UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FORM 10-Q
x | Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | |
For Quarterly Period Ended March 30, 2003 | ||
o | Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | |
For the transition period from _________ to | ||
Commission File Number 000-30361 |
Illumina, Inc.
Delaware | 33-0804655 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
9885 Towne Centre Drive, San Diego, CA | 92121 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(858) 202-4500
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes x No o
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Common Stock, $0.01 par value | 32,688,967 Shares | |
|
||
Class | Outstanding at March 30, 2003 |
ILLUMINA, INC.
INDEX
Page No. | ||||||
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
||||||
Item 1. Financial Statements |
||||||
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets March 30, 2003
(unaudited) and December 29, 2002 |
3 | |||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations Three
Month Periods Ended March 30, 2003 and March 31, 2002
(unaudited) |
4 | |||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Three
Month Periods Ended March 30, 2003 and
March 31, 2002 (unaudited) |
5 | |||||
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements |
6 | |||||
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations |
13 | |||||
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
27 | |||||
Item 4. Controls and Procedures |
28 | |||||
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION |
||||||
Item 1. Legal Proceedings |
30 | |||||
Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds |
31 | |||||
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities |
31 | |||||
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
31 | |||||
Item 5. Other Information |
31 | |||||
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K |
31 | |||||
Signatures |
33 |
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
ILLUMINA, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
March 30, | December 29, | ||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
ASSETS | (unaudited) | (Note) | |||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||||
Current assets: |
|||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 4,879 | $ | 2,037 | |||||||
Investments, available for sale |
43,024 | 51,727 | |||||||||
Restricted cash and investments |
12,482 | 12,530 | |||||||||
Accounts and interest receivable, net |
2,890 | 3,731 | |||||||||
Inventory, net |
2,340 | 2,299 | |||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
555 | 495 | |||||||||
Total current assets |
66,170 | 72,819 | |||||||||
Property and equipment, net |
48,076 | 48,279 | |||||||||
Intangible and other assets, net |
973 | 808 | |||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 115,219 | $ | 121,906 | |||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
|||||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
$ | 6,723 | $ | 5,568 | |||||||
Accrued litigation judgment |
8,241 | 8,052 | |||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
344 | 340 | |||||||||
Current portion of equipment financing |
348 | 337 | |||||||||
Total current liabilities
|
15,656 | 14,297 | |||||||||
Long-term debt, less current portion |
25,273 | 25,367 | |||||||||
Deferred
revenue |
10,006 | 10,009 | |||||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
398 | 489 | |||||||||
Commitments |
|||||||||||
Stockholders equity |
63,886 | 71,744 | |||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 115,219 | $ | 121,906 | |||||||
Note: The Balance Sheet at December 29, 2002 has been derived from the audited financial statements as of that date.
See accompanying notes.
3
ILLUMINA, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
Three months ended | ||||||||||
March 30, | March 31, | |||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||
Revenue |
||||||||||
Product |
$ | 1,407 | $ | 540 | ||||||
Service |
1,867 | | ||||||||
Research |
1,002 | 729 | ||||||||
Total revenue |
4,276 | 1,269 | ||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||
Cost of product and service revenue |
1,910 | 339 | ||||||||
Research and development |
5,722 | 7,092 | ||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
4,580 | 1,642 | ||||||||
Amortization of deferred compensation
and other non-cash compensation
charges |
865 | 1,225 | ||||||||
Litigation judgment |
189 | | ||||||||
Total operating expenses |
13,266 | 10,298 | ||||||||
Loss from operations |
(8,990 | ) | (9,029 | ) | ||||||
Interest income |
593 | 914 | ||||||||
Interest expense |
(563 | ) | (552 | ) | ||||||
Net loss |
$ | (8,960 | ) | $ | (8,667 | ) | ||||
Net loss per share, basic and diluted |
$ | (0.28 | ) | $ | (0.28 | ) | ||||
Shares used in calculating net loss
per share, basic and diluted |
31,584 | 30,455 | ||||||||
The composition of stock-based
compensation is as follows: |
||||||||||
Research and development |
$ | 495 | $ | 662 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
370 | 563 | ||||||||
$ | 865 | $ | 1,225 | |||||||
See accompanying notes.
4
ILLUMINA, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
Three months ended | |||||||||||
March 30, | March 31, | ||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||||
Operating activities: |
|||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (8,960 | ) | $ | (8,667 | ) | |||||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in
operating activities: |
|||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,108 | 959 | |||||||||
Amortization of premium on investments |
113 | 252 | |||||||||
Amortization of deferred compensation and other non-cash
compensation charges |
865 | 1,225 | |||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|||||||||||
Accounts and interest receivable |
841 | (259 | ) | ||||||||
Inventory |
(41 | ) | (109 | ) | |||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
(60 | ) | (25 | ) | |||||||
Deferred revenue |
(3 | ) | 125 | ||||||||
Other assets |
(185 | ) | 145 | ||||||||
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other liabilities |
1,306 | (245 | ) | ||||||||
Accrued litigation judgment |
39 | | |||||||||
Net cash used in operating activities |
(4,977 | ) | (6,599 | ) | |||||||
Investing activities: |
|||||||||||
Purchase of investment securities |
(1,940 | ) | (25,222 | ) | |||||||
Sales and maturities of investment securities |
10,425 | 36,623 | |||||||||
Purchase of property and equipment |
(870 | ) | (24,304 | ) | |||||||
Purchase of intangible assets |
(16 | ) | (500 | ) | |||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
7,599 | (13,403 | ) | ||||||||
Financing activities: |
|||||||||||
Proceeds from long-term debt |
| 26,000 | |||||||||
Payments on long-term debt |
(90 | ) | (62 | ) | |||||||
Payments on equipment financing |
(80 | ) | (71 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of repurchased shares |
390 | 387 | |||||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
220 | 26,254 | |||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
2,842 | 6,252 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
2,037 | 4,165 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 4,879 | $ | 10,417 | |||||||
See accompanying notes.
5
ILLUMINA, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. | Basis of Presentation |
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In managements opinion, the accompanying financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. Interim financial results are not necessarily indicative of results anticipated for the full year. These unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys 2002 audited financial statements and footnotes included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires that management make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of expenses incurred during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
2. | Summary of Significant Accounting Principles |
Fiscal Year
The Companys fiscal year is 52 or 53 weeks ending the Sunday closest to December 31, with quarters of 13 or 14 weeks ending the Sunday closest to March 31, June 30, and September 30.
Revenue Recognition
The Company records revenue in accordance with the guidelines established by SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 (SAB 101). Under SAB 101, revenue cannot be recorded until all the following criteria are met; persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; the sellers price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and collectibility is reasonably assured. Product revenue consists of sales of oligonucleotides, arrays and genotyping systems. Service revenue consists of revenue received for performing SNP genotyping services. Revenue for oligonucleotide and array sales is recognized generally upon shipment and transfer of title to the customer. Genotyping system revenue is recognized when earned, which is generally upon shipment, transfer of title to the customer and fulfillment of contractually defined acceptance criteria. Reserves are provided for anticipated warranty expenses at the time the associated revenue is recognized. Revenue for genotyping services is recognized generally at the time the genotyping analysis data is delivered to the customer. The
6
ILLUMINA, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(Unaudited)
Company has been awarded $9 million from the National Institutes of Health to perform genotyping services in connection with the International HapMap Project. In some cases, revenue from this project is earned at the time the service activities are performed rather than at the time data is delivered. Research revenue consists of amounts earned under research agreements with collaborators and government grants, which is recognized in the period during which the related costs are incurred. All revenues are recognized net of applicable allowances for returns or discounts.
