_________________
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _______ to ________
Commission file number 000-22461
OAK FINANCIAL
CORPORATION
(Exact name of
registrant as specified in its charter)
MICHIGAN (State of other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
38-2817345 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
2445 84th Street,
S.W., Byron Center, Michigan 49315
(Address
of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (616) 878-1591
_________________
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X] No [__].
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).
Yes [X] No [__].
The number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 2,035,191 shares of the Corporations Common Stock ($1 par value) were outstanding as of August 9, 2004.
Part I. Financial Information (unaudited): | Page Number(s) | ||||
Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements | 3 - 6 | ||||
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | 7 - 9 | ||||
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of | |||||
Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 9 - 17 | ||||
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 17 - 18 | ||||
Item 4. Controls and Procedures | 18 | ||||
Part II. Other Information | |||||
Item 1. Legal Proceedings | 19 | ||||
Item 2. Changes in Securities, Use of Proceeds, and Issuer Purchase of Equity Securities | 19 | ||||
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities | 19 | ||||
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | 19 | ||||
Item 5. Other Information | 19 | ||||
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K | 19 | ||||
Signatures | 20 | ||||
Exhibit Index | 21 |
-2-
OAK FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY |
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS |
(in thousands) |
June 30, 2004 (Unaudited) | December 31, 2003 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASSETS | ||||||||
Cash and due from banks | $ | 12,783 | $ | 12,431 | ||||
Federal funds sold | - | 7,100 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 12,783 | 19,531 | ||||||
Available-for-sale securities | 99,714 | 103,395 | ||||||
Loans held for sale | 617 | 1,705 | ||||||
Portfolio loans | 383,142 | 363,565 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses | (8,239 | ) | (8,390 | ) | ||||
Net Loans | 374,903 | 355,175 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable | 2,271 | 2,266 | ||||||
Premises and equipment, net | 14,161 | 14,428 | ||||||
Restricted investments | 3,027 | 2,977 | ||||||
Other assets | 9,318 | 9,056 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 516,794 | $ | 508,533 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||||||
Deposits | ||||||||
Non-interest bearing | $ | 57,041 | $ | 49,814 | ||||
Interest bearing | 317,218 | 321,250 | ||||||
Total deposits | 374,259 | 371,064 | ||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase | ||||||||
and federal funds purchased | 51,741 | 44,338 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) Advances | 31,000 | 33,000 | ||||||
Borrowed funds | 1,643 | 1,491 | ||||||
Other liabilities | 2,945 | 3,560 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 461,588 | 453,453 | ||||||
Stockholders' equity | ||||||||
Common stock, $1 par value; 4,000,000 shares authorized; | ||||||||
2,035,191 shares issued and outstanding | 2,035 | 2,035 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 6,023 | 6,023 | ||||||
Retained earnings | 46,938 | 45,774 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income | 210 | 1,248 | ||||||
Total stockholders' equity | 55,206 | 55,080 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ | 516,794 | $ | 508,533 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
-3-
OAK FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME |
(Dollars in thousands except per share data) | Three and Six Months ended June 30, (Unaudited) |
Interest Income | Three Months | Six Months | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||
Interest and fees on loans | $ | 5,137 | $ | 6,050 | $ | 10,193 | $ | 12,199 | ||||||
Available-for-sale securities | 819 | 812 | 1,697 | 1,673 | ||||||||||
Restricted investments | 35 | 41 | 75 | 82 | ||||||||||
Other | 2 | 78 | 24 | 159 | ||||||||||
Total interest income | 5,993 | 6,981 | 11,989 | 14,113 | ||||||||||
Interest expense | ||||||||||||||
Deposits | 1,587 | 1,990 | 3,200 | 4,155 | ||||||||||
Borrowed funds | 440 | 441 | 876 | 886 | ||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase | 76 | 131 | 165 | 291 | ||||||||||
Total interest expense | 2,103 | 2,562 | 4,241 | 5,332 | ||||||||||
Net interest income | 3,890 | 4,419 | 7,748 | 8,781 | ||||||||||
Provision for loan losses | - | - | - | 525 | ||||||||||
Net interest income after provision | 3,890 | 4,419 | 7,748 | 8,256 | ||||||||||
Non-interest income | ||||||||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts | 640 | 544 | 1,173 | 1,036 | ||||||||||
Net gain on sales of loans held for sale | 334 | 932 | 649 | 1,589 | ||||||||||
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights | (215 | ) | (639 | ) | (385 | ) | (1,037 | ) | ||||||
Recovery / (impairment) of servicing rights | 86 | - | 86 | (75 | ) | |||||||||
Loan servicing fees | 167 | 143 | 347 | 299 | ||||||||||
Net gain on sales of available for sale securities | 201 | 1 | 206 | 1 | ||||||||||
Insurance premiums | 305 | 274 | 588 | 679 | ||||||||||
Brokerage fees | 90 | 97 | 196 | 141 | ||||||||||
Other | 99 | 163 | 199 | 221 | ||||||||||
Total non-interest income | 1,707 | 1,515 | 3,059 | 2,854 | ||||||||||
Non-interest expenses | ||||||||||||||
Salaries | 2,055 | 1,986 | 4,200 | 3,831 | ||||||||||
Employee benefits | 500 | 425 | 1,078 | 1,009 | ||||||||||
Occupancy (net) | 323 | 335 | 655 | 637 | ||||||||||
Furniture and fixtures | 279 | 286 | 551 | 557 | ||||||||||
Other | 1,136 | 1,340 | 1,925 | 2,623 | ||||||||||
Total non-interest expenses | 4,293 | 4,372 | 8,409 | 8,657 | ||||||||||
Income before federal income taxes | 1,304 | 1,562 | 2,398 | 2,453 | ||||||||||
Federal income taxes | 352 | 447 | 634 | 667 | ||||||||||
Net income | $ | 952 | $ | 1,115 | $ | 1,764 | $ | 1,786 | ||||||
Income per common share: | ||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.47 | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.87 | $ | 0.88 | ||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.47 | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.87 | $ | 0.88 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
-4-
OAK FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
(in thousands) | Six Months ended June 30, (Unaudited) |
2004 | 2003 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance, beginning of year | $ | 55,080 | $ | 52,606 | ||||
Net income | 1,764 | 1,786 | ||||||
Net change in accumulated other comprehensive income | (1,038 | ) | 13 | |||||
Dividends paid | (600 | ) | (490 | ) | ||||
Allocation of Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) shares | 37 | |||||||
Balance, end of period | $ | 55,206 | $ | 53,952 | ||||
OAK FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
(in thousands) | Three and Six Months ended June 30, (Unaudited) |
Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||
Net income | $ | 952 | $ | 1,115 | $ | 1,764 | $ | 1,786 | ||||||
Change in unrealized gain/(loss) on securities, net of tax | (1,484 | ) | 497 | (1,038 | ) | 13 | ||||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | (532 | ) | $ | 1,612 | $ | 726 | $ | 1,799 | |||||
-5-
OAK FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS |
(in thousands) | Six Months ended June 30, (Unaudited) |
2004 | 2003 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash flows from operating activities | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 1,764 | $ | 1,786 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net | ||||||||
cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 585 | 556 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses | - | 525 | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale | 42,680 | 86,663 | ||||||
Originations of loans held for sale | (41,258 | ) | (90,054 | ) | ||||
Net gain on sales of available-for-sale securities | (206 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||
Net gain on sales of loans held for sale | (334 | ) | (1,589 | ) | ||||
Net amortization of investment premiums | 544 | 379 | ||||||
(Gain) / Loss on sales of property and equipment | (24 | ) | 6 | |||||
Deferred federal income tax benefit | 332 | 23 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities which (used) provided cash: | ||||||||
Accrued interest receivable | (5 | ) | 436 | |||||
Other assets | (701 | ) | (2,361 | ) | ||||
Other liabilities | 28 | (208 | ) | |||||
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities | 3,405 | (3,839 | ) | |||||
Cash flows from investing activities | ||||||||
Available-for-sale securities | ||||||||
Proceeds from calls, maturities and paydowns | 9,914 | 9,786 | ||||||
Proceeds from sales | 3,407 | - | ||||||
Purchases | (11,552 | ) | (22,470 | ) | ||||
Purchases of restricted investments | (50 | ) | (27 | ) | ||||
Net decrease (increase) in loans held for investment | (19,728 | ) | 31,338 | |||||
Purchases of premises and equipment | (331 | ) | (177 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from the sale of premises and equipment | 37 | 2 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used) in investing activities | (18,303 | ) | 18,452 | |||||
Cash flows from financing activities | ||||||||
Net (decrease) increase in deposits | 3,195 | (11,198 | ) | |||||
Net increase in TT&L note | 152 | - | ||||||
Net borrowed funds (repayments) | 9,500 | (1,000 | ) | |||||
Dividends paid | (600 | ) | (490 | ) | ||||
Net decrease in securities sold under | ||||||||
agreements to repurchase | (4,097 | ) | (5,555 | ) | ||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | 8,150 | (18,243 | ) | |||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (6,748 | ) | (3,630 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 19,531 | 57,004 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 12,783 | $ | 53,374 | ||||
Supplementary cash flows information | ||||||||
Interest paid | $ | 4,357 | $ | 5,612 | ||||
Income taxes paid | $ | 170 | $ | 350 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
-6-
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions of Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the year-to-date and three-month periods ended June 30, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2004. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Corporations annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
All earnings per share amounts have been presented to conform to the requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 128, Earnings Per Share. Basic earnings per share exclude any dilutive effect of stock options. The basic earnings per share for the Corporation is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share for the Corporation is computed by dividing net income by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the dilutive effect of outstanding stock options. Dilutive shares in 2004 round to zero. There were no dilutive shares during the year 2003. The following table summarizes the number of shares used in the denominator of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations:
Three Months ended June 30, | Six Months ended June 30, | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||
Average shares outstanding | 2,035 | 2,041 | 2,035 | 2,041 | ||||||||||
Average ESOP shares not committed to be released | - | (6 | ) | - | (6 | ) | ||||||||
Shares outstanding for basic earnings per share | 2,035 | 2,035 | 2,035 | 2,035 | ||||||||||
Dilutive shares from stock option plans | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||
Shares for dilutive earnings per share | 2,035 | 2,035 | 2,035 | 2,035 | ||||||||||
The Corporation provides a broad range of financial products and services through its branch network in West Michigan. While the Corporations chief decision makers monitor the revenue streams of various products and services, operations are managed and financial performance is evaluated on a corporate wide basis. Accordingly, all of the Corporations operations are aggregated in one reportable operating segment.
OAK ELC is an employee leasing company that leases employees to Byron Center State Bank, OAK Financial Services and Dornbush Insurance Agency. The purpose of OAK ELC is to reduce the administrative burden of multiple payrolls, minimize the payroll tax reporting burden, and allocate shared employment costs between business units. The financial results of OAK ELC and elimination of inter-company transactions are included in the consolidated results of the Corporation.
The allowance for loan losses is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of the loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.
The allowance for loan losses is evaluated frequently by management and is based upon a periodic review of the collectibility of the loans in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrowers ability to repay, estimated value of underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.
-7-
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Corporation will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due, according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrowers prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on an individual loan basis for commercial and construction loans by either: the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the loans effective interest rate; the loans obtainable market price; or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.
The primary components of the balance sheet are interest-earning assets, which are funded by interest-bearing liabilities. The differences in cash flows of these rate sensitive assets and liabilities, combined with shifts, or changes in the overall market yield curve result in interest rate risk. Interest rate risk is the change in net interest income due to interest rate changes. Interest rate risk is inherent to banking and cannot be eliminated.
