Back to GetFilings.com
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
---------
FORM 10-K
[X] Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 For the Fiscal Year Ended December 25, 2004
or
[ ] Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (No Fee Required)
For the transition period from ________ to ________
Commission file number 333-80361-01
BOTTLING GROUP, LLC
(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
ORGANIZED IN DELAWARE 13-4042452
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF (I.R.S. EMPLOYER
INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION) IDENTIFICATION NO.)
ONE PEPSI WAY
SOMERS, NEW YORK 10589
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (914) 767-6000
---------------------------
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT: NONE
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT: NONE
INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT: (1) HAS FILED ALL REPORTS
REQUIRED TO BE FILED BY SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 DURING THE PRECEDING 12 MONTHS (OR FOR SUCH SHORTER PERIOD THAT THE
REGISTRANT WAS REQUIRED TO FILE SUCH REPORTS) AND (2) HAS BEEN SUBJECT TO SUCH
FILING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PAST 90 DAYS. YES [X] NO [ ]
INDICATE BY CHECK MARK IF DISCLOSURE OF DELINQUENT FILERS PURSUANT TO ITEM
405 OF REGULATION S-K IS NOT CONTAINED HEREIN, AND WILL NOT BE CONTAINED, TO THE
BEST OF REGISTRANT'S KNOWLEDGE, IN DEFINITIVE PROXY OR INFORMATION STATEMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE IN PART III OF THIS FORM 10-K OR ANY AMENDMENT TO THIS
FORM 10-K. [X]
INDICATE BY CHECKMARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT IS AN ACCELERATED FILER (AS
DEFINED IN EXCHANGE ACT RULE 12b-2). YES [ ] NO [x]
THE AGGREGATE MARKET VALUE OF BOTTLING GROUP, LLC CAPITAL STOCK HELD BY
NON-AFFILIATES OF BOTTLING GROUP, LLC AS OF JUNE 12, 2004 WAS $ 0.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
INTRODUCTION
Bottling Group, LLC ("Bottling LLC") is the principal operating subsidiary
of The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc. ("PBG") and consists of substantially all of
the operations and assets of PBG. Bottling LLC, which is fully consolidated by
PBG, consists of bottling operations located in the United States, Canada,
Spain, Greece, Russia, Turkey and Mexico. Prior to its formation, Bottling LLC
was an operating unit of PepsiCo, Inc. ("PepsiCo"). When used in this Report,
"Bottling LLC," "we," "us" and "our" each refers to Bottling Group, LLC and,
where appropriate, its subsidiaries.
PBG was incorporated in Delaware in January, 1999, as a wholly owned
subsidiary of PepsiCo to effect the separation of most of PepsiCo's
company-owned bottling businesses. PBG became a publicly traded company on March
31, 1999. As of January 22, 2005, PepsiCo's ownership represented 42.7% of the
outstanding common stock and 100% of the outstanding Class B common stock,
together representing 47.9% of the voting power of all classes of PBG's voting
stock.
PepsiCo and PBG contributed bottling businesses and assets used in the
bottling business to Bottling LLC in connection with the formation of Bottling
LLC. As a result of the contributions of assets and other subsequent
transactions, PBG owns 93.2% and PepsiCo owns the remaining 6.8% as of December
25, 2004.
PBG has made available, free of charge, the following governance materials
on its website at http://www.pbg.com under Investor Relations - Company
Information - Corporate Governance: PBG's Corporate Governance Principles and
Practices, PBG's Worldwide Code of Conduct, PBG's Director Independence Policy,
PBG's Audit and Affiliated Transactions Committee Charter, PBG's Compensation
and Management Development Committee Charter, PBG's Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee Charter and PBG's Disclosure Committee Charter. These
governance materials are available in print, free of charge, to any PBG
shareholder upon request.
PRINCIPAL PRODUCTS
We are the world's largest manufacturer, seller and distributor of
Pepsi-Cola beverages. The beverages sold by us include PEPSI-COLA, DIET PEPSI,
MOUNTAIN DEW, AQUAFINA, SIERRA MIST, DIET MOUNTAIN DEW, LIPTON BRISK, SOBE,
STARBUCKS FRAPPUCCINO and TROPICANA JUICE DRINKS and, outside the U.S.,
PEPSI-COLA, 7 UP, KAS, MIRINDA and AQUA MINERALE. In some of our territories, we
have the right to manufacture, sell and distribute soft drink products of
companies other than PepsiCo, including DR PEPPER and SQUIRT. We also have the
right in some of our territories to manufacture, sell and distribute beverages
under trademarks that we own, including ELECTROPURA, EPURA and GARCI CRESPO.
We have the exclusive right to manufacture, sell and distribute Pepsi-Cola
beverages in all or a portion of 41 states and the District of Columbia in the
U.S., nine Canadian provinces, Spain, Greece, Russia, Turkey and all or a
portion of 23 states in Mexico. In 2004, approximately 72% of our net revenues
were generated in the United States, 10% of our net revenues were generated in
Mexico and the remaining 18% of our net revenues were generated in Canada,
Spain, Greece, Russia and Turkey. In 2004, worldwide sales of our products to
two of our customers accounted for approximately 10% of our net revenues. We
have an extensive direct store distribution system in the United States, Mexico
and Canada. In Russia, Spain, Greece and Turkey, we use a combination of direct
store distribution and distribution through wholesalers, depending on local
marketplace considerations.
1
RAW MATERIALS AND OTHER SUPPLIES
We purchase the concentrates to manufacture Pepsi-Cola beverages and other
beverage products from PepsiCo and other beverage companies.
In addition to concentrates, we purchase sweeteners, glass and plastic
bottles, cans, closures, syrup containers, other packaging materials, carbon
dioxide and some finished goods. We generally purchase our raw materials, other
than concentrates, from multiple suppliers. PepsiCo acts as our agent for the
purchase of such raw materials in the United States and Canada and, with respect
to some of our raw materials, in certain of our international markets. The Pepsi
beverage agreements, as described below, provide that, with respect to the
beverage products of PepsiCo, all authorized containers, closures, cases,
cartons and other packages and labels may be purchased only from manufacturers
approved by PepsiCo. There are no materials or supplies used by PBG that are
currently in short supply. The supply or cost of specific materials could be
adversely affected by various factors, including price changes, strikes, weather
conditions and governmental controls.
PATENTS, TRADEMARKS AND LICENSES
Our portfolio of beverage products includes some of the best recognized
trademarks in the world and includes PEPSI-COLA, DIET PEPSI, MOUNTAIN DEW,
AQUAFINA, SIERRA MIST, DIET MOUNTAIN DEW, LIPTON BRISK, SOBE, STARBUCKS
FRAPPUCCINO and TROPICANA JUICE DRINKS and, outside the U.S., PEPSI-COLA, 7 UP,
KAS, MIRINDA and AQUA MINERALE. In some of our territories, we have the right to
manufacture, sell and distribute beverage products of companies other than
PepsiCo, including DR PEPPER and SQUIRT. We also have the right in some of our
territories to manufacture, sell and distribute beverages under trademarks that
we own, including ELECTROPURA, EPURA and GARCI CRESPO. The majority of our
volume is derived from brands licensed from PepsiCo or PepsiCo joint ventures.
We conduct our business primarily pursuant to PBG's beverage agreements
with PepsiCo. Although Bottling LLC is not a direct party to these agreements,
as the principal operating subsidiary of PBG, Bottling LLC enjoys certain rights
and is subject to certain obligations as described below. These agreements give
us the exclusive right to market, distribute, and produce beverage products of
PepsiCo in authorized containers in specified territories.
Set forth below is a description of the Pepsi beverage agreements and
other bottling agreements from which we benefit and under which we are obligated
as the principal operating subsidiary of PBG.
Terms of the Master Bottling Agreement. The Master Bottling Agreement
under which we manufacture, package, sell and distribute the cola beverages
bearing the PEPSI-COLA and PEPSI trademarks in the U.S. was entered into in
March of 1999. The Master Bottling Agreement gives us the exclusive and
perpetual right to distribute cola beverages for sale in specified territories
in authorized containers of the nature currently used by us. The Master Bottling
Agreement provides that we will purchase our entire requirements of concentrates
for the cola beverages from PepsiCo at prices, and on terms and conditions,
determined from time to time by PepsiCo. PepsiCo may determine from time to time
what types of containers to authorize for use by us. PepsiCo has no rights under
the Master Bottling Agreement with respect to the prices at which we sell our
products.
Under the Master Bottling Agreement we are obligated to:
(1) maintain such plant and equipment, staff, and distribution and
vending facilities that are capable of manufacturing, packaging and
distributing the cola beverages in sufficient quantities to fully
meet the demand for these beverages in our territories;
(2) undertake adequate quality control measures prescribed by PepsiCo;
(3) push vigorously the sale of the cola beverages in our territories;
2
(4) increase and fully meet the demand for the cola beverages in our
territories;
(5) use all approved means and spend such funds on advertising and other
forms of marketing beverages as may be reasonably required to push
vigorously the sale of cola beverages in our territories; and
(6) maintain such financial capacity as may be reasonably necessary to
assure performance under the Master Bottling Agreement by us.
The Master Bottling Agreement requires us to meet annually with PepsiCo to
discuss plans for the ensuing year and the following two years. At such
meetings, we are obligated to present plans that set out in reasonable detail
our marketing plan, our management plan and advertising plan with respect to the
cola beverages for the year. We must also present a financial plan showing that
we have the financial capacity to perform our duties and obligations under the
Master Bottling Agreement for that year, as well as sales, marketing,
advertising and capital expenditure plans for the two years following such year.
PepsiCo has the right to approve such plans, which approval shall not be
unreasonably withheld. In 2004, PepsiCo approved our plans.
If we carry out our annual plan in all material respects, we will be
deemed to have satisfied our obligations to push vigorously the sale of the cola
beverages, increase and fully meet the demand for the cola beverages in our
territories and maintain the financial capacity required under the Master
Bottling Agreement. Failure to present a plan or carry out approved plans in all
material respects would constitute an event of default that, if not cured within
120 days of notice of the failure, would give PepsiCo the right to terminate the
Master Bottling Agreement.
If we present a plan that PepsiCo does not approve, such failure shall
constitute a primary consideration for determining whether we have satisfied our
obligations to maintain our financial capacity, push vigorously the sale of the
cola beverages and increase and fully meet the demand for the cola beverages in
our territories.
If we fail to carry out our annual plan in all material respects in any
segment of our territory, whether defined geographically or by type of market or
outlet, and if such failure is not cured within six months of notice of the
failure, PepsiCo may reduce the territory covered by the Master Bottling
Agreement by eliminating the territory, market or outlet with respect to which
such failure has occurred.
PepsiCo has no obligation to participate with us in advertising and
marketing spending, but it may contribute to such expenditures and undertake
independent advertising and marketing activities, as well as cooperative
advertising and sales promotion programs that would require our cooperation and
support. Although PepsiCo has advised us that it intends to continue to provide
cooperative advertising funds, it is not obligated to do so under the Master
Bottling Agreement.
The Master Bottling Agreement provides that PepsiCo may in its sole
discretion reformulate any of the cola beverages or discontinue them, with some
limitations, so long as all cola beverages are not discontinued. PepsiCo may
also introduce new beverages under the PEPSI-COLA trademarks or any modification
thereof. When that occurs, we are obligated to manufacture, package, distribute
and sell such new beverages with the same obligations as then exist with respect
to other cola beverages. We are prohibited from producing or handling cola
products, other than those of PepsiCo, or products or packages that imitate,
infringe or cause confusion with the products, containers or trademarks of
PepsiCo. The Master Bottling Agreement also imposes requirements with respect to
the use of PepsiCo's trademarks, authorized containers, packaging and labeling.
If we acquire control, directly or indirectly, of any bottler of cola
beverages, we must cause the acquired bottler to amend its bottling appointments
for the cola beverages to conform to the terms of the Master Bottling Agreement.
Under the Master Bottling Agreement, PepsiCo has agreed not to withhold
approval for any acquisition of rights to manufacture and sell PEPSI trademarked
cola beverages within a specific
3
area - currently representing approximately 11.2% of PepsiCo's U.S. bottling
system in terms of volume - if we have successfully negotiated the acquisition
and, in PepsiCo's reasonable judgment, satisfactorily performed our obligations
under the Master Bottling Agreement. We have agreed not to acquire or attempt to
acquire any rights to manufacture and sell PEPSI trademarked cola beverages
outside of that specific area without PepsiCo's prior written approval.
The Master Bottling Agreement is perpetual, but may be terminated by
PepsiCo in the event of our default. Events of default include:
(1) PBG's insolvency, bankruptcy, dissolution, receivership or the like;
(2) any disposition of any voting securities of one of our bottling
subsidiaries or substantially all of our bottling assets without the
consent of PepsiCo;
(3) PBG's entry into any business other than the business of
manufacturing, selling or distributing non-alcoholic beverages or
any business which is directly related and incidental to such
beverage business; and
(4) any material breach under the contract that remains uncured for 120
days after notice by PepsiCo.
An event of default will also occur if any person or affiliated group
acquires any contract, option, conversion privilege, or other right to acquire,
directly or indirectly, beneficial ownership of more than 15% of any class or
series of PBG's voting securities without the consent of PepsiCo. As of February
11, 2005, to our knowledge, no shareholder of PBG, other than PepsiCo, held more
than 12.5% of PBG's Common Stock.
We are prohibited from assigning, transferring or pledging the Master
Bottling Agreement, or any interest therein, whether voluntarily, or by
operation of law, including by merger or liquidation, without the prior consent
of PepsiCo.
The Master Bottling Agreement was entered into by PBG in the context of
our separation from PepsiCo and, therefore, its provisions were not the result
of arm's-length negotiations. Consequently, the agreement contains provisions
that are less favorable to us than the exclusive bottling appointments for cola
beverages currently in effect for independent bottlers in the United States.
Terms of the Non-Cola Bottling Agreements. The beverage products covered
by the non-cola bottling agreements are beverages licensed to PBG by PepsiCo,
consisting of MOUNTAIN DEW, AQUAFINA, SIERRA MIST, DIET MOUNTAIN DEW, MUG root
beer and cream soda, MOUNTAIN DEW CODE RED and SLICE. The non-cola bottling
agreements contain provisions that are similar to those contained in the Master
Bottling Agreement with respect to pricing, territorial restrictions, authorized
containers, planning, quality control, transfer restrictions, term and related
matters. PBG's non-cola bottling agreements will terminate if PepsiCo terminates
PBG's Master Bottling Agreement. The exclusivity provisions contained in the
non-cola bottling agreements would prevent us from manufacturing, selling or
distributing beverage products which imitate, infringe upon, or cause confusion
with, the beverage products covered by the non-cola bottling agreements. PepsiCo
may also elect to discontinue the manufacture, sale or distribution of a
non-cola beverage and terminate the applicable non-cola bottling agreement upon
six months notice to us.
Terms of Certain Distribution Agreements. PBG also has agreements with
PepsiCo granting us exclusive rights to distribute AMP and DOLE in all of PBG's
territories and SOBE in certain specified territories. The distribution
agreements contain provisions generally similar to those in the Master Bottling
Agreement as to use of trademarks, trade names, approved containers and labels
and causes for termination. PBG also has the right to sell and distribute
GATORADE in Spain, Greece and Russia and in certain limited channels of
distribution in the U.S. Some of these beverage agreements have limited terms
and, in most instances, prohibit us from dealing in similar beverage
4
products. We are also currently distributing TROPICANA JUICE DRINKS in the
United States and Canada and TROPICANA JUICES in Russia.
Terms of the Master Syrup Agreement. The Master Syrup Agreement grants PBG
the exclusive right to manufacture, sell and distribute fountain syrup to local
customers in PBG's territories. The Master Syrup Agreement also grants PBG the
right to act as a manufacturing and delivery agent for national accounts within
PBG territories that specifically request direct delivery without using a
middleman. In addition, PepsiCo may appoint PBG to manufacture and deliver
fountain syrup to national accounts that elect delivery through independent
distributors. Under the Master Syrup Agreement, PBG has the exclusive right to
service fountain equipment for all of the national account customers within
PBG's territories. The Master Syrup Agreement provides that the determination of
whether an account is local or national is at the sole discretion of PepsiCo.
The Master Syrup Agreement contains provisions that are similar to those
contained in the Master Bottling Agreement with respect to concentrate pricing,
territorial restrictions with respect to local customers and national customers
electing direct-to-store delivery only, planning, quality control, transfer
restrictions and related matters. The Master Syrup Agreement had an initial term
of five years which expired in 2004 and was renewed for an additional five-year
period. The Master Syrup Agreement will automatically renew for additional
five-year periods, unless PepsiCo terminates it for cause. PepsiCo has the right
to terminate the Master Syrup Agreement without cause at any time upon
twenty-four months notice. In the event PepsiCo terminates the Master Syrup
Agreement without cause, PepsiCo is required to pay PBG the fair market value of
PBG's rights thereunder.
Our Master Syrup Agreement will terminate if PepsiCo terminates our Master
Bottling Agreement.
Terms of Other U.S. Bottling Agreements. The bottling agreements between
PBG and other licensors of beverage products, including Cadbury Schweppes plc
for DR PEPPER, SCHWEPPES, CANADA DRY, HAWAIIAN PUNCH and SQUIRT, the
Pepsi/Lipton Tea Partnership for LIPTON BRISK and LIPTON'S ICED TEA, and the
North American Coffee Partnership for STARBUCKS FRAPPUCCINO, contain provisions
generally similar to those in the Master Bottling Agreement as to use of
trademarks, trade names, approved containers and labels, sales of imitations and
causes for termination. Some of these beverage agreements have limited terms
and, in most instances, prohibit us from dealing in similar beverage products.
Terms of the Country Specific Bottling Agreements. The country specific
bottling agreements contain provisions generally similar to those contained in
the Master Bottling Agreement and the non-cola bottling agreements and, in
Canada, the Master Syrup Agreement with respect to authorized containers,
planning, quality control, transfer restrictions, term, causes for termination
and related matters. These bottling agreements differ from the Master Bottling
Agreement because, except for Canada, they include both fountain syrup and
non-fountain beverages. Certain of these bottling agreements contain provisions
that have been modified to reflect the laws and regulations of the applicable
country. For example, the bottling agreements in Spain do not contain a
restriction on the sale and shipment of Pepsi-Cola beverages into our territory
by others in response to unsolicited orders. In addition, in Mexico and Turkey
we are restricted in our ability to manufacture, sell and distribute beverages
sold under non-PepsiCo trademarks.
SEASONALITY
Our peak season is the warm summer months beginning in May and ending in
September. Approximately 66% of our operating income is typically earned during
the second and third quarters. Approximately 73% of cash flow from operations is
typically generated in the third and fourth quarters.
5
COMPETITION
The carbonated soft drink market and the non-carbonated beverage market
are highly competitive. Our competitors in these markets include bottlers and
distributors of nationally advertised and marketed products, bottlers and
distributors of regionally advertised and marketed products, as well as bottlers
of private label soft drinks sold in chain stores. Among our major competitors
are bottlers that distribute products from The Coca-Cola Company including
Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc., Coca-Cola Hellenic Bottling Company S.A., Coca-Cola
FEMSA S.A. de C.V. and Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated. Our market share for
carbonated soft drinks sold under trademarks owned by PepsiCo in our U.S.
territories ranges from approximately 22% to approximately 37%. Our market share
for carbonated soft drinks sold under trademarks owned by PepsiCo for each
country, outside the U.S., in which we do business is as follows: Canada 37%;
Russia 25%; Turkey 18%; Spain 13% and Greece 11% (including market share for our
IVI brand). In addition, market share for our territories and the territories of
other Pepsi bottlers in Mexico is 15% for carbonated soft drinks sold under
trademarks owned by PepsiCo. Actions by our major competitors and others in the
beverage industry, as well as the general economic environment could have an
impact on our future market share.
We compete primarily on the basis of advertising and marketing programs to
create brand awareness, price and promotions, retail space management, customer
service, consumer points of access, new products, packaging innovations and
distribution methods. We believe that brand recognition, market place pricing,
consumer value, availability and consumer and customer goodwill are primary
factors affecting our competitive position.
GOVERNMENTAL REGULATION APPLICABLE TO BOTTLING LLC
Our operations and properties are subject to regulation by various
federal, state and local governmental entities and agencies in the United States
as well as foreign governmental entities and agencies in Canada, Spain, Greece,
Russia, Turkey and Mexico. As a producer of food products, we are subject to
production, packaging, quality, labeling and distribution standards in each of
the countries where we have operations, including, in the United States, those
of the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. The operations of our production and
distribution facilities are subject to laws and regulations relating to the
protection of the environment in the countries in which we do business. In the
United States, we are subject to the laws and regulations of various
governmental entities, including the Department of Labor and the Department of
Transportation, and various federal, state and local occupational, labor and
employment and environmental laws. These laws and regulations include the
Occupational Safety and Health Act, the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Act,
the Fair Labor Standards Act and laws relating to the operation, maintenance of
and financial responsibility for fuel storage tanks.
We believe that our current legal, operational and environmental
compliance programs are adequate and that we are in substantial compliance with
applicable laws and regulations of the countries in which we do business. We do
not anticipate making any material expenditures in connection with environmental
remediation and compliance. However, compliance with, or any violation of,
future laws or regulations could require material expenditures by us or
otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or
results of operations.
Bottle and Can Legislation
In all but a few of our United States and Canadian markets, we offer our
bottle and can beverage products in non-refillable containers. Legislation has
been enacted in certain states and Canadian provinces where we operate that
generally prohibits the sale of certain beverages unless a deposit or levy is
charged for the container. These include Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Iowa,
Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, New York, Oregon, California, British Columbia,
Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Prince
Edward Island and Quebec.
6
Massachusetts and Michigan have statutes that require us to pay all or a
portion of unclaimed container deposits to the state and Hawaii and California
impose a levy on beverage containers to fund a waste recovery system.
In addition to the Canadian deposit legislation described above, Ontario,
Canada currently has a regulation requiring that 30% of all soft drinks sold in
Ontario be bottled in refillable containers. This regulation is currently being
reviewed by the Ontario Ministry of the Environment.
The European Commission issued a packaging and packing waste directive
that was incorporated into the national legislation of most member states. This
has resulted in targets being set for the recovery and recycling of household,
commercial and industrial packaging waste and imposes substantial
responsibilities upon bottlers and retailers for implementation. Similar
legislation has been enacted in Turkey.
Mexico adopted legislation regulating the disposal of solid waste
products. In response to this legislation, PBG Mexico maintains agreements with
local and federal Mexican governmental authorities as well as with civil
associations, which require PBG Mexico, and other participating bottlers, to
provide for collection and recycling of certain minimum amounts of plastic
bottles.
We are not aware of similar material legislation being enacted in any
other areas served by us. We are unable to predict, however, whether such
legislation will be enacted or what impact its enactment would have on our
business, financial condition or results of operations.
Soft Drink Excise Tax Legislation
Specific soft drink excise taxes have been in place in certain states for
several years. The states in which we operate that currently impose such a tax
are West Virginia, Arkansas and Tennessee and, with respect to fountain syrup
only, Washington. In Mexico, there are excise taxes on any sweetened beverage
products produced without sugar, including our diet soft drinks. Effective
January 1, 2005, this excise tax also affects imported beverages that are not
sweetened with sugar.
Value-added taxes on soft drinks vary in our territories located in
Canada, Spain, Greece, Russia, Turkey and Mexico, but are consistent with the
value-added tax rate for other consumer products. In addition, there is a
special consumption tax applicable to cola products in Turkey. In Mexico,
bottled water in containers over 10.1 liters are exempt from value-added tax.
We are not aware of any material soft drink taxes that have been enacted
in any other market served by us. We are unable to predict, however, whether
such legislation will be enacted or what impact its enactment would have on our
business, financial condition or results of operations.
Trade Regulation
As a manufacturer, seller and distributor of bottled and canned soft drink
products of PepsiCo and other soft drink manufacturers in exclusive territories
in the United States and internationally, we are subject to antitrust and
competition laws. Under the Soft Drink Interbrand Competition Act, soft drink
bottlers operating in the United States, such as us, may have an exclusive right
to manufacture, distribute and sell a soft drink product in a geographic
territory if the soft drink product is in substantial and effective competition
with other products of the same class in the same market or markets. We believe
that there is such substantial and effective competition in each of the
exclusive geographic territories in which we operate.
California Carcinogen and Reproductive Toxin Legislation
A California law requires that any person who exposes another to a
carcinogen or a reproductive toxin must provide a warning to that effect.
