SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003
or
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 000-50039
OLD DOMINION ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
VIRGINIA |
23-7048405 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
4201 Dominion Boulevard, Glen Allen, Virginia |
23060 | |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
(Zip Code) |
(804) 747-0592
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes ¨ No x
The Registrant is a membership corporation and has no authorized or outstanding equity securities.
OLD DOMINION ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE
Page Number | ||||
PART I. Financial Information |
||||
Item 1. |
Financial Statements |
|||
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets March 31, 2003 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2002 |
3 | |||
4 | ||||
4 | ||||
5 | ||||
6 | ||||
Item 2. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
8 | ||
Item 3. |
14 | |||
Item 4. |
14 | |||
PART II. Other Information |
||||
Item 1. |
15 | |||
Item 5. |
15 | |||
Item 6. |
15 | |||
16 |
2
OLD DOMINION ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
March 31, 2003 |
December 31, 2002* |
|||||||
(in thousands) |
||||||||
ASSETS: |
(unaudited) |
|||||||
Electric Plant: |
||||||||
In service |
$ |
940,237 |
|
$ |
926,805 |
| ||
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
(374,804 |
) |
|
(364,653 |
) | ||
|
565,433 |
|
|
562,152 |
| |||
Nuclear fuel, at amortized cost |
|
3,369 |
|
|
4,226 |
| ||
Construction work in progress |
|
409,601 |
|
|
371,708 |
| ||
Net Electric Plant |
|
978,403 |
|
|
938,086 |
| ||
Investments: |
||||||||
Nuclear decommissioning trust |
|
56,447 |
|
|
56,684 |
| ||
Lease deposits |
|
143,877 |
|
|
143,598 |
| ||
Other |
|
71,133 |
|
|
77,936 |
| ||
Total Investments |
|
271,457 |
|
|
278,218 |
| ||
Current Assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
32,697 |
|
|
67,829 |
| ||
Receivables |
|
53,455 |
|
|
54,566 |
| ||
Fuel, materials and supplies, at average cost |
|
11,047 |
|
|
11,467 |
| ||
Prepayments |
|
2,229 |
|
|
2,154 |
| ||
Deferred energy |
|
13,222 |
|
|
|
| ||
Total Current Assets |
|
112,650 |
|
|
136,016 |
| ||
Deferred Charges: |
||||||||
Regulatory assets |
|
64,637 |
|
|
65,883 |
| ||
Other |
|
12,342 |
|
|
11,856 |
| ||
Total Deferred Charges |
|
76,979 |
|
|
77,739 |
| ||
Total Assets |
$ |
1,439,489 |
|
$ |
1,430,059 |
| ||
CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES: |
||||||||
Capitalization: |
||||||||
Patronage capital |
$ |
238,250 |
|
$ |
235,534 |
| ||
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) |
|
(431 |
) |
|
(10,911 |
) | ||
Long-term debt |
|
751,351 |
|
|
750,682 |
| ||
Total Capitalization |
|
989,170 |
|
|
975,305 |
| ||
Current Liabilities: |
||||||||
Long-term debt due within one year |
|
11,913 |
|
|
11,913 |
| ||
Accounts payable |
|
64,259 |
|
|
75,333 |
| ||
Accounts payable members |
|
58,101 |
|
|
59,944 |
| ||
Accrued expenses |
|
47,674 |
|
|
35,249 |
| ||
Deferred energy |
|
|
|
|
3,039 |
| ||
Deferred revenue |
|
5,584 |
|
|
10,278 |
| ||
Total Current Liabilities |
|
187,531 |
|
|
195,756 |
| ||
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities |
||||||||
Asset retirement obligation |
|
39,560 |
|
|
|
| ||
Decommissioning reserve |
|
|
|
|
56,684 |
| ||
Obligations under long-term leases |
|
146,744 |
|
|
146,465 |
| ||
Regulatory liabilities |
|
29,271 |
|
|
1,303 |
| ||
Other |
|
47,213 |
|
|
54,546 |
| ||
Total Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities |
|
262,788 |
|
|
258,998 |
| ||
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Capitalization and Liabilities |
$ |
1,439,489 |
|
$ |
1,430,059 |
| ||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
* The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2002, has been taken from the audited financial statements at that date, but does not include all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles.
