RUBIOS RESTAURANTS INC - 10-Q Quarterly Report

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)


[X]		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 29, 2003


[ ]		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number: 000-26125

RUBIO’S RESTAURANTS, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)


DELAWARE (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		33-0100303 (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

1902 WRIGHT PLACE, SUITE 300, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(760) 929-8226
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. (1) Yes [X] No [ ]

(2) Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as indicated in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [X] No [ ]

As of August 6, 2003 there were 9,104,134 shares of the Registrant’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS


PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
		CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
		CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS — UNAUDITED
		CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS — UNAUDITED
		NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — UNAUDITED
	Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
	Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
	Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
	Item 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
	Item 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
	Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
	Item 5. OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
SIGNATURES
EXHIBIT 31.1
EXHIBIT 31.2
EXHIBIT 32.1
EXHIBIT 32.2

RUBIO’S RESTAURANTS, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS


		Page

PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 29, 2003 (unaudited) and December 29, 2002	3
	Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the thirteen weeks and twenty-six weeks ended June 29, 2003 and June 30, 2002	4
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the twenty-six weeks ended June 29, 2003 and June 30, 2002	5
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	6
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	11
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	26
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	26
PART II	OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	28
Item 2.	Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds	28
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	28
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	28
Item 5.	Other Information	29
Item 6.	Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K	29
	Signatures	30

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

RUBIO’S RESTAURANTS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)


					June 29,			December 29,
					2003			2002

					(unaudited)			(see Note)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
	Cash and cash equivalents				$	5,383		$	8,578
	Short-term investments					2,832			1,279
	Income taxes receivable					575			357
	Other receivables					501			818
	Inventory					1,105			1,250
	Prepaid expenses					537			600

		Total current assets				10,933			12,882
PROPERTY - Net						33,262			35,504
OTHER ASSETS						376			366
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES						4,425			2,403

TOTAL					$	48,996		$	51,155

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
	Accounts payable				$	1,839		$	1,990
	Accrued expenses and other liabilities					5,586			3,832
	Store closure reserve					270			559
	Line of credit					—			1,000
	Deferred income taxes					120			90

		Total current liabilities				7,815			7,471
STORE CLOSURE RESERVE						1,166			1,248
DEFERRED INCOME						509			69
DEFERRED RENT						1,973			1,971
DEFERRED FRANCHISE REVENUE						25			36

			Total liabilities			11,488			10,795

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (NOTE 5)
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
	Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding					—			—
	Common stock, $.001 par value, 75,000,000 shares authorized, 9,104,134 issued and outstanding in 2003, and 9,052,358 issued and outstanding in 2002					9			9
	Paid-in capital					42,035			41,868
	Deferred compensation					585			510
	Accumulated other comprehensive income					—			3
	Accumulated deficit					(5,121	)		(2,030	)

				Total stockholders’ equity		37,508			40,360

TOTAL					$	48,996		$	51,155

Note: The balance sheet as of December 29, 2002 is derived from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and is in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Entire notes for the audited period are not included in this report.

See notes to consolidated financial statements-unaudited.

RUBIO’S RESTAURANTS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS - UNAUDITED
(In thousands, except per share data)


			13 Weeks Ended						26 Weeks Ended

			June 29,			June 30,			June 29,			June 30,
			2003			2002			2003			2002

REVENUE:
	Restaurant sales		$	31,403		$	30,607		$	61,808		$	60,450
	Franchise and licensing revenue			46			94			107			129

TOTAL REVENUE				31,449			30,701			61,915			60,579

COSTS AND EXPENSES:
	Cost of sales			9,518			8,248			18,499			16,579
	Restaurant labor, occupancy and other			19,813			16,726			37,376			33,481
	General and administrative expenses			3,081			2,481			5,504			5,189
	Depreciation and amortization			1,414			1,315			2,798			2,599
	Pre-opening expenses			41			3			86			93
	Asset impairment and store closure expense			2,627			—			2,627			—
	Loss on disposal/sale of property			207			40			173			39

TOTAL COSTS AND EXPENSES				36,701			28,813			67,063			57,980

OPERATING (LOSS) INCOME				(5,252	)		1,888			(5,148	)		2,599

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) - NET:
	Interest and investment income			30			24			50			56
	Interest expense			(24	)		(32	)		(54	)		(64	)

		OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) - NET		6			(8	)		(4	)		(8	)

(LOSS)INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES				(5,246	)		1,880			(5,152	)		2,591
INCOME TAX BENEFIT (EXPENSE)				2,099			(752	)		2,061			(1,036	)

NET (LOSS) INCOME			$	(3,147	)	$	1,128		$	(3,091	)	$	1,555

NET (LOSS) INCOME PER SHARE:
	Basic		$	(0.35	)	$	0.13		$	(0.34	)	$	0.17

	Diluted		$	(0.35	)	$	0.12		$	(0.34	)	$	0.17

SHARES USED IN CALCULATING NET (LOSS) INCOME PER SHARE:
	Basic			9,092			8,998			9,081			8,982

	Diluted			9,092			9,185			9,081			9,126

See notes to consolidated financial statements-unaudited.

RUBIO’S RESTAURANTS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - UNAUDITED
(In thousands)


					26 Weeks Ended

					June 29, 2003			June 30, 2002

OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
	Net (loss) income				$	(3,091	)	$	1,555
	Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities:
		Depreciation and amortization				2,798			2,599
		Deferred compensation				75			190
		Asset impairment and store closure expense				2,627			—
		Loss on disposal/sale of property				173			39
		Changes in assets and liabilities:
			Income taxes receivable			(218	)		1,065
			Other receivables			317			158
			Inventory			145			394
			Prepaid expenses			63			(1,227	)
			Deferred income taxes			(1,992	)		896
			Other assets			(10	)		52
			Accounts payable			(151	)		(1,315	)
			Accrued expenses and other liabilities			1,754			581
			Store closure reserve			(291	)		(821	)
			Deferred income			440			—
			Deferred rent			2			173
			Deferred franchise revenue			(11	)		(28	)

				Cash provided by operating activities		2,630			4,311

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
	Purchases of property					(3,487	)		(1,918	)
	Proceeds from sale of property					51			311
	Purchases of investments					(2,573	)		(2,100	)
	Sales and maturities of investments					1,017			1,770

				Cash used in investing activities		(4,992	)		(1,937	)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
	Repayment of line of credit borrowing					(1,000	)		—
	Proceeds from exercise of common stock options, net of tax					167			218

				Cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(833	)		218

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS						(3,195	)		2,592
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD						8,578			4,710

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD					$	5,383		$	7,302

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
	Cash paid for interest				$	24		$	50
	Cash paid (received) for income taxes				$	10		$	(875	)

See notes to consolidated financial statements-unaudited.

RUBIO’S RESTAURANTS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying consolidated financial information has been prepared by Rubio’s Restaurants, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Rubio’s Restaurants of Nevada, Inc. (collectively, the “Company”) without audit and reflects all adjustments, consisting of normal and recurring adjustments, which are in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the interim periods. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and in accordance with the regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such SEC rules and regulations. These unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2002 included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K and the review of our more critical accounting policies identified under the caption “Critical Accounting Policies” in that report. Results for the interim periods presented in this report are not necessarily indicative of results which may be reported for any other interim period or for the entire fiscal year.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS - In July 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,” which addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and supersedes Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring).” SFAS No. 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. Under Issue No. 94-3, a liability for an exit cost, as defined in EITF Issue No. 94-3 was recognized at the date of an entity’s commitment to an exit plan. SFAS No. 146 establishes that the liability should initially be measured and recorded at fair value. The Company was required to adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 146 for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. The adoption of SFAS No. 146 did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations.

RECLASSIFICATIONS - - Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified in the notes to the consolidated financial statements to conform to the current period presentation.

2. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION - SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock Based-Compensation” as amended by SFAS No. 148 “Accounting for Stock Compensation - Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123,” provides accounting guidance related to stock based employee compensation. SFAS No. 123, as amended, encourages, but does not require, companies to record compensation cost for stock-based employee compensation plans at fair value. The Company has chosen to continue to account for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”, and related interpretations for all periods presented. Accordingly, compensation cost for stock options is measured

RUBIO’S RESTAURANTS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED, (Continued)

as the excess, if any, of the fair value of the Company’s stock at the date of the grant over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock.

