UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FORM 10-K
Special Financial Report
Pursuant to Section 15d-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004
Commission file number: 000-51127
NATIONAL ATLANTIC HOLDINGS CORPORATION
New Jersey | 22-3316586 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
4 Paragon Way
Freehold, NJ 07728
(732) 665-1100
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code,
of Registrants principal executive offices)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, no par value per share | Nasdaq National Market | |
(Title of Class) | (Name of each exchange on which registered) |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes o No þ
(The Registrants only became subject to the Section 15(d) filing requirements on January 27, 2005 pursuant to the filing of a Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-117804) that became effective on that date.)
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Yes o No þ
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None.
This special financial report is being filed pursuant to Rule 15d-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and contains only certified financial statements as required by Rule 15d-2. This special financial report is filed under cover of the facing sheet of the form appropriate for annual reports of the Registrant as required by Rule 15d-2.
NATIONAL ATLANTIC HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Page(s) | |||||
Consolidated Financial Statement:
|
|||||
F-2 | |||||
As of December 31, 2004 and 2003
|
F-3 | ||||
For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003
and 2002
|
F-4 | ||||
For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003
and 2002
|
F-5 | ||||
For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003
and 2002
|
F-6 | ||||
For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003
and 2002
|
F-7 | ||||
F-8 | |||||
EXHIBIT 31.1
|
|||||
EXHIBIT 31.2
|
|||||
EXHIBIT 32.1
|
|||||
EXHIBIT 32.2
|
|||||
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors,
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of National Atlantic Holdings Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of National Atlantic Holdings Corporation and subsidiaries at December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Parsippany, New Jersey
F-2
NATIONAL ATLANTIC HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, | ||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||||
Investments: (Note 2)
|
||||||||||
Fixed maturities available-for-sale (amortized
cost at December 31, 2004 and 2003 was $210,636, and
$130,799, respectively)
|
$ | 210,830 | $ | 130,410 | ||||||
Short-term investments (cost at December 31,
2004 and 2003 was $13,820 and $31,569, respectively)
|
13,820 | 31,569 | ||||||||
Equity securities (cost at December 31, 2004
and 2003 was $12,979 and $8,117, respectively)
|
12,801 | 8,593 | ||||||||
Total investments
|
237,451 | 170,572 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
15,542 | 9,124 | ||||||||
Accrued investment income
|
2,085 | 1,901 | ||||||||
Premiums receivable
|
31,185 | 23,219 | ||||||||
Reinsurance recoverable on paid and unpaid losses
(Note 4)
|
34,677 | 26,346 | ||||||||
Reinsurance receivable (Note 4)
|
| 10,050 | ||||||||
Prepaid reinsurance
|
467 | 1,634 | ||||||||
Receivable from Ohio Casualty, a related party
(Note 3)
|
4,350 | 6,820 | ||||||||
Receivable from Sentry (Note 3)
|
1,250 | 2,625 | ||||||||
Deferred acquisition costs
|
10,872 | 9,788 | ||||||||
Property and equipment Net
(Note 7)
|
2,021 | 1,082 | ||||||||
Federal income taxes recoverable
|
| 2,168 | ||||||||
Other assets
|
7,272 | 1,419 | ||||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 347,172 | $ | 266,748 | ||||||
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity: | ||||||||||
Liabilities:
|
||||||||||
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
(Note 5)
|
$ | 184,283 | $ | 134,201 | ||||||
Unearned premiums
|
64,170 | 51,813 | ||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
2,900 | 2,290 | ||||||||
Reinsurance payable
|
4,621 | 3,260 | ||||||||
Deferred revenue from related party (Note 3)
|
| 9,530 | ||||||||
Deferred revenue (Note 3)
|
| 2,839 | ||||||||
Deferred income taxes (Note 6)
|
11,995 | 7,999 | ||||||||
Federal income taxes payable
|
1,512 | | ||||||||
State income taxes payable
|
89 | 399 | ||||||||
Other liabilities
|
9,763 | 4,630 | ||||||||
Total liabilities
|
279,333 | 216,961 | ||||||||
Stockholders equity:
|
||||||||||
Common stock, Class A, no par value
(4,300,000 shares authorized; 2,747,743 shares issued
as of December 31, 2004 and 2003)
|
3,002 | 3,002 | ||||||||
Common stock, Class B, no par value
(4,300,000 shares authorized; 2,194,247 shares issued as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003)
|
28,738 | 28,258 | ||||||||
Retained earnings
|
35,917 | 18,470 | ||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
182 | 57 | ||||||||
Total stockholders equity
|
67,839 | 49,787 | ||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
$ | 347,172 | $ | 266,748 | ||||||
F-3
NATIONAL ATLANTIC HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||
Revenue:
|
||||||||||||||
Net earned premiums
|
$ | 179,667 | $ | 143,156 | $ | 75,654 | ||||||||
Net investment income
|
7,061 | 4,258 | 1,593 | |||||||||||
Realized gains (losses) on
investments net
|
1,931 | 1,373 | (55 | ) | ||||||||||
Replacement carrier revenue from related party
|
13,880 | 13,298 | 21,683 | |||||||||||
Replacement carrier revenue from unrelated party
|
4,089 | 661 | | |||||||||||
Other income
|
2,044 | 929 | 564 | |||||||||||
Total revenue
|
208,672 | 163,675 | 99,439 | |||||||||||
Costs and Expenses:
|
||||||||||||||
Loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred
|
134,987 | 108,123 | 69,491 | |||||||||||
Acquisition expenses
|
39,586 | 25,547 | 14,887 | |||||||||||
Other operating and general expenses
|
7,765 | 992 | 3,605 | |||||||||||
Total costs and expenses
|
182,338 | 134,662 | 87,983 | |||||||||||
Income before income taxes
|
26,334 | 29,013 | 11,456 | |||||||||||
Provision for income taxes
|
8,886 | 9,945 | 2,822 | |||||||||||
Net Income
|
$ | 17,448 | $ | 19,068 | $ | 8,634 | ||||||||
Net income per share Common Stock
Basic
|
$ | 3.53 | $ | 4.29 | $ | 1.96 | ||||||||
Net income per share Common Stock
Diluted
|
$ | 3.11 | $ | 3.77 | $ | 1.74 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
F-4
NATIONAL ATLANTIC HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||
Net Income
|
$ | 17,448 | $ | 19,068 | $ | 8,634 | ||||||||
Other comprehensive income net of tax:
|
||||||||||||||
Net holding gains arising during the year
|
451 | 63 | 441 | |||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for realized (gains)
included in net income
|
(326 | ) | (354 | ) | (43 | ) | ||||||||
Total other comprehensive (loss) income
|
125 | (291 | ) | 398 | ||||||||||
Comprehensive Income
|
$ | 17,573 | $ | 18,777 | $ | 9,032 | ||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
F-5
NATIONAL ATLANTIC HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Class A | Class B | Retained | Receivable | Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Common Stock | Earnings | for | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Accumulated | Securities | Comprehensive | Stockholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Deficit) | Issued | Income (Loss) | Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2001
|
2,792,893 | 3,055 | 1,611,597 | 15,212 | (9,232 | ) | (13,000 | ) | (50 | ) | (4,015 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Exchange of Class A for Class B Common
Stock
|
(45,150 | ) | (53 | ) | 45,150 | 53 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of Class B Common Stock
|
13,000 | 13,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of stock options
|
706 | 706 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unamortized deferred compensation
|
(589 | ) | (589 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income
|
8,634 | 8,634 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income
|
398 | 398 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2002
|
2,747,743 | 3,002 | 1,656,747 | 15,382 | (598 | ) | 0 | 348 | 18,134 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of Class B Common Stock
|
537,500 | 12,457 | 12,457 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of Stock Options
|
736 | 736 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unamortized deferred compensation
|
(552 | ) | (552 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of 2002 options
|
235 | 235 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income
|
19,068 | 19,068 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss
|
(291 | ) | (291 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2003
|
2,747,743 | 3,002 | 2,194,247 | 28,258 | 18,470 | 0 | 57 | 49,787 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of 2002 and 2003 options
|
480 | 480 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income
|
17,448 | 17,448 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income
|
125 | 125 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
2,747,743 | $ | 3,002 | 2,194,247 | $ | 28,738 | $ | 35,917 | 0 | $ | 182 | $ | 67,839 | ||||||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
F-6
NATIONAL ATLANTIC HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING
ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 17,448 | $ | 19,068 | $ | 8,634 | |||||||||
Adjustment to reconcile net income to net cash
provided (used in) operating activities:
|
|||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
428 | 312 | 285 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of premium/discount on bonds
|
1,090 | 837 | 259 | ||||||||||||
Realized losses (gains) on investment sales
|
(1,931 | ) | (1,373 | ) | 55 | ||||||||||
Changes in:
|
|||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes
|
3,932 | 9,487 | 2,823 | ||||||||||||
Premiums receivable
|
(7,966 | ) | (1,364 | ) | (12,271 | ) | |||||||||
Reinsurance recoverable
|
(8,331 | ) | (3,228 | ) | 5,998 | ||||||||||
Reinsurance receivable
|
10,050 | (10,050 | ) | | |||||||||||
Prepaid reinsurance
|
1,167 | 321 | 7,230 | ||||||||||||
Receivable from Ohio Casualty
|
(2,470 | ) | (53 | ) | (6,767 | ) | |||||||||
Receivable from Sentry
|
1,375 | (2,625 | ) | | |||||||||||
Guarantee fund receivable
|
| | 21 | ||||||||||||
Deferred acquisition costs
|
(1,084 | ) | (1,010 | ) | (6,947 | ) | |||||||||
Accrued interest income
|
(184 | ) | (1,051 | ) | (678 | ) | |||||||||
Federal income taxes recoverable
|
2,168 | (2,168 | ) | 608 | |||||||||||
Other assets
|
(5,856 | ) | 1,171 | (2,449 | ) | ||||||||||
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
50,082 | 48,729 | 28,740 | ||||||||||||
Stock options
|
480 | 419 | 117 | ||||||||||||
Accounts payable
|
610 | 745 | 1,364 | ||||||||||||
Deferred revenue from related party
|
(9,530 | ) | 3,614 | 5,917 | |||||||||||
Deferred revenue
|
(2,839 | ) | 2,839 | | |||||||||||
Unearned premiums
|
12,357 | 5,795 | 29,208 | ||||||||||||
Reinsurance payable
|
1,361 | 3,920 | (2,324 | ) | |||||||||||
Federal income taxes payable
|
1,512 | | | ||||||||||||
State income taxes payable
|
(310 | ) | 394 | | |||||||||||
Other liabilities
|
5,132 | 532 | 2,892 | ||||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
73,631 | 75,266 | 62,715 | ||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING
ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment
|
(1,367 | ) | (474 | ) | (821 | ) | |||||||||
Purchases of fixed maturity investments
|
(215,882 | ) | (131,225 | ) | (56,735 | ) | |||||||||
Sales and maturities of fixed income investments
|
135,410 | 68,326 | 4,016 | ||||||||||||
Purchases of equity securities
|
(21,779 | ) | (14,282 | ) | (1,927 | ) | |||||||||
Sales of equity securities
|
18,650 | 7,664 | 875 | ||||||||||||
Purchases of short-term investments
net
|
17,755 | (26,984 | ) | (556 | ) | ||||||||||
Net cash (used in) investing activities
|
(67,213 | ) | (96,975 | ) | (55,148 | ) | |||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING
ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||||||||||
Change in notes payable
|
| | (5,683 | ) | |||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common
stock net
|
| 12,457 | | ||||||||||||
Capital allocation to shareholder
|
| | 13,000 | ||||||||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
0 | 12,457 | 7,317 | ||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash
|
6,418 | (9,252 | ) | 14,884 | |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
9,124 | 18,376 | 3,492 | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 15,542 | $ | 9,124 | $ | 18,376 | |||||||||
Cash paid during the year for:
|
|||||||||||||||
Interest
|
$ | | $ | 3 | $ | 389 | |||||||||
Income taxes paid (received)
|
$ | 1,692 | $ | 2,227 | $ | (608 | ) | ||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
F-7
NATIONAL ATLANTIC HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
1. | Nature of Operations and Significant Accounting Policies |
National Atlantic Holdings Corporation (NAHC) and Subsidiaries (the Company) was incorporated in New Jersey, on July 29, 1994. The Company is a holding company for Proformance Insurance Company (Proformance), its wholly-owned subsidiary. Proformance is domiciled in the State of New Jersey and writes property and casualty insurance, primarily personal auto. NAHCs initial capitalization was pursuant to private placement offerings. The initial stockholders paid $1.16 per share for 2,812,200 shares of Class A common stock.
