Back to GetFilings.com
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
[X] ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004.
Commission File No. 000-31170
TETON PETROLEUM COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 1482290
(State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
1600 Broadway, Suite 2400
Denver, Co. 80202 - 4921
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrant's telephone number: 303.542.1878
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
Title of Class Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
-------------- -----------------------------------------
Common Stock American Stock Exchange
Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such
reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days. YES [X] NO [ ]
Indicate by a check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K (ss.229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will
not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ X ]
Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). YES [ ] NO [X]
The issuer's revenue for its most recent fiscal year was $0
As of June 30, 2004, approximately 9,114,663 shares of common stock were
outstanding. The aggregate market value of the common stock held by
non-affiliates of the issuer, as of June 30, 2004, was approximately $21,060,742
based on the closing bid of $2.45 for the issuer's common stock as reported on
the American Stock Exchange. Shares of common stock held by each director, each
officer named in Item 12, and each person who owns 10% or more of the
outstanding common stock have been excluded from this calculation in that such
persons may be deemed to be affiliates. The determination of affiliate status is
not necessarily conclusive.
As of March 10, 2005 the issuer had 9,741,773 shares of common stock
outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE - NONE
FORM 10-K
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004
INDEX
PART I
Item 1. Business
Item 2. Properties
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
Item 6 Selected Financial Data
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Item 9B Other Information
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
and Related Stockholder Matters
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
SIGNATURES
PART I
Caution Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
We have included in this report, statements which are intended as
"forward-looking statements" under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995. These include statements that are not simply a statement of historical
fact but describe what we "believe," "anticipate," or "expect" will occur. We
caution you not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements made
in this report. Although we believe these statements are reasonable, there are
many factors, which may affect our expectation of our operations. These factors
include, among other things, the following:
o general economic conditions
o the market price of, and demand for, oil and natural gas
o our ability to service future indebtedness
o our ability to raise additional equity capital, obtain debt financing, or generate
sufficient revenues to fund our operating and development plan
o our success in completing development and exploration activities
o expansion and other development trends of the oil and gas industry
o our present company structure
o our accumulated deficit
o acquisitions and other business opportunities that may be presented to and pursued by
us
o our ability to integrate our acquisitions into our company structure
o changes in laws and regulations
Summary
Until July 16, 2004 Teton Petroleum Company ("Teton," the "Company," "We" or
"Us") through a consolidated Russian subsidiary ZAO Goloil ("Goloil"), was
primarily engaged in oil and gas exploration, development, and production in
Western Siberia, Russia.
For the first six months of 2004 Teton's efforts were concentrated on
negotiating and finalizing the sale of Goloil.
Effective July 1, 2004, for accounting purposes, Teton sold its interest in
Goloil and recorded a gain of $13,087,000.
Since the sale of Goloil the Company has focused on evaluating potential
acquisitions of oil and gas properties located in the United States, Russia and
the Commonwealth of Independent States.
During December 2004 the Company entered into a binding letter of intent and
subsequent to year-end entered into a formal contract to acquire up to 180,000
acres of oil and gas leases in a significant block of acreage in North America,
subject to the completion of due diligence and other conditions. See subsequent
events on page 19.
On February 15, 2005, in a second transaction, the Company purchased 25% of the
membership interest of Piceance Gas Resources, LLC, a Limited Liability Company
whose primary asset is oil and gas rights and leasehold assets covering
approximately 6,300 acres in the Piceance Basin of Western Colorado. See
subsequent events on page 19.
Item 1. BUSINESS.
Background
The Company is an independent energy company engaged primarily in the
development, production and marketing of natural gas and oil in North America.
We intend to increase stockholder value by profitably growing reserves and
production, primarily through drilling operations. We seek high quality
exploration and development projects with potential for providing long-term
drilling inventories that generate high returns. The Company's current
operations are focused in the Rocky Mountain Region of the United States. From
its inception until 2004, the Company was primarily engaged in oil and gas
exploration, development, and production in Western Siberia, Russia. In July
2004, the Company's shareholders voted to sell its Russian operations to the
Company's Russian partner. The sale, which was deemed effective as of July 1,
2004, for accounting purposes, resulted in our reporting a gain of $13,087,000.
The purchase price for our 35.30% interest in Goloil was $8,960,000 in cash,
which was received during August 2004. Goloil also repaid advances made by the
Company to Goloil totaling $6,040,000. The advances were made to Goloil by the
Company to finance our 50% share of Goloil's capital expenditures and currently
bore interest at the rate of 8% per annum. The gross proceeds of the two
transactions to the Company totaled $15,000,000.
Between July 2004 and January 2005 the Company actively pursued
opportunities in North America and abroad in order to redeploy the cash
generated in the sale of its Goloil asset. In December 2004 and again in January
2005, the Company reported the signing of a binding letter of intent and
definitive purchase agreement, respectively, for up to 180,000 acres located in
North America. The Company made an additional purchase in February 2005 of a 25%
interest in Piceance Gas Resources, LLC ("PGR") which owns approximately 6,300
acres in the Piceance Basin, located northwest of the Grand Valley Field in
Western Colorado. The purchase price of the 25% interest is $5.25 million cash
and 450,000 unregistered shares of Teton common stock. Teton also issued PGR
Partners, LLC warrants to purchase 200,000 shares of Teton common stock at an
exercise price of $2.00 per share, exercisable for five years. Please read
Subsequent Events on Page 19.
Available Information
The Company's Internet address is www.tetonpetroleum.com. Electronic copies
of the Company's annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and
current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports are available free
of charge by visiting the "Financials" section of www.tetonpetroleum.com. These
reports are posted as soon as reasonably practicable after they are
electronically filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Additional
information including the Company's Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is also
available on our website.
Business Strategy
The Company's objective is to expand its natural gas and oil reserves,
production and revenues through a strategy that includes the following key
elements:
Initiate drilling operations. With the acquisition of the Piceance acreage, the
Company intends to initiate drilling operations beginning in the second quarter
of 2005. PGR's business plan for 2005 includes drilling a minimum of eight
wells. PGR is the operator of record in our Piceance Basin Project. Teton owns a
25% interest in PGR. Teton may operate in other areas. The Company understands
that there is significant competition for the acquisition of producing
properties and therefore growing the Company through drilling opportunities is
also essential. Acquire producing properties. The Company's acquisition efforts
are focused on properties that fit well within existing operations or in areas
where the Company is establishing new operations or where it believes that a
base of existing production will produce an adequate foundation for economies of
scale necessary to grow a business within a geography or business segment.
Pursue geographic expansion. The Company and its key executives have operated
both within the United States and internationally. The Company believes that its
international experience provides it with a significant competitive edge
relative to similarly situated organizations that tend to remain localized in
their operations and focus. The Company believes that geographic diversification
provides the ultimate hedge to being able operate an energy concern during the
peaks and troughs of the energy business cycle.
Reduce risks inherent in oil and natural gas development and marketing. An
integral part of the Company's strategy has been and will continue to be to
concentrate on development drilling and/or the drilling of exploratory step out
wells that are inherently less risky than drilling wild cat wells.
Pursuit of Selective Complementary Acquisitions. We seek to acquire long-lived
producing properties with a high degree of operating control, or operators that
are known to be competent in the area, that contain opportunities to profitably
increase natural gas and crude oil reserves booked by the Company.
Our 2005 strategy is to focus on a disciplined approach to investment that
balances our drilling effort between exploration opportunities and the
development program, along with complimentary acquisition opportunities.
The preceding paragraphs, discussing our strategic pursuits and goals, contain
forward-looking information. There can be no assurance that we will be
successful in carrying out our business strategy or that our strategy will not
change as we evaluate and pursue our business strategy.
Governmental Regulation
The Company's business and the natural gas industry in general are heavily
regulated. The availability of a ready market for natural gas production depends
on several factors beyond the Company's control. These factors include
regulation of natural gas production, federal and state regulations governing
environmental quality and pollution control, the amount of natural gas available
for sale, the availability of adequate pipeline and other transportation and
processing facilities and the marketing of competitive fuels. State and federal
regulations generally are intended to prevent waste of natural gas, protect
rights to produce natural gas between owners in a common reservoir and control
contamination of the environment. Pipelines are subject to the jurisdiction of
various federal, state, and local agencies.
The Company believes that it is in substantial compliance with such statutes,
rules, regulations and governmental orders, although there can be no assurance
that this is or will remain the case. Failure to comply with such laws and
regulations can result in substantial penalties. The regulatory burden on the
industry increases our cost of doing business and affects our profitability.
Although we believe we are in substantial compliance with all applicable laws
and regulations, such laws and regulations are frequently amended or
reinterpreted so we are unable to predict the future cost or impact of complying
with such laws and regulations.
The following discussion of the regulation of the United States natural gas
industry is not intended to constitute a complete discussion of the various
statutes, rules, regulations and environmental orders to which the Company's
operations may be subject.
Regulation of Oil and Natural Gas Exploration and Production
The Company's oil and natural gas operations are subject to various types of
regulation at the federal, state and local levels. Prior to commencing drilling
activities for a well, the Company (or its operating subsidiaries, operating
entities or operating partners) must procure permits and/or approvals for the
various stages of the drilling process from the applicable state and local
agencies in the state in which the area to be drilled is located. Such permits
and approvals include those for the drilling of wells, and such regulation
includes maintaining bonding requirements in order to drill or operate wells and
regulating the location of wells, the method of drilling and casing wells, the
surface use and restoration of properties on which wells are drilled, the
plugging and abandoning of wells and the disposal of fluids used in connection
with operations. The Company's operations are also subject to various
conservation laws and regulations. These include the regulation of the size of
drilling and spacing units or proration units and the density of wells which may
be drilled and the unitization or pooling of natural gas properties. In this
regard, some states allow the forced pooling or integration of tracts to
facilitate exploration while other states rely primarily or exclusively on
voluntary pooling of lands and leases. In areas where pooling is voluntary, it
may be more difficult to form units, and therefore, more difficult to develop a
project if the operator owns less than 100% of the leasehold. In addition, state
conservation laws may establish maximum rates of production from oil and natural
gas wells, generally prohibit the venting or flaring of natural gas and impose
certain requirements regarding the ratability of production.
The effect of these regulations may limit the amount of oil and natural gas the
Company can produce from its wells and may limit the number of wells or the
locations at which the Company can drill. The regulatory burden on the oil and
natural gas industry increases the Company's costs of doing business and,
consequently, affects its profitability. Inasmuch as such laws and regulations
are frequently expanded, amended and reinterpreted, the Company is unable to
predict the future cost or impact of complying with such regulations.
Natural Gas Marketing, Gathering, and Transportation
Federal legislation and regulatory controls have historically affected the
price of the natural gas and the manner in which production is transported and
marketed. Under the Natural Gas Act of 1938, the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission ("FERC") regulates the interstate sale for resale of natural gas and
the transportation of natural gas in interstate commerce, although facilities
used in the production or gathering of natural gas in interstate commerce are
generally exempted from FERC jurisdiction. Effective January 1, 1993, the
Natural Gas Wellhead Decontrol Act deregulated natural gas prices for all "first
sales" of natural gas, which definition covers all sales of our own production.
In addition, as part of the broad industry restructuring initiatives described
below, the FERC has granted to all producers such as us a "blanket certificate
of public convenience and necessity" authorizing the sale of gas for resale
without further FERC approvals. As a result, all natural gas that we produce in
the future may now be sold at market prices, subject to the terms of any private
contracts that may be in effect.
Natural gas sales prices nevertheless continue to be affected by intrastate
and interstate gas transportation regulation, because the prices that companies
such as ours receive for our production are affected by the cost of transporting
the gas to the consuming market. Through a series of comprehensive rulemakings,
beginning with Order No.436 in 1985 and continuing through Order No.636 in 1992
and Order No.637 in 2000, the FERC has adopted regulatory changes that have
significantly altered the transportation and marketing of natural gas. These
changes were intended by the FERC to foster competition by, among other things,
transforming the role of interstate pipeline companies from wholesale marketers
of gas to the primary role of gas transporters, and by increasing the
transparency of pricing for pipeline services. The FERC has also developed rules
governing the relationship of the pipelines with their marketing affiliates, and
implemented standards relating to the use of electronic data exchange by the
pipelines to make transportation information available on a timely basis and to
enable transactions to occur on a purely electronic basis.
In light of these statutory and regulatory changes, most pipelines have
divested their gas sales functions to marketing affiliates, which operate
separately from the transporter and in direct competition with all other
merchants, and most pipelines have also implemented the large-scale divestiture
of their gas gathering facilities to affiliated or non-affiliated companies.
Interstate pipelines thus now generally provide unbundled, open and
nondiscriminatory transportation and transportation-related services to
producers, gas marketing companies, local distribution companies, industrial end
users and other customers seeking such services. Sellers and buyers of gas have
gained direct access to the particular pipeline services they need, and are
better able to conduct business with a larger number of counterparties.
Environmental Regulations
The Company's operations are subject to numerous laws and regulations
governing the discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise relating
to environmental protection. Public interest in the protection of the
environment has increased dramatically in recent years. The trend of more
expansive and stricter environmental legislation and regulations could continue.
To the extent laws are enacted or other governmental action is taken that
restricts drilling or imposes environmental protection requirements that result
in increased costs to the natural gas industry in general, the business and
prospects of the Company could be adversely affected.
The nature of the Company business operations results in the generation of
wastes that may be subject to the Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
("RCRA") and comparable state statutes. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
("EPA") and various state agencies have limited the approved methods of disposal
for certain hazardous and nonhazardous wastes. Furthermore, certain wastes
generated by the Company's operations that are currently exempt from treatment
as "hazardous wastes" may in the future be designated as "hazardous wastes," and
therefore be subject to more rigorous and costly operating and disposal
requirements.
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act
("CERCLA"), also known as the "Superfund" law, imposes liability, without regard
to fault or the legality of the original conduct, on certain classes of persons
who are considered to be responsible for the release of a "hazardous substance"
into the environment. These persons include the present or past owners or
operators of the disposal site or sites where the release occurred and the
companies that transported or arranged for the disposal of the hazardous
substances at the site where the release occurred. Under CERCLA, such persons
may be subject to joint and several liabilities for the costs of cleaning up the
hazardous substances that have been released into the environment, for damages
to natural resources and for the costs of certain health studies. It is not
uncommon for neighboring landowners and other third parties to file claims for
personal injury and property damages allegedly caused by the release of
hazardous substances or other pollutants into the environment. Furthermore,
although petroleum, including natural gas and crude oil, is exempt from CERCLA,
at least two courts have ruled that certain wastes associated with the
production of crude oil may be classified as "hazardous substances" under CERCLA
and thus such wastes may become subject to liability and regulation under
CERCLA. State initiatives to further regulate the disposal of crude oil and
natural gas wastes are also pending in certain states, and these various
initiatives could have adverse impacts on our business.
Stricter standards in environmental legislation may be imposed on the
industry in the future. For instance, legislation has been proposed in Congress
from time to time that would reclassify certain exploration and production
wastes as "hazardous wastes" and make the reclassified wastes subject to more
stringent handling, disposal and clean-up restrictions. If such legislation were
to be enacted, it could have a significant impact on our operating costs, as
well as on the industry in general. Compliance with environmental requirements
generally could have a materially adverse effect upon our capital expenditures,
earnings or competitive position.
