Back to GetFilings.com



Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

[X]  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002

OR

[   ]  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number: 000-26125

RUBIO’S RESTAURANTS, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
     
DELAWARE
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
  33-0100303
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

1902 WRIGHT PLACE, SUITE 300, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(760) 929-8226
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

(1) Yes   [X]     No   [   ]
(2) Yes   [X]     No   [   ]

As of August 1, 2002 there were 9,052,258 shares of the Registrant’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, outstanding.



1


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS — UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS — UNAUDITED
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — UNAUDITED
Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Item 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Item 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Item 5. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
SIGNATURES
EXHIBIT 10.1
EXHIBIT 10.2
EXHIBIT 10.3
EXHIBIT 99.1


Table of Contents

RUBIO’S RESTAURANTS, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
                 
            Page
           
PART I
 
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
       
Item 1.
 
Financial Statements
       
       
Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2002 (unaudited) and December 30, 2001
    3  
       
Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the thirteen weeks ended June 30, 2002 and July 1, 2001 and the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2002 and July 1, 2001
    4  
       
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2002 and July 1, 2001
    5  
       
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
    6  
Item 2.
 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
    11  
Item 3.
 
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
    26  
PART II.
 
OTHER INFORMATION
       
Item 1.
 
Legal Proceedings
    27  
Item 2.
 
Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds
    27  
Item 3.
 
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
    27  
Item 4.
 
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
    27  
Item 5.
 
Other Information
    28  
Item 6.
 
Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
    28  
       
Signatures
    29  

2


Table of Contents

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

RUBIO’S RESTAURANTS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
                         
            June 30,   December 30,
            2002   2001
           
 
            (unaudited)   (see Note)
ASSETS
               
CURRENT ASSETS:
               
 
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 7,302     $ 4,710  
 
Short-term investments
    1,994       1,302  
 
Income taxes receivable
          798  
 
Other receivables
    515       673  
 
Inventory
    1,059       1,453  
 
Prepaid expenses
    1,963       736  
 
 
   
     
 
   
Total current assets
    12,833       9,672  
 
INVESTMENTS
          367  
PROPERTY — NET
    34,880       35,911  
OTHER ASSETS
    301       353  
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
    3,447       4,346  
 
   
     
 
TOTAL
  $ 51,461     $ 50,649  
 
   
     
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
               
 
Accounts payable
  $ 1,690     $ 3,005  
 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
    4,215       3,634  
 
Store closure reserve
    1,280       1,496  
 
Line of credit
    1,000       1,000  
 
Income taxes payable
    267        
 
Deferred income taxes
    211       214  
 
   
     
 
   
Total current liabilities
    8,663       9,349  
 
STORE CLOSURE RESERVE
    2,376       2,981  
DEFERRED RENT
    1,781       1,608  
DEFERRED FRANCHISE REVENUE
    59       87  
 
   
     
 
   
Total liabilities
    12,879       14,025  
 
   
     
 
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (NOTE 5)
               
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
               
 
Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding
           
 
Common stock, $.001 par value, 75,000,000 shares authorized, 9,023,134 issued and outstanding in 2002, and 8,922,786 issued and outstanding in 2001
    9       9  
 
Paid-in capital
    41,659       41,441  
 
Deferred compensation
    407       217  
 
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    1       6  
 
Accumulated deficit
    (3,494 )     (5,049 )
 
   
     
 
   
Total stockholders’ equity
    38,582       36,624  
 
   
     
 
TOTAL
  $ 51,461     $ 50,649  
 
   
     
 

Note: The balance sheet as of December 30, 2001 is derived from audited consolidated financial statements and is in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Entire notes for the audited period are not included in this report.

See notes to consolidated financial statements-unaudited.

3


Table of Contents

RUBIO’S RESTAURANTS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS — UNAUDITED
(In thousands, except per share data)
                                     
        13 Weeks Ended   26 Weeks Ended
       
 
        June 30,   July 1,   June 30,   July 1,
        2002   2001   2002   2001
       
 
 
 
REVENUE:
                               
 
Restaurant sales
  $ 30,607     $ 28,849     $ 60,450     $ 55,379  
 
Franchise and licensing revenue
    94       63       129       111  
 
   
     
     
     
 
TOTAL REVENUE
    30,701       28,912       60,579       55,490  
 
   
     
     
     
 
COSTS AND EXPENSES:
                               
 
Cost of sales
    8,248       7,878       16,579       15,356  
 
Restaurant labor, occupancy and other
    16,726       15,846       33,481       31,225  
 
General and administrative expenses
    2,481       2,502       5,189       5,219  
 
Depreciation and amortization
    1,315       1,310       2,599       2,529  
 
Pre-opening expenses
    3       93       93       234  
 
Loss on disposal/sale of property
    40       1       39       1  
 
   
     
     
     
 
TOTAL COSTS AND EXPENSES
    28,813       27,630       57,980       54,564  
 
   
     
     
     
 
OPERATING INCOME
    1,888       1,282       2,599       926  
 
   
     
     
     
 
OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME:
                               
 
Interest and investment income
    24       70       56       188  
 
Interest expense
    (32 )     (22 )     (64 )     (41 )
 
   
     
     
     
 
   
OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME — NET
    (8 )     48       (8 )     147  
 
   
     
     
     
 
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
    1,880       1,330       2,591       1,073  
INCOME TAX EXPENSE
    752       532       1,036       429  
 
   
     
     
     
 
NET INCOME
  $ 1,128     $ 798     $ 1,555     $ 644  
 
   
     
     
     
 
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS:
                               
 
Basic
  $ 1,128     $ 798     $ 1,555     $ 644  
 
   
     
     
     
 
 
Diluted
  $ 1,128     $ 798     $ 1,555     $ 644  
 
   
     
     
     
 
NET INCOME PER SHARE:
                               
 
Basic
  $ 0.13     $ 0.09     $ 0.17     $ 0.07  
 
   
     
     
     
 
 
Diluted
  $ 0.12     $ 0.09     $ 0.17     $ 0.07  
 
   
     
     
     
 
SHARES USED IN CALCULATING NET INCOME PER SHARE:
                               
 
Basic
    8,998       8,922       8,982       8,917  
 
   
     
     
     
 
 
Diluted
    9,185       9,002       9,126       8,998  
 
   
     
     
     
 

See notes to consolidated financial statements-unaudited.

4


Table of Contents

RUBIO’S RESTAURANTS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS — UNAUDITED
(In thousands)
                         
            26 Weeks Ended
           
            June 30,   July 1,
            2002   2001
           
 
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
               
 
Net income
  $ 1,555     $ 644  
 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
   
Depreciation and amortization
    2,599       2,529  
   
Deferred compensation
    190       25  
   
Loss on disposal/sale of property
    39       1  
   
Changes in assets and liabilities:
               
     
Income taxes receivable/payable
    1,065       428  
     
Other receivables
    158       64  
     
Inventory
    394       453  
     
Prepaid expenses
    (1,227 )     (265 )
     
Other assets
    52       26  
     
Deferred income taxes
    896       4  
     
Accounts payable
    (1,315 )     (1,196 )
     
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
    581       158  
     
Store closure reserve
    (821 )      
     
Deferred rent
    173       145  
     
Deferred franchise revenue
    (28 )     (34 )
 
   
     
 
       
Cash provided by operating activities
    4,311       2,982  
 
   
     
 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
               
 
Purchases of property
    (1,918 )     (5,326 )
 
Proceeds from sales of property
    311       562  
 
Purchases of investments
    (2,100 )     (10,451 )
 
Sales and maturities of investments
    1,770       14,119  
 
   
     
 
       
Cash used in investing activities
    (1,937 )     (1,096 )
 
   
     
 
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
               
 
Proceeds from exercise of common stock options
    218       45  
 
   
     
 
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
    2,592       1,931  
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD
    4,710       1,311  
 
   
     
 
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD
  $ 7,302     $ 3,242  
 
   
     
 
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
               
 
Cash paid for interest
  $ 50     $  
 
Net income tax refund received
  $ (875 )   $  

See notes to consolidated financial statements-unaudited.