On February 14, 1995 the Board of Directors approved the offering of up to 645,000 shares at $2.33 per share of nonvoting Class B common stock. At the end of 1995, 283,112 shares were issued at $2.33 per share to new agents and at 105% of the net book value to the officers and directors under a one-time stock purchase program. The average per share price for both issuances of this Class B common stock was approximately $2.05 per share. On April 7, 1995, the Certificate of Incorporation was amended to authorize the issuance of up to 4,300,000 shares of nonvoting common stock.
NAHC also has a controlling interest (80 percent) in Niagara Atlantic Holdings Corporation and Subsidiaries (Niagara), which is a New York corporation. Niagara was incorporated on December 29, 1995. The remaining interest (20 percent) is owned by New York agents. Niagara was established as a holding company in order to execute a surplus debenture and service agreement with Capital Mutual Insurance (CMI). As of June 5, 2000, CMI has gone into liquidation and is under the control of the New York State Insurance Department. CMI is no longer writing new business and therefore neither is Niagara. Niagara had $0 equity value as of December 31, 2004 and 2003. NAHC has no remaining obligations as it relates to the agreement.
In addition, NAHC has another wholly owned subsidiary, Riverview Professional Services, Inc., which was established in 2002 for the purpose of providing case management and medical cost containment services to Proformance and other unaffiliated clients.
In December 2001, NAHC established National Atlantic Financial Corporation (NAFC), to offer general financing services to its agents and customers. In November 2003, NAFC established a wholly owned subsidiary, Mayfair Reinsurance Company Limited, for the purpose of assuming reinsurance business as a retrocessionaire from third party reinsurers of Proformance and providing reinsurance services to unaffiliated clients.
Another wholly owned subsidiary of NAHC is National Atlantic Insurance Agency, Inc. (NAIA), which was incorporated on April 5, 1995. The Company purchased all 1,000 shares of NAIAs authorized common stock at $1 per share. NAIA obtained its license to operate as an insurance agency in December 1995. The agency commenced operations on March 20, 1996. The primary purpose of this entity is to service any direct business written by Proformance and to provide services to agents and policyholders acquired as part of replacement carrier transactions.
The significant accounting policies followed by the Company in the preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements are as follows:
Basis of Presentation The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) which differ materially from statutory accounting practices prescribed or permitted for insurance companies by regulatory agencies. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
Segment Disclosure We manage and report our business as a single segment based upon several factors. Our insurance subsidiary, Proformance Insurance Company, has historically generated in excess of 90% of our total consolidated revenues and reported profit or loss. In addition, Proformance is our only subsidiary
F-8
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
which has assets in excess of 10% of the consolidated assets of the Company. Therefore, only Proformance meets any of the quantitative thresholds of a reportable segment. In addition, although Proformance writes both personal line and commercial line business, we consider those operating segments as one operating segment due to the fact that the nature of the products are similar, they share the same distribution system, the nature of the regulatory environment for each line is similar and they follow the same production process in accordance with the requirements of segments that share similar economic characteristics.
A summary of our consolidated revenues is as follows:
For the years ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||||
Proformance
|
|||||||||||||||||
Personal lines insurance
|
$ | 165,681,991 | $ | 126,845,351 | $ | 66,264,731 | |||||||||||
Commercial lines insurance
|
13,984,730 | 16,310,572 | 9,389,152 | ||||||||||||||
Replacement carrier revenue from related party
|
13,880,303 | 13,297,593 | 21,683,013 | ||||||||||||||
Replacement carrier revenue from unrelated party
|
4,088,889 | 661,111 | | ||||||||||||||
Riverview
|
|||||||||||||||||
Medical Case Management
|
4,882,171 | 3,688,114 | 644,509 | ||||||||||||||
NAIA
|
|||||||||||||||||
Insurance brokerage
|
4,061,520 | 2,572,129 | 1,088,606 | ||||||||||||||
Mayfair
|
|||||||||||||||||
Reinsurance
|
| | | ||||||||||||||
NAHC
|
|||||||||||||||||
Intercompany elimination entries
|
(8,417,604 | ) | (6,190,977 | ) | (1,716,642 | ) | |||||||||||
Subtotal
|
198,162,000 | 157,183,893 | 97,353,369 | ||||||||||||||
Investment Income
|
7,061,161 | 4,257,672 | 1,592,878 | ||||||||||||||
Net realized investment gains (losses)
|
1,931,258 | 1,372,557 | (55,219 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other income
|
1,517,823 | 860,379 | 547,989 | ||||||||||||||
Total Revenue
|
$ | 208,672,242 | $ | 163,674,501 | $ | 99,439,017 | |||||||||||
Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The primary estimates made by management involve the establishment of reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents For purposes of the statements of cash flows, the Company considers short-term investments with an initial maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Property and Equipment Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization is provided under the straight-line method based upon the following estimated useful lives:
Estimated | ||||
Description | Life (Years) | |||
Automobiles
|
5 | |||
Furniture and fixtures
|
7 | |||
Computer software and electronic data equipment
|
3 | |||
Leasehold improvements
|
* |
* | Amortized over the remaining life of the lease from the date placed in service. |
F-9
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Major replacements of, or improvements to, property and equipment are capitalized. Minor replacements, repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. Upon retirement or sale, the cost of the assets disposed and the related accumulated depreciation and amortization are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is recorded in operations. The recoverable value of property and equipment assets are evaluated at least annually.
Investments Fixed maturity investments which may be sold in response to, among other things, changes in interest rates, prepayment risk, income tax strategies or liquidity needs, are classified as available-for-sale and are carried at market value. Equity securities, which are classified as available for sale, are also carried at market value. Changes in market value for fixed maturity investments and equity securities are credited or charged to stockholders equity as other comprehensive income (loss). Short-term securities are carried at cost, which approximates market value. Market values are based on quoted market prices. For mortgage-backed securities for which there is a prepayment risk, prepayment assumptions are evaluated and revised as necessary. Any adjustments required due to the resultant change in effective yields and maturities are recognized on a prospective basis through yield adjustments. Realized investment gains and losses are recorded on the specific identification method. All security transactions are recorded on a trade date basis.
The Company considers a number of factors in the evaluation of whether a decline in value is other-than-temporary including: (a) the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer; (b) the Companys ability and intent to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for an anticipated recovery in value; and (c) the period and degree to which the market value has been below cost. A fixed maturity security is other-than-temporarily impaired if it is probable that the Company will not be able to collect all the amounts due under the securitys contractual terms. Equity investments are considered to be impaired when it becomes apparent that the Company will not recover its cost after considering the severity and duration of the unrealized loss, compared with general market conditions. These adjustments are recorded as realized investment losses.
Concentration of Credit Risk Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk include cash balances and marketable fixed maturity securities. The Company places its temporary cash investments with creditworthy financial institutions. The Company holds bonds and notes issued by the United States government and corporations. By policy, these investments are kept within limits designed to prevent risks caused by concentration. Consequently, as of December 31, 2004, the Company does not believe it has significant concentrations of credit risks. The Company is exposed to a concentration of credit risk with respect to amounts due from reinsurers.
Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs Deferred acquisition costs, which consist of commissions and other underwriting expenses, are costs that vary with and are directly related to the underwriting of new policies and are deferred and amortized over the period in which the related premiums are earned. Anticipated investment income is considered in the determination of the recoverability of deferred acquisition costs.
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 were $39,585,988, $25,547,188 and $14,887,237, respectively.
Insurance Liabilities/ Reserves for Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses The provision for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses includes individual case estimates, principally on the basis of reports received from claim adjusters engaged by the Company, for losses reported prior to the close of the year and estimates with respect to incurred but not reported (IBNR) losses and loss adjustment expenses, net of anticipated salvage and subrogation. The method of making such estimates and for establishing the resulting reserves is continually reviewed and updated, and adjustments resulting therefrom are reflected in current operations. The estimates are determined by management and are based upon industry data relating to loss and loss adjustment expense ratios as well as the Companys historical data. The unpaid losses and unpaid loss adjustment expenses presented in these financial statements have not been discounted.
F-10
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
This liability is subject to the impact of changes in claim severity, frequency and other factors which may be outside of the Companys control. Despite the variability inherent in such estimates, management believes that the liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses is adequate and represents its best estimate of the ultimate cost of investigating, defending and settling claims. However, the Companys actual future experience may not conform to the assumptions inherent in the determination of this liability. Accordingly, the ultimate settlement of these losses and the related loss adjustment expenses may vary significantly from the amounts included in the accompanying financial statements.
