Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003

OR

For the transition period from                                          to                                         

Commission file number 0-23656

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND VI, L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  x No  ¨

Table of Contents

FORM 10-Q

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND VI, L.P.

(A Georgia Public Limited Partnership)

INDEX

2

Table of Contents

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND VI, L.P.

(A Georgia Public Limited Partnership)

BALANCE SHEETS

See accompanying notes.

3

Table of Contents

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND VI, L.P.

(A Georgia Public Limited Partnership)

STATEMENTS OF INCOME

See accompanying notes.

4

Table of Contents

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND VI, L.P.

(A Georgia Public Limited Partnership)

STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS’ CAPITAL

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002

AND THE THREE MONTHS ENDED

MARCH 31, 2003 (UNAUDITED)

See accompanying notes.

5

Table of Contents

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND VI, L.P.

(A Georgia Public Limited Partnership)

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

See accompanying notes.

6

Table of Contents

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND VI, L.P.

(A Georgia Public Limited Partnership)

CONDENSED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2003 (UNAUDITED)

(a) Organization and Business

Wells Real Estate Fund VI, L.P. (the “Partnership”) is a Georgia public limited partnership having Leo F. Wells, III and Wells Partners, L.P. (“Wells Partners”), a Georgia non-public limited partnership, as its General Partners. The Partnership was formed on December 1, 1992, for the purpose of acquiring, developing, constructing, owning, operating, improving, leasing and otherwise managing income-producing commercial or industrial properties for investment purposes. The Partnership has two classes of limited partnership interests, Class A and Class B Units. The limited partners have the right to change their prior elections to have some or all of their units treated as Class A Units or Class B Units one time every five years and may vote to, among other things, (a) amend the partnership agreement, subject to certain limitations, (b) change the business purpose or investment objectives of the Partnership, and (c) add or remove a general partner. A majority vote on any of the above described matters will bind the Partnership without the concurrence of the general partners. Each limited partnership unit has equal voting rights regardless of class.

On April 5, 1993, the Partnership commenced a public offering of up to its limited partnership units pursuant to a Registration Statement filed on Form S-11 under the Securities Act of 1933. The Partnership terminated its offering on April 4, 1994, upon receiving and accepting gross offering proceeds of $25,000,000 representing subscriptions from a total of 1,793 Class A and Class B limited partners.

(THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)

7

Table of Contents

The Partnership owns interests in all of its real estate assets through joint ventures with other Wells Real Estate Funds. As of March 31, 2003, the Partnership owned interests in the following eight properties through the

affiliated joint ventures listed below:

Each of the aforementioned properties was acquired on an all cash basis. For further information regarding the foregoing joint ventures and properties, refer to the report filed for the Partnership on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.

8

Table of Contents

On October 1, 2001, Fund I-II-IIOW-VI-VII Associates, a joint venture among the Partnership, Wells Real Estate Fund I, Fund II and IIOW Associates, and Wells Real Estate Fund VII, L.P., sold the Cherokee Commons property to an unrelated third party. The Cherokee Commons property is a retail shopping center located in Cherokee County, Georgia.

On October 7, 2002, Fund VI-VII-VIII Associates sold an outparcel of land at Tanglewood Commons to an unrelated third-party for a gross sales price of $558,570. As a result of this sale, Fund VI-VII-VIII Associates recognized a gain of approximately $18,000, of which approximately $6,000 was allocated to the Partnership.

(b) Basis of Presentation

The financial statements of the Partnership have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X, and in accordance with such rules and regulations, do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. The quarterly statements have not been examined by independent auditors. However, in the opinion of the General Partners, the statements for the unaudited interim periods presented include all adjustments that are of a normal and recurring nature and necessary to fairly present the results for these periods. Results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of full year results. For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes included in the Partnership’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.

