UNITED
STATES |
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 |
|
FORM 10-Q |
|
[X] |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) |
|
|
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004 |
|
[ ] |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) |
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM_______TO_______. |
||
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-25734; 1-13684 |
|
|
|
DIMON Incorporated |
|
Incorporated under the laws of |
I.R.S. Employer |
VIRGINIA |
Identification No. 54-1746567 |
512 Bridge Street, Danville, Virginia 24541 |
|
|
|
Telephone Number (434) 792-7511 |
|
|
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ] |
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Yes [X] No [ ] |
|
|
|
|
|
As of February 1, 2005, the registrant had 45,368,324 shares outstanding of Common Stock (no par value). |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
DIMON Incorporated and Subsidiaries |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
Table of Contents |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
Page No. |
|||
Part I. |
Financial Information |
||
|
|||
Item 1. |
Financial Statements |
||
|
|||
Three and Nine Months Ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 |
3 |
||
|
|||
Consolidated Balance Sheet December 31, 2004 and 2003 |
|||
and March 31, 2004 |
4 - 5 |
||
|
|||
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 |
6 |
||
|
|||
7 - 15 |
|||
|
|||
Item 2. |
|||
16 - 20 |
|||
|
|||
Item 3. |
21 |
||
|
|||
Item 4. |
22 |
||
|
|||
Part II. |
Other Information |
||
|
|||
Item 1. |
23 |
||
|
|||
Item 2. |
24 |
||
|
|||
Item 3. |
24 |
||
|
|||
Item 4. |
24 |
||
|
|||
Item 5. |
24 |
||
|
|||
Item 6. |
24 |
||
|
|||
Signatures |
25 |
||
|
|||
Index of Exhibits |
26 |
||
|
|||
-2- |
|
|||||||
DIMON
Incorporated and Subsidiaries |
|||||||
December
31, |
December 31, 2003 (Unaudited) |
March 31, 2004 |
|||||
(in thousands) |
|||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|||||||
Current liabilities |
|||||||
Notes payable to banks |
$ 235,748 |
$ 201,926 |
$ 243,655 |
||||
Accounts payable |
|||||||
Trade |
34,714 |
32,865 |
42,563 |
||||
Officers and employees |
4,257 |
4,717 |
5,028 |
||||
Other |
6,116 |
7,821 |
18,266 |
||||
Advances from customers |
110,576 |
88,152 |
77,092 |
||||
Accrued expenses |
28,383 |
26,016 |
32,878 |
||||
Income taxes |
9,653 |
9,477 |
12,412 |
||||
Long-term debt current |
3,373 |
1,380 |
2,976 |
||||
Liabilities of discontinued operations |
2,576 |
6,019 |
11,001 |
||||
Total current liabilities |
435,396 |
378,373 |
445,871 |
||||
|
|||||||
Long-term debt |
|||||||
Revolving Credit Notes and Other |
15,208 |
11,831 |
11,883 |
||||
Convertible Subordinated Debentures |
73,328 |
73,328 |
73,328 |
||||
Senior
Notes (net of fair value adjustment of |
|
|
|
||||
|
412,145 |
408,577 |
421,009 |
||||
|
|||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
|||||||
Income taxes |
5,038 |
4,314 |
4,911 |
||||
Compensation and other |
92,869 |
77,355 |
69,614 |
||||
|
97,907 |
81,669 |
74,525 |
||||
|
|||||||
Minority interest in subsidiaries |
849 |
987 |
1,114 |
||||
Commitments and contingencies |
- |
- |
- |
Stockholders equity |
Dec. 31, |
|
Dec. 31, |
|
March 31, |
|||||||
Preferred Stockno par value: |
||||||||||||
Authorized shares |
10,000 |
10,000 |
10,000 |
|||||||||
Issued shares |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||||||
Common Stockno par value: |
||||||||||||
Authorized shares |
125,000 |
125,000 |
125,000 |
|||||||||
Issued shares |
45,366 |
45,104 |
45,162 |
186,747 |
185,234 |
185,527 |
||||||
Unearned compensation restricted stock |
(1,849) |
(1,056) |
(873) |
|||||||||
Retained earnings |
243,818 |
275,599 |
236,896 |
|||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(3,342) |
(5,282) |
(6,665) |
|||||||||
425,374 |
454,495 |
414,885 |
||||||||||
$1,371,671 |
$1,324,101 |
$1,357,404 |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
-5- |
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||
Sales and other revenues | $10,304 | $3,608 | $37,228 | $28,475 | ||||
Discontinued operations: | ||||||||
Loss from operations of discontinued components | $ (284) | $ (345) | $(4,287) | $(1,344) | ||||
Loss on disposal of discontinued components | - | - | (1,432) | - | ||||
Discontinued operations, before tax | (284) | (345) | (5,719) | (1,344) | ||||
Income tax benefit | 7 | 7 | 50 | 92 | ||||
Discontinued operations, net of tax | $ (277) | $ (338) | $(5,669) | $(1,252) | ||||
December 31, | March 31, | ||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | |||||
Assets of discontinued operations: | |||||||
Trade receivables, net of allowances | $ 7,732 | $ 2,975 | $ 5,414 | ||||
Tobacco inventory and advances | 13,041 | 29,800 | 42,304 | ||||
Net property, plant and equipment | - | 9,105 | 1,953 | ||||
Other assets | 481 | 817 | 753 | ||||
Total assets of discontinued operations | $21,254 | $42,697 | $50,424 | ||||
-7- |
DIMON Incorporated and Subsidiaries | |||||||
2. | DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS (Continued) | ||||||
December 31, | March 31, | ||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | |||||
Liabilities of discontinued operations: | |||||||
Accounts payable | $ 865 | $3,157 | $ 6,707 | ||||
Advances from customers | 1,711 | 1,451 | 2,814 | ||||
Other long-term liabilities compensation and other | - | 1,076 | 1,077 | ||||
Other liabilities | - | 335 | 403 | ||||
Total liabilities of discontinued operations | $2,576 | $6,019 | $11,001 |
3. | EARNINGS PER SHARE | |
Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing earnings by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. The diluted earnings per share calculation assumes that all of the Convertible Subordinated Debentures outstanding during the periods presented were converted into Common Stock at the beginning of the reporting period thereby increasing the weighted average number of shares considered outstanding during each period and reducing the after-tax interest expense. The weighted average number of shares outstanding are further increased by common stock equivalents for employee stock options and restricted shares outstanding. | ||
For the three and nine months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the computation of diluted earnings per share did not assume the conversion of the Convertible Debentures at the beginning of the period because the inclusion would have been antidilutive. | ||
For the three months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, all outstanding restricted stock and stock options were excluded because the effect of their inclusion would have been antidilutive. For the nine months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, certain potentially dilutive options outstanding were not included in the computation of earnings per diluted share because their exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares during the period, and accordingly, their effect is antidilutive. These shares totaled 2,837 at a weighted average exercise price of $10.99 per share and 2,403 at a weighted average exercise price of $12.78 per share for the nine months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. | ||
The following information reconciles the basic weighted average number of shares outstanding to diluted shares outstanding. |
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||
Shares | ||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding | 44,918 | 44,768 | 44,879 | 44,636 | ||||
Restricted shares issued and shares applicable to stock | - | - | 547 | 653 | ||||
Effect of conversion of 6.25% Debentures at beginning of | - | - | - | - | ||||
Average diluted shares outstanding | 44,918 | 44,768 | 45,426 | 45,289 | ||||
4. | COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) |
Three Months Ended |
Nine Months Ended |
|||||||
December 31, |
December 31, |
|||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||
Net income (loss) |
$(1,864) |
$(3,019) |
$17,097 |
$16,506 |
||||
Equity currency conversion adjustment |
3,762 |
2,613 |
3,881 |
7,694 |
||||
Derivative financial
instruments, net of tax of $(55) and |
(113) |
(273) |
(557) |
1,807 |
||||
Minimum pension liability,
net of tax of $(1,111) for the |
- |
- |
- |
(1,745) |
||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
$1,785 |
$ (679) |
$20,421 |
$24,262 |
||||
-8- |
DIMON Incorporated and Subsidiaries | |
| |
5. | STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION |
| |
The Company accounts for its plans under the recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and related Interpretations. No stock-based employee compensation cost is reflected in net income as all options granted under these plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. Net income, as reported, includes compensation expense related to restricted stock. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to stock-based employee compensation. |
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||
Net income (loss), as reported | $(1,864) | $(3,019) | $17,097 | $16,506 | ||||
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense (income) included in reported net income, net of related tax effects | 49 | (78) | (194) | 92 | ||||
