Back to GetFilings.com
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
x
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000
|
OR
¨
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from
to
Commission file number 0-14879
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| Delaware |
|
94-3078031 |
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
| |
| 1840 Gateway Drive |
|
|
| San Mateo, California |
|
94404 |
| (Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (650) 312-7200
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
| Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share |
|
New York Stock Exchange |
| 9.125% Subordinated Notes due 2007 |
|
New York Stock Exchange |
| 9.76% Capital Securities due 2018 |
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained
herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in a definitive proxy or information statement incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K ¨
As of February 28, 2001, there were outstanding 32,574,987 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock. The aggregate
market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, computed by reference to the closing price of such stock as of February 28, 2001, was $204,193,319. (The exclusion from such amount of the market value of the shares owned by
any person shall not be deemed an admission by the registrant that such person is an affiliate of the registrant).
FORM 10-K
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements which describe our future plans, strategies and expectations. All
forward-looking statements are based on assumptions and involve risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control and may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those that we anticipate. Factors
that might affect forward-looking statements include, among other things:
|
·
|
our ability to remain in compliance with written regulatory agreements with the government agencies that regulate
us;
|
|
·
|
our ability to maintain adequate capital or raise additional capital, if needed;
|
|
·
|
the demand for our products;
|
|
·
|
actions taken by our competitors;
|
|
·
|
tax rate changes, new tax laws and revised tax law interpretations;
|
|
·
|
adverse changes occurring in the securities markets;
|
|
·
|
inflation and changes in prevailing interest rates that reduce our margins or the fair value of the financial instruments we
hold;
|
|
·
|
economic or business conditions, either nationally or in our market areas, that are worse than we expect;
|
|
·
|
legislative or regulatory changes that adversely affect our business;
|
|
·
|
the timing, impact and other uncertainties of our asset sales or securitizations;
|
|
·
|
technological changes that are more difficult or expensive than we expect;
|
|
·
|
increases in delinquencies and defaults by our borrowers and other loan delinquencies;
|
|
·
|
increases in our provision for losses on loans and leases;
|
|
·
|
our inability to sustain or improve the performance of our subsidiaries;
|
|
·
|
our inability to achieve the financial goals in our strategic plans, including any financial goals related to both
contemplated and consummated asset sales or acquisitions;
|
|
·
|
the outcome of lawsuits or regulatory disputes;
|
|
·
|
credit and other risks of lending, leasing and investment activities; and
|
|
·
|
our inability to use the net operating loss carryforwards we currently have.
|
As a result of the above, we cannot assure you that our future results of operations or financial condition or any other
matters will be consistent with those presented in any forward-looking statements. Accordingly, we caution you not to rely on these forward-looking statements. We do not undertake, and specifically disclaim any obligation, to update these
forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made.
PART I
Item 1. Business
Bay View Capital Corporation, incorporated under the laws of the state of Delaware in 1989, is a bank holding company
headquartered in San Mateo, California. Our primary subsidiary is Bay View Bank, N.A., a commercial bank that operates 57 full service branches throughout the greater San Francisco Bay Area. (See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements
“Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”, at Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for further information on our subsidiaries).
Bay View Bank was organized in 1911 and became our wholly owned subsidiary when we became a holding company in 1989.
Prior to 1996, Bay View Bank generated a majority of its earnings from relatively low-yielding mortgage-based assets funded primarily by retail certificates of deposit. From 1996 to 1999, our strategy was to transform Bay View Bank from a thrift to
a commercial bank. During this period we nearly doubled in size, replaced a majority of our mortgage-based loans with higher-yielding consumer and commercial loans and leases and transformed a large portion of our deposits into low-cost transaction
accounts. In 1999, we officially converted to a national charter as a commercial bank.
Our commercial and consumer businesses and our deposit franchise expansion came primarily as a result of acquisitions.
In June 1996, we formed our auto lending division to provide financing options through auto dealers nationwide. In April 1997, we formed our commercial lending division to provide customized financing to emerging, small and middle-market businesses
throughout the country. And in January 1998, we acquired an additional 36 banking branches to become the largest deposit franchise operating exclusively in the San Francisco Bay Area.
In November 1999, we acquired Franchise Mortgage Acceptance Company, or FMAC, an established franchise lender, and its
wholly owned multi-family lending division, Bankers Mutual. In June 2000, we sold substantially all of the assets of Bankers Mutual to Berkshire Mortgage Finance Limited Partnership. In September 2000, we announced a restructuring of FMAC. The
performance of this division was considerably dependent upon gains from franchise loan securitizations and sales to offset overhead and other associated expenses. The opportunities for these transactions during 2000 were severely limited by
prevailing market conditions, which significantly reduced our earnings. As a result, we were forced to consider other viable options relative to FMAC, including the potential sale of the unit. After an unsuccessful attempt to sell FMAC, we decided
that an immediate and permanent shutdown of all franchise loan production was in the best interests of our shareholders. (See Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Note 3
to the Consolidated Financial Statements “Restructuring Charges” at Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for further details of our FMAC acquisition and subsequent restructuring).
During the second quarter of 2000, we retained the services of Merrill Lynch & Co. as our financial
advisor.
We incurred a consolidated net loss of $326.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2000, primarily as a result of our
decision to shut down our franchise lending division and the resultant revaluation of our franchise-related assets. The loss for 2000 also adversely impacted our regulatory capital levels as follows:
Bay View Bank
| |
|
At December 31, 2000
|
|
At December 31, 1999
|
| |
|
Actual
|
|
Minimum
Requirement
|
|
Actual
|
|
Minimum
Requirement
|
| |
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Tier 1 leverage |
|
$218,736 |
|
4.23 |
% |
|
$206,835 |
|
4.00 |
% |
|
$406,001 |
|
6.87 |
% |
|
$236,337 |
|
4.00 |
% |
| Tier 1 risk-based |
|
$218,736 |
|
6.30 |
% |
|
$138,875 |
|
4.00 |
% |
|
$406,001 |
|
8.41 |
% |
|
$193,024 |
|
4.00 |
% |
| Total risk-based |
|
$312,582 |
|
9.00 |
% |
|
$277,751 |
|
8.00 |
% |
|
$507,516 |
|
10.52 |
% |
|
$386,048 |
|
8.00 |
% |
Bay View Capital Corporation
| |
|
At December 31, 2000
|
|
At December 31, 1999
|
| |
|
Actual
|
|
Minimum
Requirement
|
|
Actual
|
|
Minimum
Requirement
|
| |
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Tier 1 leverage |
|
$190,686 |
|
3.47 |
% |
|
$219,886 |
|
4.00 |
% |
|
$386,110 |
|
6.51 |
% |
|
$237,247 |
|
4.00 |
% |
| Tier 1 risk-based |
|
$190,686 |
|
4.59 |
% |
|
$166,284 |
|
4.00 |
% |
|
$386,110 |
|
7.17 |
% |
|
$215,475 |
|
4.00 |
% |
| Total risk-based |
|
$338,374 |
|
8.14 |
% |
|
$332,568 |
|
8.00 |
% |
|
$587,773 |
|
10.91 |
% |
|
$430,950 |
|
8.00 |
% |
Because of losses we began to incur in the second quarter of 2000 and the decline in our capital ratios, Bay View Bank
entered into a written agreement with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, sometimes referred to as the OCC, pursuant to 12 U.S.C. Section 1818(b) on September 6, 2000, and we entered into a written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank
of San Francisco pursuant to 12 U.S.C. Section 1818(b) on September 29, 2000.
The OCC agreement requires, among other matters, that Bay View Bank:
|
·
|
Adopt a new strategic plan establishing objectives for Bay View Bank’s overall risk profile, earnings performance,
growth, balance sheet mix, liability structure, capital adequacy and reduction of nonperforming assets;
|
|
·
|
Consider whether management changes should be made;
|
|
·
|
Develop a plan for the maintenance of adequate capital and the raising of additional capital, including a prohibition on the
payment of any dividends without the prior approval of the OCC; and
|
|
·
|
Review its risk management program with a view to reduction of the high level of credit risk in Bay View Bank.
|
The Federal Reserve Bank agreement, among other matters:
|
·
|
Prohibits the payment of any dividends without prior approval of the Federal Reserve Bank; and
|
|
·
|
Requires the development of a plan to maintain capital adequacy and raise additional capital.
|
Our capital plan has yet to be approved by the Federal Reserve Board. At this time, the financial impact, if any, of the
regulatory actions that may result from our failure to meet the minimum capital requirements cannot be determined.
Our principal business activity as a commercial bank is to earn interest on loans, leases and investment securities that
are funded by customer deposits and other borrowings. The difference between interest received and interest paid comprises the majority of our operating earnings. Our primary lending activities consist of multi-family and commercial real estate
lending, consumer auto and home equity lending, and commercial business financing. Our 57-branch deposit franchise provides personalized banking services to individuals and businesses and is the significant source of funding for our lending
operations. The operating results of our major business segments are accounted for and presented by platform. (See Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for further details and
financial information related to our Retail Platform and our Commercial Platform).
Real Estate Lending
At December 31, 2000, real estate loans totaled $1.3 billion, representing 42.7% of our gross loan and lease portfolio.
The real estate loan portfolio is comprised of single-family residential mortgage loans, multi-family residential mortgage loans and nonresidential commercial real estate loans.
Single-Family Residential Mortgage Loans (one to four units)—At December 31, 2000, loans secured by
single-family residential real estate totaled $392.0 million, representing 12.5% of our gross loan and lease portfolio. Approximately 72% of these loans are adjustable-rate mortgages, sometimes referred to as ARMs, and generally have original terms
of 30 years. We discontinued originating single-family loans in 1996 and, as a result, the portfolio of single-family loans has decreased as these loans have paid off and/or been sold. We anticipate that this portfolio will continue to decline as a
percentage of our assets. During 2000, we sold $423.2 million of single-family mortgage loans secured by properties in Northern California. Those sales reduced our concentration of lower-yielding mortgage loans and our geographic concentration
risk.
Multi-Family Residential Mortgage Loans (five or more units)—At December 31, 2000, loans secured by
multi-family residential real estate totaled $611.5 million, representing 19.4% of our gross loan and lease portfolio. The loans that we hold in our portfolio are primarily fully-amortizing ARMs with original terms of 30 years or 15-year ARMs with
monthly payments calculated on a 30-year amortization period with a balloon payment due at maturity. Prior to 1996, we originated ARMs that were indexed to the Federal Home Loan Bank’s Eleventh District Cost of Funds Index, sometimes referred
to as COFI. COFI is considered a lagging index because its interest rate movements generally lag behind changes in market interest rates. Since that time, our originations have been based on indexes other than COFI, such as the London Interbank
Offered Rate, or LIBOR. During 2000, we sold approximately $58.5 million of our multi-family mortgage loans. At December 31, 2000, only 15.4% of our multi-family loans were COFI-indexed loans.
We generally do not lend more than 75% of the appraised value of multi-family residences on a first mortgage loan. The
property’s cash flow available for loan payments is also a limiting factor on the approved loan amount. Properties securing multi-family loans are required to generate cash flow sufficient to cover loan payments and other expected property
expenditures. In addition, most loans provide for full recourse to the borrowers.
Nonresidential Commercial Real Estate Loans—At December 31, 2000, loans secured by nonresidential commercial
real estate totaled $339.8 million, representing 10.8% of our gross loan and lease portfolio. The majority of our commercial real estate loans are ARMs. ARMs secured by commercial real estate are generally made upon the same terms and conditions as
ARMs secured by multi-family residences.
Most of our commercial real estate loans consist of loans secured by improved property such as office buildings,
warehouses, golf courses and retail sales facilities. A majority of these loans are in amounts ranging from $250,000 to $1 million. We generally do not originate commercial real estate loans that have a loan-to-value ratio exceeding 70%. The
property’s cash flow available for loan payments is also a limiting factor on the approved loan amount. Properties securing commercial real estate loans are required to generate cash flow sufficient to cover loan payments and other expected
property expenditures.
Underwriting Policies and Procedures for Real Estate Loans—Multi-family and commercial real estate lending
entails significant additional risks compared to single-family residential mortgage lending. Income producing property loans may involve large loan balances to single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. In addition, repayment of loans secured
by multi-family and commercial real estate properties is typically dependent upon the successful operation of the properties, as well as favorable conditions in the real estate market and/or the economy in general.
We originate multi-family and commercial real estate loans through internal loan production personnel. As part of the
loan underwriting process, staff appraisers or qualified independent appraisers inspect and appraise the property that will secure the loan. A loan underwriter analyzes the merits of the loan based upon information obtained relative to the borrower
and property (e.g., income, credit history, assets, liabilities, cash flows, and the value of the real property as stated on the appraisal report). Loans are then approved at various levels of authority depending upon the amount and type of
loan.
The majority of real estate loans held in our portfolio are secured by properties located in northern California. We
require the American Land Title Association form of title insurance on all loans secured by real property and require that fire and extended coverage casualty insurance in amounts sufficient to rebuild or replace the improvements at current
replacement costs be maintained on all properties securing the loans. In addition, we require flood insurance for properties in flood hazard zones to protect the property securing our interest. Consistent with regional industry practices, we do not
necessarily require earthquake insurance as part of our general underwriting practices. In certain circumstances, however, we may require mudslide, earthquake and/or other hazard insurance depending upon the location of the property.
Consumer Lending
At December 31, 2000, consumer loans totaled $589.9 million, representing 18.7% of our gross loan and lease portfolio.
The consumer loans are comprised primarily of auto loans and home equity loans and lines of credit.
Automobile Financing—At December 31, 2000, auto loans totaled $287.0 million, representing 9.1% of
our gross loan and lease portfolio. Additionally, auto operating leases, excluded from our loan and lease portfolio, totaled $479.8 million at December 31, 2000, representing 9.0% of our consolidated assets. We underwrite and purchase new and used
fixed-rate prime auto loans on an indirect basis. During 1998, we entered into an agreement with Lendco Financial Services for the purchase of auto loans and leases which expired on June 30, 2000. Accordingly, we ceased purchasing auto loans and
leases from Lendco during June 2000. The auto leases are accounted for as operating leases and the leased asset is capitalized and depreciated to its estimated residual value over the term of the lease.
We underwrite all loans and leases that we purchase. Our underwriting standards focus on the borrower’s ability to
repay, as demonstrated by debt-to-income ratios, as well as the borrower’s willingness to repay, as demonstrated by Fair, Isaac & Company Credit Bureau scores, sometimes referred to as FICO scores.
We periodically securitize and/or sell our auto loans. During 2000, we securitized and sold $356.6 million of auto loans
and completed $49.1 million of auto whole loan sales.
Home Equity Lending—At December 31, 2000, home equity loans and lines of credit totaled $302.9
million, representing 9.6% of our gross loan and lease portfolio. Bay View Bank originates conventional home equity loans and lines of credit through its branch network. We have also purchased home equity loans. Through 1998 and the first quarter of
1999, we purchased uninsured high loan-to-value home equity loans. We define high loan-to-value home equity loans as loans with a combined loan-to-value ratio of 100% or more. During 1999, we ceased purchasing these uninsured high loan-to-value home
equity loans and focused our production efforts on originating higher-quality conventional home equity loans and lines of credit (where combined loan-to-value ratios are less than 100%, typically 80% to 90%) or insured high loan-to-value home equity
loans where 100% of the loan is insured against credit losses. During 2000, we sold $244.0 million of our uninsured high loan-to-
value home equity loans. At December 31, 2000, our portfolio included $174.2 million in conventional home equity loans, $100.6 million in high loan-to-value home equity loans, and $28.1 million in 100% insured high loan-to-value home equity
loans.
We underwrite all home equity loans that we originate and purchase. Our underwriting standards for home equity loans
focus on debt-to-income ratios and FICO scores.
Business Loans and Lines of Credit
At December 31, 2000, our business loans totaled $81.4 million, representing 2.6% of our gross loan and lease portfolio.
The business loans are comprised primarily of business lending products (e.g., business term loans and lines of credit), which are offered in conjunction with other services in order to expand Bay View Bank’s customer base and make us more
competitive in the commercial business banking environment.
Commercial Lending
Asset-Based Lending, Factoring and Equipment Leasing—At December 31, 2000, our commercial loans and leases,
excluding franchise loans, totaled $353.4 million, representing 11.2% of our gross loan and lease portfolio. Approximately $248.0 million of the loans and leases outstanding at December 31, 2000 were asset-based loans, including asset-based
participation loans, another $54.6 million of the balance was related to receivable factoring and $50.8 million were equipment leases. Asset-based and factoring loans are primarily adjustable-rate loans based on the prime rate index. Our equipment
leases are fixed-rate direct financing leases. We employ underwriting procedures which include, among other things, continuous reviews of the borrower’s financial condition and periodic audits of the receivables, equipment or other assets
securing the loans and leases. During 2000, we sold $26.5 million of equipment leases.
Franchise Lending—At December 31, 2000, our commercial franchise loans totaled $779.9 million, representing
24.8% of our gross loan and lease portfolio. This total included $336.3 million of franchise loans held-for-sale. We purchased and originated franchise loans until the restructuring of FMAC in September 2000, as previously discussed. In connection
with this restructuring, we intend to reduce our concentration of franchise assets through loan sales. During 2000, we sold $120.0 million of franchise loans. In addition, we completed a $268.2 million on-balance sheet franchise loan securitization
in April 2000, effectively transferring these loans to investment securities. The investment securities resulting from this transaction were subsequently sold during December 2000.
Our franchise loans are primarily fully-amortizing, long-term, fixed- or adjustable-rate loans provided for purposes
other than development and construction of business units. These loans generally have a maximum term and amortization period of up to 20 years. Fixed-rate loans are based upon U.S. Treasury rates plus a spread while adjustable-rate loans are tied to
LIBOR plus a spread and generally reprice on a monthly basis. At December 31, 2000, total franchise loans included $397.3 million of loans to restaurant franchisees and $381.9 million of loans to gas stations and convenience store
operators.
We employ underwriting and monitoring procedures which include, among other things, continuous reviews of the
borrower’s financial condition and periodic audits of the borrower’s business results. We focus on the cash flow of the business, the continuing ability of the borrower to operate the business unit in a cash positive manner and the
borrower’s ability to repay the loan since neither the real property mortgage nor the franchise or license agreement is generally assignable to secure the loan.
Our investing activities primarily involve the purchase and sale of mortgage-backed securities. We purchase securities
to supplement our loan and lease production. Our portfolio includes mortgage-backed securities issued by the Government National Mortgage Association, or GNMA, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac and senior tranches of private issue collateralized mortgage
obligations, or CMO’s which carry less prepayment and credit
risk as compared to other collateralized mortgage obligation tranches. In addition to these securities, we also hold asset-backed securities, retained interests in loan and lease securitizations, U.S. government agency notes and other short-term
securities.
Securities are classified as held-to-maturity or available-for-sale. We do not maintain a trading portfolio. Securities
in the held-to-maturity category consist of securities purchased for long-term investment in order to enhance our ongoing stream of net interest income. Securities deemed held-to-maturity are classified as such because we have both the intent and
ability to hold these securities to maturity. Securities purchased to meet investment-related objectives such as interest rate risk and liquidity management, but which may be sold as necessary to implement management strategies, are designated as
available-for-sale at the time of purchase. We also hold retained interests in our franchise and auto loan securitizations which are designated as securities available-for-sale. At December 31, 2000, we had $642.1 million in securities
held-to-maturity and $33.6 million in securities available-for-sale, including $32.2 million in retained interests. During 2000, we sold $239.9 million of lower-yielding, fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities.
Retail Deposit Activities
Bay View Bank attracts both short-term and long-term deposits from the general public by offering a wide range of
deposit products and services. Bay View Bank, through its branch network, provides its banking customers with money market accounts, savings and checking accounts, certificates of deposit, individual retirement accounts, investment services,
business checking accounts, cash management services, 24-hour automated teller machines, and internet banking and bill-pay services.
Enhancing the value of Bay View Bank’s retail branch franchise remains one of our primary objectives. We plan to
continue to expand our retail banking presence in northern California through internal growth and new product marketing and development. Our retail deposit franchise is currently the largest of any financial institution operating exclusively in the
San Francisco Bay Area.
Our borrowing activities are primarily conducted by Bay View Bank. The Federal Home Loan Bank System functions in a
reserve credit capacity for qualifying financial institutions. As a member, Bay View Bank is required to own capital stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco and may apply for advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
utilizing Federal Home Loan Bank stock, qualifying mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities as collateral.
The Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco offers a full range of borrowing programs on its advances with terms of up
to ten years at competitive market rates. A prepayment penalty is usually imposed for early repayment of these advances. As a Federal Reserve Bank member, Bay View Bank may also borrow from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
We also utilize other short-term borrowing including warehouse lines and Repurchase agreements. Repurchase agreements
are sales of securities we own to securities dealers or the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco with our commitment to repurchase such securities for a predetermined price at a future date. At December 31, 2000 our Federal Home Loan Bank
advances totaled $804.8 million and our short-term borrowings totaled $197.4 million.
At December 31, 2000, we had approximately $239.6 million of debt outstanding. This debt is comprised of (i) $99.6
million of 9.125% Subordinated Notes due August 15, 2007 issued in August 1997 by Bay View Capital Corporation, (ii) $50 million of 10.00% Subordinated Notes due August 31, 2009 issued in August 1999 by Bay View Bank and (iii) $90 million of 9.76%
Capital Securities due December 31, 2028 issued in December 1998 by Bay View Capital I, a Delaware business trust sponsored by Bay View Capital Corporation.
The banking and financial services industry in general, and specifically in California and the San Francisco Bay Area,
is highly competitive. The increasingly competitive environment is a result primarily of changes in regulation, including the 1999 Financial Services Modernization Act, changes in technology and product delivery systems, and the accelerating pace of
consolidation among financial services providers. We compete for loans and leases, deposits, and customers with other commercial banks, savings and loan associations, securities and brokerage companies, mortgage companies, insurance companies,
finance companies, money market funds, credit unions, and other nonbank financial services providers. Many of these competitors are much larger in total assets and capitalization, have greater access to existing and newly emerging capital markets
and offer a broader range of financial services than Bay View Bank. In addition, recent federal legislation may have the effect of further increasing the pace of consolidation within the financial services industry.
In order to compete with other financial services providers, we principally rely upon local promotional activities,
personal relationships with our customers, and specialized services tailored to meet the needs of the communities served. In those instances when we are unable to accommodate a customer’s needs, we may arrange for those services to be provided
by our correspondents. Bay View Bank has branch offices located in the following San Francisco Bay Area counties: San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Marin, Contra Costa, Alameda, Sonoma, Solano, and Santa Cruz. In addition, we operate various
lending facilities through a nationwide network of loan production offices.
Economic Conditions, Government Policies and Legislation
Our profitability, like most financial institutions, is dependent on interest rate differentials. In general, the
difference between the interest rates we pay on our interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and other borrowings, and the interest rates we receive on our interest-earning assets, such as loans, leases and securities, comprises a significant
portion of our earnings. These rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond our control, such as inflation, recession and unemployment and the impact of future changes in domestic and foreign economic conditions that we cannot
predict.
Our business is also influenced by the monetary and fiscal policies of the federal government and the policies of
regulatory agencies, particularly the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, sometimes referred to as the Federal Reserve Board. The Federal Reserve Board implements national monetary policies, with objectives such as curbing inflation
and combating recession, through its open-market operations in U.S. Government securities by adjusting the required level of reserves for depository institutions subject to its reserve requirements, and by varying the target federal funds and
discount rates applicable to borrowings by depository institutions. The actions of the Federal Reserve Board in these areas influence the growth of bank loans, leases, investments, and deposits, and also affect interest rates earned on
interest-earning assets and paid on interest-bearing liabilities. We cannot predict the nature or impact on us of any future changes in monetary and fiscal policies.
From time to time, legislation is enacted, and regulations are adopted which have the effect of increasing the cost of
doing business, limiting or expanding permissible activities, or affecting the competitive balance between financial services providers. Proposals to change the laws and regulations governing the operations and taxation of national banks, bank
holding companies and other financial institutions are frequently made in the U.S. Congress, in the state legislatures and by various regulatory agencies. We cannot predict the likelihood of any legislative or regulatory changes or the impact that
these changes might have on us.
Supervision and Regulation
General
Bay View Capital Corporation and Bay View Bank are extensively regulated under federal law. This regulation is
intended primarily for the protection of depositors and the deposit insurance fund and not for the
benefit of our stockholders. Set forth below is a summary description of the material laws and regulations which relate to our operations. The description is qualified in its entirety by reference to the applicable laws and regulations.
Bay View Capital Corporation
As a registered bank holding company, we are subject to regulation under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as
amended, sometimes referred to as the BHCA. We are required to file with the Federal Reserve Board quarterly, semi-annual and annual reports, and such additional information as the Federal Reserve Board may require pursuant to the BHCA. The Federal
Reserve Board may conduct examinations of Bay View Capital Corporation and our subsidiaries.
The Federal Reserve Board may require that we terminate an activity or terminate control of, or liquidate or divest
certain subsidiaries or affiliates when the Federal Reserve Board believes the activity, or the control of the subsidiary or affiliate constitutes a significant risk to the financial safety, soundness or stability of any of our banking subsidiaries.
The Federal Reserve Board also has the authority to regulate provisions of certain bank holding company debt, including authority to impose interest ceilings and reserve requirements on such debt. Under certain circumstances, we must file written
notice and obtain approval from the Federal Reserve Board prior to purchasing or redeeming our equity securities.
Under the BHCA and regulations adopted by the Federal Reserve Board, we and our nonbanking subsidiaries are prohibited
from requiring certain tie-in arrangements in connection with any extension of credit, lease or sale of property or furnishing of services by Bay View Bank, N.A. Further, we are required by the Federal Reserve Board to maintain certain levels of
regulatory capital.
We are required to obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board for the acquisition of more than 5% of the
outstanding shares of any class of voting securities or substantially all of the assets of any bank or bank holding company. Prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board is also required for the merger or consolidation of Bay View Capital Corporation
with another bank holding company.
We are prohibited by the BHCA, except in certain statutorily prescribed instances, from acquiring direct or indirect
ownership or control of more than 5% of any class of the outstanding voting shares of any company that is not a bank or bank holding company and from engaging directly or indirectly in activities other than those of banking, managing or controlling
banks or furnishing services to our subsidiaries. However, we may, subject to the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board, engage in any, or acquire shares of companies engaged in, activities that were deemed by the Federal Reserve Board to be
so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto prior to November 12, 1999.
Under Federal Reserve Board regulations, a bank holding company is required to serve as a source of financial and
managerial strength to its subsidiary banks and may not conduct its operations in an unsafe or unsound manner. In addition, it is the Federal Reserve Board’s policy that in serving as a source of strength to its subsidiary banks, a bank holding
company should stand ready to use available resources to provide adequate capital funds to its subsidiary banks during periods of financial stress or adversity and should maintain the financial flexibility and capital-raising capacity to obtain
additional resources for assisting its subsidiary banks. A bank holding company’s failure to meet its obligations to serve as a source of strength to its subsidiary banks will generally be considered by the Federal Reserve Board to be an unsafe
and unsound banking practice or a violation of the Federal Reserve Board’s regulations or both.
Our securities are registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. As such, we are subject to the information, proxy solicitation, insider trading, and other requirements and restrictions of the Securities Exchange Act.
Effective April 1, 1999, we changed the listing of our common stock and Capital Securities from Nasdaq to the New York
Stock Exchange and commenced trading of our Subordinated Notes on the New York Stock
Exchange. Our common stock trades under the ticker symbol “BVC”, our capital securities trade under the ticker symbol “BVS”, and our Subordinated Notes trade under the ticker symbol “BVC 07”.
Bay View Bank, N.A.
Bay View Bank, N.A., as a national banking association, is subject to primary supervision, examination and regulation by
the OCC. To a lesser extent, Bay View Bank is also subject to regulations of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, sometimes referred to as the FDIC, which insures our deposit accounts, and the Federal Reserve Board. If, as a result of an
examination, the OCC determines that the financial condition, capital resources, asset quality, earnings prospects, management, liquidity or other aspects of Bay View Bank’s operations are unsatisfactory, or that Bay View Bank or its management
is violating or has violated any law or regulation, various remedies are available to the OCC. Such remedies include the power to enjoin “unsafe or unsound practices”, to require affirmative action to correct any conditions resulting from
any violation or practice, to issue an administrative order that can be judicially enforced, to direct an increase in capital, to restrict the growth of Bay View Bank, to assess civil monetary penalties, and to remove officers and directors. The
FDIC has similar enforcement authority, in addition to its authority to terminate Bay View Bank’s deposit insurance in the absence of action by the OCC and upon a finding that we are in an unsafe or unsound condition, are engaging in unsafe or
unsound activities, or that our conduct poses a risk to the deposit insurance fund or may prejudice the interest of our depositors.
Various requirements and restrictions under the laws of the United States affect the operations of Bay View Bank.
Federal statutes and regulations relate to many aspects of Bay View Bank’s operations, including reserves against deposits, ownership of deposit accounts, interest rates payable on deposits, loans and investments, mergers and acquisitions,
borrowings, dividends, locations of branch offices, capital requirements, and disclosure obligations to depositors and borrowers.
Agreements with Regulatory Agencies
During the third quarter of 2000, we entered into formal agreements with the OCC and the Federal Reserve Bank of San
Francisco (see “Recent Developments” and Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Regulatory Matters”, at Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”).
Dividends and Other Transfers of Funds
Our principal source of income has historically been dividends from Bay View Bank. Bay View Bank is a legal entity
separate and distinct from Bay View Capital Corporation. Bay View Bank is subject to various statutory and regulatory restrictions on its ability to pay dividends to us. In addition, the OCC has the authority to prohibit Bay View Bank from paying
dividends, depending upon its financial condition, if such payment is deemed to constitute an unsafe or unsound practice. As a national bank, Bay View Bank may pay dividends in any one calendar year equal to its net earnings in that calendar year
plus net earnings for the previous two calendar years, less any dividends paid during this three-year period. Under Bay View Bank’s current agreement with the OCC, as previously discussed, dividends may not be declared or distributed to us
without the prior written approval of the OCC.
The OCC also has the authority to prohibit Bay View Bank from engaging in activities that, in the OCC’s
opinion, constitute unsafe or unsound practices in conducting its business. It is possible, depending upon the financial condition of the bank in question and other factors, that the OCC could assert that the payment of dividends or other
payments might, under some circumstances, be such an unsafe or unsound practice. Further, the OCC and the Federal Reserve Board have established guidelines with respect to the maintenance of appropriate levels of capital by national banks and
bank holding companies under their jurisdiction. Compliance with the standards set forth in such guidelines and the restrictions that are or may be imposed under the prompt corrective action provisions of federal law could limit the amount of
dividends that Bay View Bank or Bay View Capital Corporation may pay. An insured depository institution is prohibited from paying management fees to any controlling persons or, with certain limited exceptions, making capital distributions, if after
such transaction
the institution would be undercapitalized. See “Capital Standards” and “Prompt Corrective Regulatory Action and Other Enforcement Mechanisms” for a discussion of these additional restrictions on capital distributions.
Bay View Bank is subject to certain restrictions imposed by federal law on any extensions of credit to, or the issuance
of a guarantee or letter of credit on behalf of, Bay View Capital Corporation or other affiliates, the purchase of, or investments in, stock or other securities thereof, the taking of such securities as collateral for loans, and the purchase of our
assets. Such restrictions prevent us from borrowing from Bay View Bank unless the loans are secured by designated amounts of specified collateral. Further, unless an exception applies, such secured loans and investments are limited for any one
affiliate to 10% of Bay View Bank’s capital and surplus (as defined by federal regulations), and such secured loans and investments are limited for all affiliates in total, to 20% of Bay View Bank’s capital and surplus (as defined by
federal regulations). California law also imposes certain restrictions with respect to transactions involving Bay View Capital Corporation and other controlling persons of Bay View Bank. Additional restrictions on transactions with affiliates may be
imposed on Bay View Bank under the prompt corrective action provisions of federal law. See “Prompt Corrective Action and Other Enforcement Mechanisms.”
The Federal Deposit Insurance Act provides that, in the event of the liquidation or other resolution of an insured
depository institution, the claims of depositors of the institution and certain claims for administrative expenses of the FDIC as receiver will have priority over other general unsecured claims against the institution as well as over nonsecured,
nondeposit creditors, including any depository institution holding company (such as Bay View Capital Corporation), with respect to any extensions of credit they have made to such insured depository institutions.
Capital Standards
The Federal Reserve Board and the OCC have adopted risk-based minimum capital guidelines intended to provide a
measure of capital that reflects the degree of risk associated with a banking organization’s operations for both transactions reported on the balance sheet as assets and transactions, such as letters of credit and recourse arrangements, which
are recorded as off-balance sheet items. Under these guidelines, nominal dollar amounts of assets and credit equivalent amounts of off-balance sheet items are multiplied by one of several risk adjustment percentages, which range from 0% for assets
with low credit risk, such as certain U.S. Treasury securities, to 100% for assets with a higher degree of credit risk, such as commercial loans.
The federal banking agencies require a minimum ratio of qualifying total risk-based capital to risk-adjusted assets of
8% and a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-adjusted assets of 4%. In addition to the risk-based guidelines, federal banking regulators require banking organizations to maintain a minimum amount of Tier 1 capital to total average assets,
referred to as the leverage ratio. For a banking organization rated in the highest of the five categories used by regulators to rate banking organizations, the minimum leverage ratio of Tier 1 capital to total average assets is 3%; otherwise, it is
generally considered to be 4%. In addition to these uniform risk-based capital guidelines and leverage ratios that apply across the industry, the regulators have the discretion to set individual minimum capital requirements for specific institutions
at rates significantly above the minimum guidelines and ratios. (See Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements,
“Stockholders’ Equity and Regulatory Capital Requirements”, at Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for further discussion of our capital ratios).
Prompt Corrective Action and Other Enforcement Mechanisms
Federal banking agencies possess broad powers to take corrective and other supervisory action to resolve the problems of
insured depository institutions, including but not limited to those institutions that fall below one or more prescribed minimum capital ratios. The OCC, which regulates Bay View Bank, has promulgated regulations defining the following five
categories in which an insured depository institution will be placed, based upon its capital ratios: “well-capitalized”, “adequately capitalized”, “undercapitalized”, “significantly undercapitalized”, and
“critically undercapitalized”. At December 31, 2000, Bay View Bank exceeded the ratios required for classification as “adequately capitalized”.
An institution that, based upon its capital levels, is classified as well-capitalized, adequately capitalized or
undercapitalized may be treated as though it were in the next lower capital category if the appropriate federal banking agency, after notice and opportunity for hearing, determines that an unsafe or unsound condition or an unsafe or unsound practice
warrants such treatment. At each successive lower capital category, an insured depository institution is subject to more restrictions. A significantly undercapitalized institution can not be treated as critically undercapitalized unless its capital
ratio actually warrants such treatment.
In addition to measures taken under the prompt corrective action provisions, commercial banking organizations may be
subject to potential enforcement actions by federal regulators for unsafe or unsound practices in conducting their businesses or for violations of any law, rule, regulation, or any condition imposed in writing by the agency or any written agreement
with the agency.
Safety and Soundness Standards
The federal banking agencies have adopted guidelines designed to assist them in identifying and addressing potential
safety and soundness concerns before capital becomes impaired. The guidelines set forth operational and managerial standards relating to: (i) internal controls, information systems and internal audit systems, (ii) loan documentation, (iii) credit
underwriting, (iv) asset growth, (v) earnings, and (vi) compensation, fees and benefits. In addition, the federal banking agencies have also adopted safety and soundness guidelines with respect to asset quality and earnings standards. These
guidelines provide six standards for establishing and maintaining a system to identify problem assets and preventing those assets from deteriorating. Under these standards, an insured depository institution should: (i) conduct periodic asset quality
reviews to identify problem assets, (ii) estimate the inherent losses in problem assets and establish reserves that are sufficient to absorb estimated losses, (iii) compare problem asset totals to capital, (iv) take appropriate corrective action to
resolve problem assets, (v) consider the size and potential risks of material asset concentrations, and (vi) provide periodic asset quality reports with adequate information for management and the Board of Directors to assess the level of asset
risk. These guidelines also set forth standards for evaluating and monitoring earnings and for ensuring that earnings are sufficient to maintain adequate capital and reserves.
Premiums for Deposit Insurance
Bay View Bank’s deposit accounts are insured by the Savings Association Insurance Fund, or SAIF, as administered by
the FDIC, up to the maximum amounts permitted by law. Insurance of deposits may be terminated by the FDIC upon a finding that an institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations or
has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order, or condition imposed by the FDIC or the institution’s primary regulator.
The FDIC charges an annual assessment for the insurance of deposits based on the risk that a particular institution
poses to its deposit insurance fund. The risk classification is based on an institution’s capital group and supervisory subgroup assignment. Pursuant to federal law, on January 1, 1997, Bay View Bank began paying, in addition to its normal
deposit insurance premium as a member of the SAIF, an amount equal to approximately 6.4 basis points per $100 of insured deposits toward the retirement of the Financing Corporation bonds issued in the 1980s to assist in the recovery of the savings
and loan industry. Members of the Bank Insurance Fund, or BIF, by contrast, pay, in addition to their normal deposit insurance premium, approximately 1.3 basis points. Under federal law, the FDIC is not permitted to establish SAIF assessment rates
that are lower than comparable BIF assessment rates. On January 1, 2000, the rate paid to retire the Financing Corporation bonds became equal for members of the BIF and the SAIF at 2.12 basis points. Effective January 1, 2001, our total deposit
insurance premium increased from 2.12 basis points to 18.96 basis points per $100 of insured deposits due to Bay View Bank’s regulatory capital classification as “adequately capitalized” (See Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements, “Stockholders’ Equity and Regulatory Capital Requirements,” at Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”).
Interstate Banking and Branching
The BHCA permits bank holding companies from any state to acquire banks and bank holding companies located in any other
state, subject to certain conditions, including certain nationwide- and state-imposed concentration limits. Bay View Bank has the ability, subject to certain restrictions, to acquire by acquisition or merger branches outside its home state. The
establishment of new interstate branches is also possible in those states with laws that expressly permit it. Interstate branches are subject to certain laws of the states in which they are located. Competition may increase further as banks branch
across state lines and enter new markets.
Community Reinvestment Act and Fair Lending Developments
Bay View Bank is subject to certain fair lending requirements and reporting obligations involving home mortgage lending
operations and Community Reinvestment Act, or CRA, activities. The CRA generally requires the federal banking agencies to evaluate the record of a financial institution in meeting the credit needs of its local communities, including low- and
moderate-income neighborhoods. A bank may be subject to substantial penalties and corrective measures for a violation of certain fair lending laws. The federal banking agencies may take compliance with such laws and CRA obligations into account when
regulating and supervising other activities.
A bank’s compliance with its CRA obligations is based upon a performance-based evaluation system which bases CRA
ratings on an institution’s lending service and investment performance. When a bank holding company applies for approval to acquire a bank or other bank holding company, the Federal Reserve Board will review the assessment of each subsidiary
bank of the applicant bank holding company, and such records may be the basis for denying the application. Based on an examination conducted April 3, 2000, Bay View Bank was rated “satisfactory” in complying with its CRA
obligations.
At December 31, 2000, we had a total of 1,018 employees on a full-time equivalent basis, consisting of both full-time
and permanent part-time employees, as follows:
| Bay View Bank, N.A. and Subsidiaries |
|
855 |
| Bay View Capital Corporation |
|
163 |
| |
|
|
| Total |
|
1,018 |
| |
|
|
Our employees are not represented by any unions or covered by any collective bargaining agreements. We consider our
relations with our employees to be satisfactory.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the executive officers of the Registrant.
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Year
Appointed
|
| Edward H. Sondker |
|
53 |
|
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
1995 |
|
| |
| Matthew L. Carpenter |
|
41 |
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating
Officer, Bay View Capital Corporation and
President and Chief Executive Officer, Bay View
Commercial Finance Group |
|
2001 |
|
| |
| Richard E. Arnold |
|
60 |
|
Executive Vice President and Director of Sales and
Banking Administration, Bay View Bank |
|
1997 |
|
| |
| James A. Badame |
|
57 |
|
President, Bay View Acceptance Corporation |
|
1998 |
|
| |
| John N. Buckley |
|
43 |
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer |
|
1995 |
|
| |
| Mark E. Lefanowicz |
|
44 |
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer |
|
2000 |
|
| |
| Ronald L. Reed |
|
54 |
|
Executive Vice President and Director of
Management Information Systems and Loan
Servicing |
|
1997 |
|
| |
| Douglas J. Wallis |
|
50 |
|
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and
Corporate Secretary |
|
2000 |
|
| |
| Carolyn Williams-Goldman |
|
39 |
|
Executive Vice President and Director of
Administration |
|
1998 |
The business experience of each of our executive officers is as follows:
Mr. Sondker has served as a Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of Bay View Capital Corporation since 1995.
Previously, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Independence One Bank of California, FSB, a subsidiary of Michigan National Corporation. From 1985 to 1990, he was the President and Chief Executive Officer of La Jolla Bank &
Trust Company. Prior to 1985, Mr. Sondker held executive and management positions with a community bank holding company in Kansas City, Missouri. On February 14, 2001, Mr. Sondker announced his retirement from the banking industry and from his
positions as president, CEO and director. A nationwide search for his replacement is underway. During this transition, Mr. Sondker will continue in his current capacity until a successor is named.
Mr. Carpenter was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Bay View Capital Corporation in 2001
and has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of our subsidiary Bay View Commercial Finance Group since 1999. Prior to being appointed President and Chief Executive Officer, he served as Chief Operating Officer of Bay View Commercial
Finance Group from the time of its acquisition by Bay View Capital Corporation in 1997. Prior to the acquisition, Mr. Carpenter served as Chief Financial Officer of Concord Growth Corporation, the predecessor of Bay View Commercial Finance Group,
from 1991 to 1997, and as President of EXXE Data Corporation, the holding company of Concord Growth Corporation, from 1993 to 1997.
Mr. Arnold, Executive Vice President, has served as Director of Sales and Banking Administration since 1997. Previously,
he served as Executive Vice President of First Interstate Bank and was responsible for all branch banking activities in northern California. Prior to joining First Interstate Bank in 1990, he held executive and management positions at Security
Pacific Bank in a career that spanned over 30 years.
Mr. Badame has served as President of Bay View Acceptance Corporation since 1998. Prior to joining the Company, he
served as Director of Operations for Triad Financial Corporation, a non-prime indirect automobile
loan originator. He has over 25 years of experience in the indirect retail and wholesale automobile dealer financing business in a commercial bank environment, including management and executive positions with Bank of America, Marine Midland Banks
and Imperial Thrift. Mr. Badame has also held sales, business and general management positions with General Motors, Chrysler and Honda franchisees in the retail automobile industry.
Mr. Buckley, Executive Vice President, has served as Chief Credit Officer since 1995 and Manager of Credit
Administration and Asset Management since 1994. He joined Bay View Capital Corporation in September 1993. Previously, he served at Bank of America in various capacities from 1985 to 1993. His last position was Vice President and Regional Credit
Administrator for the Real Estate Industries Division at Bank of America.
Mr. Lefanowicz, Executive Vice President, has served as Chief Financial Officer of Bay View Capital Corporation since
July 2000. Previously he served as the Chief Financial Officer for Provident, the nation’s largest privately held mortgage bank. Prior to joining Provident, Mr. Lefanowicz held various positions as a partner at Coopers & Lybrand, LLP. Mr
Lefanowicz has over 22 years of experience in financial service management and consulting and he is a Certified Public Accountant.
Mr. Reed, Executive Vice President, has served as Director of Management Information Systems and Loan Servicing since
1997. Previously, he served as Chief Information Officer for Weyerhaeuser and WMC Mortgage Corporation. He has over 30 years of corporate management, information technology and servicing experience and has also held senior management positions with
Technology Management Corporation, American Savings Bank and Home Savings of America/HF Ahmanson.
