Back to GetFilings.com
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended October 26, 2002
OR
¨ TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from
to
Commission File Number 000-27273
SYCAMORE NETWORKS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
|
04-3410558 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification
No.) |
220 Mill Road
Chelmsford, MA 01824
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip code)
(978) 250-2900
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
150 Apollo Drive
Chelmsford, MA 01824
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act).
Yes ¨ No ¨.
The number of shares outstanding of the Registrants Common Stock as of December 2, 2002 was 271,814,321.
Sycamore Networks, Inc.
Part I. Financial Information
|
|
|
|
Page No.
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
Item 2. |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Item 3. |
|
|
|
32 |
|
Item 4. |
|
|
|
32 |
|
Part II. |
|
|
|
33 |
|
Item 1. |
|
|
|
33 |
|
Item 6. |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
38 |
2
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Sycamore Networks, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets (in thousands, except par value)
|
|
October 26, 2002
|
|
|
July 31, 2002
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
269,043 |
|
|
$ |
172,658 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
382,634 |
|
|
|
509,350 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $4,684 at October 26, 2002 and July 31, 2002 |
|
|
13,385 |
|
|
|
18,187 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
12,042 |
|
|
|
12,940 |
|
Prepaids and other current assets |
|
|
2,425 |
|
|
|
3,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
679,529 |
|
|
|
716,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
27,707 |
|
|
|
32,696 |
|
Long-term investments |
|
|
367,151 |
|
|
|
361,537 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
5,370 |
|
|
|
7,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,079,757 |
|
|
$ |
1,118,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
4,418 |
|
|
$ |
6,104 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
3,460 |
|
|
|
3,896 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
9,579 |
|
|
|
13,148 |
|
Accrued restructuring costs |
|
|
33,505 |
|
|
|
48,167 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
2,740 |
|
|
|
4,978 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
2,797 |
|
|
|
3,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
56,499 |
|
|
|
80,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 5,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.001 par value; 2,500,000 shares authorized; 273,681 shares issued at October 26, 2002 and July 31, 2002 |
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,732,652 |
|
|
|
1,732,846 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(698,448 |
) |
|
|
(681,086 |
) |
Deferred compensation |
|
|
(15,000 |
) |
|
|
(17,910 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost, 2,612 and 1,933 shares held at October 26, 2002 and July 31, 2002, respectively
|
|
|
(215 |
) |
|
|
(158 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
3,995 |
|
|
|
4,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,023,258 |
|
|
|
1,038,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,079,757 |
|
|
$ |
1,118,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
3
Sycamore Networks, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations (in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
October 26, 2002
|
|
|
October 27, 2001
|
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product |
|
$ |
2,848 |
|
|
$ |
15,774 |
|
Service |
|
|
3,090 |
|
|
|
5,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
5,938 |
|
|
|
21,243 |
|
Cost of revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product |
|
|
4,301 |
|
|
|
114,273 |
|
Service |
|
|
2,842 |
|
|
|
8,342 |
|
Stock compensation |
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue |
|
|
7,499 |
|
|
|
123,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross loss |
|
|
(1,561 |
) |
|
|
(101,889 |
) |
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development (exclusive of non-cash stock compensation expense of $874 and $2,725) |
|
|
13,927 |
|
|
|
36,515 |
|
Sales and marketing (exclusive of non-cash stock compensation expense of $612 and $2,467) |
|
|
4,942 |
|
|
|
13,704 |
|
General and administrative (exclusive of non-cash stock compensation expense of $531 and $575) |
|
|
1,658 |
|
|
|
3,190 |
|
Stock compensation |
|
|
2,017 |
|
|
|
5,767 |
|
Restructuring charges and related asset impairments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
22,544 |
|
|
|
136,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(24,105 |
) |
|
|
(238,371 |
) |
Losses on investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,737 |
) |
Interest and other income, net |
|
|
6,743 |
|
|
|
13,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(17,362 |
) |
|
|
(247,935 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(17,362 |
) |
|
$ |
(247,935 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.00 |
) |
Weighted average shares used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share |
|
|
262,300 |
|
|
|
249,014 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
4
Sycamore Networks, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (in thousands)
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
October 26, 2002
|
|
|
October 27, 2001
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(17,362 |
) |
|
$ |
(247,935 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
5,579 |
|
|
|
12,349 |
|
Stock compensation |
|
|
2,373 |
|
|
|
6,284 |
|
Restructuring charges and related asset impairments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,513 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
4,802 |
|
|
|
13,714 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
(19,643 |
) |
Prepaids and other current assets |
|
|
1,022 |
|
|
|
487 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
(2,238 |
) |
|
|
(222 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(1,686 |
) |
|
|
(34,028 |
) |
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
(4,967 |
) |
|
|
(1,305 |
) |
Accrued restructuring costs |
|
|
(14,662 |
) |
|
|
39,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(26,241 |
) |
|
|
(94,694 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(590 |
) |
|
|
(5,924 |
) |
Purchases of investments |
|
|
(165,700 |
) |
|
|
(372,833 |
) |
Maturities of investments |
|
|
286,240 |
|
|
|
274,128 |
|
Decrease (increase) in other assets |
|
|
2,390 |
|
|
|
(1,580 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
122,340 |
|
|
|
(106,209 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
96,385 |
|
|
|
(200,591 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
172,658 |
|
|
|
492,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
269,043 |
|
|
$ |
291,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
5
Sycamore Networks, Inc.
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
1. |
|
Description of Business |
Sycamore Networks, Inc. (the Company) was incorporated in Delaware on February 17, 1998. The Company develops and markets intelligent optical networking products that enable telecommunications service providers to quickly
and cost-effectively transform the capacity created by their fiber optic networks into usable bandwidth to deploy new services.
The accompanying financial data as of October 26, 2002 and for the three months ended October 26, 2002 and October 27, 2001 has been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules
and regulations. However, the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and
the notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2002.
In the opinion of
management, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present a fair statement of financial position as of October 26, 2002, and results of operations and cash flows for the three months ended October 26, 2002
and October 27, 2001 have been made. The results of operations and cash flows for the three months ended October 26, 2002 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results and cash flows for the full fiscal year or any future periods.
Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss for the period by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period less unvested restricted stock. Diluted net income (loss) per share is
computed by dividing the net income (loss) for the period by the weighted-average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during the period, if dilutive. Common equivalent shares are composed of unvested shares of restricted common
stock and the incremental common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and warrants outstanding.
The following
table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
October 26, 2002
|
|
|
October 27, 2001
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(17,362 |
) |
|
$ |
(247,935 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding |
|
|
271,246 |
|
|
|
272,728 |
|
Weighted-average shares subject to repurchase |
|
|
(8,946 |
) |
|
|
(23,714 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in per-share calculation basic and diluted |
|
|
262,300 |
|
|
|
249,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.00 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
Options to purchase 32.5 million and 18.1 million shares of common stock, at respective average exercise
prices of $8.20 and $15.55, have not been included in the computation of diluted net loss per share for the three months ended October 26, 2002 and October 27, 2001, respectively, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive. Warrants to purchase
150,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $11.69 have not been included in the computation of diluted net loss per share for the three months ended October 26, 2002 and October 27, 2001, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
October 26, 2002
|
|
July 31, 2002
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
1,989 |
|
$ |
3,609 |
Work in process |
|
|
2,309 |
|
|
964 |
Finished goods |
|
|
7,744 |
|
|
8,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,042 |
|
$ |
12,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of comprehensive loss consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
October 26, 2002
|
|
|
October 27, 2001
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(17,362 |
) |
|
$ |
(247,935 |
) |
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments |
|
|
(562 |
) |
|
|
2,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(17,924 |
) |
|
$ |
(245,870 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. |
|
Restructuring Charges and Related Asset Impairments |
Beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2001, unfavorable economic conditions and reduced capital spending by telecommunications service providers negatively impacted the Companys operating
results in a progressive and increasingly severe manner. As a result, the Company undertook three separate business restructuring programs to reduce expenses and align its resources with long-term growth opportunities: the first in the third quarter
of fiscal 2001 (the fiscal 2001 restructuring), the second in the first quarter of fiscal 2002 (the first quarter fiscal 2002 restructuring), and the third in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002 (the fourth quarter fiscal
2002 restructuring). As a result of the combined activity under all of the restructuring actions, during fiscal 2002, the Company recorded a total net charge of $241.5 million, which was classified in the statement of operations as follows:
cost of revenue - $91.7 million, operating expenses - $125.0 million, and non-operating expenses - $24.8 million. As of October 26, 2002, the Company had $33.5 million in accrued restructuring costs. Details regarding each of the restructuring
programs are described below.
7
Fiscal 2001 Restructuring:
The fiscal 2001 restructuring program included a workforce reduction of 131 employees, consolidation of excess facilities, and the restructuring of certain business functions to eliminate non-strategic
products and overlapping feature sets. As a result, the Company recorded restructuring charges and related asset impairments of $81.9 million classified as operating expenses and an excess inventory charge of $84.0 million relating to discontinued
product lines, which was classified as cost of revenue. The fiscal 2001 restructuring program was substantially completed during the first half of fiscal 2002. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002, the Company recorded a net $2.1 million credit to
operating expenses due to various changes in estimates. As of October 26, 2002, the projected future cash payments of $15.1 million consist of facility consolidation charges that will be paid over the respective lease terms through fiscal 2007 and
potential legal matters and administrative expenses associated with the restructuring activities.
The restructuring charges and related
asset impairments recorded in the fiscal 2001 restructuring program, and the reserve activity since that time, are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Original Restructuring Charge
|
|
Non-cash Charges
|
|
Cash Payments
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
Accrual Balance at July 31, 2002
|
|
Cash Payments
|
|
Accrual Balance at October 26, 2002
|
Workforce reduction |
|
$ |
4,174 |
|
$ |
829 |
|
$ |
3,203 |
|
$ |
142 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Facility consolidations and certain other costs |
|
|
24,437 |
|
|
1,214 |
|
|
5,419 |
|
|
1,994 |
|
|
15,810 |
|
|
720 |
|
|
15,090 |
Inventory and asset write-downs |
|
|
137,285 |
|
|
84,972 |
|
|
52,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
165,896 |
|
$ |
87,015 |
|
$ |
60,935 |
|
$ |
2,136 |
|
$ |
15,810 |
|
$ |
720 |
|
$ |
15,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter Fiscal 2002 Restructuring:
The first quarter fiscal 2002 restructuring program included a workforce reduction of 239 employees, consolidation of excess facilities and charges related to
excess inventory and other asset impairments. As a result, the Company recorded restructuring charges and related asset impairments of $77.3 million classified as operating expenses and an excess inventory charge of $102.4 million classified as cost
of revenue. In addition, the Company recorded charges totaling $22.7 million, classified as a non-operating expense, relating to impairments of investments in non-publicly traded companies that were determined to be other than temporary. The
restructuring charges included $7.1 million of costs relating to the workforce reduction, $11.2 million related to the write-down of certain land, lease terminations and non-cancelable lease costs and $6.0 million for potential legal matters,
administrative expenses and professional fees in connection with the restructuring activities. The restructuring charges also included $102.4 million for inventory write-downs and non-cancelable purchase commitments for inventories due to a severe
decline in the forecasted demand for the Companys products and $53.1 million for asset impairments related to the Companys vendor financing agreements and fixed assets that were abandoned by the Company.
