U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
[X]
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)[ ]
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File No. 0-23242
WEBCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Oklahoma
73-1097133
(State
or other jurisdiction
(I.R.S.
Employer
of incorporation or
organization)
Identification Number)
9101 West 21st Street
Sand Springs, Oklahoma 74063
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code - (918) 241-1000
Common Stock, par value $.01
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ X ]
As of September 30, 2001, the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $5,796,000.
On September 30, 2001, the number of shares outstanding of the registrant's common stock, $.01 par value, was 7,073,723 shares.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: Portions of the Proxy Statement for the registrant's 2001 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Items 10, 11, 12 and 13 of Part III of this Form 10-K.
WEBCO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
PART I
Item 1. Business
3
Item 2. Properties
13
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
14
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security
Holders
14
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Stock and Related
Stockholder
Matters
15
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
15
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results
of
Operations
17
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
23
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on
Accounting and
Financial
Disclosure
41
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
41
Item 11. Executive Compensation
41
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
and
Management
41
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
41
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and
Reports on
Form 8-K
42
WEBCO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
FORM 10-K
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
General
Webco Industries, Inc., an Oklahoma corporation, was founded in 1969 by F. William Weber, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer.
Webco is a specialty manufacturer of high-quality carbon and stainless steel tubing products designed to industry and customer specifications. Webco's tubing products consist primarily of: heat exchanger tubing, carbon steel boiler tubing, stainless steel tube and pipe, and specialty carbon steel mechanical tubing for use in consumer durable and capital goods. Management believes that Webco is a domestic market leader in the manufacture of welded carbon steel heat exchanger and boiler tubing, and the leading supplier of stainless steel tubing for certain niche applications. The Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, Phillips & Johnston, Inc. ("P&J"), represents several manufacturers who produce various non-competing mechanical and specialty tubular products made from copper, brass, aluminum, stainless and carbon steel, among others. This access to other tubing products allows the Company to better serve its customers by offering a full range of tubing products. Through its QuikWater division, the Company markets a patented direct contact water heater for commercial and industrial applications. The Company has three production facilities in Oklahoma and Pennsylvania and five distribution facilities in Oklahoma, Texas, Illinois and Michigan, serving more than 1,100 customers throughout North America.Unless the context otherwise requires, the information contained in this report, and the terms "Webco" and the "Company" when used in this report, include Webco Industries, Inc. and its subsidiary, P&J, on a consolidated basis.
Industry Overview
Specialty tubing producers occupy a niche between the primary steel producers and customers who utilize precision tubing in the manufacture of products primarily for the capital goods and consumer durable industries. As contrasted with commodity pipe producers, specialty tube mills manufacture products which are engineered and tailored for more specialized and critical end-use applications.
The specialty tubing industry was once dominated by the major integrated steel producers. Over time, these integrated producers lost their competitive advantage and have largely withdrawn from this segment. In addition, the industry continues to undergo consolidation, as well as rationalization of less efficient producers. Despite the consolidation over the past several years, the industry continues to be highly fragmented and is currently comprised of independent producers that occupy relatively focused market niches.
The specialty tubing industry has been affected by several trends that are expected to continue over the next several years. First, customers increasing emphasis on just-in-time inventory methods has required tube producers to increase operating efficiencies to accommodate more frequent, but smaller sized orders, and has caused tube producers to place greater emphasis on inventory management and cost control. Second, customers desires to cut operating costs through the outsourcing of specific processing functions, such as specialty tube manufacturing, have created the opportunity for third-party tube producers to replace production from captive mills. Finally, the impacts of foreign steel producers on the U.S. markets have caused volatility in the price of finished goods and the cost of steel sheet coil, the principal raw material used in the manufacture of tubing products.
MANUFACTURING TUBING PROCESSES
Manufactured Products
Electric Resistance Carbon Steel Weld Process: The Company maintains inventories of carbon steel sheet coils from which it manufactures tubing using electric resistance welding. This steel is in the form of a continuous sheet, typically 48 to 60 inches wide, between .049 and .500 inches thick, and rolled into 15 to 20 ton coils.
All customer orders for manufactured products are entered into a computerized order entry system, and the appropriate steel coil inventory is then selected and scheduled for processing in accordance with the customers delivery date and product specifications. The Company attempts to maximize efficiency by combining orders to optimize size rollings.
The manufacturing cycle begins with the slitting of wide coils into narrower bands. The outside diameter of the tube to be produced determines the width of the slit band. Steel coils over .180 inches thick used at the Sand Springs facility are slit to pre-designated widths by outside vendors. Steel coils less than .180 inches thick in Sand Springs and substantially all coils in Oil City are slit in each facility using Company equipment.
Conversion from slit band to carbon and alloy tubes is accomplished by (i) continuously roll forming into the desired tubular diameter; (ii) continuously welding the edges; and (iii) cutting to approximate finished length or multiples thereof. After the tube has been welded and depending upon product specifications, it may be moved to three further processing stations for annealing (heat treatment through an atmospherically controlled roller hearth furnace), straightening through rotary straighteners, and finishing (i.e., cut-to-length, non-destructive test, stencil, oil coat and package). The Company has stringent quality control standards in place at each stage of the manufacturing process.
This process produces welded heat exchanger tubing, boiler tubing, mechanical tubing and hollows (the raw material for the cold drawing process, which does not go through the finishing process). Hollows are primarily for specific cold draw orders, however, smaller amounts are produced for inventory.
Carbon Steel Cold Drawing Process: The Company maintains inventories of tubing hollows, which is raw material for the cold drawing process. Most of this tubing is manufactured by the Companys own weld tube mills. The Company currently offers precision, made-to-order cold drawn products from .250 inch to .375 inch in wall thickness for mechanical tubing and a limited amount of heat exchanger and boiler tubing. Cold drawing permits greater flexibility and precision (as compared to the weld process) in meeting customer specifications of tube diameters, wall thickness and other characteristics.
Cold drawing orders are entered into a computerized order entry system. Raw materials are selected to optimize yields and efficiency and meet the customers specifications and required delivery schedule. After the proper material has been selected for each specific order, it is cut to the desired length. The tube is then (i) pickled and lubricated through a series of tanks, (ii) pointed to taper the tube end, and (iii) cold drawn (cold reduction of outside diameter and inside diameter and elongation of tube). After the cold drawn tube has been manufactured to finished size, it is moved to three further processing stations for annealing, straightening and finishing.
Welded Stainless Tube Process: The manufacturing cycle for the stainless steel weld mill operations begins with the receipt by the Company of stainless steel coils slit to a pre-designated width by the vendor.
Customer orders are entered into the computerized order entry system. Slit coils are selected and fed into the stainless weld mills to be formed into a tubular shape and welded by an automated gas or laser welding process. After welding, the tube is annealed, cooled, straightened, stenciled, non-destructively tested, cut to length and packaged for shipment. For some special customer requirements, the tubing is coiled to lengths up to 20,000 feet. Most of the processing is performed in a continuous operation.
Stainless processing provides air-cooled heat exchanger tubing, instrumentation tubing and small diameter stainless pipe. The majority of stainless products are also made-to-order.
Other Tubing Products
The Company either outsources the fabrication of its Other Tubing Products or performs value added processing, such as cutting to length and end finishing the product, using owned equipment. Highly specialized and technical applications are generally outsourced. Other Tubing Products consist of tubular goods made of stainless steel, carbon steel, copper, brass, aluminum, and surgical steel purchased from other manufacturers.
QuikWater
QuikWater maintains a sales and engineering office in Sand Springs, Oklahoma and outsources the fabrication of the units to a related party vendor. All units are built to the Company's and its customers specifications. The Company supplies all of the required components based upon the specific size and model of the unit. Once completed, the unit is fully tested and then shipped to the customer's site where it is installed by the customer or a Company representative.
Tubing Facilities
The Company has three manufacturing facilities for producing carbon or stainless steel tubing products. The largest facility is located in Sand Springs, Oklahoma, which produces a wide range of carbon steel tubing products. This facility has been in operation since the Company began in 1969. The Company also has a facility in Oil City, Pennsylvania, which produces primarily boiler and as-welded mechanical carbon steel tubing products. The third facility in Mannford, Oklahoma produces stainless steel tubing products. The Company completed its expansion in Oil City during the third quarter of fiscal 2001. The additional 36,000 tons of welded capacity will create company-wide additional capacity for its welded carbon steel heat exchanger and boiler tubing and for its welded and cold drawn mechanical OEM tubing markets.
The following table sets forth the processing and other techniques performed at Webco's facilities:
Manufacturing |
Distribution l |
||||||||
Sand |
Oil |
Sand |
Grand |
Glen |
|||||
Springs, |
City, |
Mannford, |
Springs, |
Nederland, |
Lyndon, |
Rapids, |
Ellyn, |
||
Okla. |
Penn. |
Okla. |
Okla. |
Tx. |
Illinois |
Mich. |
Ill. |
||
Cold Drawing | X |
X |
|||||||
Slitting | X |
X |
|||||||
Welding | X |
X |
X |
||||||
Annealing | X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
||||
Straightening | X |
X |
X |
||||||
Cut-to-Length | X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
Integral Finning | X |
||||||||
Electronic Non- | |||||||||
Destructive Testing: | |||||||||
Eddy Current | X |
X |
X |
||||||
Flux Leakage | X |
||||||||
Ultra-Sonic | X |
X |
|||||||
Hydro-Static Testing | X |
X |
X |
||||||
Stenciling | X |
X |
X |
||||||
Bending | X |
X |
X |
||||||
Bar Coding | X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
||
Computerized Shop | |||||||||
Floor Control | X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
||||
Metallurgical Lab & | |||||||||
Spectrometer | X |
||||||||
Statistical Process | |||||||||
Control | X |
X |
X |
INDUSTRY SEGMENTS
The Company has two reportable segments: Tubing Products and QuikWater, representing
the Companys two strategic business units offering different products. The Company
internally evaluates its business by facility, however, because of the similar economic
characteristics of the tubing operations, including the nature of products, production
processes and customers, those operations have been aggregated for segment reporting
purposes. See Footnote 11 to the financial statements for additional information regarding
segments.
