UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE |
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE |
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 0-25259
Bottomline Technologies (de), Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
02-0433294 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
325 Corporate Drive, Portsmouth, New Hampshire |
03801-6808 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
(Zip Code) |
(603) 436-0700
Registrants telephone number, including area code
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The number of shares outstanding of the registrants common stock as of April 30, 2003 was 15,928,826.
Page No. | ||||
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
||||
Item 1. |
Financial Statements |
|||
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2003 and June 30, 2002 |
1 | |||
2 | ||||
3 | ||||
4 | ||||
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements |
5 | |||
Item 2. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
11 | ||
Item 3. |
24 | |||
Item 4. |
24 | |||
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION |
||||
Item 1. |
24 | |||
Item 2. |
24 | |||
Item 6. |
24 | |||
25 | ||||
26 |
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Bottomline Technologies (de), Inc.
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands)
March 31, 2003 |
June 30, 2002 |
|||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ |
23,879 |
|
$ |
25,931 |
| ||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts and returns of $1,663 at March 31, 2003 and $1,681 at June 30, 2002 |
|
13,483 |
|
|
15,242 |
| ||
Other current assets |
|
3,952 |
|
|
3,960 |
| ||
Total current assets |
|
41,314 |
|
|
45,133 |
| ||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
6,203 |
|
|
6,955 |
| ||
Intangible assets, net |
|
23,749 |
|
|
43,540 |
| ||
Other assets |
|
1,349 |
|
|
1,689 |
| ||
Total assets |
$ |
72,615 |
|
$ |
97,317 |
| ||
Liabilities and stockholders equity |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ |
4,698 |
|
$ |
5,154 |
| ||
Accrued expenses |
|
5,794 |
|
|
5,574 |
| ||
Deferred revenue and deposits |
|
13,092 |
|
|
13,452 |
| ||
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
253 |
|
|
253 |
| ||
Total current liabilities |
|
23,837 |
|
|
24,433 |
| ||
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
253 |
| ||
Total liabilities |
|
23,837 |
|
|
24,686 |
| ||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Common stock |
|
16 |
|
|
16 |
| ||
Additional paid-in-capital |
|
164,809 |
|
|
164,022 |
| ||
Deferred compensation |
|
(203 |
) |
|
(474 |
) | ||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
917 |
|
|
182 |
| ||
Treasury stock |
|
(4,128 |
) |
|
(4,538 |
) | ||
Retained deficit |
|
(112,633 |
) |
|
(86,577 |
) | ||
Total stockholders equity |
|
48,778 |
|
|
72,631 |
| ||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ |
72,615 |
|
$ |
97,317 |
| ||
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
Bottomline Technologies (de), Inc.
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Three Months Ended March 31, |
||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||
Software licenses |
$ |
3,598 |
|
$ |
4,231 |
| ||
Service and maintenance |
|
10,588 |
|
|
9,088 |
| ||
Equipment and supplies |
|
4,458 |
|
|
4,673 |
| ||
Total revenues |
|
18,644 |
|
|
17,992 |
| ||
Cost of revenues: |
||||||||
Software licenses |
|
425 |
|
|
274 |
| ||
Service and maintenance |
|
4,996 |
|
|
4,119 |
| ||
Equipment and supplies |
|
3,593 |
|
|
3,430 |
| ||
Total cost of revenues |
|
9,014 |
|
|
7,823 |
| ||
Gross profit |
|
9,630 |
|
|
10,169 |
| ||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||
Sales and marketing |
|
4,014 |
|
|
4,728 |
| ||
Product development and engineering: |
||||||||
Product development and engineering |
|
2,487 |
|
|
3,271 |
| ||
Stock compensation expense |
|
31 |
|
|
103 |
| ||
General and administrative |
|
2,661 |
|
|
2,759 |
| ||
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
2,235 |
|
|
8,297 |
| ||
Total operating expenses |
|
11,428 |
|
|
19,158 |
| ||
Loss from operations |
|
(1,798 |
) |
|
(8,989 |
) | ||
Other income (expense), net |
|
(412 |
) |
|
46 |
| ||
Loss before provision for income taxes |
|
(2,210 |
) |
|
(8,943 |
) | ||
Provision for income taxes |
|
15 |
|
|
113 |
| ||
Net loss |
$ |
(2,225 |
) |
$ |
(9,056 |
) | ||
Net loss per share: |
||||||||
Basic and diluted |
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
$ |
(0.59 |
) | ||
Shares used in computing net loss per share: |
||||||||
Basic and diluted |
|
15,619 |
|
|
15,470 |
| ||
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
Bottomline Technologies (de), Inc.
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Nine Months Ended March 31, |
||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||
Software licenses |
$ |
9,697 |
|
$ |
12,498 |
| ||
Service and maintenance |
|
29,843 |
|
|
28,728 |
| ||
Equipment and supplies |
|
13,108 |
|
|
15,292 |
| ||
Total revenues |
|
52,648 |
|
|
56,518 |
| ||
Cost of revenues: |
||||||||
Software licenses |
|
1,279 |
|
|
938 |
| ||
Service and maintenance |
|
15,649 |
|
|
13,981 |
| ||
Equipment and supplies |
|
10,085 |
|
|
11,097 |
| ||
Total cost of revenues |
|
27,013 |
|
|
26,016 |
| ||
Gross profit |
|
25,635 |
|
|
30,502 |
| ||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||
Sales and marketing |
|
13,403 |
|
|
14,216 |
| ||
Product development and engineering: |
||||||||
Product development and engineering |
|
9,089 |
|
|
10,387 |
| ||
Stock compensation expense |
|
95 |
|
|
307 |
| ||
General and administrative |
|
8,505 |
|
|
8,610 |
| ||
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
6,660 |
|
|
25,016 |
| ||
Total operating expenses |
|
37,752 |
|
|
58,536 |
| ||
Loss from operations |
|
(12,117 |
) |
|
(28,034 |
) | ||
Other expense, net |
|
(130 |
) |
|
(208 |
) | ||
Loss before cumulative effect of accounting change and provision for income taxes |
|
(12,247 |
) |
|
(28,242 |
) | ||
Provision for income taxes |
|
45 |
|
|
203 |
| ||
Loss before cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
(12,292 |
) |
|
(28,445 |
) | ||
Cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
(13,764 |
) |
|
|
| ||
Net loss |
$ |
(26,056 |
) |
$ |
(28,445 |
) | ||
Net loss per basic and diluted share: |
||||||||
Loss per share before cumulative effect of accounting change |
$ |
(0.79 |
) |
$ |
(1.98 |
) | ||
Cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
(0.88 |
) |
|
|
| ||
Net loss per basic and diluted share: |
$ |
(1.67 |
) |
$ |
(1.98 |
) | ||
Shares used in computing net loss per share: |
||||||||
Basic and diluted |
|
15,577 |
|
|
14,356 |
| ||
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Bottomline Technologies (de), Inc.
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
Nine Months Ended March 31, |
||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||
Operating activities: |
||||||||
Net loss |
$ |
(26,056 |
) |
$ |
(28,445 |
) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
13,764 |
|
|
|
| ||
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
6,660 |
|
|
25,016 |
| ||
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment |
|
1,977 |
|
|
2,470 |
| ||
Common stock accepted as payment from customer |
|
|
|
|
(811 |
) | ||
Provision for allowances on accounts receivable |
|
52 |
|
|
379 |
| ||
Stock compensation expense |
|
95 |
|
|
307 |
| ||
Deferred income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
40 |
| ||
Provision for allowances for obsolescence of inventory |
|
|
|
|
21 |
| ||
Loss (gain) on foreign exchange |
|
(93 |
) |
|
36 |
| ||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
|
1,963 |
|
|
2,337 |
| ||
Inventory, prepaid expenses, refundable taxes, and other current assets |
|
423 |
|
|
2,950 |
| ||
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, income taxes payable and deferred revenue and deposits |
|
(906 |
) |
|
(1,685 |
) | ||
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
(2,121 |
) |
|
2,615 |
| ||
Investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchases of property, plant and equipment, net |
|
(1,148 |
) |
|
(1,778 |
) | ||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(1,148 |
) |
|
(1,778 |
) | ||
Financing activities: |
||||||||
Payment of principal on long term debt |
|
(253 |
) |
|
|
| ||
Repurchase of common stock |
|
(952 |
) |
|
(1,776 |
) | ||
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan and exercise of stock options |
|
832 |
|
|
232 |
| ||
Proceeds from sale of common stock |
|
1,495 |
|
|
17,267 |
| ||
Payment of bank financing fees |
|
|
|
|
(25 |
) | ||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
1,122 |
|
|
15,698 |
| ||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
95 |
|
|
(11 |
) | ||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(2,052 |
) |
|
16,524 |
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
25,931 |
|
|
13,247 |
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ |
23,879 |
|
$ |
29,771 |
| ||
Schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities: |
||||||||
Issuance of common stock and common stock warrants |
$ |
|
|
$ |
750 |
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Bottomline Technologies (de), Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2003
Note 1Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals and adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the interim financial statements have been included. Operating results for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2003 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2003. For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on September 30, 2002.
