Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10–Q

QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002                                                                                     Commission File No.: 0-27740

CITIZENS FIRST FINANCIAL CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

2101 North Veterans Parkway, Bloomington, Illinois 61704
(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number: (309) 661-8700

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for past 90 days.

(1)    Yes  x  No
(2)    Yes  x  No

The Registrant had 1,465,983 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of October 31, 2002.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Statements contained in this Form 10-Q which are not historical facts are forward-looking statements, as that term is described in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The forward-looking statements are generally identifiable by the use of such words as “believes”, “expects”, “anticipates”, “estimates”, “projects”, “intends” or similar expressions. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risk and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. Such risks and uncertainties include potential change in interest rates, competitive factors in the financial services industry, general and local economic conditions, the effect of new legislation and other risks detailed in documents filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time.

Table of Contents

PART I. — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Citizens First Financial Corp. and Subsidiary
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
As of September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001
(in thousands)

         See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

1

Table of Contents

Citizens First Financial Corp. and Subsidiary
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income

         See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

2

Table of Contents

Citizens First Financial Corp. and Subsidiary
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income

         See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

3

Table of Contents

CITIZENS FIRST FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

4

Table of Contents

5

Table of Contents

Citizens First Financial Corp.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

1.     Background Information

Citizens First Financial Corp. (the “Company”) was incorporated in January 1996 and on May 1, 1996 acquired all of the outstanding shares of common stock of Citizens Savings Bank (the “Bank”) upon the Bank’s conversion from a federally chartered mutual savings bank to a federally chartered stock savings bank. The Company purchased 100% of the outstanding capital stock of the Bank using 50% of the net proceeds from the Company’s initial stock offering which was completed on May 1, 1996. In April 1999, the Bank was converted from a federally chartered savings bank to an Illinois state savings bank.

The Company sold 2,817,500 shares of common stock in the initial offering at $10.00 per share, including 225,400 shares purchased by the Bank’s Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the “ESOP”). The ESOP shares were acquired by the Bank with proceeds from a Company loan totaling $2,254,000. The net proceeds of the offering totaled $27,012,000; $28,175,000 less $1,163,000 in underwriting commissions and other expenses. The Company’s stock is traded on the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol “CFSB”.

2.     Statement of Information Furnished

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Form 10-Q instructions and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X, and in the opinion of management reflect all adjustments necessary to present a fair statement of the consolidated financial position as of September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, and the consolidated statements of income and cash flows for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001. All adjustments to the financial statements were of a normal recurring nature. These results have been determined on the basis of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The results of operations for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2002 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire fiscal year.

The condensed consolidated financial statements are those of the Company and the Bank. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto, dated January 30, 2002, included in the Company’s 2001 Annual Report to Shareholders.

3.     Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share have been computed based upon the weighted average common shares outstanding for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the Company.

4.     Current Accounting Issues

In July, 2001, SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations” was issued. SFAS No. 143 establishes standards for accounting and reporting of obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and associated asset retirement costs. SFAS No. 143 is effective for years beginning after June 15, 2002. Management does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on the Company.

In October 2001, SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” was issued. Under SFAS No. 144, long-lived assets to be sold within one year must be separately identified and carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value less costs to sell.

6

Table of Contents

Long-lived assets expected to be held longer than one year are subject to depreciation and must be written down to fair value upon impairment. Long-lived assets no longer expected to be sold within one year, such as foreclosed real estate, must be written down to the lower of current fair value or fair value at the date of foreclosure adjusted to reflect depreciation since acquisition. SFAS No. 144 was implemented by the Company in January 2002. The adoption of this statement did not have an impact on the Company.

7

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

GENERAL

Citizens First Financial Corp. (the “Company”) is the holding company for Citizens Savings Bank (the “Bank”). The Bank was originally chartered in 1888 by the State of Illinois and in 1989 became a federally chartered savings bank. The Bank’s principal business consists of the acceptance of retail deposits from the general public in the area surrounding its main and branch offices and the investment of these deposits, together with funds generated from operations and borrowings into loans and investment securities. The Bank originates one-to-four family residential mortgages, commercial, multi-family, construction and land, commercial real estate, agricultural, consumer and other loans. The Bank has a wholly-owned service corporation, CSL Service Corporation (“CSL”), which is an Illinois-chartered corporation that has invested in Williamsburg LLC (“Williamsburg”), a real estate development joint venture. CSL is a 50% owner of Williamsburg, which has two other investors. The accounts of Williamsburg are consolidated into the Company’s financial statements. The 50% of Williamsburg not owned by CSL is recorded as a minority interest.

