Back to GetFilings.com




UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

[X] Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 [No Fee Required]

For the year ended December 31, 1998 or

[ ] Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [No Fee Required] For the transition period from
to Commission File Number 0-26338
- ------------------- ------------------

DEAN WITTER SPECTRUM TECHNICAL L.P.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its Limited Partnership Agreement)

DELAWARE 13-3782231
------------------------------ ----------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)

c/o Demeter Management Corporation
Two World Trade Center, - 62nd Flr., New York, N.Y. 10048
- --------------------------------------------------- -----------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code (212) 392-5454

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Name of each exchange
Title of each class on which registered

None None
------------------------------- -------------------------------

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Units of Limited Partnership Interest
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Title of Class)


Indicate by check-mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No ____

Indicate by check-mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to
Item 405 of Regulation S-K (section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained
herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III
of this Form 10-K or any amendment of this Form 10-K. [X]

State the aggregate market value of the Units of Limited Partnership Interest
held by non-affiliates of the registrant. The aggregate market value shall be
computed by reference to the price at which units were sold as of a specified
date within 60 days prior to the date of filing: $239,911,839.82 at January 31,
1999.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
(See Page 1)






DEAN WITTER SPECTRUM TECHNICAL L.P.
INDEX TO ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
DECEMBER 31, 1998

Page No.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

Part I.

Item 1. Business. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-5

Item 2. Properties. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

Item 3. Legal Proceedings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-7

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 6

Part II.

Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Partnership
Units and Related Security Holder Matters . . . . . 7-8

Item 6. Selected Financial Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations. . . . . . . . 10-18

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18-33

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. . . . . 32

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on
Accounting and Financial Disclosure. . . . . . . . . 32
Part III.

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant . 33-38

Item 11. Executive Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
and Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions . . 38

Part IV.

Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and
Reports on Form 8-K . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39






DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
-----------------------------------


Portions of the following documents are incorporated by reference as follows:



Documents Incorporated Part of Form l0-K
---------------------- -----------------


Partnership's Prospectus dated
January 21, 1999 I

Annual Report to Dean Witter
Spectrum Series Limited Partners
for the year ended December 31, 1998 II, III and IV















- 1 -

PART I

Item 1. BUSINESS

(a) General Development of Business. Dean Witter Spectrum Technical
L.P. (the "Partnership") is a Delaware limited partnership organized to engage
in the speculative trading of futures, forward and options contracts on physical
commodities and other commodities interests, including foreign currencies,
financial instruments, precious and industrial metals, energy products, and
agriculturals (collectively, "futures interests"). The Partnership is one of the
Dean Witter Spectrum Series of Funds, comprised of the Partnership, Dean Witter
Spectrum Global Balanced L.P., Dean Witter Spectrum Strategic L.P. and Dean
Witter Spectrum Select L.P. Dean Witter Spectrum Select L.P., (formerly "Dean
Witter Select Futures Fund L.P."), became one of the Dean Witter Spectrum Series
of Funds May 31, 1998. The general partner is Demeter Management Corporation
("Demeter"). The non-clearing commodity broker is Dean Witter Reynolds Inc.
("DWR"), and an unaffiliated clearing commodity broker, Carr Futures Inc.
("Carr"), provides clearing and execution services. Both Demeter and DWR are
wholly-owned subsidiaries of Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co. ("MSDW"). The
trading advisors to the Partnership are Campbell & Company, Inc., Chesapeake
Capital Corporation, and John W. Henry & Company, Inc., (collectively, the
"Trading Advisors").




- 2 -

The Partnership registered 5,000,000 additional Units of Limited
Partnership Interest ("Units") pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form S-1
(SEC File number 333-478311), which became effective May 11, 1998.

Units are offered at monthly closings at a price equal to 100% of the
Net Asset Value per Unit as of the close of business on the last day of each
month. The managing underwriter for the Spectrum Series is DWR.

10,000,000 additional Units were registered pursuant to another
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (SEC File Number 333-68779), which became
effective January 21, 1999.

The Partnership's Net Asset Value per Unit as of December 31, 1998 was
$16.12, representing an increase of 10.18 percent from the Net Asset Value per
Unit of $14.63 on December 31, 1997. For a more detailed description of the
Partnership's business see subparagraph (c).

(b) Financial Information about Industry Segments. For financial
information reporting purposes the Partnership is deemed to engage in one
industry segment, the speculative trading of futures interests. The relevant
financial information is presented in Items 6 and 8.

(c) Narrative Description of Business. The Partnership is in the
business of speculative trading of futures interests, pursuant to trading
instructions provided by the Trading Advisors. For a detailed description of the
different facets of the Partnership's business, see




- 3 -

those portions of the Partnership's Prospectus, dated January 21, 1999, (the
"Prospectus") incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K, set forth below.

Facets of Business
------------------

1. Summary 1. "Summary of the Prospectus"
(Pages 1-6 of the
Prospectus).

2. Futures, Options and 2. "The Futures, Options
Forward Markets and Forward Markets"
(Pages 83-87 of the
Prospectus).

3. Partnership's Trading 3. "Investment Programs,
Arrangements and Use of Proceeds and
Policies Trading Policies" (Pages
20-25 of the Prospectus).
"The Trading Advisors"
(Pages 49-79 of the
Prospectus).

4. Management of the 4. "The Trading Advisors -
Partnership The Management Agree-
ments" (Page 49 of the
Prospectus),"The
General Partner"(Pages47-48
of the Prospectus),
"The Commodity Brokers"
(Page 82 of the
Prospectus) and "The
Limited Partnership Agreements"
(Pages 87-91 of the Prospectus).

5. Taxation of the Partner- 5. "Material Federal Income
ship's Limited Partners Tax Considerations" and
"State and Local Income Tax
Aspects" (Pages 96-102 of
the Prospectus).





