Back to GetFilings.com
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|X| Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 or
|_| Transition report pursuant to Section 13 of 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 for the transition period from ______________ to ______________.
Commission file number: 0-27122
ADEPT TECHNOLOGY, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
California 94-2900635
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
3011 Triad Drive, Livermore, California 94551
(Address of principal executive office) (zip code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (925) 245-3400
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Name of each exchange
Title of each class on which registered
------------------- -------------------
None None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, no par value
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
|X| Yes |_| No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. |X|
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |_| Yes |X| No
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by
non-affiliates of the registrant computed by reference to the price at which the
common equity was last sold as of the last business day of the Registrant's most
recently completed second fiscal quarter (December 27, 2002) was $7,260,689.
Shares of common stock held by each officer and director and by each person who
controls 5% or more of the outstanding voting power of the registrant have been
excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination
of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other
purposes.
As of September 19, 2003, approximately 15,409,833 shares of the registrant's
common stock, no par value, was outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant's definitive proxy statement for the 2003 Annual
Meeting are incorporated by reference into Part III hereof.
ADEPT TECHNOLOGY, INC.
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
PART I
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements 2
Item 1. Business 2
Item 2. Properties 13
Item 3. Legal Proceedings 14
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 15
Executive Officers of the Registrant 15
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related
Shareholder Matters 16
Item 6. Selected Financial Data 17
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations 20
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 52
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 52
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting
and Financial Disclosure 53
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures 53
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant 54
Item 11. Executive Compensation 54
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management 54
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions 54
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports of Form 8-K 55
Signatures 59
PART I
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements are contained principally in the sections entitled
"Business," "Factors Affecting Future Operating Results" and "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." These
statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors
which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially
different from any future results, performances or achievements expressed or
implied by the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include,
but are not limited to, statements about:
o the current economic environment affecting us and the markets we
serve;
o sources of revenues and anticipated revenues, including the
contribution from the growth of new products and markets;
o our expectations regarding our cash flows and liquidity impact of
the timing of receipts and disbursements;
o our estimates regarding our capital requirements and our needs for
additional financing;
o marketing and commercialization of our products under development;
o our ability to attract customers and the market acceptance of our
products;
o our ability to establish relationships with suppliers, systems
integrators and OEMs for the supply and distribution of our
products;
o plans for future acquisitions and for the integration of recent
acquisitions;
o plans for future products and services and for enhancements of
existing products and services; and
o our intellectual property.
In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as
"may," "intend," "might," "will," "should," "could," "would," "expect,"
"believe," "estimate," "predict," "potential," or the negative of these terms,
and similar expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements. These
statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and are based
on assumptions and subject to risks and uncertainties. Given these
uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these statements. We
discuss many of these risks in this Annual Report on Form 10-K in greater detail
under the heading "Factors Affecting Future Operating Results." Also, these
statements represent our estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update or
revise these forward-looking statements.
In this report, unless the context indicates otherwise, the terms "Adept," "we,"
"us," and "our" refer to Adept Technology, Inc., a California corporation, and
its subsidiaries.
This report contains trademarks and trade names of Adept and other companies.
Adept has 182 trademarks of which 16 are registered trademarks, some of which
include the Adept Technology logo, HexSight, MetaControls, and FireBlox.
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Our Company
We provide intelligent production automation solutions, components and services
to our customers in many industries including the food,
electronics/communications, automotive, appliance, semiconductor, original
equipment manufacturer, or OEM, and life sciences industries. We utilize our
comprehensive product portfolio of high precision mechanical components, solid
state controllers and application development software (not generally sold
separately) to deliver automation solutions that meet our customer's
increasingly complex manufacturing requirements. We offer our customers a
comprehensive and tailored automation solution that we call Rapid Deployment
Automation that reduces the time and cost to design, engineer and launch
products into high-volume production. Other benefits of our RDA solution include
increased manufacturing flexibility for future product generations, less
customized engineering and reduced dependence on production engineers. We intend
to continue to enhance our RDA capabilities by providing differentiated, value
added integrated systems to further penetrate selected emerging markets. Our
products currently include system design software, process knowledge software,
real-time vision and motion controls, machine vision systems, robot mechanisms,
precision solutions and other flexible automation equipment. In recent years, we
have expanded our robot product lines and developed advanced software and
sensing technologies that have enabled robots to perform a wider range of
functions. In fiscal 2003, we introduced Amps in Base (AIB) Cobra robots, our
highest volume Scara robots which are expected to have a significant positive
impact on our gross margins during fiscal 2004 and beyond.
2
We have experienced declining revenues and incurred operating losses in each of
the last three fiscal years. During this period, we have also consumed
significant cash and other financial resources, and presently have minimal
liquidity. In response to these conditions, we reduced operating costs and
employee headcount, and restructured certain operating lease commitments in
fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2003. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, we
reduced our headcount by an additional 7% of our total employees, which we
expect to fully implement by the second quarter of fiscal 2004. These
adjustments to our operations have significantly reduced our cash consumption
and the aggregate revenue levels necessary to achieve break-even operating
results. In addition, we intend to seek an expansion of our existing working
capital receivables financing facility, or secure an alternative credit facility
to improve our near term liquidity. Furthermore, we continue to pursue outside
debt and equity sources of financing that can provide Adept with a longer term
source of capital and generally improve its balance sheet and financial
stability.
We are in a very precarious cash position, and because of certain regulatory
restrictions on our ability to move certain cash reserves from our foreign
operations to our U.S. operations, we may have limited access to a portion of
our existing cash balances. As of June 30, 2003, we had an aggregate cash
balance of $3.3 million, and a short term receivables financing credit facility
of $1.75 million net, of which $90,000 was outstanding and $1.7 million remained
available under this facility. We currently depend on funds generated from
operating revenue and the funds available through our accounts receivable
financing arrangement to meet our operating requirements. As a result, if our
assumptions are incorrect, we may have insufficient cash resources to satisfy
our obligations in a timely manner during the next twelve months. We expect our
cash ending balance to be approximately $1.8 million as of September 30, 2003.
The decrease in our expected cash balance from June 30, 2003 is primarily due to
increases in prepaid expenses related to insurance premiums, and an expected
loss on operations for the first quarter of fiscal 2004. Recently, we have
managed to finance our operating losses by converting non-cash working capital
items such as accounts receivable and inventory, to cash, and consequently,
these working capital components have been significantly reduced over the last
several quarters. If the company continues to generate a loss on operations, it
will become increasingly difficult to rely on funding these losses by
liquidating working capital. Our ability to sustain operations through fiscal
2004 is predicated upon certain critical assumptions, including (i) that our
restructuring efforts do effectively reduce operating costs as estimated by
management and do not impair our ability to generate revenue, (ii) that we are
able to favorably settle pending litigation related to our San Jose lease,
including both the aggregate amount and the timing of any settlement payments,
(iv) that we will not incur additional unplanned capital expenditures in fiscal
2004, (v) that we will continue to receive funds under our existing accounts
receivable financing arrangement or a new credit facility, (vi) that we will
receive continued timely receipt of payment of outstanding receivables, and not
otherwise experience severe cyclical swings in our receipts resulting in a
shortfall of cash available for our disbursements during any given quarter, and
(vii) that we will not incur unexpected significant cash outlays during any
quarter.
Adept is currently litigating with the landlord of our San Jose facility
regarding our lease obligations for that facility. We have vacated and no longer
pay rent on this facility. We have recorded expenses in the amount of $2.3
million for the remaining unpaid rent associated with this lease; however, we
have not reserved the cash associated with such unpaid rent expenses. Our cash
usage for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 and our expectations for cash usage
for the first two quarters of fiscal 2004 are significantly impacted by our
nonpayment of rent for this facility. If we receive a material adverse judgment
in the San Jose lease litigation and do not have control of the timing of the
payments of any such judgment, we may not have sufficient cash to meet our
obligations and therefore, we may be required to cease operations. For a
description of this litigation, see "Legal Proceedings."
Even if we do not receive an adverse judgment in the San Jose lease litigation,
if the results of our search for additional outside sources of financing are
unsuccessful, or if adequate funds are not available on acceptable terms or at
all and we are unable to achieve our projected revenues or if operating expenses
exceed current estimates, we will be forced to curtail our operations and we may
not be able to take advantage of market opportunities, develop or enhance new
products, pursue acquisitions that would complement our existing product
offerings or enhance our technical capabilities, execute our business plan or
3
otherwise respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated requirements. Even
if we complete a financing, the transaction is likely to involve the incurrence
of debt or issuance of debt or equity securities of Adept, which would dilute
the outstanding equity.
The consolidated financial statements accompanying this Annual Report on Form
10-K have been prepared assuming that Adept will continue as a going concern.
However, the accompanying Independent Auditors' Report states that we have
incurred recurring operating losses, have a net capital deficiency and have
experienced a declining cash balance which have adversely affected our liquidity
and that these conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue
as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments to
reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of
assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the
outcome of this uncertainty.
We completed several acquisitions over the past few years. Evolution of the
business resulting partially from these acquisitions combined with the changing
business environment has rendered our previously reported business segments less
meaningful. As such, effective July 1, 2002, the previously reported segments,
Assembly and Material Handling ("AMH"), Semiconductor, and SILMA Software
segments were reorganized into three new business segments to reflect how
management currently measures Adept's businesses: Components, Solutions, and
Services and Support. Of the previously reported segments, Semiconductor's
business was reorganized into separate businesses that are now categorized in
both Components and Solutions. Additionally, the AMH and SILMA businesses are
now categorized in the Components segment. Service and support for all of our
products are now categorized in the Services and Support segment.
The Components segment provides intelligent automation software and hardware
component products externally to customers and internally to the other two
business segments for support and integration into higher level assemblies.
The Solutions segment takes products purchased from the Components segment
together with products from third parties, and produces an integrated family of
process-ready platforms for the semiconductor, electronics and precision
assembly and other markets, which are driven towards standard offerings.
The Services and Support segment provides support services to our customers
including providing information regarding the use of our automation equipment,
assistance with the ongoing support of installed systems, consulting services
for applications, and training courses ranging from system operation and
maintenance to advanced programming geared for manufacturing engineers who
design and implement automation lines.
We market and sell our products worldwide through more than 200 system
integrators, our direct sales force and OEMs. System integrators and OEMs add
application-specific hardware and software to our products, enabling us to
provide solutions to a diversified industry base, including the food,
communications, electronics, automotive, appliance, semiconductor, and life
sciences industries. Due to a worldwide slowdown in the communications, consumer
electronics, semiconductor and precision assembly markets, our net revenues have
been at significantly lower levels during this fiscal year compared to previous
years.
We were incorporated in California in 1983. Our principal executive offices are
located at 3011 Triad Drive, Livermore, California 94551. Our telephone number
at that address is (925) 245-3400. Our website address is www.adept.com. Our
annual report on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, our current
reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished
pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934
can be accessed, free of charge, at our website as soon as reasonably
practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
Recent Developments
On August 6, 2003, we completed a lease restructuring with Tri-Valley Campus
LLC, the landlord for our Livermore, California corporate headquarters and
facilities. Under the lease amendment, we were released of our lease obligations
for two unoccupied buildings in Livermore and received a rent reduction on the
occupied building from $1.55 to $1.10 per square foot. In addition, the lease
amendment carries liquidated damages in the event of default on the lease
payments equivalent to 1 year of rent obligations on the original lease. In the
event of Adept's bankruptcy or a failure to make payments to the landlord of our
Livermore, California facilities within three days after a written notice from
4
the landlord, a default would be triggered on the lease. In connection with the
lease restructuring, we issued a three year, $3.0 million convertible
subordinated note due June 30, 2006 in favor of the landlord bearing an annual
interest rate of 6.0%. Interest is payable at our option in shares of our common
stock. The note is convertible at any time at the option of the holder into
common stock at a conversion price of $1.00 per share and the resulting shares
carry certain registration and other rights. Payment under the note will be
accelerated in the event of a default, including the insolvency or bankruptcy of
Adept, Adept's failure to pay its obligations under the note when due, Adept's
default on certain material agreements, including the Livermore lease, the
occurrence of a material adverse change with respect to Adept's business or
ability to pay its obligations under the note, or a change of control of Adept
without the landlord's consent. The note is recorded as long term Subordinated
Convertible Note in the accompanying balance sheet.
PRODUCTS AND TECHNOLOGY COMPRISING RAPID DEPLOYMENT AUTOMATION
Overview
Our vision of making factory automation easy to install is called Rapid
Deployment Automation, or RDA. We have developed a product strategy to enable
RDA. This product strategy includes simulation tools to help design automation
systems, application software packages that contain automation process
knowledge, very powerful software and hardware for real-time distributed motion
control and integrated sensing, and a family of mechanisms that address
different applications.
RDA SYSTEM DESIGN
Production PILOT
Adept employs simulation tools to help system integrators and end users to
design automation systems and evaluate product designs for ease of manufacture.
Adept's simulation products allow machines to be modeled with 3D graphics and
then animated in response to software control programs. Mechanisms can be
defined graphically; and the mathematics necessary to animate them, known as
kinematic models, are generated automatically. Dynamics of mechanisms can also
be modeled, which enables machine cycle times to be accurately predicted.
Adept's simulation products can either create new computer aided design (CAD)
geometry for simulations, import CAD models from standard libraries of machines
and peripheral devices, or import models directly from common CAD systems.
Adept Digital Workcell
Adept Digital Workcell allows engineers to program a workcell with actual
production software without the physical robot or cell hardware. Adept Digital
Workcell increases productivity by allowing the user to anticipate cycle times,
logic errors, location errors, collision errors and motor overload errors far
earlier in the development process. In addition, Adept Digital Workcell allows
users to quickly generate alternative conceptual layouts and cycle time
estimates for project proposals.
RDA PROCESS KNOWLEDGE
Adept Assembly Information Manager (AIM)
Assembly Information Manager, or AIM software, simplifies the integration,
programming and operation of automation workcells and lines. AIM accomplishes
this goal by providing a formal method for capturing application specific
process knowledge and then allowing users, even those lacking advanced
programming expertise, to use this embedded knowledge to accomplish a specific
task.
AIM simplifies the implementation of intelligent automation workcells by
combining a point and click graphical user interface with an icon-based
programming method that does not require advanced computer programming skills.
This method combines task-level statements with a high performance, real-time
database and a structure for representing process knowledge.
5
The AIM task level statements allow the developer to specify at a very high
level what operations the workcell is to perform, such as "insert a component
into a socket using vision to correct for irregularities." This command is
automatically coupled with data contained in the real-time database that
specifies the physical aspects of the workcell, such as the location of a part.
The information contained in the databases can be created or downloaded from a
computer or simulation system at any time. Finally, the AIM system automatically
invokes the routines that contain the process knowledge and dictate how the
specified operation will be performed. In this way, an AIM workcell can be
programmed by a person who understands as few as ten process actions rather than
hundreds of programming instructions or thousands of lines of conventional
software code.
We sell several application specific versions of AIM, including MotionWare,
which addresses motion applications such as those requiring sophisticated
conveyor tracking, and VisionWare, which simplifies the use of vision in both
guidance and inspection applications, as well as other packages which address
dispensing, packaging, flexible part feeding, semiconductor wafer handling and
precision assembly bonding operations. In addition, end users and system
integrators, many of whom have developed their own AIM application-specific
packages, can add process knowledge. AIM can be accessed via the Windows 98,
2000, NT, and XP environments. AIM programs are written in the V+ language.
RDA REAL-TIME CONTROL
AdeptWindows
The AdeptWindows software application suite provides a PC user interface for
Adept controllers plus additional capabilities that allow customers to
effectively integrate their Microsoft Windows-based PC with Adept's robots or
AdeptVision systems. In addition to the PC user interface, the suite of programs
includes a TFTP server for booting the controller over an ethernet network, and
a DDE server that allows customers to communicate with other DDE-capable
applications such as Microsoft Excel.
Adept DeskTop
The Adept DeskTop is a new Microsoft Windows application that provides an
easy-to-use software development environment for Adept controllers and further
enhances the ability to interface a PC to an Adept controller. The development
environment is built on top of a library of ActiveX controls that can be
accessed directly by C, C++, or Visual Basic PC applications to monitor and
control an Adept robot, motion control, or vision system in real time.
Adept AWC Controllers
Our controller products are currently based on the VersaModule Eurocard, or VME,
bus architecture standard, but are migrating to a distributed control
architecture which depends on high-speed networks such as IEEE 1394 FireWire,
Ethernet, and DeviceNet, to link processors and sensors which may be distributed
around a workcell. A large array of controller configurations are possible
depending on the features selected by the customer. Our VME controllers are
configured in four, five, or ten slot chassis. All controllers include a system
processor module. Additional functionality can be incorporated by adding printed
circuit boards and additional software. For example, motion control is added by
inserting a motion control board. Printed circuit boards can be added for
machine vision and additional communication inputs and outputs. The controller
products are sold independently for machine control and inspection vision
applications and are also sold as a component of the robot systems. The heart of
our VME machine controllers is the AdeptWindows Controller board, or AWC, a
single slot central processing unit board based on Motorola 68040/060
processors. All AWC boards include solid-state, mass storage, direct ethernet
connectivity, DeviceNet industrial data network connectivity and international
safety circuitry.
Our AWC controller offers plug-and-play integration of personal computer
hardware and software for users of the Windows platform. Specifically, this new
technology allows customers to do all development work, including vision
applications, on personal computers using Windows 98, NT, 2000, and XP operating
systems. This open architecture product allows customers to combine the features
of our AIM and V+ software products with other personal computer-based software
products using industry standard software tools such as Active X, Visual Basic,
and Visual C++. Finally, all of our controller products support the same
Windows-based graphical user interface and can execute the same application
programs, thereby allowing software development investments to be leveraged
across a number of applications.
6
The controller includes a number of technologically advanced capabilities
designed specifically to address the intelligent automation market. These
capabilities include special application specific integrated circuits for
controlling direct-drive motors, reading encoders, or sensors, and controlling
power up sequencing of complex high power systems. The controller also includes
safety circuits that meet domestic and international specifications and
technology to protect the controller from voltage spikes, electrical noise and
power brownouts. Additionally, the controller features high wattage switching
power amplifiers, and networking circuitry for local area network and industrial
data networks.
Distributed Control Architecture
Adept invested heavily in developing an industrially robust network technology.
We have implemented Adept SmartServo(TM), a digital servo network for our robot
and motion control products. Adept SmartServo is based on the IEEE-1394
standard, also known as FireWire(R). Initial products were introduced in 1999,
with the announcement of Adept SmartModules. The product line has since grown to
include a family of controllers, amplifiers, motors and SmartServo enabled
mechanisms that replace most of the traditional control and power electronics
architecture with a digital servo network.
The impact to the product line has been sweeping. The traditional panel-mounted
power amplifiers and their attendant rack chassis and power supply, have been
replaced by SmartAmps. These self-contained single channel power amplifiers,
with an on-board digital signal processor (DSP), are mounted directly on (or in)
the mechanism. The Adept SmartServo architecture is a distributed processing
network architecture, where the controller's CPU runs the trajectory planner,
while the servo loop is closed in the SmartAmp. This processing scheme delivers
high performance and flexibility, but also demands a highly deterministic time
based network.
In traditional robot architecture, there are heavy multi-conductor cables and
connections between the controller's motion control board and the power amps,
and between the power amps and the robot mechanism. These cables and the
traditional motion control / interface board are now replaced by the Adept
SmartServo network and its twisted pair physical layer.
In addition, the Adept SmartServo digital servo network also becomes the means
to add controller features. In a traditional architecture, the controller
included expansion slots and their attendant power supply capacity, connectors,
rack space and increased footprint. Now, additional features such as digital
I/O, general purpose motion control and additional SmartServo mechanisms can be
added by simply connecting the module directly to the network.
Adept SmartController
Our newest controller, the Adept SmartController, is designed to work with the
Adept SmartServo(TM) distributed servo control network. SmartControllers offer
reduced costs, the smallest form factor in the industry, and simplified
installation, wiring, and support costs while maintaining compliance with
domestic and international safety specifications. The Adept SmartController CS
is the first member of a new family of high performance distributed motion and
vision controllers. The SmartController's network control architecture leverages
Adept's SmartAmp technology, which increases system scalability and modularity
while dramatically reducing controller size and cabling up to 70% from Adept's
industry leading MV controller family. The SmartController's distributed
processing architecture improves performance by freeing up 30% more of the
processor's resources. The Adept SmartController CS comes fully configured for
standard applications that do not require vision or conveyor belt tracking. The
Adept SmartController CX includes an expansion slot for AdeptVision sAVI
together with additional communication ports, conveyor belt tracking support and
more CPU capacity. All Adept SmartControllers feature several high-speed
communication interfaces, including Fast Ethernet and SmartServo. SmartServo is
Adept's new IEEE 1394-FireWire based communication interface, which is the
backbone of Adept's new distributed controls architecture. All Adept
SmartControllers offer known scalability and support for Adept's SmartServo
compatible digital I/O and general motion expansion modules.
7
Adept V+
Our V+ real-time programming language allows software developers to create
automation software systems and is the key enabling technology for our
intelligent automation approach. This programming environment provides a
high-level language coupled with a multitasking operating system and built-in
capability for integrating robots, machine vision, sensors, workcell control and
general communications. These capabilities enable the development of
sophisticated application software that can adaptively control mechanical
systems based upon real-time sensory input while simultaneously maintaining
communication with other factory equipment.
V+ offers the user approximately 300 instructions for programming an intelligent
automation workcell. It includes a trajectory generator and continuous path
planner, which compute the path of the robot's tool in real-time based upon
predefined data or sensory input. V+ also includes a number of network
communication facilities and supports a variety of standard communication
protocols. In addition, this software includes an operating system specifically
designed for factory automation and robot control. This operating system allows
V+ to execute dozens of tasks concurrently and permits control to pass between
tasks in a predictable manner, often several times per millisecond. The V+
operating system also allows the installation of additional processors into the
controller and automatically reassigns tasks to optimize overall system
performance, providing a key scalability feature not found in other controllers.
The primary development environment for V+ is Windows 98, NT, 2000 and XP based
and allows the customer to utilize industry standard personal computers.
Adept Vision
AdeptVision is a line of machine vision products that are used for robot
guidance and inspection applications. For guidance applications, AdeptVision is
added into the controller by inserting a printed circuit board and enabling the
vision system software. The integration of our controller and vision systems
software enables high speed vision applications such as vision servoing. For
inspection applications such as gauging and dimensioning, the AdeptVision
product is sold as an integrated inspection vision system comprised of a
controller with the vision board and software.
AdeptVision features a unique tool for robot and machine guidance, the Adept
ObjectFinder 2000. ObjectFinder quickly and robustly recognizes parts that are
randomly positioned and have an unknown orientation ranging up to 360 degrees.
Our vision servoing ability is critical for precision processes such as the
assembly of electronic or fiber optic components. Our machine vision software
can also measure part dimensions for inspection purposes. Machine vision can be
used to acquire parts from stationary locations or from conveyors. Cameras can
be fixed in the workcell or attached to a robot.
We also offer HexSight, a shrink-wrapped library of machine vision software
tools for OEMs and dedicated machine vision integrators. HexSight includes the
ObjectFinder locator tool in addition to other general purpose image enhancement
and analysis algorithms. These tools run directly in a PC environment and can be
adapted to run in an OEM's custom software solution.
RDA MECHANICAL COMPONENTS
We provide a large number of automation mechanisms to address different
application needs. All of these mechanisms are controlled by the software and
hardware control architecture described below. This broad product line allows
system integrators and end users to develop automation solutions for many
industries and applications.
Robot Mechanisms
We offer two floor standing Selective Compliance Assembly Robot Arm, or SCARA,
style robot mechanisms called the AdeptOne-XL and the AdeptThree-XL. We have
recently introduced two updated table top robot mechanisms called the Adept
Cobra s600 and s800, each of which is designed for assembly and material
handling tasks. SCARA robots utilize a combination of rotary and linear joints
for high speed, high precision material handling, assembly and packaging. The
Adept-XL robots use direct-drive technology. Direct-drive technology eliminates
gears and linkages from the drive train of the mechanism, thereby significantly
increasing robot speed and precision and improving the robot's product life,
reliability and accuracy. The Adept family of Cobra series robots consists of
light-duty SCARA mechanisms that can be table mounted and offer an efficient
range of motions in limited space. The new versions of the sCobra robots feature
IEEE-1394 Firewire-based MotionBlox technology. The Motionblox technology
8
packages the local servo control capabilities, digital I/O capabilities,
integrated DC Power with Safety, and integrated high power amplifiers together
on the back of the sCobra mechanism. The result of combining a local controller
and I/O integration with the robot SCARA mechanism is a degree of flexibility
that is not currently available from other automation suppliers. The sCobra
robots can be connected to the SmartController for integration motion and Vision
or multi-mechanism configurations. When the MotionBlox and sCobra mechanism are
configured standalone, this configuration is called the SmartCobra. The
SmartCobra is a controller-less mechanism with basic pick and place
capabilities.
We also offer a family of linear modules called Adept SmartModules. These single
axis devices can be coupled together by the user to form application specific
custom robot mechanisms ranging from 2 to 4 axes. Adept SmartModules are powered
by Adept SmartAmps, which utilize the industry standard IEEE 1394 FireWire
protocol and Adept's SmartServo architecture to combine motion control signals
and input/output signals for transmission over a single high-speed cable. Adept
SmartModules lower costs and installation time increasing modularity and
reducing the amount of software programming and cabling required in a workcell,
or a robotic system that performs a specific automation function. SmartModules
are also offered in single-axis standalone versions, which can operate without
any additional controllers, saving cost and space for simple applications.
We also offer a line of semiconductor wafer handling robots. The newest member
of Adept's wafer handling robots is the AWARD robot. This mechanism has been
designed to take advantage of the SmartServo architecture and shares the
MotionBlox technology used on the sCobra mechanisms. The AWARD is a direct drive
robot and shares the same benefits as the other Adept direct drive robots in
terms of performance and reliability. Adept will offer the AWARD in both 3 and 4
axis configurations. In working with OEM semiconductor tool manufacturers Adept
is focused on providing the base technology to provide cost effective
configurations as well as expandable features so that more custom configurations
can also be met. An AWARD mounted on a linear track is one example of these more
customizable configurations. SmartAmp technology makes these types of product
configurations quick to configure and is a reliable way to extend the AWARD
robots functionality. The AWARD addresses the needs for both 200mm and 300mm
tool wafer handling needs.
Adept continues to offer the AdeptVicron series. This is a VME-based mechanism
that is designed for semiconductor wafer handling applications and consists of
two models: the AdeptVicron 300S (single arm) and 310D (dual arm) models, which
handle up to 300mm wafers.
Our robot mechanisms product line includes a family of 6 axis articulated
mechanisms manufactured for us by Yaskawa Corporation. The AdeptSix 300 is a
tabletop robot well suited for precision assembly and material handling
applications. The AdeptSix 600 is a larger floor mount robot for material
handling and packaging applications. Both of these mechanisms run off the
SmartServo technology. In fiscal 2003, we added a new clean room version of the
AdeptSix 300, the AdeptSix 300CR. This mechanism brings the capabilities and
flexibility of a 6 axis mechanism to the Semiconductor wafer handling market.
High Precision Micro Positioners
Adept NanoStages are a series of advanced nanometer positioners for alignment
applications in fiber optic assembly and other high precision applications.
These devices increase the resolution of our mechanisms by a factor of 1000,
from 25 microns for our standard robots to 25 nanometers for our standard micro
positioners. To demonstrate the precision of the resolution for our micro
positioners, the period at the end of the preceding sentence is approximately
225 microns, or 225,000 nanometers, in size. Our micro positioners are capable
of resolutions nearly 9,000 times smaller than the size of that period. Unlike
many micro positioners, which were developed for laboratory environments, these
products are durable, rigid, production-ready devices intended for integration
into continuous production factory environments. We offer various configurations
of Adept NanoStages ranging from one to six axes of motion for disc drive
assembly, semiconductor OEM applications, fiber optic component assembly, fiber
alignment, and laser welding.
Programmable Parts Feeder
Part feeding has historically been accomplished by designing custom devices that
could only accommodate a single part or class of parts. The Adept FlexFeeder 250
can be rapidly reconfigured through software to accommodate new products and a
9
wide variety of parts ranging from simple rectangular objects to complex molded
or machined parts, thus preserving the flexibility of the workcell or production
line. The Adept FlexFeeder 250 integrates machine vision, software and motion
control technology with a simple mechanical device for separating parts from
bulk bins. The Adept FlexFeeder 250 recirculates the parts and separates them,
relying on vision to identify individual parts.
RDA PRECISION SOLUTIONS
In response to end customer and system integrator needs, we now offer a family
of process ready platforms for the semiconductor and electronics markets. These
platform offerings include Flexible Front End and Wafer Loader systems for the
semiconductor tool market, Adept NanoCell for the precision assembly market,
Adept ChadIQ for electronics assembly and Adept NanoBonder EBS for epoxy bonding
of precision components. These platform offerings integrate all automation
components on a single control architecture, with a unified graphical user
interface. Typical systems include a material handling mechanism such as
SmartModules or AdeptSix robot, AdeptWindows or Adept SmartController,
AdeptVision, AIM software and an integrated PC user interface. Application
specific components range from NanoStage positioner, semiconductor tool
loadports, and additional control and network interfaces.
We offer semiconductor wafer handling solutions for both front-end and back-end
process OEMs. These offerings include both standard and customized products for
contamination control including robotics for wafer handling and transport. The
Adept Flexible Front End Systems and the Adept Wafer Loader Systems, including
the Adept FFE 200 and the Adept FFE 300, combine wafer sorting and handling,
wafer cassette load ports, wafer aligners and mappers, and wafer ID functions
into one compact integrated system; reducing cycle times, process complexity and
cost. Combining value-added wafer operations such as wafer orientation, optical
character recognition sort and merge into a compact front-end system, eliminates
the need for wafer sorters in the factory.
Our OEMs, system integrators and end users can quickly configure these standard
platforms to add specific manufacturing processes. Platform products represent a
further extension of our RDA strategy. For industries where high volumes of a
similar basic machine are needed, an integrated platform eliminates the time and
cost of designing equipment frames, assembling and validating control and
mechanism products and developing and debugging generic control software.
Financial information regarding our three business segments is included in Note
13 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
Customers
We sell our products to system integrators, end users and OEMs. End users of our
products include a broad range of manufacturing companies in the food,
communications, automotive, appliance, semiconductor, and life sciences
industries. These companies use our products to perform a wide variety of
functions in assembly, material handling and precision process applications,
including mechanical assembly, printed circuit board assembly, dispensing and
inspection. No customer accounted for more than 10% of our revenues for any of
the past three fiscal years.
SALES, DISTRIBUTION AND MARKETING
Sales and Distribution
We market our products through system integrators, our direct sales force and
OEMs.
System Integrators. We ship a substantial portion of our products through system
integrators, and we view our relationships with these organizations as important
to our success. We have established relationships with over 200 system
integrators worldwide that provide expertise and process knowledge for a wide
range of specific applications. In the United States and Europe these
relationships are generally nonexclusive and not limited to specific
geographical territories. In certain other international markets, Adept's
integrator relationships may include limited exclusive arrangements for a
limited geographical territory in which the integrator markets and supports
Adept functions directly. Generally a system integrator can purchase both
standard and non-standard Adept solutions and components as opposed to OEM
arrangements where generally one standard component or solution is purchased in
higher volumes.
10
OEMs. Our OEM customers typically purchase one standard product configuration,
which the OEM integrates with additional hardware and software and sells under
the OEM's label to other resellers and end users. Unlike our system integrator
channel, OEMs are responsible for all marketing, sales, customer support and
maintaining the associated spare parts to service the end users of the product.
Direct Sales Force. We employ a direct sales force which directs its sales
efforts to end users to communicate the capabilities of our products and support
services and obtain up-to-date information regarding market requirements. Our
sales force possesses expertise in automation solutions and advises end users on
alternative production line designs, special application techniques, equipment
sources and system integrator selection. Our sales force works closely with
system integrators and OEMs to integrate our product line into their systems,
provides sales leads to certain system integrators and obtains intelligent
automation system quotes from system integrators for end users. As of June 30,
2003, our North American direct sales force included 11 employees. We have four
North American sales and customer support offices located in Livermore,
California; Southbury, Connecticut; Cincinnati, Ohio; and Dallas, Texas. As of
June 30, 2003, our international sales organization included seven persons
covering Europe, Singapore, South Korea, China and Taiwan.
Some of our larger manufacturing end user customers, to whom we sell directly,
have in-house engineering departments that are comparable to a captive system
integrator. These end user customers establish a corporate integrator
relationship with us offering benefits similar to those provided to our
integrator distribution channel, however we may in some cases form strategic
alliances for certain potentially high volume market opportunities with greater
benefits and restrictions to the customer than exist in system integrator
arrangements.
Financial information regarding revenue derived from domestic and international
customers based upon geographic area is included in Note 13 of our Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Marketing
Our marketing organization, which consisted of 10 employees as of June 30, 2003,
supports our system integrators, direct sales force, OEM and end user customers
in a variety of ways. Our product management group works with end users, system
integrators, corporate integrators and our sales engineers to continually gather
input on product performance and end user needs. This information is used to
enhance existing products and to develop new products. Our marketing programs
group generates and qualifies new business through industry trade shows, various
direct marketing programs such as direct mail and telemarketing, public
relations efforts, internet marketing and advertising in industry periodicals.