COMPARISON OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2002 and DECEMBER 31, 2001

Total assets increased from $340.8 million at December 31, 2001 to $352.2 million at September 30, 2002. The $11.4 million or 3.3% increase was primarily due to the increase in interest-bearing demand deposits, which is included in cash and cash equivalents, available for sale securities, partially offset by a decline in loans.

Cash and cash equivalents increased from $12.9 million at December 31, 2001 to $19.5 million at September 30, 2002 an increase of $6.6 million or 51.2%. This increase resulted from an increase in deposits and borrowings.

Available for sale securities increased from $15.7 million at December 31, 2001 to $22.6 million at September 30, 2002, an increase of $6.9 million or 43.9%. The increase was primarily due to the purchase of investment securities during the first nine months of 2002.

Loans, net of allowance for loan losses and including loans held for sale, decreased from $293.8 million at December 31, 2001 to $291.1 million at September 30, 2002, a decrease of $2.7 million or 0.9%.

The Company maintains an allowance for loan losses to absorb losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The allowance for losses increased from $2,421,000 at December 31, 2001 to $2,621,000 at September 30, 2002, an increase of $200,000 or 8.3%. An allowance for possible loan losses is established based on management’s best judgment, which involves a continuing review of prevailing national and local economic conditions, changes in the size and composition of the portfolio and review of individual problem credits. Growth of the loan portfolio, loss experience, economic conditions, delinquency levels, credit mix, and selected credits are factors that affect judgments concerning the adequacy of the allowance. Actual losses on loans are charged against the allowance.

8

Table of Contents

Non-performing loans, which are loans which are past due 90 days or more, and non-accruing loans, decreased from $5,790,000 at December 31, 2001 to $3,526,000 at September 30, 2002, a decrease of $2,264,000 or 39.1%. The ratio of the Company’s allowance for loan losses to total non-performing loans was 74.3% and 41.8% at September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, respectively.

Loans delinquent greater than 90 days and still accruing interest, decreased from $2,613,000 at December 31, 2001 to $1,377,000 at September 30, 2002, a decrease of $1,236,000. The collateral for these loans is primarily 1-4 family mortgages. The decrease was primarily attributable to the repayment of $1,057,000 in loans to one commercial borrower.

Non-accruing loans decreased from $3,177,000 at December 31, 2001 to $2,149,000 at September 30, 2002, a decrease of $1,028,000. As of September 30, 2002, $1,534,000 of the total non-accruing loans pertains to two borrowers. The first borrower, with loans for $1,045,000, is a developer, which had $4.2 million in loans with the Company for the development of 27 residential properties. In August 2000, the developer filed for bankruptcy protection. A bankruptcy trustee is handling the disposition of the developer’s assets. During 2000, the Company charged off $2.8 million of the loans outstanding to the developer. Subsequent to September 30, 2002, the bank received an additional payment of $942,000 from the bankruptcy trustee for this loan, leaving a balance of $103,000. Based on the assets held by the trustee and the Company’s expected portion of these remaining assets, management believes that there will be no additional losses relative to the developer. The second borrower is a developer with $489,000 in loans. The collateral for these loans are single-family homes and residential lots. The Bank has established a loss reserve of $120,000 for these loans. Based on the value of the collateral, management believes that an adequate loss reserve has been established for these loans. The remaining non-accrual loans, with a balance of $615,000, consist primarily of $173,000 of real estate construction loans and $321,000 of 1-4 family real estate loans. For all of the non-accrual loans, the Company believes that it has adequately reserve for any potential loss. The decrease in non-accrual loans was primarily due to the foreclosure and disposition of approximately $700,000 of loans to a contractor that had been classified as non-accrual at December 31, 2001 and the receipt from the bankruptcy trustee of approximately $590,000 in partial payment on the loans to the borrower discussed above.

