Back to GetFilings.com
1
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
------------------------
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 0-27662
IPC HOLDINGS, LTD.
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
BERMUDA NOT APPLICABLE
- ------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF (I.R.S. EMPLOYER
INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION) IDENTIFICATION NO.)
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL BUILDING, 29 RICHMOND ROAD, PEMBROKE, HM 08, BERMUDA
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)
(441) 298-5100
----------------
(REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER,
INCLUDING AREA CODE)
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT: NONE
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT: COMMON SHARES, PAR
VALUE $0.01 PER SHARE
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if the disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to
Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained,
to the best of the Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]
The aggregate market value of the Registrant's Common Shares held by
non-affiliates of the Registrant as of March 19, 2001, was $417,187,584, based
on the last reported sale price of Common Shares on the Nasdaq National Market
system on that date.
The number of the Registrant's Common Shares, par value U.S. $0.01 per
share, as of March 19, 2001, was 25,063,072.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
1. Portions of the Registrant's 2000 Annual Report to Shareholders to be
mailed to shareholders on or about April 26, 2001 are incorporated by reference
into Part II of this Form 10-K. With the exception of the portions of the Annual
Report specifically incorporated herein by reference, the Annual Report is not
deemed to be filed as part of this Form 10-K.
2. Portions of the Registrant's definitive proxy statement to be filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), relating to
the Registrant's Annual Meeting of Shareholders scheduled to be held June 15,
2001 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K. With the
exception of the portions of the Proxy Statement specifically incorporated
herein by reference, the Proxy Statement is not deemed to be filed as part of
this Form 10-K.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2
IPC HOLDINGS, LTD.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
ITEM NUMBER
- ---- ------
PART I
1. Business.................................................... 2
2. Properties.................................................. 18
3. Legal Proceedings........................................... 19
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders......... 19
PART II
5. Market for the Registrant's Common Stock and Related
Shareholder Matters......................................... 19
6. Selected Financial Data..................................... 20
7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations................................... 21
7A. Quantitative & Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.... 21
8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data................. 21
9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting
and Financial Disclosure.................................... 21
PART III
10. Directors and Executive Officers............................ 22
11. Executive Compensation...................................... 22
12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management.................................................. 22
13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.............. 22
PART IV
14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form
8-K......................................................... 22
1
3
PART I
NOTE ON FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning
of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the
Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements are statements other than historical
information or statements of current condition. Some forward-looking statements
may be identified by use of terms such as "believes", "anticipates", "intends",
or "expects". These forward-looking statements relate to the plans and
objectives of IPC Holdings, Ltd., a company incorporated under the laws of
Bermuda (the "Company"), for future operations. In light of the risks and
uncertainties inherent in all forward-looking statements, the inclusion of such
statements in this report should not be considered as a representation by the
Company or any other person that the objectives or plans of the Company will be
achieved. Numerous factors could cause the Company's actual results to differ
materially from those in the forward-looking statements, including, but not
limited to the following: (i) the occurrence of catastrophic events with a
frequency or severity exceeding the Company's estimates; (ii) a decrease in the
level of demand for property catastrophe reinsurance, or increased competition
owing to increased capacity of property catastrophe reinsurers; (iii) any
lowering or loss of one of the financial ratings of the Company's wholly owned
subsidiary, IPCRe Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of Bermuda
("IPCRe" and together with the Company, IPCRe Europe (as defined herein) and
IPCRe Services (as defined herein), "we" or "IPC"), (iv) loss of the Company's
non-admitted status in United States jurisdictions; (v) loss of services of any
one of the Company's executive officers; (vi) the passage of federal or state
legislation subjecting the Company to supervision or regulation in the United
States; (vii) challenges by insurance regulators in the United States or the
United Kingdom to our claim of exemption from insurance regulation under current
laws; or (viii) a contention by the United States Internal Revenue Service that
the Company or IPCRe is engaged in the conduct of a trade or business within the
U.S.
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS
IPC Holdings, through IPCRe and IPCRe's wholly-owned subsidiary, IPCRe
Europe Limited, provides property catastrophe reinsurance and, to a limited
extent, marine, aviation, property-per-risk excess and other short-tail property
reinsurance on a worldwide basis. During 2000, approximately 85% of gross
premiums written covered property catastrophe risks. Property catastrophe
reinsurance covers unpredictable events such as hurricanes, windstorms,
hailstorms, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, fires, industrial explosions,
freezes, riots, floods and other man-made or natural disasters. Substantially
all reinsurance written by IPCRe has been, and continues to be, written on an
excess-of-loss basis for primary insurers rather than reinsurers, and is subject
to aggregate limits on exposure to losses. As of January 1, 2001, we had
approximately 213 clients, including many of the leading insurance companies
around the world. Approximately 47% of our clients in 2000 were based in the
United States, and approximately 42% of gross premiums written during 2000
related primarily to U.S. risks. Our non-U.S. clients and covered risks are
located principally in Europe, Japan and Australia/New Zealand. At December 31,
2000, we had total shareholders' investment of $559 million and total assets of
$647 million.
In response to a severe imbalance between the global supply of and demand
for property catastrophe reinsurance that developed in the period from 1989
through 1993, the Company and IPCRe were formed and commenced operations in July
1993 through the sponsorship of American International Group, Inc. ("AIG"), a
holding company incorporated in Delaware which, through its subsidiaries, is
primarily engaged in a broad range of insurance and insurance-related activities
and financial services in the United States and abroad. AIG purchased 24.4% of
the initial share capital of the Company and an option (exercisable in specified
conditions) to obtain up to an additional 10% (on a fully diluted basis,
excluding employee stock options) of the share capital of the Company (the "AIG
Option"). Since our formation, subsidiaries of AIG have provided administrative,
investment management and custodial services to us, and the Chairman of the
Boards of Directors of the Company and IPCRe is also a director and officer of
various subsidiaries and affiliates of AIG. AIG has informed us that AIG
presently intends to continue its share ownership in the Company for the
2
4
foreseeable future. See "Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions." For discussion of the limitation of voting rights of any 10% or
more beneficial owner of Common Shares (including AIG) to less than 10% of total
voting rights, see Amendment No. 1 to the Company's Registration Statement on
Form 8-A, dated February 9, 1996.
On March 13, 1996, IPC Holdings completed an initial public offering in
which 13,521,739 of the 25,000,000 Common shares outstanding, were sold by
existing shareholders. IPC Holdings' Common Shares are included for trading on
the Nasdaq National Market under the ticker symbol "IPCR".
On September 10, 1998, IPCRe incorporated a subsidiary in Ireland, named
IPCRe Europe Limited. Effective October 1, 1998, IPCRe Europe commenced
underwriting selected reinsurance business in Europe. Currently, IPCRe Europe
retrocedes 90% of the business it underwrites to IPCRe. IPCRe Services Limited,
a subsidiary of IPC Holdings, Ltd., was established in the United Kingdom, from
which European marketing efforts were conducted on behalf of IPCRe and IPCRe
Europe. IPCRe Services, formed in 1997, ceased operations in January, 2000,
because consolidation among clients and brokers reduced the need to maintain a
physical presence in the U.K. to promote our services.
BUSINESS STRATEGY
Our principal strategy is to provide property catastrophe excess-of-loss
reinsurance programs to a geographically diverse, worldwide clientele of primary
insurers with whom we maintain long-term relationships. To a lesser extent, we
also seek to provide these clients with other excess-of-loss short-tail property
reinsurance products. To a limited extent, we provide similar reinsurance
programs and products to reinsurers. We periodically consider underwriting
additional lines of property/casualty coverage, including on a non-
excess-of-loss basis, provided losses can be limited in a manner comparable to
that described below.
The primary elements of our strategy include:
DISCIPLINED RISK MANAGEMENT. We seek to limit and diversify our loss
exposure through six principal mechanisms: (i) writing substantially all of our
premiums on an excess-of-loss basis, which limits our ultimate exposure per
contract and permits us to determine and monitor our aggregate loss exposure;
(ii) adhering to maximum limitations on reinsurance accepted in defined
geographical zones; (iii) limiting program size for each client in order to
achieve diversity within and across geographical zones; (iv) administering risk
management controls appropriately weighted with sophisticated modeling
techniques, as well as our assessment of qualitative factors (such as the
quality of the cedent's management and capital and risk management strategy);
(v) utilizing a range of attachment points for any given program in order to
balance the risks assumed with the premiums written; and (vi) prudent
underwriting of each program written.
CAPITAL-BASED EXPOSURE LIMITS. Each year, we establish maximum limitations
on reinsurance accepted in defined geographic zones on the basis of, and as a
proportion of, shareholders' investment.
CLIENT SELECTION AND PROFILE. We believe that establishing long-term
relationships with insurers who have sound capital and risk management
strategies is key to creating long-term value for our shareholders. We have
successfully attracted customers that are generally sophisticated,
long-established insurers who desire the assurance not only that claims will be
paid, but that reinsurance will continue to be available after claims have been
paid. We believe our financial stability and growth of capital are essential for
creating and maintaining these long-term relationships.
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT AND SHAREHOLDER RETURNS. We manage our capital relative
to our risk exposure in an effort to maximize sustainable long-term growth in
shareholder value, while recognizing that catastrophic losses will adversely
impact short-term financial results from time to time. We seek growth of our
capital to protect it from major catastrophes, to ensure ongoing customer
relationships and to support premium growth opportunities.
DISCIPLINED INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT. In light of the risks of our business,
our fixed maturity investment portfolio is limited to the top three investment
grades (i.e., AAA, AA or A), or the equivalent thereof, at the time of purchase.
In addition, we purchased shares of stock in the companies which comprise the
Standard &
3
5
Poor's ("S & P") 500 Index. The investment in such equities represented 10.9% of
the total investment portfolio at December 31, 2000. On that date, 83.3% of the
fixed maturity investment portfolio consisted of cash, U.S. Treasuries or other
government agency issues and investments with an AAA or AA rating.