The following table summarizes the impact on the Company’s net (loss) income had compensation cost been determined based upon the fair value at the grant date for awards under the stock option plans consistent with the methodology prescribed under SFAS No. 123 (in thousands, except per share data):


		13 Weeks Ended					26 Weeks Ended

		June 29,			June 30,		June 29,			June 30
		2003			2002		2003			2002

Net (loss) income as reported		$	(3,147	)	$	1,128	$	(3,091	)	$	1,555
Deduct: Stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects			179			19		280			145

Pro forma net (loss) income		$	(3,326	)	$	1,109	$	(3,371	)	$	1,410

(Loss) income per share:
	Basic - as reported	$	(0.35	)	$	0.13	$	(0.34	)	$	0.17
	Basic - pro forma	$	(0.37	)	$	0.12	$	(0.37	)	$	0.16
	Diluted - as reported	$	(0.35	)	$	0.12	$	(0.34	)	$	0.17
	Diluted - pro forma	$	(0.37	)	$	0.12	$	(0.37	)	$	0.15

The pro forma compensation costs were determined using the weighted average fair values at the date of grant for options granted during the 13 weeks ended June 29, 2003 and June 30, 2002 of $3.47 and $5.11 per share, respectively and for the 26 weeks ended June 29, 2003 and June 30, 2002 of $3.10 and $4.73 per share, respectively. The fair value of each option granted was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:


	13 Weeks Ended						26 Weeks Ended

	June 29,			June 30,			June 29,			June 30,
	2003			2002			2003			2002

Expected dividend yield	None			None			None			None
Expected stock price volatility		71	%		74	%		59	%		67	%
Risk-free interest rate		4.0	%		4.0	%		4.0	%		4.0	%
Expected lives of options	5 years			5 years			5 years			5 years

3. ASSET IMPAIRMENT AND STORE CLOSURE EXPENSE

Asset Impairment - The Company periodically assesses its ability to recover the carrying value of its long-lived assets. If the Company concludes that the carrying value will not be recovered based on expected undiscounted future cash flows, an impairment write-down is recorded to reduce the asset to its estimated fair value.

Impairment is reviewed at the lowest levels for which there are identifiable cash flows that are independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets. In

RUBIO’S RESTAURANTS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED (continued)

3. ASSET IMPAIRMENT AND STORE CLOSURE EXPENSE (continued)

the Company’s circumstances, such analysis is performed on an individual restaurant basis. The impairment charge is the difference between the carrying value and the estimated fair value of the assets (for assets to be held and used) and fair value less cost to sell (for assets to be disposed of). In the 13 weeks ended June 29, 2003, the Company recorded an impairment loss of $2.7 million on 16 restaurant locations. Of these locations, five were outside of Southern California and four had been previously partially impaired in 2001. The Company currently plans to operate these restaurant locations through the end of their remaining lease terms, generally from 2005 through 2010. The assets impaired at these locations consisted of leasehold improvements and fixtures and equipment. Fair value of the leasehold improvements was determined based on discounted cash flows and the lower of the net book value or an estimate of current liquidation value for fixtures and equipment. The three factors that lead to the impairment charge were lower than anticipated increases in comparative store sales, higher than anticipated operating costs associated with the Company’s system-wide brand repositioning program and escalating workers’ compensation costs.

Store Closure Reserve - The Company makes decisions to close stores based on their cash flows and anticipated future profitability. The Company recognizes the cost and related liabilities associated with the closure of restaurants measured initially at its fair value in the period in which the liability is incurred. These store closure charges primarily represent a liability for the future lease obligations after the expected closure dates, net of estimated sublease income, if any.

During fiscal 2001, the Company recorded a $4.8 million charge related to store closures. The changes in the store closure reserve during the 26 weeks ended June 29, 2003 were as follows (in thousands):


		Reserve											Reserve
		Balance at			Store		Store						Balance at
		December 29,			Closure		Closure						June 29,
		2002			Expense		Reversal			Usage			2003

Reserve for stores closed in 2001		$	787		$	30	$	(376	)	$	(226	)	$	215
Reserve for stores closed in 2002 and 2003			978			309		(2	)		(64	)		1,221
Severance and other costs			42			—		(41	)		(1	)		—

	Total store closure reserve		1,807		$	339	$	(419	)	$	(291	)		1,436

	Less: current portion		(559	)										(270	)

	Non-current	$	1,248										$	1,166

During the 26 weeks ended June 29, 2003, the reserve for stores closed in 2002 and 2003 was increased $0.3 million to reflect the difficulty in identifying suitable sub lessees and the Company’s revised estimate that it will need to continue full

RUBIO’S RESTAURANTS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED (continued)

3. ASSET IMPAIRMENT AND STORE CLOSURE EXPENSE (continued)

lease payments longer than originally estimated. The reserve for the stores closed in 2001 was reduced $0.4 million based on lease terminations and subleases that were more favorable than the original estimates. Approximately $0.3 million was charged against the reserve primarily representing the Company’s recurring lease obligation payments.

4. BALANCE SHEET DETAILS as of June 29, 2003 and December 29, 2002, respectively (in thousands):


		2003			2002

OTHER RECEIVABLES:
	Beverage usage receivables	$	209		$	274
	Tenant improvement receivables		110			210
	Other receivables		182			334

Total		$	501		$	818

INVESTMENTS:
	Corporate bonds	$	437		$	1,111
	Municipal bonds		2,395			168

			2,832			1,279
	Less: Short-term investments		(2,832	)		(1,279	)

Investments		$	—		$	—

PROPERTY - at cost:
	Building and leasehold improvements	$	31,397		$	28,700
	Equipment and furniture		25,319			26,238
	Construction in process and related costs		1,281			244

			57,997			55,182
	Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization		(24,735	)		(19,678	)

Total		$	33,262		$	35,504

ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER LIABILITIES:
	Workers’ compensation insurance	$	1,836		$	888
	Compensation		960			917
	Advertising		687			110
	Sales taxes		671			861
	Vacation pay		502			464
	Professional fees		275			—
	Benefits		176			69
	Occupancy		103			99
	Other		376			424

Total		$	5,586		$	3,832

5. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

REVOLVING LINE OF CREDIT - As of June 29, 2003 and December 29, 2002, the Company had available $11.0 million and $10.0 million, respectively, of a total $12,000,000 revolving line of credit with a maturity date of July 2004. The

RUBIO’S RESTAURANTS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED (continued)

5. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)

credit line bears interest based on certain leverage ratios and ranges from the lower of a bank reference rate plus 1% - 2%, or an adjusted London Interbank Offered Rate plus 2.5% - 3.5% per annum (3.53% as of June 29, 2003). The Company pays a commitment fee on the unused portion of the line of credit. On June 27, 2003, the Company repaid the $1.0 million borrowing on the line of credit, which was outstanding as of December 29, 2002. As of June 29, 2003 and December 29, 2002, $1.0 million was assigned to a standby letter of credit that matures in October 2003, which is related to the Company’s workers’ compensation insurance policy.

The credit facility contains various covenants including a minimum EBITDA, fixed charge coverage ratio, minimum interest coverage ratio, and maximum total leverage ratio, and places certain restrictions on fixed asset purchases. The revolving line of credit restricts the payment of cash dividends and other stock redemptions or repurchases. The Company’s assets collateralize borrowings under the revolving line of credit. The Company was in compliance with, or received waivers for, the covenants at June 29, 2003. As part of the covenant waiver agreement, the Company has agreed not to borrow under this credit facility while the Company and the bank are negotiating an amendment.

LITIGATION - - As previously disclosed in the Company’s filings with the SEC, on June 28, 2001, a class action complaint was filed against the Company in Orange County, California Superior Court by a former employee, who worked in the position of general manager. A second similar class action complaint was filed in Orange County, California Superior Court on December 21, 2001, on behalf of another former employee who worked in the positions of general manager and assistant manager. The Company classifies both positions as exempt. The former employees each purport to represent a class of former and current employees who are allegedly similarly situated. These cases currently involve the issue of whether employees and former employees in the general and assistant manager positions who worked in the California restaurants during specified time periods were misclassified as exempt and deprived of overtime pay. In addition to unpaid overtime, these cases seek to recover waiting time penalties, interest, attorneys’ fees, and other types of relief on behalf of the current and former employees that these former employees purport to represent.