5


Table of Contents

RUBIO’S RESTAURANTS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — UNAUDITED

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

     The accompanying consolidated financial information has been prepared by Rubio’s Restaurants, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Rubio’s Restaurants of Nevada, Inc. (collectively, the “Company”) without audit, in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and therefore does not include all information and notes necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

     UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL DATA — In the opinion of management, the unaudited consolidated financial statements for the interim periods presented reflect all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring accruals, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations as of and for such periods indicated. These consolidated financial statements and related notes should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2001 included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K and the review of our more critical accounting policies identified under the caption “Critical Accounting Policies” in that report. Results for the interim periods presented in this report are not necessarily indicative of results which may be reported for any other interim period or for the entire fiscal year.

     RECLASSIFICATION — Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. Specifically, the Company has reclassified $28,000 and $46,000 of licensing revenue for the 13 and 26 weeks ended July 1, 2001, respectively, from restaurant sales to franchise and licensing revenue to conform to the presentation for the 13 and 26 weeks ended June 30, 2002, respectively.

2. ASSET IMPAIRMENT AND STORE CLOSURE EXPENSE — The Company periodically assesses its ability to recover the carrying value of its long-lived assets. If the Company concludes that the carrying value will not be recovered based on expected future cash flows, an impairment write-down is recorded to reduce the asset to its estimated fair value. Impairment is reviewed at the lowest levels for which there are identifiable cash flows that are independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets. In the Company’s circumstances, such analysis is performed on an individual restaurant basis. For assets to be held and used, the impairment charge is the difference between the carrying value and the estimated fair value of the assets. For assets to be disposed of, the impairment charge is the difference between the carrying value and the fair value less cost to sell.

     The Company makes decisions to close stores based on their cash flows and anticipated future profitability. The Company records losses associated with the closure of restaurants in the same quarter that the decision to close these restaurants is made. These store closure charges primarily represent a liability for the future lease obligations after the expected closure dates, net of estimated sublease income, if any.

6


Table of Contents

RUBIO’S RESTAURANTS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — UNAUDITED (continued)

2. ASSET IMPAIRMENT AND STORE CLOSURE EXPENSE (continued)

     Asset impairment and store closure expenses are estimates that the Company has recorded based on reasonable assumptions related to these restaurant locations at a point in time. The conditions regarding these locations may change in the future and could be materially affected by factors such as the Company’s ability to maintain or improve sales levels, the Company’s ability to secure subleases, the Company’s success at negotiating early termination agreements with lessors, the general health of the economy and resultant demand for commercial property. Amounts recorded may not be sufficient and adjustments may be necessary.

     During the second half of fiscal year 2001, the Company recorded a $6.6 million charge related to the impairment of a select number of under-performing restaurants. Additionally, the Company recorded a $4.8 million charge related to store closures, consisting primarily of future lease obligations on these closed stores (net of estimated sublease income, if any), severance and other related charges, when management committed to its store closure plan during the fourth quarter of 2001. Total charges recorded in fiscal year 2001 related to impairment and store closures were $11.4 million.

     The changes in the store closure reserve during the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2002 were as follows (in thousands):

                           
      Reserve           Reserve
      Balance at           Balance at
      December 30,           June 30,
      2001   Net Usage   2002
     
 
 
Reserve for stores closed in 2001
  $ 2,800     $ (606 )   $ 2,194  
Reserve for stores to be closed
    1,150       (4 )     1,146  
Severance and other costs
    527       (211 )     316  
 
   
     
     
 
 
Total store closure reserve
    4,477     $ (821 )     3,656  
 
           
         
 
Less: current portion
    (1,496 )             (1,280 )
 
   
             
 
 
Non-current
  $ 2,981             $ 2,376  
 
   
             
 

     In addition, the Company has decided to pursue a franchising effort on 13 selected Company-owned locations in certain regions. On April 15, 2002, the Company completed the sale of four of its Company-owned stores in the Las Vegas, Nevada market to a franchisee. There was no gain or loss on the sale of the stores as they had been written down to their estimated fair value less costs to sell as part of the 2001 fiscal year impairment write-down. Although the leases for those locations were assigned as part of the franchise arrangements, the Company remains contingently liable under those leases. The Company is also actively marketing its stores in Salt Lake City, Utah, Denver, Colorado and Tucson, Arizona for sale to qualified franchisees. During the 26 weeks ending June 30, 2002, there have been no significant changes to the estimates used to determine the reserve balances.

7


Table of Contents

RUBIO’S RESTAURANTS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — UNAUDITED (continued)

3. BALANCE SHEET DETAILS as of June 30, 2002 and December 30, 2001, respectively (in thousands):

                   
      2002   2001
     
 
OTHER RECEIVABLES:
               
 
Tenant improvement receivables
  $ 175     $ 274  
 
Other
    340       399  
 
   
     
 
Total
  $ 515     $ 673  
 
   
     
 
INVESTMENTS:
               
 
Corporate bonds
  $ 1,623     $ 505  
 
Municipal bonds
    371       173  
 
Tax-free municipals
          900  
 
Mortgage and asset-backed securities
          91  
 
   
     
 
 
    1,994       1,669  
 
Less: current portion
    (1,994 )     (1,302 )
 
   
     
 
Non-current
  $     $ 367  
 
   
     
 
PROPERTY — at cost:
               
 
Building and leasehold improvements
  $ 27,769     $ 26,643  
 
Equipment and furniture
    24,422       23,586  
 
Construction in process and related costs
    190       885  
 
   
     
 
 
    52,381       51,114  
 
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization
    (17,501 )     (15,203 )
 
   
     
 
Total
  $ 34,880     $ 35,911  
 
   
     
 
ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER LIABILITIES:
               
 
Compensation
  $ 1,383     $ 1,178  
 
Sales taxes
    720       807  
 
Vacation pay
    547       585  
 
Workers compensation
    506       293  
 
Other
    1,059       771  
 
   
     
 
Total
  $ 4,215     $ 3,634  
 
   
     
 

8


Table of Contents

RUBIO’S RESTAURANTS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — UNAUDITED (continued)

4. CREDIT FACILITIES

     REVOLVING LINE OF CREDIT — As of June 30, 2002 and December 30, 2001, the Company had available $10.4 million of a $12 million revolving line of credit with a maturity date of July 2004. The credit line bears interest based on certain leverage ratios and ranges from the lower of a bank reference rate plus 1% – 2%, or an adjusted London Interbank Offered Rate plus 2.5% – 3.5% per annum (4.38% as of June 30, 2002). The Company pays a commitment fee on the unused portion of the line of credit. As of June 30, 2002 and December 30, 2001, the Company had borrowings of $1.0 million on the line of credit and $0.6 million assigned to a standby letter of credit, related to the Company’s workers compensation insurance policy, that matures in October 2002.