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects | (201) | (70) | (501) | (783) | ||||
Pro forma net income (loss) | $(2,016) | $(3,167) | $16,402 | $15,815 | ||||
Earnings (loss) per share: | ||||||||
Basic as reported | $(.04) | $(.07) | $.38 | $.37 | ||||
Basic pro forma | (.04) | (.07) | .37 | .35 | ||||
Diluted as reported | $(.04) | $(.07) | $.38 | $.36 | ||||
Diluted pro forma | (.04) | (.07) | .36 | .35 | ||||
6. | RESTRUCTURING |
| The Company conducted a strategic review during the quarter ended March 31, 2004 to evaluate its production capacity and organization relative to the major transition occurring in global sourcing of tobacco and over-capacity within certain markets of the industry. As a result, the Companys Board of Directors approved a Plan designed to improve long-term profitability. Major initiatives approved in the Plan included the closing of one of its two U.S. processing facilities and disposal of its non-strategic processing facility in Italy. The review resulted in restructuring and asset impairment charges of $29,480 at March 31, 2004 of which $27,898 related to asset impairments and other costs and $1,582 related to severance costs associated with the review for employees notified as of March 31, 2004. See Note 2 for further information. |
During the three and nine months ended December 31, 2004, additional restructuring charges were recorded of $536 and $1,977, respectively. These charges primarily relate to additional severance costs associated with the closing of one of the Companys two U.S. processing facilities. Further severance charges associated with this Plan will be incurred during fiscal 2005. Substantially all severance costs will be paid in fiscal 2005. | |
The following table summarizes the Companys severance reserves and expense: |
Employee Separation Costs |
FY 2005 Restructuring Charges |
|||
Balance March 31, 2004 |
$1,582 |
|||
Quarter Ended June 30, 2004: |
||||
Additional charges |
675 |
$ 675 |
||
Payments |
(1,341) |
|||
Balance June 30, 2004 |
$ 916 |
|||
Quarter Ended September 30, 2004: |
||||
Additional charges |
580 |
580 |
||
Payments |
(457) |
|||
Balance September 30, 2004 |
$1,039 |
|||
-9- |
| |
DIMON Incorporated and Subsidiaries | |
6. | RESTRUCTURING (Continued) |
Employee Separation Costs | FY 2005 Restructuring Charges | |||
Quarter Ended September 30, 2004: | ||||
Other Non-Cash Charges, Net | 186 | |||
Quarter Ended December 31, 2004: | ||||
Additional charges | 536 | 536 | ||
Payments | (341) | |||
Balance December 31, 2004 | $1,234 | |||
| ||||
Total December 31, 2004 | $1,977 | |||
7. |
CONTINGENCIES |
In May 2004, the Company received from Brazilian tax officials notices of proposed adjustments to income tax returns for the Companys Brazil operations for tax years 1999 through 2002, inclusive, that total $53,877 as of December 31, 2004. Of these proposed adjustments $39,083 relates to disallowance of local currency foreign exchange losses on U.S. dollar funding. The other $14,794 relates to disallowance of other sales related expenses. The Company believes it has strong defenses to these adjustments. |
|
In 1993 and 1996, the Company received notices from Brazilian tax authorities of proposed adjustments to the income tax returns of the Companys entities located in Brazil for the calendar years ending 1988 through 1992. The Company has successfully defeated many of the proposed adjustments in litigation and settled the other issues under REFIS and Tax Amnesty programs. As of December 31, 2004, total tax, penalties and interest relating to still unresolved issues is approximately $1,400. |
|
On October 31, 2002, the Company received an assessment from the tax authorities in Germany regarding the taxable gain from the sale of its flower operations, Florimex, in September 1998. The report concluded the values of the real estate located in Germany were greater than those arrived at with the buyer of the flower operation. The proposed adjustment to income tax, including interest, is equivalent to approximately $5,100 for federal corporate income tax and $2,900 for local trade income tax. The Company has challenged this finding with valuations that support the values used in the original filings and is currently discussing the issue with the tax officials in Germany. As of December 31, 2004, there has been no conclusion of this issue at the administrative level and discussions are still ongoing. It is possible, however, these issues will not be resolved at the administrative level and will be taken to tax court. The Company believes it has a strong case. |
|
In September 2002 and in January 2004, the Companys Tanzanian operation received assessments for income taxes equivalent to approximately $1,000 and $5,300, respectively. The Company has filed protests and appeals and is currently awaiting replies. |
|
In September 2004, the Companys Zimbabwe operations received a proposed assessment for withholding tax on export commissions of approximately $980. The Company expressed its objections to this proposed assessment and is challenging its merits. Discussions are ongoing and no formal assessment has been issued. |
|
The Company believes it has properly reported its income and paid its taxes in Brazil, Germany, Tanzania and Zimbabwe in accordance with applicable laws and intends to vigorously contest the proposed adjustments. The Company expects the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated balance sheet or results of operations. |
|
Since October 2001, the Directorate General for Competition (DGCOMP) of the European Commission (EC) has been conducting an administrative investigation into certain tobacco buying and selling practices alleged to have occurred within the leaf tobacco industry in Spain and Italy. The Company believes that the DGCOMP may be conducting similar investigations in other countries. Its subsidiaries in Spain (Agroexpansion) and Italy (DIMON Italia) have cooperated with the DGCOMP. The EC issued separate Statements of Objections (the Statements) relating to buying practices in Spain and Italy. The Statements allege that the buying practices of the tobacco processors and producers in Spain and Italy constitute infringements of EC competition laws. Both Agroexpansion and DIMON Italia filed a response to the Statements of Objections relating to Spain and Italy, respectively, and the EC conducted separate oral hearings on the Spanish and Italian matters. On October 20, 2004, the DGCOMP notified the Company that it and Agroexpansion have been assessed a fine in the amount of euro 2,592 (US$3,250) which was accrued in selling, general and administrative expenses at September 30, 2004. Several tobacco processors, growers, and agricultural associations that were the subject |
|
|
|
-10- |
DIMON Incorporated and Subsidiaries | |
| |
7. | CONTINGENCIES (Continued) |
of the investigation in Spain were assessed fines in various amounts totaling euro 20,000 (US$25,100). The fines were reduced as a result of the tobacco processors, including Agroexpansion's, cooperation in the DGCOMP investigation. Both the Company and Agroexpansion are currently appealing this determination and related fine. The EC investigation with respect to Spain and potentially other countries is ongoing. Based on its understanding of the facts and the activities of DIMON Italia, the Company believes there have been infringements of EC law, penalties could be assessed and such penalties could be material. The Company believes that the cooperation of its subsidiary, DIMON Italia, could result in a reduction of any penalties imposed with respect to Italy. | |
In March 2004, the Company discovered potential irregularities with respect to certain bank accounts in southern Europe and central Asia. The Audit Committee of the Companys Board of Directors engaged an outside law firm to conduct an investigation of activity relating to these accounts. That investigation revealed that, although the amounts involved were not material and had no material impact on the Companys historical financial statements, there have been payments from these accounts that may have violated the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The Company voluntarily reported the payments to the appropriate U.S. authorities. In July 2004, the Company closed the accounts in question and implemented personnel changes and other measures designed to prevent similar situations in the future, including the addition of new finance and internal audit staff in Europe and enhancement of existing training programs. | |
| If the U.S. authorities determine that there have been violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, they may seek to impose sanctions on the Company that may include injunctive relief, disgorgement, fines, penalties and modifications to business practices. It is not possible to predict at this time whether the authorities will determine that violations have occurred, and if they do, what sanctions they might seek to impose. It is also not possible to predict how the governments investigation or any resulting sanctions may impact the Companys business, results of operations or financial performance, although any monetary penalty assessed may be material to its results of operations in the quarter in which it is imposed. The Company will continue to cooperate with the authorities in these matters. |
