Back to GetFilings.com



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

___________________________________

FORM 10-K

x
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999

¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from______ to ______

Commission File Number 33-45123

C.M. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

Incorporated under the laws
 

IRS Employer

 
of the State of Connecticut
 
Identification No. 06-1040383
 

140 Garden Street, Hartford, Connecticut 06154

Telephone Number: Area Code 860-987-6500

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

___________________________________

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

(1) Yes X   No __

(2) Yes X   No __

Registrant has 12,500 shares of common stock outstanding on March 28, 2000, all of which are owned by Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company.

PART I

Item 1. Business

We are a stock life insurance company located at 140 Garden Street, Hartford, Connecticut, 06154, and were chartered by a Special Act of the Connecticut General Assembly on April 25, 1980. Effective March 1, 1996, we became a wholly-owned stock life insurance subsidiary of Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company ("MassMutual ") when the operations of our former parent, Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company were merged with and into MassMutual.

We are principally engaged in the sale of life insurance and annuities, primarily flexible premium universal life insurance, variable life insurance, and variable annuity products. We distribute these products through career agents, registered financial planners, and brokers. We are licensed to sell life insurance and annuities in Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia and 49 states (excluding New York.)

Functionally, we are part of MassMutual's operations, and as a result, a discussion of MassMutual's operations is useful for an understanding of our business.

MassMutual is a mutual life insurance company organized as a Massachusetts corporation, which was originally chartered in 1851. As a mutual life insurance company, MassMutual has no shareholders. MassMutual's primary business is individual life insurance, annuity and disability income products distributed primarily through career agents. MassMutual also provides, directly or through its subsidiaries, a wide range of pension products and services, as well as investment services to individuals, corporations, and institutions in all 50 states of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia. MassMutual and its subsidiaries or affiliates are also licensed to transact business in six provinces of Canada, Chile, Argentina, Bermuda, and Luxembourg although its operations in such jurisdictions are not material.

MassMutual's principal lines of business are:

The MassMutual Investment Group, whose operations effective January 1, 2000, were merged into David L. Babson and Company, Inc., a MassMutual wholly-owned subsidiary, provides investment advisory services to us, our affiliates and various outside individual and institutional investors through MassMutual's investment management staff and its subsidiaries: Oppenheimer Acquisition Corporation, which owns OppenheimerFunds, Inc.; DLB Acquisition Corporation, which owns David L. Babson and Company, Inc.; Antares Capital Corporation; and Cornerstone Real Estate Advisors, Inc.

Together with our parent, Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company ("MassMutual") and its subsidiaries, we comprise a growth-oriented, diversified financial services company that seeks to provide superior value for policyholders and other customers by achieving exceptional results. We are in the business of helping our customers achieve financial success while protecting their families and businesses. We are committed to maintaining a position of preeminent financial strength by achieving consistent and long-term profitable growth. This will be done by:

Products

The principal products we offer include:

Set forth below is a description of our principal products:
Term Life. Term life insurance provides life insurance protection for a fixed period and has no cash value. We offer a variety of term insurance products designed to meet varying client needs. Almost all term insurance products allow conversion within a specified time period to one of our other insurance products.

Universal Life. Universal life insurance provides the policyholder with flexible premiums and death benefits as well as no lapse guarantees. We credit premiums in excess of specified sales charges to the account value of the policy, which are allocated to the fixed account backed by our general investment account. That account value includes a guaranteed principal with a minimum interest credit. The policy value is the net result of the premium payments plus interest credits minus expense and cost of insurance charges minus the amount of any partial surrenders.

Variable and Corporate Owned Life. Variable life insurance provides the policyholder, within guidelines established by the terms of the policy, the ability to select and change premium levels, amounts of death benefits and investment options. We credit premiums in excess of specified sales charges to the account value of the policy. We apply net premiums, as instructed by the policyholder, to a guaranteed principal account backed by our general investment account, or to one or more of our separate account investment options. The policyholder bears the investment risk for cash values invested in the separate accounts. We deduct the cost of insurance and administrative charges from the accumulating account value to which we credit the premiums. We also offer various corporate owned fixed or variable universal life products.

Fixed and Variable Annuities. Annuity products provide for the payment of periodic benefits at regular intervals beginning at a specified date and continuing for a specific period of time or for life. For our fixed annuity products, we credit premiums to the account value of the contract, which are allocated to a fixed account backed by our general investment account. Variable annuities are individual non-participating contracts which provide for either a single or periodic premium, which may be directed to a guaranteed principal account backed by general investment account, or to one of several separate account investment options for which the investment risk is borne by the contract holder.

Reinsurance

We cede a portion of our life insurance business to MassMutual and other insurers in the normal course of business. Our retention limit per individual insured is $15.0 million; the portion of the risk exceeding the retention limit is reinsured with other insurers including MassMutual. We are contingently liable with respect to ceded reinsurance in the event any reinsurer is unable to fulfill its contractual obligations.

We have a modified coinsurance quota-share reinsurance agreement with MassMutual whereby we cede 75% of the premiums on certain universal life policies. In return, MassMutual pays us a stipulated expense allowance, death and surrender benefits, and a modified coinsurance adjustment based upon experience. Assets and related reserves for payment of future benefits for the ceded policies are retained by us. Premium income of $29.8 million in 1999, $33.7 million in 1998 and $35.1 million in 1997 was ceded to MassMutual. Policyholder benefits of $38.7 million in 1999, $38.4 million in 1998 and $36.9 million in 1997 were ceded to MassMutual.

We also have a stop-loss agreement with MassMutual under which we cede claims, which, in aggregate, exceed .22% of the covered volume for any year, with maximum coverage of $25.0 million above the aggregate limit. The aggregate limit was $45.4 million in 1999, $36.9 million in 1998, and $35.6 million in 1997 and it was not exceeded in any of the years. Premium income of $1.3 million in 1999, and $1.0 million in 1998 and 1997 was ceded to MassMutual.

Competition

The life insurance industry is highly competitive. There are more than 1,500 life insurance companies in the United States, many of which offer insurance products similar to those we market. In addition to competition within the industry, insurers are increasingly facing competition from non-traditional sources in the financial services industry. Such businesses include mutual funds, banks, securities brokerage houses, and other financial service entities. Many of our competitors provide alternative investment and savings vehicles for consumers. Legislative initiatives at the federal level were enacted in November of 1999 that could reorder the financial services industry, thereby changing the environment in which we compete.

We believe our financial strength, agent skill, and product performance provide competitive advantages for the products we offer in these markets. Our, and MassMutual's, year-end 1999 ratings were again among the highest enjoyed by any company in any industry. Our, and MassMutual's, AAA financial strength rating from Standard & Poor's, A++ (Superior) financial strength rating from A.M. Best, and AAA claims-paying rating from Duff & Phelps were the highest possible. Our, and MassMutual's, Aa1 financial strength rating from Moody's Investors Service was the highest in its "Excellent" category.

Each rating agency independently assigns ratings based on its own separate review and takes into account a variety of factors, which are subject to change in making its decision. Accordingly, there can be no assurance of the ratings that will be afforded us in the future.

Transactions with MassMutual

We have an agreement with MassMutual whereby, for a fee, MassMutual furnishes us, as required, operating facilities, human resources, computer software development and managerial services. Also, MassMutual provides us with investment and administrative services pursuant to a management services agreement. Fees incurred under the terms of these agreements were $124.5 million in 1999, $74.1 million in 1998, and $39.7 million in 1997.

In addition, as discussed earlier, we have a modified coinsurance quota-share reinsurance agreement on certain universal life policies and a stop-loss agreement with MassMutual.

Regulation

We are organized as a Connecticut stock life insurance company, and are subject to Connecticut laws governing insurance companies. We are regulated and supervised by the State of Connecticut Insurance Commissioner. By March 1 of every year, we must prepare and file an annual statement, in a form prescribed by the State of Connecticut Insurance Department, as of December 31 of the preceding year. The Commissioner's agents have the right at all times to review or examine our books and assets. A full examination of our operations is conducted periodically according to the rules and practices of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners. We are also subject to the insurance laws of the states in which we are authorized to do business, to various federal and state securities laws and regulations, and to regulatory agencies that administer those laws and regulations.

We are licensed to transact our insurance business in, and are subject to regulation and supervision by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, and 49 states (excluding New York.) The extent of such regulation varies. However, most jurisdictions have laws and regulations requiring the licensing of insurers and their agents, and setting standards of solvency and business conduct to be maintained by licensed insurance companies, and may regulate withdrawal from certain markets. In addition, statutes and regulations in certain states usually require the approval of policy forms and, for certain lines of insurance, the approval of rates. Such statutes and regulations also prescribe the permitted types and concentration of investments. We are also subject to regulation of our accounting methodologies and are required to file detailed annual financial statements with supervisory agencies in each of the jurisdictions in which we do business. Each of our operations and accounts are also subject to examination by such agencies at regular intervals.

All 50 states of the United States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico have insurance guaranty fund laws requiring insurance companies doing business within those jurisdictions to participate in guaranty associations. Guaranty associations are organized to cover, subject to certain limits, contractual obligations under insurance policies and certificates issued under group insurance policies, issued by impaired or insolvent life insurance companies. These associations levy assessments, up to prescribed limits, on all member insurers in a particular state. Levies are calculated on the basis of the proportionate share of the premiums written by member insurers in the lines of business in which the impaired or insolvent insurer is engaged. Some states permit member insurers to recover assessments paid through full or partial premium tax offsets, usually over a period of years.

In addition to regulation of our insurance business, we are subject to various types of federal and state laws and regulations affecting the conduct, taxation, and other aspects of our businesses and products. Certain policies and contracts we offer are subject to the federal securities laws administered by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

We believe that we are in compliance, in all material respects, with all applicable regulations.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In March 1998, the NAIC adopted the Codification of Statutory Accounting Principles ("Codification"). Codification provides a comprehensive guide of statutory accounting principles for use by insurers in all states and is expected to become effective not later than January 1, 2001. We will report the effect of adopting Codification as an adjustment to shareholder's equity on the effective date. We are currently reviewing the impact of Codification, however, due to the nature of certain required accounting changes and their sensitivity to factors such as interest rates, we can not determine at this time the actual impact of adoption.

Item 2. Properties

Our principal office is located at 140 Garden Street, Hartford, Connecticut.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We are involved in litigation arising in and out of the normal course of business, including suits which seek both compensatory and punitive damages. While we are not aware of any actions or allegations which should reasonably give rise to any material adverse effect, the outcome of litigation cannot be foreseen with certainty. It is our opinion, after consultation with legal counsel, that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not materially affect our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders during 1999, other than routine corporate governance matters.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

We are a wholly owned subsidiary of Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company, and as such, there is no market for our common stock.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

We have prepared the accompanying statutory financial information, in conformity with the practices of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners ("NAIC") and the accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the State of Connecticut Insurance Department ("statutory accounting practices").

The following statutory information as of and for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998, 1997, 1996 and 1995 has been derived from our audited statutory financial statements. The 1999 statutory financial statements have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent auditors'. The statutory financial statements for the years 1995 through 1998 were audited by auditors other than Deloitte & Touche LLP.

The accompanying statutory financial statements are different in some respects from financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP "). The more significant differences are as follows:

(a) acquisition costs, such as commissions and other costs directly related to acquiring new business, are charged to current operations as incurred, whereas GAAP would require these expenses to be capitalized and recognized over the life of the policies;
(b) statutory policy reserves are based upon the commissioners' reserve valuation methods and statutory mortality, morbidity, and interest assumptions, whereas GAAP reserves would generally be based upon net level premium and estimated gross margin methods and appropriately conservative estimates of future mortality, morbidity, and interest assumptions;
(c) bonds are generally carried at amortized cost whereas GAAP generally requires they be reported at fair value;
(d) deferred income taxes are not provided for book-tax timing differences as would be required by GAAP; and
(e) payments received for universal and variable life products and variable annuities are reported as premium income and changes in reserves, whereas under GAAP, these payments would be recorded as deposits to policyholders' account balances.

We record our investments in accordance with rules established by the NAIC. Generally, we value:

We develop reserves for life insurance contracts using accepted actuarial methods computed principally on the net level premium, the Commissioners' Reserve Valuation Method and the California Method bases using the 1980 Commissioners' Standard Ordinary mortality tables with assumed interest rates ranging from 2.50 to 4.50 percent.

