Back to GetFilings.com

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

Commission File Number 0-23832

PSS WORLD MEDICAL, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

[X] Yes [ ] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

[X] Yes [ ] No

The number of shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share, of the registrant outstanding as of February 7, 2005 was 64,638,186 shares.

PSS WORLD MEDICAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

DECEMBER 31, 2004

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2

CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS

Forward-Looking Statements

Management may from time-to-time make written or oral forward-looking statements with respect to the Company’s annual or long-term goals, including statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2004, Reports on Form 8-K, and reports to shareholders. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical earnings and those currently anticipated or projected. Management cautions readers not to place undue reliance on any of the Company’s forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made.

Words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “may,” “could,” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that involve risks and uncertainties include, without limitation:

• the Company’s consideration of whether to elect to settle the principal amount of its convertible senior notes in cash;
  
  
• the Company’s intent to vigorously defend against the claims from the securities class action lawsuit which is described in Note 11, Commitments and Contingencies;
  
  
• management’s belief that the ultimate outcome of the various litigation matters described in Note 11, Commitments and Contingencies, and various other litigation that have arisen in the normal course of business will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations;
  
  
• management’s belief that the elder care market is expected to continue benefiting from the increasing growth rate of the elderly American population;
  
  
• management’s belief that the physician market is expected to continue to benefit from the shift of procedures and diagnostic testing in hospitals to alternate sites, particularly physician offices and home care providers;
  
  
• management’s belief that the recent changes to Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement rates and the introduction of the Medicare/Medicaid prescription drug program that became effective beginning in the U.S. government fiscal year 2004 will positively impact the financial condition of elder care providers and financial strength of the elder care industry;
  
  
• management’s belief that nursing home divestitures within the Elder Care Business may continue to impact fiscal year 2005 as large, national chain customers may continue to divest underperforming facilities and facilities located in states with high malpractice claims, insurance costs, and litigation exposure;
  
  
• management’s belief that its strategy of centralizing the procurement and disbursements functions has resulted, and will continue to result, in efficiencies and savings that will increase gross profit;
  
  
• management’s expectation that gross profit as a percentage of net sales may decrease in future periods due to an expected increased sales volume of pharmaceutical products and diagnostic equipment in the Physician Business, which generally generate lower gross profit margins;
  
  
• management’s expectation that gross profit as a percentage of net sales may increase in future periods as a result of growth in ancillary billing services in the Elder Care Business;
  
  
  

  3

  ---

• management’s anticipation that rising fuel costs may negatively impact both the Physician Business’ and the Elder Care Business’ cost to deliver or expected improvements in cost to deliver during the remainder of fiscal year 2005 and fiscal year 2006;
  
  
• management’s expectation that the results of the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) audit of the Federal income tax returns for fiscal years 2002 and 2003 will not have a material impact on our financial condition or consolidated results of operations;
  
  
• management’s expectation that the net operating loss generated as a result of the sale of the Imaging Business will be carried forward and applied against regular taxable income in future years;
  
  
• management’s expectation that the overall growth in the business will be funded through a combination of cash flows from operating activities, borrowings under the revolving line of credit, capital markets, and/or other financing arrangements;
  
  
• management’s belief that the Company may seek to retire its outstanding equity through cash purchases and/or reduce its debt and may also seek to issue additional debt or equity to meet its future liquidity requirements;
  
  
• the possibility that the Company may seek to issue additional debt or equity to meet its future liquidity requirements;
  
  
• management’s expectation that the implementation of the JD Edwards XE® distribution modules at the Elder Care Business distribution centers beginning in fiscal year 2005 and continuing into the second quarter of fiscal year 2006 will be successfully completed without disrupting the operations of the business;
  
  
• management’s expectation that the net sales and the sales mix for the fiscal year ended April 1, 2005 will continue to be impacted by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency’s, a U.K. regulatory body, action to suspend Chiron Corporation’s license to manufacture the Fluvirin® influenza vaccine; and
  
  
• management’s belief that the Congressional Joint Committee on Taxation will uphold and approve the agreed-upon settlement with the Appeals Office of the IRS.

In connection with the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, management is identifying important factors that could affect the Company’s financial performance and could cause actual results for future periods to differ materially from any opinions or statements expressed with respect to future periods in any current statements. The Company’s future results could be adversely affected by a variety of factors, including:

• pricing and customer credit-quality pressures due to reduced spending budgets by healthcare providers;
  
  
• government legislation that imposes changes in reimbursement rates to the Company’s customers or changes in reimbursement rates to the Company’s ancillary billing services Company;
  
  
• the Company’s dependence on sophisticated data processing systems that may impair business operations if they fail to operate properly or not as anticipated;
  
  
• competitive pricing pressures related to the Company’s sales to large nursing home chains and consolidating provider groups;
  
  
• the loss of any significant distributorship agreements, the renegotiation of terms and conditions of existing agreements, and the Company’s reliance on current relationships with vendors;
  
  
• maintaining good relations with employees including over 800 sales professionals;
  
  
• the concentration of revenues among a limited number of customers in the Elder Care Business and the loss of a significant customer;

  4

  ---

• the Company’s level of indebtedness, which may limit its ability to obtain financing in the future and may limit flexibility to react to market conditions;
  
