Back to GetFilings.com



Table of Contents

 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 

 
FORM 10-Q
 

 
x
 
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002
 
OR
 
¨
 
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
Commission File Number: 000-25375
 

 
VIGNETTE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
Delaware
    
74-2769415
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
    
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 
1601 South MoPac Expressway
Austin, Texas 78746
(Address of principal executive offices)
 

 
(512) 741-4300
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 

 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days
 
(1)  Yes  x    No  ¨
(2)  Yes  x    No  ¨
 
As of October 31, 2002, there were 250,558,406 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.


Table of Contents
 
VIGNETTE CORPORATION
FORM 10–Q QUARTERLY REPORT
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
             
Page

Part I.    Financial Information
    
   
Item 1.
  
Financial Statements
    
           
2
           
3
           
4
           
5
   
Item 2.
     
13
   
Item 3.
     
37
   
Item 4.
     
38
Part II.    Other Information
    
   
Item 1.
     
39
   
Item 6.
     
40
  
41
  
42


Table of Contents
 
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
ITEM 1 — FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
VIGNETTE CORPORATION
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
in thousands
 
    
September 30,
2002

  
December 31, 2001

    
(Unaudited)
    
ASSETS
             
Current assets:
             
Cash and cash equivalents
  
$
225,237
  
$
348,916
Short-term investments
  
 
109,774
  
 
42,716
Accounts receivable, net
  
 
25,635
  
 
35,477
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
  
 
5,409
  
 
4,720
    

  

Total current assets
  
 
366,055
  
 
431,829
Property and equipment, net
  
 
25,009
  
 
43,475
Investments
  
 
14,610
  
 
22,414
Goodwill, net
  
 
146,830
  
 
144,420
Other intangibles, net
  
 
802
  
 
18,791
Other assets
  
 
2,623
  
 
2,097
    

  

Total assets
  
$
555,929
  
$
663,026
    

  

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
             
Current liabilities:
             
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
  
$
60,898
  
$
73,456
Deferred revenue
  
 
38,895
  
 
46,051
Current portion of capital lease obligation
  
 
326
  
 
750
Other current liabilities
  
 
5,073
  
 
5,746
    

  

Total current liabilities
  
 
105,192
  
 
126,003
Long-term liabilities, less current portion
  
 
24,785
  
 
26,722
    

  

Total liabilities
  
 
129,977
  
 
152,725
Stockholders’ equity
  
 
425,952
  
 
510,301
    

  

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  
$
555,929
  
$
663,026
    

  

 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

2


Table of Contents
 
VIGNETTE CORPORATION
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
in thousands, except per share data
 
    
Three Months Ended
September 30,

    
Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 
    
2002

    
2001

    
2002

    
2001

 
Revenue:
                                   
Product license
  
$
11,354
 
  
$
40,276
 
  
$
44,455
 
  
$
132,809
 
Services
  
 
21,362
 
  
 
30,220
 
  
 
70,289
 
  
 
111,437
 
    


  


  


  


Total revenue
  
 
32,716
 
  
 
70,496
 
  
 
114,744
 
  
 
244,246
 
Cost of revenue:
                                   
Product license
  
 
394
 
  
 
1,639
 
  
 
1,706
 
  
 
4,251
 
Services (1)
  
 
9,701
 
  
 
17,021
 
  
 
33,728
 
  
 
64,476
 
    


  


  


  


Total cost of revenue
  
 
10,095
 
  
 
18,660
 
  
 
35,434
 
  
 
68,727
 
    


  


  


  


Gross profit
  
 
22,621
 
  
 
51,836
 
  
 
79,310
 
  
 
175,519
 
Operating expenses:
                                   
Research and development (1)
  
 
11,757
 
  
 
15,570
 
  
 
38,657
 
  
 
51,021
 
Sales and marketing (1)
  
 
16,681
 
  
 
44,867
 
  
 
64,457
 
  
 
147,656
 
General and administrative (1)
  
 
5,107
 
  
 
6,932
 
  
 
16,968
 
  
 
23,004
 
Acquisition-related and other charges
  
 
—  
 
  
 
578
 
  
 
—  
 
  
 
1,919
 
Business restructuring charges
  
 
18,064
 
  
 
—  
 
  
 
31,872
 
  
 
90,658
 
Amortization of deferred stock compensation
  
 
137
 
  
 
1,731
 
  
 
1,210
 
  
 
8,533
 
Amortization of goodwill and other intangibles
  
 
334
 
  
 
125,530
 
  
 
15,579
 
  
 
376,504
 
    


  


  


  


Total operating expenses
  
 
52,080
 
  
 
195,208
 
  
 
168,743
 
  
 
699,295
 
    


  


  


  


Loss from operations
  
 
(29,459
)
  
 
(143,372
)
  
 
(89,433
)
  
 
(523,776
)
Other income (expense), net
  
 
(4,676
)
  
 
(4,248
)
  
 
(1,938
)
  
 
(35,900
)
    


  


  


  


Loss before provision for income taxes
  
 
(34,135
)
  
 
(147,620
)
  
 
(91,371
)
  
 
(559,676
)
Provision for income taxes
  
 
70
 
  
 
297
 
  
 
692
 
  
 
1,375
 
    


  


  


  


Net loss
  
$
(34,205
)
  
$
(147,917
)
  
$
(92,063
)
  
$
(561,051
)
    


  


  


  


Basic net loss per common share
  
$
(0.14
)
  
$
(0.61
)
  
$
(0.37
)
  
$
(2.33
)
    


  


  


  


Shares used in computing basic net loss per common share
  
 
250,112
 
  
 
243,930
 
  
 
248,741
 
  
 
240,895
 

(1)
 
Excludes amortization of deferred stock compensation as follows:
 
    
Three Months Ended
September 30,

  
Nine Months Ended
September 30,

    
2002

  
2001

  
2002

  
2001

Cost of revenue—services
  
$
18
  
$
527
  
$
163
  
$
1,936
Research and development
  
 
62
  
 
496
  
 
372
  
 
2,255
Sales and marketing
  
 
40
  
 
576
  
 
390
  
 
3,127
General and administrative
  
 
17
  
 
132
  
 
285
  
 
1,215
    

  

  

  

    
$
137
  
$
1,731
  
$
1,210
  
$
8,533
    

  

  

  

 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

3


Table of Contents
 
VIGNETTE CORPORATION
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
in thousands
 
    
Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 
    
2002

    
2001

 
Operating activities:
                 
Net loss
  
$
(92,063
)
  
$
(561,051
)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
                 
Depreciation
  
 
14,660
 
  
 
15,936
 
Noncash compensation expense
  
 
1,210
 
  
 
8,533
 
Amortization of goodwill and other intangibles
  
 
15,579
 
  
 
377,033
 
Acquisition-related and other charges (noncash)
  
 
—  
 
  
 
207
 
Noncash restructuring expense
  
 
7,514
 
  
 
24,649
 
Noncash investment impairments
  
 
6,496
 
  
 
49,063
 
Loss on disposal of fixed assets
  
 
777
 
  
 
—  
 
Other noncash items
  
 
(156
)
  
 
167
 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
  
 
(14,025
)
  
 
49,340
 
    


  


Net cash used in operating activities
  
 
(60,008
)
  
 
(36,123
)
Investing activities:
                 
Purchase of property and equipment
  
 
(4,044
)
  
 
(17,521
)
Maturity (purchase) of short-term investments, net
  
 
(67,058
)
  
 
3,740
 
Maturity of restricted investments
  
 
1,148
 
  
 
1,018
 
Purchase of equity securities
  
 
(1,067
)
  
 
(555
)
Other
  
 
(158
)
  
 
(743
)
    


  


Net cash used in investing activities
  
 
(71,179
)
  
 
(14,061
)
Financing activities:
                 
Payments on capital lease obligations
  
 
(664
)
  
 
(632
)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and purchase of employee stock purchase plan shares
  
 
6,090
 
  
 
15,816
 
Proceeds from repayment of shareholder notes receivable
  
 
—  
 
  
 
825
 
Payments for unvested common stock
  
 
(29
)
  
 
(254
)
Purchase of Company common stock
  
 
—  
 
  
 
(5,450
)
    


  


Net cash provided by financing activities
  
 
5,397
 
  
 
10,305
 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
  
 
2,111
 
  
 
(2,354
)
    


  


Net change in cash and cash equivalents
  
 
(123,679
)
  
 
(42,233
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
  
 
348,916
 
  
 
435,481
 
    


  


Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  
$
225,237
 
  
$
393,248
 
    


  


 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4


Table of Contents
 
VIGNETTE CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
September 30, 2002
 
NOTE 1 — General and Basis of Financial Statements
 
The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Vignette Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company” or “Vignette”). All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
 
The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and are presented in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission applicable to interim financial information. Accordingly, certain footnote disclosures have been condensed or omitted. In the Company’s opinion, the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001. The results of operations for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the full fiscal year.
 
The balance sheet at December 31, 2001 has been derived from audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates, and such differences could be material to the financial statements.
 
NOTE 2 — Accounting Reclassification and Change in Accounting Estimate
 
Effective December 31, 2001, the Company reports all bad debt expense in the operating expense cost category, “Sales and marketing”. Prior to December 31, 2001, the Company reported a portion of bad debt expense in “Cost of revenue – services”. Bad debt expense reported in “Cost of revenue – services” for the prior periods presented in this Report have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. Such reclassification had no impact on the reported net loss, net loss per share or stockholders’ equity. Bad debt expense reclassified from “Cost of revenue – services” to “Sales and marketing” was $484,000 and $4.6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2001, respectively. The effect of this reclassification for the prior three and nine month periods was to increase gross margin by approximately 1% and 2%, respectively, and to increase “Sales and marketing” as a percentage of sales by a comparable amount.

5


Table of Contents

VIGNETTE CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 
The Company periodically reviews the valuation and amortization of its identifiable intangible assets, taking into consideration any events or circumstances that might result in a diminished fair value or useful life. During the quarter ended March 31, 2002, the Company changed the estimated useful life of technologies purchased as part of the July 2000 acquisition of OnDisplay, Inc. Due to changes in product architecture and anticipated future product offerings, the estimated life of such acquired technology was reduced from four years to two years. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002, this change in estimated useful life resulted in a decrease in net loss of $1.3 million and an increase in net loss of $9.3 million, respectively, and a decrease in basic net loss per share of $0.01 and an increase in basic net loss per share of $0.04 per share, respectively.
 
NOTE 3 — Net Loss Per Share
 
The Company follows the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, Earnings Per Share. Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, excluding shares subject to repurchase. Diluted net loss per share has not been presented, as the effect of the assumed exercise of stock options, warrants, unvested restricted shares and contingently issued shares is antidilutive due to the Company’s net loss position.
 
NOTE 4 — Comprehensive Loss
 
The Company’s comprehensive loss is composed of net loss, foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized gains and losses on investments designated as available-for-sale. The following table presents the calculation of comprehensive loss (in thousands):
 
    
Three Months Ended
September 30,

    
Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 
    
2002

    
2001

    
2002

    
2001

 
Net loss
  
$
(34,205
)
  
$
(147,917
)
  
$
(92,063
)
  
$
(561,051
)
Foreign currency translation adjustments
  
 
(142
)
  
 
1,719
 
  
 
1,609
 
  
 
(1,555
)
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments
  
 
1,630
 
  
 
518
 
  
 
(1,261
)
  
 
(12,258
)
    


  


  


  


Total comprehensive loss
  
$
(32,717
)
  
$
(145,680
)
  
$
(91,715
)
  
$
(574,864
)
    


  


  


  


 
NOTE 5 — Long-Term Investments
 
At September 30, 2002, the Company’s long-term investments consisted of common stock held in publicly-traded technology companies and a limited partnership interest in a technology incubator. The Company’s investments in redeemable convertible preferred stock of privately-held technology companies were fully impaired as of September 30, 2002. The Company periodically analyzes its long-term investments for impairments considered other than temporary. In performing this analysis, the Company evaluates whether general market conditions which reflect prospects for the economy as a whole, or information pertaining to the specific investment’s industry or that individual company, indicates that an other than temporary decline in value has occurred. If so, the Company considers specific factors, including the financial condition and near-term prospects of each investment, any specific events that may affect the investee company, and the intent and ability of the Company to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value. As a result of such review, the Company recognized impairment charges in the following periods (in thousands):
 
    
Three Months Ended
September 30,

    
Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 
    
2002

    
2001

    
2002

    
2001

 
Long-term investment impairment
  
$
(6,038
)
  
$
(7,666
)
  
$
(6,496
)
  
$
(49,063
)
 
Such impairments are recorded in “Other income (expense), net” on the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

6


Table of Contents

VIGNETTE CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 
NOTE 6 — Intangible Assets
 
In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“Statement 142”). Statement 142 requires that ratable amortization of intangible assets with indefinite lives, including goodwill, be replaced with periodic review and analysis of such intangible assets for possible impairment. Intangible assets with definite lives must be amortized over their estimated useful lives. On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted Statement 142. As a result, the Company no longer amortizes goodwill, acquired workforce or its acquired trademark, thereby eliminating estimated amortization of approximately $16.9 million and $53.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002, respectively.
 
