Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark one)

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002

OR

For the transition period from         to        

Commission file number 1-3435

VERIZON NEW YORK INC.

1095 Avenue of the Americas, Room 3868, New York, New York 10036

Telephone number: (212) 395-2121

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: See attached Schedule A.

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None.

THE REGISTRANT MEETS THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN GENERAL INSTRUCTION I(1)(a) AND (b) OF FORM 10-K AND IS THEREFORE FILING THIS FORM WITH REDUCED DISCLOSURE FORMAT PURSUANT TO GENERAL INSTRUCTION I(2).

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Table of Contents

SCHEDULE A

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Table of Contents

Verizon New York Inc.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, ALL INFORMATION IS AS OF MARCH 14, 2003.

Table of Contents

Verizon New York Inc.

PART I

Item 1. Business

(Abbreviated pursuant to General Instruction I(2).)

GENERAL

Verizon New York Inc. is incorporated under the laws of the State of New York. We are a wholly owned subsidiary of NYNEX Corporation (NYNEX), which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Verizon Communications Inc. (Verizon).

Our wholly owned subsidiary, Empire City Subway Company, is primarily in the business of leasing underground conduit in Manhattan and the Bronx, principally to us, but also to other companies in the telecommunications business.

We presently serve a territory consisting of Local Access and Transport Areas (LATAs) in New York, as well as a small portion of Connecticut (Greenwich and Byram only). These LATAs are generally centered on a city or based on some other identifiable common geography.

We currently provide two basic types of telecommunications services:

As of December 31, 2002, we had approximately 28,400 employees. Approximately 85% of our employees (associates) are covered by collective bargaining agreements. Collective bargaining agreements with the unions expire in August 2003.

REGULATION

Telecommunications Act of 1996

We face increasing competition in all areas of our business. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 (1996 Act), regulatory and judicial actions and the development of new technologies, products and services have created opportunities for alternative telecommunication service providers, many of which are subject to fewer regulatory constraints.

In-Region Long Distance

Under the 1996 Act, our ability to offer in-region long distance services (that is, services originating in the states where we operate as a local exchange carrier) is largely dependent on satisfying specified requirements. The requirements include a 14-point “competitive checklist” of steps which we must take to help competitors offer local services through resale, through purchase of unbundled network elements (UNEs), or by interconnecting their own networks to ours. We must also demonstrate to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that entry into the in-region long distance market would be in the public interest.

On December 22, 1999 and July 23, 2001, the FCC released orders approving our applications for permission to enter the in-region long distance markets in New York and Connecticut, respectively. In-region long distance is being offered in these states by a separate non-regulated subsidiary of Verizon.

1

Table of Contents

Verizon New York Inc.

FCC Regulation and Interstate Rates

We are subject to the jurisdiction of the FCC with respect to interstate services and related matters. In 2002, the FCC continued to implement reforms to the interstate access charge system and to implement the “universal service” and other requirements of the 1996 Act.

Access Charges and Universal Service

On May 31, 2000, the FCC adopted the Coalition for Affordable Local and Long Distance Services (CALLS) plan as a comprehensive five-year plan for regulation of interstate access charges. The CALLS plan has three main components. First, it establishes a portable interstate access universal service support of $650 million for the industry. This explicit support replaces implicit support embedded in interstate access charges. Second, the plan simplifies the patchwork of common line charges into one subscriber line charge (SLC) and provides for de-averaging of the SLC by zones and class of customers in a manner that will not undermine comparable and affordable universal service. Third, the plan sets into place a mechanism to transition to a set target of $0.0055 per minute for switched access services. Once that target rate is reached, local exchange carriers are no longer required to make further annual price cap reductions to their switched access prices. The annual reductions leading to the target rate, as well as annual reductions for the subset of special access services that remain subject to price cap regulation was set at 6.5% per year.

On September 10, 2001, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled on an appeal of the FCC order adopting the plan. The court upheld the FCC on several challenges to the order, but remanded two aspects of the decision back to the FCC on the grounds that they lacked sufficient justification. The court remanded back to the FCC for further consideration its decision setting the annual reduction factor at 6.5% minus an inflation factor and the size of the new universal service fund at $650 million. The entire plan (including these elements) will continue in effect pending the FCC’s further consideration of its justification of these components. As a result of tariff adjustments which became effective in July 2002, we reached the $0.0055 benchmark.

The FCC has adopted rules for special access services that provide for pricing flexibility and ultimately the removal of services from price regulation when prescribed competitive thresholds are met. In order to use these rules, carriers must forego the ability to take advantage of provisions in the current rules that provide relief in the event earnings fall below prescribed thresholds. Verizon has been authorized to remove special access and dedicated transport services from price caps in 36 Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in the former Bell Atlantic territory and in 17 additional MSAs in the former GTE territory. In addition, the FCC has found that in 20 MSAs Verizon has met the stricter standards to remove special access connections to end-user customers from price caps. Verizon also has an application pending that, if granted, would remove an additional three MSAs, and special access connections to end-user customers in two additional MSAs, from price cap regulation.