(c) Allocations of Net Income, Net Loss and Gain on Sale

For the purposes of determining allocations per the Partnership agreement, net income is defined generally as net income recognized by the Partnership, excluding deductions for depreciation and amortization. Net income, as defined, of the Partnership will be allocated each year in the same proportions that net cash from operations is distributed to the limited partners holding Class A units and the General Partners. To the extent the Partnership’s net income in any year exceeds net cash from operations, it will be allocated 99% to the limited partners and 1% to the General Partners.

Net loss, depreciation, and amortization deductions for each fiscal year will be allocated as follows: (a) 99% to the limited partners holding Class B units and 1% to the General Partners until their capital accounts are reduced to zero, (b) then to any Partner having a positive balance in his/her capital account in an amount not to exceed such positive balance, and (c) thereafter to the General Partners.

Gain on the sale or exchange of the Partnership’s properties will be allocated generally in the same manner that the net proceeds from such sale are distributed to Partners after the following allocations are made, if applicable: (a) allocations made pursuant to a qualified income offset provision in the partnership agreement, (b) allocations to partners having negative capital accounts until all negative capital accounts have been restored to zero, (c) allocations to Class B limited partners in amounts equal to deductions for depreciation and amortization previously allocated to them with respect to the specific partnership property sold, but not in excess of the amount of gain on sale recognized by the Partnership with respect to the sale of such property, and (d) allocations to Class A limited partners and General Partners in amounts equal to deductions for depreciation and amortization previously allocated to them with respect to the specific partnership property sold, but not in excess of the amount of gain on sale recognized by the Partnership with respect to the sale of such property.

9

Table of Contents

(d) Distribution of Net Cash From Operations

As defined by the partnership agreement, cash available for distributions is distributed quarterly on a cumulative non-compounded basis to the limited partners as follows:

No distributions will be made to the limited partners holding Class B units.

(e) Distribution of Sales Proceeds

Upon sales of properties, the net sales proceeds are distributed in the following order:

10

Table of Contents

(a) Basis of Presentation

The Partnership owned interests in eight properties as of March 31, 2003 through its ownership in the Joint Ventures. The Partnership does not have control over the operations of these joint ventures; however, it does exercise significant influence. Accordingly, the Partnership’s investments in the Joint Ventures are recorded using the equity method of accounting, whereby original investments are recorded at cost and subsequently adjusted for contributions, distributions and net income (loss) attributable to the Partnership. For further information, refer to the report filed for the Partnership on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.

(b) Summary of Operations

The following information summarizes the operations of the Joint Ventures in which the Partnership held

ownership interests for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively:

In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” which clarifies the application of Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements,” relating to consolidation of certain entities. FIN 46 will require the identification of the Partnership’s participation in variable interest entities (VIEs), which are defined as entities with a level of invested equity that is not sufficient to fund future activities to permit them to operate on a stand alone basis, or whose equity holders lack certain characteristics of a controlling financial interest. For entities identified as VIEs, FIN 46 sets forth a model to evaluate potential consolidation based on an assessment of which party to the VIE, if any, bears a majority of the exposure to its expected losses, or stands to gain from a majority of its expected returns. FIN 46 is effective for all new VIEs created or acquired after January 31, 2003. For VIEs created or acquired prior to February 1, 2003, the provisions of FIN 46 must be applied for the first interim or annual period beginning after June 15, 2003. FIN 46 also sets forth certain disclosures regarding interests in VIEs that are deemed significant, even if consolidation is not required. As the Joint Ventures do not fall under the definition of VIEs provided above, the Partnership does not believe that the adoption of FIN 46 will result in the consolidation of any previously unconsolidated entities.

11

Table of Contents

In August 2001, SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (effective beginning January 1, 2002) was issued. SFAS No. 144 addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment of long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of and supersedes SFAS No. 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of”. Among other factors, SFAS No. 144 establishes criteria beyond that previously specified in SFAS No. 121 to determine when a long-lived asset is to be considered held for sale. We believe that the adoption of SFAS No. 144 will not have a significant impact on the Partnership’s financial statements.

Management and Leasing Fees

Wells Management Company, Inc. (“Wells Management”), an affiliate of the General Partners, receives compensation for supervising the management and leasing of the Partnership’s properties owned through joint ventures equal to (a) 3% of the gross revenues for management and 3% of the gross revenues for leasing (aggregate maximum of 6%) plus a separate fee for the one-time lease-up of newly constructed properties in an amount not to exceed the fee customarily charged in arm’s-length transactions by others rendering similar services in the same geographic area for similar properties or (b) in the case of commercial properties which are leased on a long-term net basis (ten or more years), 1% of the gross revenues except for initial leasing fees equal to 3% of the gross revenues over the first five years of the lease term. For the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, the properties in which the Partnership owns interests paid management and leasing fees to Wells Management of $74,526 and $79,692, respectively.

Administration Reimbursements

Wells Capital, Inc., the general partner of Wells Partners, and its affiliates perform certain administrative services for the Partnership, such as accounting and other partnership administration, and incur the related expenses. Such expenses are allocated among the various Wells Real Estate Funds based on time spent on each fund by individual administrative personnel. For the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, the Partnership reimbursed $12,917 and $8,891, respectively, to Wells Capital, Inc. and its affiliates for these services

Conflicts of Interests

The General Partners of the Partnership are also general partners of other Wells Real Estate Funds. As such, there may exist conflicts of interest where the General Partners in their capacity as general partners of other Wells Real Estate Funds may be in competition with the Partnership in connection with property acquisitions or for tenants in similar geographic markets.

12

Table of Contents

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Partnership’s accompanying financial statements and notes thereto.

(a) Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains forward-looking statements, within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including discussion and analysis of the financial condition of the Partnership, anticipated capital expenditures required to complete certain projects, amounts of cash distributions anticipated to be distributed to limited partners in the future and certain other matters. Readers of this report should be aware that there are various factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from any forward-looking statements made in this report including lease-up risks, inability to obtain new tenants upon expiration of existing leases, and the potential need to fund tenant improvements, leasing commissions or other capital expenditures or lease-up costs out of operating cash flow.

13

Table of Contents

(b) Results of Operations

Gross Revenues

Gross revenues of the Partnership were $286,556 and $266,762 for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The 2003 increase from 2002 resulted primarily from the corresponding increase in equity in income of joint ventures further described below.

Equity In Income of Joint Ventures

Gross Revenues of Joint Ventures

Gross revenues of the joint ventures in which the Partnership holds an interest decreased in 2003, as compared to 2002, primarily due to the decrease in gross revenues from Fund II-III-VI and VII Associates due to the decline In occupancy of the Holcomb Bridge Property, which was 57% occupied as of March 31, 2003 as compared to 76% occupied as of March 31, 2002. The overall decrease is partially offset by (i) an increase in the gross revenues for Fund V-VI Associates resulting from higher rental rates recognized in connection with the Hartford lease, effective December 2002, and (ii) an increase in gross revenues for Fund VI-VII Associates resulting from adjustments to 2002 operating expense reimbursement billings to tenants of the Fazoli’s and Stockbridge Village I Expansion Buildings, which were recorded in the first quarter of 2003. Tenants are billed for operating expense reimbursements based on estimates, which are reconciled in the following calendar year based on actual costs incurred and the terms of the corresponding tenant leases.

Expenses of Joint Ventures

The expenses of the joint ventures in which the Partnership holds an interest decreased in 2003, as compared to 2002, primarily due to the following nonrecurring items: (i) recovery of doubtful accounts receivable due from tenants at the Stockbridge Village I Expansion building during the first quarter of 2003, and (ii) HVAC and Plumbing repairs expended for the BellSouth building during the first quarter of 2002. In addition, Fund I-II-IIOW-VI-VII sold the Cherokee Commons property in the fourth quarter of 2001 and, accordingly, recognized adjustments to the gain on the sale of Cherokee Commons in the first quarter of 2002 as actual information became available for the estimated operating costs and selling expenses recorded at closing, offset by an increase in accounting fees incurred in connection with changing independent auditors in 2002.

Expenses

A decrease in legal and accounting fees resulting from adjustments recorded in the first quarter of 2002 to estimated accruals for 2001 year end audit fees is largely offset by an increase in administrative salaries allocated to the Partnership in connection with evaluating various re-leasing and liquidation strategies for the Partnership’s portfolio of properties during the first quarter of 2003. As a result, expenses of the Partnership remained relatively stable at $23,952 and $24,723 for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

As a result, net income of the Partnership was $262,604 and $242,039 for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

14

Table of Contents

(c) Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flows From Operating Activities

Net cash flows from operating activities were $(38,952) and $(24,895) for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The 2003 increase in operating cash flows used from 2002 is primarily attributable to a change in the timing of payments of administrative salaries and bank fees in 2003, as compared to 2002.

Cash Flows From Investing Activities

Net cash flows from investing activities were $495,621 and $468,831 for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Cash provided by investing activities increased in 2003, as compared to 2002, primarily due to the receipt of proceeds from Fund VI-VII-VIII Associates in 2003 for the sale of an out parcel of land at Tanglewood Commons on October 7, 2002, which is partially offset by a decline in distributions received from Fund V-VI Associates in order to complete the funding of tenant improvements related to the Hartford lease renewal effective December 2002 and fund HVAC repair costs for the Harford Building.

Cash Flows From Financing Activities

Net cash flows from financing activities were $(255,228) and $(461,292) for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Cash used by financing activities decreased in 2003 from 2002 primarily as a result of the Partnership reserving a portion of operating and investing cash flows in order to fund the remaining tenant improvements and repair costs for the Hartford Building further described above.

Distributions

The Partnership were made distributions to the limited partners holding Class A Units of $0.12 per unit and $0.20 per unit for the quarters ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The 2003 decrease from quarterly distributions in 2002 resulted from the decline in cash flows from financing activities as described above. Such distributions have been made from net cash from operations and distributions received from investments in joint ventures. Distributions accrued for the first quarter of 2003 to the Limited Partners holding Class A Units were paid in May 2003. No cash distributions were made to Limited Partners holding Class B Units.

The General Partners anticipate that future operating cash distributions to the limited partners holding Class A Units may decline in the near term as the Partnership funds its portion of HVAC repairs and tenant improvements related to the renewal of a 10 year lease agreement executed by the sole tenant of the Hartford Building effective December 1, 2002. In order to avoid unrelated business taxable income, the General Partners do not anticipate using third-party borrowings. Instead, the Partnership may reserve future operating distributions in order to fund these leasing and tenant improvement costs.

Sales Proceeds

Rather than distributing net sales proceeds to the limited partners, the Partnership’s share of the net proceeds generated from the sales of the Cherokee Commons property and the outparcel of land at Tanglewood Commons will be held in reserve as the General Partners evaluate the projected capital needs of the Partnership’s investments, as well as the impact to the limited partners of the potential investment in an expansion of Tanglewood Commons. Upon completing such evaluation, the General Partners anticipate distributing the unused portion of the reserves to the partners in accordance with the terms of the Partnership Agreement during 2003.

15

Table of Contents

Capital Resources

The Partnership is an investment vehicle formed for the purpose of acquiring, owning and operating income-producing real properties and has invested all of its funds available for investment. Accordingly, it is unlikely that the Partnership will acquire interests in any additional properties. Other than those mentioned above, the General Partners are unaware of any specific need requiring capital resources. During the first quarter of 2003, American Trust Bank entered into a 10-year lease agreement for approximately 13,000 square feet of the Holcomb Bridge Property. In connection therewith, Fund II-III-VI-VII Associates anticipates funding tenant improvements of approximately $128,000 during the second and third quarters of 2003, of which approximately $33,000 would be attributable to the Partnership.

Contract Obligations and Commitments

On March 18, 2003, four Wells affiliated joint ventures (collectively, the “Seller”, defined below) entered into an agreement (the “Agreement”) to sell five real properties (the “Sale Properties”, defined below) located in Stockbridge, Georgia to an unrelated third-party (the “Purchaser”) for a gross sales price of $23,750,000. Contemporaneously with the Purchaser’s execution and delivery of the Agreement to the Seller, the Purchaser paid a fully refundable earnest money deposit of $250,000 to the designated escrow agent. This transaction is currently subject to a due diligence period of 90 days, during which the Purchaser has the right to terminate the Agreement. Accordingly, there are no assurances that this sale will close.

