================================================================================
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
[X]
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
[_]
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Transition period from ____________ to ____________
Commission File No. 000-29239
-----------------
INFORTE CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
-----------------
Delaware
(State or other
jurisdiction 36-3909334
of incorporation or (I.R.S. Employer
organization) Identification Number)
150 North Michigan Avenue,
Suite 3400, Chicago, Illinois 60601
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (312) 540-0900
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $.001 par value
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [_]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference on Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to
this Form 10-K. [_]
On March 4, 2002, 11,618,410 shares of the Registrant's common stock were
outstanding. The aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates
of the Registrant was approximately $60,000,000.
Certain portions of the Registrant's definitive proxy statement dated March 22,
2002 for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held April 25, 2002 are
incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.
================================================================================
Inforte Corp.
Form 10-K
December 31, 2001
Table of Contents
Item Page No.
- ---- --------
Part I
1. Business............................................................................. 1
2. Properties........................................................................... 12
3. Legal Proceedings.................................................................... 12
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.................................. 12
4A. Executive Officers of the Registrant................................................. 13
Part II
5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters................ 14
6. Selected Consolidated Financial Data................................................. 15
7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 17
7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk........................... 27
8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data............................. 28
9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure. 46
Part III
10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant................................... 46
11. Executive Compensation............................................................... 46
12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management....................... 46
13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions....................................... 46
Part IV
14. Exhibits, Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K......... 47
SIGNATURES........................................................................... 48
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
The information in this document contains forward-looking statements within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section
21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such statements are
based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties. Any
statements contained in this document that are not of historical fact, are
intended to be, and are, ''forward-looking statements,'' which involve known
and unknown risks. We generally use the following terms and similar expressions
to identify forward-looking statements: ''anticipate,'' ''believe,''
''estimate,'' ''expect,'' ''intend,'' ''may,'' ''plan,'' ''potential,''
''should,'' ''could'' and ''will.'' Our actual results could differ from those
indicated by the forward-looking statements made in this report. Accordingly,
you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking
statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of
activity, or performance. Additionally, we do not assume responsibility for the
accuracy or completeness of these statements. We are under no duty to update
any of the forward-looking statements in this document to conform these
statements to actual results or to changes in our expectations.
Overview
Strategic technology consultancy Inforte Corp. helps clients create strategies
and implement technologies that capture, manage and integrate customer and
other demand information into all aspects of the value chain, enabling
companies to become more demand driven and demand responsive. We assist our
clients in navigating through and succeeding in ever-changing economic
environments by putting into action business and technology strategies that
lower cost and drive revenue.
Our client base consists primarily of Global 2000 companies. Representative
clients in the past year included Ariba, BNP Paribas, Carlson Companies,
ConAgra Foods, CUNA Mutual, Elan Pharmaceuticals, Erickson Retirement
Communities, Experian, LexisNexis, Maytag, Meriwest Credit Union, MTV Networks
Europe, Prudential, PSS/World Medical, RAC Motoring Services, Siebel Systems
and Sprint.
Our proprietary approach to planning and delivering projects, Velocity to Value
(V2V), has produced industry leading project efficiency metrics to help ensure
we deliver projects on time and within budget. We believe our client advocacy
approach and our rigorous delivery methodologies have helped us to achieve high
levels of client satisfaction.
Inforte has grown rapidly since its inception in September 1993, with all of
our growth through organic means rather than through mergers or acquisitions.
Historically, we have funded our growth primarily through internally generated
cash flow from operations and we have continued to generate positive cash flow
since becoming a public company in February, 2000. As of December 31, 2001, we
employed 294 people in our offices in Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas, London, Los
Angeles, New York and San Francisco. Reflecting the importance we place on
employee motivation and ownership, each of our employees is a stock or option
holder.
Industry Background
A fluctuating economic environment has created many challenges for companies
seeking growth, optimal profitability and increased efficiencies in highly
competitive and rapidly changing markets. In order to achieve these goals in
any economic environment, companies need to integrate, manage and better
respond to customer demand. Demand chain management (DCM) solutions apply
well-established forecasting techniques, allowing companies to trust the
results, communicate them consistently and design an organization that
systematically responds to demand.
The analysis, design and implementation of an effective DCM solution require
special skills and expertise that many companies do not possess. These special
skills include the ability to:
. Identify the vital planning information that companies need to better
manage by demand
. Integrate planning processes and systems across business functions
. Develop integrated, demand-driven approaches to planning and executing
operations
. Implement the technology required to support these solutions
The availability of high quality professionals experienced in creating,
implementing and integrating demand chain management solutions is limited. It
is often inefficient and difficult for companies seeking to implement their own
demand solutions to hire, train and retain in-house personnel. As a result,
businesses engage professional services firms to help them design and implement
these strategies and solutions.
The Inforte Solution
Inforte offers demand chain management (DCM) solutions to help clients manage
their businesses profitably by effectively identifying and reacting to changes
in customer and market demand. To most effectively address the needs of our
customers and the market environments of their businesses, we organize our
solutions along vertical industries. Key elements of our solution include:
Demand Chain Management Integration. Inforte develops fast, useable strategies
and provides the software tools needed to help companies be more agile and
effective in responding to changes in market demand. Success in forecasting
customer demand--and in responding proactively to that forecast--fosters
customer acquisition and retention, helps develop partner and vendor
relationships and improves sales, profitability and competitive advantage.
Demand chain management integration includes:
. Strategy--developing an enterprise-level strategy that takes advantage of
the latest technology to support demand-driven management;
. Customer relationship management--transforming the once disconnected
enterprise into an integrated experience, allowing customers to interact
through multiple channels--via phone, fax, e-mail, wireless device, online
live chat, or in person--while still enjoying a consistent, personalized
experience;
. Content management--developing integrated online solutions that solve real
business problems, deliver measurable return on investment and provide
true differentiation and competitive advantage;
. Supply chain management--implementing supply chain management solutions
such as demand planning and forecasting, customer order management,
material and capacity planning, procurement and sourcing.
Advanced Technological Skills. Inforte identifies and uses the latest
technology to design and build DCM solutions for clients to interact with
customers and suppliers and to process business transactions effectively. Our
mission is to deliver technology solutions which have strategic and operational
benefits for our clients within a fixed price and fixed timeframe, and to
transfer to our clients the best practices and skills that enable repeatable
processes to continue after our engagement has ended.
Inforte delivers demand chain management solutions in close collaboration with
several leading software companies, including Ariba, i2 Technologies, Siebel
Systems and Vignette. These and other software providers partner with us to
impact the critical areas of a company's business--from enhancing customer
relationships to better managing the supply chain--helping them become more
demand driven and customer focused. Many of these software vendors are also
Inforte customers, engaging us to deploy solutions in their internal
environments and to develop solutions that integrate their products with
products of other software vendors.
2
To continuously maintain the high level of advanced technological skills among
our staff, Inforte identifies, captures, organizes and disseminates our
knowledge capital internally through an intranet-based system we call the
Inforte Collaborative Environment, or ICE.
Collaborative Client Involvement. We believe our solutions are successful
because they are developed in collaboration with our clients. Because the
ultimate success of any project will depend upon the client's ability to
effectively operate and support the related systems and technology on an
ongoing basis, our co-management approach is designed to include substantial
client participation in all phases of the project. This enables the client to
have a thorough understanding of what has been done, how it was completed and
why it was performed. The collaborative environment is further supported by
allowing clients to access project deliverables through our ICE intranet. We
believe our co-management philosophy differs from that of many service
providers, who limit the client's role in project delivery. We believe our
collaborative knowledge transfer philosophy has contributed to consistently
high project success rates and client satisfaction.
Inforte Strategy
Inforte's strategy is to continue to help clients identify the vital planning
information they need, then implement integrated planning processes and systems
across business functions. The result becomes an integrated, demand driven
approach to planning and executing operations. We provide the strategic
thinking, technology enablement, systems integration and user experience that
makes this possible and effective for clients around the world.
We intend to expand our relationships with existing clients and to develop
relationships with additional Global 2000 companies and emerging enterprises.
The following are the key elements of our strategy:
Maintain Demand Chain Management Solutions Focus. Inforte focuses on providing
clients with demand chain management solutions that help companies become more
demand responsive and demand driven, ultimately enabling them to increase
profitability, lower costs and enhance their competitive positions. As
technology constantly evolves, we update our offerings continually for clients
by combining the latest technology with innovative business models. We will
continue to seek to identify early technology trends and work closely with the
providers of leading-edge technologies so that we offer our clients advanced
technology solutions that enhance their ability to manage by demand. In turn,
we expect this to enhance our ability to generate assignments from existing and
new clients, achieve high margins, maintain our position of technological
leadership and provide challenging assignments to our employees.
Ensure Continued Client Satisfaction. Inforte strives to ensure high client
satisfaction. We survey clients each quarter to assess their satisfaction and
link management compensation to these results. Our quarterly surveys ask
clients open-ended questions on measurements they consider important and ask
them to numerically score us on these factors. For comparability purposes, our
client surveys also request numerical scores on nine set factors, including
expertise, project management skills, business understanding, price and
responsiveness.
Continue to Attract and Retain High Quality Personnel. Inforte's demand chain
management focus requires that we retain highly motivated, intelligent people
of exceptional quality. We believe the best way to continue to attract and
retain highly qualified personnel is to provide an intellectually challenging
environment, compensation equal to or better than our competitors and a strong
corporate culture.
Continue Superior External and Internal Business Execution. We believe the most
critical factor for successful operations and growth of a strategic technology
consulting business is delivering high quality services consistently on time
and within budget. Inforte emphasizes continuous improvement of our delivery
expertise, including our V2V methodology, knowledge management and other
internal processes to compete effectively in the future. We continue to refine
the systems and processes that comprise our internal infrastructure, which we
consider to be advanced for a company of our size.
3
Inforte Services
Inforte works with clients to determine how they can best design and implement
demand chain management solutions to effectively navigate ever-changing
economic environments, lower costs and drive revenues.
Inforte's organization by industry segment helps clients successfully manage
and lead their businesses by delivering dynamic, demand-driven strategy and
technology systems, which address the specific issues of a particular industry.
Inforte's industry expertise includes automotive, business services, chemicals
and energy, communication services, consumer goods, financial services,
healthcare, industrial goods, life sciences, media and entertainment, retail,
technology, transportation and distribution and energy services.
Additionally, Inforte offers solution expertise that addresses the functions
necessary to help clients succeed by delivering the strategic thinking,
technology enablement, systems integration and user experience that makes
demand-driven decision-making possible and effective for clients around the
world.
Solutions include strategy, customer relationship management, content
management and supply chain management.
Strategy. Inforte offers several rapid strategy engagements designed to assess
the business need and value of a DCM process or technology. Inforte's
proprietary Business Value Assessments (BVA) are workshop and interview-driven
approaches that determine:
. What quantitative, measurable benefits a firm can receive through better
technology initiatives
. How those benefits relate to top business issues
. What is the lowest risk way to capture those benefits
Completed in just a few weeks, our strategic BVAs identify opportunities for
improving demand management and help our clients close the gap between how a
firm perceives its customers' needs and the reality of what its customers want.
Customer relationship management. Inforte helps companies move beyond initial
sales force automation or call center CRM systems to develop integrated,
customer-facing solutions. These solutions extend core sales and service
capabilities to enhance customer loyalty and profitability, deliver measurable
return on investment and provide true differentiation and competitive advantage.
Our CRM practice helps companies:
. Refine their CRM strategy to align overall corporate strategy with
industry best practices
. Develop programs for identifying, acquiring, servicing and retaining
profitable customers
. Deploy best-of-breed technology solutions that support the CRM vision
. Ensure consistent, personalized and intelligent customer interactions
across channels to optimize customer value and maximize revenue
. Achieve measurable cost savings through effective implementation of CRM
solutions that address strategy, process and technology
. Increase profitability via loyalty programs that maximize customer
lifetime values
. Gain a competitive advantage by delivering targeted sales programs and
superior service to customers
Content Management. Inforte is committed to helping companies move beyond
simple content management to developing integrated online solutions that solve
real business problems, deliver measurable return on investment and provide
true differentiation and competitive advantage. Our Content Management practice
helps companies:
. Drive revenue growth through a holistic approach to building customer
relationships and personalized, "one-to-one" online marketing
4
. Ensure consistent, personalized and intelligent customer interactions
across every channel by optimizing channel value and maximizing revenue
potential
. Achieve measurable cost savings through effective management of online
properties, such as internet, intranet or extranet solutions
. Develop effective portal strategies for improving customer, partner and
employee relationships and effectiveness with timely and accurate delivery
of online content
. Examine existing technologies and strategies to determine the real
benefits of integration with content management applications
Supply Chain Management. Supply chain management (SCM) planning and forecasting
solutions are critical components to building and executing an effective DCM
strategy. Our focus on providing comprehensive SCM solutions helps companies:
. Increase visibility to constantly changing demand signals
. Increase revenue opportunities with a better product mix
. Reduce inventory and freight expenses
. Minimize overtime expenses and material shortages
. Reduce "maverick" buying, rationalize suppliers and compress order cycle
time
. Realize significant return on investment from time and cost savings
All Inforte projects are governed by our V2V project delivery methodology. We
structure and price our projects in shorter, multiple phases to ensure that
each phase meets the client's business objectives.
Clients
During 2001 our top five clients equaled 36 percent of total revenue and our
top ten clients equaled 54 percent of total revenue. No single customer
provided Inforte with over 10 percent of total 2001 revenue.
Sales and Marketing
Inforte markets with a team-selling approach that combines dedicated sales
professionals, senior delivery executives and specific solutions leads. We
believe our team model is superior to a traditional professional services sales
model where one individual must manage the sales process in addition to
providing the services. Our dedicated sales professionals focus primarily on
selling to new customers, while our delivery and solutions leads focus primary
on maintaining and extending relationships with existing customers.
We use a proprietary sales and marketing methodology called SAMM to capture
detailed information on sales opportunities. SAMM is based on a heavily
customized customer relationship management system to track potential contracts
at each of the 11 stages of our sales cycle. We project revenue based on a
probability analysis of each sales opportunity, allowing us to manage
continually our staffing needs and spending plans.
Our market development efforts are designed to build Inforte's brand name and
recognition in the marketplace and generate leads for new business. Our
activities include strategic direct marketing programs, seminars and briefings
that target corporate executives, public speaking opportunities, attendance at
industry conferences, regular meetings with industry analysts, public relations
programs, electronic brochures and use of web site properties such as
inforte.com.
We complement our internal sales and marketing processes with select formalized
industry alliances. We receive leads from a number of well-known software
vendors with whom we have strategic, non-exclusive marketing relationships,
including Ariba, i2 Technologies, Siebel Systems and Vignette, among others. We
search
5
continually for leading software vendors with whom we can share business leads,
and expect to add new relationships from time to time, as well as work with
other software vendors with whom we do not have formalized relationships.
People & Culture
Our headcount was 122 people at the end of 1998, 257 people at the end of 1999,
442 people at the end of 2000 and 294 employees as of December 31, 2001. Of
these, 217 are consultants, 26 are in sales and marketing, including 19
quota-based sales personnel, 9 are in human resources and 42 are management or
administrative personnel. None of our employees is represented by a labor
union, and we believe our employee relations are excellent.