Recognition of Premium Revenues Premiums written or assumed are earned on a daily pro-rata basis over the estimated life of the policy or reinsurance contract. Unearned premiums are established and represent the portion of net premiums which is applicable to the unexpired terms of policies in force.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts The Company creates a reserve for future premium receivables that may become uncollectible. The amount of the reserve is based upon managements assessment of collectibility in reviewing aging experience.
Recognition of Replacement Carrier Revenues Revenue from replacement carrier contracts is recognized pro-rata over the period as the Company completes the obligations under the terms of the agreement, typically the renewal option period of the policyholders ranging from six months to a year, as required pursuant to the terms of the contract. Certain replacement carrier contracts require additional consideration to be paid to the Company based on an evaluation of premiums written to surplus. The calculation is performed and related revenue is recognized as earned annually pursuant to the terms of the contract. See Note 3.
Accounting for Reinsurance The Company accounts for reinsurance in conformity with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 113, Accounting and Reporting for Reinsurance of Short-Duration and Long-Duration Contracts. This standard requires the Company to report assets and liabilities relating to reinsured contracts gross of the effects of reinsurance. The standard also establishes the conditions required for a contract with a reinsurer to be accounted for as reinsurance and prescribes accounting and reporting standards for such contracts.
The Company contracts with insurance companies, which assume portions of the risk undertaken. The Company remains the primary obligor to the extent any reinsurer is unable to meet its obligations under the existing reinsurance agreements. The reinsurance contracts are accounted for on a basis consistent with that used in the accounting of the direct policies issued by the Company.
Income Taxes The Company files a consolidated federal tax return. Under the tax allocation agreement, current federal income tax expense (benefit) is computed on a separate return basis and provides that members shall make payments (receive reimbursements) to the extent that their income (losses and other credit) contributes to (reduces) consolidated federal income tax expense. The member companies are reimbursed for the tax attributes they have generated when utilized in the consolidated return.
The Company recognizes taxes payable or refundable for the current year, and deferred taxes for the future tax consequences of differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years the temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for finance reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes are expected to reverse.
Stock Options The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123), in 1996. Under the provisions of SFAS 123,
F-11
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
companies can elect to account for stock-based compensation plans using a fair-value based method or continue measuring compensation expenses for those plans using the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25) and related interpretations. In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148 which amended the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method on reported results. The Company has elected to continue using the intrinsic value method (APB No. 25) to account for stock based compensation plans.
The following table presents the Companys pro forma net income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, assuming the Company had used the fair value method (SFAS No. 123) to recognize compensation expense with respect to its options:
Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||
Net income as reported
|
$ | 17,448,050 | $ | 19,067,575 | $ | 8,633,512 | |||||||
Plus: Compensation expense recorded against income
|
480,773 | 419,000 | 118,000 | ||||||||||
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation
expense determined under fair value method for all awards, net
of related tax effects
|
(492,596 | ) | (418,559 | ) | (130,973 | ) | |||||||
Pro forma net income
|
$ | 17,436,227 | $ | 19,068,016 | $ | 8,620,539 | |||||||
Net income per weighted average shareholding
|
|||||||||||||
Basic as reported
|
$ | 3.53 | $ | 4.29 | $ | 1.96 | |||||||
Basic proforma
|
$ | 3.53 | $ | 4.29 | $ | 1.96 | |||||||
Diluted as reported
|
$ | 3.11 | $ | 3.77 | $ | 1.74 | |||||||
Diluted proforma
|
$ | 3.11 | $ | 3.77 | $ | 1.74 |
The above pro forma information has been determined as if the Company had accounted for its employees stock options under the fair value method. The fair value of the options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with a volatility factor assumed to be zero percent and the following weighted average assumptions:
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
Risk-free interest yield
|
4.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | |||||||||
Dividend yield
|
0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | |||||||||
Average life
|
3 Years | 3 Years | 3 Years |
The weighted average fair value of options granted whose exercise price was equal to the market price of the stock on the date of grant was $0 for each of the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002.
The weighted average fair value of options granted whose exercise price was less than the market price of the stock on the date of grant for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $0, $823,049 and $716,807, respectively. The weighted average exercise price of options granted whose exercise price was less than market price of the stock on the date of grant was $0, $6.14 and $0.60, respectively.
Option pricing models require the input of highly subjective assumptions. Because the Companys employee stock has characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in managements opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options.
F-12
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
On December 16, 2004, the FASB issued Statement No. 123 (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment. This statement requires all entities to recognize compensation expense in an amount equal to the fair value of share-based payments (e.g., stock options and restricted stock) granted to employees. This standard is effective for public companies in interim or annual periods beginning after June 15, 2005. We are currently in the process of assessing the impact that the adoption of this standard will have on our financial statements.
Retirement Plans The Company has a contributory savings plan for salaried employees meeting certain service requirements, which qualifies under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Retirement plan expense for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 amounted to $235,285, $149,760 and $127,730, respectively.
Guaranty Fund Assessments As more fully described in Note 10, New Jersey law requires that property and casualty insurers licensed to do business in New Jersey participate in the New Jersey Property-Liability Insurance Guaranty Association (which we refer to as NJPLIGA). Proformance accounts for its participation in the NJPLIGA in accordance with Statement of Position 97-3, the Accounting Treatment For Insurance and Other Enterprises for Insurance Related Assessments. In this regard, Proformance records a liability when writing the premiums, as direct written premiums are the basis for the state assessment and are considered the obligating event that establishes the liability. The percentage of written premium recorded as a liability is equal to the surcharge percentage mandated by the state to be charged to each policy holder. This surcharge percentage is likewise determined based on the relationship between the Companys direct written premium to that of the industry as a whole as determined by the state. As such, Proformance also records a corresponding receivable from policyholders in recognition of the fact that New Jersey law allows for Proformance to fully recoup amounts assessed through policyholder surcharges. There is no income statement impact because as SOP 97-3 outlines, policyholder surcharges that are required as a pass through to the state regulatory body should be accounted for in a manner such that amounts collected or receivable are not recorded as revenues and amounts due or paid are not expensed.
Also, as more fully described in Note 10, the Company may be assigned business by the State of New Jersey relating to the Personal Automobile Insurance Plan (PAIP) and the Commercial Automobile Insurance Plan (CAIP). With regard to PAIP, the State of New Jersey allows for the Company to enter into Limited Assignment Distribution (LAD) arrangements whereby for a fee, the Companys portion of PAIP business is transferred to the LAD carrier such that Proformance has no responsibility for the PAIP business. Proformance records its CAIP liability assignment on its books as assumed business as required by the State of New Jersey.
The New Jersey Automobile Insurance Risk Exchange, or NJAIRE, is a plan designed to compensate member companies for claims paid for non-economic losses and claims adjustment expenses which would not have been incurred had the tort limitation option provided under New Jersey insurance law been elected by the injured party filing the claim for non-economic losses. As a member company of NJAIRE, we submit information with respect to the number of claims reported to us that meet the criteria outlined above. NJAIRE compiles the information submitted by all member companies and remits assessments to each member company for this exposure. The Company, since its inception, has never received compensation from NJAIRE as a result of its participation in the plan. The Companys participation in NJAIRE is mandated by the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance. The assessments that the Company has received required payment to NJAIRE for the amounts assessed. The Company records the assessments received as other operating and general expenses.
F-13
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
2. | Investments |
The amortized cost and estimated market value of the investment portfolio, classified by category, as of December 31, 2004 are as follows:
Cost/ | Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Estimated | ||||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | (Losses) | Market Value | ||||||||||||||
Fixed maturities:
|
|||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government, government agencies and
authorities
|
$ | 113,849,983 | $ | 167,336 | $ | (229,199 | ) | $ | 113,788,120 | ||||||||
State, local government and agencies
|
47,447,514 | 471,383 | (151,091 | ) | 47,767,806 | ||||||||||||
Industrial and miscellaneous
|
48,235,166 | 445,482 | (520,779 | ) | 48,159,869 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities
|
1,103,325 | 13,733 | (2,786 | ) | 1,114,272 | ||||||||||||
Total fixed maturities
|
210,635,988 | 1,097,934 | (903,855 | ) | 210,830,067 | ||||||||||||
Other Investments:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Short-term investments
|
13,820,488 | | | 13,820,488 | |||||||||||||
Equity securities
|
12,718,656 | 178,670 | (96,790 | ) | 12,800,536 | ||||||||||||
Total Investments
|
$ | 237,175,132 | $ | 1,276,604 | $ | (1,000,645 | ) | $ | 237,451,091 | ||||||||
The company has two non-redeemable preferred stocks, issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association and by ABN Amro. The Company currently as 29,800 shares of the Federal National Mortgage Association preferred stock and 500 shares of the ABN Amro preferred stock. The fair market values as of December 31, 2004 are $1,230,740 and $528,128, respectively.
The amortized cost and estimated market value of the investment portfolio, classified by category, as of December 31, 2003 are as follows:
Cost/ | Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Estimated | ||||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | (Losses) | Market Value | ||||||||||||||
Fixed maturities:
|
|||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government, government agencies and
authorities
|
$ | 39,633,926 | $ | 17,604 | $ | (338,138 | ) | $ | 39,313,392 | ||||||||
State, local government and agencies
|
41,277,531 | 12,929 | | 41,290,460 | |||||||||||||
Industrial and miscellaneous
|
44,903,263 | 116,868 | (205,222 | ) | 44,814,909 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-Backed securities
|
4,984,097 | 6,604 | | 4,990,701 | |||||||||||||
Total fixed maturities
|
130,798,817 | 154,005 | (543,360 | ) | 130,409,462 | ||||||||||||
Other Investments:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Short-term investments
|
31,569,445 | | | 31,569,445 | |||||||||||||
Equity securities
|
8,117,385 | 763,737 | (288,038 | ) | 8,593,084 | ||||||||||||
Total Investments
|
$ | 170,485,647 | $ | 917,742 | $ | (831,398 | ) | $ | 170,571,991 | ||||||||
F-14
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The fair values of available-for-sale securities at December 31, 2004, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities of mortgaged-backed securities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without prepayment penalties.
Estimated | ||||
Fair Value | ||||
Due in one year or less
|
$ | 10,446,656 | ||
Due in one year through five years
|
64,609,795 | |||
Due in five years through ten years
|
62,251,714 | |||
Due in ten through twenty years
|
71,127,928 | |||
Due in over twenty years
|
1,279,701 | |||
Mortgage-Backed securities
|
1,114,273 | |||
Total
|
$ | 210,830,067 | ||
For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company held no investments that were below investment grade or not rated by an independent rating agency.