As required by Statement 142, prior period results are not restated. The following presents the Company’s reported net loss and loss per share, as adjusted for the exclusion of goodwill, workforce and trademark amortization (in thousands, except per share information):
 
    
Three Months Ended
September 30,

    
Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 
    
2002

    
2001

    
2002

    
2001

 
Net loss:
                                   
As reported
  
$
(34,205
)
  
$
(147,917
)
  
$
(92,063
)
  
$
(561,051
)
Add: amortization expense – goodwill, acquired workforce and trademark
  
 
—  
 
  
 
123,103
 
  
 
—  
 
  
 
369,231
 
    


  


  


  


Adjusted net loss
  
$
(34,205
)
  
$
(24,814
)
  
$
(92,063
)
  
$
(191,820
)
    


  


  


  


Basic net loss per common share:
                                   
As reported
  
$
(0.14
)
  
$
(0.61
)
  
$
(0.37
)
  
$
(2.33
)
Add: amortization expense – goodwill, acquired workforce and trademark
  
 
—  
 
  
 
0.50
 
  
 
—  
 
  
 
1.53
 
    


  


  


  


Adjusted net loss per share – basic
  
$
(0.14
)
  
$
(0.11
)
  
$
(0.37
)
  
$
(0.80
)
    


  


  


  


 
Goodwill impairment tests
 
Within six months of adopting Statement 142, the Company performed the required transitional impairment test and determined that it did not have a transitional impairment of goodwill as of January 1, 2002. The Company has one reporting unit for evaluation purposes.
 
Subsequent to the transitional impairment test, the Company must assess goodwill for impairment at least annually. The Company will assess its goodwill on October 1 of each year and during an interim period if facts or circumstances would more likely than not suggest that the fair value of its identified reporting unit is below its carrying value. The Company is currently completing an annual assessment of goodwill to determine the likelihood of impairment. The value determined in Step 1 of the assessment, which involves comparing the fair value to the carrying value of the reporting unit, is based on a measurement date of October 1, 2002 and indicates a goodwill impairment. The Company will measure the impairment loss by completing Step 2 during the fourth quarter of 2002. Step 2 involves determining the enterprise’s implied fair value of goodwill. If the carrying amount of the enterprise’s goodwill is greater than the implied fair value of its goodwill, an impairment loss must be recognized for the excess of such amount. Such assessment of goodwill will result in a significant goodwill impairment charge during the fourth quarter of 2002. The Company will report the charge as “Impairment of goodwill,” a component of its operating expenses.

7


Table of Contents

VIGNETTE CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Intangible assets with indefinite lives
 
The following table presents the Company’s indefinite-lived intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization and impairment charges (in thousands):
 
    
September 30,
2002

  
December 31, 2001

Goodwill
  
$
146,830
  
$
144,420
Trademark
  
 
301
  
 
301
    

  

Total intangible assets – indefinite-lived, net
  
$
147,131
  
$
144,721
    

  

 
Workforce no longer meets the definition of a separately-identified intangible asset under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, Business Combinations. As such, during the first quarter of 2002, the Company reclassified acquired workforce of $2.4 million, net of accumulated amortization and impairment charges, to goodwill.
 
Intangible assets with definite lives
 
Acquired technology is the Company’s only intangible asset subject to amortization under Statement 142. At September 30, 2002, acquired technology of $501,000, net of accumulated amortization and impairment charges of $35.6 million, is being amortized over its estimated useful life, ranging from two to three years. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002, the Company recorded $334,000 and $15.6 million, respectively, in amortization expense related to its acquired technology. Such expense is recorded in “Amortization of intangibles” on the condensed consolidated statements of operations. Estimated annual amortization expense for fiscal years 2002 and 2003 is $15.9 million and $167,000, respectively and $0, thereafter.
 
Effective January 1, 2002, the estimated life of technology acquired from OnDisplay, Inc. was reduced from four years to two years. Such revision resulted from changes in the Company’s product architecture and anticipated future product offerings. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002, this change in estimated useful life resulted in a decrease in net loss of $1.3 million and an increase in net loss of $9.3 million, respectively, and a decrease in basic net loss per share of $0.01 and an increase in basic net loss per share of $0.04 per share, respectively.
 
NOTE 7 — Business Restructuring
 
During fiscal year 2001, the Company’s management approved a restructuring plan to reduce headcount and infrastructure and to consolidate operations. The Company expanded the restructuring plan during 2002. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002, the Company recorded $18.1 million and $31.9 million in restructuring charges, respectively. Components of business restructuring charges and the remaining restructuring accruals as of September 30, 2002 are as follows (in thousands):

8


Table of Contents

VIGNETTE CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 
    
Facility Lease Commitments

    
Asset Impairments

    
Employee Separation and Other Costs

    
Total

 
Balance at December 31, 2001
  
$
42,461
 
  
$
—  
 
  
$
7,411
 
  
$
49,872
 
Effect of expanded restructuring plan and adjustment to accrual
  
 
8,417
 
  
 
803
 
  
 
4,588
 
  
 
13,808
 
Cash activity
  
 
(3,558
)
  
 
—  
 
  
 
(2,386
)
  
 
(5,944
)
Non-cash activity
  
 
—  
 
  
 
(803
)
  
 
—  
 
  
 
(803
)
    


  


  


  


Balance at March 31, 2002
  
 
47,320
 
  
 
—  
 
  
 
9,613
 
  
 
56,933
 
Adjustment to accrual
  
 
82
 
  
 
463
 
  
 
(545
)
  
 
—  
 
Cash activity
  
 
(3,646
)
  
 
—  
 
  
 
(3,711
)
  
 
(7,357
)
Non-cash activity
  
 
—  
 
  
 
(463
)
  
 
—  
 
  
 
(463
)
    


  


  


  


Balance at June 30, 2002
  
$
43,756
 
  
$
—  
 
  
$
5,357
 
  
$
49,113
 
Effect of expanded restructuring plan and adjustment to accrual
  
 
6,032
 
  
 
6,675
 
  
 
5,357
 
  
 
18,064
 
Cash activity
  
 
(3,471
)
  
 
—  
 
  
 
(4,365
)
  
 
(7,836
)
Non-cash activity
  
 
—  
 
  
 
(6,675
)
  
 
(36
)
  
 
(6,711
)
    


  


  


  


Balance at September 30, 2002
  
$
46,317
 
  
$
—  
 
  
$
6,313
 
  
$
52,630
 
    


  


  


  


 
At September 30, 2002, remaining cash expenditures resulting from the restructuring are estimated to be $52.6 million and relate primarily to facility lease commitments. Excluding facilities lease commitments, the Company estimates that these costs will be substantially incurred within one year of the restructuring. The Company has substantially implemented its restructuring efforts initiated in conjunction with the restructuring announcements made during 2001 and the nine months ended September 30, 2002; however, there can be no assurance that the estimated costs of the Company’s restructuring efforts will not change.
 
Consolidation of Excess Facilities
 
Facility lease commitments relate to lease obligations for excess office space that the Company has vacated or intends to vacate as a result of the restructuring plan. The Company recorded $6.0 million and $14.5 million in restructuring expense in relation to site consolidations during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002. Total lease commitments include the remaining lease liabilities and brokerage commissions, offset by estimated sublease income. The estimated costs of vacating these leased facilities, including estimated costs to sublease and any resulting sublease income, were based on market information and trend analysis as estimated by the Company. It is reasonably possible that actual results could differ from these estimates in the near term, and such differences could be material to the financial statements. In particular, actual sublease income attributable to the consolidation of excess facilities might deviate from the assumptions used to calculate the Company’s accrual for facility lease commitments. Of the $14.5 million charge recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2002, approximately $9.0 million relates to adjustments in lease assumptions. The remaining $5.5 million relates to additional space consolidation in Austin, Texas; Reston, Virginia; San Ramon, California; Waltham, Massachusetts; Maidenhead, United Kingdom; Hamburg, Germany; Madrid, Spain; Sydney and Melbourne, Australia; Hong Kong and Singapore. Facility lease commitments recorded through December 31, 2001 relate to the Company’s departure from certain office space in Austin and Houston, Texas; Redwood City, Los Angeles and San Ramon, California; Boston, Waltham; Reading and Cambridge, Massachusetts; New York, New York; Paris, France; Hamburg, Germany; Madrid, Spain; Sydney, Australia; Bangalore and Guragon, India and Singapore. The maximum lease commitment of such vacated properties is 10 years.
 
Asset Impairments
 
Asset impairments recorded pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, relate to the impairment of certain leasehold improvements and office and computer equipment. These fixed assets were impaired as a result of the Company’s decision to vacate certain office space and align its infrastructure with current and

9


Table of Contents

VIGNETTE CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

projected headcount, resulting in an impairment of $6.7 million and $7.9 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002, respectively.
 
Employee Separation and Other Costs
 
Employee separation and other costs, which include severance, related taxes, outplacement and other benefits, payable to approximately 400 terminated employees, totaled $5.4 million and $9.4 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002, respectively. Employee groups impacted by the restructuring efforts include personnel in positions throughout the sales, marketing, professional services, engineering and general and administrative functions in all geographies.
 
NOTE 8 — Selected Balance Sheet Detail
 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses consisted of the following (in thousands):
 
    
September 30,
2002

  
December 31, 2001

Accounts payable
  
$
3,658
  
$
8,967
Accrued employee liabilities
  
 
12,429
  
 
22,896
Accrued restructuring charges
  
 
27,845
  
 
23,390
Accrued other charges
  
 
16,966
  
 
18,203
    

  

    
$
60,898
  
$
73,456
    

  

 
Long-term liabilities, less current portion consisted of the following (in thousands):
 
    
September 30,
2002

  
December 31, 2001

Accrued restructuring charges, less current portion
  
$
24,785
  
$
26,482
Capital lease obligation, less current portion
  
 
—  
  
 
240
    

  

    
$
24,785
  
$
26,722
    

  

 
NOTE 9 — Legal Matters
 
On October 26, 2001, a class action lawsuit was filed against the Company and certain of its current and former officers and directors in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in an action captioned Leon Leybovich v. Vignette Corporation, et al., seeking unspecified damages on behalf of a purported class that purchased Vignette common stock between February 18, 1999 and December 6, 2000. Also named as defendants were four underwriters involved in the Company’s initial public offering of Vignette stock in February 1999 and the Company’s secondary public offering of Vignette stock in December 1999 – Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, Inc., Hambrecht & Quist, LLC, Dain Rauscher Wessels and U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray, Inc. The complaint alleges violations of Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, based on, among other things, claims that the four underwriters awarded material portions of the shares in the Company’s initial and secondary public offerings to certain customers in exchange for excessive commissions. The plaintiff also asserts that the underwriters engaged in “tie-in arrangements” whereby certain customers were allocated shares of Company stock sold in its initial and secondary public offerings in exchange for an agreement to purchase additional shares in the aftermarket at pre-determined prices. With respect to the Company, the complaint alleges that the Company and its officers and directors failed to disclose the existence of these purported excessive commissions and tie-in arrangements in the prospectus and registration statement for the Company’s initial public offering and the prospectus and registration statement for the Company’s secondary public offering. The Company believes that this lawsuit is without merit and intends to defend itself vigorously.
 
The Company is also subject to various legal proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company’s management does not expect that the outcome in any of these legal proceedings,

10


Table of Contents

VIGNETTE CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

individually or collectively, will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
 
NOTE 10 — Capital Structure
 
On April 24, 2002, the Company’s Board of Directors approved, adopted and entered into, a shareholder rights plan. The plan is similar to plans adopted by many other companies, and was not adopted in response to any attempt to acquire the Company, nor was the Company aware of any such efforts at the time of adoption.
 
The plan is designed to enable the Company’s stockholders to realize the full value of their investment by providing for fair and equal treatment of all stockholders in the event that an unsolicited attempt is made to acquire the company. Adoption of the shareholder rights plan is intended to guard shareholders against abusive and coercive takeover tactics.
 
Under the shareholder rights plan, stockholders of record as of the close of business on May 6, 2002, received one right to purchase a one one-thousandth of a share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, par $0.01 per share, at a price of $30.00 per one one-thousandth, subject to adjustment. The rights were issued as a non-taxable dividend and will expire 10 years from the date of the adoption of the rights plan, unless earlier redeemed or exchanged. The rights are not immediately exercisable; however, they will become exercisable upon the earlier to occur of (i) the close of business on the tenth day after a public announcement that a person or group has acquired beneficial ownership of 15 percent or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock or (ii) the close of business on the tenth day (or such later date as may be determined by the Board of Directors prior to such time as any person becomes an acquiring person) following the commencement of, or announcement of an intention to make, a tender offer or exchange offer that would result in the beneficial ownership by a person or group of 15 percent or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock. If a person or group acquires 15 percent or more of the Company’s common stock, then all rights holders except the acquirer will be entitled to acquire the Company’s common stock at a significant discount. The intended effect will be to discourage acquisitions of 15 percent or more of the Company’s common stock without negotiation with the Board of Directors.
 
