Back to GetFilings.com

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

______________

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

[X]

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2001

or

 [  ]

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from       to     

Commission File Number 0-29038

Tanisys Technology, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

              Wyoming                                            

                     74-2675493

        (State or other jurisdiction of

   (I.R.S. Employer

         incorporation or organization)

        Identification Number)

                 12201 Technology Blvd., Suite 125

           78727

                             Austin, Texas

              (Address of principal executive offices)  

        (Zip Code)

(512) 335-4440

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:  NONE

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, No Par Value Per Share

(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  [X] Yes     [  ] No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendments to this Form 10-K.   [  ]

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by nonaffiliates of the registrant as of December 17, 2001 was approximately   1,328,114 based upon the closing sale price of the Common Stock as reported on the Nasdaq OTC Bulletin Board. Shares of common stock held by each executive officer and director and by each person who owns 5% or more of the outstanding Common Stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

Indicated below is the number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s only class of common stock at December 17, 2001:

Number of Shares

Title of Class

    Outstanding

Common Stock, no par value

      24,147,534

Documents Incorporated by Reference

Portions of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”) to be held February 26, 2002, and to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after registrant’s fiscal year ended September 30, 2001 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.

#

TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

2001 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

INDEX

           PAGE

PART I     

Item 1.

Business…………………………………………………………………..……...….........…….…   

    4

Item 2.

Properties…………………………………………………………………...…...….........……….

 110

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings………………………………………………………………..…...….......….

 110

Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders….………..…...…........……….…..

 110

PART II    

Item 5.

Market for the Company’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters……..

 121

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data ……………………………………………………….…………………

 153

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

Results of Operations ……………………………………………………….……………………

 164

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.....................……………..

 295

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data ………………………………………..

 295

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting

and Financial Disclosure……………………………………………………………..…......…..

 5547

PART III.

Item 10.

Directors and Executive Officers of the Company ………………………………………...

5547

Item 11.

Executive Compensation………………………………………………………….……………..

560

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management………………….

56

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions ………………………………………….

568

PART IV.

Item 14.

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K ………………….

568

SIGNATURES…………………………………………………………………..................………….

624

#

PART I.

ITEM 1.

BUSINESS

Forward-Looking Statements - Cautionary Statements

The following discussions contain trend information and other forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. The actual results of Tanisys Technology, Inc., and its wholly owned subsidiaries, 1st Tech Corporation ("1st Tech"), DarkHorse Systems, Inc. ("DarkHorse") Rosetta Marketing and Sales, Inc. ("Rosetta"), and Tanisys (Europe) Ltd. (collectively, the “Company” or "Tanisys"), could differ materially from their historical results of operations and those discussed in the forward-looking statements. All of the stock of Tanisys (Europe) Ltd. was sold in December 1999 as part of the sale of the memory module manufacturing business.  The forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs of the Company's management as well as assumptions made by and information currentl y available to the Company's management. When used herein, the words "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "expect" and "intend" and words or phrases of similar import, as they relate to the Company or its subsidiaries or the Company's management, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements reflect the current risks, uncertainties and assumptions related to certain factors. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include, but are not limited to, business conditions and growth in the electronics industry and general economies, both domestic and international; lower than expected customer orders; customer relationships and financial condition; relationships with vendors; the interest rate environment; governmental regulation and supervision; seasonality; distribution networks; delays in receipt of orders or cancellation of orders; competitive factors, including increased competition and new product offerings by compe titors and price pressures; the availability of parts and supplies at reasonable prices; changing technologies; acceptance and inclusion of the Company's technologies by original equipment manufacturers ("OEMs"); changes in product mix; new product development; the negotiation of new contracts; significant quarterly performance fluctuation due to the receipt of a significant portion of customer orders and product shipments in the last month of each quarter; product shipment interruptions due to manufacturing problems; one-time events; and other factors described herein. Based upon changing conditions, should any one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should any underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described herein as anticipated, believed, estimated, expected or intended. The Company does not intend to update these forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements should be read in light of these factors and the factors identified in "Item 1. Business" and in "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." All references to year periods refer to the Company's fiscal years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 or 1999, and references to quarterly periods refer to the Company's fiscal quarters ended December 31, March 31, June 30 and September 30.

General

The Company designs, manufactures and markets production level automated test equipment for a wide variety of semiconductor memory technologies, including Dynamic Random Access Memory (“DRAM”), Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory (“SDRAM”), Double Data Rate Synchronous DRAM (“DDR”), Rambus DRAM (“RDRAM®”) and Flash Memory. Operating under the Tanisys Technology name since 1994, the Company has developed into an independent manufacturer of memory test systems for standard and custom semiconductor memory.  These systems are used at semiconductor manufacturers, computer and electronics Original Equipment Manufacturers (“OEMs”) and independent memory module manufacturers. The Company markets a line of memory test systems under the DarkHorse® Systems brand name.  The Company's customer base covers a number of worldwid e markets including semiconductor manufacturers, memory module manufacturers, computing systems OEMs and contract manufacturing companies.

During fiscal 1999, a significant portion of the Company’s revenues were derived from manufacturing and sales of semiconductor memory modules.  Memory module sales accounted for 80.3% of total net sales for fiscal 1999.  In December of 1999, the Company sold certain assets and liabilities related to the memory module manufacturing business and exited the memory module manufacturing business.  Included in the sale was all the stock of Tanisys (Europe) Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.  A shortage of computer memory chips in the fourth fiscal quarter of 1999 and a rapid increase in memory prices during the same period severely disrupted the Company’s memory module manufacturing business.  After dropping by approximately 95% from 1996 to mid-1999, memory chip prices escalated rapidly in August and September 1999, before lev eling off in October 1999. During this period in 1999, the Company had great difficulties obtaining DRAM inventory and lost several key orders.  Further, the Company’s memory module manufacturing business in Scotland dropped off completely at the end of the fourth fiscal quarter due to the loss of the Company’s major U.K. customer, who was acquired by another semiconductor manufacturer and ceased doing business with the Company.  

The sale of the memory module manufacturing business has significantly reduced the Company’s revenues. Since 1999, the Company has concentrated all its resources on the memory test systems business as new technologies such as higher speed synchronous DRAM, Rambusâ memory, Double Data Rate synchronous DRAM and Flash memory become prevalent requirements of computing products.

Common Stock Reverse Split

At the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 23, 2000, the Company’s stockholders approved a one-for-two reverse stock split of the Company’s Common Stock (the “Reverse Split”) effective May 25, 2000.  The Reverse Split had no effect on the number of authorized shares of Common Stock or preferred stock.  Any stockholder otherwise entitled to any fractional share interest due to the Reverse Split received in lieu thereof, one additional share of Common Stock for the fractional share such stockholder would have been entitled to as a result of the Reverse Split.

The number of shares and per share amounts of the Company’s Common Stock, warrants and stock options set forth herein have been retroactively adjusted for all periods presented to reflect the Reverse Split.

Industry Overview

The economic downturn that has occurred during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2001 has had an impact on purchases and capital spending in many of the worldwide markets the Company serves.  Management is uncertain as to how long the current downturn may be in these markets.

The demand for semiconductor memory in digital electronic systems has grown significantly over the last several years, according to Dataquest, Semico Research and other market research firms. This demand results from the increased importance of memory in determining system performance. An increasing demand for greater system performance requires that electronics manufacturers increase the amount of semiconductor memory incorporated into a system.

Factors contributing to the demand for memory include unit sales of personal computers ("PCs") in the business and consumer market segments, increasing use of PCs to perform memory-intensive graphics tasks, increasingly faster microprocessors, the release of increasingly memory intensive software and the increasing performance requirements of PCs, workstations, servers and networking and telecommunications equipment. Additionally, there are future high growth requirements for semiconductor memory with the escalating needs of wireless and portable devices such as cell phones, digital cameras, personal digital assistants and other consumer oriented products.

Semiconductor memory products are segmented into three primary classes: Dynamic Random Access Memory ("DRAM"), Static Random Access Memory ("SRAM") and non-volatile memory, such as Flash memory. DRAM typically is the large "main" semiconductor memory of systems, SRAM provides higher performance and Flash memory and other non-volatile memory retain their contents when power is removed. In addition, within each of these broad categories of memory products, semiconductor manufacturers are offering an increasing variety of memory devices designed for application specific uses.

The growing variety of memory components drives the increasing demand for DarkHorse type cost-effective production memory test systems to test each of these categories of memory.

Memory Module Market

Since the memory module market influences the memory module test systems market, the Company feels it is appropriate to comment briefly about the memory module market. Semiconductor memory modules (“modules”) are small printed circuit board assemblies containing semiconductor memory devices and support components. Many computer and electronic systems use modules to permit OEMs to more easily upgrade their systems and to increase flexibility by permitting different types of modules to configure one base system for multiple price or performance targets. Semiconductor memory modules are nearly always attached to a main system board in a daughter card fashion rather than directly to a computer system board, for reasons of upgradeability and flexibility.  Memory modules permit OEMs to manufacture systems on a build-to-order (“BTO”) basis by configuring the system aft er the customer's order is placed. The benefits of BTO for OEMs are faster announcement of new systems, increased customer satisfaction, reduced inventory risk and reduced costs, all of which require cost effective, high speed, high quality and flexible memory module test systems capability.

Modules typically are manufactured by leading semiconductor memory component companies and independent third party suppliers. Semiconductor manufacturers sell modules almost exclusively to OEMs.  Third party manufacturers of modules supply product to two primary market segments: the OEM channel and the reseller channel. Third party suppliers to the OEM channel typically offer custom product, although some computer and peripheral OEMs use off-the-shelf modules. Third party suppliers to the reseller channel typically offer standard DRAM modules as an upgrade product sold through computer distributors and retail channels. Both semiconductor memory suppliers and independent third party module manufacturers are customers for memory module test systems.  In addition, contract manufacturing companies and systems OEMs have the requirement to test memory modules.

Memory Module Test Systems Market

Memory module test systems are important to assure that semiconductor memory modules meet the necessary specifications of performance. The memory module test systems market typically is segmented into memory semiconductor manufacturing and third party memory module manufacturers for PC OEMs and the aftermarket.  System OEMs typically require the manufacturer of their memory modules to test their completed modules under demands similar to actual use. Most module manufacturers perform "at-speed" testing of all modules with accurate test systems. The Company believes that module test system buyers typically evaluate reliability, productivity, accuracy, advanced automation, software flexibility, service, customer support and price as purchase criteria. Significant new purchases of capital equipment for test capacity are likely, due to changing memory technology architectures and strong growth in memory demand.

The actual test sequence for a memory module is unique to its design in terms of architecture, pinout, speed rating, voltage, organization and size and will use any of several common test algorithms. Therefore, the number of potential memory test configurations is much greater than the number of semiconductor memory module types. This makes test development a potentially costly and labor intensive task. The ability of a test system manufacturer to provide support for the development of low cost, accurate tests is a significant consideration in the buying decision.

Flash Memory Market

Flash memory is a non-volatile memory capable of retaining data even when power has been removed.  Flash is projected to be one of the fastest growing segments of the semiconductor industry, with unit shipments growing at a 15% compounded annual rate.  The Flash memory market consists primarily of device level and card level segments.  Device level Flash predominantly comes in two architecture types, NOR and NAND Flash. NAND Flash is projected to grow at over 60% annually over the next 5 years, as consumer applications such as digital cameras, camcorders, PDA’s, cell phones, and solid state replacements for CD audio/video and VHS tapes drive unit and density growth.

Flash cards are a growing end use application of Flash memory, with these cards being used in many of the consumer applications mentioned previously, specifically hand-held devices such as PDA’s, MP3 players, cell phones and digital cameras.  The Flash card market is projected to grow at nearly 30% annually over the next 5 years.

Flash Memory Test Systems Market

The market for test systems for Flash memory can be divided into two top-level segments: Flash card test and Flash device test.  The Flash device test system market is well established, with several large ATE companies offering solutions.  However, as Flash densities continue to skyrocket, there is a tremendous push from IDMs (Integrated Device Manufacturers) for lower cost test solutions, since the cost of test will rise dramatically as the densities grow.

The market for Flash card test is an emerging market, with very few entrenched competitors.  Many manufacturers currently use in-house test solutions, as their volumes have been too low in the past to justify an outside test product.  However, as volumes are projected to grow rapidly in the small form-factor flash-card market, most manufacturers are now looking for outside test solutions to meet their future needs.

Products and Services of the Company

The Company designs, manufactures and markets semiconductor memory test systems. The Company's memory test systems are oriented for both memory module assembly manufacturing and memory aftermarket purposes and include a broad line of test fixtures, test algorithm suites and test services.

Memory Module Test Systems Products

The Company's memory module test systems are marketed under the DarkHorse brand name to utilize existing brand awareness. The current product line includes various models of the SIGMA·3 aimed at specific variations in technology. The SIGMA·3 test system is sold to semiconductor memory manufacturers who build leading edge Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory (“SDRAM”) modules for the latest PC100/PC133 specification and who require high quality, maximum throughput and cost effectiveness in their production test systems.  In addition, the Company has continued to install its Rambusâ version of the SIGMA·3.  This system is targeted at one of the newest emerging memory technologies and operates at frequencies of over 800 MHz.  As the Rambusâ technology matures in the marketplace, the Company will continue to offer this system for its cus tomers’ expanding test capabilities.  The Company has also developed and continues to sell a version of the SIGMA·3 memory module test system with capabilities to test Double Data Rate SDRAM (“DDR”).  Another major feature of the SIGMA·3 test system is its backward compatibility to test older memory technologies such as EDO and Fast Page mode memory.

The Company differentiates its memory test systems by targeting its systems’ features specifically for the purpose of cost effective, high quality, production level testing of memory products. The Company’s memory test systems are designed for comparable performance at lower prices relative to the general-purpose test systems offered by competitors.

Flash Memory Test Systems Products

The Company markets its Flash memory test systems under the DarkHorse brand name to capitalize on existing brand awareness of its SIGMA·3 line of memory test systems.  The Company’s Flash memory test systems, the SIGMA·4™ Model 500, has been designed to provide Flash manufacturers with a scaleable, highly flexible test platform capable of testing NOR, NAND, and Serial Flash devices.  The SIGMA·4™ Model 500 has infinite expandability because of the Company’s Distributed Network Architecture ™ (“DNA”) which allows manufacturers unlimited scalability to meet their growing test capacity needs.

Customers, Sales and Marketing

In North America and Europe, a majority of the Company’s memory test systems are sold directly to semiconductor and independent memory module manufacturers.  In Asia, the Company also sells its test systems through distribution partners and independent sales representative organizations.  In fiscal 2001 and 2000, the Company’s ten largest customers accounted for 90.7% and 81.5% of net memory test system net sales, respectively.  In fiscal 2001 and 2000, the Company had one customer which accounted for 26.2% and 23.9% of the Company’s net memory test system sales, respectively.  In fiscal 1999, one customer accounted for 43.8% of the Company’s net test system sales.

Sales to distribution partners in Asia accounted for 1.6%, 11.7% and 2.7% of the Company’s net sales in fiscal 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. Sales to distribution partners are recognized as revenue by the Company upon the shipment of products because the distribution partners, like the Company’s other customers, have issued purchase orders with fixed pricing and are responsible for payment to the Company.

Backlog

Sales generally are made against standard customer purchase orders. The Company's backlog generally includes those customer orders for which it accepted purchase orders and planned shipment dates within the next year.   The Company does not consider its backlog of orders to be material to, or a significant factor in, evaluating and understanding is business.  Backlog is not an indicator of future sales, and orders in the backlog are subject to change in delivery terms or even cancellation. Accordingly, there is no assurance that current backlog will lead to future sales. The Company's total backlog of memory test systems was approximately $81,000 and $198,000 at fiscal 2001 and 2000 year end, respectively.

Competition

The memory module and memory test equipment industries are intensely competitive. These markets include a large number of established companies, several of which have achieved a substantial market share. Certain of the Company's competitors in these markets have substantially greater financial, marketing, technical, distribution and other resources, greater name recognition, and larger customer bases than the Company. In the memory module test systems market, the Company competes primarily with companies supplying automatic test equipment. The Company also faces competition from new and emerging companies that have recently entered or may in the future enter the markets in which the Company participates.