We consider our culture to be rewarding and fun and think it is a key reason we
are able to attract and retain high quality employees. We have sophisticated
recruiting, retention and career development processes that have resulted in
ratios for internal employee referrals, offers-to-acceptances and voluntary
turnover that we believe are among the best in the industry. All employees
receive stock options when they join Inforte, as we believe that equity
ownership is an important component of employee motivation and compensation.
Competition
We compete in the information technology professional services market, which is
highly competitive. Despite the elimination of many players over the past year,
competition has intensified due to reduced spending on information technology
in a tough economic environment. We expect this to continue. We believe that
our competitors fall into several categories, including the following:
. The past and current consulting arms of global accounting firms, to
include Accenture, Andersen, Cap Gemini Ernst & Young, Deloitte
Consulting, KPMG Consulting and PwC Consulting
. Technology consulting firms such as Answerthink, Braun Consulting, and
Sapient
. Large systems integration or outsourcing firms such as Computer Sciences
Corp., EDS and IBM Global Services
. Strategy consulting firms such as Bain, Booz-Allen & Hamilton, Boston
Consulting Group, DiamondCluster and McKinsey
. Professional services divisions of software application vendors
. Internal information technology departments of current and potential
clients.
Many of our competitors have longer operating histories, larger client bases,
longer relationships with clients, greater brand or name recognition and
significantly greater financial, technical, marketing and public relations
resources than we do.
However, we believe that only a few of our competitors possess all of the
skills necessary to offer the comprehensive demand chain management strategies
and solutions that we provide.
We believe that the principal competitive factors in the information technology
professional services market are a model that integrates demand levers into the
value chain, a proven record of project delivery and high customer
satisfaction. We believe that our service offerings allow us to compete
favorably in all of the above areas.
There are relatively low barriers to entry into the information technology
professional services market. Existing or future competitors may develop or
offer services that are comparable or superior to ours at a lower price, which
could cause our revenues to decline.
Risk Factors
In addition to other information in this Form 10-K, the following risk factors
should be carefully considered in evaluating Inforte and its business because
such factors currently may have a significant impact on Inforte's business,
operating results and financial condition. As a result of the risk factors set
forth below and elsewhere in this Form 10-K, and the risk factors discussed in
Inforte's other Securities and Exchange Commission filings, actual results
could differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements.
6
RISKS RELATED TO INFORTE
If we are unable to accurately forecast our quarterly revenue our profitability
may be reduced or eliminated.
The level of spending by clients and potential clients on information
technology in the United States has slowed and become less certain. We believe
the uncertainty stems from the rapid slowing of growth in Gross Domestic
Product in the United States that began in the second half of calendar 2000. In
some cases the uncertainty has reduced the overall number and size of projects
available for bid. In other cases the uncertainty has resulted in project
deferrals, project scope reductions or limited follow-on projects at existing
clients. While our revenue forecast methods are sophisticated and have proven
accurate historically, we believe the recent environment adds greater risk and
uncertainty to our forecasts. If we fail to accurately forecast revenue, our
actual results may differ materially from the amounts planned, and our
profitability may be reduced or eliminated.
If we fail to identify and successfully transition to the latest and most
demanded solutions or keep up with an evolving industry, we will not compete
successfully for clients and our profits may decrease.
We focus on providing our clients solutions that employ the latest
technologies. If we fail to identify the latest solutions, or if we identify
but fail to successfully transition our business to solutions with growing
demand, our reputation and our ability to compete for clients and the best
employees could suffer. If we cannot compete successfully for clients, our
revenues may decrease. Also, if our projects do not involve the latest and most
demanded solutions, they would generate lower fees.
Because our market changes constantly, some of the most important challenges
facing us are the need to:
. effectively use the latest technologies;
. continue to develop our strategic and technical expertise;
. influence and respond to emerging industry standards and other
technological changes;
. identify and effectively market solutions with growing demand during a
period of slower technological advancement and adoption;
. enhance our current services; and
. develop new services that meet changing customer needs.
All of these challenges must be met in a timely and cost-effective manner. We
cannot assure you that we will succeed in effectively meeting these challenges,
especially during a substantial economic slowdown or a recession when right
sizing the business for lower demand diverts resources and senior management's
attention.
If we fail to satisfy our clients' expectations, our existing and continuing
business could be adversely affected.
If we fail to satisfy the expectations of our clients, we could damage our
reputation and our ability to retain existing clients and attract new clients.
In addition, if we fail to perform our engagements, we could be liable to our
clients for breach of contract. Although most of our contracts limit the amount
of any damages to the fees we received, we could still incur substantial cost,
negative publicity, and diversion of management resources to defend a claim,
and as a result, our business results could suffer.
We may be unable to hire and retain employees who are highly skilled, which
would impair our ability to perform client services, generate revenue and
achieve profitability.
If we are unable to hire and retain highly-skilled individuals, our ability to
retain existing business and compete for new business will be harmed.
Individuals who have the experience and expertise to market, sell and perform
the services we provide to our clients are limited and competition for these
individuals is intense. To attract and retain these individuals, we invest a
significant amount of time and money. In addition, we expect that both
7
bonus payments and equity ownership will be an important component of overall
employee compensation. In the current economic and market environment, overall
bonus payments have been reduced significantly, increasing the risk that key
employees will leave Inforte. Also, if our stock price does not increase over
time, it may be more difficult to retain employees who have been compensated
with stock options. Options granted to employees from the IPO date, February
17, 2000, through December 31, 2001 have exercise prices of $8.56 to $71.81.
The average exercise price of all options outstanding at December 31, 2001 is
$15.80. Since the current market price for Inforte stock has recently been
below this average strike price, it may be more difficult to retain employees.
If key employee retention rates grow to unacceptable levels because
compensation is not at competitive rates, Inforte may increase the level of
stock option grants or cash compensation. These actions would reduce earnings
per share and may cause Inforte to become unprofitable.
If we fail to adequately manage rapid changes in demand, our profitability and
cash flow may be reduced or eliminated.
If we cannot keep pace with the rapid changes in demand, we will be unable to
effectively match resources with demand, and maintain high client satisfaction,
which may eliminate our profitability and our ability to achieve positive cash
flow from operations. Our business grew dramatically from 1993 through 2000.
For example, our revenue increased from $13.4 million in 1998, to $30.1 million
in 1999 and to $63.8 million in 2000. As a result of the current U.S. economic
environment and overcapacity in our industry however, revenue in 2001 was
$47.7 million, a 25% decline compared to 2000. For 2002, industry demand is
highly dependent on the macroeconomic environment, which heavily influences our
clients' level of information technology services spending and competition
among service providers. The level of information technology spending is
subject to rapid positive and negative changes. If the level of spending
declines further, we may not be profitable or achieve positive cash flow from
operations in 2002. Currently, we expect revenue to decline to $8.5 million per
quarter or to $34.0 million in 2002. If, on the other hand, our growth exceeds
our expectations, our current resources and infrastructure may be inadequate to
handle the growth. Also, our senior management team has limited collective
experience managing a public company or a business the current size of Inforte
and our management team has limited collective experience managing a business
during an economic slowdown or recession.
If our marketing relationships with software vendors deteriorate, we would lose
their client referrals.
We currently have marketing relationships with software vendors, including
Ariba, i2, Siebel and Vignette. Although we have historically received a large
number of business leads from these software vendors to implement their
products, they are not required to refer business to us and they may terminate
these relationships at any time. If our relationships with these software
vendors deteriorate, we may lose their client leads and our ability to develop
new clients could be negatively impacted. Any decrease in our ability to obtain
clients may cause a reduction in our revenues.
If we are unable to rapidly integrate third-party software, we may not be able
to deliver solutions to our clients on a timely basis, resulting in lost
revenues and potential liability.
In providing client services, we recommend that our clients use software
applications from a variety of third-party vendors. If we are unable to
implement and integrate this software in a fully functional manner for our
clients, we may experience difficulties that could delay or prevent the
successful development, introduction or marketing of services. Software often
contains errors or defects, particularly when first introduced or when new
versions or enhancements are released. Despite internal testing and testing by
current and potential clients, our current and future solutions may contain
serious defects due to third-party software or software we develop or customize
for clients. Serious defects or errors could result in liability for damages,
lost revenues or a delay in implementation of our solutions.
Our revenues could be negatively affected by the loss of a large client or our
failure to collect a large account receivable.
At times, we derive a significant portion of our revenue from large projects
for a limited number of varying clients. In the December 2001 quarter, our five
largest clients accounted for 43% of revenue and our ten largest
8
clients accounted for 63% of revenue. In 2001, our five largest clients
accounted for 36% of revenue and our ten largest clients accounted for 54% of
revenue. In 2000, our five largest clients accounted for 31% of revenue and our
ten largest clients accounted for 46% of revenue. Although these large clients
vary from time to time and our long-term revenues do not rely on any one
client, our revenues could be negatively affected if we were to lose one of
these clients or if we were to fail to collect a large account receivable.
In addition, many of our contracts are short-term and provide that our clients
can reduce or cancel our services without incurring any penalty. If our clients
reduce or terminate our services, we would lose revenue and would have to
reallocate our employees and our resources to other projects to attempt to
minimize the effects of that reduction or termination. Accordingly,
terminations, including any termination by a major client, could adversely
impact our revenues. During 2002 we believe the uncertain economic environment
increases the probability that services may be reduced or canceled.
If we estimate incorrectly the time required to complete our projects, we will
lose money on fixed-price contracts.
A majority of our contracts are fixed-price contracts, rather than contracts in
which the client pays us on a time and materials basis. We must estimate the
number of hours and the materials required before entering into a fixed-price
contract. Our future success will depend on our ability to continue to set
rates and fees accurately and to maintain targeted rates of employee
utilization and project quality. If we fail to accurately estimate the time and
the resources required for a project, any required increase in the time and
resources to complete the project could cause our profits to decline.
Fluctuations in our quarterly revenues and operating results due to cyclical
client demand may lead to reduced prices for our stock.
Our quarterly revenues and operating results have fluctuated significantly in
the past and we expect them to continue to fluctuate significantly in the
future. Historically, we have experienced our greatest sequential growth during
the first and second quarters. We typically experience significantly lower
sequential growth in the third and fourth quarters. We attribute this to the
budgeting cycles of our customers, most of whom have calendar-based fiscal
years and as a result are more likely to incur the expense of our services
during the first half of the year. During 2002, we do not expect this normal
seasonal growth pattern, and have adjusted our headcount, recruiting and
spending plans accordingly. Our cautious expectations for 2002 are based upon
an uncertain economic environment in the United States and Europe. If we are
unable to predict the cyclical client demand in a slower growth or distressed
economic environment, our expenses may be disproportionate to our revenue on a
quarterly basis and our stock price may be adversely affected.
Others could claim that we infringe on their intellectual property rights,
which may result in substantial costs, diversion of resources and management
attention, and harm to our reputation.
A portion of our business involves the development of software applications for
specific client engagements. Although we believe that our services do not
infringe on the intellectual property rights of others, we may be the subject
of claims for infringement, which even if successfully defended could be costly
and time-consuming. An infringement claim against us could materially and
adversely affect us in that we may:
. experience a diversion of our financial resources and management attention;
. incur damages and litigation costs, including attorneys' fees;
. be enjoined from further use of the intellectual property;
. be required to obtain a license to use the intellectual property,
incurring licensing fees;
. need to develop a non-infringing alternative, which could be costly and
delay projects; and
. have to indemnify clients with respect to losses incurred as a result of
our infringement of the intellectual property.
9
Because we are newer and smaller than many of our competitors, we may not have
the resources to effectively compete, causing our revenues to decline.
Many of our competitors have longer operating histories, larger client bases,
longer relationships with clients, greater brand or name recognition, and
significantly greater financial, technical, marketing, and public relations
resources than we do. We may be unable to compete with full-service consulting
companies, including the past and current consulting divisions of the largest
global accounting firms, who are able to offer their clients a wider range of
services. If our clients decide to take their information technology
professional services projects to these companies, our revenues may decline. It
is possible that in uncertain economic times our clients may prefer to work
with larger firms to a greater extent than normal. In addition, new
professional services companies may provide services similar to ours at a lower
price, which could cause our revenues to decline.
Our expansion and growth internationally could negatively affect our business.
In 2001, our international revenues were over 10% of total revenues. In the
December 2001 quarter, international revenue exceeded 15% of total revenue. As
our international revenue grows, we face additional risks that we do not face
domestically. Such risks include longer customer payment cycles, adverse taxes
and compliance with local laws and regulations. Further, the effects of
fluctuations in currency exchange rates may adversely affect the results of
operations. Finally, there are indications that the U.S. economic slowdown is
spreading to the rest of the world, which could limit our ability to obtain
international revenue going forward. These risk factors, as well as others not
cited here, may negatively impact our business.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR INDUSTRY
If the rate of adoption of advanced information technology slows substantially,
our revenues may decrease.
We market our services primarily to firms that want to adopt information
technology that provides an attractive return on investment or helps provides a
sustainable competitive advantage. Our revenues could decrease if companies
decide not to integrate the latest technologies into their businesses due to
economic factors, governmental regulations, financial constraints or other
reasons.
Inforte's market research suggests that the level information technology
spending in the United States is closely linked with the growth rate of the
Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The recent slowdown in the GDP growth rate has
caused a slower rate of adoption of advanced information technology by our
target clients. We expect information technology spending and Inforte revenue
to be highly dependent on the health of the US economy.
We expect that the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001 may have some impact
on our business. Our clients, particularly those in the insurance, financial
services, or software and technology businesses and those based in or near New
York, may discover financial liabilities or experience business delays
resulting from the attacks, or resulting from the impact the attacks may have
on the overall economy or demand in a particular industry.
If the supply of information technology companies and personnel continues to
exceed demand, this may adversely impact the pricing of our projects and our
ability to win business.
Beginning in the second half of 2000 many firms in our industry announced
significant employee layoffs and lower rates of utilization of billable
personnel. An oversupply of technology professionals may reduce the price
clients are willing to pay for our services. An oversupply may also increase
the talent pool for potential clients who may choose to complete projects
in-house rather than use an outside consulting firm such as Inforte. Lower
utilization rates increase the likelihood that a competitor will reduce their
price to secure business in order to improve their utilization rate. The extent
to which pricing and our ability to win business may be impacted is a function
of both the magnitude and duration of the supply and demand imbalance in our
industry.
10
RISKS RELATED TO THE OWNERSHIP OF OUR COMMON STOCK
Our stock price could be extremely volatile, like many technology stocks.
The market prices of securities of technology companies, particularly
information technology services companies, have been highly volatile. We expect
continued high volatility in our stock price, with prices at times bearing no
relationship to Inforte's operating performance.
Inforte's average trading volume during 2001 has averaged approximately 87,000
shares per day. On any particular day, Inforte's trading volume can be less
than 20,000 shares which increase the potential for volatile stock prices.
Volatility of our stock price could result in expensive class action litigation.
