DANIELSON HOLDING CORP - 10-K Annual Report

Back to GetFilings.com

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
---------------------

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003

OR

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ____________ TO ____________.

Commission file number 1-6732

---------------------

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

DELAWARE 95-6021257
(State or Other Jurisdiction (IRS Employer
of Incorporation or Organization) Identification No.)

TWO NORTH RIVERSIDE PLAZA, SUITE 600
CHICAGO, IL 60606
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

(312) 466-4030
(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy of information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of the Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [X] No [ ]

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity
held by nonaffiliates of the registrant computed by reference to the price at
which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked prices of
such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant's most
recently completed second fiscal quarter. $34,795,021

OUTSTANDING STOCK (ALL CLASSES)

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

i

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

INTRODUCTION

Danielson Holding Corporation ("DHC") is a holding company incorporated in
Delaware with substantially all of its current operations conducted in the
insurance services industry. DHC engages in insurance operations through its
indirect subsidiaries, National American Insurance Company of California and
related entities. DHC also has an equity interest in companies engaged in the
marine transportation and services industry through its investment in American
Commercial Lines, LLC ("ACL") and related entities.

In May 2002, DHC acquired a 100% ownership interest in ACL. On January 31,
2003, ACL and many of its subsidiaries and its immediate direct parent entity,
American Commercial Lines Holdings, LLC ("ACL Holdings"), filed a petition with
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court to reorganize under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code. Material uncertainty exists as to the impact of the bankruptcy on DHC's
equity interest in ACL upon the conclusion of ACL's bankruptcy proceeding. While
it cannot presently be determined, DHC's investment in ACL may have little or no
value upon the completion of that bankruptcy proceeding. DHC, NAICC and DHC's
equity investees, operating in the marine services industries, are not
guarantors of ACL's debt, nor are they liable for any of ACL's liabilities.

DHC owns a direct 5.4% interest in Global Materials Services, LLC ("GMS")
and a direct 50% interest in Vessel Leasing, LLC ("Vessel Leasing"). ACL owns
50% of GMS and the remaining 50% of Vessel Leasing. Neither of these two
companies filed for Chapter 11 protection. GMS is an owner and operator of
marine terminals and warehouse operations, and Vessel Leasing leases barges to
ACL's barge transportation operations, which are in Chapter 11. DHC, GMS and
Vessel Leasing are not guarantors of ACL's debt nor are they liable for any of
ACL's liabilities.

As a result of the bankruptcy filing, while DHC continues to exercise
influence over the operating and financial policies of ACL, it no longer
maintains control of ACL. Accordingly, for the year ended December 31, 2003, DHC
has accounted for its investments in ACL, GMS and Vessel Leasing using the
equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, DHC reports
its share of the equity investees' income or loss based on its ownership
interest.

In conjunction with the uncertainty of the outcome of the ACL bankruptcy,
DHC evaluated the carrying values of its investments in ACL, GMS and Vessel
Leasing and recorded an impairment loss of $8.2 million for its remaining
original investment in ACL during the quarter ended March 28, 2003. No
impairment loss adjustments have been made to the carrying values of GMS and
Vessel Leasing.

DHC had cash and investments, including investments in subsidiaries and
restricted cash, at the holding company level of $62.8 million at December 31,
2003. DHC's cash amounted to $3.5 million, DHC's investments consisted of
publicly traded bonds of $0.5 million. DHC has restricted cash of $37.0 million
related to the Covanta escrow. DHC also had a $17.3 million investment in
insurance subsidiaries. DHC had liabilities at the holding company level of
$42.2 million, consisting primarily of a note payable of $40 million relating to
the acquisition of the energy and water business of Covanta Energy Corporation
("Covanta") discussed below.

DHC expects to report, as of the end of 2003, aggregate consolidated net
operating loss tax carryforwards for federal income tax purposes ("NOLs") of
approximately $652 million. These losses will expire over the course of the next
19 years unless utilized prior thereto. See Note 13 of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements (hereinafter referred to as "Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements") for more detailed information on DHC's NOLs.

DHC's strategy is to grow by developing business partnerships and making
strategic acquisitions. As part of DHC's ongoing corporate strategy, DHC has
continued to seek acquisition opportunities, such as the recent acquisition of
Covanta described below which management believes will enable DHC to earn an
attractive

1

return on its investment. Such acquisitions will not necessarily complement its
existing operations, and could be entirely unrelated to DHC's current
businesses.

ACQUISITION OF COVANTA ENERGY CORPORATION

On December 2, 2003, DHC executed a definitive investment and purchase
agreement to acquire the energy and water businesses of Covanta in connection
with Covanta's emergence from Chapter 11 proceedings in bankruptcy. The primary
components of the transaction are: (1) the purchase by DHC of 100% of the equity
of Covanta in consideration for a cash purchase price of $30 million, and (2)
agreement as to new letter of credit and revolving of credit facilities for
Covanta's domestic and international operations, provided by some of the
existing Covanta lenders and a group of additional lenders organized by DHC. DHC
amended this Agreement with Covanta as of February 23, 2004 to reduce the
purchase price and release from an escrow account $175,000 so that a limited
liability company formed by DHC and one of its subsidiaries could acquire an
equity interest in Covanta Lake, Inc., a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of
Covanta, in a transaction separate and distinct from the acquisition of Covanta
out of bankruptcy.

As required by the investment and purchase agreement, Covanta filed a new,
alternative proposed plan of reorganization, a new, alternative proposed plan of
liquidation for specified non-core businesses, and an accompanying draft
disclosure statement, each reflecting the transactions contemplated under the
investment and purchase agreement, with the Bankruptcy Court. On March 5, 2004,
the Bankruptcy Court confirmed the proposed plans.

Under the terms of the investment and purchase agreement on March 10, 2004,
DHC acquired 100% of Covanta's equity in consideration for approximately $30
million (net of $175,000 discussed above). As part of the investment and
purchase agreement, DHC arranged for a new $118 million replacement letter of
credit facility for Covanta, secured by a second lien on Covanta's domestic
assets. This financing was provided by SZ Investments, L.L.C., a DHC shareholder
("SZ Investments"), Third Avenue Trust, on behalf of Third Avenue Value Fund
Series, a DHC shareholder ("Third Avenue") and D. E. Shaw Laminar Portfolios,
L.L.C., a creditor of Covanta and a DHC shareholder ("Laminar"). In addition, in
connection with a note purchase agreement described below, Laminar arranged for
a $10 million revolving loan facility for Covanta's international operations
that DHC acquired, secured by Covanta's international assets.

A preliminary estimate of the purchase price to be recognized by DHC in its
financial statements ranges from $46 million to $51 million which includes the
cash purchase price of $30 million, an expense estimate of approximately $6
million for professional fees and other costs incurred in connection with the
acquisition, and an estimated fair value ranging from $10 million to $15 million
for DHC's commitment to sell up to 3 million shares of its Common Stock at $1.53
per share to certain creditors of Covanta, subject to certain limitations. The
final purchase cost will be determined as DHC obtains additional information.

FINANCING THE COVANTA ACQUISITION

DHC obtained the financing necessary for the Covanta acquisition pursuant
to a note purchase agreement dated December 2, 2003, from SZ Investments, Third
Avenue and Laminar (collectively, the "Bridge Lenders"). Pursuant to the note
purchase agreement, the Bridge Lenders provided DHC with $40 million of bridge
financing in exchange for notes issued by DHC. In the event that DHC is unable
to repay all or a portion of the notes pursuant to a previously announced rights
offering of DHC Common Stock, par value $0.10 per share ("Common Stock"), then
the notes are convertible without action by the Bridge Lenders into shares of
Common Stock at a price of $1.53 per share subject to certain agreed upon
limitations necessitated by DHC's NOLs. These notes have a scheduled maturity
date of January 2, 2005 and an extended maturity date of July 15, 2005, and bear
interest at a rate of 12% per annum through July 15, 2004 and 16% per annum
thereafter. In the event of a default or the failure to pay a note on its
maturity, the interest rate under the note increases by 2%. DHC used $30 million
of the proceeds from the notes to post an escrow deposit prior to the closing of
the transactions contemplated by the investment and purchase agreement. At
closing, the purchase price deposit (net of the $175,000 discussed above) was
used as DHC's purchase price for Covanta's equity interests. DHC has been and
will use the remainder of the proceeds to pay transaction expenses and for

2

general corporate purposes. In consideration for the $40 million of bridge
financing and the agreement by the Bridge Lenders to arrange or provide for the
$118 million second lien credit facility and for Laminar to arrange or provide
for the $10 million international revolving credit facility, DHC issued to the
Bridge Lenders an aggregate of 5,120,853 shares of Common Stock. Upon closing of
the Covanta acquisition, certain contractual restrictions upon such shares
terminated. At the time that DHC entered into the note purchase agreement,
agreed to issue the notes convertible into shares of Common Stock and issued the
equity compensation to the Bridge Lenders, the closing price of the Common Stock
on the American Stock Exchange on the day prior to the announcement of the
Covanta acquisition was $1.40 per share, which was below the $1.53 per share
conversion price of the notes.

In addition, under the note purchase agreement Laminar has agreed to
convert an amount of notes to acquire up to an additional 8.75 million shares of
the Common Stock at $1.53 per share based upon the levels of public
participation in the rights offering. Further, DHC has agreed, in connection
with the note purchase agreement, to sell up to an additional 3 million shares
of Common Stock at $1.53 per share to certain creditors of Covanta based upon
the levels of public participation in the rights offering and subject to change
of ownership and other limitations.

As part of DHC's negotiations with Laminar and their becoming a 5%
shareholder, pursuant to a letter agreement dated December 2, 2003, Laminar has
agreed to restrictions on the transferability of the shares of Common Stock that
Laminar holds or will acquire. Further in accordance with the transfer
restrictions contained in Article Five of DHC's charter restricting the resale
of Common Stock by 5% stockholders, DHC has agreed with Laminar to provide it
with limited rights to resell the Common Stock that it holds. Finally, DHC has
agreed with the Bridge Lenders to file a registration statement with the SEC to
register the shares of Common Stock issued to them under the note purchase
agreement not later than the earlier of June 30, 2004 and ten days after closing
of the rights offering. Samuel Zell, Chairman of the Board of Directors and
Chief Executive Officer of DHC, Philip G. Tinkler, Chief Financial Officer of
DHC and William Pate, a director of DHC, are affiliated with SZ Investments.
Martin Whitman and David Barse, directors of DHC, are affiliated with Third
Avenue. The note purchase agreement and other transactions involving the Bridge
Lenders were negotiated, reviewed and approved by a special committee of the DHC
Board of Directors composed solely of disinterested directors and advised by
independent legal and financial advisors.

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESSES

Set forth below is a description of DHC's business operations as of
December 31, 2003, as presented in the Consolidated Financial Statements
included in this report. As of December 31, 2003, DHC was engaged in two primary
businesses: the holding company business and the Insurance Services business.
The holding company business and the Insurance Services business each have one
business segment. Each of these businesses and business segments are described
below.

Additional information about DHC's business segments is included in Item 7,
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and Note 21 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

THE HOLDING COMPANY BUSINESS

Nature of Holding Company Operations

DHC is a holding company whose principal operations consist of subsidiaries
in the insurance industry in the western United States, primarily California.
DHC also has equity interests in companies engaged in the marine transportation
and services industry.

DHC holds all of the voting stock of Danielson Indemnity Company ("DIND").
DIND owns 100 percent of the common stock of NAICC, DHC's principal operating
insurance subsidiary, which owns 100 percent of the common stock of Valor
Insurance Company, Incorporated a Montana domiciled specialty insurance company
("Valor"), Danielson Insurance Company and Danielson National Insurance Company
(DIND, National American Insurance Company of California and its subsidiaries
being collectively referred to hereinafter as "NAICC").

3

Tax Loss Carryforward

At the close of 2003, DHC had consolidated NOLs of approximately $652
million for federal income tax purposes. This estimate was based upon federal
consolidated income tax losses for the periods through December 31, 2002 and an
estimate of the 2003 taxable results. Some or all of the carryforward may be
available to offset, for federal income tax purposes, the future taxable income,
if any, of DHC, its wholly owned subsidiaries and the Mission trusts described
in more detail in Note 13 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The
Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") has not audited any of DHC's tax returns for
any of the years during the carryforward period including those returns for the
years in which the losses giving rise to the NOL carryforward were reported. The
NOLs are currently fully reserved, for valuation purposes, on DHC's Consolidated
Financial Statements.

DHC's NOLs will expire, if not used, in the following approximate amounts
in the following years (dollars in thousands):

DHC's ability to utilize its NOLs would be substantially reduced if DHC
were to undergo an "ownership change" within the meaning of Section 382(g)(1) of
the Internal Revenue Code. DHC will be treated as having had an "ownership
change" if there is more than a 50% increase in stock ownership during a three
year "testing period" by "5% stockholders". In an effort to reduce the risk of
an ownership change, DHC has imposed restrictions on the ability of holders of
five percent or more of the Common Stock, as well as the ability of others to
become five percent stockholders as a result of transfers of Common Stock. The
transfer restrictions were implemented in 1990, and DHC expects that they will
remain in force as long as the NOLs are available to DHC. Notwithstanding such
transfer restrictions, there could be circumstances under which an issuance by
DHC of a significant number of new shares of Common Stock or other new class of
equity security having certain characteristics (for example, the right to vote
or convert into Common Stock) might result in an ownership change under the
Internal Revenue Code.

THE INSURANCE SERVICES BUSINESS

Nature of Insurance Operations

NAICC manages its business across four principal lines of business; (1)
private passenger automobile; (2) commercial automobile; (3) workers'
compensation; and (4) property and casualty. As of December 31, 2003, NAICC was
engaged in writing exclusively non-standard private passenger automobile
primarily in California. Insurers admitted in California are required to obtain
approval from the California Department of Insurance of rates and/or forms prior
to being used. Many of the other states, in which NAICC does business,

4

have similar requirements. Rates and policy forms are developed by NAICC and
filed with the regulators in each of the relevant states, depending upon each
state's requirements. NAICC relies upon its own as well as industry experience
in establishing rates.

Private Passenger Automobile

NAICC began writing non-standard private passenger automobile insurance in
California in July 1993, in Idaho, Oregon and Washington in April 1998, and in
Arizona and Nevada in 1999. Policyholder selection is governed by underwriting
guidelines established by NAICC. Non-standard risks are those segments of the
driving public which generally are not considered "preferred" business, such as
drivers with a record of prior accidents or driving violations, drivers involved
in particular occupations or driving certain types of vehicles, or those who
have been non-renewed or declined by another insurance company. Generally,
non-standard premium rates are higher than standard premium rates and policy
limits are lower than typical policy limits. Management believes that it is able
to achieve underwriting success through refinement of various risk profiles,
thereby dividing the non-standard market into more defined segments which can be
adequately priced. Additionally, traditional lower limits lend themselves to
quicker claims processing allowing management to respond more quickly to
changing loss trends and revise underlying underwriting and rate filings.

Net written premiums were $18.1 million, $25.4 million, and $19.4 million
in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively, for the non-standard private passenger
automobile program. Net written premiums for non-standard private passenger
automobile in California were $18.0 million, $25.2 million and $11.9 million for
2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The primary reason for the decrease in
private passenger automobile premiums in 2003 is the result of underwriting
restrictions placed on the California non-standard automobile program in
February 2002.

Private passenger automobile policy limits vary by state. In California and
Arizona, non-standard policies primarily provide maximum coverage up to $15,000
per person, $30,000 per accident for liability and bodily injury and $10,000 per
accident for property damage. In Oregon, and Washington, non-standard policies
provide minimum coverage of $25,000 per person, $50,000 per accident for
liability and bodily injury and $10,000 per accident for property damage, and
can provide coverage to a maximum of $250,000 per person, $500,000 per accident
for liability and bodily injury and $25,000 per accident for property damage. In
general, preferred policies provide coverage to a maximum of $250,000 per
person, $500,000 per accident for liability and bodily injury and $25,000 per
accident for property damage.

In 2001, NAICC ceded 10 percent of its California non-standard private
passenger automobile business to a major reinsurance company under a quota share
reinsurance agreement. Effective January 1, 2002, the treaty was not renewed.
NAICC's Oregon and Washington non-standard automobile, California preferred
automobile business, and its commercial automobile business is reinsured on an
excess of loss basis, where the company retains the first $250,000 of insured
losses. Although the non-California business was placed in run-off in 2002 the
non-standard California business had increased due to the fact that
approximately half the carriers exited the state in 2001 providing NAICC greater
market share but at the expense of underwriting results. As policies have been
renewed they have been renewed at significantly higher rates.

NAICC does not write any business through managing general agents. Its
California non-standard private passenger automobile, representing 59.1% of 2003
net written premiums, was produced through one general agent as compared to
40.6% in 2002 for the same general agent. In 1998, NAICC commenced writing
preferred risks in California through a different general agent and has since
placed that segment in run-off. Arizona, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington business
was written directly through appointed independent agents.

Commercial Automobile

NAICC began writing non-standard commercial automobile insurance in 1995
through independent agents. The majority of automobiles owned or used by
businesses are insured under policies that provide other coverage for the
business, such as commercial multi-peril insurance. Businesses which are unable
to insure a specific driver and businesses having vehicles not qualifying for
commercial multi-peril insurance are typical NAICC commercial automobile
policyholders. Examples of these risks include drivers with more than one

5

moving violation, one and two vehicle accounts, and specialty haulers, such as
sand and gravel, farm vehicles and certain short haul common carriers. The
typical NAICC commercial automobile policy covers fleets of four or fewer
vehicles. NAICC does not insure interstate trucking, trucks hauling logs,
gasoline or similar higher hazard operations. The current average annual premium
of the policies in force is approximately $4,865.

Net written premiums for commercial automobile insurance were $11.9
million, $19.5 million and $38.4 million in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
The decrease in commercial automobile premiums in 2003 was attributable to
NAICC's decision to exit this line of business. The decision to exit the market
was primarily driven by the unprofitable historical underwriting results and
relatively high net retentions for this line of business. No new commercial
automobile policies were issued after July 2003 and no policies were renewed
after September 2003. The decrease in commercial automobile premiums during 2002
was attributable to management's decision in September 2001 to curtail marketing
efforts in this line of business.

The maximum non-standard commercial automobile policy limit provided by
NAICC is $1 million for bodily injury and property damage combined as a single
limit of liability for each occurrence. NAICC retains the first $250,000 of
bodily injury and property damage combined as a single limit of liability for
each occurrence.

Workers' Compensation

NAICC began writing workers' compensation insurance in 1987. Through
January 2002, NAICC and its subsidiary Valor wrote workers' compensation
insurance primarily in California and Montana. NAICC previously wrote workers'
compensation insurance in California and four other western states. Workers'
compensation insurance policies provide coverage for statutory benefits which
employers are required to pay to employees who are injured in the course of
employment including, among other things, temporary or permanent disability
benefits, death benefits, medical and hospital expenses and expenses for
vocational rehabilitation. Policies were issued having a term of no more than
one year. In response to 2001 market developments affecting California workers'
compensation, including worsening loss experience, NAICC decided to exit the
workers' compensation line of business. The last California workers'
compensation policy was issued in July 2001 and the last policy issued outside
of California was issued in January 2002. Net written premiums for workers'
compensation were $0.3 million, $7.6 million and $21.7 million in 2003, 2002 and
2001, respectively. The decrease in 2003 and 2002 reflects the decision to exit
the workers' compensation line as discussed above. Net written premiums for
Valor workers' compensation were $0.3 million, $6.6 million and $11.1 million in
2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Valor began non-renewing all policies in
December 2001 and was placed into run-off effective January 2002.

NAICC retains the first $200,000 of each workers' compensation loss and has
purchased reinsurance for up to $49.8 million in excess of its retention, the
first $9.5 million of which has been placed with three major reinsurance
companies with the remaining $40.3 million provided by 16 other companies. In
April 2000, NAICC entered into a workers' compensation excess of loss
reinsurance agreement with SCOR Re Insurance Company that provided coverage
commencing at losses of $200,000. In May 2001, NAICC entered into a workers'
compensation excess of loss reinsurance agreement with PMA Re Insurance Company
that provided 50% coverage commencing at losses of $200,000.

Property and Casualty

As of December 31, 1985, NAICC through a series of assumption agreements
assumed the assets and liabilities of the Stuyvesant Insurance Company
("Stuyvesant") for policies issued prior to 1978, along with then other
affiliated H.F. Ahmanson insurance subsidiaries (collectively referred as "H.F.
Ahmanson"). NAICC was subsequently acquired by KCP Holding Company ("KCP") on
September 19, 1986. On July 29, 1988, Mission American Insurance Company
("MAIC") pursuant to an assumption agreement transferred all of its assets and
liabilities (accident years 1985 through 1988) to NAICC in exchange for 62.76%
of KCP's total common stock. MAIC was part of the Mission Insurance Group, Inc.,
which subsequently emerged from bankruptcy on August 16, 1990 as DHC. On
December 31, 1991, DHC acquired the remaining outstanding

6

shares of KCP not then indirectly owned by DHC by MAIC. NAICC for the years 1987
to 1995 wrote a commercial multi peril program for artisan contractors, and
separately, a homeowners program from 1998 to 2001 by the same general agent
that wrote the companies California preferred automobile program. NAICC
continues to discharge claims arising under its own insurance policies and
contracts and those issued by MAIC, Stuyvesant and other H.F. Ahmanson former
insurance subsidiaries.

The property and casualty claims are categorized into the following: (1)
direct excess and primary policies; (2) workers' compensation; (3) reinsurance
assumed on an excess of loss basis; and (4) reinsurance assumed on pool business
primarily from the London marketplace. Nearly all remaining claims on policies,
issued by companies other than by NAICC, are of an asbestos and environmental
("A&E") nature. As of December 31, 2003, there remained 50 direct excess and
primary claims, of which 15 were related to policies issued by Stuyvesant, 10 by
H.F. Ahmanson entities, 12 by MAIC and 13 by NAICC. These claims generally have
policy limits up to $1,000,000, with reinsurance generally above $50,000. The
NAICC issued policies are approaching the 10-year statute of limitations baring
future claims accepted. As of December 31, 2003, there were 55 open workers'
compensation claims, the majority of which were issued by MAIC with no
reinsurance coverage. The assumed reinsurance contracts have relatively low
participation, generally less than $25,000, and estimates of unpaid losses have
been based on information provided by the primary insurance companies. At
December 31, 2003, there were 387 open claims related to excess of loss assumed
reinsurance. As of December 31, 2003 and 2002, NAICC's net unpaid losses and
loss of adjustment expenses relating to A&E claims were approximately $8.3
million and $7.3 million, respectively. In the most current three years of
development there has been an influx of newly reported A&E cases on an excess of
loss basis related to the Stuyvesant issued policies that are beginning to
pierce the limits in which NAICC participates. New cases reported in 2003, 2002
and 2001 on the assumed excess of loss of business increased 19%, 15% and 7%,
respectively; however, the incurred losses, related to assumed excess of loss of
business was less than $0.3 million for the last three years. Approximately 40%
of the aggregate assumed pool business has been reinsured, all with AM Best
rated A or better carriers. Management has been successful in commuting with
several cedants and pools with respect to the assumed liabilities and continues
to look for such opportunities in the future.

Marketing

NAICC currently markets its non-standard private passenger automobile
insurance in California only by using one general agent that uses over 600
sub-agents to obtain applications for policies. The general agent processed
16,002, 43,013 and 31,796 applications in 2003, 2002 and 2001, binding 96.1%,
96.3% and 96.5% to policies, respectively. NAICC previously wrote non-standard
private passenger automobile insurance directly through 128 appointed
independent agents in Arizona, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon and Washington. During 2001
it was decided to cease writing new policies for non-standard private passenger
automobile outside of California. The number of appointed independent agents was
reduced accordingly. NAICC, which began a preferred private passenger automobile
program in California in February 1998, marketed through a second general agent,
but discontinued that program in 2001. However, certain renewals on this program
were continued into 2003 by statutory requirement. Although the California
Automobile Assigned Risk Plan provides for state mandated minimum levels of
automobile liability coverage to be provided by insurance companies on an
allocation basis to drivers whose driving records, or other relevant
characteristics, make it difficult for them to obtain insurance coverage in the
voluntary market, NAICC does not expect to receive a material number of
assignments arising from this program. Consequently, NAICC does not believe that
the assignments will have a material adverse effect on its profitability.

As a result of the decision to end the commercial automobile program, NAICC
closed its remaining sales offices in September 2003. NAICC had maintained sales
offices located in Long Beach, California, Phoenix, Arizona and Napa,
California, with each office employing a single marketing representative. In
2001, based on the decision to exit other lines of business, NAICC closed its
Fresno, California and Portland, Oregon offices and reduced its marketing
personnel in both the Long Beach and Napa, California offices. All remaining
functions of policyholder service, renewal underwriting, policy issuance,
premium collection and record retention are performed centrally at NAICC's home
office in Long Beach, California. During 2001, NAICC

7

marketed its non-standard commercial automobile insurance through approximately
700 independent agents located in Arizona, California, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon,
Utah and Washington. At the end of 2003, NAICC reduced its appointed agents to
approximately 30 compared to 180 at the end of 2002.

Prior to 2002, NAICC wrote workers' compensation business primarily in the
states of California, Oregon, Arizona, Idaho and Montana through more than 800
independent agents. In July 2001, NAICC ceased writing policies in California,
Arizona, and Nevada. NAICC stopped writing Oregon and Idaho polices in December
2001. Valor marketed workers' compensation insurance to Montana employers. All
business was produced and serviced through its home office in Billings, Montana.
Valor wrote workers' compensation for employers of a wide range of hazard
classifications, from banks to construction businesses, and targeted the larger
employers in the state of Montana. Valor began non-renewing its policies in
December 2001 and the company was placed into run-off effective January 2002.

Claims

All automobile claims are handled by employees of NAICC at its home office
in Long Beach, California. Claims are reported by agents, insureds and claimants
directly to NAICC. Claims involving suspected fraud are referred to an in-house
special investigation unit ("SIU") which manages a detailed investigation of
these claims using outside investigative firms. When evidence of fraudulent
activity is identified, the SIU works with the various state departments of
insurance, the National Insurance Crime Bureau and local law enforcement
agencies in handling the claims.

Workers' compensation claims are received, reviewed, and processed by NAICC
employees located in claims service offices in Long Beach. In 2002, all of
Valor's pending claims were transferred to four third party administrators
("TPA"), and in March 2003, all claims were consolidated to one TPA. Most of
NAICC's policyholders are not of sufficient size or type to make a specialized
managed care approach to medical cost containment more cost effective. Due to
the small number of remaining workers' compensation claims, claims involving
suspected fraud are referred to a third party adjuster specializing in such
cases.

Property and casualty claims are also received, reviewed, and processed by
NAICC employees located in Long Beach. Additionally, DHC uses external
consultants and attorneys to aid in determining the extent, obligation and
accuracy of claims originating from Stuyvesant policies issued prior to 1978.

Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses

NAICC's net unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses ("LAE") represent
the estimated indemnity cost and loss adjustment expenses necessary to cover the
ultimate net cost of investigating and settling claims.

Such estimates are based upon estimates for reported losses, historical
company experience of losses reported by reinsured companies for insurance
assumed, and actuarial estimates based upon historical company and industry
experience for development of reported and unreported claims (incurred but not
reported). Any changes in estimates of ultimate liability are reflected in
current operating results. Inflation is assumed, along with other factors, in
estimating future claim costs and related liabilities. NAICC does not discount
any of its loss reserves.

The California legislature in response to rising workers' compensation
costs and a lack of available market, passed Assembly Bill No. 227 ("AB 227")
and Senate Bill No. 228 ("SB 228") on September 12, 2003, both of which were
signed by the Governor. Both bills contain many reforms designed to reduce the
cost of workers' compensation claims. Several of the provisions apply to medical
services provided after the effective date of January 1, 2004, including
services on injuries that occurred prior to the effective date. As a result, the
reforms are expected to have a retroactive impact and therefore affect
pre-established reserve levels. The six major provisions that could have a
retroactive impact on NAICC's reserves are:

- Changes to the Official Medical Fee Schedule Values for Physician
Services

- Changes to the Official Medical Fee Schedule for Inpatient Services

- Pharmaceutical Fee Schedule

8

- Outpatient Surgery Center Fee Schedule

- Repeal of the Primary Treating Physician Presumption for Pre-2003
Injuries

- Other Medical Treatment Utilization

The California Workers' Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau ("WCIRB") has
attempted to estimate the potential savings on pre-2004 injuries due to AB 227
and SB 228. NAICC with the assistance of external actuarial services applied the
WCIRB projections along with NAICC specific-data to calculate potential gross
savings on medical reserves of $2.0 million, of which the outpatient fee
schedule and repeal of the treating physician presumptions had the largest
impact. The effect of these bills in the long-term is somewhat uncertain due to
the unknown effects it will have on all parties behaviors that contribute to the
cost of the system. Additionally, new legislation, litigation and judicial
interpretation may be introduced that could weaken the effect of AB 227 and SB
228. Based upon the aforementioned actuarial projection, NAICC reduced its
estimate of ultimate liabilities on worker' compensation claims by approximately
$1.0 million as of December 31, 2003 or approximately 13.5% of its California
medical net loss and allocated LAE ("ALAE") reserves.

The ultimate cost of claims is difficult to predict for several reasons.
Claims may not be reported until many years after they are incurred. Changes in
the rate of inflation and uncertainty in the legal environment may also create
forecasting complications. Court decisions may dramatically increase liability
in the time between the dates on which a claim is reported and its resolution.
For example, punitive damages awards have grown in frequency and magnitude.
Courts have imposed increasing obligations on insurance companies to defend
policyholders. As a result, the frequency and severity of claims have grown
rapidly and unpredictably.

The unpaid loss and LAE, related to environmental cleanup, has been
established considering facts then currently known and the then current state of
the law and coverage litigation. Liabilities are estimated for known claims
(including the cost of related litigation) when sufficient information has been
developed to indicate the involvement of a specific contract of insurance or
reinsurance and management can reasonably estimate its liability. Estimates for
unknown claims and development on reported claims are included in NAICC's unpaid
loss and LAE. The liability for development of reported claims has been based on
the estimates of the range of potential losses for reported claims in the
aggregate. Estimates of liabilities are reviewed and updated continually and
there is the potential that NAICC's ultimate liabilities could be materially in
excess of amounts that are currently recorded.

Management believes that the provisions for unpaid losses and LAE are
adequate to cover the net cost of losses and loss expenses incurred to date;
however, such liability is necessarily based on estimates and there can be no
assurance that the ultimate liability will not exceed such estimates.

9

The following table provides a reconciliation of NAICC's unpaid losses and
LAE (in thousands):

The net losses and LAE incurred during 2003 related to prior years and were
attributable to recognition of unfavorable development in the following:
commercial automobile of $5.5 million for accident years 2000 through 2002;
workers' compensation of $5.5 million of which $3.9 million was attributable to
Valor; and property and casualty of $1.5 million, most of which was attributable
to unallocated LAE reserves. All of the commercial automobile programs were
placed in run-off during 2003. The net losses and LAE incurred during 2002
related to prior years and were attributable to adverse development on both the
California workers' compensation line totaling $3.5 million, certain private
passenger automobile programs totaling $4.7 million, and commercial automobile
totaling $2.0 million. The losses and LAE incurred during 2001 related to prior
years and were attributable to adverse development on both the California
workers' compensation line totaling $4.4 million and certain private passenger
automobile programs, primarily outside of California, totaling $1.7 million. All
of the workers' compensation lines and the private passenger automobile programs
that caused higher than expected losses were placed in run-off during 2001.

10

The following table indicates the manner in which unpaid losses and LAE at
the end of a particular year change as time passes. The first line reflects the
liability as originally reported, net of reinsurance, at the end of the stated
year. Each calendar year-end liability includes the estimated liability for that
accident year and all prior accident years comprising that liability. The second
section shows the original recorded net liability as of the end of successive
years adjusted to reflect facts and circumstance that are later discovered. The
next line, cumulative (deficiency) or redundancy, compares the adjusted net
liability amount to the net liability amount as originally established and
reflects whether the net liability as originally recorded was adequate to cover
the estimated cost of claims or redundant. The third section reflects the
cumulative amounts related to that liability that was paid, net of reinsurance,
as of the end of successive years.

Analysis of Net Losses and LAE Development (dollars in thousands):

11

See previous table and narrative regarding adverse development by line
recorded in 2003, 2002 and 2001 with respect to accident years 2000 to 2002, as
well as other accident years affected. The three-year adverse development for
the years ended 1996 through 1999 was related to both commercial auto and
workers' compensation. The commercial auto was most significantly impacted by
case strengthening related to a change in claims administration, coupled with
the recognition that development factors of prior years were not as indicative
of the business written for those respective years due to changes in risk
profile and limits. Workers' compensation was most effected by changes in
legislation that occurred in 1995 that took several years to develop, with such
development being different than the experience prior to 1995.

The three-year development for years ended 1993 through 1995 was due in
part to the strengthening of the unpaid losses and LAE of property and casualty
businesses assumed by NAICC in 1985 and workers' compensation written prior to
1991. NAICC recognized additional unpaid losses and LAE incurred with respect to
the property and casualty business of nearly $1.0 million for the three-year
development period. NAICC has continued to post additional incurred but not
reported losses ("IBNR") despite negotiations on several commutations of assumed
excess of loss reinsurance contracts that indicated previous estimates of IBNR.

Conditions and trends that have affected the development of these
liabilities in the past may not necessarily recur in the future especially
considering that those ongoing lines that have experienced the greatest adverse
development have been placed in run-off in 2001 and 2003. Reliance on this
cumulative history may not be indicative of future performance.

Reinsurance

In its normal course of business, NAICC reinsures a portion of its exposure
with other insurance companies so as to effectively limit its maximum loss
arising out of any one occurrence. Contracts of reinsurance do not legally
discharge the original insurer from its primary liability. Estimated reinsurance
receivables arising from these contracts of reinsurance are, in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, reported
separately as assets.

As of December 31, 2003 General Reinsurance Corporation ("GenRe") was the
only reinsurer that comprised more than 10% of NAICC's reinsurance recoverable
on paid and unpaid balances. NAICC monitors all reinsurers, by reviewing A.M.
Best reports and ratings, information obtained from reinsurance intermediaries
and analyzing financial statements. At December 31, 2003 NAICC had reinsurance
recoverable on paid and unpaid balances from GenRe of $13.1 million. GenRe has
an A.M. Best rating of A++. See Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements for further information on reinsurance.

NAICC and two of its subsidiaries participate in an inter-company pooling
and reinsurance agreement. Under this agreement Danielson Insurance Company
("DICO") and Danielson National Insurance Company ("DNIC") cede 100% of their
net liability, defined to include premiums, losses and allocated LAE, to NAICC
to be combined with the net liability for policies of NAICC in formation of the
"Pool". NAICC simultaneously cedes to DICO and DNIC 10% of the net liability of
the Pool. DNIC commenced participation in July 1993 and DICO commenced in
January 1994. Additionally, both DICO and DNIC reimburse NAICC for executive
services, professional services, and administrative expenses based on designated
percentages of net written premiums for each line of business.

GOVERNMENT REGULATION

DHC's Insurance Services business is highly regulated as discussed below.

REGULATION OF INSURANCE SERVICES BUSINESS

Insurance companies are subject to insurance laws and regulations
established by the states in which they transact business. The agencies
established pursuant to these state laws have broad administrative and
supervisory powers relating to the granting and revocation of licenses to
transact business, regulation of trade practices, establishment of guaranty
associations, licensing of agents, approval of policy forms, premium rate

12

filing requirements, reserve requirements, the form and content of required
regulatory financial statements, capital and surplus requirements and the
maximum concentrations of certain classes of investments. Most states also have
enacted legislation regulating insurance holding company systems, including
acquisitions, extraordinary dividends, the terms of affiliate transactions and
other related matters. DHC and its insurance subsidiaries have registered as
holding company systems pursuant to such legislation in California and Montana,
and routinely report to other jurisdictions. The National Association of
Insurance Commissioners (the "Association") has formed committees and appointed
advisory groups to study and formulate regulatory proposals on such diverse
issues as the use of surplus debentures, accounting for reinsurance transactions
and the adoption of risk based capital requirements. It is not possible to
predict the impact of future state and federal regulation on the operations of
DHC or its Insurance Services business.

Effective January 1, 2001, the Association's codified statutory accounting
principles ("SAP") had been adopted by all U.S. insurance companies. The purpose
of such codification is to provide a comprehensive basis of accounting and
reporting to insurance departments. Although codification is expected to be the
foundation of a state's statutory accounting practice, it may be subject to
modification by practices prescribed or permitted by a state's insurance
commissioner. Therefore, statutory financial statements will continue to be
prepared on the basis of accounting practice prescribed or permitted by the
insurance department of the state of domicile. DHC has determined that the
application of the codification did not have a material impact on the statutory
capital of its insurance subsidiaries upon adoption.

Dividends

NAICC is an insurance company domiciled in the State of California and is
regulated by the California Department of Insurance for the benefit of
policyholders. The California Insurance Code does not permit the payment of an
extraordinary shareholder dividend without prior approval from the California
Insurance Commissioner. Dividends are considered extraordinary if they exceed
the greater of net income or 10% of statutory surplus as of the preceding
December 31st. At this time and into the foreseeable future NAICC does not have
sufficient accumulated earned surplus to pay further ordinary dividends.

Capital Adequacy and Risk-Based Capital

A model for determining the risk-based capital ("RBC") requirements for
property and casualty insurance companies was adopted in December 1993. The
model generally assesses DHC's assets at risk and underwriting operations and
determines policyholders' surplus levels to support such activity. NAICC has
calculated its RBC requirement under the most recent RBC model and, as of
December 31, 2003, it had capital in excess of any regulatory action level.

The RBC model sets forth four levels of increasing regulatory intervention:
(1) Company Action Level (200% of an insurer's Authorized Control Level) at
which the insurer must submit to the regulator a plan for increasing such
insurer's capital; (2) Regulatory Action Level (150% of an insurer's Authorized
Control Level), at which the insurer must submit a plan for increasing its
capital to the regulator and the regulator may issue corrective orders; (3)
Authorized Control Level, a multi-step calculation based upon information
derived from an insurer's most recent filed statutory annual statement, at which
the regulator may take action to rehabilitate or liquidate the insurer; and (4)
Mandatory Control Level (70% of an insurer's Authorized Control Level), at which
the regulator must rehabilitate or liquidate the insurer. At December 31, 2003,
the RBC of NAICC was 252% compared to 241% in 2002.

As discussed further in this Report at Item 1, Business - ACL Bankruptcy
Considerations, ACL filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code. As a result, it was determined that NAICC's investment in ACL was fully
impaired for statutory accounting purposes. At December 31, 2002, NAICC
recognized a statutory charge to its surplus of $7.4 million. This charge, when
combined with NAICC's underwriting results and investment losses, reduced its
statutory surplus level below the Company Action Level of NAICC's RBC
calculation. In response, DHC repaid a $4.0 million note due May 2004 to NAICC,
and further contributed $4.0 million to NAICC to increase its statutory capital
during February 2003. With permission from the California Department of
Insurance, these amounts were recorded as admitted assets for

13

statutory accounting purposes at December 31, 2002. After consideration for the
$8.0 million noted above, NAICC's reported capital and surplus as of December
31, 2002 was above the Company Action Level of NAICC's RBC calculation.

In December 2003, DHC contributed $2.0 million to NAICC to increase its
statutory capital.

EMPLOYEES

As of December 31, 2003, on a consolidated basis, DHC employed 64
individuals, of whom two worked for DHC at the parent company level, and 62
worked for NAICC.

RISK FACTORS

The following risk factors could have a material adverse effect on DHC's
business, financial condition and results of operations.

DHC -- SPECIFIC RISKS

Inability to Use Net Loss Tax Carryforwards

One of DHC's significant assets is its NOLs. In order to utilize the NOLs,
DHC must generate taxable income which can offset such carryforwards. The asset
is also utilized by income from certain grantor trusts that were established as
part of the Mission organization. The NOLs will expire if not used. The NOLs
further would be substantially reduced if DHC were to undergo an "ownership
change" within the meaning of Section 382(g)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code.
DHC will be treated as having had an "ownership change" if there is more than a
50% increase in stock ownership during a three year "testing period" by "5%
stockholders".

In order to help DHC preserve the carryforwards, DHC's certificate of
incorporation contains stock transfer restrictions designed to reduce the risk
of an ownership change. The transfer restrictions were implemented in 1990, and
DHC expects that the restrictions will remain in force as long as the NOLs are
available. DHC cannot be certain, however, that these restrictions will prevent
an ownership change.

As of the close of 2003, DHC had consolidated NOLs of $652 million for
federal income tax purposes. The NOLs will expire in various amounts, if not
used, between 2004 and 2023. The Internal Revenue Service has not audited any of
DHC's tax returns for any of the years during the carryforward period including
those returns for the years in which the losses giving rise to the NOLs were
reported.

Additionally, management anticipates that should ACL emerge from
bankruptcy, while DHC will attempt to manage the tax consequences of that
transaction, taxable income could result from ACL debt forgiveness and asset
sales and could reduce DHC's NOLs.

Provisions In DHC's Certificate of Incorporation That Limit Ownership And
Transferability of DHC Stock May Entrench Current Management and The Current
Stockholders.

DHC's certificate of incorporation generally restricts the ability of any
5% holder of DHC Common Stock from disposing or acquiring shares of DHC Common
Stock without DHC's consent. DHC's certificate of incorporation also restricts
the ability of other holders from becoming 5% stockholders without DHC's
consent. DHC may withhold consent if the acquisition or transfer of DHC Common
Stock would create an unreasonable risk of an "ownership change." DHC intends to
vigorously challenge and pursue by all available means any attempt to violate
the restrictions in DHC's certificate of incorporation.

INSURANCE SERVICES -- SPECIFIC RISKS

The Insurance Products Sold by NAICC are Subject to Intense Competition

The insurance products sold by NAICC are subject to intense competition
from many competitors, many of whom have substantially greater resources that
NAICC. There can be no assurance that NAICC will be

14

able to successfully compete in these markets and generate sufficient premium
volume at attractive prices to be profitable. This risk is enhanced by the
reduction in the lines of business NAICC writes as a result of it decision to
reduce underwriting operations.

Insurance Regulations

The insurance industry is highly regulated and it is not possible to
predict the impact of future state and federal regulations on the operations of
NAICC.