9

Table of Contents

Potential problem loans decreased from $4,941,000 at December 31, 2001 to $4,052,000 at September 30, 2002, a decrease of $889,000. As of September 30, 2002, the total relates to two borrowers. A borrower with a commercial mortgage for a retail development and a residential contractor have potential problem loans of $3,334,000 and $718,000, respectively. At September 30, 2002, the loan for the retail development is not delinquent. The building that serves as the Company’s collateral is leased and, in addition, the borrower has personally guaranteed the loan. During the third quarter of 2002, the borrower filed a lawsuit for the removal of the personal guarantee from this loan. Another financial institution has initiated foreclosure proceedings on loans related to the same retail development. The Bank has established a loss reserve of $500,000 for this loan. Based on the value of the collateral, management believes that an adequate loss reserve has been established for this loan. The loans to the residential contractor are current. However, due to previous payment problems with this borrower these loans have been classified as potential problem loans. The Bank has established a reserve of $137,000 for the loans to the residential contractor. Based on the value of the collateral and the borrower’s income, management does not anticipate additional losses on these loans.

Land in real estate joint venture decreased from $1,081,000 at December 31, 2001 to $1,021,000 at September 30, 2002, a decrease of $60,000 or 5.6%. The decrease was due to sales of property offset by capital improvements to the real estate development.

Foreclosed real estate increased from $618,000 at December 31, 2001 to $1,925,000 at September 30, 2002, an increase of $1,307,000 or 211.5%. The balance is comprised of primarily 1-4 family residences. Properties being transferred to foreclosed assets are appraised or evaluated and, if required, loss reserves are established by management.

Mortgage servicing rights decreased from $787,000 at December 31, 2001 to $375,000 at September 30, 2002, a decrease of $412,000 or 52.4%. The decrease was due to the amortization of $204,000 of mortgage servicing rights and an identified impairment of $323,000, offset by newly capitalized assets of $115,000. The amortization and impairment were a result of increased prepayment speeds due to decreases in interest rates. The decline in long-term interest rates resulted in an increase in the projected rate at which loans serviced for others are expected to prepay, thereby shortening their expected lives. When the mortgage servicing rights were valued in the current environment with shorter lives, the assets had less value, and an impairment was identified. The impairment of $323,000 was charged against current earnings. At September 30, 2002 loans serviced for others included $96.5 million in one-to-four family residential mortgages.

Deposits increased from $236.6 million at December 31, 2001 to $243.3 million at September 30, 2002, an increase of $6.7 million or 2.8%. The increase was primarily due to an increase of $8.2 million in money market deposits. During the period of low interest rates and stock market volatility in 2002, customers preferred the liquidity and stability of the money market account.

Long-term debt increased from $69.6 million at December 31, 2001 to $73.4 million at September 30, 2002, an increase of $3.8 million or 5.5%.

Total stockholders’ equity increased by $1.1 million or 3.6%, from $30.9 million at December 31, 2001 to $32.0 million at September 30, 2002. The increase resulted from the earnings of the Company of $1,776,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, the recognition of ESOP shares of $416,000, exercised stock options of $162,000, offset by the purchase of treasury shares of $889,000 and the payment of $315,000 in dividends to shareholders.

10

Table of Contents

COMPARISON OF OPERATING RESULTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002 and SEPTEMBER 30, 2001

GENERAL

Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 increased by $172,000 or 10.7%, from $1,604,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 to $1,776,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. The increase was primarily due to an increase in net interest income offset by an increase in the provision for loan losses and an impairment charge for mortgage servicing rights.

INTEREST INCOME

Interest on loans decreased by $1,745,000 or 10.0%, from $17,473,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 to $15,728,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. Interest on loans decreased due to a 90 basis point decrease in the average yield on loans offset by a $4.8 million increase in the average balance of loans.

Interest on investments decreased from $1,215,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 to $1,139,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, a decrease of $76,000 or 6.3%. The decrease was due to a 257 basis point decrease in the average yield of interest-bearing demand deposits, FHLB stock and investment securities in 2002 offset by a $13.8 million increase in the average balance of these investments.

INTEREST EXPENSE

Interest on deposits decreased by $2,686,000 or 31.1%, from $8,645,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 to $5,959,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. The decrease was due to a 170 basis point decrease in the average cost of deposits offset by a $8.4 million increase in the average balance of deposits.