If our common stock suffers from volatility like the securities of other
technology companies, we have a greater risk of further securities class action
litigation claims. One such claim is pending presently. Litigation could result
in substantial costs and could divert our resources and senior management's
attention. This could harm our productivity and profitability.
Officers and directors own a significant percentage of outstanding shares and,
as a group, may control a vote of stockholders.
As of December 31, 2001 the executive officers and directors set forth below,
own approximately 45.3% of the outstanding shares of our common stock and own
individually the percentage set forth opposite their names:
. Philip S. Bligh 22.0%
. Stephen C.P. Mack 18.1%
. Nick Padgett 5.2%
If the stockholders listed above act or vote together with other employees who
own significant shares of our common stock they will have the ability to
control the election of our directors and the approval of any other action
requiring the approval of our stockholders, including any amendments to the
certificate of incorporation and mergers or sales of all or substantially all
assets, even if the other stockholders perceive that these actions are not in
their best interests.
Over time, the influence or control executive officers have on a stockholder
vote will decrease as officers supplement below-market salaries and diversify
overall equity wealth with sales of Inforte stock. As permitted by SEC Rule
10b5-1, Inforte executive officers have or may set up a predefined, structured
stock trading program. The trading program allows brokers acting on behalf of
company insiders to trade company stock while the insiders may be aware of
material, non-public information, if the transaction is performed according to
a pre-existing contract, instruction or plan that was established with the
broker when the insider was not aware of any material, non-public information.
The authorization of preferred stock, a staggered board of directors and
supermajority voting requirements will make a takeover attempt more difficult,
even if the takeover would be favorable for stockholders.
Inforte's certificate of incorporation and bylaws may have the effect of
deterring, delaying or preventing a change in control of Inforte. For example,
our charter documents provide for:
. the ability of the board of directors to issue preferred stock and to
determine the price and other terms, including preferences and voting
rights, of those shares without stockholder approval;
. the inability of our stockholders to act by written consent or to call a
special meeting;
. advance notice provisions for stockholder proposals and nominations to the
board of directors;
11
. a staggered board of directors, with three-year terms, which will lengthen
the time needed to gain control of the board of directors; and
. supermajority voting requirements for stockholders to amend provisions of
the charter documents described above.
We are also subject to Delaware law. Section 203 of the Delaware General
Corporation Law prohibits us from engaging in a business combination with any
significant stockholder for a period of three years from the date the person
became a significant stockholder unless, for example, our board of directors
approved the transaction that resulted in the stockholder becoming an
interested stockholder. Any of the above could have the effect of delaying or
preventing changes in control that a stockholder may consider favorable.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Our headquarters are located in Chicago, Illinois. Senior management, sales,
marketing, human resources and administrative personnel, as well as the
Chicago-based consultants use this facility. We have two subleases for a total
of 50,765 square feet in Chicago. The primary sublease for 33,065 square feet
expires in December 2005 with no option to renew. The secondary sublease for
17,700 square feet expires in June 2006 with no option to renew. We have
regional offices for our regional personnel. We lease 22,529 square feet in
Irvine, California and this lease term expires in July 2006 with an option to
renew. We lease 4,480 square feet in Irving, Texas and this lease term expires
in May 2005 with an option to renew. We have also entered into various
short-term leases for professional office space in San Mateo, California,
Jersey City, New Jersey, Alpharetta, Georgia, and London, England.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Inforte Corp. and Philip S. Bligh, Stephen C.P. Mack and Nick Padgett, as
officers of Inforte, have been named as defendants in Brian Padgett v. Inforte
Corp.; Goldman, Sachs & Co.; Salomon Smith Barney, Inc.; Philip S. Bligh;
Stephen C.P. Mack and Nick Padgett, Case No. 01 CV 10836, filed on November 30,
2001 in Federal Court in the Southern District of New York. The complaint
alleges violations of federal securities laws in connection with our initial
public offering (IPO) occurring in February 2000 based on alleged omissions in
our prospectus relating to compensation payable to, and the manner of
distribution of our IPO shares by, our underwriters. The complaint does not
allege any claims relating to any alleged misrepresentations or omissions with
respect to our business. The complaint also does not allege that we or Messrs.
Bligh, Mack and Padgett knew of these alleged omissions. We believe that we and
our officers have meritorious defenses to the claims and we intend to
vigorously defend the lawsuit.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Not applicable.
12
ITEM 4A. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The following table provides information with respect to our executive officers:
Name Age Position
---- --- --------
Philip S. Bligh 34 Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
Stephen C.P. Mack 36 Chief Operating Officer, President and Director
Nick Padgett 35 Chief Financial Officer and Director
Philip S. Bligh co-founded Inforte and has served as chairman of the board of
directors of Inforte since inception in September 1993. Mr. Bligh also
currently serves as chief executive officer. Before founding Inforte, Mr. Bligh
served in various technology consulting roles for Accenture from October 1988
to February 1991 and as a project manager for Systems Software Associates, an
enterprise software provider, from April 1991 through Inforte's founding. Mr.
Bligh holds a B.S. in chemical engineering from University College London,
England.
Stephen C.P. Mack joined Inforte in October 1994 and has served as a director
since that time. Mr. Mack is currently Inforte's chief operating officer and
president. Before joining Inforte, from February 1988 to October 1994, Mr. Mack
worked at Accenture, where he was, most recently, a project manager responsible
for the design and implementation of enterprise-wide operational and decision
support systems for large, multinational corporations. Mr. Mack holds a
Master's degree in engineering and management from the University of
Birmingham, England.
Nick Padgett has served as Inforte's chief financial officer since December
1997. Mr. Padgett has been a director of Inforte since its founding in
September 1993. Before joining Inforte, Mr. Padgett served as an equity
research analyst for William Blair & Company, from August 1994 to December
1997. Before William Blair, Mr. Padgett served in various technology consulting
roles for Accenture from June 1988 to September 1992. Mr. Padgett holds an
M.B.A. from the Amos Tuck School of Business Administration at Dartmouth
College and a B.S. in computer science from Western Illinois University.
Key Employees
We have many other key employees. A partial listing follows:
Executive Vice President
Nick Heyes
Senior Vice President
Richard Ingleton
Vice President
Adrian Ball Jeff Kavanaugh Roger Neale
Robert Beach Terry Kiely Michael Passilla
Daniel Gathof Andrew LaCivita Simon Prowse
Kevin Gothelf Tom Madison Ronald Scheuman
Jeff Hiser Richard Miller Christian Sprinkle
David Karp Carlos Navarro Darius Vaskelis
13
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol
''INFT.'' Our initial public offering of stock was February 17, 2000 at $32.00
per share. The price range reflected in the table below, is the highest and
lowest closing sale price for our stock as reported by the Nasdaq National
Market during each quarter the stock had been publicly traded. Our present
policy is to retain earnings, if any, to finance future growth. We have never
paid cash dividends and have no present intention to pay cash dividends. In
January 2001, Inforte announced that the board of directors approved a stock
repurchase program that allows Inforte to buy up to $25 million of Inforte
shares. The program has no expiration and will be used to make periodic
purchases at Inforte's discretion to offset the dilutive impact from Inforte's
stock option and employee stock purchase programs. As of March 4, 2002, there
were approximately 3,606 stockholders, including stockholders of record and
holders in street name, and the price per share of our common stock was $9.36.
Three Months Ended
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mar. 31, Jun. 30, Sep. 30, Dec. 31, Mar. 31, Jun. 30, Sep. 30, Dec. 31,
2000 2000 2000 2000 2001 2001 2001 2001
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Price range per share:
Low................ $48.00 $22.25 $31.06 $10.81 $ 7.69 $ 7.74 $ 9.26 $ 8.98
High............... $80.44 $51.38 $56.13 $36.75 $23.00 $14.68 $12.80 $14.00
14
ITEM 6. SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with our
consolidated financial statements and related notes and ''Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations''
included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. The consolidated statement of operations
data for the years ended 1999, 2000 and 2001 and the balance sheet data as of
December 31, 2000 and 2001 are derived from our audited consolidated financial
statements, which are included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. The consolidated
statement of operations data for the years ended 1997 and 1998 and the balance
sheet data as of December 31, 1997, 1998, and 1999 are derived from our audited
consolidated financial statements, which are not included in this Form 10-K.
Year ended December 31,
---------------------------------------
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
------ ------- ------- ------- -------
(in thousands, except per share data)
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:
Revenues............................................... $5,056 $13,447 $30,088 $63,839 $47,736
Operating expenses:....................................
Project personnel and related expenses.............. 2,722 6,830 12,846 28,182 26,334
Sales and marketing................................. 829 1,467 4,949 8,584 7,073
Recruiting, retention, and training................. 694 1,165 2,987 6,360 2,869
Management and administrative....................... 951 2,692 5,617 12,831 13,207
Non-cash stock compensation expense (1)............. -- -- -- -- 1,374
------ ------- ------- ------- -------
Total operating expenses............................... 5,196 12,154 26,399 55,957 50,857
------ ------- ------- ------- -------
Operating income (loss)................................ (140) 1,293 3,689 7,882 (3,122)
Interest income (expense), net and other............... (22) 23 147 3,387 3,433
------ ------- ------- ------- -------
Income (loss) before income taxes...................... (162) 1,316 3,836 11,269 311
Income tax expense..................................... -- -- 1,287 4,395 503
------ ------- ------- ------- -------
Net income (loss)...................................... $ (162) $ 1,316 $ 2,549 $ 6,874 $ (192)
====== ======= ======= ======= =======
Earnings per share
Basic............................................... $ 0.57 $ (0.02)
======= =======
Diluted............................................. $ 0.51 $ (0.02)
======= =======
Weighted-average common shares outstanding:
Basic............................................... 12,051 12,472
======= =======
Diluted............................................. 13,501 12,472
======= =======
Pro forma information (unaudited):
Pro forma operating income (loss) (1).................. $ (140) $ 1,293 $ 3,689 $(1,748)
Interest income (expense), net and other............... (22) 23 147 3,433
Pro forma income (loss) before pro forma income taxes.. (162) 1,316 3,836 1,685
Pro forma income tax expense (benefit) (2)............. (51) 539 1,542 503
------ ------- ------- -------
Pro forma net income (loss)............................ $ (111) $ 777 $ 2,294 $ 1,182
====== ======= ======= =======
Pro forma earnings per share (unaudited):
Basic............................................... $(0.02) $ 0.14 $ 0.27 $ 0.09
====== ======= ======= =======
Diluted............................................. $(0.02) $ 0.08 $ 0.21 $ 0.09
====== ======= ======= =======
Pro forma weighted-average common shares outstanding:
Basic............................................... 5,264 5,517 8,636 12,472
====== ======= ======= =======
Diluted............................................. 5,264 10,143 10,786 13,274
====== ======= ======= =======
Balance Sheet Data (at period end):
Cash and short-term and long-term marketable securities $ 66 $ 2,698 $ 3,792 $82,997 $75,117
Working capital........................................ 155 1,006 793 65,318 47,639
Total assets........................................... 1,168 5,581 12,957 99,903 86,459
Long-term debt, net of current portion................. 24 -- -- -- --
Stockholders' equity................................... 250 1,661 2,301 83,044 72,203
(Footnotes on following page)
15
(1) In 2001 Inforte incurred a non-cash, non-recurring stock compensation
expense of $1,374 for a performance-based option, which is recognized as an
expense under GAAP. This option was granted in 1997 with an exercise price
equal to the fair market value at the time of grant and with vesting based
on achieving specified corporate performance criteria. Once vesting is
probable (the "measurement date") GAAP requires recording of an expense
equal to the difference between fair market value on the measurement date
and the exercise price times the number of shares granted under the option.
With typical time-based vesting criteria, the measurement date equals the
grant date and no expense is recorded normally. The performance-based
vesting criteria on this option was more difficult to achieve than the
normal time-based criteria of a typical Inforte option. Thus, Inforte
believes that the application of GAAP to this option grant, which results
in lower GAAP earnings despite vesting criteria more advantageous to
Inforte than typical, is misleading to investors and reduces comparability
of results from different periods. The pro forma information shows results
excluding this non-cash expense. This expense had no impact on income tax
expense. The pro forma diluted earnings per share calculation uses weighted
average common shares outstanding that include dilutive common stock
equivalents. There will be no expense from this option in future years.
(2) During the three years ended December 31, 1998, Inforte operated as a
sub-chapter S corporation under the Internal Revenue Code and in some of
the states in which we did business. As a result, any taxable earnings or
loss flowed through to Inforte stockholders. The pro forma net income
(loss) data assumes that Inforte was subject to income tax had we always
operated as a C corporation. In 1999, Inforte was a C corporation; however,
the conversion from a sub-chapter S corporation to a C corporation resulted
in a tax benefit for accounting purposes due to the recording of deferred
tax benefits, increasing earnings per share. The pro forma earnings per
share for the year ended December 31, 1999 reflects the earnings per share
Inforte would have reported without the one-time conversion to a C
corporation.
16
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion in conjunction with ''Selected
Financial Data'' and our consolidated financial statements, together with the
notes to those statements, included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. The following
discussions contains forward-looking statements that involve risks,
uncertainties, and assumptions such as statements of our plans, objectives,
expectations and intentions. Our actual results may differ materially from
those discussed in these forward-looking statements because of the risks and
uncertainties inherent in future events, particularly those identified in
''Risk Factors.''
OVERVIEW
Strategic technology consultancy Inforte Corp. helps clients create strategies
and implement technologies that capture, manage and integrate customer and
other demand information into all aspects of the value chain, enabling
companies to become more demand driven and demand responsive. We assist our
clients in navigating through and succeeding in ever-changing economic
environments by putting into action business and technology strategies that
lower cost and drive revenue. Inforte's client advocacy approach and rigorous
delivery methodologies have garnered the trust of Global 2000 clients, produced
industry-leading project-efficiency metrics and helped Inforte earn references
from 100 percent of its clients. Founded in 1993, Inforte is headquartered in
Chicago and has offices in Atlanta, Dallas, London, Los Angeles, New York and
San Francisco.
Inforte works with clients to determine how they can best design and implement
demand chain management solutions to effectively capitalize on the latest
information technology. The majority of revenue is from professional services
performed on a fixed-price basis; however, we also perform services on a
time-and-materials basis. Typically, the first portion of an engagement
involves a strategy project or a discovery phase lasting 30 to 60 days, which
we perform on a fixed-price basis. This work enables us to determine with our
clients the scope of successive phases for design and implementation, which in
total generally last three to nine months, and to decide whether we will
perform these additional phases for a fixed price or on a time-and-materials
basis. Whether we use fixed pricing or time-and-material pricing depends upon
our assessment of the project's risk, and how precisely our clients are able to
define the scope of activities they wish us to perform. Fixed prices are based
on estimates from senior personnel in our consulting organization who project
the length of the engagement, the number of people required to complete the
engagement and the skill level and billing rates of those people. We then
adjust the fixed price based on various qualitative risk factors such as the
aggressiveness of the delivery deadline and the technical complexity of the
solution.
