Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

Commission file number 0-22085

LORAL ORION, INC.

500 Hills Drive, Bedminster, NJ 07921

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

11 1/4% Senior Notes Due 2007

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ          No o

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12 b-20. Yes o          No x

      Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [Not Applicable]

      The number of shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share of the registrant outstanding as of December 31, 2002 was 100, all of which were owned, directly or indirectly, by Loral Space & Communications Ltd. The aggregate market value of the common shares held by affiliates was zero.

      THE REGISTRANT MEETS THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN GENERAL INSTRUCTION I(1)(a) AND (b) OF FORM 10-K AND IS THEREFORE FILING WITH THE REDUCED DISCLOSURE FORMAT PURSUANT TO GENERAL INSTRUCTION I(2) OF FORM 10-K.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

None

________________________________________________________________________________

Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1.     Business

General

      Loral Orion, Inc. (“we”, “us”, “Loral Orion” or the “Company”), is a provider of satellite-based communications services, providing fixed satellite services, including video distribution and other satellite transmission services.

Business Segment

      The Company operates in one business segment, Fixed Satellite Services. On December 21, 2001, the Company, in connection with completing exchange offers for its outstanding senior notes and senior discount notes, transferred its data services business to a subsidiary of Loral Space & Communications Ltd. (“Loral”) and has accounted for the former data business as a discontinued operation.

      Loral Orion, through its ownership of three high power geostationary satellites, and with agreements with Loral Skynet, a division of Loral SpaceCom Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Loral, provides transmission capacity to cable and television programmers, news and information networks, telecommunications companies, Internet service providers, ISPs and other carriers for a variety of applications. The Company’s customers include HBO, Disney, Cable & Wireless and United Pan Europe Communications. A majority of the Company’s transmission capacity services consist of video services. The Company generally offers transmission capacity services under long-term contracts and also offers occasional use services for periods of up to a few hundred hours. Unless otherwise indicated, all transponder references for the Company’s satellites are in 36 MHz equivalents.

      About 200 commercial geosynchronous satellites currently offer fixed satellite services. The Company competes primarily with large fleet operators, including PanAmSat Corporation, SES Global, Intelsat and Eutelsat. Large fleets offer customers global or near-global coverage and in-orbit backup in case of a satellite failure. The Company is a member of the Loral Global Alliance, whose other members include Loral Skynet, Skynet do Brasil, Satelites Mexicanos, S.A de C.V. and Europe*Star Limited. The Loral Global Alliance, with ten satellites currently and 15 expected, enhances the geographic reach, market presence and offerings of Loral Orion.

      In providing fixed satellite services, the Company faces competition from fiber optic cable and other terrestrial delivery systems. In some applications, such as broadcast or point-to-multipoint transmission of video, satellites are usually considerably more efficient. In other applications, fiber may cost less, so that satellites compete on the basis of superior reliability, or as a back-up service.

      Telstar 11, a high power satellite with 48 Ku-band transponders, commenced operations in January 1995, and provides coverage in North America as far west as Phoenix, Arizona and in Europe as far east as Istanbul, Turkey.

      Telstar 12, a high power satellite with 57 Ku-band transponders, commenced operations in January 2000 and expands Loral Orion’s European coverage and extends coverage to portions of Russia, Latin America, the Middle East and South Africa. Telstar 12 was launched in October 1999 into 15 degrees W.L.

      Telstar 10/ Apstar IIR, formerly known as Apstar IIR, a high power satellite with 28 C-Band and 24 Ku-Band transponders, commenced operations in December 1997 and covers portions of Asia, Europe, Africa and Australia, accounting for more than 75% of the world’s population. Loral Orion purchased all of Telstar 10/ Apstar IIR’s transponder capacity (other than a single, reserved C-Band transponder) from APT Satellite Company in September 1999.

      On September 20, 2002, Loral Orion entered into an agreement with APT Satellite Company Limited (“APT”) pursuant to which Loral Orion will purchase a 50% interest in the Telstar 18/ Apstar V satellite, a satellite under construction by Space Systems/ Loral (“SS/ L”) for APT. Loral Orion’s aggregate purchase price for its 50% interest in the satellite is $115.1 million, representing 50% of the current estimated project

1

Table of Contents

      Pursuant to Loral Orion’s agreement with APT, Loral Orion will pay one-half the purchase price prior to launch for 13.5 transponders on the satellite. The corresponding cumulative costs relating to these transponders have been reflected as satellites under construction on Loral Orion’s condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2002. Subject to certain acceleration rights on the part of Loral Orion, the remainder of the purchase price for the second 13.5 transponders will be paid by Loral Orion as follows: on the second anniversary of the satellite’s in-service date, $10.66 million for 2.5 additional transponders; on the third anniversary of the satellite’s in-service date, $12.79 million for three additional transponders; and on each of the fourth and fifth anniversaries of the satellite’s in-service date, $17.05 million for four additional transponders. Title to these transponders will pass to Loral Orion upon its payments thereon. As a result of finalizing the Telstar 18/ Apstar V launch arrangements in March 2003, Loral Orion agreed to take two fewer transponders without any corresponding change to the transponder cost borne by each of the parties. Loral SpaceCom has agreed to purchase from Loral Orion 4.75 transponders on Telstar 18/Apstar V, together with a lease of an additional transponder for an approximate two year period from the Telstar 18/Apstar V in-service date.

Agreements with Loral Skynet and Loral

      Loral Orion and Loral Skynet, entered into agreements (the “Loral Skynet Agreements”) effective January 1, 1999, whereby Loral Skynet provides to Loral Orion (i) marketing and sales of satellite capacity services on the Loral Orion satellite network and related billing and administration of customer contracts for those services (the “Sales Services”) and (ii) telemetry, tracking and control services for the Loral Orion satellite network (the “Technical Services”, and together with the Sales Services, the “Services”). The Company is charged Loral Skynet’s costs for providing these services plus a 5 percent administrative fee. Loral Orion believes it has achieved cost efficiencies in connection with the Loral Skynet Agreements.

      Beginning in 2002, Loral initiated the allocation of corporate management expenses to its individual subsidiaries and divisions, including $3.1 million to Loral Orion. The allocation of these expenses is computed with respect to Loral Orion in a manner consistent with Loral’s other subsidiaries and divisions, using a fixed formula based on three factors: employee payroll, revenues and assets.

Exchange Offers and Transfer of Data Business

      In December 2001, the Company successfully completed exchange offers for $841 million aggregate principal amount of 11.25% senior notes due 2007 and 12.50% senior discount notes due 2007 in exchange for $613 million principal amount of the Company’s 10% senior notes due July 15, 2006, which 10% senior notes are guaranteed by Loral, together with five-year warrants to purchase 6,042,986 shares of Loral’s common stock at a purchase price of $2.37 per share and $59,753 in cash paid to certain holders of new senior notes in lieu of receipt of a principal amount of new senior notes in a denomination other than an integral multiple of $1,000. The exchange offers were part of a plan to reduce and refinance the Company’s indebtedness and to create a capital structure that is intended to permit the Company to finance anticipated obligations with respect to its fixed satellite services business. Approximately $37 million principal amount of the original

2

Table of Contents

      In connection with the consummation of the exchange offers, Loral SpaceCom Corporation agreed to cancel its $79.7 million intercompany note issued to it by the Company which ranked pari passu to the senior debt in exchange for the transfer of the Company’s data services business to a newly formed Loral subsidiary, and the issuance of a new note to Loral SpaceCom Corporation in the principal amount of $29.7 million due 2006, having an interest rate of 10% per annum payable in kind, subordinated to the Company’s new senior notes and guaranteed by Loral.