The Company received $10 million of non-refundable research funding from Applied Biosystems in connection with a licensing and development contract entered into in 1999. This amount has been recorded as deferred revenue in accordance with the provisions of SAB 101. This amount would be recognized as revenue at a rate of 25% of the defined operating profit earned from sales of the products covered by the collaboration agreement, should such sales occur. At present, the Company does not believe a collaboration product will be commercialized under the partnership agreement and there are legal proceedings between the parties as more fully described in Footnote 7. The $10 million of research funding will continue to be reflected as deferred revenue until the legal proceedings have been resolved.
3. Net Loss per Share
Basic and diluted net loss per common share are presented in conformity with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 128, Earnings per Share for all periods presented. In accordance with SFAS No. 128, basic and net loss per share is computed using the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period, less shares subject to repurchase. Diluted net loss per share is typically computed using the weighted average number of common and dilutive common equivalent shares from stock options using the treasury stock method. However, for all periods presented, diluted net loss per share is the same as basic net loss per share because the Company reported a net loss and therefore the inclusion of weighted average shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options would be antidilutive.
Three months ended | ||||||||
March 30, 2003 | March 31, 2002 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding |
32,620 | 32,286 | ||||||
Less: Weighted-average shares of common
stock subject to repurchase |
(1,036 | ) | (1,831 | ) | ||||
Weighted-average shares used in
calculating net loss per share, basic
and diluted |
31,584 | 30,455 | ||||||
7
ILLUMINA, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(Unaudited)
4. Stock-Based Compensation
As permitted by SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, the Company accounts for common stock options granted, and restricted stock sold, to employees, founders and directors using the intrinsic value method and, thus, recognizes no compensation expense for options granted, or restricted stock sold, with exercise prices equal to or greater than the fair value of the Companys common stock on the date of the grant. The Company has recorded deferred stock compensation related to certain stock options, and restricted stock, which were granted with exercise prices below estimated fair value, which is being amortized on an accelerated amortization methodology in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation Number 28.
Pro forma information regarding net loss is required by SFAS No. 123 and has been determined as if the Company had accounted for its employee stock options under the fair value method of that statement.
For purposes of adjusted pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the options is amortized to expense over the vesting period. The Companys adjusted pro forma information is as follows (in thousands except per share amounts):
Three months ended | ||||||||
March 30, 2003 | March 31, 2002 | |||||||
Net loss, as reported |
$ | (8,960 | ) | $ | (8,667 | ) | ||
Add: Stock-based employee compensation included in
reported net income, net of related tax effects |
865 | 1,225 | ||||||
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation
determined under fair value based method for
all awards, net of related tax effects |
(2,154 | ) | (2,068 | ) | ||||
Adjusted pro forma net loss |
$ | (10,249 | ) | $ | (9,510 | ) | ||
Adjusted pro forma basic and diluted net loss per share |
$ | (0.32 | ) | $ | (0.31 | ) | ||
The pro forma effect on net loss presented is not likely to be representative of the pro forma effects on reported net income or loss in future years because these amounts reflect less than five years of vesting.
Deferred compensation for options granted, and restricted stock sold, to consultants has been determined in accordance with SFAS No. 123 and Emerging Issues Task Force 96-18 as the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measured. Deferred charges for options granted, and restricted stock sold, to consultants are periodically remeasured as the underlying options vest.
8
ILLUMINA, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(Unaudited)
5. Comprehensive Income (Loss)
SFAS No. 130, Comprehensive Income, establishes rules for the reporting and disclosure of comprehensive income and its components. SFAS No. 130 requires the change in net unrealized gains or losses on marketable securities be included in comprehensive income. As adjusted, our comprehensive loss is as follows (in thousands):
Three months ended | ||||||||
March 30, 2003 | March 31, 2002 | |||||||
Net loss |
$ | (8,960 | ) | $ | (8,667 | ) | ||
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable
securities |
(153 | ) | (604 | ) | ||||
Comprehensive net loss |
$ | (9,113 | ) | $ | (9,271 | ) | ||
6. Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of standard cost (which approximates actual cost) or market. Inventory includes raw materials and finished goods that may be used in the research and development process and such items are expensed as consumed. The components of inventories are as follows:
March 30, | December 29, | |||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Raw materials |
$ | 1,389 | $ | 1,552 | ||||
Work in process |
561 | 407 | ||||||
Finished goods |
390 | 340 | ||||||
$ | 2,340 | $ | 2,299 | |||||
7. Collaborative Agreements
Applera Corporation
In November 1999, the Company entered into a joint development agreement with Applied Biosystems Group (Applied Biosystems), an operating group of Applera Corporation, under which the companies would jointly develop a SNP genotyping system that would combine the Companys BeadArray technology with Applied Biosystems assay chemistry and scanner technology. Under this agreement, the Company was primarily responsible for developing and manufacturing the arrays and Applied Biosystems was primarily responsible for developing and manufacturing the instruments, SNP assay reagents, and software and for marketing the system worldwide. In conjunction with the agreement, Applied Biosystems purchased 1,250,000 shares of Series C convertible preferred stock at $4.00 per share. In addition, Applied Biosystems agreed to provide the Company with non-refundable research and development support of
9
ILLUMINA, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(Unaudited)
$10,000,000, all of which was provided by December 2001. Upon commercialization of the system, the Company would share in the operating profits resulting from the sale of these systems. The Company has deferred recognition of revenue from the research funding of $10,000,000 provided by Applied Biosystems, and would recognize such amounts as revenue at the rate of 25% of the total profit share the Company earns from the sales of collaborative products, should such sales have occurred.
In July 2002, Applied Biosystems indicated that the planned mid-2002 launch of this genotyping system would be delayed a second time. This delay was related to Applied Biosystems inability to optimize and multiplex the SNP assay reagents. It is the Companys current belief that Applied Biosystems has no intention of continuing to develop a collaboration product with the Company and they have recently announced a competing product. As a result of the delay in developing the collaboration product, the Company launched its own production scale genotyping system in July 2002. In December 2002, Applied Biosystems filed a patent infringement suit against the Company in the Federal District Court in Northern California asserting infringement of several patents related to Applied Biosystems patented assay. Applied Biosystems did not serve the Company with its original complaint, but has since amended the complaint and served the Company in April 2003. Applied Biosystems is seeking a judgment granting it damages for infringement, treble damages alleging that such infringement is willful and a permanent injunction restraining the Company from the alleged infringement. Also in December 2002, Applied Biosystems sent a notification to the Company alleging that the Company had breached the joint development agreement entered into in November 1999 and seeking to compel arbitration pursuant to that agreement. This notification alleged that the Companys production-scale genotyping system and its consumables are collaboration products developed under the joint development agreement, that these products are being sold within the collaboration field described in that agreement, and that the Companys commercial activities with respect to its genotyping system are unlawful, unfair or fraudulent. Among other items, Applied Biosystems is seeking compensatory damages of $30,000,000, disgorgement of all revenues received from sales of its genotyping system or through its genotyping services product line and a prohibition of future sales of these products or services.