Because the law does not define quantitative thresholds below which a warning is
not required, virtually all manufacturers of food products are confronted with
the possibility of having to provide warnings due to the presence of trace
amounts of defined substances. Regulations implementing the law exempt
manufacturers
7
from providing the required warning if it can be demonstrated that the defined
substances occur naturally in the product or are present in municipal water used
to manufacture the product. We have assessed the impact of the law and its
implementing regulations on our beverage products and have concluded that none
of our products currently require a warning under the law. We cannot predict
whether or to what extent food industry efforts to minimize the law's impact on
food products will succeed. We also cannot predict what impact, either in terms
of direct costs or diminished sales, imposition of the law may have.
Mexican Water Regulation
In Mexico, we pump water from our own wells and we purchase water directly
from municipal water companies pursuant to concessions obtained from the Mexican
government on a plant-by-plant basis. The concessions are generally for 10-year
terms and can generally be renewed by us prior to expiration with minimal cost
and effort. Our concessions may be terminated if, among other things, (a) we use
materially more water than permitted by the concession, (b) we use materially
less water than required by the concession, (c) we fail to pay for the rights
for water usage or (d) we carry out, without government authorization, any
material construction on or improvement to, our wells. Our concessions generally
satisfy our current water requirements and we believe that we are generally in
compliance in all material respects with the terms of our existing concessions.
EMPLOYEES
As of December 25, 2004, we employed approximately 64,700 workers, of whom
approximately 31,700 were employed in the United States. Approximately 8,900 of
our workers in the United States are union members and approximately 16,900 of
our workers outside the United States are union members. We consider relations
with our employees to be good and have not experienced significant interruptions
of operations due to labor disagreements.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION ON INDUSTRY SEGMENTS AND GEOGRAPHIC AREAS
See Note 14 to Bottling LLC's Consolidated Financial Statements included
in Item 7 below.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
As of December 25, 2004, we operated 96 soft drink production facilities
worldwide, of which 86 were owned and 8 were leased. In addition, one facility
used for the manufacture of soft drink packaging materials was operated by a PBG
joint venture in Turkey and one facility used for can manufacturing was operated
by a PBG joint venture in Ayer, Massachusetts. Of our 521 distribution
facilities, 335 are owned and 186 are leased. We believe that our bottling,
canning and syrup filling lines and our distribution facilities are sufficient
to meet present needs. We also lease headquarters office space in Somers, New
York.
We also own or lease and operate approximately 40,000 vehicles, including
delivery trucks, delivery and transport tractors and trailers and other trucks
and vans used in the sale and distribution of our soft drink products. We also
own more than 2 million coolers, soft drink dispensing fountains and vending
machines.
With a few exceptions, leases of plants in the United States and Canada
are on a long-term basis, expiring at various times, with options to renew for
additional periods. Most international plants are leased for varying and usually
shorter periods, with or without renewal options. We believe that our properties
are in good operating condition and are adequate to serve our current
operational needs.
8
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time we are a party to various litigation proceedings arising
in the ordinary course of our business, none of which, in the opinion of
management, is likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition or results of operations.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SHAREHOLDERS
None.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Executive officers are elected by our Board of Directors, and their terms
of office continue until the next annual meeting of the Board or until their
successors are elected and have been qualified. There are no family
relationships among our executive officers.
Set forth below is information pertaining to our executive officers who
held office as of February 11, 2005:
JOHN T. CAHILL, 47, is the Principal Executive Officer of Bottling LLC. He has
also been PBG's Chairman of the Board since January 2003 and Chief Executive
Officer since September 2001. Previously, Mr. Cahill served as PBG's President
and Chief Operating Officer from August 2000 to September 2001. Mr. Cahill has
been a member of PBG's Board of Directors since January 1999 and served as PBG's
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer prior to becoming President
and Chief Operating Officer in August 2000. He was Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of the Pepsi-Cola Company from April 1998 until November
1998. Prior to that, Mr. Cahill was Senior Vice President and Treasurer of
PepsiCo, having been appointed to that position in April 1997. In 1996, he
became Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Pepsi-Cola North
America. Mr. Cahill joined PepsiCo in 1989 where he held several other senior
financial positions through 1996.
ALFRED H. DREWES, 49, is the Principal Financial Officer of Bottling LLC. He is
also PBG's Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Appointed to this
position in June 2001, Mr. Drewes previously served as Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of Pepsi Beverages International ("PBI"). Mr. Drewes
joined PepsiCo in 1982 as a financial analyst. During the next nine years, he
rose through increasingly responsible finance positions within Pepsi-Cola North
America in field operations and headquarters. In 1991, Mr. Drewes joined PBI as
Vice President of Manufacturing Operations, with responsibility for the global
concentrate supply organization.
ANDREA L. FORSTER, 45, is the Principal Accounting Officer of Bottling LLC. She
is also Vice President and Controller of PBG. In September 2000, Ms. Forster was
also named Corporate Compliance Officer for PBG. Following several years with
Deloitte Haskins and Sells, Ms. Forster joined PepsiCo in 1987 as a Senior
Analyst in External Reporting. She progressed through a number of positions in
the accounting and reporting functions and, in 1998, was appointed Assistant
Controller of the Pepsi-Cola Company. She was named Assistant Controller of PBG
in 1999.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS AND
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
There is no established public trading market for the ownership of
Bottling LLC.
9
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA
in millions
FISCAL YEARS ENDED 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000(1)
- ------------------------------------------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA:
Net revenues ....................................... $ 10,906 $ 10,265 $ 9,216 $ 8,443 $ 7,982
Cost of sales ...................................... 5,656 5,215 5,001 4,580 4,405
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Gross profit ....................................... 5,250 5,050 4,215 3,863 3,577
Selling, delivery and administrative expenses ...... 4,285 4,089 3,318 3,185 2,986
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Operating income ................................... 965 961 897 678 591
Interest expense, net .............................. 132 143 98 78 89
Other non-operating expenses, net .................. 1 7 7 -- 1
Minority interest .................................. -- -- 9 14 8
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Income before income taxes ......................... 832 811 783 586 493
Income tax expense (2)(3)(4) ....................... 3 84 49 (1) 22
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Income before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle .......................... 829 727 734 587 471
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle,
net of tax ...................................... -- 6 -- -- --
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net income ......................................... $ 829 $ 721 $ 734 $ 587 $ 471
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
BALANCE SHEET DATA (AT PERIOD END):
Total assets ....................................... $ 12,580 $ 12,886 $ 10,916 $ 8,677 $ 8,228
Long-term debt ..................................... $ 3,495 3,497 3,541 2,299 2,286
Minority interest .................................. $ 3 -- -- 154 147
Accumulated other comprehensive loss ............... $ (447) (503) (596) (416) (253)
Owners' equity ..................................... $ 6,620 $ 5,902 $ 5,186 $ 4,596 $ 4,321
(1) Our fiscal year 2000 results were impacted by the inclusion of an
extra week in our fiscal year. The extra week increased net
income by $12 million.
(2) Fiscal year 2001 includes Canada tax law change benefits of $25
million.
(3) Fiscal year 2003 includes Canada tax law change expense of $11
million.
(4) Fiscal year 2004 includes Mexico tax law change benefit of $26
million.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL REVIEW
TABULAR DOLLARS IN MILLIONS
OVERVIEW
Bottling Group, LLC (collectively referred to as "Bottling LLC," "we,"
"our" and "us") is the principal operating subsidiary of The Pepsi Bottling
Group ("PBG") and consists of substantially all of the operations and assets of
PBG.
We have the exclusive right to manufacture, sell and distribute Pepsi-Cola
beverages in all or a portion of the U.S., Mexico, Canada and Europe, which
consists of operations in Spain, Greece, Russia and Turkey. As shown in the
graph below, the U.S. business is the dominant driver of our results, generating
61% of our volume, 72% of our revenues and 82% of our operating income.
Operating
Volume Revenues Income
-------- -------- --------
United States ...... 61% 72% 82%
Canada ............. 7% 7% 7%
Mexico ............. 18% 10% 5%
Europe ............. 14% 11% 6%
-------- -------- --------
Total .............. 100% 100% 100%
-------- -------- --------
The brands we sell are some of the best recognized trademarks in the world
and include PEPSI-COLA, DIET PEPSI, MOUNTAIN DEW, AQUAFINA, SIERRA MIST, DIET
MOUNTAIN DEW, LIPTON BRISK, SOBE, STARBUCKS FRAPPUCCINO and TROPICANA JUICE
DRINKS, and outside the U.S., PEPSI-COLA, 7 UP, KAS, MIRINDA, AND AQUA MINERALE.
In some of our territories, we also have the right to manufacture, sell and
distribute soft drink products of companies other than PepsiCo, Inc.
("PepsiCo"), including DR PEPPER and SQUIRT and trademarks we own including
ELECTROPURA, EPURA and GARCI CRESPO.
Our products are sold in either a cold-drink or take-home format. Our
cold-drink format consists of cold products sold in the retail and foodservice
channels, which carry the highest profit margins on a per-case basis. Our
take-home format consists of unchilled products that are sold for at-home future
consumption.
Physical cases represent the number of units that are actually produced,
distributed and sold. Each case of product as sold to our customers, regardless
of package configuration, represents one physical case. Our net price and gross
margin on a per-case basis is impacted by how much we charge for the product,
the mix of brands and packages we sell, and the channels in which the product is
sold. For example, we realize a higher net revenue and gross margin per case on
a 20-ounce chilled bottle sold in a convenience store than on a two-liter
unchilled bottle sold in a grocery store.
Our financial success is dependent on a number of factors, including: our
strong partnership with PepsiCo, the customer relationships we cultivate,
pricing we achieve in the marketplace, our market execution and the efficiency
we achieve in manufacturing and distributing our products. Key indicators of our
financial success are measured by the number of physical cases we sell, the net
price and gross margin we achieve on a per-case basis, and our overall cost
productivity, reflecting how well we manage our raw material, manufacturing,
distribution and other overhead costs.
10
The following discussion and analysis covers the key drivers behind our
business performance in 2004 and is categorized into the following sections:
- Financial performance summary;
- Critical accounting policies;
- Related party transactions;
- Items that affect historical or future comparability;
- Results of operations;
- Liquidity and financial condition; and
- Market risks and cautionary statements.
The discussion and analysis throughout Management's Financial Review
should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the
related accompanying notes. The preparation of our Consolidated Financial
Statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America ("U.S. GAAP") requires us to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts in our Consolidated Financial
Statements and the related accompanying notes, including various claims and
contingencies related to lawsuits, taxes, environmental and other matters
arising out of the normal course of business. We use our best judgment, based on
the advice of external experts and our knowledge of existing facts and
circumstances and actions that we may undertake in the future, in determining
the estimates that affect our Consolidated Financial Statements.
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE SUMMARY
52 WEEKS ENDED
-------------------------------
DECEMBER DECEMBER %
25, 2004 27, 2003 CHANGE
-------- -------- ------
NET REVENUES .......................................... $ 10,906 $ 10,265 6%
GROSS PROFIT .......................................... $ 5,250 $ 5,050 4%
OPERATING INCOME ...................................... $ 965 $ 961 0%
INCOME BEFORE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING
PRINCIPLE(1) .......................................... $ 829 $ 727 14%
NET INCOME ............................................ $ 829 $ 721 15%
(1) - Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle for the fifty-two
weeks ended December 27, 2003, reflects the impact of adoption of EITF Issue No.
02-16. See Note 2 -- Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.
During 2004, we delivered solid results, reflecting strong topline growth,
which was partially offset by higher raw material costs and selling, delivery
and administrative expenses. Overall, our worldwide operating income was flat
versus the prior year, driven by a two percent increase in the U.S. and
double-digit increases in Canada and Europe, partially offset by an operating
income decline in Mexico of 40%. These results include a $9 million non-cash
impairment charge recorded in the fourth quarter related to our re-evaluation of
the fair value of our franchise licensing agreement with Cadbury Bebidas, S.A.
de C.V. for the SQUIRT trademark in Mexico, as a result of a change in its
estimated accounting life.
Our strong topline growth was driven by innovation and solid execution in
the marketplace. This growth has been balanced, reflecting three percent growth
in net revenue per case and two percent growth in volume, with the remaining
percentage of growth coming from foreign currency translation. In the U.S., we
achieved a two percent volume increase due primarily to the successful
introduction of TROPICANA JUICE DRINKS and growth in AQUAFINA
11
and our diet portfolio. In Europe, we delivered strong results, growing net
revenues by 19 percent versus the prior year, driven by double-digit volume
growth in Russia and Turkey. In Canada, TROPICANA TWISTER was introduced in
2004, and was a key player in the growth of non-carbonated drinks in that
geography. Our product portfolio and packaging has been well positioned to
capture the opportunity presented by changing consumer preferences geared toward
health and wellness, variety and convenience.
Our strong topline growth was partially offset by increases in cost of
sales, which have continued to pressure our bottom line results. On a per-case
basis, cost of sales increased five percent reflecting significant increases in
raw material costs coupled with mix shifts into more expensive products and
packages. During 2004, we have experienced increases in concentrate prices,
coupled with growth in aluminum, sweeteners and resin prices, which added more
than $80 million of costs or one and a half percentage points of growth to our
worldwide cost of sales per case. Additionally, the negative impact of foreign
currency translation contributed one percentage point of growth to our cost of
sales increase.
Selling, delivery and administrative expenses increased five percent,
which includes one percentage point of growth from foreign currency. The
remaining four percentage points of growth were due primarily to higher labor
and benefit costs. These increases were partially offset by cost savings driven
from a number of worldwide productivity initiatives we put in place during 2004
and a reduction in our bad debt expense.
In Mexico, we faced a number of challenges throughout the year including
competitive pressures, increased commodity costs and the devaluation of the
Mexican peso. Low-priced bargain brands continue to be an important factor in
the marketplace, which has made it difficult for us and all soft drink suppliers
to increase pricing. Cost of sales in Mexico has also been impacted by rising
sweetener costs throughout the year and a steep rise in resin costs in the
fourth quarter. We have made a number of investments in the marketplace and in
our infrastructure in Mexico, which should provide long-term benefits,
particularly in our water business and in our operating efficiency. Trends are
improving in Mexico, with volume increasing by four percent in the second half
of the year, bringing our volume to flat for the full year. Innovation and
execution in the marketplace played a key role in our volume improvement during
the year. During 2004, we introduced a number of new products and packages,
added 13,000 new accounts to our customer base and placed 24,000 net new
coolers.
From a cash flow perspective, we continued our strong track record of
growing our cash from operations. We generated $1.4 billion of cash from
operations, after contributing $83 million into PBG's pension plans, which are
solidly funded. With our strong cash flows, we utilized $717 million for capital
investments to grow our business.
OUTLOOK
In 2005, our fiscal year will include a 53rd week, while fiscal year 2004
consisted of 52 weeks. Our U.S. and Canadian operations report on a fiscal year
that consists of 52 weeks, ending on the last Saturday in December. Every five
or six years a 53rd week is added. Our other countries report on a calendar-year
basis. In order to provide comparable guidance for 2005, we have excluded the
impact of the 53rd week from our outlook. The table and the 2005 outlook
discussion below provide pro forma disclosure by excluding the projected impact
of the 53rd week in 2005:
PRO FORMA FORECASTED IMPACT OF 53rd FORECASTED 2005 VERSUS
2005 VERSUS 2004 GROWTH WEEK 2004 GROWTH
----------------------- -------------- ----------------------
Worldwide Volume 2% to 3% 1% 3% to 4%
U.S. and Canada Volume Flat to 1% 1% 1% to 2%
Worldwide SD&A (in dollars) 2% to 3% 1% 3% to 4%
Worldwide Operating Profit (in dollars) Flat to 3% 1% 1% to 4%
In 2005, we expect our worldwide pro forma volume to grow between two and
three percent, with the U.S. and Canada each expected to be flat to up one
percent, Mexico up three to four percent and Europe up mid to high-single
digits. We will carefully balance our net revenue per case, using rate
increases where marketplace conditions allow, while also managing the mix of
products we plan to sell. We expect to increase our worldwide net revenue per
case one to two percent, which reflects a three percent increase in the U.S.,
partially offset by larger contributions from our international territories
that typically have lower net revenue per case than the U.S., coupled with an
expected mid-single digit decline in the value of the Mexican peso.
12
In 2005, worldwide cost of sales per case is expected to increase by four to
five percent. We are expecting the prices of resin, sweetener and aluminum to
continue to increase, driving higher costs in excess of $100 million during 2005
versus the prior year. As a result, we expect our gross margin per case growth
to be flat. Our pro forma selling, delivery and administrative expenses are
expected to rise two to three percent, reflecting increases in labor and
benefits, partially offset by productivity initiatives in the U.S. and Mexico.
Due to the increasing costs of our business, we expect pro forma operating
income growth to be flat to up three percent.
Our 2005 outlook does not reflect the effect of the implementation of the
final accounting standard on the expensing of share-based payments, which will
have a material impact on our results. We are in the process of evaluating the
impact of the standard. See Note 2 in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
for more information. Additionally, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 was
enacted allowing for special tax breaks for the repatriation of earnings from
foreign subsidiaries. We are evaluating whether to repatriate our undistributed
foreign earnings in 2005.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS - A portion of our accounts receivable
will not be collected due to customer disputes, bankruptcies and sales returns.
Estimating an allowance for doubtful accounts requires significant management
judgment and is dependent upon the overall economic environment and our
customers' viability. We provide reserves for these situations based on the
evaluation of the aging of our trade receivable portfolio and an in-depth
analysis of our high-risk customers. Our reserves contemplate our historical
loss rate on receivables, specific customer situations and the economic
environments in which we operate. We have effective credit controls in place to
manage these exposures and believe that our allowance for doubtful accounts
adequately provides for these risks.
Our allowance for doubtful accounts was $61 million, $72 million and $67
million as of December 25, 2004, December 27, 2003 and December 28, 2002,
respectively. Our allowance for doubtful accounts represents management's best
estimate of probable losses inherent in our portfolio. The following is an
analysis of the allowance for doubtful accounts for the fiscal years ended
December 25, 2004, December 27, 2003 and December 28, 2002:
ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL
----------------------
ACCOUNTS
--------
2004 2003 2002
------ ------ ------
Beginning of the year............. $ 72 $ 67 $ 42
Bad debt expense.................. (5) 12 32
Additions from acquisitions....... - - 14
Accounts written off.............. (7) (8) (22)
Foreign currency translation...... 1 1 1
------ ------ ------
End of the year................... $ 61 $ 72 $ 67
====== ====== ======
RECOVERABILITY OF GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS WITH INDEFINITE LIVES -
Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized,
but instead tested annually for impairment.
Our identified intangible assets principally arise from the allocation of
the purchase price of businesses acquired, and consist primarily of franchise
rights, distribution rights and brands. We assign amounts to such identified
intangibles based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. The
determination of the expected life will be dependent upon the use and underlying
characteristics of the identified intangible asset. In determining whether our
intangible assets have an indefinite useful life, we consider the following as
applicable: the nature and terms of underlying agreements; our intent and
ability to use the specific asset contained in an agreement; the age and market
position of the products within the territories we are entitled to sell; the
historical and projected growth of those products; and costs, if any, to renew
the agreement.
We evaluate our identified intangible assets with indefinite useful lives
for impairment annually (unless it is required more frequently because of a
triggering event) on an individual basis or by asset groups on a
country-by-country basis, depending on the nature of the intangible asset. We
measure impairment as the amount by which the carrying value exceeds its
estimated fair value.
13
The fair value of our franchise rights and distribution rights is measured
using a multi-period excess earnings method that is based upon estimated
discounted future cash flows, including a terminal value, which assumes the
franchise rights and distribution rights will continue in perpetuity. We deduct
a contributory charge from our net after-tax cash flows for the economic return
attributable to our working capital, other intangible assets and property, plant
and equipment, which represents the required cash flow to support these assets.
The net discounted cash flows in excess of the fair returns on these assets
represent the estimated fair value of our franchise rights and distribution
rights.
The fair value of our brands is measured using a multi-period royalty
saving method, which reflects the savings realized by owning the brand and,
therefore, not having to pay a royalty fee to a third party. In valuing our
brands, we have selected an estimated industry royalty rate relating to each
brand and then applied it to the forecasted revenues associated with each brand.
The net discounted after-tax cash flows from these royalty charges represent the
fair value of our brands.
Our discount rate utilized in each fair value calculation is based upon
our weighted-average cost of capital plus an additional risk premium to reflect
the risk and uncertainty inherent in separately acquiring the identified
intangible asset between a willing buyer and a willing seller. The additional
risk premium associated with our discount rate effectively eliminates the
benefit that we believe results from synergies, scale and our assembled
workforce, all of which are components of goodwill. Each year we re-evaluate our
assumptions in our discounted cash flow model to address changes in our business
and marketplace conditions.
We evaluate goodwill on a country-by-country basis ("reporting unit") for
impairment. We evaluate each reporting unit for impairment based upon a two-step
approach. First, we compare the fair value of our reporting unit with its
carrying value. Second, if the carrying value of our reporting unit exceeds its
fair value, we compare the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill
to its carrying amount to measure the amount of impairment loss. In measuring
the implied fair value of goodwill, we would allocate the fair value of the
reporting unit to each of its assets and liabilities (including any unrecognized
intangible assets). Any excess of the fair value of the reporting unit over the
amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of
goodwill.
We measure the fair value of a reporting unit as the discounted estimated
future cash flows, including a terminal value, which assumes the business
continues in perpetuity, less its net debt (net of cash and cash equivalents).
Our long-term terminal growth assumptions reflect our current long-term view of
the marketplace. Our discount rate is based upon our weighted-average cost of
capital for each reporting unit. Each year we re-evaluate our assumptions in our
discounted cash flow model to address changes in our business and marketplace
conditions.
Considerable management judgment is necessary to estimate discounted
future cash flows in conducting an impairment test for goodwill and other
identified intangible assets, which may be impacted by future actions taken by
us and our competitors and the volatility in the markets in which we conduct
business. A change in assumptions in our cash flows could have a significant
impact on the fair value of our reporting units and other identified intangible
assets, which could then result in a material impairment charge to our results
of operations.
PENSION AND POSTRETIREMENT MEDICAL BENEFIT PLANS - PBG sponsors pension
and other postretirement medical benefit plans in various forms, covering
employees who meet specified eligibility requirements. We account for PBG's
defined benefit pension plans and our postretirement medical benefit plans using
actuarial models required by SFAS No. 87, "Employers' Accounting for Pensions,"
and SFAS No. 106, "Employers' Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than
Pensions." The amounts necessary to fund future payouts under these plans are
subject to numerous assumptions and variables including anticipated discount
rate, expected rate of return on plan assets, historical health care cost trends
and future compensation levels. We evaluate these assumptions with our actuarial
advisors on an annual basis and we believe that they are appropriate, although
an increase or decrease in the assumptions or economic events outside our
control could have a material impact on reported net income.
The assets, liabilities and assumptions used to measure pension and
postretirement medical expense for any fiscal year are determined as of
September 30 of the preceding year ("measurement date"). The discount rate
assumption used in our pension and postretirement medical benefit plans'
accounting is based on current interest rates for high-quality, long-term
corporate debt as determined on each measurement date. In evaluating the rate of
return on PBG's assets for a given fiscal year, we consider the 10-15 year
historical return of PBG's pension investment portfolio, reflecting the weighted
return of PBG's asset allocation. Over the past three fiscal years, the
composition of PBG's pension assets in the U.S. was approximately 70%-75% equity
investments and 25%-30% fixed income securities, which primarily consist of U.S.
government and corporate bonds. Differences between actual and expected returns
are generally recognized in the net periodic pension calculation over five
years. To the
14
extent the amount of all unrecognized gains and losses exceeds 10% of the larger
of the benefit obligation or plan assets, such amount is amortized over the
average remaining service life of active participants. The rate of future
compensation increases is based upon our historical experience and management's
best estimate regarding future expectations. We amortize prior service costs on
a straight-line basis over the average remaining service period of employees
expected to receive benefits.
We used the following weighted-average assumptions to compute our pension
and postretirement medical expense in the United States:
PENSION 2004 2003 2002
- -------- ---- ---- ----
Discount rate .................................................... 6.25% 6.75% 7.50%
Expected return on plan assets (net of administrative expenses) .. 8.50% 8.50% 9.50%
Rate of compensation increase .................................... 4.20% 4.34% 4.33%
POSTRETIREMENT 2004 2003 2002
- -------------- ----- ----- ----
Discount rate .................. 6.25% 6.75% 7.50%
Rate of compensation increase .. 4.20% 4.34% 4.33%
Health care cost trend rate .... 11.00% 12.00% 8.00%
During 2004, our defined benefit pension and postretirement medical
expenses in the U.S. totaled $88 million. In 2005, these expenses will increase
by $12 million to $100 million due primarily to the following factors:
- A decrease in our weighted-average discount rate for our pension and
postretirement medical expense from 6.25% to 6.15%, reflecting
declines in the yields of long-term corporate bonds. This assumption
change will increase our 2005 defined benefit pension and
postretirement medical expense by approximately $3 million.