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to comply with recent accounting pronouncements as more fully disclosed in Note 8.
Note 2Business Combinations
In May 2002, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of eVelocity Corporation (eVelocity). The consideration for the acquisition was approximately $3,100,000, consisting of $1,355,000 in cash, $1,573,000 in liabilities assumed and acquisition related costs. As a result of the acquisition, the Company recorded intangible assets of approximately $2,785,000, consisting of $1,142,000 of core technology, $1,007,000 of customer contracts and $636,000 of goodwill. The finite lived intangible assets, core technology and customer contracts, are being amortized over their estimated useful lives of five and ten years, respectively. Since eVelocity had only limited operations prior to the acquisition, pro-forma information has not been included.
Note 3Financing Arrangements
In December 2002, the Company extended, through December 27, 2003, its Loan and Security Agreement (Credit Facility), which provides for aggregate borrowings of up to $5.0 million and which requires the Company to maintain certain financial covenants. Eligible borrowings are based on a borrowing base calculation of the Companys qualifying accounts receivable, as defined in the Credit Facility. Borrowings bear interest at the banks prime rate (4.25% at March 31, 2003) plus one-half of one percent, are secured by substantially all U.S. owned assets of the Company and are due on the expiration date of the Credit Facility. The Credit Facility also provides for the aggregate issuance of up to $2.0 million in letters of credit for, and on behalf of, the Company. At March 31, 2003, a $2.0 million letter of credit had been issued to the Companys landlord as part of a lease arrangement for its corporate headquarters. The borrowing capacity under the Credit Facility is reduced by any outstanding letters of credit. There were no outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility at March 31, 2003.
In February 2003, Bottomline Europe renewed, through December 31, 2003, its Committed Overdraft Facility (Overdraft Facility), which provides for aggregate borrowings of up to 2.0 million British Pound Sterling. Borrowings under the Overdraft Facility bear interest at the banks base rate (3.75% at March 31, 2003) plus 2% and are due on December 31, 2003. Borrowings are secured by substantially all assets of Bottomline Europe. As disclosed in Note 12, Bottomline US has guaranteed repayment of any amounts borrowed under the Overdraft Facility, and at March 31, 2003, there were no outstanding borrowings under the Overdraft Facility.
5
Note 4Net Loss Per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share:
Three Months Ended March 31, |
Nine Months Ended March 31, |
|||||||||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
||||||||||||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||||||||||
Loss before cumulative effect of accounting change |
$ |
(2,225 |
) |
$ |
(9,056 |
) |
$ |
(12,292 |
) |
$ |
(28,445 |
) | ||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,764 |
) |
|
|
| ||||
Net loss |
$ |
(2,225 |
) |
$ |
(9,056 |
) |
$ |
(26,056 |
) |
$ |
(28,445 |
) | ||||
Denominator: |
||||||||||||||||
Denominator for basic and diluted loss per share-weighted average shares outstanding |
|
15,619 |
|
|
15,470 |
|
|
15,577 |
|
|
14,356 |
| ||||
Net loss per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Loss before cumulative effect of accounting change |
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
$ |
(0.59 |
) |
$ |
(0.79 |
) |
$ |
(1.98 |
) | ||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.88 |
) |
|
|
| ||||
Basic and diluted net loss per share |
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
$ |
(0.59 |
) |
$ |
(1.67 |
) |
$ |
(1.98 |
) | ||||
The effect of outstanding stock options and warrants are excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, as their effect would be anti-dilutive.
Note 5Comprehensive Loss
Comprehensive loss represents the Companys net loss plus the results of certain stockholders equity changes not reflected in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. The components of comprehensive loss, net of tax, are as follows:
Three Months Ended March 31, |
Nine Months Ended March 31, |
|||||||||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||||||
(in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ |
(2,225 |
) |
$ |
(9,056 |
) |
$ |
(26,056 |
) |
$ |
(28,445 |
) | ||||
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
(293 |
) |
|
(949 |
) |
|
735 |
|
|
806 |
| ||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) | ||||
Comprehensive loss |
$ |
(2,518 |
) |
$ |
(10,005 |
) |
$ |
(25,321 |
) |
$ |
(27,645 |
) | ||||
Note 6Operations by Industry Segments and Geographic Area
The Company is a global technology provider of financial software solutions and services that are sold to businesses and financial institutions. As permitted by the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 131, Disclosure About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, the Company has one reportable segment for financial statement purposes.
6
Net sales, based on the point of sale, not the location of the customer, were as follows:
Three Months Ended March 31, |
Nine Months Ended March 31, | |||||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
2003 |
2002 | |||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Sales to unaffiliated customers: |
||||||||||||
United States |
$ |
11,067 |
$ |
10,935 |
$ |
30,307 |
$ |
34,832 | ||||
United Kingdom |
|
7,577 |
|
7,057 |
|
22,341 |
|
21,686 | ||||
Total sales to unaffiliated customers: |
$ |
18,644 |
$ |
17,992 |
$ |
52,648 |
$ |
56,518 | ||||
At March 31, 2003, long-lived assets of approximately $16,148,000 and $15,153,000 were located in the United States and United Kingdom, respectively. At June 30, 2002, long-lived assets of approximately $18,500,000 and $33,700,000 were located in the United States and United Kingdom, respectively.
Note 7Income Taxes
In the three and nine month periods ended March 31, 2003, the Company incurred a substantial operating loss due, in part, to the amortization of intangible assets. Since substantial amortization expense associated with intangible assets will continue to be incurred for tax purposes, and since the Company has utilized its income tax loss carryback, the Company has maintained a full valuation allowance for its deferred tax assets since, based on the available evidence, it has been deemed more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Note 8Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Effective July 1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 142, intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives in proportion to the economic benefits consumed. Such intangible assets are subject to the impairment provisions of SFAS No. 144 (discussed below). Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are no longer amortized, but are instead tested for impairment annually, or more frequently when events or circumstances occur indicating that an asset might be impaired. Upon adoption of SFAS 142, the Company was required to perform a transitional impairment test on all indefinite lived intangible assets, including goodwill. As more fully discussed in Note 9, for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 the Company recorded a transitional impairment charge of $13.8 million associated with goodwill in the Bottomline Europe reporting unit, as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle.
Effective July 1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. SFAS No. 144 supersedes SFAS No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of and provides a single accounting model for the disposal of long-lived assets. The adoption of SFAS 144 did not have a material impact on our financial statements.
In November 2001, the Emerging Issues Task Force issued its consensus on EITF 01-14, Income Statement Characterization of Reimbursements Received for Out-of-Pocket Expenses Incurred, which requires that all out-of-pocket expenses billed to a customer be classified as revenue with the offsetting cost recorded as a cost of revenue. The Companys out of pocket expenses generally include, but are not limited to, employee travel related expenses. The Company had previously treated customer reimbursement for such expenses as a reduction to cost of revenue, and reclassified such amounts to service and maintenance revenue upon adoption. The adoption of EITF 01-14 did not have a material impact on our financial statements, and prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform with this pronouncement.
In April 2001, the Emerging Issues Task Force issued its consensus on EITF 00-25, Vendor Income Statement Characterization of Consideration Paid to a Reseller of the Vendors Products, whereby consideration from a vendor to a reseller of the vendors products is presumed to be a reduction of the vendors selling prices and, therefore, should be characterized as a reduction of revenue by the vendor. As a result of our adoption of EITF 00-25, we reclassified certain amounts paid to customers of our NetTransact software from cost of revenues and sales and marketing expense to a reduction of revenue. The adoption of EITF 00-25 did not have a material impact on our fiscal year 2001 or 2002 financial statements, and prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform with this pronouncement.
7
Effective January 1, 2003, the Company adopted SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. SFAS 146 addresses the financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and supersedes Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 94-3, Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring). SFAS 146 requires that costs associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when a liability is incurred, rather than at the date of an entitys commitment to an exit plan. The adoption of SFAS 146 did not have a material impact on our financial statements.
In November 2002, the Emerging Issues Task Force reached consensus on EITF 00-21, Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables, which addresses how to account for arrangements that may involve the delivery or performance of multiple products, services and/or rights to use assets. The guidance of EITF 00-21 will be applicable to agreements entered into in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2003 (fiscal 2004 for the Company) and companies will be permitted to apply the consensus guidance to all existing arrangements as the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. The Company will adopt EITF 00-21 on July 1, 2003 and we do not believe that it will have a material impact on our financial statements.
