SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

[ X ] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003

OR

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition period from ______ to ______

Commission File Number 0-23078
MAPINFO CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

One Global View
Troy, New York 12180
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (518) 285-6000
___________________
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of The Act:     None

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of The Act:
     Common Stock, $.002 Par Value Per Share

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes X      No _____

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K X   

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).

Yes_____     No X   

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $45,985,650 based on the closing price of the Common Stock on the Nasdaq National Market on March 31, 2003.

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant's common stock, $.002 par value per share as of November 17, 2003 was 15,644,639.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

This Annual Report on Form 10-K, including this Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains forward-looking statements regarding future events and the Company's future results that are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts, and projections about the industries in which MapInfo operates and the beliefs and assumptions of the Company's management. In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, any statements that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements, including but not limited to statements: as to the Company's plans for its business, the sufficiency of funds to meet operating requirements for the next 12 months; the Company's expansion of facilities in Troy, New York and the projected vacancy rate of those facilities; the impact of the Company's operating-cost reduction measures; the intended use of the common stock repurchased under the common stock repurchase program; the potential imp act of accounting policies and pronouncements on the Company's future financial reports and results; the ability of the Company to maintain and renew its credit facility and the impact of the Thompson acquisition. Without limiting the foregoing, the words "believes," "anticipates," "plans," "expects," and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that these forward-looking statements are only predictions and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual results may differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. Readers should review carefully the risks and uncertainties identified below under the caption "Outlook: Issues and Risks". We undertake no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason.

PART I

ITEM 1.     BUSINESS     

GENERAL

MapInfo Corporation (the "Company", "MapInfo", or "we") is a global software company that integrates software, data and services to help customers realize greater value from location-based information and drive more insightful decisions. MapInfo understands that all organizations maintain information about the location of their own customers, stores or assets. Using even the most basic location-based information, such as addresses, area codes or postal codes, MapInfo's customers can use MapInfo solutions to analyze patterns, relationships and trends. Location-based analysis reveals intelligence that may not be easily recognized using traditional analysis methods. Better analysis leads to better intelligence ― a competitive advantage in today's challenging business environment.

Organizations in many industry sectors around the world use MapInfo technology and expertise. Companies in the private sector, including in the telecommunications, financial services, insurance, retail, restaurant and real estate markets, use the Company's products and services for marketing, customer service, risk analysis, sales territory alignment, site selection and routing. In the public sector, government agencies use MapInfo technology to improve public safety, crime analysis and emergency preparedness and response. Industry leaders Agilent Technologies, Cognos, Oracle and Siebel Systems integrate MapInfo's solutions with theirs to meet growing market demand for their own decision-support tools that leverage location-based information.

MapInfo develops solutions directly and also works with its reseller channel and industry partners to create solutions that may be customized for particular customers. The Company markets its solutions through a worldwide network comprised of a direct and field sales organization, reseller channel, systems integrators and distributors. The Company's solutions are deployable in combination with all major database technologies, including those of Oracle, IBM and Microsoft.

As part of the Company's growth strategy, management continually assesses potential acquisitions that would integrate into the Company's business model and expand the Company's presence in its target markets. As a result, in January 2003, MapInfo added critical mass to its predictive analytics business, and strengthened its presence in the United States retail, restaurant and real estate sectors with the acquisition of Thompson Associates, a leader in retail market analytics. The combined expertise of MapInfo and Thompson provides a suite of predictive site, market and customer profiling solutions designed to help retailers outperform their competition and maximize opportunities for profitable return on investment. Specifically, MapInfo's solutions enable retailers to improve their real estate strategies by identifying the unique factors that are the most significant drivers of their sales, thereby helping them to capitalize on profitable opportunities anywhere in the world. Experts in the retail industry, T hompson Associates' expertise in the retail industry and strong reputation in analytical research coupled with MapInfo's location-based solutions and worldwide data offers customers more comprehensive solutions that integrate software, data and modeling expertise.

MapInfo's corporate headquarters is in Troy, New York, and the Company is incorporated in the state of Delaware. The Company's Internet address is www.mapinfo.com. The contents of this website are not part of this annual report on Form 10-K, and the Company's internet address is included in this document as an inactive textural reference only. The Company makes available, free of charge through its website, its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and each amendment to these reports on the same day it files such material with, or furnishes it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. Each such report is posted on the Company's website or available via a direct link to the Company's filings on the Securities and Exchange Commission EDGAR system.

STRATEGIC BUSINESS UNITS

From April 2002 through fiscal year 2003, MapInfo organized its sales and marketing and some engineering activities into three strategic business units designed to focus the Company's operating resources on specific customer needs:

Please refer to Note 15 of the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements for financial information regarding each of these segments.

For fiscal year 2004 and beyond, MapInfo is organized around vertical markets, where MapInfo can build on its domain expertise and where location is critical to helping customers achieve their strategic objectives. These vertical markets include, communications, public sector, retail, restaurant, real estate, financial services, and insurance. To ensure that the Company is directing its energies toward meeting customer needs at all times, management has established teams that bring together sales, marketing, services and product management. With this structure, the Company is now able to deepen long-standing customer partnerships and create new relationships, while enhancing its expertise in target markets and delivering focused solutions.

GEOGRAPHIC BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION

In addition to the strategic business units, the Company conducts business globally and manages geographically. The Company's reportable geographic business segments are the Americas, EAME (Europe, Africa and the Middle East) and Asia-Pacific. For further information regarding geographic business segments see Note 15 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements below. For risks associated with conducting business internationally see "Risks associated with international operations" in Item 7 of Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, below.

PRODUCTS AND SERVICES

MapInfo has an extensive offering portfolio that combines software applications, software development tools, data, services and vertical market offerings. The Company's engineering approach is founded on state-of-the-art coding, open standards and quality assurance standards, multiplatform Java^™, .Net and Windows^®, as well as Internet deployment and integration with leading database environments.

Core Products

The ability to visualize data associated with customer location on interactive maps is at the core of MapInfo's offerings. The following core products may be used independently or may serve as the platform for vertical market offerings. The solutions and core products listed below are either owned by MapInfo or licensed by other companies for distribution by MapInfo.

MapInfo's geocoding and address matching products are marketed in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands, Italy, Sweden, Finland, France, Australia and Spain.

MapInfo's Java^™-based direction engine allows organizations to create customized applications for routing people, products and resources.