Summary Satellite Data

      The following table presents a brief description of the Company’s satellite network. The Company is subject to regulation and licensing by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission and other national telecommunications regulatory bodies, and to the frequency coordination process of the International Telecommunications Union, or ITU.

      All satellite systems are subject to ITU frequency coordination requirements and must obtain appropriate authority to provide service in a given territory. The result of the required international coordination process may limit the extent to which all or some portion of a particular authorized orbital slot may be used for commercial operations. In addition, the result of the process by which satellite systems must seek authorization to provide service in a given territory may limit the extent to which such service may be provided from a given orbital location.

      The Company’s ability to provide satellite service in the geographic regions noted below will be subject to technical constraints, international coordination, local regulatory approval and any limitations on the scope of the approval so obtained.

Employees

      As of December 31, 2002, Loral Orion and its subsidiaries had no full time employees. See Loral Skynet Agreements.

3

Table of Contents

CERTAIN FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS

      This annual report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, from time to time, we, Loral or our representatives have made or may make forward-looking statements, orally or in writing. They can be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as “believes”, “expects”, “plans”, “may”, “will”, “would”, “could”, “should”, “anticipates”, “estimates”, “project”, “intend”, or “outlook” or their negatives or other variations of these words or other comparable words, or by discussions of strategy that involve risks and uncertainties. Such forward-looking statements may be included in, but are not limited to, various filings made by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission, press releases or oral statements made by or with the approval of an authorized executive officer. We warn you that forward-looking statements are only predictions. Actual events or results may differ materially as a result of risks that we face, including those presented below. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements. The following are representative of factors that could affect the outcome of the forward-looking statements.

Financial Structure

We have substantial debt.

      As of December 31, 2002, we had $960 million of senior debt. Our 10% senior notes mature in 2006 and are guaranteed by Loral. In addition, our 11.25% senior notes and 12.50% senior discount notes mature in 2007. Our ability to meet our debt service obligations will be dependent upon our future performance, including our ability to sustain our revenues, which will be subject to financial, business, competitive and other factors, including factors beyond our control. There can be no assurance that we will be able to generate sufficient cash flow to meet our debt service obligations with respect to all of our outstanding indebtedness, if there was an uninsured loss of one of our satellites or as a result of other factors beyond our control.

If our business plan does not succeed, our operations might not generate enough cash to pay our obligations.

      For the year ended December 31, 2002, we had a deficiency of earnings to cover fixed charges of approximately $5.4 million. In addition to our debt service requirements, our business are capital intensive and need substantial investment before returns can be realized. At December 31, 2002, the Company had incurred costs of approximately $18 million (of which we had paid $3 million) related to the construction of Telstar 18/Apstar V it intends to launch in 2003. The Company will need to incur approximately $11 million of additional costs to complete the construction, launch and insure Telstar 18/Apstar V and an additional $58 million to acquire additional transponders on Telstar 18/Apstar V to be paid in installments over the second through fifth anniversaries of the launch. We are subject to substantial financial risks from possible delays or reductions in revenue, unforeseen capital needs or unforeseen expenses. If this were to occur, our ability to meet our obligations and execute our business plan could depend upon our ability, and that of our operating subsidiaries and affiliates, to raise cash in the capital markets. We are uncertain whether this source of cash will be available in the future on favorable terms if at all. Moreover, in connection with amendments to certain of its bank facilities entered in March 2003, Loral’s ability to make investments in or otherwise make payment to any of its subsidiaries, including us, has been limited to a maximum amount of $5 million.

Our debt imposes restrictions and otherwise affects our ability to undertake certain actions.

      The indentures relating to our 10% senior notes contain restrictions, which among other things, limit our ability to incur other indebtedness, create liens, make investments, sell assets, pay dividends and engage in mergers and acquisitions. In addition, the level of our indebtedness adversely affects:

	•	our ability to pay expenses and fund expenditures, which will be affected by our need to use a substantial amount of our cash flow to service existing indebtedness;
	•	our ability to raise additional debt; and
	•	our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes to our business and market conditions.

4

Table of Contents

Operational Risks

Launch failures have delayed some of our operations in the past and may do so again in the future.

      We depend on third parties, in the United States and abroad, to launch our satellites. Satellite launches are risky, and some launch attempts have ended in failure. We ordinarily insure against launch failures, but at considerable cost. The cost and the availability of insurance vary depending on market conditions and the launch vehicle used. Our insurance typically does not cover business interruption, and launch failures may therefore result in uninsured economic losses. Replacement of a lost satellite typically requires at least 24 months from the time a contract is executed until the launch date of the replacement satellite.

After launch, our satellites remain vulnerable to in-orbit failures, which may result in uninsured losses.

      Failure of satellite components in space may result in damage to or loss of a satellite before the end of its expected life. In-orbit failure may result from various causes, some random, including component failure, loss of power or fuel, inability to maintain positioning of the satellite, solar and other astronomical events, and space debris. Satellites are carefully built and tested and have some redundant components to permit the continued operation of a satellite in case of a component failure. Due to the failure of a primary component, one of our satellites is currently operating using a back-up component. If this back-up component fails and the primary component cannot be restored, this satellite could lose a significant amount of capacity or be a total loss, which, until a replacement satellite is placed in-orbit, would result in lost revenue and lost profits to the Company. Repair of satellites in space is not feasible. Many factors affect the useful life of our satellites including fuel consumption, the quality of construction, degradation of solar panels and the durability of components.

Telstar 10/ Apstar IIR has experienced operational problems with its solar arrays.

      Telstar 10/ Apstar IIR has experienced minor losses of power from its solar arrays. Although, to date, Telstar 10/ Apstar IIR has not experienced any degradation in performance, there can be no assurance that Telstar 10/ Apstar IIR will not experience additional power loss that could result in performance degradation, including loss of transponder capacity. In the event of additional power loss, the extent of the performance degradation, if any, will depend on numerous factors, including the amount of the additional power loss, when in the life of Telstar 10/ Apstar IIR the loss occurred, and the number and type of use being made of transponders then in service. It is also possible that one or more transponders on a satellite may need to be removed from service to accommodate the power loss and to preserve full performance capabilities of the remaining transponders. A complete or partial loss of Telstar 10/ Apstar IIR could result in a loss of revenues and profits. Based upon information currently available, including design redundancies to accommodate small power losses and that no pattern has been identified as to the timing or specific location within the solar arrays of the failures, we believe that this matter will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

It may be difficult to obtain full insurance coverage for satellites that have experienced problems in the past.

      While we have in the past, consistent with industry practice and the requirements of our indenture, typically obtained in-orbit insurance for our satellites, we cannot guarantee that, upon a policy’s expiration, we will be able to renew the insurance on terms acceptable to us, especially on satellites that have, or that are part of a family of satellites that have, experienced problems in the past. Telstar 10/ Apstar IIR was manufactured by SS/ L and has the same solar array configuration as two other 1300-class satellites manufactured by SS/ L that have experienced solar array failures. SS/ L believes that these failures are isolated events and does not reflect a systemic problem in either the satellite design or manufacturing process. Accordingly, SS/ L believes that these anomalies will not affect Telstar 10/ Apstar IIR. The insurance coverage for Telstar 10/ Apstar IIR provides for coverage of losses due to solar array failures only in the event of a capacity loss of 75% or more. One other satellite owned by Loral Orion has the same solar array configuration as Telstar 10/ Apstar IIR. There can be no assurance that the insurers will not require either exclusions of, or similar limitations on,

5

Table of Contents

We are faced with increased costs due to the recent trend in the insurance industry towards higher insurance premiums and shorter terms.

