SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004
Commission file number: 001-31256
CLARK, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 52-2103926
(State of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
102 SOUTH WYNSTONE PARK DRIVE
NORTH BARRINGTON, ILLINOIS 60010
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
(Registrant's telephone number) (847) 304-5800
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
TITLE OF SECURITIES EXCHANGES ON WHICH REGISTERED
------------------- -----------------------------
COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $.01 PER SHARE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE
JUNIOR PARTICIPATING PREFERRED STOCK,
SERIES A, PURCHASE RIGHTS
PAR VALUE, $.01 PER SHARE
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K.
[ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes [X] No __
The aggregate market value of the voting common stock of the Registrant
held by non-affiliates of the Registrant as of June 30, 2004 (based upon the
closing price of $18.55 per share) was approximately $198.8 million.
As of February 24, 2005, the registrant had outstanding 18,333,732 shares of
common stock.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The definitive proxy statement for the 2005 annual meeting is incorporated
into Part III of this Form 10-K by reference.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
----
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS......................................................................... 2
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS............................................................................. 3
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES........................................................................... 15
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.................................................................... 15
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.................................. 16
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES....................................................... 16
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.............................................................. 18
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS............................................................ 19
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK........................... 33
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.......................................... 34
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.................................................. 34
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES......... .................................................... 34
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.................................................................... 35
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT................................... 36
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION............................................................... 36
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.................................................................. 36
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS....................................... 36
ITEM 14 PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES............................................... 36
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES........................................... 37
SIGNATURES.......................................................................................... 65
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Form 10-K and the documents incorporated by reference in this Form
10-K may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of
the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended. Such statements are identified by words such as "anticipate,"
"believe," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "predict," "project," and similar
expressions. When we make forward-looking statements, we are basing them on our
management's beliefs and assumptions, using information currently available to
us. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and
assumptions, including but not limited to, risks, uncertainties, and assumptions
related to the following:
o changes in tax laws;
o other federal and state laws and regulations;
o general economic conditions;
o competitive factors and pricing pressures;
o our dependence on key producers, consultants and services of key
personnel;
o our dependence on persistency of existing business;
o our ability to achieve our earnings projections;
o risks associated with acquisitions;
o significant intangible assets;
o our dependence on a select group of insurance companies;
o supplemental compensation arrangements with certain insurance
companies; and
o our dependence on information processing systems and risk of errors or
omissions.
If one or more of these or other risks or uncertainties materialize, or
if our underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual results may vary
materially from those anticipated. Any forward-looking statements you read in
this Form 10-K or the documents incorporated herein by reference reflect our
current views with respect to future events and are subject to these and other
risks, uncertainties and assumptions relating to our operations, results of
operations, growth strategy and liquidity. You should specifically consider the
factors identified in this Form 10-K, including under the caption "Risk
Factors," or in the documents incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K, which
could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the
forward-looking statements. In light of the foregoing risks and uncertainties,
you should not unduly rely on such forward looking statements when deciding
whether to buy, sell or hold any of our securities. We disclaim any intent or
obligation to update or alter any of the forward-looking statements whether in
response to new information, unforeseen events, changed circumstances or
otherwise.
2
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
OVERVIEW
Founded in 1967, Clark, Inc. is a national firm dedicated to helping
companies keep their best people through integrated compensation, benefits, and
funding solutions. We design, market, and administer compensation and benefit
programs for companies supplementing and securing employee benefits and provide
executive compensation and related consulting services to U.S. corporations,
banks and healthcare organizations. We have approximately 3,850 clients that use
our customized programs to supplement and secure benefits for their executives,
key employees and other professionals, and to offset the costs of employee
benefit liabilities. Our clients also rely on our consultants to structure their
compensation programs. We were one of the first organizations to offer
business-owned and bank-owned life insurance programs.
A majority of our revenues result from commissions paid by insurance
companies that underwrite the insurance policies used to finance our clients'
benefit programs. As a result of a series of acquisitions, we have expanded our
service offerings to become a value-added provider of a wide range of employee
compensation and benefit consulting services. Our primary sources of revenue
are: (1) commissions paid by insurance companies issuing the policies underlying
our benefit programs, (2) program design and administrative service fees paid by
our clients, (3) executive compensation, benefit, and consulting fees and (4)
legislative liaison and related advisory services.
We are headquartered at 102 S. Wynstone Park Drive, North Barrington,
Illinois 60010 and maintain offices nationwide. Our Internet address is
www.clarkconsulting.com. We post, by means of a hyperlink to the SEC's website,
the following filings as soon as reasonably practicable after they are
electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC: our annual report on Form
10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, our current reports on Form 8-K and
any amendments to those reports filed or furnished to the SEC. All such filings
are on our web site and available free of charge. Information related to our
corporate governance can also be found under "corporate governance" in the
"investors" section of our website.
OUR PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
We provide executive compensation and benefit consulting services as
well as evaluate, design, implement, and administer a diverse array of
compensation and benefit programs for executives, key employees, and other
professionals. Typically, in selling, designing, and implementing executive
compensation and benefit programs, we:
o evaluate a client's existing compensation and benefit programs and the
effectiveness of those programs in meeting that client's
organizational needs;
o design or improve the compensation and benefit programs;
o compare financing alternatives for the programs and present the
financial strengths of each to the client;
o arrange for the placement of the insurance coverage or other
instruments which will finance the underlying programs; and
o provide the enrollment, reporting, and ongoing administrative services
associated with the programs.
Most of our benefit programs are financed by business-owned life
insurance and other financial products. Business-owned life insurance refers to
life insurance policies purchased and owned by a business on the lives of a
select group of employees. The business pays the premiums on, and is the owner
and beneficiary of, such policies. Business-owned life insurance programs are
used primarily to offset a client's cost of providing executive benefits and to
supplement and secure benefits for executives, key employees, and other
professionals. The cash flow characteristics of business-owned life insurance
policies are designed to closely match the long-term cash flow requirements of a
client's employee benefit liabilities. Additionally, the cash value of the
business-owned life insurance policies grow on a tax-deferred basis and the
policies' death benefits are received tax free, providing an attractive return
to the client.
3
We maintain strategic relationships with insurance companies such as
AEGON, AXA/Equitable, Great-West, Mass Mutual, New York Life, ING, Prudential,
Midland National, and West Coast Life, in which both parties are committed to
developing and delivering creative products with high client value. We work
closely with clients to design customized products that meet the specific
organizational needs of the client and with insurance companies to develop
unique policy features and competitive pricing.
Set forth below is a description of our principal benefit plan
solutions, consulting services, financing products, and administrative services.
BENEFIT PLAN SOLUTIONS
Deferred Income Plans. Deferred income plans allow executives to defer
a portion of their current income on a tax-deferred basis. The deferred income
and interest in a properly designed and administered deferred income plan grows
on a tax-deferred basis until distributions are made to the executive, usually
at retirement. Corporations often purchase life insurance to create an asset in
order to offset the costs of the liability created by a deferred income plan.
Deferred income plans can be structured in a variety of ways, including:
traditional deferred income plans, which credit the deferred income amount with
a fixed rate of interest and use fixed yield life insurance products to offset
the costs of the company's liability, or variable deferred income plans, which
credit the deferred income amount with interest based on bond or equity indices
and use variable yield life insurance products to offset the costs of the
corporation's liability. In an effort to provide additional security for
executives, many corporations will create a trust to hold the related insurance
policies.
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans. Supplemental executive
retirement plans are specifically designed to supplement the dollar limitation
on benefits paid from qualified pension plans. The maximum dollar amount of
compensation that can be used to determine the pension benefits payable to an
executive from a qualified plan is currently set at $205 thousand. Accordingly,
non-qualified plans such as supplemental executive retirement plans, which are
not subject to the same stringent rules, have increased in popularity. Many
supplemental executive retirement plans are funded with the same insurance
products and strategies used to fund deferred income plans.
Supplemental Offset Plans. Supplemental offset plans are designed to
supplement an executive's retirement income by restoring benefits previously
limited by legislative changes. Supplemental offset plans are funded with
insurance policies using a technique commonly known as "split dollar." Ownership
rights to an individual policy are shared between the corporation and the
executive. The corporation and the executive share in the insurance policy's
increasing cash value and death benefit. The corporation pays the premiums and
recovers these expenditures from its share of the policy's proceeds. The
executive's interest in such policy is targeted to equal the present value of
the retirement benefits due at the time of such executive's retirement.
Provisions under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 have created uncertainty as to
whether certain split dollar policies may be used with respect to certain
executives. The split-dollar regulations from September 2003 and the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 have significantly reduced the amount of revenue
generated from new split dollar arrangements and may further reduce revenue from
existing split dollar arrangements.
Group Term Carve Out Plans. Currently, a corporation can provide its
employees with a group term life insurance policy death benefit of up to $50
thousand on a tax-free basis. The cost of providing a death benefit in excess of
$50 thousand is taxed to the employee as ordinary income. Group term carve out
plans allow companies to provide portable coverage in a customized program of
amounts greater than $50 thousand that are taxed at lower rates. The purpose of
group term carve out plans is to provide a greater amount of insurance and
post-retirement death benefit to the employee at a competitive overall cost.
Disability Income Plan. Many companies provide group disability income
insurance for their employees. In many cases, these plans have limits that may
not be sufficient to provide reasonable income replacement for executives in the
event of a disability. Group disability insurance plans marketed by our
Executive Benefits Practice and Healthcare Group supplement the group plans
currently in place, and provide additional income for executives in the event of
a disability.
ExecuFLEX Program. Our Healthcare Group provides a total compensation
planning approach to the not-for-profit healthcare market through its
"ExecuFLEX" program. The program includes a base level of benefits, such as
medical, dental, vision, long-term disability, long-term care, and group term
life insurance. In addition, participants are provided an allowance made up of
company contributions and voluntary personal deferrals. The flex allowance is
used to supplement base coverage and to add to the employees' retirement
funding. The ExecuFLEX program is designed to provide maximum flexibility to the
participants at a minimal cost to the organization. The success of ExecuFLEX has
led us to offer the program to companies serviced by our other operating groups
as well as additional market segments within the healthcare industry.
4
CONSULTING SERVICES
As one of the nation's leading compensation consulting firms, Pearl
Meyer & Partners, serves board compensation committees as outside advisors and
assists companies in the creation and implementation of compensation programs
for executives, directors, and employees.
In 2002, we formed our Human Capital Practice. The practice was formed
by combining our existing Rewards and Performance Group and ten former partners
and 74 support staff from Arthur Andersen LLP's ("Andersen") Human Capital
Practice. The Human Capital Practice provided compensation benefits and human
resources consulting services and products to major companies. As of October 1,
2003, we reorganized the executive compensation consulting practices. As part of
this reorganization, some of the operations and employees of Human Capital
Practice were transferred to Pearl Meyer & Partners. The remaining business of
Human Capital Practice, in 2004, consisted of actuarial/retirement plan and
investment advisory services. Effective January 1, 2005, the Human Capital
Practice was merged into the Executive Benefits Practice.
With the acquisition of the Federal Policy Group ("FPG") in 2002, we
were able to expand our services to include a variety of legislative and
regulatory strategic services. FPG develops and implements strategies to pursue
legislative changes; anticipate and respond to proposed legislative initiatives;
help shape administrative regulations and rulings; and raise the visibility of
our clients through testimony before Congress and other avenues. Federal Policy
Group clients include Fortune 500 companies, trade associations, and other
businesses.
Our Healthcare Group and Banking Practice have developed compensation
consulting programs in base salary, incentives, deferred compensation, and other
compensation design plans.
FINANCING PRODUCTS
Business-Owned Life Insurance. Business-owned life insurance is life
insurance purchased and owned by an employer on the lives of a group of its
employees. The insurance is used to help offset the cost of the employee benefit
obligations of the employer. The insurance is typically held by the employer as
a general asset and is not directly linked to the employee benefits.
Business-owned life insurance is marketed to mid-sized and large corporations
and healthcare institutions.
Bank-Owned Life Insurance. When utilized by banks, business-owned life
insurance (as discussed above) is referred to as bank-owned life insurance. We
market these programs to banks with assets in excess of $5 billion, as well as
to regional and community banks that generally have assets of less than $5
billion.
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
As of December 31, 2004, we administered approximately 366 thousand
policies for approximately 2,800 clients. As of the same date, the insurance
policies underlying our employee benefit programs represented a total of
approximately $160 billion of inforce insurance coverage.
The following table presents the number of clients, policies
administered, and inforce coverage as of December 31, 2004:
EXECUTIVE BENEFITS BANKING HEALTHCARE
PRACTICE PRACTICE GROUP TOTAL
------------------ -------- ----------- -----
CLIENTS 400 2,100 300 2,800
POLICIES ADMINISTERED 75,000 274,000 17,000 366,000
INFORCE COVERAGE $44 billion $111 billion $5 billion $160 billion
We also provided consulting services for an additional 1,050 clients in 2004.
We generate fee-based revenues from providing administrative services
to our clients. We approach administrative services with a strategy focused on
servicing our clients' unique requirements and needs through customized,
value-added services and intensive support in order to create brand and client
loyalty and lower sensitivity to price.
5
We offer customized enrollment and administrative services for our
employee benefit programs. In an effort to provide a high level of personalized
services, each client is assigned an account team comprised of specialists who
are responsible for servicing the needs of that client. The administrative
services provided by each of our practices' account specialists include
coordinating and managing the enrollment process; distributing communication
materials; monitoring financial, tax and regulatory changes; providing
accounting reports and periodic benefit statements to participants; performing
annual reviews, and reporting the historical and projected cash flow and
earnings impact of the plans. Actuarial, financial, and insurance experts
support each practice's account specialists.
We build our client base by fostering long-term client relationships.
To this end, the training and focus of each account team centers on our goal of
delivering the highest quality program, implementation, and administrative
services in the industry. This benefits both the client, through top
professional support, and the consultant, who can focus more closely on the
consulting process. To further emphasize long-term client relationships, we
enter into administrative agreements with each client, in most cases for a term
of five to ten years.
OUR BUSINESS SEGMENTS
In 2004, we operated through six operating segments: (1) Executive
Benefits Practice, (2) Banking Practice, (3) Healthcare Group, (4) Pearl Meyer &
Partners, (5) Human Capital Practice, and (6) Federal Policy Group. Through
these six segments, we design, market, and administer compensation and benefit
programs for companies supplementing and securing employee benefits and provide
executive compensation and related consulting and legislative strategic services
to U.S. corporations, banks, and healthcare organizations. Our six operating
segments operate as independent and autonomous business units with a central
corporate staff responsible for finance, strategic planning, human resources,
and company-wide policies. Each segment has its own client base as well as its
own marketing, administration, and management.
We have structured these segments to be independent because each has an
established reputation in their distinct markets and a specific expertise
required to serve these markets. Through these segments, we are able to tailor
compensation and benefit programs and consulting services to the unique needs of
our clients.
Executive Benefits Practice
One of the leaders in its field, our Executive Benefits Practice
("EBP") focuses on the designing, marketing, implementation, administration, and
placement of financing of non-qualified benefit plans for companies of all
sizes, including Fortune 1000 companies and other companies which can benefit
from our products and services. The large corporate marketplace in which EBP
does business requires a significant degree of customization. EBP has struggled
in recent years as a result of a difficult United States legislative
environment, which most directly affects this segment of our business.
Banking Practice
A leader in its industry, Banking Practice ("BP") offers compensation
consulting, executive and director benefits programs, and bank-owned life
insurance to the bank market. BP provides programs to approximately 2,100 banks,
including 43 of the top 50 largest banks in the United States. In addition to
compensation and benefit programs, this group also performs incentive consulting
and works with banks in the design of ownership succession programs.
Healthcare Group
Healthcare Group ("HG") employs a comprehensive benefits approach that
encompasses a variety of insurance products, ranging from traditional life
insurance policies to disability and long-term care coverage. The healthcare
industry's changing environment and complex structure offer many challenges for
the near future. The industry has experienced a great deal of contraction with
changes in our national healthcare regulations and compensation structure.
Pearl Meyer & Partners
Pearl Meyer & Partners ("PM&P"), based in New York City, is focused
predominantly on executive compensation consulting and retention programs for
Fortune 1000 corporations. It is one of the largest executive compensation
consulting organizations in the United States.
6
Human Capital Practice
Human Capital Practice ("HCP") was formed in 2002 by combining our
existing Rewards and Performance Group with former partners and support staff
from the Human Capital Practice of Arthur Andersen LLP. As of October 1, 2003,
we reorganized our executive compensation consulting practices. As part of this
reorganization, some of the operations and employees of HCP were transferred to
Pearl Meyer & Partners. The remaining business of HCP, in 2004, consisted of
actuarial/retirement plan and investment advisory services. Effective January 1,
2005, HCP was merged into the Executive Benefits Practice.
Federal Policy Group
Federal Policy Group ("FPG") focuses on a variety of legislative and
regulatory strategic services. FPG develops and implements strategies to pursue
legislative changes; anticipates and responds to proposed legislative
initiatives; helps shape administrative regulations and rulings; and raises the
visibility of our clients through testimony before Congress and other avenues.
FPG's clients include Fortune 500 companies, trade associations, and other
businesses.
DISTRIBUTION
Each of our segments markets its employee benefit programs and related
administrative and consulting services through company employees as well as
through producers in independently operated sales offices located throughout the
United States. As of December 31, 2004, we were represented by 164 employees and
35 independent producers.
Our independent producers enter into exclusive agency agreements with
us to market programs and services on our behalf. Each agreement defines the
duties of the producer to solicit and sell covered business in an exclusive
geographic territory, the commission splits between the producer and us, and
includes a confidentiality agreement and operating standards. We pay a
substantial portion (usually from 50% to 65%) of the revenue generated by the
independent producers as commissions. All of our independent producers are
responsible for their own operating expenses. Most of our segments generate a
significant portion of their sales revenue through employees and we bear the
administrative expense of the employees in exchange for lower commission
expense. Over the last several years, our sales force has shifted to more
employees from independent producers.
Many of our products have a securities component and must be sold
through a licensed broker/dealer. Clark Securities, Inc. ("CSI") is used by our
producers for distributing these securities-related products. CSI currently
distributes insurance, annuities, and mutual funds for our products. CSI
currently has 287 registered representatives and is licensed to operate in all
50 states and the District of Columbia. By having our own broker/dealer, we are
able to control costs and sensitive customer information more effectively than
if we used an outside broker/dealer.
Our producers are supported by a design and analysis department in each
segment. The primary responsibility of the design and analysis department is to
design customized compensation and benefit programs that will effectively reduce
the costs of a client's employee benefit and compensation liabilities. The
design analyst works with the producer to identify the needs of a prospective
client and investigates the availability and pricing of products that are
compatible with that client's needs. Finally, the analyst develops the financial
projections necessary to evaluate the benefit costs and cost recoveries for the
prospective client, together with an analysis of financing alternatives to
assist the client in making a decision.
We recognize the importance of attracting and retaining qualified,
productive sales professionals. We actively recruit and develop new sales
professionals in order to add to our distribution capacity. Further, our
acquisition strategy focuses on retaining the productive sales professionals of
the entity being acquired.
We are dependent on a few select producers for a portion of our
revenue. Our top three producers collectively accounted for approximately 6.0%
of our total revenue in 2004, 7.4% of our total revenue in 2003, and 6.8% of our
total revenue in 2002. We expect this concentration to decrease as we expand our
producer base and product offerings.
MARKETING SUPPORT
We have established highly qualified marketing departments in each
practice. Each marketing department's primary focus is to support the sales
efforts of their operation through integrated marketing communications
strategies. The marketing departments develop and track leads for consultants
through various channels including advertising, public relations, trade shows,
and direct mail. Additionally, the marketing function provides collateral
materials, business communication, brand support, survey research and
7
distribution. We distribute external newsletters and other program update pieces
to clients and prospects throughout the year and sponsor conferences and
meetings featuring our industry experts. Public relations and corporate
marketing functions coordinate the publication of articles, white papers, and
briefs written by our consultants and ensure that our representatives are
positioned as thought leaders and industry experts in national, local, and
industry trade publications. These efforts have made us a clear leader in the
executive compensation and benefits consulting industry.
Our distribution strategy seeks to leverage our relationships within
our organization and among our business partners. We establish relationships
with carriers and professional service providers that provide opportunities for
cross-utilization of services. We have also developed strategic relationships
with several professional service firms that are used as a referral source for
our consultants. In addition, we have advisory boards of current and former
industry leaders familiar with our products and services who provide
introductions to prospective clients. We believe these relationships assist our
consultants in gaining access to the appropriate personnel of prospective
clients and more effectively establish relationships based on a position of
trust.
INDUSTRY BACKGROUND
Over the past twenty years, as the result of legislative change and
increased competition for executive talent, compensation and benefit programs
have become more sophisticated and complex. In turn, the financing of these
programs has also become increasingly complex. Corporations and banks now
commonly use life insurance to offset the costs of employee benefit liabilities
and several large insurers, including AEGON, Great-West, Mass Mutual, New York
Life, and ING, have committed significant resources to develop business-owned
life insurance products for use in this market. The industry has shifted more
toward the use of variable life insurance, which contains equity investment
features to meet these needs.
At the same time, the corporations, banks, and healthcare organizations
that use these services have become more sophisticated and demanding. Clients
now regularly perform extensive due diligence on the firms providing their
compensation and benefit programs. Issues related to reputation and
technological capabilities are now central to their decision-making process. In
addition, the client's expectation regarding the level of administrative
services to be provided and technological capabilities of a provider has risen
substantially. For example, in the early 1990's, community banks went through a
consolidation phase. This consolidation gave bank executives a greater
appreciation and need for expertise regarding the impact of consolidation on
their compensation and benefit programs. This developed into a stronger demand
by the community banking industry for expert advice in addressing estate and
continuity planning. In addition, healthcare organizations have been faced with
growing challenges to attract and retain executives. The tax status of
healthcare providers, many of whom are not-for-profit healthcare organizations,
requires tailored compensation and benefits programs that comply with the
various not-for-profit compensation and benefit rules.
Our products and services have also historically been affected both
positively and negatively by legislative change. For example, prior legislation
has increased the attractiveness of non-qualified benefit plans for highly-paid
executives by limiting the amount of tax-deductible contributions to traditional
pension plans. In contrast, tax legislation was enacted in 1996 that disallowed
interest deductions on policy loans and essentially eliminated a financing
technique for corporations known as "leveraged corporate-owned life insurance."
Finalized Treasury regulations have changed the manner in which split dollar
arrangements will be taxed. The new treatment will be, in certain respects, less
attractive than the historical tax treatment of split dollar arrangements.
Additionally, provisions under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 have created
uncertainty as to whether certain split dollar policies may be used with respect
to certain executives.
On October 22, 2004, President Bush signed into law H.R. 4520, the
"American Jobs Creation Act of 2004," which included provisions affecting
deferred compensation arrangements for taxable and tax-exempt employers. The
legislation created new Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code which will
apply to voluntary deferred compensation arrangements, supplemental executive
retirement plans, stock appreciation rights ("SARs") and certain other
arrangements which have the effect of deferring compensation. Section 409A will
generally apply to compensation deferrals made after December 31, 2004. Among
other things, Section 409A will modify the times at which distributions are
permitted from nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements and will require
that elections to defer compensation be made earlier than is current practice
for many plans. The Treasury Department and the IRS issued their initial
guidance regarding Section 409A, Notice 2005-1, on December 20, 2004. This
initial guidance provides for the transition to the new rules contained in
Section 409A and further guidance is expected during 2005. Most existing
deferred compensation programs will have to be modified in accordance with the
new rules. During the transition period, it is expected that plan sponsors will
revise the structure of their current programs and formalize the changes into a
compliant plan design by the end of 2005. We believe that deferred compensation
plans remain a valuable savings tool. However, because of the time and effort
required by plan sponsors to come into compliance with the new rules and to
communicate the required changes to participants, participant compensation
deferrals may be reduced. As a result, our revenue from existing and new
arrangements may be reduced during the
8
transitional period. Beyond the transitional period, it is anticipated that
participant deferrals will return to their prior level, although the long-term
impact of the new rules remains uncertain at this time.
We believe that increasing product complexity, growing buyer
sophistication, and the changing legislative landscape requires product
development systems and personnel that are more sophisticated and cost intensive
than most producers and producer groups are able to justify economically. We
believe this will continue to drive consolidation in the industry as smaller
firms respond in order to stay competitive.
EMPLOYEES
As of December 31, 2004, we employed 920 people as follows:
Executive Benefits Practice 234
Banking Practice 282
Healthcare Group 181
Pearl Meyer & Partners 97
Human Capital Practice 38
Federal Policy Group 12
Resource Center (Corporate) and Clark Securities, Inc. 76
---
Total 920
===
The majority of our employees have college degrees, with several holding
advanced degrees in law, accounting, finance, business administration, or
actuarial science. Professional development is a highly valued industry
characteristic, and insurance and financial planning designations, such as
Chartered Life Underwriter, Fellow of the Life Management Institute, Fellow of
the Society of Actuaries and Certified Financial Planner, are held by a large
number of our employees. We actively encourage continuing education for
employees through expense reimbursement and reward plans. Due to the specialized
nature of the business, we often recruit experienced persons from insurance
companies, consulting firms, and related industries.