CERCLA and similar state laws impose liability, without regard to fault or
the legality of the original conduct, on certain classes of persons that are
considered to have contributed to the release of a "hazardous substance" into
the environment. These persons include the owner or operator of the disposal
site or sites where the release occurred and companies that disposed of or
arranged for the disposal of the hazardous substances found at the site. Persons
who are or were responsible for release of hazardous substances under CERCLA may
be subject to joint and several liability for the costs of cleaning up the
hazardous substances that have been released into the environment and for
damages to natural resources, and it is not uncommon for neighboring landowners
and other third parties to file claims for personal injury and property damage
allegedly caused by the hazardous substances released into the environment.
The Company's operations may be subject to the Clean Air Act ("CAA") and
comparable state and local requirements. Amendments to the CAA were adopted in
1990 and contain provisions that may result in the gradual imposition of certain
pollution control requirements with respect to air emissions from the operations
of the Company. The EPA and states have been developing regulations to implement
these requirements. The Company may be required to incur certain capital
expenditures in the next several years for air pollution control equipment in
connection with maintaining or obtaining operating permits and approvals
addressing other air emission-related issues.
The Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA or Clean Water Act) and
resulting regulations, which are implemented through a system of permits, also
govern the discharge of certain contaminants into waters of the United States.
Sanctions for failure to comply strictly with the Clean Water Act are generally
resolved by payment of fines and correction of any identified deficiencies.
However, regulatory agencies could require us to cease construction or operation
of certain facilities that are the source of water discharges.
Our operations are subject to local, state and federal laws and regulations
to control emissions from sources of air pollution. Payment of fines and
correction of any identified deficiencies generally resolve penalties for
failure to comply strictly with air regulations or permits. Regulatory agencies
could also require us to cease construction or operation of certain facilities
that are air emission sources. We believe that we substantially comply with the
emission standards under local, state, and federal laws and regulations.
Operating Hazards and Insurance
The Company's exploration and production operations include a variety of
operating risks, including the risk of fire, explosions, blowouts, craterings,
pipe failure, casing collapse, abnormally pressured formations, and
environmental hazards such as gas leaks, ruptures and discharges of toxic gas,
the occurrence of any of which could result in substantial losses to the Company
due to injury and loss of life, severe damage to and destruction of property,
natural resources and equipment, pollution and other environmental damage,
clean-up responsibilities, regulatory investigation and penalties and suspension
of operations. The Company's pipeline, gathering and distribution operations are
subject to the many hazards inherent in the natural gas industry. These hazards
include damage to wells, pipelines and other related equipment, and surrounding
properties caused by hurricanes, floods, fires and other acts of God,
inadvertent damage from construction equipment, leakage of natural gas and other
hydrocarbons, fires and explosions and other hazards that could also result in
personal injury and loss of life, pollution and suspension of operations.
Any significant problems related to its facilities could adversely affect
the Company's ability to conduct its operations. In accordance with customary
industry practice, the Company maintains insurance against some, but not all,
potential risks; however, there can be no assurance that such insurance will be
adequate to cover any losses or exposure for liability. The occurrence of a
significant event not fully insured against could materially adversely affect
the Company's operations and financial condition. The Company cannot predict
whether insurance will continue to be available at premium levels that justify
its purchase or whether insurance will be available at all. Competition
Competition in our primary producing areas is intense. Price, contract
terms and quality of service, including pipeline connection times, distribution
efficiencies and reliable delivery records, affect competition. In addition,
there is tremendous competition within the United States to assemble an
extensive acreage position, existing natural gas gathering and pipeline systems
and storage fields. We actively compete against other companies with
substantially larger financial and other resources.
The Company believes that its capabilities and the experience of its
management and professional staff generally enable it to compete effectively.
The Company encounters competition from numerous other oil and natural gas
companies, drilling and income programs and partnerships in all areas of its
operations, including drilling and marketing natural gas and obtaining desirable
natural gas leases. Many of these competitors possess larger staffs and greater
financial resources than the Company, which may enable them to identify and
acquire desirable producing properties and drilling prospects more economically.
The Company's ability to explore for oil and natural gas prospects and to
acquire additional properties in the future depends upon its ability to conduct
its operations, to evaluate and select suitable properties and to consummate
transactions in this highly competitive environment. The Company competes with a
number of other companies, which offer interests in drilling partnerships with a
wide range of investment objectives and program structures. Competition for
investment capital for both public and private drilling programs is intense. The
Company also faces intense competition in the marketing of natural gas from
competitors including other producers as well as marketing companies. Also,
international developments and the possible improved economics of domestic
natural gas exploration may influence other companies to increase their domestic
oil and natural gas exploration. Furthermore, competition among companies for
favorable prospects can be expected to continue, and it is anticipated that the
cost of acquiring properties may increase in the future. Factors affecting
competition in the natural gas industry include price, location, availability,
quality and volume of natural gas. The Company believes that it can compete
effectively in the oil and natural gas industry on each of the foregoing
factors. Nevertheless, the Company's business, financial condition or results of
operations could be materially adversely affected by competition.
Employees
As of December 31, 2004, the Company had 6 employees, and 3 part-time
consultants that dedicate over 25% of their time to the Company.
The Company's employees are not covered by a collective bargaining
agreement. The Company considers relations with its employees to be excellent.
Item 2. PROPERTIES.
Glossary of Oil and Gas Terms.
Barrel: Equal to 42 U.S. gallons.
Barrels of oil equivalent (BOE) - Gas volume that is expressed in terms of
its energy equivalent in barrels of oil, which is calculated as 6,000 cubic
feet of gas equals 1 barrel of oil equivalent (BOE); or 42 U.S. gallons of
oil at 40 degrees Fahrenheit.
Basin: A depressed sediment-filled area, roughly circular or elliptical in
shape, sometimes very elongated. Regarded as a good area to explore for oil
and gas.
BCF: One billion cubic feet of natural gas, or 1,000 mcf.
Field: A geographic region situated over one or more subsurface oil and gas
reservoirs encompassing at least the outermost boundaries of all oil and
gas accumulations known to be within those reservoirs vertically projected
to the land surface.
License: Formal or legal permission to explore for oil and gas in a
specified area.
MCF: One thousand cubic feet of natural gas. Natural gas is usually priced
on an mcf basis, adjusted for BTU content.
Productive: Able to produce oil and/or gas.
Proved reserves: Estimated quantities of crude oil, condensate, natural
gas, and natural gas liquids that geological and engineering data
demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be commercially recoverable in the
future from known reservoirs under existing conditions using established
operating procedures and under current governmental regulations.
Proved undeveloped reserves: Economically recoverable reserves estimated to
exist in proved reservoirs, which will be recovered from wells, drilled in
the future.
Reserves: The estimated value of oil, gas and/or condensate, which is
economically recoverable.
The Company has not filed reserve estimates with any federal agency.
Effective July 1, 2004, for accounting purposes, Teton sold its interest in
Goloil. The chart below sets forth certain production data for the fiscal years
ending December 31, 2002 and 2003, and for the period ending June 30, 2004,
prior to such sale. Additional oil and gas disclosure can be found in Note 9 of
the Financial Statements.
PRODUCTION DATA
2004 2003 2002
Total gross oil production,
barrels 1,393,616 2,528,260 1,884,933
Total gross gas production,
MCF - - -
Net oil production, barrel
(1) 348,404 632,065 471,233
Net gas production, MCF - - -
Average oil sales price,
$/Bbl (2) $ 18.98 $ 18.11 $ 15.62
Average gas sales price,
S/MCF - - -
Average production cost per
barrel (3) $ 16.12 $ 16.11 $ 13.32
Gross productive wells
Oil 24.0 21.0 13.0
Gas - - -
--------- --------- ---------
Total 24.0 21.0 13.0
========= ========= =========
Net productive wells 12.0 10.5 6.5
Gas - - -
--------- --------- --------
Total 12.0 10.5 6.5
========= ========= =========
(1) Net production and net well count is based on Teton's effective net
interest as of the end of each year. Prior to August 2000 and after
November 2002, Teton owned 100% of the effective net interest in Goltech.
(2) Average oil sales price is a combination of domestic (Russian) and export
price.
(3) Excludes production payment to EUA.
(4) The following chart sets forth the number of productive wells and dry
exploratory and productive wells drilled and completed during the last
three fiscal years in the Goloil license area prior to the sale of Teton's
interest in Goloil:
NET WELLS DRILLED
Year Ended
December 31, 2004 2003 2002
------------ --------------- --------------- ---------------
Gross Net (1) Gross Net (1) Gross Net (1)
----- ------ ----- ------ ----- ------
Number of
Wells Drilled
Exploratory
(Research)
Productive - - - - - -
Dry - - - - - -
------ ------ ----- ------ ------ -----
Total - - - - - -
====== ====== ===== ====== ====== =====
Development
Productive 3.0 1.5 7.0 3.5 6.0 3.0
Dry - - - - - -
------ ------ ----- ------ ------ ------
Total 3.0 1.5 7.0 3.5 6.0 3.0
====== ====== ===== ====== ====== ======
(1) Net well count is based on Teton's effective net interest as of the end of
each year. Prior to August 2000, Teton owned 100% of the interest in
Goltech. Subsequent to August 2000 our interest was reduced to 50%.
Subsequent to November 2002, Teton's effective net interest in Goloil again
became 100%.
Proved and Producing Properties
At December 31, 2004 the Company did not have any proved or producing
properties.
Developed And Undeveloped Acreage
At December 31, 2004 the Company did not have any developed or undeveloped
acreage.
The following table sets forth the total gross and net developed acres and total
gross and net undeveloped acres of the Company as of March 15, 2005:
Gross Net
Total Undeveloped Acres 6,300 1,575
Such undeveloped acreage is concentrated in western Colorado.
Our offices are located in Denver, Colorado. We lease our offices from an
unaffiliated third party. The term of such lease is one year, and the lease
expires in July 2005.
Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
Teton currently is not a party to any material legal proceedings.
Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
No matters were submitted to a vote of our security holders during the fourth
quarter of 2004.
PART II
Item 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDERS MATTERS.
Teton's common stock is listed and principally traded on the American Stock
Exchange, under the symbol "TPE." Our common stock is also listed for trading on
the Frankfurt Stock Exchange (Germany) under the symbol "TP9."
Prior to listing on the AMEX on May 6, 2003, our common stock was quoted on the
OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol "TTPT" from November 27, 2001 to April 25,
2003 and then under the symbol "TTPE" from April 28, 2003 to May 5, 2003 as a
result of a 1 for 12 reverse stock split.
The following table sets forth, on a per share basis, the range of high and low
bid information for the common stock on the OTC Bulletin Board until May 5,
2003, and after May 5, 2003 the high and low closing price on the American Stock
Exchange:
High Low
---- ---
2004 period
- -----------
First quarter $ 5.24 $ 3.36
Second quarter $ 4.00 $ 1.80
Third quarter $ 2.55 $ 1.25
Fourth quarter $ 1.85 $ 1.20
2003 period
- -----------
First quarter $ 5.52* $ 3.36*
Second quarter as of May 5, 2003 $ 5.00* $ 4.10*
Second quarter commencing May 6, 2003 $ 5.40 $ 4.10
Third quarter $ 4.58 $ 3.71
Fourth quarter $ 5.58 $ 3.80
*Represents quotations while the Company was listed on the OTC Bulletin Board.
The quotations from the OTC Bulletin Board reflect inter-dealer prices without
retail markup, markdown, or a commission, and may not necessarily represent
actual transactions.
Holders: As of March 10, 2005, there were approximately 197 holders of record of
Teton's common stock.
Dividends: Teton has not paid any dividends on its common stock since inception.
Teton does not anticipate declaration or payment of any dividends at any time in
the foreseeable future.
Recent Issuances of Unregistered Securities
During the fourth quarter, 8,451 unregistered shares of Teton's common stock
were issued to the members of Teton's advisory board for services. The
securities were issued in reliance on an exemption from registration provided in
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, based on the limited
number of purchasers, their access to material information concerning the
Company and their representations that they were acquiring the securities for
investment.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table sets forth information about our equity compensation plans
at December 31, 2004:
Plan category Number of Weighted average Number of
securities to exercise price securities
be issued upon of outstanding remaining
exercise of options, available for
outstanding warrants and future issuance
options, rights
warrants and
rights
(a) (b) (c)
-------------- --------------- ----------------
Equity compensation plans 1,999,037 $3.51 6,963
approved by security holders
Equity compensation plans 994,000 $3.60 0
not approved by security
holders
Total 2,993,037 $3.48 6,963
See Note 5 to the financial statements for discussion of options issued in 2004.
Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.
The following table sets forth selected financial data, derived from the
financial statements, regarding Teton's financial position and results of
operations as of the dates indicated. This selected financial data should be
read in conjunction with our financial statements and notes to the financial
statements.
As of and for the Year Ended December 31,
-----------------------------------------
2004 2003 2002 2001 2000
----------- ----------- ------------ ----------- -----------
Summary of Operations
- ---------------------
Loss from continuing operations $(5,193,281) $(4,036,164) $(10,191,307) $(1,373,470) $(2,825,767)
Discontinued operations,
net of tax 12,383,582 (1,598,680) (752,616) (284,138) (240,102)
----------- ----------- ------------ ----------- -----------
Net income (loss) 7,190,301 (5,634,844) (10,973,923) (1,657,608) (3,065,869)
Income (loss) per share for:
Continuing operations $ (.64) $ (1.00) $ (3.28) $ (.05) $ (.16)
Discontinued operations 1.37 (.23) (.25) (.01) (.01)
Net income .73 (1.23) (3.53) (.06) (.17)
Balance Sheet
- -------------
Total assets 17,611,565 20,718,375 10,012,395 2,211,312 2,317,099
Notes payable -- -- -- 844,210 1,425,000
Cash dividends per common share -- -- -- -- --
Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS.
The following discussion and analysis of our plan of operation should be read in
conjunction with the financial statements and the related notes.
We have identified certain policies as critical to our business operations and
the understanding of our results of operations. The impact and any associated
risks related to these policies on our business operations is discussed
throughout Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations where such policies affect our reported and expected
financial results.
