_________________
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _______ to ________
Commission file number 000-22461
OAK FINANCIAL
CORPORATION
(Exact name of
registrant as specified in its charter)
MICHIGAN (State of other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
38-2817345 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
2445 84th Street,
S.W., Byron Center, Michigan 49315
(Address of principal
executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (616) 878-1591
_________________
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X] No [__].
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).
Yes [X] No [__].
The number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 2,035,191 shares of the Corporations Common Stock ($1 par value) were outstanding as of November 9, 2004.
Part I. |
Financial Information (unaudited): |
Page Number(s) |
Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
3 - 6 7 - 9 |
|
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
9 - 18 | |
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
18 | |
Item 4. Controls and Procedures |
19 |
Part | II. Other Information | |
Item 1. Legal Proceedings |
19 | |
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
19 | |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
19 | |
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
19 | |
Item 5. Other Information |
19 | |
Item 6. Exhibits |
19 | |
Signatures |
20 | |
Exhibit Index |
21 |
2
OAK FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY |
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS |
---|---|
(in thousands) |
September 30, 2004 (Unaudited) | December 31, 2003 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASSETS | ||||||||
Cash and due from banks | $ | 9,713 | $ | 12,431 | ||||
Federal funds sold | 600 | 7,100 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 10,313 | 19,531 | ||||||
Available-for-sale securities | 96,023 | 103,395 | ||||||
Loans held for sale | 1,405 | 1,705 | ||||||
Portfolio loans | 394,562 | 363,565 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses | (8,054 | ) | (8,390 | ) | ||||
Net Loans | 386,508 | 355,175 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable | 2,431 | 2,266 | ||||||
Premises and equipment, net | 13,945 | 14,428 | ||||||
Restricted investments | 3,051 | 2,977 | ||||||
Other assets | 7,676 | 9,056 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 521,352 | $ | 508,533 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||||||
Deposits | ||||||||
Non-interest bearing | $ | 56,711 | $ | 49,814 | ||||
Interest bearing | 319,070 | 321,250 | ||||||
Total deposits | 375,781 | 371,064 | ||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase | ||||||||
and federal funds purchased | 55,571 | 44,338 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) Advances | 29,000 | 33,000 | ||||||
Borrowed funds | 1,405 | 1,491 | ||||||
Other liabilities | 3,046 | 3,560 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 464,803 | 453,453 | ||||||
Stockholders' equity | ||||||||
Common stock, $1 par value; 4,000,000 shares authorized; | ||||||||
2,035,191 shares issued and outstanding | 2,035 | 2,035 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 6,023 | 6,023 | ||||||
Retained earnings | 47,544 | 45,774 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income | 947 | 1,248 | ||||||
Total stockholders' equity | 56,549 | 55,080 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ | 521,352 | $ | 508,533 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
-3-
OAK FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Dollars in thousands except per share data) | Three and Nine Months ended September 30, (Unaudited) | |||||||||||||
Three Months | Nine Months | |||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||
Interest Income | ||||||||||||||
Loans (including fees) | $ | 5,371 | $ | 5,426 | $ | 15,564 | $ | 17,625 | ||||||
Available-for-sale securities | 769 | 820 | 2,466 | 2,493 | ||||||||||
Restricted investments | 37 | 37 | 112 | 119 | ||||||||||
Other | 13 | 51 | 37 | 210 | ||||||||||
Total interest income | 6,190 | 6,334 | 18,179 | 20,447 | ||||||||||
Interest expense | ||||||||||||||
Deposits | 1,595 | 1,703 | 4,795 | 5,858 | ||||||||||
Borrowed funds | 425 | 443 | 1,301 | 1,329 | ||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase | 90 | 101 | 255 | 392 | ||||||||||
Total interest expense | 2,110 | 2,247 | 6,351 | 7,579 | ||||||||||
Net interest income | 4,080 | 4,087 | 11,828 | 12,868 | ||||||||||
Provision for loan losses | - | 100 | - | 625 | ||||||||||
Net interest income after provision | 4,080 | 3,987 | 11,828 | 12,243 | ||||||||||
Non-interest income | ||||||||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts | 646 | 555 | 1,819 | 1,591 | ||||||||||
Mortgage banking | 285 | 588 | 982 | 1,429 | ||||||||||
Net gain on sales of available for sale securities .. | 27 | 3 | 233 | 4 | ||||||||||
Insurance premiums and brokerage fees | 327 | 384 | 1,111 | 1,204 | ||||||||||
Other | 97 | 370 | 296 | 526 | ||||||||||
Total non-interest income | 1,382 | 1,900 | 4,441 | 4,754 | ||||||||||
Non-interest expenses | ||||||||||||||
Salaries | 2,144 | 2,144 | 6,344 | 5,975 | ||||||||||
Employee benefits | 545 | 450 | 1,623 | 1,459 | ||||||||||
Occupancy (net) | 318 | 313 | 973 | 950 | ||||||||||
Furniture and fixtures | 267 | 258 | 818 | 815 | ||||||||||
Other | 938 | 1,078 | 2,863 | 3,701 | ||||||||||
Total non-interest expenses | 4,212 | 4,243 | 12,621 | 12,900 | ||||||||||
Income before federal income taxes | 1,250 | 1,644 | 3,648 | 4,097 | ||||||||||
Federal income taxes | 331 | 466 | 965 | 1,133 | ||||||||||
Net income | $ | 919 | $ | 1,178 | $ | 2,683 | $ | 2,964 | ||||||
Income per common share: | ||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.45 | $ | 0.58 | $ | 1.32 | $ | 1.46 | ||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.45 | $ | 0.58 | $ | 1.32 | $ | 1.46 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
-4-
OAK FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(in thousands) | Nine Months ended September 30, (Unaudited) | |||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||
Balance, beginning of year | $ | 55,080 | $ | 52,606 | ||||
Net income | 2,683 | 2,964 | ||||||
Net change in accumulated other comprehensive income | (301 | ) | (494 | ) | ||||
Dividends paid | (913 | ) | (490 | ) | ||||
Allocation of Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) shares | - | 37 | ||||||
Balance, end of period | $ | 56,549 | $ | 54,623 | ||||
OAK FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(in thousands) | Three and Nine Months ended September 30, (Unaudited) | |||||||||||||
Three Months | Nine Months | |||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||
Net income | $ | 919 | $ | 1,178 | $ | 2,683 | $ | 2,964 | ||||||
Change in unrealized gain/(loss) on securities, | ||||||||||||||
net of tax | 737 | (507 | ) | (301 | ) | (494 | ) | |||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 1,656 | $ | 671 | $ | 2,382 | $ | 2,470 | ||||||
