Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

United States Securities And Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

	Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
	For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000.

	Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
	For the transition period from_______ to _______ .

Commission File Number 0-12728

INTEGRAL VISION, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (248) 471-2660

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, No Par Value, Stated Value $.20 Per Share
(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for at least the past 90 days. YES      NO

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (ss.229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of February 28, 2001:

Common Stock, No Par Value, Stated Value $.20 Per Share — $2,781,746

The number of shares outstanding on each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of February 28, 2001:

Common Stock, No Par Value, Stated Value $.20 Per Share — 9,029,901

Documents Incorporated By Reference: Portions of the proxy statement for the annual shareholders meeting to be held May 23, 2001 are incorporated by reference into Part III.

1

Part I

ITEM 1. Business

General

			On June 30, 1999, the Company sold the assets of its Welding Controls division. As a result of the sale, the Company changed its name to Integral Vision. “Integral Vision” (or the “Company”), formerly known as Medar, Inc., is a Michigan corporation incorporated in 1978. Integral Vision develops, manufactures and markets microprocessor-based process monitoring and control systems for use in industrial manufacturing environments. The principle applications for the Company’s products include optical inspection systems and general purpose vision software and applications thereof (collectively “machine vision products”). The Company’s products are generally sold as capital goods. Depending on the application, machine vision systems have an indefinite life. Machine vision applications are more likely to require replacement due to possible technological obsolescence rather than physical wear.
			Sales of machine vision products are effected through Integral Vision and through Integral Vision LTD., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, located in Bedford, England.

Overview

			Integral Vision is a supplier of machine vision systems and applications development software used to ensure product quality during the manufacturing process.
			Machine vision has become a necessity for manufacturers who need to continually improve production efficiency to meet the increasing demand for high quality products. The Company’s vision systems automatically identify, gauge or inspect parts with speed and accuracy. Quantitative information about each part is evaluated to check for functional or cosmetic defects. Our systems can be configured to statistically monitor the production process and send data to other equipment in the manufacturing cell. Such data could be used for example, by a diverter to send defective parts to a reject bin, or by process controllers to automatically adjust process variables.
			Target markets for our turnkey systems include the small flat panel display, optical disc, print, and packaging industries. Applications development software, such as our Industrial Vision Controller(IVC) technology, can be applied to an extensive array of applications in industries that run the gamut from aerospace to medical to textiles, and everything in between.

Products

			Optical Disc Inspection Compact disc inspection is considered an integral part of the replication process. Product quality has become an ever-growing concern among disc manufacturers during the evolution from CDs to DVDs and recordable media. Integral Vision has been serving the inspection needs of the optical disc inspection industry for over 12 years. During this time, we have seen many changes in the industry, including smaller in-line systems, faster production speeds, multiple inspections and many different disc formats. We have addressed these issues and much more with the introduction of our Series 2000 family of products.
			The Series 2000 is the latest generation of Integral Vision’s optical disc inspection products. The series features systems designed for all stages of the production process, including replication, printing and packaging. We have upgraded our electronic and optical components, designing products with reliability, low maintenance and ease of use in mind. The Series 2000 family of products includes the OMNI, CDiD, CDiP, and CDiA.

2

Table of Contents

	Omni is the base inspection scanner system for all disc formats, consisting of a CPU, monitor, keyboard, optics and software. Users can add optical inspection channels to customize the OMNI to inspect the DVD, recordable and rewritable media. The OMNI is intended for easy integration into any replication line.

	CDiD safeguards against mixed product by verifying disc orientation codes during any stage of the production process. The system performs optical character verification (OCV), bar code reading, Show & Go or any combination of the above.

	CDiP is designed for monitoring the consistency of printed labels on optical discs. CDiP controls print quality in screen, offset and pad printing technologies.

	CDiA is designed for use on the in-feed of an automatic sleeving machine. The system provides rotational information to guarantee all discs are packaged in the exact same manner.