NOTE 11 — Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
In November 2001, the FASB issued staff announcement Topic No. D-103, “Income Statement Characterization of Reimbursements Received for ‘Out-of-Pocket’ Expenses Incurred,” which was subsequently incorporated in Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 01-14 (“EITF Issue No. 01-14”). EITF Issue No. 01-14 requires companies to characterize reimbursements received for out-of-pocket expenses as revenues in the statement of operations. EITF Issue No. 01-14 did not have a significant effect on total services revenues or the services gross margin percentages and has no effect on net income (loss) as it increases both services revenues and cost of services. Because reimbursements received for out-of-pocket expenses were not significant for the respective three or nine months ended September 30, 2001, the condensed consolidated statement of operations for such periods have not been restated.
 
In June 2002, the FASB issued Statement No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (“Statement 146”). Statement 146 addresses accounting for restructuring costs and supersedes previous accounting guidance, principally EITF Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)” (“EITF Issue No. 94-3”). Statement 146 requires that the liability associated with exit or disposal activities be recognized when the liability is incurred. As a contrast under EITF Issue 94-3, a liability for an exit cost is recognized when a Company commits to an exit plan. Statement 146 also establishes that a liability should initially be measured and recorded at fair value. Accordingly, Statement 146 may affect the timing and amount of recognizing restructuring costs. The Company will adopt the provisions of Statement 146 for any restructuring activities initiated after December 31, 2002.

11


Table of Contents

VIGNETTE CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

NOTE 12 — Subsequent Events
 
On October 14, 2002, the Company received a notice from the Nasdaq Qualifications Department. Such notice indicated that the Company’s common stock had closed for 30 consecutive trading days below the applicable minimum bid price of $1.00. In this instance, the Nasdaq affords a company 90 calendar days in which to demonstrate compliance with National Market Marketplace Rules; specifically, a company’s common stock must close at or above a bid price of $1.00 per share for a minimum of ten consecutive trading. On November 13, 2002, the Company’s stock closed at or above a bid price of $1.00 per share for the tenth consecutive trading day, demonstrating compliance with the National Market Marketplace Rules. To ensure continued listing on the Nasdaq National Market, the Company must maintain compliance with the minimum bid price requirements and other requirements.
 
On October 15, 2002, the Company terminated the majority of a significant office lease commitment. Such lease space was vacated as a result of the Company’s restructuring activities that the Company initiated in 2001 and subsequently expanded during 2002. The termination resulted in a $7.2 million cash payment that will reduce the restructuring accrual during the fourth quarter of 2002.
 
On October 29, 2002, the Company entered into a definitive agreement with Athens Acquisition Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Vignette Corporation, Epicentric, Inc. (“Epicentric”), U.S. Bank, N.A., as Escrow Agent and Carl Nichols, as Shareholders’ Representative. Pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreement, the Company expects to pay $26.0 million in cash for all of the issued and outstanding shares of Epicentric. In addition, the Company expects to pay up to $6.0 million, in cash and restricted stock, in acquisition-related retention payments over the next two years. The Company expects the business combination will be completed in December 2002.
 
On November 11, 2002, the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program whereby the Company could repurchase up to $20.0 million of its common stock, effective immediately. Any share repurchases under the program may be made over a period of up to six months and may be made in the open market, through block trades or otherwise. Depending on market conditions and other factors, these repurchases may be commenced or suspended at any time or from time-to-time without prior notice.
 

12


Table of Contents
ITEM 2 — MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF                 OPERATIONS
 
The statements contained in this Report on Form 10-Q that are not purely historical statements are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, including statements regarding our expectations, beliefs, hopes, intentions or strategies regarding the future. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those indicated in such forward-looking statements. We are under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this filing on Form 10-Q to conform these statements to actual results. Factors that might cause or contribute to such a difference include, but are not limited to, those discussed elsewhere in this report in the section entitled “Risk Factors That May Affect Future Results” and the risks discussed in our other historical Securities and Exchange Commission filings.
 
Overview
 
Vignette Corporation is a leading provider of content management solutions used by organizations to create and maintain effective online relationships with their customers, employees, business partners and suppliers. Vignette enables organizations to achieve real-time advantage by rapidly building, deploying and optimizing Web-based applications. By putting the right information in front of the right person at the right time, we help Web visitors make informed decisions, and help organizations successfully manage those relationships.
 
Vignette’s technology platform for the Real-Time Enterprise can be broadly described in four categories of application services: integration, information, interaction and management:
 
 
Ÿ
 
Integration capabilities connect to and discover informational assets, regardless of where that information resides—inside or outside the firewall.
 
 
Ÿ
 
Information management fosters full understanding of information assets, and assigns meaning and value to content to provide context.
 
 
Ÿ
 
Interaction management allows the enterprise to filter information and personalize the experience for every user or its Web sites and portals.
 
 
Ÿ
 
Management capabilities provide a single, roles-based console for consistently managing all enterprise Web applications and services delivered over the Web.
 
Our products are supported by our services organization, which offers a broad range of services, including strategic planning, project management, account management, general implementation services, technical support and an extensive array of training offerings, including Vignette ® Velocity Services, a new set of packaged consulting and education services that enable customers to successfully reduce implementation and mitigate client implementation risks.
 
Our business is facilitated by a community of skilled partners specifically selected to support our customers and to ensure their success. This “Vignette Economy” includes a number of partnerships with leading system integrators like Accenture, Deloitte Consulting, EDS, IBM Global Services, Inforte and PricewaterhouseCoopers. It also includes strategic alliances with technology leaders like BEA Systems, IBM and Sun Microsystems.
 
We are headquartered in Austin, Texas, and operate satellite offices in other U.S. cities. In addition, we are located throughout the Americas, Europe, Asia and Australia. We had 827 full-time employees at September 30, 2002. Due in large part to the restructuring plan we implemented in 2001 and subsequently expanded during 2002, headcount decreased 50% from 1,640 at September 30, 2001.
 
Since our inception in December 1995, we have incurred substantial costs to develop our technology and products, market, sell and service these products, recruit and train personnel and build a corporate infrastructure. As a result, we have incurred significant losses since our inception and, as of September 30, 2002, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $2.2 billion. We believe our success depends on the

13


Table of Contents
continued development and acceptance of our products and services, the growth of our customer base as well as the overall growth in the content management applications market. Accordingly, we intend to invest in research and development, sales, marketing, professional services and to a lesser extent our operational and financial systems, as necessary. Furthermore, we expect to continue to incur operating losses in the near future, and we will require increases in revenues before we achieve and sustain profitability; however, we cannot assure that such increases in revenue will result in profitability.
 
Recent Events
 
Industry Recognition    During the third quarter of 2002, we were selected as a top vendor in the content management industry in Forbes’ Best of the Web. Selection criteria included company strategy, execution and product offering. Also during the third quarter, we announced that we have retained our leadership position in Gartner’s Web Content Management Magic Quadrant for 2002.
 
Web Services Interoperability Organization    In July 2002, we joined the Web Services Interoperability Organization (“WS-I”), a cross-industry community, including software vendors, enterprise customers and technology developers. WS-I’s mission is to promote interoperability of Web services across platforms, applications and programming languages. Priorities of WS-I include providing Web services usage scenarios and testing tools to accelerate deployments; grouping key Web services standards into profiles to simplify implementation and promote interoperability; and creating a road map for the long-term evolution of Web services to guide WS-I and standards organizations in achieving Web services interoperability.
 
Appointment of Board Members    In September 2002, Michael D. Lambert joined our Board of Directors. Mr. Lambert has served in senior executive roles at Dell Computer Corp., Compaq Computer Corp. and NCR Corp. In October 2002, Jan H. Lindelow joined our Board of Directors. Mr. Lindelow has served in leadership roles at Tivoli Software, IBM Corp., Asea Brown Boveri Ltd. and Unisys/Sperry Computer Systems. The Board’s committees are composed of the following directors: audit committee - Messrs. Davoli, Hawn and Papermaster; compensation committee - Messrs. Davoli, Lambert and Papermaster; nominating committee - Messrs. Davoli, Lambert and Papermaster; and stock option committee - Mr. Hogan.
 
Announcement of Vignette ® V7    In October 2002, we announced the new family of Vignette V7 content management applications and the Vignette V7 Enterprise Services Foundation, which includes an application architecture and a comprehensive set of application services that enable the rapid deployment of enterprise Web applications. The Vignette V7 content management applications offer a mix of out-of-the-box and configurable capabilities that are designed to reduce the time and effort required to build and maintain Web sites and portals. The new content management applications are packaged to provide customers a range of options to meet departmental through enterprise requirements and will be available by the end of 2002.
 
Acquisition of Epicentric, Inc.    On October 29, 2002, we entered into a definitive agreement with Athens Acquisition Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Vignette Corporation, Epicentric, Inc. (“Epicentric”), U.S. Bank, N.A., as Escrow Agent and Carl Nichols, as Shareholders’ Representative. Pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreement, we expect to pay $26.0 million in cash for all of the issued and outstanding shares of Epicentric. In addition, we expect to pay up to $6.0 million, in cash and restricted stock, in acquisition-related retention payments over the next two years. We expect the business combination will be completed in December 2002.
 
Stock Repurchase Program    On November 11, 2002, the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program whereby we could repurchase up to $20.0 million of our common stock, effective immediately. Any share repurchases under the program may be made over a period of up to six months and may be made in the open market, through block trades or otherwise. Depending on market conditions and other factors, these repurchases may be commenced or suspended at any time or from time-to-time without prior notice.

14


Table of Contents
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
 
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
 
We believe the following represent our critical accounting policies:
 
 
Ÿ
 
Revenue Recognition;
 
Ÿ
 
Estimating the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts;
 
Ÿ
 
Valuation of Investments;
 
Ÿ
 
Estimating Business Restructuring Accruals; and
 
Ÿ
 
Valuation of Goodwill and Identifiable Intangible Assets.
 
Revenue Recognition    Revenue consists of product and service fees. Product fee income is earned through the licensing or right to use our software and from the sale of specific software products. Service fee income is earned through the sale of maintenance and technical support, consulting services and training services.
 
We do not recognize revenue for agreements with rights of return, refundable fees, cancellation rights or acceptance clauses until such rights to return, refund or cancel have expired or acceptance has occurred.
 
We recognize revenue in accordance with Statement of Position (“SOP”) 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, as amended by SOP 98-4 and SOP 98-9, and Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements.
 
Where software licenses are sold with maintenance or other services, we allocate the total fee to the various elements based on the relative fair values of the elements specific to us. We determine the fair value of each element in the arrangement based on vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of fair value. For software licenses with a fixed number of licenses, VSOE of fair value is based upon the price charged when sold separately, which is in accordance with our standard price list. Our standard price list specifies prices applicable to each level of volume purchased and is applicable when the products are sold separately. For software licenses with enterprise-wide usage (unlimited quantities), VSOE of fair value for the license element is not available, and, accordingly, license revenue is recognized using the residual method. Under the residual method, the contract value is first allocated to the undelivered elements (maintenance and service elements) based upon their VSOE of fair value; the remaining contract value, including any discount, is allocated to the delivered element (license element). For consulting and implementation services, VSOE of fair value is based upon the rates charged for these services when sold separately. We generally sell services under time-and-material agreements. For maintenance, VSOE of fair value is based upon either the renewal rate specified in each contract, or the price charged when sold separately. Both the renewal rate and price when sold separately are in accordance with our standard price list. Except when the residual method is used, discounts, if any, are applied proportionately to each element included in the arrangement based on each element’s fair value without regard to the discount.
 
Revenue allocated to product license fees is recognized when persuasive evidence of an agreement exists, delivery of the product has occurred, we have no significant remaining obligations with regard to implementation, and collection of a fixed or determinable fee is probable. We consider all payments outside our normal payment terms, including all amounts due in excess of one year, to not be fixed and determinable, and such amounts are recognized as revenue as they become due. If collectibility is not considered probable, revenue is recognized when the fee is collected. For software arrangements where we

15


Table of Contents
are obligated to perform professional services for implementation, we do not consider delivery to have occurred or customer payment to be probable of collection until no significant obligations with regard to implementation remain. Generally, this would occur when substantially all service work has been completed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the customer’s implementation requirements but may vary depending on factors such as an individual customer’s payment history or order type (e.g., initial versus follow-on).
 
Revenue from perpetual licenses that include unspecified, additional software products is recognized ratably over the term of the arrangement, beginning with the delivery of the first product.
 
Revenue allocated to maintenance and support is recognized ratably over the maintenance term (typically one year).
 