The first quarter fiscal 2002 restructuring program was substantially completed during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002. During the third and fourth quarters of
fiscal 2002, the Company recorded credits totaling $10.8 million to cost of revenue due to changes in estimates, the majority of which related to favorable settlements with contract manufacturers for non-cancelable inventory purchase commitments. In
addition, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002, the Company recorded a net $1.7 million credit to operating expenses relating to various changes in estimates. As of October 26, 2002, the projected future cash payments of $6.5 million consist
primarily of facility consolidation charges that will be paid over the respective lease terms through fiscal 2005 and potential legal matters and administrative expenses associated with the restructuring activities.
The restructuring charges and related asset impairments recorded in the first quarter fiscal 2002 restructuring program, and the reserve activity
since that time, are summarized as follows (in thousands):
8
|
|
Original Restructuring Charge
|
|
Non-cash Charges
|
|
Cash Payments
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
Accrual Balance at July 31, 2002
|
|
Cash Payments
|
|
Accrual Balance at October 26, 2002
|
Workforce reduction |
|
$ |
7,106 |
|
$ |
173 |
|
$ |
6,106 |
|
$ |
827 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Facility consolidations and certain other costs |
|
|
17,181 |
|
|
8,572 |
|
|
1,684 |
|
|
835 |
|
|
6,090 |
|
|
360 |
|
|
5,730 |
Inventory and asset write-downs |
|
|
155,451 |
|
|
102,540 |
|
|
41,358 |
|
|
10,804 |
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
|
|
749 |
Losses on investments |
|
|
22,737 |
|
|
22,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
202,475 |
|
$ |
134,022 |
|
$ |
49,148 |
|
$ |
12,466 |
|
$ |
6,839 |
|
$ |
360 |
|
$ |
6,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter Fiscal 2002 Restructuring:
The fourth quarter fiscal 2002 restructuring program included a workforce reduction of 225 employees, consolidation of excess facilities, and the restructuring
of certain business functions to eliminate non-strategic products. This included discontinuing the development of the Companys standalone transport products, including the SN 8000 Intelligent Optical Transport Node and the SN 10000 Intelligent
Optical Transport System. As a result, the Company recorded restructuring charges and related asset impairments of $51.5 million classified as operating expenses. In addition, the Company recorded a charge of $2.1 million, classified as a
non-operating expense, relating to impairments of investments in non-publicly traded companies that were determined to be other than temporary. The restructuring charges included $8.7 million of costs relating to the workforce reduction, $5.6
million for lease terminations and non-cancelable lease costs and $14.5 million relating to potential legal matters, contractual commitments, administrative expenses and professional fees related to the restructuring activities. The restructuring
charges also included $22.6 million of costs relating to asset impairments, which primarily included fixed assets that were disposed of, or abandoned, due to the rationalization of the Companys product offerings and the consolidation of excess
facilities.
The fourth quarter fiscal 2002 restructuring program is expected to be substantially completed during the first half of
fiscal 2003. As of October 26, 2002, the projected future cash payments of $11.9 million consist primarily of facility consolidation charges that will be paid over the respective lease terms through fiscal 2006 and potential legal matters and
administrative expenses associated with the restructuring activities. The projected future cash payments relating to workforce reductions will be substantially paid during the second quarter of fiscal 2003.
The restructuring charges and related asset impairments recorded in the fourth quarter fiscal 2002 restructuring program, and the reserve activity since that
time, are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Original Restructuring Charge
|
|
Non-cash Charges
|
|
Cash Payments
|
|
Accrual Balance at July 31, 2002
|
|
Cash Payments
|
|
Accrual Balance at October 26, 2002
|
Workforce reduction |
|
$ |
8,713 |
|
$ |
814 |
|
$ |
2,059 |
|
$ |
5,840 |
|
$ |
4,426 |
|
$ |
1,414 |
Facility consolidations and certain other costs |
|
|
20,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
454 |
|
|
19,678 |
|
|
9,156 |
|
|
10,522 |
Asset write-downs |
|
|
22,637 |
|
|
22,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses on investments |
|
|
2,108 |
|
|
2,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
53,590 |
|
$ |
25,559 |
|
$ |
2,513 |
|
$ |
25,518 |
|
$ |
13,582 |
|
$ |
11,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. |
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
In October 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, which addresses the financial accounting and reporting for the disposal of long-lived assets. SFAS No. 144 is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001 and interim periods
9
within those fiscal years. The Company adopted SFAS No. 144 in the first quarter of fiscal 2003. The adoption of SFAS No. 144 did not have a material impact on the Companys financial
position or results of operations.
In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or
Disposal Activities, which addresses the accounting for disposal and exit activities, and supersedes EITF 94-3. SFAS No. 146 is required to be applied prospectively to disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. Under SFAS No. 146,
certain types of restructuring charges will be recorded as they are incurred over time, rather than being accrued at the time of managements commitment to an exit plan as specified by EITF 94-3. The adoption of SFAS No. 146 is not expected to
have a material impact on the Companys financial position or results of operations.
Beginning
on July 2, 2001, several purported class action complaints were filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against the Company and several of its officers and directors (the Individual Defendants) and
the underwriters for the Companys initial public offering on October 21, 1999. Some of the complaints also include the underwriters for the Companys follow-on offering on March 14, 2000. The complaints were consolidated into a single
action and an amended complaint was filed on April 19, 2002. The amended complaint was filed on behalf of persons who purchased the Companys common stock between October 21, 1999 and December 6, 2000. The amended complaint alleges violations
of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, primarily based on the assertion that the Companys lead underwriters, the Company and the other named defendants made material false and misleading
statements in the Companys Registration Statements and Prospectuses filed with the SEC in October 1999 and March 2000 because of the failure to disclose (a) the alleged solicitation and receipt of excessive and undisclosed commissions by the
underwriters in connection with the allocation of shares of common stock to certain investors in the Companys public offerings and (b) that certain of the underwriters allegedly had entered into agreements with investors whereby underwriters
agreed to allocate the public offering shares in exchange for which the investors agreed to make additional purchases of stock in the aftermarket at pre-determined prices. The amended complaint alleges claims against the Company, several of the
Companys officers and directors and the underwriters under Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act. It also alleges claims against the Company, the individual defendants and the underwriters under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act. The action against the Company is being coordinated with over three hundred other nearly identical actions filed against other companies. The actions seek damages in an unspecified amount. A motion to dismiss addressing issues common
to the companies and individuals who have been sued in these actions was filed on July 15, 2002. An opposition to that motion was filed on behalf of the plaintiffs and a reply brief was filed on behalf of the defendants. The fully briefed issues are
now pending before the court and oral arguments were heard on November 1, 2002. On October 9, 2002, the court dismissed the Individual Defendants from the case without prejudice based upon Stipulations of Dismissal filed by the plaintiffs and the
Individual Defendants. The Company believes that the claims against it are without merit and intends to defend against the complaints vigorously. The Company is not currently able to estimate the possibility of loss or range of loss, if any,
relating to these claims.
The Company is subject to legal proceedings, claims, and litigation arising in the ordinary course of
business. While the outcome of these matters is currently not determinable, management does not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations or financial
position.
10
Item 2.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Except for the
historical information contained herein, we wish to caution you that certain matters discussed in this report constitute forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those stated or
implied in forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including, without limitation, those risks and uncertainties discussed under the heading Factors That May Affect Future Operating Results contained in this Form 10-Q. The
information discussed in this report should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K and other reports we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Forward-looking statements include statements regarding
our expectations, beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding the future and can be identified by forward-looking words such as anticipate, believe, could, estimate, expect,
intend, may, should, will, and would or similar words.
Overview
We develop and market intelligent optical networking products that enable telecommunications service providers to quickly and
cost-effectively transform the capacity created by their fiber optic networks into usable bandwidth to deploy new services. Our annual revenue increased from our inception in February 1998 to $374.7 million for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2001.
However, our revenue decreased to $65.2 million for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2002, representing a decrease of 83% compared to fiscal year 2001. For the first quarter of fiscal 2003, our revenue was $5.9 million, a decrease of 72% compared to
the first quarter of fiscal 2002.
Our rapid growth in revenue through the first half of fiscal year 2001 reflected a strong economic
environment for telecommunications service providers, driven by strong capital markets and by changes in the regulatory environment, in particular those brought about by the Telecommunications Act of 1996. These factors enabled a significant number
of new companies to enter the telecommunications services industry, typically referred to as emerging service providers. The entry of emerging service providers into the market also increased the competitive pressure on incumbent service providers
that traditionally had offered telecommunications services, causing them to increase their capital expenditures above their historical levels during this period.
Beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2001, our revenue declined significantly due to unfavorable economic conditions caused by a rapid and significant decrease in capital spending by telecommunications service providers.
Emerging service providers, which had been the early adopters of our technology, were no longer able to continue to fund aggressive deployments of equipment within their networks due to their inability to access the capital markets. Since then, many
emerging service providers have experienced severe financial difficulties, and in many cases, have filed for bankruptcy protection, or have liquidated their assets and are no longer in business. This trend was compounded by decisions by incumbent
service providers to slow their capital expenditures significantly, in part due to reduced competitive pressure from emerging service providers. In addition, many incumbent service providers have found their prospects for raising additional capital
through the issuance of debt or equity securities to be greatly reduced, causing them to decrease capital expenditures to the minimum amount required to support their existing customer commitments. These conditions are currently impacting many of
our current and prospective customers, and make any recovery in capital spending extremely difficult to forecast. As a result of these factors, our revenue decreased 83% in fiscal year 2002 compared to fiscal year 2001. For the first quarter of
fiscal 2003, our revenue was $5.9 million, a decrease of 72% compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2002. Our revenue has been, and continues to be, negatively impacted by these unfavorable economic conditions.