Interest on long-term debt increased by $22,000 or 0.8%, from $2,677,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 to $2,699,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. There was an 82 basis point decrease in the average cost of borrowing offset by a $10.1 million increase in the average balance of long-term debt.

PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES

The provision for loan losses increased to $725,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, from $540,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2001, an increase of $185,000 or 34.3%. The provision for both periods reflects management’s analysis of the Company’s loan portfolio based on information, which is currently available to it at such time. In particular, management considers the level of non-performing loans and potential problem loans. While management believes that the allowance for loan losses is sufficient based on information currently available, no assurances can be made that future events or conditions or regulatory directives will not result in increased provisions for loan losses or additions to the Bank’s allowance for losses which may adversely affect net income.

NONINTEREST INCOME

Total noninterest income decreased by $542,000 or 29.2%, from $1,858,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 to $1,316,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease of $58,000 in net loan sale gains, a $323,000 mortgage servicing rights impairment, a decrease of $72,000 in gains on sale of land in joint venture and a $71,000 net realized loss on the sale of available for sale securities in 2002. The mortgage servicing rights impairment was due to the high level of mortgage loan prepayment activity in 2002.

NONINTEREST EXPENSE

Total noninterest expense decreased by $165,000 or 2.7%, from $6,062,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 to $5,897,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. The decrease was primarily attributable to a $39,000 decrease in the minority interest in net income of a real estate joint venture, a $42,000 decrease in salaries and employee benefits due to the completion in 2001 of an employee stock-based incentive program and a $92,000 decrease in other noninterest expense primarily due to a $60,000 decrease in other professional fees.

11

Table of Contents

INCOME TAX EXPENSE

Total income tax expense was $1,127,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, compared to $1,018,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. The increase is attributable to an increase in taxable income for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. The effective tax rate was 38.8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001.

COMPARISON OF OPERATING RESULTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002 and SEPTEMBER 30, 2001

GENERAL

Net income for the three months ended September 30, 2002 decreased by $77,000 from $456,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2001 to $379,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2002. The decrease was due primarily to the $76,000 change in the net gains on loan sales, an impairment of mortgage servicing rights of $323,000, and a $315,000 increase in the provision for loan losses offset by a $372,000 increase in net interest income and increased net income from the real estate joint venture.

INTEREST INCOME

Interest on loans decreased by $566,000 or 10.0%, from $5,687,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2001 to $5,121,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2002. Interest on loans decreased due to a decrease in the average yield on loans outstanding of 81 basis points offset by $2.6 million increase in the average balance of outstanding loans.

Interest on investments increased from $407,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2001 to $423,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2002, an increase of $16,000 or 3.9%. The increase was due to a $12.9 million increase in the average balance of investment securities, FHLB stock and interest-bearing deposits offset by a 196 basis point decrease in the average yield of these assets in 2002.

INTEREST EXPENSE

Interest on deposits decreased by $953,000 or 33.8%, from $2,820,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2001 to $1,867,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2002. The decrease was primarily due to a 188 basis point decrease in the average cost of deposits, offset by a $4.2 million increase in the average balance of deposits.

The interest on long-term debt increased by $31,000 or 3.5%, from $877,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2001 to $908,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2002 as a result of a $9.7 million increase in average borrowings, offset by a 74 basis point decrease in the average cost of borrowings.

PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES

The provision for loan losses was $495,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2002 and $180,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2001, an increase of $315,000 or 175.0%. The increase was primarily to reserve for additional anticipated losses on loans to borrowers that had previously been identified as substandard.

NONINTEREST INCOME

Total noninterest income decreased by $291,000 or 44.3%, from $656,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2001 to $365,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2002. The decrease was due primarily to a decrease in gains on loan sales and the impairment of mortgage servicing rights. Net gains on loan sales decreased by $76,000. The $323,000 impairment of mortgage servicing rights was due to a high level of mortgage loan prepayment activity in the third quarter of 2002. Other noninterest income decreased primarily due to decreased sold loan servicing fees.

12

Table of Contents

NONINTEREST EXPENSES

Total noninterest expense decreased from $2,127,000 for the three moths ended September 30, 2001 to $2,019,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2002, a decrease of $108,000 or 5.1%. The decrease was primarily attributable to decreases for the three months ended September 30, 2002 of $79,000 in salaries and employee benefits expenses and $53,000 in net occupancy and equipment expenses.