If NAICC's Loss Experience Exceeds Its Estimate, Additional Reserves May Be
Required

Unpaid loss and LAE are based on estimates of reported losses, historical
company experience of losses reported by reinsured companies for reinsurance
assumed from such insurers, and historical company experience for unreported
claims. Such liability is, by necessity, based on estimates that may change in
the near term. There can be no assurance that the ultimate liability will not
exceed, or even materially exceed, such estimated amount included herein. If the
ultimate liability materially exceeded estimates, then additional reserves could
be required to be established by some of DHC's insurance subsidiaries. NAICC and
the other insurance subsidiaries cannot provide any assurance that it or they
will be able to obtain such additional capital on commercially reasonable terms
or at all.

Failure to Satisfy Capital Adequacy and Risk-Based Capital Requirements Would
Require NAICC to Obtain Additional Capital

NAICC is subject to certain regulatory RBC requirements. Depending on its
RBC, NAICC could be subject to four levels of increasing regulatory intervention
ranging from company action to mandatory control. NAICC's capital is also one
factor used to determine its ability to distribute or loan funds to DHC. If
NAICC has insufficient reserves, as determined under the risk-based capital
test, it will need to obtain additional capital to establish additional
reserves. NAICC cannot provide any assurance that it will be able to obtain such
additional capital on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

ACL BANKRUPTCY -- SPECIFIC RISKS

The Impact of ACL Bankruptcy May Render DHC's Investment Without Value

While the final result of ACL's bankruptcy proceeding is uncertain, DHC may
receive little or no value for its investment in ACL upon completion of that
proceeding. In addition, as DHC locates additional acquisition opportunities,
the loss of DHC's cash investment in ACL may result in the need to obtain more
equity capital and/or debt in order to fund future acquisitions. There can be no
assurance that such additional capital and/or debt will be available on
acceptable terms or at all.

Uncertainties in the Bankruptcy Process May Adversely Affect ACL

ACL's future results are dependent upon successfully obtaining approval,
confirmation and implementation of a plan of reorganization. ACL has not yet
submitted such a plan to the Bankruptcy Court for approval and cannot make any
assurance that it will be able to submit and obtain confirmation of any such
plan in a timely manner. Failure to confirm a plan in a timely manner could
adversely affect ACL's operating results, as ACL's ability to obtain financing
to fund its operations and its relations with its customers may be harmed by
protracted bankruptcy proceedings.

ACL may, under certain circumstances, file motions with the Bankruptcy
Court to assume or reject executory contracts. An executory contract is one in
which the parties have mutual obligations to perform, such as contracts of
affreightment, charters, equipment leases and real property leases. Unless
otherwise agreed, the assumption of a contract will require ACL to cure or
provide for the cure of all prior defaults under the related contract, including
all pre-petition liabilities. Unless otherwise agreed, the rejection of a
contract is deemed to constitute a breach of the agreement as of the moment
immediately preceding the Chapter 11 filing, giving the counter party a right to
assert a general unsecured claim for damages arising out of the

15

breach. Additional liabilities subject to the proceedings may arise in the
future as a result of the rejection of executory contracts, including leases,
and from the determination of the Bankruptcy Court, or agreement by parties in
interest, of allowed claims for contingencies and other disputed amounts.
Conversely, the assumption of executory contracts and unexpired leases may
convert liabilities shown as subject to compromise to post-petition liabilities.
Due to the uncertain nature of many of the potential claims, ACL is unable to
project the magnitude of such claims with any degree of certainty.

The Adverse Publicity of ACL's Bankruptcy Could Adversely Affect Its Results
of Operations

The potential adverse publicity associated with the Chapter 11 filing and
the resulting uncertainty regarding ACL's future prospects may hinder ACL's
ongoing business activities and its ability to operate, fund and execute its
business plan by:

- impairing relations with existing and potential customers;

- negatively impacting the ability of ACL to attract, retain and compensate
key executives and associates and to retain employees generally;

- limiting ACL's ability to obtain trade credit; and

- impairing present and future relationships with vendors and service
providers.

Uncertainties in The Bankruptcy Process May Adversely Affect the Value of
DHC's Investment in ACL

Currently, it is not possible to predict with certainty the length of time
ACL will operate under the protection of Chapter 11, the outcome of the Chapter
11 proceedings in general, or the effect of the proceedings on the business of
ACL or on the interests of the various creditors and stakeholders. Under the
priority scheme established by the Bankruptcy Code, many post-petition
liabilities and pre-petition liabilities need to be satisfied before equity
holders can receive any distribution. DHC, directly and indirectly, holds 100%
of the equity interests in ACL. The ultimate recovery to DHC, if any, will not
be determined until confirmation of a plan of reorganization. There can be no
assurance as to what value, if any, will be ascribed to DHC's equity interests
in ACL and the other Debtors in the bankruptcy proceedings, and the value of
such equity interests could be substantially or totally diluted or cancelled.

Disputes among Creditors Could Prolong the ACL Bankruptcy Process

The unsecured creditors committee appointed in the bankruptcy proceedings
has the right to be heard on all matters that come before the Bankruptcy Court.
There can be no assurance that the unsecured creditors committee will support
ACL's positions in the bankruptcy proceeding or the plan(s) of reorganization
once proposed, and disagreements between ACL and the committee could protract
the bankruptcy proceedings, could negatively impact ACL's ability to operate
during bankruptcy and could delay ACL's emergence from bankruptcy.

The Ongoing Costs of the Bankruptcy Process May Affect ACL's Results of
Operations and Cash Flows

ACL has incurred and will continue to incur significant costs associated
with the reorganization. The amount of these costs, which are being expensed as
incurred, are expected to have a significant adverse affect on its results of
operations and cash flows.

ACL May Not Be Able to Reorganize in Chapter 11

Additional risks associated with the reorganization of ACL and its
emergence from Chapter 11 include, but are not limited to, adverse developments
with respect to ACL's liquidity, poor results of operations limiting ACL's
ability to continue as a going concern, and the availability of exit financing
to facilitate emergence from Chapter 11 pursuant to a plan of reorganization. In
addition, third parties could seek and obtain court approval to: terminate or
shorten the exclusivity period for ACL to propose and confirm one or

16

more plans of reorganization; appoint a Chapter 11 trustee or convert ACL's
cases to Chapter 7 cases for the liquidation of its businesses.

ACL May Not Be Able to Repay Its Debt Obligations

As a result of ACL's Chapter 11 filings, events of default under ACL's
senior credit facilities, senior notes, payment in kind notes and old senior
notes have occurred. However, under Chapter 11, actions by creditors to collect
claims on pre-petition debt are stayed or deferred unless specifically ordered
by the Bankruptcy Court. If and when ACL emerges from bankruptcy it is likely
that it will continue to be highly leveraged with substantial debt service
obligations. ACL's senior credit facilities and other indebtedness could be
replaced by new credit facilities with substantial, and possibly more
restrictive, covenants. Thus, ACL's leveraged position could have a material
adverse effect on ACL's business, financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows. For example, ACL's substantial leverage position after bankruptcy
could:

- limit ACL's ability to obtain additional financing to fund future working
capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate requirements;

- increase ACL's vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry
conditions;

- require ACL to dedicate a substantial portion of its cash flow from
operations to the payment of principal of, and interest on, its
indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of such cash flow to fund
working capital, capital expenditures or other general corporate
requirements;

- limit ACL's flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in its
business and the industry in which it competes; and

- place ACL at a competitive disadvantage compared to its less leveraged
competitors.

ACL Assets Sales May Be Below Current Net Book Value

In connection with the development of alternative plans of reorganization
under Chapter 11, ACL will evaluate proposals to maximize the value of all ACL's
stakeholders, including the sale of certain of its remaining business lines.
There can be no assurance that ACL will be able to consummate such asset sales
or that any asset sales will be at or greater than the current net book value of
such assets.

ACL's Liquidity Is Dependent on A Number of Factors Which Could Adversely
Affect Its Ability to Emerge from Bankruptcy

ACL's liquidity generally depends on cash provided by operating activities
and access to its debtor in possession credit facility, commonly referred to as
the "DIP". The ability of ACL to continue as a going concern, including its
ability to meet post-petition obligations, and the continued appropriateness of
using the going concern basis for its financial statements are dependent upon,
among other things:

- ACL's ability to comply with the covenants of its DIP credit facility;

- the ability of ACL to maintain adequate cash on hand;

- the ability of ACL to continue to generate cash from operations;

- confirmation of a plan of reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code and
the terms of such plan;

- ability of ACL to attract, retain and compensate key executives and
associates and to retain employees generally; and

- ACL's ability to achieve profitability following such confirmation.

The failure of ACL to operate as a going concern and emerge from bankruptcy
would result in the liquidation and sale of ACL's assets which under certain
circumstances could result in the imposition of statutory pension obligations
against DHC.

17

AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION

DHC's Internet site (www.danielsonholding.com) makes available to
interested parties DHC's Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form
10-Q, and Current Reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments and exhibits to those
reports, all reports filed on Forms 3, 4 and 5 with respect to the Common Stock,
as well as all other reports and schedules DHC files electronically with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), as soon as reasonably
practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the
SEC. Interested parties may also find reports, proxy and information statements
and other information on issuers that file electronically with the SEC at the
SEC's Internet site (www.sec.gov).

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

NAICC's headquarters is located in a leased office facility near Long
Beach, California, pursuant to a five-year lease which is scheduled to expire in
2004. NAICC is in current negotiation with various potential lessors for new
office space in the Long Beach metropolitan area. It is anticipated that a new
lease will be signed in 2004 for five years at square footage and total rent
costs that are substantially less than what it currently maintains and incurs.

See Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for
additional information on NAICC's leases.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

NAICC is a party to various legal proceedings which are considered routine
and incidental to its insurance business and are not expected to be material to
the financial condition or results of operations of NAICC.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

DHC held its Annual Meeting of Shareholders on November 5, 2003.

DHC's shareholders voted on the following proposals:

1. To elect eight directors to serve a one-year term that will expire
at the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The votes cast for each
director were as follows:

2. To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent
auditors of DHC for the year ending December 31, 2003.

For 24,322,205

Against 401,685

Abstentions 20,589

18

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS,
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

DHC Common Stock is listed and traded on the American Stock Exchange
(symbol: DHC). On March 10, 2004, there were approximately 1,105 holders of
record of Common Stock. On March 10, 2004, the closing price of the Common Stock
on the American Stock Exchange was $9.50.

The following table sets forth the high, low and closing stock prices of
the Common Stock for the last two years, as reported on the American Stock
Exchange Composite Tape.

DHC has not paid dividends on its Common Stock and does not expect to
declare or pay any dividends in the foreseeable future.

On December 2, 2003, DHC entered into a note purchase agreement with the
Bridge Lenders pursuant to which in consideration for the $40 million of bridge
financing in the form of convertible notes and the agreement by the Bridge
Lenders to arrange or provide for the $118 million second lien letter of credit
facility and for Laminar to arrange or provide for the $10 million international
revolving credit facility, DHC issued to the Bridge Lenders an aggregate of
5,120,853 shares of Common Stock. At the time that DHC entered into the note
purchase agreement, agreed to issue the notes convertible into shares of Common
Stock and issued the equity compensation to the Bridge Lenders, the closing
price of the Common Stock on the American Stock Exchange on the day prior to
announcement of the Covanta acquisition was $1.40 per share, which was below the
$1.53 per share conversion price of the notes.

Pursuant to their terms, the notes are convertible into Common Stock at a
price of $1.53 per share without action by the Bridge Lenders if all or any
portion of the notes are not repaid pursuant to a rights offering, subject to
certain agreed upon limitations necessitated by DHC's NOLs.

In addition, under the note purchase agreement, Laminar has agreed to
convert an amount of convertible notes in order to acquire up to an additional
8.75 million shares of the Common Stock at $1.53 per share based upon the levels
of public participation in the rights offering.

The Bridge Lenders were all sophisticated investors that conducted due
diligence on DHC and were either affiliated with members of, or had the
opportunity to ask questions of, management in connection with the drafting and
negotiation of the note purchase agreement. The issuance of the Common Stock
issued to the Bridge Lenders was exempt from registration pursuant to private
offering exemption of Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

19

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

As a result of the consummation of the Covanta acquisition on March 10,
2004, the future performance of DHC will predominantly reflect the performance
of Covanta's operations which are significantly larger than DHC's insurance
operations. As a result, the nature of DHC's business, the risks attendant to
such business and the trends that it will face will be significantly altered by
the acquisition of Covanta. Accordingly, DHC's prior financial performance and
results of operations will not be indicative of its future performance.
- ---------------

(1) In 2002, DHC purchased 100% of ACL, 5.4% of GMS and 50% of Vessel Leasing.

(2) ACL, which was acquired on May 29, 2002, and certain of its subsidiaries,
filed a petition on January 31, 2003 with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Indiana, New Albany Division to reorganize under
Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. As a result of this filing, while
DHC continues to exercise significant influence over the operating and
financial policies of ACL, it no longer maintains control of the activities
of ACL. Accordingly, DHC no longer includes ACL and its subsidiaries as
consolidated subsidiaries in DHC's financial statements. DHC's investments
in these entities are presented using the equity method effective as of the
beginning of the year ending December 31, 2003. Other (loss) income above
consists of DHC's equity in the net loss of ACL, GMS and Vessel Leasing in
2003.

(3) Does not give effect to currently exercisable options, and, in 2001, 2000
and 1999, warrants to purchase shares of Common Stock.

20

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K may constitute
"forward-looking" statements as defined in Section 27A of the Securities Act of
1933 (the "Securities Act"), Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the "Exchange Act"), the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the
"PSLRA") or in releases made by the SEC, all as may be amended from time to
time. Such forward looking statements involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other important factors that could cause the actual results,
performance or achievements of DHC and its subsidiaries, or industry results, to
differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed
or implied by such forward-looking statements. Statements that are not
historical fact are forward-looking statements. Forward looking statements can
be identified by, among other things, the use of forward-looking language, such
as the words "plan", "believe", "expect", "anticipate", "intend", "estimate",
"project", "may", "will", "would", "could", "should", "seeks", or "scheduled
to", or other similar words, or the negative of these terms or other variations
of these terms or comparable language, or by discussion of strategy or
intentions. These cautionary statements are being made pursuant to the
Securities Act, the Exchange Act and the PSLRA with the intention of obtaining
the benefits of the "safe harbor" provisions of such laws. DHC cautions
investors that any forward-looking statements made by DHC are not guarantees or
indicative of future performance. Important assumptions and other important
factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
forward-looking statements with respect to DHC, include, but are not limited to,
the risks and uncertainties affecting the businesses described in Item 1.

Although DHC believes that its plans, intentions and expectations reflected
in or suggested by such forward-looking statements are reasonable, actual
results could differ materially from a projection or assumption in any of its
forward-looking statements. DHC's future financial condition and results of
operations, as well as any forward-looking statements, are made only as of the
date hereof and DHC does not have or undertake any obligation to update or
revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information,
subsequent events or otherwise, unless otherwise required by law.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS

OVERVIEW AND SIGNIFICANT EVENTS

DHC is organized as a holding company with substantially all of its current
operations conducted in the insurance services industry. DHC also has
investments in companies engaged in the Marine Services industry which,
beginning in 2003, are accounted for under the equity method.

However, as a result of the consummation of the Covanta acquisition on
March 10, 2004, the future performance of DHC will predominantly reflect the
performance of Covanta's operations which are significantly larger than DHC's
insurance operations. As a result, the nature of DHC's business, the risks
attendant to such business and the trends that it will face will be
significantly altered by the acquisition of Covanta. Accordingly, DHC's prior
financial performance will not be indicative of its future performance.

In addition to the risks attendant to the operation of the Covanta energy
and water businesses in the future and the integration of Covanta and its
employees into DHC, the ability of DHC to utilize its NOLs to offset income
generated by the Covanta operations will have a material affect on DHC's
financial condition and results of operations.

DHC, on a parent-only basis, has continuing expenditures for administrative
expenses and derives revenues primarily from investment returns on portfolio
securities. Therefore, the analysis of DHC's financial condition is generally
done on an operating subsidiary basis. As of December 31, 2003, DHC had
approximately $652 million in federal tax NOLs. DHC's strategic and business
plan is to acquire businesses that will allow DHC to earn an attractive return
on its investments.

In May 2002, DHC acquired a 100% ownership interest in ACL thereby entering
into the marine transportation, construction and related service provider
businesses. On January 31, 2003, ACL and certain of its subsidiaries and its
immediate direct parent entity, ACL Holdings, filed a petition with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court to reorganize under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.

21

Accordingly, DHC wrote off its remaining investment in ACL at the end of
the first quarter of 2003 as an other than temporary asset impairment (see Note
20 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).

As a result of the bankruptcy filing, while DHC continues to exercise
influence over the operating and financial policies of ACL, it no longer
maintains control of ACL. Accordingly, for the year ended December 31, 2003, DHC
has accounted for its investments in ACL, GMS and Vessel Leasing using the
equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, DHC reports
its share of the equity investees' income or loss based on its ownership
interest.

As a result of ACL's continued losses and DHC management's belief that it
may recover little, if any, of its investment in ACL, DHC wrote off its
remaining investment in ACL at the end of the first quarter of 2003 as an other
than temporary asset impairment (see Note 20 of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements).

Since DHC wrote of its investment in ACL in 2003 and did not have any
Marine Services' operations in 2001 and, since neither DHC nor the other Marine
Services subsidiaries (GMS and Vessel Leasing) are guarantors of ACL's debt nor
are they liable for any of ACL's liabilities, the commentary included in this
Item 7 with respect to the financial condition and results of operations of
Marine Services is limited. An expanded discussion and analysis would not
reflect DHC's current or future operations and, accordingly, would not be
meaningful.

INSURANCE OPERATIONS

The only active insurance products currently being sold by DHC's insurance
subsidiaries are in the California non-standard personal automobile insurance
line. Other than run-off of other lines and insurance that NAICC is statutorily
required to offer, NAICC is not actively operating any other lines of insurance
business due to unfavorable loss development and capital requirements. NAICC's
objective with respect to its remaining business is to underwrite business that
is expected to yield an underwriting profit. As of July 7, 2003, NAICC ceased
writing new policy applications for commercial automobile insurance and began
the process of providing the required statutory notice of its intention not to
renew existing policies. NAICC expects that by September 2004 it will have
completely exited the commercial automobile marketplace.

TAXES

DHC does not currently pay regular federal income tax due to its NOLs and
the recognition of losses from several trusts that assumed various liabilities
of certain present and former subsidiaries of DHC. It is expected that DHC's
2003 consolidated federal income tax return will report a cumulative NOL
currently estimated at $652 million, which will expire in various amounts, if
not used, between 2004 and 2023. Exclusive of the trusts' activities, DHC has
generated cumulative taxable losses both historically and during the prior three
years. Over the past several years, DHC's insurance operations have been
generating losses exclusive of net investment income, net realized gains and the
trusts' activities.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (2003/2002)

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 COMPARED WITH YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 27, 2002

Insurance Services Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared with Year Ended
December 31, 2002

The change in net earned premiums during those years is directly related to
the change in net written premiums. Net written premiums were $30.4 million and
$52.7 million in 2003 and 2002, respectively. Net earned premiums exceeded net
written premiums in 2002 due to the decision to cease writing in several lines
of business as noted above.

The overall decrease in net written premiums for 2003 over the comparable
period in 2002 was attributable to a significant reduction in NAICC's commercial
automobile line and the decision made in 2001 to exit both the workers'
compensation line of business in all states and private passenger automobile
outside of California. Workers' compensation net written premiums decreased by
$7.3 million during 2003 over the

22

comparable period in 2002. The commercial automobile net written premiums
decreased from $19.5 million in 2002 to $11.9 million in 2003 due to the
decision to exit the line in July 2003. Net written premiums for personal
automobile lines decreased by $7.4 million during 2003 primarily due to
underwriting restrictions placed on the non-standard California private
passenger automobile program and the decline in net written premiums outside of
California.

Premium and fees receivable, net of allowances, decreased by $5.4 million
or 70%. The decrease in 2003 was attributable to NAICC's decision to
significantly reduce underwriting operations by exiting the commercial
automobile line and placing underwriting restrictions on the California
non-standard private passenger automobile line.

The $1.2 million net decrease in the allowance for premiums and fees
receivable during 2003 was primarily attributable to the write-off of $1.4
million of outstanding balances from 2001 and 2002 against the allowance. These
write-offs were partially offset by an increase in the allowance of $0.2 million
during 2003. NAICC made changes to its commercial auto installment plans for
policies written in 2003, which improved overall collection rates. The net
increase in the allowance for premiums and fees receivable during 2002 of $0.2
million was attributable to the increase in installment written premiums during
2001 prior to the decision to contract underwriting operations in the commercial
automobile line. As a result, NAICC increased both its allowance for premiums
and the amount written-off against such allowance during 2002.

Net investment income decreased primarily due to a decrease in the fixed
income portfolio basis as well as a reduction in the portfolio yield.
Fixed-income invested asset portfolio decreased by $5.6 million in 2003, despite
net loss and LAE reserves declining by $8.6 million. The differential was a
result of NAICC disposing of substantially all of its equity security holdings
in the 4th quarter of 2003 and reinvesting those proceeds, approximately $4.1
million, in fixed income securities. Additionally, NAICC received from DHC $2.0
million in additional paid-in capital at year-end. Due to the decrease in
written premiums on business placed in run-off noted above, NAICC also
experienced negative underwriting cash flows. As of December 31, 2003 and 2002,
the weighted average yield on NAICC's portfolio was 4.9% and 5.9%, respectively.
The effective duration of the portfolio at December 31, 2003 was 2.29 years
which management believes is appropriate given the relative short-tail nature of
the auto programs and projected run-off of all lines of business.

In 2003, NAICC recognized $1.0 million in gains from fixed income
securities that were maturing in 2004 as a consequence of a dynamic interest
rate environment throughout the year. In 2002, a realized investment gain of
$5.2 million was recognized upon conversion of the ACL notes into equity. This
gain, was offset by a $5.1 million loss on non-affiliated equity securities and
a $0.9 million gain on fixed maturities. Of the $5.1 million loss on equity
securities, $1.0 million was recorded for other than temporary declines in fair
value. NAICC had a net unrealized loss of $1.4 million on its equity portfolio
at the end of December 2002 and a modest net unrealized gain at December 31,
2003.

Net losses and LAE ratios were 102.3% in 2003 and 96.3% in 2002. The
increase in the loss and LAE ratio during 2003 was attributable to further
recognition of prior accident year reserve development on workers' compensation
and commercial automobile insurance. NAICC has historically priced its non-
standard private passenger and commercial auto premium at 68% to 69% of its
expected loss and allocated loss adjustment expense ("ALAE") costs in order to
balance its expense structure and market conditions. In 2003, NAICC believed it
had a far more successful underwriting year, posting loss and ALAE ratios of
60.4% and 59.5% for its California non-standard auto and entire commercial auto
program. These results were commensurate with industry results for 2003 driven
primarily by the hard insurance market. Non-standard private passenger and
commercial auto claim frequency was 10.4 and 7.9 vehicles per claim in accident
year 2003 compared to 8.8 and 7.7 in 2002, respectively. Severity was favorable
for both lines as well in 2003 compared to 2002 by reduction of average cost per
claim of 3% and 6% for the personal and commercial auto lines, respectively.
Although both these indicators were favorable in 2003, the average premium per
vehicle on commercial lines had the most significant effect on the loss and ALAE
ratio. The average premium per vehicle on commercial lines increased 17.8% for
the 2003 accident year. With respect to the personal automobile insurance, the
mix of business moving towards non-owner policies 28% in 2003 versus 10% in 2002

23

had the most significant impact. Historically non-owner policies yield loss and
ALAE ratios 10 to 30 basis points lower than owner policies.

Policy acquisition costs as a percentage of net earned premiums were 22.2%
in 2003 and 22.7% in 2002. Policy acquisition costs include expenses which are
directly related to premium volume (i.e., commissions, premium taxes and state
assessments) as well as certain underwriting expenses which vary with and are
directly related to policy issuance. The modest decrease was a result of change
in the mix of business and a favorable renegotiation by NAICC of its commission
structure with its general agent in the fourth quarter of 2003.

General and administrative expenses increased in 2003 primarily due to
recording an additional allowance for uncollectable reinsurance recoverable of
$1.3 million and $0.2 million in employee severance expenses related to business
contraction. Exclusive of the two items noted above, expenses decreased $0.7
million compared to 2002 due to decreased production and previously implemented
cost containment efforts. NAICC continues to examine its expense structure;
however, given the decision to reduce net writings and its obligation to run-off
several lines of business, a core amount of fixed governance costs is required
and consequently its expense ratio will be higher than industry averages until
it can increase premium production.

Parent Company Only Investment Income and Administrative Expense -- Year Ended
December 31, 2003 Compared with Year Ended December 27, 2002

Investment Income. Total parent company investment income decreased to
$1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 as compared to $9.5 million
for the year ending December 27, 2002 primarily due to recognition of $8.4
million in gain on ACL bonds owned by DHC that were contributed as part of the
purchase price of ACL Holdings recognized during 2002.

Administrative Expense. Parent company administrative expense decreased
$0.7 million to $4.2 million for the year ended December 2003 as compared to
$4.9 million for the year ended December 2002. The decrease is primarily due to
a reduction of facility and payroll related costs. In 2003, DHC entered into a
corporate services agreement with Equity Group Investments, L.L.C. ("EGI").
Samuel Zell, the Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of
DHC, is also the Chairman of EGI and Philip Tinkler, Chief Financial Officer of
DHC, is also an executive officer of EGI. EGI provided financial and
administrative services to DHC. Subsequent to the ACL acquisition in 2002, ACL
provided similar support services to DHC.

Interest Expense -- Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared with Year Ended
December 27, 2002

Interest expense decreased to $1.4 million for the year ended December 31,
2003 compared to $38.7 million during the year ended December 27, 2002. Interest
expense in 2003 was due to the accrual of one month of interest on the bridge
financing required for the Covanta acquisition. Interest expense in 2002 was
primarily due to ACL's and GMS' interest expense after the acquisition.

Equity in Net Loss of Unconsolidated Marine Services Subsidiaries -- Year
Ended December 31, 2003 Compared with Year Ended December 27, 2002

As a result of ACL's bankruptcy filing, while DHC continues to exercise
influence over the operating and financial policies of ACL, it no longer
maintains control of ACL. Accordingly, for the year ended December 31, 2003, DHC
has accounted for its investments in ACL, GMS and Vessel Leasing using the
equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, DHC reports
its share of the equity investees' income or loss based on its ownership
interest.

As a result of ACL's continued losses and DHC management's belief that it
may recover little, if any, of its investment in ACL, DHC wrote off its
remaining investment in ACL during the first quarter of 2003. The equity in net
loss of unconsolidated Marine Services subsidiaries included a loss from ACL of
$47.0 million, an other than temporary impairment of the remaining investment in
ACL of $8.2 million, and income from GMS and Vessel Leasing of $0.3 million. The
GMS and Vessel Leasing investments are not considered to be impaired. (The
Marine Services subsidiaries' operating results in 2002 were consolidated in
DHC's operating

24

results from the date of acquisition, May 29, 2002, through December 27, 2002,
but were deconsolidated in 2003 as a result of ACL's bankruptcy.)

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (2002/2001)

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 27, 2002 COMPARED WITH YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001

Insurance Services Year Ended December 31, 2002 Compared with Year Ended
December 31, 2001

The decline in net earned premiums is directly related to the change in net
premiums written. Net written premiums were $52.6 million and $80.4 million in
2002 and 2001, respectively. Net earned premiums exceeded net written premiums
in 2002 due to the decision to cease writing in several lines of business as
noted above.

The overall decrease in net written premiums for 2002 over the comparable
period in 2001 is attributable to significant reduction in NAICC's commercial
automobile line and the decision made in 2001 to exit both the workers'
compensation line of business in all states and private passenger automobile
outside of California. Workers' compensation net written premiums decreased by
$14.1 million during 2002 over the comparable period in 2001. The commercial
automobile net written premiums decreased from $38.4 million in 2001 to $19.5
million in 2002 due to curtailed underwriting activity. Net written premiums for
personal automobile lines increased by $5.3 million during 2002 primarily due to
premium growth in the non-standard California private passenger automobile
programs in excess of the decline in net written premiums outside of California,
coupled with non-renewing its 10% quota-share reinsurance agreement on the
California business.

Premium and fees receivable, net of allowances, decreased by $7.2 million
or 49%. The decrease is attributable to the decision to significantly reduce
NAICC's underwriting operations. Prior to that decision, NAICC experienced
significant growth in installment premiums related to its commercial automobile
program during 2001. NAICC's automobile programs have installment features on
policy terms in excess of six months. Premiums from the automobile program that
generally offer policy terms less than six months and do not utilize installment
plans increased in 2002. The effect of these trends was to magnify the overall
decrease in installment premium receivable during 2002.

The increase in the allowance for premiums and fees receivable during 2002
of $0.2 million was attributable to the increase in installment premiums during
2001 prior to the decision to contract underwriting operations in the commercial
automobile line. In conjunction with the increase in installment premiums during
2001, NAICC experienced an increase in collection efforts relating to such
premiums. As a result, NAICC increased both its allowance for premiums and the
amount written-off against such allowance during 2002.

Net investment income was $5.6 million in 2002 compared to $7.6 million in
2001. The net investment income decrease was due primarily to a decrease in the
fixed income portfolio. The fixed-income invested asset portfolio decreased by
$25.9 million in 2002. Such decrease was attributable to the conversion of $9.2
million of ACL notes into equity. As a result of the decrease in written
premiums on business placed in run-off noted above, NAICC also experienced
negative underwriting cash flows. As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, the average
yield on NAICC's portfolio was 5.9% and 5.8%, respectively. The estimated
average duration of the portfolio at December 31, 2002 was 2.7 years compared to
3.2 years at December 31, 2001.

Net realized investment gains were relatively comparable due to the gain
recognized on the conversion of ACL bonds to equity. Otherwise the net realized
losses of 2002 and gains in 2001 were consistent with the general economic
trends for those periods.

The net loss and LAE ratios were 96.3% in 2002 and 93.5% in 2001. The
increase in the loss and LAE ratio during 2002 was attributable to higher than
expected losses in the California private passenger automobile and commercial
automobile programs totaling $2.8 million and $2.0 million, respectively. In
addition, NAICC had significant adverse development in the California workers'
compensation line and non-California private passenger automobile. Adverse
development on prior accident years recognized for workers' compensation in 2002
was $3.6 million. The adverse development for prior accident years related to
the private

25

passenger automobile lines placed in run-off was $2.0 million. Adverse
development on prior accident years recognized for workers' compensation in 2001
totaled $4.4 million. The adverse development for prior accident years related
to the private passenger automobile lines placed in run-off was $2.4 million.

As a percentage of net earned premiums, policy acquisition expenses were
22.7% in 2002 and 25.4% in 2001. The decrease in the policy acquisition expense
ratio in 2002, compared to 2001, was due to a reduction of marketing costs of
$1.9 million primarily as the result of the decision in 2001 to exit those lines
mentioned above.

General and administrative expenses decreased in 2002 due to previously
implemented cost containment efforts. General and administrative expenses in
2001 also included $0.9 million in amortization of goodwill expense. As a
percentage of net earned premiums, general and administrative expenses were 9.5%
in 2002 and 10.6% in 2001. The decrease in 2002 reflects decreased production in
2002 and the effect of cost saving measures implemented during 2001. The 2001
ratio included an additional $1.2 million of costs associated with the decision
to contract NAICC's underwriting operations. Those costs included employee
severance payments of approximately $0.5 million and a write-off of goodwill of
approximately $0.7 million. These costs added 1.5% to the 2001 ratio.

Marine Services -- Year Ended December 27, 2002 Compared with Year Ended
December 28, 2001

ACL follows a 52/53 week fiscal year ending on the last Friday in December
of each year.

Marine Services operating revenues and operating expenses in 2002 consisted
of ACL, GMS and Vessel Leasing operating revenues and expenses since the date of
acquisition (May 29, 2002).

Parent Company Only Investment Income and Administrative Expense -- Year Ended
December 27, 2002 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2001

Investment Income. Total parent company investment income increased to
$9.5 million for the year ending December 2002 as compared to $2.0 million for
the year ending December 2001 primarily due to recognition of $8.4 million in
gain on ACL bonds owned by DHC that were contributed as part of the purchase
price of ACL Holdings.

Administrative Expense. Parent company administrative expense increased
$2.5 million to $4.9 million for the year ending December 2002, as compared to
$2.4 million for the year ending December 2001. The increase was primarily due
to expense for stock options, which were modified as of July 24, 2002, one time
increases in management compensation related to the resignation of certain DHC
management in connection with its acquisition of ACL, higher directors' fees and
additional insurance expense. Prior to the acquisition of ACL and shortly
thereafter, DHC shared certain personnel and facilities with several affiliated
and unaffiliated companies that had certain common directors and officers, and
certain expenses were allocated among the various entities. Personnel costs were
allocated based upon actual time spent on DHC business. Costs relating to office
space and equipment were allocated based upon actual usage. Management believes
the methodology used for allocation was appropriate. Total expenses included
$1.8 million in 2002 and $1.3 million in 2001 related to expenses allocated to
DHC from affiliated entities.

Interest Expense -- Year Ended December 27, 2002 Compared with Year Ended
December 31, 2001

Interest expense increased to $38.7 million for the year ended December 27,
2002 compared to no interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2001
primarily due to ACL's and GMS' interest expense after the acquisition.

OUTLOOK

NAICC management expects that the business environment in California
non-standard personal auto to remain favorable. It appears there are fewer
markets to place non-standard risks, which aided NAICC in 2002 to raise rates
and renew 92.1% of its policyholders in 2003. NAICC expects a similar renewal
rate for 2004. NAICC expects the hard market to continue in 2004 as new entrants
are priced reasonably and ongoing
26

programs are tightening underwriting guidelines while a few are filing rate
increases. The decision to exit the commercial auto market will negatively
impact NAICC as it loses operating leverage on its general and administrative
expenses and will have less earned premium during a relative hard market cycle.
With the passage of AB 227 and SB 227, which was intended to serve to contain
medical costs for the struggling California workers' compensation market, NAICC
is anticipating these measures and future legislation will mitigate the adverse
development trend previously recognized. NAICC will continue to aggressively
pursue commutations on the Stuyvesant business but as there has been an influx
of newly reported A&E claims over the last three years, NAICC's ability to
discharge these risks will be more difficult. NAICC is evaluating other
strategies to further segregate these liabilities from the active entities that
could promote commutations. NAICC has come to rely upon its investment income to
mitigate the shortfall on underwriting results, but as it continues to
experience negative cash flow due to its operations that are in run-off and 40
year lows in interest rates, NAICC does not expect to receive the same level of
investment income, as in 2002 and prior.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for
the same period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

NAICC estimates reserves for unpaid losses and LAE based on reported losses
and historical experience, including losses reported by other insurance
companies for reinsurance assumed, and estimates of expenses for investigating
and adjusting all incurred and unadjusted claims. Key assumptions used in the
estimation process could have significant effects on the reserve balances. NAICC
regularly evaluates their estimates and assumptions based on historical
experience adjusted for current economic conditions and trends. Changes in the
unpaid losses and LAE can materially effect the statement of operations.
Different estimates could have been used in the current period, and changes in
the accounting estimates are reasonably likely to occur from period to period
based on the economic conditions. Since the loss reserving process is complex
and subjective, the ultimate liability may vary significantly from our
estimates.

The Insurance Services group has claims for environmental clean up against
policies issued prior to 1970. The unpaid loss and LAE related to environmental
cleanup has been established considering facts currently known and the current
state of the law and coverage litigation.

Due to the factors discussed above and others, the process used in
estimating unpaid losses and LAE cannot provide an exact result. DHC's results
of operations for each of the past three years have been adversely affected by
insurance loss development related to prior years of $13.5 million, $10.4
million and $7.6 million for 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

Statement of Financial Accounting standards No. 123, "Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation," ("SFAS 123") gives companies the choice to account
for stock-based compensation using either the fair value method or the intrinsic
value method of APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees."
DHC has elected to account for its stock option plans using the intrinsic value
method for grants to employees and directors. Because all of the options granted
to employees and directors under those plans have had an exercise price equal to
or greater than the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of
grant, only minimal stock-based compensation cost due to modifications has been
recognized in the consolidated statements of operations for those options. DHC
accounts for its stock options granted to contractors using the fair value
method of SFAS 123. Had DHC elected to account for all of its stock option
grants using the fair value method of SFAS 123, or if accounting rules change to
require accounting different than the intrinsic value method, DHC's results of
operations could be significantly affected.

Note 1 in Item 8, Financial Statements -- Significant Accounting Policies,
includes supplemental information, including pro forma net loss and loss per
share, as if stock-based compensation cost for all of the stock option grants
had been determined using the fair value method of SFAS 123. The fair value of
these options was estimated at the date of grant or modification using a
Black-Scholes option pricing model with
27

assumptions about the dividend yield, risk-free interest rate, expected option
life, and expected stock price volatility. These assumptions can be highly
subjective. Because stock options have characteristics different from those of
traded options, changes in the subjective assumptions can materially affect the
fair value of stock options. Using different assumptions, the supplemental
information provided in Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements, could be significantly different.

See Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
further discussion of DHC's significant accounting policies.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

DHC is a holding company that conducts substantially all of its operations
through its subsidiaries. As such, DHC has limited liquidity and capital
resources at the parent company level. As more fully described elsewhere in this
filing, DHC's insurance subsidiary is currently unable to distribute or loan
funds to DHC. As a result, DHC is dependent on income from its holding company
investments, and monetizing its holding company investments to provide liquidity
and capital resources. In addition, DHC may be able to raise funds from the
equity markets and borrow funds as it deems appropriate to fund operations and
potential acquisitions. However, there can be no assurance that such additional
equity capital or debt will be available to DHC on acceptable terms or at all.

PARENT COMPANY OPERATIONS

At December 31, 2003, DHC on a parent-only basis, held cash and investments
of approximately $41.0 million, including a restricted escrow account of $37.0
million. The escrow was required for the Covanta acquisition. Upon closing of
the Covanta acquisition on March 8, 2004, this escrow was released and
disbursed, $30.0 million in consideration of the purchase of Covanta and the
remaining $7.0 million was released to DHC to pay corporate expenses and
acquisition costs. Unpaid acquisition costs are currently estimated at
approximately $6.6 million. Additionally, a balance of $1.0 million is due to
DHC from Covanta to reimburse DHC's acquisition related expenses.

On a parent-only basis, at December 31, 2003, DHC owed $40 million plus
accrued interest of $0.4 million on a bridge financing agreement relating to the
Covanta acquisition. This debt accrues interest at 12% through July 15, 2004 and
16% thereafter and has a scheduled maturity date of January 2, 2005. DHC plans
to repay this obligation with proceeds from the rights offering. Under the terms
of the note purchase agreement, DHC is obligated to file a registration
statement with the SEC to register the rights offering not later than May 24,
2004, 75 days following the closing of the Covanta acquisition. If DHC does not
repay all of the outstanding debt through the rights offering proceeds, the
remaining balance will be converted into Common Stock, subject to certain
limitations. Additionally, Laminar has agreed, under the note purchase
agreement, to convert an amount of their notes to acquire up to 8.75 million
shares of Common Stock at $1.53 per share, based on public participation in the
rights offering. DHC has also agreed to sell up to 3 million shares of Common
Stock to certain creditors of Covanta for $1.53 per share, based on public
participation in the rights offering and subject to other limitations.

28

Assuming full public participation in the rights offering and repayment of
the bridge financing at June 30, 2004, following are the expected inflows and
outflows relating to the rights offering, sale of shares to Covanta creditors
and subsequent repayment of bridge financing:

There can be no assurances as to the extent of the public participation in
the planned rights offering. Management believes that even with less than full
public participation, DHC will have sufficient capital resources to meet
short-term and long-term liquidity needs.

DHC's sources of funds are its investments as well as dividends, if any,
received from its insurance subsidiary. Various state insurance requirements
restrict the amounts that may be transferred to DHC in the form of dividends or
loans from its insurance subsidiaries without prior regulatory approval.
Currently, NAICC cannot pay dividends or make loans to DHC.

For the year ended December 2003, cash provided by parent-only operating
activities was $0.1 million. For the years ended December 2002 and 2001, cash
used in parent-only operating activities was $4.8 million and $0.9 million,
respectively. Cash used in operations is primarily attributable to wages and
benefit costs, professional fees, directors' fees, insurance and other working
capital requirements of the holding company's business. The increase in cash
used in 2002 as compared to 2001 is due to additional insurance premium
payments, one time increases in management compensation related to the
resignation of certain DHC management in connection with its acquisition of ACL
and higher director's fees.

Net cash used in investing activities was $33.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003 and was primarily comprised of a deposit of $37.0 million to
the escrow required for the Covanta acquisition, contribution of $6.0 million to
NAICC's statutory capital, repayment of a loan in the amount of $6.0 million
received from an ACL affiliate and $4.1 million received from the sale of
investment securities.

In 2002, DHC paid cash of $42.7 million, including $6.6 million in fees,
for the acquisition of ACL, 50% of the common interest of Vessel Leasing and
5.4% of the equity of GMS. This was financed through rights offering proceeds of
$42.2 million, the exercise of Common Stock warrants of $9.5 and the exercise of
Common Stock options of $1.1 million. As part of the transaction, $6.0 million
was advanced to an ACL affiliate. This was subsequently repaid in February of
2003.

Net cash used in investing activities was $6.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2001 and was comprised principally of activity in investment
securities.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $36.0 million for the year
ended December 31, 2003 and was comprised of $40.0 million of borrowings under
the bridge financing agreement related to the Covanta acquisition less $4.0
million of repayments paid to NAICC. DHC borrowed $4.0 million from NAICC in
2001 at an interest rate of 6%. The loan was scheduled to be repaid in 2004, but
was repaid early, in February 2003.

INSURANCE SERVICES

DHC's insurance subsidiaries require both readily liquid assets and
adequate capital to meet ongoing obligations to policyholders and claimants, as
well as to pay ordinary operating expenses. NAICC meets both its short-term and
long-term liquidity requirements through operating cash flows that include
premium

29

receipts, investment income and reinsurance recoveries. To the extent operating
cash flows do not provide sufficient cash flow, NAICC relies on the sale of
invested assets. NAICC's investment policy guidelines require that all net
policyholder liabilities be matched by a comparable amount of investment grade
assets. Management believes that NAICC has sufficient available resources to
meet its present capital needs.

