Back to GetFilings.com
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
[ X ] Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 28, 2002
or
[ ] Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (No Fee Required)
For the transition period from ________ to ________
Commission file number 333-80361-01
BOTTLING GROUP, LLC
(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
ORGANIZED IN DELAWARE 13-4042452
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF (I.R.S. EMPLOYER
INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION) IDENTIFICATION NO.)
ONE PEPSI WAY
SOMERS, NEW YORK 10589
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (914) 767-6000
-------------------------
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT: NONE
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT: NONE
INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT: (1) HAS FILED ALL REPORTS
REQUIRED TO BE FILED BY SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 DURING THE PRECEDING 12 MONTHS (OR FOR SUCH SHORTER PERIOD THAT THE
REGISTRANT WAS REQUIRED TO FILE SUCH REPORTS) AND (2) HAS BEEN SUBJECT TO SUCH
FILING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PAST 90 DAYS. YES [ X ] NO [ ]
INDICATE BY CHECK MARK IF DISCLOSURE OF DELINQUENT FILERS PURSUANT TO ITEM
405 OF REGULATION S-K IS NOT CONTAINED HEREIN, AND WILL NOT BE CONTAINED, TO THE
BEST OF REGISTRANT'S KNOWLEDGE, IN DEFINITIVE PROXY OR INFORMATION STATEMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE IN PART III OF THIS FORM 10-K OR ANY AMENDMENT TO THIS
FORM 10-K. [ X ]
INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER REGISTRANT IS AN ACCELERATED FILER (As
Defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). YES [ ] NO [ X ]
THE AGGREGATE MARKET VALUE OF BOTTLING GROUP, LLC VOTING AND NON-VOTING
COMMON EQUITY HELD BY NON-AFFILIATES OF BOTTLING GROUP, LLC AS OF JUNE 15, 2002
WAS $0.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
INTRODUCTION
Bottling Group, LLC ("Bottling LLC") is the principal operating subsidiary
of The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc. ("PBG") and consists of substantially all of
the operations and assets of PBG. Bottling LLC, which is fully consolidated by
PBG, consists of bottling operations located in the United States, Canada,
Spain, Greece, Russia, Turkey and Mexico. Prior to its formation, Bottling LLC
was an operating unit of PepsiCo, Inc. ("PepsiCo"). When used in this Report,
"Bottling LLC," "we," "us" and "our" each refers to Bottling Group, LLC and,
where appropriate, its subsidiaries.
PBG was incorporated in Delaware in January, 1999, as a wholly owned
subsidiary of PepsiCo to effect the separation of most of PepsiCo's
company-owned bottling businesses. PBG became a publicly traded company on March
31, 1999. As of February 21, 2003, PepsiCo's ownership represented 38.0% of the
outstanding common stock and 100% of the outstanding Class B common stock,
together representing 43.1% of the voting power of all classes of PBG's voting
stock.
PepsiCo and PBG contributed bottling businesses and assets used in the
bottling business to Bottling LLC in connection with the formation of Bottling
LLC. As a result of the contributions of assets, PBG owns 93.2% and PepsiCo owns
the remaining 6.8%.
RECENT ACQUISITIONS
On March 13, 2002, we acquired the operations and exclusive right to
manufacture, sell and distribute Pepsi-Cola's international beverages in Turkey
for a purchase price of approximately $75 million in cash and assumed debt.
On November 5, 2002, we acquired approximately 99.8% of all of the
outstanding capital stock of Pepsi-Gemex, S.A. de C.V. ("Gemex"), which is the
largest bottler in Mexico and the largest bottler outside the United States of
Pepsi-Cola soft drink products based on sales volume, through simultaneous
tender offers in Mexico and the United States. Following the offers, we funded a
trust for the acquisition of the balance of the outstanding capital stock and
caused Gemex to carry out a reverse stock split that eliminated for cash the
outstanding capital stock held by any remaining security holders other than us.
Our total cost for the purchase of Gemex was a net cash payment of $871 million
and assumed debt of approximately $305 million.
PRINCIPAL PRODUCTS
We are the world's largest manufacturer, seller and distributor of
Pepsi-Cola beverages. The beverages sold by us include PEPSI-COLA, MOUNTAIN DEW,
DIET PEPSI, AQUAFINA, LIPTON BRISK, MOUNTAIN DEW CODE RED, SIERRA MIST, SOBE,
DOLE, MUG, DIET MOUNTAIN DEW, PEPSI TWIST, STARBUCKS FRAPPUCCINO and, outside
the U.S., PEPSI-COLA, MIRINDA, 7 UP, KAS, ELECTROPURA, AQUA MINERALE,MANZANITA
SOL, SQUIRT, GARCI CRESPO, FIESTA, PEPSI LIGHT, IVI, YEDIGUN, and FRUKO.
We have the exclusive right to manufacture, sell and distribute Pepsi-Cola
beverages in all or a portion of 41 states and the District of Columbia in the
U.S., nine Canadian provinces, Spain, Greece, Russia, Turkey and, after our
recent acquisition of Gemex, all or a portion of 21 states in Mexico. In some of
our U.S. territories, we also have the right to manufacture, sell and distribute
soft drink products of other companies, including DR PEPPER, ALL SPORT and,
through December 2002, 7 UP. In 2002, approximately 82% of our net revenues were
generated in the United States, and the remaining 18% was generated in Canada,
Spain, Greece, Russia, Turkey and Mexico. We have an extensive direct store
distribution system in the United States, Mexico and Canada. In Russia, Spain,
Greece and Turkey, we
2
use a combination of direct store distribution and distribution through
wholesalers, depending on local marketplace considerations.
RAW MATERIALS AND OTHER SUPPLIES
We purchase the concentrates to manufacture Pepsi-Cola beverages and other
soft drink products from PepsiCo and other soft-drink companies.
In addition to concentrates, we purchase sweeteners, glass and plastic
bottles, cans, closures, syrup containers, other packaging materials and carbon
dioxide. We generally purchase our raw materials, other than concentrates, from
multiple suppliers. PepsiCo acts as our agent for the purchase of such raw
materials in the United States and Canada and, with respect to some of our raw
materials, in certain of our international markets. The Pepsi beverage
agreements provide that, with respect to the soft drink products of PepsiCo, all
authorized containers, closures, cases, cartons and other packages and labels
may be purchased only from manufacturers approved by PepsiCo. There are no
materials or supplies used by us that are currently in short supply. The supply
or cost of specific materials could be adversely affected by various factors,
including price changes, strikes, weather conditions and governmental controls.
PATENTS, TRADEMARKS, LICENSES AND FRANCHISES
Our portfolio of beverage products includes some of the best recognized
trademarks in the world and includes PEPSI-COLA, MOUNTAIN DEW, DIET PEPSI,
AQUAFINA, LIPTON BRISK, MOUNTAIN DEW CODE RED, SIERRA MIST, SOBE, DOLE, MUG,
DIET MOUNTAIN DEW, PEPSI TWIST, STARBUCKS FRAPPUCCINO and, outside the U.S.,
PEPSI-COLA, MIRINDA, 7 UP, KAS, ELECTROPURA, AQUA MINERALE, MANZANITA SOL,
SQUIRT, GARCI CRESPO, FIESTA, PEPSI LIGHT, IVI, YEDIGUN, and FRUKO. The
majority of our volume is derived from brands licensed from PepsiCo or PepsiCo
joint ventures. In some of our U.S. territories, we also have the right to
manufacture, sell and distribute soft drink products of othercompanies,
including DR PEPPER, ALL SPORT and, through December 2002, 7 UP.
We conduct our business primarily pursuant to PBG's beverage agreements
with PepsiCo. Although Bottling LLC is not a direct party to these agreements,
as the principal operating subsidiary of PBG, it enjoys certain rights and is
subject to certain obligations as described below. These agreements give us the
exclusive right to market, distribute, and produce beverage products of PepsiCo
in authorized containers in specified territories.
Set forth below is a description of the Pepsi beverage agreements and
other bottling agreements from which we benefit and under which we are obligated
as the principal operating subsidiary of PBG.
Terms of the Master Bottling Agreement. The Master Bottling Agreement
under which we manufacture, package, sell and distribute the cola beverages
bearing the PEPSI-COLA and PEPSI Trademarks in the U.S. was entered into in
March of 1999. The Master Bottling Agreement gives us the exclusive and
perpetual right to distribute cola beverages for sale in specified territories
in authorized containers of the nature currently used by us. The Master Bottling
Agreement provides that we will purchase our entire requirements of concentrates
for the cola beverages from PepsiCo at prices, and on terms and conditions,
determined from time to time by PepsiCo. PepsiCo may determine from time to time
what types of containers to authorize for use by us. PepsiCo has no rights under
the Master Bottling Agreement with respect to the prices at which we sell our
products.
Under the Master Bottling Agreement we are obligated to:
(1) maintain such plant and equipment, staff, and distribution and
vending facilities that are capable of manufacturing, packaging and
distributing the cola beverages in sufficient quantities to fully
meet the demand for these beverages in our territories;
3
(2) undertake adequate quality control measures prescribed by PepsiCo;
(3) push vigorously the sale of the cola beverages in our territories;
(4) increase and fully meet the demand for the cola beverages in our
territories;
(5) use all approved means and spend such funds on advertising and other
forms of marketing beverages as may be reasonably required to meet
the objective; and
(6) maintain such financial capacity as may be reasonably necessary to
assure performance under the Master Bottling Agreement by us.
The Master Bottling Agreement requires us to meet annually with PepsiCo to
discuss plans for the ensuing year and the following two years. At such
meetings, we are obligated to present plans that set out in reasonable detail
our marketing plan, our management plan and advertising plan with respect to the
cola beverages for the year. We must also present a financial plan showing that
we have the financial capacity to perform our duties and obligations under the
Master Bottling Agreement for that year, as well as sales, marketing,
advertising and capital expenditure plans for the two years following such year.
PepsiCo has the right to approve such plans, which approval shall not be
unreasonably withheld. In 2002, PepsiCo approved our annual plan.
If we carry out our annual plan in all material respects, we will be
deemed to have satisfied our obligations to push vigorously the sale of the cola
beverages, increase and fully meet the demand for the cola beverages in our
territories and maintain the financial capacity required under the Master
Bottling Agreement. Failure to present a plan or carry out approved plans in all
material respects would constitute an event of default that, if not cured within
120 days of notice of the failure, would give PepsiCo the right to terminate the
Master Bottling Agreement.
If we present a plan that PepsiCo does not approve, such failure shall
constitute a primary consideration for determining whether we have satisfied our
obligations to maintain our financial capacity, push vigorously the sale of the
cola beverages and increase and fully meet the demand for the cola beverages in
our territories.
If we fail to carry out our annual plan in all material respects in any
segment of our territory, whether defined geographically or by type of market or
outlet, and if such failure is not cured within six months of notice of the
failure, PepsiCo may reduce the territory covered by the Master Bottling
Agreement by eliminating the territory, market or outlet with respect to which
such failure has occurred.
PepsiCo has no obligation to participate with us in advertising and
marketing spending, but it may contribute to such expenditures and undertake
independent advertising and marketing activities, as well as cooperative
advertising and sales promotion programs that would require our cooperation and
support. Although PepsiCo has advised us that it intends to continue to provide
cooperative advertising funds, it is not obligated to do so under the Master
Bottling Agreement.
The Master Bottling Agreement provides that PepsiCo may in its sole
discretion reformulate any of the cola beverages or discontinue them, with some
limitations, so long as all cola beverages are not discontinued. PepsiCo may
also introduce new beverages under the PEPSI-COLA trademarks or any modification
thereof. When that occurs, we are obligated to manufacture, package, distribute
and sell such new beverages with the same obligations as then exist with respect
to other cola beverages. We are prohibited from producing or handling cola
products, other than those of PepsiCo, or products or packages that imitate,
infringe or cause confusion with the products, containers or trademarks of
PepsiCo. The Master Bottling Agreement also imposes requirements with respect to
the use of PepsiCo's trademarks, authorized containers, packaging and labeling.
4
If we acquire control, directly or indirectly, of any bottler of cola
beverages, we must cause the acquired bottler to amend its bottling appointments
for the cola beverages to conform to the terms of the Master Bottling Agreement.
Under the Master Bottling Agreement, PepsiCo has agreed not to withhold
approval for any acquisition of rights to manufacture and sell PEPSI trademarked
cola beverages within a specific area -- currently representing approximately
12.6% of PepsiCo's U.S. bottling system in terms of volume -- if we have
successfully negotiated the acquisition and, in PepsiCo's reasonable judgment,
satisfactorily performed our obligations under the Master Bottling Agreement. We
have agreed not to acquire or attempt to acquire any rights to manufacture and
sell PEPSI trademarked cola beverages outside of that specific area without
PepsiCo's prior written approval.
The Master Bottling Agreement is perpetual, but may be terminated by
PepsiCo in the event of our default. Events of default include:
(1) PBG's insolvency, bankruptcy, dissolution, receivership or the like;
(2) any disposition of any voting securities of one of our bottling
subsidiaries or substantially all of our bottling assets without the
consent of PepsiCo;
(3) PBG's entry into any business other than the business of
manufacturing, selling or distributing non-alcoholic beverages or
any business which is directly related and incidental to such
beverage business; and
(4) any material breach under the contract that remains uncured for 120
days after notice by PepsiCo.
An event of default will also occur if any person or affiliated group
acquires any contract, option, conversion privilege, or other right to acquire,
directly or indirectly, beneficial ownership of more than 15% of any class or
series of PBG's voting securities without the consent of PepsiCo. As of February
21, 2003, to our knowledge, no shareholder of PBG, other than PepsiCo, held more
than 6.0% of PBG's Common Stock.
PBG is prohibited from assigning, transferring or pledging the Master
Bottling Agreement, or any interest therein, whether voluntarily, or by
operation of law, including by merger or liquidation, without the prior consent
of PepsiCo.
The Master Bottling Agreement was entered into by PBG in the context of
its separation from PepsiCo and, therefore, its provisions were not the result
of arm's-length negotiations. Consequently, the agreement contains provisions
that are less favorable to us than the exclusive bottling appointments for cola
beverages currently in effect for independent bottlers in the United States.
Terms of the Non-Cola Bottling Agreements. The beverage products covered
by the non-cola bottling agreements are beverages licensed to PBG by PepsiCo,
consisting of MOUNTAIN DEW, DIET MOUNTAIN DEW, MOUNTAIN DEW CODE RED, SLICE,
SIERRA MIST, FRUITWORKS, MUG root beer and cream soda. The non-cola bottling
agreements contain provisions that are similar to those contained in the Master
Bottling Agreement with respect to pricing, territorial restrictions, authorized
containers, planning, quality control, transfer restrictions, term, and related
matters. PBG's non-cola bottling agreements will terminate if PepsiCo terminates
PBG's Master Bottling Agreement. The exclusivity provisions contained in the
non-cola bottling agreements would prevent us from manufacturing, selling or
distributing beverage products which imitate, infringe upon, or cause confusion
with, the beverage products covered by the non-cola bottling agreements. PepsiCo
may also elect to discontinue the manufacture, sale or distribution of a
non-cola beverage and terminate the applicable non-cola bottling agreement upon
six months notice to us.
5
Terms of Certain Distribution Agreements. PBG also has agreements with
PepsiCo granting PBG exclusive rights to distribute AQUAFINA, AMP and DOLE in
all of PBG's territories and SOBE in certain specified territories. PBG has the
right to manufacture AQUAFINA in certain locations depending on the availability
of appropriate equipment. The distribution agreements contain provisions
generally similar to those in the Master Bottling Agreement as to use of
trademarks, trade names, approved containers and labels and causes for
termination. PBG recently obtained the rights to sell and distribute GATORADE in
Spain, Greece and Russia and in certain limited channels of distribution in the
U.S. Some of these beverage agreements have limited terms and, in most
instances, prohibit us from dealing in similar beverage products.
Terms of the Master Syrup Agreement. The Master Syrup Agreement grants PBG
the exclusive right to manufacture, sell and distribute fountain syrup to local
customers in PBG territories. The Master Syrup Agreement also grants PBG the
right to act as a manufacturing and delivery agent for national accounts within
PBG territories that specifically request direct delivery without using a
middleman. In addition, PepsiCo may appoint PBG to manufacture and deliver
fountain syrup to national accounts that elect delivery through independent
distributors. Under the Master Syrup Agreement, PBG will have the exclusive
right to service fountain equipment for all of the national account customers
within PBG's territories. The Master Syrup Agreement provides that the
determination of whether an account is local or national is at the sole
discretion of PepsiCo.
The Master Syrup Agreement contains provisions that are similar to those
contained in the Master Bottling Agreement with respect to pricing, territorial
restrictions with respect to local customers and national customers electing
direct-to-store delivery only, planning, quality control, transfer restrictions
and related matters. The Master Syrup Agreement has an initial term of five
years and is automatically renewable for additional five-year periods unless
PepsiCo terminates it for cause. PepsiCo has the right to terminate the Master
Syrup Agreement without cause at the conclusion of the initial five-year period
or at any time during a renewal term upon twenty-four months notice. In the
event PepsiCo terminates the Master Syrup Agreement without cause, PepsiCo is
required to pay us the fair market value of PBG's rights thereunder.
PBG's Master Syrup Agreement will terminate if PepsiCo terminates PBG's
Master Bottling Agreement.
Terms of Other U.S. Bottling Agreements. The bottling agreements between
PBG and other licensors of beverage products, including Cadbury Schweppes plc
for DR PEPPER, SCHWEPPES, CANADA DRY AND HAWAIIAN PUNCH, the Pepsi/Lipton Tea
Partnership for LIPTON BRISK and LIPTON'S ICED TEA, the North American Coffee
Partnership for STARBUCKS FRAPPUCCINO, and The Monarch Beverage Company, Inc.
for ALL SPORT, contain provisions generally similar to those in the Master
Bottling Agreement as to use of trademarks, trade names, approved containers and
labels, sales of imitations, and causes for termination. Some of these beverage
agreements have limited terms and, in most instances, prohibit us from dealing
in similar beverage products.
Terms of the Country Specific Bottling Agreements. The country specific
bottling agreements contain provisions similar to those contained in the Master
Bottling Agreement and the non-cola bottling agreements and, in Canada, the
Master Syrup Agreement with respect to authorized containers, planning, quality
control, transfer restrictions, term, causes for termination and related
matters. These bottling agreements differ from the Master Bottling Agreement
because, except for Canada, they include both fountain syrup and non-fountain
beverages. Certain of these bottling agreements contain provisions that have
been modified to reflect the laws and regulations of the applicable country. For
example, the bottling agreements in Spain do not contain a restriction on the
sale and shipment of Pepsi-Cola beverages into our territory by others in
response to unsolicited orders.
6
SEASONALITY
Our peak season is the warm summer months beginning with Memorial Day and
ending with Labor Day. Approximately 73% of our operating income is typically
earned during the second and third quarters. Approximately 75% of cash flow from
operations is typically generated in the third and fourth quarters.
COMPETITION
The carbonated soft drink market and the non-carbonated beverage market
are highly competitive. Our competitors in these markets include bottlers and
distributors of nationally advertised and marketed products, bottlers and
distributors of regionally advertised and marketed products, as well as bottlers
of private label soft drinks sold in chain stores. Among our major competitors
are bottlers that distribute products from The Coca-Cola Company including
Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc., Coca-Cola Hellenic Bottling Company S.A. and
Coca-Cola FEMSA S.A. de C.V. The market shares for our U.S. territories range
from approximately 11.0% to approximately 53.0% and for our non-U.S. territories
from approximately 13.0% to approximately 40.0%. Actions by our major
competitors and others in the beverage industry, as well as the general economic
environment could have an impact on our future market share.
We compete primarily on the basis of advertising and marketing programs to
create brand awareness, price and promotions, retail space management, customer
service, consumer points of access, new products, packaging innovations and
distribution methods. We believe that brand recognition, availability and
consumer and customer goodwill are primary factors affecting our competitive
position.
GOVERNMENTAL REGULATION APPLICABLE TO BOTTLING LLC
Our operations and properties are subject to regulation by various
federal, state and local governmental entities and agencies in the United States
as well as foreign government entities and agencies in Canada, Spain, Greece,
Russia, Turkey and Mexico. As a producer of food products, we are subject to
production, packaging, quality, labeling and distribution standards in each of
the countries where we have operations, including, in the United States, those
of the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. The operations of our production and
distribution facilities are subject to laws and regulations relating to the
protection of the environment in the countries in which we do business. In the
United States, we are subject to the laws and regulations of the Department of
Transportation, and various federal, state and local occupational and
environmental laws. These laws and regulations include the Occupational Safety
and Health Act, the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act and laws relating to the operation, maintenance of
and financial responsibility for fuel storage tanks.
We believe that our current legal, operational and environmental
compliance programs are adequate and that we are in substantial compliance with
applicable laws and regulations of the countries in which we do business. We do
not anticipate making any material expenditures in connection with environmental
remediation and compliance. However, compliance with, or any violation of,
future laws or regulations could require material expenditures by us or
otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
Bottle and Can Legislation
In all but a few of our United States and Canadian markets, we offer our
bottle and can beverage products in non-refillable containers. Legislation has
been enacted in certain states and Canadian provinces where we operate that
generally prohibits the sale of certain beverages unless a deposit or levy is
charged for the container. These include Connecticut, Delaware, Maine,
Massachusetts, Michigan, New York, Oregon, California, British Columbia,
Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward
Island and Quebec.
7
Massachusetts and Michigan have statutes that require us to pay all or a
portion of unclaimed container deposits to the state and California imposes a
levy on beverage containers to fund a waste recovery system.
In addition to the Canadian deposit legislation described above, Ontario,
Canada, currently has a regulation requiring that 30% of all soft drinks sold in
Ontario be bottled in refillable containers. This regulation is currently being
reviewed by the Ontario Ministry of the Environment.
The European Commission issued a packaging and packing waste directive
that was incorporated into the national legislation of most member states. This
has resulted in targets being set for the recovery and recycling of household,
commercial and industrial packaging waste and imposes substantial
responsibilities upon bottlers and retailers for implementation.
We are not aware of similar material legislation being proposed or enacted
in any other areas served by us. We are unable to predict, however, whether such
legislation will be enacted or what impact its enactment would have on our
business, financial condition or results of operations.
Soft Drink Excise Tax Legislation
Specific soft drink excise taxes have been in place in certain states for
several years. The states in which we operate that currently impose such a tax
are West Virginia, Arkansas and Tennessee and, with respect to fountain syrup
only, Washington. In Mexico, there is an excise tax on mineral water and,
effective January 1, 2003, there is an excise tax applicable to any products
produced without sugar, including diet soft drinks.
Value-added taxes on soft drinks vary in our territories located in
Canada, Spain, Greece, Russia, Turkey and Mexico, but are consistent with the
value-added tax rate for other consumer products. In addition, there is a
special consumption tax applicable to cola products in Turkey.