We develop reserves for individual annuities based on accepted actuarial methods at interest rates ranging from 6.25 to 9.00 percent.

Provision for federal income taxes is based upon our estimate of our tax liability. No deferred tax effect is recognized for temporary differences that may exist between financial reporting and taxable income. Accordingly, the reporting of miscellaneous temporary differences, such as reserves and policy acquisition costs, resulted in effective tax rates which differ from the statutory tax rate.

We maintain an Asset Valuation Reserve ("AVR") and an Interest Maintenance Reserve ("IMR"), in compliance with regulatory requirements. The AVR and other investment reserves stabilize surplus against fluctuations in the value of stocks and bonds. The IMR defers after-tax realized capital gains and losses that result from changes in the overall level of interest rates, for all types of fixed income investments and interest related hedging activities. These interest related capital gains and losses are amortized into net investment income using the grouped method over the remaining life of the investment sold or over the remaining life of the underlying asset.

The preparation of financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, as well as disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities, at the date of the financial statements. We must also make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Future events, including changes in the levels of mortality, morbidity, interest rates, persistency, and asset valuations, could cause our actual results to differ from the estimates we used in the financial statements.

This information should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the financial statements and other information included elsewhere in this filing. The results for past accounting periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any future accounting period.

C.M. Life Insurance Company
Selected Historical Financial Data
For the Years Ended December 31,

(In Millions)

Revenue:
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
          Premium income $      939 $    406 $   331 $   314 $    261
         Net investment income 85 82 75 75 69
         Fees and other income 8 6 8 9 20





1,032 494 414 398 350





Benefits and expenses:
          Policyholders’ benefits and payments 332 185 100 99 59
          Addition to policyholders’ reserves and 519 168 200 218 216
             funds
          Commissions 82 50 34 25 14
          Operating expenses, state taxes,
               licenses and fees 132 80 53 48 37





1,065 483 387 390 326





Net gain (loss) from operations before
     federal income taxes (33 ) 11 27 8 24
     Federal income taxes 2 7 19 6 9





     Net gain (loss) from operations (35 ) 4 8 2 15
     Net realized capital loss (9 ) (1 ) -- -- (1 )





     Net income (loss) $     (44 ) $        3 $       8 $       2 $      14





Assets:
          General account assets $  1,389 $ 1,212 $1,123 $1,087 $ 1,029
          Separate account assets 1,764 1,319 1,096 780 531





         Total assets $  3,153 $ 2,531 $2,219 $1,867 $ 1,560





Liabilities:
          Policyholders’ reserves and funds $   1,176 $    996 $   951 $   907 $    868
         Asset valuation and investment reserves 23 24 27 22 20
         Other liabilities 95 51 32 48 28
          Separate account liabilities 1,764 1,319 1,096 780 531





         Total liabilities 3,058 2,390 2,106 1,757 1,447





Shareholder’s Equity:
          Common stock 2 2 2 2 2
          Paid-in capital and contributed surplus(1) 69 69 44 44 44
          Unassigned surplus 24 70 67 64 67





         Total shareholder’s equity 95 141 113 110 113





Total liabilities and shareholder’s equity $   3,153 $ 2,531 $2,219 $1,867 $ 1,560





Total adjusted capital data(2)
         Total shareholder’s equity $        95 $    141 $   113 $   110 $    113
         Asset valuation reserve 21 22 23 18 16





         Total adjusted capital $      116 $    163 $   136 $   128 $    129





(1) In 1998, we received a surplus contribution of $25 million from MassMutual.
(2) Defined by the NAIC as surplus plus AVR.

We reclassified prior year amounts to conform with the current year presentation.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
            and Results of Operation

General

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the audited Statutory Financial Statements, Notes to Statutory Financial Statements, and Selected Historical Financial Data. This Management’s Discussion and Analysis reviews our financial condition at December 31, 1999 and 1998, our results of operations for the past three years and, where appropriate, factors that may affect our future financial performance.

Together with our parent, MassMutual and its subsidiaries, we comprise a growth-oriented, diversified financial services company that seeks to provide superior value for policyholders and other customers by achieving exceptional results. We are in the business of helping our customers achieve financial success while protecting their families and businesses. We are committed to maintaining a position of preeminent financial strength by achieving consistent and long-term profitable growth. This will be done by:

At December 31, 1999, we had $3.2 billion in total statutory assets, over 200,000 individual policyholders and $56.7 billion of direct individual life insurance in force. Our total adjusted capital, as defined by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”), was $116 million at December 31, 1999.

The following table sets forth the calculation of total adjusted capital:

December 31,
1999
1998
1997
(In Millions)
Shareholder’s equity
$ 95
 
$ 141
 
$ 113
Asset valuation reserve
21
 
22
 
23



Total adjusted capital (1)
$ 116
 
$ 163
 
$ 136



(1) Defined by the NAIC as surplus plus AVR.

Objective testimony to our strong performance and market position is reflected in our ratings, which at year-end 1999 were again among the highest enjoyed by any company in any industry. Our, and MassMutual's, year-end 1999 ratings were again among the highest enjoyed by any company in any industry. Our, and MassMutual's, AAA financial strength rating from Standard & Poor's, A++ (Superior) financial strength rating from A.M. Best, and AAA claims-paying rating from Duff & Phelps were the highest possible. Our, and MassMutual's, Aa1 financial strength rating from Moody's Investors Service was the highest in its "Excellent" category. Each rating agency independently assigns ratings based on its own separate review and takes into account a variety of factors, which are subject to change in making its decision. Accordingly, there can be no assurance of the ratings that will be afforded us in the future.

Forward-Looking Information

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a "Safe harbor" for forward-looking statements which are identified as such and are accompanied by the identification of important factors which could cause a material difference from the forward-looking statements.

Certain information contained in this discussion is or may be considered forward-looking. Forward-looking statements are those not based on historical information, but rather, related to future operations, strategies, financial results, or other developments, and contain terms such as "may," "expects," "should," "believes, " "anticipates," "intends," "estimates," "projects," "goals," "objectives," or similar expressions.

Forward-looking statements are based upon estimates and assumptions. These statements may change due to the business uncertainties, economic uncertainties, competitive uncertainties, and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. Additionally, our business decisions are also subject to change. We do not publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, as a result of new information, future developments, or otherwise.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth the components of our net income (loss):

Years Ended December 31,
1999
1998
1997
% Change
99 vs 98
% Change
98 vs 97
($ In Millions)

Revenue:

Premium income
$ 939
 
$ 406
 
$ 331
 
131
%
23
%
Net investment income
85
 
82
 
75
 
4
 
9
Fees and other income
8
 
6
 
8
 
33
 
(25
)





Total revenue
1,032
 
494
 
414
 
109
 
19





Benefits and Expenses:                  
Policyholders’ benefits and payments
332
 
185
 
100
 
79
 
85
Addition to policyholders’ reserves and funds
519
 
168
 
200
 
NM
 
(16
)
Commissions
82
 
50
 
34
 
64
 
47
Operating expenses, state taxes, licenses and fees
132
 
80
 
53
 
65
 
51





Total benefits and expenses
1,065
 
483
 
387
 
120
 
25





Net gain (loss) from operations                  
before federal income taxes
(33
)
11
 
27
 
NM
 
(59
)
Federal income taxes
2
 
7
 
19
 
(71
)
(63
)





Net gain (loss) from operations
(35
)
4
 
8
 
NM
 
(50
)
Net realized capital loss

(9

)
(1
)
 
NM
 





Net income (loss)
$ (44
)
$ 3
 
$ 8
 
NM
%
(63
)%





NM = not meaningful or in excess of 200%.

Net income decreased in 1999 and 1998 primarily due to the continued growth in our annuity business, as well as increases in the amount of life insurance in force. This growth has caused a significant increase in acquisition and related costs, which exceed first year premiums on new business. Generally, the result of this growth is increased policyholders ’ benefits and payments, addition to policyholders’ reserves and funds, commissions and expenses, partially offset by increased premium income.

Selected premium and life insurance information is presented below:

Years Ended December 31,

1999

1998
1997
% Change
99 vs 98
% Change
98 vs 97
($ In Millions)
Premium Income:
Term life
$ 26
 
$ 27
 
$ 21
 
(4
)%
29
%
Universal, variable & corporate owned life
283
 
171
 
138
 
65
 
24
Annuities and supplementary contracts
694
 
261
 
214
 
166
 
22
Other
 
6
 
5
 
(100
)
20





     Total direct premiums
1,003
 
465
 
378
 
116
 
23
Reinsurance ceded
64
 
59
 
47
 
8
 
26





     Total
$ 939
 
$ 406
 
$ 331
 
131
%
23
%





Life Insurance Sales Face Amount:

                 
Term life
$ 1,611
 
$ 3,165
 
$ 1,886
 
(49
)%
68
%
Universal, variable & corporate owned life
11,720
 
11,698
 
11,335
 
 
3





     Total direct sales
13,331
 
14,863
 
13,221
 
(10
)
12
Reinsurance ceded
10,886
 
10,638
 
11,660
 
2
 
(9
)





     Total
$ 2,445
 
$ 4,225
 
$ 1,561
 
(42
)%
171
%





Life Insurance In Force Face Amount:                  
Term life
$10,216
 
$10,040
 
$ 8,117
 
2
%
24
%
Universal, variable & corporate owned life
46,492
 
37,049
 
28,031
 
25
 
32





     Total direct in-force
56,708
 
47,089
 
36,148
 
20
 
30
Reinsurance ceded
35,004
 
27,665
 
18,127
 
27
 
53





     Total
$21,704
 
$19,424
 
$18,021
 
12
%
8
%





 
(In Whole Units)
Number of Policies In Force:
Term life
25,252
 
25,262
 
21,815
 
 
16
%
Universal, variable & corporate owned life
155,237
 
134,422
 
114,979
 
15
%
17
Annuities
37,279
 
30,745
 
28,143
 
21
 
9





     Total
217,768
 
190,429
 
164,937
 
14
%
15
%





Premium income increased in 1999 and 1998 primarily due to increases in premiums of universal life, variable life and variable annuity products. The increase in premiums for life insurance products is largely attributable to continued growth in the in force of universal life products; the redesign of an existing variable universal life product and the issuance of a new variable universal life product in 1999; and the introduction of two new life products in 1998. Variable annuity premiums have increased primarily due to adding new fund options on existing products and the introduction of two new annuity products.

Our business mix has shifted as a result of increasing sales of annuity products. Universal and other life products comprised 26% of total premium income during 1999, compared to 36% in 1998. Annuity products were 74% of total premium income in 1999, compared to 64% in 1998.

The components of net investment income are set forth in the table below:

Years Ended December 31,

1999
 
1998
 
1997
 
% Change
99 vs 98
 
% Change
98vs 97
 
($ In Millions)
Gross Investment Income:
     Bonds
$51
 
$48
 
$53
 
6
%
(9
)%
     Mortgage loans
13
 
8
 
5
 
63
 
60
     Other investments
7
 
10
 
4
 
(30
)
150
     Policy loans
10
 
12
 
11
 
(17
)
9
     Cash and short-term investments
6
 
6
 
4
 
 
50





     Total gross investment income
87
 
84
 
77
 
4
 
9
     Less: Investment expenses
(2
)
(2
)
(2
)
 





Net Investment Income
$85
 
$82
 
$75
 
4
%
9
%





Net investment income increased in 1999 due to a 10% increase in average invested assets partially offset by a decrease in the gross yield for the investment portfolio to 7.4% in 1999 from 7.9% in 1998. Net investment income increased in 1998 due to an 8% increase in average invested assets and an increase in the gross yield for the investment portfolio to 7.9% in 1998 from 7.6% in 1997.

The increase in 1999 in gross investment income from bonds is due to increased investment levels, while yields stayed steady. The decrease in 1998 gross investment income from bonds is due to declines in portfolio yields partially offset by increased assets invested. Bond yields declined in 1998 as older, higher yielding bonds matured and were replaced with bonds that had lower yields. The increase in income from mortgage loans in 1999 and 1998 is due to an increase in the size of the mortgage portfolio caused by our strategy to increase mortgage acquisition activity.

The decrease in gross investment income on other investments in 1999 resulted primarily from decreased investments in affiliated mutual fund common stock and the receipt of an extraordinary dividend from an affiliated mutual fund in 1998.

The increase in other investments gross investment income in 1998 is primarily due to increased investment in financial options as a result of favorable market conditions and the 1998 extraordinary dividend received from an affiliated mutual fund. Fluctuations in market conditions will impact future investment results.