The Company has placed securities on deposit having a fair value of $200,000 and $208,724 at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, in order to comply with New Jersey state insurance regulatory requirements.
Proceeds from sales of fixed maturity and equity securities and gross realized gains and losses on sales as well as other-than-temporary impairment charges for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 are shown below:
For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
Proceeds
|
$ | 154,060,505 | $ | 75,990,136 | $ | 4,890,603 | ||||||
Gross realized gains
|
2,605,208 | 1,802,770 | 23,174 | |||||||||
Gross realized losses
|
(673,950 | ) | (430,213 | ) | (78,393 | ) |
There was one security of $260,515 that was considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of December 31, 2004. No other-than-temporary impairments were recognized for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
The components of net investment income earned were as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||
Investment income:
|
|||||||||||||
Interest income
|
$ | 6,651,242 | $ | 4,199,917 | $ | 1,675,194 | |||||||
Dividend income
|
539,105 | 312,545 | 38,622 | ||||||||||
Investment income
|
7,190,347 | 4,512,462 | 1,713,816 | ||||||||||
Investment expenses
|
(129,187 | ) | (254,790 | ) | (120,938 | ) | |||||||
Net investment income
|
$ | 7,061,160 | $ | 4,257,672 | $ | 1,592,878 | |||||||
Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements Effective December 31, 2003, the Company adopted the disclosure requirements of Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 03-01, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Applications of Certain Investments. Under the consensus, disclosures are required for unrealized losses on fixed maturity and equity securities accounted for under SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investment in Debt and Equity Securities, which are classified as either available-for-sale or held-to-maturity. The disclosure requirements include quantitative information
F-15
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
regarding the aggregate amount of unrealized losses and the associated fair value of the investments in an unrealized loss position, segregated into time periods for which the investments have been in an unrealized loss position. The consensus also requires certain qualitative disclosures about the holdings in an unrealized loss position in order to provide additional information that the Company considered in concluding that the unrealized losses were not other-than-temporary. In September 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, which we refer to as FASB, issued FASB Staff Position Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 03-1-1, Effective Date of Paragraphs 10-20 of EITF Issue No. 03-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments, which delays the effective date for the recognition and measurement guidance in EITF Issue No. 03-1. In addition, the FASB has issued a proposed FASB Staff Position to consider whether further application guidance is necessary for securities analyzed for impairment under EITF 03-1. We continue to assess the potential impact that the adoption of the proposed FASB Staff Position could have on our financial statements.
There are two equity and preferred securities having an unrealized loss of $47,799, a fair value of $436,220 and an amortized cost of $484,019 as of December 31, 2004 which have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than six months.
There is one equity and preferred security having an unrealized loss of $33,619, a fair value of $296,560 and an amortized cost of $330,179 as of December 31, 2004 which has been in a continuous unrealized loss position between six and twelve months.
There is one preferred security having an unrealized loss of $15,372, a fair value of $528,128 and an amortized cost of $543,500 as of December 31, 2004 which has been in a continuous unrealized loss position for greater than twelve months.
There are 112 fixed maturity securities having an unrealized loss of $310,972, a fair value of $74,296,481 and an amortized cost of $74,607,453 as of December 31, 2004 which have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than six months.
There are 12 fixed maturity securities having an unrealized loss of $17,363, a fair value of $2,180,861 and an amortized cost of $2,198,224 as of December 31, 2004 which have been in a continuous unrealized loss position between 6 and 12 months.
There are 19 fixed maturity securities having an unrealized loss of $575,520, a fair value of $14,626,924 and an amortized cost of $15,202,444 as of December 31, 2004 which have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for greater than 12 months.
The fixed income securities in an unrealized loss position are above investment grade securities with extended maturity dates, which have been adversely impacted by the increase in interest rates after the purchase date. As part of the ongoing security monitoring process by the Companys investment manager and investment committee, it was concluded that there was one security that was considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of December 31, 2004. It is managements position with the committees confirmation that the securities that are temporarily impaired are of quality and continue to pay in accordance with their contractual terms with the expectation that they will continue to do so.
The evaluation for other-than-temporary impairments is a quantitative and qualitative process, which is subject to risks and uncertainties in the determination of whether declines in the fair value of investments are other-than-temporary. The risks and uncertainties include changes in general economic conditions, the issuers financial condition or near term recovery prospects and the effects of changes in interest rates.
F-16
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The changes in net unrealized investment gains (losses) were as follows:
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
Fixed Maturities:
|
||||||||||||
Balance at January 1,
|
$ | (256,974 | ) | $ | 456,973 | $ | (7,207 | ) | ||||
Unrealized investment gains (losses) during the
year
|
583,434 | (1,081,738 | ) | 703,303 | ||||||||
Deferred income taxes
|
(198,368 | ) | 367,791 | (239,123 | ) | |||||||
Balance at December 31,
|
128,092 | $ | (256,974 | ) | $ | 456,973 | ||||||
Net change in unrealized investment gains (losses)
|
385,066 | $ | (713,947 | ) | $ | 464,180 | ||||||
Equity Securities:
|
||||||||||||
Balance at January 1,
|
$ | 313,961 | $ | (109,109 | ) | $ | (42,437 | ) | ||||
Unrealized investment gains (losses) during the
year
|
(393,819 | ) | 641,015 | (99,988 | ) | |||||||
Deferred income taxes
|
133,898 | (217,945 | ) | 33,316 | ||||||||
Balance at December 31,
|
54,040 | $ | 313,961 | $ | (109,109 | ) | ||||||
Net change in unrealized investment gains (losses)
|
(259,921 | ) | $ | 423,070 | $ | (66,672 | ) | |||||
Net realized gains (losses) were as follows:
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
Fixed maturities
|
$ | 2,605,208 | $ | 1,546,459 | $ | 592 | ||||||
Equity Securities
|
(673,950 | ) | (173,902 | ) | (55,811 | ) | ||||||
$ | 1,931,258 | $ | 1,372,557 | $ | (55,219 | ) | ||||||
3. | Replacement Carrier Transactions |
Ohio Casualty |
On December 18, 2001 the Company entered into a replacement carrier agreement with Ohio Casualty Insurance Company (OCIC) and Ohio Casualty of New Jersey, Inc. (OCNJ) pursuant to which OCNJ would transfer to Proformance the obligation to offer renewals for all of OCNJs New Jersey private passenger automobile business, effective March 18, 2002. In accordance with the agreement, OCNJ ceased issuing private passenger automobile policies in the State of New Jersey. As part of the withdrawal, Proformance became the replacement carrier for OCNJ, providing OCNJs policyholders with a guaranteed option to renew their policies over a twelve month period. OCNJ retains all rights and responsibilities related to policies issued by OCNJ and is responsible to issue any endorsements in the ordinary course of business prior to the renewal date. Under the terms of the contract, the offers of renewal are processed over a twelve month period. As part of the transaction, OCNJ paid Proformance $41,100,000, of which $500,000 was paid at the contract date and $40,600,000 was paid in twelve equal monthly installments of $3,833,333, with the first payment due on March 18, 2002.
In connection with this transaction, OCIC acquired a 19.71 percent interest (at the time of the transaction) in the Company by purchasing 867,955 shares of Class B nonvoting common stock. The Company valued the stock issued as part of the transaction at $13,500,000, based on a valuation performed for the Company as of January 1, 2002. The remaining $27,600,000 was earned evenly as replacement carrier revenue over the twelve month period beginning on March 18, 2002, consistent with the terms of the contract.
F-17
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
In addition, as part of the agreement, there is also a provisional amount due to the Company pursuant to which OCNJ will pay to the Company up to $15,600,000 of additional consideration as necessary to reduce the premium-to-surplus ratio to 2.5 to 1 on the renewal business for a three year period based on calculations performed at each calendar year-end. As the additional consideration depends on factors that do not exist or are not measurable at the inception of the agreement they are considered contingent and the additional consideration is recognized as actual results reflect a premium-to-surplus ratio of greater than 2.5 to 1.
With respect to our replacement carrier transaction with OCIC and OCNJ, on February 22, 2005 Proformance notified OCNJ that OCNJ owed Proformance $7,762,000 for the 2004 year in connection with the requirement that a premium-to-surplus ratio of 2.5 to 1 be maintained on the OCNJ renewal business. Pursuant to our agreement, OCNJ has until May 15, 2005 to make payment to us. Subsequent to the notification provided to OCIC and OCNJ, we have had several discussions with OCIC relating to certain components to the underlying calculation which supports the amount owed to Proformance for the 2004 year. As part of these discussions, which are ongoing as of the date of this prospectus, OCIC has requested additional supporting documentation, and has initially raised issues with respect to approximately $2 million of loss adjustment expense, approximately $800,000 of commission expense, and approximately $600,000 of NJAIRE assessments, or a total of $3,412,000, allocated to OCNJ. We have recorded $4,350,000 (the difference between the $7,762,000 we notified OCNJ they owed us, and the $3,412,000 currently under discussion with OCIC) as replacement carrier revenue from related party in our consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2004 with respect to the OCIC replacement carrier transaction. We recorded $4,350,000 because that is managements best estimate of the amount for which we believe collectibility is reasonably assured based on several factors. First, the calculation to determine the amount owed by OCIC to us is complex and certain elements of the calculation are significantly dependent on managements estimates and judgment and thus more susceptible to challenge by OCIC. In addition, management cannot be certain that OCIC will not raise any additional issues beyond those of which we are presently aware and have itemized herein. OCNJ has until May 15, 2005 to make payment to us and may prior to that date raise additional issues and dispute other amounts. We also note our experience in the past in negotiating these issues with OCIC. For example, in 2003 we notified OCNJ that OCNJ owed Proformance approximately $10,100,000 for 2003. After negotiations we ultimately received $6,820,000. Accordingly, because of the nature of the calculation, the inherent subjectivity in establishing certain estimates upon which the calculation is based, and the fact that we have not yet reached final agreement with OCIC and OCNJ and they may raise additional issues until May 15, 2005, and our experience from 2003, managements best estimate of the amount for 2004 for which we believe collectibility from OCIC is reasonably assured is $4,350,000.
For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, the Company recognized additional consideration of $4,350,000, $6,820,000 and $0, respectively, as replacement carrier revenue in accordance with the terms of the contract.
As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, amounts due from OCNJ relating to the transaction amounted to $4,350,000 and $6,820,000, respectively. Deferred revenue relating to the contract was $0 as of each of December 31, 2004 and 2003.
Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company
On September 2, 2003, the Company entered into a replacement carrier agreement with Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company (Met) pursuant to which Met would transfer to Proformance the obligation to offer renewals for all of Mets New Jersey personal lines business, effective December 22,
F-18
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
2003. In accordance with the agreement, Met ceased issuing new personal lines policies in the State of New Jersey. As part of the withdrawal, Proformance became the replacement carrier for Met, providing Mets policyholders with a guaranteed option to renew their policies over a six month period. As part of the transaction, Met was required to pay Proformance consideration of $10,090,909 and purchase 430,000 shares of class B nonvoting stock for $10,000,000, which represented a 9% interest at the time of the transaction, based upon the Companys valuation. The Company recognized $560,606 as replacement carrier revenue from a related party for the year ended December 31, 2003. The remaining $9,530,303 was recorded as deferred revenue at December 31, 2003 and was fully earned during the year ended December 31, 2004.
Sentry Insurance Company
The Company entered into a replacement carrier agreement on March 14, 2003 with Sentry Insurance Mutual Company (Sentry) pursuant to which Sentry would transfer to Proformance the obligation to offer renewals for all of Sentrys New Jersey personal lines business, effective October 24, 2003. In accordance with the agreement, Sentry ceased issuing new personal lines policies in the State of New Jersey. As part of the withdrawal, Proformance became the replacement carrier for Sentry, providing Sentrys policyholders with a guaranteed option to renew their policies over a twelve month period. As part of the transaction, Sentry was required to pay the Company $3,500,000 in four equal quarterly installments of $875,000 with the first payment on October 24, 2003. At December 31, 2003 amounts due from Sentry relating to the transaction amounted to $2,625,000. The Company recognized $661,111 in replacement carrier revenue for the year ended December 31, 2003. In addition, deferred revenue relating to the contract amounted to $2,838,889 at December 31, 2003.
In addition, as part of the agreement, there is also a provisional amount due to the Company pursuant to which Sentry will pay to the Company up to $1,250,000 of additional consideration as necessary to reduce the premium-to-surplus ratio to 2.5 to 1 on the renewal business for a three year period based on calculations preformed at each calendar year-end. As the additional consideration depends on factors that do not exist or are not measurable at the inception of the agreement they are considered contingent and the additional consideration is recognized as actual results reflect a premium-to-surplus ratio of greater than 2.5 to 1. For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company recognized additional consideration of $1,250,000 and $0, respectively, as replacement carrier revenue in accordance with the terms of the contract. At December 31, 2004 the amount due from Sentry relating to the transaction was $1,250,000. On February 22, 2005 Proformance notified Sentry that Sentry owed Proformance $1,250,000 for the 2004 year in connection with the requirements that a premium-to-surplus ratio of 2.5 to 1 be maintained on the Sentry Renewal business, as discussed more fully in Business Recent Transactions Sentry Insurance Replacement Carrier Transaction. Pursuant to our agreement Sentry has until May 15, 2005 to make payment to us. Managements best estimate of the amount owed to Proformance is $1,250,000 for the 2004 year and as such we have recorded $1,250,000 of Replacement Carrier Revenue from unrelated party in our consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2004. The Company recognized $4,088,889 in replacement carrier revenue for the year ended December 31, 2004. Deferred revenue relating to the contract was $0 at December 31, 2004.
4. | Reinsurance Activity |
In the ordinary course of business, the Company reinsures certain risks with other companies. Such arrangements serve to limit the Companys maximum loss from catastrophes, large risks and unusually hazardous risks. To the extent that any reinsuring company is unable to meet its obligations, the Company would be liable for its respective participation in such defaulted amounts. The Company does not require or hold any collateral to secure the amounts recoverable. In addition the Company does not have any reinsurance treaties with retroactive adjustments or contingent commissions.
F-19
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, the Company reinsured its business through various excess of loss reinsurance agreements and catastrophe reinsurance agreements. The various excess of loss agreements provide protection for losses and loss adjustment expenses in excess of $250,000 per occurrence. Effective on July 1, 2003, the Company entered into a Multiple Line Loss Ratio Excess of Loss treaty. Under the terms of the treaty the Company retained the risk up to an ultimate net loss ratio of 80 percent of subject written premiums in force for the one six month term of the contract. The reinsurer assumes the risk for 11 percent of subject premiums in excess of 80 percent up to a maximum of $15,000,000. Any losses exceeding the reinsurers liability remains the liability of the company.
Under the terms of the contract, the Company was entitled to an experience rating adjustment based on reinsurance premiums paid net of ceding commissions and reinsurers margin, determined by a specific formula outline in the contract. The ceding enterprise should recognize an asset and the assuming enterprise should recognize a liability to the extent that any cash (or other consideration) would be payable from the assuming enterprise to the ceding enterprise based on experience to date under the contract. The Company commuted the contract effective December 31, 2003. In connection with the terms of the contract, which contained specific provisions to calculate amounts due to the ceding carrier, if any, upon commutation of the contract, the Company determined the reinsurer owed the Company $10,050,000 as of the date of the commutation. Accordingly, as of December 31, 2003, the Company accrued for a reinsurance receivable which was received on May 28, 2004 in the amount of $10,050,000 which represented a return of the premium ceded pursuant to this contract. The Company recorded this amount as a reinsurance receivable to accommodate this specific transaction and distinguish it from reinsurance recoverables that the Company uses to record reinsurance transactions, as part of its ongoing reinsurance activities. In connection with this commutation, the Company recognized the amounts received as a decrease in ceded written premium of $10,050,000.
A summary of reinsurance transactions is as follows:
For the years ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Written | Earned | Written | Earned | Written | Earned | ||||||||||||||||||||
Direct
|
$ | 207,320,350 | $ | 195,070,774 | $ | 163,178,887 | $ | 158,409,998 | $ | 114,624,256 | $ | 85,418,626 | |||||||||||||
Assumed
|
3,375,295 | 3,266,956 | 2,719,644 | 1,693,591 | 2,546,694 | 2,544,625 | |||||||||||||||||||
Gross
|
210,695,645 | 198,337,730 | 165,898,531 | 160,103,589 | 117,170,950 | 87,963,251 | |||||||||||||||||||
Ceded
|
(17,503,411 | ) | (18,671,009 | ) | (18,853,811 | ) | (16,947,666 | ) | (6,545,149 | ) | (12,309,368 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net
|
$ | 193,192,234 | $ | 179,666,721 | $ | 147,044,720 | $ | 143,155,923 | $ | 110,625,801 | $ | 75,653,883 | |||||||||||||
Reinsurance assumed relates to mandated premiums from the New Jersey Commercial Automobile Insurance Plan which we refer to as CAIP.
The Company reported reinsurance recoverables on paid losses and loss adjustment expenses of $9,740,821, $5,016,795 and $3,687,466 at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
The Company also reported reinsurance recoverables on unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses of approximately $24,936,000, $21,329,000 and $19,430,695 at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses ceded to reinsurers totaled $14,549,000, $16,822,000 and $16,172,000 at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
F-20
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Reinsurance recoverables on ceded paid and unpaid losses, loss adjustment expenses and ceded unearned premiums and reinsurance receivable from individual reinsurers in excess of 3 percent of the Companys equity were as follows (in thousands):
For the | For the | For the | ||||||||||
Year Ended | Year Ended | Year Ended | ||||||||||
December 31, | December 31, | December 31, | ||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
Gerling Global Reinsurance Corp. of America
|
$ | | $ | | $ | 7,087 | ||||||
Scor Reinsurance Company
|
9,595 | 8,176 | 5,600 | |||||||||
American Reinsurance
|
3,989 | 9,169 | 4,772 | |||||||||
Odyssey America Reinsurance
|
7,886 | 14,772 | 11,652 |
In 2002, the Company commuted an aggregate stop loss treaty with Odyssey American Reinsurance. The commutation was initiated and accrued for in December 2002 and the return premium was received on March 7, 2003 in the amount of $3,379,500. The commutation was recognized as a decrease in ceded premium. The Company recorded a net loss of $518,000 in connection with this transaction.
In 2003, the Company commuted all treaties held with Gerling Global Reinsurance Corporation (Gerling), due to credit downgrades and the financial deterioration of Gerling. In March 2003, The Company received $6,200,000 from Gerling in full settlement of their liability. The Company recognized the amount received as a reduction of reinsurance recoverables, ceded loss and loss adjustment expense reserves in the amount of $2,047,612, $3,805,535 and $346,853, respectively (thereby increasing net losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred) in the current year. The Company also decreased its net loss and loss adjustment expenses paid (thereby increasing net losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred) to recognize the effect of releasing Gerling from its obligations under the treaties. The Company recorded a net loss of $235,999 on the transaction.
On January 1, 2004, Proformance entered into a Commercial and Personal Excess Liability Excess of Loss Reinsurance Contract with Odyssey America Reinsurance Corporation (OdysseyRe). Under the terms of this contract, Proformance ceded $5,555,556 of written premiums to OdysseyRe as of December 31, 2004. On January 1, 2004, Mayfair entered into a reinsurance agreement with OdysseyRe whereby Mayfair would accept 100% of OdysseyRes share in the interests and liabilities under the contract issued to Proformance. Total assumed written premiums under this contract was $5,000,000 as of December 31, 2004.
On December 31, 2004, Proformance commuted the Commercial and Personal Excess Liability Excess of Loss Reinsurance Contract with OdysseyRe. The commutation was initiated and accrued for in December 2004 and the return premium was received on January 21, 2005 in the amount of $4,750,000. The transaction was recorded as a decrease in ceded written premiums in the amount of $5,555,556 and a decrease in ceded commissions of $555,556. Proformance recognized a loss of $250,000 in connection with this transaction. On December 31, 2004, the reinsurance agreement between OdysseyRe and Mayfair was commuted. The transaction was recorded as a decrease in assumed written premiums in the amount of $5,000,000.
