Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OMNOVA Solutions Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (330) 869-4200

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  x  No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes  x  No  ¨

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by nonaffiliates of the registrant was $340,173,450, based on the closing price per share of $8.56 on May 31, 2002, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

As of February 3, 2003, there were 39,916,420 outstanding shares of the Company’s Common Stock, 10¢ par value.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the 2003 Proxy Statement of OMNOVA Solutions Inc. are incorporated into Part III of this Report.

Table of Contents

OMNOVA Solutions Inc.

Annual Report on Form 10-K

For the Fiscal Year Ended November 30, 2002

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1.    Business

Introduction

OMNOVA Solutions Inc. (referred to in this report as OMNOVA Solutions, OMNOVA, the Company, we or our) became an independent publicly-traded company on October 1, 1999, when GenCorp Inc., our former parent company, distributed a dividend payable in one share of OMNOVA Solutions common stock for each share of GenCorp common stock held on the September 27, 1999 record date (the spin-off). OMNOVA Solutions is incorporated under the laws of the State of Ohio, and its headquarters is located at 175 Ghent Road, Fairlawn, Ohio 44333.

OMNOVA Solutions is an innovator of decorative and functional surfaces, emulsion polymers and specialty chemicals for a variety of commercial, industrial and residential end uses. Our products provide critical performance and aesthetic attributes to materials that people use daily. Over 75% of our sales are generated in product categories in which we maintain leading positions. OMNOVA’s leading positions have been built through innovative products, customized product solutions, strong brands, strong technical expertise, well-established distribution channels and long-standing customer relationships. We offer over 1,000 products, which helps our more than 2,000 customers differentiate their products in the marketplace. We utilize 18 strategically located manufacturing, marketing, development and design facilities in North America, Europe and Asia to service our broad customer base.

OMNOVA operates in two business segments: Decorative & Building Products and Performance Chemicals. Of our fiscal 2002 net sales, approximately 56% were derived from the Decorative & Building Products segment and 44% were derived from the Performance Chemicals segment. (Financial information relating to the Company’s business segments is set forth in Note R to the Consolidated Financial Statements on pages 45 through 47 of this report).

Decorative & Building Products

Background

Our Decorative & Building Products business began in 1945 when GenCorp (then known as The General Tire & Rubber Company) purchased the Jeannette, Pennsylvania coated fabrics facility from the Pennsylvania Rubber Company. In 1963, a production facility was built in Columbus, Mississippi to increase General Tire’s capacity and product offerings in coated fabrics. The manufacturing of commercial wallcovering was added at that plant in the early 1970s.

Decorative & Building Products expanded its commercial wallcovering capabilities in 1991 through the acquisition of Canadian General Towers’ commercial wallcovering business. With the 1998 acquisition of Walker Greenbank’s U.K.-based Muraspec commercial wallcovering businesses, Decorative & Building Products grew its leadership position in this product category. Muraspec provides a European manufacturing base and a distribution business with sales offices throughout the U.K. and Europe. Muraspec also serves as a key European distribution platform for marketing coated fabrics and other surfacing products.

The Reneer Films Division of Goodyear was acquired in 1993, increasing vinyl film and decorative laminate capability for the Decorative & Building Products business and elevating its position in vinyl woodgrain laminates to number one in North America. In 1997, the Printworld business of Technographics, Inc. was acquired, adding paper laminates to our vinyl laminate portfolio and gaining entry into transfer printing for home furnishings and apparel.

In 2001, OMNOVA Solutions acquired certain business lines and assets of Decorative Surfaces International, Inc. (DSI), including its commercial wallcovering, vinyl laminates and coated fabrics product lines.

1

Table of Contents

We have also pursued growth initiatives by entering into strategic alliances and joint ventures. In 1999, Decorative & Building Products formed a joint venture company with an affiliate of the Thailand-based Charoen Pokphand Group. The joint venture acquired a Rayong, Thailand-based decorative film and coated fabrics business to serve the decorative film and coated fabric product based markets in the Asia-Pacific region and provide expanded product lines to North America and Europe. In 2000, we formed another joint venture with the Charoen Pokphand Group, which acquired a Shanghai, China-based coated fabrics business to further strengthen and expand our position in China and the Asia-Pacific region and provide expanded product lines to Europe. Also in 2000, we formed Muraspec N.A. LLC, a joint venture with Brewster Wallpaper Corp., to serve as a national distributor for three of our wallcovering brands, Genon, Muraspec and Guard, and a diverse offering of other decorative and functional wall surfacing manufactured by others.

Our GenFlex roofing systems business was started in 1980 when GenCorp began manufacturing a single-ply vinyl product line (PVC). This business has expanded over the years to include the manufacturing of thermoplastic polyolefin (TPO) and sourcing of synthetic rubber (EPDM) membrane systems, making OMNOVA one of the largest suppliers of single-ply commercial roofing in North America. In 2001, we began production of single-ply roofing at a new manufacturing facility located in Muscle Shoals, Alabama.

Products

Our Decorative & Building Products segment develops, designs, produces and markets a broad line of decorative and functional surfacing products, including commercial wallcoverings, coated and performance fabrics, printed and solid color surface laminates, industrial films, transfer printed products and commercial roofing systems. These products are used in numerous applications, including building refurbishment and remodeling, new construction, furniture, cabinets, transportation, manufactured housing, retail display, consumer electronics, flooring and home furnishings. Our core competencies in design, coating, compounding, calendering, extruding, printing and embossing enable us to develop unique, aesthetically pleasing decorative surfaces that have functional properties that address specific customer needs. We have industry leading design capabilities, an extensive design library covering a broad range of styles, patterns, textures and colors and strong coating and processing capabilities to create product functionality solutions. Our broad range of products and end-use applications give us economies of scale in sourcing, manufacturing, design, technology and process development.

2

Table of Contents

The following table shows the products that our Decorative & Building Products segment develops, designs, produces and markets.

3

Table of Contents

Commercial Wallcoverings.    OMNOVA Solutions is the leading North American and European supplier of wallcoverings used in commercial applications. Our commercial wallcoverings are recognized for their leading designs as well as their strength, durability and cleanability. Our vinyl wallcoverings, in addition to their aesthetic appeal, reduce repair and maintenance costs for building owners by protecting wall surfaces, being easy to clean and having longer useful lives as compared to paint and paper wallcoverings. Applications for our commercial wallcoverings include refurbishment and new construction for the commercial office, hospitality, health care, retail, education and restaurant markets.

OMNOVA’s commercial wallcovering product lines include a broad range of fabric-backed vinyl and paper-backed vinyl wallcoverings. Our industry leading styling and design library covers a broad range of styles, patterns, textures and colors, both traditional and contemporary. In addition to leading design capabilities, our Decorative & Building Products segment’s strengths include its reputation for product durability and quality, its global distribution network, its extensive emboss and print roll library and its long-term customer relationships. In 2002, we became the first, and the only, commercial wallcovering producer to achieve GREENGUARD INDOOR AIR QUALITY CERTIFICATION^™ for our low VOC commercial wallcovering. Through proprietary technology, this low emissions product enhances indoor air quality, an increasing concern among building owners, architects and specifiers. Commercial wallcoverings represented 17.6% of our net sales for fiscal 2002, 18.2% of our net sales for fiscal 2001 and 18.2% of our net sales for fiscal 2000.