3
OLD DOMINION ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF REVENUES,
EXPENSES AND PATRONAGE CAPITAL (UNAUDITED)
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
||||||||
(in thousands) |
|||||||||
Operating Revenues |
$ |
143,917 |
|
$ |
132,247 |
| |||
Operating Expenses: |
|||||||||
Fuel |
|
13,269 |
|
|
13,596 |
| |||
Purchased power |
|
109,672 |
|
|
64,607 |
| |||
Deferred energy |
|
(16,261 |
) |
|
22,366 |
| |||
Operations and maintenance |
|
15,385 |
|
|
8,697 |
| |||
Administrative and general |
|
5,181 |
|
|
4,667 |
| |||
Depreciation, amortization and decommissioning |
|
5,438 |
|
|
5,841 |
| |||
Amortization of regulatory liability, net |
|
(4,354 |
) |
|
929 |
| |||
Taxes other than income taxes |
|
837 |
|
|
865 |
| |||
Accretion |
|
517 |
|
|
|
| |||
Total Operating Expenses |
|
129,684 |
|
|
121,568 |
| |||
Operating Margin |
|
14,233 |
|
|
10,679 |
| |||
Other Income/(Expense), net |
|
(20 |
) |
|
805 |
| |||
Investment Income |
|
145 |
|
|
1,454 |
| |||
Interest Charges, net |
|
(8,371 |
) |
|
(10,422 |
) | |||
Net Margin Before Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle |
|
5,987 |
|
|
2,516 |
| |||
Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle |
|
(3,271 |
) |
|
|
| |||
Net Margin After Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle |
|
2,716 |
|
|
2,516 |
| |||
Patronage Capital Beginning of Period |
|
235,534 |
|
|
225,537 |
| |||
Patronage Capital End of Period |
$ |
238,250 |
|
$ |
228,053 |
| |||
OLD DOMINION ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)
Three Months Ended March 31, |
||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||
(in thousands) |
||||||||
Net Margin |
$ |
2,716 |
|
$ |
2,516 |
| ||
Other Comprehensive (Loss)/Income: |
||||||||
Unrealized (loss)/gain on investments |
|
|
|
|
(526 |
) | ||
Unrealized (loss)/gain on derivative contracts |
|
(10,480 |
) |
|
|
| ||
Other comprehensive (loss)/income |
|
(10,480 |
) |
|
(526 |
) | ||
Comprehensive (Loss)/Income |
$ |
(7,764 |
) |
$ |
1,990 |
| ||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements. |
4
OLD DOMINION ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW (UNAUDITED)
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
||||||||
(in thousands) |
|||||||||
Operating Activities: |
|||||||||
Net Margin |
$ |
2,716 |
|
$ |
2,516 |
| |||
Adjustments to reconcile net margins to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|||||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
|
3,271 |
|
|
|
| |||
Depreciation, amortization and decommissioning |
|
5,438 |
|
|
5,841 |
| |||
Other non-cash charges |
|
1,801 |
|
|
2,473 |
| |||
Amortization of lease obligations |
|
2,372 |
|
|
2,467 |
| |||
Interest on lease deposits |
|
(2,263 |
) |
|
(2,419 |
) | |||
Change in current assets |
|
1,456 |
|
|
(12,070 |
) | |||
Change in deferred energy |
|
(16,261 |
) |
|
22,365 |
| |||
Change in current liabilities |
|
(32 |
) |
|
13,737 |
| |||
Change in regulatory assets and liabilities |
|
(4,540 |
) |
|
12,537 |
| |||
Deferred charges and credits |
|
3,421 |
|
|
(10,686 |
) | |||
Net Cash (Used for) Provided by Operating Activities |
|
(2,621 |
) |
|
36,761 |
| |||
Financing Activities: |
|||||||||
Retirement of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) | |||
Obligations under long-term leases |
|
(109 |
) |
|
(181 |
) | |||
Net Cash Used for Financing Activities |
|
(109 |
) |
|
(190 |
) | |||
Investing Activities: |
|||||||||
Lease deposits and other investments |
|
6,803 |
|
|
(27,023 |
) | |||
Electric plant additions |
|
(39,035 |
) |
|
(35,997 |
) | |||
Decommissioning fund deposits |
|
(170 |
) |
|
(170 |
) | |||
Net Cash Used for Investing Activities |
|
(32,402 |
) |
|
(63,190 |
) | |||
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
(35,132 |
) |
|
(26,619 |
) | |||
Cash and Cash Equivalents Beginning of Period |
|
67,829 |
|
|
77,981 |
| |||
Cash and Cash Equivalents End of Period |
$ |
32,697 |
|
$ |
51,362 |
| |||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
OLD DOMINION ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. | In the opinion of our management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of our consolidated financial position as of March 31, 2003, and our consolidated results of operations, comprehensive income, and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002. The consolidated results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2003, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in our 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
2. | We adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 143 Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations effective January 1, 2003. SFAS No. 143 requires legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets to be recognized at fair value when incurred and capitalized as part of the related long-lived asset. Over time, the liability is accreted to its present value each period, and the capitalized asset is depreciated over the useful life of the long-lived asset. SFAS No. 143 requires that any transition adjustment determined at adoption be recognized as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. |
SFAS No. 143 applies to the decommissioning of the North Anna Nuclear Power Station (North Anna) as well as certain asset retirement obligations at the Clover Power Station (Clover) and our diesel facilities. At December 31, 2002, we had recorded a liability for the decommissioning of North Anna of $56.7 million, which equaled the balance in our nuclear decommissioning trust fund. At January 1, 2003, our liability for the decommissioning of North Anna as well as our liabilities associated with Clover and the diesel facilities as calculated under SFAS No. 143 was $39.0 million. This liability was calculated using the present value of estimated future cash flows. We also recorded plant assets totaling $12.3 million and offsetting accumulated depreciation of $4.4 million. The majority, $28.8 million, of the difference between what was recorded prior to January 1, 2003 and the net amount recorded under SFAS No. 143 has been deferred as a regulatory liability. The remainder, $3.3 million, represents the cumulative effect of change in accounting principle. |
The following represents changes in our Asset Retirement Obligation for the three months ended March 31, 2003:
Three Months Ended |
|||
March 31, 2003 |
|||
(in thousands) |
|||
Decommissioning reserve |
$ 56,684 |
| |