The Asset and Liability Management Committee (ALCO) is responsible for overseeing the financial management of net interest income, liquidity, investment transactions, and other related activities. To address interest rate risk, management utilizes simulation analysis to assess risk in dynamic interest rate environments.
Note 7 Stock Compensation and Stock Option Plans (dollars in thousands, except per share data)
The Corporation maintains stock option plans for non-employee directors (the Directors Plan) and employees and officers of the Corporation and its subsidiary (the Employees Plan). The stock compensation plans were established in 1999, and authorize the issue of up to 165,000 options under the Employees Plan and up to 35,000 options under the Directors Plan.
Options under both plans become exercisable after the first anniversary of the award date. The option exercise price is at least 100% of the market value of the common stock at the grant date. During 2004, 1,000 options were awarded at an exercise price of $45.00. No options were awarded in the year 2003. The following tables summarize information about stock option transactions:
June 30, 2004 | June 30, 2003 | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shares | Average Option Price | Shares | Average Option Price | |||||||||||
Outstanding, beginning of period | 37,130 | $ | 49.35 | 44,130 | $ | 49.62 | ||||||||
Granted | 1,000 | 45.00 | - | - | ||||||||||
Exercised | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||
Forfeited/expired | (7,164 | ) | 49.78 | (7,000 | ) | 51.04 | ||||||||
Outstanding, end of period | 30,966 | $ | 49.11 | 37,130 | $ | 49.35 | ||||||||
Exercisable, end of period | 29,966 | $ | 49.25 | 35,130 | $ | 49.63 | ||||||||
Outstanding | Exercisable | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Exercise Price | Number June 30, 2004 | Wgt. Avg. Remaining Contractual Life | Number June 30, 2004 | ||||||||
$44.50 | 10,032 | 7.6 years | 10,032 | ||||||||
$45.00 | 1,000 | 9.8 years | - | ||||||||
$50.00 | 13,402 | 5.8 years | 13,402 | ||||||||
$55.00 | 6,532 | 5.5 years | 6,532 | ||||||||
Total | 30,966 | 6.4 years | 29,966 | ||||||||
-8-
All options expire 10 years after the date of the grant; 143,277 shares are reserved for future issuance under the Employees Plan and 25,000 shares are reserved for future issuance under the Directors Plan.
SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, encourages all entities to adopt a fair value based method of accounting for stock compensation plans, whereby compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is recognized over the service period, which is usually the vesting period.
Had compensation costs for the Corporations stock option plans been determined based on fair value at the grant dates for awards under the plans consistent with the method prescribed by FASB 123, the Corporations net income and earnings per share would have been adjusted to the pro forma amounts indicated below:
Three Months ended June 30, | Six Months ended June 30, | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||
Net Income as reported | $ | 952 | $ | 1,115 | $ | 1,764 | $ | 1,786 | ||||||
Stock based compensation credit (expense) determined | ||||||||||||||
under fair value method, net of related tax effect | (1 | ) | - | (1 | ) | (12 | ) | |||||||
Pro-forma net income | $ | 951 | $ | 1,115 | $ | 1,763 | $ | 1,774 | ||||||
Basic earnings per share as reported | $ | 0.47 | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.87 | $ | 0.88 | ||||||
Pro-forma basic earnings per share as reported | $ | 0.47 | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.87 | $ | 0.87 | ||||||
Diluted earnings per share as reported | $ | 0.47 | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.87 | $ | 0.88 | ||||||
Pro-forma diluted earnings per share as reported | $ | 0.47 | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.87 | $ | 0.87 |
This report includes forward-looking statements as that term is used in the securities laws. All statements regarding our expected financial position, business and strategies are forward-looking statements. In addition, the words anticipates, believes, estimates, seeks, expects, plans, intends, and similar expressions, as they relate to us or our management, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The presentation and discussion of the provision and allowance for loan losses and statements concerning future profitability or future growth or increases, are examples of inherently forward looking statements in that they involve judgments and statements of belief as to the outcome of future events. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse affect on our operations and our future prospects include, but are not limited to, changes in: interest rates, general economic conditions, legislative/regulatory changes, monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. Government, including policies of the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve Board, the quality or composition of the loan or investment portfolios, demand for loan products, deposit flows, competition, demand for financial services in our market area and accounting principles, policies and guidelines. These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Further information concerning us and our business, including additional factors that could materially affect our financial results, has been included within our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
OAK Financial Corporation (the Corporation) is a single bank holding company, which owns OAK ELC (which is discussed above under Special Purpose Entities), and Byron Center State Bank (the Bank). The Bank has twelve banking offices serving communities in Kent, Ottawa and Allegan Counties. The Bank owns a subsidiary, OAK Financial Services. OAK Financial Services offers mutual fund products, securities brokerage services, retirement planning services, investment management and advisory services. OAK Financial Services owns Dornbush Insurance Agency, which sells property / casualty, life, disability and long-term health care insurance products.
-9-
The following is managements discussion and analysis of the factors that influenced OAK Financial Corporations financial performance. The discussion should be read in conjunction with the Corporations 2003 annual report on Form 10-K and the audited financial statements and notes contained therein.
The Corporations consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and follow general practices within the banking and other industries in which it operates. Certain of the Corporations accounting policies are important to the portrayal of the Corporations financial condition, since they require management to make difficult, complex or subjective judgments, some of which may relate to matters that are inherently uncertain. Estimates associated with these policies are susceptible to material changes as a result of changes in facts and circumstances. Facts and circumstances which could affect these judgments include, but without limitation, changes in interest rate, in local and national economic conditions, or the financial condition of borrowers. The Corporations accounting policies are discussed in detail in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on pages 35 through 38 in the Corporations Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (10-K Report). Management believes that its most significant accounting policies include determining the allowance for loan losses, assessing the risk of individual loans and the risk of the overall commercial loan portfolio and the valuation of mortgage servicing rights. These are discussed on page 10 of the 10-K Report.