     The credit facility contains various covenants including a minimum EBITDA, fixed charge coverage ratio, minimum interest coverage ratio, and maximum total leverage ratio, and places restrictions on fixed asset purchases. The revolving line of credit restricts the payment of cash dividends and other stock redemptions or repurchases. The Company’s assets collateralize borrowings under the revolving line of credit.

5. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

     LITIGATION — On June 28, 2001, a class action complaint was filed against the Company in Orange County, California Superior Court by a former employee, who worked in the position of general manager. A second similar class action complaint was filed in Orange County, California Superior Court on December 21, 2001, on behalf of another former employee who worked in the positions of general manager and assistant manager. The Company classifies both positions as exempt. The former employees each purport to represent a class of former and current employees who are allegedly similarly situated. These cases currently involve the issue of whether employees and former employees in the general and assistant manager positions who worked in the California restaurants during specified time periods were misclassified as exempt and deprived of overtime pay. In addition to unpaid overtime, these cases seek to recover waiting time penalties, interest, attorneys’ fees, and other types of relief on behalf of the current and former employees that these former employees purport to represent.

     The Company believes these cases are without merit and intends to vigorously defend against the related claims. These cases are in the early stages of discovery and the status of the class action certification is yet to be determined for both suits. It is probable that the latter action may either be stayed pending resolution of the previously described action or consolidated into the former action. The Company is presently unable to predict the probable outcome of these matters and the amounts of damages at issue are also unknown at this time.

     The Company is unaware of any other litigation that could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or business.

9


Table of Contents

RUBIO’S RESTAURANTS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — UNAUDITED (continued)

6. EARNINGS PER SHARE

     A reconciliation of basic and diluted earnings per share in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 128, “Earnings Per Share,” is as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
                                       
          13 Weeks Ended   26 Weeks Ended
         
 
          June 30,   July 1,   June 30,   July 1,
          2002   2001   2002   2001
         
 
 
 
Numerator
                               
 
Basic:
                               
   
Net income attributable to common stockholders
  $ 1,128     $ 798     $ 1,555     $ 644  
 
   
     
     
     
 
 
Diluted:
                               
   
Net income attributable to common stockholders
  $ 1,128     $ 798     $ 1,555     $ 644  
 
   
     
     
     
 
Denominator
                               
 
Basic:
                               
   
Weighted average common shares outstanding
    8,998       8,922       8,982       8,917  
 
Diluted:
                               
   
Effect of dilutive securities:
                               
     
Common stock options
    187       80       144       81  
 
   
     
     
     
 
     
Total weighted average common and potential common shares outstanding
    9,185       9,002       9,126       8,998  
 
   
     
     
     
 
Earnings per share:
                               
 
Basic
  $ 0.13     $ 0.09     $ 0.17     $ 0.07  
 
   
     
     
     
 
 
Diluted
  $ 0.12     $ 0.09     $ 0.17     $ 0.07  
 
   
     
     
     
 

10


Table of Contents

Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

     This quarterly report on Form 10-Q may contain predictions, projections, estimates and other forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including without limitation, those discussed below under “Risk Factors.” While this outlook represents our current judgment on the future direction of the business, such risks and uncertainties could cause actual results to differ materially from any future performance suggested below. We undertake no obligation to release publicly the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances arising after the date of this quarterly report. The cautionary statements made in this discussion and analysis should be read as applying to all related forward-looking statements wherever they appear in this 10-Q.

OVERVIEW

     We opened our first restaurant under the name “Rubio’s, Home of the Fish Taco” in 1983. We position our restaurants in the high-quality, quick-service Mexican food segment of the restaurant industry. Our business strategy is to become the leading brand in this industry segment nationwide.

     Rubio’s Restaurants, Inc. was incorporated in California in 1985 and reincorporated in Delaware in 1997. In May 1999, we completed our initial public offering. In late 2000 and early 2001, we started a franchise program by entering into agreements with two franchisee groups. These two agreements represent commitments to open 14 units, of which three units were open as of August 1, 2002. On April 15, 2002, we completed the sale of four company-owned stores in the Las Vegas, Nevada market to a new franchisee. We opened five stores during the first quarter of 2002. We also closed one underperforming store in Arizona on February 8, 2002. We plan to close one other location in Southern California by the end of fiscal 2002. Our current expansion plan calls for us to open approximately nine company-owned restaurants and our franchisees to open one restaurant in fiscal year 2002. We also decided to actively pursue several franchise groups in an effort to sell the remaining company-owned locations in Colorado and Utah. We will continue to focus our efforts on building our presence in our core markets in California and Arizona.

     As a result of our expansion, period-to-period comparisons of our financial results may not be meaningful. When a new unit opens, it will typically incur higher than normal levels of food and labor costs until new personnel gain experience. Hourly labor schedules are gradually adjusted downward during the first three months of a restaurant opening, in order to reach operating efficiencies similar to those at established units. In calculating our comparable restaurant base, we introduce a restaurant into our comparable restaurant base once it has been in operation for 15 calendar months.

     Revenues represent gross restaurant sales, less coupons and other discounts, and franchise and licensing revenue. Cost of sales is composed of food, beverage, and paper supply expense. Components of restaurant labor, occupancy and other expenses include direct hourly and management wages, bonuses, fringe benefit costs, rent and other occupancy costs, advertising and promotion, operating supplies, utilities, maintenance and repairs, and other operating expenses.

General and administrative expenses include all corporate and administrative functions that support existing operations and provide infrastructure to facilitate our future growth. Components of this category include management, supervisory and staff salaries and employee benefits, travel, information systems, training, corporate rent, professional and consulting fees and franchise expense.

11


Table of Contents

     Pre-opening expenses, which are expensed as incurred, consist of the costs of hiring and training the initial workforce, travel, the cost of food used in training, the cost of the initial stocking of operating supplies and other direct costs related to opening a new restaurant.

     On June 14, 2002, we entered into a one-year consulting agreement with Jack Goodall, a non-employee member of our Board of Directors. Under the consulting agreement, Mr. Goodall advises and consults with our President and Chief Executive Officer on various issues including marketing review, real estate review and other strategic corporate initiatives as identified by our Board of Directors. In consideration for his services and in lieu of cash compensation, Mr. Goodall received a non-statutory stock option to purchase an aggregate of 50,000 registered shares of our common stock pursuant to our 1999 Stock Incentive Plan. The option is fully vested and immediately exercisable and expires on June 14, 2004. The Board of Directors, with Mr. Goodall recusing himself, approved the consulting agreement and the option.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

     The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make assumptions and estimates that can have a material impact on a company’s financial condition and results. Critical accounting policies are those that are most important to the portrayal of a company’s financial condition and results, and that require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgements, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. A summary of our critical accounting policies is set forth in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2001 under the caption “Critical Accounting Policies.”

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

     All comparisons under this heading between 2002 and 2001 refer to the 13-week period ended June 30, 2002 and the 13-week period ended July 1, 2001, respectively, unless otherwise indicated.

     Our operating results, expressed as a percentage of revenue, were as follows:

12


Table of Contents

                   
      13 Weeks Ended
     
      June 30,   July 1,
      2002   2001
     
 
Revenue (1)
    100.0 %     100.0 %
Costs and expenses:
               
 
Cost of sales
    27.0       27.3  
 
Restaurant labor, occupancy and other
    54.5       54.9  
 
General and administrative expenses (2)
    8.1       8.7  
 
Depreciation and amortization
    4.3       4.5  
 
Pre-opening expenses
          0.3  
 
Loss on disposal/sale of property
           
 
   
     
 
Operating income
    6.1       4.3  
Other (expense) income:
               
 
Interest income, net
          0.2  
 
   
     
 
Income before income taxes
    6.1       4.5  
Income tax expense
    2.4       1.8  
 
   
     
 
Net income
    3.7 %     2.7 %
 
   
     
 


(1)   Includes $94,000 and $63,000 in franchise and licensing revenue for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2002 and July 1, 2001, respectively.
(2)   Includes $129,000 and $130,000 in franchise expense for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2002 and July 1, 2001, respectively.