The Company expects its competitors to continue to improve the performance of their current products, to reduce their current product sales prices and to introduce new products that may offer greater performance and improved pricing, any of which could cause a decline in sales or loss of market acceptance of the Company's products. There can be no assurance that enhancements to or future generations of competitive products will not be developed that offer better prices or technical performance features than the Company's products. To remain competitive, the Company must continue to provide technologically advanced products, improve quality levels, offer flexible delivery schedules, deliver finished products on a reliable basis, reduce manufacturing costs and compete favorably on the basis of price. In addition, increased competitive pressure has led in the past, and may continue to lead to, intensified price competition, resulting in lower prices and gross margin, which could materially adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to compete successfully in the future.

Sources and Availability of Raw Material

The Company’s operations utilize a wide variety of semiconductors, electromechanical components and assemblies, and other raw materials such as sheet metal.  The Company believes that the materials and supplies necessary for the manufacture and assembly of its products are presently available in the quantities required.  The materials, supplies and product subassemblies are purchased from a substantial number of vendors.  The Company has, for a number of its products, existing alternate sources of supply, or such sources are readily available.  Portions of the Company’s manufacturing and assembly operations are dependent upon the ability of suppliers to deliver quality components and subassemblies in time to meet manufacturing, assembly, and distribution schedules.  The failure of suppliers to deliver in a timely manner may adv ersely affect the Company’s operating results until alternative sources are developed.  In addition, the Company periodically experiences constrained supply of certain component parts in some product lines as a result of strong demand in the industry for those parts.  If such constraints persist for a period of time, they may adversely affect the Company’s results of operations.  However, the Company believes that alternate suppliers could be arranged within a reasonable time so that material long-term adverse impacts would be minimized.

Research and Development

The Company's management believes that the timely development of new memory test systems and technologies is essential to maintain the Company's competitive position. In the electronics market, the Company's research and development activities are focused primarily on new memory testing technology and continual improvement in its memory test products. Additionally, the Company provides research and development services for customers either as joint or contracted development. The Company plans to continue to devote substantial research and development efforts to the design of new memory test systems that address the requirements of semiconductor companies, OEMs and independent memory module manufacturers.

The Company's research and development expenses were $2,425,061 in fiscal 2001, $2,005,052 in fiscal 2000 and $1,602,131 in fiscal 1999. A portion of the research and development expense is focused on creating a patent portfolio to protect the Company’s intellectual property and to create a competitive edge over competitors.

Intellectual Property

The Company has filed the following applications with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for patents to protect its intellectual property rights in products and technology that have been developed or are under development:

Nested Loop Method of Identifying Synchronous Memories. Issued as U.S. Patent 5,812,472 on September 22, 1998. The patent describes how to automatically identify a synchronous memory module configuration using a table-based method with nested loops.

Parametric Test System and Method.   Issued as U.S. Patent 6,008,664 on December 28, 1999.  This patent describes a method for performing a leakage test more quickly.

Contact Test Method and System for Memory Testers.  Issued as U.S. Patent 5,956,280 on September 21, 1999.  This patent describes a contact test for determining pin-to-pin and ground shorts, as well as opens for memory modules.

Synchronous Memory Tester.  Issued as U.S. Patent 5,914,902 on June 22, 1999.  This patent describes the operation of the synchronous memory tester.

Synchronous Memory Test Method.  Issued as U.S. Patent 5,912,852 on June 15, 1999.  This patent describes the method of operation of the synchronous memory tester.

Method and System for Identifying a Memory Module Configuration.   Issued as U.S. Patent 5,999,468 on December 7, 1999.  This patent application describes a speedier approach for identifying memory modules.

Synchronous Memory Test System.   Issued U.S. Patent Number 5,995,424 on November 30, 1999. This patent describes the operation of the SYNC·LC memory tester.

Capacitance Sensitive Switch and Switch Array.  Issued as U.S. Patent 5,508,700 on April 16, 1998. The patent describes a broad range of applications for capacitance sensitive touch technology covering hardware, firmware, software and methods of operations.

Capacitive Sensitive Switch Method and System.  Issued as U.S. Patent 5,933,102 on August 3, 1999.  This patent deals with simultaneous measurement of multiple touch sensors.

Synchronous Memory Identification System.  Issued as U.S. Patent 6,183,253 on January 30, 2001.Serial Number 08/895,550 filed July 1997.  This patent application describes additional applications for the use of table-based method with nested loops to automatically identify a synchronous memory module configuration.

Microsequencer for Memory Test Systems.  Serial Number 09/033,363 filed March 1998. This patent application discusses the sequencer function in the SIGMA·3 tester with emphasis on exception handling and timing set compression through use of VLIW instructions.

Programmable Pulse Generator.  Issued as U.S. Patent 6,067,648 on May 23, 2000.  This patent describes the PPG operation in the SIGMA·3 tester.

Tester Systems.  Issued as U.S. Patent 6,064,948 on May 16, 2000.  This patent describes the code generation for the SIGMA·3 tester.

Method and System for Testing RAMBUS® Memory Modules.  Issued as U.S. Patent 6,285,962 on September 4, 2001.  This patent describes a low cost method of testing RAMBUS®  memory modules.

Method and System for Timing Control in the Testing of RAMBUS® Memory Modules.  This patent application with Serial Number 09/359,173 describes the method of performing timing measurements for RAMBUS® Memory Modules.

Method and System for Distributed Testing of Electronic Devices.  This patent application with Serial Number 60/236,756 describes a method to easily increase test capacity at a low cost.

Nested Loop Method of Identifying Synchronous Memories.  Issued as Taiwanese (ROC) Patent 132190 on April 21, 2001. The patent describes how to automatically identify a synchronous memory module configuration using a table-based method with nested loops.

Synchronous Memory Test System. Issued as Taiwanese (ROC) Patent 133631 on May 16, 2001.  This patent describes the operation of the SYNC·LC memory tester.

There can be no assurance that the pending patent applications will be approved or approved in the form requested. The Company expects to continue to file patent applications where appropriate to protect its proprietary technologies; however, the Company believes that its continued success depends primarily on factors such as the technological skills and innovation of its personnel rather than on patent protection. In addition, the Company attempts to protect its intellectual property rights through trade secrets, copyrights, trademarks and a variety of other measures, including non-disclosure agreements. There can be no assurance, however, that such measures will provide adequate protection for the Company's trade secrets or other proprietary information, that disputes with respect to the ownership of its intellectual property rights will not arise, that the Company's trade secrets or proprietary technology will not otherwise become known or be independently developed by competitors or that its intellectual property rights can otherwise be protected meaningfully. There can be no assurance that patents will issue from pending or future applications or that if patents are issued, they will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented, or that rights granted thereunder will provide meaningful protection or other commercial advantage. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that third parties will not develop similar products, duplicate the Company's products or design around the patents owned by the Company or that third parties will not assert intellectual property infringement claims against the Company. In addition, there can be no assurance that foreign intellectual property laws will adequately protect the Company's intellectual property rights abroad. The failure of the Company to protect its proprietary rights could have a material adverse effect on its business, fi nancial condition and results of operations.

Employees

At September 30, 2001, the Company had 43 employees, including 27 engineering, product development, manufacturing and technical support employees, 9 finance and administration employees and 7 employees in the sales and marketing area.

Recruitment of personnel in the computer industry, particularly engineers, is highly competitive.  The Company believes that its future success will depend in part on its ability to attract and retain highly skilled management, engineering, sales, marketing, finance and technical personnel.  There can be no assurance of the Company’s ability to recruit and retain the employees that it may require.

ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES

At Sseptember 30, 2001, t1, THE he company had under lease 14,846 square feet of space for its corporate offices at 12201 Ttechnology Bboulevard, Ssuite 125, Aaustin, Ttexas.  Tthe company currently is paying annual rental of approximately $151,429 until Aapril 30, 2003, plus a pro rata charge for property taxes, common area maintenance and insurance.  

ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

None.

ITEM 4.

SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

None.

PART II.

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR THE COMPANY’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

Market Information

On May 25, 2000, the Company’s stock began trading under its current symbol of “TNIS” on the Nasdaq OTC Bulletin Board, which was established for securities that do not meet the Nasdaq SmallCap Market’s listing requirements.  Consequently, selling the Company’s common stock could be more difficult because of the smaller quantities of shares that could be bought and sold, transactions could be delayed, and security analysts’ and news media’s coverage of the Company stock could be reduced.  These factors could result in lower prices and larger spreads in the bid and ask prices for shares of the Company’s common stock.  From July 28, 1999 to May 24, 2000, the Company’s stock traded on the Nasdaq OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “TNSU.”  From May 22, 1997 to July 27, 1999, the Company’s stock traded on the Na sdaq SmallCap Market under the symbol “TNSU.”  From March 20, 1995 to June 6, 1997, the Common Stock was traded on the Vancouver Stock Exchange (“VSE”) under the symbol “TNS.U,” with prices quoted in U.S. dollars.  On June 6, 1997, the Company voluntarily delisted its stock on the VSE, as a result of the change to Nasdaq.

At the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 23, 2000, the Company’s stockholders approved a one-for-two reverse stock split of the Company’s Common Stock (the “Reverse Split”) effective May 25, 2000.  The Reverse Split had no effect on the number of authorized shares of Common Stock, preferred stock or Series A Preferred Stock.  Any stockholder otherwise entitled to any fractional share interest due to the Reverse Split received in lieu thereof, one additional share of Common Stock for the fractional share such stockholder would have been entitled to as a result of the Reverse Split.

The table below sets forth the high and low closing prices of the Common Stock from October 1, 1999 through December 17, 2001, as reported on the Nasdaq OTC Bulletin Board.  These price quotations reflect interdealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission, and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.  In addition, the  per share amounts have been retroactively adjusted for all periods presented to reflect the Reverse Split.

  Common Stock 

Quarter Ended

High

Low

Fiscal 2000:

December 31, 1999

$1.58

$0.48

March 31, 2000

  6.37

  0.51

June 30, 2000

  2.63

  0.52

September 30, 2000

  2.56

  1.00

Fiscal 2001:

December 31, 2000

  2.56

  0.55

March 31, 2001

  1.06

  0.55  

June 30, 2001

  0.55

  0.18   

September 30, 2001

  0.17

  0.05  

Fiscal 2002:

Through December 17, 2001

              0.09

               0.05

Stockholders

On September 30, 2001, there were 24,147,534 shares of Common Stock outstanding held by 159 holders of record.  The last reported sales price on the Common Stock on December 17, 2001, was $0.05 (rounded) per share.

Dividends

During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2000, the Company declared and issued dividends of 111,829 shares of Common Stock to the holders of record of its Series A Convertible Stock.  All of the Series A Convertible Stock had been converted to Common Stock as of September 30, 2000.  

In a private placement on August 13, 2001, the Company entered into a Series A Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement.  The Company recorded a dividend of 53,229 shares of its Series A Preferred Stock to the holders of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock as of September 30, 2001.  The Company has not declared or paid any dividends with respect to the Common Stock, and the current policy of the Board of Directors is to retain earnings, if any, to provide for the growth of the Company’s business. Consequently, no cash dividends are expected to be paid on the Common Stock in the foreseeable future.  Further, there can be no assurance that the proposed operations of the Company will generate the revenue and cash flow needed to declare a cash dividend or that the Company will have legally available funds to pay dividends at any time in the future.

Private Placements

On June 30, 1998, the Company entered into a Convertible Stock Purchase Agreement with an accredited investment group.  The Company issued 400 shares of its Series A Convertible Stock, for $10,000 per share, with offering costs of approximately $460,000.  The Series A Convertible Stock was convertible into the Company's no par value common stock ("Common Stock") at the option of the holder beginning 90 days after the June 30, 1998 closing date.  The conversion price was the lesser of the fixed conversion price of $4.62 per share or a variable conversion price.  The Series A Convertible Stock also provided certain mandatory redemption rights which triggered upon the occurrence of certain events.  Attached to the Series A Convertible Stock were warrants to purchase 100,000 shares of Common Stock at $6.00 per share with a term of four ye ars.  The Company believes that the sale of the Series A Convertible Stock was exempt from registration under the Securities Act by reason of Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.  The underlying Common Stock was registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under a Registration Statement on Form S-3 effective August 13, 1998; however, upon delisting of the Company’s stock from the Nasdaq SmallCap Market on July 27, 1999, the Company became ineligible to file or maintain certain registration statements.  The net proceeds from this offering were used as working capital for the Company and to make direct or indirect payments to others.

On July 27, 1999, the Company’s Common Stock was delisted from trading on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market, but is currently traded on the Nasdaq OTC Bulletin Board.  The delisting was a triggering event under the Convertible Stock Purchase Agreement, and the preferred stockholders have converted all of the Series A Stock as of September 30, 2000.  During the year ended September 30, 2000, the preferred stockholders converted 225 shares of Series A Convertible Stock for 4,672,541 shares of Common Stock.  In addition, the preferred stockholders exercised a portion of the attached warrants for 66,667 shares of Common Stock during the year ended September 30, 2000.  The remaining warrants are currently exercisable at $6.00 per share and expire on June 30, 2002.

In March 2000, the Company issued 1,528,750 shares of its Common Stock for consideration of $1,223,000.  The shares of Common Stock issued in the private placement are restricted securities (Rule 144).  The transaction was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(1) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.  Proceeds of the private placement were used for working capital.

On August 13, 2001, the Company closed a private placement financing by entering into a Series A Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement with an investment group led by New Century Equity Holdings Corp. (“New Century”) (Nasdaq: NCEH), a Delaware corporation. The Company issued 2,635,000 shares of its Series A Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred”) for $1.00 per share, with offering costs of approximately $17186,000.  New Century participated in the financing through the purchase of 1,060,000 of the above shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock.  The proceeds will be utilized to continue product development and marketing efforts and to provide working capital for the Company’s operations.

On September 28, 2001, the Company issued 7,200 shares of Series A Preferred in lieu of cash for costs relating to the offering.  

Each share of Series A Preferred is convertible into 33.334 shares of Common Stock.  The holders of the Series A Preferred will be entitled to a cumulative annual dividend of 15%, payable quarterly, which, at the option of the holders of the Series A Preferred may be paid in cash or in additional shares of Series A Preferred.  

The Company recorded a dividend of 53,229 shares of Series A Preferred Stock to the holders of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock  as of September 30, 2001.

The financing consisted of the issuance of 2,642,200 shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock including the 7,200 shares for costs related to the offering (see Note 9) and notes payable to the investors in the amount of $2,642,200 (see Note 7).

The holders of the Series A Preferred will have a liquidation preference in the event of any liquidation, sale, merger or similar event, and have registration rights and other customary rights.  The Company has also agreed to make payments to the holders of the Series A Preferred, to the extent its cash flow meets certain levels, until the holders have received the amount of their investment in the Series A Preferred and has granted a security interest in all of its assets to secure its obligation to make these payments subject to the security interest of the Company’s bank loan facility.  In addition, the Company has also agreed to issue additional shares of Series A Preferred equal to 50% of the then fully diluted Common Stock to the holders if the Company fails to return the amount of their investment, plus the mandatory dividends, by July 15, 2003.  The Company h as also agreed to issue, at up to six different times, additional shares of Series A Preferred to the investors equal to 25% of the then fully diluted Common Stock if the Company fails to meet any of certain financial targets, beginning with the quarter ended September 30, 2001 and December 31, 2001, and then for the four six-month periods ending June 30, 2002, December 31, 2002, June 30, 2003, and December 31, 2003.  On October 30, 2001, the Company issued 999,051 shares of Series A Preferred due to its failure to meet the financial targets for the quarter ended September 30, 2001 as set forth in the Series A Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement.  If the slowdown in the worldwide semiconductor industry continues for an extended period of time, the Company may not meet one or more of the remaining specified financial targets, thus triggering the issuance of additional shares of Series A Preferred. TIt appears that the Company does not expectwill not meet  to meet the specified financial targets for the quarter ended December 31, 2001.