Mr. Wallis, Executive Vice President, was appointed General Counsel of Bay View Capital Corporation in January 2000. Mr.
Wallis joined Bay View Capital Corporation in 1999 as General Counsel for Bay View Bank. Previously, he served as Executive Vice President and General Counsel for California Federal Bank. Mr. Wallis is a member of the State Bars of California and
Missouri. He has over 25 years of experience within the banking industry.
Ms. Williams-Goldman, Executive Vice President, has served as Director of Administration since 1998 and Director of
Human Resources since 1995. She joined Bay View Capital Corporation as Associate Counsel in 1994. Previously, she served as Vice President and Counsel at First Nationwide Bank in San Francisco. Prior to her service with First Nationwide Bank, she
was an Associate in the Business Law and Banking Practice Groups of Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts. She is a member of the State Bars of California and New York.
There is no family relationship among the above officers. All executive officers serve at the discretion of the Board of
Directors.
At December 31, 2000, we occupied a total of 100 offices plus our administrative corporate office under operating lease
agreements expiring at various dates through the year 2016. In most instances, these lease arrangements include options to renew or extend the lease at market rates. Bay View Bank owns the property on which four of its branches are located. We also
own leasehold improvements, furniture and equipment at our offices and branches, all of which are used in our business activities.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
There were no legal proceedings requiring disclosure pursuant to this item at December 31, 2000, or at the date of this
report.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise, during
the three months ended December 31, 2000.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
At December 31, 2000, our common stock was traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the stock symbol “BVC.”
At December 31, 2000, 32,574,987 shares of our common stock were outstanding, which were owned by 1,515 stockholders of record.
The following table illustrates quarterly closing stock price activity and dividends declared for 2000 and
1999:
| |
|
2000
|
| |
|
First
Quarter
|
|
Second
Quarter
|
|
Third
Quarter
|
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
| Stock price—high |
|
$13.44 |
|
$11.25 |
|
$10.75 |
|
$10.00 |
| Stock price—low |
|
$ 7.19 |
|
$ 6.56 |
|
$ 8.50 |
|
$ 4.94 |
| Dividends |
|
$ 0.10 |
|
$ 0.10 |
|
$ 0.10 |
|
$ — |
|
| |
| |
|
1999
|
| |
|
First
Quarter
|
|
Second
Quarter
|
|
Third
Quarter
|
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
| Stock price—high |
|
$21.06 |
|
$20.50 |
|
$20.56 |
|
$16.81 |
| Stock price—low |
|
$17.44 |
|
$16.25 |
|
$12.50 |
|
$11.69 |
| Dividends |
|
$ 0.10 |
|
$ 0.10 |
|
$ 0.10 |
|
$ — |
Our ability to pay dividends is subject to certain restrictions and limitations pursuant to applicable laws and
regulations. During the third quarter of 2000 we entered into an agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank that, among other matters, requires prior approval of any dividend payments on our common stock. Our primary source of income is dividends from
Bay View Bank. Bay View Bank is prohibited from paying dividends to us without prior approval of the OCC under its agreement with the OCC (see “Recent Developments” at Item 1. “Business” and Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements, “Stockholders’ Equity and Regulatory Capital Requirements,” at Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”).
Item 6. Selected Financial Data—Five-Year Financial Information
| |
|
At December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
|
1997
|
|
1996
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Selected Balance Sheet Information(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total assets |
|
$5,360,931 |
|
|
$6,498,700 |
|
|
$5,596,232 |
|
|
$3,246,476 |
|
|
$3,300,262 |
|
| Mortgage-backed securities |
|
642,628 |
|
|
654,713 |
|
|
635,389 |
|
|
470,261 |
|
|
577,613 |
|
| Loans and leases held-for-investment, net |
|
2,751,794 |
|
|
4,295,246 |
|
|
4,191,269 |
|
|
2,373,113 |
|
|
2,179,768 |
|
| Loans and leases held-for-sale |
|
345,207 |
|
|
66,247 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
294,949 |
|
| Investment in operating leased assets, net |
|
479,829 |
|
|
463,088 |
|
|
183,453 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
| Deposits |
|
3,746,312 |
|
|
3,729,780 |
|
|
3,269,637 |
|
|
1,677,135 |
|
|
1,763,967 |
|
| Borrowings |
|
1,153,443 |
|
|
1,935,517 |
|
|
1,833,116 |
|
|
1,355,976 |
|
|
1,245,537 |
|
| Intangible assets |
|
134,936 |
|
|
329,005 |
|
|
134,088 |
|
|
29,507 |
|
|
10,197 |
|
| Capital Securities |
|
90,000 |
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
| Stockholders’ equity |
|
297,849 |
|
|
631,194 |
|
|
377,811 |
|
|
173,627 |
|
|
200,062 |
|
|
| |
| |
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
|
1997
|
|
1996
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) |
Selected Results of Operations
Information(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Interest income |
|
$ 460,192 |
|
|
$ 421,656 |
|
|
$ 406,363 |
|
|
$ 242,244 |
|
|
$ 241,755 |
|
| Interest expense |
|
(294,752 |
) |
|
(251,172 |
) |
|
(251,762 |
) |
|
(154,908 |
) |
|
(160,773 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net interest income |
|
165,440 |
|
|
170,484 |
|
|
154,601 |
|
|
87,336 |
|
|
80,982 |
|
| Provision for losses on loans and leases |
|
(62,600 |
) |
|
(28,311 |
) |
|
(9,114 |
) |
|
(1,952 |
) |
|
(1,898 |
) |
| Leasing income |
|
97,207 |
|
|
58,558 |
|
|
11,341 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Gain (loss) on sales of assets and
liabilities |
|
(52,606 |
) |
|
10,058 |
|
|
1,060 |
|
|
925 |
|
|
(1,453 |
) |
| Other income, net |
|
32,041 |
|
|
22,916 |
|
|
18,671 |
|
|
11,830 |
|
|
10,017 |
|
| General and administrative expenses |
|
(136,718 |
) |
|
(112,598 |
) |
|
(113,567 |
) |
|
(71,913 |
) |
|
(58,955 |
) |
General and administrative expenses—
FMAC loan production |
|
(15,561 |
) |
|
(2,395 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
General and administrative expenses—
Bankers Mutual |
|
(6,311 |
) |
|
(2,123 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
| Restructuring charges—FMAC |
|
(9,213 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
| Revaluation of FMAC-related assets |
|
(101,894 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
| Leasing expense |
|
(69,350 |
) |
|
(40,188 |
) |
|
(7,682 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
| Dividend expense on Capital Securities |
|
(8,989 |
) |
|
(8,935 |
) |
|
(244 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
| SAIF recapitalization assessment |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(11,750 |
) |
| Real estate operations, net |
|
(65 |
) |
|
238 |
|
|
240 |
|
|
1,128 |
|
|
4,909 |
|
| Amortization of intangible assets |
|
(11,158 |
) |
|
(11,993 |
) |
|
(11,372 |
) |
|
(4,088 |
) |
|
(2,606 |
) |
Amortization of intangible assets—
FMAC |
|
(9,608 |
) |
|
(1,694 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
| Write-off of intangible assets—FMAC |
|
(192,622 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax (expense)
benefit |
|
(382,007 |
) |
|
54,017 |
|
|
43,934 |
|
|
23,266 |
|
|
19,246 |
|
| Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
55,810 |
|
|
(25,053 |
) |
|
(21,215 |
) |
|
(9,245 |
) |
|
(8,277 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net income (loss) |
|
$ (326,197 |
) |
|
$ 28,964 |
|
|
$ 22,719 |
|
|
$ 14,021 |
|
|
$ 10,969 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Earnings (loss) per diluted share |
|
$ (10.00 |
) |
|
$ 1.36 |
|
|
$ 1.12 |
|
|
$ 1.06 |
|
|
$ 0.79 |
|
| Dividends declared per share |
|
$ 0.30 |
|
|
$ 0.30 |
|
|
$ 0.40 |
|
|
$ 0.34 |
|
|
$ 0.31 |
|
| |
|
At and For the Year Ended December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
|
1997
|
|
1996
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) |
| Selected Other Information(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net interest margin |
|
3.13 |
% |
|
3.23 |
% |
|
3.03 |
% |
|
2.86 |
% |
|
2.57 |
% |
| Return on average assets |
|
(5.20 |
)% |
|
0.49 |
% |
|
0.41 |
% |
|
0.45 |
% |
|
0.34 |
% |
| Return on average equity |
|
(58.80 |
)% |
|
7.00 |
% |
|
5.87 |
% |
|
7.32 |
% |
|
5.39 |
% |
| Ratio of total equity to total assets |
|
5.56 |
% |
|
9.71 |
% |
|
6.75 |
% |
|
5.35 |
% |
|
6.06 |
% |
| Book value per share |
|
$ 9.14 |
|
|
$ 19.38 |
|
|
$ 19.77 |
|
|
$ 14.38 |
|
|
$ 14.98 |
|
| Dividend payout ratio |
|
N/A |
|
|
19.26 |
% |
|
35.57 |
% |
|
30.53 |
% |
|
38.61 |
% |
| Nonperforming assets |
|
$101,713 |
|
|
$25,939 |
|
|
$18,020 |
|
|
$15,766 |
|
|
$24,310 |
|
| Ratio of nonperforming assets to total assets |
|
1.90 |
% |
|
0.40 |
% |
|
0.32 |
% |
|
0.49 |
% |
|
0.74 |
% |
(1)
|
Includes the acquisitions of Bay View Credit effective June 1, 1996, Bay View Commercial Finance Group effective April 1,
1997, Ultra Funding effective October 1, 1997, America First Eureka Holdings effective January 2, 1998, and Franchise Mortgage Acceptance Company effective November 1, 1999.
|
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
INDEX
| Strategic Overview |
|
22 |
| Our Mission and Strategy |
|
22 |
| Retail Platform Strategy |
|
22 |
| Commercial Platform Strategy |
|
23 |
| Results of Operations |
|
23 |
| Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin |
|
24 |
| Interest Income |
|
28 |
| Interest Expense |
|
30 |
| Provision for Losses on Loans and Leases |
|
32 |
| Noninterest Income (Loss) |
|
32 |
| Noninterest Expense |
|
33 |
| Income Taxes |
|
37 |
| Non-GAAP Performance Measures |
|
37 |
| Normalized Net Interest Margin |
|
37 |
| Balance Sheet Analysis |
|
39 |
| Securities |
|
39 |
| Loans and Leases |
|
42 |
| Deposits |
|
48 |
| Borrowings |
|
49 |
| Liquidity |
|
51 |
| Capital Resources |
|
52 |
| Stock Repurchase Program |
|
54 |
| Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices |
|
54 |
Strategic Overview
Bay View Capital Corporation is a diversified financial services company headquartered in San Mateo, California. Our
principal subsidiary is Bay View Bank, N.A. We operate two distinct business platforms representing the two basic distribution channels of our primary businesses, retail and commercial banking.
Our Retail Platform includes single-family real estate loans, home equity loans and lines of credit, auto loans and
leases, mortgage-backed securities and other investments, and other consumer banking products and services. The platform’s results include the income and expenses related to these business activities.
Our Commercial Platform includes multi-family and commercial real estate loans, franchise loans, asset-based loans,
factoring loans, commercial leases, and other business banking products and services. The platform’s results include the income and expenses related to these business activities.
Our Mission and Strategy
Our mission has been to create a diversified financial services company by investing in and developing niche businesses
with risk-adjusted returns that enhance shareholder value. From 1996 to 1999, our strategy was to transform Bay View Bank from a traditional thrift to a commercial bank. During this period we nearly doubled in size, replaced a majority of our
mortgage-based loans with higher-yielding consumer and commercial loans and leases and transformed a significant portion of our deposits into lower-cost transaction accounts. Our strategy has now refocused around the development of our core
commercial banking activities and the growth of our deposit franchise. In order to realize these objectives, our focus remains on the following:
|
·
|
Enhancing and expanding Bay View Bank’s deposit base by attracting and retaining lower-cost transaction accounts,
including commercial and business checking accounts, through increased marketing and promotional efforts and offering competitively priced certificates of deposit.
|
|
·
|
Originating and purchasing consumer and commercial loans and leases with higher yields, shorter maturities, less geographic
concentration risk, and less interest rate sensitivity.
|
|
·
|
Reducing our franchise loan risk concentration by selling our franchise loans classified as held-for-sale at December 31,
2000.
|
|
·
|
Managing the capital levels of both Bay View Bank and Bay View Capital Corporation with the goal of attaining and maintaining
capital levels at or above the well-capitalized level, as defined for regulatory purposes.
|
During 2000, we retained the services of Merrill Lynch & Co. as our financial advisor.
Retail Platform Strategy
One of the principal businesses of the Retail Platform is Bay View Bank’s 57 full service branch banking network. A
primary objective of the Retail Platform is to enhance the value of our deposit franchise by focusing on deposit growth and expanding and enhancing products and services. A primary component of the Retail Platform’s deposit growth strategy has
been to focus on lower-cost transaction accounts (e.g., checking, savings and money market accounts) as a source of financing. We also offer a full array of consumer banking products and services. We continued to make progress on our goal of
expanding our deposit base by growing business deposits and introducing internet banking to our customers. Consumer internet banking was launched at the end of the first quarter of 2000 while business online banking was launched in June 2000. Our
retail deposits grew $140.8 million during 2000, reflecting the continued strength of our deposit franchise.
The Retail Platform includes our single-family loan portfolio. We discontinued originating single-family loans in 1996
to reduce our concentration risk and facilitate the change-out of our balance sheet from mortgage-
based assets to higher-yielding commercial bank-like assets. As a result, the portfolio of single-family loans is decreasing over time as these loans are repaid or sold.
The Retail Platform’s home equity loan portfolio includes conventional home equity loans and lines of credit and
certain high loan-to-value home equity loans. We define conventional home equity loans and lines of credit as having combined loan-to-value ratios of less than or equal to 100%. We define high loan-to-value home equity loans as having combined
loan-to-value ratios of greater than 100%. Our home equity loan production efforts are focused on conventional home equity loans and lines of credit originated through our branch banking network. Our high loan-to value home equity loans were
purchased primarily in 1997 and 1998, a significant portion of which were sold during 2000.
The Retail Platform also originates and purchases fixed-rate loans and leases secured by new and used autos. In
executing our strategy, we identify product niches which are not the primary focus of traditional competitors in the auto lending area, such as banks and captive finance companies. One such niche includes auto loans where a highly qualified borrower
desires a higher relative loan amount and/or a longer term than is offered by many other more traditional auto financing sources. In return for the flexibility of the products offered, we charge higher interest rates while still applying traditional
underwriting criteria to mitigate any potential loan losses.
During 1998, we entered into an agreement with Lendco Financial Services for the purchase of auto loans and leases which
expired on June 30, 2000. Accordingly, we ceased purchasing auto loans and leases from Lendco in June 2000.
Commercial Platform Strategy
The Commercial Platform’s objective is to increase our earnings potential and enhance our deposit franchise by
providing commercial bank-like products and services to small and middle-market businesses on a nationwide basis. The Commercial Platform’s strategy centers on originating and purchasing commercial loans and leases with higher risk-adjusted
returns.
The Commercial Platform originates loans and leases including multi-family and commercial real estate loans, asset-based
loans, factoring loans, and equipment leases. The Platform also includes franchise loans that were purchased or originated by the FMAC lending division. FMAC’s lending operations were shut down in September 2000 (See Note 3 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements, “Restructuring Charges” at Item 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for further details of our FMAC restructuring). We intend to decrease our current concentration of franchise loans by selling
our franchise loans classified as held-for-sale that totaled $336.3 million as of December 31, 2000.
Results of Operations
Our consolidated net loss was $326.2 million, or $10.00 per diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2000 as
compared with net income of $29.0 million, or $1.36 per diluted share, for 1999 and $22.7 million, or $1.12 per diluted share, for 1998.
The net loss in 2000 was primarily the result of the restructuring of our franchise lending division, and the
revaluation of franchise-related assets. Restructuring charges totaled $9.2 million before taxes and consisted primarily of severance, occupancy and related facility costs. Goodwill of $192.6 million was written off, representing the unamortized
balance associated with the purchase of FMAC. The revaluation of certain FMAC-related assets resulted in a $101.9 million pre-tax adjustment. The revaluation included a $35.4 million adjustment to residual and servicing assets related to the
franchise loan securitizations and other FMAC-related assets. The revaluation also included a $66.5 million mark-to-market charge on our $336.3 million portfolio of franchise loans held-for-sale, reflecting estimated bulk-sale pricing. Additionally,
we recorded $52.6 million in pre-tax net losses associated with asset sales and $43.5 million of loan loss provision related to franchise loans during 2000.
The increases in net income and earnings per diluted share in 1999 as compared with 1998, were primarily driven by the
expansion of our net interest margin and higher net interest income associated with the change-out of our balance sheet to higher-yielding commercial assets and lower-cost funding.
Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin
Net interest income represents the difference between interest earned on loans, leases and investments and interest paid
on funding sources, including deposits and borrowings, and has historically been our principal source of revenue. Net interest margin is the amount of net interest income expressed as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.
Average Balance Sheet
The following table illustrates average yields on our interest-earning assets and average rates on our interest-bearing
liabilities for the years indicated. These average yields and rates are derived by dividing interest income by the average balances of interest-earning assets and by dividing interest expense by the average balances of interest-bearing liabilities
for the years indicated. Average balances of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities were calculated by averaging the relevant month-end amounts for the respective years.
AVERAGE BALANCES, YIELDS AND RATES
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
| |
|
Average
Balance
|
|
Interest
|
|
Average
Yield/Rate
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
Interest
|
|
Average
Yield/Rate
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
Interest
|
|
Average
Yield/Rate
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
| |
| ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Loans and leases |
|
$3,949,017 |
|
|
$360,203 |
|
9.12 |
% |
|
$4,444,079 |
|
|
$369,841 |
|
8.32 |
% |
|
$4,174,976 |
|
$347,086 |
|
8.32 |
% |
Mortgage-backed
securities(1) |
|
856,004 |
|
|
60,923 |
|
7.12 |
|
|
583,286 |
|
|
37,376 |
|
6.41 |
|
|
743,545 |
|
48,225 |
|
6.50 |
|
| Investments(1) |
|
481,519 |
|
|
39,066 |
|
8.11 |
|
|
244,146 |
|
|
14,439 |
|
5.91 |
|
|
179,492 |
|
11,052 |
|
6.17 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning
assets |
|
5,286,540 |
|
|
460,192 |
|
8.71 |
|
|
5,271,511 |
|
|
421,656 |
|
8.00 |
|
|
5,098,013 |
|
406,363 |
|
7.98 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Other assets(2) |
|
981,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
611,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
394,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total assets |
|
$6,268,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$5,882,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$5,492,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
LIABILITIES
AND
STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Interest-bearing
liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Deposits |
|
$3,751,034 |
|
|
176,602 |
|
4.71 |
|
|
$3,462,048 |
|
|
142,427 |
|
4.11 |
|
|
$3,375,777 |
|
149,656 |
|
4.44 |
|
| Borrowings(3) |
|
1,783,514 |
|
|
118,150 |
|
6.62 |
|
|
1,882,278 |
|
|
108,745 |
|
5.78 |
|
|
1,663,972 |
|
102,106 |
|
6.15 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing
liabilities |
|
5,534,548 |
|
|
294,752 |
|
5.33 |
|
|
5,344,326 |
|
|
251,172 |
|
4.70 |
|
|
5,039,749 |
|
251,762 |
|
5.00 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Other liabilities |
|
179,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total liabilities |
|
5,713,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,468,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,105,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Stockholders’ equity |
|
554,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
413,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
386,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders’ equity |
|
$6,268,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$5,882,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$5,492,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income/net
interest spread |
|
|
|
|
$165,440 |
|
3.38 |
% |
|
|
|
|
$170,484 |
|
3.30 |
% |
|
|
|
$154,601 |
|
2.98 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest-earning
assets (liabilities) |
|
$ (248,008 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ (72,815 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 58,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net interest margin(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.23 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
3.03 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Average balances and yields for securities and other investments classified as available-for-sale are based on historical
amortized cost.
|
(2)
|
Other assets include average auto lease balances of $513.3 million, $332.0 million, and $65.8 million for the years ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.
|
(3)
|
Interest expense on borrowings includes interest expense (income) and premiums on interest rate swaps and caps of ($0.2)
million, $3.1 million and $2.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. Interest expense on borrowings excludes dividend expense on our Capital Securities.
|
(4)
|
Net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.
|
Net interest income was $165.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2000 as compared with $170.5 million for 1999 and
$154.6 million for 1998. Net interest margin was 3.13% for the year ended December 31, 2000 as compared with 3.23% for 1999 and 3.03% for 1998.
The following table illustrates net interest income and net interest margin, by platform, for the years indicated:
(Also see Note 24 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Segment and Related Information,” at Item 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for further discussion on our business platforms).
| |
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
| |
|
Net
Interest
Income
|
|
Net
Interest
Margin
|
|
Net
Interest
Income
|
|
Net
Interest
Margin
|
|
Net
Interest
Income
|
|
Net
Interest
Margin
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Retail Platform(1) |
|
$ 62,120 |
|
2.27 |
% |
|
$ 96,478 |
|
2.78 |
% |
|
$101,246 |
|
2.78 |
% |
| Commercial Platform |
|
103,320 |
|
4.04 |
|
|
74,006 |
|
4.11 |
|
|
53,355 |
|
3.66 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
$165,440 |
|
3.13 |
% |
|
$170,484 |
|
3.23 |
% |
|
$154,601 |
|
3.03 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The Retail Platform’s net interest margin and net interest income presented above excludes the revenue impact of our
auto leasing activities, which is included in noninterest income, but does include the associated funding costs.
|
The decrease in net interest income for 2000, as compared with 1999, was due to a decrease in net interest margin offset
by a slight increase in average interest-earning assets. Our net interest margin decreased due to the increasing impact of higher funding costs and the increase in net interest-bearing liabilities associated with funding our auto leasing activities,
as discussed further below. Average interest-earning assets increased primarily due to higher mortgage-backed securities and other investment securities balances offset by a decline in loan balances resulting from the sales and/or securitizations
effected during 2000. Our net interest spreads increased due to higher yields on interest-earning assets, resulting from the change-out of our balance sheet to more commercial bank-like assets and the higher interest rate environment partially
offset by higher funding costs. The increases in net interest income and net interest margin in 1999, as compared with 1998, were attributable to our development into a commercial bank and the related shift from traditional mortgage-based assets to
consumer and commercial assets with higher risk-adjusted yields, combined with a decline in our funding costs. Our funding costs declined due to an increase in lower-cost transaction accounts, deposit pricing strategies, a decline in the interest
rate environment during the first half of 1999 and the managed run-off of our higher-cost certificates of deposit.
Our net interest margin, calculated in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America, sometimes referred to as GAAP, excludes the revenue impact of our auto leasing activities, but includes the associated funding costs. Because auto leases are accounted for as operating leases, the rental income and related expenses,
including depreciation expense, are reflected in noninterest income and noninterest expense in accordance with GAAP. (For a discussion of normalized net interest income and net interest margin, including the revenue impact of our auto leasing
activities, see “Non-GAAP Performance Measures—Normalized Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin”).
Net interest income and net interest margin by platform reflect the shift in our asset mix toward more commercial
bank-like products. This shift in our asset mix to higher-yielding assets helped to mitigate the impact of higher funding costs during 2000 due to the rising interest rate environment and increased reliance on higher-cost wholesale borrowings. (See
the following discussions of “Interest Income” and “Interest Expense”).
The following tables illustrate average interest-earning assets, excluding our auto-related operating lease assets, by
platform, for the years ended as indicated:
| |
|
Average Balances for the Year Ended
December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Retail Platform(1) |
|
$2,732,093 |
|
$3,472,291 |
|
$3,640,743 |
| Commercial Platform |
|
2,554,447 |
|
1,799,220 |
|
1,457,270 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
$5,286,540 |
|
$5,271,511 |
|
$5,098,013 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Amounts exclude auto-related operating leased assets. The average balance of these assets was $513.3 million for the year
ended December 31, 2000, $332.0 million for the year ended December 31, 1999 and $65.8 million for the year ended December 31, 1998.
|
The decreases in the Retail Platform’s average interest-earning assets and the corresponding increases in the
Commercial Platform’s average interest-earning assets, as compared with the prior periods, reflect our continued shift in asset mix toward more commercial bank-like products. The Retail Platform’s average interest-earning assets were also
impacted from 1998 through 2000 by loan sales and/or securitizations throughout these periods, as discussed elsewhere herein.
The following table illustrates interest-earning assets, excluding our auto-related operating lease assets, by platform,
as of the dates indicated:
| |
|
At December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Retail Platform(1) |
|
$1,727,537 |
|
$3,195,647 |
| Commercial Platform |
|
2,178,619 |
|
2,219,536 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
$3,906,156 |
|
$5,415,183 |
| |
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Amounts exclude auto-related operating leased assets. These assets totaled $479.8 million at December 31, 2000 and $463.1
million at December 31, 1999.
|
The significant decrease in the Retail Platform’s interest-earning assets, excluding our auto-related operating
lease assets, at December 31, 2000, as compared with December 31, 1999, was due primarily to sales of $423.2 million of single-family mortgage loans and $244.0 million of HLTV home equity loans, and the securitization and sales of $405.7 million of
auto loans during 2000.
Interest Income
Interest income was $460.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2000 as compared with $421.7 million for 1999 and
$406.4 million for 1998. The average yield on interest-earning assets was 8.71% for the year ended December 31, 2000 as compared with 8.00% for 1999 and 7.98% for 1998. The increase in interest income and average yields in 2000, as compared to 1999,
was primarily a result of the change-out of our balance sheet to more commercial bank-like assets and the higher interest rate environment. The increase in interest income and average yields in 1999, as compared to 1998, was attributable to our
development into a commercial bank and the related shift from traditional mortgage-based assets to consumer and commercial assets with higher risk-adjusted yields, combined with an increase in average interest-earning assets. The following tables
illustrate interest income, by platform, for the periods indicated:
| |
|
For the Year Ended
December 31, 2000
|
| |
|
Average
Balance
|
|
Interest
Income
|
|
Average
Yield
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Retail Platform: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Loans |
|
$1,587,130 |
|
$138,792 |
|
8.74 |
% |
| Mortgage-backed securities |
|
856,004 |
|
60,923 |
|
7.12 |
|
| Investments |
|
288,959 |
|
21,736 |
|
7.52 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total Retail
Platform |
|
2,732,093 |
|
221,451 |
|
8.11 |
|
| Commercial Platform: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Loans and leases |
|
2,361,887 |
|
221,411 |
|
9.37 |
|
| Investments |
|
192,560 |
|
17,330 |
|
9.00 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total Commercial
Platform |
|
2,554,447 |
|
238,741 |
|
9.35 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
$5,286,540 |
|
$460,192 |
|
8.71 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
For the Year Ended
December 31, 1999
|
| |
|
Average
Balance
|
|
Interest
Income
|
|
Average
Yield
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Retail Platform: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Loans |
|
$2,653,496 |
|
$216,023 |
|
8.14 |
% |
| Mortgage-backed securities |
|
583,286 |
|
37,376 |
|
6.41 |
|
| Investments |
|
235,509 |
|
12,608 |
|
5.35 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total Retail
Platform |
|
3,472,291 |
|
266,007 |
|
7.66 |
|
| Commercial Platform: |
| Loans and leases |
|
1,790,583 |
|
153,819 |
|
8.59 |
|
| Investments |
|
8,637 |
|
1,830 |
|
21.19 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total Commercial
Platform |
|
1,799,220 |
|
155,649 |
|
8.65 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
$5,271,511 |
|
$421,656 |
|
8.00 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
For the Year Ended
December 31, 1998
|
| |
|
Average
Balance
|
|
Interest
Income
|
|
Average
Yield
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Retail Platform: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Loans |
|
$2,717,706 |
|
$221,694 |
|
8.17 |
% |
| Mortgage-backed securities |
|
743,545 |
|
48,225 |
|
6.50 |
|
| Investments |
|
179,492 |
|
11,052 |
|
6.17 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total Retail
Platform |
|
3,640,743 |
|
280,971 |
|
7.73 |
|
| Commercial Platform: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Loans and leases |
|
1,457,270 |
|
125,392 |
|
8.60 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total Commercial
Platform |
|
1,457,270 |
|
125,392 |
|
8.60 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
$5,098,013 |
|
$406,363 |
|
7.98 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail Platform
Interest income for the Retail Platform was $221.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2000 as compared with $266.0
million for 1999 and $281.0 million for 1998. The average yield on interest-earning assets for the Retail Platform was 8.11% for the year ended December 31, 2000 as compared with 7.66% for 1999 and 7.73% for 1998.
The decrease in the Retail Platform’s interest income in 2000, as compared to 1999, was primarily due to a decrease
in average interest-earning assets partially offset by higher average yields. The decrease in average asset balances was due to lower average loan balances resulting from loan sales and/or securitizations effected in 2000 offset by increases in the
average balances of our mortgage-backed securities and investment securities portfolios. The increases in mortgage-backed securities and investment securities average balances were due to purchases of relatively higher-yielding GNMA securities
during the fourth quarter of 1999 and throughout 2000, purchases of higher-yielding Federal Home Loan Bank, sometimes referred to as FHLB, securities in the first half of the year and an increase in the average residual interest balance as a result
of our December 1999 and March 2000 auto securitizations. The increase in average asset yields was primarily due to the higher interest rate environment, the sales of lower-yielding mortgage loans and the purchases of higher-yielding mortgage-backed
and investment securities.
The decrease in the Retail Platform’s interest income in 1999, as compared to 1998, was attributable to lower
average asset balances and lower asset yields. The lower average asset balances was due to a decrease in average loan and mortgage-backed securities balances, resulting from the sale of $105 million in single-family COFI-based loans and the
repayments of higher-yielding mortgage-backed securities, offset by a slight increase in the average balances of our investment securities. The decrease in the platform’s average yield was due to several factors including the impact of the
declining interest rate environment during the first six months of 1999, the yield compression associated with competition, higher premium amortization attributable to higher prepayment speeds on our high loan-to-value home equity loans, and our
continued emphasis on higher-quality loans and leases.
Commercial Platform
Interest income for the Commercial Platform was $238.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2000 as compared with
$155.6 million for 1999 and $125.4 million for 1998. The average yield on interest-earning assets for the Commercial Platform was 9.35% for the year ended December 31, 2000 as compared with 8.65% 1999 and 8.60% for 1998.
The increases in the Commercial Platform’s interest income, from 1998 to 2000, were primarily due to higher average
loan and lease balances, higher investment securities balances, and higher average asset yields. The increases in the Commercial Platform’s average loan and lease balances and investment securities balances
reflect the shift in our asset mix toward more commercial bank-like products. The increases in the Commercial Platform’s average asset yields were primarily due to the impact of the shift from lower-yielding multi-family mortgage-based loans to
higher-yielding commercial business loans combined with the impact of the higher interest rate environment during 2000.
During April 2000, we completed a $268.2 million on-balance sheet franchise loan securitization within the Commercial
Platform. The securitization essentially enabled us to convert franchise loans into AAA-rated, credit-enhanced securities which helped us obtain lower-cost funding. The rising interest rate environment combined with a decrease in the interest rate
paid on the securities compressed our spread on these securities, prompting us to sell the securities at a $26.4 million loss during the fourth quarter of 2000.
Interest Expense
Deposits
Interest expense on our deposits was $176.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2000 as compared with $142.4 million
for 1999 and $149.7 million for 1998. The average cost of deposits was 4.71% for the year ended December 31, 2000 as compared with 4.11% for 1999 and 4.44% for 1998.
The increase in interest expense on deposits for 2000, as compared with 1999, was due to higher average deposit balances
combined with an increase in the cost of deposits. The increase in average balances was due to higher retail and brokered certificates of deposit balances, utilized to fund our expanding balance sheet during 2000, partially offset by lower
transaction account balances. The increase in the cost of our deposits was primarily associated with the rising interest rate environment and our increased usage of higher-cost certificates of deposit, including brokered certificates of
deposit.
The decrease in interest expense on deposits for 1999, as compared with 1998, was due to a decrease in the cost of
deposits partially offset by higher average deposit balances. The decrease in the cost of deposits resulted from a combination of factors, including our emphasis on lower-cost transaction accounts, our deposit pricing strategies and the declining
interest rate environment during the first six months of 1999, partially offset by an increase in higher-cost brokered certificates of deposit. The increase in average deposit balances was due to higher transaction account balances and brokered
certificates of deposit balances partially offset by lower retail certificates of deposit.
The following table summarizes our deposit costs by type and our transaction accounts as a percentage of retail deposits
for the periods indicated:
| |
|
For the Month Ended
December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
| Transaction accounts |
|
3.54 |
% |
|
3.26 |
% |
|
3.15 |
% |
| Retail certificates of deposit |
|
6.04 |
|
|
4.92 |
|
|
5.20 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total retail deposits |
|
4.89 |
|
|
4.07 |
|
|
4.20 |
|
| Brokered certificates of deposit |
|
7.16 |
|
|
6.18 |
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total deposits |
|
5.05 |
% |
|
4.30 |
% |
|
4.20 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Transaction accounts as a percentage of retail deposits |
|
46.20 |
% |
|
51.00 |
% |
|
49.80 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings
Interest expense on our borrowings, excluding the Capital Securities issued in December 1998, was $118.2 million for the
year ended December 31, 2000 as compared with $108.7 million for 1999 and $102.1 million for 1998. The average cost of borrowings was 6.62% for the year ended December 31, 2000 as compared with 5.78% for 1999 and 6.15% for 1998.
The increase in interest expense on borrowings for 2000, as compared with 1999, was attributable to the effects of the
rising interest rate environment on our borrowings combined with the utilization of higher-cost warehouse lines to fund our franchise loan production.
The increase in interest expense on borrowings for 1999, as compared with 1998, was primarily due to higher average
borrowing balances which were required to fund the growth in our balance sheet. This volume-related increase in interest expense was partially offset by a decline in the cost of borrowings, attributable to our refinancing and extending of maturities
on a significant portion of our Federal Home Loan Bank advances in October 1998 and the maturity of $50 million of 8.42% Senior Debentures on June 1, 1999. The impact of these factors was partially offset by the utilization of new funding sources
during 1999, including a LIBOR-based warehouse line with an all-in cost of approximately 7.92% and $50 million of 10% Subordinated Notes due 2009 issued by Bay View Bank on August 18, 1999.
The following tables illustrate the changes in net interest income due to changes in the rate and volume of our
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The variances include the effects of our acquisitions. Changes in rate and volume which cannot be segregated (i.e., changes in weighted-average interest rate multiplied by average portfolio
balance) have been allocated proportionately to the change in rate and the change in volume.
| |
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
2000 vs. 1999
|
| |
|
Rate
Variance
|
|
Volume
Variance
|
|
Total
Variance
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Interest income: |
|
|
|
| Loans and leases |
|
$ 60,792 |
|
|
$(70,430 |
) |
|
$ (9,638 |
) |
| Mortgage-backed securities |
|
4,510 |
|
|
19,037 |
|
|
23,547 |
|
| Investments |
|
6,818 |
|
|
17,809 |
|
|
24,627 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
72,120 |
|
|
(33,584 |
) |
|
38,536 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Interest expense: |
|
|
|
| Deposits |
|
21,743 |
|
|
12,432 |
|
|
34,175 |
|
| Borrowings |
|
14,719 |
|
|
(5,314 |
) |
|
9,405 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
36,462 |
|
|
7,118 |
|
|
43,580 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Change in net interest
income |
|
$ 35,658 |
|
|
$(40,702 |
) |
|
$ (5,044 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
1999 vs. 1998
|
| |
|
Rate
Variance
|
|
Volume
Variance
|
|
Total
Variance
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Interest income: |
|
|
|
| Loans and leases |
|
$ — |
|
|
$ 22,755 |
|
|
$ 22,755 |
|
| Mortgage-backed securities |
|
(655 |
) |
|
(10,194 |
) |
|
(10,849 |
) |
| Investments |
|
(449 |
) |
|
3,836 |
|
|
3,387 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
(1,104 |
) |
|
16,397 |
|
|
15,293 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Interest expense: |
|
|
|
| Deposits |
|
(11,017 |
) |
|
3,788 |
|
|
(7,229 |
) |
| Borrowings |
|
(5,623 |
) |
|
12,262 |
|
|
6,639 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
(16,640 |
) |
|
16,050 |
|
|
(590 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Change in net interest
income |
|
$ 15,536 |
|
|
$ 347 |
|
|
$ 15,883 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision For Losses on Loans and Leases
The provision for losses on loans and leases was $62.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2000 as compared with
$28.3 million for 1999 and $9.1 million for 1998. The increase in the provision for losses on loans and leases for 2000, as compared with 1999, was primarily due to higher provision levels within the Commercial Platform related to franchise loans.
Specifically, the higher provision level was necessary as a result of higher franchise loan balances during 2000 combined with the deterioration in the credit quality of franchise loans. The provision levels decreased for the Retail Platform due to
lower net charge-offs and declining loan balances. The increase in the provision for losses on loans and leases for 1999, as compared with 1998, was a result of our acquisitions combined with our internal loan and lease growth, principally within
our Commercial Platform, higher net charge-offs in the Retail Platform related to uninsured high loan-to-value home equity loans, and higher net charge-offs in the Commercial Platform related to a seasoning of the portfolio. See “Balance Sheet
Analysis—Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses” for further discussion.
The following table illustrates the provision for losses on loans and leases, by platform, for the periods
indicated:
| |
|
For the Year Ended
December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Retail Platform |
|
$10,354 |
|
$25,558 |
|
$9,114 |
| Commercial Platform |
|
52,246 |
|
2,753 |
|
— |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
$62,600 |
|
$28,311 |
|
$9,114 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest Income (Loss)
Noninterest income was $76.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2000 as compared with $91.5 million for 1999 and
$31.1 million for 1998. The decrease in noninterest income for 2000, as compared with 1999, was largely due to the net loss on sales of assets and liabilities associated with restructuring our balance sheet to reduce credit and concentration risk
associated with franchise assets and HLTV home equity loans. Offsetting these losses were higher auto leasing income and loan-related fees in the Retail Platform and higher loan servicing and fee income in the Commercial Platform. The increase in
noninterest income for 1999, as compared with 1998, was largely attributable to higher auto leasing income in the Retail Platform combined with higher net gains on the securitization and/or sale of loans and increases in account fees, loan fees and
charges and investment sales commissions. The following table illustrates noninterest income (loss), by platform, for the periods indicated:
| |
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Retail Platform |
|
$ 90,350 |
|
|
$84,658 |
|
$30,339 |
| Commercial Platform |
|
(13,708 |
) |
|
6,874 |
|
733 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
$ 76,642 |
|
|
$91,532 |
|
$31,072 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2000, noninterest income within our Retail Platform included $19.4 million in net losses from the sales of
single-family mortgage loans, high loan-to-value home equity loans and auto loans, $9.1 million in losses related to the revaluation of our retained interests in our auto loan securitizations combined with charges associated with the exercise of the
cleanup call on our 1997 auto loan securitization, and $2.1 million in losses related to our implementation of Statement No. 133, partially offset by a $2.1 million gain associated with the sale of servicing rights. Noninterest loss for our
Commercial Platform included $26.4 million in losses related to the sale of franchise asset-backed securities, a $4.9 million loss on the sale of substantially all of the assets and certain liabilities of Bankers Mutual, $2.6 million in net losses
from the sales of multi-family mortgage
loans, franchise loans, and commercial leases, and a $1.1 million write-down of an equity security. These losses were offset by a $10.0 million gain on the auction of $180 million of Federal Home Loan Bank liabilities with below-market interest
rates.
Noninterest income for 1999 primarily included a $5.2 million gain on the securitization and sale of $247 million of
auto loans in the Retail Platform and $4.1 million in net gains on loan sales in the Commercial Platform from the sales of multi-family loans. Noninterest income for 1998 included approximately $2.0 million in gains on sales of mortgage-backed
securities and a $940,000 loss on the settlement of forward sale contracts relating to mortgage-backed securities.
During 2000, we serviced off-balance sheet portfolios of franchise loans and multi-family loans associated with Bankers
Mutual. Servicing income on franchise loans was $3.6 million for 2000 and $341,000 for November and December of 1999. The franchise loan servicing portfolio totaled $2.4 billion and $2.2 billion at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. Servicing
income on Bankers Mutual’s multi-family loans through June 30, 2000, the effective date of the sale of substantially all of Bankers Mutual’s assets to Berkshire Mortgage Finance Limited Partnership, was $742,000 on a servicing portfolio
totaling approximately $3.4 billion. Servicing income on Bankers Mutual’s multi-family loans for November and December of 1999 was $169,000 on a servicing portfolio totaling $3.2 billion at December 31, 1999.
Noninterest Expense
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2000 were $158.6 million as compared with $117.1
million for 1999 and $113.6 million for 1998. Excluding special mention items, which are discussed below, the increases in general and administrative expenses, as compared with the respective prior periods, were primarily related to general and
administrative expenses associated with FMAC which we acquired in November 1999.
Our general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2000 included $5.8 million in special mention
items, as compared with $5.3 million in special mention items for 1999 and $10.4 million for 1998. Special mention items generally include items recognized during the period that we believe are significant and/or unusual in nature and therefore
useful to you in evaluating our performance and trends. These items may or may not be nonrecurring in nature.
Special mention items for 2000 included approximately $3.8 million in FMAC-related transition costs and other
operational charges including the consolidation of certain loan servicing operations, the closure of an FMAC satellite loan production office and the outsourcing of our internal audit function. Special mention items for 2000 also included $1.1
million in fees associated with our financial advisor, and $0.9 million in legal settlements expenses.
Special mention items for 1999 included approximately $1.1 million in severance payments, $1.0 million in acquisition
and integration costs (largely FMAC-related), $779,000 in auto-related restructuring charges, $705,000 in third-party Year 2000 compliance-related costs, and $598,000 in costs associated with repurchasing out-of-the-money stock options for possible
future reissuance. Special mention items for 1999 also included approximately $377,000 in collection-based fees associated with a $1.1 million state tax refund, $278,000 in costs associated with a debt offering which we did not consummate, $239,000
in costs associated with branch relocations and closures, and $180,000 in initial fees related to the listing of our securities on the New York Stock Exchange.
Special mention items for 1998 included approximately $6.9 million in acquisition and integration expenses related to
our acquisition of AFEH, $1.35 million in expenses related to the cancellation of our proposed
acquisition of PSB Lending Corporation, $814,000 in auto-related restructuring charges, $600,000 for a legal settlement related to the termination of a third-party data processing service contract, $253,000 in third-party Year 2000 compliance
related costs, $240,000 in branch closure expenses, and $233,000 in other expenses.
The following table illustrates general and administrative expenses, by platform, for the periods indicated:
| |
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Retail Platform |
|
$ 79,856 |
|
$ 76,309 |
|
$ 79,867 |
| Commercial Platform: |
| Direct general and administrative expenses |
|
31,547 |
|
14,923 |
|
9,501 |
Direct general and administrative expenses—FMAC loan
production |
|
15,561 |
|
2,395 |
|
— |
Direct general and administrative expenses—Bankers
Mutual |
|
6,311 |
|
2,123 |
|
— |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total Commercial
Platform |
|
53,419 |
|
19,441 |
|
9,501 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Subtotal |
|
133,275 |
|
95,750 |
|
89,368 |
| Indirect corporate overhead(1) |
|
25,315 |
|
21,366 |
|
24,199 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
$158,590 |
|
$117,116 |
|
$113,567 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Amount represents indirect corporate expenses not specifically identifiable with, or allocable to, our business
platforms.
|
The following table illustrates general and administrative expenses, excluding the special mention items as previously
discussed, by platform, for the periods indicated:
| |
|
Excluding Special Mention Items for
the Year Ended December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Retail Platform |
|
$ 78,480 |
|
$ 73,232 |
|
$ 74,230 |
| Commercial Platform: |
| Direct general and administrative expenses |
|
30,897 |
|
14,783 |
|
9,501 |
Direct general and administrative expenses—FMAC loan
production |
|
14,436 |
|
2,395 |
|
— |
Direct general and administrative expenses—Bankers
Mutual |
|
6,103 |
|
2,123 |
|
— |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Commercial
Platform |
|
51,436 |
|
19,301 |
|
9,501 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Subtotal |
|
129,916 |
|
92,533 |
|
83,731 |
| Indirect corporate overhead(1) |
|
22,890 |
|
19,280 |
|
19,470 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
$152,806 |
|
$111,813 |
|
$103,201 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Amount represents indirect corporate expenses not specifically identifiable with, or allocable to, our business
platforms.
|
Retail Platform
The increase in the Retail Platform’s general and administrative expenses, excluding special mention items, for the
year ended December 31, 2000, as compared with 1999, was due primarily to inflationary pressures, including annual salary increases. The decrease in the Retail Platform’s general and administrative expenses, excluding special mention items, for
the year ended December 31, 1999, as compared with 1998, was primarily due to cost savings initiatives implemented and other efficiencies realized.