BUSINESS
GENERAL. We provide treaty reinsurance principally to insurers of personal
and commercial property worldwide. Treaty reinsurance is reinsurance of a
specified type or category of risk defined in a contract. As described below, we
write substantially all reinsurance on an excess-of-loss basis. Our property
catastrophe reinsurance coverages, which accounted for 85% of our gross premiums
written during 2000, are generally "all-risk" in nature, subject to various
policy exclusions. Our predominant exposure under such coverages is to property
damage from unpredictable events such as hurricanes, windstorms, hailstorms,
earthquakes and volcanic eruptions, although we are also exposed to losses from
sources as diverse as freezes, riots, floods, industrial explosions, fires, and
other man-made or natural disasters. The balance of premiums written are derived
from marine, aviation, property-per-risk excess and other short-tail property
reinsurance. In accordance with market practice, our property catastrophe
reinsurance coverage generally excludes certain risks such as terrorism, war,
pollution, nuclear contamination and radiation.
Because we underwrite property catastrophe reinsurance and have large
aggregate exposures to natural and man-made disasters, our loss experience
generally has included and will continue to include infrequent events of great
severity. Consequently, the occurrence of losses from catastrophic events has
caused and is likely to continue to cause our financial results to be volatile.
In addition, because catastrophes are an inherent risk of our business, a major
event or series of events, such as occurred during 1998 and 1999, can be
expected to occur from time to time. In the future, such events could have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations,
possibly to the extent of eliminating our shareholders' investment. Increases in
the values and concentrations of insured property and the effects of inflation
have resulted in increased severity of industry losses in recent years, and we
expect that those factors will increase the severity of catastrophe losses per
year in the future.
We currently seek to limit our loss exposure principally by offering
substantially all of our products on an excess-of-loss basis, adhering to
maximum limitations on reinsurance accepted in defined geographic zones,
limiting program size for each client and prudent underwriting of each program
written. In addition, our policies contain limitations and exclusions from
coverage and choice of forum. There can be no assurance that our efforts to
limit exposure by using the foregoing methods will be successful. In addition,
geographic zone limitations involve significant underwriting judgments,
including the determination of the area of the zones and the inclusion of a
particular policy within a zone's limits. Underwriting is inherently a matter of
judgment, involving important assumptions about matters that are inherently
unpredictable and beyond our control, and for which historical experience and
probability analysis may not provide sufficient guidance.
EXCESS-OF-LOSS REINSURANCE CONTRACTS. Our policy is to write most of our
business within excess-of-loss reinsurance contracts. Such contracts provide a
defined limit of liability, permitting us to quantify our aggregate maximum loss
exposure. By contrast, maximum liability under pro-rata contracts is more
difficult to quantify precisely. Quantification of loss exposure is fundamental
to our ability to manage our loss exposure through geographical zone limits and
the program limits described below. Excess-of-loss contracts also help us to
control our underwriting results by increasing our flexibility to determine
premiums for reinsurance at specific retention levels, independent of the
premiums charged by primary insurers, and based upon our own underwriting
assumptions. In addition, because primary insurers typically retain a larger
loss exposure under excess-of-loss contracts, they have a greater incentive to
underwrite risks and adjust losses in a prudent manner.
In addition, we diversify our risk by, to a limited extent, writing other
short-tail property coverages, including risk excess-of-loss, marine and
aviation. These lines diversify risk (although they involve some catastrophe
exposure) and thus reduce the volatility in results of operations caused by
catastrophes.
4
6
The following table sets out our gross premiums written and number of
contracts written by type of reinsurance.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2000 1999
------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------
PERCENTAGE OF PERCENTAGE OF
PREMIUMS PREMIUMS NUMBER OF PREMIUMS PREMIUMS NUMBER OF
TYPE OF REINSURANCE ASSUMED WRITTEN WRITTEN CONTRACTS WRITTEN WRITTEN CONTRACTS
- --------------------------- -------------- ------------- --------- -------------- ------------- ---------
(IN THOUSANDS) (IN THOUSANDS)
Catastrophe
excess-of-loss.......... $79,243 84.5% 1,676 $83,445 85.9% 1,858
Risk excess-of-loss....... 4,416 4.7% 132 4,989 5.1% 163
Marine reinsurance........ 259 0.3% 86 371 0.4% 124
Retrocessional
reinsurance............. 2,676 2.9% 82 3,198 3.3% 87
Aviation(1)............... 5,904 6.3% 25 4,222 4.3% 24
Other..................... 1,259 1.3% 51 937 1.0% 59
------- ----- ----- ------- ----- -----
Total........... $93,757 100.0% 2,052 $97,162 100.0% 2,315
======= ===== ===== ======= ===== =====
- ---------------
(1) In each of 2000 and 1999, aviation included two aviation contracts and two
satellite contracts, written on a pro-rata basis.
CATASTROPHE EXCESS-OF-LOSS REINSURANCE. Catastrophe excess-of-loss
reinsurance provides coverage to a primary insurer when aggregate claims and
claim expenses from a single occurrence of a peril, covered under a portfolio of
primary insurance contracts written by the primary insurer, exceed the
attachment point specified in the reinsurance contract with the primary insurer.
The primary insurer can then recover up to the limit of reinsurance it has
elected to buy for each layer. Once a layer is exhausted by collection of
claims, the primary insurer generally buys another reinsurance layer for the
same liability coverage, i.e., a reinstatement, for an additional premium. Most
of our policies are limited to losses occurring during the policy term.
RISK EXCESS-OF-LOSS REINSURANCE. We also write risk excess-of-loss
property reinsurance. This reinsurance responds to a loss of the reinsured in
excess of its retention level on a single "risk", rather than to aggregate
losses for all covered risks, as does catastrophe reinsurance. A "risk" in this
context might mean the insurance coverage on one building or a group of
buildings or the insurance coverage under a single policy which the reinsured
treats as a single risk. Most of the risk excess treaties in which we
participate contain a relatively low loss-per-event limit on our liability.
MARINE REINSURANCE. We also write short-tail marine reinsurance for
selected international insurers. Although they primarily involve property
damage, certain marine risks may involve casualty coverage arising from the same
event causing the property damage. Coverage is solely written on an
excess-of-loss basis, so events likely to cause a claim will occur less
frequently. Such events might include the destruction of a drilling platform or
damage to a vessel and/or its contents.
AVIATION REINSURANCE. We also write a small amount of short-tail aviation
reinsurance on proportional and excess-of-loss bases. Although they primarily
involve property damage, certain aviation risks may involve casualty coverage
arising from the same event causing the property damage. Coverage is generally
written in excess of a substantial attachment point, so events likely to cause a
claim will occur infrequently but be relatively severe. In 2000, the majority of
this business was written in two pro rata aviation contracts, where the
underlying insurance is written on an excess-of-loss basis, and two pro rata
satellite contracts.
POLICY FEATURES. Historically, our policies have been written for a
one-year period, and generally without experience-based adjustments. During the
period 1997 to 1999, the trend in the industry was towards multi-year policies.
In particular, some of the insureds renewing policies in 1999 specifically
requested longer periods, in part to address concerns regarding Y2K risks. A
proportion of our policies in 1999 were for terms of fifteen to eighteen months.
However, commencing in the second quarter of 1999, we declined renewals and
submissions of new business which were on a multi-year basis, because of the
general inadequacy of market pricing. In addition, during the same period, the
industry offered a variety of experienced-based incentives such as "no claims"
bonuses and profit commissions. A proportion of our policies included some or
all of these incentives.
5
7
GEOGRAPHIC DIVERSIFICATION.
Since inception, we have sought to diversify our exposure across geographic
zones around the world in order to obtain the optimum spread of risk. We divide
our markets into geographic zones and limit coverage we are willing to provide
for any risk located in a particular zone, so as to maintain our aggregate loss
exposure from all contracts covering risks believed to be located in that zone,
to a predetermined level.
The predetermined levels are established annually on the basis of, and as a
proportion of, shareholders' investment. If a proposed reinsurance program would
cause the limit then in effect to be exceeded, the program would be declined,
regardless of its desirability, unless we utilize retrocessional coverage (i.e.,
IPC purchasing reinsurance, such as our proportional reinsurance facility),
thereby reducing the net aggregate exposure to the maximum limit permitted, or
less. If we were to suffer a net financial loss in any fiscal year, thus
reducing shareholders' investment, the limits per zone would be reduced in the
next year, with the possible effect that we would thereafter reduce existing
business in a zone exceeding such limit.
Currently, we have divided the United States into 8 geographic zones and
our other markets, including Europe and Japan into a total of 18 zones. We
designate as zones geographic areas which, based on historic catastrophe loss
experience reflecting actual catastrophe events and property development
patterns, we believe are most likely to absorb a large percentage of losses from
one catastrophic event. These zones are determined using computer modeling
techniques and underwriting assessments. The zones may overlap and vary in size
with the level of population density and commercial development in a particular
area. The zones with the greatest exposure written are in the United States, in
particular the Atlantic and North-Central regions, and the United Kingdom. The
parameters of these geographic zones are subject to periodic review and change.
We recognize that events may affect more than one zone, and to the extent
we have accepted reinsurance from a ceding insurer with a loss exposure in more
than one zone, we will consider such potential loss in testing its limits in all
such affected zones. For example, the program for a U.S. national carrier
typically will be subject to limits in each U.S. zone. A program with worldwide
exposure will also be subject to limits in U.S. zones or other zones around the
world, as applicable. This results in very substantial "double-counting" of
exposures in determining utilization of an aggregate within a given zone.
Consequently, the total sum insured will be less than the sums of utilized
aggregates for all of the zones.
The following table sets out gross premiums written, number of written
contracts and the percentage of our premiums allocated to the zones of coverage
exposure.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2000 1999
------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------
PERCENTAGE OF PERCENTAGE OF
PREMIUMS PREMIUMS NUMBER OF PREMIUMS PREMIUMS NUMBER OF
GEOGRAPHIC AREA(1) WRITTEN WRITTEN CONTRACTS WRITTEN WRITTEN CONTRACTS
- ------------------ -------------- ------------- --------- -------------- ------------- ---------
(IN THOUSANDS) (IN THOUSANDS)
United States............ $39,107 41.7% 806 $37,043 38.1% 847
Worldwide(2)............. 14,992 16.0% 227 14,570 15.0% 277
Worldwide (excluding the
U.S.)(3)............... 4,827 5.2% 104 5,739 5.9% 124
Europe (including the
U.K.).................. 19,144 20.4% 444 19,432 20.0% 457
Japan.................... 4,175 4.5% 71 3,492 3.6% 65
Australia/New Zealand.... 5,188 5.5% 134 7,774 8.0% 161
Other.................... 6,324 6.7% 266 9,112 9.4% 384
------- ----- ----- ------- ----- -----
Total.......... $93,757 100.0% 2,052 $97,162 100.0% 2,315
======= ===== ===== ======= ===== =====
6
8
- ---------------
NOTES:
(1) Except as otherwise noted, each of these categories includes contracts that
cover risks primarily located in the designated geographic area.