Overview
Teton Petroleum Company is an independent oil and gas exploration and production
company which is currently focused on a drilling program in the Piceance Basin
in western Colorado of 6,300 acres and a separate acreage play of up to 180,000
acres in North America. Teton's primary focus, until July 16, 2004 was the
Russian Federation and former Commonwealth of Independent States ("CIS"). See
"Sale of Goloil Interest" below. The Company, through its wholly owned
subsidiary, Goltech, owned a 35.30% equity interest in Goloil. RussNeft (the
Company's partner in Goloil) owned, until the sale, the remaining 64.70% of
Goloil through two subsidiaries, McGrady and InvestPetrol. McGrady held 35.29%
and InvestPetrol held 29.41% of the equity interests in Goloil. However, until
Goltech and McGrady received the return of 100% of their capital investment in
Goloil, they were each entitled to a 50% net profit in Goloil. During our
ownership of Goloil, it was managed by a seven person management board on which
we had two representatives. Pursuant to the existing agreements among Goloil's
shareholders, Goltech and McGrady shared equally in capital expenditures, gross
revenues, costs and expenses, until they received 100% return of their
investments in Goloil. Limited Liability Company Energosoyuz-A ("EUA"), a wholly
owned subsidiary of RussNeft, is the lessor of certain oil field facilities to
Goloil pursuant to a Lease Agreement No. EST 160/000630 (the "EUA Lease
Agreement") among EUA as lessor and Goloil as lessee dated as June 2000. EUA was
also the recipient of a production payment ("Production Payment") consisting of
50% of Goloil's production (or at EUA's option, cash in lieu of such
production). Between October 2003 through the effective date of the sale EUA
took cash instead of oil under the Production Payment in the amount of
approximately $650,000 per month. In addition, Goloil had been selling its oil
at a fixed price of 2,400 rubles per ton or $11.50 per barrel and starting May
2004, 2,700 rubles per ton or $12.74 per barrel. It is possible that a
significant portion of such sales were made to or through one or more affiliates
of RussNeft.
RussNeft, which was founded in the fall of 2002, is one of Russia's largest
independent oil producers. In September 2003, RussNeft acquired a 64.70% equity
interest in Goloil in a private transaction in which it purchased all of the
ownership interests in McGrady and InvestPetrol, the other shareholders of
Goloil. At that time, RussNeft also acquired EUA, the lessor of various wells
and facilities to Goloil under the EUA Lease Agreement. In acquiring such
interests, RussNeft became entitled to appoint a majority of the management
board of Goloil and succeeded to EUA's interest in the Production Payment.
Financial highlights for the year ended December 31, 2004 include the following:
o Teton sold its share in Goloil and recorded a gain of $13,086,761.
o Teton's net loss from continuing operations for the fourth quarter ended
December 31, 2004 was $905,832 compared to $1,296,412 for the same period
in 2004. Teton's net loss from continuing operations for the year ended
December 31, 2004 was $5,193,281 compared to $4,036,164 for 2003.
During 2004 Teton's activities were focused in three areas:
o Negotiating and finalizing the sale of Goloil to RussNeft; and
o Evaluating and negotiating potential acquisitions of other producing oil
properties in the United States, Russia and the CIS.
o Signing a Letter of Intent to acquire up to 180,000 acres in a North
American oil and gas play.
Sale of Goloil Interest to RussNeft
The sale of the Company's interest in Goloil received shareholder approval, at
our annual meeting held July 16, 2004, and the sale closed on August 3, 2004,
effective July 1, 2004 for accounting purposes. The purchase price for our
35.30% interest in Goloil was $8,960,000 in cash, which was received during
August 2004. Goloil also repaid advances made by the Company to Goloil totaling
$6,040,000. The advances were made to Goloil by the Company to finance our 50%
share of Goloil's capital expenditures and currently bore interest at the rate
of 8% per annum. The gross proceeds of the two transactions to the Company
totaled $15,000,000.
2005 Operational and Financial Objectives - Update
- --------------------------------------------------
During 2004, the Company actively sought to increase shareholder value by
seeking to acquire both producing and non-producing properties that would
provide for near-term cash flow and/or the ability to grow reserves and
production, primarily through drilling operations in the United States, Russia
and the CIS, where the Company itself will have the opportunity to jointly or
fully operate the property. In particular, the Company elected to target
properties in North America with existing production in the range of 400 to 600
barrels of oil equivalent per day and 2,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day in
the former Soviet Union with upside potential from developmental drilling and
other exploitation opportunities. Among the financial criteria for such
acquisitions was that they generate positive cash flow and be accretive to the
Company earnings within approximately one year. Over the past two years, the
Company has evaluated over 300 projects. The Company announced the signing of a
binding letter of intent in December 2004 and subsequently the signing of a
definitive purchase agreement in January 2005 regarding up to 180,000 acres in
North America. It is in the process of completing the due diligence on that
acreage. In addition, the Company closed a separate acquisition in February
2005, in which it purchase a 25% interest in 6,300 acres in the Piceance Basin
in Western Colorado. See subsequent events below.
Prior to August 2004 the Company emphasized acquisitions in Russia and the CIS.
Recent developments in Russia have caused the Company to redirect the focus of
its efforts, most recently, on opportunities in North America and specifically
in the Rocky Mountains.
The Company's plans to pursue acquisitions means that it will incur due
diligence and legal expenses, which will be capitalized if the Company
successfully completes an acquisition. If an acquisition is not successful, such
costs will be included in its general and administrative expenses. The Company
is now devoting significant internal resources to evaluating acquisitions while
also utilizing the services of outside technical, legal and accounting
consultants.
Results of Operations 2004 Compared to 2003
- -------------------------------------------
The Company has a net loss from continuing operations for the year ending
December 31, 2004 of $5,193,281 compared to a loss of $4,036,164 for the prior
year, which is an increase of $1,157,117 primarily due to the increase in
general and administrative expenses from $3,920,791 for the year ending December
31, 2003 to $5,332,291 for the year ending December 31, 2004. This is due to
several reasons including:
o The Company pursued, but failed to close on, several acquisitions which
resulted in the expensing of the various due diligence costs incurred on
such acquisitions ($409,000).
o The Company increased its payroll during the early part of 2004 as it
increased its staffing levels to begin its investment and acquisition
program ($358,000).
o As part of their performance review for 2003, the Board paid out bonuses to
senior management in the first quarter of 2004 ($300,000).
o The Company began compensating outside Directors in cash and stock payments
($140,000)
o The Company incurred significant legal, investor relations, accounting and
other expenses in selling its interest in Goloil and in preparation of the
related proxy statement in order to obtain shareholder approval of such
sale ($188,000).
o Since July of 2004 the Company has incurred severance and other one time
costs as it reduces its staff, offices and other commitments ($218,000).
o The Company opened a representative office in Moscow in December 2003 to
better monitor its operations, as well as to establish a higher profile in
the Russian oil industry and facilitate greater deal flow as it pursued
acquisition opportunities in Russia and in other FSU states. Then, due to
the Company's decision to exit Russia, as discussed above, such office was
closed in December 2004 and the Company incurred closing costs which have
been included in continuing operations at December 31, 2004 ($70,000).
Other income in 2004 includes interest income from the cash balances maintained.
The Company expects to continue to streamline its costs in the future, and, as
of March 13, 2005, the Company has reduced its monthly overhead, exclusive of
due diligence costs, to $150,000 per month, and expects further adjustments as
it refocuses its effort on projects in the U.S. Rocky Mountains.
Discontinued Operations 2004 Compared to 2003
- ---------------------------------------------
See Note 2 to financial statements for a summary of the income (loss) from
discontinued operations. The Company considered the sale of Goloil to be
effective July 1, 2004. Accordingly, the operating activities of Goloil for the
six months ended June 30, 2004 have been included in the Company's 2004
statement of operations as a net loss from discontinued operations. Goloil's
operating revenues and expenses for six months of 2004 are less than 2003
because Teton has recorded a full year of operations for 2003. Goloil sold its
production in 2004 at an average price of $18.98 per barrel which approximates
the $18.11 price for oil sold in 2003. However, 2004 production was sold
exclusively to the domestic and near abroad markets and not the export market
which during 2004 were selling oil at a price substantially above the price
received. Prior to September 30, 2003, Goloil had sold its oil for a blended oil
price which included sales to the export market.
The $13,086,761 gain includes the $8,960,000 proceeds from the sale of Goloil
stock, net of $997,000 in expenses plus the elimination of approximately $5.1
million in net liabilities included in the pro rata consolidation of Goloil as
of June 30, 2004
Results of Operations 2003 Compared to 2002
- -------------------------------------------
The Company's net loss from continuing operations decreased from $10,191,307 in
2002 to a net loss of $4,036,164 in 2003. This was primarily due to the fact
that general and administrative expenses decreased from $4,744,952 in 2002 to
$3,920,791 in 2003, primarily due to a decrease of $1,562,575 in fees paid to
consultants for capital raising activities offset by increases in compensation
to officers and employees ($323,951) professional fees ($109,146) travel and
entertainment ($193,773), and expenses related to marketing, advertising, and
investor relations ($167,987).
Financing charges recorded decreased from $5,498,106 in 2002 to $132,818 in
2003. In 2002, the Company recorded a $4,715,000 non-cash financing charge as a
result of warrants issued with debentures and in-the-money conversion features
present at issuance.
Discontinued Operations 2003 Compared to 2002
- ---------------------------------------------
See Note 2 to the financial statements for a summary of the loss from
discontinued operations for 2003 and 2002. The loss from discontinued operations
increased to $1,598,680 for the year ending December 31, 2003 from $782,616 for
the year ended December 31, 2002. Teton's share of Goloil's costs of sales and
expenses increased 62.2%, which was slightly less than the increase in revenues.
However, depreciation, depletion and amortization expense recorded for 2003 rose
250.1%, from $451,930 to $1,582,513, reflecting the capital expenditures
incurred by Goloil as it developed its license.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company had a cash balance of $17,433,424 at December 31, 2004 and a working
capital surplus of $17,103,015.
See subsequent events below for a discussion of the Company's purchase of 25% of
the membership interest in Piceance Gas Resources, LLC from PGR. In addition to
the cash purchase price of $5.25 million, the Company estimates that its cash
commitment to PGR for the year ending December 31, 2005 will total $3,500,000.
Such commitment includes the Company's share of the cost of a road and the
drilling of eight wells. At this point in time, the Company anticipates
utilizing the working capital of the Company to meet its commitment. However,
the business plan for PGR Partners, LLC includes using commercial bank
financing, when practical.
The Company has the working capital to complete the additional purchase of up to
180,000 acres in April 2005 (see subsequent events below) and to begin its
evaluation of the prospects on such acreage.
The Company may require additional financing during 2006 for the anticipated
capital programs for the two acquisitions or if the Company identifies other
acquisitions that meet its investment criteria. Such additional financing may be
debt or equity or a combination of both. See sources and uses of funds below.
Sources and Uses of Funds
Historically, Teton's primary source of liquidity has been cash provided by
equity offerings. Such offerings are expected to continue to play an important
role in financing Teton's business for the foreseeable future. In addition, the
Company is working to establish a borrowing facility with one or more
international banks, most likely in the form of a revolving line of credit that
will be used primarily for the acquisition of producing properties and for
developmental drilling and other capital expenditures.
Cash Flows and Capital Expenditures
During the year ended December 31, 2004 the Company used $4,420,775 in its
operating activities primarily to finance its efforts in respect of potential
acquisitions and in respect of personnel costs. This amount compares to
$3,063,845 used in operating activities in 2003.
During 2004, the Company received the reimbursement of advances totaling
$6,040,000 pursuant to its agreement with RussNeft and, net of expenses and
taxes, $7,963,450 from the sale of Goloil.
During 2004, the Company received $499,998 from the sale of preferred stock. The
increase in cash flows from financing activities from discontinued operations
represents amounts advanced by RussNeft to Goloil. As discussed above, such
advances will be eliminated now that the sale of Goloil has been completed.
Income Taxes, Net Operating Losses and Tax Credit
While the Company will realize a U.S. tax gain from sale of discontinued
operations of approximately $12.0 million, after utilization of NOL and current
year operating losses, Teton will not incur a tax liability. At December 31,
2004, after the gain on sale, the Company has a remaining net operating loss for
U.S. income tax purposes of $11,800,000. Such net operating loss is subject to
U.S. Internal Revenue Code Section 382 limitations. As of November 1, 2004
utilization of the NOL is limited to approximately $900,000 per annum.
The Company has established a valuation allowance for deferred taxes that
reduces its net deferred tax assets as management currently believes that these
losses will not be utilized in the near term. The allowance recorded was $4.6
million and $7.2 million for 2004 and 2003 respectively. The Company reduced the
valuation allowance in 2004 by approximately $2.6 million due to the utilization
of net operating loss carryforwards.
Subsequent Events
On January 5, 2005 the Company entered into a definitive purchase and sale
agreement for the acquisition of certain oil and gas leases covering up to
180,000 acres in North America. The closing of the transaction is subject to the
satisfactory results of a due diligence investigation and other conditions. The
transaction is currently pending and the terms are being kept confidential
subject to a request for confidential treatment previously filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company paid a nonrefundable deposit of
$25,000 in December upon signing a letter of intent. Earnest money of $322,000
was paid in January upon signing the purchase and sale agreement. The balance
due in cash, stock and warrants will be paid at closing. The Company expects to
close the transaction on or before April 15, 2005.
On February 15, 2005, in a second acquisition, the Company signed a membership
interest purchase agreement with PGR Partners, LLC ("PGR") whereby the Company
acquired 25% of the membership interest in Piceance Gas Resources, LLC, a
Colorado limited liability company ("Piceance LLC"). Piceance LLC owns certain
oil and gas rights and leasehold assets covering approximately 6,300 acres in
the Piceance Basin in Western Colorado. The properties owned by Piceance LLC
carry a net revenue interest of 78.75%.
The purchase price for the membership interest in Piceance LLC was $5.25 million
in cash, the issuance of 450,000 unregistered shares of our common stock, and
the issuance of warrants to purchase 200,000 shares of our common stock,
exercisable for a period of five years at an exercise price of $2.00 per share.
Pursuant to the terms of the operating agreement, the Company is obligated to
fund its share of the construction of a road on the leased area and eight wells
to be drilled during 2005.
On February 22, 2005, Mr. Cooper resigned as executive chairman of the Company.
Mr. Cooper will remain on the Company's Board and will stand for reelection at
the Company's upcoming annual meeting in May. In addition, Mr. Cooper will
remain a consultant to the Company. On February 22, 2005, our Board elected
James J. Woodcock, an outside director, as non-executive chairman of the
Company.
Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS.
Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market rates
and prices, such as foreign currency exchange and interest rates and commodity
prices. As of August, 2004, when the Company sold its interest in Goloil, the
Company is no longer exposed to foreign currency exchange risk.
Currently, the Company is not involved in any hedge contracts, although we may
consider hedge agreements in the future to manage the exposure to commodity
price risk.
Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
TETON PETROLEUM COMPANY
Table of Contents
- -----------------
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' (Deficit) Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Teton Petroleum Company
Denver, Colorado
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Teton Petroleum
Company and subsidiary as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related
consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, changes in
stockholders' (deficit) equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three
year period ended December 31, 2004. These consolidated financial statements are
the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company
is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its
internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of
internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control
over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Teton Petroleum
Company and subsidiary as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of
their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three year
period ended December 31, 2004 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC
--------------------------------------
Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC
Denver, Colorado
March 4, 2005
TETON PETROLEUM COMPANY
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, 2004 and 2003
December 31,
------------------
2004 2003
---- ----
Assets
Current assets
Cash $17,433,424 $ 7,515,994
Current assets of discontinued operations - 1,615,365
Prepaid expenses and other assets 100,917 95,693
----------- -----------
Total current assets 17,534,341 9,227,052
----------- -----------
Non-current assets
Non-current assets of discontinued operations - 11,473,139
Deposits 25,000 -
Fixed assets, net of accumulated depreciation of
$12,426 and $1,046 52,224 18,184
----------- -----------
Total non-current assets 77,224 11,491,323
----------- -----------
Total assets $17,611,565 $20,718,375
=========== ===========
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $ 411,745 $ 376,429
Current liabilities of discontinued operations - 10,010,310
----------- -----------
Total current liabilities 411,745 10,386,739
----------- -----------
Non-current liabilities
Discontinued operations - 126,500
----------- -----------
Total non-current liabilities - 126,500
----------- -----------
Total liabilities 411,745 10,513,239
----------- -----------
Commitments
Stockholders' equity
Series A convertible preferred stock, $.001 par
value, 25,000,000 shares authorized, 281,460 and
618,231 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2004
and 2003. Liquidation preference at December 31,
2004 and 2003 of $1,248,838 and $2,689,305 281 618
Common stock, $.001 par value, 250,000,000 shares
authorized, 9,130,257 shares issued and outstanding
at December 31, 2004 and 8,584,068 shares issued and
outstanding at December 31, 2003 9,130 8,584
Additional paid-in capital 37,657,686 37,073,366
Unamortized preferred stock dividends - (118,610)
Accumulated deficit (20,467,277) (27,657,578)
Foreign currency translation adjustment - 898,756
----------- -----------
Total stockholders' equity 17,199,820 10,205,136
----------- -----------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $17,611,565 $20,718,375
=========== ===========
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
TETON PETROLEUM COMPANY
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
For the Years Ended
December 31,
---------------------------------------------
2004 2003 2002
------------ ------------ ------------
Costs and expenses:
General and administrative $ 5,332,991 $ 3,920,791 $ 4,744,952
------------ ------------ ------------
Total costs and expenses 5,332,991 3,920,791 4,744,952
------------ ------------ ------------
Loss from operations (5,332,991) (3,920,791) (4,744,952)
------------ ------------ ------------
Other income (expense)
Other income 139,710 17,445 51,751
Financing charges - (132,818) (5,498,106)
------------ ------------ ------------
Total other income (expense) 139,710 (115,373) (5,446,355)
------------ ------------ ------------
Loss from continuing operations (5,193,281) (4,036,164) (10,191,307)
Discontinued operations, net of tax 12,383,582 (1,598,680) (782,616)
------------ ------------ ------------
Net income (loss) 7,190,301 (5,634,844) (10,973,923)
Imputed preferred stock dividends for
inducements and beneficial conversion
charges (521,482) (2,780,693) --
Preferred stock dividends (105,949) -- --
------------ ------------ ------------
Net income (loss) applicable to
common shares 6,562,870 (8,415,537) (10,973,923)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net
of tax effect of exchange rates (898,756) 168,256 (140,773)
------------ ------------ ------------
Comprehensive (loss) income $ 5,664,114 $ (8,247,281) $(11,114,696)
============ ============ ============
Basic and diluted weighted average
common shares outstanding 9,028,967 6,840,303 3,105,325
============ ============ ============
Basic and diluted loss per common
share for continuing operations $ (0.64) $ (1.00) $ (3.28)
=========== =========== ===========
Basic and diluted weighted average
income (loss) per common shares for
discontinued operations $ 1.37 $ (0.23) $ (0.25)
=========== ========== ==========
Basic and diluted income (loss) per
common share $ 0.73 $ (1.23) $ (3.53)
=========== =========== ===========
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
TETON PETROLEUM COMPANY
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' (Deficit) Equity
Unamortized Foreign Total
Preferred Stock Common Stock Additional Preferred Currency Stockholders'
------------------------- ------------------------- Paid-in Stock Translation Accumulated (Deficit)
Shares Amount Shares Amount Capital Dividends Adjustment Deficit Equity
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Balance - December 31, 2001 - $ - 2,374,046 $ 2,374 $ 9,792,722 $ - $ 871,273 $(11,048,811) $ (382,442)
Common stock issued for cash - - 1,223,737 1,224 3,332,236 - - - 3,333,460
Common stock subscriptions paid in 2003 - - 712,045 712 1,938,898 - - - 1,939,610
Common stock and warrants issued for services - - 221,198 221 836,905 - - - 837,126
Common stock issued for conversion of convertible
debentures - - 1,758,494 1,758 5,353,231 - - - 5,354,989
Warrants issued and in-the-money conversion feature on
convertible debentures - - - - 4,557,845 - - - 4,557,845
Warrants issued with notes payable - - - - 150,016 - - - 150,016
Warrants issued in connection with extensions on notes
payable - - - - 203,362 - - - 203,362
Net loss - - - - - - - (10,973,923) (10,973,923)
Foreign currency translation adjustment - - - - - - (140,773) - (140,773)
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Balance - December 31, 2002 - - 6,289,520 6,289 26,165,215 - 730,500 (22,022,734) 4,879,270
Common stock issued for cash - net of commissions of
$98,100 - - 437,012 437 1,091,463 - - - 1,091,900
Common stock issued for settlement of accounts payable
and accrued liabilities - - 79,793 80 219,920 - - - 220,000
Options issued to advisory board and common stock issued
for services - - 1,035 1 97,901 - - - 97,902
Warrants issued with notes payable - - - 110,170 - - - 110,170
Preferred stock issued for cash, net of commissions of
$473,838 (cash) and $99,168 (non-cash) 2,226,680 2,226 - - 9,110,830 - - - 9,113,056
Preferred stock converted to common stock (1,645,099) (1,645) 1,776,708 1,775 (131) - - - -
Preferred stock issued in exchange for notes payable and
accrued interest of
- ----------------------------------------------------------
$9,426 36,650 37 - - 159,389 - - - 159,426
In-the-money conversion feature charges to be amortized - - - - 1,182,452 (1,182,452) - - -
Amortization of in-the-money conversion feature charges - - - - (1,063,842) 1,063,842 - - -
Net loss - - - - - - - (5,634,844) (5,634,844)
Foreign currency translation adjustment - - - - - - 168,256 - 168,256
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Balance - December 31, 2003 618,231 618 8,584,068 8,583 37,073,366 (118,610) 898,756 (27,657,578) 10,205,136
Common stock issued for settlement of accrued liabilities - - 13,750 14 58,686 - - - 58,700
Common stock issued for services - - 32,175 33 101,297 - - - 101,329
Warrants issued for services - - - - 149,061 - - - 149,061
Preferred stock issued for cash, net of commissions of
$50,000(cash) and $22,863 (non-cash) 126,436 126 - - 499,872 - - - 499,998
Preferred stock converted to common stock (463,207) (463) 500,264 500 (37) - - - -
Amortization of Preferred Stock dividends - - - - (118,610) 118,610 - - -
Preferred stock dividends - - - - (105,949) - - - (105,949)
Foreign currency translation adjustment - - - - - - (898,756) - (898,756)
Net income for year - - - - - - - 7,190,301 7,190,301
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Balance - December 31, 2004 281,460 $ 281 9,130,257 $ 9,130 $37,657,686 $ - $ - $(20,467,277) $17,199,820
=========== =========== =========== =========== =========== =========== =========== ============ ===========
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
TETON PETROLEUM COMPANY
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Years Ended
December 31,
--------------------------------------------
2004 2003 2002
------------ ----------- ------------
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income (loss) $ 7,190,301 $(5,634,844) $(10,973,923)
------------ ----------- ------------
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash used in operating activities
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization 11,380 1,046 -
Gain on sale of discontinued operations (13,086,761) - -
Stock based compensation for variable plan
warrants - - -
Stock and stock options issued for services
and interest - 107,128 -
Warrants issued for notes payable extensions - 110,170 46,582
Stock and warrants issued for services 250,390 - 837,126
Debentures issued for services - - 267,500
Amortization of debenture and note payable
discounts - - 5,331,412
Changes in assets and liabilities
From discontinued operations 1,149,609 2,045,001 (929,969)
Prepaid expenses and other assets (5,224) (4,247) (57,446)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 69,530 311,901 290,131
------------ ----------- ------------
(11,611,076) 2,570,999 5,785,336
------------ ----------- ------------
Net cash used in operating activities (4,420,775) (3,063,845) (5,188,587)
------------ ----------- ------------
Cash flows from investing activities
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations 7,963,450 - -
Repayments of loan from discontinued operating
entity 6,040,000 - -
Increase in deposits (25,000) - -
Increase in fixed asset additions (45,420) ( 20,684) -
Increase in non-current assets of
discontinued operating entity (2,988,882) (7,072,462) (3,222,349)
------------ ----------- ------------
Net cash used in investing activities 10,944,148 (7,093,146) (3,222,349)
------------ ----------- ------------
Cash flows from financing activities
From discontinued operations 3,258,378 4,470,984 2,178,525
Proceeds from stock subscription - 1,939,610 -
Proceeds from issuance of stock, net of
$50,000 and $473,838 commissions 499,998 10,251,924 3,333,460
Proceeds from issuance of convertible debentures - - 4,143,643
Proceeds from notes payable - 628,750 300,000
Payments on notes payable - (478,750) (894,210)
Dividends (81,463) - -
------------ ----------- ------------
Net cash provided by financing activities 3,676,913 16,812,518 9,061,418
------------ ----------- ------------
Effect of exchange rates (282,856) 168,256 (140,773)
------------ ----------- ------------
Net increase in cash 9,917,430 6,823,783 509,709
Cash - beginning of year 7,515,994 692,211 182,502
------------ ----------- ------------
Cash - end of year $ 17,433,424 $ 7,515,994 $ 692,211
============ =========== ============
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for: Interest
--------
2004 $ --
2003 $18,202
2002 $120,008
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activity:
During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company had the following
transactions:
The Company has issued warrants to consultants for services valued at
$149,061.
13,750 shares of common stock were issued for the settlement of accrued
liabilities at December 31, 2003 valued at $58,700.
The Company has issued 32,175 shares of common stock for services to
consultants and outside directors valued at $101,329.
Approximately $1,317,000 of capital expenditures for discontinued
operations were included in current liabilities of discontinued operations
at June 30, 2004 and approximately $1,786,000 of capital expenditures were
in accounts payable at December 31, 2003 for a decrease during the six
months ended June 30, 2004 of $469,000.
Conversion of 463,207 shares of preferred stock, plus dividends of 37,057
shares converted into 500,264 shares of common stock.
The Company accrued dividends to preferred stockholders of $24,486 at
December 31, 2004.
During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company had the following transactions:
128,700 warrants issued with debt and valued at $110,170 were initially
recorded as a discount on the note payable. At December 31, 2003, the full
amount of the discount had been amortized as financing costs.
79,793 shares of common stock were issued for settlement of accounts
payable and accrued liabilities valued at $220,000.
The Company issued 30,000 non-qualified options to advisory board members
valued at $94,702.
The Company issued 1,035 shares of common stock for services valued at
$3,201.
The Company has accrued a liability for $46,968 related to the obligation
to issue 57,420 warrants to a consultant for capital raising services.
12,000 preferred shares were issued to consultants for services valued at
$52,200 related to capital raising.
Approximately $1,785,000 of capital expenditures for oil and gas properties
were included in current liabilities of discontinued operations at December
31, 2003.
During 2002, the Company had the following transactions:
In exchange for the extension of principal payments on four notes payable,
the Company modified expiration dates of certain warrants previously held
by the note holders and issued an additional 10,416 such warrants. The fair
value of the modification of the warrants totaled $46,582 and has been
recorded as financing costs.
A note payable of $250,000 was converted into a convertible debenture with
83,333 warrants also being issued under the same terms of the Company's
private placement offering of convertible debentures.
1,647,881 warrants were issued with convertible debentures valued at
$811,559 were initially recorded as a discount on the debentures. At
December 31, 2002, the full amount of the discount had been amortized as
financing costs.
In-the-money conversion features on convertible debt valued at $3,746,285
were recognized as financing costs.
The Company issued 143,678 warrants in connection with related party notes
payable of $450,000 and $50,000. The warrants were valued at $156,781 and
recorded as financing costs.
$267,500 of convertible debentures with 89,167 warrants valued at $14,250
for a total amount of $281,750 were issued for consulting services.
41,667 warrants issued with a note payable valued at $150,016 were
initially recorded as a discount on the note payable. At December 31, 2002
the full discount had been amortized and recorded as financing costs.
$4,661,143 of debentures and accrued interest of $227,075 were converted
into 1,758,494 shares of stock with $466,771 being paid as a premium at
conversion and recorded as financing costs.
221,198 shares of stock were issued to consultants for services valued at
$607,790.
133,333 warrants were issued to consultants for services valued at
$215,086.
Approximately $1,142,000 of capital expenditures for oil and gas properties
were included in current liabilities from discontinued operations at
December 31, 2002.
During the fourth quarter of 2002, the Company received $1,939,610 of stock
subscriptions receivable for 712,045 shares of stock. The cash for these
subscriptions was paid during the first quarter of 2003.
TETON PETROLEUM COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
For The Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
Note 1 - Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Teton Petroleum Company (the Company) is an oil and gas exploration and
production company whose focus, prior to July 1, 2004, was the Russian
Federation through ownership of a 35.30% interest in ZAO Goloil, a Russian
closed joint-stock company ("ZAO Goloil"). The Company sold all of it's interest
in Goloil effective July 1, 2004 (see Note 2 to financial statements). Since the
sale of ZAO Goloil, the Company has focused primarily on acquiring oil and gas
prospects and properties in North America. See Note 8, Subsequent Events.
The exploration and development of oil and gas reserves involves significant
financial risks. The ability of the Company to meet its obligations and
commitments under the terms and conditions of its agreements and carry out its
planned exploration activities is dependent upon continued financial support
from its stockholders, the ability to develop economically recoverable reserves,
and its ability to obtain necessary financing to complete development of the
reserves.
The United States dollar is the principal currency of the Company's business
and, accordingly, these consolidated financial statements are expressed in
United States dollars.
Discontinued Operations and Principles of Consolidation
- -------------------------------------------------------
See Note 2 for a summary of the income (loss) from discontinued operations. The
Company considers the sale of Goloil to be effective July 1, 2004 for accounting
purposes. Accordingly the operating activities of ZAO Goloil for the six months
ended June 30, 2004 and the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 have been
included in the results from discontinued operations.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Teton
Petroleum Company and through June 30, 2004, its wholly owned subsidiary,
Goltech Petroleum, LLC ("Goltech"). All intercompany accounts and transactions
have been eliminated in consolidation.
During 2002, the Company owned a 50% interest in Goltech, which had a 70.59%
interest in ZAO Goloil. Accordingly ZAO Goloil was consolidated into Goltech and
the Company reflected its 50% share of Goltech. As of December 31, 2002, the
other 50% member of Goltech relinquished their ownership interest in exchange
for a 35.295% direct ownership interest in ZAO Goloil. The audited financial
statements as of June 30, 2004, December 31, 2003 and 2002, as is customary in
the oil and gas industry, reflect a pro-rata consolidation of the Company's
interest in ZAO Goloil (a Russian Company) through its wholly owned subsidiary
Goltech. Due to the sale of ZAO Goloil, the pro-rata consolidated amounts have
been reclassified as assets, liabilities and included in the results from
discontinued operations.
Use of Estimates
- ----------------
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during
the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
- -------------------------
The Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with an original
maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company continually
monitors its positions with, and the credit quality of, the financial
institutions it invests with. As of the balance sheet date, the Company had no
cash equivalents.
