Back to GetFilings.com






- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

----------------

FORM 10-K

(MARK ONE)
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934 [FEE REQUIRED]

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995

OR

[_] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [NO FEE REQUIRED]

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-14879

CYTOGEN CORPORATION
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)

DELAWARE 22-2322400
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF (I.R.S. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO.)
INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION)

600 COLLEGE ROAD EAST, 08540-5308
CN5308, (ZIP CODE)
PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY
(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)

REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: (609) 987-8200.

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(B) OF THE ACT: NONE

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(G) OF THE ACT:

COMMON STOCK, $.01 PAR VALUE
(TITLE OF CLASS)

WARRANTS TO PURCHASE ONE SHARE OF COMMON STOCK, $.01 PAR VALUE, OF REGISTRANT
(TITLE OF CLASS)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [_] .

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to
the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]

The aggregate market value of the registrant's 40,579,729 shares of Common
Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on February 22, 1996, based on
$7.4375 per share, the last reported sale price on the NASDAQ National Market
on that date, was $301,811,734.

The number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of February 22, 1996 was
46,881,707 shares.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE



FORM 10-K
DOCUMENT PART
-------- ---------

Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement with III
respect to the 1996 Annual Meeting of Stock-
holders (hereinafter referred to as the "Proxy
Statement"), but specifically excluding the
sections titled "Compensation Committee Report
on Executive Compensation" and "Performance
Graph", which shall not be deemed to be incor-
porated by reference herein.


- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------


PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

GENERAL

CYTOGEN Corporation ("CYTOGEN" or the "Company"), a Delaware corporation, is
a biopharmaceutical company engaged in the discovery, development, manufacture
and marketing of products to better diagnose and treat cancer and other
related immunologic diseases. The Company's current portfolio of products
provides the targeted delivery of diagnostic and therapeutic substances
directly to the sites of disease, as well as cellular therapies for the
treatment of cancer and infectious diseases. The Company's business objective
is to use patented and proprietary technologies to develop specific in vivo
cancer diagnostic imaging agents and targeted therapeutic products that
respond to unmet medical needs and can benefit patients with cancer and other
diseases. Its wholly-owned subsidiary, Cellcor, Inc. ("Cellcor"), a Delaware
corporation, is a biotechnology company. As used herein, the term "Company"
may mean CYTOGEN and its wholly-owned subsidiary, taken as a whole, where
appropriate.

Currently, the Company's highest priority products and technology are: (i)
OncoScint(R) CR/OV, CYTOGEN's monoclonal antibody-based diagnostic imaging
agent for colorectal and ovarian cancer, which has been approved by the U.S.
Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") for both single and repeat administration
(see "Cancer Diagnostic Imaging Products--OncoScint CR/OV"); (ii)
ProstaScint(TM), a prostate cancer diagnostic imaging product, for which a
Product License Application ("PLA") was accepted as filed by FDA in March 1995
(see "Cancer Diagnostic Imaging Products--ProstaScint"); (iii) Quadramet(TM),
also referred to by its chemical name, Samarium 153 EDTMP, a cancer therapy
agent for the treatment of bone pain associated with bone metastases, for
which a New Drug Application ("NDA") was accepted as filed by FDA in August
1995 (see "Cancer Therapeutic Products--Quadramet"); (iv) the Genetic
Diversity Library ("GDL") technology involving peptides that have potentially
significant commercial applications in the rapid screening of drug candidates,
in basic drug discovery programs, in in vitro diagnostics, as peptide-based
therapeutics, and in the discovery of synthetic genes or "SynGenes" (see
"Research and Development--Genetic Diversity Library Technology--
TSARs\SynGenes"); and (v) the autolymphocyte therapy ("ALT"), developed by
Cellcor for the treatment of advanced metastatic renal cell carcinoma
("mRCC"), which is in late Phase III development (see "Cancer Therapeutic
Products--ALT Therapy for mRCC").

The Company is continuing to evaluate, invest in and support the sales and
marketing activities with respect to OncoScint CR/OV, as well as the potential
marketing of ProstaScint and other technically-sophisticated tumor imaging
agents. See "Marketing and Sales--OncoScint CR/OV". The Company has also
assigned high priority to the product development and commercialization
programs for ProstaScint, Quadramet and ALT for the treatment of mRCC.

The Company's strategic plan calls for expanding the Company's current
product portfolio through the continued in-licensing of additional products
and related technologies, such as Quadramet, and the acquisition of other
companies with related or complementary products, technologies and/or
services, such as Cellcor. No prediction can be made, however, as to when or
whether CYTOGEN can accomplish this objective or whether accomplishment of the
objective will lead to new commercially-viable products or technologies.

In addition, CYTOGEN has committed additional resources to its GDL
technology, which, as a result of patent filings and development trends, was
previously referred to as the Totally Synthetic Affinity Reagents SynGenes
("TSARs\SynGenes") program. This program involves long peptides that have the
ability to recognize and bind to specific target sites in the human body.
CYTOGEN believes that the ability of these compounds to bind to predetermined
sites may mediate certain diagnostic or therapeutic effects more effectively
than other existing products. CYTOGEN is pursuing corporate alliances and
basic research and development agreements in order to potentially validate and
partially fund the GDL technology programs. While several initial research
alliances were formed in 1995, there can be no assurance that these alliances
will be successful or that

2


CYTOGEN will be successful in establishing such alliances and agreements in
the future. See "Research and Development--Genetic Diversity Library
Technology--TSARs\SynGenes".

The Company neither makes public forecasts regarding the timing or outcome
of FDA-related activities nor makes public predictions regarding the timing of
marketing partnerships. No assurance can be given regarding FDA approval or
the successful establishment of marketing agreements.

CANCER DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING PRODUCTS

Overview. Currently, the cancer diagnostic imaging products consist of
CYTOGEN's monoclonal antibody-based imaging agents for colorectal, ovarian,
prostate, and breast cancers. The Company's imaging products utilize CYTOGEN's
proprietary targeted delivery system, employing whole monoclonal antibodies,
to deliver the diagnostic radioisotope indium-111 to malignant tumor sites.
The imaging products are supplied to hospitals and central radiopharmacies
without the radioisotope. Prior to patient administration, the radioisotope is
attached by the radiopharmacist using a simple liquid transfer procedure
developed by CYTOGEN.

During an imaging procedure, the radiolabeled monoclonal antibody product is
injected into the patient. The antibody travels through the body seeking out
and binding to tumor sites. The radioactivity from the isotope that has been
attached to the antibody can be detected from outside the body by a gamma
camera. The resultant image identifies the existence, location and extent of
disease in the body. Based on clinical studies conducted to date by physicians
on behalf of CYTOGEN, the imaging agents have the potential to provide new and
useful information not available from other diagnostic modalities regarding
the existence, location and extent of the disease (and particularly occult
disease not detected by other methods) throughout the body. CYTOGEN believes
that this information has the potential to impact the way physicians manage
their patients' individual treatments. CYTOGEN also believes that, because its
products use a very low dose of one milligram or less of antibody conjugate
per administration, the products have the additional advantages of low
manufacturing cost and ease of administration.

OncoScint CR/OV. OncoScint CR/OV was approved by FDA in the U.S. in December
1992. This product was approved for single use with other appropriate,
commercially available diagnostic tests, including but not exclusive to
Computerized Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), to locate
malignancies outside the liver in patients with known colorectal or ovarian
cancer. Prior to receipt of FDA approval, CYTOGEN had completed additional
clinical trials which supported repeat administration of the product, and
submitted that data to FDA. In November 1995, FDA approved this expanded
indication allowing for repeat administration of Oncoscint CR/OV. Repeat
administration is an important next step for OncoScint, and may lead to a
modest increase in sales. See "Marketing and Sales--OncoScint CR/OV." With
respect to Europe, this data was also submitted to the Committee for
Proprietary Medicinal Products (the "CPMP"), which had approved OncoScint for
colorectal cancer in 1991. In December 1993, OncoScint CR/OV received CPMP
approval for repeat administration and ovarian cancer indications. Individual
member country approvals are required before marketing under these new
indications can be commenced. OncoScint CR/OV is now approved for sale in
eight Western European countries and four Eastern European countries.

Currently, OncoScint CR/OV is being marketed in the U.S. by CYTOGEN. While
the product has technically performed as predicted in clinical applications,
OncoScint CR/OV has achieved very limited sales, and negligible sales growth,
in both the U.S. and European markets since its introduction. As a result, in
1994, the Company re-evaluated its relationships with its U.S. and European
distributors. CYTOGEN reacquired the U.S. marketing rights ("U.S. Rights") for
the product from Knoll Pharmaceutical Company ("Knoll") in November 1994. See
"Marketing and Sales--Knoll Pharmaceutical". CYTOGEN also reacquired the
European marketing rights for OncoScint CR/OV from Chiron B.V., formerly
EuroCetus B.V., successor in interest to EuroCetus International, N.V.
("Chiron") in February 1995. In December 1995 and January 1996, CYTOGEN signed
agreements with Faulding (Canada) Inc. ("Faulding") and CIS biointernational
("CISbio"), respectively, for the marketing of Oncoscint CR/OV outside the
U.S. See "Marketing and Sales--Faulding" and "CIS biointernational."

3


Because CYTOGEN is the first sponsor to obtain FDA marketing approval for a
monoclonal antibody-based ovarian cancer imaging product that has been
designated as an orphan drug by FDA, CYTOGEN is entitled to certain exclusive
marketing rights with respect to the product. See "Government Regulation and
Product Testing--Orphan Drug Act."

The breast cancer clinical development program, which involves the use of
OncoScint CR/OV to determine whether the cancer has spread to the lymph nodes
(i.e., beyond the primary tumor), was initiated in May 1995 as a result of
positive findings published by the Instituto Nazionale Tumori in Milan, Italy,
and is currently in a Phase II human clinical trial.

ProstaScint. ProstaScint is a monoclonal antibody that is being developed as
a radiolabeled imaging agent to detect the presence and extent of prostate
cancer. The antibody utilized in ProstaScint was exclusively licensed to
CYTOGEN by Dr. Julius Horosziewicz. The product has been studied in three
different indications: presurgical, occult and repeat administration. The
Phase III clinical program for ProstaScint was completed in 1994 and the PLA
was filed by FDA in March 1995. CYTOGEN is pursuing a co-marketing partner for
ProstaScint in the U.S. and is also seeking international marketing alliances
for the product.

CANCER THERAPEUTIC PRODUCTS

Quadramet. Quadramet has been developed as a treatment for the pain
associated with bone metastases, a condition that occurs when cancer
originates in or spreads to the bone. The clinical development program for
Quadramet was completed in the first half of 1995. The Quadramet NDA was filed
by FDA in August 1995.

CYTOGEN entered into an exclusive license agreement for the U.S. rights to
Quadramet from The Dow Chemical Company in March 1993 and assumed
responsibility for the development and commercialization of the product at
that time. See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. In December
1994, CYTOGEN granted to The DuPont Merck Pharmaceutical Company ("DuPont
Merck") an exclusive sub-license with respect to CYTOGEN's rights to
Quadramet. See "Marketing and Sales--Quadramet".

ALT Treatment for mRCC. ALT treatment for mRCC is a proprietary
immunotherapy which uses a patient's own white blood cells to augment his or
her immune system and thereby treat cancer and certain infectious diseases. In
October 1995, patient accrual for the Phase III pivotal clinical trial which
involves 203 patients, was completed. The Company expects that the study will
conclude in the fourth quarter of 1996. If results from the trial are
favorable and FDA concurs, the Company expects to proceed with the submission
of a PLA in the first half of 1997. In September of 1995, FDA approved a
Treatment IND for the ALT treatment of mRCC, which makes ALT available as a
treatment option to patients with mRCC who are not able to participate in ALT
clinical trials. The Treatment IND also allows Cellcor to recover costs
associated with the treatment. Cellcor is also conducting a Phase III human
clinical study in post-surgical patients with non-metastatic kidney cancer
with high risk of recurring disease. This study examines the effect of ALT in
delaying progression to metastatic disease. This study, which was conducted at
13 sites, completed patient accrual in 1995 and the patients are being
followed for survival status. A final analysis of this study is expected to be
available in late 1996. ALT is also in Phase I/II development as a treatment
for hepatitis B. No prediction can be made, however, as to whether or when
such trials will lead to new commercial products. See "Cellcor".

Cellcor is actively pursuing development and marketing collaborations in the
U.S. and Europe. No assurance can be given regarding the timing or success in
developing such collaborations.

Antibody-Based Cancer Therapeutics. CYTOGEN's efforts to develop antibody-
based, cancer therapeutics are currently limited to prostate therapy. This
product utilizes technology similar to the Company's diagnostic products.
However, in the therapeutic product, the substance linked to the antibody is a
radioisotope that destroys tumor cells.


4


The therapeutic radioisotope that CYTOGEN uses, yttrium-90, is chemically
attached to the monoclonal antibody using CYTOGEN's proprietary technology. It
is intended that the therapy product will be supplied to radiopharmacies
without the radioisotope, which will be attached by the radiopharmacist using
a simple procedure developed by CYTOGEN. The prostate therapy product is in a
Phase II trial to determine the product's efficacy in patients with early
evidence of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Development of the
ovarian therapy product, which completed Phase II clinical trials, has been
discontinued due to limited patient response to justify further support of the
product.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

Genetic Diversity Library (GDL) Technology--TSARs\SynGenes. Long-term
research, much of which is preliminary, is being conducted by CYTOGEN on the
GDL technology, formerly referred to as TSARs\SynGenes. The GDL program
consists of research on long peptides that have the potential to take on 3-
dimensional structures. These peptides, which are biologically produced,
create vast, highly diverse compound libraries. Unlike conventional small
molecule drugs or short peptides, long peptides can act like proteins and can
fold to take on very precise biological functions such as specific recognition
units ("RUs"). Depending upon the application, these RUs can act as receptors,
as targeting agents, or ligands for biological receptors. In certain
applications, instead of administering the RU, it is more advantageous to
administer the synthetic gene ("SynGene") which encodes for the RU. Such
SynGene programs are at an early stage of pre-clinical development.
Additionally, CYTOGEN believes its GDL technology can serve as a complementary
and enabling technology to support advances in combinatorial chemistry.
Combinatorial chemistry, which allows for much more rapid synthesis of new
compounds is currently hampered by the lack of equally rapid screening methods
that can begin to characterize each compound's potential therapeutic value.
Currently, CYTOGEN is working, independently and in collaboration with others,
to develop this technology into several potential commercial applications: in
the rapid screening of drug candidates; in basic drug discovery and the
development of peptide therapeutics; in in vitro diagnostics; and in the
discovery of SynGenes.

CYTOGEN is the exclusive licensee of certain patent applications and
technology owned by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill covering
the GDL technology. CYTOGEN has filed patent applications in the U.S. and
certain foreign countries with respect to its GDL technology.

While a significant amount of basic research on the GDL technology has been
done by CYTOGEN, this technology is at an earlier stage of development than
the technology underlying the monoclonal antibody-based products described
above. CYTOGEN is actively pursuing corporate alliances and basic research
agreements to support and advance the GDL technology toward commercialization.
In December 1995, CYTOGEN and Elan Corporation, plc ("Elan") established a
collaborative research and development program to develop orally-administered
products using CYTOGEN's GDL technology and Elan's drug delivery system
technology. See "Limited Field of Use License Agreements--Elan" and Note 3 to
the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Two additional collaborations are also underway: the first, is in support of
in vitro diagnostics and the second involves the pre-clinical evaluation of
certain monoclonal antibodies and corresponding GDL-derived peptides which may
lead to the identification of novel immunotherapies for cancer. No assurances
can be given regarding the success or timing of these or future research and
development programs.

PSM. In 1993, CYTOGEN and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center ("MSKCC")
began a development program involving the prostate specific membrane antigen
("PSM") and CYTOGEN's prostate cancer monoclonal antibody, CYT-351. CYTOGEN
holds an exclusive option for an exclusive license under certain patent
applications and technology held by MSKCC relating to PSM. Additionally,
CYTOGEN is actively seeking license and development agreements to support the
PSM program. However, no assurances can be given regarding the success or
timing of these efforts.

Other Applications. CYTOGEN believes that certain of the technologies it is
developing may have medical applications in various other areas, including
autoimmune disorders and infectious diseases. The

5


Company intends to expand the research and development of these technologies
primarily through strategic alliances with other entities. No predictions can
be made regarding the establishment nor the timing of such alliances. The
Company expects to devote resources to these other areas to the extent funding
is available. No prediction can be made, however, as to when or whether the
areas of research described above will yield new scientific discoveries, or
whether such research will lead to new commercial products.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FUNDING

Research and development expenditures recorded by the Company include
projects conducted by the Company and payments made to sponsored research
programs and consultants. CYTOGEN's expenses for its research and development
activities (including customer sponsored programs) were $22.6 million, $20.3
million and $24.8 million in fiscal years 1995, 1994, and 1993, respectively.
These expenses principally reflect product development efforts and support for
various ongoing clinical trials. Research and development expenditures for
customer sponsored programs, including CytoRad, were $200,000, $29,000 and
$9,112,000 in fiscal years 1995, 1994, and 1993, respectively.

MARKETING AND SALES

OncoScint CR/OV. Promotion of OncoScint CR/OV involves several different
physician audiences, including those who refer patients for imaging procedures
as well as those who obtain and interpret the image. Referring physicians are
likely to be surgeons and oncologists. Imaging physicians are nuclear medicine
specialists and those diagnostic radiologists who have sub-specialty training
in nuclear medicine. After receipt of FDA approval in May 1993 of CYTOGEN's
marketing materials for OncoScint CR/OV, CYTOGEN began its marketing in the
U.S. through its own specialty sales force with an expertise in nuclear
medicine, and through a co-promotion arrangement with Knoll, which agreement
was terminated in 1994. See "Knoll Pharmaceutical". Since May 1994, CYTOGEN
has been the sole marketer of OncoScint CR/OV in the U.S. In 1989, Chiron was
granted exclusive marketing and distribution rights in Europe for OncoScint
CR/OV, which rights were reacquired in 1995 by the Company under the terms of
a disengagement agreement (the "Disengagement Agreement"). See "Chiron B.V."
In December 1995 and January 1996, CYTOGEN signed two marketing agreements for
Oncoscint CR/OV outside of the U.S. with Faulding and CISbio. See "Faulding
(Canada) Inc." and "CIS biointernational."

OncoScint CR/OV is a "technique-dependent" product that requires a high
degree of proficiency in nuclear imaging, as well as a thorough appreciation
of the information the scan can provide. The Company believes that this
information regarding the existence, location and extent of disease has the
potential to impact a physician's ability to make appropriate patient
management decisions. The potential for OncoScint to reduce the number of
unnecessary surgeries and the costs associated with such surgery are seen as
significant benefits in today's cost-conscious "managed health care" settings.

CYTOGEN believes that sales of OncoScint CR/OV may be modestly increased
because of the approval of repeat administration (described below),
implementation of better quality control at the time the image is actually
acquired, and through greater assistance with the interpretation of the scans.
The Company is in the process of establishing a network of qualified nuclear
medicine physicians through its Partners in Excellence, or PIE(TM) Program
(the "PIE Program"). The PIE Program includes rigorous training, testing, and
ongoing quality assurance protocols with active support and certification in
conjunction with the American College of Nuclear Physicians (ACNP). This
program is being further developed in preparation for the launch of the
Company's prostate cancer imaging agent, ProstaScint.