In November 1999, the FCC adopted a new mechanism for providing universal service support to high cost areas served by large local telephone companies. This funding mechanism provides additional support for local telephone services in several states served by Verizon, but not New York and Connecticut. This system has been supplemented by the new FCC access charge plan described above. On July 31, 2001, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit reversed and remanded to the FCC for further proceedings. The court concluded that the FCC had failed to adequately explain some aspects of its decision and had failed to address any need for a state universal service mechanism. The current universal service mechanism remains in place pending the outcome of any FCC review as a result of these appeals.

Unbundling of Network Elements

In November 1999, the FCC announced its decision setting forth new unbundling requirements, eliminating elements that it had previously required to be unbundled, limiting the obligation to provide others and adding new elements.

In addition to the unbundling requirements released in November 1999, the FCC released an order in a separate proceeding in December 1999, requiring incumbent local exchange companies also to unbundle and provide to competitors the higher frequency portion of their local loop. This provides competitors with the ability to provision data services on top of incumbent carriers’ voice services.

2

Table of Contents

Verizon New York Inc.

In July 2000, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit found that some aspects of the FCC’s requirements for pricing UNEs were inconsistent with the 1996 Act. In particular, it found that the FCC was wrong to require incumbent carriers to base these prices not on their real costs but on the imaginary costs of the most efficient equipment and the most efficient network configuration. This portion of the court’s decision was stayed pending review by the U.S. Supreme Court. On May 13, 2002, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed that decision and upheld the FCC’s pricing rules.

On May 24, 2002, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit released an order that overturned the most recent FCC decision establishing which network elements were required to be unbundled. In particular, the court found that the FCC did not adequately consider the limitations of the “necessary and impair” standards of the 1996 Act when it chose national rules for unbundling and that it failed to consider the relevance of competition from other types of service providers, including cable and satellite. The court also vacated a separate order that had authorized an unbundling requirement for “line sharing” where a competing carrier purchases only a portion of the copper connection to the end-user in order to provide high-speed broadband services using digital subscriber line (DSL) technology. Several parties, including the FCC, petitioned the court for rehearing of the court order. The court rejected the petitions that asked it to change its decision on September 4, 2002. The court did, however, stay its order vacating the FCC’s rules until February 20, 2003, to provide the FCC time to complete an ongoing rulemaking to determine what elements should be unbundled. Several carriers have sought U.S. Supreme Court review of the underlying court decision. That request remains pending.

On October 25, 2002, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit released an order upholding the FCC’s decisions that established interim limits on the availability of combinations of UNEs known as enhanced extended links or “EELs.” EELs consist of unbundled loops and transport elements. The FCC decisions limited access to EELs to carriers that would use them to provide a significant amount of local traffic, and not just use them as substitutes for special access services.

Prior to the issuance of these orders from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, the FCC had already begun a review of the scope of its unbundling requirement through a rulemaking referred to as the triennial review of UNEs. This rulemaking reopens the question of what network elements must be made available on an unbundled basis under the 1996 Act and will revisit the unbundling decisions made in the order overturned by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. In this rulemaking, the FCC also will address other pending issues relating to unbundled elements, including the question of whether competing carriers may substitute combinations of unbundled loops and transport for already competitive special access services. On February 20, 2003, the FCC announced a decision in its triennial review of UNEs, but the order has not yet been released.

Compensation for Internet Traffic

On April 27, 2001, the FCC released an order addressing intercarrier compensation for dial-up connections for Internet-bound traffic. The FCC found that Internet-bound traffic is interstate and subject to the FCC’s jurisdiction. Moreover, the FCC again found that Internet-bound traffic is not subject to reciprocal compensation under Section 251(b)(5) of the 1996 Act. Instead, the FCC established federal rates per minute for this traffic that decline from $0.0015 to $0.0007 over a three-year period. The FCC order also sets caps on the total minutes of this traffic that may be subject to any intercarrier compensation and requires that incumbent local exchange carriers must offer to both bill and pay reciprocal compensation for local traffic at the same rate as they are required to pay on Internet-bound traffic. On May 3, 2002, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit rejected part of the FCC’s rationale for its April 27, 2001 order, but declined to vacate the order while it is on remand.

Several parties requested rehearing, asking the court to vacate the underlying order. Those requests were denied in a series of orders released on September 24, 2002 and September 25, 2002. One carrier has sought U.S. Supreme Court review of that denial. In the meantime, pending further action by the FCC, the FCC’s underlying order remains in effect.