- 4 -

(d) Financial Information About Foreign and Domestic Operations and
Export Sales.

The Partnership has not engaged in any operations in foreign
countries; however, the Partnership (through the commodity brokers) enters into
forward contract transactions where foreign banks are the contracting party and
trades in futures interests on foreign exchanges.

Item 2. PROPERTIES

The executive and administrative offices are located within the
offices of DWR. The DWR offices utilized by the Partnership are located at Two
World Trade Center, 62nd Floor, New York, NY 10048.

Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On September 6, 10, and 20, 1996, and on March 13, 1997, similar
purported class actions were filed in the Superior Court of the State of
California, County of Los Angeles, on behalf of all purchasers of interests in
limited partnership commodity pools sold by DWR. Named defendants include DWR,
Demeter, Dean Witter Futures & Currency Management Inc.("DWFCM"), MSDW (all such
parties referred to hereafter as the "Dean Witter Parties"), certain other
limited partnership commodity pools of which Demeter is the general partner, and
certain trading advisors to those pools. On June 16, 1997, the plaintiffs in the
above actions filed a consolidated amended complaint, alleging, among other
things, that the defendants committed fraud, deceit, negligent
misrepresentation, various violations of the California Corporation



- 5 -

Code, intentional and negligent breach of fiduciary duty, fraudulent and unfair
business practices, unjust enrichment, and conversion in the sale and operation
of the various limited partnership commodity pools. Similar purported class
actions were also filed on September 18 and 20, 1996, in the Supreme Court of
the State of New York, New York County, and on November 14, 1996 in the Superior
Court of the State of Delaware, New Castle County, against the Dean Witter
Parties and certain trading advisors on behalf of all purchasers of interests in
various limited partnership commodity pools sold by DWR. A consolidated and
amended complaint in the action pending in the Supreme Court of the State of New
York was filed on August 13, 1997, alleging that the defendants committed fraud,
breach of fiduciary duty, and negligent misrepresentation in the sale and
operation of the various limited partnership commodity pools. On December 16,
1997, upon motion of the plaintiffs, the action pending in the Superior Court of
the State of Delaware was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice. The New York
Supreme Court dismissed the New York action in November 1998, but granted
plaintiffs leave to file an amended complaint, which they did in early December
1998. The defendants have filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint with
prejudice on February 1, 1999. The complaints seek unspecified amounts of
compensatory and punitive damages and other relief. It is possible that
additional similar actions may be filed and that, in the course of these
actions, other parties could be added as



- 6 -

defendants. The Dean Witter Parties believe that they have strong defenses to,
and they will vigorously contest, the actions. Although the ultimate outcome of
legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, it is the opinion of
management of the Dean Witter Parties that the resolution of the actions will
not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or the results of
operations of any of the Dean Witter Parties.

Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.














- 7 -

PART II

Item 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S PARTNERSHIP UNITS AND RELATED SECURITY
HOLDER MATTERS

There is no established public trading market for Units of the
Partnership. The number of holders of Units at December 31, 1998 was
approximately 22,257. No distributions have been made by the Partnership since
it commenced trading operations on November 2, 1994. Demeter has sole discretion
to decide what distributions, if any, shall be made to investors in the
Partnership. No determination has yet been made as to future distributions.

The Partnership registered 5,000,000 additional Units pursuant to a
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (SEC File Number 333-478311), which became
effective May 11, 1998.

Units are being sold at monthly closings as of the last day of each
month at a price equal to 100% of the Net Asset Value of a Unit as of the date
of such monthly closing.

Through December 31, 1998, 18,612,023.384 Units have been sold, leaving
4,387,976.616 Units unsold as of December 31, 1998. The aggregate price of the
Units sold through December 31, 1998 is $239,580,695.

Since no expenses are chargeable against proceeds, 100% of the proceeds
of the offering have been applied to the working capital of the Partnership for
use in accordance with the "Investment Programs, Use of



- 8 -

Proceeds and Trading Policies" section of the Prospectus.

10,000,000 additional Units were registered pursuant to another
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (SEC File Number 33-68779), which became
effective January 21, 1999.


































- 9 -




Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (in dollars)







For the Period from
November 2, 1994
(commencement
For the Years Ended December 31, of operations) to
1998 1997 1996 1995 December 31, 1994
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Total Revenues
(including interest) 49,940,173 29,527,587 28,025,066 9,239,533 5,935


Net Income (Loss) 22,801,370 11,707,084 15,901,317 4,261,868 (232,179)


Net Income (Loss)
Per Unit (Limited
& General Partners) 1.49 1.02 2.11 1.72 (.22)


Total Assets 258,673,911 184,769,817 114,822,056 60,075,842 15,084,678


Total Limited
Partners' Capital 252,455,045 180,099,271 111,852,280 58,726,495 14,771,789


Net Asset Value Per
Unit of Limited
Partnership Interest 16.12 14.63 13.61 11.50 9.78




























- 10 -

Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Liquidity - Assets of the Partnership are deposited with DWR as
non-clearing broker and Carr as clearing broker in separate futures interest
trading accounts. Such assets are held in either non-interest bearing bank
accounts or in securities approved by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
("CFTC") for investment of customer funds. The Partnership's assets held by DWR
and Carr may be used as margin solely for the Partnership's trading. Since the
Partnership's sole purpose is to trade in futures interests, it is expected that
the Partnership will continue to own such liquid assets for margin purposes.