The components of fees and other income are set forth in the table below:

Years Ended December 31,

1999
 
1998
 
1997
 
% Change
99 vs 98
 
% Change
98 vs 97
 
 
   
($ In Millions)
       
Fees
$23
 
$14
 
$11
 
64
%
27
%
Commission and expense allowance on
               
  reinsurance ceded
10
 
13
 
14
 
(23
)
(7
)
Reserve adjustment on reinsurance ceded
(25
)
(21
)
(17
)
(19
)
(24
)





     Total fees and other income
$ 8
 
$ 6
 
$ 8
 
33
%
(25
)%





Fees increased in 1999 and 1998 due to increases in fees collected from separate accounts as a result of increased variable life and variable annuity sales. In 1999 and 1998 we experienced decreases in commissions and expense allowances on reinsurance ceded and increases in the reserve adjustment on reinsurance ceded as a result of credits we received on our modified coinsurance agreement with MassMutual.

The primary driver of the $147 million increase in policyholders’ benefits and payments in 1999 from 1998 and $85 million increase in 1998 from 1997 was surrender benefits on individual annuity products and a $33 million 1999 surrender of one large corporate owned life insurance contract holder. Individual annuity surrenders increased $99 million, or 44%, during 1999 and $84 million, or 66%, during 1998 with the majority of the withdrawals coming from separate accounts. We believe this increased rate of individual annuity surrenders is primarily due to two factors: 1) the investment fund options currently offered with our annuity products use a “value” based investment philosophy that has temporarily fallen out of favor when compared to other investment options, such as “growth” funds, due to recent market conditions and, 2) a natural increase in the dollar amount of surrenders as business growth causes a higher level of annuity customer account values. Though it is not known if an increased level of surrenders will continue, we have and are taking steps that we believe will reduce surrender activity by enhancing product offerings through the addition of new fund options and other product features. Life insurance surrenders increased $3 million during both 1999 and 1998. The life insurance lapse rate, which is based upon the amount of insurance in force, increased to 7.9% for 1999 from 6.7% in 1998 and 6.5% in 1997. Death claims, net of reinsurance, increased $11 million, or 47%, to $35 million in 1999 compared to a decrease of $2 million, or 11%, in 1998. This increase was primarily due to unfavorable direct mortality experience in 1999 compared to 1998, partially offset by favorable reinsurance recoveries.

Addition to policyholders’ reserves and funds includes transfers to and from the separate accounts, based upon policyholder elections, and the change in general account reserves. The increase during 1999 is primarily attributable to a $330 million increase in separate account deposits, partially offset by a $109 million increase in separate account withdrawals and other transfers. The decrease during 1998 was primarily due to a $70 million increase in separate account withdrawals, partially offset by a $44 million increase in separate account deposits. General account reserves also increased by $118 million in 1999 and $20 million in 1998, primarily due to an increase in annuity deposits into the general account.

Commissions increased in 1999 and 1998 primarily due to increases in sales of annuities and life insurance. Life insurance commissions increased $21 million in 1999 and $11 million in 1998, while annuity products contributed increases of $11 million in 1999 and $6 million in 1998. The overall decrease in commissions as a percentage of sales is due to the shift in sales mix to annuity products, which have lower commission rates than life products.

The increase in operating expenses, state taxes, licenses, and fees during 1999 and 1998 is primarily attributable to the increased production of new business that resulted in increased management fees. Management fees charged by MassMutual include increases in agency allowances associated with business growth. The growth in these expenses is consistent with our premium growth.

The decrease in federal income taxes during 1999 and 1998 is primarily attributable to the declining net gain (loss) from operations before federal income taxes, partially offset by the difference between statutory insurance reserves and tax reserves and the timing of the tax deductibility of acquisition costs and other items.

Net realized capital gains (losses) were comprised of the following:

Years Ended December 31,


 
1999
1998
1997
% Change
99 vs 98
% Change
98 vs 97
 
($ In Millions)
   
Realized Capital Gains (Losses):
Bonds
$(3
)
$4
 
$3
 
(175
)%
33
%
Mortgage loans
-
 
(1
)
 
100
 
NM
Other investments
(7
)
1
 
 
NM
 
NM
Federal and state taxes
-
 
(2
)
(1
)
100
 
(100
)




 
Net realized capital gains (losses) before deferral into IMR
(10
)
2
 
2
 
NM
 
Gains (losses) deferred into IMR
1
 
(3
)
(2
)
133
 
(50
)




 
Net realized capital gains (losses)
$(9
)
$(1
)
$ -
 
NM
 %
NM
%
 
 
 
 
 
 

NM = Not meaningful or in excess of 200%.

We attribute the increase in 1999 realized capital losses after transfers to the IMR, primarily to losses from investments in affiliated mutual funds, and credit-related losses from the sale of bonds.

We attribute the increase in 1998 net realized capital losses after transfers to the IMR, primarily to credit related mortgage loan losses, which are not transferred to the IMR.

Statement of Financial Position

The following table sets forth our more significant assets, liabilities and shareholder’s equity:

Years Ended December 31,

1999
1998
% Change
($ In Millions)
Assets:
       
     Bonds
$ 735
 
$ 683
 
8
%
     Mortgage loans
225
 
126
 
79
     Other investments
26
 
76
 
(66)
     Policy loans
121
 
150
 
(19)
     Cash and short-term investments
182
 
106
 
72



          Total investments
1,289
 
1,141
 
13
     Other assets
100
 
71
 
41



1,389
 
1,212
 
15
     Separate account assets
1,764
 
1,319
 
34



          Total assets
$3,153
 
$2,531
 
25
%



Liabilities and shareholder’s equity:          
         
     Policyholders’ reserves and funds
$1,176
 
$ 996
 
18
%
     Asset valuation and other investment reserves
23
 
24
 
(4)
     Other liabilities
95
 
51
 
86



1,294
 
1,071
 
21
     Separate account liabilities
1,764
 
1,319
 
34



          Total liabilities
3,058
 
2,390
 
28
         
Shareholder’s equity
95
 
141
 
(33
)
 
 
 
 
          Total liabilities and shareholder’s equity
$3,153
 
$2,531
 
25
%



Assets

Total assets at December 31, 1999, increased by $622 million, from December 31, 1998. We attribute this increase primarily to continued growth in our separate accounts, as the result of continued growth in deposits of variable products, partially offset by withdrawals.

General account assets increased $177 million, or 15%, to $1,389 million as of December 31, 1999, from $1,212 million as of December 31, 1998. We attribute this increase primarily to increases in mortgage loans, bonds and cash and short-term investments, partially offset by a reduction in other investments. These increases in investments were primarily the result of our continued growth and the investment of cash flow generated by our operations.

The increase in bonds during 1999 includes $475 million in purchases and $423 million of maturities and sales proceeds. There was a slight change in the mix of bonds at December 31, 1999, compared with December 31, 1998. Bond investments in U. S. Treasury and other government holdings increased to 12% of the total portfolio as of December 31, 1999, from 10% as of December 31, 1998. Mortgage-backed securities dropped from 8% to 7% and corporate debt securities dropped from 77% to

76% of the portfolio in 1999 and 1998, respectively. Bonds and short-term securities in NAIC classes 1 and 2 were 64% of general account invested assets at December 31, 1999, as compared to 61% at December 31, 1998. The percentage of our general account invested assets representing bonds and short-term investments in NAIC classes 3 through 6 was 6% at December 31, 1999, and 8% at December 31, 1998. See "Investments" section for more discussion of NAIC Investment classes.

The increase in mortgage loans is primarily attributed to a continuation of our strategy of increasing our investments in mortgage loans due to favorable market conditions. For the year ended December 31, 1999, $130 million of new loans were issued and $31 million was received on outstanding accounts.

Other investments consisting of financial options, interest rate caps and floors, preferred stocks, and affiliated common stocks decreased during 1999 primarily due to the reduction of affiliated common stock. This decrease in affiliated common stock was driven by a $51 million withdrawal of seed money from affiliated mutual funds. The seed money was an investment used to fund the creation of new mutual funds.

Policy loans decreased during 1999 primarily due to a large surrender in late 1999 of a corporate owned life policy with an outstanding policy loan of $33 million.

The increase in other assets is due primarily to a $25 million increase in transfers due from the separate accounts. Transfers due from separate accounts represents policyholders' account values in excess of statutory benefit reserves. This growth is consistent with the overall increase in separate account business in force.

Liabilities

As with assets, most of the 1999 growth occurred in the separate accounts as discussed earlier.

The increase in policyholders' reserves and funds, primarily attributable to growth from new sales in annuity products and interest credited, was partially offset by transfers to separate accounts and withdrawals.

The increase in other liabilities is primarily due to our continued growth. This resulted in a $21 million increase in payable to parent and a $30 million increase in suspense accounts, partially offset by a net decrease in other liabilities.

Shareholder's Equity

The decrease in shareholder's equity was due to:

partially offset by:

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity

Cash and short-term investments increased $76 million, or 72%, during 1999 as a result of increased funds available for investment provided by operating activities.

Net cash provided by operating activities increased $103 million, or 184%, in 1999. We attribute the increase primarily to increased sales, investment income, and fees from separate accounts. This increase was partially offset by increased surrender benefits, withdrawals, death benefits, general expenses, and commissions.

Loans and purchases of investments decreased $83 million, or 15%, and sales and maturities of investments and receipts from repayments of loans decreased $102 million, or 20%, in 1999. We attribute these decreases primarily to a lower volume of purchases and sales of bonds due to changes in market conditions.

In the second quarter of 1998, MassMutual made a $25 million surplus contribution to supply us with cash flow and the capital needed to support our continued business growth. The Board of Directors of MassMutual has authorized the contribution of funds to us sufficient to meet the capital requirements of all states in which we are licensed to do business.

We utilize sophisticated asset/liability analysis techniques in order to set the investment policy for each liability class. Additionally, we test the adequacy of the projected cash flow provided by assets to meet all of our future policyholder and other obligations. We perform these studies using stress tests regarding future credit and other asset losses, market interest rate fluctuations, claim losses and other considerations. The result is a complete picture of the adequacy of our underlying assets, reserves, and capital.

We have structured our investment portfolio to ensure a strong liquidity position in order to permit timely payment of policy and contract benefits without requiring an untimely sale of assets. We manage our liquidity position by matching our exposure to cash demands with adequate sources of cash and other liquid assets.

Our principal sources of liquidity are operating cash flow and holdings of cash, cash equivalents, and other readily marketable assets. Our primary cash flow sources are investment income, principal repayments on invested assets, and life insurance premiums.

Our liquid assets include Treasury bond holdings, short-term money market investments, stocks, and marketable long-term fixed income securities. The carrying value of highly liquid securities, comprised of NAIC Class 1 and 2 publicly traded bonds, was approximately $548 million at December 31, 1999.

We proactively manage our liquidity position on an ongoing basis to meet cash needs while minimizing adverse impacts on investment returns. We analyze a variety of scenarios modeling potential demands on liquidity, taking into account the provisions of our policies and contracts in force, our cash flow position, and the volume of cash and readily marketable securities in our portfolio.

One of our primary liquidity concerns is the risk of early contract holder and policyholder withdrawal. The two most affected products are individual life insurance and individual deferred annuities. Life insurance policies are less susceptible to withdrawal than annuity contracts because annuities are primarily used as investment vehicles, while life policies are used to fulfill longer-term financial planning needs. We closely evaluate and manage our liquidity risk by, for example, seeking to include provisions such as contingent deferred sales charges limiting withdrawal rights to discourage surrenders.

Based on our ongoing monitoring and analysis of our liquidity sources and demands, we believe that we are in a strong liquidity position.

Capital Resources

As of December 31, 1999, our total adjusted capital as defined by the NAIC was $116 million. The NAIC developed the Risk Based Capital ( "RBC") model to compare the total adjusted capital with a standard design in order to reflect an insurance company's risk profile. Although we believe that there is no single appropriate means of measuring RBC needs, we feel that the NAIC approach to RBC measurement is reasonable, and we manage our capital position with significant attention to maintaining adequate total adjusted capital relative to RBC. Our total adjusted capital was well in excess of all RBC standards at December 31, 1999 and 1998. We believe we enjoy a strong capital position in light of our risks and that we are well positioned to meet policyholder and other obligations.