(2) Includes contracts that cover risks primarily in two or more countries,
including the United States.
(3) Includes contracts that cover risks primarily in two or more countries,
excluding the United States.
The following table sets out our gross aggregate in-force liability
allocated to various zones of coverage exposure at January 1, 2001 and 2000. Our
aggregate limits will be reduced to the extent that business is ceded to the
proportional reinsurance facility (see "Retrocessional Reinsurance" below).
AGGREGATE LIMIT OF
LIABILITY AT JANUARY 1,
--------------------------------
GEOGRAPHIC AREA(1) 2001 2000
- ------------------ -------------- --------------
(IN THOUSANDS) (IN THOUSANDS)
United States
New England............................................... $277,817 $282,887
Atlantic.................................................. 314,165 337,982
Gulf...................................................... 303,091 306,848
North Central............................................. 291,484 331,575
Mid West.................................................. 307,440 317,468
West...................................................... 294,937 294,663
Alaska.................................................... 116,153 108,912
Hawaii.................................................... 121,979 122,681
Total United States(2)............................ 434,111 494,442
Canada...................................................... 49,679 57,227
Worldwide(3)................................................ 65,814 85,560
Worldwide (excluding the U.S.)(4)........................... 75,341 72,989
Europe (including U.K.)..................................... 274,708 312,364
Japan....................................................... 83,830 100,033
Australia/New Zealand....................................... 69,684 119,888
Other....................................................... 48,613 85,049
- ---------------
NOTES:
(1) Except as otherwise noted, each of these aggregates includes contracts that
cover risks located primarily in the designated geographic area.
(2) The United States in aggregate is not a zone. The degree of
"double-counting" in the 8 U.S. zones is illustrated by the relation of the
aggregate in-force limit of liability for the United States as compared to
the individual limits of liability in the 8 zones.
(3) Includes contracts that cover risks primarily in two or more countries,
including the United States.
(4) Includes contracts that cover risks primarily in two or more countries,
excluding the United States.
The effectiveness of geographic zone limits in managing risk exposure
depends on the degree to which an actual event is confined to the zone in
question and on our ability to determine the actual location of the risks
believed to be covered under a particular reinsurance program. Accordingly,
there can be no assurance that risk exposure in any particular zone will not
exceed that zone's limits.
With respect to U.S. exposures, we use the computer-based systems described
below as one tool in estimating the aggregate losses that could occur under all
our contracts covering U.S. risks as a result of a range of potential
catastrophic events. By evaluating the effects of various potential events, we
monitor
7
9
whether the risks that could be accepted within a zone are appropriate in light
of other risks already affecting such zone and, in addition, whether the level
of our zone limits is acceptable.
UNDERWRITING AND PROGRAM LIMITS
In addition to geographic zones, we seek to limit our overall exposure to
risk by pursuing a disciplined underwriting strategy which limits the amount of
reinsurance we will supply in accordance with a particular program or contract,
so as to achieve diversification within and across geographical zones. When we
began operations, we maintained program limits of $15 million and contract
limits of $5 million. In 1996, program limits were increased to $25 million. In
a small number of instances we have exceeded these limits. We also attempt to
distribute our exposure across a range of attachment points i.e., the amount of
claims that have to be borne by the ceding insurer before our reinsurance
coverage applies. Attachment points vary and are based upon an assessment of the
ceding insurer's market share of property perils in any given geographic zone to
which the contract relates, as well as the capital needs of the ceding insurer.
Prior to reviewing any program proposal, we consider the appropriateness of
the cedent, including the quality of its management and its capital and risk
management strategy. In addition, we require that each proposed reinsurance
program received includes information on the nature of the perils to be included
and detailed aggregate information as to the location or locations of the risks
covered under the catastrophe contract. Additional information would also
include the cedent's loss history for the perils being reinsured, together with
relevant underwriting considerations which would impact exposures to catastrophe
reinsurers. We first evaluate exposures on new programs in light of the overall
zone limits in any given catastrophe zone, together with program limits and
contract limits, to ensure a balanced and disciplined underwriting approach. If
the program meets all these initial underwriting criteria, we then evaluate the
proposal in terms of its risk/reward profile to assess the adequacy of the
proposed pricing and its potential impact on our overall return on capital. Once
a program meets our requirements for underwriting and pricing, the program would
then be authorized for acceptance.
We extensively use sophisticated modeling and other technology in our
underwriting techniques. Each submission received is registered on the "GENIUS"
reinsurance data system we use for both underwriting and aggregate control
purposes. This system enables both management and underwriters to have on-line
information regarding both individual exposures and zonal aggregate
concentrations. All submissions are recorded to determine and monitor their
status as being pending, authorized, or bound.
In addition to the reinsurance data system, we use computer modeling to
measure and estimate loss exposure under both simulated and actual loss
scenarios and in comparing exposure portfolios to both single and multiple
events. Since 1993, we have contracted Applied Insurance Research for the use of
CATMAP(R)/2 as part of our modeling approach. These computer-based loss modeling
systems utilize A.M. Best's data and direct exposure information obtained from
our clients, to assess each client's catastrophe management approach and
adequacy of their program's protection. Modeling is part of the underwriting
criteria for catastrophe exposure pricing. The majority of our client base also
use one or more of the various modeling consulting firms in their exposure
management analysis. In addition, we sometimes perform or contract for
additional modeling analysis when reviewing our major commitments. The
combination of reinsurance system information, together with CATMAP(R)/2
modeling, enables us to monitor and control our acceptance of exposure on a
global basis.
Generally, the proposed terms of coverage, including the premium rate and
retention level for excess-of-loss contracts, are set by the lead reinsurer and
agreed to by the client and broker. On placements requiring large market
capacity, typically the broker strives to achieve a consensus of proposed terms
with many participating underwriters to ensure placement. On both U.S. and
non-U.S. business, we act in many cases as a lead or consensus lead reinsurer.
When not the lead, we sometimes actively negotiate additional terms or
conditions. If we elect to authorize a participation, the underwriter will
specify the percentage or monetary participation in each layer, and will execute
a slip to be followed by a contract to formalize coverage.
We have a procedure for underwriting control to ensure that all acceptances
are made in accordance with our underwriting policy and aggregate control. Each
underwriting individual is given an underwriting
8
10
authority, limits above which must be submitted for approval to the chief
executive officer. All new acceptances are reviewed at least weekly by the chief
executive officer.
Generally, about 60% of premiums we write each year are for contracts which
have effective dates in January, about 20% in April, about 10% in July and the
remainder at other times throughout the year. Premiums are generally due in
installments over the contract term, with each installment generally received
within 30 days after the due date.
RETROCESSIONAL REINSURANCE
Effective January 1, 1999, we arranged a proportional reinsurance facility
for IPCRe through two leading intermediaries. The business covered by this
facility is property catastrophe business written by IPCRe. The facility
provides coverage of up to $50 million in each of at least 5 named zones, and
potentially other zones of our choosing, provided that the risks in those zones
do not accumulate with those in the named zones. The United States and the
Caribbean are excluded zones. The named zones are the United Kingdom; Europe
(excluding the U.K.); Australia / New Zealand; Japan and Canada. Business ceded
to the facility is solely at our discretion. Within these limitations, we may
designate the treaties to be included in the facility, subject to IPCRe
retaining at least 50% of the risk. The premium ceded is pro rata, less
brokerage, taxes and an override commission. A subsidiary of AIG, as a
participating reinsurer, has a 10% participation on a direct basis. Most
reinsurers participating in the facility have ratings of AA or above, and the
minimum rating is A. Effective January 1, 2000 this facility was renewed on the
same terms, although only 92% participation was bound. For 2001, the facility
was again renewed on the same terms, but with only 61.5% bound. Where
participation is less than 100%, IPCRe will co-participate on the balance, and
net exposures will be proportionately higher on those treaties ceded to the
facility.
MARKETING
Our customers generally are sophisticated, long-established insurers who
understand the risks involved and who desire the assurance not only that claims
will be paid but that reinsurance will continue to be available after claims are
paid. Catastrophic losses can be expected to affect financial results adversely
from time to time, and we believe that financial stability and growth of capital
(as well as service and innovation) are essential for creating long-term
relationships with clients, and that such relationships are key to creating
long-term value to the Company and our shareholders. During 2000, no single
ceding insurer accounted for more than 6.1% of our gross premiums written.
We market our reinsurance products worldwide through non-exclusive
relationships with more than 50 of the leading reinsurance brokers active in the
U.S. and non-U.S. markets for property catastrophe reinsurance. In addition,
from 1993 to January, 2000 our products were marketed in Europe through IPCRe
Services. As noted above, IPCRe Services ceased operations in January 2000,
because consolidation among our clients and brokers has reduced the need to
maintain a physical presence in the U.K. in order to promote our services.
Based on premiums written during the year ended December 31, 2000, the five
brokers from which we derive the largest portions of our business (with the
approximate percentage of our business derived from such broker) are Marsh &
McLennan and affiliates (35.8%), Aon Corp. and affiliates (19.7%), Willis Faber
(11.4%), Benfield Greig (6.5%), and Herbert Clough (5.7%). During the year ended
December 31, 2000, we had in force reinsurance contracts with only five ceding
companies which were not derived from a reinsurance broker; otherwise, our
products are marketed exclusively through brokers. Of the total premiums
attributable to the five largest producing brokers referred to above, 1.1% was
attributable to brokers affiliated with the insurers seeking coverage. All
brokerage transactions are entered into on an arm's-length basis.
Our brokers perform data collection, contract preparation and other
administrative tasks, enabling us to market our reinsurance products cost
effectively by maintaining a small staff. By relying largely on reinsurance
brokers to market our products, we are able to avoid the expense and regulatory
complications of worldwide offices, thereby minimizing fixed costs associated
with marketing activities. We believe that by maintaining close relationships
with brokers, we are able to obtain access to a broad range of potential
reinsureds. We meet frequently in Bermuda and elsewhere outside the United
States with brokers and senior representatives of
9
11
clients and prospective clients. All contract submissions are approved in
IPCRe's executive offices in Bermuda, and we do not believe that conducting our
operations in Bermuda has adversely affected our marketing activities in light
of the client base we have attracted and retained.