			InteliCheck The InteliCheck product line monitors the consistency of label printing, at the printing stage itself, or as the printed labels are being applied to product packaging. Consisting of a CPU, optical head and optional industrial cabinet, InteliCheck operates on-line to control print quality objectively and accurately.
			InteliCheck monitors print quality for the screen, offset, pad printing and hot foil stamping technologies. Once an operator has completed the required production set up for a label, the vision system is trained to recognize the label print and registration using good sample labels. InteliCheck inspects each label as it is produced and can reject the label print quality and the quality of application if either fails to meet manufacturing specifications.
			InteliCheck can detect typographical, batch/lot coding, color, or other label defects and can reject any label that is torn, creased or misaligned. This system is available for both color and monochrome label inspection of flat or oval products, or with a specially designed optical head for the inspection of cylindrical products.
			Small Flat Panel Display Inspection Integral Vision has over five years of experience in the display industry, with over 300 systems installed worldwide. Our initial product, LCI-Professional, is used for inspection of LCD Displays as components or final assemblies. Applications include cell phones, car radios, pagers, electronic organizers and hand-held video games. Integral Vision’s display inspection systems are designed to detect two classes of defects: cosmetic and functional. Cosmetic defects do not affect the functionality of the display, but they cause user annoyance and reduce product value. Functional defects are flaws that cause the device to be inoperable or have a significant effect on functionality.
			In addition to our LCI Professional, we have recently begun delivering systems capable of inspecting LCOS (Liquid Crystal on Silicon) and other microdisplay devices. These technologies are applied to consumer products such as camcorders, rear projection computer monitors, digital still cameras, HDTV, projectors, video headsets and video telephones.
			Other The InCase M2000 is a powerful, configurable, automatic inspection system designed to monitor the “in case” bottle filling process. The system is designed to accommodate multiple “check stations” connected to a single processor, enabling cartons to be inspected before and after the filling process, if required. The InCase system does not require product specific operator set-up, meaning no lost production time when different products are being inspected.

3

Table of Contents

Production and Suppliers

			The Company’s production process consists principally of assembling standard electrical, electronic and optical components and hardware subassemblies purchased from suppliers into finished products. When proprietary circuit boards are needed, the Company generally contracts for outside vendors to build the boards based on internal company designs.
			The Company generally does not rely on a single source for parts and subassemblies, although certain components and subassemblies included in the Company’s products may only be obtained from a limited number of suppliers. Management believes alternative sources or designs could be developed for any of the components used in its products thereby mitigating any exposure to product interruption from shortages of parts or limited suppliers.

Intellectual Property

Management believes that the technology incorporated in its products gives it advantages over its competitors and prospective competitors. Protection of technology is attempted through a combination of patents, applied for patents, confidentiality agreements and trade secrets. The Company presently has 15 patents and has applied for 5 more. There can be no assurance that patents applied for will be granted, that the Company will have the resources to defend its patents or that patents the Company holds will be considered valid if challenged. In addition, it is possible that some patents will be rendered worthless as the result of technological obsolescence.

Product Development

The market for Machine Vision is characterized by rapid and continuous technological development and product innovation. The Company believes that continued and timely development of new products and enhancements to existing products is necessary to maintain its competitive position. Accordingly, the Company devotes a significant portion of its personnel and financial resources to product development programs and seeks to maintain close relationships with customers to remain responsive to their needs. The Company’s net engineering and development cost amounted to $2.7 million, $3.1 million, and $3.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998, respectively. The Company’s current product development efforts are primarily directed to Small Display Inspection products, enhancement and expansion of the InteliCheck product line and application software development tools for vision for use as part of Common VisionBlox.

Marketing

The Company generally markets its vision products to end users, but the Company has had success integrating its products with OEM’s in certain circumstances. More recently, the Company has begun to use distributors for its application software development tools for vision. Although sales are made worldwide, the Company’s strongest presence is maintained in the US (through Company employees), Europe (through employees of Integral Vision, LTD), and Asia (through a combination of representatives and of Company employees). Company sales employees are compensated by a combination of salary and commission.

Environmental Factors

The costs to the Company of complying with federal, state and local provisions regulating protection of the environment are not material.

4

Table of Contents

Competition

The Company experiences competition in all areas in which it operates. Competition is strongest in the optical disc market where the Company’s optical inspection systems compete with equipment from Dr. Schenk GmbH and Basler GmbH. Competition for InteliCheck, Small Display Inspection, and the Company’s general vision application work comes from numerous niche producers, each providing competition within a particular product line. Cognex Corp. competes either directly or indirectly via systems integrators in some of the Company’s product lines, except optical disc inspection products.

Export Sales

			Sales outside of the United States accounted for 61%, 54% and 70% of the Company’s net sales in 2000, 1999 and 1998. Management expects that such sales will continue to represent a significant percentage of its net sales. Most of the Company’s export billings are denominated in US dollars. Billings in the UK and Japan are generally in pound sterling and yen, respectively. On occasion other export billings are denominated in the currency of the customer’s country.
			See notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements Part II – ITEM 8 for details of geographic area information.