  
• the potential interest and penalty exposure related to existing and future IRS audits;
  
  
• litigation and liability exposure for existing and potential claims;
  
  
• the Company’s failure to execute its business plan and strategies for growth;
  
  
• the adoption of new accounting pronouncements or Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations, including the proposed amendment to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, Earnings Per Share;
  
  
• the costs of complying with the provisions of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act;
  
  
• the Company’s failure to comply with Federal and state regulations pertaining to filing claims for health care reimbursement or changes in the interpretation of those requirements;
  
  
• the Company’s inability to obtain certain medical supplies and pharmaceuticals due to vendor supply disruptions, including influenza vaccines;
  
  
• operational disruptions due to natural disasters, particularly in regions susceptible to hurricanes;
  
  
• the potential impact of China’s currency revaluation;
  
  
• the Company’s failure to successfully integrate the operations of a long-term medical supply distributor, which was acquired on October 7, 2004; and
  
  
• the potential for a change in a state’s legal system that would impact the enforceability of the non-solicitation covenants.
  
  

In addition, all forward-looking statements are qualified by and should be read in conjunction with the risks described or referred to in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, under the heading “Risk Factors” of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2004.

5

PART I— FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PSS WORLD MEDICAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31, 2004 AND APRIL 2, 2004
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Share Data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements

6

PSS WORLD MEDICAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004 AND 2003
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements

7

PSS WORLD MEDICAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004 AND 2003
(UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in Thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

8

PSS WORLD MEDICAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data, Unless Otherwise Noted)

1.   BACKGROUND AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Nature of Operations

PSS World Medical, Inc. (the “Company” or “PSSI”), a Florida corporation which began operations in 1983, is a specialty marketer and distributor of medical products, equipment, and pharmaceutical related products to alternate-site healthcare providers including physician offices, long-term care facilities, and home care providers through 43 full-service distribution centers, which serve all 50 states throughout the United States of America (“U.S.”). The Company currently conducts business through two operating segments, the Physician Business and the Elder Care Business. These strategic segments serve a diverse customer base. A third reporting segment, titled Corporate Shared Services, includes allocated and unallocated costs of corporate departments that provide services to the operating segments.

The Physician Business, or the Physician Sales & Service division, is a leading distributor of medical supplies, diagnostic equipment, and pharmaceutical related products to primary care office-based physicians in the U.S. The Physician Business currently operates 29 full-service distribution centers, 22 break-freight locations, and two redistribution facilities serving physician offices in all 50 states.

The Elder Care Business, or the Gulf South Medical Supply, Inc. subsidiary, is a leading national distributor of medical supplies and related products to the long-term and elder care industry in the U.S. In addition, the Elder Care Business offers Medicare Part B billing services, either on a fee for service or a full assignment basis, and provides products reimbursable under Medicare Part B. The Elder Care Business currently operates 14 full-service distribution centers, two break-freight locations, and one ancillary billing service center serving independent, regional, and national skilled nursing facilities, assisted living centers, and home care providers in all 50 states.

Historically, the Company conducted business under a third operating segment, the Imaging Business. On November 18, 2002, the Company completed the sale of the Imaging Business, or the Diagnostic Imaging, Inc. subsidiary (“DI”), a distributor of medical diagnostic imaging supplies, chemicals, equipment, and services to the acute and alternate-care markets in the U.S. Refer to Note 12, Discontinued Operations, for further discussion.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been omitted pursuant to SEC rules and regulations. The consolidated financial statements reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position and results of operations for the periods indicated.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP and include the consolidated accounts of PSS World Medical, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The consolidated balance sheet as of April 2, 2004 has been derived from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2004. The financial statements and related notes included in this report should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2004.

The Company reports its year-end financial position, results of operations, and cash flows on the Friday closest to March 31. Fiscal year 2005 consists of 52 weeks or 253 selling days whereas fiscal year 2004 consisted of 53 weeks or 258 selling days. The Company reports its quarter-end financial position, results of operations, and cash flows on the Friday closest to month-end for those quarters in which physical inventories are taken and on the calendar month-end for those quarters in which physical inventories are not taken. The following table summarizes the number of selling days in each period presented.

9

The results of operations for the interim periods covered by this report may not be indicative of operating results for the full fiscal year or any other interim periods.

Non-solicitation Payments

Certain sales representatives employed by the Physician and Elder Care Businesses have executed employment agreements in exchange for a cash payment (“Non-solicitation Payments”). These employment agreements include non-solicitation covenants, which state that the sales representative can neither solicit nor accept business from certain of the Company’s customers for a one-year period subsequent to the date the sales representative ceases employment with the Company. The costs of these Non-solicitation Payments made to sales representatives are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over an estimated useful life, which is the expected employment period of the sales representative plus one year for the non-solicitation period. If a sales representative terminates employment prior to the end of the estimated useful life of the agreement, the remaining net book value of the asset will be amortized over the one-year, non-solicitation period.