We ask clients to pay 25%-50% of our fixed-price projects in advance to enable
us to secure a project team in a timeframe that is responsive to the client's
needs. We bill the remainder in advance of the work performed based upon a
predetermined billing schedule over the course of the engagement. We recognize
revenues from fixed-price contracts on the percentage-of-completion method,
based on the ratio of costs incurred to total estimated costs. Amounts billed
before we perform services are classified as deferred revenue. We bill
time-and-materials projects twice per month on the 15th and last day of each
month. We recognize time-and-materials revenues as we perform the services.
Through 2001, we did not include in our revenues the reimbursable expenses we
charge to our clients, on either fixed-price or time-and-material projects, as
we believe this is the most meaningful presentation of our income statement. In
2002, we will include reimbursable expenses in revenue and expense and we will
reclassify prior periods in the comparative consolidated financial statements
as now required by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. See "Recent
Accounting Pronouncements" for more information.
Our revenues and earnings may fluctuate from quarter to quarter based on
factors within and outside of our control. These include:
. The variability in market demand for strategic technology professional
services and our ability to win business;
. The degree of competitive pricing;
17
. The length of the sales cycle associated with our service offerings;
. The number, size and scope of our projects;
. The efficiency with which we deliver projects and use our people;
. The compensation that we pay our people; and
. Our ability to keep expenses within budget.
If revenues do not increase at a rate at least equal to increases in expenses,
our results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth the percentage of revenues of certain items
included in Inforte's consolidated statement of operations:
Year ended December 31,
---------------------
1999 2000 2001
----- ----- -----
Revenues.................................................. 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Operating expenses:
Project personnel and related expenses................. 42.7 44.1 55.2
Sales and marketing.................................... 16.4 13.4 14.8
Recruiting, retention and training..................... 9.9 10.0 6.0
Management and administrative.......................... 18.7 20.1 27.7
Non-cash stock compensation expense.................... 0.0 0.0 2.9
----- ----- -----
Total operating expenses.................................. 87.7 87.7 106.5
----- ----- -----
Operating income (loss)................................... 12.3 12.3 (6.5)
Interest income, net and other............................ 0.5 5.3 7.2
----- ----- -----
Income before income taxes................................ 12.7 17.7 0.7
----- ----- -----
Income tax expense........................................ 6.9 1.1
----- -----
Net income (loss)......................................... 10.8% (0.4)%
===== =====
Pro forma information (1):
Revenues.................................................. 100.0%
Operating expenses:
Project personnel and related expenses................. 55.2
Sales and marketing.................................... 14.8
Recruiting, retention and training..................... 6.0
Management and administrative.......................... 27.7
Non-cash, non-recurring stock compensation expense (1). 0.0
-----
Total pro forma operating expenses........................ 103.7
-----
Pro forma operating income (loss)......................... (3.7)
Interest, income, net and other........................... 7.2
-----
Pro forma income before pro forma income taxes............ 12.7 3.5
Pro forma income tax expense.............................. 5.1 1.1
----- -----
Pro forma net income...................................... 7.6% 2.5%
===== =====
(1) In 2001 Inforte incurred a non-cash, non-recurring stock compensation
expense of $1,374 for a performance-based option, which is recognized as an
expense under GAAP. This option was granted in 1997 with an exercise price
equal to the fair market value at the time of grant and with vesting based
on achieving specified corporate performance criteria. Once vesting is
probable (the "measurement date") GAAP requires recording of an expense
equal to the difference between fair market value on the measurement date
and the exercise price times the number of shares granted under the option.
With typical time-based vesting criteria, the measurement date equals the
grant date and no expense is recorded normally. The performance-based
vesting criteria on this option was more difficult to achieve than the
normal time-based criteria of a typical Inforte option. Thus, Inforte
believes that the application of GAAP to this option grant, which results
in lower GAAP earnings despite vesting criteria more advantageous to
Inforte than typical, is misleading to investors and reduces comparability
of results from different periods. The pro forma information shows results
excluding this non-cash expense. This expense had no impact on income tax
expense. The pro forma diluted earnings per share calculation uses weighted
average common shares outstanding that include dilutive common stock
equivalents. There will be no expense from this option in future years.
18
Quarterly Results of Operations
The following tables set forth certain unaudited quarterly results of
operations of Inforte for 2000 and 2001. The quarterly operating results are
not necessarily indicative of future results of operations.
Three Months Ended (unaudited)
-------------------------------------------------------
Mar. 31, 2000 Jun. 30, 2000 Sep. 30, 2000 Dec. 31, 2000
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Revenues................................... $12,290,000 $16,393,162 $17,790,784 $17,365,014
Operating expenses:
Project personnel and related expenses.. 5,408,772 7,123,510 7,910,215 7,739,504
Sales and marketing..................... 1,561,941 2,228,910 2,359,848 2,433,030
Recruiting, retention and training...... 1,406,296 2,100,327 1,731,123 1,122,595
Management and administrative........... 2,443,543 2,880,835 3,525,504 3,980,624
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total operating expenses................... 10,820,552 14,333,582 15,526,690 15,275,753
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Operating income........................... 1,469,448 2,059,580 2,264,094 2,089,261
Interest income, net, and other............ 340,501 900,979 1,053,800 1,091,126
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Income before income taxes................. 1,809,949 2,960,559 3,317,894 3,180,387
Income tax expense......................... 778,344 1,131,140 1,244,994 1,240,351
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net income................................. $ 1,031,605 $ 1,829,419 $ 2,072,900 $ 1,940,036
=========== =========== =========== ===========
Earnings per share
Diluted (1)............................. $ 0.08 $ 0.13 $ 0.15 $ 0.14
=========== =========== =========== ===========
Weighted-average common shares outstanding:
Diluted................................. 12,431,917 13,832,411 13,946,224 13,803,361
=========== =========== =========== ===========
Three Months Ended (unaudited)
------------------------------------------------------
Mar. 31, 2000 Jun. 30, 2000 Sep. 30, 2000 Dec. 31, 2000
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
As a percentage of revenues:
Revenues.................................. 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Operating expenses:
Project personnel and related expenses. 44.0 43.5 44.5 44.6
Sales and marketing.................... 12.7 13.6 13.3 14.0
Recruiting, retention and training..... 11.4 12.8 9.7 6.5
Management and administrative.......... 19.9 17.6 19.8 22.9
----- ----- ----- -----
Total operating expenses.................. 88.0 87.4 87.3 88.0
----- ----- ----- -----
Operating income.......................... 12.0 12.6 12.7 12.0
Interest income, net, and other........... 2.8 5.5 5.9 6.3
----- ----- ----- -----
Income before income taxes................ 14.7 18.1 18.6 18.3
Income tax expense........................ 6.3 6.9 7.0 7.1
----- ----- ----- -----
Net income................................ 8.4% 11.2% 11.7% 11.2%
===== ===== ===== =====
19
Three Months Ended (unaudited)
------------------------------------------------------
Mar. 31, 2001 Jun. 30, 2001 Sep. 30, 2001 Dec. 31, 2001
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Revenues....................................... $14,051,153 $12,537,832 $10,600,439 $10,546,182
Operating expenses:
Project personnel and related expenses...... 7,396,824 7,378,815 5,876,560 5,681,583
Sales and marketing......................... 1,858,591 2,129,456 1,804,975 1,280,368
Recruiting, retention and training.......... 924,081 709,957 596,767 638,551
Management and administrative............... 3,447,453 3,098,569 3,083,137 3,577,892
Non-cash stock compensation expense......... -- -- -- 1,374,000
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total operating expenses....................... 13,626,949 13,316,797 11,361,439 12,552,394
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Operating income (loss)........................ 424,204 (778,965) (761,000) (2,006,212)
Interest income, net, and other................ 1,013,331 898,435 870,372 651,298
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Income (loss) before income taxes.............. 1,437,535 119,470 109,372 (1,354,914)
Income tax expense............................. 503,134 -- -- --
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net income (loss).............................. $ 934,401 $ 119,470 $ 109,372 $(1,354,914)
=========== =========== =========== ===========
Earnings per share:
Diluted (1)................................. $ 0.07 $ 0.01 $ 0.01 $ (0.12)
=========== =========== =========== ===========
Weighted-average common shares outstanding:
Diluted..................................... 13,699,582 13,632,087 13,521,401 11,604,596
=========== =========== =========== ===========
Pro forma information:
Pro forma operating income (loss) (2).......... (632,212)
Interest income, net and other................. 651,298
-----------
Pro forma income (loss) before pro forma income
taxes........................................ 19,086
-----------
Income tax expense............................. --
-----------
Pro forma net income (loss).................... 19,086
-----------
Pro forma earnings per share (unaudited):
Diluted..................................... $ 0.00
===========
Pro forma weighted-average common shares
outstanding:
Diluted..................................... 12,244,785
===========
20
Three Months Ended (unaudited)
------------------------------------------------------
Mar. 31, 2001 Jun. 30, 2001 Sep. 30, 2001 Dec. 31, 2001
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
As a percentage of revenues:
Revenues....................................... 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Operating expenses:
Project personnel and related expenses...... 52.6 58.9 55.4 53.9
Sales and marketing......................... 13.2 17.0 17.0 12.1
Recruiting, retention and training.......... 6.6 5.7 5.6 6.1
Management and administrative............... 24.5 24.7 29.1 33.9
Non-cash stock compensation expense......... 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.0
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total operating expenses....................... 97.0 106.2 107.2 119.0
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Operating income............................... 3.0 (6.2) (7.2) (19.0)
Interest income, net, and other................ 7.2 7.2 8.2 6.2
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Income before income taxes..................... 10.2 1.0 1.0 (12.8)
Income tax expense (benefit)................... 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net income..................................... 6.6% 1.0% 1.0% (12.8%)
=========== =========== =========== ===========
Earnings per share:
Diluted (1)................................. $ 0.07 $ 0.01 $ 0.01 $ (0.12)
=========== =========== =========== ===========
Weighted-average common shares outstanding:
Diluted..................................... 13,699,582 13,632,087 13,521,401 11,604,596
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Pro forma information:.........................
Pro forma operating income (loss) (2).......... (6.0%)
Interest income, net and other................. 6.2
-----------
Pro forma income (loss) before pro forma income
taxes........................................ 0.2
Income tax expense............................. 0.0
-----------
Pro forma net income (loss).................... 0.2%
===========
Pro forma earnings per share (unaudited):
Diluted..................................... $ 0.00
===========
Pro forma weighted-average common shares
outstanding:
Diluted..................................... 12,244,785
-----------
(1) Sum of quarters does not equal year due to differences in average shares
outstanding.
(2) In 2001 Inforte incurred a non-cash, non-recurring stock compensation
expense of $1,374 for a performance-based option, which is recognized as an
expense under GAAP. This option was granted in 1997 with an exercise price
equal to the fair market value at the time of grant and with vesting based
on achieving specified corporate performance criteria. Once vesting is
probable (the "measurement date") GAAP requires recording of an expense
equal to the difference between fair market value on the measurement date
and the exercise price times the number of shares granted under the option.
With typical time-based vesting criteria, the measurement date equals the
grant date and no expense is recorded normally. The performance-based
vesting criteria on this option was more difficult to achieve than the
normal time-based criteria of a typical Inforte option. Thus, Inforte
believes that the application of GAAP to this option grant, which results
in lower GAAP earnings despite vesting criteria more advantageous to
Inforte than typical, is misleading to investors and reduces comparability
of results from different periods. The pro forma information shows results
excluding this non-cash expense. This expense had no impact on income tax
expense. The pro forma diluted earnings per share calculation uses weighted
average common shares outstanding that include dilutive common stock
equivalents. There will be no expense from this option in future years.
Years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001
Revenues. Revenues decreased $16.1 million or 25% to $47.7 million for the year
ended December 31, 2001 from $63.8 million for the year ended December 31,
2000. Although we have historically experienced growth in our revenues, the
market for strategic technology consulting services has decreased significantly
in 2001 due to the U.S. recession and the negative impact that heightened
economic uncertainty has on information technology spending. For the year ended
December 31, 2001, we had 43 significant clients with each of these clients
21
contributing $1.0 million to revenue on average. We had 43 significant clients
during the year ended December 31, 2000, each contributing $1.3 million to
revenue on average. We did not have a client accounting for more than 10% of
our revenues in either 2000 or 2001. On a quarterly basis in 2000, revenue
followed typical seasonal patterns with higher sequential growth during the
first half of 2000. This pattern did not hold in 2001, however, as revenue
declined sequentially each quarter due to the U.S. recession and the technology
spending slowdown.
Given the current economic environment, we expect revenue for the March 2002
quarter to equal $8.5 million. Until we see a sustained turn in the economy and
a sustained increase in information technology spending, we are forecasting
revenue of $8.5 million per quarter in 2002.
Project personnel and related expenses. Project personnel and related expenses
consist primarily of compensation and fringe benefits for our professional
employees who deliver consulting services and non-reimbursable project costs.
All labor costs for project personnel are included in project personnel and
related expenses. These expenses decreased $1.8 million or 7% to $26.3 million
for the year ended December 31, 2001, from $28.2 million for year ended
December 31, 2000. The decrease results from reductions in consulting
headcount, primarily in the third quarter of 2001. We employed 217 and 340
consultants on December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
Project personnel and related expenses represented 55.2% of revenues for the
year ended December 31, 2001, compared to 44.1% for the year ended December 31,
2001. This increase is due to revenue declining at a higher rate than the rate
of expense declines. Revenue per consultant was $173,000 in the year ended
December 31, 2001, down from $214,000 in the year ended December 31, 2000. The
decline in revenue per consultant versus the prior year results primarily from
lower consultant utilization and secondarily from a lower hourly rate due to
more price sensitivity in the consulting market.
In June 2001 Inforte offered a six-to-nine-month voluntary leave of absence
program and a voluntary resignation program to employees in underutilized
areas. Approximately 90 people participated in the programs. Individuals who
selected the leave of absence program received compensation at 20%-25% of
regular pay if they remained available to return to full-time service.
Individuals who chose the voluntary resignation package received pay through
the end of August 2001. All costs related to resigning employees were included
either in our June 2001 quarter results or our September 2001 quarter results.
Salary costs for employees on leave of absence were expensed as incurred and
included in the quarters ended September 2001 and December 2001. The costs of
these programs will be less in future quarters, and will go to zero by the end
of the June 2002 quarter. In October 2001 and in January 2002, Inforte again
offered voluntary programs similar to the June 2001 program, however these
latter programs were smaller in scope, involving approximately 20 and 30
people, respectively.
Sales and marketing. Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of
compensation, benefits and travel costs for employees in the market development
and practice development groups and costs to execute marketing programs. Sales
and marketing expenses decreased $1.5 million or 18% to $7.1 million for the
year ended December 31, 2001 from $8.6 million in 2000. Factors causing the
spending decrease include lower sales bonuses because of lower revenue during
the year, reduced market development spending in 2001 by our partners resulting
in less co-marketing expenses related to those partnerships, and lower spending
on discretionary marketing activities. These decreases were partially offset by
a higher average number of commissioned salespeople in 2001 compared to 2000.
Sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of revenues increased to 14.8% for
the year ended December 31, 2001 from 13.4% in 2000. During 2001, we
intentionally decreased sales and marketing expenses at a rate slower than the
rate at which revenue declined. We expect sales and marketing spending in 2002
to be similar to or higher than the levels experienced in 2001. Based on
current revenue forecasts, we expect sales and marketing expenses to increase
as a percent of revenue.
Recruiting, retention and training. Recruiting, retention and training expenses
consist of compensation, benefits, and travel costs for personnel engaged in
human resources; costs to recruit new employees; costs of
22
human resources programs; and training costs. These expenses decreased by $3.5
million or 55% to $2.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 from $6.4
million in the year of 2000. The decrease in spending is due primarily to
reduced recruiting activities and the lower costs associated with recruiting
finder fees, signing bonuses, relocation allowances, employee referral bonuses
and candidate travel. Other factors causing spending to decline include less
spending on company-wide meetings and other employee events and less training
activity due to lower headcount and fewer new hires. The number of employees
declined from 442 as of December 31, 2000 to 294 as of December 31, 2001, a
decrease of 148. As a percentage of revenues, recruiting, retention and
training dropped to 6.0% in 2001 from 10.0% in 2000. We anticipate limited
hiring to continue going forward until we see a sustained turn in the economy
and a sustained increase in information technology spending. As a result, we
expect that recruiting, retention and training spending could remain at below
normal levels in 2002, although based on current revenue forecasts, we expect
recruiting, retention and training expenses could increase as a percent of
revenue.
Management and administrative. Management and administrative expenses consist
primarily of compensation, benefits and travel costs for management, finance,
information technology and facilities personnel, together with rent,
telecommunications, audit and legal costs, and depreciation and amortization of
capitalized computers, purchased software, and property. Management and
administrative expense, increased 3% to $13.2 million in 2001 from $12.8
million in 2000. We reduced spending in most departments in 2001. Additionally,
executive bonus compensation was lower in 2001. These declines, however, were
offset by costs associated with our effort to consolidate office space at the
Chicago location where Inforte had multiple contractual rental commitments.
Estimated costs for the consolidation of facilities comprise contractual rental
commitments for office space being vacated and related costs in addition to
future depreciation of the related leasehold improvements, offset by estimated
sub-lease income. The total charge related to this reduction of office space in
2001 was $1.1 million. If future sub-lease income is less than estimated or if
we are unable to sub-lease our vacated space, additional charges in future
periods will be necessary. For the year ended December 31, 2001, pro forma
management and administrative expenses increased as a percent of revenue to
27.7% from 20.1% in the prior year period, as revenue declined and expenses
increased slightly. While we expect management and administrative expenses may
decline in 2002 relative to levels experienced in 2001, based on current
revenue forecasts, it is possible that management and administrative expenses
could increase as a percentage of revenue in 2002.
Interest income, net and other. During the year ended December 31, 2001,
interest income, net and other was $3.4 million, similar to the amount in the
year ended December 31, 2000. The negative effect of lower interest rates in
2001 was offset by the higher average cash and marketable securities balances
we maintained in 2001 as compared to 2000.
Income tax expense. Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2001 was
161.5% of pre-tax income versus income tax expense of 39.0% of pre-tax income
in 2000. This unusually high tax rate for 2001 results primarily from expenses
not deductible for income tax purposes including the non-cash, non-recurring
stock compensation expense. Excluding the non-cash, non-recurring stock
compensation expense, effective income tax expense was 29.9% of pre-tax income
in 2001. The decrease of the tax rate, excluding the non-cash, non-recurring
stock compensation expense, in 2001 versus 2000 reflects the increase in
tax-free and tax-advantaged investment earnings as a percentage of total
pre-tax book income.
Years ended December 31, 1999 and 2000
Revenues. Revenues increased $33.8 million or 112% to $63.8 million for the
year ended December 31, 2000 from $30.1 million for the year ended December 31,
1999. This growth reflected increases in the number of client engagements and
in average revenue per client. For the year ended December 31, 2000, we had 43
significant clients with each of these clients contributing $1.3 million to
revenue on average. We had 29 significant clients during the year ended
December 31, 1999, each contributing $0.9 million to revenue on average. We did
not have a client accounting for more than 10% of our revenues in either 1999
or 2000. On a quarterly basis, revenue followed typical seasonal patterns with
higher sequential growth during the first half of 2000.
23
Project personnel and related expenses. Project personnel and related expenses
increased $15.3 million or 119% to $28.2 million for the year ended December
31, 2000, from $12.8 million for year ended December 31, 1999. The increase was
due to the hiring of additional consulting professionals. We employed 340 and
196 consultants on December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
Project personnel and related expenses represented 44.1% of revenues for the
year ended December 31, 2000, compared to 42.7% for the year ended December 31,
1999. The increase as a percentage of revenues was due to lower utilization
which caused revenue per consultant to grow at a slower rate than the rate of
employee compensation. Revenue per consultant increased to $214,000 for the
year ended December 31, 2000 from $210,000 in 1999. In the first half of 2000
we actively managed utilization levels downward so that our consultants could
maintain a more balanced life style and could invest more time in training and
skill development. Later in the year, utilization declined further as a
weakening economy reduced demand for our services.
Sales and marketing. Sales and marketing expenses increased $3.6 million or 73%
to $8.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2000 from $4.9 million in 1999.
The spending increase was due to the growth in our sales force and increased
marketing activities to develop the Inforte brand. Sales and marketing expenses
as a percentage of revenues decreased to 13.4% for the year ended December 31,
2000 from 16.4% in the same period in 1999. During 1999 we grew sales and
marketing expenses at a faster rate than the rate of revenue growth in 1999.
Having made these investments in 1999, we grew sales and marketing expenses at
a slower rate than the rate of revenue growth in 2000.
Recruiting, retention and training. Recruiting, retention and training expenses
increased by $3.4 million or 113% to $6.4 million for the year ended December
31, 2000 from $3.0 million in the year of 1999. Of the dollar spending
increase, approximately one-half was due to increased training expenses, such
as software certification courses, programming classes and skill development
training courses. The remaining spending was related to the recruiting and
retention of employees. The number of employees grew from 257 as of December
31, 1999 to 442 as of December 31, 2000, an increase of 185. As a percentage of
revenues, recruiting, retention and training remained steady at 10.0% and 9.9%
for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
Management and administrative. Management and administrative expenses increased
$7.2 million or 128% to $12.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2000 from
$5.6 million for the same period in 1999. The increase occurred in all areas
cited above due to the ongoing growth of our business. For the year ended
December 31, 2000, management and administrative expenses increased as a
percent of revenue to 20.1% from 18.7% in the prior year period, as facilities
and technology spending grew more rapidly than the rate of revenue growth, and
due to investor relations spending required in 2000 once Inforte became a
public company.
Interest income, net and other. During the year ended December 31, 2000,
interest income, net and other was $3.4 million, up from $147,000 for the year
ended December 31, 1999. The increase resulted from higher average cash
balances in 2000 as compared to 1999 primarily due to our initial public
offering, and also due to our positive cash generation throughout the year.
Income tax expense. Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2000 was
39.0% of pre-tax income in 2000 versus pro forma income tax expense of 40.2% of
pre-tax income in 1999. Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2000
was $4.4 million, an increase of $2.9 million or 185%, as compared to pro forma
income tax expense of $1.5 million in 1999. The increase in income tax expense
was primarily due to higher taxable income in 2000. Pre-tax income for the year
ended December 31, 2000 was $11.3 million, as compared to $3.8 million in 1999.
The decline in tax rate from a pro forma tax rate of 40.2% in 1999 to a tax
rate of 39.0% in 2000 was primarily due to a lower average tax rate on interest
income resulting from some investments in tax-advantaged securities.
24
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash and cash equivalents decreased from $42.4 million as of December 31, 2000
to $20.2 million at December 31, 2001. Short-term marketable securities
increased from $26.2 million as of December 31, 2000 to $32.7 million as of
December 31, 2001. Long-term marketable securities increased from $14.4 million
as of December 31, 2000 to $22.2 million as of December 31, 2001. Short-term
and long-term marketable securities are entirely conservative
available-for-sale securities consisting of commercial paper, U.S. government
or municipal notes and bonds, corporate bonds and corporate auction preferreds.
In total, cash and cash equivalents, short-term and long-term marketable
securities decreased from $83.0 million to $75.1 million during the year ended
December 31, 2001, a decline of $7.9 million. This decrease is a result of
outflows of $14.5 million to purchase Inforte common stock through our buyback
program and $0.4 million for capital expenditures, offset by inflows of $5.7
million from operating activities and $1.3 million from cash received from
employees participating in the stock purchase and stock option plans.
Capital expenditures for years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 were $0.4
million and $2.7 million respectively. These expenditures were primarily for
computer equipment and software, leasehold improvements, and office furniture.
We expect that capital expenditures will stay at low levels until we see a
sustained pickup in business activity. Nevertheless, capital expenditures could
rise in 2002 from the abnormally low level in 2001 due to deferred spending
needs.
As of December 31, 2001 our accounts receivable (less deferred revenue) equaled
negative 24 days of sales outstanding. However, since December 31, 1997,
quarter-ending days of sales outstanding have been as high as positive 41 days.
We believe that we will have adequate cash flow to manage our working capital
needs in the ordinary course of business.
Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2001
totaled $5.7 million. Net cash provided by operating activities in the year
ended December 31, 2001 was primarily attributed to decreases in accounts
receivable of $3.8 million and in income taxes of $2.6 million, plus net
income, depreciation and amortization and non-cash compensation which totaled
$3.0 million. These cash flows provided by operating activities were partially
offset by the decrease in accrued expenses and other of $2.2 million and the
increase in deferred income taxes of $0.8 million. Net cash provided by
operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2000 totaled $10.5
million. Net cash provided by operating activities in the year ended December
31, 2000 was primarily attributed to net income of $6.9 million, and to a
lesser extent the increases in accrued expenses and other of $3.6 million and
deferred revenue of $3.7 million. These cash flows provided by operating
activities were partially offset by the increases in accounts receivable of
$2.9 million and prepaid expense and other current assets of $1.2 million.
Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2001
totaled $14.8 million, used primarily to purchase short-term and long-term
investments of $14.4 million and to a lesser extent to purchase computers,
purchased software, and property of $0.4 million. Net cash used in investing
activities for the year ended December 31, 2000 totaled $43.2 million, used
primarily to purchase short-term and long-term investments of $40.5 million and
to a lesser extent to purchase computers, purchased software, and property of
$2.7 million.
Net cash used by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2001
totaled $13.2 million, used mainly for purchases of treasury stock of $14.5
million, partially offset by the proceeds from stock issued under stock option
and purchase plans of $1.3 million. Net cash provided by financing activities
for the year ended December 31, 2000 totaled $71.3 million, consisting of the
proceeds from our initial public offering of $66.9 million and proceeds from
stock issued under stock option and purchase plans of $4.4 million.
All highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when
purchased are considered cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalent balances
consist of obligations of U.S. banks, high-grade commercial paper and other
high quality, short-term obligations of U.S. companies. Short-term and
long-term marketable
25
securities are available-for-sale securities which are recorded at fair market
value. The difference between amortized cost and fair market value, net of tax
effect, is shown as a separate component of stockholders' equity. The cost of
securities available-for-sale is adjusted for amortization of premiums and
discounts to maturity. Interest and amortization of premiums and discounts for
all securities are included in interest income.
Inforte believes that its current cash, cash equivalents and short-term
investments will be sufficient to meet working capital and capital expenditure
requirements for the foreseeable future. Net working capital as of December 31,
2001 and 2000 was $47.6 and $65.3 million, respectively.
Revenues pursuant to fixed-fee contracts are generally recognized as services
are rendered on the percentage-of-completion method of accounting based on the
ratio of costs incurred to total estimated costs. The cumulative impact of any
revision in estimates of the percent complete is reflected in the period in
which the changes become known. Revenues pursuant to time-and-material
contracts are generally recognized as services are performed. Amounts billed
prior to rendering services are classified as deferred revenue. Revenues
exclude reimbursable expenses chargeable to the client.
In November 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board's Emerging Issues
Task Force issued Topic D-103, "Income Statement Characterization of
Reimbursements Received for 'Out-of-Pocket' Expenses Incurred," stating these
costs should be characterized as revenue in the income statement if billed to
customers. The Company is required to adopt this change beginning in calendar
2002 and will reclassify prior periods in the comparative consolidated
financial statements. The Company has historically treated these reimbursable
costs as rebillable invoices to the respective customer and has not included
them in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company has not yet
determined the amount of these out-of-pocket reimbursable expenses for prior
years, but estimates that these costs will approximate 10%-20% of previously
reported revenue. This pronouncement will not affect net income as revenue and
expenses will both increase by offsetting amounts.
An allowance for doubtful accounts is maintained for potential credit losses.
The amount of the reserve is established analyzing all client accounts to
determine credit risk. Criteria considered are, slow payment history, no
payment history, poor financial condition of the client and the size of the
outstanding balance from the client.
Inforte has several operating leases which have contractual obligations for
future payments. There are no other contractual obligations which require
future cash obligations or other commitments. The table below identifies all
future commitments. See "Item 2. Properties" and note 11 in "Item 8.
Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for more information.
Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations (in thousands)
----------------------- -----------------------------
2005
and
Total 2002 2003-2004 beyond
------ ----- --------- ------
Long-term debt.................... -- -- -- --
Capital lease obligations......... -- -- -- --
Operating leases.................. 10,143 2,284 4,807 3,051
Unconditional purchase obligations -- -- -- --
Other long-term obligations....... -- -- -- --
Total contractual cash obligations 10,143 2,284 4,807 3,051
Inforte Corp. has a wholly owned subsidiary, Inforte Investments Inc., a
Delaware corporation, which functions as a holding company for Inforte Corp.'s
investments. Inforte Investments Inc. has no operations other than holding
investments of Inforte Corp. and no contractual commitments requiring future
cash obligations. The financial position and results of operations for Inforte
Investments Inc. are consolidated, in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, in the financial statements reported in this document.
26
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 1999, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (''FASB'') issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (''SFAS'') No. 133, ''Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,'' as amended by SFAS No.
137, which modified the effective date of SFAS 133 to all fiscal quarters of
all fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2000. SFAS 133, as amended, requires
that all derivative instruments be recorded on the balance sheet at their fair
value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded each period in
current earnings or other comprehensive income, depending on whether a
derivative is designated as part of a hedge transaction and, if it is, the type
of hedge transaction. The adoption of SFAS 133 had no effect on the
accompanying consolidated financial statements when adopted by Inforte on
January 1, 2001.
In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standard No. 141, "Business Combinations", and No. 142,
"Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets", effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2001. Under the new rules, goodwill and intangible assets
deemed to have indefinite lives will no longer be amortized but will be subject
to annual impairment tests in accordance with the Statements. Other intangible
assets will continue to be amortized over their useful lives. The adoption of
statements No. 141 and No. 142 will not have a material impact on the Company's
results of operations or financial position.
In October 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standard No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (Statement 144) which supersedes Statement No.