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
(17,641 |
) | |
Asset retirement obligation at January 1, 2003 |
39,043 |
| |
Accretion of liability |
517 |
| |
Asset retirement obligation at March 31, 2003 |
$ 39,560 |
| |
Net margin for the three months ended March 31, 2002, or the twelve months ended December 31, 2002, would not have differed if this statement had been adopted as of January 1, 2002. |
3. | In December 1992, we entered into an agreement with Public Service Electric & Gas Company (PSE&G) to purchase 150 megawatts (MW) of capacity, consisting of 75 MW of intermediate or peaking capacity and 75 MW of base load capacity, as well as reserves and associated energy, through 2004. The agreement with PSE&G contains fixed capacity charges, including transmission charges, for the base, intermediate, and peaking capacity to be provided under the agreement. However, either party can apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) in some circumstances to recover changes in specified costs of providing services. If a change in rate occurs, the party adversely affected may terminate the agreement on one years notice. We may purchase the energy associated with the PSE&G capacity from PSE&G or other power suppliers. If purchased from PSE&G, the energy cost is based on PSE&Gs incremental cost above its own power supply requirements. |
In October 1997, we filed with FERC a complaint against PSE&G asserting that our agreement with PSE&G should be modified to conform to the restructuring of PJM Interconnection LLC (PJM). Under the PJM structure, we pay for the transmission of PSE&G power through the zonal rate we currently pay Conectiv Energy. On May 14, 1998, FERC ruled in our favor as part of its ruling on several cases relating to the restructuring of PJM, ordering PSE&G to remove all |
6
transmission costs from its rates for capacity and associated energy sold to us, effective April 1, 1998. PSE&G complied with the FERC order by virtue of a compliance filing submitted to FERC on June 15, 1998. On November 30, 2000, PSE&G filed with the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit a petition for review of FERCs orders in this matter. On July 12, 2002, the Court of Appeals vacated FERCs May 14, 1998 ruling and remanded all of these cases relating to the restructuring of PJM to FERC for further consideration. |
On December 19, 2002, FERC issued an order on remand reversing its May 14, 1998 generic PJM restructuring ruling. FERC noted that there was no evidence on record in the generic restructuring proceeding to demonstrate what, if any, unduly discriminatory effects could be attributable to our particular contract, but went on to state that we are free to present evidence based on the specifics of our contract with PSE&G under Section 206 of the Federal Power Act. On January 24, 2003, we filed an amended and renewed complaint against PSE&G with FERC, requesting that FERC reopen the proceeding regarding the matters raised by our October 1997 complaint. That initial complaint was dismissed by FERC in August 1998, based on FERCs generic PJM restructuring ruling that ruled in our favor. Our January 24, 2003 complaint renewal and amendment urges FERC to find that rate pancaking to us under our agreement with PSE&G is unlawful and eliminate this rate pancaking treatment effective April 1, 1998, forward. We also requested that FERC stay any payment obligation by us to PSE&G for surcharge amounts of pancaked rates (incurring charges from multiple transmission owners due to transmission across several systems) from April 1, 1998 through December 31, 2002. We received an invoice from PSE&G on January 22, 2003, for this surcharge amount of $26.2 million, plus $4.7 million in accumulated interest. |
On February 10, 2003, we informed PSE&G in writing that a payment obligation for any past amount under the 1992 agreements surcharge authority remains unauthorized and premature, until so ordered by FERC. On January 14, 2003, our board of directors approved the collection from our member distribution cooperatives of approximately $32.9 million including interest and related margin requirement beginning February 1, 2003, over 48 months, to cover this contingency. We are paying the amount of pancaked rates on a prospective basis, subject to protest and FERC action on our renewed and amended complaint. |
4. | On May 9, 2001, we entered into a master power purchase and sales agreement with Enron Power Marketing, Inc. (EPMI). Pursuant to transactions we entered into under this agreement, EPMI was obligated to deliver power to us through December 31, 2003. Following its filing for bankruptcy protection on December 2, 2001, EPMI ceased scheduling deliveries of power under the agreement beginning December 15, 2001. We then terminated the agreement. EPMI claims that a termination payment is due from us pursuant to the terms of the contract; however, we have disputed that obligation due to EPMIs fraudulent conduct. On December 11, 2002, EPMI filed an adversary proceeding against us in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York seeking to collect a $10.4 million termination payment. We moved to dismiss that action and to compel arbitration. On March 4, 2003, the Bankruptcy Court ordered the parties to take the dispute to nonbinding mediation. The adversary action is stayed pending the mediation. If it is ultimately determined that we owe any amounts to EPMI, such amounts are not expected to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flow due to our ability to collect such amounts through rates. |
5. | TEC Trading, Inc. (TEC Trading), which is owned by our member distribution cooperatives, was formed for the primary purpose of purchasing from us, to sell in the market, power that is not needed to meet the actual needs of our member distribution cooperatives, acquiring natural gas to supply our three combustion turbine facilities, and taking advantage of other power-related trading opportunities in the market, which will help lower our member distribution cooperatives costs. To fully participate in power and natural gas related markets, TEC Trading must maintain credit support sufficient to meet delivery and payment obligations associated with power and natural gas trades. To assist TEC Trading in providing this credit support, we have agreed to guarantee up to $42.5 million of TEC Tradings delivery and payment obligations associated with its power and natural gas trades. At March 31, 2003, we had guaranteed $0.5 million of obligations of TEC Trading and we guaranteed an additional $2.0 million in April, 2003, for a total of $2.5 million. During the three months ended March 31, 2003, we had sales to TEC Trading of $6.0 million and had charged administrative services fees to it of $3,000. There were no sales to TEC Trading during the three months ended March 31, 2002, nor were any administrative service fees charged to it during that period. |