- Changes in demographics assumptions, including mortality, and other
plan changes will increase our 2005 defined benefit pension and
postretirement medical expense by approximately $5 million.
- Merging our long-term disability medical plan with our
postretirement medical plan. In 2004, we amended our long-term
disability medical plan to provide coverage for two years for
participants becoming disabled after January 1, 2005. Participants
currently receiving benefits will be grandfathered under the
existing benefits program. The costs of $4 million associated with
these participants will be reclassified from our long-term
disability medical plan to our postretirement medical plan beginning
in 2005.
INCOME TAXES - We are a limited liability company, taxable as a
partnership for U.S. tax purposes and, as such, generally will pay no U.S.
federal or state income taxes. Our federal and state distributable shares of
income, deductions and credits will be allocated to our owners based on their
percentage of ownership. However, certain domestic and foreign affiliates pay
taxes in their respective jurisdictions and record related deferred income tax
assets and liabilities. The tax bases of our assets and liabilities reflect our
best estimate of the tax benefit and costs we expect to realize. We establish
valuation allowances to reduce our deferred tax assets to an amount that will
more likely than not be realized. A significant portion of deferred tax assets
consists of net operating loss carryforwards. We have net operating loss
carryforwards totaling $1,177 million at December 25, 2004, which are available
to reduce future taxes in the U.S., Spain, Greece, Russia, Turkey and Mexico.
The majority of our net operating loss carryforwards is generated overseas, the
largest of which is coming from our Mexican and Spanish operations due to the
financing put in place when we purchased the business of Pepsi-Gemex, S.A. de
C.V. Of these carryforwards, $9 million expire in 2005 and $1,168 million expire
at various times between 2006 and 2024.
Significant management judgment is required in determining our effective
tax rate and in evaluating our tax position. We establish reserves when, despite
our belief that our tax return positions are supportable, we believe these
positions may be challenged. We adjust these reserves as warranted by changing
facts and circumstances. A change in our tax reserves could have a significant
impact on our results of operations.
A number of years may elapse before a particular matter for which we have
established a reserve is audited and finally resolved. The number of years for
which we have audits that are open varies depending on the tax jurisdiction. The
U.S. Internal Revenue Service is currently examining our and PepsiCo's joint tax
returns for 1998 through March 1999 and our tax returns for the balance of 1999
and 2000. While it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing
of the resolution, we believe that our reserves reflect the probable outcome of
known tax
15
contingencies. Favorable resolutions would be recognized as a reduction of our
tax expense in the year of resolution. Unfavorable resolutions would be
recognized as a reduction to our reserves, a cash outlay for settlement and a
possible increase to our annual tax provision.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
PepsiCo is considered a related party due to the nature of our franchise
relationship and its ownership interest in our company. Over 80% of our volume
is derived from the sale of brands from PepsiCo. At December 25, 2004, PepsiCo
owned 6.8% of our equity.
Our business is conducted primarily under beverage agreements between PBG
and PepsiCo, including a master bottling agreement, non-cola bottling agreement
and a master syrup agreement. Additionally, under a shared services agreement,
we obtain various services from PepsiCo, which include services for information
technology maintenance and the procurement of raw materials. We also provide
services to PepsiCo, including facility and credit and collection support.
Although we are not a direct party to these contracts, as the principal
operating subsidiary of PBG, we derive direct benefit from them.
We review our annual marketing, advertising, management and financial
plans each year with PepsiCo for its approval. If we fail to submit these plans,
or if we fail to carry them out in all material respects, PepsiCo can terminate
our beverage agreements. Because we depend on PepsiCo to provide us with
concentrate, bottler incentives and various services, changes in our
relationship with PepsiCo could have a material adverse effect on our business
and financial results.
BOTTLER INCENTIVES AND OTHER ARRANGEMENTS - In order to promote PepsiCo
beverages, PepsiCo, at its discretion, provides us with various forms of bottler
incentives. These incentives are mutually agreed upon between PepsiCo and us and
cover a variety of initiatives, including direct marketplace support, capital
equipment funding and advertising support. Based on the objectives of the
programs and initiatives, we record bottler incentives as an adjustment to net
revenues, cost of sales or selling, delivery and administrative expenses.
Beginning in 2003, due to the adoption of Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF")
Issue No. 02-16, "Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for Certain
Consideration Received from a Vendor," we have changed our accounting
methodology for the way we record certain bottler incentives. See Note 2 in
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion on the change in
classification of these bottler incentives in our Consolidated Statements of
Operations. Bottler incentives received from PepsiCo, including media costs
shared by PepsiCo, were $626 million, $646 million and $560 million for 2004,
2003 and 2002, respectively. Changes in our bottler incentives and funding
levels could materially affect our business and financial results.
PURCHASE OF CONCENTRATE AND FINISHED PRODUCT - As part of our franchise
relationship, we purchase concentrate from PepsiCo, pay royalties and produce or
distribute other products through various arrangements with PepsiCo or PepsiCo
joint ventures. The prices we pay for concentrate, finished goods and royalties
are determined by PepsiCo at its sole discretion. Significant changes in the
amount we pay PepsiCo for concentrate, finished goods and royalties could
materially affect our business and financial results. Total net amounts paid or
payable to PepsiCo or PepsiCo joint ventures for these arrangements were $2,741
million, $2,527 million and $2,163 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
These amounts are reflected in cost of sales in our Consolidated Statements of
Operations.
MANUFACTURING AND DISTRIBUTION SERVICE REIMBURSEMENTS - In 2003 and 2002,
we provided manufacturing services to PepsiCo and PepsiCo affiliates in
connection with the production of certain finished beverage products. During
2003 and 2002, total amounts paid or payable by PepsiCo for these transactions
were $6 million and $10 million, respectively.
FOUNTAIN SERVICE FEE - We manufacture and distribute fountain products and
provide fountain equipment service to PepsiCo customers in some territories in
accordance with the Pepsi beverage agreements. Amounts received from PepsiCo for
these transactions are offset by the cost to provide these services and are
reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Operations in selling, delivery and
administrative expenses. Net amounts paid or payable by PepsiCo to us for these
services were approximately $180 million, $200 million and $200 million, in
2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
SHARED SERVICES - We provide and receive various services from PepsiCo and
PepsiCo affiliates pursuant to a shared services agreement and other
arrangements. In the absence of these agreements, we would have to obtain such
services on our own. We might not be able to obtain these services on terms,
including cost, which are as favorable as those we receive from PepsiCo. Total
expenses incurred with PepsiCo and PepsiCo affiliates were
16
approximately $68 million, $72 million and, $70 million during 2004, 2003 and
2002, respectively, and are reflected in selling, delivery and administrative
expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. Total income generated
for services provided to PepsiCo and PepsiCo affiliates was approximately $10
million, $10 million and, $13 million during 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively,
and is reflected in selling, delivery and administrative expenses in our
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
FRITO-LAY PURCHASES - We purchase snack food products from Frito-Lay,
Inc., a subsidiary of PepsiCo, for sale and distribution in Russia. Amounts paid
or payable to PepsiCo and its affiliates for snack food products were $75
million, $51 million and $44 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and
are reflected in selling, delivery and administrative expenses in our
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
INCOME TAX EXPENSE - Under tax sharing arrangements we have with PepsiCo,
we recorded $10 million, $7 million and $3 million in tax-related benefits from
PepsiCo in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
The Consolidated Statements of Operations include the following income
(expense) amounts as a result of transactions with PepsiCo and its affiliates:
2004 2003 2002
-------- -------- --------
Net revenues:
Bottler incentives ..................................................... $ 22 $ 21 $ 257
======== ======== ========
Cost of sales:
Purchases of concentrate and finished products,
and AQUAFINA royalty fees ............................................ $ (2,741) $ (2,527) $ (2,163)
Bottler incentives ..................................................... 522 527 --
Manufacturing and distribution service reimbursements .................. -- 6 10
-------- -------- --------
$ (2,219) $ (1,994) $ (2,153)
======== ======== ========
Selling, delivery and administrative expenses:
Bottler incentives ..................................................... $ 82 $ 98 $ 303
Fountain service fee ................................................... 180 200 200
Frito-Lay purchases .................................................... (75) (51) (44)
Shared services ........................................................ (58) (62) (57)
-------- -------- --------
$ 129 $ 185 $ 402
======== ======== ========
Income tax expense $ 10 $ 7 $ 3
======== ======== ========
For further information about our relationship with PepsiCo and its
affiliates see Note 15 in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
ITEMS THAT AFFECT HISTORICAL OR FUTURE COMPARABILITY
Gemex Acquisition
In November 2002, we acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of
Pepsi-Gemex, S.A. de C.V. of Mexico ("Gemex"). Our total acquisition cost
consisted of a net cash payment of $871 million and assumed debt of
approximately $318 million.
The following unaudited pro forma operating information summarizes our
consolidated results of operations as if the Gemex acquisition had occurred on
the first day of fiscal year 2002.
2002
--------
Net revenues................................... $ 10,297
Income before income taxes..................... $ 811
Net income..................................... $ 753
17
EITF Issue No. 02-16
In January 2003, the Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") reached a
consensus on Issue No. 02-16, "Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller)
for Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor," addressing the recognition
and income statement classification of various cash consideration given by a
vendor to a customer. The consensus requires that certain cash consideration
received by a customer from a vendor is presumed to be a reduction of the price
of the vendor's products, and therefore should be characterized as a reduction
of cost of sales when recognized in the customer's income statement, unless
certain criteria are met to overcome this presumption. EITF Issue No. 02-16
became effective beginning in our fiscal year 2003. Prior to 2003, we classified
worldwide bottler incentives received from PepsiCo and other brand owners as
adjustments to net revenues and selling, delivery and administrative expenses,
depending on the objective of the program. In accordance with EITF Issue No.
02-16, we have classified certain bottler incentives as a reduction of cost of
sales beginning in 2003.
See Note 2 in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, for additional
information and pro forma adjustments for bottler incentives that would have
been made to our reported results for the fifty-two weeks ended December 28,
2002 assuming that EITF Issue No. 02-16 had been in place for all periods
presented.
Concentrate Supply
We buy concentrate, the critical flavor ingredient for our products, from
PepsiCo, its affiliates and other brand owners who are the sole authorized
suppliers. Concentrate prices are typically determined annually. PepsiCo
determines concentrate prices at its sole discretion. In February 2004, PepsiCo
increased the price of U.S. concentrate by 0.7%. PepsiCo has recently announced
a further increase of approximately 2%, effective February 2005.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - 2004
VOLUME
52 WEEKS ENDED
DECEMBER 25, 2004 VS.
DECEMBER 27, 2003
--------------------------
WORLD- OUTSIDE
WIDE U.S. THE U.S.
------ ---- --------
Base volume............................... 2% 2% 3%
Acquisitions.............................. 1% 0% 1%
--- -- ----
Total Volume Change...................... 3% 2% 4%
=== == ====
Our full-year reported worldwide physical case volume increased three
percent in 2004 versus 2003. Worldwide volume growth reflects increases in the
U.S., Europe and Canada, partially offset by a flat performance in Mexico.
In the U.S., volume increased by two percent in 2004 versus 2003, driven
by a four percent increase in our cold-drink channel and a one percent increase
in our take-home channel. During 2004, we had solid results in our convenience
and gas segment and foodservice business segment, which consists of our
on-premise and full-service vending account customers. From a brand perspective,
Trademark PEPSI's volume was down one percent for the year, due to declines in
brand PEPSI and PEPSI TWIST, partially offset by solid growth from our diet
portfolio. Our non-carbonated soft drink portfolio increased 11% for the full
year led by the introduction of TROPICANA JUICE DRINKS and continued growth from
AQUAFINA.
In Europe, volume grew ten percent in 2004 versus 2003, driven by
double-digit increases in Russia and Turkey. In Russia, we had solid growth in
our core brands, coupled with contributions from new product introductions,
including TROPICANA JUICE and LIPTON ICED TEA. In Turkey, we continue to improve
in the areas of execution and distribution, which resulted in volume increases
in brand PEPSI, AQUAFINA and local brands.
Total volume in Mexico, excluding the impact of acquisitions, was flat for
the year. Volume trends in Mexico improved during the second half of the year,
increasing four percent versus the prior year. Improvement in the second half of
the year reflected improved marketplace execution, brand and package innovation
and our focus on
18
consumer value. During the second half of the year, we saw increases in each of
our jug, bottled water and carbonated soft drink categories. Increases in the
second half of the year were offset by volume declines in the first half of the
year driven primarily by our jug water business.
NET REVENUES
52 WEEKS ENDED
DECEMBER 25, 2004 VS.
DECEMBER 27, 2003
-----------------------
WORLD OUTSIDE
-WIDE U.S. THE U.S.
----- ----- --------
Volume impact............................ 2% 2% 3%
Net price per case impact (rate/mix)..... 3% 3% 1%
Acquisitions............................. 0% 0% 1%
Currency translation..................... 1% 0% 3%
---- ---- ----
Total Net Revenues Change.............. 6% 5% 8%
==== ==== ====
Worldwide net revenues were $10.9 billion in 2004, a six percent increase
over the prior year. The increase in net revenues for the year was driven by
improvements in volume, growth in net price per case and the favorable impact
from currency translation.
In the U.S., net revenues increased five percent in 2004 versus 2003. The
increases in net revenues in the U.S. were driven by growth in both volume and
net price per case. Increases in net price per case in the U.S. were due to a
combination of rate increases, primarily in cans, and mix benefits from the sale
of higher-priced products.
Net revenues outside the U.S. grew approximately eight percent in 2004
versus 2003. The increases in net revenues outside the U.S. were driven
primarily by growth in volume and net price per case in Europe and Canada,
coupled with the favorable impact of foreign exchange. This growth was partially
offset by net revenue declines in Mexico. Net revenues in Mexico declined three
percent on a full-year basis due primarily to the devaluation of the Mexican
peso. In local currency, our net price per case in Mexico in 2004 was flat
versus the prior year.
COST OF SALES
52 WEEKS ENDED
DECEMBER 25, 2004 VS.
DECEMBER 27, 2003
---------------------
WORLD OUTSIDE
-WIDE U.S. THE U.S.
------ ---- --------
Volume impact..................... 2% 2% 3%
Cost per case impact ............. 5% 5% 4%
Acquisitions...................... 0% 0% 1%
Currency translation ............. 1% 0% 3%
---- ---- -----
Total Cost of Sales Change........ 8% 7% 11%
==== ==== =====
Worldwide cost of sales was $5.7 billion in 2004, an eight percent
increase over 2003. The growth in cost of sales per case was driven primarily by
significant increases in raw material costs, coupled with mix shifts into more
expensive products and packages and the negative impact of foreign currency
translation.
In the U.S., cost of sales grew seven percent in 2004 versus 2003, due to
volume growth and increases in cost per case. The increases in cost per case
resulted from higher commodity costs, primarily driven by aluminum and resin,
coupled with the impact of mix shifts into more expensive products and packages.
Cost of sales outside the U.S. grew approximately eleven percent in 2004
versus 2003, reflecting increases in cost per case and volume, coupled with the
negative impact from foreign currency translation. Growth in cost per case was
driven by increases in Europe and Mexico. In Europe, we have experienced higher
sweetener costs in Turkey and mix shifts into more expensive products in Russia.
In Mexico, sweetener costs have increased throughout the year, coupled with a
steep rise in resin costs in the fourth quarter. Foreign currency translation
19
contributed three percentage points of growth, reflecting the appreciation of
the euro and Canadian dollar, partially offset by the devaluation of the Mexican
peso.
SELLING, DELIVERY AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
52 WEEKS ENDED
DECEMBER 25, 2004 VS.
DECEMBER 27, 2003
----------------------
WORLD OUTSIDE
-WIDE U.S. THE U.S.
----- ---- --------
Cost impact....................... 4% 4% 3%
Acquisitions...................... 0% 0% 1%
Currency translation ............. 1% 0% 2%
---- ---- ----
Total SD&A Change................ 5% 4% 6%
==== ==== ====
Worldwide selling, delivery and administrative expenses were $4.3 billion,
a five percent increase over 2003. Increases in selling, delivery and
administrative costs were driven by higher operating costs in the U.S. and
Europe coupled with the negative impact of foreign currency translation.
In the U.S., increases reflect higher labor and benefit costs. These
increases were partially offset by reduced operating costs driven from a number
of productivity initiatives we put in place during 2004, coupled with a
reduction in our bad debt expense.
Outside the U.S., increases were driven primarily by higher operating
costs in Russia and Turkey and the negative impact of foreign currency
throughout Europe and Canada. These increases were partially offset by declines
in Mexico due to the devaluation of the Mexican peso and reduced operating
costs. We have consolidated a number of warehouses and distribution systems in
Mexico and are starting to capitalize on productivity gains and reduced costs.
These results also include a $9 million non-cash impairment charge that is
related to our re-evaluation of the fair value of our franchise licensing
agreement for the SQUIRT trademark in Mexico, as a result of a change in its
estimated accounting life. See Note 6 in Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements for additional information.
INTEREST INCOME
Interest income was $34 million in 2004. Flat performance versus the
prior year reflects an increase in interest income from notes from PBG,
partially offset by a decrease in interest income from third parties.
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense decreased by $11 million to $166 million in 2004 largely
due to lower effective interest rates achieved on our long-term debt.
INCOME TAX EXPENSE
Bottling LLC is a limited liability company, taxable as a partnership for
U.S. tax purposes and, as such, generally pays no U.S. federal or state income
taxes. The federal and state distributable share of income, deductions and
credits of Bottling LLC are allocated to Bottling LLC's owners based on
percentage ownership. However, certain domestic and foreign affiliates pay
income taxes in their respective jurisdictions. Such amounts are reflected in
our Consolidated Statements of Operations. Our full-year effective tax rate for
2004 was 0.4%. This rate corresponds to an effective tax rate of 10.4% in 2003.
The decrease in our effective tax rate versus the prior year is due largely to
the lapping of an $11 million tax charge relating to a Canadian tax law change
in the fourth quarter of 2003. Additionally, in 2004, we had the following
significant tax items, which decreased our tax expense by approximately $44
million:
- Mexico tax rate change - In December 2004, legislation was enacted
changing the Mexican statutory income tax rate. This rate change
decreased our net deferred tax liabilities and resulted in a $26 million
tax benefit in the fourth quarter.
- Tax reserves - During 2004, we adjusted previously established
liabilities for tax exposures due largely to the settlement of certain
international tax audits. The adjustment of these liabilities resulted
in an $18 million tax benefit for the year.
20
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - 2003
VOLUME
52 WEEKS ENDED
DECEMBER 27, 2003 VS.
DECEMBER 28, 2002
---------------------
WORLD OUTSIDE
-WIDE U.S. THE U.S.
----- ---- --------
Acquisitions...................... 20% 0 % 74%
Base business..................... 0% (2)% 4%
-- -- --
Total Volume Change............... 20% (2)% 78%
== == ==
Our full-year reported worldwide physical case volume increased 20% in
2003 versus 2002. The increase in reported worldwide volume was due entirely to
our acquisitions. Our acquisition of Gemex contributed more than 90% of the
growth resulting from acquisitions.
In the U.S., our base business volume decreased 2% versus 2002 due to
changes in consumer preferences, declines in our cold drink business and
weakness in retail traffic. (The term "base business" reflects territories that
we owned and operated for comparable periods in both the current year and the
prior year.) However, during the second half of 2003, we saw improvement in our
cold drink business as we began to implement changes to ensure that we have the
right consumer value and the right space allocation for our products in the cold
vaults. From a brand perspective, as consumers sought more variety, we saw
declines in brand PEPSI, partially offset by strong growth in AQUAFINA and
lemon-lime volume, led by SIERRA MIST, coupled with product introductions such
as PEPSI VANILLA and MOUNTAIN DEW LIVEWIRE.
Outside the U.S., our base business volume increased by 4%. The increase
in base business volume outside the U.S. was driven by warm summer weather in
Europe, coupled with a strong performance in Russia, resulting from growth in
AQUA MINERALE and the launch of PEPSI X.
NET REVENUES
52 WEEKS ENDED
DECEMBER 27, 2003 VS.
DECEMBER 28, 2002
-----------------------
WORLD OUTSIDE
-WIDE U.S. THE U.S.
----- ---- --------
Acquisitions....................... 11 % 1 % 61 %
---- --- ---
Base business:
EITF Issue No. 02-16 impact...... (3)% (3)% (4)%
Currency translation............. 2 % 0 % 10 %
Rate / mix impact (pricing)...... 1 % 2 % 3 %
Volume impact.................... 0 % (2)% 4 %
--- --- ---
Base business change............... 0 % (3)% 13 %
--- --- ---
Total Net Revenues Change.......... 11 % (2)% 74 %
=== === ===
Net revenues were $10.3 billion in 2003, an 11% increase over the prior
year. Approximately 72% of our net revenues was generated in the United States,
11% of our net revenues was generated in Mexico and the remaining 17% was
generated outside the United States and Mexico. The increase in net revenues in
2003 was driven primarily by our acquisition of Gemex, which contributed more
than 85% of the growth resulting from acquisitions. Our base business net
revenues were flat in 2003 versus 2002. In 2003, base business net revenues were
favorably impacted by foreign currency translation and price increases, offset
by the reclassification of certain bottler incentives from net revenues to cost
of sales resulting from the adoption of EITF Issue No. 02-16.
21
In the U.S., net revenues decreased 2% in 2003 versus 2002. The decrease
in U.S. net revenues was due to a decline in volume and the impact of adopting
EITF Issue No. 02-16. This was partially offset by a 2% increase in marketplace
pricing and incremental revenue from acquisitions. Net revenues outside the U.S.
grew approximately 74% in 2003 versus 2002. The increase in net revenues outside
the U.S. was driven by our Gemex acquisition and an increase in our base
business revenues of 13%. The increase in base business net revenues outside the
U.S. was the result of favorable foreign currency translation in Canada and
Europe, volume growth, and a 3% increase in pricing, partially offset by a
decline due to the impact of adopting EITF Issue No. 02-16.
COST OF SALES
52 WEEKS ENDED
DECEMBER 27, 2003 VS.
DECEMBER 28, 2002
-----------------------
WORLD OUTSIDE
-WIDE U.S. THE U.S.
----- ---- --------
Acquisitions........................ 10 % 1 % 51 %
---- --- ----
Base business:
EITF Issue No. 02-16 impact....... (10)% (9)% (17)%
Cost per case impact.............. 2 % 3 % 4 %
Currency translation.............. 2 % 0 % 8 %
Volume impact..................... 0 % (2)% 4 %
---- --- ----
Base business change................ (6)% (8)% (1)%
---- --- ----
Total Cost of Sales Change.......... 4 % (7)% 50 %
==== === ====
Cost of sales was $5.2 billion in 2003, a 4% increase over 2002. The
increase in cost of sales was due primarily to our acquisition of Gemex, which
contributed more than 80% of the growth resulting from acquisitions, partially
offset by a decline in our base business costs. The decline in base business
cost of sales was due primarily to the reclassification of certain bottler
incentives from net revenues and selling, delivery and administrative expenses
to cost of sales resulting from the adoption of EITF Issue No. 02-16, partially
offset by increases in cost per case and the negative impact of foreign currency
translation.
In the U.S., cost of sales decreased 7% in 2003 versus 2002. The decrease
in U.S. cost of sales was driven by volume declines and the impact of adopting
EITF Issue No. 02-16, partially offset by cost per case increases and
incremental costs from acquisitions. In the U.S., cost per case increased by 3%
resulting from higher concentrate and resin costs, coupled with the mix of
products we sell.
Our base business cost of sales outside the U.S. decreased approximately
1% in 2003 versus 2002. The decrease in base business cost of sales outside the
U.S. was driven from the impact of adopting EITF Issue No. 02-16, partially
offset by the negative impact of foreign currency translation in Canada and
Europe, and increases in both cost per case and volume.
22
SELLING, DELIVERY AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
52 WEEKS ENDED
DECEMBER 27, 2003 VS.
DECEMBER 28, 2002
---------------------
WORLD OUTSIDE
-WIDE U.S. THE U.S.
----- ---- -------
Acquisitions...................... 14 % 1 % 76 %
---- --- ------
Base business:
EITF Issue No. 02-16 impact..... 6 % 4 % 18 %
Currency translation............ 2 % 0 % 11 %
Cost performance................ 1 % 0 % 4 %
---- --- ------
Base business change.............. 9 % 4 % 33 %
---- --- ------
Total SD&A Change................. 23 % 5 % 109 %
==== === ======
Selling, delivery and administrative expenses were $4.1 billion in 2003, a
23% increase over 2002. The increase in selling, delivery and administrative
expenses was driven primarily by our acquisition of Gemex and increases in our
base business costs. Gemex contributed more than 90% of the growth resulting
from acquisitions. The 9% increase in our base business selling, delivery and
administrative expenses was due to the reclassification of certain bottler
incentives from selling, delivery and administrative expenses to cost of sales
resulting from the adoption of EITF Issue No. 02-16, coupled with the impact of
foreign currency translation in Canada and Europe and an increase in our base
business cost performance. Our base business cost performance increased 1% as a
result of higher pension, employee benefit and casualty costs, partially offset
by a reduction in our bad debt expense and productivity gains due to
improvements in our operational efficiencies and selling execution to the
marketplace.