Commercial Platform
The increases in the Commercial Platform’s general and administrative expenses, excluding special mention items,
for the year ended December 31, 2000, as compared with 1999, and for the year ended December 31, 1999, as compared with 1998, were directly attributable to our acquisition of FMAC effective November 1, 1999 and the impact of platform growth. The
Commercial Platform’s general and administrative expenses for 2000 included $15.6 million of franchise loan production expenses, $6.3 million of Bankers Mutual expenses, and $13.5 million in remaining FMAC general and administrative expenses.
As previously discussed, our franchise loan production and related operations were shut down as of September 30, 2000 and our Bankers Mutual subsidiary was sold effective June 30, 2000. The Commercial Platform’s general and administrative
expenses for 1999, excluding special mention items, included $2.4 million of incremental franchise loan production expenses, $2.1 million of Bankers Mutual expenses, and $4.4 million in remaining FMAC general and administrative expenses.
Indirect Corporate Overhead
The increase in indirect corporate overhead, excluding special mention items, for the year ended December 31, 2000, as
compared with 1999, was due to inflationary pressures, including annual salary increases, and higher expenses necessary to support our expanding business activities (primarily related to FMAC). The decrease in indirect corporate overhead, excluding
special mention items, for the year ended December 31, 1999, as compared with 1998, was directly attributable to cost savings initiatives and efficiencies.
The following table illustrates the ratio of general and administrative expenses to average interest-earning assets,
including our auto-related operating leased assets and auto-related securitized assets, by platform, for the periods indicated. The fluctuations in the general and administrative expense ratios are largely driven by the fluctuations in general and
administrative expenses, as previously discussed.
| |
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| General and administrative expenses |
|
$ 158,590 |
|
|
$ 117,116 |
|
|
$ 113,567 |
|
Average total assets, including auto-related securitized
assets |
|
$6,711,135 |
|
|
$5,955,213 |
|
|
$5,607,221 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses to average total
assets, including auto-related securitized assets |
|
2.36 |
% |
|
1.97 |
% |
|
2.03 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Another measure that management uses to monitor our level of general and administrative expenses is the efficiency
ratio. The efficiency ratio is calculated by dividing the amount of general and administrative expenses by operating revenues, defined as net interest income, as adjusted to include expenses associated with the Capital Securities, the excess of our
leasing-related rental income over leasing-related depreciation expense, and other noninterest income. Prior to our November 1, 1999 acquisition of FMAC, gains and losses from loan sales and securitizations were excluded in operating revenues as
this was a non-recurring operating activity. This ratio reflects the level of general and administrative expenses required to generate $1 of operating revenue. The following table illustrates the efficiency ratio for the periods
indicated:
| |
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| General and administrative expenses |
|
$158,590 |
|
|
$117,116 |
|
|
$113,567 |
|
| Operating revenues, as defined |
|
$173,405 |
|
|
$215,112 |
|
|
$177,785 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Efficiency ratio |
|
91.5 |
% |
|
54.4 |
% |
|
63.9 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in the efficiency ratio for 2000, as compared with 1999, was due to higher general and administrative
expenses, primarily associated with FMAC, combined with a decrease in operating revenues, as defined, resulting from the impact of losses associated with the sales of assets during the third and fourth quarters of 2000, partially offset by higher
net leasing-related rental income. Our efficiency ratio excluding the impact of FMAC-related asset sales and general and administrative expenses was 64.8% for the year ended December 31, 2000. The improvement in the efficiency ratio for 1999, as
compared with 1998, was due to higher net interest income, higher net leasing-related rental income, and higher other noninterest income, including a $1.1 million state tax refund recognized during the first quarter of 1999, partially offset by
higher general and administrative expenses and the expenses associated with our Capital Securities.
Restructuring Charges—FMAC
Restructuring charges consist primarily of severance, occupancy, and related facility costs associated with the shut
down of our franchise lending division effective September 30, 2000. Restructuring charges totaled $9.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2000 (See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Restructuring Charges” at Item 8
“Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for further details of our FMAC restructuring).
Revaluation of FMAC-Related Assets
During 2000, certain FMAC-related assets were revalued resulting in a $101.9 million pre-tax expense. The revaluation
included $35.4 million in adjustments resulting primarily from permanent impairments to our franchise-related residual and servicing assets, reflecting higher loss assumptions and a higher discount rate. The revaluation also included a $66.5 million
mark-to-market charge on our portfolio of franchise loans held-for-sale, reflecting estimated bulk-sale pricing versus pricing based on smaller loan pool sales to multiple investors.
Leasing Expense
Leasing expense represents expenses related to our auto leasing activities which began in April 1998. Because the leases
are accounted for as operating leases, the corresponding assets are capitalized and depreciated to their estimated residual values over their lease terms. This depreciation expense is included in leasing expenses, along with the amortization of
capitalized initial direct lease costs. Leasing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2000 were $69.4 million as compared with $40.2 million for 1999 and $7.7 million for 1998. The increases in leasing expenses were due to growth in our
auto-related operating lease portfolio. We ceased purchasing auto leases on June 30, 2000 when our agreement with Lendco Financial Services expired.
Capital Securities
On December 21, 1998, we issued $90 million in Capital Securities through Bay View Capital I, a business trust formed to
issue the securities. The Capital Securities, which were sold in an underwritten public offering, pay quarterly cumulative dividends at an annual rate of 9.76% of the liquidation value of $25 per share. Dividend expense on the Capital Securities was
$9.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2000 as compared with $8.9 million for 1999 and $244,000 for 1998.
In September of 2000, we entered into an agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank which requires that we obtain their
approval prior to disbursing any dividends associated with our Capital Securities. For the third and fourth quarters of 2000, our requests for approval were denied. As a result, pursuant to the terms of the Capital Securities, the Company has
deferred distributions until such time as approval can be obtained. The Company fully intends to continue to seek such approval; however, it cannot predict when approval may be obtained. During this deferral period, distributions to which holders
are entitled will continue to accrue at an annual rate of 9.76% of the liquidation amount of $25 per Capital Security, plus accumulated additional distributions at the same rate, compounded quarterly, on any unpaid distributions (to the extent
permitted by law). Holders of the Capital Securities at the time the distribution of dividends is resumed will receive the cumulative deferred distributions plus the cumulative interest thereon.
Real Estate Owned
The net expense related to our real estate loan operations, including net losses or recoveries on real estate owned, was
$65,000 for the year ended December 31, 2000 as compared with net income of $238,000 for 1999 and $240,000 for 1998.
Amortization of Intangible Assets
Amortization expense related to intangible assets was $20.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2000 as compared
with $13.7 million for 1999 and $11.4 million for 1998. The increases in amortization of intangible assets were due to the additional amortization of goodwill and core deposit intangibles generated in conjunction with our aforementioned
acquisitions, all of which were accounted for under the purchase method of accounting.
Write-off of Intangible Assets—FMAC
In connection with the shutdown of FMAC’s lending operations as of September 30, 2000, goodwill of $192.6 million
was written off, representing the entire unamortized balance associated with FMAC.
Income Taxes
Income tax benefit was $55.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2000 as compared with income tax expense of $25.1
million for 1999 and $21.2 million for 1998. Our effective tax rate for 2000 was 14.6% as compared with 46.4% for 1999 and 48.3% for 1998. Our effective tax rate differs from the statutory rate due primarily to nondeductible goodwill write-off and
amortization and the establishment of a $26 million valuation allowance against our gross deferred tax assets. (See Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Income Taxes,” at Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data” for further discussion).
Non-GAAP Performance Measures
The following measures of normalized net interest income and normalized net interest margin are not measures of
performance in accordance with GAAP. These measures should not be considered alternatives to net interest income and net interest margin as indicators of our operating performance. These measures are included because we believe they are useful tools
to assist you in assessing our performance and trends. These measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.
Normalized Net Interest Margin
Normalized net interest income and net interest margin include net rental income from our auto leasing activities (that
is, the excess of rental income over depreciation expense on auto-related leased assets), which are principally funded by our deposits, and also include expenses related to our Capital Securities. Because our auto leases are accounted for as
operating leases, the rental income is reflected as noninterest income and the related expenses, including depreciation expense, are reflected as noninterest expenses, in accordance with GAAP. Normalized net interest income also excludes certain
nonrecurring interest income and interest expense items.
Normalized net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2000 was $194.0 million as compared with $184.7 million
for 1999 and $159.1 million for 1998. Normalized net interest margin for the year ended December 31, 2000 was 3.35% as compared with 3.30% for 1999 and 3.08% for 1998.
The following table illustrates normalized net interest income and net interest margin, by platform, for the periods
indicated:
| |
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
| |
|
Net
Interest
Income
|
|
Net
Interest
Margin
|
|
Net
Interest
Income
|
|
Net
Interest
Margin
|
|
Net
Interest
Income
|
|
Net
Interest
Margin
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Retail Platform |
|
$ 94,530 |
|
2.91 |
% |
|
$114,237 |
|
3.00 |
% |
|
$104,871 |
|
2.83 |
% |
| Commercial Platform |
|
99,496 |
|
3.90 |
|
|
70,461 |
|
3.92 |
|
|
54,204 |
|
3.72 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
$194,026 |
|
3.35 |
% |
|
$184,698 |
|
3.30 |
% |
|
$159,075 |
|
3.08 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increases in normalized net interest income and net interest margin, as compared with the respective prior periods,
were largely attributable to increases in average interest-earning assets combined with higher net rental income from our auto leasing activities, partially offset by the impact of our Capital Securities issued on December 21, 1998.
Our cost of borrowings, in accordance with GAAP, does not include the impact of the cost associated with the $90 million
of Capital Securities issued on December 21, 1998. Had this expense been included, our cost of borrowings would have been 6.79% for the year ended December 31, 2000 and 5.97% for the year ended December 31, 1999, representing increases of 17 basis
points and 19 basis points, respectively.
The following table illustrates average interest-earning assets, including our auto-related operating leased assets, by
platform, for the years indicated:
| |
|
Average Balances for the Year Ended
December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Retail Platform |
|
$3,245,417 |
|
$3,804,308 |
|
$3,706,565 |
| Commercial Platform |
|
2,554,447 |
|
1,799,220 |
|
1,457,270 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
$5,799,864 |
|
$5,603,528 |
|
$5,163,835 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in the Retail Platform’s average interest-earning assets, including our auto-related operating lease
assets, and the corresponding increase in the Commercial Platform’s average interest-earning assets, in 2000, as compared to 1999, reflect the shift in our asset mix toward more commercial bank-like products. The Retail Platform’s average
interest-earning assets were also impacted from 1999 through 2000 by loan sales and securitizations throughout this period, as discussed elsewhere herein or previously disclosed.
The increase in the Retail Platform’s average interest-earning assets, including our auto-related operating lease
assets, in 1999, as compared with 1998, was directly attributable to the growth in our auto-related operating lease assets resulting from the continued growth in our auto leasing activities. The increase in the Commercial Platform’s average
interest-earning assets in 1999, as compared with 1998, was primarily due to purchases of franchise loans and the acquisition of FMAC partially offset by the sale of lower-yielding multi-family mortgage-based loans during the period.
The following table illustrates interest-earning assets, including our auto-related operating leased assets, by
platform, as of the dates indicated:
| |
|
At
December 31,
2000
|
|
At
December 31,
1999
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
| Retail Platform |
|
$2,207,366 |
|
$3,658,735 |
| Commercial Platform |
|
2,178,619 |
|
2,219,536 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
$4,385,985 |
|
$5,878,271 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Analysis
Our total assets were $5.4 billion at December 31, 2000 as compared with $6.5 billion at December 31, 1999 and $5.6
billion at December 31, 1998. The decrease in total assets from 1999 to 2000 was primarily related to loan securitizations and/or sales and the write-off of assets associated with the restructuring of our franchise lending division. The increase in
total assets from 1998 to 1999 was largely related to the purchase of $814 million in franchise loans during 1999 and the acquisition of FMAC.
During the year ended December 31, 2000, we sold $423.2 million of single-family mortgage loans, $244.0 million of high
loan-to-value home equity loans, $120.0 million of franchise loans, $58.5 million of multi-family mortgage loans, and $26.5 million of commercial equipment leases. In addition, we securitized and/or sold $405.7 million of auto loans and completed a
$268.2 million on-balance sheet franchise loan securitization during the second quarter of 2000. This transaction effectively transferred $268.2 million in franchise loans to investment securities, initially generating $264.2 million in asset-backed
securities classified as held-to-maturity with the balance going to retained interests in securitizations classified as available-for-sale. During the fourth quarter of 2000, these franchise-related asset-backed securities were transferred to
available-for-sale under the provisions of Statement No. 133 and subsequently sold.
As previously discussed, in conjunction with the restructuring of our franchise lending division in the third quarter of
2000, we wrote-off $192.6 million of goodwill, which represented the remaining balance associated with FMAC during 2000. During 2000, we also revalued certain FMAC-related assets, including retained interests in securitizations, loans held-for-sale
and servicing assets, which resulted in a write-down of $101.9 million.
Securities
Our securities activities are primarily conducted by Bay View Bank. Bay View Bank has historically purchased securities
to supplement our loan production. The majority of the securities purchased are high-quality mortgage-backed securities, including securities issued by GNMA, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and senior tranches of private issue collateralized mortgage
obligations, or CMOs. In addition to these securities, we also hold retained interests in loan and lease securitizations and hold investment securities such as U.S. government agency notes and other short-term securities.
The following table illustrates our securities portfolio as of the dates indicated:
| |
|
At December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Investment securities(1) |
|
$ 33,009 |
|
$ 49,063 |
|
$ 5,319 |
| Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| GNMA, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac |
|
341 |
|
10,143 |
|
13,143 |
| CMOs |
|
237 |
|
336 |
|
473 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
$ 33,587 |
|
$ 59,542 |
|
$ 18,935 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Held-to-maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Investment securities(1) |
|
$ — |
|
$ 9,997 |
|
$ — |
| Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| GNMA, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac |
|
627,300 |
|
472,019 |
|
403,512 |
| Other financial intermediaries |
|
11,827 |
|
20,633 |
|
41,759 |
| CMOs |
|
2,923 |
|
151,582 |
|
176,502 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
$642,050 |
|
$654,231 |
|
$621,773 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
See Note 5 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, “Investment Securities”, at Item 8, “Financial Statements
and Supplementary Data” for further detail on our investment securities portfolio.
|
During 2000, we purchased $327.8 million of GNMA securities and $35.3 million of Federal Home Loan Bank callable notes
for our held-to-maturity portfolio. These securities receive favorable regulatory capital risk-weighting and help diversify our balance sheet. In addition, we completed an on-balance sheet franchise loan securitization during the second quarter of
2000. This transaction initially generated $264.2 million in asset-backed securities held-to-maturity and $12.1 million in retained interests classified as available-for-sale. Under the provisions of Statement No. 133, we transferred these
franchise-related asset-backed securities to available-for-sale and subsequently sold them in December 2000 as a result of declining spreads on these fixed-rate securities. During 2000, we revalued franchise-related retained interests in loan and
lease securitizations by $26.3 million, as previously discussed.
During 1999, we purchased $172.0 million in mortgage-backed securities and $10.0 million in Federal Home Loan Bank
callable notes which we used as collateral for borrowings. In connection with our acquisition of FMAC, we acquired $35.0 million in retained interests in franchise loan and lease securitizations and asset-backed securities. In December of 1999, we
securitized and sold $247 million in auto loans and retained an interest in this securitization with an initial balance of $10.0 million.
In connection with our adoption of Statement No. 133 on October 1, 2000, we also transferred $231.0 million of
mortgage-backed securities to our available-for-sale portfolio. We sold $108.2 million of GNMA securities and $131.7 million of private-label mortgage-backed securities from our available-for-sale portfolio during 2000. There were no sales of
mortgage-backed securities from our available-for-sale portfolio in 1999. In 1998, we sold $237.7 million in mortgage-backed securities from our available-for-sale portfolio, including securities acquired in connection with our acquisition of AFEH.
A portion of these mortgage-backed securities was replaced by $201.7 million in CMOs purchased during 1998, which were classified as held-to-maturity. Also during 1998, we sold $2 million in investment securities available-for-sale and a $5.0
million Federal Farm Credit Bank callable bank note was called. We do not maintain a trading portfolio. Unrealized gains of $10,000 and unrealized losses of $293,000 and $202,000 on securities classified as available-for-sale were included in
stockholders’ equity (net of tax) at December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998, respectively.
At December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, we did not hold any securities that were issued by a single party which exceeded
10% of our stockholders’ equity balance, excluding securities issued by the U.S. government or U.S. government agencies and corporations.
Mortgage-backed securities pose risks not associated with fixed maturity bonds, primarily related to the ability of the
borrower to prepay the underlying loan with or without penalty. This risk, known as prepayment risk, may cause the mortgage-backed securities to remain outstanding for a period of time different than that assumed at the time of purchase. When
interest rates decline, prepayments generally tend to increase, causing the average expected remaining maturity of the mortgage-backed securities to decline. Conversely, if interest rates rise, prepayments tend to decrease, lengthening the average
expected remaining maturity of the mortgage-backed securities. The following table illustrates the remaining contractual principal maturities and weighted-average yields on our mortgage-backed securities held at December 31, 2000. The
weighted-average yield is computed using the amortized cost of available-for-sale securities, which are reported at fair value. Expected remaining maturities of mortgage-backed securities will generally differ from their contractual maturities
because borrowers may have the right to prepay obligations with or without penalties.
| |
|
Within One Year
|
|
After One Year
Through Five Years
|
|
After Five Years
Through Ten Years
|
|
After Ten Years
|
|
Total
|
| |
|
Amount
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Yield
|
|
Amount
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Yield
|
|
Amount
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Yield
|
|
Amount
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Yield
|
|
Amount
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Yield
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| GNMA, Fannie Mae |
|
$ — |
|
— |
|
$ — |
|
— |
|
|
$ 340 |
|
6.56 |
% |
|
$ — |
|
— |
|
|
$ 340 |
|
6.56 |
% |
| CMOs |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
262 |
|
5.52 |
% |
|
262 |
|
5.52 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortized
cost |
|
$ — |
|
— |
|
$ — |
|
— |
|
|
$ 340 |
|
6.56 |
% |
|
$ 262 |
|
5.52 |
% |
|
$ 602 |
|
6.11 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Fair value |
|
$ — |
|
|
|
$ — |
|
|
|
|
$ 341 |
|
|
|
|
$ 237 |
|
|
|
|
$ 578 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Held-to-maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GNMA, Fannie Mae
and Freddie Mac |
|
$ — |
|
— |
|
$ 373 |
|
9.51 |
% |
|
$85,359 |
|
6.89 |
% |
|
$541,568 |
|
7.51 |
% |
|
$627,300 |
|
7.43 |
% |
Other financial
Intermediaries |
|
— |
|
— |
|
545 |
|
7.73 |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
11,282 |
|
8.88 |
|
|
11,827 |
|
8.83 |
|
| CMOs |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
2,923 |
|
6.75 |
|
|
2,923 |
|
6.76 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortized
cost |
|
$ — |
|
— |
|
$ 918 |
|
8.46 |
% |
|
$85,359 |
|
6.89 |
% |
|
$555,773 |
|
7.54 |
% |
|
$642,050 |
|
7.45 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Fair value |
|
$ — |
|
|
|
$ 942 |
|
|
|
|
$84,262 |
|
|
|
|
$563,993 |
|
|
|
|
$649,197 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and Leases
Loan and Lease Portfolio Composition
Our loan and lease portfolio reflects the activity of our two business segments, or platforms. The Retail Platform
consists of single-family real estate loans, home equity loans and lines of credit, and auto loans and leases. We ceased our single-family loan origination operations in 1996 in conjunction with our strategic plan to change-out these assets for
commercial bank-like assets with higher risk-adjusted yields. The Commercial Platform includes multi-family and commercial real estate loans, franchise loans, asset-based loans, factoring loans and commercial leases. The following table shows the
composition of our gross loan and lease portfolio as of the dates indicated:
| |
|
At December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
|
1997
|
|
1996
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
% of
Total
|
|
Amount
|
|
% of
Total
|
|
Amount
|
|
% of
Total
|
|
Amount
|
|
% of
Total
|
|
Amount
|
|
% of
Total
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Loans and Leases Receivable: |
| Retail Platform: |
| Single-family mortgage loans(1) |
|
$ 392,047 |
|
12.5 |
% |
|
$ 940,235 |
|
21.6 |
% |
|
$1,515,413 |
|
36.2 |
% |
|
$ 550,506 |
|
22.9 |
% |
|
$ 692,086 |
|
27.6 |
% |
| Home equity loans and lines of credit |
|
302,897 |
|
9.6 |
% |
|
648,676 |
|
14.9 |
% |
|
622,797 |
|
14.9 |
% |
|
103,715 |
|
4.3 |
% |
|
57,815 |
|
2.3 |
% |
| Auto loans(2) |
|
287,020 |
|
9.1 |
% |
|
496,901 |
|
11.4 |
% |
|
546,806 |
|
13.0 |
% |
|
298,627 |
|
12.4 |
% |
|
315,439 |
|
12.6 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total retail loans |
|
981,964 |
|
31.2 |
% |
|
2,085,812 |
|
47.9 |
% |
|
2,685,016 |
|
64.1 |
% |
|
952,848 |
|
39.6 |
% |
|
1,065,340 |
|
42.5 |
% |
| Commercial Platform: |
| Multi-family mortgage loans |
|
611,484 |
|
19.4 |
% |
|
622,835 |
|
14.3 |
% |
|
1,015,980 |
|
24.2 |
% |
|
1,026,148 |
|
42.6 |
% |
|
1,048,291 |
|
41.9 |
% |
| Commercial mortgage loans |
|
339,764 |
|
10.8 |
% |
|
365,712 |
|
8.4 |
% |
|
338,220 |
|
8.1 |
% |
|
348,754 |
|
14.5 |
% |
|
381,822 |
|
15.2 |
% |
| Franchise loans(1) |
|
779,922 |
|
24.8 |
% |
|
952,243 |
|
21.9 |
% |
|
— |
|
0.0 |
% |
|
— |
|
0.0 |
% |
|
— |
|
0.0 |
% |
| Asset-based loans, factoring loans and commercial
leases |
|
353,362 |
|
11.2 |
% |
|
254,671 |
|
5.8 |
% |
|
113,210 |
|
2.7 |
% |
|
54,120 |
|
2.3 |
% |
|
— |
|
0.0 |
% |
| Business loans |
|
81,365 |
|
2.6 |
% |
|
72,977 |
|
1.7 |
% |
|
39,039 |
|
0.9 |
% |
|
24,855 |
|
1.0 |
% |
|
10,203 |
|
0.4 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial loans and leases |
|
2,165,897 |
|
68.8 |
% |
|
2,268,438 |
|
52.1 |
% |
|
1,506,449 |
|
35.9 |
% |
|
1,453,877 |
|
60.4 |
% |
|
1,440 ,316 |
|
57.5 |
% |
|
Gross loans and leases(3) |
|
$3,147,861 |
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$4,354,250 |
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$4,191,465 |
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$2,406,725 |
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$2,505,656 |
|
100.0 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Balances include $8.9 million of single-family mortgage loans held-for-sale and $336.3 million of franchise loans
held-for-sale.
|
(2)
|
Auto loan totals exclude auto-related operating lease assets.
|
(3)
|
Gross loans and leases exclude premiums and discounts, deferred fees and costs, and the allowance for losses on loans and
leases.
|
The decrease in retail and commercial loans and leases in 2000, as compared with 1999, was primarily due to loan sales
effected throughout the year. During 2000, we sold $423.2 million of single-family mortgage loans, $244.0 million of high loan-to-value home equity loans, $120.0 million of franchise loans, $58.5 million of multi-family mortgage loans, and $26.5
million of commercial equipment leases. In addition, we securitized and/or sold $405.7 million of auto loans and completed a $268.2 million on-balance sheet franchise loan securitization during the second quarter of 2000 that effectively transferred
this balance to investment securities. Our loan sales during the year were consistent with our efforts to restructure our balance sheet and position ourselves for 2001. The reduction in single-family loans, high loan-to-value home equity loans, and
franchise loans reduced both our geographic concentration risk and overall credit risk profile, and improved regulatory capital.
The decrease in single-family loans in 1999, as compared with 1998, was primarily due to loan repayments and scheduled
amortization. We also sold $105 million in single-family COFI-based loans in 1999 to reduce our exposure to this lagging index. The decrease in multi-family loans from 1999, as compared with 1998, was primarily related to our sale of $450 million in
multi-family COFI-based loans, again, to reduce our exposure to COFI, reduce our geographic concentration risk, and also to realize our strategy of changing-out our assets from real estate-based loans to commercial and consumer assets. We also sold
$79.9 million of Bankers Mutual multi-family production and $43.2 million of home equity loans in 1999. Additionally, we securitized and sold $247 million in auto loans in 1999. There were no loan sales in 1998.
Loans and leases held-for-sale totaled $345.2 million as of December 31, 2000, of which approximately $336.3 million
represented franchise loans held-for-sale and the remainder represented multi-family loans held-for-sale. We are actively pursuing opportunities to sell our remaining held-for-sale franchise loan portfolio as the potential sale of these loans would
not only free-up capital to facilitate the paydown of our higher-cost funding, but also effectively reduce our concentration in franchise assets. During 2000, we recognized a mark-to-market adjustment on this portfolio of $66.5 million reflecting
estimated bulk-sale pricing.
The following table illustrates the composition of our fixed- and adjustable-rate gross loan and lease portfolio (before
premiums and discounts, deferred fees and costs and the allowance for losses on loans and leases) as of the dates indicated:
| |
|
At December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Fixed-rate loans and leases: |
| Mortgage |
|
$ 256,059 |
|
$ 316,360 |
|
$ 620,603 |
| Home Equity |
|
228,321 |
|
564,333 |
|
506,338 |
| Auto |
|
287,020 |
|
496,901 |
|
545,431 |
| Commercial |
|
105,777 |
|
96,499 |
|
19,192 |
| Franchise |
|
490,634 |
|
761,794 |
|
— |
| Business |
|
81,365 |
|
72,977 |
|
39,039 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
1,449,176 |
|
2,308,864 |
|
1,730,603 |
| Adjustable-rate loans and leases: |
| Mortgage |
|
1,087,236 |
|
1,612,422 |
|
2,249,010 |
| Home Equity |
|
74,576 |
|
84,343 |
|
116,459 |
| Auto |
|
— |
|
— |
|
1,375 |
| Commercial |
|
247,585 |
|
158,172 |
|
94,018 |
| Franchise |
|
289,288 |
|
190,449 |
|
— |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
1,698,685 |
|
2,045,386 |
|
2,460,862 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
$3,147,861 |
|
$4,354,250 |
|
$4,191,465 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table illustrates the remaining contractual maturity distribution of our fixed- and adjustable-rate gross
loan and lease portfolio (before premiums and discounts, deferred fees and costs and the allowance for losses on loans and leases) at December 31, 2000:
| |
|
At December 31, 2000
|
| |
|
One Year
or Less
|
|
After One
Year
Through
Five Years
|
|
After Five
Years
|
|
Total
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Fixed-rate loans and leases: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Mortgage |
|
$ 1,433 |
|
$ 11,482 |
|
$ 243,144 |
|
$ 256,059 |
| Home Equity |
|
1,838 |
|
10,369 |
|
216,114 |
|
228,321 |
| Auto |
|
2,813 |
|
73,921 |
|
210,286 |
|
287,020 |
| Commercial |
|
55,140 |
|
50,637 |
|
— |
|
105,777 |
| Franchise |
|
735 |
|
14,488 |
|
475,411 |
|
490,634 |
| Business |
|
43,941 |
|
34,196 |
|
3,228 |
|
81,365 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
105,900 |
|
195,093 |
|
1,148,183 |
|
1,449,176 |
| Adjustable-rate loans and leases: |
| Mortgage |
|
16,008 |
|
16,648 |
|
1,054,580 |
|
1,087,236 |
| Home Equity |
|
3,257 |
|
6,573 |
|
64,746 |
|
74,576 |
| Commercial |
|
60,363 |
|
168,756 |
|
18,466 |
|
247,585 |
| Franchise |
|
29,294 |
|
24,578 |
|
235,416 |
|
289,288 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
108,922 |
|
216,555 |
|
1,373,208 |
|
1,698,685 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
$214,822 |
|
$411,648 |
|
$2,521,391 |
|
$3,147,861 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan and Lease Originations and Purchases
The following table illustrates gross loans and leases, including operating lease assets, originated and purchased for
the years indicated:
| |
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Loan and Lease Production: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Originations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Home equity loans and
lines of credit |
|
$ 71,883 |
|
$ 64,624 |
|
$ 39,301 |
| Auto loans and
leases(1) |
|
403,336 |
|
682,827 |
|
565,272 |
| Multi-family and
commercial mortgage loans |
|
168,520 |
|
250,562 |
|
150,677 |
| Franchise
loans(2) |
|
299,878 |
|
142,241 |
|
— |
| Bankers Mutual
multi-family loans(2)(3) |
|
220,146 |
|
78,500 |
|
— |
Asset-based loans,
factoring loans and commercial
leases |
|
150,545 |
|
164,297 |
|
75,584 |
| Business loans |
|
67,078 |
|
68,690 |
|
29,790 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total originations |
|
1,381,386 |
|
1,451,741 |
|
860,624 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Purchases: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Home equity
loans |
|
826 |
|
178,815 |
|
454,901 |
| Auto loans(4) |
|
25,017 |
|
135,504 |
|
71,773 |
| Mortgage loans |
|
2,006 |
|
26,472 |
|
421,458 |
| Franchise loans |
|
— |
|
813,988 |
|
— |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchases |
|
27,849 |
|
1,154,779 |
|
948,132 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loan and lease production |
|
$1,409,235 |
|
$2,606,520 |
|
$1,808,756 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes auto-related operating lease assets totaling $114.6 million for 2000, $335.2 million for 1999, and $187.9 million
for 1998, which are not included in our total loan and lease portfolio in accordance with GAAP.
|
(2)
|
Represents franchise loans and Bankers Mutual multi-family loans originated subsequent to the acquisition of FMAC on November
1, 1999. Effective September 30, 2000, our franchise lending division was shut down. Effective June 30, 2000, substantially all of the assets and liabilities of Bankers Mutual were sold.
|
(3)
|
100% of Bankers Mutual multi-family mortgage loans were originated and sold through seller-servicer programs administered by
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
|
(4)
|
Auto loan and lease purchases for the year ended December 31, 2000, included $22.2 million related to the repurchase of loans
as a result of exercising the cleanup call on our 1997 auto loan securitization.
|
Our loan and lease origination and purchase activity during 2000 and 1999 were primarily focused on consumer and
commercial assets which provide higher risk-adjusted yields compared to the traditional mortgage-based assets. Our mortgage loan originations and purchases consist primarily of multi-family and commercial real estate loans. Single-family mortgage
loan originations ceased during 1996. We supplemented our originations in 1999 and 1998 with a significant amount of loan and lease purchases. The franchise loans purchased in 1999 were originated by FMAC. The mortgage loan purchases in 1998
included $200 million of loans acquired primarily to assist Bay View Bank in meeting its Community Reinvestment Act, sometimes referred to as CRA, regulatory requirements.
Credit Quality
We define nonperforming assets as nonaccrual loans and leases, real estate owned, defaulted mortgage-backed securities,
and other repossessed assets. We define nonaccrual loans and leases as loans and leases 90 days or more delinquent as to principal and interest payments (unless the principal and interest are well secured and in the process of collection) and loans
and leases less than 90 days delinquent designated as nonperforming when we determine that the full collection of principal and/or interest is doubtful. We do not record interest on nonaccrual loans and leases.
The following table illustrates our nonperforming assets as of the dates indicated:
| |
|
At December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
|
1997
|
|
1996
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Nonaccrual loans and leases |
|
$100,148 |
|
$22,918 |
|
$14,700 |
|
$10,991 |
|
$16,125 |
| Real estate owned |
|
1,041 |
|
2,467 |
|
2,666 |
|
4,146 |
|
7,387 |
| Other repossessed assets |
|
524 |
|
554 |
|
654 |
|
629 |
|
798 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Nonperforming assets |
|
$101,713 |
|
$25,939 |
|
$18,020 |
|
$15,766 |
|
$24,310 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in total nonperforming assets in 2000, as compared to 1999, was primarily due to an increase in
nonperforming assets within our franchise loan sector. Nonperforming assets within the franchise loan sector represented approximately 71% of the 2000 total and included $71.3 million in nonaccrual franchise loans and $1.0 million of franchise real
estate owned at December 31, 2000. In addition, nonperforming assets included approximately $23 million of franchise loans that are technically performing as agreed but require classification as nonperforming assets according to regulatory
guidelines. We have reserves totaling approximately 10% of our franchise loan portfolio classified as held-for-investment.
Our total nonperforming assets in 1999 included $8.7 million of nonaccrual franchise loans and $1.4 million of franchise
real estate owned at December 31, 1999. Our loan and lease portfolio did not include franchise loans prior to 1999.
The following table illustrates, by platform, nonperforming assets and nonperforming assets as a percentage of
consolidated assets:
| |
|
Nonperforming Assets as a Percentage of
Consolidated Total Assets
|
| |
|
At December 31,
2000
|
|
At December 31,
1999
|
|
At December 31,
1998
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Retail Platform: |
| Single-family mortgage |
|
$ 4,599 |
|
0.09 |
% |
|
$ 5,121 |
|
0.08 |
% |
|
$10,813 |
|
0.19 |
% |
| Home equity |
|
3,919 |
|
0.07 |
|
|
2,958 |
|
0.04 |
|
|
2,035 |
|
0.04 |
|
| Auto |
|
706 |
|
0.01 |
|
|
1,307 |
|
0.02 |
|
|
1,090 |
|
0.02 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total Retail
Platform |
|
9,224 |
|
0.17 |
|
|
9,386 |
|
0.14 |
|
|
13,938 |
|
0.25 |
|
| Commercial Platform: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Multi-family mortgage |
|
337 |
|
0.01 |
|
|
1,172 |
|
0.02 |
|
|
2,133 |
|
0.04 |
|
| Commercial real estate |
|
12,950 |
|
0.24 |
|
|
6,557 |
|
0.10 |
|
|
1,581 |
|
0.02 |
|
| Franchise loans |
|
72,330 |
|
1.35 |
|
|
6,185 |
|
0.10 |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
Asset-based loans, factoring loans and
commercial leases |
|
6,565 |
|
0.12 |
|
|
1,639 |
|
0.02 |
|
|
368 |
|
0.01 |
|
| Business loans |
|
307 |
|
0.01 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
0.02 |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total Commercial
Platform |
|
92,489 |
|
1.73 |
|
|
16,553 |
|
0.26 |
|
|
4,082 |
|
0.07 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
$101,713 |
|
1.90 |
% |
|
$25,939 |
|
0.40 |
% |
|
$18,020 |
|
0.32 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table illustrates, by platform, loans and leases delinquent 60 days or more as a percentage of gross loans
and leases:
| |
|
Loans and Leases Delinquent 60 Days or More
as a Percentage of Gross Loans and Leases
|
| |
|
At December 31,
2000
|
|
At December 31,
1999
|
|
At December 31,
1998
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Retail Platform |
|
$15,139 |
|
0.48 |
% |
|
$16,747 |
|
0.38 |
% |
|
$18,430 |
|
0.44 |
% |
| Commercial Platform |
|
69,697 |
|
2.22 |
|
|
11,668 |
|
0.27 |
|
|
3,572 |
|
0.08 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
$84,836 |
|
2.70 |
% |
|
$28,415 |
|
0.65 |
% |
|
$22,002 |
|
0.52 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Losses on Loans and Leases
Credit risk is defined as the possibility of sustaining a loss because other parties to the financial instrument fail to
perform in accordance with the terms of the contract. While we follow underwriting and credit monitoring procedures which we believe are appropriate in both growing and managing the loan and lease portfolio, in the event of nonperformance by these
other parties, our potential exposure to credit losses could significantly affect our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Lending money involves an inherent risk of nonpayment. Management seeks to reduce such credit risk by administering
lending policies and underwriting procedures combined with its monitoring of the loan and lease portfolio. The allowance for losses on loans and leases represents management’s estimate of probable inherent losses which have occurred as of the
date of the financial statements. The process of determining the necessary levels of allowances for loan and lease losses is subjective and requires considerable judgement. In accordance with applicable guidelines, this process results in an
allowance for losses on loans and leases that consists of three components as described below:
|
1. Reserves for loans and leases that have
been individually evaluated and identified as loans or leases which have probable losses. These loans and leases are generally larger-balance commercial or income producing real estate loans or leases which are evaluated
on an individual basis. Reserves for these
loans and leases are attributable to specific weaknesses in these loans or leases evidenced by factors such as a deterioration in the borrower’s ability to meet its obligations, a deterioration in the quantity or quality of the collateral
securing the loan or lease, payment delinquency, or other events of default under the terms of the loan or lease agreement or promissory note.
|
|
2. Reserves for groups of smaller-balance
homogenous loans and leases that are collectively evaluated for impairment and for groups of performing larger-balance loans and leases which currently exhibit no identifiable weaknesses. The smaller-balance homogenous
loans and leases generally consist of single-family mortgage loans and consumer loans, including auto loans, home equity loans and lines of credit and unsecured personal loans. The larger-balance loans and leases generally consist of commercial or
income producing real estate loans and leases. These loans and leases have specific characteristics which indicate that it is probable that a loss has been incurred in a group of loans or leases with those similar characteristics. Reserves for these
groups of loans and leases are determined based on a combination of factors including historical loss experience, asset concentrations, levels and trends of classified assets, and loan and lease delinquencies. Reserves for these groups of loans and
leases also include an additional reserve for certain products we have introduced more recently, such as high loan-to-value home equity loans and franchise loans and leases, where we do not have extensive historical data, other than industry
experience, upon which to base our reserve levels. This additional reserve is intended to provide for those situations where our experience may be different from industry experience.
|
|
3. Unallocated Reserves.
Management determines the unallocated portion of the allowance for losses on loans and leases based on factors that are not necessarily associated with a specific credit, group of loans or leases or loan or lease category. These
factors include, but are not limited to, management’s evaluation of economic conditions in regions where we lend money, loan and lease concentrations, lending policies or underwriting procedures, and trends in delinquencies and nonperforming
assets. The unallocated portion of the allowance for losses on loans and leases reflects management’s efforts to ensure that the overall allowance appropriately reflects the probable losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio.
|
The allowance for losses on loans and leases at December 31, 2000 was $73.7 million as compared with $52.2 million at
December 31, 1999 and $45.4 million at December 31, 1998. The increase in the allowance for losses on loans and leases at December 31, 2000, as compared with December 31, 1999, was primarily related to higher provision levels associated with the
franchise loan sector partially offset by reserve reductions related to transfers of loans to held-for-sale. These higher provision levels resulted in an increase in the allowance for losses on loans and leases to 2.63% of gross loans and leases
held-for-investment at December 31, 2000 as compared with 1.22% at December 31, 1999. The increase in the allowance for losses on loans and leases at December 31, 1999, as compared with December 31, 1998, was largely due to reserves acquired in
connection with the acquisition of FMAC, partially offset by reserve reductions related to transfers of loans to held-for-sale. The allowance for losses on loans and leases is maintained at a level that we believe is appropriate based on our
estimate of probable losses in the portfolio of loans and leases held-for-investment. This assessment is based on many factors including prevailing economic conditions, identified losses within the portfolio, historical loss experience, asset
concentrations, levels and trends in classified assets, loan and lease delinquencies, and industry data.
The following table illustrates the allowance for losses on loans and leases as a percentage of nonperforming assets and
gross loans and leases, excluding loans and leases held-for-sale:
| |
|
Allowance for Losses on Loans and
Leases as a Percentage of Specified Assets
|
| |
|
At December 31, 2000
|
|
At December 31, 1999
|
|
At December 31, 1998
|
| |
|
Assets
|
|
Percent
|
|
Assets
|
|
Percent
|
|
Assets
|
|
Percent
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Nonperforming assets |
|
$ 101,713 |
|
72 |
% |
|
$ 25,939 |
|
201 |
% |
|
$ 18,020 |
|
252 |
% |
Gross loans and leases, excluding
loans and leases held-for-sale |
|
$2,802,654 |
|
2.63 |
% |
|
$4,288,003 |
|
1.22 |
% |
|
$4,191,465 |
|
1.08 |
% |
The following table illustrates the allowance for losses on loans and leases for the years indicated:
| |
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
|
1997
|
|
1996
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Beginning balance |
|
$ 52,161 |
|
|
$ 45,405 |
|
|
$ 38,458 |
|
|
$29,013 |
|
|
$30,014 |
|
| Reserves related to acquisitions(1) |
|
— |
|
|
8,256 |
|
|
11,374 |
|
|
14,162 |
|
|
2,860 |
|
| Transfers of loans to held-for-sale |
|
(15,210 |
) |
|
(2,656 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
| Charge-offs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Mortgage |
|
(422 |
) |
|
(827 |
) |
|
(2,480 |
) |
|
(2,699 |
) |
|
(6,401 |
) |
| Home Equity |
|
(18,014 |
) |
|
(19,568 |
) |
|
(7,152 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
| Auto |
|
(2,953 |
) |
|
(7,674 |
) |
|
(8,604 |
) |
|
(4,057 |
) |
|
— |
|
Asset-based loans, factoring loans
and commercial leases |
|
(4,425 |
) |
|
(3,176 |
) |
|
(828 |
) |
|
(1,658 |
) |
|
— |
|
| Franchise |
|
(1,128 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
| Business(2) |
|
(7,926 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
(34,868 |
) |
|
(31,245 |
) |
|
(19,064 |
) |
|
(8,441 |
) |
|
(6,401 |
) |
| Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Mortgage |
|
218 |
|
|
607 |
|
|
2,290 |
|
|
706 |
|
|
642 |
|
| Home Equity |
|
3,157 |
|
|
1,530 |
|
|
456 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
| Auto |
|
1,488 |
|
|
1,722 |
|
|
2,599 |
|
|
955 |
|
|
— |
|
Asset-based loans, factoring loans
and commercial leases |
|
1,366 |
|
|
231 |
|
|
178 |
|
|
111 |
|
|
— |
|
| Franchise |
|
2,826 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
9,055 |
|
|
4,090 |
|
|
5,523 |
|
|
1,772 |
|
|
642 |
|
| Net charge-offs |
|
(25,813 |
) |
|
(27,155 |
) |
|
(13,541 |
) |
|
(6,669 |
) |
|
(5,579 |
) |
| Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
62,600 |
|
|
28,311 |
|
|
9,114 |
|
|
1,952 |
|
|
1,898 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Ending balance |
|
$ 73,738 |
|
|
$ 52,161 |
|
|
$ 45,405 |
|
|
$38,458 |
|
|
$29,013 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs to average
total
loans and leases |
|
0.65 |
% |
|
0.61 |
% |
|
0.32 |
% |
|
0.28 |
% |
|
0.24 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
We acquired Bay View Credit in June 1996, Bay View Commercial Finance Group in March 1997, Ultra Funding in October 1997,
America First Eureka Holdings in January 1998 and Franchise Mortgage Acceptance Company in November 1999.
|
(2)
|
Includes $7.9 million in FMAC-originated funeral home loans.
|
Deposits
As a primary part of our business, we generate deposits for the purpose of funding loans, leases and securities. The
following table illustrates deposits as of the dates indicated:
| |
|
At December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
| |
|
Amount
|
|
Rates
|
|
Amount
|
|
Rates
|
|
Amount
|
|
Rates
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Transaction accounts |
|
$1,608,499 |
|
3.54 |
% |
|
$1,703,123 |
|
3.26 |
% |
|
$1,627,275 |
|
3.15 |
% |
| Retail certificates of deposit |
|
1,872,562 |
|
6.04 |
|
|
1,637,127 |
|
4.92 |
|
|
1,642,362 |
|
5.20 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total retail deposits |
|
3,481,061 |
|
4.89 |
|
|
3,340,250 |
|
4.07 |
|
|
3,269,637 |
|
4.20 |
|
| Brokered certificates of deposit |
|
265,251 |
|
7.16 |
|
|
389,530 |
|
6.18 |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
$3,746,312 |
|
5.05 |
% |
|
$3,729,780 |
|
4.30 |
% |
|
$3,269,637 |
|
4.20 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction accounts as a
percentage of retail deposits |
|
|
|
46.2 |
% |
|
|
|
51.0 |
% |
|
|
|
49.8 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in total deposits at December 31, 2000, as compared with December 31, 1999, was due primarily to the
growth of our retail certificates of deposit partially offset by a decrease in transaction accounts and brokered certificates of deposit. Our retail deposits grew $140.8 million during the year primarily related to marketing and promotional efforts,
reflecting the continued strength of Bay View Bank’s deposit franchise. These deposits are a significantly lower-cost funding source relative to wholesale borrowings. The increase in total deposits at December 31, 1999, as compared with
December 31, 1998, was primarily due to the growth of our brokered certificates of deposit, which we used to help fund our growth.