State Regulation of Rates and Services

New York

The New York State Public Service Commission (NYSPSC) has adopted a new incentive plan to regulate our services, effective March 1, 2002. The plan provides pricing flexibility, adopts new service quality standards and does not restrict our earnings. The plan will expire in 2004, except that the service quality provisions of the plan will expire in 2005.

3

Table of Contents

Verizon New York Inc.

The new plan:

On January 28, 2002, the NYSPSC issued an order mandating substantial reductions in the rates that we may charge local exchange competitors for access to UNEs.

On January 22, 2003, the NYSPSC, noting that current FCC and NYSPSC cost allocation and accounting safeguards imposed on us offer strong protection against abusive affiliate transactions, granted our request to terminate an 11-year old set of structural safeguards that restricted transactions between us and Verizon’s other affiliates.

Connecticut

Our operations in Connecticut have been subject to rate of return regulation. In February 2001, the Department of Public Utility Control adopted an incentive regulation plan proposed by us, which eliminates regulation of earnings and provides other deregulatory benefits.

COMPETITION

Current and potential competitors in telecommunication services include long distance companies, other local telephone companies, cable companies, wireless service providers, foreign telecommunications providers, electric utilities, Internet service providers and other companies that offer network services. Many of these companies have a strong market presence, brand recognition and existing customer relationships, all of which contribute to intensifying competition and may affect our future revenue growth.

Local Exchange Services

The ability to offer local exchange services has historically been subject to regulation by state regulatory commissions. Applications from competitors to provide and resell local exchange services have been approved by NYSPSC. The 1996 Act has significantly increased the level of competition in our local exchange markets.

One of the purposes of the 1996 Act was to ensure, and accelerate, the emergence of competition in local exchange markets. Toward this end, the 1996 Act requires most existing local exchange carriers (incumbent local exchange carriers, or ILECs), including our company, to permit potential competitors (CLECs) to:

As a result, competition in our local exchange markets continues to increase. We are generally required to sell our services to CLECs at discounts from the prices we charge our retail customers. The NYSPSC has mandated reductions in the rates we charge local exchange competitors for access to UNEs. See “State Regulation of Rates and Services.”

4

Table of Contents

Verizon New York Inc.

Long Distance Services

We offer intraLATA long distance services. IntraLATA toll calls originate and terminate within the same LATA, but generally cover a greater distance than a local call. State regulatory commissions rather than federal authorities generally regulate these services. Federal regulators have jurisdiction over interstate toll services. The NYSPSC permits other carriers to offer intraLATA toll services within the state.

Alternative Access Services

A substantial portion of our revenues from business and government customers is derived from a relatively small number of large, multiple-line subscribers.

We face competition from alternative communications systems, constructed by large end-users, interexchange carriers and alternative access vendors, which are capable of originating and/or terminating calls without the use of our plant. The FCC’s orders requiring us to offer collocated interconnection for special and switched access services have enhanced the ability of such alternative access providers to compete with us.

Other potential sources of competition include cable television systems, shared tenant services and other noncarrier systems which are capable of bypassing our local plant, either partially or completely, through substitution of special access for switched access or through concentration of telecommunications traffic on fewer of our lines.

Wireless Services

Wireless services also constitute a significant source of competition to our wireline telecommunications services, especially as wireless carriers (including Verizon Wireless) expand and improve their network coverage and continue to lower their prices to end-users. As a result, more end-users are substituting wireless services for basic wireline service. Wireless telephone services can also be used for data transmission.

Public Telephone Services

The growth of wireless communications has significantly decreased usage of public telephones, as more customers are substituting wireless services for public telephone services. In addition, we face competition from other providers of public telephone services.

Operator Services

Our operator services product line faces competition from alternative operator services providers and Internet service providers.

RECENT DEVELOPMENT

New York Recovery Funding

In August 2002, President Bush signed the Supplemental Appropriations bill passed earlier this year by the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate. The Supplemental Appropriations bill includes $5.5 billion in New York recovery funding. Of that amount, approximately $750 million has been allocated to cover the uninsured losses of businesses (including the restoration of utility infrastructure) as a result of the September 11th terrorist attacks. These funds will be distributed through the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation following an application process.

5

Table of Contents

Verizon New York Inc.

Item 2. Properties

GENERAL

Our principal properties do not lend themselves to simple description by character and location. Our investment in plant, property and equipment consisted of the following at December 31:

“Central office equipment” consists of switching equipment, transmission equipment and related facilities. “Outside communications plant” consists primarily of aerial cable, underground cable, conduit and wiring, and telephone poles. “Land and buildings” consists of land and land improvements, and principally central office buildings. “Furniture, vehicles and other work equipment” consists of public telephone instruments and telephone equipment, furniture, office equipment, motor vehicles and other work equipment. “Other” property consists primarily of plant under construction, capital leases, capitalized computer software costs and leasehold improvements.