Cash used in insurance operations was $23.2 million, $23.8 million and $3.9
million in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The trend is consistent with the
run-off of several lines of business and their respective run-off patterns,
primarily workers' compensation and commercial auto. Such negative cash flow
requires the sale of invested assets to meet obligations as they arise. Due to
premium growth during the first nine months of 2001, NAICC was able to meet its
short-term cash needs primarily through premium receipts.

The National Association of Insurance Commissioners provides minimum
solvency standards in the form of RBC requirements. The RBC model for property
and casualty insurance companies requires that companies are to report their RBC
ratios based on their statutory annual statements as filed with the regulatory
authorities. NAICC has calculated its RBC requirement under the RBC model and
believes that it has sufficient capital for its operations. Further, the NAIC
has developed the Insurance Regulatory Information System ("IRIS"). IRIS
identifies twelve ratios for property/casualty insurance companies. IRIS
specifies ranges of "usual values" for each ratio. Departure from the "usual
value" range on four or more ratios may lead to increased regulatory oversight
from individual state insurance commissioners. As a result of the losses
recognized in 2003 and 2002, NAICC expects that it will fail seven of those
regulatory ratios relating to loss development and surplus change. Two of the
failures relate strictly to loss development and two relate to surplus changes
and operating ratios caused by loss development incurred during 2003. The
remaining three ratio failures relate to reduction in writings, overall
investment yield and liabilities to liquid assets. The failure of such ratios
subjects NAICC to increased regulatory inquiry. Based on the differential
between reported surplus and the surplus level requiring further regulatory
action, NAICC believes that the failure of those ratios will not have a material
adverse impact on the operations of NAICC.

As noted above, ACL filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code. As a result, it was determined for statutory insurance accounting purposes
that NAICC's investment in ACL was fully impaired. At December 31, 2002, NAICC
recognized a statutory charge to its surplus of $7.4 million. This charge, when
combined with NAICC's underwriting results and investment losses reduced its
statutory surplus level below the Company Action Level of NAICC's RBC
calculation. In response to the above statutory condition, DHC repaid the $4.0
million note due May 2004 to NAICC, and further contributed $4.0 million to
NAICC to increase its statutory capital during February 2003. With permission
from the California Department of Insurance, these transactions were recorded at
December 31, 2002. As a condition to granting permission, the Department
required NAICC to obtain permission prior to entering into a loan with an
affiliate. After consideration for the $8.0 million noted above, NAICC's
reported capital and surplus as of December 31, 2002 was above the Company
Action Level of NAICC's RBC calculation. As noted above, DHC also contributed
$2.0 million to NAICC to increase its statutory capital in December 2003.

DHC's domestic insurance companies are regulated by the insurance
regulatory agencies of the states in which they are authorized to do business.
Many aspects of DHC's insurance business are subject to regulation. For example,
minimum capitalization must be maintained; certain forms of policies must be
approved before they may be offered; reserves must be established in relation to
the amounts of earned premiums and losses incurred; and, in some cases,
schedules of premium rates must be approved.

In compliance with state insurance laws and regulations, securities with a
fair value of approximately $43.4 million, $45.0 million and $45.0 million,
respectively, on each at December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively, were on
deposit with various states or governmental regulatory authorities. In addition,
at December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, investments with a fair value of $7.2
million, $6.4 million and $6.6 million, respectively, were held in trust or as
collateral under the terms of certain reinsurance treaties and letters of
credit.

30

NAICC'S INVESTMENTS

California and Montana insurance laws and regulations regulate the amount
and type of NAICC's investments. NAICC's investment portfolio is comprised
primarily of fixed maturities and is weighted heavily toward investment grade
short and medium term securities. See Notes 1 and 10 of the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.

The following table sets forth a summary of NAICC's investment portfolio at
December 31, 2003 (dollars in thousands):

Letters of Credit

NAICC pledges assets and posts letters of credit for the benefit of other
insurance companies they do business with in the event that NAICC is not able to
pay their reinsurers. NAICC had pledged assets of $7.2 million and had letters
of credit outstanding of $2.8 million at December 31, 2003.

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitment Summary

A summary of DHC's contractual commitments under debt and lease agreements
appears below.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

31

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Samuel Zell, the Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and
President of DHC, is the Chairman of Equity Group Investments, L.L.C. ("EGI").
Commencing April 15, 2003, EGI provides administrative services for DHC. These
services include financial, tax, accounting, SEC filings and related
administrative costs. DHC paid EGI $0.2 million for these services in 2003. ACL
was paid a fee of $0.1 million in 2003 for providing these services prior to
April 15, 2003.

Prior to and shortly after the acquisition of ACL, DHC shared certain
personnel and facilities with several affiliated and unaffiliated companies who
have certain common directors and officers, and certain expenses were allocated
among the various entities. Personnel costs were allocated based upon actual
time spent on DHC business. Costs relating to office space and equipment were
allocated based upon actual usage. Management believes the methodology used for
allocation is appropriate. Total expenses allocated to DHC from affiliated
entities were $1.8 million and $1.3 million for the years ended December 2002
and 2001, respectively.

As described in Note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements, SZ Investments, Third Avenue and Laminar provided the bridge
financing required for the Covanta acquisition. See Note 2 for terms and
conditions relating to this debt. Interest expense on this financing amounted to
$0.4 million in 2003.

In connection with the DHC Recapitalization of ACL described in Note 3 of
the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, DHC provided SZ Investments
unlimited demand registration rights with respect to the ACL Senior Notes and
ACL PIK Notes held by HY I Investments, L.L.C. ("HYI"), an affiliate of SZ
Investments. Mr. Zell and Mr. Tinkler, DHC's Chief Financial Officer, are
affiliated with SZ Investments and HYI. HYI is a holder of approximately 42% of
ACL's Senior Notes and PIK Notes. Mr. Pate, a member of DHC's Board of
Directors, is affiliated with SZ Investments and HYI and is an executive officer
of EGI. A special committee of DHC's Board of Directors composed solely of
disinterested directors oversees DHC's investment in ACL and related Chapter 11
bankruptcy proceedings.

On April 14, 1999, DHC entered into a non-exclusive investment advisory
agreement with EGI pursuant to which EGI agreed to provide, at the request of
DHC, certain investment banking services to DHC in connection with potential
transactions. For these services, in 2002, DHC paid a fee of $0.1 million to
EGI. The agreement provided that, in the event that a transaction was
consummated for which the Acquisition Committee of DHC's Board of Directors
determined that EGI provided material services, DHC would pay to EGI a fee in
the amount of 1% of the aggregate consideration in connection with such
transaction (including indebtedness assumed or outstanding). As a result of
services provided to DHC during the DHC Recapitalization of ACL, DHC and EGI
agreed that the fee for EGI's services was $3.0 million. DHC also agreed to
reimburse, upon request, EGI's out-of-pocket expenses related to services
provided under the investment advisory agreement. For providing a standby
commitment to purchase any DHC shares that were unsubscribed in the rights
offering conducted by DHC as part of its acquisition of ACL, DHC paid SZ
Investments a fee of $1.0 million. Messrs. Zell and Pate were members of the
Acquisition Committee at the time of the DHC Recapitalization of ACL, along with
Messrs. Whitman and Barse, all of whom are Directors of DHC. On December 1,
2003, DHC and EGI terminated this agreement.

COVANTA ACQUISITION

NOTE PURCHASE AGREEMENT

DHC obtained the financing necessary for the Covanta acquisition pursuant
to a note purchase agreement dated December 2, 2003, from the Bridge Lenders.
Pursuant to the note purchase agreement, the Bridge Lenders provided DHC with
$40.0 million of bridge financing in exchange for notes convertible under
certain circumstances into shares of Common Stock at a price of $1.53 per share.
These notes have a scheduled maturity date of January 2, 2005 and an extended
maturity date of July 15, 2005, and bear interest at a rate of 12% per annum
through July 15, 2004 and 16% per annum thereafter. In the event of a default or
the failure to pay a convertible note on its maturity, the interest rate under
the note increases by 2%.

32

In the event, that the issuance of shares of Common Stock under the notes
trigger certain ownership change limitations, as defined by the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, the terms of the convertible notes may be modified. In the event
of a non-ownership change rollover event (as defined in the note purchase
agreement), the notes will bear interest at 18% per annum, compounded quarterly
on the last day of each calendar quarter. In the event of an ownership change
rollover event (as defined in the note purchase agreement), amounts in excess
$8.0 million shall be subject to the non-ownership change rollover terms, unless
prepaid in full in cash. In the first year in which notes are outstanding under
the ownership change rollover terms, interest will be 12% per annum. Thereafter,
interest on the notes will be 14.5% per annum, calculated quarterly and payable
in arrears on the last day of each calendar quarter.

DHC used $30.0 million of the proceeds from the notes to post an escrow
deposit prior to the closing of the transactions contemplated by the investment
and purchase agreement. DHC amended the investment and purchase agreement as of
February 23, 2004 to reduce the purchase price by $175,000 and remove $175,000
from the purchase price escrow account so that DHC could acquire an equity
interest in Covanta Lake, Inc., a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of Covanta in
a transaction separate and distinct from the acquisition of Covanta out of
bankruptcy. The purchase of the equity interests of Covanta was completed on
March 10, 2004, at which time the escrowed purchase price funds were delivered
to Covanta and used as DHC's purchase price for Covanta's equity interests. DHC
has used and will use the proceeds from the sales of the bridge notes to pay
transaction expenses and for general corporate purposes. In this regard, DHC has
agreed to pay up to $0.9 million to the Bridge Lenders as reimbursement for
expenses incurred by them in connection with the note purchase agreement.

In consideration for the $40.0 million of bridge financing, the agreement
by the Bridge Lenders to arrange or provide for the second lien letter of credit
facility and for Laminar to arrange or provide for the Covanta Power
International Holding revolving credit facility, DHC issued to the Bridge
Lenders an aggregate of 5,120,853 shares of Common Stock. The Bridge Lenders are
bound to participate fully in the rights offering in respect of the rights
accruing pursuant to these shares of Common Stock.

DHC expects to refinance the notes through a previously announced rights
offering. If DHC does not refinance all of the outstanding notes, the remainder
of the notes would be convertible, without action on the part of the Bridge
Lenders, into shares of Common Stock at the rights offering price of $1.53 per
share, subject to agreed upon limitations necessitated by DHC's NOLs.

In addition, under the note purchase agreement, Laminar has agreed to
convert an amount of convertible notes to acquire up to an additional 8.75
million shares of Common Stock at $1.53 per share based upon the levels of
public participation in this rights offering. Further, as discussed below, DHC
has agreed, in connection with the note purchase agreement, to sell up to an
additional 3 million shares of Common Stock at $1.53 per share to certain
creditors of Covanta based upon the levels of public participation in this
rights offering and subject to change of ownership and other limitations.

The note purchase agreement provides for DHC to comply with certain
covenants including, among others:

- that DHC shall comply with all applicable laws, regulations, orders and
other requirements, and timely pay all taxes, pending the repayment or
conversion of the outstanding convertible notes;

- that DHC shall preserve its corporate existence and all rights and
franchises material to its business, pending the repayment or conversion
of the outstanding convertible notes; and

- that DHC shall pay each of the Bridge Lenders a cash extension fee in the
event that any of the notes are subject to ownership change rollover
terms.

The note purchase agreement further restricts, without a certain specified
percentage of consents being obtained from the Bridge Lenders, DHC's ability to,
among others:

- pay any dividends on or repurchase any of DHC's outstanding securities,
other than pursuant to employee benefit plans in the ordinary course of
DHC's business, including the payment of dividends using Common Stock,
other than pursuant to the planned rights offering;

33

- purchase or sell any material amount of assets, enter into a merger
transaction, liquidate or dissolve;

- incur any debt for borrowed money in an aggregate principal amount in
excess of $250,000, or incur liens on DHC property;

- amend DHC's organizational documents; and

- enter into any material transactions with affiliates.

All unpaid principal of and accrued interest on the convertible notes shall
become immediately due and payable in cash, in the event that DHC, any of DHC's
significant subsidiaries, or Covanta, commence or have commenced against
DHC/them:

- any voluntary proceeding under any provision relating to bankruptcy,
insolvency, reorganization, liquidation, or otherwise to the relief of
debtors or the readjustment of indebtedness;

- any general assignment for the benefit of creditors or a composition or
similar arrangement with such creditors; or

- the appointment of a receiver, trustee or similar judicial officer or
agent to take charge of or liquidate any of its property or assets.

A required majority of the Bridge Lenders shall have the right to declare
all or any portion of the unpaid principal of and accrued interest on the notes
immediately due and payable, subject to certain cure periods, in the event:

- DHC accelerates any its indebtedness due to a default for borrowed money
in excess of $5 million;

- a judgment or judgments are rendered against DHC that involves an amount
in excess of $5 million, to the extent not covered by insurance;

- any of DHC's representations or warranties or certain of DHC's covenants
contained in the note purchase agreement were untrue or incorrect in any
material respect as of the date of the note purchase agreement or other
specified date therein; or

- a change of control occurs, unless caused solely by the Bridge Lenders.

DHC TAX SHARING AGREEMENT

DHC and Covanta entered into a tax sharing agreement dated as of March 10,
2004, which determines Covanta's tax obligations with respect other members of
DHC's consolidated group for taxable years ending after the date of the tax
sharing agreement. The tax sharing agreement provides that up to $571 million of
NOLs are available to offset the future taxable income of Covanta, subject to
specified adjustments. If Covanta's actual tax liability for any taxable year is
higher than the liability to us determined under the tax sharing agreement, DHC
will have an obligation to indemnify Covanta for any such excess.

LAMINAR LETTER AGREEMENT

Pursuant to a letter agreement dated December 2, 2003, Laminar has agreed
to transfer restrictions on the shares of Common Stock that Laminar holds or
will acquire. In accordance with the transfer restrictions contained in Article
Fifth of DHC's charter restricting the resale of Common Stock by 5%
stockholders, DHC has agreed with Laminar that their ability to sell Common
Stock will be limited for a period of three years to the following amounts:

- up to 10% of DHC's outstanding shares for a period of one year following
March 10, 2004;

- up to an additional 5% of DHC's outstanding shares, or an aggregate of
15% of DHC's outstanding shares, during the period beginning one year
following March 10, 2004 and ending two years following March 10, 2004;

34

- up to an additional 5% of DHC's outstanding shares, or an aggregate of
20% of DHC's outstanding shares, during the period beginning two years
following March 10, 2004 and ending three years following March 10, 2004;
and

- no restrictions thereafter other than restrictions included in DHC's
certificate of incorporation.

In connection with this letter agreement, a special committee of
disinterested members of DHC's Board of Directors has determined that sales of
Common Stock in accordance to the foregoing limitations will not create an
unreasonable risk of an ownership change under Article Fifth of DHC's charter,
subject to confirmation at the time of such transfers by DHC's tax counsel.

REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT

Pursuant to a registration rights agreement dated as of December 2, 2003,
DHC has agreed with the Bridge Lenders to file, at DHC's expense, a registration
statement with the SEC to register the shares of Common Stock issued to them
under the note purchase agreement not later than the earlier of (i) June 30,
2004, and (ii) ten days after closing of this rights offering. The Bridge
Lenders were also granted certain "piggy-back" registration rights with respect
to such shares of Common Stock.

NEW COVANTA FINANCING

Domestic Facilities

Covanta has entered into two credit facilities to provide letters of credit
in support of its domestic operations. Specifically, Covanta has entered into a
letter of credit facility, secured by a first priority lien on Covanta's
domestic assets, consisting of commitments for the issuance of letters of credit
in the aggregate face amount of up to approximately $138 million with respect to
Covanta's Detroit facility. This first lien credit facility has a term of five
years, requires cash collateral to be posted for issued letters of credit and
bears interest at the rate of 3% over the Base Rate (being the higher of (i) the
prime rate or (ii) 0.5% in excess of the federal funds effective rate) on issued
letters of credit (increasing to 5% over the Base Rate in specified default
situations). Covanta also paid a 1% upfront fee (approximately $1.38 million)
upon entering into the first lien credit facility, and will pay with respect to
each issued letter of credit (i) a fronting fee equal to the greater of $500 and
0.25% per annum of the daily amount available to be drawn under such letter of
credit, (ii) a letter of credit fee equal to 2.5% per annum of the daily amount
available to be drawn under such letter of credit, and (iii) an annual fee of
$1,500.

Additionally, Covanta has entered into a letter of credit facility, secured
by a second priority lien on Covanta's domestic assets, consisting of
commitments for the issuance of standby letters of credit in the aggregate face
amount of up to $118 million. This second lien credit facility also provides for
up to $10 million in cash borrowings, on a revolving basis, by Covanta to fund
working capital requirements and for general corporate purposes. The amount
available for the issuance of standby letters of credit will be reduced by the
amount of outstanding loans under the revolving loan component. Among other
things, the second lien credit facility provides Covanta with the ability to
issue letters of credit as may be required with respect to various domestic
waste-to-energy facilities, including a new letter of credit in favor of the
Northeast Maryland Waste Disposal Authority in connection with the facility
operated by Covanta Montgomery, Inc. This second lien credit facility has a term
of five years. The letter of credit component of the second lien credit facility
requires cash collateral to be posted for issued letters of credit and bears
interest at the rate of 4.5% over the Base Rate on issued letters of credit
(increasing to 6.5% over the base rate in specified default situations). The
revolving loan component of the second lien credit facility bears interest at
either (i) 4.5% over the Base Rate or (ii) 6.5% over a formula Eurodollar rate,
the applicable rate to be determined by Covanta (increasing by 2% over the then
applicable rate in specified default situations). Covanta also paid an upfront
fee of $2.36 million upon entering into the second lien credit agreement, and
will pay (i) a commitment fee equal to 0.5% per annum of the daily calculation
of available credit, (ii) an annual agency fee of $30,000, and (iii) with
respect to each issued letter of credit an amount equal to 6.5% per annum of the
daily amount available to be drawn under such letter of credit.

35

Covanta has also entered into a domestic intercreditor agreement, with the
lenders under the domestic credit facilities and the trustee under the indenture
for the high yield notes discussed below, that sets forth, among other things,
provisions regarding the application of payments made by Covanta among the
lenders and certain matters relating to priorities upon the exercise of remedies
with respect to the collateral pledged under the loan documents.

Both domestic credit facilities provide for mandatory prepayments of all or
a portion of amounts funded by the lenders under letters of credit and the
revolving loan upon the occurrence of specified events. These events include
certain sales of assets, incurrence of additional indebtedness, availability of
annual cash flow, or cash on hand above certain base amounts, and change of
control transactions.

The terms of both domestic credit facilities require Covanta to comply with
certain covenants including, among others:

- that Covanta shall furnish the lenders with periodic financial, operating
and other information;

- that Covanta shall preserve its corporate existence and all rights and
franchises material to its business;

- that Covanta shall comply with all applicable laws, rules, regulations
and orders, and timely pay all taxes; and

- that Covanta shall obtain ratings of the high yield bonds discussed below
from Standard & Poor's Rating Group and/or Moody's Investors Service,
Inc.

The domestic credit facilities further restricts, without a certain
specified percentage of consents being obtained from the lenders, Covanta's
ability to, among others:

- incur indebtedness, or incur liens on its property, subject to specific
exceptions;

- pay any dividends on or repurchase any of its outstanding securities,
subject to specific exceptions;

- deviate from specified financial ratios and covenants, including those
pertaining to consolidated net worth, adjusted EBITDA, cash flow and
capital expenditures;

- sell any material amount of assets, enter into a merger transaction,
liquidate or dissolve;

- enter into any material transactions with shareholders and affiliates;

- amend its organization documents; and

- engage in a new line of business.

All unpaid principal of and accrued interest on the revolving loan, and an
amount equal to 105% of the maximum amount that may at any time be drawn under
outstanding letters of credit, shall become immediately due and payable in the
event that Covanta or certain of its affiliates (including DHC) become subject
to specified events of bankruptcy or insolvency. Such amounts shall also become
immediately due and payable, upon action taken by a certain specified percentage
of the lenders, in the event that any of the following occurs after the
expiration of applicable cure periods:

- a failure by Covanta to pay amounts due under the domestic credit
facilities or other debt instruments;

- breaches of representations, warranties and covenants under the domestic
credit facilities;

- a judgment or judgments are rendered against Covanta that involve an
amount in excess of $5 million, to the extent not covered by insurance;

- any event that has caused a material adverse effect on Covanta;

- a change in control;

- the domestic intercreditor agreement or any security agreement ceases to
be in full force and effect;

- certain terminations of material contracts; or

36

- any securities issuance or equity contribution which is reasonably
expected to have a material adverse effect on the availability of net
operating losses.

International Facilities

Covanta Power International Holdings, Inc. ("Covanta Power International"),
a subsidiary of Covanta, and each of its subsidiaries, including certain
domestic entities holding the equity interests in Covanta's foreign operations,
which holds the assets and operations of Covanta's international independent
power production business, entered into two credit facilities: a new revolving
credit facility secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of Covanta
Power International's assets, junior only to duly perfected and unavoidable
prior liens, consisting of commitments for cash borrowings of up to $10 million
for purposes of supporting the international independent power production
business, and a term loan facility of up to $95 million secured by a second
priority lien on substantially all of Covanta Power International's assets,
junior only to duly perfected and unavoidable prior liens, including the lien
with respect to the new Covanta Power International revolving credit facility.

The Covanta Power International revolving credit facility has a maturity
date of three years following execution and bears interest at the rate of either
(i) 7% over the Base Rate or (ii) 8% over a formula Eurodollar rate, the
applicable rate to be determined by Covanta Power International (increasing by
2% over the then applicable rate in specified default situations). Covanta Power
International also paid a 2% upfront fee ($200,000) upon entering into the
international revolving credit facility, and will pay (i) a commitment fee equal
to 0.5% per annum of the daily calculation of available credit, and (ii) an
annual agency fee of $30,000.

The Covanta Power International term loan is in the original aggregate
principal amount of $90 million, subject to adjustment, with a maturity date of
three years following execution, and bears interest at 10.5%, 6.0% of such
interest to be paid in cash and the remaining 4.5% to be paid in cash to the
extent available and otherwise payable by adding it to the outstanding principal
balance. The interest rate increases to 12.5% in specified default situations.

Covanta Power International has also entered into the international
intercreditor agreement with the lenders under the Covanta Power International
revolving credit facility and the Covanta Power International term loan and with
Covanta, that sets forth, among other things, provisions regarding the
application of payments made by Covanta Power International among the respective
lenders and Covanta and matters relating to the exercise of remedies with
respect to the collateral pledged under the loan documents, and pursuant to
which Covanta will be entitled to reimbursements of operating expenses made on
behalf of the Covanta Power International and payments made with respect to
various parent guarantees being retained on behalf of Covanta Power
International.

The mandatory prepayment provisions, affirmative covenants, negative
covenants and events of default under the two international credit facilities
are similar to those found in the two domestic credit facilities.

Reorganization Plan Notes

The material terms of the reorganization plan notes are as follows:

New High Yield Secured Notes

Covanta has issued new high yield secured notes at a discount in an
aggregate principal amount of $205 million accreting 1.7% annually to an
aggregate principal amount of $230 million upon maturity seven years after
Covanta's emergence from bankruptcy. Interest will be paid semi-annually in
arrears on the principal amount of the outstanding high yield secured notes at a
rate of 8.25% per annum. The high yield secured notes will be secured by a third
priority lien on Covanta's domestic assets. In addition, all or part of the high
yield notes are pre-payable by Covanta at par of 100% of the accreted value
during the first two years and at a premium starting at 104.625% of par and
decreasing during the remainder of the term of the high yield notes. There are
no mandatory sinking fund provisions. Upon the occurrence of a change of control
event

37

and certain sales of assets, Covanta is obligated to offer to repurchase all or
any part of the high yield notes at 101% of par on the accreted value.

The indenture, dated as of March 10, 2004, relating to the high yield notes
requires Covanta to comply with certain covenants, including among others:

- restrictions on the payment of dividends, the repurchase of stock, the
incurrence of indebtedness and liens and the repayment of subordinated
debt, unless certain specified financial and other conditions are met;

- restrictions on the sale of certain material amounts of assets or
securities, unless certain specified conditions are met;

- restrictions on material transactions with affiliates;

- limitations on engaging in new lines of business; and

- preserving its corporate existence and its material rights and
franchises.

The high yield notes shall become immediately due and payable in the event
that Covanta or certain of its affiliates become subject to specified events of
bankruptcy or insolvency, and shall become immediately due and payable, upon
action taken by the trustee under the indenture or holders of a certain
specified percentage of principal under outstanding high yield notes, in the
event that any of the following occurs after expiration of applicable cure
periods:

- a failure by Covanta to pay amounts due under the high yield notes or
certain other debt instruments;

- a judgment or judgments are rendered against Covanta that involve an
amount in excess of $10 million, to the extent not covered by insurance;
and

- a failure by Covanta to comply with its obligations under the indenture

Unsecured Indenture and Notes Covanta has authorized the issuance of up to
$50 million in principal of unsecured global notes to certain creditors of
Covanta under an indenture with a maturity date of eight years after Covanta's
emergence from bankruptcy. Interest will be payable semi-annually at a rate of
7.5%. Annual amortization payments of approximately $3.9 million, paid at the
end of the year, will be paid beginning in year two, with the balance due on
maturity. The unsecured notes are subordinated in right of payment to all senior
indebtedness including, the first lien letter of credit facility, the second
lien letter of credit facility, the new high yield secured notes, and any other
indebtedness of Covanta with a principal amount of up to $50 million that is
designated by its express terms to be senior to the unsecured notes. The
unsecured notes will otherwise rank equally with, or be senior to, all other
indebtedness of Covanta. There are no mandatory sinking fund provisions and
Covanta may redeem the unsecured notes at any time without penalty or premium.
Upon the occurrence of a change of control event and certain sales of assets,
Covanta is obligated to offer to repurchase all or any part of the unsecured
notes at 101% of par on the accreted value.

The indenture, dated as of March 10, 2004, relating to the unsecured notes
requires Covanta to comply with certain covenants, including among others:

- restrictions on the payment of dividends, the repurchase of stock, the
incurrence of indebtedness and liens and the repayment of subordinated
debt, unless certain specified financial and other conditions are met;

- restrictions on the sale of certain material amounts of assets or
securities, unless certain specified conditions are met;

- restrictions on material transactions with affiliates; and

- preserving its corporate existence and its material rights and
franchises.

The unsecured yield notes shall become immediately due and payable in the
event that Covanta or certain of its affiliates become subject to specified
events of bankruptcy or insolvency, and shall become

38

immediately due and payable, upon action taken by the trustee under the
indenture or holders of a certain specified percentage or principal under
outstanding unsecured notes, in the event that any of the following occurs after
expiration of applicable cure periods:

- a failure by Covanta to pay amounts due under the high yield notes or
certain other debt instruments; and

- a failure by Covanta to comply with its obligations under the indenture.

CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, "Accounting for Certain
Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity"
("SFAS 150"). SFAS 150 requires that certain financial instruments, which under
previous guidance were accounted for as equity, must now be accounted for as
liabilities. The financial instruments affected include mandatorily redeemable
stock, certain financial instruments that require or may require the issuer to
buy back some of its shares in exchange for cash or other assets, and certain
obligations that can be settled with shares of stock. SFAS 150 is effective for
financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, otherwise it
is effective July 1, 2003, the beginning of the first interim period after June
15, 2003. The provisions of this statement did not have an impact on DHC's
financial statements in 2003.

In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation 46, Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of ARB No. 51 (FIN 46). In
December 2003, the FASB modified FIN 46 to make certain technical corrections
and address certain implementation issues that had arisen, including deferral of
certain provisions to 2004. FIN 46 provides a new framework for identifying
variable interest entities ("VIEs") and determining when a company should
include the assets, liabilities, noncontrolling interests and results of
activities of a VIE in its consolidated financial statements. FIN 46 was
effective immediately for VIEs created after January 31, 2003. The provisions of
this statement did not have an impact on DHC's financial statements in 2003. DHC
does not expect FIN46 will have a significant impact on its financial statements
in 2004.

In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146 "Accounting for Costs Associated
with Exit or Disposal Activities" ("SFAS 146"), which addresses financial
accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities
and nullifies EITF Issue No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee
Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain
Costs incurred in a Restructuring)" ("Issue 94-3"). The principal difference
between SFAS 146 and Issue 94-3 relates to SFAS 146's requirements for
recognition of a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal
activity. SFAS 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit
or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. Under Issue
94-3, a liability for an exit cost as generally defined in Issue 94-3 was
recognized at the date of an entity's commitment to an exit plan. Severance pay
under SFAS 146, in many cases, would be recognized over time rather than up
front. Additionally, under SFAS 146, if the benefit arrangement requires
employees to render future service beyond a "minimum retention period," a
liability should be recognized as employees render service over the future
service period even if the benefit formula used to calculate an employee's
termination benefit is based on length of service. The provisions of SFAS 146,
which was adopted in 2003, did not have an impact on DHC's financial statements
in 2003.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

INSURANCE SERVICES

RISK RELATED TO THE INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO

NAICC's objectives in managing its investment portfolio are to maximize
investment income and investment returns while minimizing overall credit risk.
Investment strategies are developed based on many factors including underwriting
results, overall tax position, regulatory requirements, and fluctuations in
interest rates. Investment decisions are made by management, in consultation
with independent investment advisors, and approved by the Board of Directors.
Market risk represents the potential for loss due to adverse changes in the fair
value of securities. The market risks related to NAICC's fixed maturity
portfolio are primarily credit
39

risk, interest rate risk, reinvestment risk and prepayment risk. The market risk
related to NAICC's equity portfolio is price risk.

FIXED MATURITIES

Interest rate risk is the price sensitivity of fixed maturities to changes
in interest rate. Management views these potential changes in price within the
overall context of asset and liability matching. Management estimates the payout
patterns of NAICC's liabilities, primarily loss reserves, to determine their
duration. Management sets duration targets for the fixed income portfolio after
consideration of the duration of NAICC's liabilities that it believes mitigates
the overall interest rate risk. NAICC's exposure to interest rate risk is
mitigated by the relative short-term nature of its insurance and other
liabilities. The effective duration of the portfolio at December 31, 2003 and
2002 was 2.3 years and 2.7 years, respectively. Management believes its
portfolio duration is appropriate given the relative short-tail nature of the
automobile programs and projected run-off of all lines of business. A
hypothetical 100 basis point increase in market rates would cause an approximate
2.3% decrease in the fair value of the portfolio while a hypothetical 100 basis
point decrease would cause an approximate 2.3% increase in fair value. Credit
risk is the price sensitivity of fixed maturities to changes in the credit
quality of such investment. NAICC's exposure to credit risk is mitigated by its
investments in high quality fixed income alternatives.

Fixed maturities of NAICC include Mortgage-Backed Securities ("MBS")
representing 22.0% and 33.6% of total fixed maturities at December 31, 2003 and
December 31, 2002, respectively. All MBS held by NAICC are issued by the Federal
National Mortgage Association ("FNMA") or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation ("FHLMC"), which are both rated AAA by Moody's Investors Services.
Both FNMA and FHLMC are corporations that were created by Acts of Congress. FNMA
and FHLMC guarantee the principal balance of their securities. FNMA guarantees
timely payment of principal and interest.

One of the risks associated with MBS is the timing of principal payments on
the mortgages underlying the securities. The principal an investor receives
depends upon amortization schedules and the termination pattern (resulting from
prepayments or defaults) of the individual mortgages included in the underlying
pool of mortgages. The principal is guaranteed but the yield and cash flow can
vary depending on the timing of the repayment of the principal balance. The
degree to which a security is susceptible to changes in yield is influenced by
the difference between its amortized cost and par, the relative sensitivity to
repayment of the underlying mortgages backing the securities in a changing
interest rate environment, and the repayment priority of the securities in its
overall securitization structure. NAICC attempts to limit repayment risk by
purchasing MBS whose cost is below or does not significantly exceed par, and by
primarily purchasing structured securities with repayment protection which
provides more certain cash flow to the investor such as MBS with sinking fund
schedules known as Planned Amortization Classes ("PAC") and Targeted
Amortization Classes ("TAC"). The structures of PAC's and TAC's attempt to
increase the certainty of the timing of prepayment and thereby minimize the
prepayment and interest rate risk. In 2003, NAICC recognized $1.0 million in
gain on sales of fixed maturities.

MBS, as well as callable bonds, have a greater sensitivity to market value
declines in a rising interest rate environment than to market value increases in
a declining interest rate environment. This is primarily due to the ability and
the incentive of the payor to prepay the principal or the issuer to call the
bond in a declining interest rate scenario. NAICC realized significant increases
in its prepayments of principal during 2003 and 2002. The prepayments mitigated
the need to sell securities to meet operating cash requirements as noted above.
Generally, this trend will lower the portfolio yield in future years in a
declining interest environment.

40

MBS instruments are described in tabular format below:

MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES

The following table provides information about NAICC's fixed maturity
investments at December 31, 2003 that are sensitive to changes in interest
rates. The table presents expected cash flows of principal amounts and related
weighted average interest rate by expected maturity dates. The expected maturity
date for other than MBS is the earlier of call date or maturity date or for MBS
is based on expected payment patterns. Actual cash flows could differ from
expected amounts considering the weighting of NAICC's portfolio towards MBS. As
interest rates at December 31, 2003 are at 40-year lows, NAICC is subject to
reinvestment risk as approximately 32% of its fixed maturity portfolio will be
received in the following year. Absent changing its credit risk profile, it is
unlikely that NAICC could reinvest proceeds at yields similar to those
recognized in 2003.

FIXED MATURITIES

EXPECTED CASH FLOWS OF PRINCIPAL AMOUNTS

EQUITY SECURITIES

During 2001, NAICC reduced its equity portfolio by liquidating almost all
of its position in foreign securities. The proceeds from the sale of these
securities were used to increase NAICC's fixed maturity portfolio by purchasing
$9.2 million of ACL Senior Notes. In May 2002, the ACL Senior Notes, with a fair
value of $14.5 million, were converted into equity of ACLines LLC as part of the
DHC Recapitalization of ACL announced in January 2002 and consummated on May 29,
2002 (as described in Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).
On January 31, 2003, ACL filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code.

During 2002, NAICC increased its equity portfolio. At December 31, 2002,
NAICC had $6.6 million invested in its equity portfolio.

In the fourth quarter of 2003, NAICC sold nearly all of its equity
investments capitalizing on the general stock market recovery and specifically
the technology sector. In 2003, $0.04 million was recognized as net realized
gains from equity investments.

41

ECONOMIC CONDITIONS

The operating results of a property and casualty insurer are influenced by
a variety of factors including general economic conditions, competition,
regulation of insurance rates, weather, and frequency and severity of losses.
The California non-standard personal auto market in which NAICC operates has
experienced a recovery of rate adequacy coupled with decreased competition.

The competition, rate regulation and loss experience in the California
automobile markets are currently such that, despite the difficulties in these
lines during 2002, NAICC was successful in writing in the state profitably for
2003. During 2002, NAICC recognized an increase in the frequency of losses for
its non-standard private passenger automobile line, and also higher than
expected adverse loss experience prior accident years in its commercial
automobile line. During 2001, the competition, rate regulation and loss
experience in the non-California automobile markets were such that NAICC was not
able to write in those states profitably, and as a result, exited those markets.

The California workers' compensation market, where NAICC had historically
written a significant amount of its premium, continues to be very price
competitive. Workers' compensation premium volume in 2001, prior to the decision
to exit the market, decreased slightly as competitors began to raise rates
during 2001. Despite those rate increases, NAICC believed that competitors
continued to price policies at rates below a level necessary to achieve an
underwriting profit. Coupled with an industry-wide increase in adverse loss
experience, NAICC believes that its decision to exit the workers' compensation
line was warranted under these economic conditions.

42

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
43

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
44

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION -- (CONTINUED)
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
45

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
46

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.

47

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

NOTE 1. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Danielson Holding Corporation ("DHC") is a holding company whose
subsidiaries consist principally of insurance operations in the western United
States, primarily California, and American Commercial Lines LLC ("ACL"), an
integrated marine transportation and service company. ACL provides barge
transportation and ancillary services throughout the inland United States and
Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Systems, which include the Mississippi, Ohio and
Illinois Rivers and their tributaries and the Intracoastal canals that parallel
the Gulf Coast. In addition, ACL provides barge transportation services on the
Orinoco River in Venezuela and the Parana/Paraguay River System serving
Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay and Bolivia. ACL, through its subsidiary
Jeffboat LLC, also provides marine construction and repair services.

DHC holds all of the voting stock of DHC Indemnity Company ("DIND"). DIND
owns 100 % of the common stock of National American Insurance Company of
California, DHC's principal operating insurance subsidiary, which owns 100% of
the common stock of Valor Insurance Company, Incorporated ("Valor") (National
American Insurance Company of California and its subsidiaries being collectively
referred to as "NAICC").

The operations of NAICC are in property and casualty insurance. NAICC
writes non-standard private passenger and commercial automobile insurance in the
western United States, primarily California. NAICC writes approximately 92% of
its insurance in California. For the years ended December 2003, 2002 and 2001,
55%, 45% and 16%, respectively, of total direct written premiums were produced
through two general agents of NAICC. In 2001, NAICC, which formerly wrote
workers' compensation insurance, decided to exit the workers' compensation
business in all states. In 2003, NAICC ceased writing new commercial automobile
insurance and expects that by September 2004 it will have completely exited the
commercial automobile insurance market.

ACL, which was acquired on May 29, 2002, and certain of its subsidiaries,
filed a petition on January 31, 2003 with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Indiana, New Albany Division to reorganize under Chapter 11
of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. As a result of this filing, while DHC continues to
exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of ACL,
it no longer maintains control of the activities of ACL. Accordingly, DHC no
longer includes ACL and its subsidiaries as consolidated subsidiaries in DHC's
financial statements. DHC's investments in these entities are presented using
the equity method effective as of the beginning of the year ending December 31,
2003. DHC has direct ownership interest in two 50% owned subsidiaries of ACL. It
owns 5.4% of the remaining 50% interest in Global Materials Services, LLC
("GMS") and the remaining 50% interest in Vessel Leasing, LLC ("Vessel
Leasing"). These direct ownership interests are also reported using the equity
method of accounting since DHC has the ability to exercise significant influence
over the operating and financial policies of these companies. Under the equity
method of accounting, DHC reports its share of ACL's, GMS's, and Vessel
Leasing's ("Investees") income and loss for the period based on its ownership
interest. DHC, GMS and Vessel Leasing are not guarantors of ACL's debt nor are
they liable for any of ACL's liabilities. Accordingly, under the equity method
of accounting, DHC does not recognize ACL's losses in excess of the investment
in ACL.

DHC's insurance subsidiaries are referenced to herein as "Insurance
Services". ACL, GMS and Vessel Leasing are together referenced to herein as
"Marine Services".

In 2003, DHC changed the presentation of the parent company's accounts
included in the consolidated statement of financial position from a classified
to an unclassified basis. The change in classification is deemed to be more
meaningful as DHC's Insurance Services' assets and liabilities have been
consistently reported on an unclassified basis. Previously reported amounts have
been reclassified to conform to the current classifications.
48

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

The consolidated financial statements reflect the results of operations,
cash flows and financial position of DHC and its majority-owned and controlled
subsidiaries as a single entity. All significant intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated. Investments in companies that are not
majority-owned or controlled are accounted for under the equity method.

FISCAL YEAR

In 2002, DHC conformed its previous calendar year-end reporting basis to
ACL's fiscal year-end reporting basis. Effective with the fiscal year beginning
December 28, 2002, DHC is again reporting on a calendar year-end basis to
conform with DIND and its consolidated subsidiaries' who have been consolidated
in the accompanying consolidated financial statements using its calendar
year-end reporting period in all periods presented. The transition period
activity included in the consolidated financial statements for 2003 is
immaterial.

USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

Cash and cash equivalents include short-term investments with a maturity of
less than three months when purchased. DHC, from time to time, has cash in banks
in excess of federally insured limits. Cash and cash equivalents are stated at
cost, which approximates fair value.

INVESTMENTS

Debt and equity securities can be classified in one of the three
categories: trading, available-for-sale, or held-to-maturity. Securities that
are classified as "trading" can be classified as bought and held principally to
sell in the near term. Securities which are classified as "held-to-maturity" are
securities which DHC has the ability and intent to hold until maturity. All
other securities, which are not classified as either trading or held-
to-maturity, are classified as "available-for-sale." DHC currently classifies
all of its debt and equity securities as available-for-sale.

Fixed maturities classified as available-for-sale are recorded at fair
value. Premiums and discounts of fixed maturity securities are amortized or
accreted based on the effective interest method. Amortization and accretion of
premiums and discounts on collateralized mortgage obligations are adjusted for
principal paydowns and changes in expected maturities. Net unrealized gains or
losses on fixed maturities classified as available-for-sale are excluded from
earnings and are reported as a separate component of accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders' equity until realized.

Equity securities are stated at fair value, and any increase or decrease
from cost is reported as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in
stockholders' equity as unrealized gain or loss until realized.

Any decline in the market value of any available-for-sale security or
held-to-maturity security below cost which is deemed to be "other than
temporary" is written down to fair value, resulting in losses that are included
in realized investment gains and losses. A new cost basis is established for
such security. Dividend

49

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

and interest income is recognized when earned. Investment gains or losses
realized on the sale of securities are determined using the specific
identification method.

DEFERRED POLICY ACQUISITION COSTS

Insurance Services' deferred policy acquisition costs, consisting
principally of commissions and premium taxes paid at the time of issuance of the
insurance policy, are deferred and amortized over the period during which the
related insurance premiums are earned. Deferred policy acquisition costs are
limited to the estimated future profit, based on the anticipated losses and loss
adjustment expenses ("LAE") (based on historical experience), maintenance costs,
policyholder dividends, and anticipated investment income. Deferred policy
acquisition costs of $833 at December 2003 and $1,612 at December 2002 are
included with other assets under Parent Company and Insurance Services. The
amortization of deferred acquisition costs charged to operations in 2003, 2002
and 2001 was $6,610, $11,437 and $16,174, respectively.

DEFERRED FINANCING COSTS

DHC recorded $7,169 of deferred financing costs in connection with the note
purchase agreement described in Note 2. These costs are being amortized over the
expected period that the bridge financing will be outstanding. Amortization for
2003 was $1,024 and is included in interest expense on the consolidated
statement of operations.

UNPAID LOSSES AND LOSS ADJUSTMENT EXPENSES

Unpaid losses and LAE are based on estimates of reported losses and
historical experience for incurred but unreported claims, including losses
reported by other insurance companies for reinsurance assumed, and estimates of
expenses for investigating and adjusting all incurred and unadjusted claims.
Management believes that the provisions for unpaid losses and LAE are adequate
to cover the cost of losses and LAE incurred to date. However, such liability
is, by necessity, based upon estimates, which may change in the near term, and
there can be no assurance that the ultimate liability will not exceed, or even
materially exceed, such estimates. The loss and LAE is continually monitored and
reviewed, and as settlements are made or reserves adjusted, differences are
included in current operations.

REINSURANCE

In the normal course of business, Insurance Services seeks to reduce the
loss that may arise from catastrophes or other events which cause unfavorable
underwriting results by reinsuring certain levels of risk in various areas of
exposure with other insurance enterprises or reinsurers.

Insurance Services accounts for its reinsurance contracts which provide
indemnification by reducing earned premiums for the amounts ceded to the
reinsurer and establishing recoverable amounts for paid and unpaid losses and
LAE ceded to the reinsurer. Amounts recoverable from reinsurers are estimated in
a manner consistent with the claim liability associated with the reinsured
policy. Contracts that do not result in the reasonable possibility that the
reinsurer may realize a significant loss from the insurance risk generally do
not meet conditions for reinsurance accounting and are accounted for as
deposits. For the fiscal years 2003 and 2002, Insurance Services had no
reinsurance contracts which were accounted for as deposits.

EARNED PREMIUMS

Insurance Services' earned premium income is recognized ratably over the
contract period of an insurance policy. A liability is established for unearned
insurance premiums that represent the portion of premium received which is
applicable to the remaining portion of the unexpired terms of the related
policies.

50

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

Reinsurance premiums are accounted for on a basis consistent with those used in
accounting for the original policies issued and the terms of the reinsurance
contracts.

NAICC establishes an allowance for premium receivables and reinsurance
recoverables through a charge to general and administrative expenses based on
historical experience. After all collection efforts have been exhausted, NAICC
reduces the allowance for balances that have been deemed uncollectible.

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION COSTS

Stock-based compensation cost is measured using the intrinsic value based
method of accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25
"Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" ("APB 25"), and related
interpretations for directors and employees. The fair value based method of
accounting prescribed by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS")
No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," ("SFAS 123"), is used to
measure stock-based compensation for contractors.

In December 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued
SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and
Disclosure," ("SFAS 148"), which provides alternative methods of transition for
a voluntary change to the fair value method of accounting for stock-based
employee compensation. In addition, the statement amends the disclosure
requirements of SFAS 123 to require prominent disclosures about the method of
accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method
used on reported financial results and requires such disclosures in interim
financial information. DHC continues to account for stock-based employee
compensation under APB 25 for directors and employees, but has adopted the new
disclosure requirements of SFAS 148.

The following table illustrates the pro forma effect on net loss and loss
per share as if the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 had been
applied to all stock-based compensation awards.

Additional information related to DHC's stock option plan is detailed in
Note 15.

INCOME TAXES

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax
consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and the respective tax basis
thereof. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax
rates which are expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those
temporary differences are anticipated to be recovered or settled, and are
limited, through a valuation allowance, to the amount estimated to be
realizable.

PER SHARE DATA

Per share data is based on the weighted average number of shares of common
stock of DHC, par value $0.10 per share ("Common Stock"), outstanding during the
relevant period. Basic earnings per share are

51

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

calculated using only the average number of outstanding shares of Common Stock.
Such average shares were 30,783,216, 26,258,499, and 19,465,104 for the years
2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Diluted earnings per share computations, as
calculated under the treasury stock method, include the average number of shares
of additional outstanding Common Stock issuable for stock options and warrants,
whether or not currently exercisable. Diluted earnings per share for all periods
presented do not include average shares related to stock options and warrants
because their effect is anti-dilutive.

RECLASSIFICATIONS

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current
year presentation.

OTHER SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES OF MARINE SERVICES

The following are other significant accounting policies of the previously
consolidated Marine Services subsidiaries.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts Receivable consist of the following as of December 27, 2002:

Accounts Receivable......................................... $53,129
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts............................. (2,346)
-------
$50,783
=======

Allowances for doubtful accounts are based upon the expected collectibility
of accounts.

Materials and Supplies

Materials and Supplies are carried at the lower of cost (average) or market
and consist of the following as of December 27, 2002:

Raw Materials............................................... $ 3,818
Work in Progress............................................ 15,577
Parts and Supplies.......................................... 15,379
-------
$34,774
=======

Properties

Properties are at cost and consist of the following as of December 27,
2002:

Land........................................................ $ 15,370
Buildings and Improvements.................................. 45,777
Equipment................................................... 649,572
--------
710,719
Less Accumulated Depreciation............................... 56,526
--------
$654,193
========

Provisions for depreciation of properties are based on the estimated useful
service lives computed on the straight-line method. Buildings and Improvements
are depreciated from 15 to 45 years. Equipment is depreciated from 5 to 42
years. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the

52

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

estimated useful lives of the assets or over the term of the leases, whichever
is shorter. Marine Services depreciation expense was $40,591 in 2002.

Properties and other long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever
events or business conditions indicate the carrying amount of such assets may
not be fully recoverable. Initial assessments of recoverability are based on
estimates of undiscounted future net cash flows associated with an asset or a
group of assets. Where impairment is indicated, the assets are evaluated for
sale or other disposition, and their carrying amount is reduced to fair value
based on discounted net cash flows or other estimates of fair value. There were
no long-lived asset impairment losses in 2002.

Investment in UABL

ACL accounts for its 50% ownership in UABL Limited and UABL Limited
Terminals Ltd. (collectively, "UABL"), companies with operations in South
America, by the equity method. Marine Services' share of UABL's losses included
in other income, net on the consolidated statement of operations was $1,130 for
2002.

Revenue Recognition

Marine Services' barge transportation revenue is recognized proportionately
as shipments move from origin to destination. Terminal, repair and other revenue
is recognized as services are provided. Marine construction revenue and related
expense is primarily recognized on the completed-contract method, due to the
short-term nature of contracts.

Debt Cost Amortization

Marine Services amortizes debt costs over the term of the debt.
Amortization expense was $1,150 in 2002.

Debt Discount Amortization

On May 29, 2002, ACL issued new debt which was recorded at fair value. The
difference between the principal amount of the notes and the fair value
(discount) is being amortized using the effective interest method over the life
of the notes. The amortization of the discount was $2,882 in 2002 and is
included in interest expense on the consolidated statement of operations.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, "Accounting for Certain
Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity"
("SFAS 150"). SFAS 150 requires that certain financial instruments, which under
previous guidance were accounted for as equity, must now be accounted for as
liabilities. The financial instruments affected include mandatorily redeemable
stock, certain financial instruments that require or may require the issuer to
buy back some of its shares in exchange for cash or other assets, and certain
obligations that can be settled with shares of stock. SFAS 150 is effective for
financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, otherwise it
is effective July 1, 2003, the beginning of the first interim period after June
15, 2003. The provisions of this statement did not have an impact on DHC's
financial statements in 2003.

In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation 46, "Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of ARB No. 51" ("FIN 46"). In
December 2003, the FASB modified FIN 46 to make certain technical corrections
and address certain implementation issues that had arisen, including deferral of
certain provisions to 2004. FIN 46 provides a new framework for identifying
variable interest entities ("VIEs") and determining when a company should
include the assets, liabilities, noncontrolling interests and results of
activities of a VIE in its consolidated financial statements. FIN 46 was
effective immediately for
53

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

VIEs created after January 31, 2003. The provisions of this statement did not
have an impact on DHC's financial statements in 2003. DHC does not expect FIN 46
will have a significant impact on its financial statements in 2004.

In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146 "Accounting for Costs Associated
with Exit or Disposal Activities" ("SFAS 146"), which addresses financial
accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities
and nullifies EITF Issue No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee
Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain
Costs incurred in a Restructuring)" ("Issue 94-3"). The principal difference
between SFAS 146 and Issue 94-3 relates to SFAS 146's requirements for
recognition of a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal
activity. SFAS 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit
or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. Under Issue
94-3, a liability for an exit cost as generally defined in Issue 94-3 was
recognized at the date of an entity's commitment to an exit plan. Severance pay
under SFAS 146, in many cases, would be recognized over time rather than up
front. Additionally, under SFAS 146, if the benefit arrangement requires
employees to render future service beyond a "minimum retention period," a
liability should be recognized as employees render service over the future
service period even if the benefit formula used to calculate an employee's
termination benefit is based on length of service. The provisions of SFAS 146,
which was adopted in 2003, did not have an impact on DHC's financial statements
in 2003.

NOTE 2. COVANTA ACQUISITION AND FINANCING AGREEMENTS

On December 2, 2003, DHC executed a definitive investment and purchase
agreement to acquire the energy and water businesses of Covanta Energy
Corporation ("Covanta") in connection with Covanta's emergence from Chapter 11
proceedings in bankruptcy. The primary components of the transaction are: (1)
the purchase by DHC of 100% of the equity of Covanta in consideration for a cash
purchase price of $30,000, and (2) agreement as to new revolving credit and
letter of credit facilities for Covanta's domestic and international operations,
provided by some of the existing Covanta lenders and a group of additional
lenders organized by DHC. DHC amended this Agreement with Covanta as of February
23, 2004 to reduce the purchase price and release $175 from an escrow account so
that DHC could acquire an equity interest in Covanta Lake, Inc., a wholly-owned
indirect subsidiary of Covanta, in a transaction separate and distinct from the
acquisition of Covanta out of bankruptcy.

As required by the investment and purchase agreement, Covanta filed a new,
alternative proposed plan of reorganization, a new, alternative proposed plan of
liquidation for specified non-core businesses, and an accompanying draft
disclosure statement, each reflecting the transactions contemplated under the
investment and purchase agreement, with the Bankruptcy Court.

Under the terms of the investment and purchase agreement, DHC will acquire
100% of Covanta's equity in consideration for $30,000 in cash. Other assets as
of December 31, 2003 include deferred acquisition costs of $979 incurred
primarily for legal and consulting fees directly related to the Covanta
acquisition, net of a $3,000 reimbursement of such costs from Covanta in
December 2003. As part of the investment and purchase agreement, DHC arranged
for a new $118,000 replacement letter of credit facility for Covanta, secured by
a second lien on Covanta's domestic assets. This financing is to be provided by
SZ Investments, L.L.C., a DHC shareholder ("SZ Investments"), Third Avenue
Trust, on behalf of Third Avenue Value Fund Series, a DHC shareholder ("Third
Avenue") and D. E. Shaw Laminar Portfolios, L.L.C., a creditor of Covanta and a
DHC shareholder ("Laminar"). In addition, in connection with a note purchase
agreement described below, Laminar also will arrange for a $10,000 revolving
loan facility for Covanta's international operations that DHC will acquire,
secured by Covanta's international assets.

54

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

FINANCING THE COVANTA ACQUISITION

DHC obtained the financing necessary for the Covanta acquisition pursuant
to a note purchase agreement dated December 2, 2003, from SZ Investments, Third
Avenue and Laminar (collectively, the "Bridge Lenders"). Pursuant to the note
purchase agreement, the Bridge Lenders have provided DHC with $40,000 of bridge
financing in exchange for notes convertible into shares of Common Stock, par
value $0.10 per share ("Common Stock") at a price of $1.53 per share. These
notes have a scheduled maturity date of January 2, 2005 and an extended maturity
date of July 15, 2005, and bear interest at a rate of 12% per annum through July
15, 2004 and 16% per annum thereafter. In the event of a default or the failure
to pay a note on its maturity, the interest rate under the note increases by 2%.
DHC used $30,000 of the proceeds from the notes to post an escrow deposit prior
to the closing of the transactions contemplated by the investment and purchase
agreement. Upon closing, it is intended that the deposit will be used as DHC's
purchase price for Covanta's equity interests. DHC will use the remainder of the
proceeds to pay unreimbursed transaction expenses and for general corporate
purposes. In consideration for the $40,000 of bridge financing and the agreement
by the Bridge Lenders to arrange or provide for the $118,000 second lien credit
facility and for Laminar to arrange or provide for the $10,000 international
revolving credit facility, DHC issued to the Bridge Lenders an aggregate of
5,120,853 shares of Common Stock. At the time that DHC entered into the note
purchase agreement, agreed to issue the notes convertible into shares of Common
Stock and issued the equity compensation to the Bridge Lenders, the closing
price of Common Stock on the day prior to the announcement of the Covanta
acquisition was $1.40 on the American Stock Exchange, which was below the $1.53
per share conversion price of the notes.

DHC expects to refinance the notes pursuant to a rights offering. If DHC
does not refinance all of the outstanding notes, the remainder of the notes
would be convertible into shares of Common Stock, without action by the Bridge
Lenders, at the rights offering price of $1.53 per share, subject to certain
agreed upon limitations necessitated by DHC's NOL's.

In addition, under the note purchase agreement, Laminar has agreed to
convert an amount of notes to acquire up to an additional 8.75 million shares of
the Common Stock at $1.53 per share based upon the levels of public
participation in the rights offering. Further, DHC has agreed, in connection
with the note purchase agreement, to sell up to an additional 3 million shares
of Common Stock at $1.53 per share to certain creditors of Covanta based upon
the levels of public participation in the rights offering and subject to change
of ownership and other limitations.

As part of DHC's negotiations with Laminar and their becoming a 5%
shareholder, pursuant to a letter agreement dated December 2, 2003, Laminar has
agreed to transfer restrictions on the shares of Common Stock that Laminar holds
or will acquire. Further, in accordance with the transfer restrictions contained
in Article Five of DHC's charter restricting the resale of Common Stock by 5%
stockholders, DHC has agreed with Laminar to provide it with limited rights to
resell the Common Stock that it holds. Finally, DHC has agreed with the Bridge
Lenders to file a registration statement with the SEC to register the shares of
Common Stock issued to them under the note purchase agreement not later than the
earlier of June 30, 2004 and ten days after closing of the rights offering.
Samuel Zell, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of
DHC, Philip G. Tinkler, Chief Financial Officer of DHC and William Pate, a
director of DHC, are affiliated with SZ Investments. Martin Whitman and David
Barse, directors of DHC, are affiliated with Third Avenue. The note purchase
agreement and other transactions involving the Bridge Lenders were negotiated,
reviewed and approved by a special committee of DHC's Board of Directors
composed solely of disinterested directors and advised by independent legal and
financial advisors.

NOTE 3. ACL ACQUISITION

On May 29, 2002, DHC completed an acquisition (the "DHC Recapitalization")
of American Commercial Lines Holdings LLC ("ACL Holdings"), the parent company
of ACL. Holders of ACL
55

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

Holdings' preferred units, exchanged all of their preferred units, other than
the preferred units held by the management unitholders, for $7,000 in cash from
DHC. DHC contributed to ACL Holdings $58,493, principal amount of ACL's 10.25%
senior notes due June 30, 2008 (the "Old Senior Notes"), plus the interest
obligations thereon, if any, and $25,000 in cash in exchange for newly issued
common units of ACL Holdings. All common units held by the common unitholders,
other than the consenting common unitholders, were cancelled and extinguished.
Members of ACL's management abandoned to ACL Holdings all preferred units of ACL
Holdings held by them for no consideration and all those preferred units were
deemed cancelled.

The fair value of the consideration given by DHC includes the $7,000 in
cash paid to preferred unitholders, cash of $25,000, the Old Senior Notes and
accrued interest having an estimated fair value of $43,650 contributed to ACL
Holdings and $6,606 in costs directly associated with the acquisition.

On May 29, 2002, DHC also purchased a 50% equity interest in Vessel Leasing
for $2,769 and a 5.4% equity interest in GMS for $1,290. Vessel Leasing leases
barges to ACL's barge transportation operations and GMS owns and operates
terminal and warehouse facilities.

The acquired companies operating results are included in DHC's consolidated
statement of operations from the date of the DHC Recapitalization, May 29, 2002.
A condensed consolidated balance sheet disclosing the amounts assigned to assets
and liabilities of the acquired companies at the date of the acquisition
follows:

ASSETS:
Current Assets............................................ $167,015
Property -- Net........................................... 662,141
Pension Assets............................................ 21,392
Other Assets.............................................. 74,584
--------
Total Assets...................................... 925,132
========
LIABILITIES:
Current Liabilities....................................... 197,796
Long-term Debt............................................ 612,958
Other Long-term Liabilities............................... 28,063
--------
Total Liabilities................................. 838,817
--------
Net Cost of Acquisitions.................................... $ 86,315
========

Following are the pro forma unaudited results of operations for the years
ended December 27, 2002 and December 31, 2001, assuming consummation of the
acquisitions and recapitalization of ACL Holdings as of January 1, 2001:

NOTE 4. ACL CHAPTER 11 FILING

During 2002 and 2003, ACL experienced a decline in barging rates, reduced
shipping volumes and excess barging capacity during a period of slow economic
growth. Due to these factors, ACL's revenues and earnings

56

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

did not meet expectations and ACL's liquidity was significantly impaired. Debt
covenant violations occurred and, as a result, ACL was unable to meet its
financial obligations as they became due. On January 31, 2003 (the "Petition
Date"), ACL filed a petition with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Indiana, New Albany Division (the "Bankruptcy Court") to reorganize
under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (the "Bankruptcy Code" or "Chapter
11") under case number 03-90305. Included in the filing are ACL, ACL's direct
parent (American Commercial Lines Holdings LLC), American Commercial Barge Line
LLC, Jeffboat LLC, Louisiana Dock Company LLC and ten other U.S. subsidiaries of
ACL (collectively with ACL, the "Debtors") under case numbers 03-90306 through
03-90319. These cases are jointly administered for procedural purposes before
the Bankruptcy Court under case number 03-90305. The Chapter 11 petitions do not
cover any of ACL's foreign subsidiaries or certain of its U.S. subsidiaries.

ACL and the other Debtors are continuing to operate their businesses as
debtors-in-possession under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in
accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and orders of
the Bankruptcy Court. As debtors-in-possession, the Debtors may not engage in
transactions outside of the ordinary course of business without approval, after
hearing, of the Bankruptcy Court. As part of the Chapter 11 cases, the Debtors
intend to develop and propose for confirmation pursuant to Chapter 11, a plan of
reorganization that will restructure the operations and liabilities of the
Debtors to the extent necessary to result in the continuing viability of ACL. A
filing date for such a plan has not been determined; however, the Debtors have
the exclusive right to file a plan of reorganization at any time on or before
March 28, 2004. If the exclusive filing period were to expire, other parties,
such as ACL creditors, would have the right to propose alternative plans of
reorganization. During the pendency of these Chapter 11 cases, the Debtors have
routinely requested extension of the exclusivity period. Such extensions have
been granted with the support of the Debtors' creditors. The Debtors intend to
file for an additional extension of the exclusivity period beyond the current
March 28, 2004 date, as may be necessary.

The Debtors' direct and indirect foreign subsidiaries and foreign joint
venture entities did not file petitions under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
and are not debtors-in-possession. DHC, GMS and Vessel Leasing also did not file
petitions under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code and are not
debtors-in-possession.

The Debtors have entered into a Revolving Credit and Guaranty Agreement
("DIP Credit Facility") that provides up to $75,000 of financing during ACL's
Chapter 11 proceeding. As of December 26, 2003, participating bank commitments
under the DIP Credit Facility total $75,000, consisting of a $50,000 term loan
and a $25,000 revolving credit facility. Of this amount, the Debtors have fully
drawn the $50,000 term loan, which was used to retire ACL's Pre-Petition
Receivables Facility and which continues to be used to fund the Debtors'
day-to-day cash needs. The Debtors have made no draws against the revolving
credit facility. Total amounts drawn under the DIP Credit Facility are limited
by a borrowing base (as defined in the DIP Credit Facility). The borrowing base
limit was $56,000 as of December 26, 2003 and is updated weekly. The DIP Credit
Facility is secured by the same and additional assets that collateralized ACL's
Senior Credit Facilities and Pre-Petition Receivables Facility, and bears
interest, at ACL's option, at London Inter Bank Offered Rates ("LIBOR or LIBOR
Rates") plus four percent or an Alternate Base Rate (as defined in the DIP
Credit Facility) plus three percent. There are also certain interest rates in
the event of a default under the facility.

The obligations of the Debtors under the DIP Credit Facility, by court
order, have super-priority administrative claim status as provided under the
Bankruptcy Code. Under the Bankruptcy Code, a super-priority claim is senior to
secured and unsecured pre-petition claims and all administrative expenses
incurred in the Chapter 11 case. In addition, with certain exceptions (including
a carve-out for unpaid professional fees and disbursements), the DIP Credit
Facility obligations are secured by (1) a first-priority lien on all
unencumbered pre- and post-petition property of the Debtors, (2) a
first-priority priming lien on all property of the Debtors that is encumbered by
the existing liens securing the Debtors' pre-petition secured lenders and (3) a
junior lien on all other property of the Debtors that is encumbered by the
pre-petition liens.

57

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

The DIP Credit Facility also contains certain restrictive covenants that,
among other things, restrict the Debtors' ability to incur additional
indebtedness or guarantee the obligations of others. ACL is also required to
maintain minimum cumulative EBITDA, as defined in the DIP Credit Facility, limit
its capital expenditures to defined levels and restrict advances to certain
subsidiaries.

The DIP Credit Facility will terminate and the borrowings there under will
be due and payable upon the earliest of (i) July 31, 2004 (with borrowings
repayable on August 2, 2004), (ii) the date of the substantial consummation of a
plan of reorganization that is confirmed pursuant to an order by the Bankruptcy
Court, or (iii) the acceleration of the term loans or the revolving credit loans
made by any of the banks who are a party to the DIP Credit Facility and the
termination of the total commitment under the DIP Credit Facility pursuant to
the DIP Credit Facility.

As a result of the Chapter 11 filings, certain events of default under
ACL's Senior Credit Facilities, Senior Notes, PIK Notes and Old Senior Notes
have occurred, the effects of which are stayed pursuant to certain provisions of
the Bankruptcy Code.

Under Chapter 11, actions by creditors to collect claims in existence at
the filing date are stayed or deferred absent specific Bankruptcy Court
authorization to pay such pre-petition claims while the Debtors continue to
manage their businesses as debtors-in-possession and act to develop a plan of
reorganization for the purpose of emerging from these proceedings. The Debtors
have received approval from the Bankruptcy Court to pay or otherwise honor
certain of its pre-petition obligations, including but not limited to employee
wages and certain employee benefits, certain critical vendor payments, certain
insurance and claim obligations and certain tax obligations as a plan of
reorganization is developed. A claims bar date of December 5, 2003 was
established for all other pre-petition creditors to file a claim against the
estate of the various debtors. The Debtors are currently in the process of
reviewing the claims that were filed against the Debtors. The ultimate amount of
claims allowed by the Court against the Debtors could be significantly different
than the amount of the liabilities recorded by the Debtors.

The amount of the claims to be filed against the Debtors by their creditors
could be significantly different than the amount of the liabilities recorded by
the Debtors. The Debtors also have numerous executory contracts and other
agreements that could be assumed or rejected during the Chapter 11 proceedings.
Parties affected by these rejections may file claims with the Bankruptcy Court
in accordance with the reorganization process. Under these Chapter 11
proceedings, the rights of and ultimate payments to pre-petition creditors,
rejection damage claimants and ACL's equity investor may be substantially
altered. This could result in claims being liquidated in the Chapter 11
proceedings at less (possible substantially less) than 100% of their face value,
and the membership interests of ACL's equity investor being diluted or
cancelled. The Debtors have not yet proposed a plan of reorganization. The
Debtors' pre-petition creditors and ACL's equity investor will each have a vote
in the plan of reorganization.

The Chapter 11 process presents inherent material uncertainty; it is not
possible to determine the additional amount of claims that may arise or
ultimately be filed, or predict the length of time that the Debtors will
continue to operate under the protection of Chapter 11, the outcome of the
Chapter 11 proceedings in general, whether the Debtors will continue to operate
in their present organizational structure, or the effects of the proceedings on
the business of ACL, the other Debtors and its non-filing subsidiaries and
affiliates, or on the interests of the various creditors and equity holder. The
ultimate recovery, if any, by creditors and DHC will not be determined until
confirmation of a plan or plans of reorganization. No assurance can be given as
to what value, if any, will be ascribed in the bankruptcy proceedings to each of
these constituencies. While it cannot be presently determined, DHC believes it
will receive little or no value with respect to its equity interest in ACL
Holdings or ACL. Accordingly, DHC wrote off its remaining investment in ACL at
the end of the first quarter of 2003 as an other than temporary asset impairment
(see Note 20).

58

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

NOTE 5. DEBT

DHC's debt as of December 31, 2003 consists of $40,000 in bridge financing
relating to the acquisition of Covanta. Pursuant to the note purchase agreement,
the Bridge Lenders provided DHC with bridge financing in exchange for notes
convertible under certain circumstances into shares of Common Stock at a price
of $1.53 per share. These notes have a scheduled maturity date of January 2,
2005 and an extended maturity date of July 15, 2005, and bear interest at a rate
of 12% per annum through July 15, 2004 and 16% per annum thereafter. In the
event of a default or the failure to pay a convertible note on its maturity, the
interest rate under the convertible note increases by 2%.

Under the note purchase agreement, Laminar has agreed to convert an amount
of convertible notes to acquire up to an additional 8.75 million shares of DHC
common stock at $1.53 per share based upon the levels of public participation in
a planned rights offering. DHC expects to repay the other notes through the
rights offering. If DHC does not refinance all of the other outstanding notes,
the remainder of the notes would be convertible, without action on the part of
the Bridge Lenders, into shares of Common Stock at the rights offering price of
$1.53 per share, subject to agreed upon limitations necessitated by DHC's NOLs.

In the event, that the issuance of shares of Common Stock under the
convertible notes trigger certain ownership change limitations, as defined by
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, the terms of the convertible notes may be
modified. In the event of a non-ownership change rollover event (as defined in
the agreement), the notes will bear interest at 18% per annum, compounded
quarterly on the last day of each calendar quarter. In the event of an ownership
change rollover event (as defined in the agreement), amounts in excess $8.0
million shall be subject to the non-ownership change rollover terms, unless
prepaid in full in cash. In the first year in which convertible notes are
outstanding under the ownership change rollover terms, interest will be 12% per
annum. Thereafter, interest on the notes will be 14.5% per annum, calculated
quarterly and payable in arrears on the last day of each calendar quarter.

The note purchase agreement restricts DHC's ability to, among other
covenants and restrictions: purchase or sell any material amount of assets,
enter into a merger transaction, liquidate or dissolve; incur any debt for
borrowed money in an aggregate principal amount in excess of $250, or incur
liens on DHC property; and enter into any material transactions with affiliates.

Marine Services' debt as of December 27, 2002 was as follows:

ACL:
Revolving Credit Facility................................. $41,000
Tranche A Term Loan....................................... 43,119
Tranche B Term Loan....................................... 124,141
Tranche C Term Loan....................................... 146,069
New Senior Notes.......................................... 128,491
Senior Subordinated Notes (PIK Notes)..................... 68,797
Old Senior Notes.......................................... 4,946
Other Notes............................................... 317
Vessel Leasing:
Bonds guaranteed by the Maritime Administration........... 37,740
GMS:
Revolving Credit Facility................................. 2,873
GMS Bank Note............................................. 33,652
Illinois Development Finance Authority.................... 5,325
Other Notes............................................... 794

59

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

GMSV:
IFC Note.................................................. 2,850
Other Notes............................................... 1,005
-------
641,119
Less short-term debt........................................ 43,873
Less, current portion long-term debt........................ 588,778
-------
Long-term debt.............................................. $ 8,468
=======

As part of the DHC Recapitalization, ACL's debt was restructured. ACL's
existing credit facility was amended and restated as of April 11, 2002 (the
amended and restated credit facilities are hereafter referred to as the "Senior
Credit Facilities") to, among other things, modify financial and restrictive
covenants thereunder, prepay $25,000 of term loans thereunder from the $25,000
in cash contributed by DHC and convert $50,000 of revolving credit loans
thereunder into a new tranche of term loans having an interest rate and other
terms substantially similar to the revolving credit loans under ACL's old senior
credit facility.

ACL also completed an exchange offer (the "Exchange Offer") for Old Senior
Notes, pursuant to which $284,500 or approximately 96.4%, of the principal
amount of the Old Senior Notes were tendered, with the $58,493 principal amount
of the Old Senior Notes contributed by DHC to ACL Holdings being deemed tendered
in the Exchange Offer. Holders of Old Senior Notes, who tendered their Old
Senior Notes pursuant to the Exchange Offer, received approximately $134,700
aggregate principal amount of new 11.25% senior notes ("New Senior Notes") and
approximately $112,900 aggregate principal amount of new 12% pay-in-kind senior
subordinated notes ("PIK Notes"). Following the consummation of the Exchange
Offer, a holder of $4,000 aggregate principal amount of the Old Senior Notes
exchanged such notes and accrued interest for approximately $2,400 of New Senior
Notes and approximately $2,000 of PIK notes as permitted by the indentures
governing the notes, following which $6,500 of the Old Senior Notes remained
outstanding.

ACL's debt was adjusted to fair value as of the date of the DHC
Recapitalization. The difference between the principal amount of the debt and
its fair value is being accreted as interest expense over the term of the debt
under the effective interest method.

ACL's revolving credit facility (the "Revolving Credit Facility"), which
provides for revolving loans and letters of credit not to exceed the aggregate
principal amount of $50,000, matures June 30, 2005, but each loan must be repaid
within one year. The Revolving Credit Facility bears interest at a rate equal to
LIBOR plus a margin based on ACL's performance. The interest rate as of December
27, 2002 ranged from 5.8125% to 6.0625%.

Tranche A of the Term Loans matures June 30, 2005. Tranche B of the Term
Loans matures June 30, 2006. Tranche C of the Term Loans matures June 30, 2007.
The Term Loans bear interest at a rate equal to LIBOR plus a margin based on
ACL's performance. The annual interest rates as of December 27, 2002 were:
Tranche A -6.0%, Tranche B -6.25% and Tranche C -6.5%.

The New Senior Notes are due January 1, 2008 and bear interest at an annual
rate of 11.25%, payable semi-annually. The PIK Notes are due July 1, 2008 and
bear interest at an annual rate of 12%. ACL has the option of issuing new PIK
Notes in lieu of paying cash interest on such notes each June 30 and December 31
until maturity. After 2 years from issuance, interest accretes at 13.5% per
annum if ACL elects to not pay the interest due in cash. The interest rate
remains 12% if the interest is paid in cash. The Old Senior Notes are due June
30, 2008 and bear interest at an annual rate of 10.25%.

In connection with the Exchange Offer, ACL completed a consent solicitation
of the holders of the Old Senior Notes, which resulted in the elimination or
amendment of substantially all the restrictive covenants contained in the
indenture governing the Old Senior Notes, the subordination of the subsidiary
guarantees of

60

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

the Old Senior Notes to the subsidiary guarantees of the Senior Credit
Facilities, the New Senior Notes and the PIK Notes and the waiver of any and all
defaults under the indenture governing the Old Senior Notes through the
effective date of the Exchange Offer, May 29, 2002.

The Senior Credit Facilities and the indentures governing the New Senior
Notes and the PIK Notes (the "Indentures") contain a number of covenants with
specified financial ratios and tests including, with respect to the Senior
Credit Facilities, maximum leverage ratios, rent adjusted maximum leverage
ratios and interest coverage ratios. Compliance with financial ratios is
measured at the end of each quarter. The Indentures also contain certain cross
default provisions. ACL's ability to meet the financial ratios is affected by
adverse weather conditions, seasonality and other risk factors inherent in its
business. The Senior Credit Facilities also contain mandatory prepayments of the
Term Loans with net proceeds from certain asset sales, equity issuances,
incurrence of indebtedness and sale and leaseback transactions, as well as
excess cash flow, as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities.

In late 2002, ACL obtained an amendment (the "Amendment") of certain
covenants under the Senior Credit Facilities, relating to third quarter and
fourth quarter 2002 covenants and a waiver of any past violations thereof.
Absent the Amendment, ACL would not have been in compliance with the leverage or
interest coverage ratios contained in its Senior Credit Facilities as of
December 27, 2002. At the end of the first quarter of 2003, the covenant ratios
revert to levels in effect before the Amendment. Although management had been
working on operating and financial plans to comply with its debt covenants in
2003 and thereafter, ACL was unable to complete an out-of-court restructuring
and management believed it was probable that ACL would not be in compliance with
the Senior Credit Facilities covenants at the end of the first quarter 2003,
absent another amendment to the Senior Credit Facilities. Accordingly, all of
ACL's long-term debt was classified as current debt as of December 27, 2002.

As of December 27, 2002, there were $37,740 outstanding in bonds (the
"MARAD Bonds") issued by Vessel Leasing, which bear interest at fixed rates of
5.65% and 6.14% (Tranche 1 and 2) and LIBOR plus .4% (Tranche 3). All three
tranches mature in 2016. The MARAD Bonds are guaranteed by the U.S. Maritime
Administration. Neither DHC nor ACL guarantees payment of the MARAD Bonds.

As of December 27, 2002, GMS had bank term loans outstanding of $33,652.
These loans bear interest at a rate equal to LIBOR plus a margin of 4.0% and
mature on May 1, 2005. GMS also had Illinois Development Finance Authority Bonds
outstanding in the amount of $5,325. These bonds bear interest at a variable
rate based on a municipal swap plus a margin of 4.5% index and mature January 1,
2010. GMS was in violation of certain bank loan covenants as of December 27,
2002. Accordingly, GMS' long-term bank debt has been reclassified as current
debt as of December 27, 2002.

As of December 27, 2002, GMSV had $2,850 in loans outstanding from the
International Finance Corporation which bear interest at LIBOR plus a margin of
4.75% and mature May 2007. ACL currently guarantees the outstanding loan
amounts. (GMSV is a group of companies in which DHC has a 57% ownership through
its ownership of ACL and GMS.)

DHC does not guarantee the debt of ACL, Vessel Leasing, GMS or GMSV.

NOTE 6. REINSURANCE

Reinsurance is the transfer of risk, by contract, from one insurance
company to another for consideration (premium). Reinsurance contracts do not
relieve Insurance Services from its obligations to policyholders. Failure of
reinsurers to honor their obligations could result in losses to Insurance
Services; consequently, allowances are established for amounts deemed
uncollectible. Insurance Services evaluates the financial condition of its
reinsurers and monitors concentrations of credit risk arising from similar
geographic regions, activities, or economic characteristics of the reinsurers to
minimize its exposure to significant losses from reinsurer insolvencies.
61

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

NAICC has reinsurance under both excess of loss and quota share treaties.
NAICC cedes reinsurance on an excess of loss basis for workers' compensation
risks in excess of $500 prior to April 2000 and $200 thereafter. Beginning in
May 2001, NAICC retained 50% of the loss between $200 and $500. For risks other
than workers' compensation, NAICC cedes reinsurance on an excess of loss basis
risks in excess of $250. Since January 1, 1999 the private passenger automobile
quota share ceded percentage was 10% and effective January 1, 2002 the quota
share treaty was terminated. The effect of reinsurance on written premiums and
earned premiums reflected in DHC's consolidated financial statements is as
follows:

The effect of ceded reinsurance on loss and LAE incurred was a decrease of
$2,982, $10,401 and $1,801 for the years ended December 2003, 2002 and 2001,
respectively.

As of the year ended December 2003, General Reinsurance Corporation
("GenRe") was the only reinsurer that comprised more than 10 percent of NAICC's
reinsurance recoverable on paid and unpaid claims. NAICC monitors all
reinsurers, by reviewing A.M. Best reports and ratings, information obtained
from reinsurance intermediaries and analyzing financial statements. As of
December 31, 2003, NAICC had reinsurance recoverable on paid and unpaid balances
of $13,100 from GenRe. As of the year ended December 2002, GenRe and Mitsui
Sumitomo Insurance Company Ltd. (Mitsui") were the only reinsurers that
comprised more than 10 percent of NAICC's reinsurance recoverable on paid and
unpaid claims of $13,000 and $2,700, respectively. Both GenRe and Mitsui have an
A.M. Best rating of A+ or better.

NOTE 7. UNPAID LOSSES AND LOSS ADJUSTMENT EXPENSES

The following table summarizes the activity in Insurance Services'
liability for unpaid losses and LAE during the three most recent years:

62

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

The net losses and LAE incurred during 2003 related to prior years is
attributable to recognition of unfavorable development in: commercial auto of
$5,500 for accident years 2000 through 2002, workers' compensation of $5,500 of
which $3,900 was attributable to Valor, and property and casualty of $1,500,
most of which stems from unallocated LAE reserves. The net losses and LAE
incurred during 2002 related to prior years is attributable to adverse
development on both the California workers' compensation line totaling $3,500,
certain private passenger automobile programs totaling $4,700 and commercial
automobile totaling $2,000. The losses and LAE incurred during 2001 related to
prior years is attributable to adverse development on both the California
workers' compensation line totaling $4,400 and certain private passenger
automobile programs, primarily outside of California, totaling $1,700. All of
the workers' compensation lines and the private passenger automobile programs
that caused higher than expected losses were placed in run-off during 2001.

Insurance Services has claims for environmental cleanup against policies
issued prior to 1985 and which are currently in run-off. The principal exposure
from these claims arises from direct excess and primary policies of businesses
in run-off, the obligations of which were assumed by Insurance Services. These
direct excess and primary claims are relatively few in number and have policy
limits of between $50 and $1,000, with reinsurance generally above $50.
Insurance Services also has environmental claims primarily associated with
participations in excess of loss reinsurance contracts assumed by Insurance
Services. These reinsurance contracts have relatively low limits, generally less
than $25, and estimates of unpaid losses are based on information provided by
the primary insurance company.

The unpaid losses and LAE related to environmental cleanup is established
considering facts currently known and the current state of the law and coverage
litigation. Liabilities are estimated for known claims (including the cost of
related litigation) when sufficient information has been developed to indicate
the involvement of a specific contract of insurance or reinsurance and
management can reasonably estimate its liability. Estimates for unknown claims
and development of reported claims are included in Insurance Services' unpaid
losses and LAE. The liability for the development of reported claims is based on
estimates of the range of potential losses for reported claims in the aggregate.
Estimates of liabilities are reviewed and updated continually and there is the
potential that Insurance Services' exposure could be materially in excess of
amounts which are currently recorded. Management does not expect that
liabilities associated with these types of claims will result in a material
adverse effect on the future liquidity or financial position of Insurance
Services. However, claims such as these are based upon estimates and there can
be no assurance that the ultimate liability will not exceed or even materially
exceed such estimates. As of the years ended December 2003 and 2002, Insurance
Services' net unpaid losses and LAE relating to environmental claims were
approximately $8,319 and $7,344, respectively.

NOTE 8. REGULATION, DIVIDEND RESTRICTIONS AND STATUTORY SURPLUS

DHC's insurance subsidiaries are regulated by various states. For
regulatory purposes, separate financial statements which are prepared in
accordance with statutory accounting principles are filed with these states.
Insurance Services prepares it's statutory-basis financial statements in
accordance with accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the California
Department of Insurance (the "CDI"). Prescribed statutory accounting practices
include a variety of publications of the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners, as well as state laws, regulations and general administrative
rules. Permitted statutory accounting practices encompass all accounting
practices not so prescribed (see below for discussion of Insurance Services'
permitted practice). The Association has adopted a comprehensive set of
accounting principles for qualification as an Other Comprehensive Basis of
Accounting which was effective in 2001. Insurance Services has determined that
application of these comprehensive accounting principles did not have a material
impact on its financial condition upon adoption. As of the years ended December
2003 and 2002, DHC's operating insurance subsidiaries had statutory capital and
surplus of $16,011 and $19,473, respectively. The combined statutory net loss
for DHC's operating insurance subsidiaries, as reported to the regulatory
authorities for the years ended December 2003, 2002 and 2001, was $10,135,
$22,500 and $8,800, respectively.

63

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

The CDI completed its examination of the statutory-basis financial
statements of NAICC, excluding Valor, for the four years ended December 2002.
The report was filed January 9, 2004. No restatement of NAICC's December 31,
2002 statutory financial statements was proposed by CDI as a result of the
examination. The CDI did, however, note an increase in statutory unpaid loss and
LAE by $4.1 million and a corresponding adjustment to surplus. The adjustment
issued by the Department was in response to NAICC's recognition of prior years
development in its June 30, 2003 quarterly filing.

A model for determining the risk-based capital ("RBC") requirements for
property and casualty insurance companies was adopted in December 1993 and
companies are required to report their RBC ratios based on their statutory
annual statements. As discussed in Note 4, ACL filed for protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. As a result, for statutory accounting
purposes, it was determined that NAICC's investment in ACL was fully impaired.
At December 31, 2002, NAICC recognized a statutory charge to its surplus of
$7,400. This charge, when combined with NAICC's underwriting results, reduced
its statutory surplus level below the Company action level per NAICC's RBC
calculation.

In response to the above statutory condition, in 2003, DHC repaid a $4,000
note due May 2004 to NAICC, and further contributed $4,000 to NAICC to increase
its statutory capital. With permission from the CDI, these transactions were
recorded at December 31, 2002 in NAICC's statutory-basis annual statement. After
consideration for the $8,000 noted above, NAICC's reported statutory-basis
capital and surplus as of December 31, 2002 was above the Company action level
of the RBC calculation. On December 30, 2003, DHC contributed $2,000 to NAICC to
increase its statutory capital.

Insurance companies are subject to insurance laws and regulations
established by the states in which they transact business. The governmental
agencies established pursuant to these state laws have broad administrative and
supervisory powers over insurance company operations. These powers include
granting and revoking of licenses to transact business, regulating trade
practices, establishing guaranty associations, licensing agents, approving
policy forms, filing premium rates on certain business, setting reserve
requirements, determining the form and content of required regulatory financial
statements, conducting periodic examination of insurers' records, determining
the reasonableness and adequacy of capital and surplus, and prescribing the
maximum concentrations of certain classes of investments. Most states have also
enacted legislation regulating insurance holding company systems, including
acquisitions, extraordinary dividends, the terms of affiliate transactions and
other related matters. DHC and its insurance subsidiaries have registered as
holding company systems pursuant to such legislation in California and routinely
report to other jurisdictions.

Under the California Insurance Code, NAICC is prohibited from paying
shareholder dividends, other than from accumulated earned surplus, exceeding the
greater of net income or ten percent of the preceding year's statutory surplus,
without prior approval of the CDI. No dividends were paid in 2003, 2002 or 2001.
The overall limit of dividends that can be paid during 2004 is approximately
$1,600 as long as there is sufficient accumulated earned surplus to pay such. As
of the year ended December 2003, NAICC did not have sufficient accumulated
earned surplus, as defined by the CDI, to pay further ordinary dividends.

NOTE 9. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE SECURITIZATION

At December 27, 2002 ACL had $39,300 outstanding under its pre-petition
accounts receivable securitization facility agreement and had $27,590 of net
residual interest in the securitized receivables which is included in Accounts
Receivable on the consolidated statement of financial position. The fair value
of the net residual interest is measured at the time of the sale and is based on
the sale of similar assets. In 2002, ACL received gross proceeds of $20,300 from
the sale of receivables and made gross payments of $23,600 under this agreement.
As described in Note 4, ACL's Pre-Petition Receivables Facility was retired with
proceeds from ACL's DIP Credit Facility.

64

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

NOTE 10. INVESTMENTS

The cost or amortized cost, unrealized gains, unrealized losses and fair
value of DHC's investments as of the year ended December 2003 and 2002,
categorized by type of security, were as follows:

The following table sets forth a summary of NAICC's temporarily impaired
investments at December 31, 2003:

All of the fixed maturity investments noted above were acquired in 2003 and
are investment grade securities rated A or better. The number of U.S. Treasury
obligations, Federal agency mortgage backed securities, and corporate bonds
temporarily impaired are 3, 10, and 4, respectively. No security has a fair
value less than 3% below its amortized cost.

Fixed maturities of DHC include mortgage-backed securities ("MBS")
representing 21.9% and 31.7% of the total fixed maturities at years ended
December 2003 and 2002, respectively. All MBS held by DHC are issued by the
Federal National Mortgage Association ("Fannie Mae") or the Federal Home Loan
Mortgage Corporation ("Freddie Mac"), both of which are rated "AAA" by Moody's
Investors Services. MBS and callable bonds, in contrast to other bonds, are more
sensitive to market value declines in a rising interest rate

65

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

environment than to market value increases in a declining interest rate
environment. This is primarily because of payors' increased incentive and
ability to prepay principal and issuers' increased incentive to call bonds in a
declining interest rate environment. Management does not believe that the
inherent prepayment risk in its portfolio is significant. However, management
believes that the potential impact of the interest rate risk on DHC's
consolidated financial statements could be significant because of the greater
sensitivity of the MBS portfolio to market value declines and the classification
of the entire portfolio as available-for-sale. DHC has no MBS concentrations in
any geographic region.

The expected maturities of fixed maturity securities, by amortized cost and
fair value, as of the year ended December 2003, are shown below. Expected
maturities may differ from contractual maturities due to borrowers having the
right to call or prepay their obligations with or without call or prepayment
penalties. Expected maturities of MBS are estimated based upon the remaining
principal balance, the projected cash flows and the anticipated prepayment rates
of each security:

DHC's fixed maturity and equity securities portfolio is classified as
"available for sale" and is carried at fair value. Changes in fair value are
credited or charged directly to stockholders' equity as unrealized gains or
losses, respectively. "Other than temporary" declines in fair value are recorded
as realized losses in the statement of operations and the cost basis of the
security is reduced.

The following reflects the change in net unrealized (loss) gain on
available-for-sale securities included as a separate component of accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders' equity:

The components of net unrealized (loss) gain on available-for-sale
securities for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001 consist of the
following:

66

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

DHC considers the following factors in determining whether declines in the
fair value of securities are "other than temporary":

a. the significance of the decline in fair value compared to the cost
basis,

b. the time period during which there has been a significant decline
in fair value,

c. whether the unrealized loss is credit-driven or a result of
changes in market interest rates,

d. a fundamental analysis of the business prospects and financial
condition of the issuer, and

e. DHC's ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of
time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.

Based upon these factors, securities that have indications of potential
impairment are subject to further review. In the third quarter of 2002, DHC
determined that two equity securities had declines in fair value that were
"other than temporary" and DHC, accordingly, recorded a realized loss of $2,655.
These securities were subsequently sold in the fourth quarter of 2002. At year
end 2002, DHC determined that one equity security had a decline in fair value
that was "other than temporary" and, accordingly, recorded a realized loss of
$967. The net unrealized loss of DHC's equity securities was $1,373 at the end
of December 2002.

During 2003, three equity securities had declines in fair value that were
"other than temporary" and, accordingly, DHC recorded a realized loss of $1,890.
All of these securities were sold by December 31, 2003.

Net realized investment gains (losses) for the years ended December were as
follows:

Gross realized gains relating to fixed maturities were $968, $14,848 and
$370 for the years ended December 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Gross
realized losses relating to fixed maturities were $16, $21 and $24 for the years
ended December 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Gross realized gains relating
to equity securities were $2,043, $100 and $2,427 for the years ended December
2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Gross realized losses relating to equity
securities were $2,005, $5,080 and $1,215 for the years

67

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

ended December 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Net investment income for the
years ended December 2003, 2002 and 2001 was:

At December 31, 2001, DHC held $58,493 face amount of ACL Senior Notes
10.25%, due June 30, 2008, at a cost of $30,026 and a fair value of $31,952,
representing 42.9% of stockholders' equity. These notes were contributed to ACL
Holdings in 2002 in connection with the acquisition discussed in Note 3. There
were no other investments with a carrying value greater than ten percent of
stockholders' equity as of years ended December 2003, 2002 or 2001.

In compliance with state insurance laws and regulations, securities with a
fair value of approximately $43,400, $45,000 and $45,000 as of the years ended
December 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively, were on deposit with various states
or governmental regulatory authorities. In addition, as of the years ended
December 2003, 2002 and 2001, investments with a fair value of $7,200, $6,400
and $6,600, respectively, were held in trust or as collateral under the terms of
certain reinsurance treaties and letters of credit. NAICC has letters of credit
outstanding of $2,800 as of December 31, 2003.

NOTE 11. REDUCTION OF INSURANCE OPERATIONS

Insurance Services' objective is to underwrite business that is expected to
yield an underwriting profit. Insurance Services has made a determination that
certain lines of insurance may not be sustainable in the current rate
environment. Competitive and regulatory pressures have resulted in a general
market for premium rates in these lines that is well below a level necessary in
order to achieve a profit, especially in light of increasingly unfavorable loss
history. Rather than continue to sustain losses, Insurance Services has exited
the workers' compensation line in all states, and the non-standard private
passenger automobile program written outside of California in 2001 and began
exiting the commercial automobile line in all states in 2003. The last new
commercial automobile policy was issued in July 2003 and the last commercial
auto policy renewed was September 2003. The last workers compensation policy
outside Montana was issued in July 2001 and the last Montana workers
compensation policy was issued in January 2002. Costs incurred in 2003 and 2001
associated with this process totaled approximately $224 and $1,250,
respectively, and are included in general and administrative expenses. The
remaining line of business written by Insurance Services is non-standard private
passenger automobile in the State of California.

68

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

NOTE 12. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

During the second quarter of 2002, DHC consummated a rights offering to
provide funds for the acquisition of ACL and related entities. 8,705,219 shares
of Common Stock were issued at $5 per share pursuant to the rights offering in
exchange for $42,228 in net proceeds, net of expenses. Expenses included a
$1,000 backstop fee paid to SZ Investments. In addition, 2,002,558 shares were
issued pursuant to warrants exercised that were previously held by SZ
Investments in connection with the rights offering for proceeds of $9,500 and
264,582 shares were issued pursuant to the exercise of options for proceeds of
$1,087.

In connection with the ACL acquisition, 339,040 shares of restricted Common
Stock were issued to ACL management. These restricted shares have been valued at
fair value at the date of issuance and vest one third annually over a three year
period. The full value of these shares is recorded as paid in capital with an
offset to unearned compensation in stockholders' equity. As employees render
service over the vesting period, compensation expense is recorded and unearned
compensation is reduced. During 2003, 155,506 unvested restricted shares were
cancelled due to employee terminations. The remaining unearned compensation
related to these cancelled shares was reduced with the offset recorded as a
reduction to additional paid-in capital.

On December 2, 2003, DHC issued 5,120,853 shares of Common Stock to three
existing shareholders in exchange for providing the bridge financing necessary
for the acquisition of Covanta. See Note 2 for additional information on the
acquisition and bridge financing agreements.

As of December 31, 2003, there were 35,793,440 shares of Common Stock
issued of which 35,782,644 were outstanding; the remaining 10,796 shares of
Common Stock issued but not outstanding are held as treasury stock. In
connection with efforts to preserve DHC's NOLs, DHC has imposed restrictions on
the ability of holders of five percent or more of Common Stock to transfer the
Common Stock owned by them and to acquire additional Common Stock, as well as
the ability of others to become five percent stockholders as a result of
transfers of Common Stock.

The following represents shares of Common Stock reserved for future
issuance as of December 31, 2003:

2004 rights offering (Note 2)............................... 26,836,983(A)
Required conversion of Laminar debt (Note 2)................ 8,750,000(A)
Stock purchase rights of certain creditors of Covanta (Note
2)........................................................ 3,000,000(A)
Stock options exercisable in 2004 (Note 15)................. 1,993,291
----------
40,580,274
==========

Also, as of December 31, 2003, there were 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock
authorized, with none issued or outstanding. The preferred stock may be divided
into a number of series as defined by the Board of Directors. The Board of
Directors is authorized to fix the rights, powers, preferences, privileges and
restrictions granted to and imposed upon the preferred stock upon issuance, with
prior approval of the stockholders required for any series of preferred stock
issued to any holder of 1% or more of the outstanding Common Stock.

A substantial portion of DHC's net assets are restricted. Various state
insurance requirements restrict the amounts that may be transferred to DHC in
the form of dividends or loans from its Insurance Services

- ---------------

(A) The number of shares is based on the maximum number of shares which could be
issued assuming 100% shareholder participation in the rights offering. The
number of shares for the required conversion of Laminar debt and the stock
purchase rights of certain creditors of Covanta are subject to the level of
public participation in the rights offering (as defined in the agreements),
as well as other limitations regarding the Covanta creditors' stock purchase
rights.
69

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

subsidiaries without prior regulatory approval. Various debt covenants and
regulatory requirements also restrict the amounts that may be transferred to DHC
in the form of cash dividends or loans from its Marine Services subsidiaries.
DHC's investment in the net assets of its Insurance Services subsidiaries and
its Marine Services subsidiaries, GMS and Vessel Leasing, amount to
approximately $17,300 and $4,400 at December 31, 2003, respectively.

NOTE 13. INCOME TAXES

DHC files a Federal consolidated income tax return with its subsidiaries.
DHC's Federal consolidated income tax return includes the taxable results of
certain grantor trusts. These trusts were established by certain state insurance
regulators and the courts as part of the 1990 reorganization from which the
Mission Insurance Group, Inc. ("Mission") emerged from Federal bankruptcy and
various state insolvency court proceedings as DHC. These trusts were created for
the purpose of assuming various liabilities of their grantors, certain present
and former subsidiaries of DHC (the "Mission Insurance Subsidiaries"). This
allowed the state regulators to administer the continuing run-off of Mission's
insurance business, while DHC and the Mission Insurance Subsidiaries were
released, discharged and dismissed from the proceedings free of any claims and
liabilities of any kind, including any obligation to provide further funding to
the trusts. The agreements establishing the trusts provide the grantor of each
trust with a certain "administrative power" which, as specified in Section
675(4)(c) of the Internal Revenue Code, requires that DHC include the income and
deductions of each trust on its consolidated Federal income tax returns.

This was to ensure that DHC's NOLs would remain available to offset any
post-restructuring taxable income of the trusts, thereby maximizing the amounts
available for distribution to trust claimants. The Insurance Commissioner of the
State of California and the Director of the Division of Insurance of the State
of Missouri, as the trustees, have sole management authority over the trusts.
Neither DHC nor any of its subsidiaries has any power to control or otherwise
influence the management of the trusts nor do they have any rights with respect
to the selection or replacement of the trustees. At the present time, it is not
anticipated that any of the Mission Insurance Subsidiaries will receive any
distribution with regard to their residual interests in the existing trusts.
Since DHC does not have a controlling financial interest in these trusts, they
are not consolidated with DHC for financial statement purposes.

As of the close of 2003, DHC had consolidated NOLs of $651,872 for Federal
income tax purposes. The NOLs will expire in various amounts, if not used,
between 2004 and 2023. The Internal Revenue Service has not audited any of DHC's
tax returns for any of the years during the carryforward period including those
returns for the years in which the losses giving rise to the NOLs were reported.

SFAS No. 109 "Accounting for Income Taxes" ("SFAS 109") requires the
establishment of a valuation allowance to reflect the likelihood of realization
of deferred tax assets. Pursuant to SFAS 109, DHC makes periodic determinations
of whether it is "more likely than not" that all or a portion of the DHC's
deferred tax assets will be realized. In making these determinations, DHC
considers all of the relevant factors, both positive and negative, which may
impact upon its future taxable income including the size and operating results
of its subsidiaries, the competitive environment in which these subsidiaries
operate and the impact of the grantor trusts. Exclusive of the trusts'
activities, DHC has generated cumulative taxable losses on a historical basis.
Over the past several years, DHC's subsidiaries and holding company operations
have been generating combined losses exclusive of net investment income, net
realized gains and the trusts' activities.

Therefore, due to the absence of a reliable taxable income stream, DHC has
recorded a valuation allowance for the amount by which its deferred tax assets
exceed its deferred tax liabilities and, as a result, DHC has not recorded any
liability or asset for deferred taxes.

70

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

DHC's NOLs will expire, if not used, in the following amounts in the
following years:

71

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to the deferred tax
assets and liabilities as of the years ended December 2003 and 2002,
respectively, are presented as follows:

NOTE 14. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

INSURANCE SERVICES

On January 1, 1988, NAICC established a 401(k) Plan in which all employees
of NAICC, and effective April 1, 1993, the Danielson Trust are eligible to
participate. Under the 401(k) Plan, employees may elect to contribute up to 20
percent of the eligible compensation to a maximum dollar amount allowed by the
IRS. In 2003, NAICC matched 50% of the first 4% of compensation contributed by
employees to the 401(k) Plan. In 2002, NAICC suspended its matching contribution
to the 401(k) Plan. Prior to January 1, 2002, the Company matched 50 percent of
the first six percent of compensation contributed by employees to the 401(k)
Plan. In the years ended December 2003 and 2001, NAICC's matching contribution
to the 401(k) Plan was satisfied through cash payments totaling $46 and $139,
respectively.

On January 1, 1988, Insurance Services adopted a non-contributory defined
benefit pension plan (the "Plan") covering substantially all of its employees.
Pension benefits are based on an employee's years of service and average final
compensation. The funding policy of the Plan is for the employers to contribute
the minimum pension costs equivalent to the amount required under the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and the Internal Revenue Code. Effective
December 31, 2001, Insurance Services amended the Plan to cease future service
credit for active employees.

72

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

The following table sets forth the Plan's funded status as of the years
ended December 2003 and 2002, valued at January 1, 2004 and 2003, respectively:

Net pension cost for the years ended December 2003, 2002 and 2001 include
the following components:

The following tables provide a reconciliation of the changes in the Plan's
benefit obligation and the fair value of plan assets as of the years ended
December 2003 and 2002:

The discount rate assumption used to determine benefit obligations at
December 31, 2003 and 2002 was 6.25% and 6.75%, respectively.

73

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

The assumptions used to determine net periodic pension cost for the years
ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 are as follows:

The overall expected long-term rate of return on plan assets was based on
the performance of the Plan during the past five years and on the expected
performance of the plan assets over the next five years pursuant to the
investment policies and strategies as described below.

The Plan's fair value percentage of plan assets at December 31, 2003 and
2002 by asset category are as follows:

The primary emphasis of the management of the Plan's portfolio of assets is
to establish sufficient funding for projected retirement benefits. To this end,
the primary investment management objective is long-term capital appreciation. A
secondary objective is to prevent erosion by inflation.

It is NAICC's intent that the portfolio be fully invested at all times. The
allocation between equity securities, debt securities and cash, including any
allocation between registered investment funds is left to the discretion of the
plan trustee except as required by the plan administrator for pending plan
disbursements.

To ensure adequate diversification, no more than 25% of the total market
value of Plan assets shall be invested in a single asset other than pooled funds
and mutual funds where underlying diversification shall be considered. The
portfolio shall satisfy the diversification requirements of ERISA at all times
as well as the liquidity requirements of the Plan. NAICC expects to contribute
$370 to the Plan in 2004.

MARINE SERVICES

ACL sponsors or participates in defined benefit plans covering both
salaried and hourly employees. The plans provide for eligible employees to
receive benefits based on years of service and either compensation rates near
retirement or at a predetermined multiplier factor. Contributions to the plans
are sufficient to meet the minimum funding standards set forth in the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), as amended. Plan assets
consist primarily of common stocks, corporate bonds and cash and cash
equivalents.

In addition to the defined benefit pension and related plans, ACL has a
defined benefit post-retirement health care plan covering most full-time
employees. The plan provides medical benefits and is contributory, with retiree
contributions adjusted annually, and contains other cost-sharing features such
as deductibles and coinsurance. The accounting for the healthcare plan
anticipates future cost-sharing changes to the written plan that are consistent
with ACL's expressed intent to increase the retiree contribution rate annually.

ACL also sponsors an employee contribution plan ("401(k) plan") covering
eligible employee groups. ACL's non-qualified savings plan, for certain members
of management, was suspended in 2003 as a result of the Chapter 11 filing.
Contributions to such plans are based upon a percentage of employee
contributions and were $1,274 in 2002. In 2003, ACL suspended the employer
matching of employee contributions in the 401(k) plan.

74

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

A summary of ACL's pension and post-retirement plan components follows:

Components of ACL's net periodic benefit cost for 2002 follows:

75

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

The assumptions used to determine ACL's net periodic benefit cost for 2002
are as follows:

ACL's post-retirement benefit obligation was determined using the
assumption that the health care cost trend rate for retirees was 10.0% for 2002,
decreasing gradually to a 5.0% trend rate by 2009 and remaining at that level
thereafter.

The following table presents the fair value percentage of ACL's plan assets
in each asset category as of December 27, 2002:

NOTE 15. STOCK OPTION PLAN

1990 STOCK OPTION PLAN

Options under the 1990 Stock Option Plan (the "1990 Plan") of DHC were
granted to officers or employees of DHC. On September 16, 1991, the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors of DHC resolved that it intended to refrain
from granting any additional options under the 1990 Plan. The 1990 Plan
terminated in 2001. The following table summarizes the options under the 1990
Plan:

1995 STOCK OPTION PLAN

The 1995 Stock and Incentive Plan (the "1995 Plan") is a qualified plan
which provides for the grant of any or all of the following types of awards:
stock options, including incentive stock options and non-qualified stock
options; stock appreciation rights, whether in tandem with stock options or
freestanding; restricted stock; incentive awards; and performance awards. The
purpose of the 1995 Plan is to enable DHC to provide incentives to increase the
personal financial identification of key personnel with the long-term growth of
DHC and the interests of DHC's stockholders through the ownership and
performance of Common Stock, to enhance DHC's ability to retain key personnel,
and to attract outstanding prospective employees and Directors. The 1995 Plan
became effective as of March 21, 1995.

76

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

In September 2001, DHC's stockholders approved amendments to the 1995 Plan
which increased the aggregate number of shares available for option grants from
1,700,000 to 2,540,000 and provides for options to be awarded to independent
contractors to enable DHC to attract, retain and give incentives to highly
qualified persons who provide valuable services to DHC. No awards may be granted
under the 1995 Plan after March 21, 2005. The 1995 Plan will remain in effect
until all awards have been satisfied or expired.

With regard to the general terms of stock option awards, under the 1995
Plan, the exercise price for options is determined at the grant date, but cannot
be less than the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on such grant
date. The contractual life of the options is specified at the grant date.
Options granted can vest no earlier than six months from the grant date.

In September, 2001, 140,000 options owned by certain directors of DHC
lapsed and were reissued under the 1995 Stock and Incentive Plan, as amended and
approved by DHC's Board.

On July 24, 2002, DHC's Board amended the 1995 Stock and Incentive Plan to
increase the aggregate number of shares available for grant from 2,540,000 to
4,976,273. The Board reserved 1,936,273 shares for the grant of stock options to
management of ACL, of which options for 1,560,000 shares of DHC common stock
were granted. The options have an exercise price of $5.00 per share and expire
10 years from the date of grant. One-half of the options time vest over a 4-year
period in equal annual installments and one-half of the options vest over a
4-year period in equal annual installments contingent upon the financial
performance of ACL and compliance with the terms of its senior bank facility. As
the market price of DHC's Common Stock was lower than the exercise price of the
options on the date of grant, and the performance targets have not been met, no
expense has been recognized in the accompanying financial statements for the
options granted to ACL management.

During 2003, options for 829,375 shares of Common Stock were forfeited due
to terminations and ACL not achieving the performance targets.

In July 2002, options for 918,084 shares previously granted to employees,
directors and contractors of DHC, which would have expired upon the termination
of the service of these individuals to DHC on July 24, 2002, were extended 2
years or 2 years beyond the termination of their service in a new capacity, but
in no event longer than the original term with vesting accelerated
simultaneously with the extension.

On August 7, 2003, DHC granted options for 50,000 shares of Common Stock to
an employee of NAICC. The options have an exercise price of $1.45 per share and
expire 10 years from the grant date. 20,000 of the options vest on the first and
second anniversary of the grant date and the remaining 10,000 options vest on
the third anniversary of the grant date. As the market price of the Common Stock
was equal to the exercise price of the options on the date of grant, no expense
has been recognized in the accompanying financial statements for the options
granted in 2003.

77

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

The following table summarizes the options under the 1995 Plan:

As of December 31, 2003, options for shares were outstanding in the
following price ranges:

DHC applies APB 25, and related interpretations in accounting for the stock
options granted to directors and employees. Accordingly, compensation costs of
$87 and $57 were recognized in 2002 and 2001, respectively, relating to the
modification of stock options granted to directors and employees. The fair value
based method of accounting prescribed by SFAS No. 123 "Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation" ("SFAS 123"), is used to measure stock-based
compensation for contractors. Accordingly, compensation costs of $137 and $833
were recognized in 2003 and 2002, respectively, relating to stock options
granted to contractors. Pro forma net income and earnings per share are
disclosed in Note 1 as if the fair value based method of accounting for
stock-based compensation under SFAS 123 had been applied to all stock options.
For pro forma calculation purposes, fair value of the option grants are
estimated as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model
with the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0% per annum; an expected life
of approximately 8 years; expected volatility of 50%-73%; and a risk free
interest rate of 4%-6%. The pro forma effect on net loss may not be
representative of the effects on income for future years.

78

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

NOTE 16. LEASES

Insurance Services has entered into various non-cancelable operating lease
arrangements for office space and data processing equipment and services. The
terms of the operating leases generally contain renewal options and escalation
clauses based on increases in operating expenses and other factors. Rent expense
under operating leases was $1,229, $1,387 and $1,446 for the years ended
December 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. At year end December 2003, future
net minimum operating lease rental payment commitments were as follows:

2004........................................................ $ 966
2005........................................................ 530
2006........................................................ 500
------
$1,996
======

Marine Services leases buildings, data processing hardware and operating
equipment under various operating leases and charter agreements, which expire
from 2003 to 2017 and which generally have renewal options at similar terms.
Certain vessel leases also contain purchase options at prices approximating the
fair value of the leased vessels. Rental expense under continuing obligations
was approximately $29,896 in 2002.

NOTE 17. RELATED PARTIES

Samuel Zell, the Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and
President of DHC, is the Chairman of Equity Group Investments, L.L.C. ("EGI").
Commencing April 16, 2003, EGI provides administrative services for DHC. These
services include financial, tax, accounting, SEC filings and related
administrative costs. DHC paid EGI $170 for these services in 2003. ACL was paid
a fee of $52 in 2003 for providing these services prior to April 16, 2003.

Prior to and shortly after the acquisition of ACL, DHC shared certain
personnel and facilities with several affiliated and unaffiliated companies who
have certain common directors and officers, and certain expenses were allocated
among the various entities. Personnel costs were allocated based upon actual
time spent on DHC business. Costs relating to office space and equipment were
allocated based upon actual usage. Management believes the methodology used for
allocation is appropriate. Total expenses allocated to DHC from affiliated
entities were $1,765 and $1,334 for the years ended December 2002 and 2001,
respectively.

As described in Note 2, SZ Investments, Third Avenue and Laminar provided
the bridge financing required for the Covanta acquisition. See Note 2 for terms
and conditions relating to this debt. Interest expense on this financing
amounted to $400 in 2003.

In connection with the DHC Recapitalization of ACL described in Note 3, DHC
provided SZ Investments unlimited demand registration rights with respect to the
ACL Senior Notes and ACL PIK Notes held by HY I Investments, L.L.C. ('HYI'), an
affiliate of SZ Investments. Mr. Zell and Mr. Tinkler, DHC's Chief Financial
Officer, are affiliated with SZ Investments and HYI. HYI is a holder of
approximately 42% of ACL's Senior Notes and PIK Notes. Mr. Pate, a member of
DHC's Board of Directors, is affiliated with SZ Investments and HYI and is an
executive officer of EGI. A special committee of DHC's Board of Directors
composed solely of disinterested directors oversees DHC's investment in ACL and
related Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings.

On April 14, 1999, DHC entered into a non-exclusive investment advisory
agreement with EGI pursuant to which EGI agreed to provide, at the request of
DHC, certain investment banking services to DHC in connection with potential
transactions. For these services, in 2002, DHC paid a fee of $63 to EGI. The
agreement provided that, in the event that a transaction was consummated for
which the Acquisition Committee of DHC's Board of Directors determined that EGI
provided material services, DHC would pay to

79

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

EGI a fee in the amount of 1% of the aggregate consideration in connection with
such transaction (including indebtedness assumed or outstanding). As a result of
services provided to DHC during the DHC Recapitalization of ACL, DHC and EGI
agreed that the fee for EGI's services was $3,000. DHC also agreed to reimburse,
upon request, EGI's out-of-pocket expenses related to services provided under
the investment advisory agreement. For providing a standby commitment to
purchase any DHC shares that were unsubscribed in the rights offering conducted
by DHC as part of its acquisition of ACL, DHC paid SZ Investments a fee of
$1,000. Messrs. Zell and Pate were members of the Acquisition Committee at the
time of the DHC Recapitalization of ACL, along with Messrs. Whitman and Barse,
all of whom are Directors of DHC. On December 1, 2003, DHC and EGI terminated
this agreement.

NOTE 18. CONTINGENCIES

Insurance Services is involved in litigation relating to losses arising
from insurance contracts in the normal course of business which are provided for
under "unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses." While litigation is by
nature uncertain, management, based in part on advice from counsel, believes
that the ultimate outcome of these actions will not have a material adverse
effect on DHC's consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash
flow.

NOTE 19. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The carrying amounts and fair values of financial instruments are as
follows as of December 31, 2003:

The fair values of the Fixed Maturity Securities and Equity Securities are
based on quoted market values. The carrying values of the Bridge Financing Loans
approximate their fair values since these loans were recently obtained in
December 2003.

NOTE 20. EQUITY METHOD MARINE SERVICES INVESTEES

As discussed in Note 4, DHC wrote off its investment in ACL during the
quarter ended March 28, 2003. The GMS and Vessel Leasing investments are not
considered by DHC to be impaired. The reported net loss for the year ended
December 31, 2003 includes, under the caption "Equity in Net Loss of
Unconsolidated Marine Services Subsidiaries", the following components:

ACL's Reported Loss for the Three Months Ended March 28,
2003...................................................... $(46,998)
Other Than Temporary Impairment of Remaining Investment in
ACL as of March 28, 2003.................................. (8,205)
--------
Total ACL Loss.............................................. (55,203)
GMS Income.................................................. 55
Vessel Leasing Income....................................... 271
--------
Equity in Net Loss of Unconsolidated Marine Services
Subsidiaries.............................................. $(54,877)
========

80

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

The following is a summary of financial information for ACL as of December
26, 2003 and for the year ended:

Current Assets.............................................. $172,218
Noncurrent Assets........................................... 639,978
--------
$812,196
========
Liabilities not Subject to Compromise:
Current Liabilities....................................... $164,672
Other Liabilities......................................... 39,678
--------
204,350
Liabilities Subject to Compromise........................... 627,520
Member's Deficit............................................ (19,674)
--------
$812,196
========
Operating Revenue........................................... $620,071
Operating Income............................................ 367
Net Loss.................................................... (61,576)

NOTE 21. BUSINESS SEGMENTS

DHC has three reportable business segments -- insurance, marine and
corporate. The Insurance Services segment writes property and casualty insurance
in the western United States, primarily in California. The Marine segment
includes the Barging, Construction and Terminals segments of the Marine Services
businesses which are accounted for using the equity method during 2003. The
corporate segment represents the operating expenses and miscellaneous income of
the holding company, DHC.

Management evaluates performance based on segment earnings, which is
defined as operating income before income taxes. The accounting policies of the
reportable segments are consistent with those described in the summary of
significant accounting policies.

Reportable segments are business units that offer different products or
services. The reportable segments are managed separately because they provide
distinct products and services to internal and external customers.

81

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

The following is a reconciliation of segment (loss) earnings to
consolidated totals:

NOTE 22. QUARTERLY DATA (UNAUDITED)

As discussed in Note 3, DHC acquired ACL on May 29, 2002 and, accordingly,
the operating results for 2002 include ACL beginning with the date of
acquisition. As discussed in Note 1, DHC began accounting for its investment in
ACL on the equity method in the first quarter of 2003 and, as discussed in Note
20, wrote off its investment in ACL in the same quarter.

82

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

NOTE 23. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) as of December 31, 2003 and December
27, 2002 consists of the following:

NOTE 24. PURCHASE OF COVANTA

On March 5, 2004, the Bankruptcy Court confirmed the proposed plans
discussed in Note 2 and, on March 10, 2004, DHC purchased 100% of the equity of
the energy and water businesses of Covanta in connection with its emergence from
Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings.

A preliminary estimate of the purchase price ranges from $46,000 to $51,000
which includes the cash purchase price of $30,000, an expense estimate of
approximately $6,000 for professional fees and other costs incurred in
connection with the acquisition, and an estimated fair value ranging from
$10,000 to $15,000 for DHC's commitment to sell up to 3 million shares of its
Common Stock at $1.53 per share to certain creditors of Covanta, subject to
certain limitations (see Note 2). The final purchase cost will be determined as
DHC obtains additional information. The results of operations of Covanta will be
consolidated with DHC commencing with the date of acquisition, March 10, 2004. A
preliminary allocation of the purchase price has not been determined by DHC.
Accordingly, it is not practicable at this time to disclose the amount to be
assigned to each major asset and liability caption of Covanta at the acquisition
date.

83

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Danielson Holding Corporation

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statement of financial position of
Danielson Holding Corporation ("DHC") as of December 31, 2003 and December 27,
2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. Our audits also included the
financial statement schedules listed in the index at Item 15(a) for the years
then ended. These financial statements and schedules are the responsibility of
DHC's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements and schedules based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the consolidated financial position of DHC at December
31, 2003 and December 27, 2002, and the consolidated results of its operations
and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. Also, in our opinion, the
related financial statement schedules for the years ended December 31, 2003 and
December 27, 2002, when considered in relation to the 2003 and 2002 basic
consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all
material respects the information set forth therein.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG, LLP
Louisville, Kentucky
February 20, 2004, except for
Note 24 as to which the date is
March 10, 2004

84

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Danielson Holding Corporation

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows of Danielson
Holding Corporation and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2001. Our
audit also included the financial statement schedules listed in the index at
Item 15(a) for the year ended December 31, 2001. These consolidated financial
statements and schedules are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial
statements and schedules based on our audits.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and cash
flows of Danielson Holding Corporation and subsidiaries for the year ended
December 31, 2001, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the related financial
statement schedules for the year ended December 31, 2001, when considered in
relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole,
present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

/S/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York
March 5, 2002

85

SCHEDULE I.

DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

PARENT COMPANY ONLY
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

86

SCHEDULE I. -- (CONTINUED)
DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

CONDENSED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION

PARENT COMPANY ONLY
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

87

SCHEDULE I. -- (CONTINUED)
DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

PARENT COMPANY ONLY
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

88

SCHEDULE II -- VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

- ---------------

(1) Acquired with purchase of ACL and GMS

89

SCHEDULE V -- SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
CONCERNING PROPERTY-CASUALTY INSURANCE OPERATIONS

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

There were no disagreements with accountants in 2001 or 2002. KPMG LLP
("KPMG") served as DHC's principal independent accounting firm until July 25,
2002. On July 25, 2002, KPMG's appointment as the principal independent
accounting firm for DHC was terminated and Ernst & Young LLP ("E&Y") was engaged
as DHC's principal independent accounting firm. The decision to change
accounting firms was made by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of
DHC. Prior to such change, DHC actively considered whether it was advisable to
change firms following DHC's acquisition of ACL, whose business is different
from DHC's traditional areas. DHC solicited bids from a group of accounting
firms, including KPMG, and on the basis of that information the Audit Committee
determined that DHC should change accounting firms.

In connection with the audit of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001,
and during the subsequent interim period through July 25, 2002, there were no
disagreements with KPMG on any matter of accounting principles or practices,
financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures, which
disagreements if not resolved to their satisfaction would have caused them to
make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with
their report.

The audit report of KPMG on the consolidated financial statements of DHC
and its subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2001 did not contain any
adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor were they qualified or modified as
to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles.

During DHC's fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 and the subsequent interim
period through July 25, 2002, DHC did not consult with E&Y regarding any of the
matters or events set forth in Items 304(a)(2)(i) and (ii) of Regulation S-K.

E&Y has reviewed the disclosures in this Item 9 and concurs with the
statements regarding E&Y set forth herein. DHC has also provided KPMG with a
copy of the disclosures contained herein. KPMG previously has furnished a letter
to the SEC attached as Exhibit 16.1 to DHC's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
August 1, 2002.

90

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

DHC's management, with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of DHC's disclosure
controls and procedures, as required by Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d- 15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"). Based upon the results of
that evaluation, DHC's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have
concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this annual report, DHC's
disclosure controls and procedures were effective in all material respects to
ensure that the information required to be disclosed by DHC in reports it files
or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms.

We also maintain a system of internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Rules 13A-15(f) and 15d-15(f) designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. During our most recent
fiscal quarter, there have been no changes in our internal control over
financial reporting that occurred that have materially affected or are
reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial
reporting.

DHC's management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, does not expect that its disclosure controls and procedures or internal
controls and procedures will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system,
no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not
absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further,
the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource
constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their
costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation
of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances
of fraud, if any, within DHC have been detected. These inherent limitations
include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that
breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls
can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two
or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any
system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the
likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will
succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions;
over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system,
misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

MANAGEMENT

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

91

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

BACKGROUND OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND MANAGEMENT

David M. Barse has served as a Director since 1996. Mr. Barse is a member
of the ACL Special Committee. Mr. Barse is also a member of the ACL Board of
Managers. Mr. Barse served as the President and Chief Operating Officer of DHC
from July 1996 until July 24, 2002. Since June 1995, Mr. Barse has been the
President (and, since July 1999, Chief Executive Officer) of M.J. Whitman, LLC
("MJW") and it's predecessor, a full service broker-dealer. From April 1995
until February 1998 he served as the Executive Vice President and Chief
Operating Officer of Third Avenue Trust and its predecessor, Third Avenue Value
Fund, Inc. (together with its predecessor, "Third Avenue Trust"), before
assuming the position of President in May 1998 and Chief Executive Officer in
September 2003. Since February 1998, Mr. Barse has served as President, and
since June 2003, Chief Executive Officer of Third Avenue Management LLC ("TAM")
and its predecessor, the investment adviser of Third Avenue Trust and Third
Avenue Variable Series Trust ("Variable Trust"). In 2001, Mr. Barse became
Trustee of both the Third Avenue Trust and Variable Trust. Mr. Barse joined the
predecessor of MJW and TAM in December 1991 as General Counsel. Mr. Barse also
presently serves as a director of American Capital Access Holdings, a financial
insurance company. Mr. Barse is 41 years old.

Richard L. Huber has been a Director since July 2002. Mr. Huber is the
Chairman of the Audit Committee. Mr. Huber has been Managing Director, Chief
Executive Officer and Principal of the Latin American direct investment group
Norte-Sur Partners, a direct private equity investment firm focused on Latin
America since January 2001. Mr. Huber held various positions with Aetna, Inc.
since 1995, most recently as the Chief Executive Officer until February 2000.
Mr. Huber has approximately forty years of prior investment and merchant
banking, international business, and management experience, including executive
positions with Chase Manhattan Bank, Citibank, Bank of Boston, and Continental
Bank. Mr. Huber is also Chairman of ACL and a member of its Board or Managers, a
DHC subsidiary, UABL Ltd., a 50% owned subsidiary of DHC, and a director of
Opticare Health Systems, Inc., an integrated eye care services company. Mr.
Huber is 67 years old.

Eugene M. Isenberg has been a Director since 1990. Mr. Isenberg is a member
of the Compensation and ACL Special Committees. Mr. Isenberg has been Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer of Nabors Industries, Inc., the worlds largest land
and offshore platform drilling company since 1987. Prior to 1987, Mr. Isenberg
was Chairman of the Board and principal stockholder of Genimar Inc., a steel
trading and building products company and served in various management
capacities with Exxon Corp. Mr. Isenberg presently serves as a director of the
American Stock Exchange, the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.,
and the National Petroleum Council. Mr. Isenberg founded and is the principal
sponsor of the Parkside School for children with learning disabilities in New
York City and The University of Massachusetts Eugene M. Isenberg School of
Management is named in recognition of his generous contributions. Mr. Isenberg
is 74 years old.

92

William C. Pate has been a Director since 1999. Mr. Pate is Managing
Director of Equity Group Investments, L.L.C., a privately-held investment firm
("EGI"). Mr. Pate has been employed by EGI or its predecessor in various
capacities since 1994. Mr. Pate is 40 years old.

Jean Smith has been a director since December 2003 and a member of the
audit committee since March 5, 2004. Ms. Smith has been a private investor and
consultant since 2001. From 1998 to 2001, Ms. Smith was Managing Director,
Corporate Finance, for U.S. Bancorp Libra, a unit of U.S. Bancorp Investments,
Inc., a subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp in New York. Ms. Smith has approximately 25
years of investment and international banking experience, including positions
with Banker Trust Company, Citicorp Investment Bank, Security Pacific Merchant
Bank and UBS Securities. Ms. Smith is 48 years old.

Joseph P. Sullivan has been a Director since July 2002. Mr. Sullivan is the
Chairman of the Compensation Committee and a member of the Audit Committee. Mr.
Sullivan is a private investor and is currently retired after serving as the
Chairman of the Board of IMC Global from July 1999 to November 2000, and as a
Member of its Board of Directors and Executive Committee from March 1996 through
December 2000. Mr. Sullivan served as Chairman of the Board of the Vigoro
Corporation from March 1991 through February 1996 and as its Chief Executive
Officer from March 1991 to September 1994. Mr. Sullivan is 70 years old.

Philip G. Tinkler has served as the Chief Financial Officer of DHC since
January 27, 2003. Mr. Tinkler is Chief Financial Officer of EGI and has served
in various other capacities for EGI or its predecessor since 1990. Mr. Tinkler
has been Vice President - Finance and Treasurer of First Capital Financial, LLC,
a sponsor of public limited real estate partnerships, since April 2001. Mr.
Tinkler is 39 years old.

Martin J. Whitman has been a Director since 1990. Mr. Whitman is a member
of the ACL Special Committee. Mr. Whitman served as the Chief Executive Officer
of DHC from July 1996 until July 24, 2002. Since 1974, Mr. Whitman has been the
President and controlling stockholder of MJW which, until August 1991, was a
registered broker-dealer. Since March 1990, Mr. Whitman has been the Chairman of
the Board, Chief Executive Officer (until September 2003) and a Trustee (and,
from January 1991 to May 1998, the President) of Third Avenue Trust. Since July
1999, Mr. Whitman has been the Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
(until September 2003) and a Trustee of Variable Trust. Since March 1990, Mr.
Whitman has been Chairman of the Board (and, until February 1998, the President
and until June 2003 Chief Executive Officer) of TAM and its predecessor. Since
March 1991, Mr. Whitman has served as a Director of Nabors Industries, Inc.
("Nabors"), a publicly-traded oil and gas drilling company. Mr. Whitman is 79
years old.

Clayton Yeutter has served as a Director since July 2002. Mr. Yeutter is a
member of the Audit Committee. Mr. Yeutter has been Of Counsel to Hogan &
Hartson LLP, a law firm in Washington, D.C., since 1993 where he has an
international trade and agricultural law practice. From 1985 through 1991 he
served in the Reagan Administration as the U.S. Trade Representative and in the
first Bush Administration as Secretary of Agriculture. During 1991-92, he was
Chairman of the Republican National Committee and then returned to the Bush
Administration as Counselor to the President for most of 1992. He was President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange from 1978-1985.
In the 1970s, Mr. Yeutter held several positions in the Nixon and Ford
Administrations as Assistant Secretary of Agriculture for Marketing and Consumer
Services, Assistant Secretary of Agriculture for International Affairs and
Commodity Programs, and Deputy Special Trade Representative. Mr. Yeutter is the
Chairman of the Board of Oppenheimer Funds, an institutional investment manager,
a director of Weyerhaeuser Company, a timber, forest products and real estate
company, Crop Solutions, Inc., a privately owned agricultural chemical company
and America First, a privately owned investment management company. Mr. Yeutter
is 73 years old.

Samuel Zell has served as a Director since 1999 and as the President, Chief
Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company since July 24, 2002.
Mr. Zell has served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of EGI, a
privately-held investment firm, since 1999, and had been Chairman of the Board
of its predecessor, Equity Group Investments, Inc., for more than five years.
Mr. Zell has been a trustee and Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Equity
Office Properties Trust, an equity real estate investment trust (a "REIT")
primarily focused on office buildings, since October 1996, and was President
from April 2002 to
93

November 2002 and Chief Executive Officer from April 2002 to April 2003. For
more than the past five years, Mr. Zell has served as Chairman of the Board of
Anixter International, Inc., a distributor of electrical and cable products; as
Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Manufactured Home Communities, an equity
REIT primarily focused on manufactured home communities; and as Chairman of the
Board of Trustees of Equity Residential Properties Trust, an equity REIT
primarily focused on multifamily residential properties. For more than the past
five years, Mr. Zell has been Chairman of the Board of Capital Trust, Inc., a
specialized finance company. Mr. Zell is 62 years old.

AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Board of Directors has a standing audit committee, which currently
consists of Messrs. Huber (Chairman), Sullivan, Yeutter and Ms. Smith. All of
the current members of the audit committee are Independent Directors, as defined
by Section 121(A) of the American Stock Exchange listing standards. The Board of
Directors has determined that Mr. Sullivan is an "audit committee financial
expert" under applicable SEC rules.

CODE OF ETHICS

DHC has a Code of Ethics which applies to DHC's senior financial officers,
including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. The Code of
Ethics is available on DHC's web site at www.danielsonholding.com and DHC will
provide a copy of the Code of Ethics without charge to any person who requests
it by writing to Philip G. Tinkler, Chief Financial Officer, at Two North
Riverside Plaza, Suite 600, Chicago, Illinois 60606. DHC will post on its
website amendments to or waivers from its Code of Ethics for executive officers,
the principal accounting officer or directors, in accordance with applicable
laws and regulations.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires DHC's Directors and executive
officers, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of
DHC's equity securities, to file with the SEC and the American Stock Exchange
initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of Common Stock
and other equity securities of DHC. Executive officers, Directors and greater
than ten-percent stockholders are required by Federal securities regulations to
furnish DHC with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

Based upon a review of filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission
and/or written representations from certain reporting persons, DHC believes that
all of its Directors, executive officers and other Section 16 reporting persons
complied during fiscal 2003 with the reporting requirements of Section 16(a),
except that Mr. Zell filed late one Form 4 with respect to shares held by his
spouse as trustee of a revocable trust.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth information concerning the annual and
long-term compensation for services in all capacities to DHC, or its subsidiary
companies or their predecessors for 2001 through 2003 of those persons who
served as (i) the Chief Executive Officer during 2003, (ii) the most highly
compensated executive officer employed by DHC as of December 31, 2003, and (iii)
the former Chief Executive Officer

94

and Director of a significant subsidiary of DHC but who was not serving as an
executive officer at year end (collectively, the "Named Executive Officers"):

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

- ---------------

(1) No bonuses were paid to Named Executive Officers in 2003.

(2) Consists of automobile allowance only.

(3) Consists of the dollar value of restricted stock awards (calculated by
multiplying the number of shares awarded by the closing market price of
DHC's Common Stock on the date of the grant - which was $6.16 as of the May
29, 2002 grant date) to certain members of ACL management made in restricted
DHC Common Stock as part of the DHC Recapitalization whereby Mr. Hagen, who
held preferred membership units in American Commercial Holdings LLC ("ACL
Holdings") at the time of the DHC Recapitalization abandoned those units to
ACL Holdings for no consideration and received 90,293 shares of restricted
DHC Common Stock for his continued employment with ACL, 60,195 of such
shares were forfeited upon Mr. Hagan's termination of employment.

(4) Amounts shown include the 2002 above-market portion of earnings on a CSX
Corporation deferred compensation program available to Mr. Hagan through his
employment at ACL in the amount of $29,621. Amounts shown also include life
insurance premium payments made on behalf of Mr. Hagan in the amount of
$5,433; matching contributions made by ACL in conjunction with deferral of
salary or bonus to a supplementary savings plan on behalf of Mr. Hagan in
the amount of $9,450; and payment for the provision of tax services for Mr.
Hagan in the amount of $1,991. Amounts for 2002 also include matching
contributions made by ACL to Mr. Hagan to the ACL 401(k) plan in the amount
of $5,512.

For 2003, includes severance pay of $275,000; life insurance premium payment
made on behalf of Mr. Hagan in the amount of $2,901; payment for the
provision of tax services for Mr. Hagan in the amount of $2,903; and accrued
vacation pay of $12,116.

(5) Amounts shown for Mr. Hagan were paid by ACL, a significant subsidiary of
DHC as of December 27, 2002 and until January 31, 2003.

95

OPTIONS/SAR GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR

There were no stock options or SARS granted to DHC's Named Executive
Officers in 2003.

The following table sets forth the number of securities underlying
unexercised options held by each of the Named Executive Officers and the value
of such options at the end of fiscal 2003:

AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND FISCAL YEAR END OPTION
VALUES

- ---------------

(1) Value of unexercised options at fiscal year-end represents the difference
between the exercise price of any outstanding in-the-money options and
$2.95, the mean value of DHC common stock on December 31, 2003. All
outstanding options have exercise prices in excess of $2.95 and, as a
result, none of the options have value as of December 31, 2003.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table sets forth information regarding the number of
securities which could be issued upon the exercise of outstanding options, the
weighted average exercise price of those options and the number of securities
remaining for future issuance under the 1995 Stock and Incentive Plan. DHC does
not have any equity compensation plans that have not been approved by its
security holders.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

The Compensation Committee is currently composed of Messrs. Sullivan
(Chairman), Barse and Isenberg. During 2003, none of the persons who served as
members of the Compensation Committee of DHC's Board also was, during that year
or previously, an officer or employee of DHC or any of its subsidiaries or had
any other relationship requiring disclosure herein, except as follows:

Mr. Barse is the Chief Executive Officer of Third Avenue Trust and Third
Avenue Management, LLC ("TAM"), the sole investment advisor to the Third Avenue
Value Fund Series ("TAVF") of Third Avenue Trust. TAM owns over 5% of DHC. Mr.
Barse served as the President and Chief Operating Officer of DHC from July 1996
until July 24, 2002.

As part of the investment and purchase agreement dated as of December 2,
2003 pursuant to which DHC agreed to acquire Covanta, DHC arranged for a new
$118 million replacement letter of credit facility for Covanta, secured by a
second lien on Covanta's domestic assets. This financing was provided by the
Bridge

96

Lenders: SZ Investments, L.L.C. ("SZ Investments"), Third Avenue Trust, on
behalf of Third Avenue Value Fund Series ("Third Avenue") and D. E. Shaw Laminar
Portfolios, L.L.C., a significant creditor of Covanta ("Laminar"). Each of SZ
Investments, Third Avenue and Laminar or an affiliate own over 5% of DHC's
Common Stock. Samuel Zell, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief
Executive Officer of DHC, Philip G. Tinkler, Chief Financial Officer of DHC and
William Pate, a director of DHC, are affiliated with SZ Investments. Martin
Whitman and David Barse, directors of DHC, are affiliated with Third Avenue.

DHC obtained the financing for its acquisition of Covanta pursuant to a
note purchase agreement dated December 2, 2003, from the Bridge Lenders.
Pursuant to the note purchase agreement, the Bridge Lenders provided DHC with
$40 million bridge financing in exchange for notes issued by DHC. In the event
that DHC is unable to repay all or a portion of the notes pursuant to a planned
rights offering of Common Stock, then the notes are convertible without action
by the Bridge Lenders into shares of Common Stock at a price of $1.53 per share
subject to certain agreed upon limitations necessitated by DHC's NOLs. These
notes have a scheduled maturity date of January 2, 2005 and an extended maturity
date of July 15, 2005, and bear interest at a rate of 12% through July 15, 2004
and 16% thereafter. In the event of a default or the failure to pay a
convertible note on its maturity, the interest rate under the convertible note
increases by 2%. In consideration for the $40 million of bridge financing and
the arrangement by the Bridge Lenders of the $118 million second lien credit
facility and the arrangement by Laminar of a $10 million international revolving
credit facility secured by Covanta's international assets, DHC issued to the
Bridge Lenders an aggregate of 5,120,853 shares of Common Stock.

At the time that DHC entered into the note purchase agreement, agreed to
issue the notes convertible into shares of Common Stock and issued the equity
compensation to the Bridge Lenders, the Common Stock was trading on the American
Stock Exchange at a price of $1.40 per share, which was below the $1.53 per
share conversion price of the notes. DHC has agreed with the Bridge Lenders to
file a registration statement with the SEC to register the shares of Common
Stock issued to them under the note purchase agreement not later than the
earlier of June 30, 2004 and ten days after closing of the rights offering.

PENSION PLANS

DHC does not offer a pension benefit. NAICC offers certain pension and
retirement benefits.

BENEFIT PLANS

DHC does not offer employee benefits. However, Mr. Hagan participated in
the ACL 401(k) Plan and received health benefits through ACL. NAICC offers
certain benefit plans.

COMPENSATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Each Director who was not an officer or employee of the DHC or its
subsidiaries received compensation of $7,500 per quarter for their services.
Each eligible Director was paid $30,000. Members of the Audit, Compensation,
Public Policy and Independent Committees were eligible to receive $1,500 per
meeting. Payments to Directors for these meetings were $27,000 in total for all
Directors. Directors who are officers or employees of DHC or its subsidiaries
receive no fees for service on the Board.

BY-LAW AMENDMENT

DHC's By-Laws were amended in 2003, to allow a holder of 20% of more of the
outstanding Common Stock to nominate a candidate for election by DHC's
shareholders as a member of the Board of Directors.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

SECURITY OWNERSHIP

The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of Common Stock as
of March 11, 2004 of (a) each Director, (b) each executive officer, and (c) each
person known by DHC to own beneficially more
97

than five percent of the outstanding shares of Common Stock. DHC believes that,
except as otherwise stated, the beneficial holders listed below have sole voting
and investment power regarding the shares reflected as being beneficially owned
by them.

- ---------------

* Percentage of shares beneficially owned does not exceed one percent of the
outstanding Common Stock.

(1) In accordance with provisions of DHC's certificate of incorporation, all
certificates representing shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by
holders of five percent or more of the Common Stock are owned of record by
DHC, as escrow agent, and are physically held by DHC in that capacity.

(2) Includes 2,600,372 shares beneficially owned by Third Avenue Management,
LLC ("TAM"), as the sole investment adviser to Third Avenue Value Fund
Series of the Third Avenue Trust ("TAVF"), an investment company registered
under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and by separate accounts managed
by TAM.

(3) Beneficially owned by the Commissioner of Insurance of the State of
California in his capacity as trustee for the benefit of holders of certain
deficiency claims against certain trusts which assumed liabilities of
certain present and former insurance subsidiaries of DHC.

98

(4) In addition, under a note purchase agreement, Laminar has agreed to acquire
up to 8.75 million shares of Common Stock, based upon levels of publication
participation in DHC's previously announced rights offering, pursuant to
the conversion of notes purchased by Laminar in connection with the
financing of the Covanta acquisition. The actual number of shares to be
acquired and the date on which such shares will be acquired cannot be
determined at this time.

(5) Includes 6,740,825 shares of Common Stock owned by SZ Investments, which is
affiliated with Mr. Zell. Includes 7,000 shares of Common Stock owned by
Helen Zell, his wife as trustee of a revocable trust. Also includes shares
underlying currently exercisable options to purchase 129,166 shares of
Common Stock at an exercise price of $3.37 per share owned by EGI, also an
affiliate of Mr. Zell.

(6) Includes 2,600,372 shares beneficially owned by TAM, as the sole advisor to
TAVF and in separate accounts managed by TAM, of which Mr. Barse is the
Chief Executive Officer. Includes shares underlying currently exercisable
options to purchase an aggregate of 50,000 shares of Common Stock at an
exercise price of $5.6875 per share, 50,000 shares of Common Stock at an
exercise price of $7.0625 per share, 25,000 shares of Common Stock at an
exercise price of $3.65625 per share, 50,000 shares of Common Stock at an
exercise price of $5.3125 per share, 50,000 shares of Common Stock at an
exercise price of $4.00 per share and 100,000 shares of Common Stock at an
exercise price of $3.37 per share. Mr. Barse disclaims beneficial ownership
of the shares of Common Stock owned by TAM and, therefore, these shares are
not held in escrow by DHC.

(7) Includes 20,000 shares of restricted stock issued to Mr. Huber on May 29,
2002, of which one-third have vested. Also includes shares underlying
currently exercisable options to purchase 13,333 shares of Common Stock at
an exercise price of $4.26 per share.

(8) Includes 152,457 shares owned by Salmon Atlas, a partnership controlled by
Mr. Isenberg and his wife. Includes shares underlying options to purchase
an aggregate of 13,334 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $4.00
per share.

(9) Includes shares underlying currently exercisable options to purchase an
aggregate of 22,800 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $4.00
per share.

(10) Includes shares underlying currently exercisable options to purchase an
aggregate of 40,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $5.78
per share and an aggregate of 13,333 shares of Common Stock at an exercise
price of $4.26 per share.

(11) Includes shares underlying currently exercisable options to purchase an
aggregate of 5,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $4.00 per
share.

(12) Includes 2,600,372 shares beneficially owned by TAM, as the sole investment
advisor to TAVF and by separate accounts managed by TAM; 170,509 shares
beneficially owned by Martin J. Whitman LLC ("MJW"), a private investment
company; and 134,587 shares beneficially owned by Mr. Whitman's wife and
three adult family members. Mr. Whitman may be deemed to control TAM. Mr.
Whitman is the principal stockholder in MJW and may be deemed to own
beneficially the shares owned by MJW. Mr. Whitman disclaims beneficial
ownership of the shares of Common Stock owned by TAM and owned by Mr.
Whitman's family members and, therefore, these shares are not held in
escrow by DHC.

(13) Includes shares underlying currently exercisable options to purchase an
aggregate of 13,333 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $4.26
per share.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

EMPLOYMENT ARRANGEMENTS

In connection with his announced retirement as of October 31, 2003, a
separation agreement was entered into between Michael C. Hagan and ACL. Under
this agreement, Mr. Hagan agreed, among other things, that he would (i) not
compete with or solicit employees or customers from ACL during the period from
the date of his retirement through June 30, 2004, and (ii) release ACL from all
claims he may have against ACL, including any claims relating to his employment
with and his separation from ACL, arising under any employment benefit program
of ACL, relating to any severance or similar benefit program of ACL, and arising

99

under any age discrimination laws. Under this separation agreement, Mr. Hagan
also agreed to provide certain consulting services to ACL through June 30, 2004,
including, advising ACL on asset dispositions, its bankruptcy proceedings, and
certain customer and business transitional matters. In exchange for his
agreements under this separation agreement, including his agreement not to
compete with ACL and his release of claims, Mr. Hagan received $275,000 in
addition to a $25,000 per month payment for his consulting services to be
performed thereunder. Mr. Hagan also will participate in ACL's group medical and
dental insurance plans for 2 years after his separation and maintain his
participation under ACL's pension plan and 401(k) plan.

Also in connection with his retirement from ACL, DHC has agreed with Mr.
Hagan to extend the period during which Mr. Hagan can exercise options to
acquire 26,250 shares of Common Stock to the one-year period running from his
retirement date through October 31, 2004. Under this agreement, DHC and Mr.
Hagan have mutually agreed to waive and release the other from all claims that
may have existed between them, other than any arising under DHC's or any of its
subsidiaries' indemnification obligations to its current and former directors,
members, officers or board of representative members.

AFFILIATE AGREEMENTS

DHC has agreed to provide SZ Investments unlimited demand registration
rights with respect to the ACL Senior Notes and ACL PIK Notes held by SZ
Investments and its affiliates. The selling noteholder, HYI, is an affiliate of
SZ Investments. Mr. Zell, DHC's President and Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the DHC's Board, and Mr. Tinkler, DHC's Chief Financial Officer, are
affiliated with SZ Investments and HYI. Mr. Pate, a member of DHC's Board, is
affiliated with SZ Investments.

Prior to and shortly after the acquisition of ACL, DHC shared certain
personnel and facilities with several affiliated and unaffiliated companies who
have certain common directors and officers, and certain expenses were allocated
among the various entities. Personnel costs were allocated based upon actual
time spent on DHC business. Costs relating to office space and equipment were
allocated based upon actual usage. DHC believes the methodology used for
allocation was appropriate. Total expenses allocated to DHC from affiliated
entities were $1.7 million for the year ended December 27, 2002.

DHC has entered into a corporate services agreement dated as of September
2, 2003, pursuant to which EGI has agreed to provide certain administrative
services to DHC, including, among others, shareholder relations, insurance
procurement and management, payroll services, cash management and treasury
functions, technology services, listing exchange compliance and financial and
corporate record keeping. Under the agreement, DHC pays to EGI $20,000 per month
plus certain out-of-pocket fees and expenses incurred by EGI under this
corporate services agreement. Either party may terminate this corporate services
agreement on 30 days written notice.

As part of the investment and purchase agreement dated as of December 2,
2003 pursuant to which DHC agreed to acquire Covanta, DHC arranged for a new
$118 million replacement letter of credit facility for Covanta, secured by a
second lien on Covanta's domestic assets. This financing was provided by the
Bridge Lenders; SZ Investments, L.L.C. ("SZ Investments"), Third Avenue Trust,
on behalf of Third Avenue Value Fund Series ("Third Avenue") and D. E. Shaw
Laminar Portfolios, L.L.C., a significant creditor of Covanta ("Laminar"). Each
of SZ Investments, Third Avenue and Laminar or an affiliate own over 5% of DHC's
Common Stock. Samuel Zell, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief
Executive Officer of DHC, Philip G. Tinkler, Chief Financial Officer of DHC and
William Pate, a director of DHC, are affiliated with SZ Investments. Martin
Whitman and David Barse, directors of DHC, are affiliated with Third Avenue.

DHC obtained the financing for its acquisition of Covanta pursuant to a
note purchase agreement dated December 2, 2003, from the Bridge Lenders.
Pursuant to the note purchase agreement, the Bridge Lenders provided DHC with
$40 million of bridge financing in exchange for notes issued by DHC. In the
event that DHC is unable to repay all or a portion of the notes pursuant to a
planned rights offering of Common Stock, then the notes are convertible without
action by the Bridge Lenders into shares of Common Stock at a price of $1.53 per
share subject to certain agreed upon limitations necessitated by DHC's NOLs.
These notes have a scheduled maturity date of January 2, 2005 and an extended
maturity date of July 15, 2005, and bear interest at a rate of 12% per annum
through July 15, 2004 and 16% per annum thereafter. In the event of a default or

100

the failure to pay a convertible note on its maturity, the interest rate under
the convertible note increases by 2%. In consideration for the $40 million of
bridge financing and the arrangement by the Bridge Lenders of the $118 million
second lien credit facility and the arrangement by Laminar of a $10 million
international revolving credit facility secured by Covanta's international
assets, DHC issued to the Bridge Lenders an aggregate of 5,120,853 shares of
Common Stock.

At the time that DHC entered into the note purchase agreement, agreed to
issue the notes convertible into shares of Common Stock and issued the equity
compensation to the Bridge Lenders, the Common Stock was trading on the American
Stock Exchange at a price of $1.40 per share, which was below the $1.53 per
share conversion price of the notes. DHC has agreed with the Bridge Lenders to
file a registration statement with the SEC to register the shares of Common
Stock issued to them under the note purchase agreement not later than the
earlier of June 30, 2004 and ten days after closing of the rights offering.

In addition, under the note purchase agreement Laminar has agreed to
convert an amount of convertible notes to acquire up to an additional 8.75
million shares of the Common Stock at $1.53 per share based upon the levels of
public participation in the rights offering.

As part of DHC's negotiations with Laminar and their becoming a 5%
shareholder, pursuant to a letter agreement dated December 2, 2003, Laminar has
agreed to transfer restrictions on the shares of Common Stock that Laminar holds
or will acquire. Further in accordance with the transfer restrictions contained
in Article Five of DHC's charter restricting the resale of Common Stock by 5%
stockholders, DHC has agreed with Laminar to provide it with limited rights to
resell the common stock that it holds.

The note purchase agreement and other transactions involving the Bridge
Lenders were negotiated, reviewed and approved by a special committee of DHC's
Board of Directors composed solely of disinterested directors and advised by
independent legal and financial advisors.

The arrangements described above are each on terms and conditions that DHC
believes are in the aggregate not materially more burdensome to DHC than would
be obtained on an arm's-length basis among unaffiliated parties.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The following table presents the aggregate fees for audit, audit related,
tax and other services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP for the years ended
December 31, 2003 and December 27, 2002:

Audit services included the audits of the consolidated financial statements
of DHC and review of financial statements included in DHC's Form 10-Qs. Audit
services also included services that are normally provided by the independent
auditor in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for
each of the referenced years. Fees include statutory and financial audits for
subsidiaries.

Audit-related services are for assurance and related services that are
reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of DHC's financial
statements. These services were primarily related to financial statement audits
of ACL's and NAICC's employee benefit plans in both 2003 and 2002, as well as
accounting consultations in connection with the Covanta acquisition and ACL
bankruptcy considerations in 2003.

101

Tax services fees in 2003 were related principally to tax compliance
services for U.S. federal and state and foreign tax returns, as well as tax
consulting services for subsidiaries. Tax services fees in 2002 were for tax
compliance and consulting services.

Ernst & Young LLP did not bill any fees that would be categorized as "all
other fees" during either of the years ended December 31, 2003 and December 27,
2002.

The Audit Committee has established a policy in 2003 to review and
pre-approve all auditing services and permitted non-audit services. The Chair of
the Audit Committee may pre-approve the rendering of services on behalf of the
Audit Committee, provided the matter is then presented to the full Audit
Committee at the next scheduled meeting.

All of Ernst & Young's 2003 audit fees were approved by the Audit
Committee. The Audit Committee has considered and concluded that the provision
of non-audit services is compatible with maintaining the independence of Ernst &
Young LLP.

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a) Documents filed as part of this report:

(1) CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION:

Included in Part II of this Report:

Consolidated Statement of Operations, for the years ended December 31,
2003, December 27, 2002 and December 31, 2001.

Consolidated Statement of Financial Position, as of December 31, 2003
and December 27, 2002.

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, for the years ended December 31,
2003, December 27, 2002 and December 31, 2001.

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity, for the years ended
December 31, 2003, December 27, 2002 and December 31, 2001.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, for the years ended December
31, 2003, December 27, 2002 and December 31, 2001.

Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors, on the consolidated
financial statements of Danielson Holding Corporation for the years
ended December 31, 2003 and December 27, 2002.

Report of KPMG LLP, Independent Accountants, on the consolidated
financial statements of Danielson Holding Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 2001.

(2) FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES OF DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

Included in Part II of this report:

Schedule I -- Condensed Financial Information of Registrant

Schedule II -- Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

Schedule V -- Supplemental Information Concerning Property -- Casualty
Insurance Operations

Included, beginning on page 111 of this report:

Consolidated Financial Statements of American Commercial Lines LLC:

Consolidated Statement of Operations, for the year ended December 26,
2003, the period from December 29, 2001 to May 28, 2002, the period
from May 29, 2002 to December 27, 2002 and the year ended December
28, 2001.

102

Consolidated Statement of Financial Position, as of December 26, 2003
and December 27, 2002.

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, for the year ended December 26,
2003, the period from December 29, 2001 to May 28, 2002, the period
from May 29, 2002 to December 27, 2002 and the year ended December
28, 2001.

Consolidated Statement of Member's (Deficit) Equity, for the year
ended December 26, 2003, the period from December 29, 2001 to May 28,
2002, the period from May 29, 2002 to December 27, 2002 and the year
ended December 28, 2001.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, for the year ended
December 26, 2003, the period from December 29, 2001 to May 28, 2002,
the period from May 29, 2002 to December 27, 2002 and the year ended
December 28, 2001.

Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors, on the
consolidated financial statements of American Commercial Lines, LLC
for the year ended December 26, 2003 and the periods from December
29, 2001 to May 28, 2002 and May 29, 2002 to December 27, 2002.

Report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Independent Accountants, on the
consolidated financial statements of American Commercial Lines, LLC
for the year ended December 28, 2001.

All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, not
significant or not required, or because the required information is
included in the financial statement notes thereto.

(3) EXHIBITS

103

104

105

106

107

108

- ---------------

+ Not filed herewith. In accordance with Rule 12b-32 of the General Rules and
Regulations under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, reference is made
to the document previously filed with the Commission.

* Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement.

(b) DHC filed a current report on Form 8-K dated November 7, 2003 to file
its press release announcing its earnings for the quarter ended
September 20, 3003. DHC filed a current report on Form 8-K dated
December 2, 2003 to report its proposed acquisition of Covanta.

(c) Exhibits: See Index to Exhibits.

109

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Danielson Holding Corporation
(Registrant)

By: /s/ SAMUEL ZELL
--------------------------------------
Samuel Zell
President and Chief Executive Officer

March 15, 2004

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

110

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION AS OF JANUARY 31, 2003)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

FISCAL FISCAL
YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 26, MAY 29, 2002 TO DECEMBER 29, 2001 DECEMBER 28,
2003 DECEMBER 27, 2002 TO MAY 28, 2002 2001
---- ----------------- --------------- ----

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
OPERATING REVENUE
Revenue $ 609,663 $ 420,013 $ 279,807 $729,692
Revenue from Related Parties 10,408 8,034 4,998 58,809
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------
620,071 428,047 284,805 788,501
OPERATING EXPENSE
Materials, Supplies and Other 273,803 184,332 138,092 341,606
Restructuring Cost - 565 13,493 -
Rent 37,044 29,896 23,121 56,711
Labor and Fringe Benefits 148,474 97,021 65,760 166,041
Fuel 83,427 49,348 30,434 93,560
Depreciation and Amortization 54,918 37,407 21,824 55,497
Gain on Property Dispositions, Net (287) - (455) (16,498)
Taxes, Other Than Income Taxes 22,325 15,485 10,926 26,223
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------
Total Operating Expenses 619,704 414,054 303,195 723,140
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) 367 13,993 (18,390) 65,361

OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME)
Interest Expense ($71,106 Contractual Interest for 2003) 41,514 35,944 25,712 70,932
Other, Net (6,016) 3,307 827 (359)
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------
35,498 39,251 26,539 70,573
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------
LOSS BEFORE REORGANIZATION ITEMS, INCOME TAXES,
AND CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF ACCOUNTING CHANGE (35,131) (25,258) (44,929) (5,212)

REORGANIZATION ITEMS 24,344 - - -
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND CUMULATIVE EFFECT
OF ACCOUNTING CHANGE (59,475) (25,258) (44,929) (5,212)

INCOME TAXES (BENEFIT) 2,101 743 (919) 118
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------

LOSS BEFORE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF ACCOUNTING CHANGE (61,576) (26,001) (44,010) (5,330)

CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF ACCOUNTING CHANGE - - - (490)
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------
NET LOSS $ (61,576) $ (26,001) $ (44,010) $ (5,820)
========== ========== ========== =========

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.

-111-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION AS OF JANUARY 31, 2003)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION

DECEMBER 26, DECEMBER 27,
2003 2002
---- ----
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

ASSETS

CURRENT ASSETS

Cash and Cash Equivalents $ 35,275 $ 14,496
Cash, Restricted 7,754 6,328
Accounts Receivable, Net 74,204 40,884
Accounts Receivable - Related Parties 6,356 11,494
Materials and Supplies 33,090 34,384
Other Current Assets 15,539 25,809
------------------ ------------------
Total Current Assets 172,218 133,395

PROPERTIES-Net 540,144 585,785
PENSION ASSETS 21,824 20,806
INVESTMENT IN EQUITY INVESTEES 57,862 55,677
OTHER ASSETS 20,148 15,978
------------------ ------------------
Total Assets $ 812,196 $ 811,641
================== ==================

LIABILITIES

LIABILITIES NOT SUBJECT TO COMPROMISE
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable $ 21,833 $ 33,301
Accrued Payroll and Fringe Benefits 14,075 15,713
Deferred Revenue 8,180 10,364
Accrued Claims and Insurance Premiums 4,924 26,547
Accrued Interest 5,184 16,429
Short-Term Debt - 41,000
Current Portion of Long-Term Debt 84,996 553,620
Other Liabilities 25,456 35,423
Other Liabilities - Related Parties 24 168
------------------ ------------------
Total Current Liabilities 164,672 732,565

Pension Liability 21,516 15,072
Other Liabilities 18,162 19,982
------------------ ------------------
Total Liabilities Not Subject to Compromise 204,350 767,619

LIABILITIES SUBJECT TO COMPROMISE
Accounts Payable 34,759 -
Accrued Claims and Insurance Premiums 4,506 -
Accrued Interest 10,762 -
Short-Term Debt 46,146 -
Current Portion of Long-Term Debt 528,449 -
Other Liabilities 2,898 -
------------------ ------------------
Total Liabilities Subject to Compromise 627,520 -

------------------ ------------------
Total Liabilities 831,870 767,619
------------------ ------------------

MEMBER'S (DEFICIT) EQUITY

Member's Interest 85,025 85,025
Other Capital 1,021 1,429
Unearned Compensation (289) (1,132)
Retained Deficit (87,577) (26,001)
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (17,854) (15,299)
------------------ ------------------
Total Member's (Deficit) Equity (19,674) 44,022
------------------ ------------------

Total Liabilities and Member's (Deficit) Equity $ 812,196 $ 811,641
================== ==================

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.

-112-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION AS OF JANUARY 31, 2003)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

FISCAL YEAR MAY 29, 2002 DECEMBER 29, FISCAL YEAR
ENDED TO 2001 ENDED
DECEMBER 26, DECEMBER 27, TO MAY 28, DECEMBER 28,
2003 2002 2002 2001
---- ---- ---- ----
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

Net Loss $ (61,576) $ (26,001) $ (44,010) $ (5,820)

Adjustments to Reconcile Net Loss to Net Cash
Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities:
Depreciation and Amortization 54,918 37,407 21,824 55,497
Interest Accretion and Debt Issuance Cost Amortization 8,877 4,033 1,245 4,413
Gain on Property Dispositions (287) - (455) (16,498)
Other Operating Activities (4,170) 2,751 (5,422) (1,735)
Reorganization Items 24,344 - - -
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:
Accounts Receivable (36,465) (10,100) (3,240) (12,010)
Materials and Supplies 2,281 2,111 (5,160) (1,384)
Accrued Interest 6,485 15,407 10,332 413
Other Current Assets (1,517) 6,366 (3,149) (4,998)
Other Liabilities 12,803 (5,396) 8,357 6,710
----------- ---------- ---------- ------------
Net Cash Provided by (Used In) Operating Activities
before Reorganization Items 5,693 26,578 (19,678) 24,588

Reorganization Items Paid (21,759) - - -
----------- ---------- ---------- ------------
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Operating Activities (16,066) 26,578 (19,678) 24,588
----------- ---------- ---------- ------------

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Property Additions (9,209) (7,757) (5,605) (19,772)
Investment in Vessel Leasing LLC - - - (6,808)
Proceeds from Property Dispositions 2,422 1,089 988 23,918
Net Change in Restricted Cash (1,426) 236 - -
Proceeds from Sale of Terminals - - - 7,818
Proceeds from Property Condemnation - - - 2,730
Other Investing Activities (3,604) (894) (2,859) (4,594)
----------- ---------- ---------- ------------
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing Activities (11,817) (7,326) (7,476) 3,292

FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Danielson Holding Corporation Investment - - 25,000 -
Short-Term Borrowings 5,146 7,000 - 17,250
DIP Credit Facility Borrowings 50,000 - - -
Long-Term Debt Repaid (3,204) (28,353) (25,190) (47,937)
Bank Overdrafts 325 (1,785) 1,149 (6,670)
Debt Costs (3,001) (1,035) - (3,463)
Other Financing Activities (604) (1,468) (173) 625
----------- ---------- ---------- ------------
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities 48,662 (25,641) 786 (40,195)
----------- ---------- ---------- ------------

Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents 20,779 (6,389) (26,368) (12,315)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period 14,496 20,885 47,253 59,568
----------- ---------- ---------- ------------
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period $ 35,275 $ 14,496 $ 20,885 $ 47,253
=========== ========== ========== ============

Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
Interest Paid $27,708 $13,061 $36,595 $65,504
Income Taxes Paid 3,343 306 1,104 1,175

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.

-113-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION AS OF JANUARY 31, 2003)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF MEMBER'S (DEFICIT) EQUITY

ACCUMULATED
RETAINED OTHER
MEMBER'S OTHER UNEARNED EARNINGS COMPREHENSIVE
INTEREST CAPITAL COMPENSATION (DEFICIT) INCOME (LOSS) TOTAL
-------- ------- ------------ --------- ------------- -----
(DOLLARS IN
THOUSANDS)

Balance at December 29, 2000 $ 220,074 $ 163,799 $ - $ (526,007) $ (484) $ (142,618)

Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change
as of December 30, 2000 - - - - (300) (300)

Comprehensive Loss:
Net loss - - - (5,820) - (5,820)
Net loss on fuel swaps designated as
cash flow hedging instruments - - - - (271) (271)
Net loss on interest rate swaps
designated as cash flow
hedging instruments - - - - (747) (747)
Foreign currency translation - - - - (55) (55)
-------- ------- ------ --------- --------- ---------
Total Comprehensive Loss - - - (5,820) (1,073) (6,893)

Contribution of capital by CSX - 2,781 - - - 2,781
Consolidation of ACL Funding Corp. - - - (989) - (989)
-------- ------- ------ --------- --------- ---------
Balance at December 28, 2001 220,074 166,580 - (532,816) (1,857) (148,019)
-
Comprehensive Loss: -
Net loss - - - (44,010) - (44,010)
Net gain on fuel swaps designated as -
cash flow hedging instruments - - - - 174 174
Net gain on interest rate swaps -
designated as cash flow
hedging instruments - - - - 228 228
Foreign currency translation - - - - (219) (219)
-------- ------- ------ --------- --------- ---------
Total Comprehensive Loss - - - (44,010) 183 (43,827)

Other - (373) - - - (373)
-------- ------- ------ --------- --------- ---------
Balance at May 28, 2002 220,074 166,207 - (576,826) (1,674) (192,219)

Elimination of historical equity (220,074) (166,207) - 576,826 1,674 192,219
Acquisition of ACL by Danielson
Holding Corporation 82,256 - - - - 82,256
Acquisition of Vessel Leasing 2,769 - - - - 2,769
Issuance of restricted Parent
Company common stock - 1,695 (1,695) - - -
Amortization of unearned compensation - - 297 - - 297
Cancellation of restricted Parent
Company common stock - (266) 266 - - -

Comprehensive Loss:
Net loss - - - (26,001) - (26,001)
Net gain on fuel swaps designated as
cash flow hedging instruments - - - - 68 68
Net loss on interest rate swaps
designated as cash flow
hedging instruments - - - - (290) (290)
Foreign currency translation - - - - 408 408
Minimum pension liability adjustment - - - - (15,485) (15,485)
-------- ------- ------ --------- --------- ---------
Total Comprehensive Loss - - - (26,001) (15,299) (41,300)
-------- ------- ------ --------- --------- ---------
Balance at December 27, 2002 85,025 1,429 (1,132) (26,001) (15,299) 44,022

Amortization of unearned compensation - - 435 - - 435
Cancellation of restricted Parent
Company common stock - (408) 408 - - -

Comprehensive Loss:
Net loss - - - (61,576) - (61,576)
Net gain on fuel swaps designated as
cash flow hedging instruments - - - - 452 452
Net gain on interest rate swaps
designated as
cash flow hedging instruments - - - - 440 440
Foreign currency translation - - - - 504 504
Minimum pension liability adjustment - - - - (3,951) (3,951)
-------- ------- ------ --------- --------- ---------
Total Comprehensive Loss - - - (61,576) (2,555) (64,131)
-------- ------- ------ --------- --------- ---------
Balance at December 26, 2003 $ 85,025 $ 1,021 $ (289) $ (87,577) $ (17,854) $ (19,674)
======== ======= ====== ========= ========= =========

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.

-114-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION AS OF JANUARY 31, 2003)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

NOTE 1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND PROCEEDINGS UNDER CHAPTER 11 OF THE BANKRUPTCY
CODE

NATURE OF OPERATIONS

The operations of American Commercial Lines LLC ("ACL") include barge
transportation together with related terminal, marine construction and vessel
repair along the inland waterways. Barge transportation services include the
movement of steel and other bulk products, grain, coal, and liquids in the
United States and South America, and account for the majority of ACL's revenues.
Marine construction, repair and terminal services are provided to customers in
marine transportation and other related industries in the United States. ACL has
long-term contracts with some customers.

ACL was a wholly-owned subsidiary of CSX Corporation ("CSX") until June 30,
1998. On June 30, 1998 ACL's parent, American Commercial Lines Holdings LLC (the
"Parent") completed a recapitalization in a series of transactions in which the
barge business of Vectura Group, Inc. ("Vectura") and its subsidiaries ("NMI" or
the "NMI Contribution") were combined with that of ACL.

On May 29, 2002, American Commercial Lines Holding LLC ("ACL Holdings"), ACL's
parent company, and ACL completed a comprehensive restructuring involving the
acquisition and recapitalization of ACL Holdings and ACL (the "Danielson
Recapitalization") by Danielson Holding Corporation ("DHC") and its subsidiaries
(collectively with DHC, "Danielson") and the restructuring of ACL's outstanding
debt obligations (see Note 6). Consulting fees and legal costs incurred in
connection with the Danielson Recapitalization are included in restructuring
costs in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.

PROCEEDINGS UNDER CHAPTER 11 OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE

During 2002 and 2003, ACL experienced a decline in barging rates, reduced
shipping volumes and excess barging capacity during a period of slow economic
growth. Due to these factors, ACL's revenues and earnings did not meet
expectations and ACL's liquidity was significantly impaired. Debt covenant
violations occurred as discussed in Note 6 and as a result, ACL was unable to
meet its financial obligations as they became due. On January 31, 2003 (the
"Petition Date"), ACL filed a petition with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Indiana, New Albany Division (the "Bankruptcy Court") to
reorganize under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (the "Bankruptcy Code"
or "Chapter 11") under case number 03-90305. Included in the filing are ACL,
ACL's direct parent (American Commercial Lines Holdings LLC), American
Commercial Barge Line LLC, Jeffboat LLC, Louisiana Dock Company LLC and ten
other U.S. subsidiaries of ACL (collectively with ACL, the "Debtors") under case
numbers 03-90306 through 03-90319. These cases are jointly administered for
procedural purposes before the Bankruptcy Court under case number 03-90305. The
Chapter 11 petitions do not cover any of ACL's foreign subsidiaries or certain
of its U.S. subsidiaries.

ACL and the other Debtors are continuing to operate their businesses as
debtors-in-possession under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in
accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and orders of
the Bankruptcy Court. As debtors-in-possession, the Debtors may not engage in
transactions outside of the ordinary course of business without approval, after
hearing, of the Bankruptcy Court. As part of the Chapter 11 cases, the Debtors
intend to develop and propose for confirmation pursuant to Chapter 11 a plan of
reorganization that will restructure the operations and liabilities of the
Debtors to the extent necessary to result in the continuing viability of ACL. A
filing date for such a plan has not been determined; however, the Debtors have
the exclusive right to file a plan of reorganization at any time on or before
March 28, 2004. If the exclusive filing period were to expire, other parties,
such as ACL creditors, would have the right to propose alternative plans of
reorganization. During the pendency of these Chapter 11 cases, the Debtors have
routinely requested extension of the exclusivisity period. Such extensions have
been granted with the support of the Debtors' creditors. The Debtors intend to
file for an additional extension of the exclusivity period beyond the current
March 28, 2004 date, as may be necessary.

The Debtors' direct and indirect foreign subsidiaries and foreign joint venture
entities did not file petitions under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code and are
not debtors-in-possession. Two other entities in which ACL has an ownership
interest, Vessel Leasing LLC and Global Materials Services LLC, also did not
file petitions under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code and are not
debtors-in-possession.

Qualifying pension and 401k plan funds are held in trust and protected under
federal regulations. All required contributions are current in the respective
plans.

-115-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION AS OF JANUARY 31, 2003)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)

The Debtors have entered into a Revolving Credit and Guaranty Agreement ("DIP
Credit Facility") that provides up to $75 million of financing during ACL's
Chapter 11 proceeding. As of December 26, 2003, participating bank commitments
under the DIP Credit Facility total $75 million, consisting of a $50 million
term loan and a $25 million revolving credit facility. Of this amount, the
Debtors have fully drawn the $50 million term loan, which was used to retire
ACL's Pre-Petition Receivables Facility (see Note 5) and which continues to be
used to fund the Debtors' day-to-day cash needs. The Debtors have made no draws
against the revolving credit facility. Total amounts drawn under the DIP Credit
Facility are limited by a borrowing base (as defined in the DIP Credit
Facility). The borrowing base limit was $56 million as of December 26, 2003 and
is updated weekly. The DIP Credit Facility is secured by the same and additional
assets that collateralized the Senior Credit Facilities and ACL's Pre-Petition
Receivables Facility, and bears interest, at ACL's option, at London Inter Bank
Offered Rates ("LIBOR") plus four percent or an Alternate Base Rate (as defined
in the DIP Credit Facility) plus three percent. There are also certain interest
rates in the event of a default under the facility.

The obligations of the Debtors under the DIP Credit Facility, by court order,
have super-priority administrative claim status as provided under the Bankruptcy
Code. Under the Bankruptcy Code, a super-priority claim is senior to secured and
unsecured pre-petition claims and all administrative expenses incurred in the
Chapter 11 case. In addition, with certain exceptions (including a carve-out for
unpaid professional fees and disbursements), the DIP Credit Facility obligations
are secured by (1) a first-priority lien on all unencumbered pre- and
post-petition property of the Debtors, (2) a first-priority priming lien on all
property of the Debtors that is encumbered by the existing liens securing the
Debtors' pre-petition secured lenders and (3) a junior lien on all other
property of the Debtors that is encumbered by the pre-petition liens.

The DIP Credit Facility also contains certain restrictive covenants that, among
other things, restrict the Debtors' ability to incur additional indebtedness or
guarantee the obligations of others. ACL is also required to maintain minimum
cumulative EBITDA, as defined in the DIP Credit Facility, limit its capital
expenditures to defined levels and restrict advances to certain subsidiaries.

The DIP Credit Facility will terminate and the borrowings thereunder will be due
and payable upon the earliest of (i) July 31, 2004 (with borrowings repayable on
August 2, 2004), (ii) the date of the substantial consummation of a plan of
reorganization that is confirmed pursuant to an order by the Bankruptcy Court,
or (iii) the acceleration of the term loans or the revolving credit loans made
by any of the banks who are a party to the DIP Credit Facility and the
termination of the total commitment under the DIP Credit Facility pursuant to
the DIP Credit Facility.

As a result of the Chapter 11 filings, certain events of default under the
Senior Credit Facilities, Senior Notes, PIK Notes and Old Senior Notes (see Note
6) have occurred, the effects of which are stayed pursuant to certain provisions
of the Bankruptcy Code.

Under Chapter 11, actions by creditors to collect claims in existence at the
filing date are stayed or deferred absent specific Bankruptcy Court
authorization to pay such pre-petition claims while the Debtors continue to
manage their businesses as debtors-in-possession and act to develop a plan of
reorganization for the purpose of emerging from these proceedings. The Debtors
have received approval from the Bankruptcy Court to pay or otherwise honor
certain of its pre-petition obligations, including but not limited to employee
wages and certain employee benefits, certain critical vendor payments, certain
insurance and claim obligations and certain tax obligations as a plan of
reorganization is developed. A claims bar date of December 5, 2003 was
established for all other pre-petition creditors to file a claim against the
estate of the various debtors. The Debtors are currently in the process of
reviewing the claims that were filed against the Debtors. The ultimate amount of
claims allowed by the Court against the Debtors could be significantly different
than the amount of the liabilities recorded by the Debtors.

The consolidated financial statements contained herein have been prepared in
accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement
of Position 90-7, "Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization under the
Bankruptcy Code" ("SOP 90-7"), assuming that ACL will continue as a going
concern. The claims in existence at the filing date are presented as Liabilities
Subject to Compromise in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Financial
Position.

-116-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION AS OF JANUARY 31, 2003)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)

The amount of the claims to be filed against the Debtors by their creditors
could be significantly different than the amount of the liabilities recorded by
the Debtors. The Debtors also have numerous executory contracts and other
agreements that could be assumed or rejected during the Chapter 11 proceedings.
Parties affected by these rejections may file claims with the Bankruptcy Court
in accordance with the reorganization process. Under these Chapter 11
proceedings, the rights of and ultimate payments to pre-petition creditors,
rejection damage claimants and ACL's equity investor may be substantially
altered. This could result in claims being liquidated in the Chapter 11
proceedings at less (possible substantially less) than 100% of their face value,
and the membership interests of ACL's equity investor being diluted or
cancelled. The Debtors have not yet proposed a plan of reorganization. The
Debtors' pre-petition creditors and ACL's equity investor will each have a vote
in the plan of reorganization.

The Chapter 11 process presents inherent material uncertainty; it is not
possible to determine the additional amount of claims that may arise or
ultimately be filed, or predict the length of time that the Debtors will
continue to operate under the protection of Chapter 11, the outcome of the
Chapter 11 proceedings in general, whether the Debtors will continue to operate
in their present organizational structure, or the effects of the proceedings on
the business of ACL, the other Debtors and its non-filing subsidiaries and
affiliates, or on the interests of the various creditors and equity holder. The
ultimate recovery, if any, by creditors and equity holder will not be determined
until confirmation of a plan or plans of reorganization. No assurance can be
given as to what value will be ascribed in the bankruptcy proceedings to each of
these constituencies.

Reorganization items, as reported in the accompanying consolidated statement of
operations are compromised of income, expense and loss items that were realized
or incurred by the Debtors as a direct result of the ACL's decision to
reorganize under Chapter 11. Pursuant to SOP 90-7, these items are aggregrated
and reported as a separate component of expense below operating income. For the
year ended December 26, 2003 , these items include:

REORGANIZATION ITEMS:

Professional Fees $ 16,740
Severance and Retention 1,486
Charter Guarantees 5,146
Interest Income (138)
Other Reorganization Items 1,110
--------
TOTAL REORGANIZATION ITEMS $ 24,344
========

The Debtors have received Bankruptcy Court approval for the retention of legal,
financial and management consulting professionals to advise the Debtors in the
bankruptcy proceedings and the restructuring of its business. In accordance with
the Bankruptcy Code, the creditors also have the right to retain their own
financial, legal and other professionals to provide these constituencies advice
during the pendency of the Chapter 11 cases. The Debtors are obligated to pay
the cost of the creditors' professionals. The professional fees above reflect
payment for those services in addition to the accrual of $1,250 toward a $2,500
success fee payable to one of the Debtor's financial advisors upon consummation
of the plan of reorganization.

The Debtors have also received Bankruptcy Court approval for the payment of a
retention bonus to certain key executives and the payment of a success fee bonus
to an executive upon consummation of the plan of reorganization and the
achievement of other performance goals. The expense for these items is $1,277 in
2003 and is included in the severance and retention amount presented above.

As a result of the bankruptcy filing, ACL has initially rejected certain barge
leases and other executory contracts. These rejections and the consequent
reduction in the size of the domestic barging fleet resulted in a number of
salary and vessel employee positions being eliminated. In addition, a number of
management changes were initiated to better position ACL to emerge from Chapter
11. The related severance expense and payments of $1,169 is included in the
severance and retention amount presented above. As a part of this process,
certain executives also released their claims to benefits under several
non-qualified executive compensation programs. The resultant gain of $960 is
also included in severance and retention.

-117-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION AS OF JANUARY 31, 2003)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)

As a result of the rejection of certain barge charter agreements due to the
Chapter 11 filing and the rights of the charter owners to rely upon letters of
credit to guarantee future payments of charter hire, draws totalling $5,146 were
made on the letters of credit.

Pursuant to SOP 90-7, interest income from cash on hand as a result of
debtor-in-possession financing is also presented as a reorganization item.

Other reorganization items include cost incurred related to the DIP Credit
Facility and expense from rejecting executory contracts.

NOTE 2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

In connection with Danielson becoming the owner of 100% of the membership
interests in ACLines LLC ("ACLines"), which wholly owns ACL Holdings, Danielson
elected to push down its basis of accounting to the net assets of ACL. ACL's net
assets, liabilities and member's equity have been adjusted, as of the
acquisition date, following push down accounting (see Note 3). Accordingly,
effective May 29, 2002, ACL's accounts have been adjusted to a new basis to
reflect Danielson's basis in ACL's assets and liabilities based on the estimated
fair values of such assets and liabilities using the principles of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 141, "Business Combinations."

As noted above, the consolidated financial statements contained herein have been
prepared in accordance with SOP 90-7, assuming that ACL will continue as a going
concern. ACL and certain of its subsidiaries are currently operating under the
jurisdiction of Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code and the Bankruptcy Court.
Continuation of ACL as a going concern is contingent upon, among other things,
ACL's ability to formulate a plan of reorganization which will gain approval of
the requisite parties under the Bankruptcy Code and confirmation by the
Bankruptcy Court, ACL's ability to continue to comply with the DIP Credit
Facility (see Note 1) and the ability of ACL to generate the required cash flows
from operations and, where necessary, obtain financing sources sufficient to
satisfy future obligations.

ACL's liquidity generally depends on cash provided by operating activities and
access to the DIP Credit Facility. The ability of ACL to continue as a going
concern (including its ability to meet post-petition obligations) and the
continued appropriateness of using the going concern basis for its financial
statements are dependent upon, among other things, (i) ACL's ability to comply
with the covenants of the DIP Credit Facility, (ii) the ability of ACL to
maintain adequate cash on hand, (iii) the ability of ACL to continue to generate
cash from operations, (iv) confirmation of a plan of reorganization under the
Bankruptcy Code and the terms of such plan, (v) ability of ACL to attract,
retain and compensate key executives and associates and to retain employees
generally and (vi) ACL's ability to achieve profitability following such
confirmation.

Management expects that normal cash flows from operations and access to the DIP
Credit Facility will be sufficient to meet planned working capital, capital
expenditures and other cash requirements until such time as it seeks to obtain
approval for a plan of reorganization. However, due to material uncertainties
associated with the outcome of the Chapter 11 proceedings in general, and the
effects of such proceedings on the business of ACL and its subsidiaries, there
can be no assurances that such plan will be approved or whether ACL will obtain
sufficient liquidity enabling it to continue to operate in its present
organizational structure.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not give effect to any
adjustment to the carrying value of assets or amounts and classifications of
liabilities that might be necessary as a result of resolving the bankruptcy. A
plan of reorganization could materially change the amounts recorded in the
consolidated financial statements in future periods.

PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

The consolidated financial statements reflect the results of operations, cash
flows and financial position of ACL and its majority-owned subsidiaries as a
single entity. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated. Investments in companies that are not majority-owned are accounted
for under the equity method, depending on the extent of control.

-118-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION AS OF JANUARY 31, 2003)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)

FISCAL YEAR

ACL follows an annual fiscal reporting period, which ends on the last Friday in
December.

USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

Cash and cash equivalents include short-term investments with a maturity of less
than three months when purchased. ACL has from time to time, cash in banks in
excess of federally insured limits.

RESTRICTED CASH

As part of the Maritime Administration guaranteed financing, Vessel Leasing LLC
("Vessel Leasing") is required to maintain a minimum cash balance on account
which amounted to $7,754 as of December 26, 2003 and $6,328 as of December 27,
2002.

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Accounts receivable consist of the following:

2003 2002
-------------------- --------------------

Accounts Receivable $ 75,838 $ 42,747
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts (1,634) (1,863)
-------------------- --------------------
$ 74,204 $ 40,884
==================== ====================

ACL maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon the expected
collectibility of accounts receivable. See Note 5 regarding repurchase of
receivables in 2003.

MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES

Materials and supplies are carried at the lower of cost (average) or market and
consist of the following:

2003 2002
-------------------- --------------------

Raw Materials $ 3,715 $ 3,818
Work in Process 15,227 15,577
Parts and Supplies 14,148 14,989
-------------------- --------------------
$ 33,090 $ 34,384
==================== ====================

PROPERTIES, DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION

Properties consist of the following:

2003 2002
-------------------- --------------------

Land $ 15,741 $ 11,050
Buildings and Improvements 24,674 16,537
Equipment 589,961 593,935
-------------------- --------------------
630,376 621,522
Less Accumulated Depreciation 90,232 35,737
-------------------- --------------------
$ 540,144 $ 585,785
==================== ====================

-119-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION AS OF JANUARY 31, 2003)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)

Properties are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. At May 29, 2002,
properties were fair valued in conjunction with the purchase price allocation.
Provisions for depreciation of properties are based on the estimated useful
service lives computed on the straight-line method. Buildings and improvements
are depreciated from 15 to 45 years. Equipment is depreciated from 5 to 42
years.

Properties and other long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever
events or business conditions indicate the carrying amount of such assets may
not be fully recoverable. Initial assessments of recoverability are based on
estimates of undiscounted future net cash flows associated with an asset or a
group of assets. Where impairment is indicated, the assets are evaluated for
sale or other disposition, and their carrying amount is reduced to fair value
based on discounted net cash flows or other estimates of fair value. Properties
include $720 for barges which have been removed from service during 2003. These
assets were written down to their estimated salvage value through a $2,078
charge to earnings which is included in materials, supplies and other in the
consolidated statement of operations. In addition, intangible assets were
written down, due to abandonment of a software project, through a $1,643 charge
to earnings which is also included in materials, supplies and other in the
consolidated statement of operations. There were no long-lived asset impairment
losses in 2002 and 2001.

Depreciation expense was $45,745 for fiscal year 2003, $20,500 for the period
December 29, 2001 through May 28, 2002, $35,737 for the period May 29, 2002
through December 27, 2002 and $52,100 for fiscal year 2001. Amortization
expense, relating to software and intangible assets which are included in other
assets, was $9,173 for fiscal year 2003; $1,324 for the period December 29, 2001
through May 28, 2002; $1,670 for the period May 29, 2002 through December 27,
2002 and $3,397 for fiscal year 2001. Remaining amortization related to
intangible assets amounts to $3,858 in 2004 and $3,858 in 2005. In conjunction
with the Bankruptcy filing, ACL rejected a substantial number of barge leases.
As such, 2003 amortization expense includes a charge of $1,213 for writing
favorable leases to zero. Depreciation and amortization expense for fiscal year
2003 was reduced by $4,397 due to changes in estimates in finalizing the
purchase price allocation.

In the fourth quarter of 2001, ACL changed the useful life of towboats from 30
years to 42 years, which reduced the net loss by $1,142 for the year ended
December 28, 2001. This change in accounting estimate was based on additional
information about the useful life of the towboat fleet.

DEBT AMORTIZATION

ACL amortizes debt costs over the term of the debt. Amortization expense was
$2,957 for fiscal year 2003, $1,245 for the period December 29, 2001 through May
28, 2002; $1,150 for the period May 29, 2002 through December 27, 2002; and
$4,413 for fiscal year 2001 and is included in interest expense in the
consolidated statement of operations.

DEBT DISCOUNT

On May 29, 2002 ACL issued new debt (see Note 6) which was recorded at fair
value. The difference between the principle amount of the notes and the fair
value (discount) is being amortized using the interest method over the life of
the notes. The amortization of the discount was $5,919 for fiscal year 2003 and
$2,882 for the period May 29, 2002 through December 27, 2002 and is included in
interest expense in the consolidated statement of operations.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

Barge transportation revenue is recognized proportionately as shipments move
from origin to destination. Terminal, repair and other revenue is recognized as
services are provided. Marine construction revenue and related expense is
primarily recognized on the completed-contract method, due to the short-term
nature of contracts. Revenue from sale/leaseback transactions, if any, is
deferred and recognized over the life of the lease.

REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE

Repairs that extend the original economic life of an asset or that enhance the
functionality of an asset are capitalized and amortized over their estimated
economic life. All other repairs and maintenance are expensed. Routine boat
engine overhauls that occur on a two to four year cycle are expensed when
incurred. Repair and maintenance expense was $27,492 for fiscal year 2003 ;
$14,357 for the period December 29, 2001 through May 28, 2002; $17,971 for the
period May 29, 2002 through December 27, 2002; and $32,581 for fiscal year 2001
and is included in materials, supplies and other expense in the consolidated
statement of operations.

FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION

Assets and liabilities relating to investments in foreign operations are
translated into U. S. dollars using current exchange rates; revenues and
expenses are translated into U. S. dollars using the average exchange rate
during the period. When the functional currency is the local currency, the
translation gains and losses are excluded from income and are recorded in the
other comprehensive income component of member's equity. If the functional
currency is the U. S. dollar, the translation gains and losses are recorded as
other income or expense in the consolidated statement of operations.

-120-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION AS OF JANUARY 31, 2003)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)

RECLASSIFICATIONS

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year
presentation.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In May 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
("SFAS") No. 150, "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with
Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity." SFAS No. 150 requires that
certain financial instruments, which under previous guidance were accounted for
as equity, must now be accounted for as liabilities. The financial instruments
affected include mandatorily redeemable stock, certain financial instruments
that require or may require the issuer to buy back some of its shares in
exchange for cash or other assets, and certain obligations that can be settled
with shares of stock. SFAS No. 150 is effective for financial instruments
entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and must be applied to the Company's
existing financial instruments effective June 30, 2003, the beginning of the
first interim period after June 15, 2003. The provisions of this statement did
not have an impact on ACL's financial statements in 2003.

In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB
Interpretation 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an
interpretation of ARB No. 51 (FIN 46). In December 2003, the FASB modified FIN
46 to make certain technical corrections and address certain implementation
issues that had arisen, including deferral of certain provisions to 2004. FIN 46
provides a new framework for identifying variable interest entities ("VIEs") and
determining when a company should include the assets, liabilities,
noncontrolling interests and results of activities of a VIE in its consolidated
financial statements.

In general, a VIE is a corporation, partnership, limited-liability corporation,
trust, or any other legal structure used to conduct activities or hold assets
that either (1) has an insufficient amount of equity to carry out its principal
activities without additional subordinated financial support, (2) has a group of
equity owners that are unable to make significant decisions about its
activities, or (3) has a group of equity owners that do not have the obligation
to absorb losses or the right to receive returns generated by its operations.

FIN 46 requires a VIE to be consolidated if a party with an ownership,
contractual or other financial interest in the VIE other financial interest in
the VIE ("a variable interest holder") is obligated to absorb a majority of the
risk of loss from the VIEs activities, is entitled to receive a majority of the
VIEs residual returns (if no party absorbs a majority of the VIEs losses), or
both. A variable interest holder that consolidates the VIE is called the primary
beneficiary. Upon consolidation, the primary beneficiary generally must
initially record all of the VIEs assets, liabilities and noncontrolling
interests at fair value and subsequently account for the VIE as if it were
consolidated based on majority voting interest. FIN 46 also requires disclosures
about VIEs that the variable interest holder is not required to consolidate but
in which it has a significant variable interest. FIN 46 was effective
immediately for VIEs created after January 31, 2003. The provisions of this
statement did not have an impact on ACL's financial statements in 2003. ACL
continues to assess what impact FIN 46 may have in 2004, but does not believe it
will have a significant impact.

In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146 "Accounting for Costs Associated with
Exit or Disposal Activities" ("SFAS 146"), which addresses financial accounting
and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and
nullifies EITF Issue No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee
Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain
Costs incurred in a Restructuring)" ("Issue 94-3"). The principal difference
between SFAS 146 and Issue 94-3 relates to SFAS 146's requirements for
recognition of a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal
activity. SFAS 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit
or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. Under Issue
94-3, a liability for an exit cost as generally defined in Issue 94-3 was
recognized at the date of an entity's commitment to an exit plan. Severance pay
under SFAS 146, in many cases, would be recognized over time rather than up
front.

Additionally, under SFAS 146, if the benefit arrangement requires employees to
render future service beyond a "minimum retention period," a liability should be
recognized as employees render service over the future service period even if
the benefit formula used to calculate an employee's termination benefit is based
on length of service. The provisions of SFAS 146 did not have an impact on ACL's
financial statements in 2003.

-121-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION AS OF JANUARY 31, 2003)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)

NOTE 3. DANIELSON ACQUISITION OF ACL

Danielson's basis in ACL's net assets at the acquisition date of $85,025
includes $7,000 in cash paid for membership interests in ACL Holdings; $2,769 in
cash paid for a 50% membership interest in Vessel Leasing LLC ("Vessel
Leasing"), an entity in which ACL owns the other 50% membership interest; the
contribution of $25,000 in cash and ACL 10 1/4% senior notes due June 30, 2008
having an estimated fair value of $43,650; and costs incurred by Danielson
directly associated with the acquisition of $6,606.

As a result of Danielson's acquisition of ACL and the push down purchase
accounting that resulted, ACL recorded several non-cash adjustments including
the following:

Properties $ 117,772
Net Pension Asset (5,426)
Investment in Equity Investees (11,793)
Other Assets (7,555)
----------
$ 92,998
==========

Short-Term Debt $ (50,000)
Accrued Interest (22,492)
Other Current Liabilities 3,112
Pension Liability (18,264)
Other Long-Term Liabilities (16,408)
Contribution of 10 1/4% senior notes
at par including accrued interest (64,082)
Long-Term Debt (13,343)
Equity 274,475
----------
$ 92,998
==========

The above adjustments reflect the estimated fair value of assets and liabilities
acquired by Danielson as of the date of the acquisition, May 29, 2002. In 2003,
management finalized the allocation of the Danielson purchase price based on
this fair value. The fair value of the assets exceeded the Danielson purchase
price by $128,165. This excess was allocated as a pro rata reduction to
individual assets based on fair value, excluding financial assets with the
exception of equity method investments, assets to be disposed of by sale,
prepaid assets related to pension plans and other current assets.

The pro forma unaudited results of operations for the years ended December 27,
2002 and December 28, 2001, assuming consummation of the acquisition as of
December 30, 2000, are as follows:

2002 2001
---- ----

Revenue $ 712,686 $ 747,526
Loss before cumulative effect of accounting change (76,039) (9,935)
Net loss (76,039) (8,540)

-122-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION AS OF JANUARY 31, 2003)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)

NOTE 4. INVESTMENT IN EQUITY INVESTEES

ACL has ownership interests in the following entities which are accounted for by
the equity method:

UABL LIMITED ("UABL") - ACL has a 50% ownership interest in UABL, an Argentine
company. UABL's operations include barge transportation services in Argentina,
Bolivia, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay.

GLOBAL MATERIALS SERVICES LLC ("GMS") - ACL has a 50% ownership interest in GMS
which is a joint venture between American Commercial Terminals-Memphis LLC, a
wholly owned subsidiary of American Commercial Terminals, which is a wholly
owned subsidiary of ACL, DHC, a 5.4% owner, and Mid-South Terminal Company,
L.P., an unaffiliated third party. GMS' principal operations include terminal
facilities along the inland waterways.

GLOBAL MATERIAL SERVICES VENEZUELA ("GMSV") - ACL has a 42% ownership interest
in GMSV. During 2002, GMS, ACL and minority owners organized new companies to
unload bauxite in Venezuela. The GMSV companies are Global Materials Services
Venezuela C.A., GMS Venezuela Terminal Partners LLC and GMS Venezuela Terminal
Holdings LLC. ACL contributed $1,417 in capital to GMSV in 2002.

VESSEL LEASING LLC ("Vessel Leasing") - In 2001, ACL and Vectura Group LLC
invested in a new company, Vessel Leasing. Prior to May 29, 2002, ACL accounted
for its investment in Vessel Leasing under the equity method. On May 29, 2002,
Danielson acquired the remaining 50% membership interest in Vessel Leasing for
$2,769 in cash. As a result, ACL consolidated the assets and liabilities of
Vessel Leasing in the consolidated statement of financial position beginning May
29, 2002. ACL has also included the net income of Vessel Leasing in the
consolidated statement of operations from the Danielson purchase date.

Earnings (losses) related to ACL's equity method investees aggregate $4,714 for
fiscal year 2003; ($272) for the period May 29, 2002 through December 27, 2002;
$642 for the period December 29, 2001 through May 28, 2002; and ($2,541) for the
fiscal year 2001. These earnings (losses) are included in other income in the
consolidated statement of operations.

ACL's most significant investments in equity investees relate to UABL and GMS
which amounted to $40,467 and $12,685, respectively, at December 26, 2003. The
excess of ACL's equity in the underlying net assets of UABL and GMS over its
investments in these entities amounted to $7,874 and $775, respectively, at
December 26, 2003. These differences are being amortized on a straight-line
basis over 20 years for UABL and 8 years for GMS as a component of the equity in
earnings of the investments.

The following is a summary of aggregated financial information for UABL and GMS:

December 26, December 27,
2003 2002
---- ----

Current assets $25,207 $16,937
Noncurrent assets 152,200 152,072
Current liabilities 25,317 34,538
Noncurrent liabilities 59,744 49,421

May 29, December 29,
Year Ended 2002 to 2001 Year Ended
December 26, December 27, to May 28, December 28,
2003 2002 2002 2001
---- ---- ---- ----

Revenue $111,078 $61,450 $35,671 $103,364
Operating income 10,475 2,272 2,982 3,117
Net earnings (loss) 5,367 (62) 235 (4,990)

-123-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION AS OF JANUARY 31, 2003)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)

NOTE 5. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE SECURITIZATION

ACL's receivables facility, which was administered by PNC Bank, N.A., was
replaced on May 29, 2002 with a Receivables Purchase Agreement among American
Commercial Lines Funding Corporation ("ACLF"), American Commercial Barge Line
LLC, Jupiter Securitization Corporation and Bank One, NA (the "Pre-Petition
Receivables Facility") having substantially the same terms as the old
receivables facility. As discussed in Note 1, the Pre-Petition Receivables
Facility was retired by ACL repurchasing $37,000 of receivables with proceeds
from the DIP Credit Facility.

At December 27, 2002, ACL had $39,300 outstanding under its accounts receivable
securitization facility agreement and had $27,590 of net residual interest in
the securitized receivables which is included in accounts receivable, net on the
consolidated statement of financial position. The fair value of the net residual
interest was measured at the time of the sale and was based on the sale of
similar assets. From December 29, 2001 through May 28, 2002 ACL received gross
proceeds of $3,800 from the sale of receivables and made gross payments of
$12,200 under the agreement in place during that period. From May 29, 2002
through December 29, 2002 ACL received gross proceeds of $20,300 and made gross
payments of $23,600 under the Pre-Petition Receivables Facility. In 2001, ACL
received gross proceeds of $30,800 from the sale of receivables and made gross
payments of $35,800 under the agreement in place during that period.

In September 2000, the FASB issued SFAS No. 140, "Accounting for Transfers and
Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities" ("SFAS 140").
The Statement was effective for transfers and servicing of financial assets and
extinguishments of liabilities occurring after March 31, 2001. ACL adopted SFAS
140 on April 1, 2001. The adoption required the consolidation of ACLF, a
wholly-owned subsidiary, that was previously treated as a non-consolidated
Qualified Special Purpose Entity. The consolidation resulted in a charge to
retained earnings of $989 in 2001.

NOTE 6. DEBT

DECEMBER 26, DECEMBER 27,
2003 2002
---- ----

Short-term debt not subject to compromise:
Revolving Credit Facility $ -- $ 41,000

Current portion of long-term debt not subject to compromise:
Debtor in Possession Term Loan B 50,000 --
Bonds guaranteed by the Maritime Administration 34,996 37,740
Tranche A Term Loan -- 43,119
Tranche B Term Loan -- 124,141
Tranche C Term Loan -- 146,069
New Senior Notes -- 128,491
Senior Subordinated Notes (PIK Notes) -- 68,797
Old Senior Notes -- 4,946
Other Notes -- 317
-------- --------
84,996 553,620
Short-term debt subject to compromise:
Revolving Credit Facility 46,146 --

Current portion of long-term debt subject to compromise:
Tranche A Term Loan 43,119 --
Tranche B Term Loan 124,141 --
Tranche C Term Loan 146,069 --
New Senior Notes 129,793 --
Senior Subordinated Notes (PIK Notes) 80,194 --
Old Senior Notes 5,133 --
-------- --------
528,449 --
-------- --------
Total Debt $659,591 $594,620
======== ========

-124-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION AS OF JANUARY 31, 2003)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)

DEBTOR IN POSSESSION AGREEMENT

As discussed above in Note 1, ACL and the other debtor subsidiaries entered into
a DIP Credit Facility that provides up to $75,000 of financing consisting of a
$50,000 term loan and a $25,000 revolving credit facility. The DIP Term Loan B
was drawn in 2003 pursuant to the bankruptcy filing. The loan is limited to
$50,000 and matures on July 31, 2004. No amounts have been drawn against the
revolving credit facility. The DIP Credit Facility contains a provision limiting
the total amount of outstanding loans under the facility based upon a borrowing
base calculation (as defined in the DIP Credit Facility). The borrowing base
limitation was $56,000 as of December 26, 2003 and is updated weekly. The DIP
Credit Facility is secured by the same and additional assets that collateralized
the Senior Credit Facilities (described below) and ACL's Pre-Petition
Receivables Facility, and bears interest, at ACL's option, at LIBOR plus four
percent or Alternate Base Rate (as defined in the DIP Credit Facility) plus
three percent. The interest rates as of December 26, 2003 ranged from 5.1875% to
5.25%. There are also certain interest rates in the event of a default under the
facility.

The DIP Credit Facility also contains certain restrictive covenants that, among
other things, limit the Debtors' ability to incur additional indebtedness or
guarantee the obligations of others. ACL is also required to maintain minimum
cumulative EBITDA, as defined in the DIP Credit Facility, limit its capital
expenditures to a defined level and restrict advances to certain subsidiaries.

PRE-PETITION SENIOR CREDIT FACILITIES

As a result of the Chapter 11 filings, certain events of default under the
Senior Credit Facilities, New Senior Notes, PIK Notes and Old Senior Notes (see
below) have occurred, the effects of which are stayed pursuant to certain
provisions of the Bankruptcy Code.

ACL's credit facilities as of April 11, 2002 were amended and restated (the
amended and restated credit facilities are hereafter referred to as the "Senior
Credit Facilities") to, among other things, modify financial and restrictive
covenants thereunder, prepay $25,000 of term loans (the "Term Loans") thereunder
from the $25,000 in cash contributed by Danielson and convert $50,000 of
revolving credit loans (the "Revolving Credit Facility") thereunder into a new
tranche of term loans having an interest rate and other terms substantially
similar to the revolving credit loans under ACL's old senior credit facilities.
The amended and restated credit agreement with ACL's senior secured lenders
contains mandatory prepayments of the term loans with net proceeds from certain
asset sales, equity issuances, incurrence of indebtedness and sale and leaseback
transactions, as well as excess cash flow, as defined in the credit agreement.

ACL also completed an exchange offer in 2002 (the "Exchange Offer") for the Old
Senior Notes, pursuant to which $284,500 or approximately 96.4%, of the
principal amount of ACL's Old Senior Notes were tendered, with the $58,493
principal amount of ACL's Old Senior Notes contributed by Danielson and its
subsidiaries to ACL Holdings being deemed tendered in the Exchange Offer.
Holders of Old Senior Notes who tendered their Old Senior Notes pursuant to the
Exchange Offer received approximately $134,700 aggregate principal amount of new
11.25% senior notes ("New Senior Notes") and approximately $112,900 aggregate
principal amount of 12% pay-in-kind senior subordinated notes ("PIK Notes"). The
debt exchange was not an extinguishment of debt for accounting purposes since
the terms of the new debt are not substantially different from the terms of the
Old Senior Notes exchanged.

Following the consummation of the Exchange Offer, a holder of $4,000 aggregate
principal amount of the Old Senior Notes exchanged such notes and accrued
interest for approximately $2,400 of New Senior Notes and approximately $2,000
of PIK Notes as permitted by the indentures governing the notes, following which
$6,500 of the Old Senior Notes remained outstanding.

Since ACL applied push down accounting effective with Danielson's acquisition of
ACL, ACL's debt was adjusted to fair value at the acquisition date. The
difference between the principal amount of the debt and its fair value is being
accreted as interest expense over the term of the debt under the effective
interest method.

The Revolving Credit Facility, which provides for revolving loans and letters of
credit not to exceed the aggregate principal amount of $49,470, matures June 30,
2005, but each loan must be repaid within one year. The Revolving Credit
Facility bears interest at a rate equal to LIBOR plus a margin based on ACL's
performance. The interest rates as of December 26, 2003 ranged from 6.4375% to
6.5%.

-125-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION AS OF JANUARY 31, 2003)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)

Tranche A Term Loans mature June 30, 2005. Tranche B Term Loans mature June 30,
2006. Tranche C Term Loans mature June 30, 2007. The Term Loans bear interest at
a rate equal to LIBOR plus a margin based on ACL's performance. The annual
interest rates as of December 26, 2003 were: Tranche A - 6.5%, Tranche B - 6.75%
and Tranche C - 7.0%. These rates are inclusive of a 1% payment-in-kind ("PIK")
interest rate which accrues from November 8, 2002 until the time of a
consummation of a plan of reorganization under Chapter 11. ACL is paying the
interest on the Senior Credit Facility as it becomes due. The 1% PIK interest
will be payable upon consummation of a plan of reorganization.

The New Senior Notes are due January 1, 2008 and bear interest at an annual rate
of 11.25%, payable semi-annually. The PIK Notes are due July 1, 2008 and bear
interest at an annual rate of 12%. ACL has the option of issuing new PIK Notes
in lieu of paying cash interest on such notes each June 30 and December 31 until
maturity. After 2 years from issuance, interest accretes at 13.5% per annum if
ACL elects to not pay the interest due in cash. The interest rate remains 12% if
the interest is paid in cash. The Old Senior Notes are due June 30, 2008 and
bear interest at an annual rate of 10.25%. Since the bankruptcy filing, ACL has
not accrued or paid interest on the new Senior Notes, PIK Notes or the Old
Senior Notes.

In connection with the Exchange Offer, ACL completed a consent solicitation of
the holders of the Old Senior Notes, which resulted in the elimination or
amendment of substantially all the restrictive covenants contained in the
indenture governing the Old Senior Notes, the subordination of the subsidiary
guarantees of the Old Senior Notes to the subsidiary guarantees of ACL's Senior
Credit Facilities, the New Senior Notes and the PIK Notes and the waiver of any
and all defaults under the indenture governing the Old Senior Notes through the
effective date of the exchange offer, May 29, 2002.

As noted above, DHC purchased the 50% equity interests that Vectura Group LLC
owned in Vessel Leasing at the time Danielson acquired ACL. Vessel Leasing,
which was formerly accounted for under the equity method is now consolidated
with ACL. Accordingly, the bonds issued by Vessel Leasing that are guaranteed by
the U.S. Maritime Administration are included in ACL's debt balance. Vessel
Leasing is not a debtor-in-possession and is a not a guarantor of the DIP Credit
Facility. Vessel Leasing's long-term debt is not guaranteed by ACL or any of
ACL's other subsidiaries.

ACL has an outstanding loan guarantee of $2,138 in the borrowings of one of its
equity investees, GMS Venezuela C.A., from the International Finance
Corporation.

The Senior Credit Facilities are secured by the assets of the guarantor
subsidiaries. The New Senior Notes and the PIK notes are unsecured. The Senior
Credit Facilities and the indentures governing the New Senior Notes and the PIK
Notes (the "Indentures") contain a number of covenants with specified financial
ratios and tests including, with respect to the Senior Credit Facilities,
maximum leverage ratios, rent adjusted maximum leverage ratios and interest
coverage ratios. The Indentures also contain certain cross default provisions.

On December 31, 2002, ACL elected to exercise its rights under the Indentures to
postpone the interest payments due on the New Senior Notes and Old Senior Notes
for thirty days. This resulted in an event of default under the Senior Credit
Facilities and the Pre-Petition Receivables Facility. An additional default
occurred under the Senior Credit Facilities when ACL initiated proceedings under
Chapter 11 as of January 31, 2003. Accordingly, ACL has classified all of its
long-term debt as current debt as of December 27, 2002. The effects of these
events of default are stayed pursuant to certain provisions of the Bankruptcy
Code.

At December 26, 2003, the principal payments of long-term debt based on the
contractual terms of the instruments prior to the Chapter 11 filings were as
follows:

2004 $ 35,891
2005 87,991
2006 89,322
2007 111,103
2008 269,383
Thereafter 21,273
---------
614,963
Unamortized debt discount (51,518)
---------
$ 563,445
=========

Upon adoption of SFAS No. 145 in 2003 which rescinded SFAS No. 4, "Reporting
Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt", ACL reclassified an extraordinary
gain of $1,885 recorded in 2001 (relating to the retirement of senior notes) to
other income in the consolidated statement of operations for 2001.

-126-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION AS OF JANUARY 31, 2003)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)

NOTE 7. INCOME TAXES

ACL and its subsidiaries (except for ACL Capital Corp., American Commercial
Lines Funding Corporation and the foreign subsidiaries) are organized as limited
liability companies. As such, ACL passes through its U.S. federal and
substantially all of its state (but not foreign) taxable income to its members
who are responsible for income taxes on such taxable income.

Components of income tax expense (benefit) follow:

May 29, 2002 to December 29, 2001
2003 December 27, 2002 to May 28, 2002 2001
---- ----------------- --------------- ----

State $ 37 $ (12) $ 1 $ 24
Foreign 2,069 750 (920) 94
Federal (5) 5 -- --
------- ----- ----- ----
$ 2,101 $ 743 $(919) $118
======= ===== ===== ====

-127-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION AS OF JANUARY 31, 2003)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)

NOTE 8. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

ACL sponsors or participates in defined benefit plans covering both salaried and
hourly employees. The plans provide for eligible employees to receive benefits
based on years of service and either compensation rates near retirement or at a
predetermined multiplier factor. Contributions to the plans are sufficient to
meet the minimum funding standards set forth in the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), as amended. Plan assets consist primarily of
common stocks, corporate bonds and cash and cash equivalents.

In addition to the defined benefit pension and related plans, ACL has a defined
benefit post-retirement healthcare plan covering most full-time employees. The
plan provides medical benefits and is contributory, with retiree contributions
adjusted annually, and contains other cost-sharing features such as deductibles
and coinsurance. The accounting for the healthcare plan anticipates future
cost-sharing changes to the written plan that are consistent with ACL's
expressed intent to increase the retiree contribution rate annually.

In 2003, ACL modified the post-retirement healthcare plan by discontinuing
coverage to new hires and current employees who had not reached age 50 by July
1, 2003 and by terminating the prescription drug benefit for all retirees as of
January 1, 2004.

ACL also sponsors a contributory defined contribution plan ("401k") covering
eligible employee groups. ACL's non-qualified savings plan, for certain members
of management, was suspended in 2003 as a result of the Chapter 11 filing.
Contributions to such plans are based upon a percentage of employee
contributions and were $391, $1,887 and $1,471 in 2003, 2002 and 2001,
respectively. In 2003, ACL suspended the employer matching of employee
contributions in the 401k plan.

Certain employees are covered by a union-sponsored, collectively-bargained,
multi-employer defined benefit pension plan. Contributions to the plan, which
are based upon a union contract, were approximately $23, $7 and $74 in 2003,
2002 and 2001, respectively.

-128-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION AS OF JANUARY 31, 2003)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)

A summary of the pension and post-retirement plan components follows:

Pension
----------------------------------------------------------------
December 26, 2003 December 27, 2002 May 28, 2002
----------------- ----------------- ------------

CHANGE IN BENEFIT OBLIGATION:
Benefit obligation, beginning of period $(110,713) $ (97,901) $ (92,936)
Service cost (4,347) (2,451) (1,605)
Interest cost (7,379) (4,095) (2,816)
Impact of plan changes (47) (1,983) --
Liability loss (10,811) (7,381) (3,474)
Benefits paid 4,972 3,098 2,930
--------- --------- ---------
Benefit obligation, end of period $(128,325) $(110,713) $ (97,901)
========= ========= =========
CHANGE IN PLAN ASSETS:
Fair value of plan assets, beginning of period $ 104,764 $ 117,992 $ 112,964
Actual return on plan assets 17,114 (10,139) 7,942
Employer contributions 13 9 16
Benefits paid (4,972) (3,098) (2,930)
--------- --------- ---------
Fair value of plan assets, end of period $ 116,919 $ 104,764 $ 117,992
========= ========= =========
FUNDED STATUS:
Funded status $ (11,406) $ (5,949) $ 20,091
Unrecognized net actuarial loss 28,022 23,876 --
Unrecognized prior service cost 1,664 1,880 --
Net claims during 4th quarter -- 4 3
--------- --------- ---------
Prepaid benefit cost $ 18,280 $ 19,811 $ 20,094
========= ========= =========
AMOUNTS RECOGNIZED IN THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION CONSIST OF:
Prepaid benefit cost $ 21,824 $ 20,806 $ 22,702
Accrued benefit liability (22,979) (16,480) (2,608)
Minimum pension liability 19,435 15,485 --
--------- --------- ---------
Net amount recognized $ 18,280 $ 19,811 $ 20,094
========= ========= =========

The accumulated benefit obligation for ACL's pension plans amounts to $126,391
as of December 26, 2003.

-129-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION AS OF JANUARY 31, 2003)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)

Post-Retirement
---------------------------------------------------------------
December 26, 2003 December 27, 2002 May 28, 2002
----------------- ----------------- ------------

CHANGE IN BENEFIT OBLIGATION:
Benefit obligation, beginning of period $(15,304) $(12,614) $(12,412)
Service cost (483) (279) (195)
Interest cost (992) (524) (372)
Plan participants' contributions (623) (225) (154)
Plan amendment 4,139 -- --
Actuarial loss (1,516) (3,069) (185)
Benefits paid 1,902 1,407 704
-------- -------- --------
Benefit obligation, end of period $(12,877) $(15,304) $(12,614)
======== ======== ========
CHANGE IN PLAN ASSETS:
Fair value of plan assets, beginning of period $ -- $ -- $ --
Employer contributions 1,279 1,182 550
Plan participants' contributions 623 225 154
Benefits paid (1,902) (1,407) (704)
-------- -------- --------
Fair value of plan assets, end of period $ -- $ -- $ --
======== ======== ========
FUNDED STATUS:
Funded status $(12,877) $(15,304) $(12,614)
Unrecognized net actuarial loss 4,474 2,991 --
Unrecognized prior service cost (4,139) -- --
Net claims during 4th quarter 542 366 427
-------- -------- --------
Accrued benefit cost $(12,000) $(11,947) $(12,187)
======== ======== ========

-130-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION AS OF JANUARY 31, 2003)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)

COMPONENTS OF NET PERIODIC BENEFIT COST:

May 29, 2002 to December 29, 2001
2003 December 27, 2002 to May 28, 2002 2001
---- ----------------- --------------- ----

Pension:
Service cost $ 4,348 $ 2,451 $ 1,605 $ 3,818
Interest cost 7,379 4,095 2,816 6,408
Expected return on plan assets (10,461) (6,347) (4,848) (11,937)
Amortization of prior service costs 216 103 (854) (2,015)
Loss (gain) amortization 11 -- (13) (172)
-------- ------- ------- --------
Net periodic benefit cost (income) $ 1,493 $ 302 $(1,294) $ (3,898)
======== ======= ======= ========
Post-retirement:
Service cost $ 483 $ 279 $ 195 $ 399
Interest cost 992 524 372 826
Amortization of prior service costs -- -- (120) (288)
Loss (gain) amortization 152 -- (87) (348)
-------- ------- ------- --------
Net periodic benefit cost $ 1,627 $ 803 $ 360 $ 589
======== ======= ======= ========

ACL uses a September 30 measurement date in determining pension and other
post-retirement benefit measurements for its plans.

WEIGHTED-AVERAGE ASSUMPTIONS:

Pension:
Discount rate 6.25% 6.75% 7.25% 7.50%
Expected return on plan assets 8.50% 9.00% 9.50% 10.00%
Rate of compensation increase 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00%

ACL employs a historical market and peer review approach in determining the
long-term rate of return for plan assets. Historical markets are studied and
long-term historical relationships between equities and fixed income are
preserved consistent with the widely-accepted capital market principle that
assets with higher volatility generate a greater return over the long run.
Current market factors such as inflation and interest rates are evaluated before
long-term capital market assumptions are determined. The long-term portfolio
return is established via a building block approach with proper consideration of
diversification and rebalancing. Peer data and historical returns are reviewed
to check for reasonability and appropriateness.

Post-retirement:
Discount rate 6.75% 7.25% 7.50% 7.75%

The net post-retirement benefit obligation was determined using the assumption
that the health care cost trend rate for retirees was 9.0% for the current year,
decreasing gradually to a 5.0% trend rate by 2010 and remaining at that level
thereafter. A 1% increase in the assumed health care cost trend rate would have
increased the accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation as of December 26,
2003 by $135 and the aggregate of the service and interest cost components of
net periodic post-retirement benefit expense for 2003 by $29.

-131-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION AS OF JANUARY 31, 2003)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)

PENSION PLAN ASSETS

The following table presents the fair value percentage of plan assets in each
asset category .

December 26, 2003 December 27, 2002
----------------- -----------------

Asset Category
Equity securities 66.0% 50.7%
Debt securities 33.7 44.8
Cash 0.3 4.5
----- -----
Total 100.0% 100.0%
===== =====

INVESTMENT POLICIES AND STRATEGIES

ACL employs a total return investment approach whereby a mix of equities and
fixed income investments are used to maximize the long-term return of plan
assets for a prudent level of risk. The intent of this strategy is to minimize
plan expenses by outperforming plan liabilities over the long run. Risk
tolerance is established through careful consideration of plan liabilities, plan
funded status, and corporate financial condition. The investment portfolio
contains a diversified blend of equity and fixed income investments.
Furthermore, equity investments are diversified across U.S. and non-U.S. stocks
as well as growth, value and small, mid and large capitalizations. Target
allocations are maintained through monthly rebalancing procedures. Derivatives
may be used to gain market exposure in an efficient and timely manner; however,
derivatives may not be used to leverage the portfolio beyond the market value of
the underlying investments. Investment risk is measured and monitored on an
ongoing basis through annual liability measurements, periodic asset/liability
studies, and quarterly investment portfolio reviews.

PLANS WITH BENEFIT OBLIGATIONS IN EXCESS OF PLAN ASSETS

The following plans have projected benefit obligations and accumulated benefit
obligations in excess of the plan assets.

ACL Pension Evansville Pension Special Plan
----------- ------------------ ------------

Projected Benefit Obligation $(98,817) $(146) $(1,180)
Accumulated Benefit Obligation (96,903) (146) (1,168)
Plan Assets 75,420 113 --

CONTRIBUTIONS

The post-retirement benefit plan is unfunded. ACL expects to pay $700 in medical
benefits under the plan in 2004, net of retiree contributions. The pension plans
are funded and held in trust. ACL expects to contribute $31 to the pension plans
in 2004.

-132-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION AS OF JANUARY 31, 2003)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)

NOTE 9. LEASE OBLIGATIONS

ACL leases buildings, data processing hardware and operating equipment under
various operating leases and charter agreements, which expire from 2003 to 2017
and which generally have renewal options at similar terms. Certain vessel leases
also contain purchase options at prices approximating fair value of the leased
vessels. Rental expense under continuing obligations was $37,044 for fiscal year
2003; $23,121 for the period December 29, 2001 through May 28, 2002; $29,896 for
the period May 29, 2002 through December 27, 2002; and $56,711 for fiscal year
2001.

At December 26, 2003, obligations under ACL's operating leases with initial or
remaining noncancelable lease terms longer than one year and capital leases were
as follows:

2009
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 and after

Operating Lease Obligations:
Operating Leases $20,382 $18,424 $17,425 $14,030 $13,413 $52,354
Operating Leases - Related Parties 840 839 27 -- -- --
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
$21,222 $19,263 $17,452 $14,030 $13,413 $52,354
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
Future Capital Lease Obligations $ 460 $ 460 $ 460 $ 192 $ -- $ --
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======

The total future minimum lease payments under capital leases of $1,572 less an
interest amount of $245 results in a present value of net minimum lease payments
of $1,327 which is recorded in other liabilities subject to compromise.

ACL entered into capital leases of $3,924 in 2001 with Vessel Leasing, a
related party. Due to a change in the lease terms in 2002, the lease became an
operating lease. ACL incurred interest expense related to capital leases of $150
for fiscal year 2003; $220 for the period December 29, 2001 through May 28,
2002; $101 for the period May 29, 2002 through December 27, 2002; and $235 for
fiscal year 2001.

NOTE 10. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On July 24, 2002, the Board of Directors of DHC amended DHC's 1995 Stock and
Incentive Plan and granted stock options to management of ACL for 1,560,000
shares of DHC common stock. The options have an exercise price of $5.00 per
share and expire 10 years from the date of grant. One half of the options time
vest over a 4 year period in equal annual installments and one half of the
options vest over a 4 year period in equal annual installments contingent upon
the financial performance of ACL. During 2003, options for 765,000 shares of
common stock were forfeited due to terminations and ACL not achieving the
financial performance targets. Options for 795,000 shares are outstanding as of
December 26, 2003 of which 146,250 shares are vested. Of the outstanding
options, options for 470,265 shares time vest and options for 324,375 shares
vest contingent upon ACL's future financial performance. ACL accounts for stock
options under the intrinsic value method based on APB 25, "Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees". Because the market price of DHC common stock was not
greater than the exercise price of the options at the date of grant and the
financial performance targets have not been met, no compensation expense has
been recognized in the accompanying financial statements related to the stock
options.

On May 29, 2002, DHC issued 339,040 shares of restricted DHC common stock to ACL
management. These restricted shares have been valued at fair value at the date
of issuance and vest one third annually over a three year period. The full value
of these shares is recorded as other capital with an offset to unearned
compensation in member's equity. As employees render service over the vesting
period, compensation expense is recorded and unearned compensation is reduced.
In 2003 and 2002, 102,333 shares and 53,173 shares, respectively, of restricted
DHC common stock were cancelled.

ACL recorded terminal service expense with GMS of $1,313 for fiscal year 2003;
$330 for the period December 29, 2001 through May 28, 2002; $579 for the period
May 29, 2002 through December 27, 2002; and $400 for fiscal year 2001. In 2001,
ACL received $11,969 from GMS for the sale of terminals and proceeds from the
condemnation of a terminal. ACL recognized a gain of $1,886 from these
transactions.

-133-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION AS OF JANUARY 31, 2003)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)

ACL recorded charter income from UABL of $10,125 for fiscal year 2003; $4,493
for the period December 29, 2001 through May 28, 2002; $5,936 for the period May
29, 2002 through December 27, 2002; and $11,052 for fiscal year 2001. ACL also
recorded administrative fee expenses to UABL of $7,344 for fiscal year 2003;
$3,158 for the period December 29, 2001 through May 28, 2002; $4,306 for the
period May 29, 2002 to December 27, 2002; and $7,709 for fiscal year 2001. These
expenses are included in material, supplies and other in the consolidated
statement of operations. ACL sold used barges to UABL for $480 in 2003 and $790
in 2001. At December 26, 2003, ACL had receivables of $1,755 and payables of $25
with UABL. At December 27, 2002, ACL had receivables of $6,341 from UABL.

ACL earned $1,527 in 2002 for bauxite unloading revenue from GMSV. ACL had
$4,519 and $3,787 in receivables from GSMV for revenue transactions and
equipment advances at December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002, respectively.

In 2001, ACL and Vectura Group invested in Vessel Leasing. ACL accounted for its
50% ownership in Vessel Leasing by the equity method until May 29, 2002 at which
time ACL began consolidating Vessel Leasing as a result of the Danielson
acquisition of ACL. ACL's share of Vessel Leasing's net loss is $38 for fiscal
2001 and is included in other income in the consolidated statement of
operations.

ACL sold new barges for $47,757 to Vessel Leasing in 2001. Profit on sales of
barges to Vessel Leasing was deferred by Jeffboat and was being recognized over
the life of the lease. Deferred profit was eliminated with purchase accounting
adjustments as a result of the Danielson recapitalization. All of these barges,
except for the capital leases of $3,924, were leased by Vessel Leasing to ACL as
operating leases which resulted in ACL charter expense of $1,760 for the period
December 29, 2001 through May 28, 2002 and $1,705 for fiscal year 2001.

-134-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION AS OF JANUARY 31, 2003)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)

NOTE 11. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND RISK MANAGEMENT

The carrying amounts (net of debt discount) and fair values of ACL's financial
instruments are as follows:

2003 2002
--------------------- -------------------
CARRYING FAIR CARRYING FAIR
AMOUNT VALUE AMOUNT VALUE
-------- -------- ------ ------

Assets:
Fuel rate cap $ 1,437 $ 1,437 $ -- $ --
Net unrealized gain on fuel hedge agreements -- -- 194 194

Liabilities:
Debtor in Possession Term Loan B 50,000 50,000 -- --
Revolving Credit Facility 46,146 38,993 41,000 41,000
Tranche A Term Loan 43,119 36,436 43,119 43,119
Tranche B Term Loan 124,141 104,899 124,141 124,141
Tranche C Term Loan 146,069 123,428 146,069 146,069
New Senior Notes 129,793 10,383 128,491 38,376
Senior Subordinated Notes (PIK Notes) 80,194 -- 68,797 3,483
Old Senior Notes 5,133 -- 4,946 1,820
Bonds guaranteed by the Maritime Administration 34,996 34,996 37,740 37,740
Other Notes -- -- 317 315

The fair values of the fuel rate cap and the fuel hedge agreements, the Term
Loans, New Senior Notes, PIK Notes and Old Senior Notes payable are based on
quoted market values. The carrying value of the DIP Credit Facility, which bears
interest at a floating rate, approximates its fair value. The bonds guaranteed
by the Maritime Administration were recently issued and, accordingly, the
carrying values approximate fair values. The Other Notes have been estimated
using discounted cash flow analyses based on ACL's current incremental borrowing
rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

FUEL PRICE RISK MANAGEMENT

ACL uses fuel rate caps and forward fuel purchases to provide partial short-term
protection against a sharp increase in diesel fuel prices. These instruments
generally cover a portion of ACL's forecasted diesel fuel needs for towboat
operations. ACL accounts for these instruments as cash flow hedges. In
accordance with SFAS No. 133, such financial instruments are marked-to-market
and, if they qualify for hedge accounting, the offset is recorded to other
comprehensive income and then subsequently recognized as a component of fuel
expense when the underlying fuel being hedged is used. Should these instruments
not qualify for hedge accounting (correlation ratio is outside of defined
deviation), such changes in value would be recorded through the statement of
operations rather than other comprehensive income. ACL also has barging customer
contract rate provisions for changes in fuel prices for approximately half of
gallons consumed. The adjustments are deferred one calendar quarter.

At December 27, 2002, ACL had forward fuel purchase contracts outstanding with
an aggregate notional value of $4,428 and a fair value of $194 which has been
recorded in other current assets on the consolidated statement of financial
position. At December 26, 2003, ACL had forward fuel rate cap contracts
outstanding with an aggregate historical cost of $917 and a fair value of
approximately $1,437, which has been recorded in other current assets on the
consolidated statement of financial position. Under the rate cap agreements, ACL
will receive reimbursement from the seller if the average index price defined in
the agreements exceeds $0.81 - $0.86 per gallon. There were 9.6 million gallons
protected under the caps on the contracts at December 26, 2003.

-135-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION AS OF JANUARY 31, 2003)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)

INTEREST RATE RISK MANAGEMENT

ACL entered into an interest rate cap agreement in the third quarter of 2000 to
reduce the impact of potential rate increases on floating rate debt. The
interest rate cap had a notional amount of $201,800 and a fair value of zero as
of December 27, 2002 and was effective through August 11, 2003.

ACL recognizes changes in the fair value of interest rate swap agreements
entered into by GMS. Such changes are recorded in other assets or liabilities on
the accompanying consolidated statement of financial position, with the offset
recorded as comprehensive income (loss) or other income (expense) depending on
whether the swap is an effective or ineffective hedge. ACL's share of the change
in fair value of the swap agreements amounted to $440 in 2003 and ($290) in
2002, after the acquisition of ACL by DHC.

NOTE 12. CONTINGENCIES

A number of legal actions are pending against ACL in which claims are made in
substantial amounts. While the ultimate results of pending litigation cannot be
predicted with certainty, management does not currently expect that resolution
of these matters will have a material adverse effect on ACL's consolidated
results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

NOTE 13. BUSINESS SEGMENTS

ACL has two reportable business segments - barging and construction. ACL's
barging segment includes barge transportation operations in North and South
America and domestic fleeting facilities that provide fleeting, shifting,
cleaning and repair services at various locations along the inland waterways.
The construction segment constructs marine equipment for ACL's domestic and
international fleets, as well as external customers.

Management evaluates performance based on segment earnings, which is defined as
operating income. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are
consistent with those described in the summary of significant accounting
policies. Intercompany sales are transferred at cost.

-136-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION AS OF JANUARY 31, 2003)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)

Reportable segments are business units that offer different products or
services. The reportable segments are managed separately because they provide
distinct products and services to internal and external customers.

REPORTABLE SEGMENTS
--------------------------- ALL OTHER
BARGING CONSTRUCTION SEGMENTS(1) TOTAL
--------- ------------ ----------- ---------

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 26, 2003
Revenues from external customers $ 542,764 $ 70,208 $ 7,099 $ 620,071
Intersegment revenues - 1,544 - 1,544
Depreciation and amortization expense 50,592 2,917 1,409 54,918
Segment income (loss) 1,676 (832) (477) 367
Segment assets 719,876 64,035 28,285 812,196
Property additions 8,541 598 70 9,209

MAY 29, 2002 TO DECEMBER 27, 2002
Revenues from external customers $ 377,498 $ 43,994 $ 6,555 $ 428,047
Intersegment revenues - 720 - 720
Depreciation and amortization expense 35,337 1,411 659 37,407
Segment earnings (loss) 14,896 (1,866) 963 13,993
Segment assets 728,856 55,236 27,549 811,641
Property additions 6,572 880 305 7,757

DECEMBER 29, 2001 TO MAY 28, 2002
Revenues from external customers $ 243,202 $ 37,659 $ 3,944 $ 284,805
Intersegment revenues - 560 20 580
Depreciation and amortization expense 20,373 989 462 21,824
Segment (loss) earnings (21,182) 1,287 1,505 (18,390)
Property additions 5,067 481 57 5,605

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 28, 2001
Revenues from external customers $ 672,590 $ 102,862 $13,049 $ 788,501
Intersegment revenues - 1,563 4 1,567
Depreciation and amortization expense 51,890 2,203 1,404 55,497
Segment earnings 58,436 4,713 2,212 65,361
Segment assets 672,057 59,676 26,203 757,936
Property additions (excluding $5,811 in
capital leases, and related expenditures) 16,879 2,094 799 19,772

(1) Financial data for segments below the reporting thresholds is attributable
to a segment operating terminals along the U.S. inland waterways and in
Venezuela.

-137-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION AS OF JANUARY 31, 2003)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)

The following is a reconciliation of ACL's revenues from external customers and
segment earnings to ACL's consolidated totals.

MAY 29, 2002 TO DECEMBER 29, 2001
2003 DECEMBER 27, 2002 TO MAY 28, 2002 2001
--------- ----------------- --------------- ---------

REVENUES
Revenues from external customers $ 620,071 $ 428,047 $ 284,805 $ 788,501
Intersegment revenues 1,544 720 580 1,567
Elimination of intersegment revenues (1,544) (720) (580) (1,567)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Operating revenue $ 620,071 $ 428,047 $ 284,805 $ 788,501
========= ========= ========= =========
EARNINGS
Total segment earnings (loss) $ 367 $ 13,993 $ (18,390) $ 65,361
Unallocated amounts:
Interest expense (41,514) (35,944) (25,712) (70,932)
Other, net 6,016 (3,307) (827) 359
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Loss before reorganization items, income taxes
and cumulative effect of accounting change $ (35,131) $ (25,258) $ (44,929) $ (5,212)
========= ========= ========= =========

-138-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION AS OF JANUARY 31, 2003)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

REVENUES
-------------------------------------------------------------------
MAY 29, 2002 TO DECEMBER 29, 2001
2003 DECEMBER 27, 2002 TO MAY 28, 2002 2001
-------- ----------------- --------------- --------

United States $583,961 $397,603 $272,548 $748,837
South America 36,110 30,444 12,257 39,664
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total $620,071 $428,047 $284,805 $788,501
======== ======== ======== ========

PROPERTIES - NET
----------------------------------------
DECEMBER 26, 2003 DECEMBER 27, 2002
----------------- -----------------

United States $512,404 $548,327
South America 27,740 37,458
-------- --------
Total $540,144 $585,785
======== ========

Revenues are attributed to countries based on the location of the service
provided. Properties represent the only significant long-lived assets of ACL.

MAJOR CUSTOMER

Revenues from one customer of the barging segment represented approximately 15%
for fiscal year 2003; 14% for the period December 29, 2001 through May 28, 2002;
16% for the period May 29, 2002 through December 27, 2002; and 15% for fiscal
year 2001 of ACL's consolidated revenues.

-139-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION AS OF JANUARY 31, 2003)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)

NOTE 14. ASSET DISPOSITIONS

In 2001, ACL sold five towboats, a shipyard in Harahan, Louisiana, a cleaning
facility in Baton Rouge, Louisiana and other assets. This resulted in a gain of
$16,762 which is included in the net gain on property dispositions in the
consolidated statement of operations.

On May 25, 2001, ACL entered into an agreement to sell substantially all of the
terminals of ACT, other than its coal transfer facility at St. Louis, Missouri
and its tank storage facility at Memphis, Tennessee. The sale of seven terminals
was completed on May 25, 2001. An additional terminal site in Omaha, Nebraska
was transferred on June 29, 2001. Subsequent to June 29, 2001, additional
proceeds were received from the condemnation of Omaha Terminal. ACL recorded a
gain from these transactions of $1,886 in other income in the consolidated
statement of operations.

-140-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION AS OF JANUARY 31, 2003)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)

NOTE 15. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of December 26, 2003 and
December 27, 2002 consists of the following:

2003 2002
-------- --------

Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedging instruments:
Fuel swaps $ 520 $ 68
Interest rate swaps 150 (290)
Foreign currency translation 912 408
Minimum pension liability (19,436) (15,485)
-------- --------
$(17,854) $(15,299)
======== ========

Other comprehensive income (loss) related to ACL's investment in GMS was $973
for fiscal year 2003, $192 for the period December 29, 2001 through May 28,
2002; $89 for the period May 29, 2002 through December 27, 2002; and ($1,131)
for the fiscal year 2001, related to interest rate swaps and foreign currency
translation.

NOTE 16. DEBTOR GUARANTOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The DIP Credit Facility and the Senior Credit Facilities are guaranteed by ACL
and the other debtor subsidiaries (collectively the "Guarantors"). Such
guarantees are full, unconditional and joint and several. The ACL guarantor
companies filed collectively on January 31, 2003 to reorganize under Chapter 11
of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (see Note 1) and continue to operate as Debtor
Guarantors. The following supplemental financial information sets forth on a
combined basis, combining statements of financial position, statements of
operations and statements of cash flows for the Debtor Guarantors and
non-guarantor subsidiaries as of December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002 and the
fiscal year ended December 26, 2003, periods May 29, 2002 through December 27,
2002 and December 29, 2001 through May 28, 2002, and for the fiscal year ended
December 28, 2001.

-141-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION AS OF JANUARY 31, 2003)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
COMBINING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 26, 2003

DEBTOR NON- COMBINED
GUARANTORS GUARANTORS ELIMINATIONS TOTALS
---------- ---------- ------------ ---------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

OPERATING REVENUE
Revenue $ 579,071 $ 30,592 $ -- $ 609,663
Revenue from related parties 647 10,125 (364) 10,408
--------- -------- --------- ---------
579,718 40,717 (364) 620,071
OPERATING EXPENSE
Materials, Supplies and Other 254,050 19,753 -- 273,803
Rent 35,970 1,438 (364) 37,044
Labor and Fringe Benefits 142,368 6,106 -- 148,474
Fuel 82,829 598 -- 83,427
Depreciation and Amortization 48,122 6,796 -- 54,918
Gain on Property Dispositions, Net (274) (13) -- (287)
Taxes, Other Than Income Taxes 22,215 110 -- 22,325
--------- -------- --------- ---------
585,280 34,788 (364) 619,704
--------- -------- --------- ---------
OPERATING (LOSS) INCOME (5,562) 5,929 -- 367

OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME)
Interest Expense 38,781 2,733 -- 41,514
Interest Expense, Affiliate - Net -- 7,411 (7,411) --
Other, Net (7,382) (4,675) 6,041 (6,016)
--------- -------- --------- ---------
31,399 5,469 (1,370) 35,498
--------- -------- --------- ---------
LOSS BEFORE REORGANIZATION ITEMS AND
INCOME TAXES (36,961) 460 1,370 (35,131)

REORGANIZATION ITEMS 24,344 -- -- 24,344
--------- -------- --------- ---------
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES (61,305) 460 1,370 (59,475)

INCOME TAXES 271 1,830 -- 2,101
--------- -------- --------- ---------
NET LOSS $ (61,576) $ (1,370) $ 1,370 $ (61,576)
========= ======== ========= =========

-142-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
COMBINING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE PERIOD
MAY 29, 2002 THROUGH DECEMBER 27, 2002

NON- COMBINED
GUARANTORS GUARANTORS ELIMINATIONS TOTALS
--------- ---------- ------------ --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

OPERATING REVENUE
Revenue $ 395,108 $24,905 $ -- $420,013
Revenue from related parties 883 7,368 (217) 8,034
--------- ------- -------- --------
395,991 32,273 (217) 428,047
OPERATING EXPENSE
Materials, Supplies and Other 171,647 12,685 -- 184,332
Restructuring Cost 565 -- -- 565
Rent 29,297 816 (217) 29,896
Labor and Fringe Benefits 94,055 2,966 -- 97,021
Fuel 48,888 460 -- 49,348
Depreciation and Amortization 33,766 3,641 -- 37,407
Taxes, Other Than Income Taxes 15,408 77 -- 15,485
--------- ------- -------- --------
393,626 20,645 (217) 414,054
--------- ------- -------- --------
OPERATING INCOME 2,365 11,628 -- 13,993

OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME)
Interest Expense 34,776 1,168 -- 35,944
Interest Expense, Affiliate - Net -- 4,261 (4,261) --
Other, Net (6,845) 4,089 6,063 3,307
--------- ------- -------- --------
27,931 9,518 1,802 39,251
--------- ------- -------- --------
(LOSS) INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES (25,566) 2,110 (1,802) (25,258)

INCOME TAXES 435 308 -- 743
--------- ------- -------- --------
NET (LOSS) EARNINGS $ (26,001) $ 1,802 $ (1,802) $(26,001)
========= ======= ======== ========

-143-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
COMBINING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE PERIOD
DECEMBER 29, 2001 THROUGH MAY 28, 2002

NON- COMBINED
GUARANTORS GUARANTORS ELIMINATIONS TOTALS
---------- ---------- ------------ ------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

OPERATING REVENUE
Revenue $ 272,653 $ 7,154 $ -- $ 279,807
Revenue from related parties 547 4,588 (137) 4,998
--------- --------- --------- ---------
273,200 11,742 (137) 284,805

OPERATING EXPENSE
Materials, Supplies and Other 128,363 9,729 -- 138,092
Restructuring Cost 13,493 -- -- 13,493
Rent 22,664 594 (137) 23,121
Labor and Fringe Benefits 64,172 1,588 -- 65,760
Fuel 30,316 118 -- 30,434
Depreciation and Amortization 19,413 2,411 -- 21,824
Gain on Property Dispositions, Net (452) (3) -- (455)
Taxes, Other Than Income Taxes 10,902 24 -- 10,926
--------- --------- --------- ---------
288,871 14,461 (137) 303,195
--------- --------- --------- ---------

OPERATING LOSS (15,671) (2,719) -- (18,390)

OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME)
Interest Expense 25,691 21 -- 25,712
Interest Expense, Affiliate - Net 827 2,801 (2,801) 827
Other, Net 2,797 (502) (2,295) --
--------- --------- --------- ---------
29,315 2,320 (5,096) 26,539
--------- --------- --------- ---------

LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES (44,986) (5,039) 5,096 (44,929)

INCOME TAXES (BENEFIT) (976) 57 -- (919)
--------- --------- --------- ---------

NET LOSS $ (44,010) $ (5,096) $ 5,096 $ (44,010)
========= ========= ========= =========

-144-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
COMBINING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 28, 2001

NON- COMBINED
GUARANTORS GUARANTORS ELIMINATIONS TOTALS
---------- ---------- ------------ ------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

OPERATING REVENUE
Revenue $ 701,081 $ 28,611 $ -- $ 729,692
Revenue from related parties 47,757 11,052 -- 58,809
--------- --------- --------- ---------
748,838 39,663 -- 788,501

OPERATING EXPENSE
Materials, Supplies and Other 319,093 22,513 -- 341,606
Rent 55,191 1,520 -- 56,711
Labor and Fringe Benefits 161,606 4,435 -- 166,041
Fuel 92,991 569 -- 93,560
Depreciation and Amortization 50,364 5,133 -- 55,497
Gain on Property Dispositions, Net (16,498) -- -- (16,498)
Taxes, Other Than Income Taxes 26,166 57 -- 26,223
--------- --------- --------- ---------
688,913 34,227 -- 723,140
--------- --------- --------- ---------

OPERATING INCOME 59,925 5,436 -- 65,361

OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME)
Interest Expense 70,932 -- -- 70,932
Interest Expense, Affiliate - Net -- 6,364 (6,364) --
Other, Net (5,656) 3,490 1,807 (359)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
65,276 9,854 (4,557) 70,573
--------- --------- --------- ---------
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND CUMULATIVE
EFFECT OF ACCOUNTING CHANGE (5,351) (4,418) 4,557 (5,212)

INCOME TAXES (BENEFIT) (21) 139 -- 118
--------- --------- --------- ---------

LOSS BEFORE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF
ACCOUNTING CHANGE (5,330) (4,557) 4,557 (5,330)

CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF ACCOUNTING CHANGE (490) -- -- (490)
--------- --------- --------- ---------

NET LOSS $ (5,820) $ (4,557) $ 4,557 $ (5,820)
========= ========= ========= =========

-145-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION AS OF JANUARY 31, 2003)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
COMBINING STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AT DECEMBER 26, 2003

DEBTOR NON- COMBINED
GUARANTORS GUARANTORS ELIMINATIONS TOTALS
---------- ---------- ------------ ------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and Cash Equivalents $ 31,673 $ 3,602 $ -- $ 35,275
Cash, Restricted -- 7,754 -- 7,754
Accounts Receivable - Net 63,672 10,532 -- 74,204
Accounts Receivable - Related Parties 4,027 2,329 -- 6,356
Materials and Supplies 31,671 1,419 -- 33,090
Other Current Assets 21,631 (6,092) -- 15,539
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total Current Assets 152,674 19,544 -- 172,218

PROPERTIES - NET 468,871 71,273 -- 540,144
NET PENSION ASSET 21,824 -- -- 21,824
INVESTMENTS IN & ADVANCES TO EQUITY INVESTEES 100,244 42,730 (85,112) 57,862
OTHER ASSETS 19,114 1,034 -- 20,148
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total Assets $ 762,727 $ 134,581 $ (85,112) $ 812,196
========= ========= ========= =========

LIABILITIES

LIABILITIES NOT SUBJECT TO COMPROMISE
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable $ 20,787 $ 1,046 $ -- $ 21,833
Accrued Payroll and Fringe Benefits 14,075 -- -- 14,075
Deferred Revenue 4,135 4,045 -- 8,180
Accrued Claims and Insurance Premiums 4,924 -- -- 4,924
Accrued Interest 5,050 134 -- 5,184
Current Portion of Long-Term Debt 50,000 34,996 -- 84,996
Other Liabilities 23,822 1,634 -- 25,456
Other Liabilities - Related Parties (1) 25 -- 24
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total Current Liabilities 122,792 41,880 -- 164,672

Long-Term Note Payable to Affiliate -- 98,411 (98,411) --
Pension Liability 21,516 -- -- 21,516
Other Liabilities 10,573 7,589 -- 18,162
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total Liabilities Not Subject to Compromise 154,881 147,880 (98,411) 204,350

LIABILITIES SUBJECT TO COMPROMISE
Accounts Payable 34,759 -- -- 34,759
Accrued Claims and Insurance Premiums 4,506 -- -- 4,506
Accrued Interest 10,762 -- -- 10,762
Short-Term Debt 46,146 -- -- 46,146
Current Portion of Long-Term Debt 528,449 -- -- 528,449
Other Liabilities 2,898 -- -- 2,898
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total Liabilities Subject to Compromise 627,520 -- -- 627,520
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total Liabilities 782,401 147,880 (98,411) 831,870
--------- --------- --------- ---------

MEMBER'S DEFICIT

Member's Interest 85,025 10,511 (10,511) 85,025
Other Capital 1,021 50,874 (50,874) 1,021
Unearned Compensation (289) -- -- (289)
Retained Deficit (87,577) (74,684) 74,684 (87,577)
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (17,854) -- -- (17,854)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total Member's Deficit (19,674) (13,299) 13,299 (19,674)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total Liabilities and Member's Deficit $ 762,727 $ 134,581 $ (85,112) $ 812,196
========= ========= ========= =========

-146-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
COMBINING STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AT DECEMBER 27, 2002

NON- COMBINED
GUARANTORS GUARANTORS ELIMINATIONS TOTALS
---------- ---------- ------------ ------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and Cash Equivalents $ 11,518 $ 2,978 $ -- $ 14,496
Cash, Restricted -- 6,328 -- 6,328
Accounts Receivable - Net 24,277 37,759 (21,152) 40,884
Accounts Receivable - Related Parties 4,129 7,365 -- 11,494
Materials and Supplies 33,370 1,014 -- 34,384
Other Current Assets 38,656 (12,847) -- 25,809
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total Current Assets 111,950 42,597 (21,152) 133,395

PROPERTIES - NET 512,614 73,171 -- 585,785
NET PENSION ASSET 20,806 -- -- 20,806
INVESTMENTS IN & ADVANCES TO EQUITY INVESTEES 100,285 42,933 (87,541) 55,677
OTHER ASSETS 14,921 1,057 -- 15,978
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total Assets $ 760,576 $ 159,758 $(108,693) $ 811,641
========= ========= ========= =========

LIABILITIES

CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable $ 31,804 $ 1,497 $ -- $ 33,301
Accrued Payroll and Fringe Benefits 15,713 -- -- 15,713
Deferred Revenue 7,407 2,957 -- 10,364
Accrued Claims and Insurance Premiums 26,547 -- -- 26,547
Accrued Interest 16,283 146 -- 16,429
Short-term Debt 41,000 -- -- 41,000
Current Portion of Long-Term Debt 515,879 37,741 -- 553,620
Other Current Liabilities 33,181 2,242 -- 35,423
Other Current Liabilities - Related Parties 168 21,152 (21,152) 168
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total Current Liabilities 687,982 65,735 (21,152) 732,565

LONG-TERM NOTE PAYABLE TO AFFILIATE -- 92,569 (92,569) --
PENSION LIABILITY 15,072 -- -- 15,072
OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES 13,500 6,482 -- 19,982
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total Liabilities 716,554 164,786 (113,721) 767,619
--------- --------- --------- ---------

MEMBER'S EQUITY

Member's Interest 85,025 10,131 (10,131) 85,025
Other Capital 1,429 57,374 (57,374) 1,429
Unearned Compensation (1,132) -- -- (1,132)
Retained Deficit (26,001) (72,533) 72,533 (26,001)
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (15,299) -- -- (15,299)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total Member's Equity 44,022 (5,028) 5,028 44,022
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total Liabilities and Member's Equity $ 760,576 $ 159,758 $(108,693) $ 811,641
========= ========= ========= =========

-147-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
(DEBTORS-IN-POSSESSION AS OF JANUARY 31, 2003)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 26, 2003

DEBTOR NON- COMBINED
GUARANTORS GUARANTORS ELIMINATIONS TOTALS
---------- ---------- ------------ ------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net Loss $(61,576) $ (1,370) $ 1,370 $(61,576)
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Loss
to Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities:
Depreciation and Amortization 48,122 6,796 -- 54,918
Interest Accretion and Debt Issuance Cost Amortization 8,734 143 -- 8,877
Gain on Property Dispositions (274) (13) -- (287)
Other Operating Activities 571 (921) (3,820) (4,170)
Reorganization Items 24,344 -- -- 24,344
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:
Accounts Receivable (68,728) 32,263 -- (36,465)
Materials and Supplies 2,686 (405) -- 2,281
Accrued Interest 6,497 (12) -- 6,485
Other Current Assets 5,645 (7,162) -- (1,517)
Other Liabilities 33,810 (21,007) -- 12,803
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities (169) 8,312 (2,450) 5,693

Reorganization Items Paid (21,759) -- -- (21,759)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Operating Activities (21,928) 8,312 (2,450) (16,066)
-------- -------- -------- --------

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Property Additions (8,271) (938) -- (9,209)
Proceeds from Property Dispositions 2,408 14 -- 2,422
Net Change in Restricted Cash -- (1,426) -- (1,426)
Other Investing Activities (3,603) (1) -- (3,604)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities (9,466) (2,351) -- (11,817)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Short-Term Borrowings 5,146 -- -- 5,146
DIP Credit Facility Borrowing 50,000 -- -- 50,000
Long-Term Debt Repaid (317) (2,887) -- (3,204)
Bank Overdrafts 325 -- -- 325
Debt Costs (3,001) -- -- (3,001)
Cash Dividends Paid -- (2,450) 2,450 --
Other Financing (604) -- -- (604)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities 51,549 (5,337) 2,450 48,662
-------- -------- -------- --------

Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents 20,155 624 -- 20,779
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year 11,518 2,978 -- 14,496
-------- -------- -------- --------
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year $ 31,673 $ 3,602 $ -- $ 35,275
======== ======== ======== ========

-148-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE PERIOD
MAY 29, 2002 THROUGH DECEMBER 27, 2002

NON- COMBINED
GUARANTORS GUARANTORS ELIMINATIONS TOTALS
---------- ---------- ------------ ------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net (Loss) Income $(26,001) $ 1,802 $ (1,802) $(26,001)
Adjustments to Reconcile Net (Loss) Income
to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities:
Depreciation and Amortization 33,766 3,641 -- 37,407
Interest Accretion and Debt Issuance Cost Amortization 3,962 71 -- 4,033
Other Operating Activities 2,835 4,314 (4,398) 2,751
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:
Accounts Receivable (508) (18,377) 8,785 (10,100)
Materials and Supplies 1,949 162 -- 2,111
Accrued Interest 16,046 (639) -- 15,407
Other Current Assets 922 5,444 -- 6,366
Other Current Liabilities (9,723) 13,112 (8,785) (5,396)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities 23,248 9,530 (6,200) 26,578

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Property Additions (7,639) (118) -- (7,757)
Proceeds from Property Dispositions 1,089 -- -- 1,089
Net Change in Restricted Cash -- 236 -- 236
Other Investing Activities (906) 12 -- (894)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing Activities (7,456) 130 -- (7,326)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Short-Term Borrowings 7,000 -- -- 7,000
Long-Term Debt Repaid (25,713) (2,640) -- (28,353)
Cash Dividends Paid -- (6,200) 6,200 --
Bank Overdrafts (1,785) -- -- (1,785)
Debt Costs (1,035) -- -- (1,035)
Other Financing (1,468) -- -- (1,468)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities (23,001) (8,840) 6,200 (25,641)
-------- -------- -------- --------

Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents (7,209) 820 -- (6,389)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period 18,727 2,158 -- 20,885
-------- -------- -------- --------
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period $ 11,518 $ 2,978 $ -- $ 14,496
======== ======== ======== ========

-149-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE PERIOD
DECEMBER 29, 2001 THROUGH MAY 28, 2002

NON- COMBINED
GUARANTORS GUARANTORS ELIMINATIONS TOTALS
---------- ---------- ------------ ------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net Loss $(44,010) $ (5,096) $ 5,096 $(44,010)
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Loss to Net Cash (Used in)
Provided by Operating Activities:
Depreciation and Amortization 19,413 2,411 -- 21,824
Interest Accretion and Debt Issuance Cost Amortization 1,235 10 -- 1,245
Gain on Property Dispositions (452) (3) -- (455)
Other Operating Activities 459 (785) (5,096) (5,422)
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:
Accounts Receivable (18,565) 2,958 12,367 (3,240)
Materials and Supplies (5,139) (21) -- (5,160)
Accrued Interest 10,331 1 -- 10,332
Other Current Assets (4,427) 1,278 -- (3,149)
Other Current Liabilities 20,029 695 (12,367) 8,357
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Operating Activities (21,126) 1,448 -- (19,678)

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Property Additions (5,554) (51) -- (5,605)
Proceeds from Property Dispositions 985 3 -- 988
Other Investing Activities (2,276) 5 (588) (2,859)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities (6,845) (43) (588) (7,476)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Danielson Holding Corporation Investment 25,000 -- -- 25,000
Cash Dividends Paid -- (588) 588 --
Long-Term Debt Repaid (25,190) -- -- (25,190)
Bank Overdrafts 1,149 -- -- 1,149
Other Financing Activities (173) -- -- (173)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities 786 (588) 588 786
-------- -------- -------- --------

Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents (27,185) 817 -- (26,368)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period 45,912 1,341 -- 47,253
-------- -------- -------- --------
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period $ 18,727 $ 2,158 $ -- $ 20,885
======== ======== ======== ========

-150-

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES LLC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 28, 2001

NON- COMBINED
GUARANTORS GUARANTORS ELIMINATIONS TOTALS
---------- ---------- ------------ ------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net Loss $ (5,820) $ (4,557) $ 4,557 $ (5,820)
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Loss
to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities:
Depreciation and Amortization 50,364 5,133 -- 55,497
Interest Accretion and Debt Issuance Cost Amortization 4,413 -- -- 4,413
Gain on Property Dispositions (16,498) -- -- (16,498)
Other Operating Activities (2,196) 5,018 (4,557) (1,735)
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:
Accounts Receivable 6,349 (32,340) 13,981 (12,010)
Materials and Supplies (1,119) (265) -- (1,384)
Accrued Interest 413 -- -- 413
Other Current Assets (14,648) 9,650 -- (4,998)
Other Current Liabilities (11,859) 18,569 -- 6,710
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities 9,399 1,208 13,981 24,588

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Property Additions (13,165) (6,607) -- (19,772)
Investment in Vessel Leasing LLC (6,808) -- -- (6,808)
Proceeds from Property Dispositions 23,918 -- -- 23,918
Proceeds from Sale of Terminals 7,818 -- -- 7,818
Proceeds from Property Condemnation 2,730 -- -- 2,730
Other Investing Activities (9,055) 1,846 2,615 (4,594)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities 5,438 (4,761) 2,615 3,292

FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Short-Term Borrowings 17,250 -- -- 17,250
Long-Term Debt Repaid (47,937) -- -- (47,937)
Borrowing from Affiliates -- 567 (567) --
Affiliate Debt Repaid -- (567) 567 --
Bank Overdrafts (6,670) -- -- (6,670)
Debt Costs (3,463) -- -- (3,463)
Cash Dividends Paid -- (1,000) 1,000 --
Other Financing 625 3,615 (3,615) 625
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing Activities (40,195) 2,615 (2,615) (40,195)
-------- -------- -------- --------

Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents (25,358) (938) 13,981 (12,315)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year 57,289 2,279 -- 59,568
-------- -------- -------- --------
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year $ 31,931 $ 1,341 $ 13,981 $ 47,253
======== ======== ======== ========

-151-

Report of Independent Auditors

To Board of Managers
American Commercial Lines LLC

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statement of financial position of
American Commercial Lines LLC as of December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows, and member's
(deficit) equity for the year ended December 26, 2003 and for the periods from
December 29, 2001 to May 28, 2002 and May 29, 2002 to December 27, 2002. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the consolidated financial position of American
Commercial Lines LLC at December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002, and the
consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended
December 26, 2003 and for the periods from December 29, 2001 to May 28, 2002 and
May 29, 2002 to December 27, 2002, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming American
Commercial Lines LLC will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to
the financial statements, on January 31, 2003, American Commercial Lines LLC,
its parent and certain of its subsidiaries filed a voluntary petition for
reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (""Chapter
11''). The Company is currently operating its business under the jurisdiction of
Chapter 11 and the United States Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of
Indiana (the ""Bankruptcy Court''), and continuation of the Company as a going
concern is contingent upon, among other things, the ability to formulate a plan
of reorganization which will be approved by the requisite parties under the
United States Bankruptcy Code and be confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court, the
ability to comply with its debtor-in-possession financing facility, obtain
adequate financing sources, and the ability to generate sufficient cash flows
from operations to meet its future obligations. These conditions raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The
financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible
future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts
and classification of liabilities that may result from the outcome of this
uncertainty.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG, LLP

Louisville, Kentucky
February 20, 2004

-152-

Report of Independent Accountants

The Board of Managers
American Commercial Lines LLC

In our opinion, based on our audit and the report of other auditors who have
ceased operations, the consolidated financial statements listed in the Index
appearing under Item 15(a)(2) present fairly, in all material respects, the
results operations of American Commercial Lines LLC (ACL) and their cash flows
for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2001, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial
statements are the responsibility of ACL's management; our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We did not
audit the financial statements of UABL Limited (UABL), a 50% owned subsidiary,
for 2001, which statements reflect 27% of consolidated net loss for the fiscal
year ended December 28, 2001. Those statements were audited by other auditors
who have ceased operations and whose report thereon dated March 26, 2002 has
been furnished to us, and our opinion expressed herein, insofar as it relates to
the amounts included for UABL is based solely on the report of the other
auditors who have ceased operations. We conducted our audit of these statements
in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of
America, which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audit and the report of other auditors who have ceased operations provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, during the
fourth quarter of 2001 the Company prospectively increased its estimate of the
useful lives of towboats, which reduced the loss before extraordinary items and
the net loss by $1.1 million for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2001.
Additionally, the consolidated financial statements reflect the restatement
described in Note 12 to the December 28, 2001 consolidated financial statements
(which Note is not presented separately herein).

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming
that ACL will continue as a going concern. ACL incurred a substantial loss
during 2001. As discussed in Note 4 to the December 28, 2001 consolidated
financial statements (which Note is not presented separately herein), subsequent
to December 28, 2001 ACL also defaulted on its Senior Notes and Senior Credit
Facilities and has determined that it is not likely that it will be able to meet
the covenant requirements included in the Senior Credit Facilities agreement for
2002. Accordingly, ACL's outstanding debt has been classified as current in its
consolidated balance sheet at December 28, 2001. The above facts raise
substantial doubt that ACL's ability to continue as a going concern.
Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 4 to
the December 28, 2001 consolidated financial statements (which Note is not
presented separately herein). The financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Louisville, Kentucky
March 26, 2002, except for the restatement described
above, as to which the date is August 13, 2002.

-153-