RESERVES
Under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, we are not permitted
to establish loss reserves with respect to our property catastrophe business
until the occurrence of an event which may give rise to a claim. Once such an
event occurs, we establish reserves based upon estimates of total losses
incurred by the ceding insurers as a result of the event and our estimate of the
portion of such loss we have reinsured. With respect to our non-catastrophe
business, we are permitted to establish loss reserves as determined by a
historical loss development pattern. Only loss reserves applicable to losses
incurred up to the reporting date may be set aside, with no allowance for the
provision of a contingency reserve to account for expected future losses. Claims
arising from future catastrophic events can be expected to require the
establishment of substantial reserves from time to time. Our reserves are
adjusted as we receive notices of claims and proofs of loss from reinsureds and
as estimates of severity of damages and our share of the total loss are revised.
We also establish reserves for losses incurred as a result of an event
known but not reported to us. These incurred but not reported ("IBNR") reserves
are established for both catastrophe and other losses. To estimate the portion
of loss and loss adjustment expenses relating to these claims for the year, we
review our portfolio of business to determine where the potential for loss may
exist. Also, various loss forecasting models and industry loss data, as well as
actual experience, knowledge of the business written by us and general market
trends in the reinsurance industry, are considered. We have contracted a leading
worldwide independent firm of actuaries to conduct a review of reserves on a
semi-annual basis.
Generally, reserves are established without regard to whether we may
subsequently contest the loss. Our policy is to establish reserves for reported
losses based upon reports received from ceding companies, supplemented by our
reserve estimates.
Loss reserves represent our estimates, at a given point in time, of the
ultimate settlement and administration costs of claims incurred, and it is
possible that the ultimate liability may exceed or be less than such estimates.
Such estimates are not precise in that, among other things, they are based on
predictions of future developments and estimates of future trends in claim
severity and frequency and other variable factors such as inflation and currency
exchange rates. During the claim settlement period, it often becomes necessary
to refine and adjust the estimates of liability on a claim either upward or
downward, and any such adjustment would affect our results of operations in the
period when the adjustment is determined. Even after such adjustments, ultimate
liability may materially exceed or be less than the revised estimates. Moreover,
reserve estimates by relatively new property catastrophe reinsurers, such as
IPCRe, may be inherently more volatile than the reserve estimates of a reinsurer
with a stable volume of business and an established claim history. In contrast
to casualty losses, which frequently can be determined only through lengthy,
unpredictable litigation, property losses tend to be reported promptly and
settled within a shorter period of time.
INVESTMENTS
GENERAL. Our current investment strategy is defined primarily by the need
to safeguard our capital, since we believe that the risks inherent in
catastrophe reinsurance should not be augmented by a speculative investment
policy. For this reason our investment policy is conservative with a strong
emphasis on the quality of investments. At December 31, 2000, other than cash,
our investments consisted of fixed maturity securities, none of which had a
rating of less than A, and shares of stock in the S & P 500 companies. Corporate
bonds represented 50% of total fixed maturity investments at December 31, 2000
and of these 50% were issued by U.S. corporations and 50% by non-U.S.
corporations, respectively. Our investment policy also stresses diversification
and at December 31, 2000, only the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Home Loan
Mortgage Corp. were individual issuers whose securities represented more than 5%
of our portfolio. In addition to these parameters, guidelines are also set which
limit permitted issuers, the amount of non-U.S. dollar denominated securities
and the target duration of the portfolio.
10
12
The following table summarizes the fair value of our investments and cash
and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2000 and 1999:
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------
TYPE OF INVESTMENT 2000 1999
- ------------------ -------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS)
Fixed Maturities Available for Sale
U.S. Government and government agencies.............. $126,792 $ 79,970
Other governments.................................... 78,898 131,637
Corporate............................................ 263,522 235,588
Supranational entities............................... 54,448 40,631
-------- --------
523,660 487,826
Equities, available for sale........................... 65,462 78,859
Cash and cash equivalents.............................. 9,409 28,069
-------- --------
$598,531 $594,754
======== ========
Our investment guidelines are reviewed periodically and are subject to
change at the discretion of the Board of Directors.
MATURITY AND DURATION OF PORTFOLIO. Currently, we maintain a target
modified duration for the portfolio of between 1.25 years and 3.75 years
although actual maturities of individual securities vary from less than one year
to a maximum of eight years for fixed maturity securities, and ten years for
money-market securities. At December 31, 2000 the fixed maturity portfolio
(including cash and cash equivalents within such portfolio) had an average
maturity of 3.1 years and an average modified duration of 2.7 years. We believe
that, given the relatively high quality of our portfolio, adequate market
liquidity exists to meet our cash demands.
The following table summarizes the fair value by maturities of our fixed
maturity investment portfolio as of December 31, 2000 and 1999. For this
purpose, maturities reflect contractual rights to put or call the securities;
actual maturities may be longer.
DECEMBER 31,
-------------------
2000 1999
-------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS)
Due in one year or less................................. $ 26,010 $ 56,433
Due after one year through five years................... 482,844 400,844
Due after five years through ten years.................. 14,806 30,549
-------- --------
$523,660 $487,826
======== ========
QUALITY OF DEBT SECURITIES IN PORTFOLIO. Our investment guidelines
stipulate that a majority of the securities be AAA and AA rated, although a
select number of A rated issues is permitted. The primary rating source is
Moody's Investors Service ("Moody's") and, when no Moody's rating is available,
S & P ratings are used.
11
13
The following table summarizes the composition of the fair value of all
cash and fixed maturity investments by rating:
DECEMBER 31,
----------------
2000 1999
------ ------
Cash and cash equivalents......................... 1.8% 5.4%
U.S. Government and government agencies........... 23.8% 15.5%
AAA............................................... 29.0% 30.5%
AA................................................ 28.7% 39.3%
A................................................. 16.7% 9.3%
------ ------
100.0% 100.0%
====== ======
There are no delinquent securities in our investment portfolio.
REAL ESTATE. Our portfolio does not contain any investments in real estate
or mortgage loans.
FOREIGN CURRENCY EXPOSURE. At December 31, 2000 and 1999, most of our
fixed maturity investments were in securities denominated in U.S. dollars, with
the exception of an Australian dollar time deposit in the amount of
approximately U.S. $4 million (equivalent). The investment guidelines permit up
to 25% of the portfolio to be invested in non-U.S. dollar securities. However,
from inception, such investments have been made infrequently and for the purpose
of improving overall portfolio yield. When we do hold non-U.S. dollar
denominated securities, we have entered and may enter into forward foreign
exchange contracts for purposes of hedging our non-U.S. dollar denominated
investment portfolio. In addition, in the event that loss payments must be made
in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, in some cases we will match the
liability with assets denominated in the same currency, thus mitigating the
effect of exchange rate movements on the balance sheet. To date, this strategy
has been used on three occasions.
DERIVATIVES. Our investment policy guidelines provide that financial
futures and options and foreign exchange contracts may not be used in a
speculative manner but may be used, subject to certain numerical limits, as part
of a defensive strategy to protect the market value of the portfolio.
INVESTMENT ADVISORY AND CUSTODIAL SERVICES. Investment advisory and
custodial services are provided to us by subsidiaries of AIG.
COMPETITION
The property catastrophe reinsurance industry is highly competitive. We
compete, and will continue to compete, with insurers and property catastrophe
reinsurers worldwide, many of which have greater financial, marketing and
management resources than us. Some of our competitors are large financial
institutions who have reinsurance divisions, while others are specialty
reinsurance companies. In total, there are several hundred companies writing
reinsurance of different types, including property catastrophe. In a recent
ranking of the world's top 150 companies whose predominant source of income is
generated from property and casualty reinsurance compiled by Standard & Poor's,
IPC ranked 41st. The ranking was based on the amount of paid-up capital and
surplus (i.e., shareholders' investment) at the end of 1999. In particular, we
compete with Bermuda-based reinsurers, including XL Mid Ocean Re., Renaissance
Reinsurance Ltd., Partner Reinsurance Company Ltd., LaSalle Re Limited, Tempest
Reinsurance Company Limited, and with established international reinsurers
outside Bermuda such as General Re, American Re Corporation, Munich Re, Swiss
Reinsurance Company and Lloyd's. In addition, there may be established companies
or new companies of which we are not aware that may be planning to enter the
property catastrophe reinsurance market or existing reinsurers that may be
planning to commit capital to this market. In addition, Lloyd's determined in
1993 to allow its syndicates to accept capital from corporate investors.
Competition in the types of reinsurance business that we underwrite is based on
many factors, including premium charges and other terms and conditions offered,
services provided, ratings assigned by independent rating agencies, speed of
claims payment, claims experience, perceived financial strength and experience
and reputation of the reinsurer in the line of reinsurance to be written. Many
of the reinsurers who have entered the Bermuda and London-
12
14
based reinsurance markets have or could have more capital than us. The full
effect of this additional capital on the reinsurance market may not be known for
some time. No assurance can be given as to what impact this additional capital
will ultimately have on terms or conditions of the reinsurance contracts of the
types written by us.
In September 1996, IPCRe was rated by A.M. Best Company, Inc. ("A.M.
Best"), who gave it an initial rating of A+ (Superior). This rating was affirmed
by A.M. Best in all subsequent years. In July, 1997 S & P assigned financial
strength and counter-party credit ratings of A+, which were also affirmed in all
subsequent years. Prior to 1996, IPCRe was not rated by any rating agency.
During 1999, these ratings were extended to IPCRe Europe. The rating received
from A.M. Best represents the second highest rating on their rating scale. The
rating received from S & P represents the fifth highest rating on their rating
scale. Such ratings are based on factors of concern to cedents and brokers and
are not directed toward the protection of investors. Such ratings are neither a
rating of securities nor a recommendation to buy, hold or sell such securities.
While we believe that IPCRe's current ratings are of benefit, some of our
principal competitors have a rating equal to or greater than that of IPCRe.
Insurance ratings are one factor used by brokers and cedents in the United
States as a means of assessing the financial strength and quality of reinsurers.
In addition, a cedent's own rating may be adversely affected by the lack of a
rating of its reinsurer. IPCRe is not licensed or admitted as an insurer in any
jurisdiction in the United States and, as a consequence, must generally post
letters of credit or other security to cover outstanding claims of, or unearned
premiums with respect to, ceding insurers in the United States to enable such
insurers to obtain favorable regulatory capital treatment of their reinsurance.
See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations -- Liquidity and Capital Resources", contained in the Annual Report.