This marketing team is responsible for tracking customers and prospects through
our marketing database. Our marketing group also publishes a document called the
MV Partner catalog, which lists software and hardware components that we have
certified as compatible with our product line. We also expend considerable
effort on the development of thorough technical documentation and user manuals
for our product line, including online access. We view well-designed manuals as
critical to simplifying the installation, programming, use and maintenance of
our products.
Services and Support
Our service and support organization, which consisted of 39 full-time employees
as of June 30, 2003, is designed to support our customers from the design of our
automation line through ongoing support of the installed system. This
organization includes approximately seven consulting and application
engineers/programmers based in several of our sales and customer support offices
in the United States, Europe and Asia. This team is experienced in applying our
product line to solve a wide array of application issues and operates toll-free
telephone support lines to provide advice on issues such as software programming
structure, layout problems and system installation. End users and system
integrators can also hire these experts on a consulting basis to help resolve
new or difficult application issues.
We also maintain product training personnel, consisting of two individuals as of
June 30, 2003, who develop and deliver training courses on subjects ranging from
basic system maintenance to advanced programming. These courses are geared both
11
for manufacturing engineers who design and implement automation lines and for
operators who operate and maintain equipment once it is in production, and are
taught in Adept offices and customer sites throughout the world.
Our field service organization, which consisted of seven persons as of June 30,
2003, maintains and repairs our products at the end user's facilities. Personnel
based at our service centers also provide advice to customers on spare parts,
product upgrades and preventative maintenance. In addition, we provide fee-based
service resources located inside some key customers' facilities when the amount
of Adept product inside the customers production facility or the critical nature
of the process warrants the expense of a full-time service resource.
Backlog
Our product backlog at June 30, 2003 was approximately $8.8 million, as compared
with approximately $6.0 million at June 30, 2002.
Although we experienced a decline in orders during fiscal 2003 reflecting
continued softness across most of the industries we serve, orders in the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2003 increased approximately 10% compared to orders for the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2002. In addition, we deferred the recognition of
revenue on several orders in our Solutions business segment pending receipt of
final acceptance from customers, which we anticipate receiving in the first
quarter of fiscal 2004. The deferral of Solutions revenue combined with the
increased order activity in the fourth quarter contributed to the change in
backlog at June 30, 2003 as compared to June 30, 2002.
Because orders constituting our current backlog are subject to changes in
delivery schedules and in certain instances may be subject to cancellation
without significant penalty to the customer, our backlog at any date may not be
indicative of demand for our products or actual net revenues for any period in
the future.
Research and Development
Our research and development efforts are focused on the design of intelligent
automation products, which address the challenges of designing, implementing,
installing, operating and modifying flexible automated production lines. We
intend to focus our research and development efforts on the development of an
integrated product line, which further implements our RDA approach and which
reduces cost, enhances performance and improves ease of use. We carry out
primary research and development activities in four locations; Livermore, Orange
and Los Angeles, California and Quebec, Canada. In addition, we utilize several
individuals who work remotely to contribute to the development of our software
for motion and vision control.
Research and development activities at Livermore, California are focused on
design of our motion and vision control boards and the mechanisms that utilize
them. We design and develop our motion control software at the Los Angles
facilities and the vision software is designed and developed in our Quebec,
Canada facilities. In addition, we design and develop process and higher level
subassemblies for particular applications, such as semiconductor wafer handling,
at both our Livermore and Orange, California locations.
We have devoted, and, despite our expense reductions in connection with our
restructuring, intend to devote in the future, a significant portion of our
resources to research and development programs. As of June 30, 2003, we had 57
persons engaged in research, development and engineering. Our research,
development and engineering expenses were approximately $11.7 million for 2003,
$20.4 million for 2002 and $22.7 million for 2001 and represented 26.1% of net
revenues for 2003, 35.8% for 2002 and 22.7% for 2001.
Manufacturing
Adept's manufacturing operations, which are located in Livermore California, are
utilized for product assembly, integration and test. Adept's operations include
manufacturing, test, materials, and manufacturing/test engineering departments.
We strategically outsource sub-components of our systems, including electronics
assemblies and mechanical mechanisms. We partner with key suppliers on
Adept-specific designs and are continually moving the manufacturing department
12
away from basic assembly and towards mission-critical system integration and
testing. Our manufacturing engineering organization develops detailed
instructions for all manufacturing and test operations. These instructions are
established in writing, implemented through training of the manufacturing
workforce and monitored to assure compliance. In addition, our manufacturing
organization works closely with our suppliers to develop instructions, test
methods and to remedy quality problems if they arise.
For quality assurance practices Adept is in transition from its prior ISO 9002
certification to the new ISO 9001-2000 standard. The ISO 9002 standard focused
on quality system requirements for a company's production, delivery and
servicing of products and services around the world. The new ISO 9001-2000
standard focuses on the design and release process, all process efficiencies and
emphasizes customer satisfaction in addition to the areas focused by the ISO
9002 standard. Adept also utilizes a Quality Steering Committee comprised of
senior management from manufacturing, engineering, quality, customer service and
materials to continually review internal and external quality and focus the
organization on continuous improvement and effective corrective action
methodologies.
Employees
At June 30, 2003, we had 242 employees worldwide. Of the total, 57 were engaged
in research and development, 47 in sales and marketing, 39 in service and
support, 77 in operations, and 22 in finance and administration.
Competition
The market for intelligent automation products is highly competitive. We compete
with a number of robot companies, motion control companies, and machine vision
companies. Many of our competitors in the robot market are integrated
manufacturers of products that produce robotics equipment internally for their
own use and may also compete with our products for sales to other customers.
Our principal competitors in the assembly robot and linear modules markets
include subsidiaries of Japanese companies, including Fanuc Ltd, Epson
Corporation, Yamaha Corporation, Denso Corporation and Intelligent Actuator. We
also compete with a narrow group of European companies, principally Robert Bosch
GmbH, and some divisions of Parker Hannifin. In the material handling robot
market, we compete with the above companies, as well as manufacturers of 6-axis
robots including Motoman, Kawasaki Robotics, Inc., Reis Robotics, Kuka Robotics,
Staubli Corporation and ABB Group.
Competition for certain products in the semiconductor atmospheric wafer handling
and contamination control markets comes from Brooks-PRI Automation, Asyst
Technologies, Inc, Yaskawa Electric and Kawasaki. Brooks has the largest
installed base of Atmospheric robots, and Asyst is the leader in isolation
technology and 200 millimeter and 300 millimeter load ports.
Our principal competitors in the market for motion control system include
Allen-Bradley Co., a subsidiary of Rockwell International Corporation, in the
United States, and Siemens AG in Europe. In addition, we face motion control
competition from three major suppliers of motion control boards, Galil Motion
Control, Inc., Motion Engineering, Inc. and Delta Tau Data Systems, Inc. OEM's
and end users who engineer their own custom motion control systems purchase
these motion control boards. In the machine vision market, our primary
competition is from Cognex Corporation and DVT Corporation.
Intellectual Property
We primarily pursue patent, trademark and copyright protection for our
technology and products. We currently hold 11 patents, which include eight
patents in the United States and three patents outside of the United States.
Additionally, we have six pending patent applications in the United States.
There can be no assurance that patents will be issued from any of these pending
applications or that any claims in existing patents, or allowed from pending
patent applications, will be sufficiently broad to protect our technology.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Our headquarters are located in a 75,000 square foot building we lease in
Livermore, California. On August 6, 2003, we completed a lease restructuring
13
with Tri-Valley Campus LLC, the landlord for our Livermore, California corporate
headquarters and facilities, which is expected to significantly reduce our
quarterly lease expenses. Under the lease amendment, we were released of our
lease obligations for two unoccupied buildings in Livermore and received a rent
reduction on the occupied building from $1.55 to $1.10 per square foot. In
addition, the lease amendment carries liquidated damages in the event of default
on the lease payments equivalent to 1 year of rent obligations on the original
lease. As amended, the lease expires in May 2011 and obligates us to lease
payments of approximately $1.0 million in fiscal 2004 and increases at a rate of
4.0% annually on June 1st of each year. Until March 2003, we were headquartered
in a leased 92,000 square foot building in San Jose, California. In March 2003,
we vacated our headquarters in San Jose and consolidated our corporate
headquarters into our Livermore facilities. We lease a facility in Los Angeles,
California for certain research and development activities, which expires in
2006 and obligates us to payments of $130,000 in fiscal 2004. We lease a 10,500
square foot facility in Quebec City, Canada for certain machine vision sales,
research and development activities. The lease expires in 2009 and obligates us
to payments of approximately $94,000 in fiscal 2004. We also lease facilities
for sales and/or customer training in Southbury, Connecticut; Southfield,
Michigan; Charlotte, North Carolina; Cincinnati, Ohio; Dallas, Texas; Massy,
France; Dortmund, Germany; and Singapore. All of our properties are used by each
of our three reportable business segments.
Adept is currently litigating with the landlord of our San Jose facility
regarding our lease obligations for that facility. See "Item 3. Legal
Proceedings." As we have vacated and no longer pay rent on this facility, we
have recorded expenses in the amount of $2.3 million for the remaining unpaid
rent associated with this lease; however, we have not set aside the cash
associated with such unpaid rent expenses, thus in the event that we receive a
material adverse judgment in the San Jose lease litigation and do not have
control of the timing of the payment of any such judgment, we may not have
sufficient cash to meet such obligations and therefore, we may be required to
cease operations.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In May 2003, DL Rose Orchard, L.P., owner of the property leased by Adept at 150
Rose Orchard Way and 180 Rose Orchard Way in San Jose, California, filed an
action against Adept in Santa Clara Superior Court (NO. CV817195) alleging that
Adept breached the leases for the Rose Orchard Way properties by ceasing rent
payments and vacating the property. The complaint makes a claim for unspecified
damages for unpaid rent through April 2003, the worth at the time of the award
of rent through the balance of the leases, an award of all costs necessary to
ready the premises to be re-leased and payment of its costs and attorney's fees.
Adept answered the complaint on July 15, 2003. Since filing the complaint,
plaintiff has disclosed in court filings that it claims estimated damages
exceeding $2.9 million. Adept is vigorously defending the lawsuit.
From time to time, we are party to various legal proceedings or claims, either
asserted or unasserted, which arise in the ordinary course of our business. We
have reviewed pending legal matters and believe that the resolution of these
matters, other than the above noted legal action, will not have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Adept has in the past received communications from third parties asserting that
we have infringed certain patents and other intellectual property rights of
others, or seeking indemnification against alleged infringement.
Some end users of our products have notified us that they have received a claim
of patent infringement from the Jerome H. Lemelson Foundation, alleging that
their use of our machine vision products infringes certain patents issued to Mr.
Lemelson. In addition, we have been notified that other end users of our
AdeptVision VME line and the predecessor line of Multibus machine vision
products have received letters from Mr. Lemelson which refer to Mr. Lemelson's
patent portfolio and offer the end user a license to the particular patents.
Some of these end users have notified us that they may seek indemnification from
us for any damages or expenses resulting from this matter.
While it is not feasible to predict or determine the likelihood or outcome of
any actions against us, we believe the ultimate resolution of these matters
relating to alleged infringement will not have a material adverse effect on our
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
14
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Not Applicable.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Adept's executive officers currently include:
Name Age Position
---- --- --------
Brian R. Carlisle 52 Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief
Executive Officer
Bruce E. Shimano 54 Vice President, Research and Development, Secretary
and Director
Michael W. Overby 46 Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Brian R. Carlisle has served as Adept's Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of
the Board of Directors since he co-founded Adept in June 1983. From June 1980 to
June 1983, he served as General Manager of the West Coast Division of Unimation,
Inc., a manufacturer of industrial robots, where he was responsible for new
product strategy and development for Unimation's electric robots, control
systems, sensing systems and other robotics applications. Mr. Carlisle received
B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Stanford University. Mr.
Carlisle was President of the U.S. Robotic Industries Association for three
years, served as General Chair in May 2000 for the IEEE International Conference
on Robotics and Automation, is currently a member of the Board of Directors for
the National Coalition for Manufacturing Sciences, and serves on the Board of
the National Coalition for Advanced Manufacturing. Mr. Carlisle was elected as
an IEEE Fellow in 2003 for his contributions in robotics.
Bruce E. Shimano has served as our Vice President, Research and Development,
Secretary and a director since he co-founded Adept in June 1983. Prior to that
time, he was Director of Software Development at Unimation. Mr. Shimano received
B.S., M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Stanford University.
Michael W. Overby has served as Adept's Vice President of Finance and Chief
Financial Officer since March 2000. From December 1999 to March 2000, Mr. Overby
held the position of Corporate Controller of Adept. Prior to joining Adept, Mr.
Overby was the financial executive for Digital Generation Systems, Inc., a
provider of digital distribution services to the broadcast advertising industry.
From 1996 to 1998 he was Corporate Controller and Director of Information
Systems at Inprise Corporation, formerly Borland, a publicly-traded software
company. Mr. Overby holds a B.S. in Business Administration from California
Polytechnic State University.
15
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS
Market for Registrant's Common Stock and Related Shareholder Matters
Prior to April 15, 2003, our common stock traded on the Nasdaq National Market
under the symbol "ADTK". During the second and third quarters of fiscal 2003, we
received notifications from the Nasdaq Stock Market indicating that our
securities were subject to delisting from the Nasdaq National Market as a result
of our failure to comply with certain quantitative requirements for continued
listing on the Nasdaq National Market and denying our application to transfer
the listing of our securities to the Nasdaq SmallCap Market. Our appeal of the
delisting decision was denied based upon a Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Panel's
view of our continued inability to meet the requirements for continued listing
on Nasdaq and our stock was delisted effective April 15, 2003. Our common stock
commenced trading on the OTC Bulletin Board on April 15, 2003 under the symbol
"ADTK.OB".
The following table reflects the range of high and low sale prices for each full
quarterly period as reported for trading on the Nasdaq National Market from July
1, 2001 thru April 14, 2003 and on the OTC Bulletin Board from April 15, 2003
through June 30, 2003. The high and low price information from the OTC Bulletin
Board reflects interdealer prices, without retail mark-up, markdown or
commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.
Three Months Ended
Jun. 30, Mar. 29, Dec. 28, Sep. 28, Jun. 30, Mar. 30, Dec. 29, Sep. 29,
2003 2003 2002 2002 2002 2002 2001 2001
------- ------- ------ ------- ------- ------- ------ -------
High $ 0.49 $ 0.70 $ 0.82 $ 2.50 $ 3.64 $ 4.70 $ 5.40 $ 10.60
Low $ 0.14 $ 0.23 $ 0.24 $ 0.35 $ 1.50 $ 2.05 $ 3.05 $ 2.85
At September 19, 2003, there were approximately 421 shareholders of record.
To date, we have neither declared nor paid cash dividends on shares of our
common stock. Shares of our outstanding Preferred Stock are entitled to payment
of dividends prior to payment of any dividends on our common stock as described
under the heading "Liquidity and Capital Resources." We currently intend to
retain all future earnings for our business and do not anticipate paying cash
dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
On August 6, 2003, in connection with the lease restructuring for our Livermore,
California corporate headquarters and facilities, we issued a three year, $3.0
million convertible subordinated note due June 30, 2006 in favor of the
landlord, Tri-Valley Campus LLC, bearing an annual interest rate of 6.0%.
Interest is payable at our option in shares of our common stock. The note is
convertible at any time at the option of the holder into common stock at a
conversion price of $1.00 per share and the resulting shares carry certain
registration and other rights. The issuance of the note was exempt from
registration in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table gives information about our common stock that may be issued
upon exercise of options and rights under all of our existing equity
compensation plans as of June 30, 2003, including Adept's 1993 Stock Plan, 1995
Director Plan, and the 2001 Stock Option Plan and our 1998 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, referred to as the ESPP. Adept's 1993 Stock Plan expired in April
2003. Therefore, no new options will be granted under the 1993 Plan. See Note 9
of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K.
In April 2003, as a result of the delisting and the resulting additional cost
and administrative requirements of maintaining the ESPP, the Board of Directors
suspended future offering periods until a further determination is made to
recommence offering periods under the ESPP in compliance with applicable law. In
16
August 2003, Adept was granted a permit for the sale of securities under the
ESPP plan in California. In September 2003, the Board of Directors reopened
offerings under the ESPP to participation by employees effective for a 12 month
offering subject to compliance with applicable federal and state securities
laws, including the California state permit.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
------------------------------------------------------------------
(a) (b) (c)
Number of securities
Number of remaining available for
securities to be future issuance under
issued upon Weighted-average equity compensation
exercise of exercise price of plans (excluding
Plan Category outstanding outstanding securities reflected in
options and rights options and rights column (a))
Equity compensation plans approved
by security holders (1) 2,796,203 $ 6.11 51,000(3)
Equity compensation plans not
approved by security holders (2) 529,799 3.22 2,070,201
---------- ---------- -----------
Total 3,326,002 $ 5.65 2,121,201
========== ========== ===========
(1) This excludes purchase rights accruing under our 1998 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, for which remaining available rights are included in column (c).
(2) Issued under our 2001 Stock Option Plan, which does not require the approval
of and has not been approved by Adept's shareholders. See Note 9 for a
description of the material terms of the 2001 Stock Option Plan.
(3) This includes 825,671 shares available for issuance under the 1998 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan. The aggregate number of shares of Adept common stock
available for issuance under the 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan is subject to
an annual increase as of the first day of Adept's fiscal year in an amount equal
to the lesser of, (i) 600,000 shares or (ii) 3% of the common stock outstanding
on the last day of the prior fiscal year, or a lesser amount as determined by
Adept's board of directors. At June 30, 2003, 3% of the Company's outstanding
shares was equal to approximately 461,700 shares.
In April 2003, as a result of the delisting of the Company's stock from the
Nasdaq National Market and the resulting additional cost and administrative
requirements of maintaining its 1998 ESPP, the Board of Directors suspended
offering periods until a further determination is made to recommence offering
periods under the ESPP.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the
Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto and "Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included in this
Form 10-K. The historical results are not necessarily indicative of future
results. On July 16, 1999, we completed the acquisition of BYE/Oasis
Engineering, Inc. in a pooling of interests transaction. The selected financial
data prior to June 30, 2000 has been restated to include the historical results
of BYE/Oasis Engineering, Inc. Fiscal 2002 and 2001 results include the
financial results of Pensar-Tucson, NanoMotion Inc., and HexaVision
Technologies, Inc. subsequent to their acquisitions on April 28, 2000, May 31,
2000, and July 21, 2000, respectively. Fiscal 2002 also includes the financial
results for CHAD Industries, Inc., subsequent to its acquisition on October 9,
2001. Fiscal 2003 results include the financial results of Meta Control
Technologies, Inc., subsequent to its acquisition on August 30, 2002.
17
(in thousands, except per share data) Years Ended June 30,
-------------------------------------------------------------
2003 2002 2001 2000 1999
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Results of Operations:
Net revenues ....................................................... $ 44,816 $ 57,039 $ 100,313 $ 99,212 $ 87,374
Cost of revenues ................................................... 34,076 37,868 65,303 56,173 47,902
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Gross margin ................................................. 10,740 19,171 35,010 43,039 39,472
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Operating expenses:
Research, development and engineering ........................ 11,719 20,398 22,727 14,629 11,591
Selling, general and administrative .......................... 22,001 28,994 36,002 29,503 24,676
Restructuring and other non-recurring charges ................ 5,324 17,659 -- -- --
Merger-related charges (1) ................................... -- -- -- 988 --
Amortization of goodwill and other intangibles ............... 728 725 6,818 685 --
Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets ........... -- 6,608 -- -- --
Gain on sale of assets ....................................... -- (1,566) -- -- --
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total operating expenses ........................................... 39,772 72,818 65,547 45,805 36,267
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Operating income (loss) ............................................ (29,032) (53,647) (30,537) (2,766) 3,205
Interest income, net ............................................... 91 438 733 746 926
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Income (loss) before taxes and cumulative
effect of change in accounting principle ........................ (28,941) (53,209) (29,804) (2,020) 4,131
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes .......................... 31 (3,358) 5,396 (593) 1,620
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle ........................................... (28,972) (49,851) (35,200) (1,427) 2,511
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (2) ............ -- (9,973) -- -- --
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) .................................................. $ (28,972) $ (59,824) $ (35,200) $ (1,427) $ 2,511
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Net income (loss) per share:(3)
Before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle:
Basic ......................................................... $ (1.94) $ (3.64) $ (3.02) $ (0.15) $ 0.27
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Diluted ....................................................... $ (1.94) $ (3.64) $ (3.02) $ (0.15) $ 0.26
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
After cumulative effect of change in accounting principle:
Basic ......................................................... $ (1.94) $ (4.37) $ (3.02) $ (0.15) $ 0.27
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Diluted ....................................................... $ (1.94) $ (4.37) $ (3.02) $ (0.15) $ 0.26
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Number of shares used in computing per share amounts:(3)
Basic ......................................................... 14,955 13,691 11,637 9,774 9,302
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Diluted ....................................................... 14,955 13,691 11,637 9,774 9,484
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Balance Sheet Data:
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments .................. $ 3,234 $ 21,681 $ 21,500 $ 20,437 $ 27,016
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Working capital .................................................... 5,193 27,326 39,784 46,593 47,614
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Total assets ....................................................... 35,781 62,494 95,573 93,523 71,677
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Long-term liabilities .............................................. 5,536 2,692 1,284 1,222 --
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Redeemable convertible preferred stock ............................. 25,000 25,000 -- -- --
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Total shareholders' equity (deficit) ............................... (11,583) 15,904 71,482 70,728 55,186
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
(1) In July 1999, we incurred charges of $988,000 relating to the acquisition of
BYE/OASIS.
(2) See "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis" for a description of the
cumulative effect of change in accounting principle.
(3) See Notes 1 and 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a
discussion of the computation of net income (loss) per share.
Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited)
In management's opinion, the unaudited quarterly data has been prepared on the
same basis as the audited information and includes all adjustments (consisting
only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the
data for the periods presented. Adept's results of operations have varied and
may continue to fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter. Results of
operations in any period should not be considered indicative of the results to
be expected from any future period. We operate and report financial results
ending on the last Saturday of a 13-week period for each of our first three
fiscal quarters and at June 30 for our fiscal year end. For convenience, we have
indicated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K our fiscal quarters end on March
31, December 31 and September 30.
18
Fiscal 2003
Three Months Ended,
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in thousands, except percentages and per share data)
Jun. 30, Mar. 31, Dec. 31, Sep. 30,
2003 2003 2002 2002
---- ---- ---- ----
Net revenues ............................... $ 11,316 100.0% $ 12,477 100.0% $ 10,748 100.0% $ 10,275 100.0%
Cost of revenues ........................... 9,047 80.0 9,000 72.1 7,773 72.3 8,256 80.3
-------- ----- -------- ----- -------- ----- -------- -----
Gross margin ............................... 2,269 20.0 3,477 27.9 2,975 27.7 2,019 19.7
-------- ----- -------- ----- -------- ----- -------- -----
Operating expenses:
Research, development and engineering ... 2,210 19.5 2,916 23.4 3,071 28.5 3,522 34.3
Selling, general and administrative ..... 3,986 35.2 5,092 40.8 6,477 60.3 6,445 62.7
Restructuring expenses .................. 2,168 19.2 2,020 16.2 -- -- 1,136 11.1
Amortization of intangibles ................ 195 1.7 185 1.5 199 1.9 150 1.4
Amortization of intangibles ................ 195 1.7 185 1.5 199 1.9 150 1.4
-------- ----- -------- ----- -------- ----- -------- -----
Total operating expenses ................... 8,559 75.6 10,213 81.9 9,747 90.7 11,253 109.5
-------- ----- -------- ----- -------- ----- -------- -----
Operating loss ............................. (6,290) (55.6) (6,736) (54.0) (6,772) (63.0) (9,234) (89.8)
Interest income, net ....................... (102) (0.9) (16) (0.1) 30 0.3 179 1.7
-------- ----- -------- ----- -------- ----- -------- -----
Loss before income taxes ................... (6,392) (56.5) (6,752) (54.1) (6,742) (62.7) (9,055) (88.1)
Provision for (benefit from) income
Taxes .................................... -- -- -- -- -- -- 31 0.3
-------- ----- -------- ----- -------- ----- -------- -----
Net loss ................................... $ (6,392) (56.5)% $ (6,752) (54.1)% $ (6,742) (62.7)% $ (9,086) (88.4)%
======== ===== ======== ===== ======== ===== ======== =====
Basic and diluted net loss per share ....... $ (0.42) $ (0.44) $ (0.45) $ (0.63)
======== ======== ======== ========
Basic and diluted number of shares
used in computing per share amounts ...... 15,304 15,225 15,074 14,327
======== ======== ======== ========
Fiscal 2002
Three Months Ended,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in thousands, except percentages and per share data)
Jun. 30, Mar. 31, Dec. 31, Sep. 30,
2002 2002 2001 2001
---- ---- ---- ----
Net revenues ............................... $ 14,635 100.0% $ 14,588 100.0% $ 14,431 100.0% $ 13,385 100.0%
Cost of revenues ........................... 10,103 69.0 9,856 67.6 9,172 63.6 8,737 65.3
-------- ----- -------- ----- -------- ----- -------- -----
Gross margin ............................... 4,532 31.0 4,732 32.4 5,259 36.4 4,648 34.7
-------- ----- -------- ----- -------- ----- -------- -----
Operating expenses:
Research, development and engineering ... 4,967 33.9 5,008 34.3 4,585 31.8 5,838 43.6
Selling, general and administrative ..... 6,971 47.6 7,192 49.3 7,117 49.3 7,714 57.6
Restructuring expenses .................. -- -- 5,323 36.5 -- -- 12,336 92.2
Amortization of goodwill and other
intangibles .......................... 149 1.0 216 1.5 180 1.2 180 1.3
Impairment of goodwill .................. 6,608 45.2 -- -- -- -- -- --
(Gain) loss on sale of assets ........... (1,566) (10.6) -- -- -- -- -- --
-------- ----- -------- ----- -------- ----- -------- -----
Total operating expenses ................... 17,129 117.1 17,739 121.6 11,882 82.3 26,068 194.7
-------- ----- -------- ----- -------- ----- -------- -----
Operating loss ............................. (12,597) (86.1) (13,007) (89.2) (6,623) (45.9) (21,420) (160.0)
Interest income, net ....................... 95 0.6 123 0.9 137 1.0 83 0.6
-------- ----- -------- ----- -------- ----- -------- -----
Loss before income taxes and cumulative
effect of change in accounting principle (12,502) (85.5) (12,884) (88.3) (6,486) (44.9) (21,337) (159.4)
Provision for (benefit from) income
Taxes .................................... (570) (3.9) 2,935 (20.1) 66 0.5 81 0.6
-------- ----- -------- ----- -------- ----- -------- -----
Net loss before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle .......... $(11,932) (81.6) $ (9,949) (68.2) $ (6,552) (45.4) $(21,418) (160.0)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
Principle ............................... $ -- -- $ -- -- $ -- -- $ (9,973) (74.5)
-------- ----- -------- ----- -------- ----- -------- -----
Net loss ................................... $(11,932) (81.6)% $ (9,949) (68.2)% $ (6,552) (45.4)% $(31,391) (234.5)%
======== ===== ======== ===== ======== ===== ======== =====
Basic and diluted net loss per share:
Before cumulative effect of change
in accounting principle .............. $ (0.85) $ (0.72) $ (0.48) $ (1.63)
======== ======== ======== ========
After cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle .................. $ (0.85) $ (0.72) $ (0.48) $ (2.38)
======== ======== ======== ========
Basic and diluted number of shares
used in computing per share amounts ...... 13,976 13,829 13,567 13,169
======== ======== ======== ========
19
The cumulative effect of change in accounting principle of $10.0 million was
originally reported in our results of operations in the Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended March 30, 2002, when the amount of the impairment under SFAS 142
was determined. However, because the impairment relates to the effective date of
SFAS 142, or July 1, 2001 for Adept, the cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle is properly reflected in the fiscal quarter ended September
30, 2001 in the table above.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Overview
We provide intelligent production automation solutions, components and services
to our customers in many industries including the food,
electronics/communications, automotive, appliance, semiconductor, original
equipment manufacturer, or OEM, and life sciences industries. During the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2003, product revenue mix was comprised of the following:
23% in electronics/communications, 21% in food and pharmaceuticals, 16% in
semiconductor, 14% in appliance, 12% in automotive, 7% in OEM, 4% in life
sciences, and 3% in all others. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002,
product revenue mix was comprised of the following: 26% in food and
pharmaceuticals, 21% in electronics/communications, 14% in automotive, 13% in
appliance, 9% in semiconductor, 8% in OEM and 9% in all others. This mix varies
considerably from period to period due to a variety of market and economic
factors. We utilize our comprehensive product portfolio of high precision
mechanical components and application development software to deliver automation
solutions that meet our customer's increasingly complex manufacturing
requirements. We offer our customers a comprehensive and tailored automation
solution that we call Rapid Deployment Automation that reduces the time and cost
to design, engineer and launch products into high-volume production. Our
products currently include system design software, process knowledge software,
real-time vision and motion controls, machine vision systems, robot mechanisms,
precision solutions and other flexible automation equipment. In recent years, we
have expanded our robot product lines and developed advanced software and
sensing technologies that have enabled robots to perform a wider range of
functions. In fiscal 2003, we introduced Amps in Base (AIB) Cobra robots, our
highest volume Scara robots which are expected to have a significant positive
impact on our gross margins during fiscal 2004 and beyond. The introduction and
marketing of these next generation Scara robots are expected to have the biggest
positive impact on our Components and Solutions segments.
International sales comprise between 30% and 60% of our total revenues for any
given quarter.
We have significant lease obligations for our California facilities. We are
currently litigating with the landlord of our San Jose facility regarding our
lease obligations for that facility. We have vacated and no longer pay rent on
this facility. We have recorded expenses in the amount of $2.3 million for the
remaining unpaid rent associated with this lease; however, we have not reserved
the cash associated with such unpaid rent expenses. Our cash usage for the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 and our expectations for cash usage for the first
two quarters of fiscal 2004 are significantly impacted by our nonpayment of rent
for this facility. If we receive a material adverse judgment in the San Jose
lease litigation and do not have control of the timing of the payments of any
such judgment, we may not have sufficient cash to meet our obligations and
therefore, we may be required to cease operations.
On August 6, 2003, we completed a lease restructuring with Tri-Valley Campus
LLC, the landlord for our Livermore, California corporate headquarters and
facilities, which is expected to reduce our quarterly lease expenses by
approximately 78%. Under the lease amendment, we were released of our lease
obligations for two unoccupied buildings in Livermore and received a rent
reduction on the occupied building from $1.55 to $1.10 per square foot. In
addition, the lease amendment carries liquidated damages in the event of default
on the lease payments equivalent to 1 year of rent obligations on the original
lease. In the event of Adept's bankruptcy or a failure to make payments to the
landlord of our Livermore, California facilities within three days after a
written notice from the landlord, a default would be triggered on the lease. In
connection with the lease restructuring, we issued a three year, $3.0 million
convertible subordinated note due June 30, 2006 in favor of the landlord bearing
an annual interest rate of 6.0%. Interest is payable at our option in shares of
our common stock. The note is convertible at any time at the option of the
holder in into our common stock at a conversion price of $1.00 per share and the
resulting shares carry certain registration and other rights. This liability was
recorded as long term Subordinated Convertible Note in the accompanying balance
sheet with a corresponding reduction in accrued unpaid rent on Livermore
facilities and an additional restructuring charge for the excess of the note
amount over accrued unpaid rent on Livermore facilities. Payment under the note
20
will be accelerated in the event of a default, including the insolvency or
bankruptcy of Adept, Adept's failure to pay its obligations under the note when
due, Adept's default on certain material agreements, including the Livermore
lease, the occurrence of a material adverse change with respect to Adept's
business or ability to pay its obligations under the note, or a change of
control of Adept without the landlord's consent.
Our common stock was delisted from Nasdaq effective April 15, 2003 as a result
of our failure to comply with certain quantitative listing requirements. Our
common stock commenced trading on the OTC Bulletin Board on April 15, 2003.
In April 2003, we implemented plans to reduce our headcount by an additional 7%
of our total employees, which we expect to result in approximately $0.5 million
per quarter in cash savings as compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2003, when
fully implemented in the second quarter of fiscal 2004.
We have experienced declining revenues and incurred operating losses in each of
the last three fiscal years. During this period, we have also consumed
significant cash and other financial resources, and presently have minimal
liquidity. In response to these conditions, we reduced operating costs and
employee headcount, and restructured certain operating lease commitments in
fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2003. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, we
reduced our headcount by an additional 7% of our total employees, which we
expect to fully implement by the second quarter of fiscal 2004. These
adjustments to our operations have also significantly reduced our cash
consumption and the aggregate revenue levels necessary to achieve break-even
operating results. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis - Liquidity." In
addition, we intend to seek an expansion of our existing working capital
receivables financing facility, or secure an alternative credit facility to
improve our near term liquidity. Furthermore, we continue to pursue outside debt
and equity sources of financing that can provide Adept with a longer-term source
of capital and generally improve our balance sheet and financial stability.