All of our properties, located in the states of New York and Connecticut, are generally in good operating condition and are adequate to satisfy the needs of our business. Substantially all of our assets are subject to lien under our refunding mortgage bond indenture securing funded debt. We have elected to redeem the last remaining series of refunding mortgage bonds on March 6, 2003. Thereafter, the lien of our refunding mortgage bond indenture will be discharged.

Our customers are served by electronic switching systems that provide a wide variety of services. Our network has full digital capability to furnish advanced data transmission and information management services.

CAPITAL EXPENDITURES

We continue to make significant capital expenditures to meet the demand for communications services and to further improve such services. Capital spending was approximately $1.6 billion in 2002, $2.5 billion in 2001 and $2.2 billion in 2000. Capital spending for those years excludes capitalized non-network software and additions under capital leases. Our total investment in plant, property and equipment was approximately $28.6 billion at December 31, 2002, $27.5 billion at December 31, 2001 and $25.7 billion at December 31, 2000, including the effect of retirements, but before deducting accumulated depreciation.

There were no proceedings reportable under Item 3.

(Omitted pursuant to General Instruction I(2).)

6

Table of Contents

Verizon New York Inc.

PART II

Not applicable.

(Omitted pursuant to General Instruction I(2).)

7

Table of Contents

Verizon New York Inc.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations

   (Abbreviated pursuant to General Instruction I(2).)

This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements listed in the index set forth on page F-1.

OVERVIEW

Description of Business

Verizon New York Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Empire City Subway Company, are wholly owned subsidiaries of NYNEX Corporation (NYNEX), which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Verizon Communications Inc. (Verizon). Empire City Subway Company is primarily in the business of leasing underground conduit in Manhattan and the Bronx, principally to us, but also to other companies in the telecommunications business.

We presently serve a territory consisting of Local Access and Transport Areas (LATAs) in New York, as well as a small portion of Connecticut (Greenwich and Byran only). We have one reportable segment which provides domestic wireline telecommunications services. We currently provide two basic types of telecommunications services:

The communications services we provide are subject to regulation by the New York State Public Service Commission (NYSPSC) and the Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control (CDPUC) with respect to intrastate rates and services and other matters. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulates rates that we charge long distance carriers and end-user subscribers for interstate access services. For a further discussion of the Company and our regulatory plans, see Item 1—“Description of Business.”

Critical Accounting Policies

A summary of the critical accounting policies used in preparing our financial statements are as follows:

Most of our employees participate in Verizon’s defined benefit pension plans and postretirement benefit plans. In the aggregate, the fair value of pension plan assets exceeds pension plan benefit obligations. Significant pension and postretirement benefit plan assumptions, including the discount rate used, the long-term rate of return on plan assets, and medical cost trend rates are periodically updated and impact the amount of pension plan results, assets and obligations. For more information on pension plan assumptions, see Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements.

Our current and deferred income taxes and associated valuation allowances (if any) are impacted by events and transactions arising in the normal course of business, as well as in connection with special and non-recurring items. Assessment of the appropriate amount and classification of income taxes is dependent on several factors, including estimates of the timing and realization of deferred income tax assets and the timing of income tax payments. Actual collections and payments may differ from these estimates as a result of changes in tax laws, as well as unanticipated future transactions impacting related income tax balances.

We compute depreciation on plant, property, and equipment principally on the composite group remaining life method and straight-line composite rates over estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to 50 years. This method provides for the recognition of the cost of the remaining net investment in telephone plant, less anticipated net salvage value (if any), over the remaining asset lives. This method requires the periodic revision of depreciation rates. For a discussion of a change in the accounting for the retirement of certain assets see “Other Matters—Recent Accounting Pronouncements—Asset

8

Table of Contents

Verizon New York Inc.

Retirement Obligations” below. Changes in the estimated useful lives of plant, property, and equipment or depreciation methods could have a material effect on our results of operations.

We recognize service revenues based upon usage of our local exchange network and facilities and contract fees. We recognize product and other service revenues when the products are delivered and accepted by the customers and when services are provided in accordance with contract terms.

In the course of conducting our business, we provide services to and purchase goods and services from affiliated companies. These transactions are supported by tariff rates or contractual agreements the terms of which require estimates and judgments to fairly value such transactions.

All of our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

We reported net income of $38.6 million in 2002, compared to net income of $61.1 million in 2001. Our reported results included the following special items:

Employee Terminations

The following table provides a summary of the special charges recorded in 2002 and 2001 related to employee terminations.

As part of a Verizon workforce reduction plan, we have continued to reduce our headcount as allowed under various management and associate employee benefit plans. As a result, we recorded $191.9 million and $354.0 million in 2002 and 2001, respectively, in connection with various pension and retirement benefit enhancements. Also during 2002, we recorded a $90.2 million pension settlement loss as lump-sum payments exceeded the threshold of service and interest costs. Additionally, in the fourth quarter of 2002, we recorded a curtailment loss of $206.1 million associated with a significant reduction of the expected years of future service of present employees, which was largely impacted by the involuntary employee terminations in December 2002. The special termination benefits, curtailment and settlement of pension obligations are recorded in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 88, “Employers’ Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits” and SFAS No. 106, “Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions.”

