products. Columbias affiliation with Primevest allows it to offer non-FDIC insured financial products and services to Columbias business customers as well as to consumers through Financial Services Team. These include insurance and annuity products, and employee retirement plan products such as SEPs, IRAs and 401(k) plans.
Principal Markets of Operation
Columbia accepts deposits at its branches in Wasco, Hood River, Jefferson, Deschutes, Clackamas, Yamhill and Umatilla Counties in Oregon and Klickitat and Benton Counties in Washington. Columbia makes loans in all of these counties and in adjacent counties including Sherman, Gilliam, and Crook counties in Oregon and Skamania County in Washington. Many of its products and services, including investment products through Financial Services Team and mortgages through the Mortgage Team, are offered and sold throughout Oregon and south central Washington. Columbias ability to increase its market share in the communities it serves is driven by a marketing plan consisting of several key components. A principal objective is to create and foster a sales culture in each branch and department. Employees are trained to cross-sell, offering appropriate products and services to existing customers and expanding business relationships. Columbia regularly examines the desirability and profitability of adding new products and services to those currently offered. Columbia also promotes specific products through media advertising, but relies primarily on referrals and direct contacts for new business. Columbia recognizes the importance of community service and supports employee involvement in community activities. This participation allows Columbia to make a contribution to the communities it serves, which management believes increases Columbias visibility in its markets and thereby increases business opportunities.
Columbia does business in many different small to medium sized communities. Management believes the diverse assortment of customers, communities, and economic sectors that Columbia serves are a source of strength. In addition, as a community banking organization Columbia has certain competitive advantages because of its local focus. However, Columbia is also more reliant on the local economies in its market areas than are super-regional and national banks.
7
We include as an asset on our balance sheet a mortgage servicing asset (MSA), which represents the estimated present value of our future income relating to service retained premiums from mortgage loans sold. The MSA has been steadily declining in value during the last three years as depressed mortgage interest rates have encouraged borrowers to pay off or refinance mortgages at a higherthan-expected rate, as shown below.
MORTGAGE SERVICING ASSET RECONCILIATION | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||
Mortgage servicing asset (MSA), beginning |
$ | 4,614,391 | $ | 6,196,801 | $ | 2,759,687 | ||||||
Add servicing retained premiums |
1,935,108 | 2,227,511 | 4,750,197 | |||||||||
Deduct MSA amortization |
2,000,050 | ) | (1,028,810 | ) | (395,354 | ) | ||||||
Deduct MSA valuation adjustments |
(858,000 | ) | (2,781,111 | ) | (917,729 | ) | ||||||
Mortgage servicing asset, ending |
$ | 3,691,449 | $ | 4,614,391 | 6,196,801 | |||||||
Competition
Columbias competitors for deposits are banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, money market funds, issuers of corporate and government securities, insurance companies, brokerage firms, mutual funds, and other financial intermediaries. Columbias business model is to compete on the basis of customer service and not solely on price. Columbia competes for deposits by offering a variety of deposit accounts at rates generally competitive with financial institutions in the area.
Columbias competition for loans comes principally from banks, savings and loan associations, mortgage companies, finance companies, insurance companies, credit unions, and other institutional lenders. A primary competitor for agricultural loans is Farm Credit Services. Columbia competes for loan originations through the level of interest rates and loan fees charged, its array of commercial and mortgage loan products, and the efficiency and quality of services provided to borrowers. Lending activity can also be affected by the availability of lendable funds, local and national economic conditions, current interest rate levels, and loan demand. As described above, Columbia competes with larger commercial banks by emphasizing a community bank orientation and personal service to customers.
A potential new source of competition is the array of on-line banking services offered by traditional commercial banks and other financial service providers, and by newly formed companies that use the Internet to advertise and sell competing products. Columbia offers many on-line banking services to its customers, but management believes that, for the foreseeable future, its customers will continue to prefer the personal, locally-based services that it offers.
Employees
As of December 31, 2003, Columbia had a total of 272 full-time equivalent employees. This number of employees, which compares to 274 at December 31, 2002, has held steady, even though Columbia has grown its branch network, due to increased efficiencies in administrative functions and expansion of technology. None of the employees are subject to a collective bargaining agreement. Columbia considers its relationships with its employees to be good.
Directors and Executive Officers
Information regarding Columbias executive officers and Board of Directors is set forth in Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant, in Item 10, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Website Access to Reports
Columbia makes available all periodic and current reports, free of charge, on its website as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Columbias website address is www.columbiabancorp.com. The contents of the website are not incorporated into this report or into Columbias other filings with the SEC.
8
SUPERVISION AND REGULATION
General
Columbia is extensively regulated under federal and state law. These laws and regulations are primarily intended to protect depositors, not shareholders. The discussion below describes and summarizes certain statutes and regulations. These descriptions and summaries are qualified in their entirety by reference to the particular statute or regulation. Changes in applicable laws or regulations may have a material effect on the business and prospects of Columbia. The operations of Columbia may also be affected by changes in the policies of banking and other government regulators. Columbia cannot accurately predict the nature or extent of the effects on its business and earnings that fiscal or monetary policies, or new federal or state laws, may have in the future.
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Modernization Act
In 1999 Congress passed the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Modernization Act (the FSMA). This new legislation repealed certain provisions of the Glass-Steagall Act that had required the separation of the banking, insurance and securities businesses. It also created a new business structure known as a financial services holding company. Under this new law, banks will have broader opportunities to affiliate with insurance and securities companies. Banks could also become tempting acquisition targets, as insurance and securities companies seek such affiliations themselves. The FSMA may also encourage local jurisdictions to enact tighter bank privacy provisions. The enactment and implementation of the FSMA will result in new competitive challenges and opportunities for community banks in the coming years.
Columbia is a financial services holding company under the FSMA and is therefore subject to supervision of, and regulation by, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve). Columbia is examined by, must file annual reports with, and provide the Federal Reserve with any additional information as it may require. Financial holding companies are bank holding companies that satisfy certain criteria and are permitted to engage in activities that traditional bank holding companies are not.
Holding Company Bank Ownership. The Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (the BHCA) requires every bank holding company to obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve before (i) acquiring, directly or indirectly, ownership or control of any voting shares of another bank or bank holding company if, after such acquisition, it would own or control more than 5% of such shares, (ii) acquiring all or substantially all of the assets of another bank or bank holding company, or (iii) merging or consolidating with another bank or bank holding company.
Holding Company Control of Nonbanks. With some exceptions, the BHCA also prohibits a bank holding company from acquiring or retaining direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of any company which is not a bank or bank holding company, or from engaging directly or indirectly in activities other than those of banking, managing, or controlling banks, or providing services for its subsidiaries. The principal exceptions to these prohibitions involve certain nonbank activities which, by statute or by Federal Reserve regulation or order, have been identified as activities closely related to the business of banking or of managing or controlling banks. In making this determination, the Federal Reserve considers whether the performance of such activities by a bank holding company can be expected to produce benefits to the public such as greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in the efficient use of resources, which can be expected to outweigh the risks of possible adverse effects such as decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interest, or unsound banking practices. The Economic Growth and Regulatory Reduction Act of 1996 amended the BHCA to eliminate the requirement that bank holding companies seek prior Federal Reserve approval before engaging in certain permissible nonbanking activities if the holding company is well capitalized and meets certain other specific criteria.
Transactions with Affiliates. Subsidiary banks of a bank holding company are subject to restrictions imposed by the Federal Reserve Act on extensions of credit to the holding company or its subsidiaries, on investments in their securities, and on the use of their securities as collateral for loans to any borrower. These regulations and restrictions may limit Columbias ability to obtain funds from CRB for its cash needs, including funds for payment of dividends, interest, and operational expenses.
9
Tying Arrangements. Under the Federal Reserve Act and certain regulations of the Federal Reserve, a bank holding company and its subsidiaries are prohibited from engaging in certain tying arrangements in connection with any extension of credit, lease or sale of property, or furnishing of services. For example, CRB may not generally require a customer to obtain other services from it or from Columbia, and may not require that the customer promise not to obtain other services from a competitor as a condition to an extension of credit to the customer.
Federal and State Bank Regulation
General. CRB is an Oregon state-chartered bank with deposits insured by the FDIC, and is subject to the supervision and regulation of the Oregon Director of Banks and the FDIC. CRB is also subject to the supervision and regulation of the Washington Department of Financial Institutions. These agencies have the authority to prohibit banks from engaging in what they believe constitute unsafe or unsound banking practices.
CRA. The Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) requires that, in connection with examinations of financial institutions within their jurisdiction, the Federal Reserve or the FDIC evaluate the records of financial institutions in meeting the credit needs of their local communities, including low and moderate income neighborhoods, consistent with the safe and sound operation of those banks. These factors are also considered in evaluating mergers, acquisitions, and applications to open a branch or facility.
Insider Credit Transactions. Banks are also subject to certain restrictions imposed by the Federal Reserve Act on extensions of credit to executive officers, directors, principal shareholders, or any related interests of such persons. Extensions of credit (i) must be made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, and follow credit underwriting procedures that are not less stringent than those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with persons not covered above and who are not employees; and (ii) must not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features. Banks are also subject to certain lending limits and restrictions on overdrafts to such persons. A violation of these restrictions may result in the assessment of substantial civil monetary penalties on the affected bank or any officer, director, employee, agent, or other person participating in the conduct of the affairs of that bank; the imposition of a cease and desist order; and other regulatory sanctions.
FDICIA. Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act (FDICIA), each federal banking agency has prescribed, by regulation, noncapital safety and soundness standards for institutions under its authority. These standards cover internal controls, information systems, and internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth, compensation, fees and benefits, such other operational and managerial standards as the agency determines to be appropriate, and standards for asset quality, earnings and stock valuation. An institution which fails to meet these standards must develop a plan acceptable to the agency, specifying the steps that the institution will take to meet the standards. Failure to submit or implement such a plan may subject the institution to regulatory sanctions. Management believes that CRB meets all such standards and, therefore, does not believe that these regulatory standards materially affect Columbias business operations.
Interstate Banking and Branching
The Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 (Interstate Act) permits nationwide interstate banking and branching under certain circumstances. This legislation generally authorizes interstate branching and relaxes federal law restrictions on interstate banking. Currently, financial holding companies may purchase banks in any state, and states may not prohibit such purchases. Additionally, banks are permitted to merge with banks in other states as long as the home state of neither merging bank has opted out. The Interstate Act requires regulators to consult with community organizations before permitting an interstate institution to close a branch in a low-income area.
Under recent FDIC regulations, banks are prohibited from using their interstate branches primarily for deposit production. The FDIC has accordingly implemented a loan-to-deposit ratio screen to ensure compliance with this prohibition.
Oregon and Washington each enacted opting in legislation in accordance with the Interstate Act
10
provisions allowing banks to engage in interstate merger transactions subject to certain aging requirements. In both states, branches may not be acquired or opened separately in the home state by an out-of-state bank, but once an out-of-state bank has acquired a bank within the state, either through merger or acquisition of all or substantially all of the banks assets, the out-of-state bank may open additional branches within the home state.
Deposit Insurance
The deposits of CRB are currently insured to a maximum of $100,000 per depositor through the Bank Insurance Fund (BIF) administered by the FDIC. CRB is required to pay semi-annual deposit insurance premium assessments to the FDIC.
The FDICIA included provisions to reform the Federal Deposit Insurance System, including the implementation of risk-based deposit insurance premiums. The FDICIA also permits the FDIC to make special assessments on insured depository institutions in amounts determined by the FDIC to be necessary to give it adequate assessment income to repay amounts borrowed from the U.S. Treasury and other sources, or for any other purpose the FDIC deems necessary. The FDIC has implemented a risk-based insurance premium system under which banks are assessed insurance premiums based on how much risk they present to the BIF. Banks with higher levels of capital and a low degree of supervisory concern are assessed lower premiums than banks with lower levels of capital or a higher degree of supervisory concern.
Dividends
The principal source of Columbias cash revenues is dividends received from its subsidiary. The payment of dividends is subject to government regulation, in that regulatory authorities may prohibit banks and financial holding companies from paying dividends which would constitute an unsafe or unsound banking practice. In addition, a bank may not pay cash dividends if that payment could reduce the amount of its capital below that necessary to meet minimum applicable regulatory capital requirements. Also, under the Oregon Bank Act, the Oregon Director of Banks may suspend the payment of dividends if it is determined that the payment would cause a banks remaining shareholders equity to be inadequate for the safe and sound operation of the bank. Other than the laws and regulations noted above, which apply to all banks and financial holding companies, neither Columbia nor CRB is currently subject to any regulatory restrictions on their dividends.
Capital Adequacy
Federal bank regulatory agencies use capital adequacy guidelines in the examination and regulation of financial holding companies and banks. If capital falls below minimum guideline levels, the holding company or bank may be denied approval to acquire or establish additional banks or nonbank businesses or to open new facilities.
The FDIC and Federal Reserve use risk-based capital guidelines for banks and financial holding companies. These are designed to make such capital requirements more sensitive to differences in risk profiles among banks and financial holding companies, to account for off-balance sheet exposure, and to minimize disincentives for holding liquid assets. Assets and off-balance sheet items are assigned to broad risk categories, each with appropriate weights. The resulting capital ratios represent capital as a percentage of total risk-weighted assets and off-balance sheet items. The guidelines are minimums, and the Federal Reserve has noted that financial holding companies contemplating significant expansion programs should not allow expansion to diminish their capital ratios and should maintain ratios well in excess of the minimum. The current guidelines require all financial holding companies and federally regulated banks to maintain a minimum risk-based total capital ratio equal to 8%, of which at least 4% must be Tier I capital.
Tier I capital for financial holding companies includes common shareholders equity, qualifying perpetual preferred stock (up to 25% of total Tier I capital, if cumulative, although under a Federal Reserve Rule, redeemable perpetual preferred stock may not be counted as Tier I capital unless the redemption is subject to the prior approval of the Federal Reserve), and minority interests in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, less intangibles. Tier II capital includes: (i) the allowance for loan losses of up to 1.25% of risk-weighted assets; (ii) any qualifying perpetual preferred stock which exceeds the amount which may be included in Tier I capital; (iii) hybrid capital instruments; (iv) perpetual debt; (v) mandatory convertible securities; and (vi) subordinated debt and intermediate term preferred stock of up
11
to 50% of Tier I capital. Total capital is the sum of Tier I and Tier II capital, less reciprocal holdings of other banking organizations, capital instruments, and investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries.
The assets of banks and financial holding companies receive risk-weights of 0%, 20%, 50%, and 100%. In addition, certain off-balance sheet items are given credit conversion factors to convert them to asset equivalent amounts to which an appropriate risk-weight will apply. These computations result in total risk-weighted assets.
Most loans are assigned to the 100% risk category, except for first mortgage loans fully secured by residential property which carry a 50% rating. Most investment securities are assigned to the 20% category, except for municipal or state revenue bonds which have a 50% risk-weight, and direct obligations of, or obligations guaranteed by, the United States Treasury or agencies of the federal government which have 0% risk-weight. In converting off-balance sheet items, direct credit substitutes, including general guarantees and standby letters of credit backing financial obligations, are given a 100% conversion factor. Transaction related contingencies such as bid bonds, other standby letters of credit and undrawn commitments, including commercial credit lines with an initial maturity of more than one year, have a 50% conversion factor. Short-term, self-liquidating trade contingencies are converted at 20%, and short-term commitments have a 0% factor.
The Federal Reserve also employs a leverage ratio, which is Tier I capital as a percentage of total assets less intangibles, to be used as a supplement to risk-based guidelines. The principal objective of the leverage ratio is to constrain the maximum degree to which a financial holding company may leverage its equity capital base. The Federal Reserve requires a minimum leverage ratio of 3%. However, for all but the most highly rated financial holding companies and for financial holding companies seeking to expand, the Federal Reserve expects an additional cushion of at least 1% to 2%.
The FDICIA created a statutory framework of supervisory actions indexed to the capital level of the individual institution. Under regulations adopted by the FDIC, an institution is assigned to one of five capital categories depending on its total risk-based capital ratio, Tier I risk-based capital ratio, and leverage ratio, together with certain subjective factors. Institutions which are deemed to be undercapitalized, depending on the category to which they are assigned, are subject to certain mandatory supervisory corrective actions.
Effects of Government Monetary Policy
The earnings and growth of Columbia are affected not only by general economic conditions but also by the fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government, particularly the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve can and does implement national monetary policy for such purposes as curbing inflation and combating recession, but its open market operations in U.S. government securities, control of the discount rate applicable to borrowings from the Federal Reserve, and establishment of reserve requirements against certain deposits, influence the growth of bank loans, investments and deposits, and also affect interest rates charged on loans or paid on deposits. The nature and impact of future changes in monetary policies and their impact on Columbia cannot be predicted with certainty.
Changes in Banking Laws and Regulations
The laws and regulations that affect banks and financial holding companies frequently undergo significant changes at the federal and state levels. Bills are introduced from time to time in the United States Congress that contain proposals to alter the structure, regulation, and competitive relationships of the nations financial institutions. Any changes in laws and regulations could have the effect of increasing or decreasing the cost of doing business, limiting or expanding permissible activities (including activities in the insurance and securities fields), or affecting the competitive balance among banks, savings associations, and other financial institutions. Such changes could also reduce the extent of federal deposit insurance, broaden the powers or the geographical range of operations of financial holding companies, alter the extent to which banks could engage in securities activities, alter the taxation of banks, financial holding companies and other financial services organizations, and change the structure and jurisdiction of various financial institution regulatory agencies. Management cannot anticipate or predict specific ongoing changes in laws and regulations or the extent to which they might affect its business.
12
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Nine of Columbias facilities in Hood River, The Dalles, Redmond, Bend, McMinnville, Madras, Hermiston and Pendleton Oregon, as well as its two full-service branch facilities in White Salmon and Goldendale, Washington, are housed in properties owned, free of all encumbrances, by Columbia. Columbia leases the space for its Canby, Newberg and Kennewick branches, both McMinnville and Bend limited-service branches in retirement communities, its facility in The Dalles Safeway store and the Administration office located in The Dalles. All of Columbias branches, except the Westside branch in The Dalles, Oregon and its limited service branches, have drive-up facilities and automated teller machines. The Mortgage Team operates from the second floor of Columbias Bend branch; 1701 NE Third Street. The following sets forth certain information regarding Columbias branch facilities.
Year | ||||||||
Square | Opened or | Occupancy | ||||||
City and County | Address | Feet | Acquired | Status | ||||
Oregon Branches | ||||||||
The Dalles (Main Branch), Wasco County | 316 East Third Street | 8,000 | 1977 | Owned | ||||
The Dalles (Westside Branch),(1) Wasco County | 520 Mt. Hood Street | 430 | 1986 | Leased | ||||
Hood River Branch, Hood River County | 2650 Cascade Avenue | 6,255 | 1993 | Owned | ||||
Madras Branch, Jefferson County | 624 SW Fourth Street | 7,400 | 1995 | Owned | ||||
Redmond Branch, Deschutes County | 434 North Fifth Street | 4,700 | 1995 | Owned | ||||
Bend Branch, Deschutes County | 1701 NE Third Street | 8,306 | 1996 | Owned | ||||
Shevlin Center Branch,(2) Deschutes County | 925 SW Emkay Drive | 15,000 | 1999 | Owned | ||||
Bend Limited Facility, Deschutes County | 1010 NE Purcell Blvd | 80 | 2002 | Other(3) | ||||
Hermiston Branch, Umatilla County | 1033 South Highway 395 | 4,700 | 1998 | Owned | ||||
Pendleton Branch, Umatilla County | 2101 SW Court Place | 4,700 | 1999 | Owned | ||||
McMinnville Branch,(2) Yamhill County | 723 N Baker | 9,600 | 1998 | Owned | ||||
McMinnville Limited Facility, Yamhill County | 900 NW Hill Road | 60 | 1998 | Other(3) | ||||
McMinnville Limited Facility, Yamhill County | 300 NW Hillside Pkwy | 60 | 2001 | Other(3) | ||||
Canby Branch, Clackamas County | 223 NE 2nd Street | 1,500 | 2001 | Leased | ||||
Newberg Branch, Yamhill County | 901 N Brutscher St., Ste A | 3,900 | 1999 | Leased |
13
Year | ||||||||
Square | Opened or | Occupancy | ||||||
City and County | Address | Feet | Acquired | Status | ||||
Washington Branches | ||||||||
White Salmon Branch, Klickitat County | 390 NE Tohomish Street | 5,500 | 1996 | Owned | ||||
Goldendale Branch, Klickitat County | 202 West Main Street | 6,105 | 1996 | Owned | ||||
Kennewick Branch, Benton County Other Facilities |
1408 N Louisiana Street
Suite 102-103
|
2,600 | 2003 | Leased | ||||
The Dalles, OR, Administration, Wasco County | 401 E Third St, Suite 200 | 14,868 | 2002 | Leased |
(1) | Leased space in a Safeway supermarket. Lease term expires December 2005. | |
(2) | Branch operations are located on the first floor. A portion of the second floor is leased to other parties. | |
(3) | CRB has an agreement in place that does not require financial payment for these limited-branch facilities. |
In 1999, Columbia purchased 156,723 square feet of bare land in the Columbia River Center in The Dalles for future branch or administrative operations expansion. Columbia also purchased bare land in 1995, adjacent to the Hood River Branch, for the purpose of future parking expansion. After the completion of the parking expansion in 2001, Columbia partitioned the land and currently has 13,068 square feet listed for sale. In 2003, Columbia closed its mortgage lending office in Newport, Oregon due to the declining volume of mortgage transactions generated through that office.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Management is not presently aware of any pending or threatened claims against Columbia that, if determined adversely to Columbia, would have a material affect on its operations or performance. In the normal course of its business, Columbia is a party to various debtor-creditor legal actions, none of which, individually or in the aggregate, are presently material to Columbias business, operations or financial condition. These include cases filed as a plaintiff in collection and foreclosure cases, and the enforcement of creditors rights in bankruptcy proceedings.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted to a vote of securities holders of Columbia during the quarter ended December 31, 2003.
Part II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS
The common stock of Columbia Bancorp trades on the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol CBBO. Trading in Columbias stock on NASDAQ commenced on November 6, 1998. The respective high and low sale prices of Columbias common stock for the periods indicated are shown below. All prices for the periods shown have been adjusted for subsequent stock splits. Prices do not include retail markups, markdowns, or commissions, and may not represent actual transactions. Columbia has paid dividends on its common stock on a quarterly basis. The table below also sets forth dividends declared per share of common stock for the periods indicated. As of February 17, 2004 Columbia had 8,780,109 shares issued and outstanding, which were held by approximately 2,863 shareholders of record.
14
Table 1
2003 (1) | 2002 (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Trading Range | Stock Trading Range | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Dividend | Cash Dividend | |||||||||||||||||||||||
High | Low | Declared | High | Low | Declared | |||||||||||||||||||
First Quarter |
$ | 15.23 | $ | 13.00 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 10.36 | $ | 9.15 | $ | 0.07 | ||||||||||||
Second Quarter |
16.05 | 12.75 | 0.08 | 11.95 | 9.96 | 0.07 | ||||||||||||||||||
Third Quarter |
14.98 | 13.10 | 0.08 | 12.65 | 9.91 | 0.07 | ||||||||||||||||||
Fourth Quarter |
17.53 | 14.40 | 0.09 | 13.68 | 10.68 | 0.07 |
(1) Prior periods have been adjusted to reflect the 10% stock dividend, effective May 1, 2003.
Sales of Unregistered Securities
Columbia had no recent sales of unregistered securities during the fourth quarter of 2003.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth certain information concerning the consolidated financial condition, operating results, and key operating ratios for Columbia at the dates and for the periods indicated. This information does not purport to be complete, and should be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and the Consolidated Financial Statements of Columbia and Notes thereto.
Table 2
As of and For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands except dollars per share data) | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | ||||||||||||||||
Income Statement Data |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 38,230 | $ | 37,616 | $ | 35,078 | $ | 33,367 | $ | 26,883 | |||||||||||
Interest expense |
6,831 | 7,782 | 11,583 | 12,256 | 8,568 | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
31,399 | 29,834 | 23,495 | 21,111 | 18,315 | ||||||||||||||||
Loan loss provision |
2,575 | 1,800 | 1,450 | 1,697 | 1,005 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
9,834 | 9,381 | 7,374 | 5,624 | 5,013 | ||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities |
$ | 31,682 | $ | 36,048 | $ | 43,532 | $ | 60,544 | $ | 62,333 | |||||||||||
Total loans, net |
464,350 | 432,687 | 380,283 | 299,881 | 246,975 | ||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
584,136 | 544,326 | 482,207 | 416,859 | 361,241 | ||||||||||||||||
Total deposits |
496,358 | 458,624 | 394,636 | 346,427 | 310,910 | ||||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity |
57,804 | 50,190 | 46,445 | 41,326 | 37,322 | ||||||||||||||||
Per Share Data |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings per common share |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per common share (1) |
$ | 1.13 | $ | 1.05 | $ | 0.83 | $ | 0.63 | $ | 0.57 | |||||||||||
Diluted earnings per common share (1) |
1.09 | 1.03 | 0.81 | 0.63 | 0.56 | ||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared per common share (1) |
0.32 | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.25 | 0.22 | ||||||||||||||||
Book value per common share (1) |
6.61 | 5.80 | 5.25 | 4.68 | 4.24 | ||||||||||||||||
Capital Ratios |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Tier I capital ratio (2) |
10.46 | % | 9.71 | % | 9.36 | % | 9.78 | % | 10.17 | % | |||||||||||
Total risk-based capital ratio (3) |
11.71 | % | 10.96 | % | 10.61 | % | 11.03 | % | 11.32 | % | |||||||||||
Leverage ratio (4) |
9.19 | % | 8.57 | % | 8.61 | % | 8.14 | % | 8.26 | % | |||||||||||
Financial Ratios |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Return on average assets |
1.71 | % | 1.80 | % | 1.64 | % | 1.41 | % | 1.44 | % | |||||||||||
Return on average equity |
18.25 | % | 18.80 | % | 16.76 | % | 14.40 | % | 13.90 | % |
(1) Prior periods have been adjusted to reflect the 10% stock dividend, effective May 1, 2003.
(2) Tier I capital divided by risk-weighted assets.
(3) Total regulatory capital divided by risk-weighted assets.
(4) Tier I capital divided by average total assets.
15
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with Columbia Bancorps (Columbia) audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003 included elsewhere in this report.
Columbia is a financial holding company which conducts operations principally through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Columbia River Bank (CRB). CRB is a state chartered bank which offers a broad range of services to its customers, primarily small and medium sized businesses, farmers, and individuals. CRB has a network of 18 branches, 12 full-service branch facilities and three limited-service branch facilities in Oregon serve the northern and eastern Oregon communities of The Dalles (2), Hood River, Pendleton and Hermiston, the central Oregon communities of Madras, Redmond, and Bend (3), and the communities of McMinnville (3), Canby and Newberg in the Willamette Valley. Columbias three south central Washington full-service branches serve the communities of Goldendale, White Salmon and Kennewick.
On December 19, 2002, Columbia formed Columbia Bancorp Trust I (Trust), a wholly-owned Delaware statutory business trust, for purposes of issuing Trust Preferred Securities. The Trust issued $4.0 million of trust-preferred securities at a floating rate indexed to the 90 day LIBOR with a margin of 3.30%. These securities are considered to be Tier I for regulatory capital purposes.
Managements goal is to grow Columbias earning assets while maintaining a high return on equity and high asset quality. The key to this, in managements view, is to emphasize personalized, quality banking products and services for its customers, to hire and retain competent branch and administrative personnel, and to respond quickly to customer demand and growth opportunities. Management also intends to increase Columbias penetration in our existing markets, and to expand into new markets through suitable acquisitions and new branch openings.
As of December 31, 2003, Columbia had total assets of $584.14 million, total deposits of $496.36 million and shareholders equity of $57.80 million. As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, total assets were $544.33 million and $482.21 million; total deposits were $458.62 million and $394.64 million, and shareholders equity were $50.19 million and $46.45 million, respectively. Columbias net income for years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, was $9.83 million, $9.38 million and $7.37 million, respectively. Columbias year 2003 net income represents the seventeenth consecutive year of increasing net income. For the year ended December 31, 2003, Columbias return on average assets was 1.71% and return on average equity was 18.25%, as compared to 2002 and 2001, where return on average assets were 1.80% and 1.64% and return on average equity were 18.80% and 16.76%, respectively.
16
Return on average daily assets and equity and certain other ratios for the periods indicated are presented below:
Table 3
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 9,834 | $ | 9,381 | $ | 7,374 | $ | 5,624 | $ | 5,013 | ||||||||||
Average assets |
573,934 | 521,537 | 450,262 | 398,422 | 347,003 | |||||||||||||||
RETURN ON AVERAGE ASSETS |
1.71 | % | 1.80 | % | 1.64 | % | 1.41 | % | 1.44 | % | ||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 9,834 | $ | 9,381 | $ | 7,374 | $ | 5,624 | $ | 5,013 | ||||||||||
Average equity |
53,898 | 49,905 | 43,990 | 39,062 | 36,075 | |||||||||||||||
RETURN ON AVERAGE EQUITY |
18.25 | % | 18.80 | % | 16.76 | % | 14.40 | % | 13.90 | % | ||||||||||
Cash dividends declared and paid |
$ | 2,819 | $ | 2,580 | $ | 2,570 | $ | 2,326 | $ | 1,999 | ||||||||||
Net income |
9,834 | 9,381 | 7,374 | 5,624 | 5,013 | |||||||||||||||
PAYOUT RATIO |
28.66 | % | 27.50 | % | 34.85 | % | 41.36 | % | 39.88 | % | ||||||||||
Average equity |
$ | 53,898 | $ | 49,905 | $ | 43,990 | $ | 39,062 | $ | 36,075 | ||||||||||
Average assets |
573,934 | 521,537 | 450,262 | 398,422 | 347,003 | |||||||||||||||
AVERAGE EQUITY TO ASSET RATIO |
9.39 | % | 9.13 | % | 9.77 | % | 9.80 | % | 10.40 | % |
Critical accounting policies and estimates
The Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, as well as disclosures included elsewhere in this Form 10-K, are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates the estimates used, including the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses, impairment of intangible assets, and contingencies and litigation. Estimates are based upon historical experience, current economic conditions and other factors that management considers reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates result in judgments regarding the carrying values of assets and liabilities when these values are not readily available from other sources as well as assessing and identifying the accounting treatments of commitments and contingencies. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The following critical accounting policies involve the more significant judgments and assumptions used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.
The allowance for loan and lease losses is established to absorb known and inherent losses attributable to loans and leases outstanding and related off-balance-sheet commitments. The adequacy of the allowance is monitored on an ongoing basis and is based on managements evaluation of numerous factors. These factors include the quality of the current loan portfolio, the trend in the loan portfolios risk ratings, current economic conditions, loan concentrations, loan growth rates, past-due and nonperforming trends, evaluation of specific loss estimates for all significant problem loans, historical charge-off and recovery experience and other pertinent information. Approximately 63% of Columbias gross loan portfolio is secured by real estate and a significant depreciation in real estate values in Oregon and Washington would cause management to increase the allowance for loan and lease losses.
During 2003 and prior years, Columbia capitalized service retained mortgage premiums which resulted in recognition of a mortgage servicing asset (MSA) and a corresponding recognition of servicing income. The MSA has been valued on a quarterly basis by a qualified, third party with access and knowledge of current servicing portfolio values in the market place.. The techniques used in valuing the MSA incorporate assumptions relative to prevailing conditions in the secondary servicing market. These assumptions have been dependent upon near term transactions and include prepayment speed forecasts, market discount rates, earning rates, servicing costs, acquisition costs and ancillary income. A calculated decrease in the value of the MSA is recorded as a valuation write-down adjustment. However, actual fair
17
values may differ from the measured valuation due to limitations in available third-party market quotations and potential changes in the underlying assumptions. Mortgage servicing assets have been amortized over the expected life of the outstanding net servicing income. The expected life of the outstanding net servicing income that is generated from the MSA can vary from managements estimates due to interest rate volatility and changing prepayment speeds. Prepayment speeds in excess of managements estimates could negatively impact the recorded value of the MSA.
Columbia initiated a strategic shift in the fourth quarter of 2003 and discontinued the practice of capitalizing service retained mortgage premiums. Columbia River Bank Mortgage Team (Mortgage Team) now originates mortgage loans which are sold exclusively on a brokerage basis with mortgage servicing released. . This means the existing MSA balance will not increase as a result of additional mortgage loan activity in which mortgage premiums are retained. . This strategy will continue into 2004 with a focus on producing quality loans, providing competitive loan products, and selling service released mortgage premiums in the secondary servicing market. Management believes this will reduce interest rate risk associated with the MSA.. Any future decision to sell the MSA will be dependent upon the movement of interest rates. A rise in interest rates in 2004 will likely improve the value of the MSA and provide management with the ability to examine sale options.
At December 31, 2003, Columbia had approximately $7.4 million in goodwill as a result of business combinations. Columbia adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142 on January 1, 2002. Annual and periodic analyses of the fair value of recorded goodwill for impairment will involve judgment on the part of management.
Columbia applies Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations in accounting for its stock option plans. Accordingly, compensation costs are recognized as the difference between the exercise price of each option and the market price of Columbias stock at the date of each grant. Had compensation cost for Columbias 2003, 2002, and 2001 grants for stock-based compensation plans been determined consistent with SFAS No. 123, its net income and earnings per common share for December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001, would approximate the pro forma amounts below.
Table 4
(dollars in thousands except per share data) | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
Net income: |
|||||||||||||
As reported |
$ | 9,834 | $ | 9,381 | $ | 7,374 | |||||||
Pro forma |
$ | 9,657 | $ | 8,570 | $ | 6,823 | |||||||
Basic earnings per common share(1): |
|||||||||||||
As reported |
$ | 1.13 | $ | 1.05 | $ | 0.83 | |||||||
Pro forma |
$ | 1.11 | $ | 0.96 | $ | 0.77 | |||||||
Diluted earnings per common share(1): |
|||||||||||||
As reported |
$ | 1.09 | $ | 1.03 | $ | 0.81 | |||||||
Pro forma |
$ | 1.07 | $ | 0.94 | $ | 0.75 |
(1) Prior periods have been adjusted to reflect the 10% stock dividend, effective May 1, 2003.
The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions for December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001:
Table 5
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
Dividend yield |
2.14 | % | 2.14 | % | 3.00 | % | ||||||
Expected life (years) |
6.00 | 6.00 | 3.32 | |||||||||
Expected volatility |
43.71 | % | 45.25 | % | 29.77 | % | ||||||
Risk-free rate |
3.02 | % | 2.08 | % | 3.74 | % |
18
The effects of applying SFAS No. 123 in the pro forma disclosure are not indicative of future amounts. Additionally, there can be no assurance that the Public Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), the accounting standard setting organization for public companies, will not issue new pronouncements that will change the accounting for stock-based compensation plans in the future.
Columbia may become party to various legal proceedings. These matters have a high degree of uncertainty associated with them. There can be no assurance that the ultimate outcome will not differ materially from Columbias assessment of them. There can also be no assurance that all matters that may be brought against Columbia are known to them at any point in time.
Results of Operations
Net Interest Income
For financial institutions, the primary component of earnings is net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between interest income, principally from loan and investment security portfolios, and interest expense, principally on customer deposits and bank borrowings from other sources, such as trust preferred securities. Changes in net interest income result from changes in volume, spread and margin. Volume refers to the dollar level of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Spread refers to the difference between the yield on interest-earning assets and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest margin is the ratio of net interest income to total average interest-earning assets and is influenced by the relative level of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.
Average Balances and Average Rates Earned and Paid. The following table shows average balances and interest income or interest expense, with the resulting average yield or rates by category of earning assets or interest-bearing liabilities:
Table 6
Year Ended December 31, 2003 | Year Ended December 31, 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest | Average | Interest | Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Income or | Yields or | Average | Income or | Yields or | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Balance | Expense | Rates | Balance | Expense | Rates | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans (1) |
$ | 456,137 | $ | 36,496 | 8.00 | % | $ | 419,608 | $ | 35,334 | 8.42 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Investment securities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable securities |
17,033 | 514 | 3.02 | 18,822 | 1,035 | 5.58 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Nontaxable securities (2) |
15,662 | 1,150 | 7.34 | 17,191 | 1,223 | 7.12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total investment securities (2) |
32,695 | 1,664 | 5.09 | 36,013 | 2,258 | 6.31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning balances due
from banks |
13,444 | 286 | 2.13 | 10,781 | 340 | 3.02 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold |
21,663 | 205 | 0.95 | 6,465 | 99 | 1.53 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning
assets (3) |
523,939 | 38,651 | 7.37 | 472,867 | 38,031 | 8.04 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest earning assets |
49,995 | 48,670 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 573,934 | $ | 521,537 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing checking and
savings accounts |
$ | 219,682 | $ | 1,597 | 0.73 | % | $ | 189,356 | $ | 1,732 | 0.92 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Time deposit & IRAs |
128,719 | 4,023 | 3.13 | 128,731 | 4,696 | 3.54 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Borrowed funds |
29,212 | 1,211 | 4.15 | 35,343 | 1,354 | 3.83 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
377,613 | 6,831 | 1.81 | 353,430 | 7,782 | 2.19 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
138,931 | 114,652 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total deposits and borrowed funds |
516,544 | 468,082 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
3,492 | 3,550 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
520,036 | 471,632 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity |
53,898 | 49,905 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity |
$ | 573,934 | $ | 521,537 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income (taxable equivalent
basis) |
$ | 31,820 | $ | 30,249 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income (as reported) |
$ | 31,399 | $ | 29,834 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average yield on average earning
assets (1) |
7.37 | % | 8.04 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense to average earning
assets |
1.30 | % | 1.64 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin (3) |
6.07 | % | 6.40 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest spread |
5.56 | % | 5.85 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
[Additional columns below]
[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
Year Ended December 31, 2001 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest | Average | |||||||||||||||
Average | Income or | Yields or | ||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Balance | Expense | Rates | |||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Loans (1) |
$ | 348,239 | $ | 32,135 | 9.23 | % | ||||||||||
Investment securities |
||||||||||||||||
Taxable securities |
29,049 | 1,615 | 5.56 | |||||||||||||
Nontaxable securities (2) |
18,375 | 1,320 | 7.18 | |||||||||||||
Total investment securities (2) |
47,424 | 2,935 | 6.19 | |||||||||||||
Interest-earning balances due
from banks |
7,560 | 417 | 5.52 | |||||||||||||
Federal funds sold |
1,101 | 40 | 3.64 | |||||||||||||
Total interest-earning
assets (3) |
404,324 | 35,527 | 8.79 | |||||||||||||
Non-interest earning assets |
45,938 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 450,262 | ||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing checking and
savings accounts |
$ | 158,286 | $ | 3,318 | 2.10 | % | ||||||||||
Time deposit & IRAs |
118,758 | 6,386 | 5.38 | |||||||||||||
Borrowed funds |
34,238 | 1,880 | 5.49 | |||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
311,282 | 11,584 | 3.72 | |||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
91,731 | |||||||||||||||
Total deposits and borrowed funds |
403,013 | |||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
3,259 | |||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
406,272 | |||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity |
43,990 | |||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity |
$ | 450,262 | ||||||||||||||
Net interest income (taxable equivalent
basis) |
$ | 23,943 | ||||||||||||||
Net interest income (as reported) |
$ | 23,495 | ||||||||||||||
Average yield on average earning
assets (1) |
8.79 | % | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense to average earning
assets |
2.87 | % | ||||||||||||||
Net interest margin (3) |
5.92 | % | ||||||||||||||
Net interest spread |
5.07 | % | ||||||||||||||
(1) | Nonaccrual loans and loans held for sale are included in the average balance. | |
(2) | Tax-exempt income has been adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis at a 36.6% rat for 2003 and at a 34% rate for 2002 and 2001. | |
(3) | Net interest margin is computed by dividing net interest income (taxable equivalent basis) by total average earning assets. |
19
Analysis of Changes in Interest Differential. The following table shows the dollar amount of the increase (decrease) in Columbias net interest income and expense and attributes such dollar amounts to changes in volume as well as changes in rates. Rate and volume variances have been allocated proportionally between rate and volume changes:
Table 7
2003 over 2002 | 2002 over 2001 | 2001 over 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) due to | Increase (Decrease) due to | Increase (Decrease) due to | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net | Net | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Volume | Rate | Change | Volume | Rate | Change | Volume | Rate | Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans |
$ | 3,073 | $ | (1,911 | ) | $ | 1,162 | $ | 6,595 | $ | (3,396 | ) | $ | 3,199 | $ | 6,153 | $ | (3,490 | ) | $ | 2,663 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable securities |
(85 | ) | (436 | ) | (521 | ) | (568 | ) | (12 | ) | (580 | ) | (686 | ) | (102 | ) | (788 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Nontaxable securities |
(63 | ) | (15 | ) | (78 | ) | (56 | ) | (7 | ) | (63 | ) | (820 | ) | 784 | (36 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances due from banks |
79 | (134 | ) | (55 | ) | 178 | (255 | ) | (77 | ) | 734 | (792 | ) | (58 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold |
232 | (126 | ) | 106 | 195 | (136 | ) | 59 | (40 | ) | (30 | ) | (70 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
3,236 | (2,622 | ) | 614 | 6,344 | (3,806 | ) | 2,538 | 5,341 | (3,630 | ) | 1,711 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing checking
and savings accounts |
377 | (512 | ) | (135 | ) | 659 | (2,244 | ) | (1,585 | ) | 152 | (1,890 | ) | (1,738 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Time deposits |
(139 | ) | (534 | ) | (673 | ) | 540 | (2,230 | ) | (1,690 | ) | 1,102 | (443 | ) | 659 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Borrowed funds |
(235 | ) | 92 | (143 | ) | 60 | (586 | ) | (526 | ) | 618 | (212 | ) | 406 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
3 | (954 | ) | (951 | ) | 1,259 | (5,060 | ) | (3,801 | ) | 1,872 | (2,545 | ) | (673 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in
net interest income |
$ | 3,233 | $ | (1,668 | ) | $ | 1,565 | $ | 5,085 | $ | 1,254 | $ | 6,339 | $ | 3,469 | $ | (1,085 | ) | $ | 2,384 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income on a tax equivalent basis, before provision for loan losses, for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $31.82 million, an increase of 5.19% compared to net interest income of $30.25 million in 2002, an increase of 26.34% compared to net interest income of $23.94 million in 2001. The overall tax-equivalent earning asset yield was 7.37% in 2003 compared to 8.04% in 2002 and 8.79% in 2001. For the same years, rates on interest-bearing liabilities were 1.81%, 2.19% and 3.72%, respectively. Net interest spread in 2003 was 5.56%, in 2002 it was 5.85% and in 2001 it was 5.07%. The net interest spread for year 2003, decreased 29 basis points over year 2002, due in large part to the effect of falling interest rates lowering yields on earning assets and a reduced ability to parallel reductions in deposit rates.
Total interest-earning assets averaged $523.94 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, compared to $472.87 million and $404.32 million for the corresponding periods in 2002 and 2001. Most of the increase occurred in the loan category. Increases in the loan portfolio are attributed to favorable interest rates and the execution of Columbias strategy to provide personal, quality banking products and services, to hire experienced lending personnel in strategic branch locations and administrative support staff, and to emphasize marketing strategies.
Average loans, which generally carry a higher yield than investment securities and other earning assets, comprised 87.06% of average earning assets during 2003, compared to 88.74% in 2002 and 86.13% in 2001. During the same periods, average yields on loans were 8.00% in 2003, 8.42% in 2002, and 9.23% in 2001. Average investment securities comprised 6.24% of average earning assets in 2003, which was down from 7.62% in 2002 and 11.73% in 2001. Tax equivalent interest yields on investment securities were 4.95% for 2003, 6.31% in 2002 and 6.19% in 2001.
Interest-bearing liabilities averaged $377.61 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, $353.43 million during the same period in 2002 and $311.28 million during the same period in 2001. Interest cost, as a percentage of earning assets, decreased to 1.30% in 2003, compared to 1.64% in 2002 and 2.87% in 2001. The decline in interest cost as a percentage of earning assets resulted from falling interest rates during the previous three years ending 2003. Deposit rates are near historical low levels.
20
Provision for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses represents charges made to earnings to maintain an adequate allowance for loan losses. The allowance is maintained at an amount management believes to be sufficient to absorb losses in the loan portfolio. Factors considered in establishing an appropriate allowance include a careful assessment of the financial condition of the borrower; a realistic determination of the value and adequacy of underlying collateral; the condition of the local economy and the condition of the specific industry of the borrower; a comprehensive analysis of the levels and trends of loan categories; and, a review of delinquent and classified loans. Columbia applies a systematic process for determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, including an internal loan review function and a quarterly analysis of the adequacy of the allowance. The quarterly analysis includes determination of specific potential loss factors on individual classified loans, historical potential loss factors derived from actual net charge-off experience and trends in nonperforming loans, and potential loss factors for other loan portfolio risks such as loan concentrations, the condition of the local economy, and the nature and volume of loans. For the year ended December 31, 2003 the allowance for loan losses totaled $6.61 million, compared to $6.42 million at December 31, 2002, and $5.31 million at December 31, 2001. This represents an increase of 3.05% between 2002 and 2003 and an increase of 20.80% between 2001 and 2002. A more detailed review of the loan loss provision and allowance for loan losses is presented in Table 13.
The recorded values of loans actually removed from the consolidated balance sheets are referred to as charge-offs and, after netting out recoveries on previously charged-off loans, become net charge-offs. Columbias policy is to charge off loans when, in managements opinion, the loan or a portion thereof is deemed uncollectible, although concerted efforts are made to maximize recovery after the charge-off. When a provision for loan loss is recorded, the amount is based on past charge-off experience, a careful analysis of the current portfolio, and an evaluation of economic trends in Columbias market areas. Management will continue to closely monitor the loan quality of new and existing relationships through stringent review and evaluation procedures and by making loan officers accountable for collection efforts.
For the year ended December 31, 2003, loan charge-offs exceeded recoveries by $2.38 million as compared to 2002 and 2001, when loan charge-offs exceeded recoveries by $695,024 and $716,226, respectively. The increase in loan losses is primarily attributable to the write-down of $1.46 million which is real estate secured. Columbia is working with legal counsel in pursuing a government guarantee, which also supported the outstanding loan balance. The likelihood of success in receiving funds pursuant to the government guarantee is currently not known. Since this guarantee is in dispute, a $1.46 million charge-off was taken to reduce the loan balance to $1.36 million as determined by a re-appraisal of the real estate that secures the loan. Information currently available to management indicates the carrying value of this loan approximates the fair value of collateral and any additional losses relating to this loan are expected to be negligible. Columbia believes this write-down is an unusual or infrequent occurrence.
Noninterest Income
Total noninterest income declined 6.99% from year 2001 through year 2002, but increased 4.36% from year 2002 through 2003. During the prior three years, noninterest income changed from $9.19 million in 2001, to $8.55 million in 2002, and to $8.92 million in 2003. Noninterest income is primarily comprised of five categories; service charges and fees, Mortgage Team net revenues, credit card discounts and fees, CRB Financial Services Team (Financial Services Team) revenues, and other noninterest income. Each of the categories increased during the prior three years, except for Mortgage Team revenues and other noninterest income. Mortgage Team net revenues declined $2.07 million from 2001 to 2002, but increased $238,000 from 2002 to 2003. The increase in Mortgage Team net revenues during 2003 was due to lower amortization expense and valuation write-downs of CRBs mortgage servicing asset. Management attributes this to a slow down in the prepayment rates in mortgage loans serviced due in large part to the slight increase in the mortgage rate environment. Service charges and fees were $4.31 million for the year 2003, compared to $4.09 million for the year 2002, and $3.01 million for the year 2001. The growth in service charges and fees were attributable to growth in deposits and the implementation of an overdraft protection product known as bounce. The bounce product allows demand deposit customers to overdraw their accounts within a pre-established limit for a fee. The remainder of the increases in noninterest income is primarily attributable to improved revenues and growth received from credit card discounts and fees, financial services fee income and net gains on the sale of investment securities.
21
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expenses consist principally of salaries and benefits, occupancy costs, data processing expenses and other noninterest expenses. A measure of Columbias ability to control noninterest expenses is the efficiency ratio. For the year ended December 31, 2003, the efficiency ratio was 55.43%, as compared to 57.26% in 2002 and 60.20% in 2001. The efficiency ratio reflects an improving trend due to growth in revenue from the net interest income and efforts by management to monitor and control overhead expenses.
Noninterest expense for 2003 was $22.35 million, as compared to $21.98 million for 2002 and $19.49 million for 2001. The changes in noninterest expense are primarily the result of an increase in occupancy expense, and other noninterest expenses. The additional increases relate primarily to costs associated with growth in operations and continued investment in technology and communication systems.
Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes was $5.56 million in 2003, $5.22 million in 2002 and $4.38 million in 2001. The provision resulted in effective combined federal and state tax rates of 36.14% in 2003, 35.77% in 2002, and 37.25% in 2001. The effective tax rates differ from combined estimated statutory rates of 38% principally due to the effects of nontaxable interest income, which is recognized for accounting purposes but not for tax purposes.
Table 8 | Summary Balance Sheets |
December 31, | Increase (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 12/31/02 | | 12/31/03 | 12/31/01 | | 12/31/02 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold |
$ | 14,956 | $ | 3,735 | $ | 1,525 | $ | 11,221 | 300.43 | % | $ | 2,210 | 144.92 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investments |
31,682 | 36,048 | 43,532 | (4,366 | ) | (12.11 | ) | (7,484 | ) | (17.19 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total loans, net |
464,350 | 432,687 | 380,283 | 31,663 | 7.32 | 52,404 | 13.78 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other assets (1) |
73,148 | 71,856 | 56,867 | 1,292 | 1.80 | 14,989 | 26.36 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 584,136 | $ | 544,326 | $ | 482,207 | $ | 39,810 | 7.31 | % | $ | 62,119 | 12.88 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing
deposits |
$ | 150,425 | $ | 131,831 | $ | 108,522 | $ | 18,594 | 14.10 | % | $ | 23,309 | 21.48 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits |
345,933 | 326,793 | 286,113 | 19,140 | 5.86 | 40,680 | 14.22 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total deposits |
496,358 | 458,624 | 394,635 | 37,734 | 8.23 | 63,989 | 16.21 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities (2) |
29,974 | 35,512 | 41,127 | (5,538 | ) | (15.59 | ) | (5,615 | ) | (13.65 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
526,332 | 494,136 | 435,762 | 32,196 | 6.52 | 58,374 | 13.40 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY |
57,804 | 50,190 | 46,445 | 7,614 | 15.17 | 3,745 | 8.06 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity |
$ | 584,136 | $ | 544,326 | $ | 482,207 | $ | 39,810 | 7.31 | % | $ | 62,119 | 12.88 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Includes cash and due from banks, property and equipment, and accrued interest receivable.
(2) Includes accrued interest payable and other liabilities.
22
Financial Condition
Investments
A year-to-year comparison shows that Columbias investment securities at December 31, 2003, totaled $31.68 million, compared to $36.05 million at December 31, 2002, and $43.53 million at December 31, 2001. This represents a decrease of 12.11% between 2002 and 2003 and a decrease of 17.19% between 2001 and 2002. The decrease in the investment portfolio is primarily a function of call provisions that were being exercised during the prior two years of falling interest rates. For the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, no single investment security held by Columbia equaled or exceeded 10% of it consolidated shareholders equity. On December 31, 2003, investments in federal funds sold (an overnight investment) were $14.96 million and investments in restricted stock were $2.84 million. The balance of federal funds sold is influenced by cash demands, customer deposit levels, loan activity, and other investment transactions.
Columbia follows a financial accounting principle which requires that investment securities be identified as held-to-maturity or available-for-sale. Held-to-maturity securities are those that Columbia has the intent and ability to hold until they mature or are called. Available-for-sale securities are those that management may sell if liquidity requirements dictate or if alternative investment opportunities arise. Management determines the mix of available-for-sale and held-to-maturity investment securitiesbased on the Board of Directors asset-liability policy, managements assessment of the relative liquidity of Columbia, and other factors.
At December 31, 2003, the investment portfolio, excluding restricted equity securities, consisted of 48.11% available-for-sale securities and 51.89% held-to-maturity securities. At December 31, 2002, the portfolio consisted of 44.23% available-for-sale securities and 55.77% held-to-maturity securities. At December 31, 2001, Columbias investment portfolio, excluding restricted equity securities, consisted of 45.36% available-for-sale securities and 54.64% held-to-maturity securities.
At December 31, 2003, Columbias investment portfolio had total net unrealized gains of approximately $961,000. This compares to net unrealized gains of approximately $1.10 million at December 31, 2002 and net unrealized gains of $707,000 at December 31, 2001. Unrealized gains and losses reflect changes in market conditions and do not represent the amount of actual profits or losses. Actual realized gains and losses occur at the time investment securities are sold or called.
Federal funds sold are short-term investments that mature on a daily basis. Columbia invests in these instruments to provide for additional earnings on excess available cash balances. Because of their short maturities, the balance of federal funds sold fluctuates dramatically on a day-to-day basis. The balance on any one-day is influenced by cash demands, customer deposit levels, loan activity and other investment transactions. Investments in federal funds sold totaled $14.96 million at December 31, 2003, compared to $3.74 million at December 31, 2002, and $1.53 million at December 31, 2001.
23
The following table provides the carrying value of Columbias portfolio of investment securities as of December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively.
Table 9
December 31, | December 31, | December 31, | ||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
Investments available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||||
U.S. Government obligations |
$ | 13,004 | $ | 11,644 | $ | 14,208 | ||||||||
Municipal securities |
793 | 1,727 | 1,997 | |||||||||||
Corporate equity securities |
79 | 113 | 300 | |||||||||||
Corporate debt securities |
| 1,266 | 1,281 | |||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities |
| | 1,016 | |||||||||||
13,876 | 14,750 | 18,802 | ||||||||||||
Investments held-to-maturity: |
||||||||||||||
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
13,016 | 14,748 | 15,742 | |||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
1,867 | 3,770 | 6,916 | |||||||||||
U.S. Government obligations |
81 | 82 | | |||||||||||
14,964 | 18,600 | 22,658 | ||||||||||||
Restricted equity securities |
2,842 | 2,698 | 2,072 | |||||||||||
Total investment securities |
$ | 31,682 | $ | 36,048 | $ | 43,532 | ||||||||
The maturities of investment securities, segmented by amortized cost, estimated fair value, and tax equivalent yields, were as follows as of the dates indicated:
Table 10
December 31, 2003 | December 31, 2002 | December 31, 2001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Estimated | % | Amortized | Estimated | % | Amortized | Estimated | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Cost | Fair Value | Yield (1) | Cost | Fair Value | Yield (1) | Cost | Fair Value | Yield (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasuries and
agencies: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
One year or less |
$ | | $ | | | $ | | $ | | | $ | 1,004 | $ | 1,016 | 1.88 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government
agencies: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
One year or less |
8,402 | 8,458 | 2.27 | % | 9,809 | 10,034 | 2.98 | % | 7,479 | 7,592 | 3.80 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
One to five years |
6,526 | 6,555 | 2.67 | % | 5,461 | 5,530 | 2.50 | % | 11,808 | 12,127 | 4.11 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Five to ten years |
| | | | | | 1,428 | 1,433 | 5.87 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of states
and political
subdivisions: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
One year or less |
865 | 873 | 5.02 | % | 2,212 | 2,250 | 3.38 | % | 1,260 | 1,281 | 3.39 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
One to five years |
2,292 | 2,418 | 3.82 | % | 3,421 | 3,574 | 3.89 | % | 5,133 | 5,257 | 5.18 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Five to ten years |
9,169 | 9,816 | 5.83 | % | 8,228 | 8,684 | 6.04 | % | 4,299 | 4,336 | 6.87 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Over ten years |
1,430 | 1,520 | 6.37 | % | 2,613 | 2,738 | 6.40 | % | 6,993 | 7,022 | 7.23 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate and other debt
securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
One to five years |
| | | 1,229 | 1,266 | 2.57 | % | 1,234 | 1,281 | 4.25 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total debt securities |
28,684 | 29,640 | 3.96 | % | 32,973 | 34,076 | 4.06 | % | 40,638 | 41,345 | 4.99 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate equity securities |
75 | 79 | 113 | 113 | 300 | 300 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted equity securities |
2,843 | 2,843 | 2,698 | 2,698 | 2,072 | 2,072 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total securities |
$ | 31,602 | $ | 32,562 | $ | 35,784 | $ | 36,887 | $ | 43,010 | $ | 43,717 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Weighted average yields are stated on a federal tax equivalent basis at a 36.6% rate for 2003 and at a 34% rate for 2002 and 2001, and have been annualized, where appropriate.
24
Loans
Columbias loan policies and procedures establish the basic guidelines governing its lending operations. Generally, the guidelines address the types of loans that it seeks, target markets, underwriting and collateral requirements, terms, interest rate and yield considerations, and compliance with laws and regulations. All loans or credit lines are subject to approval procedures and amount limitations. These limitations apply to the borrowers total outstanding indebtedness to CRB, including the indebtedness of any guarantor. The policies are reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors of CRB.
Bank officers are charged with loan origination in compliance with underwriting standards overseen by the loan administration department and in conformity with established loan policies. On an annual basis, the Board of Directors determines the lending authority of the President and the Chief Credit Officer, who then delegate lending authority to other lending officers. Such delegated authority may include authority related to loans, letters of credit, overdrafts, uncollected funds, and such other authority as determined by the Board, the President or Chief Credit Officer within their delegated authority.
The Chief Credit Officer has the authority to approve loans up to a lending limit as set by the Board of Directors. All loans above the lending limit of the Chief Credit Officer, and up to a certain limit, are reviewed for approval by the President or Chief Operating Officer. Loans, which exceed this limit, are subject to review and approval by the Boards Loan Committee. All loans approved by the Board Loan Committee are reviewed by the full Board at regularly scheduled meetings. Columbias unsecured legal lending limit was $8.85 million and its real estate secured lending limit was $14.74 million at December 31, 2003. Columbia seldom makes loans for an amount approaching its legal lending limits.
Net outstanding loans totaled $464.35 million at December 31, 2003, representing an increase of $31.66 million, or 7.32% compared to $432.69 million at December 31, 2002. Loan commitments grew to $182.03 million as of December 31, 2003, representing an increase of $15.22 million, or 9.12% over year-end 2002.
Columbias net loan portfolio at December 31, 2003, includes loans secured by real estate 63.74%, commercial loans 18.67%, agricultural loans 13.88%, consumer and other loans 5.46%, deferred loan fees (0.32%) and reserve for loan loss (1.43%). The largest category is concentrated in real estate loans. This is primarily due to the significant growth of mortgage and commercial real estate loan activity. Residential mortgage loans usually are temporarily financed on the balance sheet before being sold to the secondary market. Some commercial loans are secured by real estate, but are used for purposes other than financing the purchase of real property, such as inventory financing and equipment purchases, where real property serves as collateral for the loan.
The following table presents the composition of Columbias loan portfolio, excluding mortgage loans held for sale, at the dates indicated:
Table 11
December 31, 2003 | December 31, 2002 | December 31, 2001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Amount | Percentage | Amount | Percentage | Amount | Percentage | ||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
$ | 86,163 | 18.67 | % | $ | 69,882 | 16.48 | % | $ | 64,163 | 17.76 | % | ||||||||||||||
Agricultural |
64,059 | 13.88 | % | 61,770 | 14.57 | % | 54,934 | 15.20 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Real estate secured loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial property |
125,359 | 27.16 | % | 100,918 | 23.81 | % | 80,092 | 22.17 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Farmland |
42,301 | 9.17 | % | 35,748 | 8.43 | % | 25,292 | 7.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Construction |
87,427 | 18.94 | % | 91,036 | 21.47 | % | 70,474 | 19.50 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Residential |
34,295 | 7.43 | % | 42,688 | 10.07 | % | 44,512 | 12.32 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Home equity lines |
4,799 | 1.04 | % | 2,102 | 0.50 | % | 3,309 | 0.92 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Total real estate |
294,181 | 63.74 | % | 272,492 | 64.28 | % | 223,679 | 61.91 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Consumer |
18,242 | 3.95 | % | 20,937 | 4.94 | % | 19,802 | 5.48 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Other |
6,975 | 1.51 | % | 6,499 | 1.53 | % | 5,251 | 1.45 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Total loans |
469,620 | 101.75 | % | 431,580 | 101.80 | % | 367,829 | 101.80 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Less unearned loan fees |
(1,450 | ) | (0.32 | )% | (1,245 | ) | (0.29 | )% | (1,194 | ) | (0.33 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Less allowance for loan losses |
(6,612 | ) | (1.43 | )% | (6,417 | ) | (1.51 | )% | (5,312 | ) | (1.47 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Loans receivable, net |
$ | 461,558 | 100.00 | % | $ | 423,918 | 100.00 | % | $ | 361,323 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||||||||
Volume change from prior year |
8.88 | % | 17.32 | % | 20.49 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
[Additional columns below]
[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
December 31, 2000 | December 31, 1999 | |||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Amount | Percentage | Amount | Percentage | ||||||||||||||
Commercial |
$ | 70,790 | 23.61 | % | $ | 60,869 | 23.61 | % | ||||||||||
Agricultural |
44,299 | 14.77 | % | 37,775 | 14.77 | % | ||||||||||||
Real estate secured loans: |
||||||||||||||||||
Commercial property |
58,411 | 19.48 | % | 43,469 | 19.48 | % | ||||||||||||
Farmland |
20,723 | 6.91 | % | 13,270 | 6.91 | % | ||||||||||||
Construction |
41,374 | 13.80 | % | 33,780 | 13.80 | % | ||||||||||||
Residential |
45,612 | 15.21 | % | 36,768 | 15.21 | % | ||||||||||||
Home equity lines |
3,393 | 1.13 | % | 3,027 | 1.13 | % | ||||||||||||
Total real estate |
169,513 | 56.53 | % | 130,314 | 56.53 | % | ||||||||||||
Consumer |
19,195 | 6.40 | % | 18,086 | 6.40 | % | ||||||||||||
Other |
1,690 | 0.56 | % | 827 | 0.56 | % | ||||||||||||
Total loans |
305,487 | 101.87 | % | 247,871 | 101.87 | % | ||||||||||||
Less unearned loan fees |
(1,028 | ) | (0.34 | )% | (891 | ) | (0.34 | )% | ||||||||||
Less allowance for loan losses |
(4,578 | ) | (1.53 | )% | (3,298 | ) | (1.53 | )% | ||||||||||
Loans receivable, net |
$ | 299,881 | 100.00 | % | $ | 243,682 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||||
Volume change from prior year |
23.06 | % | 22.62 | % | ||||||||||||||
25
The following table sets forth Columbias loan portfolio maturities, excluding mortgage loans held for sale, on fixed rate loans and repricing dates on variable loans, for the periods indicated:
Table 12
December 31, 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||
One year | ||||||||||||||||||
One year | through | After | Total | |||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | or less | five years | five years | loans | ||||||||||||||
Commercial loans |
$ | 46,734 | $ | 27,829 | $ | 11,600 | $ | 86,163 | ||||||||||
Agricultural loans |
52,050 | 10,806 | 1,203 | 64,059 | ||||||||||||||
Real estate secured loans: |
||||||||||||||||||
Commercial property |
33,266 | 37,078 | 55,015 | 125,359 | ||||||||||||||
Farmland |
7,228 | 12,573 | 22,500 | 42,301 | ||||||||||||||
Construction |
79,510 | 6,632 | 1,285 | 87,427 | ||||||||||||||
Residential |
9,937 | 6,291 | 18,067 | 34,295 | ||||||||||||||
Home equity lines |
2,430 | 428 | 1,941 | 4,799 | ||||||||||||||
Total real estate loans |
132,371 | 63,002 | 98,808 | 294,181 | ||||||||||||||
Consumer |
4,618 | 11,697 | 1,927 | 18,242 | ||||||||||||||
Other |
5,741 | 47 | 1,187 | 6,975 | ||||||||||||||
Total loans |
$ | 241,514 | $ | 113,381 | $ | 114,725 | $ | 469,620 | ||||||||||
Loans with fixed interest rates |
$ | 331,423 | ||||||||||||||||
Loans with floating interest rates |
138,197 | |||||||||||||||||
$ | 469,620 | |||||||||||||||||
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
The reserve for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense based on an overall assessment of Columbias credit portfolio and on the quality of individual loans within that portfolio. The reserve is an amount that management believes will be adequate to absorb possible losses on existing loans that may become uncollectible, based on evaluations of the collectibility of loans and prior loan loss experience. Management charges loans against the reserve when they determine that the principal or a portion thereof may be uncollectible. Accrual of interest is discontinued on a loan when management believes, after considering economic and business conditions, collection efforts and collateral position that the borrowers financial condition is such that collection of interest is doubtful.
Columbia follows guidance from the Interagency Policy Statement issued by the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) regarding Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses Methodologies. On a quarterly basis, management determines the appropriate allowance for loan and lease losses using the following three methodologies:
| Loss allocation to groups of loans by internal risk grade | ||
| Loss allocation by loan type | ||
| Loss allocation by historical loss percentage |
Managements determination of the adequacy of the reserve is based on an assessment of the risk in the portfolio given the conditions at the time. This assessment consists of certain loans and leases being evaluated on an individual basis, as well as all loans being categorized based on common credit risk attributes and as a group. The adequacy of the allowance is monitored on an ongoing basis and is based on managements evaluation of numerous factors. These factors include the quality of the current loan portfolio, the trend in the loan portfolios risk ratings, current economic conditions, loan concentrations, loan growth rates, past-due and non-performing trends, evaluations of specific loss estimates for all
26
significant problem loans, historical charge-off and recovery experience and other pertinent information.
The following table shows Columbias loan loss experience for the periods indicated:
Table 13
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||
Loans outstanding at end of period, net of
unearned loan fees (1) |
$ | 470,962 | $ | 439,104 | $ | 385,595 | $ | 304,459 | $ | 250,274 | ||||||||||||
Average loans outstanding for the period (1) |
$ | 456,137 | $ | 419,608 | $ | 348,239 | $ | 288,058 | $ | 222,276 | ||||||||||||
Reserve for loan losses balance, beginning of year |
$ | 6,417 | $ | 5,312 | $ | 4,578 | $ | 3,298 | $ | 2,380 | ||||||||||||
Loans charged off: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
(417 | ) | (319 | ) | (587 | ) | (139 | ) | (41 | ) | ||||||||||||
Real estate |
(1,569 | ) | (197 | ) | (56 | ) | (14 | ) | (15 | ) | ||||||||||||
Real estate construction |
| (58 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Agriculture |
(40 | ) | (15 | ) | (79 | ) | (256 | ) | (26 | ) | ||||||||||||
Consumer loans |
(412 | ) | (206 | ) | (20 | ) | (8 | ) | (57 | ) | ||||||||||||
Credit card and related accounts |
(96 | ) | (91 | ) | (57 | ) | (42 | ) | (43 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total loans charged off |
(2,534 | ) | (886 | ) | (799 | ) | (459 | ) | (182 | ) | ||||||||||||
Recoveries: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
50 | 97 | 71 | 6 | 32 | |||||||||||||||||
Real estate |
35 | | 1 | | | |||||||||||||||||
Real estate construction |
| 6 | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Agriculture |
28 | 11 | | 30 | 48 | |||||||||||||||||
Consumer loans |
31 | 72 | 5 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||
Credit card and related accounts |
10 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 12 | |||||||||||||||||
Total recoveries |
154 | 191 | 83 | 42 | 95 | |||||||||||||||||
Net charge offs |
(2,380 | ) | (695 | ) | (716 | ) | (417 | ) | (87 | ) | ||||||||||||
Provision charged to operations |
2,575 | 1,800 | 1,450 | 1,697 | 1,005 | |||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses balance, end of period |
$ | 6,612 | $ | 6,417 | $ | 5,312 | $ | 4,578 | $ | 3,298 | ||||||||||||
Ratio of net loans charged-off to
average loans outstanding |
0.52 | % | 0.17 | % | 0.21 | % | 0.14 | % | 0.04 | % | ||||||||||||
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to loans at
end of period |
1.40 | % | 1.46 | % | 1.38 | % | 1.50 | % | 1.32 | % |
(1) Includes loans held-for-sale.
The adequacy of the reserve for loan losses should be measured in the context of several key ratios: (1) the ratio of the reserve to total outstanding loans; (2) the ratio of total nonperforming loans to total loans; and, (3) the ratio of net charge-offs to average loans outstanding. Since 1999, Columbias ratio of the reserve for loan losses to total loans has ranged from 1.32% to 1.50%. The amounts provided by these ratios have been sufficient to fund Columbias charge-offs, which have not been historically significant, and to provide for potential losses as the loan portfolio has grown. These ratios have also been consistent with the level of nonperforming loans to total loans. From December 31, 1999 through December 31, 2003, nonperforming loans to total loans have ranged from a low of 0.18% to a high of 0.71%. This experience tracks with changes in the ratio of the reserve for loan losses to total loans and with the actual balances maintained in the reserve account. Finally, Columbias historical ratio of net charge-offs to average outstanding loans illustrates its favorable loan charge-off and recovery experience. From December 31, 1999 through December 31, 2003, net charge-offs ranged from 0.04% to 0.52% of average loans. Management believes Columbias loan underwriting policies and its loan officers knowledge of their customers are significant contributors to Columbias success in limiting loan losses.
During the year ended December 31, 2003, Columbia recognized $2.53 million in loan losses and $154,034 in recoveries for a net charge-off of $2.38 million. The increase in loan losses is primarily
27
attributable to the write-down of $1.46 million on a single real estate secured loan; the amount of the write-down represents the principal amount of the loan less the appraised value of the related collateral. Columbia is working with legal counsel in pursing a government guarantee, which also supported the outstanding loan balance. The likelihood of success in receiving funds pursuant to the government guarantee is currently not known. Information currently available to management suggests that the carrying value of this loan approximates the fair value of collateral and any additional losses relating to this loan are expected to be negligible. Management believes this write-down is an unusual or infrequent occurrence. Aside from this single loan, net charge-offs were consistent with Columbias historical experience in view of the growth in its loan portfolio.
The following table presents information with respect to nonperforming loans and other assets:
Table 14
December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | ||||||||||||||||
Loans on nonaccrual status |
$ | 3,292 | $ | 742 | $ | 890 | $ | 1,163 | $ | 394 | |||||||||||
Loans past due greater than 90 days |
| 5 | | 7 | | ||||||||||||||||
Restructured loans |
10 | 25 | 113 | 116 | 202 | ||||||||||||||||
Total nonperforming loans |
3,302 | 772 | 1,003 | 1,286 | 596 | ||||||||||||||||
Other real estate owned |
42 | | 349 | | | ||||||||||||||||
Total nonperforming assets |
$ | 3,344 | $ | 772 | $ | 1,352 | $ | 1,286 | $ | 596 | |||||||||||
Allowance for loans losses |
$ | 6,612 | $ | 6,417 | $ | 5,312 | $ | 4,578 | $ | 3,298 | |||||||||||
Ratio of total nonperforming assets to
total assets |
0.57 | % | 0.14 | % | 0.28 | % | 0.31 | % | 0.16 | % | |||||||||||
Ratio of total nonperforming loans to
total loans, net of unearned loan fees |
0.71 | % | 0.18 | % | 0.26 | % | 0.43 | % | 0.24 | % | |||||||||||
Ratio of reserve for loan losses to
total nonperforming assets |
197.74 | % | 830.73 | % | 392.82 | % | 355.95 | % | 553.45 | % |
Columbia has adopted a policy for placement of loans on nonaccrual status after they become 90 days past due unless an exception is made to the policy. Further, management may place loans that are not contractually past due or that are deemed fully collateralized on nonaccrual status to promote better oversight and review of loan arrangements. Loans on nonaccrual status at December 31, 2003 totaled approximately $3,292,000 compared to $742,000 at December 31, 2002 and $890,000 at December 31, 2001. The increase in nonaccrual loans is attributable to the single real estate secured loan for $1.36 million, mentioned above.
Management has adopted procedures to identify and monitor loans that have had their original terms restructured to accommodate borrowers financial needs. Loan revisions and modifications are provided to meet the credit needs of borrowers in weakened financial condition and to enhance ultimate collection. As of December 31, 2003, loans that had been classified as restructured were insignificant and were performing in accordance with their restructured terms. However, management will continue to monitor restructured loans for any changes or deterioration in performance.
At December 31, 2002, 2000, and 1999 Columbia had no assets in the other real estate owned (OREO) category. There was $41,500 in OREO at December 31, 2003 and $349,000 at December 31, 2001, which represents assets acquired through loan foreclosure or recovery activities.
28
Deposits
The following table sets forth composition of Columbias deposit balances for the dates indicated:
Table 15
December 31, 2003 | December 31, 2002 | December 31, 2001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Amount | Percentage | Amount | Percentage | Amount | Percentage | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing demand deposits |
$ | 187,452 | 37.76 | % | $ | 182,341 | 39.76 | % | $ | 136,968 | 34.71 | % | |||||||||||||
Savings deposits |
35,733 | 7.20 | 32,940 | 7.18 | 32,237 | 8.17 | |||||||||||||||||||
Time deposits less than $100,000 |
84,414 | 17.01 | 66,766 | 14.56 | 79,451 | 20.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
Time deposits greater than $100,000 |
38,334 | 7.72 | 44,746 | 9.76 | 37,458 | 9.49 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing
deposits |
345,933 | 69.69 | 326,793 | 71.26 | 286,114 | 72.50 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total noninterest-bearing
deposits |
150,425 | 30.31 | 131,831 | 28.74 | 108,522 | 27.50 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total
interest-bearing and
noninterest-bearing
deposits |
$ | 496,358 | 100.00 | % | $ | 458,624 | 100.00 | % | $ | 394,636 | 100.00 | % | |||||||||||||
At December 31, 2003, total deposits were $496.36 million, an increase of $37.73 million or 8.23%, from total deposits of $458.62 million at December 31, 2002. The total deposits at December 31, 2002 of $458.62 million represent an increase of $63.99 million or $16.21%, from total deposits of $394.64 million at December 31, 2001. Deposit growth in 2003, 2002 and 2001 was due to a combination of pricing strategies, increased marketing and emphasis on the sales culture within the branches. The growth in deposit accounts in 2003 has primarily been in noninterest-bearing and time deposits less than $100,000 accounts. To the extent Columbia can fund operations with noninterest-bearing demand deposits, net interest spread, which is the difference between interest income and interest expense, will improve. At December 31, 2003, core deposits, which consist of all demand deposit accounts, savings accounts and certificates of deposit less than $100,000, accounted for 92.28% of total deposits, up from 90.24% as of December 31, 2002.
Interest-bearing deposits consist of money market, savings, and time certificate accounts. Interest-bearing account balances tend to grow or decline as Columbia adjusts its pricing and product strategies based on market conditions, including competing deposit products. At December 31, 2003, total interest-bearing deposit accounts were $345.93 million, an increase of $19.14 million, or 5.86%, from December 31, 2002. Increases in interest-bearing, savings and time deposits less than $100,000 accounts offset a decline in time deposits in excess of $100,000 accounts. Interest-bearing demand accounts increased $5.11 million, or 2.80%, from December 31, 2002 to 2003, after increasing $45.37 million, or 33.13%, from 2001 to 2002.
29
\
Columbia does utilize brokered deposits as a source for funding future loan growth. In most cases, brokered deposit accounts are purchased with a long-term maturity of two to seven years. Brokered deposits are included in totals for time deposits less than $100,000 and totaled $26.17 million and $16.18 million as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. At December 31, 2003, time certificates of deposits in excess of $100,000 totaled $38.33 million, or 7.72% of total outstanding deposits, compared to $44.75 million, or 9.76%, of total outstanding deposits at December 31, 2002, and $37.46 million, or 9.49%, of total outstanding deposits at December 31, 2001. The following table sets forth, by time remaining to maturity, all time certificates of deposit accounts outstanding at December 31, 2003:
Table 16
Time Deposits | Time Deposits | |||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | less than $100,000 | greater than $100,000 | Total | |||||||||
Three months or less |
$ | 15,303 | $ | 9,706 | $ | 25,009 | ||||||
Over three through six months |
13,337 | 6,483 | 19,820 | |||||||||
Over six months through twelve months |
18,437 | 5,605 | 24,042 | |||||||||
Over twelve months through five years |
35,143 | 16,426 | 51,569 | |||||||||
Over five years |
2,194 | 114 | 2,308 | |||||||||
$ | 84,414 | $ | 38,334 | $ | 122,748 | |||||||
Long-Term and Short-Term Borrowings
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to Columbias Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle borrowings.
Table 17
December 31, | ||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||
Amount outstanding at end of period |
$ | 21,133 | $ | 26,285 | $ | 35,454 | ||||||
Weighted-average interest rate at end of
period |
3.49 | % | 4.16 | % | 4.00 | % | ||||||
Maximum amount outstanding at any
month-end during the year |
$ | 27,372 | $ | 50,622 | $ | 39,172 | ||||||
Average amount outstanding during the
period |
$ | 23,672 | $ | 28,673 | $ | 32,626 | ||||||
Weighted-average interest rate during
the period |
3.90 | % | 4.05 | % | 5.26 | % |
Short-tem borrowings from Treasury, Tax and Loan totaled $850,000, $850,000 and $451,000 at December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
Trust Preferred Securities
In December 2002, Columbia issued $4 million in unsecured subordinated debentures to its wholly-owned subsidiary, Columbia Bancorp Trust I. The interest payments on the subordinated debentures are intended to pass-through Columbia Bancorp Trust I to the beneficial owners of the Columbia Bancorp Trust I (Trust Preferred Securities). The subordinated debentures and trust preferred securities have identical rate, terms and conditions - variable rates tied to the 90 day LIBOR with a margin of 3.30% and 30 year maturities. The Trust Preferred Securities are considered Tier I capital for regulatory purposes. Management entered into this transaction in order to repurchase 328,422 shares of common stock at a price of $12.25 in November 2002 and maintain regulatory capital within the well-capitalized category as defined by the Banks regulators.
30
Shareholders Equity and Regulatory Capital
Shareholders equity increased $7.61 million during 2003. Shareholders equity at December 31, 2003 was $57.80 million compared to $50.19 million at December 31, 2002. This increase reflects net income other and comprehensive income of $9.69 million and $783,000 in exercised stock options. These additions to equity were partially offset by cash dividends paid or declared of $2.82 million.
During 2003, Columbias Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase shares of Columbias common stock valued at up to $1.6 million. Columbia has authorized the repurchase program because the Board of Directors believes in the long-term value of Columbias stock, and that such repurchase constitutes a sound investment use of Columbias funds. During 2003, Columbia repurchased 16,700 shares valued at $247,995. Management expects repurchases to continue from time to time until June 30, 2004.
The Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation have established minimum requirements for capital adequacy for financial holding companies and member banks. The requirements address both risk-based capital and leveraged capital. The regulatory agencies may establish higher minimum requirements if, for example, a corporation has previously received special attention or has a high susceptibility to interest rate risk. The following reflects Columbias various capital ratios at December 31, 2003, and December 31, 2002, as compared to regulatory minimums for capital adequacy purposes:
Table 18
December 31, 2003 | December 31, 2002 | Regulatory Minimum | ||||||||||
Tier I capital |
10.46 | % | 9.71 | % | 4.00 | % | ||||||
Total risk-based capital |
11.71 | % | 10.96 | % | 8.00 | % | ||||||
Leverage ratio |
9.19 | % | 8.57 | % | 4.00 | % |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Columbias management has adopted policies to help maintain liquidity so that we may respond to changes in the financial environment and ensure sufficient funds are available to meet our anticipated cash demands, which ordinarily come from customers needs for borrowing and deposit withdrawals. Generally, Columbias major sources of liquidity are customer deposits, sales and maturities of investment securities, and net cash provided by operating activities. From time to time, Columbia also may draw upon credit lines with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle and correspondent banks, as well as brokered certificates of deposit. Scheduled loan repayments are a relatively stable source of funds, while deposit inflows and unscheduled loan prepayments are not as stable because they are influenced by general interest rate levels, competing interest rates available on other investments, market competition, economic conditions and other factors. Liquid asset balances include cash, amounts due from other banks, federal funds sold and securities available-for-sale and securities held-to-maturity with maturities occurring within three months. At December 31, 2003 these liquid assets totaled $50.66 million or 8.67% of total assets, as compared to $44.54 million or 8.18% of total assets at December 31, 2002. The total liquid assets of $44.54 million or 8.18% of total assets as of December 31, 2002 compare to $41.47 million or 8.61% of total assets at December 31, 2001. As of December 31, 2003 and 2002, unused and available lines of credit totaled $72.95 million and $44.68 million, respectively. Liquidity was stable during the year 2003 as a result of steady deposit growth.
The analysis of liquidity also includes a review of the changes that appear in the consolidated statements of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2003. The statement of cash flows includes operating, investing, and financing categories. Operating activities include net income of $9.83 million, which is adjusted for non-cash items and increases or decreases in cash due to changes in certain assets and liabilities. Investing activities consist primarily of both proceeds from and purchases of securities and the impact of the net growth in loans. Financing activities present the cash flows associated with deposit accounts and reflect various transactions with shareholders.
31
At December 31, 2003, Columbia had outstanding unfunded lending commitments of $182.03 million. Nearly all of these commitments represented unused portions of commitments to extend credit to businesses, credit lines available to consumers under credit card and other arrangements and commercial and standby letters of credit. Many of these credit lines will not be fully drawn upon and, accordingly, the aggregate commitments do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Management believes that Columbias sources of liquidity are sufficient to meet likely calls on outstanding commitments, although there can be no assurance in this regard.
Business Segment Information
Columbia derives revenues from two primary business segments, community banking and mortgage banking. The following table presents financial information about each of these business segments for the three most recent fiscal years.
Table 19
Community | Mortgage | |||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Banking | Banking | Consolidated | |||||||||
December 31, 2003 |
||||||||||||
Net interest income before provision for
loan losses |
$ | 30,998 | $ | 401 | $ | 31,399 | ||||||
Noninterest income |
3,808 | 5,116 | 8,924 | |||||||||
Amortization of the mortgage servicing asset |
| 2,000 | 2,000 | |||||||||
Impairment of mortgage servicing asset |
| 858 | 858 | |||||||||
Salaries and benefits |
10,812 | 2,244 | 13,056 | |||||||||
Occupancy expense, excluding depreciation |
749 | 157 | 906 | |||||||||
Depreciation |
1,250 | 91 | 1,341 | |||||||||
Other noninterest expenses |
6,541 | 506 | 7,047 | |||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes |
15,737 | (339 | ) | 15,398 | ||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 575,463 | $ | 8,673 | $ | 584,136 | ||||||
December 31, 2002 |
||||||||||||
Net interest income before provision for
loan losses |
$ | 29,417 | $ | 417 | $ | 29,834 | ||||||
Noninterest income |
2,780 | 5,771 | 8,551 | |||||||||
Amortization of the mortgage servicing asset |
| 1,029 | 1,029 | |||||||||
Impairment of mortgage servicing asset |
| 2,781 | 2,781 | |||||||||
Salaries and benefits |
10,310 | 2,750 | 13,060 | |||||||||
Occupancy expense, excluding depreciation |
668 | 151 | 819 | |||||||||
Depreciation |
1,141 | 98 | 1,239 | |||||||||
Other noninterest expenses |
4,195 | 657 | 4,852 | |||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes |
15,883 | (1,278 | ) | 14,605 | ||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 526,202 | $ | 18,124 | $ | 544,326 | ||||||
December 31, 2001 |
||||||||||||
Net interest income before provision for
loan losses |
$ | 22,639 | $ | 856 | $ | 23,495 | ||||||
Noninterest income |
3,558 | 5,636 | 9,194 | |||||||||
Amortization of the mortgage servicing asset |
| 395 | 395 | |||||||||
Impairment of mortgage servicing asset |
| 918 | 918 | |||||||||
Salaries and benefits |
8,689 | 2,733 | 11,422 | |||||||||
Occupancy expense, excluding depreciation |
576 | 115 | 691 | |||||||||
Depreciation |
1,065 | 74 | 1,139 | |||||||||
Goodwill amortization |
629 | | 629 | |||||||||
Other noninterest expenses |
5,918 | 455 | 6,373 | |||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes |
9,949 | 1,802 | 11,751 | |||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 452,260 | $ | 29,947 | $ | 482,207 |
32
The Mortgage Team has decreased total assets over the last year to $8.67 million at year end 2003. Assets were $18.12 million and $29.95 million for years ending 2002 and 2001, respectively. Assets of the Mortgage Team are primarily comprised of real estate loans in the portfolio, real estate loans held for sale, mortgage servicing asset, accrued interest receivable, and furniture and equipment. The mortgage servicing asset as of December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, was valued at $3.69 million, $4.61 million and $6.20 million, respectively. CRB uses a qualified independent third party to value the mortgage service asset (MSA) in accordance with Statement of Accounting Standard (SFAS) 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. A qualified independent third party measures the MSA using information obtained from knowledge of the secondary servicing market and assesses current transaction values between willing parties. The techniques used in valuing the MSA incorporate assumptions relative to prevailing conditions in the secondary servicing market. The assumptions used for valuing the MSA are gathered from near term transactions and include prepayment speed forecasts, market discount rates, earning rates, servicing costs, acquisition costs and ancillary income. The mortgage servicing asset is amortized in proportion to and over the period of the estimated life of the net servicing income.
In 2003, the Mortgage Team recorded a loss before income taxes of $339,000. A loss for the year ended December 31, 2002 was $1.28 million; income of $1.80 million was recognized in 2001. The Mortgage Teams earnings in 2003 and 2002 were negatively impacted by higher mortgage servicing asset amortization and valuation write-downs. This was caused by the prevailing low mortgage interest rate environment present during the last three years, which motivated a record number of borrowers to refinance their mortgage loans. Because borrowers refinance their mortgage loans or pay them off early, amortization expense is adjusted to properly match the estimated period of the outstanding net servicing income. In addition, the mortgage servicing asset is periodically valued based on a fair value assessment as measured by a qualified and independent entity with access and knowledge of current servicing portfolio transaction values. During the previous three years ending December 31, 2003, net valuation write-downs were assessed upon the mortgage servicing asset, resulting in corresponding charges to the income statement in the amounts of $917,729, $2.78 million and $858,000, respectively.
Inflation
At this time, Management does not consider the long-term effects of inflation , as measured by the Consumer Price Index, will be material to Columbias financial position and results of operations.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the normal course of business, Columbia utilizes financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk to meet the financing needs of its customers, including loan commitments to extend credit, commercial letters of credit, standby letters of credit, unused portions of VISA credit cards, and commitments to fund mortgage loans.
The increase in off-balance sheet items has occurred during the last three years as a result of growth in the loan portfolio. The table below sets forth the distribution of Columbias contingent liabilities by off-balance sheet type. Commitments to extend credit increased primarily due to growth and expansion of commercial real estate construction lending from our Deschutes County trade area.
Table 20
December 31 | ||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||
Commitments to extend credit |
$ | 162,232 | $ | 148,938 | $ | 119,551 | ||||||
Undisbursed credit card lines of credit |
17,333 | 15,220 | 12,489 | |||||||||
Commercial and standby letters of
credit |
2,466 | 2,654 | 1,866 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 182,031 | $ | 166,812 | $ | 133,906 | ||||||
33
Contractual Obligations
Columbias contractual obligations include notes due to the Federal Home Loan Bank and treasury tax and loan program with the Federal Reserve, trust preferred securities, operating leases, deferred compensation and salary continuation plans. Detailed below is a schedule of Columbias current contractual obligations by maturity and/or payment due:
Table 21
Payment due by Period | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than | More than | Unspecified | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Total | 1 year | 1-3 years | 3-5 years | 5 years | maturity | |||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt obligations
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank notes |
$ | 21,133 | $ | 5,921 | $ | 6,750 | $ | 7,680 | $ | 782 | $ | | |||||||||||||
Trust preferred securities (1) |
4,000 | | | | 4,000 | | |||||||||||||||||||
Treasury tax and loan note |
850 | 850 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations |
2,116 | 285 | 498 | 478 | 855 | | |||||||||||||||||||
Other long term liabilities (2) |
652 | | | | | 652 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 28,751 | $ | 7,056 | $ | 7,248 | $ | 8,158 | $ | 5,637 | $ | 652 | |||||||||||||
(1) Columbia has the right to redeem trust preferred securities on or after January 7, 2008.
(2) Amount includes deferred compensation and salary continuation plan benefit obligations.
Derivative Management
The Mortgage Team has accepted loan applications that often did not fund and close for 30 to 60 days. During this time, the loan has been considered to be in the open mortgage pipeline. Once the loan was either funded or closed, it was then removed from the open mortgage pipeline. The loans that comprise the open mortgage pipeline have been price-locked to the borrower; therefore, interest rate fluctuations may result in gains and/or losses from the sale of loans to the secondary market. The risk of price fluctuations to the open mortgage pipeline is managed by the use of derivative-forward contracts and put options. The underlying securities of the derivatives are mortgage-backed securities, which generally correspond with the composition of the open mortgage pipeline. The structure of the derivatives is intended to serve as a hedge against the impact of rising and falling interest rates. The gain or loss on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk is recognized in earnings in the same period, as required by Statement of Financial Standards (SFAS) 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. However, during the fourth quarter of 2003, the Mortgage Team discontinued the practice of using derivative instruments to hedge the open mortgage pipeline. Therefore, as of December 31, 2003, there were no outstanding derivatives in use for managing interest rate risk in the pipeline. The Mortgage Team instituted a new practice of locking mortgage loan applicants using a method known as best efforts. The method of selling best efforts involves the sale of mortgage loans to third party investors at a committed loan rate and loan amount within a predetermined time period without risk of a penalty for failure to deliver the locked mortgage loans. The benefit to Columbia is that it shifts the interest rate risk to the investor and eliminates the need to use derivatives for managing interest rate risk, but it does have the effect of lowering the amount of service release mortgage premium income. Management determined it is in Columbias best interests to accept the lower income for a reduction in interest rate risk exposure. This strategy will be evaluated on a periodic basis and may change as information becomes available and or personnel are hired with specialized skills to effectively manage the interest rate risk exposure from secondary marketing activity.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In June 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity. This statement establishes standards regarding classification and measurement of certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires financial instruments within the scope of this statement to be classified as liabilities (or an asset in some circumstances). Many of these financial instruments were previously classified as equity. This statement is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and was otherwise effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. For financial instruments created before the issuance date of this statement and still existing at the beginning of the interim period of adoption, transition is achieved by reporting the cumulative effect of a change in an accounting principle by initially measuring the financial instruments at fair value. Columbias management does not expect that the application of the provisions of this statement will have a material impact on Columbias consolidated financial statements.
34
In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. This statement amends and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and for hedging activities under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. Columbias management does not expect that the application of the provisions of this statement will have a material impact on Columbias consolidated financial statements.
In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. This interpretation clarifies the application of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, and requires existing unconsolidated variable interest entities to be consolidated by their primary beneficiaries if the entities do not effectively disperse risks among parties involved. This interpretation explains how to identify variable interest entities and how an enterprise assesses its interests in a variable interest entity to decide whether to consolidate that entity. In December 2003, FASB made revisions and delayed implementation of certain provisions of FIN 46. As a public entity that is not a Small Business Issuer, Columbia is now required to apply FIN 46 to all unconsolidated variable interest entities no later than March 31, 2004, with the exception of unconsolidated special-purpose entities, which had an implementation deadline of December 31, 2003. Special-purpose entities for this provision are expected to include entities whose activities are primarily related to securitizations or other forms of asset-backed financings or single-lessee leasing arrangements. Columbias management does not expect that the application of the provisions of this interpretation will have a material impact on Columbias consolidated financial statements.
Factors That May Affect Future Results of Operations
Our past experience may not be indicative of future performance, and as noted elsewhere in this report, management has included forward-looking statements about our business, plans and prospects that are subject to change. In addition to the other risks or uncertainties contained in this report, the following risks may affect our operating results, financial condition and cash flows. If any of these risks occur, either alone or in combination with other factors, our business, financial condition or operating results could be adversely affected. Moreover, readers should note that this is not an exhaustive list of the risks we face; some risks are unknown or not quantifiable, and other risks that we currently perceive as immaterial may ultimately prove more significant than we expect. You should therefore not construe our statements about plans, predictions or expectations to be assurances of performance or promises to take a given course of action.
Adequacy of Loan Loss Allowance. We have established a reserve for probable losses management expects in connection with loans in our credit portfolio. This allowance reflects managements estimates of the collectibility of certain identified loans, as well as an overall risk assessment of our total loans outstanding. Managements determination of the amount of our loan loss allowance is highly subjective; although management personnel apply criteria such as risk ratings and historical loss rates, these factors may not be adequate predictors of future loan performance. Accordingly, we cannot offer assurances that managements estimates ultimately will prove correct or that the loan loss allowance will be sufficient to protect against losses that ultimately may occur. If our loan loss allowance proves to be inadequate, we may suffer unexpected charges to income, which would adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition. Moreover, bank regulators frequently monitor banks loan loss allowances, and if regulators were to determine that our allowance is inadequate, they may require us to increase the allowance, which also would adversely impact our revenues and financial condition.
Valuation of the Mortgage Servicing Asset. We include on our balance sheet an asset that is largely influenced by the net present value of expected net servicing income, which is generated from mortgages originated and sold in the secondary market. This valuation reflects certain assumptions about net service fee income, servicing costs, prospective interest rates, real estate markets, rates of debt retirement, and other factors relating to the length of time during which those revenues can be expected to continue. The estimates and assumptions used in valuing the mortgage servicing asset are determined by a qualified independent third party. The qualified independent third party measures the value of the mortgage service asset based on assumptions influenced by current market conditions and near term transactions, which are likely to cause the value of the mortgage servicing asset to fluctuate. Therefore, potential valuation adjustments, which are charged against or credited to current income, may have a material adverse impact on revenues for the periods in which adjustments occur.
35
Growth and Management. Our financial performance and profitability will depend on our ability to manage recent and possible future growth. Although management believes that it has substantially integrated the business and operations of past acquisitions, there can be no assurance that unforeseen issues relating to the acquisitions will not adversely affect us. In addition, any future acquisitions and continued growth may present operating and other problems that could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will be able to execute our growth strategy or maintain the level of profitability that we have experienced.
Changes in Market Interest Rates. Our earnings are impacted by changing interest rates. Changes in interest rates affect the demand for new loans, the credit profile of existing loans, the rates received on loans and securities, and rates paid on deposits and borrowings. The relationship between the rates received on loans and securities and the rates paid on deposits and borrowings is known as interest rate spread. Given our current volume and mix of interest-bearing liabilities and interest-earning assets, our interest rate spread could be expected to increase during times of rapidly rising interest rates and, conversely, to decline during times of falling interest rates. However, due to the fact that approximately one-third of Columbias loans are on rate floors it will take approximately an 120 basis point rise in market rates before the net interest spread will improve. Exposure to interest rate risk is managed by monitoring the re-pricing frequency of CRBs rate-sensitive assets and rate-sensitive liabilities over any given period. Although we believe our current level of interest rate sensitivity is reasonable, significant fluctuations in interest rates may have an adverse affect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Geographic Concentration. Substantially all of our business is derived from a nine-county area in central, north-central and northeastern Oregon and south-central Washington. These areas are not extensively populated, and rely primarily upon the agricultural, electrical power generation and transportation markets for their economic success. While management has planned Columbias expansion strategy in part as a means to diversify the geographic concentration of our business, our business is and will remain sensitive to economic factors that relate to these industries and local and regional business conditions. As a result, local or regional economic downturns, or downturns that disproportionately affect one or more of our regions key industries, may have a more pronounced effect upon our business than they might on an institution that is a less geographically concentrated. The extent of the future impact of these events on economic and business conditions cannot be predicted; however, prolonged or acute fluctuations could have a material and adverse impact upon our results of operation and financial condition.
Regulation. We are subject to government regulation that could limit or restrict our activities, which in turn could adversely impact our operations. The financial services industry is regulated extensively. Federal and state regulation is designed primarily to protect the deposit insurance funds and consumers, and not to benefit our shareholders. These regulations can sometimes impose significant limitations on our operations. In addition, these regulations are constantly evolving and may change significantly over time. Significant new laws or changes in existing laws or repeal of existing laws may cause our results to differ materially. Further, federal monetary policy, particularly as implemented through the Federal Reserve System, can significantly affect credit conditions for us.
Competition. Competition may adversely affect our performance. The financial services business in our market areas is highly competitive. It is becoming increasingly competitive due to changes in regulation, technological advances, and the accelerating pace of consolidation among financial services providers. We face competition both in attracting deposits and in making loans. We compete for loans principally through the interest rates and loan fees we charge and the efficiency and quality of services we provide. Increasing levels of competition in the banking and financial services industries may reduce our market share or cause the prices we charge for our services to fall. Our results may differ in future periods depending upon the nature or level of competition.
Credit Risk. A source of risk arises from the possibility that losses will be sustained if a significant number of our borrowers, guarantors and related parties fail to perform in accordance with the terms of their loans. We have adopted underwriting and credit monitoring procedures and credit policies, including the establishment and review of the allowance for credit losses, that management believes are appropriate to minimize this risk by assessing the likelihood of nonperformance, tracking loan performance and diversifying our credit portfolio. These policies and procedures, however, may not prevent unexpected losses that could materially affect our results of operations.
36
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Risk Management
In the banking industry, a major risk involves changing interest rates, which can have a significant impact on Columbias profitability. Columbia manages its exposure to changes in interest rates through asset and liability management activities within the guidelines established by its Asset Liability Committee (ALCO). ALCO has the responsibility for approving and ensuring compliance with asset-liability management policies, including interest rate risk exposure, capital position, liquidity management and the investment portfolio. Reports prepared by ALCO are provided to the Board of Directors on a regular basis.
Asset-liability management simulation models are used to measure interest rate risk. The models quantify interest rate risk through simulating forecasted net interest income and economic value of equity over a 12-month time horizon under various rate scenarios. The economic value of equity is defined as the difference between the market value of current assets less the market value liabilities. By measuring the change in the present value of equity under different rate scenarios, management is able to identify interest rate risk that may not be evident in simulating changes in the forecasted net interest income.
Table 21 below shows the simulated percentage change in forecasted net interest income and the economic value of equity based on changes in the interest rate environment. The change in interest rates assumes an immediate, parallel and sustained shift in the base interest rate forecast. Through these simulations, management estimates the impact on net interest income and present value of equity based on a 100 and 200 basis point upward and downward gradual change of market interest rates over a one-year period. The analysis did not allow rates to fall below zero.
Table 22
Percent Change | Percent Change | |||||||
in Net Interest | in Present Value | |||||||
Change in Interest Rates | Income | of Equity | ||||||
-200 Basis points |
-1.85 | % | 0.87 | % | ||||
-100 Basis points |
-0.03 | % | -0.07 | % | ||||
+100 Basis points |
1.99 | % | 1.19 | % | ||||
+200 Basis points |
6.26 | % | 3.76 | % |
As illustrated in the above table, our balance sheet is currently asset sensitive, meaning that interest-earning assets mature or reprice more quickly than interest-bearing liabilities in a given period. Therefore, according to the model, net interest income should increase slightly when rates increase and shrink somewhat when rates fall. This is primarily a result of the concentration of variable rate and short-term commercial loans in Columbias portfolio.
The simulation model does not take into account future management actions that could be undertaken, should a change occur in actual market interest rates. Also, certain assumptions underlie modeling simulation results and these assumptions may have significant impact on the results. These include assumptions regarding the level of interest rates and balance changes of deposit products that do not have stated maturities. These assumptions have been developed through a combination of industry standards and expected pricing behavior in the future. The model also includes assumptions about changes in the composition or mix of the balance sheet. The results derived from the simulation model could vary significantly due to external factors such as changes in prepayment assumptions, early withdrawals of deposits and unforeseen competitive factors.
Mortgage Servicing Asset
The Mortgage Team has recorded a mortgage-servicing asset (MSA) that contains risk due to loan prepayments. The value of the MSA will likely decline when interest rates fall due to an increase in loan prepayments. The MSA is measured on a quarterly basis by a qualified independent entity with access and knowledge of current servicing transaction values between willing parties. The techniques used in valuing the MSA incorporate assumptions relative to prevailing conditions in the secondary servicing market. The assumptions used for valuing the MSA are gathered from near term transactions and include prepayment speed forecasts, market discount rates, earning rates, servicing costs, acquisition
37
costs and ancillary income. A decrease in the value of the MSA is recorded as a valuation write-down adjustment. However, actual fair values may differ from the measured valuation due to limitations in available third-party market quotations and assumptions.
The value of the mortgage servicing asset is interest rate sensitive and may require quarterly valuation adjustments during 2004 if mortgage interest rates decline further from levels experienced during 2003. However, if mortgage rates were to increase in 2004, management would expect the mortgage servicing asset value to stabilize and may in some instances be increased. In this instance, the monthly mortgage servicing asset amortization expense would be adjusted to meet the expected remaining life of the outstanding net servicing income.
38
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Selected Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)
The following tables set forth Columbias unaudited consolidated financial data regarding operations for each quarter of 2003 and 2002. This information, in the opinion of management, includes all normal and recurring adjustments, to fairly state the information contained in the tables. Certain amounts previously reported have been classified to conform with current presentation. These reclassifications had no net impact on the results of operations.
Table 23
2003 Quarterly Financial Data | ||||||||||||||||||||||
First | Second | Third | Fourth | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands except per share data) | Quarter | Quarter | Quarter | Quarter | Total | |||||||||||||||||
Income Statement Data |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 9,396 | $ | 9,583 | $ | 9,737 | $ | 9,514 | $ | 38,230 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
1,770 | 1,776 | 1,703 | 1,582 | 6,831 | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
7,626 | 7,807 | 8,034 | 7,932 | 31,399 | |||||||||||||||||
Loan loss provision |
300 | 1,700 | 400 | 175 | 2,575 | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest income after
Loan loss provision |
7,326 | 6,107 | 7,634 | 7,757 | 28,824 | |||||||||||||||||
Noninterest income |
2,000 | 1,971 | 2,843 | 2,110 | 8,924 | |||||||||||||||||
Noninterest expense |
5,588 | 5,758 | 5,651 | 5,353 | 22,350 | |||||||||||||||||
Income before provision for
income taxes |
3,738 | 2,320 | 4,826 | 4,514 | 15,398 | |||||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
1,348 | 849 | 1,767 | 1,600 | 5,564 | |||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 2,390 | $ | 1,471 | $ | 3,059 | $ | 2,914 | $ | 9,834 | ||||||||||||
Earnings Per Share |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per common share (1) |
$ | 0.27 | $ | 0.17 | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.33 | $ | 1.13 | ||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per common share (1) |
$ | 0.26 | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.34 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 1.09 |
2002 Quarterly Financial Data | ||||||||||||||||||||||
First | Second | Third | Fourth | |||||||||||||||||||
Quarter | Quarter | Quarter | Quarter | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Income Statement Data |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 8,587 | $ | 9,439 | $ | 9,841 | $ | 9,749 | $ | 37,616 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
1,790 | 2,029 | 2,090 | 1,873 | 7,782 | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
6,797 | 7,410 | 7,751 | 7,876 | 29,834 | |||||||||||||||||
Loan loss provision |
400 | 700 | 600 | 100 | 1,800 | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest income after
Loan loss provision |
6,397 | 6,710 | 7,151 | 7,776 | 28,034 | |||||||||||||||||
Noninterest income |
2,094 | 2,760 | 2,236 | 1,461 | 8,551 | |||||||||||||||||
Noninterest expense |
5,091 | 5,695 | 5,525 | 5,669 | 21,980 | |||||||||||||||||
Income before provision for
income taxes |
3,400 | 3,775 | 3,862 | 3,568 | 14,605 | |||||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
1,219 | 1,353 | 1,338 | 1,314 | 5,224 | |||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 2,181 | $ | 2,422 | $ | 2,524 | $ | 2,254 | $ | 9,381 | ||||||||||||
Earnings Per Share |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per common share (1) |
$ | 0.25 | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.28 | $ | 0.25 | $ | 1.05 | ||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per common share (1) |
$ | 0.24 | $ | 0.26 | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.25 | $ | 1.03 |
(1) Prior periods have been adjusted to reflect the 10% stock dividend, effective May 1, 2003.
Additional information called for by this item is contained in Columbia Bancorps Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2003, and is incorporated herein by reference.
39
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
Columbia Bancorp and Subsidiaries
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Columbia Bancorp and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, changes in shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of Columbia Bancorps management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Columbia Bancorp and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Portland, Oregon
January 9, 2004
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
December 31, | ||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
||||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 33,809,732 | $ | 28,414,139 | ||||||
Interest-bearing deposits with banks |
5,100,513 | 8,551,980 | ||||||||
Federal funds sold |
14,955,948 | 3,735,416 | ||||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents |
53,866,193 | 40,701,535 | ||||||||
INVESTMENT SECURITIES |
||||||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale |
13,875,646 | 14,749,694 | ||||||||
Investment securities held-to-maturity |
14,963,728 | 18,600,335 | ||||||||
Restricted equity securities |
2,843,100 | 2,698,200 | ||||||||
Total investment securities |
31,682,474 | 36,048,229 | ||||||||
LOANS |
||||||||||
Loans held-for-sale |
2,792,384 | 8,769,777 | ||||||||
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses
and unearned loan fees |
461,557,765 | 423,917,555 | ||||||||
Total loans |
464,350,149 | 432,687,332 | ||||||||
OTHER ASSETS |
||||||||||
Property and equipment, net of accumulated
depreciation |
13,766,909 | 14,183,851 | ||||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
3,769,527 | 3,895,237 | ||||||||
Goodwill |
7,389,094 | 7,389,094 | ||||||||
Mortgage servicing asset, net of accumulated
amortization and valuation allowance |
3,691,449 | 4,614,391 | ||||||||
Other assets |
5,619,839 | 4,806,315 | ||||||||
Total other assets |
34,236,818 | 34,888,888 | ||||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 584,135,634 | $ | 544,325,984 | ||||||
41
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
December 31, | ||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||||
DEPOSITS |
||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits |
$ | 150,425,062 | $ | 131,830,974 | ||||||
Interest-bearing demand deposits |
187,452,543 | 182,340,665 | ||||||||
Savings accounts |
35,732,611 | 32,939,990 | ||||||||
Time certificates |
122,747,824 | 111,512,375 | ||||||||
Total deposits |
496,358,040 | 458,624,004 | ||||||||
OTHER LIABILITIES |
||||||||||
Notes payable |
21,983,465 | 27,134,946 | ||||||||
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities |
3,989,665 | 4,376,653 | ||||||||
Guaranteed undivided beneficial interest in
Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest
Debentures (Trust Preferred Securities)
at fair value |
4,000,000 | 4,000,000 | ||||||||
Total other liabilities |
29,973,130 | 35,511,599 | ||||||||
Total liabilities |
526,331,170 | 494,135,603 | ||||||||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 19) |
||||||||||
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||||
Common stock, no par value, 20,000,000 shares
authorized; 8,750,582 and 8,648,618 shares
issued and outstanding at December 31, 2003
and 2002, respectively |
31,520,099 | 17,841,700 | ||||||||
Retained earnings |
26,252,366 | 32,174,431 | ||||||||
Accumulated comprehensive income, net of taxes |
31,999 | 174,250 | ||||||||
Total shareholders equity |
57,804,464 | 50,190,381 | ||||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY |
$ | 584,135,634 | $ | 544,325,984 | ||||||
See accompanying notes.
42
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||||
INTEREST INCOME |
|||||||||||||||
Interest and fees on loans |
$ | 36,496,259 | $ | 35,334,245 | $ | 32,134,970 | |||||||||
Interest on investments: |
|||||||||||||||
Taxable investment securities |
514,195 | 1,035,059 | 1,614,918 | ||||||||||||
Nontaxable investment securities |
729,022 | 807,504 | 871,172 | ||||||||||||
Interest on federal funds sold |
205,367 | 99,071 | 40,038 | ||||||||||||
Other interest and dividend income |
285,276 | 340,172 | 417,221 | ||||||||||||
Total interest income |
38,230,119 | 37,616,051 | 35,078,319 | ||||||||||||
INTEREST EXPENSE |
|||||||||||||||
Interest on interest-bearing demand deposit
and savings accounts |
1,596,639 | 1,732,050 | 3,317,933 | ||||||||||||
Interest on time certificates |
4,023,348 | 4,695,641 | 6,385,589 | ||||||||||||
Other borrowed funds |
1,210,653 | 1,354,438 | 1,879,647 | ||||||||||||
Total interest expense |
6,830,640 | 7,782,129 | 11,583,169 | ||||||||||||
NET INTEREST INCOME BEFORE PROVISION
FOR LOAN LOSSES |
31,399,479 | 29,833,922 | 23,495,150 | ||||||||||||
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES |
2,575,000 | 1,800,000 | 1,450,000 | ||||||||||||
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION
FOR LOAN LOSSES |
28,824,479 | 28,033,922 | 22,045,150 | ||||||||||||
NONINTEREST INCOME |
|||||||||||||||
Service charges and fees |
4,307,634 | 4,089,240 | 3,013,734 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage Team net revenues |
2,431,672 | 2,193,314 | 4,263,441 | ||||||||||||
Credit card discounts and fees |
436,953 | 419,762 | 357,729 | ||||||||||||
CRB Financial Services Team revenues |
579,388 | 559,968 | 467,791 | ||||||||||||
Net gain on sale or call of investment securities |
462,249 | 295,822 | 27,530 | ||||||||||||
Other noninterest income |
705,881 | 993,041 | 1,063,602 | ||||||||||||
Total noninterest income |
8,923,777 | 8,551,147 | 9,193,827 | ||||||||||||
43
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||||||
NONINTEREST EXPENSE |
||||||||||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits |
$ | 13,055,840 | $ | 13,059,535 | $ | 11,421,966 | ||||||||||
Occupancy expense |
2,247,309 | 2,058,065 | 1,830,346 | |||||||||||||
Item and statement processing |
777,594 | 760,156 | 676,890 | |||||||||||||
Goodwill amortization |
| | 628,623 | |||||||||||||
Data processing expense |
352,743 | 370,889 | 301,878 | |||||||||||||
Other noninterest expense |
5,916,665 | 5,731,822 | 4,628,745 | |||||||||||||
Total noninterest expense |
22,350,151 | 21,980,467 | 19,488,448 | |||||||||||||
INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR
INCOME TAXES |
15,398,105 | 14,604,602 | 11,750,529 | |||||||||||||
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES |
5,564,309 | 5,223,497 | 4,376,812 | |||||||||||||
NET INCOME |
9,833,796 | 9,381,105 | 7,373,717 | |||||||||||||
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) |
||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Unrealized holding gains arising during the
period |
173,809 | 30,473 | 440,769 | |||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for gains
included in net income |
(295,839 | ) | (194,011 | ) | (18,064 | ) | ||||||||||
Reduction in fair value of interest-rate swap |
(20,221 | ) | | | ||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss),
net of taxes |
(142,251 | ) | (163,538 | ) | 422,705 | |||||||||||
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
$ | 9,691,545 | $ | 9,217,567 | $ | 7,796,422 | ||||||||||
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE OF COMMON
STOCK |
$ | 1.13 | $ | 1.05 | $ | 0.83 | ||||||||||
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE OF
COMMON STOCK |
$ | 1.09 | $ | 1.03 | $ | 0.81 | ||||||||||
See accompanying notes.
44
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Comprehensive | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Retained | Income | Stockholders | |||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Earnings | (Loss) | Equity | |||||||||||||||||
BALANCE, December 31, 2000 |
8,029,422 | $ | 20,841,164 | $ | 20,569,918 | $ | (84,917 | ) | $ | 41,326,165 | |||||||||||
Stock options exercised |
57,656 | 307,455 | | | 307,455 | ||||||||||||||||
Income tax benefit from stock options
exercised |
| 12,478 | | | 12,478 | ||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock |
(50,000 | ) | (427,503 | ) | | | (427,503 | ) | |||||||||||||
Cash dividends paid |
| | (1,927,227 | ) | | (1,927,227 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared |
| | (642,858 | ) | | (642,858 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net income and comprehensive income |
| | 7,373,717 | 422,705 | 7,796,422 | ||||||||||||||||
BALANCE, December 31, 2001 |
8,037,078 | 20,733,594 | 25,373,550 | 337,788 | 46,444,932 | ||||||||||||||||
Stock options exercised |
153,724 | 1,008,572 | | | 1,008,572 | ||||||||||||||||
Income tax benefit from stock options
exercised |
| 122,704 | | | 122,704 | ||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock |
(328,422 | ) | (4,023,170 | ) | | | (4,023,170 | ) | |||||||||||||
Cash dividends paid |
| | (1,951,234 | ) | | (1,951,234 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared |
| | (628,990 | ) | | (628,990 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net income and comprehensive income |
| | 9,381,105 | (163,538 | ) | 9,217,567 | |||||||||||||||
BALANCE, December 31, 2002 |
7,862,380 | 17,841,700 | 32,174,431 | 174,250 | 50,190,381 | ||||||||||||||||
Stock options exercised |
113,015 | 782,637 | | | 782,637 | ||||||||||||||||
Income tax benefit from stock options
exercised |
| 212,242 | | | 212,242 | ||||||||||||||||
10% stock dividend and cash paid for
fractional shares |
791,887 | 12,931,515 | (12,937,194 | ) | | (5,679 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock |
(16,700 | ) | (247,995 | ) | | | (247,995 | ) | |||||||||||||
Cash dividends paid |
| | (2,031,115 | ) | | (2,031,115 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared |
| | (787,552 | ) | | (787,552 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net income and comprehensive income |
| | 9,833,796 | (142,251 | ) | 9,691,545 | |||||||||||||||
BALANCE, December 31, 2003 |
8,750,582 | $ | 31,520,099 | $ | 26,252,366 | $ | 31,999 | $ | 57,804,464 | ||||||||||||
See accompanying notes.
45
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 9,833,796 | $ | 9,381,105 | $ | 7,373,717 | ||||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from
operating activities: |
||||||||||||||||
Amortization of premiums and discounts on investment
securities |
16,113 | 65,407 | 36,135 | |||||||||||||
Net gain on sale or call of investment securities |
(462,249 | ) | (295,822 | ) | (27,530 | ) | ||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank stock dividend |
(144,900 | ) | (157,700 | ) | (123,200 | ) | ||||||||||
Loss on sale or write-down of property, equipment,
and other real estate owned |
118,196 | 55,395 | 776 | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization: |
||||||||||||||||
Property, equipment, and other |
1,351,158 | 1,238,839 | 1,767,999 | |||||||||||||
Mortgage servicing asset |
2,000,050 | 1,028,810 | 395,354 | |||||||||||||
Impairment of mortgage servicing asset |
858,000 | 2,781,111 | 917,729 | |||||||||||||
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense |
(828,758 | ) | (692,556 | ) | 1,262,560 | |||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
2,575,000 | 1,800,000 | 1,450,000 | |||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash due to changes in certain
assets and liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from the sale of mortgage loans held-for-sale |
236,753,057 | 239,365,825 | 318,259,993 | |||||||||||||
Production of mortgage loans held-for-sale |
(230,775,664 | ) | (229,175,623 | ) | (331,901,669 | ) | ||||||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
125,710 | (409,704 | ) | 506,507 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage servicing asset |
(1,935,108 | ) | (2,227,511 | ) | (4,750,197 | ) | ||||||||||
Other assets |
(781,711 | ) | (326,919 | ) | (1,919,090 | ) | ||||||||||
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities |
537,802 | 2,865,950 | 2,335,012 | |||||||||||||
Net cash from operating activities |
19,240,492 | 25,296,607 | (4,415,904 | ) | ||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from the sale of available-for-sale securities |
5,670,252 | 300,000 | 18,315,428 | |||||||||||||
Proceeds from the maturity of available-for-sale securities |
19,030,000 | 7,300,000 | 2,895,000 | |||||||||||||
Purchases of available-for-sale securities |
(23,533,877 | ) | (4,000,000 | ) | | |||||||||||
Proceeds from the maturity or call of held-to-maturity
securities |
4,954,467 | 4,077,273 | 2,330,603 | |||||||||||||
Purchases of held-to-maturity securities |
(1,347,865 | ) | (81,579 | ) | (5,484,218 | ) | ||||||||||
Purchase of restricted equity securities |
| (468,200 | ) | (311,500 | ) | |||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of restricted equity securities |
| 487,013 | | |||||||||||||
Net change in loans made to customers |
(40,319,910 | ) | (64,947,534 | ) | (68,850,433 | ) | ||||||||||
Investment in low-income housing tax credits |
| (10,000 | ) | | ||||||||||||
Investment in bank-owned life insurance |
| | (3,174,000 | ) | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment |
| 25,269 | | |||||||||||||
Proceeds from the sale of other real estate owned |
63,174 | 876,690 | 290,187 | |||||||||||||
Payments made for purchase of property and equipment |
(1,042,699 | ) | (1,589,572 | ) | (1,151,825 | ) | ||||||||||
Net cash from investing activities |
(36,526,458 | ) | (58,030,640 | ) | (55,140,758 | ) | ||||||||||
46
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||||||||
Net change in demand deposit and savings accounts |
$ | 26,498,587 | $ | 66,596,197 | $ | 29,183,436 | ||||||||
Net change in time certificates |
11,235,449 | (5,396,585 | ) | 19,024,644 | ||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in notes payable |
(5,151,481 | ) | (8,769,596 | ) | 9,535,318 | |||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of subordinated debentures |
| 4,000,000 | | |||||||||||
Dividends paid and cash paid for fractional shares |
(2,666,573 | ) | (2,593,588 | ) | (2,569,581 | ) | ||||||||
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options |
782,637 | 1,008,572 | 307,455 | |||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock |
(247,995 | ) | (4,023,170 | ) | (427,503 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash from financing activities |
30,450,624 | 50,821,830 | 55,053,769 | |||||||||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS |
13,164,658 | 18,087,797 | (4,502,893 | ) | ||||||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year |
40,701,535 | 22,613,738 | 27,116,631 | |||||||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of year |
$ | 53,866,193 | $ | 40,701,535 | $ | 22,613,738 | ||||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
||||||||||||||
Interest paid in cash |
$ | 6,728,204 | $ | 7,784,590 | $ | 11,705,699 | ||||||||
Taxes paid in cash |
$ | 6,027,000 | $ | 5,919,000 | $ | 2,906,000 | ||||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gain or loss on available-for-sale
securities, net of taxes |
$ | (122,030 | ) | $ | (163,538 | ) | $ | 422,705 | ||||||
Change in fair value of interest-rate swap |
$ | (20,221 | ) | $ | | $ | | |||||||
Cash dividend declared and payable after year-end |
$ | 787,552 | $ | 628,990 | $ | 642,858 | ||||||||
Transfers of loans to other real estate owned |
$ | 104,700 | $ | 553,100 | $ | 640,176 | ||||||||
47
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Organization and nature of operations - Columbia Bancorp (Columbia) was incorporated on October 3, 1995, and became the holding company of Columbia River Bank (the Bank) effective January 1, 1996. The Bank is a state-chartered financial institution authorized to provide banking services in the states of Oregon and Washington. With its administrative headquarters in The Dalles, Oregon, the Bank operates 18 branch facilities, 15 in Wasco, Hood River, Deschutes, Clackamas, Jefferson, Umatilla, and Yamhill counties in Oregon, and three branches in Benton and Klickitat counties in Washington. The Bank operates a mortgage banking division, the Mortgage Team, which provides services to all banking branches of the Bank. In December 2002, Columbia formed Columbia Bancorp Trust I, a wholly-owned Delaware statutory business trust, for purposes of issuing guaranteed undivided beneficial interests in junior subordinated debentures (Trust Preferred Securities). During December 2002, the Trust issued $4 million in Trust Preferred Securities. Substantially all activity of Columbia is conducted through its subsidiary bank. The Bank, along with Columbia, is subject to the regulations of certain federal and state agencies and undergoes periodic examinations by those regulatory authorities.
All significant intercompany accounts and transactions between Columbia and its subsidiaries have been eliminated in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.
Managements estimates and assumptions - Preparation of the consolidated financial statements, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet, and revenues and expenses for the period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. Significant estimations made by management primarily involve the calculation of the allowance for loan losses and the valuation of the mortgage servicing asset.
Cash and cash equivalents - Cash and cash equivalents normally include cash on hand, amounts due from banks, and federal funds sold. Cash and due from banks include amounts the Bank is required to maintain to meet certain average reserve and compensating balance requirements of the Federal Reserve. As of December 31, 2003 and 2002, the Bank had no reserve requirement to be maintained at the Federal Reserve; however, total clearing balance requirements at December 31, 2003 and 2002, were $400,000.
Investment securities - Columbia is required to specifically identify its investment securities as held-to-maturity, available-for-sale, or trading accounts. Accordingly, management has determined that all investment securities held at December 31, 2003 and 2002, are either held-to-maturity or available-for-sale and conform to the following accounting policies:
Securities held-to-maturity - Bonds, notes, and debentures for which Columbia has the intent and ability to hold to maturity are reported at cost, adjusted for premiums and discounts that are recognized in interest income, using the interest method over the period to maturity.
48
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - (continued)
Securities available-for-sale - Available-for-sale securities consist of bonds, notes, debentures, and certain equity securities not classified as held-to-maturity securities. Securities are generally classified as available-for-sale if the instrument may be sold in response to such factors as (1) changes in market interest rates and related changes in the prepayment risk, (2) needs for liquidity, (3) changes in the availability of and the yield on alternative instruments, and (4) changes in funding sources and terms. Unrealized holding gains and losses, net of tax, on available-for-sale securities are reported as other comprehensive income and carried as accumulated comprehensive income or loss within shareholders equity until realized. Fair values for these investment securities are based on quoted market prices. Gains and losses on the sale of available-for-sale securities are determined using the specific-identification method.
Declines in the fair value of individual held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities below their cost that are other than temporary result in write-downs of the individual securities to their fair value. The related write-downs are included in earnings as realized losses. Premiums and discounts are recognized in interest income using the effective interest method over the period to maturity.
Restricted equity securities - Columbias equity investments in the Federal Home Loan Bank and the Federal Agriculture Mortgage Corporation are classified as restricted equity securities since ownership of these instruments is restricted and they do not have an active market. These investments are carried at cost.
Loans held-for-sale - Mortgage loans held-for-sale are carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair market value. Fair market value is determined on an aggregate loan basis. At December 31, 2003 and 2002, mortgage loans held-for-sale were carried at cost which approximated fair market value.
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses and unearned loan fees - Loans are stated at the amount of unpaid principal, reduced by an allowance for loan losses and unearned loan fees. Interest on loans is calculated using the simple-interest method on daily balances of the principal amount outstanding. Loan origination fees and certain direct origination costs are capitalized and recognized as an adjustment of the yield over the life of the related loan.
The Bank does not accrue interest on loans for which payment in full of principal and interest is not expected, or which payment of principal or interest has been in default 90 days or more, unless the loan is well-secured and in the process of collection. Nonaccrual loans are considered impaired loans. Each impaired loan is carried at the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate, the loans market price, or the fair value of collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. When interest accrual is discontinued, all unpaid accrued interest is reversed. Interest income is subsequently recognized only to the extent cash payments are received or when the loan is removed from nonaccrual status. Large groups of smaller balance, homogeneous loans may be collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, the Bank may not separately identify individual consumer and residential loans for evaluation of impairment.
49
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - (continued)
The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense. Loans are charged against the allowance for loan losses when management believes that the collectibility of the principal is unlikely. The allowance is an amount that management believes will be adequate to absorb possible losses on existing loans that may become uncollectible, based on evaluations of the collectibility of loans and prior loan loss experience. The evaluations take into consideration such factors as changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality, review of specific problem loans, and current economic conditions that may affect the borrowers ability to pay. Various regulatory agencies, as a regular part of their examination process, periodically review the Banks allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require the Bank to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgment of information available to them at the time of the examinations.
Property and equipment - Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed by the straight-line and accelerated methods over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from 3 to 7 years for furniture and equipment, and 31-1/2 years for building premises.
Goodwill - Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of net assets acquired from the purchase of Valley Community Bancorp in 1998, and was amortized by the straight-line method over a 15-year period until December 31, 2001. Under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, the Bank ceased amortization of goodwill effective January 1, 2002, completed its initial assessment of goodwill impairment in March 2002, and has completed the annual assessment each December thereafter. Goodwill impairment is deemed to exist if the net book value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value. Columbias reporting units are generally consistent with the operating segments identified in Note 23 Segment Information. Neither the initial or annual assessments have identified impairment of goodwill such that the net book value of the reporting unit exceeded its estimated fair value.
The following summarizes the effects of adoption of SFAS No. 142 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001 (in thousands, except per share data):
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
Reported net income |
$ | 9,834 | $ | 9,381 | $ | 7,374 | |||||||
Add back goodwill amortization |
| | 629 | ||||||||||
Adjusted net income |
$ | 9,834 | $ | 9,381 | $ | 8,003 | |||||||
Basic earnings per share: |
|||||||||||||
Reported |
$ | 1.13 | $ | 1.05 | $ | 0.83 | |||||||
Adjusted |
$ | 1.13 | $ | 1.05 | $ | 0.91 | |||||||
Diluted earnings per share: |
|||||||||||||
Reported |
$ | 1.09 | $ | 1.03 | $ | 0.81 | |||||||
Adjusted |
$ | 1.09 | $ | 1.03 | $ | 0.88 |
50
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - (continued)
Mortgage servicing asset, net of amortization and valuation allowance - Mortgage servicing rights retained are measured by allocating the carrying value of the loans between the assets sold and the interest retained, based on the relative fair value at the date of sale. Mortgage servicing rights retained are capitalized and included with the mortgage servicing asset (MSA) at their allocated carrying value and amortized in proportion to, and over the period of, estimated future net servicing revenues. Impairment of the mortgage servicing asset is assessed based on the fair value of those rights. Fair values are estimated using discounted cash flows of servicing revenues less servicing costs based on current market interest rates, inflation rates, and industry prepayment rates in accordance with SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. The amount of a valuation allowance recognized is the amount by which the capitalized mortgage servicing asset exceeds the calculated fair value.
Investment in a limited partnership - Columbia has a 10% interest in a limited partnership that owns and operates affordable housing projects. Investment in these projects serves as an element of Columbias compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act, and Columbia receives tax benefits in the form of deductions for operating losses and tax credits. The tax credits may be used to reduce taxes currently payable or may be carried back one year or forward 20 years to recapture or reduce taxes. Columbia uses the equity method in accounting for its interest in the partnerships operating results; tax credits are recorded in the years they become available to reduce income taxes.
Other real estate owned - Other real estate, acquired through foreclosure or deeds in lieu of foreclosure, is carried at the lower of cost or estimated net realizable value. When property is acquired, any excess of the loan balance over its estimated net realizable value is charged to the allowance for loan losses. Subsequent write-downs to net realizable value, if any, or any disposition gains or losses are included in noninterest income and expense. At December 31, 2003, the Bank held $41,500 in other real estate owned. The Bank held no other real estate owned as of December 31, 2002.
Income taxes - Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the tax effects of the differences between the book and tax bases of the various balance sheet assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are reflected at currently enacted income tax rates applicable to the period in which the deferred tax assets or liabilities are expected to be realized or settled. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through the provision for income taxes.
Advertising - Advertising costs are charged to expense during the year in which they are incurred. Advertising expenses include promotional expenses such as public relations costs and donations, and were $536,871, $500,086, and $549,735 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively.
Earnings per share - Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, after giving retroactive effect to stock dividends and splits. Diluted earnings per share is computed similar to basic earnings per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued. Included in the denominator is the dilutive effect of stock options computed under the treasury stock method.
51
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - (continued)
Stock options - Columbia applies Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations in accounting for its stock option plan using the intrinsic value-based method. Accordingly, compensation costs are recognized as the difference between the exercise price of each option and the market price of Columbias stock at the date of each grant. Had compensation cost for Columbias 2003, 2002, and 2001 grants under its stock-based compensation plan been determined consistent with the fair value-based method defined in SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, its net income and earnings per common share for December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001, would approximate the pro forma amounts shown below (in thousands, except per share data).
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
Net income: |
|||||||||||||
As reported |
$ | 9,834 | $ | 9,381 | $ | 7,374 | |||||||
Pro forma |
$ | 9,657 | $ | 8,570 | $ | 6,823 | |||||||
Basic earnings per share: |
|||||||||||||
As reported |
$ | 1.13 | $ | 1.05 | $ | 0.83 | |||||||
Pro forma |
$ | 1.11 | $ | 0.96 | $ | 0.77 | |||||||
Diluted earnings per share: |
|||||||||||||
As reported |
$ | 1.09 | $ | 1.03 | $ | 0.81 | |||||||
Pro forma |
$ | 1.07 | $ | 0.94 | $ | 0.75 |
The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions for December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001:
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
Dividend yield |
2.14 | % | 2.14 | % | 3.00 | % | ||||||
Expected life (years) |
6.00 | 6.00 | 3.32 | |||||||||
Expected volatility |
43.71 | % | 45.25 | % | 29.77 | % | ||||||
Risk-free rate |
3.02 | % | 2.08 | % | 3.74 | % |
The effects of applying SFAS No. 123 in this pro forma disclosure are not indicative of future amounts.
Off-balance-sheet financial instruments - In the ordinary course of business, the Bank enters into off-balance-sheet financial instruments consisting of commitments to extend credit, commitments under credit card arrangements, commercial letters of credit, and standby letters of credit. These financial instruments are recorded in the consolidated financial statements when they are funded or related fees are incurred or received.
52
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - (continued)
Derivative financial instruments - Columbia has adopted SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivatives and Hedging Activities, and SFAS No. 138, Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities, an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. All derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, are recognized in the consolidated balance sheets at fair value. SFAS No. 133 requires that the accounting for gains or losses from changes in the derivative instruments fair value is contingent upon whether the derivative instrument qualifies as a hedge under the accounting standard. On the date Columbia enters into a derivative contract, Columbia designates the derivative instrument as (1) a hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or of an unrecognized firm commitment (fair value hedge), (2) a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (cash flow hedge), or (3) a hedge for trading, customer accommodation, or not qualifying for hedge accounting (free-standing derivative instruments). For a fair value hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument and changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability, or of an unrecognized firm commitment attributable to the hedged risk are recorded in current period net income. For a cash flow hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument to the extent that it is effective are recorded in other comprehensive income, net of tax, within shareholders equity and subsequently reclassified to net income in the same period(s) that the hedged transaction impacts net income. For free-standing derivative instruments, changes in the fair values are reported in current period net income. Columbia formally documents the relationship between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as the risk management objective and strategy for undertaking any hedge transaction. This process includes linking all derivative instruments that are designated as fair value or cash flow hedges to specific assets and liabilities on the balance sheet or to specific forecasted transactions. Columbia has historically used forward sales contract derivatives as a strategy to mitigate the risk associated with interest rate volatility and currently uses an interest-rate swap to mitigate the variability of interest payments on the Trust Preferred Securities. Columbia also formally assesses both at the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivative instruments used are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of hedged items.
Fair value of financial instruments - The following methods and assumptions were used by Columbia in estimating fair values of financial instruments as disclosed herein:
Held-to-maturity, available-for-sale, and restricted equity securities - Fair values for investment securities, excluding restricted equity securities, are based on quoted market prices. The carrying values of restricted equity securities approximate fair values.
Loans receivable - For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and have no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. Fair values for certain mortgage loans (for example, one-to-four family residential), credit card loans, and other consumer loans are based on quoted market prices of similar loans sold in conjunction with securitization transactions, adjusted for differences in loan characteristics. Fair values for commercial real estate and commercial loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. Fair values for impaired loans are estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis or underlying collateral values, where applicable.
53
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - (continued)
Deposit liabilities - The fair values disclosed for demand deposits are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (that is, their carrying amounts). The carrying amounts of variable-rate money market accounts and fixed-term certificates of deposit (CDs) approximate their fair values at the reporting date. Fair values for fixed-rate CDs are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.
Short-term borrowings - The carrying amounts of federal funds purchased, borrowings under repurchase agreements, and other short-term borrowings maturing within 90 days approximate their fair values. Fair values of other short-term borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the Banks current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.
Long-term debt - The fair value of the Banks long-term debt is estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on the Banks current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.
Off-balance-sheet instruments - The Banks off-balance-sheet instruments include unfunded commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. The fair value of these instruments is not considered practicable to estimate because of the lack of quoted market prices and the inability to estimate fair value without incurring excessive costs.
Recently issued accounting standards - In June 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity. This statement establishes standards regarding classification and measurement of certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires financial instruments within the scope of this statement to be classified as liabilities (or an asset in some circumstances). Many of these financial instruments were previously classified as equity. This statement is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and was otherwise effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. For financial instruments created before the issuance date of this statement and still existing at the beginning of the interim period of adoption, transition is achieved by reporting the cumulative effect of a change in an accounting principle by initially measuring the financial instruments at fair value. Columbias management does not expect that the application of the provisions of this statement will have a material impact on Columbias consolidated financial statements.
In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. This statement amends and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and for hedging activities under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. Columbias management does not expect that the application of the provisions of this statement will have a material impact on Columbias consolidated financial statements.
54
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - (continued)
In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. This interpretation clarifies the application of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, and requires existing unconsolidated variable interest entities to be consolidated by their primary beneficiaries if the entities do not effectively disperse risks among parties involved. This interpretation explains how to identify variable interest entities and how an enterprise assesses its interests in a variable interest entity to decide whether to consolidate that entity. In December 2003, FASB made revisions and delayed implementation of certain provisions of FIN 46. As a public entity that is not a Small Business Issuer, Columbia is now required to apply FIN 46 to all unconsolidated variable interest entities no later than March 31, 2004, with the exception of unconsolidated special-purpose entities, which had an implementation deadline of December 31, 2003. Special-purpose entities for this provision are expected to include entities whose activities are primarily related to securitizations or other forms of asset-backed financings or single-lessee leasing arrangements. Columbias management does not expect that the application of the provisions of this interpretation will have a material impact on Columbias consolidated financial statements.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2002 and 2001 consolidated financial statements to conform with current year presentations.
NOTE 2 - INVESTMENT SECURITIES
The amortized cost and estimated fair values of Columbias investment securities at December 31, 2003 and 2002, are summarized as follows:
Gross | Gross | Estimated | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | ||||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | ||||||||||||||
December 31, 2003: |
|||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale securities: |
|||||||||||||||||
Obligations
of U.S. government agencies |
$ | 12,980,989 | $ | 24,165 | $ | (1,250 | ) | $ | 13,003,904 | ||||||||
Corporate equity securities |
75,000 | 3,750 | | 78,750 | |||||||||||||
Municipal securities |
739,455 | 53,537 | | 792,992 | |||||||||||||
$ | 13,795,444 | $ | 81,452 | $ | (1,250 | ) | $ | 13,875,646 | |||||||||
Held-to-maturity securities: |
|||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities |
$ | 1,866,412 | $ | 62,116 | $ | | $ | 1,928,528 | |||||||||
Municipal securities |
13,016,058 | 818,153 | (539 | ) | 13,833,672 | ||||||||||||
Obligations
of U.S. government agencies |
81,258 | | | 81,258 | |||||||||||||
$ | 14,963,728 | $ | 880,269 | $ | (539 | ) | $ | 15,843,458 | |||||||||
55
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 2 - INVESTMENT SECURITIES - (continued)
Gross | Gross | Estimated | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | ||||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | ||||||||||||||
December 31, 2002: |
|||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale securities: |
|||||||||||||||||
Obligations
of U.S. government agencies |
$ | 11,499,888 | $ | 143,700 | $ | | $ | 11,643,588 | |||||||||
Corporate debt securities |
1,228,919 | 37,253 | | 1,266,172 | |||||||||||||
Corporate equity securities |
112,987 | | | 112,987 | |||||||||||||
Municipal securities |
1,643,884 | 83,063 | | 1,726,947 | |||||||||||||
$ | 14,485,678 | $ | 264,016 | $ | | $ | 14,749,694 | ||||||||||
Held-to-maturity securities: |
|||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities |
$ | 3,770,306 | $ | 149,815 | $ | | $ | 3,920,121 | |||||||||
Municipal securities |
14,748,450 | 689,734 | (536 | ) | 15,437,648 | ||||||||||||
Obligations
of U.S. government agencies |
81,579 | | | 81,579 | |||||||||||||
$ | 18,600,335 | $ | 839,549 | $ | (536 | ) | $ | 19,439,348 | |||||||||
The following table presents the gross unrealized losses and fair value of the Banks investment securities, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at December 31, 2003:
Less than 12 months | 12 months or more | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Losses | Fair Value | Losses | Fair Value | Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
Obligations
of U.S. government agencies |
$ | 1,998,750 | $ | (1,250 | ) | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,998,750 | $ | (1,250 | ) | ||||||||||
Municipal securities |
| | 65,098 | (539 | ) | 65,098 | (539 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
$ | 1,998,750 | $ | (1,250 | ) | $ | 65,098 | $ | (539 | ) | $ | 2,063,848 | $ | (1,789 | ) | ||||||||||
56
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 2 - INVESTMENT SECURITIES - (continued)
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investment securities at December 31, 2003, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
Available-For-Sale | Held-To-Maturity | |||||||||||||||
Estimated | Estimated | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Fair | Amortized | Fair | |||||||||||||
Cost | Value | Cost | Value | |||||||||||||
Due in one year or less |
$ | 7,107,096 | $ | 7,113,569 | $ | 2,160,255 | $ | 2,216,759 | ||||||||
Due after one year through
five years |
6,613,348 | 6,683,327 | 2,203,885 | 2,290,416 | ||||||||||||
Due after five years through
ten years |
| | 9,169,430 | 9,816,017 | ||||||||||||
Due after ten years |
| | 1,430,158 | 1,520,266 | ||||||||||||
13,720,444 | 13,796,896 | 14,963,728 | 15,843,458 | |||||||||||||
Corporate equity securities |
75,000 | 78,750 | | | ||||||||||||
$ | 13,795,444 | $ | 13,875,646 | $ | 14,963,728 | $ | 15,843,458 | |||||||||
For the purpose of the maturity table, mortgage-backed securities, which are not due at a single maturity date, have been allocated over maturity groupings based on the weighted-average contractual maturities of underlying collateral. Mortgage-backed securities may mature earlier than their weighted-average contractual maturities because of principal prepayments.
As of December 31, 2003 and 2002, investment securities with an amortized cost of $14,042,333 and $15,270,194, respectively, have been pledged to secure notes payable at the Federal Home Loan and Federal Reserve banks and public or other deposits, as required by law.
NOTE 3 - RESTRICTED EQUITY SECURITIES
The composition of restricted equity securities is as follows:
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
$ | 2,833,700 | $ | 2,688,800 | ||||
Federal Agriculture Mortgage Corporation stock |
9,400 | 9,400 | ||||||
$ | 2,843,100 | $ | 2,698,200 | |||||
57
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 4 - LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
The loan portfolio consists of the following:
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Commercial |
$ | 86,163,437 | $ | 69,881,954 | ||||
Agriculture |
64,058,572 | 61,770,202 | ||||||
Real estate |
206,754,240 | 181,456,664 | ||||||
Real estate construction |
87,426,996 | 91,035,925 | ||||||
Consumer |
18,241,447 | 20,936,603 | ||||||
Credit card and other loans |
6,975,262 | 6,497,855 | ||||||
469,619,954 | 431,579,203 | |||||||
Less allowance for loan losses |
(6,612,308 | ) | (6,416,691 | ) | ||||
Less unearned loan fees |
(1,449,881 | ) | (1,244,957 | ) | ||||
$ | 461,557,765 | $ | 423,917,555 | |||||
Impaired loans had a recorded investment of $3,292,632 and $742,049 at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The Banks average investment in impaired loans, measured on the basis of the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rates, was approximately $4,024,000 and $1,076,000 during 2003 and 2002, respectively. The total allowance for loan losses related to these loans at December 31, 2003 and 2002, was approximately $1,111,000 and $253,000, respectively. Had the impaired loans performed according to their original terms, additional interest income of $589,125, $215,663, and $209,415 would have been recognized in 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively. No interest income has been recognized on impaired loans during the period of impairment.
Changes in the allowance for loan losses were as follows:
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
BALANCE, beginning of year |
$ | 6,416,691 | $ | 5,311,715 | $ | 4,577,941 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses |
2,575,000 | 1,800,000 | 1,450,000 | |||||||||
Loans charged off |
(2,533,417 | ) | (886,156 | ) | (799,583 | ) | ||||||
Loan recoveries |
154,034 | 191,132 | 83,357 | |||||||||
BALANCE, end of year |
$ | 6,612,308 | $ | 6,416,691 | $ | 5,311,715 | ||||||
58
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 5 - MORTGAGE SERVICING AND LENDING ACTIVITIES
Mortgages serviced for others, which totaled $444.6 million and $488.5 million at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, are not included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. However, a mortgage servicing asset (MSA) relating to this portfolio is recorded by the Bank as an asset based on calculations using a discounted cash flow model, which incorporates the expected life of the loans, estimated costs to service the loans, servicing fees to be received, and other factors, in accordance with SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. The key assumptions, segmented by interest rate tranches, used to value the MSA at December 31, 2003, were as follows:
Adjustable | ||||||||||||||||
< = 6.00% | 6.01% 7.00% | > = 7.01% | Rate | |||||||||||||
Unpaid principal balance |
$ | 213,668,053 | $ | 133,778,637 | $ | 67,798,600 | $ | 29,403,964 | ||||||||
Number of loans |
1,656 | 1,180 | 706 | 247 | ||||||||||||
Weighted-average term to maturity
(months) |
235 | 280 | 312 | 72 | ||||||||||||
Estimated loan life (months) |
89 | 57 | 38 | 27 | ||||||||||||
Servicing cost per loan per month,
net of ancillary income |
$ | 25 | $ | 25 | $ | 25 | $ | 40 | ||||||||
Discount rate |
10% 13 | % | 9.5% 13 | % | 12.5 | % | 12.5 | % |
The changes in the balance of the MSA were as follows:
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
MSA balance, beginning of year |
$ | 4,614,391 | $ | 6,196,801 | $ | 2,759,687 | ||||||
Additions for capitalized servicing
right premiums |
1,935,108 | 2,227,511 | 4,750,197 | |||||||||
Amortization of MSA |
(2,000,050 | ) | (1,028,810 | ) | (395,354 | ) | ||||||
Valuation allowance adjustments |
(858,000 | ) | (2,781,111 | ) | (917,729 | ) | ||||||
$ | 3,691,449 | $ | 4,614,391 | $ | 6,196,801 | |||||||
59
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 5 - MORTGAGE SERVICING AND LENDING ACTIVITIES - (continued)
The valuation allowance provides for adjustments to the cost basis of the total mortgage servicing assets to estimated fair value. The fair value adjustment is recorded as an adjustment to the income of the Mortgage Team net revenues when recognized. Mortgage Team net revenues consisted of the following:
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
Mortgage loan origination and
processing fee income |
$ | 2,337,879 | $ | 2,513,005 | $ | 1,662,268 | |||||||
Loan servicing fees |
1,193,393 | 1,163,815 | 631,440 | ||||||||||
Net mortgage servicing income
(expense) |
(924,092 | ) | (1,582,410 | ) | 3,445,995 | ||||||||
Gain (loss) on loan sales |
(288,909 | ) | 1,353,772 | (222,371 | ) | ||||||||
Servicing release premium |
253,607 | 461,982 | | ||||||||||
Hedge expense |
(140,206 | ) | (1,720,539 | ) | (1,253,891 | ) | |||||||
Other |
| 3,689 | | ||||||||||
Mortgage Team net revenues |
$ | 2,431,672 | $ | 2,193,314 | $ | 4,263,441 | |||||||
NOTE 6 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
The major classifications of property and equipment are summarized as follows:
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||
Land |
$ | 3,468,310 | $ | 3,491,377 | |||||
Construction in progress |
355,759 | 145,741 | |||||||
Buildings and improvements |
10,171,670 | 10,153,556 | |||||||
Furniture and equipment |
6,730,885 | 6,521,588 | |||||||
Total property and equipment |
20,726,624 | 20,312,262 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
(6,959,715 | ) | (6,128,411 | ) | |||||
Property and equipment, net of
accumulated depreciation |
$ | 13,766,909 | $ | 14,183,851 | |||||
For certain bank branch facilities, Columbia leases office space to third parties. Minimum future rental income from noncancellable leases for the next five years beginning in 2004 is approximately $94,000, $94,000, $80,000, $74,000, and $74,000. Minimum lease rental income for the year 2009 and thereafter is approximately $80,000.
60
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 7 - TIME CERTIFICATES
Time certificates of deposit of $100,000 and over, aggregated $38,333,812 and $44,746,175 at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Brokered time certificates had an aggregate carrying value of $26,170,676 and $16,179,793 at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
At December 31, 2003, the scheduled maturities for all time certificates are as follows:
Years ending December 31, |
2004 | $ | 68,870,645 | ||||
2005 | 22,224,563 | ||||||
2006 | 15,344,435 | ||||||
2007 | 7,344,686 | ||||||
2008 | 6,654,821 | ||||||
Thereafter | 2,308,674 | ||||||
$ | 122,747,824 | ||||||
NOTE 8 - LINES OF CREDIT AND BORROWED FUNDS
The Bank has federal funds line of credit agreements with five financial institutions and the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. Maximum aggregate borrowings available under these lines totaled $31.4 million, with available line of credit funds reduced by other borrowings. These lines support short-term liquidity and cannot be used for more than 1 to 15 consecutive business days, depending on the lending institution. At December 31, 2003 and 2002, there were no borrowings outstanding under these agreements.
The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) of Seattle and has entered into credit arrangement with the FHLB under which authorized borrowings are collateralized by the Banks FHLB stock as well as loans or other instruments which may be pledged. As of December 31, 2003 and 2002, the Bank had total borrowings outstanding with the FHLB of $21,133,465 and $26,284,946, respectively, with no outstanding advances under the Cash Management Advance program. Interest rates for borrowings under the Cash Management Advance agreement fluctuate daily at market rates for each borrowing. Interest rates on notes outstanding range from 1.18% to 6.08%. The Bank had $41,545,535 available for additional borrowings at December 31, 2003.Maximum borrowings available from the FHLB for notes payable, lines of credit, and the Cash Management Advance agreement totaled $62,679,000 at December 31, 2003.
61
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 8 - LINES OF CREDIT AND BORROWED FUNDS - (continued)
The Bank had outstanding notes from the FHLB at December 31, 2003 and 2002, as follows:
December 31, 2003 | December 31, 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted- | Weighted- | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Maturity | Interest | Maturity | Interest | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Year | Rate | Amount | Year | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
$ | 5,921,147 | 2004 | 2.22 | % | $ | 10,728,495 | 2003 | 3.94 | % | |||||||||||||||
3,750,000 | 2005 | 3.17 | % | 3,254,480 | 2004 | 4.47 | % | |||||||||||||||||
3,000,000 | 2006 | 2.70 | % | 3,750,000 | 2005 | 3.17 | % | |||||||||||||||||
6,500,000 | 2007 | 4.78 | % | 1,000,000 | 2006 | 4.65 | % | |||||||||||||||||
1,180,334 | 2008 | 3.63 | % | 6,500,000 | 2007 | 4.78 | % | |||||||||||||||||
781,984 | 2013 | 5.47 | % | 220,334 | 2008 | 6.08 | % | |||||||||||||||||
831,637 | 2013 | 5.47 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 21,133,465 | 3.44 | % | $ | 26,284,946 | 4.20 | % | |||||||||||||||||
The Bank also participates in the U.S. Treasury Departments Treasury Investment Program, which facilitates the acceptance and processing of federal tax deposits. Under this program, the Bank is authorized to accumulate daily tax payments up to authorized limits, and deploy the funds in short-term investments. In exchange, the Bank is required to issue a fully collateralized demand note to the U.S. Treasury and pay interest at the federal funds rate minus 25 basis points. As of December 31, 2003 and 2002, the Bank had $850,000 outstanding under this program.
NOTE 9 - TRUST PREFERRED SECURITIES
In December 2002, Columbia formed a wholly-owned Delaware statutory business trust subsidiary, Columbia Bancorp Trust I (the Trust), which issued $4,000,000 of guaranteed undivided beneficial interests in Columbias Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures (Trust Preferred Securities). These debentures qualify as Tier 1 capital under Federal Reserve Board guidelines. All of the common securities of the Trust are owned by Columbia. The proceeds from the issuance of the common securities and the Trust Preferred Securities were used by the Trust to purchase $4,124,000 of junior subordinated debentures of Columbia. The debentures which represent the sole asset of the Trust, accrue and pay distributions quarterly at a variable rate of 90-day LIBOR plus 3.3% per annum of the stated liquidation value of $1,000 per capital security. Columbia has entered into contractual arrangements which, taken collectively, fully and unconditionally guarantee payment of: (1) accrued and unpaid distributions required to be paid on the Trust Preferred Securities, (2) the redemption price with respect to any Trust Preferred Securities called for redemption by the Trust, and (3) payments due upon a
62
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 9 - TRUST PREFERRED SECURITIES - (continued)
voluntary or involuntary dissolution, winding up or liquidation of the Trust. The Trust Preferred Securities are mandatorily redeemable upon maturity of the debentures on January 7, 2033, or upon earlier redemption as provided in the indenture. Columbia has the right to redeem the debentures purchased by the Trust in whole or in part, on or after January 7, 2008. As specified in the indenture, if the debentures are redeemed prior to maturity, the redemption price will be the principal amount and any accrued but unpaid interest. For the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, Columbia paid interest expense related to the Trust Preferred Securities of $187,162 and $6,803, respectively.
NOTE 10 - INTEREST-RATE SWAP
During January 2003, in connection with the issuance of $4,000,000 of floating-rate Trust Preferred Securities described in Note 9, Columbia entered into an interest-rate swap agreement with an unrelated third party. Under the terms of the agreement, which expires in January 2008, Columbia will pay 3.27% on a notional amount of $4,000,000 and receive credit for the 90-day LIBOR rate on the same amount. The effect of this transaction was the conversion of the $4,000,000 trust preferred issuance from a floating rate at 90-day LIBOR plus 330 basis points to a fixed rate of 6.57% for five years, the point at which Columbia has the option to call the Trust Preferred Securities. Columbia has classified the swap agreement as a cash flow hedge in accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. For the period ended December 31, 2003, the hedge has been highly effective in achieving offsetting cash flows attributable to the hedged risk.
NOTE 11 - INCOME TAXES
The provision for income taxes consists of the following:
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||||
Current tax provision: |
||||||||||||||
Federal |
$ | 5,077,462 | $ | 4,989,761 | $ | 2,597,008 | ||||||||
State |
1,015,005 | 926,292 | 517,244 | |||||||||||
6,092,467 | 5,916,053 | 3,114,252 | ||||||||||||
Deferred tax (benefit) expense: |
||||||||||||||
Federal |
(479,137 | ) | (613,200 | ) | 1,117,892 | |||||||||
State |
(49,021 | ) | (79,356 | ) | 144,668 | |||||||||
(528,158 | ) | (692,556 | ) | 1,262,560 | ||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
$ | 5,564,309 | $ | 5,223,497 | $ | 4,376,812 | ||||||||
63
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 11 - INCOME TAXES - (continued)
The components of the deferred income tax (benefit) expense consist of the following:
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
Mortgage servicing rights |
$ | (350,718 | ) | $ | (601,316 | ) | $ | 1,306,104 | |||||
Loan loss provision not deductible
for tax |
(141,778 | ) | (371,906 | ) | (275,426 | ) | |||||||
Difference between book and tax
depreciation methods |
(117,890 | ) | 217,179 | 195,279 | |||||||||
Difference between accrual and
cash basis tax reporting |
| | (17,406 | ) | |||||||||
Deferred compensation |
(53,472 | ) | (22,933 | ) | 7,083 | ||||||||
Difference between book and tax
recognition of Federal Home
Loan Bank stock dividends |
54,957 | 60,031 | 46,926 | ||||||||||
Cash surrender value greater than
investment in life insurance policies |
55,186 | 101,584 | | ||||||||||
Other differences |
25,557 | (75,195 | ) | | |||||||||
Deferred income tax (benefit)
expense |
$ | (528,158 | ) | $ | (692,556 | ) | $ | 1,262,560 | |||||
The net deferred tax asset (liability) consists of the following:
2003 | 2002 | |||||||||
Deferred tax assets: |
||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
$ | 2,355,307 | $ | 2,213,529 | ||||||
Purchased state tax credits |
300,600 | | ||||||||
Deferred compensation |
198,201 | 144,729 | ||||||||
Other |
49,638 | 75,195 | ||||||||
2,903,746 | 2,433,453 | |||||||||
Deferred tax liabilities: |
||||||||||
Mortgage servicing rights |
(1,402,751 | ) | (1,753,469 | ) | ||||||
Accumulated depreciation |
(959,847 | ) | (1,077,737 | ) | ||||||
Cash surrender value greater than life insurance
policies |
(156,770 | ) | (101,584 | ) | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank stock dividends |
(321,511 | ) | (266,554 | ) | ||||||
(2,840,879 | ) | (3,199,344 | ) | |||||||
Net deferred tax asset (liability) |
$ | 62,867 | $ | (765,891 | ) | |||||
64
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 11 - INCOME TAXES - (continued)
Management believes, based upon Columbias historical performance, that the deferred tax assets will be realized in the normal course of operations and, accordingly, management has not reduced deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance.
The tax provision differs from the combined federal and state statutory rate of 38.6% due principally to the effect of tax exemptions for interest received on municipal investments and the amortization of nondeductible goodwill for tax purposes.
A reconciliation between the combined federal and state income tax rate and the effective tax rate is as follows:
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
Federal income taxes at statutory rate |
$ | 5,234,876 | $ | 4,965,565 | $ | 3,995,180 | ||||||
State income tax expense, net of
federal income tax benefit |
534,522 | 549,190 | 474,257 | |||||||||
Effect of nontaxable interest income |
(236,035 | ) | (257,239 | ) | (263,510 | ) | ||||||
Effect of nondeductible goodwill
amortization |
| | 213,732 | |||||||||
Other |
30,946 | (34,019 | ) | (42,847 | ) | |||||||
$ | 5,564,309 | $ | 5,223,497 | $ | 4,376,812 | |||||||
36 | % | 36 | % | 37 | % | |||||||
65
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 12 - EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the year, retroactively adjusted for stock dividends and splits. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution that could occur if common shares were issued pursuant to the exercise of options under existing stock option plans. The following table illustrates the computations of basic and diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001.
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
Basic earnings per share: |
|||||||||||||
Income available to common shareholders |
$ | 9,833,796 | $ | 9,381,105 | $ | 7,373,717 | |||||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
8,716,572 | 8,900,643 | 8,836,431 | ||||||||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 1.13 | $ | 1.05 | $ | 0.83 | |||||||
Diluted earnings per share: |
|||||||||||||
Income available to common shareholders |
$ | 9,833,796 | $ | 9,381,105 | $ | 7,373,717 | |||||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
8,716,572 | 8,900,643 | 8,836,431 | ||||||||||
Net effect of dilutive stock options based
on the treasury stock method using
average market price |
277,899 | 232,094 | 231,862 | ||||||||||
Weighted-average common shares
outstanding and common stock
equivalents |
8,994,471 | 9,132,737 | 9,068,293 | ||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 1.09 | $ | 1.03 | $ | 0.81 | |||||||
Outstanding common stock options excluded from diluted earnings per share because their impact on the calculation would have been antidilutive totaled 20,000, 160,000, and 3,000 at December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively.
66
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 13 - STOCK OPTION PLAN
Columbia maintains a stock incentive plan originally adopted by the Bank in 1993 prior to Columbias formation. The plan, most recently amended in January 2002 and ratified by the shareholders in April 2002, allows for the granting of both incentive and nonstatutory stock options. The option price for incentive stock options cannot be less than 100% of the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant. The stock options expire ten years from the date of grant. The option price, number of shares granted recipients, and duration for the plan stock options are determined and approved by the Board of Directors.
The following summarizes options available and outstanding under this plan, retroactively adjusted for stock dividends and splits.
Weighted- | Weighted- | ||||||||||||||||||||
Non- | Average | Average | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | Incentive | statutory | Exercise | Fair | |||||||||||||||||
Options | Options | Options | Price | Value | |||||||||||||||||
Options under grant and exercisable -
December 31, 2000 |
404,908 | 326,401 | 78,507 | $ | 5.07 | ||||||||||||||||
Options granted in 2001: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Incentive stock options |
297,825 | 297,825 | | $ | 7.50 | $ | 1.39 | ||||||||||||||
Nonstatutory stock options |
61,202 | | 61,202 | $ | 8.43 | $ | 1.19 | ||||||||||||||
Gifted shares in 2001 |
440 | | 440 | $ | | ||||||||||||||||
Options exercised in 2001: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Incentive stock options |
(43,735 | ) | (43,735 | ) | | $ | 4.80 | ||||||||||||||
Nonstatutory stock options |
(19,687 | ) | | (19,687 | ) | $ | 4.96 | ||||||||||||||
Options expired or forfeited in 2001 |
(2,750 | ) | (1,650 | ) | (1,100 | ) | $ | 6.71 | |||||||||||||
Options under grant and exercisable -
December 31, 2001 |
698,203 | 578,841 | 119,362 | $ | 6.43 | ||||||||||||||||
Options granted in 2002: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Incentive stock options |
168,677 | 168,677 | | $ | 13.45 | $ | 4.97 | ||||||||||||||
Nonstatutory stock options |
15,400 | | 15,400 | $ | 10.65 | $ | 4.08 | ||||||||||||||
Options exercised in 2002: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Incentive stock options |
(137,093 | ) | (137,093 | ) | | $ | 5.79 | ||||||||||||||
Nonstatutory stock options |
(32,003 | ) | | (32,003 | ) | $ | 6.71 | ||||||||||||||
Options expired or forfeited in 2002 |
(5,940 | ) | (5,940 | ) | | $ | 6.53 | ||||||||||||||
Options under grant and exercisable -
December 31, 2002 |
707,244 | 604,485 | 102,759 | $ | 8.21 |
67
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 13 - STOCK OPTION PLAN - (continued)
Weighted- | Weighted- | ||||||||||||||||||||
Non- | Average | Average | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | Incentive | statutory | Exercise | Fair | |||||||||||||||||
Options | Options | Options | Price | Value | |||||||||||||||||
Options granted in 2003: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Incentive stock options |
30,432 | 30,432 | | $ | 13.64 | $ | 5.05 | ||||||||||||||
Nonstatutory stock options |
26,167 | | 26,167 | $ | 16.19 | $ | 6.02 | ||||||||||||||
Options exercised in 2003: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Incentive stock options |
(98,082 | ) | (98,082 | ) | | $ | 6.37 | ||||||||||||||
Nonstatutory stock options |
(20,894 | ) | | (20,894 | ) | $ | 7.56 | ||||||||||||||
Options expired or forfeited in 2003 |
(5,990 | ) | (5,990 | ) | | $ | 12.91 | ||||||||||||||
Options
under grant and exercisable
December 31, 2003 |
638,877 | 530,845 | 108,032 | $ | 9.06 | ||||||||||||||||
Options reserved December 31, 2003 |
236,181 | ||||||||||||||||||||
68
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 13 - STOCK OPTION PLAN - (continued)
The following table summarizes information regarding stock options outstanding at December 31, 2003, under Columbias stock option plan:
Incentive Stock Options | Nonstatutory Stock Options | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Number | Average | Number | Average | |||||||||||||||||||||
of Options | Remaining | of Options | Remaining | |||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise | Outstanding | Contractual Life | Exercise | Outstanding | Contractual Life | |||||||||||||||||||
Price | and Exercisable | (in years) | Price | and Exercisable | (in years) | |||||||||||||||||||
$ | 3.04 | 23,847 | 1.5 | $ | 3.04 | 14,850 | 1.5 | |||||||||||||||||
$ | 5.08 | 50,369 | 3.6 | $ | 5.08 | 13,202 | 3.6 | |||||||||||||||||
$ | 10.45 | 3,300 | 4.3 | $ | 6.25 | 3,657 | 6.0 | |||||||||||||||||
$ | 7.27 | 1,100 | 5.4 | $ | 6.59 | 5,197 | 7.1 | |||||||||||||||||
$ | 7.05 | 2,200 | 5.4 | $ | 8.96 | 37,642 | 8.0 | |||||||||||||||||
$ | 6.25 | 67,508 | 6.0 | $ | 10.65 | 9,817 | 8.6 | |||||||||||||||||
$ | 6.59 | 104,679 | 7.1 | $ | 13.64 | 3,667 | 9.0 | |||||||||||||||||
$ | 7.50 | 1,650 | 7.5 | $ | 16.61 | 20,000 | 9.9 | |||||||||||||||||
$ | 8.96 | 97,962 | 8.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 10.09 | 2,145 | 8.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 10.36 | 2,200 | 8.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 13.55 | 144,003 | 9.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 13.64 | 27,132 | 9.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 13.54 | 550 | 9.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 13.77 | 2,200 | 9.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
530,845 | 108,032 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Under the 2002 amended stock option plan, an aggregate of no more than 10% of the issued and outstanding shares of Columbias common stock is available for award or grant. As of December 31, 2003, this percentage applied to Columbias issued and outstanding common stock represented 875,058 shares.
69
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 14 - EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS AND AGREEMENTS
Columbia has established an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) for the benefit of its employees. The ESOP allows participation by all employees over the age of 20 who have also met minimum service requirements. Contributions to the ESOP are at the discretion of the Board of Directors and are used to purchase shares of Columbias common stock. Employees are not permitted to contribute individually to the ESOP but vest in their proportionate share of the ESOP interest through six years of participation. The allocated shares in the ESOP are considered outstanding for purposes of calculating earnings per share. For the years ending December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001, Columbia contributed $100,000, $100,000, and $280,000, respectively, to the ESOP.
The ESOPs assets as of December 31 were as follows:
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Allocated shares, retroactively adjusted
for stock dividends and splits |
344,217 | 397,590 | ||||||
Cash on hand |
$ | 23,090 | $ | 36,151 | ||||
Columbia has also adopted a 401(k) savings investment plan which allows employees to defer certain amounts of compensation for income tax purposes under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Essentially, all employees over the age of 18 are eligible to participate in the plan. Employees may elect to defer and contribute up to the statutory limits. Their contributions and those of Columbia, which are limited to 100% of employee contributions up to 4% of total participant compensation, are invested by plan trustees in employee-designated funds. For the years ending December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001, Columbia contributed approximately $451,000, $456,000, and $128,000, respectively, to the plan.
Columbia has established an employee incentive compensation program which provides eligible participants additional compensation based upon the achievement of certain Bank goals. For the years ending December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001, additional compensation of approximately $1,371,000, $2,227,000, and $1,302,000, respectively, was paid to eligible employees pursuant to this program.
Columbia entered into both employment and retirement agreements, beginning in 1996 and later amended, with its former chief executive officer. The employment agreement provided for the former chief executive officers salary and customary benefits until the agreement terminated upon retirement in May 2001. The retirement agreement provides annual post-retirement compensation for a seven-year period after the former chief executive officers retirement. Columbias obligation under the agreement was partially funded with a $120,000 interest-earning investment and is being paid in annual installments of $48,000 plus interest earned on the $120,000 of invested funds. At December 31, 2003, Columbia had a liability recorded of approximately $207,000 as its obligation for past services pursuant to the retirement agreement.
70
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 14 - EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS AND AGREEMENTS - (continued)
During 2001, Columbia purchased bank-owned life insurance (BOLI) to support life insurance, salary continuation, and deferred compensation benefits for certain key employees. As of December 31, 2003 and 2002, Columbia recognized a salary continuation liability of $226,405 and $121,076, respectively, and an elective deferred compensation liability of $87,842 and $19,353, respectively, pursuant to these benefit plans. Payments under the salary continuation component commence when the respective key employee reaches the age of 62 and the economic value of the insurance coverage allocated to the employees estate is then reported as taxable income to that employee. As of December 31, 2003 and 2002, the cash surrender value of the BOLI was $3,540,222 and $3,394,999, respectively.
During 2002, Columbia entered into an employment agreement for a phantom stock grant with the chief executive officer (CEO). The CEO received 15,764 units at a price of $8.96, retroactively adjusted for stock dividends and splits, and exercisable any time after December 31, 2002. Upon exercise of the grant, the CEO will receive a cash payment equal to the difference between the unit grant price and the common stock price for each unit on the date of exercise. As of December 31, 2003, no units have been exercised. Columbia has recognized a liability and a corresponding charge to salaries and employee benefits for the phantom stock grant in the amount of $130,626 and $73,231 as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
NOTE 15 - TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES
Certain directors, executive officers, and principal stockholders are customers of and have had banking transactions with the Bank, and the Bank expects to have such transactions in the future. All loans and commitments to loan included in such transactions were made in compliance with applicable laws on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons and do not involve more than the normal risk of collectibility or present any other unfavorable features. The amount of loans outstanding to directors, executive officers, principal shareholders, and companies with which they are associated was as follows:
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
BALANCE, beginning of year |
$ | 11,082,369 | $ | 7,107,507 | ||||
Loans made |
1,112,282 | 6,227,476 | ||||||
Loans repaid |
(1,842,487 | ) | (2,252,614 | ) | ||||
BALANCE, end of year |
$ | 10,352,164 | $ | 11,082,369 | ||||
71
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 16 - CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK
All of the Banks loans, commitments, and commercial and standby letters of credit have been granted to customers in the Banks market areas. The majority of such customers are also depositors of the Bank. Investments in state and municipal securities are not significantly concentrated within any one region of the United States. The concentrations of credit by type of loan are set forth in Note 4. The distribution of commitments to extend credit approximates the distribution of loans outstanding. Commercial and standby letters of credit were granted primarily to commercial borrowers as of December 31, 2003. The Banks loan policies do not allow the extension of credit to any single borrower or group of related borrowers in excess of $1,250,000 without approval from either the Banks loan committee, president, or chief credit officer.
NOTE 17 - FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE-SHEET RISK
In the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers, the Bank is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and the issuance of letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. The contract amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Bank has in particular classes of financial instruments.
The Banks exposure to credit loss, in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and letters of credit written, is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments.
The Bank may or may not require collateral or other security to support financial instruments with credit risk, depending on its loan underwriting guidelines.
Contract Amounts | |||||||||
December 31, | |||||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||
Financial instruments whose contract amounts
contain credit risk: |
|||||||||
Commitments to extend credit |
$ | 162,232,037 | $ | 148,938,344 | |||||
Undisbursed credit card lines of credit |
17,332,801 | 15,219,916 | |||||||
Commercial and standby letters of credit |
2,466,414 | 2,654,194 | |||||||
$ | 182,031,252 | $ | 166,812,454 | ||||||
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Bank upon an extension of credit, is based on managements credit evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property and equipment, and income-producing properties.
72
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 17 - FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE-SHEET RISK - (continued)
Letters of credit written are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper, bond financing, and similar transactions. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The Bank holds cash, marketable securities, or real estate as collateral supporting those commitments for which collateral is deemed necessary.
NOTE 18 - RISK MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
During the fourth quarter of 2003, the Bank discontinued its practice of entering into derivative financial instruments to mitigate the risk that a change in interest rates might result in a decline in the value of the Mortgage Teams committed loan pipeline and adversely impact revenues. The Mortgage Team has continued to generate mortgage loans for sale; however, loans produced are sold on a best efforts basis. The overall consideration received for best efforts sales generally results in less revenue on a per loan basis. The execution of best efforts results in a loan commitment to an investor 30 to 60 days prior to funding. Under best efforts, interest rate risk is shifted away from the Bank and onto the investor.
Prior to the recent change, the Banks policy required a hedge using forward contracts for the sale of mortgage-backed securities or using purchase/sale option contracts, designated as fair value hedges, when the pipeline of committed fixed-rate conforming loans aggregated certain dollar thresholds. The hedge transactions were entered into to protect the Banks mortgage loan pipeline from interest rate risks that might arise from suddenly increasing or falling rates during the loan origination period through delivery to third-party purchases. To mitigate this risk, the Bank anticipated potential interest rate changes and factors that influenced pipeline fallout, which represented the percentage of loans that were not expected to close, in calculating the amount of derivative instruments to execute.
There were no forward sales or option contracts outstanding as of December 31, 2003. As of December 31, 2002, forward sales and option contracts to sell mortgage-backed securities were $27,000,000 in maturities of up to two months. Derivative instruments as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, had an unrealized loss of $322,248 and an unrealized gain of $120,969, respectively, each recognized in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. The mortgage-backed securities that were to be delivered under these contracts were fixed-rate and generally corresponded with the composition of the Banks committed loan pipeline. Changes in the fair value of the mortgage loan commitments and forward sales contracts have been recognized in Mortgage Team net revenues in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.
In a falling interest rate environment, the Bank expected to recognize a loss on the derivative instrument and a gain on the sale of funded loans from the committed loan pipeline. The effectiveness of the Banks hedging activities was measured by assessing the net losses and gains on derivative instruments realized, unrealized premiums and discounts on loan sales, and yield spread premium payments on mortgage loans sold.
73
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 18 - RISK MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES - (continued)
The hedge ineffectiveness aggregated to losses of $429,115, $366,767, and $1,476,262 for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003. Hedge ineffectiveness resulted from the Banks decision to subsidize loan pricing in order to increase its mortgage servicing asset volume. Revenues from servicing rights premiums were not considered in the measure of effectiveness. The ineffectiveness from hedging activities, along with the servicing retained premiums, servicing release premiums, servicing income, and other servicing expenses, are included in Mortgage Team net revenues in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.
As of December 31, 2003 and 2002, the Bank had short-term rate and point commitments amounting to $3,800,000 and $27,000,000, respectively, to fund fixed-rate mortgage loan applications in process. Substantially all of these commitments are for periods of 60 days or less. After funding and sale of the mortgage loans, the Banks exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the mortgagor is limited. Prior to sale of the loan, the Bank has potential exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparty. The Bank manages this credit risk by selecting only well established, financially strong counterparties.
NOTE 19 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Operating lease commitments - As of December 31, 2003, Columbia leased certain properties. Future minimum lease commitments are as follows:
Years ending December 31, |
2004 | $ | 285,000 | ||||
2005 | 261,000 | ||||||
2006 | 237,000 | ||||||
2007 | 238,000 | ||||||
2008 | 240,000 | ||||||
Thereafter | 855,000 | ||||||
$ | 2,116,000 | ||||||
Rental expense for all operating leases was $328,721, $261,972, and $166,189 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively.
Legal contingencies - Columbia may become a defendant in certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel, there are no matters presently known to Columbia that are expected to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition of Columbia.
74
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 20 - PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Condensed financial information for Columbia Bancorp (unconsolidated parent company only) is as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||
Cash |
$ | 1,018,312 | $ | 863,808 | ||||||
Investment security held-to-maturity |
81,258 | 81,579 | ||||||||
Corporate equity securities |
78,750 | 112,987 | ||||||||
Investment in subsidiary Bank |
60,341,388 | 53,254,732 | ||||||||
Investment in Columbia Bancorp Trust I |
125,410 | 124,000 | ||||||||
Deferred tax asset |
333,855 | 122,704 | ||||||||
Other assets |
1,139,640 | 677,409 | ||||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 63,118,613 | $ | 55,237,219 | ||||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||||
Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures |
$ | 4,124,000 | $ | 4,124,000 | ||||||
Interest-rate swap liability |
20,221 | | ||||||||
Dividend payable |
787,552 | 628,990 | ||||||||
Deferred compensation plan liability |
181,686 | 143,496 | ||||||||
Employee benefit withholding |
135,530 | 143,800 | ||||||||
Interest and other payables |
65,160 | 6,552 | ||||||||
Total liabilities |
5,314,149 | 5,046,838 | ||||||||
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||||
Common stock |
31,520,099 | 17,841,700 | ||||||||
Retained earnings |
26,252,366 | 32,174,431 | ||||||||
Accumulated comprehensive income,
net of tax |
31,999 | 174,250 | ||||||||
Total shareholders equity |
57,804,464 | 50,190,381 | ||||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY |
$ | 63,118,613 | $ | 55,237,219 | ||||||
75
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 20 - PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL INFORMATION - (continued)
Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||||
REVENUES |
|||||||||||||||
Equity in undistributed earnings
of subsidiaries |
$ | 7,213,593 | $ | 7,208,039 | $ | 4,592,787 | |||||||||
Dividends |
2,909,603 | 2,500,000 | 3,150,000 | ||||||||||||
Other |
449,502 | 314,403 | | ||||||||||||
EXPENSES |
|||||||||||||||
Administrative and other expenses |
(738,902 | ) | (641,337 | ) | (369,070 | ) | |||||||||
Net income |
$ | 9,833,796 | $ | 9,381,105 | $ | 7,373,717 | |||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 9,833,796 | $ | 9,381,105 | $ | 7,373,717 | |||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net
income to net cash from
operating activities: |
|||||||||||||||
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries |
(7,213,593 | ) | (7,208,039 | ) | (4,592,787 | ) | |||||||||
Gain on sale of corporate equity securities |
(457,265 | ) | (294,133 | ) | | ||||||||||
Loss on write-down of land |
23,067 | | | ||||||||||||
Changes in other assets and liabilities |
(394,822 | ) | (156,406 | ) | (272,887 | ) | |||||||||
Net cash from operating activities |
1,791,183 | 1,722,527 | 2,508,043 | ||||||||||||
76
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 20 - PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL INFORMATION - (continued)
Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|||||||||||||||
Investment in Columbia Bancorp
Trust I |
$ | | $ | (124,000 | ) | $ | | ||||||||
Purchase of corporate equity
securities |
(75,000 | ) | | | |||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of corporate
equity securities |
570,252 | 481,146 | | ||||||||||||
Purchase of held-to-maturity
security |
| (81,579 | ) | | |||||||||||
Net cash from investing activities |
495,252 | 275,567 | | ||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|||||||||||||||
Dividends paid and cash paid for
fractional shares |
(2,666,573 | ) | (2,593,588 | ) | (2,569,581 | ) | |||||||||
Repurchase of common stock |
(247,995 | ) | (4,023,170 | ) | (427,503 | ) | |||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of Junior
Subordinated Deferrable Interest
Debentures |
| 4,124,000 | | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from the exercise of
stock options |
782,637 | 1,008,572 | 307,455 | ||||||||||||
Net cash from financing activities |
(2,131,931 | ) | (1,484,186 | ) | (2,689,629 | ) | |||||||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
154,504 | 513,908 | (181,586 | ) | |||||||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, Beginning of year |
863,808 | 349,900 | 531,486 | ||||||||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, End of year |
$ | 1,018,312 | $ | 863,808 | $ | 349,900 | |||||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized loss or gain on
available-for-sale securities, net of tax |
$ | (122,030 | ) | $ | (163,538 | ) | $ | 422,705 | |||||||
Change in fair value of interest-rate swap |
$ | (20,221 | ) | | $ | | |||||||||
Cash dividend payable |
$ | 787,552 | $ | 628,990 | $ | 642,858 | |||||||||
77
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 21 - REGULATORY MATTERS
Columbia and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by federal and state banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on a banks financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, banks must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the banks assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk-weightings, and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require Columbia and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier 1 capital to average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of December 31, 2003, that Columbia and the Bank meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.
As of the most recent notifications from their regulatory agencies, Columbia and the Bank were categorized as well-capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as adequately capitalized, Columbia and the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based capital, Tier 1 risk-based capital, and Tier 1 leverage capital ratios as set forth in the table below. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes may have changed the institutions category.
To Be Well- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capitalized Under | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For Capital | Prompt Corrective | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Actual | Adequacy Purposes | Action Provisions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | |||||||||||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2003 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total capital to risk-
weighted assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbia Bancorp |
$ | 60,431 | 11.7 | % | $ | 41,285 | ³8 | % | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
Columbia River Bank |
$ | 58,968 | 11.5 | % | $ | 41,164 | ³8 | % | $ | 51,455 | ³10 | % | ||||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital to risk-
weighted assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbia Bancorp |
$ | 53,997 | 10.5 | % | $ | 20,649 | ³4 | % | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
Columbia River Bank |
$ | 52,534 | 10.2 | % | $ | 20,581 | ³4 | % | $ | 30,872 | ³6 | % | ||||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital to average
assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbia Bancorp |
$ | 53,997 | 9.2 | % | $ | 23,501 | ³4 | % | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
Columbia River Bank |
$ | 52,534 | 9.0 | % | $ | 23,453 | ³4 | % | $ | 29,316 | ³5 | % |
78
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 21 - REGULATORY MATTERS - (continued)
To Be Well- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capitalized Under | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For Capital | Prompt Corrective | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Actual | Adequacy Purposes | Action Provisions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | |||||||||||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2002 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total capital to risk-
weighted assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbia Bancorp |
$ | 52,116 | 11.0 | % | $ | 38,041 | ³8 | % | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
Columbia River Bank |
$ | 51,168 | 10.8 | % | $ | 37,996 | ³8 | % | $ | 47,458 | ³10 | % | ||||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital to risk-
weighted assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbia Bancorp |
$ | 46,166 | 9.7 | % | $ | 19,020 | ³4 | % | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
Columbia River Bank |
$ | 45,230 | 9.5 | % | $ | 18,983 | ³4 | % | $ | 28,475 | ³6 | % | ||||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital to average
assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbia Bancorp |
$ | 46,166 | 8.6 | % | $ | 21,558 | ³4 | % | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
Columbia River Bank |
$ | 45,230 | 8.4 | % | $ | 21,518 | ³4 | % | $ | 26,898 | ³5 | % |
79
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 22 - FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The following table estimates fair values and the related carrying values of Columbias financial instruments (in thousands):
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||||
Estimated | Estimated | ||||||||||||||||
Carrying | Fair | Carrying | Fair | ||||||||||||||
Amount | Value | Amount | Value | ||||||||||||||
Financial assets: |
|||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 33,810 | $ | 33,810 | $ | 28,414 | $ | 28,414 | |||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits with banks |
$ | 5,101 | $ | 5,101 | $ | 8,552 | $ | 8,552 | |||||||||
Federal funds sold |
$ | 14,956 | $ | 14,956 | $ | 3,735 | $ | 3,735 | |||||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale |
$ | 13,876 | $ | 13,876 | $ | 14,750 | $ | 14,750 | |||||||||
Investment securities held-to-maturity |
$ | 14,964 | $ | 15,843 | $ | 18,600 | $ | 19,439 | |||||||||
Restricted equity securities |
$ | 2,843 | $ | 2,843 | $ | 2,698 | $ | 2,698 | |||||||||
Loans held-for-sale |
$ | 2,792 | $ | 2,792 | $ | 8,770 | $ | 8,770 | |||||||||
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses
and unearned loan fees |
$ | 461,558 | $ | 465,772 | $ | 423,918 | $ | 423,918 | |||||||||
Mortgage servicing asset |
$ | 3,691 | $ | 3,691 | $ | 4,614 | $ | 4,614 | |||||||||
Financial liabilities: |
|||||||||||||||||
Demand and savings deposits |
$ | 373,610 | $ | 373,610 | $ | 347,112 | $ | 347,112 | |||||||||
Time certificates |
$ | 122,748 | $ | 126,048 | $ | 111,512 | $ | 113,642 | |||||||||
Notes payable |
$ | 21,983 | $ | 22,345 | $ | 27,135 | $ | 27,999 | |||||||||
Junior Subordinated Deferrable
Interest Debentures |
$ | 4,000 | $ | 4,000 | $ | 4,000 | $ | 4,000 |
While estimates of fair value are based on managements judgment of the most appropriate factors, there is no assurance that were Columbia to dispose of such items at December 31, 2003 and 2002, the estimated fair values would necessarily be achieved at that date, since market values may differ depending on various circumstances. The estimated fair values at December 31, 2003 and 2002, should not necessarily be relied upon at subsequent dates.
In addition, other assets and liabilities of Columbia that are not defined as financial instruments are not included in the above disclosures, such as property and equipment. Also, nonfinancial instruments typically not recognized in the consolidated financial statements nevertheless may have value but are not included in the above disclosures. These include, among other items, the estimated earnings power of core deposit accounts, the earnings potential of loan servicing rights, the trained work force, customer goodwill, and similar items.
80
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 23 - SEGMENT INFORMATION
Columbia operates two primary segments, the community banking segment and the mortgage banking segment. The community banking segment consists of Columbias subsidiary, Columbia River Bank, which operates 18 branch facilities in Oregon and Washington. The Bank offers loan, investment, and deposit products to its customers who range from individuals to medium-size agricultural and commercial companies. The mortgage banking segment consists of the Mortgage Team, with administrative offices in Bend, Oregon, and an additional eight offices in Oregon. The Mortgage Team offers a full range of mortgage lending services and products to its clients.
In 2002, management evaluated the internal controls and accounting processes of the Mortgage Team. As a result of this evaluation, certain activities were reclassified for internal financial statement purposes, thus affecting account level detail of the internal segment reporting process. Due to the overall volume and nature of transactions that impact secondary marketing activities, management determined it to be impracticable and of minimal benefit to restate prior periods for these account reclassification changes. The overall performance of the Bank and the overall composition of the reportable segments remain unchanged as a result of these internal segment reporting process changes.
Financial information that Columbias management uses to evaluate the reportable segments and the reconciliation to Columbias consolidated results are summarized as follows (in thousands):
Community | Mortgage | |||||||||||
Banking | Banking | Consolidated | ||||||||||
December 31, 2003 |
||||||||||||
Net interest income before provision for
loan losses |
$ | 30,998 | $ | 401 | $ | 31,399 | ||||||
Noninterest income |
$ | 3,808 | $ | 5,116 | $ | 8,924 | ||||||
Mortgage servicing asset amortization |
$ | | $ | 2,000 | $ | 2,000 | ||||||
Impairment of mortgage servicing rights |
$ | | $ | 858 | $ | 858 | ||||||
Salaries and benefits |
$ | 10,812 | $ | 2,244 | $ | 13,056 | ||||||
Occupancy expense, excluding depreciation |
$ | 749 | $ | 157 | $ | 906 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
$ | 1,260 | $ | 91 | $ | 1,351 | ||||||
Income (loss) before provision for income
taxes |
$ | 15,737 | $ | (339 | ) | $ | 15,398 | |||||
Goodwill |
$ | 7,389 | $ | | $ | 7,389 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 575,463 | $ | 8,673 | $ | 584,136 |
81
COLUMBIA BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 23 - SEGMENT INFORMATION - (continued)
Community | Mortgage | |||||||||||
Banking | Banking | Consolidated | ||||||||||
December 31, 2002 |
||||||||||||
Net interest income before provision for
loan losses |
$ | 29,417 | $ | 417 | $ | 29,834 | ||||||
Noninterest income |
$ | 2,780 | $ | 5,771 | $ | 8,551 | ||||||
Mortgage servicing asset amortization |
$ | | $ | 1,029 | $ | 1,029 | ||||||
Impairment of mortgage servicing rights |
$ | | $ | 2,781 | $ | 2,781 | ||||||
Salaries and benefits |
$ | 10,310 | $ | 2,750 | $ | 13,060 | ||||||
Occupancy expense, excluding depreciation |
$ | 668 | $ | 151 | $ | 819 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
$ | 1,141 | $ | 98 | $ | 1,239 | ||||||
Income (loss) before provision for income
taxes |
$ | 15,883 | $ | (1,278 | ) | $ | 14,605 | |||||
Goodwill |
$ | 7,389 | $ | | $ | 7,389 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 526,202 | $ | 18,124 | $ | 544,326 | ||||||
December 31, 2001 |
||||||||||||
Net interest income before provision for
loan losses |
$ | 22,639 | $ | 856 | $ | 23,495 | ||||||
Noninterest income |
$ | 3,558 | $ | 5,636 | $ | 9,194 | ||||||
Mortgage servicing asset amortization |
$ | | $ | 395 | $ | 395 | ||||||
Impairment of mortgage servicing rights |
$ | | $ | 918 | $ | 918 | ||||||
Salaries and benefits |
$ | 8,689 | $ | 2,733 | $ | 11,422 | ||||||
Occupancy expense, excluding depreciation |
$ | 576 | $ | 115 | $ | 691 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
$ | 1,065 | $ | 74 | $ | 1,139 | ||||||
Goodwill amortization |
$ | 629 | $ | | $ | 629 | ||||||
Income before provision for income taxes |
$ | 9,949 | $ | 1,802 | $ | 11,751 | ||||||
Goodwill |
$ | 7,389 | $ | | $ | 7,389 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 452,260 | $ | 29,947 | $ | 482,207 |
The mortgage banking segment receives an intercompany cost-of-funds allocation, based on the average outstanding balance of the mortgage banking loans. This allocation is eliminated in consolidation; however, it appears as interest income for the community banking segment and interest expense in the mortgage banking segment in the tables above. For the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001, the allocation was approximately $332,000, $950,000, and $882,000, respectively.
82
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
There were no changes in or disagreements with accountants regarding accounting and financial disclosure matters during the year ended December 31, 2003.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of the end of the fiscal year covered by this report, management has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Our principal executive and financial officers supervised and participated in this evaluation. Based upon this evaluation our principal executive and financial officers each conclude that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information required to be include in our periodic SEC reports. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon various assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any of our plans, products or procedures will succeed in achieving their intended goals under future conditions. In addition, there have been no significant changes in our internal controls, or in other factors that could significantly affect our internal controls subsequent to our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies or material weaknesses.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Information regarding directors of Columbia who are standing for reelection is set forth under Election of Directors in Columbias Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareowners and Proxy Statement to be filed within 120 days after Columbias year end of December 31, 2003 (the Proxy Statement), which information is incorporated herein by reference.
The names of the directors and executive officers of Columbia and their employer and principal occupation as of the date hereof are set forth below.
Directors:
Donald T. Mitchell, Chairman, Lumber Broker, Retired
Robert L.R. Bailey, Orchard View Farms, Owner
Charles F. Beardsley, Hershner & Bell Real Estate & Insurance, Owner
Richard E. Betz, Royal Columbia Farms, Inc, Bud-Rich Potato, Inc, Owner
William A. Booth, Booth & Kelly Real Estate & Insurance, Owner
Dennis L. Carver, Goldendale Chiropractic Clinic, Chiropractor/Owner
Roger L. Christensen, Columbia Bancorp and Columbia River Bank, President & Chief Executive Officer
Terry L. Cochran, Banker, Retired
Jim J. Doran, Jim Doran Chevrolet Oldsmobile, Jim Doran Dodge Chrysler, Owner
Jean S. McKinney, McKinney Ranch, Owner
Executive Officers:
Roger L. Christensen, Columbia Bancorp & Columbia River Bank, President & Chief Executive Officer
R. Shane Correa, Columbia River Bank, Executive Vice President & Regional President
James C. McCall, Columbia River Bank, Executive Vice President & Chief Operating Officer
Craig J. Ortega, Columbia River Bank, Executive Vice President & Head of Community Banking
Greg B. Spear, Columbia Bancorp & Columbia River Bank, Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
Britt W. Thomas, Columbia River Bank, Executive Vice President & Chief Credit Officer
Code of Ethics
83
Columbia has adopted a code of business conduct and ethics for directors, officers (including Columbias principal executive officer, principal financial officer and controller) and financial personnel, known as the Code of Ethics Policy. The Code of Ethics Policy is available on Columbias website at www.columbiabancorp.com. Shareholders may request a free copy of the Code of Ethics Policy from:
Columbia Bancorp |
Attn: Investor Relations |
P.O. Box 1050 |
The Dalles OR 97058 |
541.298.6649 |
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND REPORT OF COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Information regarding Columbias compensation of its named executive officers is set forth under Executive Compensation in the Proxy Statement, which information is incorporated herein by reference. Information regarding Columbias compensation of its directors is set forth under Director Compensation in the Proxy Statement, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
Information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners, directors and executive officers is set forth under Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Mangement in the Proxy Statement, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Information regarding certain relationships and related transactions is set forth under Certain Relationships and Related Transactions in the Proxy Statement, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Information regarding principal auditor fees and services is set forth under Principal Auditor Fees and Services, in the Proxy Statement, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) Exhibits.
The following documents are filed as part of this report and are incorporated herein by reference from the Registrants 2003 Annual Report, and are being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of Columbia Bancorps Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
(i) | Independent Auditors Report | ||
(ii) | Consolidated Balance Sheets for the Years Ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 | ||
(iii) | Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001 | ||
(iv) | Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001 | ||
(v) | Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 | ||
(vi) | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
84
The following documents are not included in this 2003 Annual Report, but are either being filed with, or incorporated by reference into, Columbia Bancorps Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
3.1 | Articles of Incorporation of Columbia Bancorp (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(i) to Columbias form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 1999.) | |
3.2 | Bylaws of Columbia Bancorp (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 15.5 to Columbias Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1998.) | |
4.1 | Indenture dated as of December 19, 2002 between Columbia Bancorp, as Issuer, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee, relating to Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Debt Securities due 2033.* | |
4.2 | Form of Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Debt Security due 2033.** | |
10.1+ | Employment Agreement of April 25, 2003 between Roger Christensen and Columbia Bancorp.* | |
10.2+ | Employment Agreement of April 15, 2003 between James McCall and Columbia River Bank.* | |
10.3+ | Employment Agreement of April 15, 2003 between Craig Ortega and Columbia River Bank.* | |
10.4+ | Employment Agreement of April 15, 2003 between Britt Thomas and Columbia River Bank.* | |
10.5+ | Deferred Compensation Agreement of April 1, 1999 between Terry L. Cochran and Columbia Bancorp. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Columbias Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999.) | |
10.6+ | Columbia Bancorp Restated Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust Agreement (1999 Restatement). (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Columbias Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999.) | |
10.7+ | Executive Salary Continuation Agreement between Columbia River Bank and Roger L. Christensen. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Columbias Periodic Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002.) | |
10.8+ | Executive Bonus Deferral Agreement between Columbia River Bank and Roger L. Christensen. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Columbias Periodic Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002.) | |
10.9+ | Split Dollar Agreement between Columbia River Bank and Roger L. Christensen. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Columbias Periodic Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 20, 2002.) | |
10.10+ | Phantom Stock Agreement between Columbia Bancorp and Roger L. Christensen. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Columbias Periodic Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002.) | |
10.11+ | Executive Salary Continuation Agreement between Columbia River Bank and James C. McCall. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Columbias Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002.) | |
10.12+ | Executive Bonus Deferral Agreement between Columbia River Bank and James C. McCall. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to Columbias Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002.) |
85
10.13+ | Split Dollar Agreement between Columbia River Bank and James C. McCall. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to Columbias Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002.) | |
10.14+ | Executive Salary Continuation Agreement between Columbia River Bank and Craig J. Ortega. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to Columbias Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002.) | |
10.15+ | Executive Bonus Deferral Agreement between Columbia River Bank and Craig J. Ortega. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Columbias Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002.) | |
10.16+ | Split Dollar Agreement between Columbia River Bank and Craig J. Ortega. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to Columbias Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002.) | |
10.17+ | Executive Salary Continuation Agreement between Columbia River Bank and Britt W. Thomas. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to Columbias Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002.) | |
10.18+ | Executive Bonus Deferral Agreement between Columbia River Bank and Britt W. Thomas. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to Columbias Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002.) | |
10.19+ | Split Dollar Agreement between Columbia River Bank and Britt W. Thomas. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to Columbias Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002.) | |
10.20+ | Executive Salary Continuation Agreement between Columbia River Bank and Greg B. Spear. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to Columbias Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002.) | |
10.21+ | Executive Bonus Deferral Agreement between Columbia River Bank and Greg B. Spear. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to Columbias Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002.) | |
10.22+ | Split Dollar Agreement between Columbia River Bank and Greg B. Spear. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to Columbias Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002.) | |
10.23+ | Employment Agreement between R. Shane Correa and Columbia River Bank dated May 15, 2003. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Columbias quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003.) | |
13.1 | Annual Report to Shareholders for the Year Ended December 31, 2003.* | |
21.1 | List of Subsidiaries.* | |
23.1 | Consent of Moss Adams, LLP.* | |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) and Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
86
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) and Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* | |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. 1350.* | |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. 1350.* |
+ Management contract, plan or arrangement.
*Included as an exhibit to Columbia Bancorps Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
**Incorporated by reference to Exhibit A as contained in Exhibit 4.1 of this Report.
(b) Reports filed on Form 8-K
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 23, 2003 containing Regulation FD disclosure relating to Columbias third quarter earnings release.
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 28, 2004 containing Regulation FD disclosure relating to Columbias fourth quarter and fiscal year earnings release.
87
SIGNATURES
In accordance with Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
COLUMBIA BANCORP
DATED: February 27, 2004 By: Roger L. Christensen, President & C.E.O - Columbia and CRB
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTOR
DATED: February 27, 2004 By: Roger L. Christensen, President & C.E.O - Columbia and CRB
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
DATED: February 27, 2004 By: Greg B. Spear, Chief Financial Officer and
Chief
Accounting Officer - Columbia and CRB
DIRECTORS:
DATED: February 27, 2004 By: Donald T. Mitchell, Director and Chairman
DATED: February 27, 2004 By: Robert L. R. Bailey, Director
DATED: February 27, 2004 By: Charles F. Beardsley, Director
DATED: February 27, 2004 By: Richard E. Betz, Director
DATED: February 27, 2004 By: William A. Booth, Director
DATED: February 27, 2004 By: Dennis L. Carver, Director
DATED: February 27, 2004 By: Terry, L. Cochran, Director
DATED: February 27, 2004 By: James J. Doran, Director
DATED: February 27, 2004 By: Jean S. McKinney, Director
88