Effective January 1, 2003, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others (FIN 45). FIN 45 requires certain guarantees to be recorded at fair value and requires new disclosures related to guarantees. The initial recognition and measurement provisions of FIN 45 are effective, on a prospective basis, to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. Additionally, new disclosure requirements applicable to all guarantees subject to the scope of FIN 45, including guarantees arising prior to December 31, 2002, are effective for financial statements issued for periods ending after December 15, 2002. The adoption of FIN 45 did not have a material impact on our financial statements.
Effective January 1, 2003, the Company adopted SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock Based CompensationTransition and Disclosurean amendment of FASB Statement No. 123. SFAS 148 provides for alternative methods of voluntary transition to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation, and it requires more prominent disclosures, in both interim and annual financial statements, about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported financial results. SFAS 148 is effective for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2002, and for annual periods ending after December 15, 2002. The adoption of SFAS 148 did not have a material impact on our financial statements.
Note 9Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
As indicated in Note 8, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 142 on July 1, 2002, which required that a transitional impairment test be completed within the first year of adoption. The first phase of this test, which was completed by the Company in September 2002, required a comparison of the carrying value of each of the Companys reporting units to the reporting units fair value. To the extent that the carrying value of any reporting unit exceeded its respective fair value, an indication of potential impairment was deemed to exist and a second phase of the transitional impairment test was required to determine the actual amount of impairment.
The Company has two reporting units, represented by its two geographic operating segmentsBottomline US and Bottomline Europe. Based on the results of the first phase of the transitional impairment test, the Company was required to perform the second phase of the test for the Bottomline Europe reporting unit, which was completed in the quarter ended December 31, 2002. Based on the results of the phase two assessment, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $13.8 million resulting from the impairment of goodwill in Bottomline Europe. In accordance with the transition provisions of SFAS 142, this amount has been reported as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle and has been recorded retroactively to the quarter ended September 30, 2002, the first quarter of fiscal year 2003.
At March 31, 2003, the carrying value of the Companys goodwill in the Bottomline US and Bottomline Europe reporting units was approximately $7,156,000 and $10,198,000, respectively. At June 30, 2002, the carrying value of the Companys goodwill in the Bottomline US and Bottomline Europe reporting units was approximately $7,140,000 and $23,611,000, respectively.
The following tables set forth the information for intangible assets subject to amortization and for intangible assets not subject to amortization under SFAS 142:
8
As of March 31, 2003 | ||||||||||
Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net Carrying Value | ||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||
Amortized intangible assets: |
||||||||||
Customer lists |
$ |
17,024 |
$ |
(14,659 |
) |
$ |
2,365 | |||
Core technology |
|
12,384 |
|
(9,249 |
) |
|
3,135 | |||
Customer contracts |
|
1,007 |
|
(112 |
) |
|
895 | |||
Total |
$ |
30,415 |
$ |
(24,020 |
) |
$ |
6,395 | |||
Unamortized intangible assets: |
||||||||||
Goodwill |
|
17,354 | ||||||||
Total intangible assets |
$ |
23,749 | ||||||||
As of June 30, 2002 | ||||||||||
Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net Carrying Value | ||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||
Amortized intangible assets: |
||||||||||
Customer lists |
$ |
16,436 |
$ |
(10,044 |
) |
$ |
6,392 | |||
Core technology |
|
12,245 |
|
(6,811 |
) |
|
5,434 | |||
Customer contracts |
|
1,007 |
|
(44 |
) |
|
963 | |||
Total |
$ |
29,688 |
$ |
(16,899 |
) |
$ |
12,789 | |||
Unamortized intangible assets: |
||||||||||
Goodwill |
|
30,751 | ||||||||
Total intangible assets |
$ |
43,540 | ||||||||
The change in the carrying value of goodwill since June 30, 2002 was due to the impairment charge recorded in the Bottomline Europe reporting unit as previously described, and the effect of foreign currency translation adjustments.
Estimated amortization expense for the current fiscal year, and each of the five succeeding fiscal years, is as follows:
In thousands | |||
2003 |
$ |
8,785 | |
2004 |
|
2,656 | |
2005 |
|
561 | |
2006 |
|
339 | |
2007 |
|
328 | |
2008 |
|
103 |
Upon adoption of SFAS 142, $2,502,000 that had previously been capitalized and reported as the separate intangible asset assembled workforce was reclassified to goodwill, since such amounts no longer meet the requirements of an intangible asset that can be separately stated.
Upon adoption of SFAS 142, the Company ceased amortization of goodwill and the amounts that were reclassified to goodwill. The following table summarizes and reconciles the Companys reported loss and loss per share, before the cumulative
9
effect of a change in accounting principle, for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002. The comparable prior period amounts have been adjusted to exclude amortization expense relating to goodwill and other intangible assets that upon adoption of SFAS 142 are no longer amortized:
Three Months Ended March 31, |
Nine Months Ended March 31, |
|||||||||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
||||||||||||||||
Loss before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, as originally reported |
$ |
(2,225 |
) |
$ |
(9,056 |
) |
$ |
(12,292 |
) |
$ |
(28,445 |
) | ||||
Add back: goodwill amortization |
|
|
|
|
6,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
18,998 |
| ||||
Adjusted loss, before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle |
$ |
(2,225 |
) |
$ |
(2,754 |
) |
$ |
(12,292 |
) |
$ |
(9,447 |
) | ||||
Basic and diluted loss per share, before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, as originally reported |
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
$ |
(0.59 |
) |
$ |
(0.79 |
) |
$ |
(1.98 |
) | ||||
Add back: goodwill amortization |
|
|
|
|
0.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.32 |
| ||||
Adjusted basic and diluted loss per share before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle |
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
$ |
(0.79 |
) |
$ |
(0.66 |
) | ||||
Note 10Severance and Exit Costs
During fiscal year 2003, the Company implemented several expense reduction initiatives to align its cost structure with existing market conditions. As part of this plan, the Company consolidated its workforce, in both the US and Europe, and closed a facility in the US. In connection with these initiatives, the Company recorded charges of approximately $574,000 in the quarter ended September 30, 2002 and approximately $468,000 in the quarter ended December 31, 2002. At March 31, 2003, approximately $253,000 of severance and facility exit costs remained accrued for payment in future periods.
Note 11Stockholders Equity
Common Stock
In March 2003, the Company sold 270,000 shares of its common stock to General Atlantic Partners, LLC (General Atlantic), a global private equity investment firm and stockholder of the Company, for approximately $1.5 million in gross proceeds. The sale of an additional 730,000 shares was provided for by the agreement with General Atlantic but will not be completed since the requisite clearance could not be obtained from Nasdaq to effect such sale without stockholder approval.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, (APB 25) and related Interpretations in accounting for its employee stock options. Under APB 25, since the exercise price of the Companys employee stock options equals the market price of the underlying stock on the date of the grant, and, in the case of the Companys stock purchase plans since the plans are non-compensatory, no compensation expense is recorded in the financial statements. The stock-based employee compensation plans are described more fully in the footnotes included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on September 30, 2002.
10
The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation, to its stock-based employee compensation.
Three Months Ended March 31, |
Nine Months Ended March 31, |
|||||||||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
||||||||||||||||
Net loss, as reported |
$ |
(2,225 |
) |
$ |
(9,056 |
) |
$ |
(26,056 |
) |
$ |
(28,445 |
) | ||||
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income |
|
31 |
|
|
103 |
|
|
95 |
|
|
307 |
| ||||
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects |
|
(2,019 |
) |
|
(2,869 |
) |
|
(6,475 |
) |
|
(8,722 |
) | ||||
Pro-forma net loss |
$ |
(4,213 |
) |
$ |
(11,822 |
) |
$ |
(32,436 |
) |
$ |
(36,860 |
) | ||||
Basic and diluted net loss per share, as reported |
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
$ |
(0.59 |
) |
$ |
(1.67 |
) |
$ |
(1.98 |
) | ||||
Pro-forma basic and diluted net loss per share |
$ |
(0.27 |
) |
$ |
(0.76 |
) |
$ |
(2.08 |
) |
$ |
(2.57 |
) | ||||
Note 12Guarantees
The Company generally offers a standard warranty on its products and services, specifying that its software products will perform in accordance with published product specifications and that any professional services will conform with applicable specifications and industry standards. To date, the Company has not had any significant warranty claims against its software products and there were no accruals for product warranties at March 31, 2003.
As disclosed in Note 3, Bottomline Europe is a party to an Overdraft Facility, which provides for aggregate borrowings of up to 2.0 million British Pound Sterling. Bottomline US has guaranteed repayment of any amounts borrowed under the Overdraft Facility and at March 31, 2003, there were no outstanding borrowings under the Overdraft Facility.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This quarterly report contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The statements contained in this report that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Without limiting the foregoing, the words may, will, should, could, expects, plans, intends, anticipates, believes, estimates, predicts, potential, continue and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements included in this quarterly report are based on information available to us up to, and including, the date of this document, and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements, even if our estimates change. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth below under Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Certain Factors That May Affect Future Results and elsewhere in this quarterly report. You should carefully review those factors and also carefully review the risks outlined in other documents that we file from time to time with the SEC.