-5-
OAK FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS |
---|---|
(in thousands) |
Nine Months Ended September 30, (Unaudited) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 | 2003 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 2,683 | $ | 2,964 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net | ||||||||
cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 881 | 826 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses | - | 625 | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale | 53,630 | 152,425 | ||||||
Originations of loans held for sale | (52,828 | ) | (153,615 | ) | ||||
Net gain on sales of available-for-sale securities | (233 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||
Net gain on sales of loans held for sale | (502 | ) | (1,238 | ) | ||||
Net amortization of investment premiums | 706 | 629 | ||||||
(Gain) / Loss on sales of property and equipment | (23 | ) | 6 | |||||
Deferred federal income tax benefit | (173 | ) | (191 | ) | ||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities which (used) provided cash: | ||||||||
Accrued interest receivable | (165 | ) | 317 | |||||
Other assets | 1,554 | (977 | ) | |||||
Other liabilities | (360 | ) | (115 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 5,170 | 1,652 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities | ||||||||
Available-for-sale securities | ||||||||
Proceeds from calls, maturities and paydowns | 17,469 | 14,452 | ||||||
Proceeds from sales | 8,546 | 72 | ||||||
Purchases | (19,573 | ) | (34,158 | ) | ||||
Purchases of restricted investments | (73 | ) | (52 | ) | ||||
Net decrease (increase) in loans held for investment | (31,334 | ) | 25,407 | |||||
Purchases of premises and equipment | (405 | ) | (371 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from the sale of premises and equipment | 30 | 2 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used) in investing activities | (25,340 | ) | 5,352 | |||||
Cash flows from financing activities | ||||||||
Net (decrease) increase in deposits | 4,717 | (33,488 | ) | |||||
Net increase in TT&L note | (85 | ) | (370 | ) | ||||
Net borrowed funds (repayments) | (4,000 | ) | (1,000 | ) | ||||
Dividends paid | (913 | ) | (490 | ) | ||||
Net decrease in securities sold under | ||||||||
agreements to repurchase | 11,233 | 2,277 | ||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | 10,952 | (33,071 | ) | |||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (9,218 | ) | (26,067 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 19,531 | 57,004 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 10,313 | $ | 30,937 | ||||
Supplementary cash flows information | ||||||||
Interest paid | $ | 6,551 | $ | 8,007 | ||||
Income taxes paid | $ | 441 | $ | 843 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
-6-
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions of Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the year-to-date and three-month periods ended September 30, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2004. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Corporations annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
All earnings per share amounts have been presented to conform to the requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 128, Earnings Per Share. Basic earnings per share exclude any dilutive effect of stock options. The basic earnings per share for the Corporation is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share for the Corporation is computed by dividing net income by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the dilutive effect of outstanding stock options. The following table summarizes the number of shares used in the denominator of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations:
Three Months ended September 30, | Nine Months ended September 30, | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||
Average shares outstanding | 2,035 | 2,041 | 2,035 | 2,041 | ||||||||||
Average ESOP shares not committed to be released | - | (6 | ) | - | (6 | ) | ||||||||
Shares outstanding for basic earnings per share | 2,035 | 2,035 | 2,035 | 2,035 | ||||||||||
Dilutive shares from stock option plans | 1 | - | - | - | ||||||||||
Shares for dilutive earnings per share | 2,036 | 2,035 | 2,035 | 2,035 | ||||||||||
The Corporation provides a broad range of financial products and services through its branch network in West Michigan. While the Corporations chief decision makers monitor the revenue streams of various products and services, operations are managed and financial performance is evaluated on a corporate wide basis. Accordingly, all of the Corporations operations are aggregated in one reportable operating segment.
OAK ELC is an employee leasing company that leases employees to Byron Center State Bank, OAK Financial Services and Dornbush Insurance Agency. The purpose of OAK ELC is to reduce the administrative burden of multiple payrolls, minimize the payroll tax reporting burden, and allocate shared employment costs between business units. The financial results of OAK ELC and elimination of inter-company transactions are included in the consolidated results of the Corporation.
The allowance for loan losses is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the loan balance is uncollectible. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.
The allowance for loan losses is evaluated frequently by management and is based upon a periodic review of the collectibility of the loans in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrowers ability to repay, estimated value of underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.
-7-
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Corporation will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due, according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrowers prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on an individual loan basis for commercial and construction loans by either: the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the loans effective interest rate; the loans obtainable market price; or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.
The primary components of the balance sheet are interest-earning assets, which are funded by interest-bearing liabilities. The differences in cash flows of these rate sensitive assets and liabilities, combined with shifts, or changes in the overall market yield curve result in interest rate risk. Interest rate risk is the change in net interest income due to interest rate changes. Interest rate risk is inherent to banking and cannot be eliminated.
The Asset and Liability Management Committee (ALCO) is responsible for overseeing the financial management of net interest income, liquidity, investment transactions, and other related activities. To address interest rate risk, management utilizes simulation analysis to assess risk in dynamic interest rate environments.