Revenue Recognition
- -------------------
The Company recognizes oil sales revenue at the point in time oil quantities
have been delivered to purchasers.
Comprehensive Income
- --------------------
Comprehensive income is defined as the change in equity during a period from
transactions and other events from non-owner sources. Comprehensive income is
the total of net income or loss and other comprehensive income or loss. The
effect of foreign currency exchange rates currently is the Company's only item,
which constitutes comprehensive income or loss.
Oil and Gas Properties
- ----------------------
The Company uses the successful efforts method of accounting for oil and gas
producing activities. Costs to acquire mineral interests in oil and gas
properties, to drill and equip exploratory wells that find proved reserves, and
to drill and equip development wells are capitalized. Costs to drill exploratory
wells that do not find proved reserves, geological and geophysical costs, and
costs of carrying and retaining unproved properties are expensed. The Company
also evaluates costs capitalized for exploratory wells, and if proved reserves
cannot be determined within one year from drilling exploration wells, those
costs are written-off and recorded as an expense.
Unproved oil and gas properties that are individually significant are
periodically assessed for impairment of value, and a loss is recognized at the
time of impairment by providing an impairment allowance. Other unproved
properties are amortized based on the Company's experience of successful
drilling and average holding period. Currently the Company holds no unproved
properties.
Capitalized costs of producing oil and gas properties, after considering
estimated dismantlement and abandonment costs and estimated salvage values, are
depreciated and depleted by the unit-of-production method. Significant
development projects are excluded from the depletion calculation prior to
assessment of the existence of proven reserves that are ready for commercial
production. Support equipment and other property and equipment are depreciated
over their estimated useful lives.
On the sale or retirement of a complete unit of a proved property, the cost and
related accumulated depreciation, depletion, and amortization are eliminated
from the property accounts, and the resulting gain or loss is recognized. On the
retirement or sale of a partial unit of proved property, the cost is charged to
accumulated depreciation, depletion, and amortization with a resulting gain or
loss recognized in income based on the amount of proceeds.
On the sale of an entire interest in an unproved property for cash or cash
equivalent, gain or loss on the sale is recognized, taking into consideration
the amount of any recorded impairment if the property had been assessed
individually. If a partial interest in an unproved property is sold, the amount
received is treated as a reduction of the cost of the interest retained.
Prior to July 1, 2004. all of the Company's oil and gas assets were held in one
cost center located in Siberia, Russia. The Russian Federation (RF) has
performed substantial exploration efforts on properties on which the Company has
received successful tenders for future exploration and development. As a result,
those areas accepted under tender by the RF are known to contain proved reserves
and the Company's efforts are focused on further development of such reserves.
The net carrying value of the Company's oil and gas properties was limited to an
estimated net recoverable amount. The net recoverable amount is based on
undiscounted future net revenues and is determined by applying factors based on
historical experience and other data such as primary lease terms of properties
and average holding periods. If it is determined that the net recoverable value
is less than the net carrying value of the oil and gas properties, any
impairment is charged to operations.
Inventories
- -----------
Inventory includes extracted oil physically in the pipeline prior to delivery
for sale and oil held by third parties valued at the cost of development.
Inventory also includes various supplies and spare parts and is valued at cost
using the weighted average method.
Property and Equipment
- ----------------------
Property and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation is provided utilizing the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives for owned assets, ranging
from 5 to 7 years.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
- -------------------------------
The Company evaluates its long-lived assets for impairment, in accordance with
the provisions established under Statement of SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets", when events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the related carrying amount may not be recoverable.
An impairment is considered to exist if the total estimated future cash flows on
an undiscounted basis is less than the carrying amount of the related assets. An
impairment loss is measured and recorded based on the discounted estimated
future cash flows. Changes in significant assumptions underlying future cash
flow estimates or fair values of assets may have a material effect on the
Company's financial position and results of operations.
Asset Retirement Obligations
- ----------------------------
During 2003 the Company applied the provisions of SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for
Asset Retirement Obligations." The Company recorded $126,500 as the fair value
of the Company's estimated liability for the retirement of its Russian oil and
gas assets along with a corresponding increase in the carrying value of the
related oil and gas properties as of December 31, 2003, as the effect of
adopting SFAS No. 143 on January 1, 2003 was not material. Had the Company
adopted SFAS No. 143 on January 1, 2002 the net loss to common shareholders
would have been increased by $13,000.
Stock-Based Compensation
- ------------------------
In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148 "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation- Transition and Disclosure." This statement amends SFAS No. 123,
"Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" to provide alternative methods of
transition for an entity that voluntarily changes to the fair value method of
accounting for stock-based compensation. In addition, SFAS 148 amends the
disclosure provision of SFAS 123 to require more prominent disclosure about the
effects of an entity's accounting policy decisions with respect to stock-based
employee compensation on reported results of operations. The Company has adopted
the disclosure-only provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation." Accordingly, no compensation
cost has been recognized for stock options issued to employees, officers and
directors under the stock option plan. Had compensation cost for the Company's
options issued to employees, officers and directors been determined based on the
fair value at the grant date for awards consistent with the provisions of SFAS
No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148, the Company's net loss and basic loss per
common share would have been changed to the pro forma amounts indicated below:
For the Years Ended December 31,
-------------------------------------------
2004 2003 2002
----------- ------------ ------------
Net income (loss) applicable to
common shareholders - as reported $ 7,190,301 $ (8,415,537) $(10,973,923)
Fair value of employee
compensation expense 3,512,305 4,974,141 972,041
----------- ------------ ------------
Net income (loss) applicable to
common shareholders - pro forma $ 3,677,996 $(13,389,678) $(11,945,964)
Basic income (loss) per common share
- as reported $ .73 $ (1.23) $ (3.53)
Basic income (loss) per common share
- pro forma $ .41 $ (1.96) $ (3.84)
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average
assumptions used:
For the Years Ended December 31,
-------------------------------------------
2004 2003 2002
----------- ------------ ------------
Approximate risk free rate 4.06% 4.00% --
Average expected life 10 years 10 years --
Dividend yield -% -% --
Volatility 55.0% 100% --
Estimated fair value of total options
granted $3,512,305 $4,974,141 --
Estimated fair value per option granted $2.48 $3.15 --
As described in Note 5, 994,000 options granted to the Board of Directors with
an estimated fair value of $2,465,120 under the Company's 2003 Stock Option Plan
have been treated as issued and outstanding.
Foreign Currency Translation
- ----------------------------
All assets and liabilities of the Company's subsidiary were translated into U.S.
dollars using the prevailing exchange rates as of the balance sheet date. Income
and expenses are translated using the weighted average exchange rates for the
period. Stockholders' investments are translated at the historical exchange
rates prevailing at the time of such investments. Any gains or losses from
foreign currency translation are included as a separate component of
stockholders' equity. The prevailing exchange rates at June 30, 2004 and
December 31, 2003 and 2002 were approximately 1 U.S. dollar to 29.03, 29.45 and
31.78, Russian rubles, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2004 and
the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, the average exchange rate for 1 U.S.
dollar was 28.76, 30.66 and 31.39, Russian rubles, respectively.
Basic Loss Per Share
- --------------------
The Company applies the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
No. 128, "Earnings Per Share" (FAS 128). All dilutive potential common shares
have an antidilutive effect on diluted per share amounts and therefore have been
excluded in determining net loss per share. The Company's basic and diluted loss
per share are equivalent and accordingly only basic loss per share has been
presented.
The following table reflects the effects of dilutive securities as of December
31:
2004 2003 2002
---- ---- ----
Dilutive effects of options 2,993,037 1,578,037 --
Dilutive effects of warrants 7,359,728 7,389,981 4,587,780
Dilutive effects of convertible
preferred shares 281,460 2,381,351 --
---------- ---------- ---------
10,634,224 11,349,369 4,587,780
========== ========== =========
Such securities have been excluded from the earnings per share calculation as
their effect was anti-dilutive. However, such securities could dilute future
earnings, if achieved. The 2002 and 2003 share and per share amounts have been
adjusted to reflect the 1 for 12 reverse split approved by the shareholders on
March 19, 2003.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
- -----------------------------------
The carrying amounts of financial instruments including cash, accounts payable
and accrued liabilities approximated fair value as of December 31, 2004 and 2003
because of the relatively short maturity of these instruments.
The Company is exposed to foreign currency risks to the extent that transactions
and balances are denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar.
Income Taxes
- ------------
The Company recognizes deferred tax liabilities and assets based on the
differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported
amounts in the financial statements that will result in taxable or deductible
amounts in future years. The measurement of deferred tax assets may be reduced
by a valuation allowance based upon management's assessment of available
evidence if it is deemed more likely than not some or all of the deferred tax
assets will not be realizable.
Reclassifications
- -----------------
Certain amounts in the 2002 and 2003 consolidated financial statements have been
reclassified to conform to the 2004 presentation.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
- -----------------------------------------
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS
No. 123 (revised 2004), "Share-Based Payment." SFAS No. 123R replaced SFAS No.
123 and superseded APB 25. SFAS No. 123R will require compensation cost related
to share-based payment transactions to be recognized in financial statements. As
permitted by SFAS No. 123, the Company elected to follow the guidance of APB 25,
which allowed companies to use the intrinsic value method of accounting to value
their share-based payment transactions with employees. Based on this method, the
Company did not recognize compensation expense in its financial statements as
the stock options granted had an exercise price equal to the fair market value
of the underlying Common Stock on the date of the grant. SFAS No. 123R requires
measurement of the cost of share-based payment transactions to employees at the
fair value of the award on the grant date and recognition of expense over the
requisite service or vesting period. SFAS No. 123R requires implementation using
a modified version of prospective application, under which compensation expense
for the unvested portion of previously granted awards and all new awards will be
recognized on or after the date of adoption. SFAS No. 123R also allows companies
to adopt SFAS No. 123R by restating previously issued financial statements,
basing the amounts on the expense previously calculated and reported in their
pro forma footnote disclosures required under SFAS No. 123. The Company has not
decided which adoption method will be used. The provisions of SFAS No. 123R will
be adopted by the Company effective July 1, 2005. The effect of the adoption of
SFAS No. 123R is expected to be comparable to that disclosed on a pro forma
basis as a result of applying the current fair value recognition provisions of
SFAS No. 123.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153 "Exchanges of Non-monetary
Assets--an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29." This Statement amended APB Opinion
No. 29 to eliminate the exception for non-monetary exchanges of similar
productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of
non-monetary assets that do not have commercial substance. A non-monetary
exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are
expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact of this new standard, but believes that it will
not have a material impact upon the Company's financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
Note 2 - Sale of Goloil
As described in Note 1, the Company considers the sale of Goloil to be effective
July 1, 2004. Accordingly, the operating activities of Goloil for the six months
ended June 30, 2004 and the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 have been
included in the results from discontinued operations, summarized as follows:
2004 2003 2002
---------- ----------- ----------
Sales $6,552,138 $11,437,802 $6,923,320
Cost of sales and expenses 7,072,272 12,604,234 7,319,997
---------- ----------- ----------
Loss from operations (520,134) (1,166,432) (396,677)
Other income (expense)
Interest expense (166,216) (347,740) (385,939)
---------- ----------- ----------
Net loss from discontinued operations,
before tax (686,350) (1,514,172) (782,616)
Income tax (16,829) (84,508) --
---------- ----------- ----------
Net loss from discontinued operations,
before gain on disposal (703,179) (1,598,680) (782,616)
Gain on sale of ZAO Goloil stock 13,086,761 -- --
---------- ----------- ----------
Income (loss) from discontinued operations $12,383,582 $(1,598,680) $ (782,616)
========== =========== ==========
The gain on sale of Goloil stock is calculated as follows:
Sale price for Goloil shares $ 8,960,229
Less direct transaction expenses:
Investment banking fee (750,000)
Net fees and expenses (246,779)
------------
Net proceeds 7,963,450
Net deficit of investment in Goloil
at date of sale 5,123,311
------------
Gain on disposal of ZAO Goloil $13,086,761
===========
Note 3 - Notes Payable
During 2003:
The Company received proceeds of $628,750 from the issuance of promissory notes
to three shareholders. In connection with these notes, 128,700 warrants valued
at $110,170 were issued. At December 31, 2003, the full amount of the discount
had been amortized and recorded as a non-cash financing charge. The Company has
recorded the value of these warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model using the following assumptions: volatility of 73%, a risk-free rate of
3.5%, zero dividend payments, and a life of one year.
The Company paid $478,750 of the promissory notes issued during the year. The
remaining $150,000 along with accrued interest of $9,426 were exchanged for
Teton's 8% convertible preferred shares.
During 2002:
The scheduled March 1, 2002 principal payments on two notes payable totaling
$250,000 to stockholders were extended to April 15, 2002. In exchange for this
extension, the holders were issued 10,417 stock purchase warrants, with an
exercise price of $6.00 that expired February 2004, which had been valued at
$14,469 using the Black Scholes option pricing model with assumptions of
volatility of 100%, risk free rate of 5.5% and no dividend yield. These
extensions were recorded in the first quarter of 2002 as financing costs. These
notes were fully paid off in 2002.
The Company issued 143,678 warrants in connection with related party notes
payable of $450,000 and $50,000. The warrants were valued at $156,781 and
recorded as financing costs. Additionally, in the first quarter of 2002, the due
dates of the two notes payable totaling $500,000 were extended by the holders to
April 15, 2002. As consideration for this extension the Company agreed to modify
the expiration dates of certain warrants previously held by the note holders
from October 31, 2002 to January 31, 2003. These extensions were valued based
upon the incremental fair value of the warrants on the date of modification,
which totaled approximately $32,000. The values were calculated using the Black
Scholes option-pricing model under the assumptions described in the previous
paragraph, and were recorded in the first quarter of 2002, the quarter the
modifications occurred.
During 2002, the Company paid $200,000 of a $450,000 note payable outstanding at
December 31, 2001. The remaining $250,000 was converted into a convertible
debenture with 83,333 warrants also being issued in connection with the
Company's private placement offering of convertible debentures.
The Company also paid off a $50,000 note payable to a stockholder and the
$94,210 note payable to an officer during 2002, which were outstanding at
December 31, 2001.
During 2002, the Company received proceeds of $300,000 on a note payable from a
stockholder. In connection with the note, 41,667 warrants valued at $150,016
were issued and recorded as financing charges. The Company paid off this note in
November 2002. The Company has recorded the value of these warrants using the
Black Scholes option-pricing model using the following assumptions: volatility
of 138%, a risk-free rate of 4.5%, zero dividend payments, and a life of 2
years.
Note 4 - Stockholders' Equity
Total expense recorded associated with the above warrant issuances and
modifications totaled $353,379 and have been recorded as non-cash financing
charges during the year ended December 31, 2002.
Changes in Stockholders' Equity during 2004
- -------------------------------------------
Private Placements of Common Stock
During the year ended December 31, 2004, 45,925 common shares were issued for
(i) the settlement of accrued liabilities of $58,700; and (ii) services provided
by consultants of $43,329 and (iii) services provided by the advisory board of
$58,000.
50,000 warrants were issued to settle a liability at December 31, 2003 valued at
$46,967. We also issued 100,000 warrants to a consultant valued at $102,094 for
services.