121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived
Assets to Be Disposed Of" and the accounting and reporting provisions of
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30, "Reporting the Results of
Operations--Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and
Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions", for
the disposal of a segment of a business (as defined in that Opinion). Statement
144 retains the fundamental provisions of Statement 121 concerning the
recognition and measurement of the impairment of long-lived assets to be held
and used and the measurement of long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale but
provides additional guidance with regard to discontinued operations and assets
to be disposed of. Furthermore, Statement 144 excludes goodwill from its scope
and, therefore, eliminates the requirement under Statement 121 to allocate
goodwill to long-lived assets to be tested for impairment. Statement 144 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. The adoption of
statement No. 144 will not have a material impact on the Company's results of
operations or financial position.
In November 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board's Emerging Issues
Task Force issued Topic D-103, "Income Statement Characterization of
Reimbursements Received for 'Out-of-Pocket' Expenses Incurred" stating these
costs should be characterized as revenue in the income statement if billed to
customers. The Company is required to adopt this change beginning in calendar
2002 and will reclassify prior periods in the comparative consolidated
financial statements. The Company has historically treated these reimbursable
costs as rebillable invoices to the respective customer and has not included
them in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company has not yet
determined the amount of these out-of-pocket reimbursable expenses for prior
years, but estimates that these costs will approximate 10%-20% of previously
reported revenue. This pronouncement will not affect net income as revenue and
expenses will both increase by offsetting amounts.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Foreign Currency Risk
During 2001, our international revenues were over 10% of our total revenues. As
our international revenue grows, we face additional risks that we do not face
domestically. Such risks include longer customer payment cycles, adverse taxes
and compliance with local laws and regulations. Further, the effects of
fluctuations in currency exchange rates may adversely affect the results of
operations. Finally, there are indications that the U.S. economic slowdown is
spreading to the rest of the world, which could limit our ability to obtain
international revenue going forward.
27
Interest Rate Risk
As of December 31, 2001 Inforte's total short-term and long-term marketable
securities equaled $75.1 million. During 2001, interest income represented over
100% of Inforte's pre-tax income. As a result, fluctuations in interest rates
can have a significant impact on our earnings per share. We estimate that the
impact on interest income from a 1 percentage point change in interest rates
could change our annual earnings per share by approximately $0.05 per diluted
share. Our estimate is calculated using December 31, 2001 investment balances
and diluted weighted average shares outstanding.
ITEM 8. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The following consolidated financial statements, and the related notes thereto,
of Inforte and the Report of Independent Auditors are filed as a part of this
Form 10-K.
Page
----
Report of Independent Auditors................ 29
Balance Sheets................................ 30
Consolidated Statements of Operations......... 31
Statements of Stockholders' Equity............ 32
Statements of Cash Flows...................... 33
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 34
28
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
Stockholders and Board of Directors
Inforte Corp.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Inforte Corp. as of December
31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2001. Our audits also included the financial statement
schedule listed in the Index at Item 14. These financial statements and
schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Inforte Corp. at
December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered
in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Chicago, Illinois
January 24, 2002
29
INFORTE CORP.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31,
------------------------
2000 2001
----------- ------------
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents.................................................. $42,391,880 $ 20,207,793
Short-term marketable securities........................................... 26,220,945 32,669,067
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,150,000 in
2000 and 2001............................................................ 9,235,795 5,388,567
Prepaid expenses and other current assets.................................. 1,905,936 2,008,982
Recoverable income tax..................................................... 1,545,769 --
Deferred income taxes...................................................... 876,581 1,620,989
----------- ------------
Total current assets................................................... 82,176,906 61,895,398
Computers, purchased software and property, net............................... 2,977,167 1,860,945
Long-term marketable securities............................................... 14,383,998 22,240,526
Deferred income taxes......................................................... 364,905 462,384
----------- ------------
Total assets........................................................... $99,902,976 $ 86,459,253
=========== ============
Liabilities and stockholders' equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable........................................................... $ 582,591 $ 399,933
Income taxes payable....................................................... -- 167,208
Accrued expenses........................................................... 7,702,466 5,524,124
Deferred revenue........................................................... 8,574,055 8,164,685
----------- ------------
Total current liabilities.............................................. 16,859,112 14,255,950
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $0.001; 5,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and
outstanding at December 31, 2000 and 2001................................ -- --
Common stock, $0.001 par value in 2000; authorized--50,000,000 shares;
issued and outstanding--12,702,926 at December 31, 2000 and
11,591,564 as of December 31, 2001....................................... 12,703 11,592
Additional paid-in capital................................................. 74,192,205 77,916,384
Cost of common stock in treasury, 1,492,702 shares at December 31, 2001.... -- (14,502,306)
Retained earnings.......................................................... 8,753,017 8,561,346
Accumulated other comprehensive income..................................... 85,939 216,287
----------- ------------
Total stockholders' equity............................................. 83,043,864 72,203,303
----------- ------------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity............................. $99,902,976 $ 86,459,253
=========== ============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
30
INFORTE CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Year ended December 31,
-----------------------------------
1999 2000 2001
----------- ----------- -----------
Revenues................................... $30,088,477 $63,838,960 $47,735,606
Operating expenses:
Project personnel and related expenses.. 12,845,711 28,182,001 26,333,782
Sales and marketing..................... 4,949,494 8,583,729 7,073,390
Recruiting, retention and training...... 2,986,896 6,360,341 2,869,356
Management and administrative........... 5,617,572 12,830,506 13,207,051
Non-cash stock compensation expense..... -- -- 1,374,000
----------- ----------- -----------
Total operating expenses................... 26,399,673 55,956,577 50,857,579
----------- ----------- -----------
Operating income (loss).................... 3,688,804 7,882,383 (3,121,973)
Interest income, net and other............. 147,187 3,386,406 3,433,436
----------- ----------- -----------
Income before income taxes................. 3,835,991 11,268,789 311,463
Income tax expense......................... 1,286,661 4,394,829 503,134
----------- ----------- -----------
Net income (loss).......................... $ 2,549,330 $ 6,873,960 $ (191,671)
=========== =========== ===========
Earnings per share:
Basic............................... $ 0.57 $ (0.02)
=========== ===========
Diluted............................. $ 0.51 $ (0.02)
=========== ===========
Weighted Average common shares outstanding:
Basic............................... 8,635,537 12,050,560 12,472,070
=========== =========== ===========
Diluted............................. 10,786,978 13,501,447 12,472,070
=========== =========== ===========
Pro forma net income data (unaudited):
Pro forma income before income taxes
Pro forma income tax expense............ $ 1,542,479
-----------
Pro forma net income.................... $ 2,293,512
===========
Pro forma earnings per share:
Basic............................... $ 0.27
===========
Diluted............................. $ 0.21
===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
31
INFORTE CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common Stock Accumulated
--------------------- Additional Other
Number Paid-In Notes Treasury Retained Comprehensive
Of Shares Amount Capital Receivable Stock Earnings Income
---------- --------- ----------- ---------- ------------- ----------- -------------
Balance at January 01, 1999.... 8,375,000 $ 247,550 $ -- $(33,306) $ -- $ 1,447,164 $ --
Exercise of stock options... 1,346,154 174,057 -- -- -- -- --
Subchapter S distributions.. -- -- -- -- -- (2,117,437) --
Proceeds from note
receivable................. -- -- -- 33,306 -- -- --
Reclassification of amount
due to change from no
par value stock to
$0.001 par value share..... -- (411,886) 411,886 -- -- -- --
Net income and
comprehensive income....... -- -- -- -- -- 2,549,330 --
---------- --------- ----------- -------- ------------- ----------- --------
Balance at December 31,
1999.......................... 9,721,154 9,721 411,886 -- -- 1,879,057 --
Stock option and purchase
plans...................... 681,772 682 4,448,654 -- -- -- --
Proceeds from public
offering................... 2,300,000 2,300 66,857,951 -- -- -- --
Compensation recognized
related to stock options... -- -- 50,000 -- -- -- --
Tax benefit of
disqualifying
dispositions of stock
options.................... -- -- 2,423,714 -- -- -- --
Comprehensive income:
Foreign currency
translation adjustments.... -- -- -- -- -- -- 9,088
Unrealized gain on
available-for-sale
securities................. -- -- -- -- -- -- 76,851
Net income.................. -- -- -- -- -- 6,873,960 --
Comprehensive income........ -- -- -- -- -- -- --
---------- --------- ----------- -------- ------------- ----------- --------
Balance at December 31,
2000.......................... 12,702,926 12,703 74,192,205 -- -- 8,753,017 85,939
Stock option and Purchase
plans...................... 381,340 382 1,319,317 -- -- -- --
Compensation recognized
related to stock options... -- -- 1,549,000 -- -- -- --
Tax benefit of
disqualifying
dispositions of stock
options.................... -- -- 855,862 -- -- -- --
Purchase of common
stock for treasury......... (1,492,702) (1,493) -- -- (14,502,306) -- --
Comprehensive income:
Foreign currency
translation adjustments.... -- -- -- -- -- -- (26,509)
Unrealized gain on
available-for-sale
securities................. -- -- -- -- -- -- 156,857
Net income (loss)........... -- -- -- -- -- (191,671) --
Comprehensive loss.......... -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Balance at December 31,
2001.......................... 11,591,564 $ 11,592 $77,916,384 $ -- ($ 14,502,306) $ 8,561,346 $216,287
========== ========= =========== ======== ============= =========== ========
Total
Stockholders'
Equity
-------------
Balance at January 01, 1999.... $ 1,661,408
Exercise of stock options... 174,057
Subchapter S distributions.. (2,117,437)
Proceeds from note
receivable................. 33,306
Reclassification of amount
due to change from no
par value stock to
$0.001 par value share..... --
Net income and
comprehensive income....... 2,549,330
------------
Balance at December 31,
1999.......................... 2,300,664
Stock option and purchase
plans...................... 4,449,336
Proceeds from public
offering................... 66,860,251
Compensation recognized
related to stock options... 50,000
Tax benefit of
disqualifying
dispositions of stock
options.................... 2,423,714
Comprehensive income:
Foreign currency
translation adjustments.... 9,088
Unrealized gain on
available-for-sale
securities................. 76,851
Net income.................. 6,873,960
Comprehensive income........ 6,959,899
------------
Balance at December 31,
2000.......................... 83,043,864
Stock option and Purchase
plans...................... 1,319,699
Compensation recognized
related to stock options... 1,549,000
Tax benefit of
disqualifying
dispositions of stock
options.................... 855,862
Purchase of common
stock for treasury......... (14,503,799)
Comprehensive income:
Foreign currency
translation adjustments.... (26,509)
Unrealized gain on
available-for-sale
securities................. 156,857
Net income (loss)........... (191,671)
Comprehensive loss.......... (61,323)
------------
Balance at December 31,
2001.......................... $ 72,203,303
============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
32
INFORTE CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year ended December 31,
---------------------------------------
1999 2000 2001
----------- ------------ ------------
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income (loss)................................................. $ 2,549,330 $ 6,873,960 $ (191,671)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by
operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization..................................... 555,368 1,225,187 1,682,601
Compensation recognized related to stock options.................. -- 50,000 1,549,000
Deferred income taxes............................................. (672,059) (569,427) (841,887)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable........................................ (4,299,992) (2,911,545) 3,847,228
Prepaid expenses and other current assets.................. (583,923) (1,224,373) (103,046)
Accounts payable........................................... 875,488 (769,881) (182,658)
Income taxes............................................... 311,512 566,433 2,568,839
Accrued expenses and other................................. 2,622,451 3,580,291 (2,178,342)
Deferred revenue........................................... 2,951,151 3,703,476 (409,370)
----------- ------------ ------------
Net cash provided by operating activities......................... 4,309,326 10,524,121 5,740,694
----------- ------------ ------------
Cash flows from investing activities
Note receivable--Stockholder...................................... 139,496 -- --
Purchases of marketable securities................................ -- (40,549,732) (14,368,642)
Purchases of property and equipment............................... (1,387,690) (2,693,211) (387,257)
----------- ------------ ------------
Net cash used in investing activities............................. (1,248,194) (43,242,943) (14,755,899)
----------- ------------ ------------
Cash flows from financing activities
Principal payments on note payable--Former stockholder............ (23,835) -- --
Proceeds from issuance of common stock............................ -- 66,860,251 --
Stock option and purchase plans................................... 174,057 4,449,336 1,319,699
Purchase of common stock.......................................... -- -- (14,503,799)
Sub-chapter S distributions....................................... (2,117,437) -- --
----------- ------------ ------------
Net cash provided (used in) by financing activities............... (1,967,215) 71,309,587 (13,184,100)
----------- ------------ ------------
Effect of change in exchange rates on cash........................ -- 9,088 15,218
----------- ------------ ------------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents.............. 1,093,917 38,599,853 (22,184,087)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year...................... 2,698,110 3,792,027 42,391,880
----------- ------------ ------------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year............................ $ 3,792,027 $ 42,391,880 $ 20,207,793
=========== ============ ============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
33
INFORTE CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Nature of Business
Strategic technology consultancy Inforte Corp. (Inforte) helps clients create
strategies and implement technologies that capture, manage and integrate
customer and other demand information into all aspects of the value chain,
enabling companies to become more demand driven and demand responsive. Inforte
assists clients in navigating through and succeeding in ever-changing economic
environments by putting into action business and technology strategies that
lower cost and drive revenue.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
Cash and Cash Equivalents
All highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when
purchased are considered cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalent balances
consist of obligations of U.S. banks, high-grade commercial paper and other
high quality, short-term obligations of U.S. companies. At December 31, 2000
and 2001, Inforte classified its cash equivalent investments, totaling
approximately $39.7 million and $13.3 million, respectively, as
available-for-sale. These investments are stated at amortized costs, which
approximates fair value.
Financial Instruments
Short-term and long-term marketable securities are available-for-sale
securities which are recorded at fair market value. The difference between
amortized cost and fair market value, net of tax effect, is shown as a separate
component of stockholders' equity. The cost of securities available-for-sale is
adjusted for amortization of premiums and discounts to maturity. Interest and
amortization of premiums and discounts for all securities are included in
interest income. Realized gains and losses from sales of available-for-sale
securities were not material in 2000 and $19,560 in 2001. At December 31, 2000
and 2001, unrealized gains were $125,987 and $233,708, respectively, and were
accounted for in other comprehensive income. All marketable securities are
owned by Inforte Investments Inc. which is a separate legal entity, fully owned
by Inforte Corp., set up to hold certain investment accounts for the parent
company.
Principles of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Inforte and its
fully-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts have been
eliminated.
Computers, Purchased Software, and Property
Computers, purchased software, and property are stated at cost. Inforte
provides for depreciation and amortization using the straight-line method over
their estimated useful lives as follows:
Asset Classification Estimated Useful Life
-------------------- ---------------------
Office furniture....... 3-5 years
Computers and equipment 2-3 years
Purchased software..... 2-3 years
Leasehold improvements. Estimated useful life or life of
lease (whichever is shorter)
Significant improvements are capitalized and depreciated. Upon retirement or
sale, the cost of the assets disposed of and the related accumulated
depreciation are removed from the accounts, and any resulting gain or loss is
included in the results of operations.