Even if we do not receive a material adverse judgment in the litigation relating
to our San Jose lease, if the results of our search for additional outside
sources of financing are unsuccessful, or if adequate funds are not available on
acceptable terms or at all and we are unable to achieve our projected revenues
or if operating expenses exceed current estimates, we will be forced to curtail
our operations and we may not be able to take advantage of market opportunities,
develop or enhance new products, pursue acquisitions that would complement our
existing product offerings or enhance our technical capabilities, execute our
business plan or otherwise respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated
requirements. Even if we complete a financing, the transaction is likely to
involve the incurrence of debt or issuance of debt or equity securities of
Adept, which would dilute the outstanding equity.
The consolidated financial statements accompanying this Annual Report on Form
10-K have been prepared assuming that Adept will continue as a going concern.
However, the accompanying Independent Auditors' Report states that we have
incurred recurring operating losses, have a net capital deficiency and have
experienced a declining cash balance which have adversely affected our liquidity
and that these conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue
as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments to
reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of
assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the
outcome of this uncertainty.
This discussion summarizes the significant factors affecting our consolidated
operating results, financial condition, liquidity and cash flow during the
three-year period ended June 30, 2003, each year therein referred to as fiscal
2003, 2002, and 2001. Unless otherwise indicated, references to any year in this
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operation refer to our fiscal year ended June 30. This discussion should be read
with the consolidated financial statements and financial statement footnotes
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Critical Accounting Policies
Management's discussion and analysis of Adept's financial condition and results
of operations are based upon Adept's consolidated financial statements which
have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires
management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect reported
21
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, we
evaluate our estimates, including those related to fixed price contracts,
product returns, warranty obligations, bad debt, inventories, cancellation costs
associated with long-term commitments, investments, intangible assets, income
taxes, restructuring, service contracts, contingencies and litigation. We base
our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are
believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the
basis for making estimates and judgments about the carrying value of assets and
liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Estimates, by
their nature, are based on judgment and available information. Therefore, actual
results could differ from those estimates and could have a material impact on
our consolidated financial statements, and it is possible that such changes
could occur in the near term.
We have identified the accounting principles which we believe are most critical
to our reported financial status by considering accounting policies that involve
the most complex or subjective decisions or assessments. These accounting
policies described below include:
o revenue recognition;
o allowance for doubtful accounts;
o inventories;
o warranty reserve;
o goodwill and other intangible assets;
o identified intangible assets; and
o deferred tax valuation allowance.
For further discussion of our significant accounting policies, refer to Note 1,
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.
Revenue Recognition. We recognize product revenue, in accordance with SAB 101,
when persuasive evidence of a non-cancelable arrangement exists, delivery has
occurred and/or services have been rendered, the price is fixed or determinable,
collectibility is reasonably assured, legal title and economic risk is
transferred to the customer, and when an economic exchange has taken place. If a
significant portion of the price is due after our normal payment terms, which
are 30 to 90 days from the invoice date, we account for the price as not being
fixed and determinable. In these cases, if all of the other conditions referred
to above are met, we recognize the revenue as the invoice becomes due. In Japan,
we sell our products through a reseller, and we have separate agreements with
this reseller for each of our product lines that it sells. For all RDA Real-Time
Control and RDA Mechanical Components with this reseller, we have a pass-through
arrangement, such that under this arrangement, we defer 100% of the revenue upon
shipment and the reseller is not obligated to remit payment to us until they
receive payment from the end user. When all other aspects of SAB 101 have been
satisfied, we recognize revenue upon payment from the end user. For all other
product lines, no pass through arrangement exists. For these products we follow
our normal revenue recognition policies.
We recognize software revenue, primarily related to our simulation software
products, in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants' Statement of Position 97-2 ("SOP 97-2") on Software Revenue
Recognition. License revenue is recognized on shipment of the product provided
that no significant vendor or post-contract support obligations remain and that
collection of the resulting receivable is deemed probable by management.
Insignificant vendor and post-contract support obligations are accrued upon
shipment of the licensed product. For software that is installed and integrated
by the customer, revenue is recognized upon shipment assuming functionality has
already been proven in prior sales and there are no customizations that would
cause a substantial acceptance risk. For software that is installed and
integrated by Adept, revenue is recognized upon customer signoff of a Final
Product Acceptance (FPA) form.
Service revenue includes training, consulting and customer support. Revenues
from training and consulting are recognized at the time the service is performed
and the customer has accepted the work.
Deferred revenue primarily relates to items deferred under SAB 101.
22
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts
for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make
required payments. We assess the customer's ability to pay based on a number of
factors, including our past transaction history with the customer and credit
worthiness of the customer. Management specifically analyzes accounts receivable
and historical bad debts, customer concentrations, customer credit-worthiness,
current economic trends and changes in our customer payment terms when
evaluating the adequacy of the allowances for doubtful accounts. We do not
generally request collateral from our customers. If the financial condition of
our customers were to deteriorate in the future, resulting in an impairment of
their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.
Specifically our policy is to record specific reserves against known doubtful
accounts. Additionally, a general reserve is calculated based on the greater of
0.5% of consolidated accounts receivable or 20% of consolidated accounts
receivable more than 120 days past due. Specific reserves are netted out of the
respective receivable balances for purposes of calculating the general reserve.
On an ongoing basis, we evaluate the credit worthiness of our customers and
should the default rate change or the financial positions of our customers
change, we may increase the general reserve percentage.
Inventories. Inventories are stated at the lower of standard cost, which
approximates actual cost (first-in, first-out method) or market (estimated net
realizable value). We perform a detailed assessment of inventory at each balance
sheet date, which includes, among other factors, a review of component demand
requirements, product lifecycle and product development plans, and quality
issues. As a result of this assessment, we write down inventory for estimated
obsolescence or unmarketable inventory equal to the difference between the cost
of the inventory and the estimated market value based upon assumptions about
future demand and market conditions. If actual demand and market conditions are
less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory
write-downs may be required.
Manufacturing inventory includes raw materials, work-in-process, and finished
goods. All work-in-process inventories with work orders that are open in excess
of 180 days are fully written down. The remaining inventory valuation provisions
are based on an excess and obsolete systems report, which captures all obsolete
parts and products and all other inventory, which have quantities on hand in
excess of one year's projected demand. Individual line item exceptions are
identified for either inclusion or exclusion from the inventory valuation
provision. The materials control group and cost accounting function monitor the
line item exceptions and make periodic adjustments as necessary.
Warranty Reserve. We provide for the estimated cost of product warranties at the
time revenue is recognized. While we engage in extensive product quality
programs and processes, including activity monitoring and evaluating the quality
of our components suppliers, our warranty obligation is affected by product
failure rates, material usage and service labor and delivery costs incurred in
correcting a product failure. Should actual product failure rates, material
usage, service labor or delivery costs differ from our estimates, revisions to
the estimated warranty liability would be required.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The purchase method of accounting for
acquisitions requires extensive use of accounting estimates and judgments to
allocate the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable
net assets of acquired companies allocated to goodwill. Other intangible assets
primarily represent developed technology and non-compete covenants.
Adept accounts for goodwill under SFAS 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets," which requires us to review for impairment of goodwill on an annual
basis, and between annual tests whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. This impairment review
involves a two-step process.
Step 1- Compare the fair value of the reporting units to their carrying
amounts. If a unit's fair value exceeds its carrying amount, no further
work is performed and no impairment charge is necessary. For each
reporting unit where the carrying amount exceeds fair value, step 2 is
performed.
Step 2- Compare the implied fair value of the reporting unit to its
carrying amount. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit's goodwill
exceeds its implied fair value, an impairment loss will be recognized in
an amount equal to that excess.
23
We performed our goodwill impairment tests upon adoption of SFAS 142 and again
during the fourth quarters of fiscal 2002 and 2003. In the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2002, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $6.6 million as a
result of the annual impairment update. Results of the fiscal 2003 annual
impairment testing did not indicate an impairment of our then existing goodwill,
and therefore we were not required to record a goodwill impairment charge in
fiscal 2003. Upon adoption of SFAS 142 on July 1, 2001, we ceased amortization
of our existing net goodwill balance.
Identified Intangible Assets. Acquisition-related intangibles include developed
technology and non-compete agreements and are amortized on a straight-line basis
over periods ranging from 2-4 years. Identified intangible assets are regularly
reviewed to determine whether facts and circumstances exist which indicate that
the useful life is shorter than originally estimated or the carrying amount of
assets may not be recoverable. The company assesses the recoverability of
identified intangible assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash
flows associated with the related asset or group of assets over their remaining
lives against their respective carrying amounts. Impairment, if any, is based on
the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets.
Deferred Tax Valuation Allowance. We record a valuation allowance to reduce
deferred tax assets to the amount that is most likely to be realized. While we
have considered future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax
planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance, in the
event we were to determine that we would be able to realize deferred tax assets
in the future in excess of our net recorded amount, an adjustment to the
deferred tax asset would increase the income in the period such determination
was made. Likewise, should we have a net deferred tax asset and determine that
we would not be able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax asset in the
future, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would be charged to income in
the period that such determination was made.
Acquisitions
During the three-year period ended June 30, 2003, we acquired three companies:
Meta Control Technologies, Inc., CHAD Industries, Inc., and HexaVision
Technologies, Inc. These acquisitions are described below.
Meta Control Technologies
On August 30, 2002, we completed the acquisition of a controlling interest in
Meta Control Technologies, Inc., or Meta, a Delaware corporation. Meta develops,
designs, manufactures and markets products that automate a wide range of
manufacturing processes requiring precise motion, accurate machine vision and
rapid process instrumentation. Some of the applications that make use of our
technology include semiconductor and electronics assembly, micro-mechanical and
fiber optic assembly, laboratory automation and discrete process automation. The
acquisition of Meta extends our controls architecture to include two axis, low
power controls in small packages allowing remote placement of motion and sensor
controls that directly plug into our new architecture using IEEE 1394 Firewire
technology. In addition, Meta has a line of programmable cameras that when
combined with the low power controller and our HexSight software can be packaged
as a very low cost, competitive OEM product. The results of Meta's operations
have been included in our consolidated financial statements since August 30,
2002.
Upon the closing of the acquisition transaction with Meta, we acquired a 67%
ownership interest in Meta, with the remaining 33% ownership interest in Meta
being held by one shareholder. The acquisition agreement provides that Adept
will acquire all of these remaining shares in return for the provision of
discounts and royalty payments to the shareholder and its affiliates as
described in the paragraph below but will, in any event and regardless of
whether discounts are incurred or royalties paid, acquire 100% of the stock of
Meta no later than August 2008 for no additional consideration.
Under the terms of the acquisition agreement, we issued 730,000 shares of our
common stock to the shareholders of Meta with a value of $825,000. The value of
the 730,000 shares was determined based on the average closing price of Adept's
stock for the period of three trading days ended September 3, 2002. Ten percent
of the 730,000 shares of common stock were placed into escrow for one year from
the completion of the acquisition pending certain contingencies under the terms
of the acquisition agreement. All of the escrowed shares have been released to
the former Meta shareholders. Additionally, Adept agreed to provide up to $1.7
million of discounts and royalties through August 2008 to a shareholder of Meta
based upon future sales to that shareholder or certain of its affiliates. Such
24
amounts will be charged to operations when incurred. As of June 30, 2003, we
have not incurred any expenses related to the discounts and royalties. In
connection with the acquisition, we assumed a $500,000 line of credit with
Meta's lender, Paragon Commercial Bank bearing interest at 1% plus the prime
rate announced from time to time by the Wall Street Journal. In March 2003, we
terminated the $500,000 line of credit with Paragon Commercial Bank and paid the
outstanding balance with the funds used to secure the line of credit to reduce
interest expense associated with the line of credit. Additionally, we entered
into a loan agreement for up to $800,000 with a former shareholder of Meta and
issued into escrow for the benefit of the lender 100,000 shares of the Company's
common stock valued at $113,000, subject to certain cancellation rights. In
March 2003, Adept and the former shareholder terminated the $800,000 loan
agreement, and we cancelled the 100,000 shares. No amounts were ever borrowed
under the agreement.
CHAD Industries
On October 9, 2001, Adept completed the acquisition of all the outstanding
shares of CHAD Industries, Inc. (CHAD), now named Adept Orange Corporation, a
design and manufacturing company specializing in precision assembly automation
based in Orange, California. The acquisition of CHAD was a strategic step in
Adept's ongoing precision assembly automation strategy. Adept leverages CHAD's
expertise in small part feeding, precision tooling design, handling of odd-form
components to add capacity in precision assembly automation. Additionally, we
support CHAD's line of odd-form component assembly machines. The results of
CHAD's operations have been included in Adept's consolidated financial
statements since October 9, 2001.
Under terms of the acquisition agreement, the purchase price of $10.1 million
includes an aggregate of $8.4 million in cash, $150,000 in transaction costs and
200,000 shares of Adept common stock valued at $1.6 million. The value of the
200,000 shares issued was determined based on the average closing price of
Adept's stock over the period of five trading days prior to June 27, 2001, the
date of entry into the definitive agreement. Of the $8.4 million in cash, $4.2
million was paid as of the closing date on October 9, 2001 $2.6 million was paid
on October 9, 2002 and on December 13, 2002, CHAD and Adept amended the $1.6
million second anniversary promissory note and the funds then held in escrow in
the amount of the note were released to Adept. The second anniversary promissory
note was paid in full in February 2003. In addition, the acquisition agreement
provided for Adept to make cash payments of $242,000 and potential stock
issuances consisting of 61,000 shares equal to approximately $467,000 over a
period of three years after the closing date to certain specified employees of
CHAD, contingent on the continued employment of such employees. As such, those
amounts have been appropriately excluded from the purchase price and are being
expensed as paid. As of June 30, 2003, 57,000 shares were issued and $167,000 in
cash was paid to certain specified employees of CHAD. At June 30, 2003, $65,000
in contingent cash and no contingent shares remain to be paid by October 9, 2004
contingent on the continued employment of certain specified employees. This
acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting.
HexaVision
On July 21, 2000, we completed the acquisition of HexaVision Technologies Inc.,
now named Adept Technology Canada Co., a Canadian corporation. HexaVision was a
machine vision research and development company. HexaVision's core technology
incorporates techniques to achieve accuracies up to 1/40th of a pixel with
machine vision measurement algorithms that can increase our performance in
critical and demanding applications such as vision servoing for the
microelectrical, fiber optic, semiconductor, metrology and precision assembly
applications. In connection with the acquisition, we paid $5.5 million in cash,
which included transaction costs of $0.4 million, and issued shares of our
common stock to the shareholders of HexaVision with a value of $1.1 million. We
have accounted for the acquisition under the purchase method of accounting. On
July 21, 2001, pursuant to the terms of the share purchase agreement relating to
the acquisition of HexaVision, we made the first anniversary cash payment and
share issuance consisting of 116,000 shares of our common stock with a value of
$1.1 million and released $313,000 in cash from an escrow account to the
employees and former shareholders of HexaVision. On July 21, 2002, we made the
second anniversary cash payment of $53,000 and released $1.4 million in cash
from an escrow account to the employees and former shareholders of HexaVision.
The contingency payments made and shares issued to the employees of HexaVision
were appropriately recorded as operating expenses. The contingent payments made
and shares issued to the former shareholders of HexaVision were allocated to
goodwill and accounted for as additional purchase price.
25
For further discussion of these acquisitions, see Note 2 to our Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Results of Operations
Comparison of Fiscal 2003 to 2002
Net Revenues. Our net revenues decreased by 21.4% to $44.8 million in 2003 from
$57.0 million in 2002. The decrease in net revenues is primarily attributable to
reduced unit shipments and reduced average selling prices in most of our product
families. We believe this decline is consistent with a decline in overall market
conditions driven by excess manufacturing capacity and a response on the part of
our customers to reduce capital spending and operating expenses in an effort to
deal with their excess manufacturing capacity. Revenues decreased in our
Components and Solutions segments while revenues increased in our Services and
Support segment. Components revenues decreased 32.5% to $25.0 million for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 from $37.1 million for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2002. The decline is attributable to continued softness across all
industries served by our Components segment. Additionally, the decrease is
attributable to the decline in software revenues as a result of our sale of the
SILMA Inspection business. Solutions revenues decreased 10.8% to $6.6 million
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 from $7.4 million for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2002. The decrease reflects softness in the semiconductor market
offset by increased demand in the data storage market. Services and Support
revenues increased 5.1% to $13.2 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003
from $12.6 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002. The increase is
primarily attributable to services involved in the redeployment of existing
equipment as well as customers choosing to extend the useful life of existing
equipment rather than commit capital expenditures to purchase new equipment.
Our domestic sales were $27.8 million in fiscal 2002 compared to $25.2 million
in fiscal 2002, an increase of 10.0%. Our international sales were $17.1 million
in fiscal 2002 compared to $31.8 million in fiscal 2002, a decrease of 46.1%.
The decrease in international sales is mainly attributable to a decrease in our
international Components revenue segment.
Gross Margin. Gross margin as a percentage of net revenue was 24.0% in 2003
compared to 33.6% in 2002. We experienced a downward trend over each quarter of
fiscal 2003 associated with an approximately 50% decrease in manufacturing
volume. Much of our labor and overhead expense is relatively fixed, and
significant declines in production volumes associated with the depressed demand
environment combined with only modest reductions in manufacturing overhead
expenditures resulted in higher unit costs and lower corresponding gross
margins. We have taken steps to reduce our overhead while preserving critical
new product introduction capabilities and sufficient capacity to react to an
increase in demand. Additionally, we experienced some additional costs normally
associated with the introduction of our new products. We have introduced and
continue to introduce these new products despite the weak current demand levels
because they bring additional functionality for our customers as well as provide
cost improvements for us. We also recorded provisions for excess inventory
during the fiscal year as reduced demand forecasts revealed additional excess
inventory components. We expect gross margins to improve in fiscal 2004 due to
the reduction in fixed overhead costs and the introduction of higher margin
products, however, we expect to continue to experience weak demand in several of
the industries we serve and fluctuations in our gross margin percentage due to
changes in volume, changes in availability of components, changes in product
configuration and changes in sales mix. Our gross margins for fiscal 2003
reflect salary reductions for domestic employees above certain pay ranges, and
pay holidays for domestic employees for all four quarters of Fiscal 2003. These
measures resulted in savings of approximately $466,000.
Research, Development and Engineering Expenses. Research, development and
engineering expenses decreased by 42.5% to $11.7 million, or 26.1% of net
revenues in 2003, from $20.4 million, or 35.8% of net revenues in 2002. The
decrease primarily reflects headcount reductions and lower project expenses due
to extensive restructuring activities undertaken in fiscal 2002 and 2003. Salary
related expenses were reduced by approximately $4.3 million for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2003 as compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002. Expenses
in 2002 also included two of five required quarterly expenditures totaling $2.0
million, which were part of commitments under a joint development and supply
agreement with JDS Uniphase Corporation. No expenses were incurred under the
agreement in fiscal 2003, which was terminated in the second quarter of 2003.
Despite the reduction in expenses during the year, Adept was able to maintain
research, development and engineering efforts required to complete several key
initiatives in product development. These projects were deemed crucial to
leveraging our position in the market, reducing our product material costs, and
maintaining our technological advantage relative to our competition. Our
26
research, development and engineering expenses for Fiscal 2003 reflect salary
reductions for domestic employees above certain pay ranges, and pay holidays for
domestic employees for all four quarters of Fiscal 2003. These measures resulted
in savings of approximately $862,000
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and
administrative expenses decreased 24.1% to $22.0 million or 49.1% of net
revenues in 2003 from $29.0 million or 50.8% of net revenues in 2002. The
decrease in expense for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 as compared to the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2002 was primarily attributable to restructuring
activities in fiscal 2002 and 2003, which resulted in significant headcount
reductions. Salary and related expenses were reduced by approximately $4.4
million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 compared to the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2002 as a result of these headcount reductions. These decreases
were partially offset by a $0.7 million increase associated with an additional
lease commitment that we were obligated to assume in the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2002. Our selling, general and administrative expenses for Fiscal 2003
reflect salary reductions for domestic employees above certain pay ranges, and
pay holidays for domestic employees for all four quarters of Fiscal 2003. These
measures resulted in savings of approximately $1,271,000
Fiscal 2003
----------------------------------------------------
(In thousands)
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Cost Savings $ 835 $ 748 $ 1,275 $ 1,441
Restructuring Charges. We recorded $5.3 million in restructuring charges for
fiscal 2003. The charges consist of $1.9 million for workforce reduction and
severance costs, $3.1 million in lease commitments for idle facilities and $0.3
million for leasehold improvement and other fixed assets associated with
restructured facilities. Workforce reduction-related costs of $1.9 million
represent a reduction of approximately 84 employees in most functional areas
across all three of our reportable business segments and at June 30, 2003, all
of the affected employees had ceased employment with Adept. Lease commitments
for idle facilities of $3.1 million result from the further consolidation of
facilities and are primarily attributable to the exit from our San Jose facility
and the restructure of lease commitments associated with excess capacity at our
Livermore facility. Restructuring charges were $5.3 million for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2003 compared to restructuring charges of $17.7 million for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2002. The restructuring charges of $17.7 million for
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002 relate to the exiting of certain
non-strategic product lines and the consolidation of certain manufacturing and
support facilities, including related headcount reductions.
Fiscal Year ended, Fiscal Year ended,
(in thousands) June 30, 2003 June 30, 2002
------------- -------------
Employee severance costs.......... $ 1,872 $ 1,692
Lease termination costs........... 3,134 6,800
Asset impairment charges.......... 318 9,167
-------------- -------------
Total........................... $ 5,324 $ 17,659
============== =============
We anticipate that when the fiscal 2003 restructuring activities take full
effect, the Components segment will experience an annualized reduction in
expenses of approximately $4.8 million in fiscal 2004 as compared to fiscal 2002
with no offsetting decline in revenues. We anticipate that the Solutions segment
will experience an annualized reduction in expenses of approximately $0.5
million as compared to fiscal 2002 with no offsetting decline in revenues. The
Services and Support segment is expected to experience an annualized reduction
in expenses of approximately $0.9 million as compared to fiscal 2002 with no
offsetting decline in revenues. Our assumptions that revenues will not be
impacted are based only on an analysis of the remaining capacity available in
manufacturing, sales and service to support such revenue levels; however,
revenue levels could change for other reasons, such as reduced demand for our
products. These restructuring activities are expected to result in lower
operating expenses in future periods.
Other Intangible Assets Amortization. Other intangibles amortization was $0.7
million for both fiscal 2003 and 2002. Goodwill is no longer subject to
amortization, but instead is now subject to impairment testing at least on an
annual basis, as discussed in Note 4 of our Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
27
Impairment of goodwill. SFAS 142 requires at least annual impairment testing of
our goodwill. The results of our April 2003 annual impairment testing did not
indicate an impairment of our then existing goodwill, and therefore we were not
required to record a goodwill impairment charge in fiscal 2003. In fiscal 2002,
we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $6.6 million as a result of our
April 2002 annual impairment update. See Note 4 of our Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further
discussion.
Gain on Sale of Assets. Net gain on sale of assets was $0 in fiscal 2003 and
$1.6 million in fiscal 2002. In the fourth quarter of 2002, we completed the
sale of certain non-strategic assets of our SILMA business, referred to as the
CimStation Inspection product line. The assets were sold for a purchase price of
$2.0 million of which $1.75 million was paid in cash and the remaining $250,000
was deposited in escrow contingent upon meeting certain CimStation revenue
projections for the period July 1, 2001 through June 30, 2002. Actual revenue
for the period fell short of projections and we released the remaining $250,000
to the buyer of the SILMA business in October 2002 in accordance with the terms
of the agreement. In addition, we incurred $21,000 in transaction costs related
to the sale of the CimStation Inspection assets resulting in net proceeds of
$1.73 million. The gain on sale of the Cimstation Inspection assets was
partially offset by a loss on sale of other assets of $0.18 million.
Interest Income, Net. Interest income, net, was $91,000 in fiscal 2003 compared
to $438,000 in fiscal 2002. The decrease was due in part to a combination of
lower interest rates and a lower average cash balance attributable to our
decreased revenues. Additionally, interest expense increased in 2003 due to
charges incurred on advances received under the Silicon Valley Bank accounts
receivable purchase facility and interest accrued on the JDSU promissory note.
We expect interest expense to continue to increase as a result of the
convertible note issued in connection with the lease restructuring.
Provision for (Benefit From) Income Taxes. Our effective tax rate was less than
1% for 2003 as compared to (6%) for 2002. Our tax rate for 2003 differs from the
federal statutory income tax rate of 34% because we experienced a pretax net
loss, and under rules applicable to accounting for operating loss carry
forwards, no benefit may be taken where the utilization of such benefit is
dependent on the generation of future taxable income. In 2002, our tax rate
differed from the federal statutory rate of 34% primarily due to a $3.6 million
tax refund resulting from the carry back of our net operating loss from the year
ended June 30, 2001. This refund opportunity arose as a result of a change in
applicable law enacted on March 9, 2002, which extended the carry back period
from three to five tax years.
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle. On July 1, 2001, we
implemented SFAS 142 which requires goodwill and intangible assets to be
evaluated for impairment at least annually for fiscals years beginning in 2001.
We completed the measurement of the impairment loss in the third quarter of
fiscal 2002, and recorded an aggregate charge of $16.6 million for such
impairment. Of this amount, $10.0 million was deemed attributable to periods
prior to fiscal 2002, and accordingly was recorded as a cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle.
Derivative Financial Instruments. Our foreign currency hedging program is used
to hedge our exposure to foreign currency exchange risk on local international
operational assets and liabilities. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on
forward currency contracts that were effective as hedges of assets and
liabilities were recognized in income as a component of selling, general and
administrative expenses. We recognized forward currency contract losses of
$271,000 for the year ended June 30, 2003 and $728,000 for the year ended June
30, 2002. In March 2003, we determined that our international activities held or
conducted in foreign currency did not warrant the cost associated with a hedging
program due to our decreased aggregate net exposure of foreign currency exchange
risk on international operational assets and liabilities. As a result, we
suspended our foreign currency hedging program in March 2003.
Comparison of Fiscal 2002 to 2001
Net Revenues. Our net revenues decreased by 43.2% to $57.0 million in fiscal
2002 from $100.3 million in fiscal 2001. The significant decrease in revenues
primarily resulted from reduced demand for, and associated reduced unit
shipments of most of our product family. We believe that this reduction in
demand was reflected in the broader marketplace as our customers significantly
28
reduced their capital expenditures in an effort to deal with excess
manufacturing capacity. Following the significant drop in our revenues in the
first quarter of Fiscal 2002, customers continued to experience uncertainty and
cancelled some orders and postponed placing other orders, which resulted in a
further decline in our revenues in subsequent quarters.
Our domestic sales were $25.2 million in fiscal 2002 compared to $63.9 million
in fiscal 2001, a decrease of 60.5%. Our international sales were $31.8 million
in fiscal 2002 compared to $36.4 million in fiscal 2001, a decrease of 12.6%.
Both our domestic and international markets were significantly impacted by the
uncertain and weak global economic conditions, which caused a dramatic decrease
in capital spending by our customers, especially in the United States.
Gross Margin. Gross margin as a percentage of net revenue was 33.6% in fiscal
2002 compared to 34.9% in fiscal 2001. We experienced a downward trend in fiscal
2002 compared to fiscal 2001 due to decreases in manufacturing volume. As less
labor and overhead expense is absorbed into inventory, costs become higher on a
relative basis, which is reflected in our lower margins.
Research, Development and Engineering Expenses. Research, development and
engineering expenses declined on an absolute basis in fiscal 2002, but increased
as a percentage of net revenues. Research, development and engineering expenses
decreased by 10.1% to $20.4 million, or 35.8% of net revenues in fiscal 2002,
from $22.7 million, or 22.7% of net revenues in fiscal 2001. Expenses in fiscal
2002 included two of the five required quarterly expenditures which were
commitments under a joint development agreement with JDS Uniphase Corporation.
This development agreement was terminated in the second quarter of fiscal 2003.
Historically, we have been involved in several federally-funded consortiums,
which partially offset some of our research and development expenses. We
completed the last of these funded projects in early fiscal 2001. We did not
enter into any such consortiums in fiscal 2002.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and
administrative expenses decreased 19.5% to $29.0 million or 50.8% of net
revenues in 2002 from $36.0 million or 35.9% of net revenues in 2001. The
decreased level of expense was primarily attributable to restructuring
activities and other cost reduction measures implemented over three quarters of
fiscal 2002. Cost reduction measures included salary cuts ranging from 5% to 20%
and company-wide vacation weeks in the first, second and third fiscal quarters,
which resulted in approximately $1.2 million of expense savings as compared to
the prior year. Additional cost reduction measures implemented as a result of
restructuring activities included significant reductions in headcount,
consolidation of facilities, elimination of some excess capacity and the sale of
certain non-strategic assets. Restructuring activities are described in more
detail below. Salary and related expenses were reduced by approximately $3.3
million from fiscal 2001 as a result of headcount reductions. Depreciation
expenses were reduced by approximately $0.6 million from fiscal 2001 and rent
and related expenses were reduced by approximately $0.5 million from fiscal 2001
due to consolidation of facilities. Savings realized by quarter as a result of
the combined restructuring and other cost reduction measures during the fiscal
year were consistent with our projections and were as follows:
Fiscal 2002
----------------------------------------------------
(In thousands)
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Cost Savings $ 1,083 $ 1,438 $ 1,496 $ 1,573
Restructuring Charges. In connection with our 2002 restructuring, we recorded
$17.7 million in restructuring charges. The charges consist of $9.2 million in
restructuring of non-strategic business assets, $6.8 million in lease
commitments for idle facilities, and $1.7 million in workforce reduction and
severance costs. Workforce reduction related costs of $1.7 million represent a
reduction of approximately 114 employees in most functional areas across all
three of our reportable business segments. At June 30, 2002, all of the affected
employees had ceased employment with Adept. Lease commitments for idle
facilities of $6.8 million resulted from the consolidation of manufacturing
facilities in San Jose and Livermore, California into our technology center in
Livermore, California, plus the consolidation of certain support facilities in
Europe. The consolidation of these facilities resulted in operating lease
commitments in excess of our then current and projected needs for leased
properties. Asset impairment charges of $9.2 million resulted from the exiting
of certain non-strategic product lines of $6.6 million and goodwill and other
29
intangible assets write-off of $2.6 million. The goodwill and other intangible
assets written off resulted from our acquisition of Pensar-Tucson in April 2000,
which no longer had value to Adept due to the closure of our Tucson Arizona
operations in March 2002. At June 30, 2002, the long term accrued restructuring
charges were related to future rent commitments on non-cancelable lease
agreements. We completed our fiscal 2002 restructuring plan in the third quarter
of fiscal 2002.
Goodwill and Other Intangibles Amortization. Goodwill and other intangibles
amortization in 2002 decreased to $0.7 million from $6.8 million in 2001. The
decrease in goodwill and other intangibles amortization was a direct result of
the adoption of SFAS 142, effectively discontinuing the amortization of
goodwill.
Impairment of goodwill. We recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $6.6 million
as a result of our annual impairment update conducted in the third quarter of
fiscal 2002 required by SFAS 142. See Note 4 of our Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further
discussion.
Gain on Sale of Assets. Net gain on sale of assets was $1.6 million in 2002 due
to the sale of the CimStation Inspection product line of our SILMA business, as
discussed above. In addition, we incurred $21,000 in transactions costs related
to the sale of the CimStation Inspection assets resulting in net proceeds of
$1.73 million. The gain on sale of the Cimstation Inspection assets was
partially offset by a loss on sale of other assets of $0.18 million. There was
no gain on sale of assets in fiscal 2001.
Interest and Other Income, Net. Interest income, net, in 2002 was $438,000
compared to $733,000 in 2001, with higher average invested cash balances offset
by lower average yields.
Provision for (Benefit From) Income Taxes. Our effective tax rate for 2002 was
(6%) as compared to 18% for 2001. Our tax rate for 2002 differed from the
federal statutory income tax rate of 34% primarily due to a $3.6 million tax
refund resulting from the carry back of our net operating loss from the year
ended June 30, 2001. In 2001, our tax rate differed from the federal statutory
rate of 34% primarily due to the increase in valuation allowance to fully offset
deferred tax assets.
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle. We recorded $10.0 million
as a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle in 2002 resulting from
our adoption of SFAS 142. We implemented SFAS 142 on July 1, 2001 and completed
the measurement of the impairment loss in the third quarter of fiscal 2002.
Derivative Financial Instruments. Our foreign currency hedging program was used
to hedge our exposure to foreign currency exchange risk on local international
operational assets and liabilities. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on
forward currency contracts that were effective as hedges of assets and
liabilities were recognized in income as a component of selling, general and
administrative expenses. We recognized a loss on forward currency contracts of
$728,000 for the year ended June 30, 2002 and a gain of $322,000 for the year
ended June 30, 2001. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on instruments
that hedge firm commitments were deferred and included in the measurement of the
subsequent transaction; however, losses were deferred only to the extent of
expected gains on the future commitment at June 30, 2002. We deferred
recognition of a transaction loss relating to foreign exchange contracts of
$83,500 in fiscal 2002, and realized this transaction loss in the first quarter
of 2003. In March 2003, we determined that our international activities held or
conducted in foreign currency did not warrant the cost associated with a hedging
program due to decreased exposure of foreign currency exchange risk on
international operational assets and liabilities. As a result, we suspended our
foreign currency hedging program in March 2003.