In December 2002, the Company filed a suit alleging breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unfair competition and other allegations against Applied Biosystems in San Diego Superior Court, and a motion for a temporary restraining order to prevent the arbitration of our joint development agreement sought by Applied Biosystems. The court granted the temporary restraining order. The Company then moved for a preliminary injunction to prevent the arbitration from proceeding, while Applied Biosystems brought a motion seeking to compel arbitration between the parties. In February 2003, the Company amended its complaint to additionally allege that the Company had been fraudulently induced by Applied Biosystems into entering into an agreement to arbitrate certain disputes by misrepresenting the purpose and intended effect of the arbitration provision of the joint development agreement. On February 18, 2003, the San Diego Superior Court granted the
10
ILLUMINA, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(Unaudited)
Companys motion for preliminary injunction and denied Applied Biosystems motion to compel arbitration without prejudice. Applied Biosystems subsequently moved to dismiss the claim of fraudulent inducement, and that motion was overruled. No trial date has been set for this case. The Company will continue to treat the $10,000,000 funding from Applied Biosystems as deferred revenue until the status of the collaboration agreement has been resolved.
The Company is in the early stages of proceedings to resolve the status of the collaboration agreement and the legal actions brought by both parties. The Company believes the claims alleged by Applied Biosystems are without merit in both the patent infringement case and their enjoined demand for arbitration and that the Company has a strong case regarding its allegations against Applied Biosystems. However, the Company cannot be sure that it will prevail in these matters. If the Company is unable to successfully defend against these allegations, it could result in a material adverse affect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.
Other Agreements
The Company has various agreements with several governmental and academic organizations for which the Company performs research or genotyping service activities. For example, the Company will receive $9 million from the National Institutes of Health to participate in the International HapMap Project.
8. Commitments and Long-Term Debt
In January 2002, the Company purchased two newly constructed buildings and assumed a $26 million, 10-year mortgage on the property at a fixed interest rate of 8.36%. The Company is required to make monthly payments of $208,974 representing interest and principal through February 2012 at which time a balloon payment of $21.2 million will be due. As of March 30, 2003 the carrying value of the Companys long-term debt approximates fair value.
In October 1998, the Company entered into a $1.0 million lease financing arrangement with a lease financing corporation. As of December 31, 1999, the Company had utilized all funds available under the lease arrangement. In April 2000, the Company entered into a $3.0 million loan arrangement to be used at its discretion to finance purchases of capital equipment. The loan is secured by the capital equipment financed. As of March 30, 2003, $1.7 million remains available under this loan arrangement.
9. Litigation Judgment
In June 2002, the Company recorded a $7.7 million charge to cover total damages and expenses incurred by the plaintiff related to a termination-of-employment lawsuit. The Company believes that the termination was lawful in all respects and that the verdict was unsupported by
11
ILLUMINA, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(Unaudited)
evidence presented at the trial. The Company plans to vigorously defend its position on appeal. A notice of appeal in this case was filed on October 10, 2002, and the appeal process is ongoing. During the appeal process, the court requires the Company to incur interest charges on the judgment amount at statutory rates until the case is resolved. In the three months ended March 30, 2003, the Company recorded litigation expense of $189,000 for interest.
As a result of the Companys decision to appeal the ruling, the Company filed a surety bond with the court equal to 1.5 times the judgment amount or approximately $11.3 million. Under the terms of the bond, the Company is required to maintain a letter of credit for 90% of the bond amount to secure the bond. Further, the Company was required to deposit approximately $12.5 million of marketable securities as collateral for the letter of credit and accordingly, these funds will be restricted from use for general corporate purposes until the appeal process is completed, which we expect will occur within 12 to 18 months. The Company has classified the restricted investments as current along with the accrued litigation judgment.
10. Effect of New Accounting Standards
In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure. SFAS No. 148 amends SFAS No. 123 Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, SFAS No. 148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. SFAS No. 148 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. The interim disclosure provisions are effective for financial reports containing financial statements for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2002. The Company has currently chosen to not adopt the voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. If the Company should choose to adopt such a method, its implementation pursuant to SFAS No. 148 could have a material effect on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In November 2002, the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force issued its consensus concerning Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables (EITF 00-21). EITF 00-21 addresses how to determine whether a revenue arrangement involving multiple deliverables should be divided into separate units of accounting, and, if separation is appropriate, how the arrangement consideration should be measured and allocated to the identified accounting units. EITF 00-21 is effective for revenue arrangements entered into in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2003. We do not anticipate that adoption of EITF 00-21 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
12
ILLUMINA, INC.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and accompanying notes included in this report and the financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 29, 2002 included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K. Operating results are not necessarily indicative of results that may occur in future periods.
The following discussion and analysis may contain forward-looking statements that involve risk and uncertainties, such as statements of our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. The cautionary statements made in this discussion and analysis should be read as applying to all related forward-looking statements wherever they appear in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed here. Factors that could cause or contribute to these differences include those discussed in Factors Affecting Operating Results below as well as those discussed elsewhere.
Overview
Illumina, Inc. was incorporated in April 1998. We are developing next-generation tools for the large-scale analysis of genetic variation and function. The information provided by these analyses will help enable the development of personalized medicine, a key goal of genomics and proteomics. Our proprietary BeadArray technology will provide the throughput, cost effectiveness and flexibility necessary to enable researchers in the life sciences and pharmaceutical industries to perform the billions of tests necessary to extract medically valuable information from advances in genomics. This information will correlate genetic variation and gene function with particular disease states, enhancing drug discovery, allowing diseases to be detected earlier and more specifically, and permitting better choices of drugs for individual patients. Our technology may also have applicability across a wide variety of industries beyond life sciences and pharmaceuticals, including agriculture, food, chemicals and petrochemicals. However, we do not currently expect that these markets will have the revenue potential of the life sciences market. In the first quarter of 2001, we began commercial sale of custom oligonucleotides manufactured using our proprietary Oligator technology. As a result of our favorable manufacturing cost structure, we have been able to implement a price leadership strategy in the plate-based segment of this market and have steadily been able to grow our market share. In the second quarter of 2001, we initiated our SNP genotyping services product line. As a result of the increasing market acceptance of our high throughput, low cost BeadArray technology, we have entered into significant contracts with many of the leading genotyping organizations including GlaxoSmithKline and The Sanger Centre, and have received a $9 million award from the National Institutes of Health to play a major role in the Human Haplotyping effort.
13
ILLUMINA, INC.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
In November 1999, we entered into a joint development agreement with Applied Biosystems under which the companies would jointly develop a SNP genotyping system that would combine our BeadArray technology with Applied Biosystems assay chemistry and scanner technology. Under this agreement, we were primarily responsible for developing and manufacturing the arrays and Applied Biosystems was primarily responsible for developing and manufacturing the instruments, SNP assay reagents, and software and for marketing the system worldwide. In conjunction with the agreement, Applied Biosystems purchased 1.25 million shares of Series C convertible preferred stock at $4.00 per share. In addition, Applied Biosystems agreed to provide us with non-refundable research and development support of $10 million, all of which was provided by December 2001. Upon commercialization of the system, we would have received a share of the operating profits from the sales of all components of these systems. We have deferred recognition of revenue from the research funding of $10 million provided by Applied Biosystems, and would recognize such amounts as revenue at the rate of 25% of the total profit share we earn from the sales of collaborative products, should such sales occur.
In July 2002, Applied Biosystems indicated that the planned mid-2002 launch of this genotyping system would be delayed a second time. This delay was related to Applied Biosystems inability to optimize and multiplex the SNP assay reagents. It is our current belief that Applied Biosystems has no intention of continuing to develop a collaboration product with us and they have recently announced a competing product. As a result of the delay in developing the collaboration product, we launched our own production-scale genotyping system in July 2002. In December 2002, Applied Biosystems filed a patent infringement suit against us in the Federal District Court in Northern California asserting infringement of several patents related to Applied Biosystems patented assay. Applied Biosystems did not serve us with its original complaint, but has since amended the complaint and served us in April 2003. Applied Biosystems is seeking a judgment granting it damages for infringement, treble damages alleging that such infringement is willful and a permanent injunction restraining us from the alleged infringement. Also in December 2002, Applied Biosystems sent a notification to us alleging that we had breached the joint development agreement entered into in November 1999 and seeking to compel arbitration pursuant to that agreement. This notification alleged that our production-scale genotyping system and our consumables are collaboration products developed under the joint development agreement, that these products are being sold within the collaboration field described in that agreement, and that our commercial activities with respect to its genotyping system are unlawful, unfair or fraudulent. Among other items, Applied Biosystems is seeking compensatory damages of $30 million, disgorgement of all revenues received from sales of our genotyping system or through our genotyping services product line and a prohibition of future sales of these products or services.