The Company believes these cases are without merit and intends to vigorously defend against the related claims. These cases are in the early stages of discovery, and the status of the class action certification is yet to be determined for both suits. The two cases have been consolidated into one action. The court granted a motion to disqualify the Company’s counsel. The Court of Appeal reversed this order in June 2003, and the case will be remanded back to the trial court in the near future. The Company continues to evaluate results in similar proceedings and to consult with advisors with specialized expertise. The Company is presently unable to predict the probable outcome of this matter or the amounts of any potential damages at issue. An unfavorable outcome in this matter or a significant settlement could have a material impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

The Company is unaware of any other litigation that could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or business.

RUBIO’S RESTAURANTS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED (continued)

6. (LOSS) INCOME PER SHARE

A reconciliation of basic and diluted (loss) income per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share,” is as follows (in thousands, except per share data):


				13 Weeks Ended					26 Weeks Ended

				June 29,			June 30,		June 29,			June 30,
				2003			2002		2003			2002

Numerator
		Net (loss) income		$	(3,147	)	$	1,128	$	(3,091	)	$	1,555

Denominator
	Basic:
		Weighted average common shares outstanding			9,092			8,998		9,081			8,982
	Diluted:
		Effect of dilutive securities:
			Common stock options		—			187		—			144

			Total weighted average common and potential common shares outstanding		9,092			9,185		9,081			9,126

(Loss) income per share:
	Basic			$	(0.35	)	$	0.13	$	(0.34	)	$	0.17

	Diluted			$	(0.35	)	$	0.12	$	(0.34	)	$	0.17

Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q may contain projections, estimates and other forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including without limitation, those discussed below under “Risk Factors.” While this outlook represents our current judgment on the future direction of the business, such risks and uncertainties could cause actual results to differ materially from any future performance suggested below. We undertake no obligation to release publicly the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances arising after the date of this quarterly report.

OVERVIEW

We opened our first restaurant under the name “Rubio’s, Home of the Fish Taco” in 1983. We position our restaurants in the high-quality, quick-casual Mexican food segment of the restaurant industry. Our business strategy is to become the leading brand in this industry segment.

Rubio’s Restaurants, Inc. was incorporated in California in 1985 and reincorporated in Delaware in 1997. In May 1999, we completed our initial public offering. In late 2000, as part of our expansion strategy, we initiated a franchise program. As of August 1, 2003, we have two franchise agreements

representing commitments to open 6 units, two of which were open as of August 1, 2003. Additionally, on April 15, 2002, we completed the sale of four company-owned stores in the Las Vegas, Nevada market to one of these franchisee groups. Our current expansion plan calls for us to open 8-10 company-owned restaurants and close one underperforming store in fiscal 2003, which was previously identified and reserved for closure in November 2001. We opened two stores during the first quarter and closed the underperforming store in the second quarter of 2003. In addition, the Company converted a franchise location to a company-owned restaurant in the second quarter.

As a result of our expansion, period-to-period comparisons of our financial results may not be meaningful. When a new unit opens, it will typically incur higher than normal levels of food and labor costs until new personnel gain experience. Hourly labor schedules are gradually adjusted downward during the first three months of a restaurant opening, in order to reach operating efficiencies similar to those at established units. In calculating our comparable restaurant base, we introduce a restaurant into our comparable restaurant base once it has been in operation for 15 calendar months.

Revenues represent gross restaurant sales less coupons and other discounts and includes franchise and licensing revenue. Cost of sales is composed of food, beverage, and paper and packaging expense. Components of restaurant labor, occupancy and other expenses include direct hourly and management wages, bonuses, fringe benefit costs, rent and other occupancy costs, advertising and promotion, operating supplies, utilities, maintenance and repairs, and other operating expenses.

General and administrative expenses include all corporate and administrative functions that support existing operations and provide infrastructure to facilitate our future growth. Components of this category include management, supervisory and staff salaries and employee benefits, travel, information systems, training, corporate rent and professional and consulting fees and includes expenses relating to franchise training, the cost of the initial stocking of operating supplies and other direct costs related to opening new units.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). The preparation of these financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingencies at the date of the financial statements as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.

Management evaluates these estimates and assumptions on an on-going basis including those relating to impairment of assets, restructuring charges, contingencies and litigation. Our estimates and assumptions have been prepared on the basis of the most current available information, and actual results could differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions.

We have several critical accounting policies, which were discussed in the Company’s 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K, that are both important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and require management’s most difficult, subjective and complex judgments. Typically, the circumstances that make these judgments complex and difficult have to do with making estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. During the 26 weeks ended June 29, 2003, we have not adopted any new accounting policies that are considered critical accounting policies nor have there been any significant changes related to our critical accounting policies that would have a

material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, cash flow or our ability to conduct business.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

All comparisons in the following section refer to the 13-week period ended June 29, 2003 and the 13-week period ended June 30, 2002, respectively, unless otherwise indicated.

Our operating results, expressed as a percentage of revenue, were as follows:


		13 Weeks Ended

		June 29,			June 30,
		2003			2002

Revenue (1)			100.0	%		100.0	%
Costs and expenses:
	Cost of sales		30.3			26.9
	Restaurant labor, occupancy and other		63.0			54.5
	General and administrative expenses (2)		9.8			8.1
	Depreciation and amortization		4.5			4.3
	Pre-opening expenses		0.1			—
	Asset impairment and store closure expense		8.3			—
	Loss on disposal/sale of property		0.7			0.1

Operating (loss) income			(16.7	)		6.1
	Other income (expense), net		—			—

(Loss) income before income taxes			(16.7	)		6.1
Income tax benefit (expense)			6.7			(2.4	)%

Net (loss) income			(10.0	)%		3.7	%

(1)Includes $46,000 and $94,000 in franchise and licensing revenue for the 13 weeks ended June 29, 2003 and June 30, 2002, respectively.

(2)Includes $76,000 and $129,000 in franchise expense for the 13 weeks ended June 29, 2003 and June 30, 2002, respectively.

13 WEEKS ENDED JUNE 29, 2003 COMPARED TO THE 13 WEEKS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002

Results of operations reflect 13 weeks of operations for 137 restaurants and a partial period of operations for two restaurants for the 13 weeks ended June 29, 2003. Results of operations also reflect 13 weeks of operations for 134 restaurants and a partial period of operations for four restaurants for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2002.

REVENUE. Revenue increased $0.7 million or 2.4%, to $31.4 million for the 13 weeks ended June 29, 2003 from $30.7 million for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2002. The increase in 2003 was primarily due to sales of $0.6 million from our two 2003 store openings and the converted franchise store, a $0.5 million increase in sales generated by a full quarter of operations from units opened in 2002 that were not yet in our comparable unit base and an increase in comparable store sales of $0.1 million or 0.3%, offset by a decrease of $0.3 million in sales at the four stores that have been closed, $0.1 million for the four stores sold to a franchisee and $0.1 million decrease in franchising and licensing revenue. Units enter the comparable store base after 15 full months of operation. The increase in comparable sales was primarily due to a 5.5% increase in average check, offset by a 4.9% decrease in transactions. Sales were softer than expected, reflecting, in part, poor southern California weather, weak retail activity because of the war in Iraq, and overall economic conditions.

COST OF SALES. Cost of sales as a percentage of revenue increased to 30.3% in the 13 weeks ended June 29, 2003 from 26.9% in the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2002.

The increase was primarily due to the higher food and paper costs associated with our larger portions, expanded salsa bar and upgraded packaging for our brand repositioning. In addition, the product mix has shifted from lower priced fish menu items to higher priced chicken and steak menu items, as a result of the new menu combined with a strong discount promotion in the quarter.

RESTAURANT LABOR, OCCUPANCY AND OTHER. Restaurant labor, occupancy, and other increased as a percentage of revenue to 63.0% for the 13 weeks ended June 29, 2003 from 54.5% in the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2002. The 8.5% increase as a percentage of revenue was due to a 3.8% increase in workers’ compensation expenses caused by unusually costly claims that required the Company to increase its workers’ compensation reserve, a 2.7% increase in advertising expenses due to a new advertising campaign to drive traffic, a 0.9% increase in labor associated with the training required for the conversion to the brand repositioning, guest service tests and a ramp up in employees for summer sales, and a 1.1% increase in unit operating expenses associated with supplies, upgrades and uniforms for this repositioning that were higher than those experienced in early test markets for the repositioning.

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. General and administrative expenses were $3.1 million or 9.8% of revenue for the 13 weeks ended June 29, 2003 as compared to $2.5 million or 8.1% of revenue for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2002. The 1.7% increase as a percentage of revenue was primarily due to a 2.0% increase in professional service fees and a 0.4% increase in recruiting costs, offset by a 0.7% decrease in corporate labor related costs.

DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION. Depreciation and amortization expenses of $1.4 million in the 13 weeks ended June 29, 2003 increased $0.1 million from $1.3 million for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2002. The $0.1 million increase was due to the increased number of stores in 2003 over 2002 and the increase in fixed assets necessary for the brand repositioning.

PRE-OPENING EXPENSES. Pre-opening expenses increased to $41,000 for the 13 weeks ended June 29, 2003 from $3,000 for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2002. The increase was due to the two first quarter 2003 store openings and the second quarter converted franchise store compared to minimal expenses for 2002 store openings during the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2002.

ASSET IMPAIRMENT AND STORE CLOSURE EXPENSE. In the 13 weeks ended June 29, 2003, we recorded a $2.7 million charge related to the impairment of sixteen under-performing restaurants as required under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” Of these locations, five were outside of Southern California and four had been previously partially impaired in 2001. All of the associated restaurants are expected to remain open through the end of their lease terms, generally from 2005 to 2010. The assets impaired at these under-performing locations consisted of leasehold improvements and fixtures and equipment. Fair value of the leasehold improvements was determined based on discounted cash flows and the lower of the net book value or an estimate of current liquidation value for fixtures and equipment. The three factors that lead to the impairment charge were the lower than anticipated increases in comparative store sales, higher than anticipated operating costs associated with the Company’s system-wide brand repositioning program and escalating workers’ compensation costs. During the 13 weeks ended June 29, 2003, the reserve for stores closed in 2002 and 2003 was increased $0.3 million to reflect the difficulty in identifying suitable sub lessees and the Company’s revised estimate that it will need to continue full lease payments longer than originally estimated. The reserve for the stores closed in 2001 was reduced $0.4 million based on lease terminations and subleases that were more favorable than the original estimates. Approximately $0.2 million was charged against the reserve primarily representing the Company’s recurring lease obligation payments.

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE), NET. Net other income (expense) fluctuated to $6,000 for the 13 weeks ended June 29, 2003 from $(8,000) for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2002. Interest income increased to $30,000 for the 13 weeks ended June 29, 2003 from $24,000 for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2002 primarily due to fluctuating interest rates paid on our investments. Interest expense decreased to $24,000 for the 13 weeks ended June 29, 2003 from $32,000 for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2002 due to reductions in the interest rate charged on our line of credit.

INCOME TAXES. The income tax benefit (expense) for the 13 weeks ended June 29, 2003 and June 30, 2002 is based on the approximate annual effective tax rate of 40% applied to the respective period’s pretax book (loss) income. The 40% tax rate applied to the 13 weeks ended June 29, 2003 comprises the federal and state statutory rates based on the estimated annual effective rate on a pre-tax loss of $5.2 million. The 40% tax rate applied to the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2002 comprises the federal and state statutory rates based on the estimated annual effective rate on pre-tax income of $1.9 million.

All comparisons in the following section refer to the 26-week period ended June 29, 2003 and the 26-week period ended June 30, 2002, respectively, unless otherwise indicated.

Our operating results, expressed as a percentage of revenue, were as follows:


		26 Weeks Ended

		June 29,			June 30,
		2003			2002

Revenue (1)			100.0	%		100.0	%
Costs and expenses:
	Cost of sales		29.9			27.4
	Restaurant labor, occupancy and other		60.4			55.3
	General and administrative expenses (2)		8.9			8.6
	Depreciation and amortization		4.5			4.3
	Pre-opening expenses		0.1			0.1
	Asset impairment and store closure expense		4.2			—
	Loss on disposal/sale of property		0.3			—

Operating (loss) income			(8.3	)		4.3
	Other income (expense), net		—			—

(Loss) income before income taxes			(8.3	)		4.3
Income tax benefit (expense)			3.3			(1.7	)

Net (loss) income			(5.0	)%		2.6	%

(1)Includes $107,000 and $129,000 in franchise and licensing revenue for the 26 weeks ended June 29, 2003 and June 30, 2002, respectively.

(2)Includes $137,000 and $213,000 in franchise expense for the 26 weeks ended June 29, 2003 and June 30, 2002, respectively.

26 WEEKS ENDED JUNE 29, 2003 COMPARED TO THE 26 WEEKS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002

Results of operations reflect 26 weeks of operations for 134 restaurants and partial period operations for four restaurants for the 26 weeks ended June 29, 2003. Results of operations also reflect 26 weeks of operations for 129 restaurants and a partial period of operations for ten restaurants for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2002.

REVENUE. Revenue increased $1.3 million or 2.2%, to $61.9 million for the 26 weeks ended June 29, 2003 from $60.6 million for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2002. The increase in 2003 was primarily due to sales of $0.8 million from our three 2003 store openings, $1.5 million in sales generated by a full six months of operations from units opened in 2002 that were not yet in our comparable unit base and an increase in comparable store sales of $0.5 million or 0.9%, offset by a decrease of $0.7 million in sales from the four stores that have been closed and $0.8 million for the four stores sold to a franchisee. Units enter the comparable

store base after 15 full months of operation. The increase in comparable store sales was primarily due to a 5.8% increase in the average check amount, offset by a 4.6% decrease in transactions. Sales were softer than expected, reflecting, in part, poor southern California weather, weak retail activity because of the war in Iraq, and overall economic conditions.

COST OF SALES. Cost of sales as a percentage of revenue increased to 29.9% in the 26 weeks ended June 29, 2003 from 27.4% in the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2002. The increase was primarily due to the higher food and paper costs associated with our larger portions, expanded salsa bar and upgraded packaging for our brand repositioning. In addition, the product mix has shifted from lower priced fish menu items to higher priced chicken and steak menu items, as a result of the new menu combined with a strong discount promotion in the quarter.

RESTAURANT LABOR, OCCUPANCY AND OTHER. Restaurant labor, occupancy, and other increased as a percentage of revenue to 60.4% for the 26 weeks ended June 29, 2003 from 55.3% in the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2002. The 5.1% increase as a percentage of revenue was due to a 1.9% increase in workers’ compensation expenses caused by unusually costly claims that required the Company to increase its workers’ compensation reserve, a 1.5% increase in advertising expenses due to a new advertising campaign designed to drive traffic, a 0.7% increase in labor associated with the training required for the conversion to the brand repositioning, guest service tests and a ramp up in employees for summer sales, and a 1.0% increase in unit operating expenses associated with supplies, upgrades and uniforms for this repositioning that were higher than those experienced in early test markets for the repositioning.

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. General and administrative expenses were $5.5 million or 8.9% of revenue for the 26 weeks ended June 29, 2003 compared to $5.2 million or 8.6% of revenue for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2002. The 0.3% increase as a percentage of revenue was primarily due to a 1.0% increase in professional service fees and a 0.5% increase in recruiting costs, offset by a 1.2% decrease in corporate labor related costs.

DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION. Depreciation and amortization expenses increased to $2.8 million in the 26 weeks ended June 29, 2003 from $2.6 million in the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2002. The $0.2 million increase was primarily due to the additional depreciation on the three new units opened during the last six months of 2002, the two new units opened during 2003 and the converted franchise store re-opened in 2003 and on the additional fixed assets necessary for the completion of the brand repositioning. As a percentage of revenue, depreciation and amortization increased to 4.5% for the 26 weeks ended June 29, 2003 from 4.3% for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2002.

PRE-OPENING EXPENSES. Pre-opening expenses decreased to $86,000 for the 26 weeks ended June 29, 2003 from $93,000 for the 26 weeks ended June, 30 2002. The decrease was due in part to fewer stores opened in the first half of 2003. The average pre-opening cost per new unit opening increased from approximately $19,000 per new unit in the prior year to approximately $29,000 per new unit in the current year due to opening new prototype-design locations in 2003 in markets that are either less mature than the locations opened in 2002 or in markets where new store marketing was increased. New markets traditionally require higher pre-opening costs than mature markets due to the lack of leveraging of an existing region’s resources.