COMPETITION
The executive compensation and benefit consulting market is highly
competitive as the margins from this type of work are high. We compete with
consulting firms, brokers, third party administrators, producer groups, and
insurance companies. A number of our competitors offer attractive alternative
programs. The direct competitors of our Executive Benefits Practice include
Mullin Consulting, TBG Financial, and Westport Worldwide. The competitors of our
Banking Practice include Charon Planning, Benmark, and Metropolitan.
Additionally, the banking industry continues consolidating, which may reduce the
number of potential bank clients. Primary competitors of our Healthcare Group,
Pearl Meyer & Partners, and Human Capital Practice include Sullivan & Cotter,
Towers Perrin, and Mercer Consulting Group.
We compete for clients on the basis of reputation, client service,
program and product offerings, and the ability to tailor our products and
administrative services to the specific needs of a client. We believe that we
are in a superior competitive position in most of the meaningful aspects of our
business because of our track record, name recognition, quality of our
personnel, established relationships, industry focus and expertise, and
specialization. We do not consider our direct competitors to be our greatest
competitive threat. Rather, we believe that our most serious competitive threat
will likely come from large, diversified financial services organizations that
are willing to expend significant resources to enter our markets and from larger
competitors that pursue an acquisition or consolidation strategy similar to
ours.
GOVERNMENT REGULATION
State governments extensively regulate our life insurance activities.
We sell our insurance products in all 50 states and the District of Columbia
through licensed insurance producers. Insurance laws vary from state to state.
Each state has broad powers over licensing, payment of commissions, business
practices, policy forms, and premium rates. While we have not encountered
regulatory problems in the past, we cannot assure you that we will always be in
compliance with all applicable regulatory requirements of each state.
Additionally, we cannot be sure if we or our consultants or the insurance
carriers underwriting the policies will encounter regulatory problems in the
future, including any potential sanctions or penalties for operating in a state
without all required licenses.
9
While the federal government does not directly regulate the marketing
of most insurance products, securities, including variable life insurance, are
subject to federal securities laws. As a result, our consultants and entities
with which we have administrative service agreements related to selling those
products must be registered with the National Association of Securities Dealers.
We market these financial products through CSI, a wholly owned subsidiary and a
registered broker/dealer. While we have not had any regulatory problems in the
past related to these products, we cannot assure you that we or the producers
through whom we sell will be in compliance at all times with all applicable
regulatory requirements of each state.
As a result of issues arising recently in connection with the marketing
by certain companies in the property and casualty insurance, health insurance,
and group life insurance markets, there have been a series of proposals to
modify various state laws and regulations regarding insurance agents and
brokers, including proposals by the California Insurance Commissioner and the
National Association of Insurance Commissioners. These proposals, if one or more
are adopted, could impose new legal obligations, including disclosure
obligations, on us with respect to the insurance and other financial products we
market. These proposals are at an early stage and are likely to move forward
during 2005. There was also a hearing on similar issues in November 2004 in a
U.S. Senate committee. Depending on the changes, if any, which are actually
adopted by the federal government or by the states where we market insurance,
there could be an adverse impact on our revenues.
Most aspects of our business are subject to regulation by the U.S.
Federal and State regulatory agencies and securities exchanges. Aspects of our
public disclosure, corporate governance principles, and internal control
environment are subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related
regulations and rules of the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (the
"NYSE").
RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider the risks described below together with
the other information contained in this 10-K before making a decision to invest
in our common stock. The risks described below are not the only risks we face.
Additional risks and uncertainties of which we are unaware or currently believe
may be immaterial may also impair our business operations. If any of the
following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition, and operating
results could be adversely affected.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR INDUSTRY
WE ARE SUBSTANTIALLY DEPENDENT ON REVENUE GENERATED BY THE SALE OF
BUSINESS-OWNED LIFE INSURANCE POLICIES. CHANGES IN FEDERAL TAX LAWS AND
REGULATIONS COULD MATERIALLY AND ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR RENEWAL INCOME AND ABILITY
TO GAIN NEW BUSINESS.
Many of the compensation and benefit programs we design and implement
for our clients are financed with business-owned life insurance. Business-owned
life insurance programs have tax advantages associated with such products that
are attractive to our current and prospective clients. Commission revenue from
these products represented 69.1%, 72.4% and 71.4%, of our total revenues in
2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively.
Provisions under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 have created
uncertainty as to whether certain split dollar policies may be used with respect
to certain executives. The split-dollar regulations from September 2003 and the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 have significantly reduced the amount of revenue
generated from new split dollar arrangements and may further reduce revenue from
existing split dollar arrangements in the near term.
On October 22, 2004, President Bush signed into law H.R. 4520, the
"American Jobs Creation Act of 2004," which included provisions affecting
deferred compensation arrangements for taxable and tax-exempt employers. The
legislation created new Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code which will
apply to voluntary deferred compensation arrangements, supplemental executive
retirement plans, stock appreciation rights ("SARs") and certain other
arrangements which have the effect of deferring compensation. Section 409A will
generally apply to compensation deferrals made after December 31, 2004. Among
other things, Section 409A will modify the times at which distributions are
permitted from nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements and will require
that elections to defer compensation be made earlier than is current practice
for many plans. The Treasury Department and the IRS issued their initial
guidance regarding Section 409A, Notice 2005-1, on December 20, 2004. This
initial guidance provides for the transition to the new rules contained in
Section 409A and further guidance is expected during 2005. Most existing
deferred compensation programs will have to be modified in accordance with the
new rules. During the transition period, it is expected that plan sponsors will
revise the structure of their current programs and formalize the changes into a
compliant plan design by the end of 2005. We believe that deferred compensation
plans remain a valuable savings tool. However, because of the time and effort
required by plan sponsors to come into compliance with the new rules and to
communicate the required changes to participants, participant compensation
deferrals may be
10
reduced. As a result, our revenue from existing and new arrangements may be
reduced during the transitional period. Beyond the transitional period, it is
anticipated that participant deferrals will return to their prior level,
although the long-term impact of the new rules remains uncertain at this time.
There have been several recent legislative proposals to change the
federal tax laws with respect to business-owned life insurance. On September 17,
2003, the Senate Finance Committee approved legislation proposed by Sen. Jeff
Bingaman (D-NM) that would tax the death benefits taxpayers receive from certain
policies on the lives of former employees. Following an intensive lobbying
effort by the insurance industry, the Finance Committee on February 2, 2004,
reconsidered the business-owned life insurance provision it had previously
approved and, in its place, approved legislation that generally would tax the
death benefits taxpayers receive from policies on the lives of employees or
former employees only in cases where the insured person had not consented to
being covered or in the case of a former employee, or where the insured was not
among the company's highly-compensated employees at the time of policy issuance.
This same provision was reintroduced on January 31, 2005, by Senate Finance
Committee Chairman Charles Grassley (R-IA) and Senator Max Baucus (D-MT) as part
of the National Employee Savings and Trust Equity Guarantee Act (S. 219). We
believe that this most recent proposal, if enacted, would not have a material
adverse effect on our revenue from the sale of business-owned life insurance
policies. However, if Congress were to adopt legislation broadly limiting the
tax-free payment of death benefits on such policies or otherwise adversely
affecting the tax treatment of the policies, future revenue from sale of
business-owned life insurance policies could materially decline.
OUR BUSINESS IS SUBJECT TO FLUCTUATIONS IN INTEREST RATES, STOCK PRICES AND
GENERAL ECONOMIC CONDITIONS.
General economic conditions and market factors, such as changes in
interest rates and stock prices, can affect our commission and fee income and
the extent to which clients keep their policies inforce year after year. Equity
returns and interest rates can have a significant effect on the sale and
profitability of many employee benefit programs whether they are financed by
life insurance or other financial instruments. For example, if interest rates
increase, competing products could become attractive to potential purchasers of
the programs we market. When interest rates are at historically low levels, our
fixed income products become less attractive to potential purchasers. Further, a
prolonged decrease in stock prices can have an effect on the sale and
profitability of our clients' programs that are linked to stock market indices.
We cannot guarantee that we will be able to compete with alternative products if
these market forces make our clients' programs unattractive.
WE ARE SUBJECT TO REGULATION AT THE STATE LEVEL.
State governments extensively regulate life insurance activities. We
sell our insurance products in all 50 states through licensed insurance
producers operating as independent agents as well as through our employees.
States have broad powers over licensing, payments of commissions, business
practices, policy forms, and premium rates. Insurance laws related to licensing,
marketing activities, and the receipt of commissions varies from state to state.
While we have not encountered significant regulatory problems in the past, we
cannot assure you that we or the producers through whom we sell will be in
compliance at all times with all applicable regulatory requirements of each
state.
As a result of issues arising recently in connection with the marketing
by certain companies in the property and casualty insurance, health insurance,
and group life insurance markets, there have been a series of proposals to
modify various state laws and regulations regarding insurance agents and
brokers, including proposals by the California Insurance Commissioner and the
National Association of Insurance Commissioners. These proposals, if one or more
are adopted, could impose new legal obligations, including disclosure
obligations on us with respect to the insurance and other financial products we
market. These proposals are at an early stage and are likely to move forward
during 2005. Depending on the changes, if any, which are actually adopted by the
states where we market insurance, there could be an adverse impact on our
revenues.
We have entered into a number of supplemental compensation arrangements
with certain of the insurance carriers whose products we sell. The industry-wide
usage of supplemental compensation arrangements between distributors and
insurance carriers has come under scrutiny from regulatory and law enforcement
authorities. For example, the Attorney General of the State of New York has
commenced an investigation of certain practices in the insurance industry. The
Commissioner of Insurance of the State of California has proposed broad new
regulations requiring disclosure of compensation arrangements relating to the
sale of insurance products in that State, including the products we sell. While
we believe that our arrangements are in each case appropriate and consistent
with applicable law, there exists uncertainty as to whether regulatory
authorities or industry participants will seek to alter many practices in the
industry, including the terms under supplementary compensation arrangements
between distributors and insurance companies. Any changes to such practices or
terms could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
11
RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMPANY
WE FACE STRONG COMPETITION.
Our business is highly competitive. We compete with consulting firms,
insurance brokers, third party administrators, producer groups, and insurance
companies. A number of our competitors offer attractive alternative programs.
The direct competitors of our Executive Benefits Practice include Mullin
Consulting, TBG Financial, and Westport Worldwide. The competitors of our
Banking Practice include Charon Planning, Benmark, and Metropolitan.
Additionally, the banking industry is constantly consolidating, which may reduce
the number of potential bank clients. Primary competitors of our Healthcare
Group, Pearl Meyer & Partners, and Human Capital Practice include Sullivan &
Cotter, Towers Perrin, and Mercer Consulting Group.
We may also face competition from large, diversified financial services
firms willing and able to expend the resources to enter our markets and from
large direct competitors that choose to pursue an acquisition or consolidation
strategy similar to ours.
WE ARE DEPENDENT ON CERTAIN KEY PRODUCERS.
Our top three producers collectively accounted for approximately 6.0%
of our total revenue in 2004, 7.4% of our total revenue in 2003, and 6.8% of our
total revenue in 2002. We enter into agreements with our producers in which they
agree not to compete with us for a period of time after their relationship with
us terminates. We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain producer
relationships with our most productive producers or that any non-compete
provisions in the agreements will be honored or enforceable. Our business could
suffer in the future as a result of the loss of any of our most productive
producers.
OUR BUSINESS DEPENDS ON THE RENEWAL COMMISSIONS WE GENERATE FROM THE LIFE
INSURANCE POLICIES UNDERLYING OUR CLIENTS' COMPENSATION AND BENEFIT PROGRAMS.
We derive a substantial portion of our revenue from the renewal
commissions we earn on the business-owned life insurance policies and other
financial instruments that underlie our clients' compensation and benefit
programs. We earn these annual commissions so long as the underlying policies
remain in existence. If a client chooses to cancel a policy, we will stop
receiving any renewal commissions and fees on that policy. In addition, if a
client delays or reduces the annual premiums it pays on the underlying policy
due to a flexible premium structure or financial difficulties, our renewal
commissions will be correspondingly delayed or reduced.
OUR QUARTERLY OPERATING RESULTS VARY DRAMATICALLY.
Our operating results fluctuate considerably from quarter to quarter.
We have experienced and may continue to experience large concentrations of
revenue in the first and fourth quarters. Our operating results may be affected
by a number of factors including: a significant portion of the funding for our
bank-owned life insurance products occurs in the fourth calendar quarter, many
deferred compensation plans marketed by our Executive Benefits Practice are
financed in the first calendar quarter; and the timing of significant sales can
have a material impact on our quarterly operating results.
Our revenue is difficult to forecast, and we believe that comparing our
consecutive quarterly results of operations is not meaningful, nor does it
indicate what results we will achieve for any subsequent period. In our
business, past operating results are not consistently reliable indicators of
future performance. Significant downward fluctuations in our quarterly operating
results could result in a sharp decline in the trading price of our common
stock. See further discussion about the quarterly operating results in Note 25,
"Interim Financial Data (Unaudited)" to the Consolidated Financial Statements,
which appear under Item 15 "Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules."
WE ARE DEPENDENT ON OUR MANAGEMENT TEAM.
Our performance depends largely on the performance of our executive
officers and key employees. It is important to us to keep and motivate high
quality personnel, especially our management, consultants, and program
development teams. The loss of the services of any of our key employees could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and
operating results. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in retaining
our key personnel.
12
WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY IMPLEMENT OUR ACQUISITION STRATEGY OR
INTEGRATE THE BUSINESSES WE ACQUIRE.
Since September 1997, we have completed 26 acquisitions. At any point
in time, we may also be considering several other potential acquisitions. Future
acquisitions may require substantial expenditures that will be financed through
cash from operations, or bank debt as well as future debt and/or equity
offerings. We cannot assure you that funds will be available from banks or
through the capital markets or that they will be available on terms acceptable
to us. If funds are not available, we may be unable to fully implement our
acquisition strategy.
Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including the diversion of our
management's time and attention to the negotiation of the transaction and to the
integration of the businesses acquired, the possible need to modify financial
and other systems and add management resources, the potential loss of employees
of the acquired businesses, the risks of entering new markets with which we have
limited experience, and unforeseen difficulties in the acquired operations. An
acquisition may not produce the revenue and profits we expect. Thus, an
acquisition that fails to meet our expectations could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition, and operating results.
A SUBSTANTIAL PORTION OF OUR TOTAL ASSETS ARE REPRESENTED BY INTANGIBLE ASSETS.
When we acquire a company, we normally acquire few tangible assets.
Therefore, substantially the entire purchase price for the acquisition is
allocated to intangible assets. The three primary components of our intangible
assets are inforce revenue, goodwill, and non-compete agreements. The amounts of
purchase price allocated to inforce revenue are determined by discounting the
cash flow of future commissions adjusted for expected persistency, mortality,
and associated costs. The persistency of our inforce business is influenced by
many factors outside of our control, and we cannot be sure that the value we
have allocated will ultimately be realized. Non-compete agreements are amortized
over the period of the agreements and other identifiable intangibles are
amortized over their useful lives. The balance of the purchase price not
allocated to identifiable intangible assets is classified as goodwill.
If any component of our inforce revenue should become unrealizable,
this could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition,
and operating results. We cannot assure you that all of our inforce revenue will
be realizable or that accounting regulatory bodies will not impose different
amortization methods.
A MAJORITY OF OUR COMMISSION REVENUE IS DERIVED FROM POLICIES WRITTEN BY A
LIMITED NUMBER OF INSURANCE COMPANIES.
We depend on a select group of insurance companies to underwrite the
insurance policies underlying the programs we sell. During 2004, 33 life
insurance companies underwrote substantially all of the insurance policies
underlying our clients' programs. Seven of these companies accounted for
approximately 55.3% of our first year commission revenue in 2004, 55.7% in 2003,
and 48.3% in 2002. If our relationship with any of these insurance companies, or
their financial condition, were to significantly change for any reason, we could
experience a disruption in our ability to provide products and services to our
clients. Although we believe such disruption would only be short-term and that
we would not experience any difficulties in securing replacement relationships
with similar insurance companies, any long-term delays in doing so could affect
our ability to provide competitive financing alternatives to our clients.
MAJOR STOCKHOLDERS HAVE THE ABILITY TO INFLUENCE STOCKHOLDER ACTION.
AEGON, Columbia Wanger Asset Management, and Dimensional Fund Advisors
owned approximately 12.4%, 9.8%, and 7.7% respectively, of our outstanding
common stock as of December 31, 2004. Tom Wamberg, our Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer, owned approximately 9.7% of our outstanding common stock as
of December 31, 2004. As a result, these stockholders are able to exercise
significant influence over all matters requiring stockholder approval, including
the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions.
This concentration of ownership may also have the effect of delaying,
preventing, or deterring a change in control that may otherwise be beneficial to
stockholders.
WE ARE SUBJECT TO LITIGATION WHICH MAY HAVE A NEGATIVE IMPACT ON OUR BUSINESS
AND REPUTATION.
From time to time, we are subject to lawsuits and other claims, which
are being handled and defended in the ordinary course of business. While we are
unable to predict the outcome of these matters, we do not believe, based upon
currently available facts, that the ultimate resolution of any of such pending
matters will have a material adverse effect on our overall financial condition,
results of operations, or cash flows. However, adverse developments could
negatively impact earnings in a particular future period. See Item 3, "Legal
Proceedings."
13
ERRORS OR OMISSIONS IN THE SERVICES WE PROVIDE OUR CLIENTS MAY RESULT IN
LIABILITIES WHICH COULD HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR BUSINESS AND
REPUTATION.
We market, design, and administer sophisticated financial products and
we provide actuarial and other professional services in connection with
marketing, designing, and administering these programs. Our clients rely upon
the services and interpretations rendered by our employees. To the extent any
services or interpretations provided by our employees prove to be inaccurate, we
may be liable for the damages, and such liability, to the extent not covered by
existing insurance, could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition, and results of operations.
WE ARE DEPENDENT ON OUR INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS.
Our ability to provide administrative services depends on our capacity
to store, retrieve, process, and manage significant databases and expand and
upgrade periodically our information processing capabilities. Interruption or
loss of our information processing capabilities through loss of stored data,
breakdown, or malfunctioning of computer equipment and software systems,
telecommunications failure, or damage caused by fire, tornadoes, lightning,
electrical power outage, or other disruption could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Although
we have disaster recovery procedures in place and insurance to protect against
such contingencies, we cannot assure you that such insurance or services will
continue to be available at reasonable prices, cover all such losses or
compensate us for the possible loss of clients occurring during any period that
we are unable to provide services.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMMON STOCK
THE TRADING PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK MAY BE SUBJECT TO SIGNIFICANT
FLUCTUATIONS.
The trading price of our common stock could fluctuate significantly in
response to variations in our operating results, changes in earnings estimates,
changes in our business, and changes in general market or economic conditions.
In addition, in recent years the stock market has experienced significant price
and volume fluctuations. Such market fluctuations could result in a sharp
decline in the trading price of our common stock and the value of your
investment.
THE ISSUANCE OF ADDITIONAL COMMON STOCK MAY DILUTE OTHER STOCKHOLDERS.
We have an aggregate of 18,112,173 shares of common stock authorized
but unissued and not reserved for specific purposes. We may issue all of these
shares without any action or approval by our stockholders. As of December 31,
2004, we had an aggregate of 2,042,262 unissued shares reserved for issuance
under our employee and director incentive plans. In addition, approximately 35
thousand shares (based on the December 31, 2004 closing price of $15.52 per
share) are subject to issuance as contingent payments in connection with our
recent acquisitions, if stipulated revenue and/or financial targets are
achieved. We intend to continue to actively pursue acquisitions of competitors
and related businesses and may issue shares of common stock in connection with
those acquisitions. Any shares issued in connection with our acquisitions, the
exercise of stock options, or otherwise would dilute the percentage ownership
held by existing stockholders.
EXISTING STOCKHOLDERS CAN SELL A SUBSTANTIAL NUMBER OF THEIR SHARES IN THE
PUBLIC MARKET WHICH COULD DEPRESS OUR STOCK PRICE.
Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the open
market, or the perception that such sales could occur, could adversely affect
the trading price of our common stock. Mr. Wamberg held 1,790,680 shares as of
December 31, 2004, representing approximately 9.7% of the outstanding shares of
common stock. Institutional investors (that individually hold in excess of 5% of
our outstanding shares) cumulatively represent 5,498,253 shares or approximately
29.9% of the outstanding shares of common stock. Mr. Wamberg has entered into a
previously disclosed share sale program pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that involves the sale of Clark shares that Mr.
Wamberg has held in excess of one year. Any sales of our common stock by Mr.
Wamberg or the other principal stockholders could adversely affect the trading
price of our common stock.
14
DELAWARE LAW AND OUR CHARTER DOCUMENTS COULD PREVENT AN UNSOLICITED TAKEOVER.
Delaware law, as well as provisions of our certificate of incorporation
and bylaws, could discourage unsolicited proposals to acquire us, even though
such a proposal may be beneficial to stockholders. These provisions include a
board of directors classified into three classes of directors with the directors
of each class having staggered, three-year terms, our board's authority to issue
shares of preferred stock without stockholder approval, and Delaware law
restrictions on many business combinations and prohibitions on removing
directors serving on a staggered board for any reason other than "for cause."
In addition, we have adopted a stockholder rights plan that could
further discourage attempts to acquire control of us. These provisions of our
certificate of incorporation, bylaws, and Delaware law could discourage tender
offers or other transactions that might otherwise result in your receiving a
premium over the market price for our common stock.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
As of December 31, 2004, we operated in the following leased locations
throughout the United States:
NUMBER OF SQUARE
PRACTICE OFFICES FOOTAGE
-------- --------- -------
Executive Benefits Practice 7 123,366
Banking Practice 16 86,385
Healthcare Group 2 67,564
Pearl Meyer & Partners 2 34,284
Human Capital Practice (1)(2) 3 40,807
Federal Policy Group 1 4,832
Resource Center 1 17,783
-- -------
Total 32 375,021
== =======
- --------------
(1) Effective January 1, 2005, the Human Capital Practice was merged into the
Executive Benefits Practice.
(2) Two subtenants occupy one of the three Human Capital Practice locations.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time, we are involved in various claims and lawsuits
incidental to our business, including claims and lawsuits alleging breaches of
contractual obligations under agreements with our employee consultants and
independent producers. The following is a summary of the current material legal
proceedings pending against us.
WILLIAM L. MACDONALD, SR. V. CLARK/BARDES CONSULTING, INC.
On April 10, 2003, William L. MacDonald, Sr., the former Chairman of
the Executive Benefits Practice, filed suit in Los Angeles California Superior
Court alleging wrongful termination and seeking damages of $10.1 million and a
declaration that all of his non-competition and non-solicitation provisions were
unenforceable. On April 11, 2003, we filed proceedings in the Circuit Court of
Cook County, Illinois to enforce the non-competition and non-solicitation
covenants agreed to by Mr. MacDonald when we purchased Mr. MacDonald's business,
Compensation Resource Group, Inc., in September of 2000. In light of the
California suit, the Illinois litigation was stayed pending the outcome of
proceeding in the California court.
We responded to Mr. MacDonald's suit by requesting the California court
to transfer the matter to arbitration as provided for in several of the
contracts at issue, and to enter a temporary restraining order prohibiting Mr.
MacDonald from competing with us and contacting our clients, in aid of and
pending the outcome of the arbitration. On May 1, 2003, the Court granted our
motion and entered a temporary restraining order prohibiting Mr. MacDonald from
contacting certain clients of ours. On June 5, 2003, the Court entered a
preliminary injunction, which prohibited Mr. MacDonald and persons acting in
concert with him from soliciting clients of our Executive Benefits Practice. On
July 24, 2003, the Court issued its order granting our Motion to Compel
Arbitration. Thereafter, the matter was settled by the parties. On June 30,
2004, the Arbitration Panel incorporated the settlement in an Award, which
provides that Mr. MacDonald will not solicit and will do no business with our
current Executive Benefits Practice clients until September 5, 2005.
15
FRIEDA SHUSTER, ET AL. V. HYDER MIRZA, ET AL. INCLUDING CLARK/BARDES, INC.
On May 30, 2001, we were named as a defendant in a lawsuit initially
filed in the District Court of LaSalle County, Texas, now in Dallas County,
Texas, alleging gross negligence in connection with the death of an employee
when the private aircraft in which he was traveling on company business crashed.
Damages are unspecified. On February 12, 2004, settlement was reached with the
lead plaintiff. The trial for the remaining plaintiffs began February 24, 2005.
We deny any and all claims and allegations in this action and intend to
vigorously defend this matter. The matter is covered by our existing insurance.
BASSETT FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED V. CLARK CONSULTING, INC. (F/K/A
CLARK/BARDES, INC.)