Inflation

A large portion of our operating expenses consist of administrative fees charged by MassMutual. The largest component of these fees is salaries, which are subject to wage increases that are at least partially affected by the rate of inflation. Our continuing efforts to control expenses may reduce the impact of inflation on operating expenses.

Inflation also indirectly affects us. New sales and surrenders of our insurance products, as well as investment income are influenced by inflation to the extent that the government's economic policy to control the level of inflation results in changes in interest rates.

Investments

General

As directed by our policyholders, the majority of our assets are policyholders’ investments in our separate accounts. We record the assets in our separate accounts at market value, and we pass all investment risks on to the policyholders. The following discussion focuses on the general investment account portfolio, which does not include our separate account assets.

At December 31, 1999, we had $1,289 million of invested assets in our general investment account. We manage the portfolio of invested assets to support the general account liabilities of the business in light of yield, liquidity, and diversification considerations.

The following table sets forth our invested assets in the general investment account and related gross investment yield:

    December 31,
    1999
1998
1997
    Carrying
Value
% of
Total
Yield Carrying
Value
% of
Total
Yield Carrying
Value
% of
Total
Yield
    ($ In Millions)
   
Bonds   $   735
57%
7.5%
$   683
60%
7.5%
$ 665
63% 7.9%
Mortgage loans   225
18
7.7
126
11
7.3
102
10
7.6
Other investments   26
2
14.7
76
7
14.8
64
6
7.7
Policy loans   121
9
7.6
150
13
8.8
142
13
8.0
Cash and short-term investments   182
14
4.3
106
9
5.9
88
8
5.3
Total investments   $1,289
100%
7.4%
$1,141
100%
7.9%
$1,061
100%
7.6%
   

We calculate the yield on each investment category, before federal income taxes as: (a) two times gross investment income divided by (b) the sum of assets at the beginning of the year and assets at the end of the year, less gross investment income. If investment expenses were deducted, our net yields would be 7.2%, 7.7%, and 7.5% for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively.

Bonds

The following table provides certain information regarding the maturity distribution of bonds, excluding short-term securities:

  December 31,
1999
 
Carrying
Value
% of
Total
  ($ In Millions)
Due in one year or less
$  55
8 %
Due after one year through five years
194
26
Due after five years through ten years
311
42
Due after ten years
79
11
   
 
 
 
639
87
Mortgage-backed securities (1)
96
13
   
 
 
Total
$735
100
%
 

(1) Average life is 6.5 years, including securities guaranteed by the U.S. Government.

We carefully monitor and manage our bond portfolio to ensure that bond maturities are sufficiently diversified in light of our liquidity needs.

Bonds consist primarily of government securities and high-quality marketable corporate securities. We invest a significant portion of our investment funds in high quality publicly traded bonds in order to maintain and manage liquidity and reduce the risk of default in the portfolio.

As of December 31, 1999, mortgage-backed securities in the bond portfolio consisted of $52 million of Government National Mortgage Association ( “GNMA”), and Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA ”) commitments, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC ”) and Federal Housing Authority (“FHA”) mortgage-backed pass-through securities, and $44 million of government agency-backed collateralized mortgage obligations.

The tables below set forth the carrying value, gross unrealized gains and losses, net unrealized gains and losses and estimated fair value of our bond portfolio (excluding short-term securities) at December 31, 1999 and 1998.

  December 31, 1999
                       
    Carrying
Value
 

Gross
Unrealized
Gains

  Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  Net
Unrealized
Losses
  Estimated
Fair
Value
 
   
(In Millions)
 
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies   $  85   $1   $  2   $(1 ) $  84  
Debt securities issued by foreign governments   3   --   --   --   3  
Mortgage-backed securities   52   1   2   (1 ) 51  
State and local governments   10   --   --   --   10  
Corporate debt securities   562   3   18   (15 ) 547  
Utilities   17   --   1   (1 ) 16  
Affiliates     6     --     --     --       6  
     Total   $735
  $  5
  $ 23
  $ (18
) $717
 

 

    December 31, 1998
 
                       
    Carrying
Value
  Gross
Unrealized
Gains
  Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  Net
Unrealized
Losses
  Estimated
Fair
Value
 
  (In Millions)

U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies

  $  69   $  2   $--   $  2   $   71  
Debt securities issued by foreign governments   3   --   --   --   3  
Mortgage-backed securities   58   2   1   1   59  
State and local governments   12   --   --   --   12  
Corporate debt securities   523   17   3   14   537  
Utilities       18       1     --       1       19  
     Total   $ 683
  $ 22
  $ 4
  $18
  $701
 

The estimated fair value of bonds is based upon quoted market prices for actively traded securities. We subscribe to commercial pricing services providing estimated fair values of fixed income securities that are not actively traded. We generally determine estimated fair values for privately placed bonds by applying interest rate spreads based on quality and asset type to the appropriate duration on the Treasury yield curve.

Substantially all of our publicly traded and privately placed bonds are evaluated by the NAIC’s Securities Valuation Office (“SVO”), which assigns securities to one of six NAIC investment classes with Class 1 securities being the highest quality and Class 6 securities being the lowest quality. Classes 1 and 2 are investment grade, Class 3 is medium quality and Classes 4, 5 and 6 are non-investment grade. For securities which have not yet been rated by the NAIC, we use an internal rating system. We believe that our internal rating system is similar to that used by the SVO.

The table below sets forth the NAIC SVO ratings for our bond portfolio (including short-term securities) and, what we believe are the equivalent public rating agency designations. At December 31, 1999 and 1998, 91% and 88%, respectively, of the portfolio was invested in NAIC Classes 1 and 2 securities.

Bond Credit Quality
(includes short-term securities)

      December 31,
    1999
  1998

NAIC
Bond
Classes

  Rating Agency
Equivalent Designation
  Carrying
Value
% of
Total
Carrying
Value
% of
Total

  ($ In Millions)
1   Aaa/Aa/A   $403   45 % $399   50 %
2   Baa   417   46   298   38  
3   Ba   53   6   69   9  
4   B   27   3   22   3  
5   Caa and lower   1   --   --   --  
6   In or near default           1          --          --          --  
Total     $902
  100
% $788
  100
%
The tables below set forth the NAIC SVO ratings for our publicly traded and privately placed bond portfolios, including short-term securities, along with what we believe are the equivalent public rating agency designations:

Publicly Traded Bond Credit Quality
(includes short-term securities)

      December 31,
    1999
1998
NAIC
Bond
Classes
  Rating Agency
Equivalent Designation
  Carrying
Value
% of
Total
Carrying
Value
% of
Total

  ($ In Millions)
1   Aaa/Aa/A   $307   55 % $309   62 %
2   Baa   240   43   173   35  
3   Ba   7   1   14   3  
4   B   2   1   2   --  
5   Caa and lower   --   --   --   --  
6   In or near default          1         --         --         --  
Total     $557
  100
% $498
  100
%

Privately Placed Bond Credit Quality
(includes short-term securities)

     

December 31,

     
     
1999
1998


NAIC
Bond
Classes

 
Rating Agency
Equivalent Designation
 
Carrying
Value
% of
Total
Carrying
Value
% of
Total

 
($ In Millions)
1
  Aaa/Aa/A   $96   28 %   $90   31 %
2
  Baa   177   52     125   43  
3
  Ba   46   13     55   19  
4
  B   25   7     20   7  
5
  Caa and lower   1          
6
  In or near default            




    Total   $345   100 %   $290   100 %




We utilize our investments in the privately placed bond portfolio to enhance the value of our overall portfolio, increase diversification, and obtain higher yields than are possible with comparable quality public market securities. To control risk when utilizing privately placed securities, we rely upon:

The strength of our privately placed bond portfolio is demonstrated by the predominance of NAIC Classes 1 and 2 securities.

The following table sets forth by industry category the total bond portfolio, including short-term securities, as of December 31, 1999:

 

   
Bond Portfolio by Industry
(includes short-term securities)
   
  December 31, 1999
  Private
Public
Total
  Industry Category   Carrying
Value
% of
Total

Carrying
Value

% of
Total
Carrying
Value
% of
Total
    ($ In Millions)
                           
  Collateralized (1)   $  53   15 % $158   28 % $211   23 %
  Natural Resources   53   15   77   14   130   14  
  Consumer Services   75   22   22   4   97   11  
  Finance & Leasing Co.   29   8   63   11   92   10  
  Utilities   9   3   81   14   90   10  
  Construction   48   14   15   3   63   7  
  Governments   1   0   51   9   52   6  
  Consumer Goods   19   6   26   5   45   5  
  Media   17   5   17   3   34   4  
  Technology   16   5   17   3   33   4  
  Transportation   10   3   16   3   26   3  
  Health Care   3   1   9   2   12   1  
  Others   12
  3
  5
  1
  17
  2
 
  Total   $345
  100
% $557
  100
% $902
  100
%

(1) These bonds are collateralized by mortgages backed by FNMA, GNMA or FHLMC and include collateralized mortgage obligations and pass-through securities. These amounts also include asset backed securities such as credit card, automobile, and residential mortgage securities.

Bond Portfolio Surveillance and Under-Performing Investments

To identify under-performing investments, we review all bonds on a regular basis utilizing the following criteria:

We actively review the bond portfolio to estimate the likelihood and amount of financial defaults or write-downs in the portfolio and to make timely decisions as to the potential sale or renegotiation of terms of specific investments.

The NAIC defines under-performing bonds as those whose deferral of interest and/or principal payments are deemed to be caused by the inability of the obligor to make such payments as called for in the bond contract. At December 31, 1999, we had $2 million in under-performing bonds. At December 31, 1998, we had no under-performing bonds.

As a result of our conservative monitoring process, we generate an internal watch list, which includes certain securities that would not be classified as under-performing under the SVO credit rating system. At December 31, 1999, bonds having a carrying value of $23 million, or 3% of the total bond portfolio including short-term securities, had been placed on our internal watch list. The internal watch list is comprised of bonds that have the following NAIC ratings:

Mortgage Loans

Mortgage loans represented 17% and 11% of the total investments in the general account at December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively. Mortgage loans consist of commercial mortgage loans and residential mortgage loan pools. At December 31, 1999 and 1998, commercial mortgage loans comprised 72% and 64%, respectively, of the mortgage loan portfolio.

The following table provides certain information regarding the contractual maturity distribution of mortgage loans:

   
December 31, 1999
   
   
Carrying
Value
% of
Total
   
($ In Millions)
           
Commercial:          
Due in one year or less  
$ 3
2%
 
Due after one year through five years  
85
38
 
Due after five years through ten years  
64
28
 
Due after ten years  
10
4
 


     Total commercial  
162
72
 
Residential  
63
28
 


     Total  
$225
100%
 


Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without prepayment penalties.

Commercial

Our commercial mortgage loan portfolio consists of fixed and floating rate loans on completed, income producing properties. The majority of the portfolio is fixed rate mortgages.

At December 31, 1999, 97% of our commercial mortgage loan portfolio consisted of bullet loans compared to 98% at December 31, 1998. Bullet loans are loans that do not fully amortize over their term.

 

During 1999 and 1998, all renewed bullet loans were performing assets prior to renewal and all loan renewals reflected market conditions. Past experience with regard to bullet maturities, however, is not necessarily indicative of future results.

We consider the maturities of commercial mortgage loans to be sufficiently diversified, and carefully monitor and manage maturities in light of our liquidity needs. In 1999, we added approximately 34 new loans. Twenty-two of the new loans were office buildings, which resulted in an increase in our carrying value of office building mortgages as illustrated in the following chart. Additionally, in 1999, borrowers paid off one loan, which totaled $9 million.

The following tables set forth by property type and geographic distribution, the carrying value of commercial mortgage loan balances:

Commercial Mortgage Loans by Property Type

December 31,

1999
1998


Carrying
Value
% of
Total
Carrying
Value
% of
Total
($ In Millions)
Office
$ 97
60%
$41
51%
Hotels & Motels
37
23
11
13
Apartments
16
10
25
31
Retail
9
5
1
1
Industrial & Other
3
2
3
4




$162
100%
$81
100%




Commercial Mortgage Loans by Geographic Distribution

December 31,

1999
1998


Carrying
Value
% of
Total
Carrying
Value
% of
Total
($ In Millions)
West
$ 35
22%
$ 13
16%
Midwest
34
21
7
9
Southwest
32
20
28
34
Northeast
31
19
19
23
Mid–Atlantic
21
13
7
9
Southeast
9
5
7
9




$162
100%
$ 81
100%




Residential

Our residential mortgage loan portfolio consists of conventional and FHA/VA mortgage pools. We impose rigorous investment standards, including governmental agency guarantees, seasoned pools, and discount pricing as protection against prepayment risk.