      We, like others in the satellite industry, are faced with significantly higher premiums on launch and in-orbit insurance, increasing thresholds in determining total losses for satellites in orbit and significantly shorter coverage periods than those that have been available in the past, which was due in part to the events of September 11, 2001. This development in the insurance industry has increased our cost of doing business. We intend to pass on some of the increased cost to our customers. There can be no assurance, however, that we will be able to do so. Insurance market conditions have historically been cyclical in nature. While we anticipate that these conditions will improve in the future, there can be no assurance that they will.

We compete for market share and customers; technological developments from competitors or others may reduce demand for our services.

      We face heavy competition in fixed satellite services from companies such as PanAmSat Corporation, SES Global and newly privatized organizations such as Intelsat and Eutelsat. Competition in this market may lower prices or result in reduced satellite fleet utilization, which may have an adverse effect on our consolidated financial position and our results of operations. We also face competition from fiber optic cable and other terrestrial delivery systems, which have a cost advantage in point-to-point applications. In addition, there is currently heightened competition among fixed satellite services providers as a result of an excess supply of transponders in the market, declining utilization by existing customers and lack of new customers entering the market. Moreover, we have recently experienced a higher rate of customer defaults than in previous years which trend, if it continues, will further increase the overcapacity in the market.

      As land-based telecommunications services expand, demand for some satellite-based services may be reduced. New technology could render satellite-based services less competitive by satisfying consumer demand in other ways or through the use of incompatible standards. We also compete for local regulatory approval in places in which both we and a competitor may want to operate, and for scarce frequency assignments and fixed orbital positions.

Our business is regulated, causing uncertainty and additional costs.

      Our business is regulated by authorities in multiple jurisdictions, including the Federal Communications Commission, the International Telecommunication Union, or ITU, and the European Union. The following are some strategically important activities which are regulated and could be adversely affected by regulatory policies:

	•	the operation of our business in the U.S. and foreign markets;
	•	the launch of satellites; and
	•	the international service offered by our business operations.

      Regulatory authorities in the various jurisdictions in which we operate can modify, withdraw or impose charges or conditions upon, or deny or delay action on applications for, the licenses which we need, and so increase our costs. The regulatory process also requires potentially costly negotiations with third parties operating or intending to operate satellites at or near orbital locations where we place our satellites so that the frequencies of those other satellites do not interfere with our own. For example, as part of our coordination effort on Telstar 12, we agreed to provide four 54 MHz transponders on Telstar 12 to Eutelsat for the life of

6

Table of Contents

      Failure to successfully coordinate our satellites’ frequencies or to resolve other required regulatory approvals could have an adverse effect on our consolidated financial position and our results of operations.

We face risks in conducting business internationally.

      For the year ended December 31, 2002, approximately 43% of our revenue was generated from customers located outside of the United States. We could be harmed financially and operationally by changes in foreign regulations and telecommunications standards, tariffs or taxes and other trade barriers. Almost all of our contracts with foreign customers require payment in U.S. dollars, and customers in developing countries could have difficulty obtaining U.S. dollars to pay us due to currency exchange controls and other factors. Exchange rate fluctuations may adversely affect the ability of our customers to pay us in U.S. dollars. If we need to pursue legal remedies against our foreign business partners or customers, we may have to sue them abroad where it could be difficult for us to enforce our rights.

Other Matters

The rights of holders of our 11.25% senior notes and 12.50% senior discount notes under their indentures have been substantially reduced.

      In December 2001, as part of our exchange offers, the indentures for our 11.25% senior notes and 12.50% senior discount notes were amended so as to remove substantially all of their operating restrictions and events of default.

The market for our 11.25% senior notes and 12.50% senior discount notes is limited.

      Because the exchange offers that we conducted in December 2001 resulted in the tender and exchange of substantially all of our 11.25% senior notes and 12.50% senior discount notes then outstanding, the market for the remaining notes is quite limited. Moreover, we cannot guarantee that these notes will continue to be rated in the future.

      Loral Orion does not own or lease office space. See Loral Skynet Agreements.

      The Company is party to legal and regulatory proceedings incident to its business. The Company does not believe that there are any material legal proceedings pending or, to the knowledge of its management, threatened against, the Company or its subsidiaries that would have a material effect on its consolidated financial position or its results of operations.

      Omitted pursuant to General Instruction I of Form 10-K.

7

Table of Contents

PART II

      All of the Company’s outstanding common stock is owned, directly or indirectly, by Loral Space & Communications Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Loral Space & Communications Ltd. (“Loral”). Therefore, there is no public trading market for the Company’s common stock. The Company has never paid dividends on its common stock. The Company’s indenture relating to its 10% senior notes obligations includes certain restrictions on the Company’s ability to pay dividends or make loans to its parent.

      Omitted pursuant to General Instruction I of Form 10-K.

      Except for the historical information contained herein, the matters discussed in the following Management’s Narrative Analysis of Results of Operations of Loral Orion, Inc. (“Loral Orion” or the “Company”) are not historical facts, but are “forward-looking statements,” as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In addition, the Company or its representatives have made and may continue to make forward-looking statements, orally or in writing, in other contexts, such as in reports filed with the SEC, press releases or statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer of the Company. These forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “believes,” “expects,” “plans,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “project,” “intend,” or “outlook” or the negative of these words or other variations of these words or other comparable words, or by discussion of strategy that involves risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are only predictions, and actual events or results may differ materially as a result of a wide variety of factors and conditions, many of which are beyond the Company’s control. Some of the factors and conditions that could affect the outcome of forward-looking statements relate to (i) the Company’s financial structure, (ii) operational risks and (iii) other matters. For a detailed discussion of these factors and conditions, please refer to the section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K titled “Certain Factors that May Affect Future Results” beginning on page 4 and to the other periodic reports filed with the SEC by Loral Orion. In addition, the Company cautions you that the Company operates in an industry sector where securities values may be volatile and may be influenced by economic and other factors beyond the Company’s control. The Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

General

      The principal business of Loral Orion is leasing transponder capacity on its satellites to its customers for various applications, including broadcasting, news gathering, Internet access and transmission, private voice and data networks, business television, distance learning and direct-to-home television (“DTH”). Loral Skynet, a division of Loral SpaceCom Corporation, which is a subsidiary of Loral Space & Communications Corporation, which is in turn a subsidiary of Loral, manages the Company’s continuing operations.

      The Company operates in one segment, Fixed Satellite Services. On December 21, 2001, the Company, in connection with the exchange offers for its outstanding senior notes and senior discount notes, transferred its data services business to a subsidiary of Loral and has accounted for the former data business as a discontinued operation.

      The Company’s revenues from continuing operations are principally generated from long-term contracts or occasional use services for transmission capacity services.

      No restrictions exist on the ability of any of the subsidiaries of Loral Orion (“Subsidiary Guarantors”) other than inconsequential subsidiaries, to pay dividends or make other distributions to the Company, except to the extent provided by law generally (e.g., adequate capital to pay dividends under state corporate laws).

8

Table of Contents

Critical accounting matters

      The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the amounts of revenues and expenses reported for the period. Actual results could differ from estimates.

