Back to GetFilings.com
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [FEE REQUIRED]
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [NO FEE REQUIRED]
For the transition period from to
------------------ -----------------
Commission file number 0-24120
WESTERN OHIO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 31-1403116
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)
28 East Main Street
Springfield, Ohio 45501-0719
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (513) 325-4683
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such
requirements for the past 90 days. YES X . NO ___.
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to
Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained,
to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K.[ ]
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates
of the registrant, computed by reference to the closing price of such stock on
the Nasdaq National Stock Market as of February 21, 1997, was approximately
$49.7 million. (The exclusion from such amount of the market value of the shares
owned by any person shall not be deemed an admission by the registrant that such
person is an affiliate of the registrant.)
As of February 21, 1997, there were issued and outstanding 2,312,088
shares of the Registrant's Common Stock.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Parts II and IV of Form 10-K - Portions of the Annual Report to Stockholders for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996.
Part III of Form 10-K - Portions of the Proxy Statement for Annual Meeting of
Stockholders.
PART I
Item 1. Business
General
Western Ohio Financial Corporation (the "Company"), a Delaware
corporation, was organized in March 1994 for the purpose of becoming the savings
and loan holding company. The Company owns all of the outstanding stock of
Springfield Federal Savings Bank ("Springfield"), Mayflower Federal Savings Bank
("Mayflower") and Seven Hills Savings Association ("Seven Hills") (collectively,
the "Banks").
The Company and each of its subsidiaries are subject to comprehensive
regulation, examination and supervision by the Office of Thrift Supervision,
Department of the Treasury ("OTS") and by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation ("FDIC"). Springfield, Mayflower and Seven Hills are members of the
Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") System and their deposits are backed by the full
faith and credit of the United States Government and are insured up to
applicable limits by the FDIC.
The Company's primary market area covers Clark, Greene and Hamilton
Counties, Ohio and parts of contiguous counties, and is serviced through its
main office in Springfield, Ohio and nine branch offices in Cincinnati, Enon,
New Carlisle, Springfield, Yellow Springs and Beavercreek. At December 31, 1996,
the Company had total assets of $392.8 million, deposits of $233.2 million and
stockholders' equity of $54.0 million, or 13.7% of total assets. The Company's
Common Stock is traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol "WOFC."
On March 29, 1996, the Company acquired Mayflower. Each share of
Mayflower Financial Corporation, Cincinnati, Ohio, was exchanged for $28.50 in
cash, resulting in an approximate $10.0 million aggregate transaction. Mayflower
had total assets of $53.8 million as of March 31, 1996 following its acquisition
by the Company. The $53.8 million in total assets included core deposit goodwill
of $0.9 million and other goodwill of $2.4 million. The planned amortization of
goodwill for 1996 and 1997 will be $220,000 and $281,000, respectively. At
December 31, 1996, Mayflower had total assets of $68.8 million.
On November 12, 1996, the Company acquired Seven Hills. Each share of
Seven Hills Financial Corporation, Cincinnati, Ohio, was exchanged for $19.69782
in cash, resulting in an approximate $10.5 million aggregate transaction. Seven
Hills had total assets of $46.8 million as of December 31, 1996 following its
acquisition by the Company. The $46.8 million in total assets included core
deposit goodwill of $.9 million and other goodwill of $0. The planned
amortization of goodwill for 1996 and 1997 will be $25,000 and $146,000,
respectively. At December 31, 1996, Seven Hills had total assets of $46.8
million.
The Company has been, and intends to continue to be, a
community-oriented financial holding company offering a variety of financial
services to meet the needs of the communities it serves. The principal business
of the Company consists of attracting retail deposits from the general public
and investing those funds primarily in one-to-four family residential mortgage,
construction and commercial and multi-family real estate loans and, to a lesser
extent, consumer and commercial business loans, all primarily within the
Company's market areas.
2
The executive offices of the Company are located at 28 East Main
Street, Springfield, Ohio 45501-0719, and the telephone number at that address
is (513) 325-4683.
Market Area
Springfield's primary market area consists of Clark County and parts of
contiguous counties. Clark County is located in west-central Ohio. Clark
County's economic environment consists of a traditional industrial base, its
service and support industries and its close proximity to a major U.S. military
installation, Wright Patterson Air Force Base. Navistar Truck Manufacturers is
the largest employer in the county and its Clark County operations have provided
stable employment for the area. Clark State Community College and Wittenberg
University are also two major employers in the area. In 1995, Clark County had
an unemployment rate of 4.4% as compared to the State of Ohio at 4.9% and the
United States at 5.2%. The unemployment rate in Clark County increased to 5.7%
in 1996 as compared with 4.9% for the State of Ohio and 5.4% for the United
States.
Clark County's population, the rate of increase of which lagged behind
the State of Ohio and national averages, nonetheless can be characterized as
stable, with a population of approximately 148,000 people. From 1990 to 1995,
Clark County's population grew .24%. For 1996, Clark County's median housing
value was approximately $88,265. Additionally, Clark County's per capita income
also lagged behind the State of Ohio and national averages. In the event that
real estate prices in Ohio or the market area substantially weaken or economic
conditions decline, the Company may be adversely affected.
The Company has also entered the Cincinnati, Ohio area market through
affiliations with mortgage brokers and the acquisitions of Mayflower and Seven
Hills. The Cincinnati metropolitan area, centered in the southwest corner of
Ohio, has a population of approximately 1.8 million. The economic base is
generally considered well diversified and stable. Employment is provided by
companies representing a broad spectrum of industrial sectors, including
services, wholesale/retail, manufacturing, government, and finance. Several
"Fortune 500" companies have headquarters in the Cincinnati area. The
unemployment rate is approximately 4.0% and the median home price is $96,500.
Lending Activities
General. While the Company primarily focuses its lending activities on
the origination of loans secured by first mortgages on owner-occupied,
one-to-four family residences, it also originates multi-family and commercial
real estate and construction loans and, to a lesser extent, consumer and
commercial business loans in its market area. At December 31, 1996, the
Company's net loan portfolio totalled $287.6 million. At December 31, 1996, the
Company's gross loan portfolio totalled $295.1 million, of which $242.6 million,
or 82.2%, was comprised of permanent loans secured by one-to-four family
residences.
3
The department head of the loan department, and the chief underwriter
and her assistant have the authority to approve loans of up to $214,600, and up
to $249,999 with the approval of the Company's Executive Vice President, Finance
or Executive Vice President, Lending. The Executive Committee of the Board of
Directors review all completed applications and all applications that have been
denied to assure all avenues have been explored and that the applicant has been
treated in a fair manner. The Executive Committee also approves all loans in
excess of $250,000, any non-conforming loans, loan applications in excess of the
Company's loan to value policy limitations, and any exceptions to the Company's
lending policy.
The aggregate amount of loans that the Banks are permitted to make
under applicable federal regulations to any one borrower, including related
entities, or the aggregate amount that the Banks could have invested in any one
real estate project, is generally the greater of 15% of unimpaired capital and
surplus or $500,000. See "Regulation - Federal Regulation of Savings
Institutions." At December 31, 1996, the maximum amount which Springfield,
Mayflower and Seven Hills could have loaned to any one borrower and the
borrower's related entities was $4.5 million, $1.5 million and $1.4 million,
respectively. At December 31, 1996, the Banks did not have any loans outstanding
in excess of such limitation. The largest principal balance and commitment to
lend to any one borrower, or group of related borrowers at Springfield Federal
was $1.5 million secured by a medical building and a fast food restaurant, with
an additional $200,000 represented by a commercial line of credit. In addition,
three borrowers had a combined principal and commitment outstanding of $3.6
million at December 31, 1996. The first borrower's outstanding credit is secured
by a 74-unit apartment complex. The second borrower's outstanding credit is
secured by one to four family residences and land. The third borrower's
outstanding credit is secured by a mini warehouse storage facility and a 34-unit
apartment complex. The largest principal balance and commitment to lend to any
one borrower, or group of related borrowers at Mayflower, was $818,000 secured
by one to four family residential structures. The largest principal balance and
commitment to lend to any one borrower, or group of related borrowers at Seven
Hills, was $1.3 million secured by multiple warehouse facilities. The security
properties on all of these loans are located in the Company's market areas.
These loans are performing in accordance with their terms. The Banks did not
have any other loans to one borrower in excess of $1.0 million at December 31,
1996.
Management always reserves the right to change its emphasis on the
amount or type of lending in which the Company engages to adjust to market or
other factors, including changes in the Company's asset/liability management
policies.
4
Loan Portfolio Composition. The following information concerning the
composition of the Company's loan portfolio in dollar amounts and in percentages
(before deductions for loans in process, deferred fees and discounts and
allowance for losses) as of the dates indicated.
December 31,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
----------------- ---------------- --------------- --------------- ------------------
Amount Percent Amount Percent Amount Percent Amount Percent Amount Percent
----------------- ---------------- --------------- --------------- ------------------
(Dollars in Thousands)
Real Estate Loans:
One-to-four family............... $242,600 82.21% $131,262 84.93% $89,184 83.37% $ 86,816 83.97% $ 89,224 88.14%
Multi-family..................... 12,476 4.23 4,502 2.91 4,194 3.92 3,466 3.35 2,851 2.82
Commercial real estate........... 20,531 6.96 10,531 6.81 8,463 7.91 6,002 5.81 5,469 5.40
Construction..................... 10,965 3.71 5,405 3.50 3,252 3.04 6,312 6.10 2,945 2.91
-------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------
Total real estate loans....... 286,572 97.11 151,700 98.15 105,093 98.24 102,596 99.23 100,489 99.27
-------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------
Other Loans:
Consumer Loans:
Home equity.................... 2,188 0.74 474 0.31 77 0.07 --- --- --- ---
Deposit account................ 384 0.13 363 0.24 465 0.43 750 0.72 659 0.65
Home improvement............... 31 0.01 --- --- 6 0.01 29 0.03 58 0.06
Other secured.................. 3,689 1.25 942 0.61 788 0.74 --- --- --- ---
Retail mobile home............. --- --- 21 0.01 24 0.02 15 0.02 27 0.02
-------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------
Total consumer loans........... 6,292 2.13 1,800 1.17 1,360 1.27 794 0.77 744 0.73
-------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------
Commercial business loans........ 2,244 0.76 1,056 0.68 525 0.49 --- --- --- ---
-------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------- -------- ------ -------- ------
Total other loans............. 8,536 2.89 2,856 1.85 1,885 1.76 794 0.77 744 0.73
-------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------
Total loans................... $295,108 100.00% $154,556 100.00% $106,978 100.00% $103,390 100.00% $101,233 100.00%
======== ====== ======== ====== ======== ====== ======== ====== ======== ======
Less:
Loans in process................. (5,651) (2,768) (954) (3,225) (1,061)
Deferred fees and discounts...... (130) (538) (981) (1,291) (1,571)
Allowance for losses............. (1,716) (774) (774) (774) (37)
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total loans receivable, net... $287,611 $150,476 $104,269 $ 98,100 $ 98,564
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
5
The following table shows the composition of the Company's loan
portfolio by fixed and adjustable rates at the dates indicated.