Mortgage Loan Portfolio Surveillance and Under-Performing Investments

We actively monitor, manage and directly service our commercial mortgage loan portfolio. Our personnel perform or review all aspects of loan origination and portfolio management, including:

We revalue all properties each year and re-inspect all properties either each year or every other year based on internal quality ratings.

We use the following criteria to determine whether a current or potential problem exists:

The carrying value of current and potential problem mortgage loans, consisting of restructured mortgage loans, was $10 million at December 31, 1999 and 1998. There were no problem commercial mortgage loans in process of foreclosure, in default or in actively managed properties.

The AVR contains a mortgage loan component, which totaled $7 million at December 31, 1999. In addition, at December 31, 1999, we held other investment reserves on commercial mortgage loans of $2 million. See "Investment Reserves".

 

The following tables set forth current and potential problem mortgage loans by property type and geographic region as of December 31, 1999:

Commercial Mortgage Loan Distribution
by Property Type

   
December 31, 1999
   
   
Total
Loan
Amount
 
Problem
Loan
Amount
 
% of
Loan
Amount
 
   
($ In Millions)
               
Office  
$ 97
$ 10
10%
Hotels&Motels  
37
Apartments  
16
Retail  
9
Industrial & Other  
3



Total  
$162
$ 10
6 %



Commercial Mortgage Loan Distribution
by Geographic Region

   
December 31, 1999
   
   
Total
Loan
Amount
 
Problem
Loan
Amount
 
% of
Loan
Amount
 
               
   
($ In Millions)
               
West  
$ 35
 
 
 
Midwest  
34
 
 
 
Southwest  
32
 
 
 
Northeast  
31
 
$ 10
 
32%
 
Mid-Atlantic  
21
 
 
 
Southeast  
9
 
 
 



Total  
$162
 
$ 10
 
6%
 



Investment Reserves

When we determine that it is probable that the net realizable value of an invested asset is less than our carrying value, we establish and record appropriate write-downs or investment reserves in accordance with statutory practice.

We determine the net realizable value of bonds in accordance with principles established by the SVO using criteria such as:

In the case of real estate and commercial mortgage loans, we make borrower and property-specific assessments as well.

In compliance with regulatory requirements, we maintain the AVR. The AVR stabilizes surplus against non-interest rate related fluctuations in the value of stocks and bonds. We maintain general investment reserves ("GIR") which are not mandated by regulation, in anticipation of future losses on specific mortgage loans, particularly mortgage loans in the process of foreclosure.

Our total investment reserves at December 31, 1999, were $23 million, a 4% decrease from December 31, 1998, consisting of AVR of $21 million and GIR of $2 million.

The following table presents the change in total investment reserves for the years 1999 and 1998:

   
Total Investment Reserves
   
   
Bonds,
Preferred
Stocks and
Short-term
Investments
Mortgage
Loans
Other
Investments
Total
   
(In Millions)
                   
Balance at December 31, 1997 (1)  
$ 5
 
$ 6
 
$16
 
$27
 




Reserve contributions (2)  
2
 
1
 
1
 
4
 
Net realized capital gains (losses) (3)  
 
(1)
 
 
(1)
 
Unrealized capital gains (losses) (4)  
 
 
(6)
 
(6)
 




Net change to shareholder’s equity (5)  
2
 
 
(5)
 
(3)
 




Balance at December 31, 1998 (1)  
7
 
6
 
11
 
24
 




Reserve contributions (2)  
2
 
3
 
(3)
 
2
 
Net realized capital gains (losses) (3)  
(2)
 
 
(4)
 
(6)
 
Unrealized capital gains (losses) (4)  
3
 
 
 
3
 




Net change to shareholder’s equity (5)  
3
 
3
 
(7)
 
(1)
 




Balance at December 31, 1999(1)  
$10
 
$ 9
 
$ 4
 
$23
 




 

(1)  The balance is comprised of the AVR and GIR which are recorded as liabilities on the statement of financial position.

 

   
AVR
GIR
Total
   
(In Millions)
               
Balance at December 31, 1997  
$23
 
$4
 
$27
 
Balance at December 31, 1998  
$22
 
$2
 
$24
 
Balance at December 31, 1999  
$21
 
$2
 
$23
 
               

(2)   Amounts represent contributions calculated on a statutory formula and other amounts we deem necessary. The statutory formula provides for maximums that when exceeded cause a negative contribution. Additionally, these amounts represent the net impact on shareholder’s equity for investment gains and losses not related to changes in interest rates.

(3)  These amounts offset realized capital gains (losses), net of tax, that have been recorded as a component of net income. Amounts include realized capital gains and losses, net of tax, on sales not related to interest fluctuations, such as repayments of mortgage loans at a discount and mortgage loan foreclosures.

(4)  These amounts offset unrealized capital gains (losses), recorded as a change in shareholder’s equity. Amounts include unrealized losses due to market value reductions of securities with a NAIC quality rating of 6 and net changes in the unrealized capital gains and losses from affiliated mutual funds.

(5)  Amounts represent the reserve contribution (note 2) less amounts already recorded (notes 3 and 4). This net change in reserves is recorded as a change in shareholder’s equity.

 

 

 

 

Item 7a. Quantitative and Qualitative Information About Market Risk

We developed the following discussion of our risk-management activities using "forward-looking statements" that are based on estimates and assumptions. While we believe that the assumptions we have made are reasonably possible in the near term, actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. In addition, we would likely take certain actions to mitigate the impacts of the assumed market changes, thereby reducing the negative impact discussed below.

We have excluded all non-guaranteed separate account assets and liabilities from the following discussion since all market risks associated with those accounts are not borne, by us, rather they are assumed by the contract holders.

Our assets, such as bonds, mortgage loans, policy loans and derivatives are financial instruments and are subject to the risk of market volatility and potential market disruptions. These risks may reduce the value of our financial instruments, or impact future cash flows and earnings from those instruments. We do not hold any financial instruments for the purposes of trading.

Our primary market risk exposure is changes in interest rates, which can cause changes in the fair value, cash flows, and earnings of certain financial instruments. To manage our exposure to interest rate changes we use sophisticated quantitative asset/liability management techniques. Asset/liability management allows us to match the market sensitivity of assets with the liabilities they support. If these sensitivities are matched perfectly, the impact of interest rate changes is effectively offset on an economic basis as the change in value of the asset is offset by a corresponding change in the value of the supported liability. In addition, we invest a significant portion of our investment funds in high quality bonds in order to maintain and manage liquidity and reduce the risk of default in the portfolio.

Based upon the information and assumptions we used in our asset/liability analysis as of December 31, 1999, we estimate that a hypothetical immediate 10% increase in interest rates would decrease the net fair value of our financial instruments by $21 million. A change in interest rates of 10% would not have a material impact on our future earnings or cash flows. A significant portion of our liabilities, e.g., insurance policy and claim reserves, are not considered financial instruments and are excluded from the above analysis. Because of our asset/liability management, a corresponding change in the fair values of these liabilities, based on the present value of estimated cash flows, would significantly offset the net decrease in fair value estimated above.

We also use derivative financial instruments to manage our market risks, primarily to reduce interest rate and duration imbalances determined in asset/liability analyses. We do not hold or issue these financial instruments for trading purposes.

The notional amounts described do not represent amounts exchanged by the parties and, thus, are not a measure of our exposure. The amounts exchanged are calculated on the basis of the notional amounts and the other terms of the instruments, which relate to interest rates, exchange rates, security prices, or financial or other indexes.

We utilize interest rate swap agreements, options, and purchased caps and floors to reduce interest rate exposures arising from mismatches between assets and liabilities and to modify portfolio profiles to manage other risks identified. Under interest rate swaps, we agree to an exchange, at specified intervals, between streams of variable rate and fixed rate interest payments. The amount exchanged is calculated by reference to an agreed-upon notional principal amount. We had outstanding swaps with notional amounts of $227 million at December 31, 1999, and $198 million at December 31, 1998.

Options grant us the right to buy or sell a security or enter into a derivative transaction at a stated price within a stated period. Our option contracts have terms of up to ten years. We had option contracts with notional

amounts of $945 million at December 31, 1999, and $961 million at December 31, 1998. Our credit risk exposure was limited to the unamortized costs of $7 million at December 31, 1999, and $8 million at December 31, 1998.

Interest rate cap agreements grant us the right to receive the excess of a referenced interest rate over a stated rate calculated by reference to an agreed upon notional amount. Interest rate floor agreements grant us the right to receive the excess of a stated rate over a referenced interest rate calculated by reference to an agreed upon notional amount. We had agreements with notional amounts of $355 million at December 31, 1999 and 1998.

We utilize asset swap agreements to reduce exposures, such as currency risk and prepayment risk, built into certain assets acquired. Cross-currency interest rate swaps allow investment in foreign currencies, increasing access to additional investment opportunities, while limiting foreign exchange risk. At December 31, 1999, we had open asset swap agreements with notional amounts of $4 million. At December 31, 1998, we did not have any open asset swap agreements.

We enter into forward U.S. Treasury, Government National Mortgage Association ("GNMA") and Federal National Mortgage Association ("FNMA") commitments. We enter into these forward commitments for the purpose of managing interest rate exposure. We generally do not take delivery on these commitments. Instead of taking delivery, we settle these commitments with offsetting transactions. We had outstanding commitments of $15 million at December 31, 1999 and $1 million at December 31, 1998.

We are exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to derivative financial instruments. This exposure is limited to contracts with a positive fair value. The amounts at risk in a net gain position were $4 million at December 31, 1999, and $14 million at December 31, 1998. We monitor exposure to ensure counterparties are credit worthy and concentration of exposure is minimized. Additionally, we obtain collateral positions with counterparties when considered prudent.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Financial statements, in the form required by Regulation S-X, are set forth below. We are not required to file supplementary financial data specified by Item 302 of Regulation S-K.

 
Report of Independent Auditors’
 
To the Board of Directors and Policyholders of
C.M. Life Insurance Company
 
We have audited the accompanying statutory statement of financial position of C.M. Life Insurance Company as of December 31, 1999, and the related statutory statements of income, changes in shareholder’s equity, and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
 
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
As described more fully in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has prepared these financial statements using statutory accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the State of Connecticut Insurance Department, which practices differ from generally accepted accounting principles. The effects on the financial statements of the variances between the statutory basis of accounting and generally accepted accounting principles, although not reasonably determinable, are presumed to be material.
 
In our opinion, because of the effects of the matters discussed in the preceding paragraph, the 1999 financial statements referred to above do not present fairly, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, the financial position of C.M. Life Insurance Company as of December 31, 1999, or the results of its operations or its cash flows for the year then ended.
 
In our opinion, the 1999 statutory financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of C.M. Life Insurance Company at December 31, 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, on the statutory basis of accounting described in Note 1.
 
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
 
Hartford, Connecticut
February 1, 2000

To the Board of Directors and Policyholders of
C.M. Life Insurance Company:

We have audited the accompanying statutory statement of financial position of C.M. Life Insurance Company as of December 31, 1998, and the related statutory statements of income and changes in shareholder's equity, and of cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 1998. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. We have not audited the financial statements of C.M. Life Insurance Company for any period subsequent to December 31, 1998.

As described in Note 1, these financial statements were prepared in conformity with accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the Department of Insurance of the State of Connecticut, which practices differ from generally accepted accounting principles. The effects on the financial statements of the variances between the statutory basis of accounting and generally accepted accounting principles, although not reasonably determinable, are presumed to be material.

In our opinion, because of the effects of the matter discussed in the preceding paragraph, the financial statements audited by us do not present fairly, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, the financial position of C.M. Life Insurance Company as of December 31, 1998, or the results of its operations or its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 1998.

In our opinion, the financial statements audited by us, present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of C.M. Life Insurance Company as of December 31, 1998, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 1998, on the basis of accounting described in Note 1.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Hartford, Connecticut
February 25, 1999

C.M. Life Insurance Company
 
STATUTORY STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION
 
 
       December 31,
       1999      1998
       (In Millions)
 
Assets:          
 
Bonds
    $
     735.0
    $
    683.0
Mortgage loans      225.4      126.3
Other investments      25.6      76.3
Policy loans      120.7      150.4
Cash and short-term investments      182.0      105.7
       
    
 
 
Total invested assets      1,288.7      1,141.7
       
    
 
 
Investment and insurance amounts receivable      33.8      33.9
Federal income tax receivable      7.2      2.1
Transfer due from separate accounts      59.2      34.3
       
    
 
 
           1,388.9      1,212.0
 
 
Separate account assets      1,764.2      1,318.9
       
    
 
 
Total assets
   $ 
3,153.1
    $
2,530.9
       
    
See Notes to Statutory Financial Statements.
 