Currently we anticipate that the cost of revenue and the resulting gross margin will continue to be adversely affected by several factors, including reduced
demand for our products, the effects of product volumes and manufacturing efficiencies, component limitations, the mix of products and services sold, increases in material and labor costs, loss of cost savings due to changes in component pricing or
charges incurred if we do not correctly anticipate product demand, competitive pricing, and possible exposure to excess and obsolete inventory charges. While we have taken actions to reduce our cost structure, we anticipate that we will continue to
incur operating losses unless the overall economic environment improves and our revenue increases significantly compared to current levels. We have incurred substantial cumulative net losses to date totaling $698.4 million, which includes net
restructuring and
11
related asset impairment charges totaling $407.4 million. At this time, we cannot predict when, or if, the economic environment and the demand
for our products will improve.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Managements discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements. The preparation of these financial
statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and related disclosure of contingent liabilities. We evaluate these estimates on an ongoing basis, including those
relating to bad debts, inventories, valuation of investments, warranty obligations, restructuring liabilities and asset impairments, litigation and other contingencies. Estimates are based on our historical experience and other assumptions that we
consider reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these
estimates. To the extent there are material differences between our estimates and the actual results, our future results of operations will be affected.
We believe that the following critical accounting policies represent the most significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements, because changes in such estimates can materially
affect the amount of our reported net income or loss. When products are shipped to customers, we evaluate whether all of the fundamental criteria for revenue recognition have been met. The most significant judgments for revenue recognition typically
involve whether there are any significant uncertainties regarding customer acceptance and whether collectibility can be considered reasonably assured. In addition, some of our transactions may involve the sales of systems and services under multiple
element arrangements. While each individual transaction varies according to the terms of the purchase order or sales agreement, a typical multiple element arrangement may include some or all of the following components: product shipments,
installation services, maintenance and training. The total sales price is allocated based on the relative fair value of each component, generally the price charged for each component when sold separately. For the product portion, revenue is
recognized upon shipment if there are no significant uncertainties regarding customer acceptance. If uncertainties regarding customer acceptance exist, revenue is recognized when such uncertainties are resolved. For installation services, revenue is
typically recognized upon receipt of documentation from the customer that the services have been performed. For maintenance and training services, revenue is recognized when the services are performed. After customers have been invoiced, management
evaluates the outstanding accounts receivable balances until they are collected, to determine whether an allowance for doubtful accounts should be recorded. In the event of a sudden deterioration in a particular customers financial condition,
additional provisions for doubtful accounts may be required. We accrue for the estimated cost of product warranties at the time revenue is recognized, based primarily on our historical experience. If actual warranty claims exceed the amounts
accrued, additional warranty charges would be required which would reduce gross margins in future periods.
We continuously monitor our
inventory balances and provisions are recorded for any differences between the cost of the inventory and its estimated market value, based on assumptions about future demand and market conditions. We believe that the accounting estimates relating to
the net realizable value of our inventories is a critical accounting estimate because it is based primarily on our estimate of future inventory demand and usage, which requires us to make significant assumptions about future sales and market
conditions. While such assumptions may change significantly from period to period, the net realizable value of inventories is measured using the best information available as of the balance sheet date. To the extent that a severe decline in
forecasted demand occurs, significant charges for excess inventory are likely to occur, such as the $102.4 million charge we recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2002. Once inventory has been written down to its estimated net realizable value,
its carrying value cannot be increased due to subsequent changes in demand forecasts. Accordingly, if inventory previously written down to its net realizable value is subsequently sold, we may realize improved gross profit margins on these
transactions. During the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2002, we recorded credits totaling $10.8 million to cost of revenue relating to inventory charges that were originally recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2002. These credits related
to favorable settlements of inventory purchase commitments with contract manufacturers, and to a lesser extent, sales of inventory that had been previously written down.
12
During the third quarter of fiscal 2001 and the first and fourth quarters of fiscal 2002, we recorded
charges for restructuring and related asset impairments totaling $422.0 million, including inventory related charges of $186.4 million. These restructuring activities required us to make numerous assumptions and estimates, including future revenue
levels and product mix, the timing of and the amounts received for subleases of excess facilities, the fair values of impaired assets, the amounts of other than temporary impairments of strategic investments, and the potential legal matters,
administrative expenses and professional fees associated with the restructuring activities. The estimates and assumptions relating to the restructuring activities are continually monitored and evaluated, and if these estimates and assumptions
change, we may be required to record additional charges or credits against the reserves previously recorded for these restructuring activities. For example, during the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2002, we recorded credits totaling $3.8
million to operating expenses, due to various changes in estimates relating to the restructuring charges that had been recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 2001 and the first quarter of fiscal 2002. These credits included decreases in the
potential legal matters associated with the restructuring activities, partially offset by increases in the projected liabilities relating to facility consolidations. As of October 26, 2002, we had $17.9 million accrued as part of our restructuring
liability relating to facility consolidations, based on our best estimate of the available sublease rates and terms at the present time. In the event that we are unsuccessful in subleasing any of the restructured facilities, we could incur
additional restructuring charges and cash outflows in future periods totaling $6.2 million, which represents the amount of the assumed sublease recoveries that have been incorporated into the current estimate.
Results of Operations
Revenue
Revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 decreased 72% to $5.9 million, compared to revenue of $21.2 million for the first
quarter of fiscal 2002. Product revenue declined 82% to $2.8 million, and service revenue declined 44% to $3.1 million, compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2002. The decrease in product revenue was due to the weak overall economic environment
and continuing adverse conditions in the telecommunications industry, in particular the significant reductions in capital spending by our target customers. The decrease in service revenue was primarily due to the lower level of installation services
associated with our product deployments. For the first quarter of fiscal 2003, two international customers accounted for the majority of our revenue. For our current fiscal year ending July 31, 2003, we anticipate that revenue will continue to be
highly concentrated in a relatively small number of customers and that international revenue will represent a relatively high percentage of total revenue.
Cost of Revenue
Total cost of revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 decreased 94% to $7.5 million
from $123.1 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2002. Cost of revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 included stock compensation expense of $0.4 million, compared to $0.5 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2002. Cost of revenue for
the first quarter of fiscal 2002 included an excess inventory charge of $102.4 million for inventory write-downs and non-cancelable purchase order commitments. Total cost of revenue was 126% of revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2003, compared
to 580% of revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2002. Excluding excess inventory charges and stock compensation expense, cost of revenue was 120% of total revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2003, compared to 95% of total revenue for the
first quarter of fiscal 2002. Cost of revenue as a percentage of total revenue in both periods reflects the overall decline in revenue and resulting lower utilization of certain fixed manufacturing and customer support costs.
Cost of revenue for services for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 decreased $5.5 million, or 66%, to $2.8 million, compared to the first quarter of
fiscal 2002, due to the overall decrease in revenue and the reduction in customer support costs as a result of our restructuring programs.
Research and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses for the first quarter of fiscal 2003
decreased 62% to $13.9 million from $36.5 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2002. The decrease was primarily due to reduced costs for project materials and a decrease in personnel related expenses due to our restructuring activities, which
resulted in a consolidation of product offerings and more focused development efforts.
13
Sales and Marketing Expenses
Sales and marketing expenses for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 decreased 64% to $4.9 million from $13.7 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2002. The decrease in expenses was primarily due to
lower personnel and related expenses due to our restructuring programs.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 decreased 48% to $1.7 million from $3.2 million for the first quarter of
fiscal 2002. The decrease in expenses was primarily due to lower personnel and related expenses due to our restructuring programs.
Stock Compensation Expense
Total stock compensation expense for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 decreased 62% to
$2.4 million from $6.3 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2002. For the first quarter of fiscal 2003, $0.4 million of stock compensation expense was classified as cost of revenue and $2.0 million was classified as operating expenses. Stock
compensation expense primarily resulted from the granting of stock options and restricted shares with exercise or sale prices which were deemed to be below fair market value. The decrease was primarily due to stock compensation expense for
restricted stock and stock options relating to the acquisition of Sirocco Systems, Inc. which were fully amortized in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002. Stock compensation expense also declined as result of personnel reductions from our
restructuring activities. Stock compensation expense is expected to impact our reported results of operations through the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005.
Restructuring Charges and Related Asset Impairments
Beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2001,
unfavorable economic conditions and reduced capital spending by telecommunications service providers negatively impacted our operating results in a progressive and increasingly severe manner. As a result, we undertook three separate business
restructuring programs to reduce expenses and align our resources with long-term growth opportunities: the first in the third quarter of fiscal 2001 (the fiscal 2001 restructuring), the second in the first quarter of fiscal 2002 (the
first quarter fiscal 2002 restructuring), and the third in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002 (the fourth quarter fiscal 2002 restructuring). As a result of the combined activity under all of the restructuring actions, during
fiscal 2002, we recorded a total net charge of $241.5 million, which was classified in the statement of operations as follows: cost of revenue $91.7 million, operating expenses $125.0 million, and non-operating expenses $24.8
million. As of October 26, 2002, we had $33.5 million in accrued restructuring costs. Details regarding each of the restructuring programs are described below.
Fiscal 2001 Restructuring:
The
fiscal 2001 restructuring program included a workforce reduction of 131 employees, consolidation of excess facilities, and the restructuring of certain business functions to eliminate non-strategic products and overlapping feature sets. As a result,
we recorded restructuring charges and related asset impairments of $81.9 million classified as operating expenses and an excess inventory charge of $84.0 million relating to discontinued product lines, which was classified as cost of revenue. The
fiscal 2001 restructuring program was substantially completed during the first half of fiscal 2002. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002, we recorded a net $2.1 million credit to operating expenses due to various changes in estimates. As of October
26, 2002, the projected future cash payments of $15.1 million consist of facility consolidation charges that will be paid over the respective lease terms through fiscal 2007 and potential legal matters and administrative expenses associated with the
restructuring activities.