Note 7 Stock Compensation and Stock Option Plans (dollars in thousands, except per share data)
The Corporation maintains stock option plans for non-employee directors (the Directors Plan) and employees and officers of the Corporation and its subsidiary (the Employees Plan). The stock compensation plans were established in 1999, and authorize the issue of up to 165,000 options under the Employees Plan and up to 35,000 options under the Directors Plan.
Options under both plans become exercisable after the first anniversary of the award date. The option exercise price is at least 100% of the market value of the common stock at the grant date. During 2004, 1,000 options were awarded at an exercise price of $45.00. No options were awarded in the year 2003. The following tables summarize information about stock option transactions:
September 30, 2004 | September 30, 2003 | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shares | Average Option Price | Shares | Average Option Price | |||||||||||
Outstanding, beginning of period | 37,130 | $ | 49.35 | 44,130 | $ | 49.62 | ||||||||
Granted | 1,000 | 45.00 | - | - | ||||||||||
Exercised | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||
Forfeited/expired | (8,012 | ) | 49.57 | (7,000 | ) | 51.04 | ||||||||
Outstanding, end of period | 30,118 | $ | 49.15 | 37,130 | $ | 49.35 | ||||||||
Exercisable, end of period | 29,118 | $ | 49.29 | 35,130 | $ | 49.63 | ||||||||
Outstanding | Exercisable | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Exercise Price | Number September 30, 2004 | Wgt. Avg. Remaining Contractual Life | Number September 30, 2004 | ||||||||
$44.50 | 9,692 | 7.4 years | 9,692 | ||||||||
$45.00 | 1,000 | 9.5 years | - | ||||||||
$50.00 | 12,894 | 5.5 years | 12,894 | ||||||||
$55.00 | 6,532 | 5.3 years | 6,532 | ||||||||
Total | 30,118 | 6.2 years | 29,118 | ||||||||
-8-
All options expire 10 years after the date of the grant; 144,125 shares are reserved for future issuance under the Employees Plan and 25,000 shares are reserved for future issuance under the Directors Plan.
SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, encourages all entities to adopt a fair value based method of accounting for stock compensation plans, whereby compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is recognized over the service period, which is usually the vesting period.
Had compensation costs for the Corporations stock option plans been determined based on fair value at the grant dates for awards under the plans consistent with the method prescribed by FASB 123, the Corporations net income and earnings per share would have been adjusted to the pro forma amounts indicated below:
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||
Net Income as reported | $ | 919 | $ | 1,178 | $ | 2,683 | $ | 2,964 | ||||||
Stock based compensation expense determined | ||||||||||||||
under fair value method, net of related tax effect | (1 | ) | - | (2 | ) | (12 | ) | |||||||
Pro-forma net income | $ | 918 | $ | 1,178 | $ | 2,681 | $ | 2,952 | ||||||
Basic earnings per share as reported | $ | 0.45 | $ | 0.58 | $ | 1.32 | $ | 1.46 | ||||||
Pro-forma basic earnings per share as reported | $ | 0.45 | $ | 0.58 | $ | 1.32 | $ | 1.45 | ||||||
Diluted earnings per share as reported | $ | 0.45 | $ | 0.58 | $ | 1.32 | $ | 1.46 | ||||||
Pro-forma diluted earnings per share as reported | $ | 0.45 | $ | 0.58 | $ | 1.32 | $ | 1.45 |
This report includes forward-looking statements as that term is used in the securities laws. All statements regarding our expected financial position, business and strategies are forward-looking statements. In addition, the words anticipates, believes, estimates, seeks, expects, plans, intends, and similar expressions, as they relate to us or our management, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The presentation and discussion of the provision and allowance for loan losses, valuation of mortgage service rights and statements concerning future profitability or future growth or increases, are examples of inherently forward looking statements in that they involve judgments and statements of belief as to the outcome of future events. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse affect on our operations and our future prospects include, but are not limited to, changes in: interest rates, general economic conditions, legislative/regulatory changes, monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. Government, including policies of the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve Board, the quality or composition of the loan or investment portfolios, demand for loan products, deposit flows, competition, demand for financial services in our market area and accounting principles, policies and guidelines. These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Further information concerning us and our business, including additional factors that could materially affect our financial results, has been included within our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
OAK Financial Corporation (the Corporation) is a single bank holding company, which owns OAK ELC (which is discussed above under Special Purpose Entities), and Byron Center State Bank (the Bank). The Bank has twelve banking offices serving communities in Kent, Ottawa and Allegan Counties. The Bank owns a subsidiary, OAK Financial Services. OAK Financial Services offers mutual fund products, securities brokerage services, retirement planning services, investment management and advisory services. OAK Financial Services owns Dornbush Insurance Agency, which sells property, casualty, life, disability and long-term health care insurance products.
-9-
The following is managements discussion and analysis of the factors that influenced OAK Financial Corporations financial performance. The discussion should be read in conjunction with the Corporations 2003 annual report on Form 10-K and the audited financial statements and notes contained therein.
The Corporations consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and follow general practices within the banking and other industries in which it operates. Certain of the Corporations accounting policies are important to the portrayal of the Corporations financial condition, since they require management to make difficult, complex or subjective judgments, some of which may relate to matters that are inherently uncertain. Estimates associated with these policies are susceptible to material changes as a result of changes in facts and circumstances. Facts and circumstances which could affect these judgments include, but without limitation, changes in interest rate, in local and national economic conditions, or the financial condition of borrowers. The Corporations accounting policies are discussed in detail in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on pages 35 through 38 in the Corporations Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (10-K Report). Management believes that its most significant accounting policies include determining the allowance for loan losses, assessing the risk of individual loans and the risk of the overall commercial loan portfolio and the valuation of mortgage servicing rights. These are discussed on page 10 of the 10-K Report.
Total assets increased by $13 million, or 2.52% from December 31, 2003 to September 30, 2004. The significant changes include a decline in cash and cash equivalents of $9 million, a decrease in securities available for sale of $7 million and an increase in net loans receivable of $31 million.
