Back to GetFilings.com
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period
Ended March 31, 2005
Commission File Number
1-9750
Sothebys
Holdings, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
Michigan |
|
38-2478409 |
|
(State or other jurisdiction of | |
(I.R.S. Employer | |
incorporation or organization) | |
Identification No.) | |
|
38500 Woodward Avenue, Suite 100 | |
Bloomfield Hills, Michigan
|
|
48303 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | |
(Zip
Code) |
|
Registrant's telephone number, including area
code: (248) 646-2400
Indicate by check mark whether the
Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90
days. Yes X No .
Indicate by check mark whether the
Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes X No .
As of May 1, 2005, there were
outstanding 46,287,942 shares of Class A Limited Voting Common Stock, par value $0.10 per
share, and 17,884,718 shares of Class B Common Stock, par value $0.10 per share, of the
Registrant. Each share of Class B Common Stock is freely convertible into one share of
Class A Limited Voting Common Stock.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SOTHEBY'S
HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
(Thousands of dollars, except per share data)
Three
months Ended March 31
|
2005
|
2004
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction and related revenues |
|
|
$ |
72,175 |
|
$ |
58,853 |
|
License fee revenues |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
45,000 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
|
1,676 |
|
|
1,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
|
74,027 |
|
|
105,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
Direct costs of services |
|
|
|
10,229 |
|
|
7,120 |
|
Salaries and related costs |
|
|
|
39,519 |
|
|
38,960 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
27,184 |
|
|
25,657 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
|
5,646 |
|
|
5,895 |
|
Retention costs |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
285 |
|
Net restructuring charges |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
|
82,578 |
|
|
78,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income |
|
|
|
(8,551 |
) |
|
27,390 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
1,609 |
|
|
570 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
(8,142 |
) |
|
(8,410 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations before taxes |
|
|
|
(15,079 |
) |
|
20,189 |
|
Equity in earnings of investees, net of taxes |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
162 |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
|
(4,987 |
) |
|
6,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
|
|
(9,743 |
) |
|
13,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations (Note 3): |
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations before taxes |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
36,712 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
13,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
23,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
|
($ 9,721 |
) |
$ |
36,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
(Loss) earnings from continuing operations |
|
|
|
($ 0.16 |
) |
$ |
0.22 |
|
Earnings from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per share: |
|
|
|
($ 0.16 |
) |
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
(Loss) earnings from continuing operations |
|
|
|
($ 0.16 |
) |
$ |
0.22 |
|
Earnings from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share: |
|
|
|
($ 0.16 |
) |
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
|
62,594 |
|
|
61,589 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
62,594 |
|
|
62,065 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
3
SOTHEBY'S HOLDINGS,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Thousands of dollars)
|
March 31,
2005
(UNAUDITED)
|
December 31,
2004
|
March 31,
2004
(UNAUDITED)
|
A S S E T
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
Cash and
cash equivalents |
|
|
$ |
109,246 |
|
$ |
146,922 |
|
$ |
71,079 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
|
7,207 |
|
|
11,964 |
|
|
495 |
|
Short-term
investments |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
110,000 |
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of
allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
of $5,928, $6,172
and $5,388 |
|
|
|
141,759 |
|
|
410,904 |
|
|
120,495 |
|
Notes receivable
and consignor advances, net of allowance for credit losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of
$1,847, $1,759 and $1,499 |
|
|
|
58,879 |
|
|
56,716 |
|
|
60,177 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
|
34,447 |
|
|
34,126 |
|
|
17,550 |
|
Deferred
income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,117 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other
current assets |
|
|
|
45,901 |
|
|
61,077 |
|
|
51,446 |
|
Assets
held for sale (Note 3) |
|
|
|
1,660 |
|
|
588 |
|
|
1,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Current Assets |
|
|
|
439,099 |
|
|
832,297 |
|
|
327,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes receivable |
|
|
|
24,054 |
|
|
35,575 |
|
|
13,798 |
|
Properties,
net of accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of
$124,823, $122,283 and $90,295 |
|
|
|
233,124 |
|
|
238,523 |
|
|
244,050 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
13,639 |
|
|
13,753 |
|
|
13,528 |
|
Investments |
|
|
|
26,533 |
|
|
28,343 |
|
|
28,235 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
80,038 |
|
|
73,151 |
|
|
83,230 |
|
Other
assets |
|
|
|
3,546 |
|
|
3,704 |
|
|
3,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Assets |
|
|
$ |
820,033 |
|
$ |
1,225,346 |
|
$ |
713,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L I A B I L I T I E S A
N D S H A R E H O L D E R' S E Q U I T Y |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
Due to consignors |
|
|
$ |
135,499 |
|
$ |
470,946 |
|
$ |
89,045 |
|
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
|
67,795 |
|
|
112,416 |
|
|
64,071 |
|
Deferred revenues |
|
|
|
4,564 |
|
|
4,799 |
|
|
4,885 |
|
Accrued
income taxes |
|
|
|
4,086 |
|
|
10,153 |
|
|
4,224 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
6,184 |
|
|
5,462 |
|
|
|
|
York Property
capital lease obligation |
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
123 |
|
|
116 |
|
Deferred gain on sale of York
Property |
|
|
|
1,129 |
|
|
1,129 |
|
|
1,129 |
|
Settlement
liabilities |
|
|
|
17,817 |
|
|
14,454 |
|
|
12,718 |
|
Liabilities held for sale
(Note 3) |
|
|
|
1,554 |
|
|
455 |
|
|
1,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
239,052 |
|
|
619,937 |
|
|
177,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of unamortized
discount of $362, $383,and $441 |
|
|
|
99,638 |
|
|
99,617 |
|
|
99,559 |
|
Settlement
liabilities |
|
|
|
45,846 |
|
|
61,085 |
|
|
62,285 |
|
York Property capital lease
obligation |
|
|
|
171,715 |
|
|
172,046 |
|
|
172,139 |
|
Deferred
gain on sale of York Property |
|
|
|
19,092 |
|
|
19,374 |
|
|
20,220 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
|
17,912 |
|
|
17,368 |
|
|
17,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Liabilities |
|
|
|
593,255 |
|
|
989,427 |
|
|
549,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
(Note 10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders' Equity: |
|
|
Common
Stock, $0.10 par value |
|
|
|
6,413 |
|
|
6,374 |
|
|
6,280 |
|
Authorized shares125,000,000
of Class A and 75,000,000 of Class B, |
|
|
Issued
and outstanding shares46,273,447, 45,923,612 and 45,098,872 of Class
A, |
|
|
and
17,884,717, 17,850,808 and 17,705,593 of Class B at March 31, 2005, |
|
|
December
31, 2004 and March 31, 2004, respectively |
|
|
Additional
paid-in capital |
|
|
|
235,957 |
|
|
230,124 |
|
|
218,281 |
|
(Accumulated deficit) retained
earnings |
|
|
|
(1,582 |
) |
|
8,139 |
|
|
(41,822 |
) |
Deferred
compensation expense |
|
|
|
(12,715 |
) |
|
(10,341 |
) |
|
(14,453 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive
loss |
|
|
|
(1,295 |
) |
|
1,623 |
|
|
(3,929 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Shareholders' Equity |
|
|
|
226,778 |
|
|
235,919 |
|
|
164,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity |
|
|
$ |
820,033 |
|
$ |
1,225,346 |
|
$ |
713,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements
4
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
(Thousand of dollars)
Three
Months Ended March 31
|
2005
|
2004
|
Operating
Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)
income* |
|
|
|
($ 9,721 |
) |
$ |
36,720 |
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash used by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization expense |
|
|
|
5,646 |
|
|
5,895 |
|
Gain
on sale of discontinued operations (Note 3) |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
(33,061 |
) |
Equity
in earnings of investees |
|
|
|
(349 |
) |
|
(162 |
) |
Deferred
income tax (benefit) |
|
|
|
(5,106 |
) |
|
6,345 |
|
Tax
benefit of stock option exercises |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
15 |
|
Restricted
stock compensation expense |
|
|
|
2,462 |
|
|
218 |
|
Asset
provisions |
|
|
|
1,298 |
|
|
328 |
|
Amortization
of discount related to antitrust matters |
|
|
|
1,060 |
|
|
1,247 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
345 |
|
Changes in
assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease
in accounts receivable |
|
|
|
270,296 |
|
|
116,072 |
|
Decrease
in inventory |
|
|
|
508 |
|
|
1,049 |
|
Decrease
(increase) in prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
|
11,374 |
|
|
(4,582 |
) |
Decrease
(increase) in other long-term assets |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
(252 |
) |
Funding
of settlement liabilities |
|
|
|
(13,059 |
) |
|
(7,222 |
) |
Decrease
in due to consignors |
|
|
|
(335,945 |
) |
|
(169,179 |
) |
Decrease
in accrued income taxes and deferred income tax liabilities |
|
|
|
(7,296 |
) |
|
(2,633 |
) |
Decrease
in accounts payable and accrued liabilities and other liabilities |
|
|
|
(44,940 |
) |
|
(23,171 |
) |
Adjustments
related to discontinued operations (Note 3) |
|
|
|
1,007 |
|
|
6,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
cash used by operating activities |
|
|
|
(122,434 |
) |
|
(65,503 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Investing
Activities: |
|
|
Funding
of notes receivable and consignor advances |
|
|
|
(22,313 |
) |
|
(43,259 |
) |
Collections
of notes receivable and consignor advances |
|
|
|
29,954 |
|
|
74,843 |
|
Purchases
of short-term investments |
|
|
|
(115,475 |
) |
|
-- |
|
Proceeds
from maturities of short-term investments |
|
|
|
185,475 |
|
|
-- |
|
Capital
expenditures |
|
|
|
(2,483 |
) |
|
(3,245 |
) |
Proceeds
from sale of discontinued operations (Note 3) |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
53,863 |
|
Distributions
from equity investees |
|
|
|
2,348 |
|
|
647 |
|
Decrease
in restricted cash |
|
|
|
5,055 |
|
|
7,129 |
|
Adjustments
related to discontinued operations (Note 3) |
|
|
|
(1,012 |
) |
|
625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
|
81,549 |
|
|
90,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing
Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from credit facility borrowings |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
65,000 |
|
Repayments
of credit facility borrowings |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
(85,000 |
) |
Decrease
in York Property capital lease obligation |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
(27 |
) |
Proceeds
from exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
2,625 |
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
cash provided (used) by financing activities |
|
|
|
2,595 |
|
|
(19,479 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of
consolidating variable interest entity |
|
|
|
735 |
|
|
327 |
|
Effect of
exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
(153 |
) |
|
(110 |
) |
(Decrease)
increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
(37,708 |
) |
|
5,838 |
|
Cash and
cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
|
147,023 |
|
|
65,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and
cash equivalents at end of period |
|
|
$ |
109,315 |
|
$ |
71,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period: |
|
|
Continuing
operations |
|
|
$ |
109,246 |
|
$ |
71,079 |
|
Discontinued
Operations |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
109,315 |
|
$ |
71,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Net
income from discontinued operations (Note 3) |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
$ |
23,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
5
SOTHEBYS
HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
|
The
Consolidated Financial Statements included herein have been prepared by Sothebys
Holdings, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, the Company) pursuant to the
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC).
These Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the
Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto included in the Companys
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
|
|
Prior
to the first quarter of 2005, expenses related to the investigation by the Antitrust
Division of the United States Department of Justice (the DOJ), other
governmental investigations and the related civil litigation were classified as Special
Charges in the Consolidated Income Statements. Beginning in the first quarter of 2005,
such expenses, consisting principally of settlement administration costs and legal fees,
are classified within General and Administrative Expenses for all periods presented as
they are no longer significant to the Companys results. For the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004, the amounts previously presented as Special Charges were $0.2
million and $0.5 million, respectively.
|
|
Prior
to the fourth quarter of 2004, the Companys share of earnings from equity method
investments was presented on a pre-tax basis within Auction and Related Revenues in the
Consolidated Income Statements. Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2004, such amounts
were presented net of taxes in the Consolidated Income Statements as a separate line
below Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations Before Taxes. Prior year amounts in the
Consolidated Income Statements and in Note 4 below have been adjusted to conform to the
current period presentation.
|
|
In
the third and fourth quarters of 2004, the components of the Companys real estate
brokerage business outside the United States (the U.S.) were classified as
discontinued operations in the Consolidated Income Statements and the related assets and
liabilities were classified as held for sale in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Prior
year amounts in the Consolidated Income Statements and Consolidated Balance Sheets have
been adjusted to conform to the current period presentation. (See Note 3 for more
detailed information related to Discontinued Operations.)
|
|
In
the opinion of the management of the Company, all adjustments, consisting of normal
recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial statements
included herein have been made.
|
2. |
|
Seasonality
of Business |
|
The
worldwide art auction market has two principal selling seasons, spring and fall.
Consequently, first and third quarter results of the Auction segment typically reflect
lower Aggregate Auction Sales (as defined below) when compared to the second and fourth
quarters and, accordingly, a net loss due to the fixed nature of many of the Companys
operating expenses. Aggregate Auction Sales represents the hammer price of
property sold at auction by the Company plus buyers premium.
|
6
|
The
table below demonstrates that approximately 80% of the Companys Aggregate Auction
Sales occur during the second and fourth quarters of the year.
|
|
Percentage of Annual
Aggregate Auction Sales
|
|
2004
|
2003
|
2002
|
January - March |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
12 |
% |
|
11 |
% |
April - June | | |
| 41 |
% |
| 34 |
% |
| 38 |
% |
July - September | | |
| 7 |
% |
| 7 |
% |
| 12 |
% |
October - December | | |
| 43 |
% |
| 47 |
% |
| 39 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| 100 |
% |
| 100 |
% |
| 100 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
3. |
|
Discontinued
Operations |
|
In
the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company committed to a plan to sell its
domestic real estate brokerage business, Sothebys International Realty,
Inc. (SIR), as well as most of its real estate brokerage offices
outside of the U.S.. On February 17, 2004, the Company consummated the sale
of SIR to a subsidiary of Cendant Corporation (Cendant). In
conjunction with the sale, the Company entered into an agreement with Cendant
to license the Sothebys International Realty trademark and certain
related trademarks for an initial 50-year term with a 50-year renewal option
(the License Agreement). The License Agreement is applicable
worldwide except in Australia. |
|
The
total consideration paid by Cendant at closing for SIRs company-owned real estate
brokerage business and affiliate network, as well as the License Agreement was $100.7
million, consisting of $98.9 million in cash and the assumption of a $1.8 million note
payable. Net cash proceeds from the sale, after deducting $4.9 million in transaction
costs, were $94 million. In addition to the consideration received at closing, the
License Agreement provides for an ongoing license fee during its term based on the volume
of commerce transacted under the licensed trademarks.
|
|
The
consideration received at closing was allocated among each of the following components
based on a valuation of their respective fair values: (i) SIRs company-owned real
estate brokerage business and affiliate network, (ii) the License Agreement and (iii)
options to acquire certain international operations, which have since been exercised (the
International Options). Based on this valuation, $55.1 million was allocated
to SIRs company-owned real estate brokerage business and affiliate network, $45
million was allocated to the License Agreement and $0.6 million was allocated to the
International Options.
|
|
As
a result of the sale of the real estate brokerage business and affiliate
network to Cendant, the Company recognized a pre-tax gain of $33.1 million
in the first quarter of 2004, which is recorded within income from discontinued
operations before taxes in the Consolidated Income Statements. As a result
of this gain, the Company utilized approximately $12.7 million of the net
Deferred Tax Asset related to its net operating loss carryforwards in the
first quarter of 2004. |
|
The
$45 million of proceeds allocated to the License Agreement represents a
one-time non-refundable upfront license fee received by the Company as consideration
for entering into the License Agreement. The Company has no significant
future performance obligations associated with the non-refundable upfront
license fee. As a result, the Company recognized license fee revenue of
$45 million in the first quarter of 2004, which is classified within the
continuing operations section of the Consolidated Income Statements. This
classification is consistent with how the Company will report ongoing license
fees earned during the term of the License Agreement, as well as license
fee revenue earned in the future from other potential licensing opportunities.
As a result of this one-time license fee, the Company utilized approximately
$15 million of the net Deferred Tax Asset related to its net operating loss
carryforwards during the first quarter of 2004. The Company incurred transaction
costs of approximately $2.2 million related to the consummation of
|
7
|
the License Agreement, of which $2 million were incurred
in the first quarter of 2004, and were recorded within General and Administrative
Expenses in the Consolidated Income Statements.
|
|
In
the fourth quarter of 2004, the Company committed to a plan to sell its real estate
brokerage business in Australia. This business is the only remaining component of the
Companys former Real Estate segment. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities of the
Australia real estate brokerage business are classified as held for sale in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets, and its operating results are reported as discontinued
operations in the Consolidated Income Statements. The Australia real estate brokerage
business is not material to the Companys results of operations, financial condition
or liquidity.
|
|
The
following is a summary of the operating results of the Companys discontinued
operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004:
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31,
|
|
2005
|
2004
|
|
(Thousands of dollars) |
Revenues |
|
|
$ | 400 |
|
$ | 10,869 |
|
Expenses: | | |
Direct costs of services | | |
| 31 |
|
| 709 |
|
Salaries and related costs | | |
| 45 |
|
| 4,626 |
|
General and administrative expenses | | |
| 281 |
|
| 1,856 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense | | |
| |
|
| 13 |
|
|
| |
| |
Total expenses | | |
| 357 |
|
| 7,204 |
|
|
| |
| |
Operating income | | |
| 43 |
|
| 3,665 |
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations | | |
| |
|
| 33,061 |
|
Other income (expense) | | |
| 1 |
|
| (14 |
) |
|
| |
| |
Income from discontinued operations before taxes | | |
| 44 |
|
| 36,712 |
|
Income tax expense | | |
| 22 |
|
| 13,480 |
|
|
| |
| |
Income from discontinued operations | | |
$ | 22 |
|
$ | 23,232 |
|
|
| |
| |
|
According
to the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement related to the sale of SIR, the Company is
due to receive amounts collected by Cendant for the closing of real estate transactions
subsequent to February 17, 2004 that were under contract prior to that date. For the
three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, revenues from discontinued operations
included $0.3 million and $4.4 million respectively, of such amounts.
|
8
|
The
following is a summary of the assets and liabilities related to the Companys
discontinued operations which were classified as held for sale as of March 31, 2005,
December 31, 2004 and March 31, 2004:
|
|
March 31,
2005
|
December 31,
2004
|
March 31,
2004
|
|
(Thousands of dollars) |
Assets: |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Cash and cash equivalents | | |
$ | 69 |
|
$ | 101 |
|
$ | 162 |
|
Restricted cash | | |
| 1,448 |
|
| 437 |
|
| 397 |
|
Accounts receivable, net | | |
| 104 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 305 |
|
Properties, net | | |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 25 |
|
Other current assets | | |
| 30 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 171 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
Assets held for sale | | |
$ | 1,660 |
|
$ | 588 |
|
$ | 1,060 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
Liabilities: | | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | |
$ | 1,554 |
|
$ | 455 |
|
$ | 1,024 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
Liabilities held for sale | | |
$ | 1,554 |
|
$ | 455 |
|
$ | 1,024 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
|
The
Companys continuing operations are organized under two business segments Auction
and Finance. The Companys discontinued real estate brokerage business, which
comprised its former Real Estate segment, is not included in this presentation. (See Note
3 for further information on discontinued operations.)
|
|
Prior
to the fourth quarter of 2004, the Companys share of earnings from equity method
investments was presented on a pre-tax basis within Auction and Related Revenues in the
Consolidated Income Statements. Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2004, such amounts
were presented net of taxes in the Consolidated Income Statements as a separate line
below Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations before Taxes. Prior year amounts in the
presentation below have been adjusted to conform to current period presentation.
|
|
The
table below presents revenues for the Companys operating segments, as well as a
reconciliation of segment revenues to total revenues from continuing operations for the
three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004:
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31,
|
|
2005
|
2004
|
|
(Thousands of dollars) |
|
Auction |
|
|
$ | 72,175 |
|
$ | 58,853 |
|
Finance | | |
| 1,208 |
|
| 1,216 |
|
All Other | | |
| 468 |
|
| 357 |
|
|
| |
| |
Total segment revenues | | |
| 73,851 |
|
| 60,426 |
|
Unallocated amounts: | | |
License fee revenue (see Note 3) | | |
| 176 |
|
| 45,000 |
|
|
| |
| |
Total revenues from continuing operations | | |
$ | 74,027 |
|
$ | 105,426 |
|
|
| |
| |
9
|
The
table below presents loss before taxes for the Companys operating segments, as well
as a reconciliation of segment loss before taxes to (loss) income from continuing
operations before taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004:
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
2005
|
2004
|
|
(Thousands of dollars) |
|
Auction |
|
|
| ($12,662 |
) |
| ($19,966 |
) |
Finance | | |
| (622 |
) |
| (269 |
) |
All Other | | |
| (125 |
) |
| (118 |
) |
|
| |
| |
Segment loss before taxes | | |
| (13,409 |
) |
| (20,353 |
) |
Unallocated amounts: | | |
Antitrust related expenses (see Note 1) | | |
| (249 |
) |
| (512 |
) |
License fee revenues (see Note 3) | | |
| 176 |
|
| 45,000 |
|
License Agreement transaction costs (see Note 3)* | | |
| |
|
| (2,046 |
) |
Amortization of discount - DOJ antitrust fine | | |
| (364 |
) |
| (532 |
) |
(see Note 12) | | |
Amortization of discount - Discount Certificates | | |
| (696 |
) |
| (715 |
) |
(see Note 12) | | |
Equity in earnings of investees** | | |
| (537 |
) |
| (249 |
) |
Retention costs | | |
| |
|
| (285 |
) |
Net restructuring charges | | |
| |
|
| (119 |
) |
|
| |
| |
(Loss) income from continuing operations before taxes | | |
$ | (15,079 |
) |
$ | 20,189 |
|
|
| |
| |
|
* |
|
Represents
transaction costs related to the consummation of the License Agreement, which are not
allocated to the Companys operating segments. This is consistent with how the
related license fee revenue is presented for segment reporting purposes. |
|
** |
|
Represents
the Companys pre-tax share of earnings related to its equity investees. Such
amounts are included in the table above in loss before taxes for the Auction segment, but
are presented net of taxes below (loss) income from continuing operations before taxes in
the Consolidated Income Statements. |
10
|
The
table below presents assets for the Companys operating segments, as well as a
reconciliation of segment assets to consolidated assets as of March 31, 2005, December
31, 2004 and March 31, 2004:
|
|
March 31,
2005
|
December 31,
2004
|
March 31,
2004
|
|
(Thousands
of dollars) |
|
|
|
|
Auction |
|
|
$ |
659,896 |
|
$ |
1,064,091 |
|
$ |
553,785 |
|
Finance |
|
|
|
78,172 |
|
|
86,601 |
|
|
69,259 |
|
All Other |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
915 |
|
|
1,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
segment assets |
|
|
|
738,335 |
|
|
1,151,607 |
|
|
624,151 |
|
Unallocated
amounts: |
|
|
Deferred
tax assets |
|
|
|
80,038 |
|
|
73,151 |
|
|
88,347 |
|
Assets
held for sale (see Note 3) |
|
|
|
1,660 |
|
|
588 |
|
|
1,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Assets |
|
|
$ |
820,033 |
|
$ |
1,225,346 |
|
$ |
713,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. |
|
Notes
Receivable and Consignor Advances |
|
The
Companys Finance segment provides certain collectors and dealers with financing
generally secured by works of art that the Company either has in its possession or
permits the borrower to possess. The Companys general policy is to make secured
loans at loan to value ratios (principal loan amount divided by the low auction estimate
of the collateral) of 50% or lower. The Company will also lend at loan to value ratios
higher than 50%. All of the Companys loans are variable interest rate loans.