During the period the sales representatives remain employed with the Company, the non-solicitation intangible asset is evaluated for impairment in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (“SFAS 144”). SFAS 144 requires the Company to test for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. Certain factors which may occur and indicate that an impairment exists include, but are not limited to: (i) a change in a state’s legal system that would impact any legal opinion relied upon when assessing enforceability of the non-solicitation covenants, (ii) a decline in sales generated by a sales representative below the amount that the non-solicitation was based upon, (iii) death, or (iv) full retirement by the sales representative. In the event that the carrying value of the assets are determined to be unrecoverable, the Company would estimate the fair value of the assets and record an impairment charge for the excess of the carrying value over the fair value.

Stock Repurchase Programs

On June 8, 2004, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program authorizing the Company to repurchase up to a maximum of 5% of its common stock, or approximately 3.2 million common shares. These repurchases depend upon market conditions and other factors, and are to be made in the open market, in privately negotiated transactions, or otherwise. During the nine months ended December 31, 2004, the Company repurchased approximately 1.0 million shares of common stock under this program at an average price of $9.91 per common share. During the nine months ended December 31, 2003, the Company repurchased approximately 1.0 million shares of common stock under a previously approved stock repurchase program at an average price of $5.92 per common share.

Reclassification

Certain amounts reported in prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In October 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) issued its consensus opinion on EITF Issue No. 04-8, The Effect of Contingently Convertible Debt on Diluted Earnings Per Share (“EITF 04-8”). EITF 04-8 requires that contingently convertible debt instruments with embedded conversion features that are contingent upon market price triggers be included in diluted earnings per share computations, if dilutive, regardless of whether the contingency has been met. The provisions of EITF 04-08 are effective for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2004. Once the Company’s stock price reaches $17.10, the dilutive effect of the Company’s $150 million 2.25% convertible senior notes, which have an embedded conversion feature that is contingent upon a market price trigger, is required to be reflected in diluted earnings per share by application of the treasury stock method. By application of the treasury stock method, a range of approximately 0 to 1.5 million shares (at a stock price range of $17.10 (conversion price) to $20.51(market price trigger)) will be included in the weighted average common shares outstanding used in computing diluted earnings per share because of the Company’s stated policy to settle the principal amount of the convertible senior notes in cash. (Refer to Note 2, Earnings Per Share, for a related discussion.) However, the diluted earnings per share

10

calculation may be further impacted once the Proposed Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, Earnings Per Share, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 128 (“SFAS 128(R)”) becomes effective. SFAS 128(R) eliminates the provisions of SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share that allows an entity to rebut the presumption that contracts with the option of settling in either cash or stock will be settled in stock. Therefore, SFAS 128(R) may eliminate the Company’s ability to use a stated policy to settle the principal amount of the Company’s convertible senior notes in cash. Upon the effective date of SFAS 128(R), the number of diluted weighted average shares outstanding would include approximately 8.8 million shares and earnings used to calculate diluted earnings per share would increase approximately $2.7 million (after tax) for the interest expense on the convertible senior notes. The Company may elect to settle the principal amount of its convertible senior notes in cash in accordance with the terms of the indenture. If such election is made, a range of approximately 0 to 1.5 million shares (at a stock price of $17.10 (conversion price) to $20.51(market price trigger)) will be included in the weighted average common shares outstanding used in computing diluted earnings per share in accordance with the provisions of EITF 04-08.

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (“SFAS 123(R)”). This Statement revises SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (“SFAS 123”) by eliminating the option to account for employee stock options under Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (“APB 25”) and generally requires companies to recognize the cost of employee services received in exchange for awards of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of those awards (the “fair-value-based method”). The Company is required to adopt SFAS 123(R) on July 1, 2005. As discussed in Note 4, Stock Based Compensation, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved an amendment to all outstanding stock options as of June 7, 2004 that accelerated the vesting of any unvested stock option as of April 1, 2005. Therefore, the impact of adopting SFAS 123(R) will be immaterial. The Company will incur an immaterial amount of compensation expense for stock options granted subsequent to June 7, 2004.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29 (“SFAS 153”). SFAS 153 addresses the measurement of exchanges of nonmonetary assets and redefines the scope of transactions that should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. SFAS 153 is effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring beginning in our second quarter of fiscal 2006. The adoption of SFAS 153 will not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

2.   EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic and diluted earnings per share are presented in accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share. Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during the year adjusted for the potential dilutive effect of stock options using the treasury stock method and the conversion of the $150 million 2.25% convertible senior notes if the conditions that would permit conversion have been satisfied. Common equivalent shares are excluded from the computation in periods in which they have an antidilutive effect.

The following table sets forth basic and diluted earnings per share computational data for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 (share amounts in thousands, except per share data):

11

12

3.   COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Comprehensive income represents all changes in equity of an enterprise that result from recognized transactions and other economic events during the period. Other comprehensive income refers to revenues, expenses, gains, and losses that under GAAP are included in comprehensive income but excluded from net income, such as the unrealized gain or loss on the interest rate swap. The following table details the components of comprehensive income for the periods presented.

4.   STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company applies the intrinsic-value recognition and measurement principles of APB 25, and related interpretations, in accounting for stock-based compensation plans. It has been the Company’s policy to only issue stock options with an exercise price greater than or equal to the current market price of the underlying stock. Accordingly, under APB 25, the Company does not record compensation expense at the time an employee stock option is issued. The Company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS 123. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the fair-value-based method of accounting prescribed by SFAS 123 had been applied to all outstanding and unvested awards in each period.