In December 2002, we filed a suit alleging breach of contract, breach of the
implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unfair competition and other
allegations against Applied Biosystems
in San Diego Superior Court, and a motion for a temporary restraining order to
prevent the arbitration of our joint development agreement sought by Applied
Biosystems. The
14
ILLUMINA, INC. court granted the temporary restraining order. We then moved for a preliminary
injunction to prevent the arbitration from proceeding, while Applied Biosystems
brought a motion seeking to compel arbitration between the parties. In
February 2003, we amended our complaint to additionally allege that we had been
fraudulently induced by Applied Biosystems into entering into an agreement to
arbitrate certain disputes by misrepresenting the purpose and intended effect
of the arbitration provision of the joint development agreement. On February
18, 2003, the San Diego Superior Court granted our motion for preliminary
injunction and denied Applied Biosystems motion to compel arbitration without
prejudice. Applied Biosystems subsequently moved to dismiss the claim of
fraudulent inducement and that motion was overruled. No trial date has been
set for this case. We will continue to treat the $10 million funding from
Applied Biosystems as deferred revenue until the status of the collaboration
agreement has been resolved.
We are in the early stages of proceedings to resolve the status of the
collaboration agreement and the legal actions brought by both parties. We
believe the claims alleged by Applied Biosystems are without merit in both the
patent infringement case and their enjoined demand for arbitration and that we
have a strong case regarding our allegations against Applied Biosystems.
However, we cannot be sure that we will prevail in these matters. If we are
unable to successfully defend against these allegations, it could result in a
material adverse affect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Our production-scale genotyping system is based on the system developed by
the Company that has been operational in our genotyping service product line
since 2001. In addition to our arrays, it includes the SherlockTM proprietary
confocal laser scanner, as well as the highly multiplexed GoldenGateTM SNP
genotyping assay. We do not believe that any of these product components are
covered by intellectual property held by Applied Biosystems or are otherwise
within the scope of the collaboration agreement with Applied Biosystems.
Consequently, we would retain all the operating profits, if any, generated
through the sales of systems and consumables rather than share profits under
the collaboration agreement. This system is initially being marketed to a
small number of high throughput genotyping users, however, over time, we will
need to develop lower throughput versions of the system, as well as additional
genetic analysis applications, which will be marketed more broadly and require
substantial increases in our sales and marketing expenses.
In March 2003, we completed the installation of and recorded revenue for
our first high-throughput SNP genotyping system. We have entered into one
additional genotyping system contract in 2003 and are seeking to expand our
customer base for these systems. However, we can give no assurance that our
sales efforts will be successful in developing a market for our systems.
A significant portion of our current revenue is derived from large,
individual transactions such as the sale of production genotyping systems or
genotyping services contracts. In addition, uncertain spending patterns in our
markets could adversely affect demand for some of our
15
ILLUMINA, INC. products over the coming quarters. Given the difficulty in predicting the
timing and magnitude of sales for our product offerings, we may experience some
quarter-to-quarter fluctuations in revenue during the year, including the
potential for an occasional sequential revenue decline.
We have incurred substantial operating losses since our inception. As of
March 30, 2003, our accumulated deficit was $99.4 million, and total
stockholders equity was $63.9 million. These losses have principally occurred
as a result of the substantial resources required for the research, development
and manufacturing scale up effort required to commercialize our products and
services, as well as charges of $8.1 million related to a
termination-of-employment lawsuit. We expect to continue to incur substantial
and increasing costs for research, development and manufacturing scale up
activities over the next several years. We will also need to significantly
increase our selling, general and administrative costs as we build up our sales
and marketing infrastructure to expand and support the sale of systems, other
products and services. As a result, we will need to increase revenue
significantly to achieve profitability.
Critical Accounting Policies
Revenue Recognition. We recognize revenue in accordance with the guidelines
established by SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 101. Under SAB 101,
revenue cannot be recorded until all of the following criteria have been met;
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; delivery has occurred or services
have been rendered; the sellers price to the buyer is fixed or determinable;
and collectibility is reasonably assured. Product revenue consists of sales of
oligonucleotides, arrays and genotyping systems. Revenue for oligonucleotide
and array sales is recognized generally upon shipment and transfer of title to
the customer. Genotyping system revenue is recognized when earned, which is
generally upon shipment, transfer of title to the customer and fulfillment of
contractually defined acceptance criteria. Reserves are provided for
anticipated warranty expenses at the time the associated revenue is recognized.
Revenue for genotyping services is recognized generally at the time the
genotyping analysis data is delivered to the customer. The Company has been
awarded $9 million from the National Institutes of Health to perform genotyping
services in connection with the International HapMap Project. In some cases,
revenue from this project is earned at the time the service activities are
performed rather than at the time data is delivered. Research revenue consists
of amounts earned under research agreements with collaborators and government
grants, which is recognized in the period during which the related costs are
incurred. All revenues are recorded net of any applicable allowances for
returns or discounts.
We had one significant collaborative agreement, under which we received
non-refundable research funding support of $10.0 million from Applied
Biosystems through the end of 2001. All amounts received under that agreement
were recorded as deferred revenue in accordance with SAB 101. We will continue
to reflect these payments as deferred revenue until the legal status of our
collaborative agreement has been resolved.
16
ILLUMINA, INC. Cash & Investments. We invest our excess cash balances in marketable debt
securities, primarily government securities and corporate bonds and notes, with
strong credit ratings. We classify our investments as Available-for-Sale
under SFAS 115 and record such investments at the estimated fair value in the
balance sheet, with gains and losses, if any, reported in stockholders equity.
We periodically review our investments for other than temporary impairment.
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended March 30, 2003 and March 31, 2002
Revenue
Revenue for the three months ended March 30, 2003 and March 31, 2002 was
$4.3 million and $1.3 million, respectively. Product revenue increased to $1.4
million in the three months ended March 30, 2003 from $0.5 million in the three
months ended March 31, 2002, due primarily to the first sale of our SNP
genotyping system. SNP genotyping service revenue was $1.9 million in the three
months ended March 30, 2003. We had no SNP genotyping service revenue in the
three months ended March 31, 2002 as that product line was just beginning to be
commercialized. Government grants and other research funding was $1.0 million
and $0.7 million for the three months ended March 30, 2003 and March 31, 2002,
respectively. We expect grant revenue to generally decline as a proportion of
total revenue over the next few years as product and service revenue become a
more important part of our business.
Cost of Revenue
Cost of product and service revenue for the three months ended March 30,
2003 and March 31, 2002 was $1.9 million and $0.3 million, respectively. The
increase was driven by increased sales of products and services. Gross margins
on product and service revenues were 42% in the three months ended March 30,
2003, versus 37% in the three months ended March 31, 2002, due primarily to
higher sales of SNP genotyping services. Costs related to research revenue is
included in research and development expense.