The Company and certain of its foreign subsidiaries guarantee bank loans to growers to finance their crop. Under longer-term arrangements, the Company may also guarantee financing on growers construction of curing barns or other tobacco production assets. The Company also guarantees bank loans to certain tobacco cooperatives to assist with the financing of their growers crops. Guaranteed loans are generally repaid concurrent with the delivery of tobacco to the Company. The Company is obligated to repay any guaranteed loan should the grower or tobacco cooperative default. If default occurs, the Company has recourse against the grower or cooperative. At December 31, 2004, the Company is guarantor of an amount not to exceed $216,793 with $203,885 outstanding under these guar antees. The majority of the current outstanding guarantees expire within the respective annual crop cycle. The Company considers the risk of significant loss under these guarantees and other contingencies to be remote, and the accrual recorded for exposure under them was not material at December 31, 2004. | |
On August 21, 2001, the Companys subsidiary in Brazil won a claim related to certain excise taxes (IPI credit bonus) for the years 1983 through 1990 and is now pursuing collection. The collection procedures are not clear and the total realization process could potentially take many years. In the interim, as of December 31, 2004, the Company has utilized $21,710 of IPI credit bonus in lieu of cash payments for Brazilian federal income and other taxes. No benefit for this IPI credit bonus has been recognized because the Company is unable to predict whether the Brazilian Government will require payment of amounts offset. | |
Zimbabwe remains in a period of civil unrest in combination with a deteriorating economy. Should the current political situation continue, the Company could experience disruptions and delays associated with its Zimbabwe operations. If the political situation in Zimbabwe continues to deteriorate, the Companys ability to recover its assets there could be impaired. The Companys Zimbabwe subsidiary has long-lived assets of approximately $36,704 as of December 31, 2004. | |
8. | ISSUANCE OF SENIOR NOTES AND BANK CREDIT FACILITY |
| |
On May 30, 2003, the Company issued $125,000 principal amount of 7 ¾% Senior Notes (the 7 ¾% Notes) due 2013, and issued a redemption notice for all $125,000 of the outstanding 8 7/8% Senior Notes due 2006. The financial covenants of the 7 ¾% Notes due 2013, are substantially similar to those for the other existing Senior Notes, including restrictions on certain payments. Concurrent with the completion of the 7 ¾% Senior Note issuance, the Company entered into a derivative financial instrument to swap the entire $125,000 notional amount to a floating interest rate equal to LIBOR plus 3.69%, set six months in arrears. The effective rate at December 31, 2004 was 6.47%. The 8 7/8% Senior Notes due 2006, were fully redeemed at June 30, 2003 at a price equal to the principal amount thereof plus 1.5%. | |
On October 27, 2003, the Company completed a new three-year $150,000 syndicated bank credit facility with a group of seven banks. The credit facility is subject to certain commitment fees and covenants that, among other things, require the Company to maintain minimum working capital and tangible net worth amounts, require specific liquidity and long-term solvency ratios, including certain borrowing base restrictions, and restrict acquisitions. The Company continuously monitors its compliance with these covenants. On November 2, 2004, the Company obtained an amendment to the credit facility to eliminate the effect of any fines assessed, up to a maximum of $10,000, on it in connection with | |
-11- |
| |
DIMON Incorporated and Subsidiaries | |
| |
8. | ISSUANCE OF SENIOR NOTES AND BANK CREDIT FACILITY (Continued) |
the DGCOMP administrative investigation (disclosed in Note 7) when calculating its compliance with certain financial covenants. The credit facilitys initial term expires on October 26, 2006, and, subject to approval by the lenders, may be extended. The rates of interest are based on our published credit rating and vary according to the type of loan requested by the Company. During the life of the agreement, the interest rate could be the prime rate or the LIBOR rate adjusted. The primary advance rate is the agent banks base lending rate, 5.25% at December 31, 2004. The Company pays a commitment fee of 1% per annum on any unused portion of the facility. The new facility replaced a $165,000 facility. | |
9. | WAIVER AND AMENDMENT RELATING TO SENIOR NOTES |
On November 1, 2004, the Company obtained consents from the holders of its $200,000 9 5/8% Senior Notes due 2011 and its $125,000 7 3/4% Senior Notes due 2013 (collectively, the Notes) to a waiver of certain defaults under the related indentures. At the same time, the Company amended the indentures pursuant to which the Notes were issued to (1) confirm the Companys ability to pay dividends to holders of its common stock not to exceed $3,525 (which is approximately the current rate) in any fiscal quarter ending on or prior to June 30, 2005 and (2) make additional investments in non-wholly-owned subsidiaries prior to December 31, 2005 in an aggregate amount not to exceed $2,000. In exchange for the consents and the amendment, the Company paid holders of Notes that consented prior to the expiration of the consent solicitation a fee of $35 per $1,0 00 in principal amount of such holders Notes (or approximately $11,214 in the aggregate). This amount was capitalized and is being amortized into interest expense over the remaining lives of the Notes. | |
The defaults that are the subject of the waiver related to the Companys determination of amounts available to make certain Restricted Payments under the indentures. The payments in question were four dividend payments on the Companys common stock made between December 2003 and September 2004 (totaling approximately $13,500) and investments in a majority-owned subsidiary during the same period (totaling approximately $8,700). The Company had interpreted the indentures to permit it to pay common stock dividends and make investments in this subsidiary provided that there was sufficient availability in the Restricted Payments basket described in the indentures and that it was able to incur additional indebtedness under various permitted indebtedness baskets de scribed in the indentures. The Company subsequently determined that the indentures prohibit these Restricted Payments if a more stringent consolidated interest coverage test is not satisfied. Dividends in excess of $3,525 in any fiscal quarter or after June 30, 2005 and investments in non-wholly-owned subsidiaries in excess of $2,000 or after December 31, 2005 will remain conditioned on the Companys ability to meet the consolidated interest coverage ratio test in its indentures. The Company also obtained waivers of cross defaults under its $150,000 credit facility and eight of its subsidiaries operating lines of credit. Those defaults occurred solely as a result of the defaults under the indentures. | |
10. | DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS |
| |
Fixed to Floating Rate Interest Swaps | |
Concurrent with the issuance of $200,000 principal amount of 9 5/8% Senior Notes due 2011, on October 30, 2001, and $125,000 principal amount of 7 ¾% Senior Notes due 2013, on May 30, 2003, the Company entered into derivative financial instruments to swap the entire notional amounts of the Senior Notes to floating interest rates equal to LIBOR plus 4.25% and 3.69%, respectively, set six months in arrears. The effective interest rates at December 31, 2004 were 7.03% and 6.47% for the $200,000 and $125,000 issuances, respectively. | |
The maturity, payment dates, and other fundamental terms of these derivative financial instruments match those of the related Senior Notes. In accordance with SFAS No. 133, these derivatives qualify for hedge accounting treatment. They are accounted for as fair value hedges. Changes in the fair value of these derivative financial instruments, as well as offsetting changes in the fair value of the Senior Notes, are being recognized in current period earnings. As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, the fair value of the debt decreased the Senior Notes liability by $1,391 and $1,582, respectively, and increased the Senior Notes liability by $10,798 at March 31, 2004, with a corresponding change in the fair value of the derivative financial instruments reflected in Other Long-Term Liabilities Compensation and Other. | |
Floating to Fixed Rate Interest Swaps | |
Prior to the implementation of SFAS No. 133, the Company entered into multiple interest swaps to convert a portion of its worldwide debt portfolio from floating to fixed interest rates to reduce its exposure to interest rate volatility. At December 31, 2004, the Company held instruments of this type with an aggregate notional value of $245,000 bearing interest at rates between 4.985% and 6.22%, and with maturity dates ranging from August 23, 2005 to September 21, 2008. The implementation of SFAS No. 133 eliminated hedge accounting treatment for these instruments because they do not meet certain criteria. Accordingly, the Company is required to reflect the full amount of all changes in their fair value, without offset, in its current earnings. These fair value adjustments have caused substantial volatility in the Companys reported earnings. &nbs p;In part to mitigate this volatility, the Company entered into a mirror swap effective April 1, 2004 with a notional amount of $100,000 and a June 1, 2006 maturity exactly matching that of a swap with a | |