CYTOGEN is also exploring the use of teleradiology to support the PIE
Program in order to allow for improvement of the acquisition and
interpretation of both OncoScint CR/OV and ProstaScint scans. Teleradiology
can provide immediate, two-way communications by linking an imaging center
with an off-site imaging specialist. The use of teleradiology has advanced due
to improvements in related computer and telecommunication technologies.

6


The Company is also exploring whether other companies with comparable
technique-dependent products would like to take advantage of the PIE Program,
which would allow allocation of the marketing and sales costs over a number of
different products. While there has been a great deal of interest in the PIE
Program from other companies, there can be no assurance that CYTOGEN can
attract other products to the PIE Program, that the Company's marketing
strategy will be successful, or that product related revenues will increase
markedly.

In November 1995, CYTOGEN announced that FDA approved the Company's PLA
supplement, expanding the approved indications for OncoScint CR/OV to include
repeat administration of the product. The initial FDA approval received in
December 1992 limited the product to a single administration indication. The
approved supplement extends the prior indication to include readministration
of OncoScint CR/OV to human anti-mouse antibody ("HAMA")-negative patients who
are at risk of recurrence of their cancer. HAMA formation represents an immune
response experienced by some patients when injected with a mouse-derived
antibody that may affect the effectiveness of the product.

Knoll Pharmaceutical. In November 1994, CYTOGEN executed a termination
agreement (the "Termination Agreement") with Knoll. Pursuant to the
Termination Agreement, CYTOGEN has reacquired from Knoll all U.S. Rights to
OncoScint CR/OV, which were previously granted to Knoll pursuant to a License,
Supply and Marketing Agreement dated December 19, 1991 (the "Knoll
Agreement"). See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Under the
terms of the Knoll Agreement, in fiscal years 1994 and 1993, the Company
incurred $412,000 and $5.1 million, respectively, in co-promotion expenses,
and recognized $430,000 and $977,000 in co-promotion revenues. In each of
those fiscal years, the Company also recognized revenues from the supply of
commercial product to Knoll by the Company.

Chiron B.V. On December 30, 1994, CYTOGEN entered into the Disengagement
Agreement with Chiron. Pursuant to a Distribution and License Agreement dated
as of October 21, 1989, as amended, CYTOGEN granted to Chiron exclusive
marketing and distribution rights in Europe (the "European Rights") to
OncoScint CR/OV. Under the Disengagement Agreement, CYTOGEN reacquired the
European Rights and purchased certain business assets relating to the European
Rights, including existing approvals by the appropriate regulatory authorities
to market OncoScint CR/OV in twelve countries in Europe. This reacquisition
was consummated on February 16, 1995. See Note 11 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements. The Company recognized contract and product related
revenues from Chiron of $3,000, $162,000 and $164,000 in fiscal years 1995,
1994 and 1993, respectively.

Faulding. In December 1995, CYTOGEN entered into a distribution agreement
(the "Faulding Agreement") with Faulding (Canada) Inc. ("Faulding") granting
to Faulding the exclusive right to distribute and sell OncoScint CR/OV in
Canada. Faulding is currently pursuing the necessary regulatory approvals to
market the product in Canada. Pursuant to the terms of the Faulding Agreement,
in addition to an up-front cash payment made upon executing the Faulding
Agreement, Faulding is required to make an additional payment to CYTOGEN upon
the receipt of certain regulatory approvals. The Faulding Agreement also
provides for payments for minimum annual purchases of OncoScint CR/OV by
Faulding, and for certain royalties based upon net sales, if any, of OncoScint
CR/OV by Faulding. The initial term of the Faulding Agreement is seven years.

CIS biointernational. In January 1996, CYTOGEN entered into a distribution
agreement (the "CISbio Agreement") with CISbio, granting to CISbio the
exclusive right to distribute and sell OncoScint CR/OV in all the countries of
the world, except for the U.S. and Canada. CISbio has advised CYTOGEN that it
expects to re-launch OncoScint CR/OV in eight Western European and four
Eastern European countries where the product is approved for marketing, during
1996, and, pursuant to the terms of the CISbio Agreement, CISbio is required
to obtain the necessary regulatory approvals in an additional twenty-two
countries. Pursuant to the terms of the CISbio Agreement, in addition to an
up-front cash payment made upon executing the CISbio Agreement, CISbio is
required to make an additional payment to CYTOGEN upon the achievement of a
specified marketing milestone. The CISbio Agreement also provides for minimum
annual purchases of the components of OncoScint CR/OV by CISbio, and for
certain royalties based upon net sales, if any, of OncoScint CR/OV by CISbio.
The initial term of the CISbio Agreement is seven years following the first
commercial sale of the product by CISbio.

7


QUADRAMET

DuPont Merck. On December 20, 1994, CYTOGEN entered into a license agreement
(the "DP/Merck Agreement") with DuPont Merck. Under the terms of the DP/Merck
Agreement, CYTOGEN granted to DuPont Merck an exclusive sub-license with
respect to CYTOGEN's rights to Quadramet pursuant to which DuPont Merck will
have responsibility for manufacturing and marketing Quadramet in the U.S., if
and when approved for marketing by FDA. The Company has retained the right to
co-promote the product to nuclear medicine specialists. See "Cancer
Therapeutic Products--Quadramet" and Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.

The DP/Merck Agreement provides that CYTOGEN receives from DuPont Merck up-
front fees and milestone payments consisting of: (i) $1.0 million upon
execution of the DP/Merck Agreement, which has been paid to CYTOGEN; (ii) $4.0
million from the sale to DuPont Merck of 908,265 shares of CYTOGEN common
stock within 20 days of the execution of the DP/Merck Agreement, which sale
has occurred, (iii) $4.25 million to fund additional clinical programs to
expand the use and marketing of Quadramet, of which $1.3 million was received
in 1995, (iv) a $2.0 million milestone payment if and when Quadramet receives
FDA approval and (v) royalty payments based on sales, including guaranteed
minimum payments.

RELATIONSHIP AND SUBSEQUENT MERGER WITH CYTORAD

CytoRad Incorporated ("CytoRad"), a biopharmaceutical company formed in
December 1991, was established to engage in the research and development of
proprietary antibody-based delivery systems for the diagnosis and/or treatment
of prostate, ovarian and bladder cancers, utilizing technology licensed from
CYTOGEN. In connection with a public offering for CytoRad units, which
commenced in February 1992, CYTOGEN and CytoRad entered into a series of
contractual arrangements. Subject to the terms and conditions of the
agreements between CYTOGEN and CytoRad, CytoRad was required to make up-front
and periodic payments to CYTOGEN, and in return CYTOGEN conducted research and
development on behalf of CytoRad relating to the products licensed pursuant to
agreements. As a result of the agreements, CYTOGEN recorded $5,903,000 of
contract revenues in fiscal year 1993, in addition to $2.0 million in up-front
license fees received from CytoRad in fiscal year 1993.

In March 1994, CytoRad announced that it was exploring modifications to its
then existing business relationship with CYTOGEN. Accordingly, the CytoRad
Board of Directors did not approve the 1994 development agreement budget and
subsequently, no contract revenues from CytoRad were recorded by CYTOGEN in
fiscal year 1994. During fiscal year 1993, funds provided under those
agreements represented the principal source of funding for the development of
the products involved.

On November 15, 1994, CYTOGEN and CytoRad executed an Agreement and Plan of
Merger (the "CytoRad Merger Agreement") to purchase all of CytoRad's
outstanding units. Pursuant to the CytoRad Merger Agreement, on January 20,
1995, CYTOGEN commenced an exchange offer to exchange for each CytoRad unit
(a) 1.5 shares of CYTOGEN common stock, (b) a warrant to acquire one share of
CYTOGEN common stock for $8.00 that expires January 31, 1997 and (c) a
contingent value right (a "CVR") to receive, under certain circumstances and
at no additional cost, up to an additional one-half share of CYTOGEN common
stock.

On February 27, 1995, CYTOGEN completed its acquisition of CytoRad by
merging CytoRad with and into a wholly-owned subsidiary of CYTOGEN pursuant to
the CytoRad Merger Agreement. Holders of CytoRad common stock who did not
tender their CytoRad units in the exchange offer became entitled to receive as
a result of the merger one and one-half shares of CYTOGEN common stock and one
CVR for each share of CytoRad common stock owned thereby. Although the
previously issued warrants forming a part of the CytoRad units not tendered in
the exchange offer will remain outstanding following the merger, CYTOGEN has
agreed that such warrants will be exercisable at $8.00 per warrant share
pursuant to the CytoRad Merger Agreement.


8


As a result of the acquisition, CYTOGEN reacquired all rights it had
previously licensed to CytoRad. In addition, as a result of the merger, $11.7
million of CytoRad's cash and securities, before payment of certain of
CYTOGEN's transaction costs, were acquired by the Company.

On February 29, 1996, CYTOGEN announced that the CVRs had terminated by
their terms and were of no further value. Accordingly, CYTOGEN no longer has
an obligation to issue shares of its common stock to holders of CVRs on
January 31, 1997.

MERGER WITH CELLCOR

In June 1995, CYTOGEN entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, as
amended (the "Merger Agreement"), with Cellcor, Inc. ("Cellcor") and a wholly-
owned subsidiary of CYTOGEN (the "Merger Subsidiary"), which provided that
Cellcor would be merged with and into the Merger Subsidiary (the "Cellcor
Merger"), whereupon the separate corporate existence of Cellcor would cease
and the Merger Subsidiary would change its name to Cellcor, Inc. Hillman
Medical Ventures partnerships and certain of their affiliates (collectively,
the "Cellcor Principal Stockholders") owned 46.5% of the Cellcor common stock
and 95.2% of the Cellcor preferred stock. The Cellcor Principal Stockholders
agreed to vote such shares in favor of the Cellcor Merger pursuant to a Voting
and Subscription Agreement (the "Voting Agreement").

In connection with the Cellcor Merger, each holder of Cellcor common stock
was granted the non-transferable right to purchase 1.118 shares of CYTOGEN
common stock for each share of Cellcor common stock held by such holder at the
close of business on August 17, 1995, at a price of $3.89 per share of CYTOGEN
common stock (the "Subscription Offering"). Certain of the Cellcor Principal
Stockholders purchased $11.5 million of the shares in the Subscription
Offering.

On October 16, 1995, CYTOGEN's stockholders approved the issuance of
securities necessary to effect the acquisition of Cellcor and the Subscription
Offering. On October 20, 1995, CYTOGEN completed its acquisition of Cellcor by
merging Cellcor with and into the Merger Subsidiary. At that time, each
outstanding share of Cellcor common stock was converted into the right to
receive 0.60 shares of CYTOGEN common stock and each outstanding share of
Cellcor Convertible Preferred Stock was converted into the right to receive
218.94 shares of CYTOGEN common stock. As a result of the Cellcor Merger,
CYTOGEN (i) issued 4,713,564 shares of common stock to acquire Cellcor (see
Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements), (ii) issued 5,144,388 shares
of common stock in connection with the Subscription Offering, which raised a
total of $20.0 million (including the $11.5 million purchased by the Cellcor
Principal Stockholders) and (iii) reserved for issuance up to 613,694 shares
of common stock issuable upon the exercise of Cellcor stock options and
warrants assumed by CYTOGEN in the Cellcor Merger. Pursuant to the terms of
the Voting Agreement, the Cellcor Principal Stockholders have also agreed that
they will not contract to sell, sell or otherwise transfer any shares of
CYTOGEN common stock received by them in the Cellcor Merger or purchased by
them in the Subscription Offering for a period of two years following the
effective date of the Cellcor Merger. On the second anniversary of the Cellcor
Merger and each six month anniversary thereafter, the Cellcor Principal
Stockholders may so sell or transfer one third of the shares so acquired.

The Cellcor Merger reflects the Company's strategy to build its business
through, among other things, strategic acquisitions that add complementary
products, technologies and services to CYTOGEN's existing portfolio. In
particular, the Company has added Cellcor's proprietary ALT products and
supportive core competencies in ex vivo cell processing to its product
pipeline. See "Cancer Therapeutics Products--ALT Treatment for mRCC".

LIMITED FIELD OF USE LICENSE AGREEMENTS

In addition to development of its own proprietary products, CYTOGEN and
Cellcor have entered into limited field of use licenses for rights in their
proprietary technology with various pharmaceutical companies in the U.S.,
Europe, and Japan. Although the terms of each agreement differ, these
agreements generally provide

9


for royalty payments to the Company based on any future product sales. Some of
these agreements also provide for fixed payments, purchases of CYTOGEN stock,
milestone payments and payments for research services performed by the
Company.

Elan. In December 1995, CYTOGEN entered into a Research and Development and
Option agreement with Elan (the "Elan Agreement") under which both parties
will implement a research program that combines CYTOGEN's GDL technology with
Elan's drug delivery system technology. Joint research, conducted by the
companies' scientists, will exploit GDL-derived peptides that have the ability
to target drugs to specific sites within the body. Initial research will focus
on the development of products that can be administered orally and pass
through the gastrointestinal tract, utilizing specific intestinal cell surface
receptors identified by Elan's research team as being best suited to
facilitate uptake and absorption of the drug. Under the Elan Agreement, Elan
has been granted an option for exclusive worldwide licensing rights to any
products developed collaboratively and the Company will receive royalties
based on sales, if any, of such products. The Elan Agreement states that the
parties anticipate that the research program will continue for an initial
period of sixteen months but may be extended for up to an additional one year
period by Elan. Elan will provide the funding necessary for both companies to
fulfill their respective obligations, with the total cost for the initial
period of the research program not to exceed $3.0 million, of which not more
than $1.5 million will be paid to the Company.

Lilly. In April 1989, CYTOGEN entered into limited field of use license
agreements with Eli Lilly and Company ("Lilly") (collectively, the "Lilly
Agreement") granting to Lilly a non-exclusive worldwide license to develop and
market certain cancer therapy products using CYTOGEN's proprietary monoclonal
antibody linker technology to deliver the vinca alkaloid class of compounds,
and other cancer therapy drugs proprietary to Lilly. Pursuant to the terms of
the Lilly Agreement, in addition to the cash payment and stock purchase
already made, Lilly is required to make certain payments to CYTOGEN which in
some cases are dependent upon Lilly's achievement of certain scientific
milestones in its research. The Lilly Agreement also provides for royalty
payments (which are subject to abatement to a certain extent based on
milestone payments made) based on net sales of any resulting products. Under
the Lilly Agreement, CYTOGEN is required to inform Lilly of improvements to
CYTOGEN's technology and Lilly can terminate the Lilly Agreement at any time
following the milestone payments described above upon 60 days' prior notice.

SRL, Inc. In March 1994, Cellcor announced the signing of a non-exclusive
technology licensing and service agreement with SRL, Inc. ("SRL"), a Japanese
diagnostic firm. Under the agreement (the "SRL Agreement"), SRL has the right
to select from several development options. Varying payments are due to
Cellcor depending on the option SRL elects. At this time, the Company expects
that it is unlikely that SRL will elect an option that will have a significant
impact on its operations or capital needs and there can be no assurance that
SRL will elect any development options in the future.

MANUFACTURING

CYTOGEN has established limited commercial-scale manufacturing capacity in
Princeton, New Jersey. An Establishment License Application ("ELA") for the
facility in Princeton utilized by CYTOGEN for production of OncoScint CR/OV
was approved by FDA in December 1992. It is expected that this facility will
allow CYTOGEN to meet its projected production requirements for the OncoScint
product line in both the U.S. and Europe for the near term, although no
assurances can be given to that effect. In 1993 and 1994, CYTOGEN received
additional regulatory approval from FDA for the expansion of its commercial
manufacturing processes and facilities. In November 1995, FDA proposed new
reforms that would eliminate the requirement that "well-characterized biologic
products" be commercially manufactured in an ELA-approved facility. Therefore,
while CYTOGEN will be required to maintain Good Manufacturing Practices
("GMP"), under the proposed reforms, it will not be required to obtain
regulatory approval for all of its commercial manufacturing processes and
facilities. Moreover, under the proposed reforms, CYTOGEN will retain the
status of having met FDA ELA requirements and performance standards, which it
believes is an important competitive advantage and one it is using to attract
additional contract manufacturing business. To date, CYTOGEN has had two
contract manufacturing customers for which it is manufacturing clinical
supplies.

10


In 1994, CYTOGEN's manufacturing facility was expanded to provide processes
and facilities for the manufacture of commercial quantities of the antibody
used in ProstaScint. An ELA Supplement was prepared in 1994 in conjunction
with the PLA for ProstaScint filed by FDA in March 1995. After receipt of
necessary regulatory approvals, CYTOGEN's facility will be the site for the
commercial manufacture of ProstaScint. It is expected that this facility will
allow CYTOGEN to manufacture its projected production requirements of
ProstaScint for the near term, although no assurance can be given that the
facility will receive the necessary regulatory approvals to produce commercial
quantities of antibodies for ProstaScint, or that commercial quantities of
antibodies will be otherwise obtained.

Cellcor has established a GMP manufacturing facility for patient-specific
cell processing in a high volume setting, suitable for commercial-scale
production. Cellcor will pursue opportunities to develop contract
manufacturing relationships with other biotechnology companies and academic
institutions in the field of patient specific ex vivo cell processing.

RAW MATERIALS

The raw materials used in the manufacture of the Company's products include
several different antibodies. CYTOGEN has both exclusive and non-exclusive
license agreements which permit the use of specific monoclonal antibodies in
its products. CYTOGEN's first product, OncoScint CR/OV, uses the same
monoclonal antibody which has been supplied in clinical quantities and is
being supplied in commercial quantities by a single contract manufacturer,
Celltech Limited, through a shared manufacturing agreement. CYTOGEN
anticipates that the supplier will be able to meet CYTOGEN's needs for
commercial quantities of monoclonal antibody.

CYTOGEN currently has the in-house production capacity necessary to produce
projected commercial quantities of monoclonal antibody for manufacture of
ProstaScint and clinical quantities of other monoclonal antibodies to develop
other diagnostic imaging and therapy products.

Cellcor's cellular therapies require the use of devices and materials
manufactured by third parties, which Cellcor seeks to maintain multiple
sources for. Cellcor relies on a single source of supply for an important
monoclonal antibody used in the cell processing procedures. There can be no
assurance that products or devices necessary to implement the Company's living
cell therapies will be continuously available or available upon terms
favorable to the Company in the future.

HUMAN RESOURCES

As of December 31, 1995, the Company employed 153 persons full-time, of whom
45 were engaged in research and development activities, 40 were engaged in
operations and manufacturing, 21 were engaged in administration and
management, 18 were engaged in selling and marketing and 29 were engaged in
Cellcor's operations. Of the Company's employees, 25 hold Ph.D. and/or M.D.
degrees, and 18 hold other advanced degrees. The Company, from time to time,
hires scientific consultants to work on certain of its research and
development programs. The Company believes that it has been successful in
attracting skilled and experienced scientific personnel; however, competition
for such personnel is intense.

None of the Company's employees is covered by a collective bargaining
agreement. All of the Company's employees have executed confidentiality
agreements. The Company considers relations with its employees to be
excellent.

PATENTS AND PROPRIETARY RIGHTS

Consistent with industry practice, the Company has a policy of using patent
and trade secret protection to preserve its right to exploit the results of
its research and development activities and, to the extent it may be necessary
or advisable, to exclude others from appropriating the Company's proprietary
technology.


11


The Company's policy is to aggressively protect its proprietary technology
by selectively seeking patent protection in a worldwide program. In addition
to the U.S., CYTOGEN files patent applications in Canada, major European
countries, Japan and additional foreign countries on a selective basis to
protect inventions important to the development of its business. CYTOGEN
believes that the countries in which it has obtained and is seeking patent
coverage for its proprietary technology represent the major focus of the
pharmaceutical industry in which CYTOGEN and certain of its licensees will
market its and their respective products.