|
|
The
Company generally makes two types of secured loans: (1) advances secured by consigned
property to borrowers who are contractually committed, in the near term, to sell the
property at auction (a consignor advance); and (2) general purpose term loans
to collectors or dealers secured by property not presently intended for sale (a term
loan). The consignor advance allows a consignor to receive funds shortly after
consignment for an auction that will occur several weeks or months in the future, while
preserving for the benefit of the consignor the potential of the auction process. Term
loans allow the Company to establish or enhance mutually beneficial relationships with
dealers and collectors. Term loans are generally made with full recourse against the
borrower. In certain instances, however, term loans are made with recourse limited to the
works of art pledged as security for the loan. To the extent that the Company is looking
wholly or partially to the collateral for repayment of its loans, repayment can be
adversely impacted by a decline in the art market in general or in the value of the
particular collateral. In addition, in situations where the borrower becomes subject to
bankruptcy or insolvency laws, the Companys ability to realize on its collateral
may be limited or delayed by the application of such laws. Under certain circumstances,
the Company also makes unsecured loans to collectors and dealers. Included in gross Notes
Receivable and Consignor Advances are unsecured loans totaling $5.7 million, $6.0 million
and $5.3 million at March 31, 2005, December 31, 2004 and March 31, 2004, respectively.
|
|
In
certain situations, the Company also finances the purchase of works of art by certain art
dealers through unsecured loans. The property purchased pursuant to such unsecured loans
is sold by the dealer or at auction with any profit or loss shared by the Company and the
dealer. Interest income related to such unsecured loans is reflected in the results of
the Finance segment, while the Companys share of any profit or loss is reflected in
the results of the Auction segment. The total of all such unsecured loans was $5.0
million, $5.4 million and $4.4 million at March 31, 2005, December 31, 2004 and March 31,
2004,
|
11
|
respectively. These amounts are included in the total unsecured loan balances
provided in the previous paragraph.
|
|
At
March 31, 2005, one note receivable comprised approximately 12% of the net Notes
Receivable and Consignor Advances balance. The Company expects this loan to be repaid in
January 2006.
|
|
The
weighted average interest rates charged on Notes Receivable and Consignor Advances were
5.9% and 4.7% for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
|
|
Changes
in the Allowance for Credit Losses relating to Notes Receivable and Consignor Advances
for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 were as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31,
|
|
2005
|
2004
|
|
(Thousands of dollars) |
Allowance for credit losses at January 1 |
|
|
$ | 1,759 |
|
$ | 1,600 |
|
Change in loan loss provision | | |
| 100 |
|
| |
|
Write-offs | | |
| |
|
| (103 |
) |
Foreign currency exchange rate changes | | |
| (12 |
) |
| 2 |
|
|
| |
| |
Allowance for credit losses at March 31 | | |
$ | 1,847 |
|
$ | 1,499 |
|
|
| |
| |
|
Goodwill
is entirely attributable to the Auction segment. For the three months ended March 31,
2005 and 2004, changes in the carrying value of Goodwill were as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31,
|
|
2005
|
2004
|
|
(Thousands of dollars) |
Balance as of January 1 |
|
|
$ | 13,753 |
|
$ | 13,565 |
|
Foreign currency exchange rate changes | | |
| (114 |
) |
| (37 |
) |
|
| |
| |
Balance as of March 31 | | |
$ | 13,639 |
|
$ | 13,528 |
|
|
| |
| |
|
Bank
Credit Facilities On March 4, 2004, the Company entered into a senior secured
credit agreement with General Electric Capital Corporation (the GE Capital Credit
Agreement). The GE Capital Credit Agreement is available through March 4, 2007 and
provides for borrowings of up to $200 million provided by an international syndicate of
lenders. The Companys obligations under the GE Capital Credit Agreement are secured
by substantially all of the assets of the Company, as well as the assets of its
subsidiaries in the U.S. and the United Kingdom (the U.K.).
|
|
The
GE Capital Credit Agreement contains financial covenants requiring the Company to not
exceed $15 million in annual capital expenditures, to not make dividend payments and to
have a quarterly fixed charge coverage ratio of not less than 1.0. The GE Capital Credit
Agreement also has certain non-financial covenants and restrictions. The Company is in
compliance with its covenants.
|
|
At
the option of the Company, borrowings under the GE Capital Credit Agreement generally
bear interest equal to: (i) 1.25% plus the higher of the Prime Rate or the Federal Funds
Rate plus 0.5%, or (ii)
|
12
|
LIBOR plus 2.5%. Pursuant to the GE Capital Credit Agreement, on
a quarterly basis, the applicable interest rate charged for borrowings is adjusted up or
down depending on the Companys performance under the quarterly fixed charge
coverage ratio tests.
|
|
For
the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company had no outstanding
borrowings under the GE Capital Credit Agreement. For the three months ended
March 31, 2004, the weighted average interest rate charged on outstanding
short-term borrowings under the Companys previous senior secured credit
facility, which were fully repaid on March 4, 2004, was approximately 6.2%.
|
|
Senior
Unsecured DebtIn February 1999, the Company issued a tranche of long-term debt
securities (the Notes), pursuant to the Companys $200 million shelf
registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission, for an aggregate offering price
of $100 million. The ten-year Notes have an effective interest rate of 6.98% payable
semi-annually in February and August.
|
|
The
Notes have covenants that impose limitations on the Company from placing liens on certain
property and entering into certain sale-leaseback transactions. The Company is in
compliance with these covenants.
|
|
Interest
ExpenseFor the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, interest expense related
to the Companys continuing operations was $8.1 million and $8.4 million,
respectively, and consisted of the following:
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31,
|
|
2005
|
2004
|
|
(Thousands of dollars) |
Credit Facility Borrowings: |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Interest expense on outstanding borrowings | | |
$ | |
|
$ | 298 |
|
Amortization of amendment and arrangement fees | | |
| 250 |
|
| 240 |
|
Commitment fees | | |
| 250 |
|
| 101 |
|
|
| |
| |
Sub-total | | |
| 500 |
|
| 639 |
|
|
| |
| |
Interest expense on York Property capital lease obligation | | |
| 4,476 |
|
| 4,479 |
|
Interest expense on long-term debt | | |
| 1,739 |
|
| 1,738 |
|
Amortization
of discount - DOJ antitrust fine (see Note 12) |
| |
| 364 |
|
| 532 |
|
Amortization
of discount - Discount Certificates (see Note 12) |
| |
| 696 |
|
| 715 |
|
Other interest expense | | |
| 367 |
|
| 307 |
|
|
| |
| |
Total | | |
$ | 8,142 |
|
$ | 8,410 |
|
|
| |
| |
|
Other
interest expense principally relates to interest accrued on the obligations under the
Sothebys, Inc. Benefits Equalization Plan and its successor, the Sothebys,
Inc. 2005 Benefit Equalization Plan, which are unfunded defined contribution plans
available to certain U.S. officers of the Company whose contributions to the Sothebys,
Inc. Retirement Savings Plan are limited by Internal Revenue Service regulations.
|
8. |
|
Defined
Benefit Pension Plan |
|
The
Company makes contributions to a defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all
U.K. employees (the U.K. Plan). Effective April 1, 2004, the U.K. Plan was
closed to new employees. From that date, a defined contribution plan was made available
to new employees in the U.K.
|
13
|
For
the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, the components of net periodic pension
cost were:
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31,
|
|
2005
|
2004
|
|
(Thousands of dollars) |
Service cost |
|
|
$ | 1,629 |
|
$ | 1,672 |
|
Interest cost | | |
| 3,252 |
|
| 2,802 |
|
Expected return on plan assets | | |
| (4,158 |
) |
| (4,128 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost | | |
| 69 |
|
| 67 |
|
Amortization of actuarial loss | | |
| 541 |
|
| 263 |
|
|
| |
| |
Sub-total | | |
| 1,333 |
|
| 676 |
|
Special termination benefits | | |
| |
|
| 13 |
* |
|
| |
| |
Net periodic pension cost | | |
$ | 1,333 |
|
$ | 689 |
|
|
| |
| |
|
* |
|
Special
termination benefits are reflected in the Consolidated Income Statements within Net
Restructuring Charges. |
|
The
Company expects to contribute approximately $18 million to the U.K. Plan in 2005,
including a $15 million discretionary contribution expected to be made in the second
quarter of 2005.
|
9. |
|
Derivative
Instruments |
|
The
Company utilizes forward exchange contracts to manage exposures related to foreign
currency risks, which primarily arise from short-term foreign currency denominated
intercompany balances. Generally, such intercompany balances are centrally managed by the
Companys global treasury function. The Companys objective for holding
derivative instruments is to minimize foreign currency risks using the most effective
methods to eliminate or reduce the impacts of these exposures.
|
|
The
forward exchange contracts entered into by the Company are used as economic cash flow
hedges of the Companys exposure to short-term foreign currency denominated
intercompany balances. Such forward exchange contracts are typically short-term with
settlement dates no more than one month from their inception. These contracts are not
designated as hedging instruments under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as
amended, and are recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value, which is
based on referenced market rates. Changes in the fair value of the Companys forward
exchange contracts are recognized currently in earnings and are generally offset by the
revaluation of the underlying intercompany balances in accordance with SFAS No. 52, Foreign
Currency Translation.
|
|
As
of March 31, 2005 and 2004, the Consolidated Balance Sheets included liabilities of $0.5
million and $0.7 million, respectively, recorded within Accounts Payable and Accrued
Liabilities reflecting the fair value of the Companys outstanding forward exchange
contracts on those dates. As of December 31, 2004, the Consolidated Balance Sheets
included assets of approximately $30,000 recorded within Prepaid Expenses and Other
Current Assets reflecting the fair value of the Companys outstanding forward
exchange contracts on that date.
|
14
10. |
|
Commitments
and Contingencies |
|
Employment AgreementsDuring the second half of 2003 the Company entered into employment
agreements with a number of employees, which expire in June 2006. Such agreements
provide, among other benefits, for minimum salary levels, as well as incentive bonuses
which are payable only if specified Company and individual goals are attained. The
aggregate commitment for future salaries related to these employment agreements for the
entire three-year period, excluding incentive bonuses, is approximately $10.4 million, of
which approximately $6.2 million had been paid through May 1, 2005.
|
|
Lending
CommitmentsIn certain situations, the Companys Finance segment enters into
legally binding arrangements to lend, primarily on a collateralized basis and subject to
certain limitations and conditions, to potential consignors and other individuals who
have collections of fine art or other objects. Unfunded commitments to extend additional
credit were approximately $8.9 million at March 31, 2005.
|
|
Legal ActionsThe Canadian Competition Bureau is continuing
to conduct an investigation regarding anti-competitive practices relating
to commissions charged by the Company and Christies International,
PLC (Christies) for auction services during the period
1993 to 2000. |
|
The
Company also becomes involved, from time to time, in various claims and lawsuits
incidental to the ordinary course of its business.
|
|
Management does not believe that the outcome of any of the pending claims or proceedings described
above will have a material adverse effect on the Companys business, results of
operations, financial condition and/or liquidity.
|
|
Gain ContingencyDuring the third quarter of 2004, the Company
signed an agreement for the sale of land and buildings at Billingshurst,
West Sussex in the U.K. (the Sussex Property). The completion
of the sale is conditional upon the receipt of planning permission for redevelopment
of part of the site. If completed, the sale of the Sussex Property would
result in a pre-tax gain in the range of approximately $5 to $6 million.