FF-2
C.M. Life Insurance Company
 
STATUTORY STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION, Continued
 
 
       December 31,
       1999      1998
       ($ In Millions Except
for Par Value)
Liabilities:          
 
Policyholders’ reserves and funds      $1,175.9      $   996.3
Policyholders’ claims and other benefits      4.6      3.8
Payable to parent      50.9      28.8
Asset valuation and other investment reserves      22.7      23.9
Other liabilities      39.5      18.2
       
    
 
           1,293.6      1,071.0
 
Separate account liabilities      1,764.2      1,318.9
       
    
 
Total liabilities      3,057.8      2,389.9
       
    
 
Shareholder’s equity:
 
Common stock, $200 par value
      50,000 shares authorized
      12,500 shares issued and outstanding      2.5      2.5
Paid-in and contributed surplus      68.8      68.8
Surplus      24.0      69.7
       
    
 
Total shareholder’s equity      95.3      141.0
       
    
 
Total liabilities & shareholder’s equity      $3,153.1      $2,530.9
       
    
See Notes to Statutory Financial Statements.
 
FF-3
C.M. Life Insurance Company
 
STATUTORY STATEMENTS OF INCOME
 
 
       Years Ended December 31,
       1999      1998      1997
       (In Millions)
Revenue:               
 
Premium income      $     938.8        $     406.4        $     331.3
Net investment income      85.0        82.4        75.3
Fees and other income      8.4        5.5        7.5
       
       
       
 
Total revenue       1,032.2            494.3            414.1
       
       
       
 
Benefits and expenses:
 
Policyholders’ benefits and payments      332.2        185.2        100.4
Addition to policyholders ’ reserves and funds      518.7        168.8        200.7
Operating expenses      122.0        72.1        49.5
Commissions      82.6        49.6        33.5
State taxes, licenses and fees      9.9        8.1        3.5
       
       
       
 
Total benefits and expenses      1,065.4        483.8        387.6
       
       
       
 
Net gain (loss) from operations before federal income taxes      (33.2 )      10.5        26.5
 
Federal income taxes      2.1        6.8        19.0
       
       
       
 
Net gain (loss) from operations      (35.3 )      3.7        7.5
 
Net realized capital gain (loss)      (8.7 )      (1.1 )      0.1
       
       
       
 
Net income (loss)      $     (44.0 )      $         2.6        $         7.6
       
       
       
See Notes to Statutory Financial Statements.
 
FF-4
C.M. Life Insurance Company
 
STATUTORY STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
 
 
       Years Ended December 31,
       1999      1998      1997
       (In Millions)
 
Shareholder’s equity, beginning of year      $141.0        $113.2        $109.8  
       
       
       
  
 
Increases (decreases) due to:
Net income (loss)      (44.0 )      2.6        7.6  
Change in asset valuation and investment reserves      1.2        2.7        (4.8 )
Change in net unrealized capital gains (losses)      4.0        (5.8 )      0.8  
Capital contribution      –           25.0        –     
Other      (6.9 )      3.3        (0.2 )
       
       
       
  
 
           (45.7 )      27.8        3.4  
       
       
       
  
 
Shareholder’s equity, end of year      $   95.3        $141.0        $113.2  
       
       
       
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Statutory Financial Statements.
 
FF-5
C.M. Life Insurance Company
 
STATUTORY STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 
 
       Years Ended December 31,
       1999      1998      1997
       (In Millions)
 
Operating activities:
Net income (loss)      $   (44.0 )      $       2.6        $       7.6  
Addition to policyholders ’ reserves, funds and policy benefits net of
     transfers to separate accounts
     180.4        44.6        44.2  
Net realized capital (gain) loss      8.7        1.1        (0.1 )
Other changes      14.3        7.8        0.5  
       
       
       
  
Net cash provided by operating activities      159.4        56.1        52.2  
       
       
       
  
 
Investing activities:
Loans and purchases of investments       (486.1 )       (568.6 )       (438.6 )
Sales and maturities of investments and receipts from repayment of
     loans
     403.0        504.8        411.1  
       
       
       
  
 
Net cash used in investing activities      (83.1 )      (63.8 )      (27.5 )
       
       
       
  
 
Financing Activities:
Capital and surplus contribution      –           25.0        –     
       
       
       
  
 
Net cash provided by financing activities      –           25.0        –     
       
       
       
  
 
Increase in cash and short-term investments      76.3        17.3        24.7  
 
Cash and short-term investments, beginning of year      105.7        88.4        63.7  
       
       
       
  
 
Cash and short-term investments, end of year      $   182.0        $   105.7        $     88.4  
       
       
       
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Statutory Financial Statements.
 
FF-6
 
Notes To Statutory Financial Statements
 
C.M. Life Insurance Company (“the Company”) is a wholly-owned stock life insurance subsidiary of Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company (“MassMutual ”). The Company is primarily engaged in the sale of flexible premium universal and variable life insurance and variable annuity products distributed through career agents. The Company is licensed to sell life insurance and annuities in Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia and 49 states (excluding New York).
 
 
1. SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING PRACTICES
 
The accompanying statutory financial statements have been prepared in conformity with the statutory accounting practices, except as to form, of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”) and the accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the State of Connecticut Insurance Department and are different in some respects from financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). The more significant differences are as follows: (a) acquisition costs, such as commissions and other costs directly related to acquiring new business, are charged to current operations as incurred, whereas GAAP would require these expenses to be capitalized and recognized over the life of the policies; (b) statutory policy reserves are based upon the commissioners reserve valuation methods and statutory mortality, morbidity and interest assumptions, whereas GAAP reserves would generally be based upon net level premium and estimated gross margin methods and appropriately conservative estimates of future mortality, morbidity and interest assumptions; (c) bonds are generally carried at amortized cost whereas GAAP generally requires they be reported at fair value; (d) deferred income taxes are not provided for book-tax timing differences as would be required by GAAP; and (e) payments received for universal and variable life products and variable annuities are reported as premium income and changes in reserves, whereas under GAAP, these payments would be recorded as deposits to policyholders’ account balances.
 
In March 1998, the NAIC adopted the Codification of Statutory Accounting Principles ( “Codification”). Codification provides a comprehensive guide of statutory accounting principles for use by insurers in all states and is expected to become effective January 1, 2001. The effect of adopting Codification shall be reported as an adjustment to surplus on the effective date. The Company is currently reviewing the impact of Codification; however, due to the nature of certain required accounting changes and their sensitivity to factors such as interest rates, the actual impact upon adoption cannot be determined at this time.
 
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, as well as disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities, at the date of the financial statements. Management must also make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Future events, including changes in the levels of mortality, morbidity, interest rates, persistency and asset valuations, could cause actual results to differ from the estimates used in the financial statements.
 
The following is a description of the Company’s principal accounting policies and practices.
 
 
a. Investments
 
Bonds are valued in accordance with rules established by the NAIC. Generally, bonds are valued at amortized cost, using the interest method.
 
Mortgage loans are valued at unpaid principal net of unamortized premium or discount. The Company discontinues the accrual of interest on mortgage loans which are delinquent more than 90 days or when collection is uncertain.
 
Other investments include holdings in affiliated mutual funds and preferred stocks and are valued in accordance with rules established by the NAIC. Generally, investments in mutual funds are valued at fair value and preferred stocks in good standing at cost.
 
Policy loans are carried at the outstanding loan balance less amounts unsecured by the cash surrender value of the policy.
 
Short-term investments are stated at amortized cost.
Notes to Statutory Financial Statements, Continued
 
 
In compliance with regulatory requirements, the Company maintains an Asset Valuation Reserve ( “AVR”) and an Interest Maintenance Reserve (“IMR”). The AVR and other investment reserves stabilize surplus against fluctuations in the value of stocks, as well as declines in the value of bonds and mortgage loans. The IMR defers after-tax realized capital gains and losses which result from changes in the overall level of interest rates for all types of fixed income investments and interest related hedging activities. These interest rate related gains and losses are amortized into net investment income using the grouped method over the remaining life of the investment sold or over the remaining life of the underlying asset. Net realized after-tax capital losses of $1.4 million in 1999, and realized after-tax capital gains of $2.6 million in 1998 and $2.0 million in 1997 were deferred into the IMR. Amortization of the IMR into net investment income amounted to $0.5 million in 1999, $0.3 million in 1998 and $0.1 million in 1997. At December 31, 1999, the unamortized IMR deferred was in a net loss position, which in accordance with the regulations, was recorded as a reduction of surplus.
 
Realized capital gains and losses, less taxes, not includable in the IMR, are recognized in net income. Realized capital gains and losses are determined using the specific identification method. Unrealized capital gains and losses are included in surplus.

b. Separate Accounts
 
Separate account assets and liabilities represent segregated funds administered and invested by the Company for the benefit of variable life and annuity contractholders. Assets consist principally of marketable securities reported at fair value. Transfers due from separate accounts represent the policyholders’ account values in excess of statutory benefit reserves. Premiums, benefits and expenses of the separate accounts are reported in the Statutory Statement of Income. The Company receives administrative and investment advisory fees from these accounts.
 
Net transfers to separate accounts of $341.4 million, $121.0 million and $146.5 million in 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively, are included in addition to policyholders’ reserves and funds, in the Statutory Statements of Income.
 
c. Non-admitted Assets
 
Assets designated as “non-admitted” include prepaid agent commissions, other prepaid expenses and the IMR, when in a net loss deferral position, and are excluded from the Statutory Statements of Financial Position. These amounted to $9.9 million and $5.5 million as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively and changes therein are charged directly to surplus.
 
d. Policyholders ’ Reserves and Funds
 
Policyholders’ reserves for life insurance contracts are developed using accepted actuarial methods computed principally on the net level premium, the Commissioners’ Reserve Valuation Method and the California Method bases using the 1980 Commissioners’ Standard Ordinary mortality tables with assumed interest rates ranging from 2.50 to 4.50 percent.
 
Reserves for individual annuities are based on accepted actuarial methods, principally at interest rates ranging from 6.25 to 9.00 percent.
 
e. Premium and Related Expense Recognition
 
Life insurance premium revenue is recognized annually on the anniversary date of the policy. Annuity premium is recognized when received. Commissions and other costs related to the issuance of new policies, and policy maintenance and settlement costs are charged to current operations when incurred.
 
f. Cash and Short-term Investments
 
The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with a maturity of twelve months or less to be short-term investments.
Notes to Statutory Financial Statements, Continued
 
 
     
2. FEDERAL INCOME TAXES
 
Provision for federal income taxes is based upon the Company’s estimate of its tax liability. No deferred tax effect is recognized for temporary differences that may exist between financial reporting and taxable income. Accordingly, the reporting of miscellaneous temporary differences, such as reserves and policy acquisition costs, resulted in effective tax rates which differ from the statutory tax rate.
 
The Company plans to file a separate company 1999 federal income tax return.
 
The Internal Revenue Service has completed its examination of the Company’s income tax returns through the year 1995. The Internal Revenue Service is currently examining the Company’s income tax returns for the years 1996 and 1997. The Company believes adjustments which may result from such examinations will not materially affect its financial position.
 
Federal tax payments were $6.8 million in 1999, $16.9 million in 1998 and $6.8 million in 1997.
   
3.   SHAREHOLDER ’S EQUITY
 
The Board of Directors of MassMutual has authorized the contribution of funds to the Company sufficient to meet the capital requirements of all states in which the Company is licensed to do business. Substantially all of the statutory shareholder’s equity is subject to dividend restrictions relating to various state regulations, which limit the payment of dividends to the shareholder without prior approval. Under these regulations, $14.1 million of shareholder’s equity is available for distribution to the shareholder in 2000 without prior regulatory approval.
 
During 1998, MassMutual contributed additional paid-in capital of $25.0 million to the Company.
 