Impact of Inflation
The effect of inflation on our business and financial position has not been
significant to date.
Long-Lived Assets
Financial information regarding the geographic areas of our long-lived assets is
included in Note 13 of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
30
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have experienced declining revenues and incurred operating losses in each of
the last three fiscal years. During this period, we have also consumed
significant cash and other financial resources, and presently have minimal
liquidity. In response to these conditions, we reduced operating costs and
employee headcount, and restructured certain operating lease commitments in
fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2003. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, we
reduced our headcount by an additional 7% of our total employees, which we
expect to fully implement the second quarter of fiscal 2004. These adjustments
to our operations have significantly reduced our cash consumption and the
aggregate revenue levels necessary to achieve break-even operating results. In
addition, we intend to seek an expansion of our existing working capital
receivables financing facility, or secure an alternative credit facility to
improve our near term liquidity. Furthermore, we continue to pursue outside debt
and equity sources of financing that can provide Adept with a longer term source
of capital and generally improve its balance sheet and financial stability.
We are in a very precarious cash position, and because of certain regulatory
restrictions on our ability to move certain cash reserves from our foreign
operations to our U.S. operations, we may have limited access to a portion of
our existing cash balances. As of June 30, 2003, we had an aggregate cash
balance of $3.3 million, and a short term receivables financing credit facility
of $1.75 million net, of which $90 thousand was outstanding and $1.7 remained
available under this facility. We currently depend on funds generated from
operating revenue and the funds available through our accounts receivable
financing arrangement to meet our operating requirements. As a result, if our
assumptions are incorrect, we may have insufficient cash resources to satisfy
our obligations in a timely manner during the next twelve months. We expect our
cash ending balance to be approximately $1.8 million as of September 30, 2003.
The decrease in our expected cash balance from June 30, 2003 is primarily due to
increases in prepaid expenses related to insurance premiums, and an expected
loss on operations for the first quarter of fiscal 2004. Recently, we have
managed to finance our operating losses by converting non-cash working capital
items such as accounts receivable and inventory, to cash, and consequently,
these working capital components have been significantly reduced over the last
several quarters. If the company continues to generate a loss on operations, it
will become increasingly difficult to rely on funding these losses by
liquidating working capital. Our ability to sustain operations through fiscal
2004 is predicated upon certain critical assumptions, including (i) that our
restructuring efforts do effectively reduce operating costs as estimated by
management and do not impair our ability to generate revenue, (ii) that we are
able to favorably settle pending litigation related to our San Jose lease,
including both the aggregate amount and the timing of any settlement payments,
(iv) that we will not incur additional unplanned capital expenditures in fiscal
2004, (v) that we will continue to receive funds under our existing accounts
receivable financing arrangement or a new credit facility, (vi) that we will
receive continued timely receipt of payment of outstanding receivables, and not
otherwise experience severe cyclical swings in our receipts resulting in a
shortfall of cash available for our disbursements during any given quarter, and
(vii) that we will not incur unexpected significant cash outlays during any
quarter.
Adept is currently litigating with the landlord of our San Jose facility
regarding our lease obligations for that facility. We have vacated and no longer
pay rent on this facility. We have recorded expenses in the amount of $2.3
million for the remaining unpaid rent associated with this lease; however, we
have not reserved the cash associated with such unpaid rent expenses. Our cash
usage for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 and our expectations for cash usage
for the first two quarters of fiscal 2004 are significantly impacted by our
nonpayment of rent for this facility. If we receive a material adverse judgment
in the San Jose lease litigation and do not have control of the timing of the
payments of any such judgment, we may not have sufficient cash to meet our
obligations and therefore, we may be required to cease operations. For a
description of this litigation, see "Legal Proceedings."
Even if we do not receive an adverse judgment in the San Jose lease litigation,
if the results of our search for additional outside sources of financing are
unsuccessful, or if adequate funds are not available on acceptable terms or at
all and we are unable to achieve our projected revenues or if operating expenses
exceed current estimates, we will be forced to curtail our operations and we may
not be able to take advantage of market opportunities, develop or enhance new
products, pursue acquisitions that would complement our existing product
offerings or enhance our technical capabilities, execute our business plan or
otherwise respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated requirements. Even
if we complete a financing, the transaction is likely to involve the incurrence
of debt or issuance of debt or equity securities of Adept, which would dilute
the outstanding equity.
31
The consolidated financial statements accompanying this Annual Report on Form
10-K have been prepared assuming that Adept will continue as a going concern.
However, the accompanying Independent Auditors' Report states that we have
incurred recurring operating losses, have a net capital deficiency and have
experienced a declining cash balance which have adversely affected our liquidity
and that these conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue
as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments to
reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of
assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the
outcome of this uncertainty.
Cash and cash equivalents decreased $14.1 million from June 30, 2002. Net cash
used in operating activities of $18.1 million was primarily attributable to the
net loss and a decrease in other accrued liabilities reduced by non cash charges
including depreciation and amortization, provisions for inventory reserves, the
issuance of a subordinate convertible note offset in part by a decrease in
accounts receivable and a decrease in inventory.
The decrease in other accrued liabilities is primarily attributable to payments
made as purchase price consideration related to the acquisition of CHAD. The
provision for inventory is primarily related to provisions for excess inventory.
The issuance of a convertible subordinated note relates to the restructuring of
our lease commitment for our Livermore facilities (See Note 7).
Cash provided by investing activities of $3.7 million is primarily due to the
sale of short-term investments of $13.6 million offset in part by the purchase
of short-term investments of $9.3 million, business acquisition costs of $0.2
million in connection with the acquisition of Meta and property and equipment
purchases of $0.4 million.
Cash provided by financing activities of $0.2 million was related to proceeds
from our employee stock purchase plan.
On March 21, 2003, we entered into an Accounts Receivable Purchase Agreement
(the "Purchase Agreement") with Silicon Valley Bank ("SVB"), pursuant to which
SVB may purchase certain of our receivables on a full recourse basis for an
advance amount equal to 70% (such percentage may change at SVB's discretion) of
the face amount of such purchased receivables with the aggregate face amount of
purchased receivables not to exceed $2.5 million. Upon collection of the
receivable and after deducting interest charges and allowed fees SVB will remit
the balance of the remaining 30% of the invoice to the Company. In connection
with the Purchase Agreement, we granted to SVB a security interest in
substantially all of our assets. We also issued SVB a warrant to purchase an
aggregate of 100,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $1.00 per share.
The warrant may be exercised on or after September 21, 2003, expires March 21,
2008 and was valued at $20,000 by the Company using the Black Scholes model. As
of June 30, 2003, $97,000 was outstanding under the Purchase Agreement. The
Purchase Agreement includes certain covenants with which we must comply,
including but not limited to that we are required to pay a monthly finance
charge equal to 2% of the average daily gross amount of unpaid purchased
receivables, pay our employee payroll and state and federal tax obligations as
and when due, provide SVB with certain financial and other specified information
on a periodic basis, and maintain our deposit and investment accounts with SVB.
In addition, we cannot transfer or grant a security interest in our assets
without SVB's consent, except for certain ordinary course transactions, file a
voluntary petition for bankruptcy or have filed against us an involuntary
petition for relief, or make any transfers to any of our subsidiaries of money
or other assets with an aggregate value in excess of $0.24 million in any fiscal
quarter, net of any payments by such subsidiaries to us. Certain of our
wholly-owned subsidiaries were also required to execute a guaranty of all of our
obligations to SVB and all such guaranties have been executed. We will be deemed
to be in default under the Purchase Agreement if we fail to timely pay any
amount owed; in the event of our bankruptcy or an assignment for the benefit of
creditors; if we become insolvent or are generally not paying our debts as they
become due or we are left with unreasonably small capital; if any involuntary
lien or attachment is issued against our assets that is not discharged within 10
days; if we materially breach any of our representations or if we breach any
covenant or agreement under the agreement which is not cured within three
business days; if any event of default occurs under any agreement between us and
SVB, any guaranty or subordination agreement executed in connection with the
Purchase Agreement or any agreement between us and JDSU; or if there is a
material adverse change in our business, operations or condition or a material
impairment of our ability to pay our obligations under the agreement or of the
value of SVB's security interest in our assets. In the event of a default under
the Purchase Agreement, SVB may cease buying our receivables, Adept must
repurchase upon SVB's demand any outstanding receivables and pay any obligations
under the agreement, including SVB's costs. As of June 30, 2003, Adept was in
compliance with the terms of the purchase agreement.
32
During fiscal 2003, we reduced our headcount by an additional 84 people, which
we expect will result in approximately $1.5 million per quarter in cash savings
as compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2002 when fully implemented in
the second quarter of fiscal 2004. Finally, we are accelerating the phase-in of
newer generation products that we expect will reduce the amount of inventory
that Adept will need to maintain by approximately $0.5 million per quarter at
the product shipment level of the quarter ended June 30, 2003.
On October 29, 2001, we completed a private placement with JDS Uniphase
Corporation of $25.0 million in our convertible preferred stock consisting of
78,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and 22,000 shares of
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock. Both the Series A Preferred and the Series
B Preferred are entitled to annual dividends at a rate of $15 per share.
Dividends are cumulative, and accrued and unpaid dividends are payable only in
the event of certain liquidity events as defined in the statement of preferences
of the Preferred Stock, such as a change of control or liquidation or
dissolution of Adept. No dividends on our common stock may be paid until
dividends for the fiscal year and any prior years on the Preferred Stock have
been paid or set apart, and the Preferred Stock will participate in any
dividends paid to the common stock on an as-converted basis. The Preferred Stock
may be converted into shares of our common stock at any time, and in the absence
of a liquidity event or earlier conversion or redemption, will be converted into
common stock upon October 29, 2004 (the "Automatic Conversion Date"). We have
agreed to use our reasonable commercial efforts to seek shareholder approval to
extend this Automatic Conversion Date for the Preferred Stock until October 29,
2005. The Preferred Stock may be converted into shares of our common stock at a
rate of the initial purchase price divided by a denominator equal to the lesser
of $8.18, or 75% of the 30 day average closing price of our Common Stock
immediately preceding the conversion date. However, as a result of a waiver of
events of default by the preferred stockholder, other than in connection with
certain liquidity events that are not approved by the Board of Directors of
Adept, in no event shall the denominator for the determination of the conversion
rate with respect to the Series B Preferred be less than $4.09 and with respect
to the Series A Preferred be less than $2.05, even if the Conversion Date Price
is less than $4.09 and $2.05, respectively. With respect to the Series A
Preferred, the conversion price could potentially be less than the fair value of
the common stock at the date the preferred stock was issued. The resulting
beneficial conversion amount, if any, would be recorded as a preferred stock
dividend and shown as a reduction in net income applicable to common
shareholders. The Preferred Stock shall not be convertible, in the aggregate,
into 20% or more of our outstanding voting securities and no holder of Preferred
Stock may convert shares of Preferred Stock if, after the conversion, the holder
will hold 20% or more of our outstanding voting securities. Shares not permitted
to be converted remain outstanding, unless redeemed, and become convertible when
such holder holds less than 20% of our outstanding voting securities. As a
result, as the number of outstanding shares of common stock of Adept increases,
including as the result of the exercise or conversion of options, warrants or
convertible notes and as the number of shares held by the preferred stockholder
decreases, the number of shares into which the Preferred Stock may be
convertible proportionately increases. The Preferred Stock has voting rights
equal to the number of shares into which the Preferred Stock could be converted
as determined in the designation of preferences assuming a conversion rate of
$250.00 divided by $8.18.
Barring the occurrence of certain liquidity events that are not approved by the
Board of Directors of Adept, if the Conversion Date Price on the Automatic
Conversion Date is lower than $2.05, then the denominator for the calculation of
the conversion of the Preferred Stock described above will be $4.09 for the
Series B Preferred Stock and $2.05 for the Series A Preferred Stock. In
addition, because accrued and unpaid dividends are payable only in the event of
certain liquidity events as defined in the designation of preferences of the
Preferred Stock, as described above, barring the prior occurrence of such a
liquidity event, no cash dividends will be payable at the Automatic Conversion
Date.
We have the right, but not the obligation, to redeem shares of the Series A
Preferred elected to be converted by the preferred stockholder which, upon
conversion would use the denominator of $2.05 for determination of the
conversion rate and would result in the issuance of shares of common stock in
excess of the number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion using a
denominator of $4.09 for determination of the conversion rate. The number of
shares of Series A Preferred that Adept may elect to redeem would be calculated
by subtracting (i) the number of shares of common stock that the shares of
Series A Preferred that have been elected to be converted would be convertible
into based on a denominator of $4.09 from (ii) the number of shares of common
stock that the shares of Series A Preferred that have been elected to be
converted would be convertible into based on a denominator of $2.05, and then
determining the number of shares of Series A Preferred that this number of
33
shares of common stock represents using a denominator of $4.09. The redemption
price is equal to the sum of the initial Preferred Stock price plus all
cumulated and unpaid dividends. The redemption shall be paid in the form of a
senior unsecured promissory note bearing interest at a rate of 6% per annum,
maturing in two years. If we redeem shares of Preferred Stock using a promissory
note, any indebtedness incurred while the note is outstanding must be
subordinated to the note, other than certain ordinary course financings. In
addition, the holders of the Preferred Stock are entitled to receive, upon
liquidation, the amount equal to $250.00 per share (adjusted for any stock
splits or stock dividends) plus any unpaid dividends. The liquidation preference
may be triggered by several events consisting of a change in control of Adept, a
sale of substantially all of Adept's assets, shareholder approval of any plan of
liquidation or dissolution or the direct or indirect beneficial ownership of
more than 50% of Adept's common stock by any person or entity. Since such
changes may be outside of management's control and would trigger payment of the
Preferred Stock liquidation preference, the Preferred Stock is classified
outside of shareholders' equity as redeemable convertible preferred stock in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
In December 2002, Adept and JDS Uniphase agreed to terminate the supply,
development and license agreement entered into by them in October 2001. Under
this agreement, we were obligated to work with JDS Uniphase's internal
automation organization, referred to as Optical Process Automation, or OPA, to
develop solutions for component and module manufacturing processes for
sub-micron tolerance assemblies. JDS Uniphase retained sole rights for
fiberoptic applications developed under this contract. For non-fiberoptic
applications of component and module manufacturing processes developed by OPA,
we were obligated to pay up to $1.0 million each fiscal quarter for the planned
five-quarter effort. Due to changing economic and business circumstances and the
curtailment of development by JDS Uniphase and termination of their OPA
operations, both parties determined that these development services were no
longer in their mutual best interests. As part of the termination, Adept
executed a $1.0 million promissory note in favor of JDS Uniphase earning
interest at a rate of 7% per year payable on or before September 30, 2004. JDS
Uniphase has the right to require Adept to apply any additional financing
received prior to maturity first to repayment of the outstanding balance under
the promissory note. JDS Uniphase waived this right in connection with our
receivables purchase facility with Silicon Valley Bank and the convertible note
issued to the landlord of our Livermore, California facilities. In addition, in
the event of Adept's insolvency or inability to pay its debts when they become
due, an event of default occurs under the promissory note. An event of default
will result in the immediate acceleration of the promissory note and the unpaid
balance and all accrued interest will become immediately due and payable. The
payments made prior to termination plus the promissory note represent payment in
full by Adept for the development services performed by JDS Uniphase, and there
are no remaining payment obligations arising from the agreement. All licenses,
licensing rights and other rights and obligations arising from the development
work performed under the contract before termination survive its termination.
Adept also agreed to seek shareholder approval to amend the date that the
preferred stock held by JDS Uniphase automatically converts into Adept common
stock from October 29, 2004 to October 29, 2005 to allow JDS Uniphase an
additional year to maintain its position as a preferred stockholder or convert
the Preferred Stock into shares of Adept's common stock.
Pursuant to the terms of the CHAD acquisition agreement, we paid $2.6 million to
the shareholders of CHAD on October 9, 2002. On December 13, 2002, CHAD and
Adept amended the second anniversary promissory note due to a former shareholder
of CHAD and the funds held in escrow to secure the promissory note were released
to Adept. The second anniversary promissory note was paid in full in February
2003.
In addition, the acquisition agreement provides for Adept to make cash payments
of $242,000 and potential stock issuances consisting of 61,000 shares equal to
approximately $467,000 over a period of three years after the closing date to
certain specified employees of CHAD, which are contingent on the continued
employment of such employees. As of June 30, 2003, 57,000 shares were issued and
$167,000 in cash was paid to certain specified employees of CHAD. At June 30,
2003, $65,000 in contingent cash and no contingent shares remain to be paid by
October 9, 2004, contingent on the continued employment of certain specified
employees. This acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of
accounting.
On August 6, 2003, we completed a lease restructuring with Tri-Valley Campus
LLC, the landlord for our Livermore, California corporate headquarters and
facilities, which is expected to significantly reduce our quarterly lease
expenses. Under the lease amendment, we were released of our lease obligations
for two unoccupied buildings in Livermore and received a rent reduction on the
occupied building from $1.55 to $1.10 per square foot. In addition, the lease
amendment carries liquidated damages in the event of default on the lease
payments equivalent to 1 year of rent obligations on the original lease. In the
event of Adept's bankruptcy or a failure to make payments to the landlord of our
34
Livermore, California facilities within three days after a written notice from
the landlord, a default would be triggered on the lease. In connection with the
lease restructuring, we issued a three year, $3.0 million convertible
subordinated note due June 30, 2006 in favor of the landlord bearing an annual
interest rate of 6.0% payable at our option in shares of our common stock at a
conversion price of $1.00 per share and the resulting shares carry certain
registration and other rights. This liability was recorded as long term
Subordinated Convertible Note in the accompanying balance sheet with the
corresponding reduction to accrued unpaid rent on Livermore facilities and
additional restructuring charges for the excess of the note amount over accrued
unpaid rent on Livermore facilities. Payment under the note will be accelerated
in the event of a default, including the insolvency or bankruptcy of Adept,
Adept's failure to pay its obligations under the note when due, Adept's default
on certain material agreements, including the Livermore lease, the occurrence of
a material adverse change with respect to Adept's business or ability to pay its
obligations under the note, or a change of control of Adept without the
landlord's consent.
Acquisitions
On August 30, 2002, we completed the acquisition of a controlling interest in
Meta Control Technologies, Inc., or Meta, a Delaware corporation. Meta develops,
designs, manufactures and markets products that automate a wide range of
manufacturing processes requiring precise motion, accurate machine vision and
rapid process instrumentation. Some of the applications that make use of our
technology include semiconductor and electronics assembly, micro-mechanical and
fiber optic assembly, laboratory automation and discrete process automation. The
acquisition of Meta extends our controls architecture to include two axis, low
power controls in small packages allowing remote placement of motion and sensor
controls that directly plug into our new architecture using IEEE 1394 Firewire
technology. In addition, Meta has a line of programmable cameras that when
combined with the low power controller and our HexSight software can be packaged
as a very low cost, competitive OEM product. The results of Meta's operations
have been included in our consolidated financial statements since August 30,
2002.
Upon the closing of the acquisition transaction with Meta, we acquired a 67%
ownership interest in Meta, with the remaining 33% ownership interest in Meta
being held by one shareholder. The acquisition agreement provides that Adept
will acquire all of these remaining shares in return for the provision of
discounts and royalty payments to the shareholder and its affiliates as
described in the paragraph below but will, in any event and regardless of
whether discounts are incurred or royalties paid, acquire 100% of the stock of
Meta no later than August 2008 for no additional consideration.
Under the terms of the acquisition agreement, we issued 730,000 shares of our
common stock to the shareholders of Meta with a value of $825,000. The value of
the 730,000 shares was determined based on the average closing price of Adept's
stock for the period of three trading days ended September 3, 2002. Ten percent
of the 730,000 shares of common stock were placed into escrow for one year from
the completion of the acquisition pending certain contingencies under the terms
of the acquisition agreement. The escrow shares were released in full to the
former Meta stockholders. Additionally, Adept agreed to provide up to $1.7
million of discounts and royalties through August 2008 to a shareholder of Meta
based upon future sales to that shareholder or certain of its affiliates. Such
amounts will be charged to operations when incurred. As of June 30, 2003 we have
not incurred any expenses related to the discounts and royalties. In connection
with the acquisition, we assumed a $500,000 line of credit with Meta's lender,
Paragon Commercial Bank bearing interest at 1% plus the prime rate announced
from time to time by the Wall Street Journal. In March 2003, we terminated the
$500,000 line of credit with Paragon Commercial Bank and paid the outstanding
balance with the funds used to secure the line of credit to reduce interest
expense associated with the line of credit. Additionally, we entered into a loan
agreement for up to $800,000 with a former shareholder of Meta and issued into
escrow for the benefit of the lender 100,000 shares of the Company's common
stock valued at $113,000, subject to certain cancellation rights. In March 2003,
Adept and the former shareholder terminated the $800,000 loan agreement, and we
cancelled the 100,000 shares previously issued. No amounts were ever borrowed
under the loan agreement.
35
New Accounting Pronouncements
In July of 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated
with Exit or Disposal Activities." SFAS No. 146 addresses the financial
accounting and reporting for obligations associated with an exit activity,
including restructuring, or with a disposal of long-lived assets. Exit
activities include, but are not limited to eliminating or reducing product
lines, terminating employees and contracts, and relocating plant facilities or
personnel. SFAS No. 146 specifies that a company will record a liability for a
cost associated with an exit or disposal activity only when that liability is
incurred and can be measured at fair value. Therefore, a commitment to an exit
plan or a plan of disposal expresses only our intended future actions and,
therefore, does not meet the requirement for recognizing a liability and the
related expense. SFAS No. 146 is effective prospectively for exit or disposal
activities initiated after December 31, 2002. The adoption of SFAS No. 146 did
not have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.
In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45, "Guarantor's Accounting
and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Guarantees of Indebtedness
of Others" (FIN 45). The Interpretation elaborates on the existing disclosure
requirements for most guarantees, including product warranties. The
Interpretation requires that at the time a company issues certain guarantees,
the company must recognize an initial liability for the fair value, or market
value, of the obligations it assumes under that guarantee and must disclose that
information in its interim and annual financial statements. The initial
recognition and initial measurement provisions of the Interpretation are
applicable on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after
December 31, 2002. The Interpretation's disclosure requirements are effective
for financial statements of interim or annual periods ending after December 15,
2002 and are applicable to all guarantees issued by the guarantor subject to the
Interpretation's scope, including guarantees issued prior to the issuance of the
Interpretation. We adopted the Interpretation effective for the fiscal quarter
ended December 28, 2002. As we have not made any significant financial
guarantees other than product warranties, the adoption of FIN 45 did not have a
material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation - Transition and Disclosure," which is effective for fiscal years
ending after December 15, 2002. SFAS 148 amends SFAS 123, "Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation," to provide alternative methods of transition to SFAS
123's fair value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation.
SFAS 148 also amends the disclosure provisions of SFAS 123 and APB Opinion No.
28, "Interim Financial Reporting," to require disclosure in the summary of
significant accounting policies of the effect of an entity's accounting policy
with respect to stock-based employee compensation on reported net income and
earnings per share in annual and interim financial statements. The transition
methods of SFAS 148 are effective for Adept's June 30, 2003 Form 10-K. Adept
continues to use the intrinsic value method of accounting for stock-based
compensation. As a result, the transition provisions will not have an effect on
our consolidated financial statements. We have adopted the disclosure
requirements of SFAS 148 (See Note 1).
In November 2002, the EITF reached a consensus on Issue No. 00-21, "Revenue
Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables." EITF Issue No. 00-21 provides guidance
on how to account for arrangements that involve the delivery or performance of
multiple products, services, and/or rights to use assets. The provisions of EITF
Issue No. 00-21 will apply to revenue arrangements entered into in fiscal
periods beginning after June 15, 2003. We are currently evaluating the effect
that the adoption of EITF Issue No. 00-21 will have on our financial condition
and results of operations.
In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an
Interpretation of ARB No. 51" (FIN 46). FIN 46 requires certain variable
interest entities to be consolidated by the primary beneficiary of the entity if
the equity investors in the entity do not have the characteristics of a
controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the
entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial
support from other parties. FIN 46 is effective for all new variable interest
entities created or acquired after January 31, 2003. For variable interest
entities created or acquired prior to February 1, 2003, the provision of FIN 46
must be applied for the first interim or annual period beginning after June 15,
2003. The adoption of FIN 46 did not have a material impact on our financial
position or results of operations.
36
FACTORS AFFECTING FUTURE OPERATING RESULTS
Risks Related to Our Business
We have limited cash resources, and our recurring operating losses, negative
cash flow and debt obligations could exhaust these cash resources. We are
attempting to raise additional capital, but we may not be able to obtain
adequate funds to continue our operations in the future.
We have experienced declining revenues and incurred operating losses in each of
the last three fiscal years. At June 30, 2003, we had a net capital deficiency
of $11.6 million. During this period, we have also consumed significant cash and
other financial resources, and presently have minimal liquidity. In response to
these conditions, we reduced operating costs and employee headcount, and
restructured certain operating lease commitments in fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2003.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, we reduced our headcount by an
additional 7% of our total employees, which we expect to fully implement by the
second quarter of fiscal 2004. These adjustments to our operations have
significantly reduced our cash consumption and the aggregate revenue levels
necessary to achieve break-even operating results. In addition, we intend to
seek an expansion of our existing working capital receivables financing
facility, or secure an alternative credit facility to improve our near term
liquidity. Furthermore, we continue to pursue outside debt and equity sources of
financing that can provide Adept with a longer term source of capital and
generally improve its balance sheet and financial stability.
As of June 30, 2003, we had working capital of approximately $7.2 million,
including $3.2 million in cash and cash equivalents. We are in a very precarious
cash position, and because of certain regulatory restrictions on our ability to
move certain cash reserves from our foreign operations to our U.S. operations,
we may have limited access to a portion of our existing cash balances. As of
June 30, 2003, we had an aggregate cash balance of $3.3 million, and a short
term receivables financing credit facility of $1.75 million net, of which $90
thousand was outstanding and $1.7 remained available under this facility. We
currently depend on funds generated from operating revenue and the funds
available through our accounts receivable financing arrangement to meet our
operating requirements. We expect our cash ending balance to be approximately
$1.8 million as of September 30, 2003. The decrease in our expected cash balance
from June 30, 2003 is primarily due to increases in prepaid expenses related to
insurance premiums, and an expected loss on operations for the first quarter of
fiscal 2004. Recently, we have managed to finance our operating losses by
converting non-cash working capital items such as accounts receivable and
inventory, to cash, and consequently, these working capital components have been
significantly reduced over the last several quarters. If we continue to generate
a loss on operations, it will become increasingly difficult to rely on funding
these losses by liquidating working capital. Our ability to sustain operations
through fiscal 2004 is predicated upon certain critical assumptions, including
(i) that our restructuring efforts do effectively reduce operating costs as
estimated by management and do not impair our ability to generate revenue, (ii)
that we are able to favorably settle pending litigation related to our San Jose
lease, including both the aggregate amount and the timing of any settlement
payments, (iv) that we will not incur additional unplanned capital expenditures
in fiscal 2004, (v) that we will continue to receive funds under our existing
accounts receivable financing arrangement or a new credit facility, (vi) that we
will receive continued timely receipt of payment of outstanding receivables, and
not otherwise experience severe cyclical swings in our receipts resulting in a
shortfall of cash available for our disbursements during any given quarter, and
(vii) that we will not incur unexpected significant cash outlays during any
quarter. In addition, a significant portion of or shipments and therefore
invoicing occurs during the final month of each quarter, this causes our
collections to be uneven and places constraints on our ability to manage cash
flows during the subsequent quarter. As a result, if our assumptions are
incorrect, we may have insufficient cash resources to satisfy our obligations in
a timely manner during the next twelve months.
We are currently litigating with the landlord of our San Jose facility regarding
our lease obligations for that facility. We have vacated and no longer pay rent
on this facility. We have recorded expenses in the amount of $2.3 million for
the remaining unpaid rent associated with this lease; however, we have not
reserved the cash associated with such unpaid rent expenses. Our cash usage for
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 and our expectations for cash usage for the
first two quarters of fiscal 2004 are significantly impacted by our nonpayment
of rent for this facility. If we receive a material adverse judgment in the San
Jose lease litigation and do not have control of the timing of the payments of
any such judgment, we may not have sufficient cash to meet our obligations and
therefore, we may be required to cease operations. For a description of this
litigation, see "Legal Proceedings."
Even if we do not receive an adverse judgment in the San Jose lease litigation,
if the results of our search for additional outside sources of financing are
unsuccessful, or if adequate funds are not available on acceptable terms or at
all and we are unable to achieve our projected revenues or if operating expenses
exceed current estimates, we will be forced to curtail our operations and we may
not be able to take advantage of market opportunities, develop or enhance new
37
products, pursue acquisitions that would complement our existing product
offerings or enhance our technical capabilities, execute our business plan or
otherwise respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated requirements. Even
if we complete a financing, the transaction is likely to involve the incurrence
of debt or issuance of debt or equity securities of Adept, which would dilute
the outstanding equity.
The consolidated financial statements accompanying this Annual Report on Form
10-K have been prepared assuming that Adept will continue as a going concern.
However, the accompanying Independent Auditors' Report states that we have
incurred recurring operating losses, have a net capital deficiency and have
experienced a declining cash balance which have adversely affected our liquidity
and that these conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue
as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments to
reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of
assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the
outcome of this uncertainty.
We cannot predict with any degree of certainty when, or if, such operating and
net losses will cease and we will begin to realize operating and net profits. We
cannot assure you that we will be able to raise additional financing to meet our
cash and operational needs or reduce our operating expenses or increase revenues
significantly to address our operating cash needs.
You should not rely on our past results to predict our future performance
because our operating results fluctuate due to factors, which are difficult to
forecast, are often out of our control and which can be extremely volatile.
Our past revenues and other operating results may not be accurate indicators of
our future performance. Our operating results have been subject to significant
fluctuations in the past, and we expect this to continue in the future. The
factors that may contribute to these fluctuations include:
o our ability to obtain additional liquidity, including sources of
financing;
o the results of our litigation concerning one of our facilities
leases;
o the likelihood that our primary suppliers would begin requesting
cash in advance or at minimum be reluctant to continue with existing
terms where those terms extend beyond customary industry averages if
our financial condition further deteriorates;
o fluctuations in aggregate capital spending, cyclicality and other
economic conditions domestically and internationally in one or more
industries in which we sell our products;
o reductions in demand due to customer concerns over our financial
situation and perceived future viability as a supplier;
o changes or reductions in demand in the communications,
semiconductor, and electronics industries and other markets we
serve;
o timing of our revenue receipts and our required disbursements;
o a change in market acceptance of our products or a shift in demand
for our products;
o new product introductions by us or by our competitors;
o changes in product mix and pricing by us, our suppliers or our
competitors;
o pricing and related availability of components and raw materials for
our products;
o our failure to manufacture a sufficient volume of products in a
timely and cost-effective manner;
o our failure to anticipate the changing product requirements of our
customers;
o changes in the mix of sales by distribution channels;
o exchange rate fluctuations;
o extraordinary events such as litigation or acquisitions;
o decline or slower than expected growth in those industries requiring
precision assembly automation; and
o slower than expected adoption of distributed controls architecture
or the adoption of alternative automated technologies.
Our gross margins may vary greatly depending on the mix of sales of lower margin
hardware products, particularly mechanical subsystems purchased from third party
vendors, volume variances driven by substantially lower production volumes, and
higher margin software products.
38
Our operating results are also affected by general economic and other conditions
affecting the timing of customer orders and capital spending. For example, our
operations during the first quarter of fiscal 2000 and each of the last three
fiscal years were adversely affected by a continuing downturn in hardware
purchases by customers in the electronics industry, particularly disk-drive
manufacturers and to a lesser extent communication manufacturers. In addition,
we experienced significantly reduced demand during fiscal 2002 and 2003 in our
base industries, especially the electronics and semiconductor industries, as our
customers reduced inventories as they adjusted their businesses from a period of
high growth to lower rates of growth or downsizing. We expect this downturn to
adversely affect our business for an indefinite time and cannot estimate when or
if a sustained revival in these key hardware markets and the semiconductor and
electronics industries will occur.
We generally recognize product revenue upon shipment or, for certain
international sales, upon receipt and acceptance by the customers. As a result,
our net revenues and results of operations for a fiscal period will be affected
by the timing of orders received and orders shipped during the period. A delay
in shipments near the end of a fiscal period, for example, due to product
development delays or delays in obtaining materials may cause sales to fall
below expectations and harm our operating results for the period.
In addition, our continued investments in research and development, capital
equipment and ongoing customer service and support capabilities result in
significant fixed costs that we cannot reduce rapidly. As a result, if our sales
for a particular fiscal period are below expected levels, our operating results
for the period could be materially adversely affected.
In the event that in some fiscal quarter our net revenues or operating results
fall below the expectations of public market analysts and investors, the price
of our common stock may fall. We may not be able to increase or sustain our
profitability on a quarterly or annual basis in the future.
Sales of our products depend on the capital spending patterns of our customers,
which tend to be cyclical; we are currently experiencing reduced demand in the
electronics and semiconductor industries, which may continue to adversely affect
our revenues.