Overview
We provide a comprehensive set of solutions for financial resource management (FRM). Our software products and services enable organizations to more effectively make and collect payments, send and receive invoices and conduct electronic
11
banking activities. We offer both software designed to run on-site at the customers location and hosted solutions. Our products allow our customers to leverage the Internet in automating existing operations while increasing security and fraud avoidance. They complement our customers existing information systems, accounting applications and banking functions. Based on a customers specific needs, we also provide professional services for installation, training, consulting and product enhancement, as well as related equipment and supplies. We market our products globally with a particular focus on the United States and, through Bottomline Europe, the United Kingdom. We have over 5,500 customers, including over 50 of the Fortune 100 and over 90 of the FTSE (Financial Times) 100 companies.
We have one reportable segment for financial statement purposes, as permitted by the provisions of SFAS No. 131, Disclosure About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. Since our acquisition of Bottomline Europe on August 28, 2000, we have had operations in the United Kingdom in addition to the United States.
Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates
We believe that several accounting policies are important to understanding our historical and future performance. We refer to such policies as critical because these specific areas generally require us to make judgments and estimates about matters that are uncertain at the time we make the estimate, and different estimateswhich also would have been reasonablecould have been used, which could have resulted in different financial results.
The critical accounting policies we identified in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K related to revenue recognition, intangible assets and our equity investments. It is important that the historical discussion below be read in conjunction with our critical accounting policies as discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002, and with the critical accounting policy updates that follow relating to goodwill impairment and our equity investments.
Goodwill Impairment
Effective July 1, 2002, we adopted the provisions of SFAS 142 relating to goodwill and intangible assets. We were required to perform a transitional impairment test upon adoption to determine the amount of goodwill impairment, if any. Testing for impairment under SFAS 142 is a two-step process. The first step requires a calculation of fair value of each of our reporting units. Any reporting unit whose calculated fair value is less than its respective carrying value is deemed impaired and the second step of the impairment test is required. The second step of the impairment test requires fair value estimates of identifiable assets and liabilities, after which the implied fair value of goodwill is determined. Any excess of goodwill carrying value over its implied fair value is deemed to represent the amount of impairment. In connection with our adoption of SFAS 142, we recorded an impairment charge of $13.8 million associated with goodwill in the Bottomline Europe reporting unit. This amount has been recorded as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, retroactive to the quarter ended September 30, 2002, the first quarter of fiscal year 2003.
We utilized an outside valuation firm to assist us in calculating the required fair value amounts in connection with our impairment review. The principal component of each fair value calculation is the determination of discounted future cash flows, and there are a number of variables that we considered for purposes of projecting these future cash flows. There is inherent uncertainty involved with this estimation process, andwhile our estimates are consistent with our internal planning assumptionsthe ultimate accuracy of these estimates is only verifiable over time. The particularly sensitive components of these estimates include, but are not limited to:
· | the selection of an appropriate discount rate |
· | our projected overall revenue growth and mix of revenue |
· | our gross margin estimates (which are highly dependent on our mix of revenue) |
· | the level of Bottomline US products that will be sold by Bottomline Europe |
· | our software product life cycles |
· | the attrition rate of our customers, particularly those who contribute to our recurring revenue streams (such as software maintenance) |
· | our planned level of operating expenses, and |
· | our effective tax rate |
The use of different assumptions or projections, in some or all of the areas noted above, would likely have resulted in different fair value results, thus affecting our determination of overall goodwill impairment.
12
Equity Investments
We have equity investments in non-publicly traded companies in which we do not exercise significant influence. Such investments are included within Other Assets in our condensed consolidated balance sheet and are accounted for on a cost basis. Under the cost method of accounting, investments in non-publicly traded companies are carried at cost and are adjusted only for other than temporary declines in their fair values. During the quarter ended March 31, 2003, in connection with our review of the carrying value of one of these investments, we concluded that impairment, that we judged to be other than temporary, had occurred. We recorded an impairment loss of $417,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, thus reducing that investments carrying value to approximately $33,000.
We periodically review the carrying value of all of our equity investments. This review considers both qualitative and quantitative factors, including the investees financial position, results of operations and cash flows, operating trends and ratios, and, as available, forecasts and projections. We also consider the investees access to capital and its financing alternatives. Our review and analysis is highly dependent on receiving timely and accurate financial information from the investees. Should our analysis or conclusion relative to impairment be incorrect, our results of operations could be affected.
The remaining carrying value of all of our equity investments as of March 31, 2003 was $283,000.
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended March 31, 2003 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2002
Revenues
Total revenues increased by $600,000 to $18.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $18.0 million in the three months ended March 31, 2002, an increase of 3%. This increase occurred principally in Bottomline Europe revenues and was due to an increase in the foreign currency exchange rate at which the financial results of Bottomline Europe are translated from pounds sterling to US dollars. Revenues, based on the point of sales, rather than the location of the customer, were $11.0 million and $7.6 million in the United States and United Kingdom, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2003. Revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2002 were $10.9 million and $7.1 million in the United States and United Kingdom, respectively.
Software Licenses. Software license revenues decreased by $600,000 to $3.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $4.2 million in the three months ended March 31, 2002, a decrease of 14%. Software license revenues represented 19% of total revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to 24% of total revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2002. The decrease in software license revenues was due to a reduction in software license revenues generated by Bottomline US offset by an increase in the foreign currency exchange rate of Bottomline Europe. Based on current product plans, we anticipate that software license revenues, as a percentage of total revenues, will remain consistent during the remainder of the fiscal year.
Service and Maintenance. Service and maintenance revenues increased by $1.5 million to $10.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $9.1 million in the three months ended March 31, 2002, an increase of 16%. The increase in service and maintenance revenues was primarily due to the revenue contribution from our Legal e-billing offering, which we introduced in May 2002 following our acquisition of substantially all of the assets of eVelocity Corporation, an increase in the foreign currency exchange rate of Bottomline Europe and, to a lesser extent, an increase in software maintenance revenues generated by Bottomline US. Service and maintenance revenues represented 57% of total revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to 51% of total revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2002. Based on current product plans, we anticipate that service and maintenance revenues will remain consistent, as a percentage of total revenues, during the remainder of the fiscal year.
Equipment and Supplies. Equipment and supplies revenues decreased by approximately $200,000 to $4.5 million in the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $4.7 million in the three months ended March 31, 2002, a decrease of 4%. The decrease in equipment and supplies revenues was attributable to a decrease in equipment and supplies revenues generated by Bottomline US and Bottomline Europe, offset in part by an increase in the foreign currency exchange rate of Bottomline Europe. Equipment and supplies revenues represented 24% of total revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to 26% of total revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2002. Based on current product plans, we anticipate that equipment and supplies revenue levels will not change significantly during the remainder of the fiscal year.
Cost of Revenues
Software Licenses. Software license costs increased by $151,000 to $425,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $274,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2002. Software license costs were 12% of software license revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to 6% of software license revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2002. The increase in software license costs as a percentage of software license revenues was primarily due to an increased share of software
13
license revenues generated by Bottomline Europe and the increase of certain third party software used with some of our US products, on which we pay a royalty. Software license revenues generated by Bottomline Europe have historically carried a lower gross margin than Bottomline US software license revenues due to the cost of third party software that is incorporated into and sold with the Bottomline Europe software products. We anticipate that software license costs, as a percentage of software license revenues, will not change significantly during the remainder of the fiscal year.
Service and Maintenance. Service and maintenance costs increased by approximately $900,000 to $5.0 million in the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $4.1 million in the three months ended March 31, 2002, an increase of 22%. Service and maintenance costs were 47% of service and maintenance revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to 45% of service and maintenance revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2002. The increase in service and maintenance costs is attributable to an increase in US development personnel who were utilized to perform billable work, the cost of which is included in services cost of revenues, and an increase in the foreign currency exchange rate of Bottomline Europe. We anticipate that service and maintenance costs, as a percentage of service and maintenance revenues, will remain consistent during the remainder of the fiscal year.
Equipment and Supplies. Equipment and supplies costs increased by approximately $200,000 to $3.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $3.4 million in the three months ended March 31, 2002, an increase of 6%. Equipment and supplies costs were 81% of equipment and supplies revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to 73% of equipment and supplies revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2002. The increase in equipment and supplies costs as a percentage of equipment and supplies revenues was attributable to reduced profit margins of Bottomline Europe, primarily resulting from an increase in shipping costs which carry no gross margin, and, to a lesser extent, higher third party costs associated with supplies that Bottomline Europe resells. Bottomline Europe began experiencing higher purchase costs during the current fiscal year and our expectation is that this higher cost structure will continue. We anticipate that equipment and supplies costs, as a percentage of equipment and supplies revenues, will remain consistent during the remainder of the fiscal year.