On November, 29, 2004, Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated
("Bassett") filed a civil action against us in the United States District Court
for the Western District of Virginia, Danville Division, in which Bassett
alleges, among other things, fraud, professional negligence, breach of fiduciary
duty and breach of contract in connection with a broad-based corporate owned
life insurance program purchased by Bassett in 1994. The relief sought by
Bassett includes compensatory damages in an unspecified amount in excess of $3
million, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, and attorneys' fees. We
believe we have meritorious defenses to Bassett's claims and we intend to
vigorously defend the matter.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year
covered by this Form 10-K to a vote of our security holders, through the
solicitation of proxies or otherwise.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Effective June 9, 2003, our common stock began trading on the New York
Stock Exchange under the symbol "CLK." From March 7, 2002 through June 8, 2003,
our common stock was traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
"CBC." Prior to that, our common stock was traded on the NASDAQ National Market
under the symbol "CLKB."
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and
low closing prices for our common stock, as reported on the New York Stock
Exchange.
HIGH LOW
---- ---
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003:
First Quarter................................................................... $19.48 $10.50
Second Quarter.................................................................. 12.87 10.78
Third Quarter................................................................... 16.65 11.94
Fourth Quarter.................................................................. 19.76 13.80
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004:
First Quarter................................................................... $20.70 $16.47
Second Quarter.................................................................. 20.30 16.51
Third Quarter................................................................... 18.83 12.41
Fourth Quarter.................................................................. 16.65 12.91
FIRST QUARTER TO FEBRUARY 24, 2005.............................................. $17.46 $12.19
The closing price of our common stock on February 24, 2005, as reported
on the New York Stock Exchange, was $17.46 per share. As of February 24, 2005,
we had 18,333,732 outstanding shares of common stock. As of January 31, 2005, we
had approximately 430 stockholders of record, which does not include shares held
in securities position listings.
DIVIDEND POLICY
We will pay a dividend of $0.06 per common share on April 1, 2005 to
stockholders of record as of March 1, 2005. We intend to pay a similar dividend
each quarter, assuming we have adequate capital availability, that we continue
to be permitted to pay dividends
16
under our senior credit facility, and that cash dividends continue to be in the
best interests of our stockholders and us. We can provide no assurance that we
will pay cash dividends for any future period or that our current cash dividend
will remain at the current level.
RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
On December 14, 2004, we issued 5,179 shares of our common stock to
William Sheehan, a previous owner of W.M. Sheehan & Company, for attaining
established criteria as outlined in the purchase agreement related to our
acquisition of W.M. Sheehan. The sale of the securities to Mr. Sheehan was made
in reliance upon the Section 4(2) exemption from the registration provisions of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
Information regarding our equity compensation plans, including both
stockholder approved plans and non-stockholder approved plans, is set forth in
the section entitled "Executive Compensation - Equity Compensation Plan
Information" in our Proxy Statement, to be filed within 120 days after our
fiscal year end of December 31, 2004, which information is incorporated herein
by reference.
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
The following table sets forth information in connection with purchases
made by, or on behalf of, us or any affiliated purchaser of ours, of shares of
our common stock during the quarterly period ended December 31, 2004.
AVERAGE TOTAL NUMBER OF SHARES MAXIMUM NUMBER (OR APPROXIMATE
TOTAL NUMBER PRICE PURCHASED AS PART OF DOLLAR VALUE) OF SHARES THAT MAY YET
OF SHARES PAID PER PUBLICLY ANNOUNCED PLANS BE PURCHASED UNDER THE PLANS OR
PERIOD PURCHASED(1)(2) SHARE OR PROGRAMS PROGRAMS(2)
------ --------------- ----- ----------- -----------
October 1, 2004
through
October 31, 2004 0 0
November 1, 2004
through
November 30, 2004 228,300 $14.26 228,300 $5.19 million
December 1, 2004
through
December 31, 2004 149,400 16.19 149,400 $2.78 million
------- ------ -------
Total 377,700 $15.02 377,700
======= ====== =======
- --------------
(1) In January 2003, our Board of Directors authorized the purchase of up to
400 thousand shares of our common stock to, among other things, fulfill our
obligations under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The Employee Stock
Purchase Plan consists of four semi-annual offerings of common stock
beginning on each January 1 and July 1 in each of the years 2003 and 2004
and terminating on June 30 and December 31 of each such year. For each of
the years 2005 and 2006, the Employee Stock Purchase Plan will consist of
four quarterly offerings of common stock beginning on the first day of
January, April, July and October and terminating on March 31, June 30,
September 30, and December 31 of each such year. The maximum number of
shares issued in any of the semi-annual and quarterly offerings is 50
thousand and 25 thousand, respectively.
17
(2) On November 23, 2004, our Board of Directors authorized us to repurchase up
to $10 million of our outstanding common stock on the open market, an
increase of $5 million from the original authorized level of $5 million. On
January 25, 2005, our Board of Directors authorized us to expand our
existing stock repurchase program to a total of $15 million of our
outstanding common stock, from the previously authorized level of $10
million.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
(Dollars in thousands except share and per share amounts)
The following historical information should be read in conjunction with
information included elsewhere herein, including the consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto and Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." The results of operations
presented below are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that
may be achieved in the future.
2004 2003(1) 2002(3) 2001(4) 2000(5)
---- ------- ------- ------- -------
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
TOTAL REVENUE............................... $315,582 $325,929 $278,586 $236,884 $149,567
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
OPERATING EXPENSES..........................
Commissions and fees...................... 74,292 88,615 90,273 84,002 50,804
Other operating expenses (2).............. 188,352 192,836 154,600 121,331 77,873
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
OPERATING INCOME............................ $ 52,938 $ 44,478 $ 33,713 $ 31,551 $ 20,890
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
NET INCOME $ 18,160 $ 12,682 $ 17,328 $ 16,012 $ 11,448
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
BASIC EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE $ 0.98 $ 0.69 $ 1.03 $ 1.22 $ 1.07
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE $ 0.97 $ 0.68 $ 0.99 $ 1.18 $ 1.05
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
TOTAL ASSETS $701,293 $699,303 $734,675 $269,931 $219,855
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
LONG-TERM DEBT $309,622 $335,968 $396,038 $ 6,079 $ 52,605
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
- --------------
(1) Includes the results of operations subsequent to the date of acquisition of
the following:
o Executive Benefits Solutions LLC as of September 30, 2003
o Blackwood Planning Corporation as of October 7, 2003
(2) In 2003, we received $1.5 million from the favorable settlement of a
lawsuit and we incurred operating expense of $7.5 million in connection
with the reorganization of the Human Capital Practice. In 2001, we incurred
an operating expense of $2.1 million in connection with the write-down of
assets acquired from Insurance Alliances Group.
(3) Includes the results of operations subsequent to the date of acquisition of
the following:
o Federal Policy Group as of February 25, 2002
o Hilgenberg and Associates as of April 25, 2002
o Comiskey Kaufman as of April 26, 2002
o LongMiller & Associates, LLC as of November 26, 2002
(4) Includes the results of operations subsequent to the date of acquisition of
the following:
o Rich Florin/Solutions, Inc. (f.d.b.a. Executive Alliance) as of March
12, 2001
o Partners First as of March 23, 2001
o Management Science Associates, Inc. as of July 24, 2001
o Lyons Compensation & Benefits, LLC as of August 31, 2001
o Coates Kenney as of December 26, 2001
(5) Includes the results of operations subsequent to the date of acquisition of
the following:
o Christiansen & Associates as of January 1, 2000
o The Watson Company as of February 1, 2000
o Insurance Alliances Group as of May 5, 2000
o W.M. Sheehan & Company, Inc. as of June 13, 2000
o Pearl Meyer & Partners, Inc. as of June 21, 2000
o Compensation Resource Group as of September 6, 2000
o Forrest, Wagner & Associates as of October 23, 2000
18
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
(Tables shown in thousands of dollars, except per share amounts)
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and
results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated
financial statements, the notes thereto and other information appearing
elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
OVERVIEW
We design, market, and administer compensation and benefit programs for
companies supplementing and securing employee benefits and provide executive
compensation and related consulting services to U.S. corporations, banks, and
healthcare organizations. We generally compete with regional firms while we
market our products and services nationwide. A majority of our revenues result
from commissions paid by insurance companies that underwrite the insurance
policies used to finance our clients' benefit programs. Most of our clients'
benefit programs are financed by business-owned life insurance and other
financial products. We pay commissions to employees and independent producers
based upon a percentage of our commission revenue. We work closely with clients
to design customized products that meet the specific organizational needs of the
client and with insurance companies to develop unique policy features and
competitive pricing.
A significant portion of our growth has been acquisition related.
Business-owned life insurance programs have tax advantages associated with the
products that are attractive to our clients. A portion of our product offerings
are interest rate sensitive. Changes in tax and legislative laws can have an
affect on our business, as seen over the last several years with our Executive
Benefits Practice. We have been expanding our compensation consulting practices
to diversify our product offerings. The largest component of our general and
administrative expenses is salary and other employee related costs.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
Tax and legislative initiatives
In recent years, the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") has undertaken a
major enforcement initiative to disallow the interest deductions on certain
leveraged business-owned life insurance programs sold during or prior to 1995.
The IRS has, with one exception, prevailed on the cases it has litigated to date
related to this initiative and recently made a temporary (now expired) public
settlement offer to address ongoing cases. While we stopped selling leveraged
business-owned life insurance programs after 1995 and we do not expect any
material adverse impact on our revenue from this enforcement initiative, it is
impossible to determine the impact of this initiative on a client's decision to
continue or surrender an existing leveraged business-owned life insurance
program.
There have been several recent legislative proposals to change the
federal tax laws with respect to business-owned life insurance. On September 17,
2003, the Senate Finance Committee approved legislation proposed by Sen. Jeff
Bingaman (D-NM) that would tax the death benefits taxpayers receive from certain
policies on the lives of former employees. Following an intensive lobbying
effort by the insurance industry, the Finance Committee on February 2, 2004,
reconsidered the business-owned life insurance provision it had previously
approved and, in its place, approved legislation that generally would tax the
death benefits taxpayers receive from policies on the lives of employees or
former employees only in cases where the insured person had not consented to
being covered or in the case of a former employee, or where the insured was not
among the company's highly-compensated employees at the time of policy issuance.
This same provision was reintroduced on January 31, 2005, by Senate Finance
Committee Chairman Charles Grassley (R-IA) and Senator Max Baucus (D-MT) as part
of the National Employee Savings and Trust Equity Guarantee Act (S. 219). We
believe that this most recent proposal, if enacted, would not have a material
adverse effect on our revenue from the sale of business-owned life insurance
policies. However, if Congress were to adopt legislation broadly limiting the
tax-free payment of death benefits on such policies or otherwise adversely
affecting the tax treatment of the policies, future revenue from sale of
business-owned life insurance policies could materially decline.
On October 22, 2004, President Bush signed into law H.R. 4520, the
"American Jobs Creation Act of 2004," which included provisions affecting
deferred compensation arrangements for taxable and tax-exempt employers. The
legislation created new Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code which will
apply to voluntary deferred compensation arrangements, supplemental executive
retirement plans, stock appreciation rights ("SARs") and certain other
arrangements which have the effect of deferring compensation. Section 409A will
generally apply to compensation deferrals made after December 31, 2004. Among
other things, Section 409A will modify the times at which distributions are
permitted from nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements and
19
will require that elections to defer compensation be made earlier than is
current practice for many plans. The Treasury Department and the IRS issued
their initial guidance regarding Section 409A, Notice 2005-1, on December 20,
2004. This initial guidance provides for the transition to the new rules
contained in Section 409A and further guidance is expected during 2005. Most
existing deferred compensation programs will have to be modified in accordance
with the new rules. During the transition period, it is expected that plan
sponsors will revise the structure of their current programs and formalize the
changes into a compliant plan design by the end of 2005. We believe that
deferred compensation plans remain a valuable savings tool. However, because of
the time and effort required by plan sponsors to come into compliance with the
new rules and to communicate the required changes to participants, participant
compensation deferrals may be reduced. As a result, our revenue from existing
and new arrangements may be reduced during the transitional period. Beyond the
transitional period, it is anticipated that participant deferrals will return to
their prior level, although the long-term impact of the new rules remains
uncertain at this time.
As a result of issues arising recently in connection with the marketing by
certain companies in the property and casualty insurance, health insurance, and
group life insurance markets, there have been a series of proposals to modify
various state laws and regulations regarding insurance agents and brokers,
including proposals by the California Insurance Commissioner and the National
Association of Insurance Commissioners. These proposals, if one or more are
adopted, could impose new legal obligations, including disclosure obligations,
on us with respect to the insurance and other financial products we market.
These proposals are at an early stage and are likely to move forward during
2005. There was also a hearing on similar issues in November 2004 in a U.S.
Senate committee. Depending on the changes, if any, which are actually adopted
by the federal government or by the states where we market insurance, there
could be an adverse impact on our revenues.
Change in insurable interest laws
There have been several recent proposals in various states (e.g., Georgia,
Texas, Illinois, and Washington) to change the insurable interest and other
state laws governing the ability of an employer to purchase or hold life
insurance on the lives of employees. In 2003, California enacted legislation
prohibiting the purchase of business-owned life insurance on the lives of
employees not exempt from wage and hour laws (a group of employees not typically
insured under the arrangements we market). Significant segments of the life
insurance industry are engaged in an ongoing, intensive effort to prevent the
enactment of state law changes that would have an adverse impact on
business-owned life insurance. If one or more states were to adopt proposals
broadly limiting the ability of employers to purchase or hold life insurance on
the lives of employees, the market for these policies would be reduced and a
number of existing policies could be surrendered or exchanged, with a resulting
reduction in our revenues from these arrangements.
Other
On January 25, 2005, our Board of Directors authorized us to pay a dividend
of $0.06 per share to all stockholders of record as of March 1, 2005, payable on
April 1, 2005. We intend to pay a similar dividend each quarter, assuming we
have adequate capital availability, that we continue to be permitted to pay
dividends under our senior credit facility, and that cash dividends continue to
be in the best interests of our stockholders and us. The Board of Directors also
authorized us to expand our existing stock repurchase program to a total of $15
million of our outstanding common stock, from the previously authorized level of
$10 million.
As a result of the surrender of a number of insurance policies by a single
customer of ours in December 2004, we will cease receiving commissions and
related payments in respect of such surrendered insurance policies. We estimate
that the amount of such commissions and related payments is approximately $1
million per year, which is less than one percent of our renewal commission
revenues in 2004. The amount of commissions and related payments included in the
2002 Securitization will be directed solely to the payment of principal and
interest on the notes and related administration fees and expenses associated
with the 2002 Securitization until such time as the Reserve Account established
as part of the 2002 Securitization is replenished.
20
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. The Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") has
defined a company's most critical accounting policies as those that are most
important to the portrayal of its financial condition and the results of
operations, and which require us to make difficult and subjective judgments,
often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters that are inherently
uncertain. Although we believe that our estimates and assumptions are
reasonable, they are based upon information available when they are made. Actual
results may differ significantly from these estimates under different
assumptions and conditions.
REVENUE SOURCES AND RECOGNITION
Our operating segments derive revenue primarily from:
o commissions paid by insurance companies issuing the policies
underlying our benefit programs;
o program design and administrative service fees paid by our clients;
o executive compensation and benefit and related consulting fees; and
o fees for legislative liaison and related advisory services.
Our commission revenue is normally recurring, is typically paid annually
and usually extends for a period of twenty years or more after the sale.
Commissions are paid by insurance companies and vary by policy and by program
and typically represent a percentage of the premium or the cash surrender value
of the insurance policies underlying the program.
First Year Commission Revenue and Related Fees. First year commission
revenue and related fees are derived from two principal sources: (a) the
commission we earn when the client first purchases the policies, which revenue
is recognized at the time the application is substantially completed, the client
is contractually committed to purchase the insurance policies and the premiums
are paid (which is the effective date of the insurance policy) by the client to
the insurance company or, in certain instances, when cash is received; and (b)
fees for the services related to the enrollment and initial administration of
the benefit programs and underlying policies.
Our first year commission revenue is frequently subject to chargeback,
which means that insurance companies retain the right to recover commissions
paid in the event policies prematurely terminate. The chargeback schedules
differ by product and usually apply to first year commission only.
A typical chargeback schedule, based on a percent of first year commission,
is as follows:
Year 1 100%
Year 2 and 3 50%
Year 4 25%
Year 5 and beyond 0%
Given the homogenous nature of such cases and historical information about
chargebacks, we believe we are able to accurately estimate the revenue earned.
We currently maintain a chargeback allowance, which is monitored on a quarterly
basis for adequacy. The chargeback allowance is calculated based on the average
percentage rate of the last two years of chargebacks multiplied by the first
year revenue for the trailing twelve months.
Renewal Commission Revenue and Related Fees. Renewal revenue is recognized
on the date that the renewal premium is due or paid by the client to the
insurance company depending on whether a policy is considered fixed or variable.
Fixed renewal policies have predictable set premium amounts. Revenue on these
policies is recognized on the premium due date. Variable renewal policy premiums
can be based upon such items as value of underlying investments in the policy,
cash surrender value of the policy, or mutual fund values. In some cases, we are
able to obtain information directly from the carriers allowing us to reasonably
and reliably estimate the expected renewal premiums. Revenue is recognized based
upon these estimates at a policy's renewal date. For those
21
policies where we are unable to obtain information to reasonably estimate the
expected renewal premiums, revenue is not recognized until the confirmation has
been received from the insurance carrier that the client's premium payment has
been received. We are notified in advance if a client plans to surrender, so
adjustments in subsequent periods due to cancellations are infrequent and minor.
Revenue associated with policies to be surrendered is not recognized.
Consulting Fee Revenue. Consulting fee revenue consists of fees charged by
Pearl Meyer & Partners, Human Capital Practice, and Federal Policy Group for the
services we perform in advising our clients on their executive compensation
programs and related consulting services, retirement, benefit, actuarial,
pension savings plan design and management, people strategy, compensation
surveys, institutional registered investment advisory services, and fees from
legislative and regulatory policy matters. These fees are generally based on a
rate per hour arrangement or a fixed monthly fee and are earned when the service
is rendered. Consulting revenue generated by the Executive Benefits Practice,
Banking Practice, and Healthcare Group is included in the first year revenue
line on our consolidated statements of income.
Administrative Service Fee Revenue. Administrative service fee revenues
consist of fees we charge our clients for the administration of their benefit
programs and are earned when services are rendered. These revenues are mainly
included in our renewal revenue line on our consolidated statements of income.
Supplemental Compensation Arrangements. A portion of our revenue is derived
from certain supplemental compensation arrangements with insurance carriers.
These arrangements generate additional revenue with respect to primarily
existing and, to a lesser extent, new blocks of business. Payments under such
arrangements are typically based on the cash value (or fair value) of our
existing in-force business with these carriers at specified dates of measurement
and, to a much lesser extent, based on the value of new business generated. We
realized approximately $11.3 million, $10.3 million and $7.5 million in revenue
under such arrangements for the twelve months ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and
2002, respectively.
We record revenue on a gross basis when we:
o act as the principal in the transaction by helping clients select the
right product or service;
o take responsibility for the acceptability of the products and
services;
o provide services through employees and exclusive independent
producers;
o have latitude in establishing the price the customer will pay;
o have discretion in carrier selection with multiple carriers;
o have chargeback and credit risk; and/or
o are viewed by the client as the administrator of the program once the
product is sold.
We record revenue on a net basis when we provide a lead on a case (in the
capacity of a finder) and another company has control of the case and bears the
credit risk (i.e., working directly with a client to determine the product and
design of the plan).
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Our intangible assets include the excess of the costs of acquired
businesses over the fair values of the tangible net assets associated with an
acquisition. Intangible assets also consist of the net present value of future
cash flows from policies inforce at the acquisition date, non-compete agreements
with the former owners, other identifiable intangibles, and goodwill.
Non-compete agreements are amortized over the period of the agreements and other
identifiable intangibles are amortized over their useful lives.
The net present value of inforce revenue is typically amortized between 20
and 30 years (the expected average policy duration). The determination of the
amortization schedule involves making certain assumptions related to
persistency, expenses, and discount rates that are used in the calculation of
the carrying value of inforce revenue. If any of these assumptions change or
actual experience differs materially from the assumptions used, it could affect
the carrying value of the inforce revenue.
22
We are required to assess potential impairments of long-lived assets in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 144,
Accounting for Impairment of Long-Lived Assets, if events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a long-lived asset may not be
recoverable. In assessing the recoverability of goodwill in accordance with SFAS
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, and the net present value of
future cash flows from policies inforce, we must make assumptions regarding
estimated future cash flows, mortality, lapse, and other factors to determine
the fair value of the respective assets. If these estimates and related
assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record impairment
charges.
INCOME TAXES
Significant judgement is required in determining the provision for income
taxes and related accruals, deferred tax assets and liabilities, and any
valuation allowance recorded against the deferred tax assets. In the ordinary
course of business, there are transactions and calculations where the ultimate
tax outcome is uncertain. Additionally, our tax returns are subject to audit by
federal and various state authorities. Although we believe our estimates are
reasonable, no assurance can be given that the final tax outcome will not be
materially different from that which is reflected in our historical income tax
provisions and accruals. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets,
we consider the likelihood that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets
may not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is
dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in
which the temporary differences become deductible. We consider the scheduled
reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax
planning strategies in making this assessment.
RESTRUCTURING COSTS
We make provisions for restructuring costs in accordance with SFAS No. 146,
Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. To determine
the amounts expensed in any period, we estimate the amounts we will receive in
the future for subleasing office space that is no longer required for our
existing operations. Should these estimates not reflect actual results in future
periods, we adjust the provision through the income statement.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003
Financial Statement Overview. Our revenue for the year ended December 31,
2004 was $315.6 million, compared to $325.9 million for the year ended December
31, 2003, a decrease of 3.2%. Our net income for 2004 was $18.2 million,
compared to $12.7 million in 2003. Diluted earnings per share for 2004 were
$0.97, compared to $0.68 for 2003.
Revenue. Total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2004 were $315.6
million, a decrease of 3.2% from revenues of $325.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003. First year revenues for the year ended December 31, 2004 were
$97.5 million compared to $113.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2003.
First year revenue of the Banking Practice was $19.5 million less for the year
ended December 31, 2004 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2003 due to
clients' efforts in mid 2003 to lock in interest rates prior to anticipated
interest rate reductions in late 2003. Revenue for the years ended December 31,
2004 and 2003 included approximately $11.3 million and $10.3 million,
respectively, related to supplemental compensation arrangements with insurance
carriers. Renewal revenue for the year ended December 31, 2004, was $157.5
compared to $159.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. The decrease in
renewal revenue is primarily the result of over funding of certain corporate
plans. Consulting fees as a percentage of total revenue increased to 17.3% for
the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to 14.5% in the year ended December
31, 2003. For the year ended December 31, 2004, executive compensation
consulting services experienced an increase in demand over the prior year due to
increased focus on corporate governance and executive compensation.
Commission and fee expense. Commission and fee expense for the year ended
December 31, 2004 was $74.3 million, or 23.5% of total revenue, compared to
$88.6 million, or 27.2% of total revenue, for the year ended December 31, 2003.
The amount paid in commission expense (both in dollar terms and as a percent of
revenue) declined primarily due to an increasing percentage of sales by employee
consultants who have a lower commission rate than independent producers. In the
second half of 2003, Banking Practice acquired two of its former independent
producer organizations. Some of the commission savings from sales by employees
is spent in the form of increased operating expenses. Independent producers
cover their operating expenses out of their commissions. Also impacting the
commission percentage to revenue is the higher amounts of supplemental
compensation arrangement revenues and consulting revenues that have no related
commission expense.
23
General and administrative expense. General and administrative expense for
the year ended December 31, 2004 was $164.3 million, or 52.1% of total revenue,
compared to $158.9 million, or 48.8% of total revenue for the year ended
December 31, 2003. The increase in general and administrative expenses was
attributable to expenditures associated with Sarbanes-Oxley compliance ($1.6
million) and approximately $1.1 million of legal fees associated with the
MacDonald litigation. The MacDonald litigation was settled with no cash being
exchanged during the year ended December 31, 2004. Also contributing to the
increase was approximately $6.9 million of additional bonus expense associated
with the improved 2004 operating results versus 2003.
Amortization. Amortization expense decreased approximately $3.4 million to
$18.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, from $21.6 million for the
year ended December 31, 2003. For the three months ended September 30, 2003,
there were costs of approximately $550 thousand relating to an adjustment to the
purchase accounting for the LongMiller acquisition. The remaining decline is
based on the timing of scheduled amortization of our inforce revenue streams
purchased in acquisitions.
Other operating expenses. The year ended December 31, 2003 results included
a $1.5 million favorable settlement of litigation that reduced operating
expenses.