Correspondingly, total liabilities increased $11 million, or 2.50% during the nine months ended September 30, 2004. The significant changes were an increase in total deposits of $5 million, an increase in repurchase agreements of $11 million and a decrease in FHLB Advances of $4 million.
The Corporation maintains a diversified securities portfolio, which includes obligations of government sponsored entities, securities issued by states and political subdivisions, corporate securities, and mortgage-backed securities. The Corporations investment securities portfolio serves as a source of earnings and contributes to the management of interest rate risk and liquidity risk.
All of the Corporations securities are classified as available-for-sale. A reduction in the unrealized gain on securities from December 31, 2003 to September 30, 2004, represented $455,000 of the decline in the Corporations total holdings. The fluctuations in the investment portfolio are considered normal and intended to manage the Banks interest rate risk and shortterm liquidity needs. The majority of the securities purchased over the past year have been obligations of government sponsored entities and securities issued by state and political subdivisions with maturities or call features of less than 5 years. The modified duration of the portfolio in years at September 30, 2004 was 2.34, compared to 3.10 at December 31, 2003. Also, see Asset/Liability Gap Position. The following table summarizes the securities available-for-sale held by the Corporation:
Securities available-for-sale | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Amount Pledged | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
September 30, 2004 | $ | 94,588 | $ | 96,023 | $ | 82,532 | |||||
December 31, 2003 | $ | 101,504 | $ | 103,395 | $ | 85,086 |
The majority of the securities are pledged to secure funds borrowed from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other purposes as required or permitted by law. The Bank generally pledges more securities than required to assure that adequate collateral is available to meet the Banks pledging requirements, which change on a daily basis as a result of customer activity in the repurchase product.
-10-
The Banks lending policy is intended to reduce credit risk, enhance earnings and guide the lending officers in making credit decisions. The Board of Directors of the Bank approves the loan authority for each lender and has appointed a Chief Lending Officer who is responsible for the supervision of the lending activities of the Bank. The Bank will be using the services of an independent third party to periodically review the credit quality of the loan portfolio, separate from the loan approval process. These reviews will then be submitted to the Risk Management Officer and to the Audit Committee. Requests to the Bank for credit are considered on the basis of creditworthiness of each applicant, without consideration of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, physical handicap, age, or the receipt of income from public assistance programs. Consideration is given to the applicants capacity for repayment based on cash flow, collateral, capital and alternative sources of repayment. Loan applications are accepted at all the Banks offices and are approved within the limits of each lending officers authority. Loan requests in excess of specific lending officers authority, are required to be presented to the Board of Directors or the Director Loan Committee for review and approval.
Principal lending markets include nearby communities and metropolitan areas of the Banks twelve branches. Subject to established underwriting criteria, the Bank participates with other financial institutions to fund certain large commercial loans, which would exceed the Banks legal lending limit if made solely by the Bank.
September 30, 2004 | December 31, 2003 | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amount | % | Amount | % | |||||||||||
Commercial real estate | $ | 210,400 | 53 | $ | 196,147 | 54 | ||||||||
Residential real estate | 86,890 | 22 | 82,524 | 23 | ||||||||||
Commercial | 69,273 | 18 | 48,866 | 13 | ||||||||||
Consumer | 27,999 | 7 | 36,028 | 10 | ||||||||||
Total loans | $ | 394,562 | 100 | % | $ | 363,565 | 100 | % | ||||||
The Bank has no international loans and there were no concentrations greater than 10% of total loans that are not disclosed as a separate category. The Banks largest concentration of loans is to businesses in the form of commercial loans and real estate mortgages. Management reviews the concentration, and changes in concentrations of loans, using the Standard Industrial Classification (S.I.C.) code. Commercial real estate loans increased $14 million, or 7.3% in the first nine months of this year. Residential real estate loans increased $4 million, or 5.3% in the first nine months of this year. The largest loan growth in the nine months ended September 30, 2004, occurred in the Commercial category, which increased its balances by $20 million or 41.8%. Total consumer loans continue to decline as a result of incentive rate financing provided by the auto industry and the Banks intentional exit from the consumer indirect business. Consumer loans declined $8 million, or 22.3% during the nine months ended September 30, 2004. Expansion of the overall loan portfolio during 2004 has been at an 11.4% annualized rate. This is a trend the Corporation expects to continue with an improving economic climate in West Michigan.
The Banks current practice is to sell residential real estate loans with maturities over 5 years to secondary market buyers. Mortgage servicing rights associated with loans sold are included within other assets. At December 31, 2003 and September 30, 2004, the Bank was servicing loans for secondary market entities totaling approximately $254 million and $251 million, respectively. Mortgage servicing rights, net of reserve of impairment, were valued at approximately $2.1 million at December 31, 2003 and $2.3 million at September 30, 2004.
-11-
September 30, 2004 | December 31, 2003 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non-accrual loans | $ | 1,582 | $ | 466 | ||||
90 days or more past due & still accruing | 112 | 94 | ||||||
Total Non-performing Loans | 1,694 | 560 | ||||||
Other real estate | 242 | 1,539 | ||||||
Total Non-performing Assets | $ | 1,936 | $ | 2,099 | ||||
As a percentage of portfolio loans | ||||||||
Non-performing loans | .43% | .15% | ||||||
Non-performing assets | .49% | .58% | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses | 2.04% | 2.31% | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses as a % of non-performing loans | 476% | 1,498% |
Non-performing assets are comprised of loans for which the accrual of interest has been discontinued, accruing loans 90 days or more past due in payments, collateral for loans and other real estate, which has been acquired primarily through foreclosure and is awaiting disposition. Loans, including loans considered impaired under SFAS No. 118, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of Loan-Income Recognition and Disclosures, are generally placed on a non-accrual basis when principal or interest is past due 90 days or more and when, in the opinion of management, full collection of principal and interest is unlikely.