We are aware of a number of new, proposed or potential legislative or
industry changes that may impact upon the worldwide demand for property
catastrophe reinsurance. Among other things, over the last few years capital
markets participants, including exchanges and financial intermediaries, have
developed financial products such as risk securitizations, intended to compete
with traditional reinsurance, the usage of which has grown in volume. In
addition, the tax policy of the countries in which our clients operate can
affect the demand for reinsurance. We are also aware of many potential
initiatives by capital market participants to produce additional alternative
products that may compete with the existing catastrophe reinsurance markets. We
are unable to predict the extent to which the foregoing new, proposed or
potential initiatives may affect the demand for our products or the risks which
may be available for us to consider underwriting.
EMPLOYEES
As of January 1, 2001, we employed 13 people on a full-time basis including
our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and two underwriters. We
believe that employee relations are good. None of our employees are subject to
collective bargaining agreements, and we know of no current efforts to implement
such agreements at IPC.
Many of our employees, including most of our senior management, are
employed pursuant to work permits granted by the Bermuda authorities. These
permits expire at various times over the next several years. We have no reason
to believe that these permits would not be extended upon request at their
respective expirations. However, new regulations enacted by the Minister of
Labour and Home Affairs in Bermuda have imposed limitations on the number of
times permits for non-key employees are renewed, to a maximum of six years.
REGULATION
BERMUDA -- THE INSURANCE ACT OF 1978, AS AMENDED, AND RELATED REGULATIONS (THE
"INSURANCE ACT").
IPCRe is a registered Bermuda insurance company and is subject to
regulation and supervision in Bermuda. The applicable Bermudian statutes and
regulations generally are designed to protect insureds and ceding insurance
companies rather than shareholders. Among other things, such statutes and
regulations require IPCRe to maintain minimum levels of capital and surplus;
impose restrictions on the amount and type of investments it may hold; prescribe
solvency standards that it must meet; limit transfers of ownership of its
13
15
capital shares and provide for the performance of certain periodic examinations
of IPCRe and its financial condition. These statutes and regulations may, in
effect, restrict the ability of IPCRe to write new business or, as indicated
below, distribute funds to the Company. The Insurance Act, which regulates the
insurance business of IPCRe, provides that no person shall carry on an insurance
business in or from within Bermuda unless registered as an insurer under the
Insurance Act by the Minister of Finance (the "Minister"). The Minister, in
deciding whether to grant registration, has broad discretion to act as he thinks
fit in the public interest. The Minister is required by the Insurance Act to
determine whether the applicant is a fit and proper body to be engaged in the
insurance business and, in particular, whether it has, or has available to it,
adequate knowledge and expertise. The registration of an applicant as an insurer
is subject to its complying with the terms of its registration and such other
conditions as the Minister may impose at any time. As a holding company, IPC
Holdings is not subject to Bermuda insurance regulations.
An Insurance Advisory Committee appointed by the Minister advises him on
matters connected with the discharge of his functions and sub-committees thereof
supervise and review the law and practice of insurance in Bermuda, including
reviews of accounting and administrative procedures.
The Insurance Act imposes on Bermuda insurance companies solvency and
liquidity standards and auditing and reporting requirements and grants to the
Minister powers to supervise, investigate and intervene in the affairs of
insurance companies. Significant aspects of the Bermuda insurance regulatory
framework are set forth below.
CLASSIFICATION OF INSURERS. In March 1995, the Insurance Act was amended
to establish four classes of insurers in the area of general business. IPCRe
applied to and obtained from the Registrar of Companies in Bermuda (the
"Registrar"), who is the chief administrative officer under the Insurance Act,
approval as a Class 4 insurer, having met the requirement of a minimum of $100
million of total statutory capital and surplus. The requirements of a Class 4
insurer -- the highest available class -- are intended to assure the world
insurance market of the license-holder's long-term stability and sound financial
condition. This classification prohibits IPCRe from writing long-term business
without the Minister's approval and, in the event a proposed dividend is in
excess of 25% of its total statutory capital and surplus, file an affidavit as
to solvency, declaring that it will remain in compliance with the solvency
margin and minimum capital and surplus requirements. In addition, dividends are
prohibited where payment would cause IPCRe to be in breach of the Insurance Act.
The solvency margin requirement is the greatest of $100 million, 50% of net
premiums written (with maximum credit of 25% for reinsurance ceded) or 15% of
loss and loss expense reserves. If IPCRe were to reduce its total statutory
capital by more than 15% of that contained in its Statutory Financial Statements
for the prior fiscal year, it would be required to apply to the Minister for
approval and file certain required information, including an affidavit declaring
that it would remain in compliance with the required minimum solvency margin and
liquidity ratio. As of January 1, 2001, IPCRe would have been able to pay
approximately $139 million in dividends in accordance with the foregoing
restrictions. We do not expect these requirements to impose any significant
limitations on the Company's liquidity, based on IPCRe's current capital
structure and operating results. See note 15 to the Company's consolidated
financial statements, contained in the Annual Report.
CANCELLATION OF INSURER'S REGISTRATION. An insurer's registration may be
cancelled by the Minister on certain grounds specified in the Insurance Act,
including failure of the insurer to comply with its obligations under the
Insurance Act or, if in the opinion of the Minister after consultation with the
Insurance Advisory Committee, the insurer has not been carrying on business in
accordance with sound insurance principles.
INDEPENDENT APPROVED AUDITOR. Every registered insurer must appoint an
independent auditor who will annually audit and report on the Statutory
Financial Statements and the Statutory Financial Return of the insurer, which
are required to be filed annually with the Registrar. The independent auditor of
the insurer must be approved by the Minister and may be the same person or firm
which audits the insurer's financial statements and reports for presentation to
its shareholders.
LOSS RESERVE SPECIALIST. IPCRe, as a registered Class 4 insurer, is
required to submit an annual loss reserve opinion when filing the annual
Statutory Financial Return. This opinion must be issued by a Loss Reserve
Specialist, who will normally be a qualified property/casualty actuary, approved
by the Minister.
14
16
STATUTORY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. An insurer must prepare annual Statutory
Financial Statements. The Insurance Act prescribes rules for the preparation and
substance of such Statutory Financial Statements (which include, in statutory
form, a balance sheet, income statement, and a statement of capital and surplus,
and notes thereto). The insurer is required to give detailed information and
analyses regarding premiums, claims, reinsurance and investments. The Statutory
Financial Statements are not prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles ("U.S. GAAP") and are distinct from the financial
statements prepared for presentation to the insurer's shareholders under the
Companies Act 1981 of Bermuda, which may be prepared in accordance with U.S.
GAAP. A Class 4 insurer is required to submit the annual Statutory Financial
Statements as part of the annual Statutory Financial Return.
MINIMUM SOLVENCY MARGIN. The Insurance Act provides that the statutory
assets of an insurer must exceed its statutory liabilities by at least the
prescribed minimum solvency margin which varies with the class of the insurer
and the insurer's premiums written and loss reserve level. As indicated above,
the solvency margin requirement for a Class 4 insurer is the greatest of $100
million, 50% of net premiums written (with maximum credit of 25% for reinsurance
ceded) or 15% of loss and loss expense reserves. See note 15 to the Company's
consolidated financial statements contained in the Annual Report, for
information with respect to IPCRe's statutory capital and surplus.
MINIMUM LIQUIDITY RATIO. The Insurance Act provides a minimum liquidity
ratio for general business. An insurer engaged in general business is required
to maintain the value of its relevant assets at not less than 75% of the amount
of its relevant liabilities. Relevant assets include cash and time deposits,
quoted investments, unquoted bonds and debentures, first liens on real estate,
investment income due and accrued, accounts and premiums receivable and
reinsurance balances receivable. There are certain categories of assets which,
unless specifically permitted by the Minister, do not automatically qualify as
relevant assets, such as unquoted equity securities, investments in, and
advances to, affiliates, real estate and collateral loans. The relevant
liabilities are total general business insurance reserves and total other
liabilities less deferred income tax and sundry liabilities (by interpretation,
those not specifically defined).
ANNUAL STATUTORY FINANCIAL RETURN. IPCRe is required to file a Statutory
Financial Return with the Registrar no later than four months after its
financial year end (unless specifically extended). The Statutory Financial
Return includes, among other matters, a report of the approved independent
auditor on the Statutory Financial Statements of the insurer; a declaration of
the statutory ratios; a solvency certificate; the Statutory Financial Statements
themselves; the opinion of the approved Loss Reserve Specialist and certain
details concerning ceded reinsurance. The solvency certificate and the
declaration of the statutory ratios must be signed by the principal
representative and at least two directors of the insurer who are required to
state whether the Minimum Solvency Margin and, in the case of the solvency
certificate, the Minimum Liquidity Ratio, have been met, and the independent
approved auditor is required to state whether in its opinion it was reasonable
for the directors to so state and whether the declaration of the statutory
ratios complies with the requirements of the Insurance Act. The Statutory
Financial Return must include the opinion of the Loss Reserve Specialist in
respect of the loss and loss expense provisions of IPCRe. Where an insurer's
accounts have been audited for any purpose other than compliance with the
Insurance Act, a statement to that effect must be filed with the Statutory
Financial Return.
SUPERVISION, INVESTIGATION AND INTERVENTION. The Minister may appoint an
inspector with extensive powers to investigate the affairs of an insurer if the
Minister believes that an investigation is required in the interest of the
insurer's policyholders or persons who may become policyholders. In order to
verify or supplement information otherwise provided to him, the Minister may
direct an insurer to produce documents or information relating to matters
connected with the insurer's business.
If it appears to the Minister that there is a risk of the insurer becoming
insolvent, or that it is in breach of the Insurance Act or any conditions
imposed upon its registration, the Minister may, among other things, direct the
insurer not to take on any new insurance business; not to vary any insurance
contract if the effect would be to increase the insurer's liabilities; not to
make certain investments; to realize certain investments; to maintain in
Bermuda, or transfer to the custody of a Bermuda bank, certain assets; not to
declare or pay any
15
17
dividends or other distributions or to restrict the making of such payments;
and/or to limit its premium income.