Research and Development
Our research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and
other personnel-related expenses, facility costs and laboratory and
manufacturing supplies. Total research and development expenses decreased $1.4
million to $5.7 million for the three months ended March 30, 2003, from $7.1
million for the three months ended March 31, 2002. During the three months
ended March 30, 2003, the research expense to support our BeadArray activities
decreased $0.9 million as compared to the same period in 2002. The decline is
partially
attributed to the reduction in development expense that has occurred as a
result of commercializing our production-scale genotyping system. In addition,
as we increase our
17
ILLUMINA, INC. BeadArray-driven product sales, a smaller portion of our manufacturing
resources are now used to support research efforts as compared to the first
quarter of 2002. Research to support our Oligator technology platform
decreased $0.5 million during the three months ended March 30, 2003, as
compared to the three months ended March 31, 2002. This decline is related to
a major upgrade of our Oligator technology that occurred in the first quarter
of 2002, which resulted in a significant increase in our manufacturing
capacity. We expect that our research and development expenses, including
facilities related costs, will increase moderately over the next 12 months.
Selling, General and Administrative
Our selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of
personnel costs for sales and marketing, finance, human resources, business
development and general management, as well as professional fees, such as
expenses for legal and accounting services. Selling, general and administrative
expenses increased $3.0 million to $4.6 million for the three months ended
March 30, 2003, from $1.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2002.
This increase is due primarily to higher legal expenses related to a
termination-of-employment lawsuit and the legal proceedings regarding our
former SNP genotyping partner, as well as higher expenses related to securing
worldwide patents. The remaining increase is due to increases in the sales and
marketing costs required to expand and support our custom oligonucleotide sales
and SNP genotyping services operations. During the third and fourth quarters of
2002 we began our sales and marketing expansion into Europe and in early 2003,
we began our expansion into Japan. We expect that our selling, general and
administrative expenses will accelerate as we expand our staff, add sales and
marketing infrastructure and incur additional costs to support the
commercialization of our products.
Amortization of Deferred Compensation and Other Non-Cash Compensation Charges
From our inception through July 27, 2000, in connection with the grant of
certain stock options and sales of restricted stock to employees, founders and
directors, we have recorded deferred stock compensation totaling $17.7 million,
representing the difference between the exercise or purchase price and the fair
value of our common stock as estimated for financial reporting purposes on the
date such stock options were granted or such restricted stock was sold. We
recorded this amount as a component of stockholders equity and amortize the
amount as a charge to operations over the vesting period of the restricted
stock and options.
We recognize compensation expense over the vesting period for employees,
founders and directors, using an accelerated amortization methodology in
accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 28.
For consultants, deferred compensation is recorded at the fair value for the
options granted or stock sold in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123 and is periodically re-measured and expensed in
accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force No. 96-18.
18
ILLUMINA, INC. We recorded amortization of deferred compensation of $0.9 million and $1.2
million for the three months ended March 30, 2003 and March 31, 2002,
respectively. Subsequent to July 27, 2000, no deferred compensation has been
recorded as all options have been granted at fair market value.
Litigation Judgment
A $7.7 million charge was recorded in June 2002 to cover total damages and
expenses incurred by the plaintiff related to a termination-of-employment
lawsuit. We believe that the termination was lawful in all respects and that
the verdict was unsupported by evidence presented at the trial. We plan to
vigorously defend our position on appeal. A notice of appeal in this case was
filed on October 10, 2002, and the appeal process is ongoing. During the
appeal process, the court requires us to incur interest charges on the judgment
amount at statutory rates until the case is resolved. In the three months
ended March 30, 2003, we recorded litigation expense of $189,000 for interest.
Interest Income
Interest income on our cash and cash equivalents and investments was $0.6
million and $0.9 million for the three months ended March 30, 2003 and March
31, 2002, respectively. Interest income decreased in 2003 due to lower average
levels of invested funds and lower effective interest rates.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $0.6 million for both the three months ended March
30, 2003 and March 31, 2002. Interest expense relates primarily to a $26.0
million loan related to the purchase of our new facility during the first
quarter of 2002.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of March 30, 2003, we had cash, cash equivalents and investments
(including restricted cash and investments) of approximately $60.4 million. We
currently invest our funds in U.S. dollar based investment-grade corporate and
government debt securities with average maturities of approximately 18 months.
Our operating activities used cash of $5.0 million in the three months ended
March 30, 2003, as compared to $6.6 million in the three months ended March 31,
2002. The decrease in cash used for operating activities was due primarily to
an increase in our accounts payable and accrued liabilities.
19
ILLUMINA, INC. Our investing activities provided cash of $7.6 million in the three months
ended March 30, 2003 as compared to cash used of $13.4 million in the three
months ended March 31, 2002. Cash provided in investing activities in the
three months ended March 30, 2003 was due primarily to the maturities of
investment securities, while cash used in the three months ended March 31, 2002
was due primarily to the purchase of a new facility.
Our financing activities provided cash of $0.2 million in the three months
ended March 30, 2003 as compared to $26.3 million in the three months ended
March 31, 2002. Cash provided by financing activities in the three months ended
March 31, 2002 resulted primarily from $26.0 million in loan proceeds related
to the purchase of our new facility.
In October 1998, we entered into a $1.0 million capital equipment lease
financing arrangement with a lease financing corporation. As of December 31,
1999, we had utilized all funds available under this lease agreement. In April
2000, we entered into a $3.0 million loan arrangement to be used at our
discretion to finance purchases of capital equipment, $1.7 million of which
remains available at March 30, 2003.
In January 2002, we purchased two newly constructed buildings and assumed
a $26.0 million, 10-year mortgage on the property at a fixed interest rate of
8.36% which calls for principal and interest payments of approximately $2.5
million per year until the loan expires in January 2012 at which time a balloon
payment of $21.2 million will be due.
In June 2002, we recorded a $7.7 million charge to cover total damages and
estimated expenses related to a termination-of-employment lawsuit. As a result
of the Companys decision to appeal the ruling, we filed a surety bond with the
court on October 25, 2002 of 1.5 times the judgment amount, or approximately
$11.3 million. Under the terms of the bond, we are required to maintain a
letter of credit for 90% of the bond amount to secure the bond. Further, the
Company was required to deposit approximately $12.5 million of marketable
securities as collateral for the letter of credit and accordingly, these funds
will be restricted from use for corporate purposes until the appeal process is
completed, which we expect will occur within 12 to 18 months.
We expect that our current cash and cash equivalents, investments and
funding from existing strategic alliances and grants will be sufficient to fund
our anticipated operating needs for at least 18 to 24 months. However, our
future capital requirements and the adequacy of our available funds will depend
on many factors, including our ability to successfully commercialize our SNP
genotyping laboratory and extensions to that product and to expand our
oligonucleotide and SNP genotyping services product lines, scientific progress
in our research and development programs, the magnitude of those programs,
competing technological and market developments, the successful resolution of
our legal proceedings with Applied Biosystems and the successful
resolution of our appeal in a termination of employment lawsuit.
Therefore, we may require additional funding within this time frame and the
additional funding, if needed, may not be
20
ILLUMINA, INC. available on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all. Further, any
additional equity financing may be dilutive to our then existing stockholders
and may adversely affect their rights.
Factors Affecting Our Operating Results
In addition to the items mentioned above, the following issues could
adversely affect our operating results or our stock price.
We have generated only a small amount of revenue from product and service
offerings to date. We expect to continue to incur net losses and we may not
achieve or maintain profitability.