13 WEEKS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002 COMPARED TO THE 13 WEEKS ENDED JULY 1, 2001

     Results of operations reflect 13 weeks of operations for 134 restaurants and a partial period of operations for four restaurants for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2002. Results of operations also reflect 13 weeks of operations for 130 restaurants and a partial period of operations for five restaurants for the 13 weeks ended July 1, 2001.

     REVENUE. Revenue increased $1.8 million or 6.2%, to $30.7 million for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2002 from $28.9 million for the 13 weeks ended July 1, 2001. The increase in 2002 was primarily due to sales of $1.4 million from our five 2002 store openings, a $2.1 million increase in sales generated by a full quarter of operations from units opened in 2001 that were not yet in our comparable unit base, an increase in comparable store sales of $0.2 million or 0.9%, a $0.1 million increase in franchising and licensing revenue, offset by a decrease of $1.4 million in sales at the 12 stores that have been closed and $0.6 million for the four stores sold to a franchisee. Units enter the comparable store base after 15 full months of operation. The increase in comparable store sales was primarily due to a 2.2% increase in average check, offset by a 1.3% decrease in transactions. The increase in comparable store sales is due primarily to the success of the company-wide fajita promotion, followed by the crispy shrimp taco promotion in San Diego, Los Angeles and Orange Counties in California.

     COST OF SALES. Cost of sales as a percentage of revenue decreased to 27.0% in the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2002 from 27.3% in the 13 weeks ended July 1, 2001. The decrease was primarily due to the elimination of certain discounts, (0.3%), and enhanced operational controls, (0.6%), partially offset by an increase in produce prices, (0.6%).

     RESTAURANT LABOR, OCCUPANCY AND OTHER. Restaurant labor, occupancy, and other decreased as a percentage of revenue to 54.5% for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2002 from 54.9% in the 13 weeks ended July 1, 2001. The decrease as a percentage of revenue is due in part to a decrease in total direct and related labor costs of approximately 1.4%. These labor decreases were primarily due to the closure of

13


Table of Contents

under-performing stores, (0.9%), combined with improved operational efficiencies, (0.5%). The 1.4% labor cost decrease was offset by 0.7% increase in advertising and a 0.3% increase in menu upgrade and concept repositioning costs.

     GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. General and administrative expenses of $2.5 million for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2002 were consistent with the 13 weeks ended July 1, 2001. As a percentage of revenue, general and administrative expenses decreased to 8.1% for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2002 from 8.7% for the 13 weeks ended July 1, 2001. The decrease as a percentage of sales was primarily due to the leveraging of our expanding revenue base.

     DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION. Depreciation and amortization expenses of $1.3 million in the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2002 were essentially flat to $1.3 million in the 13 weeks ended July 1, 2001. As a percentage of restaurant sales, depreciation and amortization decreased to 4.3% for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2002 from 4.5% for the 13 weeks ended July 1, 2001.

     PRE-OPENING EXPENSES. Pre-opening expenses decreased to $3,000 for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2002 from $93,000 for the 13 weeks ended July 1, 2001. The decrease was due to no new stores opening during the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2002.

     INTEREST INCOME, NET. Net interest income (expense) fluctuated to $(8,000) for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2002 from $48,000 in net interest income for the 13 weeks ended July 1, 2001, primarily due to interest expense incurred by our borrowing on the credit line in July 2001 and the reduction in interest rates paid on our investments. Interest income decreased to $24,000 for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2002 from $70,000 for the 13 weeks ended June 1, 2001 primarily due to lower interest rates paid on our investments.

     INCOME TAXES. The provision for income taxes for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2002 and 13 weeks ended July 1, 2001 is based on the approximate annual effective tax rate of 40% applied to the respective period’s pretax book income. The 40% tax rate applied to the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2002 comprises the federal and state statutory rates based on the estimated annual effective rate on pre-tax income of $1,880,000. The 40% tax rate applied to the 13 weeks ended July 1, 2001 comprises the federal and state statutory rates based on the estimated annual effective rate on pre-tax income of $1,330,000.

     All comparisons in the following section refer to the 26-week period ended June 30, 2002 and the 26-week period ended July 1, 2001, respectively, unless otherwise indicated.

     Our operating results, expressed as a percentage of revenue, were as follows:

14


Table of Contents

                   
      26 Weeks Ended
     
      June 30,   July 1,
      2002   2001
     
 
Revenue (1)
    100.0 %     100.0 %
Costs and expenses:
               
 
Cost of sales
    27.4       27.7  
 
Restaurant labor, occupancy and other
    55.3       56.3  
 
General and administrative expenses (2)
    8.6       9.4  
 
Depreciation and amortization
    4.3       4.6  
 
Pre-opening expenses
    0.1       0.4  
 
Loss on disposal/sale of property
           
 
   
     
 
Operating income
    4.3       1.6  
Other income (expense):
               
 
Interest income, net
          0.2  
 
   
     
 
Income before income taxes
    4.3       1.8  
Income tax expense
    1.7       0.7  
 
   
     
 
Net income
    2.6 %     1.1 %
 
   
     
 


(1)   Includes $129,000 and $111,000 in franchise and licensing revenue for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2002 and July 1, 2001, respectively.
(2)   Includes $213,000 and $218,000 in franchise expense for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2002 and July 1, 2001, respectively.

26 WEEKS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002 COMPARED TO THE 26 WEEKS ENDED JULY 1, 2001

     Results of operations reflect 26 weeks of operations for 129 restaurants and partial period operations for ten restaurants for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2002. Results of operations also reflect 26 weeks of operations for 126 restaurants and a partial period of operations for nine restaurants for the 26 weeks ended July 1, 2001.

     REVENUE. Revenue increased $5.1 million or 9.2%, to $60.6 million for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2002 from $55.5 million for the 26 weeks ended July 1, 2001. The increase in 2002 was primarily due to sales of $2.3 million from our five 2002 store openings, $5.3 million in sales generated by a full six months of operations from units opened in 2001 and 2000 that were not yet in our comparable unit base, an increase in comparable store sales of $0.7 million or 1.4%, offset by a decrease of $2.6 million in sales from the 12 stores that have been closed and $0.6 million for the four stores sold to a franchisee. Units enter the comparable store base after 15 full months of operation. The increase in comparable store sales was primarily due to a 1.0% increase in the average check amount and a 0.3% increase in transactions.

     COST OF SALES. Cost of sales as a percentage of revenue decreased to 27.4% in the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2002 from 27.7% in the 26 weeks ended July 1, 2001. The decrease was primarily due to the elimination of certain discounts, (0.4%), and enhanced operational controls, (0.3%), partially offset by an increase in produce prices, (0.4%).

     RESTAURANT LABOR, OCCUPANCY AND OTHER. Restaurant labor, occupancy, and other decreased as a percentage of revenue to 55.3% for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2002 from 56.3% in the 26 weeks ended July 1, 2001. The decrease as a percentage of sales is due in part to a decrease in total direct and related labor costs of approximately 1.5%. These labor decreases were primarily due to the closure of under-performing stores combined with improved operational efficiencies. In addition, unit operating expenses were 0.3% lower than last year primarily due to lower utility costs. Partially offsetting the decreases in labor and unit operating expenses was a 0.4% increase in advertising costs and 0.3% in costs related to our concept repositioning project.