Operating Expenses
Sales and Marketing:
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries and other related costs for sales and marketing personnel, sales commissions, travel, public relations, marketing materials and trade shows. Sales and marketing expenses decreased by approximately $700,000 to $4.0 million in the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $4.7 million in the three months ended March 31, 2002, a decrease of 15%. Sales and marketing expenses were 22% of total revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to 26% of total revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2002. The majority of the decrease in sales and marketing expenses was the result of decreased personnel costs, including salaries and commissions, as a result of reduced headcount and reduced revenues in Bottomline US, offset by an increase in the foreign currency exchange rate of Bottomline Europe. We anticipate that sales and marketing expenses, as a percentage of revenues, will remain consistent during the remainder of the fiscal year.
Product Development and Engineering:
Product Development and Engineering. Product development and engineering expenses consist primarily of personnel costs to support core product development, which continues to be focused on enhancements and revisions to existing Bottomline products based on customer feedback and marketplace demands. Product development and engineering expenses decreased by approximately $800,000 to $2.5 million in the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $3.3 million in the three months ended March 31, 2002, a decrease of 24%. The decrease in product development and engineering expenses was primarily the result of decreased personnel costs attributable to a reduction in headcount in Bottomline US and an increase in the utilization of development personnel from core development work to billable customer work, the cost of which is classified as a component of cost of revenue, offset in part by an increase in Bottomline Europes foreign currency exchange rate. Product development and engineering expenses were 13% of total revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to 18% of total revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2002. We anticipate that product development and engineering expenses, as a percentage of revenues, will remain consistent during the remainder of the fiscal year.
Stock Compensation Expense. In connection with our acquisition of Flashpoint, Inc. in August 2000, we assumed all of the outstanding common stock options of Flashpoint, which were exchanged for our common stock options, and recorded deferred compensation of $1.3 million at the date of acquisition relating to the intrinsic value of the unvested options. The deferred compensation is being amortized to expense over the remaining vesting period of the options. Stock compensation expense decreased by $72,000 to approximately $31,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $103,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2002, a decrease of 70%. The decrease in stock compensation expense was due principally to the forfeiture of non-vested stock options as a result of employee separations and the completion of the vesting period for certain of the stock options. We anticipate that stock compensation expense will not change significantly during the remainder of the fiscal year.
14
General and Administrative:
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and other related costs for operations and finance employees and legal and accounting services. General and administrative expenses decreased by approximately $100,000 to $2.7 million in the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $2.8 million in the three months ended March 31, 2002, a decrease of 4%. The decrease in general and administrative expenses was due primarily to reduced salaries and facilities related costs in Bottomline Europe, partially offset by an increase in the foreign currency exchange rate of Bottomline Europe. General and administrative expenses were 14% of total revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to 15% of total revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2002. We anticipate that general and administrative costs, as a percentage of revenues, will remain consistent during the remainder of the fiscal year.
Amortization of Intangible Assets:
Amortization of Intangible Assets. Amortization of intangible assets related to our acquisitions decreased by $6.1 million to $2.2 million in the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $8.3 million in the three months ended March 31, 2002. The decrease in amortization expense is due to the adoption of SFAS 142, effective July 1, 2002. Under SFAS 142, goodwill is no longer subject to recurring amortization but instead is tested for impairment annually, or more frequently when events or circumstances occur indicating that an asset might be impaired. We expect to incur a consistent amount of amortization expense each quarter for the remainder of the fiscal year.
Other Income (Expense), Net:
Other income (expense), net consists of interest income, interest expense, gains and losses on our equity investments and foreign currency transaction gains and losses. Other income (expense), net decreased by $458,000 to other expense, net of $412,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2003 from other income, net of $46,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2002. The other expense in the three months ended March 31, 2003 was primarily the result of a write-down of an equity investment in the amount of approximately $417,000. The investment was in a non-public entity, accounted for under the cost method, in which indicators of impairment which we judged to be other than temporary became present during the period. The remaining carrying value of this investment is approximately $33,000 at March 31, 2003 and the remaining carrying value of all of our equity investments is approximately $283,000 at March 31, 2003.
Provision for Income Taxes:
The provision for income taxes was $15,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared with a provision for income taxes of $113,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2002. At March 31, 2003, the provision for income taxes consisted of a small amount of US state tax expense, which will be incurred irrespective of our net operating loss position. At March 31, 2002, the provision consisted of a small amount of US state tax expense and tax expense of Bottomline Europe. At March 31, 2003, we had utilized our income tax loss carryback and, accordingly, maintained a full valuation allowance for our deferred tax assets since, based on the available evidence, it was deemed more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Results of Operations
Nine Months Ended March 31, 2003 Compared to the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2002
Revenues
Total revenues decreased by $3.9 million to $52.6 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2003 from $56.5 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2002, a decrease of 7%. The decrease in revenues was attributable to a decrease in Bottomline US revenues, particularly software license revenues, offset in part by an increase in the foreign currency exchange rate at which the financial results of Bottomline Europe are translated from pounds sterling to US dollars. Revenues, based on the point of sales, rather than the location of the customer, were $30.3 million and $22.3 million in the United States and United Kingdom, respectively, for the nine months ended March 31, 2003. Revenues for the nine months ended March 31, 2002 were $34.8 million and $21.7 million in the United States and United Kingdom, respectively.
Software Licenses. Software license revenues decreased by $2.8 million to $9.7 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2003 from $12.5 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2002, a decrease of 22%. Software license revenues represented 18% of total revenues in the nine months ended March 31, 2003 compared to 22% of total revenues in the nine months ended March 31, 2002. The decrease in software license revenues was due predominantly to a reduction in software license revenues generated by Bottomline US and, to a lesser extent, by Bottomline Europe, offset in part by an increase in the foreign currency exchange rate of Bottomline Europe.
15
Service and Maintenance. Service and maintenance revenues increased by $1.1 million to $29.8 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2003 from $28.7 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2002, an increase of 4%. The increase in service and maintenance revenues was primarily due to the revenue contribution from our Legal e-billing offering which we introduced in May 2002 following our acquisition of substantially all of the assets of eVelocity Corporation and an increase in the foreign currency exchange rate of Bottomline Europe. Service and maintenance revenues represented 57% of total revenues in the nine months ended March 31, 2003 compared to 51% of total revenues in the nine months ended March 31, 2002.
Equipment and Supplies. Equipment and supplies revenues decreased by approximately $2.2 million to $13.1 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2003 from $15.3 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2002, a decrease of 14%. The decrease in equipment and supplies revenues was attributable to a decrease in revenues of both Bottomline US and Bottomline Europe during the nine months ended March 31, 2002, offset in part by an increase in the foreign currency exchange rate of Bottomline Europe. Equipment and supplies sales represented 25% of total revenues in the nine months ended March 31, 2003 compared to 27% of total revenues in the nine months ended March 31, 2002.
Cost of Revenues
Software Licenses. Software license costs increased by $341,000 to $1,279,000 in the nine months ended March 31, 2003 from $938,000 in the nine months ended March 31, 2002. Software license costs were 13% of software license revenues in the nine months ended March 31, 2003 compared to 8% of software license revenues in the nine months ended March 31, 2002. The increase in software license costs as a percentage of software revenues for the nine months ended March 31, 2003 was primarily due to the increase of certain third party software used with some of our Bottomline US products and an increased share of software revenues generated by Bottomline Europe. Software revenues generated by Bottomline Europe have historically carried a lower gross margin than Bottomline US software revenues due to the cost of third party software, which is incorporated into and sold with the Bottomline Europe software products.
Service and Maintenance. Service and maintenance costs increased by approximately $1.6 million to $15.6 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2003 from $14.0 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2002, an increase of 11%. Service and maintenance costs were 52% of service and maintenance revenues in the nine months ended March 31, 2003 compared to 49% of service and maintenance revenues in the nine months ended March 31, 2002. The increase in service and maintenance costs is attributable to an increase in US development personnel who were utilized to perform billable customer work, the cost of which is included as services cost of revenues. Service and maintenance costs for the nine months ended March 31, 2003 also included employee severance and separation related costs as a result of cost reduction initiatives implemented by both Bottomline US and Bottomline Europe during the first six months of fiscal 2003.
Equipment and Supplies. Equipment and supplies costs decreased by approximately $1.0 million to $10.1 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2003 from $11.1 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2002, a decrease of 9%. Equipment and supplies costs were 77% of equipment and supplies revenues in the nine months ended March 31, 2003 compared to 73% of equipment and supplies revenues in the nine months ended March 31, 2002. The decrease in equipment and supplies costs was attributable to the associated decrease in equipment and supplies revenues. The increase in equipment and supplies costs as a percentage of equipment and supplies revenues was attributable to reduced profit margins of Bottomline Europe, resulting from an increase in shipping costs which carry no gross margin and, to a lesser extent, from higher third party costs associated with supplies that Bottomline Europe resells. Bottomline Europe began experiencing higher purchase costs in the current fiscal year and our expectation is that this higher cost structure will continue.