Coated Fabrics.    OMNOVA Solutions is a leading North American supplier of vinyl and urethane coated fabrics for commercial applications. Our durable coated fabrics are well-suited for demanding, high-use environments and offer a cost-effective alternative to other surfacing materials, such as leather and textile fabrics. We also offer high-performance coated woven fabrics, including Endurion-coated fabrics, which we introduced in 2002. This new coating technology, developed jointly with our Performance Chemicals segment, provides repeatable cleanability and superior stain resistance for high-traffic interior environments. Applications for our coated fabrics include:

Decorative Laminates.    OMNOVA Solutions is a leading North American supplier of paper and vinyl decorative laminates for wood and metal surfaces. Our decorative laminates are used as alternatives to wood, paint and high-pressure laminates in markets where durability, design flexibility and cost are key requirements. We provide our customers with a broad range of aesthetically pleasing designs as well as proprietary coating technology that provides enhanced durability and scratch and stain resistance. Applications for our decorative laminates include manufactured housing and recreational vehicle interiors, kitchen and bath cabinets, office furniture, consumer electronics, retail display, flooring and ready-to-assemble furniture.

A key strength of our decorative products business is our coating technology, including ultraviolet, electron beam, thermal cured and others, which provides durable finishes for high-use products and superior scratch and stain resistance. In addition, our decorative products business has further differentiated itself in the decorative laminate market as a single-source supplier of integrated vinyl and paper laminate designs for the furniture and cabinet industries, building a unique library of matched vinyl and paper laminate design patterns and textures and developing rapid make-to-order production capabilities. In 2002, we introduced Surf(x) decorative laminates for three-dimensional applications for the office furniture and display fixture markets. Surf(x) laminates offer a cost-effective alternative to high pressure laminates and provide furniture makers with design flexibility in rounded surfaces, eliminating the need for unsightly and expensive edge-banding.

4

Table of Contents

Commercial Roofing.    OMNOVA Solutions is a major North American supplier of single-ply roofing systems for the new and replacement commercial roofing markets. We are one of the few suppliers of all three single-ply roofing systems: EPDM, TPO and PVC. We manufacture ENERGY STAR certified TPO and PVC roofing systems that provide building owners with significant energy efficiencies. Additionally, we were the first to develop, and are the only producer of, a twelve-foot wide single-ply roofing system, which reduces installation time and cost for our customers.

Our broad commercial roofing product line, which we market under the GenFlex brand name, meets virtually any commercial roofing application requirement. In 2001, we began production of GenFlex products at our state-of-the-art extrusion plant located in Muscle Shoals, Alabama, where we produce our twelve-foot wide single-ply TPO and PVC roofing systems. GenFlex roofing systems represented 13.7% of our net sales for fiscal 2002, 15.4% of our net sales for fiscal 2001 and 13.7% of our net sales for fiscal 2000.

Markets and Customers

We believe that our Decorative & Building Products segment is a leader in its targeted product categories. The wallcovering, coated fabrics, decorative laminates, commercial roofing and other Decorative & Building Products categories are highly competitive based on decorative content, functional performance, price, quality, customer service, brand name recognition, distribution networks and reputation. Decorative & Building Products markets its products under numerous brand names to different industries. Certain of our better-known customers of this segment include Steelcase, LA-Z-Boy, Ashley, Patrick Industries and Herculite Products.

Marketing and Distribution

Our Decorative & Building Products segment distributes its products through a variety of channels. Commercial wallcoverings and commercial roofing products are marketed primarily through independent distributors to building owners, contractors, architects and other specifiers. Most of our wallcovering distributors are national in scope, providing us with the capability to cost-effectively market wallcovering products to regional commercial purchasers as well as those with a nationwide presence. Coated fabrics and decorative laminates are sold directly and through agents to manufacturers of cabinets, furniture, seating and other products. Many of our Decorative & Building Products segment’s products have strong, well-recognized brand names that are promoted through trade shows, industry periodicals and other media.

Competition

OMNOVA’s Decorative & Building Products segment competes with numerous companies, many of which are smaller and privately-owned. Key competitors in each product group include:

Performance Chemicals

Background

Our Performance Chemicals business began in 1952 as a segment of GenCorp (then known as The General Tire & Rubber Company). Initially, the business focused on the manufacture of styrene butadiene latex (or SB latex), an emulsion polymer, for the paper industry and SB vinyl pyridine latex for tire cord adhesives in its Mogadore, Ohio facility. During the 1960s, the business began expanding its product lines for the paper and carpet industries, and in 1993 started a SB latex plant in Green Bay, Wisconsin to better serve the needs of its paper customers in the upper Midwest. In 1996, SB latex capacity at the Mogadore, Ohio facility was substantially expanded.

5

Table of Contents

Performance Chemicals broadened its offerings to the paper industry with the 1996 acquisition of Morton International’s Lytron plastic pigment product line. The 1998 acquisition of Goodyear’s Calhoun, Georgia latex business provided additional manufacturing capacity, a strong presence in the southeast and an expanded customer base. In 1998, Performance Chemicals also acquired Sequa Chemicals’ U.S. specialty chemicals business, adding acrylic, vinyl acrylic and vinyl acetate latex, expanding existing emulsion polymer market positions and providing entry into new specialty chemical markets.

The fiscal year 1999 acquisition of PolymerLatex’s U.S. acrylics latex business in Fitchburg, Massachusetts provided a key northeast production location while strengthening and diversifying served markets in specialty acrylic emulsions. The 1999 acquisition of Morton International’s global floor care polymer business provided Performance Chemicals with several new emulsion polymer product lines and customers, based on complementary manufacturing technology.

On May 1, 2002, OMNOVA Solutions and the Rohm and Haas Company formed RohmNova, a joint venture for the purpose of marketing, selling and servicing latex binders, synthetic pigments and specialty chemical additives for coatings in the paper and paperboard industry. The joint venture has reduced our costs while providing total solutions capability to customers and offers a strong portfolio of complementary coating products for the paper and paperboard industry.

Products

OMNOVA Solutions’ Performance Chemicals segment produces a broad range of emulsion polymers and specialty chemicals based primarily on styrene butadiene, styrene butadiene acrylonitrile, vinyl acetate, acrylic, styrene acrylic, vinyl acrylic, glyoxal, and fluorochemical chemistries. We are North America’s second largest producer of SB latex and operate advanced, strategically located low-cost production facilities, which we believe provide us with an advantaged conversion cost position relative to our competitors. Our custom-formulated products are tailored for coatings, binders and adhesives, which are used in paper, carpet, nonwovens, textiles, construction, floor care, tape, tires, plastic parts and various other specialty chemical applications. Our products provide a variety of functional properties to enhance our customers’ products, including greater strength, adhesion, dimensional stability, water resistance, flow and leveling, improved processibility and enhanced appearance. Our Performance Chemicals segment is recognized for its core capabilities in emulsion polymer technology and for its ability to rapidly develop highly-customized products that provide innovative, cost-effective customer solutions.

6

Table of Contents

The following table shows the products that our Performance Chemicals segment produces and markets.