Total assets increased by $8.3 million, or 1.62% from December 31, 2003 to June 30, 2004. The significant changes include a decline in cash and cash equivalents of $6.7 million, a decrease in securities available for sale of $3.7 million and an increase in net loans receivable of $19.7 million.
Correspondingly, total liabilities grew for the six months ended June 30, 2004. There was an increase of total deposits of $3.2 million, a decrease in repurchase agreements of $4 million, a decrease in FHLB Advances of $2 million and a borrowing of federal funds of $11.5 million at June 30, 2004.
The Corporation maintains a diversified securities portfolio, which includes obligations of government sponsored entities, securities issued by states and political subdivisions, corporate securities, and mortgage-backed securities. The Corporations investment securities portfolio serves as a source of earnings and contributes to the management of interest rate risk and liquidity risk.
All of the Corporations securities are classified as available-for-sale. A reduction in the fair value of securities from December 31, 2003 to June 30, 2004, represented $1.6 million of the decline Corporations total holdings. The fluctuations in the investment portfolio are considered normal and intended to manage the Banks interest rate risk and shortterm liquidity needs. The majority of the securities purchased over the past year have been obligations of government sponsored entities and securities issued by state and political subdivisions with maturities or call features of less than 5 years. The modified duration of the portfolio in years at June 30, 2004 was 2.87, compared to 3.10 at December 31, 2003. Also, see Asset/Liability Gap Position.
Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Amount Pledged | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Securities available-for-sale June 30, 2004 |
$ | 99,398 | $ | 99,714 | $ | 76,197 | |||||
December 31, 2003 | $ | 101,504 | $ | 103,395 | $ | 85,086 |
The majority of the securities are pledged to secure funds borrowed from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other purposes as required or permitted by law. The Bank generally pledges more securities than required to assure that adequate collateral is available to meet the Banks pledging requirements, which change on a daily basis as a result of customer activity in the repurchase product.
-10-
The Banks lending policy is intended to reduce credit risk, enhance earnings and guide the lending officers in making credit decisions. The Board of Directors of the Bank approves the loan authority for each lender and has appointed a Chief Lending Officer who is responsible for the supervision of the lending activities of the Bank. The Board has also appointed a loan review officer who monitors the credit quality of the loan portfolio independent of the loan approval process. The loan review officer submits periodic reviews to the Risk Management Officer and these reviews are submitted to the Audit Committee on a quarterly basis. Requests to the Bank for credit are considered on the basis of creditworthiness of each applicant, without consideration of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, physical handicap, age, or the receipt of income from public assistance programs. Consideration is given to the applicants capacity for repayment based on cash flow, collateral, capital and alternative sources of repayment. Loan applications are accepted at all the Banks offices and are approved within the limits of each lending officers authority. Loan requests in excess of specific lending officers authority, are required to be presented to the Board of Directors or the Director Loan Committee for review and approval.
Principal lending markets include nearby communities and metropolitan areas of the Banks twelve branches. Subject to established underwriting criteria, the Bank participates with other financial institutions to fund certain large commercial loans, which would exceed the Banks legal lending limit if made solely by the Bank.
June 30, 2004 | December 31, 2003 | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amount | % | Amount | % | |||||||||||
Commercial real estate | $ | 205,907 | 54 | $ | 196,147 | 54 | ||||||||
Residential real estate | 85,695 | 22 | 82,524 | 23 | ||||||||||
Commercial | 61,872 | 16 | 48,866 | 13 | ||||||||||
Consumer | 29,668 | 8 | 36,028 | 10 | ||||||||||
Total loans | $ | 383,142 | 100 | % | $ | 363,565 | 100 | % | ||||||
The Bank has no international loans and there were no concentrations greater than 10% of total loans that are not disclosed as a separate category. The Banks largest concentration of loans is to businesses in the form of commercial loans and real estate mortgages. Management reviews the concentration, and changes in concentrations of loans, using the Standard Industrial Classification (S.I.C.) code. Commercial real estate loans increased $9.8 million in the first six months of this year. The largest loan growth in the past six months ended June 30, 2004, has occurred in the Commercial category; which increased its balances by $13 million or 27%. Total consumer loans continue to decline as a result of incentive rate financing provided by the auto industry and the Banks intentional exit from the consumer indirect business. Expansion of the overall loan portfolio during the 2004 year is at a 10.8% annualized rate. This is a trend the Corporation expects to continue with an improving economic climate in West Michigan.
The Banks current practice is to sell residential real estate loans with maturities over 5 years to secondary market buyers. Mortgage servicing rights associated with loans sold are included within other assets. At December 31, 2003 and June 30, 2004, the Bank was servicing loans for secondary market entities totaling approximately $254 million and $255 million, respectively. Mortgage servicing rights were approximately $2.1 million at December 31, 2003 and $ 2.4 million at June 30, 2004.
-11-
June 30, 2004 | December 31, 2003 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non-accrual loans | $ | 2,254 | $ | 466 | ||||
90 days or more past due & still accruing | 65 | 94 | ||||||
Total Non-performing Loans | 2,319 | 560 | ||||||
Other real estate | 1,006 | 1,539 | ||||||
Total Non-performing Assets | $ | 3,325 | $ | 2,099 | ||||
As a percentage of portfolio loans | ||||||||
Non-performing loans | .61% | .15% | ||||||
Non-performing assets | .87% | .58% | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses | 2.15% | 2.31% | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses as a % of non-performing loans | 355% | 1,498% |
Non-performing assets are comprised of loans for which the accrual of interest has been discontinued, accruing loans 90 days or more past due in payments, collateral for loans and other real estate, which has been acquired primarily through foreclosure and is awaiting disposition. Loans, including loans considered impaired under SFAS No. 118, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan-Income Recognition and Disclosures, are generally placed on a non-accrual basis when principal or interest is past due 90 days or more and when, in the opinion of management, full collection of principal and interest is unlikely.