Major Customers

The nature of the Company’s product offerings may produce sales to one or a small number of customers in excess of 10% of total sales in any one year. It is possible that the specific customers reaching this threshold may change from year to year. Loss of any one of these customers could have a material impact on the Company’s result of operations. During the year ended December 31, 2000 sales to Machines Dubuit, Hanky America and Protronix Ltd represented 33% of sales. Amounts due from these customers amounted to 40% of the respective outstanding trade receivable balance at December 31, 2000.

Backlog

As of December 31, 2000, the Company had an order backlog of approximately $566,000 compared to $783,000 at December 31, 1999. Management expects that the Company will ship products representing this entire backlog in 2001.

Employees

As of February 28, 2001, the Company had approximately 67 permanent employees, as compared to 89 at February 29, 2000 and 107 at February 28, 1999. None of the Company’s employees are represented by a labor union.

ITEM 2. Properties

Manufacturing, engineering and administrative functions of Integral Vision are performed at an approximately 50,000 square foot facility owned by the Company in Farmington Hills, Michigan. In addition, Integral Vision LTD leases a 5,000 square foot facility in Bedford, England for sales and administrative functions.

5

Table of Contents

ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings

The Company is not currently involved in any material litigation.

ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None.

Part II

ITEM 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

			The Company’s common stock is traded on the over-the-counter market (NASDAQ) as a National Market Issue under the symbol INVI. As of February 28, 2001, there were approximately 4,500 stockholders of the Company including individual participants in security position listings.
			Subsequent to December 31, 2000, the Company received notification from Nasdaq that it has failed to maintain a minimum bid price of $1.00 for 30 consecutive trading days as required by Nasdaq rules. If the Company is unable to maintain a bid price of at least $1.00 for 10 consecutive trading days before April 9, 2001, Nasdaq will send the Company written notification that its securities will be delisted, and would no longer be eligible to be quoted in the Nasdaq system. At that time, the Company would be permitted to appeal that decision to a Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Panel.
			The table below shows the high and low sales prices for the Company’s common stock for each quarter in the past two years. The closing sales price for the Company’s common stock on February 28, 2001 was $0.438 per share.

The market for securities of small market-capitalization companies has been highly volatile in recent years, often for reasons unrelated to a company’s results of operations. Management believes that factors such as quarterly fluctuations in financial results, failure of new products to develop as expected, sales of common stock by existing shareholders, and substantial product orders may contribute to the volatility of the price of the Company’s common stock. General economic trends such as recessionary cycles and changing interest rates may also adversely affect the market price of the Company’s common stock. No cash dividends on common stock have been paid during any period.

6

Table of Contents

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

7

Table of Contents

The above selected financial data should be read in conjunction with Consolidated Financial Statements, including the notes thereto (Part II - - ITEM 8) and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Part II — ITEM 7). The Company has never paid a dividend and does not anticipate doing so in the foreseeable future. The Company expects to retain earnings to finance the expansion and its development of business.

ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
                Results of Operations

Overview

On June 30, 1999, the Company sold the assets of its Welding Controls division. As a result of the sale, the Company changed its name to Integral Vision. Integral Vision develops, manufactures and markets microprocessor-based process monitoring and control products for use in industrial manufacturing environments. The Company’s revenues are primarily derived from the sale of optical inspection equipment and general purpose vision software. Optical inspection equipment is principally sold to end users and suppliers of CD-R and DVD disc manufacturing equipment. General-purpose vision software is sold into numerous applications in a wide variety of industries. Except for the historical information contained herein, the matters discussed in this document are forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Act of 1934. Such statements are based on management’s current expectations and are subject to a number of factors and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. Such factors and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: the impact of the level of the Company’s indebtedness; general economic conditions and conditions in the specific industries in which the Company has significant customers; price fluctuations in the materials purchased by the Company for assembly into final products; competitive conditions in the Company’s markets and the effect of competitive products and pricing; and technological development by the Company, its customers and its competition. As a result, the Company’s results may fluctuate. Additional information concerning risk factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements is contained in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These forward-looking statements represent the Company’s best estimates as of the date of this document. The Company assumes no obligation to update such estimates except as required by the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

8

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth for the periods indicated certain items from the Company’s Statements of Operations as a percentage of net revenues. The impact of inflation for the periods presented was not significant.