The restructuring charges and related asset impairments recorded in the fiscal 2001 restructuring program, and
the reserve activity since that time, are summarized as follows (in thousands):
14
|
|
Original Restructuring Charge
|
|
Non-cash Charges
|
|
Cash Payments
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
Accrual Balance at
July 31, 2002
|
|
Cash Payments
|
|
Accrual Balance at
October 26, 2002
|
Workforce reduction |
|
$ |
4,174 |
|
$ |
829 |
|
$ |
3,203 |
|
$ |
142 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Facility consolidations and certain other costs |
|
|
24,437 |
|
|
1,214 |
|
|
5,419 |
|
|
1,994 |
|
|
15,810 |
|
|
720 |
|
|
15,090 |
Inventory and asset write-downs |
|
|
137,285 |
|
|
84,972 |
|
|
52,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
165,896 |
|
$ |
87,015 |
|
$ |
60,935 |
|
$ |
2,136 |
|
$ |
15,810 |
|
$ |
720 |
|
$ |
15,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter Fiscal 2002 Restructuring:
The first quarter fiscal 2002 restructuring program included a workforce reduction of 239 employees, consolidation of excess facilities
and charges related to excess inventory and other asset impairments. As a result, we recorded restructuring charges and related asset impairments of $77.3 million classified as operating expenses and an excess inventory charge of $102.4 million
classified as cost of revenue. In addition, we recorded charges totaling $22.7 million, classified as a non-operating expense, relating to impairments of investments in non-publicly traded companies that were determined to be other than temporary.
The restructuring charges included $7.1 million of costs relating to the workforce reduction, $11.2 million related to the write-down of certain land, lease terminations and non-cancelable lease costs and $6.0 million for potential legal matters,
administrative expenses and professional fees in connection with the restructuring activities. The restructuring charges also included $102.4 million for inventory write-downs and non-cancelable purchase commitments for inventories due to a severe
decline in the forecasted demand for our products and $53.1 million for asset impairments related to our vendor financing agreements and fixed assets that were abandoned by us.
The first quarter fiscal 2002 restructuring program was substantially completed during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002. During the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2002, we recorded credits
totaling $10.8 million to cost of revenue due to changes in estimates, the majority of which related to favorable settlements with contract manufacturers for non-cancelable inventory purchase commitments. In addition, during the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2002, we recorded a net $1.7 million credit to operating expenses relating to various changes in estimates. As of October 26, 2002, the projected future cash payments of $6.5 million consist primarily of facility consolidation charges that
will be paid over the respective lease terms through fiscal 2005 and potential legal matters and administrative expenses associated with the restructuring activities.
The restructuring charges and related asset impairments recorded in the first quarter fiscal 2002 restructuring program, and the reserve activity since that time, are summarized as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
Original Restructuring
Charge
|
|
Non-cash Charges
|
|
Cash Payments
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
Accrual Balance at July
31, 2002
|
|
Cash Payments
|
|
Accrual Balance at October 26, 2002
|
Workforce reduction |
|
$ |
7,106 |
|
$ |
173 |
|
$ |
6,106 |
|
$ |
827 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Facility consolidations and certain other costs |
|
|
17,181 |
|
|
8,572 |
|
|
1,684 |
|
|
835 |
|
|
6,090 |
|
|
360 |
|
|
5,730 |
Inventory and asset write-downs |
|
|
155,451 |
|
|
102,540 |
|
|
41,358 |
|
|
10,804 |
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
|
|
749 |
Losses on investments |
|
|
22,737 |
|
|
22,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
202,475 |
|
$ |
134,022 |
|
$ |
49,148 |
|
$ |
12,466 |
|
$ |
6,839 |
|
$ |
360 |
|
$ |
6,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter Fiscal 2002 Restructuring:
The fourth quarter fiscal 2002 restructuring program included a workforce reduction of 225 employees, consolidation of excess
facilities, and the restructuring of certain business functions to eliminate non-strategic products. This included discontinuing the development of our standalone transport products, including the SN 8000 Intelligent Optical Transport Node and the
SN 10000 Intelligent Optical Transport System. As a result, we recorded
15
restructuring charges and related asset impairments of $51.5 million classified as operating expenses.
In addition, we recorded a charge of $2.1 million, classified as a non-operating expense, relating to impairments of investments in non-publicly traded companies that were determined to be other than temporary. The restructuring charges included
$8.7 million of costs relating to the workforce reduction, $5.6 million for lease terminations and non-cancelable lease costs and $14.5 million relating to potential legal matters, contractual commitments, administrative expenses and professional
fees related to the restructuring activities. The restructuring charges also included $22.6 million of costs relating to asset impairments, which primarily included fixed assets that were disposed of, or abandoned, due to the rationalization of our
product offerings and the consolidation of excess facilities.
The fourth quarter fiscal 2002 restructuring program is expected to be
substantially completed during the first half of fiscal 2003. As of October 26, 2002, the projected future cash payments of $11.9 million consist primarily of facility consolidation charges that will be paid over the respective lease terms through
fiscal 2006 and potential legal matters and administrative expenses associated with the restructuring activities. The projected future cash payments relating to workforce reductions will be substantially paid during the second quarter of fiscal
2003.
The restructuring charges and related asset impairments recorded in the fourth quarter fiscal 2002 restructuring program, and the
reserve activity since that time, are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Original Restructuring
Charge
|
|
Non-cash Charges
|
|
Cash Payments
|
|
Accrual Balance at July 31, 2002
|
|
Cash Payments
|
|
Accrual Balance at October 26, 2002
|
Workforce reduction |
|
$ |
8,713 |
|
$ |
814 |
|
$ |
2,059 |
|
$ |
5,840 |
|
$ |
4,426 |
|
$ |
1,414 |
Facility consolidations and certain other costs |
|
|
20,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
454 |
|
|
19,678 |
|
|
9,156 |
|
|
10,522 |
Asset write-downs |
|
|
22,637 |
|
|
22,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses on investments |
|
|
2,108 |
|
|
2,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
53,590 |
|
$ |
25,559 |
|
$ |
2,513 |
|
$ |
25,518 |
|
$ |
13,582 |
|
$ |
11,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and Other Income, Net
Interest and other income, net decreased to $6.7 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 compared to $13.2 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2002. The
decrease was due to lower interest rates and invested cash balances during the first quarter of fiscal 2003.
Provision for Income
Taxes
We did not provide for income taxes for the first quarter of fiscal 2003, or the first quarter of fiscal 2002, due to the net
loss in each period. We did not record any tax benefits relating to these losses due to the uncertainty surrounding the realization of these future tax benefits.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Total cash, cash equivalents and investments were $1.02 billion at
October 26, 2002. Included in this amount were cash and cash equivalents of $269.0 million, compared to $172.7 million at July 31, 2002. The increase in cash and cash equivalents for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 was due to cash provided by
investing activities of $122.3 million and cash provided by financing activities of $0.3 million, offset by cash used in operating activities of $26.2 million.
Cash provided by investing activities of $122.3 million consisted primarily of net maturities of investments of $120.5 million. Cash provided by financing activities of $0.3 million consisted primarily of proceeds from
employee stock plan activity. Cash used in operating activities of $26.2 million consisted of the net loss for the period of $17.4 million, adjusted for non-cash charges totaling $8.0 million and changes to working capital totaling $16.8 million,
the most significant component being a decrease in accrued restructuring costs of $14.7 million. Non-cash charges include depreciation and amortization, restructuring charges and related asset impairments, and stock compensation.
16
As a result of the financial demands of major network deployments, service providers are continuing to
request financing assistance from their suppliers. From time to time we have provided extended payment terms on trade receivables to certain key customers to assist them with their network deployment plans. In addition, we may provide or commit to
extend additional credit or credit support, such as vendor financing, to our customers, as we consider appropriate in the course of our business. Our ability to provide customer financing is limited and depends on a number of factors, including our
capital structure, the level of our available credit and our ability to factor commitments. The extension of financing to our customers will limit the capital that we have available for other uses.
Currently, our primary source of liquidity comes from our cash and cash equivalents and investments, which totaled $1.02 billion at October 26, 2002. Our
investments are classified as available-for-sale and consist of securities that are readily convertible to cash, including certificates of deposits, commercial paper and government securities, with original maturities ranging from 90 days to three
years. At October 26, 2002, $382.6 million of investments with maturities of less than one year were classified as short-term investments, and $367.2 million of investments with maturities of greater than one year were classified as long-term
investments. At current revenue levels, we anticipate that some portion of our existing cash and cash equivalents and investments will continue to be consumed by operations. Our accounts receivable, while not considered a primary source of
liquidity, represents a concentration of credit risk because the accounts receivable balance at any point in time typically consists of a relatively small number of customer account balances due within one year. At October 26, 2002, more than 90% of
our accounts receivable balance was attributable to two international customers, including amounts due from one customer under an extended payment term arrangement. As of October 26, 2002, we do not have any outstanding debt or credit facilities,
and do not anticipate entering into any debt or credit agreements in the foreseeable future. Our fixed commitments for cash expenditures consist primarily of payments under operating leases. At October 26, 2002, future minimum lease payments under
non-cancelable operating leases are comprised as follows: $5.3 million for the remaining nine months of fiscal 2003, $6.5 million for fiscal 2004, $6.3 million for fiscal 2005, $3.7 million for fiscal 2006 and $6.0 million for fiscal 2007.
Based on our current plans and business conditions, we believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and investments will be
sufficient to satisfy our anticipated cash requirements for at least the next twelve months.
Factors that May Affect Future Operating
Results
Risks Related to Our Business
Our business has been, and may continue to be, adversely affected by unfavorable economic and market conditions.
As a result of unfavorable economic conditions and a sudden and severe decline in the purchasing patterns of our customers, our revenue began to decline in the third quarter of fiscal 2001, and we have
incurred significant operating losses since that time. Our net loss for fiscal 2002 was $379.7 million and for the three months ended October 26, 2002 was $17.4 million. Currently we expect to continue to incur operating losses unless revenue
increases significantly above the current levels. The economic downturn and reduced capital spending by telecommunications service providers also has resulted in longer selling cycles with extended trial periods for new equipment purchases. While we
have implemented restructuring and cost control programs to reduce our business expenses, our costs are largely based on the requirements that we believe are necessary to support sales to incumbent service providers, and a high percentage of our
expenses are, and will continue to be, fixed.
In addition to the economic downturn and the decline in capital
spending by telecommunications service providers, the ongoing economic situation following the September 2001 terrorist acts and the related military actions appears to have added additional uncertainty to an already weak overall economic
environment. Further acts of war or terrorism, or related effects such as disruptions in air transportation, enhanced security measures and political instability in certain foreign countries, may adversely affect our business, operating results and
financial condition. Although the overall economy in the United States has shown some preliminary signs of recovery in recent months, the telecommunications equipment industry has remained severely depressed. Our business and results of operations
have been and will continue to be seriously harmed if current economic conditions do not improve.
17
We are entirely dependent on our line of intelligent optical networking products and our future
revenue depends on their commercial success.