We have incurred net losses since our inception and expect to continue to
incur net losses. At March 30, 2003, our accumulated deficit was approximately
$99.4 million, and we incurred a net loss of $9.0 million for the three months
ended March 30, 2003. We expect to continue to incur net losses and negative
cash flow for the foreseeable future. The magnitude of our net losses will
depend, in part, on the rate of growth, if any, of our revenue and on the level
of our expenses. We expect to continue incurring significant expenses for
research and development, for developing our manufacturing capabilities and for
sales and marketing efforts to commercialize our products. In addition, we
expect that our selling and marketing expenses will increase at a higher rate
in the future as a result of the launch of our SNP genotyping system. As a
result, we expect that our operating expenses will increase significantly as we
grow and, consequently, we will need to generate significant additional revenue
to achieve profitability. Even if we achieve profitability, we may not be able
to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis.
Our success depends upon the increasing availability of genetic information and
the continued emergence and growth of markets for analysis of genetic variation
and function.
We design our products primarily for applications in the life sciences and
pharmaceutical industries. The usefulness of our technology depends in part
upon the availability of genetic data and its usefulness in identifying or
treating disease. We are initially focusing on markets for analysis of genetic
variation and function, namely SNP genotyping, gene expression profiling and
proteomics. These markets are new and emerging, and they may not develop as
quickly as we anticipate, or reach their full potential. Other methods of
analysis of genetic variation and function may emerge and displace the methods
we are developing. Also, researchers may not seek or be able to convert raw
genetic data into medically valuable information through the analysis of
genetic variation and function. If useful genetic data is not available or if
our target markets do not develop in a timely manner, demand for our products
may grow at a slower rate than we expect, and we may never become profitable.
21
ILLUMINA, INC. We are an early stage company with a limited history of commercial sales of
microarray and scanning instrument products, and our success depends on our
ability to develop commercially successful products and on market acceptance of
our new and unproven technology.
We may not possess all of the resources, capability and intellectual
property necessary to develop and commercialize all the products or services
that may result from our technologies. We only recently sold our first
genotyping system, and our technologies are in the early stages of
commercialization or are still in development. You should evaluate us in light
of the uncertainties and complexities affecting an early stage company
developing tools for the life sciences and pharmaceutical industries. We must
conduct a substantial amount of additional research and development before some
of our products will be ready for sale. In addition, we are only at the early
phase of offering custom oligonucleotides and SNP genotyping services.
Problems frequently encountered in connection with the development or early
commercialization of products and services using new and unproven technologies
might limit our ability to develop and successfully commercialize these
products and services. In addition, we may need to enter into agreements to
obtain intellectual property necessary to commercialize some of our products or
services.
Historically, life sciences and pharmaceutical companies have analyzed
genetic variation and function using a variety of technologies. Compared to the
existing technologies, our technologies are new and unproven. In order to be
successful, our products must meet the commercial requirements of the life
sciences and pharmaceutical industries as tools for the large-scale analysis of
genetic variation and function.
Market acceptance will depend on many factors, including:
We have limited experience in manufacturing commercial products and services.
If we are unable to develop our manufacturing capability or find third-party
manufacturers to
manufacture our products, we may not be able to launch or support our products
in a timely manner, or at all.
22
ILLUMINA, INC. We have limited experience manufacturing our products in the volumes that
will be necessary for us to achieve significant commercial sales. To date, our
manufacturing activities for arrays have been limited to supplying
pre-commercial products for internal use and to support our SNP genotyping
services product line. We have only recently begun manufacturing
oligonucleotides for commercial sale and operating our internal SNP genotyping
service product line. We are still in the process of establishing and
optimizing our commercial manufacturing process for the scanning instrument
that is part of our SNP genotyping system. We have encountered and may in the
future encounter difficulties in manufacturing these products which could impact our ability to sell these
products, may not be able to produce them economically, may fail to achieve expected performance levels or may have to set
prices that hinder wide adoption by customers. We currently possess only one
facility capable of manufacturing our products and services for both sale to
our customers and internal use. If a natural disaster were to significantly
damage our facility or if other events were to cause our operations to fail,
these events could prevent us from developing and manufacturing our products
and services.
The nature of our products requires customized components that currently
are available from a limited number of sources. For example, we currently
obtain the fiber optic bundles included in our products from a single source.
If we are unable to secure a sufficient supply of fiber optic bundles or other
product components, we will be unable to meet demand for our products. We will
need to enter into contractual relationships with manufacturers for
commercial-scale production of our products, or develop these capabilities
internally, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to do this on a
timely basis, for sufficient quantities or on commercially reasonable terms.
Accordingly, we may not be able to establish or maintain reliable, high-volume
manufacturing at commercially reasonable costs.
Our current sales, marketing and technical support organization may limit our
ability to sell our products.
We currently have limited sales and marketing and technical support
services and have only recently established a small direct sales force and
customer support team. In order to effectively commercialize our genotyping
system and other products to follow, we will need to expand our sales,
marketing and technical support staff both domestically and internationally.
We may not be successful in establishing or maintaining either a direct sales
force or distribution arrangements to market our products and services. In
addition, the efforts from a limited sales and marketing force may not be
sufficient to build the market acceptance required to support continued growth
of our business.
We may encounter difficulties in managing our growth. These difficulties could
increase our losses.
We expect to experience rapid and substantial growth in order to achieve
our operating plans, which will place a strain on our human and capital
resources. If we are unable to manage
23
ILLUMINA, INC. this growth effectively, our losses could increase. Our ability to manage our
operations and growth effectively requires us to continue to expend funds to
enhance our operational, financial and management controls, reporting systems
and procedures and to attract and retain sufficient numbers of talented
employees. If we are unable to scale up and implement improvements to our
manufacturing process and control systems in an efficient or timely manner, or
if we encounter deficiencies in existing systems and controls, then we will not
be able to make available the products required to successfully commercialize
our technology. Failure to attract and retain sufficient numbers of talented
employees will further strain our human resources and could impede our growth.
Any inability to adequately protect our proprietary technologies could harm our
competitive position.
Our success will depend in part on our ability to obtain patents and
maintain adequate protection of our intellectual property in the United States
and other countries. If we do not protect our intellectual property adequately,
competitors may be able to use our technologies and thereby erode our
competitive advantage. The laws of some foreign countries do not protect
proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States, and
many companies have encountered significant problems in protecting their
proprietary rights abroad. These problems can be caused by the absence of rules
and methods for defending intellectual property rights.
The patent positions of companies developing tools for the life sciences
and pharmaceutical industries, including our patent position, generally are
uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions. We will be able to
protect our proprietary rights from unauthorized use by third parties only to
the extent that our proprietary technologies are covered by valid and
enforceable patents or are effectively maintained as trade secrets. We will
apply for patents covering our technologies and products, as we deem
appropriate. However, our applications may be challenged and may not result in
issued patents. Our existing patents and any future patents we obtain may not
be sufficiently broad to prevent others from practicing our technologies or
from developing competing products. There also is risk that others may
independently develop similar or alternative technologies or design around our
patented technologies.
In April 2003, Applied Biosystems served us with an amended complaint
alleging patent infringement, asserting that our GoldenGate assay infringes
several patents related to an Applied Biosystems assay method. Others may
challenge or invalidate our patents or claim that we infringe the rights of
third party patents. Also, our patents may fail to provide us with any
competitive advantage. We may need to initiate additional lawsuits to protect
or enforce our patents, or litigate against third party claims, which would be
expensive and, if we lose, may cause us to lose some of our intellectual
property rights and reduce our ability to compete in the marketplace.