13

During June 2004, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved an amendment to all outstanding stock options granted to employees. This amendment accelerated the vesting of all unvested stock options outstanding as of April 1, 2005, which is prior to the effective date of SFAS 123(R). The Company took this action to avoid compensation expense in future periods in light of SFAS 123(R), which is effective for the Company’s second quarter of fiscal year 2006. Under SFAS 123(R), the Company estimated that a compensation charge of approximately $2.8 million, net of tax, would have been recorded in future periods if the vesting of the stock options was not accelerated. As a result of the acceleration, the Company recognized a contingent compensation expense equal to the difference between the fair market value of the common stock on the modification date and the option exercise price for the estimated number of options that, absent the acceleration, would have expired unexercisable as a result of the termination of the holders’ employment prior to the original vesting dates of the options. The maximum stock-based compensation expense would be approximately $3.4 million if all holders benefited from this amendment with respect to outstanding options. The Company has estimated and recognized compensation expense in the accompanying statements of operations of approximately $0.1 million based on its historical option forfeiture rate. This liability will be adjusted in future periods based on actual experience and changes in management assumptions.

5.   GOODWILL

The change in the carrying value of goodwill during the nine months ended December 31, 2004 is as follows:

The terms of one purchase agreement provided for additional consideration to be paid (earn-out payment) if the acquired entity’s earnings before interest expense, provision for income taxes, depreciation and amortization, as defined, exceeded a targeted level. During the nine months ended December 31, 2004, the Elder Care Business paid $1,685 under this agreement. In addition, approximately $5,600 of potential earn-out payments exist at December 31, 2004 if minimum revenue thresholds are met in future periods and final working capital balances as of the closing date of the transaction are validated and settled.

14

6.   INTANGIBLES

The following table summarizes the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization for existing intangible assets subject to amortization by business segment and major asset class.

Total amortization expense for intangible assets for the three months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 was $1,278 and $782, respectively. Total amortization expense for intangible assets for the nine months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 was $3,049 and $1,882, respectively. The estimated amortization expense for the next five fiscal years is as follows:

15

The remaining weighted-average amortization period, in total and by major asset class, is as follows:

Future minimum payments required under non-competition agreements at December 31, 2004 are as follows:

7.   DEBT

Debt consists of the following:

2.25% Convertible Senior Notes

On March 8, 2004, the Company sold $150 million principal amount of 2.25% convertible senior notes, which mature on March 15, 2024. Interest on the notes is payable semiannually in arrears on March 15 and September 15 of each year. Contingent interest is also payable during any six-month interest period, beginning with the six-month interest period commencing on March 15, 2009, if the average trading price of the notes for the five trading days ending on the second trading day immediately preceding such six-month interest period equals or exceeds 120% of the principal amount of the notes. The amount of contingent interest payable per note in respect of any six-month interest period is equal to 0.25% of the average trading price of a note for the trading period referenced above.

The notes may be converted into shares of the Company’s common stock under the following circumstances: (i) prior to March 15, 2019, during any calendar quarter that the closing sale price of the Company’s common stock for at least 20 of the 30 consecutive trading days ending the day prior to such quarter is greater than 120% of the applicable conversion price of $17.10 per share; (ii) if on any date after March 15, 2019, the closing sale price of the Company’s common stock is greater than 120% of the then applicable conversion price; (iii) during the five consecutive business day period following any five consecutive trading day period in which the trading price for a note for each day of that trading period is less than 98% of the closing sale price of the Company’s common stock on such corresponding trading day multiplied by the applicable conversion rate, provided that if the price of the Company’s common stock issuable upon conversion is between 100% and 120%

16

of the applicable conversion price, then holders will be entitled to receive upon conversion only the value of the principal amount of the notes converted plus accrued and unpaid interest, including contingent interest, if any; (iv) if the Company has called the notes for redemption; (v) during any period in which the Company’s long-term issuer rating assigned by Moody’s Investor Services (“Moody’s”) is at or below Caa1 or the corporate credit rating assigned by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services, a division of McGraw Hill Companies, Inc. and its successors (“S&P”), is at or below B-, or if the Company is no longer rated by at least one of S&P or Moody’s; or (vi) upon the occurrence of specified corporate transactions described in the indenture governing the notes. The initial conversion rate is 58.4949 shares of common stock per each $1 (in thousands) principal amount of notes and is equivalent to an initial conversion price of $17.10 per share. The conversion rate is subject to adjustment if certain events occur, such as stock dividends or other distributions of cash, securities, indebtedness or assets; stock splits and combinations; issuances of rights or warrants; tender offers; or repurchases. Upon conversion, the Company has the right to deliver, in lieu of common stock, cash or a combination of cash and common stock. The Company’s stated policy is to satisfy the Company’s obligation upon a conversion of the notes first, in cash, in an amount equal to the principal amount of the notes converted and second, in shares of the Company’s common stock, to satisfy the remainder, if any, of the Company’s conversion obligation. Once the Company’s stock price reaches $17.10, the dilutive effect of the convertible notes may be reflected in diluted earnings per share by application of the treasury stock method. By application of the treasury stock method, a range of approximately 0 to 1.5 million shares (at a stock price range of $17.10 (conversion price) to $20.51(market price trigger)) will be included in the weighted average common shares outstanding used in computing diluted earnings per share because of the Company’s stated policy to settle the principal amount of the convertible senior notes in cash.