Our future revenue depends on the commercial success of our line
of intelligent optical networking products. Since the third quarter of fiscal 2001, we have narrowed the scope of our product offerings, including discontinuing the development of our standalone transport products. As of October 26, 2002, our SN
3000 Optical Edge Switch, SN 16000 and SN 16000 SC Intelligent Optical Switches and Silvx Manager Network Management System are the primary focus of our current development efforts. To be successful, we believe that we must continually enhance the
capabilities of our existing products, and successfully develop and introduce new products. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in:
|
* |
|
forecasting evolving customer requirements; |
|
* |
|
completing the development, introduction or production manufacturing of new products; or |
|
* |
|
enhancing our existing products. |
Failure of our current or future products to operate as expected could delay or prevent their adoption. If our target customers do not adopt, purchase and successfully deploy our current and future products, our results of operations
could be adversely affected.
Our line of intelligent optical networking products enables the creation of a
fundamentally different, more flexible and data-centric network architecture than those created by traditional SONET/SDH-based network equipment that has historically been used by incumbent service providers for optical networking. While we believe
that our mesh-based architecture offers significant competitive advantages over traditional SONET/SDH-based equipment, we are directing our sales efforts primarily towards incumbent service providers, many of which have made significant investments
in SONET/SDH-based equipment. If we are unable to convince incumbent service providers to deploy our intelligent optical networking solutions and transition their networks toward more flexible, data-centric mesh architectures, our business and
results of operations will be seriously harmed.
We expect that substantially all of our revenue will be generated from a limited
number of customers, and our revenue is substantially dependent upon sales of products to these customers.
Currently we have a limited number of customers. For the three months ended October 26, 2002, two international customers accounted for the majority of the Companys revenue. In any given quarter, a relatively small number of
customers typically comprise a large percentage of total revenue, though the composition of these customers may vary from quarter to quarter. During fiscal 2002, Vodafone accounted for 45% of our revenue and NTT Communications accounted for 20% of
our revenue. In fiscal 2001, Williams Communications accounted for 47% of our revenue and 360networks accounted for 11% of our revenue. In fiscal 2000, Williams accounted for 92% of our revenue.
Through fiscal 2001, a large percentage of our sales were made to emerging service providers such as Williams and 360networks. Many of these emerging service providers
have experienced severe financial difficulties, causing them to dramatically reduce their capital expenditures, and in many cases, file for bankruptcy protection. As a result, we believe that sales to emerging service providers are likely to remain
at reduced levels. To be successful, we will need to increase our sales to incumbent service providers, which typically have longer sales evaluation cycles and have also reduced their capital spending plans. In addition, we are focused on
establishing successful relationships with a variety of distribution partners. We have entered into agreements with several distribution partners, some of which also sell products that compete with our products. We cannot be certain that we will be
able to retain or attract distribution partners on a timely basis or at all, or that the distribution partners will devote adequate resources to selling our products. We have relatively limited experience in selling our products to incumbent service
providers and distribution partners. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in increasing our sales to incumbent service providers and distribution partners.
18
None of our customers are contractually committed to purchase any minimum
quantities of products from us. We expect that in the foreseeable future a majority of our revenue will continue to depend on sales of our intelligent optical networking products to a limited number of customers. The rate at which our current and
prospective customers purchase products from us will depend, in part, on their success in selling communications services based on these products to their own customers. Many incumbent service providers have recently announced reductions in their
capital expenditure budgets, reduced their revenue forecasts, or announced restructurings. Any failure of current or prospective customers to purchase products from us for any reason, including any determination not to install our products in their
networks or a downturn in their business, would seriously harm our financial condition or results of operations.
We expect gross
margins to remain at reduced levels in the near term.
Beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2001, our
gross margins declined significantly compared to historical levels. After excluding the effect of special charges and stock compensation expense, our cost of revenue exceeded revenue during the first quarter of fiscal 2003. After excluding the
effect of special charges and stock compensation expense, gross profit was 9% of revenue in fiscal 2002, as compared to 38% of revenue in fiscal 2001, and 47% of revenue in the first half of fiscal 2001, which represents the period immediately prior
to the start of the current economic downturn. We currently anticipate that gross margins are likely to continue to be adversely affected by several factors, including:
|
* |
|
reduced demand for our products; |
|
* |
|
the effects of product volumes and manufacturing efficiencies, |
|
* |
|
the mix of products and services sold; |
|
* |
|
increases in material and labor costs; |
|
* |
|
loss of cost savings due to changes in component pricing or charges incurred if we do not correctly anticipate product demand; |
|
* |
|
competitive pricing; and |
|
* |
|
possible exposure to excess and obsolete inventory charges, such as the charge which occurred in the |
first quarter of fiscal 2002.
Current economic conditions combined with our limited operating history makes forecasting difficult.
Current economic conditions in the telecommunications industry, combined with our limited operating history, make it difficult to accurately forecast revenue. At the present time, our operating expenses are largely based on
the requirements that we believe are necessary to support sales to incumbent service providers, and a high percentage of these expenses are and will continue to be fixed. Our ability to sell products and the level of success, if any, we may achieve
depend, among other things, upon the level of demand for intelligent optical networking products, which continues to be a rapidly evolving market. In addition, we continue to have limited visibility into the capital spending plans of our current and
prospective customers, which increases the difficulty of forecasting our revenue or predicting any recovery in capital spending trends. We have directed our sales efforts primarily towards incumbent service providers, many of which have historically
financed their capital expenditures using significant amounts of debt. In recent periods, many of these incumbent service providers have come under increased scrutiny from credit rating agencies and investors due to their relatively high debt
levels, which may limit their ability to make future equipment purchases. We expect that these conditions are likely to continue to limit our ability to forecast our revenue. If operating results are below the expectations of our investors and
market analysts, this could cause declines in the price of our common stock.
19
Our failure to generate sufficient revenue would prevent us from achieving profitability.
Beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2001, our revenue has declined considerably and we have incurred
significant operating losses since that time. As of October 26, 2002, we had an accumulated deficit of $698.4 million. We cannot assure you that our revenue will increase or that we will generate sufficient revenue to achieve or sustain
profitability. While we have implemented restructuring programs designed to decrease our business expenses, we will continue to have large fixed expenses and we expect to continue to incur significant sales and marketing, product development,
customer support and service, administrative and other expenses. As a result, we will need to generate significantly higher revenue over the current levels in order to achieve and maintain profitability.
The unpredictability of our quarterly results may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.
Our revenue and operating results have varied significantly from quarter to quarter. From the fourth quarter of fiscal 1999 through the
second quarter of fiscal 2001, our revenue increased each quarter sequentially compared to the previous quarter. However, beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2001, our revenue declined due to a sudden and severe decline in the purchasing
patterns of our customers, and as a result, we have incurred significant operating losses since that time. We believe that our revenue and operating results are likely to continue to vary significantly from quarter to quarter due to a number of
factors, many of which are outside of our control and any of which may cause our stock price to fluctuate. The primary factors that may affect us include the following:
|
* |
|
fluctuation in demand for intelligent optical networking products; |
|
* |
|
the timing and size of sales of our products; |
|
* |
|
capital spending constraints by our target customers; |
|
* |
|
the length and variability of the sales cycle for our products, which we believe is increasing in length, due to overall market conditions and our emphasis on
selling to incumbent service providers; |
|
* |
|
the timing of recognizing revenue and deferred revenue; |
|
* |
|
new product introductions and enhancements by our competitors and ourselves; |
|
* |
|
changes in our pricing policies or the pricing policies of our competitors; |
|
* |
|
our ability to develop, introduce and ship new products and product enhancements that meet customer requirements in a timely manner;
|
|
* |
|
delays or cancellations by customers; |
|
* |
|
our ability to obtain sufficient supplies of sole or limited source components; |
|
* |
|
increases in the prices of the components we purchase; |
|
* |
|
our ability to attain and maintain production volumes and quality levels for our products; |
|
* |
|
manufacturing lead times; |
|
* |
|
the timing and level of prototype expenses; |
|
* |
|
costs related to acquisitions of technology or businesses; |
|
* |
|
changes in accounting rules, such as any future requirement to record expenses for employee stock option grants made at fair value;
|
20
|
* |
|
actual events, circumstances, outcomes and amounts differing from judgments, assumptions, and estimates used in determining the values of certain assets,
liabilities and other items reflected in our financial statements; and |
|
* |
|
general economic conditions as well as those specific to the telecommunications, Internet and related industries. |
While we have implemented restructuring and cost control programs, we plan to continue to invest in our business, to continue to maintain
a strong product development and customer support infrastructure that will enable us to move quickly when economic conditions improve. Our operating expenses are largely based on the requirements that we believe are necessary to support sales to
incumbent service providers, and a high percentage of our expenses are, and will continue to be, fixed. As a result, we currently expect to continue to incur operating losses unless revenue increases significantly above the current levels.
Due to the foregoing factors, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our operating results are not a
good indication of our future performance. You should not rely on our results for one quarter as any indication of our future performance. Occurrences of the foregoing factors are extremely difficult to predict. In addition, our ability to forecast
our future business has been significantly impaired by the general economic downturn and the current market conditions affecting the telecommunications equipment industry. As a result, our future operating results may be below our expectations or
those of public market analysts and investors, and our net sales may continue to decline or recover at a slower rate than anticipated by us or analysts and investors. In either event, the price of our common stock could decrease.
The long and variable sales cycles for our products may cause revenue and operating results to vary significantly from quarter to quarter.
A customers decision to purchase our intelligent optical networking products involves a significant
commitment of its resources and a lengthy evaluation, testing and product qualification process. As a result, our sales cycle is lengthy and recently has increased in length, as we have directed our sales efforts primarily towards incumbent service
providers. Throughout the sales cycle, we spend considerable time and expense educating and providing information to prospective customers about the use and features of our products. Even after making a decision to purchase our products, we believe
that most customers will deploy the products slowly and deliberately. Timing of deployment can vary widely and depends on the economic environment of our customers, the skills of our customers, the size of the network deployment and the complexity
of our customers network environment. Historically, customers with complex networks have typically expanded their networks in large increments on a periodic basis. Accordingly, in the event that customer order activity increased, we could
receive purchase orders for significant dollar amounts on an irregular and unpredictable basis. Because of our limited operating history and the nature of our business, we cannot predict these sales and deployment cycles. The long sales cycles, as
well as our expectation that customers may tend to sporadically place large orders with short lead times, may cause our revenue and results of operations to vary significantly and unexpectedly from quarter to quarter.
Our products are complex and are deployed in complex environments and may have errors or defects that we find only after full deployment, which could
seriously harm our business.
Our intelligent optical networking products are complex and are designed to be
deployed in large and complex networks. Our customers may discover errors or defects in the hardware or the software, or the product may not operate as expected after it has been fully deployed. From time to time, there may be interruptions or
delays in the deployment of our products due to product performance problems or post delivery obligations. If we are unable to fix errors or other problems, or if our customers experience interruptions or delays that cannot be promptly resolved, we
could experience:
|
* |
|
loss of or delay in revenue and loss of market share; |
21
|
* |
|
failure to attract new customers or achieve market acceptance; |
|
* |
|
diversion of development resources; |
|
* |
|
increased service and warranty costs; |
|
* |
|
delays in collecting accounts receivable; |
|
* |
|
legal actions by our customers; and |
|
* |
|
increased insurance costs, |
any of which could seriously harm our financial condition or results of operations.
We may not be successful if our
customer base does not grow.
Our future success will depend on our attracting additional customers. Due to
the overall economic downturn in our industry and the financial difficulties experienced by emerging service providers and certain incumbent service providers, the number of potential customers for our products at the current time has been reduced.
Our ability to attract new customers could also be adversely affected by:
|
* |
|
customer unwillingness to implement our optical networking architecture; |
|
* |
|
difficulty in accurately forecasting evolving customer requirements; |
|
* |
|
any delays or difficulties that we may incur in completing the development, introduction and production manufacturing of our planned products or product
enhancements; |
|
* |
|
new product introductions by our competitors; |
|
* |
|
any failure of our products to perform as expected; or |
* any difficulty we may incur in meeting customers delivery, installation or performance requirements.
Our business is subject to risks from international operations.
International sales represented 87% of total revenue in fiscal 2002, and more than 50% of total revenue in the first quarter of fiscal 2003, and we expect that international sales will continue to
represent a significant portion of our revenue. Doing business internationally requires significant management attention and financial resources to successfully develop direct and indirect sales channels and to support customers in international
markets. While international sales currently represent a high percentage of total revenue, these sales are concentrated within a relatively small number of customers. We may not be able to maintain or expand international market demand for our
products.
We have relatively limited experience in marketing, distributing and supporting our products
internationally and to do so, we expect that we will need to develop versions of our products that comply with local standards. In addition, international operations are subject to other inherent risks, including:
|
* |
|
greater difficulty in accounts receivable collection and longer collection periods; |
|
* |
|
difficulties and costs of staffing and managing foreign operations in compliance with local laws and customs; |
22
|
* |
|
reliance on working with distribution partners for the resale of our products in certain markets and for certain types of product offerings, such as the
integration of our products into third-party product offerings; |
|
* |
|
necessity to work with third parties in certain countries to perform installation and obtain customer acceptance, and the resulting impact on revenue
recognition; |
|
* |
|
the impact of recessions in economies outside the United States; |
|
* |
|
unexpected changes in regulatory requirements, including trade protection measures and import and licensing requirements; |
|
* |
|
certification requirements; |
|
* |
|
reduced protection for intellectual property rights in some countries; |
|
* |
|
potentially adverse tax consequences; and |
|
* |
|
political and economic instability, particularly in emerging markets. |
We rely on single sources for supply of certain components and our business may be seriously harmed if our supply of any of these components or other components is disrupted.
We currently purchase several key components, including commercial digital signal processors, central processing units, field
programmable gate arrays, switch fabric, and SONET transceivers, from single or limited sources. We purchase each of these components on a purchase order basis and have no long-term contracts for these components. Although we believe that there are
alternative sources for each of these components, in the event of a disruption in supply, we may not be able to develop an alternate source in a timely manner or at favorable prices. Such a failure could hurt our ability to deliver our products to
our customers and negatively affect our operating margins. In addition, our reliance on our suppliers exposes us to potential supplier production difficulties or quality variations. Any disruption in supply could seriously impact our revenue and
results of operations.
Throughout the downturn in the telecommunications industry, the optical component industry
has been downsizing manufacturing capacity while consolidating product lines from earlier acquisitions. Recently, one of our suppliers announced its intention to exit the market for optical components, and several of our other suppliers have
announced reductions of their product offerings. These announcements, or similar decisions by other suppliers, could result in reduced competition and higher prices for the components we purchase. In addition, the loss of a source of supply for key
components could require us to incur additional costs to redesign our products that use those components. If any of these events occurred, our results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
We depend upon contract manufacturers and any disruption in these relationships may cause us to fail to meet the demands of our customers and damage our
customer relationships.
We have limited internal manufacturing capabilities. We rely on contract
manufacturers to manufacture our products in accordance with our specifications and to fill orders on a timely basis. Currently, the majority of our products are produced under an agreement with Jabil Circuit, Inc., which provides comprehensive
manufacturing services, including assembly, test, control and shipment to our customers, and procures material on our behalf. During the normal course of business, we may provide demand forecasts to our contract manufacturers up to six months prior
to scheduled delivery of products to our customers. If we overestimate our requirements, the contract manufacturers may assess cancellation penalties or we may have excess inventory which could negatively impact our gross margins. During the first
quarter of fiscal 2002, we recorded an excess inventory charge of $102.4 million due to a severe decline in our forecasted revenue. A portion of this charge was related to inventory purchase
23
commitments. If we underestimate our requirements, the contract manufacturers may have inadequate
inventory which could interrupt manufacturing of our products and result in delays in shipment to our customers and revenue recognition. We also could incur additional charges to manufacture our products to meet our customer deployment schedules.
We may not be able to manage our relationship with our contract manufacturers effectively, and such contract
manufacturers may not meet our future requirements for timely delivery. Our contract manufacturers also build products for other companies, and we cannot assure you that they will always have sufficient quantities of inventory available to fill
orders placed by our customers or that they will allocate their internal resources to fill these orders on a timely basis. In addition, our reliance on contract manufacturers limits our ability to control the manufacturing processes of our products,
which exposes us to risks including the unpredictability of manufacturing yields and a reduced ability to control the quality of finished products.
The contract manufacturing industry is a highly competitive, capital-intensive business with relatively low profit margins. In addition, there have been a number of major acquisitions within the
contract manufacturing industry in recent periods. While to date there has been no significant impact on our contract manufacturers, future acquisitions could potentially have an adverse effect on our working relationship with our contract
manufacturers. For example, in the event of a major acquisition involving one of our contract manufacturers, difficulties could be encountered in the merger integration process that could negatively impact our working relationship. Qualifying a new
contract manufacturer and commencing volume production is expensive and time consuming and could result in a significant interruption in the supply of our products. If we are required or choose to change contract manufacturers for any reason, we may
lose revenue and damage our customer relationships.
If we do not respond rapidly to technological changes, our products could become
obsolete.
The market for intelligent optical networking products continues to evolve, and has been
characterized by rapid technological change, frequent new product introductions and changes in customer requirements. We may be unable to respond quickly or effectively to these developments. We may experience design, manufacturing, marketing and
other difficulties that could delay or prevent our development, introduction or marketing of new products and enhancements. The introduction of new products by competitors, market acceptance of products based on new or alternative technologies or
the emergence of new industry standards could render our existing or future products obsolete.
In developing our
products, we have made, and will continue to make, assumptions about the standards that may be adopted by our customers and competitors. If the standards adopted are different from those which we have chosen to support, market acceptance of our
products may be significantly reduced or delayed and our business will be seriously harmed. The introduction of products incorporating new technologies and the emergence of new industry standards could render our existing products obsolete.
In addition, in order to introduce products incorporating new technologies and new industry standards, we must be
able to gain access to the latest technologies of our customers, our suppliers and other network vendors. Any failure to gain access to the latest technologies could impair the competitiveness of our products.
We will not retain customers or attract new customers if we do not anticipate and meet specific customer requirements or if our products do not interoperate
with our customers existing networks.
Our current and prospective customers may require product
features and capabilities that our current products do not have. To achieve market acceptance for our products, we must effectively and timely anticipate and adapt to customer requirements and offer products and services that meet customer demands.
Our failure to develop products or offer services that satisfy customer requirements would seriously harm our ability to increase demand for our products.
24
We intend to continue to invest in product and technology development. The
development of new or enhanced products is a complex and uncertain process that requires the accurate anticipation of technological and market trends and significant capital resources. We may experience design, manufacturing, marketing and other
difficulties that could delay or prevent the development, introduction, volume production or marketing of new products and enhancements. The introduction of new or enhanced products also requires that we manage the transition from older products in
order to minimize disruption in customer ordering patterns and ensure that adequate supplies of new products can be delivered to meet anticipated customer demand. Our inability to effectively manage this transition would cause us to lose current and
prospective customers.
Many of our customers utilize multiple protocol standards, and each of our customers may
have different specification requirements to interface with their existing networks. Our customers networks contain multiple generations of products that have been added over time as these networks have grown and evolved. Specifically,
incumbent service providers typically have less evolutionary networks that contain more generations of products. Our products must interoperate with all of the products within our customers networks as well as future products in order to meet
our customers requirements. The requirement that we modify product design in order to achieve a sale may result in a longer sales cycle, increased research and development expense and reduced margins on our products. If our products do not
interoperate with those of our customers networks, installations could be delayed or orders for our products could be cancelled. This would also seriously harm our reputation, all of which could seriously harm our business and prospects.
Our market is highly competitive, and our failure to compete successfully could adversely affect our market position.
Competition in the public network infrastructure market is intense. This market has historically been
dominated by large companies, such as Nortel Networks, Lucent Technologies, Alcatel and Ciena Corporation. In addition, a number of smaller companies have either announced plans for new products or introduced new products to address the same network
problems which our products address. Many of our current and potential competitors have significantly greater selling and marketing, technical, manufacturing, financial and other resources, including vendor-sponsored financing programs. Moreover,
our competitors may foresee the course of market developments more accurately and could develop new technologies that compete with our products or even render our products obsolete.
In order to compete effectively, we must deliver products that:
|
* |
|
provide extremely high network reliability; |
|
* |
|
scale easily and efficiently with minimum disruption to the network; |
|
* |
|
interoperate with existing network designs and equipment vendors; |
|
* |
|
reduce the complexity of the network by decreasing the need for overlapping equipment; |
|
* |
|
provide effective network management; and |
|
* |
|
provide a cost-effective solution for service providers. |
In addition, we believe that knowledge of the infrastructure requirements applicable to service providers, experience in working with service providers to develop new
services for their customers, and the ability to provide vendor-sponsored financing are important competitive factors in our market. We have a limited ability to provide vendor-sponsored financing and this may influence the purchasing decisions of
prospective customers, who may decide to purchase products from one of our competitors who are able to provide more extensive financing programs. Furthermore, as we are increasingly directing our sales efforts towards incumbent service providers
which typically have longer sales evaluation cycles, we believe that being able to demonstrate strong financial viability is becoming an increasingly important consideration to our customers in making their purchasing decisions.