ASSET IMPAIRMENT STORE CLOSURE EXPENSE. In the 26 weeks ended June 29, 2003, we recorded a $2.7 million charge related to the impairment of sixteen under-performing restaurants as required under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” Of these locations, five were outside of Southern California and four had been previously partially impaired in 2001. All of the associated restaurants

are expected to remain open through the end of their lease terms, generally from 2005 to 2010. The assets impaired at these under-performing locations consisted of leasehold improvements and fixtures and equipment. Fair value of the leasehold improvements was determined based on discounted cash flows and the lower of the net book value or an estimate of current liquidation value for fixtures and equipment. The three factors that lead to the impairment charge were the lower than anticipated increases in comparative store sales, higher than anticipated operating costs associated with the Company’s system-wide brand repositioning program and escalating workers’ compensation costs. During the 26 weeks ended June 29, 2003, the reserve for stores closed in 2002 and 2003 was increased $0.3 million to reflect the difficulty in identifying suitable sub lessees and the Company’s revised estimate that it will need to continue full lease payments longer than originally estimated. The reserve for the stores closed in 2001 was reduced $0.4 million based on lease terminations and subleases that were more favorable than the original estimates. Approximately $0.3 million was charged against the reserve primarily representing the Company’s recurring lease obligation payments.

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) - NET. Net other expense decreased to $4,000 for the 26 weeks ended June 29, 2003 from $8,000 for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2002. Interest income decreased to $50,000 for the 26 weeks ended June 29, 2003 from $56,000 for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2002. The decrease is primarily due to reduced interest rates paid on investments. Interest expense decreased to $54,000 in the current year from $64,000 in the same prior year period due primarily to interest rate reductions incurred on our borrowing on the credit line.

INCOME TAXES. The income tax benefit (expense) for the 26 weeks ended June 29, 2003 and June 30, 2002 is based on the approximate annual effective tax rate of 40% applied to the respective period’s pretax book (loss) income. The 40% tax rate applied to the 26 weeks ended June 29, 2003 comprises the federal and state statutory rates based on the estimated annual effective rate on pre-tax loss of $5.2 million. The 40% tax rate applied to the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2002 comprises the federal and state statutory rates based on the estimated annual effective rate on pre-tax income of $2.6 million.

SEASONALITY

Historically, we have experienced seasonal variability in our quarterly operating results with higher sales per restaurant in the second and third quarters than in the first and fourth quarters. The higher sales in the second and third quarters improve profitability by reducing the impact of our restaurants’ fixed and semi-fixed costs, as well as through increased revenues. This seasonal impact on our operating results is expected to continue.

INFLATION

Components of our operations subject to inflation include food, beverage, lease, utility, labor and insurance costs. Our leases require us to pay taxes, maintenance, repairs, insurance and utilities, all of which are subject to inflationary increases. We believe that current adverse conditions in the insurance, utility and labor areas specifically, could have an impact on our results of operations during the upcoming year.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

We have funded our capital requirements in recent years through the public sale of equity securities, private placement of preferred stock, bank debt and cash flow from operations. We generated $2.6 million in cash flow from operating activities for the 26 weeks ended June 29, 2003 compared to $4.3 million for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2002.

Net cash used in investing activities was $5.0 million for the 26 weeks ended June 29, 2003 compared to net cash used in investing activities of $1.9 million for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2002. Net cash used in investing activities for the 26 weeks ended June 29, 2003 included $3.5 million in capital expenditures and a net $1.6 million used by the sales, purchases and maturities of investments, where net cash used in investing activities for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2002 consisted of $1.9 million of capital expenditures offset by a net $0.3 million used by the sale, purchases and maturities of investments.

Net cash used in financing activities was $0.8 million for the 26 weeks ended June 29, 2003 compared to net cash provided of $0.2 million for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2002. Financing activities in both periods consisted of proceeds from the exercise of common stock options, net of tax. On June 27, 2003, we repaid the $1,000,000 outstanding borrowings under the line of credit.

As of June 29, 2003, we had available $11.0 million of a total $12.0 million revolving line of credit agreement with a financial institution that matures in July 2004. Also, as of June 29, 2003, we had $1.0 million assigned to standby letters of credit that mature in October 2003. Interest on the revolving line of credit is calculated on the lower of either a bank reference rate plus 1% - 2%, or on an adjusted London Interbank Offered Rate plus 2.5% - 3.5% per annum. The revolving line of credit restricts the payment of cash dividends and other stock redemptions or repurchases. As part of the June 29, 2003 covenant waiver agreement, the Company has agreed not to borrow under this credit facility while the Company and the bank are negotiating an amendment.

Our funds are principally used for the development and opening of new units. We incurred $3.5 million in capital expenditures during the 26 weeks ended June 29, 2003, of which $1.7 million was for new and future stores, $1.5 million for existing locations and $0.3 million for corporate and information technology expenditures.

We currently expect capital expenditures in the second half of 2003 to be approximately $6.3 million, of which approximately $3.8 million is forecasted for the opening of new restaurants, $1.8 million for remodels and maintenance capital expenditures for stores opened in 2002 and before and $0.7 million for corporate, information technology and other. We currently plan to open approximately eight to ten units in 2003. We currently expect that future locations will generally cost between $450,000 and $500,000 per unit, net of landlord allowances and excluding pre-opening expenses. Some units may exceed this range due to the area in which they are built and the specific requirements of the project. Pre-opening expenses are expected to average between $19,000 and $25,000 per restaurant.

The Company is undertaking a number of projects in 2003 designed to potentially improve sales. These projects include a new prototype store design, a potential retrofit design that can be incorporated into existing restaurants, and signage changes that could require a significant amount of capital. The Company is unable to estimate the capital requirements for these projects until certain project tests are complete and rollout schedules are determined.

We believe that anticipated cash flow from operations combined with funds anticipated to be available from our $12.0 million credit facility and our cash and investments balance of $8.2 million as of June 29, 2003 will be sufficient to satisfy our working capital and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next 12 months. Changes in our operating plans, changes in our expansion plans, lower than anticipated sales, our ability to meet the financial covenants of our credit facility, increased expenses, potential acquisitions or other events may cause us to seek additional financing sooner than anticipated. Additional financing may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all. Failure to obtain additional financing as needed could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

RISK FACTORS

Any investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should consider carefully the following information about these risks, together with the other information contained in this quarterly report, before you decide to buy our common stock. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our operations. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business would likely suffer and our results could differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements contained in this quarterly report including those contained in the section captioned “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” under Item 2. In such case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of the money you paid to buy our common stock.

OUR EXPECTED REVENUES, COMPARABLE STORE SALES AND OVERALL EARNINGS PER SHARE MAY NOT BE ATTAINED DUE TO FACTORS REGARDING OUR BRAND AWARENESS OR MARKETING STRATEGY AND/OR OUR ABILITY TO MANAGE ONGOING AND UNANTICIPATED COSTS.

Our expected sales levels and earnings rely heavily on the acceptability and quality of the products we serve. If any variances are experienced with respect to the recognition of our brand, the acceptableness of our promotions, the impact of our advertising campaigns or the ability to manage our ongoing operations, including the ability to absorb unexpected costs, we could fall short of our revenue and earnings expectations. Factors that could have a significant impact on earnings include:

• labor costs for our hourly and management personnel, including increases in federal or state minimum wage requirements;

• fluctuations in food and beverage costs, particularly the cost of chicken, beef, fish, cheese and produce;

• costs related to our leases;

• timing of new restaurant openings and related expenses;

• the amount of sales contributed by new and existing restaurants;

• our ability to achieve and sustain profitability on a quarterly or annual basis;

• the ability of our marketing initiatives and operating improvement initiatives to increase sales;

• consumer confidence;

• changes in consumer preferences;

• the level of competition from existing or new competitors in the quick-casual restaurant industry;

• impact of weather on revenues and costs of food;

• insurance and utility costs; and

• general economic conditions.

OUR CURRENT PROJECTS TO IMPROVE OUR BRAND COULD HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE COMPANY.

We are working on a number of projects designed to improve the strength of our brand and increase sales. These projects include our new prototype restaurant design, a potential store remodel or continuing our re-image program for existing restaurants, signage changes, new menu items, bigger portions, additional salsa bar choices and new product packaging.

The implementation of these projects has capital costs and expenses associated with it. The increase in portion sizes, packaging, new menu items and salsa bar changes will increase the food and paper cost of our restaurants. There is a risk that if these changes do not result in increased sales, either through increased transactions or higher average check or both, there could be a material

adverse impact on our company’s earnings. Also, the capital requirements of these projects could have an adverse material impact on our cash balances and liquidity.

WE MAY NOT PREVAIL IN OUR DEFENSE OF THE CLASS ACTION CLAIMS RELATED TO CALIFORNIA EXEMPT EMPLOYEE LAWS.