The Company has also agreed to make payments to the holders of the Series A Preferred for the face amount of the notes payable, to the extent its cash flow meets certain levels, until the holders have been repaid $2,642,200.  The Company has also granted a security interest in all of its assets to secure its obligation to make these payments subject to the security interest of the Company’s bank loan facility. The financing consisted of the issuance of 2,642,200 shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock (see Note 9) and a note payable to the investors for the amount of their investment of $2,642,200.  The notes haves no interest, cannot be prepaid, and matures on July 13, 2003.  Repayment on the notes can only be made with payments calculated by multiplying the excess of the quarterly EBITDA over specified financial targets less quarterly capital expendit ures over $300,000 by 50%.  These calculated payments are to be paid until the debt has notes have been repaid in full. However, if the notes havedebt has  not been repaid in full on or before July 15, 2003, New Century may at its sole option require the Company to issue to the investors additional shares of Series A Preferred Stock equal to 50% of the then outstanding Common Stock, Preferred Stock, and any Common Stock equivalents on an as-if-converted and fully diluted basis. Prior to maturity, the notes shall not include any interest payable. Upon maturity, and until such time that New Century exercises the option described above, the notes shall accrue interest at 18% per annum.

The Company obtained an appraisal of the Series A Preferred and the notes payable at August 13, 2001, and allocated the proceeds of the financing to both instruments based on the valuation. The proceeds of $2,642,200 were allocated to the Series A Preferred and the notes payable in the amount of $2,465,200 and $177,000, respectively.

The beneficial conversion feature (discount) in the amount of $7,439,168, for the convertible preferred stock is limited to the proceeds allocated to the Series A Preferred in the amount of $2,465,000. Due to the Series A Preferred being immediately convertible, the $2,465,000 has been recorded as a dividend in the consolidated financial statements.

The $177,000 allocated to the notes payable to the Series A Preferred stockholders consists of the face value of $2,642,200 net of a discount on the debt of $2,465,200 to be amortized over the term of the note.  For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2001, the Company charged $168,801 of the discount on the debt to interest expense leaving a September 30, 2001 note balance, net of discount, of $345,801.

The Series A Preferred shares will vote together with the Company’s Common Stock on an as-if-converted basis and not as a separate class.  Each share of Series A Preferred will have a number of votes equal to the number of Common Stock shares then issuable upon conversion of such shares of the Series A Preferred Stock.  Upon the closing of the Purchase Agreement, the Series A Preferred stockholders had 78% of the combined eligible voting power of the outstanding Common Stock and Series A Preferred.  As of December 31, 2001, the Series A Preferred stockholders will  controlled 84% of the voting power of all stockholders of the Company.  If none of the financial targets included in the Purchase Agreement are met and the Company fails to pay the note payable to return the amount of the Series A Preferred stockholders’ investment by July 15, 2003, then, by December 31, 2003, the Series A Preferred stockholders could potentially control approximately 94% of the voting power of the Company, inclusive of all potentially dilutive options and warrants.

 At the Company’s 2002 Annual Stockholders Meeting, the shareholders will vote on a proposal to authorize additional Common Stock necessary to facilitate the conversion of the Series A Preferred.  The holders of the Series A Preferred will be entitled to vote with the holders of the Common Stock at the meeting, and will control sufficient votes to approve the proposal.  

In connection with the transaction described above, two members of the Board of Directors of the Company resigned, and New Century, by authority designated in the Purchase Agreement, appointed Mr. David P. Tusa and Mr. Justin L. Ferrero to the Board.  Subject to certain requirements, New Century has the right to appoint a third member to the Company’s current five-member Board of Directors.  New Century has informed the Company that ten days following the mailing of the Proxy Statement to the Company’s stockholders, Mr. Parris H. Holmes, Jr. intends to resign as Chairman of the Board and New Century plans to appoint Mr. C. Lee Cooke as the Company’s new Chairman of the Board.  In accordance with the Purchase Agreement, New Century has the right to maintain the majority of Board positions in the event the Board is expanded beyond its current number of five m embers.

ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The selected consolidated financial data presented below are derived from the consolidated financial statements of the Company, which for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999 have been audited by Brown, Graham and Company, P.C., independent certified public accountants.

On May 21, 1996, the Company acquired 1st Tech Corporation and Darkhorse Systems, Inc.  The acquisitions were accounted for using the purchase method, resulting in total goodwill of $7.2 million to be amortized over a two-year period.  The results of operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements since the acquisition date.  The selected consolidated financial data set forth below are qualified in their entirety by, and should be read in conjunction with, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

Overview

The following is a discussion of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999.  It should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company, the Notes thereto and other financial information included elsewhere in this report.  For purposes of the following discussion, references to year periods refer to the Company’s fiscal year ended September 30 and references to quarterly periods refer to the Company’s   fiscal quarters ended December 31, March 31, June 30 and September 30. (See “Business – Forward-Looking Statements – Cautionary Statements” included in Part I, Item 1.)

Effective May 21, 1996, the Company acquired, through mergers with its wholly owned subsidiaries, all of the outstanding common stock of 1^st Tech Corporation (“1^st Tech”) and DarkHorse Systems, Inc. (“DarkHorse”) and began operations in Austin, Texas. The consolidated group of companies began providing custom design, engineering and manufacturing services, test solutions and standard and custom semiconductor memory module products to leading original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) in the computer, networking and telecommunications industries.  In consideration for the acquisitions of 1^st   Tech and DarkHorse, the Company issued 1,475,000 and 600,000 shares, respectively, of Common Stock.  Prior, but subject to the consummation of the acquisitions of 1^st Tech and DarkHorse by the Company, 1st Tech issued 1,150,000 shares of its Common Stock for $2.00 per share in an equity financing, raising a total of approximately $2,300,000, the proceeds of which were used to reduce short-term debt and provide working capital for 1^st  Tech.

Until the fiscal year ended Sepember 30, 2000, the Company’s consolidated operations had been unprofitable since the merger with 1^st Tech and DarkHorse in May 1996.  Although the Company was able to develop increasing revenues from its memory module manufacturing business, it was not able to generate gross margins at the requisite sales volumes in order to make the business profitable.  A number of factors contributed to the Company’s inability to establish adequate profit margins.  The Company failed to achieve the projected revenues that were required to produce sufficient margin to meet the Company’s ongoing fixed costs. The Company also failed to win, and on occasion lost, the business of several large customers due to the Company’s weak financial condition, which caused potential customers to be concerned about the Com pany’s ability to deliver.  Additionally, the Company often faced an unpredictable cost structure due to uncertainties regarding inventory costs.  The market for Dynamic Random Access Memory (“DRAM”) chips, the principal component in semiconductor memory modules, became highly volatile at various times in terms of pricing and inventory availability.  Many of the Company’s competitors had greater financial resources and were able to obtain more advantageous prices, as well as secure allocations of DRAM during high demand periods.  The Company was, at times, forced to pay top market prices to procure DRAM, which in turn caused margin problems. Further, the Company’s customers generally were on a single-order basis with no long-term commitments or ability to adjust pricing as to outstanding orders.

A shortage of computer memory chips in the fourth fiscal quarter of fiscal 1999 and a rapid increase in memory chip prices during the same period severely disrupted the Company’s business, resulting in major shortfalls of revenue.  After dropping by approximately 95% from 1996 to mid-1999, memory chip prices escalated rapidly in August and September 1999, quadrupling between July and September 1999, before leveling off in October 1999.  During this time period of 1999, the Company had great difficulties in obtaining DRAM inventory and lost several key orders.  Additionally, one of the Company’s largest customers (comprising approximately 20% of Company sales in fiscal 1999) was acquired, in April 1999, by another semiconductor manufacturer and ceased doing business with the Company.

In July 1999, the Company’s stock was delisted from the Nasdaq SmallCap Market for failure to meet Nasdaq’s $2,000,000 net tangible assets requirement.  Delisting of the Company’s stock placed the Company in default under the Convertible Stock Purchase Agreement entered into with KA Investments LLC  (“KA”) dated June 30, 1998, pursuant to which KA purchased 400 shares of 5% Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series A Convertible Stock”) of the Company for $4,000,000.  Under the terms of the Convertible Stock Purchase Agreement, the Series A Convertible Stock was convertible into Common Stock based on a formula set forth in the Agreement and quarterly dividends were payable in Common Stock or cash.  The shares of Common Stock issuable under the Convertible Stock Purchase Agreement were registered under a Registr ation Statement on Form S-3.  Upon delisting of the Company’s stock from the Nasdaq SmallCap Market on July 27, 1999, the Company’s S-3 was no longer effective.  Delisting also constituted a triggering event for redemption of the Series A Convertible Stock.  As of September 30, 2000, the holder of the Series A Convertible Stock had converted all of its Series A Convertible Stock for 5,440,140 shares of Common Stock.

On October 15, 1999, the Company hired an investment bank to assist in addressing alternatives to improve the overall posture of the Company and bolster stockholder value. The Company’s memory module manufacturing business was experiencing excessive losses, prohibiting the Company’s ability to attract needed financing.  In consultation with the investment bank, the Company evaluated selling the memory module manufacturing business and retaining its other operations.

Although a number of alternatives, including Chapter 7 liquidation, were considered by the Board of Directors, the best alternative was considered to be the sale of the memory module manufacturing business.  On December 9, 1999, the Company entered into a definitive asset purchase agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) with All Components, Inc. (“ACI”). The Asset Purchase Agreement related to the sale of certain assets and business ccomproising the Company’s memory module manufacturing business to an affiliate of ACI, Tanisys Operations, LP, as well as the sale of the stock of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Tanisys (Europe) Ltd. (the “Sale Transaction”).  In addition, the Company entered into a covenant not to compete for ten years after the closing of the Sale Transaction, as further described below.

In connection with the disposal of the memory module manufacturing business, the Company incurred a loss of $3,319,147 during the year ended September 30, 1999.  The components of the loss include the following: total consideration from the buyer was $2,264,907, which included $360,000 in cash proceeds and $1,904,907 in assumed liabilities; the Company sold assets with a book value of $2,786,344, which included fixed assets of $666,164, accounts receivable of $1,077,104 and inventory of $1,043,076; and, in connection with and as a condition to closing the Sale Transaction, the Company was able to negotiate a reduction in the aggregate amount payable to the Company’s creditors by $1,677,678.  The loss on the Sale Transaction was effectively reduced by this debt forgiveness.  The stock of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Tanisys (Europe) Ltd., which carried a book value of $1,214,187, was sold to the buyer.

The Company incurred additional expenses, which have been paid, in connection with the Sale Transaction including the following: fixed assets of the memory module manufacturing business totaling $1,136,869 were written off, stock and warrants valued at $98,091 were issued to creditors in satisfaction of amounts owed, expenses to terminate various lease obligations in the amount of $109,000 were incurred, $327,364 in inventory and $64,710 in deferred financing costs were written off, $128,604 was paid to the Company’s principal lender to terminate its line of credit,  professional fees were paid in the amount of $85,572, and a variety of additional miscellaneous costs totaling $71,091 were paid.

During the years ended September 30, 2001 and 2000, the Company paid $565,821 and $1,654,694 for costs that were accrued as of September 30, 1999, and that related to the discontinued operations, including lease termination costs for capital equipment, professional fees, proxy costs, warranty costs and other related costs.  At September 30, 2001, remaining accrued expenses of $320,909 have been classified as net current liabilities of discontinued operations and $57,251 has been classified as net noncurrent  liabilities of discontinued operations on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

The results of the memory module manufacturing business have been classified as discontinued operations, and prior periods have been restated to reflect the sale.  The loss on the sale, as well as the costs associated with the disposition of the memory module manufacturing business, have been recorded in the consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 1999.

Since consummating the Sale Transaction in December 1999, the Company has refocused all of its efforts on the memory test systems business.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth certain consolidated financial data of the Company expressed as a percentage of net sales for the years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999:

Net Sales

Net sales consist of production-level automated test equipment along with related hardware and software, less returns and discounts. The worldwide semiconductor slowdown that occurred during the Company’s fiscal year ended September 30, 2001 impacted net sales resulting in a decrease of 44% to $5,206,153 for fiscal 2001 from $9,300,530 in fiscal 2000.  The Company’s customers depend upon current and anticipated market demand for semiconductors and products that utilize semiconductors.  The industry slowdown has resulted in significantly lower levels of capital expenditures for semiconductor equipment, such as the Company’s automated test equipment.  We do not believe that orders for the Company’s test systems were lost to competition, but instead have been delayed.  In the meantime, the Company continues to enhance and broaden its product line to support all memory technologies in order to deliver high quality, cost effective, high-speed test systems to its customers as the economy recovers.

Net sales for fiscal 2000 of $9,300,530 decreased 8% from $10,145,108 in fiscal 1999.  There were two primary reasons for the decline in net sales.  First, the Company’s  SIGMA·3 test system, launched in fiscal 1999, was widely accepted in the market place.  Second, the industry struggled over which memory technology to embrace for the future: SDRAM PC 133, Rambus® memory or DDR.  While the Company has developed test systems for all three technologies, demand was somewhat slowed in 2000 as customers struggled in their decisions to commit to one or more of the technologies.

Cost of Sales and Gross Profit

Cost of sales includes the costs of all components and materials purchased for the manufacture of products, direct labor and related overhead costs.  Gross profit for fiscal 2001 was $2,530,408 as compared to $6,122,056 from the prior year.  As a percent of sales, gross profit was 49% in fiscal 2001, down from 66% in fiscal 2000.  The decreases in both dollars and percent of sales were due to the mix of products sold and lower sales volume in fiscal 2001 resulting in reduced absorption of fixed manufacturing costs.

In fiscal 2000, gross profit was $6,122,056 up from $5,632,506 in fiscal 1999.  Gross profit margin increased in fiscal 2000 to 66% from 56% in fiscal 1999 as a result of improved purchasing practices which brought about more favorable raw material prices, and the Company managed to lower manufacturing costs.

Research and Development

Research and development expenses, which include all costs associated with the engineering design and testing of new technologies and products were $2,425,061 in fiscal 2001, up 21% from the prior year’s $2,005,052.  The higher costs reflect the ongoing development of test systems for both DDR and Flash memory technologies, enhancement of a distributed-networking architecture that can be applied to all memory technologies and continuing efforts to broaden product lines and capabilities.  Costs are expected to decrease slightly in absolute dollars and decrease as a percent of sales as revenue grows.

Research and development expenses increased 25% to $2,005,052 in fiscal 2000 from $1,602,131 in fiscal 1999.  A combination of the development of test systems for Rambus memory, DDR sync DRAM and Flash memory, plus the development of the multi-site feature for the SIGMA·3 system are the main reasons for the increased cost.

Sales and Marketing

Sales and marketing expenses include compensation of sales and marketing employees and independent sales personnel, as well as the costs of advertising, promotions, trade shows, travel, direct support and related overhead.  Expenses of  $1,324,401 in fiscal 2001 were down nearly 4% from $1,374,386 in fiscal 2000.  The Company continues to market its test systems to the world’s largest semiconductor and memory module manufacturers.  Sales and marketing expenses are expected to increase modestly in terms of dollars, but decrease as a percent of sales in future periods as revenue grows.

In fiscal year 2000, sales and marketing expenses decreased 11% to $1,374,386 from fiscal 1999 $1,537,717.  Higher costs in 1999 reflect aggressive marketing efforts promoting the SIGMA·3 test system.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel costs, including employee compensation and benefits, and support costs including utilities, insurance, professional fees and all costs associated with a reporting company.  In fiscal years 2001 and 2000, general and administrative expenses decreased to $706,7167 from $776,684. General and administrative expenses expressed as a percentage of revenues were 13.5% and 8.4% in fiscal years 2001 and 2000, respectively.  The decrease in absolute dollars is the result of cost saving measures taken including personnel reductions in 2001.  The increase when expressed as a percentage of sales was a result of the lower sales volume in fiscal 2001.  Expenses are expected to decrease in both absolute dollars and as a percent of sales as revenue grows.

In fiscal year 2000, general and administrative expenses increased to $776,684 from $703,900 in fiscal 1999, a 10.3% increase.  General and administrative expenses expressed as a percentage of revenues were 8.4% and 6.9% in fiscal years 2000 and 1999, respectively. The increase in actual funds expended in fiscal 1999 was due primarily to normal cost increases associated with personnel and other administrative costs.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization includes the depreciation for all fixed assets, exclusive of those used in the manufacturing process and included as part of “Cost of Goods Sold,” and the amortization of intangibles, including patents related to memory module test systems technology.  Depreciation and amortization increased to $145,259 in fiscal 2001 from $62,099 in fiscal 2000.   The increase reflects investment in new software and hardware tools designed to maximize the efficiency of engineering and research.  Depreciation and amortization is expected to remain relatively flat in terms of absolute dollars and decrease as a percentage of sales as revenue  grows.

Depreciation and amortization decreased to $62,099 in fiscal 2000 from $155,466 in fiscal 1999, due to the decline of the remaining asset balances.  

Bad Debt Expense

Bad debt expense consists of amounts charged to expense because of trade accounts receivable becoming uncollectible.  The Company’s method of accounting for bad debts is to use historical actual expenses to estimate the amount of current sales that may be uncollectible and to provide for them by creating an allowance that is netted against the trade accounts receivable. The Company writes off amounts related to specific accounts as the collection of these accounts becomes questionable. For fiscal 2001, the amount charged to bad debt expense was $18,930 compared to $14,292 for fiscal 2000 and $233,196 for fiscal year 1999.

Other Income (Expense), Net

Other income (expense), net consists primarily of interest income less interest expense, plus other miscellaneous income and expenses. Interest expense of $86,336 was attributable to borrowings from a revolving credit note made to fund short-term inventory requirements and accounts receivable and interest resulting from capital leases.  Interest expense of $168,801 resulted from the amortization of the discount related to the note payable to the Series A Preferred stockholders.  Interest income relates to the investment of available cash in short-term interest bearing accounts and cash equivalent securities.  Other income (expense) decreased to $271,036 of expense in fiscal 2001 from $260,943 of income in fiscal 2000.  For fiscal 2001, other income (expense) included $255,137 of interest expense, $25,373 of interest income, $35,646 of property and state tax expense, and $5,626 of miscellaneous expenses.   

The non-recurring miscellaneous income for the year ended September 30, 2000 included $166,582 of income from the forgiveness of debt by some of the Company’s vendors.  In addition, the Company also had $280,000 of non-recurring miscellaneous income which included $100,000 from reserves for accounts receivable and $180,000 from reserves for inventory that were deemed excessive after analytical and reasonableness reviews.  These reserves were initially established due to the uncertainty in the collection of receivables and the inventory mix in anticipation of customer response to the sale of the memory module manufacturing business disclosed in the financial statements as discontinued operations.

At the date of the sale of the memory module manufacturing business in December 1999, the Company had accounts receivable from certain customers related to both the continuing and discontinued operations.  The Company had some concerns as to whether or not some of these customers would pay for the continuing operations accounts receivable due to the “going concern” opinion issued by the independent auditor.  In addition, some of the receivables were aging beyond reasonable terms.  The result was that an accounting estimate was made to reflect these potential collection issues.  

By the end of the Company’s fiscal year ended September 30, 2000, the potential collection issues had all been resolved resulting in excess reserves for accounts receivable based on historical bad debt analysis and information available at the time relating to the collectability of the receivables. The Company first applied the reversal of these reserves to bad debt expense.  However, the reserve exceeded bad debt expense and, therefore, the excess was recorded as non-recurring miscellaneous income.  The Company estimates bad debt on a percentage-of-sales adjusted accordingly based on historical analysis of actual bad debts incurred.

The Company’s policy concerning inventory impairment charges is to establish a new, reduced cost basis for the affected inventory that remains until the inventory is sold or disposed.  If subsequent to the date of impairment it is determined that the impairment charges are recoverable, the Company does not increase the carrying amountscosts  of the affected inventory and corresponding income.

After the sale of the memory module manufacturing business, inventory remained that had been utilized in both the continuing and discontinued operations.  While the inventory items had not been impaired as of the date of the sale of the discontinued operations, the Company did not know if it could utilize all of the inventory before it became obsolete.  Therefore, the Company made an estimate based on the best information available at the time as to the potential exposure due to excess inventory.  Accordingly, an inventory reserve was established to account for this estimate.  By the end of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2000, the Company was able to successfully utilize almost all of the inventory in products that were sold and reduced the cost basis of impaired inventory items by charging the impairment costs to the inventory reserve.  The remaining exces s inventory reserve was then recorded as non-recurring miscellaneous income.

Other income (expense) for fiscal year 2000 increased to $260,943 of income, as discussed above, compared to $356,774 of expense in fiscal 1999.  The $356,774 of expense in fiscal 1999 included $371,514 of interest expense, $13,675 of interest income, and $1,065 of miscellaneous  incomeexpenses.  

Provision for Income Taxes

For the years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999, the Company incurred consolidated net operating losses for U.S. income tax purposes of approximately $2,321,000X,XXX,XXX,, $2,5751,351,000 and $2,570,000 and for non-U.S. income tax purposes of approximately $0,XXX,XXX, $426,000 and $817,000, respectively.  The tax loss carry-forwards of approximately $262,092548,000 at September 30, 20010, begin to expire in 2011.  At September 30, 2001 and 2000, the Company had temporary differences resulting in future tax (income) deductions of approximately $(40X,XXX,XXX,000)  and $1,430,000, respectively, principally representing differences in accounting and tax basis in accrued liabilities, reserves, depreciation, and anticipated loss from discontinued operations.  Deferred income tax assets from the loss carry-forwards and asset basis differences aggregate approximately $ 8,871,000X,XXX,XXX  and $8,343,000, at September 30, 2001, and 2000, respectively.

For financial reporting purposes, valuation allowances of $X8,871,XXX,000XXX  and $8,343,000 at September 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively, have been recorded to offset the deferred tax assets due to the uncertainty as to whether the benefits will be realized.

The Company was unable to use the tax losses generated during the current and prior years.  TheThe  availability of the net operating tax loss carry-forwards and future tax deductions to reduce taxable income is subject to various limitations under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), in the event of an ownership change as defined in Section 382 of the Code.  The Company may lose the benefit of such net operating loss carry-forwards due to Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) Code Section 382 limitations.  This section states that after reorganization or other change in corporate ownership, the use of certain carry-forwards may be limited or prohibited.  The Company believes that the limitations under IRS Code Section 382 limitation did not exist as of September 30, 20010, butand  if triggered, the consequence is expec ted to have no material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Since inception the Company has utilized the funds acquired in equity financings of its Common Stock, preferred stock, exercise of warrants, exercise of stock options, vendor credits, certain bank borrowings and funds generated from operations to support its operations, carry on research and development activities, acquire capital equipment, finance inventories and accounts receivable and pay its general and administrative expenses. For fiscal 2001, the Company generated net cash from financing activities of $1,82092,885399  versus using net cash from financing activities of $41,287 in fiscal 2000. The increase of $1,862933,172686 in fiscal 2001 consisted primarily of proceeds $2,575,000  from Series A Preferred Stock sales of $2,353,000 and related debt less , offering costs paid on the Series A Preferred Stock transaction of $17086,877059, repayments of $2, 740,757 on revolving credit, borrowings on revolving credit of $2,229,213, and an increase of  $22,642payments on capital lease obligations of $19,054..  At September 30, 2001, the Company had $1,369,988 of cash and working capital of $1,9691,948766.

As of September 30, 2001, the Company had a bank line of credit of $2,000,000 which expires on May 29, 2002, at which time the Company believes the credit facility will be renewed.  At September 30, 2001, there was $1,911,544 of unused credit with this bank credit facility.  Certain financial covenants exists under this bank credit line which were not met as of September 30, 2001.  The Company has requested a waiver of bank has waived the financial covenants defaults  and the Company believes the credit facility will remain in effect until the expiration date of May 29, 2002.  However, there is no guarantee that the bank will waive any future failure by the Company to meet the financial covenants.

On August 13, 2001, the Company closed a private placement financing by entering into a Series A Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement with an investment group led by New Century Equity Holdings Corp. (“New Century”) (Nasdaq: NCEH), a Delaware corporation. The Company issued 2,635,000 shares of its Series A Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred”) for $1.00 per share, with offering costs of approximately $17186,,000.  As part of the issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock, the Company additionally issued a note payable of $2,642,200 to the Series A Preferred stockholders.  New Century participated in the financing through the purchase of 1,060,000 of the above shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock.  The proceeds will be utilized to continue product development and marketing efforts and to provide working capital for the Co mpany’s operations.

In March 2000, the Company issued 1,528,750 shares of its Common Stock in a private placement for consideration of $1,223,000.  The shares of Common Stock issued in the private placement are restricted securities.  The transaction was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(1) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.  Proceeds of the private placement are being used for working capital.

On November 2, 1998, the Company completed a private placement of $2,000,000 of debt with warrants.  During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2000, the holders of the debt elected to convert all of the debt into 4,000,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock pursuant to an offer made by the Company.  Interest was accrued on the notes through January 31, 2000 and the Company issued 168,950 shares of the Company’s Common Stock during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2000, for interest totaling $119,444.

Capital expenditures totaled $190232,633329 and $170,876 in fiscal 2001 and 2000, respectively. These capital expenditures were primarily for the purchase of test equipment, expansion of engineering facilities and upgrades to enterprise information systems.

The Company believes that its existing funds, anticipated cash flows from operations, amounts available from future vendor credits, bank borrowings, capital and operating leases and equity financings will be sufficient to meet its working capital and capital expenditure needs for the next twelve months at the projected level of operations.  However, should there be a significant increase in sales above projected levels requiring additional investments in equipment, inventory and accounts receivable, the Company may be required to obtain additional funding through debt or rely upon a future equity offering or offerings for such funding.  There is no assurance that the Company would be able to locate debt funding or that it would be successful in its attempts to raise a sufficient amount of funds in an equity offering or offerings. The Company’s pot ential inability to raise needed funds to meet its projected level of operations or increase above current projections could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

In addition, the Company believes that its working capital, capital expenditures and research and development requirements for the long term will be funded through cash generated from operations and lines of credit.  However, the Company may require or choose to obtain additional debt or equity financing in the future.  The Company cannot assure that additional financing, if needed, will be available on favorable terms.

International Sales

International sales accounted for 44.0%, 44.6% and 31.9% of net sales in fiscal 2001, 2000, and 1999 respectively. The Company is subject to the risks associated with the imposition of legislation and regulations relating to the import or export of high technology products. The Company cannot predict whether quotas, duties, taxes or other charges or restrictions upon the importation or exportation of the Company's products will be implemented by the U.S. or other countries. Because sales of the Company's products have been denominated to date in U.S. dollars, increases in the value of the U.S. dollar could increase the price of the Company's products so that they become relatively more expensive to customers in the local currency of a particular country, leading to a reduction in sales and profitability in that country. Some of the Company's customer purchase orders and agreements are g overned by foreign laws, which may differ significantly from U.S. laws. Therefore, the Company may be limited in its ability to enforce its rights under such agreements and to collect damages, if awarded. There can be no assurance that any of these factors will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.

Significant Customer Concentration          

In North America and Europe a majority of the Company’s memory module test systems are sold directly to semiconductor and independent memory module manufacturers.  In Asia, the Company also sells its test systems through distribution partners and independent sales representative organizations.  In fiscal 2001 and 2000, the Company’s ten largest customers accounted for 90.7% and 81.5% of net memory module test system sales, respectively.  The top customers in each of 2001, 2000, and 1999 accounted for 26.2%, 23.9%, and 43.8% of total test system sales, respectively.

The Company, in general, has no firm long-term volume commitments from its customers and generally enters into individual purchase orders and agreements with non-binding forecasts. Customer purchase orders and forecasts are subject to change, cancellation or delay with little or no consequence to the customer. The replacement of canceled, delayed or reduced purchase orders with new business cannot be assured. The Company's business, financial condition and results of operations will depend significantly on its ability to obtain purchase orders from existing and new customers, upon the financial condition and success of its customers, the success of customers’ products and the general economy. Factors affecting the industries of the Company's major customers could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.

No Assurance of Product Quality, Performance and Reliability

The Company expects that its customers will continue to establish demanding specifications for quality, performance, reliability and delivery.  To date, the Company has not experienced any significant quality problems that have affected its results of operations, and any known quality problems have been or are in the process of being remedied. There can be no assurance that the problems will not occur in the future with respect to quality, performance, reliability and delivery of the Company's products. If such problems occur, the Company could experience increased costs, delays in or cancellations or rescheduling of orders or shipments, delays in collecting accounts receivable and increases in product returns and discounts, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.

Product Concentration; Dependence on Memory Market

The market for semiconductor memory has been cyclical. The industry has experienced significant economic downturns at various times, characterized by diminished product demand, accelerated erosion of average selling prices and production overcapacity.  During fiscal 2000, there were significant declines as well as increases in DRAM and SRAM semiconductor prices and demand. Since the Company’s test systems are sold into the semiconductor and memory module market, future price changes could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.

Fluctuations in Operating Results

The Company's results of operations and gross margin have fluctuated significantly from period to period in the past and may in the future continue to fluctuate significantly from period to period. The primary factors that have affected and may in the future affect the Company's results of operations include the loss of a principal customer or customers or the reduction in orders from a customer. Other factors that may affect the Company's results of operations in the future include fluctuating market demand for and changes in the selling prices of the Company's products, market acceptance of new products and enhanced versions of the Company's products, delays in the introduction of new products and enhancements to existing products, and manufacturing inefficiencies associated with the startup of new product introductions. In addition, the Company's operating results may be affected by the timing of new product announcements and releases by the Company or its competitors; the timing of significant orders; the ability to produce products in volume; delays, cancellations or rescheduling of orders due to customer financial difficulties or other events; inventory obsolescence, including the reduction in value of the Company's inventories due to unexpected price declines and unexpected product returns; the timing of expenditures in anticipation of increased sales; cyclicality in the Company's targeted markets; and expenses associated with acquisitions.

Sales of the Company's individual products and product lines toward the end of a product's life cycle typically are characterized by steep declines in sales, pricing and gross margin, the precise timing of which may be difficult to predict. The Company could experience unexpected reductions in sales of products as customers anticipate new product purchases. In addition, to the extent that the Company manufactures products in anticipation of future demand that does not materialize, or in the event a customer cancels outstanding orders during a period of either declining product selling prices or decreasing demand, the Company could experience an unanticipated decrease in sales of products. These factors could give rise to charges for obsolete or excess inventory, return of products or discounts.  In the past, the Company has had to write-down and write-off excess or obsolete invento ry. To the extent that the Company is unsuccessful in managing product transitions, its business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

The need for continued significant expenditures for research and development and ongoing customer service and support, among other factors, will make it difficult for the Company to reduce its operating expenses in any particular period if the Company's expectations for net sales for that period are not met. The Company believes that period-to-period comparisons of the Company's financial results are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as indications of future performance.

Dependence on Semiconductor, Computer, Telecommunications and Networking Industries

Demand for the Company’s line of memory module test systems is driven by the increased demand for higher level memory module technology in semiconductor, computer, telecommunications and networking industries. The Company may experience substantial period-to-period fluctuations in future operating results due to factors affecting the semiconductor, computer, telecommunications and networking industries. From time to time, each of these industries has experienced downturns, often in connection with, or in anticipation of, declines in general economic conditions. A decline or significant shortfall in growth in any one of these industries could have a material adverse impact on the demand for the Company's products and therefore a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. There can be no assurance that the Compa ny's net sales and results of operations will not be materially and adversely affected in the future due to changes in demand from individual customers or cyclical changes in the semiconductor, computer, telecommunications, networking or other industries utilizing the Company's products.

History of Losses; Uncertain Profitability

The Company historically experienced operating losses until the fiscal year ended September 30, 2000 in which it had an operating profit of $2,150,486. However, due to the economic slowdown in the worldwide semiconductor industry, the Company recorded an operating loss for the year ended September 30, 2001 of $2,360,995.  At September 30, 2001,  the Company had an accumulated deficit of approximately $42,1312,976046.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, which contemplates continuation of the Company as a going concern.  Numerous factors could affect the Company’s operating results, including, but not limited to, general economic conditions, competition, and changing technologies.  A change in any of these factors could have an adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations. The Company had to raise additional capital in order to continue its operations in fiscal 2001, resulting in the issuance of Series A Preferred Stock and related debt (See Notes 7 and 9).  The current economic slowdown continues in the worldwide semiconductor industry resulting in concern over the sustainability of the Company’s revenues and its abi lity to attract additional capital if needed.

In view of these matters, realization of a major portion of the assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet is dependent upon continued operations of the Company, which in turn may be dependent upon the success of its future operations.  Management believes that the Company’s reputation in the marketplace and its well respected product line will help generate revenues during the remainder of the economic downturn.  These revenues will result in a certain level of cash flow which, when coupled with the Company’s current cash position, will provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern.   

There can be no assurance that the Company will not incur losses in the future or that the Company will be able to raise cash as necessary to fund operations.

Future Additional Capital Requirements; No Assurance Future Capital will be Available

The Company's capital requirements will depend on numerous factors, including market acceptance and demand for its products; the resources the Company devotes to the development, manufacture and marketing of its products; the progress of the Company's product development programs; the resources required to protect the Company's intellectual property; the resources expended, if any, to acquire complementary businesses, products and technologies; and other factors.  The timing and amount of such capital requirements cannot be accurately predicted.  Funds also may be used for the acquisition of businesses, products and technologies that are complementary to those marketed by the Company.  Consequently, although the Company believes that its revenues and other sources of liquidity will provide adequate funding for its capital requirements through at least 2001, the Company ma y be required to raise additional funds through public or private financings, collaborative relationships or other arrangements.  There can be no assurance that the Company will not require additional funding or that such additional funding, if needed, will be available on terms attractive to the Company or at all.  Any additional equity financings may be dilutive to stockholders, and debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants. Such adjustments may be dilutive to stockholders and may inhibit the Company’s ability to consummate additional equity financings.

Management of Growth; Expansion of Operations

In order to continue to provide quality products and customer service and to meet anticipated demands of its customers, the Company will be required to continue to increase staffing and other expenses, including expenditures on research and development, sales and marketing. Should the Company increase its expenditures in anticipation of a future level of sales that does not materialize, the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected. In order to achieve anticipated sales levels and profitability, the Company will continue to be required to manage its assets and operations efficiently.

Rapid Technological Change

The semiconductor, computer, telecommunications and networking industries are subject to rapid technological change, short product life cycles, frequent new product introductions and enhancements, changes in end-user requirements and evolving industry standards. The Company's ability to be competitive in these markets will depend in significant part upon its ability to invest significant amounts of resources for research and development efforts, to successfully develop, introduce and sell new products and enhancements on a timely and cost-effective basis and to respond to changing customer requirements that meet evolving industry standards. For example, the semiconductor memory market transitioned from Fast Page mode and EDO memory to SDRAM over a two to three-year period.  Other transitions from SDRAM to Rambusâ and DDR SDRAM continued to occur in 2001 and will continue into 2002. The success of the Company in developing new and enhanced products will depend upon a variety of factors, including integration of the various elements of its complex technology; timely and efficient completion of product design; timely and efficient implementation of manufacturing, assembly and test processes; and product performance, quality and reliability. The Company has experienced, and may in the future experience, delays from time to time in the development and introduction of new products. Moreover, there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in selecting, developing, manufacturing and marketing new products or enhancements. There can be no assurance that defects or errors will not be found in the Company's products after commencement of commercial shipments, which could result in delayed market acceptance of such products. The inability of the Company to introduce new products or enhancements that contribute to sales could have a material adverse effect on the Company's busi ness, financial condition and results of operations.

Dependence on Sole or Limited Sources of Supply

The Company is dependent on certain limited or sole source suppliers to provide key, and in some cases, custom components used in the Company’s memory module test systems. The Company has experienced and may continue to experience delays in component deliveries and quality problems with respect to certain component deliveries, which have caused and could in the future cause delays in product shipments and have required and could in the future require the redesign of certain products. The Company generally has no written agreements with its suppliers. There can be no assurance that the Company will receive adequate component supplies on a timely basis in the future. The inability to continue to obtain sufficient supplies of components as required, or to develop alternative sources if required, could cause delays, disruptions or reductions in product shipments or require product rede signs which could damage relationships with current or prospective customers, could increase costs and/or prices and could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.

Dependence on Key Personnel

The Company's future operating results depend in a significant part upon the continued contributions of its key technical and senior management personnel, many of whom would be difficult to replace. The Company's future operating results also depend in significant part upon its ability to attract, train and retain qualified management, manufacturing and quality assurance, engineering, marketing, sales and support personnel. However, competition for such personnel is intense, and there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in attracting, training or retaining such personnel now or in the future. There may be only a limited number of persons with the requisite skills to serve in these positions, and it may be increasingly difficult for the Company to hire such persons over time. The loss of any key employee, the failure of any key employee to perform in his or her curren t position, the Company's inability to attract, train and retain skilled employees as needed or the inability of the officers and key employees of the Company to expand, train and manage the Company's employee base could materially and adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.

Dependence on Availability, Recruitment and Retention of Technical Personnel

The Company depends upon its ability to attract, hire and retain technical personnel who possess the skills and experience necessary to meet the Company’s own personnel needs and the technical requirements of its clients.  Competition for individuals with proven technical skills remains strong, although it has become less intense over the last year.  The computer industry has historically experienced a high rate of attrition of such personnel.  The Company competes for such individuals with competitors, providers of outsourcing services, temporary personnel agencies, computer systems consultants, customers and potential customers. Failure to attract and retain sufficient technical personnel would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition.

Limited Operating History

Although the Company has been in existence since 1984, its current operations have been in place only since its acquisition of DarkHorse in 1996.  Accordingly, the Company is still in many respects subject to certain risks and uncertainties inherent in a new enterprise, including limited capital and other resources, reliance on key personnel, operating in a highly competitive environment, inability to develop long-term relationships with its customers, suppliers and lenders, lack of name recognition, higher overhead costs, and difficulty in addressing unanticipated problems, delays and expenses.

Uncertainty Regarding Protection of Proprietary Rights

In the semiconductor, computer, telecommunications and networking industries, it is typical for companies to receive notices from time to time alleging infringement of patents, copyrights or other intellectual property rights of others. While there is currently no pending intellectual property litigation involving the Company, the Company may from time to time be notified of claims that it may be infringing patents, copyrights or other intellectual property rights owned by third parties. There can be no assurance that third parties will not in the future pursue claims against the Company with respect to the alleged infringement of patents, copyrights or other intellectual property rights. In addition, litigation may be necessary to protect the Company's intellectual property rights and trade secrets, to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others or to defend ag ainst third party claims of invalidity. Any litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.

There can be no assurance that infringement, invalidity, right to use or ownership claims by third parties or claims for indemnification resulting from infringement claims will not be asserted in the future. The failure to obtain a license under a patent or intellectual property right from a third party for technology used by the Company could cause the Company to incur substantial liabilities and to suspend the manufacture of the products utilizing the intellectual property. In addition, should the Company decide to litigate such claims, such litigation could be extremely expensive and time consuming and could materially and adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations, regardless of the outcome of the litigation.

The Company attempts to protect its intellectual property rights through a variety of measures, including non-disclosure agreements, trademarks, trade secrets, patents and copyrights. There can be no assurance, however, that such measures will provide adequate protection for the Company's trade secrets or other proprietary information, that disputes with respect to the ownership of its intellectual property rights will not arise, that the Company's trade secrets or proprietary technology will not otherwise become known or be independently developed by competitors or that the Company can otherwise meaningfully protect its intellectual property rights.

Effects of Delisting from Nasdaq SmallCap Market; Lack of Liquidity of Low Priced Stocks

In July 1999, the Company’s stock was delisted from trading on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market, and on July 28, 1999, the Company’s stock began trading on the Nasdaq OTC Bulletin Board, which was established for securities that do not meet the Nasdaq SmallCap Market’s listing requirements.  Consequently, buying or selling the Company’s Common Stock could be more difficult because of the smaller quantities of shares that could be bought and sold, transactions could be delayed, and security analysts’ and news media’s coverage of the Company stock could be reduced.  These factors could result in lower prices and larger spreads in the bid and ask prices for shares of the Company’s Common Stock.

In addition to delisting, trading in the Common Stock also is subject to the requirements of certain rules promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which require additional disclosures by broker-dealers in connection with any trades involving a stock defined as a penny stock.  Such rules require the delivery, prior to any penny stock transaction, of a disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and the risks associated therewith, and impose various sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell penny stock to persons other than established customers and accredited investors (which are generally institutions).  For these types of transactions, the broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchase and have received the purchaser's written consent to the transaction prior to the sale.  The additional burd ens imposed upon broker-dealers by such requirements may discourage broker-dealers from effecting transactions in the Common Stock, which could severely limit the market liquidity of the Common Stock and the ability of stockholders to sell their shares of Common Stock in the secondary market.

Environmental Regulation

The Company's operations and manufacturing processes are subject to certain federal, state, local and foreign environmental protection laws and regulations. Public attention has increasingly been focused on the environmental impact of manufacturing operations that use hazardous materials or generate hazardous wastes, and environmental laws and regulations may become more stringent over time. There can be no assurance that failure to comply with either present or future regulations, or to obtain all necessary permits required under such regulations, would not subject the Company to significant compliance expenses, production suspensions or delay, restrictions on expansion at its present or future locations, the acquisition of costly equipment or other liabilities.

ITEM 7A.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

The Company does not believe that there is any material market risk exposure with respect to derivative or other financial instruments., which would require disclosure under this item.

ITEM 8.       FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

The consolidated financial statements of the Company and the related report of the Company’s independent public accountants thereon are included in this report at the pages indicated.

Consolidated Financial Statements at September 30, 2001 and 2000

and for the Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999:

        Reports of Independent Public Accountants.............………………………………………………...

 3126

        Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2001 and 2000.....................………………………

 3228

        Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended September 30, 2001,

2000 and 1999………………………………………………………………..…...….........…….

 3329

        Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended

September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999…………………………………………………….……...

 340

        Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended September 30,

2001, 2000 and 1999………………………………………………………………..…......…….

 351

        Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.………………………………………………….…

 362

#

#

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To Tanisys Technology, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Tanisys Technology, Inc. (a Wyoming corporation), and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended.  The consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Tanisys Technology, Inc., and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2001 and 2000, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ Brown, Graham and Company P.C.

Austin, Texas

November 16, 2001

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To Tanisys Technology, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Tanisys Technology, Inc. (a Wyoming corporation), and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999.  The consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America.  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Tanisys Technology, Inc., and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2001 and 2000, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole.  Schedule II is presented for the purpose of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements.  Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.  As shown in the financial statements, the Company has incurred net losses of $2,360,995 and $8,966,728 for the years ended September 30, 2001 and 1999, respectively. These factors, and others discussed in Note 1, raise substantial doubt about Tanisys Technology, Inc.’s ability to continue as a going concern.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue in existence

/s/ Brown, Graham and Company P.C.

Austin, Texas

October 30, 2001

#

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

#

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

s

tANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC.  AND SUBSIDIARIES

TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999

1.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Tanisys Technology, Inc. (“Tanisys”) and its wholly owned subsidiaries, 1st Tech Corporation (“1st Tech”), DarkHorse Systems, Inc. (“DarkHorse”), Rosetta Marketing and Sales Inc., and Tanisys (Europe) Ltd., which was located in Scotland (collectively, the “Company”). The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America accounting principles.  All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.  

The Company designs, manufactures and markets production level automated test equipment for a wide variety of memory technologies.

On December 9, 1999, the Company sold its memory module manufacturing business, including all of the common stock of Tanisys (Europe) Ltd.  The assets and liabilities and the loss from the sale of the memory module manufacturing business have been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements as discontinued operations. (See Note 2 for discussion of discontinued operations)

Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted accounting principlesin the United States of America, which contemplates continuation of the Company as a going concern.  Numerous factors could affect the Company’s operating results, including, but not limited to, general economic conditions, competition, and changing technologies.  A change in any of these factors could have an adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.  The Company experienced an operating losss

TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999

1.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

(Continued)

of  $2,360,995 for the year ended September 30, 2001, even though it had net operating income of $2,150,486 for the year ended September 30, 2000. The Company had to raise additional capital in order to continue its operations in fiscal 2001 resulting in the issuance of Series A Preferred Stock and related debt (See Notes 7 and 9).  The current economic slowdown continues in the worldwide semiconductor industry resulting in concern over the sustainability of the Company’s revenues and its ability to attract additional capital if needed.

In view of these matters, realization of a major portion of the assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet is dependent upon continued operations of the Company, which in turn may be dependent upon the success of its future operations.  Management believes that the Company’s reputation in the marketplace and its well respected product line will help generate revenues during the remainder of the economic downturn.  These revenues will result in a certain level of cash flow which, when coupled with the Company’s current cash position, will provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern.   

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be classified as cash equivalents.  Cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates market value.  The Company places its cash investments in high credit quality instruments.  

TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999

1.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

(Continued)

Inventory

Inventory is valued at standard cost which approximates actual cost computed on a first-in, first-out basis, not in excess of market value.  Inventory costs include direct materials and certain indirect manufacturing overhead expenses.  (See Note 3)  

The Company’s policy concerning inventory impairment charges is to establish a new, reduced cost basis for the affected inventory that remains until the inventory is sold or disposed.  Only additional impairment charges could affect the cost basis.  If subsequent to the date of impairment it is determined that the impairment charges are recoverable, the Company does not increase the carrying costs of the affected inventory and corresponding income.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization.  Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives, which range from three to seven years.  Leasehold improvements and assets subject to capital leases are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the term of the lease or life of the asset.  Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred.

TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2000, 1999 and 1998

1.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

(Continued)

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company continually monitors events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of long-lived assets, including intangible assets, may not be recoverable.  When such events or changes in circumstances are present, the Company assesses the recoverability of long-lived assets by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through undiscounted future cash flows.  If the total of future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of these assets, the Company recognizes an impairment loss based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets.

Foreign Currency Translation

The Company uses the U.S. dollar as its functional currency.  All revenue is invoiced and received in U.S. dollars.  On infrequent occasions, the Company may choose to pay immaterial amounts to suppliers in a foreign currency.  In fiscal 2001, the effect of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on the Company’s cash and cash equivalents was not material.

The former Scotland subsidiary, Tanisys (Europe) Ltd., used the Pound Sterling as its functional currency. Income and expense items were translated into U.S. dollars at the average exchange rate prevailing during the period.  The aggregate translationaction  gains and losses included in the determination of net loss are not material for any period presented.  The stock of Tanisys (Europe) Ltd. was sold in December 1999. (See Note 2)

Revenue Recognition

Revenue from sales is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, such as a purchase order; the related products are shipped to the purchaser, typically freight on board shipping point or at the time the services are rendered; the price is fixed or determinable; and collectibility is reasonably assured.  The Company warrants products against defects, and accrues the cost of warranting these products as the items are shipped.  

TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999

1.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

(Continued)

Revenue Recognition

Revenue from sales is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, such as a purchase order, the related products are shipped, typically freight on board shipping point or at the time the services are rendered; the price is fixed and determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured.  The Company warrants products against defects, has a policy concerning the return of products and accrues the cost of warranting these products as the items are shipped.  

The Company sells its test systems directly to customers through its internal sales organization and through distribution partners in Asia.  The Company has entered into agreements with these distribution partners whereby they may purchase the Company’s test systems at a discount and resellale the test systems to their customers. As part of the agreement, the distribution partners provide technical support to their customers. The Company generally warrants its products against defects for a period of one year to all of its customers, including its distribution partners.  In the past, product warranty costs have been insignificant.

Sales to distribution partners are recognized as revenue by the Company upon the shipment of products because the distribution partners, like the Company’s other customers, have issued purchase orders with fixed pricing and are obligatedresponsible  for payment to the Company.

TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2000, 1999 and 1998

1.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

(Continued)

Sales contracts with the Company’s customers do not typically include formal acceptance provisions or installation obligations.  At a customer’s request, the Company will provide an evaluation unit for the customer to qualify the test system as to the customer’s performance standards.  The Company does not recognize revenue on these evaluation units.  Once a customer completes its evaluation of the Company’s test system, the customer may return or purchase the test system.  If the customer purchases the test system, the Company recognizes the revenue upon receipt of the customer’s purchase order.

The only volume discounts given by the Company are those that are negotiated prior to future sales and for a predetermined fixed period of time.  Therefore, no estimated volume discounts are required to be accounted for in the Company’s financial statements.

Research and Development

Research and development expenses relate primarily to the technological development and enhancement of the Company’s products.  Research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred.

Advertising

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and amounted to $19,177 in fiscal 2001, $21,037 in fiscal 2000, and $69,338 in fiscal 1999.

Stock Options, Warrants and Stock Issues

From time to time, the Company may grant stock options to its employees, directors, and consultants as long-term incentives.  Stock options generally are granted at option prices not less than fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of grant.  Accordingly, stock options have value only if the price of the Common Stock appreciates after the date the options are granted.

Warrants are issued on occasion to lenders, consultants, and others as part of negotiations to obtain the best terms possible for the Company.

TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999

1.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

(Continued)

Stock Options, Warrants and Stock Issues

From time to time, the Company may grant stock options to its employees, directors, and consultants as long-term incentives.  Stock options generally are granted at option prices not less than fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of grant.  Accordingly, stock options have value only if the price of the Common Stock appreciates after the date the options are granted.

Warrants are issued on occasion to lenders, consultants, and others as part of negotiations to obtain the best terms possible for the Company.

Common Stock has been issued in the past in lieu of cash payments for services provided to the Company in an effort to conserve cash.  When issued as payment for services, the Common Stock is generally issued at the equivalent of fair market value.

Amortization of Discount

Amortization of beneficial conversion feature (“discount”) of convertible preferred stock (“stock”) is recognized and measured at the purchase date of the preferred stock.  The amount is calculated as the difference between the conversion price and the fair value of the common stock which the preferred stock is convertible, multiplied by the number of shares into which the preferred stock is convertible (“intrinsic value”).  The intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature is limited to the proceeds received from the sale of the stock.  The discount assigned to the convertible preferred stock is amortized over the period to the securities earliest conversion date and charged to retained earnings as a dividend.

The discount of a note payable due to the effective rate differing from the stated rate is amortized as interest expense over the life of the note.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issues SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for the Derivative Investments and Hedging Activities.” The statement establishes accounting and reporting standards requiring that every derivative instrument be recorded in the balance sheet as either an asset or a liability measured at its fair value. The statement also requires that changes in the derivative’s fair value be recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. In July, 1999, FASB issued SFAS No. 137, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities- Deferral of the Effective Date for FASB No. 133.” SFAS No. 137 deferred the effective date of SFAS No. 133 until the first fiscal year beginning after June 15, 2000. In June, 2000, the FASB issued SFAS No. 138 “Accounting for Derivative Instrum ents and Hedging Activities- An Amendment of SFAS No. 133.” SFAS No. 138 amends the accounting and reporting standards for certain derivatives and hedging activities such as net settlement contracts, foreign currency translations and intercompany derivatives. The Company does not currently hold derivative instruments or engage in hedging activities. The adoption of the SFAS No. 133, as amended by SFAS No. 137 and 138, on October 1, 2000 did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operation or cash flows.

In June 2001, the FASB issued two statements. SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations,” and SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” SFAS No. 141 addresses financial accounting and reporting for business combinations and supersedes APB No. 16 “Business Combinations.” All business combinations in the scope of this statement are to be accounted for using one method, the purchase method. SFAS No. 142 addresses financial accounting and reporting for acquired goodwill and other intangible assets and supersedes APB No. 17, “Intangible Assets.” It changes the accounting for goodwill from an amortization method to an impairment only approach. The provision of SFAS No. 142 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2000. The Company is still evaluating the impact of adopting these pronouncements on its results of operation.

TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999

1.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

(Continued)

In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143 “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations. SFAS No.” SFAS No. 143 requires, among other things, retirement obligations to be recognized when they are incurred and displayed as liabilities, with a corresponding amount capitalized as part of the related long-lived asset. The capitalized element must be expensed using a systematic and rational method over its useful life. The adoption of SFAS No. 143 is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operation or cash flow.

In October 2001, the FASB issued SFAS 144 “ Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” which is required to be applied starting with fiscal years beginning after December 12, 2001. SFAS 144 requires, among other things, the application of one accounting model for long-lived assets that are impaired or to be disposed of by sale. The adoption of SFAS 144 is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In June 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income,” which establishes standards for reporting and displaying comprehensive income and its components in a full set of general purpose financial statements.  This statement became effective for the Company in fiscal 1999.  Comprehensive income generally represents all changes in stockholders’ equity except those resulting from contributions by stockholders.  There was no impact to the Company as a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 130, as there were no differences between net loss and comprehensive loss available to common stockholders for the years ended September 30, 2000 and 1999.

TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2000, 1999 and 1998

1.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

(Continued)

In June 1997, the FASB issued SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.”  SFAS No. 131 requires publicly held companies to report financial and other information about key revenue-producing segments of the entity for which such information is available and is utilized by the chief operating decision maker.  Specific information to be reported for individual segments includes profit or loss, certain revenue and expense items and total assets.  A reconciliation of segment financial information to amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements is also to be provided.  SFAS No. 131 became effective for the Company in fiscal year 1999.  The Company has adopted this statement, but due to the sale of the memory module manufacturing business, the Company does not have operating segments.

In June 1998, the FASB issued SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (FAS 133).  This statement, as amended, establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and requires recognition of all derivatives as assets or liabilities in the balance sheet and measurement of those instruments at fair value.  The statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2000.  The company currently does not believe the adoption of FAS 133 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In December 1999, the Staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements” (“SAB 101”).  This SAB summarizes certain of the Staff’s views in applying generally accepted accounting principles to revenue recognition in financial statements.  The Company’s revenue recognition policy is in compliance with SAB 101.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates and such differences may be material to the financial statements.

2.

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

On December 9, 1999, the Company sold certain assets of its memory module manufacturing business, including all the stock of Tanisys (Europe) Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company located in Scotland.  The sale also included the assumption of certain liabilities by the buyer.  The results of the memory module manufacturing operations have been classified as discontinued operations in all fiscal periods presented.

Revenue of the discontinued operations was $0, $0, and $42,364,464 in fiscal 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.  

TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999

1.

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS (Continued)

The loss on the sale, as well as the costs associated with the disposition of the memory module manufacturing business, has been recorded in the consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 1999. As of September 30, 2001, the remaining future costs associated with the disposition of the discontinued operations was $378,160, including actual and estimated remaining balances of terminated equipment and real estate leases, legal and professional fees, related vendor liabilities, and other miscellaneous accrued expenses.   

TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999

2.

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS (Continued)

Assets and liabilities of the memory module manufacturing business consisted of the following:  

3.

INVENTORY

Inventory consists of the following:

4.

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consists of the following

:

TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999

Included in the amounts above is approximately $53,364 and $11,668 of property and equipment acquired under capital leases at September 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively.  The accumulated amortization related to these assets totaled approximately $18,442 and $8,190 at September 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999

4.

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT (Continued)

Depreciation and amortization expense includes depreciation and amortization of property and equipment. Depreciation and amortization expense ias reflected in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations is as follows:

                Year Ended September 30,

5.

ACCRUED LIABILITIES

Accrued liabilities consist of the following:

6.         REVOLVING CREDIT NOTE

On December 17, 1999, the Company entered into an agreement with Silicon Valley  Bank  (“the Bank”) under an Accounts Receivable Purchase Agreement to sell its receivables for a percentage of the face amount, not to exceed $2,000,000.  The Company was required to repurchase a receivable if it became more than 90 days old or if the debtor filed for bankruptcy.  This agreement was modified and extended for one year on April 3, 2000, to provide more favorable financing costs.  As part of the agreement, the Company issued stock purchase warrants that allows the Bank  to purchase 50,000 shares of Common Stock at a price of $3.40 per share, which was market value on the date of the agreement.

TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999

6.         REVOLVING CREDIT NOTE (Continued)

TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999

6.         REVOLVING CREDIT NOTE (Continued)

The Company and Silicon Valley Bank entered into a new Revolving Line of Credit agreement on September 19, 2000, to replace the former Accounts Receivable Purchase Agreement dated April 3, 2000.  The Revolving Line of Credit facility provided for financing of up to a maximum of $2,000,000 secured by the assets of the Company and had a maturity date of September 18, 2001.  The Revolving Line of Credit bore an interest rate of prime plus 1.5%, decreasing to a per annum rate of prime plus 1.0% effective on the first day of the month following three consecutive months wherein the Company maintained at least a 1.50 to 1.00 Quick Ratio.  The Revolving Line of Credit agreement also provided for a non-usage fee of 0.50% per annum.  In addition, the Company had certain covenants it had to meet throughout the term of the agreement.  As of September 30, 2001 and 2000, the amount owed on the Revolving Line of Credit was $88,456 and $$600,000, respectively.  However, the Company did not meet specified financial covenants for the quarter ended March 31, 2001, and therefore, had to convert to an Accounts Receivable Financing Agreement.

On May 30, 2001, the Company entered into a new Accounts Receivable Financing Agreement with Silicon Valley Bank (the “Bank”) to replace the former Revolving Line of Credit Agreement dated September 19, 2000.  As of September 30, 2001, the amount owed under this agreement was $88,456.  The loan facility provides for the financing of up to $2,500,000 of the face amount of the Company’s accounts receivable of which the Bank will loan 80% on domestic accounts and 70% on eligible foreign accounts as determined solely by the Bank.  The applicable interest rate is prime plus 1.5%, decreasing to prime plus 1.0% if the Company is able to meet 90% of its planned revenue.  The Company does not believe it will meet the required planned revenue amounts before the maturity date of the loan facility.  The Accounts Receivable Financing Agreement also provides fo r a collateral handling fee equal to 0.50% per month of the average daily financed balance. The Accounts Receivable Financing Agreement has a maturity date of May 29, 2002 and contains certain quarterly financial covenants the Company must meet.  The Company failed to meet both the June 30, 2001 and September 30, 2001 financial covenants but received waivers of the covenants from the Bank.  In addition, the Company does not believe it will be able to meet the financial covenants for the quarter ended December 31, 2001 and March 31, 2002 due to the current economic situation.  However, the Company believes that the Bank will continue to provide financing of the Company’s accounts receivable, but the terms of the financing may be less favorable.  As part of the loan agreement, the Company issued stock purchase warrants that allows the Bank to purchase 25,000 shares of Common Stock at a price of $1.00 per share, which was market value on the date of the loan agreement. (see Note 10).

7.

LONG-TERM DEBT

In November 1998, the Company receivedissued  $2,000,000 in debtand issued notes with attached stock warrants to certain stockholders of the Company.  The debt was due in two years and carried an interest rate of 10 percent per annum, due quarterly and payable in either unregistered shares of Common Stock or cash, at the option of the Company.  One stock warrant was issued for every two dollars of debt, resulting in the issuance of 1,000,000 stock warrants.  Each warrant is exercisable into one share of Common Stock beginning on December 1, 1998, at an exercise price of $0.50 per share and increased to $1.00 per share after August 1, 1999. The exercise price increased to $2.00 per share on October 1, 2000.  The warrants expired on November 1, 2001. The noteholders were issued 0 and 75,000 shares of Common Stock upon the exercise of certain warrants for the fisca l years ended September 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999

7.

LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued)

TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999

7.

LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued)

The Company determined the fair value of the warrants to be approximately $461,538, and has reflected this value as a discount on the debt.  The debt discount was being amortized as interest expense over the life of the related debt.

In connection with the placement and issuance of this debt, the Company incurred costs of $21,350 and issued 50,000 stock warrants to the Company’s chairman of the board and 12,500 stock warrants to its legal counsel.  Each warrant was exercisable into one share of Common Stock at $0.02 per share beginning on December 1, 1998., and would expire on November 1, 2001.  As of September 30, 1999, all of these warrants had been exercised for 62,500 shares of Common Stock.  The Company valued the warrants at $1.20 per share, or $75,000.  For years prior to conversion, the total debt issuance costs of $96,350 have been reflected in other noncurrent assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and are being amortized on the straight line method over the life of the related debt.

During the second fiscal quarter of the year ended September 30, 2000, all of the $2,000,000 in debt to certain stockholders was converted to 4,000,000 shares of Common Stock.  Along with the notes payable to these stockholders, all related discounts and debt issuance costs were charged to Common Stock on the Consolidated Balance Sheet for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2000.  For years prior to conversion, the total debt issuance costs of $96,350 have been reflected in other noncurrent assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and are being amortized on the straight line method over the life of the related debt.

On August 13, 2001, the Company entered into a Series A Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement in conjunction with a private placement financing with an investment group led by New Century Equity Holdings Corp. (“New Century”).  The financing consisted of the issuance of 2,642,200 shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock (see Note 9) and a note payable to the investors for the amount of their investment of of $2,642,200.  The note has no interest, cannot be prepaid, and matures on July 13, 2003.  Repayment ofn the note can only be made with payments calculated by multiplying the excess of the quarterly EBITDA over specified financial targets less quarterly capital expenditures over $300,000 by 50%.  These calculated payments are to be paid until the debt has been repaid in full. However, if the debt has not been repaid in full on or before July 15, 2003, New Century may at its sole option require the Company to issue to the investors additional shares of Series A Preferred Stock equal to 50% of the then outstanding Common Stock, Preferred Stock, and any Common Stock equivalents on an as-if-converted and fully diluted basis.  

The Company, at August 13, 2001 valued the note payable to the Series A Preferred stockholders at $177,000, consisting of the face value of $2,642,200 and a discount on the debt of $2,465,200 to be amortized over the term of the note. (see Note 9). For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2001, the Company charged $168,801 of the discount on the debt to interest expense leaving a September 30, 2001 note balance, net of discount, of $345,801, and is due during the year ended September 30, 2003.

TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999

8.

LEASE COMMITMENTS

The Company leases certain equipment and office space under noncancellable leases with expiration dates ranging from 2001 through 2004.

Future minimum lease payments under all leases from continuing operations at September 30, 2001 were as follows:

TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999

8.

LEASE COMMITMENTS (Continued)

Rent expense recorded under all operating leases was $200,755, $197,600 and $405,228, for the years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.  Interest rates on the capital leases range from 12.5% to 15.8%.  

9.

PREFERRED STOCK

The Company is authorized to issue 10,000,000 shares of $1 par value Preferred Stock.  The Board of Directors may from time to time issue series of Preferred Stock with terms specified at their discretion.

Pursuant to a Convertible Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”), on June 30, 1998 the Company issued 400 shares of its 5% Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $1 per share (“Series A Stock”), for $4,000,000.  

The Series A Stock was convertible into the Company’s no par value common stock (“Common Stock”) at the option of the holder. The conversion price was the lesser of the fixed conversion price of $4.62 per share or a variable conversion price.  The Company has valued this beneficial conversion feature at $1,403,509 and has reflected this amount in additional paid-in capital and as a charge to the accumulated deficit as a dividend in the amount of $0, $0, and $865,493 for the years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999

9.

PREFERRED STOCK  (Continued)

Dividends were payable quarterly in either cash or shares of Common Stock.  All dividends were paid in shares of Common Stock. For the years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999, the Company paid dividends of $0, $57,611 and $114,331 by issuing 0, 111,829 and 54,867 shares of Common Stock, respectively, based on the market value.

Attached to the Series A Stock were warrants to purchase 100,000 shares of Common Stock.  During the year ended September 30, 2000, a portion of these warrants were exercised for 66,667 shares of Common Stock.  The remaining warrants are currently exercisable at $6.00 per share and expire on June 30, 2002.  The Company has valued the warrants at $283,803 and has reflected this amount in additional paid-in capital during the year ended September 30, 1998.

TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999

9.

PREFERRED STOCK  (Continued)

Attached to the Series A Stock were warrants to purchase 100,000 shares of Common Stock.  During the year ended September 30, 2000, a portion of these warrants were exercised for 66,667 shares of Common Stock.  The remaining warrants are currently exercisable at $6.00 per share and expire on June 30, 2002.  The Company has valued the warrants at $283,803 and has reflected this amount in additional paid-in capital during the year ended September 30, 1998.

During the year ended September 30, 1999, the preferred stockholders converted 175 shares of Series A Stock for 767,599 shares of Common Stock.

During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2000, the Company converted all of the remaining 225 shares of Series A Stock for 4,672,541 shares of Common Stock in the amount of $1,846,017.

At September 30, 2001 and 2000, the carrying value of the Series A Stock consisted of the following:

The economic downturn that began during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2001 has had an impact on purchases and capital spending in many of the worldwide markets the Company serves.  As a result, the Company’s revenues decreased sharply resulting in a loss from operations for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2001.  Accordingly, the Company’s cash position deteriorated to a point where it was necessary to raise additional capital to meet ongoing needs.

The Company’s Board of Directors has approved the issuance of 2,635,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred”) for $1.00 per share pursuant to a Series A Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement (the ”Agreement”) dated August 13, 2001.  The issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock resulted from a private placement financing with an investment group led by New Century Equity Holdings Corp. (“New Century”) (Nasdaq: NCEH), a Delaware corporation.  New Century participated in the financing through the purchase of 1,060,000 shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock.  The proceeds, net of offering costs of approximately $186,000, will be utilized to continue product development and marketing efforts and to provide working capital for the Company’s operations.

The Company has issued 2,635,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred”) for $1.00 per share pursuant to a Series A Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) dated August 13, 2001.  The issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock resulted from a private placement financing with an investment group led by New Century Equity Holdings Corp. (“New Century”) (Nasdaq: NCEH), a Delaware corporation.  New Century participated in the financing through the purchase of 1,060,000 of the above shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock which represented approximately 40% of the original issuance of the Series A Preferred.  On August 13, 2001, the date the Purchase Agreement was signed, Mr. Parris H. Holmes, Jr., served as Chairman of the Board of Directors for both New Century and the Company.  The proceed s of $2,635,000, net of offering costs of approximately $171,000, will be utilized to continue product development and marketing efforts and to provide working capital for the Company’s operations.

On September 28, 2001, the Company issued 7,200 shares of Series A Preferred in lieu of cash for costs relating to the offering.  

TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999

9.

PREFERRED STOCK  (Continued)

Each share of Series A Preferred is immediately convertible into 33.334 shares of Common Stock.  The holders of the Series A Preferred will be entitled to a cumulative annual dividend of 15%, payable quarterly, which, at the option of New Century may be paid in cash or in additional shares of Series A Preferred.  

On October 30, 2001, Aa dividend of 53,229 shares of Series A Preferred was paid to the holders of the Series A Preferred for the quarter ended September 30, 2001.

The holders of the Series A Preferred will have a liquidation preference in the event of any liquidation, sale, merger or similar event, and have registration rights and other customary rights.  The Company has also agreed to make payments to the holders of the Series A Preferred, to the extent its cash flow meets certain levels, until the holders have received the amount of their investment in the Series A Preferred and has granted a security interest in all of its assets to secure its obligation to make these payments subject to the security interest of the Company’s bank loan facility.  In addition, the Company has also agreed to issue additional shares of Series A Preferred equal to 50% of the then fully diluted Common Stock to the holders if the Company fails to return the amount of their investment, plus the mandatory dividends, by July 15, 2003.  The Company h as also agreed to issue, at up to six different times, additional shares of Series A Preferred to the investors equal to 25% of the then fully diluted Common Stock if the Company fails to meet any of certain financial targets, beginning with the quarters ended September 30, 2001 and December 31, 2001, and then for the four six-month periods ending June 30, 2002, December 31, 2002, June 30, 2003, and December 31, 2003.  On October 30, 2001, the Company issued 999,051 shares of Series A Preferred due to its failure to meet the financial targets for the quarter ended September 30, 2001 as set forth in the Series A Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement.  If the slowdown in the worldwide semiconductor industry continues for an extended period of time, the Company may not meet one or more of the remaining specified financial targets, thus triggering the issuance of additional shares of Series A Preferred.   It appears that the Company will not meet the specified financial targets for the quarter e nded December 31, 2001.

The holders of the Series A Preferred will have a liquidation preference in the event of any liquidation, sale, merger or similar event, and have registration rights and other customary rights.  The Company has also issued a note payable to the Series A Preferred stockholders in the amount of $2,642,200 with repayments only to be made to the extent the Company’s cash flow meets certain levels. (see Note 7)  In conjunction with the debt, the Company has granted a security interest in all of its assets to secure its obligation to make these payments subject to the security interest of the Company’s bank loan facility.  In addition, the Company has also agreed to issue additional shares of Series A Preferred equal to 50% of the then fully diluted Common Stock to the holders if the Company fails to repay the notes, plus the mandatory dividends, by July 15, 2003. &nb sp;The Company has also agreed to issue, at up to six different times, additional shares of Series A Preferred to the investors equal to 25% of the then fully diluted Common Stock if the Company fails to meet any of certain financial targets, beginning with the quarters ended September 30, 2001 and December 31, 2001, and then for the four six-month periods ending June 30, 2002, December 31, 2002, June 30, 2003, and December 31, 2003.  On October 30, 2001, the Company issued 999,051 shares of Series A Preferred due to its failure to meet the financial targets for the quarter ended September 30, 2001 as set forth in the Series A Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement.  The Company does not expect to meet the specified financial targets for the quarter ended December 31, 2001.

TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999

9.

PREFERRED STOCK  (Continued)

The Company obtained an appraisal of the Series A Preferred and the notes payable at August 13, 2001, and allocated the proceeds of the financing to both instruments based on the valuation. The proceeds of $2,642,200 were allocated to the Series A Preferred and the notes payable in the amount of $2,465,200 and $177,000, respectively.

The beneficial conversion feature (discount) in the amount of $7,439,168, for the convertible preferred stock is limited to the proceeds allocated to the Series A Preferred in the amount of $2,465,200. Due to the Series A Preferred being immediately convertible, the $2,465,200 has been recorded as a dividend in the consolidated financial statements.

The Company, at August 13, 2001, valued the Series A Preferred at $2,465,200 less offering costs of $186,059.  The Series A Preferred stock has a 15% per annum cumulative dividend which was declared and accrued in the amount of $53,299 on September 30, 2001.

The Series A Preferred shares will vote together with the Company’s Common Stock on an as-if-converted basis and not as a separate class.  Each share of Series A Preferred will have a number of votes equal to the number of Common Stock shares then issuable upon conversion of such shares of the Series A Preferred Stock.  At the Company’s Annual Stockholders Meeting, the shareholders will vote on a proposal to authorize additional Common Stock necessary to facilitate the conversion of the Series A Preferred.  The holders of the Series A Preferred will be entitled to vote with the holders of the Common Stock at the meeting, and will control sufficient votes to approve the proposal.  

In connection with the transaction described above, two members of the Board of Directors of the Company resigned, and New Century appointed two directors to the Board.  Subject to certain requirements, New Century will have the right to appoint a third member to the Company’s five-member Board of Directors.

TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999

10.

 STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Common Stock Reverse Split

At the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 23, 2000, the Company’s stockholders approved a one-for-two reverse stock split of the Company’s Common Stock (the “Reverse Split”) effective May 25, 2000.  The Reverse Split had no effect on the number of authorized shares of Common Stock, preferred stock or Series A Preferred Stock.  Any stockholder otherwise entitled to any fractional share interest due to the Reverse Split received in lieu thereof, one additional share of Common Stock for the fractional share such stockholder would have been entitled to as a result of the Reverse Split.

10.

 STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Common Stock Reverse Split

At the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 23, 2000, the Company’s stockholders approved a one-for-two reverse stock split of the Company’s Common Stock (the “Reverse Split”) effective May 25, 2000.  The Reverse Split had no effect on the number of authorized shares of Common Stock, preferred stock or Series A Preferred Stock.  Any stockholder otherwise entitled to any fractional share interest due to the Reverse Split received in lieu thereof, one additional share of Common Stock for the fractional share such stockholder would have been entitled to as a result of the Reverse Split.

The number of shares and per share amounts of the Company’s Common Stock, warrants and stock options set forth herein have been retroactively adjusted for all periods presented to reflect the Reverse Split.

Private Placement of Common Stock

In March 2000, the Company issued 1,528,750 shares of its Common Stock for consideration of $1,223,000.  The shares of Common Stock issued in the private placement are restricted securities.  The transaction was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(1) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.  Proceeds of the private placement are being used for working capital.

TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999

10.

 STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (continued)

Warrants

During the years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999, the Company issued warrants to various individuals or companies for services in connection with debt.  Each stock warrant entitles the holder to purchase one share of Common Stock at a particular price, vesting period and expiration date specified within each individual warrant agreement.  The shares issued upon exercise of these stock warrants are subject to resale restrictions.  The following summarizes the warrants issued by the Company:

Stock Options

The Company has two stock option plans.  .  All options granted under the plans are exercisable for Common Stock as permitted by SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.”

TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999

10.

 STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (continued)

The 1993 Stock Option Plan permits grants to the Company's directors, key employees and consultants. The 1997 Non-Employee Director Plan permits grants to the Company's non-employee directors.  The stock options granted under each of these plans are granted with an exercise price at fair market value on the date of grant, vest ratably over a predefined period and expire no more than ten years from the date of grant.  At September 30, 2001, the Company had reserved a total of 7,000,000 shares of Common Stock for the plans.

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at September 30, 2001:

TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999

10.

 STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (continued)

A summary of the activity of the Company's stock option plans is presented below:

The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used for grants in fiscal 2001, 2000 and 1999:

The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used for grants in fiscal 2001, 2000 and 1999:

TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999

10.

 STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (continued)

The Company applies Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" and related interpretations in accounting for its plans.  Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized for grants under the stock option plans since the exercise price of the options equals the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of grant.

Had compensation cost for all stock option grants been determined based on fair market value at the grant dates consistent with the fair value method prescribed by SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,"  the Company's net income (loss) and net income ( loss) per share would have been increased (decreased) to the pro forma amounts indicated below:

TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999

10.

 STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (continued)

11.

INCOME TAXES

For the years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999, the Company incurred consolidated net operating losses for U.S. income tax purposes of approximately $2X,321XXX,000, $12,575351,000000 and $2,570,000 and for non-U.S. income tax purposes of approximately $0XXX,XXX, $426,453 and $817,000, respectively.  The tax loss carry-forwards of approximately $26XX,092XXX,000 at September 30, 2001 begin to expire in 2011.  At September 30, 2001 and 2000, the Company had temporary differences resulting in future taxable (income)  and deductions of approximately ($40X, XXX,000000) and $1,430,000, respectively, principally representing differences in accounting and tax basis in accrued liabilities, reserves, depreciation and anticipated loss from discontinued operations.  Deferred income tax assets from the loss carry-forwards and asset basis differences aggregate approximately $8X,,871XXX,000 and $8,343343,000 at September 30, 2001, and 2000, respectively.

For financial reporting purposes, valuation allowances of $8X,871 XXX, 000 and $8,343,000 at September 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively, have been recorded to offset the deferred tax assets due to the uncertainty as to whether the benefits will be realized.

TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999

11.

INCOME TAXES (Continued)

The Company was unable to use the tax losses generated during the current year and prior years. TThe availability of the net operating loss carry-forwards and future tax deductions to reduce taxable income is subject to various limitations under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), in the event of an ownership change as defined in Section 382 of the Code.  The Company may lose the benefit of such net operating loss carry-forwards due to Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) Code Section 382 limitations.  This section states that after reorganization or other change in corporate ownership, the use of certain carry-forwards may be limited or prohibited.  The Company believes that the limitation under the IRS Code Section 382 limitation did not exist as of September 30, 20010, and if triggered, the consequence is expected to have no mate rial impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

12.

EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic income or loss per common share is computed based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. For the year ended September 30, 2001, diluted income or loss per common share is computed based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, after giving effect to the potential issuance of Common Stock on the exercise of options and warrants and the conversion of 2,642,200 shares of Series A Stock and the impact of assumed conversions.  For the years ended September 30, 2000 and 1999, potentially dilutive securities have not been included in the diluted loss per common share calculation asTANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999

12.

EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic income or loss per common share is computed based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. For the year ended September 30, 2001, diluted income or loss per common share is computed based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, after giving effect to the potential issuance of Common Stock on the exercise of options and warrants and the conversion of 2,642,200 shares of Series A Stock and the impact of assumed conversions.  For the year ended September 30, 2001, potentially dilutive securities have not been included in the diluted loss per common share calculation as

 they would have been antidilutive.  The following table provides a reconciliation between basic and diluted shares outstanding:

If potentially dilutive securities had been included in the loss per common share calculations, the reconciliation between basic and dilutive shares outstanding would be as follows:

TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999

12.

EARNINGS PER SHARE (Continued)

The following data shows the amount used in computing diluted earnings per share and the effect on income:

TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999

12.

EARNINGS PER SHARE (Continued)

The following data shows the calculation of the income available to common stockholders used in computing diluted earnings per share;

13.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On August 13, 2001, the Company issued 2,635,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock for $1.00 per share pursuant to a Series A Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement to a group of investors (see Note 9).  New Century Equity Holdings Corp. (“New Century”) was the lead investor and participated by purchasing 1,060,000 shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock.  The Company’s Chairman of the Board of Directors, Parris H. Holmes, Jr., is also the Chairman of the Board of Directors for New Century.  Each Series A Preferred share is convertible into 33.334 shares of the Company’s Common Stock with voting rights on an as-if-converted basis.  As a result, the Series A Preferred stockholders have the majority of the voting stock.  In connection with the transaction described above, two members of the Board of Directors of the Company resigned, and New Century appointed two directors to the Board.  Subject to certain requirements, New Century will have the right to appoint a third member to the Company’s five-member Board of Directors.  Therefore, New Century has the controlling interest in the Company.

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2001, the Company paid $41,819 to its Chairman of the Board for expenses related to the August 27, 2001 Series A Preferred Stock transaction recorded as offering costs.

General and administrative expense includes consulting fees and expenses in the amount of $542, $72,736 and $103,693 paid with Common Stock, stock options, warrants or cash to the Company’s chairman for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999

1.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Continued)

TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999

13.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Continued)

General and administrative expense includes professional fees in the amount of $52,050, $53,711 and  $45,000 paid to one of the Company’s outside legal counsel, who also served as corporate secretary of the Company until August 13, 2001, for legal services provided for the years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.  All of these fees were paid with cash or Common Stock.

In December 1999, the Company borrowed $200,000 from an officer of the Company for a short-term working capital bridge loan while the Company was finalizing its banking relationship with Silicon Valley Bank.  The loan was repaid in full in January 2000, including interest of $540.

On January 12, 2000, the Company issued 575,000 shares of Common Stock to its chairman, president, secretary and legal consultants in connection with the sale of the memory module manufacturing business.  The Common Stock was valued at $223,300 based on the market value at the date of issue and has been included in the estimated loss on disposal of the memory module manufacturing business in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999.

The Company issued 250,000 shares of Common Stock on March 8, 2000, to its chairman, president, and secretary in connection with a private placement of Common Stock.  The Common Stock was valued at $200,000 based on the market value at the date of issue recorded as offering costs..

14.

SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMERS

The following matrix provides a summary of the Company's customers with more than 10% of total net sales during the years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999, and customers from which the Company had accounts receivable that exceeded 10% of total accounts receivable at September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999.  Amounts less than 10% are reflected as a dash.

TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999

TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Years ended September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999

15.