We continue to focus on enhancing the value of Bay View Bank’s deposit branch franchise. We believe that our focus
on Bay View Bank’s retail deposit base, particularly transaction accounts, will enhance our results of operations by lowering our consolidated cost of funds, increasing fee income and expanding opportunities for cross-selling products and
services.
Retail certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more, by time remaining until maturity, were as follows:
| |
|
At December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Three months or less |
|
$208,916 |
|
$ 96,916 |
| Over three through six months |
|
167,487 |
|
151,179 |
| Over six through twelve months |
|
155,087 |
|
130,930 |
| Over twelve months |
|
18,432 |
|
44,961 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
$549,922 |
|
$423,986 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Borrowings
In addition to deposits, we utilize collateralized advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco and other
borrowings, such as senior and subordinated debt, capital securities, warehouse lines, and securities sold under agreements to repurchase, on a collateralized and noncollateralized basis, for various purposes including the funding of loans, leases
and securities as well as to support the execution of our business strategies.
During 1999, two warehouse lines with initial committed amounts totaling $600 million were secured. Both lines have
maturities of one year or less. One warehouse line of $500 million was established to provide financing for franchise loans. The other warehouse line of $100 million, which was established to fund Bankers Mutual multi-family loan production, was
terminated following the sale of substantially all of the assets and certain liabilities of Bankers Mutual during the second quarter of 2000. In October 2000, we replaced the $500 million franchise loan-related warehouse line with a $170 million
warehouse line that expires March 31, 2001. This warehouse line is used solely to finance franchise loans held at the parent company.
On August 18, 1999, Bay View Bank issued $50 million of 10% Subordinated Notes, which mature in August 2009, a portion
of which was used to partially finance the acquisition of FMAC. In December 1998, we issued $90 million in Capital Securities yielding 9.76%, which mature on December 31, 2028. A portion of the proceeds from the Capital Securities were used to
redeem our $50 million of 8.42% Senior Debentures which matured on June 1, 1999 and the remainder for general corporate purposes.
The following table illustrates outstanding borrowings as of the dates indicated:
| |
|
At December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of
San Francisco |
|
$ 804,837 |
|
$1,367,300 |
|
$1,653,300 |
| Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
103,241 |
|
17,883 |
|
25,302 |
| Warehouse lines |
|
94,134 |
|
397,538 |
|
— |
| Subordinated Notes, net |
|
149,567 |
|
149,502 |
|
99,437 |
| Senior Debentures |
|
— |
|
— |
|
50,000 |
| Other borrowings |
|
1,664 |
|
3,294 |
|
5,077 |
| Capital Securities |
|
90,000 |
|
90,000 |
|
90,000 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
$1,243,443 |
|
$2,025,517 |
|
$1,923,116 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The lower borrowing level at December 31, 2000, as compared with December 31, 1999, was primarily due to the pay-down of
the warehouse lines related to franchise loans and the pay-down of Federal Home Loan Bank advances associated with the aforementioned sales of single-family mortgage loans and other assets during 2000. These reductions were partially offset by an
increase in securities sold under agreements to repurchase used primarily to fund mortgage-backed security purchases. Additionally, in June 2000 we auctioned $180 million of Federal Home Loan Bank liabilities with below-market interest rates. The
higher borrowing level at December 31, 1999, as compared with 1998, was primarily due to the utilization of the warehouse lines offset by a lower Federal Home Loan Bank advances level. The lower Federal Home Loan Bank advances level was primarily
related to the sale of $450 million in multi-family COFI-based loans, which effectively reduced the amount of mortgage loans that can be pledged as underlying collateral for such advances, and the use of alternative funding sources.
Short-term borrowings are defined as borrowings due within one year or less. The following table illustrates our
short-term borrowings as of the dates indicated:
| |
|
At December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of
San Francisco |
|
$530,437 |
|
|
$ 722,500 |
|
|
$729,100 |
|
| Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
103,241 |
|
|
17,883 |
|
|
25,302 |
|
| Warehouse lines |
|
94,134 |
|
|
397,538 |
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
$727,812 |
|
|
$1,137,921 |
|
|
$754,402 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average interest rate of total short-term
borrowings outstanding at period end |
|
6.58 |
% |
|
6.47 |
% |
|
5.07 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table illustrates the maximum outstanding balance for each type of short-term borrowing at any month end
during 2000, 1999 and 1998, and the average balances and weighted-average interest rates on short-term borrowings for those years:
| |
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of
San Francisco |
|
$ 772,700 |
|
|
$1,900,400 |
|
|
$1,575,460 |
|
| Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
$ 448,660 |
|
|
$ 24,784 |
|
|
$ 153,148 |
|
| Warehouse lines |
|
$ 355,316 |
|
|
$ 397,538 |
|
|
$ — |
|
Average amount of total short-term borrowings
outstanding during the year |
|
$1,137,662 |
|
|
$ 858,226 |
|
|
$1,168,410 |
|
Weighted-average interest rate of total short-term
borrowings outstanding during the year |
|
6.59 |
% |
|
5.10 |
% |
|
5.54 |
% |
Liquidity
The objective of our liquidity management program is to ensure that funds are available in a timely manner to meet loan
demand and depositors’ needs, and to service other liabilities as they come due, without causing an undue amount of cost or risk, and without causing a disruption to normal operating conditions.
We regularly assess the amount and likelihood of projected funding requirements through a review of factors such as
historical deposit volatility and funding patterns, present and forecasted market and economic conditions, and existing and planned business activities. Our Asset and Liability Committee provides oversight to the liquidity management process and
recommends policy guidelines, subject to Board of Directors approval, and courses of action to address our actual and projected liquidity needs.
The ability to attract a stable, low-cost base of deposits is a significant source of liquidity. Other sources of
liquidity available to us include short-term borrowings, which consist of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco, repurchase agreements, warehouse lines and other short-term borrowing arrangements. Our liquidity requirements can
also be met through the use of our portfolio of liquid assets. Liquid assets, as defined by us, include cash and cash equivalents in excess of the minimum levels necessary to carry out normal business operations, federal funds sold, commercial
paper, and other short-term investments.
On September 6, 2000, Bay View Bank entered into an agreement with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. This
agreement states that Bay View Bank may not declare or distribute any dividends without prior approval of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
On September 29, 2000, Bay View Capital Corporation entered into an agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of San
Francisco. In addition to requiring prior approval to pay common stock dividends, the agreement requires us to obtain prior approval to disburse dividends associated with our 9.76% Capital Securities. We requested but did not receive approval to
disburse the quarterly dividend in the third and fourth quarters of 2000. Pursuant to the terms of the Capital Securities, we have deferred distributions on the debentures. During this deferral period, distributions to which holders are entitled
will continue to accrue at an annual rate of 9.76% of the liquidation amount of $25 per Capital Security, plus accumulated additional distributions at the same rate, compounded quarterly, on any unpaid distributions (to the extent permitted by law).
We fully intend to continue to seek permission to distribute the dividend at the earliest available opportunity as the interest on these unpaid dividends is one of our highest borrowing costs.
At December 31, 2000, we had liquidity levels with cash and overnight deposits in excess of $695 million, representing
approximately 20% of total retail deposits.
To assist you in analyzing our liquidity, you should review our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows at Item 8.
“Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
Capital Resources
Management seeks to maintain adequate capital to support anticipated asset growth and credit risks, and to ensure that
Bay View Capital Corporation and Bay View Bank are in compliance with all regulatory capital guidelines.
On August 18, 1999, Bay View Bank, our wholly owned subsidiary, issued $50 million in Subordinated Notes. The
Subordinated Notes, which mature in August 2009, qualify as Tier 2 capital for regulatory purposes. The proceeds from the notes were used for, among other things, the payment of dividends to us to partially fund our acquisition of FMAC and for our
general corporate purposes.
On December 21, 1998, we issued $90 million in Capital Securities through Bay View Capital I. The Capital Securities pay
quarterly cumulative cash distributions at an annual rate of 9.76% of the liquidation value of $25 per share. We used $50 million of the proceeds to repay our 8.42% Senior Debentures upon their maturity in June 1999 and the remainder for general
corporate purposes. The Capital Securities have the added benefit of qualifying as Tier 1 capital for regulatory purposes. The Capital Securities are presented as a separate line item in our consolidated balance sheet under the caption
“Guaranteed Preferred Beneficial Interest in the Company’s Junior Subordinated Debentures.” For additional related discussion, see Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Capital Securities” at Item 8.
“Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
Stockholders’ equity totaled $297.8 million at December 31, 2000 as compared with $631.2 million at December 31,
1999. Tangible stockholders’ equity, which excludes intangible assets, was $162.9 million at December 31, 2000 as compared with $302.2 million at December 31, 1999. The decreases in stockholders’ equity and tangible stockholders’
equity were due to the loss incurred in 2000 combined with dividends declared for the year. Intangible assets decreased primarily as a result of the aforementioned restructuring of FMAC and the resulting write-off of $192.6 million of FMAC-related
goodwill. We do not have any material commitments for capital expenditures at December 31, 2000.
The following table illustrates the reconciliation of our stockholders’ equity to tangible stockholders’
equity as of the dates indicated:
| |
|
At December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Stockholders’ equity |
|
$ 297,849 |
|
|
$ 631,194 |
|
| Intangible assets |
|
(134,936 |
) |
|
(329,005 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Tangible stockholders’ equity |
|
$ 162,913 |
|
|
$ 302,189 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Book value per share |
|
$ 9.14 |
|
|
$ 19.38 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Tangible book value per share |
|
$ 5.00 |
|
|
$ 9.28 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table illustrates the changes in our tangible stockholders’ equity for the periods
indicated:
| |
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Beginning tangible stockholders’ equity |
|
$ 302,189 |
|
|
$ 243,723 |
|
|
$ 144,120 |
|
| Net (loss) income |
|
(326,197 |
) |
|
28,964 |
|
|
22,719 |
|
| Equity issued in connection with acquisitions |
|
— |
|
|
237,022 |
|
|
210,000 |
|
Intangible assets generated from acquisitions accounted for
under the purchase method of accounting |
|
(22,095 |
) |
|
(199,344 |
) |
|
(115,734 |
) |
| Intangible assets generated from branch acquisitions |
|
— |
|
|
(6,154 |
) |
|
— |
|
| Write-off of intangible assets related to Bankers Mutual |
|
2,776 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
| Write-off of intangible assets related to FMAC |
|
192,622 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
| Amortization of intangible assets |
|
20,766 |
|
|
13,687 |
|
|
11,372 |
|
| Repurchase of common stock |
|
— |
|
|
(8,381 |
) |
|
(24,063 |
) |
| Exercise of stock options |
|
94 |
|
|
498 |
|
|
3,269 |
|
| Cash dividends declared |
|
(9,780 |
) |
|
(5,579 |
) |
|
(8,069 |
) |
| Other |
|
2,538 |
|
|
(2,247 |
) |
|
109 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Ending tangible stockholders’ equity |
|
$ 162,913 |
|
|
$ 302,189 |
|
|
$ 243,723 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets generated from our acquisitions accounted for under the purchase method of accounting are deducted
from stockholders’ equity in the above calculation to arrive at tangible stockholders’ equity. Conversely, the amortization of intangible assets increases tangible stockholders’ equity as well as Bay View Capital Corporation’s
and Bay View Bank’s Tier 1 regulatory capital.
Bay View Bank is subject to various regulatory capital guidelines administered by the Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency. Under these capital guidelines, the minimum total risk-based capital ratio and Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio requirements are 8.00% and 4.00%, respectively, of risk-weighted assets and certain off-balance sheet items. The minimum Tier 1
leverage ratio requirement is 4.00% of quarterly average assets, as adjusted.
Additionally, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 defines five capital tiers:
well-capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, and critically undercapitalized, depending upon the capital level of the institution. Each federal banking agency, including the Office of the Comptroller of
the Currency, is required to implement prompt corrective actions for “undercapitalized” institutions that it regulates.
Bay View Bank’s regulatory capital levels at December 31, 2000 and 1999 exceeded the minimum requirements to be
considered adequately capitalized as illustrated in the following table:
| |
|
At December 31, 2000
|
|
At December 31, 1999
|
| |
|
Actual
|
|
Minimum
Requirement
|
|
Actual
|
|
Minimum
Requirement
|
| |
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Tier 1 leverage |
|
$218,736 |
|
4.23% |
|
$206,835 |
|
4.00% |
|
$406,001 |
|
6.87% |
|
$236,337 |
|
4.00% |
| Tier 1 risk-based |
|
$218,736 |
|
6.30% |
|
$138,875 |
|
4.00% |
|
$406,001 |
|
8.41% |
|
$193,024 |
|
4.00% |
| Total risk-based |
|
$312,582 |
|
9.00% |
|
$277,751 |
|
8.00% |
|
$507,516 |
|
10.52% |
|
$386,048 |
|
8.00% |
Similarly, Bay View Capital Corporation is subject to various regulatory capital guidelines administered by the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve. The capital guidelines provide definitions of regulatory capital ratios and the methods of calculating capital and each ratio for bank holding companies. The federal banking agencies require a minimum ratio of
qualifying total risk-based capital to risk-adjusted assets of 8% and a
minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-adjusted assets of 4%. In addition to the risk-based guidelines, federal banking regulators require banking organizations to maintain a minimum amount of Tier 1 capital to total average assets, referred to as
the leverage ratio. For a banking organization rated in the highest of the five categories used by regulators to rate banking organizations, the minimum leverage ratio of Tier 1 capital to total average assets is 3%. For organizations not rated in
the highest of the five categories, the regulations advise an additional “cushion” of at least 100 basis points. In addition to these uniform risk-based capital guidelines and leverage ratios that apply across the industry, the regulators
have the discretion to set individual minimum capital requirements for specific institutions at rates significantly above the minimum guidelines and ratios.
At December 31, 2000, Bay View Capital Corporation exceeded the minimum requirements for total and Tier 1 risk-based
capital while the Tier 1 leverage ratio was 3.47%. We exceeded the minimum capital requirements to be considered adequately capitalized at December 31, 1999 as illustrated in the following table:
| |
|
At December 31, 2000
|
|
At December 31, 1999
|
| |
|
Actual
|
|
Minimum
Requirement
|
|
Actual
|
|
Minimum
Requirement
|
| |
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Tier 1 leverage |
|
$190,686 |
|
3.47% |
|
$219,886 |
|
4.00% |
|
$386,110 |
|
6.51% |
|
$237,247 |
|
4.00% |
| Tier 1 risk-based |
|
$190,686 |
|
4.59% |
|
$166,284 |
|
4.00% |
|
$386,110 |
|
7.17% |
|
$215,475 |
|
4.00% |
| Total risk-based |
|
$338,374 |
|
8.14% |
|
$332,568 |
|
8.00% |
|
$587,773 |
|
10.91% |
|
$430,950 |
|
8.00% |
Although we did not meet the minimum Tier 1 leverage capital requirement at December 31, 2000, we have filed a capital
plan pursuant to the terms of our regulatory agreements with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco indicating that we will meet the required minimum capital ratios by March 31, 2001 and maintain appropriate capital levels thereafter (See Item 1.
“Business” and Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Regulatory Matters” at Item 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for further discussion on regulatory capital requirements).
Stock Repurchase Program
Our outstanding shares of common stock were 32,574,987 at December 31, 2000 and 32,562,942 at December 31, 1999. The
weighted-average shares outstanding (including potential dilutive common shares) used for computing earnings per diluted share increased to 32.6 million shares for the year ended December 31, 2000 as compared with 21.3 million shares for the year
ended December 31, 1999 and 20.3 million for the year ended December 31, 1998.
In August 1998, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $50 million in shares of our common stock.
During 1999, we repurchased 460,000 shares of our common stock for $8.3 million at an average price of $18.22 per share. We did not repurchase any shares of our common stock during 2000. In November 1999, all of our treasury shares were reissued in
conjunction with the acquisition of FMAC. At December 31, 2000, we had approximately $17.6 million in remaining authorization available for future share repurchases. Pursuant to our agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, we must
obtain prior written approval before repurchasing shares.
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
Our consolidated financial statements presented herein have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, which generally require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars, without considering changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time. Due to the fact that most
assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature, interest rates have a more significant impact on a financial institution’s performance than do general levels of inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the
same direction or magnitude as the prices of goods and services.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Asset/Liability Management
The objective of our asset and liability management activities is to improve our earnings by adjusting the type and mix
of assets and liabilities to effectively address changing conditions and risks. Through overall management of our balance sheet and by controlling various risks, we seek to optimize our financial returns within safe and sound parameters. Our
operating strategies for attaining this objective include managing net interest margin through appropriate risk/return pricing of assets and liabilities and emphasizing growth in retail deposits, as a percentage of interest-bearing liabilities, to
reduce our cost of funds. Our strategy includes originating and purchasing quality assets with higher risk-adjusted yields and selling assets with lower risk-adjusted yields or repricing characteristics that do not meet our objectives for interest
rate risk. We also seek to improve earnings by controlling noninterest expense, enhancing noninterest income and utilizing improved information systems to facilitate our analysis of the profitability of our business platforms. We also use risk
management instruments to modify interest rate characteristics of certain assets or liabilities to hedge against our exposure to interest rate fluctuations, reducing the effects these fluctuations might have on associated cash flows or values.
During 2000, 1999 and 1998, these risk management instruments, also referred to as derivative instruments, included interest rate exchange agreements, or “swaps”, Treasury futures contracts, forward sales contracts, and interest rate
option contracts, commonly referred to as “caps”. Derivative financial instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk. Credit risk is defined as the possibility of sustaining a loss because other parties to the financial
instrument fail to perform in accordance with the terms of the contract. Finally, we perform internal analyses to measure, evaluate and monitor risk.
Interest Rate Risk
A key objective of asset and liability management is to manage interest rate risk associated with changing asset and
liability cash flows and values and market interest rate movements. Interest rate risk occurs when interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities do not reprice simultaneously and in equal volumes. Our Asset and Liability Committee provides
oversight to our interest rate risk management process and recommends policy guidelines regarding exposure to interest rates for approval by our Board of Directors. Adherence to these policies is monitored on an ongoing basis, and decisions related
to the management of interest rate exposure are made when appropriate in accordance with our policies.
Financial institutions are subject to interest rate risk to the degree that interest-bearing liabilities reprice or
mature on a different basis and at different times than interest-earning assets. Our strategy has been to reduce the sensitivity of our earnings to interest rate fluctuations by more closely matching the effective maturities or repricing
characteristics of our assets and liabilities. Certain assets and liabilities, however, may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. Further, interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate prior to
changes in market interest rates, while rates on other types may lag behind. Additionally, certain assets, such as adjustable rate mortgages, have features, including payment and rate caps, which restrict changes in their interest rates. We consider
the anticipated effects of these factors when implementing our interest rate risk management objectives.
Swaps
We use interest rate exchange agreements, or swaps, to offset mismatches in the rate and maturity of certain of our
assets and their funding sources and to mitigate the risk of the effects of interest rate fluctuations on the value of our fixed-rate loans classified as held-for-sale. Interest rate swaps involve the exchange of fixed-rate and variable-rate
interest payment obligations without the exchange of the underlying notional amounts. We were a party to interest rate swaps with notional principal amounts of $194.0 million at December 31, 2000 and $256.5 million at December 31, 1999. All of our
swaps are common “fixed-for-floating” swaps. A portion of our swaps offset variable-rate funding while other swaps offset the change in fair value of a portion of our fixed-rate franchise loans.
Treasury Futures Contracts
We had open positions related to United States Treasury futures contracts with notional amounts of $154.7 million at
December 31, 2000 and $32.5 million at December 31, 1999. These contracts are used to offset fixed-rate franchise loans classified as held-for-sale.
Forward Sale Contracts
We had an open forward contract position with a notional amount of $70.0 million related to a Fannie Mae benchmark note
at December 31, 2000. This contract is used to offset fixed-rate franchise loans classified as held-for-sale. There were no forward sale contracts in effect at December 31, 1999.
Caps
Interest rate caps are option contracts that limit the cap holder’s risk associated with an increase in interest
rates. If rates go above a specified interest rate (strike price or cap rate), the cap holder is entitled to receive cash payments equal to the excess of the market rate over the strike price multiplied by the notional amount. We use interest rate
caps, for which we pay a premium, to protect against rising interest rates on our debt, utilized to fund our recent purchase of GNMA securities, while retaining the ability to benefit from a decline in rates. As of December 31, 2000, we had interest
rate caps with notional amounts totaling $180 million and cap rates at 7.00% and a cap index based on either the one-or three-month LIBOR rate. There were no interest rate cap contracts in effect at December 31, 1999.
Forward Sales of Mortgage-Backed Securities
In the past, we have utilized forward sales contracts of mortgage-backed securities to hedge portfolios of mortgage
loans because of their historical effectiveness as a hedge. In connection with the market and interest rate volatility experienced during the third quarter of 1998, the correlation between our outstanding forward sale contracts and the underlying
portfolio of loans was disrupted, triggering the settlement of the forward sale contracts and resulting in a $940,000 recognized loss for the year ended December 31, 1998.
Interest rate risk is the most significant market risk impacting us; however, other types of market risk also affect us
in the normal course of our business activities. The impact on us resulting from other market risks is deemed immaterial and no separate disclosure of quantitative information related to such market risks is deemed necessary. We do not maintain a
portfolio of trading securities and do not intend to engage in such activities in the foreseeable future.
Adoption of Statement No. 133
On October 1, 2000, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities. The standard required us to recognize all derivative instruments on the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting treatment for subsequent changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments depends on the
use of the derivative. The adoption of this standard resulted in an after-tax charge to operations of approximately $1.2 million. The adoption also established new assets and liabilities on the balance sheet representing the fair value of our
derivative instruments. Effective with the adoption of Statement No. 133, the derivative instruments above are not treated as hedge instruments and are being carried at fair value, with changes in such fair value charged or credited to
earnings.
Interest Rate Sensitivity
Our monitoring activities related to managing interest rate risk include both interest rate sensitivity “gap”
analysis and the use of a simulation model. While traditional gap analysis provides a simple picture of the interest rate risk embedded in the balance sheet, it provides only a static view of interest rate sensitivity at a specific point in time and
does not measure the potential volatility in forecasted results relating to changes in market interest rates over time. Accordingly, we combine the use of gap analysis with the use of a simulation model which provides a dynamic assessment of
interest rate sensitivity.
The interest rate sensitivity gap is defined as the difference between the amount of interest-earning assets anticipated
to reprice within a specific time period and the amount of interest-bearing liabilities anticipated to reprice within that same time period. A gap is considered positive when the amount of interest rate sensitive assets repricing within a specific
time period exceeds the amount of interest-bearing liabilities repricing within that same time period. Positive cumulative gaps suggest that earnings will increase when interest rates rise. Negative cumulative gaps suggest that earnings will
increase when interest rates fall.
The following table illustrates our combined asset and liability repricing as of December 31, 2000:
| |
|
Repricing Period
|
| |
|
Under
One Year
|
|
Over
One to Three
Years
|
|
Over
Three to Five
Years
|
|
Over
Five
Years
|
|
Total
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Assets |
|
|
|
| Cash and investments |
|
$ 92,666 |
|
|
$ — |
|
|
$ — |
|
|
$ — |
|
|
$ 92,666 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities and loans and
leases(1) |
|
2,913,523 |
|
|
667,093 |
|
|
277,730 |
|
|
450,261 |
|
|
4,308,607 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total interest rate sensitive assets |
|
$3,006,189 |
|
|
$ 667,093 |
|
|
$ 277,730 |
|
|
$ 450,261 |
|
|
$4,401,273 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Liabilities |
|
|
|
| Deposits: |
|
|
|
| Transaction accounts(2) |
|
$1,136,189 |
|
|
$ 430,310 |
|
|
$ 42,000 |
|
|
$ — |
|
|
$1,608,499 |
|
| Retail certificates of deposit |
|
1,787,192 |
|
|
82,400 |
|
|
2,215 |
|
|
755 |
|
|
1,872,562 |
|
| Brokered certificates of deposit |
|
265,251 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
265,251 |
|
| Borrowings(3) |
|
727,812 |
|
|
223,363 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
242,268 |
|
|
1,243,443 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total interest rate sensitive liabilities |
|
$3,916,444 |
|
|
$ 736,073 |
|
|
$ 94,215 |
|
|
$ 243,023 |
|
|
$4,989,755 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repricing gap-positive (negative) before
impact of derivatives |
|
$ (910,255 |
) |
|
$ (68,980 |
) |
|
$ 183,515 |
|
|
$ 207,238 |
|
|
$ (588,482 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Impact of derivatives |
|
140,000 |
|
|
(25,000 |
) |
|
(25,000 |
) |
|
(90,000 |
) |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
$ (770,255 |
) |
|
$ (93,980 |
) |
|
$ 158,515 |
|
|
$ 117,238 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative repricing gap-positive
(negative) |
|
$ (770,255 |
) |
|
$(864,235 |
) |
|
$(705,720 |
) |
|
$(588,482 |
) |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Based on assumed annual prepayment and amortization rates which approximate our historical experience.
|
(2)
|
We estimate transaction accounts repricing based on historical trends and the nature and types of our transaction
accounts.
|
(3)
|
Includes Capital Securities.
|
The simulation model discussed above also provides the Asset and Liability Committee with the ability to simulate our
net interest income. In order to measure, at December 31, 2000, the sensitivity of our forecasted net interest income to changing interest rates, both a rising and falling interest rate scenario were projected and compared to a base market interest
rate forecast derived from the current treasury yield curve. For the rising and falling interest rate scenarios, the base market interest rate forecast was increased or decreased, on an
instantaneous and sustained basis, by 100 and 200 basis points. At December 31, 2000, our net interest income exposure related to these hypothetical changes in market interest rates was within our policy guidelines as illustrated in the following
table:
| |
|
Net Interest Income
|
| |
|
-200 bp
|
|
-100 bp
|
|
+100 bp
|
|
+200 bp
|
| Projected effect: |
|
|
|
| Net interest income |
|
$166,470 |
|
|
$165,726 |
|
|
$155,985 |
|
|
$152,326 |
|
% Increase (decrease) from base net interest
income |
|
2.38 |
% |
|
1.93 |
% |
|
(4.07 |
)% |
|
(6.32 |
)% |
| Policy guideline |
|
0.00 |
% |
|
(5.00 |
)% |
|
(10.00 |
)% |
|
(15.00 |
)% |
One application of our simulation model measures the impact of market interest rate changes on the net present value of
estimated cash flows from our assets and liabilities, defined as our market value of equity. This analysis assesses the changes in market values of interest rate sensitive financial instruments that would occur in response to an instantaneous and
sustained increase or decrease in market interest rates of 100 and 200 basis points. At December 31, 2000, our market value of equity exposure related to these changes in market interest rates was within our policy guidelines as illustrated in the
following table:
| |
|
Market Value of Equity
|
| |
|
-200 bp
|
|
-100 bp
|
|
+100 bp
|
|
+200 bp
|
| Projected effect: |
|
|
|
| Market value of equity |
|
$490,404 |
|
|
$471,567 |
|
|
$394,461 |
|
|
$348,625 |
|
| Change in MVE as a percentage of base MVE |
|
14.93 |
% |
|
10.51 |
% |
|
(7.56 |
)% |
|
(18.30 |
)% |
| Policy guideline |
|
10.00 |
% |
|
5.00 |
% |
|
(10.00 |
)% |
|
(20.00 |
)% |
The computation of prospective effects of hypothetical interest rate changes are based on numerous assumptions,
including relative levels of market interest rates, asset prepayments and deposit decay, and should not be relied upon as indicative of actual results. Further, the computations do not contemplate any actions we may undertake in response to changes
in interest rates. Actual amounts may differ from those projections set forth above should market conditions vary from the underlying assumptions used.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
| |
|
At December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Assets |
| Cash and cash equivalents: |
| Cash and due from depository institutions |
|
$ 694,934 |
|
|
$ 155,600 |
|
| Short-term investments |
|
— |
|
|
188,305 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
694,934 |
|
|
343,905 |
|
| Securities available-for-sale: |
| Investment securities |
|
33,009 |
|
|
49,063 |
|
| Mortgage-backed securities |
|
578 |
|
|
10,479 |
|
| Securities held-to-maturity: |
| Investment securities |
|
— |
|
|
9,997 |
|
| Mortgage-backed securities |
|
535,478 |
|
|
608,668 |
|
| Mortgage-backed securities due from creditor |
|
106,572 |
|
|
35,566 |
|
| Loans and leases held-for-sale |
|
345,207 |
|
|
66,247 |
|
| Loans and leases held-for-investment, net |
|
2,751,794 |
|
|
4,295,246 |
|
| Investment in operating leased assets, net |
|
479,829 |
|
|
463,088 |
|
| Investment in stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco |
|
40,190 |
|
|
77,835 |
|
| Investment in stock of the Federal Reserve Bank |
|
19,590 |
|
|
13,476 |
|
| Real estate owned, net |
|
1,041 |
|
|
2,467 |
|
| Premises and equipment, net |
|
17,303 |
|
|
27,216 |
|
| Intangible assets |
|
134,936 |
|
|
329,005 |
|
| Other assets |
|
200,470 |
|
|
166,442 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$5,360,931 |
|
|
$6,498,700 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity |
| Deposits: |
| Transaction accounts |
|
$1,608,499 |
|
|
$1,703,123 |
|
| Retail certificates of deposit |
|
1,872,562 |
|
|
1,637,127 |
|
| Brokered certificates of deposit |
|
265,251 |
|
|
389,530 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
3,746,312 |
|
|
3,729,780 |
|
| Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco |
|
804,837 |
|
|
1,367,300 |
|
| Short-term borrowings |
|
197,375 |
|
|
415,421 |
|
| Subordinated Notes, net |
|
149,567 |
|
|
149,502 |
|
| Other borrowings |
|
1,664 |
|
|
3,294 |
|
| Other liabilities |
|
73,327 |
|
|
112,209 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
4,973,082 |
|
|
5,777,506 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guaranteed Preferred Beneficial Interest in our Junior Subordinated Debentures
(“Capital Securities”) |
|
90,000 |
|
|
90,000 |
|
| Stockholders’ equity: |
| Serial preferred stock; authorized, 7,000,000 shares; outstanding, none |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Common stock ($.01 par value); authorized, 60,000,000 shares;
issued, 2000—32,640,039 shares; 1999—32,629,056 shares;
outstanding, 2000—32,574,987 shares; 1999—32,562,942 shares |
|
326 |
|
|
326 |
|
| Additional paid-in capital |
|
456,045 |
|
|
455,964 |
|
| Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) (substantially restricted) |
|
(156,877 |
) |
|
179,100 |
|
| Treasury stock, at cost, 2000—65,052 shares; 1999—66,114 shares |
|
(1,081 |
) |
|
(1,094 |
) |
| Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss): |
| Unrealized gain (loss) on securities
available-for-sale, net of tax |
|
10 |
|
|
(293 |
) |
| Debt of Employee Stock Ownership Plan |
|
(574 |
) |
|
(2,809 |
) |
|
Total stockholders’ equity |
|
297,849 |
|
|
631,194 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity |
|
$5,360,931 |
|
|
$6,498,700 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
| |
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands, except
per share amounts) |
| Interest income: |
| Interest on loans and leases |
|
$ 360,203 |
|
|
$369,841 |
|
|
$347,086 |
|
| Interest on mortgage-backed securities |
|
60,923 |
|
|
37,376 |
|
|
48,225 |
|
| Interest and dividends on investment securities |
|
39,066 |
|
|
14,439 |
|
|
11,052 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
460,192 |
|
|
421,656 |
|
|
406,363 |
|
|
| |
| Interest expense: |
| Interest on deposits |
|
176,602 |
|
|
142,427 |
|
|
149,656 |
|
| Interest on borrowings |
|
103,282 |
|
|
95,345 |
|
|
88,000 |
|
| Interest on Senior Debentures and Subordinated Notes |
|
14,868 |
|
|
13,400 |
|
|
14,106 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
294,752 |
|
|
251,172 |
|
|
251,762 |
|
|
| |
| Net interest income |
|
165,440 |
|
|
170,484 |
|
|
154,601 |
|
| Provision for losses on loans and leases |
|
62,600 |
|
|
28,311 |
|
|
9,114 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net interest income after provision for losses on loans and leases |
|
102,840 |
|
|
142,173 |
|
|
145,487 |
|
|
| |
| Noninterest income: |
| Leasing income |
|
97,207 |
|
|
58,558 |
|
|
11,341 |
|
| Loan fees and charges |
|
8,284 |
|
|
6,283 |
|
|
5,193 |
|
| Loan servicing income |
|
5,804 |
|
|
2,550 |
|
|
2,218 |
|
| Account fees |
|
7,863 |
|
|
7,007 |
|
|
6,122 |
|
| Sales commissions |
|
5,399 |
|
|
4,801 |
|
|
3,994 |
|
| Gain (loss) on sale of assets and liabilities, net |
|
(52,606 |
) |
|
10,058 |
|
|
1,060 |
|
| Other, net |
|
4,691 |
|
|
2,275 |
|
|
1,144 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
76,642 |
|
|
91,532 |
|
|
31,072 |
|
|
| |
| Noninterest expense: |
| General and administrative: |
| Compensation and employee benefits |
|
74,856 |
|
|
61,068 |
|
|
56,105 |
|
| Occupancy and equipment |
|
23,301 |
|
|
22,101 |
|
|
20,644 |
|
| Professional services |
|
12,570 |
|
|
5,963 |
|
|
9,382 |
|
| Marketing |
|
3,743 |
|
|
3,694 |
|
|
3,572 |
|
| Data processing |
|
4,281 |
|
|
3,438 |
|
|
3,994 |
|
| Deposit insurance premiums and regulatory
fees |
|
1,612 |
|
|
2,740 |
|
|
2,908 |
|
| Postage, telephone & travel |
|
9,527 |
|
|
7,783 |
|
|
7,034 |
|
| Other, net |
|
6,828 |
|
|
5,811 |
|
|
9,928 |
|
| General and administrative—FMAC loan
production |
|
15,561 |
|
|
2,395 |
|
|
— |
|
| General and administrative—Bankers
Mutual |
|
6,311 |
|
|
2,123 |
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
158,590 |
|
|
117,116 |
|
|
113,567 |
|
|
| |
| Other noninterest expense: |
| Restructuring expenses—FMAC |
|
9,213 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
| Revaluation of FMAC-related assets |
|
101,894 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
| Leasing expenses |
|
69,350 |
|
|
40,188 |
|
|
7,682 |
|
| Dividend expense on Capital Securities |
|
8,989 |
|
|
8,935 |
|
|
244 |
|
| Real estate owned operations, net |
|
65 |
|
|
(238 |
) |
|
(240 |
) |
| Amortization of intangible assets |
|
11,158 |
|
|
11,993 |
|
|
11,372 |
|
| Amortization of intangible
assets—FMAC |
|
9,608 |
|
|
1,694 |
|
|
— |
|
| Write-off of intangible
assets—FMAC |
|
192,622 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
561,489 |
|
|
179,688 |
|
|
132,625 |
|
|
| |
| Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit) |
|
(382,007 |
) |
|
54,017 |
|
|
43,934 |
|
| Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
(55,810 |
) |
|
25,053 |
|
|
21,215 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net income (loss) |
|
$(326,197 |
) |
|
$ 28,964 |
|
|
$ 22,719 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Basic earnings (loss) per share |
|
$(10.00 |
) |
|
$ 1.37 |
|
|
$ 1.13 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
|
$(10.00 |
) |
|
$ 1.36 |
|
|
$ 1.12 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Weighted-average basic shares outstanding |
|
32,634 |
|
|
21,169 |
|
|
20,035 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding |
|
32,634 |
|
|
21,315 |
|
|
20,335 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net income (loss) |
|
$(326,197 |
) |
|
$ 28,964 |
|
|
$ 22,719 |
|
| Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: |
Change in unrealized gain or loss on securities available-for-sale, net of tax expense (benefit) of
$214, ($64) and ($92) for 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively |
|
303 |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
(130 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$(325,894 |
) |
|
$ 28,873 |
|
|
$ 22,589 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
| |
|
Number
of
Shares
Issued
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
|
|
Retained
Earnings
(Accumulated
Deficit) (1)
|
|
Treasury
Stock
|
|
Unrealized
Gain
(Loss) on
Securities
Available-
for-Sale,
Net of Tax
|
|
Debt of
Employee
Stock
Ownership
Plan
|
|
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
|
| |
|
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts) |
| Balance at December 31, 1997 |
|
15,126 |
|
$151 |
|
$103,052 |
|
|
$ 141,065 |
|
|
($66,352 |
) |
|
($72 |
) |
|
($4,217 |
) |
|
$173,627 |
|
| Issuance of common stock (AFEH acquisition): |
| From shares held in treasury |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
65,258 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
65,258 |
|
| From authorized but unissued shares |
|
5,087 |
|
51 |
|
144,691 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
144,742 |
|
| Repurchase of common stock |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(24,063 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(24,063 |
) |
| Exercise of stock options, including tax benefits |
|
163 |
|
2 |
|
3,267 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
3,269 |
|
| Cash dividends declared ($0.40 per share) |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
(8,069 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(8,069 |
) |
| Unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale, net of tax |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
(130 |
) |
| Repayment of debt |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
458 |
|
|
458 |
|
| Net income |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
22,719 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
22,719 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Balance at December 31, 1998 |
|
20,376 |
|
204 |
|
251,010 |
|
|
155,715 |
|
|
(25,157 |
) |
|
(202 |
) |
|
(3,759 |
) |
|
377,811 |
|
| Issuance of common stock (FMAC acquisition): |
| From shares held in treasury |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
32,444 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
32,444 |
|
| From authorized but unissued shares |
|
12,212 |
|
122 |
|
204,456 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
204,578 |
|
| Repurchase of common stock |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(8,381 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(8,381 |
) |
| Exercise of stock options, including tax benefits |
|
41 |
|
— |
|
498 |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
498 |
|
| Cash dividends declared ($0.30 per share) |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
(5,579 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(5,579 |
) |
| Unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale, net of tax |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
(91 |
) |
| Repayment of debt |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
950 |
|
|
950 |
|
| Net income |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
28,964 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
28,964 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Balance at December 31, 1999 |
|
32,629 |
|
326 |
|
455,964 |
|
|
179,100 |
|
|
(1,094 |
) |
|
(293 |
) |
|
(2,809 |
) |
|
631,194 |
|
| Exercise of stock options, including tax benefits |
|
11 |
|
— |
|
94 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
94 |
|
| Distribution of restricted shares |
|
— |
|
— |
|
(13 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
13 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
| Cash dividends declared ($0.30 per share) |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
(9,780 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(9,780 |
) |
| Unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale, net of tax |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
303 |
|
|
— |
|
|
303 |
|
| Repayment of debt |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
2,235 |
|
|
2,235 |
|
| Net loss |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
(326,197 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(326,197 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Balance at December 31, 2000 |
|
32,640 |
|
$326 |
|
$456,045 |
|
|
($156,877 |
) |
|
($ 1,081 |
) |
|
$10 |
|
|
($ 574 |
) |
|
$297,849 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Substantially restricted.