Revenue allocated to training and consulting service elements is recognized as the services are performed. Our consulting services are not essential to the functionality of our products as (1) such services are available from other vendors and (2) we have sufficient experience in providing such services.
 
Deferred revenue includes amounts received from customers in excess of revenue recognized. Accounts receivable includes amounts due from customers for which revenue has been recognized.
 
We follow very specific and detailed guidelines, discussed above, in determining revenues; however, certain judgments and estimates are made and used to determine revenue recognized in any accounting period. Material differences may result in the amount and timing of revenue recognized for any period if different conditions were to prevail. For example, in determining whether collection is probable, we assess our customers’ ability and intent to pay. Our actual experience with respect to collections could differ from our initial assessment if, for instance, unforeseen declines in the overall economy occur and negatively impact our customers’ financial condition.
 
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts    We continuously assess the collectibility of outstanding customer invoices and in doing such, we maintain an allowance for estimated losses resulting from the non-collection of customer receivables. In estimating this allowance, we consider factors such as: historical collection experience, a customer’s current credit-worthiness, customer concentrations, age of the receivable balance, both individually and in the aggregate, and general economic conditions that may affect a customer’s ability to pay. Actual customer collections could differ from our estimates. For example, if the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.
 
Investments    We periodically analyze our long-term investments for impairments considered other than temporary. In performing this analysis, we evaluate whether general market conditions which reflect prospects for the economy as a whole, or information pertaining to the specific investment’s industry or that individual company, indicates that a decline in value that is other than temporary has occurred. If so, we consider specific factors, including the financial condition and near-term prospects of each investment, any specific events that may affect the investee company, and our intent and ability to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value. We record an investment impairment charge in the line item “Other income (expense), net” when we believe an investment has experienced a decline in value that is other than temporary.
 
Future adverse changes in market conditions or poor operating results of underlying investments could result in losses or an inability to recover the carrying value of the investments that may not be reflected in an investment’s current carrying value, thereby possibly requiring an impairment charge in the future.
 
Business Restructuring    We vacated excess leased facilities as a result of the restructuring plan we initiated in 2001 and subsequently expanded in 2002. We recorded an accrual for the remaining lease liabilities of such vacated properties as well as brokerage commissions, partially offset by estimated sublease income. We estimated the costs of these excess leased facilities, including estimated costs to sublease and resulting sublease income, based on market information and trend analysis. Actual results could differ from these estimates. In particular, actual sublease income attributable to the consolidation of

16


Table of Contents
excess facilities might deviate from the assumptions used to calculate our accrual for facility lease commitments.
 
Goodwill and Identifiable Intangible Assets    We adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“Statement 142”) on January 1, 2002. In accordance with Statement 142, we replaced the ratable amortization of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets with a periodic review and analysis of such intangibles for possible impairment. We were required to perform a transitional impairment review which involved a two-step process: Step 1 involves identifying reporting units, determining the fair value of each reporting unit, and determining if the fair value of each reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If necessary, Step 2 is to be completed before the end of the year in which the company adopts the statement. Step 2 measures the impairment charge and is completed if the fair value is less than the carrying value, as determined in Step 1. The completion of this impairment review required management to make complex assumptions and estimates, including but not limited to determining our reporting unit(s), selecting the appropriate methodology to determine the estimated fair value of a reporting unit as well as the actual fair value estimation of each reporting unit. If our estimates were to change, this could result in a materially different impairment conclusion.
 
We performed the required transitional impairment test of goodwill during the first quarter of 2002 and determined that we did not have a transitional impairment of goodwill. Subsequent to the transitional impairment test, we must assess goodwill for impairment at least annually. We assess our goodwill on October 1 of each year and during an interim period if facts or circumstances would more likely than not suggest that the fair value of an identified reporting unit is below its carrying value. Such periodic assessments of goodwill could result in a significant goodwill impairment charge during the period of review.
 
Accounting Reclassification and Change in Accounting Estimate
 
Effective December 31, 2001, we report all bad debt expense in the operating expense cost category, “Sales and marketing”. Prior to December 31, 2001, we reported a portion of bad debt expense in “Cost of revenue – services”. Bad debt expense reported in “Cost of revenue – services” for the prior periods presented in this Report have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. Such reclassification had no impact on the reported net loss, net loss per share or stockholders’ equity. Bad debt expense reclassified from “Cost of revenue – services” to “Sales and marketing” was $484,000 and $4.6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2001, respectively. The effect of this reclassification for the prior three and nine month periods was to increase gross margin by approximately 1% and 2%, respectively, and to increase “Sales and marketing” as a percentage of sales by a comparable amount.
 
We periodically review the valuation and amortization of our identifiable intangible assets, taking into consideration any events or circumstances that might result in a diminished fair value or useful life. During the quarter ended March 31, 2002, we changed the estimated useful life of technologies purchased as part of the July 2000 acquisition of OnDisplay, Inc. Due to changes in product architecture and anticipated future product offerings, the estimated life of such acquired technology was reduced from four years to two years. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002, this change in estimated useful life resulted in a decrease in net loss of $1.3 million and an increase in net loss of $9.3 million, respectively, and a decrease in basic net loss per share of $0.01 and an increase in basic net loss per share of $0.04 per share, respectively.

17


Table of Contents
 
Results of Operations
 
The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the percentage of revenues represented by certain lines in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.
 
    
Three Months Ended
September 30,

    
Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 
    
2002

    
2001

    
2002

    
2001

 
Revenue:
                           
Product license
  
35
%
  
57
%
  
39
%
  
54
%
Services
  
65
 
  
43
 
  
61
 
  
46
 
    

  

  

  

Total revenue
  
100
 
  
100
 
  
100
 
  
100
 
Cost of revenue:
                           
Product license
  
1
 
  
2
 
  
2
 
  
2
 
Services
  
30
 
  
24
 
  
29
 
  
26
 
    

  

  

  

Total cost of revenue
  
31
 
  
26
 
  
31
 
  
28
 
    

  

  

  

Gross profit
  
69
 
  
74
 
  
69
 
  
72
 
Operating expenses:
                           
Research and development
  
36
 
  
22
 
  
34
 
  
21
 
Sales and marketing
  
51
 
  
64
 
  
56
 
  
61
 
General and administrative
  
16
 
  
10
 
  
15
 
  
9
 
Acquisition-related and other charges
  
—  
 
  
1
 
  
—  
 
  
1
 
Business restructuring charges
  
54
 
  
—  
 
  
27
 
  
37
 
Amortization of deferred stock compensation
  
1
 
  
2
 
  
1
 
  
3
 
Amortization of intangibles
  
1
 
  
178
 
  
14
 
  
154
 
    

  

  

  

Total operating expenses
  
159
 
  
277
 
  
147
 
  
286
 
    

  

  

  

Loss from operations
  
(90
)
  
(203
)
  
(78
)
  
(214
)
Other income (expense), net
  
(14
)
  
(6
)
  
(2
)
  
(15
)
    

  

  

  

Loss before provision for income taxes
  
(104
)
  
(209
)
  
(80
)
  
(229
)
Provision for income taxes
  
1
 
  
1
 
  
1
 
  
1
 
    

  

  

  

Net loss
  
(105
)%
  
(210
)%
  
(81
)%
  
(230
)%
    

  

  

  

 
Revenue
 
Total revenue decreased 54% to $32.7 million in the three months ended September 30, 2002 from $70.5 million in the three months ended September 30, 2001. Total revenue decreased 53% to $114.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2002 from $244.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2001. The decrease is attributable primarily to the global economic slowdown that has resulted in a substantial reduction in information technology spending. As a result, we have experienced a longer sales cycle as well as a decrease in both customer orders and average sales price.
 
Product License.    Product license revenue decreased 72% to $11.4 million in the three months ended September 30, 2002 from $40.3 million in the three months ended September 30, 2001, representing 35% and 57% of total revenue, respectively. Product license revenue decreased 67% to $44.5 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2002 from $132.8 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2001, representing 39% and 54% of total revenue, respectively. The decrease is attributable to a slowdown in information technology spending experienced in fiscal year 2001 and continuing through 2002.
 
Services.    Services revenue decreased 29% to $21.4 million in the three months ended September 30, 2002 from $30.2 million in the three months ended September 30, 2001, representing 65% and 43% of total revenue, respectively. Services revenue from professional services fees represented 25% of total revenues in the three months ended September 30, 2002, as compared to 22% in the three months ended September 30, 2001. Services revenue decreased 37% to $70.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2002 from $111.4 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2001, representing 61% and 46% of total revenue, respectively. Services revenue from professional services fees represented 27% of total revenues

18


Table of Contents
in the nine months ended September 30, 2002, as compared to 28% in the nine months ended September 30, 2001. The overall decrease in services revenue resulted primarily from a decrease in professional services revenue, which decreased 48% to $8.2 million from $15.7 million for the comparative quarters and decreased 55% to $30.9 million from $68.9 million for the comparative nine-month periods. The decrease in professional services revenue resulted primarily from a decrease in new product engagements combined with lower billing rates, as well as a transition of consulting and implementation engagements to our partners and other third parties.
 
Cost of Revenue
 
Cost of revenue consists of costs to manufacture, package and distribute our products and related documentation, the costs of licensing third-party software incorporated into our products, and personnel and other expenses related to providing maintenance and professional services.
 
Product License.    Product license costs decreased 76% to $394,000 in the three months ended September 30, 2002 from $1.6 million in the three months ended September 30, 2001, representing 3% and 4% of product license revenue, respectively. Product license costs decreased 60% to $1.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2002 from $4.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2001, representing 4% and 3% of product license revenue, respectively. The decrease in absolute dollars is due to the decline in product license revenue.
 
Services.    Services costs include salaries, third-party contractor expenses and other related costs for professional service, maintenance and customer support staffs. Services costs decreased 43% to $9.7 million in the three months ended September 30, 2002 from $17.0 million in the three months ended September 30, 2001, representing 45% and 56% of services revenue, respectively. Services costs decreased 48% to $33.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2002 from $64.5 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2001, representing 48% and 58% of services revenue, respectively. The decrease in absolute dollars for the comparative three and nine-month periods relates primarily to restructuring efforts and other cost-savings measures.
 
Professional services-related costs decreased 47% to $8.0 million in the three months ended September 30, 2002 from $15.1 million in the three months ended September 30, 2001, representing 98% and 96% of professional services revenue, respectively. Professional services-related costs decreased 52% to $28.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2002 from $59.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2001, representing 93% and 86% of professional services revenue, respectively. Maintenance and support-related costs decreased 13% to $1.7 million in the three months ended September 30, 2002 from $2.0 million in the three months ended September 30, 2001, representing 13% and 14% of maintenance and support-related revenue, respectively. Maintenance and support-related costs increased 3% to $5.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2002 from $4.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2001, representing 13% and 12% of maintenance and support-related revenue, respectively.
 
Operating Expenses
 
Research and Development.    Research and development expenses consist primarily of personnel costs to support product development. Research and development expenses decreased 24% to $11.8 million in the three months ended September 30, 2002 from $15.6 million in the three months ended September 30, 2001, representing 36% and 22% of total revenue, respectively. Research and development expenses decreased 24% to $38.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2002 from $51.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2001, representing 34% and 21% of total revenue, respectively. The decrease in absolute dollars relates primarily to a reduction in engineering headcount as well as other cost-saving measures resulting from our restructuring plan. The increase as a percentage of total revenue resulted from a decrease in total revenue between the comparative three and nine-month periods.
 
Software development costs that were eligible for capitalization in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 86, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to Be Sold, Leased, or

19


Table of Contents
Otherwise Marketed, were insignificant during the periods presented. Accordingly, such development costs have been expensed in the period incurred.
 
Sales and Marketing.    Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries and other related costs for sales, marketing and customer care personnel, sales commissions, public relations, marketing materials and tradeshows as well as bad debt charges. Sales and marketing expenses decreased 63% to $16.7 million in the three months ended September 30, 2002 from $44.9 million in the three months ended September 30, 2001, representing 51% and 64% of total revenue, respectively. Sales and marketing expenses decreased 56% to $64.5 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2002 from $147.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2001, representing 56% and 61% of total revenue, respectively. The decrease in absolute dollars and as a percentage of total revenues relates primarily to a reduction in sales and marketing headcount, cost-saving measures resulting from our restructuring plan and decreased commissions earned on lower product sales. Also during the first quarter of 2001, we recorded $8.2 million in bad debt charges that were related to the unfavorable financial impacts the economic downturn had on many of our early-stage customers.
 
General and Administrative.    General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and other related costs for human resources, finance, accounting, facilities, information technology and legal employees. General and administrative expenses decreased 26% to $5.1 million in the three months ended September 30, 2002 from $6.9 million in the three months ended September 30, 2001, representing 16% and 10% of total revenue, respectively. General and administrative expenses decreased 26% to $17.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2002 from $23.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2001, representing 15% and 9% of total revenue, respectively. The decrease in absolute dollars relates primarily to a reduction in general and administrative headcount as well as other cost-saving measures resulting from our restructuring plan. The increase as a percentage of total revenue resulted from a decrease in total revenue between the comparative periods.
 