-12- |
|
|
DIMON Incorporated and Subsidiaries |
|
10. |
DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (Continued) |
Floating to Fixed Rate Interest Swaps (Continued) |
|
$125,000 notional value included in the aforementioned portfolio. This is a fixed-to-floating rate swap, which is expected to have periodic fair value adjustments that exactly offset those for the swap that it mirrors. Under the terms of the mirror swap, the Company receives interest at 2.285% and pays interest at six month LIBOR. For the three months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company recognized non-cash income before income taxes of $3,076 and $3,788, respectively, from the change in fair value of these derivative financial instruments. For the nine months ended December 31, 2004, and 2003, the Company recognized non-cash income before income taxes of $9,671 and $5,626, respectively, from the change in fair value of these derivative financial instruments. With the recognition of each income or expense relating to these instruments, a corresponding amount is recognized in Other Long-Term Liabilities Compensation and Other. At December 31, 2004, there was an aggregate credit of $11,691 relating to these instruments accumulated in this balance sheet classification, all of which will reverse through future earnings over the remaining life of the instruments. |
|
Forward Currency Contracts |
|
The Company periodically enters into forward currency contracts to protect against volatility associated with certain non-U.S. dollar denominated forecasted transactions. In accordance with SFAS No. 133, these derivatives qualify for hedge accounting treatment. They are accounted for as cash flow hedges. Changes in the fair value of these derivative financial instruments, net of deferred taxes, are recognized in Other Comprehensive Income and are included in earnings in the period in which earnings are affected by the hedged item. |
|
Fair Value of Derivative Financial Instruments |
|
In accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, the Company recognizes all derivative financial instruments, such as interest rate swap contracts and foreign exchange contracts, at fair value regardless of the purpose or intent for holding the instrument. Changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments are either recognized periodically in income or in stockholders equity as a component of comprehensive income depending on whether the derivative financial instrument qualifies for hedge accounting, and if so, whether it qualifies as a fair value hedge or cash flow hedge. Changes in fair values of derivatives accounted for as fair value hedges are recorded in income along with the portions of the changes in the fair values of the hedged items that relate to the hedged risk(s). Changes in fair values of derivatives accounted for as cash flow hedges, to the extent they are effective as hedges, are recorded in other comprehensive income net of deferred taxes. Changes in fair values of derivatives not qualifying as hedges are reported in income. |
|
The fair value estimates presented herein are based on quoted market prices. During the three months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, accumulated other comprehensive income decreased by $113, net of deferred taxes of $55 and $273, net of deferred taxes of $129, respectively, due to the reclassification into earnings, primarily as cost of goods and services sold, as transactions were fulfilled. For the nine months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, accumulated other comprehensive income decreased by $557, net of deferred tax of $285 and increased by $94, net of deferred tax of $61, respectively, due to the reclassification into earnings, primarily as cost of goods and services sold, as transactions were fulfilled. The remaining $1,713, net of tax of $843, for the nine months ended December 31, 2003 was due to the issuance of new cash flow hedges during the quarter. |
|
11. |
PENSION AND POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS |
In December 2003, the FASB issued a revised SFAS No. 132, Employers Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits which requires new interim disclosures relating to net periodic benefit cost and employer contributions to benefit plans. |
|
Retirement Benefits |
|
The Company has a Cash Balance Plan that provides retirement benefits for substantially all U.S. salaried personnel based on years of service rendered, age and compensation. The Company also maintains various other Excess Benefit and Supplemental Plans that provide additional benefits to (1) certain individuals whose compensation and the resulting benefits that would have actually been paid are limited by regulations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code and (2) certain individuals in key positions. The Company funds these plans in amounts consistent with the funding requirements of Federal Law and Regulations. |
|
Additional non-U.S. plans sponsored by certain subsidiaries cover substantially all of the full-time employees located in Germany, Greece and Turkey. |
|
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost |
|
Net periodic pension cost for continuing operations consisted of the following: |
|
-13- |
| |
DIMON Incorporated and Subsidiaries | |
11. | PENSION AND POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS (Continued) |
Three Months Ended December 31, | Nine Months Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||
Service cost | $ 754 | $ 775 | $2,271 | $2,156 | ||||||||||
Interest expense | 1,060 | 1,074 | 3,187 | 3,206 | ||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (679) | (630) | (2,037) | (2,020) | ||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost | 81 | 82 | 243 | 238 | ||||||||||
Amortization of transition amount | - | - | - | (63) | ||||||||||
Effect of settlement/curtailment costs | (32) | - | (32) | 11 | ||||||||||
Actuarial loss | 190 | 253 | 576 | 568 | ||||||||||
Net periodic pension cost | $1,374 | $1,554 | $4,208 | $4,096 |
Employer Contributions | |
The Companys investment objectives are to generate consistent total investment return to pay anticipated plan benefits, while minimizing long-term costs. Financial objectives underlying this policy include maintaining plan contributions at a reasonable level relative to benefits provided and assuring that unfunded obligations do not grow to a level to adversely affect the Companys financial health. As of December 31, 2004, contributions of $585 were made to its pension plans for fiscal 2005. No additional contributions to its pension plans are expected during the rest of fiscal 2005. However, this is subject to change, due primarily to asset performance significantly above or below the assumed long-term rate of return on pension assets and significant changes in interest rates. | |
Postretirement Health and Life Insurance Benefits | |
The Company also provides certain health and life insurance benefits to retired U.S. employees, and their eligible dependents, who meet specified age and service requirements. Plan assets consist of paid-up life insurance policies on certain retirees. The Company retains the right, subject to existing agreements, to modify or eliminate the medical benefits. | |
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost | |
Net periodic pension cost consisted of the following: |
Three Months Ended December 31, | Nine Months Ended December 31, | ||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||
Service cost | $120 | $112 | $ 358 | $ 309 | |||
Interest expense | 336 | 335 | 1,010 | 1,009 | |||
Expected return on plan assets | - | (2) | (2) | (5) | |||
Amortization of prior service cost | (77) | (77) | (231) | (231) | |||
Actuarial loss | 103 | 105 | 309 | 258 | |||
Net periodic pension cost | $482 | $473 | $1,444 | $1,340 |
12. | INCOME TAXES |
The effective tax rate used for the nine months ended December 31, 2004 was 30.8% compared to 31.1% at December 31, 2003. The rate is based on the current estimate of full year results except for any taxes related to specific events which are recorded in the interim period in which they occur. The Company continuously updates its estimates and forecasts of tax expense and adjusts the effective tax rate accordingly. During the quarter ended December 31, 2004, adjustments of $775 related to prior year income taxes were recorded as specific events. The net effect on the tax provision was to increase the year to date effective tax rate from 30.8% to 33%. | |