During 2001, two similar class action claims were filed against us. Although the cases have not been certified as a class, they have been consolidated into one proceeding and involve the issue of whether employees and former employees in the general manager and assistant manager positions who worked in our California restaurants during specified time periods were misclassified as exempt and deprived of overtime pay. Although we believe these matters are without merit and we intend to vigorously defend the claims related to these matters, we are unable at present to predict the probable outcome of these matters, the amount of damages that may occur if we do not prevail or the amount of any potential settlement. This area of the law is rapidly evolving. An unfavorable outcome in these matters or a significant settlement may have a material adverse impact on our earnings.

OUR FAILURE OR INABILITY TO ENFORCE OUR CURRENT AND FUTURE TRADEMARKS AND TRADE NAMES COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR EFFORTS TO ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN BRAND EQUITY.

Our ability to successfully expand our concept will depend on our ability to establish and maintain “brand equity” through the use of our current and future trademarks, service marks, trade dress and other proprietary intellectual property, including our name and logos. We currently hold four trademarks and have 12 service marks relating to our brand and we have filed applications for two additional marks. Some or all of the rights in our intellectual property may not be enforceable, even if registered against any prior users of similar intellectual property or our competitors who seek to utilize similar intellectual property in areas where we operate or intend to conduct operations. If we fail to enforce any of our intellectual property rights, we may be unable to capitalize on our efforts to establish brand equity. It is also possible that we will encounter claims from prior users of similar intellectual property in areas where we operate or intend to conduct operations.

On October 2, 2002, La Salsa, Inc., by correspondence, requested that we immediately stop all use of the phrase “FRESH MEXICAN GRILL”, which La Salsa, Inc. contends is its service mark. We believe that La Salsa, Inc. has no current enforceable right against us to the phrase “Fresh Mexican Grill” under U.S. trademark law and have so advised La Salsa, Inc. through counsel. On January 24, 2003, by correspondence, La Salsa, Inc. requested that the Company license from La Salsa, Inc. the “Fresh Mexican Grill” service mark in order to avoid litigation.

La Salsa, Inc. is the owner of registration number 2,142,545 on the Principal Register of the USPTO for “La Salsa Fresh Mexican Grill”. This registration disclaims however, any right to “Fresh Mexican Grill”. La Salsa, Inc. is the owner of registration number 2,190,028 on the Supplemental Register of the USPTO for “Fresh Mexican Grill”. This supplemental registration disclaims any right to “Mexican Grill”. On March 1, 2001, La Salsa, Inc. filed another application with the USPTO to attempt registration of “Fresh Mexican Grill” on the Principal Register. The USPTO initially issued a final refusal to La Salsa, Inc.’s effort to register “Fresh Mexican Grill” on the Principal Register, finding that the mark was generic and descriptive. La Salsa, Inc. sought reconsideration of that refusal and amended its application to disclaim “Mexican Grill.” The USPTO reconsidered its refusal and without written opinion has indicated the mark will be approved for publication. The opposition period did open on April 8, 2003. The Company filed a timely opposition. Because of the descriptive nature of “Fresh Mexican Grill”, we believe that opposition to the mark will be successful.

La Salsa, Inc. to date has not filed a lawsuit against us. We intend to vigorously defend our right to use the term “Fresh Mexican Grill” and believe we will be successful in doing so.

WE HAVE CREATED RESERVES RELATED TO THE CLOSURE OF SOME SELECTED STORES. IF THE AMOUNT OF THESE RESERVES ARE INADEQUATE, WE COULD EXPERIENCE AN ADVERSE EFFECT TO OUR EARNINGS EXPECTATIONS IN THE FUTURE.

Our reserves for expenses related to store closures are estimates. The amounts we have recorded are our reasonable assumptions based on the conditions of these locations at this point in time. The conditions regarding these locations may adversely change in the future and materially affect our future earnings. We will review these reserves on a quarterly basis and will likely have adjustments that may materially have a positive or negative impact to our future earnings.

OUR OPERATING RESULTS MAY FLUCTUATE SIGNIFICANTLY DUE TO SEASONALITY AND OTHER FACTORS, WHICH COULD HAVE A NEGATIVE EFFECT ON THE PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK.

Our business is subject to seasonal fluctuations. Historically, sales in most of our restaurants have been higher during the second and third quarters of each fiscal year. As a result, we generally find our highest earnings occur in the second and third quarters of each fiscal year. Accordingly, results for any one quarter or for any year are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any other quarter or for any other year. Comparable unit sales for any particular future period may increase or decrease versus previous history.

THE ABILITY TO ATTRACT AND RETAIN HIGHLY QUALIFIED PERSONNEL TO OPERATE, MANAGE AND SUPPORT OUR RESTAURANTS IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT AND OUR FAILURE TO DO SO COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT US.

Our success and the success of our individual restaurants depends upon our ability to attract and retain highly motivated, well-qualified restaurant operators and management personnel, as well as a sufficient number of qualified employees, including guest service and kitchen staff, to keep pace with our expansion schedule. Qualified individuals needed to fill these positions are in short supply in some geographic areas. Our ability to recruit and retain such individuals may delay the planned openings of new restaurants or result in higher employee turnover in existing restaurants, which could have a material adverse effect on our business or results of operations. We also face significant competition in the recruitment of qualified employees. In addition, we are heavily dependent upon the services of our officers and key management involved in restaurant operations, marketing, product development, finance, purchasing, real estate development, information technologies, human resources and administration. The loss of any of these individuals could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. We generally do not have long-term employment contracts with key personnel except for the employment agreement with our President and Chief Operating Officer, Sheri Miksa.

WE OFFER A FRANCHISE PROGRAM. WE MAY BE UNSUCCESSFUL IN FULLY EXECUTING THIS PROGRAM.

We started a franchise program by entering into agreements with three franchisee groups between 2001 and 2002. In April 2003, our relationship with one of the franchisee groups was terminated when they defaulted on their franchise agreement and closed their franchised location. In May 2003, the Company re-opened this closed restaurant as a Company-owned restaurant. As of May 1, 2003, we have two franchise agreements representing commitments to open 6 units, two of which were open as of August 1, 2003. On April 15, 2002, we completed the sale of four company-owned stores in the Las Vegas, Nevada market to one of these franchisee groups. Restaurant companies typically rely on franchise revenues as a significant source of revenues and potential for growth. Our inability to successfully execute our franchising program could adversely affect our business

and results of operations. The opening and success of franchised restaurants is dependent on a number of factors, including availability of suitable sites, negotiations of acceptable lease or purchase terms for new locations, permitting and government regulatory compliance and the ability to meet construction schedules. The franchisees may not have all of the business abilities or access to financial resources necessary to open our restaurants or to successfully develop or operate our restaurants in their franchise areas in a manner consistent with our standards.

WE MAY BE UNABLE TO FUND OUR SUBSTANTIAL WORKING CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS AND MAY NEED ADDITIONAL FUNDING SOONER THAN WE ANTICIPATE.

We believe that the proceeds from the initial public offering completed in May 1999, together with anticipated cash flow from operations and funds anticipated to be available from our credit facility will be sufficient to satisfy our working capital requirements for at least the next 12 months. We may need to seek additional financing sooner than we anticipate as a result of the following factors:

• changes in our expansion plans;

• changes in our operating plans;

• capital needs associated with the potential re-image and/or remodel of our restaurants, signage changes, menu related changes and other projects;

• lower than anticipated sales of our menu offerings;

• our ability to meet the financial covenants of our credit facility;

• increased food, labor costs or other expenses;

• adverse results in litigation or similar claims;

• potential acquisitions; or

• other events or contingencies.

Additional financing may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all. If we fail to obtain additional financing as needed, our business and results of operations would likely suffer.

FUTURE EXPANSION INTO NEW GEOGRAPHIC AREAS INVOLVES A NUMBER OF RISKS THAT COULD DELAY OR PREVENT THE OPENING OF NEW RESTAURANTS OR REQUIRE US TO ADJUST OUR EXPANSION STRATEGY.

Almost all of our current restaurants are located in the western region of the United States. Our expansion into geographic areas outside the West involves a number of risks, including:

• lack of market awareness or acceptance of our restaurant concept in new geographic areas;

• uncertainties related to local demographics, tastes and preferences;

• local customs, wages, costs and other legal and economic conditions particular to new regions;

• the need to develop relationships with local distributors and suppliers for fresh produce, fresh tortillas and other ingredients; and

• potential difficulties related to management of operations located in a number of broadly dispersed locations.