Operating Expenses
Sales and Marketing:
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries and other related costs for sales and marketing personnel, sales commissions, travel, public relations, marketing materials and trade shows. Sales and marketing expenses decreased by approximately $800,000 to $13.4 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2003 from $14.2 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2002, a decrease of 6%. Sales and marketing expenses were 25% of total revenues in the nine months ended March 31, 2003 and March 31, 2002. Sales and marketing expenses decreased in the US as a result of a reduction in salaries and commissions, resulting from reduced headcount and lower revenues. These reductions were partially offset with employee severance and separation related costs as a result of cost reduction initiatives implemented by Bottomline US and Bottomline Europe during the first six months of fiscal 2003 and by an increase in the foreign currency exchange rate of Bottomline Europe.
Product Development and Engineering:
Product Development and Engineering. Product development and engineering expenses consist primarily of personnel costs to support core product development, which continues to be focused on enhancements and revisions to existing Bottomline
16
products based on customer feedback and marketplace demands. Product development and engineering expenses decreased by approximately $1.3 million to $9.1 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2003 from $10.4 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2002, a decrease of 13%. The decrease in product development and engineering expenses was due to a reduction in salaries and employee related costs as a result of reduced US headcount and a shift in focus for certain US personnel from core development work to billable customer work, the cost of which is classified as a component of cost of revenues, offset in part by an increase in the foreign currency exchange rate of Bottomline Europe. The reductions in cost were partially offset by employee severance and separation related costs as a result of cost reduction initiatives implemented during the first six months of fiscal 2003. Product development and engineering expenses were 17% of total revenues in the nine months ended March 31, 2003 compared to 18% of total revenues in the nine months ended March 31, 2002.
Stock Compensation Expense. In connection with our acquisition of Flashpoint, Inc. in August 2000, we assumed all of the outstanding common stock options of Flashpoint, which were exchanged for our common stock options, and recorded deferred compensation of $1.3 million at the date of acquisition relating to the intrinsic value of the unvested options. The deferred compensation is being amortized to expense over the remaining vesting period of the options. Stock compensation expense decreased by $212,000 to approximately $95,000 in the nine months ended March 31, 2003 from $307,000 in the nine months ended March 31, 2002, a decrease of 69%. The decrease in stock compensation expense was due principally to the forfeiture of unvested stock options as a result of employee separations and the completion of the vesting period for certain of the stock options.
General and Administrative:
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and other related costs for operations and finance employees and legal and accounting services. General and administrative expenses decreased by approximately $100,000 to $8.5 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2003 from $8.6 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2002, a decrease of 1%. The decrease in general and administrative expenses was primarily attributable to a reduction in salaries and related costs as a result of cost reduction initiatives implemented in Bottomline US and Bottomline Europe, offset in part by an increase in the foreign currency exchange rate of Bottomline Europe. General and administrative expenses were 16% of total revenues in the nine months ended March 31, 2003 compared to 15% of total revenues in the nine months ended March 31, 2002.
Amortization of Intangible Assets:
Amortization of Intangible Assets. Amortization of intangible assets related to our acquisitions decreased by $18.3 million to $6.7 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2003 from $25.0 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2002. The decrease in amortization expense is due to the adoption of SFAS 142, effective July 1, 2002. Under SFAS 142, goodwill is no longer subject to recurring amortization but instead is tested for impairment annually, or more frequently when events or circumstances occur indicating that an asset might be impaired.
Other Expense, Net:
Other expense, net consists of interest income, interest expense, gains and losses on our equity investments and foreign currency transaction gains and losses. Other expense, net decreased by $78,000 to other expense, net of $130,000 in the nine months ended March 31, 2003 from other expense, net of $208,000 in the nine months ended March 31, 2002. The other expense, net included the write-down of an equity investment in the amount of approximately $417,000 and $450,000 in the nine months ended March 31, 2003 and March 31, 2002, respectively. During each period, indicators of investment impairment, which we judged to be other than temporary, became present. The investment is in a non-public entity accounted for under the cost method. The remaining carrying value of this investment is approximately $33,000 at March 31, 2003 and the remaining carrying value of all of our equity investments is approximately $283,000 at March 31, 2003.
Provision for Income Taxes:
The provision for income taxes was approximately $45,000 in the nine months ended March 31, 2003 compared with a provision for income taxes of approximately $203,000 in the nine months ended March 31, 2002. At March 31, 2003, the provision for income taxes consisted of a small amount of US state tax expense, which will be incurred irrespective of our net operating loss position. At March 31, 2002, the provision consisted of a small amount of US state tax expense and tax expense of Bottomline Europe. At March 31, 2003, we had utilized our income tax loss carryback and, accordingly, maintained a full valuation allowance for our deferred tax assets since, based on the available evidence, it was deemed more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have financed our operations primarily from cash provided by the sale of our common stock and operating activities. We had net working capital of $17.5 million at March 31, 2003, which included cash and cash equivalents totaling $23.9 million.
17
In December 2002, the Company extended, through December 27, 2003, its Loan and Security Agreement (Credit Facility), which provides for aggregate borrowings of up to $5.0 million and which requires the Company to maintain certain financial covenants. Eligible borrowings are based on a borrowing base calculation of the Companys qualifying accounts receivable, as defined in the Credit Facility. Borrowings bear interest at the banks prime rate (4.25% at March 31, 2003) plus one-half of one percent, are secured by substantially all U.S. owned assets of the Company and are due on the expiration date of the Credit Facility. The Credit Facility also provides for the aggregate issuance of up to $2.0 million in letters of credit for, and on behalf of, the Company. At March 31, 2003, a $2.0 million letter of credit had been issued to the Companys landlord as part of a lease arrangement for its corporate headquarters. The borrowing capacity under the Credit Facility is reduced by any outstanding letters of credit. As of March 31, 2003, there were no outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility and we were in compliance with all financial covenants.
In February 2003, Bottomline Europe renewed, through December 31, 2003, its Committed Overdraft Facility (Overdraft Facility), which provides for borrowings of up to 2.0 million British Pound Sterling. Borrowings under this Overdraft Facility bear interest at the banks base rate (3.75% at March 31, 2003) plus 2% and are due on December 31, 2003. Borrowings are secured by substantially all assets of Bottomline Europe. There were no outstanding borrowings under the Overdraft Facility at March 31, 2003.
Cash used in operating activities was $2.1 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2003 and cash provided by operating activities was $2.6 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2002. Net cash used in operating activities for the nine months ended March 31, 2003 was primarily the result of the net loss, offset by the cumulative effect of an accounting change, amortization of intangible assets, depreciation of property and equipment and a decrease in accounts receivable.
Net cash used in investing activities was $1.1 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2003 and $1.8 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2002. Cash was used in the nine months ended March 31, 2003 to acquire property and equipment.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $1.1 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2003 and $15.7 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2002. Cash provided by financing activities was primarily the result of the issuance and sale of common stock to General Atlantic Partners LLC, proceeds received from the exercise of stock options and the issuance of common stock pursuant to our employee stock purchase plan, offset in part by the repurchase of our common stock under our stock repurchase program and the payment of principal on outstanding debt.
We lease our principal office facility in Portsmouth, New Hampshire under a non-cancelable operating lease. In addition to the base term, we have the option to extend the term by two five-year periods. Rent payments are fixed for the term of the lease, subject to increases each year, based on fluctuations in the consumer price index. We are additionally obligated to pay certain incremental operating expenses over the base rent. We also lease facilities in San Francisco, California; New York, New York; Great Neck, New York; and Boston, Massachusetts. We own office space in Reading, England and lease facilities in Reading, London, and Manchester, England; Belfast, Ireland; and Glasgow, Scotland. All of our facility related leases expire by fiscal year 2010, with the exception of the lease of our principal office facility in Portsmouth, New Hampshire, which expires in fiscal year 2012. We sublease office space in several of our offices.
In addition, we have various operating leases for office equipment and vehicles. Our estimated lease obligations for facilities, office equipment and vehicles for this year, years 2 through 3, years 4 through 5, and greater than 5 years are $2.6 million, $4.1 million, $3.5 million and $7.6 million, respectively.
During the nine months ended March 31, 2003, we did not engage in:
| material off-balance sheet activities, including the use of structured finance, special purpose or variable interest entities; |
| material trading activities in non-exchange traded commodity contracts; or |
| transactions with persons or entities that benefit from their non-independent relationship with us. |
We believe that our cash and cash equivalents on hand will be sufficient to meet our working capital requirements for at least the next twelve months. We also may receive additional investments from, and make investments in, other companies.