December 31,
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
--------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------
Amount Percent Amount Percent Amount Percent
--------- -------- --------- -------- --------- ---------
(Dollars in Thousands)
Fixed-Rate Loans:
- -----------------
Real estate:
One-to-four family...................... $155,232 52.61% $111,117 71.89% $ 89,184 83.37%
Multi-family............................ 5,036 1.71 3,873 2.51 4,194 3.92
Commercial.............................. 9,276 3.14 9,307 6.02 8,463 7.91
Construction............................ 7,649 2.59 5,105 3.30 3,252 3.04
-------- ------ -------- ----- -------- -------
Total fixed-rate real estate loans... 177,193 60.05 129,402 83.72 105,093 98.24
-------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------
Commercial business...................... 178 .06 401 0.26 --- ---
Consumer................................. 3,642 1.23 1,326 0.86 1,282 1.20
-------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------
Total fixed-rate loans......... 181,013 61.34 131,129 84.84 106,375 99.44
-------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------
Adjustable-Rate Loans
- ---------------------
Real estate:
One-to-four family...................... 87,368 29.61 20,145 13.04 --- ---
Multi family............................ 7,440 2.52 629 0.41 --- ---
Commercial.............................. 11,255 3.81 1,224 0.79 --- ---
Construction............................ 3,316 1.12 300 0.19 --- ---
-------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------
Total adjustable-rate real
estate loans....................... 109,379 37.06 22,298 14.43 --- ---
-------- ------ -------- ----- -------- -------
Commercial business..................... 2,066 .70 655 0.42 525 0.49
Consumer................................. 2,650 .90 474 0.31 77 0.07
-------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------
Total adjustable-rate loans.......... 114,095 38.66 23,427 15.16 602 0.56
-------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------
Total loans.......................... 295,108 100.00% 154,556 100.00% 106,978 100.00%
-------- ====== -------- ====== -------- ======
Less:
- -----
Loans in process......................... (5,651) (2,768) (954)
Deferred fees and discounts.............. (130) (538) (981)
Allowance for loan losses................ (1,716) (774) (774)
-------- ------- -------
Total loans receivable, net........... $287,611 $150,476 $104,269
======== ======== ========
[RESTUBBED FROM TABLE ABOVE]
December 31,
---------------------------------------------------
1993 1992
---------------------- ----------------------
Amount Percent Amount Percent
------ ------- ------ -------
Fixed-Rate Loans:
- -----------------
Real estate:
One-to-four family...................... $ 86,816 83.97% $88,916 87.83%
Multi-family............................ 3,466 3.35 2,851 2.82
Commercial.............................. 6,002 5.81 5,411 5.35
Construction............................ 6,312 6.10 2,945 2.91
-------- ------ ------- ------
Total fixed-rate real estate loans... 102,596 99.23 100,123 98.91
-------- ------ ------- ------
Commercial business...................... --- --- --- ---
Consumer................................. 794 0.77 744 0.73
-------- ------ ------- ------
Total fixed-rate loans......... 103,390 100.00 100,867 99.64
-------- ------ ------- ------
Adjustable-Rate Loans
- ---------------------
Real estate:
One-to-four family...................... --- --- 308 0.30
Multi family............................ --- --- --- ---
Commercial.............................. --- --- --- ---
Construction............................ --- --- 58 0.06
-------- ------ ------- ------
Total adjustable-rate real
estate loans....................... --- --- 366 0.36
-------- ------ ------- ------
Commercial business..................... --- --- --- ---
Consumer................................. --- --- --- ---
-------- ------ ------- ------
Total adjustable-rate loans.......... --- --- 366 0.36
-------- ------ ------- ------
Total loans.......................... 103,390 100.00% 101,233 100.00%
------- ====== ------- ======
Less:
- -----
Loans in process......................... (3,225) (1,061)
Deferred fees and discounts.............. (1,291) (1,571)
Allowance for loan losses................ (774) (37)
-------- -------
Total loans receivable, net........... $ 98,100 $98,564
======== =======
6
The following schedule illustrates the maturities of the Company's loan
portfolio at December 31, 1996. Loans which have adjustable or renegotiable
interest rates are shown as maturing in the period during which the contract is
due. The schedule does not reflect the effects of possible prepayments or
enforcement of due-on-sale clauses.
Real Estate
------------------------------------------------
Multi-family Commercial business
One-to-four family and Commercial and Consumer Total
---------------------- ---------------------- --------------------- --------------------
Weighted Weighted Weighted Weighted
Average Average Average Average
Amount Rate Amount Rate Amount Rate Amount Rate
-------- -------- -------- -------- ------- -------- -------- -------
(Dollars in Thousands)
Due During
Periods Ending
December 31,
------------
1997(1)................ $ 31,115 % $9,872 % $2,554 % $ 43,541 %
1998................... 6,773 2,253 143 9,169
1999................... 6,963 3,338 1,007 11,308
2000 and 2001.......... 6,267 4,572 1,471 12,310
2002 to 2006........... 17,587 3,678 3,048 24,313
2007 to 2016........... 69,281 9,728 313 79,322
2017 and following..... 114,319 826 --- 115,145
- ----------
(1) Includes demand loans and loans having no stated maturity.
At December 31, 1996, the total amount of loans due after December 31,
1997 which have predetermined interest rates is $173.7 million, while $77.9
million loans due after such dates have floating or adjustable interest rates.
One-to-Four Family Residential Mortgage and Construction Lending. The
Company focuses its lending efforts on the origination of loans secured by first
mortgages on owner-occupied, one-to-four family residences. Residential loan
originations of this type are generated by the Company's marketing efforts, its
present customers, walk-in customers and referrals from real estate agents and
builders. At December 31, 1996, the Company's one-to-four family residential
permanent mortgage loans totalled $242.6 million, or 82.21% of the Company's
total gross loan portfolio.
At December 31, 1996, $155.2 million of the Company's one-to-four
family residential mortgage loans, or 52.61% of the Company's total gross loan
portfolio, had fixed interest rates. Historically, the Company has offered only
fixed-rate loans due to customer demand. For asset/liability management
purposes, the Company has recently begun offering adjustable-rate loans. From
time to time, the Company may purchase loans secured by one-to-four family
residences. See "- Originations, Purchases and Sales of Loans and
Mortgage-Backed Securities."
The Company currently originates up to a maximum of 30-year, owner
occupied one-to-four family residential mortgage loans in amounts up to 97% of
the appraised value of the
7
security property provided that private mortgage insurance is obtained in an
amount sufficient to reduce the Company's exposure to at or below the 80%
loan-to-value level. The Company also offers loans on owner occupied one-to-four
family residences in amounts up to 85% of the appraised value of the property
without requiring private mortgage insurance. Interest rates charged on these
loans are priced on a regular basis according to market conditions. Residential
loans do not include prepayment penalties. The Company also originates up to a
maximum of 30-year one-to-four family residential loans to nonowner-occupants,
with loan-to-value ratios of up to 80%.
In underwriting one-to-four family residential real estate loans, the
Company evaluates, among other things, both the borrower's ability to make
monthly payments and the value of the property securing the loan. Currently,
most properties securing real estate loans made by the Company are appraised by
independent licensed fee appraisers approved by the Board of Directors. In the
past, however, the Company has utilized in-house appraisers. The Company
requires borrowers to obtain title, fire and property insurance (including flood
insurance, if necessary) in an amount not less than the amount of the loan. In
prior years, the Company had accepted title opinions. Real estate loans
originated by the Company generally contain a "due on sale" clause allowing the
Company to declare the unpaid principal balance due and payable upon the sale or
disposition of the secured property.
The Company originates a limited number of loans to finance the
construction of one-to-four family residences. At December 31, 1996, the Company
had loans to finance the construction of one-to-four family residences totaling
$9.6 million, or 3.3% of the Company's loan portfolio. Substantially all of
these loans are made to individuals who propose to occupy the premises upon
completion of construction. Construction loans are generally structured for up
to a 30-year term with a six month construction phase, during which the borrower
pays interest only. Upon completion of the construction phase, these loans
continue as permanent loans of the Company. Loan proceeds are disbursed in
increments as construction progresses and as inspections warrant.
Multi-Family and Commercial Real Estate Lending. The Company has also
engaged in commercial and multi-family real estate lending in its market areas.
At December 31, 1996, the Company had $33.0 million of permanent commercial and
multi-family real estate loans, which represented 11.2% of the Company's gross
loan portfolio. The Company also has $1.4 million in construction loans secured
by multi-family and commercial real estate.
The Company's commercial and multi-family real estate loan portfolio is
secured primarily by apartment buildings, office buildings, strip shopping
centers, motels, nursing homes, restaurants and churches located in the
Company's market area. Multi-family and commercial real estate loans generally
have terms that do not exceed 15 years. Generally, the loans are made in amounts
up to 75% of the appraised value of the secured property. The Company analyzes
the financial condition of the borrower, the borrower's credit history, and the
reliability and predictability of the cash flow generated by the property
securing the loan. Currently, appraisals on properties securing multi-family and
commercial real estate loans originated by the Company are performed by
independent licensed fee appraisers.
8
Construction loans on multi-family and commercial real estate projects
are structured to be converted to permanent loans at the end of the construction
phase, which generally runs up to 12 months. These construction loans have rates
and terms which generally match any permanent multi-family or commercial real
estate loan then offered by the Company, except that during the construction
phase, the borrower pays interest only. These loans generally provide for the
payment of interest and loan fees from loan proceeds. At December 31, 1996, the
Company had $1.4 million of multi-family and commercial real estate construction
loans.
Construction and development loans are obtained principally through
continued business from developers and builders who have previously borrowed
from the Company, as well as referrals from existing customers and walk-in
customers. The application process includes a submission to the Company of
accurate plans, specifications and costs of the project to be
constructed/developed. These items are used as a basis to determine the
appraised value of the subject property. Loans are based on the lesser of
current appraised value and/or the cost of construction (land plus building).
In addition, the Company from time to time has purchased loans secured
by multi-family real estate. The Company, however, purchased no multi-family
real estate loans in fiscal 1996.
Loans secured by commercial and multi-family real estate properties are
generally larger and involve a greater degree of credit risk than one-to-four
family residential mortgage loans. Because payments on loans secured by
commercial real estate properties are often dependent on the successful
operation or management of the properties, repayment of such loans may be
subject to adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy. If the
cash flow from the project is reduced (for example, if leases are not obtained
or renewed), the borrower's ability to repay the loan may be impaired.
Consumer Lending. The Company offers secured consumer loans, including
home improvement loans, home equity loans, loans secured by savings deposits and
equity securities, and retail mobile home loans. The Company has plans to expand
its consumer lending portfolio. The Company currently originates all of its
consumer loans in its primary market area. The Company originates consumer loans
on a direct basis by extending credit directly to the borrower and on an
indirect basis by extending credit through dealers.
At December 31, 1996, deposit loans were $384,000 or 0.1% of the
Company's gross loan portfolio. Home equity loans were $2.6 million or 0.9% of
the Company's gross loan portfolio as of that date.
Consumer loan terms vary according to the type and value of collateral,
length of contract and creditworthiness of the borrower. Loans secured by
deposit accounts at the Company are currently originated for up to 90% of the
account balance with a hold placed on the account restricting the withdrawal of
the account balance.
The underwriting standards employed by the Company for consumer loans,
other than loans secured by deposits, include an application, a determination of
the applicant's payment history on other debts and an assessment of ability to
meet existing obligations and payments on the proposed loan. Although
creditworthiness of the applicant is a primary consideration, the
9
underwriting process also includes a comparison of the value of the security, if
any, in relation to the proposed loan amount.
Consumer loans may entail greater credit risk than do residential
mortgage loans, particularly in the case of consumer loans which are unsecured.
In such cases, any repossessed collateral for a defaulted consumer loan may not
provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance as a
result of the greater likelihood of damage, loss, depreciation or fluctuation in
value. In addition, consumer loan collections are dependent on the borrower's
continuing financial stability, and thus are more likely to be affected by
adverse personal circumstances. Furthermore, the application of various federal
and state laws, including bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount
which can be recovered on such loans. At December 31, 1996, all of the Company's
consumer loans were performing in accordance with their terms. However, there
can be no assurance that delinquencies will not occur in the future.
Commercial Business Lending. Commercial business loans have been added
to the list of the Company's products. The outstanding balance of unsecured
commercial lines of credit was $1.2 million as of December 31, 1996. Commercial
loans secured other than by mortgage had outstanding balances of $1.0 million as
of December 31, 1996. The purpose of these loans will generally be for working
capital or expansion of existing businesses. These loans have been priced at
prime plus a specified spread, or at the one year constant maturity treasury
index plus a specified spread. All of these loans are payable on demand.
Unlike residential mortgage loans, which generally are made on the
basis of the borrower's ability to make repayment from his or her employment and
other income and which are secured by real property the value of which tends to
be more easily ascertainable, commercial business loans typically are made on
the basis of the borrower's ability to make repayment from the cash flow of the
borrower's business. As a result, the availability of funds for the repayment of
commercial business loans may be substantially dependent on the success of the
business itself (which, in turn, is likely to be dependent upon the general
economic environment). The Bank's commercial business loans may be secured by
business assets. However, the collateral securing the loans may depreciate over
time, may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in value based on the
success of the business.
Originations, Purchases and Sales of Loans and Mortgage-Backed Securities
Loan originations are developed from advertising, continuing business
with depositors and borrowers, soliciting realtors and builders, walk-in
customers and correspondent relationships in other markets. Loans are originated
by salaried loan officers, field originators compensated by salary and
commission and outside mortgage companies. Loans are underwritten at the main
office of the Company and then submitted for approval to the head of the loan
department, the chief underwriter and her assistant, the Executive Vice
President, Finance, the Executive Vice President, Lending, and the Chief
Executive Officer, or the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors, as
appropriate, depending on the type and amount of the loan.
While the Company offers fixed-rate loans and has recently introduced
adjustable-rate loans, its ability to originate loans is dependent upon the
relative customer demand for loans in its market, which is affected by the
interest rate environment and other factors. In fiscal 1996,
10
the Company originated $32.3 million in fixed-rate loans and $50.8 million in
adjustable-rate loans. In order to mitigate the consequences of an almost
entirely fixed-rate mortgage portfolio, during 1994, management invested $18.3
million of the proceeds of Springfield's mutual to stock conversion and the
Company's initial offering of Common Stock in adjustable-rate obligations. In
addition, the Company purchased a total of $10.6 million agency-backed
collateralized mortgage obligations ("CMOs") and real estate mortgage investment
conduit ("REMIC") investments in fiscal 1995, all of which had adjustable rates.