PRODUCTS
Manufactured Tubing Products
Heat Exchanger Tubing: The Company is a full service distributor of heat exchanger tubing, offering a full spectrum of welded, cold drawn or seamless tubing through its distribution facilities in Oklahoma and Texas. Through its manufacturing facilities and sourcing partners, the Company can offer carbon and stainless steel, brass, copper and other metal heat exchanger tubes, which can be cut, bent and/or finned to customer specifications at the distribution warehouses. The Company believes that its manufacturing capabilities, in both carbon and stainless steel, provide a strategic advantage over its distribution competitors. The Company also believes that its distribution capabilities provide an additional advantage over its manufacturing competitors.
Heat exchangers generally fall into two broad categories; shell and tube, and air-cooled. Shell and tube heat exchangers are used to control temperatures or to recover waste heat in, among other things, power stations, petrochemical plants, and refineries. Air-cooled heat exchangers are used to dissipate heat generated by industrial processes in, among other things, gas compressor stations and petrochemical plants. The Companys products are suitable for both shell and tube and air-cooled heat exchangers.
The heat exchanger industry over the past two years has been impacted by low demand in the petrochemical industry and low cost foreign imports (including both raw coils and finished tubes and pipe), however, the industry did show signs of improvement over the later half of the fiscal year. The Company believes that its current production capacity and product offerings will enable it to better realize the benefits associated with improving demand in the steel heat exchanger market.
Carbon Steel Boiler Tubing: The Company produces welded carbon steel boiler tubing from both the Sand Springs, Oklahoma, and Oil City, Pennsylvania facilities. This capability enables the Company to cost-effectively serve this market throughout the continental United States and eastern Canada. The Company is a market leader in the manufacture of welded carbon steel boiler tubing.
The Companys products are used for the manufacture and maintenance of boiler systems for utilities, waste-heat recovery units, industrial and commercial facilities, and co-generation plants. While maintenance is an ongoing requirement, new boiler manufacturing generally depends on industrial plant expansion and construction of new energy production facilities.
Stainless Tubing: The Company serves five sub-markets within the small diameter welded stainless tubing category: instrumentation tubing, stainless pipe, mechanical tubing, heat exchanger tubing, and other specialty tubing. The end uses for these products include appliances, industrial plant piping systems, instruments for the petrochemical industry, and a variety of other capital goods applications. The Company is a small, niche producer, due to both product size and capacity constraints, but plans to continue an aggressive growth strategy in the above product lines.
The stainless pipe and tube industry over the last three years has been impacted by high levels of low cost foreign imports (including both raw coils and finished tubes and pipe), which have created historically low pricing and a highly competitive sales environment.
Mechanical Tubing: Mechanical tubing includes both as-welded and cold drawn tubing. Most of the products the Company manufactures from its cold draw processes are for mechanical tube applications. The end-uses for these products are very diverse and include hydraulic cylinders, automotive components, appliances, farm equipment, and a wide variety of consumer durable (such as bicycles and lawnmowers) and capital goods. The Company is a relatively small producer in this market, but continues to pursue opportunities for growth.
In conjunction with the increased capabilities of Mill 3 and the completed expansion in Oil City, the Company has targeted the mechanical tubing market as a growth area over the next several years. This market continues to undergo a major change in which final assembly manufacturers (automotive, appliance, etc.) outsource component parts and emphasize just-in-time inventory management to reduce production costs. Webco believes that this market, which is largely comprised of original equipment manufacturers ("OEMs"), provides an opportunity for the Company to gain market share by utilizing its technological capabilities to offer superior quality, on-time delivery, customer service, and customized products at competitive prices.
Other Tubing Products
The Company sells a variety of other tubing products, primarily through its
subsidiary, P&J. Other Tubing Products consist of tubular goods made of stainless and
carbon steel, copper, brass, aluminum, and surgical steel purchased from other
manufacturers. These products come in a wide range of sizes and are used in a variety of
applications. In many cases, the Company provides just-in-time inventory management for
its customers.
QuikWater
The Company's QuikWater division sells a patented direct contact water heater. The
water heater generates hot water on demand and has significant energy saving benefits
coupled with unique environmental advantages. It can be used in a variety of commercial
applications such as food processing, manufacturing, health care, construction, and other
markets where a high volume of hot water is required.
Quarterly Effects and Seasonality
Order rates generally tend to be lower during mid-summer and December as many of the
Companys customers schedule plant shutdowns for plant maintenance. In addition, the
Company experiences some seasonality in stainless during its third fiscal quarter, which
may result in reduced net sales and income for that period.
Backlog
Competition
The Companys major competitors include Vision Metals, Inc. for carbon heat exchanger tubing, Plymouth Tube Company for carbon boiler tubing, Damascus/Bishop Tube, Inc. and Gibson Tube, Inc. for stainless products, and Copperweld LTV, Pittsburgh Tube Company, Metalmatic and Lone Star Steel Company for mechanical tubing. Certain of these competitors are larger and have access to greater financial resources than the Company. Most of these competitors are unionized.
The Company believes that its non-union status, geographic balance, focused niche strategy, product quality, customer service and continued emphasis on technical innovations position it to compete effectively within each of its niche markets.
Quality Control
Fundamental to the Companys quality system is the control of the product and process, from raw material procurement to the ultimate delivery of finished goods to the Companys customers. On a test basis, physical and chemical analyses are performed on raw materials to verify that their mechanical and dimensional properties, cleanliness, and surface characteristics meet the Companys and industry requirements. The Company has also developed stringent process controls, including Statistical Process Control, non-destructive testing methods, and standardized operating and inspection procedures, to provide assurance of quality, and to ensure that the customers requirements are met throughout the manufacturing process.
Suppliers
Webco understands that the Company's supplier base for materials is critical to its economic health. Constant effort is directed towards developing long-term partners who can provide acceptable quality, competitive prices and dependable delivery, and are, themselves, economically stable.
Marketing and Customer Service
The Companys sales and marketing efforts for its manufactured products are directed by a vice president of sales and marketing, the President of P&J, and Webco's product sales managers. These efforts are supported by its distribution organization, internal sales staff and technical services group. The Company also emphasizes the use of its technical and engineering support staff in its product development and marketing efforts. The Companys technical services, operating, engineering, quality, sales, product planning and purchasing staffs work closely with its customers and suppliers to develop products that meet specific customer applications. Variables in the product development process include the steels microstructure, chemistry, mechanical properties, surface finish, machinability, and product consistency. The Company believes this process is essential to its sales effort and provides the Company with a competitive advantage.
Sales of the Company's Other Tubing Products are directed by the President of P&J, and its sales staff, headquartered in Glen Ellyn, Illinois. The Companys Other Tubing Products line and P&J's other sales representative accounts constitute over 50% of P&J's sales effort.
Customers and Distribution
While the Company ships product throughout North America, many of its markets and customers are located within a 500-mile radius of its manufacturing and distribution locations. As it concerns these markets and customers, this geographic advantage places the Company in a more cost competitive position relative to many of its competitors. The Company transports product for local delivery via Company-owned or leased vehicles. Longer distance deliveries are generally made via independent trucking firms.
The Company offers its finished product for shipment directly from its three manufacturing locations. In addition, the Company also inventories finished goods and functions as its own distributor in some of its markets. Such markets and customers are served on a just-in-time basis from the Companys distribution locations in Oklahoma, Texas, Illinois and Michigan. Finished goods inventories for distribution generally are suitable for sale to many customers and generally are not unique to a specific customers needs.
The Company believes that its long-term relationships with many of its customers are a significant factor in its business and that pricing, quality, service and the ability to deliver orders on a timely basis are the most critical factors in maintaining these relationships. Company executive officers actively participate in the Companys marketing efforts and have developed strong business relationships with senior management of many of the Companys principal customers.
Government Regulation
The Companys operations are also governed by laws and regulations relating to workplace safety and worker health, principally the Occupational Safety and Health Act and regulations thereunder which, among other requirements, establish noise and dust standards. Management believes it is in material compliance with these laws and regulations and does not believe that future compliance with such laws and regulations will have a material adverse effect on its results of operations or financial condition.
Employees
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including statements preceded by, or predicated upon the words "believes", "expects", "appears" or "plans", constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company, or industry results, to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied herein. Such risks, uncertainties and factors include, among others:
General Economic and Business Conditions
Many of the Companys products are sold to industries that experience significant
fluctuations in demand based on economic conditions or other matters beyond the control of
the Company. No assurance can be given that the Company will be able to increase or
maintain its level of sales in periods of economic stagnation or downturn. Through the
date of this filing, the Company has not experienced a significant change in its sales
levels or order backlog due to the economic impacts of the terrorist attacks of September
11, 2001, although there can be no assurances such stability will continue.
Competition from Imports
The level of imports of tubular products affects the domestic tubular products market,
which has varied significantly over time. High levels of imports may reduce the volume
sold by domestic producers and depress selling prices. In addition, the strength of the
U.S. Dollar and volume motives of some foreign importers may create circumstances where
product pricing is at levels that are marginally profitable or even unprofitable. The
Company believes that import levels and import pricing are affected by, among other
things, overall worldwide demand for tubular products, global economic conditions, the
trade practices of and government subsidies to foreign producers, and the weakness or
absence of governmentally imposed trade restrictions in the United States. Given the
uncertainty in certain economies of Asia, South America and Eastern Europe, competition
from foreign imports should be expected to continue.