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
| |
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
| Net income (loss) |
|
$ (326,197 |
) |
|
$ 28,964 |
|
|
$ 22,719 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
| Amortization of intangible assets |
|
20,766 |
|
|
13,687 |
|
|
11,372 |
|
| Write-off of intangible assets—FMAC |
|
192,622 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
| Origination of loans and leases held-for-sale |
|
(520,023 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Proceeds from securitizations and/or sales of loans and leases
held-for-sale |
|
1,459,558 |
|
|
937,457 |
|
|
— |
|
| Provision for losses on loans and leases and real estate owned |
|
62,600 |
|
|
28,347 |
|
|
9,055 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment |
|
8,617 |
|
|
7,860 |
|
|
6,780 |
|
Depreciation and amortization of investment in operating leased
assets |
|
69,350 |
|
|
35,590 |
|
|
6,612 |
|
| Amortization of premiums, net of discount accretion |
|
11,981 |
|
|
24,072 |
|
|
15,735 |
|
| Accretion of retained interests in securitizations |
|
(5,213 |
) |
|
(1,390 |
) |
|
(113 |
) |
| Revaluation of FMAC-related assets |
|
101,894 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
| Revaluation of retained interests in auto securitizations |
|
1,105 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
| Loss (gain) on sale of assets and liabilities, net |
|
52,606 |
|
|
(10,058 |
) |
|
(1,060 |
) |
| (Increase) decrease in other assets |
|
(81,424 |
) |
|
36,415 |
|
|
(6,863 |
) |
| (Decrease) increase in other liabilities |
|
(37,833 |
) |
|
9,074 |
|
|
(39,424 |
) |
| Other, net |
|
(1,051 |
) |
|
(3,705 |
) |
|
(3,426 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
1,009,358 |
|
|
1,106,313 |
|
|
21,387 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
| Acquisition of assets, net of cash and cash equivalents paid |
|
(24,294 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Acquisition of subsidiaries, net of cash and cash equivalents (paid)
received |
|
— |
|
|
(15,453 |
) |
|
82,129 |
|
| Acquisition of deposits, net of premium paid |
|
— |
|
|
110,807 |
|
|
— |
|
Proceeds from the sale of substantially all of the assets and certain
liabilities of Bankers Mutual, net of cash and cash equivalents
sold |
|
30,879 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Net (increase) decrease in loans and leases resulting from originations,
net of repayments |
|
(164,239 |
) |
|
(152,297 |
) |
|
451,171 |
|
| Purchases of loans and leases, net |
|
(27,849 |
) |
|
(1,136,658 |
) |
|
(948,132 |
) |
| Purchases of mortgage-backed securities |
|
(327,840 |
) |
|
(172,304 |
) |
|
(201,714 |
) |
| Purchases of investment securities |
|
(48,070 |
) |
|
(20,035 |
) |
|
(1,956 |
) |
| Principal payments on mortgage-backed securities |
|
99,717 |
|
|
149,494 |
|
|
284,627 |
|
| Principal payments on investment securities |
|
7,444 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
| Proceeds from sale of mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale |
|
239,965 |
|
|
— |
|
|
239,707 |
|
| Proceeds from sale of investment securities available-for-sale |
|
230,041 |
|
|
— |
|
|
2,357 |
|
Proceeds from maturities/calls of investment securities
available-for-sale |
|
45,298 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Proceeds from maturities/calls of investment securities
held-to-maturity |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
5,000 |
|
| Proceed from retained interests in securitizations |
|
6,585 |
|
|
2,569 |
|
|
911 |
|
| Proceeds from sale of real estate owned |
|
6,504 |
|
|
4,127 |
|
|
5,357 |
|
| Additions to premises and equipment |
|
(3,004 |
) |
|
(3,922 |
) |
|
(11,110 |
) |
Decrease (increase) in investment in stock of the Federal Home Loan
Bank of San Francisco |
|
37,645 |
|
|
13,043 |
|
|
(9,303 |
) |
| Increase in investment in stock of the Federal Reserve Bank |
|
(6,114 |
) |
|
(13,476 |
) |
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
$ 102,668 |
|
|
$(1,234,105 |
) |
|
$(100,956 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS—(Continued)
| |
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
| Net increase (decrease) in deposits |
|
$ 16,532 |
|
|
$ 343,182 |
|
|
$ (420,141 |
) |
Proceeds from advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of
San Francisco |
|
1,950,500 |
|
|
3,725,100 |
|
|
5,320,200 |
|
Repayment of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of
San Francisco |
|
(2,514,000 |
) |
|
(4,011,100 |
) |
|
(4,833,170 |
) |
| Proceeds from repurchase agreements |
|
2,103,116 |
|
|
268,461 |
|
|
377,813 |
|
| Repayment of repurchase agreements |
|
(2,017,758 |
) |
|
(275,880 |
) |
|
(442,645 |
) |
| Issuance of Subordinated Notes |
|
— |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
— |
|
| Maturity of Senior Debentures |
|
— |
|
|
(50,000 |
) |
|
— |
|
| Net (decrease) increase in warehouse lines outstanding |
|
(288,071 |
) |
|
234,129 |
|
|
— |
|
| Net decrease in other borrowings |
|
(1,630 |
) |
|
(1,783 |
) |
|
(11,123 |
) |
| Issuance of Capital Securities |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
90,000 |
|
| Repurchase of common stock |
|
— |
|
|
(8,381 |
) |
|
(24,063 |
) |
| Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
94 |
|
|
498 |
|
|
3,269 |
|
| Dividends paid to stockholders |
|
(9,780 |
) |
|
(7,715 |
) |
|
(7,207 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
(760,997 |
) |
|
266,511 |
|
|
52,933 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
351,029 |
|
|
138,719 |
|
|
(26,636 |
) |
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
343,905 |
|
|
205,186 |
|
|
231,822 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
$ 694,934 |
|
|
$ 343,905 |
|
|
$ 205,186 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cash paid during the year for: |
| Interest |
|
$ 293,568 |
|
|
$ 255,814 |
|
|
$ 253,528 |
|
| Income taxes |
|
$ 3,468 |
|
|
$ — |
|
|
$ 118 |
|
| Supplemental non-cash investing and financing activities: |
| Loans transferred to real estate owned |
|
$ 5,151 |
|
|
$ 3,319 |
|
|
$ 4,956 |
|
| Loans transferred from held-for-investment to held-for-sale |
|
$1,323,531 |
|
|
$ 915,146 |
|
|
$ — |
|
Loans securitized and transferred to securities held-to-
maturity |
|
$ 268,172 |
|
|
$ — |
|
|
$ — |
|
Securities transferred from held-to-maturity to available-for-
sale |
|
$ 496,324 |
|
|
$ — |
|
|
$ — |
|
| The acquisitions of assets/subsidiaries involved the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Common stock issued |
|
$ — |
|
|
$ 237,022 |
|
|
$ 210,000 |
|
| Liabilities assumed |
|
— |
|
|
238,722 |
|
|
2,103,352 |
|
Fair value of assets acquired, other than cash and cash
equivalents |
|
(15,294 |
) |
|
(291,853 |
) |
|
(2,127,646 |
) |
| Goodwill |
|
(9,000 |
) |
|
(199,344 |
) |
|
(103,577 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net cash and cash equivalents (paid) received |
|
$ (24,294 |
) |
|
$ (15,453 |
) |
|
$ 82,129 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2000
Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of Operations
Bay View Capital Corporation is a diversified bank holding company headquartered in San Mateo, California. Our principal
subsidiary is Bay View Bank, N.A. Bay View Bank operates 57 full service branches throughout the San Francisco Bay Area and loan production offices throughout the United States. Bay View Bank offers personal and business banking services and deposit
accounts through its branch network and provides multi-family and commercial real estate loans, consumer loans and leases and commercial lending throughout the United States. Bay View Securitization Corporation, FMAC 2000-A Holding Company and FMAC
Franchise Receivables Corporation were formed for the purpose of issuing asset-backed securities through a trust. Bay View Capital I was formed for the purpose of issuing Capital Securities through a trust. FMAC Insurance Services operated as an
insurance agency throughout the United States prior to February 28, 2001, when substantially all of its assets and liabilities were sold.
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Bay View Capital Corporation, a bank holding
company incorporated under the laws of the state of Delaware, and our wholly owned subsidiaries: Bay View Bank, N.A., a national bank; Bay View Securitization Corporation, a Delaware corporation; Bay View Capital I, a Delaware business trust; FMAC
Insurance Services, a Delaware corporation; FMAC 2000-A Holding Company, a California corporation; and FMAC Franchise Receivables Corporation, a California Corporation. Bay View Bank includes its wholly owned subsidiaries: Bay View Acceptance
Corporation, a Nevada corporation; Bay View Commercial Finance Group, a California corporation; Bay View Franchise Mortgage Acceptance Company, a California corporation; XBVBKRS, Inc., formerly Bankers Mutual, a California corporation; MoneyCare,
Inc., a California corporation; and Bay View Auxiliary Corporation, a California corporation. Bay View Acceptance Corporation includes its wholly owned subsidiary, LFS-BV, Inc., a Nevada corporation. Effective March 1, 1999, Bay View Capital
Corporation contributed the capital stock of Bay View Commercial Finance Group to Bay View Bank in conjunction with the March 1, 1999 conversion of Bay View Bank from a federally chartered capital stock savings bank to a national bank. Bay View
Commercial Finance Group was previously a wholly owned subsidiary of Bay View Capital Corporation. Effective June 14, 1999, Bay View Credit and Ultra Funding, Inc., previously wholly owned subsidiaries of Bay View Acceptance Corporation, were merged
into Bay View Acceptance Corporation. On June 30, 2000, substantially all of the assets and certain liabilities of Bankers Mutual were sold to Berkshire Mortgage Finance Limited Partnership. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions
have been eliminated.
Basis of Financial Presentation and Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America, sometimes referred to as GAAP, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates particularly susceptible to possible changes in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for losses on loans and leases, the carrying
values of securities available-for-sale, loans and leases held-for-sale, investment in operating leased assets and deferred tax assets. An estimate of possible changes or range of possible changes cannot be made related to these items.
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents, as reported in the consolidated statements of financial condition and statements of cash
flows, consist of highly liquid financial instruments, with maturities of 90 days or less at the time of purchase, that are readily convertible into cash and are so near their maturity that they present insignificant risk of changes in
value.
Generally, our banking depositories either pay interest on deposits or apply an imputed interest credit to deposit
balances which is used as an offset to charges for banking services rendered. We have no compensating balance arrangements or lines of credit with banks. Bay View Bank is required to maintain reserves against customer deposits by keeping balances
with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco in a noninterest-earning cash account. Cash balances for Bay View Bank required to be held in reserve at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco totaled approximately $25,000 at December 31, 2000 and
$850,000 at December 31, 1999. The average required reserve balance for Bay View Bank totaled $25,000 in 2000 and $850,000 in 1999.
Securities
Securities classified as held-to-maturity are recorded at amortized cost, adjusted for the amortization of premiums and
accretion of discounts, because we have the ability and intent to hold these securities to maturity. Securities that are held to meet investment objectives such as interest rate risk and liquidity management, but which may be sold as necessary to
implement management strategies, are classified as available-for-sale and are reported at fair value. Fair value for these securities is obtained principally from published information or quotes by registered securities brokers. Securities for which
quotes are not readily available are valued based on the present value of discounted estimated future cash flows. Retained interests and asset-backed securities related to our loan and lease securitizations are classified as securities available-for
sale. We are not aware of an active market for the purchase and sale of these retained interests and asset-backed securities at this time, and accordingly, we estimated the fair value of the retained interests by calculating the present value of the
estimated expected future cash flows to be received, using management’s best estimates of the key assumptions, including credit losses, prepayment speeds, and discount rates commensurate with the risks involved. At December 31, 2000 and 1999,
there was no impairment relating to retained interests or asset-backed securities. We do not have a trading portfolio.
Securities are identified as either available-for-sale or held-to-maturity at purchase and are accounted for
accordingly. Unrealized losses on securities held-to-maturity are realized and charged against earnings when it is determined that a decline in value which is other than temporary has occurred. Net unrealized gains and losses on securities
available-for-sale are excluded from earnings and reported, net of applicable income taxes, as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. Gains and losses on sales of securities are recorded in earnings at the time of sale and are determined
by the difference between the net sale proceeds and the amortized cost of the security, using the specific identification method.
Discounts and premiums on securities are amortized into interest income using a method approximating the effective
interest method over the estimated life of the security, adjusted for actual prepayments. Interest on securities is accrued as income only to the extent considered collectible.
Loans and Leases
Loans and leases that we originate or purchase are identified as either held-for-sale or held-for-investment and are
recorded at cost including premiums or discounts, deferred fees and costs and the allowance for losses, as applicable. Loans and leases classified as held-for-sale primarily consist of fixed-rate franchise loans. Loans and leases classified as
held-for-sale are carried at the lower of cost or market on an aggregate basis for each loan and lease type. Market value for these loans and leases is based on prices for similar loans and leases in the
secondary whole loan or securitization markets. Interest on loans and leases is accrued as income only to the extent considered collectible. Loans and leases classified as held-for-investment are carried at amortized cost and are not adjusted to the
lower of cost or market because we have the ability and the intent to hold these loans and leases to maturity. Generally, we discontinue interest accruals on loans and leases 90 days or more past due. Interest income on nonaccrual loans and leases
is recognized on a cash basis when received.
We charge fees for originating loans and leases at the time the loan or lease is granted. We recognize these origination
fees, net of certain direct costs and standard costs where applicable, as a yield adjustment over the life of the related loan or lease using the effective interest method or an approximate equivalent if not materially different. Amortization of net
deferred origination fees is discontinued on nonperforming loans and leases. When a loan or lease is sold or paid off, unamortized net deferred origination fees are included in income at that time.
Impairment of a loan occurs when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we are unable to collect
all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. We consider nonperforming loans and troubled debt restructurings as impaired loans. Nonperforming loans are defined as loans 90 days or more delinquent as to principal and
interest payments unless the principal and interest are well secured and in the process of collection. We also designate loans less than 90 days delinquent as nonperforming when the full collection of principal and/or interest is doubtful. Troubled
debt restructurings are loans which have been modified based upon interest rate concessions and/or payment concessions. Large groups of homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. We consider our single-family residential and
consumer loans, including auto and home equity loans, as homogeneous loans.
Charge-offs are recorded on impaired loans for the difference between the valuation of the loan and the recorded
investment, net of any specific reserves. In determining charge-offs for specific loans, management evaluates the creditworthiness and financial status of the borrower and also analyzes cash flows and current property appraisals. Impaired loans are
measured based upon the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or, as a practical expedient, at the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is
collateral dependent. Our impaired real estate-based loans are generally measured based on the fair value of the collateral because they are collateral dependent. We recognize interest income on impaired loans on a cash basis when
received.
Allowance for Losses on Loans and Leases
The allowance for losses on loans and leases is established through a provision charged to expense and is maintained at
a level that we believe is sufficient to cover estimated probable losses in the portfolio. In determining the level of the allowance for losses on loans and leases, we adhere to an internal asset review system and an established loss reserve
methodology. This methodology provides for three reserve components. The first component represents reserves for loans and leases that have been individually evaluated and identified as having probable losses. The second component represents
reserves for groups of loans and leases that are collectively evaluated for impairment. We determine reserves for these groups of loans and leases based on factors such as prevailing economic conditions, historical loss experience, asset
concentrations, levels and trends of classified assets, and loan and lease delinquencies. The last component is unallocated reserves, representing reserves based on factors that are not necessarily associated with a specific credit, group of loans
or leases or loan or lease category. These factors include an evaluation of economic conditions in areas where we lend money, loan and lease concentrations, lending policies or underwriting procedures, and trends in delinquencies and nonperforming
assets. The unallocated reserve reflects our efforts to ensure that the overall allowance appropriately reflects the probable losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio.
While we use currently available information to provide for losses on loans and leases, additions to the allowance for
losses on loans and leases may be necessary based on new information and/or future economic conditions.
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Loan Sales and Servicing
We record a servicing asset for the present value of any retained interest in a transferred asset representing servicing
fees net of related costs. Retained interest in excess of such servicing fees is recorded on a net present value basis and is classified as an available-for-sale security at fair value. At December 31, 2000 and 1999, there was no impairment relating
to servicing assets. Amortization of servicing assets and any related impairments are included in noninterest income and noninterest expense as the associated servicing revenue is received and expenses are incurred.
Gains or losses on the securitizations and/or sales of loans and leases are recorded in earnings at the time of the
transaction when control over the loans and leases is surrendered and consideration other than beneficial interests in the loans and leases is received.
Investment in Operating Leased Assets
We purchase autos subject to leases which are characterized as operating leases. The corresponding asset is recorded as
a fixed asset and depreciated over the lease term to its estimated residual value. This depreciation and other related expenses, including the amortization of initial direct costs which are deferred and amortized over the lease term, are classified
as noninterest expense. Lease payments received are recorded as noninterest income. Gross leased asset balances were $574.9 million at December 31, 2000 and $500.0 million at December 31, 1999. Accumulated depreciation and amortization related to
the leased assets totaled $95.1 million at December 31, 2000 and $36.9 million at December 31, 1999. At December 31, 2000, future minimum lease payments to be received by us under operating leases were $94.8 million, $82.5 million, $54.9 million,
$24.0 million, and $4.4 million for the years ending December 31, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, and 2005 respectively.
We continually review and adjust, as necessary, the estimated residual value relating to our leased assets through an
evaluation of factors such as prevailing economic conditions, historical loss experience, delinquencies and projected residual value. During June 2000 we ceased originating or purchasing auto leased assets. The estimated residual value on our leased
assets was $309.6 million at December 31, 2000 and $289.9 million at December 31, 1999.
Real Estate Owned
Real estate owned is comprised of property acquired through foreclosure and is recorded at the lower of cost (i.e., net
loan value) or fair value less estimated costs to sell, as of the date of foreclosure. The difference upon foreclosure, if any, is charged-off against the allowance for losses on loans and leases. Thereafter, a specific valuation allowance is
established and charged to noninterest expense for adverse changes in the fair value of the property. Revenues and other expenses associated with real estate owned are realized and reported as a component of noninterest expense when
incurred.
Premises and Equipment
Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization
are computed on the straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives for each of the various asset categories. These useful lives range from two to ten years.
Intangible Assets
Core deposit premiums arise from the acquisition of deposits and are amortized on a declining balance basis over the
estimated life of the deposit base acquired, generally eight to ten years. We continually evaluate the
periods of amortization to determine whether later events and circumstances warrant revised estimates. In addition, the market value of core deposit premiums is re-evaluated on an annual basis to assess if any impairment exists and to determine the
carrying value that may be included as a component of regulatory capital.
Goodwill arises from acquisitions and represents the excess of the total purchase price over the fair value of net
assets acquired. Goodwill is amortized to expense on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years. On a periodic basis, we review our goodwill for events or changes in circumstances that may indicate that the estimated undiscounted future
cash flows from these acquisitions will be less than the carrying amount of the goodwill. If it becomes probable that impairment exists, a reduction in the carrying amount is recognized.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangible assets to be held and used are reviewed for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Determination of recoverability is based on an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use of the asset and its
eventual disposition. Measurement of an impairment loss for long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangible assets that management expects to hold and use are based on the fair value of the asset. Long-lived assets and certain identifiable
intangible assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
We enter into sales of securities under agreements to repurchase which are considered financing activities. The
obligations to repurchase the securities are reflected as liabilities, and the related underlying securities for the agreements, which are pledged as collateral and held by the counterparties, are reflected as securities due from the creditor when
the creditor has the right to transfer or pledge the collateral.
Income Taxes
We file consolidated federal income tax returns in which our taxable income or loss is combined with that of our
subsidiaries. Consolidated, combined and separate company state tax returns are filed in certain states, as applicable, including California. Each subsidiary’s share of income tax expense (benefit) is based on the amount which would be payable
(receivable) if separate returns were filed.
Our income tax provisions are based upon income taxes payable for the current period as well as current period changes
in deferred income taxes. Deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences of temporary differences by applying enacted statutory income tax rates applicable to future years to differences between the financial statement carrying
amounts and the tax basis of existing assets and liabilities. The effect on deferred income taxes for a change in tax rates is recognized through the provision for income taxes during the period of enactment.
Risk Management Instruments
We use risk management instruments to modify interest rate characteristics of certain assets or liabilities to hedge
against our exposure to interest rate fluctuations, reducing the effects these fluctuations might have on associated cash flows or values. Risk management instruments, also referred to as derivative instruments, must qualify and be designated as
hedges upon their inception and must be effective throughout the hedge period in order to receive hedge accounting treatment. To qualify as hedges, among other things, risk management instruments must be linked to specific assets or liabilities or
pools of similar assets or liabilities.
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
On October 1, 2000, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, “Accounting for Derivatives
and Hedging Activities”. Statement No. 133 establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and requires that every derivative instrument (including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) be
recorded in the statement of financial condition as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value. Statement No. 133 further dictates that the accounting treatment for gains or losses from changes in the derivative instrument’s fair
value is contingent on whether the derivative instrument qualifies as a hedge under the standard. If the derivative instrument does not qualify as a hedge, the gains or losses are reported in the consolidated statement of income when they occur. If
the derivative instrument qualifies as a hedge under the standard, depending on the type of risk being hedged, the gains and losses are either reported in the consolidated statement of income, offsetting the fair value change in the hedged item, or
reported as accumulated other comprehensive income in the equity section of the consolidated statement of financial condition. The standard further requires that a company formally document, designate and assess the effectiveness of transactions
that receive hedge accounting. Upon our adoption of Statement No. 133, we incurred a $1.2 million after-tax loss.
Our free standing derivative instruments consist of interest rate exchange agreements, or “swaps”, Treasury
futures contracts, forward contracts, and interest rate option contracts, commonly referred to as “caps”. (See Note 20 for a description of the primary characteristics of these derivative instruments). Effective with the adoption of
Statement No. 133, these derivatives are not treated as hedge instruments and are being carried at fair value, with changes in such fair value charged or credited to our earnings.
Amounts payable or receivable for a portion of our interest rate swaps are accrued with the passage of time, the effect
of which is included in interest income or expense. The amounts payable or receivable associated with our Treasury futures are settled daily. If a hedged asset or liability is sold or paid off before maturity of the hedging interest rate derivative,
the derivative is closed out or settled, and any net settlement amount upon the close-out or termination of the interest rate derivative is recognized in earnings.
In connection with our use of risk management instruments, we are exposed to potential losses (credit risk) in the event
of nonperformance by the counterparties to the agreements. We manage the credit risk associated with our risk management instruments by adhering to a strict counterparty selection process and by establishing maximum exposure limits with each
individual counterparty. We do not anticipate nonperformance by our counterparties.
Stock-Based Compensation
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” establishes
financial accounting and reporting standards for stock-based compensation plans, including employee stock purchase plans, stock options and restricted stock. Statement No. 123 encourages all entities to adopt a fair value method of accounting for
stock-based compensation plans, whereby compensation cost is measured at the grant date based upon the fair value of the award and is realized as an expense over the service or vesting period. However, Statement No. 123 also allows an entity to
continue to measure compensation cost for these plans using the intrinsic value method of accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.”
We account for our stock-based awards to employees and directors using the intrinsic value method of accounting in
accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25. Under the intrinsic value method, compensation cost is generally the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the stock at the grant or other measurement date over the exercise price.
See Note 18 for a pro forma presentation of our net income and earnings per share had compensation cost related to our stock option awards been determined under the fair value method.
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share are calculated by dividing net earnings or loss for the period by the weighted-average common
shares outstanding for that period. There is no adjustment to the number of outstanding shares for potential dilutive instruments, such as stock options. Diluted earnings per share takes into account the potential dilutive impact of such instruments
and uses the average share price for the period in determining the number of incremental shares to add to the weighted-average number of shares outstanding.
The following table illustrates the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the periods
indicated:
| |
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
| |
|
(Amounts in thousands,
except per share amounts) |
| Net earnings (loss) available to common stockholders |
|
$(326,197 |
) |
|
$28,964 |
|
$22,719 |
| Weighted-average basic shares outstanding |
|
32,634 |
|
|
21,169 |
|
20,035 |
| Add: Dilutive potential common shares |
|
— |
|
|
146 |
|
300 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding |
|
32,634 |
|
|
21,315 |
|
20,335 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Basic earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ (10.00 |
) |
|
$ 1.37 |
|
$ 1.13 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ (10.00 |
) |
|
$ 1.36 |
|
$ 1.12 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2000, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140,
“Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities,” which replaces Statement No. 125. This statement, while not changing most of the guidance originally issued in Statement No. 125, revises the
standards for accounting for securitizations and other transfers and requires certain additional disclosures related to the transferred assets. Certain provisions of the statement related to the recognition, reclassification, and disclosure of
collateral, as well as the disclosure of securitization transactions, became effective as of December 31, 2000. Other provisions related to the transfer and servicing of financial assets and extinguishment of liabilities are effective for
transactions occuring after March 31, 2001. Based on current operations, we believe that the application of this statement will not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
Reclassifications
In addition to the reclassifications discussed in Principles of Consolidation above, certain other reclassifications
have been made to prior year balances in order to conform to the current year presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on the results of operations or stockholders’ equity.
Note 2. Merger and Acquisition-Related Activity
Franchise Mortgage Acceptance Company
We completed our acquisition of Franchise Mortgage Acceptance Company and its wholly owned division, Bankers Mutual,
collectively referred to as FMAC, on November 1, 1999. Under the terms of the agreement, as amended, we acquired all of the common stock of FMAC for consideration valued at approximately $285 million. Each share of FMAC common stock was exchanged
for, at the election of the holder, either $9.80 in cash or 0.5444 shares of our common stock. In total, cash elections were limited to 15% of the shares of
FMAC common stock outstanding immediately prior to closing and the elections for our common stock were limited to 85% of the shares of FMAC common stock outstanding immediately prior to closing. We paid approximately $48 million in cash, including
payments for certain acquisition costs, and issued 13,868,805 shares of our common stock, a portion of which were issued from our shares in treasury. Upon consummation of the acquisition, we contributed substantially all of FMAC’s assets and
liabilities to newly formed subsidiaries of Bay View Bank. The acquisition of FMAC was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. The amount of goodwill recorded as of the merger date, which represented the excess of the total purchase
price over the estimated fair value of net assets acquired, was approximately $199 million. This amount was associated entirely with FMAC’s lending operations, which was the core business acquired, and was initially amortized on a straight-line
basis over 15 years.
On June 30, 2000, substantially all of the assets and certain liabilities of Bankers Mutual were sold to or assumed by
Berkshire Mortgage Finance Limited Partnership for approximately $40 million in cash. On September 11, 2000, we announced the restructuring of FMAC’s franchise lending operations. The shutdown of this division was effective as of September 30,
2000 and involved the termination of all related production and marketing personnel. In connection with this restructuring, goodwill of $192.6 million was written off, representing the entire unamortized balance associated with FMAC.
The pro forma financial information in the following table illustrates the combined results of our operations and the
operations of FMAC for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998 as if the acquisition of FMAC had occurred as of January 1, 1998. The pro forma financial information is presented for informational purposes and is not necessarily indicative of the
results of operations which would have occurred if we had constituted a single entity as of January 1, 1998. The pro forma financial information is also not necessarily indicative of the future results of operations of the combined company. In
particular, our opportunity to achieve certain cost savings as a result of the acquisition has not been included in the pro forma financial information.
| |
|
For the Year
Ended
December 31,
|
| |
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands, except
per share amounts) |
| |
|
(Unaudited) |
| Net interest income |
|
$ 170,667 |
|
|
$ 157,975 |
|
| Provision for losses on loans and leases |
|
(50,406 |
) |
|
(11,758 |
) |
| Noninterest income |
|
125,748 |
|
|
81,530 |
|
| Noninterest expense |
|
(250,458 |
) |
|
(194,807 |
) |
| Income tax expense |
|
(5,252 |
) |
|
(21,059 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net (loss) income |
|
$ (9,701 |
) |
|
$ 11,881 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Basic (loss) earnings per share |
|
$ (0.28 |
) |
|
$ 0.35 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Diluted (loss) earnings per share |
|
$ (0.28 |
) |
|
$ 0.35 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The pro forma combined net loss for the year ended December 31, 1999 of $9.7 million consists of our net income of $29.0
million and a net loss for FMAC of $25.6 million, less pro forma adjustments of $13.1 million. The pro forma combined net income for the year ended December 31, 1998 of $11.9 million consists of our net income of $22.7 million and net income for
FMAC of $8.3 million, less pro forma adjustments of $19.1 million. Significant pro forma adjustments include the reduction in net interest income from a sale of a portion of Bay View Bank’s loan portfolio in contemplation of the acquisition,
the interest and other costs associated with the issuance of $50 million in Subordinated Notes by Bay View Bank to partially finance the acquisition, the
amortization expense relating to goodwill generated as a result of the acquisition, and the income tax benefit associated with the pro forma adjustments.
Goodman Factors, Inc.
On February 1, 2000, we acquired the assets and operations of Goodman Factors, Inc., a Texas-based general purpose
factoring company for a total purchase price of $24.3 million. The average balance of the factoring receivable assets acquired was approximately $17.5 million. The amount of goodwill related to this acquisition was approximately $9.0 million, which
is being amortized on a straight-line basis over 12 years. This goodwill amount represents the excess of the total purchase price over the estimated fair value of net assets acquired.
Luther Burbank Savings Branches
On July 8, 1999, we announced a definitive agreement with Luther Burbank Savings, a savings bank headquartered in Santa
Rosa, California, to acquire Luther Burbank Savings’ Mill Valley and Novato, California branches. These two branches represented approximately $117 million in deposits. In accordance with the agreement, we paid a 5.25% deposit premium. The
transaction closed on September 25, 1999 and these two branches are now operating as Bay View Bank branches. The amount of goodwill and core deposit intangibles recorded as of the acquisition date was approximately $6 million, which is being
amortized on a straight-line basis over 10 years.
America First Eureka Holdings, Inc.
We completed our acquisition of America First Eureka Holdings, Inc., sometimes referred to as AFEH, and its wholly owned
subsidiary, EurekaBank, a federal savings bank, on January 2, 1998. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, we paid $90 million in cash and $210 million in common stock (8,076,923 shares of our common stock, a portion of which were issued from our
treasury shares) to America First Financial Fund 1987—A Limited Partnership, the sole shareholder of AFEH, for a total purchase price of $300 million. The number of common shares issued was based on the average value of our common stock for the
20 full trading days ending on the fifth business day prior to the merger closing date. Based on the average value of our common stock during this period and pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the number of common shares issued was determined by
dividing $210 million by $26.00 per share.
The acquisition of AFEH was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting effective January 2, 1998. The amount
of goodwill recorded as of the merger date was $104 million, which is being amortized on a straight-line basis over 20 years and which excludes core deposit intangibles of approximately $12 million, which are being amortized on a declining balance
basis over 10 years. This goodwill amount represents the excess of the total purchase price over the estimated fair value of net assets acquired.
Concord Growth Corporation
We completed our acquisition of EXXE Data Corporation and its wholly owned commercial finance subsidiary, Concord Growth
Corporation, on March 17, 1997. At the close of the transaction, EXXE became a stand-alone subsidiary of Bay View Capital Corporation. Subsequent to the close of the transaction, EXXE was merged into Concord Growth Corporation and liquidated and
Concord Growth Corporation became a first-tier, stand-alone subsidiary of Bay View Capital Corporation. The former holders of EXXE capital stock, warrants and options received an initial aggregate cash payment of $19.8 million and were entitled to
potential future cash payments of up to $34 million, expiring in 2000, depending upon the financial performance of Concord Growth
Corporation. We accrued for cash payments of $10.0 million pursuant to this agreement in 2000 which are considered part of the initial purchase price. A cash payment of $9.0 million was made in January 2001 and a final payment of $700,000 is
anticipated during the second quarter of 2001. The balance of $300,000 will be used to discharge certain pre-acquisition legal liabilities of Concord Growth Corporation. There were no cash payments made during 1999 or 1998. The acquisition was
accounted for under the purchase method of accounting effective April 1, 1997. The total purchase price exceeded the estimated fair value of net assets acquired by approximately $22 million, which was recorded as goodwill and which is being
amortized on a straight-line basis over 15 years. During 1998, Concord Growth Corporation was renamed Bay View Commercial Finance Group. All references to this subsidiary from this point forward herein will reflect its new name. Effective March 1,
1999, Bay View Capital Corporation contributed the capital stock of Bay View Commercial Finance Group to Bay View Bank in conjunction with the March 1, 1999 conversion of Bay View Bank from a federal stock savings bank to a nationally chartered
commercial bank.
Note 3. Restructuring Charges
On September 11, 2000, we announced the restructuring of our franchise lending division, FMAC, which was acquired in
November of 1999. The restructuring of the franchise lending division was effective as of September 30, 2000. The restructuring involved the termination of approximately 146 related production and marketing personnel, of which 116 were terminated as
of September 30, 2000. Restructuring charges for the division totaled $9.2 million as of December 31, 2000, and consisted primarily of $4.1 million of severance and other involuntary termination benefits, $1.3 million of occupancy-related charges
and $3.8 million of severance and other facility and ancillary costs. Accrued restructuring liabilities at December 31, 2000 were $4.3 million.
Note 4. Regulatory Matters
During the third quarter of 2000, we entered into formal agreements with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency,
sometimes referred to as the OCC, and the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
The agreement between Bay View Bank and the OCC was dated September 6, 2000. The provisions of this agreement, among
other things, require that Bay View Bank’s Board of Directors adopt a new budget as well as new strategic, earnings and capital plans. The new strategic plan establishes objectives for Bay View Bank’s overall risk profile, earnings
performance, growth, and capital adequacy. In addition, a provision of the agreement states that Bay View Bank may not declare or distribute any dividends without the prior written approval of
the OCC.
The agreement between Bay View Capital Corporation and the Federal Reserve Bank was dated September 28, 2000. The
provisions of this agreement, among other things, also require that we adopt a new budget and new strategic, earnings and capital plans. The agreement also states that the we may not declare or pay any cash or stock dividends or make any interest
payments on our Capital Securities without the prior written approval of the Federal Reserve Bank. The agreement further requires the prior written approval of the Federal Reserve Bank to increase the principal balance of any category of debt above
the levels outstanding as of June 30, 2000. Finally, we may not repurchase any stock without the prior written approval of the Federal Reserve Bank.
At December 31, 2000, Bay View Capital Corporation exceeded the minimum requirements for Total and Tier 1 risk-based
capital while its Tier 1 leverage ratio of 3.47% fell below the minimum required amount. Accordingly, in January 2001, we filed a capital plan, pursuant to the terms of our regulatory agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco,
indicating our intention to meet the required minimum capital ratios by March 31, 2001 and maintain appropriate capital levels thereafter. This capital plan has yet to be approved by the Federal Reserve Board. At this time, the financial impact, if
any, of the regulatory actions that may result from our failure to meet the minimum capital requirements cannot be determined. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
uncertainty.
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Additionally, execution of this capital plan depends on certain future events and circumstances, the outcome of which
cannot be guaranteed. Nevertheless, management believes, at this time, that the institution will meet all the provisions of the plan and therefore achieve the plan’s regulatory capital goals. Significant aspects of the capital plan include
utilizing excess cash to pay off specific fundings, thereby reducing assets to improve the leverage ratio. In addition, the plan includes the realization of contingent gains during the first quarter of 2001 primarily related to securities sold in
December 2000.
Note 5. Investment Securities
All investment securities were classified as either available-for-sale or held-to-maturity at December 31, 2000 and
1999. We did not maintain a trading portfolio during 2000, 1999 or 1998. The following tables illustrate our investment securities as of the dates indicated:
| |
|
At December 31, 2000
|
| |
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
Gross Unrealized
|
|
Fair
Value
|
| |
|
|
Gains
|
|
(Losses)
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Available-for-sale: |
| Federal National Mortgage Association stock |
|
$ 580 |
|
$ 249 |
|
$— |
|
|
$ 829 |
| Asset-backed securities |
|
3,950 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
3,950 |
| Retained interests in securitizations |
|
28,437 |
|
— |
|
207 |
|
|
28,230 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
$32,967 |
|
$ 249 |
|
$(207 |
) |
|
$33,009 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
At December 31, 1999
|
| |
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
Gross Unrealized
|
|
Fair
Value
|
| |
|
|
Gains
|
|
(Losses)
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Available-for-sale: |
| Federal National Mortgage Association stock |
|
$ 579 |
|
$ — |
|
$ (7 |
) |
|
$ 572 |
| Asset-backed securities |
|
5,393 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
5,393 |
| Retained interests in securitizations |
|
43,098 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
43,098 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
$49,070 |
|
$ — |
|
$ (7 |
) |
|
$49,063 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Held-to-maturity: |
| Federal Home Loan Bank callable notes |
|
$ 9,997 |
|
$ — |
|
$(169 |
) |
|
$ 9,828 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following tables illustrate activity in our retained interests in loan and lease securitizations for the periods
indicated:
| |
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2000
|
| |
|
Beginning
Balance
|
|
2000
Securitizations
|
|
Cash
Received
|
|
Accretion
|
|
Realized
Gain
(Loss)
|
|
Change in
Unrealized
Gain
(Loss)
|
|
Ending
Balance
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| 1994-A |
|
$ 1,052 |
|
$ — |
|
$ (382 |
) |
|
$ 134 |
|
|
$ 7 |
|
|
$— |
|
|
$ 811 |
| 1995-A |
|
446 |
|
— |
|
(21 |
) |
|
46 |
|
|
(189 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
282 |
| 1996-A |
|
5,251 |
|
— |
|
(11 |
) |
|
657 |
|
|
(5,486 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
411 |
| 1997-A |
|
681 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
60 |
|
|
(741 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
| 1997-B |
|
626 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
28 |
|
|
(654 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
| 1997-C |
|
216 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
15 |
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
| 1997-RA-1 |
|
2,907 |
|
— |
|
(4,160 |
) |
|
177 |
|
|
1,076 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
| 1998-A |
|
534 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
19 |
|
|
(553 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
| 1998-B |
|
5,560 |
|
— |
|
(888 |
) |
|
258 |
|
|
(4,615 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
315 |
| 1998-C |
|
6,700 |
|
— |
|
(731 |
) |
|
772 |
|
|
(4,872 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
1,869 |
| 1998-D |
|
7,203 |
|
— |
|
(153 |
) |
|
1,217 |
|
|
(3,674 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
4,593 |
| 1998-1 |
|
1,809 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
(401 |
) |
|
(1,408 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
| 1999-LG-1 |
|
10,113 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
1,485 |
|
|
(2,181 |
) |
|
(207 |
) |
|
9,210 |
| 2000-A |
|
— |
|
12,452 |
|
— |
|
|
429 |
|
|
(6,768 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
6,113 |
| 2000-LJ-1 |
|
— |
|
4,341 |
|
(239 |
) |
|
524 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
4,626 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Totals |
|
$43,098 |
|
$16,793 |
|
$(6,585 |
) |
|
$5,420 |
|
|
$(30,289 |
) |
|
$(207 |
) |
|
$28,230 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 1999
|
| |
|
Beginning
Balance
|
|
FMAC
Balances
Acquired
on
11/1/99
|
|
1999
Securitizations
|
|
Cash
Received
|
|
Accretion
|
|
Ending
Balance
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| 1994-A |
|
$ — |
|
$ 1,081 |
|
$ — |
|
$ (61 |
) |
|
$ 32 |
|
$ 1,052 |
| 1995-A |
|
— |
|
474 |
|
— |
|
(42 |
) |
|
14 |
|
446 |
| 1996-A |
|
— |
|
5,098 |
|
— |
|
(1 |
) |
|
154 |
|
5,251 |
| 1997-A |
|
— |
|
661 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
20 |
|
681 |
| 1997-B |
|
— |
|
608 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
18 |
|
626 |
| 1997-C |
|
— |
|
210 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
6 |
|
216 |
| 1997-RA-1 |
|
4,641 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
(2,149 |
) |
|
415 |
|
2,907 |
| 1998-A |
|
— |
|
518 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
16 |
|
534 |
| 1998-B |
|
— |
|
5,547 |
|
— |
|
(154 |
) |
|
167 |
|
5,560 |
| 1998-C |
|
— |
|
6,652 |
|
— |
|
(162 |
) |
|
210 |
|
6,700 |
| 1998-D |
|
— |
|
6,992 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
211 |
|
7,203 |
| 1998-1 |
|
— |
|
1,757 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
52 |
|
1,809 |
| 1999-LG-1 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
10,038 |
|
— |
|
|
75 |
|
10,113 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Totals |
|
$4,641 |
|
$29,598 |
|
$10,038 |
|
$(2,569 |
) |
|
$1,390 |
|
$43,098 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following table illustrates the significant assumptions utilized in the valuation of retained interests as of the
dates indicated:
| |
|
At December 31, 2000
|
|
At December 31, 1999
|
| |
|
Auto Loans
|
|
Franchise
Loans
|
|
Auto Loans
|
|
Franchise
Loans
|
| Weighted-average discount rate |
|
14.00 |
% |
|
18.00 |
% |
|
13.90 |
% |
|
18.00 |
% |
Range of projected annual credit
losses |
|
0.90%–1.75 |
% |
|
0.00%–13.45 |
% |
|
0.85%–2.00 |
% |
|
— |
|
Range of projected cumulative credit
losses |
|
1.61%–2.46 |
% |
|
0.05%–22.59 |
% |
|
1.19%–2.71 |
% |
|
— |
|
| Prepayment speed |
|
1.6 ABS |
|
|
2.5 CPR |
|
|
1.6 ABS |
|
|
— |
|
The losses realized during the year ended December 31, 2000 on our retained interests in loan and lease securitizations
were due to other than temporary declines in the estimated values of these securities. These declines in value were primarily attributable to higher than projected credit losses resulting from a deterioration in the credit quality of the underlying
loans during the year. At December 31, 1999, the discount rate on franchise loan and lease securitizations included an inherent credit loss and prepayment assumption consistent with industry averages at that time.
Upon our adoption of Statement No. 133, we identified and transferred $256.4 million of certain asset-backed securities
generated by our on-balance sheet franchise loan securitization classified as held-for-investment to our available-for-sale portfolio. These securities were subsequently sold during December 2000.
Proceeds from sales of investment securities classified as available-for-sale were $230.0 million. Gross losses of $26.4
million were realized on these sales. There were no sales of investment securities in 1999. Proceeds from sales of investment securities classified as available-for-sale during 1998 were $2.4 million. Gross gains of $202,000 were realized on these
sales. There were no sales of investment securities classified as held-to-maturity during 2000, 1999 or 1998.
In 2000, we purchased Federal Home Loan Bank callable notes with a total par value of $35.3 million. In 1999, we
purchased a Federal Home Loan Bank callable note with a par value of $10.0 million. During 2000, all of our Federal Home Loan Bank callable notes, with a total par value of $45.3 million, were called.
We use certain qualified types of investment securities as full or partial collateral for borrowings, including advances
from the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco. There were no pledged investment securities at December 31, 2000. The par value of pledged investment securities at December 31, 1999 was $10.0 million.
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Note 6. Mortgage-backed Securities
We hold mortgage-backed securities issued by government-chartered agencies, including Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the
Government National Mortgage Association and by non-public financial intermediaries. The mortgage-backed securities portfolio also includes senior tranches of private-issue collateralized mortgage obligations. All mortgage-backed securities were
classified as either available-for-sale or held-to-maturity at December 31, 2000 and 1999. The following table illustrates our mortgage-backed securities, including securities due from creditor, as of the dates indicated:
| |
|
At December 31, 2000
|
| |
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
Gross
Gains
|
|
Unrealized
(Losses)
|
|
Fair Value
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Available-for-sale: |
|
|
| Fannie Mae |
|
$ 340 |
|
$ 1 |
|
$ — |
|
|
$ 341 |
| Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
262 |
|
— |
|
(25 |
) |
|
237 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total available-for-sale |
|
602 |
|
1 |
|
(25 |
) |
|
578 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Held-to-maturity: |
|
|
| Fannie Mae |
|
165,210 |
|
321 |
|
(2,015 |
) |
|
163,516 |
| Freddie Mac |
|
84,646 |
|
34 |
|
(1,271 |
) |
|
83,409 |
| Government National Mortgage Association |
|
377,444 |
|
10,174 |
|
(62 |
) |
|
387,556 |
| Issued by other financial intermediaries |
|
11,827 |
|
41 |
|
(65 |
) |
|
11,803 |
| Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
2,923 |
|
— |
|
(10 |
) |
|
2,913 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total held-to-maturity |
|
642,050 |
|
10,570 |
|
(3,423 |
) |
|
649,197 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
$642,652 |
|
$10,571 |
|
$ (3,448 |
) |
|
$649,775 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
At December 31, 1999
|
| |
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
Gross
Gains
|
|
Unrealized
(Losses)
|
|
Fair Value
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Available-for-sale: |
|
|
| Fannie Mae |
|
$ 517 |
|
$ — |
|
$ (13 |
) |
|
$ 504 |
| Government National Mortgage Association |
|
9,795 |
|
— |
|
(156 |
) |
|
9,639 |
| Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
336 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
336 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total available-for-sale |
|
10,648 |
|
— |
|
(169 |
) |
|
10,479 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Held-to-maturity: |
|
|
| Fannie Mae |
|
195,550 |
|
15 |
|
(5,387 |
) |
|
190,178 |
| Freddie Mac |
|
102,090 |
|
10 |
|
(2,893 |
) |
|
99,207 |
| Government National Mortgage Association |
|
174,379 |
|
8 |
|
(2,435 |
) |
|
171,952 |
| Issued by other financial intermediaries |
|
20,633 |
|
156 |
|
(44 |
) |
|
20,745 |
| Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
151,582 |
|
— |
|
(8,080 |
) |
|
143,502 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total held-to-maturity |
|
644,234 |
|
189 |
|
(18,839 |
) |
|
625,584 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
$654,882 |
|
$ 189 |
|
$(19,008 |
) |
|
$636,063 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average yields on mortgage-backed securities classified as available-for-sale and held-to-maturity at
December 31, 2000 were 6.11% and 7.45%, respectively. The weighted-average yields on mortgage-backed securities classified as available-for-sale and held-to-maturity at December 31, 1999 were 5.88% and 6.50%, respectively.
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The amount of adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities was $52.9 million at December 31, 2000 and $78.9 million at
December 31, 1999. We use mortgage-backed securities as full or partial collateral for advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco, repurchase agreements and interest rate exchange agreements. The total par value of pledged
mortgage-backed securities was $481.6 million at December 31, 2000 and $549.6 million at December 31, 1999.