9

Table of Contents

Year Ended December 31, 2000, compared to the year ended December 31, 1999

			Net revenues decreased $4.7 million (44.3%) from $10.7 million in 1999 to $6.0 million in 2000. The decrease is primarily attributable to a lack of demand for the Company’s OMNI inspection system. In 2000, the Company’s ability to sell into the overseas market was hampered by the strength of the U.S. Dollar versus the German Mark, as the Company has major competitors based in Germany. The average exchange rate of the U.S. Dollar to the German Mark increased approximately 16% in 2000 versus 1999. The Company was unable to lower its price enough to compete. In the U.S., manufacturers and replicators in the disc market spent very little to increase capacity in 2000 for a variety of reasons including increased electronic distribution (versus disc media) of music and computer software and the relocation of manufacturing operations to Asia. However, the Company did experience a modest increase in sales of its liquid crystal inspection (LCI) and disc identification/print inspection (CDiD/CDiP) products which partially offset the decline in OMNI sales.
			Direct costs of sales decreased to $6.5 million in 2000 from $10.8 million in 1999 and increased as a percentage of sales to 109% from 101%. In 2000, Management made a change in estimate, primarily related to inventory, that resulted in a $666,000 charge to direct costs of sales. The Company is in the process of liquidating the inventory related to previously discontinued product lines, however, due to disappointing results of the inventory liquidation effort to this point, Management decided that a change in estimate was necessary. The direct costs of sales for 1999 includes an inventory charge-off of $1.5 million resulting from a review of the marketability of remaining inventory related to a previously discontinued product line. Exclusive of the aforementioned adjustments, direct costs of sales as a percentage of sales would have been 97.8% in 2000 compared to 86.8% in 1999. The gross margin in 2000 was positively affected by a change in product mix as sales of our LCI and CDiD/CDiP products have less material cost than that of the OMNI systems. However, the gross margin in both periods was negatively affected by low sales volumes as fixed charges, depreciation, and amortization made up a significant portion of the costs of sales.
			Marketing expense decreased slightly in dollar terms, but increased as a percentage of net revenues from 22.9% to 39.2%. The increase as a percentage of net revenues was primarily attributable to the decreased sales volume.
			General and administrative expenses increased to $1.7 million from $1.3 million and as a percentage of net revenues from 12.2% to 29.1%. This was primarily due to the fact that a portion of the G&A was allocated to the Welding Controls division in 1999. The actual general and administrative expenditures decreased in 2000 compared to 1999.
			Product development expenses decreased to $2.7 million from $3.1 million and increased as a percentage of net revenues from 28.7% to 45.2%. The reduction in development expenditures was primarily the result of the Company’s decision to focus its resources on a few specific projects in 2000.
			In 1999, other income of $1.5 million and interest income of $374,000 ($347,000 in 2000) resulted from the sale of the Welding Controls division to Weltronic (WTC). The other income represents fees paid for services provided by Integral Vision for WTC during the transition period. These services included management services, use of facilities and software usage. The interest income represents the interest on the note receivable from WTC.
			Interest expense decreased to $177,000 from $539,000 and as a percentage of net revenues to 3.0% from 5.0%. The decrease is a result of the pay-off of substantially all debt at June 30, 1999 using the proceeds from the sale of the Welding Controls division.

10

Table of Contents

			In 1999, the gain on disposal of the Welding division of $8.7 million, net of tax, resulted from the sale of substantially all of the assets of the Welding Controls division on June 30, 1999.
			In 1999, the extraordinary charge of $583,000, net of tax credit, was a result of charges related to the early retirement of debt. These charges included unaccreted value assigned to warrants and unamortized discounts. The Company used proceeds from the sale of the Welding Controls division to pay-off substantially all outstanding debt on June 30, 1999.

