Back to GetFilings.com
Being Filed Pursuant to Rule 901 (d) of Regulation S-T
================================================================================
FORM 10-Q
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
(X) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002
---------------
OR
( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
For the period from to
--------------- -------------------------------
Commission File Number
001-14135
----------------------
OMI CORPORATION
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Marshall Islands 52-2098714
--------------------------------- -------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
One Station Place, Stamford, CT 06902
--------------------------------- --------------------------
(Address of principal (Zip Code)
executive offices)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code (203) 602-6700
-----------------
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X No
----- -----
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of
common stock, as of August 13, 2002 :
----------------
Common Stock, par value $0.50 per share 70,279,164 shares
OMI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION Page
----
Item 1. Financial Statements
Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations (unaudited) for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2002 and 2001 3
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets-
June 30, 2002 (unaudited) and December 31, 2001 4
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in
Stockholders' Equity (unaudited) for the six months
ended June 30, 2002 5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)
for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 6
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (unaudited) 7
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations 16
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risks 37
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION 39
SIGNATURES 40
2
OMI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
(UNAUDITED)
FOR THE THREE FOR THE SIX
MONTHS ENDED MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, June 30,
2002 2001 2002 2001
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Revenues ............................. $ 48,189 $ 55,835 $ 92,535 $ 115,880
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Operating Expenses:
Voyage ............................ 8,101 7,070 16,112 13,673
Vessel ............................ 13,515 9,901 27,231 18,578
Charter hire ...................... 4,294 1,888 7,922 4,551
Depreciation and amortization ..... 10,492 7,597 20,640 14,821
General and administrative ........ 3,293 3,137 6,579 5,845
(Gain) loss on disposal/write down
of vessels-net .................. -- (18,069) 289 (19,509)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total operating expenses ........ 39,695 11,524 78,773 37,959
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Operating Income ..................... 8,494 44,311 13,762 77,921
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Other (Expense) Income:
Loss/write down on investments-net (650) (500) (547) (500)
Interest expense .................. (6,244) (4,890) (11,733) (11,223)
Interest income ................... 232 667 420 1,283
Other-net ......................... -- 42 -- 322
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Net Other Expense ............... (6,662) (4,681) (11,860) (10,118)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Income before income taxes and
equity in operations of joint
ventures .......................... 1,832 39,630 1,902 67,803
Income tax benefit ................... -- -- 307 --
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Income before equity in operations
of joint ventures ................. 1,832 39,630 2,209 67,803
Equity in operations of joint ventures -- 15 -- 220
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Net Income ........................... $ 1,832 $ 39,645 $ 2,209 $ 68,023
========= ========= ========= =========
Basic Earnings Per Share ............. $ 0.03 $ 0.59 $ 0.03 $ 1.05
Diluted Earnings Per Share ........... $ 0.03 $ 0.58 $ 0.03 $ 1.04
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:
Basic ........................... 70,279 67,287 70,264 64,749
Diluted ......................... 70,508 67,831 70,475 65,249
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
OMI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS)
JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31,
2002 2001
-------- --------
(UNAUDITED)
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash, including cash equivalents:
2002-$31,057; 2001-$15,168 ................. $ 34,482 $ 17,730
Marketable securities ........................ -- 6,218
Receivables:
Traffic receivables, net of allowance for
doubtful accounts of $2,033 in 2002 and
$1,622 in 2001 ........................... 14,179 14,052
Other ...................................... 2,450 1,549
Current notes receivable ..................... -- 6,775
Current restricted cash ...................... 1,000 13,120
Prepaid expenses and other current assets .... 4,523 5,316
-------- --------
Total Current Assets ....................... 56,634 64,760
-------- --------
Vessels and other property, at cost ............. 857,224 781,895
Construction in progress ........................ 65,134 84,736
-------- --------
Total vessels and other property ............. 922,358 866,631
Less accumulated depreciation ................... 89,191 76,865
-------- --------
Vessels and other property-net ......... 833,167 789,766
-------- --------
Drydock costs ................................... 5,255 5,743
Non-current restricted cash ..................... 3,500 4,000
Other assets and deferred charges ............... 10,577 11,358
-------- --------
Total Assets ........................... $909,133 $875,627
======== ========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable ............................. $ 6,828 $ 8,842
Accrued liabilities:
Deferred charter hire revenue .............. 7,503 5,981
Voyage and vessel .......................... 5,043 4,590
Interest ................................... 3,671 3,731
Other ...................................... 4,564 5,859
Deferred gain on sale of vessels ............. 1,557 971
Current portion of long-term debt ............ 45,788 40,238
-------- --------
Total Current Liabilities .............. 74,954 70,212
-------- --------
Long-term debt ............................... 415,588 392,316
Other liabilities ............................ 6,998 7,441
Deferred gain on sale of vessels ............. 7,423 3,842
Stockholders' equity ......................... 404,170 401,816
-------- --------
Total Liabilities & Stockholders' Equity $909,133 $875,627
======== ========
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
4
OMI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002
(IN THOUSANDS)
(UNAUDITED)
Unearned Accumulated
Compensation Other Total Comprehensive
Common Stock Capital Retained Restricted Comprehensive Stockholders' Income
Shares Amount Surplus Earnings Stock Income Equity (Loss)
------ ------- -------- -------- ------------ ------------- ------------ -------------
Balance at January 1, 2002 70,248 $35,124 $303,117 $ 72,463 $ (4,611) $ (4,277) $ 401,816
Comprehensive income:
Net income 2,209 2,209 $ 2,209
Unrealized gain on securities-net 39 39 39
Reclassification adjustment for
gains realized in net income (43) (43) (43)
Other comprehensive income (398) (398) (398)
--------
Comprehensive income $ 1,807
========
Issuance of common stock 11 6 27 33
Issuance of restricted stock 20 10 70 (80) --
Amortization of restricted stock 514 514
------ ------- -------- -------- --------- -------- ----------
Balance at June 30, 2002 70,279 $35,140 $303,214 $ 74,672 $ (4,177) $ (4,679) $ 404,170
====== ======= ======== ======== ========= ======== ==========
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
5
OMI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS)
(UNAUDITED)
FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30,
2002 2001
--------- ---------
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED (USED) BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income .............................................. $ 2,209 $ 68,023
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization ..................... 20,640 14,821
Amortization of lease reserve ..................... -- (231)
Amortization of deferred gain on sale of vessels .. (524) (788)
Amortization of deferred compensation ............. -- 72
Amortization of restricted stock .................. 514 --
Loss (gain) on disposal/write down of vessels-net . 289 (19,509)
Loss/write down on disposal of investments-net .... 547 500
Decrease in deferred income taxes ................. (307) --
Equity in operations of joint ventures-
net of dividends received ....................... -- 2,113
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Decrease in receivables and other current assets 923 13,091
Decrease (increase) in other assets and
deferred charges .............................. 1,999 (345)
(Decrease)increase in accounts payable and
accrued liabilities ........................... (1,823) 377
Increase in other liabilities ................... -- 179
Other ........................................... 106 (922)
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities ............... 24,573 77,381
--------- ---------
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED (USED) BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Additions to vessels and other property ............... (116,573) (160,025)
Proceeds from disposition of vessels and other property 58,009 77,282
Payments for drydocking ............................... (1,200) (2,438)
Investment in joint ventures-net ...................... -- 1,076
Proceeds from notes receivable ........................ 6,737 1,187
Proceeds from (payments for) investments-net .......... 6,129 (533)
Escrow of funds ....................................... 11,500 (1,000)
--------- ---------
Net cash used by investing activities ................... (35,398) (84,451)
--------- ---------
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED (USED) BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from issuance of debt ........................ 125,929 77,000
Payments on debt ...................................... (97,107) (57,984)
Payments for debt issue costs ......................... (1,245) (536)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock-net ............ -- (985)
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by financing activities ............. 27,577 17,495
--------- ---------
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents ............... 16,752 10,425
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year .......... 17,730 35,328
--------- ---------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period .............. $ 34,482 $ 45,753
========= =========
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
OMI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1
The condensed consolidated interim financial statements of OMI Corporation
("OMI" or the "Company") are unaudited and reflect all adjustments (consisting
only of normal recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management,
necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and operating
results for the interim periods. The condensed consolidated financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and
notes thereto contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2001. The results of operations for the six
months ended June 30, 2002, are not necessarily indicative of the results for
the entire fiscal year ending December 31, 2002.
OMI, a bulk shipping company incorporated January 9, 1998 in the Republic
of the Marshall Islands, provides seaborne transportation services primarily of
crude oil and refined petroleum products. The Company is the successor to
Universal Bulk Carriers, Inc., a Liberian corporation, which was a wholly-owned
subsidiary of OMI Corp. ("Old OMI") until June 17, 1998 at which date the
Company was separated from Old OMI (renamed Marine Transport Corporation)
through a tax-free distribution to Old OMI shareholders of one share of the
Company's common stock for each share of Old OMI common stock. The Company
trades under the symbol "OMM" on the New York Stock Exchange.
RECLASSIFICATIONS--Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior
year financial statements to conform to the 2002 presentation. These
reclassifications had no effect on previously reported net income.
NEWLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS--The Financial Accounting Standards Board
"FASB" recently issued four Statements of Financial Accounting Standards
("SFAS"), which are summarized as follows:
SFAS 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" addresses financial
accounting and reporting for goodwill and other intangible assets. SFAS 142
discontinues the practice of amortizing goodwill and indefinite lived intangible
assets and initiates an annual review for impairment. Impairment would be
examined more frequently if certain indicators were encountered. Intangible
assets with a determinable useful life will continue to be amortized over that
period. The amortization provisions shall be applied to fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2001 to all goodwill and intangible assets except that, these
provisions presently apply to goodwill and intangible assets acquired after June
30, 2001. The Company did not have goodwill or intangible assets as of June 30,
2002 and therefore there was no impact on the financial statements.
SFAS 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations" was issued in June
2001. This statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for
obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the
associated asset retirement costs. This Statement is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. The Company
has not yet determined the impact, if any, that the adoption of this statement
will have on the Company's results of operations or financial position.
SFAS 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets"
was issued in October 2001. SFAS 144 replaces FASB Statement 121, "Accounting
for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets
7
to Be Disposed Of." SFAS 144 requires that those long-lived assets be measured
at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell, whether
reported in continuing operations or in discontinued operations. Therefore,
discontinued operations will no longer be measured at net realizable value or
include amounts for operating losses that have not yet occurred.
SFAS 144 also broadens the reporting of discontinued operations to include
all components of an entity with operations that can be distinguished from the
rest of the entity and that will be eliminated from the ongoing operations of
the entity in a disposal transaction. The provisions of SFAS 144 are effective
for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2001 and are to be applied prospectively. The adoption of this statement did not
have any effect on the Company's results of operations or financial position.
During 2002, FASB issued Statement No. 145 ("SFAS 145"), Rescission of FASB
Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical
Corrections. The Statement updates, clarifies and simplifies existing accounting
pronouncements. SFAS 145 rescinds Statement 4, which required all gains and
losses from extinguishment of debt to be aggregated and, if material, classified
as an extraordinary item, net of related income tax effect. As a result, the
criteria in Opinion 30 will now be used to classify those gains and losses.