Upon our adoption of Statement No. 133, during 2000 we identified and transferred $231.0 million of certain
mortgage-backed securities issued by the Government National Mortgage Association and other financial intermediaries classified as held-for-investment to our available for sale portfolio. These securities were subsequently sold during December
2000.
Proceeds from sales of mortgage-backed securities classified on available-for-sale during 2000 were $240.0 million.
Gross gains of $2.5 million and gross losses of $2.4 million were realized on these sales. There were no sales of mortgage-backed securities classified as available-for-sale during 1999. Proceeds from sales of mortgage-backed securities classified
as available-for-sale during 1998 were $239.7 million. Gross gains of $2.0 million and gross losses of $206,000 were realized on these sales. There were no sales of mortgage-backed securities classified as held-to-maturity during 2000, 1999 or
1998.
The amortized cost and fair value of mortgage-backed securities classified as available-for-sale and held-to-maturity at
December 31, 2000, categorized by remaining contractual maturity, are illustrated in the following table. Expected remaining maturities of mortgage-backed securities will generally differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the
right to prepay obligations with or without penalties.
| |
|
At December 31, 2000
|
| |
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
Fair Value
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Due in one year or less |
|
$ — |
|
$ — |
| Due after one year through five years |
|
918 |
|
942 |
| Due after five years through ten years |
|
85,699 |
|
84,603 |
| Due after ten years |
|
556,035 |
|
564,230 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
$642,652 |
|
$649,775 |
| |
|
|
|
|
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Note 7. Loans and Leases
The following table illustrates our loan and lease portfolio as of the dates indicated:
| |
|
December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Loans and leases receivable: |
| Retail platform: |
| Single-family mortgage
loans |
|
$ 383,140 |
|
|
$ 908,950 |
|
| Home equity loans and
lines of credit |
|
302,897 |
|
|
648,676 |
|
| Auto loans |
|
287,020 |
|
|
496,901 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total retail loans |
|
973,057 |
|
|
2,054,527 |
|
| Commercial platform: |
| Multi-family mortgage
loans |
|
611,484 |
|
|
622,835 |
|
| Commercial mortgage
loans |
|
339,764 |
|
|
365,712 |
|
| Franchise loans |
|
443,622 |
|
|
917,281 |
|
| Asset-based loans,
factoring loans and commercial leases |
|
353,362 |
|
|
254,671 |
|
| Business loans |
|
81,365 |
|
|
72,977 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total commercial loans and leases |
|
1,829,597 |
|
|
2,233,476 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Gross loans and leases held-for-investment |
|
2,802,654 |
|
|
4,288,003 |
|
| Premiums and discounts and deferred fees and costs, net |
|
22,878 |
|
|
59,404 |
|
| Allowance for losses on loans and leases |
|
(73,738 |
) |
|
(52,161 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Loans and leases held-for-investment, net |
|
$2,751,794 |
|
|
$4,295,246 |
|
| Loans and leases held-for-sale(1) |
|
345,207 |
|
|
66,247 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Loans and leases receivable |
|
$3,097,001 |
|
|
$4,361,493 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes loans with an unpaid principal balance of $388.3 million at December 31, 2000 and $66.2 million at December 31,
1999.
|
Our loan and lease classifications for financial reporting purposes differ from those for regulatory reporting purposes.
Loans and leases are classified for financial reporting purposes based upon the purpose and primary source of repayment of the loans or leases. Loans and leases are classified for regulatory reporting purposes based upon the type of collateral
securing the loans or leases.
During 2000, we sold $423.2 million of single-family mortgage loans, $244.0 million of high loan-to-value home equity
loans, $120.0 million of franchise loans, $58.5 million of multi-family mortgage loans, $49.1 million of auto loans, and $26.5 million of commercial equipment leases. During 1999, we sold $450.0 million of multi-family COFI-based loans, $104.8
million of single-family COFI-based loans, $79.9 million in Bankers Mutual multi-family production, and $43.2 million of home equity loans. There were no loan sales in 1998.
During 2000, we securitized and sold $356.6 million of auto loans and completed a $268.2 million on-balance sheet
franchise loan securitization that effectively transferred these loans to investment securities (see Note 5). During 1999, we securitized and sold $247 million of auto loans. In all of these securitizations, we retained servicing responsibilities
and subordinated interests. The investors and the securitization trusts have no recourse to our other assets for failure of debtors to pay when due. Our retained interests are subordinate to investor’s interests. Their value is subject to
credit, prepayment, and interest rate risks on the transferred financial
assets. In 2000, we recognized pre-tax losses of $9.1 million related to the revaluation of our retained interests in our auto loan securitizations combined with charges associated of excised of the clean up call on our 1997 auto loan
securitization. No gain or loss was recognized on the on-balance sheet securitization of franchise loans. In 1999, we recognized $5.2 million in pre-tax gains on the securitization of auto loans. There were no loan securitizations in
1998.
We serviced participating interests in single-family, multi-family, franchise, and auto loans and leases that we
securitized and/or sold of $2.9 billion at December 31, 2000 and $6.0 billion at December 31, 1999. At December 31, 2000, we had outstanding recourse and subordination contingencies relating to $37.7 million of loans and leases sold. At December 31,
1999, we had outstanding recourse and subordination contingencies relating to $2.2 billion of loans and leases securitized and/or sold, including $2.1 billion in multi-family loans sold by Bankers Mutual under Fannie Mae’s Delegated
Underwriting and Servicing program. We sold the servicing of the Bankers Mutual multi-family loans in connection with the sale of our Bankers Mutual subsidiary on June 30, 2000 (see Note 2).
The aggregate amount of servicing assets arising from loans and leases securitized and/or sold totaled $15.4 million at
December 31, 2000 and $62.1 million at December 31, 1999. Significant assumptions utilized in the December 31, 2000 valuation of franchise loan servicing assets included a weighted-average discount rate of 13.0%, annual prepayment speeds ranging
from 2.8% to 8.3%, a weighted-average servicing fee of 0.29% and an average servicing cost of $1,000 per loan. Significant assumptions utilized in the December 31, 1999 valuation of franchise loan servicing assets included a weighted-average
discount rate of 12.0%, annual prepayment speeds ranging from 0.5% to 5.5%, a weighted-average servicing fee of 0.27% and an average servicing cost of $350 per loan. Significant assumptions utilized in the December 31, 1999 valuation of multi-family
mortgage loan servicing assets included a weighted-average discount rate of 12.0%, annual prepayment speeds ranging from 0.5% to 10.0%, a weighted-average servicing fee of 0.19% and an average servicing cost of $2,000 per loan.
Impaired loans and leases, consisting entirely of nonaccrual loans and leases, totaled $100.1 million at December 31,
2000, $22.9 million at December 31, 1999 and $14.7 million at December 31, 1998. Interest on nonaccrual loans and leases that was not recorded in income was $6.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2000, $736,000 for 1999 and $492,000 for 1998.
We recognized $5.1 million in actual interest on nonaccrual loans and leases for the year ended December 31, 2000. Actual interest that we recognized on nonaccrual loans and leases was not significant in 1999 or 1998. At December 31, 2000, we had no
commitments to lend additional funds to these borrowers. The average investment in loans and leases for which impairment was determined in accordance with Statement No. 114 was $55.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2000, $15.5 million for
1999 and $15.2 million for 1998.
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following table includes off-balance sheet amounts related to securitized financial assets and illustrates
delinquencies, net charge-offs, and components of securitized financial assets and other assets managed together with them:
| |
|
Gross Loan
Principal Balance
|
|
Principal Amount of
Loans Delinquent
60 Days or More
|
|
Net Charge-offs
|
| |
|
At December 31,
|
|
For the Year Ended
December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Mortgage loans |
|
$1,343,295 |
|
$1,928,782 |
|
$ 15,432 |
|
$ 9,891 |
|
$ 204 |
|
$ 220 |
| Home equity loans |
|
302,897 |
|
648,676 |
|
8,465 |
|
7,957 |
|
14,857 |
|
18,038 |
| Auto loans(1) |
|
680,401 |
|
770,984 |
|
1,944 |
|
2,039 |
|
7,074 |
|
7,002 |
| Franchise loans and leases (1) |
|
2,929,250 |
|
2,979,554 |
|
353,216 |
|
50,305 |
|
21,432 |
|
2,055 |
Asset-based loans, factoring loans,
commercial leases and business loans |
|
434,727 |
|
327,648 |
|
6,872 |
|
1,639 |
|
10,985 |
|
2,945 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total loans managed or securitized |
|
$5,690,570 |
|
$6,655,644 |
|
$385,929 |
|
$71,831 |
|
$54,552 |
|
$30,260 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Less: |
| Loans and leases securitized |
|
2,542,709 |
|
2,301,394 |
| Loans and leases held-for-sale |
|
345,207 |
|
66,247 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross loans and leases held-for-
investment |
|
$2,802,654 |
|
$4,288,003 |
| |
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes off-balance sheet amounts associated with securitized assets.
|
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following table illustrates our allowance for losses on loans and leases, as well as the changes thereto, as of and
for the periods indicated:
| |
|
At and For the Year Ended
December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ 52,161 |
|
|
$ 45,405 |
|
|
$ 38,458 |
|
| Reserves related to entity and asset acquisitions |
|
— |
|
|
8,256 |
|
|
11,374 |
|
| Transfers of loans to held-for-sale |
|
(15,210 |
) |
|
(2,656 |
) |
|
— |
|
| Charge-offs: |
| Mortgage |
|
(422 |
) |
|
(827 |
) |
|
(2,480 |
) |
| Home equity |
|
(18,014 |
) |
|
(19,568 |
) |
|
(7,152 |
) |
| Auto |
|
(2,953 |
) |
|
(7,674 |
) |
|
(8,604 |
) |
| Asset-based loans, factoring loans and commercial leases |
|
(4,425 |
) |
|
(3,176 |
) |
|
(828 |
) |
| Franchise |
|
(1,128 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
| Business |
|
(7,926 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
(34,868 |
) |
|
(31,245 |
) |
|
(19,064 |
) |
| Recoveries: |
| Mortgage |
|
218 |
|
|
607 |
|
|
2,290 |
|
| Home equity |
|
3,157 |
|
|
1,530 |
|
|
456 |
|
| Auto |
|
1,488 |
|
|
1,722 |
|
|
2,599 |
|
| Asset-based loans, factoring loans and commercial leases |
|
1,366 |
|
|
231 |
|
|
178 |
|
| Franchise |
|
2,826 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
9,055 |
|
|
4,090 |
|
|
5,523 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net charge-offs |
|
(25,813 |
) |
|
(27,155 |
) |
|
(13,541 |
) |
| Provision for losses on loans and leases |
|
62,600 |
|
|
28,311 |
|
|
9,114 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Balance at end of year |
|
$ 73,738 |
|
|
$ 52,161 |
|
|
$ 45,405 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Allowance for losses on loans and leases: |
| Mortgage |
|
$ 7,111 |
|
|
$ 3,317 |
|
|
$ 11,305 |
|
| Home equity |
|
9,591 |
|
|
21,976 |
|
|
15,541 |
|
| Franchise |
|
32,438 |
|
|
10,474 |
|
|
— |
|
| Auto |
|
2,593 |
|
|
5,877 |
|
|
6,780 |
|
| Asset-based loans, factoring loans and commercial leases |
|
10,170 |
|
|
7,399 |
|
|
3,352 |
|
| Unallocated |
|
11,835 |
|
|
3,118 |
|
|
8,427 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
$ 73,738 |
|
|
$ 52,161 |
|
|
$ 45,405 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An allowance for losses on loans and leases was provided for all impaired loans and leases at December 31, 2000, 1999
and 1998. The portion of the total allowance for loan and lease losses that was attributable to impaired loans was $31.1 million at December 31, 2000, $4.9 million at December 31, 1999 and $1.0 million at December 31, 1998.
At December 31, 2000 and 1999, mortgage loans aggregating $869.1 million and $852.4 million, respectively, were pledged
as collateral for advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco. Also, $127.3 million and $436.3 million, of franchise loans were pledged as collateral for our warehouse line at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Note 8. Premises and Equipment
The following table illustrates our premises and equipment as of the dates indicated:
| |
|
At December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Land |
|
$ 1,658 |
|
|
$ 1,658 |
|
| Buildings |
|
2,987 |
|
|
2,756 |
|
| Capitalized leases |
|
— |
|
|
3,979 |
|
| Leasehold improvements |
|
16,771 |
|
|
17,380 |
|
| Furniture and equipment |
|
32,758 |
|
|
36,559 |
|
| Other |
|
18 |
|
|
97 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
54,192 |
|
|
62,429 |
|
| Less: |
| Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
(36,889 |
) |
|
(35,213 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
$ 17,303 |
|
|
$27,216 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense related to premises and equipment totaled $8.6 million for the year ended December
31, 2000, $7.9 million for 1999 and $6.8 million for 1998.
Note 9. Intangible Assets
The following table illustrates our intangible assets as of the dates indicated:
| |
|
At December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Core deposit intangibles |
|
$ 13,849 |
|
|
$ 13,849 |
|
| Goodwill |
|
156,379 |
|
|
339,516 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
170,228 |
|
|
353,365 |
|
| Less: |
| Accumulated amortization |
|
(35,292 |
) |
|
(24,360 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
$134,936 |
|
|
$329,005 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
On September 11, 2000, we announced the restructuring of FMAC’s franchise lending operations. The shutdown of this
division was effective as of September 30, 2000 and involved the termination of all related production and marketing personnel. In connection with this restructuring, goodwill of $192.6 million was written off, representing the entire unamortized
balance associated with FMAC.
Amortization expense for core deposit intangibles was $1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2000, $3.4 million
for 1999 and $3.7 million for 1998.
Amortization expense for goodwill was $18.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2000, $10.3 million for 1999 and
$7.7 million for 1998. This included amortization expense for FMAC-related goodwill of $9.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2000 and $1.7 million for 1999.
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Note 10. Deposits
The following table illustrates our deposits as of the dates indicated:
| |
|
At December 31, 2000
|
| |
|
Amount
|
|
% of
Total
|
|
Weighted-
Average Rate
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Savings accounts |
|
$ 133,551 |
|
3.5 |
% |
|
2.00 |
% |
| Checking accounts |
|
512,865 |
|
13.7 |
|
|
1.16 |
|
| Money market accounts |
|
962,083 |
|
25.7 |
|
|
4.69 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total transaction accounts |
|
1,608,499 |
|
42.9 |
|
|
3.54 |
|
| Retail certificates of deposit |
|
1,872,562 |
|
50.0 |
|
|
6.04 |
|
| Brokered certificates of deposit |
|
265,251 |
|
7.1 |
|
|
7.16 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
$3,746,312 |
|
100.0 |
% |
|
5.05 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
At December 31, 1999
|
| |
|
Amount
|
|
% of
Total
|
|
Weighted-
Average Rate
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Savings accounts |
|
$ 145,565 |
|
3.9 |
% |
|
2.01 |
% |
| Checking accounts |
|
460,357 |
|
12.4 |
|
|
0.99 |
|
| Money market accounts |
|
1,097,201 |
|
29.4 |
|
|
4.17 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total transaction accounts |
|
1,703,123 |
|
45.7 |
|
|
3.26 |
|
| Retail certificates of deposit |
|
1,637,127 |
|
43.9 |
|
|
4.92 |
|
| Brokered certificates of deposit |
|
389,530 |
|
10.4 |
|
|
6.18 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
$3,729,780 |
|
100.0 |
% |
|
4.30 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits were $77.9 million at December 31, 2000 and $52.3 million at December 31, 1999. The
aggregate amount of retail certificates of deposit individually exceeding $100,000 totaled $549.9 million at December 31, 2000 and $424.0 million at December 31, 1999. Retail certificates of deposit outstanding at December 31, 2000 were scheduled to
mature as follows:
| |
|
At December 31,
2000
|
| |
|
(Dollars in
thousands) |
| 2001 |
|
$1,787,192 |
| 2002 |
|
71,761 |
| 2003 |
|
10,639 |
| 2004 |
|
1,249 |
| 2005 |
|
966 |
| Thereafter |
|
755 |
| |
|
|
| Total |
|
$1,872,562 |
| |
|
|
Our brokered certificates of deposit outstanding at December 31, 2000 ranged in amounts from $5.0 million to $50.0
million and are all scheduled to mature within one year.
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following table illustrates interest expense on deposits, by deposit type, for the periods indicated:
| |
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Savings accounts |
|
$ 2,353 |
|
$ 2,444 |
|
$ 2,411 |
| Checking and money market accounts |
|
52,910 |
|
53,443 |
|
67,397 |
| Certificates of deposit |
|
121,339 |
|
86,540 |
|
79,848 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
$176,602 |
|
$142,427 |
|
$149,656 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 11. Advances From the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
The following table illustrates outstanding advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco, sometimes
referred to as the FHLB, by maturity and rate, as of the dates indicated:
| |
|
Principal Amounts
|
|
Weighted-
Average Rate
|
| |
|
At December 31,
|
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| 2000 |
|
$ — |
|
$ 722,500 |
|
— |
% |
|
5.51 |
% |
| 2001 |
|
530,437 |
|
190,400 |
|
6.29 |
|
|
5.75 |
|
| 2002 |
|
24,400 |
|
24,400 |
|
4.83 |
|
|
4.83 |
|
| 2003 |
|
200,000 |
|
300,000 |
|
4.92 |
|
|
5.02 |
|
| 2004 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
| 2005 |
|
50,000 |
|
130,000 |
|
5.37 |
|
|
5.40 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
804,837 |
|
$1,367,300 |
|
5.85 |
% |
|
5.41 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our advances from the FHLB at December 31, 2000 included $20 million of variable-rate advances. These advances mature in
the year 2001 and reset semi-annually based on the 6-month London Interbank Offered Rate, sometimes referred to as LIBOR. These advances were collateralized by mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities totaling $966.4 million at December 31,
2000 and $1.4 billion at December 31, 1999. In June 2000 we auctioned $180 million of Federal Home Loan Bank liabilities with below-market interest rates.
Bay View Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank System. As a member, Bay View Bank is required to purchase stock
in the FHLB at an amount equal to the greater of 1% of its residential mortgage loans or 5% of outstanding FHLB advances. The stock is purchased at par value ($100 per share) and shares of stock held in excess of the minimum requirement may be sold
back to the FHLB at par value. Bay View Bank records its investment in FHLB stock at cost (par value). At December 31, 2000, Bay View Bank’s investment in FHLB stock was $40.2 million and its minimum required investment was $40.2 million. The
stock is pledged as collateral for advances from the FHLB. The FHLB generally declares quarterly stock dividends. The amount of these dividends recorded in income was $4.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2000, $4.5 million for 1999 and $4.9
million for 1998.
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Note 12. Short-term Borrowings
The following table illustrates our short-term borrowings as of the dates indicated:
| |
|
At December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
$103,241 |
|
$ 17,883 |
| Warehouse lines |
|
94,134 |
|
397,538 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
$197,375 |
|
$415,421 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are effectively borrowings secured by our portfolio of mortgage-backed
securities. The securities sold under the terms of these agreements are in safekeeping with the registered primary securities dealers who arrange the transactions. The weighted-average interest rate on repurchase agreements outstanding was 6.61% at
December 31, 2000 and 6.29% at December 31, 1999. All of our borrowings under repurchase agreements have maturities of one year or less and were collateralized by mortgage-backed securities with a par value of $112.5 million at December 31, 2000 and
$20.4 million at December 31, 1999. The contractually required market values of the collateral pledged against these borrowings may range up to 106% of the borrowings at the time of sale. The market value of the mortgage-backed securities
collateralizing these borrowings was $108.9 million at December 31, 2000 and $20.2 million at December 31, 1999.
Warehouse lines are short-term lines of credit which we utilize to fund loan and lease originations. All of our
borrowings under warehouse lines have maturities of one year or less and were collateralized by franchise loans with a par value of $127.3 million at December 31, 2000. We pay interest monthly on the average outstanding principal balance at a spread
over one-month LIBOR of 150 basis points. We recorded $1.9 million in commitment fee expense associated with the warehouse lines for the year ended December 31, 2000 and $371,000 for 1999.
The following tables illustrates our warehouse lines as of the dates indicated:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2000
|
Lender
|
|
Expiration Date
|
|
Index
|
|
Interest
Rate
|
|
Committed
Amount
|
|
Principal
Outstanding
|
Greenwich Capital Financial
Products, Inc.(1) |
|
March 31, 2001 |
|
One-month LIBOR plus
150 basis points |
|
8.20 |
% |
|
$170,000 |
|
$ 94,134 |
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 1999
|
Lender
|
|
Expiration Date
|
|
Index
|
|
Interest
Rate(6)
|
|
Committed
Amount
|
|
Principal
Outstanding
|
Morgan Stanley Asset
Funding, Inc.(2) |
|
July 15, 2000(4) |
|
One-month LIBOR plus
160 basis points |
|
7.42 |
% |
|
$500,000 |
|
$397,538 |
Residential Funding
Corporation(3) |
|
March 31, 2000(5) |
|
One-month LIBOR plus
100 basis points |
|
6.82 |
% |
|
100,000 |
|
— |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Totals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$600,000 |
|
$397,538 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The Greenwich Capital Financial Products, Inc. line of credit is used to finance franchise loans.
|
(2)
|
The Morgan Stanley Asset Funding, Inc. line of credit was used to finance franchise loans.
|
(3)
|
The Residential Funding Corporation line of credit was used to fund multi-family loans originated by Bankers Mutual pending
sale into the secondary market.
|
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(4)
|
The Morgan Stanley Asset Funding, Inc. line of credit was extended during 2000 and expired on October 20, 2000.
|
(5)
|
The Residential Funding Corporation line of credit was extended during 2000 and expired on June, 30, 2000.
|
(6)
|
The spread over one-month LIBOR ranged from 85 basis points to 160 basis points.
|
Note 13. Notes and Debentures
On August 18, 1999, Bay View Bank issued $50 million in Subordinated Notes. The Subordinated Notes are unsecured
obligations of Bay View Bank and are subordinated in right of payment to all existing and future senior indebtedness, as defined, of Bay View Bank. The Subordinated Notes mature on August 31, 2009, with a call provision at our option any time after
August 31, 2002 at par. The issuance has a stated coupon of 10.00%. The all-in cost of the Subordinated Notes was 10.57%. A portion of the proceeds was dividended to Bay View Capital Corporation and used to partially finance the acquisition of FMAC.
Interest expense on the Subordinated Notes was $5.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2000 and $1.9 million for 1999. These Subordinated Notes qualify as Tier 2 capital for both Bay View Bank and Bay View Capital Corporation regulatory capital
purposes.
On August 28, 1997, Bay View Capital Corporation issued $100 million in Subordinated Notes registered under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The Subordinated Notes are unsecured obligations of Bay View Capital Corporation and are subordinated in right of payment to all existing and future senior indebtedness, as defined, of Bay View Capital
Corporation. The Subordinated Notes mature on August 15, 2007, with a call provision effective on or after August 15, 2002 or, at any time upon a change of control or the occurrence of certain other events, at our option, at various premiums through
August 15, 2005 and at par thereafter. The issuance has a stated coupon of 9.125% and was issued at a discount to yield 9.225%. The all-in cost of the Subordinated Notes was 9.62%. A portion of the proceeds was used to partially finance the
acquisition of AFEH. Interest expense on the Subordinated Notes was $9.6 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998. These Subordinated Notes qualify as Tier 2 capital for Bay View Capital Corporation regulatory capital
purposes.
On May 28, 1996, Bay View Capital Corporation issued $50 million in Senior Debentures with a stated coupon of 8.42%
which were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, in a private placement under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. A portion of the proceeds was used to partially finance the acquisition of Bay View Credit. The Senior Debentures, which had
an all-in cost of 8.91%, matured on June 1, 1999. In conjunction with the acquisition of AFEH, we negotiated covenant modifications with the Senior Debenture holders during 1997 to allow the repurchase of additional shares of common stock in
exchange for a payment to the Senior Debenture holders of approximately $1.1 million. Interest expense on the Senior Debentures was $1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 1999 and $4.5 million for 1998.
Note 14. Capital Securities
On December 21, 1998, we issued $90 million in Capital Securities through Bay View Capital I, sometimes referred to as
the Trust. The Capital Securities pay quarterly cumulative cash distributions at an annual rate of 9.76% of the liquidation value of $25 per share. The Capital Securities represent undivided beneficial interests in the Trust. We own all of the
issued and outstanding common securities of the Trust. Proceeds from the offering and from the issuance of common securities were invested by the Trust in our 9.76% Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures, sometimes referred to as the
Junior Debentures, due December 31, 2028 with an aggregate principal amount of $92.8 million. The primary asset of the Trust is the Junior Debentures. The obligations of the Trust with respect to the Capital Securities are fully and unconditionally
guaranteed by us to
the extent provided in the Guarantee Agreement with respect to the Capital Securities. We used a portion of the proceeds to repay our $50 million Senior Debentures upon their maturity on June 1, 1999 and the balance for general corporate purposes.
The all-in cost of the Capital Securities was 9.95%. The Capital Securities have the added benefit of qualifying as Tier 1 capital for regulatory capital purposes.
In September of 2000, we entered into an agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank which requires that we obtain their
approval prior to disbursing any dividends associated with our Capital Securities (see Note 4). For the third and fourth quarters of 2000, our requests for approval were denied. As a result, pursuant to the terms of the Capital Securities, we have
deferred distributions until such time as approval can be obtained. During this deferral period, distributions to which holders are entitled will continue to accrue at an annual rate of 9.76% of the liquidation amount of $25 per Capital Security,
plus accumulated additional distributions at the same rate, compounded quarterly, on any unpaid distributions (to the extent permitted by law). Holders of the Capital Securities at the time the distribution of dividends is resumed will receive the
cumulative deferred distributions plus the cumulative interest thereon. Dividend expense on the Capital Securities was $9.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2000, $8.9 million for 1999 and $244,000 for 1998.
Note 15. Income Taxes
The following table illustrates our consolidated income tax expense (benefit) for the periods indicated:
| |
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2000
|
| |
|
Federal
|
|
State
|
|
Total
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Current provision |
|
$ 5,200 |
|
|
$ 35 |
|
|
$ 5,235 |
|
| Deferred provision |
|
(41,997 |
) |
|
(19,048 |
) |
|
(61,045 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total income tax expense (benefit) |
|
$(36,797 |
) |
|
$(19,013 |
) |
|
$(55,810 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 1999
|
| Current provision |
|
$ 815 |
|
|
$ 2,315 |
|
|
$ 3,130 |
|
| Deferred provision |
|
19,669 |
|
|
2,254 |
|
|
21,923 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total income tax expense |
|
$ 20,484 |
|
|
$ 4,569 |
|
|
$ 25,053 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 1998
|
| Current provision |
|
$ 1,393 |
|
|
$ 812 |
|
|
$ 2,205 |
|
| Deferred provision |
|
15,064 |
|
|
3,946 |
|
|
19,010 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total income tax expense |
|
$ 16,457 |
|
|
$ 4,758 |
|
|
$ 21,215 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table illustrates the reconciliation between the federal statutory income tax rate and the effective
income tax rate for the periods indicated:
| |
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
| Federal statutory income tax rate |
|
35.0 |
% |
|
35.0 |
% |
|
35.0 |
% |
| Amortization of goodwill |
|
(15.3 |
) |
|
6.2 |
|
|
6.1 |
|
| Valuation allowance |
|
(6.8 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
| State income tax rate, net of federal tax benefit |
|
3.2 |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
7.0 |
|
| Other, net |
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
0.2 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Effective income tax rate |
|
14.6 |
% |
|
46.4 |
% |
|
48.3 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Our stockholders’ equity included a tax benefit associated with the exercise of stock options of $3,000 for the
year ended December 31, 2000, $92,000 for 1999 and $1.2 million for 1998.
The following table illustrates the components of net deferred tax assets as of the dates indicated:
| |
|
At December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Deferred tax assets: |
| Net operating loss carryforwards |
|
$101,806 |
|
|
$67,186 |
|
| Provision for losses on loans and leases |
|
44,093 |
|
|
31,293 |
|
| Mark-to-market adjustment, net |
|
37,173 |
|
|
— |
|
| Other accrued expenses not deducted for tax purposes |
|
11,090 |
|
|
5,984 |
|
| Intangible assets |
|
5,036 |
|
|
3,114 |
|
| Alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards |
|
4,332 |
|
|
4,332 |
|
| Capitalized leases |
|
757 |
|
|
555 |
|
| Unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale |
|
— |
|
|
206 |
|
| Other |
|
100 |
|
|
2,221 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Gross deferred tax assets |
|
204,387 |
|
|
114,891 |
|
|
| |
| Valuation allowance |
|
(26,000 |
) |
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net deferred tax asset |
|
178,387 |
|
|
114,891 |
|
|
| |
| Deferred tax liabilities: |
| Tax depreciation in excess of book depreciation |
|
(47,689 |
) |
|
(30,110 |
) |
| Securitizations |
|
(23,624 |
) |
|
(25,047 |
) |
| Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco stock dividends |
|
(4,451 |
) |
|
(9,102 |
) |
| Loan fees |
|
(3,607 |
) |
|
(3,734 |
) |
| Excess over base year reserves |
|
(2,704 |
) |
|
(4,412 |
) |
| Real estate partnership investments |
|
(1,800 |
) |
|
(1,800 |
) |
| Loan premiums |
|
(185 |
) |
|
(696 |
) |
| Unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale |
|
(7 |
) |
|
— |
|
| Mark-to-market adjustment, net |
|
— |
|
|
(12,967 |
) |
| Other |
|
(1,253 |
) |
|
(463 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Gross deferred tax liabilities |
|
(85,320 |
) |
|
(88,331 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net deferred tax asset |
|
$ 93,067 |
|
|
$26,560 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2000 included approximately $5.2 million in expense to establish a
liability for the recapture of bad debt reserves that arose in the tax years which began prior to January 1, 1988, for which a deferred tax liability had not been established. At December 31, 2000, there was no remaining unrecognized deferred tax
liability for these reserves.
The acquisition of FMAC during 1999 decreased net deferred tax assets by $11.6 million.
At December 31, 2000, the federal and state net operating loss carryforwards were $262.5 million and $101.6 million,
respectively. They will expire in various years from 2001 through 2020.
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following table illustrates the yearly expiration of the federal net operating loss carryforwards:
At December 31, 2000
|
Year of Expiration
|
|
Federal Net Operating
Loss
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| 2001 |
|
$ 48,633 |
| 2002 |
|
30,416 |
| 2003 |
|
28,834 |
| 2004 |
|
28,016 |
| 2005 |
|
12,564 |
| 2006 |
|
7,555 |
| 2010 |
|
57 |
| 2011 |
|
1,746 |
| 2018 |
|
3,543 |
| 2019 |
|
20,056 |
| 2020 |
|
81,096 |
| |
|
|
| |
|
$262,516 |
| |
|
|
The expiration of state net operating loss carryforwards vary by state. Our state net operating loss carryforwards
expire primarily in the years 2001 through 2005.
We have federal and state alternative minimum tax credits of $3.6 million and $0.7 million, respectively. These credits
can be carried forward indefinitely to reduce future regular tax.
A valuation allowance on deferred tax assets is recorded if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the
deferred tax assets will not be realized through recovery of taxes previously paid and/or future taxable income. The allowance is subject to ongoing adjustments based on changes in circumstances that affect our assessment of the realizability of the
deferred tax assets. We have reviewed our deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999. Based upon this review, a valuation allowance was established to reduce the deferred tax assets to that amount which is more likely than not to be
realized. This valuation allowance totaled $26 million at December 31, 2000 and $0 at December 31, 1999.
Amounts for the current year net deferred tax assets are based upon estimates and assumptions as of the date of this
report and could vary significantly from amounts shown on our tax returns as filed. Accordingly, the variances from the amounts of net deferred tax assets previously reported for 1999 are primarily a result of adjustments to conform to our tax
returns as filed.
Note 16. Stockholders’ Equity and Regulatory Capital Requirements
Bay View Bank is a national bank regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”). Bay
View Capital Corporation is a bank holding company regulated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve.
Under regulatory capital adequacy guidelines, Bay View Capital Corporation and Bay View Bank must meet specific capital
guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated in accordance with GAAP and regulatory capital guidelines. Our capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative
judgments by the regulators about interest rate risk components, asset and off-balance sheet risk weightings and other factors. The regulators also have the discretion to set
individual minimum capital requirements for specific institutions at rates significantly above minimum guidelines and ratios.
Additionally, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991, sometimes referred to as FDICIA,
requires each federal banking agency to implement prompt corrective actions for undercapitalized institutions that it regulates. The prompt corrective action regulations define specific capital categories based on an institution’s capital
ratios. The five capital categories are “well-capitalized”, “adequately capitalized”, “undercapitalized”, “significantly undercapitalized”, and “critically undercapitalized”. Institutions categorized
as “undercapitalized” or worse are subject to certain restrictions, including the requirement to file a capital plan with its primary federal regulator, prohibitions on the payment of dividends and management fees, restrictions on
executive compensation, and increased supervisory monitoring, among other things. Other restrictions may be imposed on the institution either by its primary federal regulator or by the FDIC, including requirements to raise additional capital, sell
assets or sell the entire institution. Once an institution becomes “critically undercapitalized” it must generally be placed in receivership or conservatorship within 90 days.
To be considered “adequately capitalized”, an institution must generally have a Tier 1 leverage ratio of at
least 4%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 4%, and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 8%. An institution is deemed to be “critically undercapitalized” if it has a tangible equity ratio of 2% or less.
|
Regulatory Capital Requirements for Bay View Bank
|
The OCC regulates Bay View Bank and provides definitions of regulatory capital ratios (e.g., Tier 1 leverage, Tier 1
risk-based and total risk-based) and the methods of calculating capital and each ratio. The minimum Tier 1 leverage capital requirement is 4.0% of adjusted quarterly average assets, as defined. The minimum Tier 1 risk-based capital
requirement is 4.0% of risk-weighted assets, including certain off-balance sheet items. The minimum total risk-based capital requirement (Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital) is 8.0% of risk-weighted assets, including certain off-balance sheet
items.
The OCC has adopted final capital rules based on FDICIA’s five capital categories. Regulations provide that capital
be calculated using a Tier 1 leverage ratio, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio, and a total risk-based ratio. As used herein, total risk-based capital ratio means the ratio of total risk-based capital to risk-weighted assets, including off-balance
sheet items, Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio means the ratio of core capital to risk-weighted assets, including off-balance sheet items, and Tier 1 ratio means the ratio of core capital to adjusted total average assets, in each case as calculated in
accordance with current agency capital regulations.
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
At December 31, 2000 and 1999, Bay View Bank was considered adequately-capitalized with its regulatory capital levels
exceeding the minimum requirements.
| |
|
At December 31, 2000
|
|
At December 31, 1999
|
| |
|
Actual
|
|
Minimum
Requirement
|
|
Actual
|
|
Minimum
Requirement
|
| |
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Tier 1 leverage |
|
$218,736 |
|
4.23 |
% |
|
$206,835 |
|
4.00 |
% |
|
$406,001 |
|
6.87 |
% |
|
$236,337 |
|
4.00 |
% |
| Tier 1 risk-based |
|
$218,736 |
|
6.30 |
% |
|
$138,875 |
|
4.00 |
% |
|
$406,001 |
|
8.41 |
% |
|
$193,024 |
|
4.00 |
% |
| Total risk-based |
|
$312,582 |
|
9.00 |
% |
|
$277,751 |
|
8.00 |
% |
|
$507,516 |
|
10.52 |
% |
|
$386,048 |
|
8.00 |
% |
|
Regulatory Capital Requirements for Bay View Capital Corporation as a Bank Holding Company
|
The regulations administered by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve (the “Federal Reserve Board”)
provide definitions of regulatory capital ratios and the methods of calculating capital and each ratio for bank holding companies. Such regulations require a minimum ratio of qualifying total risk-based capital to risk-adjusted assets of 8% and a
minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-adjusted assets of 4%. In addition to the risk-based guidelines, federal banking regulators require banking organizations to maintain a minimum amount of Tier 1 capital to total average assets, referred to as
the leverage ratio. For a bank holding companies rated in the highest of the five categories used by regulators to rate banking organizations, the minimum leverage ratio of Tier 1 capital to total average assets is 3%. For organizations not rated in
the highest of the five categories, which includes Bay View Capital Corporation, the regulations require an additional “cushion” of at least 100 to 200 basis points.
At December 31, 2000, Bay View Capital Corporation exceeded the minimum requirements for Total and Tier 1 risk-based
capital while its Tier 1 leverage ratio of 3.47% fell below the minimum required amount. Accordingly, in January 2001, we filed a capital plan, pursuant to the terms of our regulatory agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco,
indicating our intention to meet the required minimum capital ratios by March 31, 2001 and maintain appropriate capital levels thereafter. This capital plan has yet to be approved by the Federal Reserve Board.
At this time, the financial impact, if any, of the regulatory actions that may result from our failure to meet the
minimum capital requirements cannot be determined. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. Additionally, execution of this capital plan depends on certain future
events and circumstances, the outcome of which cannot be guaranteed. Nevertheless, management believes, at this time, that the institution will meet all the provisions of the plan and therefore achieve the plan’s regulatory capital goals.
Significant aspects of the capital plan include utilizing excess cash to pay off specific fundings, thereby reducing assets to improve the leverage ratio. In addition, the plan includes the realization of contingent gains during the first quarter of
2001 primarily related to securities sold in December 2000.
The following table represents Bay View Capital Corporation’s regulatory capital levels as of the dates
indicated:
| |
|
At December 31, 2000
|
|
At December 31, 1999
|
| |
|
Actual
|
|
Minimum
Requirement
|
|
Actual
|
|
Minimum
Requirement
|
| |
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Tier 1 leverage |
|
$190,686 |
|
3.47 |
% |
|
$219,886 |
|
4.00 |
% |
|
$386,110 |
|
6.51 |
% |
|
$237,247 |
|
4.00 |
% |
| Tier 1 risk-based |
|
$190,686 |
|
4.59 |
% |
|
$166,284 |
|
4.00 |
% |
|
$386,110 |
|
7.17 |
% |
|
$215,475 |
|
4.00 |
% |
| Total risk-based |
|
$338,374 |
|
8.14 |
% |
|
$332,568 |
|
8.00 |
% |
|
$587,773 |
|
10.91 |
% |
|
$430,950 |
|
8.00 |
% |
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following tables reconcile stockholders’ equity under GAAP with regulatory capital for Bay View Bank and Bay
View Capital Corporation at December 31, 2000 and 1999:
| |
|
At December 31, 2000
|
| |
|
Bay View Bank
|
|
Bay View Capital
Corporation
|
| |
|
Tier 1
|
|
Total
Risk-based
|
|
Tier 1
|
|
Total
Risk-based
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Stockholders’ equity (GAAP) |
|
$395,536 |
|
|
$395,536 |
|
|
$297,849 |
|
|
$297,849 |
|
| Increase (decrease): |
| Goodwill and identifiable intangible assets |
|
(134,936 |
) |
|
(134,936 |
) |
|
(134,936 |
) |
|
(134,936 |
) |
| Disallowed servicing assets |
|
(1,361 |
) |
|
(1,361 |
) |
|
(1,540 |
) |
|
(1,540 |
) |
| Disallowed deferred tax assets |
|
(40,372 |
) |
|
(40,372 |
) |
|
(60,677 |
) |
|
(60,677 |
) |
| Capital Securities |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
90,000 |
|
Disallowed unrealized gain on securities
available-for-sale |
|
(131 |
) |
|
(131 |
) |
|
(10 |
) |
|
(10 |
) |
Qualifying allowance for losses on loans and
leases |
|
— |
|
|
43,734 |
|
|
— |
|
|
52,234 |
|
| Qualifying subordinated debt |
|
— |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
— |
|
|
95,343 |
|
Qualifying gain on equity securities available-for-
sale |
|
— |
|
|
112 |
|
|
— |
|
|
111 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Regulatory
capital |
|
$218,736 |
|
|
$312,582 |
|
|
$190,686 |
|
|
$338,374 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
At December 31, 1999
|
| |
|
Bay View Bank
|
|
Bay View Capital
Corporation
|
| |
|
Tier 1
|
|
Total
Risk-based
|
|
Tier 1
|
|
Total
Risk-based
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Stockholders’ equity (GAAP) |
|
$740,628 |
|
|
$740,628 |
|
|
$631,194 |
|
|
$631,194 |
|
| Increase (decrease): |
| Goodwill and identifiable intangible assets |
|
(320,044 |
) |
|
(320,044 |
) |
|
(321,141 |
) |
|
(321,141 |
) |
| Non-qualifying core deposit intangibles |
|
(7,731 |
) |
|
(7,731 |
) |
|
(7,731 |
) |
|
(7,731 |
) |
| Disallowed servicing assets |
|
(6,852 |
) |
|
(6,852 |
) |
|
(6,212 |
) |
|
(6,212 |
) |
| Capital Securities |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
90,000 |
|
Qualifying allowance for losses on loans and
leases |
|
— |
|
|
51,515 |
|
|
— |
|
|
52,161 |
|
| Subordinated debt |
|
— |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
— |
|
|
149,502 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Regulatory
capital |
|
$406,001 |
|
|
$507,516 |
|
|
$386,110 |
|
|
$587,773 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency has adopted rules incorporating an interest rate risk component of the
capital adequacy guidelines for institutions with a greater than “normal” level of interest rate risk exposure, as defined. As of December 31, 2000, Bay View Bank was not subject to an interest rate risk component for capital measurement
purposes.
Bay View Capital Corporation’s principal source of funds on an unconsolidated basis has historically been dividends
from our wholly owned subsidiaries, including Bay View Bank. Dividends declared by Bay View Bank to Bay View Capital Corporation were $69.6 million in 2000, $89.6 million in 1999 and $87.0 million in 1998.
There are various statutory and regulatory restrictions on the extent to which Bay View Bank may pay dividends to, make investments in or loans to, or otherwise supply funds to Bay View Capital Corporation. As a national bank, Bay View Bank may pay
dividends in any one calendar year equal to its net earnings in that calendar year plus net earnings for the previous two calendar years, less any dividends paid during this three-year period. As discussed in Note 4, during the third quarter of
2000, we entered into formal agreements with the OCC and the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. These agreements, among other things, require prior approval for Bay View Bank to pay dividends to Bay View Capital Corporation and also require
approval to pay dividends on our common stock and our Capital Securities. Through July 2000, Bay View Bank paid $29.1 million in dividends to Bay View Capital Corporation in excess of the amount permitted pursuant to the aforementioned statutory and
regulatory restrictions. Bay View Bank subsequently requested and received approval from the OCC for the amount of the overpayment.
As a national bank, effective March 1, 1999, Bay View Bank is required to hold stock in the Federal Reserve Bank
totaling 3.0% of the sum of its common stock and additional paid-in-capital. Bay View Bank records its investment in Federal Reserve Bank stock at cost (par value). Bay View Bank held $19.6 million in Federal Reserve Bank stock at December 31,
2000.
Note 17. Stock Repurchase Program
In August 1998, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $50 million in shares of our common stock.
During 1998, we repurchased $24.1 million in shares, representing 1,196,500 shares of our common stock at an average price of $20.11 per share. During 1999 we repurchased an additional $8.3 million in shares, representing 460,000 shares of our
common stock at an average price of $18.22 per share. In November 1999, our treasury shares were reissued in conjunction with the acquisition of FMAC. At December 31, 2000, we had approximately $17.6 million in remaining authorization available for
future share repurchases. Pursuant to our agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, we must obtain prior written approval before repurchasing shares.