Intelligent automation systems using our products can range in price from $8,500
to $500,000. Accordingly, our success is directly dependent upon the capital
expenditure budgets of our customers. Our future operations may be subject to
substantial fluctuations as a consequence of domestic and foreign economic
conditions, industry patterns and other factors affecting capital spending.
Although the majority of our international customers are not in the Asia-Pacific
region, we believe that any instability in the Asia-Pacific economies could also
have a material adverse effect on the results of our operations as a result of a
reduction in sales by our customers to those markets. Domestic or international
recessions or a downturn in one or more of our major markets, such as the food,
communications, automotive, electronic, appliance, semiconductor, and life
sciences industries, and resulting cutbacks in capital spending would have a
direct, negative impact on our business. Evidencing the weakness in the
industry, our supply and development agreement with JDS Uniphase was terminated
largely as a result of the termination of JDS Uniphase's Optical Process
Automation operations. We are currently experiencing reduced demand in most of
the industries we serve including the electronics and semiconductor industries
and expect this reduced demand to adversely affect our revenues for an
indefinite period. During fiscal 2001, 2002 and 2003, we received significantly
fewer orders than expected, experienced delivery schedule postponements on
several existing orders and had some order cancellations. Such changes in orders
may adversely affect revenue for future quarters.
We sell some of our products to the semiconductor industry, which is subject to
sudden, extreme, cyclical variations in product supply and demand. The timing,
length and severity of these cycles are difficult to predict. In some cases,
these cycles have lasted more than a year. The industry is currently
experiencing a significant downturn due to decreased worldwide demand for
semiconductors. Semiconductor manufacturers may contribute to these cycles by
misinterpreting the conditions in the industry and over- or under-investing in
semiconductor manufacturing capacity and equipment. We may not be able to
respond effectively to these industry cycles.
Downturns in the semiconductor industry often occur in connection with, or
anticipation of, maturing product cycles for both semiconductor companies and
their customers and declines in general economic conditions. Industry downturns
have been characterized by reduced demand for semiconductor devices and
equipment, production over-capacity and accelerated decline in average selling
prices. During a period of declining demand, we must be able to quickly and
39
effectively reduce expenses and motivate and retain key employees. We
implemented a worldwide restructuring program in fiscal 2002 to realign our
businesses to the changes in our industry and our customers' decrease in capital
spending. We made further cost reductions in fiscal 2003 to further realign our
business. Despite this restructuring activity, our ability to reduce expenses in
response to any downturn in the semiconductor industry is limited by our need
for continued investment in engineering and research and development and
extensive ongoing customer service and support requirements. The long lead time
for production and delivery of some of our products creates a risk that we may
incur expenditures or purchase inventories for products that we cannot sell. We
believe our future performance will continue to be affected by the cyclical
nature of the semiconductor industry, and thus, any future downturn in the
semiconductor industry could therefore harm our revenues and gross margin if
demand drops or average selling prices decline.
Industry upturns have been characterized by abrupt increases in demand for
semiconductor devices and equipment and production under-capacity. During a
period of increasing demand and rapid growth, we must be able to quickly
increase manufacturing capacity to meet customer demand and hire and assimilate
a sufficient number of qualified personnel. Our inability to ramp-up in times of
increased demand could harm our reputation and cause some of our existing or
potential customers to place orders with our competitors.
Because our product sales are seasonal, we may not be able to maintain a steady
revenue stream.
Our product sales are seasonal. We have historically had higher bookings for our
products during the June quarter of each fiscal year and lower bookings during
the September quarter of each fiscal year, due primarily to the slowdown in
sales to European markets and summer vacations. In the event bookings for our
products in the June fiscal quarter are lower than anticipated and our backlog
at the end of the June fiscal quarter is insufficient to compensate for lower
bookings in the September fiscal quarter, our results of operations for the
September fiscal quarter and future quarters will suffer.
A significant percentage of our product shipments occur in the last month of
each fiscal quarter. Historically, this has been due in part, at times, to our
inability to forecast the level of demand for our products or of the product mix
for a particular fiscal quarter. To address this problem we periodically stock
inventory levels of completed robots, machine controllers and certain strategic
components. If shipments of our products fail to meet forecasted levels, the
increased inventory levels and increased operating expenses in anticipation of
sales that do not materialize could adversely affect our business.
Changes in delivery schedules and customer cancellations of orders constituting
our backlog may result in lower than expected revenues.
Backlog should not be relied on as a measure of anticipated demand for our
products or future revenues, because the orders constituting our backlog are
subject to changes in delivery schedules and in certain instances are subject to
cancellation without significant penalty to the customer. Increasingly, our
business is characterized by short-term order and shipment schedules. We have in
the past experienced changes in delivery schedules and customer cancellations
that resulted in our revenues in a given quarter being materially less than
would have been anticipated based on backlog at the beginning of the quarter. We
experienced greater customer delays and cancellations in fiscal 2002 and fiscal
2003, compared to prior periods, and this increase may continue in future
periods. Similar delivery schedule changes and order cancellations may adversely
affect our operating results in the future.
Because we do not have long-term contracts with our customers, our future sales
are not guaranteed.
We generally do not have long-term contracts with our customers and existing
contracts may be cancelled. As a result, our agreements with our customers do
not provide any assurance of future sales. Accordingly our customers are not
required to make minimum purchases and may cease purchasing our products at any
time without penalty. Because our customers are free to purchase products from
our competitors, we are exposed to competitive price pressure on each order. Any
reductions, cancellations or deferrals in customer orders could have a negative
impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
40
Our new distributed controls architecture may not achieve customer acceptance.
We began to sell to customers our new distributed controls architecture based on
IEEE 1394 FireWire technology in fiscal 2002. IEEE 1394 is a standard defining a
high speed multimedia connection protocol that enables simple, low cost,
high-bandwidth, real-time data interfacing between computers and intelligent
devices. We are devoting, and expect to devote in the future significant
financial, engineering and management resources to expand our development,
marketing and sales of these products. Commercial success of these products
depends upon our ability to, among other things:
o accurately determine the features and functionality that our
controls customers require or prefer;
o successfully design and implement intelligent automation solutions
that include these features and functionality, including integrating
this architecture with a variety of robots manufactured by other
companies;
o enter into agreements with system integrators, manufacturers and
distributors; and
o achieve market acceptance for our design and approach.
Our distributed controls strategy may not achieve broad market acceptance for a
variety of reasons including:
o companies who use machine controls may continue to use their current
design and may not adopt our distributed architecture;
o companies may decide to adopt a different technology than IEEE 1394
FireWire for their distributed controls;
o companies may determine that the costs and resources required to
switch to our distributed architecture are unacceptable to them;
o system integrators, manufacturers, and OEMs may not enter into
agreements with us; and
o competition from traditional, well-established controls solutions.
If we do not achieve market acceptance of these products, our business and
operating results will suffer.
Some of our solution products require us to commit contractually to a firm price
which makes us vulnerable to cost overruns.
We contractually commit to a firm price over a number of units for certain of
our solutions products, including the products that we have added as a result of
our acquisitions. Our ability to achieve a reasonably accurate estimate of the
costs of these products will have a direct impact on the profit we obtain from
these products. If the costs we incur in completing a customer order for these
products exceed our expectations, we generally cannot pass those costs on to our
customer.
Our gross margins can vary significantly from quarter to quarter based on
factors which are not always in our control.
Our operating results fluctuate when our gross margins vary. Our gross margins
vary for a number of reasons, including:
o the mix of products we sell;
o the average selling prices of products we sell including changes in
the average discounts offered;
o the costs to manufacture, service and support our new products and
enhancements;
o the costs to customize our systems;
o the volume of products produced;
o our efforts to enter new markets; and
o certain inventory related costs including obsolescence of products
and components resulting in excess inventory.
Because our significant fixed costs are not easily reduced, we may be unable to
adequately reduce expenditures to offset decreases in revenue to avoid operating
losses.
41
While we have reduced our absolute amount of expenses in all areas of our
operations in connection with our restructuring, we continue to invest in
research and development, capital equipment and extensive ongoing customer
service and support capability worldwide. These investments create significant
fixed costs that we may be unable to reduce rapidly if we do not meet our sales
goals. Moreover, if we fail to obtain a significant volume of customer orders
for an extended period of time, we may have difficulty planning our future
production and inventory levels, utilizing our relatively fixed capacity, which
could also cause fluctuations in our operating results.
We cannot control the procurement, sales or marketing efforts of the systems
integrators and OEMs who sell our products which may result in lower revenues if
they do not successfully market and sell our products or choose instead to
promote competing products.
We believe that our ability to sell products to system integrators and OEMs will
continue to be important to our success. Our relationships with system
integrators and OEMs are generally not exclusive, and some of our system
integrators and OEMs may expend a significant amount of effort or give higher
priority to selling products of our competitors. In the future, any of our
system integrators or our OEMs may discontinue their relationships with us or
form additional competing arrangements with our competitors. The loss of, or a
significant reduction in revenues from, system integrators or OEMs to which we
sell a significant amount of our product could negatively impact our business,
financial condition or results of operations.
As we enter new geographic and applications markets, we must locate and
establish relationships with system integrators and OEMs to assist us in
building sales in those markets. It can take an extended period of time and
significant resources to establish a profitable relationship with a system
integrator or OEM because of product integration expenses, training in product
and technologies and sales training. We may not be successful in obtaining
effective new system integrators or OEMs or in maintaining sales relationships
with them. In the event a number of our system integrators and/or OEMs
experience financial problems, terminate their relationships with us or
substantially reduce the amount of our products they sell, or in the event we
fail to build or maintain an effective systems integrator or OEM channel in any
existing or new markets, our business, financial condition and results of
operations could be adversely affected.
In addition, a substantial portion of our sales is to system integrators that
specialize in designing and building production lines for manufacturers. Many of
these companies are small operations with limited financial resources, and we
have from time to time experienced difficulty in collecting payments from
certain of these companies. As a result, we perform ongoing credit evaluations
of our customers. To the extent we are unable to mitigate this risk of
collections from system integrators, our results of operations may be harmed. In
addition, due to their limited financial resources, during extended market
downturns, the viability of some system integrators may be in question, which
would also result in a reduction in our revenues.
The long sales cycles and implementation periods of our products may increase
costs of obtaining orders and reduce predictability of our earnings.
Our products are technologically complex. Prospective customers generally must
commit significant resources to test and evaluate our products and to install
and integrate them into larger systems. Orders expected in one quarter may shift
to another quarter or be cancelled with little advance notice as a result of the
customers' budgetary constraints, internal acceptance reviews, and other factors
affecting the timing of customers' purchase decisions. In addition, customers
often require a significant number of product presentations and demonstrations,
in some instances evaluating equipment on site, before reaching a sufficient
level of confidence in the product's performance and compatibility with the
customer's requirements to place an order. As a result, our sales process is
often subject to delays associated with lengthy approval processes that
typically accompany the design and testing of new products. The sales cycles of
our products often last for many months or even years. In addition, the time
required for our customers to incorporate our products into their systems can
vary significantly with the needs of our customers and generally exceeds several
months, which further complicates our planning processes and reduces the
predictability of our operating results. Longer sales cycles require us to
invest significant resources in attempting to make sales, which may not be
realized in the near term and therefore may delay or prevent the generation of
revenue. In addition, should our financial condition deteriorate further,
prospective customers may be reluctant to purchase our products which would have
an adverse effect on our revenues.
42
We may not be able to effectively implement our restructuring activities, may
need to implement further restructuring activities and our restructuring may
negatively impact our business.
The intelligent automation industry is highly competitive and currently
experiencing reduced demand. We have responded to increased competition and
changes in the industry in which we compete by restructuring our operations and
reducing the size of our workforce while attempting to maintain our market
presence in the face of increased competition. Despite our efforts to structure
Adept and its businesses to meet competitive pressures and customer needs, we
cannot assure you that we will be successful in implementing these restructuring
activities or that the reductions in workforce will not harm our business
operations and prospects. Our inability to structure our operations based on
current market conditions could negatively impact our business. We also cannot
assure you that we will not be required to implement further restructuring
activities, make additions or other changes to our management. or reductions in
workforce based on changes in the markets and industry in which we compete. We
cannot assure you that any future restructuring efforts will be successful.
Our reliance on single source suppliers with lengthy lead procurement times or
limited supplies for our key components and materials may render us unable to
meet product demand and we may lose customers and suffer decreased revenue.
We obtain many key components and materials and some significant mechanical
subsystems from sole or single source suppliers with whom we have no guaranteed
supply arrangements. In addition, some of our sole or single sourced components
and mechanical subsystems incorporated into our products have long procurement
lead times. Our reliance on sole or single source suppliers involves certain
significant risks including:
o loss of control over the manufacturing process;
o potential absence of adequate supplier capacity;
o potential inability to obtain an adequate supply of required
components, materials or mechanical subsystems; and
o reduced control over manufacturing yields, costs, timely delivery,
reliability and quality of components, materials and mechanical
subsystems.
We depend on Flash Corporation for the supply of our circuit boards, Wilco
Corporation for the supply of our cables, NSK Corporation for the supply of our
linear modules, which are mechanical devices powered by an electric motor that
move in a straight line, and which can be combined as building blocks to form
simple robotic systems, Yaskawa Electric Corp. for the supply of our 6-axis
robots, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. for the supply of semiconductor robots,
Hirata Corporation for the supply of our Adept Cobra 600 robot mechanism and
Adept Cobra 800 robot mechanisms and Matrox Electronic Systems Ltd. for the
supply of our computer vision processors, which are used to digitize images from
a camera and perform measurements and analysis. We do not have contracts with
certain of these suppliers. If any one of these significant sole or single
source suppliers were unable or unwilling to manufacture the components,
materials or mechanical subsystems we need in the volumes we require, we would
have to identify and qualify acceptable replacements. The process of qualifying
suppliers may be lengthy, and additional sources may not be available to us on a
timely basis, on acceptable terms or at all. If sufficient quantities of these
items were not available from our existing suppliers and a relationship with an
alternative vendor could not be developed in a timely manner, shipments of our
products could be interrupted and reengineering of these products could be
required. In the past, we have experienced quality control or specification
problems with certain key components provided by sole source suppliers, and have
had to design around the particular flawed item. In addition, some of the
components that we use in our products are in short supply. We have also
experienced delays in filling customer orders due to the failure of certain
suppliers to meet our volume and schedule requirements. Some of our suppliers
have also ceased manufacturing components that we require for our products, and
we have been required to purchase sufficient supplies for the estimated life of
its product line. Problems of this nature with our suppliers may occur in the
future. In addition, some of our suppliers currently require accelerated payment
terms. Should our financial condition deteriorate further, it is highly likely
that additional primary suppliers may request cash in advance or at a minimum be
reluctant to continue with existing terms where those terms extend beyond
customary industry averages.
Disruption or termination of our supply sources could require us to seek
alternative sources of supply, and could delay our product shipments and damage
relationships with current and prospective customers, any of which could have a
43
material adverse effect on our business. If we incorrectly forecast product mix
for a particular period and we are unable to obtain sufficient supplies of any
components or mechanical subsystems on a timely basis due to long procurement
lead times, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be
substantially impaired. Moreover, if demand for a product for which we have
purchased a substantial amount of components fails to meet our expectations, we
would be required to write off the excess inventory. A prolonged inability to
obtain adequate timely deliveries of key components could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If we cannot identify and make acquisitions, our ability to expand our
operations and increase our revenue may be impaired.
In the latter half of fiscal 2000, a significant portion of our growth was
attributable to acquisitions of other businesses and technologies. In October
2001, we acquired CHAD Industries, Inc., and in the first quarter of fiscal
2003, we acquired control of Meta Control Technologies, Inc. We expect that
acquisitions of complementary companies, businesses, products and technologies
in the future may play an important role in our ability to expand our operations
and increase our revenue. We continue to review acquisition candidates as part
of our strategy to market intelligent automation solutions targeted at the
precision assembly industry. Our ability to make acquisitions is rendered more
difficult due to our cash constraints and the decline of our common stock price,
making equity consideration more expensive. If we are unable to identify
suitable targets for acquisition or complete acquisitions on acceptable terms,
our ability to expand our product and/or service offerings and increase our
revenue may be impaired. Even if we are able to identify and acquire acquisition
candidates, we may be unable to realize the benefits anticipated as a result of
these acquisitions.
Any acquisition we have made or may make in the future could disrupt our
business, increase our expenses and adversely affect our financial condition or
operations.
During fiscal 2000, we acquired Pensar, NanoMotion and BYE/Oasis. In July 2000,
we acquired HexaVision. In October 2001, we acquired CHAD Industries and, in the
first quarter of fiscal 2003, we acquired control of Meta Control Technologies,
Inc. These acquisitions introduced us to industries and technologies in which we
have limited previous experience. In the future we may make acquisitions of, or
investments in, other businesses that offer products, services, and technologies
that management believes will further our strategic objectives. We cannot be
certain that we would successfully integrate any businesses, technologies or
personnel that we might acquire, and any acquisitions might divert our
management's attention away from our core business. Any future acquisitions or
investments we might make would present risks commonly associated with these
types of transactions, including:
o difficulty in combining the product offerings, operations, or work
force of an acquired business;
o potential loss of key personnel of an acquired business;
o adverse effects on existing relationships with suppliers and
customers;
o disruptions of our on-going businesses;
o difficulties in realizing our potential financial and strategic
objectives through the successful integration of the acquired
business;
o difficulty in maintaining uniform standards, controls, procedures
and policies;
o potential negative impact on results of operations due to
amortization of goodwill, other intangible assets acquired or
assumption of anticipated liabilities;
o risks associated with entering markets in which we have limited
previous experience;
o potential negative impact of unanticipated liabilities or
litigation; and
o the diversion of management attention.
The risks described above, either individually or in the aggregate, could
significantly harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We expect that future acquisitions, if any, could provide for consideration to
be paid in cash, shares of our common stock, or a combination of cash and common
stock. In addition, we may issue additional equity in connection with future
acquisitions, which could result in dilution of our shareholders' equity
interest. Fluctuations in our stock price may make acquisitions more expensive
or prevent us from being able to complete acquisitions on terms that are
acceptable to us.
44
Our international operations and sales subject us to divergent regulatory
requirements and other financial and operating risks outside of our control that
may harm our operating results.
International sales were $17.1 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003,
$31.8 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002, and $36.4 million for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2001. This represented 38.2%, 55.7%, and 36.3% of net
revenues for the respective periods. We also purchase some components and
mechanical subsystems from foreign suppliers. As a result, our operating results
are subject to the risks inherent in international sales and purchases, which
include the following:
o unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;
o political, military and economic changes and disruptions;
o transportation costs and delays;
o foreign currency fluctuations;
o export/import controls;
o tariff regulations and other trade barriers;
o higher freight rates;
o difficulties in staffing and managing foreign sales operations;
o greater difficulty in accounts receivable collection in foreign
jurisdictions; and
o potentially adverse tax consequences.
Foreign exchange fluctuations may render our products less competitive relative
to locally manufactured product offerings, or could result in foreign exchange
losses. To maintain a competitive price for our products in Europe, we may have
to provide discounts or otherwise effectively reduce our prices, resulting in a
lower margin on products sold in Europe. Continued change in the values of
European currencies or changes in the values of other foreign currencies could
have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
We sell standard components for products to OEMs, who deliver products to Asian
markets, such as Japan, Malaysia, Korea and China.
Past turmoil in Asian financial markets and the deterioration of underlying
economic conditions in certain Asian countries may continue to impact our sales
to our OEM customers who deliver to, are located in, or whose projects are based
in, Asian countries due to the impact of restrictions on government spending
imposed by the International Monetary Fund on those countries receiving the
IMF's assistance. In addition, customers in those countries may face reduced
access to working capital to fund component purchases, such as our products, due
to higher interest rates, reduced bank lending due to contractions in the money
supply or the deterioration in the customer's or our bank's financial condition
or the inability to access local equity financing. In the past, as a result of
this lack of working capital and higher interest rates, we have experienced a
significant decline in sales to OEMs serving the Asian market.
Maintaining operations in different countries requires us to expend significant
resources to keep our operations coordinated and subjects us to differing laws
and regulatory regimes that may affect our offerings and revenue.
We may incur currency exchange-related losses in connection with our reliance on
our single or sole source foreign suppliers.
We make yen-denominated purchases of certain components and mechanical
subsystems from certain of our sole or single source Japanese suppliers. We
remain subject to the transaction exposures that arise from foreign exchange
movements between the dates foreign currency export sales or purchase
transactions are recorded and the dates cash is received or payments are made in
foreign currencies. We experienced losses on instruments that hedge our foreign
currency exposure in fiscal 2002 and the first three quarters of fiscal 2003. In
March 2003, we suspended our foreign currency hedging program because we
determined that our international activities held or conducted in foreign
currency did not warrant the cost associated with a hedging program due to
decreased exposure of foreign currency exchange risk on international
operational assets and liabilities. Our current or any future currency exchange
strategy may not be successful in avoiding exchange-related losses. Any
exchange-related losses or exposure may negatively affect our business,
financial condition or results of operations.
45
If our hardware products do not comply with standards set forth by the European
Union, we will not be able to sell them in Europe.
Our hardware products are required to comply with European Union Low Voltage,
Electro-Magnetic Compatibility, and Machinery Safety Directives. The European
Union mandates that our products carry the CE mark denoting that these products
are manufactured in strict accordance to design guidelines in support of these
directives. These guidelines are subject to change and to varying
interpretation. New guidelines impacting machinery design go into effect each
year. To date, we have retained TUV Rheinland to help certify that our
controller-based products, including some of our robots, meet applicable
European Union directives and guidelines. Although our existing certified
products meet the requirements of the applicable European Union directives, we
cannot provide any assurance that future products can be designed, within market
window constraints, to meet the future requirements. If any of our robot
products or any other major hardware products do not meet the requirements of
the European Union directives, we would be unable to legally sell these products
in Europe. Thus, our business, financial condition and results of operations
could be harmed. Such directives and guidelines could change in the future,
forcing us to redesign or withdraw from the market one or more of our existing
products that may have been originally approved for sale.
Our hardware and software products may contain defects that could increase our
expenses and exposure to liabilities and or harm our reputation and future
business prospects.
Our hardware and software products are complex and, despite extensive testing,
our new or existing products or enhancements may contain defects, errors or
performance problems when first introduced, when new versions or enhancements
are released or even after these products or enhancements have been used in the
marketplace for a period of time. We may discover product defects only after a
product has been installed and used by customers. We may discover defects,
errors or performance problems in future shipments of our products. These
problems could result in expensive and time consuming design modifications or
large warranty charges, expose us to liability for damages, damage customer
relationships and result in loss of market share, any of which could harm our
reputation and future business prospects. In addition, increased development and
warranty costs could reduce our operating profits and could result in losses.
The existence of any defects, errors or failures in our products could also lead
to product liability claims or lawsuits against us, our channel partners or
against our customers. A successful product liability claim could result in
substantial cost and divert management's attention and resources, which could
have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of
operations. Although we are not aware of any product liability claims to date,
the sale and support of our products entail the risk of these claims.
If we become subject to unfair hiring claims, we could be prevented from hiring
needed personnel, incur liability for damages and incur substantial costs in
defending ourselves.
Companies in our industry whose employees accept positions with competitors
frequently claim that these competitors have engaged in unfair hiring practices
or that the employment of these persons would involve the disclosure or use of
trade secrets. These claims could prevent us from hiring personnel or cause us
to incur liability for damages. We could also incur substantial costs in
defending ourselves or our employees against these claims, regardless of their
merits. Defending ourselves from these claims could divert the attention of our
management away from our operations.
Our failure to protect our intellectual property and proprietary technology may
significantly impair our competitive advantage.
Our success and ability to compete depend in large part upon protecting our
proprietary technology. We rely on a combination of patent, trademark and trade
secret protection and nondisclosure agreements to protect our proprietary
rights. The steps we have taken may not be sufficient to prevent the
misappropriation of our intellectual property, particularly in foreign countries
where the laws may not protect our proprietary rights as fully as in the United
States. The patent and trademark law and trade secret protection may not be
adequate to deter third party infringement or misappropriation of our patents,
trademarks and similar proprietary rights. In addition, patents issued to Adept
46
may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented. Our rights granted under those
patents may not provide competitive advantages to us, and the claims under our
patent applications may not be allowed. We may be subject to or may initiate
interference proceedings in the United States Patent and Trademark Office, which
can demand significant financial and management resources. The process of
seeking patent protection can be time consuming and expensive and patents may
not be issued from currently pending or future applications. Moreover, our
existing patents or any new patents that may be issued may not be sufficient in
scope or strength to provide meaningful protection or any commercial advantage
to us.
We may in the future initiate claims or litigation against third parties for
infringement of our proprietary rights in order to determine the scope and
validity of our proprietary rights or the proprietary rights of our competitors.
These claims could result in costly litigation and the diversion of our
technical and management personnel.
We may face costly intellectual property infringement claims.
We have from time to time received communications from third parties asserting
that we are infringing certain patents and other intellectual property rights of
others or seeking indemnification against such alleged infringement. For
example, some end users of our products have notified us that they have received
a claim of patent infringement from the Jerome H. Lemelson Foundation, alleging
that their use of our machine vision products infringes certain patents issued
to Mr. Lemelson. In addition, we have been notified that other end users of our
AdeptVision VME line and the predecessor line of Multibus machine vision
products have received letters from the Lemelson Foundation which refer to Mr.
Lemelson's patent portfolio and offer the end user a license to the particular
patents. As claims arise, we evaluate their merits. Any claims of infringement
brought by third parties could result in protracted and costly litigation,
damages for infringement, and the necessity of obtaining a license relating to
one or more of our products or current or future technologies, which may not be
available on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Litigation, which could
result in substantial cost to us and diversion of our resources, may be
necessary to enforce our patents or other intellectual property rights or to
defend us against claimed infringement of the rights of others. Any intellectual
property litigation and the failure to obtain necessary licenses or other rights
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations. Some of our end users have notified us that they may seek
indemnification from us for damages or expenses resulting from any claims made
by the Jerome H. Lemelson Foundation. We cannot predict the outcome of this or
any similar litigation which may arise in the future. Litigation of this kind
may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or
results of operations.
Our future success depends on our continuing ability to attract, retain and
motivate highly-qualified managerial and technical personnel.
Competition for qualified personnel in the intelligent automation industry is
intense. Our inability to recruit, train and motivate qualified management and
technical personnel on a timely basis would adversely affect our ability to
manage our operations, and design, manufacture, market and support our products.
Risks Related to Our Industry
Intense competition in the market for intelligent automation products will cause
our revenues and business to suffer if our products are not seen as more
attractive by customers than other products in the marketplace.
The market for intelligent automation products is highly competitive. We believe
that the principal competitive factors affecting the market for our products
are:
o product functionality and reliability;
o price;
o customer service;
o delivery; including timeliness, predictability and reliability of
delivery commitment dates; and
o product features such as flexibility, programmability and ease of
use.
We compete with a number of robot companies, motion control companies, machine
vision companies and simulation software companies. Many of our competitors have
substantially greater financial, technical and marketing resources than us. In
addition, we may in the future face competition from new entrants in one or more
of our markets.
47
Many of our competitors in the robot market are integrated manufacturers of
products that produce robotics equipment internally for their own use and may
also compete with our products for sales to other customers. Some of these large
manufacturing companies have greater flexibility in pricing because they
generate substantial unit volumes of robots for internal demand and may have
access through their parent companies to large amounts of capital. Any of our
competitors may seek to expand their presence in other markets in which we
compete.
Our current or potential competitors may develop products comparable or superior
in terms of price and performance features to those developed by us or adapt
more quickly than we can to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer
requirements. We may be required to make substantial additional investments in
connection with our research, development, engineering, marketing and customer
service efforts in order to meet any competitive threat, so that we will be able
to compete successfully in the future. We expect that in the event the
intelligent automation market expands, competition in the industry will
intensify, as additional competitors enter our markets and current competitors
expand their product lines. Increased competitive pressure could result in a
loss of sales or market share, or cause us to lower prices for our products, any
of which could harm our business.
If we are unable to effectively support the distinct needs of the multiple
industries of our customers, the demand for our products may decrease and our
revenues will decline.
We market products for the food, communications, electronics, automotive,
appliance, semiconductor, and life sciences industries. Because we operate in
multiple industries, we must work constantly to understand the needs, standards
and technical requirements of numerous different industries and must devote
significant resources to developing different products for these industries. Our
results of operations are also subject to the cyclicality and downturns in these
markets. Product development is costly and time consuming. Many of our products
are used by our customers to develop, manufacture and test their own products.
As a result, we must anticipate trends in our customers' industries and develop
products before our customers' products are commercialized. If we do not
accurately predict our customers' needs and future activities, we may invest
substantial resources in developing products that do not achieve broad market
acceptance. Our decision to continue to offer products to a given market or to
penetrate new markets is based in part on our judgment of the size, growth rate
and other factors that contribute to the attractiveness of a particular market.
If our product offerings in any particular market are not competitive or our
analyses of a market are incorrect, our business and results of operations could
be harmed.
Our business will decline if we cannot keep up with the rapid pace of
technological change and new product development that characterize the
intelligent automation industry.
The intelligent automation industry is characterized by rapid technological
change and new product introductions and enhancements. Our ability to remain
competitive depends greatly upon the technological quality of our products and
processes compared to those of our competitors and our ability both to continue
to develop new and enhanced products and to introduce those products at
competitive prices and on a timely and cost-effective basis. We may not be
successful in selecting, developing and manufacturing new products or in
enhancing our existing products on a timely basis or at all. Our new or enhanced
products may not achieve market acceptance. Our failure to successfully select,
develop and manufacture new products, or to timely enhance existing technologies
and meet customers' technical specifications for any new products or
enhancements on a timely basis, or to successfully market new products, could
harm our business. If we cannot successfully develop and manufacture new
products or meet specifications, our products could lose market share, our
revenues and profits could decline, or we could experience operating losses. New
technology or product introductions by our competitors could also cause a
decline in sales or loss of market acceptance for our existing products or force
us to significantly reduce the prices of our existing products.
From time to time we have experienced delays in the introduction of, and certain
technical and manufacturing difficulties with, some of our products, and we may
experience technical and manufacturing difficulties and delays in future
introductions of new products and enhancements. Our failure to develop,
manufacture and sell new products in quantities sufficient to offset a decline
in revenues from existing products or to successfully manage product and related
inventory transitions could harm our business.
48
Our success in developing, introducing, selling and supporting new and enhanced
products depends upon a variety of factors, including timely and efficient
completion of hardware and software design and development, implementation of
manufacturing processes and effective sales, marketing and customer service.
Because of the complexity of our products, significant delays may occur between
a product's initial introduction and commencement of volume production.
The development and commercialization of new products involve many difficulties,
including:
o the identification of new product opportunities;
o the retention and hiring of appropriate research and development
personnel;
o the determination of the product's technical specifications;
o the successful completion of the development process;
o the successful marketing of the product and the risk of having
customers embrace new technological advances; and
o additional customer service costs associated with supporting new
product introductions and/or effecting subsequent potential field
upgrades.
The development of new products may not be completed in a timely manner, and
these products may not achieve acceptance in the market. The development of new
products has required, and will require, that we expend significant financial
and management resources. If we are unable to continue to successfully develop
new products in response to customer requirements or technological changes, our
business may be harmed.
If we fail to adequately invest in research and development, we may be unable to
compete effectively and sales of our products will decline.
Over the past year, our total expenditures for research and development have
declined. We have limited resources to allocate to research and development and
must allocate our resources among a wide variety of projects. Because of intense
competition in our industry, the cost of failing to invest in strategic products
is high. If we fail to adequately invest in research and development, we may be
unable to compete effectively in the intelligent automation markets in which we
operate.
We may not receive significant revenues from our current research and
development efforts for several years, if at all.
Internally developing intelligent automation products is expensive, and these
investments often require a long time to generate returns. Our strategy involves
significant investments in research and development and related product
opportunities. Although our total expenditures for research and development have
declined, we continue to believe that we must continue to dedicate a significant
amount of resources to our research and development efforts to maintain our
competitive position. However, we cannot predict that we will receive
significant revenues from these investments, if at all.
If we do not comply with environmental regulations, we may incur significant
costs causing our overall business to suffer.
We are subject to a variety of environmental regulations relating to the use,
storage, handling, and disposal of certain hazardous substances used in the
manufacturing and assembly of our products. We believe that we are currently in
compliance with all material environmental regulations in connection with our
manufacturing operations, and that we have obtained all necessary environmental
permits to conduct our business. However, our failure to comply with present or
future regulations could subject us to a variety of consequences that could harm
our business, including:
o the imposition of substantial fines;
o suspension of production; and
o alteration of manufacturing processes or cessation of operations.
49
Compliance with environmental regulations could require us to acquire expensive
remediation equipment or to incur substantial expenses. Our failure to control
the use, disposal, removal, storage, or to adequately restrict the discharge of,
or assist in the cleanup of, hazardous or toxic substances, could subject us to
significant liabilities, including joint and several liability under certain
statutes. The imposition of liabilities of this kind could harm our financial
condition.
If we fail to obtain export licenses, we would be unable to sell any of our
software products overseas and our revenues would decline.