The Partnership's investment in futures interests may, from time to
time, be illiquid. Most United States futures exchanges limit fluctuations in
certain futures interest prices during a single day by regulations referred to
as "daily price fluctuations limits" or "daily limits". Pursuant to such
regulations, during a single trading day no trades may be executed at prices
beyond the daily limit. If the price for a particular future interest has
increased or decreased by an amount equal to the daily limit, positions in such
futures interest can neither be taken nor liquidated unless traders are willing
to effect trades at or







- 11 -

within the limit. Futures interests prices have occasionally moved the daily
limit for several consecutive days with little or no trading. Such market
conditions could prevent the Partnership from promptly liquidating its futures
interests and result in restrictions on redemptions.

There is no limitation on daily price moves in trading forward
contracts on foreign currency. The markets for some world currencies have low
trading volume and are illiquid, which may prevent the Partnership from trading
in potentially profitable markets or from promptly liquidating unfavorable
positions, subjecting it to substantial losses. Either of these market
conditions could result in restrictions on redemptions.

Capital Resources. The Partnership does not have, nor does it expect to
have, any capital assets. Future redemptions, exchanges and sales of additional
Units will affect the amount of funds available for investment in futures
interests in subsequent periods. Since they are at the discretion of Limited
Partners, it is not possible to estimate the amount and therefore, the impact of
future redemptions, exchanges or sales of additional Units.

Results of Operations. As of December 31, 1998, the Partnership's
total capital was $255,101,434, an increase of $73,150,927 from the
Partnership's total capital of $181,950,507 at December 31, 1997. For





- 12 -

the year ended December 31, 1998, the Partnership generated net income of
$22,801,370, total subscriptions aggregated $70,451,681 and total redemptions
aggregated $20,102,124.

For the year ended December 31, 1998, the Partnership's total trading
revenues, including interest income, were $49,940,173. The Partnership's total
expenses for the year were $27,138,803, resulting in net income of $22,801,370.
The value of an individual unit in the Partnership increased from $14.63 at
December 31, 1997 to $16.12 at December 31, 1998.

As of December 31, 1997, the Partnership's total capital was
$181,950,507, an increase of $68,964,878 from the Partnership's total capital of
$112,985,629, at December 31, 1996. For the year ended December 31, 1997, the
Partnership generated net income of $11,707,084, total subscriptions aggregated
$69,682,458 and total redemptions aggregated $12,424,664.

For the year ended December 31, 1997, the Partnership's total trading
revenues including interest income were $29,527,587. The Partnership's total
expenses for the year were $17,820,503, resulting in net income of $11,707,084.
The value of an individual unit in the Partnership increased from $13.61 at
December 31, 1996 to $14.63 at December 31, 1997.

As of December 31, 1996, the Partnership's total capital was
$112,985,629, an increase of $53,659,250 from the Partnership's total



- 13 -

capital of $59,326,379 at December 31, 1995. For the year ended December 31,
1996, the Partnership generated net income of $15,901,317, total subscriptions
aggregated $44,442,998 and redemptions aggregated $6,685,065.

For the year ended December 31, 1996, the Partnership's total trading
revenues including interest income were $28,025,066. The Partnership's total
expenses for the year were $12,123,749, resulting in net income of $15,901,317.
The value of an individual unit in the Partnership increased from $11.50 at
December 31, 1995 to $13.61 at December 31, 1996.

The Partnership's overall performance record represents varied results
of trading in different futures interests markets. For a further description of
1998 trading results, refer to the letter to the Limited Partners in the
accompanying Annual Report to Limited Partners for the year ended December 31,
1998, incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K. The Partnership's gains and
losses are allocated among its partners for income tax purposes.

Credit Risk. In entering into futures and forward contracts there is a
credit risk to the Partnership that the counterparty on the contract will not be
able to meet its obligations to the Partnership. The ultimate counterparty of
the Partnership for futures contracts traded in the United States and most
foreign exchanges on which the Partnership trades is the clearinghouse
associated with such exchange.




- 14 -

In general, a clearinghouse is backed by the membership of the exchange and will
act in the event of non-performance by one of its members or one of its member's
customers, and, as such, should significantly reduce this credit risk. For
example, a clearinghouse may cover a default by (i) drawing upon a defaulting
member's mandatory contributions and/or non-defaulting members' contributions to
a clearinghouse guarantee fund, established lines or letters of credit with
banks, and/or the clearinghouse's surplus capital and other available assets of
the exchange and clearinghouse, or (ii) assessing its members.

In cases where the Partnership trades on a foreign exchange where the
clearinghouse is not funded or guaranteed by the membership or where the
exchange is a "principals' market" in which performance is the responsibility of
the exchange member and not the exchange or a clearinghouse, or when the
Partnership enters into off-exchange contracts with a counterparty, the sole
recourse of the Partnership will be the clearinghouse, the exchange member or
the off-exchange contract counterparty, as the case may be. There can be no
assurance that a clearinghouse, exchange or other exchange member will meet its
obligations to the Partnership, and the Partnership is not indemnified against a
default by such parties from Demeter, MSDW or DWR.

Further, the law is unclear as to whether a commodity broker has any
obligation to protect its customers from loss in the event of an exchange,
clearinghouse or other exchange member default on trades



- 15 -

effected for the broker's customers. Any such obligation on the part of the
broker appears even less clear where the default occurs in a non-US
jurisdiction.

Demeter deals with the credit risks of all partnerships for which it
serves as general partner in several ways. First, it monitors the Partnership's
credit exposure to each exchange on a daily basis, calculating not only the
amount of margin required for it but also the amount of its unrealized gains at
each exchange, if any. The commodity brokers inform the Partnership, as with all
their customers, of its net margin requirements for all its existing open
positions, but do not break that net figure down, exchange by exchange. Demeter,
however, has installed a system which permits it to monitor the Partnership's
potential margin liability, exchange by exchange. Demeter is then able to
monitor the Partnership's potential net credit exposure to each exchange by
adding the unrealized trading gains on that exchange, if any, to the
Partnership's margin liability thereon.