Also during 2002 and 2001, we recorded special charges of $187.8 million and $222.0 million, respectively, for the voluntary and involuntary separation of management and associate employees in accordance with SFAS No. 112, “Employers’ Accounting for Postemployment Benefits.” As of December 31, 2002, a total of over 6,500 employees have been separated under the 2001 and 2002 severance programs. We expect to complete the termination of the employees within a year of when the respective charges were recorded. Employee benefit costs are recorded in operations and support expense in our consolidated statements of income.

See Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information about our employee benefits.

9

Table of Contents

Verizon New York Inc.

WorldCom Inc.

In 2002, we recorded an impairment charge of $10.4 million driven by our financial statement exposure to WorldCom Inc. (WorldCom). This charge was recorded in operations and support expense in our consolidated statements of income.

WorldCom, including its affiliates, purchases dedicated local exchange capacity from us to support its private networks and we also charge WorldCom for access to our local network. In addition, we sell local wholesale interconnection services and provide billing and collection services to WorldCom. We purchase long distance and related services from WorldCom. On July 21, 2002, WorldCom filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

During 2002, we recorded revenues earned from the provision of primarily network access services to WorldCom of $501.1 million. If WorldCom terminates contracts with us for the provision of services, our operating revenues would be lower in future periods. Lower revenues as a result of canceling contracts for the provision of services could be partially offset, in some cases, by the migration of customers on the terminated facilities to us or other carriers who purchase capacity and/or interconnection services from us.

At December 31, 2002, accounts receivable from WorldCom, net of a provision for uncollectibles, was $68.6 million. We continue to closely monitor our collections on WorldCom account balances. WorldCom is current with respect to its post-bankruptcy obligations. We believe that we are adequately reserved for the potential risk of non-payment of pre-bankruptcy receivables from WorldCom.

Accounting for the Impact of the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attacks

The primary financial statement impact of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks pertains to our plant, equipment and administrative office space located either in, or adjacent to the World Trade Center complex in New York City, and the associated service restoration efforts. During the year ended December 31, 2001, we recorded an estimate of equipment losses and costs incurred associated with service disruption and restoration of approximately $570 million. In addition, we accrued an insurance recovery of approximately $390 million, resulting in a pre-tax income impact of $180 million recorded in operations and support expense in our consolidated statements of income. The costs and estimated insurance recovery were recorded in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 01-10, “Accounting for the Impact of the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001.” In 2002, we recorded an additional insurance recovery of approximately $150 million, primarily offsetting the replacement of fixed assets and expenses incurred in 2002, such that net income in 2002 was not materially impacted by the losses and expenses incurred. As of December 31, 2002, we received insurance proceeds of approximately $350 million.

In August 2002, President Bush signed the Supplemental Appropriations bill passed earlier this year by the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate. The Supplemental Appropriations bill includes $5.5 billion in New York recovery funding. Of that amount, approximately $750 million has been allocated to cover the uninsured losses of businesses (including the restoration of utility infrastructure) as a result of the September 11th terrorist attacks. These funds will be distributed through the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation following an application process.

Other Charges

In 2002, we reversed a prior year accrual in connection with our new incentive regulation plan resulting in a reduction in operating expense of approximately $75 million.

10

Table of Contents

Verizon New York Inc.

Extraordinary Items

During 2002, we recorded extraordinary charges associated with the early extinguishment of long-term debt, which reduced net income by $86,700 (net of an income tax benefit of $46,700). These debt extinguishments consisted of $130.0 million of 4 5/8% refunding mortgage bonds due on January 1, 2004 and $75.0 million of 6% refunding mortgage bonds due on September 1, 2007.

During 2001, we recorded extraordinary charges associated with the early extinguishment of long-term debt, which reduced net income by $9.4 million (net of an income tax benefit of $5.1 million). These debt extinguishments consisted of the following:

Transactions with Affiliates

Our financial statements include transactions with affiliates. The more significant affiliate transactions include fees earned from Verizon Yellow Pages Company for the use of our name in soliciting directory advertising and in publishing and distributing directories. We also earn revenues from Verizon Internet Services Inc., Verizon Advanced Data Inc., Verizon Services, Verizon Long Distance, Verizon Wireless Inc. and Verizon Global Networks Inc. for utilization of our network facilities and provision of services.

In addition, our operating revenues and expenses include transactions with other Verizon Operating Telephone Companies primarily for the rental of facilities and equipment and interconnection services.

Further, we recognize operating expenses in connection with contractual arrangements with affiliates, primarily Verizon Services, for the provision of various centralized services to us. We recognize interest income and interest expense in connection with contractual agreements with Verizon Network Funding Corporation, Verizon Global Funding Corporation and Bell Atlantic Administrative Services, Inc. for the provision of short-term financing and cash management services. We recognize equity income from our investment in Verizon Services Group. We also pay quarterly dividends to our parent, NYNEX.

See Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information about our transactions with affiliates.

These and other items affecting the comparison of our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 are discussed in the following sections.

11

Table of Contents

Verizon New York Inc.

OPERATING REVENUES

(Dollars in Millions)

LOCAL SERVICES

Local service revenues are earned from the provision of local exchange, local private line, wire maintenance, voice messaging and value-added services. Value-added services are a family of services that expand the utilization of the network, including products such as Caller ID, Call Waiting and Return Call. The provision of local exchange services not only includes retail revenues, but also includes local wholesale revenues from unbundled network elements (UNEs), interconnection revenues from competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs), certain data transport revenues and wireless interconnection revenues.

The decline in local service revenues in 2002 was primarily due to the effect of lower demand and usage of our basic wireline services. Our switched access lines in service declined 4.5% from December 31, 2001 to December 31, 2002, primarily reflecting the impact of the economic slowdown and competition. Technology substitution has also affected local service revenue growth, as indicated by lower demand for residential access lines. In addition, the net effect of mandated price reductions on UNEs, partially offset by rate increases for basic retail services as prescribed under a new incentive regulation plan further contributed to the decline in local service revenues in 2002.

For additional information on the Company’s new incentive regulation plan, see “Item 1. – State Regulation of Rates and Services.”

NETWORK ACCESS SERVICES

Network access service revenues are earned from end-user subscribers and from long distance and other competing carriers who use our local exchange facilities to provide usage services to their customers. Switched access revenues are derived from fixed and usage-based charges paid by carriers for access to our local network. Special access revenues originate from carriers and end-users that buy dedicated local exchange capacity to support their private networks. End-user access revenues are earned from our customers and from resellers who purchase dial-tone services.

The increase in network access revenues in 2002 was mainly attributable to higher customer demand for special access services. This growth primarily reflects a strong demand in the business market for high-capacity, high-speed digital services. In addition, the reversal of an accrual in the second quarter of 2002 in connection with our new incentive regulation plan also contributed to the increase in network access service revenues.

These increases were substantially offset by lower demand for switched access and end-user services due, in part, to the weakened economy and technology substitution. In addition, mandated price reductions on interstate and intrastate services and other regulatory decisions, and a one-time billing settlement with a carrier further offset the increase in network access revenues.

12

Table of Contents

Verizon New York Inc.

LONG DISTANCE SERVICES

Long distance revenues are earned primarily from calls made to points outside a customer’s local calling area, but within our service area (intraLATA toll). IntraLATA toll calls originate and terminate within the same LATA, but generally cover a greater distance than a local call. These services are regulated by state regulatory commissions except where they cross state lines. Other long distance services that we provide include 800 services and Wide Area Telephone Service (WATS). We also earn revenue from private line and operator services associated with long distance calls.

Long distance service revenues declined in 2002 primarily due to the effect of competition and toll discount packages and product bundling offers of our intraLATA toll services. Technology substitution and lower access line growth due to the slowing economy also affected long distance service revenue growth.

OTHER SERVICES

Our other services include such services as billing and collections for long distance carriers and affiliates, facilities rentals to affiliates and nonaffiliates, public (pay) telephone and customer premises equipment (CPE). Amounts recognized in connection with obligations and commitments for regulatory matters, if any, are also included in this revenue category. Other service revenues also include payments from an affiliate, Verizon Yellow Pages Company (Yellow Pages), for earnings related to its directory activities in New York. We also earn revenues from Yellow Pages for the use of our name in soliciting directory advertising and in publishing and distributing directories and from customers for nonpublication of telephone numbers and multiple white page listings.

Other service revenues decreased in 2002 primarily due to the effect of a one-time reclassification in 2001 associated with regulatory-related activities. In addition, lower revenues from our pay phone services due to technology substitution and a decrease in affiliated billing and collections further reduced other services revenues in 2002.

These decreases were partially offset by an increase in directory revenues from end-users due to the new packaging of plans with unlimited directory services.

OPERATING EXPENSES

(Dollars in Millions)

OPERATIONS AND SUPPORT

Operations and support expenses consist of employee costs and other operating expenses. Employee costs consist of salaries, wages and other employee compensation, employee benefits and payroll taxes. Other operating expenses consist of contract services including centralized services expenses allocated from affiliates, rent, network software costs, operating taxes other than income, the provision for uncollectible accounts receivable, reciprocal compensation, and other costs.

The decrease in operations and support expenses was partially attributable to lower service restoration costs in 2002, as compared to 2001, related to the events of September 11, 2001 (see Results of Operations “Accounting for the Impact of the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attacks”). In addition, the effect of a one-time reclassification in 2001 associated with regulatory-related activities and lower interconnection costs also decreased operations and support expenses. Further, in 2002, we reversed a

13

Table of Contents

Verizon New York Inc.

prior year accrual in connection with our new incentive regulation plan resulting in a reduction in operating expenses of approximately $75 million.

As described earlier, we recorded charges of $676.0 million in 2002, compared to $576.0 million in 2001, associated with employee termination costs. Pension income (after consideration of capitalized costs and excluding special termination charges) was $363.5 million and $390.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. These employee cost increases were partially offset by the effect of declining workforce levels.

DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION

Depreciation and amortization expense increased in 2002, as compared to 2001, primarily due to growth in depreciable telephone plant. This increase was partially offset by the effect of lower rates of depreciation.

OTHER RESULTS

(Dollars in Millions)

OTHER INCOME, NET

Other income, net includes equity income (losses), interest income and other nonoperating income and expense items. We have an investment in Verizon Services Group, which we account for under the equity method. Verizon Services Group operates in conjunction with Verizon Services Corp. and Verizon Corporate Services Group Inc. (collectively known as Verizon Services) to provide various centralized services on behalf of the subsidiaries of Verizon.

The decrease in other income, net, was primarily attributable to lower interest income principally resulting from the effect of additional interest income recognized in 2001 associated with the settlement of a tax-related matter. This decrease was partially offset by higher equity income recognized from our investment in Verizon Services Group in 2002.

INTEREST EXPENSE

Interest expense includes costs associated with borrowing and capital leases, net of capitalized interest costs. We capitalize interest associated with the acquisition or construction of plant assets. Capitalized interest is reported as a cost of plant and a reduction in interest expense.

Interest expense increased in 2002, as compared to 2001, primarily as a result of higher levels of long-term debt and lower capitalized interest costs resulting from lower levels of average telephone plant under construction. These increases were substantially offset by lower interest rates and lower average levels of short-term debt with an affiliate in 2002.

See Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information about our debt.

14

Table of Contents

Verizon New York Inc.

EFFECTIVE INCOME TAX RATES

The effective income tax rate is the provision for income taxes as a percentage of income before provision for income taxes and extraordinary items. Our effective income tax rate was lower in 2002, as compared to 2001, primarily due to the effects of lower pre-tax income and an increase in non-taxable equity income from our investment in Verizon Services Group.

You can find a reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to the effective income tax rate for each period in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements.

OTHER MATTERS

In-Region Long Distance

Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, our ability to offer in-region long distance services (that is, services originating in the states where we operate as a local exchange carrier) is largely dependent on satisfying specified requirements. The requirements include a 14-point “competitive checklist” of steps which we must take to help competitors offer local services through resale, through purchase of UNEs, or by interconnecting their own networks to ours. We must also demonstrate to the FCC that entry into the in-region long distance market would be in the public interest.

On December 22, 1999 and July 23, 2001, the FCC released orders approving our applications for permission to enter the in-region long distance markets in New York and Connecticut, respectively. In-region long distance service is being offered in these states by a separate non-regulated subsidiary of Verizon.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Accounting for Stock Options

In December 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure.” This standard amends SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, this statement amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. This statement permits two additional transition methods (modified prospective and retroactive restatement) for entities that adopt the preferable method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation.

We participate in employee compensation plans sponsored by Verizon with awards of Verizon common stock. Effective January 1, 2003, Verizon adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, using the prospective method, for all new awards granted to employees after January 1, 2003. Under the prospective method, employee compensation expense in the first year will be recognized for new awards granted, modified, or settled. However, in subsequent years, the vesting of awards issued on or after January 1, 2003 may cause an increase in employee compensation expense.

Asset Retirement Obligations

On January 1, 2003, we adopted SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.” This standard provides the accounting for the cost of legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets. SFAS No. 143 requires that companies recognize the fair value of a liability for asset retirement obligations in the period in which the obligations are incurred and capitalize that amount as part of the book value of the long-lived asset. We have determined that we do not have a material legal obligation to remove long-lived assets as described by this statement. However, we have included estimated removal costs in our group depreciation models. These costs have increased depreciation expense and

15

Table of Contents

Verizon New York Inc.

accumulated depreciation for future removal costs for existing assets. These removal costs are recorded as a reduction to accumulated depreciation when the assets are retired and removal costs are incurred.

For some assets, such as telephone poles, the removal costs exceed salvage value. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 143, we are required to exclude costs of removal from our depreciation rates for assets for which the removal costs exceed salvage. Accordingly, in connection with the initial adoption of this standard on January 1, 2003, we have reversed accrued costs of removal in excess of salvage from our accumulated depreciation accounts for these assets. The adjustment was recorded as a cumulative effect of an accounting change, resulting in the recognition of a gain of approximately $800 million ($519 million after-tax). Effective January 1, 2003, we began expensing costs of removal in excess of salvage for these assets as incurred. The impact of this change in accounting will result in a decrease in depreciation expense and an increase in operations and support expense. We estimate the net favorable impact in 2003, excluding the cumulative effect adjustment, will be approximately $20 million to $30 million.

Debt Extinguishment

In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, “Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections.” SFAS No. 145, among other things, eliminates the requirement that all gains and losses on the extinguishment of debt must be classified as extraordinary items on the income statement, thereby permitting the classification of such gains and losses as extraordinary items only if the criteria of Accounting Principles Board (APB) No. 30 are met. We are required to adopt this provision of SFAS No. 145 effective January 1, 2003 and, upon adoption, we will reclassify in our statements of income previously reported extraordinary charges for the early extinguishment of debt to income from continuing operations.

Exit or Disposal Activities

In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.” This standard addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies EITF Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring).” EITF Issue No. 94-3 required accrual of liabilities related to exit and disposal activities at a plan (commitment) date. SFAS No. 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. The provisions of this standard are effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002.

Contractual Obligations

The following table provides a summary of our contractual obligations at December 31, 2002. Additional detail about these items is included in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

Subsequent Events

On December 5, 2002, we declared a dividend in the amount of $72.0 million. The dividend was paid to our parent, NYNEX on February 3, 2003.

On March 6, 2003, we redeemed the entire outstanding principal amount of our $100.0 million 4 7/8% refunding mortgage bond, due on January 1, 2006, which is the last remaining series of refunding mortgage bonds. Thereafter, the lien of the refunding mortgage bond indenture will be discharged. This redemption will not result in a material charge to results of operations.

16

Table of Contents

Verizon New York Inc.

We are exposed to interest rate risk in the normal course of our business. The majority of our debt is fixed rate debt and we did not have any derivatives as of December 31, 2002 and 2001. Our short-term borrowings from an affiliate expose our earnings to changes in short-term interest rates since the interest rate charged on such borrowings is typically fixed for less than one month.

The following table summarizes the fair values of our long-term debt as of December 31, 2002 and 2001. The table also provides a sensitivity analysis of the estimated fair values of these financial instruments assuming 100-basis-point upward and downward parallel shifts in the yield curve. The sensitivity analysis did not include the fair values of our short-term borrowings from an affiliate since they are not significantly affected by changes in market interest rates.

The information required by this Item is set forth on Pages F-1 through F-29.

Not applicable.

PART III

(Omitted pursuant to General Instruction I(2).)

(Omitted pursuant to General Instruction I(2).)

(Omitted pursuant to General Instruction I(2).)

(Omitted pursuant to General Instruction I(2).)

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this annual report (Evaluation Date), that ensure that information relating to the registrant which is required to be disclosed in this report is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within required time periods. They have concluded that as of the Evaluation Date, the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and effective to ensure that material information relating to the registrant and its consolidated subsidiaries would be made known to them by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report was being prepared.

17

Table of Contents

Verizon New York Inc.

(b) Changes in Internal Controls

There were no significant changes in the registrant’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the Evaluation Date, nor were there any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in these controls requiring corrective actions.

PART IV

(1) Financial Statements

See Index to Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule appearing on Page F-1.

(2) Financial Statement Schedules

See Index to Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule appearing on Page F-1.

(3) Exhibits

Exhibits identified in parentheses below, on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), are incorporated herein by reference as exhibits hereto.

A Current Report on Form 8-K was furnished on November 13, 2002, containing certification statements to the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to Exchange Act filings, signed by the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer and by the Chief Financial Officer and Controller.

18

Table of Contents

Verizon New York Inc.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

19

Table of Contents

Verizon New York Inc.

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Lawrence T. Babbio, Jr., certify that:

20

Table of Contents

Verizon New York Inc.

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Lawrence R. Whitman, certify that:

21

Table of Contents

Verizon New York Inc.

Index to Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule

Financial statement schedules other than those listed above have been omitted because such schedules are not required or applicable.

F-1

Table of Contents

Verizon New York Inc.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors and Shareowner

Verizon New York Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Verizon New York Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareowner’s investment, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule referenced in the index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and the financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and the financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Verizon New York Inc. at December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

F-2

Table of Contents

Verizon New York Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

For the Years Ended December 31

(Dollars in Millions)

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-3

Table of Contents

Verizon New York Inc.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in Millions)

ASSETS

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-4

Table of Contents

Verizon New York Inc.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in Millions)

LIABILITIES AND SHAREOWNER’S INVESTMENT

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-5

Table of Contents

Verizon New York Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREOWNER’S INVESTMENT

For the Years Ended December 31

(Dollars in Millions)

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-6

Table of Contents

Verizon New York Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the Years Ended December 31

(Dollars in Millions)