24
ILLUMINA, INC. We also rely upon trade secret protection for our confidential and
proprietary information. We have taken security measures to protect our
proprietary information. These measures, however, may not provide adequate
protection for our trade secrets or other proprietary information. We seek to
protect our proprietary information by entering into confidentiality agreements
with employees, collaborators and consultants. Nevertheless, employees,
collaborators or consultants may still disclose our proprietary information,
and we may not be able to meaningfully protect our trade secrets. In addition,
others may independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary
information or techniques or otherwise gain access to our trade secrets.
Litigation or other proceedings or third party claims of intellectual property
infringement could require us to spend significant time and money and could
prevent us from selling our products or services.
Our commercial success depends in part on our non-infringement of the
patents or proprietary rights of third parties and the ability to protect our
own intellectual property. Applied Biosystems has served us with an amended
complaint alleging patent infringement and other third parties have or may
assert that we are employing their proprietary technology without
authorization. In addition, third parties have or may obtain patents in the
future and claim that use of our technologies infringes these patents. We could
incur substantial costs and divert the attention of our management and
technical personnel in defending ourselves against any of these claims. We may
incur the same costs and diversions in enforcing our patents against others.
Furthermore, parties making claims against us may be able to obtain injunctive
or other relief, which effectively could block our ability to further develop,
commercialize and sell products, and could result in the award of substantial
damages against us. In the event of a successful claim of infringement against
us, we may be required to pay damages and obtain one or more licenses from
third parties. We may not be able to obtain these licenses at a reasonable
cost, or at all. In that event, we could encounter delays in product
introductions while we attempt to develop alternative methods or products.
Defense of any lawsuit or failure to obtain any of these licenses could prevent
us from commercializing available products.
We expect intense competition in our target markets, which could render our
products obsolete or substantially limit the volume of products that we sell.
This would limit our ability to compete and achieve profitability. If we cannot
continuously develop and commercialize new products, our revenues may not grow
as intended.
We compete with life sciences companies that design, manufacture and
market instruments for analysis of genetic variation and function and other
applications using technologies such as two-dimensional electrophoresis,
capillary electrophoresis, mass spectrometry, flow cytometry, microfluidics,
and mechanically deposited, inkjet and
photolithographic arrays. We anticipate that we will face increased
competition in the future as new companies enter the market with new
technologies. The markets for our products are
25
ILLUMINA, INC. characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards,
changes in customer needs, emerging competition and new product introductions.
One or more of our competitors may render our technology obsolete or
uneconomical. Many of our competitors have greater financial and personnel
resources and more experience in research and development than we have.
Furthermore, the life sciences and pharmaceutical companies, which are our
potential customers and strategic partners, could develop competing products.
If we are unable to develop enhancements to our technology and rapidly deploy
new product offerings, our business, financial condition and results of
operations will suffer.
We may need additional capital in the future. If additional capital is not
available on acceptable terms, we may have to curtail or cease operations.
Our future capital requirements will be substantial and will depend on
many factors including our ability to successfully market our genetic analysis
systems and services, the need for capital expenditures to support and expand
our business, the progress and scope of our collaborative and independent
research and development projects, the filing, prosecution and enforcement of
patent claims and the success of our legal proceedings with Applied Biosystems
and the appeal of a wrongful termination lawsuit. We anticipate that our
existing capital resources will enable us to maintain currently planned
operations for at least 18 to 24 months. However, we premise this expectation
on our current operating plan, which may change as a result of many factors.
Consequently, we may need additional funding sooner than anticipated. Our
inability to raise capital would seriously harm our business and product
development efforts. In addition, we may choose to raise additional capital due
to market conditions or strategic considerations even if we believe we have
sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans. To the extent that
additional capital is raised through the sale of equity or convertible debt
securities, the issuance of these securities could result in dilution to our
stockholders.
We currently have no credit facility or committed sources of capital other
than an equipment lease line with $1.7 million unused and available as of March
30, 2003. To the extent operating and capital resources are insufficient to
meet future requirements; we will have to raise additional funds to continue
the development and commercialization of our technologies. These funds may not
be available on favorable terms, or at all. If adequate funds are not available
on attractive terms, we may be required to curtail operations significantly or
to obtain funds by entering into financing, supply or collaboration agreements
on unattractive terms.
If we lose our key personnel or are unable to attract and retain additional
personnel, we may be unable to achieve our goals.
We are highly dependent on our management and scientific personnel. The
loss of their services could adversely impact our ability to achieve our
business objectives. We will need to
hire additional qualified personnel with expertise in molecular biology,
chemistry, biological information processing, sales, marketing and technical
support. We compete for qualified
26
ILLUMINA, INC. management and scientific personnel with other biotechnology companies,
universities and research institutions, particularly those focusing on
genomics. Competition for these individuals, particularly in the San Diego
area, is intense, and the turnover rate can be high. Failure to attract and
retain management and scientific personnel would prevent us from pursuing
collaborations or developing our products or technologies.
Our planned activities will require additional expertise in specific
industries and areas applicable to the products developed through our
technologies, including the life sciences and healthcare industries. Thus, we
will need to add new personnel, including management, and develop the expertise
of existing management. The failure to do so could impair the growth of our
business.
We expect that our results of operations will fluctuate. This fluctuation could
cause our stock price to decline.
Our operating results have fluctuated in the past and are likely to do so
in the future. These fluctuations in our operating results could cause our
stock price to fluctuate significantly or decline. A large portion of our
expenses is relatively fixed, including expenses for facilities, equipment and
personnel. In addition, we expect operating expenses to continue to increase
significantly. Accordingly, if revenue does not grow as anticipated, we may
not be able to reduce our operating losses.
Due to the possibility of fluctuations in our revenue and expenses, we
believe that quarterly comparisons of our operating results are not a good
indication of our future performance. A significant portion of our current
revenue is derived from large, individual transactions such as the sale of
production genotyping systems or genotyping services contracts. In addition,
uncertain spending patterns in our markets could adversely affect demand for
some of our products over the coming quarters. Given the difficulty in
predicting the timing and magnitude of sales for our product offerings, we may
experience some quarter-to-quarter fluctuations in revenue during the year,
including the potential for an occasional sequential revenue decline.
Furthermore, our operating results may not meet the expectations of stock
market analysts and investors. In that case, our stock price probably would
decline.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates
primarily to our investment portfolio. The fair market value of fixed rate
securities may be adversely impacted by fluctuations in interest rates while
income earned on floating rate securities may decline as a result of decreases
in interest rates. Under our current policies, we do not use interest rate
derivative instruments to manage exposure to interest rate changes. We ensure
the safety and
preservation of our invested principal funds by limiting default risk,
market risk and reinvestment risk. We mitigate default risk by investing in
investment grade securities. A hypothetical 100
27
ILLUMINA, INC. basis point adverse move in interest rates along the entire interest rate
yield curve would not materially affect the fair value of our interest
sensitive financial instruments.
Our equipment financings, amounting to $0.5 million as of March 30, 2003,
are all at fixed rates and therefore, have no exposure to changes in interest
rates. In January 2002, we assumed a $26.0 million mortgage in connection with
the purchase of a new facility and related land. The interest rate on this
loan is fixed for a 10-year period and consequently there is no exposure to
increasing market interest rates.
We have operated primarily in the United States; we began our sales and
marketing expansion into Europe in the third quarter of 2002 and into Asia in
the first quarter of 2003. Other than employment related expenses for our
European and Asian sales personnel, virtually all transactions to date have
been made in U.S. dollars. Accordingly, we have not had any significant
exposure to foreign currency rate fluctuations, nor do we have any foreign
currency hedging instruments in place.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
We have established and maintain disclosure controls and procedures to
ensure that we record, process, summarize, and report information we are
required to disclose in our periodic reports filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission in the manner and within the time periods specified in the
SECs rules and forms. We also design our disclosure controls to ensure that
the information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including
the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer, as appropriate to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. We also maintain internal
controls and procedures to ensure that we comply with applicable laws and our
established financial policies. We design our internal controls to provide
reasonable assurance that (1) our transactions are properly authorized; (2) our
assets are safeguarded against unauthorized or improper use; and (3) our
transactions are properly recorded and reported in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States.