The Company, in alliance with various data partners around the world, offers a wide selection of data, including streets, boundaries, demographic data and industry-specific data.

MapInfo offers software-based solutions that integrate with MapInfo data products and MapInfo's services to provide solutions that focus on solving specific customer problems and draw on the Company's technical core competencies.

- -Enterprise

Large organizations with thousands of employees operating in multi-geographical locations with assets spread across the globe are faced with improving operations and leveraging existing infrastructure.

- -Vertical Solutions

MapInfo has created offerings that enhance and support homeland security programs, risk management and network management decisions for effective planning and informed decision-making.

Meeting the needs of the retail, restaurant, real estate, financial services and media markets with comprehensive site selection and target marketing solutions, accurate and reliable demographic data and state-of-the-art modeling services.

Services

A fundamental element of MapInfo's business strategy is the ability to integrate software, data and services to help customers drive more insightful decisions. MapInfo's Professional Services Group (PSG) works closely with MapInfo customers to design, develop and implement customized solutions, as well as provide a variety of consulting and technical services. MapInfo services include: needs assessment, system design, application code review, development, installation, training and deployment. In addition, MapInfo's solutions include a wide range of software development, such as prototype development and software integration. The PSG's application development services range from requirements and planning to comprehensive turnkey enterprise solutions.

MapInfo-Thompson Predictive Analytics team provides analytical services that deliver customer and real estate focused models and solutions for the retail, restaurant and financial services industries. These services are the cornerstone of the MapInfo-Thompson Predictive Analytics solutions and business.

The software industry is characterized by extremely rapid changes in technology, which require continuous expenditure on product research and development to enhance existing products and create new products. The Company believes timely development of new products and ongoing enhancements to existing products is essential to maintain its competitive position in the marketplace. The Company is committed to an open system, standards-based product architecture to provide software products that can be integrated into existing mainstream business environments and be adaptable as environments change.

Most of the Company's software products are developed internally. Internal development allows the Company to maintain close technical control over products in terms of enhancements and modifications based on customer need and allows the Company to create a family of products that provides natural migration paths for customers as their business information needs change. Research and development expense incurred by the Company was $20.4 million, $19.7 million and $19.1 million for the years ended September 30, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

The Company also has an active program of licensing products developed and owned by other parties for distribution by MapInfo. Most such products are licenses to MapInfo in exchange for royalties paid on MapInfo's net revenues from such products. This product-licensing program is an important element of MapInfo's strategy to deliver complete solutions to customers.

The Company has established multiple distribution channels to reach an array of industries while simultaneously addressing specific vertical markets. Distribution channels include an indirect channel of resellers, OEMs and distributors, a corporate accounts sales force and a telemarketing sales group. MapInfo markets its products worldwide through sales offices in North America, the United Kingdom, Germany and Australia, and throughout the rest of Europe and the Asia Pacific region through exclusive and non-exclusive distribution relationships.

The Company's direct and field sales and marketing organization is complemented by a network of partners including resellers, systems integrators, OEMs and distributors who purchase the Company's products at a discount for resale to end users. These partners may provide training, consulting services, application development, customization and data products to end-users. In France and certain other countries outside the United States, the Company has appointed master distributors. Additionally, in Japan, MapInfo has appointed a master distributor in which the Company has a forty-nine percent equity ownership position. These master distributors generally build their own value-added reseller network in addition to directly selling data products and consulting services.

To build corporate brand and identity and generate demand in support of the sales effort, the Company conducts various marketing programs, which include advertising, public relations, trade shows, direct mail, Web-based promotions, online seminars and ongoing communications to customers about new products and services. The Company also offers cooperative advertising and other marketing support to its reseller channel. The Company sponsors annual reseller and user conferences in North America, Europe and the Asia Pacific region.

In addition to desktop applications, the Company has successfully moved with the IT industry into client/server, Web-based applications and wireless.

Approximately twenty to thirty percent of the Company's revenue each quarter is derived from backlog, contracts, or orders received prior to the quarter and the balance is derived from software and data licenses ordered during the quarter.

The Company encounters competition in the United States and foreign markets from various companies in different aspects of our business. Some markets in which the Company competes are maturing, and are characterized by vigorous competition or consolidation of companies with complimentary offerings. Other markets bring new competitors with innovative market offerings or business models.

In the traditional Geographic Information System (GIS) market competitors include Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI), the GIS division of AutoDesk, the GIS division of Intergraph, and others. In recent years the Company has expanded its business into new areas, such as the wireless/mobile and Predictive Analytics markets, developing particular expertise in serving these markets. Competitors in the Predictive Analytics market include Claritas, ESRI Business Information Systems, GeoVue, Buxton, Spatial Re-Engineering Consultants and others. Competitors in the wireless/mobile market include Autodesk, Webraska, Microsoft and others. As the Company moves into new areas, it may also face new competition from entrants focused in these spaces, as well as competition from traditional companies attempting to move into these spaces.

The Company believes that it competes in the traditional GIS market principally on the basis of product features and functionality (including cross-platform availability, interoperability, integration and extensibility), technological expertise, reliability, ease of use and supportability, complimentary spatial data products and technical services. In addition, the Company believes it is differentiated over many competitors in the Predictive Analytics market through intellectual capital and the development of industry-focused solutions that incorporate relevant data with its software to create unique market offerings.

Some of the Company's current and future competition may have significant name recognition, as well as substantially greater capital resources, marketing experience, research and development staffs or production facilities than the Company. Although the Company believes it has both a technology advantage and a superior business model over many existing competitors, maintaining this advantage will require continued investment by the Company in new market offerings. However, no assurance can be given that the Company will be able to compete successfully against current and future competition and that the competitive pressures faced by the Company will not adversely affect its financial performance.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY     

The Company regards its products as proprietary and attempts to protect them with a combination of copyright, trademark, patent and trade secret protections, employee and third-party non-disclosure agreements, and other methods of protection. The Company currently has one issued United States patent that expires in 2018 and five patent applications pending. Despite the Company's precautions, it may be possible for unauthorized third parties to copy certain portions of the Company's products or reverse engineer or obtain and use information the Company regards as proprietary. In the future, litigation may be necessary to enforce and define the scope of the Company's intellectual property rights and to protect its trade secrets. Such litigation could be costly and have a material adverse effect upon the Company's financial condition.

While the Company's competitive position may be affected by its ability to protect its proprietary information, the Company believes that such protections are less significant to the Company's success than other factors, such as the knowledge, ability and experience of its personnel, MapInfo name recognition and ongoing product development and support.