The increase in non-accrual loans from December 31, 2003 to June 30, 2004 is primarily due to the addition of five borrowers to non-accrual status. Eight borrowers make up the total non-accrual loans at June 30, 2004. The largest three of the eight borrowers represent 72% of the June 30, 2004 non-accrual balance. Other real estate consisted of two commercial loan properties at December 31, 2003. During the first six months of 2004, one property was sold and two residential properties were placed in other real estate.
For the Three Months Ended June 30, | For the Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 8,293 | $ | 8,467 | $ | 8,390 | $ | 8,398 | ||||||
Loans charged off | (161 | ) | (249 | ) | (349 | ) | (859 | ) | ||||||
Recoveries of loans previously charged off | 107 | 215 | 198 | 369 | ||||||||||
Additions to allowance charged to operations | - | - | - | 525 | ||||||||||
Balance at end of period | $ | 8,239 | $ | 8,433 | $ | 8,239 | $ | 8,433 | ||||||
Net loans charged off to average loans | ||||||||||||||
outstanding [annualized] | .06% | .04% | .08% | .27% |
The allowance for loan losses represents the Corporations estimate of probable credit losses related to specifically identified loans as well as probable credit losses inherent in the remainder of the loan portfolio that have been incurred as of the balance sheet date. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at an adequate level through additions to the provision for loan losses. The level of risk allocated allowance, is determined based on the application of risk percentages to graded loans by categories. Specific reserves are established for individual loans when deemed necessary by management. In addition, management considers other factors when determining the aggregate allowance, including loan quality, changes in the size and character of the loan portfolio, amount of non-performing loans, delinquency trends and local economic conditions.
Inherent risks and uncertainties related to the operation of a financial institution require management to rely on estimates, appraisals and evaluations of loans to prepare the Corporations financial statements. Changes in economic conditions and the financial prospects of borrowers may result in abrupt changes to the estimates, appraisals or evaluations used. In addition, if actual circumstances and losses differ substantially from managements assumptions and estimates, the allowance for loan losses may not be sufficient to absorb all future losses, and net income could be significantly impacted.
-12-
Impaired loans as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 were $12.3 million and $13.0 million, respectively. The allowance for impaired loans was $2.1 million and $2.6 million as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively.
The allowance for loan losses is analyzed quarterly by management. In determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, management determines (i) a specific allocation for loans when a loss is probable, (ii) an allocation based on credit risk rating for other adversely rated loans, (iii) an allocation based on historical losses for various categories of loans, and (iv) subjective factors including local and general economic factors and trends. The allowance for loan losses as a percent of total loans reflects managements assessment of a slowly improving economy and labor market.
June 30, 2004 | December 31, 2003 | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Allowance Amount | % of total allowance | Allowance Amount | % of total allowance |
|||||||||||
Specific allocations | $ | 2,055 | 25 | % | $ | 2,551 | 30 | % | ||||||
Other adversely rated loans | 1,591 | 19 | 2,143 | 26 | ||||||||||
Historical loss allocations | 1,581 | 19 | 1,457 | 17 | ||||||||||
Allocations based upon subjective factors | 3,012 | 37 | 2,239 | 27 | ||||||||||
Total | $ | 8,239 | 100 | % | $ | 8,390 | 100 | % | ||||||
The allocation of the allowance for loan losses attributed to specific allocations and adversely graded loans declined by 22% from December 2003 to June 30, 2004. Loan grading and collateral reviews are frequently updated as new information becomes available for problem loans. The continued shrinkage of the indirect consumer loan portfolio resulted in a $388,000 decline in the allocation of the allowance necessary for consumer loans for the six months ended June 30, 2004. Management believes the allowance for loan losses is adequate based on identified risks. Furthermore, management does not expect that it will be necessary to add to the allowance for loan losses by recording a provision for loan losses during the next several quarters.
Actual losses experienced in the future, could vary significantly from the estimated allocation of the loan loss reserve. Changes in local and national economic factors could significantly affect the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. While amounts are allocated to various portfolios as directed by SFAS No. 118, the entire allowance for loan losses is available to absorb losses from any portfolio segment.
The following table sets forth the deposit balances and the portfolio mix:
June 30, 2004 | December 31, 2003 | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance | % | Balance | % | |||||||||||
Non-interest bearing demand | $ | 57,041 | 15 | % | $ | 49,814 | 13 | % | ||||||
Interest bearing demand | 82,330 | 22 | 48,285 | 13 | ||||||||||
MMDA/Savings | 86,497 | 23 | 102,911 | 28 | ||||||||||
Time deposits - less than $100,000 | 80,528 | 22 | 92,046 | 25 | ||||||||||
Time deposits - greater than $100,000 | 67,863 | 18 | 78,008 | 21 | ||||||||||
Total Deposits | $ | 374,259 | 100 | % | $ | 371,064 | 100 | % | ||||||
In a campaign to collect local deposits, the rate offered on a high interest plus rate checking product was increased dramatically during the first quarter of the year 2004. Although the product does not guarantee an interest rate for any period of time, the balance in this product grew from $11.6 million at December 31, 2003 to $52.3 million at June 30, 2004. Some internal disintermediation occurred from other depository products to the high interest plus product, as total deposits increased only 0.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2004. Time deposits of less than $100,000 have declined as the Bank has intentionally not renewed those time deposit products offered at promotional interest rates. The decline in time deposits greater then $100,000 is attributable to an offset in the growth of core deposits, where as less reliance has been needed for brokered funds.
-13-
Alternative funding sources such as federal funds, brokered time certificates and FHLB advances supplement the Banks core deposits and are an integral component of the Banks asset/liability management effort. Brokered time certificates were $39.7 million at June 30, 2004 and $47.4 million at December 31, 2003.
The Corporation has various financial obligations, including contractual obligations and commitments that may require future cash payments. Management believes that there have been no material changes in the Corporations overall level of these financial obligations since December 31, 2003 and that any changes in the Corporations obligations which have occurred are routine for the industry. Further discussion of the nature of each type of obligation is included in Managements Discussion and Analysis on page 27 of the Corporations Form 10K Annual Report, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Net income was $952,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2004, compared to $1,115,000 for the same period in 2003. This is a 14.6% decrease. The decrease is mainly the attributable to lower net interest income. Although, interest expense for the second quarter of 2004 declined by almost 18% compared to the second quarter of 2003, the absolute dollar impact of reduced interest income for the same quarter more than offset the benefit of reduced interest expense. We anticipate this trend to reverse during the remainder of 2004 as short-term interest rates are expected to increase.
Net income of $1,764,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 was comparable to net income of $1,786,000 for the same period in 2003. However, net interest income declined approximately $1 million when the first six months period of 2004 versus 2003 is compared. Interest income on loans was down $2 million as many borrowers took advantage of the decline in short-term interest rates to switch from fixed to adjustable products. Mortgage banking production has decreased during the first six months of 2004. This has negatively impacted income as gains on sales of loans are down 59% during 2004 due to a decline in mortgage originations resulting from higher mortgage interest rates. The amortization and impairment of mortgage servicing rights declined in the first six months of 2004 due to lower mortgage loan prepayments. In the first six months of 2003, the provision for loan loss was $525,000, while no charges were deemed necessary during 2004.
For the Three Months Ended June 30, |
For the Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||
Net Income | $ | 952 | $ | 1,115 | $ | 1,764 | $ | 1,786 | ||||||
Basic income per share | $ | 0.47 | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.87 | $ | 0.88 | ||||||
Diluted income per share | $ | 0.47 | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.87 | $ | 0.88 | ||||||
Earnings ratios: | ||||||||||||||
Return on average assets | 0.74 | % | 0.85 | % | 0.69 | % | 0.68 | % | ||||||
Return on average equity | 6.90 | % | 8.41 | % | 6.38 | % | 6.81 | % |
-14-
The following schedule presents the average daily balances, interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis (FTE) and interest expense and average rates earned and paid by the Corporation for the periods indicated:
For the Three Months Ended June 30, |
For the Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||
Average earning assets | $ | 486,879 | $ | 488,943 | $ | 484,338 | $ | 491,451 | ||||||
Tax equivalent net interest income | 4,011 | 4,531 | 7,987 | 9,008 | ||||||||||
As a percentage of average earning assets: | ||||||||||||||
Tax equivalent interest income | 5.06 | % | 5.82 | % | 5.08 | % | 5.88 | % | ||||||
Interest expense | 2.12 | % | 2.49 | % | 2.13 | % | 2.56 | % | ||||||
Interest spread | 2.94 | % | 3.33 | % | 2.95 | % | 3.32 | % | ||||||
Tax equivalent net interest income | 3.31 | % | 3.72 | % | 3.32 | % | 3.70 | % | ||||||
Average earning assets as a percentage of | ||||||||||||||
average assets | 94.3 | % | 93.1 | % | 94.4 | % | 92.9 | % |
Net interest income is the principal source of income for the Corporation. Net interest income is the difference between the interest earned on loans and investments and the interest paid on deposits and borrowed funds. Tax equivalent net interest income decreased $520,000 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2004, a decrease of 11% from the same period in 2003. The Corporations spread on interest rates remains compressed as market interest rates have remained in a historically low trough. Competitive pressures within our geographic market have also contributed to the reduced margin. Management expects net interest income to improve during the second half of 2004, aided by expected increases in short-term interest rates. The increase of non-accrual loans during the first six months of 2004 is not expected to have a significant impact on net interest income for the remainder of the year.
The provision for loan losses charged to earnings was $0 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2004, compared to $525,000 for the same period in 2003. Based upon Managements assessment of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, a charge to the provision for loan losses was not necessary during the first six months of 2004. Furthermore, it is unlikely that a charge to the provision for loan losses will be required for the remainder of 2004.
Management took significant steps to improve underwriting standards and administration of the loan portfolios in the prior year. An intentional decision was made to exit the indirect consumer loan business, which Management believes to have an inherently higher risk than the Banks other loan portfolios. Management is optimistic about recent economic trends and their respective impact upon the loan portfolios.
Non-interest income consists of service charges on deposit accounts, insurance fees, brokerage fees, gains or losses on the sales of investments, gains from the sales of mortgage loans and servicing fees on the loans sold with the servicing rights retained. The majority of the mortgage loans the Bank originates are sold to secondary market buyers.
Service charge income on deposit accounts increased by almost 18% for the three months ended June 30, 2004, when compared to the same time period of 2003. The rise in service fee income is mostly attributable to two factors; overdraft fees on checks (volume increase) and electronic banking income (rate and volume increases). Equity securities which no longer fit the long term direction of the Corporation were sold for a gain of $205,000 in the second quarter of 2004.
-15-
Insurance premium revenue declined significantly in the six months of 2004 compared to a year ago. The decline reflects a reduced annual income pass-through from the insurance underwriters, which is based on the loss rate of the Dornbush Insurance Agency policyholders. The income attributable to mortgage banking operations has declined 10% year-to-date and 15% in the second quarter compared to the same periods last year. The decline in mortgage banking revenue for the past six months is due to a 61% decline in the number of mortgage originations. Pricing margins have not changed within the past year. Mortgage originations during the last half of 2004 are expected to be lower then the same period a year ago.
An independent third-party valuation of the Banks mortgage servicing rights indicated that a valuation allowance is not required. The estimated market value is $2.7 million compared to a book value of $2.4 million. As a result, the Bank was able to reverse the previously recorded valuation allowance of approximately $86,000 during the second quarter of 2004.