Second, the Partnership's trading policies limit the amount of its net
assets that can be committed at any given time to futures contracts and require,
in addition, a certain minimum amount of diversification in the Partnership's
trading, usually over several different products. One of the aims of such
trading policies has been to reduce the credit exposure of the Partnership to a
single exchange and, historically, such Partnership's exposure has typically
amounted to only a small percentage



- 16 -

of its total net assets. On those relatively few occasions where the
Partnership's credit exposure may climb above that level, Demeter deals with the
situation on a case by case basis, carefully weighing whether the increased
level of credit exposure remains appropriate.
Third, Demeter has secured, with respect to Carr acting as the clearing
broker for the Partnership, a guarantee by Credit Agricole Indosuez, Carr's
parent, of the payment of the "net liquidating value" of the transactions
(futures and forward contracts) in the Partnership's account.
With respect to forward contract trading, the Partnership trades with
only those counterparties which Demeter, together with DWR, have determined to
be creditworthy. At the date of this filing, the Partnership deals only with
Carr as its counterparty on forward contracts. The guarantee by Carr's parent,
discussed above, covers these forward contracts.
See "Financial Instruments" under Notes to Financial Statements in the
Partnership's Annual Report to Limited Partners for the year ended December 31,
1998, incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K.



- 17 -

Year 2000 Problem. Commodity pools, like financial and business
organizations and individuals around the world, depend on the smooth functioning
of computer systems. Many computer systems in use today cannot recognize the
computer code for the year 2000, but revert to 1900 or some other date. This is
commonly known as the "Year 2000 Problem." The Partnership could be adversely
affected if computer systems used by it or any third party with whom it has a
material relationship do not properly process and calculate date-related
information and data concerning dates on or after January 1, 2000. Such a
failure could adversely affect the handling or determination of futures trades
and prices and other services.

MSDW began its planning for the Year 2000 Problem in 1995, and
currently has several hundred employees working on the matter. It has developed
its own Year 2000 compliance plan to deal with the problem and had the plan
approved by the company's executive management, Board of Directors and
Information Technology Department. Demeter is coordinating with MSDW to address
the Year 2000 Problem with respect to Demeter's computer systems that affect the
Partnership. This includes hardware and software upgrades, systems consulting
and computer maintenance.

Beyond the challenge facing internal computer systems, the systems
failure of any of the third parties with whom the Partnership has a material
relationship - the futures exchanges and clearing organizations through which it
trades, Carr, or the Trading Advisors - could result in



- 18 -

a material financial risk to the Partnership. All U.S. futures exchanges are
subject to monitoring by the CFTC of their Year 2000 preparedness and the major
foreign futures exchanges are also expected to be subject to market-wide testing
of their Year 2000 compliance during 1999. Demeter intends to monitor the
progress of Carr and the Trading Advisors throughout 1999 in their Year 2000
compliance and, where applicable, to test its external interface with Carr and
the Trading Advisors.

A worst case scenario would be one in which trading of contracts on
behalf of the Partnership becomes impossible as a result of the Year 2000
Problem encountered by any third parties. A less catastrophic but more likely
scenario would be one in which trading opportunities diminish as a result of
technical problems resulting in illiquidity and fewer opportunities to make
profitable trades. MSDW has begun developing various "contingency plans" in the
event that the systems of such third parties fail. Demeter intends to consult
closely with MSDW in implementing those plans. Despite the best efforts of both
Demeter and MSDW, however, it is possible that these steps will not be
sufficient to avoid any adverse impact to the Partnership.

Risks Associated With the Euro. On January 1, 1999, eleven countries in
the European Union established fixed conversion rates on their existing
sovereign currencies and converted to a common single currency (the "euro").
During a three-year transition period, the - 19 - sovereign currencies will
continue to exist but only as a fixed denomination of the euro. Conversion to
the euro prevents the Trading Advisors from trading in certain currencies and
thereby limits their ability to take advantage of potential market opportunities
that might otherwise have existed had separate currencies been available to
trade. This could adversely affect the performance results of the Partnership.

Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Introduction

The Partnership is a commodity pool engaged primarily in the speculative trading
of futures interests. The market sensitive instruments held by the Partnership
are acquired solely for speculative trading purposes and, as a result, all or
substantially all of the Partnership's assets are subject to the risk of trading
loss. Unlike an operating company, the risk of market sensitive instruments is
integral, not incidental, to the Partnership's primary business activities.

The futures interests traded by the Partnership involve varying degrees of
related market risk. Such market risk is often dependent upon changes in the
level or volatility of interest rates, exchange rates, and/or market values of
financial instruments and commodities. Fluctuations in related market risk based
upon the aforementioned factors result in frequent changes in the fair value of
the



- 20 -

Partnership's open positions, and, consequently, in its earnings and cash flow.

The Partnership's total market risk is influenced by a wide variety of factors,
including the diversification effects among the Partnership's existing open
positions, the volatility present within the market(s), and the liquidity of the
market(s). At varying times, each of these factors may act to exacerbate or mute
the market risk associated with the Partnership.

The Partnership's past performance is not necessarily indicative of its future
results. Any attempt at quantifying the Partnership's market risk must be
qualified by the inherent uncertainty of its speculative trading, which may
cause future losses and volatility (i.e. "risk of ruin") far in excess of the
Partnership's experience to date and/or any reasonable expectation premised upon
historical changes in the fair value of its market sensitive instruments.

Quantifying the Partnership's Trading Value at Risk

The following quantitative disclosures regarding the Partnership's market risk
exposures contain "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the safe
harbor from civil liability provided for such statements by the



- 21 -

Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (set forth in Section 27A of
the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934). All quantitative disclosures in this section are deemed to be
forward-looking statements for purposes of the safe harbor, except for
statements of historical fact.

The Partnership accounts for open positions on the basis of mark-to-market
accounting principles. As such, any loss in the fair value of the Partnership's
open positions is directly reflected in the Partnership's earnings, whether
realized or unrealized, and the Partnership's cash flow, as profits and losses
on open positions of exchange-traded futures interests are settled daily through
variation margin.

The Partnership's risk exposure in the various market sectors traded by the
Trading Advisors is estimated below in terms of Value at Risk ("VaR"). The VaR
model employed by the Partnership incorporates numerous variables that could
impact the fair value of the Partnership's trading portfolio. The Partnership
estimates VaR using a model based on historical simulation with a confidence
level of 99%. Historical simulation involves constructing a distribution of
hypothetical daily changes in trading portfolio value. The VaR model generally
takes into account linear exposures to price and interest rate risk. Market
risks that are incorporated in the VaR model include equity and commodity



- 22 -

prices, interest rates, foreign exchange rates, as well as correlation that
exists among these variables. The hypothetical changes in portfolio value are
based on daily observed percentage changes in key market indices or other market
factors ("market risk factors") to which the portfolio is sensitive. In the case
of the Partnership's VaR, the historical observation period is approximately
four years. The Partnership's one-day 99% VaR corresponds to the negative change
in portfolio value that, based on observed market risk factor moves, would have
been exceeded once in 100 trading days.

VaR models such as the Partnership's are continually evolving as trading
portfolios become more diverse and modeling techniques and systems capabilities
improve. It must also be noted that the VaR model is used to quantify market
risk for historic reporting purposes only and is not utilized by either Demeter
or the Trading Advisors in their daily risk management activities.

The Partnership's Value at Risk in Different Market Sectors

The following table indicates the VaR associated with the Partnership's open
positions, as a percentage of total net assets, by market category as of
December 31, 1998. As of December 31, 1998, the Partnership's total
capitalization was approximately $255 million.





- 23 -

Primary Market December 31, 1998
Risk Category Value at Risk
-------------- ------------------

Interest Rate (1.25)%
Currency (.68)
Equity (.43)
Commodity (.60)
Aggregate Value at Risk (1.60)%

Aggregate value at risk represents the aggregate VaR of the Partnership's open
positions and not the sum of the VaR of the individual categories listed above.
Aggregate VaR will be lower as it takes into account correlation among different
positions and categories.

The table above represents the VaR of the Partnership's open positions at
December 31, 1998 only and is not necessarily representative of either the
historic or future risk of an investment in the Partnership. As the
Partnership's sole business is the speculative trading of primarily futures
interests, the composition of its portfolio of open positions can change
significantly over any given time period or even within a single trading day.
Such changes in open positions could materially impact market risk as measured
by VaR either positively or negatively.




- 24 -

The table below supplements the year end VaR by presenting the Partnership's
high, low and average VaR, as a percentage of total net assets, for the four
quarterly reporting periods from January 1, 1998 through December 31, 1998.

Primary Market Risk Category High Low Average
- ---------------------------- ---- --- -------

Interest Rate (2.08)% (.89)% (1.56)%
Currency (1.92) (.68) (1.51)
Equity (.61) (.43) (.51)
Commodity (.69) (.46) (.57)

Aggregate Value at Risk (3.02)% (1.60)% (2.43)%

Limitations on Value at Risk as an Assessment of Market Risk

The face value of the market sector instruments held by the Partnership is
typically many times the applicable margin requirements, as such margin
requirements generally range between 2% and 15% of contract face value.
Additionally, due to the use of leverage, the face value of the market sector
instruments held by the Partnership is typically many times the total
capitalization of the Partnership. The financial magnitude of the Partnership's
open positions thus creates a "risk of ruin" not typically found in other
investment vehicles. Due to the relative size of the positions held, certain
market conditions may cause the Partnership to incur losses greatly in excess of
VaR within a short



- 25 -

short period of time. The foregoing VaR tables, as well as the past performance
of the Partnership, gives no indication of such "risk of ruin". In addition, VaR
risk measures should be interpreted in light of the methodology's limitations,
which include the following: past changes in market risk factors will not always
yield accurate predictions of the distributions and correlations of future
market movements; changes in portfolio value in response to market movements may
differ from the responses implicit in a VaR model; published VaR results reflect
past trading positions while future risk depends on future positions; VaR using
a one-day time horizon does not fully capture the market risk of positions that
cannot be liquidated or hedged within one day; and the historical market risk
factor data used for VaR estimation may provide only limited insight into losses
that could be incurred under certain unusual market movements.

The foregoing VaR tables present the results of the Partnership's VaR for each
of the Partnership's market risk exposures and on an aggregate basis at December
31, 1998 and for the end of quarter periods during calendar 1998. Since VaR is
based on historical data, VaR should not be viewed as predictive of the
Partnership's future financial performance or its ability to manage and monitor
risk and there can be no assurance



- 26 -

that the Partnership's actual losses on a particular day will not exceed the VaR
amounts indicated below or that such losses will not occur more than 1 in 100
trading days.

Non-Trading Risk

The Partnership has non-trading market risk on its foreign cash balances not
needed for margin. However, such balances, as well as any market risk they may
represent, are immaterial. The Partnership also maintains a substantial portion
(approximately 88%) of its available assets in cash at DWR. A decline in
short-term interest rates will result in a decline in the Partnership's cash
management income. This cash flow risk is not considered material.

Materiality, as used throughout this section, is based on an assessment of
reasonably possible market movements and the potential losses caused by such
movements, taking into account the leverage, optionality and multiplier features
of the Partnership's market sensitive instruments.

Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Primary Trading Risk Exposures

The following qualitative disclosures regarding the Partnership's market risk
exposures - except for (i) those disclosures that are statements of historical
fact and (ii) the descriptions of how the Partnership manages its primary market
risk exposures - constitute forward-looking



- 27 -

statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section
21E of the Securities Exchange Act. The Partnership's primary market risk
exposures as well as the strategies used and to be used by Demeter and the
Trading Advisors for managing such exposures are subject to numerous
uncertainties, contingencies and risks, any one of which could cause the actual
results of the Partnership's risk controls to differ materially from the
objectives of such strategies. Government interventions, defaults and
expropriations, illiquid markets, the emergence of dominant fundamental factors,
political upheavals, changes in historical price relationships, an influx of new
market participants, increased regulation and many other factors could result in
material losses as well as in material changes to the risk exposures and the
risk management strategies of the Partnership. Investors must be prepared to
lose all or substantially all of their investment in the Partnership.

The following were the primary trading risk exposures of the
Partnership as of December 31, 1998, by market sector. It may be anticipated
however, that these market exposures will vary materially over time.

INTEREST RATE. Interest rate risk is the principal market exposure of
the Partnership. Interest rate movements directly affect the price of the
sovereign bond futures positions held by the Partnership and indirectly the
value of its stock index and currency



- 28 -

indirectly the value of its stock index and currency positions. Interest rate
movements in one country as well as relative interest rate movements between
countries materially impact the Partnership's profitability. The Partnership's
primary interest rate exposure is to interest rate fluctuations in the United
States and the other G-7 countries. However, the Partnership also takes futures
positions in the government debt of smaller nations - e.g. Australia. Demeter
anticipates that G-7 interest rates will remain the primary market exposure of
the Partnership for the foreseeable future. The changes in interest rates which
have the most effect on the Partnership are changes in long-term, as opposed to
short-term, rates. Most of the speculative futures positions held by the
Partnership are in medium-to-long term instruments. Consequently, even a
material change in short-term rates would have little effect on the Partnership
were the medium-to-long term rates to remain steady.

CURRENCY. The Partnership's currency exposure is to exchange rate
fluctuations, primarily fluctuations which disrupt the historical pricing
relationships between different currencies and currency pairs. These
fluctuations are influenced by interest rate changes as well as political and
general economic conditions. The Partnership trades in a large number of
currencies, including cross-rates - i.e., positions between two currencies other
than the U.S. dollar. However, the


- 29 -

Partnership's major exposures have typically been in the dollar/yen, dollar/mark
and dollar/pound positions. Demeter does not anticipate that the risk profile of
the Partnership's currency sector will change significantly in the future,
although it is difficult at this point to predict the effect of the introduction
of the Euro on the Trading Advisors' currency trading strategies.

EQUITY. The Partnership's primary equity exposure is to equity price
risk in the G-7 countries. The stock index futures traded by the Partnership are
by law limited to futures on broadly based indices. As of December 31, 1998, the
Partnership's primary exposures were in the ASE (Australia), S&P 500, Financial
Times (England), Nikkei (Japan) and DAX (Germany) stock indices. Demeter
anticipates little, if any, trading in non-G-7 stock indices. The Partnership is
primarily exposed to the risk of adverse price trends or static markets in the
major U.S., European and Japanese indices. (Static markets would not cause major
market changes but would make it difficult for the Partnership to avoid being
"whipsawed" into numerous small losses).

COMMODITY.

Metals. The Partnership's primary metals market exposure is to
fluctuations in the price of gold and silver. Although some of the Trading
Advisors will from time to time trade base metals such as aluminum, copper,
nickel, lead, tin and zinc, the principal market



- 30 -

exposures of the Partnership have consistently been in the precious metals, gold
and silver. The Trading Advisors' gold trading has been increasingly limited due
to the long-lasting and mainly non-volatile decline in the price of gold over
the last 10-15 years. However, silver prices have remained volatile over this
period, and the Trading Advisors have from time to time taken substantial
positions as they have perceived market opportunities to develop. Demeter
anticipates that gold and silver will remain the primary metals market exposure
for the Partnership.

Soft Commodities. One of the Partnership's primary commodities exposure
is to fluctuations in the price of soft commodities, which are often directly
affected by severe or unexpected weather conditions. Soybeans, grains, and
coffee accounted for the substantial bulk of the Partnership's commodities
exposure at December 31, 1998. The Partnership has had market exposure to live
cattle and lean hogs. However, Demeter anticipates that the Trading Advisors
will maintain an emphasis on soybeans, grains, and coffee, in which the
Partnership has historically taken it's largest positions.

Energy. The Partnership's primary energy market exposure is to gas and
oil price movements, often resulting from political developments in the Middle
East. Although the Trading Advisors trade natural gas to a limited extent, oil
is by far the dominant energy market exposure of



- 31 -

the Partnership. Oil prices are currently depressed, but they can be volatile
and substantial profits and losses have been and are expected to continue to be
experienced in this market.

Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Non-Trading Risk Exposure

The following was the only non-trading risk exposure of the Partnership at
December 31, 1998:

Foreign Currency Balances. The Partnership's primary foreign currency balances
are in Japanese yen, German marks, British pounds, French francs and euros. The
Partnership controls the non-trading risk of these balances by regularly
converting these balances back into U.S. dollars at varying intervals, depending
upon such factors as size, volatility, etc.

Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Means of Managing Risk Exposure

The means by which the Partnership and the Trading Advisors, severally, attempt
to manage the risk of the Partnership's open positions are essentially the same
in all market categories traded. Demeter attempts to manage the Partnership's
market exposure by (i) diversifying the Partnership's assets among different
Trading Advisors, each of whose strategies focus on different market sectors and
trading approaches, and (ii), monitoring the performance of the Trading Advisors
on a daily



- 32 -

basis. In addition, the Trading Advisors establish diversification guidelines,
often set in terms of the maximum margin to be committed to positions in any one
market sector or market sensitive instrument. One should be aware that certain
Trading Advisors treat their risk control policies as strict rules, whereas
others treat such policies as general guidelines.

Demeter monitors and controls the risk of the Partnership's non-trading
instrument, cash, which is the only Partnership investment directed by Demeter,
rather than the Trading Advisors.

Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The information required by this Item appears in the Annual Report to
Limited Partners for the year ended December 31, 1998 and is incorporated by
reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.











- 33 -


PART III

Item 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

There are no directors or executive officers of the Partnership. The Partnership
is managed by Demeter.

Directors and Officers of the General Partner

The directors and executive officers of Demeter are as follows:

Mark J. Hawley, age 55, is Chairman of the Board and a Director of
Demeter. Mr. Hawley is also Chairman of the Board and a Director of DWFCM. Mr.
Hawley previously served as President of Demeter throughout 1998. Mr. Hawley
joined DWR in February 1989 as Senior Vice President and is currently the
Executive Vice President and Director of DWR's Product Management for Individual
Asset Management. In this capacity, Mr. Hawley is responsible for directing the
activities of the firm's Managed Futures, Insurance, and Unit Investment Trust
Business. From 1978 to 1989, Mr. Hawley was a member of the senior management
team at Heinold Asset Management, Inc., a CPO, and was responsible for a variety
of projects in public futures funds. From 1972 to 1978, Mr. Hawley was a Vice
President in charge of institutional block trading for the Mid-West at Kuhn Loeb
& Company.

Joseph G. Siniscalchi, age 53, is a Director of Demeter. Mr.
Siniscalchi joined DWR in July 1984 as a First Vice President, Director of
General Accounting and served as a Senior Vice President and



- 34 -

Controller for DWR's Securities Division through 1997. He is currently Executive
Vice President and Director of the Operations Division of DWR. From February
1980 to July 1984, Mr. Siniscalchi was Director of Internal Audit at Lehman
Brothers Kuhn Loeb, Inc.

Edward C. Oelsner, III, age 56, is a Director of Demeter. Mr. Oelsner
is currently an Executive Vice President and head of the Product Development
Group at Dean Witter InterCapital Inc., an affiliate of DWR. Mr. Oelsner joined
DWR in 1981 as a Managing Director in DWR's Investment Banking Department
specializing in coverage of regulated industries and, subsequently, served as
head of the DWR Retail Products Group. Prior to joining DWR, Mr. Oelsner held
positions at The First Boston Corporation as a member of the Research and
Investment Banking Departments from 1967 to 1981. Mr. Oelsner received his
M.B.A. in Finance from the Columbia University Graduate School of Business in
1966 and an A.B. in Politics from Princeton University in 1964.

Robert E. Murray, age 38, is President and a Director of Demeter. Mr.
Murray is also President and a Director of DWFCM. Effective as of the close of
business December 31, 1998, Mr. Murray replaced Mr. Hawley as President of
Demeter. Mr. Murray is also a Senior Vice President of DWR's Managed Futures
Department and is the Senior Administrative Officer of DWFCM. Mr. Murray began
his career at DWR in 1984 and is




- 35 -

currently the Director of the Managed Futures Department. In this capacity, Mr.
Murray is responsible for overseeing all aspects of the firm's Managed Futures
Department. Mr. Murray currently serves as a Director of the Managed Funds
Association, an industry association for investment professionals in futures,
hedge funds and other alternative investments. Mr. Murray graduated from Geneseo
State University in May 1983 with a B.A. degree in Finance.

Lewis A. Raibley, III, age 36, is Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and a Director of Demeter. Effective as of the close of business on
December 31, 1998, Mr. Raibley was elected to Demeter's Board of Directors. Mr.
Raibley is currently Senior Vice President and Controller in the Individual
Asset Management Group of MSDW. From July 1997 to May 1998, Mr. Raibley served
as Senior Vice President and Director in the Internal Reporting Department of
MSDW and prior to that, from 1992 to 1997, he served as Senior Vice President
and Director in the Financial Reporting and Policy Division of Dean Witter
Discover & Co. He has been with MSDW and its affiliates since June 1986.

Mitchell M. Merin, age 45, became a Director of Demeter on March 17,
1999. Mr. Merin was appointed the Chief Operating Officer of Asset Management
for MSDW in December 1998 and the President and Chief Executive Officer of
Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Advisors in February 1998. He has been an Executive
Vice President of DWR since 1990, during



- 36 -

which time he has been director of DWR's Taxable Fixed Income and Futures
divisions, managing director in Corporate Finance and corporate treasurer. Mr.
Merin received his Bachelor's degree from Trinity College in Connecticut and his
M.B.A. degree in finance and accounting from the Kellogg Graduate School of
Management of Northwestern University in 1977.

Richard A. Beech, age 47, became a Director of Demeter on March 17,
1999. Mr. Beech has been associated with the futures industry for over 23 years.
He has been at DWR since August 1984 where he is presently Senior Vice President
and head of Branch Futures. Mr. Beech began his career at the Chicago Mercantile
Exchange, where he became the Chief Agricultural Economist doing market
analysis, marketing and compliance. Prior to joining DWR, Mr. Beech also had
worked at two investment banking firms in Operations, Research, Managed Futures
and Sales Management.

Ray Harris, age 42, became a Director of Demeter on March 17, 1999. Mr.
Harris is currently Senior Vice President, Planning and Administration for
Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Asset Management and has worked at DWR or its
affiliates since July 1982, serving in both financial and administrative
capacities. From August 1994 to January 1999, he worked in two separate DWR
affiliates, Discover Financial Services and Novus Financial Corp., culminating
as Senior Vice



- 37 -

President. Mr. Harris received his B.A. degree from Boston College and his
M.B.A. in finance from the University of Chicago.

Richard M. DeMartini, age 46, previously served as the Chairman of the
Board and as a Director of Demeter throughout 1998. Effective as of the close of
business on December 31, 1998, Mr. DeMartini resigned as the Chairman of the
Board and as a Director of Demeter due to changes in his responsibilities within
MSDW.

Lawrence Volpe, age 51, served as a Director to Demeter throughout
1998. Effective as of the close of business on December 31, 1998, Mr. Volpe
resigned as a Director of Demeter.

Patti L. Behnke, age 38, served as Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of Demeter through May 1998. Effective June 1, 1998, Ms. Behnke resigned
as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Demeter in order to take on new
responsibilities as Operations Officer - Controllers Division for MSDW, and was
replaced by Mr. Raibley.

Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The Partnership has no directors and executive officers. As a limited
partnership, the business of the Partnership is managed by Demeter, which is
responsible for the administration of the business affairs of the Partnership
but receives no compensation for such services.




- 38 -

Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

(a) Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners - As of December
31, 1998 there were no persons known to be beneficial owners of more than 5
percent of the Units.

(b) Security Ownership of Management - At December 31, 1998, Demeter
owned 164,158.204 Units of General Partnership Interest representing a 1.04
percent interest in the Partnership.

(c) Changes in Control - None

Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Refer to Note 2 - "Related Party Transactions" of "Notes to Financial
Statements", in the accompanying Annual Report to Limited Partners for the year
ended December 31, 1998, incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K. In its
capacity as the Partnership's retail commodity broker, DWR received commodity
brokerage commissions (paid and accrued by the Partnership) of $15,543,787 for
the year ended December 31, 1998.










- 39 -

PART IV

Item 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a) 1. Listing of Financial Statements

The following financial statements and report of independent auditors,
all appearing in the accompanying Annual Report to Limited Partners for the year
ended December 31, 1998, are incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K:

- Report of Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent auditors, for the
years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996.

- Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 1998 and
1997.

- Statements of Operations, Changes in Partners' Capital, and Cash
Flows for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996.

- Notes to Financial Statements.

With the exception of the aforementioned information and the
information incorporated in Items 7, 8 and 13, the Annual Report to Limited
Partners for the year ended December 31, 1998, is not deemed to be filed with
this report.

2. Listing of Financial Statement Schedules

No financial statement schedules are required to be filed with this
report.

(b) Reports on Form 8-K

No reports on Form 8-K have been filed by the Partnership during the
last quarter of the period covered by this report.

(c) Exhibits

Refer to Exhibit Index on Page E-1.








- 40 -

SIGNATURES
----------

Pursuant to the requirements of Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

DEAN WITTER SPECTRUM TECHNICAL L.P.
(Registrant)

BY: Demeter Management Corporation,
General Partner

March 24, 1999 BY: /s/ Robert E. Murray
-----------------------------------
Robert E. Murray, Director and
President

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Demeter Management Corporation.

BY: /s/ Robert E. Murray March 25, 1999
----------------------------------------
Robert E. Murray, Director and
President

/s/ Mark J. Hawley March 25, 1999
---------------------------------------
Mark J. Hawley, Director
and Chairman of the Board

/s/ Joseph G. Siniscalchi March 25, 1999
----------------------------------------
Joseph G. Siniscalchi, Director

/s/ Edward C. Oelsner III March 25, 1999
---------------------------------------
Edward C. Oelsner III, Director

/s/ Mitchell M. Merin March 25, 1999
---------------------------------------
Mitchell M. Merin, Director

/s/ Richard A. Beech March 25, 1999
---------------------------------------
Richard A. Beech, Director

/s/ Ray Harris March 25, 1999
---------------------------------------
Ray Harris, Director

/s/ Lewis A. Raibley, III March 25, 1999
---------------------------------------
Lewis A. Raibley, III, Director, Chief
Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer




- 41 -


EXHIBIT INDEX

ITEM

3.01 Form of Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of the
Partnership, dated as of May 31, 1998, is incorporated by reference
to Exhibit A of the Partnership's Prospectus, dated January 21, 1999,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule
424(b)(3) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, on January
26, 1999.

3.02 Certificate of Limited Partnership, dated April 18, 1994, is
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.02 of the Partnership's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-80146) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on June 10, 1994.

10.01 Management Agreement, dated as of November 1, 1994, among the
Partnership, Demeter Management Corporation, and Campbell & Company,
Inc. is filed herewith.

10.02 Management Agreement, dated as of November 1, 1994, among the
Partnership, Demeter Management Corporation, and Chesapeake Capital
Corporation is filed herewith.

10.03 Management Agreement, dated as of November 1, 1994, among the
Partnership, Demeter Management Corporation, and John W. Henry & Co.
is filed herewith

10.04 Amended and Restated Customer Agreement, dated as of December 1,
1997, between the Partnership and Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. is filed
herewith.

10.05 Customer Agreement, dated as of December 1, 1997, among the
Partnership, Carr Futures, Inc., and Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. is
filed herewith.

10.06 International Foreign Exchange Master Agreement, dated as of August
1, 1997, between the Partnership and Carr Futures, Inc. is filed
herewith.

10.07 Subscription and Exchange Agreement and Power of Attorney to be
executed by each purchaser of Units is incorporated by reference to
Exhibit B of the Partnership's Prospectus dated January 21, 1999,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule
424(b)(3) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, on January
26, 1999.

10.08 Escrow Agreement, dated September 30, 1994, among the Partnership,
Demeter Management Corporation, Dean Witter Reynolds Inc., and
Chemical Bank is filed herewith.

13.01 Annual Report to Limited Partners for the year ended December 31,
1998 is filed herewith.