The Company did not purchase any mortgage-backed securities in 1995. All of the
CMO and REMIC securities purchased in 1995 were purchased to be held in the
Company's available-for-sale portfolio. The Company also purchased $8.8 million
of loans in 1995 secured by owner-occupied, one-to-four family residences, most
of which had fixed interest rates. The Company has sold $17.8 million fixed rate
loans during 1996 and none during the preceding three years.
The Company also sold $21.8 million in CMO, REMIC and mortgage-backed
securities during 1996.
In periods of economic uncertainty, the ability of financial
institutions, including the Company, to originate large dollar volumes of real
estate loans may be substantially reduced or restricted, with a resultant
decrease in related loan origination fees, other fee income and operating
earnings.
11
The following table shows the origination, purchase, sale and repayment
activities of the Company for the periods indicated.
Year Ended December 31,
----------------------------
1996 1995 1994
------- ------- --------
(In Thousands)
Originations by type:
Adjustable-rate:
Construction.................................... $11,256 $ 300 $ ---
Real estate - one to four family............... 33,075 11,380 ---
- multi-family...................... 357 629 ---
- commercial........................ 2,567 1,224 ---
Commercial business............................. 1,860 130 525
Consumer - home equity.......................... 1,562 397 77
Other........................................... 119 --- ---
Fixed-rate:
Commercial business............................. 388 457 ---
Consumer........................................ 3,422 430 ---
Real estate - one-to-four family................ 28,029 38,043 20,629
- multi-family...................... 500 584 488
- commercial........................ 60 --- 2,464
-------- ------- -------
Total loans originated................... 83,195 53,574 24,183
-------- ------- -------
Purchases:
Acquisitions:
Loans........................................... 66,433 --- ---
MBS............................................. 20,729 --- ---
One-to-four family................................ 45,236 8,765 ---
Real estate - commercial.......................... --- --- ---
- multifamily......................... --- --- 600
Consumer.......................................... --- --- 824
Mortgage derivative securities.................... --- 10,636 5,342
Mortgage-backed securities........................ --- --- 15,476
-------- ------- -------
Total purchased............................ 32,398 19,401 22,242
-------- ------- -------
Sales and Repayments:
Loans:
Loan sale....................................... 17,783 --- ---
MBS sale........................................ 21,770 --- ---
MBS payments.................................... 7,567 --- ---
Loan payments................................... 37,730 --- ---
Mortgage-backed securities........................ --- --- ---
Principal repayments.............................. --- 22,638 28,080
Effect of classification to available-for-sale.... --- (975) 57
-------- ------ -------
Total reductions........................... 84,850 21,663 28,137
-------- ------- -------
Increase (decrease) in other items, net........... (2,484) 81 2,466
-------- ------- -------
Net increase (decrease)................... $128,259 $51,393 $20,754
======== ======= =======
12
Non-Performing Assets and Classified Assets
When a borrower fails to make a required payment on real estate secured
loans and consumer loans a notice is sent 30 days after payment is due. At 60
days after the payment is due, the Company generally institutes collection
procedures by notice and/or telephone. In most cases, delinquencies are cured
promptly; however, if a loan secured by real estate or other collateral has been
delinquent for more than 90 days, satisfactory payment arrangements must be
adhered to or the Company will initiate proceedings for foreclosure or
repossession.
When a loan becomes delinquent 90 days or more or when the collection
of principal or interest becomes doubtful, the Company will place the loan on a
non-accrual status and, as a result, previously accrued interest income on the
loan is taken out of current income. The loan will remain on a non-accrual
status as long as the loan is 90 days or more delinquent.
The following table sets forth information concerning delinquent loans
at December 31, 1996. The amounts presented represent the total remaining
principal balances of the related loans, rather than the actual payment amounts
which are overdue and are reflected as a percentage of the type of loan
category.
Loans Delinquent For:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
30-59 Days 60-89 Days 90 Days and over
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number Amount Percent Number Amount Percent Number Amount Percent
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Dollars in Thousands)
Real Estate:
One-to-four family 50 $1,900 .78% 12 $ 450 .19% 21 $ 768 .32%
Non-residential .. 1 210 1.02 -- -- -- 3 1,266 6.75
Consumer ......... 1 9 .13 4 540 8.05 1 10 .15
13
The table below sets forth the amounts and categories of non-performing
assets in the Company's loan portfolio. For all periods presented, the Company
has had no troubled debt restructurings (which involve forgiving a portion of
interest or principal on any loans or making loans at a rate materially less
than that of market rates). Foreclosed assets include assets acquired in
settlement of loans.
At December 31,
----------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
----------------------------------------------
(Dollars in Thousands)
Non-accruing loans:
One-to-four family ................ $ 674 $ 579 $ 75 $ 235 $ 312
Consumer .......................... 10 -- -- -- 346
Commercial real estate ............ 1,266 -- -- 294 --
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total .......................... 1,950 579 75 529 658
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Accruing loans delinquent more
than 90 days ....................... 94 -- -- -- --
Foreclosed assets ................... 55 -- -- -- --
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total non-performing assets ......... $2,099 $ 579 $ 75 $ 529 $ 658
====== ====== ====== ====== ======
Total as a percentage of total assets .52% .25% .04% .36% .44%
=== === === === ===
For the year ended December 31, 1996, gross interest income that would
have been recorded had the non-accruing loans been current in accordance with
their original terms amounted to approximately $84,000. The Company did not
include any interest income on such loans in 1996.
Non-Performing Assets. Included in the table above in nonaccruing
one-to-four family loans at December 31, 1996, were 14 loans secured by
single-family residences located in the Company's primary market area. Also
included in non-performing assets are one consumer loan and three commercial
real estate loans.
Other Loans of Concern. Not categorized as non-performing assets at
December 31, 1996, were $809,000 of potential problem loans. The potential
problem loans consisted of 15 single family residences and two commercial loans.
Classified Assets. Federal regulations provide for the classification
of loans and other assets such as debt and equity securities considered by the
OTS to be of lesser quality, as "substandard," "doubtful" or "loss." An asset is
considered "substandard" if it is inadequately protected by the current net
worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any.
"Substandard" assets include those characterized by the "distinct possibility"
that the savings bank will sustain "some loss" if the deficiencies are not
corrected. Assets classified as "doubtful" have all of the weaknesses inherent
in those classified "substandard," with the added characteristic that the
weaknesses present make "collection or liquidation in full," on the basis of
currently existing facts, conditions, and values, "highly questionable and
improbable." Assets classified as "loss" are those considered "uncollectible"
and of such little value that their continuance as assets without the
establishment of a specific loss reserve is not warranted.
14
Assets which do not currently expose the savings bank to sufficient risk to
warrant classification in one of the aforementioned categories, but possess
weaknesses, are required to be designated "special mention" by management.
When a savings association classifies problem assets as either
substandard or doubtful, it may establish general allowances for loan losses in
an amount deemed prudent by management. General allowances represent loss
allowances which have been established to recognize the inherent risk associated
with lending activities, but which, unlike specific allowances, have not been
allocated to particular problem assets. When a savings bank classifies problem
assets as "loss," it is required either to establish a specific allowance for
losses equal to 100% of that portion of the asset so classified or to charge-off
such amount. A savings bank's determination as to the classification of its
assets and the amount of its valuation allowances is subject to review by the
savings bank's District Director at the regional OTS office, who may order the
establishment of additional general or specific loss allowances.
In connection with the filing of its periodic reports with the OTS and
in accordance with its classification of assets policy, the Bank regularly
reviews the loans in its portfolio to determine whether any loans require
classification in accordance with applicable regulations. On the basis of
management's review of its assets, at December 31, 1996, the Bank had classified
a total of $1.5 million of its assets as substandard, $0 as doubtful and $0 as
loss. At December 31, 1996, total classified assets were $2.3 million, or 0.6%
of the Bank's assets.
Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is established
through a provision for loan losses based on management's evaluation of the risk
inherent in its loan portfolio and changes in the nature and volume of its loan
activity. Such evaluation, which includes a review of loans for which full
collectibility may not be reasonably assured, considers among other matters, the
estimated fair value of the underlying collateral, economic conditions,
historical loan loss experience and other factors that warrant recognition in
providing for an adequate loan loss allowance.
Real estate properties acquired through foreclosure are recorded at
fair value. If fair value at the date of foreclosure is lower than the balance
of the related loan, the difference will be charged-off to the allowance at the
time of transfer. Valuations are periodically updated by management and if the
value declines, a specific provision for losses on such property is established
by a charge to operations.
Although management believes that it uses the best information
available to determine the allowances, unforeseen market conditions could result
in adjustments and net earnings could be significantly affected if circumstances
differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the final
determination. Future additions to the Company's allowances will be the result
of periodic loan, property and collateral reviews and thus cannot be predicted
in advance. At December 31, 1996, the Company had a total allowance for loan
losses of $1.7 million, or 0.6% of loans receivable, net. See Notes 1 and 4 of
the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company's Annual Report to
Stockholders filed as Exhibit 13 hereto.
15
The following table sets forth an analysis of the Company's allowance
for loan losses.
Year Ended December 31,
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
-----------------------------------------
(Dollars in Thousands)
Balance at beginning of period $ 774 $ 774 $774 $ 37 $ 37
Beginning balance acquisition . 577 -- -- -- --
Charge-offs:
One-to-four family .......... 34 6 -- -- --
Recoveries .................... -- -- -- -- --
------ ------ ---- ----- ------
Net charge-offs ............... 34 6 -- -- --
Additions charged to operations 399 6 -- 737 --
------ ------ ---- ----- ------
Balance at end of period ...... $1,716 $ 774 $774 $ 774 $ 37
====== ====== ==== ===== ======
Ratio of net charge-offs during
the period to average loans
outstanding during the period .01% NM(1) --% --% --%
====== ====== ==== ===== ======
Ratio of net charge-offs during
the period to average non-
performing assets ............ 1.66% 2.99% --% --% --%
====== ====== ==== ===== ======
- ---------------
(1) Not meaningful.
The distribution of the Company's allowance for losses on loans at the
dates indicated is summarized as follows:
December 31,
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Percent Percent Percent
of Loans of Loans of Loans
in Each in Each in Each
Category Category Category
to Total to Total to Total
Amount Loans Amount Loans Amount Loans
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Dollars in Thousands)
One-to-four family.......................... $ 636 82.07% $287 84.93% $223 83.37%
Multi-family................................ 197 4.23 59 2.91 63 3.92
Commercial real estate...................... 504 6.96 253 6.81 210 7.91
Consumer.................................... 81 2.27 18 1.17 17 1.27
Construction................................ 46 3.71 22 3.50 58 3.04
Classified assets........................... 214 -- 108 -- 128 ----
Commercial.................................. 38 .76 21 0.68 12 0.49
Unallocated................................. -- -- 6 -- 62 --
------ ------ ----- ------ ---- ------
Total.................................. $1,716 100.00% $774 100.00% $774 100.00%
====== ====== ===== ====== ==== ======
16
Investment Activities
The Banks must maintain minimum levels of investments that qualify as
liquid assets under OTS regulations. Liquidity may increase or decrease
depending upon the availability of funds and comparative yields on investments
in relation to the return on loans. Historically, the Bank has generally
maintained its liquid assets above the minimum requirements imposed by the OTS
regulations and at a level believed adequate to meet requirements of normal
daily activities, repayment of maturing debt and potential deposit outflows. As
of December 31, 1996, the Banks' liquidity ratios (liquid assets as a percentage
of net withdrawable savings deposits and current borrowings) was in compliance
with applicable regulations. See "Regulation - Liquidity."
Federally chartered savings institutions have the authority to invest
in various types of liquid assets, including United States Treasury obligations,
securities of various federal agencies, certain certificates of deposit of
insured banks and savings institutions, certain bankers' acceptances, repurchase
agreements and federal funds. Subject to various restrictions, federally
chartered savings institutions may also invest their assets in commercial paper,
investment grade corporate debt securities and mutual funds whose assets conform
to the investments that a federally chartered savings institution is otherwise
authorized to make directly.
Generally, the investment policy of the Company is to invest funds
among various categories of investments and maturities based upon the Company's
need for liquidity, to achieve the proper balance between its desire to minimize
risk and maximize yield, to provide collateral for borrowings, and to fulfill
the Company's asset/liability management policies.
At December 31, 1996, the Company's cash and interest-bearing deposits
in other financial institutions totaled $15.6 million, or 4.0% of total assets.