Non-interest expense decreased $79,000 or 1.8% for the three-month period ended June 30, 2004, versus the same period in 2003. Salary costs increased 3.5% for the second quarter of 2004 versus the second quarter of 2003. The total of full-time equivalent personnel has remained consistent during these two quarterly time periods, although the mix has changed as there are fewer administrative and more branch personnel. Health insurance for employees is up almost 39% or $78,000 for the second quarter of 2004 versus the same period of 2003. FDIC insurance premiums were down from $197,000 to $14,000 for the second quarter of 2004.
Non-interest expense remained level for the six months ended June 30, 2004 compared to the same time period last year. Salaries increased $369,000 or 9% for the six-month period ended June 30, 2004, versus the same period in 2003. The majority of this increase occurred in the first quarter of 2004. The reduction of other non-interest expenses for the six month periods was primarily due to two factors. First, year-to-date FDIC insurance premiums were $28,000 in the first six-months of 2004 versus $377,000 in the same period of 2003. This cost reduction is due to the improved regulatory condition of the Bank. Second, the 1988 directors deferred compensation plan was amended to accrue benefits using a floating rate which is lower than the fixed rate that had been in place since 1988. As a result of the change, the estimated net present value of the liability was reduced by $300,000. The determination of future benefits and expenses will reflect changes in interest rates.
The provision for income taxes was $352,000, which equates to an effective tax rate of 27% for the three-month period ended June 30, 2004, compared to $447,000, which equates to an effective tax rate of 28%, for the same period in 2003. The provision for federal income taxes for the six month period ended June 30, 2004 was consistent with the same period in 2003.
The difference between the Corporations effective tax rate and statutory tax rate is largely due to investment interest income that is exempt from federal taxation. The Corporation does not expect significant fluctuations in the effective tax rate for the remainder of this year.
The majority of assets and liabilities of financial institutions are monetary in nature. Generally, changes in interest rates have a more significant impact on earnings of the Corporation than inflation. Although influenced by inflation, changes in rates do not necessarily move in either the same magnitude or direction as changes in the price of goods and services. Inflation does impact the growth of total assets, creating a need to increase equity capital at a higher rate to maintain an adequate equity to assets ratio, which in turn reduces the amount of earnings available for cash dividends.
The capital of the Corporation consists of common stock, additional paid-in capital, retained earnings and accumulated other comprehensive income. Total stockholders equity increased $126,000, from December 31, 2003, to June 30, 2004; this represents a change of 0.2%. The change in securities valuation caused a $1,484,000 decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income for the quarter ended June 30, 2004.
-16-
A dividend was declared to shareholders as of April 9, 2004 and paid on April 30, 2004 in the amount of $.30 per share. During the first quarter of 2004, the Board of Directors approved a plan to pay a quarterly dividend beginning in the third quarter of 2004. Subject to Board approvals, the new quarterly dividend will be $0.15 per share, per quarter. This will be equivalent to $0.60 on an annual basis.
Management regularly reviews the capital level of the Bank and the Corporation. Management believes that the current level of capital is adequate for current and projected needs at both the Bank and Corporation.
Under the regulatory risk-based capital guidelines in effect for both banks and bank holding companies, minimum capital levels are based upon perceived risk in the Corporations various asset categories. These guidelines assign risk weights to on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet categories in arriving at total risk-adjusted assets. Regulatory capital is divided by the computed total of risk adjusted assets to arrive at the minimum levels prescribed by the Federal Reserve Board at June 30, 2004 as shown in the table below:
Regulatory Requirements | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adequately Capitalized | Well Capitalized | June 30, 2004 | December 31, 2003 | |||||||||||
Tier 1 capital | $ | 54,418 | $ | 53,338 | ||||||||||
Tier 2 capital | 5,299 | 5,036 | ||||||||||||
Total regulatory capital | $ | 59,717 | $ | 58,374 | ||||||||||
Ratio of capital to total assets | ||||||||||||||
Tier 1 leverage ratio | 4 | % | 5 | % | 10.59 | % | 10.56 | % | ||||||
Tier 1 risk-based capital | 4 | % | 6 | % | 12.98 | % | 13.47 | % | ||||||
Total risk-based capital | 8 | % | 10 | % | 14.24 | % | 14.74 | % |
Liquidity is measured by our ability to raise funds through deposits, borrowed funds, infusion of capital, or cash flow from the repayment of loans and investment securities. These funds are used to meet deposit withdrawals, maintain reserve requirements, fund loans and operate our company. Liquidity is primarily achieved through the growth of deposits and liquid assets such as securities available for sale, matured securities, and federal funds sold. Asset and liability management, which is a significant responsibility of the Asset and Liability Management Committee (ALCO), which is the process of managing the balance sheet to achieve a mix of earning assets and liabilities that maximizes profitability, while providing adequate liquidity.
The companys liquidity strategy is to fund loan growth with deposits, and borrowed funds as needed. During the six month period ended June 30, 2004, total loans increased $20 million, which was funded in part by liquidating $7.1 million of federal funds sold and liquidating $3.7 million of securities available for sale. Additional funding was provided by a $3 million increase in deposits and net $6 million increase in borrowed funds.
At June 30, 2004, the banks federal funds purchased position was $11.5 million, slightly higher than the $10 million target established by the ALCO. At June 30, 2004 the bank had available and unused federal funds lines totaling $49 million from various correspondent banks.
Management anticipates that future loan growth will exceed the ability to grow deposits and will likely utilize brokered certificates of deposit and FHLB advances to provide funding for loan growth.
Cash and cash equivalents declined by $7 million in the six-month period ended June 30, 2004. This decline reflects the loan growth and funding strategy discussed above. The current level of cash and cash equivalents is deemed to be near optimal, and as a result, is not expected to change significantly from the June 30, 2004 level.
Market risk is the potential for losses in the fair value of the Corporations assets and liabilities due to changes in interest rates, exchange rates and security pricing. The Corporations exposure to market risk is reviewed on a regular basis by the ALCO. Interest rate risk represents the Corporations primary component of market risk. Interest rate risk is the potential of economic losses due to future interest rate changes. These economic losses can be reflected as a loss of future net interest income and/or a loss of current fair market values. Tools used by management include an interest modeling and simulation model. The objective is to measure the effect on net interest income and to adjust the balance sheet to manage the inherent risk while at the same time maximize income. Management realizes certain risks are inherent and that the goal is to identify and minimize these risks.