We may not be successful in addressing these risks. Although we do not have current plans to expand substantially into new markets outside our core markets, if and when we do, we may not be able to open planned new operations on a timely basis, or at all in these new areas. Also, new restaurants typically will take several months to reach planned operating levels due to inefficiencies typically associated with expanding into new regions, such as lack of market awareness, acceptance of our restaurant concept and inability to hire sufficient high-quality staff.

IF WE ARE NOT ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY PURSUE OUR EXPANSION STRATEGY, OUR BUSINESS AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS MAY BE ADVERSELY IMPACTED.

We currently plan to open approximately eight to ten Company-owned restaurants in 2003, two of which have been opened as of June 29, 2003. None of the planned 2003 openings are outside California. Also, in May 2003, we re-opened a closed franchise location in Portland as a Company-owned restaurant. Our ability to successfully achieve our expansion strategy will depend on a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control.

These factors include:

• our ability to operate our restaurants profitably;

• our ability to respond effectively to the intense competition in the quick-casual restaurant industry;

• our ability to locate suitable high-quality restaurant sites or negotiate acceptable lease terms;

• our ability to obtain required local, state and federal governmental approvals and permits related to construction of the sites and food and alcoholic beverages;

• our dependence on contractors to construct new restaurants in a timely manner;

• our ability to attract, train and retain qualified and experienced restaurant personnel and management;

• our need for additional capital and our ability to obtain such capital on favorable terms or at all; and

• general economic conditions.

If we are not able to successfully address these factors, we may not be able to expand at the rate contemplated and may have to adjust our expansion strategy, and our business and results of operations may be adversely impacted.

GOVERNMENT REGULATION CHANGES MAY IMPACT OUR BUSINESS

Our restaurants are subject to licensing and regulation by state and local health, sanitation, safety, fire and other authorities, including licensing and regulation requirements for the sale of food and alcoholic beverages. A substantial number of our employees are subject to various minimum wage requirements. Many of our employees work in restaurants located in California and receive salaries equal to or slightly greater than the California minimum wage. The State of California hourly minimum wage is $6.75.

Additionally, the State of California has increased benefits provided to employees covered under workers’ compensation insurance. Federal and state laws may also require us to provide paid and unpaid leave to our employees, which could result in significant additional expense to us. Similarly, various proposals which would require employers to provide health insurance for all of their employees are being considered from time to time in Congress and various states. The imposition of any requirement that we provide health insurance to all employees would have a material adverse impact on the operations and financial condition of our business and the restaurant industry.

In 2001, the State of California entered into long-term energy contracts at fixed prices that caused our energy costs to dramatically increase. Similar proposals may come before legislators or voters in other jurisdictions in which we operate or seek to operate. The effect of these and further governmental regulations and actions may have a material adverse impact on our earnings.

IF WE ARE NOT ABLE TO ANTICIPATE AND REACT TO INCREASES IN OUR FOOD COSTS, OUR PROFITABILITY COULD BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED.

Our restaurant operating costs principally consist of food and labor costs. Our profitability is dependent on our ability to anticipate and react to changes in food and labor costs. Various factors beyond our control, including adverse weather conditions and governmental regulation, may affect our food costs. We may be unable to anticipate and react to changing food costs, whether through our purchasing practices, menu composition or menu price adjustments in the future. In the event that food price increases cause us to increase our menu prices, we face the risk that our guests will choose to patronize lower-cost restaurants. Failure to react to changing food costs or to retain guests if we are forced to raise menu prices could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

OUR RESTAURANTS ARE CONCENTRATED IN THE WESTERN REGION OF THE UNITED STATES, AND THEREFORE, OUR BUSINESS IS SUBJECT TO FLUCTUATIONS IF ADVERSE CONDITIONS OCCUR IN THAT REGION.

As of June 29, 2003, all but six of our existing restaurants are located in the western region of the United States. Accordingly, we are susceptible to fluctuations in our business caused by adverse economic or other conditions in this region, including natural disasters, terrorist activities or similar events. Our significant investment in, and long-term commitment to, each of our units limits our ability to respond quickly or effectively to changes in local competitive conditions or other changes that could affect our operations. In addition, some of our competitors have many more units than we do. Consequently, adverse economic or other conditions in a region, a decline in the profitability of several existing units or the introduction of several unsuccessful new units in a geographic area, could have a more significant effect on our results of operations than would be the case for a company with a larger number of restaurants or with more geographically dispersed restaurants.

AS A RESTAURANT SERVICE PROVIDER, WE COULD BE SUBJECT TO ADVERSE PUBLICITY OR CLAIMS FROM OUR GUESTS.

We may be the subject of complaints or litigation from guests alleging food-related illness, injuries suffered on the premises or other food quality, health or operational concerns. Adverse publicity resulting from such allegations may materially affect us and our restaurants, regardless of whether such allegations are true or whether we are ultimately held liable. A lawsuit or claim could result in an adverse decision against us that could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

THE RESTAURANT INDUSTRY IS INTENSELY COMPETITIVE AND WE MAY NOT HAVE THE RESOURCES TO COMPETE ADEQUATELY.

The restaurant industry is intensely competitive. There are many different segments within the restaurant industry that are distinguished by types of service, food types and price/value relationships. We position our restaurants in the high-quality, fresh Mexican grill segment of the industry. In this segment, our direct competitors include Baja Fresh, La Salsa and Chipotle. We also compete indirectly with full-service Mexican restaurants including Chevy’s, Chi Chi’s and El Torito and fast food restaurants, particularly those focused on Mexican food such as Taco Bell and Del Taco. Competition in our industry segment is based primarily upon food quality, price, restaurant ambiance, service and location. Many of our direct and indirect competitors are well-established national, regional or local chains and have substantially greater financial, marketing, personnel and other resources than we do. We also compete with many other retail establishments for site locations.

OUR CURRENT INSURANCE MAY NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE LEVELS OF COVERAGE AGAINST CLAIMS OR THE AFFECTS OF ADVERSE PUBLICITY.

There are types of losses we may incur that may be uninsurable or that we believe are not economically insurable, such as losses due to earthquakes and other natural disasters. In view of the location of many of our existing and planned units, our operations are particularly susceptible to damage and disruption caused by earthquakes. Further, we do maintain insurance coverage for employee-related litigation, however, the deductible per incident is high and because of the high cost, we carry only limited insurance for the effects of adverse publicity. In addition, punitive damage awards are generally not covered by insurance. We may also be subject to litigation which, regardless of the outcome, could result in adverse publicity and damages. Such litigation, adverse publicity or damages could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. We do from time to time have employee related claims brought against us. These claims and expenses related to these claims typically have not been material to our overall financial performance. We may experience claims or be the subject of complaints or allegations from former, current or prospective employees from time to time that are material in nature and that may have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

WE MAY INCUR SIGNIFICANT REAL ESTATE RELATED COSTS AND LIABILITIES WHICH COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR FINANCIAL CONDITION

The majority of our units are leased locations in multi-unit retail centers. The age and condition of the real estate we occupy varies. Some of our locations may require significant repairs due to normal deterioration or due to sudden and accidental incidents, such as plumbing failures. It is difficult to predict how many of our unit locations will require major repairs or refurbishment, and it is also difficult to predict what portion of these potential costs would be covered by insurance. Also, as a lessee of real estate, we are subject to and have received claims that our operations at these locations may have caused property damage or personal injury to others. The fact that the majority of our units are located in multi-unit retail buildings means that if there is a plumbing failure or other event in one of our units, neighboring tenants may be affected, which can subject us to liability for property damage and personal injuries. If we were to incur increased real estate costs and liabilities, it could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

SALES BY OUR EXISTING STOCKHOLDERS OF A LARGE NUMBER OF SHARES OF OUR COMMON STOCK COULD CAUSE OUR STOCK PRICE TO DECLINE.

The market price of our common stock could decline as a result of sales by our existing stockholders of a large number of shares of our common stock in the market or the perception that such sales could occur. These sales also might make it more difficult for us to sell equity securities in the future at a time and at a price that we deem appropriate.

THE MARKET PRICE OF OUR STOCK MAY BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY MARKET VOLATILITY.