Year Ended December 31, 1999, compared to the year ended December 31, 1998

			Net revenues increased $1.3 million (13.9%) from $9.4 million in 1998 to $10.7 million in 1999. The increase resulted primarily from a recovery in optical inspection system revenues as the Company’s Series 2000 product lines became established in the field.
			Direct costs of sales increased to $10.8 million in 1999 from $8.2 million in 1998 or as a percentage of sales to 101% from 86.6%. The direct costs of sales for 1999 includes an inventory charge-off of $1.5 million resulting from a review of the marketability of remaining inventory related to a previously discontinued product line. The direct costs of sales for 1998 includes an inventory charge-off of $1.4 million resulting from our decision to no longer sell inspection systems for the audio CD market. Additionally, in 1998, revenue of $1.5 million from the sale of patent technology was included in net revenue which resulted in a lower direct cost of sales as a percentage of sales. Exclusive of the aforementioned adjustments, direct costs of sales as a percentage of sales would have been 86.8% in 1999 compared to 86.1% in 1998. This is the result of lower margins in the CD-R inspection portion of the optical disc inspection product line.
			Marketing expense stayed relatively constant in dollar terms, but decreased as a percentage of net revenues from 25.6% to 22.9%. This resulted principally from the fixed nature of these expenses.
			General and administrative expenses decreased to $1.3 million from $1.4 million and as a percentage of net revenues from 14.9% to 12.2%. This resulted primarily from a reduction in the overall G&A structure after the sale of the Welding Controls division.
			Product development expenses decreased to $3.1 million from $3.5 million and as a percentage of net revenues from 37.0% to 28.7%. Development of the Series 2000 product line was substantially completed in early 1999, resulting in a significant reduction in product development expenditures. The savings were partially, though not completely, offset by increased product development expenditures for the Small Display Inspection Systems product line and the InteliCheck product line.
			Other income of $1.5 million and interest income of $374,000 resulted from the sale of the Welding Controls division to Weltronic (WTC). The other income represents fees paid for services provided by Integral Vision for WTC during the transition period. These services included management services, use of facilities and software usage. The interest income represents the interest on the note receivable from WTC.
			Interest expense decreased to $539,000 from $915,000 and as a percentage of net revenues to 5.0% from 9.7%. The decrease is a result of the pay-off of substantially all debt at June 30, 1999 using the proceeds from the sale of the Welding Controls division.
			The gain on disposal of the Welding division of $8.7 million, net of tax, resulted from the sale of substantially all of the assets of the Welding Controls division on June 30, 1999.
			An extraordinary charge of $583,000, net of tax credit, was a result of charges related to the early retirement of debt. These charges included unaccreted value assigned to warrants and unamortized discounts. The Company used proceeds from the sale of the Welding Controls division to pay-off substantially all outstanding debt on June 30, 1999.

11

Table of Contents

Quarterly Information

The following table sets forth Consolidated Statements of Operations data for each of the eight quarters in the two-year period ended December 31, 2000. The unaudited quarterly information has been prepared on the same basis as the annual information and, in management’s opinion, includes all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the information for the quarters presented.

			Quarter Ended
			2000
			Dec 31				Sep 30				Jun 30				Mar 31
			(in thousands except per share data)
Net revenues			$	672			$	1,535			$	1,785			$	1,964
Gross margin				(916	)			(65	)			(132	)			579
Income (loss) from continuing
operations				(2,557	)			(1,634	)			(1,854	)			(1,079	)
Income (loss) from
discontinued operations
Gain on disposal of Welding
division
Extraordinary charge from
early retirement of debt
Net income (loss)				(2,557	)			(1,634	)			(1,854	)			(1,079	)
Basic and diluted earnings
(loss) per share:
	Continuing operations			(.28	)			(.18	)			(.21	)			(.12	)
	Discontinued welding operations
	Disposal of Welding division
	Extraordinary charge
	Net income (loss)*		$	(.28	)		$	(.18	)		$	(.21	)		$	(.12	)

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]

			Quarter Ended
			1999
			Dec 31				Sep 30				Jun 30				Mar 31
															(restated)
			(in thousands except per share data)
Net revenues			$	2,661			$	3,975			$	2,409			$	1,698
Gross margin				(992	)			1,357				(165	)			(305	)
Income (loss) from continuing
operations				(1,879	)			24				(1,529	)			(2,287	)
Income (loss) from
discontinued operations												136				894
Gain on disposal of Welding
division				2,103				1,120				5,526
Extraordinary charge from
early retirement of debt												(583	)
Net income (loss)				224				1,144				3,550				(1,393	)
Basic and diluted earnings
(loss) per share:
	Continuing operations			(.21	)							(.17	)			(.25	)
	Discontinued welding operations											.01				.10
	Disposal of Welding division			.23				.12				.61
	Extraordinary charge											(.06	)
	Net income (loss)*		$	.02			$	.12			$	.39			$	(.15	)

            Seasonality and Quarterly Fluctuations

The Company’s revenues and operating results have varied substantially from quarter to quarter. Net revenues and earnings are typically lower in the first and fourth quarters. The most significant factors affecting these fluctuations are the seasonal buying patterns of the Company’s customers. The end users of the Company’s optical inspection products typically add manufacturing capacity in the second and third quarters in anticipation of higher production requirements in the fourth quarter. The Company expects its net revenues and earnings to continue to fluctuate from quarter to quarter.