15


Table of Contents

     GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. General and administrative expenses of $5.2 million for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2002 were essentially flat to $5.2 million for the 26 weeks ended July 1, 2001. As a percentage of restaurant sales, general and administrative expenses decreased to 8.6% for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2002 from 9.4% for the 26 weeks ended July 1, 2001. The decrease as a percentage of sales was primarily due to the leveraging of our expanding revenue base.

     DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION. Depreciation and amortization expenses increased to $2.6 million in the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2002 from $2.5 million in the 26 weeks ended July 1, 2001. The net $0.1 million increase was primarily due to the additional depreciation on the 9 new units opened during the last six months of 2001 and the 5 new units opened during 2002, offset by the reduction in depreciation from the stores closed or impaired in 2001. As a percentage of revenue, depreciation and amortization decreased to 4.3% for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2002 from 4.6% for the 26 weeks ended July 1, 2001.

     PRE-OPENING EXPENSES. Pre-opening expenses decreased to $93,000 for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2002 from $234,000 for the 26 weeks ended July 1, 2001. The decrease was due in part to opening four less units in the first six months of 2002 versus 2001. The average pre-opening cost per new unit opening decreased from approximately $26,000 per new unit in the prior year to approximately $19,000 per new unit in the current year due to opening more locations in mature markets in 2002 than in 2001. New markets traditionally require higher pre-opening costs than mature markets due to the lack of leveraging an existing region’s resources.

     INTEREST INCOME, NET. Net interest income (expense) decreased to $(8,000) for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2002 from $147,000 in net interest income for the 26 weeks ended July 1, 2001. Interest income decreased to $56,000 for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2002 from $188,000 for the 26 weeks ended July 1, 2001. The decrease is primarily due to reduced interest rates paid on investments. Interest expense increased to $64,000 in the current year from $41,000 in the same prior year period due to interest expense incurred by our borrowing on the credit line in July 2001.

     INCOME TAXES. The provision for income taxes for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2002 and 26 weeks ended July 1, 2001 is based on the approximate annual effective tax rate of 40% applied to the respective period’s pretax book income. The 40% tax rate applied to the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2002 comprises the federal and state statutory rates based on the estimated annual effective rate on pre-tax income of $2,591,000. The 40% tax rate applied to the 26 weeks ended July 1, 2001 comprises the federal and state statutory rates based on the estimated annual effective rate on pre-tax income of $1,073,000.

     SEASONALITY

     Historically, we have experienced seasonal variability in our quarterly operating results with higher sales per restaurant in the second and third quarters than in the first and fourth quarters. The higher sales in the second and third quarters improve profitability by reducing the impact of our restaurants’ fixed and semi-fixed costs, as well as through increased revenues. This seasonal impact on our operating results is expected to continue.

     INFLATION

     Components of our operations subject to inflation include labor, food, beverage, and lease costs. Our leases require us to pay taxes, maintenance, repairs, insurance and utilities, all of which are subject to inflationary increases. We believe that current adverse conditions in the insurance, utility

16


Table of Contents

and labor areas specifically, could have an impact on our results of operations during the upcoming year.

     DEFERRED TAX ASSETS

     The Company utilizes Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, which requires the recognition of deferred income tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements and income tax returns. Under this method, deferred income taxes are recorded based on current income tax rates applied to differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities, as well as the effects of operating loss carryforwards and income tax credits. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred income tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. Management must make estimates and judgments on future taxable income, considering feasible tax planning strategies and taking into account existing facts and circumstances, to determine the proper valuation allowance. The Company does not believe a valuation allowance is necessary at June 30, 2002. The provision for income taxes represents the income tax payable for the period and the change during the period in deferred income tax assets and liabilities. For the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2002, the Company’s income tax provision of $1,036,000 consisted of a reduction in deferred income taxes of $896,000 and an increase in income taxes payable of $140,000.

     LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

     We have funded our capital requirements in recent years through the public sale of equity securities, cash flow from operations and bank debt. We generated $4.3 million in cash flow from operating activities for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2002 and $3.0 million for the 26 weeks ended July 1, 2001.

     Net cash used by investing activities was $1.9 million for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2002 compared to net cash used by investing activities of $1.1 million for the 26 weeks ended July 1, 2001. Net cash used by investing activities for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2002 included $1.9 million in capital expenditures, where net cash used by investing activities for the 26 weeks ended July 1, 2001 consisted of $5.3 million of capital expenditures offset by a net $3.7 million provided by the sale, purchases and maturities of investments.

     Net cash provided by financing activities was $218,000 for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2002 compared to net cash provided of $45,000 for the 26 weeks ended July 1, 2001. Financing activities in both quarters consisted of proceeds from the exercise of common stock options.

     As of June 30, 2002, we had available $10.4 million of a $12.0 million revolving line of credit agreement with a financial institution that matures in July 2004. On July 25, 2001, we drew $1.0 million on the line of credit. As of June 30, 2002, our outstanding principal balance under this agreement was $1.0 million and we had $0.6 million assigned to a standby letter of credit that matures in October 2002. Interest on the revolving line of credit is calculated on the lower of either a bank reference rate plus 1% – 2%, or on an adjusted London Interbank Offered Rate plus 2.5% – 3.5% per annum.

     Our funds are principally used for the development and opening of new units. We incurred $1.9 million in capital expenditures during the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2002, of which $1.3 million was for newly opened units, $0.4 million for existing locations and $0.2 million for corporate and information technology expenditures. During the 26 weeks ended July 1, 2001, we incurred $5.3 million in capital expenditures, of which $3.6 million was for new unit openings, $0.2 million for future openings, $0.9 million for remodels and point of sale system upgrades, $0.5 million for existing locations and $0.1 million for corporate and information technology expenditures.

17


Table of Contents

     We currently expect total capital expenditures in 2002 to be approximately $6.2 million, of which approximately $3.6 million is forecasted for the opening of new restaurants, $1.5 million to implement the concept repositioning, $0.7 million for existing stores and $0.4 million for corporate, information technology and other. We currently plan to open approximately nine units in 2002 and a minimum of ten units in 2003. We currently expect that future locations will generally cost between $425,000 and $500,000 per unit, net of landlord allowances and excluding pre-opening expenses. Some units may exceed this range due to the area in which they are built and the specific requirements of the project. Pre-opening expenses are expected to average between $19,000 and $25,000 per restaurant.

     The Company is undertaking a number of projects in 2002 and carrying over into 2003 that are designed to potentially improve sales. Certain of these projects, including proposed new store design, a potential retrofit design that can be incorporated into existing restaurants, signage changes, and new menu items, bigger portions, the addition of some value priced menu items, additional salsa bar choices, and new product packaging could require a significant amount of capital. These projects may require that certain existing assets be disposed of as a result of these projects. The Company is unable to estimate the capital requirements for these projects or the potential asset disposals until certain project tests are complete and rollout schedules are determined.