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

The Company sponsors The Tanisys Technology, Inc. 401(k) Plan (the “Plan”), which qualifies under Section 401(k) of the IRS Code for eligible employees.  Eligible employees may defer a portion of their annual compensation under the Plan subject to maximum limitations.  Generally, all employees of the Company who are 18 years of age are eligible for participation in the 401(k) Plan on the first day of the month following their dates of hire.  

Under provisions of the Plan, the Company may elect to make discretionary matching contributions to the Plan for the benefit of the participants.  No such discretionary contributions were made in fiscal 20010, 20001999 or 19998.

16.

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company retained certain assets related to its discontinued memory module manufacturing business that was sold in December 1999.  Included in these assets was equipment that was subject to a lease agreement from a certain leasing company.  This equipment was sold in May 2000 with all the proceeds from the sale being used to reduce the lease obligation.  The Company settled the remaining balance of the lease obligation in October 2001.

1.

CONTINGENCIES

The Company is a defendant in a lawsuit filed by the purchaser of the Company’s discontinued memory module manufacturing business for alleged breach of representations, warranties and covenants.  The suit asks for $50,000 plus attorneys’ fees and court costs.  The Company has reached a tentative settlement in which it will grant a credit to the purchaser and will also give a specified discount on a limited amount of possible future purchases from the Company.  The credit has been accrued in the net current liabilities of discontinued operations on the Company’s balance sheet.  The Company believes that the settlement will be finalized in its current form.  However, due to the inherent uncertainty of litigation, there can be no assurance that the resolution of any particular claim or proceeding would not have a material adverse effect on the Compan y’s results of operations for the fiscal period in which such resolution occurred.  

The Company has settled a lawsuit with a leasing company concerning lease for equipment that was utilized in the Company’s former memory module manufacturing business that was sold in December 1999.  The settlement consisted of a one-time cash payment plus 60,000 shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock.  However, a substantial judgement was awarded the leasing company and will be terminated upon the Company registering the stock on or before February 1, 2002.  If the underlying common stock is not registered by February 1, 2002, the leasing company at its sole discretion may (1) keep the stock or (2) require the Company to repurchase the Series A Preferred Stock at a price based on the closing price of the Company’s stock on February 1, 2002 with a minimum purchase price of $60,000 and a maximum purchase price of $180,000.  If the Company were to repurchase the stock, the Company may make monthly payments of $15,000 until the amount is repaid in full.  If the Company is required to repurchase the Series A Preferred and defaults on the payments, the original judgement will be reinstated in the amount of approximately $1,000,000.   

ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON

ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

NONE.

ITEM 10.

 DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY.

The information required by this item relating to the Company’s directors and nominees and disclosure relating to compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is included under the captions “Election of Directors” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.

The Company’s executive officers and key employees and their respective ages and positions as of December 17, 2001 are as follows:

Name

Age

Position(s)

Richard M. Brook

42

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

John R. Bennett

41

Vice President of Sales and Marketing

Joseph C. Klein

45

Vice President of Operations and Engineering

Terry W. Reynolds

45

Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer

The following are biographies of the Company’s executive officers, including all positions currently held with the Company and positions held during the last five years.

Richard M. Brook joined the Company as President and Chief Executive Officer in October 2001.  Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Brook served in a variety of management positions for technology companies as a consultant for Brook and Associates.  From 1991 to 1998, Mr. Brook was a founder and served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Peak International, a supplier of materials to the semiconductor industry.  Prior to working at Peak, he worked for more than nine years at Texas Instruments.  Mr. Brook holds two patents on semiconductor packaging and wafer processing.

John R. Bennett, Vice President of Sales and Marketing, joined the Company in November 1996 with many years of sales and marketing experience in the electronics, computer and peripherals businesses.  Prior to being appointed Vice President in October 1997, Mr. Bennett served as Director of Sales at Tanisys, with prior responsibilities for the sales management of Tanisys' DarkHorse line of memory test equipment.  Other positions held by Mr. Bennett include Senior Consultant, IBM, from October 1995 to November 1996, Vice President, Marketing, CACTUS Inc., from August 1994 to October 1995 and National Marketing Manager and National Sales Manager, CalComp (Division of Lockheed), from July 1988 to August 1994.

Joseph C. Klein, Ph.D., Vice President of Operations and Engineering, joined the Company in November 1997.  Dr. Klein has over 15 years of experience in the electronics and computer industry.  Prior to joining the Company, Dr. Klein was Vice President of Engineering/Research and Development for PNY Technologies, Inc. from November 1994 to November 1997 and was World Wide Manager of Semiconductor Memory Product for IBM from November 1984 to November 1994.

Terry W. Reynolds, CPA, joined the Company as Vice President of Finance in January 2000.   He currently serves the Company as Vice President of Finance and Administration as well as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer.  Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Reynolds served from October 1998 to December 1999 as Chief Financial Officer of Doyle Wilson Homebuilder.  From September 1996 to October 1998, he was the Chief Financial Officer for Windsport, and prior to that he worked for the public accounting firms of Charles Douthitt & Co. and Arthur Andersen LLP.  He has over 20 years experience in financial management and has also held positions with Chrysler Technologies Corporation and First Financial Corporation.

ITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

Information about compensation of the Company’s named executive officers appears under “Executive Compensation” in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held February 26, 2002 and is incorporated herein by reference.

Information about compensation of the Company’s directors is included in “Compensation of Directors” in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held February 26, 2002 and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MAMANAGEMENT.

The information required by this item is included under the caption “Ownership of Common Stock” in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held February 26, 2002 and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.

The information required by this item is included under the caption “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held February 26, 2002 and is incorporated herein by reference.

PART IV.

ITEM 14.

EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.

a)

Documents filed with this report:

1)

Financial Statements:

The consolidated financial statements of the Company and report of the Company’s independent public

accountants thereon have been filed under Item 8 hereof.

2)

The following consolidated financial statement schedule of Tanisys Technology, Inc. is included in Item 14(d):

Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Allowances

All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities

and Exchange Commission  are not required under the related instructions, are inapplicable or information required is included in the consolidated financial statements and, therefore, have been omitted.

(b)

Exhibits:

The exhibits listed below are filed as part of or incorporated by reference in this report.  Where such filing is made by incorporation by reference to a previously filed document, such document is identified in parentheses.

Exhibit

Number

Description

3.1

Articles of Incorporation of Tanisys Technology, Inc., as amended (Exhibit 4.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-8, filed December 6, 2000)

3.2

Restated Bylaws of the Company (Exhibit 4.2 to Registration Statement on Form S-8, filed December 6, 2000)

4.1

Form of Common Stock Certificate (Exhibit 4.1 to September 30, 2001 Form 10-K)

1.1

Form of Class S Warrant Certificate (Exhibit 4.2 to December 31, 1997 Form 10-Q)

4.3

Registration Rights Agreement dated June 30, 1998 between Tanisys Technology, Inc. and KA Investments LDC (Exhibit 4.1 to Form S-3 Registration Statement filed August 13, 1998)

4.4

Form of Warrant to purchase Common Stock granted by Tanisys Technology, Inc. to each of KA Investments LDC, Midori Capital Corporation, Hoth Incorporated and Randy Stein (Exhibit 10.2 to Form S-3 Registration Statement filed August 13, 1998)

4.5

Form of Warrant Agreement entered into between Tanisys Technology, Inc. and subscribers to the $2 million debt offering closed November 2, 1998, and form of attached Stock Purchase Warrant issued thereunder (Exhibit 10.2 to December 31, 1998 Form 10-Q).

4.6

1993 Stock Option Plan, as amended (Exhibit 4.3 Registration Statement on Form S-8, filed December 6, 2000)

4.7

Form of Stock Option Agreement (Exhibit 10.18 to General Form for Registration of Securities on Form 10, filed November 27, 1996)

4.8

1997 Non-Employee Director Plan of Tanisys Technology, Inc., as amended (Exhibit 4.4 to Registration Statement on Form S-8, filed December 6, 2000)

4.9

Form of Automatic Non-Employee Director Stock Option Grant (Exhibit 4.5 to Registration Statement on Form S-8, filed December 6, 2000)

4.10

Convertible Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement dated June 30, 1998 between Tanisys Technology, Inc. and KA Investments LDC (Exhibit 10.1 to Form S-3 Registration Statement filed August 13, 1998)

10.1

Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of April 9, 1996, by and between Tanisys Technology, Inc., Tanisys Acquisition Corp., 1st Tech Corporation and Gary W. Pankonien ("1st Tech Merger Agreement") (Exhibit 10.3 to General Form for Registration of Securities on Form 10, filed November 27, 1996)

10.2

Amendment No. 1 dated May 16, 1996, to 1st Tech Merger Agreement (Exhibit 10.4 to General Form for Registration of Securities on Form 10, filed November 27, 1996)

10.3

Articles of Merger (Delaware) of 1st Tech with and into Tanisys Acquisition Corp., dated May 31, 1996 (Exhibit 10.5 to General Form for Registration of Securities on Form 10, filed November 27, 1996)

10.4

Articles of Merger (Texas) of 1st Tech with and into Tanisys Acquisition Corp., dated May 31, 1996 (Exhibit 10.6 to General Form for Registration of Securities on Form 10, filed November 27, 1996)

10.5

Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of April 9, 1996, by and between Tanisys Technology, Inc., Tanisys Acquisition Corp. II, DarkHorse Systems, Inc., Jack Little, Archer Lawrence and Gary W. Pankonien ("DarkHorse Merger Agreement") (Exhibit 10.7 to General Form for Registration of Securities on Form 10, filed November 27, 1996)

10.6

Amendment No. 1 dated May 16, 1996, to DarkHorse Merger Agreement (Exhibit 10.8 to General Form for Registration of Securities on Form 10, filed November 27, 1996)

10.7

Articles of Merger (Delaware) of DarkHorse with and into Tanisys Acquisition Corp. II, dated May 31, 1996 (Exhibit 10.9 to General Form for Registration of Securities on Form 10, filed November 27, 1996)

10.8

Articles of Merger (Texas) of DarkHorse with and into Tanisys Acquisition Corp. II, dated May 31, 1996 (Exhibit 10.10 to General Form for Registration of Securities on Form 10, filed November 27, 1996)

10.12

401(k) Plan (Exhibit 10.19 to General Form for Registration of Securities on Form 10, filed November 27, 1996)

10.13

Lease Agreement dated May 18, 1993 by and between Tanisys Technology, Inc., assumptor of 1^st Tech Corporation, and AEtna Life Insurance Company, as amended, (Exhibit 10.20 to General Form for Registration of Securities on Form 10, filed November 27, 1996)

10.14

Master Lease Agreement dated November 9, 1994 by and between 1st Tech and Copelco Capital Inc. (Exhibit 10.21 to General Form for Registration of Securities on Form 10, filed November 27, 1996)

10.15

Manufacturing Agreement dated as of November 1, 1996 by and between the Company and Siemens Components, Inc. (Exhibit 10.22 to Amendment No. 2 to General Form for Registration of Securities on Form 10, filed March 11, 1997)

10.16

Inventory Management Service Agreement dated as of November 1, 1996 by and between the Company and Siemens Components, Inc. (Exhibit 10.23 to Amendment No. 2 to General Form for Registration of Securities on Form 10, filed March 11, 1997)

10.19

Master Lease Agreement dated January 30, 1997 by and between the Company and Copelco Capital, Inc. (Exhibit 10.30 to March 31, 1997 Form 10-Q)

10.20

Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of July 24, 1997, by and between Tanisys Technology, Inc., 1st Tech Corporation, DarkHorse Systems, Inc., the Company and NationsCredit Commercial Corporation, through its NationsCredit Commercial Funding Division (Exhibit 10.32 to Form 10-K)

10.21

Memory Module Corporate Purchase Agreement, dated July 22, 1997, by and between Tanisys Technology, Inc. and Compaq Computer Corporation (Exhibit 10.33 to September 30, 1997 Form 10-K)

10.23

Employment Agreement, dated as of October 20, 1997, by and between Tanisys Technology, Inc. and Charles T. Comiso (Exhibit 10.34 to September 30, 1997 Form 10-K)

10.24

Employment Agreement, dated as of November 10, 1997, by and between Tanisys Technology, Inc. and Joseph C. Klein, Ph.D. (Exhibit 10.34 to September 30, 1997 Form 10-K)

10.25

Manufacturing Service Agreement dated February 2, 1998 by and between the Company and LG Semicon American, Inc. (Exhibit 10.37 to March 31, 1998 Form 10-Q)

10.26

Manufacturing Service Agreement dated March 1, 1998 by and between the Company and Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc. (Exhibit 10.37 to March 31, 1998 Form 10-Q)

10.29

Form of Promissory Note issued by Tanisys Technology, Inc. in connection with $2 million debt closed November 2, 1998 (Exhibit 10.1 to December 21, 1998 Form 10-Q)

10.31

Asset Purchase Agreement entered into between Tanisys Technology, Inc. and Tanisys Operations, LP, on December 9, 1999 (Exhibit 10.31 to September 30, 1999 Form 10-K).

10.32

Term Promissory Note for $911,339 issued by Tanisys Technology, Inc. to Tanisys Operations, LP on December 9, 1999 (Exhibit 10.32 to September 30, 1999 Form 10-K).

10.33

Term Promissory Note for $85,000 issued by Tanisys Technology, Inc. to Tanisys Operations, LP on December 9, 1999 (Exhibit 10.33 to September 30, 1999 Form 10-K).

10.34

Agreement Relating to Noncompetition entered into between Tanisys Technology, Inc. and Tanisys Operations, LP dated December 7, 1999 (Exhibit 10.34 to September 30, 1999 Form 10-K).

10.35

Settlement Agreement entered into between Tanisys Technology, Inc. and Boston Financial & Equity Corporation dated December 9, 1999 (Exhibit 10.35 to September 30, 1999 Form 10-K).

10.36

Contract for Sale of Equipment entered into between Tanisys Operations, LP and Boston Financial & Equity Corporation dated December 9, 1999, to complete release of the Master Equipment Lease between Tanisys Technology, Inc. and Boston Financial & Equity Corporation. (Exhibit 10.36 to September 30, 1999 Form 10-K).

10.37

Bill of Sale conveying equipment covered by the Master Lease Agreement between Tanisys Technology, Inc. and Boston Financial & Equity Corporation to Tanisys Operations, LP dated December 9, 1999. (Exhibit 10.37 to September 30, 1999 Form 10-K).

10.38

Lease Agreement dated April 24, 2000 by and between Tanisys Technology, Inc. and AEtna Life Insurance Company. (Exhibit 10.38 to September 30, 2000 Form 10-K).

0.1

Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement between Tanisys Technology, Inc. and  Silicon Valley Bank dated September 19, 2000. (Exhibit 10.39 to September 30, 2000 Form 10-K).

0.2

Silicon Valley Bank Accounts Receivable Financing Agreement dated May 30, 2001. (Exhibit 10.40 to June 30, 2001 Form 10-Q)

0.3

Loan Modification and Forebearance Agreement dated August 3, 2001. (Exhibit 10.41 to June 30, 2001 Form 10-Q)

0.4

Promissory Note to Charles T. Comiso dated July 27, 2001. (Exhibit 10.42 to June 30, 2001 Form 10-Q)

10.43

Employment Agreement, dated October 1, 2001, by and between Tanisys Technology, Inc. and Richard M. Brook. (filed herewith)

21.1

Subsidiaries of the Company (filed herewith)

23.1

Consent of Brown, Graham and Company P.C. (filed herewith)

23.2

Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP (filed herewith)

27.1

Financial Data Schedule (filed herewith)

(c)

Reports on 8-K.

Form 8-K dated January 12, 2000, and filed January 20, 2000, reporting a change in the Company’s independent auditors.

Form 8-K dated May 23, 2000, and filed May 25, 2000, reporting the one-for-two reverse split of the Company’s Common Stock.

Form 8-K dated August 14, 2001, and filed August 14, 2001, reporting the change in control of registrant.

(d)

Schedules.

(a)

SCHEDULE II

TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND ALLOWANCES

Fiscal Years Ended 2001, 2000 and 1999