An insurer is required to maintain a principal office in Bermuda and to
appoint and maintain a principal representative in Bermuda. For the purpose of
the Insurance Act, the principal office of IPCRe is at our offices in Pembroke,
Bermuda and the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer is the principal
representative of IPCRe. Without a reason acceptable to the Minister, an insurer
may not terminate the appointment of its principal representative, and the
principal representative may not cease to act as such, unless 30 days' notice in
writing to the Minister is given of the intention to do so. It is the duty of
the principal representative, within 30 days of his reaching the view that there
is a likelihood of the insurer for which he acts becoming insolvent or its
coming to his knowledge, or his having reason to believe, that an "event" has
occurred, to make a report in writing to the Minister setting out all the
particulars of the case that are available to him. Examples of such an "event"
include failure by the insurer to comply substantially with a condition imposed
upon the insurer by the Minister relating to a solvency margin or a liquidity or
other ratio.
CERTAIN OTHER CONSIDERATIONS. Although IPCRe is incorporated in Bermuda,
it is classified as non-resident of Bermuda for exchange control purposes by the
Bermuda Monetary Authority. Pursuant to its non-resident status, IPCRe may hold
any currency other than Bermuda Dollars and convert that currency into any other
currency (other than Bermuda Dollars) without restriction.
As "exempted" companies, IPC Holdings and IPCRe may not, without the
express authorization of the Bermuda legislature or under a license granted by
the Minister, participate in certain business transactions, including: (i) the
acquisition or holding of land in Bermuda (except that held by way of lease or
tenancy agreement which is required for its business and held for a term not
exceeding 50 years, or which is used to provide accommodation or recreational
facilities for its officers and employees and held with the consent of the
Minister, for a term not exceeding 21 years); (ii) the taking of mortgages on
land in Bermuda in excess of $50,000; or (iii) the carrying on of business of
any kind in Bermuda, except in certain limited circumstances such as doing
business with another exempted undertaking in furtherance of the business of IPC
Holdings or IPCRe (as the case may be) carried on outside Bermuda.
The Bermuda government actively encourages foreign investment in "exempted"
entities like the Company that are based in Bermuda, but do not operate in
competition with local businesses. As well as having no restrictions on the
degree of foreign ownership, the Company and IPCRe are not currently subject to
taxes on their income or dividends or to any foreign exchange controls in
Bermuda. In addition, there currently is no capital gains tax in Bermuda.
UNITED STATES
IPCRe is not admitted to do business in the United States. The insurance
laws of each state of the United States and of many other countries regulate the
sale of insurance and reinsurance within their jurisdictions by alien insurers
and reinsurers such as IPCRe, which are not admitted to do business within such
jurisdictions. With some exceptions, such sale of insurance or reinsurance
within a jurisdiction where the insurer is not admitted to do business is
prohibited. We do not intend to maintain an office or to solicit, advertise,
settle claims or conduct other insurance activities in any jurisdiction other
than Bermuda or Ireland where the conduct of such activities would require that
IPCRe be so admitted.
In addition to the regulatory requirements imposed by the jurisdictions in
which they are licensed, reinsurers' business operations are affected by
regulatory requirements in various states of the United States governing "credit
for reinsurance" which are imposed on their ceding companies. In general, a
ceding company which obtains reinsurance from a reinsurer that is licensed,
accredited or approved by the jurisdiction or state in which the reinsurer files
statutory financial statements is permitted to reflect in its statutory
financial statements a credit in an aggregate amount equal to the liability for
unearned premiums and loss reserves and loss expense reserves ceded to the
reinsurer. IPCRe is not licensed, accredited or approved in any state in the
United States. The great majority of states, however, permit a credit to
statutory surplus resulting from reinsurance obtained from a non-licensed or
non-accredited reinsurer to be offset to the extent that the reinsurer provides
a letter of credit or other acceptable security arrangement. A few states do not
16
18
allow credit for reinsurance ceded to non-licensed reinsurers except in certain
limited circumstances and others impose additional requirements that make it
difficult to become accredited. IPCRe is also subject to excise tax in the
United States for U.S. business, and in certain other jurisdictions.
We do not believe that IPCRe was in violation of insurance laws of any
jurisdiction in the United States. There can be no assurance, however, that
inquiries or challenges to IPCRe's reinsurance activities will not be raised in
the future. We believe that IPCRe's manner of conducting business through our
offices in Bermuda has not materially adversely affected its operations to date.
There can be no assurance, however, that our location, regulatory status or
restrictions on our activities resulting therefrom will not adversely affect our
ability to conduct business in the future.
UNITED KINGDOM
Similarly, IPCRe Services was not registered as an insurer in the United
Kingdom or in any other jurisdiction. We believe that IPCRe Services is not
required to be registered as an insurance company in the United Kingdom, and
that the activities of IPCRe Services did not cause the Company or IPCRe to be
subject to regulation as an insurance company in the United Kingdom.
EUROPEAN UNION
IPCRe Europe is incorporated in Ireland, and as such is subject to
regulations imposed by the European Union.
CERTAIN UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The discussion below is only a general summary of certain United States
federal income tax considerations that are relevant to certain holders of Common
Shares of the Company. It does not address all relevant tax considerations that
may be relevant to holders of Common Shares nor does it address tax
considerations that may be relevant to certain holders. Investors and
prospective investors should consult their own tax advisors concerning federal,
state, local and non-U.S. tax consequences of ownership and disposition of
Common Shares.
TAXATION OF THE COMPANY AND IPCRe. The Company and IPCRe are Bermuda
corporations; neither files United States tax returns. We believe that IPCRe
operates in such a manner that it is not subject to U.S. tax (other than U.S.
excise tax on reinsurance premiums and withholding tax on certain investment
income from U.S. sources) because it does not engage in a trade or business in
the United States. However, because definitive identification of activities
which constitute being engaged in a trade or business in the United States is
not provided by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code") or
regulations or court decisions, there can be no assurance that the Internal
Revenue Service will not contend that the Company and/or IPCRe is engaged in a
trade or business in the United States. If IPCRe were engaged in a trade or
business in the United States (and, if IPCRe were to qualify for benefits under
the income tax treaty between the United States and Bermuda, such trade or
business were attributable to a "permanent establishment" in the United States),
IPCRe would be subject to U.S. tax at regular corporate rates on its income that
is effectively connected with its U.S. trade or business, plus an additional 30%
"branch profits" tax on such income remaining after the regular tax, in which
case the Company's earnings and shareholders' investment could be materially
adversely affected.
Currently, IPCRe pays premium excise taxes in the United States (1%),
Australia (3%), and certain other jurisdictions. From time to time, U.S.
legislation has been proposed which would increase such tax to 4%.
CONTROLLED FOREIGN CORPORATION RULES. Each "United States shareholder" of
a "controlled foreign corporation" ("CFC") who owns shares in the CFC on the
last day of the CFC's taxable year must include in its gross income for United
States federal income tax purposes its pro-rata share of the CFC's "subpart F
income", even if the subpart F income is not distributed. For these purposes,
any U.S. person who owns, directly or indirectly through foreign persons, or is
considered to own under applicable constructive ownership
17
19
rules of the Code, 10% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes
of stock of a foreign corporation will be considered to be a "United States
shareholder". In general, a foreign insurance company such as IPCRe is treated
as a CFC only if such "United States shareholders" collectively own more than
25% of the total combined voting power or total value of the company's stock for
an uninterrupted period of 30 days or more during any tax year. AIG owns 24.4%
of the Common Shares and the AIG Option, although, pursuant to our Bye-laws, the
combined voting power of these shares is limited to less than 10% of the
combined voting power of all shares. We believe that, because of the dispersion
of the Company's share ownership among holders other than AIG and because of the
restrictions on transfer, issuance or repurchase of the Common Shares,
shareholders of the Company will not be subject to treatment as "United States
shareholders" of a CFC. In addition, because under the Bye-laws no single
shareholder (including AIG) is permitted to exercise as much as 10% of the total
combined voting power of the Company, shareholders of the Company should not be
viewed as "United States shareholders" of a CFC for purposes of these rules.
There can be no assurance, however, that these rules will not apply to
shareholders of the Company. Accordingly, U.S. persons who might, directly or
through attribution, acquire 10% or more of the Common Shares of the Company
should consider the possible application of the CFC rules.
RELATED PERSON INSURANCE INCOME RULES. If IPCRe's related person insurance
income ("RPII") were to equal or exceed 20% of IPCRe's gross insurance income in
any taxable year, a U.S. person who owns Common Shares directly or indirectly on
the last day of the taxable year would likely be required to include in its
income for U.S. federal income tax purposes the shareholder's pro-rata share of
IPCRe's RPII for the taxable year, determined as if such RPII were distributed
proportionately to such United States shareholders at that date regardless of
whether such income is distributed. The amount of RPII earned by IPCRe
(generally, premium and related investment income from the direct or indirect
insurance or reinsurance of any direct or indirect U.S. shareholder of IPCRe or
any person related to such shareholder, including the Company) will depend on a
number of factors, including the geographic distribution of IPCRe's business and
the identity of persons directly or indirectly insured or reinsured by IPCRe.
Although we do not believe that the 20% threshold was met in taxable years from
1994 to 2000, some of the factors which determine the extent of RPII in any
period may be beyond our control. Consequently, there can be no assurance that
IPCRe's RPII will not equal or exceed 20% of its gross insurance income in any
taxable year.
The RPII rules provide that if a shareholder who is a U.S. person disposes
of shares in a foreign insurance corporation that has RPII (even if the amount
of RPII is less than 20% of the corporation's gross insurance income) and in
which U.S. persons own 25% or more of the shares, any gain from the disposition
will generally be treated as ordinary income to the extent of the shareholder's
share of the corporation's undistributed earnings and profits that were
accumulated during the period that the shareholder owned the shares (whether or
not such earnings and profits are attributable to RPII). In addition, such a
shareholder will be required to comply with certain reporting requirements,
regardless of the amount of shares owned by the shareholder. These rules should
not apply to dispositions of Common Shares because the Company is not itself
directly engaged in the insurance business and because proposed U.S. Treasury
regulations appear to apply only in the case of shares of corporations that are
directly engaged in the insurance business. There can be no assurance, however,
that the Internal Revenue Service will interpret the proposed regulations in
this manner or that the applicable regulations will not be promulgated in final
form in a manner that would cause these rules to apply to disposition of Common
Shares.
TAX-EXEMPT SHAREHOLDERS. Tax-exempt entities are generally required to
treat certain subpart F insurance income, including RPII, that is includible in
income by the tax-exempt entity as unrelated business taxable income.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Pursuant to an administrative services agreement with American
International Company, Limited ("AICL"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of AIG, the
Company and IPCRe are allocated office space in AICL's building in Bermuda and
the Company's principal executive offices are located there. The address of the
principal executive offices is American International Building, 29 Richmond
Road, Pembroke HM 08, Bermuda and our telephone number is (441) 298-5100.