      Depreciation is provided for on the straight-line method for satellites over the estimated useful life of the satellite, which is determined by engineering analyses performed at the in-service date and re-evaluated periodically. A decrease in the useful life of a satellite would result in increased depreciation expense.

      The Company is required to estimate the collectibility of its receivables. A considerable amount of judgment is required in assessing the realization of these receivables, including the current creditworthiness of each customer and related aging of the past due balances. The Company evaluates specific accounts when it becomes aware of a situation where a customer may not be able to meet its financial obligations due to a deterioration of its financial condition, credit ratings or bankruptcy. The reserve requirements are based on the best facts available to the Company and re-evaluated periodically.

      The Company is included in the U.S. federal income tax return of its parent company, Loral Space & Communications Corporation. Pursuant to annual tax sharing agreements with its parent, the Company is entitled to reimbursement for the parent’s use of the Company’s net operating losses. The Company has been credited with cumulative reimbursements of $48.6 million through December 31, 2002

      The Company uses the liability method in accounting for taxes whereby income taxes are recognized during the year in which transactions enter into the determination of financial statement income or loss. Deferred taxes reflect the future tax effect of temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial and income tax reporting and are measured by applying statutory tax rates in effect for the year during which the differences are expected to reverse.

      Realization of the net deferred tax assets is dependent on the Company’s ability to generate future taxable income and its utilization of tax planning strategies. The Company assesses the recoverability of its loss carryforwards and other deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis and, based upon this analysis, records a valuation allowance to the extent recoverability does not satisfy the “more likely than not” recognition criteria in SFAS No. 109. The Company will maintain the valuation allowance until sufficient positive evidence exists to support reversal of the reserve. When the Company determines that it will be able to realize all or part of the benefit from its deferred tax assets, reversal of the valuation allowance will increase income in the period such determination is made.

      Contingencies by their nature relate to uncertainties that require management to exercise judgment both in assessing the likelihood that a liability has been incurred as well as in estimating the amount of potential loss, if any. The most important contingencies affecting our financial statements are detailed below under Operational Matters.

     Results of Operations

      In evaluating financial performance, management uses revenues and operating income (loss) before depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) as a measure of a segment’s profit or loss. The following discusses the results of Loral Orion for 2002, 2001 and 2000.

9

Table of Contents

Operating Revenues from Continuing Operations (in millions):

EBITDA⁽²⁾ (in millions):

(1)	Represents sales to the Company’s discontinued operation (formerly the data business).
(2)	EBITDA (which is equivalent to operating income (loss) before depreciation and amortization) is provided because it is a measure commonly used in the communications industry to analyze companies on the basis of operating performance, leverage and liquidity and is presented to enhance the understanding of the Company’s operating results. However, EBITDA should not be construed as an alternative to net income as an indicator of a company’s operating performance, or cash flow from operations as a measure of a company’s liquidity. EBITDA may be calculated differently and, therefore, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.

     Revenues from continuing operations for 2002, 2001 and 2000, were $109.7 million, $108.9 million and $83.4 million, respectively. The increase resulted from the inclusion of revenues from the Company’s former data services business in 2002, which were eliminated in 2001 and 2000 (see Exchange Offers), offset by reduced prices and volume resulting from the global economic downturn in 2002, which has caused a delay in the demand for new telecommunications applications and services. The increase for the prior year resulted from an increase in the number of transponders leased and higher revenue per transponder in 2001 as compared to the respective prior year, primarily resulting from the addition of two satellites to our fleet in the latter part of 1999 (see below).

      Cost of satellite services for continuing operations for 2002, 2001 and 2000, were $91.4 million, $107.2 million and $104.6 million, respectively. The decrease in 2002 as compared to 2001 and 2000 is primarily due to reduced goodwill amortization resulting from the Company’s adoption of SFAS No. 142 (see Accounting Pronouncements), slightly offset by increased insurance costs as a result of the Company renewing the insurance on one of its satellites after September 11, 2001.

      Selling, general and administrative expenses for continuing operations for 2002, 2001 and 2000, were $11.1 million, $10.8 million and $12.8 million, respectively. The increase in 2002 as compared to 2001 was primarily due to corporate management expenses allocated by Loral in 2002 (see Operational Matters), offset by a decrease in marketing, general and administrative expenses. The decrease in 2001 as compared to 2000 was primarily due to a reduction in marketing expenses.

      Interest income for continuing operations for 2002, 2001 and 2000, was $0.6 million, $0.7 million and $3.0 million, respectively. The decrease in 2001 as compared to 2000 was primarily due to a reduction in the balances held for investment.

      Interest expense for 2002, 2001 and 2000 was $13.0 million, $98.3 million and $97.2 million, respectively. The decrease in 2002 as compared to 2001 and 2000 was primarily due to the Company not recognizing any interest expense on it’s 10% senior notes since interest expense is fully offset by amortization of the deferred gain on the exchange offers and lower interest expense on the Company’s senior notes and senior discount notes that were exchanged for 10% senior notes in connection with the exchange offers completed in December 2001 (see Exchange Offers).

10

Table of Contents

      During December 2001, the Company recognized a gain of $34.5 million, related to the Company’s debt exchanges (See Exchange Offers).

      The provision for income taxes from continuing operations for 2002, 2001 and 2000 was $16.0 million, $4.0 million and $0.9 million on a pre-tax loss of $5.1 million, $72.2 million and $128.2 million, respectively. The increase in 2002 as compared to 2001 and 2000 was primarily due to the additional tax expense, recorded during the fourth quarter of 2002, to provide a full reserve against the Company’s deferred tax asset.

      The financial data presented for the Company’s former data business has been presented as a discontinued operation and reflects the historical sales and expenses of the data services segment after elimination of intercompany transactions with FSS. Discontinued operations include revenue for the data services segment of $80.2 million and $103.8 million for the period January 1, 2001 to December 21, 2001 and the year ended December 31, 2000, respectively. See Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements.

Results by Operating Business

      Segment revenues for 2002 were $109.7 million as compared to $128.1 million in 2001 and $108.7 in 2000. EBITDA on the same basis was $82.6 million in 2002, $104.6 million in 2001 and $81.2 million in 2000. The decreases in revenue and EBITDA in 2002 as compared to 2001 were primarily due to reduced prices and volume resulting from the global economic downturn in 2002, which has caused a delay in the demand for new telecommunications applications and services, offset by the inclusion of revenues from the Company’s former data services division in 2002, which were eliminated in 2001 and 2000 (see Exchange Offers). The increases in revenue and EBITDA in 2001 as compared to 2000 resulted from an increase in the number of transponders leased and higher revenue per transponder in 2001 as compared to 2000, primarily resulting from the addition of two satellites to our fleet in the latter part of 1999 (see below).

      At December 31, 2002, the Company had an external contracted backlog of approximately $453 million, as compared to $576 million at December 31, 2001. At December 31, 2002 contracted backlog was equivalent to approximately 4.25 times its 2002 revenues. The reduction in total contracted backlog resulted from contract terminations in the third and fourth quarters of 2001, as well as de-bookings arising largely from the restructuring of one customer contract in the second quarter of 2001, which reduced the length of the lease agreement from 13 years to eight. In this instance the Company received appropriate compensation in exchange for meeting its customer’s requirements and, accordingly, this de-booking did not have an adverse impact on results of operations in 2001, nor is it expected to have an adverse impact on near-term results of operations.