In October 2004, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Act) was signed into law by the President of the United States. The Act includes numerous U.S. tax code changes including the phase-out of extra-territorial income tax provisions, the establishment of a deduction for qualified domestic production activities and a temporary incentive for U.S. multi-national companies to repatriate accumulated income earned in controlled foreign corporations. The Act provides for a temporary 85% dividends received deduction on certain foreign earnings repatriated in our current or subsequent fiscal year. The deduction would result in an approximate 5.25% federal tax on a portion of the foreign earnings repatriated. State, local and foreign taxes could apply as well. To qualify for this federal tax deduction, the earning s must be reinvested in the United States pursuant to a domestic reinvestment plan established by a companys | |
-14- |
DIMON Incorporated and Subsidiaries |
|
12. |
INCOME TAXES (Continued) |
chief executive officer and approved by the companys board of directors. Certain other criteria in the Act must be satisfied as well. The Company is currently studying the impact of the Act, including the favorable foreign earnings repatriation provisions. The Company does not anticipate, at this time, that it will utilize the foreign earnings repatriation provision of the Act. |
|
13. |
EXTRAORDINARY ITEM |
On May 1, 2003, the Company received $2,734 from the United Nations Compensation Commission in connection with a claim filed by a predecessor company, Monk-Austin, Incorporated. The claim arose from an uncollected trade receivable from the Iraqi Tobacco Monopoly, which related to transactions that occurred prior to Iraqs invasion of Kuwait in August 1990. The predecessor company charged off the entire receivable, net of tax, as a $5,202 extraordinary loss during its fiscal year 1991. The extraordinary gain of $1,777 is recorded net of tax of $957. |
|
14. |
MERGER |
On November 7, 2004, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization (the Merger Agreement) with Standard Commercial Corporation, a North Carolina corporation (Standard Commercial) providing for the merger of Standard Commercial with and into DIMON. The closing of the merger remains subject to financing considerations and customary closing conditions, including approval by the shareholders of each of DIMON and Standard Commercial and approval of certain non-US antitrust authorities. |
|
15. |
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS |
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151 Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4. The amendments made by Statement 151 clarify that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted materials (spoilage) should be recognized as current-period charges and require the allocation of fixed production overheads to inventory based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. The guidance is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. Earlier application is permitted for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after November 23, 2004. While the Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 151 to have a material impact on the Companys financial position or results of operations, the impact is still under evaluation. |
|
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment. SFAS No. 123(R) will provide investors and other users of financial statements with more complete and neutral financial information by requiring that the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in financial statements. That cost will be measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. SFAS No. 123(R) covers a wide range of share-based compensation arrangements including share options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans. SFAS No. 123(R) replaces SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. SFAS No. 123, as originally issued in 1995, established as preferable a fair-value-based method of accounting for share-based payment transactions with employees. However, that Statement permitted entities the option of continuing to apply the guidance in Opinion 25, as long as the footnotes to financial statements disclosed what net income would have been had the preferable fair-value-based method been used. Public entities will be required to apply SFAS No. 123(R) as of the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. The Company anticipates implementing this new standard by July 1, 2005. The impact of this new standard, if it had been in effect, on the results of operations and related per share amounts for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2004 is disclosed in Note 5. |
|
-15- |
| As of | |||||||
|
|
| December 31 | March 31 | ||||
(in millions except for current ratio) |
|
|
| 2004 | 2003 | 2004 | ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
| $ 25.1 | $ 60.1 | $ 18.8 | ||
Net trade receivables |
|
|
| 179.0 | 135.7 | 192.7 | ||
Inventories and advances on purchases of tobacco |
|
|
| 585.1 | 550.7 | 556.6 | ||
Total current assets |
|
|
| 857.1 | 834.8 | 865.6 | ||
Notes payable to banks |
|
|
| 235.7 | 201.9 | 243.7 | ||
Accounts payable |
|
|
| 45.1 | 45.4 | 65.9 | ||
Total current liabilities |
|
|
| 435.4 | 378.4 | 445.9 | ||
Current ratio |
|
|
| 2.0 to 1 | 2.2 to 1 | 1.9 to 1 | ||
Working capital | 421.7 | 456.4 | 419.7 | |||||
Revolving credit notes and other long-term debt |
|
|
| 15.2 | 11.8 | 11.9 | ||
Convertible subordinated debentures |
|
|
| 73.3 | 73.3 | 73.3 | ||
Senior notes |
|
|
| 323.6 | 323.4 | 335.8 | ||
Stockholders equity |
|
|
| 425.4 | 454.5 | 414.9 |
Selected cash flow information: |
|
|
| Nine Months Ended December 31, | |
|
|
|
| 2004 | 2003 |
Purchase of property and equipment |
|
|
| $11.7 | $28.9 |
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment | 7.9 | 1.2 | |||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
| 25.9 | 26.9 |
The purchasing and processing activities of our business are seasonal. Our need for capital fluctuates and, at any one of several seasonal peaks, our outstanding indebtedness may be significantly greater or less than at year-end. We historically have needed capital in excess of cash flow from operations to finance inventory and accounts receivable. We also pre-finance tobacco crops in numerous foreign countries, including Argentina, Brazil, Greece, Guatemala, Malawi, Mexico, Mozambique, Tanzania, Turkey, Zambia and Zimbabwe. |
Our working capital increased from $419.7 million at March 31, 2004 to $421.7 million at December 31, 2004. Our current ratio was 2.0 to 1 at December 31, 2004 compared to 1.9 to 1 at March 31, 2004. Our current ratio increase results from a current asset decrease of $8.5 million and a current liability decrease of $10.5 million. Decreases in current assets relate to $13.7 million in trade receivables and $29.2 million in assets of discontinued operations partially offset by an increase of $28.5 million in inventories and advances on purchases of tobacco and a $6.3 million increase in cash. Increases in inventory relate primarily to new crop purchases in the United States and Africa. Current liabilities decreased due to an $7.9 million decrease in notes payable to banks, a $20.8 million decrease in accounts payable, an $8.4 milli on decrease in liabilities of discontinued operations, a $4.5 million decrease in accrued expenses and a $2.8 million decrease in income taxes payable partially offset by a $33.5 million increase in advances from customers. Increases in advances from customers are related to seasonal crop cycles in the United States and Africa. Decreases in accounts payable relate primarily to the seasonal purchasing cycles in Brazil and Europe. |
Net cash provided by operating activities was $54.1 million in 2004 compared to $50.5 million in 2003. Increases in cash were primarily due to $19.8 million less cash used for inventories and advances on purchases of tobacco, cash provided from operating activities of discontinued operations of $17.2 million, $18.2 million due to changes in taxes, $6.0 million used in 2003 in settlement of the DeLoach case and $4.4 million related to losses of discontinued operations. The increases were substantially offset by $43.8 million less cash provided by accounts receivable, $10.2 million more cash used for prepaid expenses and changes of $7.3 million in deferred taxes and other items. The decreased usage related to inventories and advances relates primarily to reductions in the United States. The lower provision of cash by accounts recei vable is related to decreased sales in 2004. The cash used by prepaid expenses is primarily due to higher levels of prepaid taxes on local sales in Brazil. |
Net cash used by investing activities was $8.8 million in 2004 compared to $31.5 million in 2003. The decrease in cash used for investing activities is primarily due to $17.2 million lower purchases of property and equipment, $6.7 million more cash provided from sales of property and equipment and $5.0 million used in 2003 to purchase a 25% interest in a non-tobacco company in North Carolina, partially offset by $8.1 million long term tobacco supply related advances in the current period. |
-16- |
DIMON Incorporated and Subsidiaries |
|
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES: (Continued) |