25
If we are unable to compete successfully against our current and future
competitors, we could experience price reductions, order cancellations and reduced gross margins, any one of which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The industry in which we compete is subject to consolidation.
We believe that the industry in which we compete may enter into a consolidation phase. Recently, one of our larger competitors, Ciena Corporation, completed the acquisition of another company in our
industry, ONI Systems. Over the past two years, the market valuations of the majority of companies in our industry have declined significantly, and most companies have experienced dramatic decreases in revenue due to decreased customer demand in
general, a smaller customer base due to the financial difficulties impacting emerging service providers, reductions in capital expenditures by incumbent service providers, and other factors. We expect that the weakened financial position of many
companies in our industry may cause acquisition activity to increase. We believe that industry consolidation may result in stronger competitors that are better able to compete as sole-source vendors for customers. This could lead to more variability
in operating results as we compete to be a single vendor solution and could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition.
The intelligent optical networking market is evolving and our business will suffer if it does not develop as we expect.
The market for intelligent optical networking products continues to evolve. In recent periods, there has been a sharp decline in capital spending by our current and
prospective customers. The market for our long-haul transport equipment has substantially diminished, and as a result, we made a strategic decision to discontinue the development of our standalone transport products during the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2002. We cannot assure you that a viable market for our products will develop or be sustainable. If this market does not develop, develops more slowly than we expect or is not sustained, our business, results of operations and financial
condition would be seriously harmed.
Undetected software or hardware errors and problems arising from use of our products in
conjunction with other vendors products could result in delays or loss of market acceptance of our products.
Networking products frequently contain undetected software or hardware errors when first introduced or as new versions are released. We expect that errors will be found from time to time in new or enhanced products after we begin
commercial shipments. In addition, service providers typically use our products in conjunction with products from other vendors. As a result, when problems occur, it may be difficult to identify the source of the problem. These problems may cause us
to incur significant warranty, support and repair costs, divert the attention of our engineering personnel from our product development efforts and cause significant customer relations problems. The occurrence of these problems could result in the
delay or loss of market acceptance of our products and would likely have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Defects, integration issues or other performance problems in our products could result
in financial or other damages to our customers or could damage market acceptance for our products. Our customers could also seek damages for losses from us. A product liability claim brought against us, even if unsuccessful, would likely be time
consuming and costly.
Our failure to establish and maintain key customer relationships may result in delays in introducing new
products or cause customers to forego purchasing our products.
Our future success will also depend upon our
ability to develop and manage key customer relationships in order to introduce a variety of new products and product enhancements that address the increasingly sophisticated needs of our customers. Our failure to establish and maintain these
customer relationships may adversely affect our ability to develop new products and product enhancements. In addition, we may experience delays in releasing new products and product enhancements in the future. Material delays in introducing new
products and enhancements or our inability to introduce competitive new products may cause customers to forego purchases of our products and purchase those of our competitors, which could seriously harm our business.
26
The majority of our product sales to date have been to emerging service providers
rather than incumbent service providers. We believe that it is important for us to increase our sales to incumbent service providers, including incumbent local exchange carriers such as the Regional Bell Operating Companies (RBOCs).
Incumbent service providers typically have longer sales evaluation cycles than emerging service providers, and we have limited experience in selling our products to incumbent service providers. In addition, we are currently investing in product
certification standards such as the OSMINE standard, which will be necessary for us to increase our sales to the RBOCs. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002, we successfully completed certification with two OSMINE processes for the current
releases of all of our switching products. While we have made a commitment to invest resources in obtaining these certification standards, there is no assurance that such efforts will enable us to increase our sales to incumbent service providers.
Furthermore, while we received certification with our latest software releases, subsequent releases of software on our products may require further investment of resources and requests for OSMINE certification. Our assessment of future business
opportunities will guide our decision to pursue future certifications, if necessary. Any failure to establish or maintain strong customer relationships including product certification standards could have a material adverse effect on our business
and results of operations.
Our failure to continually improve our internal controls and systems, and retain needed personnel could
adversely affect our results of operations.
Since inception, the scope of our operations has increased and we
have grown our headcount substantially. However, beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2001, our headcount levels have been reduced significantly, due primarily to our restructuring activities. At October 26, 2002, we had a total of 414
employees, which represents a reduction of approximately 60% from headcount levels immediately prior to the restructuring actions. Our initial growth, followed by more recent headcount reductions, has placed a significant strain on our management
systems and resources. Our ability to successfully offer our products and services and implement our business plan in a rapidly evolving market requires an effective planning and management process. We expect that we will need to continue to improve
our financial, managerial and manufacturing controls and reporting systems, and will need to effectively manage our headcount levels worldwide. We may not be able to implement adequate control systems in an efficient and timely manner. In spite of
recent economic conditions, competition for highly skilled personnel is intense, especially in the New England area where we are headquartered. Any failure to attract, assimilate or retain qualified personnel to fulfill our current or future needs
could adversely affect our results of operations.
We depend on our key personnel to manage our business effectively in a rapidly
changing market, and if we are unable to retain our key employees, our ability to compete could be harmed.
We
depend on the continued services of our executive officers and other key engineering, sales, marketing and support personnel, who have critical industry experience and relationships that we rely on to implement our business plan. None of our
officers or key employees is bound by an employment agreement for any specific term. We do not have key person life insurance policies covering any of our employees. All of our key employees have been granted stock-based awards which are
intended to represent an integral component of their compensation package. These stock-based awards may not provide the intended incentive to our employees if our stock price declines or experiences significant volatility. The loss of the services
of any of our key employees, the inability to attract and retain qualified personnel in the future, or delays in hiring qualified personnel could delay the development and introduction of, and negatively impact our ability to sell, our products.
If we become subject to unfair hiring, wrongful termination or other employment related claims, we could incur substantial costs in
defending ourselves.
Companies in our industry, whose employees accept positions with competitors,
frequently claim that their competitors have engaged in unfair hiring practices. We cannot assure you that we will not become parties to claims of this kind or other claims relating to our employees, or that those claims will not result in material
litigation. In
27
response to changing business conditions, we have terminated approximately 600 employees since the third quarter of fiscal 2001, and as a
result, we may face claims relating to their compensation and/or wrongful termination based on discrimination. We could incur substantial costs in defending ourselves or our employees against such claims, regardless of the merits of such actions. In
addition, such claims could divert the attention of our management away from our operations.
We face certain litigation risks.
We are a party to lawsuits in the normal course of our business. Litigation can be expensive, lengthy, and
disruptive to normal business operations. Moreover, the results of complex legal proceedings are difficult to predict. An unfavorable resolution of a particular lawsuit could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, or
financial condition. For additional information regarding certain of the lawsuits in which we are involved, see Part II, Item 1Legal Proceedings.
Our ability to compete could be jeopardized if we are unable to protect our intellectual property rights from third-party challenges.
We rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws and restrictions on disclosure to protect our intellectual property rights. We also enter
into confidentiality or license agreements with our employees, consultants and corporate partners and control access to and distribution of our software, documentation and other proprietary information. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary
rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or otherwise obtain and use our products or technology.
Monitoring unauthorized use of our products is difficult and we cannot be certain that the steps we have taken will prevent unauthorized use of our technology, particularly in foreign countries where the laws may not protect our
proprietary rights as fully as in the United States. If competitors are able to use our technology, our ability to compete effectively could be harmed.
If necessary licenses of third-party technology are not available to us or are very expensive, the competitiveness of our products could be impaired.
From time to time we may be required to license technology from third parties to develop new products or product enhancements. We cannot assure you that third-party
licenses will be available to us on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. The inability to obtain any third-party license required to develop new products and product enhancements could require us to obtain substitute technology of lower quality
or performance standards or at greater cost, either of which could seriously harm the competitiveness of our products.
We could
become subject to claims regarding intellectual property rights, which could seriously harm our business and require us to incur significant costs.
In recent years, there has been significant litigation in the United States involving patents and other intellectual property rights. Our industry in particular is characterized by the existence of a
large number of patents and frequent claims and related litigation regarding patents and other intellectual property rights. In the course of our business, we may receive claims of infringement or otherwise become aware of potentially relevant
patents or other intellectual property rights held by other parties. We evaluate the validity and applicability of these intellectual property rights, and determine in each case whether we must negotiate licenses or cross-licenses to incorporate or
use the proprietary technologies in our products.
Any parties asserting that our products infringe upon their
proprietary rights would force us to defend ourselves and possibly our customers, manufacturers or suppliers against the alleged infringement. Regardless of their merit, these claims could result in costly litigation and subject us to the risk of
significant liability for damages.
28
These claims, again regardless of their merit, would likely be time consuming and expensive to resolve,
would divert management time and attention and would put us at risk to:
|
* |
|
stop selling, incorporating or using our products that use the challenged intellectual property; |
|
* |
|
obtain from the owner of the intellectual property right a license to sell or use the relevant technology, which license may not be available on reasonable
terms, or at all; |
|
* |
|
redesign those products that use such technology; or |
|
* |
|
accept a return of products that use such technologies. |
If we are forced to take any of the foregoing actions, our business may be seriously harmed.
Any acquisitions or strategic investments we make could disrupt our business and seriously harm our financial condition.
As part of our ongoing business development strategy, we consider acquisitions and strategic investments in complementary companies, products or technologies. We completed
the acquisition of Sirocco Systems, Inc. in September 2000, and may consider making other acquisitions from time to time. In the event of an acquisition, we could:
|
* |
|
issue stock that would dilute our current stockholders percentage ownership; |
|
* |
|
consume cash, which would reduce the amount of cash available for other purposes; |
|
* |
|
increase our ongoing operating expenses and level of fixed costs; |
|
* |
|
record goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets that will be subject to impairment testing and potential periodic impairment charges;
|
|
* |
|
incur amortization expenses related to certain intangible assets; |
|
* |
|
incur large and immediate write-offs; or |
|
* |
|
become subject to litigation. |
Our ability to achieve the benefits of any acquisition, will also involve numerous risks, including:
|
* |
|
problems combining the purchased operations, technologies or products; |
|
* |
|
diversion of managements attention from other business issues and opportunities; |
|
* |
|
adverse effects on existing business relationships with suppliers and customers; |
|
* |
|
risks associated with entering markets in which we have no or limited prior experience; and |
|
* |
|
problems with integrating employees and potential loss of key employees. |
29
We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully integrate any
businesses, products, technologies or personnel that we might acquire in the future and any failure to do so could disrupt our business and seriously harm our financial condition.