-17-
Simulation Model
Simulations models require numerous assumptions that have a significant impact on the measured interest rate risk. Simulation models attempt to predict customer reaction to interest rate changes, changes in the competitive environment, and other economic factors. In running our Interest Rate Scenario Analysis (IRSA) simulation model, we first forecast the next twelve months of net interest income under an assumed environment of constant market interest rates. Next, immediate and parallel interest rate shocks are constructed in the model. These rate shocks reflect changes of equal magnitude to all market interest rates. The next twelve months of net interest income are then forecast under each of the rate shock scenarios. The resulting change in net interest income is an indication of the sensitivity of our earnings to directional changes in market interest rates. The IRSA model is based solely on parallel changes in market rates and does not reflect the levels of interest rate risk that may arise from other factors such as changes in the spreads between key market rates or in the shape of the Treasury yield curve. The net interest income sensitivity is monitored by the ALCO which evaluates the results in conjunction with acceptable interest rate risk parameters. The simulation also measures the change in the Economic Value of Equity. This represents the change in the net present value of our assets and liabilities under the same parallel shifts in interest rates, as calculated by discounting the estimated future cash flows using a market-based discount rate. Cash flow estimates incorporate anticipated changes in prepayment speeds of loans and securities. The following table shows the suggested impact on net interest income over the next twelve months, and the Economic Value of Equity based on our balance sheet as of June 30, 2004.
Change in Interest Rates | Market Value of Portfolio Equity(1) | Percent Change | Net Interest Income(2) | Percent Change | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
300 basis point rise | $ | 41,866 | (-23.8 | %) | $ | 18,402 | 10.0 | % | ||||||
200 basis point rise | 46,271 | (15.8 | %) | 17,859 | 6.8 | % | ||||||||
100 basis point rise | 50,621 | (7.9 | %) | 17,304 | 3.4 | % | ||||||||
Base rate | 54,950 | - | 16,728 | - | ||||||||||
100 basis point decline | 58,614 | 6.7 | % | 15,597 | (6.8 | %) | ||||||||
200 basis point decline | 62,267 | 13.3 | % | 13,343 | (20.2 | %) | ||||||||
300 basis point decline | 66,449 | 20.9 | % | 10,505 | (37.2 | %) |
(1) | Simulation analyses calculate the change in the net present value of the Corporations assets and liabilities, under parallel shifts in interest rates, by discounting the estimated future cash flows. |
(2) | Simulation analyses calculate the change in net interest income, under parallel shifts in interest rates over the next 12 months, based on a static balance sheet. |
(a) | Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Corporations Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of the Corporations disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q Quarterly Report, have concluded that the Corporations disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and effective to ensure that material information relating to the Corporation would be made known to them by others within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which this Form 10-Quarterly Report was being prepared. |
(b) | Changes in Internal Controls. During the period covered by this report, there have been no changes in the Corporations internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Corporations internal control over financial reporting. |
-18-
Annual meeting of stockholders was held on April 15, 2004. The Stockholders of the Corporation voted on the following matter at the meeting. |
Election of three directors with terms expiring in 2007 |
Director Nominee Norman J. Fifelski Dellvan J. Hoezee James B. Meyer |
In Favor 1,103,421 1,105,655 1,041,354 |
Withheld 30,714 28,480 92,780 |
(a) | Exhibits |
31.1 | Certificate of the President and Chief Executive Officer of OAK Financial Corporation pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31.2 | Certificate of the Chief Financial Officer of OAK Financial Corporation pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.1 | Certificate of the Chief Executive Officer of OAK Financial Corporation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.2 | Certificate of the Chief Financial Officer of OAK Financial Corporation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
(b) | Reports on Form 8K |
Report on Form 8-K dated April 16, 2004, with respect to press release announcing results for the quarter and ended March 31, 2004. |
Report on Form 8-K dated June 25, 2004, with respect to press release announcing a quarterly cash dividend. |
-19-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
OAK FINANCIAL CORPORATION /s/ Patrick K. Gill Patrick K. Gill (Chief Executive Officer) /s/ James A. Luyk James A. Luyk (Chief Financial Officer) |
Date: August 9, 2004
-20-
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit | Description |
31.1 | Certificate of the President and Chief Executive Officer of OAK Financial Corporation pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31.2 | Certificate of the Chief Financial Officer of OAK Financial Corporation pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.1 | Certificate of the Chief Executive Officer of OAK Financial Corporation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31.2 | Certificate of the Chief Financial Officer of OAK Financial Corporation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
-21-
I, Patrick K. Gill, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of OAK Financial Corporation; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. | The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: |
(a) | designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
(b) | evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
(c) | disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. | The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
(a) | all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
(b) | any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting; |
Dated: August 9, 2004
/s/ Patrick K. Gill Patrick K. Gill President and Chief Executive Officer |
-22-
I, James A. Luyk, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of OAK Financial Corporation; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. | The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: |
(a) | designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
(b) | evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
(c) | disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. | The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
(a) | all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
(b) | any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting; |
Dated: August 9, 2004
/s/ James A. Luyk James A. Luyk Chief Financial Officer |
-23-
I, Patrick K. Gill, Chief Executive Officer of OAK Financial Corporation certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
(2) the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OAK Financial Corporation.
Dated: August 9, 2004
/s/ Patrick K. Gill Patrick K. Gill Chief Executive Officer |
-24-
I, James A. Luyk, Chief Financial Officer of OAK Financial Corporation certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
(2) the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OAK Financial Corporation.
Dated: August 9, 2004
/s/ James A. Luyk James A. Luyk Chief Financial Officer |
-25-