Specialty Chemicals.    OMNOVA is a leading supplier of specialty polymers and chemicals for a variety of niche product categories. Applications for our custom formulated specialty polymers and chemicals include nonwovens (such as diapers, engine filters, resilient flooring, and roofing mat), floor polish, tire cord adhesive and plastic part coatings. Our focus is developing unique products and customized applications that address specific customer needs, including enhanced functionality, improved environmental performance and lower cost through substitution of higher-cost materials.

A targeted growth area for Performance Chemicals is our proprietary fluorochemical technology platform known as PolyFox. PolyFox has unique properties as a surfactant for flow, leveling and wetting and as a surface modifier for stain and scratch resistance. PolyFox-enhanced products are being sold for floor care products, dry erasable wallcovering and decorative laminates. PolyFox is also environmentally-preferred as a replacement for competitive perfluorooctane sulfonate fluorochemicals-based products, some of which have been withdrawn from the market over environmental concerns. In fiscal 2001, we formed a strategic alliance with Daikin Industries, a leading fluorochemicals supplier, focused on developing proprietary fluorochemical raw materials for our PolyFox technology platform.

Paper Chemicals.    OMNOVA is a leading North American supplier of custom-formulated SB latex for paper and paperboard coatings. In addition, we produce a broad variety of specialty chemical additives for coating applications in the paper industry. Our products for the paper industry improve the strength, gloss, opacity, moisture resistance and printability of coated papers and paperboard. Applications for our products include paper and paperboard coatings used in magazines, catalogs, direct mail advertising, brochures, food cartons, household and other consumer and industrial packaging. Paper and paperboard coatings represented 17.5% of our net sales for fiscal 2002, 18.8% of our net sales for fiscal 2001 and 17.8% of our net sales for fiscal 2000.

7

Table of Contents

Carpet Chemicals.    OMNOVA is a leading North American supplier of custom-formulated SB latex used as carpet backing adhesive. Our products for the carpet industry secure carpet fibers to the carpet backing and meet the stringent manufacturing, environmental, odor, flammability and flexible installation requirements of our customers. Our strong historic position in residential carpeting has been recently enhanced by new product innovations in commercial carpeting backing adhesive that provide moisture barrier properties and can replace higher-cost polyurethanes.

Markets and Customers

The paper coating and carpet backing adhesive product categories are highly competitive based on price, quality, customer service, product performance, field technical support and product innovations. Major paper and carpet customers include International Paper, Shaw and Stora Enso.

Marketing and Distribution

Our Performance Chemicals segment primarily sells its products directly to manufacturers through an internal marketing, sales and technical service team focused on providing customized solutions.

Competition

Performance Chemicals competes with several large global chemical companies including Dow, BASF and Rohm and Haas, some of which are vertically integrated in one or more major raw materials. Performance Chemicals also competes with a variety of other suppliers of specialty chemicals including Noveon, Para-Chem, Air Products, National Starch and Johnson Polymers. Depending on the products involved and markets served, the basis of competition varies and may include price, quality, customer and technical service, product performance and innovation and industry recognition. Overall, our Performance Chemicals segment regards its products to be competitive in its major categories and we believe that we are a leader in several North American categories, including SB latex paper coatings and carpet backing binders, nonwoven binders and vinyl pyridine tire cord adhesives.

International Operations

Net sales from our foreign operations were $53.2 million in fiscal 2002, $61.4 million in fiscal 2001 and $65.5 million in fiscal 2000. These net sales represented 7.8% of our total net sales in fiscal 2002, 8.3% of our total net sales in fiscal 2001 and 8.5% of our total net sales in fiscal 2000. Long-lived assets consist of net property, plant and equipment and net goodwill. Long-lived assets of our foreign operations totaled $51.4 million at November 30, 2002 and $90.9 million at November 30, 2001. Our consolidated long-lived assets totaled $269.7 million at November 30, 2002 and $429.1 million at November 30, 2001.

Intellectual Property

We regard patents, trademarks, copyrights and other intellectual property as important to our success, and we rely on them in the United States and foreign countries to protect our investments in products and technology. Patents to which we have rights expire at various times, but we believe that the loss or expiration of any individual patent would not materially affect our business. We, like any other company, may be subject to claims of alleged infringement of the patents, trademarks and other intellectual property rights of third parties from time to time in the ordinary course of business.

Seasonal Factors

We historically experience stronger sales and income in our second, third and fourth fiscal quarters, comprised of the three-month periods ending May 31, August 31 and November 30. Our performance in the first

8

Table of Contents

fiscal quarter (December through February) has historically been weaker due to generally lower levels of construction and industrial activity over the holidays and cold weather months.

Environmental Matters

Our business operations, like those of other companies in the industries in which we operate, are subject to numerous federal, state, local and foreign environmental laws and regulations. These laws and regulations not only affect our current operations, but also could impose liability on us for past operations that were conducted in compliance with then applicable laws and regulations. A discussion of capital and noncapital expenditures incurred in 2002 and forecasted for 2003 for environmental compliance is included under the heading Environmental Matters on page 21 of this report and is incorporated herein by reference.

Employees

We employed approximately 2,400 employees at November 30, 2002 at offices, plants and other facilities located principally throughout the United States and the United Kingdom. At November 30, 2002, approximately 29% of our employees were covered by collective bargaining agreements with none of those employees covered by collective bargaining agreements due to expire within one year.

Raw Materials

Our Decorative & Building Products segment utilizes a variety of raw materials that are generally available from multiple suppliers. Key raw materials include polyvinyl chloride resins, textiles, plasticizers, paper and titanium dioxide. Textiles and polyvinyl chloride resins represent approximately 40% of our total raw materials purchased on a dollar basis in fiscal 2002 for this segment.

Our Performance Chemicals segment also utilizes a variety of raw materials, primarily monomers, in the manufacture of our products, all of which are generally available from multiple suppliers. Monomer costs are a major component of the emulsion polymers produced by the business. Key monomers include styrene, butadiene, acrylates and vinyl acetate. These monomers represented approximately 59% of our total raw materials purchased on a dollar basis in fiscal 2002 for this segment.

The cost of these raw materials has a significant impact on our profitability. We generally attempt to pass increased raw material prices on to our customers in the form of price increases. The success of attempted price increases depends on a variety of factors including the competitive environment. Under certain circumstances, we are not able to pass along the increase. In addition, if accepted by customers, price increases generally lag the increase in raw material costs.

Research and Development

The OMNOVA Solutions Technology Center in Akron, Ohio supports research and development efforts across our business and develops technologies focused on significant functionality enhancement in existing products as well as new product platforms. Information relating to research and development expense is set forth in Note G to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 37 of this report.

Available Information

We make available free of charge on our website, www.omnova.com, all materials that we file electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file or furnish such materials to the SEC.

9

Table of Contents

Item 2.    Properties

The Company’s significant operating, manufacturing, distribution, research, design and/or sales and marketing facilities are set forth below:

For a further discussion of our leased properties, please refer to Note N to the Consolidated Financial Statements appearing on page 42 of this report.

During fiscal 2002, we generally made effective use of our productive capacity. We believe that the quality and productive capacity of our properties are sufficient to maintain our competitive position for the foreseeable future.