CYTOGEN holds 13 current U.S. patents and 52 current foreign patents.
CYTOGEN has filed and currently has pending 21 U.S. patent applications and 24
foreign patent applications, covering certain aspects of its technology for
diagnostic and therapeutic products, and the methods for their production and
use. CYTOGEN intends to file patent applications with respect to subsequent
developments and improvements when it believes such protection is in the best
interest of CYTOGEN.

CYTOGEN's U.S. Patent No. 4,671,958, entitled "Antibody Conjugates For The
Delivery of Compounds To Target Sites," is basic to many of CYTOGEN's current
and proposed commercial operations. This patent covers in vivo delivery
methods using site-specific attachment of compounds to antibody molecules that
maintain the antibody's ability to target and bind to antigens such as those
expressed by or associated with tumors, blood clots, infections and other
disease sites. This patent is scheduled to expire in 2004. In Europe, similar
protection is afforded by CYTOGEN's European Patent No. 0088695, entitled
"Antibody Conjugates."

CYTOGEN's U.S. Patent No. 4,741,900, entitled "Antibody Metal Ion
Complexes," provides additional patent protection for its most advanced
products which involve the targeting of radioisotopes to tumor cells for
purposes of diagnosing or treating cancer. This patent is scheduled to expire
in 2004. CYTOGEN's European Patent No. 0173629, entitled "Antibody Metal Ion
Complexes" affords similar protection in Europe.

CYTOGEN's U.S. Patent No. 4,867,973, entitled "Antibody-Therapeutic Agent
Conjugates," provides broad patent protection for many of CYTOGEN's proposed
commercial products and those of its licensees which are useful for the in
vivo targeting of therapeutic agents for the treatment of a variety of
cellular disorders. This patent is scheduled to expire in 2004.

CYTOGEN's U.S. Patent No. 5,162,504, entitled "Monoclonal Antibodies to a
New Antigenic Marker in Epithelial Prostate Cells and Serum of Prostate Cancer
Patients," provides protection for the monoclonal antibody 7E11-C5, the
targeting agent used in ProstaScint.

Cellcor holds 3 current U.S. patents. Cellcor has filed and currently has
pending 4 U.S. patent applications and 2 foreign patent applications.
Additional patent protection is being actively pursued for Cellcor related
proprietary technology.

CYTOGEN is the exclusive licensee of certain patent applications held by the
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill covering GDL technology. CYTOGEN
holds an exclusive option for an exclusive license under certain patent
applications held by MSKCC covering PSM. CYTOGEN is the exclusive licensee of
certain U.S. patents and applications held by Dow covering Quadramet.

CYTOGEN may be entitled under certain circumstances to seek extension of the
terms of its patents. See "Government Regulation and Product Testing--FDA
Approval".

The Company also relies upon, and intends to continue to rely upon, trade
secrets, unpatented proprietary know-how and continuing technological
innovation to develop and maintain its competitive position. The Company
typically enters into confidentiality agreements with its licensees and any
scientific consultants, and each of CYTOGEN's and Cellcor's employees have
entered into agreements with the companies requiring that they forbear from
disclosing confidential information of the companies, and assign to the
companies all rights in any inventions made while in their employ. The Company
believes that its valuable proprietary information is protected to the fullest
extent practicable; however, there can be no assurance that (i) any additional
patents will

12


be issued to CYTOGEN or Cellcor in any or all appropriate jurisdictions, (ii)
litigation will not be commenced seeking to challenge the patent protection or
such challenges will not be successful, (iii) the Company's processes or
products do not or will not infringe upon the patents of third parties, or
(iv) the scope of patents issued will successfully prevent third parties from
developing similar and competitive products. It is not possible to predict how
any patent litigation will affect the Company's efforts to develop,
manufacture or market its products.

The technology applicable to the Company's products is developing rapidly. A
substantial number of patents have been issued to other biotechnology
companies. In addition, competitors have filed applications for, or have been
issued, patents and may obtain additional patents and proprietary rights
relating to products or processes competitive with those of the Company. In
addition, others may have filed patent applications and may have been issued
patents to products and to technologies potentially useful to the Company or
necessary to commercialize its products or achieve its business goals. There
can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain licenses of such
patents on terms acceptable to the Company. See "Competition."

OncoScint is a registered trademark of CYTOGEN. ProstaScint, PIE and SynGene
are trademarks of CYTOGEN, pending registration. Quadramet is a trademark of
Dow, licensed to CYTOGEN.

GOVERNMENT REGULATION AND PRODUCT TESTING

The development, manufacture and sale of medical products utilizing the
Company's technology are governed by a variety of statutes and regulations in
the U.S. and by comparable laws and agency regulations in most foreign
countries.

FDA Approval. The major regulatory impact on the diagnostic and therapeutic
products in the U.S. derives from the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (the
"FD&C Act") and the Public Health Service Act, and from FDA rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder. These acts and regulations require
carefully controlled research and testing of products, government review
and/or approval prior to marketing the products, inspection and/or licensing
of manufacturing and production facilities, adherence to good manufacturing
practices during production and continued compliance with product
specifications, labeling, and other post-production regulations.

The medical products to which the Company intends to apply its technology
are subject to substantial governmental regulation and may be classified as
new drugs or biologics under the FD&C Act. FDA and similar health authorities
in most other countries must approve or license the diagnostic and therapeutic
products before they can be commercially marketed. In order to obtain FDA
approval, an applicant must submit, as relevant for the particular product,
proof of safety, purity, potency and efficacy. In most cases such proof
entails extensive pre-clinical, clinical and laboratory tests. The testing,
preparation of necessary applications and processing of those applications by
FDA is expensive and time-consuming, and may take several years to complete.
Together with approval of its ELA with respect to its manufacturing facility
in New Jersey, CYTOGEN received initial FDA approval in December 1992 to
market OncoScint CR/OV in the U.S. under a single administration indication.
The Company received repeat administration approval in November 1995.
Difficulties or unanticipated costs may be encountered by the Company or its
licensees in their respective efforts to secure necessary governmental
approval or licenses, which could delay or preclude the Company or its
licensees from marketing their products. Limited indications for use or other
conditions could also be placed on any such approvals that could restrict the
commercial applications of such products. With respect to patented products or
technologies, delays imposed by the government approval process may materially
reduce the period during which the Company will have the exclusive right to
exploit them, because patent protection lasts only for a limited time,
beginning on the date the patent is first granted in the case of U.S. patent
applications and when the patent application is first filed in the case of
patent applications filed in the European Economic Community. CYTOGEN intends
to seek to maximize the useful life of its patents under the Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 in the U.S. and similar laws if available in other
countries.


13


The majority of the diagnostic and therapeutic products will likely be
classified as new drugs or biologics and will be subject to the conduct of in
vitro tests, pre-clinical testing and a three-phase evaluation process in
humans before any marketing application can be prepared. In Phase I, a product
is tested in a small number of patients primarily for safety at one or more
dosages. In Phase II, in addition to safety, the efficacy of the product
against particular diseases is evaluated in a patient population generally
somewhat larger than Phase I. Clinical trials of certain diagnostic and cancer
therapeutic agents frequently combine Phase I and Phase II into a single Phase
I/II study. In Phase III, the product is evaluated in a larger patient
population sufficient to generate data to support a claim of safety and
efficacy within the meaning of the FD&C Act. Authorization or clearance under
the FD&C Act by FDA must be obtained prior to conducting clinical testing by
the filing of an exemption for an Investigational New Drug which includes the
results of in vitro tests and pre-clinical testing. A similar procedure under
the FD&C Act applies to medical devices and diagnostic products.

A PLA summarizes the results of clinical tests and other product testing and
must be filed with an ELA for the licensing of the product manufacturing
processes and facilities for biologics which do not meet the definition of
"well-characterized biologic products." An NDA, which is similar to a PLA, may
be required to be filed if the product is classified as a drug rather than a
biologic.

Prior to a PLA or NDA submission, FDA conducts a pre-PLA/NDA meeting. The
use of pre-PLA/NDA meetings has increased due to the introduction of FDA User
Fees and the increased commitment on the part of FDA to conduct timely reviews
of filed applications. The primary purpose of both the pre-PLA and pre-NDA
meeting is for the sponsor and FDA to discuss the content and timing of the
application and determine whether FDA agrees with the sponsor, based on its
preliminary review of the application, that the application is sufficiently
complete to be filed and/or to identify any areas that need further evaluation
or discussion prior to the filing.

Based on FDA regulations, once an application is submitted to FDA, FDA has
60 days to determine whether or not the application is sufficiently complete
to be filed. If FDA believes the application is not complete, FDA issues a
refuse-to-file letter to the sponsor.

Continued compliance with all requirements of the FD&C Act and the
conditions in an approved application, including but not limited to product
specification, manufacturing process, labeling and promotional material, and
record keeping and reporting requirements, is necessary for all products.
Failure to comply, or the occurrence of unanticipated adverse effects during
commercial marketing, could lead to the need for product recall, or FDA-
initiated action, which could delay further marketing until the products are
brought into compliance. Similar laws and regulations apply in most foreign
countries where the diagnostic and therapeutic products are likely to be
marketed.

Upon certain circumstances defined in the FD&C Act, certain products may be
sold and distributed, in limited quantities, prior to receipt of final FDA
approval. The Company believes that certain of its products may qualify for
such treatment; however, there can be no assurance that FDA will allow such
sales or distribution. FDA has established a process called the Treatment
Investigational New Drug ("IND") which makes investigational drugs available
for the treatment of patients with a serious or life-threatening disease. For
investigational drugs to be eligible for a Treatment IND program, there can be
no comparable or satisfactory alternative drug or therapy available to treat
the particular disease in the intended patient population. In September 1995,
FDA approved a Treatment IND program for ALT to be available as a treatment
option to patients with mRCC who were not able to participate in ALT clinical
trials. The Treatment IND also allows Cellcor to charge patients for the cost
of the treatment. Cellcor has also received authorization from FDA for cost
recovery related to the treatment of patients receiving ALT for mRCC under a
compassionate use protocol. The only patients who are eligible to participate
in this program are patients who have already received six or more treatments
in a commercial or research setting. Cellcor was treating approximately 20
patients under this protocol at the end of 1995.


14


Orphan Drug Act. The Orphan Drug Act is intended to provide incentives to
manufacturers to develop and market drugs for rare diseases or conditions
affecting fewer than 200,000 persons in the U.S. at the time of application
for orphan drug designation. A drug that receives orphan drug designation and
is the first product to receive FDA marketing approval for a particular
indication is entitled to orphan drug status, a seven-year exclusive marketing
period in the U.S. for that indication. OncoScint CR/OV, in its ovarian
application, has been designated an orphan drug. Under the Orphan Drug Act,
the FDA cannot approve any application by another party to market an identical
product for treatment of an identical indication unless (i) such party has a
license from the holder of orphan drug status, or (ii) the holder of orphan
drug status is unable to assure an adequate supply of the drug. However, a
drug that is considered by FDA to be different from a particular orphan drug
is not barred from sale in the U.S. during such seven-year exclusive marketing
period even if it receives marketing approval for the same product claim.

Other Regulations. In addition to regulations enforced by FDA, the Company
is also subject to regulation under the Occupational Safety and Health Act,
the Environmental Protection Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Nuclear Regulatory Commission and
other present and potential future federal, state or local regulations.

Foreign Regulatory Approval. Prior to marketing its products in Western
Europe and certain other countries, the Company will be required to receive
the favorable recommendation of the CPMP followed by the appropriate
government agencies of the respective countries. Substantial requirements,
comparable in many respects to those imposed under the FD&C Act, will have to
be met before commercial sale is permissible in most countries. There can be
no assurance, however, as to whether or when governmental approvals (other
than those already obtained) will be obtained or as to the terms or scope of
those approvals.

COMPETITION

The biopharmaceutical field is expected to continue to undergo rapid and
significant technological change as well as extensive consolidation. Potential
competitors in the U.S. are numerous and include pharmaceutical, chemical,
biotechnology, medical device companies and research institutions, many of
which have substantially greater capital resources, marketing experience,
research and development staffs and facilities than the Company. This
competition can be expected to become more intense as commercial applications
for biotechnology and pharmaceutical products increase. Some of these
companies may be better able than the Company to develop, refine and market
products based on monoclonal antibody-based technology, immunotherapy, or on
other technologies applicable to the diagnosis and treatment of cancer such as
CT, MRI, and chemotherapeutic products. The Company is aware that several
companies are engaged in the development of technology and products for
targeted radioisotopic and drug delivery, and cellular and gene therapies. The
Company understands that certain of these competitors are in the process of
conducting human clinical trials, have filed applications for marketing
approval by government agencies, or have received marketing approval by
government agencies of certain products which will compete with the Company's
diagnostic and therapeutic products. Pursuant to its limited field of use
license agreements, CYTOGEN has granted certain rights to its licensees to
develop and market cancer therapy products which may compete directly with
CYTOGEN's diagnostic and therapeutic products. CYTOGEN will receive royalties
from any sale of such licensed products and CYTOGEN believes the information
which presently is publicly available is insufficient to enable it to
definitively evaluate the likely success of these competing products. CYTOGEN
depends principally upon its patented antibody-based linker technology to
compete with other firms engaged in commercial applications of antibody
technology. For this reason, CYTOGEN has focused on those applications where
it believes its technology will offer significant advantages over other
existing technologies and its patents offer the most protection.

CUSTOMERS

In fiscal year 1995, the Company received 78% of its total product related,
license and contract revenues from three (3) customers: $2.0 million from Dow
(see Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements);

15


$1.3 million from DuPont Merck (see "Marketing and Sales--Quadramet" and Note
4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements); and $621,000 from Medi-Physics,
Inc., a chain of radiopharmacies.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

The Company's corporate headquarters is located in Princeton, New Jersey.
CYTOGEN currently leases approximately 107,700 square feet of administrative,
laboratory and manufacturing space in three locations in Princeton. The lease
for its 56,900 square foot laboratory and manufacturing facility in Princeton
will expire on February 28, 2003 and provides two 5-year renewal options.
CYTOGEN has sub-leased 8,715 square feet of the laboratory facility to another
company. This sub-lease will expire on April 30, 1996. The lease for CYTOGEN's
31,400 square foot office space in Princeton will expire on June 15, 1997,
subject to CYTOGEN's right to renew through June 15, 2002. CYTOGEN also leases
an additional 19,400 square feet at a third location in Princeton, under a
lease which will expire in December 1999. This third location is used for
laboratories and support for production of commercial product. CYTOGEN expects
to remain in the Princeton area for the foreseeable future. As of December 31,
1995, the Company had invested approximately $9.8 million for improvements in
these buildings it occupies.

Cellcor leases 21,500 square feet in Newton, Massachusetts, which houses all
of Cellcor's administrative staff and research and operations groups. The
lease for this facility will expire on February 29, 2000. Approximately 25% of
the facility has been sub-leased to another company under a short-term lease
arrangement.

The Company leases some of the equipment used in its laboratory and
manufacturing facility. See Notes 11 and 18 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements included in this Form 10-K for information regarding the Company's
obligations under these real property and equipment leases. The Company
believes its facilities are in good operating condition and that all real
property and equipment are adequate for all present and proposed uses thereof.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On April 24, 1995, Cellcor announced that it had agreed to settle a
stockholder class action suit brought by William L. Glosser, as representative
of a class of Cellcor's stockholders, against Cellcor, Cellcor's directors and
Furman Selz Incorporated, individually and as the representative of the 26
underwriters of Cellcor's initial public offering. The suit was originally
filed in the Court of Chancery of Delaware on September 18, 1992 and alleged
certain securities law violations.

At a hearing held on December 21, 1995, an Order and Final Judgment was
entered by Chancellor Allen, the Court of Chancery of Delaware, approving the
settlement between the parties, which provided for a $700,000 cash payment
(which includes approximately $300,000 of fees and expenses of plaintiff's
counsel) to the members of the plaintiff class in return for dismissal of all
claims against the defendants. Cellcor's insurance carriers paid over $440,000
towards the settlement and Cellcor paid the balance.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

On October 16, 1995, CYTOGEN held a special meeting of stockholders to
approve the issuance of the CYTOGEN's securities necessary to effect the
acquisition of Cellcor and to undertake a Subscription Offering to Cellcor
stockholders. The following table sets forth information regarding the number
of votes cast for, against, abstentions, as well as the number of broker non-
votes with respect to the approval of the issuance of CYTOGEN's securities:



BROKER
FOR AGAINST ABSTENTIONS NON-VOTES
--- ------- ----------- ---------

16,496,706 597,185 212,336 0



16


EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

The executive officers of the Company and their respective ages and
positions with the Company as of March 1, 1996 are as follows:



NAME AGE POSITION
---- --- --------

William C. Mills III 40 Chairman of the Board
Thomas J. McKearn 47 Chief Executive Officer and President
T. Jerome Madison 55 Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer
and Secretary
L. Michael Hinds 54 Vice President, Marketing and Sales
Robert T. Maguire 45 Vice President, Medical Affairs
Frederick M. Miesowicz 47 Vice President and Vice President and
General Manager of Cellcor
Richard Murawski 47 Vice President, Operations
Pamela M. Murphy 45 Vice President, Corporate Communications
Charles W. Ogelsby 52 Corporate Controller and Assistant Secretary
John D. Rodwell 49 Vice President, Research and Development
Richard J. Walsh 52 Vice President, Corporate Development


All executive officers are elected annually by the Board of Directors. There
is no family relationship among any of the executive officers or directors.

BUSINESS EXPERIENCE

William C. Mills III has served as Chairman of the Board of the Company
since January 1995 and has been a director of the Company since July 1983.
Since April 1, 1988, he has been a General Partner of The Venture Capital Fund
of New England, Boston, Massachusetts, a series of private venture capital
partnerships. Prior to that, Mr. Mills was a General Partner of PaineWebber
Ventures, and certain of its predecessor partnerships since April 1981. Mr.
Mills holds an A.B. degree from Princeton University, an S.M. degree in
Chemistry from The Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and an S.M. degree
in Management from M.I.T.'s Sloan School of Management.

Thomas J. McKearn joined the Company in July 1981 as Vice President,
Research and Development. He has served as the Company's Chief Executive
Officer since January 1994 and as President of the Company since September
1991. Dr. McKearn previously served as Executive Vice President of the Company
from June 1990 to August 1991 and Senior Vice President, Scientific Affairs of
the Company through June 1990. He has been a director of the Company since
1981. From 1978 until he joined the Company, Dr. McKearn was an Assistant
Professor in the Department of Pathology at the University of Pennsylvania and
Head of the Immunoprotein Laboratory at the Hospital of the University of
Pennsylvania. He retains a position as Adjunct Associate Professor in the
Department of Pathology at the University of Pennsylvania. Dr. McKearn is a
member of the Scientific Advisory Board for Rider College and the New Jersey
Cancer Institute. Dr. McKearn holds a B.A. degree from Indiana University, a
Ph.D. degree in Immunology from the University of Chicago and an M.D. degree
from the Pritzker School of Medicine at the University of Chicago.

T. Jerome Madison joined the Company in October 1993 as Vice President of
Finance and Chief Financial Officer and Secretary. He has been a director of
the Company since December 1994. Mr. Madison is the sole stockholder, and an
officer and director of Somerset Central Corporation, a New Jersey corporation
through which Mr. Madison provides services to the Company. Previously, Mr.
Madison served as President, Chief Executive Officer and General Partner of
Montgomery Partners, a venture capital group, from 1991 to 1993 and as
President, Chief Executive Officer and General Partner of Founders Court, also
a venture capital group, from 1986 to 1991. Mr. Madison was Vice President for
finance and administration of the Company from 1982 to 1986. Prior to first
joining the Company, he served as Corporate Controller for Rorer Group Inc.,
(now Rhone-

17


Poulenc Rorer). Mr. Madison holds a B.S. from The Wharton School of the
University of Pennsylvania and an M.B.A. from Monmouth University. He is also
a Certified Public Accountant.

L. Michael Hinds joined the Company in October 1995 as Vice President,
Marketing and Sales. From 1981 until he joined the Company, Mr. Hinds held a
variety of management positions at Picker International, Inc., a diagnostic
imaging company, serving as Vice President, Western Europe from 1991 to 1994,
and Vice President, International from 1983 to 1991. Mr. Hinds holds a B.A.
degree from the University of Bordeaux and a Ph.D. in international economics
from the University of Paris.

Robert T. Maguire joined the Company in June 1987. He served as Director,
Clinical Investigations and Vice-President, Clinical Investigations of the
Company until September 1995, at which time he was elected Vice President,
Medical Affairs. Prior to joining the Company, Dr. Maguire held the position
of Director, Clinical Research at Wyeth Laboratories. From 1979 to 1983, Dr.
Maguire was a Clinical Associate in the Pediatric Oncology Branch, Laboratory
of Chemical Pharmacology and the Laboratory of Carcinogen Metabolism at the
National Cancer Institute. Dr. Maguire holds an A.B. degree from Princeton
University and an M.D. degree from Temple University Medical School.

Frederick M. Miesowicz joined the Company in October 1995 as Vice President
of the Company. He also serves as Vice President and General Manager of
Cellcor. Prior to joining the Company, Dr. Miesowicz served as Cellcor's
Senior Vice President of Scientific Affairs since October 1992. Dr. Miesowicz
has an extensive background in cellular therapies. Prior to joining Cellcor,
he managed the United States and European SteriCell Division of Terumo Medical
Corp. and was with E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Company for over 14 years. In
1986, he assumed development responsibility for DuPont's cellular therapy
business, working with the National Cancer Institute and others on ex vivo
immunotherapies (lymphokine activated killer cells and tumor infiltrating
lymphocytes for cancer). He holds a B.S. in Chemistry from Siena College and a
Ph.D. in Chemistry from Harvard University.

Richard Murawski joined the Company in April 1994 as Vice President,
Operations. Mr. Murawski served as Vice President, Operations of Immunomedics,
a biopharmaceutical company engaged in the development of antibody products
for cancers and infectious diseases, from 1993 to 1994 and as Director of
Manufacturing and Director of Operations with Welgen/Wellcome from 1990 to
1992. From 1971 through 1990, Mr. Murawski held numerous positions in the
areas of production, engineering and manufacturing at Schering Corporation, a
Union, New Jersey research-based company engaged in the manufacture and
production of pharmaceutical and healthcare products. He holds a B.S. in
Chemical Engineering from Newark College of Engineering (currently New Jersey
Institute of Technology).

Pamela M. Murphy joined the Company in March 1994 as Vice President,
Corporate Communications. Ms. Murphy served as Vice President, Corporate
Administration from 1990 to 1994 for Greenwich Pharmaceuticals, a development
stage company seeking treatments for autoimmune diseases. From 1987 to 1990,
Ms. Murphy held the position of Director of Corporate Communications with
Greenwich Pharmaceuticals. Prior to that, Ms. Murphy held various regional and
national positions with multiple publishing corporations. Ms. Murphy holds a
B.S. degree in Education and Psychology from Northern Arizona University.

Charles W. Ogelsby joined the Company in November 1993 as Controller. He was
elected Corporate Controller in 1994 and Assistant Secretary in 1995. From
1990 until he joined the Company, Mr. Ogelsby served as President of Ogelsby &
Company, a Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania financial consulting firm providing
strategic, operating, financial and accounting services to small companies.
From 1988 through 1990, Mr. Ogelsby was Vice President of Founders Court, a
venture capital firm. Mr. Ogelsby is a Certified Public Accountant and a
member of both the American and Pennsylvania Institutes of Certified Public
Accountants. He holds B.S. and M.B.A. degrees from Temple University.

John D. Rodwell joined the Company in September 1981. He served as Director,
Chemical Research and then as Vice President, Discovery Research, from 1984
until January 1989, at which time he assumed his present

18


responsibilities as Vice President, Research and Development. From 1980 to
1981, Dr. Rodwell was a Research Assistant Professor and, from 1976 to 1980,
he was a postdoctoral fellow, both in the Department of Microbiology at the
University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, where he currently is an
Adjunct Associate Professor in the Department of Microbiology. Dr. Rodwell is
a director and treasurer of the Diversity Biotechnology Consortium located in
Sante Fe, New Mexico, which funds basic research in the area of molecular
diversity. He holds a B.A. degree from the University of Massachusetts, an
M.S. degree in Organic Chemistry from Lowell Technological Institute and a
Ph.D. degree in Biochemistry from the University of California at Los Angeles.

Richard J. Walsh joined the Company in June 1994 as Vice President,
Corporate Development. Mr. Walsh served as Vice President of Biotechnology
Acquisitions for American Cyanamid Company from 1992 to 1994. Prior to that
position, for six years he was Vice President, Product Licensing and
Technology Transfer at The Warner-Lambert Company. From 1967 through 1986, Mr.
Walsh held a variety of domestic and international sales, marketing and
licensing positions within Parke-Davis and its parent, The Warner-Lambert
Company. Mr. Walsh holds a B.S. degree in Pharmacy from the University of
Cincinnati.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

CYTOGEN Common Stock is traded on the NASDAQ National Market under the
trading symbol "CYTO." The table below sets forth the high and low sale prices
for CYTOGEN Common Stock for each of the calendar quarters indicated, as
reported by the NASDAQ National Market.


HIGH LOW
---- ---

1994
First Quarter............................................... 7 3
Second Quarter.............................................. 6 1/2 2 7/8
Third Quarter............................................... 5 3/4 3
Fourth Quarter.............................................. 4 1/4 2 3/8
1995
First Quarter............................................... 5 1/4 3 1/16
Second Quarter.............................................. 5 1/4 2 15/16
Third Quarter............................................... 6 1/2 4 1/4
Fourth Quarter.............................................. 5 15/16 3 17/32


As of February 22, 1996 there were approximately 6,522 holders of record of
the Common Stock.

CYTOGEN has not paid any cash dividends on its Common Stock since its
inception and does not anticipate paying any cash dividends on its Common
Stock in the foreseeable future. Declaration of dividends on the Common Stock
will depend, among other things, upon future earnings, the operating and
financial condition of the Company, its capital requirements, and general
business conditions.

19


ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following selected financial information has been derived from the
financial statements of the Company for each of the five fiscal years in the
period ended December 31, 1995, which have been audited by Arthur Andersen
LLP, the Company's independent public accountants. The financial summaries set
forth below should be read in conjunction with the financial statements,
including the notes thereto, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and other information provided
elsewhere in this report.



1995(1) 1994 1993 1992 1991
-------------------- --------- --------- ---------
(All amounts in thousands, except per share data)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS DATA:
Revenues.............. $ 4,985 $ 2,458 $ 10,354 $ 13,367 $ 7,022
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Research and
development.......... 22,594 20,321 24,844 21,680 21,293
Selling and marketing. 4,493 5,536 9,399 2,679 1,290
Acquisition of
technology and
marketing rights..... 45,878 4,647 -- -- --
General and
administrative....... 4,804 3,962 7,016 5,394 3,612
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Operating expenses.... 77,769 34,466 41,259 29,753 26,195
Loss from operations.. $ (72,784) $ (32,008) $ (30,905) $ (16,386) $ (19,173)
Non-operating income
(expense)............ 264 (798) 1,676 3,447 3,829
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Net loss.............. (72,520) (32,806) (29,229) (12,939) (15,344)
Dividends on preferred
stock................ -- -- -- (1,293) (1,725)
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Net loss to common
stockholders......... $ (72,520) $ (32,806) $ (29,229) $ (14,232) $ (17,069)
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Net loss per common
share................ $ (2.11) $ (1.38) $ (1.38) $ (0.75) $ (0.98)
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Weighted average
common shares
outstanding.......... 34,333 23,822 21,121 18,994 17,345
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEETS DATA:
Cash and short term
investments.......... $ 28,752 $ 7,700 $ 23,764 $ 35,738 $ 54,506
Total assets.......... 37,149 19,690 34,635 52,775 64,471
Long term liabilities. 3,275 4,310 192 276 346
Redeemable preferred
stock................ -- -- -- -- 17,250
Redeemable common
stock................ -- 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000
Stockholders' equity.. 25,276 4,368 21,731 45,411 38,760

- --------
(1) Results of Operations and Balance Sheets Data includes information related
to Cellcor, Inc. for the period beginning October 20, 1995 to December
31,1995.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

From time to time, as used herein, the term "Company" may include CYTOGEN
Corporation ("CYTOGEN") and its wholly-owned subsidiary Cellcor, Inc.
("Cellcor") taken as a whole, where appropriate.

Beginning with 1994, the Company changed from a fiscal year end to a
calendar year end. Previously, the Company operated on a 52-53 week fiscal
year ending on the Saturday nearest to December 31. References below to 1993
relate to the fiscal year ended January 1, 1994.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Background. Historically, CYTOGEN's revenues have resulted primarily from
(i) payments received from the sale of research services pursuant to
collaborative agreements, (ii) fees generated from the licensing of its

20


technology and marketing rights to its products and (iii) product related
revenues on sales of its OncoScint products in the U.S. and Western Europe.

In December 1995, CYTOGEN entered into a research and development and option
agreement (the "Elan Agreement") with Elan Corporation, plc ("Elan") under
which both parties will implement a research program that combines CYTOGEN's
Genetic Diversity Library ("GDL") technology with Elan's drug delivery system
technology to collaboratively develop orally administered products.
Thereunder, Elan has been granted an option for the exclusive worldwide
licensing rights to any products so developed and the Company will receive
royalties based on sales, if any, of such products. Elan will provide the
funding necessary for the Company to fulfill its obligations under the
research program with aggregate payments for work performed by CYTOGEN not to
exceed $1.5 million during the first sixteen months of the research program.

During 1994, because of a contractual dispute between CYTOGEN and CytoRad
Incorporated ("CytoRad"), no contract revenues were recorded by CYTOGEN for
research services performed on behalf of CytoRad, although CYTOGEN continued
with the development of the products licensed to CytoRad. In 1995, CYTOGEN
acquired CytoRad by merging CytoRad with and into a wholly-owned subsidiary of
CYTOGEN. See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. As a result of
the merger, the Company acquired $11.7 million of CytoRad's cash and
securities, before payment of certain transaction costs. In addition, in 1995,
the Company recorded a one-time non-cash charge to the statement of operations
of $19.7 million for the acquisition of technology and marketing rights
pertaining to the merger.

In December 1994, CYTOGEN entered into a license agreement (the "DP/Merck
Agreement") with The DuPont Merck Pharmaceutical Company ("DuPont Merck")
pursuant to which DuPont Merck will have responsibility for manufacturing and
marketing Quadramet in the U.S., if and when approved for marketing by the
U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA"). The Company has retained the right
to co-promote the product to nuclear medicine specialists. Pursuant to the
DP/Merck Agreement, CYTOGEN received from DuPont Merck an up-front cash
payment of $1.0 million in December 1994 and $5.3 million in January 1995, of
which $1.3 million is to fund additional clinical programs to expand the use
and marketing of Quadramet and $4.0 million was to purchase 908,265 shares of
CYTOGEN common stock. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The
New Drug Application ("NDA") for Quadramet was accepted for filing by FDA
effective August 1995. The timing and outcome of FDA's decision regarding
Quadramet cannot be predicted by the Company at this time.

Beginning in July 1994, as a result of the termination of CYTOGEN's
relationship with Knoll Pharmaceuticals Company ("Knoll"), product related
revenues have included product sales by CYTOGEN to its U.S. customers. See
Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Since that date, CYTOGEN has
not recorded any product sales to Knoll or any co-promotion revenues. In
addition, in December 1994, CYTOGEN entered into a disengagement agreement
(the "Disengagement Agreement") with Chiron B.V., formerly EuroCetus B.V.,
successor in interest to EuroCetus International, N.V. ("Chiron") to reacquire
the exclusive marketing and distribution rights to OncoScint CR/OV in Europe
(the "European Rights") previously granted to Chiron. This reacquisition was
consummated in February 1995 and since that date, OncoScint CR/OV has not been
marketed outside the U.S. See Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.

To date, sales of OncoScint CR/OV in both the U.S. and European markets have
been limited, in part, because OncoScint CR/OV is a "technique-dependent"
product that requires a high degree of proficiency in nuclear imaging, as well
as a thorough appreciation of the information the scan can provide. CYTOGEN
believes that sales of OncoScint CR/OV may be increased because of approval by
FDA of repeat administration, which occurred in November 1995, implementation
of better quality control at the time the image is actually acquired, and
through greater assistance with the interpretation of the scans. The approval
of repeat administration extends the prior FDA approval of single
administration indication to include readministration of OncoScint CR/OV to
human anti-mouse antibody-negative patients who are at risk of recurrence of
their cancer. While an important next step for OncoScint, CYTOGEN believes
that sales of OncoScint CR/OV may be only modestly increased because of repeat
administration. CYTOGEN is in the process of establishing a network of
qualified nuclear

21


medicine physicians through its Partners in Excellence or PIE(TM) Program (the
"PIE Program"). The PIE Program includes rigorous training, testing, and
ongoing quality assurance protocols with active support and certification in
conjunction with the American College of Nuclear Physicians. The PIE Program
is being further developed in preparation for the launch of ProstaScint, for
which a Product License Application ("PLA") was accepted as filed by FDA in
March 1995, although the timing and outcome of FDA's decision regarding
ProstaScint cannot be predicted by the Company. In addition, CYTOGEN is
exploring the use of teleradiology to support the PIE Program in order to
allow for improvement of the acquisition and interpretation of both OncoScint
CR/OV and ProstaScint scans. In its strictest form, teleradiology provides
two-way communications by linking an imaging center with an off-site imaging
specialist. The use of teleradiology has advanced due to improvements in
related computer and telecommunication technologies. The Company is also
exploring whether other companies with their own technique-dependent products
would like to participate in the PIE Program, which would allow allocation of
the marketing and sales costs over a number of different products. While there
has been interest in the PIE Program from other companies, there can be no
assurance that CYTOGEN can attract other products to the PIE Program, that
this marketing strategy will be successful or that product related revenues
will increase markedly.

In December 1995 and January 1996, CYTOGEN entered into agreements with
Faulding (Canada) Inc. ("Faulding") and CIS biointernational ("CISbio"),
respectively, to market and distribute OncoScint CR/OV outside the U.S.
Faulding is currently pursuing the necessary regulatory approvals in Canada.
CISbio has advised the Company that it expects to relaunch OncoScint CR/OV
during 1996 in eight Western European countries and four Eastern European
countries where the product has been approved for marketing.

In October 1995, CYTOGEN completed its acquisition of Cellcor by merging
Cellcor with and into a wholly-owned subsidiary of CYTOGEN. See Note 2 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements. Cellcor is a biotechnology company focused
on the development and commercialization of autolymphocyte therapy ("ALT"), a
proprietary immunotherapy using a patient's own white blood cells to augment
the immune system and thereby treat cancer and certain infectious diseases. In
the fourth quarter of 1995, Cellcor completed patient accrual for its Phase
III pivotal clinical trial using ALT to treat metastatic kidney cancer
patients. The study will conclude in the fourth quarter of 1996. If results
from the trial are favorable and FDA concurs, the Company expects to proceed
with the submission of a PLA in the first half of 1997. There can be no
assurance regarding the results of the study or the timing or outcome of FDA's
review. Cellcor is also conducting a Phase III human clinical study in post-
surgical patients with non-metastatic kidney cancer with high risk of
recurring disease to examine the effect of ALT in delaying progression to
metastatic disease. ALT is also in Phase I/II development as a treatment for
chronic hepatitis B. No prediction can be made, however, as to when or whether
such trials will lead to new commercial products.

Cellcor has received FDA approval to proceed with a Treatment IND that
allows ALT to be available as a treatment option for patients who have no
satisfactory alternative therapy to treat their metastatic kidney cancer. The
Treatment IND also allows the Company to recover costs associated with the
treatment. ALT will be available through the Treatment IND while the Company
continues to pursue FDA approval of ALT. As a result of the Cellcor merger,
beginning October 1995, the Company's product related revenues included the
cost recovery related to the treatment of patients receiving ALT under a
compassionate protocol. In addition, the Company recorded a one-time non-cash
charge to the statement of operations of approximately $26.2 million for
acquisition of Cellcor technology rights.

Revenues. Total revenues were $5.0 million in 1995, $2.5 million in 1994 and
$10.4 million in 1993. Product related revenues were $1.4 million in 1995 and
consisted primarily of domestic sales of OncoScint CR/OV. In 1994, product
related revenues from sales of OncoScint CR/OV were $1.4 million and included
domestic sales of $1.2 million, Western European sales of $162,000 and a
$109,000 reduction for returns of OncoScint CR/OV inventory because of shelf
life expiration. In 1993, product related revenues were $1.6 million,
including domestic sales of $1.4 million and Western European sales of
$164,000.


22


License and contract revenues for 1995, 1994, and 1993 were $3.6 million,
$1.0 million and $8.8 million, respectively, and included milestone payments
of $2.1 million in 1995, $1.0 million in 1994 and $2.0 million in 1993. The
1995 milestone payments consisted primarily of $2.0 million from The Dow
Chemical Company ("Dow"), which was received upon the Company's filing of the
NDA with FDA. In 1994, CYTOGEN received a $1.0 million milestone payment from
DuPont Merck upon its entering into an agreement with CYTOGEN to manufacture
and market Quadramet in the U.S. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements. In 1993, CYTOGEN received a milestone payment of $2.0 million from
CytoRad as a one-time licensing fee for rights to CYTOGEN's ovarian cancer
radiotherapy product and related technology. Revenues from the sale of
research services were $1.5 million in 1995 compared to $47,000 in 1994 and
$6.8 million in 1993. The decrease in 1995 and 1994 from 1993 is attributable
primarily to the absence of contract revenues from CytoRad. The 1995 contract
revenues consisted primarily of $1.3 million realized from DuPont Merck for
continued clinical development of Quadramet. In 1994, CYTOGEN recorded an
aggregate of $47,000 of contract revenues from Bracco (defined below) and
Chiron. In 1993, CYTOGEN recorded $5.9 million of contract revenues from
CytoRad in addition to the licensing fee from CytoRad and $900,000 from Bracco
as defined below.

Operating Expenses. Total operating expenses were $77.8 million in 1995,
$34.5 million in 1994, and $41.3 million in 1993. The increase of $43.3
million from 1994 to 1995 is largely attributable to the one-time non-cash
charges of $45.9 million recorded in 1995 for acquisition of technology and
marketing rights from CytoRad and Cellcor, compared to the $4.6 million in
charges recorded in 1994 for acquisition of marketing and technology rights
from Knoll, Chiron, and CytoRad. In addition, in 1995, the Company recorded a
$2.9 million charge for inventory writedowns of commercial inventory relating
to OncoScint CR/OV, compared to a $1.1 million charge in 1994. The 1995 and
1994 spending levels, excluding the above mentioned one-time charges, are
relatively the same but below the 1993 level, reflecting the Company's
objective to control spending and to focus its efforts on its highest priority
products and technology, which are (i) OncoScint CR/OV, (ii) Quadramet, (iii)
ProstaScint, (iv) the GDL technology and (v) ALT therapy for mRCC.

Research and development expenses were $22.6 million in 1995, $20.3 million
in 1994 and $24.8 million in 1993. These expenses principally reflect product
development efforts and support for various ongoing clinical trials and in
1995, included costs incurred in connection with the submissions of the PLA
for ProstaScint and NDA for Quadramet. During 1995, 1994, and 1993, the
Company charged $2.9 million, $1.1 million and $2.3 million, respectively, to
research and development expenses for inventory writedowns of commercial
inventory relating to OncoScint CR/OV.

Selling and marketing expenses were $4.5 million in 1995, $5.5 million in
1994 and $9.4 million in 1993. The decrease from the prior year periods is
primarily attributable to the reduction of promotional expenses associated
with OncoScint CR/OV and in 1995, included the reduction of salaries and
employee related expenses that resulted from the restructuring of CYTOGEN's
sales force.

Acquisition of technology and marketing rights expenses were $45.9 million
in 1995 and included $19.7 million and $26.2 million of one-time non-cash
charges representing the amounts by which the purchase prices exceeded the
fair value of net assets acquired in connection with the CytoRad and Cellcor
mergers, respectively. In 1994, CYTOGEN recorded $4.6 million for acquisition
of technology and marketing rights, which included $2.4 million and $800,000
of one-time charges for the acquisition of marketing rights to OncoScint CR/OV
from Knoll and Chiron, respectively, and $1.4 million of legal and investment
banking fees related to the CytoRad merger.

General and administrative expenses were $4.8 million in 1995, $4.0 million
in 1994 and $7.0 million in 1993. The decrease in 1995 and 1994 from 1993 is
largely due to a reserve established in 1993 for the settlement of a class
action securities lawsuit (see Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements) and to reduced spending for general legal and corporate
communication.

Other Income/Expense. Net gain on investments for 1995 was $857,000 compared
to a net loss of $470,000 in 1994 and a net gain of $1.7 million in 1993. The
net loss in 1994 is attributable primarily to a

23


$1.5 million loss recorded in 1994 as a result of the sale of government
securities due to the rise in interest rates. This loss was partially offset
by interest income of approximately $1.0 million in 1994. The lower net gain
on investments in 1995 when compared to 1993 is due primarily to lower average
cash and short term investment balances for the period. Imputed interest
expense on liabilities associated with CYTOGEN's termination agreements with
Knoll and Chiron was $593,000 in 1995 compared to $328,000 in 1994.

Net Loss. Net losses were $72.5 million, $32.8 million and $29.2 million in
1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively. Losses per share were $2.11, $1.38 and
$1.38 in 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively, on 34.3 million, 23.8 million and
21.1 million average shares outstanding in each year, respectively. As
discussed above, the increase in 1995 from 1994 and 1993 in the net loss and
net loss per common share is primarily attributable to the charges to the
statement of operations for the acquisition of technology and marketing
rights. At December 31, 1995, the Company had outstanding (i) options to
purchase up to 3.0 million shares of CYTOGEN common stock under its various
stock option plans with exercise prices ranging from $2.69 to $17.00 per
share; (ii) warrants to purchase 4.3 million shares of CYTOGEN common stock
with exercise prices ranging from $8.00 to $18.87 per share; (iii) contingent
value rights ("CVRs") to receive, under certain circumstances, up to 2.0
million shares of CYTOGEN common stock (which CVRs terminated in February
1996); (iv) the put right to issue and sell to a private institutional
investor that number of shares of common stock equal to $5.0 million divided
by a formula purchase price per share; and (v) the put right to issue and sell
to Fletcher Fund (defined below) up to 675,000 shares of CYTOGEN common stock,
subject to adjustment. The loss per share calculation stated above does not
take into account the shares issuable in connection with such options,
warrants, CVRs and put rights as their effect is antidilutive.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Company's cash and short term investments were $28.8 million as of
December 31, 1995, compared to $7.7 million as of December 31, 1994. The cash
used for operating activities was $25.7 million in 1995 compared to $27.7
million in 1994, reflecting a continued commitment by the Company to control
spending. Cash used for purchases of property and equipment was $600,000 in
1995 compared to $2.8 million in 1994 reflecting the 1994 capital expenditures
associated with the project to create additional manufacturing capacity to
produce the antibodies used with ProstaScint.

Historically, the Company's primary sources of cash have been proceeds from
the issuance and sale of its stock through public offerings and private
placements, product related revenues, the sale of research services, fees paid
under its license agreements and interest earned on its cash and short term
investments.

CYTOGEN Common Stock. In January 1995, the Company received from DuPont
Merck $4.0 million from the sale of 908,265 shares of CYTOGEN common stock.

In September 1995, CYTOGEN and Fletcher Fund L.P. ("Fletcher Fund") entered
into an investment agreement (the "Investment Agreement") pursuant to which
CYTOGEN (i) sold to Fletcher Fund 665,352 shares of CYTOGEN common stock in
September 1995 for an aggregate purchase price of $2.7 million, and (ii) will
have the right, during the period beginning October 13, 1995 and ending March
29, 1996, to issue and sell to Fletcher Fund, and Fletcher Fund will be
obligated to purchase, up to 675,000 shares of CYTOGEN common stock from time
to time at a purchase price per share equal to 101% of the average of the
daily volume weighted average price of CYTOGEN common stock on NASDAQ during a
designated twenty-one business day period. Under certain circumstances,
Fletcher Fund will have the right to decrease or increase the number of shares
of CYTOGEN common stock to be purchased in connection with the exercise of a
put right by CYTOGEN, but in no event shall the total number of shares sold by
CYTOGEN and purchased by Fletcher Fund pursuant to the Investment Agreement
exceed 4.9% of the total number of shares of CYTOGEN common stock outstanding,
after giving effect to the proposed sale and purchase of the shares in
question. The shares to be issued and sold in this transaction were registered
pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission in April 1994.


24


In October 1995, CYTOGEN acquired Cellcor by merging Cellcor with and into a
wholly-owned subsidiary of CYTOGEN. In connection with a subscription offering
to Cellcor common stockholders, the Company raised an aggregate of $20.0
million, before certain transaction costs. See Note 2 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements.

In November 1995, the Company sold 1,256,565 shares of common stock to a
private institutional investor in a private placement transaction pursuant to
Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for an aggregate price
of $5.0 million and, in connection therewith, the Company was granted the
right to put to that private institutional investor, until March 31, 1996,
that number of shares equal to $5.0 million divided by a formula purchase
price (the "Put Purchase Price"). The Put Purchase Price is equal to 0.925
multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the sum of the closing
prices reported on the Nasdaq National Market ("NASDAQ") for the CYTOGEN
common stock for each trading day during a twenty-one day pricing period, and
the denominator of which is the number of trading days in the pricing period.

In 1995 and the first quarter of 1996, Fletcher Capital Markets, Inc.
("Fletcher") purchased an aggregate of 3.3 million shares of CYTOGEN common
stock at an aggregate price of approximately $14.3 million, at prices ranging
from $4.058 to $4.70 per share, under an option agreement (the "Option")
granted to Fletcher in May 1994, as amended. See Note 13 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements.

CYTOGEN entered into a research and option agreement (the "Bracco
Agreement") with Bracco Industria Chimica S.p.A ("Bracco") in September 1989,
pursuant to which Bracco purchased 250,000 shares of CYTOGEN common stock (the
"Bracco Shares") at $8.00 per share. The Bracco Agreement provided that
CYTOGEN would be obligated to repurchase the Bracco Shares from Bracco under
certain circumstances for an aggregate purchase price of $2.0 million (the
"Purchase Price"). In August 1995, CYTOGEN and Bracco agreed that Bracco would
sell the Bracco Shares on NASDAQ and Bracco sold the Bracco Shares for an
aggregate share sales price ("Share Sales Price") of $1,375,000, or $5.50 per
share. At that date, Bracco had an outstanding payable due and owing to
CYTOGEN in an amount equal to $293,408 (the "Payable"). CYTOGEN also agreed to
pay to Bracco the amount equal to the difference between (i) the Purchase
Price and (ii) the sum of the Share Sales Price plus the Payable (or
$331,592), in full settlement of the issue, which amount has been paid.

The Company and Nomura Securities International, Inc. ("Nomura") executed an
agreement effective as of February 23, 1996 that terminated the Purchase
Agreement between CYTOGEN and Nomura dated March 28, 1995. Under that
agreement, CYTOGEN could have sold shares of its common stock to Nomura for
distribution in the public markets. CYTOGEN had filed a Registration Statement
on Form S-3 with the Securities Exchange Commission in 1995, which
registration statement was never declared effective. No sales of stock
occurred under the terms of the agreement. Because of certain regulatory
requirements governing the transaction, the structure of the transaction and
its implementation as originally contemplated by the parties and as set forth
in the agreement were required to be substantially revised. The parties agreed
that it was not in their respective best interests to proceed with the
transaction under the terms as so revised and therefore, agreed to terminate
the agreement. CYTOGEN has also filed an application with the SEC for
withdrawal of the registration statement.

Product Related Revenues. CYTOGEN has recorded product related revenues from
the sales of its OncoScint Colorectal product in Europe since 1992 and from
sales of OncoScint CR/OV in the U.S. since January 1993. To date, sales have
not been significant and are not expected to become a significant source of
cash flow in 1996. In anticipation of the execution of the Termination
Agreement (defined below), as of May 20, 1994, Knoll ceased its selling
efforts and since that date, CYTOGEN's direct sales force has been the sole
marketer in the U.S. of OncoScint CR/OV. Beginning in July 1994, product
related revenues have included direct product sales by CYTOGEN to its U.S.
customers. Since that date, CYTOGEN has not recorded any product sales to
Knoll or any co-promotion revenues. In May 1995, CYTOGEN announced its initial
implementation of the PIE Program described above. Depending on the success of
the PIE Program, significant resources might be required. There can be no
assurance this marketing strategy will be successful.


25


In November 1994, the Company executed a termination agreement with Knoll
(the "Termination Agreement"). The Termination Agreement requires the Company
to pay to Knoll, over a four-year period and without interest, $3.0 million to
reacquire the U.S. Rights and $5.0 million of liabilities previously incurred
under the terms of a license, supply and marketing agreement executed in
December 1991 (the "Knoll Agreement"). The payment of these liabilities will
be made as follows: $3.1 million in 1995, which amount has been paid; $1.6
million in 1996; $1.6 million in 1997; and $1.7 million in 1998. See Note 6 to
the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In December 1994, CYTOGEN entered into the Disengagement Agreement with
Chiron to reacquire the European Rights and purchase certain business assets
relating to the European Rights. The resulting liability of CYTOGEN to Chiron,
which consisted of the reacquisition price of $1.0 million, was partially
offset by a $127,000 receivable from Chiron, and will be paid over three years
and without interest, as follows: $200,000 in 1995, which amount has been
paid; $300,000 in 1996; and $377,000 in 1997. Payment is secured by a mortgage
covering approximately 11 acres of undeveloped real property owned by the
Company in Ewing, New Jersey. This obligation is non-recourse to the Company.
See Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In December 1995 and January 1996, CYTOGEN entered into agreements with
Faulding and CISbio, respectively, to market and distribute OncoScint CR/OV
outside the U.S. Faulding is currently pursuing the necessary regulatory
approvals in Canada. CISbio has advised the Company that it expects to
relaunch OncoScint CR/OV during 1996 in eight Western European countries and
four Eastern European countries where the product is approved for marketing.
In addition to one-time cash payments made upon execution of the agreements,
each of Faulding and CISbio will be required to make a payment upon the
achievement of a milestone, payments for the purchase of products and
royalties on net sales, if any.

Beginning October 1995, as a result of the Cellcor merger, the Company's
product related revenues included the cost recovery related to the treatment
of patients receiving ALT under a compassionate protocol, and will include the
cost recovery associated with the Treatment IND.

Research Services and Licenses. In December 1994, CYTOGEN entered into a
license agreement with DuPont Merck. Pursuant to the terms of the DP/Merck
Agreement, CYTOGEN received from DuPont Merck an up-front cash payment of $1.0
million in December 1994 and $1.3 million in January 1995 to fund additional
clinical programs to expand the use and marketing of Quadramet. The DP/Merck
Agreement further provides for future payments of up to $2.9 million towards
additional clinical programs, a $2.0 million milestone payment if and when
Quadramet receives FDA approval and royalty payments based on sales, including
guaranteed minimum payments.

In February 1995, CYTOGEN acquired CytoRad by merging CytoRad with and into
a wholly-owned subsidiary of CYTOGEN. As a result of the merger, the Company
will not recognize any further research contract revenues from CytoRad and
$11.7 million of CytoRad's cash and securities, before payment of certain
transaction costs, were acquired by the Company. See Note 5 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.

CYTOGEN acquired an exclusive license in the U.S. from Dow for Quadramet in
1993. See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. In the third
quarter of 1995, upon the filing of the NDA for Quadramet with FDA, CYTOGEN
recorded a one-time licensing fee of $2.0 million from Dow for its use of the
Quadramet NDA filing package. At the same time, CYTOGEN was required to pay to
Dow $1.0 million, which amount was offset against the $2.0 million payment
from Dow. In addition, the Company will be required to pay to Dow $4.0 million
if and when Quadramet receives FDA approval. The agreement provides for
additional payments by the Company upon achievement of certain milestones and
royalties on net sales of the product once commercialized, including
guaranteed minimum payments.

In December 1995, the Company and Elan entered into the Elan Agreement,
under which Elan will provide the funding necessary for the Company to fulfill
its obligations under the research program with aggregate

26


payments for work performed by CYTOGEN not to exceed $1.5 million during the
first sixteen months of the research program.

The Company's capital and operating requirements, as described above, may
further change depending upon several factors, including: (i) the amount of
resources which the Company devotes to clinical evaluations and the
establishment of manufacturing, marketing and sales capabilities; (ii) results
of preclinical testing, clinical trials and research and development
activities; and (iii) competitive and technological developments. The Company
plans to continue to control spending and expects that its existing cash and
short term investments of $28.8 million at December 31, 1995, together with
other financing and acquisition opportunities which may become available
(including sales of stock pursuant to the put rights described above), and the
receipt of additional funds from DuPont Merck and Elan in accordance with the
terms of the DP/Merck Agreement and Elan Agreement, respectively, will be
adequate to support the Company's operations into 1997.

The Company's financial strategy is to meet its capital and operating
requirements through revenues from existing products, the establishment of
strategic marketing alliances and research and development partnerships, the
acquisition, in-licensing and development of other technologies, products or
services, subcontract manufacturing revenues, license and contract revenues,
sale of equity securities as market conditions permit, interest income, and a
continued commitment to control spending. This strategy may increase short
term expenses and, if successful, increase long term revenues. In addition,
certain of these transactions are likely to require payments by the Company in
either cash or stock in addition to the costs associated with developing and
marketing any product or technology. There can be no assurance as to the
strategy's success or that any resulting funds will be sufficient to meet the
Company's cash requirements through the time that product related resources
are sufficient to cover the Company's operating expenses.

The foregoing discussion contains historical information as well as forward
looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. In
addition to the risks discussed above, among other factors that could cause
actual results to differ materially from expected results are the following:
(i) the ability of the Company to maintain any development schedules; (ii) the
results of clinical studies; (iii) market acceptance of the Company's
products, including programs designed to facilitate use of the products, such
as the PIE Program and the use of teleradiology; (iv) the profitability of its
products; (v) the ability to attract, and the ultimate success of strategic
partnering arrangements, collaborations, and acquisition candidates; (vi) the
ability of the Company and its partners to identify new products as a result
of those collaborations that are capable of achieving FDA approval, that are
cost-effective alternatives to existing products and that are ultimately
accepted by the key users of the product; (vii) the success of the Company's
distributors in obtaining marketing approvals in Canada and in additional
European countries, in achieving milestones and achieving sales of products
resulting in royalties; and (viii) the Company's ability to access the capital
markets in the future for continued funding of existing projects and for the
pursuit of new projects.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The response to Item 8 is submitted as a separate section of this Form 10-K.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

27


PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

Information regarding the Company's Directors is incorporated by reference
to the information contained under the captions "Nominees for Directors" and
"Security Ownership of Management and Principal Stockholders" in the Company's
Proxy Statement. One of the Company's Directors, Bruce R. Ross, is not
included in the Proxy Statement because he has advised the Company of his
decision not to stand for re-election at the Company's 1996 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders. Information concerning Mr. Ross is set forth below. Information
regarding the Company's Executive Officers is set forth in Part I of this Form
10-K and incorporated by reference to the information contained under the
caption "Security Ownership of Management and Principal Stockholders" in the
Company's Proxy Statement.

Bruce R. Ross, 55, has served as a director of the Company since April 1994.
Mr. Ross was a Senior Vice President of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company's
Pharmaceutical Group until his retirement on March 31, 1994. He joined
Bristol-Myers in 1967 and progressed through a variety of staff and line
management positions in Syracuse, New York; Evansville, Indiana; New York, New
York; and most recently, Princeton, New Jersey. He had responsibility for
Bristol-Myers Squibb's domestic pharmaceutical operations and the development
of its oncology business. Prior to joining Bristol-Myers Squibb, he worked as
a researcher in the field of cancer at Upstate Medical Center in Syracuse, New
York. Mr. Ross is a member of the Board of Directors of Sugen, Inc. and of the
Fox Chase Cancer Center in Philadelphia, is actively involved with the
American Cancer Society, and is the Chief Executive Officer of the National
Comprehensive Cancer Network. He holds a B.S. degree in Microbiology from
Syracuse University.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Incorporated by reference to the information contained under the caption
"Executive Compensation" in the Company's Proxy Statement.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

Incorporated by reference to the information contained under the caption
"Security Ownership of Management and Principal Stockholders" in the Company's
Proxy Statement.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Incorporated by reference to the information contained under the captions
"Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation" and "Certain
Transactions" in the Company's Proxy Statement.

28


PART IV

ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a) Documents filed as a part of the Report:

(1) and (2)

The response to this portion of Item 14 is submitted as a separate section
of this Form 10-K.

(3) Exhibits--Each management contract or compensatory plan or
arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit hereto pursuant to Item
14(c) of this report is listed in Exhibit Nos. 10.8.1, 10.8.2, 10.8.3,
10.9.1, 10.9.2, 10.9.3, 10.23, 10.26, 10.34 and 10.35 below.



EXHIBIT
NO.
-------

2.1 --Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated November 15, 1994 among the
registrant, CytoRad Acquisition Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of
the registrant, and CytoRad Incorporated.(17)
2.2.1 --Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated June 15, 1995 among the
registrant, Cellcor Acquisition Corp. (formerly known as Small-C
Acquisition Corp.), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the registrant, and
Cellcor, Inc.(20)
2.2.2 --First Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated September 7,
1995 by and among the registrant, Cellcor Acquisition Corp. and
Cellcor, Inc.(23)
3.1 --Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended.(14)
3.2 --By-Laws of CYTOGEN Corporation, as amended.(14)
4.1 --Specimen of Common Stock Certificate.(5)
4.2 --Specimen of Warrant Certificate to purchase CYTOGEN Corporation
Common Stock, issued to stockholders of CytoRad Incorporated.(11)
4.3 --Specimen of Unit Certificate.(11)
4.4 --Form of Warrant Agreement, including form of warrant, exercisable
through January 31, 1997, to purchase 1.0 share of CYTOGEN
Corporation Common Stock at $8.00 per share.(14)
10.1 --Voting and Subscription Agreement, dated June 15, 1995 among the
registrant, Cellcor Acquisition Corp. and the entities listed on
Schedule I thereto.(21)
10.2 --Form of Registration Rights Agreement for Common Stock between
CYTOGEN Corporation and certain persons listed on Schedule A
thereto.(22)
10.3.1 --Agreement effective as of June 2, 1983 between American Cyanamid
Company and CYTOGEN Corporation.(1)
10.3.2 --First Amendment dated January 29, 1985 to License Agreement between
American Cyanamid Company and CYTOGEN Corporation.(1)
10.4.1 --Non-Exclusive License Agreement dated April 24, 1989 between Eli
Lilly and Company and CYTOGEN Corporation.(7)
10.4.2 --Non-Exclusive License Agreement dated April 24, 1989 between Eli
Lilly and Company S.A. and CYTOGEN Corporation.(7)
10.4.3 --Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 22, 1989, between Eli
Lilly and Company and CYTOGEN Corporation.(6)
10.5.1 --Production and Supply Agreement, dated September 29, 1989, between
CYTOGEN Corporation and Celltech Limited.(10)


29




EXHIBIT
NO.
-------

10.5.2 --Amendment No. 1 to the Production and Supply Agreement, dated
September 15, 1991, between CYTOGEN Corporation and Celltech
Limited.(11)*
10.5.3 --Agreement, dated November 7, 1991, between CYTOGEN Corporation and
Celltech Limited (the "Celltech Agreement").(11)*
10.5.4 --Amendment No. 3 to the Production and Supply Agreement, dated
January 9, 1992, between CYTOGEN Corporation and Celltech
Limited.(13)*
10.5.5 --Amendment No. 4 to the Production and Supply Agreement, dated
January 9, 1992, between CYTOGEN Corporation and Celltech
Limited.(13)*
10.5.6 --Amendment No. 5 to the Production and Supply Agreement, dated March
10, 1992, between CYTOGEN Corporation and Celltech Limited.(13)*
10.5.7 --Amendment No. 1 to the Celltech Agreement, dated March 9, 1992,
between CYTOGEN Corporation and Celltech Limited.(13)*
10.6.1 --Equipment Lease Agreement dated as of June 28, 1988, between MNC
Leasing Corporation and CYTOGEN Corporation.(3)
10.6.2 --Equipment Lease Agreement Assignment to General Electric Capital
Corporation, dated December 20, 1990, from MNC Leasing
Corporation.(9)
10.7.1 --Lease Agreement, dated as of March 16, 1987, by and between
Peregrine Investment Partners I, as lessor, and CYTOGEN Corporation,
as lessee.(2)
10.7.2 --Amendment, dated as of October 16, 1987, to Lease Agreement between
Peregrine Investment Partners I and CYTOGEN Corporation.(4)
10.7.3 --Lease Agreement, dated November 14, 1989 between College Road
Associates, Limited Partnership and CYTOGEN Corporation.(10)
10.7.4 --Lease Agreement, dated as of February 20, 1986, between College Road
Associates and CYTOGEN Corporation, as amended on June 27, 1986.(8)
10.7.5 --Lease Agreement, dated as of December 23, 1981, by and between The
Trustees of Princeton University and CYTOGEN Corporation, as amended
on March 27, 1986.(8)
10.7.6 --Lease Agreement, dated as of November 26, 1991, between College Road
Associates, Limited Partnership and CYTOGEN Corporation.(11)
10.8.1 --1989 Employee Stock Option Plan.(4)
10.8.2 --CYTOGEN Corporation Standard Form Employee Executive Officer
Incentive Stock Option Agreement.(9)
10.8.3 --CYTOGEN Corporation Standard Form Employee Executive Officer Non-
Qualified Stock Option Agreement.(9)
10.9.1 --1988 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors.(4)
10.9.2 --CYTOGEN Corporation Standard Form Non-Employee Director Non-
Qualified Stock Option Agreement.(9)
10.9.3 --CYTOGEN Corporation Standard Form 1992 Employee Non-Qualified Stock
Option Agreement.(13)
10.10 --Standard Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between
CYTOGEN Corporation and its officers, directors, and consultants.(6)
10.11 --1989 Stock Option Policy for Outside Consultants.(6)


30




EXHIBIT
NO.
-------

10.12 --Stock Purchase Option Agreement, dated February 13, 1992, among
CYTOGEN Corporation, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith
Incorporated, Shearson Lehman Brothers, and certain other parties as
underwriters.(11)
10.13 --Agreement, dated as of December 31, 1992, by and among CYTOGEN
Corporation, Unilever N.V., Unilever PLC, Unilever UK Central
Resources Ltd. and Unipath Ltd.(13)*
10.14 --License Agreement dated as of March 31, 1993 between CYTOGEN
Corporation and The Dow Chemical Company.(12)*
10.15 --Investment Agreement dated as of February 24, 1994 between CYTOGEN
Corporation and Fletcher Capital Markets, Inc.(18)
10.16.1 --Amended and Restated Investment Agreement, dated as of May 6, 1994,
between CYTOGEN Corporation and Fletcher Capital Markets, Inc.(15)
10.16.2 --Amendment to the Option Agreement between CYTOGEN Corporation and
Fletcher Capital Markets, Inc. dated August 10, 1995.(22)
10.16.3 --Second Amendment to the Option Agreement between CYTOGEN Corporation
and Fletcher Capital Markets, Inc. dated November 15, 1995.
10.17 --License Agreement by and between CYTOGEN Corporation and The DuPont
Merck Pharmaceutical Company.(14)*
10.18 --Agreement to Terminate License, Supply and Marketing Agreement,
dated as of November 1, 1994, between CYTOGEN Corporation and Knoll
Pharmaceutical Company.(14)
10.19 --Order Fulfillment Agreement, dated as of November 1, 1994, between
CYTOGEN Corporation and Knoll Pharmaceutical Company.(14)
10.20 --Letter Agreement, dated November 1, 1994, between CYTOGEN
Corporation and Knoll Pharmaceutical Company.(14)
10.21 --Disengagement Agreement, dated December 30, 1994, between CYTOGEN
Corporation and Chiron B.V.(14)*
10.22 --1992 CYTOGEN Corporation Employee Stock Option Plan II, as
amended.(14)
10.23 --Stock Compensation and Performance Option Agreement, dated December
8, 1994, between CYTOGEN Corporation and Dr. Thomas J. McKearn.(14)
10.24 --License Agreement, dated March 10, 1993, between CYTOGEN Corporation
and The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, as amended.(19)*
10.25 --Option and License Agreement, dated July 1, 1993, between CYTOGEN
Corporation and Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research.(19)*
10.26 --Description of Arrangement with Somerset Central Corporation.
10.27 --Investment Agreement between CYTOGEN Corporation and Fletcher Fund
L.P. dated September 8, 1995.(22)
10.28 --Technology Licensing and Service Agreement, dated March 14, 1994,
between Cellcor, Inc. and SRL, Inc.(16)
10.29 --Lease Agreement between Cellcor, Inc. and Leon H. Cohen, Trustee of
200 Wells Avenue Realty Trust, dated January 31, 1990, as
amended.(24)
10.30 --CYTOGEN Corporation 1995 Stock Option Plan.
10.31 --Research and Development and Option Agreement, dated December 14,
1995, between CYTOGEN Corporation and Elan Corporation, plc.**


31




EXHIBIT
NO.
-------

10.32 --Distribution Agreement, dated December 22, 1995, between CYTOGEN
Corporation and Faulding (Canada) Inc.**
10.33 --Distribution Agreement, dated January 16, 1996, between CYTOGEN
Corporation and CIS biointernational.**
10.34 --Severance Agreement effective as of January 1, 1994 between CYTOGEN
Corporation and Thomas J. McKearn, M.D., Ph.D.
10.35 --Description of Severance Agreement with Richard J. Walsh.
10.36 --Horosziewicz-CYTOGEN Agreement, dated April 20, 1989, between
CYTOGEN Corporation and Julius S. Horosziewicz, M.D., DMSe.**
21 --Subsidiaries of CYTOGEN Corporation.
23 --Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP.
27 --Financial Data Schedule (submitted to SEC only in electronic
format).
99 --Standard Form of Confidentiality Agreement (as executed by all
officers and employees).(2)

- --------
(1) Filed as an exhibit to Form S-l Registration Statement (No. 35-5533) and
incorporated herein by reference.
(2) Filed as an exhibit to Form 10-K Annual Report for Year Ended January 2,
1988 (Commission File No. 0-14879) and incorporated herein by reference.
(3) Filed as an exhibit to Form 10-K Annual Report for Year Ended December
31, 1988 (Commission File No. 0-14879) and incorporated herein by
reference.
(4) Filed as an exhibit to Form S-8 Registration Statement (No. 33-30595) and
incorporated herein by reference.
(5) Filed as an exhibit to Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1 Registration Statement
(No. 33-5533) and incorporated herein by reference.
(6) Filed as an exhibit to Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1 Registration Statement
(No. 33-31280) and incorporated herein by reference.
(7) Filed as an exhibit to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Form S-1
Registration Statement (No. 33-31280) and incorporated herein by
reference.
(8) Filed as an exhibit to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1
Registration Statement (No. 33-35430) and incorporated herein by
reference.
(9) Filed as an exhibit to Form 10-K Annual Report for the Year Ended
December 29, 1990 (Commission File No. 0-14879) and incorporated herein
by reference.
(10) Filed as an exhibit to Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K Annual Report for the
Year Ended December 29, 1990 (Commission File No. 0-14879) and
incorporated herein by reference.
(11) Filed as an exhibit to Form 10-K Annual Report for the Year Ended
December 28, 1991 (Commission File No. 0-14879) and incorporated herein
by reference.
(12) Filed as an exhibit to Form 10-Q/A-1 Amendment to Quarterly Report for
the quarter ended July 3, 1993 (Commission File No. 0-14879) and
incorporated herein by reference.
(13) Filed as an exhibit to Form 10-K Annual Report for the Year Ended January
2, 1993 (Commission File No. 0-14879) and incorporated herein by
reference.
(14) Filed as an exhibit to Form S-4 Registration Statement (No. 33-88612) and
incorporated herein by reference.
(15) Filed as an exhibit to Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the quarter ended
March 31, 1994 (Commission File No. 0-14879), as amended, and
incorporated herein by reference.
(16) Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Cellcor, Inc.'s Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for
the quarter ended March 31, 1994 (Commission File No. 0-19823) and
incorporated herein by reference.
(17) Filed as an exhibit to Form 8-K dated November 15, 1994 (Commission File
No. 0-14879) and incorporated herein by reference.
(18) Filed as an exhibit to Form 10-K Annual Report for the Year Ended January
1, 1994 (Commission File No. 0-14879) and incorporated herein by
reference.

32


(19) Filed as an exhibit to Form 10-K Annual Report for the Year Ended
December 31, 1994 (Commission File No. 0-14879) and incorporated herein
by reference.
(20) Filed as an exhibit to Form 8-K dated June 15, 1995 (Commission File No.
0-14879) and incorporated herein by reference.
(21) Filed as Annex B to the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus dated July 17,
1995 and incorporated herein by reference.
(22) Filed as an exhibit to Form S-4 Registration Statement (No. 33-62617) and
incorporated herein by reference.
(23) Filed as Annex A to the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus constituting
part of the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 33-62617) and
incorporated herein by reference.
(24) Filed as Exhibit 10.09 to Cellcor, Inc.'s Form S-1 Registration Statement
(No. 33-45448) and incorporated herein by reference.
* CYTOGEN Corporation has received confidential treatment of certain
provisions contained in this exhibit pursuant to an order issued by the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The copy filed as an exhibit omits the
information subject to the confidentiality grant.
** CYTOGEN Corporation has requested confidential treatment of certain
provisions contained in this exhibit. The copy filed as an exhibit omits
the information subject to the confidentiality request.

(b) Reports on Form 8-K:

The Company filed two Reports on Form 8-K during the fourth quarter of
1995 and the dates of such reports were October 16, 1995 and October 20,
1995. The Form 8-K dated October 16, 1995 reported on "Item 5. Other
Events" with respect to a press release announcing the results of the
special stockholders' meeting. The Form 8-K dated October 20, 1995 reported
on "Item 2. Acquisition or Disposition of Assets" regarding the completion
of the acquisition of Cellcor pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger
and filed therein were the following financial statements: (a) Cellcor
Audited Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1994 and 1993, Statements of
Operations for the three years ended December 31, 1994, Statements of Cash
Flows for the three years ended December 31, 1994, Statements of
Stockholders' Equity for the three years ended December 31, 1994 and
related Notes to Financial Statements; (b) Cellcor Unaudited Balance Sheet
as of June 30, 1995, Statements of Operations for six months ended June 30,
1995 and 1994, Statements of Cash Flows for six months ended June 30, 1995
and 1994 and related Notes to Financial Statements; and (c) CYTOGEN and
Subsidiaries Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Balance Sheet as of
June 30, 1995, Statements of Operation for the year ended December 31, 1995
and for the six months ended June 30, 1995 and related Notes to Financial
Statements.

(c) Exhibits:

The Exhibits filed with this Form 10-K are listed above in response to
Item 14(a)(3).

(d) Financial Statement Schedules:

The response to this portion of Item 14 is submitted as a separate section
of this Form 10-K.


33


SIGNATURES

PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, THE REGISTRANT HAS DULY CAUSED THIS REPORT TO BE SIGNED
ON ITS BEHALF BY THE UNDERSIGNED, THEREUNTO DULY AUTHORIZED ON THE 26TH DAY OF
MARCH, 1996.

CYTOGEN CORPORATION

/s/ Thomas J. McKearn
By __________________________________
THOMAS J. MCKEARN
PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears
below constitutes and appoints Thomas J. McKearn and T. Jerome Madison or
either of them, his attorney-in-fact, each with the power of substitution, for
him in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this Annual Report,
and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that either of said attorneys-in-fact, or his substitute or
substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, THIS
REPORT HAS BEEN SIGNED BY THE FOLLOWING PERSONS ON BEHALF OF THE REGISTRANT
AND IN THE CAPACITIES AND ON THE DATES INDICATED.

SIGNATURE TITLE DATE

/s/ William C. Mills III Chairman of the March 26, 1996
- ------------------------------------- Board of Directors
WILLIAM C. MILLS III

/s/ Thomas J. McKearn President, Chief March 26, 1996
- ------------------------------------- Executive Officer
THOMAS J. MCKEARN and Director
(Principal
Executive Officer)

/s/ T. Jerome Madison Vice President, March 26, 1996
- ------------------------------------- Chief Financial
T. JEROME MADISON Officer, Secretary
and Director
(Principal
Financial and
Accounting Officer)

/s/ Charles E. Austin Director March 26, 1996
- -------------------------------------
CHARLES E. AUSTIN


34


SIGNATURE TITLE DATE

/s/ John E. Bagalay, Jr. Director March 26, 1996
- -------------------------------------
JOHN E. BAGALAY, JR.

/s/ Ronald J. Brenner Director March 26, 1996
- -------------------------------------
RONALD J. BRENNER

/s/ Robert F. Hendrickson Director March 26, 1996
- -------------------------------------
ROBERT F. HENDRICKSON

/s/ Donald E. O'Neill Director March 26, 1996
- -------------------------------------
DONALD E. O'NEILL

/s/ Bruce R. Ross Director March 26, 1996
- -------------------------------------
BRUCE R. ROSS

35




ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995

ITEM 8, ITEM 14(A)(1) AND (2) AND ITEM 14(D)

CYTOGEN CORPORATION

PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY



36


FORM 10-K ITEM 14(A)(1) AND (2) AND ITEM 14(D)

CYTOGEN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

LIST OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT
SCHEDULES

(1) Consolidated Financial Statements

The following consolidated financial statements of CYTOGEN Corporation and
Subsidiaries together with the related notes and report of Arthur Andersen LLP,
independent public accountants, are included in Item 8:



PAGE IN
FORM 10-K
---------

Report of Independent Public Accountants............................. 38
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1995 and 1994......... 39
Consolidated Statements of Operations--Years Ended December 31, 1995,
December 31, 1994 and January 1, 1994............................... 40
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity--Years Ended December
31, 1995 and December 31, 1994 and January 1, 1994.................. 41
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows--Years Ended December 31, 1995,
December 31, 1994 and January 1, 1994............................... 42
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements........................... 43

(2) Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules

The following consolidated financial statement schedule of CYTOGEN
Corporation and Subsidiaries is included in Item 14(d):

Schedule II--Valuation and Qualifying Accounts....................... 54


37


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To CYTOGEN CORPORATION:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of CYTOGEN
Corporation (a Delaware Corporation) and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995
and 1994, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 1995. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of CYTOGEN Corporation and
Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995 and 1994 and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 1995 in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.

Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The schedule listed in the index of
financial statements are presented for purposes of complying with the
Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and are not a required part of the
basic financial statements. This schedule has been subjected to the auditing
procedures applied in our audits of the basic financial statements and, in our
opinion, fairly state in all material respects the financial data required to
be set forth therein in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Philadelphia, PA
February 2, 1996 (except
with respect to the matter
discussed in Note 5 as to
which the date is February
29, 1996)

38


CYTOGEN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(ALL AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)



1995 1994
--------- ---------

ASSETS:
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents.............................. $ 27,551 $ 7,700
Short term investments................................. 1,201 -
Restricted Cash........................................ 383 -
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $536 and $526 in 1995 and 1994,
respectively.......................................... 284 294
Receivable from CytoRad Incorporated................... - 810
Inventories............................................ 356 3,159
Other current assets................................... 360 437
--------- ---------
Total current assets................................. 30,135 12,400
--------- ---------
Property and Equipment:
Leasehold improvements................................. 9,850 9,005
Equipment and furniture................................ 6,535 5,923
--------- ---------
16,385 14,928
Less--Accumulated depreciation and amortization........ (10,923) (9,377)
--------- ---------
Net property and equipment........................... 5,462 5,551
--------- ---------
Other Assets............................................. 1,552 1,739
--------- ---------
$ 37,149 $ 19,690
========= =========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities............... $ 6,385 $ 6,371
Current portion of long term liabilities............... 2,213 2,641
--------- ---------
Total current liabilities............................ 8,598 9,012
--------- ---------
Long Term Liabilities.................................... 3,275 4,310
--------- ---------
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 18)
Redeemable Common Stock, 250,000 shares issued and
outstanding in 1994, at redemption value................ - 2,000
--------- ---------
Stockholders' Equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 5,400,000 shares
authorized--none issued............................... - -
Common stock, $.01 par value, 69,600,000 shares
authorized, 46,040,000 and 24,658,000 shares issued
and outstanding in 1995 and 1994, respectively........ 460 247
Additional paid-in capital............................. 253,122 159,941
Unrealized gains on short term investments............. 34 -
Accumulated deficit.................................... (228,340) (155,820)
--------- ---------
Total stockholders' equity........................... 25,276 4,368
--------- ---------
$ 37,149 $ 19,690
========= =========


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

39


CYTOGEN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(ALL AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)



1995 1994 1993
-------- -------- --------

Revenues:
Product related................................ $ 1,377 $ 1,411 $ 1,591
License and contract........................... 3,608 1,047 8,763
-------- -------- --------
Total Revenues............................... 4,985 2,458 10,354
-------- -------- --------
Operating Expenses:
Research and development....................... 22,594 20,321 24,844
Selling and marketing.......................... 4,493 5,536 9,399
Acquisition of technology and marketing rights. 45,878 4,647 -
General and administrative..................... 4,804 3,962 7,016
-------- -------- --------
Total Operating Expenses..................... 77,769 34,466 41,259
-------- -------- --------
Loss from Operations............................. $(72,784) $(32,008) $(30,905)
-------- -------- --------
Gain (loss) on investments, net.................. 857 (470) 1,676
Interest expense................................. (593) (328) -
-------- -------- --------
Net Loss......................................... $(72,520) $(32,806) $(29,229)
======== ======== ========
Net Loss per Common Share........................ $ (2.11) $ (1.38) $ (1.38)
======== ======== ========
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding....... 34,333 23,822 21,121
======== ======== ========


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

40


CYTOGEN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(ALL AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)



UNREALIZED
ADDITIONAL GAINS ON
COMMON PAID-IN SHORT-TERM ACCUMULATED
STOCK CAPITAL INVESTMENTS DEFICIT
------ ---------- ----------- -----------

Balance, January 2, 1993............. $208 $138,988 $ - $ (93,785)
Granted 500 shares of common stock... - 2 - -
Issued 287,120 shares of common stock
upon exercise of stock options...... 3 1,401 - -
Proceeds from warrants issued in
connection with CytoRad
Incorporated--1993 portion.......... - 3,636 - -
Issued warrants to purchase 260,000
shares of common stock in connection
with acquired technology............ - 507 - -
Net loss............................. - - - (29,229)
---- -------- ---- ---------
Balance, January 1, 1994............. 211 144,534 - (123,014)
Issued 3,400,000 shares of common
stock............................... 34 14,374 - -
Issued 197,942 shares of common stock
per settlement of lawsuit........... 2 998 - -
Granted 10,000 shares of common
stock............................... - 27 - -
Issued 2,680 shares of common stock
upon exercise of stock options...... - 8 - -
Net loss............................. - - - (32,806)
---- -------- ---- ---------
Balance, December 31, 1994........... 247 159,941 - (155,820)
Issued 2,830,182 shares of common
stock............................... 28 11,520 - -
Redemption of common stock........... 3 1,372 - -
Issued 6,035,235 shares of common
stock in connection with the
acquisition of CytoRad Inc.......... 60 29,638 - -
Issued 4,713,565 shares of common
stock in connection with the
acquisition of Cellcor Inc. (see
Note 1)............................. 47 21,164 - -
Issued 5,144,388 shares of common
stock in connection with a
subscription offering............... 51 19,480 - -
Granted 15,000 shares of common
stock............................... - 50 - -
Issued 2,393,000 shares of common
stock upon exercise of stock
options............................. 24 9,957 - -
Unrealized gains on investments...... - - 34 -
Net loss............................. - - - (72,520)
---- -------- ---- ---------
Balance, December 31, 1995........... $460 $253,122 $ 34 $(228,340)
==== ======== ==== =========


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

41


CYTOGEN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(ALL AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)



1995 1994 1993
-------- -------- --------

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net Loss........................................ $(72,520) $(32,806) $(29,229)
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Loss to Cash Used
for Operating Activities:
Acquisition of Marketing and Technology
Rights....................................... 45,878 3,220 -
Depreciation and Amortization................. 1,546 1,009 1,297
Imputed Interest.............................. 593 328 -
Idle Equipment................................ - - 215
Inventory Writedown........................... 2,926 1,074 2,346
Writedown of Land............................. - - 600
Warrants Issued to Acquire Technology......... - - 507
Stock Grants.................................. 78 62 7
Amortization of Deferred Charges.............. (17) (110) (84)
Changes in Assets and Liabilities, Net of
Effect from Acqusitions:
Accounts receivable, net.................... (255) (71) 2,531
Receivable from CytoRad Incorporated........ - (62) 480
Inventories................................. (82) (145) (998)
Other current assets........................ 469 238 1,328
Other assets................................ 291 (327) 1
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities.... (2,170) 667 5,620
Other liabilities........................... (2,461) (722) -
-------- -------- --------
Total adjustments......................... 46,796 5,161 13,850
-------- -------- --------
Net cash used for operating activities........ (25,724) (27,645) (15,379)
-------- -------- --------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Net Cash Acquired in CytoRad Acquisition (See
Note 5)........................................ 10,455 - -
Net Cash Used to Acquire Cellcor Inc. (See Note
2)............................................. (3,463) - -
(Increase) Decrease in Short Term Investments... (1,167) 19,690 13,171
Increase in Restricted Cash..................... (383) - -
Purchases of Property and Equipment............. (595) (2,835) (1,555)
-------- -------- --------
Net cash provided by investing activities..... 4,847 16,855 11,616
-------- -------- --------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock.......... 41,060 14,416 1,403
Redemption of Common Stock...................... (332) - -
Proceeds from Warrants Issued in Connection with
CytoRad Incorporated........................... - - 3,557
-------- -------- --------
Net cash provided by financing activities..... 40,728 14,416 4,960
-------- -------- --------
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents....... 19,851 3,626 1,197
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Year.... 7,700 4,074 2,877
-------- -------- --------
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Year.......... $ 27,551 $ 7,700 $ 4,074
======== ======== ========


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

42


CYTOGEN CORPORATION AND SUDSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:

Business

CYTOGEN Corporation ("CYTOGEN" or the "Company") is a biopharmaceutical
company engaged in the discovery, development, manufacture and marketing of
products to better diagnose and treat cancer and other related immunologic
diseases. In November 1995, FDA approved the PLA supplement for OncoScint
CR/OV, expanding the approved indication to include repeat administration of
the product. OncoScint CR/OV was initially approved by FDA in December 1992
but restricted to a single administration per patient. In August 1995, the NDA
for Quadramet (or Samarium 153 EDTMP), CYTOGEN's treatment for the severe pain
associated with cancer that spreads to the bone, was officially filed by FDA.
In March 1995, the PLA for ProstaScint, CYTOGEN's prostate cancer diagnostic
imaging product, was officially filed by FDA. In 1991, CYTOGEN received
approval for the sale of its OncoScint colorectal cancer imaging product in
Europe. In October 1995, CYTOGEN acquired Cellcor. Cellcor, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of CYTOGEN, is a biotechnology company engaged in the development
and commercialization of cellular therapies. References herein to the
"Company" may mean CYTOGEN and Cellcor on a consolidated basis taken as a
whole, where appropriate. In order to develop, manufacture and commercialize
its products effectively, the Company will require additional financing.

Operations of the Company are subject to certain risks and uncertainties
including, but not limited to uncertainties related to product market
acceptance and clinical trials, technological uncertainty, uncertainties of
future profitability, access to capital, dependence on collaborative
relationships and key personnel.

Basis of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company
and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Intercompany balances and transactions have
been eliminated in consolidation.

Fiscal Year

Beginning in 1994, the Company changed from a fiscal year end to a calendar
year end. Previously, the Company operated on a 52-53 week fiscal year ending
on the Saturday nearest to December 31. References to 1993 relate to the
fiscal year ended January 1, 1994.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, cash in banks and all
highly-liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less at the time
of purchase.

Short Term Investments

Management determines the appropriate classification of debt and equity
securities at the time of purchase and reevaluates such designation as of each
balance sheet date. At December 31, 1995, the Company's short term investments
are classified as available for sale and are carried at fair value based on
quoted market prices. Differences between an investment's amortized cost and
fair value are charged directly to stockholders' equity, net of income taxes.
Accordingly, a net unrealized gain of approximately $34,000 has been recorded
as a separate component of stockholders' equity at December 31, 1995.

43


CYTOGEN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Restricted Cash

The Company has entered into equipment lease financing arrangements that
require the issuance of letters of credit that are secured by certain cash and
cash equivalents. The aggregate amount of these cash and cash equivalents
totaled $383,000 and are segregated and classified as restricted cash in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Inventory

The Company's inventory is primarily related to OncoScint CR/OV, its FDA-
approved monoclonal antibody-based imaging agent for the diagnosis of
colorectal and ovarian cancers. Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or
market using the first-in, first-out method and consisted of:



1995 1994
-------- ----------

Raw Materials............................................ $ 46,000 $2,771,000
Work in Process.......................................... - 49,000
Finished Goods........................................... 310,000 339,000
-------- ----------
$356,000 $3,159,000
======== ==========


At December 31, 1995 and 1994, inventory is net of reserves of $3.8 million
and 1.5 million, respectively.

Property and Depreciation

Equipment and furniture are stated at cost net of depreciation and a
$215,000 reserve for idle equipment. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a
straight-line basis over the lease period or the estimated useful life,
whichever is shorter. Equipment and furniture are depreciated on a straight-
line basis over five years. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are
expensed as incurred. For 1995, 1994 and 1993, repairs and maintenance
expenses were $274,000, $382,000 and $310,000, respectively.

Other Assets

Other assets consist primarily of undeveloped real property with a net book
value of $1,284,000, which is valued at the lower of cost or market (see Note
11).

Revenue Recognition

Product related revenues include (i) product sales by CYTOGEN to its
customers and its former U.S. and European distributors, Knoll and Chiron,
respectively, (ii) co-promotion revenues, which resulted from the sale of
commercial product by Knoll to its customers, and (iii) royalty payments on
product sales by Chiron to its customers. Product sales are recognized upon
shipment of finished goods. Co-promotion revenues were recognized upon the
shipment by Knoll of product to its customers. Royalty revenues were
recognized when Chiron shipped product to its customers. See Notes 6 and 11
for discussion of the changes in CYTOGEN's relationships with Knoll and
Chiron, respectively. Beginning on October 20, 1995, as a result of CYTOGEN's
acquisition of Cellcor (see Note 2), product related revenues also include the
recovery of costs associated with the treatment of patients who have received
ALT for metastatic renal cell carcinoma under a compassionate protocol, based
on the expected payments from third party payors and patients.

License and contract revenues include milestone payments and fees under
collaborative agreements with third parties, the sale of research services and
materials, and revenues from other miscellaneous sources. Revenues from
milestone payments are recognized when all parties concur that the events
stipulated in the agreement have been achieved. Revenues from cost-plus
contracts are recognized when the costs are incurred.

44


CYTOGEN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Research and Development

Research and development expenditures consist of projects conducted by the
Company and payments made to sponsored research programs and consultants. All
research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Research and
development expenditures for customer sponsored programs were $200,000,
$29,000 and $9,112,000 in 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively.

Patent Costs

Patent costs are expensed as incurred.

Common Stock Outstanding

As a result of the Cellcor merger, the issued and outstanding shares of
Cellcor common stock and preferred stock ("Cellcor Shares") were converted
into the right to receive shares of CYTOGEN common stock. As of December 31,
1995, certain holders of Cellcor Shares had not yet exchanged their Cellcor
Shares for shares of CYTOGEN common stock. For accounting purposes, all
Cellcor Shares were deemed exchanged for issued and outstanding shares of
CYTOGEN common stock as of the date of the Cellcor merger. See Note 2.

Loss Per Share

Net loss per common share is based upon the weighted average common shares
outstanding during each period. Common stock equivalents and other potentially
dilutive securities are not included as their effect is antidilutive.

New Accounting Pronouncements

The Financial Accounting Standards Board has issued SFAS No. 123,
"Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation." The Company is required to adopt
this standard for the year ending December 31, 1996. The Company has elected
to adopt the disclosure requirement of this pronouncement. The adoption of
this pronouncement will have no impact on the Company's statement of
operations.

Reclassification

Certain reclassifications have been reflected in the 1993 and 1994 financial
statements to conform with the 1995 presentation.

Supplemental Schedule of Noncash Financing Activity

In 1994, CYTOGEN issued 197,942 shares of common stock in settlement of a
lawsuit (see Note 19).

2. CELLCOR, INC.:

CYTOGEN entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated June 15, 1995, as
amended (the "Merger Agreement"), with Cellcor. At the effective time of the
Cellcor merger, each outstanding share of Cellcor common stock was converted
into the right to receive 0.60 shares of CYTOGEN common stock and each
outstanding share of Cellcor Convertible Preferred Stock was converted into
the right to receive 218.94 shares of CYTOGEN common stock. In addition,
holders of record of Cellcor common stock were granted the non-transferable
right to purchase for cash up to an aggregate of approximately $26 million of
CYTOGEN common stock (the "Subscription Offering"). Each holder of Cellcor
common stock was entitled to purchase 1.118 shares of CYTOGEN common stock for
each share of Cellcor common stock (rounded down to the nearest whole number)
held by such holder at the close of business on the Subscription Offering
record date, at a price of $3.89 per share of CYTOGEN common stock. Under the
terms of the Merger Agreement, CYTOGEN also assumed all then outstanding
options to purchase Cellcor common stock granted under Cellcor employee stock
option

45


CYTOGEN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
plans ("Cellcor Stock Options") and all then outstanding warrants to purchase
Cellcor common stock, exercisable for the equivalent of CYTOGEN common stock
using the above described exchange ratio.

On October 20, 1995, CYTOGEN completed its acquisition of Cellcor. As a
result of the Cellcor merger, CYTOGEN issued (i) 4,713,564 shares of CYTOGEN
common stock to acquire Cellcor (see Note 1) and (ii) 5,144,388 shares of
CYTOGEN common stock in connection with the Subscription Offering raising a
total of $20.0 million, and has reserved for issuance up to 606,952 shares of
CYTOGEN common stock issuable upon the exercise of Cellcor Stock Options. The
transaction was accounted for by using the purchase method of accounting,
whereby the Company recorded a one-time, non-cash charge of approximately
$26.2 million for acquisition of technology rights to its statement of
operations in the fourth quarter of 1995, which charge represented the amount
by which the purchase price exceeded the fair value of net assets acquired
from Cellcor.

3. ELAN CORPORATION:

In December 1995, CYTOGEN and Elan entered into the Elan Agreement under
which both parties will implement a research program that combines CYTOGEN's
GDL technology with Elan's drug delivery system technology to collaboratively
develop orally administered products. Thereunder, Elan has been granted an
option for the exclusive worldwide licensing rights to any products so
developed and the Company will receive royalties based on sales, if any, of
such products. Elan will provide the funding necessary for the Company to
fulfill its obligations under the research program with aggregate payments for
work performed by CYTOGEN not to exceed $1.5 million during the first sixteen
months of the research program.

4. DUPONT MERCK:

On December 20, 1994, CYTOGEN entered into the DP/Merck Agreement with
DuPont Merck. Under the terms of the DP/Merck Agreement, CYTOGEN has licensed
to DuPont Merck CYTOGEN's manufacturing and marketing rights to Quadramet in
the U.S., if and when approved for marketing by FDA. CYTOGEN has retained the
right to co-promote the product to nuclear medicine specialists. CYTOGEN
acquired the U.S. rights to Quadramet from Dow pursuant to a license agreement
in March 1993 and assumed responsibility for the development and
commercialization of the product at that time (see Note 7). The NDA for
Quadramet was officially filed by FDA in August 1995.

Pursuant to the terms of the DP/Merck Agreement, CYTOGEN received from
DuPont Merck an up-front cash payment of $1.0 million in December 1994, $4.0
million in January 1995 for the sale of 908,265 shares of CYTOGEN's common
stock to DuPont Merck and $1.3 million in January 1995 to fund additional
clinical programs to expand the use and marketing of Quadramet. The DP/Merck
Agreement further provides for future payments of up to $2.9 million toward
additional clinical programs, a $2.0 million milestone payment if and when
Quadramet receives FDA approval, and royalty payments based on sales,
including guaranteed minimum payments.

5. CYTORAD INCORPORATED:

On November 15, 1994, CYTOGEN entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger
(the "CytoRad Merger Agreement") with CytoRad to purchase all of CytoRad's
outstanding units, each unit consisting of one share of the callable common
stock of CytoRad and one warrant to purchase one share of CYTOGEN common stock
at $24.15 per share. Pursuant to the CytoRad Merger Agreement, on January 20,
1995, CYTOGEN commenced an exchange offer to exchange for each CytoRad unit
(i) 1.5 shares of CYTOGEN common stock, (ii) a warrant to acquire one share of
CYTOGEN common stock for $8.00 that expires January 31, 1997 and (iii) a CVR
to receive, under certain circumstances and at no additional cost, up to one-
half share of CYTOGEN common stock. The CVRs were to be triggered in the event
that the aggregate trading price of 1.5 shares of CYTOGEN common

46


CYTOGEN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

stock and the new warrant averaged less than $12.00 during the 45 consecutive
trading days ending January 31, 1997, but were to expire and have no value if
the aggregate trading price for such securities averaged $12.00 or more during
any 45 consecutive trading days prior to January 31, 1997. On February 29,
1996, the Company announced that the CVRs had expired by their terms and were
of no further value. Accordingly, the Company no longer has an obligation to
issue shares of its common stock to holders of CVRs on January 31, 1997.

On February 27, 1995, CYTOGEN completed its acquisition of CytoRad by
merging CytoRad with and into a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.
Holders of CytoRad common stock who did not tender their CytoRad units in the
exchange offer became entitled to receive as a result of the merger one and
one-half shares of CYTOGEN common stock and one CVR for each share of CytoRad
common stock owned thereby. As of December 31, 1995, CYTOGEN had issued
6,035,235 shares of common stock, 4,023,495 CVRs and 4,023,495 warrants
pursuant to the exchange offer. Although the 1,505 previously issued CYTOGEN
warrants forming a part of CytoRad units not tendered in the exchange offer
remain outstanding after the merger, the Company has agreed that such warrants
will be exercisable at $8.00 per warrant share pursuant to the terms of the
CytoRad Merger Agreement. As a result of the merger, the Company reacquired
all rights it had previously licensed to CytoRad. In addition, the Company
acquired $11.7 million of CytoRad's cash and securities, before payment of
certain transaction costs. In the first quarter of 1995, CYTOGEN recorded
approximately $19.7 million for acquisition of technology and marketing rights
as a charge to its statement of operations, representing the amount by which
the purchase price exceeded the fair value of net assets acquired from
CytoRad.

Prior to the merger, CYTOGEN did not recognize any contract revenues for
services performed on behalf of CytoRad in 1995 and 1994, due to the
uncertainty of the CytoRad business relationship. In 1993, CYTOGEN recorded
$5.9 million of contract revenues from CytoRad, net of amortization of
warrants issued.

6. KNOLL PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY:

In December 1991, CYTOGEN and Knoll entered into the Knoll Agreement for the
co-promotion of OncoScint CR/OV in the U.S. The agreement provided for
revenues from product sales from the supply of commercial product by CYTOGEN
to Knoll, co-promotion revenues from the sale of commercial product by Knoll
to its customers, and reimbursement to CYTOGEN of certain product development
expenses. CYTOGEN also agreed to share with Knoll certain sales promotion
expenses which were to be paid by CYTOGEN from earned co-promotion revenues.
In 1994 and 1993, CYTOGEN incurred $412,000 and $5.1 million, respectively, in
co-promotion expenses and recognized $430,000 and $977,000, respectively, in
co-promotion revenues.

On November 1, 1994, CYTOGEN executed the Termination Agreement with Knoll.
Pursuant to the Termination Agreement, the Company has reacquired from Knoll
all U.S. marketing rights (the "U.S. Rights") to OncoScint CR/OV, which were
previously granted to Knoll pursuant to the Knoll Agreement. The Termination
Agreement requires the Company to pay to Knoll, over a four-year period and
without interest, $3.0 million to reacquire the U.S. Rights and $5.0 million
of liabilities previously incurred under the terms of the Knoll Agreement. The
payment of these liabilities will be made as follows: $3.1 million in 1995
(which amount has been paid); $1.6 million in 1996; $1.6 million in 1997; and
$1.7 million in 1998. In November 1994, CYTOGEN recorded a non-recurring
charge of $2.4 million for the reacquisition of the U.S. Rights. Imputed
interest of $521,000 and $328,000 relating to the obligation, which was
discounted based upon a 10% interest rate, was recorded in 1995 and 1994,
respectively.

In anticipation of the execution of the Termination Agreement, as of May 20,
1994, Knoll ceased its selling efforts, and since that date, CYTOGEN's direct
sales force has been the sole marketer in the U.S. of OncoScint CR/OV.
Beginning on July 1, 1994, the Company has not recorded any product sales to
Knoll or any co-promotion revenues.

47


CYTOGEN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

7. THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY:

In 1993, CYTOGEN acquired an exclusive license in the U.S. from Dow for
Quadramet. In connection with this acquisition, CYTOGEN issued to Dow warrants
to purchase 260,000 shares of CYTOGEN's common stock at $12.50 per share. The
Company valued the warrants at $507,000 and recorded this amount as a charge
to research and development expense. In the third quarter of 1995, upon the
filing of the NDA for Quadramet with FDA, CYTOGEN recorded a one-time
licensing fee of $2.0 million from Dow for its use of the Quadramet NDA filing
package. At the same time, CYTOGEN was required to pay to Dow $1.0 millon. The
Company will be required to pay to Dow $4.0 million if and when Quadramet
receives FDA approval. The agreement provides for additional payments by the
Company upon achievement of certain milestones and royalties on net sales of
the product once commercialized, including guaranteed minimum payments.

8. REVENUES FROM MAJOR CUSTOMERS:

Customers who contributed 10% or more of the Company's total product
related, license and contract revenues were as follows:



CUSTOMER 1995 1994 1993
-------- ---- ---- ----

Dow (Note 7).................................................. 39% - % - %
DuPont Merck (Note 4)......................................... 27 41 -
Medi-Physics, Inc............................................. 12 - -
Knoll (Note 6)................................................ - 16 14
CytoRad (Note 5).............................................. - - 76


Medi-Physics, Inc. is a chain of radiopharmacies.

9. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES:



1995 1994
---------- ----------

Professional and legal................................ $1,487,000 $ 468,000
Accounts payable...................................... 1,307,000 1,572,000
Payroll............................................... 1,267,000 278,000
Research contracts and materials...................... 965,000 2,694,000
Other accruals........................................ 1,359,000 1,359,000
---------- ----------
$6,385,000 $6,371,000
========== ==========


10. LINE-OF-CREDIT:

At December 31, 1995, the Company had an unused secured line-of-credit of
$3.0 million expiring in July 1996. Interest rates on any borrowings under the
line-of-credit will vary depending on the amounts borrowed. The Company did
not have any borrowings outstanding under the line-of-credit in 1994 and 1995.

48


CYTOGEN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

11. LONG TERM LIABILITIES:



1995 1994
---------- ----------

Due to Knoll, net of $722,000 receivable in 1994
(Note 6)............................................ $4,237,000 $6,157,000
Due to Chiron, net of $125,000 receivable in 1994.... 785,000 712,000
Capital lease obligations............................ 448,000 -
Deferred charges..................................... 18,000 82,000
---------- ----------
5,488,000 6,951,000
Less: Current portion................................ 2,213,000 2,641,000
---------- ----------
$3,275,000 $4,310,000
========== ==========


On December 30, 1994, CYTOGEN entered into the Disengagement Agreement with
Chiron. Pursuant to a Distribution and License Agreement dated as of October
21, 1989 and as amended on May 18, 1992, CYTOGEN had granted to Chiron the
European Rights, under which contract and product related revenues of $3,000,
$162,000 and $164,000 were recognized in 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively.
Under the Disengagement Agreement, CYTOGEN reacquired the European Rights and
purchased certain business assets relating to the European Rights, including
existing approvals by the appropriate regulatory authorities to market
OncoScint CR/OV in 12 countries in Europe. This reacquisition was consummated
on February 16, 1995. The resulting liability of CYTOGEN to Chiron, which
consisted of the reacquisition price of $1.0 million, was partially offset by
a then outstanding receivable of $127,000 from Chiron, and will be paid over
three years and without interest, as follows: $200,000 in 1995 (which amount
has been paid), $300,000 in 1996 and $377,181 in 1997. Payment is secured by a
mortgage covering approximately 11 acres of undeveloped real property owned by
the Company in Ewing, New Jersey. This obligation is non-recourse to the
Company. As a result of the reacquisition of the European Rights, CYTOGEN
recorded a liability and non-recurring charge of $800,000 in the fourth
quarter of 1994. Imputed interest of $71,000 relating to the obligation, based
upon a 10% interest rate, was recorded in 1995. In December 1995 and January
1996, CYTOGEN entered into agreements with Faulding and CISbio, respectively,
to market and distribute OncoScint CR/OV outside the U.S. (see Note 18).

The Company leases certain equipment under capital leases which will expire
on various dates through 2000. Property and equipment leased under non-
cancelable capital leases have a net book value of $462,000 at December 31,
1995. Payments to be made under capital lease obligations (including interest
of $84,000) are as follows: $139,000 in 1996, $133,000 in 1997, $126,000 in
1998, $119,000 in 1999 and $15,000 in 2000.

12. REDEEMABLE COMMON STOCK:

In September 1989, CYTOGEN entered into the Bracco Agreement, pursuant to
which Bracco purchased 250,000 shares of CYTOGEN common stock at $8.00 per
share. The Bracco Agreement provided that CYTOGEN would be obligated to
repurchase the Bracco Shares from Bracco under certain circumstances for an
aggregate purchase price of $2.0 million (the "Purchase Price"). In August
1995, CYTOGEN and Bracco agreed that Bracco would sell the Bracco Shares on
NASDAQ and Bracco sold the Bracco Shares for an aggregate purchase price of
$1,375,000 (the "Shares Sale Price"), or $5.50 per share. At that date, Bracco
had an outstanding account payable due and owing to CYTOGEN in an amount equal
to $293,408 (the "Payable"). CYTOGEN also agreed to pay to Bracco the amount
equal to the difference between (i) the Purchase Price and (ii) the sum of the
Shares Sales Price plus the Payable (or $331,592), in full settlement of the
issue, which amount has been paid.

Under the Bracco Agreement, contract revenues of $41,000 and $860,000 were
recognized in 1994 and 1993, respectively.

49


CYTOGEN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

13. COMMON STOCK:

In January 1994, CYTOGEN sold an aggregate of 2 million shares of common
stock to several European institutions, realizing net proceeds of $9.1
million.

On May 6, 1994, CYTOGEN and Fletcher entered into a revised investment
agreement under which (i) Fletcher purchased 500,000 shares of CYTOGEN common
stock at a price of $3.50 per share totalling $1.7 million, (ii) assignees of
Fletcher purchased an additional 900,000 shares of CYTOGEN common stock in
August 1994 at $4.00 per share totalling $3.6 million, (iii) Fletcher
purchased 1.8 million shares of CYTOGEN common stock in August 1995, at an
aggregate price of approximately $7.3 million, or $4.058 per share, under the
Option, pursuant to which Fletcher could purchase up to 9.9% of CYTOGEN's
outstanding common stock (including shares previously purchased), (iv)
Fletcher purchased 500,000 shares of CYTOGEN common stock in November 1995, at
an aggregate price of $2.3 million, or $4.696 per share, pursuant to the
exercise of the Option, as amended in August 1995, and (v) Fletcher purchased
an aggregate of 1.0 million shares of CYTOGEN common stock in January 1996, at
an aggregate price of $4.7 million, or $4.70 per share, pursuant to the
exercise of the Option, as amended in November 1995.

In September 1995, CYTOGEN and Fletcher Fund entered into the Investment
Agreement pursuant to which CYTOGEN (i) sold to Fletcher Fund 665,352 shares
of CYTOGEN common stock on September 11, 1995 for an aggregate purchase price
of $2.7 million, and (ii) will have the right, during the period beginning
October 13, 1995 and ending March 29, 1996, to issue and sell to Fletcher
Fund, and Fletcher Fund will be obligated to purchase, up to 675,000 shares of
CYTOGEN common stock from time to time (collectively, the "Put Rights") at a
purchase price per share equal to 101% of the average of the daily volume
weighted average price of CYTOGEN common stock on NASDAQ during a designated
twenty-one business day period. Under certain circumstances, Fletcher Fund
will have the right to decrease or increase the number of shares of CYTOGEN
common stock to be purchased in connection with the exercise of a Put Right by
CYTOGEN, but in no event shall the total number of shares sold by CYTOGEN and
purchased by Fletcher Fund pursuant to the Investment Agreement exceed 4.9% of
the total number of shares of CYTOGEN common stock outstanding, after giving
effect to the proposed sale and purchase of the shares in question. The shares
to be issued and sold in this transaction were registered pursuant to a
registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the Commission in April 1994.

In November 1995, the Company sold 1,256,565 shares of common stock to a
private institutional investor in a private placement transaction pursuant to
Regulation S of the Securities Act for an aggregate price of $5.0 million and,
in connection therewith, the Company was granted the right to put to that
investor, until March 31, 1996, that number of shares equal to $5 million
divided by a formula purchase price.

The Company and Nomura executed an agreement effective as of February 23,
1996 that terminated the Purchase Agreement between the Company and Nomura
dated March 28, 1995. No sales of stock occurred under the terms of the
agreement.

See Notes 2, 4, 5 and 19 for information related to the Company's issuance
of common stock in connection with the Cellcor merger, DP/Merck Agreement,
CytoRad merger and settlement of stockholders litigation, respectively. See
Note 12 for discussion of redeemable common stock.

50


CYTOGEN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

14. STOCK OPTIONS AND GRANTS:

The Company has various stock option plans which provide for the issuance of
incentive and non-qualified stock options to employees, non-employee directors
and outside consultants, for which an aggregate of 4,070,500 shares of common
stock have been reserved. The persons to whom options may be granted and the
number, type, and terms of the options vary among the plans. Options are
granted with an exercise term of 10 years and generally become exercisable in
installments over periods of up to 5 years at an exercise price determined
either by the plan or equal to the fair market value of the common stock at
the date of grant. Under certain circumstances, vesting may accelerate. In
September 1993, the Company offered new options to non-executive employees in
exchange for existing options, both vested and non-vested, at an exercise
price equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the date of the
restructuring. Activity under these plans was as follows:



NUMBER OF PRICE RANGE
SHARES PER SHARE
--------- -----------

Balance at January 2, 1993............................ 1,804,540 $1.00-20.00
Granted............................................. 887,900 5.63-19.88
Exercised........................................... (287,120) 1.00-15.69
Cancelled........................................... (718,010) 3.18-20.00
--------- -----------
Balance at January 1, 1994............................ 1,687,310 $1.00-17.00
Granted............................................. 778,080 2.44-6.19
Exercised........................................... (2,680) 1.00-3.88
Cancelled........................................... (334,770) 3.88-17.00
--------- -----------
Balance at December 31, 1994.......................... 2,127,940 $1.00-17.00
Granted............................................. 1,425,607 2.69-5.47
Exercised........................................... (91,400) 1.00-3.88
Cancelled........................................... (509,290) 2.69-17.00
--------- -----------
Balance at December 31, 1995.......................... 2,952,857 $2.69-17.00
========= ===========


At December 31, 1995, options to purchase 670,843 shares were exercisable
and 310,142 shares were available for issuance of additional options that may
be granted under the plans.

In connection with the Cellcor merger (see Note 2), CYTOGEN reserved for
issuance 606,952 shares of common stock that will become issuable upon the
exercise of the Cellcor Stock Options assumed by CYTOGEN under the terms of
the Merger Agreement. At December 31, 1995, 603,052 Cellcor Stock Options were
outstanding at exercise prices ranging from $0.50 to $8.75 and 301,889 Cellcor
Stock Options were exercisable.

In 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively, 15,000, 10,000 and 500 shares of
common stock were granted to the officers of the Company and a member of
CYTOGEN's Scientific Advisory Board. The expense related to these commitments
to grant shares of stock is based upon the fair value of those shares on the
date of the commitment and is recognized over the period beginning with such
commitment and ending with the actual grant.

15. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS:

Consulting services are provided under an agreement with a company owned by
an officer of the Company, who is a member of the Board of Directors. In 1993,
one of CYTOGEN's former principal stockholders, who was a member of the Board
of Directors, also provided consulting services to CYTOGEN. The annual fees
under the agreements were $208,000, $180,000 and $61,900 in 1995, 1994 and
1993, respectively.

The seven members of CYTOGEN's Scientific Advisory Board were stockholders
and provided consulting services to CYTOGEN in 1993. Consulting fees,
including stock grants, paid to the five non-employee members totaled $47,000
in 1993.

51


CYTOGEN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

16. PENSION PLANS:

CYTOGEN maintains a defined contribution pension plan. The contribution is
determined by the Board of Directors each year and is based upon a percentage
of gross wages of eligible employees. The plan provides for vesting over five
years, with credit given for prior service. CYTOGEN also makes contributions
under a 401(k) plan in amounts which match up to 50% of the salary deferred by
the participants. Matching is capped at 6% of deferred salaries. Total pension
expense was $311,000, $256,000 and $335,000 for 1995, 1994 and 1993,
respectively.

17. INCOME TAXES:

As of December 31, 1995, CYTOGEN had federal net operating loss
carryforwards of approximately $123 million. The Company also had federal and
state research and development tax credit carryforwards of approximately $5
million. The net operating loss and credit carryforwards have begun to expire
in 1995.

The Tax Reform Act of 1986 contains provisions that limit the utilization of
net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards if there has been an
"ownership change". Such an "ownership change" as described in Section 382 of
the Internal Revenue Code may limit the Company's utilization of its net
operating loss and tax credit carryforwards.

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effect of temporary differences
between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting
purposes and the amount used for income tax purposes. Based upon the Company's
earnings history, a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is required to
reduce the Company's net deferred tax assets to the amount realizable at
present (zero).

Significant components of the Company's deferred tax assets for federal and
state income taxes are as follows (in thousands):



1995 1994
-------- --------

Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carryforwards....................... $ 41,800 $ 34,000
Capitalized research and development expenses.......... 19,300 16,000
Research and development credit........................ 5,000 4,000
Reacquisition of technology and marketing rights....... 1,500 1,500
Inventory reserves..................................... 2,800 1,000
Other, net............................................. 830 -
-------- --------
Total deferred tax assets............................ 71,230 56,500
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets.......... (71,230) (56,500)
-------- --------
Net deferred tax assets............................ $ - $ -
======== ========


In 1995, CYTOGEN acquired CytoRad (see Note 5) and Cellcor (see Note 2),
both of which have net operating loss carryforwards. Approximately $20 million
of these carryforwards may be available to offset future taxable income. An
additional net operating loss carryforward may be available in certain
circumstances. A 100% valuation allowance was established on the acquisition
dates as realization of these tax assets is uncertain.

52


CYTOGEN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

18. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:

The Company leases its facilities and certain equipment under non-cancelable
operating leases which expire at various times through 2003. Rent expense
incurred on these leases was $1.2 million, $1.2 million and $1.3 million in
1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively. Minimum future obligations under the
operating leases total $8.4 million as of December 31, 1995 and will be paid
as follows: $2.0 million in 1996, $1.6 million in 1997, $1.3 million in 1998,
$1.3 million in 1999, $0.9 million in 2000 and an aggregate of $1.3 million in
2001 through 2003.

The Company has an agreement which provides for equipment lease financings.
As of December 31, 1995, the Company has $1.1 million in sale-leaseback
refinancings of which approximately $400,000 was outstanding against this
arrangement. The refinancings resulted in a deferred gain which is being
amortized over the lease term of 45 months. The sale-leaseback refinancings
are secured by $358,200 in standby letters of credit provided under a letter
of credit agreement. Minimum future obligations under these and other non-
cancelable leases totalled $150,000 at December 31, 1995 and will be paid in
1996.

The Company is obligated to make minimum future payments under research and
development contracts which expire at various times. As of December 31, 1995,
the minimum future payments under contracts with fixed terms totalled $342,000
and will be paid as follows: $312,000 in 1996, $26,000 in 1997 and $4,000 in
1998. Under contracts whose expirations are not fixed, the annual minimum
payments are $41,000 in 1996, $56,000 in 1997, $66,000 in 1998, $76,000 in
1999, $86,000 in 2000 and thereafter. In addition, the Company is obligated to
pay royalties on revenues from commercial products developed from the
research, including certain guaranteed minimum payments.

In December 1995 and January 1996, CYTOGEN entered into agreements with
Faulding and CISbio, respectively, to market and distribute OncoScint CR/OV
outside the U.S. Faulding is currently pursuing the necessary regulatory
approvals in Canada. CISbio is expected to relaunch OncoScint CR/OV during
1996 in eight Western European countries and four Eastern European countries
where the product has been approved for marketing.

19. LITIGATION:

On November 18, 1994, final approval was given to the settlement of the 1992
class action securities law suit, which provided for a $1,950,000 cash payment
(which includes approximately $900,000 of fees and expenses of plantiffs'
counsel), the issuance of 197,942 shares of CYTOGEN common stock and an
additional $500,000 payable if the Company has annual earnings per share of
$.50 or greater during any fiscal year commencing with 1993 through 1996.

53


CYTOGEN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

SCHEDULE II

VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS



COLUMN A COLUMN B COLUMN C COLUMN D COLUMN E
-------- ---------- ------------------------------- ---------- -------------
ADDITIONS
BALANCE AT -------------------------------
BEGINNING CHARGED TO COSTS BALANCE AT
DESCRIPTION OF PERIOD AND EXPENSES OTHER ACCOUNTS DEDUCTIONS END OF PERIOD
----------- ---------- ---------------- -------------- ---------- -------------

FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1995:
Allowances for
doubtful accounts
receivable.......... $526,000 $ 10,000 $ - $ - $536,000
FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1994:
Allowances for
doubtful accounts
receivable.......... $526,000 $ - $ - $ - $526,000
FOR THE YEAR ENDED
JANUARY 1, 1994:
Allowances for
doubtful accounts
receivable.......... $263,000 $263,000 $ - $ - $526,000


54






EXHIBIT INDEX
-------------

Exhibit Sequentially
Number Description Numbered Page
- ------ ----------- -------------

10.16.3 Second Amendment to the Option Agreement between CYTOGEN Corporation and
Fletcher Capital Markets, Inc., dated November 15, 1995.

10.26 Description of arrangement with Somerest Central Corporation.

10.30 CYTOGEN Corporation 1995 Stock Option Plan.

10.31 Research and Development and Option Agreement, dated December 14, 1995,
between CYTOGEN Corporation and Elan Corporation, plc.**

10.32 Distribution Agreement, dated December 22, 1995, between CYTOGEN Corporation
and Faulding (Canada) Inc.**

10.33 Distribution Agreement, dated January 16, 1996, between CYTOGEN Corporation
and CIS biointernational.**

10.34 Severance Agreement effective as of January 1, 1994 between CYTOGEN Corporation and
Thomas J. McKearn, M.D., Ph.D.

10.35 Description of Severance Agreement with Richard J. Walsh.

10.36 Horosziewicz - CYTOGEN Agreement, dated April 20, 1989, between CYTOGEN
Corporation and Julius S. Horosziewicz, M.D., DMSe.**

21 Subsidiaries of CYTOGEN Corporation

23 Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP

27 Financial Data Schedule (Submitted to SEC only in electronic format)





** CYTOGEN Corporation has requested confidential treatment of certain
provisions contained in this exhibit. The copy filed as an exhibit omits the
information subject to the confidentiality request.



-65-