Note 18. Stock Options
As of December 31, 2000, we had six stock option plans: the “Amended and Restated 1986 Stock Option and Incentive
Plan,” the “Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Option and Incentive Plan,” the “Amended and Restated 1989 Non-Employee Director Stock Option and Incentive Plan,” the “1998-2000 Performance Stock Plan,” the “1998
Non-Employee Director Stock Option and Incentive Plan,” and the “1999 FMAC Stock Option, Deferred Stock and Restricted Stock Plan” which authorize the issuance of up to 1,759,430, 2,500,000, 550,000, 400,000, 200,000, and 270,576
shares of common stock, respectively. The plans provide for the grant of a variety of long-term incentive awards to directors, officers and employees as a means of enhancing the recruitment and retention of those individuals on whom our continued
success most depends. The exercise price for the purchase of shares subject to a stock option at the date of grant generally may not be less than 100% of the market value of the shares covered by the option on that date and the options generally
vest over periods ranging from 6 months to 3 years and expire over periods ranging from 6 years to 13 years.
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following table illustrates the stock options available for grant as of December 31, 2000:
| |
|
1986 Stock
Option and
Incentive
Plan
|
|
1995 Stock
Option and
Incentive
Plan
|
|
1989 Non-
Employee
Director
Stock
Option and
Incentive
Plan
|
|
1998-2000
Performance
Stock Plan
|
|
1998 Non-
Employee
Director
Stock
Option and
Incentive
Plan
|
|
1999 FMAC
Stock Option,
Deferred
Stock and
Restricted
Stock Plan
|
|
Total
|
Shares reserved for
issuance |
|
1,759,430 |
|
|
2,500,000 |
|
|
550,000 |
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
270,576 |
|
|
5,680,006 |
|
| Granted |
|
(2,048,816 |
) |
|
(3,530,500 |
) |
|
(570,000 |
) |
|
(93,000 |
) |
|
(82,000 |
) |
|
(270,576 |
) |
|
(6,594,892 |
) |
| Forfeited |
|
304,574 |
|
|
1,242,198 |
|
|
77,000 |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
189,187 |
|
|
1,825,959 |
|
| Expired |
|
(15,188 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
(57,000 |
) |
|
(315,000 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(387,188 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available for
grant |
|
— |
|
|
211,698 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
123,000 |
|
|
189,187 |
|
|
523,885 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2000, we had outstanding options under the plans with expiration dates ranging from the year 2001
through 2013, as illustrated in the following table:
| |
|
Number of
Option Shares
|
|
Exercise Price
Range
|
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
|
| Outstanding at December 31, 1997 |
|
1,758,400 |
|
|
$ 7.88–34.41 |
|
$19.70 |
| Granted |
|
629,000 |
|
|
17.94–35.20 |
|
25.17 |
| Exercised |
|
(160,101 |
) |
|
7.88–28.44 |
|
12.17 |
| Forfeited |
|
(81,599 |
) |
|
8.69–35.20 |
|
28.11 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Outstanding at December 31, 1998 |
|
2,145,700 |
|
|
$ 7.88–35.20 |
|
$21.55 |
| Granted |
|
1,254,826 |
|
|
13.81–19.53 |
|
15.26 |
| Exercised |
|
(40,500 |
) |
|
8.72–17.00 |
|
12.31 |
| Forfeited |
|
(452,250 |
) |
|
8.75–35.20 |
|
30.33 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Outstanding at December 31, 1999 |
|
2,907,776 |
|
|
$ 7.88–34.41 |
|
$17.49 |
| Granted |
|
823,250 |
|
|
5.41–10.03 |
|
7.53 |
| Exercised |
|
(6,000 |
) |
|
7.88– 7.88 |
|
7.88 |
| Forfeited |
|
(903,536 |
) |
|
7.53–32.56 |
|
14.88 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Outstanding at December 31, 2000 |
|
2,821,490 |
|
|
$ 5.41–34.41 |
|
$15.43 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Exercisable at December 31, 1998 |
|
1,047,507 |
|
|
$ 7.88-35.20 |
|
$17.31 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Exercisable at December 31, 1999 |
|
1,641,736 |
|
|
$ 7.88-34.41 |
|
$16.97 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Exercisable at December 31, 2000 |
|
1,681,167 |
|
|
$ 5.41–34.41 |
|
$18.11 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following table illustrates information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2000:
| |
|
Outstanding
|
|
Exercisable
|
Range of Exercise Prices
|
|
Number
Outstanding
|
|
Weighted-Average
Remaining Life
(in years)
|
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
|
|
Number
Exercisable
|
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
|
| 5.41– 5.41 |
|
312,500 |
|
12.06 |
|
$ 5.41 |
|
— |
|
$ — |
| 7.53– 9.09 |
|
336,500 |
|
9.12 |
|
8.47 |
|
45,500 |
|
8.63 |
| 9.13–11.85 |
|
294,554 |
|
6.38 |
|
9.95 |
|
178,054 |
|
10.32 |
| 11.88–12.86 |
|
290,796 |
|
4.61 |
|
12.41 |
|
290,796 |
|
12.41 |
| 13.31–13.97 |
|
284,200 |
|
7.96 |
|
13.81 |
|
130,375 |
|
13.66 |
| 15.63–17.94 |
|
480,750 |
|
6.37 |
|
16.84 |
|
396,750 |
|
16.61 |
| 18.17–19.53 |
|
295,000 |
|
6.94 |
|
18.97 |
|
178,100 |
|
19.09 |
| 20.21–28.44 |
|
313,139 |
|
6.35 |
|
26.20 |
|
301,539 |
|
26.14 |
| 29.00–32.69 |
|
209,001 |
|
7.21 |
|
31.04 |
|
155,003 |
|
30.84 |
| 34.41–34.41 |
|
5,050 |
|
6.95 |
|
34.41 |
|
5,050 |
|
34.41 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5.41–34.41 |
|
2,821,490 |
|
7.43 |
|
$15.43 |
|
1,681,167 |
|
$18.11 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On October 14, 1999, our stockholders voted to amend the Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Option and Incentive Plan to
increase the number of shares reserved for issuance by 500,000. During 1999, we repurchased 216,500 out-of-the-money stock options granted under the Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Option and Incentive Plan. These options, which had exercise prices
ranging from $34.13 to $35.20, were repurchased for $598,000, which was included in compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 1999. The amount paid for each option was based on the option’s fair value determined using a Black-Scholes
option pricing model.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 Pro Forma Disclosure
We adopted Statement No. 123 effective January 1, 1996, but continue to account for employee and director stock-based
compensation plans under the intrinsic value method prescribed by APB 25. Statement No. 123 requires that stock-based compensation to parties other than employees and directors be accounted for under the fair value method. Accordingly, no
compensation cost has been recognized for our stock option awards to employees and directors in 2000, 1999 and 1998, except as discussed above. The weighted-average fair value of options granted to employees and directors was $4.96, $6.76 and $7.97
per share in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. Had compensation cost related to our stock option awards to employees and directors been determined under the fair value method prescribed under Statement No. 123, our net income and earnings per share
would have been the pro forma amounts illustrated in the table below for the periods indicated:
| |
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) |
| Net income (loss): |
| Actual |
|
$(326,197 |
) |
|
$28,964 |
|
$22,719 |
| Pro forma |
|
$(327,441 |
) |
|
$26,321 |
|
$20,557 |
| Net income (loss) per share: |
| Actual basic earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ (10.00 |
) |
|
$ 1.37 |
|
$ 1.13 |
| Pro forma basic earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ (10.03 |
) |
|
$ 1.24 |
|
$ 1.03 |
| Actual diluted earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ (10.00 |
) |
|
$ 1.36 |
|
$ 1.12 |
| Pro forma diluted earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ (10.03 |
) |
|
$ 1.23 |
|
$ 1.01 |
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The fair value of options granted was estimated as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model
with the following weighted-average assumptions:
| |
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
| Dividend yield |
|
3.42 |
% |
|
2.32 |
% |
|
1.48 |
% |
| Expected volatility of our common stock |
|
35 |
% |
|
33 |
% |
|
32 |
% |
| Expected risk-free interest rate(1) |
|
4.98 |
% |
|
6.34 |
% |
|
4.54 |
% |
| Expected life of options in years |
|
5.44 |
|
|
5.41 |
|
|
5.37 |
|
(1)
|
The expected risk-free interest rate was calculated using a term commensurate with the expected life of the
options.
|
Note 19. Employee Benefit Plans
We have a 401(k) thrift plan under which an employee with three or more months of service may contribute from 2% to 15%
of base salary to the plan. The amount of base salary deferred is not subject to federal or state income taxes at the time of deferral. After one year of service, we will match an employee’s contribution up to 100% of the first 6% of the
employee’s base salary, depending on the employee’s length of service. Our contribution was $3.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2000, $2.3 million for 1999 and $2.1 million for 1998.
During 1999 and 2000, Bay View Franchise Mortgage Acceptance Company employees participated in a separate 401(k) plan.
Under the plan, an employee could elect to enroll at the beginning of any month after which the employee had been employed for at least six months. Employees could contribute up to 14% of their salaries to the plan. We matched 50% of the
employee’s contribution up to 4% of the employee’s compensation. This plan was terminated in 2000 and Bay View Franchise Mortgage Acceptance Company employees are now eligible to participate in the Bay View Capital Corporation 401(k) plan
discussed above.
Effective December 31, 1995, we modified our non-qualified defined benefit retirement plan for non-employee members of
our Board of Directors and terminated our non-qualified supplemental retirement plan for executive officers. As of December 31, 2000, we had a $1.1 million liability to certain non-employee members of our Board of Directors payable in 65,052 shares
of our common stock in satisfaction of the non-qualified defined benefit retirement plan liability. Such shares were repurchased in the market and are held in treasury and restricted as to re-issuance until paid out. The liability is included in
additional paid-in capital. As of December 31, 2000, we had a $1.2 million liability to certain current and retired executive officers (relating to the remaining benefits owed pursuant to the terminated non-qualified supplemental retirement plan for
executive officers) recorded as other liabilities.
We have an Employee Stock Ownership Plan, sometimes referred to as the ESOP, covering all regular full-time and
part-time employees who have completed one year of service. ESOP plan participants become 100% vested in their allocated balances upon the completion of three years of service. In 1989, we borrowed $6.0 million from a financial institution and in
turn lent it to the ESOP to purchase shares of our common stock in the open market. The ESOP held 397,242 shares of our common stock at December 31, 2000 and 448,074 shares at December 31, 1999. All shares of common stock held by the ESOP are
treated as outstanding shares in both our basic and diluted earnings per share computations. The interest rate we pay on the ESOP debt is based on 90% of the prime rate. The ESOP incurred interest expense on its debt totaling $151,000 for the year
ended December 31, 2000, $181,000 for 1999 and $290,000 for 1998. We recorded ESOP-related interest expense of $115,000 for the year ended December 31, 2000, $131,000 for 1999 and $176,000 for 1998. We recorded ESOP-related compensation expense of
$1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2000, $1.1 million for 1999 and
$908,000 for 1998. We make periodic contributions to the ESOP primarily to enable the ESOP to pay principal, interest expense and administrative costs not covered by cash dividends received by the ESOP on its unallocated shares of our common stock.
We made contributions to the ESOP on a cash basis totaling $1.2 million for both 2000 and 1999 and $639,000 for 1998.
We assumed the liability associated with a qualified, noncontributory defined benefit retirement plan in conjunction
with our acquisition of AFEH covering substantially all of AFEH’s former employees. AFEH had previously frozen the benefits provided under the plan effective January 1, 1994. Prior to that date, the benefits were based on the average of each
eligible employee’s highest five consecutive annual salaries in the ten years preceding age 65, or the employee’s termination date, if earlier. Due to the plan’s frozen status, no additional benefits were accrued in the plan after
January 1, 1994. All plan participants became fully vested in their accrued benefits on this date. We may elect to terminate the frozen plan at some point in the future according to our rights under the plan. The plan assets consist primarily of a
well-diversified portfolio of equities and fixed-income securities. It is our policy to fund the minimum amount required.
The following table illustrates the change in the plan’s projected benefit obligation for periods
indicated:
| |
|
For the Year Ended
December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year |
|
$5,089 |
|
|
$6,158 |
|
| Interest cost |
|
384 |
|
|
391 |
|
| Actuarial loss (gain) |
|
469 |
|
|
(685 |
) |
| Benefits paid |
|
(280 |
) |
|
(775 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Projected benefit obligation at end of year |
|
$5,662 |
|
|
$5,089 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table illustrates the change in the plan assets for the periods indicated:
| |
|
For the Year Ended
December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Plan assets at beginning of year |
|
$5,729 |
|
|
$5,983 |
|
| Actual return on plan assets |
|
11 |
|
|
521 |
|
| Benefits paid |
|
(280 |
) |
|
(775 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Plan assets at end of year |
|
$5,460 |
|
|
$5,729 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following table illustrates the plan’s funded status and amounts recognized in our consolidated statement of
financial condition for the periods indicated:
| |
|
For the Year Ended
December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Fair value of plan assets |
|
5,460 |
|
|
5,729 |
|
| Projected benefit obligation |
|
$5,662 |
|
|
$ 5,089 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Plan assets in excess of (less than) projected benefit obligation |
|
(202 |
) |
|
640 |
|
Unrecognized gain from past experience different than originally assumed and
from effects of changes in assumptions |
|
(98 |
) |
|
(1,153 |
) |
| Recognition of a portion of unrecognized gain |
|
— |
|
|
122 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total accrued benefit liability |
|
$ (300 |
) |
|
$ (391 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Weighted-average discount rate |
|
7.25 |
% |
|
7.50 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Expected long-term rate of return on assets |
|
8.00 |
% |
|
8.00 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 1999, $600,247 in benefit payments were distributed to plan participants. As the benefit payments were in excess
of 10% of the plan’s accumulated benefit obligation and in excess of the plan’s interest cost for the year, the payments were considered a settlement of plan liabilities under Statement No. 88. The result was an immediate recognition of a
corresponding portion of the associated unrecognized gain.
The following table illustrates components of net periodic pension benefit for the periods indicated:
| |
|
For the Year Ended
December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Interest cost on projected benefit obligation |
|
$384 |
|
|
$391 |
|
|
$ 458 |
| Assumed return on plan assets |
|
(446 |
) |
|
(446 |
) |
|
(492) |
| Net amortization of unrecognized gain |
|
(29 |
) |
|
(122 |
) |
|
(92) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net periodic pension benefit |
|
$ (91 |
) |
|
$(177 |
) |
|
$(126) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 20. Risk Management Instruments
We use risk management instruments to modify interest rate characteristics of certain assets or liabilities to hedge
against our exposure to interest rate fluctuations, reducing the effects these fluctuations might have on associated cash flows or values. During 2000, 1999 and 1998, these risk management instruments, also referred to as derivative instruments,
included interest rate exchange agreements, or “swaps”, Treasury futures contracts, forward sales contracts, and interest rate option contracts, commonly referred to as “caps” (see Note 1). Derivative financial instruments
involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk. Credit risk is defined as the possibility of sustaining a loss because other parties to the financial instrument fail to perform in accordance with the terms of the contract.
Upon adoption of Statement No. 133 as more fully discussed in Note 1, our risk management instruments are not treated as
hedge instruments and are being carried at fair value, with changes in such fair value charged or credited to earnings.
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Swaps
We were a party to swaps with a notional principal amount of $194.0 million at December 31, 2000 and $256.5 million at
December 31, 1999. All of our swaps are common “fixed-for-floating” swaps. At December 31, 2000, $144.0 million of our swaps offset variable-rate funding while $50.0 million of our swaps offset the change in fair value of a portion of our
fixed-rate franchise loans held-for-sale. At December 31, 1999, all of our interest rate swaps offset variable-rate funding. The following tables illustrate the maturities and weighted-average interest rates for swaps outstanding as of December 31,
2000 and 1999. The information is based on interest rates at December 31, 2000 and 1999. To the extent that rates change, variable interest rate information will change.
| |
|
Maturities of Derivatives Instruments At December 31, 2000
|
| |
|
2001
|
|
2002
|
|
2003
|
|
2004
|
|
2005
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
Total
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Pay fixed generic swaps: |
| Notional amount |
|
$54,000 |
|
|
$ — |
|
|
$25,000 |
|
|
$ — |
|
|
$25,000 |
|
|
$90,000 |
|
|
$194,000 |
|
Weighted-average receive rate
(3-month LIBOR) |
|
6.62 |
% |
|
— |
|
|
6.60 |
% |
|
— |
|
|
6.58 |
% |
|
6.75 |
% |
|
6.67 |
% |
Weighted-average pay rate
(fixed) |
|
7.09 |
% |
|
— |
|
|
7.27 |
% |
|
— |
|
|
6.03 |
% |
|
7.08 |
% |
|
6.97 |
% |
|
| |
| |
|
Maturities of Derivatives Instruments At December 31, 1999
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
2001
|
|
2002
|
|
2003
|
|
2004
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
Total
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Pay fixed generic swaps: |
| Notional amount |
|
$100,000 |
|
|
$54,000 |
|
|
$ — |
|
|
$25,000 |
|
|
$ — |
|
|
$77,500 |
|
|
$256,500 |
|
Weighted-average receive rate
(3-month LIBOR) |
|
6.15 |
% |
|
6.14 |
% |
|
— |
|
|
6.14 |
% |
|
— |
|
|
6.16 |
% |
|
6.15 |
% |
Weighted-average pay rate
(fixed) |
|
6.10 |
% |
|
7.09 |
% |
|
— |
|
|
7.27 |
% |
|
— |
|
|
6.07 |
% |
|
6.41 |
% |
Our outstanding swaps at December 31, 2000 and 1999 were collateralized by mortgage-backed securities with a total par
value of $9.9 million and $9.7 million, respectively. The effect of interest rate swaps utilized to offset variable-rate funding was to decrease interest expense by $212,000 for the year ended December 31, 2000 and increase interest expense by $3.1
million for 1999 and $2.4 million for 1998. In addition, we recognized a transition adjustment of $628,000 during the fourth quarter of 2000 to record our swaps at their fair value in connection with adopting Statement No. 133. Changes in the fair
value of our swaps are reported as gains or losses and are charged to earnings as incurred.
Interest Rate Caps
At December 31, 2000, we had interest rate caps with notional amounts totaling $180 million and cap rates at 7.00% and a
cap index based on either the one- or three-month LIBOR rate. These interest rate caps are used to limit our exposure to rising interest rates on our short-term debt. The effect of interest rate caps was to increase interest expense by $380,000 for
the year ended December 31, 2000. In addition, we recognized a transition adjustment of $1.5 million during the fourth quarter of 2000 to record these interest rate caps at their fair value in connection with adopting Statement No. 133. These caps
will be carried at fair value with changes in fair value reported as gains and losses charged to earnings when incurred. There were no interest rate caps in effect at December 31, 1999.
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Treasury Futures Contracts
We had open positions related to United States Treasury futures contracts with notional amounts of $154.7 million at
December 31, 2000 and $32.5 million at December 31, 1999. These contracts are used to offset fixed-rate franchise loans classified as held-for-sale. These contracts are settled daily and reported at their fair value with realized gains and losses
charged to earnings when incurred.
Forward Sale Contract
We had an open position related to the forward sale contract of a Federal National Mortgage Association agency note with
a notional amount of $70 million at December 31, 2000. This contract is used to offset fixed-rate franchise loans classified as held-for-sale. These contracts are reported at their fair value with realized gains and losses charged to earnings when
incurred. There were no forward sale contracts in effect at December 31, 1999.
Forward Sales of Mortgage-Backed Securities
In the past, we have utilized forward sales contracts of mortgage-backed securities to offset portfolios of mortgage
loans because of their historical effectiveness as a hedge. In connection with the market and interest rate volatility experienced during the third quarter of 1998, the correlation between our outstanding forward sale contracts and the underlying
portfolio of loans was disrupted, triggering the settlement of the forward sale contracts and resulting in a $940,000 recognized loss for the year ended December 31, 1998.
Note 21. Commitments and Contingencies
Premises
At December 31, 2000, we occupied 100 offices plus our administrative corporate office under operating lease
arrangements expiring at various dates through the year 2016. In most instances, these lease arrangements include options to renew or extend the lease at market rates and terms. Bay View Bank owns the property in which four of its branches and
offices are located. Rental expense was $12.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2000, $10.1 million for 1999 and $10.6 million for 1998. Sublease rental income totaled $632,000 for the year ended December 31, 2000, $584,000 for 1999 and $1.4
million for 1998.
Future minimum payments under noncancellable lease obligations, net of approximately $4.4 million in sublease rental
income from existing sublease rental arrangements through the year 2007, are summarized as follows:
| |
|
Operating Lease
Payments
|
| |
|
(Dollars in
thousands) |
| 2001 |
|
$ 9,996 |
| 2002 |
|
9,166 |
| 2003 |
|
8,457 |
| 2004 |
|
6,316 |
| 2005 |
|
5,005 |
| Thereafter |
|
19,474 |
| |
|
|
| |
|
$58,414 |
| |
|
|
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Loans
At December 31, 2000, we had outstanding commitments to originate $137.0 million in consumer loans, $52.1 million in
commercial loans and letters of credit, $11.7 million in construction loans, $5.2 million in mortgage loans, and $3.7 million in franchise loans. We had outstanding recourse and subordination contingencies relating to $37.7 million of securitized
and/or sold loans at December 31, 2000 and $2.2 billion at December 31, 1999 (see Note 7). At December 31, 1999, we had outstanding commitments to originate $9.6 million in mortgage loans, $12.4 million in construction loans, $113.4 million in
consumer loans, and $49.3 million in commercial loans.
Litigation
We are involved as plaintiff or defendant in various legal actions arising in the normal course of business. In the
opinion of management, after consultation with counsel, the resolution of these legal actions will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
Note 22. Estimated Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following disclosure of the estimated fair value of financial instruments is made in accordance with the
requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments.” Fair value estimates, methods and assumptions, set forth below for our financial instruments, are made solely to
comply with the requirements of Statement No. 107 and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes.
We have determined the estimated fair value amounts by using market information and valuation methodologies that we
consider appropriate. However, considerable judgment is required to interpret market data to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts we could realize in a current
market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts. For all of these reasons, the aggregation of the fair values presented herein does not
represent, and should not be construed to represent, our underlying value.
The following methods and assumptions have been used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument
for which it is practicable to estimate the value.
Cash and cash equivalents: This category includes cash and deposits due from depository institutions, federal
funds sold and commercial paper. The cash equivalents are readily convertible to known amounts of cash or are so near their maturity that they present insignificant risk of changes in value. For these short-term financial instruments, the carrying
amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Securities: The fair values of investment securities and mortgage-backed securities are based on published market
prices or quotes obtained from independent registered securities brokers. The fair values of retained interests in loan and lease securitizations are estimated by discounting future cash flows using a discount rate commensurate with the risks
involved.
Loans and leases: The fair value of fixed-rate and variable-rate loans and leases is based on prices for similar
loans and leases in the secondary whole loan or securitization markets or, absent this information, estimated by discounting contractual cash flows using discount rates that reflect our current pricing for loans and leases with similar credit
ratings and for the same remaining maturities. Prepayment estimates are based on historical experience and published data for similar loans and leases.
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Investments in stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco and the Federal Reserve Bank: The carrying
amounts of the investments in stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco and the Federal Reserve Bank are used as a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Deposits: The fair value of transaction accounts with no stated maturity, such as savings accounts, checking
accounts and money market accounts is equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date and is assumed to equal the carrying amount. The fair value of certificates of deposit is estimated using the rates currently offered for certificates
of deposit with similar remaining maturities. The fair value of deposits does not include the benefit that results from the lower-cost funding provided by our deposits as compared with the cost of borrowing funds in the market.
Debt and other borrowings: Rates currently available to us for debt and other borrowings with similar terms and
remaining maturities are used to estimate the fair value of existing debt, including advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco, Subordinated Notes, other borrowings, and Capital Securities. For short-term borrowings, the carrying
amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Interest rate caps: The fair value of these derivative instruments is the estimated amount that we would receive
or pay to terminate the contracts at the reporting date, taking into account current interest rates.
Interest rate swaps: The fair value of interest rate swaps is the estimated amount that we would receive or pay
to terminate the swap agreements at the reporting date, taking into account current interest rates and the current creditworthiness of the swap counterparties.
Off-balance sheet commitments: We have not estimated the fair value of off-balance sheet commitments to extend
credit. Because of the uncertainty in attempting to assess the likelihood and timing of a commitment being drawn upon, coupled with the lack of an established market for these financial instruments, we do not believe it is meaningful or practicable
to provide an estimate of fair value.
Limitations: The fair value estimates presented herein are based on pertinent information available to us as of
December 31, 2000 and 1999. Although we are not aware of any factors that would significantly affect the estimated fair value amounts, such amounts have not been comprehensively revalued for purposes of these financial statements since those dates
and, therefore, current estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the amounts presented herein.
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following table illustrates the estimated fair values of our financial instruments as of the dates
indicated:
| |
|
At December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
| |
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Financial assets |
|
|
| Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ 694,934 |
|
$ 694,934 |
|
$ 343,905 |
|
$ 343,905 |
| Investment securities |
|
33,009 |
|
33,009 |
|
59,060 |
|
58,891 |
| Mortgage-backed securities |
|
642,628 |
|
649,775 |
|
654,713 |
|
636,063 |
| Loans and leases, net |
|
3,097,001 |
|
3,107,321 |
|
4,361,493 |
|
4,361,926 |
Investment in stock of the Federal Home
Loan Bank of San Francisco |
|
40,190 |
|
40,190 |
|
77,835 |
|
77,835 |
Investment in stock of the Federal
Reserve Bank |
|
19,590 |
|
19,590 |
|
13,476 |
|
13,476 |
| Interest rate caps |
|
119 |
|
119 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
| |
| Financial liabilities Transaction accounts |
|
1,608,499 |
|
1,608,499 |
|
1,703,123 |
|
1,703,123 |
| Certificates of deposit |
|
2,137,813 |
|
2,143,649 |
|
2,026,657 |
|
2,065,993 |
Advances from the Federal Home Loan
Bank of San Francisco |
|
804,837 |
|
804,085 |
|
1,367,300 |
|
1,340,681 |
| Short-term borrowings |
|
197,375 |
|
197,375 |
|
415,421 |
|
415,421 |
| Other borrowings |
|
1,664 |
|
1,664 |
|
3,294 |
|
3,242 |
| Subordinated Notes |
|
149,567 |
|
105,077 |
|
149,502 |
|
147,275 |
| Interest rate swaps |
|
7,869 |
|
7,869 |
|
1,443 |
|
236 |
| Capital Securities |
|
90,000 |
|
61,650 |
|
90,000 |
|
90,791 |
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Note 23. Parent Company Financial Information
The following table illustrates the parent company’s condensed statements of financial condition at December 31,
2000 and 1999 and the related condensed statements of operations and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998:
Condensed Statements of Financial Condition
| |
|
At December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
ASSETS
|
|
| |
| Cash on deposit with subsidiary bank |
|
$ 10,728 |
|
$ 794 |
| Investment securities, at fair value |
|
3,950 |
|
5,393 |
| Loans held-for-sale |
|
97,508 |
|
— |
| Loans held-for-investment, net |
|
22,447 |
|
384,658 |
| Investment in and advances to subsidiaries |
|
440,447 |
|
759,505 |
| Deferred income taxes |
|
6,462 |
|
23,099 |
| Other assets |
|
21,048 |
|
24,428 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Total assets |
|
$602,590 |
|
$1,197,877 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
| |
| Short-term borrowings |
|
$ 94,134 |
|
$ 346,210 |
| Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
18,256 |
|
28,188 |
| Subordinated Notes and Senior Debentures |
|
99,567 |
|
99,501 |
| Junior Subordinated Debentures |
|
92,784 |
|
92,784 |
| Stockholders’ equity |
|
297,849 |
|
631,194 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity |
|
$602,590 |
|
$1,197,877 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Condensed Statements of Operations
| |
|
For the Year ended December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Income: |
| Dividends from subsidiaries |
|
$ 69,570 |
|
|
$89,563 |
|
|
$87,000 |
|
| Interest income |
|
24,034 |
|
|
2,887 |
|
|
2,693 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
93,604 |
|
|
92,450 |
|
|
89,693 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Expense: |
| Interest expense |
|
37,471 |
|
|
21,009 |
|
|
14,650 |
|
| Provision for loss on loans |
|
2,700 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
| General and administrative expense |
|
22,973 |
|
|
4,932 |
|
|
14,262 |
|
| Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
1,185 |
|
|
(9,441 |
) |
|
(10,713 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
64,329 |
|
|
16,500 |
|
|
18,199 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Income before undistributed net income of subsidiaries |
|
29,275 |
|
|
75,950 |
|
|
71,494 |
|
Undistributed net loss or distribution in excess of net income of
subsidiaries |
|
(355,472 |
) |
|
(46,986 |
) |
|
(48,775 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net income (loss) |
|
$(326,197 |
) |
|
$28,964 |
|
|
$22,719 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
| |
|
For the Year ended December 31,
|
| |
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
| Net income (loss) |
|
$(326,197 |
) |
|
$ 28,964 |
|
|
$ 22,719 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating
activities: |
Undistributed net loss or distribution in excess of net income of
subsidiaries |
|
355,472 |
|
|
46,986 |
|
|
48,775 |
|
| Gain on sale of loans and securities |
|
(647 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
(202 |
) |
| Decrease (increase) in other assets |
|
19,167 |
|
|
(11,631 |
) |
|
(11,380 |
) |
| (Decrease) increase in other liabilities |
|
(1,457 |
) |
|
7,996 |
|
|
8,929 |
|
| Other, net |
|
354 |
|
|
3,243 |
|
|
(3,891 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
46,692 |
|
|
75,558 |
|
|
64,950 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
Acquisition of subsidiaries, net of cash and cash equivalents (paid)
received |
|
— |
|
|
(15,453 |
) |
|
82,129 |
|
| Purchases of loans receivable |
|
— |
|
|
(374,658 |
) |
|
(10,000 |
) |
| Investment in subsidiary |
|
(39,155 |
) |
|
(29,500 |
) |
|
(2,783 |
) |
| Purchase of investment securities |
|
— |
|
|
(5,393 |
) |
|
(1,956 |
) |
| Proceeds from sale of investment securities |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
2,357 |
|
| Proceeds from sale of loans |
|
265,350 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
| Advances from (to) subsidiaries |
|
— |
|
|
69,820 |
|
|
(200,211 |
) |
| Other, net |
|
(827 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
225,368 |
|
|
(355,184 |
) |
|
(130,464 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
| (Decrease) increase in short-term borrowings |
|
(252,440 |
) |
|
346,210 |
|
|
— |
|
| Issuance of Junior Subordinated Debentures |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
92,784 |
|
| Repayment of Senior Debentures |
|
— |
|
|
(50,000 |
) |
|
— |
|
| Repurchase of common stock |
|
— |
|
|
(8,381 |
) |
|
(24,063 |
) |
| Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
94 |
|
|
498 |
|
|
3,269 |
|
| Dividends paid to stockholders |
|
(9,780 |
) |
|
(7,715 |
) |
|
(7,207 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
(262,126 |
) |
|
280,612 |
|
|
64,783 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net increase (decrease) in cash |
|
9,934 |
|
|
986 |
|
|
(731 |
) |
Cash on deposit (overdraft) with subsidiary bank at beginning of
year |
|
794 |
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
539 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cash on (overdraft) deposit with subsidiary bank at end of year |
|
$ 10,728 |
|
|
$ 794 |
|
|
($ 192 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Note 24. Segment and Related Information
We have two operating segments that we refer to as business platforms. The platforms were determined primarily based
upon the characteristics of our interest-earning assets and their respective distribution channels and reflect the way that we monitor, measure and evaluate our primary business activities. Our platforms are as follows:
A Retail Platform which is comprised of single-family real estate loans, home equity loans and lines of credit, auto
loans and leases, mortgage-backed securities and other investments, and consumer banking products and services. The Retail Platform’s revenues are derived from customers throughout the United States.
A Commercial Platform which is comprised of multi-family and commercial real estate loans, franchise loans, franchise
asset-backed securities, asset-based loans, factoring loans, commercial leases, and business banking products and services. The Commercial Platform’s revenues are derived from customers throughout the United States.
Each of our business platforms contributes to our overall profitability. We evaluate the performance of our segments
based upon contribution by platform. Contribution by platform is defined as each platform’s net interest income and noninterest income less each platform’s allocated provision for losses on loans and leases, direct general and
administrative expenses, including certain expense allocations, and other noninterest expense, including the amortization of intangible assets.
In computing net interest income by platform, the interest expense associated with our warehouse lines, which are used
primarily to fund franchise loans held-for-sale, is allocated directly to the Commercial Platform. The interest expense associated with our remaining funding sources, including the noninterest expense associated with our 9.76% Capital Securities, is
allocated to each platform on a pro-rata basis determined by the relative amount of average interest-bearing liabilities, excluding warehouse lines, that are required to fund the platform’s interest-earning assets.
The Retail Platform incurs the direct general and administrative expenses related to operating our branch network which
serves primarily to generate deposits used to fund interest-earning assets in the Retail and Commercial Platforms. A portion of these direct general and administrative expenses is allocated to the Commercial Platform based upon the relative amount
of average interest-bearing liabilities that are required to fund the platform’s interest-earning assets.
All indirect general and administrative expenses not specifically identifiable with, or allocable to, our business
platforms are included in indirect corporate overhead. Indirect corporate overhead includes both recurring items, such as our administrative and support functions, and certain special mention items, such as expenses associated with corporate-wide
process and systems re-engineering projects and third-party Year 2000 compliance-related activities.
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following tables illustrate each platform’s contribution for the periods indicated. The tables also illustrate
the reconciliation of total contribution by platform to our consolidated net income (loss) for the periods indicated. Reconciling items generally include indirect corporate overhead and income tax expense (benefit).
| |
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2000
|
| |
|
Retail
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Total
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Interest income |
|
$ 221,451 |
|
|
$ 238,741 |
|
|
$ 460,192 |
|
| Interest expense |
|
(159,331 |
) |
|
(135,421 |
) |
|
(294,752 |
) |
| Provision for losses on loans and leases |
|
(10,354 |
) |
|
(52,246 |
) |
|
(62,600 |
) |
| Noninterest income (loss)(1) |
|
90,350 |
|
|
(13,708 |
) |
|
76,642 |
|
| Direct general and administrative expenses(1) |
|
(79,856 |
) |
|
(31,547 |
) |
|
(111,403 |
) |
| Direct general and administrative expenses—FMAC loan production |
|
— |
|
|
(15,561 |
) |
|
(15,561 |
) |
| Direct general and administrative expenses—Bankers Mutual |
|
— |
|
|
(6,311 |
) |
|
(6,311 |
) |
| Allocation of branch network general and administrative expenses |
|
21,934 |
|
|
(21,934 |
) |
|
— |
|
| Restructuring charges—FMAC(1) |
|
— |
|
|
(9,213 |
) |
|
(9,213 |
) |
| Revaluation of FMAC-related assets(1) |
|
— |
|
|
(101,894 |
) |
|
(101,894 |
) |
| Leasing expenses |
|
(69,350 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
(69,350 |
) |
| Dividend expense on Capital Securities |
|
(5,148 |
) |
|
(3,841 |
) |
|
(8,989 |
) |
| Real estate owned operations, net |
|
(22 |
) |
|
(43 |
) |
|
(65 |
) |
| Amortization of intangible assets |
|
(8,768 |
) |
|
(2,390 |
) |
|
(11,158 |
) |
| Amortization of intangible assets—FMAC |
|
— |
|
|
(9,608 |
) |
|
(9,608 |
) |
| Write-off of intangible assets—FMAC(1) |
|
— |
|
|
(192,622 |
) |
|
(192,622 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Contribution by platform |
|
$ 906 |
|
|
$ (357,598 |
) |
|
(356,692 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Indirect corporate overhead(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,315 |
) |
| Income tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,810 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ (326,197 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| At December 31, 2000: |
| Interest-earning assets plus operating lease assets |
|
$2,207,366 |
|
|
$2,178,619 |
|
|
$4,385,985 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Noninterest-earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
974,946 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$5,360,931 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 1999
|
| |
|
Retail
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Total
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Interest income |
|
$ 266,007 |
|
|
$ 155,649 |
|
|
$ 421,656 |
|
| Interest expense |
|
(169,529 |
) |
|
(81,643 |
) |
|
(251,172 |
) |
| Provision for losses on loans and leases |
|
(25,558 |
) |
|
(2,753 |
) |
|
(28,311 |
) |
| Noninterest income(1) |
|
84,658 |
|
|
6,874 |
|
|
91,532 |
|
| Direct general and administrative expenses(1) |
|
(76,309 |
) |
|
(17,046 |
) |
|
(93,355 |
) |
| Direct general and administrative expenses—FMAC loan production |
|
— |
|
|
(2,395 |
) |
|
(2,395 |
) |
| Allocation of branch network general and administrative expenses |
|
13,445 |
|
|
(13,445 |
) |
|
— |
|
| Leasing expenses |
|
(40,188 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
(40,188 |
) |
| Dividend expense on Capital Securities |
|
(6,095 |
) |
|
(2,840 |
) |
|
(8,935 |
) |
| Real estate owned operations, net |
|
133 |
|
|
105 |
|
|
238 |
|
| Amortization of intangible assets |
|
(10,002 |
) |
|
(1,991 |
) |
|
(11,993 |
) |
| Amortization of intangible assets—FMAC |
|
— |
|
|
(1,694 |
) |
|
(1,694 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Contribution by platform |
|
$ 36,562 |
|
|
$ 38,821 |
|
|
75,383 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Indirect corporate overhead(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,366 |
) |
| Income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,053 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 28,964 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| At December 31, 1999: |
| Interest-earning assets plus operating lease assets |
|
$3,658,735 |
|
|
$2,219,536 |
|
|
$5,878,271 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Noninterest-earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
620,429 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$6,498,700 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
| |
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 1998
|
| |
|
Retail
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Total
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
| Interest income(1) |
|
$ 280,971 |
|
|
$ 125,392 |
|
|
$ 406,363 |
|
| Interest expense |
|
(179,725 |
) |
|
(72,037 |
) |
|
(251,762 |
) |
| Provision for losses on loans and leases |
|
(9,114 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
(9,114 |
) |
| Noninterest income |
|
30,339 |
|
|
733 |
|
|
31,072 |
|
| Direct general and administrative expenses(1) |
|
(79,867 |
) |
|
(9,501 |
) |
|
(89,368 |
) |
| Allocation of branch network general and administrative expenses |
|
10,538 |
|
|
(10,538 |
) |
|
— |
|
| Leasing expenses |
|
(7,682 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
(7,682 |
) |
| Dividend expense on Capital Securities |
|
(174 |
) |
|
(70 |
) |
|
(244 |
) |
| Real estate owned operations, net |
|
138 |
|
|
102 |
|
|
240 |
|
| Amortization of intangible assets |
|
(9,921 |
) |
|
(1,451 |
) |
|
(11,372 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Contribution by platform |
|
$ 35,503 |
|
|
$ 32,630 |
|
|
68,133 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Indirect corporate overhead(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,199 |
) |
| Income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,215 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 22,719 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| At December 31, 1998: |
| Interest-earning assets plus operating lease assets |
|
$3,853,193 |
|
|
$1,469,417 |
|
|
$5,322,610 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Noninterest-earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
273,622 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$5,596,232 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Amounts include certain special mention items which are discussed at “Interest Income”, “Noninterest
Income”, “General and Administrative Expenses” and “Amortization of Intangible Assets”. Special mention items generally include income and expense items recognized during the period that we believe are significant and/or
unusual in nature and therefore useful to you in evaluating our performance and trends. These items may or may not be nonrecurring in nature.
|
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Note 25. Selected Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited)
| |
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2000
|
| |
|
First
Quarter
|
|
Second
Quarter
|
|
Third
Quarter
|
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) |
| Interest income |
|
$114,465 |
|
$114,681 |
|
|
$ 118,423 |
|
|
$ 112,623 |
|
| Net interest income |
|
43,191 |
|
43,175 |
|
|
41,701 |
|
|
37,373 |
|
| Provision for losses on loans and leases |
|
8,000 |
|
9,500 |
|
|
13,000 |
(1) |
|
32,100 |
(1) |
| Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit) |
|
4,374 |
|
(1,126 |
) |
|
(252,616 |
)(2) |
|
(132,639 |
)(3) |
| Net income (loss) |
|
518 |
|
204 |
|
|
(234,456 |
)(2) |
|
(92,463 |
)(3) |
|
| |
| Basic earnings (loss) per share |
|
0.02 |
|
0.01 |
|
|
(7.18 |
) |
|
(2.83 |
) |
| Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
|
0.02 |
|
0.01 |
|
|
(7.18 |
) |
|
(2.83 |
) |
|
| |
| |
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 1999
|
| |
|
First
Quarter
|
|
Second
Quarter
|
|
Third
Quarter
|
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) |
| Interest income |
|
$100,021 |
|
$102,716 |
|
|
$ 104,898 |
|
|
$ 114,021 |
|
| Net interest income |
|
40,783 |
|
42,746 |
|
|
42,290 |
|
|
44,665 |
|
| Provision for losses on loans and leases |
|
5,311 |
|
6,800 |
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
9,200 |
|
| Income before income tax expense |
|
13,429 |
|
14,184 |
|
|
16,568 |
|
|
9,836 |
|
| Net income |
|
7,133 |
|
7,536 |
|
|
9,034 |
|
|
5,261 |
|
|
| |
| Basic earnings per share |
|
0.37 |
|
0.40 |
|
|
0.48 |
|
|
0.19 |
|
| Diluted earnings per share |
|
0.37 |
|
0.40 |
|
|
0.48 |
|
|
0.19 |
|
(1)
|
Includes additional provision primarily related to franchise loans.
|
(2)
|
Includes various charges associated with FMAC and the restructuring of our franchise lending division including the write-off
of goodwill, franchise lending restructuring charges and the revaluation of FMAC-related assets (see Note 3 for further discussion of our restructuring activities).
|
(3)
|
Includes additional charges relating to FMAC and the restructuring of our balance sheet as further information became
available including the additional mark-to-market adjustment on franchise loans held-for-sale, the loss on sale of franchise asset-backed securities and the loss on sale of high loan-to-value home equity loans.
|
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT
The Board of Directors
Bay View Capital Corporation:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of Bay View Capital Corporation and
subsidiaries (“the Company”) as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Bay View Capital Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2000, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ KPMG LLP
San Francisco, California
February 14, 2001
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
Directors
The following table sets forth certain information regarding each director of the Registrant.
| |
|
Shares of Common
Stock Beneficially
Owned as of
December 31, 2000
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Positions Held
|
|
Director
Since(1)
|
|
Term
to Expire
|
|
No. of
Shares(2)(3)
|
|
Percent
|
| Paula R. Collins |
|
51 |
|
Director |
|
1993 |
|
2003 |
|
68,785 |
|
0.21 |
% |
| Roger K. Easley |
|
64 |
|
Director |
|
1984 |
|
2002 |
|
93,868 |
|
0.28 |
% |
| Thomas M. Foster |
|
58 |
|
Director |
|
1993 |
|
2003 |
|
83,916 |
|
0.25 |
% |
| Robert M. Greber |
|
63 |
|
Director |
|
1996 |
|
2001 |
|
37,973 |
|
0.11 |
% |
| John R. McKean |
|
70 |
|
Chairman of the Board |
|
1984 |
|
2002 |
|
170,206 |
|
0.51 |
% |
| Angelo J. Siracusa |
|
71 |
|
Director |
|
1996 |
|
2002 |
|
40,326 |
|
0.12 |
% |
| Edward H. Sondker |
|
53 |
|
Director, President and Chief
Executive Officer |
|
1995 |
|
2001 |
|
355,043 |
|
1.06 |
% |
(1)
|
Includes service as a director of Bay View Bank, N.A., our wholly owned subsidiary.
|
(2)
|
Includes shares held directly, held in retirement accounts, held by certain members of the named individuals’ families,
or held by trusts of which the named individuals are trustees or substantial beneficiaries, with respect to which shares the named individuals may be deemed to have sole or shared voting or dispositive power. Includes for Directors Collins, Easley,
Foster, Greber, McKean and Siracusa respectively, 61,000, 71,000, 67,000, 30,000, 60,000, and 30,000 shares which are subject to stock options currently exercisable or which will become exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 2000, granted under
the 1989 Stock Option Plan. Includes for Director Sondker 322,000 shares which are subject to stock options currently exercisable or which will become exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 2000, granted under the 1995 Stock Option
Plan.
|
(3)
|
Of the shares listed for Directors Collins, Easley, Foster, Greber, McKean, and Siracusa, 7,585, 11,040, 7,916, 6,973,
30,206, and 10,226 consist of Stock Units representing deferred director fees credited as of December 31, 2000 to the respective Stock Unit Account of each director established under the Stock in Lieu of Cash Plan.
|
The business experience of each of the above directors for at least the last five years is as follows:
Ms. Collins is a principal of The WDG Companies, San Francisco, California, a real estate development firm she founded
in 1982, and Chief Executive Officer of WDG Ventures, Inc., a subsidiary of The WDG Companies.