The stock market has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. The trading price of our common stock could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to a number of factors, including:

• fluctuations in our quarterly or annual results of operations;

• changes in published earnings estimates by analysts and whether our earnings meet or exceed such estimates;

• additions or departures of key personnel;

• changes in overall market conditions, including the stock prices of other restaurant companies; and

• resolution of litigation.

In the past, companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their stock have been the object of securities class action litigation. If we

were subject to securities class action litigation, it could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources.

THE INTERESTS OF OUR CONTROLLING STOCKHOLDERS MAY CONFLICT WITH YOUR INTERESTS.

As of June 29, 2003, the executive officers, directors and entities affiliated with them, in the aggregate, beneficially own approximately 32.7% of our outstanding common stock. These stockholders are able to influence the outcome of matters requiring approval by our stockholders, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. This concentration of ownership may also have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of our Company.

ANTI-TAKEOVER PROVISIONS IN OUR CHARTER DOCUMENTS AND DELAWARE LAW COULD MAKE A THIRD-PARTY ACQUISITION OF US DIFFICULT.

The anti-takeover provisions in our certificate of incorporation, our bylaws and Delaware law could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us. As a result of these provisions, we could delay, deter or prevent a takeover attempt or third party acquisition that our stockholders consider to be in their best interest, including a takeover attempt that results in a premium over the market price for the shares held by our stockholders.

Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Our market risk exposures are related to our cash, cash equivalents and investments. We invest our excess cash in highly liquid short-term investments primarily with maturities of less than one year. The portfolio consists primarily of corporate and municipal bonds. As of June 29, 2003, we had no investments that have maturities in excess of one year. These investments are not held for trading or other speculative purposes. Changes in interest rates affect the investment income we earn on our investments and, therefore, impact our cash flows and results of operations. Due to the types of investment and debt instruments the Company has, a 10% change in period-end interest rates or a hypothetical 100 basis point adverse move in interest rates would not have a significant negative affect on our financial results.

As of June 29, 2003, we had available $11.0 million of a total $12.0 million revolving line of credit with a maturity date of July 2004. As of June 29, 2003, we had $1.0 million assigned to standby letters of credit related to our workers’ compensation insurance policy that mature in October 2003. Interest on the revolving line of credit is calculated on the lower of either a bank reference rate plus 1% - 2%, or on an adjusted London Interbank Offered Rate plus 2.5% - 3.5%, per annum (3.53% as of June 29, 2003). We also pay a commitment fee on the unused portion of the line of credit. Should we make additional draws on this line in the future, changes in interest rates would affect the interest expense on these loans and, therefore, impact our cash flows and results of operations.

Many of the food products purchased by us are affected by changes in weather, production, availability, seasonality and other factors outside our control. In an effort to control some of this risk, we have entered into some fixed price purchase commitments with terms of less than a year. In addition, we believe that almost all of our food and supplies are available from several sources, which helps to control food commodity risks.

Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Based on their evaluation, as of a date within 90 days of the filing of this Form 10-Q, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded the Company’s

disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) are effective.

(b) Changes in Internal Controls. There have been no significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

As previously disclosed in our filings with the SEC, on June 28, 2001, a class action complaint was filed against the Company in Orange County, California Superior Court by a former employee, who worked in the position of general manager. A second similar class action complaint was filed in Orange County, California Superior Court on December 21, 2001, on behalf of another former employee who worked in the positions of general manager and assistant manager. The Company classifies both positions as exempt. The former employees each purport to represent a class of former and current employees who are allegedly similarly situated. These cases currently involve the issue of whether employees and former employees in the general and assistant manager positions who worked in the California restaurants during specified time periods were misclassified as exempt and deprived of overtime pay. In addition to unpaid overtime, these cases seek to recover waiting time penalties, interest, attorneys’ fees, and other types of relief on behalf of the current and former employees that these former employees purport to represent.

Item 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

(a) Not applicable

(b) Not applicable

(c) Not applicable

(d) We currently have approximately $2.1 million remaining from our initial public offering in May 1999 as well as an additional $3.3 million of cash, cash equivalents and investments generated from previous private placements and operating cash flows. The use of proceeds during this reporting period has conformed to our intended use outlined in our initial public offering prospectus.

Item 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not applicable

Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

At the Company’s annual meeting of the shareholders held on June 5, 2003, the stockholders voted on the following matters:

(1) Election of two directors to serve for a three-year term ending upon the 2006 annual meeting of the stockholders. The directors were elected as follows:


Nominee	Votes For		Votes Withheld		Broker Non-Vote

Kyle A. Anderson		8,614,827		191,049	0
Ralph Rubio		8,339,497		466,379	0

As a result, Messrs. Anderson and Rubio were elected as Directors of the Company. The following incumbent members continue to serve on the Board of Directors: Craig Andrews, Jack W. Goodall, Loren Pannier and Timothy J. Ryan.

(2) Ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 28, 2003.


Votes For	Votes Against		Votes Abstain		Broker Non-Votes

8,669,690		125,208		10,978		0

(3) Shareholder proposal regarding the rotation of our independent auditors.


Votes For	Votes Against		Votes Abstain		Broker Non-Votes

282,585		4,240,330		47,455		4,235,506

Item 5. OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable

Item 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K


a)	3.1	(1	)	Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (Exhibit 3.2)

	3.2	(1	)	Restated Bylaws (Exhibit 3.4)

	3.3	(2	)	Certificate of Amendment to Bylaws (Exhibit 3.4)

	31.1			Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

	31.2			Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

	32.1			Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

	32.2			Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


b)		Reports on Form 8-K:

On May 8, 2003, the Company filed a Form 8-K under Item 7, Financial Statements and Exhibits and under Item 9, Regulation FD Disclosure, reporting the issuance of a press release, announcing the Company’s earnings for the quarter ended March 30, 2003.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


Dated: August 13, 2003		RUBIO’S RESTAURANTS, INC.

		/s/ John Fuller

		John Fuller
		Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Incorporated by reference to the above noted exhibit to our registration statement on Form S-1 (333-75087) filed with the SEC on March 26, 1999, as amended.

Incorporated by reference to the above noted exhibit to our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 27, 2003.

	•		labor costs for our hourly and management personnel, including increases in federal or state minimum wage requirements;

	•		fluctuations in food and beverage costs, particularly the cost of chicken, beef, fish, cheese and produce;

	•		costs related to our leases;

	•		timing of new restaurant openings and related expenses;

	•		the amount of sales contributed by new and existing restaurants;

	•		our ability to achieve and sustain profitability on a quarterly or annual basis;

	•		the ability of our marketing initiatives and operating improvement initiatives to increase sales;

	•		consumer confidence;

	•		changes in consumer preferences;

	•		the level of competition from existing or new competitors in the quick-casual restaurant industry;

	•		impact of weather on revenues and costs of food;

	•		insurance and utility costs; and

	•		general economic conditions.

	•		changes in our expansion plans;

	•		changes in our operating plans;

	•		capital needs associated with the potential re-image and/or remodel of our restaurants, signage changes, menu related changes and other projects;

	•		lower than anticipated sales of our menu offerings;

	•		our ability to meet the financial covenants of our credit facility;

	•		increased food, labor costs or other expenses;

	•		adverse results in litigation or similar claims;

	•		potential acquisitions; or

	•		other events or contingencies.

	•		lack of market awareness or acceptance of our restaurant concept in new geographic areas;

	•		uncertainties related to local demographics, tastes and preferences;

	•		local customs, wages, costs and other legal and economic conditions particular to new regions;

	•		the need to develop relationships with local distributors and suppliers for fresh produce, fresh tortillas and other ingredients; and

	•		potential difficulties related to management of operations located in a number of broadly dispersed locations.

	•		our ability to operate our restaurants profitably;

	•		our ability to respond effectively to the intense competition in the quick-casual restaurant industry;

	•		our ability to locate suitable high-quality restaurant sites or negotiate acceptable lease terms;

	•		our ability to obtain required local, state and federal governmental approvals and permits related to construction of the sites and food and alcoholic beverages;

	•		our dependence on contractors to construct new restaurants in a timely manner;

	•		our ability to attract, train and retain qualified and experienced restaurant personnel and management;

	•		our need for additional capital and our ability to obtain such capital on favorable terms or at all; and

	•		general economic conditions.

	•		fluctuations in our quarterly or annual results of operations;

	•		changes in published earnings estimates by analysts and whether our earnings meet or exceed such estimates;

	•		additions or departures of key personnel;

	•		changes in overall market conditions, including the stock prices of other restaurant companies; and

	•		resolution of litigation.