Statement 64 amended Statement 4, and is no longer necessary because Statement 4
has been rescinded. Statement 44 was issued to establish accounting requirements
for the effects of transition to the provisions of the Motor Carrier Act of
1980. Because the transition has been completed, Statement 44 is no longer
necessary. SFAS 145 amends Statement 13 to require that certain lease
modifications that have economic effects similar to sale-leaseback transactions
be accounted for in the same manner as sale-leaseback transactions. This
Statement also makes technical corrections to existing pronouncements. While
those corrections are not substantive in nature, in some instances, they may
change accounting practices. This Statement is effective for fiscal years
beginning after May 15, 2002. Since this new Statement was issued to clarify and
simplify existing pronouncements there is no effect on the Company's financial
statements.
Derivatives and Hedging Activities--The Financial Accounting Standards
Board issued SFAS 133 as amended, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities", which is effective for fiscal years beginning after June
15, 2000. The Company adopted SFAS 133 effective January 1, 2001.
All derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at their fair value. On
the date the derivative contract is entered into, the Company designates the
derivative as (1) a hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability
or of an unrecognized firm commitment ("fair value" hedge) or (2) a hedge of a
forecasted transaction ("cash flow" hedge). The Company does not have
foreign-currency cash-flow or fair-value hedges ("foreign currency" hedge) or a
hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation.
The Company is exposed to market risk, such as changes in interest rates.
To manage the volatility relating to this exposure, the Company selectively
enters into derivative transactions pursuant to the Company's policies for
hedging practices. Designation is performed on a specific exposure basis to
support hedge accounting. The changes in fair value of these hedging instruments
are offset in part or in whole by corresponding changes in the fair value or
cash flows of the underlying exposures being hedged. The Company does not hold
or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.
8
As of June 30, 2002, the Company has interest rate swaps and Future Rate
Agreements ("FRA's") to effectively convert a portion of its debt from a
floating to a fixed-rate basis. The swaps and FRA's are designated as cash flow
hedges. These swaps and FRA's were completely effective and therefore no
ineffectiveness was recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
NOTE 2 - CREDIT FACILITIES AND LOAN AGREEMENTS
As of June 30, 2002 the Company's debt and credit arrangements consisted of the
following:
(in thousands)
Loans under bank credit agreements at a margin plus
variable rates of the London Interbank Offering
Rate ("LIBOR")(1) (2) .......................... $460,051
7.00% Convertible Note due 2004 ................... 1,325
--------
Total ................................... 461,376
Less current portion of long-term debt .. 45,788
--------
Long-term debt .................................... $415,588
========
(1) Rates at June 30, 2002 ranged from 2.9735 percent to 5.5 percent (including
margins).
(2) OMI has secured interest rate swaps that fix $95,000,000 of variable rate
debt at 4.86% for three years and $60,000,000 at 4.77% for four years (excluding
margins), and $95,289,000 by FRA's with interest rates within a range of 2.355%
to 2.50% (excluding margins) until December 2002.
2002 Financing Transactions
The Company has a term loan agreement, secured by 16 vessels, in the
original amount of $310,000,000 (the "$310 Facility"), which has a balance of
$176,392,000 at June 30, 2002. In March 2002, this Facility was amended to
reduce the three remaining 2002 quarterly payments from $10,000,000 to
$6,250,000 and increase the balloon payment by $11,250,000. In April 2002, the
15 remaining quarterly payments (including the three in 2002) were reduced to
$6,051,000 as a result of the sale of a vessel. The balloon payment due at
maturity in October 2005 is $91,683,000. As a result of the amendment, the
Company's margin on this Facility was increased by 25 basis points. Currently
the Company's interest rate margin is 2.25% over LIBOR.
On March 27, 2002, the Company entered into a $78,000,000 reducing
revolving liquidity facility secured by first mortgages on two vessels and
second mortgages on 17 vessels (one vessel was sold in April 2002). The loan,
which matures on March 27, 2007, bears interest at LIBOR plus a margin of 2.75
percent, and requires semi-annual payments of $3,000,000, with the balance being
payable with the tenth payment. As of June 30, 2002, the line has been reduced
to $73,678,000; the Company had $28,588,000 available under the line.
In November 2001, the Company obtained a seven-year $44,000,000 term loan
to partially finance the purchase of two product carrier newbuildings, one of
which was delivered on December 17, 2001 and the other of which was delivered on
March 26, 2002. The loan is split into two $22,000,000 tranches. At June 30,
2002, the balance of the loan was $42,050,000. Each tranche is to be repaid
three months after drawdown in 28 quarterly installments (the first 12 at
$650,000 and next 16 at $375,000) plus a balloon of $8,200,000 due with the last
installment. The outstanding balance of the loan bears interest at LIBOR plus an
applicable margin. During the first three years of this loan the margin is 1.00
percent as long as the secured vessels remain on time charter. During the
remaining four years, the
9
margin will be based on OMI's ratio of consolidated funded debt to consolidated
EBITDA on a trailing four quarter basis.
Reducing Revolving Facility
On July 27, 2001, OMI entered into a six year $348,000,000 reducing
revolving credit facility (the "$348 Facility"), which was reduced to
$329,000,000 when the Company elected not to exercise its option on a
newbuilding and as of June 30,2002 has been reduced to $299,773,000 due to the
sale of the COLUMBIA (see Note 6). The Facility has been and will be used to
provide up to 65 percent financing of pre-delivery installments and final
payments at delivery on eleven newbuilding vessels, with deliveries scheduled
through 2003, acquisition financing and refinancing of four secondhand vessels
purchased in the first half of 2001 and for general corporate purposes up to the
available amount under the Facility. The Facility includes interest rate margins
based on a pricing ratio grid (currently 2.25% over LIBOR). The Company will pay
an additional margin of 25 basis points up to September 30, 2002, which will
then be reduced to 12.5 basis points from October 1, 2002 to March 31, 2003. The
availability under the Facility reduces quarterly based on a 17-year
amortization schedule from delivery of the vessels until September 2003, and
thereafter $6,539,000 per quarter until July 27, 2007 at which time the entire
Facility is due. At June 30, 2002, the Company had drawn $158,320,000. The
remainder of the Facility becomes available when construction and delivery
payments are made. During the six months ended June 30, 2002 OMI drew an
aggregate of $38,929,000 for the acquisition of two newbuildings delivered in
January and March 2002.
Restrictive Covenants
All loan agreements contain restrictive covenants as to working capital,
net worth, maintenance of specified financial ratios and collateral values. They
restrict the Company's ability to make certain payments, such as dividends and
repurchase of its stock. Pursuant to the loan agreements liens against specific
assets were granted and other liens against those assets were prohibited. As of
June 30, 2002, the Company was in compliance with its covenants.
Interest Rate Swaps
As of June 30, 2002, the Company had two interest rate swap transactions
with notional amounts of $60,000,000 and $95,000,000 in which the Company will
pay fixed-rate interest payments, at 4.77% and 4.86%, respectively, and will
receive floating-rate interest amounts based on three month LIBOR settings (for
a term equal to the swaps' reset periods). These agreements have maturity dates
of October 2004 and October 2005, respectively. These transactions have been
designated as cash flow hedges, and as of June 30, 2002, the Company has
recorded a liability of $4,647,000 and a charge correspondingly to Accumulated
other comprehensive income related to the fair market value of these swaps.
Future Rate Agreements
In February 2002, OMI entered into five FRAs, which match five loan
tranches of the $348 Facility, for an aggregate notional value of $95,289,000.
The FRAs fixed the interest rate before margins on these tranches within a range
of 2.355% to 2.50%. As of June 30, 2002, the Company has recorded a liability of
$32,000 and a charge correspondingly to Accumulated other comprehensive income
representing an adjustment to the fair market value of the FRAs.
10
NOTE 3 - EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
The computation of basic earnings per share is based on the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The computation
of diluted earnings per share assumes the foregoing and the exercise of all
stock options using the treasury stock method and the conversion of the 7%
convertible note due 2004, to the extent dilutive.
The components of the denominator for the calculation of basic and diluted
earnings per share are as follows:
FOR THE THREE MONTHS FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, ENDED JUNE 30,
-------------------- ------------------
(in thousands, except per share 2002 2001 2002 2001
amounts) ------ ------ ------ ------
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Weighted average common shares
outstanding .................. 70,279 67,287 70,264 64,749
====== ====== ====== ======
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Weighted average common shares
outstanding ................ 70,279 67,287 70,264 64,749
Options ...................... 229 544 211 500
7% Convertible notes ......... -- -- -- --
------ ------ ------ ------
Weighted average common shares
Outstanding-diluted ........ 70,508 67,831 70,475 65,249
====== ====== ====== ======
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Net income ................... $ 0.03 $ 0.59 $ 0.03 $ 1.05
====== ====== ====== ======
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Net income ................... $ 0.03 $ 0.58 $ 0.03 $ 1.04
====== ====== ====== ======
The effect of the assumed conversion of the 7% convertible notes due 2004
was not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 because the average price of OMI's
stock was less than the stock conversion price of $7.375.
NOTE 4 - SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
During the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 interest paid totaled
approximately $11,564,000 and $12,483,000, respectively.
During March 2002, OMI issued a total of 11,073 shares at $2.89 to one
director in lieu of his annual fee of $33,000.
NOTE 5 - ACQUISITIONS
During January and March 2002, OMI took delivery of two handymax product
carriers contracted from the same shipyard. Total capitalized costs for both
vessels aggregated approximately $59,651,000. The vessels have been partially
financed by the $348 Facility (see Note 2) and began three-year time charters
upon delivery.
During March 2002, the Company acquired one handysize product carrier.
Total capitalized costs for the vessel aggregated approximately $30,318,000
11
of which $22,000,000 was financed (see Note 2). The vessel began a three-year
time charter upon delivery.
NOTE 6 - DISPOSAL OF VESSELS
In June 2002, the Company exercised its option to reacquire the COLUMBIA
(using approximately $29,000,000 in cash, $12,000,000 of cash in an escrow
account and $3,700,000 from an associated note receivable) and simultaneously
sold the vessel to an unrelated party for $50,000,000. The vessel, renamed
OLIVER JACOB, has been time chartered back for a period of eight years and has
been accounted for as an operating lease. The gain on the sale of approximately
$4,700,000 will be amortized over the charter period.
In February 2002, OMI contracted to sell a 1988 built product carrier for
$9,100,000 and recognized a charge of $302,000 on the income statement
representing the write down to the vessel's net realizable value. The vessel was
delivered to its new owners on April 4, 2002.
NOTE 7 - DISPOSAL AND WRITE DOWN OF INVESTMENTS
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, OMI recorded a net
loss on the disposal/write down of investments aggregating $934,000 and
$850,000, respectively.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, OMI sold marketable
securities and received net proceeds of approximately $6,129,000. The sales
resulted in a net gain of $284,000 for the three months and $303,000 for the six
months ended June 30, 2002.
NOTE 8 - FINANCIAL INFORMATION RELATING TO SEGMENTS
The Company organizes its business principally into two operating segments.
These segments and their respective operations are as follows:
Crude Oil Tanker Fleet - includes vessels that normally carry crude oil and
"dirty" products. The current fleet includes four sizes of vessels; Suezmax,
ULCC, Panamax and handysize.
Product Carrier Fleet - includes vessels that normally carry refined
petroleum products such as gasoline, naphtha and kerosene. This fleet includes
two sizes of vessels; handymax and handysize vessels.