The Company also has a $5.9 million investment in the common stock of the FHLB
of Cincinnati in order to satisfy the requirement for membership therein.
OTS regulations restrict investments in corporate debt and equity
securities by the Bank. These restrictions include prohibitions against
investments in the debt securities of any one issuer in excess of 15% of the
Bank's unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus as defined by federal
regulations, plus an additional 10% if the investments are fully secured by
readily marketable collateral. At December 31, 1996, the Banks were in
compliance with this regulation. See "Regulation - Federal Regulation of Savings
Institutions" for a discussion of additional restrictions on the Bank's
investment activities.
In November 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued a
special report, A Guide to Implementation of Statement 115 on Accounting for
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, which provided technical
interpretations and guidance relating to the adoption of SFAS No. 115. The guide
allowed an enterprise to reassess the appropriateness of the classifications of
all securities held at that time and to account for any resulting
reclassification at fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 115. One-time
reassessments had to be made no later than December 31, 1995. Accordingly,
management reclassified approximately $32.1 million of mortgage-backed
securities from "held to maturity" to "available for sale" on December 14, 1995,
to reflect its intention regarding those investments. See Note 2 to the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
17
The following table sets forth the composition of the Company's
investment portfolio at the dates indicated.
December 31,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Book % of Book % of Book % of
Value Total Value Total Value Total
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Dollars in Thousands)
Investment Securities:
U.S. government securities................ $ 794 1.50% $ --- ---% $5,884 18.27%
Federal agency obligations................ 35,298 66.79 12,039 45.06 10,015 31.10
------- ------ -------- ------ ------- ------
Subtotal............................... 36,092 68.29 12,039 45.06 15,899 49.37
------- ------ -------- ------ ------- ------
FHLB stock.................................. 5,862 11.09 1,602 6.00 1,293 4.01
FHLMC stock................................. 3 --- --- --- 990 3.07
------- ------ -------- ------ ------- -------
Total investment securities
and FHLB/FHLMC stock.................. 41,957 79.38 13,641 51.06 18,182 56.45
------- ------ -------- ------ ------- -------
Average remaining 4.78 years .24 years .56 years
life of investment securities..............
Other Interest-Earning Assets:
Interest-bearing deposits with banks...... 2,747 5.20 2,000 7.49 1,700 5.28
Federal funds sold........................ 8,148 15.42 11,075 41.45 12,325 38.27
------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------
Total.................................. $52,852 100.00% $26,716 100.00% $32,207 100.00%
======= ====== ======= ====== ======= ======
Average remaining life or term to
repricing of investment securities and
other interest-earning assets, excluding
FHLB/FHLMC stock........................... 3.77 years .12 years .30 years
The composition and maturities of the investment securities portfolio,
excluding FHLB of Cincinnati stock, are indicated in the following table.
December 31, 1996
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Less Than 1 to 5 Over 5
1 Year Years Years Total Investment Securities
---------- ---------- ---------- ------------------------------
Book Value Book Value Book Value Book Value Market Value
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------
(Dollars in Thousands)
U.S. government securities........................... $ 299 $ 495 $ --- $ 794 $ 799
Federal agency obligations........................... 1,000 3,898 30,400 35,298 34,842
------ ------ ------- ------- -------
Total investment securities.......................... $1,299 $4,393 $30,400 $36,092 $35,641
====== ====== ======= ======= =======
Weighted average yield............................... 4. 91% 5.985% 7.325% 6.29% 6.29%
Mortgage-Backed Securities. The Company had a $36.8 million portfolio
of mortgage-backed securities at December 31, 1996, all of which were insured or
guaranteed by the Federal National Mortgage Association ("FNMA") or the Federal
Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("FHLMC"). Accordingly, management believes that
the Company's mortgage-backed securities
18
are generally more resistant to credit problems than loans, which generally lack
such insurance or guarantees. Because these securities represent a passthrough
of principal and interest from underlying individual 30-year mortgages, such
securities do present prepayment risk. Any such individual security contains
mortgages that can be prepaid at any time over the life of the security. In a
rising interest rate environment the underlying mortgages are likely to extend
their lives versus a stable or declining rate environment. A declining rate
environment can result in rapid prepayment. There is no certainty as to the
security life or speed of prepayment. The geographic makeup and correlated
economic conditions of the underlying mortgages also play an important role in
determining prepayment. In addition to prepayment risk, interest rate risk is
inherent in holding any debt security. As interest rates rise the value of the
security declines and conversely as interest rates decline values rise.
Adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities have the advantage of moving their
interest rate within limits with the contractual index used, subject to the risk
of prepayment. Interest rate adjustments to $20.9 million of the Company's
adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities are tied to the One Year Constant
Maturity Treasury Index. At December 31, 1996, 86.6% of the Company's
mortgage-backed securities consisted of adjustable-rate mortgage-backed
securities.
Mortgage-backed securities can serve as collateral for borrowings and,
through sales and repayments, as a source of liquidity. For information
regarding the carrying and market values of the Company's mortgage-backed
securities portfolio, see Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements in the Company's Annual Report to Stockholders filed as Exhibit 13
hereto. Under the OTS risk-based capital requirement, mortgage-backed securities
have a risk weight of 20% (or 0% in the case of Government National Mortgage
Association securities) in contrast to the 50% risk weight carried by
residential loans. (See "Regulation.") Management has purchased mortgage-backed
securities in order to supplement loan originations and in 1994 converted a
portion of its fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities to adjustable-rate
mortgage-backed securities to mitigate the consequences of an entirely
fixed-rate mortgage portfolio. The CMO and REMIC securities held by the Company
carry certain risks. The principal represented by such securities may be repaid
over a longer period than that assumed in management's initial purchase analysis
which may hamper certain aspects of the Company's asset/liability management
strategy. In addition, these securities have maximum interest rate caps. If and
as market interest rate levels approach these caps, the value of the underlying
security will decline.
As of December 31, 1996, the Company held $11.0 million of CMO and
REMIC adjustable-rate securities. These securities are tied to the thirty day
London Interbank Offered Rate. Management purchased these investments to
supplement loan originations and to mitigate the consequences of its
predominantly fixed-rate mortgage portfolio.
19
The following table sets forth the contractual maturities of the
Company's mortgage-backed securities at December 31, 1996.
Due in Due in Due In Over December 31, 1996
1 to 3 years 5 to 10 years 10 Years Balance Outstanding
------------ ------------- ---------- --------------------
(In Thousands)
FHLMC.......................... $367 $251 $14,347 $14,965
FNMA........................... --- --- 6,853 6,853
CMOs and REMICs................ --- --- 11,028 11,028
GNMA........................... --- --- 3,997 3,997
----- ----- ------- --------
$367 $251 $36,225 $36,843
==== ==== ======= =======
Sources of Funds
General. The Company's primary sources of funds are deposits,
borrowings, repayment of loan principal, sales and repayments of mortgage-backed
securities, maturing investments in certificates of deposit, and funds provided
from operations. Borrowings, consisting of FHLB advances, may be used at times
to compensate for seasonal reductions in deposits or deposit inflows at less
than projected levels, and may be used on a longer-term basis to support
expanded lending activities.
Deposits. The Company offers a variety of deposit accounts having a
wide range of interest rates and terms. The Company's deposits consist of
passbook and statement savings accounts, NOW, and money market fund accounts,
and certificate accounts ranging in terms from six months to ten years. The
Company only solicits deposits from its market area and does not currently use
brokers to obtain deposits. The Company relies primarily on competitive pricing
policies, advertising and customer service to attract and retain these deposits.
The variety of deposit accounts offered by the Company has allowed it
to be competitive in obtaining funds and to respond with flexibility to changes
in consumer demand. The Company has become more susceptible to short-term
fluctuations in deposit flows, as customers have become more interest rate
conscious. The Company endeavors to manage the pricing of its deposits in
keeping with its asset/liability management and profitability objectives. The
ability of the Company to attract and maintain certificates of deposit accounts
and the rates paid on these deposits has been and will continue to be
significantly affected by market conditions.
20
The following table sets forth the savings flows at the Company during
the periods indicated. The flow of deposits is influenced significantly by
general economic conditions, changes in money market and prevailing interest
rates, and competition.
Year Ended December 31,
----------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
--------- -------- ---------
(Dollars in Thousands)
Opening balance............................................ $139,129 $117,529 $125,620
Net deposits (withdrawals)................................. 80,678(1) 15,359 (12,942)
Interest credited.......................................... 13,396 6,241 4,851
--------- --------- ---------
Ending balance............................................. $233,203 $139,129 $117,529
======== ======== ========
Net increase (decrease).................................... $ 94,074 $ 21,600 $ (8,091)
======== ========= =========
Percent increase (decrease)................................ 67.6% 18.4% (6.44)%
==== ==== ========
__________________
(1) Net deposit increase is primarily due to the Company's acquisition of
Mayflower and Seven Hills during fiscal 1996.
The following table sets forth the dollar amount of savings deposits in
the various types of deposit programs offered by the Company for the periods
indicated.
Year Ended December 31,
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Percent Percent Percent
Amount of Total Amount of Total Amount of Total
------ -------- ------ -------- ------ --------
(Dollars in Thousands)
Transactions and Savings Deposits:
- ----------------------------------
Passbook and Savings Accounts.............. $ 27,981 12.00% $24,437 17.56% $28,162 23.96%
NOW Accounts................................ 10,074 4.32 4,269 3.07 3,556 3.03
Money Market Accounts....................... 19,664 8.43 7,046 5.07 9,440 8.03
------- ------ -------- ------ --------- ------
Total Non-Certificates...................... 57,719 24.75 35,752 25.70 41,158 35.02
-------- ------ -------- ------ --------- ------
Certificates:
- -------------
0.00 - 3.49%.............................. 971 .42 465 .33 2,656 2.26
3.50 - 5.49%.............................. 45,927 19.70 27,171 19.53 42,145 35.86
5.50 - 7.49%.............................. 121,281 52.00 68,859 49.49 30,903 26.29
7.50 - 9.49%.............................. 7,305 3.13 6,882 4.95 667 .57
-------- ------ -------- ------ ---------- ------
Total Certificates.......................... 175,484 75.25 103,377 74.30 76,371 64.98
-------- ------ -------- ------ --------- ------
Total Deposits.............................. $233,203 100.00% $139,129 100.00% $117,529 100.00%
======== ====== ======== ====== ======== ======
21
The following table shows rate and maturity information for the
Company's certificates of deposit as of December 31, 1996.
0.00- 3.50- 5.50- 7.50- Percent
3.49% 5.49% 7.49% 9.49% Total of Total
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- --------
(Dollars in Thousands)
Certificate accounts maturing
in quarter ending :
- --------------------------------
March 31, 1997................................... $259 $14,654 $ 6,317 $ 1 $ 21,231 12.10%
June 30, 1997.................................... 232 12,580 16,985 --- 29,797 16.98
September 30, 1997............................... 121 5,149 15,204 4,606 25,080 14.29
December 31, 1997................................ 129 2,953 32,286 2,154 37,522 21.38
March 31, 1998................................... 19 4,801 13,742 --- 18,562 10.58
June 30, 1998.................................... 33 2,627 8,312 --- 10,972 6.25
September 30, 1998............................... 23 972 8,823 --- 9,818 5.59
December 31, 1998................................ 16 1,103 6,236 42 7,397 4.22
March 31, 1999................................... 51 453 1,919 --- 2,423 1.38
June 30, 1999.................................... 50 282 2,972 121 3,425 1.95
September 30, 1999............................... 17 --- 4,168 --- 4,185 2.38
December 31, 1999................................ 21 2 1,864 --- 1,887 1.08
Thereafter....................................... --- 351 2,453 381 3,185 1.81
---- ------- -------- ------ -------- -----
Total......................................... $971 $45,927 $121,281 $7,305 $175,484 100.00%
==== ======= ======== ====== ======== ======
Percent of total.............................. 0.55% 26.17% 69.11% 4.16% 100.00%
==== ===== ===== ==== ======
The following table indicates the amount of the Company's certificates
of deposit and other deposits by time remaining until maturity as of December
31, 1996.
Maturity
---------------------------------------------------
Over Over
3 Months 3 to 6 6 to 12 Over
or Less Months Months 12 months Total
------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(In Thousands)
Certificates of deposit less
than $100,000.......................... $18,897 $27,339 $55,944 $56,092 $158,272
Certificates of deposit of
$100,000 or more....................... 2,334 2,458 6,884 5,536 17,212
------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total certificates of deposit........... $21,231 $29,797 $62,828 $61,628 $175,484
======= ======= ======= ======= ========
Borrowings. Another source of funds includes advances from the FHLB of
Cincinnati. As members of the FHLB of Cincinnati, the Banks are required to own
capital stock and are authorized to apply for advances. Each FHLB credit program
has its own interest rate, which may be fixed or variable, and includes a range
of maturities. The FHLB of Cincinnati may prescribe the acceptable uses to which
these advances may be put, as well as limitations in the size of the advances
and repayment provisions.