Acquisition-Related and Other Charges.    These charges, which relate primarily to our business combinations, decreased 100% to $0 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002, respectively, from $578,000 and $1.9 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2001, respectively. For both comparative periods, these charges represented 0% and 1% of total revenue during 2002 and 2001, respectively. The acquisition-related charges recorded during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2001 related to contingent consideration paid to certain Engine 5, Ltd. legacy individuals who successfully completed pre-defined future employment requirements. We acquired Engine 5, Ltd. in January 2000 for their Java-server technology.
 
Business Restructuring Charges.    During fiscal year 2001, we approved a restructuring plan to reduce headcount and infrastructure and to consolidate operations. We expanded the restructuring plan during 2002. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002, we recorded $18.1 million and $31.9 million in restructuring charges, respectively. Components of business restructuring charges and the remaining restructuring accruals as of September 30, 2002 are as follows (in thousands):

20


Table of Contents
 
    
Facility Lease Commitments

    
Asset Impairments

    
Employee Separation and Other Costs

    
Total

 
Balance at December 31, 2001
  
$
42,461
 
  
$
—  
 
  
$
7,411
 
  
$
49,872
 
Effect of expanded restructuring plan and adjustment to accrual
  
 
8,417
 
  
 
803
 
  
 
4,588
 
  
 
13,808
 
Cash activity
  
 
(3,558
)
  
 
—  
 
  
 
(2,386
)
  
 
(5,944
)
Non-cash activity
  
 
—  
 
  
 
(803
)
  
 
—  
 
  
 
(803
)
    


  


  


  


Balance at March 31, 2002
  
 
47,320
 
  
 
—  
 
  
 
9,613
 
  
 
56,933
 
Adjustment to accrual
  
 
82
 
  
 
463
 
  
 
(545
)
  
 
—  
 
Cash activity
  
 
(3,646
)
  
 
—  
 
  
 
(3,711
)
  
 
(7,357
)
Non-cash activity
  
 
—  
 
  
 
(463
)
  
 
—  
 
  
 
(463
)
    


  


  


  


Balance at June 30, 2002
  
$
43,756
 
  
$
—  
 
  
$
5,357
 
  
$
49,113
 
Effect of expanded restructuring plan and adjustment to accrual
  
 
6,032
 
  
 
6,675
 
  
 
5,357
 
  
 
18,064
 
Cash activity
  
 
(3,471
)
  
 
—  
 
  
 
(4,365
)
  
 
(7,836
)
Non-cash activity
  
 
—  
 
  
 
(6,675
)
  
 
(36
)
  
 
(6,711
)
    


  


  


  


Balance at September 30, 2002
  
$
46,317
 
  
$
—  
 
  
$
6,313
 
  
$
52,630
 
    


  


  


  


 
At September 30, 2002, remaining cash expenditures resulting from the restructuring are estimated to be $52.6 million and relate primarily to facility lease commitments. Excluding facilities lease commitments, we estimate that these costs will be substantially incurred within one year of the restructuring. We have substantially implemented our restructuring efforts initiated in conjunction with the restructuring announcements made during 2001 and the nine months ended September 30, 2002; however, there can be no assurance that the estimated costs of our restructuring efforts will not change.
 
Consolidation of Excess Facilities
 
Facility lease commitments relate to lease obligations for excess office space that we have vacated or intend to vacate as a result of the restructuring plan. We recorded $6.0 million and $14.5 million in restructuring expense in relation to site consolidations during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002. Total lease commitments include the remaining lease liabilities and brokerage commissions, offset by estimated sublease income. The estimated costs of vacating these leased facilities, including estimated costs to sublease and any resulting sublease income, were based on market information and trend analysis as estimated by us. It is reasonably possible that actual results could differ from these estimates in the near term, and such differences could be material to the financial statements. In particular, actual sublease income attributable to the consolidation of excess facilities might deviate from the assumptions used to calculate the accrual for facility lease commitments. Of the $14.5 million charge recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2002, approximately $9.0 million relates to adjustments in lease assumptions. The remaining $5.5 million relates to additional space consolidation in Austin, Texas; Reston, Virginia; San Ramon, California; Waltham, Massachusetts; Maidenhead, United Kingdom; Hamburg, Germany; Madrid, Spain; Sydney and Melbourne, Australia; Hong Kong and Singapore. Facility lease commitments recorded through December 31, 2001 relate to our departure from certain office space in Austin and Houston, Texas; Redwood City, Los Angeles and San Ramon, California; Boston, Waltham, Reading and Cambridge, Massachusetts; New York, New York; Paris, France; Hamburg, Germany; Madrid, Spain; Sydney, Australia; Bangalore and Guragon, India and Singapore. The maximum lease commitment of such vacated properties is 10 years.
 
Asset Impairments
 
Asset impairments recorded pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, relate to the impairment of certain leasehold improvements and office and computer equipment. These fixed assets were impaired as a result of our decision to vacate certain office space and align our infrastructure with current and projected headcount, resulting in an

21


Table of Contents
impairment of $6.7 million and $7.9 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002, respectively.
 
Employee Separation and Other Costs
 
Employee separation and other costs, which include severance, related taxes, outplacement and other benefits, payable to approximately 400 terminated employees, totaled $5.4 million and $9.4 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002, respectively. Employee groups impacted by the restructuring efforts include personnel in positions throughout the sales, marketing, professional services, engineering and general and administrative functions in all geographies.
 
Amortization of Deferred Stock Compensation.    For the stock options we award to employees from our stock option plans, including those issued as part of the voluntary salary exchange program introduced in March 2002, we have recorded deferred compensation for the difference between the exercise price of certain stock option grants and the market value of our common stock at the time of such grants. For the restricted shares we issued in February 2001 as part of our stock option exchange program, we have recorded deferred compensation for the market value on the issue date. For the stock options we assumed in connection with our acquisition of OnDisplay, Inc. in July 2000, we have recorded deferred compensation for the difference between the exercise price of the unvested stock options and the fair value of our common stock at the acquisition date.
 
We have amortized the deferred compensation amount over the vesting periods of the applicable options and restricted share grants, resulting in amortization expense of $137,000 and $1.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively, and $1.2 million and $8.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Amortization of deferred stock compensation is attributable to the following cost categories (in thousands):
 
    
Three Months Ended
September 30,

  
Nine Months Ended
September 30,

    
2002

  
2001

  
2002

  
2001

Cost of revenue—services
  
$
18
  
$
527
  
$
163
  
$
1,936
Research and development
  
 
62
  
 
496
  
 
372
  
 
2,255
Sales and marketing
  
 
40
  
 
576
  
 
390
  
 
3,127
General and administrative
  
 
17
  
 
132
  
 
285
  
 
1,215
    

  

  

  

    
$
137
  
$
1,731
  
$
1,210
  
$
8,533
    

  

  

  

 
Amortization of Intangibles.    Intangible amortization expense was $334,000 and $125.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively, and $15.6 million and $376.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The decrease in amortization expense for the comparative periods relates to the Company’s adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“Statement 142”), on January 1, 2002. Statement 142 requires that ratable amortization of goodwill be replaced with periodic review and analysis of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets for possible impairment. Intangible assets with a definite life must be amortized over their estimated useful lives. Excluding goodwill, acquired workforce and trademark amortization expense of $123.1 million, adjusted amortization expense was $2.4 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2001. Excluding goodwill, acquired workforce and trademark amortization expense of $369.2 million, adjusted amortization expense was $7.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. As adjusted, both the decrease between the comparative quarters, as well as the increase in the comparative year-to-date expenses, relates to a change in the estimated useful life of technologies purchased as part of the July 2000 OnDisplay, Inc. acquisition. Due to changes in our product architecture and anticipated future product offerings, the estimated life of such acquired technology was reduced from four years to two years. Such technology was fully amortized at June 30, 2002.
 
As required by Statement 142, we are currently completing an annual assessment of goodwill to determine the likelihood of impairment. The value determined in Step 1 of the assessment, which involves comparing the fair value to the carrying value of the reporting unit, is based on a measurement date of October 1, 2002,

22


Table of Contents
and indicates a goodwill impairment at the enterprise level. We will measure the impairment loss, by completing Step 2, during the fourth quarter of 2002. Step 2 involves determining the implied fair value of goodwill at the enterprise level. If the carrying amount of goodwill is greater than the implied fair value of its goodwill, an impairment loss must be recognized for the excess of such amount. Such assessment of goodwill will result in a significant goodwill impairment charge during the fourth quarter of 2002. The Company will report the charge as “Impairment of goodwill,” a component of its operating expenses.
 
Other Income and Expense, Net
 
Other income and expense, net consists primarily of interest income and expense, as well as recognized investment gains and losses. Other expense, net was $4.7 million in the three months ended September 30, 2002, as compared to other expense, net of $4.2 million in the three months ended September 30, 2001. Other expense, net was $1.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2002, as compared to other expense, net of $35.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2001.
 
Included in other income and expense, net, are impairment charges of certain long-term investments. The impaired long-term investments generally consist of redeemable convertible preferred stock in privately-held technology companies as well as common stock in publicly-held technology companies. We periodically analyze our long-term investments for impairments considered other than temporary. As a result of such review, we recognized impairment charges in the following periods (in thousands):
 
    
Three Months Ended
September 30,

    
Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 
    
2002

    
2001

    
2002

    
2001

 
Long-term investment impairment
  
$
(6,038
)
  
$
(7,666
)
  
$
(6,496
)
  
$
(49,063
)
 
Excluding such investment impairment charge, other income and expense, net was $1.3 million income and $3.5 million income for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively, and $4.6 million income and $13.2 million income for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Excluding such investment impairment charges, the net decrease in other income relates primarily to the general decline in investment yields on our lower cash, cash equivalents and short-term investment balances as well as a fixed asset impairment of approximately $750,000 during the third quarter 2002, not related to our restructuring activities.
 
At September 30, 2002, our unrestricted, long-term investments totaled $1.9 million, including an unrealized gain of $26,000. Future adverse changes in market conditions or poor operating results of an investee could require future impairment charges.
 
Provision for Income Taxes
 
We have incurred income tax expense of approximately $70,000 and $297,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively, and $692,000 and $1.4 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The income tax expense consists primarily of estimated withholdings and income taxes due in certain foreign jurisdictions. The decrease in the provision for income taxes relates primarily to an overall decline in revenues, including non-US regions, between the comparative periods.
 
We have provided a full valuation allowance on our net deferred tax assets, which include net operating loss and research and development carryforwards, because of the uncertainty regarding their realization. Our accounting for deferred taxes under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (“Statement 109”), involves the evaluation of a number of factors concerning the realizability of our deferred tax assets. In concluding that a full valuation allowance was required, we primarily considered such factors as our history of operating losses and expected future losses and the nature of our deferred tax assets.

23


Table of Contents
 
Forward-looking Information
 
The following forward-looking information is current as of October 16, 2002 and relates to the sequential quarter ended December 31, 2002, as compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2002, unless otherwise stated.
 
We expect total revenue will decline slightly. Components of total revenue are license revenue, which we expect will remain constant or increase, and services revenue, which we expect to decline approximately 10%. The decline in services revenue is attributable to lower forecasted utilization due to holiday seasonality and required training of our services employees as it relates to our recently announced V7 product suite.
 
We expect our cost of revenue will remain relatively constant in the upcoming quarter. As a percentage of total revenue, gross margins will range between 66% and 69%.
 
To maintain a competitive advantage, we will continue to invest in research and development activities, and therefore expect our research and development costs will be between 37% and 39% of total revenue. We expect our sales and marketing costs will be between 51% and 55% of total revenue and our general and administrative costs will be between 13% and 14% of total revenue. We expect both amortization of intangible assets and deferred stock compensation will be 1%, respectively. Additionally, as a result of our annual impairment test of goodwill which will be completed during the fourth quarter of 2002, we may record an impairment charge that could be material to our financial statements.
 
We expect other income will be 5% of total revenue and the provision for income taxes will be 1% of total revenue. Excluding a goodwill impairment charge, we expect a net loss of $0.04 per share, assuming 251.0 million shares outstanding.
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
The following table presents selected financial statistics and information (dollars in thousands):
 
    
September 30,
2002

  
December 31,
2001

Cash and cash equivalents
  
$
225,237
  
$
348,916
Short-term investments
  
$
109,774
  
$
42,716
Working capital
  
$
260,863
  
$
305,826
Current ratio
  
 
3.5:1
  
 
3.4:1
Days of sales outstanding—for the quarter ended
  
 
71
  
 
61
 
At September 30, 2002, we had $335.0 million in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments and no debt. We have invested cash in excess of operating requirements in short-term, investment-grade securities that are classified as available for sale.
 