The Company supplies MapInfo software products primarily under shrinkwrap licenses. Shrinkwrap licenses are not negotiated with or signed by individual licensees and take effect upon the opening of the product package. Certain provisions of such licenses, including provisions protecting against unauthorized use, copying, transfer and disclosure of the license program, may be unenforceable under the laws of certain jurisdictions. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect the Company's proprietary rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. In some regions of the world, MapInfo protects its products against unauthorized copying by the use of software copy protection and other engineered methods.

As the number of products offered by the Company grows, the Company expects that the risk of lawsuits involving software product developers will also grow. There can be no assurance that third parties will not bring infringement claims against the Company in the future with respect to the Company's current or future products. Any such claim could require the Company to enter into royalty arrangements or result in costly litigation. If the Company were subject to such an infringement claim and that claim was successful, there can be no assurance that the Company would be able to obtain commercially acceptable licenses or to develop independently the technology necessary to preserve, enhance and grow its portfolio of software and data products. If a product infringement claim against the Company were successful, the Company's business, operating results and financial condition could be materially affected.

Certain of the technology included in the Company's products is licensed from third parties. If these licenses terminate for any reason, the Company would be required to seek alternative licenses or modify its product offerings, which could adversely affect the Company's business.

MapInfo, the MapInfo Meridian Logo, MapInfo Professional, MapXtreme, MapInfo MapX, MapMarker, MapXtend, MapInfo Discovery, CallingAreaInfo, CallPlanFinder, ExchangeInfo, MarketMath, miAware, miConnect, miFriends, miGuide, miLists, miTrip, miWhereAmI, PSAP Pro, PSYTE, RateCenterInfo, SpatialWare and TargetPro are trademarks of MapInfo Corporation and/or its affiliated companies.

The Company had 708 full-time employees on September 30, 2003, of which 410 were employed in the United States and 298 were employed in the Company's international operations. Of the 708 employees, 193 were in research and development, 401 were in sales, marketing, and service activities (training, technical support and consulting) and 114 were in general and administrative positions. The Company's employees are not represented by any collective bargaining organization and the Company has never experienced a work stoppage. The Company believes that its relations with its employees are good.

ITEM 2.     PROPERTIES

In October 2002, the Company moved to a newly constructed 150,000 square foot facility, in the Rensselaer Technology Park in Troy, New York. This new facility is adjacent to a 60,000 square foot facility, which the Company leases, known as One Global View. The lease on the 60,000 square foot facility expires in 2006. These offices house the corporate headquarters, the principal research and development center and the principal sales, marketing and administrative staff for the United States and Latin America. The Company leases office space of approximately 25,000 square feet in Ann Arbor, Michigan, which houses sales and support staff. The lease on this facility expires in 2005. The Company leases office space of approximately 23,000 square feet in Windsor, England, which houses the European headquarters. The lease on this facility expires in 2012. The Company leases office space of approximately 41,000 square feet in Toronto, Canada, which houses a research and development center, as well as sales, marketin g and support staff. The lease on the facility expires in 2014. In addition, the Company leases nine sales offices in the United States, two sales offices in Canada, five sales offices in Europe and three sales offices in Australia. The Company also owns a sales office in Brisbane, Australia.

ITEM 3.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On August 5, 2002, the Company filed an action against Spatial Re-Engineering Consultants, or SRC, a former MapInfo reseller, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York to collect approximately $100,000 in receivables owed by SRC to the Company under contractual obligations. SRC answered and asserted fifteen counterclaims against the Company, seeking a total of $11.0 million dollars in damages. The counterclaims include allegations of breach of contract and copyright infringement. The District Court dismissed one counterclaim upon the Company's motion and SRC voluntarily withdrew a second counterclaim; thirteen counterclaims remain. In its pleadings on the remaining counterclaims SRC seeks a total of $9.0 million. However, in its computation of damages made pursuant to court rules, SRC has alleged general damages of $5.1 million, plus an unspecified amount of special damages. The Company is vigorously defending against all remaining counterclaims.

ITEM 4.     SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

No matters were submitted to a vote of the Company's security holders during the last quarter of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY

The following table sets forth (i) the name and age of each current executive officer of the Company, (ii) the position(s) currently held by each person named, and (iii) the principal occupations held by each person named for at least the past five years.

Mr. Cavalier has served as Chairman of the Board since February 2002. He served as Co-Chairman from January 2001 to February 2002. He served as Chief Executive Officer from June 2000 to December 2000. He had served as President and Chief Executive Officer from November 1, 1996 to June 2000. From January 1993 to September 1996, Mr. Cavalier served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Antares Alliance Group. Mr. Cavalier is also a director of Focus Enhancements Incorporated.

Mr. Cattini has served as President and Chief Executive Officer since January 2001 and as President and Chief Operating Officer from June 2000 until January 2001. From December 1998 to June 2000, Mr. Cattini served as Group Vice President and General Manager, Americas/European Sales. He had served as Vice President, Sales - The Americas from November 1997 to December 1998. From October 1995 to October 1997, Mr. Cattini served as General Manager for the Company's United Kingdom and West EAME (Europe, Africa and the Middle East) operations. From August 1987 to October 1995, Mr. Cattini held various positions with Lotus Development UK Limited, a software company, including UK Corporate Accounts Sales Manager.

Mr. McDougall has served as Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer since May 2003. From January 2001 to May 2003, he served as Vice President and Controller and from November 1997 to January 2001, Mr. McDougall served as the Company's Controller. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. McDougall was a Business Assurance Manager at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, where he was employed from 1989 to 1997.

Mr. Moon has served as Chief Technology Officer since April 2002. Mr. Moon served as Chief Technology Officer and Group Vice President - Research and Development from December 1999 to April 2002 and as Vice President - Engineering from July 1997 to December 1999. From April 1997 to July 1997, he served as Director of Software Development for the SpatialWare business of the Company. Previously he served as Director of Research and Development for the Spatial Technology Program of Unisys Corporation, a systems integration company, from November 1994 to March 1997.

Mr. Hickey has served as Chief Operating Officer since April 2002. From August 2000 to April 2002, he served as Executive Vice President, Worldwide Sales and Marketing. From June 1995 to August 2000, Mr. Hickey held a number of executive management positions with the Company, most recently as Group Vice President of Operations. Prior to joining MapInfo in 1995, Mr. Hickey worked at AlliedSignal for nine years in various management positions.