22
During the years ended December 31, 1994 and 1993, the Banks utilized
FHLB advances to fund 30-year mortgages for asset/liability management purposes
and to supplement deposit outflows. During 1995, the Banks utilized a higher
level and a wider variety of FHLB advances than it had in the past. These
advances were utilized for increased investments and lending. The FHLB advances
were secured by the Bank's blanket agreement for advances and security agreement
and are not tied to specific investments or loans. Fixed rate advances of $20
million were taken to fund the purchase of callable securities. The remainder of
the borrowing was variable-rate or fixed-rate in nature and was intended to fund
mortgages.
The following table sets forth the maximum month-end balance and
average balance of FHLB advances for the periods indicated.
Year Ended December 31,
----------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
-------- ------- ------
(In Thousands)
Maximum Balance:
FHLB advances........................ $102,602 $31,528 $3,689
Average Balance:
FHLB advances........................ $ 76,837 $12,985 $2,510
The following table sets forth certain information as to the Bank's
FHLB advances at the dates indicated.
December 31,
---------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
-------- ------- ------
(Dollars in Thousands)
FHLB advances...............................$102,602 $31,528 $3,689
Weighted average interest rate of
FHLB advances..............................5.84% 6.11% 7.03%
Service Corporation Activities
Savings institutions generally may invest a limited percentage of their
assets in service corporations. In addition, federal savings institutions may
invest up to 50% of their regulatory capital in conforming loans to their
service corporations. In addition to investments in service corporations,
federal savings institutions are permitted to invest an unlimited amount in
operating subsidiaries engaged solely in activities in which federal savings
institutions may engage directly.
At December 31, 1996, Springfield had a net book value investment of
$20,000 in Springfield-Home Community Reinvestment Corporation
("Springfield-Home"), a 50%-owned service corporation, for low income housing
lending.
During fiscal 1996, Springfield Federal created an operating subsidiary
known as West Central Financial Services. The focus of this organization will be
to generate consumer lending
23
that does not overlap with the Company's current consumer lending. Springfield
capitalized the organization with $0.2 million. Additional money to fund loans
will be provided as an extension of credit to West Central Financial Services by
Springfield.
Competition
The Company faces strong competition, both in originating real estate
and other loans and in attracting deposits. Competition in originating real
estate loans comes primarily from other commercial banks, savings institutions,
credit unions and mortgage bankers making loans secured by real estate located
in the Company's market areas. The Company competes for real estate and other
loans principally on the basis of the quality of services it provides to
borrowers, and loan fees it charges, and the types of loans it originates.
The Company attracts all of its deposits through its retail banking
offices, primarily from the communities in which those retail banking offices
are located; therefore, competition for those deposits is principally from other
commercial banks, savings associations, credit unions and brokerage firms
located in the same communities. The Company competes for these deposits by
offering a variety of deposit accounts at competitive rates, convenient business
hours, and convenient branch locations with interbranch deposit and withdrawal
privileges at each.
REGULATION
General
Springfield and Mayflower are federally chartered savings associations
and Seven Hills is an Ohio-chartered savings institution, the deposits of which
are federally insured and backed by the full faith and credit of the United
States Government. Accordingly, the Banks are subject to broad federal
regulation, and in Seven Hills' case state regulation, extending to all its
operations. The Banks are members of the FHLB of Cincinnati and subject to
certain limited regulation by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System ("Federal Reserve Board"). As a savings and loan holding company, the
Company also is subject to federal regulation and oversight. The purpose of the
regulation of the Company and other holding companies is to protect subsidiary
savings associations. The Banks are members of the Savings Association Insurance
Fund ("SAIF"), which together with the Bank Insurance Fund (the "BIF") are the
two deposit insurance funds administered by the FDIC, and their deposits are
insured by the FDIC. As a result, the FDIC has certain regulatory and
examination authority over the Banks.
Certain of these regulatory requirements and restrictions are discussed
below or elsewhere in this document.
24
Federal Regulation of Savings Institutions
The OTS has extensive authority over the operations of federal savings
institutions. As part of this authority, Springfield and Mayflower are required
to file periodic reports with the OTS and are subject to periodic examinations
by the OTS and the FDIC. When these examinations are conducted by the OTS and
the FDIC, the examiners may require an institution to provide for higher general
or specific loan loss reserves. All savings associations are subject to a
quarterly assessment, based upon the savings association's total assets, to fund
OTS operations. Springfield's and Mayflower's OTS assessment for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1996 was $64,000 and $9,000, respectively.
The OTS also has extensive enforcement authority over all federal
savings institution and their holding companies, including the Company. This
enforcement authority includes, among other things, the ability to assess civil
money penalties, to issue cease-and-desist or removal orders and to initiate
injunctive actions. In general, these enforcement actions may be initiated for
violations of laws and regulations and unsafe or unsound practices. Other
actions or inactions may provide the basis for enforcement action, including
misleading or untimely reports filed with the OTS. Except under certain
circumstances, public disclosure of final enforcement actions by the OTS is
required.
In addition, the investment, lending and branching authority of the
Springfield and Mayflower are prescribed by federal laws and they are prohibited
from engaging in any activities not permitted by such laws. For instance, no
savings association may invest in non-investment grade corporate debt
securities. In addition, the permissible level of investment by federal
associations in loans secured by non-residential real property may not exceed
400% of total capital, except with approval of the OTS. Federal savings
associations are also generally authorized to branch nationwide. The Banks are
in compliance with the noted restrictions.
The OTS, as well as the other federal banking agencies, has adopted
guidelines establishing safety and soundness standards on such matters as loan
underwriting and documentation, asset quality, earnings standards, internal
controls and audit systems, interest rate risk exposure and compensation and
other employee benefits. Any institution which fails to comply with these
standards must submit a compliance plan. A failure to submit a plan or to comply
with an approved plan will subject the institution to further enforcement
action.
As a savings and loan association chartered under the laws of Ohio,
Seven Hills is subject to regulation, examination and oversight by the
Superintendent of the Ohio Division of Financial Institutions. Because Seven
Hills' deposits are insured by the FDIC, Seven Hills also is subject to
regulation and examination by the OTS, as its primary federal regulator, and by
the FDIC. Seven Hills must file periodic reports with the Ohio Superintendent
and the OTS concerning its activities and financial condition. Examinations are
conducted periodically by these federal and state regulators to determine
whether Seven Hills is in compliance with various regulatory requirements and is
operating in a safe and sound manner. Because it accepts federally insured
deposits and offers transaction accounts, Seven Hills is also subject to certain
regulations issued by the Federal Reserve Board. Seven Hills is a member of the
FHLB of Cincinnati.
25
Regulatory Capital Requirements. Seven Hills is required by OTS
regulations to meet certain minimum capital requirements. The following table
sets forth the amount and percentage level of regulatory capital of Seven Hills
at December 31, 1996, and the amount by which it exceeds the minimum
requirements. Tangible and core capital are reflected as a percentage of
adjusted total assets. Risk-based (or total) capital, which consists of core and
supplementary capital, is reflected as a percentage of risk-weighted assets.
At December 30, 1996
--------------------------------
Amount Percent
-------------- -------
(In thousands)
Tangible capital....................... $8,744 19.07%
Requirement............................ 688 1.5
------ ----
Excess................................. $8,056 17.57%
====== ====
Core capital........................... $8,744 19.0%
Requirement............................ 1,376 3.0
------ ----
Excess................................. $7,368 16.07%
------ =====
Risk-based capital..................... $8,960 40.99%
Risk-based requirement................. 1,749 8.0
------ ----
Excess................................. $7,211 32.99%
====== =====
Current capital requirements call for tangible capital of 1.5% of
adjusted total assets, core capital (which for Seven Hills consists solely of
tangible capital) of 3.0% of adjusted total assets and risk-based capital (which
for Seven Hills consists of core capital and general valuation allowances) of 8%
of risk-weighted assets (assets are weighted at percentage levels ranging from
0% to 100% depending on their relative risk). The OTS has proposed to amend the
core capital requirement so that those associations that do not have the highest
examination rating and exceed an acceptable level of risk will be required to
maintain core capital of from 4% to 5%, depending on the association's
examination rating and overall risk. Seven Hills does not anticipate that it
will be adversely affected if the core capital requirement regulation is amended
as proposed.
The OTS has adopted an interest rate risk component to the risk-based
capital requirement, through the implementation of that component has been
delayed. Pursuant to that requirement, a savings association would have to
measure that impact of an immediate 200 basis point change in interest rates on
the value of its portfolio, as determined under the methodology established by
the OTS. If the measured interest rate risk is above the level deemed normal
under the regulation, the association will be required to deduct one-half of
that excess exposure from its total capital when determining its level of
risk-based capital. In general, an association with less than $300 million in
assets and a risk-based implementation of the interest rate risk component, the
OTS may adjust the risk-based capital requirement on an individualized basis to
take into account risks due to concentrations of credit and non-traditional
activities.
The OTS has adopted regulations governing prompt corrective action to
resolve the problems of capital deficient and otherwise troubled savings
associations. At each successively
26
lower defined capital category, an association is subject to more restrictive
and numerous mandatory or discretionary regulatory actions or limits, and the
OTS has less flexibility in determining how to resolve the problems of the
institution. In addition, the OTS generally can downgrade an association's
capital category, notwithstanding its capital level, if, after notice and
opportunity for hearing, the association is deemed to be engaging in an unsafe
or unsound practice because it has not corrected deficiencies that resulted in
it receiving a less than satisfactory examination rating on matters other than
capital or it is deemed to be in an unsafe or unsound condition. All
undercapitalized associations must submit a capital restoration plan to the OTS
within 45 days after it becomes undercapitalized. Such associations will be
subject to increased monitoring and asset growth restrictions and will be
required to obtain prior approval for acquisitions, branching and engaging in
new lines of business. Furthermore, critically undercapitalized institutions
must be placed in conservatorship or receivership within 90 days of reaching
that capitalization level, except under limited circumstances. Seven Hills'
capital at December 31, 1996, met the standards for a well-capitalized
institution.
The Ohio Superintendent is responsible for the regulation and
supervision of Ohio savings and loan associations in accordance with the laws of
the State of Ohio and imposes assessments on Ohio associations based on their
asset size cover the cost of supervision and examination. Ohio law prescribes
the permissible investments and activities of Ohio savings and loan
associations, including the types of lending that such associations may engage
in and the investments real estate, subsidiaries and corporate or government
securities that such associations may make. The ability of Ohio associations to
engage in these state-authorized investments and activities is subject to
oversight and approval by the FDIC if such investments or activities are not
permissible for a federally chartered savings association. See "Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation." The Ohio Superintendent also has approval authority over
any mergers involving or acquisitions of control of Ohio savings and loan
associations. The Ohio Superintendent may initiate certain supervisory measures
and formal enforcement actions against Ohio associations. Ultimately, if the
grounds provided by law exist, the Superintendent may place an Ohio association
in conservatorship or receivership.
In addition to being governed by the laws of Ohio specifically
governing savings and Loan associations, Seven Hills is also governed by Ohio
corporate law, to the extent such law does not conflict with the laws
specifically governing savings and loan associations.
Insurance of Accounts and Regulation by the FDIC
The Banks are members of the SAIF, which is administered by the FDIC.
Deposits are insured up to applicable limits by the FDIC and such insurance is
backed by the full faith and credit of the United States Government. As insurer,
the FDIC imposes deposit insurance premiums and is authorized to conduct
examinations of and to require reporting by FDIC-insured institutions. It also
may prohibit any FDIC-insured institution from engaging in any activity the FDIC
determines by regulation or order to pose a serious risk to the SAIF or the BIF.
The FDIC also has the authority to initiate enforcement actions against savings
associations, after giving the OTS an opportunity to take such action, and may
terminate the deposit insurance if it determines that the institution has
engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, or is in an unsafe or unsound condition.
27
The FDIC's deposit insurance premiums are assessed through a risk-based
system under which all insured depository institutions are placed into one of
nine categories and assessed insurance premiums based upon their level of
capital and supervisory evaluation. Under the system, institutions classified as
well capitalized (i.e., a core capital ratio of at least 5%, a ratio of Tier 1
or core capital to risk-weighted assets ("Tier 1 risk-based capital") of at
least 6% and a risk-based capital ratio of at least 10%) and considered healthy
pay the lowest premium while institutions that are less than adequately
capitalized (i.e., core or Tier 1 risk-based capital ratios of less than 4% or a
risk-based capital ratio of less than 8%) and considered of substantial
supervisory concern pay the highest premium. Risk classification of all insured
institutions is made by the FDIC for each semi-annual assessment period.