F-21
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
5. | Reserves for Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses |
The changes in unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses are summarized as follows (000s omitted):
For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||
Balance as of beginning of period
|
$ | 134,201 | $ | 85,472 | $ | 56,732 | |||||||
Less reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses
|
(21,329 | ) | (19,431 | ) | (26,718 | ) | |||||||
Net balance as of beginning of period
|
112,872 | 66,041 | 30,014 | ||||||||||
Incurred related to:
|
|||||||||||||
Current period
|
135,659 | 108,047 | 60,861 | ||||||||||
Prior period
|
(672 | ) | 76 | 8,630 | |||||||||
Total incurred
|
134,987 | 108,123 | 69,491 | ||||||||||
Paid related to:
|
|||||||||||||
Current period
|
44,899 | 37,594 | 20,114 | ||||||||||
Prior period
|
43,613 | 23,698 | 13,350 | ||||||||||
Total paid
|
88,512 | 61,292 | 33,464 | ||||||||||
Net balance as of end of period
|
159,347 | 112,872 | 66,041 | ||||||||||
Plus reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses
|
24,936 | 21,329 | 19,431 | ||||||||||
Balance as of end of period
|
$ | 184,283 | $ | 134,201 | $ | 85,472 | |||||||
As a result of changes in estimates of insured events in prior years, incurred losses in prior years increased by approximately $76,000 in 2003 and $8,630,000 in 2002 because of higher than anticipated losses on the private passenger automobile, automobile physical damage and commercial automobile liability, as well as reserve strengthening during 2002 and 2001. The incurred losses related to prior years of $76,000 in 2003 included the previously discussed, Gerling commutation loss of $235,999 which was offset by favorable loss development on prior accident year reserves. For the year ended December 31, 2004, we reduced reserves for prior years by $672,000 due to the fact that the actual loss experience observed during the period, especially during the fourth quarter of 2004, was slightly lower than expected due to a reduction in the frequency of claims reported during the fourth quarter of 2004.
Environmental Reserves The Companys exposure to environmental claims arises solely from the sale of Homeowners policies. The exposure to environmental claims which may also be referred to as pollution, hazardous waste, or environmental impairment liability was due to leakage of underground fuel storage tanks, which contaminated the surrounding soil and ground water.
The Company establishes full case reserves for all reported environmental claims. Reserves for losses incurred but not reported (IBNR) include a provision for development of reserves on reported losses. The Companys IBNR reserves are established based on a review of a number of actuarial analyses.
F-22
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The table balance represents the loss activity related to environmental exposures for the periods ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 (000s omitted):
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||
Environmental, Gross of Reinsurance
|
|||||||||||||
Beginning Reserves including case,
bulk and IBNR, and LAE
|
$ | 743 | $ | 650 | $ | 471 | |||||||
Losses and LAE incurred
|
888 | 186 | 699 | ||||||||||
Calendar year payments for losses and LAE
|
739 | 93 | 520 | ||||||||||
Ending reserves including case, bulk
and IBNR, and LAE
|
892 | 743 | 650 | ||||||||||
Environmental, net of reinsurance
|
|||||||||||||
Beginning Reserves including case,
bulk and IBNR, and LAE
|
$ | 454 | $ | 381 | $ | 114 | |||||||
Losses and LAE incurred
|
705 | 146 | 439 | ||||||||||
Calendar year payments for losses and LAE
|
525 | 73 | 171 | ||||||||||
Ending reserves including case, bulk
and IBNR, and LAE
|
634 | 454 | 381 |
6. | Income Taxes |
The Company and its subsidiaries file a consolidated Federal income tax return.
The components of the provision (benefit) for income taxes on income for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 are as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||
Taxes on income before income taxes:
|
|||||||||||||
Current taxes
|
$ | 4,953,669 | $ | 457,640 | $ | | |||||||
Deferred taxes
|
3,932,128 | 9,487,562 | 2,822,353 | ||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 8,885,797 | $ | 9,945,202 | $ | 2,822,353 | |||||||
The components of deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are as follows as of December 31, 2004 and 2003:
For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
2004 | 2003 | ||||||||
Deferred tax assets:
|
|||||||||
20% UPR adjustment
|
$ | 4,340,295 | $ | 3,160,948 | |||||
Loss reserve discount
|
5,273,257 | 3,424,851 | |||||||
Bad debt reserve
|
279,344 | 169,995 | |||||||
Unrealized losses
|
282,675 | ||||||||
Incentive stock options
|
453,334 | 289,871 | |||||||
GAAP reserve differentials
|
| 3,400,000 | |||||||
Prepaid reinsurance
|
| 1,255,842 | |||||||
Deferred tax assets
|
10,346,230 | 11,984,182 | |||||||
Deferred tax liability:
|
|||||||||
Deferred acquisition costs
|
3,696,439 | 3,328,304 | |||||||
Accrual of bond discount
|
31,358 | 8,351 | |||||||
Deferred revenues
|
18,227,709 | 12,118,184 |
F-23
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
2004 | 2003 | ||||||||
Prepaid expenses
|
97,287 | | |||||||
Unrealized gains
|
93,826 | 312,032 | |||||||
Due & Accrued dividends
|
11,863 | 17,487 | |||||||
Depreciation
|
183,088 | 143,714 | |||||||
Accrued income reinsurance recoverable
|
| 3,817,000 | |||||||
Reinsurance payable
|
| 237,853 | |||||||
Deferred tax liabilities
|
22,341,570 | 19,982,925 | |||||||
Net deferred tax liabilities
|
$ | (11,995,340 | ) | $ | (7,998,743 | ) | |||
The income tax rate reconciliation for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 is as follows (000s omitted):
For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre Tax Net Income
|
$ | 26,334 | $ | 29,013 | $ | 11,456 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income Tax Statutory Rate
|
8,954 | 34.00 | % | 9,864 | 34.00 | % | 3,895 | 34.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
Tax Exempt Interest
|
(596 | ) | (2.26 | )% | (230 | ) | (0.79 | )% | (11 | ) | (0.10 | )% | ||||||||||||
DRD
|
(33 | ) | (0.13 | )% | (54 | ) | (0.19 | )% | (8 | ) | (0.07 | )% | ||||||||||||
Proration
|
94 | 0.36 | % | 43 | 0.15 | % | 3 | 0.03 | % | |||||||||||||||
Life insurance expense
|
27 | 0.10 | % | 27 | 0.09 | % | | 0.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
State taxes
|
434 | 1.65 | % | 399 | 1.38 | % | | 0.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
Release of valuation allowance
|
| 0.00 | % | | 0.00 | % | (1,161 | ) | (10.13 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Other
|
6 | 0.02 | % | (104 | ) | (0.36 | )% | 104 | 0.91 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total income tax expense
|
$ | 8,886 | 33.74 | % | $ | 9,945 | 34.28 | % | $ | 2,822 | 24.63 | % | ||||||||||||
Income tax provision in 2002 was less than the amount of tax computed using the statutory tax rate primarily due to the reduction in the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets. The valuation allowance of $1,161,000 was originally recorded in 2000 and related to net operating losses arising from the Niagara subsidiary. Due to Niagaras history of losses it was determined that it was more likely than not that the asset would not be recovered. However, due to the tax law changes enacted in 2002 that allowed for a 5 year carry-back of the net operating losses generated in 2001, the Niagara net operating loss was fully utilized in 2002.
F-24
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
7. | Property and Equipment |
A summary of property and equipment is as follows:
For the Years Ended | ||||||||
December 31, | ||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||
Automobiles
|
$ | 463,656 | $ | 264,682 | ||||
Computer Software
|
822,545 | 44,374 | ||||||
Furniture & fixtures
|
617,790 | 560,972 | ||||||
Leasehold improvements
|
143,966 | 117,480 | ||||||
Electronic data equipment
|
1,936,350 | 1,629,335 | ||||||
3,984,307 | 2,616,843 | |||||||
Less: Accumulated depreciation
|
1,962,873 | 1,534,951 | ||||||
Net property and equipment
|
$ | 2,021,434 | $ | 1,081,892 | ||||
Depreciation and amortization expense amounted to $427,922, $312,351 and $285,250 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
8. | Capital Transactions |
As discussed in Note 3, on December 8, 2003, the Company issued 430,000 shares of Class B Non-voting Common Stock to Met for $10,000,000.
On August 1, 2003 the company made a private offering to certain former personal lines agents of OCNJ. The offering was of up to 215,000 shares at $23.26 per share of nonvoting Class B common stock. At the end of 2003, 107,500 shares were issued at $23.26 per share to the former agents of OCNJ.
During 2002, the Company cancelled 45,150 shares of Class A Voting Common Stock and reissued 45,150 shares of Class B Non-voting Common Stock.
As discussed further in Note 3, the company sold 867,955 shares of Class B Non-voting Common shares to OCIC which was valued by the Company at $13,500,000 at the time of the transaction. This represented 19.71 percent of the outstanding shares of the Company at December 18, 2001.
Pursuant to an investor rights agreement entered into between OCIC and NAHC on December 18, 2001, OCIC had a right to require NAHC to redeem all equity securities of NAHC owned by OCIC for fair market value at any time (i) on or after December 18, 2006 or (ii) prior to December 18, 2006 if NAHC delivers notice of a change in control event as defined in the agreement. On July 10, 2004, OCIC and NAHC entered into an agreement which would facilitate the sale by OCIC of shares of common stock of NAHC owned by OCIC that have an aggregate value of equal to at least 10% of the aggregate value of all shares of common stock sold by NAHC as part of an initial public offering. In exchange for the foregoing, OCIC agreed to waive its redemption right. As such, the related common stock is considered capital.
9. | Stock Options |
During 1995, the Company developed a stock option plan for key management employees and directors. Options are exercisable when the earliest of the following events occur: three years from date of issuance, date of retirement or expiration of the Directors term, date of change of control, or the date of an offering of its shares through an initial public offering. The options expire 10 years after the date of grant. The options are also nontransferable and contain further restrictions imposed after the options have
F-25
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
vested. If options are exercised then the shareholders cannot transfer their shares unless the transfer is permitted by the Company and the Company has first right to purchase all or any of the shares offered for sale. These restrictions have been taken into account when determining the fair value of the stock.