We must comply with U.S. Department of Commerce regulations in shipping our
software products and other technologies outside the United States. Any
significant future difficulty in complying could harm our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Proposed regulations related to equity compensation could adversely affect our
results of operation
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), among other agencies and
entities, is currently considering changes to generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States that, if implemented, would require us to record
a charge to compensation expense for option grants. As currently permitted by
SFAS No. 123, we apply Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees", (APB 25) and related interpretations in
accounting for its stock option plans and stock purchase plan. Accordingly, we
do not recognized compensation cost for stock options granted at fair market
value. We cannot predict whether the proposed regulations will be adopted, but
if adopted these regulations would have an adverse affect on our results of
operations.
Our business is subject to the risk of earthquakes and other natural
catastrophic events.
Our corporate headquarters and principal offices, including certain of our
research and development operations and distribution facilities, are located in
the San Francisco Bay area of Northern California, which is a region known to
experience seismic activity, flood plains and other natural phenomenon not
within our control. If significant seismic activity or other natural
catastrophes affecting this region were to occur, our operations may be
interrupted, which would adversely impact our business and results of
operations.
Acts of war or terrorism could adversely and materially affect our business.
Terrorist acts or military engagement anywhere in the world could cause damage
or disruption to us, our customers, OEMs, distributors or suppliers, or could
create political or economic instability, any of which could adversely effect
our business, financial condition or results of operations. Furthermore, we are
uninsured for losses or interruptions caused by acts of war or terrorism.
Risks Related to our Stock
Our common stock has been delisted from the Nasdaq Stock Market and trades on
the OTC Bulletin Board. The delisting of our common stock may negatively impact
the trading activity and price of our common stock and could make it more
difficult for us to generate additional financing.
During fiscal 2003, we received notification from Nasdaq indicating that our
securities were subject to delisting from the Nasdaq National Market as a result
of our failure to comply with certain quantitative requirements for continued
listing on the Nasdaq National Market and denying our application to transfer
the listing of our securities to the Nasdaq SmallCap Market. Our appeal of the
delisting was denied after a hearing of the matter and our stock was delisted
effective April 15, 2003. The Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Panel based its
decision on our inability to meet the requirements for continued listing on
Nasdaq. Our common stock commenced trading on the OTC Bulletin Board on April
15, 2003. The OTC Bulletin Board is generally considered less liquid and
efficient than Nasdaq, and although trading in our stock was relatively thin and
sporadic before the delisting, the liquidity of our common stock has declined
and price volatility increased because smaller quantities of shares are bought
and sold, transactions could be delayed and securities analysts' and news media
coverage of Adept will likely diminish. These factors could result in lower
prices and larger spreads in the bid and ask prices for our common stock.
Reduced liquidity may reduce the value of our common stock and our ability to
generate additional funding or otherwise use our equity as consideration for an
50
acquisition or other corporate opportunity. The delisting could result in a
number of other negative implications, including the potential loss of
confidence by suppliers, customers and employees, the loss of institutional
investor interest and the availability of fewer business development, other
strategic opportunities and additional cost of compensating our employees using
cash and equity compensation.
Our existing outstanding preferred stock, as well as the ability of our Board of
Directors to issue additional preferred stock could delay or impede a change of
control of our company and may adversely affect the price an acquirer is willing
to pay for our common stock.
We have issued 100,000 shares of our convertible preferred stock for
consideration of $25.0 million with a liquidation preference of $25.0 million
that may be triggered by events such as a change of control of our common stock
or liquidation. The preferred stock may be converted into shares of Adept's
common stock at the per share rate equal to the initial preferred price, $250,
divided by the lower of $8.18 or 75% of the price of Adept's stock on the
conversion date, provided that the denominator in such conversion rate will not
be lower than $4.09 for the Series B preferred stock and $2.05 for the Series A
preferred stock, other than for certain liquidity events not approved by the
Board of Directors. The preferred stock shall not be convertible into 20% or
more of the outstanding voting securities of Adept and no holder of preferred
stock may convert shares of preferred stock if, after the conversion, the holder
will hold 20% or more of our outstanding voting securities. As a result, as the
number of outstanding shares of Adept increases (including upon exercise of
options, warrants or conversion of convertible notes), the number of shares into
which the preferred stock may be convertible proportionately increases or the
preferred stockholder reduces the shares of voting stock it owns. Shares not
permitted to be converted remain outstanding and become convertible when such
holder holds less than 20% of Adept's outstanding voting securities. The
liquidation preference of the preferred stock or the ability of a preferred
shareholder to convert shares of preferred stock into common stock may affect
the price an acquirer or investor is willing to pay for our common stock and the
trading price of our common stock.
The Board of Directors has the authority to issue, without further action by the
shareholders, up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series
and to fix the price, rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions thereof,
including dividend rights, dividend rates, conversion rights, voting rights,
terms of redemption, redemption prices, liquidation preferences and the number
of shares constituting a series or the designation of such series, without any
further vote or action by Adept's shareholders. The issuance of preferred stock,
while providing desirable flexibility in connection with possible acquisitions,
financings and other corporate purposes, could have the effect of delaying,
deferring or preventing a change in control of Adept without further action by
the shareholders and may adversely affect the market price of, and the voting
and other rights of, the holders of common stock. Additionally, the conversion
of preferred stock into common stock may have a dilutive effect on the holders
of common stock.
Our stock price has fluctuated and may continue to fluctuate widely.
The market price of our common stock has fluctuated substantially in the past.
During fiscal 2003, our stock price ranged from a low of $0.14 to a high of
$2.50. The market price of our common stock will continue to be subject to
significant fluctuations in the future in response to a variety of factors,
including:
o the business environment, including the operating results and stock
prices of companies in the industries we serve;
o our liquidity needs and constraints;
o the delisting of our common stock from the Nasdaq Stock Market and
trading on the OTC Bulletin Board;
o fluctuations in operating results;
o future announcements concerning our business or that of our
competitors or customers;
o the introduction of new products or changes in product pricing
policies by us or our competitors;
o litigation regarding proprietary rights or other matters;
o change in analysts' earnings estimates;
o developments in the financial markets;
o general conditions in the intelligent automation industry; and
o perceived dilution from stock issuances for acquisitions, our
convertible preferred stock and convertible note and other
transactions.
51
Furthermore, stock prices for many companies, and high technology companies in
particular, fluctuate widely for reasons that may be unrelated to their
operating results. Those fluctuations and general economic, political and market
conditions, such as recessions, terrorist or other military actions, or
international currency fluctuations, as well as public perception of equity
values of publicly-traded companies may adversely affect the market price of our
common stock.
We may be subject to securities class action litigation if our stock price
remains volatile, which could result in substantial costs, distract management
and damage our reputation.
In the past, securities class action litigation has often been brought against
companies following periods of volatility in the market price of their
securities. Companies, like us, that are involved in rapidly changing technology
markets are particularly subject to this risk. We may be the target of
litigation of this kind in the future. Any securities litigation could result in
substantial costs, divert management's attention and resources from our
operations and negatively affect our public image and reputation.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to
our investment portfolio. We maintain an investment policy, which seeks to
ensure the safety and preservation of our invested funds by limiting default
risk, market risk and reinvestment risk. The table below presents principal cash
flow amounts and related weighted-average interest rates by year of maturity for
our investment portfolio.
Fiscal Fair
(in thousands) 2003 Value
-------------- ---- -----
Cash equivalents
Fixed rate........................ $ 3,234 $ 3,234
Average rate...................... 0.03%
Total Investment Securities.... $ 3,234 $ 3,234
------------- -------------
Average rate...................... 0.03%
We mitigate default risk by investing in high credit quality securities and by
positioning our portfolio to respond appropriately to a significant reduction in
a credit rating of any investment issuer of guarantor. Our portfolio includes
only marketable securities with active secondary or resale markets to ensure
portfolio liquidity and contains a prudent amount of diversification. We conduct
business on a global basis. Consequently, we are exposed to adverse or
beneficial movements in foreign currency exchange rates.
In the past, we have previously used a foreign currency-hedging program to hedge
our exposure to foreign currency exchange risk on local international
operational assets and liabilities. We entered into foreign currency forward
contracts to minimize the impact of exchange rate fluctuations on certain
foreign currency commitments and balance sheet positions. In March 2003, we
determined that our international activities held or conducted in foreign
currency did not warrant the cost associated with a hedging program due to
decreased exposure of foreign currency exchange risk on international
operational assets and liabilities. As a result, we suspended our foreign
currency hedging program in March 2003.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules as of June
30, 2003 and 2002 and for each of the three years in the period ended June 30,
2003 are included in Items 15(a)(1) and (2) included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Supplementary Financial Data is included under Item 6 in this Form 10-K.
52
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of the end of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003, Adept carried out an
evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of members of our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
of the effectiveness of the design and operation of Adept's disclosure controls
and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer have concluded that Adept's disclosure controls and procedures
are effective in alerting them in a timely manner to material information
relating to Adept (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be
included in Adept's periodic SEC filings. It should be noted that the design of
any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the
likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will
succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions,
regardless of how remote.
During the most recent fiscal quarter, there has not occurred any change in
Adept's internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Adept's internal control over
financial reporting.
53
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The information required by this item concerning our directors is incorporated
by reference from the section captioned "Election of Directors" contained in our
Proxy Statement related to the 2003 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed
by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the end of
our fiscal year pursuant to General Instruction G(3) of Form 10-K, referred to
as the Proxy Statement. The information required by this item concerning
executive officers is set forth in Part I of this Report. The information
required by this item concerning compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange
Act is incorporated by reference from the section captioned "Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" contained in the Proxy Statement.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the
section captioned "Executive Compensation and Other Matters" contained in the
Proxy Statement.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the
section captioned "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management" contained in the Proxy Statement.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the
sections captioned "Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation"
and "Certain Transactions" contained in the Proxy Statement.
54
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.
(a)(1) Financial Statements
The financial statements (including the Notes thereto listed in the Index to
Consolidated Financial Statements (set forth in Item 8 of Part II of this Form
10-K) are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules
The following financial statement schedule is included herein:
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts. Additional schedules are not
required under the related schedule instructions or are inapplicable, and
therefore have been omitted.
(a)(3) Exhibits
2.1 Share Purchase Agreement among Marc Tremblay, Alain
Rivard, Eric St-Pierre, Pierre Boivin, 9044-0108 Quebec
Inc., Societe Innovatech Quebec et Chaudiere-Appalaches,
Sofinov, Societe Financiere d'Innovation Inc., Business
Development Bank of Canada, Christian Labbe, Patrick
Murphy and certain other shareholders named therein,
Adept Technology Canada Holding Co., and Registrant,
dated July 21, 2000 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form
8-K/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on October 25, 2000).+
3.1 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the
Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S- 1
(No. 33-98816) (the "1995 Form S-1")).
3.2 Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation of
the Registrant filed with the Secretary of State of
California on November 17, 2000 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-48638)).
3.3 Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended to date
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the
Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter ended December 28, 2002) (the "2003
Second Quarter 10-Q")).
3.4 Statement of Preferences of Series A and Series B
Preferred Stock (incorporated by references to Exhibit
3.1 to the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter
ended September 29, 2001 (the "2002 First Quarter
10-Q")).
4.1 Form of Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 to the 1995 Form S-1).
4.2 Securities Purchase and Investor Rights Agreement, dated
October 22, 2001, between the Registrant and JDS
Uniphase Corporation (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant's 2002 First Quarter
10-Q). 4.3 10.1 * 1993 Stock Plan as amended, and form
of agreement thereto (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant's Registration Statement
on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on November 20, 2000, No. 333-50292).
10.1* 1993 Stock Plan as amended, and form of agreement
thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November
20, 2000, No. 333-50292).
10.2* 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan as amended, and form
of agreements thereto (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter ended September 28, 2002).
10.3* 1995 Director Option Plan as amended, and form of
agreement thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.4 to the Registrant's Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 1997 (the "1997 Form 10-K")).
55
10.4 Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Registrant
and its officers and directors (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the 1995 Form S-1).
10.5 Office Building Lease between Registrant and Puente
Hills Business Center II dated May 20, 1993, as amended
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6.2 to the 1995
Form S-1).
10.6 Lease Agreement dated as of April 30, 1998 between the
Registrant and the Joseph and Eda Pell Revocable Trust
dated August 18, 1989 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.9 to the 1998 Form 10-K).
10.7 Lease Agreement dated June 1, 1998 between the
Registrant and Technology Centre Associates LLC for the
premises located at 180 Rose Orchard Way, San Jose,
California (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10
to the 1998 Form 10-K).
10.8 First Amendment to Lease Agreement dated June 1, 1998
between the Registrant and Technology Centre Associates
LLC dated July 31, 1998 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.10.1 to the 1998 Form 10-K).
10.9 Lease Agreement dated June 1, 1998 between Registrant
and Technology Centre Associates LLC for the premises
located at 150 Rose Orchard Way, San Jose, California
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Registrant's Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
September 30, 2000 (the "2001 First Quarter Form
10-Q")).
10.10 Second Amendment to Lease Agreement dated March 31, 2000
between Registrant and Technology Centre Associates LLC
dated July 31, 1998 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.10.3 to the 2000 Form 10-K).
10.11 First Addendum to Lease Agreement dated August 18, 1999
between Registrant and Joseph and Eda Pell Revocable
Trust dated August 18, 1989 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.24 to the 2000 Form 10-K).
10.12 Lease Agreement dated May 19, 2000 between NanoMotion
Inc. and United Insurance Co. of America for premises
located at Santa Barbara, California (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.10.6 to the 2000 Form 10-K).
10.13** Original Equipment Manufacturer Agreement between
Registrant and Hirata Corporation dated January 31, 1995
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the 2000
Form 10-K/A).
10.14** Original Equipment Manufacturing Agreement between
Registrant and Yaskawa Electric Corp. dated August 29,
2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to the
2000 Form 10-K/A).
10.15 Industrial R&D Lease Agreement dated October 31, 2000
between Registrant and Tri-Valley Campus I, LLC for
premises located at Livermore, California (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the 2001 First Quarter
Form 10-Q).
10.16 Amendment No. 1 dated September 9, 1997 to Office
Building Lease between Registrant and Puente Hills
Business Center II dated May 20, 1993 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the 2001 First Quarter Form
10-Q).
10.17 Amendment No. 2 dated June 17, 1998 to Office Building
Lease between Registrant and Puente Hills Business
Center II dated May 20, 1993 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.4 to the 2001 First Quarter Form 10-Q).
10.18** Supply, Development and License Agreement dated October
22, 2002, between the Registrant and JDS Uniphase
Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to the 2002 First Quarter 10-Q).
56
10.19* 2001 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 74.1 to the Registrant's Registration Statement
on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on October 11, 2001 (No. 333-71374).
10.20 Letter Agreement and Note effective as of November 30,
2002 between the Registrant and JDS Uniphase Corporation
(incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Form 8-K
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
January 22, 2003).
10.21 Amended Second Anniversary Note Agreement effective as
of December 13, 2002 between the Registrant and the
Holcomb Family Trust (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to the 2003 Second Quarter 10-Q).
10.22 Accounts Receivable Purchase Agreement dated as of March
21, 2003 between the Registrant and Silicon Valley Bank
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter ended March 29, 2003 (the "2003 Third
Quarter 10-Q")).
10.23 Intellectual Property Security Agreement dated as of
March 21, 2003 between the Registrant and Silicon Valley
Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
2003 Third Quarter 10-Q).
10.24 Warrant to Purchase Stock dated as of March 21, 2003
between the Registrant and Silicon Valley Bank
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the 2003
Third Quarter 10-Q).
10.25 Convertible Subordinated Note issued by Registrant to
Tri-Valley Campus, LLC dated August 6, 2003
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on August 8, 2003).
10.26 Lease Amendment dated as of August 6, 2003 between the
Registrant and Tri-Valley Campus LLC.
21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
23.1 Consent of Independent Auditors.
24.1 Power of Attorney (See Signature Page to this Form
10-K).
31.1 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and the
Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
** Confidential treatment has been requested as to certain portions of this
exhibit. An unredacted version of this exhibit has been filed separately
with the SEC.
+ Schedules have been omitted and will be provided to the SEC upon request.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K.
On April 14, 2003, a Form 8-K was filed by Adept announcing that, on April 11,
2003, it received a notice from Nasdaq indicating that its securities would be
delisted from The Nasdaq Stock Market as of the open of business on Tuesday,
April 15, 2003.
57
On April 23, 2003, a Form 8-K was filed by Adept announcing its financial
results for its third fiscal quarter ended March 29, 2003.
On August 6, 2003, a Form 8-K was filed by Adept announcing that it had
restructured its lease obligations with the landlord of its Livermore,
California facilities and announcing its financial results for its fourth
quarter ended June 30, 2003.
(c) Exhibits. See Item 15(a)(3) above.
(d) Financial Statement Schedules. See Item 15(a)(2) above.
58
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
ADEPT TECHNOLOGY, INC.
By: /s/ Michael W. Overby
--------------------------------------
Michael W. Overby
Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
By: /s/ Brian R. Carlisle
--------------------------------------
Brian R. Carlisle
Chairman of the Board of Directors and
Chief Executive Officer
Date: September 29, 2003
59
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears
below constitutes and appoints Brian R. Carlisle and Michael W. Overby and each
of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, each with full power
of substitution and resubstitution, to sign any and all amendments to this
Annual Report on Form 10-K and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and
other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them,
full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith, as fully to all
intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying
and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or their substitute
or substitutes, or any of them, shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report
has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and
in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
Signature Title Date
--------- ----- ----
/s/ Brian R. Carlisle Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief September 29, 2003
--------------------- Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
(Brian R. Carlisle)
/s/ Michael W. Overby Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial September 29, 2003
---------------------
(Michael W. Overby) Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)
/s/ Bruce E. Shimano Vice President, Research and Development, September 29, 2003
-------------------- Secretary and Director
(Bruce E. Shimano)
/s/ Ronald E. F. Codd Director September 29, 2003
---------------------
(Ronald E. F. Codd)
/s/ Michael P. Kelly Director September 29, 2003
--------------------
(Michael P. Kelly)
/s/ Cary R. Mock Director September 29, 2003
----------------
(Cary R. Mock)
60
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
ADEPT TECHNOLOGY, INC.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Report of Ernst & Young, LLP, Independent Auditors.......................... 62
Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2003 and June 30, 2002.............. 63
Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the three years
in the period ended June 30, 2003.......................................... 64
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three years
in the period ended June 30, 2003.......................................... 65
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity (Deficit) for each of
the three years in the period ended June 30, 2003.......................... 66
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.................................. 67
61
REPORT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The Shareholders and Board of Directors
Adept Technology, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Adept
Technology, Inc. as of June 30, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2003. Our audits also
included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index as Item 15(a)(2).
These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Adept
Technology, Inc. at June 30, 2003 and 2002, and the consolidated results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
June 30, 2003, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement
schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements as a
whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth
therein.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming
that Adept Technology, Inc. will continue as a going concern. As more fully
described in Note 1, the Company has incurred recurring operating losses, has a
net capital deficiency and has experienced declining cash balances. These
conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described
in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect
the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets
or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the
outcome of this uncertainty.
As described in Note 4, the Company has changed on July 1, 2001 its method of
accounting for goodwill upon adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
San Jose, California
August 4, 2003
62
ADEPT TECHNOLOGY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, June 30,
2003 2002
---- ----
ASSETS (in thousands)
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents ................................................................. $ 3,234 $ 17,375
Short-term investments .................................................................... -- 4,306
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,124 in
2003 and $832 in 2002 ................................................................ 10,948 12,500
Inventories ............................................................................... 7,122 11,189
Deferred tax assets and other current assets .............................................. 717 854
--------- ---------
Total current assets .................................................................. 22,021 46,224
Property and equipment at cost ................................................................. 11,751 12,688
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization ................................................. 8,591 6,965
--------- ---------
Property and equipment, net .................................................................... 3,160 5,723
Goodwill ....................................................................................... 7,671 6,889
Other intangibles, net ......................................................................... 1,176 1,124
Other assets ................................................................................... 1,753 2,534
--------- ---------
Total assets .......................................................................... $ 35,781 $ 62,494
========= =========
LIABILITIES, REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK, AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable .......................................................................... $ 6,094 $ 6,561
Accrued payroll and related expenses ...................................................... 1,535 2,463
Accrued warranty .......................................................................... 1,833 1,566
Deferred revenue .......................................................................... 1,145 637
Accrued restructuring charges ............................................................. 3,122 1,909
Accrued liabilities related to business acquisitions ...................................... 135 2,730
Short term debt ........................................................................... 97 --
Other accrued liabilities ................................................................. 879 1,368
--------- ---------
Total current liabilities ............................................................. 14,840 17,234
Long term liabilities:
Restructuring charges ..................................................................... 383 1,450
Subordinated convertible note ............................................................. 3,007 --
Other long-term liabilities ............................................................... 4,134 2,906
Commitments and contingencies
Redeemable convertible preferred stock, no par value:
5,000 shares authorized, 100 shares issued and outstanding at
June 30, 2003 and 2002
(liquidation preference - $25,000) .......................................................... 25,000 25,000
Shareholders' equity (deficit):
Preferred stock, no par value: 5,000 shares authorized, none issued and
outstanding ............................................................................... -- --
Common stock, no par value: 70,000 shares authorized, 15,392 shares issued
and outstanding in 2003, and 14,051 shares in 2002 ......................................... 108,869 107,384
Accumulated deficit ........................................................................... (120,452) (91,480)
--------- ---------
Total shareholders' equity (deficit) .................................................. (11,583) 15,904
--------- ---------
Total liabilities, redeemable convertible preferred stock and
shareholders' equity (deficit) ................................................................ $ 35,781 $ 62,494
========= =========
63
ADEPT TECHNOLOGY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Year Ended June 30,
-------------------
2003 2002 2001
--------- --------- ---------
(in thousands, except per share data)
Net revenues ................................................................. $ 44,816 $ 57,039 $ 100,313
Cost of revenues ............................................................. 34,076 37,868 65,303
--------- --------- ---------
Gross margin ................................................................. 10,740 19,171 35,010
Operating expenses:
Research, development and engineering .................................. 11,719 20,398 22,727
Selling, general and administrative .................................... 22,001 28,994 36,002
Restructuring charges .................................................. 5,324 17,659 --
Amortization of goodwill and other intangibles ......................... 728 725 6,818
Impairment of goodwill ................................................. -- 6,608 --
Gain on sale of assets ................................................. -- (1,566) --
--------- --------- ---------
Total operating expenses ..................................................... 39,772 72,818 65,547
--------- --------- ---------
Operating loss ............................................................... (29,032) (53,647) (30,537)
Interest income .............................................................. 284 441 745
Interest expense ............................................................. 193 3 12
--------- --------- ---------
Loss before income taxes and cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle ....................................................... (28,941) (53,209) (29,804)
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes .................................... 31 (3,358) 5,396
--------- --------- ---------
Loss before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle .............. (28,972) (49,851) (35,200)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle .......................... -- (9,973) --
--------- --------- ---------
Net loss ..................................................................... $ (28,972) $ (59,824) $ (35,200)
========= ========= =========
Basic and diluted net loss per share:
Before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle ............. $ (1.94) $ (3.64) $ (3.02)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle .................... -- (0.73) --
--------- --------- ---------
After cumulative effect of change in accounting principle .............. $ (1.94) $ (4.37) $ (3.02)
========= ========= =========
Number of shares used in computing per share amounts:
Basic .................................................................. 14,955 13,691 11,637
========= ========= =========
Diluted ................................................................ 14,955 13,691 11,637
========= ========= =========
See accompanying notes.
64
ADEPT TECHNOLOGY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended June 30,
-------------------
(in thousands)
2003 2002 2001
-------- -------- --------
Operating activities
Net loss ............................................................................. $(28,972) $(59,824) $(35,200)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle ............................... -- 9,973 --
Depreciation ...................................................................... 2,772 3,011 3,646
Amortization of intangibles ....................................................... 728 725 6,818
Non-cash interest expense ........................................................ 20 -- --
Asset impairment charges .......................................................... 318 9,167 --
Goodwill impairment ............................................................... -- 6,608 --
Provision for inventory ........................................................... 1,541 -- 4,839
Deferred income taxes ............................................................. 18 134 4,971
Loss on disposal of property and equipment ............................................ 16 461 37
Gain on sale of assets ............................................................ -- (1,566) --
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions:
Accounts receivable ............................................................ 1,566 9,384 4,358
Inventories .................................................................... 2,591 3,469 (7,436)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets ...................................... 124 1,247 303
Other assets ................................................................... 781 1,986 (1,024)
Accounts payable ............................................................... (602) (4,114) (1,207)
Other accrued liabilities ...................................................... (3,358) (2,058) (12)
Accrued restructuring charges .................................................. 146 3,359 --
Subordinated Convertible Note .................................................. 3,007 -- --
Other long term liabilities .................................................... 1,228 (147) 589
-------- -------- --------
Net cash used in operating activities ............................................. (18,076) (18,185) (19,318)
-------- -------- --------
Investing activities
Business acquisitions ............................................................. (198) (8,365) (7,050)
Purchase of property and equipment ................................................ (371) (1,475) (8,523)
Proceeds from sale of assets ...................................................... -- 1,729 --
Purchases of short-term available-for-sale investments ............................ (9,275) (35,906) (36,500)
Sales of short-term available-for-sale investments ................................ 13,581 34,400 40,650
-------- -------- --------
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities ............................... 3,737 (9,617) (11,423)
-------- -------- --------
Financing activities
Proceeds from issuance of redeemable convertible preferred stock .................. -- 25,000 --
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net ....................................... -- -- 32,424
Proceeds from employee stock incentive program and employee
stock purchase plan, net of repurchases and cancellations ...................... 198 1,477 3,530
-------- -------- --------
Net cash provided by financing activities ......................................... 198 26,477 35,954
-------- -------- --------
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents ...................................... (14,141) (1,325) 5,213
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period ........................................ 17,375 18,700 13,487
-------- -------- --------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period .............................................. $ 3,234 $ 17,375 $ 18,700
======== ======== ========
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activities:
Issuance of common stock pursuant to terms of Meta acquisition agreement .............. $ 825 $ -- $ --
Issuance of common stock pursuant to terms of HexaVision
acquisition agreement ................................................................ $ -- $ 1,213 $ --
Issuance of common stock pursuant to terms of CHAD acquisition agreement .............. $ 442 $ 1,556 $ --
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest ............................................................................. $ 133 $ 5 $ 12
Taxes paid (refunded) ................................................................ $ (7) $ (2,903) $ (264)
See accompanying notes.
65
ADEPT TECHNOLOGY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Retained Total
Common Stock Earnings/ Shareholders'
------------------------ (Accumulated Equity
Shares Amount Deficit) (Deficit)
------ --------- --------- ---------
(in thousands)
Balance at June 30, 2000 ................................. 10,677 $ 67,184 $ 3,544 $ 70,728
Common stock issued under employee stock
incentive program and employee stock
purchase plan .................................. 488 3,530 -- 3,530
Common stock issued in conjunction with
follow-on offering (less issuance
costs of $1,056) ............................... 2,000 32,424 -- 32,424
Net loss and comprehensive loss ................... -- -- (35,200) (35,200)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2001 ............................... 13,165 $ 103,138 $ (31,656) $ 71,482
Common stock issued under employee stock
incentive program and employee stock
purchase plan .................................. 555 1,477 -- 1,477
Common stock issued in connection with
acquisitions ................................... 331 2,769 -- 2,769
Net loss and comprehensive loss ................... -- -- (59,824) (59,824)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2002 ............................... 14,051 $ 107,384 $ (91,480) $ 15,904
Common stock issued under employee stock
incentive program and employee stock
purchase plan .................................. 554 198 -- 198
Common stock issued in connection with
acquisitions ................................... 787 1,267 -- 1,267
Warrants issued in connection with
financing arrangement .......................... -- 20 -- 20
Net loss and comprehensive loss ................... -- -- (28,972) (28,972)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2003 ............................... 15,392 $ 108,869 $(120,452) $ (11,583)
========= ========= ========= =========
See accompanying notes.
66
ADEPT TECHNOLOGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Company
Adept Technology, Inc. ("Adept" or the "Company") was incorporated under the
laws of the state of California on June 14, 1983. The Company designs,
manufactures and sells factory automation components and systems for the food,
communications, automotive, appliance, semiconductor and life sciences
industries throughout the world.
The Company has experienced declining revenues and incurred operating losses in
each of the last three fiscal years. During this period, the Company has also
consumed significant cash and other financial resources, and presently has
minimal liquidity. The Company had a net capital deficiency of $11.6 million.
During this period, the Company has also consumed significant cash and other
financial resources, and presently has minimal liquidity. In response to these
conditions, the Company reduced operating costs and employee headcount, and
restructured certain operating lease commitments in fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2003.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, the Company reduced its headcount by
an additional 7% of its total employees, which it expects to fully implement in
the second quarter of fiscal 2004. These adjustments to its operations have also
significantly reduced its cash consumption. Finally, the Company is accelerating
the phase-in of newer generation products that it expects will reduce the amount
of inventory that Adept will need to maintain. In addition, the Company is
seeking various debt and equity financing alternatives to improve its near term
liquidity, and continues to pursue additional outside sources of financing to
address future working capital requirements.
As of June 30, 2003, the Company had working capital of approximately $7.2
million, including $3.2 million in cash and cash equivalents. The Company is
currently litigating with the landlord of its San Jose facility regarding its
lease obligations for that facility. The Company has vacated and no longer pays
rent on this facility. The Company has recorded expenses in the amount of $2.3
million for the remaining unpaid rent associated with this lease; however, it
has not reserved the cash associated with such unpaid rent expenses. The
Company's cash usage for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 and its expectations
for cash usage for the first two quarters of fiscal 2004 are significantly
impacted by its nonpayment of rent for this facility. If the Company receives a
material adverse judgment in the San Jose lease litigation and does not have
control of the timing of the payments of any such judgment, it may not have
sufficient cash to meet its obligations and therefore, it may be required to
cease operations. For a description of this litigation, see "Legal Proceedings."
Even if the Company does not receive an adverse judgment in the San Jose lease
litigation, if the results of its search for additional outside sources of
financing is unsuccessful, or if adequate funds are not available on acceptable
terms or at all and the Company is unable to achieve its projected revenues or
if operating expenses exceed current estimates, the Company will be forced to
curtail its operations and the Company may not be able to take advantage of
market opportunities, develop or enhance new products, pursue acquisitions that
would complement its existing product offerings or enhance its technical
capabilities, execute its business plan or otherwise respond to competitive
pressures or unanticipated requirements. Even if the Company complete a
financing, the transaction is likely to involve the incurrence of debt or
issuance of debt or equity securities of Adept, which would dilute the
outstanding equity.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that Adept
will continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any
adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and
classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that
may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2003 and 2002
and for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2003; include the
accounts of Adept and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant
intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated upon consolidation.
67
Unless otherwise indicated, references to any year in these Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements refer to the Company's fiscal year ended June
30.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities
and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Foreign Currency Translation
The Company applies Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 52 ("SFAS
52"), "Foreign Currency Translation," with respect to its international
operations, which are sales and service entities. The accounts denominated in
non-U.S. currencies have been re-measured using the U.S. dollar as the
functional currency. All monetary assets and liabilities are remeasured at the
current exchange rate at the end of the period, nonmonetary assets and
liabilities are remeasured at historical exchange rates, and revenues and
expenses are remeasured at average exchange rates in effect during the period.
Translation gains (losses) resulting from the process of remeasuring foreign
currency financial statements into U.S. dollars were $26,000, $191,000 and
($119,000) in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Foreign currency transaction
gains (losses) were $495,000, ($786,000) and ($326,000) in 2003, 2002 and 2001,
respectively. Foreign currency transaction and translation gains (losses) are
recorded as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses in the
accompanying statement of operations.
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Short-term Investments
The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original
maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Short-term investments
in marketable securities consist principally of debt instruments with maturities
between three and 12 months. Investments are classified as held-to-maturity,
trading, or available-for-sale at the time of purchase.
At June 30, 2002, all of the Company's investments in marketable securities were
classified as available-for-sale and were carried at fair market value, which
approximated cost. The Company has no short-term investments at June 30, 2003.
Fair market value is based on quoted market prices on the last day of the year.
The cost of the securities is based upon the specific identification method.
June 30,
--------
2003 2002
---- ----
(in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash................................ $ 3,196 $ 6,709
Money market funds.................. 38 10,666
--------- ---------
Cash and cash equivalents.............. $ 3,234 $ 17,375
========= =========
Short-term investments
Certificates of deposit........... $ -- $ 6
Auction rate securities........... -- 4,300
--------- ---------
Short-term investments................. $ -- $ 4,306
========= =========
Realized gains or losses, interest, and dividends are included in interest
income. Realized and unrealized gains or losses from available-for-sale
securities were not material in 2003, 2002 or 2001.
68
Fair Values of Financial Instruments
Fair values of cash equivalents approximate cost due to the short period of time
to maturity. The estimated fair value of the Company's short- and long-term debt
approximated its carrying value. The estimated fair value of the debt is based
primarily on quoted market prices, as well as borrowing rates currently
available to the Company for bank loans with similar terms and maturities.