Total non-accrual loans at September 30, 2004, consisted of five customers, compared to three customers at December 31, 2003. Other real estate consisted of two properties at September 30,2004.
For the Three Months Ended September 30, | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 8,239 | $ | 8,433 | $ | 8,390 | $ | 8,398 | ||||||
Loans charged off | (241 | ) | (237 | ) | (590 | ) | (1,096 | ) | ||||||
Recoveries of loans previously charged off | 56 | 136 | 254 | 505 | ||||||||||
Additions to allowance charged to operations | - | 100 | - | 625 | ||||||||||
Balance at end of period | $ | 8,054 | $ | 8,432 | $ | 8,054 | $ | 8,432 | ||||||
Net loans charged off to average loans | ||||||||||||||
outstanding [annualized] | .19% | .11% | .12% | .22% |
The allowance for loan losses represents the Corporations estimate of probable credit losses related to specifically identified loans as well as probable credit losses inherent in the remainder of the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level believed to be adequate through additions to the provision for loan losses.
Inherent risks and uncertainties related to the operation of a financial institution require management to rely on estimates, appraisals and evaluations of loans to prepare the Corporations financial statements. Changes in economic conditions and the financial prospects of borrowers may result in abrupt changes to the estimates, appraisals or evaluations used. In addition, if actual circumstances and losses differ substantially from managements assumptions and estimates, the allowance for loan losses may not be sufficient to absorb all future losses, and net income could be significantly impacted.
Impaired loans as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 were $11 million and $13 million, respectively. The allowance for loan losses attributable to impaired loans was $1.9 million and $2.6 million as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively.
-12-
The allowance for loan losses is analyzed quarterly by management. In determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, management determines (i) a specific allocation for loans when a loss is probable, (ii) an allocation based on credit risk rating for other adversely rated loans, (iii) an allocation based on historical losses for various categories of loans, and (iv) subjective factors including local and general economic factors and trends. The allowance for loan losses as a percent of total loans reflects managements assessment of a slowly improving economy and labor market.
September 30, 2004 | December 31, 2003 | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Allowance Amount | % of total allowance | Allowance Amount | % of total allowance | |||||||||||
Specific allocations | $ | 1,933 | 24 | % | $ | 2,551 | 30 | % | ||||||
Other adversely rated loans | 1,529 | 19 | 2,143 | 26 | ||||||||||
Historical loss allocations | 1,650 | 20 | 1,457 | 17 | ||||||||||
Allocations based upon subjective factors | 2,942 | 37 | 2,239 | 27 | ||||||||||
Total | $ | 8,054 | 100 | % | $ | 8,390 | 100 | % | ||||||
The allocation of the allowance for loan losses attributed to specific allocations and adversely graded loans declined by 24% from December 2003 to September 30, 2004. Loan grading and collateral reviews are frequently updated as new information becomes available for problem loans. The intentional shrinking of the indirect consumer loan portfolio resulted in a $446,000 decline in the allocation of the allowance necessary for consumer loans from December 31, 2003 to September 30, 2004. Management believes the allowance for loan losses is adequate based on identified risks. Furthermore, management does not expect that it will be necessary to add to the allowance for loan losses, by recording a provision for loan losses, during the next few quarters.
Actual losses experienced in the future, could vary significantly from the estimated allocation of the loan loss reserve. Changes in local and national economic factors could significantly affect the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. While amounts are allocated to various portfolios as directed by SFAS No. 118, the entire allowance for loan losses is available to absorb losses from any portfolio segment.
The following table sets forth the deposit balances and the portfolio mix:
September 30, 2004 | December 31, 2003 | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance | % | Balance | % | |||||||||||
Non-interest bearing demand | $ | 56,711 | 15 | % | $ | 49,814 | 13 | % | ||||||
Interest bearing demand | 96,413 | 26 | 48,285 | 13 | ||||||||||
MMDA/Savings | 79,387 | 21 | 102,911 | 28 | ||||||||||
Time deposits - less than $100,000 | 77,561 | 21 | 92,046 | 25 | ||||||||||
Time deposits - greater than $100,000 | 65,709 | 17 | 78,008 | 21 | ||||||||||
Total Deposits | $ | 375,781 | 100 | % | $ | 371,064 | 100 | % | ||||||
In a campaign to collect local deposits, the rate offered on a high interest plus checking product was increased dramatically during the first quarter of the year 2004. Although the product does not guarantee an interest rate for any period of time, the balance in this product grew from $12 million at December 31, 2003 to $63 million at September 30, 2004. Some internal disintermediation occurred from other depository products to the high interest plus product. The primary reason that deposits only increased $5 million is the intentional decline of deposits over $100,000 and retail time deposits that had been offered at promotional interest rates. Time deposits of less than $100,000 declined $12 million, or 15.8%. The growth of core deposits has enabled the Bank to reduce its reliance on alternative funding sources.
Alternative funding sources such as federal funds, brokered time certificates and FHLB advances supplement the Banks core deposits and are an integral component of the Banks asset/liability management effort. Brokered time certificates declined from $47 million at December 31, 2003, to $38 million at September 30, 2004. FHLB advances declined from $33 at December 31, 2003, to $29 million at September 30, 2004. The Banks ability to borrow additional funds is contingent upon, but not limited to, the availability of funds in the market and the Banks financial condition at the time of each request, as well as its compliance with all applicable collateral requirements, regulations, laws, and Bank policies.
-13-
The Corporation has various financial obligations, including contractual obligations and commitments that may require future cash payments. Management believes that there have been no material changes in the Corporations overall level of these financial obligations since December 31, 2003 and that any changes in the Corporations obligations, which have occurred, are routine for the industry. Further discussion of the nature of each type of obligation is included in Managements Discussion and Analysis on page 27 of the Corporations Form 10K Annual Report, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Net income was $919,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2004, compared to $1,178,000 for the same period in 2003. This is a 22% decrease. The decrease is mainly the attributable to a decline in non-interest income. Non-interest income declined $518,000 or 27% for the three-month period ending September 30, 2004, compared to the same period in 2003. The decline in non-interest income was the result of a $234,000 non-recurring gain recorded in the third quarter of 2003 and a $303,000, or 52% reduction in mortgage banking income. The decline in mortgage banking income is directly related to the slow-down in mortgage refinancing.