      The Company had total long-term debt of $960 million, including current portion of $65 million, outstanding at December 31, 2002, most of which matures in 2006. In addition to its debt service requirements, the Company’s business is capital intensive and requires substantial investment. Much of this investment has already been incurred primarily to launch the Company’s three satellites. At December 31, 2002, the Company had incurred costs of approximately $18 million (of which it has paid $3 million) related to the construction of Telstar 18/Apstar V which it intends to launch in 2003. The Company will need to incur approximately $11 million of additional costs to complete the construction, launch and insure Telstar 18/Apstar V and an additional $58 million to acquire additional transponders in the future on Telstar 18/Apstar V over the second through fifth anniversaries of the launch.

      At December 31, 2002 the Company had a retained deficit of $1 billion and stockholder’s deficit of $399 million. The Company has generated (used) cash from operating activities of $90 million, $24 million and $(48) million for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The Company believes its cash and net cash provided by operating activities will be adequate to meet its expected cash requirements through at least December 31, 2003. If the Company does not generate sufficient cash to satisfy its debt service and operating requirements, the Company may be required to seek alternative financing or

11

Table of Contents

      In November 1995, a component on Telstar 11 malfunctioned, resulting in a 2-hour service interruption. The malfunctioning component supported nine transponders serving the European portion of Telstar 11’s footprint. Full service was restored using a back-up component. If that back-up component fails, Telstar 11 would lose a significant amount of usable capacity. In such event, while the Company would be entitled to insurance proceeds of approximately $195 million as of December 31, 2002, and could lease replacement capacity and function as a reseller with respect to such capacity, the loss of capacity would have a material adverse effect on the Company.

      Telstar 12, originally intended to operate at 12 degrees W.L., was launched aboard an Ariane launch vehicle in October 1999 into the orbital slot located at 15 degrees W.L., and commenced operations in January 2000. Under an agreement reached with Eutelsat, Loral Orion agreed to operate Telstar 12 at 15 degrees W.L. while Eutelsat continues to develop its services at 12.5 degrees W.L. Eutelsat has in turn agreed not to use its 14.8 degrees W.L. orbital slot and to assert its priority rights at such location on Loral Orion’s behalf. As part of this coordination effort, Loral Orion agreed to provide to Eutelsat four 54 MHz transponders on Telstar 12 for the life of the satellite and has retained risk of loss with respect to those transponders. Eutelsat also has the right to acquire, at cost, four transponders on the next replacement satellite for Telstar 12. As part of the international coordination process, Loral continues to conduct discussions with various administrations regarding Telstar 12’s operations at 15 degrees W.L. If these discussions are not successful, Telstar 12’s useable capacity may be reduced.

      Telstar 10/ Apstar IIR has experienced minor losses of power from its solar arrays. Although, to date, Telstar 10/ Apstar IIR has not experienced any degradation in performance, there can be no assurance that Telstar 10/ Apstar IIR will not experience additional power loss that could result in performance degradation, including loss of transponder capacity. In the event of additional power loss, the extent of the performance degradation, if any, will depend on numerous factors, including the amount of the additional power loss, when in the life of Telstar 10/ Apstar IIR the loss occurred, and the number and type of uses being made of transponders then in service. It is also possible that one or more transponders on a satellite may need to be removed from service to accommodate the power loss and to preserve full performance capabilities of the remaining transponders. A complete or partial loss of Telstar 10/ Apstar IIR could result in a loss of revenues and profits. Based upon information currently available, including design redundancies to accommodate small power losses and the fact that no pattern has been identified as to the timing or specific location within the solar arrays of the failures, the Company believes that this matter will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or our results of operations.

      While the Company has in the past, consistent with industry practice, typically obtained in-orbit insurance for our satellites, the Company cannot guarantee that, upon a policy’s expiration, the Company will be able to renew the insurance on terms acceptable to us, especially on satellites that have, or that are part of a family of satellites that have, experienced problems in the past. Telstar 10/ Apstar IIR, manufactured by SS/ L has the same solar array configuration as two other 1300-class satellites manufactured by SS/ L that have experienced solar array failures. SS/ L believes that these failures are isolated events and do not reflect a systemic problem in either the satellite design or manufacturing process. Accordingly, we do not believe that these anomalies will affect Telstar 10/ Apstar IIR. The insurance coverage for Telstar 10/ Apstar IIR provides for coverage of losses due to solar array failures only in the event of a capacity loss of 75% or more. One other satellite owned by Loral Orion has the same solar array configuration as Telstar 10/ Apstar IIR. There can be no assurance that the insurers will not require either exclusions of, or similar limitations on, coverage due to solar array failures in connection with the renewal of insurance for this satellite in 2004. An uninsured loss of a satellite would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position and results of operations. Some of Loral Orion’s bondholders have questioned whether this limitation is in compliance with the insurance covenant in the Loral Orion indenture. Loral Orion believes that it is in compliance with the

12

Table of Contents

      On September 20, 2002, Loral Orion entered into an agreement with APT Satellite Company Limited (“APT”) pursuant to which Loral Orion will purchase a 50% interest in the Telstar 18/ Apstar V satellite, a satellite under construction by SS/ L for APT. Loral Orion’s aggregate purchase price for its 50% interest in the satellite is $115.1 million, representing 50% of the current estimated project cost of constructing, launching and insuring the Telstar 18/ Apstar V satellite, which purchase price will be adjusted if the actual project cost is greater or less than $230.2 million. In addition, Loral Orion has agreed to bear the cost of modifying the footprint of one of the Ku-band beams on the satellite. Telstar 18/ Apstar V will have a total of 54 transponders, comprised of 24 standard C-band transponders, 14 extended C-band transponders and 16 Ku-band transponders. Under this transaction, Loral Orion has agreed to purchase 12 standard C-band, 7 extended C-band and 8 Ku-band transponders on Telstar 18/ Apstar V, which capacity will be designated Telstar 18. Loral Orion will also have the option to enter into similar arrangements with APT on replacement satellites upon the end of life of Telstar 18/ Apstar V. To be located at 138 degrees East Longitude, Telstar 18/ Apstar V is currently scheduled to be launched in the third quarter of 2003 and will be capable of providing Ku-band voice, video and data services to China, India and East Asia, and broadbeam C-band services throughout the Asia-Pacific region, including Australia and Hawaii. To ensure a timely launch of Telstar 18/ Apstar V, Loral Orion, APT and SS/ L have agreed that a non-Chinese launch provider will be used.

      Pursuant to Loral Orion’s agreement with APT, Loral Orion will pay one-half the purchase price prior to launch for 13.5 transponders on the satellite. The corresponding cumulative costs relating to these transponders have been reflected as satellites under construction on Loral Orion’s condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2002. Subject to certain acceleration rights on the part of Loral Orion, the remainder of the purchase price for the second 13.5 transponders will be paid by Loral Orion as follows: on the second anniversary of the satellite’s in-service date, $10.66 million for 2.5 additional transponders; on the third anniversary of the satellite’s in-service date, $12.79 million for three additional transponders; and on each of the fourth and fifth anniversaries of the satellite’s in-service date, $17.05 million for four additional transponders. Title to these transponders will pass to Loral Orion upon its payments thereon. As a result of finalizing the Telstar 18/ Apstar V launch arrangements in March 2003, the Company agreed to take two fewer transponders without any corresponding change to the transponder cost borne by each of the parties. Loral SpaceCom has agreed to purchase from Loral Orion 4.75 transponders on Telstar 18/Apstar V, together with a lease of an additional transponder for an approximate two year period from the Telstar 18/Apstar V in-service date.