Comprehensive Income
For the three-year period ended June 30, 2003, there were no significant
differences between the Company's comprehensive loss and its net loss.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of standard cost, which approximates actual
(first-in, first-out method) or market (estimated net realizable value). The
components of inventories are as follows:
June 30,
--------
2003 2002
---- ----
(in thousands)
Raw materials................................ $ 2,422 $ 4,952
Work-in-process.............................. 1,858 3,049
Finished goods............................... 2,842 3,188
--------- ---------
$ 7,122 $ 11,189
========= =========
Warranties
The Company offers a two year parts and one year labor limited warranty for all
of its products. The specific terms and conditions of those warranties are set
forth in the Company's "Terms and Conditions of Sale", which is published in
sales catalogs and on each sales order acknowledgement. The Company estimates
the costs that may be incurred under its limited warranty, and records a
liability at the time product revenue is recognized. Factors that affect the
Company's warranty liability include the number of installed units, historical
and anticipated rates of warranty claims, and costs per claim. The Company
periodically assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty liabilities and
adjusts the amounts as necessary.
Changes in the Company's product liability during fiscal 2003 are as follows:
(in thousands)
Balance at June 30, 2002 $ 1,566
Warranties issued 1,583
Additional warranty provision 246
Warranty claims (1,252)
Changes in liability for pre-existing
warranties including expirations (310)
--------------
Balance at June 30, 2003 $ 1,833
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The Company manufactures and sells its products to system integrators, end users
and original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, in diversified industries. The
Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and does not
require collateral. However, the Company may require customers to make payments
in advance of shipment or to provide a letter of credit.
Adept maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting
from the inability of its customers to make required payments and such losses
have been within management's expectations. Adept assesses the customer's
69
ability to pay based on a number of factors, including its past transaction
history with the customer and credit worthiness of the customer. Management
specifically analyzes accounts receivable and historical bad debts, customer
concentrations, customer credit-worthiness, current economic trends and changes
in Company's customer payment terms when evaluating the adequacy of the
allowances for doubtful accounts. Adept does not generally request collateral
from its customers. If the financial condition of the customers were to
deteriorate in the future, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make
payments, additional allowances may be required. Amounts charged to bad debt
expense were $367,000, $319,000 and $214,000 in 2003, 2002, and 2001,
respectively.
Loans to Employees
Loans to employees, which consist of amounts advanced to non-officer employees
of the Company in connection with employee relocation and retention, are
summarized as follows:
June 30,
--------
2003 2002
---- ----
(in thousands)
Short-term loans to employees............ $ 25 $ 25
Long-term loans to employees............. 122 162
------- -------
$ 147 $ 187
======= =======
Short-term loans to employees are included in other current assets. Long-term
loans to employees are included in other assets.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost.
The components of property and equipment are summarized as follows:
June 30,
--------
2003 2002
---- ----
(in thousands)
Cost:
Machinery and equipment....................... $ 3,023 $ 3,042
Computer equipment............................ 5,865 5,806
Office furniture and equipment................ 2,863 3,840
--------- ---------
11,751 12,688
Accumulated depreciation and amortization..... 8,591 6,965
--------- ---------
Net property and equipment.................... $ 3,160 $ 5,723
========= =========
Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated
useful lives of the assets, which range from three to five years.
Acquired Intangible Assets and Goodwill
Acquired intangible assets consist of purchased technology and non-compete
agreements related to the Company's acquisitions accounted for using the
purchase method. Prior to July 1, 2001, and the adoption of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standard No. 142, amortization of these acquired intangible
assets and goodwill was calculated on a straight-line basis over the following
estimated useful lives of the assets:
Purchased technology 2-4 years
Non-compete agreements 4 years
Goodwill 2-4 years
Effective July 1, 2001, goodwill is no longer amortized but rather is subject to
annual impairment tests.
70
Long-Lived Assets
The Company periodically assesses the impairment of long-lived assets used in
operations in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 144 (SFAS 144), "Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets," An impairment review is performed whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be
recoverable. Factors the Company considers important which could trigger an
impairment review include, but are not limited to, significant under-performance
relative to historical or projected future operating results, significant
changes in the manner of use of the acquired assets or the strategy for the
Company's overall business, and significant industry or economic trends. When
the Company determines that the carrying value of the long-lived assets may not
be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators,
the Company measures any impairment based on a discounted future cash flow
method using a discount rate commensurate with the risk inherent in its current
business model.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes product revenue in accordance with Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 101, when persuasive evidence of a non-cancelable arrangement
exists, delivery has occurred and/or services have been rendered, the price is
fixed or determinable, collectibility is reasonably assured, legal title and
economic risk is transferred to the customer, and when an economic exchange has
taken place. If a significant portion of the price is due after the Company's
normal payment terms, which are 30 to 90 days from the invoice date, the Company
accounts for the price as not being fixed and determinable. In these cases, if
all of the other conditions referred to above are met, the Company recognizes
revenue as the invoice becomes due. In Japan, the Company sells its products
through a reseller, and has separate agreements with this reseller for each of
Adept's product lines that it sells. For all RDA Real-Time Control and RDA
Mechanical Components with this reseller, the Company has a pass-through
arrangement, such that under this arrangement, the Company defers 100% of the
revenue upon shipment and the reseller is not obligated to remit payment to the
Company until they receive payment from the end user. When all other aspects of
SAB 101 have been satisfied, the Company recognizes revenue upon payment from
the end user. For all other product lines, no pass through arrangement exists.
For these products the Company follows its normal revenue recognition policies.
The Company recognizes software revenue, primarily related to its simulation
software products, in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants' Statement of Position 97-2 ("SOP 97-2") on Software Revenue
Recognition. License revenue is recognized on shipment of the product provided
that no significant vendor or post-contract support obligations remain and that
collection of the resulting receivable is deemed probable by management.
Insignificant vendor and post-contract support obligations are accrued upon
shipment of the licensed product. For software that is installed and integrated
by the customer, revenue is recognized upon shipment assuming functionality has
already been proven in prior sales, and there are no customizations that would
cause a substantial acceptance risk. For software that is installed and
integrated by Adept, revenue is recognized upon customer signoff of a final
product acceptance form.
Service revenue includes training, consulting and customer support. Revenues
from training and consulting are recognized at the time the service is performed
and the customer has accepted the work. Deferred revenue primarily relates to
items deferred under SAB 101.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of
credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents and trade receivables. The
Company places its cash equivalents and short-term investments with high
credit-quality financial institutions. The Company invests its excess cash in
commercial paper, readily marketable debt instruments and collateralized funds
of U.S., state and municipal government entities. Adept has established
guidelines relative to credit ratings, diversification and maturities that seek
to maintain safety and liquidity. The Company is exposed to credit risk in the
event of default by the financial institutions holding the cash and cash
equivalents to the extent of the amount recorded on the balance sheets in excess
of insured limits.
71
Research, Development and Engineering Costs
Research, development and engineering costs, other than purchased computer
software and capital equipment, are charged to expense when incurred. The
Company has in the past offset research, development and engineering expenses by
the third party funding as the Company retains the rights to any technology that
is developed. The Company did not receive any third party funding in fiscal 2003
or fiscal 2002. Third party funding in fiscal 2001 was $49,000. The Company is
not presently a party to any such research and development arrangements.
Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are expensed in the period incurred. Advertising costs were
$58,000 in 2003, $161,000 in 2002, and $307,000 in 2001. The Company does not
incur any direct response advertising costs.
Income Taxes
The liability method is used to account for income taxes. Deferred tax assets
and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial
reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the
enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are
expected to reverse.
Stock-Based Compensation
In accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123 ("SFAS 123"), "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" and "Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148 ("SFAS 148"), "Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure," Adept applies Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees"
("APB 25") and related interpretations in accounting for its stock option plans
and stock purchase plan. Accordingly, the Company does not recognize
compensation cost for stock options granted at fair market value. Note 9 of the
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements describes the plans operated by
Adept.
If compensation expense for the Company's stock option plans had been determined
based upon fair values at the grant dates for awards under those plans in
accordance with SFAS 123, the Company's pro forma net loss, and net loss per
share would be as follows:
June 30th
-------------------------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
---- ---- ----
(In thousands)
Net loss, as reported.............................. $ (28,972) $ (59,824) $ (35,200)
Deduct: Total stock based employee compensation
expense determined under fair value based method
for all awards, net of related tax effects....... (2,379) (7,372) (7,965)
----------- ----------- -----------
Pro forma net loss.................................. $ (31,351) $ (67,196) $ (43,165)
=========== =========== ===========
Basic and diluted loss per common share:
As reported...................................... $ (1.94) $ (4.37) $ (3.02)
========== =========== ===========
Pro forma........................................ $ (2.10) $ (4.91) $ (3.71)
========== =========== ===========
Because the method of accounting prescribed by SFAS 123 has not been applied to
options granted prior to July 1, 1995 and future years will include the impact
of future stock option grants, the resulting pro forma compensation cost may not
be representative of that to be expected in future years. The fair value of each
option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions for grants during
the years ended June 30, 2003, 2002 and 2001: risk-free interest rates of 3.53%
for 2003, 4.10% for 2002, and 3.83% for 2001; a dividend yield of 0% for all
three years; a weighted-average expected life of 9.79 years for 2003, 7.86 years
for 2002 and 8.6 years for 2001; and a volatility factor of the expected market
price of the Company's common stock of 1.70 for 2003, 1.74 for 2002 and 1.54 for
2001. The weighted average grant date fair value of options was $0.14 for
options granted in 2003, $3.53 in 2002 and $18.86 in 2001.
Compensation cost is estimated for the fair value of the employees' purchase
rights under the ESPP using the Black-Scholes model with the following
assumptions for rights granted in 2003, 2002 and 2001: a dividend yield of 0%
for all three years; expected life of five months in 2003 and six months for
72
2002 and 2001; expected volatility of 1.70 for 2003, 2.17 for 2002 and 1.17 for
2001; and a risk-free interest rate of 4.6% for 2003, 4.6% for 2002 and 5.6% for
2001. The weighted-average fair market value of the purchase rights granted was
$1.18 for rights granted in 2003, $4.38 in 2002 and $8.19 for 2001.
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the
fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are fully
transferable. In addition, option models require the input of highly subjective
assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because the Company's
employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those
of traded options, and because changes in the subjective assumptions can
materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's opinion, the existing
models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of
its employee stock options.
Net Income (Loss) Per Share
SFAS No. 128, "Earnings Per Share" ("EPS"), requires the presentation of basic
and diluted EPS. Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net
income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of
common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential
dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock
were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of
common stock that then participates in the earnings of the Company. Dilutive
common equivalent shares consist of stock options calculated using the treasury
stock method.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Interpretation No. 46, " Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities" (FIN 46).
FIN 46 requires certain variable interest entities to be consolidated by the
primary beneficiary of the entity if the equity investors in the entity do not
have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have
sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without
additional subordinated financial support from other parties. FIN 46 is
effective for all new variable interest entities created or acquired after
January 31, 2003. For variable interest entities created or acquired prior to
February 1, 2003, the provision of FIN 46 must be applied for the first interim
or annual period beginning after June 15, 2003. The adoption of FIN 46 did not
have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.
In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation - Transition and Disclosure," which is effective for fiscal years
ending after December 15, 2002. SFAS 148 amends SFAS 123, "Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation," to provide alternative methods of transition to SFAS
123's fair value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation.
SFAS 148 also amends the disclosure provisions of SFAS 123 and APB Opinion No.
28, "Interim Financial Reporting," to require disclosure in the summary of
significant accounting policies of the effect of an entity's accounting policy
with respect to stock-based employee compensation on reported net income and
earnings per share in annual and interim financial statements. The transition
methods of SFAS 148 are effective for the Company's June 30, 2003 Form 10-K. The
Company continues to use the intrinsic value method of accounting for
stock-based compensation. As a result, the transition provisions will not have
an effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In November of 2002, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a consensus
on Issue No. 00-21, "Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables." EITF
Issue No. 00-21 provides guidance on how to account for arrangements that
involve the delivery or performance of multiple products, services, and/or
rights to use assets. The provisions of EITF Issue No. 00-21 will apply to
revenue arrangements entered into in fiscal periods beginning after June 15,
2003. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of EITF
Issue No. 00-21 will have on the Company's financial condition and results of
operations.
In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45, "Guarantor's Accounting
and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Guarantees of Indebtedness
of Others" (FIN 45). The Interpretation elaborates on the existing disclosure
requirements for most guarantees, including product warranties. The
Interpretation requires that at the time a company issues certain guarantees,
the company must recognize an initial liability for the fair value, or market
value, of the obligations it assumes under that guarantee and must disclose that
information in its interim and annual financial statements. The initial
recognition and initial measurement provisions of the Interpretation are
applicable on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after
December 31, 2002. The Interpretation's disclosure requirements are effective
73
for financial statements of interim or annual periods ending after December 15,
2002 and are applicable to all guarantees issued by the guarantor subject to the
Interpretation's scope, including guarantees issued prior to the issuance of the
Interpretation. The Company adopted the Interpretation effective for the fiscal
quarter ended December 28, 2002. As the Company has not made any significant
financial guarantees other than product warranties, the adoption of FIN 45 did
not have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.
In July of 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated
with Exit or Disposal Activities." SFAS No. 146 addresses the financial
accounting and reporting for obligations associated with an exit activity,
including restructuring, or with a disposal of long-lived assets. Exit
activities include, but are not limited to eliminating or reducing product
lines, terminating employees and contracts, and relocating plant facilities or
personnel. SFAS No. 146 specifies that a company will record a liability for a
cost associated with an exit or disposal activity only when that liability is
incurred and can be measured at fair value. Therefore, a commitment to an exit
plan or a plan of disposal expresses only the Company's intended future actions
and, therefore, does not meet the requirement for recognizing a liability and
the related expense. SFAS No. 146 is effective prospectively for exit or
disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. The adoption of SFAS No.
146 did not have a material effect on the Company's financial position or
results of operations.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated
Statement of Cash Flows for fiscal years 2001 and 2002 have been reclassified to
conform to the 2003 presentation.
2. Mergers and Acquisitions
During the three-year period ended June 30, 2003, Adept completed three
acquisitions:
o Meta Control Technologies, Inc.,
o CHAD Industries Inc., and
o HexaVision Technologies Inc.
These acquisitions are described below.
Meta Control Technologies, Inc.
On August 30, 2002, the Company completed the acquisition of a controlling
interest in Meta Control Technologies, Inc., or Meta, a Delaware corporation.
Meta develops, designs, manufactures and markets products that automate a wide
range of manufacturing processes requiring precise motion, accurate machine
vision and rapid process instrumentation. Some of the applications that make use
of the Company's technology include semiconductor and electronics assembly,
micro-mechanical and fiber optic assembly, laboratory automation and discrete
process automation. The acquisition of Meta extends the Company's controls
architecture to include two axis, low power controls in small packages allowing
remote placement of motion and sensor controls that directly plug into Adept's
new architecture using IEEE 1394 Firewire technology. In addition, Meta has a
line of programmable cameras that when combined with the low power controller
and Adept's HexSight software can be packaged as a very low cost, competitive
OEM product. The results of Meta's operations have been included in Adept's
consolidated financial statements since August 30, 2002.
Upon the closing of the acquisition transaction with Meta, the Company acquired
a 67% ownership interest in Meta, with the remaining 33% ownership interest in
Meta being held in escrow for the benefit of Meta. The acquisition agreement
provides that Adept will acquire all of these remaining shares in return for the
provision of discounts and royalty payments to the shareholder and its
affiliates as described in the paragraph below but will, in any event and
regardless of whether discounts are incurred or royalties paid, acquire 100% of
the stock of Meta no later than August 2008 for no additional consideration.
Under the terms of the Meta acquisition agreement, the Company issued 730,000
shares of its common stock to the shareholders of Meta with a value of $825,000.
The value of the 730,000 shares was determined based on the average closing
price of the Company's stock on the period of three trading days ended September
3, 2002. Ten percent of the 730,000 shares of common stock were placed into
74
escrow for one year from the completion of the acquisition pending certain
contingencies pursuant to the terms of the acquisition agreement. The escrow
shares were released to the former Meta shareholders. Additionally, the Company
agreed to provide up to $1.7 million of discounts and royalties through August
2008 to a shareholder of Meta based upon future sales to that shareholder or
certain of its affiliates. Such amounts will be charged to operations when
incurred. As of June 30, 2003, the Company has not incurred any expenses related
to discounts and royalties. In connection with the acquisition, the Company
assumed a $500,000 line of credit with Meta's lender (See Note 6). Additionally,
the Company entered into a loan agreement for up to $800,000 with a former
shareholder of Meta and issued into escrow for the benefit of the lender 100,000
shares of the Company's common stock valued at $113,000, subject to certain
cancellation rights. In March 2003, the Company and the former shareholder
terminated the $800,000 loan agreement and the Company cancelled the 100,000
shares. No amounts were ever borrowed under the loan agreement.
Adept's management is primarily responsible for determining purchase price
allocations. Adept considered a number of factors, including valuations, in
determining the purchase price of Meta, which was allocated to tangible assets,
goodwill and developed technology. Goodwill represents the excess of the
purchase price of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired over their
fair value. Developed technology for the Meta acquisitions is being amortized
over four years.
Below is a table of the acquisition cost and purchase price allocation.
Acquisition Cost:
Stock issued at closing....................... $ 825
Long-term debt assumed........................ 511
Transaction costs............................. 232
----------
Total acquisition cost...................... $ 1,568
==========
Purchase Price Allocation:
Net book value of assets acquired............. $ 6
Developed technology.......................... 780
Goodwill...................................... 782
----------
Total....................................... $ 1,568
==========
Pro forma results for fiscal 2002 and for the period from July 1, 2002 through
August 30, 2002 (date of acquisition) have been omitted as such effects would
not differ materially from the Company's actual results.
CHAD Industries Inc.
On October 9, 2001, Adept completed the acquisition of all of the outstanding
shares of CHAD Industries Inc. (CHAD), now named Adept Orange Corporation, a
design and manufacturing company specializing in precision assembly automation
based in Orange, California. The acquisition of CHAD was a strategic step in
Adept's precision assembly strategy. Adept leverages CHAD's expertise in small
part feeding, precision tooling design, and the handling of odd-form components
to add capacity in precision assembly automation. In addition, Adept supports
CHAD's line of odd-form component assembly machines. The results of CHAD's
operations have been included in Adept's consolidated financial statements since
October 9, 2001.
Under terms of the acquisition agreement, the purchase price of $10.1 million
includes an aggregate of $8.4 million in cash, $150,000 in transaction costs and
200,000 shares of Adept common stock valued at $1.6 million. The value of the
200,000 shares issued was determined based on the average closing price of
Adept's stock over the period of five trading days prior to June 27, 2001, the
date of entry into the definitive agreement. Of the $8.4 million in cash, $4.2
million was paid as of the closing date on October 9, 2001 $2.6 million was paid
on October 9, 2002 and on December 13, 2002, CHAD and Adept amended the $1.6
million second anniversary promissory note and the funds held in escrow in the
amount of the note were released to Adept. The second anniversary promissory
note was paid in full in February 2003. In addition, the acquisition agreement
provided for Adept to make cash payments of $242,000 and potential stock
issuances consisting of 61,000 shares equal to approximately $467,000 over a
period of three years after the closing date to certain specified employees of
CHAD, contingent on the continued employment of such employees. As such, those
amounts have been appropriately excluded from the purchase price and are being
expensed as paid. As of June 30, 2003, $65,000 in contingent cash and no
contingent shares remain to be paid by October 9, 2004 contingent on the
75
continued employment of certain specified employees. This acquisition was
accounted for under the purchase method of accounting.
The purchase price of CHAD was allocated, based on an independent valuation, to
tangible assets, goodwill and developed technology. Goodwill represents the
excess of the purchase price of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired
over their fair value. Developed technology for the CHAD acquisition is being
amortized over three years.
For the CHAD acquisition, below is a table of the acquisition cost and purchase
price allocation.
Acquisition Cost:
Cash paid on closing.......................... $ 4,150
Cash paid after one year...................... 2,592
Cash paid after two years..................... 1,615
Stock issued at closing....................... 1,556
Transaction costs............................. 150
----------
Total acquisition cost...................... $ 10,063
==========
Purchase Price Allocation:
Net book value of assets acquired............. $ 553
Developed technology.......................... 430
Goodwill...................................... 9,080
----------
Total....................................... $ 10,063
==========
The following unaudited pro forma summary results of operations data has been
prepared assuming that the CHAD acquisition had occurred at the beginning of the
period presented. The consolidated results are not necessarily indicative of the
results of future operations nor of results that would have occurred had the
acquisitions been consummated as of the beginning of the period presented.
(in thousands, except per share amounts) 2002 2001
---- ----
Net revenues............................. $ 57,846 $ 106,113
Net loss................................. $(60,179) $ (35,755)
Basic and diluted net loss per share..... $ (4.39) $ (3.07)
HexaVision Technologies Inc.
On July 21, 2000, Adept acquired HexaVision Technologies Inc., now named Adept
Technology Canada Co. ("HexaVision"), a Canadian corporation. HexaVision was a
machine vision research and development company. Adept initially paid $5.5
million in cash, which included transaction costs of $0.4 million, and issued
shares of its common stock to the shareholders of HexaVision with a value of
$1.1 million. The acquisition of HexaVision has been accounted for under the
purchase method of accounting. Adept has included the results of operations of
HexaVision in Adept's results of operations beginning July 21, 2000. On July 21,
2001, pursuant to the terms of the share purchase agreement relating to the
acquisition of HexaVision, Adept issued 116,000 shares of its common stock with
a value of $1.1 million to the employees and former shareholders of HexaVision
and released $313,000 in cash from an escrow account. On July 21, 2002, Adept
made a second cash payment of $53,000 and released $1.4 million in cash from an
escrow account to the employees and former shareholders of HexaVision. The
contingency payments made and shares issued to the employees of HexaVision have
been appropriately recorded as operating expenses. The contingency payments made
and shares issued to the former shareholders of HexaVision have been allocated
to goodwill and accounted for as additional purchase price.
The purchase price of HexaVision was allocated, based on an independent
valuation, to tangible assets, goodwill and other intangible assets. Goodwill
represents the excess of the purchase price of the net tangible and intangible
assets acquired over their fair value. Other intangible assets primarily
represent developed technology and non-compete covenants. The allocation of the
purchase price is based upon an independent valuation of the assets and
liabilities of HexaVision.
76
For the HexaVision acquisition, below is a table of the acquisition cost and
purchase price allocation:
(in thousands)
Acquisition Cost:
Cash............................... $ 5,085
Transaction costs.................. 409
Contingency payments and share issuances:
Common stock...................... 794
Cash.............................. 1,267
-----------
Total acquisition cost........... $ 7,555
===========
Purchase Price Allocation
Net liabilities assumed............ $ (629)
Developed and core technology...... 201
Goodwill........................... 7,983
-----------
Total............................ $ 7,555
===========
As the acquisition was completed on July 21, 2000, pro forma results for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2001 would not differ materially from the actual
results.
3. Restructuring Charges
Fiscal 2002
During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002, Adept implemented a plan to
restructure certain of its operations across all three of its reportable
business segments. Adept adopted a restructuring plan during the three months
ended September 30, 2001 and due to market conditions, was required to implement
additional restructuring measures during the third quarter of fiscal 2002.
Significant items comprising the September 30, 2001 restructuring plan included
the following: exit of non-strategic product lines including SILMA inspection
software sales and maintenance, factory automation consulting and Multi-bus
controller support; consolidation of excess manufacturing and support
facilities; consolidation of the Company's European operations; reductions in
force and other salary reduction measures. The major actions comprising the
third quarter of fiscal 2002 restructuring plan included the following:
suspending current efforts focused on fiberoptics; closure of the Company's
Tucson, Arizona facility; the exit from manufacturing lease commitments in
Europe; and additional reductions in workforce.
For fiscal 2002, the Company recorded total restructuring charges of $17.7
million related to the actions identified. Of the $17.7 million restructuring
charge, Adept recorded $5.3 million in the three months ended March 30, 2002 and
$12.4 million in the three months ended September 30, 2001.
The restructuring charges include employee severance costs, lease commitments
for idle facilities and asset impairment charges and are as follows:
Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts
Charges Utilized Utilized Utilized Utilized
------- Q1 Fiscal Q1 Fiscal Q2 Fiscal Q2 Fiscal
(in thousands) 2002 2002 2002 2002
------- ------- ------- -----------
Cash Non Cash Cash Non Cash
------- ------- ------- -----------
Employee severance costs ............................ $ 1,692 $ 555 $ -- $ 370 $ --
Lease commitments ................................... 6,800 88 98 94 --
Asset impairment charges ............................ 9,167 -- 5,601 -- --
------- ------- ------- ------- -----------
Total ............................................. $17,659 $ 643 $ 5,699 $ 464 $ --
======= ======= ======= ======= ===========
77
Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts
Utilized Utilized Utilized Utilized Balance
Q3 Fiscal Q3 Fiscal Q4 Fiscal Q4 Fiscal June 30,
(in thousands) 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002
------ ------ ------ ----------- ------
Cash Non Cash Cash Non Cash
------ ------ ------ -----------
Employee severance costs ................... $ 187 $ -- $ 454 $ -- $ 126
Lease commitments .......................... 336 2,573 472 -- 3,139
Asset impairment charges ................... -- 3,472 -- -- 94
------ ------ ------ ----------- ------
Total .................................... $ 523 $6,045 $ 926 $ -- $3,359
====== ====== ====== =========== ======
Employee severance costs of $1.7 million represent a reduction of approximately
114 employees in most functional areas across all the reportable business
segments, and at June 30, 2002, all of the affected employees had ceased
employment with the Company. The Company paid the remaining accrued severance
before September 30, 2002. Lease commitments of $6.8 million consist of $4.2
million in charges resulting from the consolidation of manufacturing facilities
in San Jose and Livermore, California into Adept's technology center in
Livermore, California, plus the consolidation of certain support facilities in
Europe. The remaining $2.6 million in lease commitments relates to a non-cash
charge for excess production facilities for which the Company exchanged a
prepaid commitment fee in order to settle future obligations on excess
production facilities. The consolidation of these facilities has resulted in
operating lease commitments in excess of the Company's current and projected
needs for leased properties. At June 30, 2002, the long-term accrued
restructuring charges related to future rent commitments on non-cancelable lease
agreements. Payments against these lease commitments are expected to continue
for 18 months to three years based on lease terms. Asset impairment charges of
$9.2 million consist of $6.6 million in abandoned assets resulting from the
exiting of certain non-strategic product lines, consolidation of facilities, and
goodwill and other intangible assets write-off of $2.6 million. The charge for
abandoned assets include leasehold improvements and computer and office
equipment related to the exit of the SILMA inspection software product line as
well as leasehold improvements, machinery and equipment, and computer and office
equipment related to the consolidation of manufacturing and support facilities.
The abandoned assets also include the write-off of enterprise resource planning
system software associated with the closure of the Pensar-Tucson facility. The
goodwill and other intangible assets written off resulted from the Company's
acquisition of Pensar-Tucson in April 2000, which no longer had value to the
Company due to the closure of its Tucson, Arizona operations in March 2002.
Fiscal 2003
In response to continued weakness in customer demand, the Company implemented
additional restructuring measures during fiscal 2003. The Company recorded total
restructuring charges of $5.3 million related primarily to the continued
consolidation of its domestic facilities and reductions in workforce. Of the
$5.3 million in restructuring charges, $1.1 million was recorded in the first
quarter of fiscal 2003, $2.0 million was recorded in the third quarter of fiscal
2003 and $2.2 million was recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003.
Employee severance costs of $1.9 million represent a reduction of 84 employees
in most functional areas across all the reportable business segments, and by
June 30, 2003, all of the affected employees had ceased employment with the
Company and all severance payments are expected to be completed by the second
quarter of fiscal 2004. Lease commitments of $3.1 million resulted primarily
from the closure of the Company's San Jose, California facility as part of a
continuing effort to consolidate domestic operations and administration in the
Company's Livermore, California facility and the restructure of lease
commitments associated with excess capacity at the Company's Livermore,
California facility. Asset impairment charges of $318,000 represent write-offs
of abandoned assets primarily related to the Company's San Jose facility.
78
The following table summarizes the significant components of the Company's
fiscal 2003 restructuring at June 30, 2003:
Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts
Balance Additional Utilized Utilized Utilized Utilized
June 30, Charges Q1 Fiscal Q1 Fiscal Q2 Fiscal Q2 Fiscal
(in thousands) 2002 Fiscal 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003
---- ----------- ---- ---- ---- ----
Cash Non Cash Cash Non Cash
---- -------- ---- --------
Employee severance costs ........................ $ 126 $1,872 $ 815 $ -- $ 330 $ --
Lease commitments ............................... 3,139 3,134 416 -- 416 --
Asset impairment charges ........................ 94 318 -- 15 -- --
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----------
Total ......................................... $3,359 $5,324 $1,231 $ 15 $ 746 $ --
====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ===========
Amounts Amounts Amounts Amounts
Utilized Utilized Utilized Utilized Balance
Q3 Fiscal Q3 Fiscal Q4 Fiscal Q4 Fiscal June 30,
(in thousands) 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Cash Non Cash Cash Non Cash
---- -------- ---- --------
Employee severance costs ..................... $ 524 $ -- $ 145 $ -- $ 184
Lease commitments ............................ 430 (185) 1,875 -- 3,321
Asset impairment charges ..................... -- 253 95 49 --
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total ...................................... $ 954 $ 68 $2,115 $ 49 $3,505
====== ====== ====== ====== ======
In addition, in March 2003, the Company revised its estimate of the costs to
consolidate its French and German offices and as a result, the restructuring
charges in the three months ended March 29, 2003 includes a reversal of $185,000
in previously established amounts. At June 30, 2003, the restructuring accrual
balance of $3.5 million is comprised entirely of cash charges that are expected
to be paid over the next ten quarters, primarily against non-cancelable lease
commitments.
4. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Under SFAS 142, goodwill (and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives)
are longer amortized but are subject to annual impairment tests. Other
intangible assets with finite lives are amortized over those useful lives. Adept
implemented SFAS 142 on July 1, 2001 and completed the measurement of the
impairment loss in the third quarter of fiscal 2002. An impairment loss of $10.0
million resulting from the adoption of SFAS 142 was recorded as a cumulative
effect of a change in accounting principle as of July 1, 2001. SFAS 142 requires
goodwill and intangible assets to be evaluated for impairment at least annually
and we have chosen April 1, as the annual date to conduct this evaluation. In
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002, Adept recorded an impairment loss of $6.6
million as a component of operating expenses as a result of the annual
impairment update. The results of the Company's fiscal 2003 annual impairment
testing did not indicate impairment of the Company's goodwill. The impairment
charges are determined using a fair value approach, using the discounted cash
flow method.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 142, amortization expense was recorded for
goodwill and other intangible assets. The following sets forth a reconciliation
of net loss and loss per share information for the fiscal years 2003, 2002and
2001 adjusted for the non-amortization provisions of SFAS 142.
Fiscal year ended
----------------------------------------------------
(in thousands) June 30, 2003 June 30, 2002 June 30, 2001
------------- ------------- -------------
Net loss before cumulative effect of change
in accounting principle ............................................. $(28,972) $(49,851) $(35,200)
Add back goodwill amortization ......................................... -- -- 6,097
-------- -------- --------
Adjusted net income .................................................... $(28,972) $(49,851) $(29,103)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle .................... -- (9,973) --
-------- -------- --------
Net loss after cumulative effect of change
In accounting principle ............................................. $(28,972) $(59,824) $(29,103)
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic ............................................................... 14,955 13,691 11,637
======== ======== ========
Diluted ............................................................. 14,955 13,691 11,637
======== ======== ========
Basic and diluted earnings per common share:
Reported loss before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle ....................................... $ (1.94) $ (3.64) $ (3.02)
Add back goodwill amortization ......................................... -- -- 0.52
-------- -------- --------
Adjusted loss before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle ....................................... $ (1.94) $ (3.64) $ (2.50)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle ............................................................ -- (0.73) --
-------- -------- --------
Adjusted net loss ...................................................... $ (1.94) $ (4.37) $ (2.50)
======== ======== ========
79
In accordance with SFAS 142, the following is a summary of the gross carrying
amount and accumulated amortization, aggregate amortization expense, and
estimated amortization expense for the next five succeeding fiscal years related
to the intangible assets subject to amortization.
(in thousands) June 30, 2003 June 30, 2002
---------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------
Gross Net Gross Net
Carrying Accumulated Carrying Carrying Accumulated Carrying
Amortized intangible assets Amount Amortization Amount Amount Amortization Amount
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
(in thousands)
Developed technology ............. $ 2,532 $(1,443) $ 1,089 $ 1,751 $ (809) $ 942
Non compete agreements ........... 380 (293) 87 380 (198) 182
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total ............................ $ 2,912 $(1,736) $ 1,176 $ 2,131 $(1,007) $ 1,124
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
The aggregate amortization expense totaled $728,000 for the year ended June 30,
2003 and $725,000 for the year ended June 30, 2002 and the estimated
amortization expense for the next four years are as follows:
(in thousands) Amount
-------
For fiscal year 2004 682
For fiscal year 2005 267
For fiscal year 2006 195
For fiscal year 2007 32
------
$1,176
======
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the year ended June 30, 2003
are as follows:
(in thousands) Components Solutions Totals
---------- --------- ------
Balance at June 30, 2002 $ 2,394 $ 4,495 $ 6,889
Addition to goodwill for the acquisition of Meta (Note 2) 782 -- 782
----------- ---------- ----------
Balance at June 30, 2003 $ 3,176 $ 4,495 $ 7,671
========== ========== ==========
There is no goodwill related to the Services and Support segment.