Net cash used in operating activities was $60.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, as compared to net cash used in operating activities of $36.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. The increase in operating cash outflows was due primarily to an increase in our net losses, excluding non-cash and restructuring charges. We anticipate using net cash to fund operating activities in future periods as well as to fulfill our restructuring commitments.
 
Net cash used in investing activities was $71.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, as compared to net cash used in investing activities of $14.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. The increase in investing cash outflows was due primarily to our increased investment in short-term marketable securities. This increase was offset in part by decreased capital expenditures. We expect that our future investing activities will generally consist of capital expenditures to support our future needs, investment in short-term securities to maximize investment yields while preserving cash flow for operational purposes and acquisition of intellectual property or complementary businesses to expand our market.

24


Table of Contents
 
Net cash provided by financing activities was $5.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, a decrease of $4.9 million from net cash provided by financing activities for the comparative nine-month period ended September 30, 2001. Our financing activities during both periods consisted primarily of proceeds received from the exercise of employee stock options and the purchase of employee stock purchase plan shares. Also included in our financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2001 was the repurchase of 1.4 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $5.5 million. We have not repurchased any of our common stock during the 2002.
 
As of September 30, 2002, our long-term investments consist of common stock in publicly-held technology companies, limited partnership interests in a technology incubator, and collateral pledged for certain lease obligations. At September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, long-term investments totaled $14.6 million and $22.4 million, respectively. We classify these investments as available-for-sale and have recorded a cumulative net unrealized gain of $26,000 and $1.4 million at September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, respectively.
 
We determined that certain of our long-term investments had experienced a decline in value that was other than temporary, resulting in a recognized investment loss as follows (in thousands):
 
    
Three Months Ended
September 30,

    
Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 
    
2002

    
2001

    
2002

    
2001

 
Long-term investment impairment
  
$
(6,038
)
  
$
(7,666
)
  
$
(6,496
)
  
$
(49,063
)
 
We may continue to invest in companies strategic to our business; however, we do not expect future investments to significantly impact our liquidity position.
 
At September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, we had pledged $12.7 million and $13.7 million, respectively, as collateral for certain of our lease obligations. There are certain time restrictions placed on these instruments that we are obligated to meet in order to liquidate the principal of these investments.
 
We expect our existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term investment balances will decline in future periods. On October 15, 2002, we terminated the majority a significant office lease commitment. Such lease space was vacated as a result of the Company’s restructuring activities that we initiated in 2001 and subsequently expanded during 2002. The termination resulted in a $7.2 million cash payment. Also during the quarter ended December 31, 2002, we expect to pay approximately $26 million in cash for the acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding shares of Epicentric, Inc. We also expect to incur certain cash payments in connection with the integration of Epicentric, Inc. We believe that our existing balances will be sufficient to meet our working capital, capital expenditure and investment requirements for at least the next 12 months. We may require additional funds for other purposes and may seek to raise such additional funds through public and private equity financings from other sources. There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available at all or that, if available, such financing will be obtainable on terms favorable to us or that any additional financing will not be dilutive.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
In November 2001, the FASB issued staff announcement Topic No. D-103, “Income Statement Characterization of Reimbursements Received for “Out-of-Pocket’ Expenses Incurred”, which was subsequently incorporated in Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 01-14 (“EITF Issue No. 01-14”). EITF Issue No. 01-14 requires companies to characterize reimbursements received for out-of-pocket expenses as revenues in the statement of operations. EITF Issue No. 01-14 did not have a significant effect on total services revenues or the services gross margin percentages and has no effect on net income (loss) as it increases both services revenues and cost of services. Because reimbursements received for out-of-pocket expenses were not significant for the respective three or nine months ended September 30, 2001, the condensed consolidated statement of operations for such periods have not been restated.
 
In June 2002, the FASB issued Statement No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (“Statement 146”). Statement 146 addresses accounting for restructuring costs and supersedes

25


Table of Contents
previous accounting guidance, principally EITF Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)” (“EITF Issue No. 94-3”). Statement 146 requires that the liability associated with exit or disposal activities be recognized when the liability is incurred. As a contrast under EITF Issue No. 94-3, a liability for an exit cost is recognized when a Company commits to an exit plan. Statement 146 also establishes that a liability should initially be measured and recorded at fair value. Accordingly, Statement 146 may affect the timing and amount of recognizing restructuring costs. We will adopt the provisions of Statement 146 for any restructuring activities initiated after December 31, 2002.

26


Table of Contents
 
RISK FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS
 
You should carefully consider the following risks before making an investment decision. The risks described below are not the only ones that we face. Our business, operating results or financial condition could be materially adversely affected by any of the following risks. The trading price of our common stock could decline due to any of these risks, and you as an investor may lose all or part of your investment. You should also refer to the other information set forth in this report, including our financial statements and the related notes.
 
Risks Related to Our Business
 
We Expect to Incur Future Losses
 
We have not achieved profitability and we expect to incur net operating losses in the coming quarter and potentially in future quarters. To date, we have primarily funded our operations from the sale of equity securities. We expect to continue to incur significant product development, sales and marketing, and administrative expenses and, as a result, we will need to generate significant revenues to achieve and subsequently maintain profitability. We cannot be certain that we will achieve sufficient revenues for profitability. If we do achieve profitability, we cannot be certain that we can sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis in the future.
 
Our Limited Operating History Makes Financial Forecasting Difficult
 
We were founded in December 1995 and thus have a limited operating history. As a result of our limited operating history, we cannot forecast revenue and operating expenses based on our historical results. Accordingly, we base our expenses in part on future revenue projections. Most of our expenses are fixed in the short term and we may not be able to quickly reduce spending if our revenues are lower than we had projected. Our ability to forecast accurately our quarterly revenue is limited because our software products have a long sales cycle that makes it difficult to predict the quarter in which sales will occur. We would expect our business, operating results and financial condition to be materially adversely affected if our revenues do not meet our projections and that net losses in a given quarter would be greater than expected.
 
Our Stock May Not Meet Market Listing Requirements
 
On October 14, 2002, we received a notice from the Nasdaq Qualifications Department. Such notice indicated that our common stock had closed for 30 consecutive trading days below the applicable minimum bid price of $1.00. The Nasdaq affords a Company 90 calendar days in which to demonstrate compliance with National Market Marketplace Rules; specifically, a company’s common stock must close at or above a bid price of $1.00 per share for a minimum of ten consecutive trading days. On November 13, 2002, our stock closed at or above a bid price of $1.00 per share for the tenth consecutive trading day, demonstrating compliance with the National Market Marketplace Rules.
 
There can be no assurance that we will maintain compliance with the minimum bid price trading requirements, or other requirements, for continued listing on the Nasdaq National Market. Noncompliance with Nasdaq’s Marketplace Rules may materially impair the ability of stockholders to buy and sell shares of our common stock and could have an adverse effect on the market price of, and the efficiency of the trading market for, our common stock, and could significantly impair our ability to raise capital in the public markets should we desire to do so in the future.

27


Table of Contents
 
Recent Terrorist Activities and Resulting Military and Other Actions Could Adversely Affect Our Business
 
The continued threat of terrorism within the United States and abroad and the continuing potential for military action in Afghanistan and other countries and heightened security measures in response to such threat may cause significant disruption to commerce throughout the world. To the extent that such disruptions result in delays or cancellations of customer orders, a general decrease in corporate spending on information technology, or our inability to effectively market, sell and deploy our software and services, our business and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. We are unable to predict whether the threat of terrorism or the responses thereto will result in any long term commercial disruptions or if such activities or responses will have a long term material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.
 
Potential Future Acquisitions, Including Our Anticipated Acquisition of Epicentric, Inc., Could Be Difficult to Integrate, Disrupt Our Business, Dilute Stockholder Value and Adversely Affect Our Operating Results
 
We expect to complete our acquisition of Epicentric in December 2002. Our failure to successfully address the risks associated with this acquisition could harm our ability to integrate and market products based on the acquired technology. We may discover liabilities and risks associated with this acquisition which were not discovered in our due diligence prior to signing the definitive merger agreement. Although we will escrow a portion of the purchase price to cover such liabilities, it is possible that the actual amounts required to cover such liabilities will exceed the escrow amount. Additionally, we may acquire other businesses in the future, which would complicate our management tasks. We may need to integrate widely dispersed operations that have different and unfamiliar corporate cultures. These integration efforts may not succeed or may distract management’s attention from existing business operations. Our failure to successfully manage the anticipated Epicentric acquisition as well as future acquisitions could seriously harm our business. Also, our existing stockholders would experience dilution if we financed the acquisitions by issuing equity securities.
 
We Must Successfully Complete the Implementation of Our Business Restructuring Efforts
 
In accordance with our restructuring efforts announced during 2001 and subsequently expanded during the first and third quarters of 2002, we are currently transitioning our business and realigning our strategic focus towards our core market, technologies and products. Internal changes resulting from our business restructuring announced during 2001 and 2002 are substantially complete, but many factors may negatively impact our ability to implement our strategic focus including our ability to manage the implementation, sustain the productivity of our workforce and retain key employees, manage our operating expenses and quickly respond to and recover from unforeseen events associated with the restructuring. We may be required by market conditions to undertake additional restructuring efforts in the future. Our business, results of operations or financial condition could be materially adversely affected if we are unable to manage the implementation, sustain the productivity of our workforce and retain key employees, manage our operating expenses or quickly respond to and recover from unforeseen events associated with any future restructuring efforts.
 
We Expect Our Quarterly Revenues and Operating Results to Fluctuate
 
Our revenues and operating results have varied significantly from quarter to quarter in the past and we expect that our operating results will continue to vary significantly from quarter to quarter. A number of factors are likely to cause these variations, including:
 
 
 
Demand for our products and services;
 
 
The timing of sales of our products and services;
 
 
The timing of customer orders and product implementations;
 
 
Seasonal fluctuations in information technology purchasing;
 
 
Unexpected delays in introducing new products and services;
 
 
Increased expenses, whether related to sales and marketing, product development or administration;
 
 
Changes in the rapidly evolving market for Web-based applications;
 
 
The mix of product license and services revenue, as well as the mix of products licensed;
 
 
The mix of services provided and whether services are provided by our own staff or third-party contractors;

28


Table of Contents
 
 
The mix of domestic and international sales;
 
 
Difficulties in collecting accounts receivable;
 
 
Costs related to possible acquisitions of technology or businesses; and
 
 
The general economic climate.
 
Accordingly, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our operating results are not necessarily meaningful. Investors should not rely on the results of one quarter as an indication of future performance.
 
We will continue to invest in our research and development, sales and marketing, professional services and general and administrative organizations. We expect such spending, in absolute dollars, will be lower than in recent periods; however, if our revenue expectations are not achieved, our business, operating results or financial condition could be materially adversely affected and net losses in a given quarter would be greater than expected.
 
Our Quarterly Results May Depend on a Small Number of Large Orders
 
In prior quarters, we derived a significant portion of our software license revenues from a small number of relatively large orders. Our operating results could be materially adversely affected if we are unable to complete a significant order that we expected to complete in a specific quarter.
 
If We Experienced a Product Liability Claim We Could Incur Substantial Litigation Costs
 
Since our customers use our products for mission critical applications such as Internet commerce, errors, defects or other performance problems could result in financial or other damages to our customers. They could seek damages for losses from us, which, if successful, could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. Although our license agreements typically contain provisions designed to limit our exposure to product liability claims, existing or future laws or unfavorable judicial decisions could negate or alter such limitation of liability provisions. To date, we have not experienced any product liability claims or litigation that we feel is material to our business. However, such claims if brought against us, even if not successful, would likely be time consuming and costly.
 
We Depend on Increased Business from Our Current and New Customers and if We Fail to Grow Our Customer Base or Generate Repeat Business, Our Operating Results Could Be Harmed
 
If we fail to grow our customer base or generate repeat and expanded business from our current and new customers, our business and operating results would be seriously harmed. Many of our customers initially make a limited purchase of our products and services. Some of these customers may not choose to purchase additional licenses to expand their use of our products. Some of these customers have not yet developed or deployed initial applications based on our products. If these customers do not successfully develop and deploy such initial applications, they may not choose to purchase deployment licenses or additional development licenses. Our business model depends on the expanded use of our products within our customers’ organizations.
 
In addition, as we introduce new versions of our products or new products, our current customers may not require the functionality of our new products and may not ultimately license these products. Because the total amount of maintenance and support fees we receive in any period depends in large part on the size and number of licenses that we have previously sold, any downturn in our software license revenue would negatively impact our future services revenue. In addition, if customers elect not to renew their maintenance agreements, our services revenue could be significantly adversely affected.
 
Our Operating Results May Be Adversely Affected by Small Delays in Customer Orders or Product Implementations
 
Small delays in customer orders or product implementations can cause significant variability in our license revenues and operating results for any particular period. We derive a substantial portion of our revenue from the sale of products with related services. In certain cases, our revenue recognition policy requires us to

29


Table of Contents
substantially complete the implementation of our product before we can recognize software license revenue, and any end-of-quarter delays in product implementation could materially adversely affect operating results for that quarter.
 
In Order to Increase Market Awareness of Our Products and Generate Increased Revenue We Need to Continue to Strengthen Our Sales and Distribution Capabilities
 
Our direct and indirect sales operations must increase market awareness of our products to generate increased revenue. We cannot be certain that we will be successful in these efforts. Our products and services require a sophisticated sales effort targeted at the senior management of our prospective customers. All new hires will require training and will take time to achieve full productivity. We cannot be certain that our new hires will become as productive as necessary or that we will be able to hire enough qualified individuals or retain existing employees in the future. We plan to expand our relationships with systems integrators and certain third-party resellers to build an indirect influence and sales channel. In addition, we will need to manage potential conflicts between our direct sales force and any third-party reselling efforts.
 
Failure to Maintain the Support of Third-Party Systems Integrators May Limit Our Ability to Penetrate Our Markets
 
A significant portion of our sales are influenced by the recommendations of our products made by systems integrators, consulting firms and other third parties that help develop and deploy Web-based applications for our customers. Losing the support of these third parties may limit our ability to penetrate our markets. These third parties are under no obligation to recommend or support our products. These companies could recommend or give higher priority to the products of other companies or to their own products. A significant shift by these companies toward favoring competing products could negatively affect our license and services revenue.
 
Our Lengthy Sales Cycle and Product Implementation Makes It Difficult to Predict Our Quarterly Results
 
We have a long sales cycle because we generally need to educate potential customers regarding the use and benefits of Web-based applications. Our long sales cycle makes it difficult to predict the quarter in which sales may fall. In addition, since we recognize a portion of our revenue from product sales upon implementation of our product, the timing of product implementation could cause significant variability in our license revenues and operating results for any particular period. The implementation of our products requires a significant commitment of resources by our customers, third-party professional services organizations or our professional services organization, which makes it difficult to predict the quarter when implementation will be completed.
 
We May Be Unable to Adequately Sustain a Profitable Professional Services Organization, Which Could Affect Both Our Operating Results and Our Ability to Assist Our Customers with the Implementation of Our Products
 
Customers that license our software often engage our professional services organization to assist with support, training, consulting and implementation of their Web solutions. We believe that growth in our product sales depends in part on our continuing ability to provide our customers with these services and to educate third-party resellers on how to use our products.
 
During recent quarters, our professional services organization achieved profitability; however, prior to 2000, services costs related to professional services had exceeded, or had been substantially equal to, professional services-related revenue. In this current economic climate, we make services capacity decisions on a periodic basis based on our estimates of the future sales pipeline, anticipated existing customer needs, and general market conditions. Although we expect that our professional services-related revenue will continue to exceed professional services-related costs in future periods, we cannot be certain that this will occur.

30


Table of Contents
 
We generally bill our customers for our services on a time-and-materials basis. However, from time to time we enter into fixed-price contracts for services, and may include terms and conditions that may extend the recognition of revenue for work performed into following quarters. On occasion, the costs of providing the services have exceeded our fees from these contracts and such contracts have negatively impacted our operating results.
 
We May Be Unable to Attract Necessary Third-Party Service Providers, Which Could Affect Our Ability to Provide Support, Consulting and Implementation Services for Our Products
 
We are actively attempting to supplement the capabilities of our services organization by attracting and educating third-party service providers and consultants to also provide these services. We may not be successful in attracting these third-party providers or maintaining the interest of current third- party providers. In addition, these third parties may not devote enough resources to these activities.
 
Our Business May Become Increasingly Susceptible to Numerous Risks Associated with International Operations
 
International operations are generally subject to a number of risks, including:
 
 
 
Expenses associated with customizing products for foreign countries;
 
 
Protectionist laws and business practices that favor local competition;
 
 
Changes in jurisdictional tax laws;
 
 
Dependence on local vendors;
 
 
Multiple, conflicting and changing governmental laws and regulations;
 
 
Longer sales cycles;
 
 
Difficulties in collecting accounts receivable;
 
 
Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations; and
 
 
Political and economic instability.
 
We recorded 30% of our total revenue for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 through licenses and services sold to customers located outside of the United States. We expect international revenue to remain a large percentage of total revenue and we believe that we must continue to expand our international sales activities in order to be successful. Our international sales growth will be limited if we are unable to establish additional foreign operations, expand international sales channel management and support organizations, hire additional personnel, customize products for local markets, develop relationships with international service providers and establish relationships with additional distributors and third-party integrators. In that case, our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. Even if we are able to successfully expand international operations, we cannot be certain that we will be able to maintain or increase international market demand for our products.
 
To date, a majority of our international revenues and costs have been denominated in foreign currencies. We believe that portion of our international revenues and costs will be denominated in foreign currencies in the future. To date, we have not engaged in any foreign exchange hedging transactions and we are therefore subject to foreign currency risk.
 
In Order to Properly Manage Future Growth, We May Need to Implement and Improve Our Operational Systems on a Timely Basis
 
We have experienced periods of rapid expansion since our inception. Rapid growth places a significant demand on management and operational resources. In order to manage such growth effectively, we must implement and improve our operational systems, procedures and controls on a timely basis. If we fail to implement and improve these systems, our business, operating results and financial condition will be materially adversely affected.

31


Table of Contents
 
We May Be Adversely Affected if We Lose Key Personnel or if We Are Unable to Manage the Transition in Leadership of the Company
 
Our success depends largely on the skills, experience and performance of some key members of our management. If we lose one or more of our key employees, our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. In addition, our future success will depend largely on our ability to continue attracting and retaining highly skilled personnel. Like other software companies, we face competition for qualified personnel, particularly in the Austin, Texas area. We cannot be certain that we will be successful in attracting, assimilating or retaining qualified personnel in the future.
 
We Have Relied and Expect to Continue to Rely on Sales of Our Vignette® V/Series Product Line for Our Revenue
 
We currently derive substantially all of our revenues from the license and related upgrades, professional services and support of our Vignette® V/Series software products. We expect that we will continue to depend on revenue related to our Vignette® V6 product line for at least the next several quarters. We cannot be certain that we will successfully develop and market our new Vignette ® V7 offerings, announced in October 2002. If we do not continue to increase revenue related to our existing products or generate revenue from new products and services, our business, operating results and financial condition would be materially adversely affected.
 
Our Future Revenue is Dependent Upon Our Ability to Successfully Market Our Existing and Future Products
 
We expect that our future financial performance will depend significantly on revenue from existing and future software products and the related tools that we plan to develop, which is subject to significant risks. There are significant risks inherent in a product introduction such as our recently announce Vignette® V7 software products. Market acceptance of these and future products will depend on continued market development for Internet products and services and the commercial adoption of Vignette® V7. We cannot be certain that either will occur. We cannot be certain that our existing or future products offering will meet customer performance needs or expectations when shipped or that it will be free of significant software defects or bugs. If our products do not meet customer needs or expectations, for whatever reason, upgrading or enhancing the product could be costly and time consuming.
 
If We are Unable to Meet the Rapid Changes in Software Technology, Our Existing Products Could Become Obsolete
 
The market for our products is marked by rapid technological change, frequent new product introductions and Internet-related technology enhancements, uncertain product life cycles, changes in customer demands, changes in packaging and combination of existing products and evolving industry standards. We cannot be certain that we will successfully develop and market new products, new product enhancements or new products compliant with present or emerging Internet technology standards. New products based on new technologies, new industry standards or new combinations of existing products as bundled products can render existing products obsolete and unmarketable. To succeed, we will need to enhance our current products and develop new products on a timely basis to keep pace with developments related to Internet technology and to satisfy the increasingly sophisticated requirements of our customers. Internet commerce technology, particularly Web-based applications technology, is complex and new products and product enhancements can require long development and testing periods. Any delays in developing and releasing enhanced or new products could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
 
We Face Intense Competition from Other Software Companies, Which Could Make it Difficult to Acquire and Retain Customers Now and in the Future
 
Our market is intensely competitive. Our customers’ requirements and the technology available to satisfy those requirements continually change. We expect competition to persist and intensify in the future.
 
Our principal competitors include: in-house development efforts by potential customers or partners; other

32


Table of Contents
vendors of software that directly address elements of Web-based applications; and developers of software that address only certain technology components of Web-based applications (e.g., content management).
 
Many of these companies, as well as some other competitors, have longer operating histories and significantly greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources than we do. Many of these companies can also leverage extensive customer bases and adopt aggressive pricing policies to gain market share. Potential competitors may bundle their products in a manner that may discourage users from purchasing our products. In addition, it is possible that new competitors or alliances among competitors may emerge and rapidly acquire significant market share.
 
Competitive pressures may make it difficult for us to acquire and retain customers and may require us to reduce the price of our software. We cannot be certain that we will be able to compete successfully with existing or new competitors. If we fail to compete successfully against current or future competitors, our business, operating results and financial condition would be materially adversely affected.
 
We Develop Complex Software Products Susceptible to Software Errors or Defects that Could Result in Lost Revenues, or Delayed or Limited Market Acceptance
 
Complex software products such as ours often contain errors or defects, particularly when first introduced or when new versions or enhancements are released. Despite internal testing and testing by current and potential customers, our current and future products may contain serious defects. Serious defects or errors could result in lost revenues or a delay in market acceptance, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
 
Our Product Shipments Could Be Delayed if Third-Party Software Incorporated in Our Products is No Longer Available
 
We integrate third-party software as a component of our software. The third-party software may not continue to be available to us on commercially reasonable terms. If we cannot maintain licenses to key third-party software, shipments of our products could be delayed until equivalent software could be developed or licensed and integrated into our products, which could materially adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.
 
Our Business is Based on Our Intellectual Property and We Could Incur Substantial Costs Defending Our Intellectual Property from Infringement or a Claim of Infringement
 
In recent years, there has been significant litigation in the United States involving patents and other intellectual property rights. We could incur substantial costs to prosecute or defend any such litigation. Although we are not involved in any such litigation which we believe is material to the Company’s business, if we become a party to litigation in the future to protect our intellectual property or as a result of an alleged infringement of other’s intellectual property, we may be forced to do one or more of the following:
 
 
 
Cease selling, incorporating or using products or services that incorporate the challenged intellectual property;
 
 
Obtain from the holder of the infringed intellectual property right a license to sell or use the relevant technology, which license may not be available on reasonable terms; and
 
 
Redesign those products or services that incorporate such technology.
 
We rely on a combination of patent, trademark, trade secret and copyright law and contractual restrictions to protect our technology. These legal protections provide only limited protection. If we litigated to enforce our rights, it would be expensive, divert management resources and may not be adequate to protect our business.

33


Table of Contents
 
Anti-Takeover Provisions in Our Corporate Documents and Delaware Law Could Prevent or Delay a Change in Control of Our Company
 
Certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition that a stockholder may consider favorable. Such provisions include:
 
 
 
Authorizing the issuance of “blank check” preferred stock;
 
 
Providing for a classified board of directors with staggered, three-year terms;
 
 
Prohibiting cumulative voting in the election of directors;
 
 
Requiring super-majority voting to effect certain amendments to our certificate of incorporation and bylaws;
 
 
Limiting the persons who may call special meetings of stockholders;
 
 
Prohibiting stockholder action by written consent; and
 
 
Establishing advance notice requirements for nominations for election to the board of directors or for proposing matters that can be acted on by stockholders at stockholder meetings.
 
Certain provisions of Delaware law and our stock incentive plans may also discourage, delay or prevent someone from acquiring or merging with us.
 
Further, in April 2002, the Company’s Board of Directors approved, adopted and entered into, a shareholder rights plan (the “Plan”). The plan is similar to plans adopted by many other companies, and was not adopted in response to any attempt to acquire the Company, nor was the Company aware of any such efforts at the time of adoption.
 
The Plan is designed to enable the Company’s stockholders to realize the full value of their investment by providing for fair and equal treatment of all stockholders in the event that an unsolicited attempt is made to acquire the company. Adoption of the shareholder rights plan is intended to guard shareholders against abusive and coercive takeover tactics.
 
Under the shareholder rights plan, stockholders of record as of the close of business on May 6, 2002, received one right to purchase a one one-thousandth of a share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, par $0.01 per share, at a price of $30.00 per one one-thousandth, subject to adjustment. The rights were issued as a non-taxable dividend and will expire 10 years from the date of the adoption of the rights plan, unless earlier redeemed or exchanged. The rights are not immediately exercisable; however, they will become exercisable upon the earlier to occur of (i) the close of business on the tenth day after a public announcement that a person or group has acquired beneficial ownership of 15 percent or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock or (ii) the close of business on the tenth day (or such later date as may be determined by the Board of Directors prior to such time as any person becomes an acquiring person) following the commencement of, or announcement of an intention to make, a tender offer or exchange offer that would result in the beneficial ownership by a person or group of 15 percent or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock. If a person or group acquires 15 percent or more of the Company’s common stock, then all rights holders except the acquirer will be entitled to acquire the Company’s common stock at a significant discount. The intended effect will be to discourage acquisitions of 15 percent or more of the Company’s common stock without negotiation with the Board of Directors.
 