     We believe that anticipated cash flow from operations combined with funds anticipated to be available from our $12.0 million credit facility and our cash and investments balance of $9.3 million as of June 30, 2002 will be sufficient to satisfy our working capital and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next 12 months. Changes in our operating plans, changes in our expansion plans, lower than anticipated sales, our ability to meet the financial covenants of our credit facility, increased expenses, potential acquisitions or other events may cause us to seek additional financing sooner than anticipated. Additional financing may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all. Failure to obtain additional financing as needed could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

     RELATED PARTY TRANSACTION

     On June 14, 2002, we entered into a one-year consulting agreement with Jack Goodall, a non-employee member of our Board of Directors. Under the consulting agreement, Mr. Goodall advises and consults with our President and Chief Executive Officer on various issues including marketing review, real estate review and other strategic corporate initiatives as identified by our Board of Directors. In consideration for his services and in lieu of cash compensation, Mr. Goodall received a non-statutory stock option to purchase an aggregate of 50,000 registered shares of our common stock pursuant to our 1999 Stock Incentive Plan. The option is fully vested and immediately exercisable and expires on June 14, 2004. The Board of Directors, with Mr. Goodall recusing himself, approved the consulting agreement and the option.

     RISK FACTORS

     Any investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should consider carefully the following information about these risks, together with the other information contained in this quarterly report, before you decide to buy our common stock. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business would likely suffer. In such case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of the money you paid to buy our common stock.

18


Table of Contents

OUR EXPECTED REVENUES, COMPARABLE STORE SALES AND OVERALL EARNINGS PER SHARE MAY NOT BE ATTAINED DUE TO FACTORS REGARDING OUR BRAND AWARENESS, MARKETING STRATEGY AND OUR ABILITY TO MANAGE ONGOING AND UNANTICIPATED COSTS.

     Our expected sales levels and earnings rely heavily on the acceptability and quality of the products we serve. If any variances are experienced with respect to the recognition of our brand, the acceptableness of our promotions, or the ability to manage our ongoing operations as well as the ability to absorb unexpected costs, we could fall short of our revenue and earnings expectations. Factors that could have a significant impact on earnings include:

          labor costs for our hourly and management personnel, including increases in federal or state minimum wage requirements;
 
          fluctuations in food and beverage costs, particularly the cost of chicken, beef, fish, cheese and produce;
 
          costs related to our leases;
 
          timing of new restaurant openings and related expenses;
 
          the amount of sales contributed by new and existing restaurants;
 
          our ability to achieve and sustain profitability on a quarterly or annual basis;
 
          the ability for our marketing initiatives and earnings improvement projects to increase sales;
 
          consumer confidence;
 
          changes in consumer preferences;
 
          the level of competition from existing or new competitors in the quick-service restaurant industry;
 
          impact of weather on revenues and costs of food;
 
          insurance and utility costs; and
 
          general economic conditions.

WE HAVE RECENTLY CREATED RESERVES RELATED TO THE CLOSURE OF SOME SELECTED STORES. IF THE AMOUNTS OF THESE RESERVES ARE INADEQUATE, WE COULD EXPERIENCE AN ADVERSE EFFECT TO OUR EARNINGS EXPECTATIONS IN THE FUTURE.

     Our reserves for expenses related to closed stores are estimates. The amounts we have recorded are our reasonable assumptions based on the condition of these locations at this point in time. The conditions regarding these locations may adversely change in the future and materially affect our future earnings. We will review these reserves on a quarterly basis and will likely have adjustments that may materially have a positive or negative impact to our future earnings.

OUR CURRENT PROJECTS TO IMPROVE OUR BRAND COULD HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE COMPANY.

     We are working on a number of projects designed to improve the strength of our brand and increase sales. These projects include a proposed new store design, a potential store remodel for existing restaurants, signage changes and new menu items, bigger portions, the addition of some value priced menu items, additional salsa bar choices and new product packaging.

     The testing and implementation of these projects will have capital costs and expenses associated with them. The packaging and salsa bar changes will increase the food and paper cost of our restaurants. There is a risk that if these changes do not result in increased sales, either through increased transactions or higher average check, there could be a material adverse impact on the company’s earnings. Also, the capital requirements of these projects could have an adverse material impact on our cash balances and liquidity.

19


Table of Contents

WE MAY NOT PREVAIL IN OUR DEFENSE OF THE CLASS ACTION CLAIMS RELATED TO CALIFORNIA EXEMPT EMPLOYEE LAWS.

     During 2001, two similar class action claims were filed against us that currently involve the issue of whether employees and former employees in the general manager and assistant manager positions who worked in our California restaurants during specified time periods were misclassified as exempt and deprived of overtime pay. Although we believe these cases are without merit and intend to vigorously defend the claims related to these matters, we are unable at present to predict the probable outcome of these matters or the amount of damages that may occur if we do not prevail. An unfavorable outcome in these matters may have a material adverse impact on our earnings.

OUR OPERATING RESULTS MAY FLUCTUATE SIGNIFICANTLY DUE TO SEASONALITY AND OTHER FACTORS, WHICH COULD HAVE A NEGATIVE EFFECT ON THE PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK.

     Our business is subject to seasonal fluctuations. Historically, sales in most of our restaurants have been higher during the second and third quarters of each fiscal year. As a result, we expect our highest earnings to occur in the second and third quarters of each fiscal year.

     Accordingly, results for any one quarter or for any year are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any other quarter or for any year. Comparable unit sales for any particular future period may decrease.

WE CONTINUE TO PURSUE A FRANCHISE STRATEGY. WE MAY BE UNSUCCESSFUL IN FULLY EXECUTING THIS PROGRAM.

     We started a franchise program by entering into agreements with two franchisee groups in late 2000 and early 2001. These two agreements represent commitments to open 14 units. As of August 1, 2002, three franchisee restaurants are open under these two agreements. In addition, on April 15, 2002, we completed the sale of four company-owned stores in the Las Vegas, Nevada market to a new franchisee. Restaurant companies typically rely on franchise revenues as a significant source of revenues and potential for growth. Our inability to successfully execute our franchising program could adversely affect our business and results of operations. The opening and success of franchised restaurants is dependent on a number of factors, including availability of suitable sites, negotiations of acceptable lease or purchase terms for new locations, permitting and government regulatory compliance and the ability to meet construction schedules. The franchisees may not have all of the business abilities or access to financial resources necessary to open our restaurants or to successfully develop or operate our restaurants in their franchise areas in a manner consistent with our standards.

WE MAY BE UNABLE TO FUND OUR SUBSTANTIAL WORKING CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS AND MAY NEED ADDITIONAL FUNDING SOONER THAN WE ANTICIPATE.

     We believe that the proceeds from the initial public offering completed in May 1999, together with anticipated cash flow from operations and funds anticipated to be available from a credit facility will be sufficient to satisfy our working capital requirements for at least the next 12 months. We may need to seek additional financing sooner than we anticipate as a result of the following factors:

          capital needs associated with the potential upgrade and remodel of our restaurants, signage changes, menu related changes and other projects;
 
          changes in our operating plans;
 
          changes in our expansion plans;

20


Table of Contents

          lower than anticipated sales of our menu offerings;
 
          our ability to meet the financial covenants of our credit facility;
 
          increased food, labor costs or other expenses; and
 
          potential acquisitions or other events.

     Additional financing may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all. If we fail to get additional financing as needed, our business and results of operations would likely suffer.

FUTURE EXPANSION INTO NEW GEOGRAPHIC AREAS INVOLVES A NUMBER OF RISKS THAT COULD DELAY OR PREVENT THE OPENING OF NEW RESTAURANTS OR REQUIRE US TO ADJUST OUR EXPANSION STRATEGY.