Mr. Lennox has served as Group Vice President of Sales and Marketing since January 2003. From April 2002 to January 2003, he served as Group Vice President, Strategic Business Unit Operations. From July 2001 to April 2002, he served as Managing Director, Products and Markets for the Company's Canadian operations. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Lennox served as Managing Director, EAME for DoubleClick International based in Dublin, Republic of Ireland from 2000 to 2001. From 1992 to 2000 Mr. Lennox held various positions in marketing and management in Lotus Development UK Ltd, a software company.

Mr. Tobin has served as Executive Vice President of Human Resources since May 2002. From April 1996 to May 2002, Mr. Tobin held various Human Resource management positions with the Company, most recently as Group Vice President of Human Resources and Administrative Practices. Prior to joining MapInfo, Mr. Tobin served in various Human Resource capacities at RH Macy's, American Maye Products Co. and Trans World Music Corp.

PART II

ITEM 5.     MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK AND
                    RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The Company's Common Stock is listed on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol MAPS. The table below shows the high and low trading prices of the Common Stock for each period indicated.

The Company has never declared or paid cash dividends on its capital stock. The Company does not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future and currently intends to retain all available funds for use in the operation of its business.

The approximate number of holders of record of the Company's Common Stock at November 17, 2003 was 536. This number does not include stockholders for whom shares were held in nominee or "street" name.

ITEM 5.     MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK AND

                    RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS (Continued)

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides information about the securities authorized for issuance under the Company's equity compensation plans as of September 30, 2003:

____________________

1. Excludes shares issuable under the Company's 1993 Employee Stock Purchase Plan in connection with the current offering period, which began September 1, 2003 and ends February 29, 2004.
2. Includes 149 shares issuable under the Company's 1993 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Also includes 910,351 shares issuable under the Company's 2002 Stock Incentive Plan and 11,868 shares issuable under the Company's 1993 Director Stock Option Plan.

ITEM 6.          SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA⁽¹⁾

⁽¹⁾ The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" ("SFAS 142") effective with the Company's fiscal year beginning on October 1, 2001. In accordance with SFAS 142 the Company has ceased amortized goodwill as of October 1, 2001. As a result of SFAS 142, in fiscal 2002, the Company did not recognize goodwill amortization expense that would have been recognized under the previous standards. See Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, below.

In 2003, net revenues increased $13.7 million, or 15%, to $106.3 million, as compared to $92.6 million in fiscal year 2002. The acquisition of Thompson in January 2003 resulted in revenue of $12.8 million during fiscal year 2003. Approximately $11.4 million of the increase was attributable to a 122% increase in service revenue due to the Thompson acquisition and the remaining increase was due to a 3% increase in product revenues. On a geographic basis, revenues in the Americas increased by $9.8 million or 19%; Europe revenues increased by $2.1 million, or 7% (0% on a constant currency basis), and Asia-Pacific revenues increased by $1.8 million, or 15% (3% on a constant currency basis). In the Americas, revenue from product sales decreased 3% and revenues from services increased 217%. The revenue increase in the Americas was primarily attributable to Thompson. In Europe, product revenues increased 7% and revenue from services increased 7%, in each case when compared to the prior year. In the Asia-Pacific regi on, product revenues increased 15% and revenues from services increased 9%, in each case when compared to the prior year. The strengthening of foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar added $4.1 million to revenue for fiscal year 2003 compared to the prevailing exchange rates in the prior year. On a Strategic Business Unit basis, fiscal year 2003 revenue attributed to LBI was $80.8 million, revenue attributed to Predictive Analytics was $24.0 million, and revenue attributed to LBS was $1.4 million. The Company is experiencing a slower rate of adoption of its LBS technology than previously anticipated due to delays in customer implementations.

In 2002, net revenues decreased $17.4 million, or 16%, to $92.6 million, as compared to $110.0 million in fiscal year 2001. Approximately $15.9 million of the decrease was attributable to a 16% decrease in product revenues and $1.5 million was attributable to a 14% decrease in service revenue. On a geographic basis, revenues in the Americas decreased by $14.7 million or 23%; Europe revenues decreased by $3.0 million, or 9% (11% on a constant currency basis), and Asia-Pacific revenues increased by $295 thousand, or 2% (1% on a constant currency basis). In the Americas, product revenues decreased 23% and revenues from services decreased 20%. The revenue decline in the Americas was mainly attributable to reduced spending by telecommunication companies due to the broad decline in telecommunications industry demand. Also affecting revenues in the Americas was the slowing in the rate of new customer acquisition, which the Company believes is due to overall reduced IT spending across the American economy. In Europe , product revenues decreased 9% and revenue from services decreased 10%. Europe was also affected by the slowing in the rate of new customer acquisition, which the Company believes is due to an overall reduction in IT spending across European markets. In the Asia-Pacific region, revenues from services increased 9% and product revenues increased 2%. The increase in Asia-Pacific revenues was mainly attributable to Australia where revenues increased $2.3 million, or 36%, primarily due to the March 2001 acquisition of ERSIS Australia Pty Ltd. Offsetting the

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

increase in Australia were declines in China and Japan of $1.0 million and $700 thousand, respectively. The decline in China reflects reduced sales by the Company's principal distributor. In Japan, the Company changed its distribution model in February 2002 by increasing its ownership in Alps from 17% to 49% and granted Alps exclusive distribution rights in Japan to MapInfo's software products. This enabled the Company to close its sales office in Japan in the June quarter. Under the exclusive distribution agreement, all MapInfo sales in Japan are earned by Alps, which purchases product from MapInfo.

The Americas represented 56%, 54%, and 59% of Company revenues in 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively. Europe represented 31%, 33%, and 30% and Asia-Pacific represented 13%, 13%, and 11% of Company revenues in 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively.