The Company expects this contingency to be resolved some time in 2005 or
2006. |
|
(See
Note 11 for other commitments and contingencies.)
|
|
From
time to time in the ordinary course of business, the Company will guarantee to consignors
a minimum price in connection with the sale of property at auction. The Company must
perform under its auction guarantee only in the event that the property sells for less
than the minimum price and, therefore, the Company must pay the difference between the
sale price at auction and the amount of the auction guarantee. If the property does not
sell, the amount of the auction guarantee must be paid, but the Company has the right to
recover such amount through future sale of the property. Generally, the Company is
entitled to a share of the excess proceeds if the property under the auction guarantee
sells above a minimum price. In addition, the Company is obligated under the terms of
certain guarantees to advance a portion of the guaranteed amount prior to the auction. In
certain situations, the Company reduces its financial exposure under auction guarantees
through sharing arrangements with unaffiliated third parties.
|
|
As
of March 31, 2005, the Company had outstanding auction guarantees totaling $54.5 million,
the property relating to which had a mid-estimate sales price (1) of $64.1 million. The
Companys financial exposure under these auction guarantees is reduced by $6.3
million as a result of sharing arrangements with unaffiliated third parties. The property
related to such auction guarantees is being offered at auctions throughout 2005. As of
March 31, 2005, $14.1 million of the guaranteed amount had been advanced by the Company
and its partners, of which $13 million is recorded within Notes Receivable and Consignor
Advances in the Consolidated Balance Sheets (see Note 5). As of March 31, 2005, December
31, 2004 and March 31, 2004, the carrying amount of the liability related to the Companys
auction guarantees was approximately $0.5 million, $0.1 million and $0.7 million,
respectively, and was reflected in the
|
15
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets within Accounts
Payable and Accrued Liabilities.
|
|
As
of May 6, 2005, the Company had outstanding auction guarantees totaling
$112.3 million, the property relating to which had a mid-estimate sales
price (1) of $125.3 million. The Companys financial exposure under
these auction guarantees is reduced by $11.3 million as a result of sharing
arrangements with unaffiliated third parties. The property related to such
auction guarantees will be offered at auctions throughout 2005. As of May
6, 2005, $8.4 million of the guaranteed amount had been advanced by the
Company and its partners, of which the Company will record its $7.2 million
share within Notes Receivable and Consignor Advances. |
(1) |
|
The
mid-estimate sales price is calculated as the average of the low and high
pre-sale auction estimates for the property under the auction guarantee.
Pre-sale estimates are not always accurate predictions of auction sale results. |
12. |
|
Settlement Liabilities |
|
In
February 2001, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York imposed on
the Company a fine of $45 million payable to the DOJ without interest over a period of
five years. As a result, in the third quarter of 2000, the Company recorded Settlement
Liabilities of $34.1 representing the present value of the fine payable. The $10.9
million discount on the amount due is being amortized to interest expense over the
five-year period during which the fine is being paid. As of March 31, 2005, the carrying
value of the fine payable to the DOJ was $14 million. The final payment of $15 million
owed under the fine is due on February 6, 2006.
|
|
Additionally,
in conjunction with the settlement of certain civil litigation related to the
investigation by the DOJ, the Company issued to the class of plaintiffs vendors
commission discount certificates (Discount Certificates) with a face value of
$62.5 million. The Discount Certificates are fully redeemable in connection with any
auction conducted by the Company or Christies in the U.S. or in the U.K. and may be
used to satisfy consignment charges involving vendors commission, risk of loss
and/or catalogue illustration. The court determined that the $62.5 million face
value of the Discount Certificates had a fair market value of not less than $50 million,
which represents the amount recorded as Settlement Liabilities in the third quarter of
2000. The Discount Certificates will expire on May 14, 2008 and cannot be redeemed
subsequent to that date; however, any unused Discount Certificates may be redeemed for
cash at their face value at any time between May 15, 2007 and May 14, 2008. The
$12.5 million discount on the face value of the Discount Certificates is being
amortized to interest expense over the four-year period prior to May 15, 2007, the
first date at which the Discount Certificates are redeemable for cash. As of March 31,
2005, the outstanding face value of unused Discount Certificates that the Company could
be required to redeem was $55.9 million and the carrying value of such Discount
Certificates was $49.6 million.
|
|
As
of March 31, 2005, December 31, 2004 and March 31, 2004, Settlement Liabilities consisted
of the following:
|
16
|
March 31,
2005
|
December 31,
2004
|
March 31,
2004
|
|
(Thousands of dollars) |
|
Current: |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Discount Certificates (net) | | |
$ | 3,800 |
* |
$ | 3,700 |
|
$ | 2,600 |
|
DOJ antitrust fine (net) | | |
| 14,017 |
|
| 10,754 |
|
| 10,118 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
Sub-total | | |
| 17,817 |
|
| 14,454 |
|
| 12,718 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
Long-term: | | |
Discount Certificates (net) | | |
| 45,846 |
|
| 46,186 |
|
| 48,267 |
|
DOJ antitrust fine (net) | | |
| |
|
| 14,899 |
|
| 14,018 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
Sub-total | | |
| 45,846 |
|
| 61,085 |
|
| 62,285 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
Total | | |
$ | 63,663 |
|
$ | 75,539 |
|
$ | 75,003 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
|
* |
|
The
current portion of the liability for the Discount Certificates is based on managements
estimate of redemptions expected during the twelve-month period after the current balance
sheet date. |
|
During
the three months ended March 31, 2005, amounts charged to and cash payments made against
Settlement Liabilities were:
|
|
Discount
Certificates
(net)
|
DOJ
Antitrust
Fine
(net)
|
Total
|
|
(Thousands of dollars) |
Settlement Liabilities as of January 1, 2005 |
|
|
$ | 49,886 |
|
$ | 25,653 |
|
$ | 75,539 |
|
Cash payment to DOJ | | |
| |
|
| (12,000 |
) |
| (12,000 |
) |
Redemption of Discount Certificates | | |
| (1,059 |
) |
| |
|
| (1,059 |
) |
Amortization of discount | | |
| 696 |
|
| 364 |
|
| 1,060 |
|
Loss on redemption of Discount Certificates | | |
| 123 |
|
| |
|
| 123 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
Settlement Liabilities as of March 31, 2005 | | |
$ | 49,646 |
|
$ | 14,017 |
|
$ | 63,663 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
13. |
|
Comprehensive (Loss) Income |
|
The
Companys comprehensive (loss) income includes the net (loss) income for the period,
as well as other comprehensive loss, which consists of the change in the foreign currency
translation adjustment account during the period. For the three months ended March 31,
2005 and 2004, comprehensive (loss) income is as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31,
|
|
2005
|
2004
|
|
(Thousands of dollars) |
Net (loss) income |
|
|
| ($ 9,721 |
) |
$ | 36,720 |
|
Other comprehensive loss | | |
| (2,918 |
) |
| (644 |
) |
|
| |
| |
Comprehensive (loss) income | | |
| ($12,639 |
) |
$ | 36,076 |
|
|
| |
| |
14. |
|
Stock-Based Compensation |
|
Stock Option PlansAs currently permitted under SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, the Company has elected to measure stock-based
compensation related to its employee stock option plans using the intrinsic value
approach under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
|
17
|
Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees. When the intrinsic value approach is used, SFAS No. 123
requires supplemental disclosure to show the effects of using this approach on net income
(loss) and earnings (loss) per share.
|
|
Compensation
expense related to restricted stock shares issued pursuant to the Sothebys
Holdings, Inc. 2003 Restricted Stock Plan (the Restricted Stock Plan) is
determined based on the fair value of the shares issued on the date of grant. Such
compensation expense is subsequently amortized to Salaries and Related Costs over the
corresponding graded vesting period.
|
|
The
following table illustrates the effect on net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share
if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to all
of its employee stock compensation plans:
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31,
|
|
2005
|
2004
|
|
(Thousands of dollars, except per share data) |
Net (loss) income, as reported |
|
|
| ($ 9,721 |
) |
|
$36,720 |
|
Add: Stock-based employee compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expense included in reported net (loss) income, | | |
net of tax effects |
|
|
|
1,648 |
|
|
144 |
|
Deduct: Total stock-based employee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
compensation expense determined under fair | | |
value based method for all awards, net of related | | |
tax effects |
|
|
|
(2,019 |
) |
|
(1,148 |
) |
|
| |
| |
Pro forma net (loss) income |
|
|
|
($10,092 |
) |
|
$35,716 |
|
|
| |
| |
(Loss) earnings per share: | | |
Basic (loss) earnings per share, as reported |
|
|
|
($0.16 |
) |
|
$0.60 |
|
|
| |
| |
Basic (loss) earnings per share, pro forma |
|
|
|
($0.16 |
) |
|
$0.58 |
|
|
| |
| |
Diluted (loss) earnings per share, as reported |
|
|
|
($0.16 |
) |
|
$0.59 |
|
|
| |
| |
Diluted (loss) earnings per share, pro-forma |
|
|
|
($0.16 |
) |
|
$0.58 |
|
|
| |
| |
|
In
December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No.
123(R), Share-Based Payment. SFAS No. 123(R) requires the recognition
of compensation expense equal to the fair value of stock options or other
share-based payments. Under SFAS No. 123(R), the Company would have been
required to implement the standard as of July 1, 2005. In April 2005, the
SEC announced the adoption of a new rule that amended the compliance date
for SFAS No. 123(R). The SECs new rule will allow the Company to implement
SFAS No. 123(R) as of January 1, 2006. The Company will adopt SFAS No. 123(R)
using the modified prospective method, which will result in the amortization
of stock compensation expense related to unvested stock options outstanding
on the date of adoption, as well as any stock options granted subsequent
to that date. The Company expects the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) to result
in the recording of compensation expense in the range of $0.5 million to
$1.0 million in 2006 related to unvested stock options outstanding on the
date of adoption. |
|
Restricted
Stock PlanIn February 2003, the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors approved an exchange offer of cash or restricted stock for certain stock
options held by eligible employees under the Sothebys Holdings, Inc. 1997 Stock
Option Plan (the Exchange Offer). The Exchange Offer was tendered during the
first half of 2004. As a result of the Exchange Offer, approximately 5.6 million
|
18
|
stock options were cancelled and 1.1 million shares of restricted stock were issued. The
restricted stock shares were issued upon acceptance of the Exchange Offer at the closing
market price of the Companys Class A Common Stock on that date and resulted in the
recording of Deferred Compensation Expense and Additional Paid-in Capital of
approximately $14 million. The amount recorded as Deferred Compensation Expense is being
amortized to Salaries and Related Costs over the vesting period described above. For the
three months ended March 31, 2005, the Company recognized stock compensation expense of
$1.7 million related to the Exchange Offer. The cash payment made in conjunction with the
Exchange Offer was approximately $2.2 million and was expensed in full upon acceptance on
March 31, 2004.
|
|
In
February 2005, the Compensation Committee approved the issuance of 276,000 shares of
restricted stock with a fair value of $4.9 million. These restricted stock shares vest
ratably after each of the first, second, third and fourth years following the date of
grant.
|
15. |
|
Variable Interest Entity |
|
In
December 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) issued a
revision to FIN No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,which
was originally issued in January 2003. FIN No. 46, as revised, provides guidance on
the consolidation of certain entities when control exists through other than voting (or
similar) interests and was effective immediately with respect to entities created after
January 31, 2003. For certain special purpose entities created prior to February 1,
2003, FIN No. 46, as revised, became effective for financial statements issued after
December 15, 2003. FIN No. 46, as revised, was effective for all other entities
created prior to February 1, 2003 beginning with financial statements for reporting
periods ending after March 15, 2004. FIN No. 46, as revised, requires
consolidation by the majority holder of expected losses, expected residual returns, or
both of the activities of a variable interest entity (VIE).
|
|
The
Company has concluded that an entity with whom its Finance segment has outstanding loans
of approximately $3.7 million and to whom the Company provides management consulting
services meets the definition of a VIE under FIN No. 46, as revised. As primary
beneficiary of the VIE, the Company was required to consolidate the entity as part of the
Auction segment beginning on March 31, 2004.
|
|
The
entity is an art gallery which is engaged in business as a broker/dealer in works of art.
The Company provides management consulting services to the entity in exchange for a
management fee, which is equal to 50% of the entitys net income (excluding the
management fee and certain other specified revenues and expenses). Included in the Companys
consolidated assets as of March 31, 2005 is inventory with a carrying value of
approximately $3.7 million. Such inventory consists entirely of artwork and is the
collateral for the $3.7 million in outstanding loans discussed above, which are
eliminated in the consolidation. The Company has no equity investment in the entity.
|
|
The
Company accounts for its interest in the entity on a quarter lag applied on a consistent
basis. As of December 31, 2004, the entity had total assets of $5.0 million, total
liabilities of $4.6 million and capital of $0.4 million.
|
19
ITEM 2: MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR
THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2005 AND 2004
Seasonality
The
worldwide art auction market has two principal selling seasons, spring and fall.
Consequently, first and third quarter results of the Auction segment typically reflect
lower Aggregate Auction Sales (as defined in the chart below under Key Performance
Indicators) when compared to the second and fourth quarters and, accordingly, a net
loss due to the fixed nature of many of the Companys operating expenses. (See Note 2
of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part I, Item 1, Financial
Statements.)
Use of Non-GAAP Financial
Measures
GAAP
refers to generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America.
Included in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations are financial measures presented in accordance with GAAP and also on a
non-GAAP basis. When material, the Company excludes the impact of changes in foreign
currency exchange rates when comparing current year results to the prior year.
Consequently, such period-to-period comparisons are provided on a constant dollar basis by
eliminating the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates since the prior year.
Management believes that excluding the impact of material changes in foreign currency
exchange rates when comparing current year results to the prior year provides a more
meaningful discussion and analysis of material fluctuations in the Companys
operating results. Management also utilizes this non-GAAP financial measure in analyzing
its operating results.A reconciliation of each of the non-GAAP financial measures used in
this Form 10-Q to their most directly comparable GAAP financial measures is provided in
the appropriate sections of Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations below.
Overview
The
Companys first quarter results for 2005 reflect the continuing strength
of the international art market as auction commission revenues increased by
56%, or $21.5 million, when compared to the same period in the prior year and
private sale commission revenues remained at historically high levels, totaling
$5.1 million for the current period. However, because first quarter results
for 2004 included a one-time license fee of $45 million earned in conjunction
with the sale of the Companys domestic real estate brokerage business
(see Discontinued Operations below), as well as private sale commission
revenues related to the landmark private sale of the Forbes Collection of Faberge,
first quarter results for 2005 are substantially lower than those reported for
the same period in the prior year. The Companys pre-tax results from continuing
operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 are summarized
below (in thousands of dollars):
20
|
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
|
2005
|
2004
|
$ Change
|
% Change
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction and related revenues | |
$ 72,175 |
|
$ 58,853 |
|
$ 13,322 |
|
22.6 |
% |
License fee revenue | |
176 |
|
45,000 |
|
(44,824 |
) |
-99.6 |
% |
Other revenues | |
1,676 |
|
1,573 |
|
103 |
|
6.5 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total revenues | |
74,027 |
|
105,426 |
|
(31,399 |
) |
-29.8 |
% |
Expenses | |
82,578 |
|
78,036 |
|
4,542 |
|
5.8 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Operating (loss) income | |
(8,551 |
) |
27,390 |
|
(35,941 |
) |
|
* |
Net interest expense and other | |
(6,528 |
) |
(7,201 |
) |
673 |
|
9 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
(Loss) income from continuing operations before taxes | |
($ 15,079 |
) |
$ 20,189 |
|
($ 35,268 |
) |
|
* |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
* Represents a change in excess of
100%.
Management
currently anticipates a continuation of the strong international art market
and is encouraged by its 2005 auction sales results to-date, as well as by the
level of consignments for the remainder of the spring auction season. However,
despite this optimism about the art market, it is unlikely that Auction segment
results for the second quarter of 2005 will reach the level achieved during
the same period in the prior year as there will not be a sale equivalent to
the May 2004 single-owner sale of property of the Greentree Foundation, which
totaled approximately $213.1 million in Aggregate Auction Sales and included
the record breaking sale of Pablo Picassos Garcon a la Pipe
for $104.2 million. (See statement on Forward Looking Statements.)
Please
refer to the discussion below for a more detailed discussion of the significant factors
impacting the Companys results from continuing operations for the three months ended
March 31, 2005.
Discontinued Operations
In
the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company committed to a plan to sell its domestic
real estate brokerage business, Sothebys International Realty, Inc. (SIR),
as well as most of its real estate brokerage offices outside of the U.S.. On
February 17, 2004, the Company consummated the sale of SIR to a subsidiary of
Cendant Corporation (Cendant) and, as a result, recognized a gain
of $33.1 million in the first quarter of 2004. In conjunction with the sale,
the Company entered into an agreement with Cendant to license the Sothebys
International Realty trademark and certain related trademarks for an initial
50-year term with a 50-year renewal option (the License Agreement).
The License Agreement is applicable worldwide except in Australia. Additionally,
in the fourth quarter of 2004, the Company committed to a plan to sell its real
estate brokerage business in Australia. This business is the only remaining
component of the Companys former Real Estate segment. Accordingly, the
assets and liabilities of the Australia real estate brokerage business are classified
as held for sale in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, and its operating results
are reported as discontinued operations in the Consolidated Income Statements.
The Australia real estate brokerage business is not material to the Companys
results of operations, financial condition or liquidity. For additional information
related to these transactions, refer to Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements under Part I, Item 1, Financial Statements.
Revenues
For
the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, revenues from continuing operations
consisted of the following (in thousands of dollars):
21
|
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
|
2005
|
2004
|
$ Change
|
% Change
|
Auction and related revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction commission revenues | |
$ 60,108 |
|
$ 38,585 |
|
$ 21,523 |
|
55.8 |
% |
Auction expense recoveries | |
2,867 |
|
1,603 |
|
1,264 |
|
78.9 |
% |
Private sale commissions | |
5,133 |
|
13,262 |
|
(8,129 |
) |
-61.3 |
% |
Principal activities | |
406 |
|
1,986 |
|
(1,580 |
) |
-79.6 |
% |
Catalogue subscription revenues | |
2,338 |
|
2,143 |
|
195 |
|
9.1 |
% |
Other | |
1,323 |
|
1,274 |
|
49 |
|
3.8 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total auction and related revenues | |
72,175 |
|
58,853 |
|
13,322 |
|
22.6 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
License fee revenues | |
176 |
|
45,000 |
|
(44,824 |
) |
-99.6 |
% |
Other revenues: | |
Finance segment revenues | |
1,207 |
|
1,216 |
|
(9 |
) |
-0.7 |
% |
Other | |
469 |
|
357 |
|
112 |
|
31.4 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total other revenues | |
1,676 |
|
1,573 |
|
103 |
|
6.5 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total revenues | |
$ 74,027 |
|
$105,426 |
|
($ 31,399 |
) |
-29.8 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Key performance indicators: | |
Aggregate Auction Sales (a) | |
$355,980 |
|
$233,197 |
|
$ 122,783 |
|
52.7 |
% |
Net Auction Sales (b) | |
$305,052 |
|
$200,806 |
|
$ 104,246 |
|
51.9 |
% |
Auction commission margin (c) | |
19.7 |
% |
19.2 |
% |
N/A |
|
2.5 |
% |
Average loan portfolio | |
$ 76,322 |
|
$ 95,045 |
|
($ 18,723 |
) |
-19.7 |
% |
Legend:
(a)
Represents the hammer (sale) price of property sold at auction plus buyers
premium.
(b)
Represents the hammer (sale) price of property sold at auction.
(c)
Represents total auction commission revenues as a percentage of Net Auction
Sales.
22
Auction and Related
Revenues
For
the three months ended March 31, 2005, auction and related revenues increased $13.3
million, or 23%, to $72.2 million, when compared to the same period in the prior year.
This increase was principally due to higher auction commission revenues, and, to a lesser
extent, a higher level of expense recoveries; partially offset by lower private sale
commissions and principal activities. Each of the significant factors impacting the
overall change in auction and related revenues for the period is explained in more detail
below.
Auction
Commission RevenuesFor the three months ended March 31, 2005, auction commission
revenues increased $21.5 million, or 56%, to $60.1 million, when compared to the same
period in the prior year. The higher level of auction commission revenues during the first
quarter of 2005 was principally attributable to a significant increase in property sold at
auction and, to a lesser extent; a slight increase in auction commission margin. See
Aggregate Auction Sales and Auction Commission Margin below for a
detailed discussion of these key performance indicators.
Aggregate
Auction SalesFor the three months ended March 31, 2005, Aggregate Auction Sales
increased $122.8 million, or 53%, to $356 million, when compared to the same period in the
prior year. The higher level of Aggregate Auction Sales during the first quarter of 2005
was primarily due to a $43.0 million, or 37%, improvement in results from the winter
Impressionist and Contemporary sales in London and a $40.2 million increase in Aggregate
Auction Sales attributable to single-owner collections, including sales of property from
the Goddard Family Collection, the Collection of Baron de Rede, the Estate of Lillian
Rojtman Berkman and the Kennedy Family Homes, for which there were no comparable events in
the prior period. Also favorably impacting the comparison to the prior year are several
less significant increases in Aggregate Auction Sales related to recurring first quarter
sales such as those for Chinese Works of Art ($6.3 million) and Old Master Paintings ($4.9
million).
Auction
Commission MarginAuction commission margin represents total auction commission
revenues as a percentage of Net Auction Sales. Typically, auction commission margins are
higher for lower value works of art or collections, while higher valued property earns
lower margins.
Effective
January 1, 2005, the Company increased its buyers premium charged on certain auction
sales. In salesrooms in the U.S., the buyers premium is now 20% of the hammer (sale)
price on the first $200,000 and 12% of any remaining amount over $200,000. In foreign
salesrooms, these U.S. dollar thresholds were translated into an appropriate fixed local
currency amount upon the effective date. Previously, the buyers premium charged on
auction sales was generally 20% of the hammer (sale) price on the first $100,000 and 12%
of any remaining amount over $100,000.
For
the three months ended March 31, 2005, there was a slight improvement in auction
commission margin when compared to the same period in the prior year principally due to
the increase in the buyers premium rate structure discussed above.
Private
Sale CommissionsFor the three months ended March 31, 2005, private sale commissions
decreased $8.1 million to $5.1 million when compared to the same period in the prior year.
The lower level of private sale activity for the period reflects the traditionally
variable nature of such sales as 2004 first quarter results include the landmark private
sale of the Forbes Collection of Faberge, for which there was no comparable sale in the
current year.
Principal
ActivitiesPrincipal activities consist mainly of gains or losses on sales of
inventory, income or loss related to auction guarantees and gains or losses related to the
sales of loan collateral, as well as any decreases in the carrying value of the
Companys inventory. The level of principal activities in a period is largely
attributable to the level of auction guarantees issued by the Company, as well as the
economic environment, the supply of quality property available for investment and resale
and the demand by buyers for such property.
For
the three months ended March 31, 2005, principal activities decreased $1.6 million, or
80%, to $0.4 million when compared to the same period in the prior year. This decrease was
primarily due to a $2.2 million gain recognized in January 2004 on the sale of property
purchased with an art dealer through an unsecured loan from the Company, for which there
was no comparable event in the current year. Generally, property purchased pursuant to
23
such partnerships is sold
directly by the dealer, by the Company or at auction, with any net profit or
loss shared by the Company and the dealer. Also unfavorably impacting the comparison
to the prior year are inventory losses of $0.8 million recorded in the first
quarter of 2005 as a result of a decrease in the value of certain properties;
partially offset by an improvement in results from the sales of inventory during
the period. Also partially offsetting the overall decrease in principal activities
was favorable auction guarantee experience during the period.
License Fee Revenues
For
the three months ended March 31, 2005, license fee revenues decreased $44.8 million to
$0.2 million when compared to the same period in the prior year as first quarter results
for 2004 included a $45 million one-time license fee earned in conjunction with the
Companys sale of its domestic real estate brokerage business, for which there was no
comparable event in the first quarter of 2005. (See Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements under Part I, Item 1, Financial Statements.)
Finance Segment Revenues
For
the three months ended March 31, 2005, Finance Segment revenues were essentially unchanged
when compared to the same period in the prior year with the impact of a lower average
portfolio balance being almost entirely offset by higher interest rates and increased
facility fees.
Expenses
For
the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, expenses related to the Companys
continuing operations consisted of the following (in thousands of dollars):
|
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
|
2005
|
2004
|
$ Change
|
% Change
|
Direct costs of services |
|
$10,229 |
|
$ 7,120 |
|
$ 3,109 |
|
43.7 |
% |
Salaries and related costs | |
39,519 |
|
38,960 |
|
559 |
|
1.4 |
% |
General and administrative expenses | |
27,184 |
|
25,657 |
|
1,527 |
|
6.0 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization expense | |
5,646 |
|
5,895 |
|
(249 |
) |
-4.2 |
% |
Retention costs | |
|
|
285 |
|
(285 |
) |
-100.0 |
% |
Net restructuring charges | |
|
|
119 |
|
(119 |
) |
-100.0 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total expenses | |
$82,578 |
|
$78,036 |
|
$ 4,542 |
|
5.8 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Direct Costs of Services
Direct
costs of services consist largely of catalogue production and distribution costs, as well
as sale marketing costs and corporate marketing expenses. The level of direct costs
incurred in any period is generally dependent upon the volume and composition of the
Companys auction sales. For example, direct costs attributable to the sale of
single-owner collections are typically higher than those associated with various-owner
sales, mainly due to higher promotional costs for catalogues, special events and traveling
exhibitions.
For
the three months ended March 31, 2005, direct costs increased $3.1 million, or 44%, to
$10.2 million, when compared to the same period in the prior year. The increased level of
direct costs is consistent with the higher level of sales activity, and in particular,
single-owner sales, during the first quarter of 2005. Most prominently, direct costs for
the three months ended March 31, 2005 reflect an increase in catalogue production expenses
of $1.9 million principally attributable to the single-owner sales of property from the
Kennedy Family Homes and the Collection of Baron de Rede, for which there were no
comparable events in the prior year.
24
Salaries and Related Costs
For
the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, salaries and related costs consisted of
the following (in thousands of dollars):
|
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
|
2005
|
2004
|
$ Change
|
% Change
|
Full-time salaries |
|
$25,621 |
|
$24,893 |
|
$ 728 |
|
2.9 |
% |
Employee benefits | |
5,066 |
|
4,592 |
|
474 |
|
10.3 |
% |
Payroll taxes | |
3,152 |
|
2,941 |
|
211 |
|
7.2 |
% |
Option Exchange | |
1,663 |
|
2,144 |
|
(481 |
) |
-22.4 |
% |
Incentive bonus costs | |
736 |
|
1,426 |
|
(690 |
) |
-48.4 |
% |
Stock compensation expense | |
754 |
|
218 |
|
536 |
|
|
* |
Other | |
2,527 |
|
2,746 |
|
(219 |
) |
-8.0 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total
salaries and related costs |
|
$39,519 |
|
$38,960 |
|
$ 559 |
|
1.4 |
% |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
* Represents a change in excess of
100%.
For
the three months ended March 31, 2005, salaries and related costs increased $0.6 million,
or 1%, to $39.5 million, when compared to the same period in the prior year. For the three
months ended March 31, 2005, the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translations on
salaries and related costs was $0.7 million. Excluding the unfavorable impact of foreign
currency translations, salaries and related costs for the first quarter of 2005 were
essentially unchanged when compared to the same period in the prior year, as lower
incentive bonus costs and costs related to the Option Exchange program were almost
entirely offset by a higher level of employee benefit and stock compensation expenses, as
well as the impact of limited full-time salary increases taking effect during the period.
See discussion below for a more detailed explanation of each of these factors.
Incentive
Bonus CostsFor the three months ended March 31, 2005, incentive bonus costs
decreased approximately $0.7 million principally due to a reduction in performance-based
compensation awarded in connection with the lower level of private sale commissions earned
in the period. Private sale commissions for the first quarter of 2004 included the sale of
the Forbes Collection of Faberge, for which there was no comparable event in 2005.
Option
Exchange ProgramIn February 2003, the Compensation Committee approved an exchange
offer of cash or restricted stock for certain stock options held by eligible employees
under the 1997 Stock Option Plan (the Exchange Offer). The Exchange Offer was
tendered during the first half of 2004.
Compensation
expense related to the Exchange Offer decreased $0.5 million, or 22%, for the
three months ended March 31, 2005 when compared to the same period in the prior
year. In the first quarter of 2004, the Company recognized compensation expense
of $2.2 million representing the full cash payment made to employees upon acceptance
of the Exchange Offer on March 31, 2004. For the three months ended March 31,
2005, the Company recognized $1.7 million for the amortization of stock compensation
expense related to the issuance of approximately 1.1 million shares issued to
employees as a result of the Exchange Offer, the expense relating to which is
being amortized over the corresponding four-year vesting period. The amortization
of stock compensation expense related to the Exchange Offer is expected to be
approximately $4.6 million, $2.5 million and $1.2 million for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
Stock
Compensation ExpenseFor the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, stock
compensation expense related to restricted stock shares granted pursuant to the
Sothebys Holdings, Inc. 2003 Restricted Stock Plan (excluding shares issued in
conjunction with the Exchange Offer discussed above) was $0.8 million and $0.2 million,
respectively. The increase of $0.6 million when compared to the prior year is primarily
due to incremental
25
stock compensation expense associated with restricted stock grants
issued subsequent to the first quarter of 2004, including the grant of 276,000 shares of
restricted stock shares issued on February 7, 2005. The amortization of stock compensation
expense related to restricted stock shares granted pursuant to the Sothebys
Holdings, Inc. 2003 Restricted Stock Plan (excluding shares issued in conjunction with the
Exchange Offer discussed above) is expected to be approximately $3.4 million for the year
ended December 31, 2005.
Employee
Benefit CostsFor the three months ended March 31, 2005, employee benefit
costs increased $0.5 million when compared to the same period in the prior year.
The higher level of employee benefit costs was primarily due to a $0.7 million
increase in costs related to the Companys U.K. defined benefit pension
plan (see Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part I,
Item 1 Financial Statements) and, to a lesser extent, increased
health and welfare costs, primarily in non-U.S. locations. These increases were
partially offset by $0.6 million in severance costs incurred in the first quarter
of 2004 related to headcount reductions in Continental Europe, for which there
was no comparable event in the current period.
Full-time
SalariesFor the three months ended March 31, 2005, full-time salaries increased $0.7
million, or 3%, to $25.6 million, when compared to the same period in the prior year. For
the three months ended March 31, 2005, the unfavorable impact of foreign currency
translations was $0.5 million. Excluding the impact of unfavorable foreign currency
translations, full-time salaries increased $0.2 million, or 1%, to $25.1 million
principally due to limited salary increases, partially offset by savings achieved as a
result of certain headcount reductions.
General and
Administrative Expenses
For
the three months ended March 31, 2005, general and administrative expenses increased $1.5
million, or 6%, to $27.2 million, when compared to the same period in the prior year. For
the three months ended March 31, 2005, the unfavorable impact of foreign currency
translations on general and administrative expenses was approximately $0.4 million.
Excluding the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translations, general and
administrative expenses increased $1.1 million, or 4%, to $26.8 million.
For
the three months ended March 31, 2005, the overall increase in general and administrative
expenses is largely attributable to the following factors:
|
|
An increase
of $1 million in professional fees related to the Companys compliance
efforts for Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
|
|
An increase of $0.6 million for property taxes related to the Companys headquarters
building at 1334 York Avenue in New York as a result of a tax reassessment that became
effective on July 1, 2004. |
|
|
An increase of $0.4 million in travel and entertainment costs principally due to the
higher level of business opportunities during the quarter. |
|
|
A $1.1 million increase in other professional fees, partially due to consulting work
performed in conjunction with outsourcing the management of the Companys catalogue
production operations in the U.S. |
For
the three months ended March 31, 2005, general and administrative expenses were favorably
influenced by $2 million of transaction costs incurred in the first quarter of 2004
related to the consummation of the Companys agreement with Cendant to license the
Sothebys International Realty trademark for which there were no comparable fees
incurred in the current period.
Net Interest Expense
For
the three months ended March 31, 2005, net interest expense decreased $1.3 million when
compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to a $1 million increase in
interest income resulting from significantly higher balances of cash and short-term
investments during the period as well as higher interest rates partially resulting from a
change in investment composition. The decrease in net interest expense versus the prior
year was partially attributable to a $0.3 million reduction in interest expense due to the
fact that the Company had no
26
outstanding credit
facility borrowings during the period and lower amortization of the discount
related to the Department of Justice (DOJ) antitrust fine (see Note 12 of Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1, Financial Statements).
Income Tax (Benefit)
Expense
The
effective tax rate for continuing operations was approximately 33% for the first
quarter of 2005, compared to approximately 34% for the same period in the prior
year. The change in the effective rate was primarily attributable to non deductible
payments related to the antitrust settlement and other disallowable expenses;
partially offset by a permanent adjustment resulting from a current year tax
benefit on stock options exercised and certain other one-time adjustments.
FINANCIAL CONDITION AS OF
MARCH 31, 2005
This
discussion should be read in conjunction with the Companys Consolidated Statements
of Cash Flows (see Part I, Item 1, Financial Statements).
For
the three months ended March 31, 2005, total cash and cash equivalents related to the
Companys continuing and discontinued operations decreased $37.7 million primarily
due to the factors discussed below.
Net
cash used by operations was $122.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and
was due in part to a $44.9 million decrease in accounts payable, accrued liabilities and
other liabilities, primarily as result of the payment of incentive bonuses accrued in 2004
and the funding of $12 million of the fine payable to the DOJ in February 2005 (see Note
12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part I, Item 1, Financial
Statements), as well as the Companys loss from continuing operations during
the period. Cash used by operations was also significantly influenced by a $335.9 million
decrease in due to consignors, partially offset by a $270.3 million decrease in accounts
receivable, both principally resulting from the settlement of auction sales occurring in
the fourth quarter of 2004 and first quarter of 2005. Cash used by operations during the
period was partially offset by the collection of $12.5 million in cash as a result of the
settlement of a receivable related to the Companys partner in an auction guarantee;
which significantly contributed to the $11.4 million decrease in prepaid expenses and
other current assets.
Net
cash provided by investing activities was $81.5 million for the three months ended March
31, 2005 and was largely due to $185.5 million in cash proceeds received from the maturity
of short-term investments during the period, as well as the collection of maturing client
loans, partially offset by the purchase of $115.5 million in short-term investments and
the funding of client loans.
Net
cash provided by financing activities was $2.6 million for the three months ended March
31, 2005 and was almost entirely attributable to proceeds received from the exercise of
stock options.
27
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
AND COMMITMENTS
The
following table summarizes the Companys material contractual obligations and
commitments as of March 31, 2005:
|
Payments
Due by Period
|
|
Total
|
Less Than
One Year
|
1 to 3
Years
|
3 to 5
Years
|
After
5 Years
|
|
(Thousands of dollars) |
Long-term debt (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments | |
$100,000 |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$100,000 |
|
$ |
|
Interest payments | |
26,927 |
|
6,875 |
|
13,750 |
|
6,302 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Sub-total | |
126,927 |
|
6,875 |
|
13,750 |
|
106,302 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Other commitments: | |
York Property capital lease | |
402,454 |
|
18,318 |
|
38,574 |
|
40,237 |
|
305,325 |
|
Operating lease obligations | |
83,278 |
|
14,092 |
|
21,354 |
|
13,095 |
|
34,737 |
|
DOJ antitrust fine (2) | |
15,000 |
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment agreements (3) | |
4,406 |
|
3,525 |
|
881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Sub-total | |
505,138 |
|
50,935 |
|
60,809 |
|
53,332 |
|
340,062 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total | |
$632,065 |
|
$57,810 |
|
$74,559 |
|
$159,634 |
|
$340,062 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(1) |
Represents the aggregate outstanding principal and semi-annual interest payments
due on the Companys long-term debt. (See Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements under Part I, Item 1, Financial Statements.) |
(2) |
Represents the remaining fine payable to the DOJ. (See Note 12 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements under Part I, Item 1, Financial
Statements.) |
(3) |
Represents the remaining commitment for future salaries related to employment
agreements with a number of employees, excluding incentive bonuses. (See Note 10
of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part I, Item 1,
Financial Statements.) |
The
vendors commission discount certificates (the Discount Certificates)
that were distributed in conjunction with the settlement of certain civil litigation
related to the investigation by the DOJ (see Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements under Part I, Item 1, Financial Statements)
are fully redeemable in connection with any auction that is conducted by the
Company or Christies International, PLC (Christies) in the
U.S. or in the U.K. The Discount Certificates may be used to satisfy consignment
charges involving vendors commission, risk of loss and/or catalogue illustration.
The Discount Certificates will expire on May 14, 2008 and cannot be redeemed
subsequent to that date; however, any unused Discount Certificates may be redeemed
for cash at their face value at any time between May 15, 2007 and May 14, 2008.
As of March 31, 2005, the outstanding face value of unused Discount Certificates
that the Company could be required to redeem was $55.9 million.
The
Company has agreed in principle to extend the expiration date related to the
lease for its middle market auction salesroom at Olympia in Kensington, West
London for a maximum period of ten years. This extension, if consummated, will
result in additional operating lease commitments of approximately $22 million
over the full extended lease term.
(See
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements below for information on auction guarantees and
lending commitments.)
28
OFF-BALANCE SHEET
ARRANGEMENTS
Auction Guarantees
From
time to time in the ordinary course of business, the Company will guarantee to consignors
a minimum price in connection with the sale of property at auction. The Company must
perform under its auction guarantee only in the event that the property sells for less
than the minimum price and, therefore, the Company must pay the difference between the
sale price at auction and the amount of the auction guarantee. If the property does not
sell, the amount of the auction guarantee must be paid, but the Company has the right to
recover such amount through future sale of the property. Generally, the Company is
entitled to a share of the excess proceeds if the property under the auction guarantee
sells above a minimum price. In addition, the Company is obligated under the terms of
certain guarantees to advance a portion of the guaranteed amount prior to the auction. In
certain situations, the Company reduces its financial exposure under auction guarantees
through sharing arrangements with unaffiliated third parties.
As
of March 31, 2005, the Company had outstanding auction guarantees totaling $54.5 million,
the property relating to which had a mid-estimate sales price (1) of $64.1 million. The
Companys financial exposure under these auction guarantees is reduced by $6.3
million as a result of sharing arrangements with unaffiliated third parties. The property
related to such auction guarantees is being offered at auctions throughout 2005. As of
March 31, 2005, $14.1 million of the guaranteed amount had been advanced by the Company
and its partners, of which $13 million is recorded within Notes Receivable and Consignor
Advances in the Consolidated Balance Sheets (see Note 5 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements under Part I, Item 1, Financial Statements).
As
of May 6, 2005, the Company had outstanding auction guarantees totaling $112.3
million, the property relating to which had a mid-estimate sales price (1) of
$125.3 million. The Companys financial exposure under these auction guarantees
is reduced by $11.3 million as a result of sharing arrangements with unaffiliated
third parties. The property related to such auction guarantees will be offered
at auctions throughout 2005. As of May 6, 2005, $8.4 million of the guaranteed
amount had been advanced by the Company and its partners, of which the Company
will record its $7.2 million share within Notes Receivable and Consignor Advances.
|
(1) |
The mid-estimate sales price is calculated as the average of the low and high
pre-sale auction estimates for the property under the auction guarantee.
Pre-sale estimates are not always accurate predictions of auction sale results. |
(See
Note 11 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part I, Item 1,
Financial Statements.)
Lending Commitments
In
certain situations, the Companys Finance segment enters into legally binding
arrangements to lend, primarily on a collateralized basis and subject to certain
limitations and conditions, to potential consignors and other individuals who have
collections of fine art or other objects. Unfunded commitments to extend additional credit
were approximately $8.9 million at March 31, 2005. (See Note 10 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements under Part I, Item 1, Financial Statements.)
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
The
Company utilizes forward exchange contracts to manage exposures related to foreign
currency risks, which primarily arise from short-term foreign currency denominated
intercompany balances. Generally, such intercompany balances are centrally managed by the
Companys global treasury function. The Companys objective for holding
derivative instruments is to minimize foreign currency risks using the most effective
methods to eliminate or reduce the impacts of these exposures.
The
forward exchange contracts entered into by the Company are used as economic
cash flow hedges of the Companys exposure to short-term foreign currency
denominated intercompany balances. Such forward exchange contracts are typically
short-term with settlement dates no more than one month from their inception.
These contracts are not designated as hedging instruments under Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 133, Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended, and are
recorded in the
29
Consolidated Balance Sheets
at fair value, which is based on referenced market rates. Changes in the fair
value of the Companys forward exchange contracts are recognized currently
in earnings and are generally offset by the revaluation of the underlying intercompany
balances in accordance with SFAS No. 52, Foreign Currency Translation.
As
of March 31, 2005 and 2004, the Consolidated Balance Sheets included liabilities of $0.5
million and $0.7 million, respectively, recorded within Accounts Payable and Accrued
Liabilities reflecting the fair value of the Companys outstanding forward exchange
contracts on those dates. As of December 31, 2004, the Consolidated Balance Sheets
included assets of approximately $30,000 recorded within Prepaid Expenses and Other
Current Assets reflecting the fair value of the Companys outstanding forward
exchange contracts on that date.
(See
Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part I, Item 1, Financial
Statements.)
CONTINGENCIES
Legal
Actions The Canadian Competition Bureau is continuing to conduct an
investigation regarding anti-competitive practices relating to the commissions
charged by the Company and Christies for auction services during the period
1993 to 2000.
The
Company also becomes involved, from time to time, in various claims and lawsuits
incidental to the ordinary course of its business.
Management
does not believe that the outcome of any of the pending claims or proceedings
described above will have a material adverse effect on the Companys business,
results of operations, financial condition and/or liquidity.
Gain
ContingencyDuring the third quarter of 2004, the Company signed an
agreement for the sale of land and buildings at Billingshurst, West Sussex in
the U.K. (the Sussex Property). The completion of the sale is conditional
upon the receipt of planning permission for redevelopment of part of the site.
If completed, the sale of the Sussex Property would result in a pre-tax gain
in the range of approximately $5 to $6 million. The Company expects this contingency
to be resolved some time in 2005 or 2006.
(See
Note 10 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part I, Item 1,
Financial Statements.)
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL
RESOURCES
On
March 4, 2004, the Company entered into a new senior secured credit agreement with General
Electric Capital Corporation (the GE Capital Credit Agreement). The GE Capital
Credit Agreement is available through March 4, 2007 and provides for borrowings of up to
$200 million provided by an international syndicate of lenders.
Borrowings
under the GE Capital Credit Agreement are available for the funding of the Companys
ordinary working capital requirements and general corporate needs. The Company paid
arrangement fees of $3.0 million related to the GE Capital Credit Agreement, which are
being amortized to interest expense over the three-year term of the agreement. The
Companys obligations under the GE Capital Credit Agreement are secured by
substantially all of the assets of the Company, as well as the assets of its subsidiaries
in the U.S. and the U.K.
The
GE Capital Credit Agreement contains financial covenants requiring the Company to not
exceed $15 million in annual capital expenditures, to not make dividend payments and to
have a quarterly fixed charge coverage ratio of not less than 1.0. The GE Capital Credit
Agreement also has certain non-financial covenants and restrictions. The Company is in
compliance with its covenants.
At
the option of the Company, borrowings under the GE Capital Credit Agreement generally bear
interest equal to: (i) 1.25% plus the higher of the Prime Rate or the Federal Funds Rate
plus 0.5%, or (ii) LIBOR plus 2.5%. Pursuant to the GE Capital Credit Agreement, on a
quarterly basis, the applicable interest rate charged for borrowings is adjusted up or
down depending on the Companys performance under the quarterly fixed charge coverage
ratio tests.
For
the three months ended March 31, 2005, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under the
GE Capital Credit Agreement.
The
Company generally relies on operating cash flows supplemented by borrowings,
when necessary, to meet its liquidity requirements. The Company currently believes
that operating cash flows, current cash balances and borrowings available under
the GE Capital Credit Agreement will be adequate to meet its short-term and
long-term commitments, operating needs and capital requirements through March
4, 2007. Subsequent to March 4, 2007,
30
management anticipates that the Company will extend or renew the GE Capital Credit
Agreement or obtain other forms of long-term financing. Additionally, as a result of the
current level of cash balances, short-term investments and borrowings available under the
GE Capital Credit Agreement, the Company has considerably more liquidity and financial
flexibility than it has had in the recent past. It is the Companys present intention
to use this additional liquidity to expand its loan portfolio. (See statement on Forward
Looking Statements.)
The
Companys short-term operating needs and capital requirements include peak seasonal
working capital requirements, other short-term commitments to consignors, the potential
funding of the Companys client loan portfolio and the funding of capital
expenditures, as well as the short-term commitments to be funded prior to April 1, 2006
included in the table of contractual obligations above. Additionally, the Company expects
to contribute approximately $18 million to its U.K. defined benefit pension plan in 2005,
including a $15 million discretionary contribution expected to be made in the second
quarter of 2005. (See statement on Forward Looking Statements.)
The
Companys long-term operating needs and capital requirements include peak
seasonal working capital requirements, the potential funding of the Companys
client loan portfolio and the funding of capital expenditures beyond the next
twelve months and through March 4, 2007, as well as the funding of the Companys
long-term contractual obligations and commitments included in the table of contractual
obligations above through March 4, 2007.
In
addition to the short-term and long-term operating needs and capital requirements
described above, the Company is obligated to fund the redemption of the Discount
Certificates distributed in conjunction with the settlement of certain civil litigation
related to the investigation by the DOJ (see Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements under Part I, Item 1, Financial Statements). As discussed above,
the Discount Certificates are fully redeemable in connection with any auction that is
conducted by the Company or Christies in the U.S. or the U.K. The Discount
Certificates may be used to satisfy consignment charges involving vendors
commission, risk of loss and/or catalogue illustration. The Discount Certificates will
expire on May 14, 2008 and cannot be redeemed subsequent to that date; however, any unused
Discount Certificates may be redeemed for cash at their face value at any time between May
15, 2007 and May 14, 2008. As of March 31, 2005, the outstanding face value of unused
Discount Certificates that the Company could be required to redeem was approximately $55.9
million.
FACTORS AFFECTING
OPERATING RESULTS AND LIQUIDITY
Operating
results from the Companys Auction and Finance segments, as well as the
Companys liquidity, are significantly influenced by a number of factors, many of
which are not within the Companys control. These factors, which are not ranked in
any particular order, include:
|
|
The overall strength
of the international economy and financial markets and, in particular, the economies of the U.S., the
U.K., and the major countries or territories of Continental Europe and Asia (principally Japan and Hong Kong); |
|
|
Interest rates, particularly with respect to the Finance segments client loan
portfolio and the Companys credit facility borrowings; |
|
|
The impact of political conditions
in various nations on the international economy and financial markets; |
|
|
Government laws and regulations which the Company is subject to, including, but not
limited to, import and export regulations, cultural patrimony laws and value added taxes; |
|
|
The effects of foreign currency exchange rate movements; |
|
|
The seasonality of the Company's auction business; |
|
|
Competition with other auctioneers
and art dealers, specifically in relation to the following factors: |
|
(a) |
The
level and breadth of expertise of the dealer or auction house with respect to the
property; |
|
(b) |
The
extent of the prior relationship, if any, between the seller and the firm; |
31
|
(c) |
The
reputation and historic level of achievement by a firm in attaining high sale prices in
the propertys specialized category; |
|
(d) |
The
desire for privacy on the part of sellers and buyers; |
|
(e) |
The
amount of cash offered by a dealer, auction house or other purchaser to purchase the
property outright; |
|
(f) |
The
level of auction guarantees or the terms of other financial options offered by auction
houses; |
|
(g) |
The
level of pre-sale estimates offered by auction houses; |
|
(h) |
The
desirability of a public auction in order to achieve the maximum possible price; |
|
(i) |
The
amount of commission proposed by dealers or auction houses to sell a work on consignment; |
|
(j) |
The
cost, style and extent of presale marketing and promotion to be undertaken by a firm; |
|
(k) |
Recommendations
by third parties consulted by the seller; |
|
(l) |
Relationships
and personal interaction between the seller and the firms staff; and |
|
(m) |
The
availability and extent of related services, such as tax or insurance appraisal and
short-term financing; |
|
|
The amount of quality property being consigned to art auction houses (and, in particular,
the number of single-owner sale consignments), as well as the ability of the Company to
sell such property, both of which factors can cause auction and related revenues to be
highly variable from period-to-period; |
|
|
The demand for fine arts, decorative arts and collectibles; |
|
|
The success of the Company in attracting and retaining qualified personnel, who have or
can develop relationships with certain potential sellers and buyers; |
|
|
The success of
the Company in retaining key members of management; |
|
|
The demand for art-related financing; |
|
|
The uncertainty in future costs related to the Companys U.K. defined benefit pension
plan, as well as the impact of any decline in the equity markets or unfavorable changes in
interest rates on its assets and obligations; |
|
|
The impact of the variability in taxable income between the various jurisdictions where
the Company does business on its effective tax rate; and |
|
|
The ability of the Company to
utilize its deferred tax assets. |
FUTURE IMPACT OF RECENTLY
ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In
December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment. SFAS No. 123(R) requires the recognition of compensation
expense equal to the fair value of stock options or other share-based payments. Under SFAS
No. 123(R), the Company would have been required to implement the standard as of July 1,
2005. In April 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC)
announced the adoption of a new rule that amended the compliance date for SFAS No. 123(R).
The SECs new rule will allow the Company to implement SFAS No. 123(R) as of January
1, 2006. The Company will adopt SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective method,
which will result in the amortization of stock compensation expense related to unvested
stock options outstanding on the date of adoption, as well as any stock options granted
subsequent to that date. The Company expects the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) to result in
the recording of compensation expense in the range of $0.5 million to $1.0 million in 2006
related to unvested stock options outstanding on the date of adoption.
32
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This
Form 10-Q contains certain forward looking statements, as such term is defined in Section
21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, relating to future events and the
financial performance of the Company. Such statements are only predictions and involve
risks and uncertainties, resulting in the possibility that the actual events or
performance will differ materially from such predictions. Major factors which the Company
believes could cause the actual results to differ materially from the predicted results in
the forward looking statements include, but are not limited to, the factors listed above
under Factors Affecting Operating Results and Liquidity, which are not ranked
in any particular order.
ITEM 3: QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The
Company continually evaluates its market risk associated with its financial instruments
and forward exchange contracts during the course of its business. The Companys
financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, short-term
investments, notes receivable, consignor advances, long-term debt, the fine payable to the
DOJ and the settlement liability related to the Discount Certificates issued in connection
with certain civil litigation related to the investigation by the DOJ.
At
March 31, 2005, a hypothetical 10% strengthening or weakening of the U.S. dollar
relative to all other currencies would result in a decrease or increase in cash
flow of approximately $6.5 million. Excluding the potential impact of this hypothetical
strengthening or weakening of the U.S. dollar, the market risk of the Companys financial instruments has not changed significantly as of March 31, 2005 from that set forth in the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
At
March 31, 2005, the Company had $75.7 million of notional value forward exchange contracts
outstanding. Notional amounts do not quantify risk or represent assets or liabilities of
the Company, but are used in the calculation of cash settlements under such contracts. The
Company is exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by the two
counterparties to its forward exchange contracts, but the Company does not expect any
counterparties to fail to meet their obligations given their high credit ratings. (See
Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part I, Item 1, Financial
Statements, for additional information on the Companys use of derivative
instruments.)
ITEM 4:
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and
Procedures
As
of March 31, 2005, the Company has carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and
with the participation of the Companys management, including the Companys
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, the
Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule
13a-15(e)) were effective as of March 31, 2005.
Changes in Internal
Control over Financial Reporting
There
was no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal
control over financial reporting.
33
PART II:
OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1: LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
The
Canadian Competition Bureau is continuing to conduct an investigation regarding
anti-competitive practices relating to commissions charged by the Company and
Christies for auction services during the period 1993 to 2000.
The
Company also becomes involved, from time to time, in various claims and lawsuits
incidental to the ordinary course of its business.
Management
does not believe that the outcome of any of the pending claims or proceedings described
above will have a material adverse effect on the Companys business, results of
operations, financial condition and/or liquidity.
(See
Note 10 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part I, Item 1,
Financial Statements.)
ITEM 4: SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
On
May 4, 2005, the Company held its annual meeting of shareholders. The matters on which the
shareholders voted were:
|
(i) |
The election of three directors by the holders of the Companys Class A
Common Stock; |
|
(ii) |
The election of eight directors by the holders of the Companys Class B
Common Stock; |
|
(iii) |
The ratification of the Companys Executive Bonus Plan; and |
|
(iv) |
The ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the
Companys independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2005. |
The results of the voting are shown
below:
|
|
|
|
(i) |
ELECTION
OF CLASS A DIRECTORS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOMINEES |
|
|
FOR |
|
AGAINST |
|
WITHHELD |
|
|
|
|
Steven B.
Dodge |
|
|
36,914,492 |
|
0 |
|
6,528,668 |
|
|
Sharon Percy
Rockefeller |
|
|
36,910,898 |
|
0 |
|
6,532,262 |
|
|
Donald M.
Stewart |
|
|
35,946,101 |
|
0 |
|
7,497,059 |
|
|
|
(ii) |
ELECTION
OF CLASS B DIRECTORS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOMINEES |
|
|
FOR |
|
AGAINST |
|
WITHHELD |
|
|
|
|
Michael Blakenham |
|
|
161,141,180 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
Duke of Devonshire |
|
|
161,141,180 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
Jeffrey H.
Miro |
|
|
161,141,180 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
Allen Questrom |
|
|
161,141,180 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
William F.
Ruprecht |
|
|
161,141,180 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
Michael I.
Sovern |
|
|
161,141,180 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
Robert S.
Taubman |
|
|
161,141,180 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
Robin G.
Woodhead |
|
|
161,141,180 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
34
(iii) RATIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE BONUS PLAN
|
|
|
201,128,223 |
|
Votes were cast; |
|
195,035,772 |
|
Votes were cast for the resolution; |
|
5,553,388 |
|
Votes were cast against the resolution; and |
|
539,063 |
|
Votes abstained |
(iv) RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
|
|
|
205,584,340 |
|
Votes were cast; |
|
204,078,073 |
|
Votes were cast for the resolution; |
|
1,464,824 |
|
Votes were cast against the resolution; and |
|
41,443 |
|
Votes abstained |
ITEM
6: EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) Exhibits
10.1 Sothebys Holdings, Inc. Executive Bonus Plan, effective as of January 1, 2005.
31.1 Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002
31.2 Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1 Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2 Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(b)
Reports on Form 8-K
|
(i) |
On February 7, 2005, the Company filed a current report on Form 8-K under Item
8.01, Other Events. |
|
(ii) |
On March 18, 2005, the Company filed a current report on Form 8-K under Item
1.01, Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Item 2.02,
Results of Operations and Financial Condition and Item 9.01,
Financial Statements and Exhibits. |
35
SIGNATURE
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
SOTHEBY'S HOLDINGS, INC. |
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Michael L. Gillis
|
|
|
|
Michael L. Gillis |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, |
|
|
|
Controller and Chief |
|
|
|
Accounting Officer |
|
|
|
Date: |
May 10, 2005
|
|
36
Exhibit
Index
Exhibit
No. |
|
Description |
|
10.1 |
|
Sothebys
Holdings, Inc. Executive Bonus Plan, effective as of January 1, 2005. |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 |
|
32.1 |
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 |
|
32.2 |
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 |
37