34
INFORTE CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Revenue Recognition
Revenues pursuant to fixed-fee contracts are generally recognized as services
are rendered on the percentage-of-completion method of accounting based on the
ratio of costs incurred to total estimated costs. The cumulative impact of any
revision in estimates of the percent complete is reflected in the period in
which the changes become known. Revenues pursuant to time-and-material
contracts are generally recognized as services are performed. Amounts billed
prior to rendering services are classified as deferred revenue. Revenues
exclude reimbursable expenses chargeable to the client.
In November 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board's Emerging Issues
Task Force issued Topic D-103, "Income Statement Characterization of
Reimbursements Received for 'Out-of-Pocket' Expenses Incurred," stating these
costs should be characterized as revenue in the income statement if billed to
customers. The Company is required to adopt this change beginning in calendar
2002 and will reclassify prior periods in the comparative consolidated
financial statements. The Company has historically treated these reimbursable
costs as rebillable invoices to the respective customer and has not included
them in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company has not yet
determined the amount of these out-of-pocket reimbursable expenses for prior
years, but estimates that these costs will approximate 10%-20% of previously
reported revenue. This pronouncement will not affect net income as revenue and
expenses will both increase by offsetting amounts.
Stock-Based Compensation
As permitted by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (''SFAS'') No. 123,
''Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,'' (SFAS 123), Inforte uses the
intrinsic value method to account for stock options as set forth in Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25, ''Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees''
(APB 25). Accordingly, no compensation cost is normally recognized under APB 25
for Inforte's stock option plans, because there is no intrinsic value at the
measurement date. There are two exceptions where compensation expense was
recorded. In 2000, compensation expense for $50,000 relates to stock options
that were granted to a member of the Board of Directors for consulting
services. In 2001, the compensation expense related to options is $1,549,000,
of which $1,374,000 was for a performance-based stock option and the remaining
$175,000 was for the aforementioned stock options granted to a member of the
Board of Directors for consulting services. The exercise price on all of these
options grants equaled fair market value of the time of grant.
Income taxes
Deferred income taxes are provided on all differences between the tax bases of
assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the consolidated financial
statements based upon enacted statutory tax rates in effect in the periods when
such differences are expected to reverse.
Earnings Per Share
Basic and diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss
available to common stockholders for the period by the weighted average number
of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. The calculation of
diluted net loss per share excludes potential common shares if the effect is
antidilutive. Potential common shares are composed of common stock issuable
upon the exercise of stock options.
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income includes net income as currently reported under accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States and also considers the
effect of additional economic events that are not required to be recorded in
determining net income but are rather reported as a separate component of
stockholders' equity. Inforte reports foreign currency translation adjustments
and unrealized gains and losses on marketable securities as components of
comprehensive income.
35
INFORTE CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Foreign Currency Translation
The functional currency of Inforte's foreign operations is the local currency.
Accordingly, all assets and liabilities are translated into United States
dollars using period-end exchange rates and all revenues and expenses are
translated using weighted average rates for the period. Translation adjustments
are accumulated as a component of stockholders' equity. Net gains and losses
resulting from foreign exchange transactions are included in the consolidated
statements of operations and are not significant during the periods presented.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Inforte's financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents,
short-term and long-term marketable securities, accounts receivable and
accounts payable. At December 31, 2000 and 2001, the fair value of these
instruments approximated their consolidated financial statement carrying
amounts.
Inforte performs periodic credit evaluations of its customers' financial
condition and generally does not require collateral. Inforte maintains an
allowance for potential credit losses, and such losses have been within
management's expectations.
For the year ended December 31, 1999, two customers accounted for 5% and 4%,
respectively, of revenue and 19% and 11%, respectively, of accounts receivable
at December 31, 1999. For the year ended December 31, 2000, one customer
accounted for 1% of revenue and 11% of accounts receivable at December 31,
2000. For the year ended December 31, 2001, two customers accounted for 9% and
1%, respectively, of revenue and 17% and 16%, respectively, of accounts
receivable at December 31, 2001.
Use of Accounting Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
Advertising Costs
Inforte expenses the cost of advertising as incurred. Such costs are included
in sales and marketing in the consolidated statements of operations. In the
years 1999, 2000 and 2001 advertising costs were immaterial.
3. Reincorporation
In 2000, Inforte's Board of Directors authorized, and stockholders approved,
the reincorporation of Inforte in the State of Delaware. Following the
reincorporation, Inforte is authorized to issue 50,000,000 shares of $0.001 par
value common stock.
36
INFORTE CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
4. Financial Instruments
The portfolio of short-term and long-term marketable securities (including cash
and cash equivalents) consisted of the following:
Year ended December 31, 2000 Year ended December 31, 2001
---------------------------------- --------------------------------------
Gross Gross
Amortized Unrealized Fair Market Amortized Unrealized Fair Market
Cost Gains Value Cost Gains (Losses) Value
----------- ---------- ----------- ----------- -------------- -----------
Cash.................... $ 2,741,023 $ -- $ 2,741,023 $ 6,860,511 $ -- $ 6,860,511
Commercial paper........ 11,862,824 -- 11,862,824 8,992,282 -- 8,992,282
Municipal notes/bonds... 29,689,043 103,870 29,792,913 23,647,797 124,445 23,772,242
Corporate bonds......... 3,389,913 22,117 3,412,030 14,712,542 87,349 14,799,891
Corporate auction
preferreds............ 35,100,084 -- 35,100,084 14,800,925 (925) 14,800,000
U.S. government agencies -- -- -- 5,869,622 22,838 5,892,460
Certificate of deposit.. 87,949 -- 87,949 -- -- --
----------- -------- ----------- ----------- -------- -----------
$82,870,836 $125,987 $82,996,823 $74,883,679 $233,707 $75,117,386
=========== ======== =========== =========== ======== ===========
Inforte considers all marketable securities with maturities of one year or less
as of December 31, 2000 or December 31, 2001 to be short term. Long-term
marketable securities consist of marketable securities with remaining
maturities greater than twelve months.
Contractual maturities of investments in debt securities (excluding commercial
paper) at December 31, 2000 and 2001:
Year ended December 31, 2000 Year ended December 31, 2001
---------------------------- ----------------------------
Amortized Fair Market Amortized Fair Market
Cost Value Cost Value
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Less than one year........... $18,799,189 $18,818,760 $25,147,991 $25,269,067
Due in 1-2 years............. 14,279,767 14,386,183 13,212,348 13,303,066
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Investment in debt securities $33,078,956 $33,204,943 $38,360,339 $38,572,133
=========== =========== =========== ===========
5. Computers, Purchased Software, and Property
Computers, purchased software and property at December 31 consist of the
following:
2000 2001
---------- ----------
Office furniture................................ $ 313,677 $ 328,126
Computers and equipment......................... 2,582,633 1,816,031
Leasehold improvements.......................... 788,382 796,524
Purchased software.............................. 850,978 835,951
---------- ----------
4,535,670 3,776,632
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization. 1,558,503 1,915,687
---------- ----------
$2,977,167 $1,860,945
========== ==========
37
INFORTE CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
6. Note Payable to Former Stockholder
The note payable to the former stockholder had an interest rate of 9.25% and
was repaid in 1999. Interest paid was $741.
7. Income Taxes and Distribution to Shareholders
Federal taxes paid were $1,306,000 and $3,470,215 in 1999 and 2000,
respectively and there were no federal taxes paid in 2001. State income taxes
paid were $258,923, $974,066 and $61,372 in 1999, 2000 and 2001, respectively.
The stockholders of Inforte terminated their S corporation election as of
January 1, 1999. During 1999, Inforte distributed $2,117,437 to former S
Corporation stockholders.
Income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000 and
2001 consists of the following:
1999 2000 2001
---------- ---------- ----------
Current:
Federal. $1,578,053 $4,348,692 $1,134,400
State... 380,667 615,564 65,431
Foreign. -- -- 100,000
---------- ---------- ----------
1,958,720 4,964,256 1,299,831
Deferred:
Federal. (541,448) (498,819) (773,465)
State... (130,611) (70,608) (23,232)
---------- ---------- ----------
(672,059) (569,427) (796,697)
---------- ---------- ----------
$1,286,661 $4,394,829 $ 503,134
========== ========== ==========
The reconciliation of income taxes computed using the federal statutory rate of
34% for the year ended December 31, 1999 and 35% for the years ended December
31, 2000 and 2001 is as follows :
(in thousands)
1999 2000 2001
------ ------ -----
Federal statutory income tax............................... $1,304 $3,944 $ 110
State income tax, net of federal tax benefit............... 176 763 122
Nondeductible expenses..................................... 61 330 165
Tax-exempt and tax-advantaged interest income.............. -- (710) (578)
Recording of net deferred tax asset due to termination of S
corporation status....................................... (254) -- --
Non-deductible compensation expense........................ -- -- 551
Effect of international taxes.............................. -- -- 100
Other...................................................... -- 67 33
------ ------ -----
$1,287 $4,394 $ 503
====== ====== =====
38
INFORTE CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to deferred tax assets
and liabilities at December 31, 2000 and 2001 are as follows:
December 31,
----------------------
2000 2001
---------- ----------
Deferred income tax assets:
Allowance for doubtful accounts...................... $ 459,425 $ 459,425
Accrued loss on lease................................ -- 442,582
Book over tax depreciation........................... 170,347 242,514
Accrued bonuses, vacation and health insurance costs. 189,152 510,315
Other................................................ 227,179 208,667
Deferred rent........................................ 240,574 219,870
---------- ----------
Gross deferred tax assets........................ 1,286,677 2,083,373
Deferred income tax liability:
Use of cash basis for income tax purposes............ (45,191) --
---------- ----------
Deferred income tax liability........................... (45,191) --
---------- ----------
Net deferred income tax asset.................... $1,241,486 $2,083,373
========== ==========
8. Net Income (Loss) per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income
(loss) per share.
Year ended December 31,
-----------------------------------
1999 2000 2001
----------- ----------- -----------
Numerator
Numerator for basic and diluted net income (loss) per common
share:
Net income (loss).................................... $ 2,549,330 $ 6,873,960 $ (191,671)
=========== =========== ===========
Pro forma net income (unaudited)..................... $ 2,293,512
===========
Denominator
Denominator for basic earnings per common share:
Weighted-average shares.................................. 8,635,537 12,050,560 12,472,070
----------- ----------- -----------
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options............................................... 2,151,441 1,450,887 --
----------- ----------- -----------
Denominator for diluted earnings per common share:
Adjusted weighted-average shares..................... 10,786,978 13,501,447 12,472,070
=========== =========== ===========
The following table sets forth common stock equivalents that are not included
in the diluted net income per share calculation above because to do so would be
antidilutive for the periods indicated:
Year ended December 31,
-----------------------
1999 2000 2001
- ---- ---- -------
Weighted average effect of common stock equivalents:
Stock options.................................... -- -- 802,244
==== ==== =======
39
INFORTE CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
9. Related Party Transactions
Transactions with related parties are entered into only upon approval by a
majority of the independent directors of Inforte and only with terms comparable
to those that would be available from unaffiliated parties.
A note receivable with recourse was executed between Inforte and one of its
stockholders in December 1998 related to the exercise of stock options. There
were no interest payments required while the note was outstanding, and the term
was indefinite as it could be repaid at any time. The note bore interest at
7.75% which was accrued annually. This note and accrued interest were repaid in
full on September 30, 1999.
At December 31, 1998, Inforte had a note receivable from a stockholder for
$33,306, classified as a reduction of stockholders' equity, which was
subsequently repaid through a distribution to the stockholder in 1999. In
October 2000, Inforte granted 62,500 options to a non-employee member of the
Board of Directors, in exchange for consulting services. The options were
granted at the fair market value of the Inforte stock on the grant date and
vest over the service period which is estimated to be three years. The options
expire at the end of ten years. These options were accounted for under SFAS
123, and the total expense to be recorded over the service period equals
$400,000, the estimated fair value of the services provided.
10. Stockholders' Equity
Stock Option and Incentive Plans
The 1995 Incentive Stock Option Plan (the ''1995 Plan'') provides for the
issuance of incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options to officers
and other key employees of Inforte. Inforte has reserved an aggregate of
4,900,000 shares for issuance under the 1995 Plan, of which 365,000 were
available for grant as of December 31, 2001. As of December 31, 2001, Inforte
does not intend to issue any additional options under the 1995 Plan.
On December 31, 1997, the stockholders approved the 1997 Incentive Compensation
Plan (the ''1997 Plan''), which permits the grant of stock options and other
stock awards to employees and directors of Inforte.
On December 1, 1999, the stockholders approved the Amended and Restated Inforte
Corp. 1997 Incentive Compensation Plan. Inforte has reserved an aggregate of
4,000,000 shares of common stock for issuance through the amended 1997 Plan,
plus annual increases beginning in 2001 equal to the lesser of: (1) 1,000,000
shares, (2) 5% of the outstanding shares, or (3) a number determined by the
Board of Directors. Of the shares of common stock available under this 1997
Plan, 1,321,713 were available for grant as of December 31, 2001. The 1997 Plan
authorizes the grant of both incentive and nonqualified stock options, and
further authorizes the grant of stock appreciation rights independently of or
with respect to options granted or outstanding. Stock options generally have
10-year terms and vest in accordance with provisions determined by the Board of
Directors. A restricted stock program, performance program and bonus shares
program have also been established under the 1997 Plan. Awards under the
restricted stock program and performance program are earned over a period of
time upon the achievement of certain performance objectives. Restricted share
grants may not be sold or otherwise disposed of until the restrictions lapse.
Performance shares are payable in cash, common stock, or a combination thereof
when earned. Bonus shares allow participants to elect to receive shares of
common stock in lieu of a portion or all of cash bonuses paid by Inforte. Stock
appreciation rights and restricted stock have not been granted to date.