Revolving Line of Credit

The Company maintains an asset-based revolving line of credit by and among the Company, as borrower thereunder (the “Borrower”), the subsidiaries of the Company, the lenders from time to time party thereto (the “Lenders”), and Bank of America, N.A. (the “Bank”), as agent for the Lenders (the “Credit Agreement”), which permits maximum borrowings of up to $200 million and matures on March 31, 2008. Availability of borrowings depends upon a borrowing base calculation consisting of accounts receivable and inventory, subject to satisfaction of certain eligibility requirements. Borrowings under the revolving line of credit bear interest at the Bank’s prime rate plus an applicable margin based on the Company’s funded debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (the “Leverage Ratio”), or at LIBOR plus an applicable margin based on the Leverage Ratio. Additionally, the Credit Agreement bears interest at a fixed rate of 0.375% for any unused portion of the facility. Under the Credit Agreement, the Company and its subsidiaries are subject to certain covenants, including but not limited to, limitations on (i) paying dividends and repurchasing stock, (ii) selling or transferring assets, (iii) making certain investments including acquisitions, (iv) incurring additional indebtedness and liens, and (v) annual capital expenditures. Borrowings under the revolving line of credit are anticipated to (i) fund future requirements for working capital, capital expenditures, and acquisitions and (ii) issue letters of credit. Although the Credit Agreement expires on March 31, 2008, the revolving line of credit is classified as a current liability in accordance with EITF No. 95-22, Balance Sheet Classification of Borrowings Outstanding under Revolving Credit Agreements That Include both a Subjective Acceleration Clause and a Lock-Box Arrangement. The Company is not obligated to repay or refinance amounts outstanding under the revolving line of credit until fiscal year 2008.

As of December 31, 2004, the Company had sufficient assets based on eligible accounts receivable and inventory to borrow up to approximately $191.9 million under the revolving line of credit and had outstanding borrowings of $25.0 million. The average daily interest rate, excluding debt issuance costs and unused line fees, for the three months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, was 4.16% and 3.70%, respectively. The average daily interest rate, excluding debt issuance costs and unused line fees, for the nine months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, was 3.94%.

From time-to-time, the Company has amended the Credit Agreement to meet specific business objectives and requirements. The Credit Agreement originally dated May 20, 2003 has been amended as follows:

• The First Amendment dated June 24, 2003 primarily finalized the syndication of the Credit Agreement to the Lenders.
  
  
• The Second Amendment dated December 16, 2003 primarily increased the maximum borrowings under the Credit Agreement from $150 million to $200 million. In addition, this amendment redefined the applicable margin applied to the Bank’s prime rate or LIBOR.
  
  
• The Third Amendment dated March 1, 2004 obtained the Lenders’ approval to issue additional indebtedness in the form of the convertible senior notes and to repurchase up to $42.0 million of the Company’s common stock, including any repurchases made subsequent to May 20, 2003. In addition, this amendment locked the interest rate on the Credit Agreement at the Bank’s prime rate or at LIBOR plus 2.00% for the period of one year, concurrent with the Company’s fiscal year 2005.

  17

  ---

• The Fourth Amendment dated June 1, 2004 obtained the Lenders’ approval to increase the aggregate amount of permitted stock repurchases from $42.0 million to $55.0 million, which includes any stock repurchases made subsequent to May 20, 2003.
  
  
• The Fifth Amendment dated October 1, 2004 obtained the Lenders’ approval to (i) extend the term of the agreement two years to March 31, 2008, (ii) increase the aggregate amount of permitted stock repurchases from $55.0 million to $80.0 million, which includes any stock repurchases made subsequent to May 20, 2003, (iii) increase the aggregate amount of permitted acquisitions from $50.0 million to $75.0 million, which includes any acquisitions made subsequent to May 20, 2003, (iv) sets the applicable margin level for Base Rate and LIBOR loans to -0.25% and 1.75%, respectively, for the period beginning October 1, 2004 and ending March 26, 2005.
  
  

During the three months ended June 30, 2003, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement to hedge the variable interest rate of its revolving line of credit. Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreement, the Company makes payments based on the fixed rate and will receive interest payments based on 1-month LIBOR. The changes in market value of this financial instrument are highly correlated with changes in market value of the hedged item both at inception and over the life of the agreement. Amounts received or paid under the interest rate swap agreement are recorded as reductions or additions to interest expense. In accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, SFAS No. 138, Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133, and SFAS No. 149,Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, the Company’s interest rate swap agreement has been designated as a cash flow hedge with changes in fair value recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

On July 19, 2004, the Company elected to reduce the notional amount of the interest rate swap from $35 million to $25 million. Accordingly, during the nine months ended December 31, 2004, the Company reclassified a gain of $61 from accumulated other comprehensive income to interest expense related to the portion of the swap that was terminated.