     Almost all of our current restaurants are located in the southwest region of the United States. Our expansion into geographic areas outside the Southwest involves a number of risks, including:

          lack of market awareness or acceptance of our restaurant concept in new geographic areas;
 
          uncertainties related to local demographics, tastes and preferences;
 
          local custom, wages, costs and other legal and economic conditions particular to new regions;
 
          the need to develop relationships with local distributors and suppliers for fresh produce, fresh tortillas and other ingredients; and
 
          potential difficulties related to management of operations located in a number of broadly dispersed locations.

     We may not be successful in addressing these risks. Although we do not have current plans to expand substantially into new markets outside our core markets, if and when we do, we may not be able to open planned new operations on a timely basis, or at all in these new areas. Also, new restaurants typically will take several months to reach planned operating levels due to inefficiencies typically associated with expanding into new regions, such as lack of market awareness, acceptance of our restaurant concept and inability to hire sufficient staff.

IF WE ARE NOT ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY PURSUE OUR EXPANSION STRATEGY, OUR BUSINESS AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS MAY BE ADVERSELY IMPACTED.

     We currently plan to open approximately nine company-owned restaurants in 2002, five of which have been opened as of August 1, 2002. Three of the nine planned 2002 openings are outside Southern California. Our ability to successfully achieve our expansion strategy will depend on a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control.

     These factors include:

          our ability to operate our restaurants profitably;
 
          our ability to respond effectively to the intense competition in the quick-service restaurant industry;
 
          our ability to locate suitable restaurant sites or negotiate acceptable lease terms;
 
          our ability to obtain required local, state and federal governmental approvals and permits related to construction of the sites, food and alcoholic beverages;
 
          our dependence on contractors to construct new restaurants in a timely manner;
 
          our ability to attract, train and retain qualified and experienced restaurant personnel and management;

21


Table of Contents

          our need for additional capital and our ability to obtain such capital on favorable terms or at all; and
 
          general economic conditions.

     If we are not able to successfully address these factors, we may not be able to expand at the rate contemplated and may have to adjust our expansion strategy, and our business and results of operations may be adversely impacted.

THE ABILITY TO ATTRACT AND RETAIN HIGHLY QUALIFIED PERSONNEL TO OPERATE AND MANAGE OUR RESTAURANTS IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT AND OUR FAILURE TO DO SO COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT US.

     Our success and the success of our individual restaurants depend upon our ability to attract and retain highly motivated, well-qualified restaurant operators and management personnel, as well as a sufficient number of qualified employees, including guest service and kitchen staff, to keep pace with our expansion schedule. Qualified individuals needed to fill these positions are in short supply in some geographic areas. Our ability to recruit and retain such individuals may delay the planned openings of new restaurants or result in higher employee turnover in existing restaurants, which could have a material adverse effect on our business or results of operations. We also face significant competition in the recruitment of qualified employees. In addition, we are heavily dependent upon the services of our officers and key management involved in restaurant operations, marketing, finance, purchasing, expansion, human resources and administration. The loss of any of these individuals could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. We currently do not have employment agreements with any of our employees.

GOVERNMENT REGULATION CHANGES MAY IMPACT OUR BUSINESS

     Our restaurants are subject to licensing and regulation by state and local health, sanitation, safety, fire and other authorities, including licensing and regulation requirements for the sale of alcoholic beverages and food. A substantial number of our employees are subject to various minimum wage requirements. Many of our employees work in restaurants located in California and receive salaries equal to or slightly greater than the California minimum wage. The State of California has raised the minimum wage from $5.75 to $6.75 since January 1, 2001. Additionally, the State of California has increased benefits provided to employees covered under workers compensation insurance. Over the last year, the State of California has entered into long-term energy contracts at fixed prices. Similar proposals may come before legislators or voters in other jurisdictions in which we operate or seek to operate. The effect of these and further governmental regulations and actions may have a material adverse impact on our earnings.

IF WE ARE NOT ABLE TO ANTICIPATE AND REACT TO INCREASES IN OUR FOOD COSTS, OUR PROFITABILITY COULD BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED.

     Our restaurant operating costs principally consist of food and labor costs. Our profitability is dependent on our ability to anticipate and react to changes in food and labor costs. Various factors beyond our control, including adverse weather conditions and governmental regulation, may affect our food costs. We may be unable to anticipate and react to changing food costs, whether through our purchasing practices, menu composition or menu price adjustments in the future. In the event that food price increases cause us to increase our menu prices, we face the risk that our guests will choose to patronize lower-cost restaurants. Failure to react to changing food costs or to retain guests if we are forced to raise menu prices could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

22


Table of Contents

OUR RESTAURANTS ARE CONCENTRATED IN THE SOUTHWEST REGION OF THE UNITED STATES, AND THEREFORE, OUR BUSINESS IS SUBJECT TO FLUCTUATIONS IF ADVERSE CONDITIONS OCCUR IN THAT REGION.

     As of August 1, 2002 all but six of our existing restaurants are located in the southwest region of the United States. Accordingly, we are susceptible to fluctuations in our business caused by adverse economic or other conditions in this region, including natural or other disasters. Our significant investment in, and long-term commitment to, each of our units limits our ability to respond quickly or effectively to changes in local competitive conditions or other changes that could affect our operations. In addition, some of our competitors have many more units than we do. Consequently, adverse economic or other conditions in a region, a decline in the profitability of several existing units or the introduction of several unsuccessful new units in a geographic area could have a more significant effect on our results of operations than would be the case for a company with a larger number of restaurants or with more geographically dispersed restaurants.

AS A RESTAURANT SERVICE PROVIDER, WE COULD BE SUBJECT TO ADVERSE PUBLICITY OR CLAIMS FROM OUR GUESTS.

     We may be the subject of complaints or litigation from guests alleging food-related illness, injuries suffered on the premises or other food quality, health or operational concerns. Adverse publicity resulting from such allegations may materially affect us and our restaurants, regardless of whether such allegations are true or whether we are ultimately held liable. A lawsuit or claim could result in an adverse decision against us that could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

THE RESTAURANT INDUSTRY IS INTENSELY COMPETITIVE AND WE MAY NOT HAVE THE RESOURCES TO COMPETE ADEQUATELY.

     The restaurant industry is intensely competitive. There are many different segments within the restaurant industry that are distinguished by types of service, food types and price/value relationships. We position our restaurants in the high-quality, quick-service Mexican food segment of the industry. In this segment, our direct competitors include Baja Fresh, La Salsa and Chipotle. We also compete indirectly with full-service Mexican restaurants including Chevy’s, Chi Chi’s and El Torito, and fast food restaurants, particularly those focused on Mexican food such as Taco Bell and Del Taco. Competition in our industry segment is based primarily upon food quality, price, restaurant ambiance, service and location. Many of our direct and indirect competitors are well-established national, regional or local chains and have substantially greater financial, marketing, personnel and other resources than we do. We also compete with many other retail establishments for site locations.

OUR CURRENT INSURANCE MAY NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE LEVELS OF COVERAGE AGAINST CLAIMS OR THE AFFECTS OF ADVERSE PUBLICITY.

     There are types of losses we may incur that may be uninsurable or that we believe are not economically insurable, such as losses due to earthquakes and other natural disasters. In view of the location of many of our existing and planned units, our operations are particularly susceptible to damage and disruption caused by earthquakes. Further, we do maintain insurance coverage for employee-related litigation, however, the deductible per incident is high and we carry only limited insurance for the effects of adverse publicity. In addition, punitive damage awards are generally not covered by insurance. We may also be subject to litigation which, regardless of the outcome, could result in adverse publicity and damages. Such litigation, adverse publicity or damages could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. We do from

23


Table of Contents

time to time have employee related claims brought against us. These claims and expenses related to these claims typically have not been material to our overall financial performance. We may experience claims or be the subject of complaints or allegations from former, current or prospective employees from time to time that are material in nature and that may have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

OUR FAILURE OR INABILITY TO ENFORCE OUR CURRENT AND FUTURE TRADEMARKS AND TRADE NAMES COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR EFFORTS TO ESTABLISH BRAND EQUITY.