The FDIC is authorized to increase assessment rates, on a semiannual
basis, if it determines that the reserve ratio of the SAIF will be less than the
designated reserve ratio of 1.25% of SAIF insured deposits. In setting these
increased assessments, the FDIC must seek to restore the reserve ratio to that
designated reserve level, or such higher reserve ratio as established by the
FDIC. The FDIC may also impose special assessments on SAIF members to repay
amounts borrowed from the United States Treasury or for any other reason deemed
necessary by the FDIC.
For the first six months of 1995, the assessment schedule for BIF
members and SAIF members ranged from .23% to .31% of deposits. As is the case
with the SAIF, the FDIC is authorized to adjust the insurance premium rates for
banks that are insured by the BIF of the FDIC in order to maintain the reserve
ratio of the BIF at 1.25% of BIF insured deposits. As a result of the BIF
reaching its statutory reserve ratio, the FDIC revised the premium schedule for
BIF insured institutions to provide a range of .04% to .31% of deposits. The
revisions became effective in the third quarter of 1995. In addition, the BIF
rates were further revised, effective January 1996, to provide a range of 0% to
.27%. The SAIF rates, however, were not adjusted. At the time the FDIC revised
the BIF premium schedule, it noted that, absent legislative action (as discussed
below), the SAIF would not attain its designated reserve ratio until the year
2002. As a result, SAIF insured members would continue to be generally subject
to higher deposit insurance premiums than BIF insured institutions until, all
things being equal, the SAIF attained its required reserve ratio.
In order to eliminate this disparity and any competitive disadvantage
between BIF and SAIF member institutions with respect to deposit insurance
premiums, legislation to recapitalize the SAIF was enacted in September 1996.
The legislation provides for a one-time assessment to be imposed on all deposits
assessed at the SAIF rates as of March 31, 1995, in order to recapitalize the
SAIF. It also provides for the merger of the BIF and the SAIF on January 1, 1999
if no savings associations then exist. The special assessment rate has been
established at .657% of deposits by the FDIC and the resulting assessment of
$798,000 for Springfield, $271,000 for Mayflower was paid in November 1996. This
special assessment significantly increased noninterest expense and adversely
affected the Company's results of operations for the year ended December 31,
1996. As a result of the special assessment, the Banks' deposit insurance
premiums was reduced based upon its current risk classification and the new
assessment schedule for SAIF insured institutions. These premiums are subject to
change in future periods.
28
Prior to the enactment of the legislation, a portion of the SAIF
assessment imposed on savings associations was used to repay obligations issued
by a federally chartered corporation to provide financing ("FICO") for resolving
the thrift crisis in the 1980s. Although the FDIC has promulgated regulations so
that the SAIF assessment is equalized with the BIF assessment schedule,
effective January 1, 1997, SAIF-insured institutions continue to be subject to a
higher FICO assessment. In this regard, the FDIC has imposed a FICO assessment
on SAIF-assessable deposits for the first semi-annual period of 1997 equal to
6.48 basis points per $100 of domestic deposits, while the FICO assessment on
BIF-assessable deposits for that same period equals 1.30 basis points per $100
of domestic deposits.
Regulatory Capital Requirements
Federally insured savings association are required to maintain a
minimum level of regulatory capital. The OTS has established capital standards,
including a tangible capital requirement, a leverage ratio (or core capital)
requirement and a risk-based capital requirement applicable to such savings
associations. These capital requirements must be generally as stringent as the
comparable capital requirements for national banks. The OTS is also authorized
to impose capital requirements in excess of these standards on individual
associations on a case-by-case basis.
The capital regulations require tangible capital of at least 1.5% of
adjusted total assets (as defined by regulation). Tangible capital generally
includes common stockholders' equity and retained income, and certain
noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and related income. In addition, all
intangible assets, other than a limited amount of purchased mortgage servicing
rights, must be deducted from tangible capital. At December 31, 1996, the Banks
did not have any intangible assets.
The OTS regulations establish special capitalization requirements for
savings associations that own subsidiaries. In determining compliance with the
capital requirements, all subsidiaries engaged solely in activities permissible
for national banks or engaged in certain other activities solely as agent for
its customers are "includable" subsidiaries that are consolidated for capital
purposes in proportion to the association's level of ownership. For excludable
subsidiaries, the debt and equity investments in such subsidiaries are deducted
from assets and capital. The Banks' subsidiaries are includable subsidiaries.
At December 31, 1996, Springfield had tangible capital of $30.3
million, or 11.0% of adjusted total assets, which is $26.1 million above the
minimum requirement of 1.5% of adjusted total assets in effect on that date.
At December 31, 1996, Mayflower had tangible capital of $6.7 million,
or 10.2% of adjusted total assets, which is $5.7 million above the minimum
requirement of 1.5% of adjusted total assets in effect on that date.
At December 31, 1996, Seven Hills had tangible capital of $8.7 million,
or 19.1% of adjusted total assets, which is $8.0 million above the minimum
requirement of 1.5% of adjusted total assets in effect on that date.
29
The capital standards also require core capital equal to at least 3% of
adjusted total assets. Core capital generally consists of tangible capital plus
certain intangible assets, including a limited amount of purchased credit card
relationships. At December 31, 1996, the Banks had no intangibles which were
subject to these tests. As a result of the prompt corrective action provisions
discussed below, however, a savings association must maintain a core capital
ratio of at least 4% to be considered adequately capitalized unless its
supervisory condition is such to allow it to maintain a 3% ratio.
At December 31, 1996, Springfield had core capital equal to $30.3
million, or 11.0% of adjusted total assets, which is $22.0 million above the
minimum leverage ratio requirement of 3% as in effect on that date.
At December 31, 1996, Mayflower had core capital equal to $6.7 million,
or 10.2% of adjusted total assets, which is $4.7 million above the minimum
leverage ratio requirement of 3% as in effect on that date.
At December 31, 1996, Seven Hills had core capital equal to $8.7
million, or 19.1% of adjusted total assets, which is $7.4 million above the
minimum leverage ratio requirement of 3% as in effect on that date.
The OTS risk-based requirement requires savings associations to have
total capital of at least 8% of risk-weighted assets. Total capital consists of
core capital, as defined above, and supplementary capital. Supplementary capital
consists of certain permanent and maturing capital instruments that do not
qualify as core capital and general valuation loan and lease loss allowances up
to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets. Supplementary capital may be used
to satisfy the risk-based requirement only to the extent of core capital. The
OTS is also authorized to require a savings association to maintain an
additional amount of total capital to account for concentration of credit risk
and the risk of non-traditional activities. At December 31, 1996, the Banks had
no capital instruments that qualify as supplementary capital and $1,170, $318
and $216 of general loss reserves, which was less than 1.25% of risk-weighted
assets for Springfield, Mayflower and Seven Hills, respectively.
Certain exclusions from capital and assets are required to be made for
the purpose of calculating total capital. Such exclusions consist of equity
investments (as defined by regulation) and that portion of land loans and
nonresidential construction loans in excess of an 80% loan-to-value ratio and
reciprocal holdings of qualifying capital instruments. The Banks had no such
exclusions from capital and assets at December 31, 1996.
In determining the amount of risk-weighted assets, all assets,
including certain off-balance sheet items, will be multiplied by a risk weight,
ranging from 0% to 100%, based on the risk inherent in the type of asset. For
example, the OTS has assigned a risk weight of 50% for prudently underwritten
permanent one-to-four family first lien mortgage loans not more than 90 days
delinquent and having a loan-to-value ratio of not more than 80% at origination
unless insured to such ratio by an insurer approved by the FNMA or FHLMC.
OTS regulations also require that every savings association with more
than normal interest rate risk exposure to deduct from its total capital, for
purposes of determining compliance with
30
such requirement, an amount equal to 50% of its interest-rate risk exposure
multiplied by the present value of its assets. This exposure is a measure of the
potential decline in the net portfolio value of a savings association, greater
than 2% of the present value of its assets, based upon a hypothetical 200 basis
point increase or decrease in interest rates (whichever results in a greater
decline). Net portfolio value is the present value of expected cash flows from
assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet contracts. The rule will not become
effective until the OTS evaluates the process by which savings associations may
appeal an interest rate risk deduction determination. It is uncertain as to when
this evaluation may be completed. Any savings institution with less than $300
million in assets and a total capital ratio in excess of 12% is exempt from this
requirement unless the OTS determines otherwise.
On December 31, 1996, Springfield had total capital (as defined above)
of $31.4 million (including $30.3 million in core capital and $1,170 of general
loss reserves) and risk-weighted assets of $144.3 million; or total capital of
21.8% of risk-weighted assets. This amount was $19.9 million above the 8%
requirement in effect on that date.
On December 31, 1996, Mayflower had total capital (as defined above) of
$7.0 million (including $6.7 million in core capital and $318 of general loss
reserves) and risk-weighted assets of $36.9 million; or total capital of 19.1%
of risk-weighted assets. This amount was $4.1 million above the 8% requirement
in effect on that date.
On December 31, 1996, Seven Hills had total capital (as defined above)
of $9.0 million (including $8.7 million in core capital and $218 of general loss
reserves) and risk-weighted assets of $21.9 million; or total capital of 41.0%
of risk-weighted assets. This amount was $7.2 million above the 8% requirement
in effect on that date.
The OTS and the FDIC are authorized and, under certain circumstances
required, to take certain actions against savings associations that fail to meet
their capital requirements. The OTS is generally required to take action to
restrict the activities of an "undercapitalized association" (generally defined
to be one with less than either a 4% core capital ratio, a 4% Tier 1
risked-based capital ratio or an 8% risk-based capital ratio). Any such
association must submit a capital restoration plan and until such plan is
approved by the OTS may not increase its assets, acquire another institution,
establish a branch or engage in any new activities, and generally may not make
capital distributions. The OTS is authorized to impose the additional
restrictions that are applicable to significantly undercapitalized associations.
As a condition to the approval of the capital restoration plan, any
company controlling an undercapitalized association must agree that it will
enter into a limited capital maintenance guarantee with respect to the
institution's achievement of its capital requirements.
Any savings association that fails to comply with its capital plan or
is "significantly undercapitalized" (i.e., Tier 1 risk-based or core capital
ratios of less than 3% or a risk-based capital ratio of less than 6%) must be
made subject to one or more of additional specified actions and operating
restrictions which may cover all aspects of its operations and include a forced
merger or acquisition of the association. An association that becomes
"critically undercapitalized" (i.e., a tangible capital ratio of 2% or less) is
subject to further mandatory restrictions on its activities in addition to those
applicable to significantly undercapitalized
31
associations. In addition, the OTS must appoint a receiver (or conservator with
the concurrence of the FDIC) for a savings association, with certain limited
exceptions, within 90 days after it becomes critically undercapitalized. Any
undercapitalized association is also subject to the general enforcement
authority of the OTS and the FDIC, including the appointment of a conservator or
a receiver.
The OTS is also generally authorized to reclassify an association into
a lower capital category and impose the restrictions applicable to such category
if the institution is engaged in unsafe or unsound practices or is in an unsafe
or unsound condition.
The imposition by the OTS or the FDIC of any of these measures on the
Banks may have a substantial adverse effect on the Company's operations and
profitability. The Company's stockholders do not have preemptive rights, and
therefore, if the Company is directed by the OTS or the FDIC to issue additional
shares of Common Stock, such issuance may result in the dilution in the
percentage of ownership of the Company.
Limitations on Dividends and Other Capital Distributions
OTS regulations impose various restrictions on savings associations
with respect to their ability to make distributions of capital which include
dividends, stock redemptions or repurchases, cash-out mergers and other
transactions charged to the capital account. OTS regulations also prohibit a
savings association from declaring or paying any dividends or from repurchasing
any of its stock if, as a result, the regulatory capital of the association
would be reduced below the amount required to be maintained for the liquidation
account established in connection with its mutual to stock conversion.
Generally, savings associations that before and after the proposed
distribution meet their capital requirements, may make capital distributions
during any calendar year equal to the greater of 100% of net income for the
year-to-date plus 50% of the amount by which the lesser of the association's
tangible, core or risk-based capital exceeds its capital requirement for such
capital component, as measured at the beginning of the calendar year, or 75% of
their net income for the most recent four quarter period. However, an
association deemed to be in need of more than normal supervision by the OTS may
have its dividend authority restricted by the OTS. The Banks may pay dividends
in accordance with this general authority.
Savings associations proposing to make any capital distribution need
only submit written notice to the OTS 30 days prior to such distribution.