40
INFORTE CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
A summary of stock option information follows:
1995 Plan 1997 Plan
-------------------- -------------------
Weighted Weighted
Average Average
Number of Exercise Number of Exercise
Shares Price Shares Price
---------- -------- --------- --------
Outstanding on December 31, 1998............................ 1,800,000 $0.06 673,900 $ 0.43
Granted..................................................... -- -- 960,375 5.35
Exercised................................................... (1,237,500) 0.03 (108,654) 1.21
Canceled.................................................... (125,000) 0.02 (34,075) 1.53
---------- ----- --------- ------
Outstanding on December 31, 1999............................ 437,500 0.16 1,491,546 3.52
Granted..................................................... -- -- 1,295,980 30.32
Exercised................................................... (200,000) 0.14 (301,367) 1.78
Canceled.................................................... -- -- (132,222) 18.12
---------- ----- --------- ------
Outstanding on December 31, 2000............................ 237,500 $0.17 2,353,937 $17.68
---------- ----- --------- ------
Granted..................................................... -- -- 1,003,418 12.22
Exercised................................................... (75,000) 0.05 (192,339) 2.51
Canceled.................................................... -- -- (453,943) 17.66
---------- ----- --------- ------
Outstanding on December 31, 2001............................ 162,500 $0.22 2,711,073 $16.73
========== ===== ========= ======
Exercisable at December 31, 2001............................ 62,500 $0.20 678,953 $17.47
Available for grant at December 31, 2001.................... 365,000 1,321,713
Weighted average fair value of options granted during twelve
months ended December 31, 2001............................ $ 7.47
1995 Plan
Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
------------------------------ --------------------
Weighted Weighted Weighted
Number Average Average Exercisable Average
of RemainingLife Exercise Options at Exercise
Range of Exercise Prices Options (in years) Price 12/31/01 Price
------------------------ ------- ------------- -------- ----------- --------
$0.05-$0.24....... 162,500 6.0 $0.22 62,500 $0.20
======= === ===== ====== =====
1997 Plan
Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
--------------------------------- --------------------
Weighted Weighted Weighted
Average Average Exercisable Average
Number of Remaining Life Exercise Options at Exercise
Range of Exercise Prices Options (in years) Price 12/31/01 Price
- ------------------------ --------- -------------- -------- ----------- --------
$0.24-$1.43....... 316,609 6.6 $ 0.82 129,578 $ 0.80
$3.50-$7.00....... 430,002 7.4 6.78 180,375 6.81
$7.01-$13.97........ 1,140,008 9.1 12.40 108,051 12.36
$13.98-$32.00...... 437,080 8.0 29.98 136,097 30.19
$32.01-$71.81...... 387,374 7.5 38.59 124,852 40.71
--------- --- ------ ------- ------
Total.......... 2,711,073 8.1 $16.73 678,953 $17.47
========= === ====== ======= ======
41
INFORTE CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
As permitted by SFAS No. 123, stock option and incentive plans are accounted
for in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations.
Generally, no compensation expense is recognized for stock options if exercise
prices equal the market value of the underlying shares of stock at the
measurement date. To date, Inforte has granted options with exercise prices
equal to market value on the grant date.
In October 2000 Inforte issued 62,500 options to a non-employee member of the
Board of Directors in exchange for consulting services as described in Note 9.
In October 2001 Inforte issued 55,000 options to non-employee members of the
Board of Directors for their services as directors.
In 2001 Inforte incurred a non-cash, non-recurring stock compensation expense
of $1,374,000 for a performance-based option with an exercise price equal to
fair market value at the time of grant. There will be no future expense from
this option. Excluding this non-cash expense, which had no effect on income tax
expense, net income would have been $1,182,329 for 2001, and basic and diluted
earnings per share would have each been $0.09.
Had all stock options and incentive plans been accounted for at fair value in
accordance with SFAS No. 123, Inforte's net income on a pro forma basis would
have been:
Year ended December 31,
---------------------------------
1999 2000 2001
---------- ---------- -----------
Net income:
As reported (pro forma for 1999)................... $2,293,512 $6,873,960 $ (191,671)
Pro forma as adjusted.............................. 2,190,451 3,998,036 (9,089,904)
Pro forma as adjusted earnings per share--diluted.. $ 0.20 $ 0.30 $ (0.73)
The fair value of stock options used to compute pro forma net income and pro
forma net income per share is the estimated present value at grant date using
the minimum value option-pricing model in 1999 and the Black Scholes option
pricing model in 2000 and 2001. The option pricing models assumptions were:
dividend yield of 0%, risk-free interest rates of 4.62%, 5.00% and 4.00% for
1999, 2000 and 2001 respectively, 80% volatility and a weighted-average
expected option life of four years.
11. Lease Commitments
At December 31, 2001, Inforte was obligated for future minimum lease payments
under operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable terms in
excess of one year, as follows:
2002............................ $ 2,284,325
2003............................ 2,363,738
2004............................ 2,443,489
2005............................ 2,455,390
2006 and thereafter............. 595,950
-----------
Total minimum lease payments. $10,142,892
===========
Rent expense for operating leases was $631,265, $1,706,267 and $3,362,463 for
the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001, respectively.
42
INFORTE CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
During 2001 Inforte took major steps to reduce its costs to better align its
overall cost structure and organization with anticipated demand for its
services. These steps included consolidating office space at the Chicago
location where Inforte had multiple contractual rental commitments. Estimated
costs for the consolidation of facilities comprise contractual rental
commitments for office space being vacated and related costs in addition to
future depreciation of the related leasehold improvements, offset by estimated
sub-lease income. The total reduction of office space resulting from these
office consolidations was approximately 17,770 square feet, all of which were
vacated as of December 31, 2001. The total charge related to this reduction of
office space in 2001 was $1,107,841. This charge, which is also included in the
2001 rent expense shown above, is a component of management and administrative
expense on the on the 2001 consolidated statement of operations, and as accrued
expenses on the balance sheet. If future sub-lease income is less than
estimated, or if we are unable to sub-lease our vacated space, additional
charges in future periods will be necessary.
12. Benefit Plan
Inforte sponsors a 401(k) savings plan covering all employees. Inforte has not
made any matching or discretionary contributions to the plan. Administrative
costs during 1999, 2000, 2001 related to this plan are not considered material.
13. Common Stock in Treasury
During 2001, Inforte repurchased 1,492,702 shares of its common stock for $14.5
million at an average price of $9.72. The board approved a $25.0 million stock
repurchase program on January 24, 2001 and as of December 31, 2001, $10.5
million remained authorized for repurchase.
14. Quarterly Financial Results (unaudited)
The following tables set forth certain unaudited quarterly results of
operations of Inforte for 2000 and 2001. The quarterly operating results are
not necessarily indicative of future results of operations.
The net loss of $1,354,914 in the fourth quarter 2001 resulted from a non-cash,
non-recurring stock compensation expense of $1,374,000 for a performance-based
option with an exercise price equal to fair market value at the time of the
grant. This option did not have any expense associated with it in the first
three quarters of 2001, nor will there be any future expense from this option.
Excluding this non-cash expense, which had no effect on income tax expense, net
income would have been $19,086 for the fourth quarter 2001 and $1,182,329 for
the full year 2001. Excluding this non-cash expense, basic and diluted earnings
per share would have each been $0.00 for the fourth quarter 2001 and $0.09 for
the full year 2001.
43
INFORTE CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Three Months Ended (unaudited)
-------------------------------------------------------
Mar. 31, 2000 Jun. 30, 2000 Sep. 30, 2000 Dec. 31, 2000
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Revenues................................... $12,290,000 $16,393,162 $17,790,784 $17,365,014
Operating expenses:
Project personnel and related expenses.. 5,408,772 7,123,510 7,910,215 7,739,504
Sales and marketing..................... 1,561,941 2,228,910 2,359,848 2,433,030
Recruiting, retention and training...... 1,406,296 2,100,327 1,731,123 1,122,595
Management and administrative........... 2,443,543 2,880,835 3,525,504 3,980,624
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total operating expenses................... 10,820,552 14,333,582 15,526,690 15,275,753
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Operating income........................... 1,469,448 2,059,580 2,264,094 2,089,261
Interest income, net, and other............ 340,501 900,979 1,053,800 1,091,126
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Income before income taxes................. 1,809,949 2,960,559 3,317,894 3,180,387
Income tax expense......................... 778,344 1,131,140 1,244,994 1,240,351
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net income (loss).......................... $ 1,031,605 $ 1,829,419 $ 2,072,900 $ 1,940,036
=========== =========== =========== ===========
Earnings per share
Diluted (1)............................. $ 0.08 $ 0.13 $ 0.15 $ 0.14
=========== =========== =========== ===========
Weighted-average common shares outstanding:
Diluted................................. 12,431,917 13,832,411 13,946,224 13,803,361
=========== =========== =========== ===========
Three Months Ended (unaudited)
------------------------------------------------------
Mar. 31, 2001 Jun. 30, 2001 Sep. 30, 2001 Dec. 31, 2001
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Revenues................................... $14,051,153 $12,537,832 $10,600,439 $10,546,182
Operating expenses:
Project personnel and related expenses.. 7,396,824 7,378,815 5,876,560 5,681,583
Sales and marketing..................... 1,858,591 2,129,456 1,804,975 1,280,368
Recruiting, retention and training...... 924,081 709,957 596,767 638,551
Management and administrative........... 3,447,453 3,098,569 3,083,137 3,577,892
Non-cash stock compensation expense..... -- -- -- 1,374,000
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total operating expenses................... 13,626,949 13,316,797 11,361,439 12,552,394
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Operating income (loss).................... 424,204 (778,965) (761,000) (2,006,212)
Interest income, net, and other............ 1,013,331 898,435 870,372 651,298
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Income (loss) before income taxes.......... 1,437,535 119,470 109,372 (1,354,914)
Income tax expense......................... 503,134 -- -- --
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net income (loss).......................... $ 934,401 $ 119,470 $ 109,372 $(1,354,914)
=========== =========== =========== ===========
Earnings per share:
Diluted (1)............................. $ 0.07 $ 0.01 $ 0.01 $ (0.12)
=========== =========== =========== ===========
Weighted-average common shares outstanding:
Diluted................................. 13,699,582 13,632,087 13,521,401 11,604,596
=========== =========== =========== ===========
- --------
(1) Sum of quarters does not equal year due to differences in average shares
outstanding.
44
INFORTE CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
15. Segment Reporting
Inforte engages in business activities in one operating segment, which provides
consulting services primarily on a fixed-price, fixed-time frame basis.
Inforte's services are delivered to clients in North America and Europe, and
Inforte's long-lived assets are located in North America and Europe. Domestic
and foreign operating revenues are based on the location of customers.
Long-lived assets consist of property, plant and equipment, software, furniture
and fixtures and leasehold improvements (net of accumulated depreciation).
During the year ended December 31, 2001, Inforte's European operations had
$5,022,922 of revenues and $27,782 of long-lived assets. In 1999 and 2000
operating revenues and long-lived assets related to foreign operations were
immaterial.
16. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds
On February 28, 2000, Inforte closed its offering of an aggregate of 2,300,000
shares of its Common Stock at an offering price of $32.00 per share. Net
proceeds to Inforte, of $66,860,251 were invested in cash and marketable
securities for general corporate use.
45
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Information concerning Inforte's directors is incorporated herein by reference
to Inforte's definitive proxy statement with respect to its 2002 annual meeting
of stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within
120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K.
Information concerning Inforte's executive officers is included in Part I of
this report under the caption ''Executive Officers of the Registrant.''
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information concerning executive compensation is incorporated herein by
reference to Inforte's definitive proxy statement with respect to its 2002
annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this
Form 10-K.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
Information concerning ownership of Inforte's stock is incorporated herein by
reference to Inforte's definitive proxy statement with respect to its 2002
annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this
Form 10-K.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Information concerning certain relationships and related transactions involving
Inforte's directors and executive officers is incorporated herein by reference
to Inforte's definitive proxy statement with respect to its 2002 annual meeting
of stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within
120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K.
46
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS
ON FORM 8-K
Financial Statements
Inforte's financial statements included in Item 8 of this report are listed in
the index preceding the financial statements.
Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K
Financial Statement Schedules
(i) Schedule II--Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.
Exhibits
3.1 Certificate of Incorporation. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3 to Inforte's Form S-1, as
amended, Registration No. 333-92325.
3.2 Amended and Restated Bylaws. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Inforte's
Form S-1, as amended, Registration No. 333-92325.
10.3(1) Amended and Restated 1995 Incentive Stock Option Plan. Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to Inforte's Form S-1, as amended, Registration No. 333-92325.
10.4(1) Amended and Restated 1997 Incentive Compensation Plan. Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to Inforte's Form S-1, as amended, Registration No. 333-92325.
10.5(1) Form of Stock Option Agreement. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Inforte's
Form S-1, as amended, Registration No. 333-92325.
10.6 Amended and Restated 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.6 to Inforte's Form S-1, as amended, Registration No. 333-92325.
10.7(1) Form of Director/Officer Indemnification Agreement. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.7 to Inforte's Form S-1, as amended, Registration No. 333-92325.
10.8 Shareholder Loan Agreement. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Inforte's Form
S-1, as amended, Registration No. 333-92325.
22.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant
23.1 Consent of Independent Auditors.
- --------
(1) Management or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed
pursuant to item 14(c) of Form 10-K.
Reports on Form 8-K
Form 8-K filed December 10, 2001 (Item 9 Regulation FD Disclosure for class
action litigation filed against Inforte)
47
SIGNATURE PAGE
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on March 20, 2002.
INFORTE CORP.
/S/ PHILIP S. BLIGH
By_________________________________
Philip S. Bligh, Chief Executive
Officer & Chairman
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature Title Date
--------- ----- ----
/S/ PHILIP S. BLIGH Chief Executive Officer & March 20, 2002
_____________________________ Chairman
Philip S. Bligh
/S/ STEPHEN C. P. MACK Chief Operating Officer, March 20, 2002
_____________________________ President & Director
Stephen C. P. Mack
/S/ NICK PADGETT Chief Financial Officer & March 20, 2002
_____________________________ Director
Nick Padgett
_____________________________ Director March 20, 2002
Edgar D. Jannotta
_____________________________ Director March 20, 2002
Ray C. Kurzweil
/S/ MICHAEL E. PORTER
_____________________________ Director March 20, 2002
MICHAEL E. PORTER
/s/ Al Ries
_____________________________ Director March 20, 2002
Al Ries
/S/ STEVEN GETTO
_____________________________ Controller March 20, 2002
Steven Getto
48
SCHEDULE II
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
INFORTE CORP.
Additions
-----------------
Charged
Balance at to Costs Charged Balance at
Beginning and to Other End of
of Period Expenses Accounts Deductions Period
---------- -------- -------- ---------- ----------
Description
Year ended December 31, 1999
Reserves and allowances deducted from asset
accounts
Allowance for doubtful accounts............. $ 275,000 $325,000 $ -- $ -- $ 600,000
Year ended December 31, 2000...................
Reserves and allowances deducted from asset
accounts
Allowance for doubtful accounts............. $ 600,000 $550,000 $ -- $ -- $1,150,000
Year ended December 31, 2001
Reserves and allowances deducted from asset
accounts
Allowance for doubtful accounts............. $1,150,000 $ -- $ -- $ -- $1,150,000
49
EXHIBIT INDEX
3.1 Certificate of Incorporation. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3 to Inforte's Form S-1, as
amended, Registration No. 333-92325.
3.2 Amended and Restated Bylaws. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Inforte's Form
S-1, as amended, Registration No. 333-92325.
10.3(1) Amended and Restated 1995 Incentive Stock Option Plan. Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to Inforte's Form S-1, as amended, Registration No. 333-92325.
10.4(1) Amended and Restated 1997 Incentive Compensation Plan. Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to Inforte's Form S-1, as amended, Registration No. 333-92325.
10.5(1) Form of Stock Option Agreement. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Inforte's Form
S-1, as amended, Registration No. 333-92325.
10.6(1) Amended and Restated 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.6 to Inforte's Form S-1, as amended, Registration No. 333-92325.
10.7(1) Form of Director/Officer Indemnification Agreement. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.7 to Inforte's Form S-1, as amended, Registration No. 333-92325.
10.8 Shareholder Loan Agreement. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Inforte's Form
S-1, as amended, Registration No. 333-92325.
22.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant
23.1 Consent of Independent Auditors.
- --------
(1) Management or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed
pursuant to item 14(c) of Form 10-K.
50