Net income was $2,683,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, compared to $2,964,000 for the same period in 2003. The decline is the result of a $1,040,000 decline in net-interest income and a $313,000 decline in non-interest income. This was partially offset by a $625,000 decline in the provision for loan losses and a $279,000 decline in non-interest expenses. The decline in net interest income is the result of continued pressure on the net-interest margin due to low interest rates. However, this trend slowed during the third quarter of 2004 due to increases in the Banks prime rate. The decrease in non-interest income was a result of the slow-down in mortgage refinancing, due to increased mortgage rates, that occurred during 2004. The decline in the provision for loan losses in the result of the Banks improvement in loan quality and the reduction of non-performing assets. The decline in non-interest expenses is the result of a comprehensive review of operating expenses as a part of the Banks initiative to reduce expenses and a reduction in FDIC insurance premiums.
For the Three Months Ended September 30, | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||
Net Income | $ | 919 | $ | 1,178 | $ | 2,683 | $ | 2,964 | ||||||
Basic income per share | $ | 0.45 | $ | 0.58 | $ | 1.32 | $ | 1.46 | ||||||
Diluted income per share | $ | 0.45 | $ | 0.58 | $ | 1.32 | $ | 1.46 | ||||||
Earnings ratios: | ||||||||||||||
Return on average assets | 0.71 | % | 0.91 | % | 0.70 | % | 0.76 | % | ||||||
Return on average equity | 6.55 | % | 8.66 | % | 6.44 | % | 7.44 | % |
-14-
The following schedule presents the average daily balances, interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis (FTE) and interest expense and average rates earned and paid by the Corporation for the periods indicated:
For the Three Months Ended September 30, | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||
Average earning assets | $ | 488,997 | $ | 485,894 | $ | 486,027 | $ | 488,455 | ||||||
Tax equivalent net interest income | 4,205 | 4,217 | 12,194 | 13,226 | ||||||||||
As a percentage of average earning assets: | ||||||||||||||
Tax equivalent interest income | 5.14% | 5.27% | 5.10% | 5.69% | ||||||||||
Interest expense | 2.09% | 2.21% | 2.11% | 2.45% | ||||||||||
Interest spread | 3.05% | 3.06% | 2.98% | 3.24% | ||||||||||
Tax equivalent net interest income | 3.42% | 3.44% | 3.35% | 3.62% | ||||||||||
Average earning assets as a percentage of | ||||||||||||||
average assets | 94.6% | 94.8% | 94.5% | 93.3% |
Net interest income is the principal source of income for the Corporation. Net interest income is the difference between the interest earned on loans and investments and the interest paid on deposits and borrowed funds. The tax equivalent net interest income remained flat for the three-month period ended September 30, 2004, compared to the same period in 2003. The Corporations spread on interest rates remains compressed as market interest rates have remained low and competitive pressures within our geographic market have also contributed to the reduced margin, but the Bank is beginning to see margin improvements. Tax equivalent net interest income increased from 3.31% for the second quarter of 2004 to 3.42% for the third quarter of 2004. Management expects net interest income to continue to improve during the remainder of 2004, aided by recent increases in short-term interest rates.
The provision for loan losses charged to earnings was $0 for the both the three-month period ended September 30, 2004 and the nine-month period ended September 30, 2004, compared to $100,000 and $625,000 for the same periods in 2003, respectively. Based upon Managements assessment of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, a charge to the provision for loan losses was not necessary during the first nine months of 2004. This was mainly the result of the increase in the overall credit quality of the Banks loan portfolios. Furthermore, it is unlikely that a charge to the provision for loan losses will be required for the remainder of 2004.
Management took significant steps to improve underwriting standards and administration of the loan portfolios in the prior year. An intentional decision was made to exit the indirect consumer loan business, which Management believes to have an inherently higher risk than the Banks other loan portfolios. Management is optimistic about recent economic trends and their respective impact upon the loan portfolios.
Non-interest income consists of service charges on deposit accounts, insurance fees, brokerage fees, gains or losses on the sales of investments, gains from the sales of mortgage loans and servicing fees on the loans sold with the servicing rights retained. The majority of the mortgage loans the Bank originates are sold to secondary market buyers.
Service charge income on deposit accounts increased by $91,000, or 16% for the three months ended September 30, 2004, when compared to the same time period of 2003. The rise in service fee income is mostly attributable to increases in overdraft fees on checking accounts and electronic banking income, due to increases in volume. Mortgage banking income declined $303,000, or 52% for the three months ended September 30, 2004, compared to the same period in 2003. The decline in mortgage banking revenue is due to a decline in the number of mortgage originations. Mortgage originations during the remainder of 2004 are expected to be lower than the same period a year ago. Net gain on sales of available for sale securities increased $24,000, or 900% for the third quarter of 2004, compared to the third quarter of 2003. This was the result of the sale of some investments that no longer matched the goals and strategies of the Corporation. Income from insurance premiums and brokerage fees declined $57,000, or 15% for the three months ended September 30, 2004, compared to the same period in 2003. Other non-interest income declined $270,000, or 74% in the third quarter of 2004, compared to the same period in 2003. This is mainly the result of a $234,000 non-recurring gain that was recorded in the third quarter of 2003.