18
20
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We will be subject to litigation and arbitration in the ordinary course of
our business. We are not currently involved in any material pending litigation
or arbitration proceedings.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted to a vote of shareholders of the Company during
the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2000.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS
The Common Shares have been included for trading on the Nasdaq National
Market under the symbol "IPCR".
The following table sets out, for the periods indicated, the high and low
sales prices for the Common Shares as reported by the Nasdaq National Market.
Such prices reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or
commission, and do not necessarily represent actual transactions.
HIGH LOW
-------- --------
2000
Quarter ended March 31, 2000.............................. $15.7500 $ 9.7500
Quarter ended June 30, 2000............................... 16.0000 11.2500
Quarter ended September 30, 2000.......................... 18.6875 12.6250
Quarter ended December 31, 2000........................... 22.8750 18.5000
1999
Quarter ended March 31, 1999.............................. $23.1875 $ 19.7500
Quarter ended June 30, 1999............................... 21.6250 17.3750
Quarter ended September 30, 1999.......................... 22.5000 18.5625
Quarter ended December 31, 1999........................... 20.3750 14.2500
As of February 28, 2001, there were 74 holders of record of common shares.
The Company did not pay dividends during 2000. In each of March, June, and
September, 1999, IPC Holdings paid dividends of $0.3175 per common share. In
December 1999, IPC Holdings paid a dividend of $0.16 per common share. The
actual amount and timing of any future dividends is at the discretion of the
Board and is dependent upon our profits and financial requirements, as well as
loss experience, business opportunities and any other factors that the Board
deems relevant. In addition, if we have funds available for distribution, we may
nevertheless determine that such funds should be retained for the purposes of
replenishing capital, expanding premium writings or other purposes. IPC Holdings
is a holding company, whose principal source of income is cash dividends and
other permitted payments from IPCRe. The payment of dividends from IPCRe to IPC
Holdings is restricted under Bermuda law and regulation, including Bermuda
insurance law and under IPCRe's five-year $300 million revolving credit facility
with a syndicate of lenders led by Bank One N.A.(formerly the First National
Bank of Chicago). The credit facility limits the amount of dividends that may be
paid by IPCRe to IPC Holdings to the lesser of i) IPCRe's aggregate positive net
income from March 31, 1998 to the end of the then-current fiscal quarter over
the aggregate amount of all dividends and distributions paid during the same
period, and ii) IPCRe's positive consolidated net income for the four fiscal
quarters then ending over the aggregate amount of all dividends and
distributions paid during the same period.
Under the Insurance Act, IPCRe is prohibited from paying dividends of more
than 25% of its statutory capital and surplus at the beginning of the fiscal
year unless it files an affidavit stating it will continue to meet the required
solvency margin and minimum liquidity ratio requirements, and from declaring or
paying
19
21
dividends without the approval of the Minister of Finance if it failed to meet
its required margins from the previous fiscal year. The maximum amount of
dividends which could be paid by IPCRe to IPC Holdings at January 1, 2001
without such notification is approximately $139,395,000. The Insurance Act also
requires IPCRe to maintain a minimum solvency margin and minimum liquidity ratio
and prohibits dividends which would result in a breach of these requirements. In
addition, IPCRe is prohibited under the Insurance Act from reducing its opening
total statutory capital by more than 15% without the approval of the Minister of
Finance. As a result of these factors, there can be no assurance that our
dividend policy will not change or that we will declare or pay any dividends.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The historical consolidated financial data presented below as of and for
each of the periods ended December 31, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997, and 1996 were
derived from our consolidated financial statements which are incorporated herein
by reference to the Annual Report. The selected consolidated financial data
should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and
related notes thereto, and with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations" also contained in the Annual
Report and incorporated herein by reference.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
STATEMENT OF INCOME DATA
Gross premiums written.......... $ 93,757 $ 97,162 $ 111,265 $ 117,050 $ 111,569
Net premiums earned............. 86,961 94,967 120,125 112,486 113,642
Net investment income........... 31,089 30,327 30,053 29,883 28,883
Loss and loss expenses
incurred...................... 53,661 129,362 61,459 14,708 32,732
Acquisition costs............... 9,049 13,028 16,968 13,487 11,849
General & administrative
expenses(1)................... 11,659 10,052 11,051 10,238 9,250
Realized gains/(losses), net on
investments................... 544 30,355 7,014 (3,616) 3,871
Net income...................... $ 44,225 $ 3,207 $ 67,714 $ 100,320 $ 92,565
Net income per common
share(2)...................... $ 1.73 $ 0.12 $ 2.55 $ 3.79 $ 3.55
Weighted average shares
outstanding(2)................ 25,497,671 25,988,116 26,547,062 26,492,401 26,080,744
Dividend per common share(3).... $ -- $ 1.1125 $ 2.07 $ 3.27 $ 0.8925
OTHER DATA
Loss and loss expense
ratio(4)...................... 61.7% 136.2% 51.2% 13.1% 28.8%
Expense ratio(4)................ 21.1% 23.9% 23.0% 19.7% 19.2%
Combined ratio(4)............... 82.8% 160.1% 74.2% 32.8% 48.0%
Return on average equity(5)..... 8.3% 0.6% 12.4% 19.6% 19.9%
BALANCE SHEET DATA (AT END OF PERIOD)
Total cash and investments...... $ 598,531 $ 594,754 $ 599,981 $ 538,759 $ 503,846
Reinsurance balances
receivable.................... 25,419 21,460 20,747 27,723 25,687
Total assets.................... 647,490 640,942 643,091 585,019 548,081
Reserve for losses and loss
expenses...................... 61,358 111,441 52,226 27,590 28,483
Unearned premiums............... 19,068 16,364 17,602 26,462 21,898
Total shareholders'
investment.................... $ 559,270 $ 504,931 $ 565,952 $ 528,293 $ 496,135
Book value per common
share(6)...................... $ 21.93 $ 19.43 $ 21.32 $ 19.94 $ 19.02
- ---------------
(1) Includes gains and losses arising from foreign exchange.
(2) Net income per common share is based upon the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding during the relevant period, after giving effect to
the Exchange. The weighted average number
20
22
of shares includes common shares and the dilutive effect of the AIG Option
and employee stock options, using the treasury stock method.
(3) Dividend per common share is based on the number of average outstanding
common shares during the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997 and
1996, respectively.
(4) The loss and loss expense ratio is calculated by dividing the losses and
loss expenses incurred by the net premiums earned. The expense ratio is
calculated by dividing the sum of acquisition costs and general and
administrative expenses (excluding gains and losses from foreign exchange)
by net premiums earned. The combined ratio is the sum of the loss and loss
expense ratio and the expense ratio.
(5) Return on average equity equals the annual net income divided by the average
of the shareholders' investment on the first and last day of the respective
period.
(6) Book value per common share is based on the number of common shares
outstanding on the relevant date (after giving effect to the Exchange),
after considering the effect of the AIG Option as of each date presented and
after considering the effect of options granted to employees, calculated on
the basis described in note (2) above.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The information required for this item is incorporated herein by reference
to the narrative contained under the caption "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in the Annual Report.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The information required for this item is incorporated herein by reference
to the section entitled "Management's Discussion and Analysis -- Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk" in the Annual Report.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The information required for this item is incorporated herein by reference
to the consolidated financial statements of the Company contained in the Annual
Report.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
21
23
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The information concerning directors required for this item is incorporated
herein by reference to the information contained under the captions "Election of
Directors", "Executive Officers" and "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership
Reporting Compliance" in the Proxy Statement.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required for this item is incorporated herein by reference
to the information contained under the caption "Executive Compensation" in the
Proxy Statement.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The information required for this item is incorporated herein by reference
to the information contained under the caption "Beneficial Ownership of Common
Shares" in the Proxy Statement.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information required for this item is incorporated herein by reference
to the information contained under the caption "Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions" in the Proxy Statement.
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) Financial Statements and Exhibits
1. Financial Statements
The following Consolidated Financial Statements of IPC Holdings and Report
of Independent Auditors are incorporated herein by reference to pages 11 to 41
of the Annual Report:
Report of Independent Public Accountants
Consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999
Consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998
Consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
Consolidated statements of changes in shareholders' investment for the
years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
Consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
2. Financial Statement Schedules
Report of Independent Public Accountants on Schedules
Schedule II -- Condensed Financial Information of Registrant
Schedule III -- Supplementary Insurance Information of Subsidiary for the
years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998.
Schedule IV -- Supplementary Information concerning Reinsurance for the
years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998.
Certain schedules have been omitted, either because they are not
applicable, or because the information is included in our consolidated financial
statements incorporated by reference to the Annual Report.
22
24
3. Exhibits
EXHIBIT METHOD
NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF FILING
- ------- ----------- ---------
3.1 Memorandum of Association of the Company.................... *
3.2 Amended and Restated Bye-Laws of the Company................ *
3.3 Form of Memorandum of Increase of Share Capital............. *
3.4 Form of Registration Rights Agreement....................... *
4.1 Form of Share Certificate................................... *
10.1 Termination Agreement among the Company and its previous
shareholders................................................ *
10.2 Form of Amended and Restated Option Agreement entered into
between the Company and AIG................................. *
10.3+ Amended and Restated IPC Holdings, Ltd. Stock Option Plan... [ ]N
10.4+ IPCRe Defined Contribution.................................. *
10.5 Amended and Restated Administrative Services Agreement among
the Company, IPCRe and AICL................................. *
10.6 Investment Management Agreement between IPCRe and AIGIC..... **
10.7 Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement between AIGIC and AIGIC
(Europe) (formerly known as Dempsey & Company International
Limited).................................................... *
10.8 Custodial Agreement between AIGTS and IPCRe................. *
10.9+ Retirement Agreement between IPCRe and James P. Bryce....... *
10.10+ Retirement Agreement between IPCRe and Peter J.A. Cozens.... *
10.11+ Amended and Restated IPC Holdings, Ltd. Deferred
Compensation Plan........................................... [ ]
10.12 Credit Agreement between IPCRe Limited, the First National
Bank of Chicago, and other Lenders named therein............ +
10.13 Form of Limited Waiver to Credit Agreement between IPCRe
Limited, BankOne N.A. and other Lenders named therein....... [ ]
11.1 Statement regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings....... Filed herewith
13.1 Portions of the Annual Report incorporated herein by
reference................................................... Filed herewith
21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant.............................. Filed herewith
23.1 Consent of Arthur Andersen.................................. Filed herewith
- ---------------
* Incorporated by reference to the corresponding exhibit in
the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No.