CERTAIN FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below before making an investment decision involving our common stock. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing our company. Additional risks and uncertainties may also impair our business operations. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations would likely suffer. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could fall, and you may lose all or part of the money you paid to buy our common stock.
18
The slowdown in the economy has affected the market for information technology solutions, including our products and services, and if this slowdown continues our future financial results could be materially adversely affected
As a result of continuing unfavorable economic conditions and reduced capital spending by our customers and potential customers, demand for our products and services has been adversely affected. This has resulted in decreased revenues, primarily software license revenues, and a decline in our growth rate. To date, the US marketplace has been specifically affected but there can be no assurance that this trend will not extend to the UK marketplace. Our future results will be materially and adversely affected if this slowdown continues or worsens and our revenues continue to be adversely impacted. In connection with the economic slowdown, we have implemented several cost reduction initiatives in an attempt to improve our profitability. If current economic conditions continue or worsen, these cost reductions may prove to be inadequate and we may experience a material adverse impact on our business, operating results, and financial condition.
Our common stock has experienced and may continue to undergo extreme market price and volume fluctuations
Stock markets in general, and The NASDAQ Stock Market in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations, particularly in recent years. Broad market fluctuations of this type may adversely affect the market price of our common stock. The stock prices for many companies in the technology sector have experienced wide fluctuations that often have been unrelated to their operating performance. The market price of our common stock has experienced and may continue to undergo extreme fluctuations due to a variety of factors, including:
| general and industry-specific business, economic and market conditions; |
| actual or anticipated fluctuations in operating results, including those arising as a result of any impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets related to our past acquisitions; |
| changes in or our failure to meet analysts or investors estimates or expectations; |
| public announcements concerning us, including announcements of litigation, our competitors or our industry; |
| introductions of new products or services or announcements of significant contracts by us or our competitors; |
| acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures, or capital commitments by us or our competitors; |
| adverse developments in patent or other proprietary rights; and |
| announcements of technological innovations by our competitors. |
Our fixed costs may lead to operating results below analyst or investor expectations if our revenues are below anticipated levels, which could adversely affect the market price of our common stock
A significant percentage of our expenses, particularly personnel and facilities costs, are relatively fixed and based in part on anticipated revenue levels. We have undergone, and are currently experiencing, slowing growth rates due to the current economic climate. A decline in revenues without a corresponding and timely slowdown in expense growth could continue to negatively affect our business. Significant revenue shortfalls in any quarter may cause significant declines in operating results since we may be unable to reduce spending in a timely manner.
Quarterly operating results that are below the expectations of public market analysts could adversely affect the market price of our common stock. Factors that could cause fluctuations in our operating results include the following:
| economic conditions which may affect our customers and potential customers budgets for information technology expenditures; |
| the timing of orders and longer sales cycles, particularly due to the increased average sales price of our software solutions; |
| the timing of product implementations, which are highly dependent on customers resources and discretion; |
| the incurrence of costs relating to the integration of software products and operations in connection with acquisitions of technologies or businesses; and |
| the timing and market acceptance of new products or product enhancements by either us or our competitors. |
19
Because of these factors, we believe that period-to-period comparisons of our results of operations are not necessarily meaningful.
Our mix of products and services could have a significant effect on our financial condition, results of operations and the market price of our common stock
Our products and services have considerably varied gross margins. Software revenues in general yield significantly higher gross margins than do our service, maintenance, equipment and supplies revenue streams. In the past year we have experienced a decrease in software license fees. If software license fees continue to decline or if the mix of our products and services in any given period does not match our expectations, our results of operations and the market price of our common stock could be significantly affected.
As a result of our acquisitions, we could be subject to significant future write-offs with respect to intangible assets, which may adversely affect our future operating results
In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, which required that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives no longer be amortized, but instead be tested annually for impairment, or more frequently when events or circumstances occur indicating that goodwill might be impaired. Effective July 1, 2002, we adopted SFAS No. 142, which required us to perform a transitional impairment test on all indefinite lived intangible assets. In connection with our transition to SFAS 142, we recorded an impairment charge of $13.8 million in relation to the goodwill of our Bottomline Europe reporting unit. In accordance with SFAS 142, this amount has been recorded retroactively to the first quarter of fiscal year 2003, and has been reported as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. At March 31, 2003, the carrying value of our goodwill and our other intangible assets was $17.4 million and $6.4 million, respectively. We could be subject to impairment charges with respect to these intangible assets in future periods and such charges could have a material adverse effect on future operating results.
We face risks associated with our international operations that could harm our financial condition and results of operations
In recent periods, a significant percentage of our revenues has been generated by our international operations, and our future growth rates and success are in part dependent on our continued growth and success in international markets. As is the case with most international operations, the success and profitability of our international operations are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties that include, in addition to the risks our business as a whole faces, the following:
| difficulties and costs of staffing and managing foreign operations; |
| differing regulatory and industry standards and certification requirements; |
| the complexities of foreign tax jurisdictions; |
| reduced protection for intellectual property rights in some countries; |
| currency exchange rate fluctuations; and |
| import or export licensing requirements. |
A significant percentage of our revenues to date have come from our payment management offerings and our performance will depend on continued market acceptance of these solutions
A significant percentage of our revenues to date have come from the license and maintenance of our payment management offerings and sales of associated products and services. Any significant reduction in demand for our payment management offerings could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. Our future performance could depend on the following factors:
| continued market acceptance of our payment management offerings as a payment management solution; |
| prospective customers dependence upon enterprises seeking to enhance their payment functions to integrate electronic payment capabilities; |
| our ability to introduce enhancements to meet the markets evolving needs for secure payments and cash management solutions; and |
| continued acceptance of desktop and enterprise software, and laser check printing solutions. |
20
Our future financial results will depend upon the acceptance of electronic invoice presentment product offerings in an emerging market
Our electronic invoice presentment business model is in the early stages of market adoption, even though the product has been generally available from us and our competitors for some time. Customers and potential customers may not be ready to adopt our electronic invoice presentment business model, or may be slower to adopt the model than we, or the public market analysts, anticipate. If this emerging market does not adopt our business model or the market does not respond as quickly as we expect, our future results could be materially and adversely affected.
We face significant competition in our targeted markets, including competition from companies with significantly greater resources
In recent years we have encountered increasing competition in our targeted markets. We compete with a wide range of companies, ranging from small start-up enterprises with limited resources, which compete principally on the basis of technology features or specific customer relationships, to large companies, which can leverage significant customer bases and financial resources. Given the size and nature of our targeted markets, the implementation of our growth strategy and our success in competing for market share generally may be dependent on our ability to grow our sales and marketing capabilities and maintain a critical level of financial resources. We have undergone, and are currently experiencing, slowing growth rates due to current economic conditions. If this slower growth rate continues or accelerates, we could lose market share to competitors.
Integration of acquisitions or strategic investments could interrupt our business and our financial condition could be harmed
We have made several acquisitions of companies and assets in the past, including the acquisition of substantially all of the assets and certain of the liabilities of eVelocity Corporation in May 2002, and may, in the future, acquire or make investments in other businesses, products or technologies. Any acquisition or strategic investment we have made in the past or may make in the future may entail numerous risks. For example, in December 2002, Protel, Inc. sought to add Bottomline as a defendant in a claim by Protel alleging infringement of certain Protel patents by technology we acquired from eVelocity, which claim we subsequently settled. In addition to exposure to litigation from parties, including stockholders and creditors, affiliated with a company or business unit we acquire, our business is subject to risks that include the following:
| difficulties integrating acquired operations, personnel, technologies or products; |
| diversion of managements focus from our core business concerns; |
| write-offs related to impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets; |
| entrance into markets in which we have no or limited prior experience or knowledge; |
| dilution to existing stockholders and earnings per share; |
| incurrence of substantial debt; |
| exposure to litigation from third parties, including claims related to intellectual property or other assets acquired or liabilities assumed; and |
| inadequacy of existing operating, financial and management information systems to support the combined organization or new operations. |
Any such difficulties encountered as a result of any merger, acquisition or strategic investment could adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.
Our success depends on the widespread adoption of the Internet as a medium for electronic business
Our future success will in large part depend upon the willingness of businesses and financial institutions to adopt the Internet as a medium of e-business. These entities will probably accept this medium only if the Internet provides substantially greater efficiency and enhances their competitiveness. In addition, critical issues involved in the commercial use of the Internet are not yet fully resolved, including concerns regarding the Internets security, reliability, ease of access and quality of service.
To the extent that any of these or other issues inhibit or limit the adoption of the Internet as a medium of e-commerce, our business prospects could be adversely affected. If electronic business does not continue to grow or grows more slowly than expected, demand for our products and services may be reduced.