     Our ability to successfully expand our concept will depend on our ability to establish and maintain “brand equity” through the use of our current and future trademarks, service marks, trade dress and other proprietary intellectual property, including our name and logos. We currently hold four trademarks and have 12 service marks relating to our brand. Some or all of the rights in our intellectual property may not be enforceable, even if registered, against any prior users of similar intellectual property or our competitors who seek to utilize similar intellectual property in areas where we operate or intend to conduct operations. If we fail to enforce any of our intellectual property rights, we may be unable to capitalize on our efforts to establish brand equity. It is also possible that we will encounter claims from prior users of similar intellectual property in areas where we operate or intend to conduct operations. Claims from prior users could limit our operations and possibly cause us to incur costs through the payment of damages, licensing fees to a prior user or registrant of similar intellectual property, or attorneys’ fees or other legal costs as well.

THE LARGE NUMBER OF SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR PUBLIC SALE COULD CAUSE OUR STOCK PRICE TO DECLINE.

     The market price of our common stock could decline as a result of sales by our existing stockholders of a large number of shares of our common stock in the market or the perception that such sales could occur. These sales also might make it more difficult for us to sell equity securities in the future at a time and at a price that we deem appropriate.

OUR COMMON STOCK MAY NOT DEVELOP AN ACTIVE, LIQUID TRADING MARKET.

     We completed our initial public offering in May 1999. Prior to this offering, there was no public market for our common stock. An active trading market in and increased liquidity of our common stock may not develop.

THE MARKET PRICE OF OUR STOCK MAY BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY MARKET VOLATILITY.

     The stock market has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. The trading price of our common stock could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to a number of factors, including:

          fluctuations in our quarterly or annual results of operations;
 
          changes in published earnings estimates by analysts and whether our earnings meet or exceed such estimates;
 
          additions or departures of key personnel; and
 
          changes in overall market conditions, including the stock prices of other restaurant companies.

     In the past, companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their stock have been the object of securities class action litigation. If we were subject to securities class action litigation, it could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources.

24


Table of Contents

THE INTERESTS OF OUR CONTROLLING STOCKHOLDERS MAY CONFLICT WITH YOUR INTERESTS.

     As of August 1, 2002, the executive officers, directors and entities affiliated with them, in the aggregate, beneficially own approximately 32.2% of our outstanding common stock. These stockholders are able to exercise control over all matters requiring approval by our stockholders, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. This concentration of ownership may also have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of our company.

ANTI-TAKEOVER PROVISIONS IN OUR CHARTER DOCUMENTS AND DELAWARE LAW COULD MAKE A THIRD-PARTY ACQUISITION OF US DIFFICULT.

     The anti-takeover provisions in our certificate of incorporation, our bylaws and Delaware law could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us. As a result of these provisions, we could delay, deter or prevent a takeover attempt or third party acquisition that our stockholders consider to be in their best interest, including a takeover attempt that results in a premium over the market price for the shares held by our stockholders.

25


Table of Contents

Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

     Our market risk exposures are related to our cash, cash equivalents and investments. We invest our excess cash in highly liquid short-term investments primarily with maturities of less than one year. The portfolio consists primarily of corporate bonds and municipal bonds. As of June 30, 2002, we have no investments that have maturities in excess of one year. These investments are not held for trading or other speculative purposes. Changes in interest rates affect the investment income we earn on our investments and, therefore, impact our cash flows and results of operations. Due to the types of investment and debt instruments the Company has, a 10% change in period-end interest rates or a hypothetical 100 basis point adverse move in interest rates would not have a significant negative affect on our financial results.

     As of June 30, 2002, we had available $10.4 million of a total $12.0 million revolving line of credit with a maturity date of July 2004. As of June 30, 2002, we have $1.0 million borrowed against this facility and $0.6 million assigned to a standby letter of credit related to our workers’ compensation insurance policy that matures in October 2002. Interest on the revolving line of credit is calculated on the lower of either a bank reference rate plus 1% – 2%, or on an adjusted London Interbank Offered Rate plus 2.5% – 3.5%, per annum (4.38% as of June 30, 2002). We also pay a commitment fee on the unused portion of the line of credit. Should we make additional draws on this line in the future, changes in interest rates would affect the interest expense on these loans and, therefore, impact our cash flows and results of operations.

     Many of the food products purchased by us are affected by changes in weather, production, availability, seasonality and other factors outside our control. In an effort to control some of this risk, we have entered into some fixed price purchase commitments with terms of less than one year. In addition, we believe that almost all of our food and supplies are available from several sources, which helps to control food commodity risks.

26


Table of Contents

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Not applicable

Item 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

        (a)    Not applicable
 
        (b)    Not applicable
 
        (c)    Not applicable
 
        (d)    We currently have approximately $2.0 million remaining from our initial public offering in May 1999 as well as an additional $7.3 million of cash and cash equivalents generated from previous private placements and operating cash flows. The use of proceeds during this reporting period has conformed to our intended use outlined in our initial public offering prospectus.

Item 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

     Not applicable

Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

At the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders held on June 5, 2002, the stockholders voted on the following matters:

        (1)    Election of one director to serve for a three-year term ending upon the 2005 annual meeting of stockholders. The director was elected as follows:

             
Nominee   Votes For   Votes Withheld   Broker Non-Vote

 
 
 
Craig S. Andrews   8,524,635   18,858  

        (2)    Approval of an amendment to our 1999 Stock Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares of our common stock authorized for issuance under our 1999 plan by an additional 300,000 shares to 2,224,608.

             
Votes For   Votes Against   Votes Abstain   Broker Non-Vote

 
 
 
8,383,993   131,649   27,781  

        (3)    Ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 29, 2002.

             
Votes For   Votes Against   Votes Abstain   Broker Non-Vote

 
 
 
8,351,272   183,522   8,699  

27


Table of Contents

Item 5. OTHER INFORMATION

     Not applicable

Item 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
                              
    a)     3.1       (1)     Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (Exhibit 3.2)
          3.2       (1)     Restated Bylaws (Exhibit 3.4)
          3.3       (2)     Certificate of Amendment to Bylaws (Exhibit 3.4)
          10.1 *         Amendment dated June 21, 2002, to Agreement between us and Coca-Cola USA Fountain dated March 6, 1998.
          10.2           Consulting Agreement between us and Jack W. Goodall dated June 14, 2002
          10.3           1999 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended
          99.1           Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(1)   Incorporated by reference to the above noted exhibit to our registration statement on Form S-1 (333-75087) filed with the SEC on March 26, 1999, as amended.
(2)   Incorporated by reference to the above noted exhibit to our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on April 1, 2002.
*   Certain confidential portions of this Exhibit were omitted by means of marking such portions with an asterisk (the “Mark”). This Exhibit has been filed separately with the Secretary of the Commission without the Mark pursuant to the Company’s Application Requesting Confidential Treatment under Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

     b) Reports on Form 8-K:

          None

28


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: August 14, 2002   RUBIO’S RESTAURANTS, INC.

  /s/   IRA FILS
Ira Fils
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

29