Savings associations that do not, or would not meet their current minimum
capital requirements following a proposed capital distribution, however, must
obtain OTS approval prior to making such distribution. The OTS may object to the
distribution during that 30-day period notice based on safety and soundness
concerns. See "- Regulatory Capital Requirements."
The OTS has proposed regulations that would revise the current capital
distribution restrictions. Under the proposal a savings association may make a
capital distribution without notice to the OTS (unless it is a subsidiary of a
holding company) provided that it has a CAMEL 1 or 2 rating, is of supervisory
concern, and would remain adequately capitalized (as defined in the OTS prompt
corrective action regulations) following the proposed distribution. Savings
32
associations that would remain adequately capitalized following the proposed
distribution but do not meet the other noted requirements must notify the OTS 30
days prior to declaring a capital distribution. The OTS stated it will generally
regard as permissible that amount of capital distributions that do not exceed
50% of the institution's excess regulatory capital plus net income to date
during the calendar year. A savings association may not make a capital
distribution without prior approval of the OTS and the FDIC if it is
undercapitalized before, or as a result of, such a distribution. As under the
current rule, the OTS may object to a capital distribution if it would
constitute an unsafe or unsound practice. No assurance may be given as to
whether or in what form the regulations may be adopted.
Liquidity
All savings associations are required to maintain an average daily
balance of liquid assets equal to a certain percentage of the sum of its average
daily balance of net withdrawable deposit accounts and borrowings payable in one
year or less. This liquid asset ratio requirement may vary from time to time
(between 4% and 10%) depending upon economic conditions and savings flows of all
savings associations. At the present time, the minimum liquid asset ratio is 5%.
In addition, short-term liquid assets (e.g., cash, certain time
deposits, certain bankers acceptances and short-term United States Treasury
obligations) currently must constitute at least 1% of the association's average
daily balance of net withdrawable deposit accounts and current borrowings.
Penalties may be imposed upon associations for violations of either liquid asset
ratio requirement. At December 31, 1996, Springfield, Mayflower and Seven Hills
were in compliance with both requirements, with an overall liquid asset ratio of
5.6%, 6.8% and 11.7% and a short-term liquid assets ratio of 4.6%, 2.3% and
10.3%, respectively.
Qualified Thrift Lender Test
All savings associations are required to meet a qualified thrift lender
("QTL") test to avoid certain restrictions on their operations. This test
requires a savings association to have at least 65% of its portfolio assets (as
defined by regulation) in qualified thrift investments on a monthly average for
nine out of every 12 months on a rolling basis. As an alternative, the savings
association may maintain 60% of its assets in those assets specified in Section
7701(a)(19) of the Internal Revenue Code. Under either test, such assets
primarily consist of residential housing related loans and investments. At
December 31, 1996, the Banks met the test and have always met the test since its
effective date.
Any savings association that fails to meet the QTL test must convert to
a national bank charter, unless it requalifies as a QTL and thereafter remains a
QTL. If an association does not requalify and converts to a national bank
charter, it must remain SAIF-insured until the FDIC permits it to transfer to
the BIF. If such an association has not yet requalified or converted to a
national bank, its new investments and activities are limited to those
permissible for both a savings association and a national bank, and it is
limited to national bank branching rights in its home state. In addition, the
association is immediately ineligible to receive any new FHLB borrowings and is
subject to national bank limits for payment of dividends. If such association
has not requalified or converted to a national bank within three years after the
failure, it must divest of all investments and cease all activities not
permissible for a national bank. In addition,
33
it must repay promptly any outstanding FHLB borrowings, which may result in
prepayment penalties. If any institution that fails the QTL test is controlled
by a holding company, then within one year after the failure, the holding
company must register as a bank holding company and become subject to all
restrictions on bank holding companies. (See "- Holding Company Regulation.")
Community Reinvestment Act
Under the Community Reinvestment Act ("CRA"), every FDIC insured
institution has a continuing and affirmative obligation consistent with safe and
sound banking practices to help meet the credit needs of its entire community,
including low and moderate income neighborhoods. The CRA does not establish
specific lending requirements or programs for financial institutions nor does it
limit an institution's discretion to develop the types of products and services
that it believes are best suited to its particular community, consistent with
the CRA. The CRA requires the OTS, in connection with the examination of the
Banks, to assess the institution's record of meeting the credit needs of its
community and to take such record into account in its evaluation of certain
applications, such as a merger or the establishment of a branch, by the Banks.
An unsatisfactory rating may be used as the basis for the denial of an
application by the OTS.
The federal banking agencies, including the OTS, have recently revised
the CRA regulations and the methodology for determining an institution's
compliance with the CRA. Due to the heightened attention being given to the CRA
in the past few years, the Bank may be required to devote additional funds for
investment and lending in its local community. Springfield, Mayflower and Seven
Hills were examined for CRA compliance in 1994 and received a rating of
satisfactory.
Transactions with Affiliates
Generally, transactions between a savings association or its
subsidiaries and its affiliates are required to be on terms as favorable to the
association as transactions with non-affiliates. In addition, certain of these
transactions, such as loans to an affiliate, are restricted to a percentage of
the association's capital. Affiliates of the Banks include the Company and any
company which is under common control with the Banks. In addition, a savings
association may not lend to any affiliate engaged in activities not permissible
for a bank holding company or acquire the securities of most affiliates.
Springfield-Home is not deemed an affiliate; however, the OTS has the discretion
to treat subsidiaries of savings institutions as affiliates on a case by case
basis.
Certain transactions with directors, officers or controlling persons
are also subject to conflict of interest regulations enforced by the OTS. These
conflict of interest regulations and other statutes also impose restrictions on
loans to such persons and their related interests. Among other things, such
loans must be made on terms substantially the same as for loans to unaffiliated
individuals.
34
Holding Company Regulation
The Company is a savings and loan holding company subject to regulatory
oversight by the OTS. As such, the Company is required to register and file
reports with the OTS and is subject to regulation and examination by the OTS. In
addition, the OTS has enforcement authority over the Company and its non-savings
association subsidiaries which also permits the OTS to restrict or prohibit
activities that are determined to be a serious risk to the subsidiary savings
association.
The Company is a multiple savings and loan holding company (a "multiple
holding company"). The activities of a multiple holding company are limited to
those few activities specified in the Home Owners' Loan Act (which include
providing management services for the subsidiary savings association and
conducting an insurance agency) and those activities that the Federal Home Loan
Bank Board (the predecessor to the OTS) (the "FHLBB") by order or by regulation
approved as of March 5, 1987. The FHLBB approved a number of permissible
activities (e.g., data processing services, real estate development and the
underwriting of credit life insurance), although these activities are generally
not significantly broader than otherwise permissible service corporation
activities for a federally chartered savings association.
In addition, a multiple holding company may engage in activities
approved by the Federal Reserve Board for bank holding companies as being
"closely related to banking" (e.g., mortgage banking, leasing, data processing
and discount securities brokerage), unless the OTS imposes limits on any such
activity. The only method by which activities of multiple holding companies may
be expanded is if the Federal Reserve Board expands the activities permitted for
bank holding companies. Further, the activities of a multiple holding company
will be limited to those of a bank holding company if any subsidiary savings
association does not qualify as a QTL. See "- Qualified Thrift Lender Test."
Within one year of such event, the Company would be required to register as, and
would be subject to all restrictions applicable to, a bank holding company.
Management believes that the limits imposed on multiple holding companies
described above will not have a material adverse affect on the Company's
operations.
The Company must obtain approval from the OTS before acquiring control
of any other SAIF-insured institution. Such acquisitions are generally
prohibited if they result in a multiple savings and loan holding company
controlling savings institutions in more than one state. However, such
interstate acquisitions are permitted based on specific state authorization or
in a supervisory acquisition of a failing savings institution.
Federal Securities Law
The stock of the Company is registered with the SEC under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Accordingly,
the Company is subject to the information, proxy solicitation, insider trading
restrictions and other requirements of the SEC under the Exchange Act.
Company stock held by persons who are affiliates (generally officers,
directors and principal stockholders) of the Company may not be resold without
registration or unless sold in accordance with certain resale restrictions. If
the Company meets specified current public
35
information requirements, each affiliate of the Company is able to sell in the
public market, without registration, a limited number of shares in any
three-month period.
Federal Reserve System
The Federal Reserve Board requires all depository institutions to
maintain non-interest bearing reserves at specified levels against their
transaction accounts (primarily checking, NOW and Super NOW checking accounts).
At December 31, 1996, the Banks were in compliance with these reserve
requirements. The balances maintained to meet the reserve requirements imposed
by the Federal Reserve Board may be used to satisfy liquidity requirements that
may be imposed by the OTS. (See "--Liquidity.")
Savings associations are authorized to borrow from the Federal Reserve
Bank "discount window," but Federal Reserve Board regulations require
associations to exhaust other reasonable alternative sources of funds, including
FHLB borrowings, before borrowing from the Federal Reserve Bank.
Federal Home Loan Bank System
The Banks are members of the FHLB of Cincinnati, which is one of 12
regional FHLBs, that administers the home financing credit function of savings
associations. Each FHLB serves as a reserve or central bank for its members
within its assigned region. It is funded primarily from proceeds derived from
the sale of consolidated obligations of the FHLB System. It makes loans to
members (i.e., advances) in accordance with policies and procedures established
by the board of directors of the FHLB, which are subject to the oversight of the
Federal Housing Finance Board. All advances from the FHLB are required to be
fully secured by sufficient collateral as determined by the FHLB. In addition,
all long-term advances are required to provide funds for residential home
financing.
As a member, the Banks are required to purchase and maintain stock in
the FHLB of Cincinnati. At December 31, 1996, Springfield, Mayflower and Seven
Hills had $4.6 million. $.7 million and $.5 million, respectively, in FHLB
stock, which was in compliance with this requirement. In past years, the Banks
have received substantial dividends on its FHLB stock. Over the past five
calendar years such dividends have averaged 5.5% and were 7.0% for 1996.
Under federal law the FHLBs are required to provide funds for the
resolution of troubled savings associations and to contribute to low- and
moderately priced housing programs through direct loans or interest subsidies on
advances targeted for community investment and low- and moderate-income housing
projects. These contributions have affected adversely the level of FHLB
dividends paid and could continue to do so in the future. These contributions
could also have an adverse effect on the value of FHLB stock in the future. A
reduction in value of the Banks' FHLB stock may result in a corresponding
reduction in the Banks' capital.
For the year ended December 31, 1996, dividends paid by the FHLB of
Cincinnati to the Bank totaled $294,000, which constituted a $202,000 increase
over the amount of dividends received in 1995.
36
Federal and State Taxation
Savings associations that meet certain definitional tests relating to
the composition of assets and other conditions prescribed by the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), had been permitted to establish
reserves for bad debts and to make annual additions thereto which may, within
specified formula limits, be taken as a deduction in computing taxable income
for federal income tax purposes. The amount of the bad debt reserve deduction
for "non-qualifying loans" is computed under the experience method. The amount
of the bad debt reserve deduction for "qualifying real property loans"
(generally loans secured by improved real estate) may be computed under either
the experience method or the percentage of taxable income method (based on an
annual election).
Under the experience method, the bad debt reserve deduction is an
amount determined under a formula based generally upon the bad debts actually
sustained by the savings association over a period of years.
The percentage of specially computed taxable income that is used to
compute a savings association's bad debt reserve deduction under the percentage
of taxable income method (the "percentage bad debt deduction") is 8%. The
percentage bad debt deduction thus computed is reduced by the amount permitted
as a deduction for non-qualifying loans under the experience method. The
availability of the percentage of taxable income method permits qualifying
savings associations to be taxed at a lower effective federal income tax rate
than that applicable to corporations generally (approximately 31.3% assuming the
maximum percentage bad debt deduction).
If an association's specified assets (generally, loans secured by
residential real estate or deposits, educational loans, cash and certain
government obligations) constitute less than 60% of its total assets, the
association may not deduct any addition to a bad debt reserve and generally must
include existing reserves in income over a four year period.
Under the percentage of taxable income method, the percentage bad debt
deduction cannot exceed the amount necessary to increase the balance in the
reserve for "qualifying real property loans" to an amount equal to 6% of such
loans outstanding at the end of the taxable year or the greater of (i) the
amount deductible under the experience method or (ii) the amount which when
added to the bad debt deduction for "non-qualifying loans" equals the amount by
which 12% of the amount comprising savings accounts at year-end exceeds the sum
of surplus, undivided profits and reserves at the beginning of the year. At
December 31, 1996, the 6% and 12% limitations restricted the percentage bad debt
deduction available to the Banks.