Net cash used by financing activities was $37.1 million in 2004 compared to net cash provided of $20.0 million in 2003. This decrease is primarily due to $56.8 million less cash provided by short term borrowings offset by $8.0 million more cash provided by net long-term borrowings. The change was also negatively impacted by $7.9 million more cash used for consent and waivers relating to our debt covenant and cross defaults. |
At December 31, 2004 we had seasonally adjusted lines of credit of $512.0 million of which $235.7 million was outstanding with a weighted average interest rate of 3.71%. Unused short-term lines of credit amounted to $243.2 million. At December 31, 2004 we had $31.9 million of letters of credit outstanding and an additional $1.1 million of letters of credit lines available. Total maximum borrowings, excluding the long term credit agreements, during the quarter were $387.3 million. |
Cash dividends paid to stockholders during the quarter were $0.075 per common share. |
On October 30, 2001, we issued $200 million principal amount of 9 5/8% Senior Notes due 2011. The proceeds of this Note issuance were used to repay certain existing indebtedness, including all amounts drawn under our $250 million syndicated credit facility then existing. Concurrent with the completion of the Note issuance, we entered into a derivative financial instrument to swap the entire $200 million notional amount to a floating interest rate equal to LIBOR plus 4.25%, set six months in arrears. The effective rate at December 31, 2004 was 7.03%. |
On May 30, 2003, we issued $125 million principal amount of 7 3/4% Senior Notes due 2013. The proceeds of this Note issuance were used to redeem in full $125 million of our outstanding 8 7/8% Senior Notes due 2006. Concurrent with the completion of the Note issuance, we entered into a derivative financial instrument to swap the entire $125 million notional amount to a floating interest rate equal to LIBOR plus 3.69%, set six months in arrears. The effective rate at December 31, 2004 was 6.47%. The existing 8 7/8% Senior Notes due 2006 were fully redeemed at June 30, 2003. |
On October 27, 2003, we completed a new three-year $150 million syndicated bank credit facility with a group of seven banks. The credit facility is subject to certain commitment fees and covenants that, among other things, require us to maintain minimum working capital and tangible net worth amounts, require specific liquidity and long-term solvency ratios, including certain borrowing base restrictions, and restrict acquisitions. We continuously monitor our compliance with these covenants. On November 2, 2004, we obtained an amendment to the credit facility to eliminate the effect of any fines assessed, up to a maximum of $10 million, on us in connection with the DGCOMP administrative investigation (disclosed in Note 7) when calculating our compliance with certain financial covenants. The credit facilitys initial term expires on October 26, 2006, and, subject to approval by the lenders, may be extended. The rates of interest are based on our published credit rating and vary according to the type of loan we request. During the life of the agreement, the interest rate could be the prime rate or the LIBOR rate adjusted. The primary advance rate is the agent banks base lending rate, 5.25% at December 31, 2004. We pay a commitment fee of 1% per annum on any unused portion of the facility. The new facility replaced a $165 million facility. |
On November 1, 2004, we obtained consents from the holders of our $200 million 9 5/8% Senior Notes due 2011 and our $125 million 7 3/4% Senior Notes due 2013 (collectively, the Notes) to a waiver of certain defaults under the related indentures. At the same time, we amended the indentures pursuant to which the Notes were issued to (1) confirm our ability to pay dividends to holders of our common stock not to exceed $3.5 million (which is approximately the current rate) in any fiscal quarter ending on or prior to June 30, 2005 and (2) make additional investments in non-wholly-owned subsidiaries prior to December 31, 2005 in an aggregate amount not to exceed $2 million. In exchange for the consents and the amendment, we paid holders of Notes that consented prior to the expiration of the consent solicitation a fee of $35.00 per $1,000 in principal amount of such holders Notes (or approximately $11.2 million in the aggregate). This amount was capitalized and is being amortized into interest expense over the remaining lives of the Notes. |
The defaults that are the subject of the waiver related to our determination of amounts available to make certain Restricted Payments under the indentures. The payments in question were four dividend payments on our common stock made between December 2003 and September 2004 (totaling approximately $13.5 million) and investments in a majority-owned subsidiary during the same period (totaling approximately $8.7 million). We had interpreted the indentures to permit us to pay common stock dividends and make investments in this subsidiary provided that there was sufficient availability in the Restricted Payments basket described in the indentures and that we were able to incur additional indebtedness under various permitted indebtedness baskets described in the indentures. We subsequently determined that the indentures prohibit these Restricted Payments if a more stringent consolidated interest coverage test is not satisfied. Dividends in excess of $3.5 million in any fiscal quarter or after June 30, 2005 and investments in non-wholly-owned subsidiaries in excess of $2 million or after December 31, 2005 will remain conditioned on our ability to meet the consolidated interest coverage ratio test in our indentures. We also obtained waivers of cross defaults under our $150 million credit facility and eight of our subsidiaries operating lines of credit. Those defaults occurred solely as a result of the defaults under the indentures. |
We have historically financed our operations through a combination of short-term lines of credit, revolving credit arrangements, long-term debt securities, customer advances and cash from operations. At December 31, 2004, we had no material capital expenditure commitments. We believe that these sources of funds will be sufficient to fund our anticipated needs for fiscal year 2005. There can be no assurance, however, that these sources of capital will be available in the future or, if available, that any such sources will be available on favorable terms. |
-17- |
DIMON Incorporated and Subsidiaries |
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS: |
Condensed Statement of Consolidated Income |
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | ||||||
December 31, | December 31, | ||||||
(in millions) | 2004 | Increase/ (Decrease) | 2003 | 2004 | Increase/ (Decrease) | 2003 | |
Sales and other operating revenues | $366.4 | $81.8 | $284.6 | $992.2 | $145.0 | $847.2 | |
Gross profit | 39.3 | 9.2 | 30.1 | 148.3 | 7.9 | 140.4 | |
Selling, administrative and general expenses | 32.0 | 3.0 | 29.0 | 92.3 | (.9) | 93.2 | |
Other income | (.6) | (.6) | - | (5.2) | (5.2) | - | |
Restructuring and asset impairment charges | .5 | .5 | - | 2.0 | 2.0 | - | |
Interest expense | 13.1 | 2.0 | 11.1 | 38.0 | 3.6 | 34.4 | |
Interest income | .5 | (2.6) | 3.1 | 2.4 | (2.0) | 4.4 | |
Derivative financial instruments (income)/expense | (3.1) | .7 | (3.8) | (9.7) | (4.1) | (5.6) | |
Income taxes (benefit)/ expense | (.7) | .2 | (.9) | 11.0 | 3.9 | 7.1 | |
Equity in net income (loss) of investee companies | - | .2 | (.2) | .1 | - | .1 | |
Minority interests (income) | .1 | (.2) | .3 | (.3) | (.1) | (.2) | |
Loss from discontinued operations | (.3) | - | (.3) | (5.7) | (4.4) | (1.3) | |
Extraordinary item Iraqi receivable recovery, net of $1.0 income tax | - | - | - | - | (1.8) | 1.8 | |
Net Income (Loss) | $ (1.9)* | $ 1.1* | $ (3.0) | $ 17.1* | $ .6* | $ 16.5 | |
| |||||||
*Amounts do not equal column totals due to rounding. | |||||||
Sales and Other Operating Revenue Supplemental Information |
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | ||||||
December 31, | December 31, | ||||||
(in millions, except per kilo amounts) | 2004 | Increase/ (Decrease) | 2003 | 2004 | Increase/ (Decrease) | 2003 | |
Tobacco sales and other operating revenues: | |||||||
Sales and other operating revenues | $348.4 | $84.5 | $263.9 | $969.5 | $149.6 | $819.9 | |
Kilos | 111.3 | 23.3 | 88.0 | 320.2 | 28.6 | 291.6 | |
Average price per kilo | $ 3.13 | $ .13 | $ 3.00 | $ 3.03 | $ .22 | $ 2.81 | |
Processing and other revenues | $ 18.0 | $(2.7) | $ 20.7 | $ 22.7 | $ (4.6) | $ 27. 3 | |
Total sales and other operating revenues | $366.4 | $81.8 | $284.6 | $992.2 | $145.0 | $847.2 | |
| |||||||
Three Months Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to Three Months Ended December 31, 2003 | |||||||
| |||||||