10

Table of Contents

Item 3.    Legal Proceedings

On October 12, 2000, a group of former GenCorp employees who retired from GenCorp facilities filed a purported class action lawsuit in Federal District Court for the Northern District of Ohio against GenCorp Inc. and us, and certain retiree medical plans of both companies, seeking certain retiree medical benefits. The retirees seek to certify a class consisting of all eligible retirees at 12 plants formerly represented by the United Rubber Workers. The plaintiffs’ claims are based primarily on certain GenCorp labor agreements, which expired in the mid-1990’s or earlier, and GenCorp’s adoption of a replacement retiree health care plan that capped benefit levels. The court recently denied our motion for summary judgement. We believe we have meritorious defenses to this lawsuit as well as a right of indemnification from GenCorp. We believe that the likelihood that we will incur liability materially affecting our consolidated financial condition is remote.

We are subject to various legal actions, governmental investigations and proceedings relating to a wide range of matters. In the opinion of our management, after reviewing the information that is currently available with respect to these matters and consulting with counsel, any liability that may ultimately be incurred with respect to these matters will not materially affect our consolidated financial condition. The effect of resolution of these matters on results of operations cannot be predicted because any such effect depends on both future results of operations and the amount and timing of the resolution of such matters.

Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

No matters were submitted to a vote of OMNOVA Solutions’ security holders, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise, during the quarter ended November 30, 2002.

Item 4A.    Executive Officers of the Registrant

The following information is given as of February 1, 2003, and except as otherwise indicated, each individual has held the same office during the preceding five-year period.

Kevin M. McMullen, age 42, Mr. McMullen has been Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company since February 2001. Prior to that, Mr. McMullen served as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company from December 2000 and as a Director from March 2000. From January 2000 until December 2000, Mr. McMullen served as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, and from September 1999 to January 2000, Mr. McMullen served as Vice President of the Company and President, Decorative & Building Products. Previously, Mr. McMullen was Vice President of GenCorp Inc. and President of GenCorp’s Decorative & Building Products business unit from September 1996 until the spin-off of OMNOVA Solutions in October 1999. Prior to that, Mr. McMullen was General Manager of General Electric Corporation’s Commercial & Industrial Lighting business from 1993 to 1996 and General Manager of General Electric Lighting’s Business Development and Strategic Planning activities from 1991 to 1993.

Michael E. Hicks, age 44, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of OMNOVA Solutions Inc. since its formation. Prior to the spin-off of OMNOVA Solutions in October 1999, Mr. Hicks served as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of GenCorp Inc. from February 1999 and as Treasurer of GenCorp from September 1994 to February 1999.

James J. Hohman, age 54, Vice President of the Company since November 2001 and President, Paper & Carpet Chemicals since December 2000; Vice President, Specialty Chemicals from March 2000 until November 2000; and Vice President, Paper Chemicals from the spin-off of the Company from GenCorp Inc. in October 1999 until March 2000. Prior to the spin-off, Mr. Hohman served for GenCorp Inc. as Vice President, Paper Chemicals from November 1998 until October 1999 and as Director, Strategic Business Development, Performance Chemicals business unit from March 1996 until October 1998. Previously, Mr. Hohman held several key business and marketing management positions at BP Chemicals from 1982 until 1996, most recently serving as General Manager, Barex Resins.

11

Table of Contents

James C. LeMay, age 46, Senior Vice President, Business Development; General Counsel of OMNOVA Solutions Inc. since December 1, 2000; previously Senior Vice President, Law and General Counsel of OMNOVA Solutions Inc. since its formation. Prior to the spin-off of OMNOVA Solutions in October 1999, Mr. LeMay also served as Assistant General Counsel of GenCorp Inc. from May 1997, and as Senior Counsel of GenCorp from May 1990 to May 1997.

Gregory T. Troy, age 47, Senior Vice President, Human Resources of OMNOVA Solutions Inc. since September 1999. Mr. Troy served as Director, Human Resources of GenCorp Inc.’s Performance Chemicals business unit from December 1996 until the spin-off of OMNOVA Solutions in October 1999. Previously, Mr. Troy served as Director, Human Resources, of Bosch Braking Systems (formerly AlliedSignal) from 1995 to December 1996, and Employee Relations Area Manager, Manufacturing, of Mobil Corporation’s Plastics division from 1994 to 1995.

Douglas E. Wenger, age 46, Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer of the Company since November 2001. Prior to joining OMNOVA in October 2001, Mr. Wenger served as Director, Global I/T Strategy and Architecture from 2000 until 2001; as Global Program Director, Enterprise Business Applications from 1996 until 2000; Director, Business Information Development, Worldwide Research & Development from 1993 until 1996; and as Director, North American Information Systems and Database Development from 1991 until 1993, in each case for Kellogg Company, a manufacturer and marketer of ready-to-eat cereal and convenience foods.

The Company’s executive officers generally hold terms of office of one year and/or until their successors are elected.

12

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5.    Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

The Company’s common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and trades under the symbol OMN. At December 31, 2002, there were approximately 10,100 holders of record of the Company’s common stock. The Company has not paid a quarterly cash dividend since the second quarter of 2001. Previously, the Company paid a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Information regarding the high and low quarterly sales prices of the Company’s common stock is contained in the Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) which appears on page 48 of this report and is incorporated herein by reference.

Information concerning long-term debt appears in Note M to the Consolidated Financial Statements and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 6.    Selected Financial Data

The following table sets forth the Company’s selected historical financial data. The selected historical financial data as of November 30, 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and for each of the five years in the period ended November 30, 2002 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. The Company was spun off from GenCorp Inc. as an independent public company as of October 1, 1999.

13

Table of Contents

You should keep the following in mind when reviewing this data:

Item 7.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The Company is an innovator of decorative and functional surfaces, emulsion polymers and specialty chemicals for a variety of commercial, industrial and residential end uses. The Company operates in two business segments: Decorative & Building Products and Performance Chemicals. Decorative & Building Products segment develops, designs, produces and markets a broad line of decorative and functional surfacing products, including commercial wallcoverings, coated and performance fabrics, printed and solid color surface laminates, industrial films, transfer printed products and commercial roofing systems. These products are used in numerous applications, including building refurbishment and remodeling, new construction, furniture, cabinets, transportation, manufactured housing, retail display, consumer electronics, flooring and home furnishings. Performance Chemicals segment produces a broad range of emulsion polymers and specialty chemicals based primarily on styrene butadiene, styrene butadiene acrylonitrile, vinyl acetate, acrylic, styrene acrylic, vinyl acrylic, glyoxal and fluorochemical chemistries. Performance Chemicals’ custom-formulated products include coatings, binders and adhesives, which are used in paper, carpet, nonwovens, textiles, construction, floor care, tires, plastic parts and various other specialty chemical applications.

OMNOVA was spun off from GenCorp Inc. as an independent public company as of October 1, 1999. In the past, the Company has pursued both organic growth as well as growth through joint ventures, strategic alliances, as well as selected acquisitions. During fiscal 1998, the Company acquired Walker Greenbank’s U.K.-based Muraspec commercial wallcovering business. During fiscal 1999, the Company formed a joint venture with the Thailand-based Charoen Pokphand Group in a Rayong, Thailand-based decorative film and coated fabrics business to serve the Asia-Pacific region and provide expanded product lines to North America and Europe, and the Company acquired the global floor care polymer business of Morton International Inc. and the U.S. acrylic emulsion polymers business of PolymerLatex, Inc. During fiscal 2000, the Company formed a national distribution joint venture, Muraspec N.A. LLC (MNA), with Brewster Wallpaper Corp. to distribute three of the Company’s wallcovering brands and a diverse offering of other commercial wallcoverings and a joint venture with an affiliate of the Thailand-based Charoen Pokphand Group in a Shanghai, China-based coated fabrics business to serve the Asia-Pacific region. During fiscal 2001 and fiscal 2002, the Company purchased certain business lines and assets of Decorative Surfaces International, Inc. or DSI.

14

Table of Contents

In May 2002, the Company formed RohmNova, a joint venture formed with the Rohm and Haas Company, for the purpose of marketing, selling and servicing latex binders, synthetic pigments and specialty chemical additives for coatings in the paper and paperboard industry. The joint venture has reduced the Company’s costs, while providing total solutions capability to customers and offers a strong portfolio of complementary coating products for the paper and paperboard industry.

The sales in each of the Company’s segments are affected by numerous factors. In the Decorative & Building Products segment, sales are impacted by the level of spending on office building, hotel, hospital, retail, education, restaurant refurbishment and new construction, and, to a lesser extent, institutional furniture sales, manufactured housing shipments and residential refurbishment and new construction. Product aesthetics, including color and design, as well as functional performance, including stain and scratch resistance are important differentiators.

In the Performance Chemicals segment, the key sales drivers are the ability to create custom polymer and specialty chemical solutions to enhance customer product performance, price and domestic demand for coated paper and carpeting.

The Company is subject to changes in its manufacturing costs arising from volatility in the price of several key raw materials including styrene, butadiene and polyvinyl chloride resins. Recently, the prices of styrene and butadiene have rapidly increased. The cost of raw materials has a significant impact on the Company’s profitability. Historically, the Company has generally been able to increase its prices to offest some or all of the raw material price inflation.

On January 29, 2003, the Company announced a restructuring program that has resulted in a workforce reduction of approximately 70 employees or 7 percent of its domestic salaried workforce. The Company will accrue a restructuring provision of approximately $1.4 million primarily in the first quarter of fiscal 2003. Both business segments and the Corporate Headquarters have been affected by the restructuring effort. The Company anticipates that these workforce reductions, as well as other expense reduction initiatives, will result in annualized savings of approximately $8.0 million.

Results of Operations of Fiscal 2002 Compared to Fiscal 2001

Net sales for the Company in fiscal 2002 decreased 7.6 percent to $681.2 million compared to $737.0 million in fiscal 2001, with sales declining in both business segments. Segment operating profit, excluding unusual and nonrecurring items, decreased to $22.2 million in fiscal 2002 from $32.1 million in fiscal 2001 primarily due to a decrease in sales volume, changes in product mix and rising raw material costs. Operating margins, excluding unusual and nonrecurring items in fiscal 2002, declined to 3.3 percent from 4.4 percent in fiscal 2001. Total segment operating profit, including unusual and nonrecurring items, increased to $24.5 million in fiscal 2002 from $18.4 million in fiscal 2001. The Company had net income before the cumulative effect of accounting change of $7.0 million in fiscal 2002 compared to a net loss of $6.7 million in fiscal 2001. Effective December 1, 2001, the Company adopted SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, which established financial accounting and reporting for acquired goodwill and other intangible assets. Upon adoption, the Company recorded a one-time noncash charge of $142.5 million ($3.58 per diluted share) as the cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax. Including the cumulative effect of accounting change, the Company incurred a net loss of $135.5 million.

Net sales for Decorative & Building Products decreased to $381.8 million in fiscal 2002 from $416.1 million in fiscal 2001, an 8.2 percent decrease. The decline was driven by continued overall market softness both in the U.S. and U.K. affecting most of the Company’s end-use markets. Commercial Wallcovering volume was most affected by the slowdown in the corporate and hospitality markets driven by lower occupancy rates in both segments. The Coated Fabrics product line declined slightly versus last year as weakness in the commercial upholstery market was partially offset by higher volume in the transportation market due to important new business obtained during the year. The overall decline in Decorative Products was mitigated somewhat by volume increases in Decorative Laminates due to new business in the manufactured housing sector.

15

Table of Contents

Within Building Products, GenFlex roofing sales declined due to overall market softness in commercial construction and lower volume of refurbishment activity. Segment operating profit, excluding unusual and nonrecurring items, declined to $2.3 million in fiscal 2002 from $13.3 million in fiscal 2001. The decline in segment operating profit was primarily attributable to the decreases in volume and changes in product mix. Excluding unusual and nonrecurring items, segment operating profit margins declined to 0.6 percent in fiscal 2002 from 3.2 percent in fiscal 2001.

The segment operating profit of Decorative & Building Products was positively impacted in fiscal 2002 by $3.4 million, due to last-in, first-out (LIFO) inventory adjustments compared to $1.2 million in fiscal 2001. Inventories were significantly reduced as a result of initiatives to aggressively improve working capital. Operating performance was negatively impacted by increases in the warranty reserve of $2.0 million for Building Products and bad debt reserves of $0.5 million primarily as a result of poor economic conditions in certain Eastern European countries.

Net sales for Performance Chemicals decreased to $299.4 million in fiscal 2002 from $320.9 million in fiscal 2001, a 6.7 percent decrease. The overall decline was attributable primarily to volume declines in paper coatings and specialty chemicals, as a result of a soft economy, exiting low margin business in conjunction with the Greensboro facility closing and decreased selling prices in paper products. Segment operating profit, excluding unusual and nonrecurring items, increased to $19.9 million in fiscal 2002 from $18.8 million in fiscal 2001. The increase in operating profit resulted from cost reduction initiatives, moderating raw material costs in the first half of the year and favorable utility costs partially offset by declines related to sales pricing and volume. Segment operating margins, excluding unusual and nonrecurring items, increased to 6.6 percent in fiscal 2002 from 5.9 percent in fiscal 2001.

Segment operating profit for both Decorative & Building Products and Performance Chemicals was favorably impacted in 2002 by a reduction in amortization expense of $2.8 million and $3.0 million, respectively, from the adoption of SFAS No. 142.

In fiscal 2002, the Company recognized income for unusual and nonrecurring items of $2.6 million, which related primarily to the sale of the Greensboro, North Carolina facility for $2.2 million, the reversal of unused reserves primarily related to the 2001 restructuring plan for $1.1 million offset by $0.7 million of severance expense. The $0.7 million charge ($0.7 million net of tax, or $.02 per diluted share) related to the reduction of approximately 45 employees in the Decorative & Building Products segment and was fully utilized at November 30, 2002.

Interest expense decreased to $8.1 million in fiscal 2002 from $14.0 million in fiscal 2001. The decrease was attributable to lower overall interest rates and average debt levels in fiscal 2002.

Corporate expense decreased to $4.1 million in fiscal 2002 from $5.2 million in fiscal 2001. The decrease was attributable to focused cost reductions.

Income tax expense increased to $0.5 million in fiscal 2002 from a benefit of $4.2 million in fiscal 2001. The increase in tax expense was due to positive earnings from continuing operations in fiscal 2002. The effective tax rate for fiscal 2002 was reduced to 7 percent, below the statutory rate of 35 percent, due to the recognition of the benefit of deferred tax assets for which a valuation allowance had previously been provided.

Results of Operations of Fiscal 2001 Compared to Fiscal 2000

Net sales for the Company in fiscal 2001 decreased 4.7 percent to $737.0 million compared to $773.3 million in fiscal 2000, with sales declining in both business segments. Segment operating profit, excluding unusual and nonrecurring items, decreased to $32.1 million in fiscal 2001 from $42.1 million in fiscal 2000 primarily due to a decrease in sales volume and product mix and startup costs associated with the Company’s new commercial roofing extrusion plant in Alabama. Excluding unusual and nonrecurring items,

16

Table of Contents

operating margins in fiscal 2001 declined to 4.4 percent from 5.4 percent in fiscal 2000. Total segment operating profit, including unusual and nonrecurring items, decreased to $18.4 million in fiscal 2001 from $41.8 million in fiscal 2000. Including unusual and nonrecurring items, the Company incurred a net loss of $6.7 million in fiscal 2001 compared to net income of $4.4 million in fiscal 2000.

Net sales for Decorative & Building Products decreased to $416.1 million in fiscal 2001 from $429.8 million in fiscal 2000, a 3.2 percent decrease. The decline related to overall market softness in the U.S. and U.K., affecting most of the Company’s end-use markets. The decline was partially offset by incremental volume due to the full year impact of MNA and the acquisition of product lines from DSI during the second half of 2001. Commercial Wallcovering volume was most affected by the slowdown in the commercial office and the hospitality segment driven by an overall economic slowdown, which was further exacerbated by the tragic events of September 11 while in Coated Fabrics the closure of several major furniture outlets and the dramatic decline in the marine industry drove volume down. Decorative Laminates’ sales decline was in line with its markets as the manufactured housing segment declined for the third year in a row coupled with new downward trends in furniture and consumer electronics. Within Building Products, GenFlex roofing sales increased on the strength of TPO and PVC products. Segment operating profit, excluding unusual and nonrecurring items, declined to $13.3 million in fiscal 2001 from $38.4 million in fiscal 2000. The decline in segment operating profit was attributable to the decrease in volume and changes in product mix. Excluding unusual and nonrecurring items, segment operating margins declined to 3.2 percent in fiscal 2001 from 8.9 percent in fiscal 2000.

The segment operating profit of Decorative & Building Products was positively impacted in fiscal 2001 by $1.2 million, due to last-in, first-out (LIFO) inventory adjustments compared to $4.3 million in fiscal 2000. Inventories were significantly reduced as a result of initiatives to aggressively improve working capital.

Net sales for Performance Chemicals decreased to $320.9 million in fiscal 2001 from $343.5 million in fiscal 2000, a 6.6 percent decrease. Sales volume declined across all product lines primarily as a result of a soft economy and the rationalization of certain products following the closure of the Greensboro, North Carolina facility. Volume declines were most prevalent in Specialty Chemicals, particularly in textiles, adhesives and construction. The decline in volume was partially offset by the impact of product price increases. Segment operating profit, excluding unusual and nonrecurring items, increased to $18.8 million in fiscal 2001 from $3.7 million in fiscal 2000. The increase resulted from cost reduction initiatives, pricing actions, product mix, rationalization of low margin products and moderating raw material costs. Excluding unusual and nonrecurring items, segment operating margins increased to 5.9 percent in fiscal 2001 from 1.1 percent in fiscal 2000.

As a result of the restructuring plan implemented in the second quarter of 2001, an unusual and nonrecurring charge of $16.5 million ($9.9 million net of tax, or $0.25 per diluted share) was recorded. The charge primarily related to the closure of the Company’s Greensboro, North Carolina facility (Performance Chemicals segment) and workforce reductions. The implementation of these actions resulted in the reduction of approximately 90 employees in the Performance Chemicals segment and Corporate Headquarters. The $16.5 million unusual and nonrecurring charge consisted of $1.2 million for inventory write-downs included in cost of products sold, $8.5 million in fixed asset write-downs and $2.0 million of shutdown costs related to the Greensboro facility, and $4.8 million for severance and additional pension expense related to workforce reductions in the Performance Chemicals segment and Corporate Headquarters. As of November 30, 2001, $3.4 million of severance benefits and $0.8 million of shutdown costs had been utilized, and the Company had remaining reserves of approximately $1.4 million for severance and $1.2 million for shutdown costs. As of November 30, 2002, severance benefits and shutdown costs had been fully utilized. In addition, the Company recorded $2.2 million primarily for anticipated legal settlements of which a reserve of $1.7 million remained at November 30, 2001. As of November 30, 2002 the reserve had been fully utilized.

Interest expense decreased to $14.0 million in fiscal 2001 from $14.7 million in fiscal 2000. The decrease was attributable to lower overall interest rates, which was offset partially by higher average debt levels in fiscal 2001.

17

Table of Contents

Financial Resources and Capital Spending

Cash flow provided from operating activities was $31.4 million in fiscal 2002, compared to $20.4 million in fiscal 2001 and $120.2 million in fiscal 2000. The increase in cash flow of $11.0 million between 2002 and 2001 resulted primarily from an improvement (reduction) in working capital. The decrease in cash flow from operating activities between fiscal 2001 and fiscal 2000 of $99.8 million resulted primarily from a net change of $87.8 million related to the terms of the receivable sale program (see Note I to the Consolidated Financial Statements) and the payment in 2001 of $10.0 million of early retirement obligations. Excluding the receivable sale program, the results of operations would have been $46.3 million in 2000.

In fiscal 2002, $3.7 million was used for investing activities which consisted primarily of capital expenditures of $11.1 million, the completion of the DSI acquisition of $2.0 million, offset by the sale of the Greensboro facility and the Corporate Headquarters’ Offices resulting in cash proceeds of approximately $9.4 million. In fiscal 2001, $20.0 million was used for investing activities primarily for capital expenditures. In fiscal 2000, $50.6 million was used for investing activities including capital expenditures of $35.3 million, investments in joint ventures of $12.9 million and acquisitions of businesses of $2.4 million.

Cash flow used in financing activities was $28.2 million, $3.6 million and $67.8 million in fiscal 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Cash flow used in fiscal 2002 was primarily attributable to debt reduction. Cash flow used in fiscal 2001 was primarily for dividend payments. Cash flow used in fiscal 2000 related primarily to the utilization of proceeds received from the receivable sale program to reduce debt obligations which was offset by dividend payments and the repurchase of the Company’s stock.

Capital expenditures were made and are planned principally for asset replacement, new product capability, cost reduction, safety and productivity improvements and environmental protection. Capital expenditures totaled $11.1 million for fiscal 2002, $19.5 million in fiscal 2001 and $35.3 million in fiscal 2000. Capital expenditures in fiscal 2002 were primarily equipment upgrades and additions. Capital expenditures in fiscal 2001 included $6.7 million for the new extruder facility in Muscle Shoals, Alabama and $12.8 million of equipment upgrades and additions. Capital expenditures in fiscal 2000 included $8.0 million for the extruder facility, $2.0 million for Performance Chemicals’ renovation of its pilot plant, $2.0 million for capacity expansion and $23.3 million for equipment upgrades and additions. The Company plans to fund substantially all of its capital expenditures from cash flow generated from operations. If necessary, a portion of capital expenditures will be funded through borrowings under its credit facility.