Human Capital Practice reorganization. In the fourth quarter of 2003, we
reorganized our executive compensation consulting practices. As part of the
reorganization, some of the operations and employees of the Human Capital
Practice were transferred to the Pearl Meyer & Partners practice. In addition,
several partners and staff members were terminated which resulted in exiting
certain activities of the Human Capital Practice and creating unused leased
office space in numerous cities. We recorded a charge of $7.5 million in the
fourth quarter of 2003 relating to the reorganization, of which $3.3 million
remains on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2004. During the
year ended December 31, 2004, we recorded net decreases to expense of
approximately $200 thousand.
Other income (expense). Other income (expense) for the year ended December
31, 2004, includes a $1.5 million write-off of costs associated with a
prospective securitization financing that was terminated in 2004.
Interest expense. Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2004 was
$22.3 million compared to $24.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2003.
The decrease relates to lower borrowing levels in 2004 compared to 2003.
Income taxes. Income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2004 were $11.2
million, an effective tax rate of 38.2%, compared to $8.1 million, an effective
tax rate of 38.9%, for the year ended December 31, 2003. There were net
adjustments of approximately $380 thousand reducing income tax expense for the
year ended December 31, 2004 reflecting favorable revisions to our state income
tax rate as a result of implementation of several strategies aimed at reducing
state taxes.
Net income. Net income for the year ended December 31, 2004 was $18.2
million, or $0.97 per diluted common share, versus net income of $12.7 million,
or $0.68 per diluted share, for the same period last year.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002
Revenue. Total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $325.9
million compared to $278.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. First
year revenues (which includes consulting and reimbursable expense revenue)
increased $3.2 million, or 2.0%, in 2003 compared to 2002. Renewal and other
recurring revenues were $159.1 million in 2003, up $44.1 million, or 38.4%, from
2002, reflecting a full year of renewals from the November 2002 LongMiller
acquisition. First year commission revenue for 2003 included $3.5 million
related to supplemental compensation arrangements with two of our insurance
carriers in which we received additional payments and revenue based on the cash
value of our existing inforce revenue with these carriers. First year commission
revenue in 2002 included $3.1 million related to an agreement with another
insurance carrier, which was executed in 2002.
Commission and fee expense. Commission and fee expense was $88.6 million,
or 27.2% of total revenue, for the year ended December 31, 2003, versus $90.3
million, or 32.4% of total revenue, for the year ended December 31, 2002. The
reduction in commission expense as a percentage of revenue reflects an increase
in the percentage of revenue generated from employee consultants. Additionally,
a higher percentage of 2003 revenue was renewal revenues (48.8%) as compared to
2002 (41.3%). Generally, renewal revenues have a lower commission rate than
first year revenues. We do not pay commission, or any other related expenses, on
the revenue associated with the supplemental compensation arrangements.
24
General and administrative expense. General and administrative expense for
the year ended December 31, 2003 was $158.9 million, or 48.8% of total revenue,
compared to $140.3 million, or 50.4% of total revenue, for the year ended
December 31, 2002. General and administrative expenses increased for the year
ended December 31, 2003 from the prior year as a result of a full year of
expense from the 2002 acquisitions, such as LongMiller and Federal Policy Group,
and the May 2002 hiring of former Arthur Andersen Human Capital Practice
partners and employees, included for the entire year of 2003. General and
administrative expense for the year ended December 31, 2003 included
approximately $2.6 million in charges, primarily related to severance costs and
lease terminations in our Executive Benefits Practice and Healthcare Group, and
approximately $1.3 million relating to the corporate re-branding effort as a
result of our name change. General and administrative expenses increase as we
add more employees as opposed to independent producers.
Amortization. Amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2003 was
$21.6 million compared to $9.2 million in the prior year period. We acquired
approximately $400 million of inforce revenue with our November 2002 acquisition
of LongMiller. The acquisition of LongMiller added approximately $14.0 million
of amortization expense in 2003 as a result of a full year of amortization of
the net present value of inforce revenue and non-compete agreements. The 2002
results included one month of amortization related to this intangible asset.
Settlement of litigation. During the year ended December 31, 2003, we
received $1.5 million from a favorable lawsuit settlement.
Human Capital Practice reorganization. In the fourth quarter of 2003, we
reorganized our executive compensation consulting practices. As part of the
reorganization, some of the operations and employees of the Human Capital
Practice were transferred to the Pearl Meyer & Partners practice. In addition,
several partners and staff members were terminated which resulted in exiting
certain activities of the Human Capital Practice and creating unused leased
office space in numerous cities. We recorded a charge of $7.5 million in the
fourth quarter of 2003 relating to the reorganization, of which $7.1 million
remained on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2003. No similar
costs were recorded in 2002.
Interest expense. Interest expense for the year December 31, 2003 was $24.3
million compared to $4.1 million in 2002. To finance the November 2002
acquisition of LongMiller, we borrowed approximately $87.5 million on our line
of credit and issued $305 million of non-recourse insurance revenue asset-backed
notes. The increased outstanding borrowings were responsible for the increase in
interest expense.
Income taxes. Income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2003 were $8.1
million, an effective tax rate of 38.9%, compared to $12.4 million, an effective
tax rate of 41.0%, for the year ended December 31, 2002. The effective tax rate
for the year ended December 31, 2003 reflects $283 thousand of net state tax
refunds relating to prior years. The 2003 decrease in the effective tax rate is
primarily related to the true up of the estimated 2002 state tax liability.
Net income. Net income, for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $12.7
million, or $0.68 per diluted common share, versus net income of $17.3 million
after an impairment charge of $523 thousand, net of taxes, from the adoption of
SFAS No. 142, or $0.99 per diluted share, for the same period in the prior year.
The diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding increased to 18.7
million shares for the year ended December 31, 2003 from 17.5 million shares for
the year ended December 31, 2002.
ACQUISITION STRATEGY
Our acquisition criteria focuses on the quality of management, future
earnings, and the strategic fit with our company, as well as the growth
potential of the target company. In several of our acquisitions, we also acquire
the financial value embedded in a book of recurring renewal business that is
expected to be realized for many years after the acquisition takes place.
Historically, our future renewal revenue stream has been the source of
collateral for our line of credit, which we frequently use for acquisitions. As
we acquire more businesses that do not have this attribute, this may limit our
future borrowing availability. We typically structure a majority of the purchase
price in cash. We acquire little in the way of tangible assets, thus creating a
substantial amount of intangible assets on our balance sheet. The companies we
acquire are frequently privately owned and structured as subchapter S
corporations and the acquisitions are usually effected through a purchase of
assets with the income taxed directly to the stockholders of the target.
From time to time we are involved in negotiations relating to the
acquisition of companies in our industry or related industries. Some of these
negotiations could involve companies whose acquisition would be highly material
to our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, we could
incur substantial costs in connection with negotiating such transactions, even
if the transactions are not completed.
25
HUMAN CAPITAL PRACTICE REORGANIZATION
In the fourth quarter of 2003, we reorganized our executive compensation
consulting practices. As part of the reorganization, some of the operations and
employees of the Human Capital Practice were transferred to the Pearl Meyer &
Partners Practice. In addition, four partners and six staff members were
terminated which resulted in exiting certain activities of the practice and
creating unused leased office space in numerous cities. We recorded a charge of
$7.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2003 relating to the reorganization of
which $3.3 million remains on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31,
2004.
As a result of the restructuring, we leveraged the Pearl Meyer & Partners
brand name for executive compensation consulting, eliminated confusion in the
marketplace regarding our practices and their markets, and significantly lowered
the cost structure for the remaining Human Capital Practice. The remaining
business of the Human Capital Practice in 2004 consisted of actuarial/retirement
plan and investment advisory services. Effective January 1, 2005, the Human
Capital Practice was merged into the Executive Benefits Practice.
SUPPLEMENTAL COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS
During the first quarter of 2004, we completed agreements with two of our
insurance carriers, which will generate additional revenue on our existing
blocks of business and future business. The length of one of the contracts is
three years and the other contract is one year. The agreements resulted in
revenue of approximately $900 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2004. The
two new agreements provide for revenue of approximately $175 thousand per
quarter and include a variable element tied to our quarterly sales of the
carrier's products. Future payment amounts would be negatively impacted by
potential future surrenders of the inforce business or non-renewal of the
agreements and positively impacted by asset growth of these contracts.
During the third quarter of 2003, we completed agreements with two of our
core insurance carriers, which will generate additional revenue on our existing
blocks of business with these carriers. The length of one of the contracts is
five and one half years and the other contract is one year. The contracts
automatically renew each year unless notice is given by one of the parties. The
agreements resulted in revenue of $4.1 million and $3.5 million for the years
ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and provide for additional
payments upon certain conditions and measurement dates. The future payment
amounts are based on the cash value (or fair value) of our existing inforce
business with these carriers at specified dates of measurement. Future payment
amounts would be negatively impacted by potential future surrenders of the
inforce business or non-renewal of the agreements and positively impacted by
asset growth of these contracts.
On September 25, 2002, we entered into an Administrative Services Agreement
and Bonus Forfeiture Agreement with an affiliate of AUSA Holding, Inc., one of
our principal stockholders and insurance carrier. We received approximately $2.4
million and $2.5 million of payments in 2004 and 2003, respectively related to
this agreement. During 2002, we received $2.5 million for services rendered
prior to and through September 30, 2002 and recognized a total of $3.1 million
of revenue in 2002, pursuant to this agreement. Under the terms of this
agreement, we expect to continue to receive approximately $2.5 million annually
from the carrier for a period of 30 years, depending upon certain conditions. Of
this annual amount $2.0 million is included in the cash flows securitizing the
asset-backed notes issued to finance the acquisition of LongMiller, and we will
not have access to this cash for general corporate purposes until the
securitized notes are fully paid. This revenue, net of amounts provided for
chargebacks, is being recognized on a monthly basis. The amounts received are
subject to chargeback (reimbursement of a portion of amounts received) if any
policies under this agreement are surrendered or exchanged. Any chargeback
amounts would be deducted from the next scheduled payment.
SEGMENT RESULTS
The following analysis depicts the results of each of our operating
segments on a stand-alone basis. The practices are allocated a charge to cover
centralized Resource Center expenditures in the areas of human resources,
marketing, and information technology.
26
Executive Benefits Practice
OPERATING RESULTS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------
2004 2003 2002
---- ---- ----
TOTAL REVENUE........................... $72,903 $69,988 $82,847
OPERATING EXPENSES
Commissions and fees.................. 28,320 29,281 40,615
Other operating expenses.............. 37,037 38,091 38,549
------- ------- -------
OPERATING INCOME........................ $ 7,546 $ 2,616 $ 3,683
% of revenue........................... 10.4% 3.7% 4.4%
======= ======= =======
Total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2004 was $72.9 million
compared to $70.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. First year
revenue for the year ended December 31, 2004, was $26.2 million compared to
$21.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. First year 2004 revenue for
the year ended December 31, 2004 included $8.6 million for one large case.
Renewal revenue for the year ended December 31, 2004, was $46.5 million compared
to $48.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. The increase in first
year revenues was partially offset by decreases in renewal revenues relating to
the loss of three large clients ($2.3 million) and over funding of certain
corporate plans. Commission expense as a percentage of total revenue declined to
38.8% for the year ended December 31, 2004, from 41.8% for the year ended
December 31, 2003, due to the mix of sales by employee consultants who are paid
a lower commission and the mix between first year versus renewal revenue.
General and administrative expense for the year ended December 31, 2004, was
lower than the year ended December 31, 2003, due mainly to lower headcount (234
for 2004 and 250 for 2003) and facility costs despite a charge of approximately
$1.1 million for legal costs associated with the MacDonald settlement in June of
2004.
First year revenue for the year ended December 31, 2003 was approximately
$7.9 million lower than for the year ended December 31, 2002, in the Executive
Benefits Practice, reflecting the continued difficult economic and legislative
environment, which most directly affects this segment of the business. First
year revenue for the year ended December 31, 2003, includes approximately $785
thousand from the execution of a supplemental compensation arrangement with one
of our insurance carriers. Renewal revenue also declined approximately $5.0
million from the year ended December 31, 2002, as a result of split dollar
legislation and lower deferrals into executive benefit plans. Commission expense
as a percentage of total revenue declined from 49.0% for the year ended December
31, 2002, to 41.8% for the year ended December 31, 2003, due to the higher
percentage of sales by employees who are paid on a lower commission grid.
General and administrative expense for the year ended December 31, 2003,
includes approximately $800 thousand of restructuring charges recorded for the
ongoing consolidation of the business support services and $711 thousand of
charges associated with other severance agreements and lease terminations.
Banking Practice
OPERATING RESULTS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------
2004 2003 2002
---- ---- ----
TOTAL REVENUE........................... $145,249 $165,839 $116,036
OPERATING EXPENSES
Commissions and fees.................. 40,969 55,016 45,322
Other operating expenses.............. 57,177 55,602 33,561
-------- -------- --------
OPERATING INCOME........................ $ 47,103 $ 55,221 $ 37,153
% of revenue........................... 32.4% 33.3% 32.0%
======== ======== ========
Total revenue decreased 12.4% to $145.2 million for the year ended December
31, 2004, from $165.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. First year
revenues for the year ended December 31, 2004 were impacted by a soft market for
BOLI products, interest rates, and sales force changes that occurred in the
second quarter of 2004. Total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2004 and
2003 included approximately $6.6 million and $4.7 million, respectively, related
to supplemental compensation arrangements. Renewal revenue for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, was $98.4 million and $99.5 million,
respectively. Commission expense for the year ended December 31, 2004, was $41.0
million, or 28.2% of revenue, compared to $55.0 million, or 33.2% of revenue,
for the same period in 2003. The commission expense as a percentage of revenue
continues to decrease as a result of a higher percentage of first year revenue
produced by employee consultants versus independent producers and the mix
between first year revenues and renewal revenues. In addition, we do not pay
commission expense on the
27
revenue associated with the supplemental compensation arrangements. In the
second half of 2003, Banking Practice acquired two of its former independent
producer organizations. General and administrative expense for the year ended
December 31, 2004, was $44.9 million, or 30.9% of revenue, compared to $40.4
million, or 24.3% of revenue, for the comparable period in 2003. We terminated
seventeen of our Banking Practice employees, representing roughly 6% of the
Practice's employees, or 2% of our employees in September of 2004. The actions
resulted in $230 thousand of severance costs and are expected to result in
annual operating expense savings of approximately $1.5 million. The higher
percentage of general and administrative expenses to revenue reflects increased
operating expenses relating to former independent producers and the lower
revenue base. Amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2004 and
2003, was $12.3 million and $15.2 million, respectively. The decrease is based
on the timing of scheduled amortization of our inforce revenue and a $550
thousand adjustment to the purchase accounting for the LongMiller acquisition in
the third quarter of 2003.
Total first year revenue increased 3.1% to $66.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003 from $64.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2002.
Revenue in 2003 from the large bank sector of the business declined
significantly from 2002 due to the sustained low interest rate environment.
Increases in the community bank sector more than offset the first year revenue
decrease in the large bank sector. Renewal revenue for the year ended December
31, 2003 includes $2.0 million related to the Administrative Services Agreement
entered into on September 25, 2002 with an affiliate of AUSA Holding, Inc along
with $2.7 million in first year revenue from the execution of supplemental
compensation arrangements with two other insurance carriers during 2003.
Approximately $40.0 million of the 2003 increase in renewal revenue is
attributable to the securitized inforce revenue stream from the acquisition of
LongMiller. Commission expense for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $55.0
million, or 33.2% of revenue, compared to $45.3 million, or 39.1% of revenue, in
the same period in 2002. The commission expense as a percentage of revenue
continues to decrease as a result of a higher percentage of first year revenue
produced by employees. In addition, a larger percentage of total revenue
consisted of renewal revenue, which has a lower commission expense percentage.
We do not pay commission expense on the revenue associated with the supplemental
compensation arrangements. General and administrative expense for the year ended
December 31, 2003, was $40.2 million, or 24.2% of revenue, compared to $30.8
million, or 26.6% of revenue, for the comparable period in 2002. 2003 expenses
included twelve months for the LongMiller operation compared to one month in
2002, and operating expenses for the fourth quarter 2003 acquisition of
Shoemaker and Blackwood. The lower percentage of general and administrative
expenses to revenue reflects the relatively lower costs associated with the
revenue stream from the LongMiller acquisition.
Healthcare Group
OPERATING RESULTS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------
2004 2003 2002
---- ---- ----
TOTAL REVENUE........................ $35,684 $36,100 $37,906
OPERATING EXPENSES
Commissions and fees............... 4,073 4,193 4,061
Other operating expenses........... 27,197 27,060 29,027
------- ------- -------
OPERATING INCOME .................... $ 4,414 $ 4,847 $ 4,818
% of revenue........................ 12.4% 13.4% 12.7%
======= ======= =======
Healthcare Group revenues were slightly lower (1.2%) for the year ended
December 31, 2004, compared to the prior year. First year commission revenue for
the year ended December 31, 2004, was lower by $3.3 million than the prior year
due to a lower number of new implementation projects and lower add-on
commissions as a result of split dollar regulations and clients electing to
split consulting engagements from the company who sells the funding solution.
However, consulting revenue (included in first year revenue) increased over the
prior year by $1.7 million due to growth in several services. Renewal revenue
for the year ended December 31, 2004 was approximately $10.4 million compared to
$9.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. General and administrative
expenses remained flat due to cost containment efforts.
Healthcare Group revenues were slightly lower (4.8%) for the year ended
December 31, 2003, compared to the prior year. Healthcare's 2002 performance was
strong and the 2003 healthcare environment was challenging especially for
revenues in the areas of labor services, rank and file compensation, and
physician services. For the year ended December 31, 2003, commission and general
and administrative expenses include approximately $435 thousand and $335
thousand, respectively, for costs associated with a severance agreement. General
and administrative expense for the year ended December 31, 2002, included one
time charges of $729 thousand for write off of leasehold improvements from a
previous office space and severance associated with the downsizing of existing
staff levels.
28
Pearl Meyer & Partners
OPERATING RESULTS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------
2004 2003 2002
---- ---- ----
TOTAL REVENUE.................... $33,111 $26,871 $22,333
OPERATING EXPENSES............... 27,682 25,773 22,449
------- ------- --------
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS).......... $ 5,429 $ 1,098 ($ 116)
% of revenue.................... 16.4% 4.1% (0.5%)
======= ======= ========
As of October 1, 2003, we transferred part of the operations of the Human
Capital Practice to Pearl Meyer & Partners. As a result, all years presented
have been reclassified to reflect this transfer. Executive compensation
consulting services have seen an increase in demand over 2003, as companies and
compensation committees increase their focus on executive compensation.
Total consulting revenue increased 23.2% to $33.1 million for the year
ended December 31, 2004, compared to $26.9 million for the year ended December
31, 2003. The practice continues to experience more sales activity as a result
of additional engagements in its areas of expertise of corporate governance and
executive compensation due, in part, to increased public scrutiny of these
areas. General and administrative expense was $27.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004, compared to $25.8 million for the year ended December 31,
2003 reflecting higher headcount (97 in 2004 and 83 in 2003).
Total consulting revenue increased 20.3% to $26.9 million for the year
ended December 31, 2003, compared to $22.3 million for the year ended December
31, 2002. The practice continues to experience more sales activity as a result
of additional engagements in its areas of expertise of corporate governance and
executive compensation due, in part, to increased public scrutiny of these
areas. General and administrative expense was $23.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003, compared to $20.9 million for the year ended December 31,
2002 reflecting higher headcount (83 in 2003 and 37 in 2002).
Human Capital Practice
OPERATING RESULTS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------
2004 2003 2002
---- ---- ----
TOTAL REVENUE..................... $8,574 $ 8,540 $ 5,043
OPERATING EXPENSES
Commissions and fees............ 930 125 -
Other operating expenses........ 7,861 19,773 10,464
------- -------- --------
OPERATING LOSS.................... ($ 217) ($11,358) ($ 5,421)
% of revenue..................... (2.5%) (133.0%) (107.5%)
======= ======== ========
The Human Capital Practice was formed by combining our existing Rewards and
Performance Group with 10 partners and 74 employees from Arthur Andersen's Human
Capital Practice in May 2002. The Human Capital Practice results have been
negatively affected by the inability of the former Andersen employees to retain
their Andersen client base or develop and sell into new relationships.
In the fourth quarter of 2003, we reorganized our executive compensation
consulting practices. As part of the reorganization, some of the operations and
employees of the Human Capital Practice (including the Rewards and Performance
Group) were transferred to the Pearl Meyer & Partners practice. As a result, all
periods presented have been reclassified to reflect this transfer. The Human
Capital Practice exited certain revenue producing activities in connection with
the fourth quarter 2003 reorganization. We recorded a charge of approximately
$7.5 million in the fourth quarter 2003 relating to the reorganization of which
$3.3 million remains on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2004.
Significant reductions in operating expenses in 2004 versus 2003 were
achieved based on the reorganization in the fourth quarter of 2003. Headcount at
December 31, 2004 was 38 compared to 50 at December 31, 2003 and 109 at December
31, 2002. Rent and facility costs were significantly lower for the year ended
December 31, 2004 compared to the year ended December 31, 2003 based on the
vacated facilities as part of the fourth quarter 2003 reorganization.
29
Revenues and operating expenses were lower in 2002 than in 2003 due to HCP
only operating for 6 1/2 months in 2002 versus 12 months in 2003.
Effective January 1, 2005, the Human Capital Practice was merged into the
Executive Benefits Practice.
Federal Policy Group
OPERATING RESULTS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------------
2004 2003 2002
---- ---- ----
TOTAL REVENUE............. $15,707 $14,855 $9,520
OPERATING EXPENSES........ 11,026 8,257 5,426
------- ------- ------
OPERATING INCOME.......... $ 4,681 $ 6,598 $4,094
% of revenue............. 29.8% 44.4% 43.0%
======= ======= ======
Federal Policy Group was acquired on February 25, 2002. Federal Policy
Group is a consulting practice representing Fortune 500 companies, trade
associations, and other businesses before Congress, the Treasury Department, and
other federal agencies on legislative and regulatory matters. Results for the
years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, included approximately $3.0 million of
revenue from success fees. Results for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003
included approximately $2.6 million and $1.6 million of revenue and
approximately $551 thousand and $265 thousand of operating income, respectively,
related to four employees hired during the second quarter of 2003. Results for
the year ended December 31, 2002 represented 10 months of activity.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Selected Measures of Liquidity and Capital Resources.
AS OF DECEMBER 31,
------------------
2004 2003
------- ------
Cash and cash equivalents.................. $23,199 $3,156
Working capital (1) ....................... $ 9,087 $2,623
Current ratio -- to one.................... 1.12 1.04
Stockholders' equity per common share (2).. $ 14.92 $13.95
Debt to total capitalization (3) .......... 54.2% 57.7%
- --------------
(1) Includes restricted cash and current portion of debt associated with
asset-backed notes.
(2) Total stockholders' equity divided by actual shares outstanding at
year-end.
(3) Current debt plus long-term debt divided by current debt plus long-term
debt plus stockholders' equity
In addition to our tangible balance sheet assets and liabilities, we have
an on-going non-securitized renewal revenue stream, estimated to be $790.6
million, on a gross basis, over the next ten years. This on-going renewal
revenue stream reflects current conditions and is not necessarily indicative of
the revenue that may actually be achieved in the future and we cannot assure you
that commissions under these policies will be received. See "Estimated Future
Gross Renewal Revenue" section in the next few pages.
Based on our historically strong operating cash flow and revolving credit
facility, we believe we have little need to maintain substantial cash balances.
We use net cash from operating activities primarily to fund capital
expenditures, small acquisitions, and service existing debt. We expect large
cash outlays and future acquisitions will be financed primarily through
externally available funds. However, we can offer no assurance such funds will
be available and, if so, on terms acceptable to us.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------------------
2004 2003 2002
---- ---- ----
Cash flows from (used in):
Operating activities........ $61,183 $74,613 $ 21,520
Investing activities........ (13,992) (13,585) (371,005)
Financing activities........ (27,148) (72,138) 353,544
30
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Our cash flow from operating activities for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002 were as follows:
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------
2004 2003 2002
---- ---- ----
Net income plus non-cash expenses.............. $53,889 $47,011 $33,874
Changes in operating assets and liabilities.... 7,294 27,602 (12,354)
------- ------- -------
Cash flow from operating activities............ $61,183 $74,613 $21,520
======= ======= =======
The non-cash expenses mentioned above include depreciation of equipment and
leasehold improvements, amortization of intangibles, charges for
performance-based stock options issued to non-employee producers, and deferred
tax expense. In the first quarter of 2004, we wrote off approximately $1.5
million of costs associated with a securitization financing that we are no
longer pursuing. Cash provided by changes in operating assets and liabilities
included a reduction of accounts receivable ($3.1 million), primarily as a
result of improved collection efforts, and an increase in non-current
liabilities primarily as a result of increased contributions and earnings in our
deferred compensation plans ($3.6 million).
Estimated Future Gross Renewal Revenue
The following tables represent the estimated gross renewal revenue
associated with the business-owned life insurance policies owned by our clients
as of December 31, 2004. The projected gross revenues are not adjusted for
mortality, lapse, or other factors that may impair realization, have not been
discounted to reflect their net present value, and do not reflect the commission
expense we must pay to consultants when we recognize the related revenue. We
cannot assure you that commissions under these policies will be received. These
projected gross revenues are based on the beliefs and assumptions of management
and are not necessarily indicative of the revenue that may actually be realized
in the future.
Non-securitized Gross Inforce Revenues. The following table represents the
estimated gross inforce revenue associated with business-owned life insurance
policies owned by our clients as of December 31, 2004, not including estimated
securitized inforce revenues, which are set forth in a separate table.
EXECUTIVE BANKING HEALTHCARE
BENEFITS PRACTICE PRACTICE GROUP TOTAL
---------------------- --------------- -------------- ---------------
2005 $ 43,739 $ 46,873 $ 5,626 $ 96,238
2006 38,038 45,286 5,419 88,743
2007 34,529 43,767 5,187 83,483
2008 28,874 43,879 4,733 77,486
2009 27,692 42,607 4,254 74,553
2010 25,315 43,758 3,837 72,910
2011 24,096 45,300 3,360 72,756
2012 24,030 46,676 2,726 73,432
2013 24,590 48,147 2,027 74,764
2014 24,842 49,905 1,525 76,272
-------- -------- ------- --------
Total December 31, 2004 $295,745 $456,198 $38,694 $790,637
======== ======== ======= ========
Total December 31, 2003 $346,978 $433,294 $38,146 $818,418
======== ======== ======= ========
The 10-year inforce revenues net of commission expense are $628.1 million
as of December 31, 2004, as compared to $612.6 at December 31, 2003.
31
Securitized Gross Inforce Revenues. The following table represents the
estimated gross renewal revenue associated with our securitized inforce
bank-owned life insurance policies as of December 31, 2004. These revenue
streams are restricted for the specific purpose of paying off our asset-backed
notes which were issued in connection with the acquisition of LongMiller in
November 2002.
BANKING PRACTICE
----------------
2005..................... $ 45,388
2006..................... 47,407
2007..................... 50,170
2008..................... 52,892
2009..................... 54,846
2010..................... 56,983
2011..................... 58,579
2012..................... 60,908
2013..................... 63,591
2014..................... 66,146
--------
Total December 31, 2004 $556,910
========
Total December 31, 2003 $572,020
========
The 10-year inforce revenue net of commission expense is $403.0 million and
$438.0 million, as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Pearl Meyer & Partners, Human Capital Practice, and Federal Policy Group
generate fee-based revenues and do not produce inforce revenues.
Cash Used in Investing Activities
During the year ended December 31, 2004, $9.2 million of our cash was used
for contingent consideration payments to prior owners of businesses we acquired
and $4.8 million of our cash was used for purchases of equipment.
A substantial portion of the purchase price used to fund acquisitions has
historically been paid in cash. This is primarily due to our desire to avoid
diluting our existing stockholders. We expect acquisitions to continue and be
financed primarily from available credit lines and possible additional equity.
However, we can offer no assurances such will be the case.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
For the year ended December 31, 2004, approximately $27.1 million of cash
was used primarily ($28.0 million) for the net repayment of borrowings.
As of December 31, 2004, there was restricted cash of approximately $12.0
million, a decrease of $6.9 million from December 31, 2003, which will be used
to pay down the asset-backed notes issued to finance the acquisition of
LongMiller. This cash is not available for general corporate purposes, but is
solely to service securitization indebtedness incurred to finance the
acquisition of LongMiller.
In May 2004, we received proceeds of approximately $17.5 million from our
participation in a pooled trust preferred transaction, in which we issued $18.0
million aggregate principal amount of long-term subordinated debt securities
with a floating rate based on three month LIBOR plus a spread of 380 basis
points (5.96% as of December 31, 2004). We used the net proceeds to pay down the
term portion of our credit facility. The pooled trust preferred debt is payable
in one payment due in 30 years with interest paid quarterly.
In November 2003, we amended and restated our December 28, 1999 Credit
Agreement revising the amount available under the credit facility to $80.0
million for a three year period ending December 31, 2006. In December 2003, a
new participant bank was added to the facility increasing the facility amount to
$90 million. The credit facility amount was reduced dollar for dollar by $18.0
million of repayments in 2003 and 2004 on the term portion of the facility. We
had $72.0 million available under our credit line at December 31, 2004. Our
assets are pledged to the bank group as part of the credit facility
32
except for cash flows from commissions to be received upon the renewals of
specified inforce policies acquired in connection with the acquisition of
LongMiller. In September 2004, we amended our credit agreement to allow for
potential stock repurchases and dividend payments. The remaining provisions of
the agreement remained substantively the same.
The restrictive covenants under the credit agreement provide for the
maintenance of a minimum ratio of fixed charges, a maximum allowable leverage
ratio, a minimum amount of net worth (stockholders' equity), and a maximum ratio
of debt to capitalization. We were in compliance with all restrictive covenants
as of December 31, 2004.
We believe that our cash flow from operating activities will continue to
provide sufficient funds to service our debt obligations. However, as our
business grows, our working capital and capital expenditure requirements will
also continue to increase. There can be no assurance that the net cash flow from
operations will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash flow requirements or
that we will not require additional debt or equity financing in the future. We
may issue stock to finance future acquisitions.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS AND OTHER CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
We do not have any material off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or
are reasonably likely to have, a current or future effect on our financial
condition, changes in financial condition, revenue or expenses, results of
operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources. Set forth
below is a summary presentation of our contractual obligations as of December
31, 2004, which are expected to become due and payable during the periods
specified.
PAYMENTS DUE BY PERIOD
LESS THAN MORE THAN
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS TOTAL 1 YEAR 1-3 YEARS 3-5 YEARS 5 YEARS
----------------------- ----- ------ --------- --------- -------
Debt obligations............................... $324,549 $14,927 $20,291 $26,689 $262,642
Operating lease obligations.................... 43,282 8,773 15,029 11,243 8,237
Contingent considerations for acquisitions..... 18,296 10,093 8,203 - -
-------- ------- ------- ------- --------
Total $386,127 $33,793 $43,523 $37,932 $270,879
======== ======= ======= ======= ========
We expect to make significant cash outlays in future years for interest,
taxes, and deferred compensation arrangements. However, due to their variable
nature, no amounts for these items have been included in the table above.
INFLATION
Inflation has not had a material effect on our results of operations.
Certain of our expenses, such as compensation, benefits, and capital equipment
costs, are subject to normal inflationary pressures. However, the majority of
our service and administrative agreements with clients, which generate fee
income, have a cost of living adjustment tied to the consumer price index.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
At December 31, 2004, we had total outstanding indebtedness of $324.5
million, or approximately 113.8% of total market capitalization. Of our
outstanding debt, $274.8 million was subject to an average fixed rate of 6.4% at
December 31, 2004. Of our outstanding debt, $4.7 million was subject to fixed
rates of 10.0% at December 31, 2004. The amount outstanding on our three pooled
trust preferred debt issues is $45.0 million as of December 31, 2004 (average
interest rate of 6.2% as of December 31, 2004).
On May 14, 2004, we entered into an interest rate swap with a total
non-amortizing notional value of $7 million to hedge our LIBOR-based debt. The
notional amount of the interest rate swap entered into in January of 2003
amortizes at the rate of $1.4 million per quarter. The terms of the interest
rate swaps are as follows:
NOTIONAL AMOUNT
EFFECTIVE AT DECEMBER 31, FIXED RATE VARIABLE RATE FAIR VALUE AS OF
DATE MATURITY DATE 2004 TO BE PAID TO BE RECEIVED DECEMBER 31, 2004
---- ------------- ---- ---------- -------------- -----------------
January 7, 2003 December 31, 2007 $16,800 2.85% LIBOR $132
May 18, 2004 March 31, 2009 $ 7,000 4.44% LIBOR ($172)
-----
TOTAL ($ 40)
=====
33
We have exposure to changing interest rates and, as discussed in Note 16,
"Financial Instruments" to the consolidated financial statements, will engage in
hedging activities, from time to time, to mitigate this risk. The interest rate
swaps, which we have entered into, are used to hedge our interest rate exposure
on the LIBOR based variable rate debt outstanding at December 31, 2004. Interest
on the remaining $21.2 million of unhedged debt at December 31, 2004, bears
interest at three-month LIBOR plus a weighted average of 400 basis points. At
our current borrowing level, a 1% change in the interest rate will have an
effect of approximately $212 thousand on interest expense on an annual basis.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Our financial statements are included under Part IV of this Form 10-K.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
CONCLUSION REGARDING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management,
including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, we conducted
an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined
under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, our chief executive
officer and our chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls
and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this annual
report.
MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate
internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer,
we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control - Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control -
Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over
financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2004. We reviewed the
results of management's assessment with the Audit Committee of our Board of
Directors.
Management's assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 has been audited by Deloitte and
Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their
attestation report concurring with management's assessment, which is included
below.
March 2, 2005
34
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Clark, Inc.
North Barrington, Illinois
We have audited management's assessment, included in the accompanying
Management's Report on Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting, that Clark,
Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") maintained effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in
Internal Control--Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company's management is
responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's
assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control
over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective
internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over
financial reporting, evaluating management's assessment, testing and evaluating
the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such
other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by,
or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal
financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the
company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to
the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2)
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to
permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of
the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's
assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial
reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management
override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be
prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of
the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future
periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, management's assessment that the Company maintained effective
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, is fairly
stated, in all material respects, based on the criteria established in Internal
Control--Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Also in our opinion, the Company
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on the criteria established in Internal
Control--Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial
statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004 of the Company and our
report dated March 2, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial
statements.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Chicago, Illinois
March 2, 2005
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
35
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The information required by Item 10 regarding directors is incorporated by
reference from the information under the captions "Election of Directors" and
"Continuing Directors" in our definitive Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual
Meeting of the Stockholders (the "Proxy Statement"). The information required by
Item 10 regarding audit committee and audit committee financial expert
disclosures are incorporated by reference from the information under the caption
"Committees-Composition and Meetings of the Board of Directors-Audit Committee"
in the Proxy Statement under the caption "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership
Reporting Compliance." Disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K will be contained in the Proxy Statement. The information
required by Item 10 regarding executive officers will be contained in the Proxy
Statement under the caption "Our Executive Officers."
We have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics, entitled "Clark
Consulting Code of Ethics and Business Conduct" (the "Code of Ethics") as
required by the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange and the rules
of the SEC. This Code applies to all of our directors, officers, and employees.
We have also adopted a corporate governance policy (the "Governance Policy") and
a charter for each of our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and our
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (collectively, the "Committee
Charters"). We have posted the Code of Ethics, the Governance Policy, and each
of the Committee Charters on our website at www.clarkconsulting.com under
"corporate governance" in the "investors" section of our website. We will post
on our website any amendments to, or waivers from, our Code of Ethics applicable
to any of our directors or executive officers. The foregoing information will
also be available in print to any stockholder who requests such information.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by Item 11 is hereby incorporated by reference
from our 2005 proxy statement under the captions "Summary Compensation Table,"
"Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year," "Aggregated Option Exercises and Year-End
Values," "Compensation of Directors," "Executive Officer Employment Agreements,"
"Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation," "Report of the
Compensation Committee" and "Performance Graph."
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information required by Item 12 is hereby incorporated by reference
from our 2005 proxy statement under the caption "Ownership of Common Stock by
Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" and under the caption "Equity
Compensation Plan Information."
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information required by Item 13 is hereby incorporated by reference
from our 2005 proxy statement under the caption "Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions."
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by Item 14 is hereby incorporated by reference from our
2005 proxy statement under the caption "Principal Accounting Firm Fees."
36
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report:
(1) Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2004 and 2003
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003, and 2002
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003, and 2002
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(2) Financial Statement Schedules
None.
Schedules not listed above have been omitted because they are not required,
are not applicable, are shown in the related financial statements or notes
thereto or the amounts are immaterial.
(3) Exhibits
The information required by this Item 15(a)(3) is set forth in the Exhibit
Index immediately following our notes to consolidated financial statements.
The exhibits listed herein will be furnished upon written request to
"Vice-President of Investor Relations" located at our corporate
headquarters and payment of a reasonable fee that will be limited to our
reasonable expense in furnishing such exhibits.
37
CLARK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PAGE
----
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm................................................... 39
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2004 and 2003.............................................. 40
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002................... 41
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002..... 42
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002............... 43
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements................................................................ 44
38
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Clark, Inc.
North Barrington, Illinois
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Clark, Inc. and
subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related
consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each
of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Clark, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Company's
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on the
criteria established in Internal Control--Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report
dated March 2, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion on management's assessment
of the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting
and an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal
control over financial reporting.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Chicago, Illinois
March 2, 2005
39
CLARK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2004 AND 2003
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)
DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------
2004 2003
------------- -----------
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents................................... $ 23,199 $ 3,156
Restricted cash............................................. 12,020 18,966
Accounts and notes receivable, net.......................... 44,388 47,478
Prepaid income taxes........................................ 1,479 2,931
Deferred tax assets......................................... 782 253
Other current assets........................................ 2,445 3,149
-------- --------
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS................................ 84,313 75,933
-------- --------
INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET........................................
Net present value of inforce revenue........................ 439,644 455,495
Goodwill.................................................... 138,768 126,888
Non-compete agreements...................................... 5,834 7,420
-------- --------
TOTAL INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET........................ 584,246 589,803
-------- --------
EQUIPMENT AND LEASEHOLD IMPROVEMENTS, NET .................... 12,140 13,284
CASH SURRENDER VALUE OF LIFE INSURANCE........................ 8,111 4,944
OTHER ASSETS.................................................. 12,483 15,339
-------- --------
TOTAL ASSETS........................................ $701,293 $699,303
======== ========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable............................................ $3,886 $ 8,129
Accrued liabilities......................................... 54,145 46,648
Deferred revenue............................................ 2,268 1,980
Recourse debt maturing within one year...................... 1,295 8,120
Non-recourse debt maturing within one year.................. 13,632 8,433
-------- --------
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES........................... 75,226 73,310
TRUST PREFERRED DEBT.......................................... 45,000 27,000
LONG-TERM RECOURSE DEBT....................................... 3,427 28,672
LONG-TERM NON-RECOURSE DEBT................................... 261,195 280,296
DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES...................................... 24,752 14,057
DEFERRED COMPENSATION......................................... 8,215 6,563
INTEREST RATE SWAP ........................................... 40 157
OTHER NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES................................. 9,252 10,980
-------- --------
TOTAL LIABILITIES................................. 427,107 441,035
-------- --------
CONTINGENCIES AND COMMITMENTS (NOTES 9, 20 AND 24)
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred stock
Authorized -- 1,000,000 shares; $0.01 par value, none issued - -
Common stock
Authorized -- 40,000,000 shares; $0.01 par value issued --
18,921,903 in 2004 and 18,580,374 in 2003................ 188 186
Paid in capital............................................. 193,849 190,876
Retained earnings........................................... 87,803 69,643
Other comprehensive income (loss)........................... (135) (245)
Deferred compensation....................................... 1,898 -
Treasury stock, at cost, 549,171 shares in 2004 and 65,171
shares in 2003........................................... (9,417) (2,192)
-------- --------
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY.................................... 274,186 258,268
-------- --------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY.................... $701,293 $699,303
======== ========
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial
statements.
40
CLARK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004, 2003, AND 2002
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------
2004 2003 2002
----------- ---------- -----------
REVENUE
First year commissions and related fees........... $ 97,472 $ 113,298 $ 123,607
Renewal commissions and related fees.............. 157,480 159,082 114,963
Consulting fees................................... 54,516 47,205 34,973
Reimbursable expenses............................. 6,114 6,344 5,043
---------- ---------- ----------
TOTAL REVENUE....................................... 315,582 325,929 278,586
---------- ---------- ----------
OPERATING EXPENSES
Commissions and fees.............................. 74,292 88,615 90,273
General and administrative........................ 164,278 158,923 140,308
Reimbursable expenses............................. 6,114 6,344 5,043
Amortization...................................... 18,158 21,579 9,249
Settlement of litigation.......................... - (1,500) -
Human Capital Practice reorganization............. (198) 7,490 -
---------- ---------- ----------
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES............................ 262,644 281,451 244,873
---------- ---------- ----------
OPERATING INCOME.................................... 52,938 44,478 33,713
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE), NET......................... (1,499) 302 262
INTEREST, NET.......................................
Income............................................ 262 281 350
Expense........................................... (22,319) (24,290) (4,070)
---------- ---------- ----------
TOTAL INTEREST, NET................................. (22,057) (24,009) (3,720)
---------- ---------- ----------
Income before taxes and cumulative effect of change
in accounting principle........................... 29,382 20,771 30,255
Income taxes........................................ 11,222 8,089 12,404
---------- ---------- ----------
Income before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle, net of tax.................. 18,160 12,682 17,851
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle, net of tax............................. - - (523)
---------- ---------- ----------
NET INCOME.......................................... $ 18,160 $ 12,682 $ 17,328
========== ========== ==========
Basic earnings per common share, before cumulative
effect of change in accounting principle.......... $ 0.98 $ 0.69 $ 1.06
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle. - - (0.03)
---------- ---------- ----------
Basic earnings per common share..................... $ 0.98 $ 0.69 $ 1.03
========== ========== ==========
Weighted average shares outstanding - Basic......... 18,542,232 18,338,963 16,896,657
========== ========== ==========
Diluted earnings per common share, before
cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle ........................................ $ 0.97 $ 0.68 $ 1.02
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle. - - (0.03)
---------- ---------- ----------
Diluted earnings per common share................... $ 0.97 $ 0.68 $ 0.99
========== ========== ==========
Weighted average shares outstanding - Diluted....... 18,805,518 18,740,934 17,513,106
========== ========== ==========
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial
statements.
41
CLARK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004, 2003, AND 2002
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT SHARE AMOUNTS)
COMMON STOCK
-------------------
DEFERRED OTHER TOTAL
PAID IN RETAINED TREASURY COMPENSATION COMPREHENSIVE STOCKHOLDERS'
SHARES AMOUNT CAPITAL EARNINGS STOCK STOCK INCOME(LOSS) EQUITY
------ ------ ------- -------- ----- ----- ------------ ------
Balance at January 1, 2002........... 16,524,070 $165 $157,680 $39,633 ($1,286) $ - $ - $196,192
Issuance of common stock in
connection with acquisitions..... 1,459,413 15 26,518 - - - - 26,533
Non-employee compensation.......... - - 474 - - - - 474
Exercise of stock options -- net
of redemptions and tax effect.... 72,664 1 697 - (73) - - 625
Issuance of stock to directors..... 4,371 - 100 - - - - 100
Net activity related to employee
stock purchase plan.............. - - (130) - - - - (130)
Net income......................... - - - 17,328 - - - 17,328
---------- ---- -------- ------- ------ ------ ----- --------
Balance at December 31, 2002......... 18,060,518 181 185,339 56,961 (1,359) - - 241,122
Issuance of common stock in
connection with acquisitions..... 289,542 3 3,682 - - - - 3,685
Non-employee compensation.......... - - 330 - - - - 330
Exercise of stock options - net of
redemptions and tax effect....... 164,218 2 2,059 - (73) - - 1,988
Issuance of stock to directors..... 925 - 15 - - - - 15
Net activity related to employee
stock purchase plan.............. - - (549) - - - - (549)
Purchase of company stock.......... - - - - (760) - - (760)
Change in value of interest rate
swaps, net of tax................ - - - - - - (245) (245)
Net income......................... - - - 12,682 - - - 12,682
---------- ---- -------- ------- ------ ------ ----- --------
Balance at December 31, 2003......... 18,515,203 186 190,876 69,643 (2,192) - (245) 258,268
Issuance of common stock in
connection with acquisitions..... 62,918 1 1,096 - - - - 1,097
Deferred compensation stock........ 125,111 - - - - 1,898 - 1,898
Exercise of stock options - net of
redemptions and tax effect....... 153,500 1 1,687 - - - - 1,688
Net activity related to employee
stock purchase plan.............. - - 190 - - - - 190
Purchase of company stock.......... (484,000) - - - (7,225) - - (7,225)
Change in value of interest rate
swaps, net of tax................ - - - - - - 110 110
Net income......................... - - - 18,160 - - - 18,160
---------- ---- -------- ------- ------ ------ ----- --------
Balance at December 31, 2004......... 18,372,732 $188 $193,849 $87,803 ($9,417) $1,898 ($135) $274,186
========== ==== ======== ======= ======= ====== ===== ========
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial
statements.
42
CLARK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004, 2003, AND 2002
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------
2004 2003 2002
----------- --------- --------
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income ............................................ $18,160 $ 12,682 $ 17,328
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash
provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization.................. 23,822 27,257 13,600
Write off of securitization financing
costs........................................ 1,503 - -
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle.................................... - - 892
Non-employee stock compensation................ - 345 574
Deferred taxes................................. 10,159 6,131 1,129
Loss on disposal of assets..................... 245 596 351
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
(excluding the effects of acquisitions):
Accounts receivable............................ 3,090 18,002 (7,924)
Other current assets........................... 704 (305) (1,045)
Other assets................................... (1,186) 818 (6,825)
Accounts payable............................... (4,243) (334) 1,723
Income taxes................................... 1,452 322 (6,728)
Tax effect of stock option benefit............. 149 356 24
Accrued liabilities............................ 2,787 (425) 4,262
Deferred income................................ 288 (369) 1,829
Other non-current liabilities.................. 703 6,753 1,152
Deferred compensation.......................... 3,550 2,784 1,178
------- -------- --------
Cash provided by operating activities.................... 61,183 74,613 21,520
------- -------- --------
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of businesses, net of cash acquired (9,227) (9,162) (363,233)
Purchases of equipment................................. (4,765) (4,423) (7,772)
------- -------- --------
Cash used in investing activities........................ (13,992) (13,585) (371,005)
------- -------- --------
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from borrowings............................... 70,210 39,500 385,130
Repayment of borrowings................................ (98,182) (105,692) (10,892)
Debt financing costs................................... (628) (1,413) (5,057)
Cash restricted for the repayment of non-recourse
notes................................................ 6,946 (4,901) (14,065)
Exercise of stock options.............................. 1,540 1,633 601
Purchase of company stock (deferred comp plan)......... - (760) -
Net activity related to employee stock purchase plan... 190 (505) (130)
Repurchase of company stock............................ (7,224) - -
Settlement of interest rate swap....................... - - (2,043)
------- -------- --------
Cash (used in) provided by financing activities (27,148) (72,138) 353,544
------- -------- --------
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS..... 20,043 (11,110) 4,059
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF THE YEAR....... 3,156 14,266 10,207
------- -------- --------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF THE YEAR............. $23,199 $ 3,156 $ 14,266
======= ======== ========
Supplemental Disclosure for Cash Paid during the
Period:
Interest paid......................................... $21,127 $ 21,779 $ 3,638
Income taxes, net of refunds.......................... ($389) $ 1,354 $ 17,636
Supplemental Non-Cash Information:
Fair value of common stock issued in connection
with acquisition contingent payouts................ $ 1,096 $ 3,055 $ 5,289
======= ======== ========
Fair value of common stock issued in connection
with acquisitions................................... $ - $ 630 $ 21,244
======= ======== ========
Asset-backed notes issued to sellers in connection
with acquisition................................... $ - $ - $ 37,350
======= ======== ========
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial
statements.
43
CLARK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004
(TABLES SHOWN IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation -- The consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of Clark, Inc. (the "Company") and its wholly owned subsidiaries.
Through the Company's six operating segments, Executive Benefits Practice,
Banking Practice, Healthcare Group, Pearl Meyer & Partners, Human Capital
Practice, and Federal Policy Group, the Company designs, markets, and
administers compensation and benefit programs for companies supplementing and
securing employee benefits and provides executive compensation and related
consulting services to U.S. corporations, banks, and healthcare organizations.
The Company assists its clients in using customized life insurance products to
finance their long-term benefit liabilities. In addition, the Company owns Clark
Securities, Inc. ("CSI"), a registered broker/dealer through which it sells all
its securities products and receives related commissions. All significant
intercompany amounts and transactions have been eliminated in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements.
Use of Estimates -- The preparation of financial statements in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts
reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. The Company bases
its estimates on historical experience, actuarial and other valuations, and
various other factors that are deemed to be reasonable under the circumstances,
the results of which form the basis for making judgements about the carrying
value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other
sources. Some of these judgements can be subjective and complex and,
consequently, actual results may differ from these estimates under different
assumptions or conditions. While for any given assumption or estimate made by
the Company's management, there may be other assumptions and estimates that are
reasonable, the Company believes that, given the current facts and
circumstances, it is unlikely that applying any other such reasonable estimate
or assumption would materially impact the financial statements. The Company uses
estimates in its determination of allowances for accounts receivable and
chargebacks, restructuring provisions, the net present value and amortization of
inforce revenue acquired through acquisitions and various impairment analyses.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition -- First year commissions and related fees are
recognized as revenue in the amount due or paid by the carrier at the time the
policy application is substantially completed, the initial premium payment is
paid (which is the effective date of the insurance policy), and the insured
party is contractually committed to purchase the insurance policy or, in certain
instances, when cash is received. Fees for program design and placement are
recognized in a manner consistent with commissions. Renewal revenue is
recognized on the date that the renewal premium is due or paid by the client to
the insurance company depending on whether a policy is considered fixed or
variable. Fixed renewal policies have predictable set premium amounts. Revenue
on these policies is recognized on the premium due date. Variable renewal policy
premiums can be based upon such items as value of underlying investments in the
policy, cash surrender value of the policy, or mutual fund values. In some
cases, the Company is able to obtain information directly from the carriers
allowing the Company to reasonably and reliably estimate the expected renewal
premiums. Revenue is recognized based upon these estimates at a policy's renewal
date. For those policies where the Company is unable to obtain information to
reasonably estimate the expected renewal premiums, revenue is not recognized
until the confirmation has been received from the insurance carrier that the
client's premium payment has been received. The Company is notified in advance
if a client plans to surrender, so adjustments in subsequent periods due to
cancellations are infrequent and minor. Revenue associated with policies to be
surrendered is not recognized. Given the homogenous nature of such cases and
historical information about chargebacks, the Company is able to accurately
estimate the revenue earned. The Company currently maintains a chargeback
allowance, which is monitored on a quarterly basis for adequacy. Service fees
are received annually on the policy anniversary date. Fees related to future
services to be provided are recognized as the services are rendered. The
majority of fees under these agreements are billed annually at the beginning of
the service period. The revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the
service period. The services expected to be performed for the client are
outlined in the servicing agreements. Consulting fee revenue consists of fees
charged by Pearl Meyer & Partners, Human Capital Practice, and Federal Policy
Group for the services the Company performs in advising its clients. These fees
are generally based on a rate per hour arrangement or a fixed monthly fee and
are earned when the services are rendered.
Commissions and Fee Expense -- Commissions and fee expense comprise the
portion of the total commission revenue that is earned by and paid to both
employee and independent sales producers.
44
CLARK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Advertising -- Advertising and marketing costs are charged to operations
when incurred. Total expenses for 2004, 2003, and 2002 were $1.9 million, $3.5
million, and $2.5 million, respectively.
Income Taxes -- Income taxes are accounted for under the liability method.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax
consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax
basis and operating loss carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled.
Cash and Cash Equivalents -- The Company considers all highly liquid
instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash
equivalents. The Company has cash balances at financial institutions in excess
of the $100 thousand limit insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Uninsured cash in bank accounts, including restricted cash, aggregated
approximately $35.2 million and $22.0 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and
believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash and cash
equivalents. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company had restricted cash of
$12.0 million and $19.0 million related to the asset-backed notes outstanding,
respectively.
Stock-Based Compensation -- The Company applies Accounting Principles Board
("APB") Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, in accounting
for its stock-based compensation plans for employees and directors as allowed
under Statement of Financial Standards, SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation as Amended by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
- - Transition and Disclosure - An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123, and
provides the pro forma disclosures required by SFAS No. 123. The Company
accounts for stock options granted to non-employees other than directors under
the provisions of SFAS No. 123. The Company grants stock options at an exercise
price equal to the quoted market price of its stock on the grant date. Since the
stock options have no intrinsic value on the grant date, no compensation expense
is recorded in connection with the stock option grants. Generally, stock options
vest 25 percent on each anniversary of the grant date, are fully vested five
years from the grant date and have a term of ten years. For purposes of
calculating basic and diluted earnings per share, exercised stock options are
considered outstanding. Under the treasury stock method, unexercised stock
options with fair market values of the underlying stock greater than the stock
options' exercise prices are considered common stock equivalents for the
purposes of calculating diluted earnings per share for periods when there are
positive earnings and the incremental effect would be dilutive.
The pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share,
required by SFAS No. 123 has been determined as if the Company accounted for its
stock based compensation plans under the fair value method. The fair value of
each option grant was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used for
grants in 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively:
2004 2003 2002
---- ---- ----
Dividend yield........................................ None None None
Volatility............................................ 57.9% 62.9% 64.8%
Risk-free interest rates.............................. 3.6% 5.2% 5.2%
Expected life (years)................................. 5 5 5
The estimated average fair values of options outstanding in 2004, 2003, and
2002 were $8.24, $8.22, and $10.63, respectively. Had compensation cost for the
Company's stock-based compensation plans been determined in accordance with SFAS
No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation -
Transition and Disclosure - An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123, the
Company's net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the pro
forma amounts indicated below:
45
CLARK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------------
2004 2003 2002
------------ ----------- -----------
NET INCOME
As reported $18,160 $12,682 $17,328
Add: stock-based employee compensation expense
included in reported net income, net of related tax effect - 206 340
Deduct: stock option compensation expense, net of tax (2,428) (1,799) (2,472)
------- ------- -------
Pro forma $15,732 $11,089 $15,196
======= ======= =======
BASIC EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
As reported $ 0.98 $ 0.69 $ 1.03
Pro forma $ 0.85 $ 0.60 $ 0.90
DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
As reported $ 0.97 $ 0.68 $ 0.99
Pro forma $ 0.84 $ 0.59 $ 0.87
Hedging Transactions -- The Company does not enter into derivative
transactions except to mitigate interest rate risk. All derivative instruments
are reported in the consolidated financial statements at fair value. Changes in
the fair value of derivatives are recorded each period in earnings or other
comprehensive income (loss), depending on whether the derivative is designated
and effective as part of a hedged transaction, and on the type of hedge
transaction. Gains or losses on derivative instruments reported in other
comprehensive income (loss) are reclassified as earnings in the period in which
earnings are affected by the underlying hedged item, and the ineffective portion
of all hedges are recognized in earnings in the current period. In 2004 and
2003, the Company entered into interest rate swaps to match floating rate debt
with fixed rate interest payments periodically for three-month LIBOR-based debt.
Goodwill -- Goodwill is tested annually for impairment or whenever changes
in circumstances indicate impairment might exist.
Other Identifiable Intangible Assets -- The Company has identifiable
intangible assets representing the excess of the costs of acquired businesses
over the fair values of the tangible net assets associated with the acquisition.
Other identifiable intangible assets consist of the net present value of future
cash flows from existing business at the acquisition date, and non-compete
agreements with the former owners. Non-compete agreements are amortized over the
period of the agreements. The net present value of inforce revenue is typically
amortized between 20 and 30 years (the expected average policy duration). Annual
amortization of net present value of inforce revenue is equal to the reduction
in the present value of the adjusted revenue stream from the beginning of the
year to the end of the year. Amortization expense related to identifiable
intangible assets was $18.2 million in 2004, $21.6 million in 2003, and $9.2
million in 2002. The Company's policy is to review intangible and other
long-lived assets for impairment on an annual basis or whenever changes in
circumstances indicate that an impairment might exist. When any indicators are
present, the estimated undiscounted cash flows are compared to the carrying
amount of the assets. If the undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying
amount, an impairment loss is recorded. Any write-downs are treated as permanent
reductions in the carrying amount of the asset.
Equipment and Leasehold Improvements -- Equipment and leasehold
improvements are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation
expense is provided in amounts sufficient to relate the cost of assets to
operations over the estimated service lives using straight line and accelerated
methods. The Company depreciates furniture, equipment, and computer software
over periods of three to seven years, while leasehold improvements are amortized
over the lease period. The Company capitalizes costs associated with software
developed or obtained for internal use when both the preliminary project stage
is completed and management has committed to funding the project. Thereafter,
all direct costs are capitalized. Capitalization of costs ceases no later than
the point at which the project is substantially complete and ready for its
intended purpose.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments -- The carrying amount of cash and cash
equivalents, accounts and notes receivable, accounts payable, and other
financial instruments approximate their fair values principally because of the
short-term nature of these instruments. See Note 16, "Financial Instruments" for
additional information on financial instruments.
Reclassifications -- Certain 2003 and 2002 amounts have been reclassified
to conform to 2004 presentation.
46
CLARK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
2. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 123(R), Shared-Based
Payment which supersedes Accounting Principle Board ("APB") Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and its related implementation
guidance. SFAS No. 123(R) requires companies to recognize in the income
statement the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity-based
compensation issued to employees. The requirements of SFAS 123(R) are effective
for the first interim or annual reporting period ending after June 15, 2005. The
Company will be required to adopt the provisions of SFAS 123(R) as of July 1,
2005. The Company is currently evaluating the impact to the financial statements
of adoption of this pronouncement.
3. ACQUISITIONS
Following is a description of the acquisitions made during 2003 and 2002.
The results of operations for each acquired entity have been included in the
accompanying consolidated statements of income from the effective date of the
respective acquisition. There were no acquisitions in 2004.
2003 Acquisitions -- In 2003, the Company acquired the following entities
for an aggregate purchase price of $4.2 million paid in cash (includes expenses
paid) and 44,298 shares of the Company's common stock valued at $630 thousand:
o Executive Benefit Solutions, LLC, located in Memphis, Tennessee,
specializes in providing strategic compensation, benefit, and
bank-owned life insurance portfolio consulting services to banks in
the Northeast, is included in the Company's Banking Practice segment;
o Blackwood Planning Corporation, located in West Palm Beach, Florida,
specializes in providing strategic compensation, benefit, and
bank-owned life insurance portfolio consulting services to banks in
the Southeast, is included in the Company's Banking Practice segment;
and
o Inforce revenue from the president of one of the Company's practices,
related to policies sold when the employee was a consultant prior to
his employment by the Company as practice president, is included in
the Executive Benefits Practice segment.
Additional consideration of $14.4 million in cash is payable to previous
owners of Executive Benefit Solutions and Blackwood Planning Corporation if
certain objectives are met over the three and one-half years following the
acquisition. If earned, these payments will be accounted for as additional
goodwill. As of December 31, 2004, additional consideration of $9.8 million was
earned of which $3.3 million remains accrued in "accrued liabilities" and $1.8
million remains accrued in "other non-current liabilities" on the consolidated
balance sheet.
The net present value of inforce revenue and goodwill recorded in the
allocation of purchase price related to the 2003 acquisitions mentioned above
amounted to $980 thousand and $1.7 million, respectively. Inforce revenue was
assigned to the Executive Benefit Practice segment and the goodwill was assigned
to the Banking Practice segment. The remaining purchase price was allocated to
non-compete agreements, which are assigned to the Banking Practice segment, and
have terms of six years.
Long, Miller & Associates, LLC. -- On November 26, 2002, the Company
acquired Long, Miller & Associates, LLC ("LongMiller"). Based in Greensboro,
North Carolina, LongMiller specializes in bank-owned life insurance portfolio
services. The acquisition combines the two largest distributors of bank-owned
life insurance, as LongMiller was merged into the Company's existing Banking
Practice. The purchase price was $403.5 million before acquisition costs of
approximately $736 thousand, consisting of a cash payment at closing of $346.1
million, $37.4 million of asset-backed notes, and 1,196,888 shares of the
Company's common stock valued at $20 million. The cash portion of the
acquisition was financed by borrowing $87.5 million from the Company's existing
debt facility, with the remainder through a capital markets transaction
involving the securitization of a majority of the inforce revenues of
LongMiller. The Company allocated $4.4 million to tangible assets acquired, $5.2
million to non-compete agreements, and the remaining amount was allocated to
inforce revenue. The non-compete agreements and inforce revenue are being
amortized over seven years and 30 years, respectively. The results of LongMiller
are included in the Company's results beginning November 26, 2002.
The unaudited pro forma information below presents the Company's results as
if the acquisition of LongMiller had occurred on January 1, 2002.
47
CLARK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2002
-------------------
Pro Forma
Revenue.................... $329,435
Net income................. 17,534
Diluted earnings per share. 1.00
Federal Policy Group -- On February 25, 2002, the Company acquired the
Federal Policy Group of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Based in Washington, D.C.,
Federal Policy Group is a consulting practice representing Fortune 500
companies, trade associations, and other businesses before the government on
legislative and regulatory policy matters. This acquisition allows the Company
to continue to expand its service offerings to the corporate market. The
purchase price was $11.0 million before acquisition costs of approximately $28
thousand, consisting of a cash payment at closing of $5.0 million and $6.0
million of contingent payments over the next four years based upon attainment of
established performance criteria. If earned, the contingent payments would be
paid in cash and recorded as additional goodwill. Since its acquisition by the
Company, Federal Policy Group has attained its total established performance
criteria. Accordingly, all amounts have been earned with $4.8 million paid and
$1.2 million accrued in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2004.
Of the purchase price, $2.3 million was allocated to non-compete agreements,
which are being amortized over six years with the remaining purchase price being
allocated to goodwill. The results of the Federal Policy Group are included in
the Company's results beginning February 25, 2002.
Other 2002 Acquisitions -- In 2002, the Company also acquired the following
entities for an aggregate purchase price of $5.0 million paid in cash (cash
amount includes expenses paid) and 57,478 shares of its common stock valued at
$1.2 million:
o Comiskey Kaufman, located in Houston, Texas, specializes in executive
benefits consulting for major companies in the Southwest, is included
in the Company's Executive Benefits Practice segment, and
o Hilgenberg and Associates, located in Minneapolis, Minnesota,
specializes in providing compensation, benefit, and business-owned
life insurance consulting services to banks located in the Midwest, is
included in the Company's Banking Practice segment.
Additional consideration of $4.5 million in cash and $1 million in common
stock is payable to the previous owners of Comiskey Kaufman and Hilgenberg and
Associates if certain objectives are met over the three years following
acquisition. If earned, these payments will be accounted for as additional
goodwill. As of December 31, 2004, additional consideration of $4.3 million has
been earned of which $1.9 million is accrued in "accrued liabilities" on the
consolidated balance sheet. No additional consideration can be earned for these
acquisitions.
The net present value of inforce revenue and goodwill recorded in the
allocation of purchase price related to the other 2002 acquisitions amounted to
$5.2 million and $500 thousand, respectively. Inforce revenue was assigned to
the Executive Benefit Practice segment and the goodwill was assigned to the
Banking Practice segment. The remaining purchase price was allocated to
non-compete agreements, which are assigned to the Banking Practice segment.
4. HUMAN CAPITAL PRACTICE
In the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company reorganized its executive
compensation consulting practices. As part of the reorganization, certain of the
operations and employees of the Human Capital Practice were transferred to the
Pearl Meyer & Partners practice. In addition, four partners and six staff
members were terminated which resulted in exiting certain activities of the
practice and creating unused leased office space in numerous cities. The Company
recorded a charge of $7.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2003 relating to the
reorganization of which $3.3 million remains accrued on the consolidated balance
sheet as of December 31, 2004. The components of the $7.5 million charge
included $1.1 million for costs associated with employee terminations, $5.1
million for exit costs relating to the expected remaining future cash outlays
associated with leases on vacated facilities until lease terminations, bonuses
of $1.0 million related to renegotiations of certain bonus agreements to new
arrangements necessary to facilitate the reorganization, and $300 thousand for
impairment of assets previously utilized by the Human Capital Practice. There
were cash payments of approximately $500 thousand in the fourth quarter of 2003.
The remaining business of the Human Capital Practice consists of
actuarial/retirement plan and investment advisory services.
48
CLARK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The Company will continue to evaluate the remaining restructuring reserve
as plans are being executed. As a result, there may be additional charges or
reversals in future periods. The following summarizes the component of the
charge and cash payments during the year ended December 31, 2004 and the ending
reserve balance.
RESERVE BALANCE CASH RESERVE BALANCE
JANUARY 1, 2004 PAYMENTS ADJUSTMENTS NON CASH ITEMS DECEMBER 31, 2004
--------------- -------- ----------- -------------- -----------------
Employee termination costs $1,049 ($ 265) ($227) ($232) $ 325
Lease costs 4,732 (1,930) 144 - 2,946
Bonus payments 1,027 (1,027) - - -
Other 147 (32) (115) - -
------ ------- ----- ----- ------
Total $6,955 ($3,254) ($198) ($232) $3,271
====== ======= ===== ===== ======
Effective January 1, 2005, the Human Capital Practice was merged into
Executive Benefits Practice.
5. EXECUTIVE BENEFITS PRACTICE RESTRUCTURING COSTS
During the first quarter of 2003, the Company committed to a plan to
consolidate the business support services of the Executive Benefits Practice in
Dallas, Texas. As a result, the Company planned to significantly reduce
operations in the Los Angeles, California and Bethesda, Maryland offices. The
move from Los Angeles was substantially completed by July 31, 2004 and the
Bethesda move was substantially completed by September 30, 2004.
During the third quarter of 2004, the Company entered into a sublease
agreement for some of the space vacated as a result of reduced operations in the
Los Angeles, California office. For the years ended December 31, 2004 and
December 31, 2003, the Company recorded expense of approximately $729 thousand
and $800 thousand, respectively related to the reduced operations in Los Angeles
and Bethesda. These amounts are included in general and administrative expenses
on the consolidated statement of income for the years ended December 31, 2004
and 2003. The reserve balance was paid out as of December 31, 2004.
6. FINANCING COSTS
In the first quarter of 2004, the Company wrote off approximately $1.5
million of costs associated with the prospective securitization financing that
the Company is no longer pursuing. These costs are included in "other income
(expense), net" in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended
December 31, 2004.
7. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
Major categories of accounts receivable are as follows:
AS OF DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------
2004 2003
---- ----
Accounts receivable - trade.... $45,855 $48,774
Accounts receivable allowance.. (1,467) (1,296)
------- -------
$44,388 $47,478
======= =======
The rollforward of the accounts receivable allowance is as follows:
AS OF DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------
2004 2003 2002
---- ---- ----
Beginning balance................. ($1,296) ($1,089) ($ 822)
Write offs........................ 805 999 638
Expense........................... (976) (1,206) (905)
------- ------- -------
Ending balance.................... ($1,467) ($1,296) ($1,089)
======= ======= =======
As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, there were approximately $2.6 million and
$2.3 million, respectively, of unbilled receivables included in accounts
receivable on the consolidated balance sheets. These unbilled amounts, the
majority of which relate to in-process consulting projects, are typically billed
during the quarter immediately following the reporting period.
49
CLARK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
8. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The Company adopted SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, in
the first quarter of 2002. The Company tested goodwill for impairment in 2002
using the two-step process prescribed in SFAS No. 142. The first step is a
determination of potential impairment, while the second step measures the amount
of the impairment, if any. The Company performed the required impairment tests
of goodwill as of January 1, 2002 in the first quarter of 2002. An after-tax
impairment charge of $523 thousand ($892 thousand before tax) resulting from
these impairment tests is reflected as the cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle in 2002. The Company performs its annual goodwill
impairment analysis in the fourth quarter of each year. No additional impairment
was recorded in 2004 and 2003.
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill between December 31, 2003 and
December 31, 2004 by reporting units are as follows:
BALANCE BALANCE
DECEMBER 31, 2003 EARNOUTS DECEMBER 31, 2004
-------------------------- ------------- -----------------------
Executive Benefits Practice $ 16,438 $ 4,353 $ 20,791
Banking Practice 44,723 7,327 52,050
Healthcare Group 14,076 - 14,076
Management Science Associates 5,010 - 5,010
Pearl Meyer & Partners 36,981 - 36,981
Human Capital Practice 864 200 1,064
Federal Policy Group 8,766 - 8,766
Corporate 30 - 30
-------- ------- --------
Total $126,888 $11,880 $138,768
======== ======= ========
Information regarding the Company's other intangible assets follows:
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2004 AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2003
---------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------
CARRYING ACCUMULATED CARRYING ACCUMULATED
AMOUNT AMORTIZATION NET AMOUNT AMORTIZATION NET
------------ --------------- ----------- ----------- -------------- ------------
Inforce revenue $500,521 ($60,877) $439,644 $499,800 ($44,305) $455,495
Non-compete agreements 10,669 (4,835) 5,834 10,669 (3,249) 7,420
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total $511,190 ($65,712) $445,478 $510,469 ($47,554) $462,915
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Net present value of future cash flows from inforce revenues are amortized
between 20 and 30 years, periods representative of policy duration. Non-compete
agreements are amortized over five to ten years according to the terms of the
agreements. Amortization of goodwill ceased January 1, 2002 upon the Company's
adoption of SFAS No. 142.
For the past three years, the Company's amortization of intangibles was
comprised of the following:
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------------
2004 2003 2002
---------- ---------- ----------
Present value of future cash flows from inforce revenue... $16,572 $19,971 $8,641
Non-compete agreements.................................... 1,586 1,608 608
------- ------- ------
Total $18,158 $21,579 $9,249
======= ======= ======
The Company estimates that its amortization for 2005 through 2009 for all
acquisitions consummated to date will be as follows:
50
CLARK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NON-COMPETE
INFORCE REVENUE AGREEMENTS TOTAL
-------------------- ------------------ ----------
2005.................................... $13,811 $1,562 $15,373
2006.................................... 13,221 1,562 14,783
2007.................................... 12,858 1,537 14,395
2008.................................... 12,914 1,120 14,034
2009.................................... 12,988 126 13,114
9. CONTINGENT CONSIDERATION
As a result of the Company's acquisition program, it has $18.8 million of
contingent consideration potentially due to the former owners of its acquired
companies, including $12.8 million that has been earned and is accrued on the
consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2004. These amounts are payable as
additional consideration for the acquired operating unit having met certain
performance criteria negotiated at the time of the purchase. A summary of the
amounts payable if the criteria are met is as follows for acquisitions that were
completed as of December 31, 2004:
POTENTIAL AMOUNT PAYABLE IN CASH SHARES SHARE VALUE (1)
- --------------------------- ---- ------ ---------------
2005 $10,093 34,697 $539
2006 5,703 - -
2007 2,500 - -
------- ------ ----
$18,296 34,697 $539
======= ====== ====
(1) Shares determined using the share value computed using the closing price of
the Company's common stock at December 31, 2004 of $15.52 per share.
10. EQUIPMENT AND LEASEHOLD IMPROVEMENTS
Major classifications of equipment and leasehold improvements are as
follows:
AS OF DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------
2004 2003
---- ----
Computer software, office furniture and equipment $22,957 $20,346
Capitalized software.............................. 6,379 5,729
Leasehold improvements...................... 3,377 3,118
------- -------
32,713 29,193
Accumulated depreciation and amortization (20,573) (15,909)
------- -------
$12,140 $13,284
======= =======
Depreciation expense was $5.7 million, $5.7 million, and $4.4 million for
2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively.
11. ACCRUED LIABILITIES
Major categories of accrued liabilities are as follows:
AS OF DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------
2004 2003
---- ----
Bonuses payable............................. $19,476 $15,603
Commissions payable......................... 8,727 9,692
Earnouts payable............................... 10,400 7,442
Other....................................... 15,542 13,911
------- -------
$54,145 $46,648
======= =======
12. TAXES
Income tax expense from operations consists of the following components:
51
CLARK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------
2004 2003 2002
---- ---- ----
Current:
Federal.......................... $ 940 $1,396 $ 8,328
State and local.................. 123 371 2,947
Deferred:
Federal.......................... 9,726 5,548 908
State and local.................. 433 774 221
------- ------ -------
$11,222 $8,089 $12,404
======= ====== =======
Total income taxes incurred consists of the following components:
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------
2004 2003 2002
---- ---- ----
Income tax expense from
operations........................ $11,222 $8,089 $12,404
Income tax benefit in equity from
exercise of options............... (149) (356) (24)
Income tax expense (benefit) in
equity from interest rate swaps.. 7 (63) -
------- ------ -------
Total income tax incurred $11,080 $7,670 $12,380
======= ====== =======
A reconciliation of the 2004, 2003, and 2002 income tax expense computed by
applying the statutory rate to income before income taxes to the actual taxes is
as follows:
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------
2004 2003 2002
---- ---- ----
U.S. Federal statutory rate................... $10,284 $7,062 $10,589
State income tax -- net of federal benefit.... 996 970 1,950
Tax liability adjustment and prior year taxes. 116 (146) (123)
Other - net................................... (174) 203 (12)
------- ------ -------
$11,222 $8,089 $12,404
======= ====== =======
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences
between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting
purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of
the Company's deferred tax liabilities and assets are as follows:
AS OF DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------
2004 2003
---- ----
LONG-TERM:
Intangible assets............................. ($ 28,776) ($ 19,989)
Depreciation.................................. (1,328) (1,077)
Accrued liabilities........................... 1,679 1,270
Reorganization costs.......................... 1,229 2,375
Deferred compensation......................... 1,582 2,229
Net operating loss............................ 1,023 1,135
--------- ---------
Long-term net deferred tax liabilities
before allowance........................... (24,591) (14,057)
Valuation allowance (161) -
--------- ---------
TOTAL LONG-TERM NET DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES ($ 24,752) ($ 14,057)
========= =========
CURRENT:
Accrued liabilities............................ $ 1,347 $ 1,263
Prepaid expenses............................... (814) (1,236)
Net operating loss............................. 249 226
--------- ---------
TOTAL CURRENT NET DEFERRED TAX ASSETS.............. $ 782 $ 253
========= =========
52
CLARK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, the Company
considers the likelihood that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets may
not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent
upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which the
temporary differences become deductible. The Company considers the scheduled
reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax
planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon the level of
historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income over the
periods with respect to which the deferred tax assets are deductible, the
Company believes it is more likely than not that it will realize the vast
majority of the benefits of deductible differences. However, the Company is
uncertain if it will benefit from certain state net operating losses.
Accordingly, a valuation allowance of $161 thousand was deemed necessary as of
December 31, 2004.
The Internal Revenue Service is currently auditing the Company's Federal
income tax returns for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002.
13. LONG-TERM DEBT
AS OF DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------
2004 2003
---- ----
Term loan payable to banks................................ $ - $ 15,495
Revolving credit loan payable to banks.................... - 15,400
Notes payable to former stockholder of acquired business.. 4,722 5,897
Asset-backed notes........................................ 274,827 288,729
Trust preferred debt ..................................... 45,000 27,000
-------- --------
324,549 352,521
Less current maturities................................... 14,927 16,553
-------- --------
$309,622 $335,968
======== ========
Securitization -- In order to finance the acquisition of LongMiller, the
Company entered into a $305 million securitization of a majority of the inforce
revenues of LongMiller. In connection with the securitization transactions, CBC
Insurance Revenue Securitization, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company
("CBC IRS"), issued $305 million aggregate principal amount of notes secured by
insurance commission streams (the "Securitized Notes") in a private placement
(the "Securitization Transaction"). CBC IRS purchased such insurance commission
streams from LongMiller. CBC IRS is a special purpose company that holds certain
rights to commissions and other compensation arising from the sale of bank-owned
or company-owned life insurance policies. While CBC IRS is included in the
Company's consolidated financial statements and has elected to be treated as a
disregarded entity for federal income tax purposes, it is a separate legal
entity. The assets held by CBC IRS are legally owned by CBC IRS and are not
available to creditors of the Company, LongMiller, or the Company's other
subsidiaries. The securitization is broken into four traunches, each rated by
Standard & Poors. The traunches consist of the A-1 and A-2 class totaling
approximately $167 million and each rated "AAA", the B-class traunch of $108
million rated "A" and the C-class traunch of $30 million rated "BBB". The
weighted average interest cost over the 20-year life of the asset-backed notes
is approximately seven percent. The securitized inforce revenues, which are
approximately $56 million in 2004, are used to pay interest and principal to the
noteholders. The securitization is treated as debt and is included in the
Banking Practice segment, and is non-recourse to the Company. Assuming the
securitized notes amortize as expected, the securitization will provide residual
cash flow to the Company of approximately five percent for the securitized
inforce revenue in the initial years, and the Company's total residual interest
would equal approximately 28 percent of the total securitized inforce revenue
over the life of the notes. Such residual cash flow to the Company (both in any
year and in total) may be less than that expected (or none) depending on the
actual insurance commission streams from the policies underlying the
securitization. The note agreement requires cash flow from the assets
securitizing the notes to be held in a separate account. As of December 31,
2004, there was restricted cash of $12 million related to such requirements.
As a result of the surrender of a number of insurance policies by a single
customer of the Company in December 2004, the Company will cease receiving
commissions and related payments in respect of such surrendered insurance
policies. The amount of commissions and related payments included in the 2002
Securitization will be directed solely to the payment of principal and interest
on the notes and related administration fees and expenses associated with the
2002 Securitization until such time as the Reserve Account established as part
of the 2002 Securitization is replenished.
Credit Facility -- In November 2003, the Company amended and restated its
December 28, 1999 Credit Agreement revising
53
CLARK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
the amount available under the credit facility to $80.0 million for a three year
period ending December 31, 2006. In December 2003, a new participant bank was
added to the facility increasing the facility amount to $90 million. The credit
facility amount was reduced dollar for dollar by $18.0 million of repayments in
2003 and 2004 on the term portion of the facility. The Company had $72.0 million
available under its credit line at December 31, 2004. The Company's assets are
pledged to the bank group as part of the credit facility except for cash flows
from commissions to be received upon the renewals of specified inforce policies
acquired in connection with the acquisition of LongMiller. Interest on the
revolver is based upon prime or LIBOR, plus a spread, at the Company's option.
Interest on the revolver is paid monthly for prime rate borrowings and at
maturity of each LIBOR borrowing. The Company is obligated to pay a commitment
fee based on the daily average of undrawn funds under the credit agreement. The
fee is a minimum of .25% and a maximum of .60% based on the ratio of
consolidated indebtedness to income before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization for the most recent four quarters on a rolling quarterly basis.
The restrictive covenants under the credit facility provide for the
maintenance of a minimum ratio of fixed charges, a maximum allowable leverage
ratio, a minimum level of net worth (stockholders' equity), and a maximum ratio
of debt to capitalization. The Company was in compliance with all its
restrictive covenants as of December 31, 2004. The Company's restrictive
covenants may limit its borrowing ability under its credit line.
Trust Preferred Debt -- In 2003 and 2004, the Company raised approximately
$45 million from its participation in three pooled trust preferred transactions,
in which it issued long-term subordinated debt securities with a floating rate
based on three month LIBOR plus a weighted average spread of 400 basis points
(weighted average interest rate of 6.2% as of December 31, 2004). The Company
used the net proceeds to pay down its credit facility. The pooled trust
preferred debt principal is payable in one payment due in 30 years from the
issuance date with interest paid quarterly.
Phynque, Inc. Notes -- In connection with the purchase of Phynque, Inc.
d/b/a Management Compensation Group/Healthcare, the Company issued an $8.7
million promissory note payable in thirty-two equal quarterly installments of
principal and interest at 10%. A portion of the promissory note is guaranteed
personally by the Company's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.
At December 31, 2004, future payments under all debt arrangements are as
follows:
2005...................... $ 14,927
2006...................... 6,347
2007...................... 13,944
2008...................... 13,299
2009...................... 13,390
2010 and thereafter....... 262,642
--------
$324,549
========
14. DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN AMENDMENT
Effective September 17, 2004, the Clark Deferred Compensation Plan ("Plan")
was amended whereby participants can no longer reallocate deferrals out of the
Plan's Company stock fund. If a participant receives a distribution from the
Plan, the portion of the distribution related to deferrals allocated to Company
stock will be paid in Company stock. Prior to the amendment, participants were
able to reallocate amounts in the Company's stock fund into other investment
options and received their distributions in cash. As a result of the amendment,
approximately $1.8 million that had been classified as a long-term liability was
reclassified into the equity section.
15. STOCK REPURCHASE
On August 25, 2004, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had
authorized the Company to repurchase up to $5 million of the Company's
outstanding common stock on the open market. On November 23, 2004, the Company
announced that its Board of Directors had authorized the Company to expand its
existing stock repurchase program to a total of $10 million of the Company's
outstanding common stock, from the original authorized level of $5 million.
During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company repurchased approximately
484 thousand shares for approximately $7.2 million.
On January 25, 2005, the Company's Board of Directors authorized it to
expand its existing stock repurchase program to a total of $15 million of its
outstanding common stock, from the previously authorized level of $10 million.
54
CLARK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
16. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Derivative Financial Instruments. The Company has used derivatives only for
hedging purposes to mitigate interest rate risk. The following is a summary of
the Company's risk management strategies and the effect of these strategies on
its consolidated financial statements.
Cash Flow Hedging Strategy. The Company has limited transactions that fall
under the accounting rules of SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended by SFAS No. 137, SFAS No. 138 and
SFAS No. 149. From time to time, the Company uses financial instruments,
including interest rate swap agreements, to manage exposure to interest rate
risk. On May 18, 2004, the Company entered into an interest rate swap with a
total non-amortizing notional value of $7 million to hedge our LIBOR-based debt.
On January 7, 2003, the Company entered into an interest rate swap with an
amortizing notional value of $28 million to hedge outstanding LIBOR-based debt.
These swaps have been designated as cash flow hedges. As such, the changes in
the fair value of the interest rate swaps are recorded in other comprehensive
income ("OCI") for the effective portion of the hedge, while the ineffective
portion is recorded immediately in earnings. Amounts are reclassified from OCI
to earnings as the interest rate swaps affect earnings. There have been no
charges to earnings for ineffectiveness for the year ended December 31, 2004.
The fair value of these interest rate swap agreements, based upon market quotes,
was a liability of approximately $40 thousand at December 31, 2004. The notional
amount of the January 7, 2003 interest rate swap amortizes $1.4 million per
quarter. The terms of these interest rate swaps are as follows (fair value in
thousands):
EFFECTIVE NOTIONAL AMOUNT AT FIXED RATE VARIABLE RATE FAIR VALUE AS OF
DATE MATURITY DATE DECEMBER 31, 2004 TO BE PAID TO BE RECEIVED DECEMBER 31, 2004
---- ------------- ----------------- ---------- -------------- -----------------
January 7, 2003 December 31, 2007 $16,800 2.85% LIBOR $132
May 18, 2004 March 31, 2009 $ 7,000 4.44% LIBOR ( 172)
-----
Total ($ 40)
======
On January 7, 2003, the Company entered into an interest rate swap,
separate from the interest rate swap described above. This second January 7,
2003 interest rate swap had an amortizing notional value of $22 million. In
November of 2003, in conjunction with the renewal of the Company's credit
facility, this interest rate swap was terminated.
The following methods and assumptions were used in estimating the fair
value disclosures for financial instruments:
Long- and Short-Term Debt. The carrying amounts of the borrowings under the
Company's loan arrangements approximate their fair value. The fair values of the
long-term debt are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on the
Company's current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing
arrangements.
Interest Rate Swaps. The carrying amount of interest rate swaps is based
upon confirmation from the counterparty.
The carrying amounts and fair values of the Company's financial instruments
at December 31, 2004 and 2003, are as follows:
AS OF DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------------------------
2004 2003
-------------------------- --------------------------
CARRYING FAIR CARRYING FAIR
AMOUNT VALUE AMOUNT VALUE
------ ----- ------ -----
Short-term debt..................... $ 14,927 $ 15,285 $ 16,553 $ 17,525
Long-term debt...................... 309,622 309,772 335,968 342,046
Interest rate swaps................. 40 40 157 157
55
CLARK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
17. STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Under SFAS No. 130, Comprehensive Income, the comprehensive income for the
Company consists of net income and changes in fair value of interest rate swaps,
net of tax. Shown below is the Company's comprehensive income:
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------
2004 2003 2002
---- ---- ----
Net income $18,160 $12,682 $17,328
Change in fair value of interest rate swaps,
net of tax 110 (245) -
------- ------- -------
Comprehensive income $18,270 $12,437 $17,328
======= ======= =======
18. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted
earnings per common share:
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------
2004 2003 2002
---- ---- ----
NUMERATOR:
Income, before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle $ 18,160 $ 12,682 $ 17,851
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle,
net of tax - - (523)
---------- ---------- ----------
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per common
share $ 18,160 $ 12,682 $ 17,328
========== ========== ==========
DENOMINATOR
Basic earnings per common share -
weighted average shares outstanding 18,542,232 18,338,963 16,896,657
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options 204,837 189,871 456,490
Contingent shares earned not issued 58,449 212,099 159,959
---------- ---------- ----------
Diluted earnings per share - weighted average shares
plus assumed conversions 18,805,518 18,740,934 17,513,106
========== ========== ==========
PER COMMON SHARE
Basic Earnings per common share, before cumulative
effect of change in accounting principle $ 0.98 $ 0.69 $ 1.06
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle - - (0.03)
---------- ---------- ----------
Basic earnings per common share $ 0.98 $ 0.69 $ 1.03
========== ========== ==========
Diluted Earnings per common share, before cumulative
effect of change in accounting principle $ 0.97 $ 0.68 $ 1.02
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle - - (0.03)
---------- ---------- ----------
Diluted Earnings per common share $ 0.97 $ 0.68 $ 0.99
========== ========== ==========
For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002 there are
approximately 959 thousand, 868 thousand, and 582 thousand, respectively, of
outstanding stock options which are not included in the computation of diluted
earnings per share because the exercise prices of the options were greater than
the average market prices of the Company's common shares during the respective
years. The range of exercise prices for these antidilutive stock options was
between $16.63 and $27.49 at December 31, 2004, $14.31 and $30.30 at December
31, 2003, and $21.50 and $30.30 at December 31, 2002.
56
CLARK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
19. BENEFIT PLANS
Incentive Stock Option Plan. The Incentive Stock Option Plan provided
certain employees options to purchase shares for $4.80 and $7.00 per share;
190,832 shares were granted and no additional options may be granted under this
program. The $4.80 and $7.00 options became fully vested at the date of the
Initial Public Offering. The options expire ten years from the grant date and
are voided within 90 days of the employee's termination or one year from date of
death. No future options will be granted under this plan.
1998 Stock Option Plan. In 1998, the Board of Directors approved a stock
option plan providing for certain employees, directors, and independent
producers to purchase shares at the fair market value at the time the option is
granted. The Plan is administered by a committee of non-employee directors who
have full discretion to determine participation, vesting, and term of the option
at the time of the grant providing that no option may have a term greater than
ten years from the date of the grant. A total of 2,000,000 shares are reserved
for issuance under this plan. The vesting period of the stock options is
generally between three and five years. As of December 31, 2004, 1,924,832
options have been granted under this program and a total of 75,168 shares of the
Company's common stock remain available for grant.
1998 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan. A total of 100,000 shares of
the Company's common stock have been reserved for issuance under its
Non-Employee Director Plan, as amended by the Board of Directors in January
2000. The non-employee director plan is administered by the compensation
committee of the Board. Only nonqualified options may be granted and all of the
Company's non-employee directors participate in the plan. The plan provides for
the automatic grant of stock options to purchase 10,000 shares of the Company's
common stock to each newly elected non-employee director on the first day of the
month following their election. The plan also provides for the automatic grant
of stock options to purchase 4,000 shares of the Company's common stock to
continuing non-employee directors on the first day of the month immediately
following its annual stockholder meeting. The exercise price for stock options
granted under the non-employee director plan is the fair market value of the
Company's common stock on the date of grant. The vesting period of the stock
options is generally between one and three years. As of December 31, 2004,
98,110 options had been granted under the non-employee director plan and a total
of 1,890 shares of the Company' common stock remain available for grant.
2002 Stock Option Plan. On April 30, 2002, the Board of Directors approved
the Clark, Inc. 2002 Stock Option Plan (the "2002 Plan"). A total of 500,000
shares of the Company's common stock have been reserved for issuance under the
2002 Plan. The exercise price for stock options granted under the 2002 Plan is
the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the date of grant. The
vesting period of the stock options is generally between three and five years.
No option may have a term greater than ten years from the date of the grant. As
of December 31, 2004, 254,796 options had been granted under this plan and a
total of 245,204 shares of the Company's common stock remain available for
grant.
2003 Stock Option Plan. On January 28, 2003, the Board of Directors
approved the Clark, Inc. 2003 Stock Option Plan (the "2003 Plan"). A total of
2,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock have been reserved for issuance
under the 2003 Plan. The exercise price for stock options granted under the 2003
Plan is the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the date of
grant. The vesting period of the stock options is generally between three and
five years. No option may have a term greater than ten years from the date of
the grant. As of December 31, 2004, 280,000 options had been granted under this
plan and a total of 1,720,000 shares of the Company's common stock remain
available for grant.
57
CLARK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The following table summarizes the combined status of all of the Company's
stock option plans:
WEIGHTED AVERAGE
OPTIONS EXERCISE PRICE
------------------ -------------------
OUTSTANDING AT JANUARY 1, 2002.................................... 1,760,636 $14.23
Granted......................................................... 351,964 23.25
Exercised....................................................... (75,400) 23.55
Forfeited....................................................... (118,768) 18.20
--------- ------
OUTSTANDING AT DECEMBER 31, 2002.................................. 1,918,432 15.94
Granted......................................................... 300,000 14.33
Exercised....................................................... (167,998) 10.17
Forfeited....................................................... (465,162) 16.94
--------- ------
OUTSTANDING AT DECEMBER 31, 2003.................................. 1,585,272 15.41
Granted......................................................... 330,000 19.36
Exercised....................................................... (153,500) 10.02
Forfeited....................................................... (323,636) 20.39
--------- ------
OUTSTANDING AT DECEMBER 31, 2004.................................. 1,438,136 17.02
=========
EXERCISABLE AT DECEMBER 31, 2004.................................. 1,194,587
=========
EXERCISABLE AT DECEMBER 31, 2003.................................. 868,148
=========
EXERCISABLE AT DECEMBER 31, 2002.................................. 1,132,515
=========
The following table summarizes the stock options outstanding and
exercisable as of December 31, 2004:
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING OPTIONS EXERCISABLE
- ------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE WEIGHTED WEIGHTED
REMAINING AVERAGE AVERAGE
RANGE OF NUMBER CONTRACTUAL LIFE EXERCISE NUMBER EXERCISE
EXERCISE PRICES OUTSTANDING (YEARS) PRICE EXERCISABLE PRICE
- ---------------- ----------- ---------------- -------- ----------- ---------
$4.80 - $7.00 61,101 2.2 $ 5.70 61,101 $ 5.70
$9.00 106,416 2.5 9.00 106,416 9.00
$9.94 - $11.50 149,700 5.9 10.42 62,711 10.36
$11.60 - $14.40 189,300 8.0 13.57 72,140 12.77
$14.75 - $15.93 114,400 4.9 14.94 75,000 14.91
$16.30 - $18.13 127,842 6.1 17.26 127,842 17.26
$18.49 - $19.70 319,000 8.8 19.27 319,000 19.27
$20.30 - $22.90 127,377 8.1 21.73 127,377 21.73
$23.24 - $25.28 195,000 7.0 25.12 195,000 25.12
$27.49 48,000 3.3 27.49 48,000 27.49
--------- ---------
1,438,136 1,194,587
========= =========
As of December 30, 2004, the Company had approximately 381 thousand
unvested underwater (exercise price exceeds the current price) stock options. At
the December 30, 2004 Board of Directors Compensation Committee meeting, the
Compensation Committee approved fully vesting all underwater stock options
($15.85 or greater exercise price) as of December 30, 2004. No other
modifications were made to the stock option plan except for the accelerated
vesting. The Company decided to fully vest all underwater options, as there is
no perceived value in these options to the employee, little retention
ramifications, and to minimize the expense to the Company's consolidated
financial statements when it is required to adopt SFAS 123(R) as of July 1,
2005.
Savings Investment Plan. The Savings Investment Plan is a defined
contribution profit sharing plan, qualifying under Section 401(k) of the
Internal Revenue Code, covering substantially all eligible employees. At the
Company's discretion, it may contribute up to 100% of an eligible participant's
contributions to the Plan, up to a maximum of 3% of the participants' salary.
The Company's contributions to the Plan were $2.2 million, $1.8 million, and
$2.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002,
respectively.
Stock Purchase Plan. On January 28, 2003, the Board of Directors adopted
the amended and restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("ESPP"), under which a
total of 400 thousand shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance.
Any employee who has been employed for 30 days is eligible to participate in
offerings under the Stock Purchase Plan.
The Stock Purchase Plan consists of four semi-annual offerings of common
stock beginning on each January 1 and July 1 in each of the years 2003 and 2004
and terminating on June 30 and December 31 such year. On September 16, 2004, the
Board of Directors approved an amendment to the amended and restated Employee
Stock Purchase Plan effective January 1, 2005. For each of the years 2005 and
2006, the ESPP will consist of four quarterly offerings of common stock
beginning on the first day of January,
58
CLARK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
April, July and October and terminating on March 31, June 30, September 30, and
December 31 of each such year. The maximum number of shares for each offering
period, which could be issued, is 50 thousand for 2003 and 50 thousand plus the
number of unissued shares from prior offerings for each period in 2004. The
maximum number of shares for each offering period will be 25 thousand plus the
number of unissued shares from prior offerings for each period in 2005 and 2006.
The price of the shares under each offering segment in 2003 and 2004 is 85% of
the lower of the closing market price on the day before the offering period
begins or on the day the offering period ends. The price of the shares under
each offering segment in 2005 and 2006 is 85% of the closing market price on the
day the offering period ends.
The Company has, for the expired periods prior to December 31, 2004,
determined that it will purchase the requisite shares on the open market or
utilize shares purchased through the Company's stock repurchase program and has
not issued any additional shares to fulfill this obligation. Future fulfillment
under this Plan may be made through open market purchases or unissued shares, at
the Company's discretion.
During 2004, 2003, and 2002, the Company's employees purchased 62,300,
90,484, and 49,824 shares, respectively of common stock at an average cost to
them of $14.36, $10.16, and $17.89 per share, respectively. The Company's open
market purchases of shares for the employees were made at an average cost of
$13.82, and $21.18 per share during 2003 and 2002, respectively. No purchases
were made by the Company in 2004 specifically for the ESPP.
Key Executive Life Insurance. The Company maintains key man life insurance
policies of $50.0 million on its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and
policies ranging from $1.0 million to $25.0 million on certain other key
executives. As part of the Company's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer's
employment agreement, it agrees to use the proceeds from the key man life
insurance to purchase from the Chairman's estate up to $20 million of common
stock at the closing price on the last trading day immediately preceding his
death.
20. COMMITMENTS
Leases -- The Company conducts operations from leased office facilities.
The Company expects that, in the normal course of business, leases that expire
will be renewed or replaced by other leases; thus it is anticipated that future
minimum lease commitments will not be less than the amount shown in the table
below.
Rental expense for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and, 2002 was
$9.4 million, $16.7 million, and $9.4 million, respectively.
At December 31, 2004, approximate minimum rental commitments under all
non-cancelable leases having terms in excess of a year are as follows:
2005 $ 8,773
2006 7,740
2007 7,289
2008 6,755
2009 4,488
2010 and Thereafter 8,237
-------
$43,282
=======
21. SUPPLEMENTAL COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS
Revenue from supplemental compensation arrangements are based on the size
of the existing block of business on very specific measurement dates as outlined
in the various arrangements. The amount of revenue recorded is determined based
on the size of the existing blocks of business as of the specific measurement
dates. The Company realized approximately $11.3 million, $10.3 million, and $7.5
million in revenue under such arrangements for the twelve months ended December
31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively. Potential surrenders will impact future
revenues but not revenues that have been recorded in the Company's financial
statements.
During the first quarter of 2004, the Company completed agreements with two
of its insurance carriers, which will generate additional revenue on its
existing blocks of business and future business. The length of one of the
contracts is three years and the other contract is one year. The agreements
resulted in revenue of approximately $900 thousand for the year ended December
31, 2004. Future payment amounts would be negatively impacted by potential
future surrenders of the inforce business or non-renewal of the agreements and
positively impacted by asset growth of these contracts.
59
CLARK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
During the third quarter of 2003, the Company completed agreements with two
of its insurance carriers, which will generate additional revenue on its
existing blocks of business with these carriers. The length of one of the
contracts is five and one half years and the other contract is one year. The
contracts automatically renew at the end of each term unless notice is given by
one of the parties. The agreements resulted in revenue of $4.1 million and $3.5
million for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and
provide for additional payments upon certain conditions and measurement dates.
The future payment amounts are based on the cash value (or fair value) of the
Company's existing inforce business with these carriers at specified dates of
measurement. Future payment amounts would be negatively impacted by potential
future surrenders of the inforce business or non-renewal of the agreements and
positively impacted by asset growth of the Company's business with these
carriers.
On September 25, 2002, the Company entered into an Administrative Services
Agreement and Bonus Forfeiture Agreement with an affiliate of AUSA Holding,
Inc., one of its principal stockholders and insurance carrier. The Company
received payments of approximately $2.4 and $2.5 million during the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, under the terms of this agreement.
During 2002, the Company received $2.5 million for services rendered prior to
and through September 30, 2002 and recognized a total of $3.1 million in 2002,
pursuant to this agreement. Under the terms of this agreement, the Company
expects to continue to receive approximately $2.5 million annually from the
carrier for a period of 30 years, depending upon certain conditions. Of this
annual amount, $2.0 million is included in the cash flows securitizing the
asset-backed notes issued to finance the acquisition of LongMiller, and the
Company will not have access to this cash for general corporate purposes until
the securitized notes are fully paid. This revenue, net of amounts provided for
chargebacks, is being recognized on a monthly basis. The amounts received are
subject to chargeback (reimbursement of a portion of amounts received) if any
policies under this agreement are surrendered or exchanged. Any chargeback
amounts would be deducted from the next scheduled payment.
22. SEGMENTS AND RELATED INFORMATION
The Company has six reportable segments:
o Executive Benefits Practice - markets, designs, implements,
administers, and finances non-qualified benefit plans for companies of
all sizes including Fortune 1000 companies and other companies which
can benefit from the Company's products and services.
o Banking Practice - offers compensation consulting, executive and
director benefit programs, and bank-owned life insurance to the bank
market.
o Healthcare Group - provides specialized compensation and benefit
services for large and medium sized not-for-profit healthcare
organizations.
o Pearl Meyer & Partners - specializes in executive compensation and
retention programs.
o Human Capital Practice - provides compensation, benefits, and human
resources consulting services and products to major companies
including technology and intellectual capital companies.
o Federal Policy Group - provides a variety of legislative and
regulatory strategic services.
As of January 1, 2003, the Company transferred the operations of Coates
Kenney from its Executive Benefits Practice to its Human Capital Practice. As a
result, the segment information as of, and for the period ended December 31,
2002, has been reclassified to reflect this transfer.
LongMiller, acquired on November 26, 2002, became part of the existing
Banking Practice.
The segment information as of, and for the periods ended December 31, 2004,
2003, and 2002 for the Pearl Meyer & Partners segment reflect the results of,
and information related to, the Rewards and Performance Group and certain Human
Capital Practice employees, who were transferred to Pearl Meyer & Partners as of
October 1, 2003.
On February 25, 2002, the Company acquired the Federal Policy Group from
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
The six reportable segments operate as independent and autonomous business
units with a central corporate staff in North Barrington, Illinois responsible
for finance, strategic planning, human resources, and company-wide policies.
Each segment has its
60
CLARK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
own client base as well as its own marketing, administration, and management.
The Company has disclosed income from operations as the primary measure of
segment earnings (loss). This is the measure of profitability used by the
Company's chief operating decision-maker and the most consistent with the
presentation of profitability reported within the consolidated financial
statements. The accounting policies of the business segment reports are the same
as those described in Note 1, "Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies."
The Company evaluates performance and allocates resources based on
operating income before income taxes, interest, and corporate administrative
expenses. There are no inter-segment revenue or expenses.
Segment information for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002,
is as follows:
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------
2004 2003 2002
---- ---- ----
REVENUES FROM EXTERNAL CUSTOMERS
Executive Benefits Practice....................... $ 72,903 $ 69,988 $ 82,847
Banking Practice.................................. 145,249 165,839 116,036
Healthcare Group.................................. 35,684 36,100 37,906
Pearl Meyer & Partners............................ 33,111 26,871 22,333
Human Capital Practice............................ 8,574 8,540 5,043
Federal Policy Group.............................. 15,707 14,855 9,520
-------- -------- --------
Total segments -- reported................... 311,228 322,193 273,685
Corporate/CSI..................................... 4,354 3,736 4,901
-------- -------- --------
Total consolidated -- reported............... $315,582 $325,929 $278,586
======== ======== ========
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) AND INCOME BEFORE TAXES
Executive Benefits Practice ...................... $ 7,546 $ 2,616 $ 3,683
Banking Practice.................................. 47,103 55,221 37,153
Healthcare Group.................................. 4,414 4,847 4,818
Pearl Meyer & Partners............................ 5,429 1,098 (116)
Human Capital Practice............................ (217) (11,358) (5,421)
Federal Policy Group.............................. 4,681 6,598 4,094
-------- -------- --------
Total segments -- reported................... 68,956 59,022 44,211
Corporate/CSI..................................... (16,018) (14,544) (10,498)
Other income...................................... (1,499) 302 262
Interest -- net ................................. (22,057) (24,009) (3,720)
-------- -------- --------
Income before taxes.......................... $ 29,382 $ 20,771 $ 30,255
======== ======== ========
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION
Executive Benefits Practice....................... $ 4,640 $ 5,040 $ 5,207
Banking Practice.................................. 13,971 16,784 3,666
Healthcare Group.................................. 2,627 2,945 2,947
Pearl Meyer & Partners............................ 637 679 830
Human Capital Practice............................ 72 422 71
Federal Policy Group.............................. 408 403 330
-------- -------- --------
Total segments -- reported................... 22,355 26,273 13,051
Corporate/CSI..................................... 1,467 984 549
-------- -------- --------
Total consolidated -- reported............... $ 23,822 $ 27,257 $ 13,600
======== ======== ========
IDENTIFIABLE ASSETS
Executive Benefits Practice....................... $ 75,301 $ 72,867 $ 82,988
Banking Practice.................................. 487,784 509,370 526,485
Healthcare Group.................................. 31,032 32,996 36,899
Pearl Meyer & Partners............................ 48,355 47,362 44,403
Human Capital Practice............................ 4,739 5,282 13,863
Federal Policy Group.............................. 12,018 11,893 7,413
-------- -------- --------
Total segments -- reported................... 659,229 679,770 712,051
Deferred tax asset................................ 782 253 1,252
Corporate/CSI..................................... 41,282 19,280 21,372
-------- -------- --------
Total consolidated -- reported............... $701,293 $699,303 $734,675
======== ======== ========
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
Executive Benefits Practice....................... $ 1,721 $ 978 $ 797
Banking Practice.................................. 1,355 1,595 1,657
Healthcare Group.................................. 658 539 2,049
Pearl Meyer & Partners............................ 278 95 550
Human Capital Practice............................ - 187 501
Federal Policy Group.............................. 6 44 67
-------- -------- --------
Total segments -- reported................... 4,018 3,438 5,621
Corporate/CSI..................................... 747 985 2,151
-------- -------- --------
Total consolidated -- reported............... $ 4,765 $ 4,423 $ 7,772
======== ======== ========
61
CLARK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Geographic Information -- Virtually all the Company's revenue is derived
from clients located in the United States.
Major Customers and Clients --The Company generated in excess of 25% of its
revenue in 2004 from 29 clients, in 2003 from 37 clients and in 2002 from 41
clients. None of the clients individually accounted for more than 10% of
consolidated revenue. Substantially all of the policies underlying the programs
marketed by the Company are underwritten by 33 life insurance companies, of
which seven accounted for approximately 55.3% of the Company's first year
revenue for the year ended December 31, 2004, 55.7% of its first year revenue
for the year ended December 31, 2003, and 48.3% for the year ended December 31,
2002.
23. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company leases 17,783 square feet of office space and hangar space for
the corporate aircraft from entities owned by the Company's Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer, Tom Wamberg, with base rent of approximately $449 thousand
annually. The office space lease expires on February 21, 2009.
During the first quarter of 2003, the Company paid Randy Pohlman, a member
of its Board of Directors, $40 thousand as a referral fee.
The Company employs Mr. Wamberg's two stepsons, Jason French and Chuck
French. Jason is a consultant with Pearl Meyer & Partners and Chuck is a
consultant with the Executive Benefits Practice. Neither of them reports
directly to Mr. Wamberg.
William Archer, a member of the Company's Board of Directors from February
2001 through November 2004, is a senior policy advisor at Pricewaterhouse
Coopers LLP. The Company previously engaged Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP to
perform various consulting related to the installation of its wide area network
and a knowledge management system at one of its compensation consulting
practices. In addition, Pricewaterhouse Coopers was retained by one of the
Company's practices to perform certain legislative work. During 2004, 2003, and
2002, the Company paid approximately $0, $0, and $380,000, respectively to
Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP for these services.
On February 25, 2002, the Company acquired the Federal Policy Group of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. The purchase price was $11.0 million before
acquisition costs of approximately $28 thousand, consisting of a cash payment at
closing of $5.0 million and $6.0 million of contingent payments all of which was
earned by December 31, 2003 upon attainment of established performance criteria.
Robert Long became a member of the Company's Board of Directors in January
2003 as a result of the LongMiller acquisition. He received a substantial amount
of the proceeds, including a portion of the Company's asset-backed notes from
the Company's November 2002 purchase of LongMiller.
During the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, the Company
received payments of approximately $2.5 million in each year pursuant to an
Administrative Services Agreement and Bonus Forfeiture Agreement with an
affiliate of AUSA Holding, Inc., one of its principal stockholders. See Note 21,
"Supplemental Compensation Arrangements."
In 2003, the Company terminated split dollar policies with four of its
officers.
In 2001, Mr. Wamberg invested $750 thousand in a company of which George
Dalton, a member of the Company's Board of Directors is founder and majority
stockholder.
The Company currently employs a financial planner and an administrative
assistant who perform certain functions and services for Mr. Wamberg's personal
business, in addition to certain services for the Company. Mr. Wamberg
reimburses the Company for the salary, benefits, and bonus for these
individuals.
24. LITIGATION AND CONTINGENCIES
From time to time, the Company is involved in various claims and lawsuits
incidental to its business, including claims and lawsuits alleging breaches of
contractual obligations under agreements with its employee consultants and
independent producers. The following is a summary of the current significant
legal proceedings pending against the Company.
62
CLARK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
WILLIAM L. MACDONALD, SR. V. CLARK/BARDES CONSULTING, INC.
On April 10, 2003, William L. MacDonald, Sr., the former Chairman of the
Executive Benefits Practice, filed suit in Los Angeles, California Superior
Court alleging wrongful termination and seeking damages of $10.1 million and a
declaration that all of his non-competition and non-solicitation provisions were
unenforceable. On April 11, 2003, the Company filed proceedings in the Circuit
Court of Cook County, Illinois to enforce the non-competition and
non-solicitation covenants agreed to by Mr. MacDonald when the Company purchased
Mr. MacDonald's business, Compensation Resource Group, Inc., in September of
2000 and for other relief. In light of the California suit, the Illinois
litigation was stayed pending the outcome of proceeding in the California court.
The Company responded to Mr. MacDonald's suit by requesting the California
court to transfer the matter to arbitration as provided for in several of the
contracts at issue, and to enter a temporary restraining order prohibiting Mr.
MacDonald from competing with the Company and contacting its clients, in aid of
and pending the outcome of the arbitration. On May 1, 2003, the Court granted
the Company's motion and entered a temporary restraining order prohibiting Mr.
MacDonald from contacting certain clients of the Company. On June 5, 2003, the
Court entered a preliminary injunction, which prohibited Mr. MacDonald and
persons acting in concert with him from soliciting clients of the Company's
Executive Benefits Practice. On July 24, 2003, the Court issued its order
granting the Company's Motion to Compel Arbitration. Thereafter, the matter was
settled by the parties. On June 30, 2004, the Arbitration Panel incorporated the
settlement in an Award, which provides that Mr. MacDonald will not solicit and
will do no business with the Company's current Executive Benefits Practice
clients until September 5, 2005.
FRIEDA SHUSTER, ET AL. V. HYDER MIRZA, ET AL. INCLUDING CLARK/BARDES, INC.
On May 30, 2001, the Company was named a defendant in a lawsuit initially
filed in the District Court of LaSalle County, Texas, now in Dallas County,
Texas, alleging gross negligence in connection with the death of an employee
when the private aircraft in which he was traveling on company business crashed.
Damages are unspecified. On February 12, 2004, settlement was reached with the
lead plaintiff. The trial for the remaining plaintiffs began on February 24,
2005. The Company denies any and all claims and allegations in this action and
intends to vigorously defend this matter. The matter, including the settlement,
is covered by existing insurance.
INDEPENDENT SALES PRODUCERS' DISPUTES
In March 2004, two of the Company's independent sales producers exercised
their termination rights under their agreement(s) with the Company. Included in
the Company's consolidated balance sheets is a receivable of approximately $1.4
million from these two producers and their employee related to certain
chargeback commissions to be repaid to the Company from the surrender of
policies in 2003. Upon termination, the producers have disputed the chargeback
and asserted other miscellaneous claims. The producers have filed a motion to
compel arbitration in U.S. District Court in Connecticut, which the Company has
opposed. Further, the Company has filed a claim with the NASD in order to
resolve the chargeback dispute in that forum. While it is not possible to
predict with certainty the outcome of the disputes, the Company does not believe
resolution will have a material adverse effect on its financial position or
results of operations.
BASSETT FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED V. CLARK CONSULTING, INC. (F/K/A
CLARK/BARDES, INC.)
On November, 29, 2004, Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated
("Bassett") filed a civil action against the Company in the United States
District Court for the Western District of Virginia, Danville Division, in which
Bassett alleges, among other things, fraud, professional negligence, breach of
fiduciary duty and breach of contract in connection with a broad-based
corporate-owned life insurance program purchased by Bassett in 1994. The relief
sought by Bassett includes compensatory damages in an unspecified amount in
excess of $3 million, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, and attorneys'
fees. The Company believes it has meritorious defenses to Bassett's claims and
intends to vigorously defend the matter.
63
CLARK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
25. INTERIM FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents a summary of key revenue and expense
statistics for the most recent eight calendar quarters. This information is not
necessarily indicative of results for any full year or for any subsequent
period.
QUARTER ENDED
DEC. SEPT. JUNE MAR. DEC. SEPT. JUNE MAR.
2004 2004 2004 2004 2003 2003 2003 2003
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
TOTAL REVENUE $93,690 $66,692 $70,549 $84,651 $86,181 $77,852 $77,258 $84,638
% of annual 29.7% 21.1% 22.4% 26.8% 26.4% 23.9% 23.7% 26.0%
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES (1)(2) 71,346 58,474 62,513 70,311 72,517 67,358 68,742 72,834
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
OPERATING INCOME $22,344 $ 8,218 $ 8,036 $14,340 $13,664 $10,494 $ 8,516 $11,804
% of revenue 23.8% 12.3% 11.4% 16.9% 15.9% 13.5% 11.0% 13.9%
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
NET INCOME $10,575 $ 1,509 $ 1,661 $ 4,415 $ 4,358 $ 2,751 $ 1,992 $ 3,581
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
Basic Earnings per common share $ 0.57 $ 0.08 $ 0.09 $ 0.24 $ 0.24 $ 0.15 $ 0.11 $ 0.20
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
Diluted Earnings per common
share $ 0.57 $ 0.08 $ 0.09 $ 0.23 $ 0.23 $ 0.15 $ 0.11 $ 0.19
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
- --------------
(1) Includes $7.5 million of expense for HCP reorganization in the fourth
quarter of 2003.
(2) Includes $1.5 million of income for settlement of litigation in the second
quarter of 2003.
64
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
CLARK, INC.
By: /s/ TOM WAMBERG
-------------------------------------
Tom Wamberg
Chief Executive Officer
Date: March 2, 2005
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
/s/ TOM WAMBERG Chairman of the Board and March 2, 2005
- ------------------------------------------ Chief Executive Officer and Director
Tom Wamberg
/s/ JEFFREY W. LEMAJEUR Chief Financial Officer, March 2, 2005
- ------------------------------------------ Principal Accounting Officer
Jeffrey W. Lemajeur
/s/ THOMAS M. PYRA Chief Operating Officer, and March 2, 2005
- ------------------------------------------ Director
Thomas M. Pyra
/s/ RANDOLPH A. POHLMAN Director March 2, 2005
- ------------------------------------------
Randolph A. Pohlman
/s/ L. WILLIAM SEIDMAN Director March 2, 2005
- ------------------------------------------
L. William Seidman
/s/ GEORGE D. DALTON Director March 2, 2005
- ------------------------------------------
George D. Dalton
/s/ STEVEN F. PIAKER Director March 2, 2005
- ------------------------------------------
Steven F. Piaker
/s/ ROBERT LONG Director March 2, 2005
- ------------------------------------------
Robert Long
65
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit
No. Description
- ------- -----------
2.1 Reorganization Agreement, dated as of July 30, 1998, by and among
Clark/Bardes Holdings, Inc., Clark/Bardes, Inc. and the Predecessor
Company (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of our
Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-56799 filed with the
SEC on July 12, 1998).
2.2 Asset Purchase Agreement, dated April l5, 1999, by and among
Clark/Bardes, Inc., Clark/Bardes Holdings, Inc., Phynque, Inc., and
certain stockholders of Phynque, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 2.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 000-24769,
filed with the SEC on April 20, 1999).
2.3 Stock Purchase Agreement, dated June 21, 2000 by and among Clark/Bardes,
Inc. and Clark/Bardes Holdings, Inc. as Purchasers and Pearl Meyer,
Diane Posnak, Steven E. Hall, Rhonda C. Edelman, Claude E. Johnston and
David E. Swinford as Stockholders (Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 2.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 000-24769, filed
with the SEC on July 5, 2000).
2.4 Agreement of Merger and Plan of Reorganization, dated September 6, 2000,
by and among Clark/Bardes Holdings, Inc., and Clark/Bardes Acquisition,
Inc., and Compensation Resource Group, Inc. and William L. MacDonald,
Sr. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of our Current
Report on Form 8-K, File No. 000-24769, filed with the SEC on
September 11, 2000).
2.5 Asset Purchase Agreement, dated March 12, 2001, by and among
Clark/Bardes, Inc., Clark/Bardes Holdings, Inc., Rich, Florin/Solutions,
Inc., Rich, Florin/Solutions Trust and certain stockholders of Rich,
Florin/Solutions, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.8
of our Registration Statement on Form S-3, File No. 333-72232, filed
with the SEC on November 2, 2001).
2.6 Asset Purchase Agreement, dated August 31, 2001, by and among
Clark/Bardes Consulting, Inc., Clark/Bardes, Inc., Lyons Compensation &
Benefits, LLC, and certain stockholders of Lyons Compensation &
Benefits, LLC (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 29 of our
Registration Statement on Form S-3, File No. 333-72232, filed with the
SEC on November 2, 2001).
2.7 Membership Interests Purchase Agreement regarding FTPG LLC, dated
February 25, 2002, by and among Clark/Bardes, Inc., Clark/Bardes
Consulting, Inc. and Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP, Kenneth J. Kies,
Patrick J. Raffaniello and FTPG LLC. (Incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 2.10 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, File No. 001-31256,
filed with the SEC on March 27, 2002).
3.1 Certificate of Incorporation of Clark/Bardes, Inc. (Incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of our Registration Statement on Form S-1,
File No. 333-56799, filed with the SEC on July 12, 1998).
3.2 Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of
Clark/Bardes, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to
Amendment No.1 of our Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No.
333-56799), filed with the SEC on July 27, 1998).
3.3 Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of
Clark/Bardes, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 5 of our
Registration Statement on Form 8-A, filed with the SEC on February 28,
2002).
3.4 Bylaws of Clark/Bardes, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 3.2 of our Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No.
333-56799, filed with the SEC on July 12, 1998).
3.5 Certificate of Designation (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
3.4 of our Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-56799, filed
with the SEC on July 12, 1998).
3.6 Certification of Amendment of the Certification of Incorporation of
Clark/Bardes, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.6 of
our Quarterly report on Form10-Q, File No. 001-31256, filed with the SEC
on August 14, 2002).
66
Exhibit
No. Description
- ------- -----------
4.1 Specimen Certificate for shares of common stock, par value $.01 per
share, of Clark/ Bardes Holdings, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 1 to our Registration Statement on Form
S-1, File No. 333-56799, filed with the SEC on July 27, 1998).
4.2 Rights Agreement, dated as of July 10, 1998, by and between Clark/Bardes
Holdings, Inc. and The Bank of New York (Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 4.4 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No.
000-24769, filed with the SEC on November 16, 1998).
10.1 Clark/Bardes, Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan (Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Registration Statement on Form S-1,
File No. 333-56799, filed with the SEC on July 12, 1998).
10.2 Clark/Bardes Consulting, Inc. Execu-FLEX Benefit Plan, restated
effective as of June 1, 2001(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.2 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, File No. 001-31256, filed with
the SEC on March 27, 2002).
(a) Amendment No. 1 to Clark/Bardes Consulting, Inc. Execu-FLEX Benefit
Plan, effective as of January 1, 2002, (Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, File
No. 001-31256, filed with the SEC on March 27, 2002).
10.3 Administration and Services Agreement, by and between Clark/Bardes, Inc.
and Clark/Bardes Securities, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 of our Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No.
333-56799, filed with the SEC on July 12, 1998).
10.4 Administration and Services Agreement, by and between Clark/Bardes, Inc.
and Clark/Bardes, Inc. of Pennsylvania (Incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.4 of our Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No.
333-56799, filed with the SEC on July 12, 1998).
10.5 Letter of Agreement, dated July 24, 1998, to Great-West, Life Investors
and Nationwide (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.34 of our
Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-56799, filed with the
SEC on July 12, 1998).
10.6 Tax Indemnity Agreement by and between Clark/Bardes Holdings, Inc.,
Clark/Bardes, Inc. and certain former stockholders of the Predecessor
Company (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.28 of our
Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-56799, filed with the
SEC on July 12, 1998).
10.7 Lease Agreement, dated April 24, 1998, by and between Northland Center
Limited Partnership and Clark/Bardes, Inc. (Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.16 of our Registration Statement on Form S-1,
File No. 333-56799, filed with the SEC on July 12, 1998).
10.8 Sublease Agreement, dated as of September 1, 1999, between Clark/Bardes,
Inc. and The Wamberg Organization (Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.49 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 000-24769,
filed with the SEC on November 12, 1999).
10.9 Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan.*
10.10 1998 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 4.7 of our Registration Statement on Form S-8, File
No. 333-68163, filed with the SEC on December 1, 1998).
10.11 Form of Clark/Bardes, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan (Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 4.3 of our Registration Statement on Form S-8, File
No. 333-68982, filed with the SEC on September 5, 2001).
10.12 Employment Agreement dated February 1, 2004, by and between Clark, Inc.
and Thomas M. Pyra. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of
our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 001-31256, filed with the
SEC on May 10, 2004).
67
Exhibit
No. Description
- ------- -----------
10.13 Employment Agreement effective, August 14, 2001, by and between
Clark/Bardes, Inc. and Richard C. Chapman. (Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.14 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, File No.
000-31256, filed with the SEC on March 27, 2002).
10.14 Employment Agreement, dated as of September 1, 1999, by and between
Clark/Bardes Holdings, Inc. and W.T. Wamberg (Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.48 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File
No. 000-24769, filed with the SEC on November 12, 1999).
(a) First Amendment, dated March 6, 2002, to the Employment Agreement
by and between Clark/Bardes Holdings, Inc. and W.T. Wamberg
(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.15 of our Annual
Report on Form 10-K, File No. 001-31256, filed with the SEC on
March 27, 2002).
(b) Second Amendment, dated May 1, 2003, to the Employment Agreement by
and between Clark/Bardes Holdings, Inc., Clark/Bardes Consulting,
Inc. and W.T. Wamberg (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.1(b) of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 001-31256,
filed with the SEC on November 13, 2003).
(c) Third Amendment, dated October 1, 2003, to the Employment Agreement
by and between Clark/Bardes Holdings, Inc., Clark/Bardes
Consulting, Inc. and W.T. Wamberg (Incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.1(c) of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No.
001-31256, filed with the SEC on November 13, 2003).
10.15 Employment Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2004, by and between
Clark, Inc. and James C. Bean (Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No.
001-31256, filed with the SEC on August 5, 2004).
10.16 Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 26,
2003 among Clark, Inc. as Borrower, Bank One Texas, NA, as
Administrative Agent, Certain Financial Institutions as Lenders, and
Bank One Capital Markets, Inc. as Lead Arranger and Sole Book Runner
(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.16 of our Annual Report
on Form 10-K, File No. 001-31256, filed with the SEC on March 12, 2004).
10.17 Promissory Note dated September 6, 2000, by and among Clark/Bardes
Holdings, Inc. and William L. MacDonald, Sr. (Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, File No.
000-24769, filed with the SEC on September 20, 2000).
10.18 Clark/Bardes, Inc. 2002 Stock Option Plan (Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No.
001-31256, filed with the SEC on August 14, 2002).
10.19 Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 25, 2002,
by and among Clark/Bardes, Inc., Clark/Bardes Consulting, Inc., Long,
Miller & Associates, LLC and certain other parties named therein
(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of our Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q, File No. 001-31256, filed with the SEC on November 14,
2002).
10.20 Bonus Forfeiture Agreement, dated as of September 25, 2002, among Life
Investors Insurance Company of America, Transamerica Life Insurance
Company and Clark/Bardes Consulting, Inc. (Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No.
001-31256, filed with the SEC on November 14, 2002).
10.21 Administrative Services Agreement, dated as of September 25, 2002, among
Life Investors Insurance Company of America, Transamerica Life Insurance
Company and Clark/Bardes Consulting, Inc. (Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No.
001-31256, filed with the SEC on November 14, 2002).
10.22 Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2002, by and among
CBC Insurance Revenue Securitization, LLC, Long, Miller & Associates,
LLC, Clark/Bardes Consulting, Inc., BNY Midwest Trust Company and BNY
Asset Solutions LLC (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.23
of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, File No. 001-31256, filed with the
SEC on March 27, 2003).
10.23 Indenture, dated as of October 1, 2002, by and among CBC Insurance
Revenue Securitization, LLC and BNY Midwest Trust Company (Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.24 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K,
File No. 001-31256, filed with the SEC on March 27, 2003).
68
Exhibit
No. Description
- ------- -----------
10.24 Employment Agreement, dated July 16, 2004, between Clark, Inc. and
Jeffrey W. Lemajeur (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2
of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 001-31256, filed with the
SEC on August 5, 2004).
10.25 Employment Agreement, dated March 21, 2003, between Clark/Bardes, Inc.
and Leslie N. Brockhurst.*
21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant*
23.1 Consent of Deloitte and Touche LLP*
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Offer and Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
- ---------------
*filed herewith
69