INCOME TAX EXPENSE

Total income tax expense was $241,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2002, compared to $290,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2001, a decrease of $49,000 or 16.9%. The decrease was attributable to the decreased taxable income for the three months ended September 30, 2002. The effective tax rate was 38.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001.

13

Table of Contents

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The notes to the consolidated financial statements contain a summary of the Company’s significant accounting policies, including significant estimates, presented on pages 23 through 25 of the Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2001. Certain of these policies are important for the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition, since they require management to make difficult, complex or subjective judgments, some of which may relate to matters that are inherently uncertain. Management believes that its critical accounting policies and significant estimates include determining the allowance for loan losses, the valuation of loan servicing rights and the valuation of foreclosed real estate.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is a significant estimate that can and does change based on management’s assumptions about specific borrowers and current general and economic and business conditions, among other factors. Management reviews the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses on at least a quarterly basis. The evaluation by management includes consideration of past loss experience, changes in the composition of the loan portfolio, the current economic condition and amount of loans outstanding, identified problem loans and the probability of collecting all amounts due.

The determination of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is based on estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant changes in the economic environment and market conditions. A worsening or protracted economic decline would increase the likelihood of additional losses due to credit and market risk and could create the need for additional loss reserves.

Mortgage Servicing Rights

The Company recognizes the rights to service loans as separate assets in the consolidated balance sheet. The total cost of loans when sold is allocated between loans and loan servicing rights based on the relative fair value of each. Mortgage servicing rights are subsequently carried at the lower of the initial carrying value, adjusted for amortization or fair value. Mortgage servicing rights are evaluated for impairment based on the fair value of those rights. Factors included in the calculation of fair value of the loan servicing rights include estimating the present value of future net cash flows, market loan prepayment speeds for similar loans, discount rates, servicing costs, and other economic factors. Servicing rights are amortized over the estimated period of net servicing revenue. It is likely that these economic factors will change over the life of the mortgage servicing rights, resulting in different valuations of the mortgage servicing rights. The differing valuations will affect the carrying value of the mortgage servicing rights on the consolidated balance sheet as well as the income recorded from mortgage servicing in the income statement. As of September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, mortgage servicing rights had carrying values of $375,000 and $761,000, respectively, net of valuation allowances of $323,000 and $-0-, respectively.

Foreclosed Real Estate

Foreclosed real estate is carried at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated selling costs. Management estimates the fair value of the properties based on current appraisal information. Fair value estimates are particularly susceptible to significant changes in the economic environment, market conditions, and the real estate market. A worsening or protracted economic decline would increase the likelihood of a decline in property values and could create the need to write down the properties through current operations.

14

Table of Contents

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Company’s primary sources of funds are deposits, principal and interest payments on loans and securities, sales of loans and securities and FHLB advances. While maturing and scheduled amortization of loans are predictable sources of funds, deposit outflows and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition. The Bank’s liquidity requirement, which may be varied at the direction of the Bank’s regulators depending on economic conditions and deposit flows, is based upon a percentage of the Bank’s deposits and short-term borrowings.

At September 30, 2002, the Bank exceeded all of its regulatory capital requirements with Tier 1 capital of $30.4 million, or 8.8% of average total assets, which is above the required level of $13.8 million or 4.0%; and risk-based capital of $33.0 million or 13.4% of risk-weighted assets, which is above the required level of $19.7 million or 8.0%.

The Company’s most liquid assets are cash and interest-bearing demand accounts. The level of these accounts is dependent on the operating, financing, lending and investing activities during any given period. At September 30, 2002 cash and interest-bearing deposits totaled $19.5 million.

The Company has other sources of liquidity if a need for additional funds arises, including FHLB advances, loan sales, brokered deposits and Fed funds. At September 30, 2002, the Bank had outstanding advances with the FHLB of $69.2 million. The FHLB maintains two limitations on borrowing availability based on (1) FHLB stock ownership and (2) total assets. The Bank currently meets the stock limitation; however, this limit may be raised by the purchase of additional FHLB stock. Based on the total assets limitations, the Bank may increase its borrowings with the FHLB by approximately $52.1 million. The ability to borrow this amount would require meeting regulatory mandated loan and collateral limits. Depending upon market conditions and the pricing of deposit products and FHLB borrowings, the Bank may utilize FHLB advances to fund loan originations.

At September 30, 2002 the Bank had commitments to originate loans and unused lines of credit totaling $29.1 million. Certificate accounts which are scheduled to mature in one year or less from September 30, 2002 totaled $107.7 million. The Bank anticipates that it will have sufficient funds to meet its current commitments and maturing deposits.

15

Table of Contents

Item 3: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Sources of market risk include interest rate risk, foreign currency exchange rate risk, commodity price risk and equity price risk. The Company is only subject to interest rate risk. The Company purchased no financial instruments for trading purposes during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001.

The principal objective of the Company’s interest rate risk management function is to evaluate the interest rate risk included in balance sheet accounts, determine the level of risk appropriate given the Company’s business strategy, operating environment, capital and liquidity requirements and performance objectives, and manage the risk consistent with Board of Director approved guidelines. Through such management, the Company seeks to reduce the vulnerability of its operations to changes in interest rates. The Company monitors its interest rate risk as such risk relates to its operating strategies. The Company’s Board of Directors reviews the Company’s interest rate risk position on a quarterly basis. The Company’s Asset/Liability Committee is comprised of the Company’s senior management under the direction of the Board of Directors, with the Committee responsible for reviewing with the Board of Directors its activities and strategies, the effect of those strategies on the Company’s net interest margin, the market value of the portfolio and the effect that changes in the interest rates will have on the Company’s portfolio and its exposure limits. The extent of the movement of interest rates is an uncertainty that could have a negative impact on the earnings of the Company.

In recent years, the Company has utilized the following strategies to manage interest rate risk: (1) originating for investment adjustable-rate residential mortgage and fixed-rate one-to-four family loans with maturities of 10 years or less; (2) generally selling fixed-rate one-to-four family loans with maturities exceeding 10 years in the secondary market without recourse and on a servicing retained basis; (3) increasing its origination of shorter term and/or adjustable rate commercial loans; and (4) investing in shorter term investment securities which may generally bear lower yields as compared to longer term investments, but which may better position the Company for increases in market interest rates.

The Company’s interest rate and market risk profile has not materially changed from the year ended December 31, 2001. Please refer to the Company’s 2001 Form 10-K for further discussion of the Company’s market and interest rate risk.

16

Table of Contents

Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

	(a)		Disclosure controls and procedures. Within 90 days before filing this report, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Our disclosure controls and procedures are the controls and other procedures that we designed to ensure that we record, process, summarize and report in a timely manner the information we must disclose in reports that we file with or submit to the SEC. C. William Landefeld, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Dallas G. Smiley, our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, reviewed and participated in this evaluation. Based on this evaluation, Messrs. Landefeld and Smiley concluded that, as of the date of their evaluation, our disclosure controls were effective.
	(b)		Internal controls. Since the date of the evaluation described above, there have not been any significant changes in our internal accounting controls or in other factors that could significantly affect those controls.

17

Table of Contents

PART II. — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

	The Company is not involved in any legal proceedings of a material nature at this time other than those occurring in the ordinary course of business, which in the aggregate involve amounts which are believed by management to be immaterial to the financial condition of the Company.

Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds

                  Not applicable.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

                  Not applicable.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

                  Not applicable

Item 5. Other Information

                  Not applicable.

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

                  a. Exhibits

			11.0 Statement re: Computation of Per Share Earnings (filed herewith)
			99.1 Certification of C. William Landefeld
			99.2 Certification of Dallas G. Smiley

                  b. Reports on Form 8-K

                           Citizens First Financial Corp. filed the following Form 8-K during the quarter ended September 30, 2002: None

18

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

19

Table of Contents

CERTIFICATIONS

I, C. William Landefeld, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

	1.		I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Citizens First Financial Corp.;
	2.		Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
	3.		Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
	4.		The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

		a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
		b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
		c)	presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

		a)	all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
		b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

6.

The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

20

Table of Contents

I, Dallas G. Smiley, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

	7.		I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Citizens First Financial Corp.;
	8.		Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
	9.		Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
	10.		The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

		d)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
		e)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
		f)	presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

11.

The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

		c)	all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
		d)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

12.

The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

21

Table of Contents

Exhibit Index

22