The following is a summary of the operations by major operating segments
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 and June 30, 2001:
FOR THE THREE MONTHS FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, ENDED JUNE 30,
------------------- -------------------
(in thousands) 2002 2001 2002 2001
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total Revenues:
Crude Oil Tanker Fleet ........... $ 21,896 $ 34,361 $ 41,592 $ 78,016
Product Carrier Fleet ............ 26,244 21,324 50,894 37,638
Other ............................ 49 150 49 226
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total .......................... $ 48,189 $ 55,835 $ 92,535 $115,880
======== ======== ======== ========
Time Charter Equivalent Revenues: (1)
Crude Oil Tanker Fleet ........... $ 15,648 $ 30,265 $ 29,378 $ 67,946
Product Carrier Fleet ............ 24,391 18,350 46,996 34,035
Other ............................ -- -- -- --
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total .......................... $ 40,039 $ 48,615 $ 76,374 $101,981
======== ======== ======== ========
12
FOR THE THREE MONTHS FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, ENDED JUNE 30,
-------------------- --------------------
2002 2001 2002 2001
-------- -------- -------- --------
(in thousands)
Income (loss) before income taxes and equity
in operations of joint ventures:
Crude Oil Tanker Fleet...................(2) $ (455) $ 33,761 $ (2,626) $ 57,131
Product Carrier Fleet....................(2) 5,861 8,222 10,915 14,603
General and administrative expense
not allocated to vessels ................. (2,275) (2,080) (4,601) (3,715)
Other ...................................... (1,299) (273) (1,786) (216)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total .................................... $ 1,832 $ 39,630 $ 1,902 $ 67,803
======== ======== ======== ========
(1) The Company uses time charter equivalent revenue, which is voyage revenue
less voyage expenses, as a measure of analyzing fluctuations in voyage
revenue between financial periods and as a method of equating revenue
generated from a voyage charter to time charter.
(2) Operating income includes (Gain) loss on disposal/write down of vessels-net
see below:
FOR THE THREE MONTHS FOR THE SIX MONTHS
JUNE 30, JUNE 30,
--------------------- -------------------
(in thousands) 2002 2001 2002 2001
---------- -------- -------- --------
Crude Oil Tanker Fleet .......................... $ -- $(17,473) $ -- $(18,913)
Product Carrier Fleet ........................... -- (596) 289 (596)
---------- -------- -------- --------
(Gain) loss on disposal/write down of vessels-net $ -- $(18,069) $ 289 $(19,509)
========== ======== ======== ========
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, mortgage debt
of OMI and its related interest expense have been allocated to the above
segments based upon the relative value of the vessels collateralizing the debt.
NOTE 9 - TAX MATTERS
The income tax benefit of $307,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2002
represented the reversal of tax accruals pertaining to certain tax years prior
to the spin off date of June 17, 1998.
During the six months ended June 30, 2002, OMI paid $535,000 of the reserve
for deferred income taxes, which represents the settlement relating to prior tax
years which have been closed.
OMI is a Marshall Islands Corporation (see Note 1). Pursuant to various tax
treaties and the current United States Internal Revenue Code, the Company's
operations prospectively will not be subject to income taxes in the United
States (other than adjustments to previously reported amounts). The remaining
reserve in deferred income taxes at June 30, 2002 was $2,258,000.
NOTE 10 - OTHER COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Contracts to Purchase Vessels
During June 2001, OMI agreed to have constructed two 70,100 deadweight
metric tons ("dwt") product carriers for $36,718,000 each, which are expected to
be delivered in April and July of 2003. At June 30, 2002, approximately
$66,094,000 is scheduled to be paid to the shipyard in the next two years
($11,016,000 in 2002 and $55,078,000 in 2003). In June 2002, OMI committed to
time charter the two Panamax vessels for a period of five years (excluding
options of the charterer to extend the charters) from their delivery dates.
13
During February 2001, OMI agreed to purchase two Suezmax vessels under
construction by another owner for delivery in September and October 2002. The
aggregate contract price is $55,600,000 for each vessel. As of June 30, 2002, an
aggregate of approximately $64,256,000 is scheduled to be paid at the times of
delivery of the vessels.
During 2000 and 2001, OMI contracted to build four 47,000 dwt product
carriers for approximately $116,960,000. Two of the vessels were delivered in
the first quarter of 2002 and the other two are scheduled for delivery in the
first quarter of 2003. All four vessels have three-year time charters upon
delivery and are financed at 65%. At June 30, 2002, approximately $52,857,000
was scheduled to be paid to the shipyard over the next year($11,746,000 in 2002
and $41,111,000 in 2003).
Other
The Company is continuing to cooperate with an investigation by the U.S.
Attorney's office in Newark, New Jersey of an allegation that crew members of
one or more of the Company's vessels had by-passed systems designed to prevent
impermissible discharge of certain wastes into the water and had presented false
statements to the government, and otherwise had obstructed the government's
investigation. As well as being violations of the MARPOL (Maritime Pollution)
Convention and U.S. law, the activities under investigation violate Company
policies and directives. The Company is continuing its review of those policies
and has been implementing additional safeguards. The Company received a subpoena
requesting information with respect to other vessels in its fleet and the
Company is providing the information requested. On May 10, 2002 a former master
and former chief engineer of one of the Company's vessels entered guilty pleas
in U.S. District Court in Newark, New Jersey, to violations of U.S. law
involving false statements to the U.S. Coast Guard during a vessel's port call
in New Jersey on September 10, 2001. At this time, the Company cannot predict
the scope or duration or estimate the cost of this investigation or its outcome.
Accordingly, the Company cannot predict whether any penalties or fines will be
imposed or their materiality. The Company expects that a substantial portion of
the costs relating to this incident will be covered by insurers, who have been
duly notified.
OMI and certain subsidiaries are defendants in various actions arising from
shipping operations. Such actions are covered by insurance or, in the opinion of
management, are of such nature that the ultimate liability, if any, would not
have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial statements.
During July 2002, OMI agreed to charter-in a handymax product carrier at
$13,500 a day beginning in October 2002 for a one year period.
NOTE 11-STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Stock Based Compensation
Options- During the six months ended June 30, 2001, the Company recorded
compensation expense of $72,000 relating to stock options. The 2001 compensation
expense was recorded in general and administrative expense in the statements of
operations. There was no compensation expense related to stock options for the
six months ended June 30, 2002.
Restricted Stock
In April 2002, OMI awarded and issued 20,000 shares of restricted stock to
a new director for a total value at the date of grant of approximately
14
$80,000. Restrictions lapse for 25 percent of the shares at the end of year
three, the next 25 percent at the end of year five, and the remaining 50 percent
of the shares at varying years in accordance with years of service at the
individual's retirement date (if the director remains with the Company for at
least five years from the date of grant).
15
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND
FINANCIAL CONDITION
The following presentation of management's discussion and analysis of OMI
Corporation ("OMI" or the "Company") financial condition and results of
operations should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated
financial statements and accompanying notes appearing elsewhere in this Form
10-Q.
The information in this Management Discussion and Analysis and elsewhere in
this document contains certain forward-looking statements, which reflect the
current view of the Company with respect to future events and financial
performance. Wherever used, the words "believes," "estimates," "expects,"
"plan," "anticipates" and similar expressions identify forward-looking
statements. Any such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and
uncertainties that could cause the actual results of the Company's results of
operations to differ materially from historical results or current expectations.
The Company does not publicly update its forward-looking statements even if
experience or future changes make it clear that any projected results expressed
or implied therein will not be realized.
GENERAL
Overview
OMI is one of the largest publicly-traded providers of energy
transportation services in the world. Our ships carry crude oil and refined
petroleum products in international markets for major oil companies and
commodity traders. The Company is the successor to Universal Bulk Carriers,
Inc., a Liberian corporation, which was a wholly-owned subsidiary of OMI Corp.
("Old OMI") until June 17, 1998 at which date the Company was separated from Old
OMI (renamed Marine Transport Corporation) through a tax-free distribution to
Old OMI shareholders of one share of the Company's common stock for each share
of Old OMI common stock. The Company trades under the symbol "OMM" on the New
York Stock Exchange.
In the past few years we have expanded and modernized our fleet by taking
delivery of newly constructed vessels and acquiring new vessels that have time
charters or vessels that have similar characteristics of the fleet. We have also
made a concentrated effort to increase the number handysize and handymax type
vessels on time charters. As of June 30, 2002, 654,061 deadweight metric tons
("dwt") or 28 percent of the Company's fleet were committed to time charters. In
both the three and the six months ended June 30, 2002, time charter revenue
accounted for 57 percent of Time Charter Equivalent ("TCE") revenue.
Consolidated TCE revenue of $76.4 million for the six months ended June 30,
2002 comprises time charter revenue ("TC revenue") and voyage revenue less
voyage expenses from vessels operating in the spot market. For the six months
ended June 30, 2002, TCE revenue comprised $43.5 million generated by time
charters ($37.7 million by the Clean Fleet; $5.8 million by the Crude Oil Fleet)
and $32.9 million generated by voyage charters ($23.6 million by the Crude Oil
Fleet; $9.3 million by the Clean Fleet).
OMI had anticipated the possibility of difficult tanker markets such as we
are currently experiencing, so in 2000 and 2001, when the markets were stronger,
we secured long-term contracts at very attractive yields. This year we will have
approximately $86.0 million of revenue from long-term
16
contracts, approximately double the amount we had in 2001(see Outlook section).
OMI's net income was $1.8 million or $0.03 basic and diluted earnings per
share ("EPS") for the second quarter 2002 compared to net income of $39.6
million or $0.59 basic and $0.58 diluted EPS for the second quarter 2001. For
the six months ended June 30, 2002, net income was $2.2 million or $0.03 basic
and diluted EPS compared to net income of $68.0 million or $1.05 basic and $1.04
diluted EPS for the six months ended June 30, 2001.
Business Strategy
OMI's strategy is to operate a major international crude oil and petroleum
products transportation company with a quality management team to achieve the
following Company goals:
Improved Financial Strength-OMI has positioned itself so that its financial
strength and financial flexibility are at their strongest in the Company's
history.
Upside Earnings Potential- Through our crude oil fleet, we have the ability to
capture upside earnings in strong tanker markets with vessels operating in the
spot market balanced with steady cash flow from its product carrier fleet
operating on time charters.
Predictable Revenue and Earnings Stream- OMI's product carrier fleet is mostly
operating under multi-year time charter contracts, providing for predictable
revenue through industry cycles, most importantly in down markets. Five time
charter agreements have profit sharing arrangements which provide potential for
upside earnings during strong markets.
Expansion and Modernization of Tanker Fleet-OMI has one of the youngest tanker
fleets in the world with a current average age of approximately 7 years compared
to the industry average age of 12 years. The acquisition of modern tonnage is a
continuing program based on current commitments and opportunities that arise in
the market place.
OUTLOOK
The Company anticipates the results in 2002 to be lower than the comparable
2001 periods, however, in the fourth quarter of 2002, the world economy is
projected to grow, and as a result the demand for oil should increase. The
increase in demand for oil and related products should increase the TCE rates as
long as the scrappings of the older vessels are at least equivalent.
The fleet renewal program will continue as we take delivery of two Suezmax
newbuildings in the third and fourth quarters of 2002 and four new buildings,
two handymax and two Panamax vessels, that are scheduled for delivery from the
shipyards in 2003. The two handymax vessels will begin three-year time charters
and the two Panamax vessels will begin five year time charters upon delivery.
When appropriate, we may also look to make other strategic vessel acquisitions.
The delivery and potential acquisitions of vessels may be funded by operating
cash, issuance of stock, debt financing, and proceeds from the disposal of
vessels.
Time Charter Revenue and Drydock
As a hedge against weaker rates, OMI's strategy has been to fix its product
carriers on attractive long-term contracts. Our long-term contracts average over
three years in length and provide:
17
>> Revenue stream that is predictable and visible for several years
>> Lower risk
>> Consistent earnings growth
Five of our seventeen long-term contracts have profit sharing (long-term
contracts that have a floor rate and profit sharing with the customer when
tanker rates exceed a certain price with no cap). These profit sharing
arrangements enable us to take advantage of any upturn in the market.