12

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

			Operating activities for 2000 used cash of approximately $1.3 million primarily due to the Company’s loss from continuing operations of $7.1 million. The cash used in operating activities was offset by a net decrease of $3.3 million in certain working capital items. The decrease is primarily attributable to a reduction in accounts receivable as a result of the lower sales volume in 2000 compared to 1999. The modest decrease in inventory and other assets was offset by the cash used for accounts payable and other current liabilities.
			The Company’s investing activities included the receipt of $1.7 million in principal payments on the note receivable that resulted from the sale of the Welding Controls division. Additionally, $635,000 was invested in capitalized software development in 2000. Software is an integral part of the Company’s business as it is included with nearly all of the Company’s product offerings; therefore, investments in capitalized software development in the future will continue to be significant.
			The Company’s financing activities included securing a revolving line of credit under which it could borrow up to $1.0 million on certain eligible accounts receivable. At December 31, 2000 the line was fully drawn at $270,000.
			The Company’s current resources include the receipt of payments on the outstanding note receivable and anticipated cash provided by operating activities. These resources will not be sufficient to support the Company’s cash flow needs over the next twelve months. Management’s plans to obtain the additional cash needed to enable the Company to continue as a going concern include the sale of certain of its patented technologies, the sale of its building, reductions of its US and UK workforce, as well as pursuing possible joint ventures and other strategic alliances. There can be no assurance that Management will be able to successfully execute these plans before the Company has exhausted all of its resources. Further, the Company will need to secure immediate financing of approximately $900,000 in order to meet its obligations over the next three months while Management is attempting to execute its plans. Subsequent to December 31, 2000, the Company’s board of directors approved the issuance of up to $1.5 million of senior subordinated debentures (see Note M) which could provide, if placed timely, the immediate financing the Company needs over the next three months. At March 29, 2001, $120,000 of the debentures had been placed. Additional financing may or may not be available through banks. These uncertainties raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Impact of Inflation

The amounts presented in the financial statements do not provide for the effect of inflation on the Company’s operations or its financial position. Amounts shown for property, plant and equipment and for costs and expenses reflect historical cost and do not necessarily represent replacement cost or charges to operations based on replacement cost. The Company’s operations together with other sources are intended to provide funds to replace property, plant and equipment as necessary. Net income would be lower than reported if the effects of inflation were reflected either by charging operations with amounts that represent replacement costs or by using other inflation adjustments.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement No. 133 (amended by SFAS No. 137), Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. Statement 133 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2000. The Company adopted the new statement effective January 1, 2001. The statement requires the Company to recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. The Company believes there will be no material impact resulting from the application of SFAS No. 133.

13

Table of Contents

			In December 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 (SAB 101), Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements. SAB 101 provides guidance for revenue recognition under certain circumstances. The accounting and disclosures prescribed by SAB 101 will be effective for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2001. The Company believes there will be no material impact resulting from the application of SAB 101.
			In March 2000, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 44, (FIN44), Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation — an Interpretation of APB 25. This Interpretation clarified (a) the definition of employee for purposes of applying Opinion 25, (b) the criteria for determining whether a plan qualifies as a non-compensatory plan, (c) the accounting consequence of various modifications to the terms of a previously fixed stock option or award, and (d) the accounting for an exchange of stock compensation awards in a business combination. This Interpretation is effective July 1, 2000, but certain conclusions in this Interpretation cover specific events that occur after either December 15, 1998, or January 12, 2000. To the extent that this Interpretation covers events occurring during the period after December 15, 1998, or January 12, 2000 but before the effective date of July 1, 2000, the effects of applying this Interpretation are recognized on a prospective basis from July 1, 2000. The adoption of this interpretation on July 1, 2000 does not have any impact on the Company’s historical financial statements.