21
We depend on key employees who are skilled in e-commerce, payment, cash management and invoice presentment methodology and Internet and other technologies
Our success depends upon the efforts and abilities of our executive officers and key technical employees who are skilled in e-commerce, payment methodology and regulation, and Internet, database and network technologies. The loss of one or more of these individuals could have a material adverse effect on our business. We currently do not maintain key man life insurance policies on any of our employees. While some of our executive officers have employment agreements with us, the loss of the services of any of our executive officers or other key employees could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
We must attract and retain highly skilled personnel with knowledge in e-commerce, payment, cash management and invoice presentment methodology and Internet and other technologies
We believe that our success is in part dependent upon our ability to attract, hire, train and retain highly skilled technical, sales and marketing, and support personnel, particularly with expertise in e-commerce, payment, cash management and invoice methodology and Internet and other technologies. Competition for qualified personnel is intense. As a result, we may experience increased compensation costs that may not be offset through either improved productivity or higher sales prices. There can be no assurances that we will be successful in attracting, recruiting or in retaining existing personnel. Based on our experience, it takes an average of nine months for a salesperson to become fully productive. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in increasing the productivity of our sales personnel, and the failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
An increasing number of large and more complex customer contracts may impact the timing of our revenue recognition and affect our operating results, financial condition and the market price of our stock
Due to an increasing number of large and more complex customer contracts in the US, we have experienced, and will likely continue to experience, delays in the timing of our revenue recognition. These large and complex customer contracts generally require significant implementation work, product customization and modification resulting in the recognition of revenue on a percentage of completion basis. Delays in revenue recognition on these contracts could affect our operating results, financial condition and the market price of our common stock.
Increased competition may result in price reductions and decreased demand for our product solutions
The payments and electronic invoice presentment software markets in which we compete are intensely competitive and characterized by rapid technological change. Some competitors in our targeted markets have longer operating histories, significantly greater financial, technical, and marketing resources, greater brand recognition and a larger installed customer base than we do. We expect to face additional competition as other established and emerging companies enter the markets for payment and electronic invoice presentment software solutions. In addition, current and potential competitors may make strategic acquisitions or establish cooperative relationships to expand their product offerings and to offer more comprehensive solutions. This growing competition may result in price reductions of our products and services, reduced revenues and gross margins and loss of market share, any one of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
Our success depends on our ability to develop new and enhanced software, services and related products
The payments and electronic invoice presentment software markets in which we compete are subject to rapid technological change and our success is dependent on our ability to develop new and enhanced software, services and related products that meet evolving market needs. Trends that could have a critical impact on us include:
| rapidly changing technology, which could cause our software to become suddenly outdated or could require us to make our products compatible with new database or network systems; |
| evolving industry standards, mandates and laws, such as those mandated by the National Automated Clearing House Association and the Association for Payment Clearing Services; and |
| developments and changes relating to the Internet that we must address as we maintain existing products and introduce any new products. |
There can be no assurance that technological advances will not cause our technology to become obsolete or uneconomical. If we are unable to develop and introduce new products, or enhancements to existing products, in a timely and successful manner, our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
22
Any unanticipated performance problems or bugs in our product offerings could have a material adverse effect on our future financial results
If the products that we offer do not continue to achieve market acceptance, our future financial results will be adversely affected. Since certain of our software solutions are still in early stages of adoption, any unanticipated performance problems or bugs that we have not been able to detect could result in additional development costs, diversion of technical and other resources from our other development efforts, negative publicity regarding us and our products, harm to our customer relationships and exposure to potential liability claims. In addition, if these products do not enjoy wide commercial success, our long-term business strategy will be adversely affected, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
We could incur substantial costs resulting from warranty claims or product liability claims
Our software license agreements typically contain provisions that afford customers a degree of warranty protection in the event that our software fails to conform to its written specifications. These agreements typically contain provisions intended to limit the nature and extent of our risk of warranty and product liability claims, however there is a risk that a court might interpret these terms in a limited way or could hold part or all of these terms to be unenforceable. Furthermore, some of our licenses with our customers are governed by non-U.S. law, and there is a risk that foreign law might provide us less or different protection. While we maintain general liability insurance, including coverage for errors and omissions, we cannot be sure that our existing coverage will continue to be available on reasonable terms or will be available in amounts sufficient to cover one or more large claims. Although we have not experienced any material warranty or product liability claims to date, a warranty or product liability claim, whether or not meritorious, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of managements attention and our resources, which could have an adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
We could be adversely affected if we are unable to protect our proprietary technology and could be subject to litigation regarding our intellectual property rights, causing serious harm to our business
We rely upon a combination of patent, copyright and trademark laws and non-disclosure and other intellectual property contractual arrangements to protect our proprietary rights. However, we cannot assure you that our patents, pending applications for patents that may be issued in the future, or other intellectual property will be of sufficient scope and strength to provide meaningful protection of our technology or any commercial advantage to us, or that the patents will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented. We enter into agreements with our employees and customers that seek to limit and protect the distribution of proprietary information. Despite our efforts to safeguard and maintain our proprietary rights, there can be no assurance that such rights will remain protected or that we will be able to detect unauthorized use and take appropriate steps to enforce our intellectual property rights.
In recent years, there has been significant litigation in the United States involving patents and other intellectual property rights. We may be a party to litigation in the future to protect our intellectual property rights or as a result of an alleged infringement of the intellectual property rights of others. These claims, whether or not meritorious, could require us to spend significant sums in litigation, pay damages, delay product installments, develop non-infringing intellectual property or acquire licenses to intellectual property that is the subject of the infringement claim. These claims could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
We may incur significant costs from class action litigation as a result of expected volatility in our common stock
In the past, companies that have experienced market price volatility of their stock have been the targets of securities class action litigation. In August 2001, we were named as a party in one of the so-called laddering securities class action suits relating to the underwriting of our initial public offering. We could incur substantial costs and experience a diversion of our managements attention and resources in connection with such litigation, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our future financial results will depend on our ability to manage growth effectively
In the past, rapid growth has strained our managerial and other resources. Recently, we have undergone, and are currently experiencing, slowing growth rates due to economic conditions. If our historical growth rate resumes, our ability to manage such growth will depend in part on our ability to continue to enhance our operating, financial and management information systems. We cannot assure you that our personnel, systems and controls will be adequate to support future growth, if any. If we are unable to manage growth effectively, should it occur, the quality of our services, our ability to retain key personnel and our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
23
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
There have been no material changes in the Companys exposure to market risk from that which was disclosed in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on September 30, 2002.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) | Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Based on their evaluation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-14(c) and 15-d-14(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Companys chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and are operating in an effective manner. |
(b) | Changes in internal controls. There were no significant changes in the Companys internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their most recent evaluation. |
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
On or about December 12, 2002, an amended complaint was filed with the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in the action Protel, Inc. vs. eVelocity Corporation, et. al., seeking to add Bottomline as a defendant in a claim by Protel, Inc. for an injunction, damages, attorneys fees, court costs and expenses in connection with alleged infringement of certain Protel patents by software we acquired from eVelocity. We entered into a mutual release agreement with Protel, Inc. on February 21, 2003, whereby both parties agreed to settle all claims and counterclaims in the litigation. The terms of the settlement did not have a material impact on our business, operating results or financial condition.
Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds
Sales of Unregistered Securities
In March 2003, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement with funds affiliated with General Atlantic LLC (General Atlantic), a private equity investment firm. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company issued and sold 270,000 shares of common stock to General Atlantic at a price of $5.54 per share and received aggregate proceeds of approximately $1.5 million. The securities were offered and issued pursuant to Section 506 of Regulation D of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1933, as amended.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits:
See the Exhibit Index on page 28 for a list of exhibits filed as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which Exhibit Index is incorporated herein by reference.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K:
None.
24
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
BOTTOMLINE TECHNOLOGIES (de), INC. | ||||||
Date: May 14, 2003 |
By: |
/s/ ROBERT A. EBERLE | ||||
Robert A. Eberle Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Secretary (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
25
I, Joseph L. Mullen, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bottomline Technologies (de), Inc.; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; |
4. | The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: |
a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; |
b) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and |
c) | Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; |
5. | The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
a) | All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and |
6. | The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. |
Date: May 14, 2003 |
By: |
/s/ JOSEPH L. MULLEN | ||||
Joseph L. Mullen President and Chief Executive Officer |
26
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Robert A. Eberle, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bottomline Technologies (de), Inc.; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; |
4. | The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: |
a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; |
b) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and |
c) | Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; |
5. | The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
a) | All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and |
6. | The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. |
Date: May 14, 2003 |
By: |
/s/ ROBERT A. EBERLE | ||||
Robert A. Eberle Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Secretary (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
27
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit Number |
Description | |
10.1 |
Stock Purchase Agreement dated March 20, 2003, by and among Bottomline Technologies (de), Inc., General Atlantic Partners 74, L.P.,GAP Coinvestment Partners II, L.P., GapStar, LLC and GAPCO GmbH & Co. KG. | |
99.1 |
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
99.2 |
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
28