During the second quarter 2002, 53 percent of the total fleet's operating
days or an aggregate of 654,061 dwt of our 2,301,716 dwt fleet were committed on
time charters. Although currently 17 vessels of OMI's 33 vessel fleet operate on
time charters, the majority of the Company's tonnage operates in the spot
market, giving the Company the ability to take advantage of any increase in
rates while protecting its downside. OMI's business strategy blends long-term
contract revenue at attractive rates with the ability to capture earnings
upswing in a rising spot market with its Suezmax tanker fleet, certain of its
product carriers, Panamaxes, ULCC and from profit sharing arrangements for five
of the product carriers on time charter. The contracted time charter revenue
scheduled below does not include any estimated profit sharing in the future
periods for the five vessels eligible for profit sharing. However, profit
sharing of $2.2 million earned by two vessels in 2002 is included. Projected
requirements for offhire relating to drydock are also included. No assumptions
are made that any expiring time charters will be extended.
The following reflects OMI's contracted TC revenue through 2004.
[CONTRACTED TIME CHARTER REVENUE CHART]
(In millions) 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
TC Revenue .......... $16.3 $43.5 $85.8 $99.3 $92.0
Number of Vessels (1) 5 14 17 20(2) 11(3)
(1) Number of vessels at the end of each year.
(2) During 2003, one time charter terminates and four newbuildings to be
delivered begin time charters.
(3) Twenty vessels operate on time charters during 2004; nine vessels complete
time charter contracts during the year.
18
TC revenue is the amount contracted to date and does not include projections
other than for expected delivery dates of newbuildings and offhire relating to
drydock.
We do not foresee any unusual increase in costs for the fleet in 2002. The
vessel costs in future years may be higher than in past years because some of
the newer vessels are approaching their first drydocks and/or special surveys
and will incur costs associated with periodic routine maintenance. OMI currently
estimates approximately 206 offhire days and $5.0 million in capital
expenditures for drydocks and/or special surveys for the second half of 2002 for
two handysize crude carriers on long-term time charters, one Suezmax vessel, one
Panamax vessel and five product carriers, two of which are on long-term time
charters. Some drydockings may be rescheduled to 2003.
OMI's Fleet
OMI's fleet currently comprises 33 vessels aggregating 2.3 million dwt,
consisting of six Suezmaxes (including two chartered-in), three Panamax tankers
carrying crude oil, 21 handysize and handymax product carriers, two handysize
crude oil tankers and one ultra large crude carrier ("ULCC") as follows:
Number
of Vessels dwt
---------- -----------------
CRUDE OIL FLEET:
1998-2001 built Suezmax vessels ...... 4 157,000 - 160,000
1999-2000 Suezmax vessels chartered-in 2 157,000
1993 built crude tankers ............. 2 36,000
1980's built Panamax vessels ......... 3 66,000
1986 built ULCC ...................... 1 322,000
-------
Total .......................... 12
-------
PRODUCT CARRIER ("CLEAN") FLEET:
2000-2002 built handymax product ..... 4 47,000
1999-2002 built handysize product .... 10 35,000 - 37,000
1984-1991 built handysize product .... 7 29,000 - 35,000
-------
Total .......................... 21
-------
Our objective is to operate a high quality, well-maintained, modern fleet
of vessels concentrated in the crude oil and product carrier markets. Large
fleets of uniform-sized and younger vessels offer many advantages to customers,
and enable the Company to maintain lower operating costs. In recent years we
have sought to modernize and increase the size of our fleet. While some vessels
were ordered directly from the shipyard, we also purchased rights from other
shipowners to obtain vessels upon delivery from shipyards. By doing so, we
obtained earlier access to the vessels than we would have if we ordered them
from the shipyards, and increased the size of our fleet without increasing the
supply of tonnage. Two Suezmax vessels (to be delivered later in 2002) that are
under construction and one handysize product carrier (delivered March 2002) were
acquired from other owners in 2001.
The following tables reflect the changes in the composition of OMI's fleet
from January 2001 to August 2002 and are reflected in operating results for the
periods reported. There were 16 acquisitions, which makes up 48 percent of the
current fleet, and six dispositions contributing to a net increase of 1,683
operating days-net (1,556 day increase in the Clean Fleet and 127 day increase
in the Crude Fleet) for the six months ended June 30, 2002 compared to the same
period in 2001 (see Breakdown by Fleet). During
19
the second quarter 2002, there were 851 more operating days-net due to
acquisitions/disposals, (752 day increase in the Clean Fleet and 99 day increase
in the Crude Fleet).
DATE CHARTER
ACQUIRED DELIVERED TYPE TYPE
- -------- --------- --------- -------
SOMJIN ......... JAN. 2001 Suezmax SPOT
RACER .......... FEB. 2001 Handysize SPOT
RAIN ........... MAR. 2001 Handysize SPOT
RADIANCE ....... MAR. 2001 Handysize SPOT
RHONE .......... APR. 2001 Handysize T/C
BANDAR AYU (1) . JUN. 2001 Handysize T/C
TANDJUNG AYU (1) JUN. 2001 Handysize T/C
MARNE .......... SEPT. 2001 Handysize T/C
MADISON ........ SEPT. 2001 Handysize T/C
CHARENTE ....... SEPT. 2001 Handysize T/C
TRINITY ........ OCT. 2001 Handysize T/C
ASHLEY ......... NOV. 2001 Handysize T/C
OHIO ........... DEC. 2001 Handysize T/C
AMAZON ......... JAN. 2002 Handymax T/C
SAN JACINTO .... MAR. 2002 Handymax T/C
ORONTES ........ MAR. 2002 Handysize T/C
COLUMBIA (4) ... JUN. 2002 Suezmax SPOT
DISPOSALS DATE TYPE
- --------- --------- ---------
HARRIET (2) JAN. 2001 Suezmax
ALTA (2) MAR. 2001 Suezmax
RADIANCE MAY 2001 Handysize
LOIRE JUN. 2001 Suezmax
SOYANG (3) DEC. 2001 Suezmax
LIMAR APR. 2002 Handysize
COLUMBIA (4) JUN. 2002 Suezmax
(1) Handysize vessel carrying crude oil.
(2) Vessel chartered-in, redelivered early to owners.
(3) Vessel was chartered back in a sale leaseback transaction and was renamed
the MAX JACOB.
(4) The COLUMBIA, a previously chartered-in vessel, was acquired and
simultaneously sold during June 2002. The vessel, renamed OLIVER JACOB, has been
time chartered back by the Company for eight years and has been accounted for as
an operating lease.
OMI has the following vessels under construction:
Delivery Approx. Charter
To Be Named Type of Vessel Date dwt Expiration
- ----------- -------------- ---------- ------- ----------
DAKOTA Suezmax SEPT. 2002 159,000 Spot
DELAWARE Suezmax OCT. 2002 159,000 Spot
MOSELLE Handymax FEB. 2003 47,000 2/2006
ROSETTA Handymax MAR. 2003 47,000 3/2006
OTTAWA Panamax APR. 2003 70,100 4/2008
TAMAR Panamax JULY 2003 70,100 7/2008
-------
Total 552,200
=======
RECENT ACTIVITIES
During 2002, the Company entered into the following transactions to improve
its financial position and strengthen its balance sheet:
(1) During July 2002, OMI agreed to charter-in a handymax product carrier
beginning in October 2002 for a one year period.
(2) In June 2002, the Company exercised its option to reacquire the COLUMBIA
(using approximately $29.0 million in cash, $12.0 million of cash in an
20
escrow account and $3.7 million of proceeds from an associated note
receivable) and simultaneously sold the vessel to an unrelated party for
$50.0 million. The vessel, renamed OLIVER JACOB, has been time chartered
back for a period of eight years and has been accounted for as an operating
lease. The gain on the sale of approximately $4.7 million will be amortized
over the charter period. The Company used $20.0 million of the sales
proceeds to pay down a line of credit.
(3) On April 4, 2002, OMI sold a 1988 built product carrier for $9.1 million
and paid down related debt of $6.0 million.
(4) In June 2002, OMI agreed to time charter two Panamax vessels to a major oil
company for a period of five years (excluding options of the charterer to
extend the charters) from their delivery dates. The vessels are scheduled
to be delivered in April and July 2003.
(5) In March 2002, the Company entered into a $78.0 million reducing revolving
liquidity facility secured by first mortgages on two vessels and second
mortgages of vessels under another Facility. As of June 30, 2002, the line
was reduced to $73.3 million and the Company had $28.6 million available
under the line.
(6) In March 2002, OMI's term loan agreement (in the original amount of $310.0
million) was amended to reduce the three remaining 2002 quarterly payments
from $10.0 million to $6.25 million and increase the balloon payment by
$11.25 million. In April 2002, the 15 remaining quarterly payments
(including the three in 2002) were reduced to $6.1 million as a result of
the sale of a vessel. The balloon payment due at maturity in October 2005
is $91.7 million.
(7) In January and March 2002, OMI took delivery of three 2002 built product
carriers (two 47,000 dwt and one 37,000 dwt). Each vessel began a three
year time charter upon delivery.
MARKET OVERVIEW
Rates in the second quarter 2002 declined for both the crude oil fleet and
for the product carrier fleet in comparison to the second quarter 2001, however,
remained stable compared to the first quarter 2002.
Tanker charter rates are determined in a highly competitive market. Our TCE
revenues have fluctuated and will continue to fluctuate based upon a variety of
factors such as:
>> changes in supply of and demand for tanker capacity
>> volume of crude oil and petroleum products transported and distance which
it is carried
>> changes in world economic conditions affecting demand for oil
>> orderbook, fleet age and government regulations and scappings affecting
supply of tankers
>> changes in behavior of tanker users
>> operating efficiency of fleet (utilization).
Although it is expected that the global oil market will improve in the
second half of the year, the determining factor will be the growth in oil demand
and OPEC's response to the growth in oil demand. If the anticipated growth in
oil demand meets current expectations, then an increase in output will be needed
to maintain a balance that will not upset oil prices, tanker rates and asset
values, and consequently, the demand for tankers should increase.
21
SUEZMAX TANKER OVERVIEW
The crude tanker market weakness, especially for the large size vessels,
which began about a year ago, continues, and in the second quarter 2002 the
average Suezmax tanker TCEs were about the same as the preceding quarter, but
about half of the TCE rates in the second quarter a year ago. The tanker market
remains weak early in the third quarter as a result of weak international
industrial production and the resulting adverse effect on oil demand, in
addition to seasonal weakness in oil demand, and, as a consequence, low OPEC oil
production, which together with short-haul non-OPEC oil production gains have
resulted in shorter delivery distances and reduced tanker tonne-mile demand,
despite a small decrease of the tanker supply.
OPEC Crude Oil Production and Tanker Earnings
OPEC Crude Oil Production (Million barrels per day)
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
IQ 23.84 23.16 23.97 25.08 24.95 24.44 25.33 26.96 28.20 27.78 26.51 28.33 25.10
IIQ 23.69 22.41 23.58 24.22 24.87 24.40 25.34 26.86 28.13 26.15 27.92 27.08 24.59
IIIQ 22.21 23.63 24.51 24.85 24.74 24.94 25.54 27.28 27.27 26.56 28.68 27.57
IVQ 23.19 24.13 25.38 24.90 25.07 24.96 26.25 27.88 27.33 25.99 29.02 26.45
Daily Tanker Earnings (1) (In thousands)
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
IQ 22.0 27.7 13.7 15.3 12.4 15.2 22.2 24.8 28.4 23.2 27.7 51.6 18.0
IIQ 20.0 25.6 6.9 13.4 12.5 13.6 22.0 24.9 24.0 17.1 37.8 35.6 18.0
IIIQ 14.3 21.0 6.0 13.9 12.3 18.4 20.9 25.6 21.9 14.3 51.6 30.6
IVQ 16.8 16.1 9.6 15.9 15.8 17.3 21.6 27.9 21.6 19.2 63.6 23.8
(1) 140000 DWT West Africa/US Atlantic Coast Voyage for mid-1970s Built Vessels
in 1990, Mid-1980s Built Vessels in the 1991-95 Period and Modem Vessels
Beginning in 1996.