Item 7a. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks

			The Company is exposed to market risk stemming from changes in foreign exchange rates, interest rates and prices of inventory purchased for assembly into finished products. Changes in these factors could cause fluctuations in earnings and cash flows. In the normal course of business, exposure to interest rates is managed by fixing the interest rates on the Company’s long-term debt whenever possible. The Company does not generally enter into long-term purchase contracts but instead purchases inventory to fill specific sales contracts thereby minimizing risks with respect to inventory price fluctuations.
			Foreign Exchange Rates — The Company’s location outside the US is in the United Kingdom. This is a sales office with net non-current assets that are not significant. On a consolidated basis the Company denominates sales in the following currencies:
			•      Japanese Yen
			•      Pound Sterling
			•      French Francs
			•      Euros
			In management’s opinion, as the currencies of Western Europe and the UK are generally stable, there is no significant exposure to losses due to currency fluctuations. However, because the Yen has not been stable over the past several years, the Company does enter into forward sales contracts equal to the future amount of Yen to be received at the time the order is accepted. These hedging transactions are on an order by order basis and at no time are they speculative in nature. At December 31, 2000, the Company had no open positions.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Financial statements and quarterly results of operations are submitted in separate sections of this report.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants and Financial Disclosure

None

14

Table of Contents

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

The information contained in the Integral Vision, Inc. proxy statement (to be filed within 120 days of December 31, 2000), with respect to directors and executive officers of the Company, is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The information contained in the Integral Vision, Inc. proxy statement (to be filed within 120 days of December 31, 2000), with respect to directors and executive officers of the Company, is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The information contained in the Integral Vision, Inc. proxy statement (to be filed within 120 days of December 31, 2000), with respect to directors and executive officers of the Company, is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

The information contained in the Integral Vision, Inc. proxy statement (to be filed within 120 days of December 31, 2000), with respect to directors and executive officers of the Company, is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K

(a)(1) and (2) The response to this portion of ITEM 14 is submitted as a separate section of this report.

15

Table of Contents

16

Table of Contents

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

17

Table of Contents

18

Table of Contents

List of Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules

	(a)(1)		The following consolidated financial statements of Integral Vision, Inc. and subsidiary are included in ITEM 8:
			Report of Moore Stephens Doeren Mayhew, Independent Auditors
			Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors
			Consolidated Balance Sheets-December 31, 2000 and 1999
			Consolidated Statements of Operations-Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
			Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity-Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998
			Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows-Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
			Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements-December 31, 2000
	(2)		The following Consolidated Financial Statement schedule of Integral Vision, Inc. and subsidiary is submitted herewith:
			Schedule II      Valuation and qualifying accounts

	All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable, and therefore have been omitted.

19

Table of Contents

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Integral Vision, Inc.
Farmington Hills, MI

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Integral Vision, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2000. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the financial statement schedules for 2000 and 1999 as listed in the accompanying index at ITEM 14(a). These consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedules based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatements. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the 2000 and 1999 consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Integral Vision, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule for 2000 and 1999, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note L to the consolidated financial statements, the Company is suffering recurring losses from operations and its difficulties in generating sufficient cash flow to meet its obligations raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to this matter are also described in Note L. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/S/ Moore Stephens Doeren Mayhew

Troy, Michigan
March 16, 2001, except for Note M,
as to which the date is March 29, 2001

20

Table of Contents

Board of Directors and Stockholders
Integral Vision, Inc. (Formerly Medar, Inc.)

We have audited the consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows of Integral Vision, Inc. (formerly Medar, Inc.) and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 1998. Our audit included the financial statement schedule listed in the index at ITEM 14(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated results of operations and cash flows of Integral Vision, Inc. (formerly Medar, Inc.) and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 1998, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information contained therein.

The accompanying 1998 financial statements have been prepared assuming that the company will continue as a going concern. As more fully described in the notes, as a result of recurring operating losses the Company has violated the provisions of certain of its loan agreements with regard to levels of tangible net worth. Consequently the revolver and term notes with the Bank, all mature in June 1999. The Company is currently exploring alternatives for financing its operations should the Bank elect not to extend the agreement. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are more fully described in the notes. The financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Detroit, Michigan
February 23, 1999, except for Note D
as to which the date is March 31, 1999

21

Table of Contents

Consolidated Balance Sheets
Integral Vision, Inc. and Subsidiary

22

Table of Contents

Consolidated Statements of Operations
Integral Vision, Inc. and Subsidiary