6. | Subsequent event Effective April 30, 2003, our subsidiaries Marsh Run Generation, LLC and Louisa Generation, LLC were dissolved and their assets were transferred to us. |
7. | Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior years condensed consolidated financial statement to conform to the current years presentation. |
7
OLD DOMINION ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements regarding matters that could have an impact on our business, financial condition, and future operations. These statements, based on our expectations, assumptions, and estimates, are not guarantees of future performance or the occurence of any event and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. These risks, uncertainties, and other factors include, but are not limited to, general business conditions, increased competition in the electric utility industry, changes in our tax status, demand for energy, federal and state legislative and regulatory actions and legal and administrative proceedings, changes in and compliance with environmental laws and policies, weather conditions, the cost of commodities used in our industry, interest rates, future costs, and unanticipated changes in operating expenses and capital expenditures. Our actual results may vary materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements as a result of these and other factors. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which the statement is made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement or statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made even if new information becomes available or other events occur in the future.
Critical Accounting Policies
As of March 31, 2003, other than the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, there have been no significant changes with regard to our critical accounting policies as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002. The policies disclosed included the accounting for rate regulation and our margin stabilization plan.
On January 1, 2003, we adopted SFAS No. 143, which provides accounting requirements for the recognition and measurement of liabilities associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets. At March 31, 2003, our asset retirement obligations totaled $39.6 million, the majority of which relates to the decommissioning of our undivided ownership interest in the North Anna Nuclear Power Station (North Anna) as well as certain asset retirement obligations at the Clover Power Station (Clover) and our diesel facilities.
Asset retirement obligations are recognized at fair value as incurred and capitalized as part of the cost of the related tangible long-lived assets. In the absence of quoted market prices, we base our estimates of the fair value of asset retirement obligations using present value techniques, involving discounted cash flow analysis. Measurement using these techniques is dependent upon many subjective factors, including the selection of discount and cost escalation rates, identification of planned retirement activities and related cost estimates and assertions of probability regarding the timing, nature and costs of these activities. We base inputs and assumptions on the best information available to us at the time the estimates are made. However, estimates of future cash flows are highly uncertain by nature and may vary significantly from actual results.
Results of Operations
Operating Revenues
Our operating revenues are derived from power sales to our members and non-members. Our sales to members include sales to our Class A members, which are our twelve member distribution cooperatives, and sales to our single Class B member, TEC Trading, Inc. (TEC Trading). Our operating revenues by type of purchaser for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, were as follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||
March 31, | ||||||
2003 |
2002 | |||||
(in thousands) | ||||||
Member revenues: |
||||||
Member distribution cooperatives |
$ |
136,185 |
$ |
131,841 | ||
TEC Trading |
|
6,009 |
|
| ||
Total member revenues |
|
142,194 |
|
131,841 | ||
Non-member revenues |
|
1,723 |
|
406 | ||
Total revenues |
$ |
143,917 |
$ |
132,247 | ||
Revenues from sales to our member distribution cooperatives are a function of our formulary rate for sales of power to our member distribution cooperatives and our member distribution cooperatives consumers requirements for power. Our formulary rate is based on our cost of service in meeting these requirements and consists of a demand rate, a base energy rate and a fuel factor adjustment rate. Revenue from sales to TEC Trading is made pursuant to our power sales contract with it.
Our power sales are comprised of two power products energy and capacity (also referred to as demand). Energy is the physical electricity delivered through transmission and distribution facilities to customers. We bill energy to each of our member and non-member customers based on the total megawatt-hours (MWh) delivered to them each month and, with respect to our member distribution cooperatives, charge them an amount based on the base energy rate and fuel factor adjustment rate. Because energy cannot be stored, we must have sufficient committed energy available to us for delivery to our member distribution cooperatives to meet their maximum energy needs at any time, with limited exceptions. This committed available energy is referred to as capacity. We use our generating facilities and rely on power purchase contracts to satisfy substantially all of our member distribution cooperatives capacity requirements. We bill capacity to each of our member distribution cooperatives monthly through our demand rate which is based on our budgeted capacity costs. The quantity billed to each member distribution cooperative is based on its requirement for energy during the hour of the month when the need for energy among all of the consumers in mainland Virginia or the Delmarva Peninsula, as applicable, is highest, measured in megawatts (MW).