On April 12, 2001, the Company entered into an amended, secured $240 million revolving credit facility (Facility) which expires in September 2004. The Facility is collateralized by substantially all of the Company’s assets. On September 13, 2002, the Company amended its $240 million Facility. Pursuant to this amendment, the Facility was reduced to $200 million and certain debt covenants were amended. The Company utilized $129.5 million of this facility as of November 30, 2002. The Company’s total debt outstanding at November 30, 2002, was $132.5 million and its average debt outstanding during the year was $173.5 million.

The Company pays a variable commitment fee, which is currently 40 basis points, on the unused balance. At November 30, 2002, the unused and available balance under the Facility was $70.5 million. Interest rates are variable, primarily based on LIBOR, and were at an average rate of 4.4 percent at November 30, 2002. The Facility contains a provision that allows for a swing line of credit for up to $10 million for daily funding requirements, which was utilized for $6.0 million at November 30, 2002. The interest rate on the swing line of credit is variable, primarily based on the prime interest rate, and was 5.0 percent at November 30, 2002. The Company had outstanding letters of credit totaling $4.5 million at November 30, 2002.

The Facility contains various debt and investment restrictions and provisions. The Company was required to maintain a consolidated leverage ratio (Debt/EBITDA) of less than 4.75 to 1.00 for the quarter ending November 30, 2002. Additionally, the Minimum Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio was amended to 3.00 to

18

Table of Contents

1.00 for the quarter ending November 30, 2002. The Company is also required to maintain a minimum net worth of $260 million excluding the effects of adopting SFAS No. 142. The Company was in compliance with all of its covenants at November 30, 2002.

On February 3, 2003, the Company amended the Facility. Pursuant to this amendment, the Facility was reduced to $185 million on February 3, 2003, and declines to $180 million on May 31, 2003 and to $175 million on November 30, 2003 and thereafter. The Debt/EBITDA covenant was amended to 5.50 to 1.00 for the quarter ending February 28, 2003, 5.75 to 1.00 for the quarter ending May 31, 2003, 4.75 to 1.00 for the quarter ending August 31, 2003, 4.00 to 1.00 for the quarters ending November 30, 2003 and February 29, 2004 and 3.25 to 1.00 thereafter. The interest coverage ratio was also amended to 2.25 to 1.00 as of February 28, 2003. In addition, interest rates will be based on the prime rate with monthly step-ups during the life of the Facility.

The Company maintains a receivable backed commercial paper program under which the Company may sell up to $60 million of trade receivables through a special purpose entity. At November 30, 2002, the program was utilized for $55.1 million. The Company uses the proceeds from the sale of trade receivables to reduce its borrowings under the Facility. The program is due to expire in June 2003.

Under the Facility, as recently amended, the Company expects its annual interest expense to increase due to the monthly step-ups in rates. The Company is exploring alternative financing options for the replacement of the Facility and the receivable sale program.

Based upon current and anticipated levels of operations, the Company believes that its cash flow from operations, combined with borrowings that will be available under the Facility, will be sufficient to enable the Company to meet its current and anticipated cash operating requirements, including scheduled interest and principal payments, capital expenditures and working capital needs for the next twelve months. Currently, substantially all of the Company’s long-term debt bears interest at variable rates; therefore, the Company’s liquidity and financial condition will continue to be affected by changes in prevailing interest rates.

Significant Accounting Policies and Management Judgments

The Company’s discussion and analysis of its results of operations, financial condition and liquidity are based upon the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of November 30, 2002, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to product returns, accounts receivable, inventories, warranty obligations, litigation and environmental reserves, pensions and income taxes. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. The Company reviews its estimates to ensure that the estimates appropriately reflect changes in its business or as new information becomes available. Actual results may materially differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Management believes the following critical accounting policies affect its more significant estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements:

A)    Revenue Recognition

Sales are recognized when both title and risk of loss transfer to the customer, which is upon shipment. Sales are recorded net of an allowance for sales returns and rebate programs. Sales returns are estimated based upon historical returns. The Company also records estimated reductions to revenue for quantity rebates. If the actual costs of sales returns and rebate programs significantly exceed the recorded estimated allowance, the Company’s sales would be adversely affected.

B)    Allowance For Doubtful Accounts

The Company’s policy is to identify all specific customers that would be considered doubtful based upon the customer’s financial condition, payment history, credit rating and other relevant factors, or those that have been turned over for collection and to reserve for the portion of those outstanding balances that

19

Table of Contents

collection does not appear to be likely. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an inability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. The allowance for doubtful accounts was approximately $3.5 million at November 30, 2002.

C)    Allowance For Inventory Obsolescence

The Company’s policy is to maintain an inventory obsolescence reserve based upon specifically identified, discontinued or obsolete items and a percentage of quantities on hand compared with usage and sales levels over the last year to two years. The policy has been applied on a consistent basis for all years presented. A sudden and unexpected change in design trends and/or preferences for patterns, colors and/or material could reduce the rate of inventory turnover and require the Company to increase its reserve for obsolescence. The reserve for inventory obsolescence was approximately $11.0 million at November 30, 2002.

D)    Allowance For Warranty Claims

On an on-going basis, the Company updates its building systems warranty reserve for specifically identified or new matters and a detailed study of the reserve is updated on a semi-annual basis to reserve for estimated future costs associated with any open warranty year. The reserve is a highly sensitive estimate based on historical costs and failure rates. A change in these factors could result in a significant change in the reserve balance. The warranty reserve at November 30, 2002 was approximately $13.5 million.

E)    Litigation and Environmental Reserves

The Company reserves for the probable costs associated with any legal claims and environmental remediation projects. The Company’s legal department performs on-going analyses of legal claims and remediation efforts. Reserves are based upon their analyses and established at the best estimate. The Company’s reserves for legal claims and environmental remediation efforts at November 30, 2002 were $0.7 million and $0.8 million, respectively.

F)    Pensions

The Company accounts for its defined benefit pension plans in accordance with SFAS No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions” which requires that amounts recognized in financial statements be determined on an actuarial basis. SFAS No. 87 and the policies used by the Company, notably the use of a calculated value of plan assets (which is further described below), generally reduced the volatility of pension income (expense) from changes in pension liability discount rates and the performance of the pension plan’s assets.

The most significant element in determining the Company’s pension income (expense) in accordance with SFAS No. 87 is the expected return on plan assets. The Company has assumed that the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets will be 8.75 percent. Based on the Company’s existing and forecasted asset allocation and related long-term investment performance results, the Company believes that its assumption of future returns of 8.75 percent is reasonable. The assumed long-term rate of return on assets is applied to a calculated value of plan assets, which recognizes changes in the fair value of plan assets in a systematic manner over five years. This produces the expected return on plan assets that is included in pension income (expense). The difference between this expected return and the actual return on plan assets is deferred. The net deferral of past asset gains (losses) affects the calculated value of plan assets and, ultimately, future pension income (expense). The plan assets have earned a rate of return substantially less than 8.75 percent in the last two years. Should this trend continue, future pension income would likely decline.

The Company determines the discount rate to be used to discount plan liabilities at its measurement date, August 31. The discount rate reflects the current rate at which the pension liabilities could be effectively settled at the end of the year. In estimating this rate, the Company looks to rates of return on high quality, fixed-income investments that receive one of the two highest ratings given by a recognized ratings

20

Table of Contents

agency. At August 31, 2002, the Company determined this rate to be 7.25 percent. Changes in discount rates over the past three years have not materially affected pension income (expense), and the net effect of changes in the discount rate, as well as the net effect of other changes in actuarial assumptions and experience, have been deferred as allowed by SFAS No. 87.

At November 30, 2002, the Company’s consolidated prepaid pension asset was $55.4 million compared to $49.6 million at the end of 2001. The increase was principally due to the recognition of pension income. For the year ended November 30, 2002, the Company recognized consolidated pretax pension income of $5.4 million.

G)    Tax Valuation Allowance

The Company provided a valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets due to the uncertainty of recovery of such assets. As of November 30, 2002, the Company had approximately $55.2 million of net deferred tax assets primarily related to domestic loss carryforwards that expire by 2022, goodwill impairment losses created as a result of the cumulative effect of an accounting change and other temporary differences for which a valuation allowance of $55.2 million has been provided. The Company provided a valuation allowance for its deferred tax assets after having considered its recent history of limited income since its spin-off from GenCorp, projections of future taxable income and on-going prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance.

Environmental Matters

The Company’s policy is to conduct its businesses with due regard for the preservation and protection of the environment. The Company devotes significant resources and management attention to comply with environmental laws and regulations. The Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet as of November 30, 2002 reflects reserves for environmental remediation efforts of $0.8 million.

Capital expenditures for projects related to the environment were $1.3 million in 2002, $2.3 million in 2001 and $2.2 million in 2000. The Company currently forecasts that capital expenditures for environmental projects will be approximately $1.8 million in fiscal 2003. During 2002, noncapital expenditures for environmental compliance and protection totaled $5.0 million, all of which were for recurring costs associated with managing hazardous substances and pollution abatement in ongoing operations. Similar noncapital expenditures were $4.4 million and $6.3 million in 2001 and 2000, respectively. The Company anticipates that noncapital environmental expenditures for the next several years will be consistent with historical expenditure levels.

Management believes, on the basis of presently available information, that resolution of known environmental matters will not materially affect liquidity, capital resources or the consolidated financial condition of the Company. The effect of resolution of these matters on results of operations cannot be predicted because any such effect depends on both future results of operations and the amount and timing of the resolution of such matters. However, there can be no assurance that future costs and liabilities will not exceed the Company’s reserves or be material.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In 1998 and 2000, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” and its related amended Statements No. 137 and 138. In fiscal 2001, the Company adopted these statements and they did not have a significant effect on earnings or the financial position of the Company.

In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations,” which eliminates the pooling method of accounting for all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 and addresses the initial recognition and measurement of goodwill and other intangible assets acquired in a business combination. The Company adopted this standard for business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001.

21

Table of Contents

In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.” This standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. The Company is assessing whether this statement will have a significant impact on its financial statements.

In October 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” This standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. The Company does not expect this statement to have a significant impact on its financial statements.

Effective December 1, 2001, the Company adopted SFAS No. 142 (see Note C to the Consolidated Financial Statements), “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” which establishes financial accounting and reporting for acquired goodwill and other intangible assets and supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion 17, “Intangible Assets”. Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets are no longer amortized but are reviewed at least annually for impairment. Separable intangible assets that have finite useful lives will continue to be amortized over their useful lives.

In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, “Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections”, which supersedes the aforementioned statements. The Company adopted this standard effective May 31, 2002. The standard did not have an impact on the Company.

In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.” This standard is effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. The Company is assessing whether this statement will have a significant impact on its financial statements.

Forward-Looking Statements

This annual report includes “forward-looking statements,” as defined by federal securities laws with respect to the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and business and the Company’s expectations or beliefs concerning future events. Words such as, but not limited to, “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “targets,” “likely,” “will,” “would,” “could,” and similar expressions or phrases identify forward-looking statements.

All forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Many risks and uncertainties are inherent in the end-use markets in which the Company operates. Others are more specific to the Company’s operations. The occurrence of the events described, and the achievement of expected results, depend on many events, some or all of which are not predictable or within the Company’s control. Actual results may differ materially from expected results.

Factors that may cause actual results to differ from expected results include, among others:

22

Table of Contents

All future written and verbal forward-looking statements attributable to the Company or any person acting on the Company’s behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to above. The Company undertakes no obligation, and specifically declines any obligation, other than that imposed by law, to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed in this annual report might not occur.

Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates on long-term debt obligations. Currently, the Company does not use derivative financial instruments to manage its interest rate risk. Substantially all of the Company’s debt, which is under the amended revolving credit facility described in Note M to the Consolidated Financial Statements, matures in 2004 and is variable. The average variable interest rate applicable to this debt was 4.4 percent as of November 30, 2002. Since the Company’s long-term debt under this agreement bears interest at market rates, the carrying value approximates fair value.

The Company is subject to foreign currency exchange risk primarily due to the European wallcovering business. As disclosed in the Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity, the Company has experienced an accumulated loss of $4.9 million as of November 30, 2002 primarily due to the unfavorable currency conversion of the British pound sterling. To date, the Company has not entered into any significant foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, but will continue to evaluate the future use of these financial instruments.

Item 8.    Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

23

Table of Contents

REPORT OF MANAGEMENT

To the Shareholders of OMNOVA Solutions Inc.:

Management of OMNOVA Solutions Inc. is responsible for preparing the accompanying consolidated financial statements and for assuring their integrity and objectivity. These financial statements were prepared in accordance with standards generally accepted in the United States and fairly represent the transactions and financial condition of the Company in all material respects. The financial statements include amounts that are based on management’s best estimates and judgments. The Company’s financial statements have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors, who have been selected by the Board of Directors and approved by the shareholders. Management has made available to Ernst & Young LLP all of the Company’s financial records and related data, internal audit reports, as well as the minutes of shareholders’ and directors’ meetings.

Management of the Company has established and maintains a system of internal accounting controls that is designed to provide reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded, transactions are properly recorded and executed in accordance with management’s authorization and the books and records accurately reflect the disposition of assets. The system of internal controls includes appropriate division of responsibility. The Company maintains an internal audit department that independently assesses the effectiveness of the internal controls through a program of internal audits.

The Audit Committee is composed of directors who are not officers or employees of the Company. It meets regularly with members of management, the internal auditors and the independent auditors to discuss the adequacy of the Company’s internal controls, financial statements and the nature, extent and results of the audit effort. Management reviews with the Audit Committee all of the Company’s significant accounting policies and assumptions affecting the results of operations. Both the independent and internal auditors have free and direct access to the Audit Committee without the presence of management.

Kevin M. McMullen

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Michael E. Hicks

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Treasurer

February 3, 2003

24

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of OMNOVA Solutions Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of OMNOVA Solutions Inc. as of November 30, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended November 30, 2002. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of OMNOVA Solutions Inc. at November 30, 2002 and 2001, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended November 30, 2002, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

As discussed in Note C to the financial statements, effective December 1, 2001, the Company changed its method of accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets.

Akron, Ohio

February 3, 2003

25

Table of Contents

OMNOVA SOLUTIONS INC.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

26

Table of Contents

OMNOVA SOLUTIONS INC.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

27

Table of Contents

OMNOVA SOLUTIONS INC.

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Loss

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

28