As of October 26, 2002, we have made strategic investments in privately held companies totaling approximately $26.0 million, and we may decide to make additional
investments in the future. In fiscal 2002, we recorded impairment losses of $24.8 million relating to these investments. These types of investments are inherently risky as the market for the technologies or products they have under
development are typically in the early stages and may never materialize. We could lose our entire investment in certain or all of these companies.
Any extension of credit to our customers may subject us to credit risks and limit the capital that we have available for other uses.
We continue to receive requests for financing assistance from customers and potential customers and we expect these requests to continue. We believe the ability to offer financing assistance can be a
competitive factor in obtaining business. From time to time we have provided extended payment terms on trade receivables to certain key customers to assist them with their network deployment plans. In addition, we may provide or commit to extend
additional credit or credit support, such as vendor financing, to our customers as we consider appropriate in the course of our business. Such financing activities subject us to the credit risk of customers whom we finance. In addition, our ability
to recognize revenue from financed sales will depend upon the relative financial condition of the specific customer, among other factors. Although we have programs in place to monitor the risk associated with vendor financing, we cannot assure you
that such programs will be effective in reducing our risk of an impaired ability to pay on the part of a customer whom we have financed. We could experience losses due to customers failing to meet their financial obligations which could harm our
business and materially adversely affect our operating results and financial condition, such as the losses that we incurred during the first quarter of fiscal 2002.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2002, we experienced losses relating to our two existing vendor financing customers, as each of them experienced a significant
deterioration in their financial condition. As a result, we determined that we were unlikely to realize any significant proceeds from these vendor financing agreements. Accordingly, we recorded an impairment charge for the assets related to these
financing agreements, which consisted of the cost of the systems shipped to the vendor financing customers, and had been classified in other long-term assets.
Risks Related to the Securities Market
Our stock price may continue to be volatile.
Historically, the market for technology stocks has been extremely volatile. Our common stock has experienced, and may continue
to experience, substantial price volatility. The following factors could cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate significantly:
|
* |
|
our loss of a major customer; |
|
* |
|
significant changes or slowdowns in the funding and spending patterns of our current and prospective customers; |
|
* |
|
the addition or departure of key personnel; |
|
* |
|
variations in our quarterly operating results; |
|
* |
|
announcements by us or our competitors of significant contracts, new products or product enhancements; |
30
|
* |
|
failure by us to meet product milestones; |
|
* |
|
acquisitions, distribution partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments; |
|
* |
|
variations between our actual results and the published expectations of analysts; |
|
* |
|
changes in financial estimates by securities analysts; |
|
* |
|
sales of our common stock or other securities in the future; |
|
* |
|
changes in market valuations of networking and telecommunications companies; and |
|
* |
|
fluctuations in stock market prices and volumes. |
In addition, the stock market in general, and the Nasdaq National Market and technology companies in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or
disproportionate to the operating performance of such companies. These broad market and industry factors may materially adversely affect the market price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. In the past, following
periods of volatility in the market price of a companys securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against such companies.
There may be sales of a substantial amount of our common stock that could cause our stock price to fall, or increase the volatility of our stock price.
As of October 26, 2002, options to purchase a total of 32.5 million shares of our common stock were outstanding. While these options are subject to vesting schedules, a
number of the shares underlying these options are freely tradable. Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock could cause our stock price to fall or increase the volatility of our stock price. In addition, sales of shares by our
stockholders could impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional stock.
Insiders own a substantial number of
Sycamore shares and could limit your ability to influence the outcome of key transactions, including changes of control.
As of October 26, 2002, our officers, directors and entities affiliated with them, in the aggregate, beneficially owned approximately 40.3% of our outstanding common stock. These stockholders, if acting together, would be able to
significantly influence matters requiring approval by our stockholders, including the election of directors and the approval of mergers or other business combination transactions.
Provisions of our charter documents and Delaware law may have anti-takeover effects that could prevent a change of control.
Provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, by-laws, and Delaware law could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if doing
so would be beneficial to our stockholders.
31
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
The following discussion about our market risk
involves forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. We do not use
derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes.
Interest Rate Sensitivity
We maintain a portfolio of cash equivalents and short-term and long-term investments in a variety of securities including commercial paper, certificates of
deposit, money market funds and government debt securities. These available-for-sale investments are subject to interest rate risk and may fall in value if market interest rates increase. If market interest rates increase immediately and uniformly
by 10 percent from levels at October 26, 2002, the fair value of the portfolio would decline by approximately $1.4 million. We have the ability to hold our fixed income investments until maturity, and therefore do not expect our operating results or
cash flows to be affected to any significant degree by the effect of a sudden change in market interest rates on our investment portfolio.
Exchange Rate Sensitivity
We operate primarily in the United States, and the majority of our sales since
inception have been made in US dollars. However, our business has become increasingly global, with international revenue representing 87% of total revenue in fiscal 2002, and more than 50% of total revenue in the first quarter of fiscal 2003, and we
expect that international sales will continue to represent a significant portion of our revenue. Fluctuations in foreign currencies may have an impact on our financial results, although to date the impact has not been material. We are prepared to
hedge against fluctuations in foreign currencies if the exposure is material, although we have not engaged in hedging activities to date.
Item 4.
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. An evaluation was performed
under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-14(c) and
15d-14(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have
concluded that, as of the date the evaluation was conducted, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective in alerting them on a timely basis to material information relating to the Company (including its consolidated
subsidiaries) required to be included in the Companys reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act.
(b) Changes in Internal
Controls. There were no significant changes in the Companys internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation.
32
Part II.
Other Information
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
Beginning on July 2, 2001, several purported class action complaints were filed in the
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against the Company and several of its officers and directors (the Individual Defendants) and the underwriters for the Companys initial public offering on October
21, 1999. Some of the complaints also include the underwriters for the Companys follow-on offering on March 14, 2000. The complaints were consolidated into a single action and an amended complaint was filed on April 19, 2002. The amended
complaint was filed on behalf of persons who purchased the Companys common stock between October 21, 1999 and December 6, 2000. The amended complaint alleges violations of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, primarily based on the assertion that the Companys lead underwriters, the Company and the other named defendants made material false and misleading statements in the Companys Registration Statements and Prospectuses
filed with the SEC in October 1999 and March 2000 because of the failure to disclose (a) the alleged solicitation and receipt of excessive and undisclosed commissions by the underwriters in connection with the allocation of shares of common stock to
certain investors in the Companys public offerings and (b) that certain of the underwriters allegedly had entered into agreements with investors whereby underwriters agreed to allocate the public offering shares in exchange for which the
investors agreed to make additional purchases of stock in the aftermarket at pre-determined prices. The amended complaint alleges claims against the Company, several of the Companys officers and directors and the underwriters under Sections 11
and 15 of the Securities Act. It also alleges claims against the Company, the individual defendants and the underwriters under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act. The action against the Company is being coordinated with over
three hundred other nearly identical actions filed against other companies. The actions seek damages in an unspecified amount. A motion to dismiss addressing issues common to the companies and individuals who have been sued in these actions was
filed on July 15, 2002. An opposition to that motion was filed on behalf of the plaintiffs and a reply brief was filed on behalf of the defendants. The fully briefed issues are now pending before the court and oral arguments were heard on November
1, 2002. On October 9, 2002, the court dismissed the Individual Defendants from the case without prejudice based upon Stipulations of Dismissal filed by the plaintiffs and the Individual Defendants. The Company believes that the claims against it
are without merit and intends to defend against the complaints vigorously. The Company is not currently able to estimate the possibility of loss or range of loss, if any, relating to these claims.
The Company is subject to legal proceedings, claims, and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these matters is currently
not determinable, management does not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations or financial position.
33
Item 6.
Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
Exhibits:
(a) List of Exhibits
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
3.1 |
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (2) |
|
3.2 |
|
Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (2)
|
|
3.3 |
|
Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (3)
|
|
3.4 |
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company (2) |
|
4.1 |
|
Specimen common stock certificate (1) |
|
4.2 |
|
See Exhibits 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4, for provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws of the Registrant defining the rights of holders of common stock of the Company (2)(3) |
|
10.1 |
|
Indemnification Agreement between the Company and Paul W. Chisholm |
|
99.1(a) |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
99.1(b) |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Sycamore Networks, Inc.s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration Statement No. 333-84635).
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Sycamore Networks, Inc.s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration Statement No. 333-30630).
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Sycamore Networks, Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended January 27, 2001 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 13, 2001. |
(b) Reports on Form 8-K : None
34
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Sycamore Networks, Inc. |
|
/s/ Frances M. Jewels
|
Frances M. Jewels Chief Financial Officer (Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
Dated: December 6, 2002
35
I, Daniel E. Smith, certify that:
|
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sycamore Networks, Inc.; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report. |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: |
|
a) |
|
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; |
|
b) |
|
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly
report (the Evaluation Date); and |
|
c) |
|
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date; |
|
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|
a) |
|
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
|
b) |
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and
|
|
6. |
|
The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
|
Date: December 6, 2002
|
/s/ DANIEL E. SMITH
|
Daniel E. Smith Chief Executive
Officer |
36
I, Frances M. Jewels, certify that:
|
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sycamore Networks, Inc.; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report. |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: |
|
a) |
|
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; |
|
b) |
|
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly
report (the Evaluation Date); and |
|
c) |
|
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date; |
|
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|
a) |
|
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
|
b) |
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and
|
|
6. |
|
The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
|
Date: December 6, 2002
|
/s/ FRANCES M. JEWELS
|
Frances M. Jewels Chief
Financial Officer |
37
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
3.1 |
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (2) |
|
3.2 |
|
Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (2)
|
|
3.3 |
|
Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (3)
|
|
3.4 |
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company (2) |
|
4.1 |
|
Specimen common stock certificate (1) |
|
4.2 |
|
See Exhibits 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4, for provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws of the Registrant defining the rights of holders of common stock of the Company (2)(3) |
|
10.1 |
|
Indemnification Agreement between the Company and Paul W. Chisholm |
|
99.1(a) |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
99.1(b) |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Sycamore Networks, Inc.s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration Statement No. 333-84635).
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Sycamore Networks, Inc.s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration Statement No. 333-30630).
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Sycamore Networks, Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended January 27, 2001 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 13, 2001. |
38