5. Derivative Financial Instruments
A foreign currency hedging program was used to hedge the Company's exposure to
foreign currency exchange risk on international operational assets and
liabilities. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on forward currency
contracts that were effective as hedges of assets and liabilities were
recognized in income as a component of selling, general and administrative
expenses. The Company recognized losses of $271,000 for the year ended June 30,
2003 and $728,000 for the year ended June 30, 2002 and a gain of $322,000 for
the year ended June 30, 2001. As of March 2003, the Company determined that its
international activities held or conducted in foreign currency did not warrant
the cost associated with a hedging program due to decreased exposure of foreign
currency exchange risk on international operational assets and liabilities. As a
result, the Company suspended its foreign currency hedging program in March
2003.
80
6. Financing Arrangements
On August 30, 2002, in connection with the Meta acquisition, the Company assumed
a $500,000 revolving line of credit with Meta's lender, Paragon Commercial Bank
bearing interest at 1% plus the prime rate announced by the Wall Street Journal.
Of this line of credit, $494,000 was outstanding at the time of acquisition. The
credit facility was secured by a $500,000 cash deposit with Paragon Commercial
Bank. On March 10, 2003, the Company terminated the $500,000 line of credit with
Paragon Commercial Bank and paid the outstanding balance with the funds used to
secure the line of credit. Additionally, the Company entered into a loan
agreement for up to $800,000 with a former shareholder of Meta and issued into
escrow for the benefit of the lender 100,000 shares of the Company's common
stock valued at $113,000, subject to certain cancellation rights. In March 2003,
the Company and the former shareholder terminated the $800,000 loan agreement
and the Company cancelled the 100,000 shares. No amounts were ever borrowed
under the loan agreement.
Pursuant to the terms of the CHAD acquisition agreement, the Company paid $2.6
million to the shareholders of CHAD on October 9, 2002. On December 13, 2002,
CHAD and Adept amended the second anniversary promissory note due to a former
shareholder of CHAD and the funds then held in escrow in the amount of the $1.6
million promissory note were released to Adept. The second anniversary
promissory note was paid in full in February 2003.
On March 21, 2003, the Company and Silicon Valley Bank ("SVB") entered into an
Accounts Receivable Purchase Agreement (the "Purchase Agreement"). Under the
Purchase Agreement, the Company may sell certain of its receivables to SVB on a
full recourse basis for an amount equal to 70% of the face amount of such
purchased receivables with the aggregate face amount of purchased receivables
not to exceed $2.5 million. In connection with the Purchase Agreement, the
Company granted to SVB a security interest in substantially all of its assets.
Additionally, the Company issued Silicon Valley Bank a warrant to purchase
100,000 shares of Adept's common stock at a price of $1.00 per share. The
warrant may be exercised on or after September 21, 2003, expires March 21, 2008
and was valued at $20,000 by the Company using the Black Scholes model. As of
June 30, 2003, the Company had $97,000 outstanding under the Purchase Agreement.
The Purchase Agreement includes certain covenants with which the Company must
comply. The Company is required to pay a monthly finance charge equal to 2% of
the average daily gross amount of unpaid purchased receivables. The Company
cannot transfer or grant a security interest in its assets without SVB's
consent, except for certain ordinary course transactions, or make any transfers
to any of its subsidiaries of money or other assets with an aggregate value in
excess of $0.24 million in any fiscal quarter, net of any payments by such
subsidiaries to the Company. Certain of the Company's wholly-owned subsidiaries
were also required to execute a guaranty of all the Company's obligations to SVB
and such guaranties have been executed. Since the Company's obligation to repay
SVB is not conditioned on the collection of the related accounts receivable
balances, the Company has recorded the amounts due under this agreement in
current liabilities. Adept is required to meet certain covenants as defined by
the Purchase Agreement. Adept was in compliance with these covenants as of June
30, 2003.
On August 6, 2003, upon completion of the Company's lease restructuring with
Tri-Valley Campus LLC, Tri-Valley and the Company amended the lease relating to
the Company's Livermore, California facilities (See Note 7). In connection with
the lease restructuring, the Company issued a three-year, $3.0 million
convertible subordinated note due June 30, 2006 in favor of the landlord,
bearing an annual interest rate of 6.0%. Interest is payable at the Company's
option in shares of the Company's common stock. The note is convertible at any
time at the option of the holder into the Company's common stock at a conversion
price of $1.00 per share and the resulting shares carry certain registration and
other rights. This liability was recorded as long term Subordinated Convertible
Note in the accompanying balance sheet with a corresponding reduction in accrued
unpaid rent on Livermore facilities and an additional restructuring charge for
the excess of the note amount over accrued unpaid rent on Livermore facilities.
Payment under the note will be accelerated in the event of a default, including
the insolvency or bankruptcy of the Company, the Company's failure to pay its
obligations under the note when due, the Company's default on certain material
agreements, including the Livermore lease, the occurrence of a material adverse
change with respect to the Company's business or ability to pay its obligations
under the note, or a change of control of Adept without the landlord's consent.
81
7. Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments
Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases are as
follows:
(in thousands) Leases
------
Fiscal Year
2004...................................... $ 1,903
2005...................................... 1,760
2006...................................... 1,640
2007...................................... 1,399
2008...................................... 1,298
Thereafter................................ 3,742
---------
Total minimum lease payments................ $ 11,742
=========
Rent expense was $6.6 million in 2003. Rent expense in fiscal 2002 was $6.4
million. The Company did not record any sublease income during fiscal 2003 or
2002. Rent expense, net of sublease income of $16,000, was $4.1 million in 2001.
Rent payments for Livermore facilities increase at a rate of 4.0% annually on
June 1st of each year.
In connection with the restructuring of the Livermore facility lease, the lease
amendment carries liquidated damages in the event of default on the lease
payments equivalent to 1 year of rent obligations on the original lease. In the
event of Adept's bankruptcy or a failure to make payments to the landlord of the
Livermore, California facilities within three days after a written notice from
the landlord, a default would be triggered on the lease.
The Company had significant lease obligations for its California facilities. The
Company is currently in litigation with the landlord of its San Jose, California
facility regarding its outstanding lease obligations. The Company moved out of
its San Jose facility in March 2003 and no longer pays rent for that facility.
Contingencies
In March 2003, Adept vacated its San Jose facility and ceased paying rent on the
lease. In May 2003, DL Rose Orchard, L.P., owner of the property leased by Adept
at 150 Rose Orchard Way and 180 Rose Orchard Way in San Jose, California, filed
an action against Adept in Santa Clara Superior Court (NO. CV817195) alleging
that Adept breached the leases for the Rose Orchard Way properties by ceasing
rent payments and vacating the property. The complaint makes a claim for
unspecified damages for unpaid rent through April 2003, the worth at the time of
the award of rent through the balance of the leases, an award of all costs
necessary to ready the premises to be re-leased and payment of its costs and
attorney's fees. Adept answered the complaint on July 15, 2003 and is vigorously
defending the lawsuit. As the Company has vacated this facility, it has recorded
expense in the amount of $2.3 million for the remaining unpaid rent associated
with this lease; however, the Company has not set aside the cash associated with
such unpaid rent expenses, thus in the event that the Company receives an
adverse judgment in the San Jose lease litigation in excess of its cash balance
and does not have control of the timing of the payments, the Company may not
have sufficient cash to meet such obligations otherwise due and therefore, it
may be required to cease operations. Since filing the complaint, plaintiff has
disclosed in court filings that its estimated damages exceed $2.9 million.
Some end users of the Company's products have notified the Company that they
have received a claim of patent infringement from the Jerome H. Lemelson
Foundation, alleging that their use of the Company's machine vision products
infringes certain patents issued to Mr. Lemelson. In addition, the Company has
been notified that other end users of the Company's AdeptVision VME line and the
predecessor line of Multibus machine vision products have received letters from
Mr. Lemelson which refer to Mr. Lemelson's patent portfolio and offer the end
user a license to the particular patents. Certain end users have notified the
Company that they may seek indemnification from the Company for damages or
expenses resulting from this matter. The Company cannot predict the outcome of
this or any similar litigation, which may arise in the future. However, the
Company believes the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a
material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
The Company has from time to time received communications from third parties
asserting that the Company is infringing certain patents and other intellectual
property rights of others, or seeking indemnification against alleged
infringement. While it is not feasible to predict or determine the likelihood or
82
outcome of any actions brought against it, the Company believes the ultimate
resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on its
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
8. Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock
On October 29, 2001, Adept completed a private placement with JDS Uniphase
Corporation of $25.0 million of its convertible preferred stock consisting of
78,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (the "Series A Preferred")
and 22,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (the "Series B
Preferred"), collectively (the "Preferred Stock"). Both the Series A Preferred
and the Series B Preferred are entitled to annual dividends at a rate of $15 per
share. Dividends are cumulative, and accrued and unpaid dividends are payable
only in the event of certain liquidity events as defined in the statement of
preferences of the Preferred Stock, such as a change of control or liquidation
or dissolution of Adept. No dividends on its common stock may be paid until
dividends for the fiscal year and any prior years on the Preferred Stock have
been paid or set apart, and the Preferred Stock will participate in any
dividends paid to the common stock on an as-converted basis. The Preferred Stock
may be converted into shares of the Company's common stock at any time, and in
the absence of a liquidity event or earlier conversion or redemption, will be
converted into common stock upon October 29, 2004 (the "Automatic Conversion
Date"). The Company has agreed to use its reasonable efforts to seek shareholder
approval to extend this Automatic Conversion Date for the Preferred Stock until
October 29, 2005. The Preferred Stock may be converted into shares of Adept's
common stock at a rate of the initial purchase price divided by a denominator
equal to the lesser of $8.18, or 75% of the 30 day average closing price of
Adept's common stock immediately preceding the conversion date ("Conversion Date
Price"). However, as a result of a waiver of events of default by the preferred
stockholder other than in connection with certain liquidity events that are not
approved by the Board of Directors of Adept, in no event shall the denominator
for the determination of the conversion rate with respect to the Series B
Preferred be less than $4.09 and with respect to the Series A Preferred be less
than $2.05, even if the Conversion Date Price is less than $4.09 and $2.05,
respectively. With respect to the Series A Preferred, the conversion price could
potentially be less than the fair value of the common stock at the date the
preferred stock was issued. The resulting beneficial conversion amount, if any,
would be recorded as a preferred stock dividend and shown as a reduction in net
income applicable to common shareholders. The Preferred Stock shall not be
convertible, in the aggregate, into 20% or more of our outstanding voting
securities and no holder of Preferred Stock may convert shares of Preferred
Stock if, after the conversion, the holder will hold 20% or more of the
outstanding voting securities of Adept. Shares not permitted to be converted
remain outstanding, unless redeemed, and become convertible when such holder
holds less than 20% of Adept's outstanding voting securities. As a result, as
the number of outstanding shares of Adept increases, including as the result of
the exercise or conversion of options, warrants or convertible notes and as the
number of shares held by the preferred stockholder decreases, the number of
shares into which the preferred stock may be convertible proportionately
increases. The Preferred Stock has voting rights equal to the number of shares
into which the Preferred Stock could be converted subject to the terms of the
designation of preferences assuming a conversion rate of $250.00 divided by
$8.18.
Barring the occurrence of certain liquidity events that are not approved by the
Board of Directors of Adept, if the Conversion Date Price on the Automatic
Conversion Date is lower than $2.05, then the denominator for the calculation of
the conversion of the Preferred Stock described above will be $4.09 for the
Series B Preferred Stock and $2.05 for the Series A Preferred Stock. In
addition, because accrued and unpaid dividends are payable only in the event of
certain liquidity events as defined in the designation of preferences of the
Preferred Stock, as described above, barring the prior occurrence of such a
liquidity event, no cash dividends will be payable at the Automatic Conversion
Date.
The Company has the right, but not the obligation, to redeem shares of Series A
Preferred elected to be converted by the preferred stockholder which, upon
conversion would use the denominator of $2.05 for determination of the
conversion rate, and would result in the issuance of shares of common stock in
excess of the number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion using a
denominator of $4.09 for determination of the conversion rate. The number of
shares of Series A Preferred that Adept may elect to redeem would be calculated
by subtracting (i) the number of shares of common stock that the shares of
Series A Preferred that have been elected to be converted would be convertible
into based on a denominator of $4.09 from (ii) the number of shares of common
stock that the shares of Series A Preferred that have been elected to be
converted would be convertible into based on a denominator of $2.05, and then
determining the number of shares of Series A Preferred that this number of
shares of common stock represents using a denominator of $4.09. The redemption
price is equal to the sum of the initial Preferred Stock price, plus all
cumulated and unpaid dividends. The redemption shall be paid in the form of a
senior unsecured promissory note bearing interest at a rate of 6% per annum,
maturing in two years from the date of issuance. If the Company redeems shares
of Preferred Stock using a promissory note, any indebtedness incurred while the
83
note is outstanding must be subordinated to the note, other than certain
ordinary course financings. In addition, the holders of the Preferred Stock are
entitled to receive, upon liquidation, the amount equal to $250 per share
(adjusted for any stock splits or stock dividends) plus any unpaid dividends.
The liquidation preference may be triggered by several events consisting of a
change in control of Adept, a sale of substantially all of Adept's assets,
shareholder approval of any plan of liquidation or dissolution or the direct or
indirect beneficial ownership of more than 50% of Adept's common stock by any
person or entity. Since such events may be outside of management's control and
would trigger the payment of the Preferred Stock liquidation preference, the
Preferred Stock is classified outside of shareholders' equity as redeemable
convertible preferred stock in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
In December 2002, Adept and JDS Uniphase agreed to terminate the supply,
development and license agreement entered into by them in October 2001. Under
this agreement, Adept was obligated to work with JDS Uniphase's internal
automation organization, OPA, to develop solutions for component and module
manufacturing processes for sub-micron tolerance assemblies. JDS Uniphase
retained sole rights for fiberoptic applications developed under this contract.
For non-fiberoptic applications of component and module manufacturing processes
developed by OPA, Adept was obligated to pay up to $1.0 million each fiscal
quarter for the planned five-quarter effort. Due to changing economic and
business circumstances and the curtailment of development by JDS Uniphase and
shutdown of their OPA operations, both parties determined that these development
services were no longer in their mutual best interests. As part of the
termination, Adept executed a $1.0 million promissory note in favor of JDS
Uniphase earning interest at a rate of 7% per year payable on or before
September 30, 2004. JDS Uniphase has the right to require Adept to apply any
additional financing received prior to maturity first to repayment of the
outstanding balance under the promissory note. This right was waived by JDS
Uniphase in connection with the Company's line of credit with Silicon Valley
Bank and the convertible note issued by the Company to its landlord. In
addition, in the event of Adept's insolvency or inability to pay its debts when
they become due, an event of default occurs under the promissory note. An event
of default will result in the immediate acceleration of the promissory note and
the unpaid balance and all accrued interest will become immediately due and
payable. The payments made prior to termination plus the promissory note
represent payment in full by Adept for the development services performed by JDS
Uniphase, and there are no remaining payment obligations arising from the
agreement. All licenses, licensing rights and other rights and obligations
arising from the development work performed under the contract before
termination survive its termination. Adept also agreed to use its reasonable
efforts to seek shareholder approval to amend the date that the preferred stock
held by JDS Uniphase automatically converts into Adept's common stock from
October 29, 2004 to October 29, 2005 to allow JDS Uniphase an additional year to
maintain its position as a preferred stockholder or convert the Preferred Stock
into shares of Adept's common stock. The $1.0 million promissory note is
included in other long-term liabilities on the accompanying balance sheet.
9. Shareholders' Equity (Deficit)
Preferred Stock
The Board of Directors has the authority to issue, without further action by the
shareholders, up to 5.0 million shares of preferred stock in one or more series
and to fix the price, rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions thereof,
including dividend rights, dividend rates, conversion rights, voting rights,
terms of redemption, redemption prices, liquidation preferences and the number
of shares constituting a series or the designation of such series, without any
further vote or action by the Company's shareholders. The issuance of preferred
stock, while providing desirable flexibility in connection with possible
financings, acquisitions and other corporate purposes, could have the effect of
delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of the Company without
further action by the shareholders and may adversely affect the market price of,
and the voting and other rights of, the holders of common stock. This amount has
been reduced by 100,000 shares, which were issued as redeemable convertible
preferred stock in connection with a joint development agreement and related
investment of $25.0 million with an accredited investor, JDSU.
84
Common Stock
In August 2000, the Board of Directors amended the Company's Restated Articles
of Incorporation, approving an increase in the number of authorized shares of
its common stock from 25.0 million to 70.0 million shares. The shareholders
approved this amendment on November 10, 2000.
The Company has reserved shares of common stock for future issuance at June 30,
2003 as follows:
(in thousands)
Stock options outstanding..................................... 3,326
Stock options available for grant............................. 2,121
Conversion of redeemable convertible Preferred Stock ......... 3,063
Conversion of SVB warrant..................................... 100
Employee stock purchase plan shares available for purchase.... 826
-----
9,436
=====
Follow-on offering
On February 18, 2001, the Company completed a public offering of its common
stock. The Company sold a total of two million shares of common stock at a price
of $18.00 per share. The offering resulted in net proceeds to the Company of
approximately $32.4 million, net of an underwriting discount of $2.5 million and
offering expenses of $1.1 million.
Stock Option Plans
The Company's 1993 Stock Plan (the "1993 Plan") was adopted by the Board of
Directors in April 1993 and approved by the shareholders of the Company in June
1993. The 1993 Plan provides for grants of incentive stock options to employees
(including officers and employee directors) and nonstatutory stock options to
employees (including officers and employee directors) and consultants of the
Company. In general, options and common stock purchased pursuant to stock
purchase rights granted under the 1993 Plan vest and become exercisable starting
one year after the date of grant, with 25% of the shares subject to the option
exercisable at that time and an additional 1/48th of the shares subject to the
option becoming exercisable each month thereafter. Upon the voluntary or
involuntary termination of employment (including as a result of death or
disability) by a holder of unvested shares of the Company's common stock
purchased pursuant to stock purchase rights granted under the 1993 Plan, the
Company may exercise an option to repurchase such shares at their original issue
price. The terms of the options granted under the 1993 Plan generally may not
exceed ten years. The Board of Directors determines the exercise price of the
options, which must be at least equal to the fair market value of the common
stock on the date of grant.
On August 12, 1999, the Board of Directors authorized an increase of one million
shares issuable under the 1993 Plan, which was approved by the shareholders in
November 1999. In August 2000, the 1993 Plan was amended by the Board of
Directors to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance under the
1993 Plan by an additional one million shares. This amendment was approved by
the Company's shareholders on November 10, 2000. The 1993 Plan expired in April
2003. Therefore, no new options will be granted under the 1993 Plan.
The Company's 1995 Director Option Plan (the "Director Plan") was adopted by the
Board of Directors and approved by the shareholders of the Company in October
1995. The option grants under the Director Plan are automatic and
nondiscretionary, and the exercise price of the options is at the fair market
value of the Company's common stock on the date of grant. A total of 150,000
shares of common stock has been reserved for issuance under the Director Plan.
During the year ended June 30, 2003, 9,000 options were granted and no options
were exercised. During each of the two years ended June 30, 2002, 12,000 options
were granted and no options were exercised.
The options may be exercised at the time or times determined by the Board of
Directors.
On August 9, 2001, the Board of Directors adopted the 2001 Stock Option Plan
(the "2001 Plan") and provided that 2,600,000 shares of common stock be reserved
for issuance under the 2001 Plan. Options under the 2001 Plan may be granted, as
complies with applicable law, to employees either from time to time at the
discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors or
automatically upon the occurrence of specified events, including, without
85
limitation, reduction of at will employees' salaries and the achievement of
performance goals. The exercise price of the options is at the fair market value
of the Company's common stock on the date of the grant. Options generally vest
over a time period specified by the Compensation Committee. However, at the
Compensation Committee's discretion, options granted for reduction of at will
employees' salaries will vest in equal monthly increments over the salary
reduction period. All stock options granted under the 2001 Plan have an
expiration date of 10 years from the date of the grant.
The following table summarizes option activities under the Company's stock
option plans:
Options
---------------------------------------------------------------
Available No. of Shares Aggregate Weighted Average
for Grant Outstanding Price Exercise Price
--------- ----------- ----- --------------
(in thousands, except per share data)
Balance at June 30, 2000 ..................... 966 1,744 $ 12,477 $ 7.15
===== ===== ========
Additional shares authorized ............... 1,000 -- -- --
Granted .................................... (844) 844 16,285 19.29
Canceled ................................... 122 (122) (2,584) 21.18
Exercised .................................. -- (252) (1,370) 5.44
----- ----- --------
Balance at June 30, 2001 ..................... 1,244 2,214 $ 24,808 $11.21
===== ===== ========
Additional shares authorized ............... 2,600 -- -- --
Granted .................................... (1,619) 1,619 5,852 3.61
Canceled ................................... 463 (463) (4,594) 9.92
Exercised .................................. -- (32) (120) 3.74
----- ----- --------
Balance at June 30, 2002 ..................... 2,688 3,338 $ 25,946 $ 7.77
===== ===== ========
Additional shares authorized ............... -- -- -- --
Granted .................................... (974) 974 386 0.40
Canceled ................................... 986 (986) (7,574) 7.69
Exercised .................................. -- -- -- --
Expired .................................... (579) -- -- --
----- ----- --------
Balance at June 30, 2003 ..................... 2,121 3,326 $ 18,758 $ 5.64
===== ===== ========
The following table summarizes information concerning outstanding and
exercisable options at June 30, 2003:
Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
---------------------------------------- ---------------------------
Weighted
Average Weighted Weighted
Remaining Average Average
Range of Exercise Options Contractual Exercise Options Exercise
Prices Outstanding Life Price Exercisable Price
------ ----------- ---- ----- ----------- -----
$ 0.30 - $ 1.90 910,652 9.73 $ 0.34 326,135 $ 0.32
$ 2.79 - $ 2.84 348,352 8.84 $ 2.79 93,445 $ 2.79
$ 3.26 - $ 4.64 712,612 8.08 $ 3.69 595,049 $ 3.53
$ 5.56 - $ 7.00 703,637 5.35 $ 6.53 644,677 $ 6.49
$ 8.40 - $11.75 341,092 6.98 $ 9.36 222,481 $ 9.64
$13.25 - $23.75 284,707 7.00 $ 21.67 205,625 $ 21.55
$13.25 - $49.75 24,950 7.08 $ 36.97 18,033 $ 36.26
--------- ---------
$ 0.30 - $49.75 3,326,002 7.82 $ 5.65 2,105,445 $ 6.59
========= =========
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "1998 ESPP") has overlapping 12-month
offering periods that begin every six months, starting on the first trading day
on or after September 1 and March 1 of each year. Each 12-month offering period
is divided into two six-month purchase periods. For every six-month purchase
period, the plan allows eligible employees, through payroll deductions, to
purchase a maximum of 3000 shares of the Company's common stock at 85% of fair
market value on either the first day of the offering period or the last day of
the purchase period, whichever is lower.
86
In April 2003, as a result of the delisting of the Company's stock from the
Nasdaq National Market and the resulting additional cost and administrative
requirements of maintaining its 1998 ESPP, the Board of Directors suspended
offering periods until a further determination is made to recommence offering
periods under the ESPP.
10. Employee Savings and Investment Plan
The Company maintains a 401(k) savings and investment plan in which employees
are eligible to participate. The Company suspended its 401(k) matching
contributions to reduce costs beginning in January 2002. The Company's matching
contributions were $0, $255,000 and $600,000 for fiscal years 2003, 2002 and
2001, respectively.
11. Income Taxes
The provision for (benefit from) income taxes consists of the following:
(in thousands) Year Ended June 30,
--------------------------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
------- ------- -------
Current:
Federal ........................................ $ -- $ -- $ --
State .......................................... 25 -- --
Foreign ........................................ 6 243 425
------- ------- -------
Total current .................................... 31 243 425
Deferred:
Federal ........................................ -- (3,601) 4,033
State .......................................... -- -- 938
------- ------- -------
Total deferred ................................... 31 (3,601) 4,971
------- ------- -------
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes ........ $ 31 $(3,358) $ 5,396
======= ======= =======
The difference between the provision for (benefit from) income taxes and the
amount computed by applying the federal statutory income tax rate to (loss)
income before provision for (benefit from) income taxes is explained below:
(in thousands) Year Ended June 30,
--------------------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
-------- -------- --------
Tax at federal statutory rate ........................................ $ (9,840) $(21,487) $(10,133)
State taxes, net of federal benefit .................................. (557) (1,248) (1,387)
Expired operating net losses ......................................... 94 -- --
Foreign taxes ........................................................ 303 502 436
Tax credits .......................................................... (1,282) 129 (1,082)
Goodwill impairment .................................................. -- 5,547 1,373
Non-deductible meals, entertainment and political contributions ...... 21 124 65
Change in valuation allowance ........................................ 11,423 13,025 16,179
Other ................................................................ (131) 50 (55)
-------- -------- --------
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes ............................ $ 31 $ (3,358) $ 5,396
======== ======== ========
87
Significant components of the Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities are
as follows:
(in thousands) June 30,
-----------------------
2003 2002
-------- --------
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carryforwards ................................. $ 25,988 $ 16,318
Tax credit carryforwards ......................................... 6,229 4,910
Inventory valuation accounts ..................................... 2,005 2,337
Warranty accruals ................................................ 630 603
Depreciation /amortization ....................................... 498 2,031
Other accruals not currently deductible for tax purposes ......... 1,101 2,575
Capitalized research and development expenses .................... 2,133 1,944
Restructuring charges ............................................ 4,901 1,338
Other ............................................................ 225 192
-------- --------
Total deferred tax assets ........................................ 43,710 32,248
Valuation allowance .............................................. (43,242) (31,819)
-------- --------
Net deferred tax assets .......................................... 468 429
-------- --------
Deferred tax liabilities:
Purchased intangibles ............................................ 468 (429)
-------- --------
Net deferred tax liabilities ..................................... 468 (429)
-------- --------
Total net deferred tax assets ........................................ $ -- $ --
======== ========
For financial reporting purposes, the Company's deferred tax assets have been
fully offset by a valuation allowance due to uncertainties about the Company's
ability to generate future taxable income. The change in the valuation allowance
was a net increase of approximately $11.4 million and $13.0 million in 2003 and
2002, respectively.
The accumulated tax benefits associated with employee stock options provide a
deferred benefit of approximately $933,000, which has been fully offset by the
valuation allowance. The deferred tax benefit associated with the employee stock
options will be credited to additional paid-in capital when realized.
At June 30, 2003, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards for federal
income tax purposes of approximately $73.1 million, which will expire in 2007
through 2023 if unused. The Company had net operating loss carryforwards for
state income tax purposes of approximately $40.4 million, which will expire in
2010 through 2013 if unused.
The Company also had credit carryforwards of approximately $4.2 million for
federal income tax purposes and $2 million for state income tax purposes. The
federal tax credit and a portion of the state tax credit will expire in 2008
through 2023 if unused. Approximately $1.8 of the state tax credit carries
forward indefinitely. The utilization of the net operating loss carryforwards
and tax credit carryforwards may be subject to IRC ss.382 limitation.
Pretax income (losses) from foreign operations was approximately ($806,000) in
2003, $452,000 in 2002, and ($754,000) in 2001.
12. Net Loss Per Share
Net loss per share is calculated as follows:
Year Ended June 30,
------------------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
-------- -------- --------
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Net loss before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle ............. $(28,972) $(49,851) $(35,200)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle ............................ $ -- $ (9,973) $ --
-------- -------- --------
Net loss after cumulative effect of change in accounting principle .............. $(28,972) $(59,824) $(35,200)
======== ======== ========
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic ...................................................................... 14,955 13,691 11,637
======== ======== ========
Diluted .................................................................... 14,955 13,691 11,637
======== ======== ========
Basic and diluted loss per common share:
Loss before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle ............ $ (1.94) $ (3.64) $ (3.02)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle ........................ -- (0.73) --
-------- -------- --------
Adjusted net loss .......................................................... $ (1.94) $ (4.37) $ (3.02)
======== ======== ========
88
If the Company had reported net income for the years ended June 30, 2003, 2002
or 2001, the calculation of diluted net income per share would have included
additional common equivalent shares of approximately 230,000, 515,000 and
1,963,000, respectively, relating to outstanding employee stock options not
included above (determined using the treasury stock method).
13. Segment Information
The Company completed several acquisitions over the past few years. Evolution of
the business resulting partially from these acquisitions combined with the
changing business environment has rendered the Company's previously reported
business segments less meaningful. As such, effective July 1, 2002, the
previously reported segments, Assembly and Material Handling ("AMH"),
Semiconductor, and SILMA Software segments were reorganized into three new
business segments to reflect how management currently measures the Company's
businesses: Components, Solutions, and Services and Support. Of the previously
reported segments, Semiconductor's business was reorganized into separate
businesses that are now categorized in both Components and Solutions.
Additionally, the AMH and SILMA businesses are now categorized in the Components
segment. Service and support for all of our products are now categorized in the
Services and Support segment.
The Components segment provides intelligent automation software and hardware
component products externally to customers and internally to the other two
business segments for support and integration into higher level assemblies.
The Solutions segment takes products purchased from the Components segment
together with materials from third parties, and produces an integrated family of
process ready platforms for the semiconductor, electronics and precision
assembly and other markets, which are driven towards standard offerings.
The Services and Support segment provides support services to our customers
including providing information regarding the use of our automation equipment,
assisting with the ongoing support of installed systems, consulting services for
applications, and training courses ranging from system operation and maintenance
to advanced programming geared for manufacturing engineers who design and
implement automation lines.
The Company evaluates performance and allocates resources based on segment
revenues and segment operating (loss) income. Segment operating (loss) income is
comprised of income before unallocated research and development expenses,
unallocated selling, general and administrative expenses, interest income, and
interest and other expenses.
Management does not fully allocate research and development expenses and
selling, general and administrative expenses when making capital spending and
expense funding decisions or assessing segment performance. There is no
inter-segment revenue recognized. Transfers between segments are recorded at
cost.
Segment information for total assets and capital expenditures is not presented
as such information is not used in measuring segment performance or allocating
resources among segments.
During fiscal 2003, the Company restructured the underlying processes in its
enterprise resource planning system to support the Company's functional
reorganization as described above. As part of this process, the Company
considered conforming prior year information to the current year presentation,
but the Company has determined that it is impracticable to restate information
for the fiscal year 2001. As such, only segment information for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2002 has been restated to conform to the current year
presentation and segment information for fiscal year 2001 has not been
presented.
89
Year ended June 30,
------------------------
(in thousands) 2003 2002
-------- --------
Revenue:
Component ...................................... $ 25,000 $ 37,051
Solutions ...................................... 6,602 7,418
Services and Support ........................... 13,214 12,570
-------- --------
Total revenue .................................. $ 44,816 $ 57,039
======== ========
Operating income (loss):
Components ..................................... $ (7,291) $ (3,323)
Solutions ...................................... (2,762) (5,702)
Services and Support ........................... 3,164 3,093
-------- --------
Segment loss ................................... (6,889) (5,932)
Unallocated research, development
and engineering and selling,
general and administrative .................. (16,091) (24,289)
Restructuring charges .......................... (5,324) (17,659)
Amortization of other intangibles .............. (728) (725)
Impairment of goodwill ......................... -- (6,608)
Gain on sale of assets ......................... -- 1,566
Interest income (expense) ...................... 91 438
-------- --------
Loss before income taxes and cumulative
effect of change in accounting principle ..... $(28,941) $(53,209)
======== ========
Management also assesses the Company's performance, operations and assets by
geographic areas, and therefore revenue and long-lived assets are summarized in
the following table:
(in thousands) Year Ended June 30,
----------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
-------- -------- --------
Revenue:
United States ..................... $ 27,692 $ 25,253 $ 63,896
Germany ........................... 3,393 7,682 10,523
France ............................ 5,555 11,731 12,445
Other European countries .......... 6,514 8,969 10,537
All other countries ............... 1,662 3,404 2,912
-------- -------- --------
$ 44,816 $ 57,039 $100,313
======== ======== ========
Long-lived assets:
United States ..................... $ 13,429 $ 15,812 $ 32,557
All other countries ............... 331 458 426
-------- -------- --------
Total long-lived assets ...... $ 13,760 $ 16,270 $ 32,983
======== ======== ========
No single customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company's net revenues in
fiscal 2003, 2002 or 2001.
14. Subsequent Events (unaudited)
In August 2003, Adept was granted a permit for the sale of securities under the
1998 ESPP in California. In September 2003, the Board of Directors reopened the
ESPP to participation by employees effective for a 12 month offering subject to
compliance with applicable federal and state securities laws, including the
California state permit.
90
SCHEDULE II
ADEPT TECHNOLOGY, INC.
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(in thousands)
Balance Additions
at Charged to Balance
Beginning Costs and at End
Description of Period Expenses Deductions (1) of Period
----------- --------- -------- -------------- ---------
Year ended June 30, 2001:
Allowance for doubtful accounts $ 637 $ 214 $(109) $ 742
Year ended June 30, 2002:
Allowance for doubtful accounts 742 319 (229) 832
Year ended June 30, 2003:
Allowance for doubtful accounts 832 367 (75) 1,124
(1) Includes write offs net of recoveries.
91