Changes in Manufacturing Technology
Over the past 10 years, there have been significant advances in the technology
relating to the manufacture of carbon and stainless steel tubing. Such advances have
impacted the speed at which tubing can be manufactured, the quality of the tubing, and the
types and densities of materials that can be welded into tubes for advanced manufacturing
processes. In many circumstances, maintaining current manufacturing technologies is
necessary to be competitive with other domestic producers and foreign imports or to be
able to provide goods for customers advancing manufacturing needs and processes.
Maintaining current manufacturing technologies and capabilities requires investment of
capital. Manufacturers that do not maintain current technologies may be rationalized by
the industry as a result of their inability to compete against more efficiently priced
products.
Monetary Policy and Banking Environment
In the course of managing the National economy, the Federal Reserve effects policy
that impacts the cost and availability of money within the United States banking system.
These policy decisions, along with the quality of the economy, have a direct impact upon
bank credit policies. Continued tightening of credit availability could negatively impact
the Company's ability to refinance its debt upon maturity or to refinance at terms that
are not more costly than the current debt structure.
Industry Capacity
The Company and many of its competitors in both the stainless and carbon steel tubing
markets have expanded production capacity over the past decade and continue to do so in
connection with the growth in product demand and benefits related to current manufacturing
technology. Continued significant expansion could result in industry over-capacity. Over
capacity could also result from a sudden decrease in demand or a significant increase in
foreign imported supply.
Domestic Competition
Specialty steel tube manufacturing is a highly competitive market in which companies
compete on the basis of price, quality, service and ability to fill orders on a timely
basis. The Company has different competitors within each of its markets served. Certain of
these competitors are larger and have greater financial resources than the Company. Sales
of some of the Companys products represent a high percentage of the market demand
for these products, and could be targeted by competitors.
Raw Material Costs and Availability
The Company's largest component of cost of sales is raw material costs. These costs
can vary over time due to changes in steel pricing which are influenced by numerous
factors beyond the control of the Company, including general economic conditions, foreign
imports, domestic competition, labor costs, import duties and other trade restrictions.
Typically, the Company passes on these changes in cost to customers. However, reductions
in the Company's raw material costs may lag behind pressure on the Company's sales prices
or increases in raw material costs may precede increases in the Company's sales prices,
thus affecting the Company's profit margins.
Loss of Significant Customers and Customer and Vendor Work Stoppages
The Company sells its tubular products to a diverse group of more than 1,100
customers. Although no single customer represents in excess of 7% of the Companys
2001 net sales, and no one end-use sector represents more than 25% of 2001 net sales, the
loss of any significant customer, or a work stoppage at a significant customer or in an
important end-use sector, such as automotive, could have an adverse effect on the
Companys operating results.
Technical and Data Processing Capabilities of Customers and Vendors
Failure by the Companys customers and vendors to find adequate solutions to any
technical and data processing issues they may have could result in customers having a
significant interruption in their buying patterns and volumes, and vendors being unable to
deliver product required for the Companys manufacturing processes in a timely
manner.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Companys principal properties presently consist of three manufacturing plants and five distribution facilities. The following sets forth the location, area, and whether the property is owned or leased for each existing facility:
Location |
Area |
Owned or Leased |
Sand Springs, Oklahoma | 281,000 square feet |
Owned |
Manufacturing Facility | 26 acres |
|
Sand Springs, Oklahoma | 50,000 square feet |
Owned |
Distribution Facility | 18 acres |
|
Mannford, Oklahoma | 138,000 square feet |
Owned |
Manufacturing Facility | 13 acres |
|
Nederland, Texas | 25,200 square feet |
Long-term lease with a purchase |
Distribution Facility | Option of the greater of 93% of |
|
FMV or $475,000 |
||
Oil City, Pennsylvania | 205,000 square feet |
Owned |
Manufacturing Facility | 8 acres |
|
Titusville, Pennsylvania | 30,600 square feet |
Long-term lease |
Manufacturing Facility | ||
Tulsa, Oklahoma | 24,400 square feet |
Long-term lease with a |
Corporate Offices | Purchase option of $750,000 |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma | 28,000 square feet |
Long-term lease |
Finning Facility | ||
Glen Ellyn, Illinois | 25,700 square feet |
Long-term lease |
P&J Corporate Offices | ||
And Distribution Facility | ||
Lyndon, Illinois | 33,700 square feet |
Long-term lease |
Distribution Facility | ||
Grand Rapids, Michigan | 55,000 square feet |
Long-term lease |
Distribution Facility |
The Company considers all of its properties, both owned and leased, together with the related machinery and equipment contained therein, to be well maintained, in good operating condition, and suitable and adequate to carry on the Companys business.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In August 1997, the Company filed an action, Webco Industries, Inc. vs. Thermatool Corporation and Alpha Industries, Inc., relating to certain cut-off equipment sold to the Company and installed on Mill 3, which did not perform to specifications. The case, filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma (Case No. 97-CV-708H (W)), sought recoveries for the cost of the equipment and other incidental and consequential damages, including lost profits, suffered by the Company. On May 27, 1999 a jury awarded the Company $1.1 million on its claims against Thermatool. Prior to the trial, the court had ruled that the Company could not collect lost profits and certain other incidental and consequential damages, and limited the Company's possible recovery to the cost of the equipment and improvements plus interest. The damages awarded by the jury, accordingly, do not include lost profits by the Company. Now that the first trial has been decided in the Companys favor, the Company has appealed the pre-trial order that prevented the Company from recovering lost profits, and has appealed the trial courts denial of attorneys fees and pre-judgment interest. There can be no assurances that the Company will be successful on appeal or that if successful, lost profits or other damages awarded by the appeals court or in the succeeding trial, if any, will be commensurate with actual lost profits and damages and expenses suffered by the Company. Thermatool has appealed the jurys verdict and there can be no assurances as to what the outcome of that appeal will be.
The Company is also a party to various other lawsuits and claims arising in the ordinary course of business. Management, after review and consultation with legal counsel, believes that any liability resulting from these matters would not materially affect the results of operations or the financial position of the Company. The Company maintains liability insurance against risks arising out of the normal course of business.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to Webco security holders during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2001.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON STOCK
AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Webco's common stock is traded on the American Stock Exchange ("AMEX") under the symbol "WEB." At the close of business on September 30, 2001, there were 279 holders of record of Webco's common stock. The quarterly prices of Webco's common stock were as follows:
Fiscal Year 2001: | High | Low |
Fourth Quarter | 4.35 | 2.50 |
Third Quarter | 3.50 | 1.37 |
Second Quarter | 2.69 | .63 |
First Quarter | 3.25 | 2.25 |
Fiscal Year 2000: | ||
Fourth Quarter | 4.25 | 2.69 |
Third Quarter | 4.94 | 3.75 |
Second Quarter | 3.88 | 2.50 |
First Quarter | 4.88 | 2.75 |
Dividends
The Company currently intends to retain earnings to support its growth strategy and
reduce debt and does not anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable future. The Board
of Directors may reconsider or revise this policy from time to time based upon conditions
then existing, including the Company's results of operations, financial condition, and
capital requirements, as well as other factors the Board of Directors may deem relevant.
Under the Company's loan agreement, the Company may not pay dividends without the lenders
consent.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table presents selected financial information for the Company as of the end of and for each of the five years in the period ended July 31, 2001, which has been derived from the audited Financial Statements of the Company. In fiscal year 1998, Webco merged with Phillips & Johnston, Inc. ("P&J"). Because the merger was accounted for as a pooling of interests, financial results for the 1997 and 1998 periods are presented as though the companies have always been combined.
The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements of the Company and notes thereto and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
WEBCO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
Selected Financial Data
For the Years Ended July 31,
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Income Statement Data: 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997
Net sales (1)
$151,760 $ 144,941 $ 138,581
$ 155,751 $132,352
Gross profit
15,906 19,368
21,353
28,486
20,228
Income from operations
2,139 2,346
(2) 5,564
11,305
7,234 (3)
Income (loss) before
income taxes
(2,592) (1,646)
3,012
9,009
5,187
Net income (loss) (4)
(1,602) (1,025)
1,876
6,207
3,931
Net income (loss) per share (4):
Basic
(0.23) (0.14)
.26
.87
.55
Diluted
(0.23) (0.14)
.26
.86
.55
Pro forma net income (5) 5,511 3,179
Pro forma net income per share (5):
Basic
.77 .44
Diluted
.76 .44
Balance Sheet Data:
Working capital
$ 30,219 $ 30,129
$ 32,346
$ 30,861 $
33,837
Total assets
128,347 130,123
120,481
111,758
102,142
Long-term debt (net of
current portion)
46,010 43,979
39,746
32,894
34,470
Stockholders' equity 47,046 48,648 49,673 48,245 45,220
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the "Selected Financial Data" and the Financial Statements of the Company and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
Overview
The Company's philosophy is to pursue growth and profitability through the
identification of niche markets that preferably involve specialty tubular products that
require a high level of value engineering and can be dominated from an industry or
customer standpoint. The Company uses its quality standards, customer service and
manufacturing technology to achieve such market penetration.