-15-
Total non- interest income declined $313,000 for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2004, compared to the same period in 2003. The decline is mainly attributable to a $447,000 decline in mortgage banking income, a $93,000 decline in income from insurance premiums and brokerage fees and a $230,000 decline in other non-interest income. These declines were somewhat offset by a $228,000 increase in service charges on deposits and a $229,000 increase in the net gain on the sale of available for sale securities. The decline in mortgage banking income is directly related to the decline in mortgage originations. The decline in insurance premiums and brokerage fees is mainly the result of reduced annual income pass-through from the insurance underwriters, which is based on the loss rate of the Dornbush Insurance Agency policyholders. The decline in other non-interest income was the result of a non-recurring gain that was booked during the third quarter of 2003. The increase in service charges on deposits is mainly the result of increases in overdraft fees on checking accounts and electronic banking fees. The increase in the gain on the sale of available for sale securities is mainly attributable to equity securities, which no longer fit the long-term direction of the Corporation, that were sold for a gain of $205,000 in the second quarter of 2004.
Non-interest expense declined slightly for the three-month period ended September 30, 2004, compared to the same period in 2003. During a comprehensive review of operating expenses it was determined that the Corporations staff levels required adjustment. Although severance and outplacement costs were recorded in the third quarter related to the reduction in staff, total salary expense remained even with a year ago. Total benefit expense increased 21% as a result of the continued escalating cost of providing employee health care, which increased 79% in the third quarter of 2004, compared to the third quarter of 2003. Occupancy and equipment cost rose modestly and total other expense declined $140,000, or 13% during the third quarter of 2004 as the benefits of on-going cost reduction efforts continue to be realized.
Non-interest expense declined slightly for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2004, compared to the same period in 2003. The decline was mostly the result of a decline in other non-interest expenses and was somewhat offset by increases in salaries and employee benefits. The decline in other non-interest expense reflects FDIC insurance premiums that are 90% lower than a year ago as well as the continued initiative to reduce expense. The decline in FDIC insurance premiums is a result of the Corporation being released from the written agreement that was in place for most of 2003. The increase in salary expense is mainly due to higher staffing levels. The increase in employee benefits expense is the result of the continued escalating cost of providing employee health care. Health care costs have risen 56% over the prior year.
The provision for income taxes was $331,000, which equates to an effective tax rate of 26% for the three-month period ended September 30, 2004, compared to $466,000, which equates to an effective tax rate of 28%, for the same period in 2003. The provision for federal income taxes was $965,000, which equates to an effective tax rate of 26% for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2004, compared to $1,133,000, which equates to an effective tax rate of 28%, for the same period in 2003.
The difference between the Corporations effective tax rate and statutory tax rate is largely due to the percentage of total income that is derived from investment interest income that is exempt from federal taxation. The Corporation does not expect significant fluctuations in the effective tax rate for the remainder of this year.
The majority of assets and liabilities of financial institutions are monetary in nature. Generally, changes in interest rates have a more significant impact on earnings of the Corporation than inflation. Although influenced by inflation, changes in rates do not necessarily move in either the same magnitude or direction as changes in the price of goods and services. Inflation does impact the growth of total assets, creating a need to increase equity capital at a higher rate to maintain an adequate equity to assets ratio, which in turn reduces the amount of earnings available for cash dividends.
-16-
The capital of the Corporation consists of common stock, additional paid-in capital, retained earnings and accumulated other comprehensive income. Total stockholders equity increased $1,469,000, from December 31, 2003, to September 30, 2004; this represents a change of 3%. The change in securities valuation caused a $301,000 decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income, from December 31, 2003 to September 30, 2004.
A quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share was paid to the shareholders during the third quarter of 2004.
Management regularly reviews the capital level of the Bank and the Corporation. Management believes that the current level of capital is adequate for current and projected needs at both the Bank and Corporation.
Under the regulatory risk-based capital guidelines in effect for both banks and bank holding companies, minimum capital levels are based upon perceived risk in the Corporations various asset categories. These guidelines assign risk weights to on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet categories in arriving at total risk-adjusted assets. Regulatory capital is divided by the computed total of risk adjusted assets to arrive at the minimum levels prescribed by the Federal Reserve Board at September 30, 2004 as shown in the table below:
Regulatory Requirements | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adequately Capitalized | Well Capitalized | September 30, 2004 | December 31, 2003 | |||||||||||
Tier 1 capital | $ | 55,279 | $ | 53,338 | ||||||||||
Tier 2 capital | 5,448 | 5,036 | ||||||||||||
Total regulatory capital | $ | 60,727 | $ | 58,374 | ||||||||||
Ratio of capital to total assets | ||||||||||||||
Tier 1 leverage ratio | 4% | 5% | 10.69% | 10.56% | ||||||||||
Tier 1 risk-based capital | 4% | 6% | 12.76% | 13.47% | ||||||||||
Total risk-based capital | 8% | 10% | 14.02% | 14.74% |
Liquidity is measured by the Corporations ability to raise funds through deposits, borrowed funds, infusion of capital, or cash flow from the repayment of loans and investment securities. These funds are used to meet deposit withdrawals, maintain reserve requirements, fund loans and operate our Corporation. Liquidity is primarily achieved through the growth of deposits and liquid assets such as securities available for sale, matured securities, and federal funds sold. Asset and liability management, which is a significant responsibility of the Asset and Liability Management Committee (ALCO), is the process of managing the balance sheet to achieve a mix of earning assets and liabilities that maximizes profitability, while providing adequate liquidity.
The Corporations liquidity strategy is to fund loan growth with deposits, and borrowed funds as needed. During the nine month period ended September 30, 2004, total portfolio loans increased $31 million, which was funded in part by liquidating $7 million of federal funds sold and liquidating $7 million of securities available for sale. Additional funding was provided by a $5 million increase in deposits. Management expects to be in a federal funds purchased position by the end of 2004 and has established a target level for federal funds purchased of $10 million. At September 30, 2004 the Bank had available and unused federal funds lines of credit totaling $50 million from various correspondent banks.
Management anticipates that future loan growth will exceed the ability to grow deposits and will likely utilize brokered certificates of deposit and FHLB advances to provide funding for loan growth.