      The Company, like others in the satellite industry, are faced with significantly higher premiums on launch and in-orbit insurance, increasing thresholds in determining total losses for satellites in orbit and significantly shorter coverage periods than those that have been available in the past, which was due in part to the events of September 11, 2001. This development in the insurance industry has increased our cost of doing business. The Company intends to pass on some of the increased cost to our customers. There can be no assurance, however, that the Company will be able to do so. Insurance market conditions have historically been cyclical in nature. While the Company anticipates that these conditions will improve in the future, there can be no assurance that they will.

      Beginning in 2002, Loral initiated the allocation of corporate management expenses to its individual subsidiaries and divisions, including $3.1 million to Loral Orion. The allocation of these expenses is computed with respect to Loral Orion in a manner consistent with Loral’s other subsidiaries and divisions, using a fixed formula based on three factors: employee payroll, revenues and assets.

      On December 21, 2001, Loral Orion completed exchange offers by issuing $613 million principal amount of new senior notes due 2006 guaranteed by Loral, in exchange for the extinguishment of $841 million principal amount of Loral Orion senior notes due in 2007 and senior discount notes due 2007 as discussed

13

Table of Contents

      The interest rate on the senior notes is 10%, a reduction from the 11.25% interest rate on the existing senior notes and the 12.5% rate on the existing senior discount notes. Interest is payable semi-annually on July 15 and January 15, beginning July 15, 2002. As a result of the lower interest rate and the $229 million reduction in principal amount of debt, Loral Orion’s annual cash interest payments will be reduced by approximately $39 million. Under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States dealing with debt restructurings, the Company recorded a gain of $34.5 million on the exchange, after expenses of $5 million. The carrying value of the 10% senior notes on the balance sheet is $858 million, although the actual principal amount of the 10% senior notes is $613 million. The difference between this carrying value and the actual principal amount of the 10% senior notes is being amortized over the life of the 10% senior notes, fully offsetting interest expense through maturity of the 10% senior notes. The indenture relating to the 10% senior notes contains limitations on Loral Orion and its subsidiaries, including, without limitation, restrictions on Loral Orion’s ability to pay dividends or make loans to Loral.

      In connection with the completion of the Company’s debt exchange offers in December 2001, LSC canceled its $79.7 million intercompany note issued to it by Loral Orion which ranked pari passu to the senior debt in exchange for the transfer of Loral Orion’s data services business (see Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements) and the issuance of a new note to LSC in the principal amount of $29.7 million due 2006, having an interest rate of 10% per annum payable in kind, subordinated to Loral Orion’s new 10% senior notes. Loral Orion’s data services business was transferred to a newly-formed subsidiary of Loral, which assumed the name Loral Cyberstar, Inc. As of December 31, 2002, the balance of the note was $31.5 million, including accrued interest.

      On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“SFAS 142”), which addresses the initial recognition and measurement of intangible assets acquired outside of a business combination and the accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets subsequent to their acquisition. SFAS 142 provides that intangible assets with finite useful lives be amortized and that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives not be amortized, but rather be tested at least annually for impairment. SFAS 142 also changed the evaluation criteria for testing goodwill for impairment from an undiscounted cash flow approach, which was previously utilized under the guidance in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 17, Intangible Assets, to a test based on fair value. Fair value is determined by the amount at which an asset or liability could be bought or sold in a current transaction between willing parties, that is, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. Quoted market prices in active markets are the best evidence of fair value and must be used as the basis for the measurement, if available. If quoted market prices are not available, the estimate of fair value must be based on the best information available, including prices for similar assets and liabilities and the results of using other valuation techniques, such as public company trading multiples and future discounted cash flows.

      In accordance with SFAS 142, the Company’s previously recognized cost in excess of net assets acquired (“goodwill”) of $562 million (at December 31, 2001) from the acquisition of the Company by Loral in 1998 was reviewed under the new transitional guidance as of January 1, 2002. The Company hired professionals in the valuation consulting business to determine the fair value of the Company. Since there were no quoted market prices in active markets for the Company, the measurement of fair value was based on the best information available in the circumstances, including reasonable and supportable assumptions and projections,

14

Table of Contents

      The charge is the result of a change in the evaluation criteria for goodwill from an undiscounted cash flow approach which was previously utilized under the guidance in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 17 to the fair value approach which is stipulated in SFAS 142.

      The following table presents the actual financial results and as adjusted financial results without the amortization of goodwill for the Company for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 (in thousands):

      In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations (“SFAS 143”). SFAS 143 addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. It applies to legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development and the normal operation of a long-lived asset, except for certain obligations of lessees. The Company is required to adopt SFAS 143 on January 1, 2003. The Company believes that there will be no effect on its consolidated results of operations or its financial position upon the adoption of SFAS 143.

      In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (“SFAS 144”). SFAS 144 addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. It supersedes SFAS No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of, and the accounting and reporting provisions of APB 30, Reporting the Results of Operations — Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions, for the disposal of a segment of a business. The Company has determined that there was no effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations relating to the adoption of SFAS 144 on January 1, 2002.

      In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, Rescission of FASB Statement No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections. SFAS 145 generally requires that any gains or losses on extinguishment of debt in current or prior periods be classified as other income (expense), beginning in fiscal 2003, with early adoption encouraged. In the fourth quarter of 2002, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 145 and reclassified the previously recorded extraordinary gain on its exchanges in 2001 to gain on debt exchanges in its consolidated statement of operations (see Exchange Offers).

      In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (“SFAS 146”). SFAS 146 requires companies to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal activities when they are incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan. Examples

15

Table of Contents

      In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 45 (“FIN 45”),Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees and Indebtedness of Others. FIN 45 elaborates on the disclosures to be made by the guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued. It also requires that a guarantor recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. The initial recognition and measurement provisions of this interpretation are applicable on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002; while the provisions of the disclosure requirements are effective for financial statements of interim or annual reports ending after December 15, 2002. The Company adopted the disclosure provisions of FIN 45 during the fourth quarter of 2002. The Company is currently evaluating the recognition provisions of FIN 45.

      As of December 31, 2002, all of the Company’s outstanding debt had fixed interest rates.

      As of December 31, 2002, the carrying value of the Company’s long-term debt was $960 million and the fair value of such debt was $273 million. The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt is primarily based on quoted market prices. Approximately $245 million of the difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of the Company’s long-term debt as of December 31, 2002 is attributable to the accounting for the Company’s exchange offers completed in 2001. The table below provides information about the carrying amount of the Company’s long-term debt obligations by fiscal year of maturity (in thousands).

16

Table of Contents

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT

To the Stockholder of Loral Orion, Inc.:

      We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Loral Orion, Inc. (formerly Loral CyberStar, Inc.) and its subsidiaries a wholly owned subsidiary of Loral Space & Communications Corporation, as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholder’s (deficit) equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

      We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

      In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Loral Orion, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002, and 2001, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

      As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets to adopt the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, effective January 1, 2002. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, effective December 31, 2002, the Company changed its method of accounting for gains on extinguishment of debt to adopt the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 145, Rescission of FASB Statement No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

17

Table of Contents

LORAL ORION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

See notes to consolidated financial statements

18

Table of Contents

LORAL ORION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

See notes to consolidated financial statements

19

Table of Contents

LORAL ORION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDER’S (DEFICIT) EQUITY

See notes to consolidated financial statements

20

Table of Contents

LORAL ORION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

See notes to consolidated financial statements

21

Table of Contents

LORAL ORION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

      The principal business of Loral Orion, Inc. (the “Company” or “Loral Orion”), is providing fixed satellite services, including video distribution and other satellite transmission services by leasing transponder capacity on its satellites to its customers for various applications, including broadcasting, news gathering, Internet access and transmission, private voice and data networks, business television, distance learning and direct-to-home television (“DTH”). Loral Skynet, a division of Loral SpaceCom Corporation, which is a subsidiary of Loral Space & Communications Corporation, which is in turn a subsidiary of Loral Space & Communications Ltd. (“Loral”), manages the Company’s business. The Company operates in one business segment, Fixed Satellite Services (“FSS”). On December 21, 2001, the Company, in connection with an exchange offer for its outstanding senior notes and senior discount notes (notes 5 and 9), transferred its data services business to a subsidiary of Loral.

      The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Loral Orion and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated.

     Risks and Uncertainties

      The Company had total long-term debt of $960 million, including current portion of $65 million, outstanding at December 31, 2002, most of which matures in 2006. In addition to its debt service requirements, the Company’s business is capital intensive and requires substantial investment. Much of this investment has already been incurred primarily to launch the Company’s three satellites. At December 31, 2002, the Company had incurred costs of approximately $18 million (of which it has paid $3 million) related to the construction of Telstar 18/Apstar V which it intends to launch in 2003. The Company will need to incur approximately $11 million of additional costs to complete the construction, launch and insure Telstar 18/Apstar V and an additional $58 million to acquire additional transponders in the future on Telstar 18/Apstar V over the second through fifth anniversaries of the launch.

      At December 31, 2002 the Company had a retained deficit of $1 billion and stockholder’s deficit of $399 million. The Company has generated (used) cash from operating activities of $90 million, $24 million and $(48) million for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The Company believes its cash and net cash provided by operating activities will be adequate to meet its expected cash requirements through at least December 31, 2003. If the Company does not generate sufficient cash to satisfy its debt service and operating requirements, the Company may be required to seek alternative financing or postpone its planned satellite construction and launch plans. Current market conditions present uncertainty as to the ability of the Company to secure additional financing, if needed, and there can be no assurances as to the availability of additional financing or whether the terms of such financing, if it is available, would be acceptable to the Company. In addition, a delay in the Company’s planned satellite construction and launch plans could impact the Company’s ability to achieve profitability.

     Cash and Cash Equivalents

      Loral Orion considers all highly liquid investments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

22

Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

     Concentration of Credit Risk

      Financial instruments which potentially subject Loral Orion to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. The Company’s cash and cash equivalents are maintained with high-credit-quality financial institutions. The company does not require collateral against its receivables; however, management believes that its credit evaluation, approval and monitoring processes combined with negotiated billing arrangements mitigate potential credit risks with regard to the Company’s current customer base.

      As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, accounts receivable was reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts of $1.0 million and $1.3 million, respectively.

     Satellites and Related Equipment

      Satellites and related equipment consist of the following (in thousands):

      Satellites and related equipment is recorded at cost. Depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 was $73.3 million, $76.2 million, and $71.4 million, respectively. Accumulated depreciation and amortization at December 31, 2002 and 2001 includes $68.5 million and $47.5 million, respectively, related to the Company’s rights to transponders for the remaining life of Telstar 10/ Apstar IIR. Depreciation expense is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated original useful lives of 10.5 to 16.5 years.

      Costs incurred in connection with the construction and successful deployment of satellites and related equipment are capitalized. Such costs include direct contract costs, allocated indirect costs, launch costs, launch insurance, construction period interest and the present value of satellite incentive payments. Loral Orion began depreciating the Telstar 11 and Telstar 12 satellites over their estimated useful life commencing on the date of operational delivery in orbit, January 1995 and December 1999, respectively. Satellite lives are re-evaluated periodically.

      In September, 1999, Loral Orion purchased from APT Satellite Company Limited (“APT”) for approximately $273 million, the rights to all transponder capacity and existing customer leases on the Apstar IIR satellite (except for one C-band transponder retained by APT), and renamed the satellite the Telstar 10/ Apstar IIR satellite. Loral Orion has full use of the transponders for the remaining life of Telstar 10/ Apstar IIR.

      On September 20, 2002, Loral Orion entered into an agreement with APT Satellite Company Limited (“APT”) pursuant to which Loral Orion will purchase a 50% interest in the Telstar 18/ Apstar V satellite, a satellite under construction by Space Systems/Loral (“SS/L”) for APT. Loral Orion’s aggregate purchase price for its 50% interest in the satellite is $115.1 million, representing 50% of the current estimated project

23

Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

cost of constructing, launching and insuring the Telstar 18/ Apstar V satellite, which purchase price will be adjusted if the actual project cost should be greater or less than $230.2 million. In addition, Loral Orion has agreed to bear the cost of modifying the footprint of one of the Ku-band beams on the satellite. Pursuant to Loral Orion’s agreement with APT, Loral Orion will pay one-half the purchase price prior to launch for 13.5 transponders on the satellite. The corresponding cumulative costs relating to these transponders have been reflected as satellites under construction on Loral Orion’s condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2002. Subject to certain acceleration rights on the part of Loral Orion, the remainder of the purchase price for the second 13.5 transponders will be paid by Loral Orion as follows: on the second anniversary of the satellite’s in-service date, $10.66 million for 2.5 additional transponders; on the third anniversary of the satellite’s in-service date, $12.79 million for three additional transponders; and on each of the fourth and fifth anniversaries of the satellite’s in-service date, $17.05 million for four additional transponders. Title to these transponders will pass to Loral Orion upon its payment thereon. As a result of finalizing the Telstar 18/ Apstar V launch arrangements in March 2003, Loral Orion agreed to take two fewer transponders without any corresponding change to the transponder cost borne by each of the parties. Loral SpaceCom has agreed to purchase from Loral Orion 4.75 transponders on Telstar 18/Apstar V, together with a lease of an additional transponder for an approximate two year period from the Telstar 18/Apstar V in-service date.

      Satellites in-orbit are either leased by customers or held for lease by the Company. Future minimum lease receipts due from customers under long-term operating leases for transponder capacity on satellites in-orbit as of December 31, 2002 are as follows (in thousands):

     Revenue Recognition

      The Company provides satellite capacity under lease agreements that generally provide for the use of satellite transponders and, in certain cases, earth stations for periods generally ranging from one year to the end of life of the satellite. Some of these agreements have certain obligations, including providing spare or substitute capacity, if available, in the event of satellite failure. If no spare or substitute capacity is available, the agreement may be terminated. Revenue under transponder lease agreements is recognized as services are performed, provided that a contract exists, the price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. Revenues under contracts that include fixed lease payment increases are recognized on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease.

24

Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

     Income Taxes

      The benefit (provision) for income taxes on the loss before income taxes and discontinued operations differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory U.S. Federal income tax rate because of the effect of the following items (in thousands):

      At December 31, 2002, the Company had approximately $419 million in net operating loss carryforwards which expire at varying dates from 2011 through 2022. The Company is included in the U.S. federal income tax return of its parent company, Loral Space & Communications Corporation. Pursuant to annual tax sharing agreements with its parent, the Company is entitled to reimbursement for the parent’s use of the Company’s net operating losses. The Company has been credited with cumulative reimbursements of $48.6 million through December 31, 2002.

      The Company assesses the recoverability of its loss carryforwards and other deferred tax assets and based upon this analysis, records a valuation allowance to the extent recoverability does not satisfy the “more likely than not” recognition criteria in SFAS No. 109. During the fourth quarter of 2002, management concluded that, due to insufficient positive evidence substantiating recoverability, the valuation allowance should be increased to a balance of $177.4 million, thereby fully reserving the Company’s deferred tax asset. During the current year, the valuation allowance was increased by $17.5 million, which was charged to the 2002 results, and decreased by $10.2 million, which was applied directly against the deferred tax asset. The valuation allowance was $170 million at December 31, 2001 and $175 million at December 31, 2000.

      The Company will maintain the valuation allowance until sufficient positive evidence exists to support the reversal of the reserve. When the Company determines that it will be able to realize its deferred tax asset, an adjustment to the valuation allowance will increase income in the period such determination is made.

      For the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company recorded a current income tax benefit of $16.3 million related to the tax sharing agreement, a current foreign tax provision of $0.2 million and a deferred tax provision (including valuation allowance) of $32.1 million, resulting in a net tax provision of $16.1 million.

      For the year ended December 31, 2001, the Company recorded a current income tax benefit of $8.9 million related to the tax sharing agreement and a deferred tax provision of $12.9 million, resulting in a net tax provision of $4.0 million. The tax provision for 2001 excluded a current tax benefit of $0.1 million under the tax sharing agreement and a current foreign tax provision of $1.1 million related to discontinued operations.

25

Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      For the year ended December 31, 2000, the Company recorded a current income tax benefit of $3.3 million related to the tax sharing agreement and a deferred tax provision of $4.2 million, resulting in a net tax provision of $0.9 million. The net tax provision for 2000 excluded a current foreign tax provision of $0.2 million related to discontinued operations.

      The Company recognizes deferred taxes for the expected future tax effect of temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial and income tax reporting using statutory tax rates in effect for the year during which the differences are expected to reverse.

      Following is a summary of the components of the net deferred income tax asset at December 31, 2002 and 2001 (in thousands):

     Use of Estimates

      The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and amounts of revenues and expenses reported for the period. Significant estimates include the estimated useful lives of the Company’s satellites and, prior to 2002, the amortization period of costs in excess of net assets acquired. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

      During the periods presented, comprehensive loss from continuing operations was the same as net loss. Cumulative translation losses attributable to discontinued operations were $0.4 million and $0.6 million in 2001 and 2000 respectively.

      In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations (“SFAS 143”). SFAS 143 addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. It applies to legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development and the normal operation of a long-lived asset, except for certain obligations of lessees. The Company is

26

Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

required to adopt SFAS 143 on January 1, 2003. The Company believes that there will be no effect on its consolidated results of operations or its financial position upon the adoption of SFAS 143.

      In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (“SFAS 144”). SFAS 144 addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. It supersedes SFAS No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of, and the accounting and reporting provisions of APB 30, Reporting the Results of Operations — Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions, for the disposal of a segment of a business. The Company has determined that there was no effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations relating to the adoption of SFAS 144 on January 1, 2002.

      In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, Rescission of FASB Statement No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections. SFAS 145 generally requires that any gains or losses on extinguishment of debt in current or prior periods be classified as other income (expense), beginning in fiscal 2003, with early adoption encouraged. In the fourth quarter of 2002, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 145 and reclassified the previously recorded extraordinary gain on its exchanges in 2001 to gain on debt exchanges in its consolidated statement of operations (see Exchange Offers).

          SFAS 146

      In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (“SFAS 146”). SFAS 146 requires companies to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal activities when they are incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan. Examples of costs covered by the standard include lease termination costs and certain employee severance costs that are associated with a restructuring, discontinued operation, plant closing, or other exit or disposal activity. Previous accounting guidance was provided by EITF Issue No. 94-3, Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring). SFAS 146 replaces EITF Issue No. 94-3. SFAS 146 is to be applied prospectively to exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002.

      In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 45 (“FIN 45”),Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees and Indebtedness of Others. FIN 45 elaborates on the disclosures to be made by the guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued. It also requires that a guarantor recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. The initial recognition and measurement provisions of this interpretation are applicable on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002; while the provisions of the disclosure requirements are effective for financial statements of interim or annual reports ending after December 15, 2002. The Company adopted the disclosure provisions of FIN 45 during the fourth quarter of 2002. The Company is currently evaluating the recognition provisions of FIN 45.

27

Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. In addition, the Company’s historical consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations and cash flows have been restated to account for the data services segment as a discontinued operation (see Note 9).

      In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations (“SFAS 141”) and SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“SFAS 142”). SFAS 141 requires that all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001, be accounted for under the purchase method and addresses the initial recognition and measurement of goodwill and other intangible assets acquired in a business combination. SFAS 142 addresses the initial recognition and measurement of intangible assets acquired outside of a business combination and the accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets subsequent to their acquisition. SFAS 142 provides that intangible assets with finite useful lives be amortized and that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives not be amortized, but will rather be tested at least annually for impairment. The Company will adopt SFAS 142 on January 1, 2002. Upon adoption of SFAS 142, the Company will stop the amortization of goodwill with a net carrying value of approximately $562 million at the date of adoption and annual amortization of approximately $16 million that resulted from business combinations completed prior to the adoption of SFAS 141. Based on management’s preliminary evaluation under the new transitional impairment test in SFAS 142, the Company expects to record a non-cash charge in the first quarter of 2002 to write-off a portion or all of its goodwill. Any transitional impairment loss will be recognized as a change in accounting principle.

      On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“SFAS 142”), which addresses the initial recognition and measurement of intangible assets acquired outside of a business combination and the accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets subsequent to their acquisition. SFAS 142 provides that intangible assets with finite useful lives be amortized and that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives not be amortized, but rather be tested at least annually for impairment. SFAS 142 also changed the evaluation criteria for testing goodwill for impairment from an undiscounted cash flow approach, which was previously utilized under the guidance in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 17, Intangible Assets, to a test based on fair value. Fair value is determined by the amount at which an asset or liability could be bought or sold in a current transaction between willing parties, that is, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. Quoted market prices in active markets are the best evidence of fair value and must be used as the basis for the measurement, if available. If quoted market prices are not available, the estimate of fair value must be based on the best information available, including prices for similar assets and liabilities and the results of using other valuation techniques, such as public company trading multiples and future discounted cash flows.

Goodwill

      In accordance with SFAS 142, the Company’s previously recognized cost in excess of net assets acquired (“goodwill”) of $562 million (at December 31, 2001) from the acquisition of the Company by Loral in 1998 was reviewed under the new transitional guidance as of January 1, 2002. The Company hired professionals in the valuation consulting business to determine the fair value of the Company.

      Since there were no quoted market prices in active markets for the Company, the measurement of fair value was based on the best information available in the circumstances, including reasonable and supportable assumptions and projections, to determine that the most appropriate method of fair value was public company

28

Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

trading multiples. Based on the fair values concluded on by those professionals, management determined that the Company’s goodwill under the new guidance in SFAS 142 was fully impaired. Accordingly, as of January 1, 2002, the Company recorded a non-cash charge for the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle of $562 million.

      The charge is the result of a change in the evaluation criteria for goodwill from an undiscounted cash flow approach which was previously utilized under the guidance in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 17 to the fair value approach which is stipulated in SFAS 142.

      The following table presents the actual financial results and as adjusted financial results without the amortization of goodwill for the Company for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 (in thousands):