The Company experienced sequential improvement in quarterly income (loss) from operations during the year ended July 31, 2001 as shown in the following table (dollars in thousands):
Quarters Ended
October 31, January 31,
April 30,
July 31,
Total
2000
2001
2001
2001 Year
Net sales
$37,995
$38,703 $37,065
$37,997
$151,760
Gross profit
3,156
3,770
4,153 4,827
15,906
Income (loss) from operations
(625)
73
653 2,038
2,139
Net income (loss)
(1,153)
(755)
(300) 606
(1,602)
The first quarter of fiscal 2001 was negatively impacted by a one-week suspension at the Sand Springs facility in August for repair and maintenance projects. The second quarter of fiscal 2001 was further hampered by increased costs during the start-up phase of the plant expansion in Oil City. A fire at the Oil City facility in February 2001 further delayed the start-up, making the fourth quarter of fiscal 2001 the first fully operational quarter for all facilities for the year. Now that the major expansion project in Oil City is complete, the Company is focusing on improving its profitability and debt reduction. Please see Part II, Item 8: "Supplementary Data" of this Form 10-K for complete quarterly financial data.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth certain income statement data for each of the three
years in the period ended July 31, 2001 (certain amounts may not calculate due to
rounding):
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
|||||||
Dollar |
%
of |
Dollar |
%
of |
Dollar |
%
of |
||||
(Dollars in millions) | |||||||||
Net sales | $151.8 |
100.0% |
$144.9 |
100.0% |
$138.6 |
100.0% |
|||
Gross profit | 15.9 |
10.5 |
19.4 |
13.4 |
21.4 |
15.4 |
|||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 13.8 |
9.1 |
15.6 |
10.8 |
15.8 |
11.4 |
|||
Income from operations | 2.1 |
1.4 |
2.3 |
1.6 |
5.6 |
4.0 |
The following discussions of sales levels, prices and gross profit revolve around the Company's Manufactured Tubing Products (carbon and stainless steel tubing from its three plants in Oklahoma and Pennsylvania), Other Tubing Products (purchased tubular goods made of stainless steel, carbon steel, copper, and brass) and QuikWater. In Fiscal 2001, the Company changed its method of accounting for freight expense to include it as a cost of sale rather than a reduction of revenue, accordingly the 2000 and 1999 periods have been adjusted to reflect this change.
Fiscal 2001 Compared with Fiscal 2000
Manufactured Tubing Product sales increased $4.4 million, or 3.4 percent, to $134.2
million in 2001 from $129.8 million in 2000. The increase in net sales reflects a 5.0
percent increase in the average net sales price per ton realized during 2001, which was
partially offset by a 1.6 percent decrease in the tonnage of tubing sold. The overall
increase in the average net sales price per ton reflects the growth in sales of the
Companys stainless and heat exchanger products during 2001 combined with a decrease
in sales of lower priced carbon mechanical tubing products. The decrease in the tonnage of
tubing sold is a combination of a change in sales mix most impacted by the decreased
demand for general mechanical tubing products.
Gross profit for Manufactured Tubing Products decreased to $12.4 million, or 9.2 percent of net sales, in 2001 from $16.4 million, or 12.6 percent of net sales, in 2000. This decrease is a function of a 9.1 percent increase in the average manufactured cost per ton of tubing sold, driven mostly by increased raw material prices most notably in stainless material, offset by the 5.0 percent increase in the average net selling price per ton, noted above. A one-week suspension at the Sand Springs facility in August and higher payrolls and operating expenses at the Oil City facility due to the plant expansion negatively impacted margins in the current fiscal year. Margins were further reduced by increased natural gas prices and continued pricing pressure in the carbon mechanical tubing product markets.
Other Tubing Products sales are made primarily by Webcos subsidiary, P&J. Sales of these products increased 12.7 percent to $14.1 million in 2001 from $12.5 million in 2000. Gross profit from Other Tubing Products decreased to $2.5 million, or 17.7 percent of net sales, in 2001 from $2.7 million, or 21.6 percent of net sales, in 2000. The increase in sales and decline in gross profit is a result of increased volumes at reduced sales prices among most specialty tubing lines. Pricing pressure remains strong throughout the mechanical and specialty stainless tubing markets.
Sales for QuikWater increased 31.5 percent to $3.5 million in 2001 from $2.6 million in 2000. Gross profit for QuikWater was $975,000, or 28 percent of net sales, in 2001 as compared with $263,000, or 10.2 percent of net sales, in 2000. The increase in sales and gross profit is a result of improved market conditions for the QuikWater product due to changes in certain environmental standards, primarily on the West coast of the United States, and further development of marketing strategies along with market diversification. In addition, the gross profit percentage increase is a reflection of improved volumes along with the outsourcing arrangement for the manufacturing of the units, which has greatly reduced the amount of unproductive overhead costs incurred.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2000, the Company recorded a $986,000 pre-tax charge related to the write-off of QuikWater intangible, and certain other long-lived, assets. QuikWater continues to operate and the remaining asset values are being depreciated as part of the normal course of business. In addition, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2000, the Company recorded a $414,000 pre-tax charge related to the write-down of underutilized tubing equipment.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased 11.5 percent to $13.8 million in fiscal 2001 from $15.6 million in fiscal 2000. The decrease in the current year is primarily the result of a decrease of $189,000 in legal fees principally related to labor matters, a $516,000 decrease in information technology expenses incurred as a result of cost cutting efforts, a $225,000 decrease in amortization expense principally related to the QuikWater intangibles written off in fiscal year 2000, and a $630,000 decrease in administrative labor and overhead expenses realized as a result of certain cost savings measures implemented during the first and second quarters of fiscal 2001. The Company also realized a $236,000 gain on the sale of real estate that is included as part of selling, general and administrative expenses in 2001.
Interest expense for fiscal 2001 increased to $4.7 million (net of $375,000 capitalized) from $4.0 million (net of $313,000 capitalized) in fiscal 2000. The increase in interest prior to interest capitalization is the result of the average level of debt under the bank Loan and Security Agreement increasing $3.8 million to $48.5 million for 2001 as compared with $44.7 million for 2000. In addition, the related average interest rate increased to 8.9 percent in 2001 from 8.8 percent in 2000. The Company has historically elected for its term debt and a significant portion of its outstanding revolver to bear interest at a floating rate based on LIBOR. Higher borrowing levels have resulted from declines in operating cash flow and the expansion in Oil City, Pennsylvania. LIBOR, much like the prime rate, has experienced decreases during fiscal 2001, however, due to the amortization of loan costs to interest expense and the Company's amended bank agreement with its primary lender, the Company has not yet fully realized the benefit of those decreases. With the additional interest rate reductions since July, the Company anticipates a slightly lower average interest rate in the first quarter of fiscal 2002.
Fiscal 2000 Compared with Fiscal 1999
Manufactured Tubing Product sales increased $6.9 million, or 5.6 percent, to $129.8
million in 2000 from $122.9 million in 1999. The increase in net sales reflects a 7.0
percent increase in the tonnage of tubing sold during 2000, which was partially offset by
a 1.4 percent decrease in the average net sales price per ton. The overall increase in the
tonnage of tubing sold reflects the growth in the Companys stainless, boiler and OEM
mechanical tubing markets. The decrease in the average net selling price is a combination
of a change in sales mix and eroded pricing in the heat exchanger market and general
mechanical tubing products.
Gross profit for Manufactured Tubing Products decreased to $16.4 million, or 12.6 percent of net sales, in 2000 from $18.4 million, or 15.0 percent of net sales, in 1999. This decrease is a function of the 1.4 percent decline in average net selling price per ton, noted above. This combined with an increase of 10.9 percent in the average manufactured cost per ton of tubing sold caused by increased raw material prices.
Other Tubing Products sales are made primarily by Webcos subsidiary, P&J. Sales of these products increased 3.1 percent to $12.5 million in 2000 from $12.1 million in 1999. Gross profit from Other Tubing Products increased to $2.7 million, or 21.6 percent of net sales, in 2000 from $2.6 million, or 21.4 percent of net sales, in 1999. The slight increase in sales and gross profit was the result of volume increases and a change in sales mix from the prior year period.
Sales for QuikWater decreased 23.5 percent to $2.6 million in 2000 from $3.4 million in 1999. Gross profit for QuikWater was $263,000, or 10.2 percent of net sales, in 2000 as compared with $388,000, or 11.4 percent of net sales, in 1999. The decrease in sales is a result of a decline in demand in the food processing industry and pending environmental standards in California. As a result of low volumes, gross profit percentages remained low due to the under-utilization of available manufacturing capacity. Beginning in late 2000, the Company contracted with an entity owned by the majority stockholders to subcontract the production of the QuikWater units. Management believes this will enable the company to achieve improved margins by not having to incur the costs of personnel and overhead.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2000, the Company recorded a $986,000 pre-tax charge related to the write-off of QuikWater intangible, and certain other long-lived, assets. QuikWater continues to operate and the remaining asset values are being depreciated as part of the normal course of business. In addition, the Company recorded a $414,000 pre-tax charge related to the write-down of underutilized tubing equipment that the Company anticipates selling.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased 1.3 percent to $15.6 million in fiscal 2000 from $15.8 million in fiscal 1999. The decrease in the current year is primarily the result of an approximately $930,000 decrease in legal expenses, primarily related to the Thermatool litigation and labor related matters, and a decrease of $145,000 in profit sharing to employees. These decreases were principally offset by an increase of approximately $435,000 in depreciation related to the ERP system and $465,000 of additional information technology expenses incurred in support of the new ERP system.
