ADVANCED ACCESSORY SYSTEMS LLC - 10-K Annual Report

Back to GetFilings.com

================================================================================

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

--------------

FORM 10-K

(MARK ONE)

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002

OR

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ____________ TO ____________

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 333-49011
---------

(ADVANCED ACCESSORY SYSTEMS, LLC LOGO)

ADVANCED ACCESSORY SYSTEMS, LLC
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)

DELAWARE 13-3848156
- ------------------------------------------------ -------------------
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION (I.R.S. EMPLOYER
OF INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION) IDENTIFICATION NO.)

12900 HALL ROAD, SUITE 200, STERLING HEIGHTS, MI 48313
- ------------------------------------------------ -------------------
(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES) (ZIP CODE)

REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: (586) 997-2900

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT: NONE

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT: NONE

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to
Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained,
to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer
(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [ ] No [X]

The aggregate market value of the registrant's Class A and A-1
Units held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2002 (the last
business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter),
based upon the good faith determination of the Board of Managers, was
approximately $8,946,000. For purposes of this disclosure, shares of Class A and
A-1 Units held by persons who hold more than 5% of the outstanding Class A and
A-1 Units and Class A and A-1 Units held by officers and managers of the
registrant have been excluded because such persons may be deemed to be
affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily conclusive
for other purposes.

The number of the registrant's Class A and A-1 Units, outstanding
at March 25, 2003 was 9,226 and 5,133, respectively.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None

================================================================================

ADVANCED ACCESSORY SYSTEMS, LLC

FORM 10-K
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

Item 1. BUSINESS ......................................................... 1

Item 2. PROPERTIES ....................................................... 10

Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS ................................................ 10

Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS .............. 11

PART II

Item 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED
MEMBER MATTERS ................................................... 11

Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA .......................................... 12

Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS .............................. 14

Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK ............................................................. 21

Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA ...................... 24

Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE .............................. 52

PART III

Item 10. MANAGERS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT ................ 52

Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION ........................................... 53

Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT ....................................................... 56

Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS ................... 58

Item 14. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES .......................................... 58

PART IV

Item 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON
FORM 8-K ......................................................... 59

SIGNATURES ................................................................ 62

i

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

THIS BUSINESS SECTION AND OTHER PARTS OF THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM
10-K CONTAIN FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS GENERALLY CAN BE IDENTIFIED BY THE USE OF TERMS SUCH
AS "MAY," "WILL," "SHOULD," "EXPECT," "ANTICIPATE," "BELIEVE," "INTEND," "PLAN,"
"ESTIMATE," "PREDICT," "POTENTIAL," "FORECAST," "CONTINUE" OR VARIATIONS OF SUCH
TERMS, OR THE USE OF THESE TERMS IN THE NEGATIVE. THE COMPANY'S ACTUAL RESULTS
MAY DIFFER SIGNIFICANTLY FROM THE RESULTS DISCUSSED IN THE FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS, AND SUCH DIFFERENCES MAY BE MATERIAL. FACTORS THAT MIGHT CAUSE SUCH
A DIFFERENCE INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, THOSE DISCUSSED BELOW, THOSE
DISCUSSED IN "MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS" AND THOSE SET FORTH UNDER THE CAPTION "RISK FACTORS"
BEGINNING ON PAGE 11 OF THE PROSPECTUS DATED APRIL 26, 2002 INCLUDED IN OUR
REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-4 (FILE NO. 333-49011).

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

GENERAL

Advanced Accessory Systems, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, the
"Company" or "AAS") is one of the world's largest suppliers of towing and rack
systems and related accessories for the automotive original equipment
manufacturer ("OEM") market and the automotive aftermarket. The Company's
products include a comprehensive line of towing systems and related accessories,
such as trailer balls, ball mounts, electrical harnesses, safety chains and
locking hitch pins. The Company's broad offering of rack systems includes fixed
and detachable racks and accessories, which can be installed on vehicles to
carry items such as bicycles, skis, luggage, surfboards and sailboards. The
Company's products are sold as standard accessories or options for a variety of
light vehicles. In 2002, the Company estimates that more than 65% of its net
sales were generated from products sold for light trucks. For the year ended
December 31, 2002, the Company's net sales and EBITDA were $329.8 million and
$41.9 million, respectively. AAS is a Delaware limited liability company that
was formed on August 28, 1995 and commenced business on September 28, 1995.

In September 1995, the Company, through its SportRack, LLC subsidiary
("SportRack"), acquired substantially all of the assets of the MascoTech
Accessories division (the "MascoTech Division") of MascoTech, Inc. ("MascoTech"
or the "Predecessor"). The MascoTech Division was a North American supplier of
rack systems and accessories to the automotive OEM market and aftermarket.

In October 1996, the Company acquired (the "Brink Acquisition") all of the
capital stock of Brink B.V., a private company with limited liability
incorporated under the laws of The Netherlands and a European supplier of towing
systems to the automotive OEM market and aftermarket. In December 1996,
ownership of Brink B.V. and its subsidiaries was transferred to a newly formed
subsidiary of the Company, Brink International B.V. ("Brink").

In August 1997, the Company formed Valley Industries, LLC ("Valley") to
acquire (the "Valley Acquisition") the assets of Valley Industries, Inc.
("Valley Industries"), a North American supplier of towing systems to the
automotive OEM market and aftermarket.

Two smaller acquisitions were completed in July 1997 by SportRack
Accessories, Inc. ("SportRack Accessories" formerly SportRack International,
Inc.), a subsidiary of SportRack. SportRack Accessories acquired from Bell
Sports Corporation ("Bell") the assets of its sportrack division, a Canadian
supplier of rack systems and accessories to the automotive aftermarket. An
affiliate of J.P. Morgan Partners, LLC ("JPMP") which is also an affiliate of
the Company, at that time was a significant equity investor in Bell. SportRack
Accessories also acquired the capital stock of Nomadic Sports, Inc. ("Nomadic"),
a Canadian supplier of rack systems and accessories to the automotive OEM market
and aftermarket. The acquisitions of the sportrack division of Bell and Nomadic
are collectively referred to in this Form 10-K as the "SportRack Accessories
Acquisition."

In January 1998, the Company, through Brink, acquired (the "Ellebi
Acquisition") the assets of the towbar segment of Ellebi S.p.A. ("Ellebi").
Ellebi is an Italian supplier of towing systems to the automotive OEM market and
aftermarket.

In February 1998, the Company, through SportRack Accessories, acquired (the
"Transfo-Rakzs Acquisition") the assets of Transfo-Rakzs, Inc.
("Transfo-Rakzs"). Transfo-Rakzs is a Canadian supplier of rear hitch rack
carrying systems and related products to the automotive aftermarket.

1

In February 2000, the Company, through Valley, acquired (the "Titan
Acquisition") the assets of Titan Industries, Inc. ("Titan"). Titan is a North
American supplier of trailer balls and other towing related accessories to the
automotive aftermarket.

In September 2000, the Company, through SportRack Accessories, acquired (the
"Barrecrafters Acquisition") the assets of the Wiswall Hill Corporation
("Wiswall Hill" or "Barrecrafters"). Wiswall Hill is a North American supplier
of rack systems and accessories to the automotive aftermarket under its popular
brand name, Barrecrafters.

As announced on March 14, 2003 the Company and Castle Harlan, Inc., a
private equity investment firm ("Castle Harlan"), are in the latter stages of
negotiations regarding the purchase of the Company by affiliates of Castle
Harlan. Consummation of the sale would be contingent upon satisfaction of
customary legal and business conditions, including, among other things, Castle
Harlan's obtaining sufficient third party debt financing to complete the
transaction. Any definitive transaction is expected to involve a redemption of
the Company's outstanding 9 3/4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2007 at the
current optional redemption price of 104 7/8% of principal amount, plus accrued
interest.

PRODUCTS

The principal product lines of the Company are towing systems, rack systems
and related accessories. In 2002, towing systems and towing accessories
constituted approximately 53% of the Company's net sales and rack systems and
rack accessories constituted approximately 47% of the Company's net sales. The
Company believes it offers a more comprehensive product line than most of its
competitors. The Company has devoted considerable resources to the engineering
and designing of its products and, as a result, considers itself a market leader
in the research and new product development of towing systems and rack systems.

Towing Systems. The Company designs, manufactures and supplies towing
systems to automotive OEMs and the automotive aftermarket which fit almost every
light vehicle used for towing in North America and Europe. In the aggregate, the
Company supplies over 2,000 different towing systems, as well as a line of
towing accessories.

The Company's towing systems sold in Europe are installed primarily on
passenger cars. In Europe, the Company sells both fixed ball towbars as well as
more sophisticated detachable ball systems. Fixed ball towbars are designed to
be permanently attached to a vehicle, while detachable ball systems are designed
so that the towing ball can be easily removed when not in use. The detachable
ball systems are becoming increasingly popular especially with owners of more
expensive cars and for cars on which the license plates would otherwise be
blocked by a fixed ball towbar. The Company's towing systems sold in Europe are
designed to satisfy European Community ("EC") regulatory standards and undergo
rigorous durability and safety testing in order to comply with these standards.

The Company's towing systems sold in North America are installed primarily
on light trucks. As new vehicles are introduced, the Company designs towing
systems to match the specific vehicle design. The Company has introduced many
innovative product designs such as the tubular trailer hitch which is lighter in
weight, less obtrusive and stronger than the conventional hitch. Many of the
Company's product innovations have enabled the Company to improve the
functionality and safety of towing systems while, at the same time, enhancing
the overall appearance of vehicles utilizing these towing products.

The Company also offers a line of towing accessories, including trailer
balls, ball mounts, electrical harnesses, safety chains and locking hitch pins.

Fixed Rack Systems. The Company supplies fixed roof rack systems for
individual vehicle models that are generally sold to the automotive OEMs for
installation at the factory or dealership. These rack systems are typically
installed on a model for the life of its design, which generally ranges from
four to six years. The Company has been an industry leader in developing designs
which not only complement the styling themes of a particular vehicle, but also
increase the utility and functionality of the rack system.

Most of the fixed rack systems sold by the Company are composed of side
rails which run along both sides of the vehicle's roof. In many cases, the rack
system includes cross rails, which are attached to the side rails with
stanchions, and are typically movable and can be used to carry a load. The
Company uses advanced materials such as lightweight, high strength plastics and
roll formed aluminum to develop durable rack systems that optimize vehicle
performance. Many of these products incorporate innovative features such as push
button and pull lever stanchions, which allow easy movement of the cross rails
to accommodate various size loads. These rack systems are utilized on a large
number of light trucks, including Jeep Grand Cherokee and Liberty,
DaimlerChrysler minivans, Dodge Durango, Chevrolet Suburban, Tahoe and
Trailblazer, GMC Yukon and Envoy, Cadillac Escalade, Oldsmobile Bravada, Hummer
H2, Mercedes Benz M-Class and BMW X5.

2

Detachable Rack Systems. The Company supplies a full line of detachable roof
rack systems for distribution in both the automotive and sporting accessory
aftermarkets. A detachable rack system typically consists of cross rails which
are attached to the roof of a vehicle by removable mounting clips.

Rack System Accessories. The Company designs and manufactures lifestyle
accessories for distribution in both the automotive and sporting accessory
aftermarkets. These accessories typically attach to the Company's towing systems
or rack systems and are used for carrying items such as bicycles, skis, luggage,
surfboards and sailboards.

CUSTOMERS AND MARKETING

Management believes that the Company has strong and diverse industry
relationships which are based on its reputation for high service levels, strong
technical support, innovative product development, high quality and competitive
pricing. Sales to OEM and aftermarket customers represented approximately 68%
and 32% of the Company's net sales, respectively, in 2002. In addition, sales to
DaimlerChrysler and General Motors were approximately 23% and 22%, respectively,
of the Company's aggregate net sales in 2002.

Automotive OEMs. The Company obtains most of its new orders through a
sourcing process by which the customer invites a few preferred suppliers to
design and manufacture a component or system that meets certain price, timing,
functional and aesthetic parameters. Upon selection at the development stage,
the Company and the customer typically agree to cooperate in developing the
product to meet the specified parameters. Upon completion of the development
stage and the award of the manufacturing business, the Company receives a
purchase order that covers parts to be supplied for a particular car model. Such
supply arrangements typically involve annual renewals of the purchase order over
the life of the model, which is generally four to six years. In addition, the
Company enters into long-term contracts with certain OEM customers which require
the Company to make annual price reductions. The Company competes to supply
parts for successor models even though the Company may currently supply parts on
the predecessor model. Sales to OEMs are made directly by the Company's internal
sales staff and outside sales representatives.

The Company sells its products to most of the automotive OEMs selling light
vehicles in North America and/or Europe, including DaimlerChrysler, General
Motors, Toyota, Opel, Volvo, Isuzu, Ford, BMW, Subaru, Fiat, Mitsubishi, Nissan,
Volkswagen, SEAT, Skoda, Daewoo and Kia. The following chart sets forth
information regarding vehicle models on which the Company's products are used or
for which the Company has been awarded business.

- ----------

(a) Represents models for which the Company produced products in 2002.

(b) The amount of products produced under these awards is dependent on the
number of vehicles manufactured by the OEMs. Many of the models are versions
of vehicles not yet in production. There can be no assurance that any of
these vehicles will be produced or that the Company will generate certain
revenues under these awards even if the models are produced.

4

Automotive Aftermarket. The Company sells its products directly into the
automotive aftermarket through a number of channels, including wholesalers,
retailers and installers, through its internal sales force and outside sales
representatives. The largest of the Company's aftermarket customers include
U-Haul, Balkamp, Advance Auto Parts, Coast Distribution System, Discount Auto
Parts, Ace Hardware, Norauto, Brezan, Feuvert and Canadian Tire. The Company
believes that it has established a reputation as a highly reliable aftermarket
supplier able to meet its customers' requirements for on-time deliveries while
minimizing the carrying levels of inventory.

The Company's sales in the automotive aftermarket are seasonal. Historically
the highest sales have been in the second quarter of each year and the second
highest sales have been in the first quarter of each year.

PRODUCT DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING

The Company believes that it is a leader in the design of towing systems and
rack systems and accessories. The Company believes it offers products that
possess greater quality, reliability and performance than the products sold by
many of its competitors. The approximately 135 members of the Company's
engineering and design staff possess strong technical skills. The Company
currently holds more than 150 U.S. and foreign patents, and has several patent
applications pending. The expiration of such patents are not expected to have a
material adverse effect on the Company's operations.

The Company spent $8.5 million, $9.4 million and $9.8 million on
engineering, research and development in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The
Company works closely with OEMs to improve design and manufacturing technology
and product functionality. When an OEM is in the process of developing a new
model, it typically approaches an established or incumbent supplier with a
request to supply the required towing system or rack system. The Company is
typically contacted two to four years prior to the start of production of the
new model. The Company's product development engineers then work closely with
the OEM to develop a product that satisfies the OEM's aesthetic and functional
requirements. This relationship also provides the Company with a competitive
advantage in the aftermarket because, in many cases, the Company already
possesses the knowledge to create a system compatible with new model vehicles
prior to release.

The Company has extensive testing capabilities which enable it to test and
certify its products. The Company subjects its products to tests which it
believes are more demanding than conditions which would occur during normal use.
The Company has specialized equipment which it has purchased or developed for
use in its testing laboratories.

Since May 1994, 15 European countries enacted the new EC regulatory
standards which require that towing systems undergo significant safety testing
prior to gaining approval for sale. This safety testing requires that a towing
system be extensively tested for fatigue and includes subjecting a towing system
to upwards of two million high load pulses. The Company does its testing in its
own laboratory under the control of an independent institute that is authorized
by the EC to approve the towing systems for sale. The quality assurance system
is regularly audited by an independent institute and by the automotive OEMs
themselves. The Company has always been awarded the highest distinction of
achievement by the independent institute.

MANUFACTURING PROCESS

The Company's manufacturing operations are directed toward achieving ongoing
quality improvements, reducing manufacturing and overhead costs, realizing
efficiencies and adding flexibility. The Company has organized its production
process to minimize the number of manufacturing functions and the frequency of
material handling, thereby improving quality and reducing costs. In addition,
the Company uses cellular manufacturing which improves scheduling flexibility,
productivity and quality while reducing work in process and costs.

The manufacturing operations utilized by the Company include metal cutting,
bending, cold forming, roll forming, stamping, welding, plastic injection
molding, painting, assembly and packaging. The Company performs most
manufacturing operations in-house but outsources certain processes depending on
the capabilities and capacities of individual plants and cost considerations.
For example, while some of the Company's towing systems manufacturing facilities
have painting capabilities, the Company has chosen to outsource the painting of
its rack systems.

The Company has established quality procedures at each of its facilities and
strives to manufacture the highest quality product possible. The Company has
achieved ISO-9000 or QS-9000 certification for 17 of its 23 manufacturing and
engineering facilities and is in the process of obtaining certification for
other of its facilities. The Company has received numerous quality and
performance awards from its OEM customers, including DaimlerChrysler's Gold
Award, General Motors's Supplier of the Year Award, Ford's Q-1

5

Award, Toyota's Distinguished Supplier Award, KIA's Preferred Supplier Award and
the Nissan Superior Supplier Performance Award.

RAW MATERIALS

The principal raw material used in the Company's products is steel, which is
purchased in sheets, rolls, bars or tubes and represents approximately 25% of
the Company's raw material costs. The Company also purchases significant amounts
of aluminum and plastics. The Company has various suppliers globally and has not
had difficulties in procuring raw materials nor does it expect to have any
problems in the future. The Company is committed to supplier development and
long-term supplier relationships. However, most of the Company's raw material
demands are for commodities and, as such, can be purchased on the open market on
an as needed basis. The Company selects among available suppliers by comparing
cost, consistent quality and timely delivery as well as compliance with QS-9000
and ISO-9000 standards.

The Company customarily obtains its supplies through individual purchase
orders. In some instances, the Company will enter into short-term contracts with
its suppliers which generally run one year or less. However, the Company has
signed a long-term supply agreement which terminates in 2004 with one of its
painting suppliers, Crown Group, Inc. ("Crown"), under which Crown opened a
state-of-the-art paint line in a facility adjacent to the Company's Port Huron,
Michigan facility.

AUTOMOTIVE OEM AND AFTERMARKET TRENDS

As automobile and light truck manufacturers have faced increased global
competition, they have sought to significantly improve quality, reduce costs and
shorten the development time required for new vehicle models. These changes have
altered the OEM/supplier relationship and benefited larger suppliers that have
strong product engineering and development capabilities, superior quality
products, lower unit costs and the ability to deliver products on a timely
basis. Following are some of the significant trends impacting the automotive OEM
market and automotive aftermarket.

Consolidation of Supplier Base by OEMs. The OEMs have significantly
consolidated their supplier base in an effort to reduce their
procurement-related costs, ensure high quality and accelerate new model
development. As a result, many smaller, poorly capitalized suppliers with
limited product lines and engineering and design capabilities have been
eliminated as direct suppliers to OEMs. Consequently, larger suppliers with
broad product lines, in-house design and engineering capabilities and the
ability to effectively manage their own supplier bases, have been able to
significantly increase their market share.

The consolidation by OEMs has altered the typical structure of supplier
contracts. In the past, OEMs supplied all design, development and manufacturing
expertise for accessory parts and were responsible for consistency of quality
and reliability of delivery. Today, however, the OEMs typically involve
potential suppliers earlier in the design and development process to encourage
suppliers to share design and development responsibility. In some cases,
sole-source supply contracts, which cover the life of a vehicle or platform, are
awarded. Both OEMs and suppliers benefit from the consolidation trend. Suppliers
are able to devote the resources necessary for proprietary product development
with the expectation that they will have the opportunity to profit on such
investment over the multi-year life of a contract. OEMs benefit from shared
manufacturing cost savings attributable to long, multi-year production runs at
high capacity utilization levels.

Pricing pressures. As a result of increased global competition, excess
capacity and recent recessionary trends, many automotive OEMs have increased the
pressures on suppliers to reduce selling prices. This pricing pressure in
conjunction with the need to increase investment in product engineering and
development capabilities has reduced the profitability of many tier one
automotive suppliers. The Company works closely with its customers to find ways
to reduce selling prices through design and engineering changes or to minimize
the impact of price reductions through internal cost reductions and
manufacturing efficiency gains. The Company believes that its design and
engineering capabilities and manufacturing expertise may allow it to offset much
of the mandated price reductions, while allowing the Company to increase
business as customers look to reduce costs.

Emergence of European Community Regulatory Standards. Trends within the
European towing systems market result primarily from EC regulatory standards and
the corresponding legislative framework. Such standards provide that a towing
system must fit all the vehicle manufacturer's recommended fitting points, must
not interfere with the vision of the number plate when not in use and must meet
strict testing criteria for durability and safety. These standards have been
adopted by The Netherlands, Germany, Sweden, Italy, the United Kingdom, France,
Belgium, Luxembourg, Spain, Austria, Greece, Finland, Denmark, Ireland and
Portugal. Other EC countries are expected to adopt the legislation. All of the
Company's towing systems sold in Europe are designed and tested to satisfy these
EC regulatory standards.

6

Increased Levels of Manufacturing in North America by Transplants. Foreign
automobile manufacturers with manufacturing operations in the United States
("transplants") have increased their share of North American light vehicle
production from approximately 6% in 1986 to approximately 21% in 2002. Industry
sources forecast that this trend will continue. For example, BMW commenced
manufacturing in the U.S. in 1996 and launched production of its E-53 SUV in
1999. Toyota launched production of its Tundra pickup truck in Indiana during
1999 and launched production of its Sequoia SUV during 2000, and Honda began
production of its Odyssey minivan in North America during 1999 and began
production of its Acura MD SUV during 2000. During 2002, Nissan announced plans
to begin production of its Pathfinder, Frontier and XTerra models in a new
facility to be constructed in Canton, Mississippi and Hyundai announced its
intention to begin production of a new SUV in Alabama. The Company believes that
increased levels of manufacturing of light trucks in North America by
transplants will benefit full service, high quality suppliers with North
American operations such as the Company.

COMPETITION

The Company's industry is highly competitive. Although, the Company is one
of the world's largest suppliers of towing and rack systems, a large number of
actual or potential competitors exist, some of which are larger than the Company
and have substantially greater resources than the Company. The Company competes
primarily on the basis of product quality, cost, timely delivery, customer
service, engineering and design capabilities and new product innovation in both
the OEM market and the automotive aftermarket. The Company believes that as OEMs
continue to strive to reduce new model development cost and time, innovation and
design and engineering capabilities will become more important as a basis for
distinguishing competitors. The Company believes it has an outstanding
reputation in these areas. In the automotive aftermarket, the Company believes
that its wide range of product applications is a competitive advantage. For
example, the Company has developed towing systems to fit almost every light
vehicle used for towing in North America and Europe. The Company believes its
competitive advantage in the aftermarket is enhanced by its close relationships
with OEMs, allowing the Company access to automobile design at an earlier time
than its competitors.

In the towing systems market, the Company competes with Cequent, a division
of TriMas Corporation, Bosal Holding B.V., The Oris Group, Production Stamping
Inc. and numerous smaller competitors.

In the rack systems and accessories market, the Company's competitors
include JAC Holding Corp., Thule International S.A., Yakima Products, Inc.,
Graber Products Inc. and several smaller competitors.

COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES

Leading Global Market Position. Based on its knowledge of the industry, the
Company believes that it is one of the world's largest suppliers of towing
systems and one of the world's largest suppliers of rack systems. The Company
also believes, based on its knowledge of the industry, that it is the largest
supplier of towing systems in Europe and the second largest supplier of towing
systems in North America. The Company also believes that it is one of the two
largest suppliers of rack systems sold to automotive OEMs in North America. The
Company has 28 facilities strategically located in North America and Europe. By
virtue of its size and global presence, the Company believes it benefits from
several competitive advantages, including the ability to (i) satisfy local
design, production, quality and timing requirements of global OEMs; (ii) provide
"one-stop shopping" for customers' product and service requirements; (iii)
optimize plant production; (iv) maximize its raw material purchasing power; (v)
spread its selling, administrative and product development expenses over a large
base of net sales; and (vi) develop and maintain modern production facilities.

Strong Relationships with Diverse Customer Base. The Company has an
established position as a Tier 1 supplier of towing and/or rack systems to most
of the OEMs manufacturing in North America and/or Europe including
DaimlerChrysler, General Motors, Toyota, Opel, Volvo, Isuzu, Ford, BMW, Subaru,
Fiat, Mitsubishi, Nissan, Volkswagen, SEAT, Skoda, Daewoo and Kia. Tier 1 status
and strong customer relationships are important elements in achieving continued
profitable growth because, as OEMs narrow their supplier bases, well regarded,
existing suppliers have an advantage in gaining new contracts. The evolution of
OEM relationships into strategic partnerships provides a significant advantage
to Tier 1 suppliers with system integration capabilities (such as the Company)
in retaining existing contracts as well as in participating during the design
phase for new vehicles, which is integral to becoming a supplier for such new
platforms. The Company is also a leading supplier of towing and rack systems to
automotive aftermarket wholesalers, retailers and installers, such as U-Haul,
Balkamp, Advance Auto Parts, Coast Distribution System, Discount Auto Parts, Ace
Hardware, Norauto, Brezan, Feuvert and Canadian Tire.

Comprehensive Product Line. The Company continues to position itself as a
leading supplier to its customers for a growing range of products and services.
Through its offering of over 2,000 towing system models, the Company's products
fit almost every light vehicle used for towing in North America and Europe. The
Company is one of a limited number of European manufacturers with

7

such a broad product line that also satisfies EC regulatory standards.
Competitors whose products do not satisfy such standards face substantial design
and testing costs to offer a comparable product line that meets these safety
standards. The Company has provided OEMs with fixed rack systems for
approximately half of the light truck models produced in North America that
utilize vehicle-specific fixed racks. The Company believes that its broad
product offerings also facilitate strategic partnerships with automotive
aftermarket wholesalers, retailers and installers.

Design and Engineering Expertise. The Company has an engineering and
research and development staff that develops new products and processing
technologies. The Company works directly with OEM designers to create innovative
solutions that simplify vehicle assembly and reduce vehicle cost and weight. The
Company is responsible for many industry innovations, including lighter, less
obtrusive, round tube towing hitches as well as push button and pull lever
stanchions on fixed rack systems. The Company believes its design and
engineering capabilities provide significant value to its customers by (i)
shortening OEM new product development cycles; (ii) lowering OEM manufacturing
costs; (iii) providing technical expertise; and (iv) permitting aftermarket
customers to maintain lower inventory levels. The Company also believes that its
design innovations have created value for end users by providing products that
are durable and easy to install and that enhance vehicle utility and appearance.

High Quality, Low Cost Manufacturing Position. The Company believes that it
is one of the highest quality, lowest cost suppliers of towing and rack systems
in North America and Europe. The Company has received numerous quality and
performance awards, including DaimlerChrysler's Gold Award, General Motor's
Supplier of the Year Award, Ford's Q-1 Award, Toyota's Distinguished Supplier
Award, Kia's Preferred Supplier Award and Nissan's Superior Supplier Performance
Award. Supplier quality systems are currently being standardized across OEMs
through the ISO-9000 and QS-9000 programs. The Company has achieved ISO-9000 or
QS-9000 certification for 17 of its 23 manufacturing and engineering facilities
and is in the process of obtaining certification for other of its facilities.
The Company's low cost position is a result of its strict cost controls and
continuous improvement programs designed to enhance productivity. OEMs typically
prefer stable suppliers who can generate productivity gains that can be shared
to reduce OEM costs. The Company's cost controls are closely integrated with its
quality driven manufacturing operations, thereby allowing it to profitably
deliver high quality, easy to install and competitively-priced components on a
just-in-time basis. The Company's focus on low cost manufacturing also provides
benefits when selling products to the automotive aftermarket.

BUSINESS STRATEGY

The Company's objective is to strengthen its position as a leading global
supplier of automotive exterior accessories, thereby increasing revenue and cash
flow. In order to accomplish its goal, the Company intends to pursue the
following strategies.

Increase Global Market Share. The Company intends to capitalize on its
expanded presence in North America and Europe by marketing products to its
global automotive OEM customers. Through its past acquisitions of complementary
product lines, the Company is able to offer an expanded range of products and
services to its extended customer base. The Company also expects to secure new
customers by virtue of its expanded market presence and broad product and
service offerings. The Company believes its continued emphasis on new technology
(both product and process), will result in the development of innovative, towing
and rack system products which it expects to market to its expanding customer
base.

Maintain and Enhance Strong Customer Relationships. The Company intends to
strengthen and expand its relationships with global automotive OEMs and
aftermarket customers by (i) continuing its commitment to innovative design and
development of products during the early stages of vehicle design and redesign;
(ii) building on its position as a low cost supplier of quality accessory
products; (iii) offering new products in existing and new geographic areas by
taking advantage of existing OEM relationships; and (iv) working with
aftermarket customers to develop new products and marketing strategies.

Pursue Strategic Acquisitions. In response to the trend in the OEM market
toward systems suppliers, the Company is focused on making strategic
acquisitions that will enhance its ability to provide integrated systems (such
as a towing or rack system) or otherwise leverage its existing business by
providing additional product, manufacturing and service capabilities. The
Company also intends to pursue acquisitions which will expand its customer base
by providing an entree to new customers, including expansion into selected
geographic areas. The Company believes that such acquisitions should provide
additional opportunities for increased net sales and cash flow by enhancing the
Company's manufacturing and marketing capabilities.

ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION

The Company's operations are subject to foreign, state and local
environmental laws and regulations that limit the discharges into the
environment and establish standards for the handling, generation, emission,
release, discharge, treatment, storage, and disposal of

8

certain materials, substances and wastes. In many jurisdictions, these laws are
complex, change frequently and have tended to become stronger over time.

In jurisdictions such as the United States, such obligations, including but
not limited to those under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation & Liability Act ("CERCLA"), may be joint and several and may apply
to conditions at properties presently or formerly owned or operated by an entity
or its predecessors, as well as to conditions at properties at which waste or
other contamination attributable to an entity or its predecessors have been sent
or otherwise come to be located. The Company believes that its operations are in
substantial compliance with the terms of all applicable environmental laws and
regulations as currently interpreted. In addition, to the best of the Company's
knowledge, there are no existing or potential environmental claims against the
Company nor has the Company received any notification nor is there any current
investigation regarding, the disposal, release, or threatened release at any
location of any hazardous substance generated or transported by the Company.
However, the Company cannot predict with any certainty that it will not in the
future incur liability under environmental laws and regulations with respect to
contamination of sites currently or formerly owned or operated by the Company
(including contamination caused by prior owners and operators of such sites), or
the off-site disposal of hazardous substances.

While historically the Company has not had to make significant capital
expenditures for environmental compliance, the Company cannot predict with any
certainty its future capital expenditures for environmental compliance because
of continually changing compliance standards and technology. Future events, such
as changes in existing environmental laws and regulations or unknown
contamination of sites owned or operated by the Company (including contamination
caused by prior owners and operators of such sites), may give rise to additional
compliance costs which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's
financial condition. Furthermore, actions by foreign, federal, state and local
governments concerning environmental matters could result in laws or regulations
that could increase the cost of producing the products manufactured by the
Company or otherwise adversely affect the demand for its products. Additionally,
the Company does not currently have any insurance coverage for environmental
liabilities and does not anticipate obtaining such coverage in the future.

EMPLOYEES

At December 31, 2002, the Company had approximately 2,300 employees of whom
approximately 1,780 are hourly employees and approximately 520 are salaried
personnel. Approximately 170 of the Company's employees in the United States at
the Port Huron, Michigan facility are represented by the Teamsters Union.
Collective bargaining agreements with the Teamsters Union affecting these
employees expire in April 2004. As is common in many European jurisdictions,
substantially all of the Company's employees in Europe are covered by
country-wide collective bargaining agreements. The Company believes that its
relations with its employees are good.

FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC OPERATIONS

For financial information about foreign and domestic operations of the
Company and net sales by product line, see "Note 12" of the Company's "Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements" included in Item 8 of this report.

9

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

The Company's executive offices are located in 14,550 square feet of leased
space in Sterling Heights, Michigan. The Company has 28 facilities with a total
of 2,197,678 square feet of space. The Company believes that substantially all
of its property and equipment is suitable for its needs and in good condition
and that it has sufficient capacity to meet its current and projected
manufacturing and distribution needs.

The Company's facilities are as follows:

- ----------

* QS 9000 and/or ISO 9000 certification.

** Gives effect to all renewal options.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Gibbs v. Advanced Accessory Systems, LLC. In February 1996, the Company
commenced an action against two former employees alleging breach of contract
under the terms of an October 1992 Purchase Agreement and Employment Agreements
with the Predecessor of the Company. The individuals then filed a separate
lawsuit against the Company alleging breach of contract under the respective
Purchase and Employment agreements. On May 7, 1999 a jury in the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan reached a verdict against
the Company and awarded the individuals approximately $3.8 million plus interest
and reasonable attorney fees. The Company is currently pursuing an appeal in the
Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. During 2002, the Company increased its estimated
accrual for this matter by $600,000 which charge is included in interest
expense. No amounts have been paid as of December 31, 2002.

In addition to the above, from time to time, the Company is subject to legal
proceedings and other claims arising in the ordinary course of its business.
Management believes that the resolution of these matters will not have a
material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows. The Company maintains insurance coverage against
claims in an amount which it believes to be adequate.

10

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED MEMBER MATTERS

There is no established public trading market for the Company's Class A or
Class A-1 Units. At March 25, 2003, there were 19 holders of record of Class A
Units and one holder of record of Class A-1 Units. Except as set forth below
with respect to quarterly tax distributions to Members, the Company has never
declared or paid dividends (or made any other distributions) on the Class A
Units or the Class A-1 Units and does not anticipate doing so in the foreseeable
future. Under certain loan agreements, the Company is prohibited from declaring
or paying any cash dividend or making distributions thereon, except for
quarterly distributions to Members to the extent of any tax liability with
respect to the Class A Units and Class A-1 Units and except for repurchases of
Class A Units from employees upon a termination of their employment with the
Company pursuant to an Employment Agreement and the Operating Agreement.

Class A Units are convertible into Class A-1 Units by holders that are
regulated financial institutions. Class A-1 Units are convertible into Class A
Units provided such conversion is not in violation of certain governmental
regulations of the unit holder.

As listed below, since January 1, 2000, the Company has issued unregistered
securities to investors. Each such issuance was made in reliance upon the
exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, contained in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act on the basis that such
transactions did not involve a public offering.

1) On January 1, 2000, the Company issued 3,655 of its Class A-1 Units to
J.P. Morgan Partners (23A SBIC), LLC in exchange for 3,655 Class A
Units.

2) On November 11, 2000 the Company issued 1,478 of its Class A-1 Units to
J.P. Morgan Partners (23A SBIC), LLC in exchange for 1,478 Class A
Units.

11

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The information below presents consolidated financial data of the Company
and includes (i) the operations of Ellebi subsequent to the Ellebi Acquisition
on January 2, 1998, (ii) the operations of Transfo-Rakzs subsequent to the
Transfo-Rakzs Acquisition on February 7, 1998, (iii) the operations of Titan
subsequent to the Titan Acquisition on February 22, 2000 and (iv) the operations
of Barrecrafters subsequent to the Barrecrafters Acquisition on September 5,
2000, and have been derived from the audited financial statements of the
Company. The following table should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements of the Company and notes thereto, and "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations"
included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

12

- ----------

1) The Company acquired the towbar segment of Ellebi S.p.A. on January 2, 1998
and the assets of Transfo-Rakzs on February 7, 1998. The Ellebi Acquisition
and Transfo-Rakzs Acquisition have been accounted for in accordance with the
purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, the operating results of Ellebi
and Transfo-Rakzs are included in the consolidated operating results of the
Company subsequent to the respective acquisition dates.

2) The Company acquired the assets of Titan Industries, Inc. on February 22,
2000 and the assets of Barrecrafters on September 5, 2000. The Titan
Acquisition and Barrecrafters Acquisition have been accounted for in
accordance with the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, the
operating results of Titan and Barrecrafters are included in the
consolidated operating results of the Company subsequent to the respective
acquisition dates.

3) In June 1998, information became available that indicated that certain
assets acquired from Bell (accounts receivable, inventory and tooling) had a
fair value less than originally recorded. The SportRack Accessories purchase
was renegotiated and a $2.0 million reimbursement was received from Bell.
Accounts receivable, inventory and tooling were reduced by $6.5 million and
additional goodwill of $4.5 million, net of the $2.0 million reimbursement
from Bell, was recorded. During the second half of 1998, management further
reassessed the operations of SportRack Accessories, took actions to
restructure the operations, and recorded restructuring charges totaling $1.9
million. Restructuring charges have been included in cost of sales ($1.1
million) and in selling, administrative and product development expenses
($832,000) in the Company's consolidated statement of operations. All
restructuring costs have been incurred as of December 31, 1998. Concurrent
with the reassessment of the SportRack Accessories operations, management
reviewed the carrying value of goodwill and other intangible assets,
determined that future cash flows would not be sufficient to recover
recorded amounts, and recorded an impairment charge of $7.9 million.

4) Primarily represents net currency gains and loss on indebtedness of the
Company's foreign subsidiaries denominated in currencies other than their
functional currency.

5) On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted the accounting standards set forth
in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, "Goodwill and other
Intangible Assets" ("SFAS 142") and Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets" ("SFAS 144"). SFAS 142 changed the methodology for assessing
goodwill impairments. The initial application of this statement resulted in
an impairment of goodwill of $29.2 million to write down goodwill related to
the Valley Industries Acquisition. The impairment was due solely to the
change in accounting standards and was reported as a cumulative effect of
accounting change. Under the new standard, impairment is determined by
comparing the carrying values of reporting units to the corresponding fair
values, which are determined based on the discounted estimated future cash
flows of the reporting units. As the impairment related to Valley
Industries, LLC for which taxable income accrues to the individual members,
no tax effect was recorded for this charge. Additionally, under the new
standard, goodwill is no longer amortized but is to be tested periodically
for impairment. The effect of no longer amortizing goodwill resulted in a
reduction of $3.0 million in amortization of intangible assets during 2002
as compared with each of 2001 and 2000. The adoption of SFAS 144 did not
have a material impact on the Company's financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.

6) The Company is a limited liability company and, as such, the earnings of the
Company and its domestic subsidiaries, except for AAS Holdings, Inc. (a
holding company for Brink) which is a C corporation, are included in the
taxable income of the Company's unitholders and no federal income tax
provision is required. The Company's foreign and taxable domestic
subsidiaries provide for income taxes on their results of operations.

7) EBITDA is defined as operating income plus depreciation and amortization
adjusted in 1998 for the non-cash portion of impairment and restructuring
charges ($9.5 million for the year ended December 31, 1998), which
definition may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by
other companies. EBITDA is presented because it is generally accepted as
providing useful information regarding a company's ability to service and/or
incur indebtedness. However, EBITDA should not be considered in isolation
from or as an alternative to net income, cash flows from operating
activities and other consolidated income or cash flow statement data
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles or as a
measure of profitability or liquidity. In addition, funds depicted by the
EBITDA measurement are not fully available for discretionary use because of
debt service requirements, expenditures for capital replacement and
expansion, and the need to conserve funds for other commitments and
uncertainties.

8) For purposes of determining the ratio of earnings to fixed charges,
"earnings" are defined as income (loss) before minority interest,
extraordinary charge and income taxes, plus fixed charges. "Fixed charges"
consist of interest expense on all indebtedness (including amortization of
deferred debt issuance costs) and the component of operating lease rental
expense that management believes is representative of the interest component
of rent expense.

13

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion of the results of operations and financial
condition of the Company should be read in conjunction with the financial
statements and notes thereto of the Company included elsewhere in this Form
10-K. This Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements. Discussions containing
such forward-looking statements may be found in the material set forth above, in
the material set forth below, in the material set forth in Item 1. "Business,"
as well as in this Form 10-K generally. These may include statements projecting,
forecasting or estimating Company performance and industry trends. General risks
that may impact the achievement of such forecasts include, but are not limited
to, compliance with new laws and regulations, general economic conditions in the
markets in which the Company operates, fluctuation in demand for the Company's
products and in the production of vehicles for which the Company is a supplier,
significant raw material price fluctuations, labor disputes involving the
Company or its significant customers or suppliers, changes in consumer
preferences, dependence on significant automotive customers, the level of
competition in the automotive supply industry, pricing pressure from automotive
customers, the substantial leverage of the Company, limitations imposed by the
Company's debt facilities, changes in the popularity of particular vehicle
models or towing and rack systems, the loss of programs on particular vehicle
models, risks associated with conducting business in foreign countries and other
business factors. Any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of
future performance and involve risks and uncertainties. Actual events or results
may differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements.
All of these forward looking statements are based on estimates and assumptions
made by management of the Company which, although believed to be reasonable, are
inherently uncertain. The Company does not intend to update these
forward-looking statements.

GENERAL

An affiliate of JPMP and certain members of the Company's management formed
the Company in September 1995 to make strategic acquisitions of automotive
exterior accessory manufacturers and to integrate those acquisitions into a
global enterprise that would be a preferred supplier to the automotive industry.

On March 14, 2003 the Company and Castle Harlan jointly announced that they
are in the latter stages of negotiations regarding the purchase of the Company
by affiliates of Castle Harlan. Consummation of the sale would be contingent
upon satisfaction of customary legal and business conditions, including, among
other things, Castle Harlan's obtaining sufficient third party debt financing to
complete the transaction. Any definitive transaction is expected to involve a
redemption of the Company's outstanding 9 3/4% Senior Subordinated Notes due
2007 at the current optional redemption price of 104 7/8% of principal amount,
plus accrued interest.

RECENT ACQUISITIONS

In February 2000, the Company through Valley, acquired the assets of Titan
Industries, Inc. ("Titan"). Titan is a North American Supplier of trailer balls
and other towing related accessories to the automotive aftermarket.

In September 2000, the Company through SportRack Accessories, acquired the
assets of the Wiswall Hill Corporation ("Wiswall Hill" or "Barrecrafters").
Wiswall Hill is a North American supplier of rack systems and accessories to the
automotive aftermarket under its popular brand name, Barrecrafters.

14

SUMMARY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table presents the major components of the statement of
operations together with percentages of each component as a percentage of net
sales.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

2002 COMPARED TO 2001

Net sales. Net sales for 2002 were $329.8 million, representing an
increase of $15.7 million, or 5.0%, compared with net sales for 2001. This
increase resulted primarily from increased sales to automotive OEMs of
approximately $12.9 million primarily resulting from increased production levels
of vehicles in North America compared to the prior year. Additionally, sales
were higher by $4.0 million due to an increase in average exchange rates for the
period between the U.S. Dollar and the currencies, primarily the European Euro,
used by the Company's foreign subsidiaries. Partially offsetting these increases
was a decline in aftermarket sales of approximately $1.2 million.

Gross profit. Gross profit for 2002 was $79.3 million, representing an
increase of $4.8 million, or 6.5%, from the gross profit for 2001. This increase
resulted from the increase in sales and an increase in the gross margin
percentage. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales was 24.0% in 2002 compared
to 23.7% in 2001. The increase in the gross margin percentage is primarily
attributable to the effects of spreading fixed costs over a higher sales base
and increased gross margin for North American towing products resulting from
increased productivity and cost cutting efforts. These increases were partially
offset by reduced gross margin resulting from a change in the mix of products
sold being weighted more towards lower margin products and lower production
efficiency at Brink which restructured its Netherlands manufacturing facilities
during the first quarter of 2002.

Selling, administrative and product development expenses. Selling,
administrative and product development expenses for 2002 were $49.3 million,
representing an increase of $4.5 million, or 10.1%, from the selling,
administrative and product development expenses for 2001. This increase was
primarily the result of a $3.0 million expense recorded for the recall of the G
3.0 model removable towbar system at Brink and unexecuted transaction costs of
$1.2 million. In early July 2002, three European automotive OEM customers of
Brink Sweden recalled in total approximately 41,000 towbars, which were supplied
by the Company. The recall affects vehicles fitted with the G 3.0 model
removable towbar system sold between January 1999 and March 2000. During the
fourth quarter of 2002, based upon information gathered concerning the costs of
the recall and from discussions with its customers management estimated and
recorded an expense of approximately $3.0 million for the recall. The unexecuted
transaction expenses are associated with the negotiations with Castle Harlan to
purchase the Company. Without the effects of the recall and unexecuted
transaction expenses, selling, administrative and product development expenses
would have been $45.1 million representing an increase of $310,000. Also before
the effects of the recall and unexecuted transaction costs, selling,
administrative and product development expenses as a percentage of net sales was
13.7% compared with 14.3% for 2001. This decrease is primarily attributable to
the effect of covering fixed costs with greater sales, the Company's ongoing
cost containment initiatives and the lack in 2002 of costs incurred to relocate
a warehouse operation during the first quarter of 2001.

Amortization of intangible assets. Amortization of intangible assets
for 2002 was $122,000, representing a decrease of $3.2 million compared with
amortization of intangible assets, which included amortization of goodwill, for
2001. This decrease was the result of a new accounting standard adopted on
January 1, 2002, which ceased the amortization of goodwill as of that date. See
"New Accounting Pronouncements".

15

Operating income. Operating income for 2002 was $29.8 million, an
increase of $3.5 million, or 13.1%, over operating income for 2001, reflecting
the increase in gross profit and the decrease in amortization of intangible
assets partially offset by the increase in selling, administrative and product
development expenses. Operating income as a percentage of net sales increased to
9.0% in 2002 from 8.4% in 2001.

Interest expense. Interest expense for 2002 was $15.9 million, which
was $1.8 million lower than interest expense for 2001. The decrease was due to
lower average interest rates charged on the Company's variable rate indebtedness
and reduced average borrowings.

Foreign currency (gain) loss. Foreign currency gain in 2002 was $8.4
million, compared to a foreign currency loss of $4.9 million in 2001. The
Company's foreign currency gain is primarily related to Brink which has
indebtedness denominated in U.S. Dollars, including intercompany debt and a
portion of the loans under the Company's Second Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement. During 2002 the U.S. Dollar weakened significantly in relation to the
European Euro, the functional currency of Brink, whereas during 2001, the U.S.
Dollar strengthened in relation to the European Euro. This was partially offset
by the foreign currency loss of SportRack Accessories which has intercompany
indebtedness denominated in U.S. Dollars. During 2002 the U.S. Dollar
strengthened in relation to the Canadian Dollar, the functional currency of
SportRack Accessories.

Provision (benefit) for income taxes. The Company and certain of its
domestic subsidiaries have elected to be taxed as limited liability companies
for federal income tax purposes. As a result of this election, the Company's
domestic taxable income accrues to the individual members. Certain of the
Company's domestic subsidiaries and foreign subsidiaries are subject to income
taxes in their respective jurisdictions. During 2002, the Company recorded a tax
provision amounting to $263,000 related to an ongoing income tax audit in Italy
covering the periods 1998 to 2001. During 2002, the Company had income before
income taxes for its taxable subsidiaries totaling $8.1 million and recorded a
provision for income taxes of $4.0 million exclusive of the $263,000 provision
related to the income tax audit. The effective tax rate differs from the U.S.
federal income tax rate primarily due to changes in valuation allowances on the
deferred tax assets of SportRack Accessories recorded during 2002 and
differences in the tax rates of foreign countries. During 2001, the Company had
a loss before income taxes for its taxable subsidiaries totaling $3.2 million
and recorded a provision for income taxes of $602,000. The provision in 2001
resulted primarily from the pretax income of Brink which was offset by the
pretax losses of SportRack Accessories. The tax benefit of SportRack Accessories
was offset by the increase in the valuation allowance recorded against the tax
assets of the subsidiary.

Cumulative effect of accounting change. On January 1, 2002, the Company
adopted the accounting standards set forth in Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" (SFAS 142). See "New
Accounting Pronouncements". As a result of this accounting change, the Company
recorded a loss totaling $29.2 million to write down goodwill recorded in
connection with the Valley Industries Acquisition.

Net income (loss). Net loss for 2002 was $11.6 million, as compared to
net income of $2.4 million in 2001, a change of $14.0 million. The change in net
loss is primarily attributable to the cumulative effect of accounting change due
to the adoption of SFAS 142 and the increase in the provision for income taxes,
offset partially by the increase in operating income, lower interest expense and
the foreign currency gain in 2002 as compared with the foreign currency loss in
2001.

2001 COMPARED TO 2000

Net sales. Net sales for 2001 were $314.0 million, representing a
decrease of $4.8 million, or 1.5%, from net sales for 2000. This decrease
resulted from decreased sales to OEMs of approximately $4.2 million and the
effect of declining exchange rates between the U.S. Dollar and the currencies
used by the Company's foreign subsidiaries totaling $2.1 million. The North
American OEMs reduced vehicle production beginning in the fourth quarter of 2000
and continuing in 2001 in response to lower sales of new vehicles in the North
American automotive market, resulting in an approximately $9.0 million decrease
in sales. Sales were also reduced by approximately $6.0 million as a result of
price decreases given to the Company's OEM customers during 2001. Additionally,
in efforts to reduce overall vehicle cost, certain of the Company's customers
reduced or eliminated certain components of their vehicles, including products
manufactured by the Company, resulting in an approximately $6.0 million decrease
in sales. These decreases were partially offset by approximately $17.0 million
in sales of new products for new vehicles introduced during 2001 and higher
sales to the automotive aftermarket totaling $1.4 million

Gross profit. Gross profit for 2001 was $74.5 million, representing a
decrease of $5.3 million, or 6.6%, from the gross profit for 2000. Gross profit
as a percentage of net sales was 23.7% in 2001 compared to 25.0% in 2000. The
decrease in the gross margin percentage was primarily attributable to price
reductions given to the Company's largest customer which were only partially
offset by internal cost reductions. Additionally, the Company's North American
OEM towing business continued to experience reduced productivity during 2001.
The gross profit percentage was also reduced due to proportionately lower sales
for Brink which has a greater gross margin percentage as compared with the
Company as a whole. Reduced sales for Brink are attributable to the decline in
the exchange rate between the European Euro and the U.S. Dollar for 2001
compared with 2000.

16

Selling, administrative and product development expenses. Selling,
administrative and product development expenses for 2001 were $44.8 million,
representing a decrease of $758,000, or 1.7%, compared with the selling,
administrative and product development expenses for 2000. The decrease resulted
from an approximately $633,000 reduction in corporate administrative expenses,
lower sales at Brink, which has greater selling, administrative and product
development expenses as a percentage of sales compared to the Company as a
whole, and the lack of approximately $900,000 of legal and accounting costs
incurred in 2000 related to a potential recapitalization of the Company's equity
securities during the year, partially offset by the lack of the $1.9 million
benefit recognized in 2000 related to a contingent obligation to a customer.
Selling, administrative and product development expenses as a percentage of net
sales was 14.3% in 2001 and 2000.

Operating income. Operating income for 2001 was $26.4 million, a
decrease of $4.5 million, or 14.7%, compared with operating income for 2000. The
decrease in operating income reflects the decrease in gross profit partially
offset by the decrease in selling, administrative and product development
expenses. Operating income as a percentage of net sales decreased to 8.4% in
2001 from 9.7% in 2000 due primarily to the decrease in the gross margin
percentage.

Interest expense. Interest expense for 2001 was $17.7 million, a
decrease of $266,000 from interest expense for 2000. Lower average indebtedness
and lower interest rates on the Company's variable rate debt were partially
offset by $342,000 of bank fees related to amending the Second Amended and
Restated Credit Agreement and $150,000 more interest recorded in 2001 than 2000
for an estimated contingent legal liability, see Item 3 "Legal Proceedings".

Foreign currency loss. Foreign currency loss in 2001 was $4.9 million,
compared to a foreign currency loss of $5.4 million in 2000. The Company's
foreign currency loss during 2001 was primarily related to Brink and SportRack
Accessories, each of which have indebtedness, including intercompany
indebtedness, denominated in U.S. Dollars. During 2001 and 2000, the U.S. Dollar
strengthened significantly in relation to the European Euro, the functional
currency of Brink. The U.S. Dollar strengthening was less significant during
2001 than 2000. Additionally, the U.S. Dollar strengthened significantly in
relation to the Canadian Dollar, the functional currency of SportRack
Accessories.

Other expense. Other expense for 2001 consists primarily of losses on
the disposal of property and equipment.

Provision (benefit) for income taxes. The Company and certain of its
domestic subsidiaries have elected to be taxed as limited liability companies
for federal income tax purposes. As a result of this election, most of the
Company's domestic taxable income accrues to the individual members. Certain of
the Company's domestic subsidiaries and foreign subsidiaries are subject to
income taxes in their respective jurisdictions. During 2001, the Company had a
loss before income taxes for its taxable subsidiaries totaling $3.1 million but
recorded a provision for income taxes of $602,000. The provision resulted
primarily from the pretax income of Brink which was offset by the pretax losses
of SportRack Accessories. The tax benefit for SportRack Accessories was offset
by the increase in the valuation allowance recorded against the tax assets of
the subsidiary. Additionally, the effective tax rate differs from the U.S.
federal income tax rate due to differences in the tax rates of foreign
countries. During 2000, the Company had a loss before income taxes for its
taxable subsidiaries totaling $3.0 million and recorded a benefit for income
taxes of $278,000.

Net income. Net income for 2001 was $2.4 million, as compared to net
income of $7.8 million in 2000, a decrease of $5.4 million. The change in net
income is primarily attributable to the decrease in operating income and
increases in other expenses and taxes, partially offset by the decrease in
foreign currency losses.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Company's principal liquidity requirements are to service its debt and
meet its working capital and capital expenditure needs. The Company's
indebtedness at December 31, 2001 was $154.9 million, including current
maturities of $18.2 million. The Company expects to be able to meet its
liquidity requirements through cash provided by operations and through
borrowings available under the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement
("U.S. Credit Facility") or a replacement facility which the Company plans to
negotiate on or prior to October 30, 2003.

17

Working Capital and Cash Flows

Working capital and key elements of the consolidated statement of cash flows
are:

Working Capital

Working capital decreased by $2.4 million to $21.0 million at December
31, 2002 from $23.4 million at December 31, 2001. This decrease was due
primarily to a decrease in inventory of $2.0 million, a change in current
deferred tax assets and liabilities of $1.5 million, an increase in accrued
liabilities of $6.2 million, an increase in accounts payable of $2.5 million, an
increase in the current portion of long term debt of $7.2 million and an
increase in mandatorily redeemable warrants of $120,000. These working capital
decreases were partially offset by an increase in accounts receivable of $4.4
million, an increase of $8.5 million in other current assets, an increase in
cash of $514,000 and an increase related to foreign currency exchange rate of
the Company's subsidiaries' functional currencies against the U.S. dollar of
$6.1 million

The increase in accounts receivable was attributable to increased sales
levels in the fourth quarter of 2002 as compared with the fourth quarter of 2001
and to a difference in the timing of a payment from the Company's second largest
OEM customer. Differences in sales levels between the two quarters are partly
due to increased sales to automotive OEMs. Increases in accounts payable during
the quarter reflected increased purchasing activities to support the increased
sales volume. Inventory decreased primarily at Brink and Valley which sold
product out of inventory during a plant reorganization in the Netherlands.
Accrued liabilities increased as a result of an increase of $2.9 million in
accrued expenses for the G 3.0 recall, by $2.7 million in accrued income taxes
and by $1.0 million for accrued unexecuted transaction costs. Other current
assets increased primarily due to an increased amount of tooling costs
reimbursable from the Company's North American OEM customers related to new
programs currently under development and for advances receivable under an
operating lease at Brink.

Operating Activities

Cash flow provided by operating activities for 2002 was $21.0 million,
compared to $27.7 million in 2001 and $21.4 million in 2000. Cash flow provided
by operating activities for 2002 decreased from 2001 primarily due to a smaller
decrease in working capital during 2002 and a net investment in noncurrent
assets in 2002 (compared to a decrease in noncurrent assets in 2001), partially
offset by higher income in 2002 (before depreciation and amortization, deferred
taxes, foreign currency gains and losses, loss on disposal of assets, and the
cumulative effect of the accounting change for goodwill impairment). Cash flow
for 2001 increased from 2000 primarily due to a net decrease in working capital
investment during 2001.

The Company's European and Canadian subsidiaries have income tax net
operating loss carryforwards ("NOLs") of approximately $1.6 million and $2.4
million, respectively, at December 31, 2002. The European NOLs have no
expiration date and the Canadian NOLs expire in 2005 through 2008. Management
believes that it is more likely than not that a portion of the deferred tax
assets of the Canadian subsidiaries will not be realized and a valuation
allowance of $2.8 million has been recorded against such assets. No valuation
allowance has been recorded for the European NOLs as it is management's belief
that it is more likely than not that the related deferred tax asset will be
realized.

Investing Activities

Investing cash flows include acquisitions of property and equipment of $15.4
million, $7.6 million and $10.4 million in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
Capital expenditures for 2002 include approximately $9.0 million for a new
production facility constructed in France during the year. The facility replaced
a former factory also in France. The move from the old facility occurred in
October 2002 and the plant is currently ramping up to full production capacity.
The lower capital expenditures during 2001 reflected a reduced need to increase
production capacity and management's efforts to increase the productivity of
existing equipment. The Company estimates that capital expenditures for 2003
will be approximately $11.0 million, primarily for the expansion of capacity,
productivity and process improvements and maintenance. The Company's 2003
capital expenditures are anticipated to be paid for from cash flow

18

provided by operating activities or borrowings against the Company's revolving
notes and include approximately $4.0 million for replacing and upgrading
existing equipment. The Company's ability to make capital expenditures is
subject to restrictions in the U.S. Credit Facility, including a maximum of
$12.5 million of capital expenditures annually plus the amount that capital
expenditures were less than $12.5 million in the preceding year. Maximum capital
expenditures for 2002 was $17.4 million.

Investing cash flows in 2000 include $2.8 million for the acquisitions of
Titan and Barrecrafters.

Financing Activities

During 2002, financing cash flows included payments of principal on the
Company's term indebtedness of $13.4 million, net borrowing of $5.6 million on
the Company's revolving line of credit, borrowing against a new capital lease
for the new plant in France of $5.6 million and distributions to members in
amounts sufficient to meet the tax liability of the Company's domestic taxable
income which accrues to individual members totaling $3.4 million.

During 2001, financing cash flows included payments of principal on the
Company's term indebtedness of $11.7 million, net payments of $8.3 million on
the Company's revolving line of credit and distributions to members in amounts
sufficient to meet the tax liability on the Company's domestic taxable income
which accrues to individual members totaling $801,000.

During 2000, financing cash flows included net borrowings on the Company's
revolving line of credit totaling $11.3 million offset by payments of principal
on the Company's term indebtedness of $13.9 million, distributions to members in
amounts sufficient to meet the tax liability on the Company's domestic taxable
income which accrues to individual members totaling $6.1 million and repurchase
of membership units of $6.4 million. Principal payments included $12.5 million
in scheduled repayments and a $1.4 million mandatory prepayment required as a
result of the Company having excess cash flows during 1999 as defined by the
U.S. Credit Facility.

Debt and Credit Sources

Borrowings under the Company's U.S. Credit Facility and the Company's First
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement ("Canadian Credit Facility") bear interest
at floating rates, which require interest payments on varying dates depending on
the interest rate option selected by the Company. Under the terms of these
credit facilities, the Company will be required to make principal payments
totaling approximately $17.6 million in 2003 and $6.4 million in 2004. On
December 15, 2001, the Company entered into Amendment No. 9 to the U.S. Credit
Facility which reset certain financial covenants for fiscal years 2001 and 2002
and provided the Company with additional liquidity by adding a conditional
supplemental revolving loan facility of up to $10.0 million which is available
until March 31, 2003. The Notes bear interest at 9.75% which is payable
semiannually in arrears. See "Note 3" to the Company's "Consolidated Financial
Statements" for additional information regarding the U.S. Credit Facility, the
Canadian Credit Facility and the Senior Subordinated Notes.

On October 30, 2003 the U.S. Credit Facility and the Canadian Credit
Facility will expire. The Company plans to negotiate a replacement facility on
or before that date.

The Company's indebtedness was $154.9 million at December 31, 2002. The
Company expects that its primary sources of cash will be from operating
activities and borrowings under the U.S. Credit Facility and Canadian Credit
Facility, each of which provide the Company with revolving notes. As of December
31, 2002, the Company had $8.6 million borrowed under the revolving note of the
U.S. Credit Facility and had outstanding letters of credit of $8.3 million
issued to benefit plaintiffs in a lawsuit against the Company and $800,000
provided as security for the Company's workers compensation benefit program in
North America. For a description of the Company's contingent obligations with
respect to that lawsuit, see Item 3 "Legal Proceedings". After the above items,
the Company had $17.3 million of available borrowing capacity. No amounts were
borrowed under the revolving note of the Canadian Credit Facility or the
conditional supplemental revolving note. Future acquisitions, if any, may
require additional third party financing and there can be no assurances that
such funds would be available on terms satisfactory to the Company, if at all.

As announced on March 14, 2003 the Company and Castle Harlan, a private
equity investment firm, are in the latter stages of negotiations regarding the
purchase of the Company by affiliates of Castle Harlan. Consummation of the sale
would be contingent upon satisfaction of customary legal and business
conditions, including, among other things, Castle Harlan's obtaining sufficient
third party debt financing to complete the transaction. Any definitive
transaction is expected to involve a redemption of the Company's outstanding
9 3/4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2007 at the current optional redemption
price of 104 7/8% of principal amount, plus accrued interest.

19

The Company's ability to satisfy its debt obligations will depend upon its
future operating performance, which will be affected by prevailing economic
conditions and financial, business, and other factors, certain of which are
beyond its control, as well as the availability of revolving credit borrowings
under the U.S. Credit Facility and the Canadian Credit Facility or successor
facilities. The Company anticipates that, based on current and expected levels
of operations, its operating cash flow, together with borrowings under the U.S.
Credit Facility and the Canadian Credit Facility, should be sufficient to meet
its debt service, working capital and capital expenditure requirements for the
foreseeable future, although no assurances can be given in this regard,
including as to the ability to increase revenues or profit margins. If the
Company is unable to service its indebtedness, it will be forced to take actions
such as reducing or delaying acquisitions and/or capital expenditures, selling
assets, restructuring or refinancing its indebtedness, or seeking additional
equity capital. There is no assurance that any of these remedies can be effected
on satisfactory terms, if at all, including, whether, and on what terms, the
Company could raise equity capital. See "Forward Looking Statements" and the
introductory paragraph of this Item 7.

The Company conducts operations in several foreign countries including
Canada, The Netherlands, Denmark, the United Kingdom, Sweden, France, Germany,
Poland, Spain, the Czech Republic and Italy. Net sales from international
operations during 2002 were approximately $98.6 million, or 29.9% of the
Company's net sales. At December 31, 2002, assets associated with these
operations were approximately 46.7% of total assets, and the Company had
indebtedness denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar of
approximately $1.9 million.

The Company's international operations may be subject to volatility because
of currency fluctuations, inflation and changes in political and economic
conditions in these countries. Most of the revenues and costs and expenses of
the Company's operations in these countries are denominated in the local
currencies. The financial position and results of operations of the Company's
foreign subsidiaries are measured using the local currency as the functional
currency. Certain of the Company's foreign subsidiaries have debt denominated in
currencies other than their functional currency. As the exchange rates between
the currency of the debt and the subsidiaries functional currency change, the
Company is subject to foreign currency gains and losses.

The Company may periodically use foreign currency forward option contracts
to offset the effects of exchange rate fluctuations on cash flows denominated in
foreign currencies. The Company has no outstanding foreign currency forward
options at December 31, 2002 and does not use derivative financial instruments
for trading or speculative purposes.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The Company prepared its financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the Unites States of America. In this process,
it is often necessary for management to select accounting policies and make
estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain. Estimates are developed
using various methods and by making certain assumptions and require management
to make subjective and complex judgments. Variations in these accounting
policies and estimates can significantly affect the amounts reported in the
consolidated financial statements and the attached notes. These methods and
assumptions have been developed based upon available information. However actual
results can differ from assumed and estimated amounts.

The significant accounting polices applied in preparing the Company's
financial statements are described in Note 1 to the financial statements.
Policies which are considered critical are described below.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. Management evaluates the potential
impairment of long-lived assets on an ongoing basis or whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not
be recoverable. At that time, a comparison is made between estimated future cash
flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition
and the carrying value of the asset. Future cash flows are estimated using
current and forecasted revenues, projected profit margins and the current and
expected future economic environment. Impairments of long-lived assets may be
reported if the facts and circumstances surrounding assumptions made in
developing estimates of future cash flows were to change. The Company changed
its methodology for assessing goodwill impairments beginning on January 1, 2002,
see "New Accounting Pronouncements".

Contingent obligations and losses. The Company is subject to various
contingent obligations and losses including contingent legal obligations, see
Item 3. "Legal Proceedings". The Company establishes reserves for contingent
obligations and losses when information concerning an obligation or loss
indicates that it is probable that an asset had been impaired or a liability had
been incurred provided that the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated.
Estimates of the cost are derived using known and assumed facts related to the
specific circumstances surrounding each obligation. Management reviews and
updates these estimates periodically. The ultimate cost of the Company's
contingent obligations may be greater or less than the established accruals and
could have a material impact upon the Company's financial position, results
of operations or cash flows.

20

Workers compensation expense. The Company establishes accruals for workers'
compensation claims utilizing actuarial methods to estimate the undiscounted
future cash payments that will be made to satisfy the claims. The estimates are
based both on historical experience, industry trends and current legal, economic
and regulatory factors. The ultimate cost of these claims may be greater than or
less than the established accrual and could have a material impact upon the
Company's financial position and results of operations.

NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In November 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
Interpretation No. 45, Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for
Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others (FIN 45).
FIN 45 provides guidance on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its
interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under certain
guarantees that it has issued and also clarifies that a guarantor is require to
recognize, at the inception for a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of
the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. The recognition and
measurement provisions of FIN 45 are not expected to have a material effect on
the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted the accounting standards set forth
in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, "Goodwill and other
Intangible Assets" ("SFAS 142") and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets" ("SFAS
144"). SFAS 142 changed the methodology for assessing goodwill impairments. The
initial application of this statement resulted in an impairment of goodwill of
$29.2 million to write down goodwill related to the Valley Industries
Acquisition. The impairment was due solely to the change in accounting standards
and was reported as a cumulative effect of accounting change. Under the new
standard, impairment is determined by comparing the carrying values of reporting
units to the corresponding fair values, which are determined based on the
discounted estimated future cash flows of the reporting units. As the impairment
related to Valley Industries, LLC for which taxable income accrues to the
individual members, no tax effect was recorded for this charge. Additionally,
under the new standard, goodwill is no longer amortized but is to be tested
periodically for impairment. The effect of no longer amortizing goodwill
resulted in a reduction of $3.0 million in amortization of intangible assets
during 2002 as compared with each of 2001 and 2000. The adoption of SFAS 144 did
not have a material impact on the Company's financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company is exposed to certain market risks which exist as a part of its
ongoing business operations. Primary exposures include fluctuations in the value
of foreign currency investments in subsidiaries, volatility in the translation
of foreign currency earnings to U.S. Dollars, indebtedness, including
intercompany indebtedness, of foreign subsidiaries denominated in currencies
other then their functional currency and movements in Federal Funds rates and
the London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR"). The Company, as a matter of policy,
does not engage in trading or speculative transactions.

The table below provides information about the Company's financial
instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates, which consist of
debt obligations. The table presents principal cash flows and related weighted
average interest rates by expected maturity dates. Intercompany indebtedness is
due on demand and is therefore shown as maturing in 2003. Weighted average
variable rates are based on current rates. The information is presented in U.S.
dollar equivalents, which is the Company's reporting currency. The instrument's
actual cash flows are denominated in U.S. dollars ($US) and Canadian dollars
($CAN), as indicated in parentheses.

21

The changes from 2001 to 2002 are primarily due to the Company's repayment
of approximately $13.4 million of term indebtedness, and net borrowings of
approximately $5.6 million of revolving loans and approximately $5.6 million
against a new capital lease financing in connection with the Company's new plant
in France.

The table below provides information about the Company's financial
instruments and foreign currency earnings by functional currency and presents
such information in U.S. dollar equivalents. The table summarizes information on
instruments, consisting of foreign currency investments in subsidiaries, and
foreign currency earnings that are sensitive to foreign currency exchange rates.
The Company has foreign currency investments in other currencies that are not
included in the table since they are not material. For foreign currency
investments, the table presents the amount invested (translated into U.S.
dollars at year-end exchange rates) and identifies the currency of the
investment and the exchange rate. For foreign currency earnings, the table
presents the amount of earnings (translated from the functional currency into
U.S. dollars at the average exchange rate for the year) and identifies the
functional currency and the exchange rate.

22

23

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Report of Independent Accountants ......................................... 25

Consolidated Balance Sheets -- December 31, 2002 and 2001 ................. 26

Consolidated Statements of Operations -- Years Ended December 31, 2002,
2001 and 2000 ........................................................... 27

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows -- Years Ended December 31, 2002,
2001 and 2000 ........................................................... 28

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Members' Equity -- Years Ended
December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 ........................................ 29

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ................................ 30

24

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

To the Board of Managers
and Members of
Advanced Accessory Systems, LLC

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying
index present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
Advanced Accessory Systems, LLC and its subsidiaries (the "Company") at December
31, 2002 and 2001, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002 in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In
addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index
appearing under Item 15-(a)-(2) presents fairly, in all material respects, the
information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related
consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial
statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management; our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and
financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits of
these statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the
United States of America, which require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing
the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard No. 142, "Goodwill and Intangible assets", which changed the
methodology for assessing goodwill impairments. The initial application of this
statement resulted in an impairment of goodwill of $29.2 million. The impairment
was due solely to the change in accounting standards, and was reported as a
cumulative effect of accounting change (See Note 1 "New accounting
pronouncements").

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Detroit, Michigan
February 28, 2003

25

ADVANCED ACCESSORY SYSTEMS, LLC

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

26

ADVANCED ACCESSORY SYSTEMS, LLC

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

27

ADVANCED ACCESSORY SYSTEMS, LLC

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

28

ADVANCED ACCESSORY SYSTEMS, LLC

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN MEMBERS' EQUITY
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

29

ADVANCED ACCESSORY SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT UNIT RELATED DATA)

1. SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

BUSINESS ACTIVITIES

Advanced Accessory Systems, LLC (the "Company") supplies towing and rack
systems and related accessories for the automotive original equipment
manufacturer ("OEM") market and the automotive aftermarket. The Company's
business commenced on September 28, 1995. The Company's products include a
comprehensive line of towing systems and rack systems including accessories. The
Company's towing systems products include fixed and detachable towing hitches
and accessories such as trailer balls, ball mounts, electrical harnesses, safety
chains and locking hitch pins. The Company's broad offering of rack systems
includes fixed and detachable racks and accessories which can be installed on
vehicles to carry items such as bicycles, skis, luggage, surfboards and
sailboards. The Company's products are sold as standard accessories or options
for a variety of light vehicles.

PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

The Company includes the accounts of the following:

SportRack, LLC ......................................... 100% owned by Advanced Accessory Systems, LLC
SportRack Automotive, GmbH
and its consolidated subsidiaries ................... A German corporation, 100% owned by SportRack, LLC
SportRack Accessories, Inc
and its consolidated subsidiary ..................... A Canadian corporation, 90% owned by the Advanced
Accessory Systems, LlC and 10% owned by SportRack, LLC
ValTek, LLC .......................................... 100% owned by SportRack, LLC
AAS Holdings, Inc. ..................................... 100% owned by Advanced Accessory Systems, LLC
Brink International B.V and
its consolidated subsidiaries ....................... A Dutch corporation, 100% owned by AAS Holdings, Inc.
Valley Industries, LLC ................................. 100% owned by Advanced Accessory Systems, LLC
AAS Capital Corporation ................................ 100% owned by Advanced Accessory Systems, LLC

All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

Revenue and related cost of goods sold are recognized upon shipment of the
product to the customer. Sales allowances, discounts, rebates and other
adjustments are recorded or accrued in the period of the sale.

SIGNIFICANT ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the
date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the fiscal period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.

During the year ended December 31, 2000, management decreased an estimated
liability related to a contingent obligation to one of its customers. The
reduction resulted in a benefit to the Company of approximately $1,900 which was
included in selling, administrative and product development expenses.

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Financial instruments at December 31, 2002 and 2001, including cash,
accounts receivable and accounts payable, are recorded at cost, which
approximates fair value due to the short-term maturities of these assets and
liabilities. The carrying value of the obligations under the bank agreements are
considered to approximate fair value as the agreements provide for interest rate
revisions based on changes in prevailing market rates or were entered into at
rates that approximate market rates at December 31, 2002 and 2001. The fair
value of the Notes (as defined below) as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 was
approximately $118,750 and $103,750 respectively, based upon quoted prices in
the market in which the Notes are traded.

30

ADVANCED ACCESSORY SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT UNIT RELATED DATA)

1. SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES -- (CONTINUED)

The Company is exposed to certain market risks which exist as a part of its
ongoing business operations. Primary exposures include fluctuations in the value
of foreign currency investments in subsidiaries, volatility in the translation
of foreign currency earnings to U.S. Dollars and movements in Federal Funds
rates and the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). The Company will use
derivative financial instruments, where appropriate, to manage these risks. The
Company, as a matter of policy, does not engage in trading or speculative
transactions.

CASH EQUIVALENTS

For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all
highly-liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less from the date
of purchase to be cash equivalents.

CURRENCY TRANSLATION

The functional currency for the Company's foreign subsidiaries is the
applicable local currency. Assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries are
translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect at the balance
sheet date; translation adjustments are reported as a separate component of
members' equity. Revenues, expenses and cash flows for foreign subsidiaries are
translated at average exchange rates during the period; foreign currency
transaction gains and losses are included in current earnings. The accompanying
consolidated statement of operations for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001
and 2000 includes net currency (gains) and losses of $(8,429), $4,948 and
$5,386, respectively, relating primarily to debt denominated in U.S. Dollars at
Brink International B.V., and SportRack Accessories, Inc. whose functional
currencies are the European Euro and Canadian Dollar, respectively. At December
31, 2002, U.S. Dollar denominated debt recorded at Brink includes intercompany
debt and substantially all outstanding term notes under the Company's Second
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement.

INVENTORIES

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost being
determined on the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Inventories are
periodically reviewed and reserves established for excess and obsolete items.

TOOLING

The Company incurs costs related to new tooling used in the manufacture of
products sold to OEMs. Tooling costs that are reimbursed by customers as the
tooling is completed are included in other current assets. All other customer
owned tooling costs, which totaled $302 and $1,111 at December 31, 2002 and
2001, respectively, are included in other noncurrent assets and amortized over
the expected product life, generally three to six years. Company owned tooling
is included in property and equipment and depreciated over its expected useful
life, generally three to five years. Management periodically evaluates the
recoverability of tooling costs, based on estimated future cash flows, and makes
provisions for tooling costs that will not be recovered, if any, when such
amounts are known and incurred.

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment is stated at acquisition cost, which reflects the
fair value of assets acquired at the acquisition date for all subsidiaries.
Property and equipment purchased other than through the acquisitions described
in Note 2 is stated at cost. Expenditures for normal repairs and maintenance are
charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation expense, which was $11,299,
$10,569 and $10,445 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000,
respectively, is computed using the straight-line method over the following
estimated useful lives:

31

ADVANCED ACCESSORY SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT UNIT RELATED DATA)

1. SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES -- (CONTINUED)

GOODWILL, LONG-LIVED ASSETS AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill of $47,308 and $73,394 at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively,
represents the costs in excess of net assets acquired and, until December 31,
2001, was amortized using the straight line method over periods of up to 30
years. Beginning in 2002, goodwill is no longer amortized, but is tested at
least annually for impairment. During 2002 Goodwill decreased by $29,207 for an
impairment charge resulting of the application of a new accounting standard and
increased by $3,121 due to the effects of the change in foreign currency rates
of the functional currencies of the Company's foreign subsidiaries between
December 31, 2002 and 2001. See "New Accounting Pronouncements" below.

The Company evaluates the potential impairment of goodwill on an ongoing
basis and reviews long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of an asset may not be fully recoverable. The Company determines
the impairment of long-lived assets by comparing the undiscounted future net
cash flows to be generated by the assets to their carrying value. Impairment
losses are then measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset
exceeds the fair value of the asset.

Debt issuance costs net of accumulated amortization of $3,254 and $4,093 at
December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively, are amortized over the terms of the
loan agreements, which are six to ten years. Debt issuance cost amortization of
$906, $677 and $625 for 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively, has been included in
interest expense.

INCOME TAXES

The Company and certain of its domestic subsidiaries have elected to be
taxed as limited liability companies for federal income tax purposes. As a
result of this election, the Company's domestic taxable income accrues to the
individual members. Distributions are made to the members in amounts sufficient
to meet the tax liability on the Company's domestic taxable income accruing to
the individual members. Distributions to members of $3,356, $801 and $6,090 were
made during 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

Certain of the Company's domestic subsidiaries and foreign subsidiaries are
subject to income taxes in their respective jurisdictions. Income tax provisions
for these entities are based on the U.S. Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes". Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are provided for the expected future tax consequences of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts and the tax basis of such entities'
assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance
for tax benefits that are not expected to be realized. The Company does not
provide for U.S. income taxes or foreign withholding taxes on the undistributed
earnings of foreign subsidiaries because of management's intent to permanently
reinvest in such operations.

The Company and certain subsidiaries are subject to taxes, including
Michigan Single Business Tax and Canadian capital tax, which are based primarily
on factors other than income. As such, these amounts are included in selling,
administrative and product development expenses in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations. Deferred taxes related to Michigan Single Business Tax
are provided on the temporary differences resulting from capital acquisitions
and depreciation.

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING

Research, development and engineering costs are expensed as incurred and
aggregated approximately $8,490, $9,397 and $9,779 for the years ended December
31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

32

ADVANCED ACCESSORY SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT UNIT RELATED DATA)

1. SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES -- (CONTINUED)

NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In November 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB
Interpretation No. 45, Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for
Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others (FIN 45).
FIN 45 provides guidance on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its
interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under certain
guarantees that it has issued and also clarifies that a guarantor is require to
recognize, at the inception for a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of
the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. In addition, FIN 45 requires
additional disclosures about the guarantees that an entity has issued including
those related to product warranties (See Note 11). The recognition and
measurement provisions of FIN 45 are not expected to have a material effect on
the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted the accounting standards set forth
in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, "Goodwill and other
Intangible Assets" ("SFAS 142") and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets" ("SFAS
144"). The adoption of SFAS 144 did not have a material impact on the Company's
financial position, results of operations or cash flows. SFAS 142 changed the
methodology for assessing goodwill impairments. The initial application of this
statement resulted in an impairment of goodwill of $29,207 to write down
goodwill related to the Valley Industries Acquisition. The impairment was due
solely to the change in accounting standards and was reported as a cumulative
effect of accounting change in 2002. Under SFAS 142, impairment is determined by
comparing the carrying values of reporting units to the corresponding fair
values, which are determined based on the discounted estimated future cash flows
of the reporting units. As the impairment related to Valley Industries, LLC for
which taxable income accrues to the individual members, no tax effect was
recorded for this charge. Additionally, under the new standard, goodwill is no
longer amortized but is to be tested at least annually for impairment. The
effect of no longer amortizing goodwill resulted in a reduction in amortization
of intangible assets during 2002 as compared with 2001 and 2000 of $2,996 and
$2,998, respectively. The following table presents net income (loss) for 2001
and 2000 as adjusted for the non-amortization provisions of SFAS 142.

Other intangible assets at December 31, 2002 and 2001 consist of deferred
financing costs, a defined benefit pension asset and patents and licenses.

Aggregate amortization expense related to other intangible assets for each
of the five succeeding fiscal years is as follows:

2003................................................................ $807
2004................................................................ 567
2005................................................................ 608
2006................................................................ 653
2007................................................................ 689

For the year ended December 31, 2002, the carrying amount of goodwill
decreased by $29,207 as a result of the impairment write down discussed above
and increased by $3,121 as a result of the change in exchange rates between the
U.S. Dollar and the European Euro, the functional currency of Brink
International B.V.

Effective June 30, 2001, the Company adopted Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) Consensus 00-19, "Determination of Whether Share Settlement is Within the
Control of the Issuer for Purposes of Applying Issue No. 96-13, 'Accounting for
Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a
Company's Own Stock'". Accordingly, based upon the terms of the warrants, the
Company has reclassified the mandatorily redeemable warrants to a component of
current liabilities. Accretion is included in the determination of net income or
loss for each reporting period.

33

ADVANCED ACCESSORY SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT UNIT RELATED DATA)

2. ACQUISITIONS

Acquisitions of the Company from January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2002
are as follows:

The above acquisitions have each been accounted for in accordance with the
purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, the respective purchase price of
each acquisition has been allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed
based upon their estimated fair values at the acquisition date. The excess of
the aggregate purchase price over the estimated fair value of the net assets
acquired has been recorded as goodwill. The operating results of these entities
have been included in the Company's consolidated financial statements since the
date of each acquisition. Each acquisition represented the purchase of the
assets of the respective company and each acquired company was purchased for
cash.

Pro forma results have not been presented as they are substantially the same
as the Company's actual results.

3. LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt is comprised of the following:

SENIOR SUBORDINATED NOTES

Borrowings under the Company's Series B Senior Subordinated Notes (the
"Notes"), due October 1, 2007, are unsecured and are subordinated in right of
payment to all existing and future senior indebtedness of the Company, including
the loans under the U.S. and Canadian Credit Agreements described below. The
Company, at its option, may redeem the Notes, in whole or in part, together with
accrued and unpaid interest at certain redemption prices as set forth by the
indenture under which the Notes have been issued. Upon the occurrence of a
change of control of the Company, as defined by the indenture, the Company is
required to make an offer to repurchase the Notes at a price equal to 101% of
the principal amount of the Notes. The indenture places certain limits on the
Company, the most restrictive of which include the restrictions on the
incurrence of additional indebtedness by the Company, the payment of dividends
on and redemption of capital of the Company, the redemption of, certain
subordinated obligations, investments, sales of assets and stock of certain
subsidiaries, transactions with affiliates, consolidations, mergers and
transfers of all or substantially all of the Company's assets. Interest on the
Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on April 1 and October 1 of each year.

34

ADVANCED ACCESSORY SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT UNIT RELATED DATA)

3. LONG-TERM DEBT -- (CONTINUED)

SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

The Company's Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement ("U.S. Credit
Facility"), which is administered by Bank One and The Chase Manhattan Bank
("Chase"), is secured by substantially all the assets of the Company and places
certain restrictions on the Company related to indebtedness, sales of assets,
investments, capital expenditures, dividend payments, management fees, and
members' equity transactions. In addition, the agreement subjects the Company to
certain restrictive covenants, including the attainment of designated operating
ratios and minimum net worth levels. The Company, at its election, may make
prepayments of the term notes under the credit agreement on a pro-rata basis.
Additionally, mandatory prepayments of the term notes are required in the event
of sales of assets meeting certain criteria, as set forth by the agreement, or
based upon periodic calculations of excess cash flows, as defined by the
agreement. On December 15, 2001, the Company entered into Amendment No. 9 to the
U.S. Credit Facility which reset certain financial covenants for fiscal years
2001 and 2002 and provided the Company with additional liquidity by adding a
conditional supplemental revolving loan facility of up to $10.0 million which is
available until March 31, 2003.

The U.S. Credit Facility provides for two term notes (Term note A and Term
note B), a revolving line of credit note, an acquisition note and a supplemental
revolving loan note. Loans under each of the term notes and the revolving notes
can be converted, at the election of the Company, in whole or in part, into Base
Rate Loans or Eurocurrency Loans. Interest is payable in arrears quarterly on
Base Rate Loans, and in arrears in one, two or three months on Eurocurrency
Loans, as determined by the length of the Eurocurrency Loan, as selected by the
Company. Interest is charged at an adjustable rate plus the applicable margin.
The applicable margin is based upon the Company's Leverage Ratio, as defined by
the Credit Agreement. Eurocurrency Loans under each of the term notes can be
made in U.S. dollars or certain other currencies, at the option of the Company.
The U.S. Credit Facility also provides for a Letter of Credit Facility. At
December 31, 2002 and 2001, the Company had irrevocable letters of credit
outstanding in the amount of $9,125 and $8,041, respectively (see Note 11).

Term note A

On October 30, 1996, the Company borrowed $65,000 under Term note A. On October
1, 1997, the Company made a mandatory prepayment totaling $43,475 in connection
with the issuance of the Notes. Mandatory prepayments of $29 and $518 were made
in August 2001 and June 2000, respectively, for the excess cash flows of the
Company as defined by the Credit Agreement. No amounts remain outstanding under
the note as of December 31, 2002.

Term note B

On August 5, 1997, the Company borrowed $55,000 under Term note B. On
October 1, 1997, the Company made a mandatory prepayment totaling $39,044 in
connection with the issuance of the Notes. Mandatory prepayments of $2,299 and
$833 were made in August 2002 and June 2000, respectively, for the excess cash
flows of the Company as defined by the Credit Agreement. At December 31, 2002,
the applicable margin for Term note B ranges from 2.75% to 3.75% for Base Rate
Loans and from 3.50% to 4.50% for Eurocurrency Loans. Repayments under Term note
B are required in the following installments:

March 31, 2003 through September 30, 2003 (quarterly)............... $ 73
December 31, 2003................................................... 2,914
March 31, 2004...................................................... 3,764
June 30, 2004....................................................... 2,592

35

ADVANCED ACCESSORY SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT UNIT RELATED DATA)

3. LONG-TERM DEBT -- (CONTINUED)

Acquisition note

On December 31, 1997, the Company borrowed $21,000 under its acquisition
note. The proceeds were used to acquire the assets of Ellebi on January 2, 1998.
At December 31, 2002, the applicable margin for acquisition note ranges from
2.25% to 3.25% for Base Rate Loans and from 3.00% to 4.00% for Eurocurrency
Loans. Repayments under the acquisition note are due in equal quarterly
installments of $1,312 through September 30, 2003.

Revolving line of credit note

The Company has the ability to borrow up to $25,000 under the revolving line
of credit, which expires on October 30, 2003. Available borrowings, however, are
limited to a defined borrowing base amount equal to 85% of eligible domestic
accounts receivable and 80% of certain eligible foreign accounts receivable. The
base borrowing amount is increased by the lesser of the sum of 50% of domestic
eligible inventory and 40% to 50% of certain eligible foreign inventory or
$10,000. Available borrowings are reduced by amounts outstanding under the
Canadian revolving line of credit note described below and outstanding letters
of credit. At December 31, 2002, $7,301 was available for borrowing on the note.
At December 31, 2002, the applicable margin for revolving line of credit note
ranges from 2.25% to 3.25% for Base Rate Loans and from 3.00% to 4.00% for
Eurocurrency Loans. A commitment fee of 0.5% to 0.625% is charged on the unused
balance based on the Company's Senior Leverage Ratio, as defined.

Supplemental revolving loan note

When the availability under the revolving line of credit note reaches zero,
the Company has the ability to borrow up to $10,000 under the supplemental
revolving loan note. Available borrowings are limited to the same borrowing base
as the revolving line of credit note to the extent the borrowing base exceeds
$25,000. At December 31, 2002, $10,000 in borrowings were available on the note.
At December 31, 2002, the applicable margin for supplemental revolving note
ranges from 2.25% to 3.25% for Base Rate Loans and from 3.00% to 4.00% for
Eurocurrency Loans. A commitment fee of 0.5% to 0.625% is charged on the unused
balance based on the Company's Senior Leverage Ratio, as defined. A mandatory
prepayment of all outstanding loans under the note is due if the Company reports
Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization ('EBITDA'), as
defined by the agreement, of less than $32,000 on a trailing four quarter basis
at the end of any fiscal quarter. The note expires on March 31, 2003.

FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

The Company's First Amended and Restated Credit Agreement ("Canadian Credit
Facility"), which is administered by Bank One and The Chase Manhattan Bank of
Canada ("Chase Canada"), is secured by substantially all of the assets of the
Company's Canadian subsidiaries and is guaranteed by the Company.

The Canadian Credit Facility provides for a C$20,000 term note and a C$4,000
revolving note, (U.S. $12,662 and U.S. $2,532, respectively at December 31,
2002). Loans under each of the notes can be converted at the election of the
Company, in whole or in part, into Floating Rate advances, U.S. Base Rate
advances or LIBOR advances. Floating rate advances are denominated in Canadian
dollars and bear interest at a variable rate based on the bank's prime lending
rate plus a variable margin. U.S. Base Rate advances are denominated in U.S.
dollars and bear interest at the bank's prime lending rate plus a variable
margin. LIBOR advances are denominated in U.S. dollars and bear interest at
LIBOR plus a variable margin. The variable margin is based upon the Company's
Senior Debt Ratio, as defined by the Canadian Credit Facility and ranges from
0.5% to 1.75% for Floating Rate advances and U.S. Base Rate advances and from
1.5% to 2.75% for LIBOR advances.

36

ADVANCED ACCESSORY SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT UNIT RELATED DATA)

3. LONG-TERM DEBT -- (CONTINUED)

Canadian term note

Repayments under the Canadian term note are required in the following
installments:

Canadian revolving line of credit note

A commitment fee of 0.5% is charged on the unused balance of the Canadian
revolving line of credit note.

SENIOR SUBORDINATED LOANS

On October 30, 1996, the Company borrowed $20,000 under its Senior
Subordinated Note Purchase Agreement ("Senior Subordinated Loans") with J.P.
Morgan Partners (23A SBIC), LLC, an affiliate of J.P. Morgan Partners, LLC, and
International Mezzanine. The Senior Subordinated Loans were repaid in full on
October 1, 1997 with the proceeds of the Notes discussed above.

In connection with the issuance of the Senior Subordinated Loans, the
Company issued warrants to purchase 1,002 membership units. The warrants have an
exercise price of one cent per warrant, are exercisable immediately, and expire
October 30, 2004. As provided in the Warrant Agreement, the warrant holder can
put the warrants and membership units acquired through the exercise of the
warrants back to the Company before the earlier of October 30, 2004 and the
consummation of a Qualified Public Offering for an amount equal to Fair Market
Value, as defined. Additionally, as provided in the Warrant Agreement, the
Company may call the warrants and membership units acquired through the exercise
of the warrants at any time after the sixth anniversary of the Closing Date, but
prior to the earlier of October 30, 2004 or a Qualified Public Offering for an
amount equal to Fair Market Value, as defined. At the date of issuance, the
proceeds from the Senior Subordinated Loans were allocated between the Senior
Subordinated Loans and the warrants based upon their estimated relative fair
market value.

The warrants were accreted to their estimated redemption value through
periodic charges against Members' Equity through October 30, 2001 or the time
redemption first becomes available. Thereafter the warrants are being recorded
at the then estimated redemption value. The aforementioned warrants have been
presented as mandatorily redeemable warrants in the accompanying balance sheets.

CAPITAL LEASES

During 2002, the Company borrowed Euro 5,702 (U.S. $5,978 as of December 31,
2002) under a Euro 6,850 ($7,183 as of December 31, 2002) 12 year lease for a
new manufacturing plant in France. The remaining amount available under the
lease will be borrowed by the Company in the first quarter of 2003. Repayments
under the lease are due in 48 equal quarterly installments of Euro 143 (U.S.
$150 as of December 31, 2002) plus interest and commence on March 31, 2003.
Interest accrues at a fixed rate of 5.21% on half of the outstanding loan
balance and accrues on the balance of the outstanding loan balance at an
adjustable rate, which is determined each quarter by reference to the three
month Euribor rate plus a margin of 0.85%.

The Company also has entered into various other capital lease arrangements
for certain machinery and equipment. These leases generally require monthly
payments of principal and interest and have terms from three to five years. At
December 31, 2002 the present value of the remaining payments outstanding under
these other capital leases totaled $306.

37

ADVANCED ACCESSORY SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT UNIT RELATED DATA)

3. LONG-TERM DEBT -- (CONTINUED)

SCHEDULED MATURITIES

The aggregate scheduled annual principal payments due in each of the years
ending December 31, is as follows:

2003............................................................ $ 18,215
2004............................................................ 7,083
2005............................................................ 662
2006............................................................ 658
2007............................................................ 125,599
Thereafter...................................................... 3,013
--------
155,230
Less -- discount................................................ (283)
--------
$154,947
========

4. MEMBERS' EQUITY

Holders of Class A Units are eligible to vote in elections of Managers of
the Company and other matters as set forth in the Company's Operating Agreement
and By-Laws and are convertible to Class A-1 Units by holders that are regulated
financial institutions. Class A-1 Units are non-voting but are otherwise
entitled to the identical rights as holders of Class A Units and are convertible
to Class A units provided such conversion is not in violation of certain
governmental regulations of the unit holder.

Holders of Class B Units are entitled to such rights as designated by the
Board of Managers upon the original issuance of any Class B Units provided,
however, that those rights shall not be senior to the rights of the holders of
Class A units as to allocations of net profits and as to distributions without
the consent of a majority in interest of Class A Members. There were no Class B
Units issued as of December 31, 2002 or 2001.

Effective January 1, 2000, the Company issued 3,655 of its Class A-1 Units
in exchange for an equal amount of Class A Units.

Effective November 11, 2000, the Company issued 1,478 of its Class A-1
Units in exchange for an equal amount of Class A Units.

5. INCOME TAXES

The Company's C corporation subsidiaries and taxable foreign subsidiaries
account for income taxes in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes". The Company and certain
domestic subsidiaries are limited liability companies; as such, the Company's
earnings are included in the taxable income of the Company's members. Income
(loss) before income taxes were attributable to the following sources:

38

ADVANCED ACCESSORY SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT UNIT RELATED DATA)

5. INCOME TAXES -- (CONTINUED)

The provision (benefit) for income taxes is comprised of the following:

The effective tax rates differ from the U.S. federal income tax rate as
follows:

Deferred tax assets and liabilities, related primarily to the Company's
foreign subsidiaries, comprise the following:

The net operating loss carryforwards of the Company's European subsidiaries
approximate $1,554 at December 31, 2002 and have no expiration date. The net
operating loss carryforwards of the Company's Canadian subsidiaries approximate
$2,425 at December 31, 2002 and expire primarily in 2005 through 2008. As of
December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively, the Company recorded a valuation
allowance of $2,799 and $5,739 based upon management's current assessment of the
likelihood of realizing the Canadian subsidiaries' deferred tax assets.
Management believes that it is more likely than not that the related deferred
tax assets recorded for its other subsidiaries will be realized and no valuation
allowance has been provided against such amounts as of December 31, 2002. If
certain substantial changes in the Company's ownership should occur, there could
be an annual limit on the amount of certain carryforwards which can be utilized.

39

ADVANCED ACCESSORY SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT UNIT RELATED DATA)

6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS AND ALLOCATIONS

A portion of the Company's U.S. Credit Facility, Canadian Credit Facility
and Senior Subordinated Loans, as described in Note 4, is with Chase and Chase
Canada, which are each affiliates of a member of the Company, and J.P. Morgan
Partners (23A SBIC), LLC, respectively.

Charges to operations related to consulting services provided to the
Company by certain members of the Company aggregated approximately $100, $361
and $406 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

Certain employees and consultants of the Company hold Class A Units of the
Company.

7. OPTION PLAN

The Company uses the disclosure requirements of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123 ("SFAS 123"), "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation". The
Company, however, elected to continue to measure compensation cost using the
intrinsic value method, in accordance with APB Opinion 25 ("APB 25"),
"Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees".

The Company has issued options to purchase Class A Units which are
outstanding under the Company's 1995 Option Plan (the "Plan"). As of December
31, 2002 and 2001, the Company was authorized under the Plan to issue options to
purchase up to 4,200 Class A Units to officers, directors and employees of the
Company and its subsidiaries. At December 31, 2002, there were 184 options that
remained available for grant under the Plan.

Information concerning options to purchase Class A Units is as follows:

All options granted have terms of 15 years and vest as follows:

The Company has elected to continue applying the provisions of APB 25 and
accordingly, recognized compensation expense of $450 for the year ended December
31, 2000. No compensation expense was recognized during 2002 or 2001 as no
options vested during those years. If compensation cost and the fair value of
options granted had been determined based upon the fair value method in
accordance with SFAS 123, the pro forma net (loss) income of the Company would
have been $(11,676), $2,256 and $8,047 for the years ended December 31, 2002,
2001 and 2000, respectively.

40

ADVANCED ACCESSORY SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT UNIT RELATED DATA)

7. OPTION PLAN -- (CONTINUED)

The fair value of options granted and related pro forma compensation cost
were estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with an expected
volatility of zero and the following assumptions:

The following table summarizes the status of the Company's options
outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2002:

8. PENSION PLANS

The Company has a defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all
of SportRack, LLC's domestic employees covered under a collective bargaining
agreement. An employee's monthly pension benefit is determined by multiplying a
defined dollar amount by the years of credited service earned. Plan assets are
comprised principally of marketable equity securities and short-term
investments. The Company's funding policy is to contribute annually the amounts
necessary to comply with ERISA funding requirements.

The following table sets forth the change in the plan's benefit obligations
and plan assets, and the funded status of the plan as of and for the years ended
December 31, 2002 and 2001:

41

ADVANCED ACCESSORY SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT UNIT RELATED DATA)

8. PENSION PLANS -- (continued)

The weighted average discount rate used in determining the actuarial
present value of the accumulated benefit obligation was 7.00%, 7.25%, and 7.50%
at December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The expected long-term rate
of return on plan assets was 9.00% at December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000.

The Company has various defined contribution retirement plans for its
domestic and certain foreign subsidiaries, including 401(k) plans, whereby
participants can contribute a portion of their salary up to certain maximums
established by the related plan documents. The Company makes matching
contributions, which are based upon the amounts contributed by employees. The
Company's matching contributions charged to operations aggregated $375, $296 and
$369 in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

Substantially all of the employees of Brink International B.V. are covered
by a union-sponsored, collectively-bargained, multi-employer defined benefit
plan. Pension expense was $1,302, $1,086 and $1,270 for the years ended December
31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

9. OPERATING LEASES

The Company leases certain equipment under leases expiring on various dates
through 2007. Future minimum annual lease payments required under leases that
have a noncancellable lease term in excess of one year at December 31, 2002 are
as follows:

2003.................................................................................... $ 2,571
2004.................................................................................... 1,986
2005.................................................................................... 1,276
2006.................................................................................... 431
2007.................................................................................... 13
-------
$ 6,277

Rental expense charged to operations was approximately $4,399, $4,069 and
$4,066 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

42

ADVANCED ACCESSORY SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT UNIT RELATED DATA)

10. ACCOUNT BALANCES

Account balances included in the consolidated balance sheets are comprised
of the following:

11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

In February 1996, the Company commenced an action against certain
individuals alleging breach of contract under the terms of an October 1992
Purchase Agreement and Employment Agreements with the predecessor of the
Company. The individuals then filed a separate lawsuit against the Company
alleging breach of contract under the respective Purchase and Employment
agreements. On May 7, 1999 a jury in the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Michigan reached a verdict against the Company and awarded
the individuals approximately $3,800 plus interest and reasonable attorney fees.
The Company is currently pursuing an appeal in the Sixth Circuit Court of
Appeals. During 2002 and 2001, the Company increased its estimated accrual for
this matter by $600 and $600, respectively, representing accrued interest for
the year which charge is included in interest expense. At December 31, 2002, the
Company had an outstanding irrevocable letter of credit totaling $8,325
benefiting the individuals. No amounts have been paid as of December 31, 2002.

The Company offers warranties to its customers depending upon the specific
product and terms of the customer purchase agreement. The majority of the
Company's product warranties are customer specific. A typical warranty program
requires that the Company replace defective products within a specified time
period from the date of sale. The Company records and estimate for future
warranty related costs based on actual historical return rates. The Company has
not experienced significant costs related to its warranties.

In early July 2002, three European automotive OEM customers of Brink Sweden
recalled in total approximately 41,000 towbars which were supplied by the
Company. The recall affects vehicles fitted with the G 3.0 model removable
towbar system sold between January 1999 and March 2000. The Company is in the
process of working with its customers to provide technical and other support in
response to the recall. During the fourth quarter of 2002, based upon
information gathered concerning the costs of the recall and from discussions
with its customers during the fourth quarter, management estimated and recorded
an expense of approximately $3,000 for the recall. The expense is included in
selling, administrative and product development expenses. At December 31, 2002
the unpaid liability for the recall totaling $2,854 was included in accrued
liabilities.

In addition to the above, the Company is party to various claims, lawsuits
and administrative proceedings related to matters arising out of the normal
course of business. Management believes that the resolution of these matters
will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of
operations or cash flows of the Company.

43

12. SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company operates in one reportable segment, providing towing and rack
systems and related accessories to the automotive OEM and aftermarket. All sales
are to unaffiliated customers. Revenues by geographic area, accumulated by the
geographic area where the revenue originated, revenues by product line and
long-lived assets, which include net property and equipment and net goodwill and
debt issuance costs, by geographic area are as follows:

The Company has two significant customers in the automotive OEM industry.
Sales to these customers represented 23% and 22% of total Company sales for the
year ended December 31, 2002, 28% and 17% for the year ended December 31, 2001,
and 32% and 11% for the year ended December 31, 2000. Accounts receivable from
these customers represented 21% and 18% of the Company's trade accounts
receivable at December 31, 2002, and 27% and 10% at December 31, 2001,
respectively.

Although the Company is directly affected by the economic well being of the
industries and customers referred to above, management does not believe
significant credit risk exists at December 31, 2002. Consistent with industry
practice, the Company does not require collateral to reduce such credit risk.

13. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING INFORMATION

On October 1, 1997, the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, AAS
Capital Corporation, issued and sold $125,000 of its 9 3/4% Senior Subordinated
Notes due 2007. The Notes are guaranteed on a full, unconditional and joint and
several basis, by all of the Company's direct and indirect wholly-owned domestic
subsidiaries. The following condensed consolidating financial information for
2002, 2001 and 2000 presents the financial position, results of operations and
cash flows of (i) the Company as parent, as if it accounted for its subsidiaries
on the equity method, and AAS Capital Corporation as issuers; (ii) guarantor
subsidiaries which are domestic, wholly-owned subsidiaries and include SportRack
LLC, AAS Holdings, Inc., Valley Industries, LLC, and ValTek LLC; and (iii) the
non-guarantor subsidiaries which are foreign, wholly-owned subsidiaries and
include Brink International B.V. and its subsidiaries, SportRack Accessories,
Inc. and its subsidiary, and SportRack Automotive, GmbH and its subsidiaries.
The operating results of the guarantor and non-guarantor subsidiaries include
management fees of $1,407 and $320, respectively, for the year ended December
31, 2002, $1,416 and $310,respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2001 and
$1,410 and $330, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2000. Since its
formation in September 1997, AAS Capital Corporation has had no operations and
has no assets or liabilities at December 31, 2002.

44

ADVANCED ACCESSORY SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT UNIT RELATED DATA)

13. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING INFORMATION -- (CONTINUED)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
DECEMBER 31, 2002

45

ADVANCED ACCESSORY SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT UNIT RELATED DATA)

13. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING INFORMATION -- (CONTINUED)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
DECEMBER 31, 2001

46

ADVANCED ACCESSORY SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT UNIT RELATED DATA)

13. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING INFORMATION -- (CONTINUED)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001

47

ADVANCED ACCESSORY SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT UNIT RELATED DATA)

13. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING INFORMATION -- (CONTINUED)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000

48

ADVANCED ACCESSORY SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT UNIT RELATED DATA)

13. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING INFORMATION -- (CONTINUED)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002

49

ADVANCED ACCESSORY SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT UNIT RELATED DATA)

13. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING INFORMATION -- (CONTINUED)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001

50

ADVANCED ACCESSORY SYSTEMS, LLC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT UNIT RELATED DATA)

13. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING INFORMATION -- (CONTINUED)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000

51

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

PART III

ITEM 10. MANAGERS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

The following table sets forth the names and ages of each of the
individuals that currently serve as a member (each, a "Board Member") of the
Company's board of managers (the "Board of Managers"), or as an executive
officers of the Company.

F. Alan Smith has served in the automotive industry for 41 years and has
been Chairman of the Board of Managers of the Company since its formation in
September 1995. He served in various assignments at General Motors from 1956 to
1992, including President of GM Canada from 1978 to 1980. He was a member of the
Board of Directors of General Motors from 1981 to 1992 and Chief Financial
Officer of General Motors from 1981 to 1988. Mr. Smith is a director of
TransPro, Inc.

Terence C. Seikel has served in the automotive industry for 19 years and
has been President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since April 15,
1999. From 1996 until April 15, 1999, Mr. Seikel served as Vice President of
Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer of the Company and
SportRack. From 1985 to 1996, Mr. Seikel was employed by Larizza Industries, a
publicly held supplier of interior trim to the automotive industry, in various
capacities including Chief Financial Officer.

Richard E. Borghi has served in the automotive industry for 35 years and
has been President and Chief Operating Officer of SportRack since April 15,
1999. From 1995 until April 15, 1999, Mr. Borghi, served as Executive Vice
President of Operations and Chief Operating Officer of SportRack. From 1988 to
1995, Mr. Borghi held various senior management positions with MascoTech, and
was the Executive Vice President of Operations of the MascoTech Division at the
time of its acquisition by the Company.

Gerrit de Graaf has been General Manager and Chief Executive Officer of
Brink since November 1996. From 1989 to 1996, Mr. de Graaf worked as a
consultant for Philips Medical Systems (a division of Philips Electronics), a
company engaged in the distribution of electronic medical equipment, and most
recently as Philips' Marketing Manager in the United States.

Bryan A. Fletcher has served in the automotive industry for 14 years and
has been President and Chief Operating Officer of Valley Aftermarket (a division
of Valley Industries, LLC) since July 2000. From 1991 until July 2000 Mr.
Fletcher served as Vice President of Aftermarket Operations of Valley.

Barry G. Steele has been Chief Financial Officer since April 1, 2002. Prior
to that Mr. Steele served as Corporate Controller and Treasurer since July 2001.
From June 1999 to July 2001 Mr. Steele was Corporate Controller of the Company.
From 1997 until June 1999, Mr. Steele served as Manager of Financial Reporting
of the Company. From 1993 to 1997, Mr. Steele was employed by Price Waterhouse
LLP.

J. Wim Rengelink has served in the automotive industry for 16 years and has
been Finance Director of Brink since 1995. From 1988 to 1995 he worked in
Brink's internal audit department.

52

Donald J. Hofmann, Jr. has been a Board Member, Vice President and
Secretary of the Company since October 1995. Since January 2003, Mr. Hofmann is
a Senior Advisor of J.P. Morgan Partners and was a partner of J.P. Morgan
Partners, LLC, or its predecessor Chase Capital Partners a global general
partnership with over $20.0 billion under management from 1992 to January, 2003.
JPMP provides equity and mezzanine debt financing for management buyouts and
recapitalizations, growth equity and venture capital. JPMP is an investment
advisor to J.P. Morgan Partners (23A SBIC), LLC, a member of the Company. Mr.
Hofmann is also a director of Pliant Corporation.

Barry Banducci has been a Board Member of the Company since October 1995.
Since September 1995, Mr. Banducci has been the Chairman of TransPro, Inc., a
supplier to the automotive OEM market and aftermarket. Prior thereto, Mr.
Banducci served in various capacities at Equion Corporation, a supplier of
automotive components, from 1983 to 1995, including President, Chief Executive
Officer and Vice Chairman. Mr. Banducci is a director of TransPro, Inc.

Gerard J. Brink has been a Board Member of the Company since October 1996.
Mr. Brink has been retired since October 1996 prior to that he was General
Manager of Brink from 1965 to 1996.

Each member of the Board of Managers holds office until his successor is
elected and qualified, or until his earlier death, resignation or removal. The
Company's officers serve at the discretion of the Board of Managers.

See the disclosures in Item 12. under the caption "Members' Agreement" for
a description of arrangements to elect Messrs. Seikel, Borghi, Smith, Banducci,
Brink, Fletcher and Hofmann as managers of the Company. See the disclosures in
Item 11. under the caption "Employment Agreements" for a description of
agreements with each of Messrs. Seikel, Borghi, de Graaf and Fletcher pursuant
to which they are required to be appointed to the executive positions they
currently hold.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation for
2000 through 2002 for the chief executive officer of the Company and the four
next most highly compensated executive officers of the Company.

- ----------

OPTION GRANTS IN 2002 AND OPTION VALUES AT YEAR END

During 2002, there were no options granted to the named executive officers.
The following table sets forth information regarding outstanding membership unit
options issued to the chief executive officer of the Company and the four next
most highly compensated executive officers.

53

AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND FY-END OPTION VALUES

- ----------

BOARD MEMBER COMPENSATION

The Board Members do not currently receive compensation for their service
on the Board of Managers or any committee thereof but are reimbursed for their
out-of-pocket expenses. In addition, Messrs. Smith and Banducci have consulting
agreements with the Company. See "Consulting Agreements."

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS

Each of Terence C. Seikel, Richard E. Borghi, Gerrit de Graaf and Bryan
Fletcher has entered into an employment agreement (collectively, the "Employment
Agreements") with the Company. Mr. Seikel's Employment Agreement provides for an
annual base salary of $250,000, subject to increases at the sole discretion of
the Board of Managers, and a bonus in the range of 50-70% of his base salary.
Mr. Borghi's Employment Agreement provides for an annual base salary of
$250,000, subject to increases at the sole discretion of the Board of Managers,
a bonus in the range of 30-50% of his base salary, and he is entitled to a one
time bonus of $100,000 at his convenience or the earlier of his termination
date, or a sale of the Company. Mr. de Graaf's Employment Agreement provides for
an annual base salary of NLG 170,000, subject to increases at the sole
discretion of the Board of Managers, and a bonus in the range of 30% to 50% of
his base salary. Mr. Fletcher's Employment Agreement provides for an annual base
salary of $150,000, subject to increases at the sole discretion of the Board of
Managers, and a bonus in the range of 30% to 50% of his base salary. The
Employment Agreements also provide for twelve months of severance pay to the
executive officer in the event such officer is terminated without cause (as
defined in the Employment Agreement). The Employment Agreements for Messrs
Seikel, Borghi and Fletcher provided for an increase in the severance pay period
to 18 months upon a change in control of the Company, as defined in the
Employment Agreement.

The Employment Agreements expire December 31, 2003 for Messrs. Seikel,
Borghi and Fletcher and automatically extend for successive two-year terms
unless terminated by the Company upon 30 days notice prior to the expiration of
the current term. The Employment Agreement for Mr. de Graaf may be terminated by
either party upon three month's prior written notice. Each Employment Agreement
prohibits the executive officer from disclosing non-public information about the
Company. The Employment Agreements also require the executive officers to assign
to the Company any designs, inventions and other related items and intellectual
property rights developed or acquired by the executive officer during the term
of his employment. In addition, for a period of five years after termination of
employment (two years if the termination is without cause) each executive
officer has agreed, in his respective Employment Agreement, not to (i) engage in
any Competitive Business (as defined in the Employment Agreements), (ii)
interfere with or disrupt any relationship between the Company and its
customers, suppliers and employees and (iii) induce any employee of the Company
to terminate his or her employment with the Company or engage in any Competitive
Business.

CONSULTING AGREEMENTS

F. Alan Smith and Barry Banducci, both members of the Board of Managers,
have each entered into consulting agreements (the "Consulting Agreements") with
the Company dated as of September 28, 2001. The Consulting Agreements each
provide for an annual consulting fee of $50,000. Either party can terminate the
Consulting Agreements upon 10 days notice. Following the termination date and
for so long as the consultant shall continue to serve on the Board of Managers
of the Company, the consultant will receive an annual board fee of no less than
10% of the aggregate purchase price for all Units of the Company acquired by
him, currently $30,000 for Mr. Smith and $25,000 for Mr. Banducci. The
Consulting Agreements prohibit Messrs. Smith and Banducci from disclosing
non-public information about the Company.

54

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

The Board of Managers has an Audit Committee consisting of Messrs. Banducci
and Smith, and a Compensation Committee consisting of Messrs. Hofmann and Smith.
Prior to August 2002, the Audit Committee consisted of Messrs. Banducci and
Brink. The Audit Committee reviews the scope and results of audits and internal
accounting controls and all other tasks performed by the independent public
accountants of the Company. The Compensation Committee determines compensation
for executive officers of the Company and administers the Company's 1995 Option
Plan. None of the members of the Compensation Committee was, during 2002, an
officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or was formerly an
officer of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, except that Mr. Smith has
been the Company's Chairman of the Board of Managers and Mr. Hofmann has been
Vice President and Secretary of the Company since its formation in September
1995. None of the Compensation Committee members had any relationship with the
Company requiring disclosure by the Company pursuant to Securities and Exchange
Commission rules regarding disclosure of related-party transactions, except that
Mr. Hofmann and Mr. Smith had the relationships with the Company described
below:

Chase Securities Inc. ("CSI"), Chase, Chase Canada and JPMP are affiliates
of J.P. Morgan Partners (23A SBIC), LLC, which owns approximately 34.44% of the
Company's issued and outstanding voting securities and currently beneficially
owns 69.0% of the Company's equity securities. CSI acted as an Initial Purchaser
in connection with the offering of Notes, for which it received customary fees.
Chase is agent bank and a lender to the Company under the U.S. Credit Facility
and has received customary fees and reimbursement of expenses in such
capacities. Chase Canada is agent bank and a lender to the Company under the
Canadian Credit Agreement and has received customary fees and reimbursement of
expenses in such capacities. Chase received its proportionate share, $6.0
million, of the repayment by the Company of $90.0 million under the U.S. Credit
Facility from the proceeds of the offering of Notes. J.P. Morgan Partners (23A
SBIC), LLC, an affiliate of JPMP and CSI, held a portion of the Senior
Subordinated Debt and received its proportionate share, $10.7 million, including
prepayment penalties of $700,000, of the repayment by the Company of such debt
from the proceeds of the offering of Notes. As a result of the offering of
Notes, such affiliate was relieved of its obligation to provide up to an
additional $20.0 million of senior subordinated debt financing. In addition, an
affiliate of CSI and JPMP purchased a portion of the Notes in connection with
the offering of Notes. Donald J. Hofmann, Jr., a Senior Advisor and former
partner of JPMP, is a member of the Board of Managers of the Company. In
addition, CSI, Chase and their affiliates participate on a regular basis in
various investment banking and commercial banking transactions for the Company
and its affiliates.

On January 1, 2000, the Company issued 3,655 of its Class A-1 Units to J.P.
Morgan Partners (23A SBIC), LLC, in exchange for 3,655 Class A Units.

On November 11, 2000 the Company issued 1,478 of its Class A-1 Units to
J.P. Morgan Partners (23A SBIC), LLC, in exchange for 1,478 Class A Units.

The Company is a party to a Consulting Agreement with F. Alan Smith, the
Chairman of the Company. See "Consulting Agreements."

55

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED MEMBER MATTERS

As of March 25, 2003, the outstanding membership interests of the Company
consisted of 14,359 Units, including 9,226 Class A Units and 5,133 Class A-1
Units. The following table sets forth certain information regarding the
beneficial ownership of the Units by (i) each person known by the Company to
beneficially own more than 5% of the Units, (ii) each manager, (iii) each
executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table in Item 11. of this
report, and (iv) all of the Company's managers and executive officers treated as
a group. To the knowledge of the Company, each of such holders of Units has sole
voting and investment power as to the Units owned unless otherwise noted.

(1) Addresses are provided only for persons beneficially owning more than
five percent of the Units.

(2) Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the
Commission and includes voting and investment power with respect to the
Units. Units subject to options or warrants currently exercisable or
exercisable within 60 days of March 25, 2002 are deemed outstanding for
purposes of computing the percentage ownership of the person holding
such options or warrants, but are not deemed outstanding for purposes
of computing the percentage of any other person.

(3) J.P. Morgan Partners(23A SBIC), LLC is an affiliate of JPMP. Includes
501 Units subject to warrants exercisable within 60 days. Includes
5,133 Class A-1 non voting Units that are immediately convertible into
Class A voting Units.

(4) Includes 332 Units subject to options exercisable within 60 days. 300
Units are owned by the F. Alan Smith Family Limited Partnership.

(5) Includes 465 Units subject to options exercisable within 60 days.

(6) Includes 432 Units subject to options exercisable within 60 days.

(7) Includes 39 Units subject to options exercisable within 60 days.

(8) Includes 25 Units subject to options exercisable within 60 days.

(9) Includes 250 Units subject to options exercisable within 60 days. 250
Units are owned by the Banducci Family, LLC.

(10) Such person may be deemed the beneficial owner of the Units held by
J.P. Morgan Partners (23A SBIC), LLC due to his status as Senior
Advisor to JPMP and Attorney-in-Fact for J.P. Morgan Partners (23A
SBIC), LLC and its majority member, of J.P. Morgan Partners (23A SBIC
Manager), Inc. Mr. Hofmann disclaims beneficial ownership of the Units
held by J.P. Morgan Partners (23A SBIC), LLC except to the extent of
his pecuniary interest therein which is not readily determinable
because it is subject to several variables including without limitation
the internal rates of return and vesting of interest in J.P. Morgan
Partners (23A SBIC), LLC.

(11) Includes 2,044 Units subject to options exercisable within 60 days.

For a description of a potential change in control of the Company, see Item
1 "Business - General".

MEMBERS' AGREEMENT

As of September 30, 1999, the Company and the members entered into the
Third Amended and Restated Members' Agreement, setting forth the relative voting
rights of the members in the election of the Board of Managers. The Board of
Managers consists of between six and eleven members, as designated by persons
holding more than fifty percent of the voting Units held by J.P. Morgan Partners
(23A SBIC), LLC, an affiliate of JPMP and its affiliates (defined in the Third
Amended and Restated Members' Agreement as the "Chase Members"). The voting
provisions apportion the Board of Managers among the Chase Members and all other
members in the following way:

56

o for so long as Terence C. Seikel and Richard E. Borghi are employed by
the Company, each shall be a manager;

o as to each of F. Alan Smith and Barry Banducci, for so long as their
respective affiliates, as defined in the Third Amended and Restated
Members' Agreement, continue to hold 80% of the Units they acquired on
September 28, 1995, each shall be a manager;

o so long as Gerard Jacobus Brink, Koop Brink and Jan Willem Brink, along
with certain affiliated persons or entities, continue to own at least
80% of the Units they acquired on October 30, 1996, persons controlling
a majority of their voting Units may designate a manager from among the
Brinks or their affiliates, who is currently Gerard J. Brink;

o so long as Robert L. Fisher and Roger T. Morgan, along with certain
affiliated persons or entities, continue to own at least 80% of the
Units they acquired on August 5, 1997, persons controlling a majority
of their voting Units may designate one manager, who is currently Bryan
A. Fletcher; and

o the Chase Members designate the remaining managers, one of which shall
be a representative of J.P. Morgan Partners (23A SBIC), LLC, who is
currently Donald J. Hofmann, Jr.

J.P. Morgan Partners (23A SBIC), LLC has the right to remove any or all of the
members of the Board of Managers if:

o it reasonably believes circumstances exist that require it to assume
control of the Company in order to protect its investment in the
Company;

o in its reasonable opinion, the Company shall have committed a breach or
be in default of any covenant, obligation, agreement, representation or
warranty given or made by the Company in certain agreements or
contracts;

o in its reasonable opinion, there has been a substantial change in the
Company's operations, products or prospects during the two-year period
prior to such determination; and

o it determines that it is permitted under any applicable law to take
control of the Company and determines that it is in its best interests
to do so.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following information is provided as of December 31, 2002 with
respect to compensation plans, including individual compensation arrangements,
under with our equity securities are authorized for issuance:

- ----------
(1) These plans consists of (1) the Advanced Accessory Systems LLC 1995 Option
Plan, and (2) warrants granted to J.P. Morgan Partners (23A SBIC), LLC and
International Mezzanine Capital, B.V.

57

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

See Item 11. under the caption "Compensation Committee Interlocks and
Insider Participation" for a description of transactions between the Company and
entities with which Donald J. Hofmann, Jr., a manager of the Company, and Senior
Advisor of J.P. Morgan Partners (23A SBIC), LLC, a member beneficially owning
69.0% of our Units, are affiliated.

The Company is a party to the Consulting Agreements with F. Alan Smith, the
Chairman of the Company, and Barry Banducci, a manager of the Company. See Item
11. "Executive Compensation -- Consulting Agreements."

In connection with the acquisition of the MascoTech Division by the
Company, the Company loaned Mr. Borghi, the President and Chief Operating
Officer of SportRack and a manager of the Company, $100,000 to enable him to
make his initial equity investments in the Company. The loan bears interest at
6.2% and is due on demand.

ITEM 14. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including
our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the Company has
evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure
controls and procedures within 90 days of the filing date of this annual report,
and based on their evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal
financial officer have concluded that these controls and procedures are
effective. There were no significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of
their evaluation.

Disclosure controls and procedures are the Company's controls and other
procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed
by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified
in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms. Disclosure controls
and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company
files under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management,
including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

58

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a) The following documents are filed as part of this Form 10-K:

1. Financial Statements:

A list of the Consolidated Financial Statements, related notes and
Report of Independent Accountants is set forth in Item 8 of this report on Form
10-K.

2. Financial Statement Schedules:

Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable
accounting regulations of the Commission are not required under the related
instructions, are inapplicable, are not material, or the information called for
thereby is otherwise included in the financial statements and, therefore, have
been omitted.

3. Index to Exhibits:

Each management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement filed as
an exhibit to this report is identified in this index to exhibits with an
asterisk before the exhibit number.

(b) Reports of form 8-K:

On March 14, 2003, the Company filed a report on Form 8-K to announce
that it was in the late stages of negotiations for the sale of the Company to
Castle Harlan, Inc.

- ----------

61

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. Advanced Accessory
Systems, LLC

Date: March 25, 2003 By: /s/ TERENCE C. SEIKEL
--------------------------------------
Terence C. Seikel

President and Chief Executive Officer
(Authorized Signatory)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
this report has been signed below, by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

62

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Terence C. Seikel, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Advanced Accessory
Systems, LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual
report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 25, 2003

/s/ Terence C. Seikel
-----------------------------------
Terence C. Seikel, President and
Chief Executive Officer

63

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Barry G. Steele, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Advanced Accessory
Systems, LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual
report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 25, 2003

/s/ Barry G. Steele
-----------------------------------
Barry G. Steele, Chief
Financial Officer

64

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO BE FURNISHED WITH REPORTS FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION
15(d) OF THE ACT BY REGISTRANTS WHICH HAVE NOT REGISTERED SECURITIES PURSUANT TO
SECTION 12 OF THE ACT.

Other than this annual report filed on Form 10-K, no annual report or proxy
material has been sent to security holders.

65

ADVANCED ACCESSORY SYSTEMS, LLC-
SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000,
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)

- ----------

(1) Charges to other accounts include amounts related to acquired companies
and the effects of changing foreign currency exchange rates for the Company's
foreign subsidiaries.

66