333-00088).
** Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997 (File No.
0-27662).
+ Incorporated by reference to Exhibits 10.1 and 10.2 to the
Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998
(File No. 0-27662).
[ ] Incorporated by reference to Exhibits 10.1 and 10.2 to the
Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999
(File No. 0-27662).
[ Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's
]N Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 (File
0-27662).
+ Management contract or compensatory plan, contract or
arrangement.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K.
No reports were filed on Form 8-K during the fourth quarter of 2000.
23
25
IPC HOLDINGS, LTD.
INDEX TO SCHEDULES
SCHEDULE/REPORT PAGE
--------------- ----
Report of Independent Public Accountants on Schedules......................... 25
Schedule II Consolidated Financial Information of the Registrant........ 26
Schedule III Supplementary Insurance Information of Subsidiary for the 29
years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998................
Schedule IV Supplementary Information concerning Reinsurance for the 30
years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998................
24
26
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS OF
IPC HOLDINGS, LTD.
We have audited in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
the consolidated financial statements of IPC Holdings, Ltd. and subsidiaries
included in IPC Holdings, Ltd.'s annual report to shareholders incorporated by
reference in this Form 10-K, and have issued our report thereon dated February
2, 2001. Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on those
financial statements taken as a whole. The schedules listed in the accompanying
index are the responsibility of the Company's management and are presented for
purposes of complying with the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and
are not part of the basic financial statements. These schedules have been
subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic
financial statements and, in our opinion, fairly state in all material respects
the financial data required to be set forth therein in relation to the basic
financial statements taken as a whole.
ARTHUR ANDERSEN
Hamilton, Bermuda
February 2, 2001
25
27
SCHEDULE II
IPC HOLDINGS, LTD.
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
BALANCE SHEETS
(PARENT COMPANY)
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF UNITED STATES DOLLARS)
AS OF DECEMBER 31,
--------------------
2000 1999
-------- --------
ASSETS:
Cash........................................................ $ 101 $ 22
Investment in wholly-owned subsidiaries..................... 561,462 506,411
Other assets................................................ 420 1,548
-------- --------
$561,983 $507,981
======== ========
LIABILITIES:
Payable to subsidiaries..................................... $ 2,637 $ 2,896
Other liabilities........................................... 76 154
-------- --------
2,713 3,050
-------- --------
SHAREHOLDERS' INVESTMENT:
Share capital -- 2000:25,039,713 shares outstanding, par
value $0.01; 1999: 25,033,932 shares outstanding, par
value $0.01............................................... 250 250
Additional paid in capital.................................. 299,929 299,833
Retained earnings........................................... 254,511 210,286
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)............... 4,580 (5,438)
-------- --------
559,270 504,931
-------- --------
$561,983 $507,981
======== ========
26
28
SCHEDULE II
CONTINUED
IPC HOLDINGS, LTD.
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT -- CONTINUED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(PARENT COMPANY)
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF UNITED STATES DOLLARS)
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Interest income............................................. $ 3 $ 5 $ 15
Expenses:
Operating costs and expenses, net......................... 811 779 889
-------- -------- --------
(Loss)/profit before equity in net income of wholly-owned
subsidiaries.............................................. (808) (774) (874)
Equity in net income of wholly-owned subsidiaries........... 45,033 3,981 68,588
-------- -------- --------
Net income available to common shareholders................. $ 44,225 $ 3,207 $ 67,714
======== ======== ========
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(PARENT COMPANY)
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF UNITED STATES DOLLARS)
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Net income.................................................. $ 44,225 $ 3,207 $ 67,714
-------- -------- --------
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Holding gains, (losses) net on investments during
period................................................. 10,562 (6,024) 28,479
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses included in
net
income................................................. (544) (30,355) (7,014)
-------- -------- --------
10,018 (36,379) 21,465
-------- -------- --------
Comprehensive income (loss)................................. $ 54,243 $(33,172) $ 89,179
======== ======== ========
27
29
SCHEDULE II
CONTINUED
IPC HOLDINGS, LTD.
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT -- CONTINUED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(PARENT COMPANY)
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF UNITED STATES DOLLARS)
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income................................................. $ 44,225 $ 3,207 $ 67,714
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by:
Equity in net income from subsidiaries................... (45,033) (3,981) (68,588)
Changes in, net:
Other assets.......................................... 1,128 29 (295)
Payable to subsidiaries............................... (259) 415 --
Other liabilities..................................... (78) 132 (44)
-------- -------- --------
(17) (198) (1,213)
-------- -------- --------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Additional share capital................................... 96 -- 300
Dividends received from subsidiaries....................... -- 28,000 52,450
Dividends paid to shareholders............................. -- (27,849) (51,820)
-------- -------- --------
96 151 930
-------- -------- --------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents....... 79 (47) (283)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year............... 22 69 352
-------- -------- --------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year..................... $ 101 $ 22 $ 69
======== ======== ========
28
30
SCHEDULE III
IPC HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SUBSIDIARY SUPPLEMENTARY INSURANCE INFORMATION
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF UNITED STATES DOLLARS)
FUTURE POLICY BENEFITS, AMORTIZATION
DEFERRED BENEFITS, CLAIMS, OF DEFERRED
POLICY LOSSES, CLAIMS NET LOSSES AND POLICY OTHER
ACQUISITION AND LOSS UNEARNED PREMIUM INVESTMENT SETTLEMENT ACQUISITION OPERATING
SEGMENT COSTS EXPENSE PREMIUMS REVENUE INCOME EXPENSES COSTS EXPENSES
------- ----------- -------------- -------- -------- ---------- ---------- ------------ ---------
2000:
Property & Similar.... $2,249 $ 61,358 $19,068 $ 86,961 $31,086 $ 53,661 $ 9,049 $8,427
1999:
Property & Similar.... 1,980 111,441 16,364 94,967 30,322 129,362 13,028 8,912
1998:
Property & Similar.... 2,048 52,226 17,602 120,125 30,038 61,459 16,968 9,856
GROSS
PREMIUMS
SEGMENT WRITTEN
------- --------
2000:
Property & Similar.... $ 93,757
1999:
Property & Similar.... 97,162
1998:
Property & Similar.... 111,265
29
31
SCHEDULE IV
REINSURANCE
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF UNITED STATES DOLLARS)
CEDED TO ASSUMED PERCENTAGE OF
OTHER FROM OTHER AMOUNT
GROSS AMOUNT COMPANIES COMPANIES NET AMOUNT(1) ASSUMED TO NET
------------ --------- ---------- ------------- --------------
2000:
Property & Similar................ $-- $4,827 $ 93,757 $ 88,930 105%
1999:
Property & Similar................ -- 3,816 97,162 93,346 104%
1998:
Property & Similar................ -- -- 111,265 111,265 100%
- ---------------
(1) Premiums Written
30
32
IPC HOLDINGS, LTD.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized, in
Pembroke, Bermuda, on the 19th day of March, 2001.
IPC HOLDINGS, LTD.
/s/ JAMES BRYCE
--------------------------------------
By: James P. Bryce
President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities indicated and on the dates indicated.
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
--------- ----- ----
/s/ JOSEPH C.H. JOHNSON Chairman of the Board of March 19, 2001
- ----------------------------------------------------- Directors
Joseph C.H. Johnson
/s/ JAMES BRYCE President, Chief Executive March 19, 2001
- ----------------------------------------------------- Officer and Director
James P. Bryce
/s/ JOHN WEALE Vice President and Chief March 19, 2001
- ----------------------------------------------------- Financial Officer
John R. Weale
/s/ RUSSELL FISHER Deputy Chairman of Board of March 19, 2001
- ----------------------------------------------------- Directors
Russell Fisher
/s/ ANTHONY PILLING Director March 19, 2001
- -----------------------------------------------------
Anthony M. Pilling
/s/ CLARENCE JAMES Director March 19, 2001
- -----------------------------------------------------
Dr. The Honourable Clarence E. James
/s/ FRANK MUTCH Director March 19, 2001
- -----------------------------------------------------
Frank Mutch
31
33
EXHIBIT INDEX
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION METHOD OF FILING
- ------ ----------- ----------------
3.1 Memorandum of Association of the Company *
3.2 Amended and Restated Bye-Laws of the Company *
3.3 Form of Memorandum of Increase of Share Capital *
3.4 Form of Registration Rights Agreement *
4.1 Form of Share Certificate *
10.1 Termination Agreement among the Company and its previous
shareholders *
10.2 Form of Amended and Restated Option Agreement entered into
between the Company and AIG *
10.3 @ Amended and Restated IPC Holdings, Ltd. Stock Option Plan [][]
10.4 @ IPCRe Defined Contribution Plan *
10.5 Amended and Restated Administrative Services Agreement among
the Company, IPCRe and AICL *
10.6 Investment Management Agreement between IPCRe and AIGIC **
10.7 Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement between AIGIC and AIGIC (Europe)
(formerly known as Dempsey & Company International Limited) *
10.8 Custodial Agreement between AIGTS and IPCRe *
10.9 @ Retirement Agreement between IPCRe and James P. Bryce *
10.10 @ Retirement Agreement between IPCRe and Peter J.A. Cozens *
10.11 @ Amended and Restated IPC Holdings, Ltd. Deferred Compensation
Plan *
10.12 Credit Agreement between IPCRe Limited, the First National
Bank of Chicago, and other Lenders named therein +
10.13 Form of Limited Waiver to Credit Agreement between IPCRe
Limited, BankOne N.A. and other Lenders named therein []
11.1 Statement regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings Filed herewith
13.1 Portions of the Annual Report incorporated herein by
reference Filed herewith
21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant Filed herewith
23.1 Consent of Arthur Andersen Filed herewith
* Incorporated by reference to the corresponding exhibit in the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-00088).
** Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 1997 (File No. 0-27662).
+ Incorporated by reference to Exhibits 10.1 and 10.2 to the Company's
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998 (File No. 0-27662).
[] Incorporated by reference to Exhibits 10.1 and 10.2 to the Company's
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999 (File No. 0-27662).
[][] Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1999 (File No. 0-27662).
@ Management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement.