Back to GetFilings.com



Table of Contents

 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 


 

FORM 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

x   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

       For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2002

 

OR

 

¨   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

       For the transition period from                          to                         

 

Commission File Number: 000-18674

 


 

MAPICS, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Georgia

 

04-2711580

(State or other

jurisdiction of incorporation)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

 

1000 Windward Concourse Parkway, Suite 100

Alpharetta, Georgia 30005

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(678) 319-8000

(Registrant’s telephone number)

 


 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  x  No  ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes  x  No  ¨

 

The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding at February 5, 2003 was 18,446,007.

 



Table of Contents

 

MAPICS, Inc.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

For the Quarterly Period Ended December 31, 2002

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Item

Number


       

Page Number


    

PART I–FINANCIAL INFORMATION

    

1.

  

Financial Statements:

    
    

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2002 (unaudited) and September 30, 2002

  

3

    

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 (unaudited)

  

4

    

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 (unaudited)

  

5

    

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited )

  

6

2.

  

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

  

13

3.

  

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

  

25

4.

  

Controls and Procedures

  

26

    

PART I–OTHER INFORMATION

    

5.

  

Other Information

  

26

6.

  

Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

  

30

    

Signature

  

31

    

Section 302 Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

  

32

 

2


Table of Contents

 

PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1: Financial Statements

 

MAPICS, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

    

December 31, 2002


    

September 30, 2002


 
    

(Unaudited)

        

ASSETS

                 

Current assets:

                 

Cash and cash equivalents

  

$

24,628

 

  

$

23,661

 

Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $1,554 at December 31, 2002 and $1,734 at September 30, 2002

  

 

21,970

 

  

 

25,428

 

Deferred royalties

  

 

7,088

 

  

 

7,581

 

Deferred commissions

  

 

8,627

 

  

 

8,822

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  

 

2,769

 

  

 

3,127

 

Deferred income taxes, net

  

 

3,731

 

  

 

3,600

 

    


  


Total current assets

  

 

68,813

 

  

 

72,219

 

Property and equipment, net

  

 

3,382

 

  

 

3,596

 

Computer software costs, net

  

 

16,015

 

  

 

16,739

 

Goodwill and other intangible assets, net

  

 

6,866

 

  

 

7,056

 

Other non-current assets, net

  

 

9,024

 

  

 

8,500

 

    


  


Total assets

  

$

104,100

 

  

$

108,110

 

    


  


LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

                 

Current liabilities:

                 

Accounts payable

  

$

2,888

 

  

$

3,338

 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

  

 

23,947

 

  

 

25,087

 

Restructuring reserve, current

  

 

1,250

 

  

 

1,300

 

Deferred license revenue

  

 

18,947

 

  

 

18,893

 

Deferred services revenue

  

 

36,966

 

  

 

40,969

 

    


  


Total current liabilities

  

 

83,998

 

  

 

89,587

 

Restructuring reserve, non-current

  

 

2,176

 

  

 

2,298

 

Other non-current liabilities

  

 

1,193

 

  

 

1,265

 

    


  


Total liabilities

  

 

87,367

 

  

 

93,150

 

    


  


Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

Shareholders’ equity:

                 

Preferred stock, $1.00 par value; 1,000 shares authorized

                 

Series D convertible preferred stock, 125 shares issued and outstanding (liquidation preference of $9,420)

  

 

125

 

  

 

125

 

Series E convertible preferred stock, 50 shares issued and outstanding (liquidation preference of $3,768)

  

 

50

 

  

 

50

 

Common stock, $0.01 par value; 90,000 shares authorized, 20,370 shares issued and 18,431 shares outstanding at December 31, 2002; 20,370 shares issued and 18,390 shares outstanding at September 30, 2002

  

 

204

 

  

 

204

 

Additional paid-in capital

  

 

63,157

 

  

 

63,129

 

Accumulated deficit

  

 

(31,613

)

  

 

(33,029

)

Restricted stock compensation

  

 

(209

)

  

 

(304

)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

  

 

(16

)

  

 

(62

)

Treasury stock-at cost, 1,939 shares at December 31, 2002 and 1,980 shares at September 30, 2002

  

 

(14,965

)

  

 

(15,153

)

    


  


Total shareholders’ equity

  

 

16,733

 

  

 

14,960

 

    


  


Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

  

$

104,100

 

  

$

108,110

 

    


  


 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

 

MAPICS, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

 

    

Three Months Ended

December 31,


 
    

2002


    

2001


 

Revenue:

                 

License

  

$

8,470

 

  

$

11,673

 

Services

  

 

22,582

 

  

 

21,620

 

    


  


Total revenue

  

 

31,052

 

  

 

33,293

 

    


  


Operating expenses:

                 

Cost of license revenue

  

 

3,647

 

  

 

4,022

 

Cost of services revenue

  

 

8,057

 

  

 

8,617

 

Selling and marketing

  

 

10,450

 

  

 

8,309

 

Product development

  

 

3,576

 

  

 

4,875

 

General and administrative

  

 

3,104

 

  

 

4,081

 

    


  


Total operating expenses

  

 

28,834

 

  

 

29,904

 

    


  


Income from operations

  

 

2,218

 

  

 

3,389

 

Other:

                 

Interest income

  

 

76

 

  

 

138

 

Interest expense

  

 

(46

)

  

 

(505

)

    


  


Income before income tax expense

  

 

2,248

 

  

 

3,022

 

Income tax expense

  

 

832

 

  

 

1,163

 

    


  


Net income

  

$

1,416

 

  

$

1,859

 

    


  


Net income per common share (basic)

  

$

0.08

 

  

$

0.10

 

    


  


Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (basic)

  

 

18,389

 

  

 

18,311

 

    


  


Net income per common share (diluted)

  

$

0.07

 

  

$

0.09

 

    


  


Weighted average number of common shares and common equivalent shares outstanding (diluted)

  

 

20,469

 

  

 

20,402

 

    


  


 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

MAPICS, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

 

    

Three Months Ended

December 31,


 
    

2002


    

2001


 

Cash flows from operating activities:

                 

Net income

  

$

1,416

 

  

$

1,859

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

                 

Depreciation

  

 

543

 

  

 

615

 

Amortization of computer software costs

  

 

1,529

 

  

 

1,487

 

Amortization of intangible assets

  

 

190

 

  

 

190

 

Amortization of debt issue costs

  

 

33

 

  

 

171

 

Provision for bad debts

  

 

166

 

  

 

572

 

Deferred income taxes

  

 

143

 

  

 

1,277

 

Other non-cash items, net

  

 

119

 

  

 

147

 

    


  


    

 

4,139

 

  

 

6,318

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

                 

Accounts receivable

  

 

3,292

 

  

 

6,599

 

Deferred royalties

  

 

493

 

  

 

505

 

Deferred commissions

  

 

195

 

  

 

970

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  

 

359

 

  

 

(76

)

Other non-current assets

  

 

(179

)

  

 

37

 

Accounts payable

  

 

(450

)

  

 

930

 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

  

 

(1,095

)

  

 

(3,203

)

Restructuring reserve, current and non-current

  

 

(172

)

  

 

—  

 

Deferred license revenue

  

 

54

 

  

 

(4,053

)

Deferred service revenue

  

 

(4,003

)

  

 

(1,208

)

Other non-current liabilities

  

 

(82

)

  

 

—  

 

    


  


Net cash provided by operating activities

  

 

2,551

 

  

 

6,819

 

    


  


Cash flows from investing activities:

                 

Purchases of property and equipment

  

 

(329

)

  

 

(215

)

Additions to computer software costs

  

 

(805

)

  

 

(624

)

Purchases of computer software

  

 

—  

 

  

 

(49

)

Acquisition

  

 

(653

)

  

 

—  

 

    


  


Net cash used for investing activities

  

 

(1,787

)

  

 

(888

)

    


  


Cash flows from financing activities:

                 

Principal repayments of long-term debt

  

 

—  

 

  

 

(4,680

)

Proceeds from stock options exercised

  

 

17

 

  

 

—  

 

Proceeds from employee stock purchases

  

 

195

 

  

 

220

 

Acquisition of treasury stock

  

 

(9

)

        

Payment of debt issue costs

  

 

—  

 

  

 

(96

)

    


  


Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities

  

 

203

 

  

 

(4,556

)

    


  


Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

  

 

967

 

  

 

1,375

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

  

 

23,661

 

  

 

18,077

 

    


  


Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

  

$

24,628

 

  

$

19,452

 

    


  


 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

5


Table of Contents

MAPICS, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

(1) Basis of Presentation

 

Except for the balance sheet as of September 30, 2002, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited; however, in our opinion, these condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting of only normal, recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of the dates and for the periods indicated.

 

We have prepared the accompanying financial statements pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. As permitted by the rules of the SEC applicable to quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, these financial statements are condensed and consolidated, consisting of the condensed financial statements of MAPICS, Inc. and our subsidiaries. We eliminated all significant intercompany accounts and transactions in the consolidation. We also have condensed these notes, and they do not contain all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles. While we believe that the disclosures presented are adequate to make these condensed consolidated financial statements not misleading, you should read them in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002.

 

We operate on a fiscal year ending September 30th. The term “fiscal 2001” refers to our fiscal year ended September 30, 2001, the term “fiscal 2002” refers to our fiscal year ended September 30, 2002, and the term “fiscal 2003” refers to our fiscal year ending September 30, 2003. The results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for a full year.

 

(2) Revenue Recognition

 

We generate revenues primarily by licensing software, providing software support and maintenance and providing professional services to our customers. We record all revenues in accordance with the guidance provided by Statement of Position (SOP), 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition,” SOP 98-9, “Modification of SOP 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition, with Respect to Certain Transactions,” SOP 81-1, “Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Product-Type Contracts,” and AICPA Technical Practice Aid (TPA) 5100.53, “Fair Value of PCS in a Short-Term Time-Based License and Software Revenue Recognition.”

 

Software License and Support Revenue

 

We generate a significant portion of total revenue from licensing software, which we conduct principally through our global network of independent affiliates. We license our software products under license agreements, which the ultimate customer typically executes directly with us rather than with the affiliate. Our license agreements are either annual renewable term license agreements or perpetual license agreements.

 

6


Table of Contents

 

We generally license our software products that operate on the IBM iSeries platform under annual renewable term licenses. When we first license an iSeries product, we receive both an initial license fee and an annual license fee. Our customers may renew the license for an additional one-year period upon payment of the annual license fee. We recognize the initial license fees under these annual renewable term licenses ratably as license revenue over the initial license period, which is generally twelve months. In addition, payment of the annual license fee entitles the customer to available software support for another year. If the annual license fee is not paid, the customer is no longer entitled to use the software and we may terminate the agreement. We record this annual license fee as services revenue ratably over the term of the agreement.

 

Under our perpetual license agreements, we record both an initial license fee and an annual support fee. We record initial license fees as license revenue and typically recognize revenue when the following criteria are met:

 

(1) the signing of a license agreement between us and the ultimate customer;

 

(2) delivery of the software to the customer or to a location designated by the customer;

 

(3) fees are fixed or determinable; and

 

(4) determination that collection of the related receivable is probable.

 

The annual support fee, which is typically paid annually in advance, entitles the customer to receive twelve months of support services, as available. We record these annual support fees as services revenue and recognize this revenue ratably over the term of the agreement.

 

The license agreements for our software products include a limited express warranty. The warranty provides that the product, in its unaltered form, will perform substantially in accordance with our related documentation for period of up to 90 days from delivery. If the product does not perform substantially in accordance with the documentation, we may repair or replace the product or terminate the license and refund the license fees paid for the product. All other warranties are expressly disclaimed. In addition to this warranty and in return for the payment of annual license or support fees, we also provide customers with available annual maintenance services that include electronic usage support and defect repairs. To the extent that product defects arise, most are identified long after the product has been installed and used and after the warranty period has expired. In most instances, a product workaround and repair can be made and such repairs are delivered as part of maintenance services. Historically, we have not received any material warranty claims related to our products, and we have no reason believe that we will receive any material claims in the future.

 

Professional Services Revenue

 

Under the terms of our license agreements, our customers are responsible for installation and training. Our professional services organization or, in many instances, the affiliates provide our customers with the consulting and implementation services relating to our products. We provide our professional services under services agreements, and we charge for them separately under time and materials arrangements or, in some circumstances, under fixed price arrangements. The professional services that we provide are not essential to the functionality of our delivered products. We recognize revenues from time and materials arrangements as the services are performed, provided that the customer has a contractual obligation to pay, the fee is non-refundable, and collection is probable. Under a fixed price arrangement, we recognize revenue on the basis of the estimated percentage of completion of service provided. We recognize changes in estimate in the period in which they are determined. We recognize provisions for losses, if any, in the period in which they first become probable and reasonably estimable.

 

We also offer educational courses and training materials to our customers and affiliates. These consulting and implementation services and education courses are included in services revenue and revenue is recognized when services are provided.

 

(3) Computation and Presentation of Net Income Per Common Share

 

We apply Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 128, “Earnings Per Share,” which requires us to present “basic” and “diluted” net income per common share for all periods presented in the statements of operations. We compute basic net income per common share, which excludes dilution, by dividing income available

 

7


Table of Contents

to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net income per common share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if holders of our preferred stock, common stock options, common stock warrants and contingently issuable stock converted or exercised their holdings into common stock that then shared in our earnings.

 

The weighted average number of common shares and common equivalent shares outstanding that we used to calculate diluted net income per share includes:

 

    the weighted average number of common shares outstanding; plus

 

    the weighted average number of common equivalent shares from the assumed conversion of preferred stock and the assumed exercise of dilutive stock options, common stock warrants, and contingently issuable stock.

 

The following table presents the calculations of basic and diluted net income per common share or common share equivalent (in thousands, except per share data):

 

    

Three Months Ended

December 31,


    

2002


  

2001


Basic net income per common share:

             

Net income

  

$

1,416

  

$

1,859

    

  

Weighted average common shares outstanding

  

 

18,389

  

 

18,311

    

  

Basic net income per common share

  

$

0.08

  

$

0.10

    

  

Diluted net income per common share:

             

Net income

  

$

1,416

  

$

1,859

    

  

Weighted average common shares outstanding

  

 

18,389

  

 

18,311

Common share equivalents:

             

Convertible preferred stock

  

 

1,750

  

 

1,750

Common stock options

  

 

250

  

 

237

Contingently issuable stock

  

 

80

  

 

104

    

  

Weighted average common shares and common equivalent shares outstanding

  

 

20,469

  

 

20,402

    

  

Diluted net income per common share

  

$

0.07

  

$

0.09

    

  

 

(4) Comprehensive Income

 

The components of comprehensive income were as follows (in thousands):

 

    

Three Months Ended

December 31,


 
    

2002


    

2001


 

Net income

  

$

1,416

    

$

1,859

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes:

                 

Foreign currency translation

  

 

46

    

 

(107

)

    

    


Comprehensive income

  

$

1,462

    

$

1,752

 

    

    


 

(5) Income Taxes

 

The reported income tax expense for the three months ended December 31, 2002 was calculated based on a rate of 37.0%. The reported income tax expense differs from the expected income tax expense calculated by applying the federal statutory rate of 35.0% to our income before income tax expense principally due to the impact of state and foreign income taxes.

 

8


Table of Contents

 

(6)   Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

 

We adopted SFAS 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” on October 1, 2001. Accordingly, we discontinued periodic amortization of goodwill. Goodwill will be assessed at least annually for impairment by applying a fair-value-based test.

 

Intangible assets that have finite useful lives will continue to be amortized over their estimated useful lives. Our intangible assets consist principally of tradenames, trademarks, and installed customer base and affiliate network, and all are considered to have finite lives. The gross carrying amount of intangible assets as of December 31, 2002 was $8.8 million with a balance of $5.6 million in accumulated amortization. The amortization of intangible assets for the three months ended December 31, 2002 was $190,000.

 

Amortized Intangible Assets (in thousands):

 

      

As of December 31, 2002


      

Gross Carrying

Amount


  

Accumulated

Amortization


    

Net Carrying
Amount


Installed customer base and affiliate network

    

$

7,934

  

$

(4,770

)

  

$

3,164

Tradenames and trademarks

    

 

856

  

 

(843

)

  

 

13

      

  


  

Total

    

$

8,790

  

$

(5,613

)

  

$

3,177

      

  


  

 

The weighted average amortization lives of the installed customer base and affiliate network and of the tradenames and trademarks is 13 years and 10 years, respectively.

 

Aggregate Amortization Expense (in thousands):

 

      

Three Months
Ended

December 31,
2002


Aggregate amortization expense

    

$

190

      

 

Estimated Amortization Expense for the Fiscal Years Ended (in thousands):

 

September 30, 2003

  

$

709

September 30, 2004

  

$

673

September 30, 2005

  

$

673

September 30, 2006

  

$

673

September 30, 2007

  

$

470

 

The balance of goodwill at December 31, 2002 was $3.7 million. There were no changes to the carrying amount of goodwill during the three months ended December 31, 2002.

 

(7) Restructuring Costs

 

On January 15, 2002, we announced a five-year agreement with an offshore information technology services company to perform a variety of our ongoing product development activities. The agreement was a contributing factor in a planned reduction of our worldwide workforce by approximately 12% by June 30, 2002. The restructuring charge of $4.7 million during fiscal 2002 included $3.7 million related to the abandonment of excess office space and $1.0 million related to employee severance and related costs for approximately 65 employees, primarily product development and support personnel.

 

9


Table of Contents

 

The major components of the remaining restructuring accrual at December 31, 2002 were as follows (in thousands):

 

      

Accrued

Restructuring Costs at
September 30, 2002


  

Amounts
Utilized


      

Accrued

Restructuring Costs at
December 31, 2002


Cost of abandonment of excess space and other

    

$

3,573

  

$

(147

)

    

$

3,426

Employee severance and related costs

    

 

25

  

 

(25

)

    

 

—  

      

  


    

      

$

3,598

  

$

(172

)

    

$

3,426

      

  


    

 

We expect future cash expenditures related to these restructuring activities to be approximately $3.4 million. We expect to pay approximately $1.2 million within the twelve-month period ending December 31, 2003, and we therefore have included this amount in current liabilities.

 

As shown in the table above, our restructuring liability is principally comprised of the estimated excess lease and related costs associated with vacated office space. We could incur additional restructuring charges or reverse prior charges accordingly in the event that the underlying assumptions used to develop our estimates of excess lease costs change, such as the timing and the amount of any sublease income. Additionally, as discussed in note (10), we have a pending business combination with Frontstep, Inc. that we expect to close on February 18, 2003. Depending on the impact of our acquisition of Frontstep, market conditions for office space and our ability to secure a suitable subtenant and sublease for the space, which to date we have not secured, we may revise our estimates of the excess lease costs and the timing and amount of sublease income and, as a result, incur additional charges or credits to our restructuring liability as appropriate.

 

(8) Contingent Liabilities

 

In March 2000, we acquired an education business. In exchange for the business, we issued 106,668 shares of restricted common stock. If, on March 1, 2003, the price per share of our common stock is less than $18.75, we must pay additional consideration equal to the difference between $18.75 and the quoted market price multiplied by the number of shares of common stock issued at acquisition that the sellers still hold on March 1, 2003. If the closing market price on March 1, 2003 is $7.00 per share, the value of the additional consideration would be approximately $1.3 million. As the stock price at March 1, 2003 is not known this estimate is subject to change. We may elect to pay all or a portion of this additional consideration with shares of common stock and any remainder in cash. The effect of this additional consideration will be to increase our goodwill. We will review this additional goodwill for impairment, and we anticipate that this review will indicate that the goodwill is impaired, which will result in a charge to expense for the three months ended March 31, 2003.

 

(9) Operating Segments and Geographic Information

 

We have one operating segment that provides software and services to manufacturing enterprises worldwide. Our principal administrative, marketing, product development and support operations are located in the United States. Areas of operation outside of North America include Europe, Middle East and Africa, or EMEA, and Latin America and Asia Pacific, or LAAP.

 

We regularly prepare and evaluate separate financial information for each of our principal geographic areas, including 1) North America, 2) EMEA and 3) LAAP. In evaluating financial performance, we focus on operating profit as a measure of a geographic area’s profit or loss. Operating profit for this purpose is income before interest, taxes and allocation of certain corporate expenses. We include our corporate division in the presentation of reportable segment information because some of the income and expenses of this division are not allocated separately to the operating segments.

 

10


Table of Contents

 

The following table includes interim financial information for the three months ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 related to our operating segment and geographic areas. The information presented below may not be indicative of results if the geographic areas were independent organizations (in thousands).

 

    

North

America


  

EMEA


  

LAAP


    

Corporate


    

Total


 

Three Months Ended December 31, 2002:

                                        

Revenues from unaffiliated customers

  

$

23,882

  

$

4,962

  

$

2,208

 

  

$

—  

 

  

$

31,052

 

    

  

  


  


  


Income (loss) from operations

  

$

2,334

  

$

621

  

$

234

 

  

$

(971

)

  

$

2,218

 

    

  

  


  


        

Interest income

                                  

 

76

 

Interest expense

                                  

 

(46

)

                                    


Income before income tax expense

                                  

$

2,248

 

                                    


Three Months Ended December 31, 2001:

                                        

Revenues from unaffiliated customers

  

$

24,284

  

$

6,828

  

$

2,181

 

  

$

—  

 

  

$

33,293

 

    

  

  


  


  


Income (loss) from operations

  

$

3,373

  

$

1,750

  

$

(112

)

  

$

(1,622

)

  

$

3,389

 

    

  

  


  


        

Interest income

                                  

 

138

 

Interest expense

                                  

 

(505

)

                                    


Loss before income tax expense

                                  

$

3,022

 

                                    


 

(10) Pending Business Combinations

 

On November 25, 2002, we and Frontstep, Inc. announced that we had entered into a definitive merger agreement pursuant to which we will acquire Frontstep. Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, shareholders of Frontstep, including holders of Frontstep’s Series A Convertible Participating Preferred Stock, will receive, in the aggregate, 4.2 million shares of MAPICS common stock in exchange for all of the outstanding Frontstep shares and we will assume up to $21.5 million of Frontstep’s debt as well as certain outstanding stock options and warrants. Frontstep shareholders will receive 0.300846 MAPICS shares for each share of Frontstep common stock held as of the effective time of the merger. Closing, which is expected to occur on February 18, 2003, remains subject to certain closing conditions including, but not limited to, approval of the acquisition by MAPICS and Frontstep shareholders. In connection with the merger agreement, Frontstep officers, directors and certain shareholders, including all holders of the preferred stock, have entered into agreements to vote shares held by them in favor of the proposed transaction. Pursuant to these voting agreements, shareholders expected to hold a majority of the voting shares of Frontstep common stock as of the record date have committed to vote their shares in favor of the transaction. Under Ohio law, the transaction must be approved by the holders of at least two-thirds of the voting power of Frontstep. The proposed merger is intended to qualify as a tax-free reorganization pursuant to Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code.

 

As part of the integration of the two companies, we will be reviewing and making changes to the personnel and facilities structures of the combined entity as well as reviewing and eliminating possible redundancies in our software offerings. We expect to incur expenses in future periods related to these acquisition and restructuring activities.

 

Additionally, we have signed a commitment letter for a $30.0 million syndicated credit facility, the proceeds of which will be used to repay the amounts of debt assumed from Frontstep in the business combination. We anticipate closing on this new credit facility on February 18, 2003.

 

(11) Recently Issued or Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

 

In July 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.” This statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring).” SFAS No. 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal

 

11


Table of Contents

 

activity be recognized and measured initially at fair value only when the liability is incurred. SFAS No. 146 is effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002, with early application encouraged. We will apply SFAS No. 146 to any exit or disposal activities that we may enter into in future periods.

 

In November 2002, the FASB reached a consensus on EITF Issue 00-21, “Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables” (the Issue). The guidance in this Issue is effective for revenue arrangements entered into in fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2003. The Issue addresses certain aspects of the accounting by a vendor for arrangements under which it will perform multiple revenue-generating activities. Specifically, the Issue addresses how to determine whether an arrangement involving multiple deliverables contains more than one earnings process and, if it does, how to divide the arrangement into separate units of accounting consistent with the identified earning processes for revenue recognition purposes. The Issue also addresses how arrangement consideration should be measured and allocated to the separate units of accounting in the arrangement. We currently follow the appropriate pronouncement as discussed in note 2 and anticipate the Issue to have no significant impact on the results of our operations, financial position, or cash flows.

 

In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others.” This Interpretation clarifies the requirements of SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies,” relating to guarantor’s accounting for, and disclosure of, the issuance of certain types of guarantees. This Interpretation is intended to improve the comparability of financial reporting by requiring identical accounting for guarantees issued with a separately identified premium and guarantees issued without a separately identified premium. The Interpretation’s provisions for initial recognition and measurement are required on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The disclosure requirements are effective for financial statements of both interim and annual periods that ended after December 15, 2002. We have provided the required disclosures related to our policy on product warranties and contingent consideration arising from acquisitions in notes 2 and 8 of this Form 10-Q. The inclusion of the required disclosures had no significant impact on the results of our operations, financial position, or cash flows.

 

In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure-an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123.” This Statement amends FASB Statement No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, the Statement amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. The amendments pertaining to the alternative methods of transition are effective for financial statements for fiscal years ended after December 15, 2002. The amendments to the disclosure requirements are effective for financial reports containing condensed financial statements for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2002, with early application encouraged. We apply Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and related Interpretations in accounting for our stock option plans and our employee stock purchase plan and the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS No. 123. We plan to adopt the amended interim disclosure requirements during the quarter ending March 31, 2003. We anticipate that the adoption of the additional disclosure requirement will not have a significant impact on the results of our operations, financial position or cash flows.

 

In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. (FIN) 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.” This interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements,” addresses consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities which possess certain characteristics. The Interpretation requires that if a business enterprise has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity, the assets, liabilities, and results of the activities of the variable interest entity must be included in the consolidated financial statements with those of the business enterprise. This Interpretation applies immediately to variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003 and to variable interest entities in which an enterprise obtains an interest after that date. We do not have any ownership in any variable interest entities as of December 31, 2003. We will apply the consolidation requirement of FIN 46 in future periods if we should own any interest in any variable interest entity.

 

12


Table of Contents

 

ITEM 2: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and notes contained in “Item 1. Financial Statements” in Part I of this report and our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002 filed with the SEC as part of our Annual Report on Form 10-K report for that fiscal year. The following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements relating to our future financial performance, business strategy, financing plans and other future events that involve uncertainties and risks. Our actual results could differ materially from the results anticipated by these forward-looking statements as a result of many known and unknown factors that are beyond our ability to control or predict, including but not limited to those discussed in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Factors Affecting Future Performance” contained in the above-referenced Form 10-K. The cautionary statements made in that Form 10-K are applicable to all related forward-looking statements wherever they appear in this report. See also “Special Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in “Item 1. Business” of that Form 10-K.

 

Overview

 

We are a global developer of extended enterprise applications that principally focuses on manufacturing establishments in discrete and batch-process industries. Our solutions enable manufacturers around the world to compete better by streamlining their business processes, maximizing their organizational resources, and extending their enterprises beyond the four walls of their factory for secure collaboration with their value chain partners.

 

Our flagship solutions include two enterprise resource planning foundations that streamline business processes for manufacturing, customer service, engineering, supply chain planning and financial reporting. The solutions support international and multi-site operations on a variety of platforms, including the IBM eServer iSeries, Windows NT, UNIX and Linux. We also offer supply chain management, collaborative commerce and enterprise asset management systems and functionality designed to enable companies to link members of their supply chain to send and receive valuable real-time information to improve business decision-making at all levels.

 

We generate a significant portion of our total revenue from licensing software, which is conducted principally through our global network of independent affiliates. The affiliates provide the principal channel through which we license our software. However, the ultimate customer typically executes a license agreement directly with us rather than the affiliate. We currently offer software products under an annual renewable term license or a perpetual license depending on the type of product purchased. Under our annual renewable term license, the customer pays an initial license fee and an annual license fee for the right to use the software over the initial license period, typically twelve months. Our customers may renew the license for additional one-year periods upon payment of the annual license fee in subsequent years. The annual renewable term license agreements are executed in most cases with the purchase of our IBM iSeries platform products. Under a perpetual license, our customer pays an initial license fee for the ongoing right to use the software.

 

When we first license an iSeries product, we receive both an initial license fee and an annual license fee. In accordance with TPA 5100.53, we recognize the initial license fee as license revenue ratably over the initial license period, which is generally twelve months. In addition, customers must pay an annual license fee, which entitles the customer to continuing use of the software and customer support services as available. We record these annual license fees as services revenue and recognize this revenue ratably over twelve months. If a customer does not pay its annual license fee the following year, it is no longer entitled to use our software and we may terminate the agreement. We believe this licensing arrangement provides a source of recurring revenue from our installed base of iSeries customers. Additional software products or applications are not included as part of the annual license fee and are available for an additional initial and annual license fee.

 

        With regard to our ERP for Extended Systems products, we generally license them on a perpetual basis. Customers must pay an initial license fee and an annual support fee in the first year. We record initial license fees for perpetual licenses as license revenue and typically recognize them upon delivery of the software to the ultimate customer, provided collection is probable. The annual support fee entitles the customer to receive annual support services, as available. We record these fees as services revenue and recognize this revenue ratably over the term of the periodic agreement.

 

13


Table of Contents

 

Pending Acquisition of Frontstep, Inc.

 

On November 25, 2002, we and Frontstep announced the signing of a definitive agreement for MAPICS to acquire Frontstep. Frontstep is a publicly traded (NASDAQ/NM:FSTP) manufacturing application solution provider headquartered in Columbus, Ohio. Pursuant to the definitive agreement, terms of the acquisition include MAPICS’ purchase of all of Frontstep’s shares in exchange for 4.2 million shares of MAPICS common stock and the assumption by us of up to $21.5 million of Frontstep’s debt as well as certain outstanding stock options and warrants. Frontstep shareholders will receive 0.300846 MAPICS shares for each share of Frontstep common stock held. Closing, which is expected to occur on February 18, 2003, is subject to certain conditions, including the approval of the transaction by MAPICS and Frontstep shareholders. Furthermore, we have signed a commitment letter for a $30 million syndicated credit facility, the proceeds of which will be used to repay the Frontstep debt assumed in the business combinations. We anticipate closing that facility on February 18, 2003.

 

As a result of the transaction, both MAPICS and Frontstep customers will be served by a much larger manufacturing-focused global company that can leverage a larger combined customer base with complementary offerings and new sales channels. The combined company, which will market offerings from both companies under the MAPICS brand, expects to leverage Frontstep’s investment in delivering SyteLine 7 on Microsoft.NET and to continue MAPICS’ success on the IBM platform while sustaining active product development for each. In addition, the combined company will benefit from a more balanced sales strategy with both larger direct and affiliate channels serving the global manufacturing market.

 

As part of the integration of the two companies, we will be reviewing and making changes to the personnel and facilities structures of the combined entity as well as reviewing and eliminating possible redundancies in our software offerings. We expect to incur expenses in future periods related to these acquisition and restructuring activities.

 

Results of Operations

 

Three Months Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to Three Months Ended December 31, 2001

 

Summary. For the three months ended December 31, 2002, we reported net income of $1.4 million, or $0.07 per share (diluted), compared to net income of $1.9 million, or $0.09 per share (diluted), for the three months ended December 31, 2001. For the three months ended December 31, 2002, total revenue decreased $2.2 million or 7% from the year earlier quarter. Operating expenses decreased $1.1 million or 4% for the three months ended December 31, 2002 compared to the prior year quarter.

 

14


Table of Contents

 

The following table presents our statements of operations data as a percentage of total revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001:

 

    

Three Months Ended

December 31,


 
    

2002


      

2001


 

Revenue:

               

License

  

27.3

%

    

35.1

%

Services

  

72.7

 

    

64.9

 

    

    

Total revenue

  

100.0

 

    

100.0

 

    

    

Operating expenses:

               

Cost of license revenue

  

11.7

 

    

12.1

 

Cost of services revenue

  

26.0

 

    

25.9

 

Selling and marketing

  

33.7

 

    

25.0

 

Product development

  

11.5

 

    

14.6

 

General and administrative

  

10.0

 

    

12.3

 

    

    

Total operating expenses

  

92.9

 

    

89.9

 

    

    

Income from operations

  

7.1

 

    

10.1

 

Interest income

  

0.2

 

    

0.4

 

Interest expense

  

(0.1

)

    

(1.5

)

    

    

Income before income tax expense

  

7.2

 

    

9.0

 

Income tax expense

  

2.7

 

    

3.5

 

    

    

Net income

  

4.5

%

    

5.5

%

    

    

 

Revenue. Total revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2002 was $31.1 million, a decrease of $2.2 million or 7%, compared to total revenue of $33.3 million for the three months ended December 31, 2001. The decrease in total revenue was primarily due to a decrease in license revenue recognized during the three months ended December 31, 2002 as compared to the three months ended December 31, 2001.

 

License revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2002 was $8.5 million, a decrease of $3.2 million or 27%, compared to license revenue of $11.7 million for the three months ended December 31, 2001. During the three months ended December 31, 2002, our license revenue included license revenue from time-based license contracts of $7.0 million recognized ratably, with the remainder recorded from license revenue recognized upon delivery under our perpetual licenses. In comparison, during the three months ended December 31, 2001, our license revenue included license revenue from time-based contracts of $9.0 million recognized ratably, with the remainder recorded from license revenue recognized upon delivery under our perpetual licenses.

 

Licensing activity during the three months ended December 31, 2002 also decreased. We signed $7.8 million in license contracts during the three months ended December 31, 2002 compared to $8.6 million in the previous year. We deferred $6.3 million of time-based license revenue to be recognized ratably in future periods during the three months ended December 31, 2002 compared to $6.0 million in the year earlier period. We believe the decreased licensing activity is attributable to the continued economic slowdown, its effect on manufacturers and many customers and prospects continuing to delay purchases or implementations due to economic uncertainty.

 

Services revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2002 was $22.6 million compared to $21.6 million for the three months ended December 31, 2001, an increase of $1.0 million or 4%. The increase was mainly due to an increase in maintenance and support services revenue, partially offset by a decrease in our professional services revenues in conjunction with the lower licensing activity.

 

        Our operations are conducted principally in (1) North America, (2) the Europe, Middle East and Africa region, or EMEA, and (3) the Latin America and the Asia Pacific regions, or LAAP. During the three months ended December 31, 2002, license revenue in EMEA decreased as a percentage of total license revenue to 18.9% compared to 29.7% in the year earlier period. The decrease as a percentage of total license revenue was related to a perpetual license contract in excess of $1.0 million from a strategic customer in EMEA during the three months ended

 

15


Table of Contents

December 31, 2001. The following table shows the percentage of license revenue, services revenue, and total revenue contributed by each of our primary geographic markets:

 

    

License Revenue

Three Months Ended

December 31,


    

Services Revenue Three Months Ended

December 31,


    

Total Revenue

Three Months Ended

December 31,


 
    

2002


      

2001


    

2002


    

2001


    

2002


    

2001


 

North America

  

69.2

%

    

61.7

%

  

79.8

%

  

79.0

%

  

76.9

%

  

72.9

%

EMEA

  

18.9

%

    

29.7

%

  

14.9

%

  

15.6

%

  

16.0

%

  

20.5

%

LAAP

  

11.9

%

    

8.6

%

  

5.3

%

  

5.4

%

  

7.1

%

  

6.6

%

    

    

  

  

  

  

Total

  

100.0

%

    

100.0

%

  

100.0

%

  

100.0

%

  

100.0

%

  

100.0

%

    

    

  

  

  

  

 

Additional information about our operations in these geographic areas is presented in note (9) of the notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements in this report.

 

Cost of License Revenue. Cost of license revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2002 was $3.6 million compared to $4.0 million for the three months ended December 31, 2001. The decrease of $375,000 or 9% was due to lower product royalty expense as a result of lower license revenue recognized in the period offset partially by higher amortization of capitalized software. We expect cost of license revenue to vary from period to period based on the mix of products licensed between internally developed products and royalty bearing products and the timing of computer software amortization costs.

 

Cost of Services Revenue. Cost of services revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2002 was $8.1 million compared to $8.6 million for the three months ended December 31, 2001, a decrease of $560,000 or 6%. Cost of services revenue as a percentage of services revenue also decreased to 35.7% during the three months ended December 31, 2002 as compared to 39.9% in the year earlier period. Cost of services revenue decreased as a result of lower direct expenses, particularly for sub-contractor fees and personnel related expenses for professional services due to lower professional services revenues.

 

Selling and Marketing Expenses. Selling and marketing expenses for three months ended December 31, 2002 were $10.5 million compared to $8.3 million in the year earlier quarter, an increase of $2.1 million or 26%. Selling and marketing expense also increased as a percentage of total revenue to 33.7% for the three months ended December 31, 2002 from 25.0% in the year earlier quarter. The increase in selling and marketing expense as well as the increase as a percentage of total revenue was primarily due to two factors: (1) the change in product mix of our license revenue recognized between time-based license revenue and perpetual license revenue, and (2) higher amounts of license revenue recognized for which we owed commissions to our affiliates. We believe that affiliate commissions will fluctuate from period to period based on our product mix and the levels of sales by our affiliates and by our direct sales organization. Additionally, expenses for marketing activities, particularly in marketing program spend and personnel related costs, were higher during the three months ended December 31, 2002 as compared to the year earlier quarter.

 

16


Table of Contents

 

Product Development Expenses. The following table shows information about our product development expenses during the three months ended December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001:

 

    

Three Months Ended

December 31,


          
    

2002


    

2001


      

Change From

Prior Year


 
    

(Dollars in thousands)

          

Product development costs

  

$

4,023

 

  

$

5,125

 

    

(21.5

)%

Software translation costs

  

 

358

 

  

 

374

 

    

(4.3

)

    


  


        

Total product development activities

  

 

4,381

 

  

 

5,499

 

    

(20.3

)

    


  


        

Less:

                          

Capitalized product development costs

  

 

(750

)

  

 

(528

)

    

42.0

 

Capitalized software translation costs

  

 

(55

)

  

 

(96

)

    

(42.7

)

    


  


        
    

 

(805

)

  

 

(624

)

    

29.0

 

    


  


        

Product development expenses

  

$

3,576

 

  

$

4,875

 

    

(26.6

)%

    


  


        

As a percentage of total revenue

  

 

11.5

%

  

 

14.6

%

        

 

Spending on product development activities decreased 20% during the three months ended December 31, 2002 compared to the same period in the prior year. Spending activities decreased for both product development and software translation activities. Our offshore information technology services partnership and associated restructuring of operations in fiscal 2002 resulted in reduced product development costs during the three months ended December 31, 2002 compared to the year earlier quarter and will likely reduce the amounts of software development costs capitalized and subsequently amortized. Software translation costs are typically project related, and the timing of those expenditures is subject to change from period to period.

 

Software capitalization rates generally are affected by the nature and timing of development activities and vary from period to period. For the three months ended December 31, 2002, capitalization of product development and translation costs increased 29% from the three months ended December 31, 2001.

 

General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses were $3.1 million for the three months period ended December 31, 2002 compared to $4.1 million in the year earlier quarter. The $977,000 or 24% decrease was primarily due to decreases in foreign exchange losses primarily in our EMEA region and bad debt expense.

 

Interest Income and Interest Expense. Interest income was $76,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2002 compared to $138,000 in the previous year period. The decrease of $62,000 or 45% resulted primarily from a decrease in interest rates, partially offset by a higher balance of cash for the three months ended December 31, 2002.

 

For the three months ended December 31, 2002, interest expense principally included commitment fees on the unused portion of our revolving credit facility and amortization of debt issuance costs. For the three months ended December 31, 2001, interest expense principally included (1) interest on our term loan based on our lender’s base rate or LIBOR plus a predetermined margin, (2) the difference between interest paid and interest received under our interest rate protection arrangement, (3) commitment fees on the unused portion of our revolving credit facility, and (4) amortization of debt issuance costs. For the three months ended December 31, 2002, interest expense was $46,000 compared to $505,000 in the year earlier quarter. We repaid the remaining portion of our bank credit facility during fiscal 2002, and as a result, interest expense decreased 91% from the previous period. Taking into effect the interest rate protection arrangement and excluding the amortization of debt issue costs, the effective annual interest rate on our term loan for the three months ended December 31, 2001 was 7.5%. The term of our interest rate protection arrangement ended on December 31, 2001. As mentioned previously, we expect to complete the acquisition of Frontstep during the second quarter of fiscal 2003 as well as to close on a $30 million syndicated credit facility. As a result of these transactions, we expect interest expense to increase in future periods.

 

17


Table of Contents

 

Income Tax Expense (Benefit). The effective income tax rates for the three months ended December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001 were 37.0% and 38.5%, respectively. The effective income tax rate for the two periods differs from the federal statutory rate of 35.0% because of the effect of state and foreign income taxes.

 

We retained certain favorable income tax attributes in connection with the separation of Marcam Corporation into two companies in 1997. We have realized certain of these attributes in subsequent periods, which were recorded as income tax benefits at that time. Additional future income tax benefits related to these remaining attributes may be realized in future periods if and when they become certain.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Historically, we have funded our operations and capital expenditures primarily with cash generated from operating activities. Changes in net cash provided by operating activities generally reflect the changes in earnings plus the effect of changes in working capital. Changes in working capital, especially trade accounts receivable, trade accounts payable and accrued expenses, are generally the result of timing differences between collection of fees billed and payment of operating expenses.

 

The following tables show information about our cash flows during the three months ended December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001 and selected balance sheet data as of December 31, 2002 and September 30, 2002.

 

 

    

Summary of Cash Flows


 
    

Three Months Ended

December 31,


 
    

2002


    

2001


 
    

(in thousands)

 

Net cash provided by operating activities before changes in operating assets and liabilities

  

$

4,139

 

  

$

6,318

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities

  

 

(1,588

)

  

 

501

 

    


  


Net cash provided by operating activities

  

 

2,551

 

  

 

6,819

 

Net cash used for investing activities

  

 

(1,787

)

  

 

(888

)

Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities

  

 

203

 

  

 

(4,556

)

    


  


Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

  

$

967

 

  

$

1,375

 

    


  


 

    

Balance Sheet Data


 
    

December 31,

2002


    

September 30,

2002


 
    

(In thousands)

 

Cash and cash equivalents

  

$

24,628

 

  

$

23,661

 

Working capital (deficit)

  

 

(15,185

)

  

 

(17,368

)

 

Operating Activities

 

We generated $4.1 million in cash flows from operating activities before changes in operating assets and liabilities during the three months ended December 31, 2002 compared to $6.3 million in cash flows from operating activities before changes in operating assets and liabilities during the three months ended December 31, 2001. The $2.2 million decrease from the year earlier quarter included a $1.1 million decrease in deferred income taxes, a $443,000 decrease in net income and a $406,000 reduction in the provision for bad debts.

 

Significant changes in operating assets and liabilities during the three months ended December 31, 2002 included (1) a $3.3 million decrease in accounts receivable attributable to lower licensing activity during the quarter and an increase in cash collections, days sales outstanding decreased to 65 days at December 31, 2002 from 77 days at September 30, 2002, (2) a $3.3 million net decrease in deferred revenue and deferred costs; and (3) a $1.5 million decrease in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities resulting primarily from the timing of cash payments.

 

18


Table of Contents

 

Investing and Financing Activities

 

For the three months ended December 31, 2002 compared to the same quarter in the prior year, we increased spending for property and equipment by $114,000, and we increased spending for additions to computer software by $181,000. Additionally, for the three months ended December 31, 2002, we incurred transaction costs of $653,000 related to the pending business combination with Frontstep.

 

The significant difference in the nature and amounts of net cash flows from financing activities during the three months ended December 31, 2002 compared to the three months ended December 31, 2001 relates to the principal repayments of long-term debt. We repaid our long-term debt during fiscal 2002, and there was no balance outstanding as of December 31, 2002. During the three months ended December 31, 2001, we repaid $4.7 million of our term loan. As of December 31, 2001 the term loan had an outstanding balance of $14.0 million.

 

On April 26, 2002, we entered into a new secured revolving credit facility which provides for a revolving credit line of up to $10.0 million. There was no balance outstanding as of December 31, 2002. We intend to replace this facility with a new $30.0 million credit facility that we expect to close on February 18, 2003, the proceeds of which will be used in connection with the closing of the Frontstep acquisition.

 

Our current revolving credit facility matures on April 24, 2003 and may be extended for an additional 364-day term at our request and at the discretion of the bank. We may make voluntary prepayments of the revolving loans without premium or penalty, and all outstanding unpaid principal on the revolving loans will mature on April 24, 2003 but may be extended if the credit facility is extended. At our option, the interest rates for the revolving credit facility are either adjusted LIBOR plus 2.50% per year, or the base rate plus 1.00% per year. The base rate is the higher of the defined prime rate or the federal funds rate plus one-half of one percent. Substantially all of our domestic assets are pledged as collateral for any obligations under the new revolving credit facility. Additionally, all of our domestic subsidiaries have guaranteed the repayment of our obligations under the revolving credit facility.

 

The revolving credit facility contains covenants which, among other things, require us to maintain specific financial ratios and impose limitations or prohibitions on us with respect to:

 

    incurrence of additional indebtedness outside the facility, liens and capital leases;

 

    the payment of dividends on and the redemption or repurchase of our capital stock;

 

    acquisitions and investments;

 

    mergers and consolidations; and

 

    the disposition of any of our properties or assets outside the ordinary course of business.

 

At December 31, 2002, we had federal net operating loss carryforwards of $6.8 million and research and experimentation and other credit carryforwards of $4.4 million. The net operating losses and tax credits at December 31, 2002 expire between fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2020. The utilization of a significant portion of the net operating losses and tax credits is limited on an annual basis due to various changes in ownership of both MAPICS and Pivotpoint, a company we acquired on January 12, 2000. We do not believe that these limitations will significantly impact our ability to utilize the net operating losses and tax credits before they expire. We also retain additional favorable income tax attributes in connection with the 1997 separation of Marcam Corporation into two companies, and additional future income tax benefits related to these tax attributes may be realized in future periods if and when they become certain. We believe they will continue to result in cash savings in future periods as we use them to offset income taxes payable. We have recorded the net deferred tax assets at the amount we believe is more likely than not to be realized.

 

On July 31, 2002, we announced that our board of directors approved a plan to repurchase up to 10.0 million shares of our outstanding common stock in light of our stock price and liquidity position. Purchases are expected to be made from time to time, depending on market conditions, in private transactions as well as in the open market at prevailing market prices. During the three months ended December 31, 2002, we repurchased 1,600 shares of stock for approximately $9,000. These shares are available for reissuance for general corporate purposes.

 

On January 15, 2002, we announced a five-year agreement with an offshore information technology services company to perform a variety of our ongoing product development activities. The agreement was a contributing

 

19


Table of Contents

 

factor in a planned reduction of our worldwide workforce by approximately 12% by June 30, 2002. The restructuring charge of $4.7 million during fiscal 2002 included $3.7 million related to the abandonment of excess office space and $1.0 million related to employee severance and related costs for approximately 65 employees, primarily product development and support personnel.

 

The major components of the remaining restructuring accrual at December 31, 2002 were as follows (in thousands):

 

      

Accrued

Restructuring Costs at

September 30, 2002


  

Amounts

Utilized


      

Accrued

Restructuring Costs at
December 31, 2002


Cost of abandonment of excess space and other

    

$

3,573

  

$

(147

)

    

$

3,426

Employee severance and related costs

    

 

25

  

 

(25

)

    

 

—  

      

  


    

      

$

3,598

  

$

(172

)

    

$

3,426

      

  


    

 

We expect future cash expenditures related to these restructuring activities to be approximately $3.4 million. We expect to pay approximately $1.2 million within the twelve-month period ending December 31, 2003, and we therefore have included this amount in current liabilities.

 

As shown in the table above, our restructuring liability is principally comprised of the estimated excess lease and related costs associated with vacated office space. We could incur additional restructuring charges or reverse prior charges accordingly in the event that the underlying assumptions used to develop our estimates of excess lease costs change, such as the timing and the amount of any sublease income. Additionally, as discussed previously, we have a pending business combination with Frontstep that we expect to close on February 18, 2003. Depending on the impact of our acquisition of Frontstep, market conditions for office space and our ability to secure a suitable subtenant and sublease for the space, which to date we have not secured, we may revise our estimates of the excess lease costs and the timing and amount of sublease income and, as a result, incur additional charges or credits to our restructuring liability as appropriate.

 

Pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreement between us and Frontstep, terms of the acquisition include our purchase of all of Frontstep’s shares in exchange for 4.2 million shares of MAPICS common stock and the assumption by us of up to $21.5 million of Frontstep’s debt as well as certain outstanding stock options and warrants. As of September 30, 2002, the face value of Frontstep’s outstanding debt and notes payable was $21.4 million, excluding $1.8 million of unamortized debt discount.

 

We have signed a commitment letter for a $30.0 million syndicated credit facility, the proceeds of which will be used to repay the debt amounts assumed from Frontstep. We anticipate closing on this new credit facility by February 18, 2003 and repaying all the debt outstanding from Frontstep immediately after the close of the acquisition. The interest rates on the new debt financing will be lower than the existing rates of the Frontstep debt.

 

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements or financing arrangements with related parties, persons who were previously related parties, or any other parties who might be in a position to negotiate arrangements with us other than on an arms-length basis.

 

 

20


Table of Contents

 

We do not have any current plans or commitments for any significant capital expenditures.

 

We believe that cash and cash equivalents on hand as of December 31, 2002, together with cash flows from operations and available borrowings anticipated under the syndicated credit facility for which we have a commitment letter, will be sufficient to fund our operations, including our acquisition of Frontstep, for at least the next 12 months.

 

Contractual Obligations and Contingent Liabilities and Commitments

 

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2002 by the periods in which the related payments by us become due.

 

         

Payments Due by Period


Contractual Obligations


  

Total


  

Less than

1 Year


  

1-3 Years


  

4-5 Years


  

More than
5 Years


Operating leases

  

$

13,225

  

$

3,274

  

$

7,885

  

$

2,067

  

$

  —  

    

  

  

  

  

 

We had no contingent liabilities or commitments at December 31, 2002 except for the following:

 

    in March 2000, we acquired an education business. In exchange for the business, we issued 106,668 shares of restricted common stock. If, on March 1, 2003, the price per share of our common stock is less than $18.75, we must pay additional consideration equal to the difference between $18.75 and the quoted market price multiplied by the number of shares of common stock issued at acquisition that the sellers still hold on March 1, 2003. If the closing market price on March 1, 2003 is $7.00 per share, the value of the additional consideration would be approximately $1.3 million. As the stock price at March 1, 2003 is not known, this estimate is subject to change. We may elect to pay all or a portion of this additional consideration with shares of common stock and any remainder in cash. The effect of this additional consideration will be to increase our goodwill. We will review this additional goodwill for impairment, and we anticipate that this review will indicate that the goodwill is impaired, which will result in a charge to expense for the three months ended March 31, 2003; and

 

    we are a party to change of control employment agreements and term employment agreements with certain of our executive officers. See “Item 11. Executive Compensation” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002.

 

As discussed above, we have a $10.0 million revolving credit facility. The facility matures on April 24, 2003 and may be extended for an additional 364-day term. There was no balance outstanding as of December 31, 2002.

 

Application of Critical Accounting Policies

 

In applying the accounting policies that we use to prepare our consolidated financial statements, we necessarily make accounting estimates that affect our reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Some of these accounting estimates require us to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time we make the accounting estimates. We base these assumptions and the resulting estimates on historical information and other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, and we evaluate these assumptions and estimates on an ongoing basis. However, in many instances we reasonably could have used different accounting estimates, and in other instances changes in our accounting estimates are reasonably likely to occur from period to period, with the result in each case being a material change in the financial statement presentation of our financial condition or results of operations. We refer to accounting estimates of this type as “critical accounting estimates.” Among those critical accounting estimates that we believe are most important to an understanding of our consolidated financial statements are those that we discuss below.

 

Accounting estimates necessarily require subjective determinations about future events and conditions. Therefore, the following descriptions of critical accounting estimates are forward-looking statements, and actual results could differ materially from the results anticipated by these forward-looking statements. You should read the following descriptions of our critical accounting estimates in conjunction with note 2 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements contained in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” and “Item 7.

 

21


Table of Contents

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Factors Affecting Future Performance” in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002.

 

Revenue Recognition. We generate revenues primarily by licensing software, providing software support and maintenance and providing professional services to our customers. We record all revenues in accordance with the guidance provided by SOP 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition,” SOP 98-9, “Modification of SOP 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition, with Respect to Certain Transactions,” SOP 81-1, “Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Product-Type Contracts,” and AICPA TPA 5100.53 “Fair Value of PCS in a Short-Term Time-Based License and Software Revenue Recognition.”

 

We generate a significant portion of our total revenue from licensing software. In determining when to recognize licensing revenue, we make assumptions and estimates about the probability of collection of the related receivable. Additionally, we specifically evaluate any other elements in our license transactions, including but not limited to options to purchase additional software or users at a future date, extended payment terms, functionality commitments not delivered with the software and existing outstanding accounts receivable balances in making the determination of the amount and timing of revenue recognition. If changes occur in our assumptions, operating results for any reporting period could be adversely affected.

 

The license agreements for our software products include a limited express warranty. The warranty provides that the product, in its unaltered form, will perform substantially in accordance with our related documentation for period of up to 90 days from delivery. If the product does not perform substantially in accordance with the documentation, we may repair or replace the product or terminate the license and refund the license fees paid for the product. All other warranties are expressly disclaimed. In addition to this warranty and in return for the payment of annual license or support fees, we also provide customers with available annual maintenance services that include electronic usage support and defect repairs. To the extent that product defects arise, most are identified long after the product has been installed and used and after the warranty period has expired. In most instances, a product workaround and repair can be made and such repairs are delivered as part of maintenance services. Historically, we have not received any material warranty claims related to our products, and we have no reason to believe that we will receive any material claims in the future.

 

We also provide professional consulting and implementation services to our customers; however, the professional services that we provide are not essential to the functionality of our delivered products. We provide our professional services under services agreements, and the revenues from our professional consulting and implementation services are generally time and material based and are recognized as the work is performed, provided that the customer has a contractual obligation to pay, the fee is non-refundable, and collection is probable. Delays in project implementation will result in delays in revenue recognition. On some occasions our professional consulting services involve fixed-price and/or fixed-time arrangements, and we recognize the related revenues using contract accounting, which requires the accurate estimation of cost, scope and duration of each engagement. We recognize revenue and the related costs for these projects on the percentage-of-completion method, with progress-to-completion measured by using labor costs input and with revisions to estimates reflected in the period in which changes become known. Project losses are provided for in their entirety in the period they become known, without regard to the percentage-of-completion. If we do not accurately estimate the resources required or the scope of work to be performed, or if we do not manage our projects properly within the planned periods of time, then future consulting margins on our projects may be negatively affected or losses on existing contracts may need to be recognized.

 

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. Accounts receivable comprise trade receivables that are credit based and do not require collateral. We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate the collectibility of accounts receivable based upon historical collections and assessment of the collectibility of specific accounts. The majority of our receivables are with companies within North America. Our receivables in North America comprised 74.3% of consolidated net accounts receivable as of December 31, 2002. We specifically review the collectibility of accounts in North America with outstanding accounts receivable balances over $15,000. Outside North America, we specifically review the collectibility of all accounts with outstanding balances. We evaluate the collectibility of specific accounts using a combination of factors, including the age of the outstanding balance(s), evaluation of the account’s financial condition and credit scores, recent payment history, and discussions with our account executive for the specific customer and with the customer directly. Based upon this evaluation of the collectibility of accounts receivable, an increase or decrease required in the allowance for doubtful accounts is

 

22


Table of Contents

 

reflected in the period in which the evaluation indicates that a change is necessary. If actual results differ, this could have an impact on our financial condition, results of operation and cash flows.

 

Deferred Income Taxes. Deferred tax assets primarily include temporary differences related to deferred revenue and net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. These carryforwards may be used to offset future taxable income through fiscal 2020, subject to certain limitations. We estimate the likelihood of future taxable income from operations and the reversal of deferred tax liabilities in assessing the need for any valuation allowance to offset our deferred tax assets. In the event that we believe that a valuation allowance is necessary, the corresponding reduction to the deferred tax asset would result in a charge to income in the period that the establishment of the valuation allowance is made. We evaluate the realizability of the deferred tax assets and the need for valuation allowances on a regular basis.

 

We also record a payable for certain federal, state, and international tax liabilities based on the likelihood of an obligation, when needed. In the normal course of business, we are subject to challenges from U.S. and non-U.S. tax authorities regarding the amount of taxes due. These challenges, or the resolution of any income tax uncertainties, may result in adjustments to the timing or amount of taxable income or deductions or the allocation of income among tax jurisdictions. In the event that actual results differ from these estimates, or if income tax uncertainties are resolved, we may need to adjust our income tax provisions, which could materially impact our financial condition and results of operations.

 

Computer Software Costs. We charge all computer software development costs prior to establishing technological feasibility of computer software products to product development expense as they are incurred. Following the guidance of SFAS No. 86, “Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased or Otherwise Marketed”, from the time of establishing technological feasibility through general release of the product, we capitalize computer software development and translation costs and report them on the balance sheet as computer software costs. We begin amortizing computer software costs upon general release of the product to customers and compute amortization on a product-by-product basis. We regularly review software for technological obsolescence and determine the amortization period based on the estimated useful life. As a part of our review, we consider such factors as cash flows from existing customers, future sales of products, new product release plans and future development. As a result, future amortization periods for computer software costs could be shortened to reflect changes in the estimated useful life in the future based on the factors described above. Any resulting acceleration in amortization could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. On October 1, 2001, we adopted SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” Upon adoption, we ceased amortization of goodwill. We performed a required transitional impairment test, and based on the results of the test, we recorded no impairment to goodwill. We have continued to amortize all of our intangible assets over the life of the asset. Our goodwill balances will be subject to annual impairment tests, which require us to estimate the fair value of our business compared to the carrying value. Annual tests or other future events could cause us to conclude that impairment indicators exist and that our goodwill is impaired. Any resulting impairment loss could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

Restructuring. Our restructuring liability is principally comprised of the estimated excess lease and related costs associated with vacated office space. We could incur additional restructuring charges or reverse prior charges accordingly in the event that the underlying assumptions used to develop our estimates of excess lease costs change, such as the timing and the amount of any sublease income. For example, our current estimates assume that our excess lease space will be vacant for a period of twelve months beginning in April 2002. Depending on the impact of our acquisition of Frontstep, market conditions for office space and our ability to secure a suitable subtenant and sublease for the space, which to date we have not secured, we may revise our estimates of the excess lease costs and the timing and the amount of sublease income and, as a result, incur additional charges or credits to our restructuring liability as appropriate. If our excess lease space were to remain vacant for an additional six-months, an additional restructuring charge of approximately $412,000 could be required. If the prevailing market sublease rates were to increase by 10% over our current estimate of sublease rental rates, a credit of approximately $400,000 could also be required. Additionally, if we were to reoccupy 25% of the space as a result of the Frontstep acquisition, a credit of approximately $800,000 could be required.

 

23


Table of Contents

 

Recently Issued or Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

 

In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.” This statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies EITF Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring).” SFAS No. 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized and measured initially at fair value only when the liability is incurred. SFAS No. 146 is effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002, with early application encouraged. We will apply SFAS No. 146 to any exit or disposal activities that we may enter into in future periods.

 

In November 2002, the FASB reached a consensus on EITF Issue 00-21, “Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables” (the Issue). The guidance in this Issue is effective for revenue arrangements entered into in fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2003. The Issue addresses certain aspects of the accounting by a vendor for arrangements under which it will perform multiple revenue-generating activities. Specifically, the Issue addresses how to determine whether an arrangement involving multiple deliverables contains more than one earnings process and, if it does, how to divide the arrangement into separate units of accounting consistent with the identified earning processes for revenue recognition purposes. The Issue also addresses how arrangement consideration should be measured and allocated to the separate units of accounting in the arrangement. We currently follow the appropriate pronouncement as discussed in note 2 and anticipate the Issue to have no significant impact on the results of our operations, financial position, or cash flows.

 

In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others.” This Interpretation clarifies the requirements of SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies,” relating to guarantor’s accounting for, and disclosure of, the issuance of certain types of guarantees. This Interpretation is intended to improve the comparability of financial reporting by requiring identical accounting for guarantees issued with a separately identified premium and guarantees issued without a separately identified premium. The Interpretation’s provisions fo initial recognition and measurement are required on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The disclosure requirements are effective for financial statements of both interim and annual periods that ended after December 15, 2002. We have provided the required disclosures related to our policy on product warranties and contingent consideration arising from acquisitions in notes (2) and (8) of this Form 10-Q. The inclusion of the required disclosures had no significant impact on the results of our operations, financial position, or cash flows.

 

In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure-an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123.” This Statement amends FASB Statement No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, the Statement amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. The amendments pertaining to the alternative methods of transition are effective for financial statements for fiscal years ended after December 15, 2002. The amendments to the disclosure requirements are effective for financial reports containing condensed financial statements for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2002, with early application encouraged. We apply APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and related interpretations in accounting for our stock option plans and our employee stock purchase plan and the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS No. 123. We plan to adopt the amended interim disclosure requirements during the quarter ending March 31, 2003. We anticipate that the adoption of the additional disclosure requirement will not have a significant impact on the results of our operations, financial position or cash flows.

 

In January 2003, the FASB issued FIN 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.” This interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements,” addresses consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities which possess certain characteristics. The Interpretation requires that if a business enterprise has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity, the assets, liabilities, and results of the activities of the variable interest entity must be included in the consolidated financial statements with those of the business enterprise. This Interpretation applies immediately to variable interest entities created after January 31,

 

24


Table of Contents

2003 and to variable interest entities in which an enterprise obtains an interest after that date. We do not have any ownership in any variable interest entities as of December 31, 2003. We will apply the consolidation requirement of FIN 46 in future periods if we should own any interest in any variable interest entity.

 

ITEM 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

Except as discussed in the following paragraphs, we do not engage in trading market risk sensitive instruments nor do we purchase, whether for investment, hedging or purposes “other than trading,” instruments that are likely to expose us to market risk, whether foreign currency exchange rate, interest rate, commodity price or equity price risk. We have not issued any debt instruments, entered into any forward or futures contracts, purchased any options or entered into any swaps, except as discussed in the following paragraphs.

 

Interest Rate Sensitivity

 

As of December 31, 2002, we had no outstanding balance under our revolving credit facility. However, we have signed a commitment letter for a $30.0 million syndicated credit facility, the proceeds of which will be used to repay the outstanding debt assumed from Frontstep. We anticipate closing on that facility on February 18, 2003. We anticipate that the new credit facility will have interest payments based on variable interest rates such as LIBOR. We will be subject to the risks of fluctuations in the variable interest rates in future periods.

 

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Sensitivity

 

Some of our operations generate cash denominated in foreign currency. Consequently, we are exposed to certain foreign currency exchange rate risks. As a result, our financial results could be affected by factors such as changes in foreign currency exchange rates or weak economic conditions in the foreign markets in which we distribute products. When the U.S. dollar strengthens against a foreign currency, the value of our sales in that currency converted to U.S. dollars decreases. When the U.S. dollar weakens, the value of our sales in that currency converted to U.S. dollars increases.

 

From time to time, we may enter into forward exchange contracts or purchase options to minimize the effect of changes in exchange rates on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. We incurred net foreign currency transaction gains of $151,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2002 and net foreign currency losses of $137,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2001, mostly due to transactions within EMEA. We did not have any open forward exchange contracts or options or other trading financial instruments with foreign exchange risk at December 31, 2002 or December 31, 2001. At December 31, 2002, we had the following non-trading other financial instruments denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar (in thousands of U.S. dollars):

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

  

$

1,453

Trade accounts receivable (a)

  

$

7,136

Trade accounts payable

  

$

679

 


(a)   Approximately $5.8 million of this amount is denominated in euros, pounds sterling or yen, all of which have stable historical exchange rates with the U.S. dollar.

 

As our foreign operations increase, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected by future changes in foreign currency exchange rates. For further information see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Factors Affecting Future Performance—Our international operations subject us to a number of risks that could substantially hinder our future growth and current results” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002.

 

Inflation

 

Although we cannot accurately determine the amounts attributable thereto, we have been affected by inflation, through increased costs of employee compensation and other operation expenses. To the extent permitted by the

 

25


Table of Contents

marketplace for our products and services, we attempt to recover increases in costs by periodically increasing prices. Additionally, most of our license agreements and services agreements provide for annual increases in charges.

 

ITEM 4: Controls and Procedures

 

  (a)   Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Within 90 days prior to the filing date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Evaluation Date”), we evaluated, under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.

 

  (b)   Changes in Internal Controls. Subsequent to the Evaluation Date, there were no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect our internal controls, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

PART II: OTHER INFORMATION

 

ITEM 5: Other Information

 

Quarterly Stock Options Disclosures

 

At December 31, 2002, we had stock options or shares of common stock outstanding under five stock option plans and an employee stock purchase plan, described below.

 

The 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The MAPICS, Inc. 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan, or 1998 LTIP, allows us to issue up to 4,500,000 shares of common stock through various stock-based awards to our directors, officers, employees and consultants including an additional 1,000,000 shares authorized in fiscal 2002. The stock-based awards can be in the form of (a) incentive stock options, or ISOs, or non-qualified stock options; (b) stock appreciation rights; (c) performance units; (d) restricted stock; (e) dividend equivalents; and (f) other stock based awards. In general, the exercise price specified in the agreement relating to each ISO granted under the 1998 LTIP is required to be not less than the fair market value of the common stock as of the date of grant.

 

Restricted stock are shares of common stock that we granted outright without cost to the employee. The shares, however, are restricted in that they may not be sold or otherwise transferred by the employee until they vest, generally after the end of three years. If the employee is terminated prior to the vesting date for any reason other than death or retirement, the restricted stock generally will be forfeited and the restricted stock will be returned to us. After the shares have vested, they become unrestricted and may be transferred and sold like any other shares of common stock.

 

We recognize compensation expense over the vesting period based on the fair value on the grant date. Unearned restricted stock compensation, which represents compensation expense attributable to future periods, is presented as a separate component of shareholders’ equity.

 

The Directors Plan. The MAPICS, Inc. 1998 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan allows us to issue non-qualified stock options to purchase up to 460,000 shares of common stock to eligible members of the board of directors who are neither our employees nor our officers. In general, the exercise price specified in the agreement relating to each non-qualified stock option granted under the Directors Plan is required to be the fair market value of the common stock at the date of grant. Subject to specific provisions, stock options granted under the Directors Plan become exercisable in various increments over a period of one to four years, provided that the optionee has continuously served as a member of the board of directors through the vesting date. The stock options granted under the Directors Plan expire ten years from the date of grant.

 

The Directors Incentive Plan. The 1998 Non-Employee Directors Stock Incentive Plan provides for the issuance of common stock, deferred rights to receive common stock and non-qualified stock options to purchase up to 160,000 shares of common stock to eligible members of the board of directors who are neither our employees nor our officers, including an additional 100,000 shares authorized in fiscal 2002.

 

26


Table of Contents

 

The 1987 Plan. Prior to its expiration on December 31, 1996, the Marcam Corporation 1987 Stock Plan allowed us to grant ISOs to our employees and non-qualified stock options and stock awards to our officers, employees and consultants. In general, the exercise price specified in the agreement relating to each ISO granted under the 1987 Plan was required to be not less than the fair market value of the common stock as of the date of grant. Subject to specific provisions, stock options granted under the 1987 Plan were fully exercisable on the date of grant or became exercisable thereafter in installments specified by the board of directors. The stock options granted under the 1987 Plan expire on dates specified by the board of directors not to exceed a period of ten years from the date of grant.

 

The 1994 Plan. Prior to its discontinuation in February 1998, the Marcam Corporation 1994 Stock Plan allowed us to grant ISOs to our employees and non-qualified stock options and stock awards to our officers, employees and consultants. In general, the exercise price specified in the agreement relating to each ISO granted under the 1994 Plan was required to be not less than the fair market value of the common stock as of the date of grant. The 1994 Plan required non-qualified stock options to be granted with an exercise price that was not less than the minimum legal consideration required under applicable state law. Subject to specific provisions, stock options granted under the 1994 Plan were fully exercisable on the date of grant or became exercisable after the date of grant in installments specified by the board of directors. The stock options granted under the 1994 Plan expire on dates specified by the board of directors not to exceed a period of ten years from the date of grant.

 

The 2000 ESPP. The MAPICS, Inc. 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or 2000 ESPP, was approved during fiscal 2000 and provides that we are authorized to issue up to 500,000 shares of common stock to our full-time employees, nearly all of whom are eligible to participate. The 2000 ESPP is a qualified plan under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code. Under the terms of the 2000 ESPP, employees, excluding those owning 5% or more of the common stock, can choose every six months to have up to 10% of their base and bonus earnings withheld to purchase common stock, subject to limitations. The purchase price of the common stock is 85% of the lower of its beginning-of-period or end-of-period market price. The 2000 ESPP expires on December 31, 2007.

 

Except for the look-back options issued under the 2000 ESPP, all stock options granted under our stock-based compensation plans, as well as those stock options granted outside our stock-based compensation plans, were granted at exercise prices not less than the fair market value of the common stock at the date of grant.

 

Option Grants

 

Option Grants As of End of Current Interim Reporting Period

 

    

Fiscal 2001


    

Fiscal 2002


    

YTD 2003


 

Net grants during the period as a % of outstanding shares

  

4.4

%

  

5.1

%

  

0.8

%

Grants to named executive officers (1) during the period as a % of total options granted

  

50.3

%

  

23.8

%

  

35.9

%

Grants to named executive officers during the period as a % of outstanding shares

  

2.2

%

  

1.2

%

  

0.3

%

Cumulative options held by named executive officers as a % of total options outstanding

  

22.8

%

  

24.6

%

  

24.9

%

 


(1) As defined in “Item 11. Executive Compensation” of our Form 10-K for fiscal 2002.

 

27


Table of Contents

 

Summary of Option Activity

As of December 31, 2002

 

The following table reflects the activity and historical weighted average exercise prices of our stock options for the indicated periods from September 30, 2001 through December 31, 2002.

 

      

Number of Shares

Under Options


      

Weighted Average Exercise Price($)


Balance as of September 30, 2001

    

4,695,162

 

    

9.78

Granted

    

976,547

 

    

7.32

Exercised

    

(42,750

)

    

4.05

Canceled/expired

    

(358,843

)

    

11.46

      

    

Balance as of September 30, 2002

    

5,270,116

 

    

9.25

      

    

Granted

    

255,011

 

    

7.13

Exercised

    

(3,500

)

    

4.74

Canceled/expired

    

(94,769

)

    

12.61

      

    

Balance as of December 31, 2002

    

5,426,858

 

    

9.09

      

    

 

In-the-Money and Out-of-the-Money Option Information

 

    

As of December 31, 2002


    

Exercisable


  

Unexercisable


  

Total


    

Shares


    

Weighted Average Exercise Price


  

Shares


    

Weighted Average Exercise Price


  

Shares


    

Weighted Average Exercise Price


In-the-Money

  

529,229

    

$

4.72

  

898,600

    

$

5.01

  

1,427,829

    

$

4.90

Out-of-the-Money(1)

  

2,404,818

    

 

11.59

  

1,594,211

    

 

9.13

  

3,999,029

    

 

10.61

Total Options Outstanding

  

2,934,047

    

 

10.35

  

2,492,811

    

 

7.65

  

5,426,858

    

 

9.11

 


(1)   Out-of-the-Money options are those options with an exercise price equal or above the closing price of $6.95 at December 31, 2002.

 

The following table provides information with regard to stock option grants during fiscal 2003 to the named executive officers pursuant to our 1998 LTIP during the first quarter of fiscal 2003. All options identified become exercisable at the rate of 50% per year beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date. All options expire ten years from the date of grant.

 

Option Grants

During the Fiscal Quarter Ended December 31, 2002

 

Name


  

Number of Securities Underlying Options

Granted(#)


    

Percent of Total Options Granted to Employees In Fiscal Year


    

Exercise or Base Price

($/Sh)


  

Expiration

Date


  

Potential Realizable Value

at Assumed Annual Rates

of Stock Price Appreciation

for Option Term


                

5%($)


  

10%($)


Richard C. Cook

  

15,000

    

9.80

%

  

$

7.15

  

12/08/12

  

$

67,449

  

$

170,929

Peter E. Reilly

  

15,000

    

9.80

 

  

 

7.15

  

12/08/12

  

 

67,449

  

 

170,929

Michael J. Casey

  

15,000

    

9.80

 

  

 

7.15

  

12/08/12

  

 

67,449

  

 

170,929

Martin D. Avallone

  

10,000

    

6.54

 

  

 

7.15

  

12/08/12

  

 

44,966

  

 

113,953

 

        Amounts reported in the last two columns represent hypothetical amounts that may be realized upon exercise of the options immediately prior to the expiration of their term, assuming the specified compounded rates of appreciation of the common stock over the term of the options. The numbers shown in these two columns are calculated based on Securities and Exchange Commission rules and do not reflect our estimate of future stock price growth. Actual gains, if any, on stock option exercises and common stock holdings depend on the timing of such exercises and the future performance of the common stock. We do not guarantee that the rates of appreciation assumed in these two columns can be achieved or that the amounts reflected will be received by the named executive officers. The two columns do not take into account any appreciation of the price of the common stock from the date of grant to the current date.

 

28


Table of Contents

 

Option Exercises and Quarter - End Option Values

 

The following table sets forth information regarding:

 

    the number of shares of common stock received upon any exercise of options by the named executive officers during the three months ended December 31, 2002;

 

    the net value realized upon any exercise (the difference between the option exercise price and the sale price);

 

    the number of unexercised options held at December 31, 2002; and,

 

    the aggregate dollar value of unexercised options held at December 31, 2002.

 

Aggregated Option Exercises in the Fiscal Quarter and Fiscal Quarter Option Values

 

Name


    

Shares

Acquired on

Exercise(#)


    

Value

Realized($)


    

Number of Securities Underlying

Unexercised Options

at December 31, 2002(#)

Exercisable/Unexercisable


  

Value of Unexercised

In-The-Money Options at

December 31, 2002($)

Exercisable/Unexercisable


Richard C. Cook

    

—  

    

—  

    

408,725 / 224,375

  

$

366,419/ $232,706

Peter E. Reilly

    

—  

    

—  

    

116,250 / 168,750

  

 

270,694 / 259,581

Michael J. Casey

    

—  

    

—  

    

50,000 / 215,000

  

 

27,500 / 82,500

Martin D. Avallone

    

—  

    

—  

    

105,825 / 61,875

  

 

52,373 / 55,868

 

Equity Compensation Plan Information

 

The following table gives information about the common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options, warrants and rights under all of our existing equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2002.

 

    

(a)

Number of Securities to

be Issued Upon

Exercise of Outstanding

Options, Warrants

and Rights


    

(b)

Weighted Average

Exercise Price of

Outstanding Options,

Warrants and Rights


  

(c)

Number of Securities

Remaining Available for

Future Issuance

Under Equity Compensation

Plans (Excluding Securities

Reflected in Column (a))


 

Plan Category

                    

Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Shareholders

  

3,755,501

(1)

  

$

8.60

  

421,964

(2)

    

252,250

(3)

  

$

10.07

  

207,000

 

    

39,918

(4)

  

$

9.37

  

85,686

 

    

193,224

(5)

  

$

11.94

  

—  

 

    

1,172,270

(6)

  

$

9.79

  

—  

 

    

N/A

 

  

 

N/A

  

262,113

(7)

Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Shareholders

  

13,695

 

  

$

7.88

      
    

  

  

Total:

  

5,426,858

 

         

976,763

(2)

    

         

 


(1)   MAPICS, Inc. Amended and Restated 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
(2)   These numbers would be increased by 1,500,000 if the shareholders approve an amendment to the MAPICS, Inc. Amended and Restated 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan at the 2003 annual meeting of shareholders to held on February 18, 2003.
(3)   MAPICS, Inc. Amended and Restated 1998 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan.
(4)   MAPICS, Inc. Amended and Restated 1998 Non-Employee Directors Stock Incentive Plan. The amount shown includes 16,386 rights to deferred shares.
(5)   Marcam Corporation 1987 Stock Plan.
(6)   Marcam Corporation 1994 Stock Plan.
(7)   MAPICS, Inc. 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

 

29


Table of Contents

In connection with our acquisition of Bryce Business Systems, our Australian independent sales affiliate, we issued to the owners of Bryce options to acquire a total 24,060 shares of our common stock. The issuance of the options and related option shares was approved by our board of directors but was not required to be submitted to our shareholders for approval. Options for 10,365 of those shares were granted on October 1, 1992 at an exercise price of $15.39 per share and expired on September 30, 2002 unexercised. Options for the remaining 13,695 shares were granted on August 29, 1995 at an exercise price of $7.88 per share. These options are fully vested, and the underlying shares remain available for issuance if the options are exercised.

 

ITEM 6: Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

 

(a) Exhibits

 

None.

 

(b) Reports on Form 8-K

 

In a current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 25, 2002, we reported that we and Frontstep had entered into a definitive merger agreement pursuant to which MAPICS will acquire Frontstep.

 

30


Table of Contents

 

SIGNATURE

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

Date: February 10, 2003.

 

MAPICS, Inc.

By:

 

/s/ Michael J. Casey        


   

Michael J. Casey

Vice President of Finance, Chief

Financial Officer, and Treasurer (Duly

Authorized Officer and Principal

Financial and Accounting Officer)

 

31


Table of Contents

 

CERTIFICATION

OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Richard C. Cook, Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of MAPICS, Inc., certify that:

 

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MAPICS, Inc.;

 

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 

  a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

  b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days pr ior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

  c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

  a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

  b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

6.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

Date: February 10, 2003

 

 

/s/ RICHARD C. COOK


Richard C. Cook

President and

Chief Executive Officer

 

32


Table of Contents

 

CERTIFICATION

OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Michael J. Casey, Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of MAPICS, Inc., certify that:

 

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MAPICS, Inc.;

 

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 

  a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

  b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

  c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

  a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

  b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

6.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

Date: February 10, 2003

 

 

/s/ MICHAEL J. CASEY


Michael J. Casey

Vice President of Finance, Chief

Financial Officer and Treasurer

 

33