Sales and other operating revenues increased 28.7% from $284.6 million in 2003 to $366.4 million in 2004. The $81.8 million increase is the result of a 26.5% or 23.3 million kilo increase in quantities sold and a 4.3% or $0.13 per kilo increase in average sales prices. Sales increases of $90.8 million in non-U.S. tobacco were partially offset by decreases of $6.3 million in U.S. tobacco and $2.7 million in processing and service revenues. Sales of non-U.S. tobacco increased 25.1 million kilos or $64.5 million primarily due to larger current year crop sales from Brazil, Argentina, Tanzania and Malawi. Sales also increased in Europe due to sales of prior crop Bulgarian tobaccos and sales of Turkish and Greek oriental tobaccos delayed from earlier quarters. These increases were partially offset by decreased sales of Asian tobaccos primarily due to early shipments in previo us quarters in China and reduced demand in Thailand. Prices of non-U.S. tobacco increased $0.26 per kilo resulting in a sales increase of $26.3 million. Price changes are primarily due to changes in product mix as a result of higher priced tobacco from Europe. The decrease in sales of U.S. tobacco relates to a decrease of 1.8 million kilos or $10.2 million partially offset by an increase in average sales prices of $0.37 or $3.9 million. | |||||||
Processing and other service revenues decreased $2.7 million primarily due to lower quantities of customer owned tobacco processed in the United States. | |||||||
-18- |
|
DIMON Incorporated and Subsidiaries |
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS: (Continued) |
|
Three Months Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to Three Months Ended December 31, 2003 (Continued) |
Gross profit as a percentage of sales increased slightly to 10.7% in 2004 compared to 10.6% in 2003. Gross profit increased $9.2 million or 30.1% from $30.1 million in 2003 to $39.3 million in 2004. Improvements in gross profit are primarily related to increased sales. The gross profit from the current Malawi crop has improved in comparison to the negative impact on the prior year crop from weather. The improvements in margin have been partially offset by the impact of the weather related reduced crop size in Mozambique. Also, the weakening of the US dollar resulted in higher current year crop costs primarily in Europe which negatively impacted gross profit for the quarter. |
|
Selling, administrative and general expenses increased $3.0 million or 10.3% from $29.0 million in 2003 to $32.0 million in 2004. The increase is substantially related to legal and professional fees associated with consents and waivers relating to defaults under our debt covenants and Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 compliance and the impact of expenses denominated in the euro, sterling and Brazilian real. |
|
Other Income of $0.6 million in 2005 relates primarily to fixed asset sales and insurance recoveries. |
Restructuring and asset impairment charges were $0.5 million in 2004 and related primarily to employee severance charges in North America. |
|
Interest expense increased $2.0 million from $11.1 million in 2003 to $13.1 million in 2004. This change is equally attributable to higher average borrowings as well as higher average rates. |
Derivative financial instruments resulted in a benefit of $3.1 million in 2004 compared to $3.9 million in 2003. These items are derived from changes in the fair value of non-qualifying interest rate swap agreements. |
|
Effective tax rates were 33% in 2004 and 30% in 2003. The increase in the tax rate in 2004 includes a tax provision based on an annual estimated tax rate of 31% and an adjustment of $0.8 million for prior year taxes. |
|
Losses from discontinued operations of $0.3 million in 2003 and 2004 are attributable to the decision to discontinue operations in Italy. See Note 2 for further information. |
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to Nine Months Ended December 31, 2003 |
|
Sales and other operating revenues increased 17.1% or $145.0 million from $847.2 million in 2003 to $992.2 million in 2004. This increase is primarily due to a 9.8% or 28.6 million kilo increase in quantities sold and a $0.22 or 7.8% increase in average sales prices per kilo. Sales of non-U.S. tobacco increased $138.8 million and sales of U.S. tobacco increased $10.8 million partially offset by a $4.6 million decrease in processing and service revenues. Non-U.S. quantities increased 27.9 million kilos resulting in a $73.6 million increase in sales. The higher non-U.S. quantities were primarily from Brazil, Argentina, Tanzania and Mozambique due to larger crop sizes in these areas. Asian quantities remain relatively constant as increases in volume from China were offset by decreased quantities of tobacco from Thailand. In Europe, sales of current and prior crop tobacco resul ted in increases from Bulgaria. Deliveries of European oriental tobacco from Greece and Turkey continue to be delayed compared to the prior year. Zimbabwe sales have decreased due to lower supplies of available tobacco. Average prices of non-U.S. tobacco increased $0.22 per kilo resulting in a sales increase of $65.2 million. Changes in average sales prices relate primarily to product mix and include favorable price variances on Brazilian, African and European tobaccos over the prior year. Sales of U.S. tobacco increased $3.8 million due to a 0.7 million increase in kilos and $7.0 million due to a $0.38 per kilo increase in average sales prices. |
Processing and other service revenues decreased $4.6 million primarily due to lower quantities of customer owned tobaccos processed in the United States and Germany. |
Gross profit as a percentage of sales decreased to 15.0% in 2004 compared to 16.6% in 2003. Gross profit increased $7.9 million or 5.7% to $148.3 million in 2004 compared to $140.4 million in 2003. Improvements in gross profit resulting from higher sales volumes were notable in Brazil, Tanzania, Malawi, and China partially offset by lower gross profit from delayed sales from Greece and Turkey. The current Malawi crop gross profit has improved in comparison to the prior year crop that was affected by weather. Gross profit has also been negatively impacted by the poor Sumatra wrapper crop in Northern Brazil and by the weather related reduced crop size in Mozambique. While gross profit has increased, gross profit as a percentage of sales was negatively impacted by higher current year crop costs in Brazil and Europe as a result of the relatively weak dollar. |
-19- |
DIMON Incorporated and Subsidiaries |
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS: (Continued) |
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to Nine Months Ended December 31, 2003 (Continued) |
Selling administrative and general expenses decreased $0.9 million or 1.0% to $92.3 million in 2004 from $93.2 million in 2003. The decrease is primarily due to the recognition of $6.0 million in settlement of the DeLoach class action lawsuit in 2003 partially offset by $3.3 million due to assessments related to an administrative investigation into buying and selling practices within the leaf industry in Spain by the Directorate General for Competition. Other offsets are increased legal and professional fees associated with consents and waivers relating to defaults under our debt covenants and Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 compliance and the impact of expenses denominated in the euro, sterling and Brazilian real. |
Other income of $5.2 million in 2004 relates primarily to fixed asset sales and insurance recoveries. |
Restructuring and asset impairment charges were $2.0 million in 2004 and relate primarily to employee severance charges in North America. |
Interest expense increased $3.6 million from $34.4 million in 2003 to $38.0 million in 2004. This change is due to $6.5 million from higher average rates partially offset by $2.9 million from lower average borrowings. |
Derivative financial instruments resulted in a benefit of $9.7 million in 2004 compared to $5.6 million in 2003. These items are derived from changes in the fair value of non-qualifying interest rate swap agreements. |
Effective tax rates were 33% in 2004 and 31% in 2003. The increase in the tax rate in 2004 includes a tax provision based on an annual estimated tax rate of 31% and an adjustment of $0.8 million for prior year taxes. |
Losses from discontinued operations of $5.7 million in 2004 and $1.3 million in 2003 are attributable to the decision to discontinue operations in Italy. See Note 2 for further information. |
Extraordinary Item On May 1, 2003, we received $2.7 million from the United Nations Compensation Commission in connection with a claim filed by a predecessor company, Monk-Austin, Incorporated. The claim arose from an uncollected trade receivable from the Iraqi Tobacco Monopoly, which related to transactions that occurred prior to Iraqs invasion of Kuwait in August 1990. The extraordinary gain of $1.8 million is recorded net of tax of $0.9 million. |
OUTLOOK AND OTHER INFORMATION: |
|
We believe that the global supply and demand for leaf tobacco continues to be substantially balanced. However, there are indications that production forecasts, if achieved, could exceed global customer demand. In addition, notable significant tobacco production volume reductions continue in the United States. These reductions, as well as anticipated future reductions in Western Europe, have created a shift in the sourcing of customer requirements primarily to Argentina, Brazil, Asia and certain African countries other than Zimbabwe. This has and will continue to impact the ongoing requirements of our organizational structure and asset base. |