Risks Related to the Software Industry
 
Our Business is Sensitive to the Overall Economic Environment; the Continued Slowdown in Information Technology Spending Could Harm Our Operating Results
 
The primary customers for our products are enterprises seeking to launch or expand Web-based initiatives. The continued significant downturn in our customers’ markets and in general economic conditions that result in reduced information technology spending budgets would likely result in a decreased demand for our products and services and harm our business. Industry downturns like these have been, and may continue to be, characterized by diminished product demand, erosion of average selling prices, lower than expected revenues and difficulty making collections from existing customers.

34


Table of Contents
 
Our Performance Will Depend on the Market for Web-Based Applications Software
 
The market for Web-based applications software is rapidly evolving. We expect that we will continue to need intensive marketing and sales efforts to educate prospective customers about the uses and benefits of our products and services. Accordingly, we cannot be certain that a viable market for our products will emerge or be sustainable. Enterprises that have already invested substantial resources in other methods of conducting business may be reluctant or slow to adopt a new approach that may replace, limit or compete with their existing systems. Similarly, individuals have established patterns of purchasing goods and services. They may be reluctant to alter those patterns. They may also resist providing the personal data necessary to support our existing and potential product uses. Any of these factors could inhibit the growth of online business generally and the market’s acceptance of our products and services in particular.
 
There is Substantial Risk that Future Regulations Could Be Enacted that Either Directly Restrict Our Business or Indirectly Impact Our Business by Limiting the Growth of Internet Commerce
 
As Internet commerce evolves, we expect that federal, state or foreign agencies will adopt regulations covering issues such as user privacy, pricing, content and quality of products and services. If enacted, such laws, rules or regulations could limit the market for our products and services, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results. Although many of these regulations may not apply to our business directly, we expect that laws regulating the solicitation, collection or processing of personal and consumer information could indirectly affect our business. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 prohibits certain types of information and content from being transmitted over the Internet. The prohibition’s scope and the liability associated with a Telecommunications Act violation are currently unsettled. In addition, although substantial portions of the Communications Decency Act were held to be unconstitutional, we cannot be certain that similar legislation will not be enacted and upheld in the future. It is possible that such legislation could expose companies involved in Internet commerce to liability, which could limit the growth of Internet commerce generally. Legislation like the Telecommunications Act and the Communications Decency Act could dampen the growth in Web usage and decrease its acceptance as a communications and commercial medium.
 
The United States government also regulates the export of encryption technology, which our products incorporate. If our export authority is revoked or modified, if our software is unlawfully exported or if the United States government adopts new legislation or regulation restricting export of software and encryption technology, our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. Current or future export regulations may limit our ability to distribute our software outside the United States. Although we take precautions against unlawful export of our software, we cannot effectively control the unauthorized distribution of software across the Internet.
 
Risks Related to the Securities Markets
 
Our Stock Price May Be Volatile
 
The market price of our common stock has been highly volatile and has fluctuated significantly in the past. We believe that it may continue to fluctuate significantly in the future in response to the following factors, some of which are beyond our control:
 
 
 
Variations in quarterly operating results;
 
 
Changes in financial estimates by securities analysts;
 
 
Changes in market valuations of Internet software companies;
 
 
Announcements by us of significant contracts, acquisitions, restructurings, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments;
 
 
Loss of a major customer or failure to complete significant license transactions;
 
 
Additions or departures of key personnel;
 
 
Difficulties in collecting accounts receivable;
 
 
Sales of common stock in the future; and
 
 
Fluctuations in stock market price and volume, which are particularly common among highly volatile securities of Internet and software companies.

35


Table of Contents
 
Our Business May Be Adversely Affected by Class Action Litigation Due to Stock Price Volatility
 
In the past, securities class action litigation has often been brought against a company following periods of volatility in the market price of its securities. We are a party to the securities class action litigation described in Part II, Item 1 – “Legal Proceedings” of this Report. The defense of this litigation described in Part II, Item 1 may increase our expenses and divert our management’s attention and resources, and an adverse outcome could harm our business and results of operations. Additionally, we may in the future be the target of similar litigation. Future securities litigation could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention and resources, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
 
We May Be Unable to Meet Our Future Capital Requirements
 
Although we expect our cash balances to decline in the near future, we expect the cash on hand, cash equivalents and short-term investments to meet our working capital and capital expenditure needs for at least the next 12 months. We may need to raise additional funds and we cannot be certain that we would be able to obtain additional financing on favorable terms, if at all. Further, if we issue equity securities, stockholders may experience additional dilution or the new equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of existing holders of common stock. If we cannot raise funds, if needed, on acceptable terms, we may not be able to develop or enhance our products, take advantage of future opportunities or respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated requirements, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

36


Table of Contents
 
ITEM 3 — QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
 
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
 
The majority of our operations are based in the United States and accordingly, the majority of our transactions are denominated in U.S. Dollars. We have operations throughout the Americas, Europe, Asia and Australia where transactions are denominated in the local currency of each location. As a result, our financial results could be affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates. We currently do not use derivatives to hedge potential exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk. To date, the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations has not been material to our consolidated financial statements.
 
Interest Rate Risk
 
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments    Our interest income is sensitive to changes in the general level of U.S. interest rates, particularly since the majority of our investments are in short-term instruments. Due to the nature of our short-term investments, we have concluded that we do not have material market risk exposure. Our investment policy requires us to invest funds in excess of current operating requirements in:
 
 
 
obligations of the U.S. government and its agencies;
 
 
investment grade state and local government obligations;
 
 
securities of U.S. corporations rated A1 or P1 by Standard & Poors or the Moody’s equivalents; and
 
 
money market funds, deposits or notes issued or guaranteed by U.S. and non-U.S. commercial banks meeting certain credit rating and net worth requirements with maturities of less than two years.
 
At September 30, 2002, our cash and cash equivalents consisted primarily of commercial paper and market auction preferreds. Our short-term investments were invested in corporate notes, corporate bonds and medium-term notes in large U.S. institutions and debt securities in large foreign companies. Such short-term investments will mature in less than one year from September 30, 2002.
 
Long-term investments    Our long-term investments were established to allow us to invest in emerging technology companies considered strategic to our software business. At September 30, 2002, our remaining long-term investments consisted of common stock held in publicly-traded technology companies and a limited partnership interest in a technology incubator. Our investments in redeemable convertible preferred stock in privately-held technology companies were fully impaired as of September 30, 2002. There is no established market for our investments in non-public entities; therefore, we value such investments based on the most recent round of financing involving new non-strategic investors and, where appropriate, by estimates made by management. We classify our long-term investments as available-for-sale and have recorded a cumulative net unrealized gain of $26,000 and $1.4 million related to these securities at September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, respectively.
 
We periodically analyze our long-term investments for impairments that could be deemed other than temporary.
 
In addition to these strategic investments, we held $12.7 million and $13.7 million in restricted investments at September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, respectively. These investments support certain leased office space security deposits. Such investments are placed with a high credit quality financial institution. There are certain time restrictions placed on these instruments that we are obligated to meet in order to liquidate the principal of these investments. The maturity dates range from 2002 to 2010 and the average yield of these investments is approximately 2.18%.

37


Table of Contents
 
ITEM 4 — CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
 
During the 90-day period prior to the filing date of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, the Company, under supervision and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective, in all material respects, to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported in a timely manner.
 
There have been no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls or in other factors which could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date the Company carried out its evaluation.

38


Table of Contents
 
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
 
ITEM 1 – LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
 
On October 26, 2001, a class action lawsuit was filed against the Company and certain of its current and former officers and directors in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in an action captioned Leon Leybovich v. Vignette Corporation, et al., seeking unspecified damages on behalf of a purported class that purchased Vignette common stock between February 18, 1999 and December 6, 2000. Also named as defendants were four underwriters involved in the Company’s initial public offering of Vignette stock in February 1999 and the Company’s secondary public offering of Vignette stock in December 1999 – Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, Inc., Hambrecht & Quist, LLC, Dain Rauscher Wessels and U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray, Inc. The complaint alleges violations of Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, based on, among other things, claims that the four underwriters awarded material portions of the shares in the Company’s initial and secondary public offerings to certain customers in exchange for excessive commissions. The plaintiff also asserts that the underwriters engaged in “tie-in arrangements” whereby certain customers were allocated shares of Company stock sold in its initial and secondary public offerings in exchange for an agreement to purchase additional shares in the aftermarket at pre-determined prices. With respect to the Company, the complaint alleges that the Company and its officers and directors failed to disclose the existence of these purported excessive commissions and tie-in arrangements in the prospectus and registration statement for the Company’s initial public offering and the prospectus and registration statement for the Company’s secondary public offering. The Company believes that this lawsuit is without merit and intends to defend itself vigorously.
 
The Company is also subject to various legal proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company’s management does not expect that the results in any of these legal proceedings will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

39


Table of Contents
 
ITEM 6 – EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
 
(a)    Exhibits
 
The following exhibits are filed as a part of this Report:
 
Exhibit
Number

 
Description

  2.1*
 
Agreement between Registrant and Diffusion, Inc. dated May 10, 1999.
  2.2**
 
Agreement between Registrant and DataSage, Inc. dated January 7, 2000.
  2.3****
 
Agreement and Plan of Merger, among Registrant, Wheels Acquisition Corp. and OnDisplay, Inc. dated May 21, 2000.
  3.1†
 
Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant.
  3.2***
 
Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant.
  3.3†
 
Bylaws of the Registrant.
  3.4††††
 
Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of the Registrant.
  4.1
 
Reference is made to Exhibits 3.1, 3.2. and 3.3
  4.2†
 
Specimen common stock certificate.
  4.3†
 
Fifth Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement dated November 30, 1998.
  4.4††††
 
Rights Agreement dated April 25, 2002 between the Company and Mellon Investor Services, LLC.
10.1†
 
Form of Indemnification Agreements.
10.2†
 
1995 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan and forms of agreements thereunder.
10.3†
 
1999 Equity Incentive Plan.
10.4†††
 
Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
10.5†
 
1999 Non-Employee Directors Option Plan.
10.11†
 
“Prism” Development and Marketing Agreement dated July 19, 1996 between the Registrant and CNET, Inc.
10.12†
 
Letter Amendment to “Prism” Development and Marketing Agreement between the Registrant and CNET, Inc. dated August 15, 1998 and attachments thereto.
10.18††
 
Lease Agreement dated March 3, 2000 between the Registrant and Prentiss Properties Acquisition Partners, L.P.
10.19††
 
First Amendment to Lease Agreement dated September 1, 2000 between the Registrant and Prentiss Properties Acquisition Partners, L.P.
10.20††
 
Sublease dated September 26, 2000 among the Registrant, Aptis, Inc. and Billing Concepts Corp.
99.1
 
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
99.2
 
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-68345).
††
 
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 10-K/A filed on March 30, 2001 (File No. 000-25375).
†††
 
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on March 29, 2002 (File No. 000-25375).
††††
 
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed on April 30, 2002 (File No. 000-25375).
*
 
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on July 15, 1999 (File No. 000-25375).
**
 
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on February 29, 2000 (File No. 000-25375).
***
 
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for Special Meeting of Stockholders, dated February 17, 2000.
****
 
Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4, as amended (File No. 333-38478).
 
(b)    Reports on Form 8-K
 
None.

40


Table of Contents
 
SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
   
VIGNETTE CORPORATION
Date: November 14, 2002
 
By:  /s/  CHARLES W. SANSBURY

   
Charles W. Sansbury
Chief Financial Officer
(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal
  Financial Officer)

41


Table of Contents
 
Certification
 
I, Thomas E. Hogan, certify that:
 
 
1.
 
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vignette Corporation;
 
 
2.
 
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 
3.
 
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 
4.
 
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
 
 
a)
 
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 
b)
 
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
 
 
c)
 
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 
 
5.
 
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 
a)
 
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 
b)
 
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and
 
 
6.
 
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
Date: November 14, 2002
 
/s/  THOMAS E. HOGAN

Thomas E. Hogan
President and Chief Executive Officer

42


Table of Contents
 
Certification
 
I, Charles W. Sansbury, certify that:
 
 
1.
 
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vignette Corporation;
 
 
2.
 
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 
3.
 
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 
4.
 
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
 
 
a)
 
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 
b)
 
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
 
 
c)
 
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 
 
5.
 
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 
a)
 
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 
b)
 
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and
 
 
6.
 
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
Date:  November 14, 2002
 
/s/  CHARLES W. SANSBURY

Charles W. Sansbury
Chief Financial Officer
 

43