(d) Related Party Transactions

The Partnership and its joint ventures have entered into agreements with Wells Capital Inc, the general partner of Wells Partners, L.P., and its affiliates, whereby the Partnership or its joint ventures pay certain fees or reimbursements to Wells Capital, Inc. or its affiliates (e.g. property management and leasing fees, administrative salary reimbursements, etc.). See Note 4 to the Partnership’s financial statements included in this report for a discussion of the various related party transactions, agreements, and fees.

(e) Inflation

The real estate market has not been affected significantly by inflation in the past three years due to the relatively low inflation rate. However, there are provisions in the majority of tenant leases, which would protect the Partnership from the impact of inflation. These provisions include reimbursement billings for operating expense pass-through charges, real estate tax and insurance reimbursements on a per square foot basis, or in some cases, annual reimbursement of operating expenses above a certain per square foot allowance. However, due to the long-term nature of the leases, the leases may not reset rental rates frequently enough to cover inflation.

(f) Application of Critical Accounting Policies

The Partnership’s accounting policies have been established to conform with GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to use judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions. These judgments affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. If management’s judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions had been different, it is possible that different accounting policies would have been applied; thus, resulting in a different presentation of the financial statements. Additionally, other companies may utilize different estimates that may impact comparability of the Partnership’s results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses.

Below is a discussion of the accounting policies that management considers to be critical in that they may require complex judgment in their application or require estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain.

16

Table of Contents

Investment in Real Estate Assets

Management is required to make subjective assessments as to the useful lives of its depreciable assets. Management considers the period of future benefit of the asset to determine the appropriate useful lives. These assessments have a direct impact on net income. The estimated useful lives of the Joint Venture’s assets by class are as follows:

In the event that management uses inappropriate useful lives or methods for depreciation, the Partnership’s net income would be misstated.

Valuation of Real Estate Assets

Management continually monitors events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amounts of the real estate assets in which the Partnership has an ownership interest, either directly or through investments in joint ventures, may not be recoverable. When indicators of potential impairment are present which indicate that the carrying amounts of real estate assets may not be recoverable, management assesses the recoverability of the real estate assets by determining whether the carrying value of the real estate assets will be recovered through the undiscounted future operating cash flows expected from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. In the event that such expected undiscounted future cash flows do not exceed the carrying value, management adjusts the real estate assets to the fair value and recognizes an impairment loss. Management has determined that there has been no impairment in the carrying value of real estate assets held by the Partnership to date.

Projections of expected future cash flows requires management to estimate future market rental income amounts subsequent to the expiration of current lease agreements, property operating expenses, discount rates, the number of months it takes to re-lease the property, and the number of years the property is held for investment. The use of inappropriate assumptions in the future cash flow analysis would result in an incorrect assessment of the property’s future cash flows and fair value, and could result in the overstatement of the carrying value of real estate assets held by the joint ventures and net income of the Partnership.

Since the Partnership does not borrow any money, make any foreign investments or invest in any market risk sensitive instruments, it is not subject to risks relating to interest rates, foreign current exchange rate fluctuations or the other market risks contemplated by Item 305 of Regulation S-K.

17

Table of Contents

Within the 90 days prior to the date of this report, the Partnership carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management of Wells Capital, Inc., the corporate general partner of the General Partner of the Partnership, including the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based upon that evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

There were no significant changes in the Partnership’s internal controls or other factors that could significantly affect such controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation.

(THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)

18

Table of Contents

PART II.    OTHER INFORMATION

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

19

Table of Contents

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Leo F. Wells, III, certify that:

20

Table of Contents

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Douglas P. Williams, certify that:

21

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

TO

FIRST QUARTER FORM 10-Q

OF

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND IV, L.P.

22