As of December 31, 2004, the swap carries a notional principal amount of $25 million and effectively fixes the interest rate on a portion of the revolving line of credit to 2.195%, prior to applying the Leverage Ratio margin discussed above. The swap agreement expires on March 28, 2006 and settles monthly until expiration. At December 31, 2004 and April 2, 2004, the Company recorded an unrealized gain (loss), net of related tax effects, of $176 and ($40), respectively, for the estimated fair value of the swap agreement in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

8.   INCOME TAXES

During fiscal year 2002, the Company sold its International Business, which generated a capital loss carryforward. At the time of sale, management believed it was more likely than not that the Company would be unable to use the capital loss before its expiration in fiscal year 2007 and, accordingly, a valuation allowance was recorded. Based on recent Tax Court rulings, the Company filed a refund claim with the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) during the three months ended December 31, 2003, to report an ordinary worthless stock deduction on the sale of the International Business. The refund claim reflected a reclassification of the nondeductible capital loss to a tax-deductible ordinary loss. The worthless stock deduction claim was combined with the formal protest to the results of the audit of the federal income tax returns for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2000 and March 30, 2001 and was submitted to the Appeals Office of the IRS. During the three months ended December 31, 2004, the Company and the Appeals Office of the IRS reached a settlement. This settlement, which is subject to final review and approval by the Congressional Joint Committee on Taxation (“Joint Committee”), resulted in a one-time reduction to the provision for income taxes for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2004 of approximately $5.6 million, or approximately $0.08 diluted earnings per share. Management believes that the Joint Committee will uphold and approve the agreed-upon settlement with the Appeals Office of the IRS.

During the three months ended December 31, 2004, the IRS completed fieldwork on the audit of the federal income tax returns for the fiscal years ended March 29, 2002 and March 28, 2003. The Company plans to appeal certain findings, which primarily related to timing of tax deductions, with the Appeals Office of the IRS. Management does not anticipate the results of the audit to have a material impact on the financial condition or consolidated results of operations of the Company.

9.   SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company’s reportable segments are strategic businesses that offer different products to different segments of the healthcare industry, and are the basis upon which management regularly evaluates the Company. These segments are managed separately because of different customers and products. See Note 1, Background and Basis of Presentation, for descriptive information about the Company’s operating segments. The Company primarily evaluates the operating performance of its segments based on net sales and income from operations. The following table presents financial information about the Company’s business segments:

18

19

10.  PURCHASE BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

The following acquisitions were accounted for under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Acquisitions (“SFAS 141”);accordingly, the operations of the acquired companies have been included in the Company’s results of operations subsequent to the date of acquisition. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their estimated fair values at the date of the acquisition as determined by management based on information currently available. Supplemental unaudited pro forma information, assuming these acquisitions were made at the beginning of the immediate preceding period, is not presented as the results would not differ materially from the amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Fiscal Year 2005

On October 7, 2004, the Elder Care Business acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of a long-term care medical supply distributor. The maximum aggregate purchase price is approximately $27,012, subject to certain adjustments as set forth in the Purchase Agreement, of which $19,751 was paid in cash at the closing. Pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the remaining purchase price of up to $5,600 will be paid to the Seller by April 30, 2005 if minimum revenue thresholds are met in future periods and final working capital balances as of the closing date are validated and settled. The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition.

20

Goodwill of $7,907 was assigned to the Elder Care Business and is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. Of the $7,544 of acquired intangible assets, $6,400, $623, and $521 was assigned to customer relationships, signing bonuses, and non-solicitation agreements, respectively. The acquired intangible assets have a weighted-average useful life of approximately 6.4 years as of the date of acquisition.

Fiscal Year 2004

During the nine months ended December 31, 2003, the Company acquired the stock of a service company that provides ancillary billing services to the long-term care industry and a long-term care medical supply distributor. The Company also acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of a billing service company. The aggregate purchase price, net of cash acquired, for these acquired companies was $21,963. The Company obtained independent valuations of certain intangible assets and the final allocation of the purchase price was finalized during the three months ended December 31, 2004. The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition.

Goodwill of $10,506 was assigned to the Elder Care Business and is expected to be nondeductible for tax purposes. Of the $6,700 of acquired intangible assets, $1,200 and $5,500 was assigned to non-competition agreements and customer relationships, respectively. The acquired intangible assets have a weighted-average useful life of approximately 6.1 years as of the date of acquisition.

11.   COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Litigation

The Company, through its Elder Care Business, its Physician Business, and/or predecessor companies, has been named as one of many defendants in latex glove product liability claims in various federal and state courts. The defendants are primarily distributors of certain brands of latex gloves. The Company’s insurers have settled all of the outstanding cases, without expense to the Company. Defense costs were allocated by agreement between a consortium of insurers on a pro rata basis for each case depending upon policy years and alleged years of exposure. All of the insurance carriers defended the cases subject to a reservation of rights.