Private Placements of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock
The Company received the following proceeds from the issuance of privately
placed preferred stock at a price of $4.35 per share:
Proceeds of $499,998 (net of cash costs of $50,000) from the issuance of 126,436
shares of 8% convertible preferred stock.
The preferred stock carries an 8% dividend, payable quarterly commencing January
1, 2004 and is convertible into common stock at a price of $4.35 per share. The
preferred stock is entitled to vote on all matters presented to the Company's
common stockholders, with the number of votes being equal to the number of
underlying common shares. The preferred stock also contains a liquidation
preference of $4.35 per share plus accrued unpaid dividends. The preferred stock
can be redeemed by the Company after one year for $4.35 per share upon proper
notice of redemption being provided by the Company.
Changes in Stockholders' Equity during 2003
- -------------------------------------------
On March 19, 2003, the stockholders authorized an increase in the Company's
common shares from 100,000,000 to 250,000,000 and authorized 25,000,000 shares
of preferred stock for future issuance. In addition, the stockholders approved a
1 to 12 reverse stock split.
Private Placements of Common Stock
During the year ended December 31, 2003 the Company received the following
proceeds from the issuance of privately placed common stock:
$1,091,900 (net of costs of $98,100) from the issuance of 437,012 shares of
common stock. In connection with the private placement, the Company also issued
a warrant for each $3.00 stock investment. The warrants have a term of two years
and an exercise price of $6.00,
$1,939,610 during the year ended December 31, 2003 related to outstanding stock
subscriptions receivable at December 31, 2002,
80,828 common shares valued at $317,902 were issued for (i) settlement of
accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $220,000; and (ii) services provided
by the advisory board of $97,902.
Private Placements of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock
- ----------------------------------------------------------
During the year ended December 31, 2003 the Company received the following
proceeds from the issuance of privately placed preferred stock issued at an
offering price of $4.35 per share.
Proceeds of $9,145,450 (net of cash costs of $473,888 and net of $46,968 related
to the obligation to issue warrants for capital raising) from the issuance of
2,266,680 shares of 8% convertible preferred stock.
$14,574 from the issuance of 40,000 preferred shares in exchange for a $150,000
note payable outstanding and accrued interest of $9,426.
We also issued 12,000 preferred shares to a consultant for capital raising
services valued at $52,200.
The preferred shares carry an 8% dividend, payable quarterly commencing January
1, 2004 and are convertible into common stock at a price of $4.35 per share. The
preferred stock is entitled to vote on all matters presented to the Company's
common stockholders, with the number of votes being equal to the number of
underlying common shares. The preferred stock also contains a liquidation
preference of $4.35 per share plus accrued unpaid dividends. The preferred
shares can be redeemed by the Company after one year for $4.35 per share, under
certain circumstances and upon proper notice of redemption being provided by the
Company.
In connection with the preferred share private placement for Tranches 1 and 2,
certain placements were entered into when the underlying price of the common
stock to which the preferred shares are convertible into, exceeded $4.35, the
stated conversion rate. As a result of the underlying shares being in-the-money,
the Company was required to compute a beneficial conversion charge, which is
calculated as the difference between the conversion price of $4.35 and the
closing stock price on the effective date of each offering, multiplied by the
total of the related common shares to be issued upon conversion of the preferred
stock. These charges are reflected as a dividend to the preferred shareholders
and are recognized over the period in which the preferred stock first becomes
convertible. For the Tranche 1 shares the charge was immediately recognized as
the shares were immediately convertible into common. For Tranche 2 the shares
could not be converted until a shareholder vote on January 27, 2004 took place
approving the issuance of additional common shares. The calculated beneficial
conversion feature on Tranche 2 was therefore amortized from the effective date
of each issuance through January 27, 2004. This resulted in total beneficial
conversion charges of $ 1,182,452, of which $1,063,842 were recorded during the
fourth quarter of 2003, and $118,610 will be amortized and recorded as preferred
dividends in January of 2004.
The Company also sent each preferred shareholder an inducement offer to convert
their shares of preferred into common shares. If converted within 60 days of
closing, the investors were entitled to receive (i) dividends payable in common
stock equivalent to one year's worth of dividends; and (ii) Class B Warrants to
purchase two shares of common stock for each $10 invested, exercisable at $6.00
per share.
In connection with the preferred share private placement for Tranche 1,
shareholders converted 1,645,099 of 8% convertible preferred shares to common
stock at a price of $4.35 per share. Common share dividends of 8% for a full
year were paid totaling $546,173 and 1,431,237 warrants were issued valued at
$1,170,678, for a total inducement charge of $1,716,851 recognized as a
preferred dividend during the fourth quarter for those investors which accepted
the inducement offer. The warrants issued were valued using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model using the following assumptions: volatility of 55%, a
risk-free rate of 1.875%, zero dividend payments, and a life of two years.
In connection with the preferred share private placement for Tranche 2, a common
share dividend of 8% for a full year was paid totaling $157,601 and warrants
were issued valued at $337,805, for a total inducement charge of $495,406 which
will be recognized as a preferred dividend in the first quarter of 2004,
associated with the preferred stock inducement offer ending on March 27, 2004.
The warrants issued were valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model
using the following assumptions: volatility of 55%, a risk-free rate of 1.875%,
zero dividend payments, and a life of two years.
Warrants to Purchase Common Shares
- ----------------------------------
During 2003, the Company issued 440,140 warrants to entities for their services
directly related to raising capital under private placements. The Company also
issued 128,700 warrants in conjunction with debt valued at $110,170.
During 2003, the Company issued 1,019,883 warrants in connection with common
stock private placement offerings, with an exercise price of $6.00 that expire
December 30, 2004.
Changes in Stockholders' Equity during 2002
- -------------------------------------------
Private Placements of Common Stock
During the year ended December 31, 2002 the Company received the following
proceeds from the issuance of privately placed common stock:
$3,333,460 from the issuance of 1,223,737 shares of common stock. In connection
with the private placement offerings, the Company also issued a warrant for each
$3.00 stock investment. The warrants have a term of two years and an exercise
price of $6.00.
$605,136 from the issuance of 221,198 common shares issued for consulting
services.
$23,200 from the issuance of 7,407 common shares for services provided in 2001.
The Company accrued a liability for this amount at December 31, 2002.
Convertible Debentures
During 2002, the Company received proceeds of $4,163,143 from the private
placement of convertible debentures. The debentures had a term of three years
from April 1, 2002 and provided for interest at 10% per annum payable annually.
The debentures provided that the holder may convert the debenture and accrued
interest into shares of common stock at a $3 conversion rate.
The debentures also included warrants to purchase common stock and have an
exercise price of $6 and a term of two years. Each debenture holder received one
warrant for each $.25 (pre-split) of investment made in debentures.
On September 1, 2002, the Company redeemed all debentures outstanding for shares
of its common stock. The debentures were redeemed at 110% of their face value by
issuing one share of common stock for each $3 of redemption value, which also
incorporates any accrued interest through September 1, 2002. Financing charges
were recorded for the difference between the cumulative 10% contractual interest
accrued through September 1, 2002 and the 10% premium paid upon redemption,
which totaled $466,771.
As a result of the warrants issued with the debentures and in-the-money
conversion features present at issuance, non-cash financing charges of
$4,714,625 were expensed. While the stock to which the conversion rights and
warrants apply is restricted stock, the valuation with respect to this stock in
calculating the discount was "as if" the stock was immediately salable. The
effect of this is to make the amount of discount and its related amortization
higher than it would otherwise have been. Management believes these costs are
non-recurring and will manage future capital raising programs to minimize or
eliminate these costs.
Warrants to Purchase Common Shares
During 2002, the Company issued 133,333 warrants to consultants for services
valued at $215,086. The Company also issued 616,793 to employees and directors
for services performed.
The following table presents the activity for warrants outstanding:
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Shares Price
------------ ------------
Outstanding - December 31, 2001 544,098 $ 5.28
Granted 4,068,682 5.52
Forfeited/canceled (25,000) 2.04
------------ ------------
Outstanding - December 31, 2002 4,587,780 5.52
Granted 3,210,249 2.49
Forfeited/canceled (408,048) 0.30
------------ ------------
Outstanding - December 31, 2003 7,389,981 5.63
Granted 4,496,142 6.00
Forfeited/canceled (4,526,396) 5.98
------------ ------------
Outstanding - December 31, 2004 7,359,727 $ 5.62
============ ============
On May 11, 2004 the Board of Directors voted to extend by one year the
expiration date of certain warrants issued during the period from April 1, 2002
to December 15, 2003, with no change in the exercise price of $6.00. The above
table includes the extension as an expiration and grant of such warrants.
The following table presents the composition of warrants outstanding and
exercisable:
2004
Shares Outstanding
Range of Exercise Prices Number Price* Life*
------------------------ ---------- ------ ------
$2.72 - $3.48 903,271 $ .36 0.79
$4.35 - $6.00 6,414,788 5.20 0.68
$9.00 - $12.00 41,668 .06 0.01
--------- ------ ------
Total - December 31 7,359,72 $ 5.62 1.48
========= ====== ======
*Price and Life reflect the weighted average exercise price and weighted average
remaining contractual life, respectively.
Note 5 - Stock Options
At the annual meeting on March 19, 2003, the Company's shareholders approved an
employee stock option plan and authorized 25,000,000 shares of Common Stock for
issuance thereunder. At the same annual meeting at which the 2003 Plan was
adopted, the Company's shareholders also approved a 1:12 reverse split. Although
the Board of Directors believed that a reasonable interpretation of both actions
indicated that since the 2003 Plan was adopted at the same shareholders meeting
as the reverse split and further since there were no shares technically
outstanding at the time of the reverse split's approval, that no adjustment need
be made to the plan, it nevertheless elected to take a conservative approach and
to remove any ambiguity by asking the stockholders, at the Company's 2005 annual
meeting, to approve a total pool of 3,000,000 options available for grant under
the 2003 plan.
Under the plan, incentive and non-qualified options may be granted. During the
second quarter of 2003, the Company issued 30,000 non-qualified options to
outside advisory board members which has been recorded as compensation expense
during the three-months ended June 30, 2003 valued at $94,701, using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: volatility of
100%, a risk-free rate of 4%, zero dividend payments, and a life of ten years.
On April 9, 2003 the Company issued 1,448,037 incentive options to employees,
officers and directors valued at $4,571,026 using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model under the same assumptions described above. On August 3,
2003, 100,000 options valued at $308,414 were issued to a director under the
Company Plan. On March 30, 2004 1,415,000 options valued at $3,512,305 using the
same assumptions as above were issued to employees, officers and directors. The
Board issued the options in 2004 with the understanding that they would seek
clarification from shareholders as to the ultimate number of options that can be
issued. Accordingly, 994,000 of the options representing approximately
$2,500,000 of the fair value of the total options granted could be voided if the
shareholders do not approve an increase in the number of authorized shares
available for issuance under the 2003 Employee Stock option plan.
As of December 31, 2004, 1,478,037 options with an exercise price of $3.48,
100,000 options with an exercise price of $3.71 and 1,415,000 options with an
exercise price of $3.60 were outstanding. The weighted average fair value and
contractual life of these issues were $2.48, $3.26 and $3.71 and 10.00, 8.59 and
..61 years, respectively.
The following table presents the activity for stock options outstanding and exercisable:
Shares Outstanding
-----------------------------
Range of Exercise Prices Number Price* Life*
- ------------------------ ----------- ------------- -------------
Outstanding - December 31, 2002 - $ - -
Issued 1,578,037 3.49 8.30
----------- ------------- -------------
Outstanding - December 31, 2003 1,578,037 $ 3.49 8.30
Issued 1,415,000 3.60 9.25
------------ ------------- ------------
Outstanding - December 31, 2004 2,993,037 $ 3.54 8.70
============ ============= ============
*Price and Life reflect the weighted average exercise price and weighted average
remaining contractual life, respectively.
Note 6 - Income and Other Taxes
The provision for income taxes from continuing operations consists of the
following components:
2004 2003 2002
---- ---- ----
Current:
--------
Federal -- -- --
State -- -- --
-- -- --
Total -- -- --
current
Deferred:
Federal -- -- --
State -- -- --
-- -- --
Total -- -- --
Deferred
Total income tax expense from continuing operations differed from the amounts
computed by applying the federal statutory income tax rate of 35% to earnings
(loss) before income taxes as a result of the following items for the years
ended December 31:
2004 2003 2002
---- ---- ----
Federal statutory income tax benefit
from continuing operations $(1,817,648) $(1,412,657) $(3,566,957)
State income tax benefit, net of
federal income tax benefit from
continuing operations (154,367) (116,088) (326,347)
Change in valuation allowance 1,955,312 1,470,453 4,133,733
Other 16,703 58,292 (240,429)
----------- ----------- -----------
Income tax expense -- -- --
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant
components of the Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31,
2004 and 2003 are as follows:
2004 2003
---- ----
Current Deferred Tax Assets
(Liabilities)
Other receivables (7,441) (4,574)
Prepaid expenses (30,908) (36,363)
A/P and accrued liabilities 156,463 143,043
Charitable contributions -- 4,088
Valuation allowance (118,114) (106,194)
-------- --------
Net current deferred
tax asset (liability) -- --
Non-Current Deferred Tax Assets
(Liabilities)
Depreciation (3,623) (3,462)
Net Operating Loss 4,478,522 7,107,951
Valuation allowance (4,474,899) (7,104,489)
--------- ----------
Net non-current
deferred tax
asset (liability) -- --
Net Deferred Tax Asset
(Liability) $ -- $ --
========== ==========
At December 31, 2004, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards, for
federal income tax purposes, of approximately $11.8 million. These net operating
loss carryforwards, if not utilized to reduce taxable income in future periods,
will expire in various amounts beginning in 2018 through 2023. Such net
operating loss is subject to U.S. Internal Revenue Code Section 382 limitations.
Utilization of the NOL is limited to approximately $900,000 per annum.
The Company has established a valuation allowance for deferred taxes that
reduces its net deferred tax assets as management currently believes that these
losses will not be utilized in the near term. The allowance recorded was $4.6
million and $7.2 million for 2004 and 2003 respectively. The Company reduced the
valuation allowance in 2004 by approximately $2.6 million due to the utilization
of net operating loss carryforwards.
Note 7 - Commitments
Mr. Howard Cooper, Director, signed an employment contract on January 1, 2004
and then, upon his resignation as Executive Chairman, signed a consulting
agreement with the Company dated March 1, 2005 to replace the employment
contract. The consulting agreement is for a one year term, whereby Mr. Cooper
will receive bi-monthly base payments of $8,333 each. Under the terms of the
agreement, if Mr. Cooper is terminated other than for cause, Mr. Cooper is
entitled to 12 months of severance pay, payable in bi-monthly installments over
12 months, from the date of termination. The Company may discontinue the
severance payments if Mr. Cooper violates the confidentiality, noncompetition,
or nonsolicitation provisions of his employment agreement.
Mr. Arleth, President and Chief Executive Officer, signed an employment
agreement on May 1, 2003. The agreement is for a three-year term, with an
initial salary of $10,000 per month that was increased to $15,000 per month
beginning in January 2004. Under the terms of the agreement, Mr. Arleth is
entitled to 24 months severance pay in the event of a change of position or
control of the Company.