On October 22, 2004, President George W. Bush signed into law The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. This complex law includes a U.S. tobacco quota buyout. It repeals the federal tobacco price support and quota programs beginning with the 2005 crops, provides compensation payments to tobacco quota owners and growers, provides an assessment mechanism for consumer tobacco product manufacturers and importers of consumer tobacco products to fund the buyout, and provides for the disposal of existing flue cured and burley cooperative tobacco stocks. The buyout legislation contains no price guarantee or production control provisions. As a result, tobacco can be grown anywhere in the United States, with no limits on volume or protection on price. |
We continue to evaluate the effects of this new legislation on DIMON. As of January 31, 2005, the USDA and other governmental entities have not released the anticipated regulations required to administer the buyout or address how the Commodity Credit Corporation will dispose of 2004 and prior crop leaf inventories held by the Cooperatives. Risk of excess inventory through the non-governmental supply chain will continue to depend on the supply and demand for U.S. leaf tobacco. In the meantime, grower contracting for the 2005 U.S. flue-cured and burley crops is currently underway with lower projected costs and sales prices compared to the 2004 crops. It is still too early to estimate the significance of the quota buyout and whether it will affect the U.S. leaf markets enough to make U.S. leaf competitive in the global flue-cured and burley markets. |
|
-20- |
|
DIMON Incorporated and Subsidiaries |
|
As of December 31, 2004, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act (the Act). Based upon this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, giving effect to the changes discussed below, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. |
Internal Control over Financial Reporting |
In October 2004, the Company determined that defaults had occurred under the Limitation on Restricted Payments covenant in the indentures (the Senior Notes Indentures) relating to both its $200 million 9 5/8% Senior Notes due 2011 and its $125 million 7 3/4 % Senior Notes due 2013 (collectively, the Notes), and that, by definition, the defaults under the Senior Notes Indentures created automatic defaults under the Companys $150 million syndicated credit facility and certain operating lines of credit, neither of which could be automatically remedied by a waiver of the defaults under the Senior Notes Indentures. |
The defaults related to the determination of amounts available to make certain Restricted Payments under the indentures. The payments in question were four dividend payments on the Companys common stock made between December 2003 and September 2004 (totaling approximately $13.5 million) and investments in a majority-owned subsidiary during the same period (totaling approximately $8.7 million). The Company had interpreted the indentures to permit the payment of common stock dividends and the investment in this subsidiary provided that there was sufficient availability in the Restricted Payments basket described in the indentures and that the Company was able to incur additional indebtedness under various permitted indebtedness baskets described in the indentures. The Company subsequently determined that the indentures prohibit these Restricted Payments if a more stringent consolidated interest coverage test is not satisfied. |
The Company solicited and on November 1, 2004, obtained consents from the holders of the Notes to a waiver of certain defaults under the related indentures. At the same time, the Company amended the indentures pursuant to which the Notes were issued. Additional information concerning the consent solicitation and resulting amendment of the Senior Notes Indentures is disclosed in Note 9. |
In June 2004, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB, adopted rules for purposes of implementing Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which include revised definitions of material weaknesses and significant deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting. The PCAOB defined a material weakness in internal controls over financial reporting as a significant deficiency, or a combination of significant deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. Although the Company is not currently subject to Section 404, management has concluded that the failure to identify the default under the Senior Note Indentures constituted a material weakness in the Companys internal controls over financial reporting as defined by the PCAOB. The Company believes it has undertaken appropriate measures to remedy this material weakness, including the implementation of additional reviews and supplemental testing of covenant compliance computations by multiple parties. |
-22- |
|
DIMON Incorporated and Subsidiaries |
|
Part II. Other Information |
|
|
Since October 2001, the Directorate General for Competition (DGCOMP) of the European Commission (EC) has been conducting an administrative investigation into certain tobacco buying and selling practices alleged to have occurred within the leaf tobacco industry in Spain and Italy. We believe that the DGCOMP may be conducting similar investigations in other countries. Our subsidiaries in Spain (Agroexpansion) and Italy (DIMON Italia) have cooperated with the DGCOMP. The EC issued separate Statements of Objections (the Statements) relating to buying practices in Spain and Italy. The Statements allege that the buying practices of the tobacco processors and producers in Spain and Italy constitute infringements of EC competition laws. Both Agroexpansion and DIMON Italia have filed a response to the Statements of Objections relating to Spain and Italy, respectively, and the EC conducted separate oral hearings on the Spanish and Italian matters. On October 20, 2004, the DGCOMP notified us that we and Agroexpansion have been assessed a fine in the amount of euro 2.59 million (US$3.3 million) which was accrued in selling, general and administrative expenses at September 30, 2004. Several tobacco processors, growers, and agricultural associations that were the subject of the investigation in Spain were assessed fines in various amounts totaling euro 20 million (US$25.1 million). The fines were reduced as a result of the tobacco processors', including Agroexpansion's, cooperation in the DGCOMP investigation. Both we and Agroexpansion are currently appealing this determination and related fine. The EC investigation with respect to Spain and potentially other countries is ongoing. Based on its understanding of the facts and the activities of DIMON Italia, DIMON believes there have been infringements of EC law, penalties could be assessed and such penalties could be material. DIMON believes that the cooperation of its subsidiary, DIMON Italia, could result in a reduction of any penalties imposed with respect to Italy. |
In March 2004, we discovered potential irregularities with respect to certain bank accounts in southern Europe and central Asia. Our Audit Committee of the Board of Directors engaged an outside law firm to conduct an investigation of activity relating to these accounts. That investigation revealed that, although the amounts involved were not material and had no material impact on our historical financial statements, there have been payments from these accounts that may have violated the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. We voluntarily reported the payments to the appropriate U.S. authorities. In July 2004, we closed the accounts in question and implemented personnel changes and other measures designed to prevent similar situations in the future, including the addition of new finance and internal audit staff in Europe and enhancement of existing training programs. |
If the U.S. authorities determine that there have been violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, they may seek to impose sanctions on us that may include injunctive relief, disgorgement, fines, penalties and modifications to business practices. It is not possible to predict at this time whether the authorities will determine that violations have occurred, and if they do, what sanctions they might seek to impose. It is also not possible to predict how the governments investigation or any resulting sanctions may impact our business, results of operations or financial performance, although any monetary penalty assessed may be material to our results of operations in the quarter in which it is imposed. We will continue to cooperate with the authorities in these matters. |
|
|
The information contained in the Form 8-K, filed on November 3, 2004, relating to the amendments to the Senior Notes Indentures, is incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
See Item 4, Internal Controls over Financial Reporting above. |
|
None. |
|
None. |
-23- |
|
||||
|
||||
DIMON Incorporated and Subsidiaries |
||||
|
|
|||
(a) |
Exhibits |
See Index of Exhibits after Signature Page |
||
|
||||
-24- |
|
||
DIMON Incorporated and Subsidiaries |
||
|
||
|
||
SIGNATURES |
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. |
||
|
DIMON Incorporated |
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
/s/ Thomas G. Reynolds |
|
Date: February 8, 2005 |
|
Thomas G. Reynolds |
|
||
|
||
-25- |