21

The Company and certain of its current and former officers and directors are named as defendants in a securities class action lawsuit entitled Jack Hirsch v. PSS World Medical, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:98-CV 502-J-32TEM. The action, which was filed in May 1998, is pending in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville Division. The plaintiff seeks indeterminate damages, including costs and expenses. The plaintiff initially alleged, for himself and for a purported class of similarly situated stockholders who purchased the Company’s stock between December 23, 1997 and May 8, 1998 that the defendants engaged in violations of certain provisions of the Securities Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. The allegations reference a decline in the Company’s stock price following an announcement by the Company in May 1998 regarding the Gulf South Medical Supply, Inc. merger, which resulted in earnings below analysts’ expectations. In December 2002, the Court granted the Company’s motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s second amended complaint with prejudice with respect to the Section 10(b) claims. The plaintiffs filed their third amended complaint in January 2003 alleging claims under Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act on behalf of a putative class of all persons who were shareholders of the Company as of March 26, 1998. In May 2003, the Court denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss. By order dated February 18, 2004, the Court granted plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. Court ordered mediation occurred on June 10, 2004, during which the parties were not able to resolve their dispute. The case is set for trial in October 2005. The Company intends to vigorously defend the proceedings; however, there can be no assurance that this litigation will be ultimately resolved on terms that are favorable to the Company. An estimate of the potential loss or range of loss cannot be determined.

The Company was named along with certain present and former directors and officers as a defendant in ten related class action complaints, the first of which was filed on July 13, 2001, in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. Those ten actions were consolidated into a single action under the caption “In Re PSS World Medical Inc. Securities Litigation.” The amended complaint was filed as a purported class action on behalf of persons who purchased or acquired PSS World Medical, Inc. common stock at various times during the period between October 26, 1999 and December 31, 2000 and alleged, among other things, violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. The plaintiffs alleged that the Company issued false and misleading statements and failed to disclose material facts concerning, among other things, the Company’s financial condition and that because of the issuance of false and misleading statements and/or failure to disclose material facts, the price of PSS World Medical, Inc. common stock was artificially inflated during the class period. The Court granted the plaintiff’s motion for class certification in November 2002. The parties signed a settlement agreement pursuant to which the Company has agreed to pay $6.75 million for the benefit of the class members, of which $6.5 million was covered by the Company’s insurance policy. The final settlement agreement was filed with the court on June 9, 2004 and became effective July 9, 2004.

The Company has been named as a defendant in a suit brought by three former and certain present employees of the Company, entitled Angione, et al. v. PSS World Medical, Inc., which was filed on or about June 4, 2002 in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Santa Ana Division. The court approved the transfer of venue, and the case is now pending in the United States Court for the Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville Division. The plaintiffs allege that the Company wrongfully classified its purchasers, operations leader trainees, and accounts receivable representatives as exempt from the overtime requirements imposed by the Fair Labor Standards Act and the California Wage Orders, and they seek to recover back pay, interest, costs of suit, declaratory and injunctive relief, and applicable statutory penalties. On February 21, 2003, the court conditionally allowed the case to proceed as a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act. An additional 59 plaintiffs opted into the proceeding, bringing the total number of plaintiffs to 62. Two of the three original named plaintiffs also brought, but subsequently have settled, individual claims for gender discrimination and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Pay Act of 1963. As a result of mediation in March 2004, the parties agreed on a framework for mediation or arbitration in October 2004 on the issue of the plaintiffs’ attorney’s fees. The attorney’s fee issue was resolved and the parties entered into negotiations for resolution of the plaintiffs’outstanding wage claims. The parties were able to reach agreement on the amount of wages to be paid to the plaintiffs. On November 5, 2004, the Court approved the $2.9 million settlement payment, which has been paid by the Company.

On February 8, 2005, the Company settled a lawsuit pursuant to which the opposing parties agreed to pay the Company $2.6 million to resolve all claims and counterclaims. The settlement agreement received court approval. Accordingly, during the three months ended April 1, 2005, the Company will record a $2.6 million gain, which will be offset by approximately $0.5 million of legal and professional fees and expenses incurred during this same period. The Company previously recorded approximately $1.7 million in legal and professional fees and expenses from the inception of the case in July 2003 through December 31, 2004.

22

The Company is also a party to various other legal and administrative proceedings and claims arising in the normal course of business. While any litigation contains an element of uncertainty, the Company, after consultation with outside legal counsel, believes that the outcome of such other proceedings or claims which are pending or known to be threatened will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, liquidity, or results of operations.

The Company has various insurance policies, including product liability insurance, covering risks and in amounts it considers adequate. In many cases in which the Company has been sued in connection with products manufactured by others, the Company is provided indemnification by the manufacturer. There can be no assurance that the insurance coverage maintained by the Company is sufficient or will be available in adequate amounts or at a reasonable cost, or that indemnification agreements will provide adequate protection for the Company.

Commitments and Other Contingencies

The Company has employment agreements with certain executive officers which provide that in the event of their termination or resignation, under certain conditions, the Company may be required to pay severance to the executive officers in amounts ranging from one-fourth to two times their base salary and target annual bonus. In the event that a termination or resignation follows or is in connection with a change in control, the Company may be required to pay severance to the executive officers in amounts ranging from three-fourths to three times their base salary and target annual bonus. The Company may also be required to continue welfare benefit plan coverage for the executive officers following a termination or resignation for a period ranging from three months to three years.

If the Physician Business or the Elder Care Business were to terminate a contract with a private label vendor for any reason, the Company may be required to purchase the remaining inventory of private label products from the vendor, provided that, in no event would the Company be required to purchase quantities of such products which exceed the aggregate amount of such products ordered by the Company in the ninety day period immediately preceding the date of termination. As of December 31, 2004, the Company has not terminated any contracts with a private label vendor that had a material impact to the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

12.   DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

On September 26, 2002, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted a plan to dispose of the Imaging Business, reflecting a strategic decision by management to focus the Company’s efforts on its Physician and Elder Care Businesses, which offer attractive opportunities for growth and profitability.