The following table summarizes information with respect to stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2004:
Weighted | |||||||||
Number of | Average | ||||||||
Options | Exercise Price | ||||||||
Balance Outstanding at January 1, 2002
|
582,650 | $ | 1.88 | ||||||
Granted
|
47,300 | 0.60 | |||||||
Exercised
|
| | |||||||
Forfeited
|
| | |||||||
Balance Outstanding at December 31, 2002
|
629,950 | 1.79 | |||||||
Granted
|
43,000 | 6.14 | |||||||
Exercised
|
| | |||||||
Forfeited
|
| | |||||||
Balance Outstanding at December 31, 2003
|
672,950 | 2.06 | |||||||
Granted
|
| | |||||||
Exercised
|
| | |||||||
Forfeited
|
| | |||||||
Balance Outstanding at December 31, 2004
|
672,950 | $ | 2.06 | ||||||
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
Weighted average fair value of options granted
(per option)
|
$ | 0.00 | $ | 19.14 | $ | 15.13 | ||||||
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2004:
Options Outstanding | Options Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||
Range of | Number of | Contractual | Average | Number of | Average | |||||||||||||||
Exercise | Stock | Life | Exercise | Stock | Exercise | |||||||||||||||
Prices | Options | (in years) | Price | Options | Price | |||||||||||||||
$0.60
|
47,300 | 7.44 | $ | 0.60 | 47,300 | $ | 0.60 | |||||||||||||
0.98 - 1.29
|
303,150 | 2.09 | 1.20 | 303,150 | 1.20 | |||||||||||||||
2.50 - 2.89
|
279,500 | 3.23 | 2.62 | 279,500 | 2.62 | |||||||||||||||
6.14
|
43,000 | 8.28 | 6.14 | | | |||||||||||||||
672,950 | 3.34 | $ | 2.06 | 629,950 | $ | 1.79 | ||||||||||||||
F-26
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2003:
Options Outstanding | Options Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||
Range of | Number | Contractual | Average | Number | Average | |||||||||||||||
Exercise | of Stock | Life | Exercise | of Stock | Exercise | |||||||||||||||
Prices | Options | (in years) | Price | Options | Price | |||||||||||||||
$0.60
|
47,300 | 8.45 | $ | 0.60 | | $ | | |||||||||||||
0.98 - 1.29
|
303,150 | 3.10 | 1.20 | 240,800 | 1.25 | |||||||||||||||
2.50 - 2.89
|
279,500 | 4.23 | 2.62 | 279,500 | 2.62 | |||||||||||||||
6.14
|
43,000 | 9.28 | 6.14 | | | |||||||||||||||
672,950 | 4.34 | $ | 2.06 | 520,300 | $ | 1.99 | ||||||||||||||
The number of exercisable stock options outstanding at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 were 629,950, 520,300 and 520,300 respectively. The weighted average exercise price of exercisable stock options outstanding at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $1.79, $1.99 and $1.99, respectively.
Compensation expense recorded in connection with the options issued during 2003 was $245,340 and $184,005 for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The unamortized deferred compensation in connection with these options was $306,675 and $552,015 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Compensation expense recorded in connection with the options issued during 2002 was $235,433, $235,432 and $117,717 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The unamortized deferred compensation in connection with these options was $117,717, $353,150 and 588,582 as of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
The company is not authorized to grant additional options as of December 18, 2004.
10. | Contingencies and Commitments |
Litigation The Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary course of its business. The Company accounts for such activity through the establishment of unpaid claims and claim adjustment expense reserves. Management does not believe that the outcome of any of those matters will have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial position, operating results or cash flows.
Operating Leases The Company has entered into a seven-year lease agreement for the use of office space and equipment. The most significant obligations under the lease terms other than the base rent are the reimbursement of the Companys share of the operating expenses of the premises, which include real estate taxes, repairs and maintenance, utilities, and insurance. Net rent expense for 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $919,058, $743,200 and $475,710, respectively.
The Company entered into a four-year lease agreement for the use of additional office space and equipment commencing on September 11, 2004. Rent expense for the period from September 11, 2004 through December 31, 2004 was $70,800.
F-27
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Aggregate minimum rental commitments of the Company as of December 31, 2004 are as follows:
Year | Amount | |||
2005
|
898,383 | |||
2006
|
906,775 | |||
2007
|
914,467 | |||
2008
|
845,240 | |||
2009 and thereafter
|
578,499 | |||
Total
|
$ | 4,143,364 | ||
In connection with the lease agreement, the Company executed a letter of credit in the amount of $300,000 as security for payment of the base rent.
Guaranty Fund and Assessment The Company is subject to guaranty fund and other assessments by the State of New Jersey. The Company is also assigned private passenger automobile and commercial automobile risks by the State of New Jersey for those who cannot obtain insurance in the primary market.
New Jersey law requires that property and casualty insurers licensed to do business in New Jersey participate in the New Jersey Property-Liability Insurance Guaranty Association (which we refer to as NJPLIGA). Members of NJPLIGA are assessed the amount NJPLIGA deems necessary to pay its obligations and its expenses in connection with handling covered claims. Assessments are made in the proportion that each members direct written property and casualty premiums for the prior calendar year compared to the corresponding direct written premiums for NJPLIGA members for the same period. NJPLIGA notifies the insurer of the surcharge to the policyholders, which is used to fund the assessment as a percentage of premiums on an annual basis. The Company collects these amounts on behalf of the NJPLIGA and there is no income statement impact. Historically, requests for remittance of the assessments are levied 12-14 months after the end of a policy year. The Company remits the amount to NJPLIGA within 45 days of the assessment request.
For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, Proformance was assessed $1,828,285 and $407,947, respectively, as its portion of the losses due to insolvencies of certain insurers. We anticipate that there will be additional assessments from time to time relating to insolvencies of various insurance companies. We are allowed to re-coup these assessments from our policyholders over time until we have recovered all such payments. In the event that the required assessment is greater than the amount accrued for via surcharges, the Company has the ability to increase its surcharge percentage to re-coup that amount.
A summary of NJPLIGA balances and amounts is as follows:
As of December 31, | ||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
Payable
|
$ | 2,283,093 | $ | 486,548 | $ | 382,369 | ||||||
Paid
|
2,370,085 | | $ | 124,394 |
The Personal Automobile Insurance Plan, or PAIP, is a plan designed to provide personal automobile coverage to drivers unable to obtain private passenger auto insurance in the voluntary market and to provide for the equitable assignment of PAIP liabilities to all licensed insurers writing personal automobile insurance in New Jersey. We may be assigned PAIP business by the state in an amount equal to the proportion that our net direct written premiums on personal auto business for the prior calendar year compares to the corresponding net direct written premiums for all personal auto business written in New Jersey for such year.
The State of New Jersey allows property and casualty companies to enter into Limited Assignment Distribution (LAD) agreements to transfer PAIP assignments to another insurance carrier approved by the State of New Jersey to handle this type of transaction. The LAD carrier is responsible for handling all of
F-28
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
the premium and loss transactions arising from PAIP assignments. In turn, the buy-out company pays the LAD carrier a fee based on a percentage of the buy-out companys premium quota for a specific year. This transaction is not treated as a reinsurance transaction on the buy-out companys book but as an expense. In the event the LAD carrier does not perform its responsibilities, the Company will not have any liability associated with the assignments.
We have entered into a LAD agreement pursuant to which the PAIP business assigned to us by the state are transferred to Clarendon National Insurance Company and Auto One Insurance Company which writes and services the business in exchange for an agreed upon fee. Upon the transfer, we have no liabilities with respect to such PAIP business. For the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 the Company was assessed LAD fees of $1,189,068 and $353,832, respectively, in connection with payments to Clarendon National Insurance Company under the LAD agreement. For the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company was assessed LAD fees of $653,993 and $171,063 in connection with payments made to Clarendon National Insurance Company and Auto One Insurance Company, respectively, under separate LAD Agreements. For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, the Company would have been assigned $9,348,729, $8,977,000 and $2,200,000 of premium respectively, by the State of New Jersey under PAIP, if not for the LAD agreements that were in place. These amounts served as the basis for the fees to be paid to the LAD carriers.
The Commercial Automobile Insurance Plan, or CAIP, is a plan similar to PAIP, but involving commercial auto insurance rather than private passenger auto insurance. Private passenger vehicles cannot be insured by CAIP if they are eligible for coverage under PAIP or if they are owned by an eligible person as defined under New Jersey law. We are assessed an amount in respect of CAIP liabilities equal to the proportion that our net direct written premiums on commercial auto business for the prior calendar year compares to the corresponding direct written premiums for commercial auto business written in New Jersey for such year.
Proformance records its CAIP assignment on its books as assumed business as required by the State of New Jersey. For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, the Company has been assigned $2,492,048, $2,041,173 and $3,113,098 of premiums, and $1,238,971, $810,092 and $1,355,445 of losses, respectively, by the State of New Jersey under the CAIP. On a quarterly basis, the State of New Jersey remits a member participation report and cash settlement report. The net result of premiums assigned less paid losses, losses and loss adjustment expenses and other expenses plus investment income results in a net cash settlement due to or from the participating member. The reserving related to these assignments is calculated by the State of New Jersey with corresponding entries recorded on the Companys Financial Statements.
New Jersey Automobile Insurance Risk Exchange
The New Jersey Automobile Insurance Risk Exchange, or NJAIRE, is a plan designed to compensate member companies for claims paid for non-economic losses and claims adjustment expenses which would not have been incurred had the tort limitation option provided under New Jersey insurance law been elected by the injured party filing the claim for non-economic losses. As a member company of NJAIRE, we submit information with respect to the number of claims reported to us that meet the criteria outlined above. NJAIRE compiles the information submitted by all member companies and remits assessments to each member company for this exposure. The Company, since its inception, has never received compensation from NJAIRE as a result of its participation in the plan. The Companys participation in NJAIRE is mandated by the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance. The assessments that the Company has received required payment to NJAIRE for the amounts assessed. The Company records the assessments received as other operating and general expenses. For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, we have been assessed $3,244,518, $518,018, and $380,635, respectively, by NJAIRE.
F-29
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
These assessments represent amounts to be paid to NJAIRE as it relates to the Companys participation in its plan.
11. | Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
The tax effect of other comprehensive income is as follows:
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Before Tax | Tax | Net of Tax | ||||||||||
For the Period Ended December 31, 2004 | Amount | Effect | Amount | |||||||||
Net holding gains arising during the year
|
$ | 683 | $ | (232 | ) | $ | 451 | |||||
Less reclassification adjustment for net realized
gains included in net income
|
(494 | ) | 168 | (326 | ) | |||||||
Other comprehensive income
|
$ | 189 | $ | (64 | ) | $ | 125 | |||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Before Tax | Tax | Net of Tax | ||||||||||
For the Year Ended December 31, 2003 | Amount | Effect | Amount | |||||||||
Net holding gains arising during the year
|
$ | 95 | $ | (32 | ) | $ | 63 | |||||
Less reclassification adjustment for net realized
gains included in net income
|
(536 | ) | 182 | (354 | ) | |||||||
Other comprehensive loss
|
$ | (441 | ) | $ | 150 | $ | (291 | ) | ||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Before Tax | Tax | Net of Tax | ||||||||||
For the Year Ended December 31, 2002 | Amount | Effect | Amount | |||||||||
Net holding gains arising during the year
|
$ | 671 | $ | (230 | ) | $ | 441 | |||||
Less reclassification adjustment for net realized
gains included in net income
|
(68 | ) | 25 | (43 | ) | |||||||
Other comprehensive income
|
$ | 603 | $ | (205 | ) | $ | 398 | |||||
12. | Statutory Surplus |
Proformance, which is domiciled in New Jersey, prepares its statutory financial statements in accordance with accounting principles and practices prescribed or permitted by the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance, the recognized authority for determining solvency under the New Jersey insurance law. The commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance has the right to permit other practices that may deviate from prescribed practices. Prescribed statutory accounting practices are those practices that are incorporated directly or by reference in state laws, regulations, and general administrative rules applicable to all insurance enterprises domiciled in New Jersey. Permitted statutory accounting practices that are not prescribed may differ from company to company within a state, and may change in the future.