Source: Fearnleys, Oslo. PIRA Energy Group
World oil demand in the second quarter 2002 was substantially below the
preceding quarter level as well as below the same period last year. The world
oil demand is expected to show a year-on-year growth in the third quarter, and
is expected to increase further in the last months of 2002 due to some
improvement in world economic activity and usual seasonal oil demand gains in
the winter. OPEC's oil production is estimated at about 25.2 million barrels per
day ("b/d"), down by 2.1 million b/d compared to the same time last year. More
importantly, the oil output by the long-haul Middle East OPEC producers is
estimated at 17.4 million b/d, down by 1.6 million b/d compared to the same time
a year ago.
OPEC oil production cuts have more than offset world oil demand declines
leaving commercial crude oil stocks at the end of June 2002 in the three major
oil consuming areas - North America, Western Europe and Japan, at the same level
as a year ago and below the average level of the last six years. However, oil
product stocks are marginally above the level of a year ago and about the same
as the average level of the last six years. Oil inventories are expected to fall
by the end of the third quarter 2002 to low historical levels.
22
TANKER ORDERBOOK AND 20+ YEAR OLD AS
PERCENTAGE OF FLEET DWT
PERCENTAGE
----------
VESSELS ON ORDER .......... 23.50%
VESSELS 20+ YEARS OLD ..... 23.50%
Source: Fearnley's, Oslo Note: As at 6/30/02
The world tanker fleet totalled about 276 million dwt at the end of the
second quarter 2002, down by 1.4 million dwt from the end of 2001 level, and
down by 8.1 million dwt or 2.8% below the level prevailing a year ago.
The tanker orderbook for delivery over the next few years stood at 64.8
million dwt, or 23.5% of the existing fleet at the end of June 2002.
Approximately 15.9 million dwt are for delivery in the balance of this year,
30.9 million dwt in 2003, 16.6 million dwt in 2004 and the balance in 2005. The
tanker orderbook includes 58 Suezmaxes of about 9.1 million dwt or 26.4% of the
existing internationally trading Suezmax tanker fleet.
Approximately 64.9 million dwt or 23.5% of the total tanker fleet was 20 or
more years old, including 34 million dwt or 12.3% of the tanker fleet which was
25 or more years old. In addition, 30 and 22 Suezmaxes were 20 or more and 25 or
more years old, respectively.
Tanker sales for scrap and for Floating Production Storage Offloading
conversion continued at a high rate due to low tanker freight rate environment
and through the end of June totaled about 12.9 million dwt. Tanker sales for
scrap are expected to continue given the current low freight rate environment,
high tanker deliveries through 2003 and the age demographics of the tanker fleet
with the new IMO regulations taking effect on January 1, 2003.
PRODUCT TANKER OVERVIEW
The product tanker market fared better than the crude tanker market in the
second quarter 2002, and average TCE for handysize oil product carriers in the
Caribbean improved compared to the previous quarter. However, TCEs at about
$13,000/day were well below those prevailing in the second quarter last year.
The average TCE improvement was the result of high gasoline imports in the U.S.
to meet strong gasoline demand, as well as a small growth in the product tanker
supply in the second quarter and so far in 2002. The TCE has fallen somewhat
early in the current quarter.
The world product tanker fleet totaled about 48.5 million dwt at the end of
June 2002, up marginally from the year-end 2001 level, and the product tanker
orderbook for delivery over the next few years totaled about 14.3 million dwt,
or 29.6% of the existing product tanker fleet. Approximately 2.6 million dwt are
for delivery in 2002, 6.3 million dwt in 2003, 5.0 million dwt in 2004 and the
balance in 2005. At the same time 12.3 million
23
dwt or 25.4% of the existing fleet was 20 or more years old, including 4.8
million dwt or 9.9% of the existing fleet that was 25 or more years old. It
seems that the product tanker fleet will grow substantially, given the high
orderbook for delivery in the next two years, unless scrappings accelerate.
HANDYSIZE & HANDYMAX ORDERBOOK AND 20+
YEAR OLD AS PERCENTAGE OF FLEET DWT
PERCENTAGE
----------
VESSELS ON ORDER ............ 29.40%
VESSELS 20+ YEARS OLD ....... 26.30%
Note: As at 6/30/02
Source: SSY Consultancy and Research Ltd., London
The expected improvement of world economic activity and the corresponding
increase in demand for oil and oil transportation in the fourth quarter of 2002
bodes well for the tanker market. However, given the high tanker orderbook for
delivery in the balance of 2002 and next year, the level of tanker rates will
depend on the level of oil demand growth and tanker scrappings.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of operations include operating activities of the Company's
vessels. The following discussion explains our operating results in terms of
both Operating income (excluding (Gain) loss on disposal/write down of
vessels-net and General and administrative expenses)and TCE revenues. Operating
expenses included in operating income include charter hire expense. Consistent
with industry practice, we use TCE revenue (voyage revenue less voyage expenses)
or TCE rate calculations as a measure of analyzing fluctuations in voyage
revenue between financial periods and as a method of equating revenue generated
from a voyage charter to time charter revenue.
Under a voyage charter, the owner of a vessel agrees to provide the vessel
for the transport of specific goods between specific ports in return for the
payment of an agreed upon freight per ton of cargo or, alternatively, for a
specified total amount. All operating costs are for the owner's account. A
single voyage charter is often referred to as a "spot market" charter. Vessels
in the spot market may also spend time idle or laid up as they await business.
A time charter involves the placing of a vessel at the charterer's disposal
for a set period of time during which the charterer may use the vessel in return
for the payment by the charterer of a specified daily or
24
monthly hire rate. In time charters, operating costs such as for crews,
maintenance and insurance are typically paid by the owner of the vessel and
voyage costs such as fuel and port charges are paid by the charterer.
Under a bareboat charter, the charterer takes possession of the vessel in
return for a specified amount payable daily or monthly to the owner of the
vessel. The bareboat charterer must provide its own crew, pay all operating and
voyage expenses and is responsible for the operation and management of the
vessel.
Voyage, time and bareboat charters are available for varying periods,
ranging from a single trip to a long-term arrangement approximating the useful
life of the ship to commercial firms (such as oil companies) and governmental
agencies (both foreign and domestic) on a worldwide basis. In general, a
long-term charter assures the vessel owner of a consistent stream of revenue.
Operating the vessel in the spot market affords the owner greater speculative
opportunity, which may result in high rates when ships are in high demand or low
rates (possibly insufficient to cover costs) when ship availability exceeds
demand. Ship charter rates are affected by world economics, international
events, weather conditions, strikes, governmental policies, supply and demand,
and many other factors beyond the control of OMI (see Market Overview section).
OMI has been securing vessels on long-term time charter contracts (see
Outlook section). Currently, 17 of OMI's 33 vessels are performing on time
charters greater than one year. This represents 53 percent of the operating days
of the fleet during the second quarter 2002. The crude oil fleet, however,
operates primarily in the spot market, with the exception of two crude oil
carriers acquired in June 2001 with time charters. In the discussion that
follows, total operating days are net of offhire days, which are any days that
the vessel is not generating revenue due to drydock, special surveys, repairs or
initial positioning of the vessel. Vessel expenses included in operating income
discussed above include operating expenses such as crew wages and other related
costs, stores, routine maintenance and repairs, insurance and miscellaneous.
These expenses are a function of the fleet size, utilization levels for certain
expenses, requirements under laws, and by charterer and Company standards.
Insurance expense varies with overall insurance market conditions as well
as the insured's loss record, level of insurance and desired coverage. OMI
locked in rates for most of its hull and machinery coverage (i.e. asset
insurance), and protection and indemnity coverage (liability insurance provided
by "P&I Clubs") with multi-year contracts in 2001, which also cover the new
vessels that OMI has on order. In addition, some P&I Clubs, which are mutual
indemnity providers, assessed their members additional amounts for several past
years due to their current financial needs resulting from the current poor
investment markets and an increased level of claims. Certain other insurances,
such as war risk, also increased rates. As a result insurance expense increased
in the 2002 periods compared to 2001.
OPERATING INCOME FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002 VERSUS JUNE
30, 2001
Operating income of $11.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002
decreased by a net $17.6 million from $29.4 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2001. Operating income of $20.6 million for the six months ended June
30, 2002 decreased by a net $43.7 million from $64.3 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2001. Operating income for the three and six months ended June
30, 2002 and 2001 were as follows by market segments in which OMI primarily
operates.
25
FOR THE FOR THE
THREE MONTHS SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, ENDED JUNE 30,
(in millions) 2002 2001 2002 2001
------ ------ ------ ------
VOYAGE AND OTHER REVENUES:
Crude Oil Fleet .................... $ 21.8 $ 34.3 $ 41.5 $ 78.0
Product Carrier Fleet .............. 26.3 21.3 50.9 37.7
Other Revenue ...................... 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2
------ ------ ------ ------
Total .............................. $ 48.2 $ 55.8 $ 92.5 $115.9
====== ====== ====== ======
VOYAGE EXPENSES:
Crude Oil Fleet .................... $ 6.2 $ 4.0 $ 12.2 $ 10.1
Product Carrier Fleet .............. 1.9 3.0 3.9 3.6
------ ------ ------ ------
Total .............................. $ 8.1 $ 7.0 $ 16.1 $ 13.7
====== ====== ====== ======
TCE REVENUES:
Crude Oil Fleet .................... $ 15.6 $ 30.3 $ 29.3 $ 67.9
Product Carrier Fleet .............. 24.4 18.3 47.0 34.1
------ ------ ------ ------
Total .............................. $ 40.0 $ 48.6 $ 76.3 $102.0
====== ====== ====== ======
VESSEL EXPENSES (INCLUDING CHARTER HIRE):
Crude Oil Fleet .................... $ 9.2 $ 7.0 $ 18.5 $ 14.5
Product Carrier Fleet .............. 8.7 4.9 16.8 8.8
All Other .......................... (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.2)
------ ------ ------- ------
Total ................................. $ 17.8 $ 11.8 $ 35.2 $ 23.1
====== ====== ====== ======
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION:
Crude Oil Fleet .................... $ 4.6 $ 4.1 $ 9.0 $ 8.3
Product Carrier Fleet .............. 5.8 3.4 11.4 6.4
All Other .......................... 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1
------ ------ ------ ------
Total .............................. $ 10.5 $ 7.6 $ 20.6 $ 14.8
====== ====== ====== ======
OPERATING INCOME: (1)
Crude Oil Fleet .................... $ 1.8 $ 19.2 $ 1.8 $ 45.1
Product Carrier Fleet .............. 9.9 10.0 18.8 18.9
All Other .......................... 0.1 0.2 -- 0.3
------ ------ ------ ------
Total .............................. $ 11.8 $ 29.4 $ 20.6 $ 64.3
====== ====== ====== ======
(1) Operating Income excludes (Gain) loss on disposal/write down of vessels-net
and General and administrative expenses.
Net changes are discussed as follows according to the two market segments (crude
oil fleet and product carrier or "Clean" fleet) in which OMI primarily operates.
CRUDE OIL TANKER FLEET
Operating income decreased $17.4 million for the three months and $43.3
million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 compared to the same periods in
2001.
26
CRUDE OIL FLEET:
Breakdown by Fleet
In thousands, except daily rates FOR THE THREE FOR THE SIX
& expenses, number of vessels and MONTHS ENDED MONTHS ENDED
operating days JUNE 30, JUNE 30,
(Unaudited) 2002 2001 2002 2001
- --------------------------------------------- -------- -------- -------- --------
SUEZMAXES:
TCE Revenue .............................. $ 9,665 $ 21,163 $ 17,671 $ 47,580
-------- -------- -------- --------
Operating Expenses ....................... 2,125 2,490 4,515 5,394
Charter Hire Expense ..................... 4,294 1,888 7,922 4,551
Depreciation ............................. 2,131 2,897 4,263 5,917
-------- -------- -------- --------
Operating Income ......................... $ 1,115 $ 13,888 $ 971 $ 31,718
======== ======== ======== ========
Average Daily TCE (Spot) ................. $ 17,833 $ 37,426 $ 16,330 $ 37,924
Average Daily TCE (Time Charter Out) ..... -- $ 18,191 -- $ 17,121
Average daily operating expense .......... $ 4,917 $ 4,010 $ 5,119 $ 4,396
Number of vessels owned-end of
period (1), (2) ........................ 4 5 4 5
Number of vessels chartered-in end of
period (2), (3) ........................ 2 1 2 1
Number of operating days (Spot) .......... 542 516 1,082 1,111
Number of operating days(Time Charter Out) -- 91 -- 189
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ULCC:
TCE Revenue .............................. $ (165) $ 2,004 $ (453) $ 5,535
-------- -------- -------- --------
Operating Expenses ....................... 406 1,103 1,184 1,591
Depreciation ............................. 526 316 999 631
-------- -------- -------- --------
Operating (Loss)Income ................... $ (1,097) $ 585 $ (2,636) $ 3,313
======== ======== ======== ========
Average Daily TCE ........................ $ (1,814) $ 46,615 $ (2,504) $ 41,618
Average daily operating expense .......... $ 4,462 $ 12,121 $ 6,541 $ 8,790
Number of vessels owned-end of period .... 1 1 1 1
Number of operating days ................. 91 41 181 133
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PANAMAXES:
TCE Revenue .............................. $ 3,197 $ 6,698 $ 6,321 $ 14,435
-------- -------- -------- --------
Operating Expenses ....................... 1,723 1,418 3,622 2,915
Depreciation ............................. 1,255 808 2,429 1,617
-------- -------- -------- --------
Operating Income ......................... $ 219 $ 4,472 $ 270 $ 9,903
======== ======== ======== ========
Average Daily TCE ........................ $ 12,997 $ 24,536 $ 12,250 $ 26,585
Average daily operating expense .......... 6,311 5,194 6,670 5,368
Number of vessels owned-end of period .... 3 3 3 3
Number of operating days ................. 246 273 516 543
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OTHER CRUDE:
TCE Revenue .............................. $ 2,948 $ 372 $ 5,830 $ 372
-------- -------- -------- --------
Operating Expenses ....................... 641 85 1,195 85
Depreciation ............................. 714 107 1,427 107
-------- -------- -------- --------
Operating Income ......................... $ 1,593 $ 180 $ 3,208 $ 180
======== ======== ======== ========
Average daily TCE ........................ $ 16,200 $ 16,574 $ 16,106 $ 16,564
Average daily operating expense .......... $ 3,522 $ 3,864 $ 3,301 $ 3,864
Number of vessels owned-end of period (4) 2 2 2 2
Number of operating days ................. 182 22 362 22
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL CRUDE FLEET OPERATING
INCOME ................................... $ 1,830 $ 19,125 $ 1,813 $ 45,114
======== ======== ======== ========
27
Note: Number of operating days (includes waiting days)but is reduced only for
the days the vessels are in drydock.
(1) In June 2001, a Suezmax vessel was sold. During January 2001, a Suezmax
newbuilding was delivered.
(2) In December 2001, a vessel was sold and leased back.
(3) In January and March 2001, OMI redelivered two chartered-in vessels.
(4) In June 2001, two handysize crude oil tankers were acquired with time
charters.
Fluctuations in each of the crude oil fleet vessel types were as follows:
Suezmaxes: Operating income decreased by $12.8 million for the three months
and $30.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 compared to the three
and six months ended June 30, 2001. TCE revenue decreased by $11.5 million
during the three months and $29.9 million during the six months ended June 30,
2002 primarily from:
(1) a decline in charter rates (see Market Overview) for the Suezmax
tanker fleet coupled with waiting/slow steaming days,
(2) a decrease in TCE revenue due to the sale of a Suezmax vessel in June
2001 ( resulting in 61 fewer operating days during the three months
and 151 fewer days during the six month periods in 2002) and
(3) a decline in earnings in 2002 due to the early termination of two
chartered-in vessels that were redelivered during the first quarter
2001 (resulting in 86 fewer operating days during the six months in
2002).
Charter hire expense increased for two vessels (and depreciation expense
decreased for one vessel) due to the MAX JACOB (formerly SOYANG), which was sold
and chartered back in December 2001 and OLIVER JACOB (formerly COLUMBIA), which
was also sold and then time chartered back to the Company in June 2002.
ULCC: Operating income decreased by $1.7 million for the three months and
$5.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 compared to the three and
six months ended June 30, 2001. TCE revenue decreased by $2.2 million during the
three months and $5.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2002
primarily due to waiting days for a significant part of the three and six month
periods in 2002 and the cancellation of a voyage. Net operating expenses
decreased in both periods during 2002 compared to 2001, primarily for decreased
maintenance and repair and stores expense. Repairs made during the vessel's
drydock in 2001 were expensed. Depreciation expense increased primarily for
amortization of drydock expense (drydock performed July 2001).
Panamaxes: Operating income decreased by $4.3 million for the three months
and $9.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 compared to the three
and six months ended June 30, 2001. TCE revenue decreased by $3.5 million during
the three months and $8.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2002
primarily from a decline in charter rates (see Market Overview) for the fleet
coupled with waiting/slow steaming days and 27 offhire days for one vessel
drydocked in the second quarter 2002. Operating expense increased primarily for
increases in crew expenses in both periods in 2002 compared to 2001 periods.
Depreciation expense increased primarily for amortization of drydock expense for
two vessels drydocked in October and December 2001.
Other Crude: Operating income increased by $1.4 million for the three
months and $3.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 compared to the
three and six months ended June 30, 2001. TCE revenue increased by $2.6 million
during the three months and $5.5 million during the six months ended June 30,
2002 primarily from the two 1993 built crude oil carriers that were delivered in
June 2001 that are continuing on long-term time charters.
28
PRODUCT CARRIER FLEET
Operating income earned by the product carrier fleet decreased a net of
$0.1 million for the three months and $0.1 million for the six months ended June
30, 2002 compared to the same periods in 2001.
CLEAN FLEET:
Breakdown by Fleet
In thousands, except daily rates FOR THE THREE FOR THE SIX
& expenses, number of vessels and MONTHS ENDED MONTHS ENDED
operating days JUNE 30, JUNE 30,
(Unaudited) 2002 2001 2002 2001
- ---------------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------
PRODUCTS-ON-SPOT:
TCE Revenue ................... $ 4,514 $12,556 $ 9,303 $23,394
------- ------- ------- -------
Operating Expenses ............ 2,776 3,480 5,734 6,098
Depreciation .................. 1,470 1,973 3,123 3,853
------- ------- ------- -------
Operating Income .............. $ 268 $ 7,103 $ 446 $13,443
======= ======= ======= =======
Average Daily TCE ............. $ 8,826 $17,602 $ 8,270 $17,575
Average daily operating expense $ 5,084 $ 4,591 $ 4,947 $ 4,435
Number of vessels owned-end of
period (1), (2) ............. 6 8 6 8
Number of operating days ...... 511 716 1,124 1,333
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
PRODUCTS-ON-TIME CHARTER:
TCE Revenue ................... $19,878 $ 5,794 $37,693 $10,641
------- ------- ------- -------
Operating Expenses ............ 5,941 1,437 11,096 2,676
Depreciation .................. 4,306 1,413 8,223 2,535
------- ------- ------- -------
Operating Income .............. $ 9,631 2,944 $18,374 $ 5,430
======= ======= ======= =======
Average Daily TCE (3) ......... $14,563 $13,474 $14,723 $13,470
Average daily operating expense $ 4,352 $ 3,342 $ 4,336 $ 3,823
Number of vessels owned-end of
period (2), (4) ............. 15 5 15 5
Number of operating days ...... 1,365 430 2,559 790
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL CLEAN FLEET OPERATING INCOME $ 9,899 $10,047 $18,820 $18,873
======= ======= ======= =======
Note: Number of operating days (includes waiting days)but is reduced only for
the days the vessels are in drydock.
(1) A vessel was sold in April 2002. A vessel acquired in March 2001 was sold
in May 2001.
(2) A vessel operating on spot during the first quarter 2001 began a time
charter in July 2001.
(3) During 2002, OMI recognized profit sharing of approximately $2.2 million on
two vessels' anniversary dates.
(4) From July to December 2001, seven handysize product carriers were acquired.
In January and March 2002, two handymax product carriers and one handysize
product carrier were acquired.
Fluctuations in each of the product carrier groups were as follows:
Product Carriers-on spot: Operating income decreased by $6.8 million for
the three months and by $13.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002
compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2001. TCE revenue decreased
by $8.0 million during the three months and $14.1 million during the six months
ended June 30, 2002 primarily from the decline in spot rates during the 2002
periods compared to the same period in 2001 (see Market Overview). A vessel
began a two-year time charter in July 2001, and a vessel
29
was sold in April 2002. Operating expense increased primarily for increases in
crew expenses in both periods in 2002 and increased insurance expense for
supplemental calls (see Results of Operations section) compared to 2001 periods.
Product Carriers-on time charter: Operating income increased by $6.7
million for the three months and by $12.9 million for the six months ended June
30, 2002 compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2001. TCE revenue
increased by $14.1 million for the three months and $27.1 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2002 compared to the same periods in 2001. The increases
were attributable primarily to the purchase of seven vessels in 2001 and three
vessels in 2002. Operating expenses and depreciation expense also increased in
the 2002 periods corresponding to the increased number of vessels. Operating
expenses increased primarily for increases in crew expenses in both periods in
2002 compared to 2001 periods. Additionally, operating expenses increased by
legal expenses relating to an investigation with which the company is
cooperating and is explained in the Other Matters section of this report.
OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES
The Company's operating expenses, other than vessel, voyage and charter
hire expenses, consist of depreciation and amortization, general and
administrative ("G&A") expenses and (gain) loss on disposal/write down of
vessels-net. These expenses increased by $21.1 million to $13.8 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2002 and by $26.4 million to $27.5 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2002. The increases were primarily attributable to:
depreciation expense (which increased $2.9 million for the three months and $5.8
million for the six months) and gain on disposal of vessels-net in 2001 of $18.1
million and $19.5 million for the three and six month periods ended,
respectively.
Depreciation and amortization-Depreciation and amortization increased by
$2.9 million during the three months and by $5.8 million during the six months
ended June 30, 2002 compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2001.
The increase was primarily due to the acquisition of sixteen new vessels (seven
of which were acquired at various dates during the first half of 2001, see OMI's
Fleet section), net of the decrease from the disposal of two Suezmax vessels and
one product carrier, in addition to the increase in expense due to amortization
of drydock.
General and administrative--G & A increased $0.2 million for the three
months and $0.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 compared to the
same periods in 2001. The increases were due to additional expenses as a result
of a larger fleet.
(Gain) loss on disposal/write down of vessels-net-The (Gain)loss on
disposal/write down of vessels -net changed by $18.1 million for the three
months (representing the second quarter 2001 gain) and by $19.8 million for the
six months ending June 30,2002 compared to the same periods in 2001. The 2002
loss on disposal of $0.3 million resulted primarily from the loss on disposal of
a 1988 built product carrier, which was sold in April 2002.
The second quarter 2001 gain on disposal of $18.1 million resulted from the
sale of two vessels, a 2000 built Suezmax vessel with a gain of $17.5 million
and gain on the sale of a product carrier (acquired in March 2001) of $0.6
million. Additionally, the 2001 gains of $1.4 million included in the six months
ended June 30, 2001 results of operations resulted from the early termination of
two time charters. The gain from the early termination of one charter was from
the accelerated amortization of the provision for loss on the lease obligation.
The gain on early termination of the second charter
30
resulted from accelerated amortization on the deferred gain on sale of the
vessel.
OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME
Other (expense) income consists of loss/ write down on investments -net,
interest expense, interest income and other-net. Net other expense increased by
$2.0 million from $4.7 million during the three months ended June 30, 2001 to
$6.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002. Net other expense
increased by $1.8 million from $10.1 million during the six months ended June
30, 2001 to $11.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, OMI recorded a net
loss on the disposal/write down of investments aggregating $0.9 million in both
periods. The loss was offset in part by a net gain on the disposal of marketable
securities of $0.3 million for the three months and six months ended June 30,
2002. The 2001 loss on disposal/write down of investments of $0.5 million,
related to the winding down of the International Product Carriers Limited joint
venture.
Interest expense during the three and six months ended June 30, 2002
increased by $1.4 million and $0.5 million, respectively, compared to the three
and six months ended June 30, 2001. The average outstanding debt for both
periods in 2002 was higher than the comparable periods in 2001 due to additional
borrowings for acquisitions above that of the repayments from the disposal of
vessels. The net increase was primarily due to interest expense on the financing
for vessel acquisitions, which was offset in part by the decline in interest
rates based on LIBOR (the London Interbank Offering Rate). For the second
quarter 2002, OMI's average interest rate (including margins and amortization of
fees) was 5.164% on the Company's debt compared to 7.7360% during the second
quarter of 2001. For the six months ended June 30, 2002, OMI's average interest
rate (including margins and amortization of fees) was 4.985% on the Company's
debt compared to 6.567% during the comparable period in 2001. Credit facilities
aggregated $461.4 million at June 30, 2002, for which interest on $155.0 million
has been fixed by interest rate swap transactions and $95.3 million by FRA's
(Future Rate Agreements). Interest rate swap transactions fixed interest rates
at 4.77% for $95.0 million and 4.86% for $60.0 million (excluding margins).
FRA's partially fixed rates in 2002 with interest rates ranging from 2.355% to
2.50% (excluding margins) until December 2002.
Interest income during the three and six months ended June 30, 2002
decreased by $0.4 million and $0.9 million, respectively, compared to the three
and six months ended June 30, 2001. The decrease was primarily due to average
lower rates on cash equivalents and lower Notes receivable balances in 2002.
Other-net of $0.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001, primarily
represents insurance settlements of claims on various vessels.
INCOME TAX BENEFIT
The income tax benefit of $0.3 million for the three months ended June 30,
2002 represented the reversal of tax accruals pertaining to certain tax years
prior to the spin off date of June 17, 1998.
During the six months ended June 30, 2002, OMI paid $0.5 million of the
reserve for deferred income taxes, which represents the settlement relating to
prior tax years which have been closed.
31
Pursuant to various tax treaties and the current United States Internal
Revenue Code, the Company's operations prospectively will not be subject to
income taxes in the United States (other than adjustments to previously reported
amounts). The remaining reserve in deferred income taxes at June 30, 2002 was
$2.3 million.
Equity in Operations of Joint Ventures
Equity in operations of joint ventures decreased by $0.2 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2002 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2001.
The 2001 balance was from the winding down of the joint ventures disposed of in
prior years.
Balance Sheet
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, OMI sold marketable
securities and received net proceeds of approximately $6.1 million. The sales
resulted in a net gain of $0.3 million for the three months and six months ended
June 30, 2002.
At June 30, 2002, Accumulated other comprehensive income was reduced by
$0.4 million to reflect the fair value of the swaps at that date to $4.7 million
(see Financing Activities).
During the six months ended June 30, 2002, changes in Vessels and other
property-net were as follows:
>> Vessels and other property increased $75.3 million,
>> Construction in progress decreased a net of $19.6 million and
>> Accumulated depreciation increased a net of $12.3 million from the
balances at December 31, 2001. Depreciation and amortization for the
six months ended June 30, 2002 was $20.6 million (including $1.4
million for amortization of drydock expense).
During January and March 2002, OMI took delivery of two new handymax
product carriers and one handysize product carrier. Vessels increased an
aggregate of $90.0 million for the capitalized costs of the three vessels, $24.5
million of which was reclassified from Construction in progress and $65.5
million cash was paid to the shipyard and related to capitalized costs. The
Company financed an aggregate of $60.9 million of these payments during the six
months ended June 30, 2002 (see Cash Flow section and Financing Activities).
Increases to Vessels and other property were partially offset by the sale
of the product carrier in April 2002, decreasing Vessels by $15.9 million and
Accumulated depreciation decreased by $6.9 million. Additionally, accrued
expenses increased by $0.3 million and a charge was recorded to reflect the loss
on disposal of the vessel of $0.3 million.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash Flows
Cash and cash equivalents of $34.5 million at June 30, 2002 increased $16.8
million from cash and cash equivalents of $17.7 million at December 31, 2001.
The Company's working capital decreased by $12.9 million between June 30, 2002
and December 31, 2001, and is a deficit of $18.3 million at June 30, 2002. The
deficit will be met by the time charter revenue from the new vessels, the $78.0
million liquidity facility entered into on March 27, 2002 and other activities.
Current assets decreased $8.1 million and current liabilities increased $4.7
million. Cash increased primarily because of
32
proceeds from the issuance of debt and the sale of two vessels and marketable
securities, which exceeded the payments to acquire vessels. Decreases in other
current assets were primarily from the return of escrow ($11.0 million) as a
result of the purchase of the COLUMBIA in June 2002. Current liabilities
increased primarily from the increase in the current portion of long-term debt,
which related to the acquisition of vessels. Net cash provided by operating
activities decreased $52.8 million to $24.6 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2002 compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $77.4
million for the six months ended June 30, 2001 (see Results of Operations).
During the six months ended June 30, 2002 the Company took various steps to
improve its liquidity, and as a result ended the quarter with a cash balance of
$34.5 million. The Company has $28.6 million available under a line of credit
and our net debt to net capitalization ratio is 51 percent. The Company's
management believes that cash flow from operations, along with available
borrowing capacity under its credit facilities, will be sufficient to meet
capital requirements.
Cash used by investing activities was $35.4 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2002, compared to cash used by investing activities of $84.5
million for the six months ended June 30, 2001. During 2002, $116.6 million was
used for the additions to vessels ($65.5 million was used for the purchase of
three product carriers and $44.9 million for the purchase of the COLUMBIA for
the six months ended June 30, 2002, $3.0 million was paid vessels under
construction, and the remaining $3.2 million was used for capital expenditures
for improvements to existing vessels and capitalized interest). Cash was used
during the six months ended June 30, 2001 primarily for additions to vessels of
$160.0 million, ($98.5 million in cash used for additions in the crude oil fleet
(one Suezmax delivered and payments for two Suezmax vessels under construction)
and $61.5 million in the product carrier fleet (four product carriers delivered
and construction in progress payments).
During the six months ended June 30, 2002, we sold and leased back a
Suezmax vessel, sold a product carrier, secured additional lines of credit, and
reduced amortization on existing lines giving us flexibility to withstand weak
tanker markets and improve liquidity.
Financing Activities
Cash provided by financing activities was $27.6 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2002, compared to cash provided by financing activities of $17.5
million for the six months ended June 30, 2001. During the six months ended June
30, 2002, there was $97.1 million in principal payments ($21.8 million were
scheduled payments, $49.3 million for two vessels that were refinanced under a
new credit facility in March 2002, $6.0 million for a vessel sold in April 2002,
and $20.0 million paid down on the liquidity facility), and there was $125.9
million in proceeds from the issuance of debt ($60.9 million for the purchase of
three vessels and $65.0 million was drawn down on the new credit facility).
During the six months ended June 30, 2001, we paid $58.0 million in
principal payment of debt, $20.3 million in scheduled principal payments and
$37.7 million upon the sale of a vessel in June 2001. Proceeds of $77.0 million
were received to finance five vessels acquired during the six months ended June
30, 2001.
At June 30, 2002, OMI had $461.4 million in debt outstanding. The following
paragraphs describe changes to the Company's debt facilities during the six
months ended June 30, 2002:
33
The Company has a term loan agreement, secured by 16 vessels, in the
original amount of $310.0 million, which has a balance of $176.4 million at June
30, 2002. In March 2002, this Facility was amended to reduce the three remaining
2002 quarterly payments from $10.0 million to $6.25 million which increased the
balloon payment by $11.25 million. In April 2002, the 15 remaining quarterly
payments (including the three in 2002) were reduced to $6.1 million as a result
of the sale of a vessel. The balloon payment due at maturity in October 2005 is
$91.7 million. As a result of the amendment, the Company's margin on this
facility was increased by 25 basis points. Currently the Company's interest rate
margin is 2.25% over LIBOR.
On March 27, 2002, the Company entered into a $78.0 million reducing
revolving liquidity facility secured by first mortgages on two vessels and
second mortgages on 17 vessels (one vessel was sold in April 2002). The loan,
which matures on March 27, 2007, bears interest at LIBOR plus a margin of 2.75
percent, and requires semi-annual payments of $3.0 million, with the balance
being payable with the tenth payment. In March 2002, $65.0 million was drawn
from this facility, $49.3 million was used to repay the previous mortgages on
two vessels and in June 2002, $20.0 million was repaid upon the sale of two
vessels. As of June 30, 2002, the line has been reduced to $73.6 million; the
Company had $28.6 million available under the line.
In November 2001, the Company obtained a seven-year $44.0 million term loan
to partially finance the purchase of two product carrier newbuildings, one of
which was delivered on December 17, 2001 and the other of which was delivered on
March 26, 2002. The loan is split into two $22.0 million tranches. At June 30,
2002, the balance of the loan was $42.1 million. Each tranche is to be repaid
three months after drawdown in 28 quarterly installments (the first 12 at $0.65
million and next 16 at $0.38 million) plus a balloon of $8.2 million due with
the last installment. The outstanding balance of the loan bears interest at
LIBOR plus an applicable margin. During the first three years of this loan the
margin is 1.00 percent as long as the secured vessels remain on time charter.
During the remaining four years, the margin will be based on OMI's ratio of
consolidated funded debt to consolidated EBITDA on a trailing four quarter
basis.
Reducing Revolving Facility
On July 27, 2001, OMI entered into a six year $348.0 million reducing
revolving credit facility (the "$348 Facility"), which was reduced to $329.0
million when the Company elected not to exercise its option on a newbuilding and
as of June 30,2002 has been reduced to $299.8 million due to the sale of the
COLUMBIA. The Facility has been and will be used to provide up to 65 percent
financing of pre-delivery installments, and final payments at delivery on eleven
newbuilding vessels with deliveries scheduled through 2003, acquisition
financing and refinancing of four secondhand vessels purchased in the first half
of 2001 and for general corporate purposes up to the available amount under the
Facility. The Facility includes interest rate margins based on a pricing ratio
grid (currently 2.25% over LIBOR). The Company will pay an additional margin of
25 basis points up to September 30, 2002, which will then be reduced to 12.5
basis points from October 1, 2002 to March 31, 2003. The availability under the
Facility reduces quarterly based on a 17-year amortization schedule from
delivery of the vessels until September 2003, and thereafter $6.5 million per
quarter until July 27, 2007 at which time the entire Facility is due. At June
30, 2002, the Company had drawn $158.3 million. The remainder of the Facility
becomes available when construction and delivery payments are made. During the
six months ended June 30, 2002 OMI drew an aggregate of $38.9 million for the
acquisition of two newbuildings delivered in January and March 2002.
34
Restrictive Covenants
All loan agreements contain restrictive covenants as to working capital,
net worth, maintenance of specified financial ratios and collateral values. They
restrict the Company's ability to make certain payments, such as dividends and
repurchase of its stock. Pursuant to the loan agreements liens against specific
assets were granted and other liens against those assets were prohibited. As of
June 30, 2002, the Company was in compliance with its covenants.
Interest Rate Swaps
As of June 30, 2002, the Company had two interest rate swap transactions
with notional amounts of $60.0 million and $95.0 million in which the Company
will pay fixed-rate interest payments, at 4.77% and 4.86%, respectively, and
will receive floating-rate interest amounts based on three month LIBOR settings
(for a term equal to the swaps' reset periods). These agreements have maturity
dates of October 2004 and October 2005, respectively. These transactions have
been designated as cash flow hedges, and as of June 30, 2002, the Company has
recorded a liability of $4.6 million and a charge correspondingly to Accumulated
other comprehensive income related to the fair market value of these swaps.
Future Rate Agreements
In February 2002, OMI entered into five Future Rate Agreements ("FRA's"),
which match five loan tranches in the $348 Facility, for an aggregate notional
value of $95.3 million. The FRA's fix the interest rate before margins on these
tranches within a range of 2.355% to 2.50% until December 2002. As of June 30,
2002, the Company has recorded a liability of $32,000 and a charge
correspondingly to Accumulated other comprehensive income representing an
adjustment to the fair market value of the FRAs.
ADJUSTED EBITDA
The Company, its lenders and investors generally consider adjusted EBITDA
to be an appropriate measure of performance. Adjusted EBITDA represents
operating income from operations before depreciation and amortization expense
and (gain)loss on disposal/write down of vessels-net. OMI's computation of
adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to the adjusted EBITDA reported by other
companies. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered an alternative to net income
or other measurements under generally accepted accounting principles. Adjusted
EBITDA of $19.0 million for the three months and $34.7 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2002 was $14.9 million less than the three months and
$38.5 million less than the six months ended June 30, 2001 adjusted EBITDA. The
decreases in both periods were due to the decline in tanker rates, but primarily
due to the decreased rates earned by the Suezmax fleet in 2002 compared to the
same periods in 2001.
OTHER COMMITMENTS
The following are other commitments that have not been previously detailed
in the Recent Activities section.
Contracts to Purchase Vessels
The following are commitments to purchase vessels currently under
construction, related construction payments and the financing arranged (in
millions):
35
Delivery Contract Construction Payments
Vessel Date Price 2002 2003
------ -------- -------- ------ ------
DAKOTA 9/2002 $ 55.6 $ 32.1 n/a
DELAWARE 10/2002 55.6 32.1 n/a
MOSELLE (1) 2/2003 29.2 5.8 $ 20.5
ROSETTA (1) 3/2003 29.5 5.9 20.6
OTTAWA (2) 4/2003 36.7 7.3 25.7
TAMAR (2) 7/2003 36.7 3.7 29.3
------ ------ ------
Total $243.3 $ 86.9 $ 96.1
====== ====== ======
Construction Financing Arranged $ 72.6 $ 62.5
====== ======
(1) This vessel will commence a three-year time charter upon delivery.
(2) This vessel will commence a five-year time charter upon delivery.
Restricted Stock
In April 2002, OMI awarded and issued 20,000 shares of restricted stock to
a new director for a total value at the date of grant of approximately $0.1
million. Restrictions lapse for 25 percent of the shares at the end of year
three, the next 25 percent at the end of year five, and the remaining 50 percent
of the shares at varying years in accordance with years of service at the
individuals' retirement date (if the director remains with the Company for at
least five years from the date of grant).
Other Matters
The Company is continuing to cooperate with an investigation by the U.S.
Attorney's office in Newark, New Jersey of an allegation that crew members of
one or more of the Company's vessels had by-passed systems designed to prevent
impermissible discharge of certain wastes into the water and had presented false
statements to the government, and otherwise had obstructed the government's
investigation. As well as being violations of the MARPOL (Maritime Pollution)
Convention and U.S. law, the activities under investigation violate Company
policies and directives. The Company is continuing its review of those policies
and has been implementing additional safeguards. The Company received a subpoena
requesting information with respect to other vessels in its fleet and the
Company is providing the information requested. On May 10, 2002 a former master
and former chief engineer of one of the Company's vessels entered guilty pleas
in U.S. District Court in Newark, New Jersey, to violations of U.S. law
involving false statements to the U.S. Coast Guard during a vessel's port call
in New Jersey on September 10, 2001. At this time, the Company cannot predict
the scope or duration or estimate the cost of this investigation or its outcome.
Accordingly, the Company cannot predict whether any penalties or fines will be
imposed or their materiality. The Company expects that a substantial portion of
the costs relating to this incident will be covered by insurers, who have been
duly notified.
OMI and certain subsidiaries are defendants in various actions arising from
shipping operations. Such actions are covered by insurance or, in the opinion of
management, are of such nature that the ultimate liability, if any, would not
have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial statements.
During July 2002, OMI agreed to charter-in a handymax product carrier at
$13,500 a day beginning in October 2002 for a one year period.
Effects of Inflation
The Company does not consider inflation to be a significant risk to the
36
cost of doing business in the current or foreseeable future. Inflation has a
moderate impact on operating expenses, drydocking expenses and corporate
overhead.
Newly Issued Accounting Standards
During 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued
Statement No. 145 ("SFAS 145"), Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64,
Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections. The Statement
updates, clarifies and simplifies existing accounting pronouncements. SFAS 145
rescinds Statement 4, which required all gains and losses from extinguishment of
debt to be aggregated and, if material, classified as an extraordinary item, net
of related income tax effect. As a result, the criteria in Opinion 30 will now
be used to classify those gains and losses. Statement 64 amended Statement 4,
and is no longer necessary because Statement 4 has been rescinded. Statement 44
was issued to establish accounting requirements for the effects of transition to
the provisions of the Motor Carrier Act of 1980. Because the transition has been
completed, Statement 44 is no longer necessary. SFAS 145 amends Statement 13 to
require that certain lease modifications that have economic effects similar to
sale-leaseback transactions be accounted for in the same manner as
sale-leaseback transactions. This Statement also makes technical corrections to
existing pronouncements. While those corrections are not substantive in nature,
in some instances, they may change accounting practice. This Statement is
effective for fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002. Since this new
Statement was issued to clarify and simplify existing pronouncements there is no
effect on the Company's financial statements.
SFAS 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations" was issued in June
2001. This statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for
obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the
associated asset retirement costs. This Statement is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. The Company
has not yet determined the impact, if any, that the adoption of this statement
will have on the Company's results of operations or financial position.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks
Market Risk
The Company's major market risk exposure is changing interest rates. The
majority of OMI's debt was floating rate debt at June 30, 2002 and December 31,
2001. At June 30, 2002, the floating rate debt was $460.1 million ($155.0
million of which was fixed with interest-rate swaps and $95.3 million with FRAs)
of the $461.4 million total debt, and at December 31, 2001, the floating rate
debt was $431.0 million ($175.0 million of which was fixed with interest-rate
swaps) of the $432.6 million total debt. Based on the floating rate debt at June
30, 2002, a one-percentage point increase in the floating interest rate would
increase interest expense by $2.1 million per year.
The fixed rate debt on the balance sheet and the fair market value were
$1.3 million as of June 30, 2002, and $1.6 million as of December 31, 2001.
Based on the fixed rate debt at June 30, 2002, if interest rates were to
increase (decrease) by one percent with all other variables remaining constant,
the market value of the fixed rate debt would have an immaterial change.
The Company's policy is to manage interest rate risk through the use of
interest rate derivatives based upon market conditions. OMI uses interest
37
rate swaps and FRAs to manage the impact of interest rate changes on borrowings
under the Company's variable rate credit facilities. The interest rate swaps and
FRAs are entered into with a group of financial institutions with investment
grade credit ratings, thereby minimizing the risk of credit loss. The Company
has entered into certain interest rate derivative transactions with certain
financial institutions to manage the impact of interest rate changes on variable
rate debt. Beginning in October 2001, we had two interest rate swaps for which
the Company will pay fixed-rate interest payments, at 4.77% and 4.86%, and will
receive floating-rate interest amounts based on three month LIBOR settings
covering notional amounts of $60.0 million and $95.0 million, respectively, for
a term equal to the swaps' reset periods. These agreements have maturity dates
of October 2004 and October 2005, respectively. In February 2002, we entered
into five FRAs, which match five loan tranches, respectively, for an aggregate
notional value of $95.3 million. The FRAs fix the interest rate before margins
on these tranches within a range of 2.355% to 2.50% until December 2002.
38
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1 - LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
None.
ITEM 2 - CHANGES IN SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 3 - DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
Item 4 - Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The 2002 annual meeting of stockholders of the Company was held on May 23, 2002.
The following matters were voted upon at the meeting:
(i) Pursuant to OMI's Articles of Incorporation, as amended, and By-Laws, the
Board of Directors of OMI is divided into three classes. The directors in each
class hold office for staggered terms of three years. The three Class I
directors below whose terms expired in 2002 were re-elected for new three year
terms (expiring in 2005) at this Annual Meeting.
Number of Votes For Withheld
------------------- --------
Robert Bugbee 58,862,396 124,549
James N. Hood 58,862,396 124,549
Philip J. Shapiro 58,860,396 126,549
Directors whose terms continue include Messrs. Craig H. Stevenson, Jr., Edward
Spiegel and James D. Woods, Class II directors whose terms expire in 2003 and
Michael Klebanoff and Donald C. Trauscht, Class III directors whose terms expire
in 2004.
(ii) The Board of Directors appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP as auditors of OMI
and various subsidiaries for the year 2002. Deloitte & Touche LLP were ratified
as auditors for 2002.
Number of Votes For Against Withheld
------------------- ------- --------
58,882,431 57,654 46,860
Note: 58,986,945 shares of common stock voted in person/proxy.
ITEM 5 - OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 6 - EXHIBIT AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
a. Exhibits
99.1 OMI Corporation's certifications on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30,2002 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.
b. Reports on Form 8-K
None.
39
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
OMI CORPORATION
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(REGISTRANT)
Date: August 13, 2002 By: /s/ Craig H. Stevenson, Jr.
----------------------------- -----------------------------------
Craig H. Stevenson, Jr.
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
Date: August 13, 2002 By: /s/ Kathleen C. Haines
----------------------------- ----------------------------
Kathleen C. Haines
Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer
40