Mr. Foster is an independent financial consultant with over 20 years of banking and financial experience. Mr. Foster was
the President of Aircraft Technical Publishers, Brisbane, California, an aircraft maintenance library services company, from February 1989 until August 1992.
Mr. Greber served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Pacific Exchange from 1995 until his
retirement in 1999. Mr. Greber is also a director of Sonic Solutions, Inc., Novato, California.
Mr. Sondker has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank since August 1995.
Previously, he was President and Chief Executive Officer of Independence One Bank of California from October 1990 until June 1995.
Mr. Siracusa is the former President of the Bay Area Council, a non-profit public policy organization, which he headed
for 24 years. Mr. Siracusa is an independent consultant in public and government affairs.
Mr. Easley is Chairman, President and CEO of Seven-Up Bottling Company of San Francisco, California.
Mr. McKean has served as Chairman of the Board of the Company since January 1994. Mr. McKean is a managing partner at
Burr, Pilger, Mayer & McKean (CPAs), San Francisco, California.
There is no family relationship among the above directors.
Executive Officers
Information concerning our executive officers is contained under the heading “Executive Officers of the
Registrant” at Item 1. “Business.”
To our knowledge, during the past five years none of the directors or executive officers named herein has been involved
in certain legal proceedings as defined in Item 401(f) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act of 1933.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our directors and executive officers, and
persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock and other equity securities of the
Company. Officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders are required by Securities and Exchange Commission regulation to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
To our knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to us and written representations
that no other reports were required, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our officers, directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners were met.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation for services in all capacities to us for the
years indicated of the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and our four other most highly compensated executive officers of the Company during fiscal 2000 (the “named officers”). Annual bonuses are shown in the year earned, although
they are not paid until March of the following year.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
| |
|
Long Term Compensation
|
| |
|
Awards
|
|
Payouts
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Annual Compensation
|
|
Restricted
Stock
Award(s)
|
|
Shares
Underlying
Options
|
|
LTIP
Payouts
$
|
|
All Other
Compensation
|
| |
Year
|
|
Salary
|
|
Bonus
|
Edward H. Sondker
President and Chief
Executive Officer |
|
2000
1999
1998 |
|
$425,000
412,500
375,000 |
|
$ —
255,000
100,000 |
|
—
—
— |
|
10,000
40,000
50,000 |
|
—
—
— |
|
$41,131(1)
17,514(1)
20,045(1) |
|
| |
John N. Buckley
Executive Vice President and
Chief Credit Officer |
|
2000
1999
1998 |
|
$215,000
200,000
175,000 |
|
$ 86,000
80,000
38,000 |
|
—
—
— |
|
25,000
15,000
7,500 |
|
—
—
— |
|
$21,521(2)
37,976(2)
17,649(2) |
|
| |
Matthew L. Carpenter
President and Chief Executive
Officer, Bay View Commercial
Finance Group |
|
2000
1999
1998 |
|
$250,000
177,083
153,750 |
|
$187,500
116,781
82,688 |
|
—
—
— |
|
25,000
5,000
7,000 |
|
—
—
— |
|
$16,917(3)
24,525(3)
25,115(3) |
|
| |
Ronald L. Reed
Executive Vice President and
Director of Management
Information Systems and Loan
Servicing |
|
2000
1999
1998 |
|
$230,000
220,000
190,000 |
|
$ 92,000
88,000
63,000 |
|
—
—
— |
|
25,000
15,000
12,500 |
|
—
—
— |
|
$31,515(4)
12,333(4)
4,337(4) |
|
| |
Douglas J. Wallis(5)
Executive Vice President,
General Counsel and Corporate
Secretary |
|
2000
1999 |
|
$235,000
56,250 |
|
$ 94,000
— |
|
—
— |
|
25,000
30,000 |
|
—
— |
|
$ 869(6)
— |
(1)
|
2000: matching contribution to Mr. Sondker’s 401(k) Plan account, $7,650; life insurance premium, $966; split dollar
life insurance premium, $1,758; excess vacation buyback, $29,972; executive physical, $785. The value of the allocation to Mr. Sondker’s Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) account for 2000 is not yet available 1999: matching
contribution to Mr. Sondker’s 401(k) Plan account, $7,200; life insurance premium, $2,592; split dollar life insurance premium, $2,145; cancellation of 30,000 options in November, 1999 in exchange for $1; allocation to Mr. Sondker’s ESOP
account, $5,576 1998: matching contribution to Mr. Sondker’s 401(k) Plan account, $5,550; life insurance premium, $120; split dollar life insurance premium, $1,941; executive physical, $2,576; allocation to Mr. Sondker’s ESOP account,
$9,858.
|
(2)
|
2000: matching contribution to Mr. Buckley’s 401(k) Plan account, $10,167; life insurance premium, $775; excess vacation
buyback, $10,579. The value of the allocation to Mr. Buckley’s ESOP account for 2000 is not yet available. 1999: matching contribution to Mr. Buckley’s 401(k) Plan account, $9,600; life insurance premium, $2,022 cancellation of 7,500
options in exchange for $20,775, allocation to Mr. Buckley’s ESOP account, $5,579 1998: matching contribution to Mr. Buckley’s 401(k) Plan account, $7,744; life insurance premium, $47; allocation to Mr. Buckley’s ESOP account,
$9,858.
|
(3)
|
2000: matching contribution to Mr. Carpenter’s 401(k) Plan account, $10,200; life insurance premium, $717; automobile
allowance, $6,000. The value of the allocation to Mr. Carpenter’s ESOP account for 2000 is not yet available 1999: matching contribution to Mr. Carpenter’s 401(k) Plan account, $9,600; life insurance premium, $1,814; automobile allowance,
$6,000, executive physical $1,535; allocation to
Mr. Carpenter’s ESOP account, $5,576. 1998: matching contribution to Mr. Carpenter’s 401(k) Plan account, $9,225; life insurance premium, $32; automobile allowance, $6,000; allocation to Mr. Carpenter’s ESOP account,
$9,858.
|
(4)
|
2000: matching contribution to Mr. Reed’s 401(k) Plan account, $5,137; life insurance premium, $852; excess vacation
buyback, $25,526. The value of the allocation to Mr. Reed’s ESOP account for 2000 is not yet available 1999: matching contribution to Mr. Reed’s 401(k) Plan account, $4,562; life insurance premium, $2,195; allocation to Mr. Reed’s
ESOP account, $5,576 1998: matching contribution to Mr. Reed’s 401(k) Plan account, $762; life insurance premium, $3,575.
|
(5)
|
Mr. Wallis joined the Company on October 1, 1999.
|
(6)
|
2000: life insurance premium, $869.
|
The following table sets forth certain information concerning grants of stock options pursuant to the 1995 Stock Option
Plan to the named officers in 2000. There were no repricings of option grants during 2000. No stock appreciation rights “SARs” were granted in 2000.
OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
| |
|
Individual Grants
|
Name
|
|
Number
Of
Shares
Underlying
Options
Granted
|
|
% of Total
Options
Granted to
Employees
in the Fiscal
Year
|
|
Per
Share
Exercise
Price
|
|
Expiration
Date
|
|
Potential Realizable
Value At Assumed
Annual Rates of Stock
Price Appreciation for
Option Term
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
5%
|
|
10%
|
| Edward H. Sondker |
|
10,000 |
|
1.21% |
|
$9.1250 |
|
5/30/10 |
|
$57,387 |
|
$145,429 |
|
| |
| John N. Buckley |
|
15,000 |
|
1.82% |
|
8.5625 |
|
3/1/10 |
|
80,774 |
|
204,696 |
| |
|
10,000 |
|
1.21% |
|
9.1250 |
|
5/30/10 |
|
57,387 |
|
145,429 |
|
| |
| Matthew L. Carpenter |
|
15,000 |
|
1.82% |
|
8.5625 |
|
3/1/10 |
|
80,774 |
|
204,696 |
| |
|
10,000 |
|
1.21% |
|
9.1250 |
|
5/30/10 |
|
57,387 |
|
145,429 |
|
| |
| Ronald L. Reed |
|
15,000 |
|
1.82% |
|
8.5625 |
|
3/1310 |
|
80,774 |
|
204,696 |
| |
|
10,000 |
|
1.21% |
|
9.1250 |
|
5/30/10 |
|
57,387 |
|
145,429 |
|
| |
| Douglas J. Wallis |
|
15,000 |
|
1.82% |
|
8.5625 |
|
3/1/10 |
|
80,774 |
|
204,696 |
| |
|
10,000 |
|
1.21% |
|
9.1250 |
|
5/30/10 |
|
57,387 |
|
145,429 |
The following table sets forth certain information concerning option exercises during the last fiscal year and the
number and value of unexercised stock options at December 31, 2000 held by the named officers. None of the named officers held any SARs at December 31, 2000 or exercised any SARs during 2000.
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN THE LAST FISCAL YEAR
AND OPTION VALUES AT DECEMBER 31, 2000
| |
Name
|
|
Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
|
|
Value
Realized
|
|
Number of Shares
Underlying Unexercised
Options at FY-End
|
|
Value of Unexercised
In-the-Money Options at
FY-End ($)(1)
|
| |
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Unexercisable
|
| Edward H. Sondker |
|
— |
|
— |
|
322,000 |
|
46,000 |
|
— |
|
— |
| John N. Buckley |
|
— |
|
— |
|
62,500 |
|
35,000 |
|
— |
|
— |
| Matthew L. Carpenter |
|
— |
|
— |
|
41,000 |
|
31,500 |
|
— |
|
— |
| Ronald L. Reed |
|
— |
|
— |
|
35,500 |
|
37,000 |
|
— |
|
— |
| Douglas J. Wallis |
|
— |
|
— |
|
9,000 |
|
46,000 |
|
— |
|
— |
(1)
|
All option exercise prices exceeded the fair market value of $6.25 of the underlying shares at December 31, 2000,
consequently, there were no in-the-money options at that time.
|
Board of Directors Meetings, Committees and Compensation
Meetings
Meetings of our Board of Directors are generally held monthly. The Board of Directors of the Company held ten meetings
during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000. During 2000, no director of the Company attended fewer than 75% of the total number of meetings held by the Company’s Board of Directors held while he or she was a director and by all committees
of the Board of Directors of the Company on which he or she served during the period that he or she served.
Fees
The directors’ fees for non-employee directors, other than the Chairman of the Board, were as follows: a monthly
retainer of $2,000 if the person is a director of Bay View Capital Corporation but not Bay View Bank, and a monthly retainer of $2,500 if the person is a director of both Bay View Capital Corporation and Bay View Bank; a fee of $1,500 per board
meeting attended, or $1,000 in the case of telephonic meetings attended; and a fee of $1,000 per committee meeting attended, or $500 in the case of telephonic meetings attended, plus $500 per committee meeting for the Chairman of the Audit Committee
and $250 per committee meeting for the Chairman of each other committee. No fee is paid for attendance at any committee meeting held on the same day as a board meeting, except that committee Chairman fees are paid regardless of whether the committee
meeting is held on the same day as a Board meeting. Directors Collins and Foster receive the same attendance fees for attending meetings of Bay View Bank’s Board of Directors. Mr. McKean, the Chairman of the Board, was paid a director’s
retainer of $2,500 per month, plus a chairman’s retainer of $5,000 per month and he receives $1,500 per board meeting attended, or $1,000 in the case of telephonic meetings attended. He also receives $1,000 per Bay View Capital Corporation or
Bay View Bank Committee meeting attended, or $500 in the case of telephonic committee meetings attended. Only one fee for attendance at Board meetings of the Bank and the Company is paid when meetings of Bay View Bank and Bay View Capital
Corporation Boards are held on the same day.
Stock Option Awards
On January 28, 2000, options to purchase 5,000 shares of Bay View Capital Corporation common stock at the exercise price
of $9.97 were granted to each of the non-employee Directors. The options became exercisable in full on January 28, 2000, and will expire on January 28, 2010.
Information regarding stock options granted to Director Sondker, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, is contained in the table captioned “Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year.”
Stock in Lieu of Cash Compensation Plan
In 1996, we adopted the Stock in Lieu of Cash Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the “Stock in Lieu of
Cash Plan”). The Stock in Lieu of Cash Plan provides for the deferral of director fees earned by non-employee directors in the form of Stock Units (“Stock Units”), which are credited to accounts maintained for the non-employee
directors (“Stock Unit Accounts”). At least 20% of the fees paid to non-employee directors must be converted into Stock Units, and non-employee directors may elect to have up to 100% of their fees converted. The number of Stock Units per
fee deferral is determined by dividing the amount of fees deferred by the fair market value per share of the Company common stock on the deferral date.
Each non-employee director has credited to his or her Stock Unit Account an additional number of Stock Units to reflect
cash dividends paid with respect to our common stock. The number of Stock Units is determined by multiplying the amount of the dividend per share by the number of Stock Units held in the non-employee director’s Stock Unit Account on the
dividend record date. Each Stock Unit Account will be settled as soon as practicable following the non-employee director’s termination of service as a director, for any reason, by delivering to the non-employee director (or his beneficiary) the
number of shares of our common stock equal to
the number of whole Stock Units then credited to the non-employee director’s Stock Unit Account. The non-employee director may elect to have such shares delivered in substantially equal annual installments over a period not to exceed ten years;
in the absence of such an election, all of such shares will be delivered on the settlement date. During the year ended December 31, 2000, we distributed 5,253 shares of our common stock under the Stock in Lieu of Cash Plan to two individuals who
resigned from service as directors.
Amended Outside Directors Retirement Plan.
Bay View Bank maintains the Amended Outside Directors Retirement Plan (the “Retirement Plan”) for non-employee
directors who retire from Bay View Bank’s Board of Directors with at least three years of service on the Board and who were elected to the Bank’s Board of Directors prior to 1996. Only Directors McKean, Collins, Easley and Foster are
eligible participants in the Retirement Plan. Pursuant to the Retirement Plan, the present values of the vested accrued benefits as of May 23, 1996 of each participant were contributed by Bay View Bank in cash to a grantor trust administered by a
third-party trustee. The cash was then invested by the trustee in shares of our common stock purchased on the open market, which have been allocated to accounts maintained by the trustee for the Retirement Plan participants.
The Retirement Plan provides that, in general, upon the termination of a participant’s service as a director of Bay
View Bank (and Bay View Capital Corporation, if the participant also serves as a director) prior to a change in control, the shares of our common stock allocated to the participant’s account will be distributed in ten installments, with the
first installment being made within 30 days after termination of service and each subsequent installment being made annually thereafter (the “normal form of payment”). A participant may elect, within 15 days after termination of service,
to instead have the shares of stock allocated to his account sold by the trustee and receive the proceeds in cash, paid in ten installments, with the first installment being paid within 30 days after termination of service and each subsequent
installment being paid annually thereafter (the “cash installment form of payment”). The cash proceeds not immediately distributed would be invested in permissible investments with the participant entitled to any earnings on such
investments up to a specified amount. If a participant’s service is terminated in connection with or after a change in control, the participant will automatically receive the cash installment form of payment, unless the Board of Directors of
the Bank determines prior to the change in control to require the trustee to make a single, lump-sum cash payment of the value of each participant’s account balance immediately after such a termination of service. A participant whose service
terminates before a change in control and who begins receiving the normal form of payment will, in the event of a change of control, thereafter receive the cash installment form of payment for the remaining value of his or her account.
Committees
Set forth below is information regarding the Audit, Compensation and Benefits and Nominating Committees. There is also a
Stock Option Committee, the members of which are Directors Collins, Greber and McKean.
The Audit Committee reviews audit and regulatory reports and related matters to ensure effective compliance with
regulatory and internal policies and procedures. Directors McKean, Collins and Foster are members of this Committee. The Committee held eight meetings during 2000.
The Compensation and Benefits Committee is responsible for review and recommendations for approval by the Board of
senior officers’ salaries, other compensation and benefit programs and Board of Directors and committee fees. The current members of the Compensation and Benefits Committee are Directors Collins, Greber and McKean. The Committee held four
meetings during 2000.
The Nominating Committee of the Company is responsible for nominating persons to serve on the Board of Directors and as
Chairman of the Board. Directors Foster, McKean and Sondker are members of this Committee. The Committee did not meet during 2000. While the Nominating Committee will consider nominees recommended by stockholders, the Committee has not actively
solicited such nominations. Pursuant to our
Bylaws, nominations by stockholders must be delivered in writing to the Secretary of Bay View Capital Corporation not less than 60 nor more than 90 days before the date of the annual meeting, except that if less than 70 days’ notice or prior
disclosure of the date of the meeting is given or made to stockholders, nominations must be delivered no later than the close of business on the tenth day following the earlier of the day on which notice of the date of the meeting is mailed or
public disclosure of the date of the meeting is made.
Employment Contracts
We have employment agreements with each of the named officers. Each agreement provides for an initial term of one year
with automatic renewal for an additional year on each December 31 unless Bay View Capital Corporation or the executive gives prior written notice that the agreement is not to be renewed. At January 1, 2000, the agreements provided for the payment of
base salary as follows: Mr. Sondker, $425,000 per annum; Mr. Buckley, $215,000 per annum; Mr. Carpenter, $185,000 per annum; Mr. Reed, $230,000 per annum and
Mr. Wallis, $225,000 per annum. The agreements provide for base salary review on July 1 of each year. All of the contracts provide that salary increases are not guaranteed or automatic. The contracts also provide for participation in an equitable
manner in employee benefits applicable to executive personnel. In the event of termination without cause, other than within 24 months after a change in control of Bay View Capital Corporation, the executive would be entitled to receive a lump sum
severance payment of 18 months’ salary. Upon a change in control followed within 24 months by the involuntary termination of an executive (including the executive’s relocation or a reduction in benefits or responsibilities) without cause,
the executive would be entitled to a lump sum severance payment of 200% of annual salary plus target bonus.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Compensation and Benefits Committee of the Board of Directors has furnished the following report on executive
compensation:
Compensation Philosophy Regarding Executive Officers
The Compensation and Benefits Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors is responsible for
supervising and approving the compensation and benefits of the executive officers of Bay View Capital Corporation, (“the Company”). The Committee seeks to ensure that the compensation of senior executives is consistent with the overall
performance goals of the Company. In executing its responsibilities, the Committee considers the three components of compensation for executive officers: (1) base salary; (2) annual incentives; and (3) long-term incentives. The underlying goal of
corporate compensation is to tie the executive’s compensation to performance of the Company as a whole, and to achievement of individual objectives. This goal is implemented by weighing the two variable compensation components, namely, annual
and long term incentives, more heavily than base salary. Compensation levels for base salary are intended to be competitive at the market median. Executives can attain total compensation at above market levels by accomplishing their individual goals
at the same time that the Company has achieved stated corporate goals.
In 2000, the Committee retained the services of Strategic Compensation Associates (“SCA”), an independent
compensation consulting firm, to competitively assess the Company’s executive compensation programs and make appropriate recommendations in accordance with the Committee’s pay-for-performance philosophy. SCA compiled a composite group of
peer institutions and analyzed peer group compensation data from proxy statements, financial data, annual reports and published surveys; pay data was appropriately adjusted to compare with the Company’s size. SCA derived market consensus levels
of total compensation for each executive position of the Company based on experience, responsibilities and scope of duties, and made recommendations as to appropriate base salary and target annual and long-term incentive compensation levels. Based
on SCA’s recommendations, the Committee made certain changes to existing salary levels for executive officers of the Company in July 2000, such that base salaries were generally set at market consensus levels for each position, with the
exception of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, whose base compensation remained unchanged from the prior year and was below the market consensus level. The Chairman of the Board of each of the respective subsidiaries made determinations
for salary levels for executive officers of those subsidiaries, also based on peer data comparison provided by SCA. Ranges for target long-term compensation for each executive position were also established by the Committee based on SCA’s
recommendations.
Incentive and bonus programs for executive officers have been utilized by the Company for many years. Annual incentive
plans for the executive officers measure performance based upon (1) the creation of shareholder value as reflected in certain financial measurements, (2) business unit performance; and (3) individual performance, as measured against goals and
objectives in the Company’s business plan. The annual incentive plans for executive officers have required that certain thresholds of corporate performance and regulatory ratings be met prior to an executive being entitled to an incentive
payment.
The 2000 Annual Senior Management Incentive Plan (the “2000 Plan”) for the executive officers of the Company
and Bay View Bank contained certain corporate goals which were required to be met prior to any officer becoming eligible for a bonus. These thresholds were cash earnings of the Company and regulatory examination results, including a satisfactory
Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) rating. In June 2000, after the decision by the Board of Directors to explore strategic options including a possible sale of all or part of the Company, the Committee determined that, in light of the
Board’s decision to pursue a different strategic direction of the Company, the previously established performance measures no longer represented the strategy of the Company. The Committee determined that it was in the best interests of the
Company to retain the officers of the Company during this critical period and to have them focus on the new strategic direction of the Company. The Committee therefore acted to eliminate the corporate performance measure of the 2000 Plan and to use
attainment of business unit and individual performance measures as the basis for eligibility for payment under
the plans. To further retain the executives of the Company, the Committee approved amending the 2000 Plan to provide that, to receive a payment under the 2000 Plan, the executive must be employed by the Company on the date of payment in March 2001
rather than on the last day of the performance period (the calendar year). Production subsidiary units were required to meet performance targets based on production levels, asset quality and expense control, and such goals were exceeded by Bay View
Commercial Finance Group. Consequently, the named officers were entitled to payments under the 2000 Plan as follows: Mr. Sondker, $0; Mr. Buckley, $68,800; Mr. Carpenter, $187,500; Mr. Reed, $92,000; and Mr. Wallis, $94,000. Mr. Buckley received an
additional discretionary bonus award of $17,200 in recognition of the need to retain him through the performance period. The bonus payments to the named officers totaled $459,300.
In January 1998, the Committee approved a long-term incentive plan (the “Performance Stock Plan”) designed by
SCA to complement the Company’s existing stock option program through which awards are contingent on the achievement of specific performance measures as set forth in the Performance Stock Plan. The Performance Stock Plan was submitted to and
approved by the Company’s shareholders at the May 1998 annual stockholders’ meeting. In December 1998, the Committee approved a Supplemental Phantom Stock Unit Plan (the “Supplemental Plan”), which was ratified by the Board in
January 1999 (the Performance Stock Plan and the Supplemental Plan are referred to collectively as the “Long-term Incentive Plan”). No awards were made in 2000 to any participant in the Performance Stock Plan and the Supplemental Plan, as
target performance measures were not achieved. The Performance Stock Plan and the Supplemental Plan expired on December 31, 2000.
The Committee considers the grant of stock options to executive officers to be an important component of long-term
compensation. In 2000, options were granted to the named executive officers other than pursuant to the Performance Stock Plan as follows: Mr. Sondker, 10,000 shares; Mr. Buckley, 25,000 shares; Mr. Carpenter, 25,000 shares; Mr. Reed, 25,000 shares;
and Mr. Wallis, 25,000 shares. The grants were based on the Committee’s recognition of the leadership skills of the named individuals and the importance of retaining the named individuals because of their impact on the future success of the
Company. During 1997, the Company established a split-dollar life insurance policy for Mr. Sondker. The policy was funded by the tax-free conversion of the cash surrender value of an existing policy that no longer served a valid purpose. The new
policy is owned by the executive but provide for an assignment back to the Company of the amount contributed by the Company. The assignment would be terminated upon a change in control of the Company.
CEO Compensation
Edward H. Sondker commenced employment as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer on August 1, 1995.
Mr. Sondker’s base salary was set at $425,000 effective July 1, 1999, as a result of recommendations made by SCA and in accordance with the Committee’s philosophy of setting base salary at peer market average for a comparable position. Mr.
Sondker’s base salary was not adjusted during 2000. Mr. Sondker’s total compensation package includes: (1) the aforementioned base salary; (2) annual incentive target award of up to 60% of annual base salary based upon achievement of
agreed-upon 2000 performance goals; (3) long-term compensation consisting of options to purchase 368,000 shares of Bay View common stock (representing cumulative grants since his date of hire) vesting over three years; (4) PSUs and options, if
earned, under the Long-term Incentive Plan (5) the split-dollar life insurance policy described above; and (6) a one year employment contract. Mr. Sondker did not receive an annual incentive award payment for 2000. On January 1, 2000, Mr.
Sondker’s employment agreement (described elsewhere in this Proxy Statement) was renewed for an additional one-year term. On February 14, 2001 Mr. Sondker announced his resignation from his position as President and Chief Executive Officer and
the termination of his contract upon the Board’s identification of his successor.
The foregoing report is furnished by Ms. Collins, (Chairperson), and Messrs. McKean and Greber. There were no
Compensation Committee Interlocks as defined in Item 402(k) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act of 1933.
Stockholder Return Performance Presentation
The line graph below compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock to the cumulative total return
of the Dow Jones Banks Index and the Dow Jones U.S. Total Market Index for the period December 31, 1995 through December 31, 2000. The graph assumes that $100 was invested on December 31, 1995 and that all dividends were reinvested.
CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION,
DOW JONES BANKS INDEX AND DOW JONES U.S. TOTAL MARKET INDEX
| |
|
12/31/95
|
|
12/31/96
|
|
12/31/97
|
|
12/31/98
|
|
12/31/99
|
|
12/31/00
|
| Bay View Capital |
|
100 |
|
151 |
|
263 |
|
160 |
|
107 |
|
49 |
| Dow Jones Banks Index |
|
100 |
|
139 |
|
209 |
|
222 |
|
195 |
|
230 |
| Dow Jones US Total Market Index |
|
100 |
|
122 |
|
161 |
|
201 |
|
247 |
|
224 |
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2000, certain information as to (i) those persons we knew to be
beneficial owners of more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock, (ii) the shares of common stock beneficially owned by the executive officers named below and (iii) the shares of common stock beneficially owned by all directors and
executive officers as a group. Certain information as to the shares of common stock beneficially owned by our directors is included in Item 10. “Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant”.
| |
|
Shares of Common Stock
Beneficially Owned as
of December 31, 2000
|
Beneficial Owner
|
|
No. of
Shares
|
|
Percent
|
| Southeastern Asset Management, Inc. |
|
6,345,230 |
(1) |
|
18.93 |
% |
6410 Poplar Avenue, Suite 900
Memphis, Tennessee 38119 |
|
| |
| Wayne L. Knyal |
|
3,237,742 |
(2) |
|
9.66 |
% |
|
| |
| Dimensional Fund Advisors, Inc. |
|
1,933,801 |
(3) |
|
5.77 |
% |
1299 Ocean Avenue, 11th Floor
Santa Monica, California 90401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Edward H. Sondker |
|
355,043 |
(4) |
|
1.06 |
% |
|
| |
| John N. Buckley |
|
71,145 |
(4) |
|
0.21 |
% |
|
| |
| Matthew L. Carpenter |
|
42,848 |
(4) |
|
0.13 |
% |
|
| |
| Ronald L. Reed |
|
42,243 |
(4) |
|
0.13 |
% |
|
| |
| Douglas J. Wallis |
|
13,606 |
(4) |
|
0.04 |
% |
|
| |
| All directors and executive officers as a group (15 persons) |
|
1,184,795 |
(4) |
|
3.53 |
% |
(1)
|
As reported by Southeastern Asset Management, Inc. (“Southeastern”), a registered investment advisor, Longleaf
Partners Realty Fund (“Longleaf Realty”), Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (“Longleaf Small-Cap”) and Mr. O. Mason Hawkins, as of December 31, 2000 on Amendment No. 6 to a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Longleaf Realty and Longleaf Small-Cap are series of Longleaf Partners Funds Trust, an open-end management investment company (“Longleaf Trust”). Southeastern serves as investment advisor for Longleaf Trust. Southeastern
reported sole voting power as to 889,883 shares, sole dispositive power as to 979,883 shares and shared voting and dispositive powers as to 5,365,347 shares. Longleaf Realty reported sole voting and dispositive powers as to no shares and shared
voting and dispositive powers as to 2,250,647 shares. Longleaf Small-Cap reported sole voting and dispositive powers as to no shares and shared voting and dispositive powers as to 3,114,700 shares. Mr. Hawkins, the Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of Southeastern, may also be deemed to beneficially own the 6,345,230 shares beneficially owned by Southeastern. Mr. Hawkins disclaims beneficial ownership of all such shares.
|
(2)
|
Shares are held by FLRT, Inc., a closely held company, 100% of which is owned by Mr. Knyal and his immediate family as last
reported in August 2000.
|
(3)
|
As reported by Dimensional Fund Advisors, Inc. (“DFA”), a registered investment advisor, as of December 31, 2000,
on a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. DFA reported sole voting power as to all 1,933,801 shares.
|
(4)
|
Includes shares held directly, held in retirement accounts, held by certain members of the named individuals’ families,
or held by trusts of which the named individuals are trustees or substantial beneficiaries, with respect to which shares the named individuals may be deemed to have sole or shared voting or dispositive power. Includes for Messrs. Sondker, Buckley,
Carpenter, Reed, and Wallis, and all directors and executive officers as a group respectively, 322,000, 62,500, 41,000, 35,500, 9,000, and 947,500 shares which are
subject to options currently exercisable or which will become exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 2000, granted under one or more of the Company’s Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “1995 Stock Option
Plan”), Amended and Restated 1986 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “1986 Stock Option Plan”), 1998-2000 Performance Stock Plan, and Amended and Restated 1989 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (the “1989 Stock Option
Plan”). Also includes a total of 73,946 Stock Units representing deferred director fees credited as of December 31, 2000 to the Stock Unit Accounts of non-employee directors established under the Company’s and the Bank’s Stock In Lieu
of Cash Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the “Stock in Lieu of Cash Plan”). For additional information regarding the Stock in Lieu of Cash Plan, see Item 12. “Executive Compensation—Board of Directors Meetings,
Committees and Compensation—Stock in Lieu of Cash Compensation Plan.”
|
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
We do not make loans to directors and executive officers.
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) (1) and (2):
Our Financial Statements and Supplementary Data contained in Item 8 are filed as part of this report. All financial
statement schedules have been omitted as the required information is not applicable or has been included in our financial statements and related notes.
(a) (3):
Exhibits are listed in the table below.
Regulation
S-K
Exhibit
Number
|
|
Document
|
|
Reference to prior
filing or exhibit
number attached
hereto
|
| 2 |
|
Plan of acquisition, reorganization, arrangement, liquidation or succession |
|
None |
|
| |
| 3 |
|
Articles of Incorporation |
|
3a |
| |
|
Bylaws |
|
3b |
|
| |
| 4 |
|
Instruments defining the rights of security holders, including indentures: |
|
|
| |
|
Articles of Incorporation |
|
3a |
| |
|
Bylaws |
|
3b |
| |
|
Specimen of common stock certificate |
|
4a |
|
| |
| 9 |
|
Voting trust agreement |
|
None |
|
| |
| 10 |
|
Material contracts: |
|
|
| |
|
Employment Contract with Richard E. Arnold |
|
10a |
| |
|
Employment Contract with James A. Badame |
|
10.1 |
| |
|
Employment Contract with John N. Buckley |
|
10a |
| |
|
Employment Contract with Ronald L. Reed |
|
10a |
| |
|
Employment Contract with Edward H. Sondker |
|
10a |
| |
|
Employment Contract with Carolyn Williams-Goldman |
|
10a |
| |
|
Employment Contract with Matthew L. Carpenter |
|
10b |
| |
|
Employment Contract with Douglas J. Wallis |
|
10b |
| |
|
Employment Contract with Mark E. Lefanowicz |
|
10c |
| |
|
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan |
|
10d |
| |
|
Senior Management Incentive Plan |
|
10e |
| |
|
Senior Management Long-Term Incentive Plan |
|
10f |
| |
|
Amended and Restated 1986 Stock Option and Incentive Plan |
|
10g |
| |
|
Amendment No. One to the 1986 Stock Option and Incentive Plan |
|
10h |
| |
|
Amended and Restated 1989 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan |
|
10i |
| |
|
Amended Outside Directors’ Retirement Plan |
|
10j |
| |
|
Stock in Lieu of Cash Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors |
|
10j |
| |
|
Deferred Compensation Plan |
|
10j |
| |
|
Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Option and Incentive Plan |
|
10k |
| |
|
Amendment No. One to the Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Option and
Incentive Plan |
|
10h |
| |
|
Amendment No. Two to the Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Option and
Incentive Plan |
|
10h |
| |
|
1998—2000 Stock Performance Plan |
|
10l |
| |
|
1998 Non-Employee Director Stock Option and Incentive Plan |
|
10l |
| |
|
Supplemental Phantom Stock Unit Plan |
|
10m |
| |
|
Agreement by and between Bay View Capital and the Federal Reserve Bank |
|
10n |
Regulation
S-K
Exhibit
Number
|
|
Document
|
|
Reference to prior
filing or exhibit
number attached
hereto
|
| |
|
Agreement by and between Bay View Bank and the Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency |
|
10n |
|
| |
| 11 |
|
Statement re computation of per share earnings |
|
11 |
|
| |
| 12 |
|
Statements re computation of ratios |
|
12 |
|
| |
| 13 |
|
Annual Report to security holders |
|
Not required |
|
| |
| 16 |
|
Letter re change in certifying accountant |
|
Not required |
|
| |
| 18 |
|
Letter re change in accounting principles |
|
None |
|
| |
| 21 |
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant |
|
21 |
|
| |
| 22 |
|
Published report regarding matters submitted to vote of security holders |
|
None |
|
| |
| 23 |
|
Consent of KPMG LLP |
|
23 |
|
| |
| 24 |
|
Power of attorney |
|
Not required |
|
| |
| 99 |
|
Additional Exhibits |
|
99 |
(References to Prior Filings)
| 3a |
|
Filed as exhibit 4(a) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed June 20, 1997 (File
No. 333-29757) |
|
| |
| 3b |
|
Filed as exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 12, 1999 for
the quarterly period ended September 30, 1999 (File No. 0-14879) |
|
| |
| 4a |
|
Filed as exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 24, 2000 for the year
ended December 31, 1999 (File No. 0-14879) |
|
| |
| 10a |
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 16, 1998 for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 1998 (File No. 0-17901) |
|
| |
| 10b |
|
Filed as exhibits 10.1 to 10.3, respectively, to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed
March 24, 2000 for the year ended December 31, 1999 (File No. 0-17901) |
|
| |
| 10c |
|
Filed as exhibit 10 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 3, 2000 for the
quarter ended June 30, 2000 (File No. 0-14879) |
|
| |
| 10d-f |
|
Filed as exhibits 10.6 to 10.8, respectively, to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed
March 30, 1993 for the year ended December 31, 1992 (File No. 0-17901) |
|
| |
| 10g |
|
Filed as exhibit 4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed August 11, 1995 (File
No. 33-95724) |
|
| |
| 10h |
|
Filed as exhibits 10 to 10.2, respectively, to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed
November 12, 1999 for the quarterly period ended September 30, 1999 (File No. 0-14879) |
|
| |
| 10i |
|
Filed as exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed July 26, 1991 (File
No. 33-41924) |
|
| |
| 10j |
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1996, as amended on Form 10-K/A on June 27, 1997 (File No. 0-17901) |
|
| |
| 10k |
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1996, as amended on Form 10-K/A on June 27, 1997 (File No. 0-17901) |
|
| |
| 10l |
|
Filed as an appendix to the Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14-A filed April 20,
1998 (File No. 0-17901) |
|
| |
| 10m |
|
Filed as exhibit10.4 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 24, 2000 for the
year ended December 31, 1999 (File No. 0-14879) |
|
| |
| 10n |
|
Filed as exhibits 10.1 to 10.2, respectively, to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed
November 10, 2000 for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2000 (File No. 0-14879) |
All of such previously filed documents are hereby incorporated herein by reference in accordance with Item 601 of
Regulation S-K.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K:
b(i) The Registrant filed the following report on Form 8-K dated October 3, 2000 during the three months
ended December 31, 2000:
|
On September 29, 2000, we issued a press release announcing the deferral of distributions on our Capital Securities. On
October 2, 2000, we issued a press release confirming that the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco had denied our request for approval to pay the September 30, 2000 dividend on our Capital Securities.
|
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: March 27, 2001
|
BAY VIEW CAPITAL CORPORATION
|
|
Executive Vice President and
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
Senior Vice President and Controller
|
|
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following
persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| /s/ JOHN
R. MC
KEAN
By:
John R. McKean
Chairman of the Board
|
|
/s/ EDWARD
H. SONDKER
By:
Edward H. Sondker, Director
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
| March 27, 2001
|
|
March 27, 2001
|
|
| /s/ PAULA
R. COLLINS
By:
Paula R. Collins, Director
|
|
/s/ ROBERT
M. GREBER
By:
Robert M. Greber, Director
|
|
| March 27, 2001
|
|
March 27, 2001
|
|
| /s/ ROGER
K. EASLEY
By:
Roger K. Easley, Director
|
|
/s/ ANGELO
J. SIRACUSA
By:
Angelo J. Siracusa, Director
|
|
| March 27, 2001
|
|
March 27, 2001
|
|
| /s/ THOMAS
M. FOSTER
By:
Thomas M. Foster, Director
March 27, 2001
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
Number
|
|
Document
|
|
Reference to prior
filing or exhibit
number attached
hereto
|
| 2 |
|
Plan of acquisition, reorganization, arrangement, liquidation or succession |
|
None |
|
| |
| 3 |
|
Articles of Incorporation |
|
3a |
| |
|
Bylaws |
|
3b |
|
| |
| 4 |
|
Instruments defining the rights of security holders, including indentures: |
|
|
| |
|
Articles of Incorporation |
|
3a |
| |
|
Bylaws |
|
3b |
| |
|
Specimen of common stock certificate |
|
4a |
|
| |
| 9 |
|
Voting trust agreement |
|
None |
|
| |
| 10 |
|
Material contracts: |
|
|
| |
|
Employment Contract with Richard E. Arnold |
|
10a |
| |
|
Employment Contract with James A. Badame |
|
10.1 |
| |
|
Employment Contract with John N. Buckley |
|
10a |
| |
|
Employment Contract with Ronald L. Reed |
|
10a |
| |
|
Employment Contract with Edward H. Sondker |
|
10a |
| |
|
Employment Contract with Carolyn Williams-Goldman |
|
10a |
| |
|
Employment Contract with Matthew L. Carpenter |
|
10b |
| |
|
Employment Contract with Douglas J. Wallis |
|
10b |
| |
|
Employment Contract with Mark E. Lefanowicz |
|
10c |
| |
|
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan |
|
10d |
| |
|
Senior Management Incentive Plan |
|
10e |
| |
|
Senior Management Long-Term Incentive Plan |
|
10f |
| |
|
Amended and Restated 1986 Stock Option and Incentive Plan |
|
10g |
| |
|
Amendment No. One to the 1986 Stock Option and Incentive Plan |
|
10h |
| |
|
Amended and Restated 1989 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan |
|
’10i |
| |
|
Amended Outside Directors’ Retirement Plan |
|
10j |
| |
|
Stock in Lieu of Cash Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors |
|
10j |
| |
|
Deferred Compensation Plan |
|
10j |
| |
|
Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Option and Incentive Plan |
|
10k |
| |
|
Amendment No. One to the Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Option and
Incentive Plan |
|
10h |
| |
|
Amendment No. Two to the Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Option and
Incentive Plan |
|
10h |
| |
|
1998—2000 Stock Performance Plan |
|
10l |
| |
|
1998 Non-Employee Director Stock Option and Incentive Plan |
|
10l |
| |
|
Supplemental Phantom Stock Unit Plan |
|
10m |
| |
|
Agreement by and between Bay View Capital and the Federal Reserve Bank |
|
10n |
| |
|
Agreement by and between Bay View Bank the Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency |
|
10n |
|
| |
| 11 |
|
Statement re computation of per share earnings |
|
11 |
|
| |
| 12 |
|
Statements re computation of ratios |
|
12 |
|
| |
| 13 |
|
Annual Report to security holders |
|
Not required |
|
| |
| 16 |
|
Letter re change in certifying accountant |
|
Not required |
|
| |
| 18 |
|
Letter re change in accounting principles |
|
None |
|
| |
| 21 |
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant |
|
21 |
|
| |
| 22 |
|
Published report regarding matters submitted to vote of security holders |
|
None |
|
| |
| 23 |
|
Consent of KPMG LLP |
|
23 |
Exhibit
Number
|
|
Document
|
|
Reference to prior
filing or exhibit
number attached
hereto
|
| 24 |
|
Power of attorney |
|
Not required |
|
| |
| 99 |
|
Additional Exhibits |
|
99 |
(References to Prior Filings)
| 3a |
|
Filed as exhibit 4(a) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed June 20, 1997 (File
No. 333-29757) |
|
| |
| 3b |
|
Filed as exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 12, 1999 for
the quarterly period ended September 30, 1999 (File No. 0-14879) |
|
| |
| 4a |
|
Filed as exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 24, 2000 for the year
ended December 31, 1999 (File No. 0-14879) |
|
| |
| 10a |
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 16, 1998 for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 1998 (File No. 0-17901) |
|
| |
| 10b |
|
Filed as exhibits 10.1 to 10.3, respectively, to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed
March 24, 2000 for the year ended December 31, 1999 (File No. 0-17901) |
|
| |
| 10c |
|
Filed as exhibit 10 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 3, 2000 for the
quarter ended June 30, 2000 (File No. 0-14879) |
|
| |
| 10d-f |
|
Filed as exhibits 10.6 to 10.8, respectively, to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed
March 30, 1993 for the year ended December 31, 1992 (File No. 0-17901) |
|
| |
| 10g |
|
Filed as exhibit 4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed August 11, 1995 (File
No. 33-95724) |
|
| |
| 10h |
|
Filed as exhibits 10 to 10.2, respectively, to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed
November 12, 1999 for the quarterly period ended September 30, 1999 (File No. 0-14879) |
|
| |
| 10i |
|
Filed as exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed July 26, 1991 (File
No. 33-41924) |
|
| |
| 10j |
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1996, as amended on Form 10-K/A on June 27, 1997 (File No. 0-17901) |
|
| |
| 10k |
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1996, as amended on Form 10-K/A on June 27, 1997 (File No. 0-17901) |
|
| |
| 10l |
|
Filed as an appendix to the Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14-A filed April 20,
1998 (File No. 0-17901) |
|
| |
| 10m |
|
Filed as exhibit10.4 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 24, 2000 for the
year ended December 31, 1999 (File No. 0-14879) |
|
| |
| 10n |
|
Filed as exhibits 10.1 to 10.2, respectively, to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed
November 10, 2000 for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2000 (File No. 0-14879) |
All of such previously filed documents are hereby incorporated herein by reference in accordance with Item 601 of
Regulation S-K.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K:
b(i) The Registrant filed the following report on Form 8-K dated October 3, 2000 during the three months
ended December 31, 2000:
|
On September 29, 2000, we issued a press release announcing the deferral of distributions on our Capital Securities. On
October 2, 2000, we issued a press release confirming that the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco had denied our request for approval to pay the September 30, 2000 dividend on our Capital Securities.
|