We are not aware of any material soft drink taxes that have been enacted
in any other market served by us. We are unable to predict, however, whether
such legislation will be enacted or what impact its enactment would have on our
business, financial condition or results of operations.
Trade Regulation
As a manufacturer, seller and distributor of bottled and canned soft drink
products of PepsiCo and other soft drink manufacturers in exclusive territories
in the United States and internationally, we are subject to antitrust and
competition laws. Under the Soft Drink Interbrand Competition Act, soft drink
bottlers operating in the United States, such as us, may have an exclusive right
to manufacture, distribute and sell a soft drink product in a geographic
territory if the soft drink product is in substantial and effective competition
with other products of the same class in the same market or markets. We believe
that there is such substantial and effective competition in each of the
exclusive geographic territories in which we operate.
California Carcinogen and Reproductive Toxin Legislation
A California law requires that any person who exposes another to a
carcinogen or a reproductive toxin must provide a warning to that effect.
Because the law does not define quantitative thresholds below which a warning is
not required, virtually all manufacturers of food products are confronted with
the possibility of having to provide warnings due to the presence of trace
amounts of defined substances. Regulations implementing the law exempt
manufacturers from providing the required warning if it can be demonstrated that
the defined substances occur naturally in the product or are present in
municipal water used to manufacture the product. We have assessed the impact of
the law and its implementing regulations on our beverage products and have
concluded that none of our products currently require a warning under the law.
We cannot predict whether or to what extent food industry efforts to minimize
the
8
law's impact on food products will succeed. We also cannot predict what impact,
either in terms of direct costs or diminished sales, imposition of the law may
have.
Mexican Water Regulation
In Mexico, we purchase water directly from municipal water companies and
pump water from our own wells pursuant to concessions obtained from the Mexican
government on a plant-by-plant basis. The concessions are generally for 5, 10 or
15 year terms. Our concessions may be terminated if, among other things, (a) we
use more water than permitted, (b) we fail to pay required concession-related
fees, or (c) we fail to complete agreed-upon construction or improvements. Our
concessions satisfy our current water requirements and we believe that we are in
compliance in all material respects with the terms of our existing concessions.
EMPLOYEES
As of December 28, 2002, we employed approximately 65,000 full-time
workers, of whom approximately 29,500 were employed in the United States and
approximately 25,900 were employed in Mexico. Approximately 8,700 of our
full-time workers in the United States are union members and approximately
18,800 of our workers outside the United States are union members. We consider
relations with our employees to be good and have not experienced significant
interruptions of operations due to labor disagreements.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION ON INDUSTRY SEGMENTS AND GEOGRAPHIC AREAS
See Note 13 to Bottling LLC's Consolidated Financial Statements set forth
in Item 8 below.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
As of December 28, 2002, we operated 95 soft drink production facilities
worldwide, of which 89 were owned and six were leased. In addition, one facility
used for the manufacture of soft drink packaging materials was operated by a PBG
joint venture in Turkey. Of our 532 distribution facilities, 360 are owned and
172 are leased. We believe that our bottling, canning and syrup filling lines
and our distribution facilities are sufficient to meet present needs. We also
lease headquarters office space in Somers, New York.
We also own or lease and operate approximately 39,900 vehicles, including
delivery trucks, delivery and transport tractors and trailers and other trucks
and vans used in the sale and distribution of our soft drink products. We also
own more than 1.5 million soft drink dispensing and vending machines.
With a few exceptions, leases of plants in the United States and Canada
are on a long-term basis, expiring at various times, with options to renew for
additional periods. Most international plants are leased for varying and usually
shorter periods, with or without renewal options. We believe that our properties
are in good operating condition and are adequate to serve our current
operational needs.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time we are a party to various litigation matters incidental
to the conduct of our business. There is no pending or, to Bottling LLC's best
knowledge, threatened legal proceeding to which we are a party or that, in the
opinion of management, is likely to have a material adverse effect on our future
financial results.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SHAREHOLDERS
None.
9
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Set forth below, as of March 25, 2003, is information pertaining to the
executive officers of Bottling LLC:
JOHN T. CAHILL, 45, is the Principal Executive Officer of Bottling LLC. He is
also PBG's Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. He has been PBG's
Chief Executive Officer since September 2001. Previously, Mr. Cahill served as
PBG's President and Chief Operating Officer from August 2000 to September 2001.
Mr. Cahill has been a member of PBG's Board of Directors since January 1999 and
served as PBG's Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer prior to
becoming President and Chief Operating Officer in August 2000. He was Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Pepsi-Cola Company from April
1998 until November 1998. Prior to that, Mr. Cahill was Senior Vice President
and Treasurer of PepsiCo, having been appointed to that position in April 1997.
In 1996, he became Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Pepsi-Cola North America. Mr. Cahill joined PepsiCo in 1989 where he held
several other senior financial positions through 1996.
ALFRED H. DREWES, 47, is the Principal Financial Officer of Bottling LLC. He is
also PBG's Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Appointed to this
position in June 2001, Mr. Drewes previously served as Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of Pepsi Beverages International ("PBI"). Mr. Drewes
joined PepsiCo in 1982 as a financial analyst in New Jersey. During the next
nine years, he rose through increasingly responsible finance positions within
Pepsi-Cola North America in field operations and headquarters. In 1991, Mr.
Drewes joined PBI as Vice President of Manufacturing Operations, with
responsibility for the global concentrate supply organization.
ANDREA L. FORSTER, 43, is the Principal Accounting Officer of Bottling LLC. She
is also Vice President and Controller of PBG. In September 2000, Ms. Forster was
also named Corporate Compliance Officer for PBG. Following several years with
Deloitte Haskins and Sells, Ms. Forster joined PepsiCo in 1987 as a Senior
Analyst in External Reporting. She progressed through a number of positions in
the accounting and reporting functions and, in 1998, was appointed Assistant
Controller of the Pepsi-Cola Company. She was named Assistant Controller of PBG
in 1999.
10
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS
There is no public trading market for the ownership of Bottling LLC.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA
in millions
FISCAL YEARS ENDED 2002 2001 2000(1) 1999 1998
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA:
Net revenues.............................................. $ 9,216 $ 8,443 $ 7,982 $ 7,505 $ 7,041
Cost of sales............................................. 5,001 4,580 4,405 4,296 4,181
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Gross profit.............................................. 4,215 3,863 3,577 3,209 2,860
Selling, delivery and administrative expenses............. 3,318 3,185 2,986 2,813 2,583
Unusual impairment and other charges and credits (2)...... -- -- -- (16) 222
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Operating income.......................................... 897 678 591 412 55
Interest expense, net..................................... 98 78 89 129 157
Other non-operating expenses, net......................... 7 -- 1 1 26
Minority interest......................................... 9 14 8 5 4
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Income (loss) before income taxes......................... 783 586 493 277 (132)
Income tax (benefit) expense (3).......................... 49 (1) 22 4 (1)
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net income (loss)......................................... $ 734 $ 587 $ 471 $ 273 $ (131)
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
BALANCE SHEET DATA (AT PERIOD END):
Total assets.............................................. $ 10,907 $ 8,677 $ 8,228 $ 7,799 $ 7,227
Long-term debt:
Allocation of PepsiCo long-term debt.................. -- -- -- -- 2,300
Due to third parties.................................. 3,535 2,299 2,286 2,284 61
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total long-term debt.............................. $ 3,535 $ 2,299 $ 2,286 $ 2,284 $ 2,361
Minority interest......................................... $ -- $ 154 $ 147 $ 141 $ 112
Accumulated other comprehensive loss...................... $ (596) $ (416) $ (253) $ (222) $ (238)
Owners' equity............................................ $ 5,186 $ 4,596 $ 4,321 $ 3,928 $ 3,283
(1) Our fiscal year 2000 results were impacted by the inclusion of an extra
week in our fiscal year. The extra week increased net income by $12
million.
(2) Unusual impairment and other charges and credits comprises of the
following:
- - $45 million non-cash compensation charge in the second quarter of 1999.
- - $53 million vacation accrual reversal in the fourth quarter of 1999.
- - $8 million restructuring reserve reversal in the fourth quarter of 1999.
- - $222 million charge related to the restructuring of our Russian bottling
operations and the separation of Pepsi-Cola North America's concentrate
and bottling organizations in the fourth quarter of 1998.
(3) Fiscal Year 2001 includes Canada tax law change benefits of $25 million.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS.
See "Management's Financial Review" set forth in Item 8 below.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
See "Management's Financial Review" set forth in Item 8 below.
11
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The following consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of The Pepsi
Bottling Group, Inc. for the year ended December 28, 2002 are incorporated
herein by reference and are included as Exhibit 99.1 hereto:
Consolidated Statements of Operations - Fiscal years ended December 28, 2002,
December 29, 2001 and December 30, 2000.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Fiscal years ended December 28, 2002,
December 29, 2001 and December 30, 2000.
Consolidated Balance Sheets - December 28, 2002 and December 29, 2001.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity - Fiscal years ended
December 28, 2002, December 29, 2001 and December 30, 2000.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Report of Independent Auditors.
MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL REVIEW
TABULAR DOLLARS IN MILLIONS
OVERVIEW
Bottling Group, LLC (collectively referred to as "Bottling LLC," "we,"
"our" and "us") is the principal operating subsidiary of The Pepsi Bottling
Group, Inc. ("PBG") and consists of substantially all of the operations and
assets of PBG. Bottling LLC, which is 93% owned by PBG and is fully
consolidated, has the exclusive right to manufacture, sell and distribute
Pepsi-Cola beverages in all or a portion of the United States, Canada, Spain,
Greece, Russia, Turkey and, as a result of our recent acquisition, Mexico. In
2002, approximately 82% of our net revenues were generated in the United States
with the remaining 18% generated outside the United States. In 2003, we expect
approximately 72% of our net revenues to come from the U.S., 12% of our net
revenues to come from our newly acquired operations in Mexico, and the remaining
16% to come from operations outside the U.S. and Mexico.
The brands we sell are some of the best recognized trademarks in the world
and include PEPSI-COLA, DIET PEPSI, MOUNTAIN DEW, MOUNTAIN DEW CODE RED, LIPTON
BRISK, MUG, AQUAFINA, DIET MOUNTAIN DEW, PEPSI TWIST, STARBUCKS FRAPPUCCINO,
SIERRA MIST, DOLE and SOBE, and outside the U.S., PEPSI-COLA, MIRINDA, 7 UP,
KAS, ELECTROPURA, AQUA MINERALE, MANZANITA SOL, SQUIRT, GARCI CRESPO, FIESTA,
PEPSI LIGHT, IVI, YEDIGUN, and FRUKO. In some of our U.S. territories, we also
have the right to manufacture, sell and distribute soft drink products of other
companies other than PepsiCo, Inc., including DR PEPPER and ALL SPORT, and
through December 2002, 7 UP.
The following discussion and analysis covers the key drivers behind our
business performance in 2002 and is categorized into seven major sections. The
first four sections discuss application of critical accounting policies, related
party transactions, items that affect the comparability of historical or future
results and non-GAAP measures. The next two sections provide an analysis of our
results of operations and liquidity and financial condition. The last section
contains a discussion of our market risks and cautionary statements. The
discussion and analysis throughout Management's Financial Review should be read
in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the related
accompanying notes.
12
APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
("U.S. GAAP") requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts in our Consolidated Financial Statements and the related
accompanying notes, including various claims and contingencies related to
lawsuits, taxes, environmental and other matters arising out of the normal
course of business. We use our best judgment, based on the advice of external
experts and our knowledge of existing facts and circumstances and actions that
we may undertake in the future, in determining the estimates that affect our
Consolidated Financial Statements. For each of the critical accounting estimates
discussed below we have reviewed our policies, assumptions and related
disclosures with our Audit and Affiliated Transactions Committee.
ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS - A portion of our accounts receivable
will not be collected due to customer issues and bankruptcies. We provide
reserves for these situations based on the evaluation of the aging of our trade
receivable portfolio and a customer-by-customer analysis of our high-risk
customers. Our reserves contemplate our historical loss rate on receivables,
specific customer situations and the economic environments in which we operate.
As of December 28, 2002, our allowance for doubtful accounts was $67
million and $42 million as of December 29, 2001 and December 30, 2000, which
represents management's best estimate of probable losses inherent in our
portfolio. While the overall quality of our receivable portfolio has remained
relatively stable, we continue to pay particular attention to those customers
that represent a higher potential risk. In 2002, as a result of the
deterioration of the financial condition of certain customers, we have
recorded additional reserves based upon estimates of uncollectibility. The
following is an analysis of the allowance for doubtful accounts for the fiscal
years ended December 28, 2002, December 29, 2001, and December 30, 2000:
ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL
ACCOUNTS
----------------------
2002 2001 2000
------ ------ ------
Beginning of the year ..................... $ 42 $ 42 $ 48
Bad debt expense .......................... 32 9 3
Additions from acquisitions ............... 14 -- --
Accounts written off ...................... (22) (9) (8)
Foreign currency translation .............. 1 -- (1)
---- ---- ----
End of the year ........................... $ 67 $ 42 $ 42
==== ==== ====
Estimating an allowance for doubtful accounts requires significant
management judgment and is dependent upon the overall economic environment and
in particular, our customers' viability. We have effective credit controls in
place to manage these exposures and believe that our allowance for doubtful
accounts adequately provides for these risks.
RECOVERABILITY OF GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS WITH INDEFINITE LIVES -
During 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 142, "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets," which requires that goodwill and intangible assets with
indefinite useful lives no longer be amortized, but instead tested for
impairment. Effective the first day of fiscal year 2002, we no longer amortize
goodwill and certain franchise rights, but evaluate them for impairment
annually.
Our identifiable intangible assets principally arise from the allocation
of the purchase price of businesses acquired, and consist primarily of franchise
rights. Our franchise rights are typically perpetual in duration, subject to
compliance with the underlying franchise agreement. The value and life of our
franchise rights are directly associated with the underlying portfolio of brands
that we are entitled to make, sell and distribute under applicable franchise
agreements. In considering whether franchise rights have an indefinite useful
life, we consider the nature and terms of the underlying franchise agreements;
our intent and ability to use the franchise rights; and the age and market
position of the products within the franchise as well as the historical and
projected growth of those products. We assign amounts to such identifiable
intangibles based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition.
13
In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") Issue No. 02-07,
"Unit of Accounting for Testing Impairment of Indefinite-Lived Intangible
Assets," we evaluate our franchise rights with indefinite useful lives for
impairment annually as asset groups on a country-by-country basis ("asset
groups"). We measure the fair value of these asset groups utilizing discounted
estimated future cash flows, including a terminal value, which assumes the
franchise rights will continue in perpetuity. Our long-term terminal growth
assumptions reflect our current long-term view of the marketplace. Our discount
rate is based upon our weighted-average cost of capital plus an additional risk
premium to reflect the risk and uncertainty inherent in separately acquiring a
franchise agreement between a willing buyer and a willing seller. Each year we
re-evaluate our assumptions in our discounted cash flow model to address changes
in our business and marketplace conditions. Based upon our annual impairment
analysis, the estimated fair values of our franchise rights with indefinite
lives exceeded their carrying amounts in 2002.
14
In accordance with SFAS No. 142, we evaluate goodwill on a
country-by-country basis ("reporting unit") for impairment. We evaluate each
reporting unit for impairment based upon a two-step approach. First, we compare
the fair value of our reporting unit with its carrying value. Second, if the
carrying value of our reporting unit exceeds its fair value, we compare the
implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill to its carrying amount to
measure the amount of impairment loss. In measuring the implied fair value of
goodwill, we would allocate the fair value of the reporting unit to each of its
assets and liabilities (including any unrecognized intangible assets). Any
excess of the fair value of the reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its
assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of goodwill.
We measure the fair value of a reporting unit as the discounted estimated
future cash flows, including a terminal value, which assumes the business
continues in perpetuity, less its respective minority interest and net debt (net
of cash and cash equivalents). Our long-term terminal growth assumptions reflect
our current long-term view of the marketplace. Our discount rate is based upon
our weighted average cost of capital. Each year we re-evaluate our assumptions
in our discounted cash flow model to address changes in our business and
marketplace conditions. Based upon our annual impairment analysis in the fourth
quarter of 2002, the estimated fair value of our reporting units exceeded their
carrying value and as a result, we did not proceed to the second step of the
impairment test.
Considerable management judgment is necessary to estimate discounted
future cash flows, which may be impacted by future actions taken by us and our
competitors and the volatility in the markets in which we conduct business. A
change in assumptions in our cash flows could have a significant impact on the
fair value of our reporting units, which could then result in a material
impairment charge to our results of operations.
PENSION AND POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS - We sponsor pension and other
postretirement benefit plans in various forms, covering employees who meet
specified eligibility requirements. We account for our defined benefit pension
plans and our postretirement benefit plans using actuarial models required by
SFAS No. 87, "Employers' Accounting for Pensions," and SFAS No. 106, "Employers'
Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions." The amounts
necessary to fund future payouts under these plans are subject to numerous
assumptions and variables including anticipated discount rate, expected rate of
return on plan assets and future compensation levels. We evaluate these
assumptions with our actuarial advisors on an annual basis and we believe that
they are appropriate and within acceptable industry ranges, although an increase
or decrease in the assumptions or economic events outside our control could have
a material impact on reported net income.
The assets, liabilities and assumptions used to measure expense for any
fiscal year are determined as of September 30 of the preceding year
("measurement date"). The discount rate assumption used in our pension and
postretirement benefit plans' accounting is based on current interest rates for
high-quality, long-term corporate debt as determined on each measurement date.
The expected return on plan assets is based on our long-term historical
experience, our plan asset allocation and our expectations for long-term
interest rates and market performance. In evaluating our rate of return on
assets for a given fiscal year, we consider a 15 to 20 year time horizon for our
pension investment portfolio. In addition, we look at the return on asset
assumptions used by other companies in our industry as well as other large
companies. Over the past three fiscal years the composition of our plan assets
was approximately 70%-75% equity investments and 25%-30% fixed income
securities, which primarily consist of U.S. government and corporate bonds.
Differences between actual and expected returns are generally recognized in the
net periodic pension calculation over five years. To the extent the amount of
all unrecognized gains and losses exceeds 10% of the larger of the benefit
obligation or plan assets, such amount is amortized over the average remaining
service life of active participants. The rate of future compensation increases
is based upon our historical experience and management's best estimate regarding
future expectations. We amortize prior service costs on a straight-line basis
over the average remaining service period of employees expected to receive
benefits.
For our postretirement plans that provide medical and life insurance
benefits, we review external data and our historical health care cost trends
with our actuarial advisors to determine the health care cost trend rates.
15
During 2002, our defined benefit pension and postretirement expenses
were $41 million. We utilized the following weighted-average assumptions to
compute our pension and postretirement expense in 2002:
Discount rate.................................................... 7.5%
Expected return on plan assets (net of administrative expenses).. 9.5%
Rate of compensation increase.................................... 4.3%
In 2003 our defined benefit pension and postretirement expenses will
increase by $36 million due primarily to the following:
- A decrease in our net weighted-average expected return on plan
assets from 9.5% to 8.5% due to declines in the level of returns on
our plan assets over the last several years. Additionally,
amortization of asset losses resulting from differences between our
expected and actual return on plan assets will contribute to the
increase in our pension expense during 2003. These changes will
increase our 2003 defined benefit pension and postretirement expense
by approximately $15 million.
- A decrease in our weighted-average discount rate for our pension and
postretirement expense from 7.5% to 6.8%, reflecting declines in the
yields of long-term corporate bonds. This assumption change will
increase our defined benefit pension and postretirement expense by
approximately $15 million.
- Expiration of amortization credits, changes in demographics and
medical trend rates, and other plan changes will increase our
defined benefit pension and postretirement expense by approximately
$16 million; and
- Contributions of $151 million to our pension plan during 2002 will
reduce our 2003 defined benefit pension expense by approximately $10
million. Our plans have been funded to be in compliance with the
funding provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of
1974 and have been made in accordance with applicable tax
regulations that provide for current tax deductions for our
contributions and for taxation to the employee of plan benefits when
the benefits are received.
INCOME TAXES - We are a limited liability company, taxable as a
partnership for U.S. tax purposes and, as such, generally will pay no U.S.
federal or state income taxes. Our federal and state distributable share of
income, deductions and credits will be allocated to our owners based on their
percentage of ownership. However, certain domestic and foreign affiliates pay
taxes in their respective jurisdictions and record related deferred income tax
assets and liabilities. Deferred income taxes reflect the impact of temporary
differences between assets and liabilities recognized for financial reporting
purposes and such amounts recognized for income tax purposes. In accordance with
SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes," these deferred taxes are measured
by applying currently enacted tax laws. With the exception of certain of our
subsidiaries for which we have recorded deferred taxes in our Consolidated
Financial Statements, deferred taxes associated with our U.S. operations are
recorded directly by our owners.
A number of years may elapse before a particular matter for which we have
established a reserve is audited and finally resolved. While it is often
difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of the resolution, we
believe that our reserves reflect the probable outcome of known
16
tax contingencies. Favorable resolutions would be recognized as a reduction to
our tax expense in the year of resolution. Unfavorable resolutions would be
recognized as a reduction of our reserves and a cash outlay for settlement.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
PepsiCo, Inc. is considered a related party due to the nature of
our franchisee relationship and its ownership interest in our company.
Approximately 90% of our 2002 volume was derived from the sale of Pepsi-Cola
beverages. In addition, at December 28, 2002, PepsiCo owned 6.8% of our equity.
We have entered into a number of agreements with PepsiCo since PBG's
initial public offering. Although we are not a direct party to these contracts,
as the principal operating subsidiary of PBG, we derive direct benefit from
them. Accordingly, set forth below are the most significant agreements that
govern our relationship with PepsiCo:
(1) The master bottling agreement for cola beverages bearing the
"Pepsi-Cola" and "Pepsi" trademark in the United States; master
bottling agreements and distribution agreements for non-cola
products in the United States, including Mountain Dew; and a master
fountain syrup agreement in the United States;
(2) Agreements similar to the master bottling agreement and the non-cola
agreements for each country, including Canada, Spain, Russia,
Greece, Turkey and Mexico, as well as a fountain syrup agreement
similar to the master syrup agreement for Canada;
(3) A shared services agreement whereby PepsiCo provides us or we
provide PepsiCo with certain support, including information
technology maintenance, procurement of raw materials, shared space,
employee benefits, credit and collection, international tax and
accounting services. The amounts paid or received under this
contract are equal to the actual costs incurred by the company
providing the service. Through 2001, a PepsiCo affiliate provided
casualty insurance to us; and
(4) Transition agreements that provide certain indemnities to the
parties, and provide for the allocation of tax and other assets,
liabilities, and obligations arising from periods prior to the
initial public offering. Under our tax separation agreement, PepsiCo
maintains full control and absolute discretion for any combined or
consolidated tax filings for tax periods ended on or before the
initial public offering. PepsiCo has contractually agreed to act in
good faith with respect to all tax audit matters affecting us. In
addition, PepsiCo has agreed to use its best efforts to settle all
joint interests in any common audit issue on a basis consistent with
prior practice.
BOTTLER INCENTIVES AND OTHER ARRANGEMENTS - We share a business objective
with PepsiCo of increasing the availability and consumption of Pepsi-Cola
beverages. Accordingly, PepsiCo, at its discretion, provides us with various
forms of bottler incentives to promote its beverages. These incentives cover a
variety of initiatives, including direct marketplace support, capital equipment
funding and advertising support. Based on the objective of the programs and
initiatives, we record bottler incentives as an adjustment to net revenues or as
a reduction of selling, delivery and administrative expenses. Direct marketplace
support represents PepsiCo's funding to assist us in offering sales and
promotional discounts to retailers and is recorded as an adjustment to net
revenues. Capital equipment funding is designed to help offset the costs of
purchasing and installing marketing equipment, such as vending machines and
glass door coolers at customer locations and is recorded as a reduction of
selling, delivery and administrative expenses. Advertising support represents
the cost of media time, promotional materials, and other advertising and
marketing costs that are funded by PepsiCo and is recorded as a reduction to
advertising and marketing expenses within selling, delivery and administrative
expenses. In addition, PepsiCo may share certain media costs with us due to our
joint objective of promoting PepsiCo brands. There are no conditions or other
requirements that could result in a repayment of the bottler incentives
received. Bottler incentives received from PepsiCo, including media costs shared
by PepsiCo, were $560 million, $554 million and $524 million for 2002, 2001 and
2000, respectively. Of these amounts, we
17
recorded $257 million, $262 million and $244 million for 2002, 2001 and 2000,
respectively, in net revenues, and the remainder as a reduction of selling,
delivery and administrative expenses.
PURCHASES OF CONCENTRATE AND FINISHED PRODUCT - We purchase concentrate
from PepsiCo, which is the critical flavor ingredient used in the production of
carbonated soft drinks and other ready-to-drink beverages. PepsiCo determines
the price of concentrate annually at its discretion. We also pay a royalty fee
to PepsiCo for the Aquafina trademark. Amounts paid or payable to PepsiCo and
its affiliates for concentrate and royalty fees were $1,699 million, $1,584
million and $1,507 million in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
We also produce or distribute other products and purchase finished goods
and concentrate through various arrangements with PepsiCo or PepsiCo joint
ventures. During 2002, 2001 and 2000, total amounts paid or payable to PepsiCo
for these transactions were $464 million, $375 million and $155 million,
respectively.
We provide manufacturing services to PepsiCo and PepsiCo affiliates in
connection with the production of certain finished beverage products. During
2002, 2001 and 2000, total amounts paid or payable by PepsiCo for these
transactions were $10 million, $32 million and $36 million, respectively.
FOUNTAIN SERVICE FEE - We manufacture and distribute fountain products and
provide fountain equipment service to PepsiCo customers in some territories in
accordance with the Pepsi beverage agreements. Amounts received from PepsiCo for
these transactions are offset by the cost to provide these services and are
reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Operations in selling, delivery and
administrative expenses. Net amounts paid or payable by PepsiCo to us for these
services were approximately $200 million, $185 million and $189 million, in
2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
OTHER TRANSACTIONS - Prior to 2002, Hillbrook Insurance Company, Inc., a
subsidiary of PepsiCo, provided insurance and risk management services to us
pursuant to a contractual agreement. Total premiums paid to Hillbrook Insurance
Company, Inc. during 2001 and 2000 were $58 million and $62 million,
respectively.
We provide PepsiCo and PepsiCo affiliates or PepsiCo provides us various
services pursuant to a shared services agreement and other arrangements,
including information technology maintenance, procurement of raw materials,
shared space, employee benefits, credit and collection, international tax and
accounting services. Total net expenses incurred were approximately $57 million,
$133 million and $117 million during 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
We purchase snack food products from Frito-Lay, Inc., a subsidiary of
PepsiCo, for sale and distribution in all of Russia except Moscow. Amounts paid
or payable to PepsiCo and its affiliates for snack food products were $44
million, $27 million and $24 million in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
18
The Consolidated Statements of Operations include the following income
(expense) amounts as a result of transactions with PepsiCo and its affiliates:
2002 2001 2000
------- ------- -------
Net revenues:
Bottler incentives ................................... $ 257 $ 262 $ 244
======= ======= =======
Cost of sales:
Purchases of concentrate and finished products,
and Aquafina royalty fees ........................ $(2,163) $(1,959) $(1,662)
Manufacturing and distribution service reimbursements 10 32 36
------- ------- -------
$(2,153) $(1,927) $(1,626)
======= ======= =======
Selling, delivery and administrative expenses:
Bottler incentives ................................... $ 303 $ 292 $ 280
Fountain service fee ................................. 200 185 189
Frito-Lay purchases .................................. (44) (27) (24)
Insurance costs ...................................... -- (58) (62)
Shared services ...................................... (57) (133) (117)
------- ------- -------
$ 402 $ 259 $ 266
======= ======= =======
We are not required to pay any minimum fees to PepsiCo, nor are we
obligated to PepsiCo under any minimum purchase requirements.
As part of our acquisition in Turkey, we paid PepsiCo $8 million for its
share of Fruko Mesrubat Sanayii A.S. and related entities. In addition, we sold
certain brands to PepsiCo from the net assets acquired for $16 million.
As part of our acquisition of Gemex of Mexico, PepsiCo received $297
million for the tender of its shares for its 34.4% ownership in the
outstanding capital stock of Gemex. In addition, PepsiCo made a payment to us
for $17 million, to facilitate the purchase and ensure a smooth ownership
transition of Gemex.
We paid PepsiCo $10 million and $9 million during 2002 and 2001,
respectively, for distribution rights relating to the SoBe brand in certain
PBG-owned territories in the U.S. and Canada.
The $1.3 billion of 5 5/8% senior notes and the $1.0 billion of 5 3/8%
senior notes issued on February 9, 1999, by us are guaranteed by PepsiCo. In
addition, the $1.0 billion of 4 5/8% senior notes issued on November 15, 2002,
also by us, will be guaranteed by PepsiCo in accordance with the terms set forth
in the related indenture.
Amounts payable to PepsiCo and its affiliates were $26 million and $17
million at December 28, 2002 and December 29, 2001, respectively. Such amounts
are recorded within accounts payable and other current liabilities in our
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
PBG is considered a related party, as we are the principal
operating subsidiary of PBG and we make up substantially of all of the
operations and assets of PBG. At December 28, 2002, PBG owned approximately
93.2% of our equity.
Beginning in 2002, PBG provides insurance and risk management services to
us pursuant to a contractual agreement. Total premiums paid to PBG during 2002
was $86 million.
We have loaned PBG $117 million and $310 million during 2002 and 2001,
respectively, net of repayments. During 2002, these loans were made through a
series of 1-year notes, with interest rates ranging from 1.9% to 2.5%. Total
intercompany loans owed to us from PBG at December 28, 2002 and December 29,
2001, was $954 million and $837 million, respectively. The proceeds were used by
PBG to pay for interest, taxes, dividends, share repurchases and acquisitions.
19
Accrued interest receivable from PBG on these notes totaled $22 million and $44
million at December 28, 2002 and December 29, 2001, respectively, and is
included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in our Consolidated
Balance Sheets.
Total interest income recognized in our Consolidated Statements of
Operations relating to outstanding loans with PBG was $24 million, $44 million
and $36 million, in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
On March 8, 1999, PBG issued $1 billion of 7% senior notes due 2029, which
are guaranteed by us.
PBG has a $500 million commercial paper program that is supported by two
$250 million credit facilities, which is guaranteed by us. One of the credit
facilities expires in May 2003 and the other credit facility expires in April
2004. There were no borrowings outstanding under these credit facilities at
December 28, 2002, or December 29, 2001.
We also guarantee that to the extent there is available cash, we will
distribute pro rata to PBG and PepsiCo sufficient cash such that aggregate cash
distributed to PBG will enable PBG to pay its taxes and make interest payments
on the $1 billion 7% senior notes due 2029. During 2002 and 2001, we made cash
distributions to our owners totaling $156 million and $223 million,
respectively. Any amounts in excess of taxes and interest payments were used by
PBG to repay loans to us.
Managing Directors and Officers
One of our managing directors is an employee of PepsiCo and the other
managing director and officers are employees of PBG.
ITEMS THAT AFFECT HISTORICAL OR FUTURE COMPARABILITY
Gemex Acquisition
In November 2002, we acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of
Gemex. Our total acquisition cost consisted of a net cash payment of $871
million and assumed debt of approximately $305 million. The Gemex acquisition
was made to allow us to increase our markets outside the United States. Gemex is
the largest Pepsi-Cola bottler in Mexico and the largest bottler outside the
United States of Pepsi-Cola soft drink products based on sales volume. Gemex
produces, sells and distributes a variety of soft drink products under the
PEPSI-COLA, PEPSI LIGHT, PEPSI MAX, PEPSI LIMON, MIRINDA, 7 UP, DIET 7 UP, KAS,
MOUNTAIN DEW, POWER PUNCH and MANZANITA SOL trademarks, under exclusive
franchise and bottling arrangements with PepsiCo and certain affiliates of
PepsiCo. Gemex also has rights to produce, sell and distribute in Mexico soft
drink products of other companies and it produces, sells and distributes
purified and mineral water in Mexico under the trademarks ELECTROPURA and GARCI
CRESPO, respectively. As a result of the acquisition of Gemex, we own the
Electropura and Garci Crespo brands.
New Accounting Standards
During 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations," which
requires that the purchase method of accounting be used for all business
combinations initiated or completed after June 30, 2001, and SFAS No. 142,
"Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," which requires that goodwill and
intangible assets with indefinite useful lives no longer be amortized, but
instead tested for impairment. Effective the first day of fiscal year 2002, we
no longer amortize goodwill and certain franchise rights, but evaluate them for
impairment annually. Based on our annual impairment review, we have determined
that our intangible assets are not impaired. If we had adopted SFAS No. 142 at
the beginning of 2000 our amortization expense would have been reduced by
approximately $129 million in each of 2001 and 2000. In addition, net income
would have increased by approximately $123 million to $710 million in 2001 and
$123 million to $594 million in 2000.
During 2002, the EITF addressed various issues related to the income
statement classification of certain payments received by a customer from a
vendor. In November 2002, the EITF reached a consensus on Issue No. 02-16,
"Accounting by a Reseller for Cash Consideration Given by a Vendor to a
Customer (Including a Reseller of the Vendor's Products)," addressing the
recognition and income statement classification of various consideration given
by a vendor to a customer. Among its requirements, the
20
consensus requires that certain cash consideration received by a customer from a
vendor is presumed to be a reduction of the price of the vendor's products, and
therefore should be characterized as a reduction of cost of sales when
recognized in the customer's income statement, unless certain criteria are met.
EITF Issue No. 02-16 will be effective beginning in our fiscal year 2003. We
currently classify bottler incentives received from PepsiCo and other brand
owners as adjustments to net revenues and selling, delivery and administrative
expenses. In accordance with EITF Issue No. 02-16, we will classify certain
bottler incentives as a reduction of cost of sales beginning in 2003. We are
currently assessing the transitional guidance released by the EITF to determine
the net impact to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Fiscal Year
Our fiscal year ends on the last Saturday in December and, as a result, a
53rd week is added every five or six years. Fiscal years 2002 and 2001 consisted
of 52 weeks, while fiscal year 2000 consisted of 53 weeks. The following table
illustrates the approximate dollar and percentage point impacts that the extra
week had on our operating results:
PERCENTAGE
POINTS
DOLLARS 2001 VS. 2000
------- -------------
Volume ....................................... N/A (2)
Net Revenues ................................. $113 (1)
Net Income ................................... $ 12 (3)
Concentrate Supply
We buy concentrate, the critical flavor ingredient for our products, from
PepsiCo, its affiliates and other brand owners who are the sole authorized
suppliers. Concentrate prices are typically determined annually.
In February 2002, PepsiCo announced an increase of approximately 3% in
the price of U.S. concentrate. PepsiCo has recently announced a further
increase of approximately 2%, effective February 2003. Amounts paid or payable
to PepsiCo and its affiliates for concentrate were $1,590 million, $1,502
million and $1,450 million in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively, which excludes
any payments to PepsiCo for royalty fees associated with the Aquafina
trademark.
21
NON-GAAP MEASURES
We utilize certain non-GAAP measures to evaluate our performance. We
consider these measures important indicators of our success. These measures
should not be considered an alternative to measurements required by U.S. GAAP
such as net income and net cash provided by operations or should not be
considered measures of our liquidity. In addition, our non-GAAP measures may not
be comparable to similar measures reported by other companies and could be
misleading unless all companies and analysts calculate them in the same manner.
Our key non-GAAP measures are:
Constant Territory
We believe that constant territory performance results are the most
appropriate indicators of operating trends and performance, particularly in
light of our stated intention of acquiring additional bottling territories, and
are consistent with industry practice. Constant territory operating results are
derived by adjusting current year results to exclude significant current year
acquisitions and adjusting prior year results to include the results of
significant prior year acquisitions as if they had occurred on the first day of
the prior fiscal year. In addition, 2000 constant territory results exclude the
impact from an additional week in our fiscal year ("53rd week"), which occurs
every five or six years, as our fiscal year ends on the last Saturday in
December.
Our constant territory results exclude the operating results of the
following businesses acquired during 2002:
- Fruko Mesrubat Sanayii A.S. and related companies of Turkey in March
2002.
- Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of Macon, Inc. of Georgia in March 2002.
- Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of Aroostook, Inc., of Presque Isle,
Maine in June 2002.
- Seaman's Beverages Limited of the Canadian province of Prince Edward
Island in July 2002.
- Pepsi-Gemex, S.A. de. C.V of Mexico in November 2002.
- Kitchener Beverages Limited of Ontario, Canada in December 2002.
We adjusted our prior year results to include the operating results of the
following prior year acquisitions as if they had occurred on the first day of
the prior fiscal year:
- Pepsi-Cola Bottling of Northern California in May 2001.
- Pepsi-Cola Elmira Bottling Co. Inc. of New York in August 2001.
Our prior year pro forma adjustments did not have a material impact on our
constant territory results.
The table below reconciles our U.S. GAAP reported results to our constant
territory results for 2002 vs. 2001 on a worldwide basis:
WORLDWIDE 2002 VS. 2001
---------------------------------
AS IMPACT FROM IMPACT FROM 2001 CONSTANT
REPORTED 2002 PRO FORMA TERRITORY
CHANGE ACQUISITIONS ADJUSTMENTS CHANGE
------- ------------ -------------- --------
Net revenues ................. 9% -4% 0% 5%
Net revenue per case ......... 1% 2% 0% 3%
Cost of sales ................ 9% -5% 0% 4%
Cost of sales per case ....... 1% 2% 0% 3%
22
The table below reconciles our U.S. GAAP reported results to our constant
territory results for 2002 vs. 2001 for our U.S. operations:
U.S. 2002 VS. 2001
---------------------------------
AS IMPACT FROM IMPACT FROM 2001 CONSTANT
REPORTED 2002 PRO FORMA TERRITORY
CHANGE ACQUISITIONS ADJUSTMENTS CHANGE
------- ------------ -------------- --------
Net revenues ................. 5% 0% 0% 5%
Net revenue per case ......... 3% 0% 0% 3%
Cost of sales ................ 5% 0% -1% 4%
Cost of sales per case ....... 3% 0% 0% 3%
The table below reconciles our U.S. GAAP reported results to our constant
territory results for 2002 vs. 2001 for our operations outside the United
States:
OUTSIDE THE U.S. 2002 VS. 2001
---------------------------------
AS IMPACT FROM IMPACT FROM 2001 CONSTANT
REPORTED 2002 PRO FORMA TERRITORY
CHANGE ACQUISITIONS ADJUSTMENTS CHANGE
------- ------------ -------------- --------
Net revenues .............. 32% -26% 0% 6%
Net revenue per case ...... -1% 4% 0% 3%
Cost of sales ............. 31% -25% 0% 6%
Cost of sales per case .... -1% 4% 0% 3%
EBITDA
Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization or EBITDA,
which is computed as operating income plus the sum of depreciation and
amortization, is a key indicator that we and others in our industry use to
evaluate operating performance. We believe that current shareholders and
potential investors in our company use multiples of EBITDA in making investment
decisions about our company. We use multiples of EBITDA in combination with
discounted cash flow analysis as the primary method of determining the value of
bottling operations.
The table below reconciles Operating Income to EBITDA for 2002 and 2001:
2002 2001 % CHANGE
------- ------ --------
Operating Income ........ $ 897 $ 678 32%
Add back:
Depreciation .......... 443 379
Amortization .......... 8 135
------ ------
EBITDA $1,348 $1,192 13%
====== ====== ======
23
FINANCIAL OVERVIEW
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - 2002
- ----------------------------
VOLUME
2002 vs. 2001
-------------
AS CONSTANT
REPORTED TERRITORY
CHANGE CHANGE
------ ------
Volume ....... 8% 2%
Our worldwide reported physical case volume increased 8% in 2002,
reflecting a 6% increase in volume resulting from our acquisitions and a 2%
increase in base volume. In the U.S., reported volume increased by 2%,
reflecting a 1% increase from acquisitions and a 1% increase in base volume. The
weakness in the economy and less travel caused softness in our U.S. results in
the second half of the year. However, take-home volume, particularly in food
stores, as well as volume in our convenience and gas segment continues to grow.
Additionally, U.S. volume growth continued to benefit from innovation, as well
as the strong growth of Aquafina, offset by declines in trademark Pepsi. Outside
the U.S., our volumes increased 32% reflecting a 29% increase from our
acquisitions in Turkey and Mexico. Volume outside the U.S. from our base
business increased 3% due to double-digit growth in Russia driven by the strong
performance of trademark Pepsi and Aqua Minerale, our water product, which was
partially offset by volume declines in Spain.
In 2003, we expect our worldwide constant territory volume to grow
between 2% and 3%. In the U.S., we expect our constant territory volume growth
projections to be flat to 1% for the full year, which includes a 50 to 100
basis point negative impact from our Sierra Mist transition. Beginning in 2003,
we will no longer distribute 7UP in the U.S. as we have decided to
manufacture, sell, and distribute Sierra Mist exclusively in all of our U.S.
markets. This conversion will affect about one third of our markets and will
facilitate a unified and more effective selling and marketing proposition as we
support a single growing lemon-lime brand.
NET REVENUES
2002 vs. 2001
-------------
AS CONSTANT
REPORTED TERRITORY
CHANGE CHANGE
------ ------
Net revenues ............ 9% 5%
Net revenue per case .... 1% 3%
Reported net revenues were $9.2 billion, a 9% increase over the prior
year, reflecting an 8% increase in volume and a 1% increase in net revenue per
case. In the U.S., reported net revenues increased 5% reflecting a 3% increase
in net revenue per case and a 2% increase in volumes. Net revenue per case
growth in the U.S. benefited from rate increases combined with lapping of
account level investment spending in the fourth quarter of 2001. Reported net
revenues outside the U.S. grew approximately 32%, reflecting a 32% increase in
volume offset by a 1% decrease in net revenue per case. Net revenue per case
outside the U.S. grew 3% after excluding the impact of acquisitions. The
favorable impact of currency translations contributed over 1% to our net revenue
per case growth in 2002 outside the United States.
Our reported worldwide net revenues are expected to increase
approximately 16% in 2003. The majority of the increase in net revenues will be
driven by the full year impact of results from the acquisitions made during
2002, combined with volume increases from our base business.
24
COST OF SALES
2002 vs. 2001
-------------
CONSTANT
REPORTED TERRITORY
CHANGE CHANGE
------ ------
Cost of sales ............ 9% 4%
Cost of sales per case ... 1% 3%
Cost of sales was $5.0 billion, a 9% increase over the prior year,
reflecting an 8% increase in volume and a 1% increase in cost of sales per case.
In the U.S., cost of sales increased by 5% reflecting a 3% increase in cost of
sales per case and a 2% increase in volume. The increase in U.S. cost of sales
per case was driven by higher concentrate costs and mix shifts into higher cost
packages. Cost of sales outside the U.S. grew by 31% reflecting a 32% increase
in volume offset by a 1% decrease in cost of sales per case.
In 2003, we expect our reported cost of sales per case to decrease in the
mid single digits, due largely to the lower cost structure from our newly
acquired international operations partially offset by an increase in concentrate
prices of 2% in the United States.
SELLING, DELIVERY AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Selling, delivery and administrative expenses grew $133 million, or 4% in
2002. Had we adopted SFAS No. 142 on the first day of 2001, amortization expense
would have been lowered by $129 million in 2001. The impact of the adoption of
SFAS No. 142 was largely offset by increased selling, delivery and
administrative expenses resulting from our acquisitions in Mexico and Turkey.
Excluding acquisitions and the effects of adopting SFAS No. 142, selling,
delivery and administrative expenses were up 4% for the year driven by growth in
our business and our continued investment in marketing equipment partially
offset by favorable productivity gains. Selling, delivery and administrative
expenses were also favorably impacted as we lapped higher labor costs associated
with labor contract negotiations in the prior year partially offset by increased
accounts receivable reserves resulting from the deterioration of the financial
condition of certain customers.
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense decreased by $1 million in 2002 primarily reflecting the
lower interest rate environment partially offset by increased interest expense
from our new issuance of $1 billion in debt, the proceeds of which were utilized
to finance our acquisition of Gemex.
INTEREST INCOME
Interest income decreased $21 million, or 39%, due to lower interest rates
offset by additional loans with PBG.
25
OTHER NON-OPERATING EXPENSE, NET
Net other non-operating expense in 2002 increased $7 million due primarily
to the amortization of premiums associated with derivative instruments that were
utilized to mitigate currency risk in our acquisition of Gemex.
MINORITY INTEREST
Prior to 2002, PBG had a direct minority ownership in one of our
subsidiaries. Accordingly, our Consolidated Financial Statements reflect PBG's
share of consolidated net income as minority interest in our Consolidated
Statements of Operations. The decrease in minority interest expense over the
prior period is due to the fact that in October 2002 PBG made an equity
contribution to us of its minority ownership in our subsidiary, thereby
eliminating PBG's minority interest from that point forward. As a result of this
transaction, PBG's ownership in us interest increased from 93.0% to 93.2%.
INCOME TAX EXPENSE BEFORE RATE CHANGE
We are a limited liability company, taxable as a partnership for U.S. tax
purposes and, as such, generally pay no U.S. federal or state income taxes. We
allocate the federal and state distributable share of income, deductions and
credits to our owners based on percentage ownership. However, certain of our
domestic and foreign affiliates pay income taxes in their respective
jurisdictions. Such amounts are reflected in our Consolidated Statements of
Operations.