Note 8 - Subsequent Events
On January 5, 2005 the Company entered into a definitive purchase and sale
agreement for the acquisition of certain oil and gas leases covering up to
180,000 acres in North America. The closing of the transaction is subject to the
satisfactory results of a due diligence investigation and delivery by the
sellers of at least 138,063 acres with acceptable title and environmental
conditions. The transaction is currently pending and the terms are being kept
confidential subject to a request for confidential treatment previously filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company paid a nonrefundable
deposit of $25,000 in December upon signing a letter of intent. Earnest money of
$322,000 was paid in January upon signing the purchase and sale agreement. The
balance due in cash, stock and warrants will be paid at closing. The Company
expects to close the transaction on or before April 15, 2005.
On February 15, 2005, the Company signed a membership interest purchase
agreement with PGR Partners, LLC ("PGR") whereby the Company acquired 25% of the
membership interest in Piceance Gas Resources, LLC, a Colorado limited liability
company ("Piceance LLC"). Piceance LLC owns certain oil and gas rights and
leasehold assets covering approximately 6,300 acres in the Piceance Basin in
Western Colorado. The properties owned by Piceance LLC carry a net revenue
interest of 78.75%.
The purchase price for the membership interest in Piceance LLC was $5.25 million
in cash, the issuance of 450,000 unregistered shares of our common stock, which
had a fair market value on the date of closing of $720,000, and the issuance of
warrants to purchase 200,000 shares of our common stock, exercisable for a
period of five years at an exercise price of $2.00 per share. Pursuant to the
terms of the operating agreement, the Company is obligated to fund its share of
the construction of a road on the leased area and 8 wells to be drilled during
2005.
On February 22, 2005, Mr. Cooper resigned as Executive Chairman of the Company.
Mr. Cooper will remain on the Company's Board and will stand for reelection at
the Company's upcoming annual meeting in May. In addition, Mr. Cooper will
remain a consultant to the Company. On February 22, 2005, our Board elected
James J. Woodcock, an outside director, as non-executive chairman of the
Company.
Note 9 - Supplemental Oil and Gas Disclosures
The following is a summary of costs incurred in oil and gas producing
activities:
The Company sold its oil and gas producing activities during 2004. See Notes 1
and 2 to the financial statements.
Included below is the Company's investment and activity in oil and gas producing
activities prior to the sale, which includes a proportionate share of ZAO
Goloil's oil and gas properties, revenues, and costs.
For the Years Ended
December 31,
-----------------------------------------------
2004 2003 2002
----------- ----------- -----------
Construction in progress $ - $ 1,700,696 $ -
Development costs 2,988,882 5,207,931 4,150,742
----------- ----------- -----------
Total $ 2,988,882 $ 6,908,627 $ 4,150,742
=========== =========== ===========
The following reflects the Company's capitalized costs associated with oil and
gas producing activities:
For the Years Ended
December 31,
---------------------------------------------
2004 2003 2002
----------- ----------- -----------
Property acquisition costs $ - $ 595,558 $ 595,558
Construction in progress - 1,700,696 -
Development costs - 10,808,813 4,830,421
------------ ----------- -----------
- 13,105,067 5,425,979
Accumulated depreciation, depletion,
amortization and valuation
allowances - (2,064,585) (529,671)
------------ ----------- -----------
Net capitalized costs $ - $11,040,482 $ 4,896,308
============ =========== ===========
Results of Operations from Oil and Gas Producing Activities
- -----------------------------------------------------------
Results of operations from oil and gas producing activities (excluding general
and administrative expense, and interest expense) are presented as follows: For
the Years Ended December 31, 2004 2003 2002
Oil and gas sales $ 6,552,138 $11,437,802 $ 6,923,320
Oil and gas production (1,331,273) (2,020,447) (1,218,411)
Transportation and marketing -- (807,266) (611,956)
Export duties - (1,492,999) (910,936)
Taxes other than income taxes (4,286,025) (5,864,920 (3,537,990)
Depletion, depreciation and
amortization (747,481) (1,534,914) (451,930)
----------- ----------- -----------
Results of operations from oil and
gas producing activities $ 187,359 $ (282,744) $ 192,097
=========== =========== ===========
Reserves (Unaudited)
- ---------------------
Proved oil and gas reserves are the estimated quantities of crude oil, natural
gas, and natural gas liquids which geological and engineering data demonstrate
with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known
reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions. Proved development
oil and gas reserves are those reserves expected to be recovered through
existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods. The reserve data
is based on studies prepared by an independent engineer. All proved reserves of
oil and gas are located in Russia.
For the Years Ended
December 31,
-------------------------------------------
2004 2003 2002
----------- ----------- -----------
Proved reserves (bbls), beginning of
period 8,262,000 13,264,000 40,174,000
Production (348,000) (632,000) (471,000)
Extension of reservoir - - 2,000,000
Sale of reserves in place (7,914,000)
Revisions of previous estimates - (4,370,000) (28,439,000)
---------- ---------- -----------
Proved reserves (bbls), end of period - 8,262,000 13,264,000
========== ========= ==========
Proved developed reserves (bbls),
beginning of period 3,816,000 4,567,000 5,493,000
========== ========= =========
Proved developed reserves (bbls), end
of period - 3,816,000 4,567,000
========== ========= =========
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows (Unaudited)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------
SFAS No. 69 prescribes guidelines for computing a standardized measure of future
net cash flows and changes therein relating to estimated proved reserves. The
Company has followed these guidelines, which are briefly discussed below.
Future cash inflows and future production and development costs are determined
by applying year-end prices and costs to the estimated quantities of oil and gas
to be produced. Estimated future income taxes are computed using current
statutory income tax rates for those countries where production occurs. The
resulting future net cash flows are reduced to present value amounts by applying
a 10% annual discount factor.
The assumptions used to compute the standardized measure are those prescribed by
the Financial Accounting Standards Board and, as such, do not necessarily
reflect the Company's expectations for actual revenues to be derived from those
reserves nor their present worth. The limitations inherent in the reserve
quantity estimation process, as discussed previously, are equally applicable to
the standardized measure computations since these estimates are the basis for
the valuation process.
The following summarizes the standardized measure and sets forth the Company's
future net cash flows relating to proved oil and gas reserves based on the
standardized measure prescribed in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 69.
For the Years Ended
December 31,
-----------------------------------------------
2004 2003 2002
-------------- ------------- -------------
Future cash inflows $ -- $ 114,992,000 $ 230,581,000
Future production costs -- (80,812,000) (151,167,000)
Future development costs -- (14,595,000) (18,556,000)
Future income tax expense -- (7,360,000) (16,365,000)
-------------- ------------- -------------
Future net cash flows
(undiscounted) -- 12,225,000 44,493,000
Annual discount of 10% for
estimated timing of cash flows -- (6,232,000) (19,069,000)
-------------- ------------- -------------
Standardized measure of future
net discounted cash flows $ -- $ 5,993,000 $ 25,424,000
============== ============= =============
Changes in Standardized Measure Base Case (Unaudited)
- -----------------------------------------------------
The following are the principal sources of change in the standardized measure of
discounted future net cash flows:
For the Years Ended
December 31,
-----------------------------------------------
2004 2003 2002
-------------- ------------- -------------
Standardized measure, beginning of
period, $ 5,993,000 $ 25,424,000 $ 40,362,000
Net changes in prices and production
costs -- (11,038,000) 190,619,000
Sales of oil and gas produced during
period (935,000) (445,000) (644,000)
Future development costs -- (3,098,000) 22,344,000
Revisions of previous quantity
estimates -- (11,806,000) (274,605,000)
Extension of reservoir -- -- 19,867,000
Accretion of discount 299,950 2,542,000 4,036,000
Sale of reserves in place (5,357,950) -- --
Changes in income taxes, net -- 4,414,000 23,445,000
-------------- ------------- -------------
Standardized measure, end of period $ -- $ 5,993,000 $ 25,424,000
============== ============= =============
Note 10 - Selected Quarterly Information (Unaudited)
The following represents selected quarterly financial information for the years
ended December 31, 2003 and 2004. Certain amounts have been reclassified to
conform with the presentation in this Form 10-K.
For the Quarter Ended
2004 March 31, June 30, Sept 30, (1) December 31,
- ---- --------- -------- ------------ ------------
Loss from continuing $ (2,086,915) $ (1,712,408) $ (488,126) $ (905,832)
operations
Discontinued operations, net
of tax (435,198) (267,981) 13,086,761 --
------------ ------------ ----------- -----------
Net Income (Loss) (2,522,113) (1,980,389) 12,598,635 (905,832)
Basic and diluted loss per
common share for continuing $ (0.30) $ (0.19) $ (.07) $ (.09)
operations
Basic and diluted income
(loss) per common share $ (.05) $ (.03) $ 1.45 $ .00
for discontinued operations
Basic and diluted income
(loss) per common share $ (.35) $ (.22) $ 1.38 $ (.10)
2003
- ----
Loss from continuing $ (773,774) $ (981,898) $ (984,080) $(1,296,412)
operations
Discontinued operations, net
of tax (7,311) (465,342) (768,087) (357,940)
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net Income (Loss) (781,085) (1,447,240) (1,752,167) (1,654,352)
Basic and diluted loss per
common share for continuing
operations $ (0.12) $ (0.15) $ (0.15) $ (0.58)
Basic and diluted income
(loss) per common share
for discontinued operations $ (0.00) $ (0.07) $ (0.11) $ (0.05)
Basic and diluted income
(loss) per common share $ (0.12) $ (0.22) $ (0.26) $ (0.63)
(1) The gain from the sale of Goloil stock included in results from discontinued
operations for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 has been adjusted by
approximately $718,000 due to an error in recording the foreign currency
translation account at the time of the sale, partially offset by an over accrual
of current income taxes due.
Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of December 31, 2004, an evaluation was performed by our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation,
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures were not completely effective as of December
31, 2004.
In connection with the audit of the year ended December 31, 2004, there were no
"reportable events" except that the Company's auditors reported to the Company's
Audit Committee that the auditors' considered one matter involving the internal
controls over financial reporting to be a material weakness, which concerned
accounting for complex equity transactions.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
Item 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Directors, executive officers, and significant employees of Teton, their
respective ages and positions with Teton are as follows:
Name Age Position
James J. Woodcock 66 Chairman & Director
Karl F. Arleth 56 President and CEO, Director
John T. Connor, Jr. 63 Director
Thomas F. Conroy 66 Director
H. Howard Cooper 48 Director
Patrick A. Quinn 51 Chief Financial Officer
JAMES J. WOODCOCK has been a director since 2002 and Chairman of the Company's
Compensation Committee, since 2003 and Chairman of the Company since February
2005. Since 1981, Mr. Woodcock has been the owner and CEO of Hy-Bon Engineering
Company, based in Midland, Texas. Hy-Bon is an engineering firm and manufacturer
of vapor recovery, gas boosters, and casing pressure reduction systems for the
oil industry. From 1997 to 2002, Mr. Woodcock was the chairman of Transrepublic
Resources, a private oil and gas exploration firm located in Midland Texas.
Since 1996, Mr. Woodcock has been a board member of Renovar Energy, a private
waste to energy firm located in Midland Texas and was its Chairman of the Board
until 2003.
KARL F. ARLETH, has been our president and CEO since May 2003 and a director
since 2002. From 2002 to 2003, Mr. Arleth was the Chief Operating Officer and a
Board Member of Sefton Resources, an oil and gas exploration and production
company. Between 1999 and 2001 he served as Chairman and CEO of Eurogas Inc. in
London. Ending in 1999, Mr. Arleth spent 21 years with Amoco and BP-Amoco. In
1998 he chaired the Board of the Azerbaijan International Operating Company
(AIOC) for BP-Amoco in Baku, Azerbaijan. Concurrently in 1997-98, he was also
President of Amoco Caspian Sea Petroleum Ltd. in Azerbaijan. In 1997, he served
as Director of Strategic Planning for Amoco Corporations Worldwide Exploration
and Production Sector in Chicago. From 1992 to 1996 Mr. Arleth was President of
Amoco Poland Ltd. in Warsaw, Poland. Between 1977 and 1992, Mr. Arleth held
positions with Amoco as an exploration and development geologist, project
supervisor, manager and executive in the Exploration and Production sector in
Denver, Tulsa, Chicago and Houston. In North America, he has significant
exploration and production experience in the Rocky Mountains, mid-continent, the
western U.S. and Alaska.
JOHN T. CONNOR, Jr. became a director in 2003 and chairs the Board's audit
committee. He is the Founder and Portfolio Manager of the Third Millennium
Russia Fund, a US based mutual fund specializing in the equities of Russian
public companies. A former attorney at Cravath, Swaine & Moore in New York City,
he has been a partner in leading law firms in New York, Washington and New
Jersey. Mr. Connor is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.
THOMAS F. CONROY, has been a director since 2002. Mr. Conroy is a Certified
Public Accountant with an MBA from the University of Chicago. Since August 2004,
Mr. Conroy has been the Chairman of Mann-Conroy-Eisenberg & Assoc. LLC, a life
insurance and reinsurance consulting firm. Since 2001, Mr. Conroy has been a
managing principal of Strategic Reinsurance Consultants International LLC, a
life reinsurance consulting and brokerage firm. Ending in 2001, Mr. Conroy,
spent 27 years with ING and its predecessor organizations, serving in various
financial positions and leading two of its strategic business units as
President. As President of ING Reinsurance, he established their international
presence, setting up facilities in The Netherlands, Bermuda, Ireland and Japan.
He also served as an Officer and Board Member of Security Life of Denver
Insurance Company and its subsidiaries. Mr. Conroy briefly served as our interim
CFO and secretary from April 2002 until April 2003.
H. HOWARD COOPER, H. Howard Cooper was our chairman from 1996 until February
2005. Mr. Cooper was our president and CEO from 1996 until May 2003. Mr. Cooper
founded American Tyumen in November 1996. He served as a director and president
of American Tyumen until the merger with the Company. In 1994, he was a
principal with Central Asian Petroleum, an oil and gas company with its primary
operations in Kazakhstan, located in Denver, Colorado. From 1992 to 1994 Mr.
Cooper served with AIG, an insurance group in New York. Prior to founding Teton,
Mr. Cooper was an independent landman, from 1981 - 1991, who developed oil and
gas opportunities in the U.S. Rocky Mountain Region.
PATRICK A. QUINN, CPA, CVA. Mr. Quinn joined Teton in February 2004 to serve as
the Company's Chief Financial Officer on a contract basis. For the past fifteen
years Mr. Quinn has been the CEO of Quinn & Associates, P.C.. Mr. Quinn provides
accounting, tax and auditing services primarily to the oil and gas industry. As
a result, Mr. Quinn has extensive experience in U.S. oil and gas operations,
including the Rocky Mountain, Mid-continent and Gulf Coast regions. He has
provided accounting and tax services to Teton since its inception. In addition,
Mr. Quinn has extensive experience in international oil and gas operations
including serving as the Controller of Hamilton Oil Corporation from 1978
through 1986, which was the first company to produce oil in the U.K. sector of
the North Sea.
All directors serve as directors for a term of one year or until his successor
is elected and qualified. All officers hold office until the first meeting of
the board of directors after the annual meeting of stockholders next following
his election or until his successor is elected and qualified. A director or
officer may also resign at any time.
COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Board of Directors has a Compensation Committee, an Audit Committee and a
Governance and Nominating Committee. The Compensation Committee and Audit
Committee currently consist of two directors John Connor, who is the Audit
Committee financial expert, and James J. Woodcock. The Nominating Committee is
made up of Mr. Woodcock and Mr. Conroy.
John Connor, James Woodcock and Tom Conroy are the board members determined to
be independent under American Stock Exchange listing standards.
The purpose of the Compensation Committee is to review the Company's
compensation of its executives, to make determinations relative thereto and to
submit recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect thereto in order
to ensure that such officers and directors receive adequate and fair
compensation. The Compensation Committee met three times by teleconference
during the last fiscal year.
The Audit Committee is responsible for the general oversight of audit, legal
compliance and potential conflict of interest matters, including (a)
recommending the engagement and termination of the independent public
accountants to audit the financial statements of the Company, (b) overseeing the
scope of the external audit services, (c) reviewing adjustments recommended by
the independent public accountant and addressing disagreements between the
independent public accountants and management, (d) reviewing the adequacy of
internal controls and management's handling of identified material inadequacies
and reportable conditions in the internal controls over financial reporting and
compliance with laws and regulations, and (e) supervising the internal audit
function, which may include approving the selection, compensation and
termination of internal auditors.
For the fiscal year ended 2004, the Audit Committee conducted discussions with
management and the independent auditor regarding the acceptability and the
quality of the accounting principles used in the reports in accordance with
Statements on Accounting Standards (SAS) No. 61. These discussions included the
clarity of the disclosures made therein, the underlying estimates and
assumptions used in the financial reporting and the reasonableness of the
significant judgments and management decisions made in developing the financial
statements. In addition, the Audit Committee discussed with the independent
auditor the matters in the written disclosures required by Independence
Standards Board Standard No. 1.
For the fiscal year ended 2004, the Audit Committee has also discussed with
management and its independent auditors issues related to the overall scope and
objectives of the audits conducted, the internal controls used by the Company,
and the selection of the Company's independent auditor. Additional meetings were
held with the independent auditor, with financial management present, to discuss
the specific results of audit investigations and examinations and the auditor's
judgments regarding any and all of the above issues.
The Audit Committee met four times by teleconference during 2004.
As provided in the Governance and Nominating Committee's charter and our
Company's corporate governance principles, the Governance and Nominating
Committee is responsible for identifying
individuals qualified to become Directors. The Governance and Nominating
Committee seeks to identify director candidates based on input provided by a
number of sources, including (a) the Governance and Nominating Committee
members, (b) our other Directors, (c) our stockholders,
(d) our Chief Executive Officer or Chairman, and (e) third parties such as professional
search firms. In evaluating potential candidates for director, the Governance and
Nominating Committee considers the entirety of each candidate's credentials.
Code of Ethics
The Company has adopted its Code of Ethics and Business Conduct that applies to
all of the officers, directors and employees of the Company. The Code is posted
on our website (www.tetonpetroleum.com). We will disclose on our website any
waivers of, or amendments to, our Code.
Compliance with Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act
Section 16(b) of the 1934 Act requires that the Company's Directors and certain
of its officers file reports of ownership and changes of ownership of the
Company stock with the SEC and AMEX. Based solely on copies of such reports
provided to the Company, the Company believes that all Directors and officers
filed on a timely basis all such reports required of them with respect to stock
ownership and changes in ownership during 2004 except that Messrs. Arleth,
Conroy, Connor, Cooper and Woodcock were late in reporting the grant of stock
options under the 2003 Employee Stock Option Plan.
Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation received
by Mr. Howard Cooper, the Chairman of Teton, and Mr. Karl Arleth who served as
its president and chief executive officer during 2004 (Mr. Cooper and Mr.
Arleth, the "named executive officers"):
Summary Compensation Table
Annual Compensation Long Term Compensation
------------------- ----------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Awards Payouts
------ -------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Securities
Other Underlying All
Name & Annual Restricted Options LTIP Other
Principal Salary Bonus Compen- Stock SARs Payouts Compen-
Position Year ($) ($) sation($) awards (#) ($) sation
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
H. Howard 2004 200,000 160,000* 8,200 0 400,000 0 0
Cooper, 2003 160,000 0 0 0 603,289 0 0
Chairman 2002 160,000 50,000 0 0 375,000 0 0
CEO (until
May 2003)
Karl F. 2004 180,000 80,000* 16,800 0 300,000 0 0
Arleth CEO 2003 85,000 0 0 0 410,338 0 0
*Bonus paid for 2003 performance.
Stock Options
Options/SARs Grants During Last Fiscal Year
The following table provides information related to options granted to our named
executive officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.
Number of % of Total
Securities Options Grant
Underlying Granted Exercise Date
Options in Fiscal Price Per Expiration Present
Name Granted 2004(1) Share Date Value(2)
- -------------- ---------- ----------- --------- ---------- ----------
Howard Cooper 400,000 28.3% $3.60 03/30/14 $ 992,000
Karl F. Arleth 300,000 21.2% $3.60 03/30/14 $ 744,000
(1) The exercise price of the stock options was based on the fair market value
of the stock on the day of the grant.
(2) Valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following
assumptions: volatility of 55%, a risk-free rate of 4.06%, zero dividend
payments, and an expected life of ten years.
The Board issued the options in 2004 with the understanding that they would seek
shareholder approval as to the ultimate number of options that can be issued.
Accordingly, 994,000 of the options representing approximately $2,500,000 of the
fair value of the total options granted could be voided if the shareholders do
not approve an increase in the number of authorized shares available for
issuance under the 2003 Employee Stock option plan.
Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year-End Option Value
Number of
Shares Securities Value of
Acquired Underlying Unexercised
On Value Unexercised In-the-money
Name Exercise Realized Options Options
---- -------- -------- ----------- ------------
Howard Cooper -- -- 1,003,289 --
Karl F. Arleth -- -- 710,338 --
Employee Pension, Profit Sharing or Other Retirement Plans
The Company does not have a defined benefit, pension plan, profit sharing, or
other retirement plan.
Compensation of Directors
The Company pays its outside Directors an annual retainer of $24,000, payable
quarterly. In addition, at the Company's sole discretion, the Company may issue
stock options or warrants to its directors. During 2004, the Company granted to
its outside directors a total of 350,000 options, with an exercise price of
$3.60 and an expiration date of March 30, 2014.
Employment Contracts
Mr. Howard Cooper, Director, signed a consulting agreement with the Company
dated March 1, 2005. The consulting agreement is for an initial term of one year
and will continue for additional one year terms unless 60 days prior to the
anniversary date either party gives notice of termination. Mr. Cooper will
receive bi-monthly payments of $8,333 each. Under the terms of the agreement, if
Mr. Cooper is terminated without cause, he is entitled to 12 months of severance
pay, payable in bi-monthly installments over 12 months, from the date of
termination. The Company may discontinue the severance payments if Mr. Cooper
violates the confidentiality, noncompetition, or nonsolicitation provisions of
his employment agreement.
Mr. Arleth, President and Chief Executive Officer, signed an employment
agreement on May 1, 2003. The agreement is for a three-year term, with an
initial salary of $10,000 per month that was increased to $15,000 per month
beginning in January 2004. Under the terms of the agreement, Mr. Arleth is
entitled to 24 months severance pay in the event of a change of position or
control of the Company.
Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.
The following tables sets forth, as of March 10, 2005, the number of and percent
of our common stock beneficially owned by (a) all directors and nominees, naming
them, (b) the named executive officers, (c) our directors and executive officers
as a group, without naming them, and (d) persons or groups known by us to own
beneficially 5% or more of our common stock:
Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial Percent of
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner Ownership Class
H. Howard Cooper 1,607,481 (1) 14.35%
1600 Broadway, Suite 2400
Denver, Colorado 80202-4921
Karl F. Arleth
1600 Broadway, Suite 2400 908,412 (2) 8.59%
Denver, Colorado 80202-4921
James J. Woodcock 774,684 (3) 7.44%
2404 Commerce Drive
Midland, TX 79702
John T. Connor, Jr. 536,896 (4) 5.32%
1600 Broadway, Suite 2400
Denver, Colorado 80202-4921
Thomas F. Conroy 160,751 (5) 1.63%
3825 S. Colorado Blvd.
Denver, CO 80110
All executive officers and
Directors as a group (7 persons) 3,988,224 30.26%
(1) Includes (i) 145,857 shares of common stock, (ii) 458,335 shares underlying
warrants, with exercise prices ranging from $3.24 to $12.00, (iii) 603,289
shares underlying options exercisable at $3.48 per share and (iv) 400,000 shares
underlying options exercisable at $3.60 per share.
(2) Includes (i) 75,850 shares of common stock, (ii) 122,224 shares underlying
warrants, with exercise prices ranging from $3.24 to $6.00 per share, (iii)
410,338 shares underlying options exercisable at $3.48 per share and (iv)
300,000 shares underlying options exercisable at $3.60 per share.
(3) Includes (i) 105,279 shares of common stock, (ii) 259,257 shares underlying
warrants, with exercise prices ranging from $3.24 to $6.00 per share, (iii)
210,148 shares underlying options exercisable at $3.48 per share and (iv)
200,000 shares underlying options exercisable at $3.60 per share.
(4) Includes (i) 183,554 shares of common stock owned indirectly, (ii) 11,675
shares of common stock owned directly, (iii) 166,667 shares of common stock
underlying warrants, exercisable at $6.00 per share, which are owned indirectly,
(iv)100,000 shares of common stock underlying options exercisable at $3.71 per
share and (v) 75,000 shares of common stock underlying options exercisable at
$3.60 per share.
(5) Includes (i) 27,647 shares of common stock, (ii) 29,446 shares underlying
warrants, with exercise prices ranging from $3.24 to $6.00, (iii) 28,658 shares
underlying options exercisable at $3.48 per share and (iv) 75,000 shares
underlying options exercisable at $3.60 per share.
Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.
Transactions Involving Mr. Howard Cooper
- -----------------------------------------
Mr. Cooper and Teton have entered into a consulting agreement. Mr. Cooper's
consulting agreement with Teton is discussed at "EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION -
Employment Contracts."
Transactions Involving Mr. Arleth
- ---------------------------------
Mr. Arleth, President and Chief Executive Officer, signed an employment
agreement on May 1, 2003. The agreement is for a three-year term, with an
initial salary of $10,000 per month that was increased to $15,000 per month
beginning in January 2004. Under the terms of the agreement, Mr. Arleth is
entitled to 24 months severance pay in the event of a change of position or
control of the Company.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
Audit and Non-Audit Fees
Aggregate fees for professional services rendered for the Company by Ehrhardt
Keefe Steiner & Hottman P.C. as of or for the two fiscal years ended December
31, 2004 and 2003 are set forth below:
Fiscal Year Fiscal Year
2004 2003
------------------------
Audit Fees $ 74,053 $ 141,917
Audit-Related Fees 40,508 51,047
Tax Fees 8,550 6,500
Total $ 123,111 $ 199,464
Audit Fees - Aggregate fees for professional services rendered by Ehrhardt Keefe
Steiner & Hottman PC in connection with its audit of our consolidated financial
statements for the fiscal years 2004 and 2003 and the quarterly reviews of our
financial statements included in Forms 10-Q.
Audit-Related Fees - These were primarily related to SB-2 and SB-2/A filings for
the registration of our stock, assistance with the AMEX application process,
review of the proxy statement and Form 8-K, and reviews and discussions
regarding accounting treatment of debt and equity transactions.
Tax Fees - These were related to tax compliance and related tax services.
Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman P.C. rendered no professional services to us in
connection with the design and implementation of financial information systems
in fiscal year 2004 or 2003.
Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit
Services of Independent Auditors
The Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and non-audit services provided by
the independent auditors prior to the engagement of the independent auditors
with respect to such services. The Chairman of the Audit Committee has been
delegated the authority by the Committee to pre-approve interim services by the
independent auditors other than the annual exam. The Chairman must report all
such pre-approvals to the entire Audit Committee at the next committee meeting.
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
Exhibits.
Exhibit No. Description
- ----------- -----------
3.1.1 Certificate of Incorporation of EQ Resources Ltd incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.1.1 of Teton's Form 10-SB, filed July 3, 2001.
3.1.2 Certificate of Domestication of EQ Resources Ltd incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.1.2 of Teton's Form 10-SB, filed July 3, 2001.
3.1.3 Articles of Merger of EQ Resources Ltd. and American-Tyumen Exploration
Company incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1.3 of Teton's Form 10-SB,
filed July 3, 2001.
3.1.4 Certificate of Amendment of Teton Petroleum Company incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.1.4 of Teton's Form 10-SB, filed July 3, 2001.
3.1.5 Certificate of Amendment of Teton Petroleum Company incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.1.5 of Teton's Form 10-SB, filed July 3, 2001.
3.1.6 Certificate of Designation for Series A Convertible Preferred Stock,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1.6 to Teton's Form SB-2, filed
January 27, 2004.
3.2 Bylaws, as amended, of Teton Petroleum Company incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.2 of our Form 10-QSB, filed August 20, 2002.
10.1 Consulting Agreement dated March 1, 2005, between Teton Petroleum Company
and H. Howard Cooper, filed herewith.
10.1.1 Employment Agreement, dated May 1, 2002, between Teton Petroleum Company
and H. Howard Cooper, filed herewith.
10.3 Employment Agreement, dated May 1, 2003, between Teton Petroleum Company
and Karl F. Arleth, filed herewith.
10.4 2003 Employee Stock Option Plan, filed herewith.
10.5 2004 Non-employee Stock Compensation Plan incorporated by reference to
Appendix B to our Proxy Statement filed on June 14, 2004.
10.6 Binding Letter of Intent dated December 17, 2004 filed herewith.
14.1 Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, filed herewith
21.1 List of Subsidiaries, filed herewith.
31.1 Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Sarbanes -Oxley
Section 302, filed herewith.
31.2 Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Sarbanes -Oxley
Section 302, filed herewith.
32.1 Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350,
filed herewith.
32.2 Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section
1350, filed herewith.
99. 1 Audit Committee Charter incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4 of our
Form 10-KSB/A filed on April 21, 2004.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
TETON PETROLEUM COMPANY
By: /s/ Karl F. Arleth
------------------
Karl. F. Arleth, Chief Executive Officer
Dated: March 24, 2005
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report
has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature Title Date
/s/ James J. Woodcock Chairman and Director March 29, 2005
- ---------------------
James J. Woodcock
/s/ Karl F. Arleth President and CEO March 29, 2005
- ------------------ (principal executive officer)
Karl F. Arleth
/s/ H. Howard Cooper Director March 29, 2005
- --------------------
H. Howard Cooper
/s/ Thomas F. Conroy Director March 29, 2005
- --------------------
Thomas F. Conroy
/s/ John Connor Director March 29, 2005
- ---------------
John Connor
/s/ Patrick A. Quinn Chief Financial Officer March 29, 2005
- -------------------- (principal financial officer)
Patrick A. Quinn