8
Sales to Member Distribution Cooperatives
Our revenues from sales to our member distribution cooperatives by formulary rate component, energy sales to our member distribution cooperatives, and average costs to our member distribution cooperatives per MWh for the three months ended March 31, 2003, and 2002 were as follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||
2003 |
2002 | |||||
(in thousands) | ||||||
Revenues from sales to member distribution cooperatives: |
||||||
Base energy revenues |
$ |
49,455 |
$ |
43,326 | ||
Fuel factor adjustment revenues |
|
23,385 |
|
33,781 | ||
Total energy revenues |
|
72,840 |
|
77,107 | ||
Demand (capacity) revenues |
|
63,345 |
|
54,734 | ||
Total revenues from sales to member distribution cooperatives |
$ |
136,185 |
$ |
131,841 | ||
Energy sales to member distribution cooperatives (in MWh) |
|
2,840,504 |
|
2,398,999 | ||
Average costs to member distribution cooperatives (per MWh)(1) |
$ |
47.94 |
$ |
54.96 |
(1) | Our average costs to member distribution cooperatives is based on the blended cost of power from all of our power supply resources. |
Three factors significantly affect our member distribution cooperatives consumers requirements for power:
| growth in the number of consumers, |
| growth in consumers requirements for power, and |
| weather fluctuations. |
Weather affects the demand for electricity. Relatively higher or lower temperatures tend to increase the demand for energy to use heating and air conditioning systems. Mild weather generally reduces the demand for energy because heating and air conditioning systems are operated less. Other factors affecting our member distribution cooperatives consumers demand for energy include the amount, size, and usage of electronics and machinery, and the expansion of operations among their commercial and industrial customers.
Total revenues from our member distribution cooperatives for the three months ended March 31, 2003, increased $4.3 million, or 3.3%, over the same period in 2002 as a result of increased sales of both capacity and energy and an increase in our average demand rate. Capacity sales in the first quarter of 2003, measured in MW, increased 11.3% and energy sales, measured in MWh, increased 18.4% over those realized in the first quarter of 2002. Sales volumes increased primarily as a result of unusually cold winter weather experienced by consumers of our member distribution cooperatives. Lower than normal temperatures created a greater requirement for power to operate heating systems.
Our average demand rate increased 4.0% in the first quarter of 2003 compared to the same period in 2002. The increase in our average demand rate resulted from an increase in the demand component of our formulary rate of approximately 5.0%, effective February 1, 2003, enacted to collect from our member distribution cooperatives transmission charges associated with our power purchase agreement with Public Service Electric & Gas Company (PSE&G). We anticipate that the increase in the demand component of our formulary rate will recover over 48 months a $32.9 million contingency we established to reflect a surcharge billed to us by PSE&G, and associated interest expense and margin requirement. Additionally, we anticipate that the revised demand component of our formulary rate will recover the amount of transmission costs that we are paying to PSE&G now until the termination of the contract in December 2004. We are making these payments under protest and subject to FERC action on this issue. See Legal Proceedings in Part II, Item 1.
The increase in total revenues attributable to a growth in sales volume was substantially offset by a decrease in the average energy rates that we charged in the first quarter of 2003 for power sold. Our average energy rate (including our base energy rate and our fuel factor adjustment rate) decreased 20.2% in the first quarter of 2003 compared to the same period in 2002 as a result of a drop in our average fuel factor adjustment rate. We reduced our fuel factor adjustment rate effective April 1, 2002, because the fuel
9
factor adjustment rate that had been in effect since April 1, 2001, had fully recovered our deferred energy balance at December 31, 2001, (an $18.2 million under-collection of energy costs) and had resulted in a $4.1 million over-collection of energy costs at March 31, 2002, and we anticipated that future energy costs would be adequately recovered with the lower fuel factor adjustment rate. We reduced our fuel factor adjustment rate again effective October 1, 2002, because our deferred energy balance at September 30, 2002, represented a $5.0 million over-collection of energy costs, and we again anticipated that future energy costs would be adequately recovered with the lower fuel factor adjustment rate. Our board of directors approved a change to our fuel factor adjustment rate, which resulted in an increase to our total energy rate (including our base energy rate and our fuel factor adjustment rate) of approximately 18.0% effective March 1, 2003. The increase in the fuel factor adjustment rate was necessary to recover higher than expected actual energy costs that we incurred in the first two months of 2003 and energy costs for the remainder of the year that we anticipate will be higher than the energy costs we originally budgeted for 2003. See Operating Expenses below.
Sales to TEC Trading. Sales to TEC Trading were $6.0 million in the first quarter of 2003 compared with no sales to it in the first quarter of 2002. Our sales to TEC Trading are primarily sales of excess energy. Energy sales in MWh to TEC Trading for the first quarter of 2003 were 104,000 MWh.