OPERATING INCOME
Operating income was $961 million in 2003, a 7% increase over 2002. The
increase in operating income was due primarily to our acquisition of Gemex. Our
base business operating income was flat versus the prior year resulting from
increased selling, delivery and administrative expenses, offset by the
improvement in the net impact of gross margin rate and mix in the U.S. and
Europe, coupled with the favorable impact of foreign currency translation in
Canada and Europe.
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense increased by $46 million to $177 million in 2003 largely
due to the additional interest associated with the $1 billion 4.63% senior notes
used to finance our acquisition of Gemex in November 2002 and the additional
$1.2 billion of debt issued during 2003. This was partially offset by the lower
effective interest rate achieved on our fixed rate long-term debt from the use
of interest rate swaps.
INTEREST INCOME
Interest income increased $1 million to $34 million in 2003 due to
additional loans made to PBG, partially offset by lower interest rates.
INCOME TAX EXPENSE BEFORE RATE CHANGE
Bottling LLC is a limited liability company, taxable as a partnership for
U.S. tax purposes and, as such, generally pays no U.S. federal or state income
taxes. The federal and state distributable share of income, deductions and
credits of Bottling LLC are allocated to Bottling LLC's owners based on
percentage ownership. However, certain domestic and foreign affiliates pay
income taxes in their respective jurisdictions. Such amounts are reflected in
our Consolidated Statements of Operations. Our full-year effective tax rate for
2003 was 9.0% before our income tax rate change expense. This rate corresponds
to an effective tax rate of 6.4% in 2002. The increase in the effective tax rate
is primarily due to our international acquisitions.
23
INCOME TAX RATE CHANGE EXPENSE (BENEFIT)
In December 2003, legislation was enacted changing certain Canadian
provincial income tax rates. These rate changes increased deferred tax
liabilities by $11 million and resulted in a non-cash charge in 2003.
LIQUIDITY AND FINANCIAL CONDITION
CASH FLOWS
Fiscal 2004 Compared with Fiscal 2003
Net cash provided by operations grew by $198 million to $1,401 million in
2004. Increases in net cash provided by operations were driven by higher
profits, lower pension contributions and working capital improvements, which
includes the lapping of a one-time payment in 2003 relating to the settlement of
our New Jersey wage and hour litigation.
Net cash used for investments decreased by $53 million to $1,233 million,
principally reflecting less notes receivable from PBG and higher proceeds from
sales of property, plant and equipment, partially offset by higher capital
spending.
Net cash used for financing increased by $2,175 million to $1,150 million
driven primarily by the repayment of our $1.0 billion note in February 2004,
lower proceeds from long-term borrowings and increased distributions to owners,
partially offset by higher short-term borrowings.
Fiscal 2003 Compared with Fiscal 2002
Our net cash provided by operations of $1,203 million was driven by the
strong cash flow generated from the sale of our products. Net operating cash
flow grew by $96 million over the prior year due primarily to the incremental
cash generated by our Mexican business. This increase was partially offset by
higher tax payments for jurisdictions outside the U.S. and the settlement of our
New Jersey wage and hour litigation.
Net cash used for investments decreased by $550 million to $1,286 million,
reflecting lower acquisition spending during 2003 and the lapping of a $181
million investment in our debt defeasance trust in the prior year, partially
offset by increases in notes receivable from PBG and capital expenditures.
Net cash provided by financing increased by $348 million to $1,025
million, driven by an increase in our proceeds from long-term debt, lower short
and long-term borrowing repayments and decreased distributions to owners.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We believe that our future cash flows from operations and borrowing
capacity will be sufficient to fund capital expenditures, acquisitions and
working capital requirements for PBG and us for the foreseeable future.
During the first quarter, we repaid our $1 billion 5.38% senior notes with
the proceeds we received from debt issued in the prior year.
In 2002, we purchased $181 million in U.S. government securities and
placed those securities into an irrevocable trust, for the sole purpose of
funding payments of principal and interest on the $160 million of 9.75% senior
notes maturing in March 2004, in order to defease their respective covenants. In
March 2004, we repaid our $160 million of 9.75% senior notes by liquidating our
investments in our debt defeasance trust.
We had available short-term bank credit lines of approximately $381
million and $302 million at December 25, 2004 and December 27, 2003,
respectively. These lines were used to support the general operating needs of
our businesses outside the United States. As of year-end 2004, we had $77
million outstanding under these lines of credit at a weighted-average interest
rate of 3.72%. As of year-end 2003, we had $67 million outstanding under these
lines of credit at a weighted-average interest rate of 4.17%.
Certain of our senior notes have redemption features and non-financial
covenants that will, among other things, limit our ability to create or assume
liens, enter into sale and lease-back transactions, engage in mergers or
consolidations and transfer or lease all or substantially all of our assets.
Additionally, our new secured debt should not be greater than 10% of our net
tangible assets. Net tangible assets are defined as total assets less current
liabilities and net intangible assets.
We are in compliance with all debt covenants.
24
Our peak borrowing timeframe varies with our working capital requirements
and the seasonality of our business. Borrowings from our international credit
facilities peaked at $130 million, reflecting payments for working capital
requirements.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 25,
2004:
PAYMENTS DUE BY PERIOD
-------------------------------------------------------
LESS THAN 1 MORE THAN 5
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS TOTAL YEAR 1-3 YEARS 3-5 YEARS YEARS
- --------------------------------- ------ ----------- --------- --------- -----------
Long-term debt obligations (1) $ 3,553 $ 50 $ 546 $ 1,304 $ 1,653
Capital lease obligations (2) 6 2 1 1 2
Operating leases (2) 222 45 68 43 66
Interest obligations (3) 1,027 163 321 268 275
Purchase obligations:
Raw material obligations (4) 161 1 107 53 --
Capital expenditure
obligations (5) 48 48 -- -- --
Other obligations (6) 292 178 62 30 22
Other long-term liabilities (7) 26 6 11 5 4
------- ------- ------- -------- ---------
TOTAL $ 5,335 $ 493 $ 1,116 $ 1,704 $ 2,022
======= ======= ======= ======== =========
(1) See Note 8 in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional
information relating to our long-term debt obligations.
(2) See Note 9 in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional
information relating to our lease obligations.
(3) Represents interest payment obligations related to our long-term fixed-rate
debt as specified in the applicable debt agreements. Additionally, a portion
of our long-term debt has variable interest rates due to either existing
swap agreements or interest arrangements. We estimated our variable interest
payment obligations by using the interest rate forward curve.
(4) Represents obligations to purchase raw materials pursuant to contracts
entered into by PepsiCo on our behalf.
(5) Represents commitments to suppliers under capital expenditure related
contracts or purchase orders.
(6) Represents noncancellable agreements that specify fixed or minimum
quantities, price arrangements and timing of payments. Also includes
agreements that provide for termination penalty clauses.
(7) Primarily relates to contractual obligations associated with non-compete
contracts that resulted from business acquisitions. The table excludes other
long-term liabilities included in our Consolidated Financial Statements,
such as pension, postretirement and other non-contractual obligations. See
Note 11 in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of
our future pension and postretirement contributions and corresponding
expected benefit payments for years 2005 through 2014.
25
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
PBG has a $500 million commercial paper program that is supported by a
credit facility. The credit facility is guaranteed by us and expires in April
2009. There are certain financial covenants associated with this credit
facility. PBG has used this credit facility to support its commercial paper
program in 2004 and 2003. At December 25, 2004, PBG had $78 million in
outstanding commercial paper with a weighted-average interest rate of 2.32%. At
December 27, 2003, PBG had no outstanding commercial paper.
On March 8, 1999, PBG issued $1 billion of 7% senior notes due 2029, which
are guaranteed by us. We also guarantee, that to the extent there is available
cash, we will distribute pro rata to all owners sufficient cash such that
aggregate cash distributed to PBG will enable PBG to pay its taxes and make
interest payments on the $1 billion 7% senior notes due 2029. During 2004 and
2003, we made cash distributions to our owners totaling $185 million and $97
million, respectively. Any amounts in excess of taxes and interest payments were
used by PBG to repay loans to us.
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
Our business requires substantial infrastructure investments to maintain
our existing level of operations and to fund investments targeted at growing our
business. Capital infrastructure expenditures totaled $717 million, $644 million
and $623 million during 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
During 2005, we plan to spend between $675 million and $725 million in
capital expenditures.
ACQUISITIONS
During 2004, we acquired the operations and exclusive right to
manufacture, sell and distribute Pepsi-Cola beverages from four franchise
bottlers. The following acquisitions occurred for an aggregate purchase price of
$95 million in cash and assumption of liabilities of $22 million:
- Gaseosas, S.A. de C.V. of Mexicali, Mexico in March
- Seltzer and Rydholm, Inc. of Auburn, Maine in October
- Phil Gaudreault et Fils Ltee of Quebec, Canada in November
- Bebidas Purificada, S.A. de C.V. of Juarez, Mexico in November
As a result of these acquisitions, we have assigned $5 million to
goodwill, $66 million to franchise rights and $3 million to non-compete
arrangements. The goodwill and franchise rights are not subject to amortization.
The non-compete agreements are being amortized over five to ten years. The
allocations of the purchase price for these acquisitions are still preliminary
and will be determined based on the estimated fair value of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed as of the dates of acquisitions. The operating results of
each of our acquisitions are included in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements from its respective date of purchase. These acquisitions were made to
enable us to provide better service to our large retail customers. We expect
these acquisitions to reduce costs through economies of scale.
During 2004, we also paid $1 million for the purchase of certain
distribution rights relating to SOBE.
During 2003, we acquired the operations and exclusive right to
manufacture, sell and distribute beverages from three franchise bottlers. The
following acquisitions occurred for an aggregate purchase price of $91 million
in cash and the assumption of liabilities of $13 million:
- Pepsi-Cola Buffalo Bottling Corp. of Buffalo, New York in February
- Cassidy's Beverage Limited of New Brunswick, Canada in February
- Olean Bottling Works, Inc. of Olean, New York in August
During 2003, we also paid $5 million for the purchase of certain
distribution rights relating to SOBE and DR PEPPER. In addition, we paid $4
million for purchase obligations relating to acquisitions made in the prior
year.
We intend to continue to pursue other acquisitions of independent PepsiCo
bottlers in the U.S., Mexico and Canada, particularly in territories contiguous
to our own, where they create shareholder value. We also intend to continue to
evaluate other international acquisition opportunities as they become available.
26
MARKET RISKS AND CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
In the normal course of business, our financial position is routinely
subject to a variety of risks. These risks include the risk associated with the
price of commodities purchased and used in our business, interest rates on
outstanding debt and currency movements of non-U.S. dollar denominated assets
and liabilities. We are also subject to the risks associated with the business
environment in which we operate, including the collectibility of accounts
receivable. We regularly assess all of these risks and have policies and
procedures in place to protect against the adverse effects of these exposures.
Our objective in managing our exposure to fluctuations in commodity
prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates is to minimize the
volatility of earnings and cash flows associated with changes in the applicable
rates and prices. To achieve this objective, we have derivative instruments to
hedge against the risk of adverse movements in commodity prices, interest rates
and foreign currency. Our company policy prohibits the use of derivative
instruments for trading or speculative purposes, and we have procedures in place
to monitor and control their use. See Note 10 in Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements for additional information relating to our derivative instruments.
A sensitivity analysis has been prepared to determine the effects that
market risk exposures may have on the fair values of our debt and other
financial instruments. To perform the sensitivity analysis, we assessed the risk
of loss in fair values from the hypothetical changes in commodity prices,
interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates on market-sensitive
instruments. Information provided by this sensitivity analysis does not
necessarily represent the actual changes in fair value that we would incur under
normal market conditions because, due to practical limitations, all variables
other than the specific market risk factor were held constant. In addition, the
results of the analysis are constrained by the fact that certain items are
specifically excluded from the analysis, while the financial instruments that
relate to the financing or hedging of those items are included. As a result, the
reported changes in the values of some financial instruments that affect the
results of the sensitivity analysis are not matched with the offsetting changes
in the values of the items that those instruments are designed to finance or
hedge.
Commodity Price Risk
We are subject to market risks with respect to commodities because our
ability to recover increased costs through higher pricing may be limited by the
competitive environment in which we operate. We use futures contracts and
options on futures in the normal course of business to hedge anticipated
purchases of certain commodities used in our operations. With respect to
commodity price risk, we currently have various contracts outstanding for
commodity purchases in 2005, which establish our purchase prices within defined
ranges. We estimate that a 10% decrease in commodity prices with all other
variables held constant would have resulted in a decrease in the fair value of
our financial instruments of $10 million and $17 million at December 25, 2004
and December 27, 2003, respectively.
Interest Rate Risk
The fair value of our fixed-rate long-term debt is sensitive to changes in
interest rates. Interest rate changes would result in gains or losses in the
fair market value of our debt, representing differences between market interest
rates and the fixed-rate on the debt. As a result of the market risk, we
effectively converted a portion of our fixed-rate debt to floating-rate debt
through the use of interest rate swaps. We estimate that a 10% decrease in
interest rates with all other variables held constant would have resulted in a
net increase in the fair value of our financial instruments (which includes both
our fixed-rate debt and our interest rate swaps) of $66 million and $75 million
at December 25, 2004 and December 27, 2003, respectively.
27
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
In 2004, approximately 28% of our net revenues came from outside the
United States. Social, economic and political conditions in these international
markets may adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows and financial
condition. The overall risks to our international businesses include changes in
foreign governmental policies and other political or economic developments.
These developments may lead to new product pricing, tax or other policies and
monetary fluctuations that may adversely impact our business. In addition, our
results of operations and the value of the foreign assets and liabilities are
affected by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.
As currency exchange rates change, translation of the statements of
operations of our businesses outside the U.S. into U.S. dollars affects
year-over-year comparability. We generally have not hedged against these types
of currency risks because cash flows from our international operations are
usually reinvested locally.
We have foreign currency transactional risks in certain of our
international territories for transactions that are denominated in currencies
that are different from their functional currency. Beginning in 2004, we have
entered into forward exchange contracts to hedge portions of our forecasted U.S.
dollar cash flows in our Canadian business. At December 25, 2004, a 10% weaker
U.S. dollar against the Canadian dollar, with all other variables held constant,
would result in a decrease in the fair value of our financial instruments of $10
million. Conversely, a 10% stronger U.S. dollar against the Canadian dollar,
with all other variables held constant, would result in an increase in the fair
value of our financial instruments of $9 million.
Foreign currency gains and losses reflect both transaction gains and
losses in our foreign operations, as well as translation gains and losses
arising from the re-measurement into U.S. dollars of the net monetary assets of
businesses in highly inflationary countries. Turkey and Russia were considered
highly inflationary economies for accounting purposes in 2002. Beginning in
2003, Russia was no longer considered highly inflationary, and as a result,
changed its functional currency from the U.S. dollar to the Russian ruble. There
was no material impact on our consolidated financial statements as a result of
Russia's change in functional currency. For 2004 and 2003, Turkey was still
considered a highly inflationary economy for accounting purposes.
Unfunded Deferred Compensation Liability
Our unfunded deferred compensation liability is subject to changes in
PBG's stock price as well as price changes in certain other equity and fixed
income investments. Employees participating in our deferred compensation program
can elect to defer all or a portion of their compensation to be paid out on a
future date or dates. As part of the deferral process, employees select from
phantom investment options that determine the earnings on the deferred
compensation liability and the amount that they will ultimately receive.
Employee investment elections include PBG stock and a variety of other equity
and fixed-income investment options.
Since the plan is unfunded, employees' deferred compensation amounts are
not directly invested in these investment vehicles. Instead, we track the
performance of each employee's investment selections and adjust his or her
deferred compensation account accordingly. The adjustments to the employees'
accounts increase or decrease the deferred compensation liability reflected on
our Consolidated Balance Sheets with an offsetting increase or decrease to our
selling, delivery and administrative expenses.
We use prepaid forward contracts to hedge the portion of our deferred
compensation liability that is based on PBG's stock price. Therefore, changes in
compensation expense as a result of changes in PBG's stock price are
substantially offset by the changes in the fair value of these contracts. We
estimate that a 10% unfavorable change in PBG's year-end stock price would have
reduced the fair value from these commitments by $2 million in 2004 and 2003.
28
CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS
Except for the historical information and discussions contained herein,
statements contained in this annual report on Form 10-K may constitute
forward-looking statements as defined by the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are based on currently
available competitive, financial and economic data and our operating plans.
These statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors that
could cause actual results to be materially different. Among the events and
uncertainties that could adversely affect future periods are:
- - changes in our relationship with PepsiCo that could have a material
adverse effect on our long-term and short-term business and financial
results;
- - restrictions imposed by PepsiCo on our raw material suppliers that could
increase our costs;
- - material changes from expectations in the cost of raw materials and
ingredients;
- - decreased demand for our product resulting from changes in consumers'
preferences;
- - an inability to achieve volume growth through product and packaging
initiatives;
- - impact of competitive activities on our business;
- - impact of customer consolidations on our business;
- - an inability to achieve cost savings;
- - material changes in capital investment for infrastructure and an inability
to achieve the expected timing for returns on cold drink equipment and
related infrastructure expenditures;
- - material changes in expected levels of bottler incentive payments from
PepsiCo;
- - changes in product category consumption;
- - unfavorable weather conditions in our markets;
- - unforeseen economic and political changes;
- - possible recalls of our products;
- - an inability to meet projections for performance in newly acquired
territories;
- - failure or inability to comply with laws and regulations;
- - changes in laws and regulations governing the manufacture and sale of food
and beverages, including restrictions on the sale of carbonated soft
drinks in schools;
- - changes in laws and regulations governing the environment, transportation,
employee safety, labor and government contracts;
- - changes in accounting standards and taxation requirements (including
unfavorable outcomes from audits performed by various tax authorities);
- - changes in our debt ratings;
- - material changes in expected interest and currency exchange rates and
unfavorable market performance of our pension plan assets;
- - interruptions of operations due to labor disagreements;
- - loss of business from a significant customer; and
- - limitations on the availability of water or obtaining water rights.
29
BOTTLING GROUP, LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
in millions
FISCAL YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 25, 2004, DECEMBER 27, 2003 AND DECEMBER 28, 2002
2004 2003 2002
---- ---- ----
NET REVENUES ......................................................... $10,906 $10,265 $9,216
Cost of sales ........................................................ 5,656 5,215 5,001
------- ------- ------
GROSS PROFIT ......................................................... 5,250 5,050 4,215
Selling, delivery and administrative expenses ........................ 4,285 4,089 3,318
------- ------- ------
OPERATING INCOME ..................................................... 965 961 897
Interest expense ..................................................... 166 177 131
Interest income ...................................................... 34 34 33
Other non-operating expenses, net .................................... 1 7 7
Minority interest .................................................... -- -- 9
------- ------- ------
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES ........................................... 832 811 783
Income tax expense ................................................... 3 84 49
------- ------- ------
INCOME BEFORE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE .... 829 727 734
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of tax ...... -- 6 --
------- ------- ------
NET INCOME ........................................................... $ 829 $ 721 $ 734
======= ======= ======
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
30
BOTTLING GROUP, LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
in millions
FISCAL YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 25, 2004, DECEMBER 27, 2003 AND DECEMBER 28, 2002
2004 2003 2002
------- ------- -------
CASH FLOWS -- OPERATIONS
Net income ..................................................................... $ 829 $ 721 $ 734
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operations:
Depreciation ................................................................ 580 556 443
Amortization ................................................................ 13 12 8
Deferred income taxes ....................................................... (52) 63 37
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle ......................... -- 6 --
Other non-cash charges and credits, net ..................................... 150 155 103
Changes in operating working capital, excluding effects of acquisitions:
Accounts receivable, net ................................................. (41) (20) (19)
Inventories, net ......................................................... (38) 4 13
Prepaid expenses and other current assets ................................ (22) 6 14
Accounts payable and other current liabilities ........................... 107 (93) (23)
------- ------- -------
Net change in operating working capital ................................ 6 (103) (15)
------- ------- -------
Pension contributions ....................................................... (83) (162) (151)
Other, net .................................................................. (42) (45) (52)
------- ------- -------
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATIONS ................................................ 1,401 1,203 1,107
------- ------- -------
CASH FLOWS -- INVESTMENTS
Capital expenditures ........................................................... (717) (644) (623)
Acquisitions of bottlers ....................................................... (96) (100) (921)
Sales of property, plant and equipment ......................................... 22 10 6
Notes receivable from PBG, Inc., net ........................................... (442) (552) (117)
Investment in debt defeasance trust ............................................ -- -- (181)
------- ------- -------
NET CASH USED FOR INVESTMENTS .................................................. (1,233) (1,286) (1,836)
------- ------- -------
CASH FLOWS -- FINANCING
Short-term borrowings, net -- three months or less ............................. 26 8 (78)
Net proceeds from issuances of long-term debt .................................. 22 1,141 1,031
Payments of long-term debt ..................................................... (1,013) (27) (120)
Distributions to owners ........................................................ (185) (97) (156)
------- ------- -------
NET CASH (USED FOR) PROVIDED BY FINANCING ...................................... (1,150) 1,025 677
------- ------- -------
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS ................... 5 10 (8)
------- ------- -------
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS ........................... (977) 952 (60)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS -- BEGINNING OF YEAR ................................. 1,154 202 262
------- ------- -------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS -- END OF YEAR ....................................... $ 177 $ 1,154 $ 202
======= ======= =======
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Liabilities incurred and/or assumed in conjunction with acquisitions of bottlers $ 20 $ 146 $ 800
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
31
BOTTLING GROUP, LLC
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
in millions
DECEMBER 25, 2004 AND DECEMBER 27, 2003
2004 2003
-------- --------
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents ........................................ $ 177 $ 1,154
Accounts receivable, less allowance of $61 in 2004 and $72 in 2003 1,054 994
Inventories ...................................................... 427 374
Prepaid expenses and other current assets ........................ 229 194
Investment in debt defeasance trust .............................. -- 168
-------- --------
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS .......................................... 1,887 2,884
Property, plant and equipment, net ............................... 3,581 3,423
Other intangible assets, net ..................................... 3,639 3,562
Goodwill ......................................................... 1,416 1,386
Notes receivable from PBG ........................................ 1,948 1,506
Other assets ..................................................... 109 125
-------- --------
TOTAL ASSETS ............................................... $ 12,580 $ 12,886
======== ========
LIABILITIES AND OWNERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and other current liabilities ................... $ 1,279 $ 1,163
Short-term borrowings ............................................ 77 67
Current maturities of long-term debt ............................. 52 1,178
-------- --------
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES ..................................... 1,408 2,408
Long-term debt ................................................... 3,495 3,497
Other liabilities ................................................ 618 628
Deferred income taxes ............................................ 436 451
Minority interest ................................................ 3 --
-------- --------
TOTAL LIABILITIES ............................................. 5,960 6,984
-------- --------
OWNERS' EQUITY
Owners' net investment ........................................... 7,068 6,409
Accumulated other comprehensive loss ............................. (447) (503)
Deferred compensation ............................................ (1) (4)
-------- -------
TOTAL OWNERS' EQUITY .......................................... 6,620 5,902
-------- -------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND OWNERS' EQUITY ....................... $ 12,580 $12,886
======== =======
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
32
BOTTLING GROUP, LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN OWNERS' EQUITY
in millions
FISCAL YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 25, 2004, DECEMBER 27, 2003 AND DECEMBER 28, 2002
ACCUMULATED
OWNERS' OTHER
NET DEFERRED COMPREHENSIVE COMPREHENSIVE
INVESTMENT COMPENSATION LOSS TOTAL INCOME
---------- ------------ ------------- ------- -------------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 29, 2001 ................. $5,012 $ -- $(416) $ 4,596
Comprehensive income:
Net income ............................. 734 -- -- 734 $ 734
Currency translation adjustment ........ -- -- 25 25 25
Minimum pension liability adjustment ... -- -- (216) (216) (216)
Cash flow hedge adjustment ............. -- -- 11 11 11
-----
Total comprehensive income ................. $ 554
=====
Non-cash contribution from owner ........... 192 -- -- 192
Cash distributions to owners ............... (156) -- -- (156)
------ ---- ----- -------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 28, 2002 ................. 5,782 -- (596) 5,186
Comprehensive income:
Net income ............................. 721 -- -- 721 $ 721
Currency translation adjustment ........ -- -- 96 96 96
Minimum pension liability adjustment ... -- -- (34) (34) (34)
Cash flow hedge adjustment ............. -- -- 31 31 31
-----
Total comprehensive income ................. $ 814
=====
Cash distributions to owners ............... (97) -- -- (97)
Non-cash distributions from owners ......... (4) -- -- (4)
Stock compensation ......................... 7 (4) -- 3
------ ---- ----- -------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 27, 2003 ................. 6,409 (4) (503) 5,902
Comprehensive income:
Net income ............................. 829 -- -- 829 $ 829
Currency translation adjustment ........ -- -- 91 91 91
Minimum pension liability adjustment ... -- -- (29) (29) (29)
Cash flow hedge adjustment ............. -- -- (6) (6) (6)
-----
Total comprehensive income ................ $ 885
=====
Cash distributions to owners .............. (185) -- -- (185)
Non-cash contributions from owners ........ 17 -- -- 17
Stock compensation ........................ (2) 3 -- 1
------ ---- ----- -------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 25, 2004 ................. $7,068 $ (1) $(447) $ 6,620
====== ==== ===== =======
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
33
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Tabular dollars in millions
NOTE 1 -- BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Bottling Group, LLC (collectively referred to as "Bottling LLC," "we,"
"our" and "us") is the principal operating subsidiary of The Pepsi Bottling
Group, Inc. ("PBG") and consists of substantially all of the operations and
assets of PBG. Bottling LLC, which is consolidated by PBG, has the exclusive
right to manufacture, sell and distribute from Pepsi-Cola beverages, in all or a
portion of the United States, Mexico, Canada, Spain, Greece, Russia and Turkey.