4.     INVESTMENTS
 
The Company maintains a diversified investment portfolio. Investment policies limit concentration in any asset class, geographic region, industry group, economic characteristic, investment quality or individual investment. In the normal course of business, the Company enters into commitments to purchase privately placed bonds and mortgage loans.
 
a. Bonds
 
The carrying value and estimated fair value of bonds are as follows:

 

     December 31, 1999
     Carrying
Value
   Gross
Unrealized
Gains
   Gross
Unrealized
Losses
   Estimated
Fair
Value
     (In Millions)
  U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S.
    government corporations and agencies
  
$    85.8
    
$     0.3
    
$     2.6
    
$   83.5
 
  Debt securities issued by foreign governments   
        2.5
    
      0.1
    
          –  
    
      2.6
 
  Mortgage-backed securities   
      52.3
    
      0.4
    
      1.6
    
     51.1
 
  State and local governments   
      10.3
    
      0.1
    
      0.4
    
     10.0
 
  Corporate debt securities   
    561.7
    
      3.3
    
     17.7
    
   547.3
 
  Utilities   
     16.5
    
      0.1
    
      0.6
    
     16.0
 
  Affiliates     5.9       0.3          –        6.2  
     
    
    
    
        TOTAL    $ 735.0      $     4.6      $   22.9      $ 716.7  
     
    
    
    

 

FF-9
Notes to Statutory Financial Statements, Continued
 
 
     December 31, 1998
     Carrying
Value
   Gross
Unrealized
Gains
   Gross
Unrealized
Losses
   Estimated
Fair
Value
     (In Millions)
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S.
     government corporations and agencies
   $   69.3      $     1.4      $     0.1      $   70.6  
Debt securities issued by foreign governments    3.2      –         0.1      3.1  
Mortgage-backed securities    57.9      1.6      0.2      59.3  
State and local governments    12.1      0.4      0.2      12.3  
Corporate debt securities    522.6      17.8      3.0      537.4  
Utilities    17.9      0.9      –         18.8  
     
    
    
    
      TOTAL    $683.0      $ 22.1      $  3.6      $701.5  
     
    
    
    
 
The carrying value and estimated fair value of bonds at December 31, 1999, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without prepayment penalties.
 
       Carrying
Value
     Estimated
Fair Value
       (In Millions)
Due in one year or less      $   55.0        $   55.1  
Due after one year through five years      193.9        192.9  
Due after five years through ten years      310.6        299.2  
Due after ten years      79.3        76.2  
       
      
 
           638.8        623.4  
Mortgage-backed securities, including securities guaranteed
    by the U.S. government
     96.2        93.3  
       
      
 
      TOTAL      $735.0        $716.7  
       
      
 
 
Proceeds from sales of investments in bonds were $325.8 million during 1999, $480.4 million during 1998, and $388.8 million during 1997. Gross capital gains of $2.1 million in 1999, $5.0 million in 1998, and $3.8 million in 1997 and gross capital losses of $4.9 million in 1999, $0.9 million in 1998, and $0.5 million in 1997 were realized on those sales, portions of which were deferred into the IMR.
 
b.
Mortgages
 
The Company had restructured loans with book values of $10.3 million and $10.4 million at December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively. These loans typically have been modified to defer a portion of the contractual interest payments to future periods. Interest deferred to future periods was immaterial in 1999, 1998 and 1997.
 
Approximately 60% and 50% of the Company’s commercial mortgage loans at December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively, were loans whose underlying collateral is comprised of office buildings. There were no significant regional concentrations of commercial mortgage loans at December 31, 1999 and 1998.
 
At December 31, 1999, scheduled commercial mortgage loan maturities were as follows: 2000  – $3.3 million; 2001 – $10.2 million; 2002  – $28.6 million; 2003 – $21.5 million; 2004  – $24.4 million; and $74.0 million thereafter.
 
c.
Other
 
Investments in affiliated mutual funds had a cost of $17.4 million in 1999 and $62.4 million in 1998.
Notes to Statutory Financial Statements, Continued
 
 
5. PORTFOLIO RISK MANAGEMENT
 
The Company uses common derivative financial instruments to manage its investment risks, primarily to reduce interest rate and duration imbalances determined in asset/liability analyses. These financial instruments described below are not recorded in the financial statements, unless otherwise noted. The Company does not hold or issue these financial instruments for trading purposes.
 
The notional amounts described do not represent amounts exchanged by the parties and, thus, are not a measure of the exposure of the Company. The amounts exchanged are calculated on the basis of the notional amounts and the other terms of the instruments, which relate to interest rates, exchange rates, security prices or financial or other indexes.
 
The Company utilizes interest rate swap agreements, options, and purchased caps and floors to reduce interest rate exposures arising from mismatches between assets and liabilities and to modify portfolio profiles to manage other risks identified. Under interest rate swaps, the Company agrees to an exchange, at specified intervals, between streams of variable rate and fixed rate interest payments calculated by reference to an agreed-upon notional principal amount. Gains and losses realized on the termination of contracts are deferred and amortized through the IMR over the remaining life of the associated contract. IMR amortization is included in net investment income on the Statutory Statements of Income. Net amounts receivable and payable are accrued as adjustments to net investment income and included in investment and insurance amounts receivable on the Statutory Statements of Financial Position. At December 31, 1999 and 1998, the Company had swaps with notional amounts of $226.5 million and $197.5 million, respectively.
 
Options grant the purchaser the right to buy or sell a security or enter into a derivative transaction at a stated price within a stated period. The Company’s option contracts have terms of up to ten years. The amounts paid for options purchased are amortized into net investment income over the life of the contract on a straight-line basis. Unamortized costs are included in other investments on the Statutory Statements of Financial Position. Gains and losses on these contracts are recorded at the expiration or termination date and are deferred and amortized through the IMR over the remaining life of the option contract. At December 31, 1999 and 1998, the Company had option contracts with notional amounts of $944.5 million and $961.2 million, respectively. The Company’s credit risk exposure was limited to the unamortized costs of $7.0 million and $7.5 million at December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively.
 
Interest rate cap agreements grant the purchaser the right to receive the excess of a referenced interest rate over a stated rate calculated by reference to an agreed upon notional amount. Interest rate floor agreements grant the purchaser the right to receive the excess of a stated rate over a referenced interest rate calculated by reference to an agreed upon notional amount. Amounts paid for interest rate caps and floors are amortized into net investment income over the life of the asset on a straight-line basis. Unamortized costs are included in other investments on the Statutory Statements of Financial Position. Amounts receivable and payable are accrued as adjustments to net investment income and included in the Statutory Statements of Financial Position as investment and insurance amounts receivable. Gains and losses on these contracts, including any unamortized cost, are recognized upon termination and are deferred and amortized through the IMR over the remaining life of the associated cap or floor agreement. At December 31, 1999 and 1998, the Company had agreements with notional amounts of $355.0 million. The Company ’s credit risk exposure on these agreements is limited to the unamortized costs of $0.2 million and $0.5 million at December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively.
 
The Company utilizes asset swap agreements to reduce exposures, such as currency risk and prepayment risk, built into certain assets acquired. Cross-currency interest rate swaps allow investment in foreign currencies, increasing access to additional investment opportunities, while limiting foreign exchange risk. The net cash flows from asset and currency swaps are recognized as adjustments to the underlying assets’ net investment income. Gains and losses realized on the termination of these contracts adjusts the bases of the underlying assets. Notional amounts relating to asset and currency swaps totaled $3.6 million at December 31, 1999. As of December 31, 1998, the Company did not have any open asset swap agreements.
 
The Company enters into forward U.S. Treasury, Government National Mortgage Association ( “GNMA”) and Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA ”) commitments for the purpose of managing interest rate exposure. The Company generally does not take delivery on forward commitments. These commitments are instead settled with offsetting transactions. Gains and losses on forward commitments are recorded when the commitment is closed and deferred and amortized through the IMR over the remaining life of the asset. At December 31, 1999 and 1998, the Company had U. S. Treasury, GNMA and FNMA purchase commitments which will settle during the following year with contractual amounts of $15.4 million and $1.0 million, respectively.
Notes to Statutory Financial Statements, Continued
 
 
The Company is exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to derivative financial instruments. This exposure is limited to contracts with a positive fair value. The amounts at risk in a net gain position were $3.8 million and $14.2 million at December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively. The Company monitors exposure to ensure counterparties are credit worthy and concentration of exposure is minimized. Additionally, collateral positions are obtained with counterparties when considered prudent.
 
     
6. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
 
Fair values are based on quoted market prices, when available. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. These valuation techniques require management to develop a significant number of assumptions, including discount rates and estimates of future cash flow. Derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets or to disclosures by other companies with similar financial instruments. These fair value disclosures do not purport to be the amount that could be realized in immediate settlement of the financial instrument. The following table summarizes the carrying value and fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at December 31, 1999 and 1998.
 
       1999      1998
      Carrying
Value
     Fair
Value
     Carrying
Value
    
Fair
Value
 
    (In Millions)
 
 
        Financial assets
   
Bonds $735.0        $716.7        $683.0      $701.5  
Mortgage loans 225.4        219.7        126.3      126.7  
Other investments 25.6        25.6        76.3      76.3  
Policy loans 120.7        120.7        150.4      150.4  
Cash & short-term investments 182.0        182.0        105.7      105.7  
 
 
        Financial liabilities
   
Investment type insurance contracts
    267.8
       267.8        129.8      132.8  
 
 
        Off-balance sheet financial instruments
   
Interest rate swap agreements
    –   
       (3.1 )      –         2.7  
Financial options
    7.0
       3.7        7.5      9.8  
Interest rate caps & floors
    0.2
       –           0.5      1.6  
Forward commitments
    –  
       15.3        –         1.0  
 
The following methods and assumptions were used in estimating fair value disclosures for financial instruments:
 
Bonds and other investments: The estimated fair value of bonds and other investments is based on quoted market prices when available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are determined by the Company using a pricing matrix.
 
Mortgage loans: The estimated fair value of mortgage loans is determined from a pricing matrix for performing loans and the estimated underlying real estate value for non-performing loans.
 
Policy loans, cash and short-term investments: Fair values for these instruments approximate the carrying amounts reported in the Statutory Statements of Financial Position.
 
Investment-type insurance contracts: The estimated fair value for liabilities under investment-type insurance contracts are determined by discounted cash flow projections.
Notes to Statutory Financial Statements, Continued
 
 
Off-balance sheet financial instruments: The fair values for off-balance sheet financial instruments are based upon market prices or prices obtained from brokers.
    
7. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
 
MassMutual and the Company have an agreement whereby MassMutual, for a fee, furnishes the Company, as required, operating facilities, human resources, computer software development and managerial services. Also, investment and administrative services are provided to the Company pursuant to a management services agreement with MassMutual. Fees incurred under the terms of these agreements were $124.5 million, $74.1 million and $39.7 million in 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. While management believes that these fees are calculated on a reasonable basis, they may not necessarily be indicative of the costs that would have been incurred on a stand-alone basis.
 
The Company cedes a portion of its life insurance business to MassMutual and other insurers in the normal course of business. The Company’s retention limit per individual insured is $15.0 million; the portion of the risk exceeding the retention limit is reinsured with other insurers, including MassMutual. The Company is contingently liable with respect to ceded reinsurance in the event any reinsurer is unable to fulfill its contractual obligations.
 
The Company has a modified coinsurance quota-share reinsurance agreement with MassMutual whereby the Company cedes 75% of the premiums on certain universal life policies. In return, MassMutual pays the Company a stipulated expense allowance, death and surrender benefits, and a modified coinsurance adjustment based upon experience. The Company retains the assets and related reserves for payment of future benefits on the ceded policies. Premium income of $29.8 million, $33.7 million and $35.1 million was ceded to MassMutual in 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. Policyholder benefits of $38.7 million, $38.4 million and $36.9 million were ceded to MassMutual in 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively.
 
The Company also has a stop-loss agreement with MassMutual under which the Company cedes claims which, in aggregate, exceed .22% of the covered volume for any year, with maximum coverage of $25.0 million above the aggregate limit. The aggregate limit was $45.4 million in 1999, $36.9 million in 1998, and $35.6 million in 1997 and it was not exceeded in any of the years. Premium income of $1.3 million, $1.0 million and $1.0 million was ceded to MassMutual in 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively.
   