On November 18, 2002, the Company completed the sale of DI to Imaging Acquisition Corporation (the “Buyer”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Platinum Equity, LLC, a private equity firm (“Platinum”). The sale was completed pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 28, 2002, among the Company, the Buyer, and Platinum, as amended on November 18, 2002 (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”). Under the Stock Purchase Agreement, the purchase price was $45,000 less (i) an adjustment for any change in net asset value from the initial net asset value target date and (ii) an adjustment for any change in the net cash from the initial net cash target date (the “Purchase Price”). In connection with the closing of the transaction, the Company and the Buyer entered into a transitional services agreement, pursuant to which the Company provided certain reimbursable services to the Buyer for a period of one year. This agreement terminated during fiscal year 2004. The costs incurred related to providing services under the transition services agreement were included in general and administrative expenses and the reimbursement for these expenses were included in other income in the accompanying statements of operations. During the three and nine months ended December 31, 2003, the Company recognized approximately $200 and $2,950, respectively, of other income related to the transition services agreement.

The results of operations of the Imaging Business and the estimated loss on disposal have been classified as “discontinued operations” in accordance with SFAS 144. The estimated loss on disposal, which was subject to change based on the final Purchase Price adjustments, was finalized during the three months ended June 30, 2004. The accompanying financial statements have been restated to conform to discontinued operations treatment for all historical periods presented.

23

On March 14, 2003, the Company received a letter from the Buyer claiming a purchase price adjustment of $32,257. The claimed purchase price adjustment was based on an accounting of the net asset statement as of the closing date, which was delivered to the Buyer in January 2003. Pursuant to the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement, the matter was referred to an independent accounting firm of national reputation for arbitration. Subsequent to March 14, 2003, the Buyer provided an adjusted claim to the arbitrator claiming a purchase price adjustment of $28,222. Of this amount, the arbitrator ruled in favor of the Buyer for a purchase price adjustment of $1,821. During the settlement process, management estimated the net asset adjustment based on available information and revised its estimate on a quarterly basis, if needed. Management’s estimated net asset adjustment of approximately $2,000 was recorded in prior periods. The pretax loss on disposal of discontinued operations recorded during the nine months ended December 31, 2004 represented (i) a true-up of management’s estimated net asset adjustment to the actual net asset adjustment as indicated in the arbitrator’s final ruling of $1,821, (ii) interest of $458, and (iii) legal and professional fees of $471, offset by (iv) a reversal of the remaining accrued loss on disposal of $489 in order to true-up management’s estimated legal and professional fees based on actual payments made.

The gain (loss) on disposal of discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 is as follows:

The cash proceeds received from the Buyer during fiscal year 2003 were reduced by approximately $10,219 for transaction and settlement costs. A cash payment of approximately $4,279 was made to the Buyer during the three months ended October 1, 2004.

13.   SUBSEQUENT EVENT

PSS World Medical, Inc., and its wholly owned subsidiary, World Med Shared Services, Inc. (collectively the “Company”), entered into a Sourcing Services Agreement, dated as of January 19, 2005 (the “Agreement”), with Tiger Specialty Sourcing Limited, Tiger Shanghai Specialty Sourcing Co. Ltd., Mark Engle, Elaine Fong, and Dr. Gao Zhan (collectively “Tiger Medical”). Subject to the terms and conditions of the Agreement, the Company has agreed to purchase certain medical and other products from Chinese suppliers and manufacturers using the exclusive sourcing services of Tiger Medical.

Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the Company made an initial equity investment of $1.0 million in Tiger Medical on January 25, 2005. In return for its initial equity investment, the Company appointed two individuals to serve on the five-member board of directors of both Tiger Specialty Sourcing Limited and Tiger Shanghai Specialty Sourcing Co. Ltd. The Company ultimately has the right to increase its ownership interest in Tiger Medical to 100% during fiscal years 2006 through 2009 if certain performance targets are achieved. The total purchase price to be paid by the Company for 100% ownership of Tiger Medical ranges between $1.0 million and $32.5 million and depends on the satisfaction of certain performance targets. Any investments made by the Company during fiscal years 2006 through 2008 will be credited against the final purchase price to be paid by the Company. If at any time during the term of the Agreement, the Company achieves the agreed-upon cost of goods savings target in any twelve-month period prior to achieving the agreed-upon sales target, then either party has the right to trigger an early buy-out of Tiger Medical by the Company.

24

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
PSS World Medical, Inc.:

We have reviewed the consolidated balance sheet of PSS World Medical, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004, the related consolidated statements of operations for the three-month and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related statements of cash flows for nine-month periods ended December 31, 2004 and 2003. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of PSS World Medical, Inc. and subsidiaries as of April 2, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated June 7, 2004, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. Our report referred to the adoption of Emerging Issues Task Force No. 02-16, Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor, effective November 21, 2002, and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 145, Rescission of FASB Statements No.4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections, effective March 29, 2003. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of April 2, 2004, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

KPMG LLP

Jacksonville, Florida
February 7, 2005