Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003

OR

For the transition period from                                 to                                 

Commission file number 0-21580

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND V, L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  x No ¨

Table of Contents

FORM 10-Q

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND V, L.P.

(A Georgia Public Limited Partnership)

INDEX

2

Table of Contents

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND V, L.P.

(A Georgia Public Limited Partnership)

BALANCE SHEETS

See accompanying notes.

3

Table of Contents

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND V, L.P.

(A Georgia Public Limited Partnership)

STATEMENTS OF INCOME

See accompanying notes.

4

Table of Contents

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND V, L.P.

(A Georgia Public Limited Partnership)

STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS’ CAPITAL

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002

AND THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2003 (UNAUDITED)

See accompanying notes.

5

Table of Contents

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND V, L.P.

(A Georgia Public Limited Partnership)

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

See accompanying notes.

6

Table of Contents

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND V, L.P

(A Georgia Public Limited Partnership)

CONDENSED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2003 (UNAUDITED)

(a) Organization and Business

Wells Real Estate Fund V, L.P. (the “Partnership”) is a public limited partnership organized on October 25, 1990 under the laws of the state of Georgia. The general partners are Leo F. Wells, III and Wells Partners, L.P. (“Wells Partners”), a Georgia nonpublic limited partnership. The Partnership has two classes of limited partnership interests, Class A and Class B units. Class B limited partners have a one-time right to elect to have all of their units treated as Class A units. Limited partners may vote to, among other things, (a) amend the partnership agreement, subject to certain limitations, (b) change the business purpose or investment objectives of the Partnership, and (c) remove a general partner. A majority vote on any of the above-described matters will bind the Partnership without the concurrence of the general partners. Each limited partnership unit has equal voting rights, regardless of class.

On March 6, 1992, the Partnership commenced an offering of up to $25,000,000 of Class A or Class B limited partnership units ($10.00 per unit) pursuant to a Registration Statement filed on Form S-11 under the Securities Act of 1933. The Partnership did not commence active operations until it received and accepted subscriptions for a minimum of 125,000 units on April 27, 1992. The offering was terminated on March 3, 1993, at which time the Partnership had sold 1,520,967 Class A units and 179,635 Class B units representing capital contributions of $17,006,020 from investors who were admitted to the Partnership as limited partners.

(THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)

7

Table of Contents

The Partnership owns interests in all of its real estate assets through joint ventures with other Wells entities (the “Joint Ventures”). As of March 31, 2003, the Partnership owned interests in the following 5 properties through the affiliated Joint Ventures listed below:

Each of the aforementioned properties was acquired on an all cash basis. For further information regarding the foregoing joint ventures and properties, refer to the report filed for the Partnership on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.

(b) Basis of Presentation

The financial statements of the Partnership have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X, and in accordance with such rules and regulations, do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. The quarterly statements included herein have not been examined by independent auditors. However, in the opinion of the General Partners, the statements for the unaudited interim periods presented include all adjustments that are of a normal and recurring nature and necessary to fairly present the results for those periods. Results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of full year results. For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes included in the Partnership’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.

(c) Allocations of Net Income, Net Loss and Gain on Sale

For the purposes of determining allocations per the Partnership agreement, net income is defined as net income recognized by the Partnership, excluding deductions for depreciation and amortization. Net income, as defined, of the Partnership will be allocated each year in the same proportions that net cash

8

Table of Contents

from operations is distributed to the limited partners holding Class A units and the general partners. To the extent the Partnership’s net income in any year exceeds net cash from operations, it will be allocated 99% to the limited partners and 1% to the general partners.

Net loss, depreciation, and amortization deductions for each fiscal year will be allocated as follows: (a) 99% to the limited partners holding Class B units and 1% to the general partners until their capital accounts are reduced to zero, (b) then to any partner having a positive balance in his/her capital account in an amount not to exceed such positive balance, and (c) thereafter to the general partners.

Gain on the sale or exchange of the Partnership’s properties will be allocated generally in the same manner that the net proceeds from such sale are distributed to partners after the following allocations are made, if applicable: (a) allocations made pursuant to a qualified income offset provision in the partnership agreement, (b) allocations to partners having negative capital accounts until all negative capital accounts have been restored to zero, and (c) allocations to Class B limited partners in amounts equal to deductions for depreciation and amortization previously allocated to them with respect to the specific partnership property sold, but not in excess of the amount of gain on sale recognized by the Partnership with respect to the sale of such property.

(d) Distributions of Net Cash From Operations

Cash available for distribution, as defined by the partnership agreement, is distributed to limited partners quarterly. In accordance with the partnership agreement, distributions are paid first to limited partners holding Class A units until they have received a 10% per annum return on their adjusted capital contributions, as defined. Cash available for distribution is then paid first to the general partners until they have received an amount equal to 10% of distributions. Any remaining cash available for distribution is split between the limited partners holding Class A units and the general partners on a basis of 90% and 10%, respectively. No cash distributions will be made to the limited partners holding Class B units.

(e) Distributions of Sales Proceeds

Upon sales of properties, the net sales proceeds are distributed in the following order:

9

Table of Contents

(a) Basis of Presentation

As of March 31, 2003, the Partnership owned interests in five properties through its ownership in the Joint Ventures. The Partnership does not have control over the operations of the Joint Ventures; however, it does exercise significant influence. Accordingly, the Partnership’s investments in the Joint Ventures are recorded using the equity method of accounting, whereby original investments are recorded at cost and subsequently adjusted for contributions, distributions and net income (loss) attributable to the Partnership. For further information, refer to the report filed for the Partnership on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.

(b) Summary of Operations

The following information summarizes the operations of the Joint Ventures in which the Partnership held ownership interests for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively:

In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” which clarifies the application of Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements,” relating to consolidation of certain entities. FIN 46 will require the identification of the Partnership’s participation in variable interest entities (VIEs), which are defined as entities with a level of invested equity that is not sufficient to fund future activities to permit them to operate on a stand alone basis, or whose equity holders lack certain characteristics of a controlling financial interest. For entities identified as VIEs, FIN 46 sets forth a model to evaluate potential consolidation based on an assessment of which party to the VIE, if any, bears a majority of the exposure to its expected losses, or stands to gain from a majority of its expected returns. FIN 46 is effective for all new VIEs created or acquired after January 31, 2003. For VIEs created or acquired prior to February 1, 2003, the provisions of FIN 46 must be applied for the first interim or annual period beginning after June 15, 2003. FIN 46 also sets forth certain disclosures regarding interests in VIEs that are deemed significant, even if consolidation is not required. As the Joint Ventures do not fall under the definition of VIEs provided above, the Partnership does not believe that the adoption of FIN 46 will result in the consolidation of any previously unconsolidated entities.

10

Table of Contents

In August 2001, SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (effective beginning January 1, 2002) was issued. SFAS No. 144 addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment of long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of and supersedes SFAS No. 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of”. Among other factors, SFAS No. 144 establishes criteria beyond that previously specified in SFAS No. 121 to determine when a long-lived asset is to be considered held for sale. We believe that the adoption of SFAS No. 144 will not have a significant impact on the Partnership’s financial statements.

Management and Leasing Fees

The Partnership entered into a property management and leasing agreement with Wells Management Company, Inc. (“Wells Management”), an affiliate of the general partners. In consideration for supervising the management and leasing of the Partnership’s properties, the joint ventures pay Wells Management management and leasing fees equal to (a) 3% of the gross revenues for management and 3% of the gross revenues for leasing (aggregate maximum of 6%) plus a separate fee for the one-time initial lease-up of newly constructed properties in an amount not to exceed the fee customarily charged in arm’s-length transactions by others rendering similar services in the same geographic area for similar properties or (b) in the case of commercial properties which are leased on a long-term net basis (ten or more years), 1% of the gross revenues except for initial leasing fees equal to 3% of the gross revenues over the first five years of the lease term. For the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, the properties in which the Partnerships owns interests paid management and leasing fees to Wells Management of $54,812 and $50,887, respectively.

Administration Reimbursements

Wells Capital, Inc., an affiliate of the General Partners, perform certain administrative services for the Partnership, such as accounting and other partnership administration, and incur the related expenses. Such expenses are allocated among the various Wells Real Estate Funds based on time spent on each fund by individual administrative personnel. For the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, the Partnership reimbursed $12,919 and $8,838, respectively, to Wells Capital, Inc. and its affiliates for these services.

Conflicts of Interests

The general partners of the Partnership are also general partners of other Wells Real Estate Funds. As such, there may exist conflicts of interest where the general partners in their capacity as general partners of other Wells Real Estate Funds may be in competition with the Partnership in connection with property acquisitions or for tenants in similar geographic markets.

11

Table of Contents

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Partnership’s accompanying financial statements and notes thereto.

(a) Forward Looking Statements

This report contains forward-looking statements, within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including discussion and analysis of the financial condition of the Partnership, anticipated capital expenditures required to complete certain projects, amounts of cash distributions anticipated to be distributed to limited partners in the future and certain other matters. Readers of this Report should be aware that there are various factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from any forward-looking statements made in this report including lease-up risks, inability to obtain new tenants upon expiration of existing leases, and the potential need to fund tenant improvements, leasing commissions or other capital expenditures or lease-up costs out of operating cash flow.

(b) Results of Operations

Gross Revenues

Gross revenues of the Partnership were $104,209 and $165,445 for the three months ended March 31, 2003, and 2002, respectively. The 2003 decrease from 2002 resulted primarily from the corresponding decrease in equity in income of joint ventures as described below.

12

Table of Contents

Equity in Income of Joint Ventures

Gross Revenues of Joint Ventures

Gross revenues of the Joint Ventures in which the Partnership holds an interest decreased in 2003, as compared to 2002, primarily due to a decline in occupancy of the IBM Jacksonville Building, which was 89% occupied as of March 31, 2002 and 74% occupied as of March 31, 2003.

Expenses of Joint Ventures

The expenses of the Joint Ventures in which the Partnership holds an interest increased in 2003, as compared to 2002, primarily due to increases in (i) administrative salaries incurred in connection with evaluating various re-leasing and liquidation strategies for the properties owned the Joint Ventures, and (ii) accounting and legal fees incurred in connection with changing independent auditors in 2002.

Expenses

Expenses of the Partnership were $22,807 and $21,972 for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Expenses increased in 2003 from 2002 primarily as a result of an increase in administrative salaries incurred in connection with evaluating various re-leasing and liquidation strategies for the Partnership’s portfolio of properties.

As a result, net income of the Partnership was $81,402 and $143,473 for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

(c) Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flows From Operating Activities

Net cash flows from operating activities was $(39,249) and ($23,643) for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The 2003 increase in operating cash flows used is primarily attributable to a change in the timing of payment of administrative salaries and bank fees in 2003, as compared to 2002.

Cash Flows From Investing Activities

Net cash flows from investing activities were $145,120 and $295,199 for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The 2003 decrease from 2002 is largely attributable to the corresponding decline in distributions received from (i) Fund V and Fund VI Associates in order to fund tenant improvements and leasing commissions related to the Hartford lease renewal effective December 2002, and (ii) Fund IV and V Associates in order to establish reserves to fund re-leasing costs anticipated during the second half of 2003 for the IBM Jacksonville building, as the IBM Jacksonville lease terminated on April 30, 2003.

Cash Flows From Financing Activities

Net cash flows from financing activities were $(97,901) and $(284,009) for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The 2003 decrease in financing cash flows used is a direct result of the decline in distributions received from joint ventures for the reasons aforementioned.

13

Table of Contents

Distributions

The Partnership made distributions to the limited partners holding Class A units of $0.06 and $0.18 per unit for the quarters ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The 2003 decrease from 2002 resulted from the decline in cash flows from investing activities as described above. Such distributions have been made from net cash from operations and distributions received from investments in joint ventures. No distributions have been made to the limited partners holding Class B units or to the General Partners.

The General Partners anticipate that distributions per unit to limited partners holding Class A Units will decline until the IBM Jacksonville Building is released and the related re-leasing costs have been funded. Distributions accrued for the first quarter of 2003 to the limited partners holding Class A Units were paid in May 2003. No cash distributions were made to limited partners holding Class B Units.

Capital Resources

The Partnership is an investment vehicle formed for the purpose of acquiring, owning and operating income-producing real properties and has invested all of its funds available for investment. Accordingly, it is unlikely that the Partnership will acquire interests in any additional properties. In order to ready the IBM Jacksonville Building for re-leasing, Fund IV-V Associates commenced a lobby and common area renovation project that is anticipated to cost approximately $75,000, of which approximately $35,000 was funding during the first quarter of 2003, and the remainder is expected to be funded during the second quarter of 2003. In addition, Fund IV-V Associates anticipates funding approximately $100,000 for building improvements for the Village Overlook property during the second and third quarter of 2003.

Contract Obligations and Commitments

On March 18, 2003, four Wells affiliated joint ventures (collectively, the “Seller”, defined below) entered into an agreement (the “Agreement”) to sell five real properties (the “Sale Properties”, defined below) located in Stockbridge, Georgia to an unrelated third-party (the “Purchaser”) for a gross sales price of $23,750,000. Contemporaneously with the Purchaser’s execution and delivery of the Agreement to the Seller, the Purchaser paid a fully refundable earnest money deposit of $250,000 to the designated escrow agent. This transaction is currently subject to a due diligence period of 90 days, during which the Purchaser has the right to terminate the Agreement. Accordingly, there are no assurances that this sale will close.

(d) Related Party Transactions

The Partnership and its joint ventures have entered into agreements with Wells Capital, Inc, the general partner of Wells Partners, L.P. and its affiliates, whereby the Partnership or its joint ventures pay certain fees or reimbursements to Wells Capital, Inc. or its affiliates (e.g. property management and leasing fees, administrative salary reimbursements, etc.). See Note 4 to the Partnership’s financial statements included in this report for a discussion of the various related party transactions, agreements, and fees.

(e) Inflation

The real estate market has not been affected significantly by inflation in the past three years due to the relatively low inflation rate. However, there are provisions in the majority of tenant leases, which would protect the Partnership from the impact of inflation. These provisions include reimbursement billings for operating expense pass-through charges, real estate tax and insurance reimbursements on a per square foot basis, or in some cases, annual reimbursement of operating expenses above a certain per square foot allowance. There is no assurance, however, that the Partnership would be able to replace existing leases with new leases at higher base rental rates.

(f) Application of Critical Accounting Policies

The Partnership’s accounting policies have been established to conform to GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to use judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions. These judgments affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting

14

Table of Contents

periods. If management’s judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions had been different, it is possible that different accounting policies would have been applied; thus, resulting in a different presentation of the financial statements. Additionally, other companies may utilize different estimates that may impact comparability of the Partnership’s results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses.

Below is a discussion of the accounting policies that management considers to be critical in that they may require complex judgment in their application or require estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain.

Investment in Real Estate Assets

Management is required to make subjective assessments as to the useful lives of its depreciable assets. Management considers the period of future benefit of the asset to determine the appropriate useful lives. These assessments have a direct impact on net income. The estimated useful lives of the Joint Ventures’ assets by class are as follows:

In the event that management uses inappropriate useful lives or methods for depreciation, the Partnership’s net income would be misstated.

Valuation of Real Estate Assets

Management continually monitors events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amounts of the real estate assets in which the Partnership has an ownership interest, either directly or through investments in joint ventures, may not be recoverable. When indicators of potential impairment are present which indicate that the carrying amounts of real estate assets may not be recoverable, management assesses the recoverability of the real estate assets by determining whether the carrying value of the real estate assets will be recovered through the undiscounted future operating cash flows expected from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. In the event that such expected undiscounted future cash flows do not exceed the carrying value, management adjusts the real estate assets to the fair value and recognizes an impairment loss. Management has determined that there has been no impairment in the carrying value of real estate assets held by the Partnership to date.

Projections of expected future cash flows requires management to estimate future market rental income amounts subsequent to the expiration of current lease agreements, property operating expenses, discount rates, the number of months it takes to re-lease the property, and the number of years the property is held for investment. The use of inappropriate assumptions in the future cash flow analysis would result in an incorrect assessment of the property’s future cash flows and fair value, and could result in the overstatement of the carrying value of real estate assets held by the joint ventures and net income of the Partnership.

15

Table of Contents

Since the Partnership does not borrow any money, make any foreign investments or invest in any market risk sensitive instruments, it is not subject to risks relating to interest rates, foreign current exchange rate fluctuations or the other market risks contemplated by Item 305 of Regulation S-K.

Within the 90 days prior to the date of this report, the Partnership carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management of Wells Capital, Inc., the corporate general partner of the General Partner of the Partnership, including the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based upon that evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

There were no significant changes in the Partnership’s internal controls or other factors that could significantly affect such controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation.

16

Table of Contents

PART II.    OTHER INFORMATION

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

17

Table of Contents

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Leo F. Wells, III, certify that:

18

Table of Contents

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Douglas P. Williams, certify that:

19

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

TO

FIRST QUARTER FORM 10-Q

OF

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND V, L.P.

20