In August 1996, legislation was enacted that repeals the reserve method
of accounting (including the percentage of taxable income method) used by many
thrifts, including the Banks, to calculate their bad debt reserve for federal
income tax purposes. As a result, large thrifts such as the Bank must recapture
that portion of the reserve that exceeds the amount that could have been taken
under the specific charge-off method for post-1987 tax years. The legislation
also requires thrifts to account for bad debts for federal income tax purposes
on the same basis as commercial banks for tax years beginning after December 31,
1995. The recapture will occur over a six-year period, the commencement of which
will be delayed until the first taxable year
37
beginning after December 31, 1997, provided the institution meets certain
residential lending requirements. The management of the Company does not believe
that the legislation will have a material impact on the Company or the Banks.
In addition to the regular income tax, corporations, including savings
associations such as the Banks, generally are subject to a minimum tax. An
alternative minimum tax is imposed at a minimum tax rate of 20% on alternative
minimum taxable income, which is the sum of a corporation's regular taxable
income (with certain adjustments) and tax preference items, less any available
exemption. The alternative minimum tax is imposed to the extent it exceeds the
corporation's regular income tax and net operating losses can offset no more
than 90% of alternative minimum taxable income. For taxable years beginning
after 1986 and before 1996, corporations, including savings associations such as
the Banks, are also subject to an environmental tax equal to 0.12% of the excess
of alternative minimum taxable income for the taxable year (determined without
regard to net operating losses and the deduction for the environmental tax) over
$2 million.
To the extent earnings appropriated to a savings association's bad debt
reserves for "qualifying real property loans" and deducted for federal income
tax purposes exceed the allowable amount of such reserves computed under the
experience method and to the extent of the institution's supplemental reserves
for losses on loans ("Excess"), such Excess may not, without adverse tax
consequences, be utilized for the payment of cash dividends or other
distributions to a shareholder (including distributions on redemption,
dissolution or liquidation) or for any other purpose (except to absorb bad debt
losses). As of December 31, 1996, Springfield's, Mayflower's and Seven Hills'
Excess for tax purposes totaled approximately $6.2 million, $1.2 million and
$1.3 million, respectively.
The Company files consolidated federal income tax returns with the
Banks and its subsidiaries. Savings institutions, such as the Banks, that file
federal income tax returns as part of a consolidated group are required by
applicable Treasury regulations to reduce their taxable income for purposes of
computing the percentage bad debt deduction for losses attributable to
activities of the non-savings institution members of the consolidated group that
are functionally related to the activities of the savings institution member.
The Company has not been audited by the IRS during the last five years.
Ohio Taxation. The Banks are subject to an Ohio franchise tax based on
their net worth plus certain reserve amounts. Total net worth for this purpose
is reduced by certain exempted assets. The resultant net taxable value of stock
is taxed at a rate of 1.5% for 1996.
Ohio companies in a consolidated group, including the Company, are
subject to an Ohio franchise tax based on the greater of the tax on net worth or
the tax on net income, subject to various adjustments and varying rates. Local
taxes on property and income will also be imposed in certain jurisdictions.
Delaware Taxation. As a Delaware holding company, the Company is
exempted from Delaware corporate income tax but is required to file an annual
report with and pay an annual
38
fee to the State of Delaware. The Company is also subject to an annual franchise
tax imposed by the State of Delaware.
Executive Officers
The executive officers of the Company are elected annually and hold
office until their respective successors have been elected and qualified or
until death, resignation or removal by the Board of Directors. Each executive
officer of the Company is also an executive officer of the Bank. There are no
arrangements or understandings between the persons named and any other person
pursuant to which such officers were selected.
Name Age Positions Held with the Company
---- --- -------------------------------
John T. Heckman 45 Interim President and Chief Executive Officer
Philip W. Christman 54 Executive Vice President, Mortgage Lending
Thomas A. Estep 46 Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Jerry R. Mills 53 Vice President - Operations
The business experience of each executive officer of the Company is set
forth below.
John T. Heckman. Mr. Heckman was named Interim President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company and Springfield in January 1997. He was
Executive Vice President, Financial Operations of the Company and Springfield,
positions he had held since April 1995. Mr. Heckman had responsibility for all
operational areas of banking activity other than mortgage lending. From 1987 to
April 1995, Mr. Heckman served as an Assistant Director at the Office of Thrift
Supervision.
Philip W. Christman. Mr. Christman is Executive Vice President,
Mortgage Lending of the Company and Springfield, positions he has held since
April 1995. As such, he is responsible for all mortgage origination and
collection activities. Mr. Christman joined the Bank in November 1994.
Immediately prior to joining the Bank he was employed as Mortgage Loan
Origination Director at Amerifirst Bank, Xenia, Ohio. Prior to such time, Mr.
Christman was an Account Executive at Norwest Mortgage Incorporated, Cincinnati,
Ohio.
Thomas A. Estep. Mr. Estep is Vice President, Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company and Springfield. He was appointed as Treasurer
in 1984 and as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in 1993. Mr. Estep is
responsible for all data processing, accounting and investing functions.
Jerry R. Mills. Mr. Mills is the Vice President - Operations of the
Company and Springfield. He joined the Bank in August 1993. As Vice President -
Operations, he directly
39
oversees the loan department and branch operations. From 1987 to 1993, he was
branch administrator and office manager of National City Bank, Springfield,
Ohio.
Employees
At December 31, 1996, the Company and its subsidiary had a total of 112
employees, including three part-time employees. The Company's employees are not
represented by any collective bargaining group. Management considers its
employee relations to be good.
Item 2. Properties
The Company conducts its business at its main office, executive office
and the Bank's four branch offices located in its market area. The following
table sets forth information relating to each of the Company's offices as of
December 31, 1996.
40
Total
Approximate Net Book
Date Square Value at
Location Acquired Footage December 31, 1996
- -------- -------- ------- -----------------
(In Thousands)
Main Office:
28 E. Main Street 1900 5,721 $1,019
Springfield, Ohio
Branch Offices:
7601 Dayton Springfield Road 1983 2,528 79
Enon, Ohio
210 N. Main Street 1987 2,369 381
New Carlisle, Ohio
1480 Upper Valley Pike 1950 3,777 439
Springfield, Ohio
50 Kahoe Lane 1993 2,369 443
Yellow Springs, Ohio
3216 Seajay Drive 1996 1,925 342
Beavercreek, Ohio
8370 Colerain Avenue 1996 4,800 473
Cincinnati, Ohio
1440 Main Street 1996 3,800 295
Cincinnati, Ohio
4860 Hunt Road Leased 1,008 ---
Cincinnati, Ohio
6570 Gracely Drive 1996 1,200 199
Cincinnati, Ohio
The Company owns all but one of its offices. The total net book value
of the Company's premises and equipment (including land, building and leasehold
improvements and furniture, fixtures and equipment) at December 31, 1996 was
$4.0 million. See Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in
the Annual Report to Stockholders filed as Exhibit 13 hereto.
The Company conducts its data processing through a service bureau. The
net book value of the data processing and computer equipment utilized by the
Company at December 31, 1996 was approximately $107,000.
41
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
The Company and each of its subsidiaries are involved from time to time
as plaintiff or defendant in various legal actions arising in the normal course
of their businesses. While the ultimate outcome of pending proceedings cannot be
predicted with certainty, it is the opinion of management, after consultation
with counsel representing the Company, the Bank or its subsidiary in the
proceedings, that the resolution of these proceedings should not have a material
effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matter was submitted to a vote of security holders, through the
solicitation of proxies or otherwise, during the quarter ended December 31,
1996.
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Stock and Related
Security Holder Matters
Page 8 of the Company's 1996 Annual Report to Stockholders is herein
incorporated by reference.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
Pages 9 and 10 of the Company's 1996 Annual Report to Stockholders is
herein incorporated by reference.
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
Pages 11 through 23 of the Company's 1996 Annual Report to Stockholders
are herein incorporated by reference.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Pages 25 through 57 of the Company's 1996 Annual Report to Stockholders
are herein incorporated by reference.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on
Accounting and Financial Disclosure
There has been no Current Report on Form 8-K filed reporting a change
of accountants and/or reporting disagreements on any matter of accounting
principle or financial statement disclosure.
42
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
Information concerning Directors of the Company is incorporated herein
by reference from the Company's definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders scheduled to be held on April 16, 1997 (except for
information contained under the headings "Compensation Committee Report on
Executive Compensation" and "Stock Performance Presentation"), a copy of which
will be filed not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year. For
information concerning executive officers of the Company who are not also
Directors, see "Executive Officers" in Part I of this Annual Report on Form
10-K.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Information concerning executive compensation is incorporated herein by
reference from the Company's definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting
of Stockholders scheduled to be held on April 16, 1997 (except for information
contained under the headings "Compensation Committee Report on Executive
Compensation" and "Stock Performance Presentation"), a copy of which will be
filed not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management
Information concerning security ownership of certain beneficial owners
and management is incorporated herein by reference from the Company's definitive
Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders scheduled to be held on
April 16, 1997 (except for information contained under the headings
"Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation" and "Stock Performance
Presentation"), a copy of which will be filed not later than 120 days after the
close of the fiscal year.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Information concerning certain relationships and transactions is
incorporated herein by reference from the Company's definitive Proxy Statement
for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders scheduled to be held on April 16, 1997
(except for information contained under the headings "Compensation Committee
Report on Executive Compensation" and "Stock Performance Presentation"), a copy
of which will be filed not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal
year.
43
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on
Form 8-K
(a) (1) Financial Statements:
The following information appearing in the Company's Annual Report to
Stockholders for the year ended December 31, 1996, is incorporated by reference
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K as Exhibit 13.
Pages in
Annual
Annual Report Section Report
--------------------- ------
Consolidated Balance Sheets at
December 31, 1996 and 1995.......................................................................... 25
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended
December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994.................................................................... 26 - 27
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity
for the Years Ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994................................................ 28 - 29
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for Years Ended
December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994.................................................................... 30 - 31
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements............................................................ 32 - 57
Independent Auditors' Report.......................................................................... 24
(a) (2) Financial Statement Schedules:
All financial statement schedules have been omitted as the information
is not required under the related instructions or is inapplicable.
44
(a) (3) Exhibits:
Reference to Prior
Regulation Filing or Exhibit
S-K Exhibit Number Attached
Number Document Hereto
- ----------- -------- ------------------
2 Plan of acquisition, reorganization, None
arrangement, liquidation or
succession
3 (i) Certificate of Incorporation *
3 (ii) Bylaws *
4 Instruments defining the rights of *
security holders, including
indentures
9 Voting trust agreement None
10 Material contracts:
(a) 1995 Stock Option and **
Incentive Plan
(b) Management Recognition Plan **
(c) Employment Agreement with **
C. William Clark
(d) Employment Agreement with **
Jerry R. Mills
(e) Employment Agreement with **
Thomas A. Estep
(f) Employment Agreement with ***
Philip W. Christman
(g) Employment Agreement with ***
John T. Heckman
11 Statement re computation of per None
share earnings
12 Statements re computation of ratios None
13 Annual report to security holders 13
16 Letter re change in certifying None
accountant
18 Letter re change in accounting None
principles
45
Reference to Prior
Regulation Filing or Exhibit
S-K Exhibit Number Attached
Number Document Hereto
- ----------- ------------------------------------- ------------------
21 Subsidiaries of the registrant 21
22 Published report regarding matters None
submitted to vote of security holders
23 Consents of experts and counsel 23
24 Power of attorney None
27 Financial data schedule 27
99 Additional exhibits None
- ----------
* Incorporated by reference to the Company's Registration Statement
No. 33-76734.
** Incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1994.
*** Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 1995.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K:
On November 14, 1996, the Company filed a current report on Form 8-K
reporting the acquisition of Seven Hills. No other reports on Form 8-K were
filed during the quarter ended December 31, 1996.
46
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
WESTERN OHIO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Date: March 31, 1997 By: /s/John T. Heckman
-----------------------------------------------------
John T. Heckman, Interim President and Chief
Executive Officer
(Duly Authorized Representative)
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed
below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By: /s/John T. Heckman By: /s/David L. Dillahunt
-------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------
John T. Heckman, Interim President and David L. Dillahunt, Chairman of
Chief Executive Officer the Board
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: March 31, 1997 Date: March 31, 1997
By: /s/Howard V. Dodds By: /s/John E. Field
-------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------
Howard V. Dodds, Director John E. Field, Director
Date: March 31, 1997 Date: March 31, 1997
By: /s/Carl. E. Mumma By: /s/William N. Scarff
-------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------
Carl. E. Mumma, Director William N. Scarff, Director
Date: March 31, 1997 Date: March 31, 1997
By: By:
/s/Jeffrey L. Levine /s/Thomas A. Estep
-------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------
Jeffrey L. Levine, Director Thomas A. Estep, Vice President, Treasurer
and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Date: March 31, 1997 Date: March 31, 1997