OPERATING INCOME/EBITDA
Operating income was $897 million, representing a 32% increase over 2001.
This growth reflects the positive impact from higher pricing, volume growth from
our acquisitions and base business, and the adoption of SFAS No. 142 during 2002
partially offset by increased selling, delivery and administrative expenses.
EBITDA (see page 23 for our definition of and use of EBITDA) was $1,348 million
in 2002, representing a 13% increase over 2001. This growth was a reflection of
higher pricing, volume growth from our acquisitions and base business, partially
offset by an increase in selling, delivery and administrative expenses resulting
from growth in our business. In 2003, we expect our reported operating income to
grow approximately 15% driven largely by our 2002 acquisitions.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - 2001
- ----------------------------
VOLUME
2001 vs. 2000
-------------
AS CONSTANT
REPORTED TERRITORY
CHANGE CHANGE
------ ------
Volume ................... 2% 3%
Our worldwide physical case volume grew 2% in 2001, including an
approximate 2 percentage point negative impact from the 53rd week in 2000.
Constant territory volume growth was 3% in 2001, reflecting U.S. growth of more
than 1% and 10% growth outside the United States. U.S. growth was led by the
introductions of Mountain Dew Code Red and Pepsi Twist, expanded distribution of
Sierra Mist, strong growth in Aquafina, as well as the integration of SoBe in
the majority of our markets. This growth was partially offset by declines in
brand Pepsi. New product innovation and consistent in-store execution resulted
in positive cold drink and take-home volume growth in the United States. In
addition, take-home volume growth in the U.S. benefited from significant growth
in mass merchandiser volume. Outside the U.S., all countries delivered solid
volume growth in 2001, led by our operations in Russia. Volume growth in Russia
was driven by the introduction of Mountain Dew and continued growth of Aqua
Minerale, our water product, and Fiesta, our value-brand beverage.
26
NET REVENUES
2001 vs. 2000
-------------
AS CONSTANT
REPORTED TERRITORY
CHANGE CHANGE
------ ------
Net revenues ............ 6% 6%
Net revenue per case .... 3% 3%
Reported net revenues were $8,443 million in 2001, representing a 6%
increase over the prior year, including an approximate 1 percentage point
negative impact from the 53rd week in 2000. On a constant territory basis, net
revenues increased by 6%, reflecting 3% volume growth and 3% growth in net
revenue per case. Constant territory U.S. net revenues grew 6% consisting of 5%
growth in net revenue per case and volume growth of more than 1%. U.S. net
revenue per case results reflect higher pricing, primarily in food stores, and
an increased mix of higher revenue cold drink volume from new product innovation
and double-digit Aquafina growth. Constant territory net revenues outside the
U.S. grew 7%, reflecting volume growth of 10% offset by declines in net revenue
per case of 3%. Excluding the negative impact from currency translations, net
revenue per case growth was flat outside the U.S. and increased 4% worldwide.
COST OF SALES
2001 vs. 2000
-------------
CONSTANT
REPORTED TERRITORY
CHANGE CHANGE
------ ------
Cost of sales ............ 4% 5%
Cost of sales per case ... 1% 1%
Cost of sales increased $175 million, or 4% in 2001, including an
approximate 2 percentage point favorable impact from the 53rd week in 2000. On a
constant territory basis, cost of sales increased 5% driven by a 3% increase in
volume and a more than 1% increase in cost of sales per case. The increase in
cost of sales per case reflects higher U.S. concentrate costs and mix shifts
into higher cost packages and products, offset by country mix and favorable
currency translations.
SELLING, DELIVERY AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Selling, delivery and administrative expenses grew $199 million, or 7%,
over the comparable period in 2000, including an approximate 1 percentage point
favorable impact from the 53rd week in 2000. Approximately half of the increase
came from higher selling and delivery costs, specifically our continued
investments in our U.S. and Canadian cold drink strategy including people,
routes and equipment. Also contributing to the growth in selling, delivery and
administrative expenses are higher advertising and marketing costs, and higher
costs associated with investments in our information technology systems.
27
INTEREST EXPENSE
Fiscal year 2001 interest expense was $4 million lower than in 2000 mainly
due to a lower effective interest rate on our debt, which resulted from
decreasing market interest rates in 2001.
INTEREST INCOME
Fiscal year 2001 interest income was $7 million higher than 2000. The
increase in interest income primarily reflects additional loans to PBG, which
were used by PBG to pay for interest, taxes and share repurchases.
MINORITY INTEREST
PBG has a direct minority ownership in one of our subsidiaries.
Accordingly, our Consolidated Financial Statements reflect PBG's share of
consolidated net income as minority interest in our Consolidated Statements of
Operations. The growth in minority interest expense is due to higher earnings by
our subsidiary.
INCOME TAX EXPENSE BEFORE RATE CHANGE
Bottling LLC is a limited liability company, taxable as a partnership for
U.S. tax purposes and, as such, generally pays no U.S. federal or state income
taxes. The federal and state distributable share of income, deductions and
credits of Bottling LLC are allocated to Bottling LLC's owners based on
percentage ownership. However, certain domestic and foreign affiliates pay
income taxes in their respective jurisdictions. Such amounts are reflected in
our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
INCOME TAX RATE CHANGE BENEFIT
During 2001, the Canadian Government enacted legislation reducing federal
and certain provincial corporate income tax rates. These rate changes reduced
deferred tax liabilities associated with our operations in Canada, and resulted
in one-time gains totaling $25 million in 2001.
EBITDA
On a reported basis, EBITDA (see page 23 for our definition of and use of
EBITDA) was $1,192 million in 2001, representing a 12% increase over 2000,
including an approximate 2 percentage point negative impact from the 53rd week
in 2000. This growth was a reflection of higher pricing, an increased mix of
higher margin cold drink volume, and solid volume growth in the U.S., as well as
continued growth in our operations outside the U.S., particularly in Russia.
These increases were partially offset by investments in our cold drink
infrastructure.
28
LIQUIDITY AND FINANCIAL CONDITION
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We have financed our capital investments and acquisitions primarily
through cash flows from operations except for the acquisition of Gemex, which
was financed through the issuance of $1 billion of senior notes. We believe that
our future cash flows from operations and borrowing capacity will be sufficient
to fund capital expenditures, acquisitions, dividends and working capital
requirements.
We intend to refinance all or a portion of our $1 billion of 5 3/8% senior
notes on their maturity in February 2004. We are currently in compliance with
all debt covenants in our indenture agreements discussed below.
Financing Transactions Relating to our Acquisition of Gemex
During 2002 PBG issued $645 million in commercial paper and loaned it to
us, which was utilized as bridge financing in connection with our acquisition of
Gemex. In November 2002, the loans were repaid after our issuance of $1 billion
of 4 5/8% senior notes due in November 2012. We utilized the net proceeds of the
$1 billion of 4 5/8% senior notes, together with available cash on hand, for our
acquisition of Gemex and the covenant defeasance and repayment of a portion of
Gemex's debt. The $1 billion of 4 5/8% senior notes will be guaranteed by
PepsiCo in accordance with the terms set forth in the related indenture.
Other Financing Transactions
We converted our entire $1.0 billion of 5 3/8% senior notes and $0.3
billion of 5 5/8% senior notes to floating rate debt through the use of interest
rate swaps with the objective of reducing our overall borrowing costs.
We have available short-term bank credit lines of approximately $167
million and $177 million at December 28, 2002 and December 29, 2001,
respectively. These lines were used to support the general operating needs of
our businesses outside the United States. The weighted-average interest rate for
these lines of credit outstanding at December 28, 2002, and December 29, 2001,
was 8.9% and 4.3%, respectively.
Long-Term Debt and Lease Obligations
Our future minimum commitments for our long-term debt and non-cancellable
capital and operating leases at December 28, 2002 are as follows:
PAYMENTS DUE BY PERIOD
TOTAL 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 THEREAFTER
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ----------
Long-term debt and capital leases .......... $3,528 $ 16 $1,164 $ 3 $ 2 $ 37 $2,306
Operating leases ........................... 177 34 25 19 15 14 70
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
TOTAL LONG-TERM DEBT AND LEASE OBLIGATIONS.. $3,705 $ 50 $1,189 $ 22 $ 17 $ 51 $2,376
====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ======
In addition, at December 28, 2002 we had outstanding letters of credit and
surety bonds valued at $29 million.
29
Capital Expenditures
Our business requires substantial infrastructure investments to maintain
our existing level of operations and to fund investments targeted at growing our
business. Capital infrastructure expenditures totaled $623 million, $593 million
and $515 million during 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
Acquisitions
During 2002 we acquired the operations and exclusive right to manufacture,
sell and distribute Pepsi-Cola beverages of several different PepsiCo franchise
bottlers. The following acquisitions occurred for an aggregate purchase price of
$921 million in cash and $369 million of assumed debt:
- Fruko Mesrubat Sanayii A.S. and related companies of Turkey in
March.
- Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of Aroostook, Inc., of Presque Isle,
Maine in June.
- Seaman's Beverages Limited of the Canadian province of Prince Edward
Island in July.
- Pepsi-Gemex, S.A. de. C.V of Mexico in November.
- Kitchener Beverages Limited of Ontario, Canada in December.
Also in 2002, PBG acquired the Pepsi-Cola bottling operations along with
the exclusive right to manufacture, sell and distribute Pepsi-Cola beverages
from Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of Macon, Inc. in Georgia. In connection with
the acquisition, PBG contributed certain net assets acquired to us totaling $24
million.
The Mexican and Turkish acquisitions were made to allow us to increase our
markets outside the United States. Our U.S. and Canadian acquisitions were made
to enable us to provide better service to our large retail customers. We expect
these acquisitions to reduce costs through economies of scale.
We completed the acquisition of a Pepsi-Cola bottler based in Buffalo, New
York, in the first quarter of 2003. We intend to continue to pursue other
acquisitions of independent PepsiCo bottlers in the U.S. and Canada,
particularly in territories contiguous to our own, where they create shareholder
value. We also intend to continue to evaluate international acquisition
opportunities as they become available.
CASH FLOWS
Fiscal 2002 Compared with Fiscal 2001
Net cash provided by operations increased $34 million to $1,107 million
reflecting strong operating income growth offset by an increase in our pension
contributions.
Net cash used for investments increased by $887 million to $1,836 million
primarily due to the acquisitions we made during the year, coupled with the
investment in our debt defeasance trust and an increase in capital expenditures
as we continue to invest in small bottle production lines and cold drink
equipment.
Net cash provided by financing increased by $850 million to $677 million
driven by proceeds received from our issuance of $1.0 billion of 4 5/8% senior
notes to finance our acquisition of Gemex and decreased distributions to the
owners, offset by a reduction of short and long-term borrowings primarily
outside the United States.
Fiscal 2001 Compared with Fiscal 2000
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $99 million to $1,073
million in 2001, driven by strong operating income growth and the timing of
casualty insurance payments, partially offset by higher pension contribution
payments in 2001.
Net cash used for investments increased by $149 million from $800 million
in 2000 to $949 million in 2001, driven by increased loans made to PBG,
increased capital expenditures and acquisition spending.
Net cash used for financing increased by $131 million to $173 million in
2001. This increase is primarily due to increased distributions to the owners.
30
MARKET RISKS AND CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS
- --------------------------------------
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
In the normal course of business, our financial position is routinely
subject to a variety of risks. These risks include the risk associated with the
price of commodities purchased and used in our business, interest rate on
outstanding debt and currency movements of non-U.S. dollar denominated assets
and liabilities. We are also subject to the risks associated with the business
environment in which we operate, including the collectibility of accounts
receivable. We regularly assess all of these risks and have policies and
procedures in place to protect against the adverse effects of these exposures.
Our objective in managing our exposure to fluctuations in commodity
prices, interest rates, and foreign currency exchange rates is to minimize the
volatility of earnings and cash flows associated with changes in the applicable
rates and prices. To achieve this objective, we primarily enter into commodity
forward contracts, commodity futures and options on futures contracts and
interest rate swaps. Our corporate policy prohibits the use of derivative
instruments for trading or speculative purposes, and we have procedures in place
to monitor and control their use.
A sensitivity analysis has been prepared to determine the effects that
market risk exposures may have on the fair values of our debt and other
financial instruments. To perform the sensitivity analysis, we assessed the risk
of loss in fair values from the hypothetical changes in commodity prices,
interest rates, and foreign currency exchange rates on market-sensitive
instruments. Information provided by this sensitivity analysis does not
necessarily represent the actual changes in fair value that we would incur under
normal market conditions because, due to practical limitations, all variables
other than the specific market risk factor were held constant. In addition, the
results of the analysis are constrained by the fact that certain items are
specifically excluded from the analysis, while the financial instruments that
relate to the financing or hedging of those items are included. As a result, the
reported changes in the values of some financial instruments that affect the
results of the sensitivity analysis are not matched with the offsetting changes
in the values of the items that those instruments are designed to finance or
hedge.
Commodity Price Risk
We are subject to market risks with respect to commodities because our
ability to recover increased costs through higher pricing may be limited by the
competitive environment in which we operate. We use futures contracts and
options on futures in the normal course of business to hedge anticipated
purchases of aluminum and fuel used in our operations. With respect to commodity
price risk, we currently have various contracts outstanding for aluminum and
fuel oil purchases in 2003 and 2004, which establish our purchase prices within
defined ranges. We had $16 million and $19 million in unrealized losses based on
the commodity rates in effect on December 28, 2002, and December 29, 2001,
respectively. We estimate that a 10% decrease in commodity prices with all other
variables held constant would have resulted in a decrease in the fair value of
our financial instruments of $32 million and $15 million at December 28, 2002,
and December 29, 2001, respectively.
Interest Rate Risk
The fair value of our fixed-rate long-term debt is sensitive to changes in
interest rates. Interest rate changes would result in gains or losses in the
fair market value of our debt representing differences between market interest
rates and the fixed rate on the debt. As a result of this market risk, we
effectively converted $1.3 billion of our fixed rate debt to floating rate debt
through the use of interest rate swaps. The change in fair value of the interest
rate swaps resulted in an increase to our hedge and debt instruments of $16
million and $7 million in 2002 and 2001, respectively. We estimate that a 10%
decrease in interest rates with all other variables held constant would have
resulted in an increase in the fair value of our financial instruments, both our
fixed rate debt and our interest rate swaps, of $75 million and $52 million at
December 28, 2002, and December 29, 2001, respectively.
31
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
In 2002, approximately 18% of our net revenues came from outside the
United States. This amount is not indicative of our 2003 results due to our
recent acquisition of Gemex. Accordingly, in 2003 we expect approximately 28% of
our net revenues to come from outside the United States. Social, economic, and
political conditions in these international markets may adversely affect our
results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition. The overall risks to
our international businesses include changes in foreign governmental policies,
and other political or economic developments. These developments may lead to new
product pricing, tax or other policies, and monetary fluctuations, which may
adversely impact our business. In addition, our results of operations and the
value of the foreign assets and liabilities are affected by fluctuations in
foreign currency exchange rates.
As currency exchange rates change, translation of the statements of
operations of our businesses outside the U.S. into U.S. dollars affects
year-over-year comparability. We generally do not hedge against currency risks
because cash flows from our international operations are usually reinvested
locally. In addition, we historically have not entered into hedges to minimize
the volatility of reported earnings. Based on our overall evaluation of market
risk exposures for our foreign currency financial instruments at December 28,
2002, and December 29, 2001, a near term change in foreign currency exchange
rates would not materially affect our consolidated financial position, results
of operations or cash flows in those periods.
Foreign currency gains and losses reflect translation gains and losses
arising from the remeasurement into U.S. dollars of the net monetary assets of
businesses in highly inflationary countries and transaction gains and losses.
Russia and Turkey have been considered highly inflationary economies for
accounting purposes.
Beginning in 2003, Russia will no longer be considered highly
inflationary, and will change its functional currency from the U.S. dollar to
the Russian ruble. We do not expect any material impact on our consolidated
financial statements as a result of Russia's change in functional currency.
Unfunded Deferred Compensation Liability
Participating employees in our deferred compensation program can elect to
defer all or a portion of their compensation to be paid out on a future date or
dates. As part of the deferral process, employees select from phantom investment
options that determine the earnings on the deferred compensation liability and
the amount that they will ultimately receive. Employee investment elections
include PBG stock and a variety of other equity and fixed income investment
options. Our unfunded deferred compensation liability is subject to change in
these investment elections.
Since the plan is unfunded, employees' deferred compensation amounts are
not directly invested in these investment vehicles. Instead, we track the
performance of each employee's investment selections and adjust his or her
deferred compensation account accordingly. The adjustments to the employees'
accounts increases or decreases the deferred compensation liability reflected on
our Consolidated Balance Sheets with an offsetting increase or decrease to our
selling, delivery and administrative expenses.
We use prepaid forward contracts to hedge the portion of our deferred
compensation liability that is based on PBG stock price. Therefore, changes in
compensation expense as a result of changes in PBG stock price are substantially
offset by the changes in the fair value of these contracts. We estimate that a
10% unfavorable change in the year end stock price would have reduced our gains
from these commitments by $2 million in 2002 and $1 million in 2001.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS
Except for the historical information and discussions contained herein,
statements contained in this annual report on Form 10-K may constitute
forward-looking statements as defined by the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are based on currently
available competitive, financial and economic data and our operating plans.
These statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors that
could cause actual results to be materially different. Among the events and
uncertainties that could adversely affect future periods are lower-than-expected
net pricing resulting from marketplace competition, material changes from
expectations in the cost of raw
32
materials and ingredients, an inability to achieve the expected timing for
returns on cold drink equipment and related infrastructure expenditures,
material changes in expected levels of bottler incentive payments from PepsiCo,
material changes in our expected interest and currency exchange rates, an
inability to achieve cost savings, an inability to achieve volume growth through
product and packaging initiatives, competitive pressures that may cause channel
and product mix to shift from more profitable cold drink channels and packages,
weather conditions in our markets, political conditions in our markets outside
the United States and Canada, possible recalls of our products, an inability to
meet projections for performance in newly acquired territories, unfavorable
market performance on our pension plan assets, unfavorable outcomes from our
U.S. Internal Revenue Service audits, and changes in our debt ratings.
33
BOTTLING GROUP, LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
in millions
FISCAL YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 28, 2002, DECEMBER 29, 2001 AND DECEMBER 30, 2000
2002 2001 2000
------- ------- -------
NET REVENUES .................................. $ 9,216 $ 8,443 $ 7,982
Cost of sales ................................. 5,001 4,580 4,405
------- ------- -------
GROSS PROFIT .................................. 4,215 3,863 3,577
Selling, delivery and administrative expenses.. 3,318 3,185 2,986
------- ------- -------
OPERATING INCOME .............................. 897 678 591
Interest expense .............................. 131 132 136
Interest income ............................... 33 54 47
Other non-operating expenses, net ............. 7 -- 1
Minority interest ............................. 9 14 8
------- ------- -------
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES .................... 783 586 493
Income tax expense before rate change ......... 49 24 22
Income tax rate change benefit ................ -- (25) --
------- ------- -------
NET INCOME .................................... $ 734 $ 587 $ 471
======= ======= =======
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
34
BOTTLING GROUP, LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
in millions
FISCAL YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 28, 2002, DECEMBER 29, 2001 AND DECEMBER 30, 2000
2002 2001 2000
------- ------- -------
CASH FLOWS -- OPERATIONS
Net income ................................................... $ 734 $ 587 $ 471
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operations:
Depreciation .............................................. 443 379 340
Amortization .............................................. 8 135 131
Other non-cash charges and credits, net ................... 140 146 145
Changes in operating working capital, excluding
effects of acquisitions:
Accounts receivable .................................... (19) (28) 8
Inventories ............................................ 13 (50) 11
Prepaid expenses and other current assets .............. 27 (29) (102)
Accounts payable and other current liabilities ......... (36) 56 22
------- ------- -------
Net change in operating working capital ............. (15) (51) (61)
------- ------- -------
Pension contributions ..................................... (151) (86) (26)
Other, net ................................................ (52) (37) (26)
------- ------- -------
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATIONS .............................. 1,107 1,073 974
------- ------- -------
CASH FLOWS -- INVESTMENTS
Capital expenditures ......................................... (623) (593) (515)
Acquisitions of bottlers ..................................... (921) (52) (26)
Sales of property, plant and equipment ....................... 6 6 9
Notes receivable from PBG .................................... (117) (310) (268)
Investment in debt defeasance trust .......................... (181) -- --
------- ------- -------
NET CASH USED FOR INVESTMENTS ................................ (1,836) (949) (800)
------- ------- -------
CASH FLOWS -- FINANCING
Short-term borrowings, net -- three months or less ........... (78) 50 12
Proceeds from issuances of long-term debt .................... 1,031 -- --
Payments of long-term debt ................................... (120) -- (9)
Distributions to owners ...................................... (156) (223) (45)
------- ------- -------
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED FOR) FINANCING .................... 677 (173) (42)
------- ------- -------
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS . (8) (7) (4)
------- ------- -------
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS ......... (60) (56) 128
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS -- BEGINNING OF YEAR ............... 262 318 190
------- ------- -------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS -- END OF YEAR ..................... $ 202 $ 262 $ 318
======= ======= =======
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
35
BOTTLING GROUP, LLC
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
in millions
DECEMBER 28, 2002 AND DECEMBER 29, 2001
2002 2001
-------- --------
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents ......................................... $ 202 $ 262
Accounts receivable, less allowance of $67 in 2002 and $42 in 2001 922 823
Inventories ....................................................... 378 331
Prepaid expenses and other current assets ......................... 161 115
-------- --------
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS ........................................... 1,663 1,531
Property, plant and equipment, net ................................ 3,308 2,543
Intangible assets, net ............................................ 4,687 3,684
Notes receivable from PBG ......................................... 954 837
Investment in debt defeasance trust ............................... 170 --
Other assets ...................................................... 125 82
-------- --------
TOTAL ASSETS ................................................... $ 10,907 $ 8,677
======== ========
LIABILITIES AND OWNERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and other current liabilities .................... $ 1,138 $ 977
Short-term borrowings ............................................. 67 77
-------- --------
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES ...................................... 1,205 1,054
Long-term debt .................................................... 3,535 2,299
Other liabilities ................................................. 621 406
Deferred income taxes ............................................. 360 168
Minority interest ................................................. -- 154
-------- --------
TOTAL LIABILITIES .............................................. 5,721 4,081
OWNERS' EQUITY
Owners' net investment ............................................ 5,782 5,012
Accumulated other comprehensive loss .............................. (596) (416)
-------- --------
TOTAL OWNERS' EQUITY ........................................... 5,186 4,596
-------- --------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND OWNERS' EQUITY ........................ $ 10,907 $ 8,677
======== ========
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
36
BOTTLING GROUP, LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN OWNERS' EQUITY
in millions
FISCAL YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 28, 2002, DECEMBER 29, 2001 AND DECEMBER 30, 2000
ACCUMULATED
OWNERS' OTHER
NET COMPREHENSIVE COMPREHENSIVE
INVESTMENT LOSS TOTAL INCOME/(LOSS)
---------- ------------- ------- -------------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 25, 1999 ............. $ 4,150 $ (222) $ 3,928
Comprehensive income:
Net income ......................... 471 -- 471 $ 471
Currency translation adjustment .... -- (31) (31) (31)
----------
Total comprehensive income ............ $ 440
==========
Cash distributions to owners .......... (45) -- (45)
Non-cash distribution to owner ........ (2) -- (2)
------- --------- -------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 30, 2000 ............. 4,574 (253) 4,321
Comprehensive income:
Net income ......................... 587 -- 587 $ 587
Currency translation adjustment .... -- (48) (48) (48)
Minimum pension liability adjustment -- (96) (96) (96)
Cash flow hedge adjustment ......... -- (19) (19) (19)
----------
Total comprehensive income ............ $ 424
==========
Cash distributions to owners........... (223) -- (223)
Non-cash contribution from owner ...... 74 -- 74
------- --------- -------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 29, 2001 ............. 5,012 (416) 4,596
Comprehensive income:
Net income ......................... 734 -- 734 $ 734
Currency translation adjustment .... -- 25 25 25
Minimum pension liability adjustment -- (216) (216) (216)
Cash flow hedge adjustment ......... -- 11 11 11
----------
Total comprehensive income ............ $ 554
==========
Non-cash contribution from owner. ..... 192 -- 192
Cash distributions to owners .......... (156) -- (156)
------- --------- -------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 28, 2002 ............. $ 5,782 $ (596) $ 5,186
======= ========= =======
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
37
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Tabular dollars in millions
NOTE 1 -- BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Bottling Group, LLC (collectively referred to as "Bottling LLC," "we,"
"our" and "us") is the principal operating subsidiary of The Pepsi Bottling
Group, Inc. ("PBG") and consists of substantially all of the operations and
assets of PBG. Bottling LLC, which is consolidated by PBG, consists of bottling
operations located in the United States, Canada, Spain, Greece, Russia, Turkey
and, as a result of our recent acquisition, Mexico.
In conjunction with PBG's initial public offering and other subsequent
transactions, PBG and PepsiCo contributed bottling businesses and assets used in
the bottling businesses to Bottling LLC. As a result of the contribution of
these assets, PBG owns 93.2% of Bottling LLC and PepsiCo owns the remaining 6.8%
as of December 28, 2002.
Certain reclassifications were made in our Consolidated Financial
Statements to 2001 and 2000 amounts to conform to the 2002 presentation.
NOTE 2 -- SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
("U.S. GAAP") requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported
amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
BASIS OF CONSOLIDATION - The accounts of all of our wholly and
majority-owned subsidiaries are included in the accompanying Consolidated
Financial Statements. We have eliminated intercompany accounts and transactions
in consolidation.
FISCAL YEAR - Our fiscal year ends on the last Saturday in December and,
as a result, a 53rd week is added every five or six years. Fiscal years 2002 and
2001 consisted of 52 weeks while fiscal year 2000 consisted of 53 weeks.
REVENUE RECOGNITION - We recognize revenue when our products are delivered
to customers. Sales terms do not allow a right of return unless product
freshness dating has expired.
SALES INCENTIVES - We offer certain sales incentives to our customers,
which are accounted for as a reduction in our net revenues when incurred. A
number of these arrangements are based upon annual and quarterly targets that
generally do not exceed one year. Based upon forecasted volume and other
performance criteria, net revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Operations
are reduced by the expected amounts to be paid out to our customers.
ADVERTISING AND MARKETING COSTS - We are involved in a variety of programs
to promote our products. We include advertising and marketing costs in selling,
delivery and administrative expenses and expense such costs in the fiscal year
incurred. Advertising and marketing costs were $441 million, $389 million and
$350 million in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively, before bottler incentives
received from PepsiCo and other brand owners.
38
BOTTLER INCENTIVES - PepsiCo and other brand owners, at their sole
discretion, provide us with various forms of bottler incentives. These
incentives cover a variety of initiatives, including direct marketplace support,
capital equipment funding and advertising support. Based on the objective of the
programs and initiatives, we record bottler incentives as an adjustment to net
revenues or as a reduction of selling, delivery and administrative expenses.
Direct marketplace support represents PepsiCo's and other brand owners' funding
to assist us in offering sales and promotional discounts to retailers and is
recorded as an adjustment to net revenues. Capital equipment funding is designed
to help offset the costs of purchasing and installing marketing equipment, such
as vending machines and glass door coolers at customer locations and is recorded
as a reduction of selling, delivery and administrative expenses. Advertising
support represents the cost of media time, promotional materials, and other
advertising and marketing costs that are funded by PepsiCo and other brand
owners and is recorded as a reduction to advertising and marketing expenses
within selling, delivery and administrative expenses. In addition, PepsiCo and
other brand owners may share certain media costs with us due to our joint
objective of promoting their brands. There are no conditions or other
requirements that could result in a repayment of the bottler incentives
received. Total bottler incentives received, including media costs shared by
PepsiCo and other brand owners were $604 million, $598 million and $566 million
in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Of these amounts, we recorded $293 million
in both 2002 and 2001 and $277 million in 2000, in net revenues, and the
remainder as a reduction of selling, delivery and administrative expenses.
SHIPPING AND HANDLING COSTS - We record the majority of our shipping and
handling costs within selling, delivery and administrative expenses. Such costs
totaled $1,116 million, $1,058 million and $977 million in 2002, 2001 and 2000,
respectively.
FOREIGN CURRENCY GAINS AND LOSSES - We translate the balance sheets of our
foreign subsidiaries that do not operate in highly inflationary economies at the
exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date, while we translate the
statements of operations at the average rates of exchange during the year. The
resulting translation adjustments of our foreign subsidiaries are recorded
directly to accumulated other comprehensive loss. Foreign currency gains and
losses reflect translation gains and losses arising from the remeasurement into
U.S. dollars of the net monetary assets of businesses in highly inflationary
countries and transaction gains and losses. Turkey and Russia were considered
highly inflationary economies for accounting purposes in 2002.
Beginning in 2003, Russia will no longer be considered highly
inflationary, and will change its functional currency from the U.S. dollar to
the Russian ruble. We do not expect any material impact on our consolidated
financial statements as a result of Russia's change in functional currency in
2003. Turkey is expected to remain highly inflationary for fiscal year 2003.
PENSION AND POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS - We sponsor pension and other
postretirement plans in various forms covering substantially all employees who
meet eligibility requirements. We account for our defined benefit pension plans
and our postretirement benefit plans using actuarial models required by
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 87, "Employers'
Accounting for Pensions," and SFAS No. 106, "Employers' Accounting for
Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions."
The assets, liabilities and assumptions used to measure expense for any
fiscal year are determined as of September 30 of the preceding year
("measurement date"). The discount rate assumption used in our pension and
postretirement benefit plans' accounting is based on current interest rates for
high-quality, long-term corporate debt as determined on each measurement date.
The expected return on plan assets is based on our long-term historical
experience, our plan asset allocation and our expectations for long-term
interest rates and market performance. In evaluating our rate of return on
assets for a given fiscal year, we consider a 15 to 20 year time horizon for our
pension investment portfolio. In addition, we look at the return on asset
assumptions used by other companies in our industry as well as other large
companies. Over the past three fiscal years the composition of our plan assets
was approximately 70%-75% equity investments and 25%-30% fixed income
securities, which primarily consist of U.S. government and corporate bonds.
Differences between actual and which expected returns are generally recognized
in the net periodic pension calculation over five years. To the extent the
amount of all unrecognized gains and losses exceeds 10% of the larger of the
benefit obligation or plan assets, such amount is amortized over the average
remaining
39
service life of active participants. The rate of future compensation increases
is based upon our historical experience and management's best estimate regarding
future expectations. We amortize prior service costs on a straight-line basis
over the average remaining service period of employees expected to receive
benefits.
For our postretirement plans that provide medical and life insurance
benefits, we review external data and our historical health care cost trends
with our actuarial advisors to determine the health care cost trend rates.
INCOME TAXES - We are a limited liability company, taxable as a
partnership for U.S. tax purposes and, as such, generally will pay no U.S.
federal or state income taxes. Our federal and state distributable share of
income, deductions and credits will be allocated to our owners based on their
percentage of ownership. However, certain domestic and foreign affiliates pay
taxes in their respective jurisdictions and record related deferred income tax
assets and liabilities. Deferred income taxes reflect the impact of temporary
differences between assets and liabilities recognized for financial reporting
purposes and such amounts recognized for income tax purposes. In accordance with
SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes," these deferred taxes are measured
by applying currently enacted tax laws. With the exception of certain of our
subsidiaries for which we have recorded deferred taxes in our Consolidated
Financial Statements, deferred taxes associated with our U.S. operations are
recorded directly by our owners.
CASH EQUIVALENTS - Cash equivalents represent funds we have temporarily
invested with original maturities not exceeding three months.
ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS - We determine our allowance for doubtful
accounts based on the evaluation of the aging of our trade receivable portfolio
and a customer-by-customer analysis of our high-risk customers. Our reserves
contemplate our historical loss rate on receivables, specific customer
situations, and the economic environments in which we operate.
INVENTORIES - We value our inventories at the lower of cost computed on
the first-in, first-out method or net realizable value for the majority of our
locations. For our recent acquisitions in Mexico and Turkey, we value
inventories at the lower of cost computed on the weighted-average cost method or
net realizable value.
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT - We state property, plant and equipment
("PP&E") at cost, except for PP&E that has been impaired, for which we write
down the carrying amount to estimated fair market value, which then becomes the
new cost basis.
INTANGIBLE ASSETS - During 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
("FASB") issued SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," which
requires that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives no
longer be amortized, but instead tested for impairment. Effective the first day
of fiscal year 2002, we no longer amortize goodwill and certain franchise
rights, but evaluate them for impairment annually.
Our identifiable intangible assets principally arise from the allocation
of the purchase price of businesses acquired, and consist primarily of franchise
rights. Our franchise rights are typically perpetual in duration, subject to
compliance with the underlying franchise agreement. The value and life of our
franchise rights are directly associated with the underlying portfolio of brands
that we are entitled to make, sell and distribute under applicable franchise
agreements. In considering whether franchise rights have an indefinite useful
life, we consider the nature and terms of the underlying franchise agreements;
our intent and ability to use the franchise rights; and the age and market
position of the products within the franchise as well as the historical and
projected growth of those products. We assign amounts to such identifiable
intangibles based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition.
In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") Issue No. 02-07,
"Unit of Accounting for Testing Impairment of Indefinite-Lived Intangible
Assets," we evaluate our franchise rights with indefinite useful lives for
impairment annually as asset groups on a country-by-country basis ("asset
groups"). We measure the fair value of these asset groups utilizing discounted
estimated future cash flows, including a terminal value, which assumes the
franchise rights will continue in perpetuity. Our
40
long-term terminal growth assumptions reflect our current long-term view of the
marketplace. Our discount rate is based upon our weighted-average cost of
capital plus an additional risk premium to reflect the risk and uncertainty
inherent in separately acquiring a franchise agreement between a willing buyer
and a willing seller. Each year we re-evaluate our assumptions in our discounted
cash flow model to address changes in our business and marketplace conditions.
Based upon our annual impairment analysis, the estimated fair values of our
franchise rights with indefinite lives exceeded their carrying amounts in 2002.
In accordance with SFAS No. 142, we evaluate goodwill on a
country-by-country basis ("reporting unit") for impairment. We evaluate each
reporting unit for impairment based upon a two-step approach. First, we compare
the fair value of our reporting unit with its carrying value. Second, if the
carrying value of our reporting unit exceeds its fair value, we compare the
implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill to its carrying amount to
measure the amount of impairment loss. In measuring the implied fair value of
goodwill, we would allocate the fair value of the reporting unit to each of its
assets and liabilities (including any unrecognized intangible assets). Any
excess of the fair value of the reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its
assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of goodwill.
We measure the fair value of a reporting unit as the discounted estimated
future cash flows, including a terminal value, which assumes the business
continues in perpetuity, less its respective minority interest and net debt (net
of cash and cash equivalents). Our long-term terminal growth assumptions reflect
our current long-term view of the marketplace. Our discount rate is based upon
our weighted-average cost of capital. Each year we re-evaluate our assumptions
in our discounted cash flow model to address changes in our business and
marketplace conditions. Based upon our annual impairment analysis in the fourth
quarter of 2002, the estimated fair value of our reporting units exceeded their
carrying value and as result, we did not proceed to the second step of the
impairment test.
Other identifiable intangible assets that are subject to amortization are
amortized straight-line over the period in which we expect to receive economic
benefit and are reviewed for impairment when facts and circumstances indicate
that the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable. Determining the
expected life of these intangible assets is based on an evaluation of a number
of factors, including the competitive environment, market share and brand
history. If the carrying value is not recoverable, impairment is measured as the
amount by which the carrying value exceeds its estimated fair value. Fair value
is generally estimated based on either appraised value or other valuation
techniques.
INVESTMENT IN DEBT DEFEASANCE TRUST - We have purchased $181 million in
U.S. government securities and placed those securities into an irrevocable
trust, for the sole purpose of funding payments of principal and interest on the
$160 million of 9 3/4% senior notes maturing in March 2004, in order to defease
their respective covenants. These marketable securities have maturities that
coincide with the scheduled interest payments of the senior notes and ultimate
payment of principal. We have categorized these marketable securities as
held-to-maturity as we have the positive intent and ability to hold these
securities to maturity. Held-to-maturity securities are carried at amortized
cost. The total amortized cost for these held-to-maturity securities at December
28, 2002, was $182 million. The current portion of these held-to-maturity
securities is recorded in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the
amount of $12 million, and the remaining long-term portion of $170 million is
recorded in investment in debt defeasance trust in our Consolidated Balance
Sheets.
41
MINORITY INTEREST - Prior to 2002, PBG had a direct minority ownership in
one of our subsidiaries. PBG's share of combined income or loss and assets and
liabilities in the subsidiary is accounted for as minority interest. During
2002, PBG made a capital contribution to us of its ownership in our subsidiary.
As a result, PBG's minority interest was reduced to zero.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND RISK MANAGEMENT - We use derivative instruments
to hedge against the risk associated with the price of commodities purchased and
used in our business, interest rates on outstanding debt and in 2002, certain
currency exposures relating to our acquisition of Pepsi-Gemex, S.A. de C.V.
("Gemex"), a company we acquired in November 2002. Our use of derivative
instruments is limited to interest rate swaps, forward contracts, futures and
options on futures contracts. Our corporate policy prohibits the use of
derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes, and we have
procedures in place to monitor and control their use.
All derivative instruments are recorded at fair value as either assets or
liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Derivative instruments are
generally designated and accounted for as either a hedge of a recognized asset
or liability ("fair value hedge") or a hedge of a forecasted transaction ("cash
flow hedge").
For a fair value hedge, both the effective and ineffective portions of the
change in fair value of the derivative instrument, along with an adjustment to
the carrying amount of the hedged item for fair value changes attributable to
the hedged risk, are recognized in earnings. For derivative instruments that
hedge interest rate risk, the fair value adjustments are recorded to interest
expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
For a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of changes in the fair value
of the derivative instrument that are highly effective are deferred in
accumulated other comprehensive loss until the underlying hedged item is
recognized in earnings. The applicable gain or loss is recognized in earnings
immediately and is recorded consistent with the expense classification of the
underlying hedged item.
The ineffective portion of fair value changes on qualifying cash flow
hedges is recognized in earnings immediately and is recorded consistent with the
expense classification of the underlying hedged item. If a fair value or cash
flow hedge were to cease to qualify for hedge accounting or be terminated, it
would continue to be carried on the balance sheet at fair value until settled,
but hedge accounting would be discontinued prospectively. If a forecasted
transaction were no longer probable of occurring, amounts previously deferred in
accumulated other comprehensive loss would be recognized immediately in
earnings.
On occasion, we enter into derivative instruments that do not qualify for
hedge accounting. These instruments are reflected in the Consolidated Balance
Sheets at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings.
We also may enter into certain derivative instruments for which hedge
accounting is not required because it is entered into to offset changes in the
fair value of an underlying transaction recognized in earnings ("natural
hedge"). These instruments are reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at
fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings.
STOCK-BASED EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION - We measure PBG stock-based
compensation expense using the intrinsic value method in accordance with
Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees," and its related interpretations. Accordingly, compensation expense
for PBG stock option grants to our employees is measured as the excess of the
quoted market price of PBG's common stock at the grant date over the amount the
employee must pay for the stock. Our policy is to grant PBG stock options at
fair value on the date of grant. As allowed by SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure", we have elected to continue
to apply the intrinsic value-based method of accounting described above, and
have adopted the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation."
42
If we had measured compensation cost for the stock options granted to our
employees under the fair value based method prescribed by SFAS No. 123, net
income would have been changed to the pro forma amounts set forth below:
2002 2001 2000
----- ----- -----
Net Income
Reported ....................................................... $ 734 $ 587 $ 471
Less: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined
under fair value based method for all awards, net of taxes (70) (64) (46)
----- ----- -----
Pro forma ...................................................... $ 664 $ 523 $ 425
===== ===== =====
Pro forma compensation cost measured for stock options granted to
employees is amortized straight-line over the vesting period, which is typically
three years.
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES - We are subject to various claims and
contingencies related to lawsuits, taxes, environmental and other matters
arising out of the normal course of business. Liabilities related to commitments
and contingencies are recognized when a loss is probable and reasonably
estimable.
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS - During 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141,
"Business Combinations," which requires that the purchase method of accounting
be used for all business combinations initiated or completed after June 30,
2001, and SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," which requires
that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives no longer be
amortized, but instead tested for impairment. Effective the first day of fiscal
year 2002 we no longer amortize goodwill and certain franchise rights, but
evaluate them for impairment annually. We have completed our annual impairment
review and have determined that our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible
assets are not impaired. The following table provides pro forma disclosure of
the elimination of goodwill and certain franchise rights amortization in 2001
and 2000, as if SFAS No. 142 had been adopted in 2000:
2002 2001 2000
------ ------ ------
Reported net income................................................ $ 734 $ 587 $ 471
Add back: Goodwill amortization ................................ -- 35 37
Add back: Franchise rights amortization ........................ -- 88 86
------ ------ ------
Adjusted net income................................................ $ 734 $ 710 $ 594
======= ====== ======
During 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset
Retirement Obligations." SFAS No. 143 addresses financial accounting and
reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived
assets and the associated asset retirement costs. It requires that we recognize
the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period
in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. SFAS
No. 143 is effective for fiscal year 2003. We do not anticipate that the
adoption of SFAS No. 143 will have a material impact on our Consolidated
Financial Statements.
During 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment
or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets." SFAS No. 144 establishes a single accounting
model for the impairment of long-lived assets and broadens the presentation of
discontinued operations to include more disposal transactions. We adopted SFAS
No. 144 at the beginning of fiscal year 2002. The adoption of SFAS No. 144 did
not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
During 2001, the EITF issued EITF Issue No. 01-09, "Accounting for
Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer or Reseller of the Vendor's
Products," which addresses the recognition of income statement and
classification of various sales incentives. We adopted EITF Issue No. 01-09 at
the beginning of fiscal 2002 and it did not have a material impact on our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
During 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs
Associated with the Exit or Disposal Activities." SFAS No. 146 is effective for
exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. We do not
anticipate that the adoption of SFAS No. 146 will have a material impact on our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
43
During 2002 the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation-Transition and Disclosure," which amends SFAS No. 123, "Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation." SFAS No. 148 provides alternative methods of
transition for a voluntary change to the fair value method of accounting for
stock-based employee compensation. In addition, this statement requires SFAS No.
123 disclosure requirements in both annual and interim financial statements. We
will continue to measure stock-based compensation expense in accordance with APB
Opinion 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and its related
interpretations, and therefore we do not anticipate that the adoption of SFAS
No. 148 will have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
During 2002, the EITF addressed various issues related to the income
statement classification of certain payments received by a customer from a
vendor. In November 2002, the EITF reached a consensus on Issue No. 02-16,
"Accounting by a Reseller for Cash Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer
(Including a Reseller of the Vendor's Products)," addressing the recognition and
income statement classification of various consideration given by a vendor to a
customer. Among its requirements, the consensus requires that certain cash
consideration received by a customer from a vendor is presumed to be a reduction
of the price of the vendor's products, and therefore should be characterized as
a reduction of cost of sales when recognized in the customer's income statement,
unless certain criteria are met. EITF Issue No. 02-16 will be effective
beginning in our fiscal year 2003. We currently classify bottler incentives
received from PepsiCo and other brand owners as adjustments to net revenues and
selling, delivery and administrative expenses. In accordance with EITF Issue No.
02-16, we will classify certain bottler incentives as a reduction of cost of
sales beginning in 2003. We are currently assessing the transitional guidance
released by the EITF to determine the net impact to our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
NOTE 3 -- INVENTORIES
2002 2001
----- -----
Raw materials and supplies.................. $ 162 $ 117
Finished goods.............................. 216 214
----- -----
$ 378 $ 331
===== =====
NOTE 4 -- PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET
2002 2001
------- -------
Land........................................ $ 228 $ 145
Buildings and improvements.................. 1,126 925
Manufacturing and distribution equipment.... 2,768 2,308
Marketing equipment......................... 2,008 1,846
Other....................................... 154 121
------- -------
6,284 5,345
Accumulated depreciation.................... (2,976) (2,802)
------- --------
$ 3,308 $ 2,543
======= =======
44
We calculate depreciation on a straight-line basis over the estimated lives of
the assets as follows:
Buildings and improvements.... 20-33 years
Manufacturing equipment....... 15 years
Distribution equipment........ 2-10 years
Marketing equipment........... 3-7 years
NOTE 5 -- INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET
2002 2001
------- -------
Intangibles subject to amortization:
Gross carrying amount:
Franchise rights ....................................... $ 20 $ 12
Other identifiable intangibles ......................... 24 39
------- -------
44 51
------- -------
Accumulated amortization:
Franchise rights ....................................... (6) (2)
Other identifiable intangibles ......................... (9) (25)
------- -------
(15) (27)
------- -------
Intangibles subject to amortization
(less accumulated amortization)....................... 29 24
------- -------
Intangibles not subject to amortization:
Carrying amount:
Franchise rights ....................................... 3,424 2,577
Goodwill ............................................... 1,192 1,046
Other identifiable intangibles ......................... 42 37
------- -------
Intangibles not subject to amortization ................ 4,658 3,660
------- -------
Total Intangible Assets (less accumulated amortization) ... $ 4,687 $ 3,684
======= =======
For intangible assets subject to amortization, we calculate amortization
on a straight-line basis over the period we expect to receive economic benefit.
Total amortization expense was $8 million, $135 million and $131 million in
2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The weighted-average amortization period for
each class of intangible assets and their estimated aggregate amortization
expense expected to be recognized over the next five years are as follows:
Weighted-Average Estimated Aggregate Amortization Expense
Amortization to be Incurred
Period ------------------------------------------
---------------- 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Franchise rights .................. 5 years $4 $4 $4 $2 $-
Other identifiable intangibles .... 7 years $4 $4 $3 $2 $1
Through our various current and prior year acquisitions we accumulated
$146 million of goodwill during 2002.
NOTE 6 -- ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES
2002 2001
------ -----
Accounts payable.............................................. $ 394 $ 362
Trade incentives.............................................. 210 205
Accrued compensation and benefits............................. 181 141
Other accrued taxes........................................... 57 30
Other current liabilities..................................... 296 239
------ -----
$1,138 $ 977
====== =====
45
NOTE 7 -- SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS AND LONG-TERM DEBT
2002 2001
------ ------
Short-term borrowings
Current maturities of long-term debt ...................... $ 16 $ 3
Other short-term borrowings ............................... 51 74
------ ------
$ 67 $ 77
====== ======
Long-term debt
5 5/8% senior notes due 2009 .............................. $1,300 $1,300
5 3/8% senior notes due 2004 .............................. 1,000 1,000
4 5/8% senior notes due 2012 .............................. 1,000 --
9 3/4% senior notes due 2004 .............................. 160 --
Other (average rate 3.5%) ................................. 68 11
------ ------
3,528 2,311
Add: SFAS No. 133 adjustment * ........................... 23 7
Fair value adjustment relating to purchase accounting 14 --
Less: Unamortized discount, net ........................... 14 16
Current maturities of long-term debt ................ 16 3
------ ------
$3,535 $2,299
====== ======
* In accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 133, the portion of our
fixed-rate debt obligations that is hedged is reflected in our
Consolidated Balance Sheets as an amount equal to the sum of the debt's
carrying value plus a SFAS No. 133 fair value adjustment representing
changes recorded in the fair value of the hedged debt obligations
attributable to movements in market interest rates.
Maturities of long-term debt as of December 28, 2002, are 2003: $16
million, 2004: $1,164 million, 2005: $3 million, 2006: $2 million, 2007: $37
million and thereafter, $2,306 million.
The $1.3 billion of 5 5/8% senior notes (with an effective interest rate
of 5.6%) and the $1.0 billion of 5 3/8% senior notes (with an effective interest
rate of 4.5%) were issued on February 9, 1999, by Bottling LLC and they are
guaranteed by PepsiCo.
The $1.0 billion of 4 5/8% senior notes (with an effective interest rate
of 4.6%) was issued on November 15, 2002, by Bottling LLC and will be guaranteed
by PepsiCo, in accordance with the terms set forth in the related indenture.
Each of the senior notes mentioned above has redemption features,
covenants and will, among other things, limit our ability and the ability of our
restricted subsidiaries to create or assume liens, enter into sale and
lease-back transactions, engage in mergers or consolidations and transfer or
lease all or substantially all of our assets.
The $160 million of 9 3/4% senior notes were issued by Gemex. These senior
notes have an effective interest rate of 3.7% after a fair value adjustment of
$14 million resulting from our acquisition of Gemex. In December 2002, we
purchased $181 million of U.S. government securities and placed those securities
into an irrevocable trust, for the sole purpose of funding payments of principal
and interest on the $160 million of 9 3/4% senior notes maturing in March 2004,
in order to defease its respective covenants. We estimate that the U.S.
government securities will be sufficient to satisfy all future principal and
interest requirements of the senior notes. See Note 2.
We have available short-term bank credit lines of approximately $167
million and $177 million at December 28, 2002, and December 29, 2001,
respectively. These lines were used to support the general operating needs of
our businesses outside the United States. The weighted-average interest rate for
these lines of credit outstanding at December 28, 2002, and December 29, 2001,
was 8.9% and 4.3%, respectively.
Amounts paid to third parties for interest were $126 million, $121 million
and $131 million in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
46
NOTE 8 -- COMMITMENTS
We have noncancellable commitments under both capital and long-term
operating leases, which consist principally of buildings, office equipment and
machinery. Capital and operating lease commitments expire at various dates
through 2021. Most leases require payment of related executory costs, which
include property taxes, maintenance and insurance.
Our future minimum commitments under noncancellable leases are set forth
below:
LEASES
--------------------
CAPITAL OPERATING
------- ---------
2003........... $ 1 $ 34
2004........... 1 25
2005........... -- 19
2006........... -- 15
2007........... -- 14
Later years.... 3 70
------- ---------
$ 5 $177
======= =========
In addition, at December 28, 2002 we have outstanding letters of credit
and surety bonds valued at $29 million primarily to provide collateral for
estimated self insurance claims and other insurance requirements.
At December 28, 2002, the present value of minimum payments under capital
leases was $3 million, after deducting $2 million for imputed interest. Our
rental expense was $62 million, $40 million and $42 million for 2002, 2001 and
2000, respectively.
NOTE 9 -- FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND RISK MANAGEMENT
These Consolidated Financial Statements reflect the implementation of SFAS
No. 133, as amended by SFAS No. 138, on the first day of fiscal year 2001. In
June 1998, the FASB issued SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities." This statement establishes accounting and reporting
standards for hedging activities and derivative instruments, including certain
derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, which are collectively
referred to as derivatives. It requires that an entity recognize all derivatives
as either assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet and measure
those instruments at fair value. In June 2000, the FASB issued SFAS No. 138,
amending the accounting and reporting standards of SFAS No. 133. Prior to the
adoption of SFAS No. 133, there were no deferred gains or losses from our
hedging activities recorded in our Consolidated Financial Statements. The
adoption of these statements resulted in the recording of a deferred gain in our
Consolidated Balance Sheets, which was recorded as an increase to current assets
of $4 million and a reduction of accumulated other comprehensive loss of $4
million. Furthermore, the adoption had no impact on our Consolidated Statements
of Operations.
As of December 28, 2002, our use of derivative instruments is limited to
interest rate swaps, forward contracts, futures and options on futures
contracts. Our corporate policy prohibits the use of derivative instruments for
trading or speculative purposes, and we have procedures in place to monitor and
control their use.
CASH FLOW HEDGES - We are subject to market risk with respect to the cost
of commodities because our ability to recover increased costs through higher
pricing may be limited by the competitive environment in which we operate. We
use future and option contracts to hedge the risk of adverse movements in
commodity prices related to anticipated purchases of aluminum and fuel used in
our operations. These contracts, which generally range from one to 12 months in
duration, establish our commodity purchase prices within defined ranges in an
attempt to limit our purchase price risk resulting from adverse commodity price
movements and are designated as and qualify for cash flow hedge accounting
treatment.
The amount of deferred losses from our commodity hedging that we
recognized into cost of sales in our Consolidated Statements of Operations was
$22 million in 2002 and $4 million for 2001. As a result of our commodity
hedges, $16 million and $19 million of deferred losses remained in accumulated
other
47
comprehensive loss in our Consolidated Balance Sheets based on the commodity
rates in effect on December 28, 2002, and December 29, 2001, respectively.
Assuming no change in the commodity prices as measured on December 28, 2002, $13
million of the deferred loss will be recognized in our cost of sales over the
next 12 months. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of these
contracts was not material to our results of operations in 2002 or 2001.
On November 15, 2002, we issued a $1 billion 10 year bond with an interest
rate of 4 5/8 %. In anticipation of the bond issuance, we entered into several
treasury rate future contracts to hedge against adverse interest rate changes.
We recognized $8 million as a deferred gain reported in accumulated other
comprehensive loss resulting from these treasury rate contracts. These deferred
gains are released to match the underlying interest expense on the debt.
Deferred gains of $0.7 million will be recognized in interest expense over the
next 12 months.
FAIR VALUE HEDGES - We finance a portion of our operations through
fixed-rate debt instruments. We converted our entire $1.0 billion 5 3/8% senior
notes and $300 million of our $1.3 billion 5 5/8% senior notes to floating rate
debt through the use of interest rate swaps with the objective of reducing our
overall borrowing costs. These interest rate swaps meet the criteria for fair
value hedge accounting and are 100% effective in eliminating the market rate
risk inherent in our long-term debt. Accordingly, any gain or loss associated
with these swaps are fully offset by the opposite market impact on the related
debt. The change in fair value of the interest rate swaps was a gain of $16
million in 2002 and a gain of $7 million in 2001. The fair value change was
recorded in interest expense in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and in
prepaid expenses and other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. An
offsetting adjustment was recorded in interest expense in our Consolidated
Statements of Operations and in long-term debt in our Consolidated Balance
Sheets representing the change in fair value of the related long-term debt.
UNFUNDED DEFERRED COMPENSATION LIABILITY - Participating employees in our
deferred compensation program can elect to defer all or a portion of their
compensation to be paid out on a future date or dates. As part of the deferral
process, employees select from phantom investment options that determine the
earnings on the deferred compensation liability and the amount that they will
ultimately receive. Employee investment elections include PBG stock and a
variety of other equity and fixed income investment options. Our unfunded
deferred compensation liability is subject to change in these investment
elections.
Since the plan is unfunded, employees' deferred compensation amounts are
not directly invested in these investment vehicles. Instead, we track the
performance of each employee's investment selections and adjust his or her
deferred compensation account accordingly. The adjustments to the employees'
accounts increases or decreases the deferred compensation liability reflected on
our Consolidated Balance Sheets with an offsetting increase or decrease to our
selling, delivery and administrative expenses.
We use prepaid forward contracts to hedge the portion of our deferred
compensation liability that is based on PBG's stock price. At December 28, 2002,
we had a prepaid forward contract for 638,000 shares at an exercise price of
$28.50, which was accounted for as a natural hedge. This contract requires cash
settlement and has a fair value at December 28, 2002, of $16 million recorded in
prepaid expenses and other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The fair value of this contract changes based on the change in PBG's stock price
compared with the contract exercise price. We recognized $1 million in gains in
2002 and $2 million in gains in 2001, resulting from the change in fair value of
these prepaid forward contracts. The earnings impact from these instruments are
classified as selling, delivery and administrative expenses.
OTHER DERIVATIVES - During 2002, we entered into option contracts to
mitigate certain foreign currency risks in anticipation of our acquisition of
Gemex. Although these instruments did not qualify for hedge accounting, they
were deemed derivatives since they contained a net settlement clause. These
options expired unexercised and the cost of these options of $7 million has been
recorded in other non-operating expenses, net in our Consolidated Statements of
Operations.
OTHER FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - Financial assets with carrying
values approximating fair
48
value include cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. Financial
liabilities with carrying values approximating fair value include accounts
payable and other accrued liabilities and short-term debt. The carrying value of
these financial assets and liabilities approximates fair value due to the short
maturities and since interest rates approximate current market rates for
short-term debt.
Long-term debt at December 28, 2002, had a carrying value and fair value
of $3.5 billion and $3.7 billion, respectively, and at December 29, 2001, had a
carrying value and fair value of $2.3 billion. The fair value is based on
interest rates that are currently available to us for issuance of debt with
similar terms and remaining maturities.
NOTE 10 -- PENSION AND POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS
PENSION BENEFITS
Our U.S. employees participate in noncontributory defined benefit pension
plans, which cover substantially all full-time salaried employees, as well as
most hourly employees. Benefits generally are based on years of service and
compensation, or stated amounts for each year of service. All of our qualified
plans are funded and contributions are made in amounts not less than minimum
statutory funding requirements and not more than the maximum amount that can be
deducted for U.S. income tax purposes. Our net pension expense for the defined
benefit plans for our operations outside the U.S. was not significant.
Our U.S. employees are also eligible to participate in our 401(k) savings
plans, which are voluntary defined contribution plans. We make matching
contributions to the 401(k) savings plans on behalf of participants eligible to
receive such contributions. If a participant has one or more but less than 10
years of eligible service, our match will equal $0.50 for each dollar the
participant elects to defer up to 4% of the participant's pay. If the
participant has 10 or more years of eligible service, our match will equal $1.00
for each dollar the participant elects to defer up to 4% of the participant's
pay.
PENSION
-------------------------
Components of pension expense: 2002 2001 2000
------- ------ ------
Service cost ........................................ $ 28 $ 25 $ 24
Interest cost ....................................... 56 50 49
Expected return on plan assets ...................... (66) (57) (53)
Amortization of prior service amendments ............ 6 4 5
Special termination benefits ........................ 1 -- --
------- ------ ------
Net pension expense for the defined benefit plans ... $ 25 $ 22 $ 25
------- ------ ------
Cost of defined contribution plans .................. $ 18 $ 17 $ 15
------- ------ ------
Total net pension expense recognized in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations ............... $ 43 $ 39 $ 40
======= ====== ======
POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
Our postretirement plans provide medical and life insurance benefits
principally to U.S. retirees and their dependents. Employees are eligible for
benefits if they meet age and service requirements and qualify for retirement
benefits. The plans are not funded and since 1993 have included retiree cost
sharing.
POSTRETIREMENT
------------------------
Components of postretirement benefits expense: 2002 2001 2000
------ ------ ------
Service cost ...................................... $ 3 $ 3 $ 3
Interest cost ..................................... 17 16 14
Amortization of net loss .......................... 2 1 1
Amortization of prior service amendments .......... (6) (6) (6)
---- ---- ----
Net postretirement benefits expense recognized in
the Consolidated Statements of Operations ......... $ 16 $ 14 $ 12
==== ==== ====
49
CHANGES IN THE BENEFIT OBLIGATION
PENSION POSTRETIREMENT
---------------- -----------------
2002 2001 2002 2001
------ ------ ------- ------
Obligation at beginning of year.... $ 760 $ 664 $ 228 $ 212
Service cost....................... 28 25 3 3
Interest cost...................... 56 50 17 16
Plan amendments.................... 22 10 -- --
Actuarial loss..................... 127 48 55 14
Benefit payments................... (41) (37) (17) (17)
Special termination benefits....... 1 -- -- --
------ ------ ------- ------
Obligation at end of year.......... $ 953 $ 760 $ 286 $ 228
====== ====== ======= ======
CHANGES IN THE FAIR VALUE OF ASSETS
PENSION POSTRETIREMENT
---------------- -----------------
2002 2001 2002 2001
------ ------ ------- ------
Fair value at beginning of year.... $ 578 $ 665 $ -- $ --
Actual return on plan assets....... (61) (120) -- --
Asset transfers.................... 11 -- -- --
Employer contributions............. 51 70 17 17
Benefit payments................... (41) (37) (17) (17)
------ ------ ------- ------
Fair value at end of year.......... $ 538 $ 578 $ -- $ --
====== ====== ======= ======
SELECTED INFORMATION FOR THE PLANS WITH ACCUMULATED BENEFIT OBLIGATIONS IN
EXCESS OF PLAN ASSETS
PENSION POSTRETIREMENT
---------------- -----------------
2002 2001 2002 2001
------ ------ ------- ------
Projected benefit obligation....... $953 $ 760 $286 $228
Accumulated benefit obligation..... 843 690 286 228
Fair value of plan assets *........ 663 604 -- --
*Includes fourth quarter employer contributions.
FUNDED STATUS RECOGNIZED ON THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
PENSION POSTRETIREMENT
---------------- -----------------
2002 2001 2002 2001
------ ------ ------- ------
Funded status at end of year......... $(415) $(182) $(286) $(228)
Unrecognized prior service cost...... 41 36 (9) (16)
Unrecognized loss.................... 407 153 110 57
Unrecognized transition asset........ -- (1) -- --
Fourth quarter employer contributions 125 26 6 5
------ ------ ------ ------
Net amounts recognized............... $ 158 $ 32 $(179) $(182)
====== ====== ====== ======
NET AMOUNTS RECOGNIZED IN THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
PENSION POSTRETIREMENT
---------------- -----------------
2002 2001 2002 2001
------ ------ ------- ------
Other liabilities................... $(196) $(101) $(179) $(182)
Intangible assets................... 42 37 -- --
Accumulated other comprehensive loss 312 96 -- --
------ ------ ------- ------
Net amounts recognized.............. $ 158 $ 32 $(179) $(182)
====== ====== ======= ======
50
At December 28, 2002, and December 29, 2001, the accumulated benefit
obligation of certain PBG pension plans exceeded the fair market value of the
plan assets resulting in the recognition of the unfunded liability as a minimum
balance sheet liability. As a result of this additional liability, our
intangible asset increased by $5 million to $42 million in 2002, which equals
the amount of unrecognized prior service cost in our plans. The remainder of the
liability that exceeded the unrecognized prior service cost was recognized as an
increase to accumulated other comprehensive loss of $216 million and $96 million
in 2002 and 2001, respectively.
ASSUMPTIONS
The weighted-average assumptions used to compute the above information are
set forth below:
PENSION
-------
2002 2001 2000
------ ------ ------
Discount rate for benefit obligation.... 6.8% 7.5% 7.8%
Expected return on plan assets (1)...... 9.5% 9.5% 9.5%
Rate of compensation increase........... 4.3% 4.3% 4.6%
(1) Expected return on plan assets is presented after administration expenses.
POSTRETIREMENT
--------------
2002 2001 2000
------ ------ ------
Discount rate for benefit obligation.... 6.8% 7.5% 7.8%
We evaluate these assumptions with our actuarial advisors on an annual
basis and we believe they are within accepted industry ranges, although an
increase or decrease in the assumptions or economic events outside our control
could have a direct impact on reported net earnings.
FUNDING AND PLAN ASSETS
The pension plan assets are principally invested in stocks and bonds. None
of the assets are invested directly into PBG, PepsiCo or any bottling affiliates
of PepsiCo, although it is possible that insignificant indirect investments
exist through our broad market indices. Our contributions are made in accordance
with applicable tax regulations that provide for current tax deductions for our
contributions and for taxation to the employee of plan benefits when the
benefits are received. We do not fund our pension plan and postretirement plans
when our contributions would not be deductible and when benefits would be
taxable to the employee before receipt. Of the total pension liabilities at year
end 2002, $52 million relates to plans not funded due to these unfavorable tax
consequences.
HEALTH CARE COST TREND RATES
We have assumed an average increase of 12.0% in 2003 in the cost of
postretirement medical benefits for employees who retired before cost sharing
was introduced. This average increase is then projected to decline gradually to
5.0% in 2013 and thereafter.
Assumed health care cost trend rates have an impact on the amounts
reported for postretirement medical plans. A one-percentage point change in
assumed health care costs would have the following effects:
1% 1%
INCREASE DECREASE
-------- --------
Effect on total fiscal year 2002 service and interest cost components........... $ - $ -
Effect on the fiscal year 2002 accumulated postretirement benefit obligation.... $10 $ (8)
51
NOTE 11 -- EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION PLANS
Under PBG's long-term incentive plan, PBG stock options are issued to our
middle and senior management employees and vary according to salary and level.
Except as noted below, options granted in 2002, 2001 and 2000 had exercise
prices ranging from $23.25 per share to $29.25 per share, $18.88 per share to
$22.50 per share, and $9.38 per share to $15.88 per share, respectively, expire
in 10 years and generally become exercisable 25% after one year, an additional
25% after two years, and the remainder after three years.
In 2001, two additional option grants were made to certain senior
management employees. One grant had an exercise price of $19.50 per share,
expires in 10 years and became exercisable on the grant date. The other grant
had an exercise price of $22.50 per share, expires in 10 years and becomes
exercisable in 5 years.
The following table summarizes option activity during 2002:
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE
OPTIONS EXERCISE PRICE
------- ----------------
Options in millions
Outstanding at beginning of year.................................. 39.7 $13.20
Granted........................................................ 6.4 25.32
Exercised...................................................... (8.1) 11.63
Forfeited...................................................... (0.6) 16.89
------- -------
Outstanding at end of year........................................ 37.4 $15.53
======= =======
Exercisable at end of year........................................ 19.9 $12.59
======= =======
Weighted-average fair value of options granted ................... $10.89
=======
The following table summarizes option activity during 2001:
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE
OPTIONS EXERCISE PRICE
------- ----------------
Options in millions
Outstanding at beginning of year.................................. 33.2 $10.75
Granted........................................................ 10.2 20.47
Exercised...................................................... (1.8) 10.84
Forfeited...................................................... (1.9) 12.01
------- -------
Outstanding at end of year........................................ 39.7 $13.20
======= =======
Exercisable at end of year........................................ 6.6 $13.38
======= =======
Weighted-average fair value of options granted ................... $ 8.55
=======
52
The following table summarizes option activity during 2000:
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE
Options in millions OPTIONS EXERCISE PRICE
------- ----------------
Outstanding at beginning of year.................................. 22.4 $11.49
Granted........................................................ 13.2 9.57
Exercised...................................................... (0.2) 10.53
Forfeited...................................................... (2.2) 11.20
------- -------
Outstanding at end of year........................................ 33.2 $10.75
======= =======
Exercisable at end of year........................................ 1.8 $11.11
======= =======
Weighted-average fair value of options granted ................... $ 4.68
=======
Stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 28, 2002:
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING OPTIONS EXERCISABLE
------------------------------------- --------------------
WEIGHTED-
AVERAGE
REMAINING WEIGHTED- WEIGHTED-
Options in millions CONTRACTUAL AVERAGE AVERAGE
LIFE IN EXERCISE EXERCISE
RANGE OF EXERCISE PRICE OPTIONS YEARS PRICE OPTIONS PRICE
- ----------------------- ------- ----------- --------- ------- --------
$9.38-$11.49 ...................... 8.9 6.99 $ 9.39 7.0 $10.38
$11.50-$15.88 ..................... 13.2 6.06 $11.63 9.6 $11.61
$15.89-$22.50 ..................... 9.1 8.00 $20.49 3.2 $20.04
$22.51-$29.25 ..................... 6.2 9.00 $25.34 0.1 $25.16
------- ----------- --------- ------- --------
37.4 7.24 $15.53 19.9 $12.59
======= =========== ========= ======= ========
The fair value of PBG stock options used to compute pro forma net income
disclosures was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model based on the following weighted-average assumptions:
2002 2001 2000
------- ------- -------
Risk-free interest rate..... 4.5% 4.6% 6.7%
Expected life............... 6 years 6 years 7 years
Expected volatility......... 37% 35% 35%
Expected dividend yield..... 0.16% 0.20% 0.43%
NOTE 12 -- INCOME TAXES
We are a limited liability company, taxable as a partnership for U.S. tax
purposes and, as such, generally pay no U.S. federal or state income taxes. Our
federal and state distributable share of income, deductions and credits are
allocated to our owners based on their percentage of ownership. However, certain
domestic and foreign affiliates pay income taxes in their respective
jurisdictions. We had income tax expense of $49 million in 2002, an income tax
benefit of $1 million in 2001 and income tax expense of $22 million in 2000.
These amounts were comprised of current income tax expense of $12 million, $8
million and $27 million, and deferred income tax expense of $37 million in 2002
and deferred income tax benefit of $9 million and $5 million in 2001 and 2000,
respectively.
Our 2001 deferred income tax benefit includes a nonrecurring benefit of
$25 million due to enacted tax rate changes in Canada during the year.
Our reconciliation of income taxes calculated at the U.S. federal
statutory rate to our provision for income taxes is set forth below:
53
2002 2001 2000
------ ------ ------
Income taxes computed at the U.S. federal statutory rate... 35.0% 35.0% 35.0%
Transfer of income to owners............................... (26.4) (28.5) (27.5)
State income tax, net of federal tax benefit............... 0.6 0.4 0.9
Impact of foreign results.................................. (4.8) (8.5) (8.6)
Goodwill and other nondeductible expenses.................. 0.8 2.7 3.7
Other, net................................................. 1.2 3.0 0.9
------ ------ ------
6.4 4.1 4.4
Rate change benefit........................................ -- (4.3) --
------ ------ ------
Total effective income tax rate............................ 6.4% (0.2)% 4.4%
====== ====== ======
The details of our 2002 and 2001 deferred tax liabilities (assets) are set
forth below:
2002 2001
------ ------
Intangible assets and property, plant and equipment................. $ 370 $ 175
Other............................................................... 30 36
------ ------
Gross deferred tax liabilities...................................... 400 211
------ ------
Net operating loss carryforwards.................................... (142) (121)
Various liabilities and other....................................... (63) (49)
------ ------
Gross deferred tax assets........................................... (205) (170)
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance.............................. 147 122
------ ------
Net deferred tax assets............................................. (58) (48)
------ ------
Net deferred tax liability.......................................... $ 342 $ 163
====== ======
Included in:
Prepaid expenses and other current assets........................... $ (18) $ (5)
Deferred income taxes............................................... 360 168
------ ------
$ 342 $ 163
====== ======
We have net operating loss carryforwards totaling $443 million at December
28, 2002, which are available to reduce future taxes in the U.S., Spain, Greece,
Russia, Turkey and Mexico. Of these carryforwards, $14 million expire in 2003
and $429 million expire at various times between 2004 and 2022. We have
established a full valuation allowance for the net operating loss carryforwards
attributable to Spain, Greece, Russia, Turkey and Mexico based upon our
projection that it is more likely than not that these losses will not be
realized. In addition, at December 28, 2002, we have a tax credit carryforwards
in the U.S. of $7 million with an indefinite carryforward period and in Mexico
of $13 million, which expire at various times between 2006 and 2012.
Our valuation allowances, which reduce deferred tax assets to an amount
that will more likely than not be realized, have increased by $25 million and
decreased by $26 million in 2002 and 2001, respectively. The increase in 2002
was mainly due to the purchase of bottling companies in Turkey and Mexico.
Deferred taxes are not recognized for temporary differences related to
investments in foreign subsidiaries that are essentially permanent in duration.
Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred taxes related to these
investments is not practicable.
Income taxes payable were $8 million at December 28, 2002 and income taxes
receivable were $10 million at December 29, 2001. Such amounts are recorded
within accounts payable and other current liabilities and prepaid expenses and
other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets, respectively. Amounts
paid to taxing authorities for income taxes were $0, $11 million and $34 million
in 2002, 2001 and 2000 respectively.
54
NOTE 13 -- GEOGRAPHIC DATA
We operate in one industry, carbonated soft drinks and other
ready-to-drink beverages. We conduct business in 41 states and the District of
Columbia in the United States. Outside the U.S., we conduct business in Canada,
Spain, Russia, Greece, Turkey and Mexico.
NET REVENUES
----------------------------
2002 2001 2000
------ ------ ------
U.S........................................................ $7,572 $7,197 $6,830
Mexico..................................................... 164 -- --
Other countries............................................ 1,480 1,246 1,152
------ ------ ------
$9,216 $8,443 $7,982
====== ====== ======
LONG-LIVED ASSETS
----------------------------
2002 2001 2000
------ ------ ------
U.S........................................................ $6,531 $6,232 $5,719
Mexico..................................................... 1,586 -- --
Other countries............................................ 1,127 914 960
------ ------ ------
$9,244 $7,146 $6,679
====== ====== ======
NOTE 14 -- RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
PepsiCo, Inc. ("PepsiCo") is considered a related party due to the nature
of our franchisee relationship and its ownership interest in our company.
Approximately 90% of our 2002 volume was derived from the sale of Pepsi-Cola
beverages. In addition, at December 28, 2002, PepsiCo owned 6.8% of our equity.
We have entered into a number of agreements with PepsiCo since PBG's
initial public offering. Although we are not a direct party to these contracts,
as the principal operating subsidiary of PBG, we derive direct benefit from
them. Accordingly, set forth below are the most significant agreements that
govern our relationship with PepsiCo:
The most significant agreements that govern our relationship with PepsiCo
consist of:
(1) The master bottling agreement for cola beverages bearing the
"Pepsi-Cola" and "Pepsi" trademark in the United States; master
bottling agreements and distribution agreements for non-cola
products in the United States, including Mountain Dew; and a master
fountain syrup agreement in the United States;
(2) Agreements similar to the master bottling agreement and the non-cola
agreements for each country, including Canada, Spain, Russia,
Greece, Turkey and Mexico, as well as a fountain syrup agreement
similar to the master syrup agreement for Canada;
(3) A shared services agreement whereby PepsiCo provides us or we
provide PepsiCo with certain support, including information
technology maintenance, procurement of raw materials, shared space,
employee benefits, credit and collection, international tax and
accounting services. The amounts paid or received under this
contract are equal to the actual costs incurred by the company
providing the service. Through 2001, a PepsiCo affiliate provided
casualty insurance to us; and
(4) Transition agreements that provide certain indemnities to the
parties, and provide for the allocation of tax and other assets,
liabilities, and obligations arising from periods prior to the
initial public offering. Under our tax separation agreement, PepsiCo
maintains full control and absolute discretion for any combined or
consolidated tax filings for tax periods ended on or before the
initial public offering. PepsiCo has contractually agreed to act in
good faith with respect to all tax audit matters affecting us. In
addition, PepsiCo has agreed to use its best efforts to settle all
joint interests in any common audit issue on a basis consistent with
prior practice.
55
BOTTLER INCENTIVES AND OTHER ARRANGEMENTS - We share a business objective
with PepsiCo of increasing the availability and consumption of Pepsi-Cola
beverages. Accordingly, PepsiCo, at its discretion, provides us with various
forms of bottler incentives to promote its beverages. These incentives cover a
variety of initiatives, including direct marketplace support, capital equipment
funding and advertising support. Based on the objective of the programs and
initiatives, we record bottler incentives as an adjustment to net revenues or as
a reduction of selling, delivery and administrative expenses. Direct marketplace
support represents PepsiCo's funding to assist us in offering sales and
promotional discounts to retailers and is recorded as an adjustment to net
revenues. Capital equipment funding is designed to help offset the costs of
purchasing and installing marketing equipment, such as vending machines and
glass door coolers at customer locations and is recorded as a reduction of
selling, delivery and administrative expenses. Advertising support represents
the cost of media time, promotional materials, and other advertising and
marketing costs that are funded by PepsiCo and is recorded as a reduction to
advertising and marketing expenses within selling, delivery and administrative
expenses. In addition, PepsiCo may share certain media costs with us due to our
joint objective of promoting PepsiCo brands. There are no conditions or other
requirements that could result in a repayment of the bottler incentives
received. Bottler incentives received from PepsiCo, including media costs shared
by PepsiCo, were $560 million, $554 million and $524 million for 2002, 2001 and
2000, respectively. Of these amounts, we recorded $257 million, $262 million and
$244 million for 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively, in net revenues, and the
remainder as a reduction of selling, delivery and administrative expenses.
PURCHASES OF CONCENTRATE AND FINISHED PRODUCT - We purchase concentrate
from PepsiCo, which is the critical flavor ingredient used in the production of
carbonated soft drinks and other ready-to-drink beverages. PepsiCo determines
the price of concentrate annually at its discretion. We also pay a royalty fee
to PepsiCo for the Aquafina trademark. Amounts paid or payable to PepsiCo and
its affiliates for concentrate and royalty fees were $1,699 million, $1,584
million and $1,507 million in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
We also produce or distribute other products and purchase finished goods
and concentrate through various arrangements with PepsiCo or PepsiCo joint
ventures. During 2002, 2001 and 2000, total amounts paid or payable to PepsiCo
or PepsiCo joint ventures for these transactions were $464 million, $375 million
and $155 million, respectively.
We provide manufacturing services to PepsiCo and PepsiCo affiliates in
connection with the production of certain finished beverage products. During
2002, 2001 and 2000, total amounts paid or payable by PepsiCo for these
transactions were $10 million, $32 million and $36 million, respectively.
FOUNTAIN SERVICE FEE - We manufacture and distribute fountain products and
provide fountain equipment service to PepsiCo customers in some territories in
accordance with the Pepsi beverage agreements. Amounts received from PepsiCo for
these transactions are offset by the cost to provide these services and are
reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Operations in selling, delivery and
administrative expenses. Net amounts paid or payable by PepsiCo to us for these
services were approximately $200 million, $185 million and $189 million, in
2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
OTHER TRANSACTIONS - Prior to 2002, Hillbrook Insurance Company, Inc., a
subsidiary of PepsiCo, provided insurance and risk management services to us
pursuant to a contractual agreement. Total premiums paid to Hillbrook Insurance
Company, Inc. during 2001 and 2000 were $58 million and $62 million,
respectively.
We provide PepsiCo and PepsiCo affiliates or PepsiCo provides us various
services pursuant to a shared services agreement and other arrangements,
including information technology maintenance, procurement of raw materials,
shared space, employee benefits, credit and collection, international tax and
accounting services. Total net expenses incurred were approximately $57 million,
$133 million and $117 million during 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
We purchase snack food products from Frito-Lay, Inc., a subsidiary of
PepsiCo, for sale and distribution in all of Russia except Moscow. Amounts paid
or payable to PepsiCo and its affiliates for snack food products were $44
million, $27 million and $24 million in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
56
The Consolidated Statements of Operations include the following income
(expense) amounts as a result of transactions with PepsiCo and its affiliates:
2002 2001 2000
-------- -------- --------
Net revenues:
Bottler incentives...................................... $ 257 $ 262 $ 244
======== ======== ========
Cost of sales:
Purchases of concentrate and finished products,
and Aquafina royalty fees............................ $ (2,163) $ (1,959) $ (1,662)
Manufacturing and distribution service reimbursements.. 10 32 36
-------- -------- --------
$ (2,153) $ (1,927) $ (1,626)
======== ======== ========
Selling, delivery and administrative expenses:
Bottler incentives...................................... $ 303 $ 292 $ 280
Fountain service fee.................................... 200 185 189
Frito-Lay purchases..................................... (44) (27) (24)
Insurance costs......................................... -- (58) (62)
Shared services......................................... (57) (133) (117)
-------- -------- --------
$ 402 $ 259 $ 266
======== ======== ========
We are not required to pay any minimum fees to PepsiCo, nor are we
obligated to PepsiCo under any minimum purchase requirements.
As part of our acquisition in Turkey (see Note 16), we paid PepsiCo $8
million for its share of Fruko Mesrubat Sanayii A.S. and related entities. In
addition, we sold certain brands to PepsiCo from the net assets acquired for $16
million.
As part of our acquisition of Gemex in Mexico (see Note 16), PepsiCo
received $297 million for the tender of its shares for its 34.4% ownership in
the outstanding capital stock of Gemex. In addition, PepsiCo made a payment to
us for $17 million, to facilitate the purchase and ensure a smooth ownership
transition of Gemex.
We paid PepsiCo $10 million and $9 million during 2002 and 2001,
respectively, for distribution rights relating to the SoBe brand in certain
PBG-owned territories in the U.S. and Canada.
The $1.3 billion of 5 5/8% senior notes and the $1.0 billion of 5 3/8%
senior notes issued on February 9, 1999, by us are guaranteed by PepsiCo. In
addition, the $1.0 billion of 4 5/8% senior notes issued on November 15, 2002,
also by us, will be guaranteed by PepsiCo in accordance with the terms set forth
in the related indenture.
Amounts payable to PepsiCo and its affiliates were $26 million and $17
million at December 28, 2002, and December 29, 2001, respectively. Such amounts
are recorded within accounts payable and other current liabilities in our
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
PBG is considered a related party, as we are the principal operating
subsidiary of PBG and we make up substantially of all of the operations and
assets of PBG. At December 28, 2002, PBG owned approximately 93.2% of our
equity.
Beginning in 2002, PBG provides insurance and risk management services to
us pursuant to a contractual agreement. Total premiums paid to PBG during 2002
was $86 million.
We have loaned PBG $117 million and $310 million during 2002 and 2001,
respectively, net of repayments. During 2002 these loans were made through a
series of 1-year notes, with interest rates ranging from 1.9% to 2.5%. Total
intercompany loans owed to us from PBG at December 28, 2002 and December 29,
57
2001, was $954 million and $837 million, respectively. The proceeds were used by
PBG to pay for interest, taxes, dividends, share repurchases and acquisitions.
Accrued interest receivable from PBG on these notes totaled $22 million and $44
million at December 28, 2002 and December 29, 2001, respectively, and is
included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in our Consolidated
Balance Sheets.
Total interest income recognized in our Consolidated Statements of
Operations relating to outstanding loans with PBG was $24 million, $44 million
and $36 million, in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
On March 8, 1999, PBG issued $1 billion of 7% senior notes due 2029, which
are guaranteed by us.
PBG has a $500 million commercial paper program that is supported by two
$250 million credit facilities, which is guaranteed by us. One of the credit
facilities expires in May 2003 and the other credit facility expires in April
2004. There were no borrowings outstanding under these credit facilities at
December 28, 2002, or December 29, 2001.
We also guarantee that to the extent there is available cash, we will
distribute pro rata to PBG and PepsiCo sufficient cash such that aggregate cash
distributed to PBG will enable PBG to pay its taxes and make interest payments
on the $1 billion 7% senior notes due 2029. During 2002 and 2001, we made cash
distributions to our owners totaling $156 million and $223 million,
respectively. Any amounts in excess of taxes and interest payments were used by
PBG to repay loans to us.
NOTE 15 -- CONTINGENCIES
We are involved in a lawsuit with current and former employees concerning
wage and hour issues in New Jersey. We believe that the ultimate resolution to
this matter will not have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations, financial condition or liquidity. Subsequent to year end we have
resolved this matter, see Note 18.
We are subject to various claims and contingencies related to lawsuits,
taxes, environmental and other matters arising out of the normal course of
business. We believe that the ultimate liability arising from such claims or
contingencies, if any, in excess of amounts already recognized is not likely to
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition
or liquidity.
NOTE 16 -- ACQUISITIONS
During 2002, we acquired the operations and exclusive right to
manufacture, sell and distribute Pepsi-Cola beverages from several PepsiCo
franchise bottlers. The following acquisitions occurred for an aggregate amount
of $921 million in cash and $369 million of assumed debt:
- Fruko Mesrubat Sanayii A.S. and related entities of Turkey in March.
- Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of Aroostook, Inc., of Presque Isle,
Maine in June.
- Seaman's Beverages Limited of the Canadian province of Prince Edward
Island in July.
- Pepsi-Gemex, S.A. de. C.V of Mexico in November.
- Kitchener Beverages Limited of Ontario, Canada in December.
Also in 2002, PBG acquired the Pepsi-Cola bottling operations along with
the exclusive right to manufacture, sell and distribute Pepsi-Cola beverages
from Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of Macon, Inc. in Georgia ("Macon"). In
connection with the acquisition, PBG contributed the business and certain net
assets of Macon totaling $24 million to Bottling LLC.
The largest of our acquisitions was Gemex, where we acquired all of their
outstanding capital stock. Our total cost for the purchase of Gemex was a net
cash payment of $871 million and assumed debt of approximately $305 million.
Gemex produces, sells and distributes a variety of soft drink products under the
Pepsi-Cola, Pepsi Light, Pepsi Max, Pepsi Limon, Mirinda, 7 UP, Diet 7 UP, KAS,
Mountain Dew, Power Punch and Manzanita Sol trademarks under exclusive franchise
and bottling arrangements with PepsiCo and certain affiliates of PepsiCo. Gemex
owns, produces, sells and distributes purified and mineral water in Mexico under
the trademarks Electropura and Garci Crespo and has rights to produce, sell and
distribute soft drink products of other companies in Mexico.
58
Our U.S. and Canadian acquisitions were made to enable us to provide
better service to our large retail customers. We expect these acquisitions to
reduce costs through economies of scale. The Mexican and Turkish acquisitions
were made to allow us to increase our markets outside the United States.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with our acquisitions and the
asset contribution of Macon from PBG, net of cash acquired:
ASSETS USEFUL
LIFE
(YEARS) GEMEX OTHER TOTAL
------- ------ ------ ------
Current assets ...................................... $ 101 $ 33 $ 134
Fixed assets......................................... 5-33 505 85 590
Intangible assets:
Non-compete agreements subject to amortization ... 3-5 -- 4 4
Franchise rights subject to amortization ......... 5 -- 8 8
Franchise rights not subject to amortization ..... 808 35 843
Goodwill (non-tax deductible) .................... 126 20 146
Other assets ........................................ 15 2 17
------ ------ ------
TOTAL ASSETS ......................... $1,555 $ 187 $1,742
====== ====== ======
LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and other current liabilities ....... $ 141 $ 42 $ 183
Short-term borrowings ................................ 5 50 55
Long-term debt ....................................... 300 14 314
Other liabilities .................................... 238 14 252
------ ------ ------
TOTAL LIABILITIES .................... $ 684 $ 120 $ 804
------ ------ ------
NET ASSETS ACQUIRED .................................... $ 871 $ 67 $ 938
====== ====== ======
In addition to the net assets acquired above, we also incurred
non-capitalizable costs associated with the acquisition of Gemex. As discussed
in Note 9, we entered into option contracts to mitigate certain foreign currency
risks in anticipation of our acquisition. These options expired unexercised and
the cash flow of $7 million associated with these options is included in
acquisitions of bottlers in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
The allocation of the purchase price for Gemex is preliminary, pending
final valuations on certain assets. The final allocations of the purchase price
will be determined based on the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities
assumed as of the date of acquisition.
Non-compete agreements and franchise rights that are subject to
amortization acquired during 2002 have a weighted-average amortization period of
three and five years, respectively.
The following unaudited pro forma operating information summarizes our
consolidated results of operations as if the Gemex acquisition had occurred on
the first day of fiscal year 2001.
2002 2001
------- ------
Net revenues.................. $10,297 $9,617
Income before income taxes.... $ 813 $ 615
Net income.................... $ 755 $ 608
The operating results of each of our acquisitions are included in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements from its respective date of
purchase.
During 2001, PBG acquired the Pepsi-Cola bottling operations along with
the exclusive right to
59
manufacture, sell and distribute Pepsi-Cola beverages from Pepsi-Cola Bottling
of Northern California. In connection with the acquisition, PBG contributed
certain net assets acquired totaling $74 million to Bottling LLC. Also during
2001, we acquired the operations and exclusive right to manufacture, sell and
distribute Pepsi-Cola beverages from Pepsi-Cola Elmira Bottling Co. Inc. for $46
million in cash and assumed debt. These acquisitions were made to enable us to
provide better service to our large retail customers as well as reduce costs
through economies of scale.
NOTE 17 - ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
The balances related to each component of accumulated other comprehensive
loss were as follows:
2002 2001 2000
------ ------ ------
Currency translation adjustment......... $ (276) $ (301) $ (253)
Cash flow hedge adjustment.............. (8) (19) --
Minimum pension liability adjustment.... (312) (96) --
------ ------ ------
Accumulated other comprehensive loss.... $ (596) $ (416) $ (253)
====== ====== ======
NOTE 18 -- SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (UNAUDITED)
During the first quarter of 2003, we acquired a Pepsi-Cola bottler based
in Buffalo, New York, for a purchase price of approximately $75 million.
In the first quarter of 2003, we settled a lawsuit with the New Jersey
State Department of Labor and with current and former employees concerning
overtime wage issues. The amount of this settlement was approximately $28
million, which was fully provided for in our litigation reserves as of December
28, 2002, in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
60
NOTE 19 -- SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH
2002 QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER FULL YEAR
------- ------- ------- ------- ---------
Net revenues............. $1,772 $2,209 $2,455 $2,780 $9,216
Gross profit............. 830 1,024 1,118 1,243 4,215
Operating income......... 135 272 338 152 897
Net income............... 107 240 287 100 734
FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH
2001 QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER FULL YEAR
------- ------- ------- ------- ---------
Net revenues............. $1,647 $2,060 $2,274 $2,462 $8,443
Gross profit............. 765 952 1,052 1,094 3,863
Operating income......... 90 218 285 85 678
Net income (1)........... 67 201 260 59 587
(1) During 2001, the Canadian Government passed laws reducing federal and
certain provincial corporate income tax rates. These rate changes resulted in
one-time gains of $16 million and $9 million in the second and third quarters of
2001, respectively.
61
Independent Auditors' Report
The Owners of
Bottling Group, LLC:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Bottling Group,
LLC as of December 28, 2002 and December 29, 2001, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, cash flows and changes in owners' equity for each of
the fiscal years in the three-year period ended December 28, 2002. These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of management of
Bottling Group, LLC. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Bottling Group, LLC
as of December 28, 2002 and December 29, 2001, and the results of its operations
and its cash flows for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended
December 28, 2002, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company
adopted FASB 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," as of December 30,
2001.
/s/ KPMG LLP
New York, New York
January 28, 2003
62
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. MANAGING DIRECTORS OF BOTTLING LLC
The name, age and background of each of Bottling LLC's Managing Directors
is set forth below.
JOHN T. CAHILL, 45, is a Managing Director of Bottling LLC. Mr. Cahill is also
PBG's Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. He had been PBG's Chief
Executive Officer since September 2001. Previously, Mr. Cahill served as PBG's
President and Chief Operating Officer from August 2000 to September 2001. Mr.
Cahill has been a member of PBG's Board of Directors since January 1999 and
served as PBG's Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer prior to
becoming President and Chief Operating Officer in August 2000. He was Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Pepsi-Cola Company from April
1998 until November 1998. Prior to that, Mr. Cahill was Senior Vice President
and Treasurer of PepsiCo, having been appointed to that position in April 1997.
In 1996, he became Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Pepsi-Cola North America. Mr. Cahill joined PepsiCo in 1989 where he held
several other senior financial positions through 1996.
PAMELA C. MCGUIRE, 55, is a Managing Director of Bottling LLC. She is also the
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of PBG. She was the Vice
President and Division Counsel of the Pepsi-Cola Company from 1989 to March
1998, at which time she was named its Vice President and Associate General
Counsel. Ms. McGuire joined PepsiCo in 1977 and held several other positions in
its legal department through 1989.
MATTHEW M. MCKENNA, 52, is a Managing Director of Bottling LLC. He is also the
Senior Vice President of Finance of PepsiCo. Previously he was Senior Vice
President and Treasurer and before that, Senior Vice President, Taxes. Prior to
joining PepsiCo in 1993 as Vice President, Taxes, he was a partner with the law
firm of Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts in New York.
Pursuant to Item 401(b) of Regulation S-K, the executive officers of Bottling
LLC are reported in Part I of this Report. Executive officers are elected by the
Managing Directors of Bottling LLC, and their terms of office continue until
their successors are appointed and qualified or until their earlier resignation
or removal. There are no family relationships among our executive officers.
Managing Directors are elected by a majority of Members of Bottling LLC and
their terms of office continue until their successors are appointed and
qualified or until their earlier resignation or removal, death or disability.
63
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
SUMMARY OF CASH AND CERTAIN OTHER COMPENSATION. The following table provides
information on compensation earned and stock options awarded for the years
indicated by PBG to Bottling LLC's Principal Executive Officer and the two other
executive officers of Bottling LLC as of the end of the 2002 fiscal year in
accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. These three
individuals are referred to as the named executive officers.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
LONG TERM
ANNUAL COMPENSATION COMPENSATION
------------------- ------------
AWARDS PAYOUTS
------ -------
Securities
Under-
Lying All Other
Name and Principal Other Annual Options LTIP Compensation
Position Year Salary($) Bonus($) Compensation($) (#) Payouts $ ($)
- ------------------ ---- -------- -------- --------- ------- -------- ----------
John T. Cahill 2002 $721,154 $681,500 $32,227(1) 287,129 $ 0 $ 6,843(2)
Principal 2001 636,712 870,000 12,566 739,300 442,200 6,821
Executive Officer 2000 539,904 811,320 14,139 240,000 0 6,800
Alfred H. Drewes 2002 355,923 217,550 13,060(3) 113,109 218,962(4) 6,338(5)
Principal Financial 2001 175,000 268,090 7,522 135,758 0 0
Officer 2000 __ __ __ __ __ __
Andrea L. Forster 2002 187,923 92,700 5,744 29,941 111,219(6) 7,498(5)
Principal 2001 180,154 106,920 4,695 43,622 0 6,800
Accounting Officer 2000 163,857 126,990 4,695 33,707 0 6,800
- ----------------------
(1) This amount reflects (i) benefits from the use of corporate transportation;
(ii) payment of executive's tax liability with respect to certain PBG
provided perquisites and (iii) reimbursement for appropriate tax-related
expenses.
(2) This amount reflects (i) a standard PBG matching contribution in PBG Common
Stock to the executive's 401(k) account and (ii) premium amount of $119.89
for Mr. Cahill imputed as income in connection with his waiver of rights to
future compensation payments under the PBG's executive income deferral plan
and the arrangement entered into by PBG whereby such waived amounts were
used for the purpose of purchasing insurance for his benefit and that of his
designated beneficiary, as previously disclosed in PBG 2002 proxy statement.
(3) This amount reflects payment of executive's tax liability with respect to
certain PBG provided perquisites.
(4) This amount reflects the cash payout of a variable award granted in 1999
based, in part, upon PBG performance targets pre-established by the
Compensation Subcommittee of the Compensation and Management Development
Committee of the PBG Board of Directors.
(5) This amount reflects a standard PBG matching contribution in PBG Common
Stock to the executive's 401(k) account.
(6) This amount reflects a one-time supplemental executive incentive
compensation cash award to recognize key managers for superior business
results and to ensure management continuity. The cash amount was paid into a
defined contribution trust by PBG. The executive officer must have remained
employed by PBG through the vesting date of February 1, 2002.
64
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
PBG holds 93.2% and PepsiCo indirectly holds 6.8% of the ownership of
Bottling LLC.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Although Bottling LLC may not be a direct party to the following
transactions, as the principal operating subsidiary of PBG, it derives certain
benefits from them. Accordingly, set forth below is information relating to
certain transactions between PBG and PepsiCo. In addition, set forth below is
information relating to certain transactions between Bottling LLC and PBG
("PBG/Bottling LLC Transactions").
STOCK OWNERSHIP AND DIRECTOR RELATIONSHIPS WITH PEPSICO. PBG was initially
incorporated in January 1999 as a wholly owned subsidiary of PepsiCo to effect
the separation of most of PepsiCo's company-owned bottling businesses. PBG
became a publicly traded company on March 31, 1999. As of February 21, 2003,
PepsiCo's ownership represented 38.0% of the outstanding Common Stock and 100%
of the outstanding Class B Common Stock together representing 43.1% of the
voting power of all classes of PBG's voting stock. PepsiCo also owns 6.8% of the
equity of Bottling Group, LLC, PBG's principal operating subsidiary. In
addition, Matthew M. McKenna, a Managing Director of Bottling LLC, is an
executive officer of PepsiCo.
AGREEMENTS AND TRANSACTIONS WITH PEPSICO AND AFFILIATES. PBG and PepsiCo
(and certain of its affiliates) have entered into transactions and agreements
with one another, incident to their respective businesses, and PBG and PepsiCo
are expected to enter into material transactions and agreements from time to
time in the future. As used in this section (other than with respect to
PBG/Bottling LLC Transactions), "PBG" may include Bottling LLC and its
subsidiaries.
Material agreements and transactions between PBG and PepsiCo (and certain
of its affiliates) during 2002 are described below.
Beverage Agreements and Purchases of Concentrates and Finished Products.
PBG purchases concentrates from PepsiCo and manufactures, packages, distributes
and sells carbonated and non-carbonated beverages under license agreements with
PepsiCo. These agreements give PBG the right to manufacture, sell and distribute
beverage products of PepsiCo in both bottles and cans and fountain syrup in
specified territories. The agreements also provide PepsiCo with the ability to
set prices of such concentrates, as well as the terms of payment and other terms
and conditions under which PBG purchases such concentrates. In addition, PBG
bottles water under the Aquafina trademark pursuant to an agreement with
PepsiCo, which provides for the payment of a royalty fee to PepsiCo. In certain
instances, PBG purchases finished beverage products from PepsiCo.
During 2002, total payments by PBG to PepsiCo for concentrates, royalties
and finished beverage products were approximately $1.9 billion.
PBG Manufacturing Services. PBG provides manufacturing services to PepsiCo
in connection with the production of certain finished beverage products. In
2002, amounts paid or payable by PepsiCo to PBG for these services were
approximately $9.8 million.
Purchase of Distribution Rights. During 2002, PBG paid PepsiCo
approximately $10.3 million for distribution rights relating to the SoBe brand
in certain PBG-owned territories in the United States and Canada.
65
Transactions with Joint Ventures in which PepsiCo holds an equity
interest. PBG purchases tea concentrate and finished beverage products from the
Pepsi/Lipton Tea Partnership, a joint venture of Pepsi-Cola North America, a
division of PepsiCo, and Lipton (the "Partnership"). During 2002, total amounts
paid or payable to PepsiCo for the benefit of the Partnership were approximately
$130.5 million. In addition, PBG provides certain manufacturing services in
connection with the hot-filled tea products of the Partnership to PepsiCo for
the benefit of the Partnership. In 2002, amounts paid or payable by PepsiCo to
PBG for these services were approximately $0.3 million.
PBG purchases finished beverage products from the North American Coffee
Partnership, a joint venture of Pepsi-Cola North America and Starbucks. During
2002, amounts paid or payable to the North American Coffee Partnership by PBG
were approximately $133.4 million.
In addition to the amounts described above, PBG received approximately
$2.9 million in 2002 from an international joint venture, in which PepsiCo holds
an equity interest.
Purchase of Snack Food Products from Frito-Lay, Inc. PBG purchases snack
food products from Frito-Lay, Inc., a subsidiary of PepsiCo, for sale and
distribution through all of Russia except for Moscow. In 2002, amounts paid or
payable by PBG to Frito-Lay, Inc. were approximately $44 million.
Shared Services. PepsiCo provides various services to PBG pursuant to a
shared services agreement and other arrangements, including information
technology maintenance and the procurement of raw materials. During 2002,
amounts paid or payable to PepsiCo for these services totaled approximately
$70.6 million.
Pursuant to the shared services agreement and other arrangements, PBG
provides various services to PepsiCo, including employee benefit, credit and
collection, international tax and accounting services. During 2002, payments to
PBG from PepsiCo for these services totaled approximately $6.4 million.
Rental Payments. Amounts paid or payable by PepsiCo to PBG for rental of
office space at certain PBG facilities were approximately $5.0 million in 2002.
National Fountain Services. PBG provides certain manufacturing, delivery
and equipment maintenance services to PepsiCo's national fountain customers. In
2002, net amounts paid or payable by PepsiCo to PBG for these services were
approximately $199.9 million.
Bottler Incentives. PepsiCo provides PBG with various forms of bottler
incentives. The level of this support is negotiated annually and can be
increased or decreased at the discretion of PepsiCo. These bottler incentives
are intended to cover a variety of programs and initiatives, including direct
marketplace support (including point-of-sale materials), capital equipment
funding and advertising support. For 2002, total bottler incentives paid or
payable to PBG or on behalf of PBG by PepsiCo approximated $560.1 million.
Transactions with Bottlers in which PepsiCo holds an Equity Interest. PBG
and PepsiAmericas, Inc., a bottler in which PepsiCo owns an equity interest, and
PBG and Pepsi Bottling Ventures LLC, a bottler in which PepsiCo owns an equity
interest, bought from and sold to each other finished beverage products. These
transactions occurred in instances where the proximity of one party's production
facilities to the other party's markets or lack of manufacturing capability, as
well as other economic considerations, made it more efficient or desirable for
one bottler to buy finished product from another. In 2002, PBG's sales to those
bottlers totaled approximately $671,000 and purchases were approximately
$127,000.
PBG provides certain administrative support services to PepsiAmericas,
Inc. and Pepsi Bottling Ventures LLC. In 2002, amounts paid or payable by
PepsiAmericas, Inc. and Pepsi Bottling Ventures LLC to PBG for these services
were approximately $1.6 million.
66
On March 13, 2002, PBG acquired the operations and exclusive right to
manufacture, sell and distribute Pepsi-Cola's international beverages in Turkey.
As part of this acquisition, PBG paid PepsiCo approximately $7.8 million,
subject to certain purchase price adjustments, for its equity interest in the
acquired entity and received approximately $16.4 million from PepsiCo for the
sale of the acquired entity's local brands to PepsiCo.
In November 2002, we acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of
Pepsi-Gemex S.A. de C.V. ("Pepsi-Gemex"). As part of this acquisition, PepsiCo
received approximately $297 million for its equity interest in the acquired
entity. In addition, PepsiCo made a payment to us of approximately $17 million
to facilitate the purchase and ensure the smooth ownership transition of
Pepsi-Gemex to PBG.
PepsiCo Guarantee. In connection with our issuance of $1.0 billion
aggregate principal amount of 4-5/8% senior notes in November 2002, PepsiCo will
guarantee the notes in accordance with the terms set forth in the related
indenture.
PBG/Bottling LLC Transactions. PBG is considered a related party, as we
are the principal operating subsidiary of PBG and we make up substantially
all of the operations and assets of PBG. At December 28, 2002, PBG owned
approximately 93.2% of our equity.
Beginning in 2002, PBG provides insurance and risk management services to
us pursuant to a contractual agreement. The total amount of premiums paid to PBG
during 2002 was $86 million.
We have loaned PBG $117 million during 2002 net of repayments. These loans
were made through a series of 1-year notes, with interest rates ranging from
1.9% to 2.5%. The total amount of intercompany loans owed to us from PBG at
December 28, 2002 was $954 million. The proceeds were used by PBG to pay for
interest, taxes, dividends, share repurchases and acquisitions. Accrued interest
receivable from PBG on these notes totaled $22 million at December 28, 2002 and
is included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in our Consolidated
Balance Sheets.
Total interest income recognized in our Consolidated Statements of
Operations relating to outstanding loans with PBG was $24 million in 2002.
We also guarantee that to the extent there is available cash, we will
distribute pro rata to PBG and PepsiCo sufficient cash such that aggregate cash
distributed to PBG will enable PBG to pay its taxes and make interest payments
on the $1 billion 7% senior notes due 2029. During 2002, we made cash
distributions to our owners totaling $156 million. Any amounts in excess of
taxes and interest payments were used by PBG to repay loans to us.
Relationships and Transactions with Management and Others. Linda G.
Alvarado, a member of PBG's Board of Directors, together with her husband and
children, own and operate Taco Bell and Pizza Hut restaurant companies that
purchase beverage products from PBG. In 2002, the total amount of these
purchases was approximately $341,389.
ITEM 14. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
EVALUATION OF OUR DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND INTERNAL CONTROLS.
Within 90 days prior to the date of this report, Bottling LLC carried out an
evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management,
including the Principal Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer of
Bottling LLC, of the effectiveness and design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures pursuant to the Exchange Act Rule 13a-14. Based upon
that evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and the Principal Financial
Officer concluded, subject to the limitations set forth below, that our
disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to
material information relating to Bottling LLC and its consolidated subsidiaries
required to be included in Bottling LLC's periodic filings with the SEC. In
addition, subject to the limitations set forth
67
below, there were no significant changes in our internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect these internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation.
LIMITATIONS ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CONTROLS.
Bottling LLC's management, including the Principal Executive Officer and the
Principal Financial Officer of Bottling LLC, does not expect that our disclosure
controls or our internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A
control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only
reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system
are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that
there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered
relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control
systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all
control issues within our company have been detected. The design of any system
of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood
of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in
achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Because of the
inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to
error or fraud may occur and may not be detected.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) 1. Financial Statements. The following consolidated financial statements of
Bottling LLC and its subsidiaries, are incorporated by reference into Part II,
Item 8 of this report:
Consolidated Statements of Operations - Fiscal years ended December 28,
2002, December 29, 2001 and December 30, 2000.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Fiscal years ended December 28,
2002, December 29, 2001 and December 30, 2000.
Consolidated Balance Sheets - December 28, 2002 and December 29, 2001.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Owners' Equity - Fiscal years
ended December 28, 2002, December 29, 2001 and December 30, 2000.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Report of Independent Auditors.
2. Financial Statement Schedule. The following financial statement
schedule of Bottling LLC and its subsidiaries is included in this report on the
page indicated:
Page
----
Independent Auditors' Report on Schedule ....................................F-2
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the fiscal years ended
December 28, 2002, December 29, 2001 and December 30, 2000...................F-3
3. Exhibits
See Index to Exhibits on pages E-1 - E-3.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None.
68
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, Bottling Group, LLC has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: March 27, 2003
Bottling Group, LLC
By:/s/ John T. Cahill
------------------
John T. Cahill
Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of Bottling
Group, LLC and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
- --------- ----- ----
/s/ John T. Cahill Principal Executive Officer March 27, 2003
- ------------------ and Managing Director
John T. Cahill
/s/ Alfred H. Drewes Principal Financial Officer March 27, 2003
- --------------------
Alfred H. Drewes
/s/ Andrea L. Forster Principal Accounting Officer March 27, 2003
- ---------------------
Andrea L. Forster
/s/ Pamela C. McGuire Managing Director March 27, 2003
- ---------------------
Pamela C. McGuire
/s/ Matthew M. McKenna Managing Director March 27, 2003
- ----------------------
Matthew M. McKenna
S-1
I, John T. Cahill, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Bottling Group,
LLC;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this annual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this annual report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant
and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to
ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual
report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within
90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report
(the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) Presented in this annual report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors
and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation
of internal controls which could adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
internal controls; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in
this annual report whether there were significant changes in
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly
affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: March 24, 2003
By: /s/ John T. Cahill
------------------
John T. Cahill
Principal Executive Officer
I, Alfred H. Drewes, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Bottling Group, LLC;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to
the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date");
and
c) Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based
on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors
and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in
this annual report whether there were significant changes in
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly
affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: March 25, 2003
By: /s/ Alfred H. Drewes
------------------------
Alfred H. Drewes
Principal Financial Officer
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
PAGE
Independent Auditors' Report on Schedule ...............................................................F-2
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the fiscal years ended
December 28, 2002, December 29, 2001 and December 30, 2000 .............................................F-3
F-1
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
Owners of
Bottling Group, LLC:
The audits referred to in our report dated January 28, 2003, included the
related consolidated financial statement schedule as of December 28, 2002, and
for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended December 28, 2002,
incorporated in this Form 10-K. This financial statement schedule is the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on this financial statement schedule based on our audits. In our
opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the
basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all
material respects the information set forth therein.
/s/ KPMG LLP
New York, New York
March 28, 2003
SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
BOTTLING GROUP, LLC
IN MILLIONS
Balance Charged
At to Cost Accounts Foreign Balance At
Beginning and Written Currency End Of
Of Period Expenses Acquisitions Off Translation Period
--------- -------- ------------ --- ----------- ------
DESCRIPTION
- -----------
FISCAL YEAR
ENDED
DECEMBER 28,
2002
Allowance
for losses
on trade
accounts
receivable .. $42 $32 $14 $(22) $1 $ 67
DECEMBER 29,
2001
Allowance
for losses
on trade
accounts
receivable .. $42 $9 $ -- $(9) $ -- $42
DECEMBER 30,
2000
Allowance
for losses
on trade
accounts
receivable .. $48 $3 $ -- $(8) $(1) $42
- ------------------------
F-3
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT
3.1 Articles of Formation of Bottling LLC which is incorporated herein by
reference from Exhibit 3.4 to Bottling LLC's Registration Statement on
Form S-4 (Registration No.333-80361)
3.2 Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Bottling LLC
which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.5 to Bottling
LLC's Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-80361)
4.1 Indenture dated as of February 8, 1999 among Pepsi Bottling Holdings,
Inc., PepsiCo, Inc. and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as trustee, relating to
$1,000,000,000 5 3/8% Senior Notes due 2004 and $1,300,000,000 5 5/8%
Senior Notes due 2009, which is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.9 to PBG's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No.
333-70291).
4.2 First Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 8, 1999 among Pepsi
Bottling Holdings, Inc., Bottling Group, LLC, PepsiCo, Inc. and The Chase
Manhattan Bank, as trustee, supplementing the Indenture dated as of
February 8, 1999 among Pepsi Bottling Holdings, Inc., PepsiCo, Inc. and
The Chase Manhattan Bank, as trustee, which is incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.10 to PBG's Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-70291).
4.3 Indenture, dated as of March 8, 1999, by and among The Pepsi Bottling
Group, Inc. ("PBG"), as obligor, Bottling Group, LLC, as guarantor, and
The Chase Manhattan Bank, as trustee, relating to $1,000,000,000 7% Series
B Senior Notes due 2029, which is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.14 to PBG's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration
No. 333-70291).
4.4 U.S. $250,000,000 5 Year Credit Agreement, dated as of April 22, 1999
among PBG, Bottling Group, LLC, The Chase Manhattan Bank, Bank of America
National Trust and Savings Association, Citibank, N.A., Credit Suisse
First Boston, UBS AG, Lehman Commercial Paper Inc., Royal Bank of Canada,
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya, Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch and/or Cayman
Islands Branch, Fleet National Bank, Hong Kong & Shanghai Banking Corp.,
The Bank of New York, The Northern Trust Company, The Chase Manhattan
Bank, as Agent, Chase Securities Inc. as Arranger and Nationsbanc
Montgomery Securities LLC and Solomon Smith Barney Inc. as Co-Syndication
Agents, which is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to PBG's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 25, 1999.
4.5 U.S. $250,000,000 364 Day Credit Agreement, dated as of May 3, 2000 among
PBG, Bottling Group, LLC, The Chase Manhattan Bank, Bank of America, N.
A., Citibank, N.A., Credit Suisse First Boston, UBS AG, Lehman Commercial
Paper Inc., The Northern Trust Company, Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch
and/or Cayman Islands Branch, Royal Bank of Canada, Banco Bilbao Vizcaya,
Fleet National Bank, The Bank of New York, The Chase Manhattan Bank, as
Agent, Salomon Smith Barney Inc and Banc of America Securities LLC as
Co-Lead Arrangers and Book Managers and Citibank, N.A. and Bank of
America, N.A., as Co-Syndication Agents, which is incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 4.7 to PBG's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 30, 2000.
4.6 U.S. $250,000,000 364-Day Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement,
dated as of May 1, 2002 among PBG, Bottling Group, LLC, JPMorgan Chase
Bank, Citibank, N.A., Bank of America, N. A., Deutsche Bank AG New York
Branch and/or Cayman Islands Branch, Credit Suisse First Boston, The
Northern Trust Company, Lehman Commercial Paper Inc., , Royal Bank of
Canada, Banco Bilbao Vizcaya, The Bank of New York, Fleet National Bank,
State
Street Bank and Trust Company, JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Agent, Banc of
America Securities LLC and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. as Co-Lead
Arrangers and Joint Book Managers and Bank of America, N.A. and Citibank,
N.A., as Co-Syndication Agents.
4.7 Indenture, dated as of November 15, 2002, among Bottling Group, LLC,
PepsiCo, Inc., as Guarantor, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Trustee, relating
to $1 Billion 4-5/8% Senior Notes due November 15, 2012.
4.8 Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 7, 2002 relating to
the 4-5/8% Senior Notes due November 15, 2012.
4.9 Agreement to Tender, dated as of October 4, 2002, among PBG Grupo
Embotellador Hispano-Mexicano S.L., Bottling Group, LLC and PepsiCo, Inc.,
which is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(1) to Schedule to
Tender Offer Statement as filed by PBG (SEC File Number 005-46036).
4.10 Agreement to Tender, dated as of October 4, 2002, among PBG Grupo
Embotellador Hispano-Mexicano S.L., Bottling Group, LLC and Enrique C.
Molina Sobrino, which is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
(d)(2) to Schedule to Tender Offer Statement as filed by PBG (SEC File
Number 005-46036).
4.11 Escrow Agreement, dated as of October 4, 2002 among PBG Grupo Embotellador
Hispano-Mexicano S.L., Bottling Group, LLC and Enrique C. Molina Sobrino
and The Bank of New York, which is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit (d)(3) to Schedule to Tender Offer Statement as filed by PBG (SEC
File Number 005-46036).
21 Subsidiaries of Bottling LLC.
23 Report of KPMG LLP
99.1 The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc. consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto for the year ended December 28, 2002.