In conjunction with PBG's initial public offering and other subsequent
transactions, PBG and PepsiCo, Inc. ("PepsiCo") contributed bottling businesses
and assets used in the bottling businesses to Bottling LLC. As a result of the
contribution of these assets, PBG owns 93.2% of Bottling LLC and PepsiCo owns
the remaining 6.8% as of December 25, 2004.
Certain reclassifications were made in our Consolidated Financial
Statements to 2003 amounts to conform to the 2004 presentation.
NOTE 2 -- SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
("U.S. GAAP") requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported
amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from these estimates. For
additional unaudited information on certain accounting policies, see "Critical
Accounting Policies" in Management's Financial Review.
BASIS OF CONSOLIDATION - The accounts of all of our wholly and
majority-owned subsidiaries are included in the accompanying Consolidated
Financial Statements. We have eliminated intercompany accounts and transactions
in consolidation.
FISCAL YEAR - Our U.S. and Canadian operations report using a fiscal year
that consists of fifty-two weeks, ending on the last Saturday in December. Every
five or six years a fifty-third week is added. Fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002
each consisted of fifty-two weeks. In 2005, our fiscal year will consist of
fifty-three weeks (the additional week is added to the fourth quarter). Our
remaining countries report using a calendar-year basis. Accordingly, we
recognize our quarterly business results as outlined below:
Quarter U.S. & Canada Mexico & Europe
- -------------- ------------- ----------------------------
First Quarter 12 weeks January and February
Second Quarter 12 weeks March, April and May
Third Quarter 12 weeks June, July and August
Fourth Quarter 16 weeks September, October, November
and December
REVENUE RECOGNITION - We recognize revenue when our products are delivered
to customers. We offer certain sales incentives to our customers, which are
accounted for as a reduction in our net revenues when the sales incentives are
earned. A number of these arrangements are based upon annual and quarterly
targets that generally do not exceed one year. Based upon forecasted volume and
other performance criteria, net revenues are reduced by the expected amounts to
be paid out to our customers.
ADVERTISING AND MARKETING COSTS - We are involved in a variety of programs
to promote our products. We include advertising and marketing costs in selling,
delivery and administrative expenses and expense such costs during the fiscal
year incurred, generally in proportion to revenue, based on annual targets.
Advertising and marketing costs were $426 million, $453 million and $441 million
in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, before bottler incentives received from
PepsiCo and other brand owners.
BOTTLER INCENTIVES - PepsiCo and other brand owners provide us with
various forms of bottler incentives. These incentives are mutually agreed upon
between us and PepsiCo and other brand owners and cover a variety of
initiatives, including direct marketplace support, capital equipment funding and
advertising support. Based on the
34
objective of the programs and initiatives, we record bottler incentives as an
adjustment to net revenues, cost of sales or selling, delivery and
administrative expenses. Beginning in 2003, due to the adoption of Emerging
Issues Task Force ("EITF") Issue No. 02-16, "Accounting by a Customer (Including
a Reseller) for Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor," we changed our
accounting methodology for the way we record bottler incentives. Prior to 2003,
we classified worldwide bottler incentives received from PepsiCo and other brand
owners as adjustments to net revenues and selling, delivery and administrative
expenses depending on the objective of the program. Beginning in 2003, we have
classified bottler incentives as follows:
- - Direct marketplace support represents PepsiCo's and other brand owners'
agreed-upon funding to assist us in offering sales and promotional
discounts to retailers and is generally recorded as an adjustment to cost
of sales. If the direct marketplace support is a reimbursement for a
specific, incremental and identifiable program, the funding is recorded as
an adjustment to net revenues. Prior to 2003, all direct marketplace
support was recorded as an adjustment to net revenues.
- - Capital equipment funding is designed to help offset the costs of
purchasing and installing marketing equipment, such as vending machines
and glass door coolers at customer locations and is recorded as a
reduction of cost of sales. Prior to 2003, capital equipment funding was
recorded as a reduction to selling, delivery and administrative expenses.
- - Advertising support represents agreed-upon funding to assist us for the
cost of media time and promotional materials and is generally recorded as
an adjustment to cost of sales. Advertising support that represents
reimbursement for a specific, incremental and identifiable media cost, is
recorded as a reduction to advertising and marketing expenses within
selling, delivery and administrative expenses. Prior to 2003, all funding
for media costs was recorded as an adjustment to selling, delivery and
administrative expenses.
Total bottler incentives recognized as adjustments to net revenues, cost
of sales and selling, delivery and administrative expenses in our Consolidated
Statements of Operations were as follows:
52 WEEKS ENDED
2004 2003 2002
---- ---- ----
Net revenues.................................................... $ 22 $ 21 $293
Cost of sales................................................... 559 561 --
Selling, delivery and administrative expenses................... 84 108 311
---- ---- ----
Total bottler incentives..................................... $665 $690 $604
==== ==== ====
See "New Accounting Standards" for the pro forma disclosure to our
reported results for the fifty-two weeks ended December 28, 2002, assuming that
EITF Issue No. 02-16 had been in place for all periods presented.
SHIPPING AND HANDLING COSTS - Our shipping and handling costs are recorded
primarily within selling, delivery and administrative expenses. Such costs
recorded within selling, delivery and administrative expenses totaled $1,564
million, $1,438 million and $1,213 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
FOREIGN CURRENCY GAINS AND LOSSES - We translate the balance sheets of our
foreign subsidiaries that do not operate in highly inflationary economies at the
exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date, while we translate the
statements of operations at the average rates of exchange during the year. The
resulting translation adjustments of our foreign subsidiaries are recorded
directly to accumulated other comprehensive loss. Foreign currency gains and
losses reflect both transaction gains and losses in our foreign operations, as
well as translation gains and losses arising from the remeasurement into U.S.
dollars of the net monetary assets of businesses in highly inflationary
countries. Turkey and Russia were considered highly inflationary economies for
accounting purposes in 2002. Beginning in 2003, Russia was no longer considered
highly inflationary, and as a result, changed its functional currency from the
U.S. dollar to the Russian ruble. There was no material impact on our
consolidated financial statements as a result of Russia's change in functional
currency. For 2004 and 2003, Turkey was still considered a highly inflationary
economy for accounting purposes.
PENSION AND POSTRETIREMENT MEDICAL BENEFIT PLANS - PBG sponsors pension
and other postretirement medical benefit plans in various forms covering
substantially all employees who meet eligibility requirements. We account for
PBG's defined benefit pension plans and postretirement medical benefit plans
using actuarial models required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
("SFAS") No. 87, "Employers' Accounting for Pensions," and SFAS No. 106,
"Employers' Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions."
35
The assets, liabilities and assumptions used to measure pension and
postretirement medical expense for any fiscal year are determined as of
September 30 of the preceding year ("measurement date"). The discount rate
assumption used in our pension and postretirement medical benefit plans'
accounting is based on current interest rates for high-quality, long-term
corporate debt as determined on each measurement date. In evaluating the rate of
return on PBG's assets for a given fiscal year, we consider the 10-15 year
historical return of PBG's pension investment portfolio, reflecting the weighted
return of PBG's pension plan asset allocation. Differences between actual and
expected returns are generally recognized in the net periodic pension
calculation over five years. To the extent the amount of all unrecognized gains
and losses exceeds 10% of the larger of the pension benefit obligation or plan
assets, such amount is amortized over the average remaining service life of
active participants. We amortize prior service costs on a straight-line basis
over the average remaining service period of employees expected to receive
benefits.
INCOME TAXES - We are a limited liability company, taxable as a
partnership for U.S. tax purposes and, as such, generally will pay no U.S.
federal or state income taxes. Our federal and state distributable share of
income, deductions and credits will be allocated to our owners based on their
percentage of ownership. However, certain domestic and foreign affiliates pay
taxes in their respective jurisdictions and record related deferred income tax
assets and liabilities. The tax bases of our assets and liabilities reflect our
best estimate of the tax benefit and costs we expect to realize. We establish
valuation allowances to reduce our deferred tax assets to an amount that will
more likely than not be realized.
Significant management judgment is required in determining our effective
tax rate and in evaluating our tax position. We establish reserves when, despite
our belief that our tax return positions are supportable, we believe these
positions may be challenged. We adjust these reserves as warranted by changing
facts and circumstances. A change in our tax reserves could have a significant
impact on our results of operations.
CASH EQUIVALENTS - Cash equivalents represent funds we have temporarily
invested with original maturities not exceeding three months.
ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS - A portion of our accounts receivable
will not be collected due to customer disputes, bankruptcies and sales returns.
We provide reserves for these situations based on the evaluation of the aging of
our trade receivable portfolio and an in-depth analysis of our high-risk
customers. Our reserves contemplate our historical loss rate on receivables,
specific customer situations and the economic environments in which we operate.
INVENTORIES - We value our inventories at the lower of cost or net
realizable value. The cost of our inventory is generally computed on the
first-in, first-out method.
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT - We state property, plant and equipment
("PP&E") at cost, except for PP&E that has been impaired, for which we write
down the carrying amount to estimated fair market value, which then becomes the
new cost basis.
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET - Goodwill and intangible assets
with indefinite useful lives are not amortized, but instead tested annually for
impairment.
We evaluate our identified intangible assets with indefinite useful lives
for impairment annually (unless it is required more frequently because of a
triggering event) on an individual basis or by asset groups on a
country-by-country basis, depending on the nature of the intangible asset. We
measure impairment as the amount by which the carrying value exceeds its
estimated fair value. Based upon our annual impairment analysis performed in the
fourth quarter of 2004, the estimated fair values of our identified intangible
assets with indefinite lives exceeded their carrying amounts. However, we
recorded a $9 million non-cash impairment charge in the fourth quarter due to
our re-evaluation of the fair value of our franchise licensing agreement for
SQUIRT resulting from our negotiations with Cadbury in December 2004. See Note 6
- - Other Intangible Assets, Net and Goodwill for additional information.
We evaluate goodwill on a country-by-country basis ("reporting unit") for
impairment. We evaluate each reporting unit for impairment based upon a two-step
approach. First, we compare the fair value of our reporting unit with its
carrying value. Second, if the carrying value of our reporting unit exceeds its
fair value, we compare the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill
to its carrying amount to measure the amount of impairment loss. In measuring
the implied fair value of goodwill, we would allocate the fair value of the
reporting unit to each of its assets and liabilities (including any unrecognized
intangible assets). Any excess of the fair value of the reporting unit over the
amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of
goodwill. Based upon our annual impairment analysis in the fourth quarter of
2004, the estimated fair value of our reporting units exceeded their carrying
value, and as a result, we did not need to proceed to the second step of the
impairment test.
36
Other identified intangible assets that are subject to amortization are
amortized on a straight-line basis over the period in which we expect to receive
economic benefit and are reviewed for impairment when facts and circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable. The
determination of the expected life will be dependent upon the use and underlying
characteristics of the intangible asset. In our evaluation of the intangible
assets, we consider the nature and terms of the underlying agreements, the
customer's attrition rate, competitive environment and brand history, as
applicable. If the carrying value is not recoverable, impairment is measured as
the amount by which the carrying value exceeds its estimated fair value. Fair
value is generally estimated based on either appraised value or other valuation
techniques.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND RISK MANAGEMENT - We use derivative instruments
to hedge against the risk of adverse movements associated with commodity prices,
interest rates and foreign currency. Our policy prohibits the use of derivative
instruments for trading or speculative purposes, and we have procedures in place
to monitor and control their use.
All derivative instruments are recorded at fair value as either assets or
liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Derivative instruments are
generally designated and accounted for as either a hedge of a recognized asset
or liability ("fair value hedge") or a hedge of a forecasted transaction ("cash
flow hedge"). The derivative's gain or loss recognized in earnings is recorded
consistent with the expense classification of the underlying hedged item.
If a fair value or cash flow hedge were to cease to qualify for hedge
accounting or were terminated, it would continue to be carried on the balance
sheet at fair value until settled, but hedge accounting would be discontinued
prospectively. If a forecasted transaction was no longer probable of occurring,
amounts previously deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss would be
recognized immediately in earnings.
On occasion, we enter into derivative instruments that do not qualify for
hedge accounting. These instruments are reflected in the Consolidated Balance
Sheets at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings.
We also may enter into a derivative instrument for which hedge accounting
is not required because it is entered into to offset changes in the fair value
of an underlying transaction recognized in earnings ("natural hedge"). These
instruments are reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value with
changes in fair value recognized in earnings.
STOCK-BASED EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION - We measure stock-based compensation
expense using the intrinsic value method in accordance with Accounting
Principles Board ("APB") Opinion 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,"
and its related interpretations. Accordingly, compensation expense for PBG stock
option and restricted stock grants to our employees is measured as the excess of
the quoted market price of common stock at the grant date over the amount the
employee must pay for the stock. Our policy is to grant PBG stock options based
upon the fair value of the PBG stock on the date of grant. As allowed by SFAS
No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure,
an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123," we have elected to continue to apply
the intrinsic value-based method of accounting described above, and have adopted
the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation." If we had measured compensation cost for the stock-based awards
granted to our employees under the fair value-based method prescribed by SFAS
No. 123, net income would have been changed to the pro forma amounts set forth
below:
52 WEEKS ENDED
2004 2003 2002
---- ---- ----
Net income:
As reported..................................................... $829 $721 $734
Add: Total stock-based employee compensation expense
included in reported net income............................ -- 4 --
Less: Total stock-based employee compensation expense
under fair value-based method for all awards............... (65) (74) (70)
---- ---- ----
Pro forma....................................................... $764 $651 $664
==== ==== ====
Pro forma compensation cost measured for equity awards granted to
employees is amortized using a straight-line basis over the vesting period,
which is typically three years.
37
The fair value of PBG stock options used to compute pro forma net income
disclosures was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton
option-pricing model based on the following weighted-average assumptions:
2004 2003 2002
------- ------- -------
Risk-free interest rate........................ 3.2% 2.9% 4.5%
Expected life.................................. 6 years 6 years 6 years
Expected volatility............................ 35% 37% 37%
Expected dividend yield........................ 0.68% 0.17% 0.16%
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES - We are subject to various claims and
contingencies related to lawsuits, taxes, environmental and other matters
arising out of the normal course of business. Liabilities related to commitments
and contingencies are recognized when a loss is probable and reasonably
estimable.
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
EITF ISSUE NO. 02-16
As discussed above in Note 2, the EITF reached a consensus on Issue No.
02-16 in 2003, addressing the recognition and income statement classification of
various cash consideration given by a vendor to a customer. In accordance with
EITF Issue No. 02-16, we have classified certain bottler incentives as a
reduction of cost of sales beginning in 2003. During 2003, we recorded a
transition adjustment of $6 million, net of taxes of $1 million, for the
cumulative effect on prior years. This adjustment reflects the amount of bottler
incentives that can be attributed to our 2003 beginning inventory balances.
Assuming that EITF Issue No. 02-16 had been in place for all periods presented,
the following pro forma adjustments would have been made to our reported results
for the fifty-two weeks ended December 28, 2002:
52 WEEKS ENDED DECEMBER 28, 2002
--------------------------------
AS EITF 02-16 PRO FORMA
REPORTED ADJUSTMENT RESULTS
-------- ---------- ----------
Net revenues................................................ $9,216 $(290) $8,926
Cost of sales............................................... 5,001 (491) 4,510
Selling, delivery and administrative expenses............... 3,318 201 3,519
------ ----- ------
Operating income............................................ $ 897 $ -- $ 897
====== ===== ======
Assuming EITF Issue No. 02-16 had been adopted for all periods presented,
pro forma net income for the fifty-two weeks ended December 25, 2004, December
27, 2003, and December 28, 2002, would have been as follows:
52 WEEKS ENDED
------------------------------
DECEMBER DECEMBER DECEMBER
25, 2004 27, 2003 28, 2002
-------- -------- --------
Net income:
As reported............................................ $829 $721 $734
Pro forma.............................................. $829 $727 $734
FASB STAFF POSITION FAS 106-2
During the second quarter of 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards
Board ("FASB") issued FASB Staff Position FAS 106-2, "Accounting and Disclosure
Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and
Modernization Act of 2003." See Note 11 - Pension and Postretirement Medical
Benefit Plans for further details regarding the impact of FASB Staff Position
FAS 106-2.
SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS
During the fourth quarter of 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R,
"Share-Based Payments: an amendment of FASB Statements 123 and 95," which
requires companies to expense the fair value of share-based payments provided to
employees. The grant-date fair value of the employee share options and similar
instruments will be
38
estimated using option-pricing models. SFAS No. 123R becomes effective for
interim periods beginning after June 15, 2005. We are currently evaluating the
impact of this proposed standard on our financial statements.
NOTE 3 -- INVENTORIES
2004 2003
---- -----
Raw materials and supplies............................................................... $ 159 $ 140
Finished goods........................................................................... 268 234
----- -----
$ 427 $ 374
===== =====
NOTE 4 -- PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS
2004 2003
----- -----
Prepaid expenses......................................................................... $ 180 $ 150
Other assets............................................................................. 49 44
----- -----
$ 229 $ 194
===== =====
NOTE 5 -- PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET
2004 2003
------ ------
Land .................................................................................... $ 257 $ 241
Buildings and improvements .............................................................. 1,263 1,185
Manufacturing and distribution equipment ................................................ 3,289 3,028
Marketing equipment ..................................................................... 2,237 2,131
Other ................................................................................... 177 176
------ ------
7,223 6,761
Accumulated depreciation ................................................................ (3,642) (3,338)
------ ------
$3,581 $3,423
====== ======
We calculate depreciation on a straight-line basis over the estimated lives of
the assets as follows:
Buildings and improvements.......................................... 20-33 years
Manufacturing and distribution equipment............................ 2-15 years
Marketing equipment................................................. 3-7 years
39
NOTE 6 -- OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET AND GOODWILL
2004 2003
-------- -------
Intangibles subject to amortization:
Gross carrying amount:
Customer relationships and lists ......................................................... $ 46 $ 42
Franchise/distribution rights ............................................................ 44 23
Other identified intangibles ............................................................. 30 27
------- -------
120 92
------- -------
Accumulated amortization:
Customer relationships and lists ......................................................... (6) (3)
Franchise/distribution rights ............................................................ (15) (10)
Other identified intangibles ............................................................. (16) (12)
------- -------
(37) (25)
------- -------
Intangibles subject to amortization, net ...................................................... 83 67
------- -------
Intangibles not subject to amortization:
Carrying amount:
Franchise rights ......................................................................... 2,958 2,908
Distribution rights ...................................................................... 288 286
Trademarks ............................................................................... 208 207
Other identified intangibles ............................................................. 102 94
------- -------
Intangibles not subject to amortization ....................................................... 3,556 3,495
------- -------
Total other intangible assets, net ............................................................ $ 3,639 $ 3,562
======= =======
Goodwill ...................................................................................... $ 1,416 $ 1,386
======= =======
In 2004, total other intangible assets, net and goodwill increased by
approximately $107 million due to the following:
OTHER
INTANGIBLE
GOODWILL ASSETS, NET TOTAL
-------- ----------- -------
Balance at December 27, 2003 ....................................................... $1,386 $ 3,562 $ 4,948
Purchase price allocations relating to recent acquisitions ...................... 9 65 74
Impact of foreign currency translation .......................................... 21 31 52
Intangible asset impairment charge .............................................. -- (9) (9)
Increase in pension asset ....................................................... -- 3 3
Amortization of intangible assets ............................................... -- (13) (13)
------ ------- -------
Balance at December 25, 2004 ....................................................... $1,416 $ 3,639 $ 5,055
====== ======= =======
During the fourth quarter we recorded a $9 million non-cash impairment
charge ($6 million net of tax) in selling, delivery and administrative expenses
relating to our re-evaluation of the fair value of our franchise licensing
agreement for the SQUIRT trademark in Mexico, as a result of a change in its
estimated accounting life. The franchise licensing agreements for the SQUIRT
trademark were considered to have an indefinite life and granted The Pepsi
Bottling Group Mexico S.R.L. ("PBG Mexico") the exclusive right to produce,
sell, and distribute beverages under the SQUIRT trademark in certain territories
of Mexico. In December 2004, Cadbury Bebidas, S.A. de C.V. ("Cadbury Mexico"),
the owner of the SQUIRT trademark, sent PBG Mexico notices that purportedly
terminated the SQUIRT licenses for these territories effective January 15, 2005.
PBG Mexico believes that these licenses continue to be in effect and that
Cadbury Mexico has no legally supportable basis to terminate the licenses.
However, as a result of these recent unanticipated actions, PBG Mexico is no
longer certain that it will have the right to distribute SQUIRT in Mexico after
certain of its contractual rights expire in 2015. Accordingly, we have concluded
that the franchise rights relating to the SQUIRT trademark should no longer be
considered to have an indefinite life, but should be treated as having a 10-year
life for accounting purposes. Due to the reduction in the useful life of these
40
franchise rights, we wrote the carrying value of the SQUIRT franchise rights
down to its current estimated fair value. The remaining carrying value will be
amortized over the estimated useful life of 10 years, resulting in approximately
$2 million of expense each year, starting in 2005.
We measured the fair value of SQUIRT's franchise rights using a
multi-period excess earnings method, which was based upon estimated discounted
future cash flows for 10 years. We deducted a contributory charge from our net
after-tax cash flows for the economic return attributable to the working capital
and property, plant and equipment, for SQUIRT'S franchise rights. The net
discounted cash flows in excess of the fair returns on these assets represent
the fair value of the SQUIRT franchise rights.
In 2003, total other intangible assets, net and goodwill increased by
approximately $261 million due to the following:
OTHER
INTANGIBLE
GOODWILL ASSETS, NET TOTAL
-------- ----------- ------
Balance at December 28, 2002 .................................................. $1,192 $ 3,495 $ 4,687
Purchase price allocations relating to recent acquisitions ................. 163 66 229
Impact of foreign currency translation .................................... 31 8 39
Increase in pension asset ................................................. -- 5 5
Amortization of intangible assets ......................................... -- (12) (12)
------ ------- -------
Balance at December 27, 2003 ................................................. $1,386 $ 3,562 $ 4,948
====== ======= =======
For intangible assets subject to amortization, we calculate amortization
expense over the period we expect to receive economic benefit. Total
amortization expense was $13 million, $12 million and $8 million in 2004, 2003
and 2002, respectively. The weighted-average amortization period for each
category of intangible assets and its estimated aggregate amortization expense
expected to be recognized over the next five years are as follows:
ESTIMATED AGGREGATE AMORTIZATION EXPENSE TO BE INCURRED
WEIGHTED -------------------------------------------------------
AVERAGE
AMORTIZATION
PERIOD FISCAL YEAR ENDING
------------ ------------------
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
Customer relationships and lists......... 17 years $3 $3 $3 $3 $3
Franchise/distribution rights........... 7 years $6 $4 $3 $2 $2
Other identified intangibles............. 7 years $5 $4 $3 $2 $1
NOTE 7 -- ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES
2004 2003
------ ------
Accounts payable........................................................................... $ 493 $ 392
Trade incentives........................................................................... 201 220
Accrued compensation and benefits.......................................................... 222 162
Other accrued taxes........................................................................ 117 114
Other current liabilities.................................................................. 246 275
------ ------
$1,279 $1,163
====== ======
41
NOTE 8 -- SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS AND LONG-TERM DEBT
2004 2003
------ -------
Short-term borrowings
Current maturities of long-term debt.................................................... $ 52 $ 1,178
Other short-term borrowings ............................................................ 77 67
------ -------
$ 129 $ 1,245
====== =======
Long-term debt
5.63% (4.85% effective rate) (1) senior notes due 2009................................. $1,300 $ 1,300
5.38% (3.53% effective rate) (1) senior notes due 2004................................. - 1,000
4.63% (4.57% effective rate) senior notes due 2012................................. 1,000 1,000
2.45% (2.26% effective rate) (1) senior notes due 2006................................. 500 500
5.00% (5.12% effective rate) senior notes due 2013................................. 400 400
4.13% (4.35% effective rate) senior notes due 2015................................. 250 250
9.75% (3.70% effective rate) (2) senior notes due 2004................................. - 160
Other (average rate 3.34%).............................................................. 107 67
------ -------
3,557 4,677
Add: SFAS No. 133 adjustment (3)........................................................ (4) 3
Fair value adjustment relating to purchase accounting.............................. - 3
Less: Unamortized discount, net.......................................................... 6 8
Current maturities of long-term debt............................................... 52 1,178
------ -------
$3,495 $ 3,497
====== =======
(1) Effective interest rates include the impact of the gain/loss realized on
swap instruments and represent the rates that were achieved in 2004.