Generally accepted accounting principles differ in certain respects from the accounting practices prescribed or permitted by insurance regulatory authorities (statutory basis). Based on amounts included in the original filings of the annual statements for the respective years, statutory surplus including the effects of the prescribed and permitted practices, was $61,931,452, $58,245,092 and $37,106,900 at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Subsequent to the original filings of the 2003 and 2002 annual statements, management identified certain adjustments related to loss reserves, salary accruals and contingent commissions which, if recorded
F-30
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
at the proper time, would have impacted the amounts as filed. Such amounts would have reduced statutory surplus by $1,174,351 and $12,279,375 at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. As a result of these adjustments, there were no regulatory actions taken or penalties assessed to the Company.
The Companys statutory financial statements are presented on the basis of accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance. New Jersey has adopted the National Association of Insurance Commissioners statutory accounting practices as its statutory accounting practices, except that it has retained the prescribed practice of writing off goodwill immediately to statutory surplus in the year of acquisition. In addition, the commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance has the right to permit other specific practices that may deviate from prescribed practices.
13. | Dividends from Subsidiaries |
The funding of the cash requirements of National Atlantic Holdings Corporation is primarily provided by cash dividends from its subsidiaries. Dividends paid by Proformance are restricted by regulatory requirements of the State of New Jersey. Generally, the maximum dividend that may be paid without prior regulatory approval is limited to the greater of 10 percent of statutory surplus (shareholders equity on a statutory basis) or 100 percent of net income (excluding realized capital gains) for the prior year. Dividends exceeding these limitations can be made subject to approval by state insurance departments. In addition, dividends must be paid from unassigned funds which must not reflect a deficit. Proformance is not permitted to pay any dividends without the approval of the Commissioner as it has negative unassigned surplus as a result of historical underwriting losses. No dividends from Proformance were paid for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 as the unassigned funds were $(24,471,562), $(20,935,121) and $(24,991,243), respectively. In addition, Bermuda legislation imposes limitations on the dividends Mayfair is permitted to pay, based on minimum capital and solvency requirements. In connection with these limitations, Mayfair did not pay any dividends for the year ended December 31, 2004. The non-insurance subsidiaries paid cash dividends to National Atlantic Holdings Corporation of $2,650,000, $1,667,937 and $500,000 in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
14. | Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
SFAS No. 107, Disclosure About Fair Value of Financial Instruments, requires the Company to disclose the estimated fair value of financial instruments, both assets and liabilities, recognized and not recognized in the consolidated balance sheets for which it is practical to estimate fair value.
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value:
Cash and Short Term Investments. For short-term instruments, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Investment in Securities. For investments in securities, fair values are based on quoted market prices or dealer quotes, if available. If a quoted market price is not available, fair value is estimated using quoted market prices for similar securities.
F-31
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The statement value and estimated fair value of financial instruments are as follows:
As of December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||
Statement | Estimated | Statement | Estimated | |||||||||||||
Value | Fair Value | Value | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Fixed maturities
|
$ | 210,830,067 | $ | 210,830,067 | $ | 130,409,462 | $ | 130,409,462 | ||||||||
Short-term investments
|
13,820,488 | 13,820,488 | 31,569,445 | 31,569,445 | ||||||||||||
Equity Securities
|
12,800,535 | 12,800,535 | 8,593,084 | 8,593,084 |
15. | Net Earnings Per Share |
Basic net income per share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year. Diluted net income per share includes the dilutive effect of outstanding share options, using the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, exercise of options is assumed with the proceeds used to purchase common stock at the average price for the period. The difference between the number of shares issued and the number of shares purchased represents the dilutive shares.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||
(in thousands, except for share | ||||||||||||||
and per share data) | ||||||||||||||
Net income applicable to common stockholders
|
$ | 17,448 | $ | 19,068 | $ | 8,634 | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares basic
|
4,941,990 | 4,448,684 | 4,404,490 | |||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
||||||||||||||
Options
|
672,950 | 613,235 | 557,549 | |||||||||||
Weighted average common shares diluted
|
5,614,940 | 5,061,919 | 4,962,039 | |||||||||||
Basic earnings per share
|
$ | 3.53 | $ | 4.29 | $ | 1.96 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per share
|
$ | 3.11 | $ | 3.77 | $ | 1.74 | ||||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2004, the amount of Effect of dilutive securities: Options above represents the total amount of options outstanding without using the treasury stock method.
16. | Notes Payable |
On December 4, 1997, the Company entered into a loan agreement with Gerling Global Reinsurance Company of America (Gerling). The amount of the indebtedness was $3,000,000 and was written at a variable interest rate. The Base Rate was the six month LIBOR rate plus an applicable margin of 7%. The term of the obligation required repayment in full within six years with semi-annual payments of interest only. The following principal payments were required on December 4 of each year starting in 2000; $600,000, $720,000, $840,000 and $840,000. At December 31, 2000, the Company was unable to make the scheduled principal repayment. On January 11, 2001, Gerling agreed to modify the loan agreement, delaying the principal repayments for one year. In return for that forbearance, the Company agreed to increase the interest rate by 2 percentage points. In addition, Gerling agreed to allow the Company to postpone the initial principal payment scheduled for December 2001 until January 2002, when payment was made.
The outstanding principal balance of this obligation as of December 31, 2001 was $3,000,000; the loan was paid in full in December of 2002.
F-32
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
On December 30, 1997, the Company entered into a loan agreement with the National Cooperative Bank (NCB). The amount of the indebtedness was $3,000,000 and the interest rate was fixed at closing based on the 5 year US Treasury index plus 400 basis points for the first (5) years, and then the 5 year treasury index plus 390 basis points for the balance of the term. The term of the loan was 11 years with interest only paid quarterly for the first year. Quarterly principal reductions of $210,000 were to commence January of 2000 and continue to and including January of 2008 with a final principal payment of $1,110,000 plus all accrued interest on January 1, 2009. As of December 31, 2001, the outstanding principal balance of this obligation was $2,392,782; the loan was paid in full in March of 2002.
Interest expense related to these obligations was $338,725 in 2002.
17. | Related Party Disclosure |
The Company has entered into material transactions with related parties. These transactions are comprised of share repurchase agreements with Met and James V. Gorman, Chairman and CEO of NAHC and Proformance, Investor Rights Agreements with OCIC and James V. Gorman, Non-Compete agreements with Ohio Casualty Insurance Company and payments to insurance agencies affiliated with members of NAHCs directors.
The share repurchase agreement with Met restricts Met from transferring shares for a period of two years from the date of the repurchase agreement without NAHCs prior consent. After the two year period but prior to an Initial Public Offering, NAHC has the right to purchase all shares from Met pursuant to the price and terms per the agreement. Prior to a public offering, Met also has a co-sale right, to have its pro-rata portion of common stock sold should Mr. Gorman elect to sell common stock. This co-sale right and NAHCs right of first offer will both terminate upon completion of an Initial Public Offering. If prior to December 8, 2008, NAHC shall issue or sell shares of common stock for consideration less than the purchase price paid by Met, then Met shall have the right to purchase additional shares for the same consideration paid by the third party, in order to maintain their ownership percentage immediately prior to the issuance or sale of common stock.
In connection with the Ohio Casualty replacement carrier transaction, Proformance entered into a non-competition agreement with OCIC which prohibits Proformance from writing commercial lines insurance policies until December 31, 2004 where the expiring policy was issued by Ohio Casualty Group.
NAHC, OCIC and James Gorman also have an investor rights agreement which provides the other with the right of first offer should NAHC issue securities or OCIC desire to transfer their equity securities. OCIC also has the right of co-sale within certain parameters should James Gorman sell equity securities. This is not effective for certain qualified public offerings such as an Initial Public Offering.
The Company has also made payments to insurance agencies affiliated with certain of the Companys directors.
For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, Proformance paid to Connelly-Campion-Wright Insurance Agency commissions of $406,465, $287,986 and $138,317, respectively. Mr. Campion, served as Vice-Chairman of our board of directors, and as Chief Executive Officer of Connelly-Campion-Wright Insurance Agency during each of these years.
For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, Proformance paid to Liberty Insurance Associates, Inc. commissions of $197,433, $220,605 and $160,414, respectively. Mr. Harris, a member of our board of directors, is Chief Executive Officer of Liberty Insurance Associates.
For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, Proformance paid to Fleet Insurance Services commissions of $104,521, $104,941 and $116,434, respectively. Mr. Sharkey, a member of our board of directors, is Chairman of Fleet Insurance Services.
F-33
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
In connection with the Commercial and Personal Excess Liability Excess of Loss Reinsurance Contract between Proformance and OdysseyRe and the reinsurance agreement between OdysseyRe and Mayfair as outlined in Note 4, these transactions are eliminated for GAAP reporting purposes as part of the Companys consolidated financial results.
18. | Initial Public Offering and Stock Split |
Management announced plans for the sale of the Companys common shares in a proposed initial public offering (the IPO) in 2005. In conjunction with the IPO, the Board of Directors of the Company declared a 43-for-1 common share split which became effective on January 14, 2005 immediately after the time the Company filed its amended and restated articles of incorporation. All earnings per share and other share amounts for the periods presented in the consolidated financial statements have been adjusted retroactively for the share split.
F-34
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the Requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
NATIONAL ATLANTIC HOLDINGS CORPORATION |
||||
By: | /s/ James V. Gorman | |||
James V. Gorman | ||||
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
Dated: April 27, 2005
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature | Title | Date | ||
/s/ James
V. Gorman James V. Gorman |
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer (Principle Executive Officer) | April 27, 2005 | ||
/s/ Frank
J. Prudente Frank J. Prudente |
Executive Vice President Corporate Finance (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | April 27, 2005 | ||
/s/ Peter
A. Cappello, Jr. Peter A. Cappello, Jr. |
Director | April 27, 2005 | ||
/s/ Andrew
C. Harris
Andrew C. Harris |
Director | April 27, 2005 | ||
/s/ Thomas
J. Sharkey, Sr.
Thomas J. Sharkey, Sr. |
Director | April 27, 2005 | ||
/s/ Steven
V. Stallone
Steven V. Stallone |
Director | April 27, 2005 | ||
/s/ Thomas
M. Mulhare
Thomas M. Mulhare |
Director | April 27, 2005 | ||
/s/ Candace
L. Straight
Candace L. Straight |
Director | April 27, 2005 |