8. BUSINESS RISKS AND CONTINGENCIES
 
The Company is subject to insurance guaranty fund laws in the states in which it does business. These laws assess insurance companies amounts to be used to pay benefits to policyholders and claimants of insolvent insurance companies. Many states allow these assessments to be credited against future premium taxes. The Company believes such assessments in excess of amounts accrued will not materially affect its financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
 
The Company is involved in litigation arising in and out of the normal course of business, including suits which seek both compensatory and punitive damages. While the Company is not aware of any actions or allegations which should reasonably give rise to any material adverse effect, the outcome of litigation cannot be foreseen with certainty. It is the opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel, that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not materially affect its financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
Notes to Statutory Financial Statements, Continued
 
 
9. AFFILIATED COMPANIES
 
The relationship of the Company, MassMutual and affiliated companies as of December 31, 1999, is illustrated below. Subsidiaries are wholly-owned by MassMutual, except as noted.
 
Parent
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company
 
Subsidiaries of Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company
CM Assurance Company
CM Benefit Insurance Company
C.M. Life Insurance Company
MassMutual Holding Company
MML Bay State Life Insurance Company
MML Distributors, LLC
MassMutual Mortgage Finance, LLC
 
Subsidiaries of MassMutual Holding Company
GR Phelps & Co., Inc.
MassMutual Holding Trust I
MassMutual Holding Trust II
MassMutual Holding MSC, Inc.
MassMutual International, Inc.
MML Investor Services, Inc.
 
Subsidiaries of MassMutual Holding Trust I
Antares Capital Corporation – 80.0%
Charter Oak Capital Management, Inc. – 80.0%
Cornerstone Real Estate Advisors, Inc.
DLB Acquisition Corporation – 91.3%
Oppenheimer Acquisition Corporation – 91.91%
 
Subsidiaries of MassMutual Holding Trust II
CM Advantage, Inc.
CM International, Inc.
CM Property Management, Inc.
HYP Management, Inc.
MMHC Investments, Inc.
MML Realty Management
Urban Properties, Inc.
MassMutual Benefits Management, Inc.
 
Subsidiaries of MassMutual International, Inc.
MassMutual Internacional (Argentina) S.A. – 85%
MassLife Seguros de Vida S. A. – 99.9%
MassMutual International (Bermuda) Ltd.
MassMutual International (Chile) S. A. – 85%
MassMutual International (Luxembourg) S. A. – 85%
 
MassMutual Holding MSC, Inc.
MassMutual Corporate Value Limited – 40.93%
9048  – 5434 Quebec, Inc.
1279342 Ontario Limited
 
Affiliates of Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company
MML Series Investment Fund
MassMutual Institutional Funds
 

Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

No disagreements with accountant on any matter of accounting principles or practices or financial statement disclosure have been reported on a Form 8-K during the twelve month period ended December 31, 1999.

PART III

Item 10.  Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

 

Name (Age at 12/31/99) Position with
C.M. Life; Year
Commenced

Other Positions During
the Past Five Years

     
Lawrence V. Burkett, Jr. (54) Director, since 1996 President and Chief Executive
Officer, C.M. Life 1996-2000
Executive Vice President and
General Counsel, MassMutual since
1993,
Senior Vice President and Deputy
General Counsel, MassMutual 1992-
1993.
Robert W. Crispin (53) President and
Chief Executive Officer,
since 2000
Executive Vice President,
MassMutual since 1999,
Executive Vice President, UNUM
Corporation 1995-1999.
     
Isadore Jermyn (49)

 

Director, since 1998,
Senior Vice President
and Actuary, since 1996
Senior Vice President and
Actuary, MassMutual since 1998,
Senior Vice President and Actuary,
MassMutual 1995-1998,
Vice President and Actuary,
MassMutual 1980 –1995.

Efrem Marder (48)

Director, since 1999

Executive Managing Director, David
L. Babson and Company, Inc., in
2000,
Executive Managing Director,
MassMutual 1989-1999.

James E. Miller (52)

Director and Executive Vice
President–Life Operations,
since 1998

 

Executive Vice President, MassMutual
since 1997 and 1987 - 1996,
Senior Vice President, UniCare Life &
Health 1996-1997.
John V. Murphy (50) Director, since 1999 Executive Vice President, MassMutual
since 1997,
Executive Vice President and Chief
Operating Officer, David L. Babson
and Company, Inc., 1995-1997.
Robert J. O’Connell (56) Director, since 1999 Chairman of the Board of Directors,
in 2000,
President and Chief Executive Officer,
MassMutual since 1999,
Senior Vice President, American
International Group, Inc. 1991-1998,
President and Chief Executive Officer,
AIG Life Companies 1991–1998.
Edward M. Kline (56) Treasurer, since 1997 Treasurer and Vice President,
MassMutual since 1997,
Vice President, MassMutual
since 1989.
Ann F. Lomeli (43) Senior Vice President and
Secretary, since 1999
Senior Vice President,
MassMutual since 1999,
Vice President, Secretary and
Associate General Counsel,
MassMutual 1998-1999,
Vice President, Associate
Secretary and Associate General
Counsel, MassMutual 1996-1998,
Corporate Secretary and Counsel,
Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance
Company 1988-1996.
Stuart H. Reese (44) Executive Vice President -
Investments, since 1999
Executive Vice President, since 1999
Chief Executive Director-Investment
Management, MassMutual since 1997,
Director and Senior Vice President –
Investments, MassMutual 1996-1999
Senior Vice President, MassMutual
1993-1997,

Item 11. Executive Compensation

All of our executive officers also serve as officers of MassMutual and receive no compensation directly from us. Allocations have been made as to such officer's time devoted to duties as our executive officers. None of our officers or Directors received allocated compensation in excess of $100,000.

None of our shares are owned by any executive officer or director. We are a wholly-owned subsidiary of MassMutual.

Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

This item is not applicable since we are wholly owned by MassMutual.

Item 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

Reinsurance and other related party transactions.

As discussed in Item 1 and in the Notes to the Audited Statutory Financial Statements, we have reinsurance and related party transactions. We cede a portion of our life insurance business to MassMutual and other insurers under various reinsurance agreements. In addition, we have an agreement with our parent, MassMutual, whereby MassMutual, for a fee, provides various management services to us.

PART IV

Item 14.  Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K

(a) 1. Financial Statements (set forth in Item 8.):

Reports of Independent Public Auditors’.
Statutory Statements of Financial Position as of December 31, 1999 and 1998.
Statutory Statements of Income for each of the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997.
Statutory Statements of Changes in Shareholder’s Equity for each of the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997.
Statutory Statements of Cash Flows for each of the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997.
Notes to Statutory Financial Statements.

2. Financial Statement Schedules (set forth below):

Reports of Independent Public Auditors’.
Schedule I -
 Summary of Investments - Other than Investments in Related Parties as of December 31, 1999.
Schedule III - Supplementary Insurance Information.
Schedule IV - Reinsurance.
Schedule V - Valuation and qualifying accounts.

All other schedules are omitted because of the absence of conditions under which they are required or because the information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

3.
Exhibit Number
Per Item 601 of
Regulation S-K

Description
of Exhibits

   
3(a)
Charter of C.M. Life Insurance Company. (1)
3(b)
By Laws of C.M. Life Insurance Company. (1)
4(a)
Form of Individual Contract for the Panorama Plus Annuity. (2)

 

(i) Form of IRA Endorsement for the Panorama Plus Annuity Individual Contract. (2)

    

(ii) Form of Terminal Illness Endorsement for the Panorama Plus Annuity Individual Contract. (2)

     

(iii) Form of Tax-Sheltered Annuity Endorsement for the Panorama Plus Annuity Individual Contract. (2)

     

(iv) Form of Qualified Plan Endorsement for the Panorama Plus Annuity Individual Contract. (2)

     

(v) Form of Unisex Endorsement for the Panorama Plus Annuity Individual Contract. (2)

4(b)
Form of Group Contract for the Panorama Plus Annuity. (2)
 
 

     (i) Form of IRA Endorsement for the Panorama Plus Annuity Group Contract. (2)

 

     (ii) Form of Terminal Illness Endorsement for the Panorama Plus Annuity Group Contract. (2)

 

     (iii) Form of Tax-Sheltered Annuity Endorsement for the Panorama Plus Annuity Group Contract. (2)

 

     (iv) Form of Qualified Plan Endorsement for the Panorama Plus Annuity Group Contract. (2)

 

     (v) Form of Unisex Endorsement for the Panorama Plus Annuity Group Contract. (2)

 
4(c)
Form of Individual Certificate for the Panorama Plus Annuity. (2)
 
 

     (i) Form of IRA Endorsement for the Panorama Plus Annuity Individual Certificate. (2)

 

     (ii) Form of Terminal Illness Endorsement for the Panorama Plus Annuity Individual Certificate. (2)

     (iii) Form of Tax-Sheltered Annuity Endorsement for the Panorama Plus Annuity Individual Certificate. (2)

     (iv) Form of Qualified Plan Endorsement for the Panorama Plus Annuity Individual Certificate. (2)

     (v) Form of Unisex Endorsement for the Panorama Plus Annuity Individual Certificate. (2)

4(d)
Form of Application for the Individual Panorama Plus Annuity. (2)
 
4(e)
Form of Application for the Group Panorama Plus Annuity. (2)
 
4(f)
Form of Application Supplement for Panorama Plus Tax Sheltered Annuity. (2)
 
4(g)

Form of Certificate Application Supplement for Panorama Plus Tax Sheltered Annuity. (2)

 
5
Opinion Regarding Legality. (2)
 
10
Agreement to Purchase Shares by and between C.M. Life Insurance Company and Connecticut Mutual Financial Services Series Fund I, Inc. (2)
 
16
Change of independent accountant. (5)
 
23
(i) Report of Independent Auditors (7)
  (ii) Financial Statement Schedules I, II, IV, and V. (7)
  (iii) Consent of Counsel (2)
 
24(a)
Powers of Attorney (6)
       for Edward M. Kline
       John Miller, Jr.
       James E. Miller
       Isadore Jermyn
 
24(b)
Powers of Attorney (3)
     for Efrem Marder,
     John V. Murphy
24(c)
Powers of Attorney (4)
     for Robert J. O ’Connell

      
24(d)
Powers of Attorney (7)
       for Robert W. Crispin,
       Lawrence V. Burkett, Jr.
 
27
Financial Data Schedule (7)
 
  (1)  
Incorporated by reference to the initial registration statement on Form N-4 for the Contracts and Panorama Plus Separate Account (File No. 33-45122) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 16, 1992.
 
  (2)   
Incorporated by reference to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the registration statement on Form N-4 for the Contracts and Panorama Plus Separate Account (File No. 33-45122) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 13, 1992.
 
  (3)  
Incorporated by reference to the Post-Effective Amendment No. l to Registration Statement No. 333-88493 filed in January, 2000.
 
  (4) 
Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to Registration Statement No. 333-41667 filed in April, 1999.
     
  (5)  Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 22, 1999.
     
  (6)  Incorporated by reference to Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 22, 1999
     
  (7)  Filed herewith
   
(1)  One Form 8-K was filed during the third quarter of 1999, however, no form 8-K reports were filed during the fourth quarter of 1999. Report on Form 8-K dated July 22, 1999, disclosed that PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP was dismissed as the Company’s independent certified public accountant and auditor and Deloitte & Touche LLP was appointed the new independent certified public accountant and auditor of the Company.

.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
C.M. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
                      (Registrant)
By: /s/ Robert W. Crispin *
Robert W. Crispin
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: March 28, 2000

/s/ Richard M. Howe
*Richard M. Howe

On March 28, 2000 as Attorney in Fact, pursuant to
Power of Attorney.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signatures
Title
Date
/s/ Robert W. Crispin* President and Chief
Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
March 28, 2000


Robert W. Crispin
/s/ Edward M. Kline* Vice President and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
March 28, 2000


Edward M. Kline
/s/ John Miller Jr.* Vice President and
Comptroller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
March 28, 2000


John Miller, Jr.
/s/ John V. Murphy* Director March 28, 2000


John V. Murphy
 
/s/ Efrem Marder Director March 28, 2000


Efrem Marder
 
/s/ Isadore Jermyn* Director March 28, 2000


Isadore Jermyn
 
/s/ James Miller* Director March 28, 2000


James Miller
 
/s/ Robert J. O’Connell* Director March 28, 2000


Robert J. O’Connell
 
/s/ Lawrence V. Burkett, Jr.* Director March 28, 2000


Lawrence V. Burkett, Jr.
 

/s/ Richard M. Howe

On March 28, 2000 as Attorney in
Fact, pursuant to Power of Attorney.


*Richard M. Howe