(2) Effective interest rate includes the impact resulting from the fair value
adjustment relating to our acquisition of Gemex.
(3) In accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 133, the portion of our
fixed-rate debt obligations that is hedged is reflected in our Consolidated
Balance Sheets as an amount equal to the sum of the debt's carrying value plus a
SFAS No. 133 fair value adjustment representing changes recorded in the fair
value of the hedged debt obligations attributable to movements in market
interest rates.
Maturities of long-term debt as of December 25, 2004, are 2005: $52
million, 2006: $509 million, 2007: $38 million, 2008: $4 million, 2009: $1,300
million and thereafter, $1,654 million. The maturities of long-term debt do not
include the non-cash impact of the SFAS No. 133 adjustment and the interest
effect of the unamortized discount.
Our $1.3 billion of 5.63% senior notes due in 2009 and our $1.0 billion of
4.63% senior notes due in 2012 are guaranteed by PepsiCo.
During the first quarter, we repaid our $1 billion 5.38% senior notes with
the proceeds we received from debt issued in the prior year.
In 2002, we purchased $181 million in U.S. government securities and
placed those securities into an irrevocable trust, for the sole purpose of
funding payments of principal and interest on the $160 million of 9.75% senior
notes maturing in March 2004, in order to defease their respective covenants. In
March 2004, we repaid our $160 million of 9.75% senior notes by liquidating our
investments in our debt defeasance trust.
We had available short-term bank credit lines of approximately $381
million and $302 million at December 25, 2004 and December 27, 2003,
respectively. These lines were used to support the general operating needs of
our businesses outside the United States. As of year end 2004, we had $77
million outstanding under these lines of credit at a weighted-average interest
rate of 3.72%. As of year end 2003, we had $67 million outstanding under these
lines of credit at a weighted-average interest rate of 4.17%.
42
Certain of our senior notes have redemption features and non-financial
covenants and will, among other things, limit our ability to create or assume
liens, enter into sale and lease-back transactions, engage in mergers or
consolidations and transfer or lease all or substantially all of our assets.
Additionally, our new secured debt should not be greater than 10% of our net
tangible assets (net tangible assets are defined as total assets less current
liabilities and net intangible assets).
We are in compliance with all debt covenants.
Amounts paid to third parties for interest, net of cash received from our
interest rate swaps, was $163 million, $173 million and $128 million in 2004,
2003 and 2002, respectively.
At December 25, 2004, we have outstanding letters of credit, bank
guarantees and surety bonds valued at $61 million from financial institutions
primarily to provide collateral for estimated self-insurance claims and other
insurance requirements.
NOTE 9 -- LEASES
We have noncancellable commitments under both capital and long-term
operating leases, which consist principally of buildings, office equipment and
machinery. Capital and operating lease commitments expire at various dates
through 2072. Most leases require payment of related executory costs, which
include property taxes, maintenance and insurance.
Our future minimum commitments under noncancellable leases are set forth
below:
LEASES
------
CAPITAL OPERATING
------- ---------
2005............................................ $ 2 $ 45
2006............................................ 1 37
2007............................................ - 31
2008............................................ - 23
2009............................................ 1 20
Later years..................................... 2 66
--- ----
$ 6 $222
=== ====
At December 25, 2004, the present value of minimum payments under capital
leases was $4 million, after deducting $2 million for imputed interest. Our
rental expense was $75 million, $69 million and $62 million for 2004, 2003 and
2002, respectively. We plan to receive $6 million of sublease income for the
periods 2005 through 2013.
NOTE 10 -- FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND RISK MANAGEMENT
CASH FLOW HEDGES - We are subject to market risk with respect to the cost
of commodities because our ability to recover increased costs through higher
pricing may be limited by the competitive environment in which we operate. We
use future and option contracts to hedge the risk of adverse movements in
commodity prices related primarily to anticipated purchases of aluminum and fuel
used in our operations. These contracts generally range from one to 12 months in
duration and qualify for cash flow hedge accounting treatment.
We are subject to foreign currency transactional risks in certain of our
international territories for transactions that are denominated in currencies
that are different from their functional currency. Beginning in 2004, we have
entered into forward exchange contracts to hedge portions of our forecasted U.S.
dollar purchases in our Canadian business. These contracts generally range from
one to 12 months in duration and qualify for cash flow hedge accounting
treatment.
We have also entered into treasury rate future contracts to hedge against
adverse interest rate changes on debt issued in 2003 and 2002.
For a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the change in the fair
value of a derivative instrument, which is highly effective, is deferred in
accumulated other comprehensive loss until the underlying hedged item is
recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of a fair value change on a
qualifying cash flow hedge is recognized in earnings immediately and is recorded
consistent with the expense classification of the underlying hedged item.
43
The following summarizes activity in accumulated other comprehensive loss
(AOCL) related to derivatives designated as cash flow hedges held by the Company
during the applicable periods:
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 25, 2004
- ----------------------------
Accumulated net gains as of December 27, 2003.......... $23
Net changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges...... 29
Net gains reclassified from AOCL into earnings......... (35)
---
ACCUMULATED NET GAINS AS OF DECEMBER 25, 2004.......... $17
===
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 27, 2003
- ----------------------------
Accumulated net losses as of December 28, 2002......... $ (8)
Net changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges...... 29
Net losses reclassified from AOCL into earnings........ 2
----
ACCUMULATED NET GAINS AS OF DECEMBER 27, 2003.......... $ 23
====
Assuming no change in the commodity prices and foreign currency rates as
measured on December 25, 2004, $14 million of the deferred gain will be
recognized in earnings over the next 12 months. The ineffective portion of the
change in fair value of these contracts was not material to our results of
operations in 2004, 2003 or 2002.
FAIR VALUE HEDGES - We finance a portion of our operations through
fixed-rate debt instruments. We effectively converted $800 million of our senior
notes to floating rate debt through the use of interest rate swaps with the
objective of reducing our overall borrowing costs. These interest rate swaps
meet the criteria for fair value hedge accounting and are 100% effective in
eliminating the market rate risk inherent in our long-term debt. Accordingly,
any gain or loss associated with these swaps is fully offset by the opposite
market impact on the related debt. The change in fair value of the interest rate
swaps was a decrease of $7 million and $20 million in 2004 and 2003,
respectively. In 2004, the fair value change of our swaps and debt have been
recorded in other liabilities and long-term debt in our Consolidated Balance
Sheets. In 2003, the fair value change of our swaps and debt have been recorded
in other assets and long-term debt in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
UNFUNDED DEFERRED COMPENSATION LIABILITY - Our unfunded deferred
compensation liability is subject to changes in PBG's stock price as well as
price changes in other equity and fixed-income investments. Participating
employees in our deferred compensation program can elect to defer all or a
portion of their compensation to be paid out on a future date or dates. As part
of the deferral process, employees select from phantom investment options that
determine the earnings on the deferred compensation liability and the amount
that they will ultimately receive. Employee investment elections include PBG
stock and a variety of other equity and fixed-income investment options.
Since the plan is unfunded, employees' deferred compensation amounts are
not directly invested in these investment vehicles. Instead, we track the
performance of each employee's investment selections and adjust his or her
deferred compensation account accordingly. The adjustments to the employees'
accounts increases or decreases the deferred compensation liability reflected on
our Consolidated Balance Sheets with an offsetting increase or decrease to our
selling, delivery and administrative expenses.
We use prepaid forward contracts to hedge the portion of our deferred
compensation liability that is based on PBG's stock price. At December 25, 2004,
we had a prepaid forward contract for 638,000 of PBG's shares at an exercise
price of $26.90, which was accounted for as a natural hedge. This contract
requires cash settlement and has
44
a fair value at December 25, 2004, of $17 million recorded in prepaid expenses
and other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair value of
this contract changes based on the change in PBG's stock price compared with the
contract exercise price. We recognized $2 million in income in 2004 and $1
million in losses in 2003, resulting from the change in fair value of these
prepaid forward contracts. The earnings impact from these instruments is
classified as selling, delivery and administrative expenses.
OTHER FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - Financial assets with carrying
values approximating fair value include cash and cash equivalents and accounts
receivable. Financial liabilities with carrying values approximating fair value
include accounts payable and other accrued liabilities and short-term debt. The
carrying value of these financial assets and liabilities approximates fair value
due to their short maturities and since interest rates approximate current
market rates for short-term debt.
Long-term debt at December 25, 2004, had a carrying value and fair value
of $3.5 billion and $3.6 billion, respectively, and at December 27, 2003, had a
carrying value and fair value of $4.7 billion and $4.8 billion, respectively.
The fair value is based on interest rates that are currently available to us for
issuance of debt with similar terms and remaining maturities.
NOTE 11 -- PENSION AND POSTRETIREMENT MEDICAL BENEFIT PLANS
PENSION BENEFITS
Our U.S. employees participate in PBG's noncontributory defined benefit
pension plans, which cover substantially all full-time salaried employees, as
well as most hourly employees. Benefits generally are based on years of service
and compensation, or stated amounts for each year of service. All of PBG's
qualified plans are funded and contributions are made in amounts not less than
minimum statutory funding requirements and not more than the maximum amount that
can be deducted for U.S. income tax purposes. Our net pension expense for the
defined benefit plans for our operations outside the U.S. was not significant
and is not included in the tables presented below.
Nearly all of our U.S. employees are also eligible to participate in PBG's
401(k) savings plans, which are voluntary defined contribution plans. We make
matching contributions to the 401(k) savings plans on behalf of participants
eligible to receive such contributions. If a participant has one or more but
less than 10 years of eligible service, our match will equal $0.50 for each
dollar the participant elects to defer up to 4% of the participant's pay. If the
participant has 10 or more years of eligible service, our match will equal $1.00
for each dollar the participant elects to defer up to 4% of the participant's
pay.
PENSION
----------------------
Components of U.S. pension expense: 2004 2003 2002
---- ---- ----
Service cost .................................................. $ 43 $ 37 $ 28
Interest cost ................................................. 69 63 56
Expected return on plan assets ................................ (83) (67) (66)
Amortization of prior service amendments ...................... 7 6 6
Amortization of net loss ...................................... 25 13 --
Special termination benefits .................................. -- -- 1
---- ---- ----
Net pension expense for the defined benefit plans ............. $ 61 $ 52 $ 25
---- ---- ----
Defined contribution plans expense ............................ $ 19 $ 19 $ 18
---- ---- ----
Total pension expense recognized in the Consolidated Statements
of Operations ................................................. $ 80 $ 71 $ 43
==== ==== ====
45
POSTRETIREMENT MEDICAL BENEFITS
PBG's postretirement medical plans provide medical and life insurance
benefits principally to our U.S. retirees and their dependents. Employees are
eligible for benefits if they meet age and service requirements and qualify for
retirement benefits. The plans are not funded and since 1993 have included
retiree cost sharing.
POSTRETIREMENT
----------------------
Components of U.S. postretirement benefits expense: 2004 2003 2002
---- ---- ----
Service cost ........................................ $ 4 $ 3 $ 3
Interest cost ....................................... 18 19 17
Amortization of net loss ............................ 6 5 2
Amortization of prior service amendments ............ (1) (2) (6)
---- ---- ----
Net postretirement benefits expense recognized in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations .............. $ 27 $ 25 $ 16
==== ==== ====
CHANGES IN THE PROJECTED BENEFIT OBLIGATIONS
PENSION POSTRETIREMENT
-------------------- ----------------
2004 2003 2004 2003
-------- -------- ------ ------
Obligation at beginning of year $ 1,129 $ 953 $ 312 $ 286
Service cost .................. 43 37 4 3
Interest cost ................. 69 63 18 19
Plan amendments ............... 11 11 -- --
Actuarial loss ................ 48 112 19 22
Benefit payments .............. (46) (47) (22) (18)
LTD medical merger (1) ........ -- -- 62 --
Gain due to Medicare subsidy .. -- -- (14) --
Transfers ..................... (2) -- -- --
------- ------- ----- -----
Obligation at end of year ..... $ 1,252 $ 1,129 $ 379 $ 312
======= ======= ===== =====
(1) In 2004, we merged our long-term disability medical plan with our
postretirement medical plan. Our long-term disability medical plan has been
amended to provide coverage for two years for participants becoming disabled
after January 1, 2005. Participants currently receiving benefits will be
grandfathered under the existing benefits program. The liabilities and
respective costs associated with these participants have been added to our
postretirement medical plan. If we merged our long-term disability medical plan
into our postretirement medical plan in 2003, our projected benefit obligation
would have increased by $53 million.
CHANGES IN THE FAIR VALUE OF ASSETS
PENSION POSTRETIREMENT
----------------- --------------
2004 2003 2004 2003
------- ------ ---- -----
Fair value at beginning of year.................................. $ 809 $ 538 $-- $--
Actual return on plan assets..................................... 101 121 -- --
Transfers........................................................ (2) -- -- --
Employer contributions........................................... 163 197 22 18
Benefit payments................................................. (46) (47) (22) (18)
------ ----- --- ---
Fair value at end of year........................................ $1,025 $ 809 $-- $--
====== ===== === ===
46
ADDITIONAL PLAN INFORMATION
PENSION POSTRETIREMENT
------------------- --------------
2004 2003 2004 2003
------- ------- ----- ----
Projected benefit obligation........................................ $ 1,252 $ 1,129 $379 $312
Accumulated benefit obligation...................................... $ 1,150 $ 1,006 $379 $312
Fair value of plan assets (1)....................................... $ 1,033 $ 899 $ -- $ --
(1) Includes fourth quarter employer contributions.
The accumulated and projected obligations for all plans exceed the fair
value of assets.
FUNDED STATUS RECOGNIZED ON THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
PENSION POSTRETIREMENT
----------------- ----------------
2004 2003 2004 2003
----- ------ ------ ------
Funded status at end of year........................................ $(227) $(320) $(379) $(312)
Unrecognized prior service cost..................................... 50 46 (6) (7)
Unrecognized loss................................................... 458 453 145 127
Fourth quarter employer contribution................................ 8 90 8 6
---- ---- ----- -----
Net amounts recognized.............................................. $289 $269 $(232) $(186)
==== ==== ===== =====
NET AMOUNTS RECOGNIZED IN THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
PENSION POSTRETIREMENT
----------------- ----------------
2004 2003 2004 2003
------ ------- ------ ------
Other liabilities................................................... $(136) $ (124) $(232) $(186)
Intangible assets................................................... 50 47 -- --
Accumulated other comprehensive loss................................ 375 346 -- --
----- ------ ----- -----
Net amounts recognized.............................................. $ 289 $ 269 $(232) $(186)
===== ====== ===== =====
Increase in minimum liability included in accumulated other
comprehensive loss in Owners' Equity................................ $ 29 $ 34 $ -- $ --
===== ====== ===== =====
At December 25, 2004, and December 27, 2003, the accumulated benefit
obligation of PBG's U.S. pension plans exceeded the fair market value of the
plan assets resulting in the recognition of the unfunded liability as a minimum
balance sheet liability. As a result of this additional liability, our
intangible asset increased by $3 million to $50 million in 2004, which equals
the amount of unrecognized prior service cost in our plans. The remainder of the
liability that exceeded the unrecognized prior service cost was recognized as an
increase to accumulated other comprehensive loss of $29 million and $34 million
in 2004 and 2003, respectively, in our Consolidated Statements of Changes in
Owners' Equity.
ASSUMPTIONS
The weighted-average assumptions used to measure net expense for years
ended:
PENSION POSTRETIREMENT
--------------------- ---------------------
2004 2003 2002 2004 2003 2002
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----
Discount rate........................... 6.25% 6.75% 7.50% 6.25% 6.75% 7.50%
Expected return on plan assets(1)........ 8.50% 8.50% 9.50% N/A N/A N/A
Rate of compensation increase........... 4.20% 4.34% 4.33% 4.20% 4.34% 4.33%
(1) Expected return on plan assets is presented after administration expenses.
47
The weighted-average assumptions used to measure the benefit liability as
of the end of the year were as follows:
PENSION POSTRETIREMENT
------------ --------------
2004 2003 2004 2003
---- ---- ---- -----
Discount rate........................... 6.15% 6.25% 6.15% 6.25%
Rate of compensation increase........... 3.60% 4.20% 3.60% 4.20%
We have evaluated these assumptions with our actuarial advisors and we
believe that they are appropriate, although an increase or decrease in the
assumptions or economic events outside our control could have a material impact
on reported net income.
FUNDING AND PLAN ASSETS
ALLOCATION PERCENTAGE
-------------------------
Asset Category TARGET ACTUAL ACTUAL
- -------------- ------ ------ ------
2005 2004 2003
---- ---- ----
Equity securities............................ 70%-75% 75% 74%
Debt securities.............................. 25%-30% 25% 26%
The table above shows the target allocation and actual allocation. PBG's
target allocations of the plan assets reflect the long-term nature of our
pension liabilities. None of the assets are invested directly in equity or debt
instruments issued by Bottling LLC, PBG, PepsiCo or any bottling affiliates of
PepsiCo, although it is possible that insignificant indirect investments exist
through our broad market indices. The plan's equity investments are diversified
across all areas of the equity market (i.e., large, mid and small capitalization
stocks as well as international equities). The plan's fixed income investments
are also diversified and consist of both corporate and U.S. government bonds. We
currently do not invest directly into any derivative investments. The plan's
assets are held in a pension trust account at our trustee's bank.
PBG's pension investment policy and strategy are mandated by PBG's Pension
Investment Committee (PIC) and are overseen by the PBG Board of Directors'
Compensation and Management Development Committee. The plan's assets are
invested using a combination of enhanced and passive indexing strategies. The
performance of the plan's assets is benchmarked against market indices and
reviewed by the PIC. Changes in investment strategies, asset allocations and
specific investments are approved by the PIC prior to execution.
HEALTH CARE COST TREND RATES
We have assumed an average increase of 10.0% in 2005 in the cost of
postretirement medical benefits for employees who retired before cost sharing
was introduced. This average increase is then projected to decline gradually to
5.0% in 2013 and thereafter.
Assumed health care cost trend rates have an impact on the amounts
reported for postretirement medical plans. A one-percentage point change in
assumed health care costs would have the following impact:
1% 1%
-- --
INCREASE DECREASE
-------- --------
Effect on total fiscal year 2004 service and interest cost components........... $1 $ (-)
Effect on the fiscal year 2004 accumulated postretirement benefit obligation.... $8 $ (7)
On May 19, 2004, FASB Staff Position No. FAS 106-2 ("FSP") was issued by
FASB to provide guidance relating to the prescription drug subsidy provided by
the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003
("Act"). We currently provide postretirement medical benefits to a group of
retirees (employees who retired prior to the beginning of 1989) with little or
no cost sharing. Additionally, we provide postretirement medical benefits to
another group of retirees (employees who retired between 1989 and 1992) that
will have cost sharing once their annual costs are twice the 2004 costs. For
these retiree groups, the prescription
48
drug benefit provided by us would be considered to be actuarially equivalent to
the benefit provided under the Act. Therefore, we retroactively applied the FSP
to the date of enactment. As a result:
- The obligation (accumulated projected benefit obligation) decreased
by $14.3 million, and
- The net periodic postretirement medical benefits cost decreased by
$1.1 million for the year ended December 25, 2004.
There were no changes in estimates of participation or per capita claims
costs as a result of the Act.
The specific authoritative guidance on the accounting for the Act is
pending and that guidance, when issued, could require us to change previously
reported information.
We also provide postretirement medical benefits to another group of
retirees (employees who retired after 1992) with cost sharing. At present, due
to the lack of clarifying regulations related to the Act, we cannot determine if
the benefit provided by us would be considered actuarially equivalent to the
benefit provided under the Act and therefore, we cannot determine its impact on
our financial statements.
PENSION AND POSTRETIREMENT CASH FLOW
Our contributions are made in accordance with applicable tax regulations
that provide us and our owners with current tax deductions for our contributions
and for taxation to the employee when the benefits are received. We do not fund
PBG's pension plan and postretirement medical plans when our contributions would
not be tax deductible or when benefits would be taxable to the employee before
receipt. Of the total pension liabilities at December 25, 2004, $49 million
relates to plans not funded due to these unfavorable tax consequences.
EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTIONS TO U.S. PLANS PENSION POSTRETIREMENT
- ------------------------------------ -------- --------------
2003................................................................... $ 162 $18
2004 .................................................................. $ 81 $22
2005 (expected)........................................................ $ 56 $29
Our 2005 expected contributions are intended to meet or exceed the IRS
minimum requirements and provide us with current tax deductions.
EXPECTED BENEFIT PAYMENTS
The expected benefit payments made from PBG's pension and postretirement
medical plans (with and without the subsidy received from the Act) to our
participants over the next ten years are as follows:
POSTRETIREMENT
---------------------
INCLUDING EXCLUDING
MEDICARE MEDICARE
EXPECTED BENEFIT PAYMENTS PENSION SUBSIDY SUBSIDY
- ------------------------- ------- --------- ---------
2005........................................................... $ 48 $ 29 $ 29
2006........................................................... $ 51 $ 27 $ 29
2007........................................................... $ 55 $ 28 $ 29
2008........................................................... $ 59 $ 28 $ 29
2009........................................................... $ 63 $ 28 $ 30
2010 to 2014................................................... $ 400 $143 $150
NOTE 12 -- EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION PLANS
Under PBG's long-term incentive plan, PBG stock options are issued to
middle and senior management employees and vary according to salary and level
within PBG. Except as noted below, PBG options granted in 2004, 2003 and 2002
had exercise prices ranging from $24.25 per share to $30.25 per share, $18.25
per share to $25.50 per share and $23.25 per share to $29.25 per share,
respectively, expire in 10 years and generally become exercisable 25% after one
year, an additional 25% after two years, and the remainder after three years. We
measure the fair value of PBG options on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model.
49
The following table summarizes option activity during 2004:
WEIGHTED
-AVERAGE
EXERCISE
Options in millions OPTIONS PRICE
------- --------
Outstanding at beginning of year................................. 41.3 $17.19
Granted....................................................... 7.1 $29.54
Exercised..................................................... (9.3) $12.86
Forfeited..................................................... (0.7) $25.38
-----
Outstanding at end of year....................................... 38.4 $20.35
===== ======
Exercisable at end of year....................................... 23.4 $16.43
===== ======
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year... $10.81
======
The following table summarizes option activity during 2003:
WEIGHTED
-AVERAGE
EXERCISE
Options in millions OPTIONS PRICE
------- --------
Outstanding at beginning of year................................. 37.4 $15.53
Granted....................................................... 8.1 $23.27
Exercised..................................................... (3.1) $11.27
Forfeited..................................................... (1.1) $22.44
----
Outstanding at end of year....................................... 41.3 $17.19
==== ======
Exercisable at end of year....................................... 26.9 $13.93
==== ======
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year... $ 9.29
======
The following table summarizes option activity during 2002:
WEIGHTED
-AVERAGE
EXERCISE
Options in millions OPTIONS PRICE
------- --------
Outstanding at beginning of year................................. 39.7 $13.20
Granted....................................................... 6.4 $25.32
Exercised..................................................... (8.1) $11.63
Forfeited..................................................... (0.6) $16.89
----
Outstanding at end of year....................................... 37.4 $15.53
==== ======
Exercisable at end of year....................................... 19.9 $12.59
==== ======
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year... $10.89
======
50
Stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 25, 2004:
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING OPTIONS EXERCISABLE
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Options in millions
WEIGHTED
-AVERAGE WEIGHTED WEIGHTED
REMAINING -AVERAGE -AVERAGE
CONTRACTUAL EXERCISE EXERCISE
RANGE OF EXERCISE PRICE OPTIONS LIFE IN YEARS PRICE OPTIONS PRICE
- ----------------------- ------- ------------- -------- ------- ---------
$9.38-$11.49........... 4.7 5.25 $ 9.40 4.7 $ 9.40
$11.50-$15.88.......... 6.9 4.34 $11.69 6.9 $11.69
$15.89-$22.50.......... 7.9 6.38 $20.47 7.5 $20.52
$22.51-$30.25.......... 18.9 8.33 $26.21 4.3 $24.65
---- ----
38.4 6.83 $20.35 23.4 $16.43
==== ==== ====== ==== ======
RESTRICTED STOCK
For the years ended 2004, 2003, and 2002, we had 403,000, 359,000 and
8,000 shares, respectively, of PBG restricted stock outstanding. During 2004, we
granted 45,000 restricted shares of PBG with a weighted-average share price of
$24.25. During 2003, we granted 351,000 restricted shares of PBG with a
weighted-average share price of $23.46. During 2002, we granted 2,000 restricted
shares of PBG with a weighted-average share price of $28.67.
NOTE 13 -- INCOME TAXES
We are a limited liability company, taxable as a partnership for U.S. tax
purposes and, as such, generally pay no U.S. federal or state income taxes. Our
federal and state distributable share of income, deductions and credits are
allocated to our owners based on their percentage of ownership. However, certain
domestic and foreign affiliates pay income taxes in their respective
jurisdictions.
The details of our income tax provision are set forth below:
2004 2003 2002
----- ---- -----
Current:
Federal.................................................................. $ 17 $ 7 $ (3)
Foreign.................................................................. 35 12 11
State.................................................................... 2 1 4
---- ---- -----
54 20 12
---- ---- -----
Deferred:
Federal.................................................................. (3) 25 32
Foreign.................................................................. (22) 26 2
State.................................................................... -- 2 3
---- ---- -----
(25) 53 37
---- ---- -----
29 73 49
Rate change (benefit)/expense..................................... (26) 11 --
---- ---- -----
3 84 49
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle............... -- (1) --
---- ---- -----
$ 3 $ 83 $ 49
==== ==== =====
In 2004, we had the following significant tax items, which decreased our
tax expense by approximately $44 million:
- Mexico tax rate change - In December 2004, legislation was enacted
changing the Mexican statutory income tax rate. This rate change
decreased our net deferred tax liabilities and resulted in a $26
million tax benefit in the fourth quarter.
51
- Tax reserves - During 2004, we adjusted previously established
liabilities for tax exposures due largely to the settlement of
certain international tax audits. The adjustment of these
liabilities resulted in an $18 million tax benefit for the year.
Our 2003 income tax provision includes an increase in income tax expense
of $11 million due to enacted tax rate changes in Canada during the 2003 tax
year.
Our U.S. and foreign income before income taxes is set forth below:
2004 2003 2002
------ ------ ------
U.S......................................................................... $ 693 $ 684 $ 707
Foreign..................................................................... 139 127 76
------ ------ ------
Income before income taxes and cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle............................................................... $ 832 $ 811 $ 783
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle......................... -- (7) --
------ ------ ------
$ 832 $ 804 $ 783
====== ====== ======
Our reconciliation of income taxes calculated at the U.S. federal
statutory rate to our provision for income taxes is set forth below:
2004 2003 2002
-------- ------- ------
Income taxes computed at the U.S. federal statutory rate..................... 35.0% 35.0% 35.0%
Income taxable to owners..................................................... (25.4) (23.4) (26.4)
State income tax, net of federal tax benefit................................. 0.2 0.3 0.6
Impact of foreign results (1)................................................ (8.6) (10.1) (6.2)
Change in valuation allowances (1)........................................... 2.9 4.5 1.4
Nondeductible expenses....................................................... 1.6 1.5 0.8
Net international tax audit settlements ..................................... (2.2) -- --
Other, net................................................................... (0.1) 1.2 1.2
---- ---- ----
3.4 9.0 6.4
Rate change (benefit)/expense (3.0) 1.4 --
---- ---- ----
Total effective income tax rate before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle ........................................................ 0.4% 10.4% 6.4%
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle.......................... -- -- --
---- ---- ----
Total effective income tax rate ............................................. 0.4% 10.4% 6.4%
==== ==== ====
(1) In 2004, we have reclassified certain Mexican net operating losses and their
respective valuation allowances, which were recorded in 2003, to equity. We have
determined that certain net operating losses resulting from the impact of a tax
structure's foreign currency translational costs, correctly belong in equity.
This reclassification had no impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
52
The details of our 2004 and 2003 deferred tax liabilities (assets) are set
forth below:
2004 2003
------ ------
Intangible assets and property, plant and equipment.......................... $ 437 $ 480
Other........................................................................ 98 34
----- -----
Gross deferred tax liabilities............................................... 535 514
----- -----
Net operating loss carryforwards............................................. (342) (258)
Employee benefit obligations................................................. (12) (19)
Various liabilities and other................................................ (61) (67)
----- -----
Gross deferred tax assets.................................................... (415) (344)
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance....................................... 305 271
----- -----
Net deferred tax assets...................................................... (110) (73)
----- -----
Net deferred tax liability................................................... $ 425 $ 441
===== =====
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS CLASSIFICATION
Prepaid expenses and other current assets.................................... $ (11) $ (10)
Deferred income taxes........................................................ 436 451
----- -----
$ 425 $ 441
===== =====
We have net operating loss carryforwards totaling $1,177 million at
December 25, 2004, which are available to reduce future taxes in the U.S.,
Spain, Greece, Russia, Turkey and Mexico. Of these carryforwards, $9 million
expire in 2005 and $1,168 million expire at various times between 2006 and 2024.
At December 25, 2004, we have tax credit carryforwards in the U.S. of $4 million
with an indefinite carryforward period and in Mexico of $15 million, which
expire at various times between 2008 and 2014.
We establish valuation allowances for our deferred tax assets when the
amount of expected future taxable income is not likely to support the use of the
deduction or credit. Our valuation allowances, which reduce deferred tax assets
to an amount that will more likely than not be realized, have increased by $34
million in 2004 and increased by $124 million in 2003.
Approximately $17 million of our valuation allowance relating to our
deferred tax assets at December 25, 2004 would be applied to reduce goodwill if
reversed in future periods.
Deferred taxes are not recognized for temporary differences related to
investments in foreign subsidiaries that are essentially permanent in duration.
Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred taxes related to these
investments is not practicable. These undistributed earnings are approximately
$546 million at December 25, 2004. The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 was
enacted allowing for special tax breaks for the repatriation of earnings from
foreign subsidiaries. We are evaluating whether to repatriate our undistributed
foreign earnings in 2005.
Income taxes receivable from taxing authorities were $39 million and $34
million at December 25, 2004, and December 27, 2003, respectively. Such amounts
are recorded within prepaid expenses and other current assets and other
long-term assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Income taxes payable to
taxing authorities were $13 million and $22 million at December 25, 2004, and
December 27, 2003, respectively. Such amounts are recorded within accounts
payable and other current liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Income taxes receivable from related parties were $5 million and $6
million at December 25, 2004, and December 27, 2003, respectively. Such amounts
are recorded within prepaids and other current assets in our Consolidated
Balance Sheets. Amounts paid to taxing authorities and related parties for
income taxes were $63 million, $37 million and $0 million in 2004, 2003 and
2002, respectively.
53
NOTE 14 -- GEOGRAPHIC DATA
We operate in one industry, carbonated soft drinks and other
ready-to-drink beverages. We conduct business in the U.S., Mexico, Canada,
Spain, Russia, Greece and Turkey.
NET REVENUES
--------------------------
2004 2003 2002
------- ------- ------
U.S........................................................... $ 7,818 $ 7,406 $7,572
Mexico........................................................ 1,071 1,105 164
Other countries............................................... 2,017 1,754 1,480
------- ------- ------
$10,906 $10,265 $9,216
======= ======= ======
LONG-LIVED ASSETS
-----------------
2004 2003
------- -------
U.S........................................................... $ 7,814 $ 7,220
Mexico........................................................ 1,435 1,432
Other countries............................................... 1,444 1,350
------- -------
$10,693 $10,002
======= =======
NOTE 15 -- RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
PepsiCo is considered a related party due to the nature of our franchise
relationship and its ownership interest in our company.
PBG has entered into a number of agreements with PepsiCo since its initial
public offering. Although we are not a direct party to these contracts, as the
principal operating subsidiary of PBG, we derive direct benefit from them.
Accordingly, set forth below are the most significant agreements that govern our
relationship with PepsiCo:
(1) The master bottling agreement for cola beverages bearing the
"PEPSI-COLA" and "PEPSI" trademarks in the United States; master
bottling agreements and distribution agreements for non-cola
products in the United States; and a master fountain syrup agreement
in the United States;
(2) Agreements similar to the master bottling agreement and the non-cola
agreements for each country in which we operate, including Canada,
Spain, Russia, Greece, Turkey and Mexico, as well as a fountain
syrup agreement for Canada, similar to the master syrup agreement;
(3) A shared services agreement where we obtain various services from
PepsiCo, which include services for information technology
maintenance and the procurement of raw materials. We also provide
services to PepsiCo, including facility and credit and collection
support. The amounts paid or received under this contract are equal
to the actual costs incurred by the company providing the service;
and
(4) Transition agreements that provide certain indemnities to the
parties, and provide for the allocation of tax and other assets,
liabilities and obligations arising from periods prior to the
initial public offering. Under our tax separation agreement, PepsiCo
maintains full control and absolute discretion for any combined or
consolidated tax filings for tax periods ended on or before the
initial public offering.
Additionally, we review our annual marketing, advertising, management and
financial plans each year with PepsiCo for its approval. If we fail to submit
these plans, or if we fail to carry them out in all material respects, PepsiCo
can terminate our beverage agreements. If our beverage agreements with PepsiCo
are terminated for this or for any other reason, it would have a material
adverse effect on our business and financial results.
BOTTLER INCENTIVES AND OTHER ARRANGEMENTS - We share a business objective
with PepsiCo of increasing the availability and consumption of Pepsi-Cola
beverages. Accordingly, PepsiCo, at its discretion, provides us with various
forms of bottler incentives to promote its beverages. These incentives are
mutually agreed upon between us and PepsiCo and cover a variety of initiatives,
including direct marketplace support, capital equipment funding and advertising
support. Based on the objectives of the programs and initiatives, we record
bottler incentives as an adjustment to net revenues, cost of sales or selling,
delivery and administrative expenses. Beginning in 2003, due to the adoption of
EITF Issue No. 02-16, we changed our accounting methodology for the way we
record bottler incentives. See Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies for a discussion of the change in classification of these bottler
incentives in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
54
Bottler incentives received from PepsiCo, including media costs shared by
PepsiCo, were $626 million, $646 million and $560 million for 2004, 2003 and
2002, respectively. Changes in our bottler incentives and funding levels could
materially affect our business and financial results.
PURCHASES OF CONCENTRATE AND FINISHED PRODUCT - We purchase concentrate
from PepsiCo, which is the critical flavor ingredient used in the production of
carbonated soft drinks and other ready-to-drink beverages. PepsiCo determines
the price of concentrate annually at its discretion. We also pay a royalty fee
to PepsiCo for the AQUAFINA trademark. Amounts paid or payable to PepsiCo and
its affiliates for concentrate and royalty fees were $2,075 million, $1,971
million and $1,699 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
We also produce or distribute other products and purchase finished goods
and concentrate through various arrangements with PepsiCo or PepsiCo joint
ventures. During 2004, 2003 and 2002, total amounts paid or payable to PepsiCo
or PepsiCo joint ventures for these transactions were $666 million, $556 million
and $464 million, respectively.
MANUFACTURING AND DISTRIBUTION SERVICE REIMBURSEMENTS - In 2003 and 2002,
we provided manufacturing services to PepsiCo and PepsiCo affiliates in
connection with the production of certain finished beverage products. During
2003 and 2002, total amounts paid or payable by PepsiCo for these transactions
were $6 million and $10 million, respectively.
FOUNTAIN SERVICE FEE - We manufacture and distribute fountain products and
provide fountain equipment service to PepsiCo customers in some territories in
accordance with the Pepsi beverage agreements. Amounts received from PepsiCo for
these transactions are offset by the cost to provide these services and are
reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Operations in selling, delivery and
administrative expenses. Net amounts paid or payable by PepsiCo to us for these
services were approximately $180 million, $200 million and $200 million, in
2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
SHARED SERVICES - We provide and receive various services from PepsiCo and
PepsiCo affiliates pursuant to a shared services agreement and other
arrangements. Total expenses incurred with PepsiCo and PepsiCo affiliates were
approximately $68 million, $72 million and, $70 million during 2004, 2003 and
2002, respectively, and are reflected in selling, delivery and administrative
expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. Total income generated
for services provided to PepsiCo and PepsiCo affiliates was approximately $10
million, $10 million and $13 million during 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively,
and is reflected in selling, delivery and administrative expenses in our
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
FRITO-LAY PURCHASES - We purchase snack food products from Frito-Lay,
Inc., a subsidiary of PepsiCo, for sale and distribution in Russia. Amounts paid
or payable to PepsiCo and its affiliates for snack food products were $75
million, $51 million and $44 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
INCOME TAX EXPENSE - Under tax sharing arrangements we have with PepsiCo,
we received $10 million, $7 million and $3 million in tax-related benefits from
PepsiCo in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
55
The Consolidated Statements of Operations include the following income
(expense) amounts as a result of transactions with PepsiCo and its affiliates:
2004 2003 2002
--------- --------- ---------
Net revenues:
Bottler incentives........................................ $ 22 $ 21 $ 257
======== ======== ========
Cost of sales:
Purchases of concentrate and finished products,
and AQUAFINA royalty fees............................. $ (2,741) $ (2,527) $ (2,163)
Bottler incentives........................................ 522 527 --
Manufacturing and distribution service reimbursements..... -- 6 10
-------- -------- --------
$ (2,219) $ (1,994) $ (2,153)
======== ======== ========
Selling, delivery and administrative expenses:
Bottler incentives........................................ $ 82 $ 98 $ 303
Fountain service fee...................................... 180 200 200
Frito-Lay purchases....................................... (75) (51) (44)
Shared services........................................... (58) (62) (57)
-------- -------- --------
$ 129 $ 185 $ 402
======== ======== ========
Income tax expense.......................................... $ 10 $ 7 $ 3
======== ======== ========
We are not required to pay any minimum fees to PepsiCo, nor are we
obligated to PepsiCo under any minimum purchase requirements.
We paid PepsiCo $1 million, $3 million and $10 million during 2004, 2003
and 2002, respectively, for distribution rights relating to the SOBE brand in
certain PBG-owned territories in the U.S. and Canada.
Amounts receivable from PepsiCo and its affiliates at December 25, 2004
were $6 million. Such amounts are recorded in prepaid and other current assets
in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Amounts payable to PepsiCo and its
affiliates at December 27, 2003 were $20 million. Such amounts are recorded
within accounts payable and other current liabilities in our Consolidated
Balance Sheets.
PBG is considered a related party, as we are the principal operating
subsidiary of PBG and we make up substantially all of the operations and assets
of PBG. At December 25, 2004, PBG owned approximately 93.2% of our equity.
Beginning in 2002, PBG provides insurance and risk management services to
us pursuant to a contractual agreement. Total premiums paid to PBG during 2004
and 2003 were $110 million and $98 million, respectively.
We have loaned PBG $442 million and $552 million during 2004 and 2003,
respectively, net of repayments. During 2004, these loans were made through a
series of 1-year notes, with interest rates ranging from 1.6% to 2.9%. Total
intercompany loans owed to us from PBG at December 25, 2004 and December 27,
2003, were $1,948 million and $1,506 million, respectively. The proceeds were
used by PBG to pay for interest, taxes, dividends, share repurchases and
acquisitions. Accrued interest receivable from PBG on these notes totaled $28
million and $22 million at December 25, 2004 and December 27, 2003,
respectively, and is included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in
our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Total interest income recognized in our Consolidated Statements of
Operations relating to outstanding loans with PBG was $30 million, $26 million
and $24 million, in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
On March 8, 1999, PBG issued $1 billion of 7% senior notes due 2029, which
are guaranteed by us.
PBG has a $500 million commercial paper program that is supported by a
credit facility which is guaranteed by us and expires in April 2009. There are
certain financial covenants associated with these credit facilities. PBG has
used this credit facility to support its commercial paper program in 2004 and
2003. At December 25, 2004, PBG had $78 million in outstanding commercial paper
with a weighted-average interest rate of 2.32%. At December 27, 2003, PBG had no
outstanding commercial paper.
56
We also guarantee that to the extent there is available cash, we will
distribute pro rata to PBG and PepsiCo sufficient cash such that the aggregate
cash distributed to PBG will enable PBG to pay its taxes and make interest
payments on the $1 billion 7% senior notes due 2029. During 2004 and 2003, we
made cash distributions to PBG and PepsiCo totaling $185 million and $97
million, respectively. Any amounts in excess of taxes and interest payments were
used by PBG to repay loans to us.
Managing Director and Officers
One of our managing directors is an employee of PepsiCo and the other
managing directors and officers are employees of PBG.
NOTE 16 -- CONTINGENCIES
We are subject to various claims and contingencies related to lawsuits,
taxes, environmental and other matters arising out of the normal course of
business. We believe that the ultimate liability arising from such claims or
contingencies, if any, in excess of amounts already recognized is not likely to
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition
or liquidity.
In 1995, a class action suit was filed against three of our suppliers for
price fixing on the sale of high fructose corn syrup during the years between
1991 and 1995. During this time period we were still part of PepsiCo. During
2004, these suppliers have settled their respective charges. Settlement of
damages will be allocated to each class action recipient based on their
percentage of purchases of the high fructose corn syrup from these suppliers
during the period 1991 through 1995. We believe the claims process for the
allocation of settlement to each class action recipient will be finalized during
2005. Currently, we can not reasonably estimate the amount of proceeds we will
receive from the settlement of this case and accordingly have not recorded a
gain during 2004.
As of December 25, 2004, we employed approximately 64,700 workers, of whom
approximately 31,700 were employed in the United States. Approximately 8,900 of
our workers in the United States are union members and approximately 16,900 of
our workers outside the United States are union members. Approximately 50% of
the union members in the United States are covered under contracts that will
expire in 2005. We consider relations with our employees to be good and have not
experienced significant interruptions of operations due to labor disagreements
in the past.
57
NOTE 17 -- ACQUISITIONS
During 2004, we acquired the operations and exclusive right to
manufacture, sell and distribute Pepsi-Cola beverages from four franchise
bottlers. The following acquisitions occurred for an aggregate purchase price of
$95 million in cash and assumption of liabilities of $22 million:
- Gaseosas, S.A. de C.V. of Mexicali, Mexico in March
- Seltzer and Rydholm, Inc. of Auburn, Maine in October
- Phil Gaudreault et Fils Ltee of Quebec, Canada in November
- Bebidas Purificada, S.A. de C.V. of Juarez, Mexico in November
As a result of these acquisitions, we have assigned $5 million to
goodwill, $66 million to franchise rights and $3 million to non-compete
arrangements. The goodwill and franchise rights are not subject to amortization.
The non-compete agreements are being amortized over five to ten years. The
allocations of the purchase price for these acquisitions are still preliminary
and will be determined based on the estimated fair value of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed as of the dates of acquisitions. The operating results of
each of our acquisitions are included in our Consolidated Financial Statements
from its respective date of purchase. These acquisitions were made to enable us
to provide better service to our large retail customers. We expect these
acquisitions to reduce costs through economies of scale.
During 2004, we also paid $1 million for the purchase of certain
distribution rights relating to SOBE.
During 2003, we acquired the operations and exclusive right to
manufacture, sell and distribute Pepsi-Cola beverages from three franchise
bottlers. The following acquisitions occurred for an aggregate purchase price of
$91 million in cash and assumption of liabilities of $13 million:
- - Pepsi-Cola Buffalo Bottling Corp. of Buffalo, New York in February
- - Cassidy's Beverage Limited of New Brunswick, Canada in February
- - Olean Bottling Works, Inc. of Olean, New York in August
As a result of these acquisitions, we have assigned $7 million to
goodwill, $76 million to franchise rights and $5 million to non-compete
arrangements. The goodwill and franchise rights are not subject to amortization.
The non-compete agreements are being amortized over five years.
During 2003, we also paid $5 million for the purchase of certain
distribution rights relating to SOBE and DR PEPPER and paid $4 million for
purchase obligations relating to acquisitions made in the prior year.
NOTE 18 -- ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
The year-end balances related to each component of accumulated other
comprehensive loss were as follows:
2004 2003 2002
------ ------- -------
Currency translation adjustment................. $ (89) $ (180) $ (276)
Cash flow hedge adjustment...................... 17 23 (8)
Minimum pension liability adjustment............ (375) (346) (312)
----- ------ ------
Accumulated other comprehensive loss............ $(447) $ (503) $ (596)
===== ====== ======
58
NOTE 19 -- SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH
2004 QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER(1),(2) FULL YEAR
------- ------- ------- -------------- ---------
Net revenues ....... $ 2,067 $ 2,675 $ 2,934 $ 3,230 $10,906
Gross profit ....... 1,016 1,297 1,412 1,525 5,250
Operating income ... 136 273 360 196 965
Net income ......... 97 225 324 183 829
(1) Includes Mexico tax law change benefit of $26 million.
(2) Includes a $9 million non-cash impairment charge ($6 million net of tax)
relating to our re-evaluation of the fair value of our franchise licensing
agreement for the SQUIRT trademark in Mexico.
FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH
2003 QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER (3) FULL YEAR
------- ------- ------- ----------- ---------
Net revenues ....... $ 1,874 $ 2,532 $ 2,810 $ 3,049 $ 10,265
Gross profit ....... 947 1,242 1,372 1,489 5,050
Operating income ... 119 276 360 206 961
Net income ......... 70 229 307 115 721
(3) Includes Canada tax law change expense of $11 million.
59
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Owners of
Bottling Group, LLC:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Bottling Group,
LLC and subsidiaries as of December 25, 2004 and December 27, 2003, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and changes in owners'
equity for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended December 25,
2004. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over
financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over
financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial
reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining,
on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Bottling Group, LLC
and subsidiaries as of December 25, 2004 and December 27, 2003, and the results
of their operations and their cash flows for each of the fiscal years in the
three-year period ended December 25, 2004, in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company
adopted Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 02-16, "Accounting by a Customer
(Including a Reseller) for Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor," as of
December 29, 2002.
/s/ KPMG LLP
New York, New York
February 25, 2005
60
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Included in Item 7, Management's Financial Review - Market Risks and
Cautionary Statements.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Included in Item 7, Management's Financial Review - Financial Statements
The financial statements of PBG, included in PBG's Annual Report on Form
10-K and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on February
28, 2005, are hereby incorporated by reference as required by the SEC as a
result of our guarantee of up to $1,000,000,000 aggregate principal amount of
our 7% Senior Notes due in 2029.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Bottling LLC's management carried out an evaluation (the "Evaluation"), as
required by Rule 13a-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange
Act"), with the participation of our Principal Executive Officer and our
Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form
10-K. Based upon the Evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and the
Principal Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information
relating to Bottling LLC and its consolidated subsidiaries required to be
included in our Exchange Act reports filed with the SEC. In addition, there were
no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in
connection with the Evaluation that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF BOTTLING LLC
The name, age and background of each of Bottling LLC's Managing Directors
is set forth below.
JOHN T. CAHILL, 47, is a Managing Director of Bottling LLC. Mr. Cahill has also
been PBG's Chairman of the Board since January 2003 and Chief Executive Officer
since September 2001. Previously, Mr. Cahill served as PBG's President and Chief
Operating Officer from August 2000 to September 2001. Mr. Cahill has been a
member of PBG's Board of Directors since January 1999 and served as PBG's
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer prior to becoming President
and Chief Operating Officer in August 2000. He was Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of the Pepsi-Cola Company from April 1998 until November
1998. Prior to that, Mr. Cahill was Senior Vice President and Treasurer of
PepsiCo, having been appointed to that position in April 1997. In 1996, he
became Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Pepsi-Cola North
America. Mr. Cahill joined PepsiCo in 1989 where he held several other senior
financial positions through 1996.
STEVEN M. RAPP, 51, is a Managing Director of Bottling LLC. He is also PBG's
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. Appointed to this position
in January 2005, Mr. Rapp previously served as Vice President, Deputy General
Counsel and Assistant Secretary from 1999 through 2004. Mr. Rapp joined PepsiCo
as a corporate attorney in 1986 and was appointed Division Counsel of Pepsi-Cola
Company in 1994. Mr. Rapp succeeds Pamela C. McGuire who was a Managing Director
of Bottling LLC and Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of PBG
from 1998 through 2004.
MATTHEW M. MCKENNA, 54, is a Managing Director of Bottling LLC. He is also the
Senior Vice President of Finance of PepsiCo. Previously he was Senior Vice
President and Treasurer and before that, Senior Vice President, Taxes. Prior to
joining PepsiCo in 1993 as Vice President, Taxes, he was a partner with the law
firm of Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts in New York.
61
Pursuant to Item 401(b) of Regulation S-K, the executive officers of
Bottling LLC are reported in Part I of this Report. Executive officers are
elected by the Managing Directors of Bottling LLC, and their terms of office
continue until their successors are appointed and qualified or until their
earlier resignation or removal. There are no family relationships among our
executive officers. Managing Directors are elected by a majority of members of
Bottling LLC and their terms of office continue until their successors are
appointed and qualified or until their earlier resignation or removal, death or
disability.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
SUMMARY OF CASH AND CERTAIN OTHER COMPENSATION. The following table
provides information on compensation earned and equity-based awards granted for
the years indicated by PBG to Bottling LLC's Principal Executive Officer and the
two other executive officers of Bottling LLC as of the end of the 2004 fiscal
year in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
These three individuals are referred to as the named executive officers.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
LONG TERM COMPENSATION
ANNUAL COMPENSATION AWARDS PAYOUTS
------------------- ------ -------
Restricted Securities All Other
Name and Other Annual Stock Underlying LTIP Compensation
Principal Position Year Salary($) Bonus($) Compensation ($) Awards ($) Options (#) Payouts ($) ($)
- ------------------ ---- --------- -------- ---------------- ---------- ----------- ----------- ------------
John T. Cahill 2004 $871,154 $1,531,250 (1) $ 19,139 (2) $ 0 444,915 $ 0 $ 8,362 (4)
Principal 2003 817,692 515,630 26,409 1,500,000 (3) 526,596 0 8,141
Executive Officer 2002 721,154 681,500 32,227 0 287,129 0 6,843
Alfred H. Drewes 2004 383,462 404,250 19,171 (5) 0 104,407 0 8,200 (6)
Principal 2003 372,231 140,630 14,475 1,500,000 (3) 127,660 241,050 8,000
Financial Officer 2002 355,923 217,550 13,060 0 113,109 218,962 6,338
Andrea L. Forster 2004 221,154 170,250 4,695 (5) 0 45,763 0 8,200 (6)
Principal 2003 193,307 50,000 4,695 0 34,043 0 7,624
Accounting Officer 2002 187,923 92,700 5,744 0 29,941 111,219 7,498
(1) Mr. Cahill's 2004 bonus reflects the performance of the Company in 2004,
which significantly exceeded the targets established by the Compensation
and Management Development Committee.
(2) This amount reflects (i) payment of the executive's tax liability with
respect to certain Company provided perquisites and (ii) benefits from the
personal use of corporate transportation.
(3) This amount reflects a performance-based restricted stock award granted in
2003 that was scheduled to vest only if certain cumulative performance
targets were achieved in fiscal years 2003, 2004 and 2005. In light of
PBG's cumulative performance for fiscal years 2003 and 2004 relative to
the pre-established targets, it is unlikely that the cumulative
performance targets will be achieved. Accordingly, it is unlikely that
the executive will vest in any of the restricted shares reflected in the
table. The amount set out in the table was calculated by multiplying the
number of restricted shares granted to the executive by the fair market
value of PBG Common Stock on March 1, 2003, the grant date. While the
executive is unlikely to recognize any value from this award, SEC
regulations require PBG to state the dollar value of the unvested
restricted shares as of the close of the 2004 fiscal year, which was
$1,715,750 (determined by multiplying the number of restricted shares
awarded by $26.88, the closing price of PBG's Common Stock on December
23, 2004, the last trading day of PBG's fiscal year). In the unlikely
event that the performance targets are achieved and the executive
remains employed by the Company, fifty percent of the award will vest on
December 31, 2005 and fifty percent will vest on December 31, 2007.
Dividends that are declared and paid by the Company on the shares of
restricted stock shall be deferred until the shares have vested. Upon
forfeiture of any such shares, the deferred dividends shall also be
forfeited.
(4) This amount reflects (i) a standard PBG matching contribution in PBG
Common Stock to the executive's 401(k) account and (ii) $162 in imputed
income, based on tables used for income imputation, attributable to the
annual cost of life insurance coverage equal to that purchased under the
following arrangement. In 2001, Mr. Cahill waived his right to a portion
of his deferred compensation. In exchange, the Company made a loan to Mr.
Cahill's family trust to pay the premium on a life insurance policy on the
life of Mr. Cahill and his spouse. The loan bears interest at a rate of
4.99%, which rate was established under IRS regulations, and the loan
(with interest) will be repaid to the Company
62
upon payment of the proceeds from the life insurance policy. Although the
loan amount was greater than the amount of deferred compensation waived,
the loan was determined to be cost neutral to the Company. Under the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, this loan may remain outstanding, so long as
its terms are not materially modified.
(5) This amount reflects payment of the executive's tax liability with
respect to certain Company provided perquisites.
(6) This amount reflects a standard PBG matching contribution in PBG Common
Stock to the executive's 401(k) account.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
PBG holds 93.2% and PepsiCo holds 6.8% of the ownership of Bottling LLC.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Although Bottling LLC may not be a direct party to the following
transactions, as the principal operating subsidiary of PBG, it derives
certain benefits from them. Accordingly, set forth below is information
relating to certain transactions between PBG and PepsiCo. In addition, set
forth below is information relating to certain transactions between
Bottling LLC and PBG ("PBG/Bottling LLC Transactions").
STOCK OWNERSHIP AND DIRECTOR RELATIONSHIPS WITH PEPSICO. PBG was initially
incorporated in January 1999 as a wholly owned subsidiary of PepsiCo to
effect the separation of most of PepsiCo's company-owned bottling
businesses. PBG became a publicly traded company on March 31, 1999. As of
January 22, 2005, PepsiCo's ownership represented 42.7% of the outstanding
Common Stock and 100% of the outstanding Class B Common Stock together
representing 47.9% of the voting power of all classes of PBG's voting
stock. PepsiCo also owns approximately 6.8% of the equity of Bottling
Group, LLC, PBG's principal operating subsidiary. In addition, Matthew M.
McKenna, a Managing Director of Bottling LLC, is an executive officer of
PepsiCo.
AGREEMENTS AND TRANSACTIONS WITH PEPSICO AND AFFILIATES. PBG and PepsiCo
(and certain of its affiliates) have entered into transactions and
agreements with one another, incident to their respective businesses, and
PBG and PepsiCo are expected to enter into material transactions and
agreements from time to time in the future. As used in this section, "PBG"
includes PBG and its subsidiaries.
Material agreements and transactions between PBG and PepsiCo (and certain
of its affiliates) during 2004 are described below.
Beverage Agreements and Purchases of Concentrates and Finished
Products. PBG purchases concentrates from PepsiCo and manufactures,
packages, distributes and sells carbonated and non-carbonated
beverages under license agreements with PepsiCo. These agreements
give PBG the right to manufacture, sell and distribute beverage
products of PepsiCo in both bottles and cans and fountain syrup in
specified territories. The agreements also provide PepsiCo with the
ability to set prices of such concentrates, as well as the terms of
payment and other terms and conditions under which PBG purchases
such concentrates. In addition, PBG bottles water under the Aquafina
trademark pursuant to an agreement with PepsiCo, which provides for
the payment of a royalty fee to PepsiCo. In certain instances, PBG
purchases finished beverage products from PepsiCo.
During 2004, total payments by PBG to PepsiCo for
concentrates, royalties and finished beverage products were
approximately $2.4 billion.
Purchase of Distribution Rights. During 2004, PBG paid PepsiCo
approximately $1 million for distribution rights relating to the
SoBe brand in certain PBG-owned territories in the United States and
Canada.
Transactions with Joint Ventures in which PepsiCo holds an
equity interest. PBG purchases tea
63
concentrate and finished beverage products from the Pepsi/Lipton Tea
Partnership, a joint venture of Pepsi-Cola North America, a division of
PepsiCo, and Lipton (the "Partnership"). During 2004, total amounts paid
or payable to PepsiCo for the benefit of the Partnership were
approximately $150 million.
PBG purchases finished beverage products from the North American
Coffee Partnership, a joint venture of Pepsi-Cola North America and
Starbucks. During 2004, amounts paid or payable to the North American
Coffee Partnership by PBG were approximately $185 million.
Under tax sharing arrangements we have with PepsiCo and PepsiCo
joint ventures, we received $10 million in tax related benefits in 2004.
Purchase of Snack Food Products from Frito-Lay, Inc. PBG purchases
snack food products from Frito-Lay, Inc., a subsidiary of PepsiCo, for
sale and distribution through Russia. In 2004, amounts paid or payable by
PBG to Frito-Lay, Inc. were approximately $75 million. Our agreement with
Frito-Lay expired in 2004, however we expect to renew the agreement and
continue our relationship with Frito-Lay.
Shared Services. PepsiCo provides various services to PBG pursuant
to a shared services agreement and other arrangements, including
information technology maintenance and the procurement of raw materials.
During 2004, amounts paid or payable to PepsiCo for these services totaled
approximately $68 million.
Pursuant to the shared services agreement and other arrangements,
PBG provides various services to PepsiCo, including employee benefit,
credit and collection, international tax and accounting services. During
2004, payments to PBG from PepsiCo for these services totaled
approximately $6 million.
Rental Payments. Amounts paid or payable by PepsiCo to PBG for
rental of office space at certain PBG facilities were approximately $4
million in 2004.
National Fountain Services. PBG provides certain manufacturing,
delivery and equipment maintenance services to PepsiCo's national fountain
customers. In 2004, net amounts paid or payable by PepsiCo to PBG for
these services were approximately $180 million.
Bottler Incentives. PepsiCo provides PBG with various forms of
marketing support. The level of this support is negotiated annually and
can be increased or decreased at the discretion of PepsiCo. These bottler
incentives are intended to cover a variety of programs and initiatives,
including direct marketplace support (including point-of-sale materials),
capital equipment funding and advertising support. For 2004, total bottler
incentives paid or payable to PBG or on behalf of PBG by PepsiCo
approximated $626 million.
PBG provides certain administrative support services to
PepsiAmericas, Inc. and Pepsi Bottling Ventures LLC. In 2004, amounts paid
or payable by PepsiAmericas, Inc. and Pepsi Bottling Ventures LLC to PBG
for these services were approximately $42,000.
PepsiCo Guarantees. The $1.3 billion of 5.63% senior notes issued on
February 9, 1999 and the $1.0 billion of 4.63% senior notes issued on
November 15, 2002, by us are guaranteed by PepsiCo in accordance with the
terms set forth in the related indentures.
PBG/Bottling LLC Transactions. PBG is considered a related party, as
we are the principal operating subsidiary of PBG and we make up
substantially all of the operations and assets of PBG. At December 25,
2004, PBG owned approximately 93.2% of our equity.
PBG provides insurance and risk management services to us pursuant
to a contractual agreement. Total premiums paid to PBG during 2004 were
$110 million.
We have loaned PBG $442 million during 2004 net of repayments.
During 2004, these loans
64
were made through a series of 1-year notes, with interest rates ranging
from 1.6% to 2.9%. Total intercompany loans owed to us from PBG at
December 25, 2004 were $1,948 million. The proceeds were used by PBG to
pay for interest, taxes, dividends, share repurchases and acquisitions.
Accrued interest receivable from PBG on these notes totaled $28 million at
December 25, 2004.
Total interest income recognized in our Consolidated Statements of
Operations relating to outstanding loans with PBG was $30 million in 2004.
On March 8, 1999, PBG issued $1 billion of 7% senior notes due 2029,
which are guaranteed by us.
PBG has a $500 million commercial paper program that is supported by
a credit facility, which is guaranteed by us and expires in April 2009.
There are certain financial covenants associated with this credit
facility. PBG has used this credit facility to support their commercial
paper program in 2004. At December 25, 2004, PBG has $78 million in
outstanding commercial paper with a weighted-average interest rate of
2.32%.
Bottling Group, LLC Distribution. We also guarantee that to the
extent there is available cash, we will distribute pro rata to PBG and
PepsiCo sufficient cash such that the aggregate cash distributed to PBG
will enable PBG to pay its taxes and make interest payments on the $1
billion 7% senior notes due 2029. During 2004, in accordance with our
Limited Liability Company Agreement we made cash distributions to PepsiCo
in the amount of $13 million and to PBG in the amount of $172 million. Any
amounts in excess of taxes and interest payments were used by PBG to repay
loans to us.
Relationships and Transactions with Management and Others. One of
our managing directors is an employee of PepsiCo and the other managing
directors and officers are employees of PBG. Linda G. Alvarado, a member
of PBG's Board of Directors, together with certain of her family members
own interests in YUM Brands franchise restaurant companies that purchase
beverage products from PBG. In 2004, the total amount of these purchases
was approximately $368,000.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
In addition to retaining KPMG LLP to audit Bottling LLC's consolidated
financial statements for 2005, Bottling LLC and its affiliates retained
KPMG LLP, as well as other accounting firms to provide various services in
2004, and expect to continue to do so in the future. The aggregate fees
billed for professional services by KPMG LLP in 2004 and 2003 were as
follows:
AUDIT FEES. The aggregate fees billed by KPMG LLP for professional
services rendered for the audit of Bottling LLC's consolidated financial
statements, audit of internal controls (2004 only), the reviews of its
interim financial statements included in Bottling LLC's Forms 10-Q and all
statutory audits were approximately $5.4 million for the fiscal year ended
December 25, 2004 and approximately $3.6 million for the fiscal year ended
December 27, 2003. The increase in fees for the fiscal year ended December
25, 2004, related to the audit of internal controls.
AUDIT-RELATED FEES. The aggregate fees billed by KPMG LLP for professional
services rendered primarily related to audits of employee benefit plans
and other audit related services were approximately $123,000 for the
fiscal year ended December 25, 2004. The aggregate fees billed by KPMG LLP
for professional services rendered primarily related to due diligence work
on acquisitions, accounting consultation for a proposed transaction,
employee benefit plans and other audit related services were approximately
$500,000 for the fiscal year ended December 27, 2003.
TAX FEES. The aggregate fees billed by KPMG LLP for professional services
rendered related primarily to assistance with tax compliance matters were
approximately $206,000 for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2004 and
approximately $150,000 for the fiscal year ended December 27, 2003.
ALL OTHER FEES. There were no fees billed by KPMG LLP for other services
rendered during each of the fiscal years ended December 25, 2004 and
December 27, 2003.
65
PRE-APPROVAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES. In 2003, PBG adopted a policy that
defines audit, audit-related, tax and other services to be provided to
PBG, including Bottling LLC, by PBG's independent auditors ("Auditor
Services") and requires such Auditor Services to be pre-approved by PBG's
Audit and Affiliated Transactions Committee. In accordance with PBG's
policy and applicable SEC rules and regulations, PBG's Audit Committee
adopted a policy in 2003 requiring pre-approval by the Committee or its
Chairperson of Auditor Services provided to PBG and its subsidiaries. If
Auditor Services are required prior to a regularly scheduled Audit
Committee meeting, the Committee Chairperson is authorized to approve such
services, provided that they are consistent with PBG's policy and that the
full Committee is advised of such services at the next regularly scheduled
Committee meeting.
66
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) 1. Financial Statements. The following consolidated financial
statements of Bottling LLC and its subsidiaries are included in Item 7:
Consolidated Statements of Operations - Fiscal years ended December 25, 2004,
December 27, 2003 and December 28, 2002.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Fiscal years ended December 25, 2004,
December 27, 2003 and December 28, 2002.
Consolidated Balance Sheets - December 25, 2004 and December 27, 2003.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Owners' Equity - Fiscal years ended
December 25, 2004, December 27, 2003 and December 28, 2002.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Independent Auditors' Report.
The financial statements of PBG, included in PBG's Annual Report on Form
10-K and filed with the SEC on February 28, 2005, are hereby incorporated by
reference as required by the SEC as a result of our guarantee of up to
$1,000,000,000 aggregate principal amount of PBG's 7% Senior Notes due in 2029.
2. Financial Statement Schedules. The following financial statement
schedules of Bottling LLC and its subsidiaries are included in this Report on
the page indicated:
Page
----
Independent Auditors' Report on Schedule and Consent.......................... F-2
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the fiscal years ended
December 25, 2004, December 27, 2003 and December 28, 2002 ..... F-3
3. Exhibits
See Index to Exhibits on pages E-1 - E-3.
67
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, Bottling Group, LLC has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: February 22, 2005
Bottling Group, LLC
By: /s/ John T. Cahill
------------------
John T. Cahill
Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of Bottling
Group, LLC and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
/s/ John T. Cahill Principal Executive Officer and February 22, 2005
- ------------------ Managing Director
John T. Cahill
/s/ Alfred H. Drewes Principal Financial Officer February 22, 2005
- --------------------
Alfred H. Drewes
/s/ Andrea L. Forster Principal Accounting Officer February 22, 2005
- ---------------------
Andrea L. Forster
/s/ Steven M. Rapp Managing Director February 22, 2005
- ------------------
Steven M. Rapp
/s/ Matthew M. McKenna Managing Director February 22, 2005
- ----------------------
Matthew M. McKenna
S-1
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
PAGE
----
Independent Auditors' Report on Schedule and Consent.......................... F-2
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the fiscal years
ended December 25, 2004 December 27, 2003 and December 28, 2002.............. F-3
F-1
Report and Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Owners of
Bottling Group, LLC:
The audits referred to in our report dated February 25, 2005 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Bottling Group, LLC and subsidiaries,
included the related financial statement schedule as of December 25, 2004, and
for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended December 25, 2004,
included in this Form 10-K. This financial statement schedule is the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on this financial statement schedule based on our audits. In our
opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the
basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all
material respects the information set forth therein.
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement No.
333-108225 on Form S-3 of Bottling Group, LLC of our report dated February 25,
2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Bottling Group, LLC as
of December 25, 2004 and December 27, 2003, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, cash flows and changes in owners' equity for each of
the fiscal years in the three-year period ended December 25, 2004, and our
report on the related financial statement schedule dated February 25, 2005
(which report appears above). Our report on the consolidated financial
statements refers to the adoption of Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 02-16,
"Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for Certain Consideration
Received from a Vendor," as of December 29, 2002.
/s/ KPMG LLP
New York, New York
February 25, 2005
F-2
SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
BOTTLING GROUP, LLC
IN MILLIONS
Balance At Charged to Accounts Foreign Balance At
Beginning Cost and Written Currency End Of
Of Period Expenses Acquisitions Off Translation Period
---------- ---------- ------------ -------- ----------- ----------
DESCRIPTION
FISCAL YEAR
ENDED
DECEMBER 25,
2004
Allowance
for losses
on trade
accounts
receivable .. $72 $(5) $-- $ (7) $1 $61
FISCAL YEAR
ENDED
DECEMBER 27,
2003
Allowance
for losses
on trade
accounts
receivable .. $67 $ 12 $-- $ (8) $1 $72
FISCAL YEAR
ENDED
DECEMBER 28,
2002
Allowance
for losses
on trade
accounts
receivable .. $42 $ 32 $14 $(22) $1 $67
F-3
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT
3.1 Articles of Formation of Bottling Group, LLC ("Bottling LLC") which
is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.4 to Bottling
LLC's Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No.
333-80361)
3.2 Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Bottling
LLC which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.5 to
Bottling LLC's Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No.
333-80361)
4.1 Indenture dated as of February 8, 1999 among Pepsi Bottling
Holdings, Inc., PepsiCo, Inc. and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as
trustee, relating to $1,000,000,000 5 3/8% Senior Notes due 2004 and
$1,300,000,000 5 5/8% Senior Notes due 2009, which is incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to PBG's Registration Statement
on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-70291).
4.2 First Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 8, 1999 among
Pepsi Bottling Holdings, Inc., Bottling Group, LLC, PepsiCo, Inc.
and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as trustee, supplementing the
Indenture dated as of February 8, 1999 among Pepsi Bottling
Holdings, Inc., PepsiCo, Inc. and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as
trustee, which is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10
to PBG's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No.
333-70291).
4.3 Indenture, dated as of March 8, 1999, by and among The Pepsi
Bottling Group, Inc. ("PBG"), as obligor, Bottling Group, LLC, as
guarantor, and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as trustee, relating to
$1,000,000,000 7% Series B Senior Notes due 2029, which is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to PBG's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-70291).
4.5 U.S. $250,000,000 364-Day Second Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2002 among PBG, Bottling Group, LLC,
JPMorgan Chase Bank, Citibank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Deutsche
Bank AG New York Branch and/or Cayman Islands Branch, Credit Suisse
First Boston, The Northern Trust Company, Lehman Commercial Paper
Inc., Royal Bank of Canada, Banco Bilbao Vizcaya, The Bank of New
York, Fleet National Bank, State Street Bank and Trust Company,
JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Agent, Banc of America Securities LLC and
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. as Co-Lead Arrangers and Joint Book
Managers and Bank of America, N.A. and Citibank, N.A., as
Co-Syndication Agents, which is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.6 to Bottling LLC's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 28, 2002.
4.6 U.S. $250,000,000 5-Year Credit Agreement, dated as of April 30,
2003 among The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc., Bottling Group, LLC,
Citibank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Credit Suisse First Boston,
Cayman Islands Branch, Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, JPMorgan
Chase Bank, The Northern Trust Company, Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB,
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, HSBC Bank USA, Fleet National Bank,
The Bank of New York, State Street Bank and Trust Company, Comerica
Bank, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Agent,
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Banc of America Securities LLC, as
Joint Lead Arrangers and Book Managers and Citibank, N.A., Bank of
America, N.A., Credit Suisse First Boston, and Deutsche Bank
Securities Inc. as Syndication Agents, which is incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Bottling LLC's registration statement
on Form S-4/A (Registration No. 333-102035).
E-1
4.7 U.S. $250,000,000 364-Day Credit Agreement, dated as of April 30,
2003 among The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc., Bottling Group, LLC,
Citibank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Credit Suisse First Boston,
Cayman Islands Branch, Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, JPMorgan
Chase Bank, The Northern Trust Company, Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB,
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, HSBC Bank USA, Fleet National Bank,
The Bank of New York, State Street Bank and Trust Company, Comerica
Bank, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Agent,
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Banc of America Securities LLC, as
Joint Lead Arrangers and Book Managers and Citibank, N.A., Bank of
America, N.A., Credit Suisse First Boston, and Deutsche Bank
Securities Inc. as Syndication Agents, which is incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to Bottling LLC's registration statement
on Form S-4/A (Registration No. 333-102035).
4.8 Indenture, dated as of November 15, 2002, among Bottling Group, LLC,
PepsiCo, Inc., as Guarantor, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Trustee,
relating to $1 Billion 4-5/8% Senior Notes due November 15, 2012,
which is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Bottling
LLC's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28,
2002.
4.9 Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 7, 2002 relating
to the $1 Billion 4-5/8% Senior Notes due November 15, 2012, which
is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to Bottling LLC's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2002.
4.10 Indenture, dated as of June 10, 2003 by and between Bottling Group,
LLC, as Obligor, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Trustee, relating to
$250,000,000 4-1/8% Senior Notes due June 15, 2015, which is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Bottling LLC's
registration statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-106285).
4.11 Registration Rights Agreement dated June 10, 2003 by and among
Bottling Group, LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., Lehman Brothers
Inc., Banc of America Securities LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc,
Credit Suisse First Boston LLC, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.,
Blaylock & Partners, L.P. and Fleet Securities, Inc, relating to
$250,000,000 4-1/8% Senior Notes due June 15, 2015, which is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Bottling LLC's
registration statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-106285).
4.12 Indenture, dated as of October 1, 2003, by and between Bottling
Group, LLC, as Obligor, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Trustee, which
is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Bottling LLC's
Form 8-K dated October 3, 2003.
4.13 Form of Note for the $500,000,000 2.45% Senior Notes due October 16,
2006, which is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to
Bottling LLC's Form 8-K dated October 3, 2003.
4.14 Form of Note for the $400,000,000 5.00% Senior Notes due November
15, 2013, which is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1
to Bottling LLC's Form 8-K dated November 13, 2003.
12* Statement re Computation of Ratios.
E-2
21* Subsidiaries of Bottling LLC.
23* Report and Consent of KPMG LLP.
31.1* Certification by the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2* Certification by the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1* Certification by the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2* Certification by the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
- ----------------------
* Filed herewith
E-3