We have evaluated the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures to determine whether they are effective in ensuring that the
disclosure of required information is timely made in accordance with the
Exchange Act and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission. This evaluation was made under the supervision and with the
participation of management, including our chief executive officer and chief
financial officer within the 90-day period prior to the filing of this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Our management does not expect that our
disclosure controls or our internal controls will prevent all errors and all
fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide
only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control
system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact
that there are resource constraints,
and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs.
Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of
controls can provide absolute assurance that
28
ILLUMINA, INC. all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These
inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making
can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or
mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of
some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of
the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon
certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no
assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all
potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a
cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur
and not be detected. Notwithstanding, we have designed our internal control
system with a level of controls that we believe will prevent material errors or
instances of fraud in our consolidated financial statements.
The chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded,
based on their review, that our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined
at Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c), are effective to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms and
that our internal controls are effective to provide reasonable assurance that
our financial statements are fairly presented in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. No significant changes were
made to our internal controls or other factors that could significantly affect
these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation.
29
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
In March 2001, a complaint seeking damages of an unspecified amount was
filed against us by a former employee in the Superior Court of the State of
California in connection with the employees termination of employment with
Illumina. In July 2002 a California Superior Court judgment was rendered
against the Company and we recorded a $7.7 million charge in our financial
results for the second quarter of 2002 to cover total damages and expenses
incurred by the plaintiff. We believe that the termination was lawful in all
respects and that the verdict was unsupported by evidence presented at the
trial. A notice of appeal in this case was filed on October 10, 2002, and the
appeal process is ongoing. We are also recording interest expense on the $7.7
million during the appeal based on the statutory rate.
In December 2002, Applied Biosystems Group filed a patent infringement
suit against Illumina in the Federal District Court in Northern California
asserting infringement of several patents related to an Applied Biosystems
assay intended for use in our collaboration. In April 2003, Applied Biosystems
served us with an amended complaint alleging patent infringement. In that
complaint, Applied Biosystems is seeking a judgment granting it damages for
infringement, treble damages alleging that such infringement is willful and a
permanent injunction restraining us from the alleged infringement. Also in
December 2002, Applied Biosystems sent a notification to us alleging that we
had breached the joint development agreement between Illumina and Applied
Biosystems entered into in November 1999 and seeking to compel arbitration
pursuant to that agreement. This notification alleges that our production-scale
genotyping system and our consumables are collaboration products developed
under the joint development agreement, that these products are being sold
within the collaboration field described in that agreement, and that our
commercial activities with respect to our genotyping system are unlawful,
unfair or fraudulent. Among other relief it sought via an arbitration
proceeding, Applied Biosystems sought compensatory damages of $30 million,
disgorgement of all revenues received from sales of our genotyping system or
through our genotyping services product line and a prohibition of future sales
of these products or services. We responded in a letter notification dated
December 4, 2002 to Applied Biosystems that Applied Biosystems was in breach of
the joint development agreement, having twice delayed the launch of our
collaborative product, and despite our continual compliance with our
obligations under this agreement, and further disputing that the arbitration
proceeding was appropriate.
On December 11, 2002, we filed a suit alleging breach of contract, breach
of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unfair competition and
other allegations against Applied Biosystems in San Diego Superior Court, and a
motion for a temporary restraining order to prevent the arbitration of our
joint development agreement sought by Applied Biosystems. The court granted
our temporary restraining order on December 12, 2002. We then moved for a
preliminary injunction to prevent the arbitration from proceeding until a trial
in the superior court case, while Applied Biosystems brought a motion seeking
to dismiss this Superior Court action and to compel arbitration between the
parties. In February 2003, we amended our complaint to
30
additionally allege that we had been fraudulently induced by Applied Biosystems
into entering into an agreement to arbitrate certain disputes by
misrepresenting the purpose and intended effect of the arbitration provision of
the 1999 joint development agreement. On February 18, 2003, the San Diego
Superior Court granted our motion for preliminary injunction to prevent the
arbitration process and denied Applied Biosystems motion to compel arbitration
without prejudice. Applied Biosystems subsequently moved to dismiss the claim
of fraudulent inducement, and that motion was overruled. No trial date has
been set for this case.
We believe the claims alleged by Applied Biosystems are without merit in
both the patent infringement case and their enjoined demand for arbitration,
and that we have a strong case regarding our breach of contract and other
related allegations against Applied Biosystems. However, we cannot be sure that
we will prevail in these matters. If we are unable to successfully defend
against these allegations, it could result in a material adverse affect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are not currently a party to any other material legal proceedings.
From time to time, we may be involved in litigation relating to claims arising
out of our operations in the usual course of business.
Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds
On July 27, 2000, we commenced our initial public offering pursuant to a
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-33922) resulting in net
offering proceeds of $101.3 million. We will continue to use proceeds from our
initial public offering to fund operations. Through March 30, 2003, we have
used approximately $18.8 million to purchase property, plant and equipment and
approximately $23.9 million to fund general operating expenses. The remaining
balance is invested in a variety of interest-bearing instruments including U.S.
Treasury securities, corporate debt securities and money market accounts.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
None.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.
31
Table of Contents
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Table of Contents
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Table of Contents
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Table of Contents
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Table of Contents
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Table of Contents
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Table of Contents
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Table of Contents
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
our ability to demonstrate to potential customers the benefits and
cost effectiveness of our products and services relative to others
available in the market;
the extent and effectiveness of our efforts to market, sell and
distribute our products;
our ability to manufacture products in sufficient quantities with
acceptable quality and reliability and at an acceptable cost; and
the willingness and ability of customers to adopt new technologies
requiring capital investments.
Table of Contents
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Table of Contents
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Table of Contents
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Table of Contents
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Table of Contents
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Table of Contents
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Table of Contents
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
(a)
Exhibits.
Table of Contents
Exhibit Number | Description of Document | ||
99.1 | Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
(b) | Reports on Form 8-K |
Report on Form 8-K filed on April 25, 2003 for press release dated April 23, 2003 announcing Illumina Inc.s financial results for the quarter ended March 30, 2003.
32
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Illumina, Inc. | ||
|
||
(Registrant) | ||
Date: May 6, 2003 | /s/ Timothy Kish | |
|
||
Timothy Kish Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
33
CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Jay T. Flatley, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Illumina, Inc.; | ||
2. | Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; | ||
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; | ||
4. | The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: |
a) | designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; | ||
b) | evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and | ||
c) | presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; |
5. | The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): |
a) | all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and | ||
b) | any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have significant role in the registrants internal controls; and |
6. | The registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most |
34
recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. |
Dated: May 6, 2003 | ||
/s/ JAY T. FLATLEY | ||
|
||
Jay T. Flatley President and Chief Executive Officer |
35
I, Timothy M. Kish, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Illumina, Inc.; | ||
2. | Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; | ||
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; | ||
4. | The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: |
a) | designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; | ||
b) | evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and | ||
c) | presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; |
5. | The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): |
a) | all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and | ||
b) | any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have significant role in the registrants internal controls; and |
6. | The registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most |
36
recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. |
Dated: May 6, 2003 | ||
/s/ TIMOTHY M. KISH | ||
|
||
Timothy M. Kish Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
37