Interest expense for fiscal 2000 increased to $4.0 million (net of $313,000 capitalized) from $2.6 million (net of $437,000 capitalized) in fiscal 1999. The increase in interest prior to interest capitalization is the result of the average level of debt under the bank Loan and Security Agreement increasing $9.3 million to $44.7 million for 2000 as compared with $35.4 million for 1999. In addition, the related average interest rate increased to 8.8 percent in 2000 from 7.2 percent in 1999. The Company has historically elected for its term debt and a significant portion of its outstanding revolver to bear interest at a floating rate based on LIBOR. LIBOR, much like the prime rate, experienced increases during fiscal 2000. Higher borrowing levels have resulted from increased inventories, implementation of the ERP system, and the expansions in Oil City, Pennsylvania, and Mannford, Oklahoma.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net cash provided by operations was $3.2 million, $4.2 million and $8.6 million in
fiscal 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. Accounts receivable increased in 2001 and 2000
primarily as a result of the increase in sales from the prior year. Inventories decreased
in 2001 and increased in 2000 and 1999. Inventories decreased in 2001 primarily due to
management's efforts to reduce raw material inventory levels at the manufacturing
facilities, which was partially offset by increases in finished goods levels. The increase
in inventory in 2000 and 1999 was partly the result of the Companys ability to make
strategic volume purchases in anticipation of rising prices and the result of an overall
increase in raw material prices. Accounts payable increased in 2000 and 1999 primarily as
a result of the increase in inventory. Over the past three years, the Company has on
average turned its steel tube inventories approximately 4 times per year.
Net cash used in investing activities was $5.4 million, $10.5 million and $12.9 million in fiscal 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. During the third quarter of fiscal 2001, the Company completed the expansion of the Oil City facility, which included the installation of a new mill along with other supporting equipment and plant construction. In 2000, the Company added a new mill and upgraded technology on existing mills at the stainless plant, completed the installation of its ERP system, and continued the expansion of facilities and machinery at its Oil City plant. In 1999 the Company added new mills at its stainless plant, continued the development and installation of the ERP system, and began the expansion of facilities and operations at its Oil City plant.
The Companys capital requirements have historically been to fund equipment purchases and for general working capital needs resulting from the growth that the Company has experienced. The Company has followed an aggressive capital expenditure plan as part of its growth strategy and to enable it to continue to be a leader in tubular manufacturing technologies. With the major expansion project in Oil City now complete, the Company plans to focus on debt reduction and working capital management. The Company currently intends to retain earnings to support this strategy and does not anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable future.
The Company's senior debt facilities provide for a term loan of $25 million, a line of credit of $25 million and a capital expenditure ("CAPEX") facility in the amount of $5 million to finance equipment at the Oil City, Pennsylvania plant. As of July 31, 2001, the Company had $22.5 million outstanding on the term loan, $20.3 million under the revolving line of credit and $3.8 million outstanding on the CAPEX facility. These loans mature on August 31, 2002, and are collateralized by substantially all of the Companys assets other than the Sand Springs real estate. The Company may have borrowings and outstanding letters of credit ($1,056,000 at July 31, 2001) under the revolving credit facility up to the lesser of $25 million or an amount determined by a formula based on the amount of eligible inventories and accounts receivable. At July 31, 2001, $3.7 million was available for borrowing under this line of credit. The CAPEX loan was fully funded up to the $5 million cap during the second quarter of fiscal 2001. Principal payments on the term loan and CAPEX facility of $208,000 and $80,000, respectively, plus interest, are due each month until maturity.
Due to the August 31, 2002, maturity date of the Company's senior debt facilities, the Company is currently in discussions to refinance or extend the current debt agreement. If the Company is unable to refinance or extend the agreement, a significant portion of its long-term debt will be classified as a current liability in the financial statements contained in its Form 10-Q for its first fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2001, since the maturity date will be within 12 months of the balance sheet date. The debt will not be due on demand or otherwise callable by the lender at that time, and the Company will have until the maturity date to refinance or extend the agreement. Although the Company believes it will be successful in its efforts to refinance or extend the agreement, there can be no assurances the Company will be successful in its efforts.
The Company's debt agreement, as amended on November 13, 2000, contains covenants regarding debt coverage and the ratio of indebtedness to equity. The covenants also limit capital expenditures and dividends and require the Company to maintain a minimum borrowing base availability without considering the $25 million revolving loan cap. As of July 31, 2001, the Company was in compliance with all such covenants.
The Company has arranged financing with various public agencies related to the Oil City facility, of which, $2.96 million is outstanding and no additional amounts remain available for borrowing as of July 31, 2001. The agency loans are collateralized by the underlying real estate and/or equipment and the guarantee of the principal stockholder/officer. The notes mature over a 3 to 10 year period and bear interest at rates ranging from 3 to 5 percent.
P&J has a line of credit agreement for $2,000,000 and a term loan of $500,000 with its primary lender. As of July 31, 2001, the Company had $298,000 outstanding on the term loan. The line of credit matures on November 30, 2001, and the term loan matures in April 2004. Both loans are collateralized by P&Js assets. At July 31, 2001, $2.0 million was available for borrowing under the line of credit.
In the past, the Company has funded its capital growth expenditures with a combination of cash flow from operations and debt. The Company is currently focused on reducing debt and does not have any major expansions planned.
Capital spending plans for fiscal year 2002 primarily consist of minor projects and normal maintenance spending, which is expected to total less than $4.5 million for the year.Outstanding Litigation
On May 27, 1999, a jury awarded the Company $1.1 million on its claims against a
vendor of certain cut-off equipment that did not perform to specifications. In a pre-trial
order, the court ruled that the Company could not collect lost profits and certain other
incidental and consequential damages, and limited the Company's possible recovery to the
cost of the equipment and improvements plus interest. The vendor has appealed the
jurys verdict and the Company has appealed the pre-trial order. There can be no
assurances as to what the outcome of the appeals will be or that ultimate damages
collected by the Company, if any, will be commensurate with losses incurred by the
Company. Please see Part I, Item 3: "Legal Proceedings" of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K for additional information regarding this matter.
The Company is also a party to various other lawsuits and claims arising in the ordinary course of business. Management, after review and consultation with legal counsel, believes that any liability resulting from these matters would not materially affect the results of operations or the financial position of the Company. The Company maintains liability insurance against risks arising out of the normal course of business.
Stock Repurchase Plan
In March 1999, the Company's Board of Directors approved a plan to acquire up to
$500,000 of its common stock. Of the approved $500,000 repurchase, the Company acquired
95,000 shares of stock for approximately $448,000 during fiscal year 1999. The Company
currently does not anticipate any additional repurchases in the near-term.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Webco Industries, Inc.
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Webco Industries, Inc. and subsidiary at July 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended July 31, 2001, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under item 14(a)(2), presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Tulsa, Oklahoma
September 19, 2001
WEBCO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
July 31, 2001 and 2000
(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts and par value)
Current assets:
Cash
$ 989
$ 1,633
Accounts receivable, net
19,399
17,536
Inventories
33,351
35,765
Prepaid expenses
295
435
Deferred income tax asset
2,210
2,047
Total current assets 56,244 57,416
Property, plant and equipment, net 67,090 68,067
Notes receivable from related parties 1,801 1,801
Other assets, net 3,212 2,839
Total assets
$ 128,347
$ 130,123
======
======
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable
$ 16,923
$ 17,938
Accrued liabilities
5,160
5,259
Current portion of long-term debt
3,942
4,090
Total current liabilities 26,025 27,287
Long-term debt 46,010 43,979
Deferred income tax liability 9,266 10,209
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)
Stockholders' equity
Common stock, $.01 par value, 12,000,000 shares
authorized, 7,073,723 shares issued and
outstanding
71
71
Additional paid-in capital
35,732
35,732
Retained earnings
11,243
12,845
Total stockholders' equity 47,046 48,648
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
$ 128,347
$ 130,123
======
======
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
WEBCO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Years Ended July 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
2001 2000 1999 -
Net sales
$ 151,760 $ 144,941
$ 138,581
Cost of sales
135,854 125,573
117,228
Gross profit 15,906 19,368 21,353
Selling, general and administrative expenses
13,767
15,622
15,789
Special item: asset write-off
-
1,400
-
Income from operations
2,139
2,346
5,564
Interest expense 4,731 3,992 2,552
Income (loss) before income taxes (2,592) (1,646) 3,012
Provision (benefit) for income taxes (990) (621) 1,136
Net income (loss)
$ (1,602) $
(1,025) $ 1,876
====== ======
======
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic
$ (.23)
$
(.14) $ .26
====== ======
======
Diluted
$ (.23)
$ (.14) $
.26
====== ======
======
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic
7,074
7,074
7,135
====== ======
======
Diluted
7,074
7,074
7,139
====== ======
======
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
WEBCO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
For the Years Ended July 31, 2001, 2000 and
1999
(Dollars in thousands)
Additional
Total
Common Paid-In
Retained
Stockholders
Stock Capital
Earnings
Equity
Balances, July 31, 1998 $ 72 $ 36,179 $ 11,994 $ 48,245
Purchases of common stock (1) (447) - (448)
Net income - - 1,876 1,876
Balances, July 31, 1999 71 35,732 13,870 49,673
Net loss - - (1,025) (1,025)
Balances, July 31, 2000 71 35,732 12,845 48,648
Net loss - - (1,602) (1,602)
Balances, July 31, 2001 $ 71 $ 35,732 $ 11,243 $ 47,046
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
WEBCO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended July 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
(Dollars in thousands)
2001 2000 1999 -
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)
$ (1,602) $ (1,025)
$ 1,876
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
6,188
5,910
5,158
(Gain) loss on write-off and disposition
of property, plant and
equipment
(202)
1,417
(10)
Deferred tax expense (benefit)
(1,070)
(787)
1,069
(Increase) decrease in:
Accounts receivable
(1,863)
(1,335)
2,211
Inventories
2,414
(4,498)
(3,010)
Prepaid expenses
(283)
(146)
(84)
Increase (decrease) in:
Accounts payable
(179)
4,335
2,907
Accrued liabilities
(183)
307
(1,536)
Net cash provided by operating activities
3,220
4,178
8,581
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures
(6,487) (10,462)
(12,555)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and
equipment
1,038
107
21
(Increase) decrease in other assets
12
(98)
(340)
Net cash used in investing activities
(5,437) (10,453)
(12,874)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from long-term debt
137,862 125,100
132,960
Principal payments on long-term debt
(135,979) (117,672)
(126,495)
Debt Issue Costs
(140)
-
-
Purchases of common stock
-
-
(448)
Increase (decrease) in book overdrafts
(170)
300
(1,810)
Net cash provided by financing activities
1,573
7,728
4,207
Net increase (decrease) in cash
(644)
1,453
(86)
Cash, beginning of period
1,633
180
266
Cash, end of period
$ 989
$ 1,633
$ 180
====== ======
======
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Interest paid, net of amount capitalized of
$375, $313,
and $437 in 2001, 2000
and 1999, respectively
$ 4,816
$ 3,834
$
2,664
======
====== ======
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
WEBCO INDUSTRIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION - The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Webco Industries, Inc. ("Webco" or together with its subsidiary, the "Company") and its wholly owned subsidiary Phillips & Johnston, Inc. ("P&J"), a Chicago based sales organization and value-added processor of tubular products. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the accompanying financial statements.
NATURE OF OPERATIONS - Webco is a specialty manufacturer of high-quality carbon and stainless steel tubing products designed to industry and customer specifications. Webco's tubing products consist primarily of: heat exchanger and welded carbon boiler tubing, stainless tube and pipe, and specialty carbon mechanical tubing for use in consumer durable and capital goods. The Company's subsidiary, P&J, represents several manufacturers who produce various non-competing mechanical and specialty tubular products made from copper, brass, aluminum and stainless and carbon steel, among others. This access to other tubing products allows the Company to better serve its customers by offering a full range of tubing products. Through its QuikWater division, the Company manufactures and markets a patented direct contact water heater for commercial and industrial applications. The Company, headquartered in Sand Springs, Oklahoma, has three production facilities in Oklahoma and Pennsylvania and five distribution facilities in Oklahoma, Texas, Illinois and Michigan, serving more than 1,100 customers throughout North America.
CONCENTRATIONS - The Company maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts, which at times may exceed the federal insurance limits. As of July 31, 2001 and 2000, the Company had cash in banks totaling $886,000 and $1,558,000, respectively, in excess of federal depository insurance limits, respectively. The Company has not experienced any losses on such accounts in the past.
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE - Accounts receivable represent short-term credit granted to the Company's customers for which collateral is generally not required. Accounts receivable at July 31, 2001 and 2000, are net of an allowance for uncollectible amounts of $620,000 and $237,000, respectively. Credit risk on receivables is considered by management to be limited due to the variety of industries served and geographic dispersion of customers.
INVENTORIES - The Company values its inventories at the lower of cost or market. Cost for raw materials, work-in-process, finished goods and maintenance parts and supplies are determined on the weighted average cost method. Inventories at July 31, 2001 and 2000 are net of reserves for obsolescence of $853,000 and $566,000, respectively.
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT - Property, plant and equipment, including tooling, is stated at historical cost and includes interest capitalized on major construction projects. Gains or losses on sales and retirements of property are reflected in operations. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives: buildings and improvements - 10 to 40 years, machinery and equipment - 3 to 25 years, computer equipment and software 3 to 7 years, and furniture and fixtures - 3 to 10 years. Repair and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.
Depreciation expense for the years ended July 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, amounted to $6,188,000, $5,697,000 and $4,817,000, respectively. Fully depreciated assets still in use at July 31, 2001 and 2000, amounted to $13,179,000 and $11,719,000, respectively.
BOOK OVERDRAFTS - Included in accounts payable at July 31, 2001 and 2000, are outstanding checks in excess of bank deposits totaling $289,000 and $459,000, respectively.
ACCOUNTING FOR CERTAIN LONG-LIVED ASSETS The Company evaluates its assets for impairment in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of"("SFAS 121"). The Company reviews its long-lived assets (including intangibles) for impairment based on estimated future non-discounted cash flows attributable to the assets. In the event such cash flows are not expected to be sufficient to recover the recorded value of the assets, the assets are written down to their estimated fair values (Note 4).
ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
REVENUE RECOGNITION - The Company recognizes revenue at the date products are shipped or at the date services are completed.
In fiscal year 2001, the Company changed its accounting for freight expense to include it as a cost of sales rather than as a reduction of revenue. Net Sales and Cost of Sales for each of the fiscal years 2000 and 1999 have been adjusted in the accompanying statements of operations to conform to the new presentation. The amounts reclassified for 2000 and 1999 were $4,021,000 and $3,837,000, respectively. This reclassification had no effect on gross profit or net income(loss) for either period.
EARNINGS PER SHARE - Earnings per share are calculated based on the number of weighted average common shares outstanding, including the effect of dilutive options when applicable, in accordance with the computation, presentation and disclosure requirements of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 128, "Earnings Per Share" ("SFAS No. 128").
INCOME TAXES - The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes" ("SFAS No. 109"). The provisions of SFAS No. 109 require the recording of deferred tax assets and liabilities to reflect the expected tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each year end.
2. INVENTORIES
Inventories at July 31, 2001 and 2000, consisted of the following:
2001 |
2000 |
||
(Dollars in Thousands) |
|||
Raw materials | $ 11,269 |
$ 17,708 |
|
Work-in-process | 1,908 |
2,155 |
|
Finished goods | 17,558 |
13,469 |
|
Maintenance parts and supplies | 2,616 |
2,433 |
|
Total inventories | $ 33,351 ===== |
$ 35,765 ===== |
3. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Net property, plant and equipment at July 31, 2001 and 2000, consisted of the following:
2001 |
2000 |
||
(Dollars in Thousands) |
|||
Land | $ 1,247 |
$ 1,436 |
|
Buildings and improvements | 18,432 |
19,077 |
|
Machinery and equipment | 81,496 |
70,531 |
|
Computer equipment and software | 9,341 |
9,259 |
|
Furniture and fixtures | 1,225 |
1,208 |
|
Construction in progress | 416 |
5,832 |
|
112,157 |
107,343 |
||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | 45,067 |
39,276 |
|
Net property, plant and equipment | $ 67,090 ===== |
$ 68,067 ===== |
4. SPECIAL ITEM: ASSET WRITE-OFF
The Company periodically reviews the recorded value of its long-lived assets to determine if the future cash flows to be derived from these assets will be sufficient to recover the remaining recorded asset values. In accordance with SFAS 121 during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2000, based upon a review of the Companys long-lived assets, the Company recorded a non-cash charge of $1.4 million. This included a $986,000 pre-tax charge related to the write-off of the recorded asset values of certain QuikWater fixed assets that were still being used in operations as of July 31, 2000, along with unamortized patent and goodwill costs. Also included was a $414,000 pre-tax charge related to the write-down of certain tubing equipment that the Company anticipates selling. The Company considers continued operating losses and significant and long-term changes in industry conditions to be its primary indicators of potential impairment. The Companys estimates of fair value were based on appraised values, industry comparisons, or other estimates of fair value such as discounted future cash flows. Accordingly, actual results could vary significantly from such estimates. The Company has continued to depreciate the remaining book value, if any, of these assets.
5. LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt at July 31, 2001 and 2000, consisted of the following:
2001 |
2000 |
|
(Dollars In Thousands) |
||
Term loans (A) | $ 26,311 |
$ 27,889 |
Revolving loan (A) | 20,270 |
17,673 |
Revolving loan (B) | - |
110 |
Term loan (C) | 298 |
392 |
Real estate and equipment term loans (D) | 2,961 |
1,613 |
Other note payable (E) | - |
205 |
Other | 112 |
187 |
49,952 |
48,069 |
|
Less current maturities | 3,942 |
4,090 |
Long-term debt | $ 46,010 ===== |
$ 43,979 ===== |
Based upon the borrowing rates currently available to the Company for borrowings with similar terms and average maturities, the Company believes that the carrying amount of its long-term debt approximates fair value.
At July 31, 2001, the aggregate future maturities of long-term debt are as follows: 2002 - $3,942,000; 2003 - $43,657,000; 2004 - $465,000; 2005 - $306,000; 2006 - $299,000; and thereafter - $1,283,000.
6. INCOME TAXES
The provision for income taxes for fiscal 2001, 2000 and 1999 consists of the following:
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
|
(Dollars in Thousands) |
|||
Current: | |||
Federal | $ - | $ - | $ - |
State | 80 | 166 | 67 |
Deferred: | |||
Federal | (957) | (705) | 956 |
State | (113) | (82) | 113 |
Total income tax expense (benefit) | $ (990) ===== |
$ (621) ===== |
$ 1,136 ===== |
The actual income tax expense (benefit) for fiscal 2001, 2000 and 1999 differs from income tax based on the federal statutory rate (34%) due to the following:
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
|
(Dollars in Thousands) |
|||
Expected tax expense (benefit) | $ (881) |
$ (560) |
$ 1,024 |
State income taxes, net of federal benefit | (104) |
(66) |
120 |
Other | (5) |
5 |
(8) |
Total income tax expense (benefit) | $ (990) |
$ (621) |
$ 1,136 |
At July 31, 2001 and 2000, deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities consisted of the following:
2001 |
2000 |
|
(Dollars in Thousands) |
||
Net current deferred tax assets (liabilities): | ||
Accounts receivable | $ 236 |
$ 102 |
Inventories | 515 |
375 |
Accrued liabilities | 1,459 |
1,570 |
Net current deferred tax asset | $ 2,210 |
$ 2,047 ===== |
Net non-current deferred tax assets (liabilities): | ||
Property plant and equipment | $ (13,929) |
$ (12,445) |
General business credit carry forward | 38 |
38 |
Alternative minimum tax credit carry forward | 452 |
452 |
Intangible assets | 358 |
409 |
Operating loss carry forwards | 3,815 |
1,337 |
Net non-current deferred tax liability | $ (9,266) |
$ (10,209) |
At July 31, 2001, the Company has operating loss carry forwards for regular tax purposes of approximately $9,725,000, which expire in 2012 to 2016.
7. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
LITIGATION -
On May 27, 1999, a jury awarded the Company $1.1 million on certain claims against an equipment vendor. Because of a pre-trial ruling by the courts, the jury was unable to award the Company lost profits and certain other incidental and consequential damages. The Company is currently pursuing attorneys fees and has appealed the pre-trial order to obtain lost profits. There can be no assurances that the Company will be successful on appeal or that if successful, lost profits awarded in the succeeding trial, if any, will be commensurate with actual lost profits suffered by the Company. The vendor has appealed the jurys original verdict and there can be no assurances as to what the outcome of that appeal will be. Due to the uncertainty surrounding the case, the financial statements do not include any portion of the jury award or other recoveries.The Company is also a party to various other lawsuits and claims arising out of the ordinary course of business. Management believes that any liability resulting from these matters would not materially affect the results of operations or the financial position of the Company.
LEASES - The Company leases certain buildings and machinery and equipment under non-cancelable operating leases. Under certain of these leases the Company is required to pay property taxes, insurance, repairs and other costs related to the leased property. At July 31, 2001, future minimum payments under non-cancelable leases accounted for as operating leases are $2,102,000 in 2002; $1,706,000 in 2003; $1,157,000 in 2004; $961,000 in 2005; and $861,000 in 2006. Total rent expense for all operating leases was $2,916,000, $2,268,000 and $2,191,000 in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
SELF-INSURANCE - The Company maintains a hospitalization and medical coverage program for its employees. Claims under this program are limited to annual losses of $60,000 per participant, and aggregate annual claims of up to $2,000,000 through the use of a stop-loss insurance policy. Additionally, the Company self-insures Oklahoma workers' compensation claims up to $225,000 per occurrence and retains a maximum aggregate liability of $2,000,000 per two-year policy term with respect to all occurrences. The Company has a performance bond in the amount of $550,000 on file with the State of Oklahoma Workers Compensation Court, as required by self-insurance regulations. Provisions for claims under both programs are accrued based upon the Company's estimate of the aggregate liability for claims (including claims incurred, but not yet reported). The total reserve for self-insurance for medical and workers compensation was $1,445,000 and $1,500,000 at July 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
PURCHASE COMMITMENTS - At July 31, 2001 and 2000, the Company was committed on outstanding purchase orders for inventory approximating $12.4 million and $13.3 million, respectively. Additionally, the Company had on its premises at July 31, 2001 and 2000, raw material on consignment from certain vendors valued at approximately $1.0 million and $2.2 million, respectively.
8. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
The Company maintains 401-K benefit plans covering all employees meeting certain service requirements. The plans includes a cash or deferred compensation arrangement permitting elective contributions to be made by the participants. Company contributions are made at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Company contributions were $346,000, $327,000 and $419,000 in fiscal 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
9. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY AND STOCK OPTIONS
In January 1994, the Company's stockholders approved the 1994 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan"), in which directors, employees and consultants are eligible to participate. Four types of benefits may be granted in any combination under the Plan: incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, restricted stock and stock appreciation rights. The Plan also provides for certain automatic grants to outside directors. All options expire ten years from the date of grant (except the vice-chairman's options, which expire five years from the date of grant) and are exercisable at a price which is at least equal to fair market value on the date of grant (110% of fair market value in the case of the vice-chairman). The employee options vest evenly over a period of two to five years from the date of grant. The maximum number of shares of common stock with respect to which incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, restricted stock, and stock appreciation rights may be issued under the Plan is 850,000.
Activity under the Plan for the last three fiscal years was as follows:
Activity under the Plan was as follows: | Number of Shares |
Weighted Average |
Balance, July 31, 1998 | 514,500 |
6.69 |
Granted | 66,200 |
6.17 |
Forfeited | (42,700) |
7.23 |
Balance, July 31, 1999 | 538,000 |
6.58 |
Granted | 230,300 |
4.17 |
Forfeited | (36,800) |
6.03 |
Balance, July 31, 2000 | 731,500 |
5.85 |
Granted | 138,000 |
1.60 |
Forfeited | (61,500) |
5.88 |
Balance, July 31, 2001 | 808,000 |
5.12 |
Outstanding options and exercisable options at July 31, 2001 were as follows:
Exercise Prices |
Number |
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life |
Weighted |
Outstanding: | |||
$1.44 - $2.75 | 138,000 |
9.3 years |
$1.60 |
$3.31 - $5.75 | 251,000 |
7.8 years |
$4.31 |
$6.13 - $8.75 | 419,000 |
5.4 years |
$6.77 |
Exercisable: | |||
$1.44 - $2.75 | 7,500 |
9.4 years |
$1.56 |
$3.31 - $5.75 | 83,260 |
7.3 years |
$4.55 |
$6.13 - $8.75 | 343,060 |
5.2 years |
$6.71 |
As of July 31, 2000 and 1999, exercisable options were 332,460 and 198,600, respectively, with weighted average exercise prices of $6.48 and $6.53, respectively.
The Company has elected to follow APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," in accounting for its employee stock options rather than the alternative fair value accounting provided for under SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation." Under APB No. 25, because the exercise price of the Companys stock options is at least equal to the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant, no compensation expense is recognized in the Companys financial statements. Pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share is required by SFAS No. 123. This information is required to be determined as if the Company had accounted for its employee stock options granted subsequent to July 31, 1995, under the fair value method of that statement.The fair value of options granted in fiscal years 2001, 2000 and 1999 reported below has been estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
|
Weighted average life | 4.1 years |
4.0 years |
4.0 years |
Risk-free interest rate | 5.52-6.0% |
5.92-6.26% |
5.14% |
Expected volatility | 59% |
55% |
56% |
Expected dividend yield | None |
None |
None |
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility. Because the Companys options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in the opinion of management, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of fair value of its options. The weighted average estimated fair value of employee stock options, whose exercise price equals the market value on the grant date, granted during 2001, 2000 and 1999 was $.81, $1.92 and $2.88 per share, respectively. The weighted average exercise price and estimated fair value of employee stock options, whose exercise price exceeds the market value on the grant date, granted during 2000 was $4.00 and $1.69, respectively. There were no options granted in 2001 or 1999 with an exercise price exceeding market value on the grant date.
For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the options is amortized to expense over the options vesting period. The Companys pro forma information for fiscal years 2001, 2000 and 1999 is as follows:
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
|
Pro forma net income (loss) | $ (1,743,000) |
$ (1,253,000) |
$ 1,625,000 |
Pro forma net income (loss) per share, diluted | $ ( 0.25) |
$ ( 0.18) |
$ 0.23 |
The above SFAS No. 123 pro forma disclosures are not necessarily representative of the effect SFAS No. 123 will have on the pro forma disclosure of future years.
In March 1999, the Company's Board of Directors approved a plan to acquire up to $500,000 of its common stock. Of the approved $500,000 repurchase, the Company acquired 95,000 shares of stock for approximately $448,000 during fiscal year 1999. The Company currently does not anticipate any additional repurchases in the near-term.
10. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Presented below is a reconciliation of the differences between actual weighted average shares outstanding, which are used in computing basic earnings per share, and diluted weighted average shares, which are used in computing diluted earnings per share.
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
|||
(shares in thousands) | |||||
Basic EPS: |
|||||
Weighted average shares outstanding |
7,074 |
7,074 |
7,135 |
||
Effect of dilutive securities: Options |
- |
- |
4 |
||
Diluted EPS: |
|||||
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
7,074 |
7,074 |
7,139 |
||
Anti-dilutive options outstanding (1): |
|||||
Number of options |
808 |
732 |
480 |
||
Weighted average exercise price |
$ 5.12 ===== |
$ 5.85 ===== |
$ 6.76 ===== |
11. SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company applies the provisions of FAS 131 "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information." The Company has two reportable segments: tubing products and QuikWater, representing the Company's two strategic business units offering different products. The Company internally evaluates its business by facility, however, because of the similar economic characteristics of the tubing operations, including the nature of products, processes and customers, those operations have been aggregated for segment reporting purposes. The tubing products segment manufactures as well as distributes tubular products principally made of carbon and stainless steel. QuikWater manufactures a patented direct contact, high efficiency water heater.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. In fiscal 2001, the Company changed its measure of segment profit or loss to earnings before interest and income taxes ("EBIT") versus income before income taxes. Segment profit(loss) for fiscal 2000 and 1999 have been restated accordingly. Information about the Company's segments is as follows:
Tubing Products |
|
Total |
||
(Dollars in Thousands) |
||||
Fiscal year-ended July 31, 2001: |
||||
Net sales |
$ 148,279 |
$ 3,481 |
$ 151,760 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
6,140 |
48 |
6,188 |
|
Segment profit (loss) |
2,314 |
(175) |
2,139 |
|
Segment assets |
118,638 |
1,217 |
119,855 |
|
Capital expenditures |
6,478 |
9 |
6,487 |
|
Fiscal year-ended July 31, 2000: |
||||
Net sales (1) |
142,293 |
2,648 |
144,941 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
5,512 |
398 |
5,910 |
|
Segment profit (loss) |
4,822 |
(2,476) |
2,346 |
|
Segment assets |
119,970 |
1,398 |
121,368 |
|
Capital expenditures |
10,401 |
61 |
10,462 |
|
Fiscal year-ended July 31, 1999: |
||||
Net sales (1) |
135,058 |
3,523 |
138,581 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
5,008 |
150 |
5,158 |
|
Segment profit (loss) |
7,084 |
(1,520) |
5,564 |
|
Segment assets |
110,000 |
3,396 |
113,396 |
|
Capital expenditures |
12,495 |
60 |
12,555 |
(1) Net sales figures have been adjusted to reflect the Company's change in accounting for freight expense to include it as a cost of sales rather than as a reduction of revenue. The reclassification had no effect on segment profit (loss).
A reconciliation of the Company's segment information to the consolidated financial statements is as follows:
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
|
(Dollars in Thousands) |
|||
Total segment profit |
$ 2,139 |
$ 2,346 |
$ 5,564 |
Costs not allocated to segments: |
|||
Interest expense |
4,731 |
3,992 |
2,552 |
Total income (loss) before income taxes |
$ (2,592) |
$ (1,646) |
$ 3,012 ====== |
Total assets reported for segments |
$ 119,855 |
$ 121,368 |
$ 113,396 |
Assets not allocated to segments: |
|||
Current assets |
3,479 |
4,115 |
3,482 |
Notes receivable and other assets |
5,013 |
4,640 |
3,603 |
Total assets: |
$ 128,347 ====== |
$ 130,123 ====== |
$ 120,481 ====== |
12. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In October 1995, the Company entered into an agreement with an entity owned by the majority stockholders to subcontract certain manufacturing services. Beginning in late 2000, the Company contracted with the same entity to subcontract the production of the QuikWater units. Payments made by the Company under the agreements totaled $603,000 and $506,000 in fiscal 2001 and 2000, respectively. In addition, the Company had a receivable balance of $988,000 and $949,000 at July 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively, for amounts paid on behalf of this entity.
The Company purchases certain specialty packaging and shipping materials from an entity owned by the principal stockholder. Payments made by the Company totaled $28,000 in fiscal 2001 and $163,000 in fiscal 2000. In addition, the Company had a receivable balance of $22,000 and $1,000 at July 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively, for amounts paid on behalf of this entity.
The Company leases its distribution facility in Nederland, Texas from an entity owned by certain Company executives. The amount of the monthly lease payments was determined at the beginning of the lease by an independent evaluation. During 2001, 2000 and 1999, lease expense under the agreement totaled $64,800 in each year.
Advances were made from time to time during fiscal 1998 and prior years (none during 1999-2001) to the principal stockholder with the highest amounts outstanding being $1,200,000 in 2001 and 2000. The balance outstanding at July 31, 2001 and 2000, was $1,200,000. The advance is evidenced by a one-year promissory note from the principal stockholder and is collateralized by Company stock. The note bears interest at the prevailing rate under the Companys loan agreement with its primary lender and is payable at maturity of the note on August 15, 2002. Accrued interest on the note receivable was $594,000 and $489,000 at July 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively, and is included in other assets in the accompanying balance sheets.
Other advances on various terms were made to certain executives prior to fiscal 2000, with the highest amount outstanding being $601,000 in 2001 and 2000. The balance outstanding at July 31, 2001 and 2000, was $601,000. Certain of the advances are collateralized by shares of the Company's common stock. Accrued interest on the notes receivable from related parties totaled $19,000 and $61,000 at July 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively, and is included in other assets in the accompanying balance sheets.
WEBCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
SUPPLEMENTAL CONSOLIDATED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA
(UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Quarters Ended
October 31,
January 31,
April 30,
July 31,
Total
2000
2001
2001
2001
Year
Quarters Ended
October 31,
January 31,
April 30,
July 31,
Total
1999
2000
2000
2000
Year
(1) Quarterly net sales figures have been adjusted to reflect the Company's change in accounting for freight expense to include it as a cost of sales rather than as a reduction of revenue. The reclassification had no effect on gross profit or net income (loss). The reclassification to net sales for the fiscal 2001 quarters ended October 31, January 31, and April 30 was $1,038, $1,261 and $1,184, respectively. The reclassification to net sales for the fiscal 2000 quarters ended October 31, January 31, April 30 and July 31 was $975, $894, $1,099 and $1,053, respectively.
(2) Includes a special item: asset write-off of $1,400,000 of certain QuikWater fixed assets and unamortized patent and goodwill costs along with certain tubing equipment.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
There have been no changes in or disagreements between the Company and its independent auditors.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The information required by this item is hereby incorporated by reference from the Company's definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") within 120 days of the end of the Company's fiscal year.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this item is hereby incorporated by reference from the Company's definitive proxy statement for the annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Commission within 120 days of the end of the Company's fiscal year.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The information required by this item is hereby incorporated by reference from the Company's definitive proxy statement for the annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Commission within 120 days of the end of the Company's fiscal year.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information required by this item is hereby incorporated by reference from the Company's definitive proxy statement for the annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Commission within 120 days of the end of the Company's fiscal year.
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS
ON FORM 8-K
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report:
(1) Financial Statements of Webco Industries, Inc.
which are included in Part II,
Item 8:
Reports of
Independent Accountants
Consolidated Balance
Sheets as of July 31, 2001 and 2000
Consolidated Statements
of Operations for each of the three years in the period ended July 31, 2001
Consolidated Statements
of Stockholders' Equity for each of the three years in the period ended July 31, 2001
Consolidated Statements
of Cash Flows for each of the three years in the period ended July 31, 2001
Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements
Supplemental
Consolidated Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
(2) Financial Statement Schedule:
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
(3) Exhibits:
Exhibit
Number Description
3 (i) Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i) to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1, No. 33-72994).
3 (ii) By-Laws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii) to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1, No.33-72994).
10.1 Form of 1994 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8,No. 333-49219).
10.2 Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of July 15, 1997, between American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, as agent, certain financial institutions as lender, and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Form 10-K dated July 31, 1997, File No. 0-23242).
10.3 Amendment No. 1 and Waiver Agreement to Loan and Security Agreement dated July 15, 1997, between American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, as agent, certain financial institutions as lender, and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Form 10-K dated July 31, 1998, File No.0-23242).
10.4 Lease, dated
October 22, 1996, between the Company and Baker Performance Chemicals Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Form 10-K dated July 31, 1997, File No.0-23242).10.5 Employment Agreement dated December 31, 1996, between the Company and F. William Weber (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Form 10-K dated July 31, 1997, File No. 0-23242).
10.6 Employment Agreement dated December 31, 1996, between the Company and Dana S. Weber (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's Form 10-K dated July 31, 1997, File No. 0-23242).
10.7 Employment Agreement dated June 30, 1998, between Phillips & Johnston, Inc., the Company and Christopher L. Kowalski (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company's Form 10-K dated July 31, 1998, File No.0-23242).
10.8 Lease, dated March 16, 1998, between the Company and Tubular Properties, Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company's Form 10-K dated July 31, 1998, File No. 0-23242).
10.9 Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated as of June 29, 1998 by and among Webco Industries, Inc., P&J Acquisition Corp., Phillips & Johnston, Inc., Christopher L Kowalski and Robert N. Pressly (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company's Form 8-K, File No. 0-23242).
10.10 Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of April 9, 1997, between American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, as agent, certain financial institutions as lender, and Phillips & Johnston, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company's Form 10-K dated July 31, 1998, File No. 0-23242).
10.11 Loan Agreement, dated December 1, 1998, between Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority and Webco Industries, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated January 31, 1999, File No. 0-23242).
10.12 Reimbursement Agreement, dated as of December 1, 1998, between American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago and Webco Industries, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated January 31, 1999, File No. 0-23242).
10.13 Amendment No. 2 to Loan and Security Agreement dated July 15, 1997, between American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, as agent, certain financial institutions as lender, and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Company's Form 10-Q dated January 31, 1999, File No. 0-23242).
10.14 Amendment No. 5 to Loan and Security Agreement dated July 15, 1997, between American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, as agent, certain financial institutions as lender, and the Company.
23.1 Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
(b)
Reports on Form 8-K:
None
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
WEBCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
October 26, 2001
By: /s/ F.
William Weber
F. William Weber
Chairman, Chief Executive
Officer and Director
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
October 26, 2001
By: /s/ F.
William Weber
F. William Weber
Chairman, Chief Executive
Officer and Director
October 26, 2001
By: /s/ Dana
S. Weber
Dana S. Weber
President, Chief Operating Officer
and Director
October 26, 2001
By: /s/
Michael P. Howard
Michael P. Howard
Chief Financial Officer
October 26, 2001
By: /s/
Christopher L. Kowalski
Christopher L. Kowalski
President-Phillips & Johnston, Inc.
and Director
October 26, 2001
By: /s/
Frederick C. Ermel
Frederick C. Ermel
Director
October 26, 2001
By: /s/
Kenneth E. Case
Kenneth E. Case
Director
October 26, 2001
By: /s/
Bradley S. Vetal
Bradley S. Vetal
Director
WEBCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
For the Three Years Ended July 31, 2001
Additions |
||||||
Description |
Balance at Beginning of Period |
Charged to Costs and Expenses |
Charged to Other Accounts |
(1) Deductions |
Balance at End of Period |
|
Allowance for bad debts: | ||||||
1999 | 179 |
45 |
- |
(7) |
217 |
|
2000 | 217 |
35 |
- |
(15) |
237 |
|
2001 | 237 |
387 |
- |
(4) |
620 |
|
Reserve for inventory | ||||||
Obsolescence: | ||||||
1999 | 1,180 |
261 |
- |
(850) |
591 |
|
2000 | 591 |
360 |
- |
(385) |
566 |
|
2001 | 566 |
792 |
- |
(505) |
853 |