The Company's operating results are affected by exchange rates. See "Other Income, Net," below. Approximately 38%, 41%, and 38% of the Company's revenues were denominated in foreign currencies in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

     Cost of Revenues
     (Dollars in thousands)

Cost of revenues as a percentage of net revenues was 29.8% in fiscal year 2003, an increase of 2.7 percentage points over fiscal year 2002. As a result, the gross profit margin decreased to 70.2% from 72.9% in the prior year. The lower margins in fiscal year 2003 are attributable to increased services revenue primarily due to the Thompson acquisition. Services generally generate a lower gross profit margin than products. Gross profit margin as a percentage of revenue that related to product revenue was 79.4%, 80.3% and 82.8% for 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Gross profit margin as a percentage of revenue that related to services revenue was 32.6%, 6.8% and 8.2% for 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Cost of revenues as a percentage of net revenues was 27.1% in 2002 or an increase of 2.5 percentage points over 2001. As a result, the gross margin decreased to 72.9% in 2002 from 75.4% in 2001. The increase in cost of revenues in 2002 was mainly attributable to the acquisitions of Compusearch and ERS IS, product mix, increased data royalties, and a decline in the gross margin attributable to services.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

     Operating Expenses
     (Dollars in thousands)

Research and development. Research and development (R&D) expenses were $0.7 million or 4% higher in fiscal year 2003 versus 2002. The increase in R&D expense was primarily attributable to the Thompson acquisition. In 2002, R&D expenses were $0.5 million or 3% higher in 2002 versus 2001. The increase in 2002 primarily related to additional R&D efforts in support of the Company's LBS initiative. R&D headcount was 193 (inclusive of nine Thompson employees), 197, and 209, at the end of fiscal 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively. As a percentage of net revenues, R&D expenses were 19.2% in 2003 as compared with 21.2% in 2002 and 17.4% in 2001. Capitalized product development costs were $213 thousand, $280 thousand, and $657 thousand, in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. These amounts represented 1%, 1%, and 3% of total research and development costs in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

Selling and marketing expenses. Selling and marketing expenses increased $2.1 million or 5% in fiscal year 2003 versus 2002. Selling and marketing expenses attributable to the Thompson acquisition were $2.5 million in 2003. Offsetting the increase due to Thompson were headcount reductions and cost savings recognized in Japan, where the Company closed its sales office during the second quarter of fiscal year 2002. Selling and marketing expenses decreased by 10% or $4.3 million in 2002. The decrease in 2002 primarily related to the Americas where selling and marketing expenses decreased approximately $3.0 million, primarily due to a 21-person reduction in sales headcount. The Asia-Pacific region accounted for $1.3 million of the decrease primarily due to headcount reductions as a result of the closing of the sales office in Japan. Sales and marketing headcount was 240 (inclusive of seventeen Thompson employees), 247, and 280, at the end of fiscal 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively. As a percentage o f net revenues, selling and marketing expenses were 38.6%, in 2003 compared to 42.0% in 2002 and 39.3% in 2001.

General and administrative expenses. General and administrative (G&A) expenses increased $2.1 million or 16% in fiscal year 2003 when compared with 2002. Thompson accounted for $600 thousand of the increase and $1.0 million was attributable to severance and restructuring costs. The balance of the increase was due to increased professional fees in fiscal year 2003. G&A expenses decreased $2.9 million or 18% in 2002. Excluding approximately $1.7 million due to the reduction in goodwill amortization as a result the adoption of SFAS 142 "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" effective October 2001, G&A expenses would have decreased 8%. The balance of the decrease related primarily to a reduction in overall spending in areas such as professional fees, travel, supplies, incentive compensation to executives and management, and related benefits costs, among other things, due to concentrated efforts to reduce operating costs. G&A headcount was 114 (inclusive of three Thompson employees), 121, and

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

129 at the end of fiscal 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively. As a percentage of net revenues, G&A expenses were 14.4% in 2003, 14.2% in 2002, and 14.7% in 2001.

     Other Income, net
     (Dollars in thousands)

Interest and other income, net increased $155 thousand in fiscal 2003. This increase was mainly attributable to equity income in the Company's investment in Alps of approximately $897 thousand, and foreign exchange loss, which was $73 thousand in 2003 versus $542 thousand in 2002. Fiscal year 2002 also included an increase to the valuation reserve for the Company's equity investments of $618 thousand versus zero in fiscal year 2003. Offsetting the positive effects noted above, was a decrease of $376 thousand in interest income, an increase of $973 thousand in interest expense, related primarily to the mortgage on the Company's headquarters, and an increase in other expense of $267 thousand versus fiscal year 2002. In addition, fiscal year 2002 also included a gain from the sale of a minority share of an investment of $212 thousand. Other income, net increased $562 thousand in fiscal 2002. The increase in 2002 was primarily attributable to a reduction in the amounts expensed to increase the valuation reserve for the Company's equity investments. In 2002 the Company expensed $580 thousand, versus $1.5 million in 2001, to reduce the carrying value of certain equity investments. In 2002, the valuation reserve for the Company's equity investments related to the Company's investment in Three D Graphics. In addition, the elimination of equity investment goodwill amortization resulted in a favorable variance of approximately $300 thousand. Offsetting the favorable variances was interest income from short-term investments, which decreased by $785 thousand in 2002 resulting from decreased interest rates.

Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes
(Dollars in thousands)

The benefit from income taxes in 2003 and 2002 was increased by research and development credits.

At September 30, 2003, we had net deferred tax assets of $15.3 million, reflecting tax credit carryforwards, net operating losses and other deductible temporary differences, which reduce taxable income in future years. We are required to assess the realization of our deferred tax assets. Significant changes in circumstances may require adjustments during interim periods. Our future tax benefits related to foreign tax credits are fully reserved as it is more likely than not that they will not be realized due to their relatively short carryforward periods. Although realization is not assured, we have concluded that it is more likely than not that the remaining net deferred tax assets will be realized principally based upon forecasted taxable income generally within the twenty-year R&D credit and net operating loss carryforward periods, giving consideration to the substantial benefits realized to date through our restructuring program. The amount of the net deferred tax assets actually realized could vary i f there are differences in the timing or amount of future reversals of existing deferred tax liabilities or changes in the actual amounts of future taxable income. If our forecast is determined to no longer be reliable due to

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

uncertain market conditions or improvement in our results of operations does not continue, our long-term forecast will require reassessment. As a result, we may need to establish additional valuation allowances for all or a portion of the net deferred tax assets.

Financial Condition

The Company's cash and short-term investments totaled $34.8 million at September 30, 2003, and represented 26% of total assets. The portfolio is invested primarily in short-term, investment grade marketable securities. The average maturity of the cash and short-term investments portfolio was 367 days at September 30, 2003.