Sales to Non-Members. Sales to non-members consist of sales of excess purchased energy and sales of excess generated energy from Clover. We sell excess purchased energy to PJM Interconnection, LLC (PJM) under its rates for providing energy imbalance services or to TEC Trading. We sell excess energy from Clover to Virginia Power pursuant to the requirements of the Clover Operating Agreement. Non-member revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2003, were higher than in 2002 by $1.3 million, or 324.4%, primarily because of increased sales of excess purchased energy to PJM. Our non-members energy sales in MWh for the three months ended March 31, 2003, and 2002 were 39,884, and 17,912, respectively.
Operating Expenses
We supply our member distribution cooperatives power requirements, consisting of capacity requirements and energy requirements, through (1) our owned or leased interests in electric generating facilities, a 50% interest in Clover, an 11.6% interest in North Anna and ten auxiliary diesel generators, and (2) power purchases from third parties through power purchase contracts and forward, short-term and spot market energy purchases. Our energy supply for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, was as follows:
Three Months Ended |
||||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||
(in MWh or percentages) |
||||||||||
Generated: |
||||||||||
Clover |
802,393 |
27.0 |
% |
695,132 |
27.9 |
% | ||||
North Anna |
262,454 |
8.9 |
|
465,997 |
18.7 |
| ||||
Diesels |
271 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total generated |
1,065,118 |
35.9 |
|
1,161,129 |
46.6 |
| ||||
Purchased: |
||||||||||
Mainland Virginia area |
1,141,932 |
38.5 |
|
804,355 |
32.3 |
| ||||
Delmarva Peninsula area |
759,414 |
25.6 |
|
525,336 |
21.1 |
| ||||
Total purchased |
1,901,346 |
64.1 |
|
1,329,691 |
53.4 |
| ||||
Total available energy |
2,966,464 |
100.0 |
% |
2,490,820 |
100.0 |
% | ||||
Market forces influence the structure of new power supply contracts we enter into. To serve the Delmarva Peninsula, we rely on power purchase agreements to provide the capacity to meet our member distribution cooperatives capacity requirements. To meet our member distribution cooperatives energy requirements on the Delmarva Peninsula, we purchase energy from the market or utilize the PJM power pool when economical. In mainland Virginia, we satisfy the majority of our member distribution cooperatives capacity and energy requirements through our ownership interests in Clover and North Anna.
Base load generating facilities, particularly nuclear power plants such as North Anna, generally have relatively high fixed costs. Nuclear facilities operate with relatively low variable costs due to lower fuel costs and technological efficiencies. Owners of nuclear and other power plants incur the embedded fixed costs of these facilities whether or not the units operate. When either North Anna or Clover is off-line, we must purchase replacement energy from either Virginia Power, which is more costly, or the market, which may be more or less costly. As a result, our operating expenses, and consequently our rates to our member distribution cooperatives, are significantly affected by the operations of North Anna and Clover. The output of North Anna and Clover for the first quarter of 2003 and 2002 as a percentage of the maximum dependable capacity rating of the facilities was as follows:
10
North Anna |
Clover |
|||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, |
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|||||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||
Unit 1 |
52.4 |
% |
101.3 |
% |
94.0 |
% |
59.9 |
% | ||||
Unit 2 |
61.4 |
|
100.7 |
|
76.2 |
|
87.5 |
| ||||
Combined |
56.9 |
|
101.0 |
|
85.1 |
|
73.7 |
|
North Anna. North Anna Unit 1 began an outage for a scheduled refueling and to replace the reactor vessel head of the unit on February 23, 2003. The unit returned to service on April 18, 2003. North Anna Unit 2 began a scheduled refueling outage on September 8, 2002. After the outage began, the reactor vessel head was replaced and the unit was returned to service on February 2, 2003. See also our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, for a discussion of the replacement of the reactor vessel heads at North Anna. There were no maintenance outages at North Anna during the first quarter of 2002.
Clover. Clover Unit 1 experienced only minor unscheduled outages during the first quarter of 2003. In 2002, Unit 1 was removed from service on March 1, 2002, for a 54-day scheduled maintenance outage. Unit 1 also experienced two minor unscheduled outages during the first quarter of 2002. Clover Unit 2 was removed from service on March 14, 2003, for a 35-day scheduled maintenance outage. Unit 2 also experienced minor unscheduled outages during the first quarter of 2003 and 2002.
The components of our operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, were as follows:
Three Months Ended March 31, | |||||||
2003 |
2002 | ||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||
Fuel |
$ |
13,269 |
|
$ |
13,596 | ||
Purchased power |
|
109,672 |
|
|
64,607 | ||
Deferred energy |
|
(16,261 |
) |
|
22,366 | ||
Operations and maintenance |
|
15,385 |
|
|
8,697 | ||
Administrative and general |
|
5,181 |
|
|
4,667 | ||
Depreciation, amortization and decommissioning |
|
5,438 |
|
|
5,841 | ||
Amortization of regulatory liability, net |
|
(4,354 |
) |
|
929 | ||
Taxes, other than income taxes |
|
837 |
|
|
865 | ||
Accretion |
|
517 |
|
|
| ||
Total operating expenses |
$ |
129,684 |
|
$ |
121,568 | ||
Aggregate operating expenses for the first quarter of 2003 increased $8.1 million, or 6.7%, over the same period in 2002 because of an increase in purchased power expense and operation and maintenance expense, partially offset by a decrease in deferred energy expense and the amortization of regulatory liability. Purchased power expense increased $45.0 million, or 69.8%, as a result of increased purchases of energy from the market to supply our member distribution cooperatives requirements during unusually cold winter weather during January and February 2003 and a reduction in the available capacity at North Anna. This resulted in a greater dependence on purchased power to meet our power needs for the first quarter of 2003. In addition, the average cost of the power we purchased increased 18.7% in the first quarter of 2003 primarily as a result of increases in the price of natural gas and the resulting impact on the energy market.
At March 31, 2003, we had an under-collected deferred energy balance of $13.2 million, which we anticipate will be fully collected through rates by the end of 2003. Deferred energy expense decreased $38.6 million, or was 172.7% lower in the first quarter of 2003 than in the first quarter of 2002, due to an under-collection of our energy costs during that period compared to an over-collection of energy costs in the first quarter of 2002.
Operations and maintenance expense increased in the first quarter of 2003 by $6.7 million or 76.9%, as compared to the first quarter of 2002, due to costs incurred for the replacement of the reactor vessel heads at North Anna. The increased operations and maintenance expense was partially offset by the amortization of a regulatory liability as the result of the collection of additional amounts from our member distribution cooperatives in 2002 to help mitigate the cost in 2003 of the North Anna reactor vessel heads replacement.
11
Other Items
Other Income/(Expense), net. The major components of our other income/(expense), net for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002 were as follows:
Three Months Ended March 31, |
||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||
(in thousands) |
||||||||
Gain on sale of investments |
$ |
5 |
|
$ |
90 |
| ||
Reimbursement of prior costs |
|
|
|
|
725 |
| ||
Donations and other |
|
(25 |
) |
|
(10 |
) | ||
Total Other Income/(Expense), net |
$ |
(20 |
) |
$ |
805 |
| ||
Other income/(expense), net decreased in the first quarter of 2003 by $0.8 million, or 102.5%, as compared to the first quarter of 2002 mainly due to a reduction in gains on the sale of investments and the reimbursement in 2002 of previously incurred development costs related to our Rock Springs facility.
Investment Income. Investment income decreased $1.3 million, or 90.0%, in the first quarter of 2003 as compared to the same period in 2002 as a result of a significant decrease in our average balance of investments-other, and cash and cash equivalents, and in the interest rates earned on our investments and cash equivalents. These investments were used during 2002 and 2003 to continue funding the development and construction of our three combustion turbine facilities.
Interest Charges, net. The primary factors affecting our interest expense are scheduled payments of principal on our indebtedness, prepayments of indebtedness relating to the Strategic Plan Initiative, issuance of new indebtedness, and capitalized interest.
The major components of interest charges, net for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, were as follows:
Three Months Ended March 31, |
||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||
(in thousands) |
||||||||
Interest expense on long-term debt |
$ |
(12,886 |
) |
$ |
(12,542 |
) | ||
Other |
|
(693 |
) |
|
(34 |
) | ||
Total Interest Charges |
|
(13,579 |
) |
|
(12,576 |
) | ||
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction |
|
5,208 |
|
|
2,154 |
| ||
Interest Charges, net |
$ |
(8,371 |
) |
$ |
(10,422 |
) | ||
Interest charges, net decreased in 2003 by $2.1 million, or 19.7%, as compared to the same period in 2002 due to an increase in the amount of capitalized interest relating to the development and construction of our three combustion turbine facilities. We began capitalizing interest on the Rock Springs and Louisa facilities in October 2001 and January 2002, respectively. Capitalized interest is computed monthly using an interest rate, which reflects our embedded cost of indebtedness, multiplied by our investment in projects under construction. Other interest increased due to an amount in dispute with PSE&G. See Legal Proceedings in Part II, Item 1.
Net Margin. Our net margin, which is a function of our interest charges, increased $0.2 million, or 8.0%, in the first quarter of 2003 as compared to the same period in 2002, due to the $1.0 million increase in our total interest charges.
Financial Condition
The principal changes in our financial condition from December 31, 2002 to March 31, 2003, were caused by increases in construction work in progress, changes in deferred energy, and adjustments related to the adoption of SFAS No. 143. The increase in construction work in progress of $37.9 million, or 10.2%, is primarily due to payments for construction of our three combustion turbine facilities and the purchase of pollution control facilities at Clover. Our deferred energy balance represents the net under- or over-collection of energy costs as of the end of the reporting period. These amounts are charged to or recovered from our member
12
distribution cooperatives in subsequent periods. The deferred energy balance changed from a $3.0 million liability (over-collection of costs) at December 31, 2002, to a $13.2 million asset (under-collection of costs) at March 31, 2003 and is a result of higher energy costs incurred in the first quarter of 2003 that were not recovered through our base energy rate and fuel factor adjustment.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Operations. Historically, our operating cash flows have been sufficient to meet our short- and long-term capital expenditures related to our generating facilities, our debt service requirements, and our ordinary business operations. Our cash needs exceeded our cash flows from operating activities by $2.6 million during the first quarter of 2003. Our operating activities provided excess cash flow of $36.8 million during the first quarter of 2002. Operating activities for the first three months of 2003 were affected primarily by changes between periods in our deferred energy account and the funding of construction and development expenses related to our combustion turbine facilities.
Financing Activities. In addition to liquidity from our operating activities, we maintain committed lines of credit to cover short-term funding needs. Currently, we have short-term committed variable rate lines of credit in an aggregate amount of $235.0 million. Of this amount, $95.0 million is available for general working capital purposes and $140.0 million is available for capital expenditures related to our generating facilities, including the development and construction of our three combustion turbine facilities.
At March 31, 2003, and 2002, we had no short-term borrowings or letters of credit outstanding under any of these arrangements. We expect the working capital lines of credit to be renewed as they expire. We expect the construction-related lines of credit to be renewed until no longer necessary for the development and construction of the combustion turbine facilities.
To fully participate in power-related markets, TEC Trading will be required to maintain credit support sufficient to meet delivery and payment obligations associated with power and natural gas trades. To assist TEC Trading in providing this credit support, we have agreed to guarantee up to $42.5 million of TEC Tradings delivery and payment obligations associated with its power trades. At March 31, 2003, we had guaranteed $0.5 million of obligations of TEC Trading and we guaranteed an additional $2.0 million in April 2003, for a total of $2.5 million.
Investing Activities. Investing activities in the first quarter of 2003 consisted primarily of expenditures for our three combustion turbine facilities and additions to investments.
Competition and Changing Regulations
All of the customers of our Delaware and Maryland member distribution cooperatives, and of Northern Virginia Electric Cooperative and Rappahannock Electric Cooperative in Virginia, were free to choose an alternative power supplier as of March 31, 2003. Additionally, as of April 1, 2003, the customers of our Shenandoah Valley Electric Cooperative in Virginia, are now free to choose an alternative power supplier. These five member distribution cooperatives accounted for 75.6% of our capacity requirements in 2002. As of May 9, 2003, none of the customers of these member distribution cooperatives had chosen an alternative power supplier and no alternative power suppliers were registered to provide power to customers of our member distribution cooperatives.
13
OLD DOMINION ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE
DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
No material changes occurred in our exposure to market risk during the first quarter of 2003.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
Our management, including the President and Chief Executive Officer, and Senior Vice President Accounting and Finance, the Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 within 90 days of this report. Based upon that evaluation, the President and Chief Executive Officer, and Senior Vice President Accounting and Finance, the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that all material information required to be filed in this report has been made known to them in a timely matter. We have established a Disclosure Assessment Committee comprised of members from senior and middle management to assist in this evaluation.
(b) Changes in Internal Controls.
There have been no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect such controls.
14
OLD DOMINION ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE
No material developments have occurred in our legal proceedings with PSE&G and Enron Power Marketing, Inc. since the filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002. Other than certain legal proceedings arising out of the ordinary course of business, which management believes will not have a material adverse impact on our results of operations or financial condition, there is no other litigation pending or threatened against us.
We expect to receive all necessary local building permits to begin construction of our Marsh Run facility in mid-2003 and we expect that the facility will be available for commercial operation in the second quarter of 2004.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) | Exhibits |
99.1 Certification of Jackson E. Reasor
99.2 Certification of Daniel M. Walker
(b) | Reports on Form 8-K. |
The Registrant filed no reports on Form 8-K during the quarter ended March 31, 2003.
15
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
OLD DOMINION ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE | ||
Registrant | ||
Date: May 15, 2003 |
/s/ DANIEL M. WALKER | |
Daniel M. Walker | ||
Senior Vice President Accounting and Finance |
16
OLD DOMINION ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Jackson E. Reasor, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Old Dominion Electric Cooperative; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; |
4. | The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: |
a) | designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; |
b) | evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and |
c) | presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; |
5. | The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): |
a) | all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
b) | any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and |
6. | The registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. |
Date: May 15, 2003
/s/ JACKSON E. REASOR
Jackson E. Reasor
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
17
OLD DOMINION ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Daniel M. Walker, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Old Dominion Electric Cooperative; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; |
4. | The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: |
a) | designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; |
b) | evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and |
c) | presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; |
5. | The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): |
d) | all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
e) | any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and |
6. | The registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. |
Date: May 15, 2003
/s/ DANIEL M. WALKER
Daniel M. Walker
Senior Vice President Accounting and Finance
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
18
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit Number |
Description of Exhibit |
Page Number | ||
99.1 |
Certification of Jackson E. Reasor |
20 | ||
99.2 |
Certification of Daniel M. Walker |
21 |
19