-17-
Cash and cash equivalents declined by $3 million from December 31, 2003 to September 30, 2004. This decline reflects the loan growth and funding strategy discussed above. The current level of cash and cash equivalents is deemed to be near optimal, and as a result, is not expected to change significantly from the this level.
Market risk is the potential for losses in the fair value of the Corporations assets and liabilities due to changes in interest rates, exchange rates and security pricing. The Corporations exposure to market risk is reviewed on a regular basis by the ALCO. Interest rate risk represents the Corporations primary component of market risk. Interest rate risk is the potential of economic losses due to future interest rate changes. These economic losses can be reflected as a loss of future net interest income and/or a loss of current fair market values. Tools used by management include an interest modeling and simulation model. The objective is to measure the effect on net interest income and to adjust the balance sheet to manage the inherent risk while at the same time maximize income. Management realizes certain risks are inherent and that the goal is to identify and minimize these risks.
Simulation Model
Simulations models require numerous assumptions that have a significant impact on the measured interest rate risk. Simulation models attempt to predict customer reaction to interest rate changes, changes in the competitive environment, and other economic factors. In running our Interest Rate Scenario Analysis (IRSA) simulation model, we first forecast the next twelve months of net interest income under an assumed environment of constant market interest rates. Next, immediate and parallel interest rate shocks are constructed in the model. These rate shocks reflect changes of equal magnitude to all market interest rates. The next twelve months of net interest income are then forecast under each of the rate shock scenarios. The resulting change in net interest income is an indication of the sensitivity of our earnings to directional changes in market interest rates. The IRSA model is based solely on parallel changes in market rates and does not reflect the levels of interest rate risk that may arise from other factors such as changes in the spreads between key market rates or in the shape of the Treasury yield curve. The net interest income sensitivity is monitored by the ALCO, which evaluates the results in conjunction with acceptable interest rate risk parameters. The simulation also measures the change in the Economic Value of Equity. This represents the change in the net present value of the Corporations assets and liabilities under the same parallel shifts in interest rates, as calculated by discounting the estimated future cash flows using a market-based discount rate. Cash flow estimates incorporate anticipated changes in prepayment speeds of loans and securities. The following table shows the suggested impact on net interest income over the next twelve months, and the Economic Value of Equity based on the Corporations balance sheet as of September 30, 2004.
Change in Interest Rates | Market Value of Portfolio Equity(1) | Percent Change | Net Interest Income(2) | Percent Change | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
300 basis point rise | $ | 37,367 | (-27.8%) | $ | 20,347 | 14.7% | ||||||||
200 basis point rise | 42,257 | (18.4%) | 19,487 | 9.9% | ||||||||||
100 basis point rise | 47,055 | (9.1%) | 18,618 | 5.0% | ||||||||||
Base rate | 51,768 | - | 17,736 | - | ||||||||||
100 basis point decline | 55,606 | 7.4% | 16,758 | (5.5%) | ||||||||||
200 basis point decline | 58,989 | 13.9% | 15,070 | (15.0%) | ||||||||||
300 basis point decline | 62,666 | 21.1% | 12,294 | (30.7%) |
(1) | Simulation analyses calculate the change in the net present value of the Corporations assets and liabilities, under parallel shifts in interest rates, by discounting the estimated future cash flows. |
(2) | Simulation analyses calculate the change in net interest income, under parallel shifts in interest rates over the next 12 months, based on a static balance sheet. |
-18-
(a) | Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Corporations Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of the Corporations disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q Quarterly Report, have concluded that the Corporations disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and effective to ensure that material information relating to the Corporation would be made known to them by others within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which this Form 10-Quarterly Report was being prepared. |
(b) | Changes in Internal Controls. During the period covered by this report, there have been no changes in the Corporations internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Corporations internal control over financial reporting. |
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings None |
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds None |
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities None |
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders None |
Item 5. | Other Information None |
Item 6. | Exhibits and Reports on 8-K |
(a) | Exhibits |
31.1 | Certificate of the President and Chief Executive Officer of OAK Financial Corporation pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31.2 | Certificate of the Chief Financial Officer of OAK Financial Corporation pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.1 | Certificate of the Chief Executive Officer of OAK Financial Corporation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.2 | Certificate of the Chief Financial Officer of OAK Financial Corporation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
-19-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
OAK FINANCIAL CORPORATION /s/ Patrick K. Gill Patrick K. Gill (Chief Executive Officer) /s/ James A. Luyk James A. Luyk (Chief Financial Officer) |
Date: November 9, 2004
-20-
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit | Description |
31.1 | Certificate of the President and Chief Executive Officer of OAK Financial Corporation pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31.2 | Certificate of the Chief Financial Officer of OAK Financial Corporation pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.1 | Certificate of the Chief Executive Officer of OAK Financial Corporation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31.2 | Certificate of the Chief Financial Officer of OAK Financial Corporation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
-21-
I, Patrick K. Gill, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of OAK Financial Corporation; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. | The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: |
(a) | designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
(b) | evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
(c) | disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. | The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
(a) | all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
(b) | any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting; |
Dated: November 9, 2004
/s/ Patrick K. Gill Patrick K. Gill President and Chief Executive Officer |
-22-
I, James A. Luyk, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of OAK Financial Corporation; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. | The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: |
(a) | designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
(b) | evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
(c) | disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. | The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
(a) | all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
(b) | any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting; |
Dated: November 9, 2004
/s/ James A. Luyk James A. Luyk Chief Financial Officer |
-23-
I, Patrick K. Gill, Chief Executive Officer of OAK Financial Corporation certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
(2) the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OAK Financial Corporation.
Dated: November 9, 2004
/s/ Patrick K. Gill Patrick K. Gill Chief Executive Officer |
24
I, James A. Luyk, Chief Financial Officer of OAK Financial Corporation certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
(2) the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OAK Financial Corporation.
Dated: November 9, 2004
/s/ James A. Luyk James A. Luyk Chief Financial Officer |
-25-