Net cash generated from operating activities was $6.1 million in 2003 compared to $7.6 million in 2002. The cash generated from operating activities in 2003 included, among other things, $6.5 million in depreciation and amortization and $1.5 million in increased deferred revenues. This cash generation was partially offset by the net loss of $1.1 million and a net decrease in income taxes of $0.6 million. Net cash used for investing activities in 2003 was $14.3 million. Investing activities primarily included: the $12.2 million acquisition of Thompson, $3.4 million in purchases of property and equipment (including $1.1 million for the construction of the new facility in Troy, New York); offset by net cash flows from short-term investments of $2.0 million. Financing activities generated $8.9 million in 2003, due to mortgage proceeds of $4.6 million, term loan proceeds of $3.0 million and proceeds from the exercise of stock options and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan of $2.2 million, offset by principal payment of long-term debt and capital leases of $593 thousand and the repurchase of 47,055 shares of common stock for treasury at an aggregate cost of $268 thousand.

The accounts receivable balance at September 30, 2003 was $23.3 million compared to $18.9 million at September 30, 2002. The increase is due primarily to the acquisition of Thompson in January 2003.

The Company has a $6.0 million credit facility with a bank that expires on March 31, 2004. The Company anticipates that the credit facility will be renewed upon expiration for a one-year period on substantially the same terms. There were no outstanding borrowings under this credit facility at September 30, 2003 or 2002.

On November 26, 2003, the Company agreed to pay Thompson the $6.1 contingent payment pursuant to the terms of the Thompson purchase agreement, $5.1 million of which will be paid on March 1, 2004 and the remaining $1.0 million will be paid on October 1, 2004.

In July 2002, the Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase from time to time up to $10.0 million of the Company's Common Stock on the open market or in negotiated transactions. The repurchase program will remain in effect until September 30, 2004, unless discontinued earlier by the Board of Directors. The Company intends to use the repurchased shares for issuance upon exercise of employee stock options, purchases under the Company's stock purchase plan, or other corporate purposes. The repurchase program will be funded using the Company's working capital. Under the repurchase program, the Company purchased 47,055 shares for $268 thousand in fiscal year 2003 and 250,002 shares for $1.5 million in fiscal year 2002.

Future minimum payments required under loan agreements that have initial or remaining non-cancelable terms in excess of one year as of September 30, 2003 are $1,172 thousand, 2004; $1,172 thousand, 2005; $1,172 thousand, 2006; $458 thousand, 2007; $315 thousand, 2008 and $13,264 thousand thereafter. Future minimum payments required under capital leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of September 30, 2003 are $221 thousand, 2004; $125 thousand, 2005; $125 thousand, 2006; and $264 thousand, 2007. Future minimum rental payments required under

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of September 30, 2003 are $5,296 thousand, 2004; $5,093 thousand, 2005; $4,091 thousand, 2006; $3,371 thousand, 2007; $3,338 thousand, 2008 and $2,181 thousand thereafter. In addition, as of September 30, 2003, the Company had an accrual of $260 thousand for future severance obligations related to the headcount reductions and restructuring actions during fiscal 2003.

For information regarding legal proceedings see Item 2 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Management believes existing cash and short-term investments together with funds generated from operations should be sufficient to meet the Company's operating requirements for the next 12 months. Factors that could adversely affect the Company's liquidity and financial condition include a decrease in revenues, future acquisitions, the stock repurchase program, failure to renew or replace the Company's credit facility and failure to achieve anticipated cost savings as a result of the Company's restructuring during fiscal year 2003.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

During fiscal year 2003, the Company did not engage in:

• material off-balance sheet activities, including the use of structured finance or special purpose entities,
• material trading activities in non-exchange traded commodity contracts, or
• material transactions with persons or entities that benefit from their non-independent relationship with the Company.

New Accounting Standards

In May 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 150 ("SFAS No. 150"), "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity." SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. SFAS No. 150 requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within the scope of SFAS No. 150 as a liability. SFAS No. 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective for the Company beginning October 1, 2003. The Company is currently assessing the financial impact of SFAS No. 150 on its financial statements.

In April 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 149 ("SFAS No. 149"), Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." SFAS No. 149 amends and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts (collectively referred to as derivatives) and for hedging activities under SFAS No. 133. SFAS No. 149 is effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003, and hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003, except for those provisions of SFAS No. 149 that relate to SFAS No. 133 Implementation issues already effective for fiscal quarters that began prior to June 15, 2003. For these latter issues, the provisions that are currently in effect should continue to be applied in accordance with their respective effective dates. Certain provisions of SFAS No. 149, that relate to forward purchases or sales of when-issued securities or other securi ties that do not yet exist should be applied to both existing contracts and new contracts entered into after June 30, 2003. The adoption of SFAS 149 did not have a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities" ("FIN 46"). This interpretation explains how to identify variable interest entities and how an enterprise assesses its interest in a variable interest entity to decide whether to consolidate that entity. This interpretation requires existing unconsolidated variable interest entities to be consolidated by their primary beneficiaries if the entities do not effectively disperse risks among parties involved. Variable interest entities that effectively disperse risks will not be consolidated unless a single party holds an interest or combination of interest that effectively recombines risks that were previously dispersed. This interpretation applies immediately to variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003, and to variable interest entities in which an enterprise obtains an interest after that date. It applies in the first fiscal year or interim period ending after December 15, 2003, to variab le interest entities in which an enterprise holds a variable interest that it acquired before February 1, 2003. The Company is currently assessing the financial impact of FIN 46 on its financial statements.

In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45, "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others" ("FIN 45"). FIN 45 elaborates on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued. It also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. FIN 45 does not prescribe a specific approach for subsequently measuring the guarantor's recognized liability over the term of the related guarantee. FIN 45 incorporates without change, the guidance in FASB Interpretation No. 34, "Disclosure of Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others", which is being superseded. The initial recognition and initial measurement provisions of FIN 45 are applicable on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after Decemb er 31, 2002, irrespective of the guarantor's fiscal year-end. The disclosure requirements in FIN 45 are effective for financial statements of interim or annual periods ending after December 15, 2002. The adoption of this statement does not have a material impact on the Company's financial statements. Subject to certain limitations, the Company agrees to indemnify its customers against any damages, liabilities, costs and expenses arising out of any claim that a MapInfo product infringes the intellectual property right of a third party. The Company has never incurred costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification agreements. Accordingly, the Company believes the liability for these agreements as of September 30, 2003 is not material.

In June 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB") issued Statement No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities" ("SFAS No. 146"), which replaces Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") Issue No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)." Under SFAS No. 146, liabilities for costs associated with an exit or disposal activity are to be recognized when the liability is incurred, while under EITF Issue No. 94-3, liabilities related to exit or disposal activities were recognized when an entity committed to an exit plan. SFAS No. 146 establishes that the objective for the initial measurement of the liability is fair value. SFAS No. 146 is effective for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. The Company does not expect this statement to have a material impact on its financial statements.

Outlook: Issues and Risks

In addition to the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the following issues and risks, among others, should be considered in evaluating MapInfo's outlook and future.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

Variability of quarterly operating results. The Company's quarterly operating results may vary significantly from quarter to quarter, depending upon factors such as the introduction and market acceptance of new products and new versions of existing products, the ability to reduce expenses or increase revenues at a level sufficient to offset increases in expenses, the level of technology spending, and the activities of competitors. Because a high percentage of the Company's expenses are relatively fixed in the near term, minor variations in the timing of orders and shipments can cause significant variations in quarterly operating results. The Company operates with little or no backlog and has no long-term contracts; substantially all of its product revenues in each quarter result from software and data licenses issued in that quarter. Accordingly, the Company's ability to accurately forecast future revenues and income for any period is necessarily limited. Also, the Company could experience reduced rev enues from telecommunications and Internet companies as a result of decreased spending in those industries.

Potential volatility of stock price. There has been, and will likely continue to be, significant volatility in the market price of securities of technology companies, including the Company. Factors such as announcements of new products by the Company or its competitors, litigation involving the Company, quarterly fluctuations in the Company's financial results or other software companies' financial results, shortfalls in the Company's actual financial results compared to results previously forecasted by stock market analysts, the Company's stock repurchase program, and general conditions in the software industry and conditions in the financial markets could cause the market price of the Company's Common Stock to fluctuate substantially. These market fluctuations may adversely affect the price of the Company's Common Stock. Such a decline could adversely impact the ability of the Company to attract and retain employees, acquire other companies or businesses and raise capital.

Effects of economic slowdown. The stock market decline and broad economic slowdown have affected the demand for software products and related services, lengthened sales cycles and decreased technology spending for many of the Company's customers and potential customers. These events have adversely impacted the Company's revenues since 2001, particularly in the United States, and could have a material effect on the Company in the future, including without limitation, on the Company's future revenues and earnings.

New products and technological change. The mapping software and information business is characterized by extremely rapid technological change, evolving industry standards, and frequent new product introductions. These conditions require continuous expenditures on product research and development to enhance existing products and to create new products. The Company believes that the timely development of new products and continuing enhancements to existing products is essential to maintain its competitive position in the marketplace. During recent years, the Company began to increasingly focus on its Predictive Analytics and LBS businesses and introduced a number of new or substantially updated releases of products, including Routing J Server, TargetProâ , miAwareä , MapInfo Professionalâ for Microsoftâ SQL Serverä and MapInfo Discoveryä . The Company's future success depends, in part, upon customer and market acceptance of these new products and initiatives. The Company's LBS products have achieved a lower acceptance rate than was anticipated. Any failure to achieve increased acceptance of these and other new product offerings could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business and results of operations. There can be no assurance that the Company will successfully complete the development of new or enhanced products or successfully manage transitions from one product release to the next.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

Risks associated with international operations. Revenues outside the United States represented approximately 53% of total Company revenues in fiscal year 2003. The international portion of the Company's business is subject to a number of inherent risks, including the difficulties in building and managing international operations, reliance on financial commitments from certain international distributors, difficulties in localizing products and translating documentation into foreign languages, fluctuations in import/export duties and quotas, and regulatory, economic, or political changes in international markets. The Company's operating results are also affected by exchange rates. Approximately 38% of the Company's revenues in fiscal year 2003 were denominated in foreign currencies. Changes in international business conditions could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business and results of operations.

Intellectual property rights. The Company regards its software as proprietary and attempts to protect it with a combination of copyright, trademark and trade secret protections, employee and third-party non-disclosure agreements, patents and other methods of protection. Despite these precautions, it may be possible for unauthorized third parties to copy certain portions of the Company's products, reverse engineer or obtain and use information the Company regards as proprietary. In addition, the Company's shrink-wrap licenses, under which the Company licenses its products, may be unenforceable under the laws of certain jurisdictions. Also, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect the Company's proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. Any misappropriation of the Company's intellectual property could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business and results of operations. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that third parties will not assert infringem ent claims against the Company in the future with respect to current or future products. Any such assertion could require the Company to enter into royalty arrangements or result in costly litigation.

Effect of reduced demand and uncertainties in the telecommunications industry. The telecommunications industry is experiencing continuing consolidation of industry participants. As a result, the Company's operating results could continue to become increasingly dependent on a smaller number of telecommunication customers. Also, continuing declines in capital spending by telecommunications companies may result in a lengthening of customers' decision cycles and a reduction in orders. Revenues from telecommunication customers accounted for approximately 20% of the Company's net revenues in fiscal year 2003. Significant further reductions in orders from the telecommunication industry could have a material adverse effect on MapInfo's operating results and financial condition.

Risks associated with cost reduction measures. During the year ended September 30, 2003, the Company restructured its operations, including decreasing headcount on its base business, excluding Thompson, by approximately sixty-three employees. During restructuring operations in fiscal year 2002, the Company had decreased headcount by approximately ninety employees. The restructuring and reductions in force could have an adverse impact on the Company's business, including its ability to attract and retain customers or employees, and the timing of release of new products and services. The Company cannot provide any assurance that restructuring will achieve the desired financial benefits, nor can the Company provide any assurance that the reduction in headcount will not have an adverse impact on its business or future operating results.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

Competition. The Company encounters significant competition in the market for business mapping systems worldwide. Some of the Company's competition may have significant name recognition, as well as substantially greater capital resources, marketing experience, research and development staffs and production facilities than the Company. Increased competition may lead to pricing pressures that could adversely affect the Company's gross margins. Prices of software in Europe and Asia are generally higher than in the Americas to cover localization costs and higher costs of distribution. Such price uplifts could erode in the future.

Reliance on third parties. The Company relies in part on resellers and independent developers for the development of specialized data products that use MapInfo software. Failure by such resellers or independent developers to continue to develop such data products, or changes in the contractual arrangements with such resellers or independent developers, could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business and results of operations.

Prices. Future prices the Company is able to obtain for its products may decrease from previous levels depending upon market or competitive pressures or distribution channel factors. Any decrease could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business and results of operations.

Cost of revenues. Cost of revenues varies with the mix of technology development and licensing fees, product revenues, services revenues and services utilization rates, as well as with the distribution channel mix. Changes in the revenue mix, including due to an increasing percentage of sales attributable to services, as well as changes in the distribution model, may affect cost of revenues as a percentage of net revenues in the future.

Risks associated with distribution channels. The Company primarily markets and distributes its products in North America, Europe and Australia through the Company's telesales, outside sales force and through third-party resellers. In the rest of the Asia-Pacific region, the Company's products are marketed and distributed through exclusive and non-exclusive distribution relationships. While the Company has contractual agreements with such resellers and distributors, these entities are not employees of the Company and the Company, accordingly, cannot control their continued performance. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to retain its current resellers and distributors, that the resellers and distributors will perform to the Company's expectations, or that the Company will be able to expand its distribution channels by entering into arrangements with new resellers and distributors in the Company's current markets or in new markets.

Risks associated with acquisitions and investments. The Company has made a number of acquisitions and investments, including its acquisition of Thompson in January 2003, and will continue to review future acquisition and investment opportunities. No assurances can be given that acquisition candidates will continue to be available on terms and conditions acceptable to the Company. Acquisitions, including the Thompson acquisition, involve numerous risks, including, among other things, possible decreases in capital resources or dilution to existing shareholders, difficulties and expenses incurred in connection with the acquisitions and the subsequent assimilation of the operations and services or products of the acquired companies, the difficulty of operating new businesses, the diversion of management's attention from other business concerns, a limited ability to predict future operating results of an acquired business and the potential loss of key employees and customers of the acquired company. In the event that the operations of an acquired business do not meet expectations, the Company may be required to restructure the acquired business or write-off the value of some or all of the assets of the acquired business. There can be

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

no assurance that Thompson or any other acquisition will be successfully integrated into the Company's operations or will have the intended financial or strategic results.

Risks associated with reliance on services revenue. The Company has increased its services business with the acquisition of Thompson during fiscal year 2003. Services revenue comprised 20% of total revenue in fiscal year 2003 versus 10% in fiscal year 2002. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to continue to increase or maintain this level of services revenue. Loss of any large customer in the services business could have an adverse impact on the Company.

Risks associated with financing activities. In addition, any financing activities undertaken by the Company, whether to fund acquisitions, operations, growth, or otherwise, could adversely affect the Company's financial condition or results or result in dilution to existing stockholders. Additional loans could require the Company to pay a greater amount of interest. The sale of stock would result in dilution to existing stockholders. Any financing transaction could result in the Company becoming subject to covenants that could impede the Company's ability to manage its operations, raise additional capital or undertake acquisitions or other strategic transactions.

Risks associated with expansion of facilities. In October 2002, the Company completed the construction of a 150,000 square foot facility in Troy, New York. The Company also occupies a 60,000 square foot facility, adjacent to the newly constructed facility, which is currently leased through 2006. The 60,000 square foot facility principally houses the Company's U.S.-based research and development organization. The 150,000 square foot facility was occupied in October 2002 and houses the Company's corporate offices and the U.S. sales, marketing and administrative organizations. Approximately 30-35% of the newly constructed office space is vacant, and the Company is seeking to sublease this vacant space. The Company is also examining its options concerning the consolidation of office space in Troy, New York. There can be no assurance the Company will grow at a rate sufficient to fully utilize the Troy office space or will be able to sublease excess office space.

Reliance on attracting and retaining key employees. The Company's continued success will depend in large part on its ability to attract and retain highly qualified technical, managerial, sales and marketing, executive, and other personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to continue to attract or retain such personnel. Loss of key personnel or changes in management could have an adverse impact on the Company.

Risks associated with litigation. See Part I, Item 3 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. There can be no assurance the Company will not be adversely affected by this proceeding or other proceedings to which the Company might be a party in the future.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Foreign Currency. The Company exports products to diverse geographic locations. Most of the Company's international revenues through subsidiaries are denominated in foreign currencies. In total, the strengthening of certain foreign currencies improved 2003 revenue by approximately $4.1 million, or 5 percentage points. To date, foreign currency fluctuations have not had a material effect on the Company's operating results or financial condition. The Company's exposure is mitigated, in part, by the fact that it incurs certain operating costs in the same foreign currencies in which revenues are denominated.

Interest Rate. The Company is exposed to fluctuations in interest rates. A significant portion of the Company's cash is invested in short-term interest-bearing securities. Assuming an average investment level in short-term interest-bearing securities of $20.9 million (which approximates the average amount invested in these securities during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003) each 1-percentage point decrease in the applicable interest rate would result in a $209 thousand decrease in annual investment income. To date, interest rate fluctuations have not had a material impact on the Company's operating results or financial condition.

In order to reduce exposure to movements in interest rates, in January 2003 the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement to convert its variable rate mortgage loan to a fixed rate. The agreement involves the exchange of fixed and floating interest rate payments over the 10-year life of the loan. The variable interest rate on the mortgage loan is the 30-day LIBOR rate plus 2.25%. The interest rate swap has fixed the effective interest rate that the Company will pay at 6.82%. (The 6.82% interest rate is based on the assumption that the 30-day LIBOR plus 2.25% is 3.5% or higher, due to the interest rate minimum which applies to the mortgage) The impact of the fluctuations in interest rates on the interest rate swap agreement will be naturally offset by the opposite impact on the related mortgage debt. The Company accounts for this interest rate swap in accordance with SFAS No. 133.

For the year ended September 30, 2003, the fair value of the swap agreement, which represents the cash the Company would pay to settle the agreement, was $596 thousand. The current portion of $64 thousand is recorded on the balance sheet in the caption Accrued liabilities and the long-term portion of $532 thousand is in the caption Other long-term liabilities. The Company records the payments or receipts on the agreement as adjustments to interest expense. The Company recognized $332 thousand in interest expense related to the swap for the year ended September 30, 2003.

Quarterly Financial Information (unaudited)
( In thousands, except per share data)

This information has been derived from unaudited quarterly consolidated financial statements that, in the opinion of management include all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of such information. The operating results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for any future period.

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
MapInfo Corporation:

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a) present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of MapInfo Corporation and its subsidiaries at September 30, 2003 and 2002, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2003, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a) presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in acc ordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

As discussed in Note 5 to the financial statements, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets", during fiscal 2002.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP 

Albany, New York
October 24, 2003, except for Note 16
 as to which the date is December 3, 2003.

MapInfo Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Income Statements

See accompanying notes.

MapInfo Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets

See accompanying notes.

MapInfo Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows