UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10 - Q

(X) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003

( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number: 000-22683

GABLES REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)

777 Yamato Road, Suite 510
Boca Raton, Florida 33431
  (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(561) 997-9700

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past (90) days.

(X) YES                (  )  NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer
(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)
(X)   YES              (  ) NO

 

GABLES REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
FORM 10-Q INDEX

PART I. – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. – UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited and Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)

                 Unless the context otherwise requires, all references to "we," "our" or "us" in this report refer collectively to Gables Realty Limited Partnership and its subsidiaries.

1.    ORGANIZATION AND FORMATION

        Gables Realty Limited Partnership (the "Operating Partnership") is the entity through which Gables Residential Trust (the "Trust"), a real estate investment trust (a "REIT"), conducts substantially all of its business and owns, either directly or indirectly through subsidiaries, substantially all of its assets. The Trust was formed in 1993 under Maryland law to continue and expand the operations of its privately owned predecessor organization. The Trust completed its initial public offering on January 26, 1994.

       We are a fully integrated real estate company engaged in the multifamily apartment community management, development, construction, acquisition and disposition businesses. We also provide management, development and construction, corporate rental housing and brokerage services to third parties and unconsolidated joint ventures. Substantially all of our third-party management businesses are conducted through a wholly-owned subsidiary, Gables Residential Services.

       As of June 30, 2003, the Trust was an 81.6% economic owner of our common equity. The Trust controls us through Gables GP, Inc. ("Gables GP"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Trust and our sole general partner. This organizational structure is commonly referred to as an umbrella partnership REIT or "UPREIT." The board of directors of Gables GP, the members of which are the same as the members of the Trust's board of trustees, manages our affairs by directing the affairs of Gables GP. The Trust's limited partnership and indirect general partnership interests in us entitle it to share in our cash distributions, and in our profits and losses in proportion to its ownership interest therein and entitles the Trust to vote on all matters requiring a vote of the limited partners. Generally, our other limited partners are persons who contributed their direct or indirect interests in certain of our real estate assets primarily in connection with the IPO and the 1998 acquisition of the real estate assets and operations of Trammell Crow Residential South Florida. We are obligated to redeem each common unit of limited partnership interest ("Units") held by a person other than the Trust at the request of the holder for an amount equal to the fair market value of a share of the Trust's common shares at the time of such redemption, provided that the Trust, at its option, may elect to acquire each Unit presented for redemption for one common share or cash. Such limited partners' redemption rights are reflected in "limited partners' capital interest" in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets at the cash redemption amount at the balance sheet date. The Trust's percentage ownership interest in us will increase with each redemption. In addition, whenever the Trust issues common shares or preferred shares, it is obligated to contribute any net proceeds to us and we are obligated to issue an equivalent number of common or preferred Units with substantially identical rights as the common or preferred shares, as applicable, to the Trust.

       Distributions to holders of Units are made to enable distributions to be made to the Trust's shareholders under its dividend policy. The Trust must currently distribute 90% of its ordinary taxable income to its shareholders. We make distributions to the Trust to enable it to satisfy this requirement.

       As of June 30, 2003, we managed a total of 181 multifamily apartment communities owned by us and our third-party clients comprising 50,429 apartment homes.  At June 30, 2003, we owned 77 stabilized multifamily apartment communities comprising 21,090 apartment homes, an indirect 25% interest in one stabilized apartment community comprising 345 apartment homes, an indirect 20% interest in four stabilized apartment communities comprising 1,215 apartment homes, and an indirect 8.3% interest in three stabilized apartment communities comprising 1,118 apartment homes. We also owned seven multifamily apartment communities under development or in lease-up at June 30, 2003 that are expected to comprise 2,015 apartment homes upon completion and an indirect 20% interest in two apartment communities under development or in lease-up at June 30, 2003 that are expected to comprise 373 apartment homes upon completion. In addition, as of June 30, 2003, we owned a parcel of land on which we intend to develop an apartment community that we currently expect will comprise 450 apartment homes. We also have rights to acquire additional parcels of land on which we believe we could develop communities. Any future development is subject to obtaining permits and other governmental approvals, as well as our ongoing business review, and may not be undertaken or completed.

2. COMMON AND PREFERRED EQUITY ACTIVITY

Secondary Common Share Offerings

       Since the IPO, the Trust has issued a total of 14,831 common shares in eight offerings, generating $347.8 million in net proceeds which were generally used (1) to reduce outstanding indebtedness under our interim financing vehicles utilized to fund our development and acquisition activities and (2) for general working capital purposes, including funding of future development and acquisition activities.

Preferred Share Offerings

       On May 8, 2003, the Trust issued 3,000 shares of 7.5% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares (liquidation preference $25.00 per share). The net proceeds from this issuance of approximately $72.4 million were used to reduce outstanding indebtedness under our interim financing vehicles. The Series D Preferred Shares may be redeemed at the Trust’s option at $25.00 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends on or after May 8, 2008. The Series D Preferred Shares are not subject to any sinking fund or convertible into any other securities of the Trust.

       On September 27, 2002, the Trust issued 1,600 shares of 7.875% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares (liquidation preference $25.00 per share) in a private placement to an institutional investor.  The net proceeds from this issuance of $39.7 million, together with the net proceeds of $39.7 million from the concurrent issuance of $40 million of senior unsecured notes, were used to retire approximately $82.5 million of unsecured indebtedness at an interest rate of 8.3% that was scheduled to mature in December 2002.  The Series C Preferred Shares may be redeemed at the Trust’s option at $25.00 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends on or after September 30, 2006.  The Series C Preferred Shares are not subject to any sinking fund or convertible into any other securities of the Trust.  Pursuant to a registration rights agreement with the purchaser of the Series C Preferred Shares, the Trust agreed to register with the Securities and Exchange Commission a new series of preferred shares, and to offer to exchange those shares for the Series C Preferred Shares.  The dividend rate, preferences and other terms of the new preferred shares, or 7.875% Series C-1 Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, will be identical in all material respects to the Series C Preferred Shares, except that the Series C-1 Preferred Shares will be freely tradable by a holder. The Trust filed an exchange offer registration statement on April 15, 2003. The exchange offer, which commenced August 6, 2003, will not generate any cash proceeds for the Trust and will expire on September 4, 2003, unless extended by the Trust.

       On June 18, 1998, the Trust issued 180 shares of 5.0% Series Z Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares (liquidation preference $25.00 per share) in connection with the acquisition of a parcel of land for future development. The Series Z Preferred Shares, which are subject to mandatory redemption on June 18, 2018, may be redeemed at the Trust’s option at any time for $25.00 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends. The Series Z Preferred Shares are not subject to any sinking fund or convertible into any other securities of the Trust.

       On July 24, 1997, the Trust issued 4,600 shares of 8.30% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares (liquidation preference $25.00 per share). The net proceeds from this offering of $111.0 million were used to reduce outstanding indebtedness under our interim financing vehicles.  The Trust redeemed all outstanding Series A Preferred Shares for $115 million on August 9, 2002 with proceeds from our $180 million senior unsecured note issuance on July 8, 2002.

Issuances of Common Operating Partnership Units

       Since the IPO, we have issued a total of 4,421 Units in connection with the 1998 acquisition of the real estate assets and operations of Trammell Crow Residential South Florida, the acquisition of other operating apartment communities and the acquisition of a parcel of land for future development. 

Issuance of Preferred Operating Partnership Units

       On November 12, 1998, we issued 2,000 of our 8.625% Series B Preferred Units to an institutional investor. The net proceeds from this issuance of $48.7 million were used to reduce outstanding indebtedness under our interim financing vehicles. The Trust has the option to redeem the Series B Preferred Units after November 14, 2003 at $25.00 per Unit plus accrued and unpaid dividends. These Units are exchangeable by the holder into 8.625% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of the Trust on a one-for-one basis; however, this exchange right is generally not exercisable until after November 14, 2008. The Series B Preferred Units have no stated maturity, sinking fund or mandatory redemption.

Common Equity Repurchase Program

       We have a common equity repurchase program pursuant to which the Trust is authorized to purchase up to $200 million of its outstanding common shares or Units.  We view the repurchase of common equity with consideration of other investment alternatives when capital is available to be deployed.  The Trust has repurchased shares from time to time in open market and privately negotiated transactions, depending on market prices and other conditions, using proceeds from sales of selected assets. Whenever the Trust repurchases common shares from shareholders, we are required to redeem from the Trust an equivalent number of Units on the same terms and for the same aggregate price. After redemption, the Units redeemed by us are no longer deemed outstanding.  We have also repurchased Units for cash upon their presentation for redemption by unitholders. As of June 30, 2003, we had redeemed 4,806 Units, including 4,506 Units redeemed by the Trust, for a total of $116.0 million, including $0.2 million in related commissions.

Shelf Registration Statement

       The Trust has an effective shelf registration statement on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission which initially provided $500 million of equity capacity.   The Trust currently has $425 million of this equity capacity remaining following its May 2003 preferred equity offering.

3. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

       The accompanying consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and include the consolidated accounts of the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries, including Gables Residential Services. We consolidate the financial statements of all entities in which we have a controlling financial interest, as that term is defined under GAAP, through either majority voting interest or contractual agreements. Our investments in non-controlled joint ventures are accounted for using the equity method.  All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

       The accompanying interim unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP for interim financial information and in conjunction with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In our opinion, all adjustments (consisting only of normally recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation for these interim periods have been included. The results of operations for the interim period ended June 30, 2003 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements included in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.

       Certain amounts in the 2002 financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2003 presentation.

4.  PORTFOLIO AND OTHER FINANCING ACTIVITY

Community Dispositions Subject to Discontinued Operations Reporting

       In February 2003, we sold an apartment community located in Dallas comprising 300 apartment homes.  The net proceeds from this sale were $18.7 million and were used to pay down outstanding borrowings under our interim financing vehicles. The gain from the sale of this community was $5.0 million and was recognized in the first quarter of 2003.

       During 2002, we sold two apartment communities located in Houston comprising 660 apartment homes. The net proceeds from these sales were $43.2 million and were used to pay down outstanding borrowings under our interim financing vehicles and purchase common shares and Units under our common equity repurchase program. The aggregate gain from the sale of these two communities was $9.8 million.  One of these sales occurred during the first quarter of 2002, resulting in a $2.2 million gain.  The other sale occurred during the fourth quarter of 2002.

       Historical operating results and gains are reflected as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.  See Notes 5 and 6 for further discussion.

Community and Land Dispositions Not Subject to Discontinued Operations Reporting

       During 2002, we sold a 13.3 acre parcel of land in Houston that was adjacent to an apartment community sold, an apartment community located in Houston comprising 246 apartment homes and an apartment community located in Atlanta comprising 311 apartment homes. The net proceeds from these sales were $46.8 million and were used to pay down outstanding borrowings under our interim financing vehicles and purchase common shares and Units under our common equity repurchase program. The gain from the land sale was $0.8 million and the aggregate gain from the sale of the two communities was $17.9 million.  All of these sale transactions occurred during the first quarter of 2002. In addition, we recognized $1.3 million of deferred gain during the year ended December 31, 2002 associated with prior year sale transactions, of which $0.5 million and $1.0 million were recognized during the three months and six months, respectively, ended June 30, 2002.

       During 2002, the Gables Residential Apartment Portfolio JV (the "GRAP JV") sold two apartment communities located in South Florida comprising 610 apartment homes, an apartment community in Dallas comprising 222 apartment homes and an apartment community located in Houston comprising 382 apartment homes. Our share of the net sales proceeds after repayment of construction loan indebtedness of $46.7 million was $10.7 million, resulting in a gain of $2.6 million.  Two of these sales occurred during the first quarter of 2002, resulting in a $1.8 million gain to us.  The other two sales occurred during the third quarter of 2002.

       Historical operating results and gains are included in continuing operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.  See Notes 5 and 6 for further discussion.

Community Acquisitions

       On July 15, 2003, we acquired an apartment community located in Washington, D.C. comprising 211 apartment homes for approximately $53.0 million in cash.  The acquisition was financed through borrowings under our interim financing vehicles.

       On May 30, 2003, we acquired an apartment community located in Dallas comprising 334 apartment homes for approximately $33.5 million in cash.  The acquisition was financed through borrowings under our interim financing vehicles.

       On February 20, 2003, we acquired an apartment community located in Austin that is subject to a long-term ground lease and is comprised of 239 apartment homes and 7,366 square feet of retail space for approximately $30.2 million in cash.  The acquisition was financed through borrowings under our interim financing vehicles.

Other Acquisitions

        In May 2003, we acquired property management contracts for 10,684 apartment homes in 32 multifamily apartment communities from Archstone-Smith (the “Archstone Management Business”).  The management and accounting services rendered under the acquired management contracts are transitioning to us over a 3-month period.  The purchase price of approximately $6.5 million is structured to be paid in three installments based on the retention of the contracts acquired.  As of June 30, 2003, we had funded $2.2 million of the $6.5 million purchase price.

       In May 2001, we acquired a property management company based in Washington, D.C. that managed approximately 3,600 apartment homes in 24 multifamily apartment communities located in Washington, D.C. and the surrounding area (the "D.C. Management Co.").  Our total investment of approximately $1.6 million was structured to be paid in three installments based on results of the acquired business operations.  As of June 30, 2003, we had funded all of the $1.6 million total investment. 
      
Senior Unsecured Note Issuance

       On September 27, 2002, we issued $40 million of senior unsecured notes in two series in a private placement to an institutional investor: $30 million at an interest rate of 5.86% maturing in September 2009 and $10 million at an interest rate of 6.10% maturing in September 2010. The net proceeds of $39.7 million, together with the net proceeds of $39.7 million from the concurrent issuance by the Trust of the 7.875% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, were used to retire approximately $82.5 million of senior unsecured notes at an interest rate of 8.3% that were scheduled to mature in December 2002. We did not incur any prepayment costs in connection with the early debt retirement.  Pursuant to a registration rights agreement with the purchaser of the $40 million of senior unsecured notes, we agreed to register with the Securities and Exchange Commission new notes, and to offer to exchange those new notes for the original notes.  The new notes, also to be issued in two series, will be in the same aggregate principal amount as, and will be identical in all material respects to the original 5.86% notes due 2009 and the 6.10% notes due 2010, except that the new notes will be freely tradable by a holder. We filed an exchange offer registration statement on April 15, 2003. The exchange offer, which commenced August 6, 2003, will not generate any cash proceeds for us and will expire on September 4, 2003, unless extended by us.

       On July 8, 2002, we issued $180 million of senior unsecured notes which bear interest at a rate of 5.75%, were priced to yield 5.81% and mature in July 2007. The net proceeds of $178 million were used to redeem all of the Trust’s outstanding shares of the 8.3% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares totaling $115 million on August 9, 2002 and to reduce borrowings under our interim financing vehicles.

Debt Refinancing

       In May 2002, we called $48.4 million of secured tax-exempt bond indebtedness with an interest rate of 6.375% and re-issued the bonds on an unsecured basis at a fixed interest rate of 4.75%. In connection with the early extinguishment of debt, we incurred a prepayment penalty of $1,451 and wrote-off unamortized deferred financing costs totaling $236. Such charges totaling $1,687 were originally reflected as an extraordinary loss in the statements of operations in accordance with accounting rules in effect at that time.  In connection with the adoption of SFAS No. 145 (Note 5) we reclassified the charges totaling $1,687 to “unusual items” within continuing operations.  The called bonds required monthly principal amortization payments that were retained in an escrow account and were not applied to reduce the outstanding principal balance of the loan. Such principal payments held in escrow totaling $4,121 were released in May 2002. This refinancing transaction allowed us to improve our debt constant by 2.75%, unencumber six communities comprising 2,028 apartment homes and achieve a positive net present value result.

5. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

       In June 2001, SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," (effective for us January 1, 2002) was issued. SFAS No. 142 specifies that goodwill and some intangible assets will no longer be amortized but instead will be subject to periodic impairment testing. The adoption of SFAS No. 142 did not have a significant impact on our financial statements.

       In August 2001, SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations," (effective for us January 1, 2003) was issued. SFAS No. 143 requires that entities recognize the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The adoption of SFAS No. 143 did not have a significant impact on our financial statements.

        In August 2001, SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets," (effective for us January 1, 2002) was issued. SFAS No. 144 addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment of long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of. The statement supersedes SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of," and among other factors, establishes criteria beyond that previously specified in SFAS No. 121 to determine when a long-lived asset is to be considered as held for sale. The impairment provisions of SFAS No. 144 are similar to SFAS No. 121 and the adoption thereof did not have a significant impact on our financial statements.  As discussed further in Note 6, SFAS No. 144 also requires that the gains and losses from the disposition of certain real estate assets and the related historical operating results be reflected as discontinued operations in the statements of operations for all periods presented.   We redeploy capital through the re-investment of asset disposition proceeds into our business in order to enhance total returns to unitholders. Although net income is not affected, we expect to continue to reclassify results previously included in continuing operations to discontinued operations for any future qualifying dispositions in accordance with SFAS No. 144.   
     
         In April 2002, SFAS No. 145, "Rescission of SFAS Nos. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of SFAS No. 13, and Technical Corrections," was issued.  SFAS No. 145 (effective for us January 1, 2003), among other things, eliminates the requirement that all gains and losses from the extinguishment of debt be aggregated and, if material, classified as an extraordinary item. However, a gain or loss arising from such an event or transaction would continue to be classified as an extraordinary item if the event or transaction is both unusual in nature and infrequent in occurrence per the criteria in APB No. 30, "Reporting the Results of Operations - Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions."  As part of the transition guidance, although net income would not be affected, gains and losses from debt extinguishment in prior periods that do not meet the criteria in APB No. 30 must be reclassified to continuing operations for all periods presented.  We adopted SFAS No. 145 in the first quarter of 2003 and, as a result, reclassified our May 2002 extraordinary loss on early extinguishment of debt of $1.7 million to “unusual items” within continuing operations.  This loss on early extinguishment of debt is related to the re-issuance of $48.4 million of tax-exempt bond indebtedness (Note 4).  

          In June 2002, SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities," was issued. SFAS No. 146 requires the recording of costs associated with exit or disposal activities at their fair values when a liability has been incurred. Under previous guidance, certain exit costs were accrued upon management's commitment to an exit plan, which is generally before an actual liability has been incurred. Adoption of SFAS No. 146 is to be applied prospectively to exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. The adoption of SFAS No. 146 did not have a significant impact on our financial statements.

         In November 2002, FIN 45, "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others," was issued.  FIN 45 elaborates on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued (Note 10).  It also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee.  We will apply the initial recognition and initial measurement provisions of FIN 45 on a prospective basis for any guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002.  The adoption of FIN 45 did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

       In December 2002, SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure," was issued.  SFAS No. 148 amends SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," to provide alternative methods for transition for an entity that voluntarily changes to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation.  It also amends the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosure in both interim and annual financial statements about the effects on reported net income of an entity's accounting policy decisions with respect to stock-based employee compensation.  We adopted this standard effective for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, resulting in additional disclosures related to the Trust’s stock-based compensation plan (Note 9).  We began expensing stock-based employee compensation under the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 on a prospective basis beginning January 1, 2003.  Due to the Trust’s limited use of options as a form of compensation since 1999, the adoption of this accounting standard did not have a significant impact on our financial statements.

       In January 2003, FIN 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities," was issued.  In general, a variable interest entity ("VIE") is an entity that either (a) does not have equity investors with voting rights or (b) has equity investors that do not provide sufficient financial resources for the entity to support its activities.  Until now, a company generally has only consolidated another entity in its financial statements if it controlled the entity through voting interests.  FIN 46 changes that by requiring a VIE to be consolidated by a company if that company is subject to a majority of the risk of loss from the VIE's activities or is entitled to receive a majority of the entity's residual returns or both.  The provisions of FIN 46 are to be applied effective immediately for VIEs created after January 31, 2003, and effective July 1, 2003 for VIEs created prior to February 1, 2003.  If it is reasonably possible that an enterprise will consolidate or disclose information about a VIE when FIN 46 becomes effective, the enterprise should make certain disclosures in all financial statements initially issued after January 31, 2003, regardless of the date on which the VIE was created.  We do not believe that it is reasonably possible that the adoption of FIN 46 will result in the consolidation of any previously unconsolidated entities.

       In July 2003, EITF Abstracts, Topic No. D-42, "The Effect on the Calculation of Earnings per Share for the Redemption or Induced Conversion of Preferred Stock," was clarified. Topic No. D-42 requires that the excess of (1) fair value of the consideration transferred to the holders of preferred stock over (2) the carrying amount of the preferred stock in the balance sheet should be subtracted from net earnings to arrive at net earnings available to common shareholders in the calculation of earnings per share. In July 2003, it was clarified that the carrying amount of the preferred stock should be reduced by the issuance costs of the preferred stock, regardless of where in the stockholders' equity section those costs were initially classified upon issuance. This clarification of Topic No. D-42 is required to be reflected retroactively in the first fiscal period ending after September 15, 2003, by restating the financial statements of prior periods in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 27-30 of APB Opinion No. 20, “Accounting Changes.” The Trust redeemed its Series A Preferred Shares in August 2002 and in accordance with this clarification, we will subtract the $4.0 million excess of the fair value of the redemption price over the carrying value of the Series A Preferred Shares in arriving at net earnings available to common unitholders in the calculation of earnings per Unit for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. We will also apply the provisions of Topic No. D-42 to any future redemptions of preferred stock.

6.  DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

        We adopted SFAS No. 144 effective January 1, 2002 which requires, among other things, that the operating results of certain real estate assets which have been sold subsequent to January 1, 2002, or otherwise qualify as held for disposition (as defined by SFAS No. 144), be reflected as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented. We sold three wholly-owned operating real estate assets during the first quarter of 2002, one wholly-owned operating real estate asset during the fourth quarter of 2002 and one wholly-owned operating real estate asset during the first quarter of 2003. We retained management of two of the assets sold during the first quarter of 2002. Due to our continuing involvement with the operations of the two assets sold that we retained management of, the operating results of these assets are included in continuing operations. The operating results for the three remaining wholly-owned assets sold during the first and fourth quarters of 2002 and first quarter of 2003 for which we did not retain management are reflected as discontinued operations in the accompanying statements of operations for all periods presented. Interest expense has been allocated to the results of the discontinued operations in accordance with EITF No. 87-24. We had no assets that qualified as held for disposition as defined by SFAS No. 144 at June 30, 2003 or December 31, 2002.

      Condensed financial information of the results of operations for the real estate assets sold reflected as discontinued operations is as follows:

	Three Months     . Ended June 30,    .				Six Months       Ended June 30,
	2003		2002		2003		2002
Total property revenues	$         -		$1,629		$  223		$3,487
Property operating and maintenance expense     (exclusive of items shown separately below) Real estate asset depreciation and amortization Interest expense    Total expenses	-        -             -           -		668 324     170   1,162		148 49       36     233		1,394 709       366 2,469
Operating income (loss) from discontinued operations	-		467		(10	)	1,018
Gain on disposition of discontinued operations	-		-		5,042		2,198
Income from discontinued operations	$         -		$467		$5,032		$3,216

7.   EARNINGS PER UNIT

       Basic earnings per Unit are computed based on net income available to common unitholders and the weighted average number of common Units outstanding. Diluted earnings per Unit reflect the assumed issuance of common Units under the Trust’s share option and incentive plan. The numerator and denominator used for both basic and diluted earnings per Unit computations are as follows:

	Three Months     .     Ended June 30,    .				Six Months    Ended June 30,
Basic and diluted income available to common unitholders (numerator):	2003		2002		2003		2002
Income from continuing operations (net of preferred distributions) -    basic and diluted Income from discontinued operations – basic and diluted Net income available to common unitholders – basic and diluted Common Units (denominator): Average Units outstanding – basic Incremental Units from assumed conversions of:    Stock options    Other Average Units outstanding – diluted	$5,406 $        - $5,406 30,416 95         9 30,520		$5,552 $     467 $ 6,019 30,762 163          6 30,931		$11,813 $  5,032 $16,845 30,359 61          9 30,429		$34,848 $  3,216 $38,064 30,634 162          6 30,802

8.  SEGMENT REPORTING

       Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. Our chief operating decision maker is our senior management group.

       We own, operate and develop multifamily apartment communities in major markets located in Texas, Georgia, Florida, Washington, D.C. and Tennessee. Such apartment communities generate rental revenue and other income through the leasing of apartment homes to a diverse base of residents.  The operating performance of each of our communities is affected by the supply and demand dynamics within the immediate submarket or neighborhood of the major market that each such community is located in.  We evaluate the performance of each of our apartment communities on an individual basis. However, because each of our apartment communities has similar economic characteristics, residents, and products and services, our apartment communities have been aggregated into one reportable segment. This segment comprises 94% and 93% of our total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and 94% and 93% of our total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

      The primary financial measure for our reportable business segment is net operating income ("NOI"), which represents total property revenues less property operating and maintenance expenses.  Property operating and maintenance expenses represent direct property operating and maintenance expenses as reflected in our accompanying statements of operations and exclude certain expenses included in the determination of net income such as property management and other indirect operating expenses, interest expense and depreciation and amortization expense.  These items are excluded from NOI in order to provide results that are more closely related to a property’s results of operations.  NOI is also used by industry analysts and investors to measure operating performance of our apartment communities. Current year NOI is compared to prior year NOI and current year budgeted NOI as a measure of financial performance. The NOI yield or return on total capitalized costs is an additional measure of financial performance. NOI from our wholly-owned apartment communities included in continuing operations is as follows:

	Three Months    . . Ended June 30,    .				Six Months     .    Ended June 30,   .
	2003		2002		2003	2002
Total property revenues Less:  Property operating and maintenance expenses	$57,067   20,439		$54,155   19,245		$113,534    40,208	$109,514       37,875
Net operating income (NOI)	$36,628		$34,910		$73,326	$  71,639

      Below is a reconciliation of NOI to income from continuing operations before equity in income of joint ventures and gain on sale (this caption in the accompanying statements of operations is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to NOI).

	Three Months     . Ended June 30,   .				Six Months      . Ended June 30,.
	2003		2002		2003		2002
Net operating income (NOI)	$36,628		$34,910		$73,326		$71,639
Less other expenses:
Real estate asset depreciation and amortization	(12,763	)	(11,881	)	(25,779	)	(23,534	)
Property management – owned	(  1,697	)	(  1,489	)	(  3,357	)	(  3,398	)
Property management – third party	(  1,947	)	(  1,619	)	(  3,773	)	(  3,344	)
Ancillary services	(  1,085	)	(  1,308	)	(   2,310	)	(  2,779	)
Interest expense and credit enhancement fees	(11,410	)	(10,029	)	(22,889	)	(20,148	)
Amortization of deferred financing costs	(     482	)	(    275	)	(    906	)	(     532	)
General and administrative	(  2,272	)	( 1,753	)	( 4,605	)	(  3,675	)
Corporate asset depreciation and amortization	(     482	)	(    428	)	(    824	)	(     881	)
Unusual items	-		( 1,687	)	-		(  1,687	)
Total other expenses	(32,138	)	(30,469	)	(64,443	)	(59,978	)
Add other revenues:
Property management revenues	1,951		1,857		3,800		3,672
Ancillary services revenues	1,453		2,110		3,326		4,655
Interest income	88		120		161		181
Other revenues	74		42		120		85
Total other revenues	3,566		4,129		7,407		8,593
Income from continuing operations before equity in    income of  joint ventures and gain on sale	$8,056		$  8,570		$16,290		$ 20,254

        All other measurements for our reportable segment are disclosed in our consolidated financial statements.

         We also provide management, development and construction, corporate apartment home and brokerage services to third parties and unconsolidated joint ventures. These operations, on an individual and aggregate basis, do not meet the quantitative thresholds for segment reporting set forth in SFAS No. 131.

9.  STOCK OPTIONS

       Beginning January 1, 2003, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148, for stock-based employee compensation.  Under the prospective method of adoption selected by us, the recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 apply to all new employee option awards granted by the Trust after December 31, 2002.  Prior option awards will continue to be accounted for under APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” under which no compensation cost has been recognized since all options have been granted with an exercise price equal to the fair value of the Trust’s common shares on the date of grant.  Had compensation cost on all outstanding and unvested option awards been determined consistent with SFAS No. 123, our net income and earnings per Unit would have been reduced to the following pro forma amounts:

	Three Months   Ended June 30,					Six Months    .   Ended June 30,
	2003			2002		2003		2002
Net income available to common unitholders, as reported Deduct:  Total stock-based employee compensation expense    determined under fair value based method for all option awards Net income available to common unitholders, pro forma Earnings per Unit:      Basic – as reported      Basic – pro forma      Diluted – as reported      Diluted – pro forma	$5,406 (       11 $ 5,395 $0.18 $0.18 $0.18 $0.18	)		$6,019 (      96 $ 5,923 $0.20 $0.19 $0.19 $0.19	)	$16,845 (      27 $16,818 $0.55 $0.55 $0.55 $0.55	)	$38,064 (    203 $37,861 $1.24 $1.24 $1.24 $1.23	)

10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Development and Construction Commitments

       We currently have seven communities under development that are expected to comprise 2,015 apartment homes upon completion and an indirect 20% ownership interest in two development communities that are expected to comprise 373 apartment homes upon completion.  The estimated costs to complete the development of these assets total $104 million at June 30, 2003, including $1 million of costs that we are obligated to fund for the co-investment development communities.  These costs are expected to be initially funded by $32 million in construction loan proceeds and $72 million in borrowings under our credit facilities.

       We have letter of credit and performance obligations of approximately $10.7 million related to our wholly-owned development and construction activities.  As the related development and construction activities are completed, such obligations will be reduced accordingly.

       We are currently serving as general contractor for the construction of four apartment communities for third parties and unconsolidated joint ventures under "cost plus a fee" contracts with guaranteed maximum prices on the costs of construction of approximately $65 million in aggregate.  The construction of these assets was 60% complete in aggregate at June 30, 2003.  Under these contracts, we are obligated to fund any construction cost overruns that are not recovered through a change order.  In addition, we are entitled to a share of the savings generated under these contracts, if any, in the form of an incentive fee.  We are also providing general contractor or construction management services for several construction projects related to existing apartment communities owned by third parties.  There are no guaranteed maximum prices on the costs of construction for these projects.  Because our clients are obligated to fund the costs that are incurred on their behalf pursuant to the related contracts, we net the reimbursement of these costs against the billings for such costs.  Development and construction fees are recognized when earned using the percentage of completion method. During the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, we recognized $0.4 million and $0.5 million, respectively, in development and construction fees under related contracts with gross billings of $8.1 million and $9.5 million, respectively.   During the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, we recognized $1.0 million and $1.3 million, respectively, in development and construction fees under related contracts with gross billings of $19.5 million and $22.3 million, respectively.  Such development and construction fees are included in ancillary services revenues in the accompanying statements of operations.

Ground Leases

      We are party to two long-term ground leases for two apartment communities in Austin with initial terms expiring in 2044 and 2065. We have paid the ground lease rent in full for these leases through the initial term. The prepaid lease payments, net of accumulated amortization, are included in other assets, net in the accompanying balance sheets. We are party to long-term ground leases for an apartment community in Atlanta and an apartment community in Austin with initial terms expiring in 2075 and 2069, respectively. The payments under the Atlanta lease and the Austin lease are made on a monthly and quarterly basis, respectively. Future minimum lease payments and rent expense for these ground leases are not material.

Joint Venture Indebtedness and Related Recourse Guarantee Obligations

     The apartment community owned and operated by the Arbors of Harbortown JV in which we have a 25% ownership interest is secured by a $16.4 million tax-exempt bond obligation which bears interest at a low-floater rate.  The credit enhancement for the bond obligation is provided by our venture partner and expires in May 2006.  The maturity date of the underlying bond issue is April 2013.   None of the bond indebtedness is recourse to us.
     The apartment community owned by the GRAP JV in which we have a 20% ownership interest is secured by a construction loan which matures in March 2004.  As of June 30, 2003, there was $24.6 million of indebtedness outstanding under this construction loan which currently bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.5%.  None of this indebtedness is recourse to us.

     Each of the five communities owned by the Gables Residential Apartment Portfolio JV Two (the “GRAP JV Two”) is secured by a construction loan.  The construction loans have initial maturity dates ranging from April 2004 to June 2005, with various extension options.  As of June 30, 2003, there was an aggregate of $61.2 million of indebtedness outstanding under these construction loans which currently bear interest at spreads over LIBOR ranging from 1.45% to 1.70%.  We have a limited payment guaranty on two of these construction loans with committed fundings aggregating $21.3 million.  Pursuant to the guaranty, we are obligated to pay to the lender a stipulated percentage of all amounts of principal, interest and any other indebtedness becoming due and payable on the loans that is not paid by the borrower, subject to a maximum guaranteed amount of $7.2 million.  At June 30, 2003, there is $15.1 million of principal outstanding under these loans and the portion of this principal that is recourse to us is $5.6 million.  These loans have initial maturity dates of October 2004 and June 2005 and have two extension options that if exercised would result in final maturity dates of April 2007 and June 2007, respectively.  There are no principal amortization requirements through the initial maturity dates.  The inability of the venture to pay any principal or interest under these loans when due would require us to perform under this guaranty obligation.  To the extent we are required to make a payment to the lender under the guaranty agreement, our venture partner would be obligated to pay us its share of that payment based on its ownership interest percentage in the venture.  We have not recorded a liability on our accompanying consolidated balance sheets in connection with this recourse obligation.

     Each of the three communities owned by the CMS Tennessee Multifamily JV is secured by a conventional fixed-rate loan with a maturity of January 2011.  As of June 30, 2003, there was an aggregate of $51.9 million of indebtedness outstanding under these loans which bear interest at a rate of 7.22%.  None of this indebtedness is recourse to us.

Office Leases

     We are party to operating leases for office space with various terms. Future minimum lease payments and rent expense for such leases are not material.

Archstone Management Business Acquisition

        In May 2003, we acquired property management contracts for 10,684 apartment homes in 32 multifamily apartment communities from Archstone-Smith.   The purchase price of approximately $6.5 million is structured to be paid in three installments based on the retention of the contracts acquired.  As of June 30, 2003, we had funded $2.2 million of the $6.5 million purchase price.

Contingencies

      We are subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arose in the ordinary course of business.  We believe that these matters are generally covered by insurance. While the resolution of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, we believe that the final outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial statements.

11.  UNUSUAL ITEMS

       Unusual items of $1,687 in 2002 represent the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs of $236 and a prepayment penalty of $1,451 associated with the early retirement of $48,365 of secured tax-exempt bond indebtedness.  Under accounting rules in effect at that time, these costs were classified as an extraordinary item.  In connection with the adoption of SFAS No. 145 on January 1, 2003, these costs were reclassified from extraordinary items to unusual items (Notes 4 and 5).  These bonds had an interest rate of 6.375% which we were able to re-issue on an unsecured basis at a rate of 4.75%, resulting in a positive net present value.

ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)

All references to "we," "our" or "us" refer collectively to Gables Realty Limited Partnership and its subsidiaries.

       We are the entity through which Gables Residential Trust (the "Trust"), a real estate investment trust (a "REIT"), conducts substantially all of its business and owns, either directly or indirectly through subsidiaries, substantially all of its assets. We are focused within the multifamily industry in demand-driven markets throughout the United States that have exhibited high job growth and resiliency to economic downturns. Our operating performance is based predominantly on net operating income (NOI) from our apartment communities.  NOI, which represents total property revenues less property operating and maintenance expenses (as reflected in the consolidated statements of operations), is affected by the demand and supply dynamics within our markets.  See Note 8, Segment Reporting, to the accompanying financial statements for further discussion of our use of NOI as the primary financial measure of performance for our apartment communities. Our performance is also affected by the general availability and cost of capital and our ability to develop and acquire additional apartment communities with returns in excess of our long-term weighted average cost of capital.

Business Objective and Strategies

       The Trust’s objective is to increase shareholder value by producing consistent high quality earnings to sustain dividends and annual total returns that exceed the NAREIT Apartment Index. To achieve that objective, we employ a number of business strategies. First, our long-term investment strategy is research-driven, with the objective of creating a portfolio of high quality assets in strategically selected markets that are complementary through economic diversity and characterized by high job growth and resiliency to national economic downturns. We believe such a portfolio will provide predictable operating cash flow performance that exceeds the national average on a sustainable basis. Second, we adhere to a strategy of owning and operating high quality, class AA/A apartment communities under the Gables brand in Established Premium Neighborhoods,™ or EPNs. EPNs are generally characterized as areas with the highest prices for single-family homes on a per square foot basis. We believe that such communities, when located in EPNs and supplemented with high quality service and amenities, attract the affluent renter-by-choice who is willing to pay a premium for location preference, superior service and high quality communities. The resulting portfolio should maintain high levels of occupancy and rental rates relative to overall market conditions. This, coupled with more predictable operating expenses and reduced capital expenditure requirements associated with high quality construction materials, should lead to operating margins that exceed national averages for the apartment sector and sustainable growth in operating cash flow. Third, our aim is to be recognized as the employer of choice within the industry. Our mission of Taking Care of the Way People Live® involves innovative human resource practices that we believe will attract and retain the highest caliber associates. Because of our long-established presence as a fully integrated apartment management, development, construction, acquisition and disposition company within our markets, we have the ability to offer multi-faceted career opportunities among the various disciplines within the industry. Finally, our capital strategy is to generate a return on invested capital that exceeds our long-term weighted average cost of capital while maintaining financial flexibility through a conservative, investment grade credit profile. We judiciously manage our capital and we redeploy capital through the reinvestment of asset disposition proceeds into our business.

      We believe we are well positioned to continue achieving our objectives because (1) the markets we have selected for investment are projected to continue to experience job growth that exceed national averages, (2) our EPN locations are expected to outperform local market results and (3) national demand for apartments is expected to increase during the next ten to fifteen years as the demographic group referred to as the Echo Boomer generation begins to form new households.

       Rental rates have declined slightly as a result of national economic weakness and low mortgage rates, but the execution of our operating tactics have resulted in occupancy levels that have returned to historically high levels.  We expect total property revenues on a same-store basis in 2003 to be slightly lower than 2002 results.  In addition, we expect property operating and maintenance expenses on a same-store basis for 2003 to increase over 2002 at a rate approximating inflation.  Operating fundamentals for our business are expected to improve as job growth improves in our markets.  The job growth prospects for our markets are partially related to national economic conditions.  It is uncertain whether, and to what extent, the national economy and related job growth will improve in 2003.

      We evaluate, in the ordinary course of our business, the continued ownership of our assets relative to available opportunities to acquire and develop new assets and relative to available equity and debt capital financing.  We sell assets if we determine that such sales are the most attractive sources of capital for redeployment in our business, for repayment of debt, for repurchase of stock and for other uses. We maintain staffing levels sufficient to meet our existing development, construction, acquisition and property operating activities. When market conditions warrant, we adjust staffing levels in an attempt to mitigate a negative impact on our results of operations.

Forward-Looking Statements

       This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws.  Actual results or developments could differ materially from those projected in such statements as a result of the risk factors set forth under “Certain Factors Affecting Future Operating Results” in this Item 2 and elsewhere in this report. The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.

Common and Preferred Equity Activity

Secondary Common Share Offerings

       Since the initial public offering in January 1994, the Trust has issued a total of 14,831 common shares in eight offerings, generating $347.8 million in net proceeds which were generally used (1) to reduce outstanding indebtedness under our interim financing vehicles utilized to fund our development and acquisition activities and (2) for general working capital purposes, including funding of future development and acquisition activities.

Preferred Share Offerings

       On May 8, 2003, the Trust issued 3,000 shares of 7.5% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares (liquidation preference $25.00 per share). The net proceeds from this issuance of approximately $72.4 million were used to reduce outstanding indebtedness under our interim financing vehicles. The Series D Preferred Shares may be redeemed at the Trust’s option at $25.00 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends on or after May 8, 2008. The Series D Preferred Shares are not subject to any sinking fund or convertible into any other securities of the Trust.

      On September 27, 2002, the Trust issued 1,600 shares of 7.875% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares (liquidation preference $25.00 per share) in a private placement to an institutional investor. The net proceeds from this issuance of $39.7 million, together with the net proceeds of $39.7 million from the concurrent issuance of $40 million of senior unsecured notes, were used to retire approximately $82.5 million of unsecured indebtedness at an interest rate of 8.3% that was scheduled to mature in December 2002. The Series C Preferred Shares may be redeemed at the Trust’s option at $25.00 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends on or after September 30, 2006. The Series C Preferred Shares are not subject to any sinking fund or convertible into any other securities of the Trust.  Pursuant to a registration rights agreement with the purchaser of the Series C Preferred Shares, the Trust agreed to register with the Securities and Exchange Commission a new series of preferred shares, and to offer to exchange those shares for the Series C Preferred Shares.  The dividend rate, preferences and other terms of the new preferred shares, or 7.875% Series C-1 Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, will be identical in all material respects to the Series C Preferred Shares, except that the Series C-1 Preferred Shares will be freely tradable by a holder. The Trust filed an exchange offer registration statement on April 15, 2003. The exchange offer, which commenced August 6, 2003, will not generate any cash proceeds for the Trust and will expire on September 4, 2003, unless extended by the Trust.

       On June 18, 1998, the Trust issued 180 shares of 5.0% Series Z Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares (liquidation preference $25.00 per share) in connection with the acquisition of a parcel of land for future development. The Series Z Preferred Shares, which are subject to mandatory redemption on June 18, 2018, may be redeemed at our option at any time for $25.00 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends. The Series Z Preferred Shares are not subject to any sinking fund or convertible into any other securities of the Trust.

       On July 24, 1997, the Trust issued 4,600 shares of 8.30% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares (liquidation preference $25.00 per share). The net proceeds from this offering of $111 million were used to reduce outstanding indebtedness under our interim financing vehicles. The Trust redeemed all outstanding Series A Preferred Shares for $115 million on August 9, 2002 with the proceeds from our $180 million senior unsecured note issuance on July 8, 2002.

Issuances of Common Operating Partnership Units

        Since the IPO, we have issued a total of 4,421 Units in connection with the 1998 acquisition of the real estate assets and operations of Trammell Crow Residential South Florida, the acquisition of other operating apartment communities and the acquisition of a parcel of land for future development.

Issuance of Preferred Operating Partnership Units

       On November 12, 1998, we issued 2,000 of our 8.625% Series B Preferred Units to an institutional investor. The net proceeds from this issuance of $48.7 million were used to reduce outstanding indebtedness under our interim financing vehicles. We have the option to redeem the Series B Preferred Units after November 14, 2003 at $25.00 per Unit plus accrued and unpaid distributions. These Units are exchangeable by the holder into 8.625% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of the Trust on a one-for-one basis; however, this exchange right is generally not exercisable until after November 14, 2008. The Series B Preferred Units have no stated maturity, sinking fund or mandatory redemption.

Common Equity Repurchase Program

       We have a common equity repurchase program pursuant to which the Trust is authorized to purchase up to $200 million of its outstanding common shares or Units. We view the repurchase of common equity with consideration of other investment alternatives when capital is available to be deployed.  The Trust has repurchased shares from time to time in open market and privately negotiated transactions, depending on market prices and other conditions, using proceeds from sales of selected assets.  Whenever the Trust repurchases common shares from shareholders, we are required to redeem from the Trust an equivalent number of Units on the same terms and for the same aggregate price. After redemption, the Units redeemed by us are no longer deemed outstanding.   We have also repurchased Units for cash upon their presentation for redemption by unitholders. As of  June 30, 2003, we had redeemed 4,806 Units, including 4,506 Units redeemed by the Trust, for a total of $116.0 million, including $0.2 million in related commissions.

Shelf Registration Statement

      The Trust has an effective shelf registration statement on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission which initially provided $500 million of equity capacity. The Trust currently has $425 million of this equity capacity remaining following its May 2003 preferred equity offering.   

Portfolio and Other Financing Activity

Community Dispositions Subject to Discontinued Operations Reporting

        In February 2003, we sold an apartment community located in Dallas comprising 300 apartment homes.  The net proceeds from this sale were $18.7 million and were used to pay down outstanding borrowings under our interim financing vehicles.  The gain  from the sale of this community was $5.0 million and was recognized in the first quarter of 2003.

      During 2002, we sold two apartment communities located in Houston comprising 660 apartment homes. The net proceeds from these sales were $43.2 million and were used to pay down outstanding borrowings under our interim financing vehicles and purchase common shares and Units under our common equity repurchase program. The aggregate gain from the sale of these two communities was $9.8 million.  One of these sales occurred during the first quarter of 2002, resulting in a $2.2 million gain.  The other sale occurred during the fourth quarter of 2002.

       Historical operating results and gains are reflected as discontinued operations in our consolidated statements of operations.  See Notes 5 and 6 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further discussion.

Community and Land Dispositions Not Subject to Discontinued Operations Reporting

       During 2002, we sold a 13.3 acre parcel of land in Houston that was adjacent to an apartment community sold, an apartment community located in Houston comprising 246 apartment homes and an apartment community located in Atlanta comprising 311 apartment homes. The net proceeds from these sales were $46.8 million and were used to pay down outstanding borrowings under our interim financing vehicles and purchase common shares and Units under our common equity repurchase program. The gain from the land sale was $0.8 million and the aggregate gain from the sale of the two communities was $17.9 million.   All of these sale transactions occurred during the first quarter of 2002.  In addition, we recognized $1.3 million of deferred gain during the year ended December 31, 2002 associated with prior year sale transactions, of which $0.5 million and $1.0 million were recognized during the three months and six months, respectively, ended June 30, 2002.

     During 2002, the Gables Residential Apartment Portfolio JV (the "GRAP JV") sold two apartment communities located in South Florida comprising 610 apartment homes, an apartment community in Dallas comprising 222 apartment homes and an apartment community located in Houston comprising 382 apartment homes. Our share of the net sales proceeds after repayment of construction loan indebtedness of $46.7 million was $10.7 million, resulting in a gain of $2.6 million.  Two of these sales occurred during the first quarter of 2002, resulting in a $1.8 million gain to us.  The other two sales occurred during the third quarter of 2002.

      Historical operating results and gains are included in continuing operations in our consolidated statements of operations. See Notes 5 and 6 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further discussion.

Community Acquisitions

       On July 15, 2003, we acquired an apartment community located in Washington, D.C. comprising 211 apartment homes for approximately $53.0 million in cash.  The acquisition was financed through borrowings under our interim financing vehicles.

       On May 30, 2003, we acquired an apartment community located in Dallas comprising 334 apartment homes for approximately $33.5 million in cash.  The acquisition was financed through borrowings under our interim financing vehicles.

       On February 20, 2003, we acquired an apartment community located in Austin that is subject to a long-term ground lease and is comprised of 239 apartment homes and 7,366 square feet of retail space for approximately $30.2 million in cash.  The acquisition was financed through borrowings under our interim financing vehicles.

Other Acquisitions

       In May 2003, we acquired property management contracts for 10,684 apartment homes in 32 multifamily apartment communities from Archstone-Smith (the “Archstone Management Business”).  The management and accounting services rendered under the acquired management contracts are transitioning to us over a 3-month period.  The purchase price of approximately $6.5 million is structured to be paid in three installments based on the retention of the contracts acquired.  As of June 30, 2003, we had funded $2.2 million of the $6.5 million purchase price.

       In May 2001, we acquired a property management company based in Washington, D.C. that managed approximately 3,600 apartment homes in 24 multifamily apartment communities located in Washington, D.C. and the surrounding area (the "D.C. Management Co."). Our total investment of approximately $1.6 million was structured to be paid in three installments based on results of the acquired business operations.  As of June 30, 2003, we had funded all of the $1.6 million total investment. 

Senior Unsecured Note Issuance

       On September 27, 2002, we issued $40 million of senior unsecured notes in two series in a private placement to an institutional investor: $30 million at an interest rate of 5.86% maturing in September 2009 and $10 million at an interest rate of 6.10% maturing in September 2010. The net proceeds of $39.7 million, together with the net proceeds of $39.7 million from the concurrent issuance by the Trust of the 7.875% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, were used to retire approximately $82.5 million of senior unsecured notes at an interest rate of 8.3% that were scheduled to mature in December 2002. We did not incur any prepayment costs in connection with the early debt retirement.  Pursuant to a registration rights agreement with the purchaser of the $40 million of senior unsecured notes, we agreed to register with the Securities and Exchange Commission new notes, and to offer to exchange those new notes for the original notes.  The new notes, also to be issued in two series, will be in the same aggregate principal amount as, and will be identical in all material respects to the original 5.86% notes due 2009 and the 6.10% notes due 2010, except that the new notes will be freely tradable by a holder. We filed an exchange offer registration statement on April 15, 2003. The exchange offer, which commenced August 6, 2003, will not generate any cash proceeds for us and will expire on September 4, 2003, unless extended by us.

       On July 8, 2002, we issued $180 million of senior unsecured notes which bear interest at a rate of 5.75%, were priced to yield 5.81% and mature in July 2007. The net proceeds of $178 million were used to redeem all of the Trust’s outstanding shares of the 8.3% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares totaling $115 million on August 9, 2002 and to reduce borrowings under our interim financing vehicles.

Debt Refinancing

       In May 2002, we called $48.4 million of secured tax-exempt bond indebtedness with an interest rate of 6.375% and re-issued the bonds on an unsecured basis at a fixed interest rate of 4.75%. In connection with the early extinguishment of the debt, we incurred a prepayment penalty of $1,451 and wrote-off unamortized deferred financing costs of $236. Such charges totaling $1,687 were originally reflected as an extraordinary loss in our consolidated statements of operations in accordance with accounting rules in effect at that time.  In connection with the adoption of SFAS No. 145 (see Note 5 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements) we reclassified the charges totaling $1,687 to “unusual items” within continuing operations.  The called bonds required monthly principal amortization payments that were retained in an escrow account and were not applied to reduce the outstanding principal balance of the loan. Such principal payments held in escrow totaling $4,121 were released in May 2002. This refinancing transaction allowed us to improve our debt constant by 2.75%, unencumber six communities comprising 2,028 apartment homes and achieve a positive net present value result.

Critical Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements

       Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") and a summary of our significant accounting policies is included in Notes 4 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements included in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002. Notes 5 and 6 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements include a summary of recent accounting pronouncements and their actual or expected impact on our consolidated financial statements. Our preparation of the financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Our actual results may differ from these estimates. As an owner, operator and developer of apartment communities, our critical accounting policies relate to revenue recognition, cost capitalization and asset impairment evaluation.

Revenue Recognition

      Rental: We lease our residential properties under operating leases with terms generally equal to one year or less. Rental income is recognized when earned, which materially approximates revenue recognition on a straight-line basis.

      Property management: We provide property management services to third parties and unconsolidated joint ventures. Property management fees are recognized when earned.

      Ancillary services: We provide development and construction, corporate rental housing and brokerage services to third parties and unconsolidated joint ventures. Development and construction services are typically provided under "cost plus a fee" contracts.  Because our clients are obligated to fund the costs that are incurred on their behalf pursuant to the related contract, we net the reimbursement of these costs against the billings for such costs.  Development and construction fees are recognized when earned using the percentage of completion method. During the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, we recognized $0.4 million and $0.5 million, respectively, in development and construction fees under related contracts with gross billings of $8.1 million and $9.5 million, respectively.  During the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, we recognized $1.0 million and $1.3 million, respectively, in development and construction fees under related contracts with gross billings of $19.5 million and $22.3 million, respectively. Corporate rental housing revenues and brokerage commissions are recognized when earned.

      Gains on sales of real estate assets: Gains on sales of real estate assets are recognized pursuant to the provisions of SFAS No. 66, "Accounting for Sales of Real Estate."  The specific timing of the recognition of the sale and the related gain is measured against the various criteria in SFAS No. 66 related to the terms of the transactions and any continuing involvement associated with the assets sold.  To the extent the sales criteria are not met, we defer gain recognition until the sales criteria are met.

Cost Capitalization 

      As a vertically integrated real estate company, we have in-house investment professionals involved in the development, construction and acquisition of apartment communities. Direct internal costs associated with development and construction activities for wholly-owned assets are included in the capitalized development cost of such assets. Direct internal costs associated with development and construction activities for third parties and unconsolidated joint ventures are reflected in ancillary services expense as the related services are being rendered. As required by GAAP, we expense all internal costs associated with the acquisition of operating apartment communities to general and administrative expense in the period such costs are incurred. We maintain staffing levels sufficient to meet our existing development, construction and acquisition activities. When market conditions warrant, we adjust staffing levels in an attempt to mitigate a negative impact on our results of operations.

      Our real estate development pursuits are subject to obtaining permits and other governmental approvals, as well as our ongoing business review of the underlying real estate fundamentals and the impact on our capital structure. We do not always move forward with development of our real estate pursuits, and therefore, we evaluate the viability of real estate pursuits and the recoverability of capitalized pursuit costs regularly. Based on this periodic review, we expense any costs that are deemed unrealizable at that time to general and administrative expense.

       During the development and construction of a new apartment community, we capitalize related interest costs, as well as other carrying costs such as property taxes and insurance. We begin to expense these items as the construction of the community becomes substantially complete and the residential apartment homes become available for initial occupancy. Accordingly, we gradually reduce the amounts we capitalize as construction is being completed. During the lease-up period, as a community transitions from initial occupancy to stabilized occupancy, revenues are generally insufficient to cover interest, carrying costs and operating expenses. The size and duration of this lease-up deficit depends on how quickly construction is completed, how quickly the apartments available for occupancy are leased, and what rent levels are achieved at the community.

         Expenditures in excess of $1 for purchases of a new asset with a useful life in excess of one year and for replacements and repairs that extend the useful life of the asset are capitalized and depreciated over their useful lives. Recurring value retention capital expenditures are typically incurred every year during the life of a community and include such expenditures as carpet, flooring and appliances. Non-recurring capital expenditures are costs that are generally incurred in connection with a major project impacting an entire community, such as roof replacement, parking lot resurfacing, exterior painting and siding replacement. Value-enhancing capital expenditures are costs for which an incremental value is expected to be achieved from increasing the NOI potential for a community or recharacterizing the quality of the income stream with an anticipated reduction in potential sales cap rate for items such as replacement of wood siding with a masonry based hardi-board product, amenity upgrades and additions, installation of security gates and additions of covered parking. Recurring value retention and non-recurring and/or value-enhancing capital expenditures do not include costs incurred in connection with a major renovation of an apartment community. Repairs and maintenance, such as landscaping maintenance, interior painting and cleaning and supplies used in such activities, are expensed as incurred.

Depreciation and Asset Impairment Evaluation

        Under GAAP, real estate assets are stated at the lower of depreciated cost or fair value, if deemed impaired.  Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of 20 to 40 years for buildings and improvements and 5 years for furniture, fixtures and equipment. As required by GAAP, we periodically evaluate our real estate assets to determine if there has been any impairment in their carrying value and record impairment losses if there are indicators of impairment and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets carrying amounts. No such impairment losses have been recognized to date.

Purchase Price Allocation for Apartment Community Acquisitions

       In connection with the acquisition of an apartment community, we perform a valuation and allocation to each asset and liability acquired in such transaction, based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. The valuation of assets acquired subsequent to July 1, 2001, the effective date of SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations," includes both tangible assets and intangible assets. Tangible asset values, consisting of land, buildings and improvements, and furniture, fixtures and equipment, are reflected in real estate assets and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Intangible asset values, consisting of at-market, in-place leases and resident relationships, are reflected in other assets and amortized over the average remaining lease term of the acquired resident relationships.

Discontinued Operations

      We adopted SFAS No. 144 effective January 1, 2002 which requires, among other things, that the operating results of certain real estate assets which have been sold subsequent to January 1, 2002, or otherwise qualify as held for disposition (as defined by SFAS No. 144), be reflected as discontinued operations in our consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented. We sold three wholly-owned operating real estate assets during the first quarter of 2002, one wholly-owned operating real estate asset during the fourth quarter of 2002 and one wholly-owned operating real estate asset during the first quarter of 2003.  We retained management of two of the assets sold during the first quarter of 2002.  Due to our continuing involvement with the operations of the two assets sold that we retained management of, the operating results of these assets are included in continuing operations. The operating results for the three remaining wholly-owned assets sold during the first and fourth quarters of 2002 and the first quarter of 2003 for which we did not retain management are reflected as discontinued operations in our consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented. Interest expense has been allocated to the results of the discontinued operations in accordance with EITF No. 87-24. We had no assets that qualified as held for disposition as defined by SFAS No. 144 at June 30, 2003 or December 31, 2002.

Results of Operations

Comparison of operating results for the three months ended June 30, 2003  (the “2003 Period”) to the three months ended June 30, 2002 (the “2002 Period”)

       Our net income is generated primarily from the operation of our apartment communities and the disposition of assets that no longer meet our investment criteria.  For purposes of evaluating comparative operating performance, we categorize our operating communities based on the period each community reaches stabilized occupancy. A community is considered to have achieved stabilized occupancy on the earlier to occur of (1) attainment of 93% physical occupancy or (2) one year after completion of construction. The combined operating performance for all of our wholly-owned apartment communities that are included in continuing operations for the 2003 Period and the 2002 Period is summarized as follows:

(a)  Communities that were owned and fully stabilized throughout both the 2003 Period and the 2002 Period (“same-store”).
(b)  Communities that were in renovation or not fully operational, acquired or sold subsequent to April 1, 2002, as applicable.
(c)  Represents direct property operating and maintenance expenses as reflected in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and excludes 
      certain expenses included in the determination of net income such as property management and other indirect operating expenses, interest expense
      and depreciation and amortization expense.
(d) Calculated as total property revenues less property operating and maintenance expenses (c). See Note 8, Segment Reporting,  to the accompanying
      financial statements for further discussion of our use of NOI as the primary financial measure of performance for our apartment communities.
      In addition, NOI from this reportable segment is reconciled to the most directly comparable GAAP measure in Note 8.

        Total property revenues increased $2,912, or 5.4%, from $54,155 to $57,067 due to an increase in the number of apartment homes resulting from the development, lease-up and acquisition of additional communities, partially offset by a decrease in same-store performance as a result of national economic weakness. 

       Property operating and maintenance expenses, as reflected in the consolidated statements of operations, increased $1,194, or 6.2%, from $19,245 to $20,439 due to an increase in the number of apartment homes resulting from the development, lease-up and acquisition of additional communities, as well as same-store expenses increasing 0.6%. The same-store expense increase is due to increases in insurance costs and property taxes, partially offset by decreases in utilities and marketing costs.

       Additional information for the 62 same-store apartment communities presented in the preceding table is as follows:

      
       Property management revenues increased $94, or 5.1%, from $1,857 to $1,951 due primarily to the acquisition of the Archstone Management Business.

       Ancillary services revenues decreased $657, or 31.1%, from $2,110 to $1,453 due to a decrease in corporate rental housing revenue of $325, a decrease in third-party brokerage services revenue of $212, and a decrease in development and construction fee revenue of $120.  Such decreases are due to volume declines in services rendered.

       Interest income decreased $32, or 26.7%, from $120 to $88 due primarily to a decrease in interest rates.

       Real estate asset depreciation and amortization increased $882, or 7.4%, from $11,881 to $12,763 due primarily to the impact of the development and acquisition of additional communities and capital improvements made to existing operating communities.

       Property management expense for owned communities and third-party properties on a combined basis increased $536, or 17.2%, from $3,108 to $3,644 due to the acquisition of the Archstone Management Business, along with increased marketing and support costs and inflationary increases in expenses.  We allocate property management expenses to both owned communities and third-party properties based on the proportionate share of total apartment homes owned and units managed.

       Ancillary services expense decreased $223, or 17.0%, from $1,308 to $1,085 due primarily to a decrease in development and construction expenses of $163.  Such decrease is due to volume declines in services rendered.

       Interest expense and credit enhancement fees increased $1,381, or 13.8%, from $10,029 to $11,410.  An increase in outstanding indebtedness associated with the redemption of the Series A Preferred Shares and an increase in operating debt associated with the development and acquisition of additional communities was offset in part by a decrease in interest rates for variable-rate borrowings and a decrease in outstanding indebtedness associated with sale activities and the May 2003 issuance of the Series D Preferred Shares.  In addition, the refinancings of (1) $82.5 million of indebtedness that bore interest at a rate of 8.3% with $40 million of Series C Preferred Shares and $40 million of senior unsecured notes that bear interest at a weighted average interest rate of 5.9% and (2) $48.4 million of indebtedness that bore interest at a rate of 6.4% with $48.4 million of indebtedness that bears interest at a rate of 4.75% have served to reduce interest expense.

         Amortization of deferred financing costs increased $207, or 75.3%, from $275 to $482 due primarily to increased financing costs associated with the issuances of $180 million of senior unsecured notes in July 2002 and $40 million of senior unsecured notes in September 2002 and the modification of our $252 million unsecured revolving credit facility in February 2003.

        General and administrative expense increased $519, or 29.6%, from $1,753 to $2,272 due primarily to increases in professional fees, internal acquisition costs associated with the May and July 2003 acquisitions of two operating apartment communities,
payroll and long-term compensation costs and insurance costs.

       Corporate asset depreciation and amortization increased $54, or 12.6%, from $428 to $482 due primarily to an increase in amortization associated with the acquisition of the Archstone Management Business.   

       Unusual items of $1,687 in the 2002 Period represent the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs totaling $236 and a prepayment penalty of $1,451 associated with the early retirement of $48.4 million of secured tax-exempt bond indebtedness.  These bonds had an interest rate of 6.375% which we were able to re-issue on an unsecured basis at a rate of 4.75% resulting in a positive net present value.  See Notes 4 and 5 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

       Equity in income of  joint ventures increased $60, or 150%, from $40 to $100 due primarily to an increase in the number of apartment homes resulting from the development and lease-up of additional communities, partially offset by sales of two apartment communities by the GRAP JV in the third quarter of 2002.

     Our share of the operating results for the apartment communities owned by the unconsolidated joint ventures in which we have an interest during the 2003 Period and the 2002 Period is as follows:

		2003 Period
		Stabilized(a)		Development & Lease-up (b)		Sales (c)		Total		Total 2002 Period
Our share of joint venture results: Rental and other property revenues Property operating and maintenance expenses (exclusive of items shown separately below)      Property net operating income Interest expense and credit enhancement fees Amortization of deferred costs Other      Funds from operations Gain on sale of real estate assets Real estate asset depreciation      Equity in income of joint ventures Number of operating communities Number of apartment homes in operating communities Average percent occupied during the period		$1,012 (    423 $   589 (   182  (     13 (     10 $384 - (    280 $    104 7 2,404 91	) ) ) ) ) %	$   170 (      69 $   101 (      31  (        4 (         1 $     65 - (      69 $     (4) 2 571 51	) ) ) ) ) %	$      -          - $      - -  -         - $      - -         - $      - - - -		$  1,182            ( 492 $     690 ( 213  (   17 (   11 $    449 -     ( 349 $    100 9 2,975 83	) ) ) ) ) %	$1,162 (    532 $   630 (   222  (     16 (     10 $   382 - (   342 $     40   10 3,190 78	) ) ) ) ) %

(a) Communities that were owned and fully stabilized throughout the 2003 Period.
(b) Communities in the development and/or lease-up phase that were not fully stabilized during all or any of  the 2003 Period.
(c) Communities that were sold subsequent to April 1, 2003.

       Gain on sale of land and development rights of $462 in the 2002 Period relates to recognition of deferred gain associated with the 2001 contribution of land and development rights into the GRAP JV Two.

       Income from discontinued operations of  $467 in the 2002 Period relates to the classification of the operating results of two wholly-owned assets sold during the fourth quarter of 2002 and first quarter of 2003 as discontinued operations.  There were no community dispositions subject to discontinued operations reporting in the 2003 Period.

       Distributions to preferred unitholders decreased $770, or 21.9%, from $3,520 to $2,750 due to the $115 million redemption of the Trust’s Series A Preferred Shares in August 2002, offset in part by the $40 million issuance of the Trust’s Series C Preferred Shares in September 2002 and the $75 million issuance of the Trust’s Series D Preferred Shares in May 2003.

Comparison of operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2003  (the “2003 Period”) to the six months ended June 30, 2002 (the “2002 Period”)

       Our net income is generated primarily from the operation of our apartment communities and the disposition of assets that no longer meet our investment criteria.  For purposes of evaluating comparative operating performance, we categorize our operating communities based on the period each community reaches stabilized occupancy. A community is considered to have achieved stabilized occupancy on the earlier to occur of (1) attainment of 93% physical occupancy or (2) one year after completion of construction. The combined operating performance for all of our wholly-owned apartment communities that are included in continuing operations for the 2003 Period and the 2002 Period is summarized as follows:

(a)  Communities that were owned and fully stabilized throughout both the 2003 Period and the 2002 Period (“same-store”).
(b)  Communities that were in renovation or not fully operational, acquired or sold subsequent to January 1, 2002, as applicable.
(c)  Represents direct property operating and maintenance expenses as reflected in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and excludes 
      certain expenses included in the determination of net income such as property management and other indirect operating expenses, interest expense
      and depreciation and amortization expense.
(d) Calculated as total property revenues less property operating and maintenance expenses (c). See Note 8, Segment Reporting,  to the accompanying
     financial statements for further discussion of our use of NOI as the primary financial measure of performance for our apartment communities.
     In addition, NOI from this reportable segment is reconciled to the most directly comparable GAAP measure in Note 8.

        Total property revenues increased $4,020, or 3.7%, from $109,514 to $113,534 due to an increase in the number of apartment homes resulting from the development, lease-up and acquisition of additional communities, partially offset by the sale of two apartment communities in the first quarter of 2002 and a decrease in same-store performance as a result of national economic weakness. 

       Property operating and maintenance expenses, as reflected in the consolidated statements of operations, increased $2,333, or 6.2%, from $37,875 to $40,208 due to an increase in the number of apartment homes resulting from the development and acquisition of additional communities, as well as same-store expenses increasing 1.3%. The same-store expense increase is due to increases in insurance costs, property taxes and maintenance expenses, partially offset by a decrease in utilities and general and administrative expenses. This increase was offset in part by the sale of  two apartment communities in the first quarter of 2002.

       Additional information for the 62 same-store apartment communities presented in the preceding table is as follows:

    

       Property management revenues increased $128, or 3.5%, from $3,672 to $3,800 due primarily to the acquisition of the Archstone Management Business. 

       Ancillary services revenues decreased $1,329, or 28.5%, from $4,655 to $3,326 due to a decrease in corporate rental housing revenue of $525, a decrease in third-party brokerage services revenue of $505, and a decrease in development and construction fee revenue of $299.  Such decreases are due to volume declines in services rendered.

       Interest income decreased $20, or 11.0%, from $181 to $161 due primarily to a decrease in interest rates.

       Real estate asset depreciation and amortization increased $2,245, or 9.5%, from $23,534 to $25,779 due primarily to the impact of the development and acquisition of additional communities and capital improvements made to existing operating communities, offset in part by the impact of the sale of two apartment communities in the first quarter of 2002.

       Property management expense for owned communities and third-party properties on a combined basis increased $388, or 5.8%, from $6,742 to $7,130 due to the acquisition of the Archstone Management Business, along with increased marketing and support costs and inflationary increases in expenses.  These increases were partially offset by software licensing fees incurred in the 2002 Period, but not the 2003 Period.  We allocate property management expenses to both owned communities and third-party properties based on the proportionate share of total apartment homes owned and units managed.    

       Ancillary services expense decreased $469, or 16.9%, from $2,779 to $2,310 due primarily to a decrease in development and construction expenses of $374.  Such decrease is due to volume declines in services rendered.

       Interest expense and credit enhancement fees increased $2,741, or 13.6%, from $20,148 to $22,889. An increase in outstanding indebtedness associated with the redemption of the Series A Preferred Shares and an increase in operating debt associated with the development and acquisition of additional communities was offset in part by a decrease in interest rates for variable-rate borrowings and a decrease in outstanding indebtedness associated with sale activities and the May 2003 issuance of the Series D Preferred Shares.  In addition, the refinancings of (1) $82.5 million of indebtedness that bore interest at a rate of 8.3% with $40 million of Series C Preferred Shares and $40 million of senior unsecured notes that bear interest at a weighted average interest rate of 5.9% and  (2) $48.4 million of indebtedness that bore interest at a rate of 6.4% with $48.4 million of indebtedness that bears interest at a rate of 4.75% have served to reduce interest expense.

         Amortization of deferred financing costs increased $374, or 70.3%, from $532 to $906 due primarily to increased financing costs associated with the issuances of $180 million of senior unsecured notes in July 2002 and $40 million of senior unsecured notes in September 2002 and the modification of our $252 million unsecured revolving credit facility in February 2003.

        General and administrative expense increased $930, or 25.3%, from $3,675 to $4,605 due primarily to increases in professional fees, internal acquisition costs associated with the acquisitions of three operating apartment communities in 2003, payroll and long-term compensation costs and insurance costs.
 
       Corporate asset depreciation and amortization decreased $57, or 6.5%, from $881 to $824 due primarily to a non-recurring adjustment recorded to depreciation in the 2003 Period, partially offset by an increase in amortization associated with the acquisition of the Archstone Management Business.   

       Unusual items of $1,687 in the 2002 Period represent the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs totaling $236 and a prepayment penalty of $1,451 associated with the early retirement of $48.4 million of secured tax-exempt bond indebtedness.  These bonds had an interest rate of 6.375% which we were able to re-issue on an unsecured basis at a rate of 4.75% resulting in a positive net present value.  See Notes 4 and 5 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

       Equity in income of  joint ventures decreased $1,733, or 89.9%, from $1,928 to $195 due primarily to the 2002 sales of four apartment communities by the GRAP JV.  Two of these sales occurred during the 2002 Period, resulting in the recognition of a $1,754 gain by us during the 2002 Period.   

     Our share of the operating results for the apartment communities owned by the unconsolidated joint ventures in which we have an interest during the 2003 Period and the 2002 Period is as follows:

		2003 Period
		Stabilized(a)		Development & Lease-up (b)		Sales (c)		Total		Total 2002 Period
Our share of joint venture results: Rental and other property revenues Property operating and maintenance expenses (exclusive of items shown separately below)      Property net operating income Interest expense and credit enhancement fees Amortization of deferred costs Other      Funds from operations Gain on sale of real estate assets Real estate asset depreciation      Equity in income of joint ventures Number of operating communities Number of apartment homes in operating communities Average percent occupied during the period		$1,572     (662 $   910 (306 (  11 (  26 $  567 - (  430 $  137 6 2,084 91	) ) ) ) ) %	$  756    (297 $  459 (  115 (    22   (      5 $  317 -    (259 $    58 3 891 60	) ) ) ) ) %	$       -          - $       - - -         - $      - -         -         - - - -		$2,328      (  959 $1,369 (  421 (    33 (    31 $  884 - (  689 $  195 9 2,975 82	) ) ) ) ) %	$2,600 (  1,148 $  1,452 (     474  (       39 (       21 $     918 1,754 (     744 $ 1,928         12 3,892 79	) ) ) ) ) %

(a) Communities that were owned and fully stabilized throughout the 2003 Period.
(b) Communities in the development and/or lease-up phase that were not fully stabilized during all or any of  the 2003 Period.
(c) Communities that were sold subsequent to January 1, 2003.

        Gain on sale of previously depreciated operating real estate assets of $17,906 in the 2002 Period relates to the sale of two wholly-owned communities comprising 557 apartment homes located in Houston and Atlanta.

       Gain on sale of land and development rights of $1,801 in the 2002 Period is comprised of (1) $763 associated with the sale of 13.3 acres of land in Houston, (2) recognition of $953 in deferred gain associated with the 2001 contribution of land and development rights into the GRAP JV Two and (3) recognition of $85 of deferred gain associated with a land sale in 2000.
 
      Income from discontinued operations increased $1,816, or 56.5%, from $3,216 to $5,032 due primarily to the $5,042 gain on disposition of discontinued operations recognized in the 2003 Period, as compared to the $2,198 gain on disposition of discontinued operations recognized in the 2002 Period.  This increase was partially offset by the classification of the 2002 Period operating results of three wholly-owned assets sold during the first and fourth quarters of 2002 and first quarter of 2003 as discontinued operations.

       Distributions to preferred unitholders decreased $2,369, or 33.6%, from $7,041 to $4,672 due to the $115 million redemption of the Trust’s Series A Preferred Shares in August 2002, offset in part by the $40 million issuance of the Trust’s Series C Preferred Shares in September 2002 and the $75 million issuance of the Trust’s Series D Preferred Shares in May 2003.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

       Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations decreased from $51,241 for the six months ended June 30, 2002 to $47,341 for the six months ended June 30, 2003 due to (1) a change in other liabilities between periods of $1,188, (2) a change in other assets between periods of $874 and (3)  a decrease of $2,980 in income from continuing operations (a) before certain non-cash or non-operating items, including depreciation, amortization, equity in income of joint ventures, gain on sale of real estate assets, long-term compensation expense and unusual items and (b) after operating distributions received from joint ventures. Such decreases were offset in part by a change in restricted cash between periods of $1,142.  Net cash provided by operating activities from discontinued operations decreased from $1,727 to $39 due to the disposition of discontinued operations in 2002 and 2003.

      We had $17,236 of net cash provided by investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2002 compared to $106,521 of net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2003. During the six months ended June 30, 2003, we expended $111,991 related to acquisition, development, construction and renovation expenditures, $5,225 related to recurring value retention capital expenditures for operating apartment communities, $4,348 related to non-recurring and/or value-enhancing capital expenditures for operating apartment communities, $892 related to our investment in joint ventures and $2,802 related to other investments.  During the six months ended June 30, 2003, we received cash of $18,737 in connection with the disposition of discontinued operations. During the six months ended June 30, 2002, we expended $39,055 related to acquisition, development, construction and renovation expenditures, $6,364 related to recurring value retention capital expenditures for operating apartment communities, $4,748 related to non-recurring and/or value-enhancing capital expenditures for operating apartment communities and $766 related to our investment in joint ventures.    During the six months ended June 30, 2002, we received cash of (1) $46,803 in connection with the sale of wholly-owned real estate assets, (2) $15,273 in connection with the disposition of discontinued operations and (3) $6,093 in connection with our share of the net proceeds from the sale of joint venture real estate assets.

        We had $69,571 of net cash used in financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2002 compared to $61,805 of net cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2003. During the six months ended June 30, 2003, we received net proceeds of (1) $72,419 from the issuance by the Trust of the Series D Preferred Shares, (2) $28,152 from net borrowings and (3) $4,347 from the exercise of share options.  We expended  (1) $41,631 in common and preferred distributions, (2) $1,220 in deferred financing costs and (3) $262 of principal escrow payments deposited into escrow. During the six months ended June 30, 2002, we expended (1) $43,978 for common and preferred distributions, (2) $33,861 in net repayments of borrowings, (3) $1,451 for a prepayment penalty, (4) deferred financing costs of $992 and (5) $231 for Unit redemptions.  These payments were offset in part by proceeds from the exercise of share options of $7,302 and principal payments released from escrow, net of $3,640.

        The Trust has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code. To qualify as a REIT, the Trust must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that it currently distribute at least 90% of the REIT's ordinary taxable income to its shareholders.  It is the current intention of the Trust to adhere to these requirements and maintain its REIT status. As a REIT, the Trust generally will not be subject to federal income tax on distributed taxable income. We utilize Gables Residential Services, a taxable REIT subsidiary, to provide management and other services to third parties that we, as a REIT, may be prohibited from providing. Taxable REIT subsidiaries are subject to federal, state and local income taxes.

         As of June 30, 2003, we had total indebtedness of $986,726, cash and cash equivalents of $8,945 and principal escrow deposits reflected in restricted cash of $813.  Our indebtedness has an average of 3.44 years to maturity at June 30, 2003. 

        The aggregate maturities of our notes payable at June 30, 2003 are as follows:

          The indebtedness outstanding under each of our credit facilities totaling $98,025 at June 30, 2003 is reflected in the preceding table using the May 2005 maturity date of our $252 million credit facility. Outstanding indebtedness for each tax-exempt bond issue is reflected in the preceding table using the earlier of the related bond maturity date or the bond enhancement facility maturity date, as applicable. 
 
        Our common and preferred distributions historically have been paid from cash provided by recurring real estate activities. We anticipate that such distributions will continue to be paid from cash provided by recurring real estate activities that include both operating activities and asset disposition activities when evaluated over a twelve-month period. This twelve-month evaluation period is relevant due to the timing of the payment of expense items that are accrued monthly but are paid on a less frequent basis, such as real estate taxes and interest on our senior unsecured notes.

         We have met and expect to continue to meet our short-term liquidity requirements through net cash provided by recurring real estate activities. Our net cash from recurring real estate activities has been adequate, and we believe that it will continue to be adequate, to meet both operating requirements and payment of dividends in accordance with REIT requirements. Recurring value retention capital expenditures and non-recurring and/or value-enhancing capital expenditures, in addition to monthly principal amortization payments, are also expected to be funded from recurring real estate activities that include both operating and asset disposition activities. We anticipate that acquisition, construction, development and renovation activities as well as land purchases, will be initially funded primarily through borrowings under our credit facilities described below.     

       We expect to meet our long-term liquidity requirements, including scheduled debt maturities, repayment of short-term financing of construction, development and renovation activities and possible property acquisitions, through long-term secured and unsecured borrowings, the issuance of debt securities or equity securities, private equity investments in the form of joint ventures, or through the disposition of assets which, in our evaluation, may no longer meet our investment requirements.

      We currently have seven communities under development that are expected to comprise 2,015 apartment homes upon completion and an indirect 20% ownership interest in two development communities that are expected to comprise 373 apartment homes upon completion. The estimated costs to complete the development of these assets total $104 million at June 30, 2003, including $1 million of costs that are obligated to fund for the co-investment development communities. These costs are expected to be initially funded by $32 million in construction loan proceeds and $72 million in borrowings under our credit facilities described below.

$252 Million Credit Facility

       In February 2003, we closed a modification to our $225 million unsecured revolving credit facility provided by a syndicate of banks which, among other things, increased the committed capacity thereunder to $252 million from $225 million. We have the option to further increase the capacity under the facility to $300 million from $252 million to the extent banks, from the syndicate or otherwise, voluntarily agree to provide the additional commitment. The facility currently has a maturity date of May 2005. Borrowings under the $252 million facility currently bear interest at our option of LIBOR plus 0.95% or prime minus 0.25%. Such scheduled interest rates may be adjusted up or down based on changes in our senior unsecured credit ratings and our leverage ratios. We may also enter into competitive bid loans with participating banks for up to $126 million at rates below the scheduled rates. In addition, we pay an annual facility fee currently equal to 0.20% of the $252 million commitment. In February 2003, approximately $46 million of letters of credit enhancing approximately $45 million of tax-exempt variable rate notes payable were re-issued under this facility.  The total amounts outstanding under the facility and the resulting availability under the facility at June 30, 2003 is as follows:

$75 Million Borrowing Facility

       We have a $75 million unsecured borrowing facility with a bank that currently has a maturity date of May 2005. The interest rate and maturity date related to each advance under this facility is agreed to by both parties prior to each advance. We had $16.6 million in borrowings outstanding under this facility at June 30, 2003 at an interest rate of 1.60%.

$10 Million Credit Facility

       At June 30, 2003, we had $1.4 million in borrowings outstanding under our $10 million unsecured revolving credit facility provided by a bank. The facility currently has a maturity date of December 31, 2003 with unlimited one-year extension options. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at the same scheduled interest rates as the $252 million credit facility.

Secured Construction Loans

       We have committed fundings under four construction-related financing vehicles for two wholly-owned development communities totaling $43.0 million from a bank. At June 30, 2003, we had drawn approximately $11.1 million under these variable-rate financing vehicles and therefore have approximately $31.9 million of remaining capacity. Borrowings under these vehicles bear interest at a weighted average rate of 3.20% at June 30, 2003.

Restrictive Covenants
      
       Our secured and unsecured debt agreements generally contain representations, financial and other covenants and events of default typical for each specific type of facility or borrowing.

       The indentures under which our publicly traded and other unsecured debt securities have been issued contain the following limitations on the incurrence of indebtedness: (1) a maximum leverage ratio of 60% of total assets; (2) a minimum debt service coverage ratio of 1.50:1; (3) a maximum secured debt ratio of 40% of total assets; and (4) a minimum amount of unencumbered assets of  150% of total unsecured debt.  Our indentures also include other affirmative and restrictive covenants.

       Our ability to borrow under our unsecured credit facilities and secured construction loans is subject to our compliance with a number of financial covenants, affirmative covenants and other restrictions on an ongoing basis.  The principal financial covenants impacting our leverage are: (1) our total debt may not exceed 60% of our total assets; (2) our annualized interest coverage ratio may not be less than 2.0:1; (3) our annualized fixed charge coverage ratio may be not less than 1.75:1; (4) our total secured debt may not exceed 35% of our total assets, and the recourse portion of our secured debt may not exceed 10% of our total assets; (5) our unencumbered assets may not be less than 175% of our total unsecured debt; (6) our tangible net worth may not be less than $600 million; and (7) our floating rate debt may not exceed 30% of our total assets.   Such financing vehicles also restrict the amount of capital we can invest in specific categories of assets, such as unimproved land, properties under construction, non-multifamily properties, debt or equity securities, and unconsolidated affiliates.

        In addition, we have a covenant under our unsecured credit facilities and secured construction loans that restricts our ability to make distributions in excess of stated amounts, which in turn restricts the Trust’s ability to declare and pay dividends.  In general, during any fiscal year, we may only distribute up to 100% of our consolidated income available for distribution.  This provision contains an exception to this limitation to allow us to make any distributions necessary to (1) allow the Trust to maintain its status as a REIT or (2) distribute 100% of the Trust’s taxable income.  We do not anticipate that this provision will adversely affect our ability to make distributions sufficient for the Trust to pay dividends under its current dividend policy.

       Our credit facilities, construction loans and indentures are cross-defaulted and also contain cross default provisions with other of our material indebtedness.  We were in compliance with covenants and other restrictions included in our debt agreements as of June 30, 2003.  The indentures and the $252 million credit facility agreement containing the financial covenants discussed above, as well as the other material terms of our indebtedness, including definitions of the many terms used in and the calculations required by financial covenants, have been filed with the Commission as exhibits to our periodic or other reports.

       Our tax-exempt bonds contain customary covenants for this type of financing which require a certain percentage of the apartments in the bond-financed communities to be rented to individuals based upon income levels specified by U.S. government programs.

Inflation

       Substantially all of the leases at our apartment communities are for a term of one year or less.  In the event of significant inflation, this may enable us to realize increased rents upon renewal of existing leases or the beginning of new leases. Short-term leases generally minimize our risk from the adverse effects of inflation, although these leases generally permit residents to leave at the end of the lease term without penalty and therefore expose us to the effect of a decline in market rents. In a deflationary rent environment, as is currently being experienced in some of our markets, we are exposed to declining rents more quickly under these shorter term leases.

Certain Factors Affecting Future Operating Results

       This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. The words "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "plan," "estimate," "assume" and other similar expressions which are predictions of or indicate future events and trends and which do not relate solely to historical matters identify forward-looking statements. These statements include, among other things, statements regarding our intent, belief or expectations with respect to the following: 

• The Trust’s ability to increase shareholder value by producing consistent high quality earnings to sustain dividends and annual total returns that exceed the NAREIT Apartment Index;
• our ability to create a portfolio of high quality assets in strategically selected markets that are complementary through economic diversity and characterized by high job growth and resiliency to economic downturns;
• the ability of our portfolio to maintain high levels of occupancy and rental rates relative to overall market conditions;
• our ability to generate a return on invested capital that exceeds our long-term weighted average cost of capital while maintaining financial flexibility through a conservative, investment grade credit profile;
• our expectation that the markets we have selected for investment will continue to experience job growth that exceeds national averages, and that our EPN locations will outperform local market results;
• our ability to meet short-term liquidity requirements, including the payment of common and preferred distributions, through net cash provided by recurring real estate activities, and to meet long-term liquidity requirements through long-term secured and unsecured borrowings, the issuance of debt securities or equity securities, private equity investments in the form of joint ventures, or through the disposition of assets which, in our evaluation, may no longer meet our investment requirements; and
• estimated development and construction costs for our development and lease-up communities, and anticipated construction commencement, completion, lease-up and stabilization dates for these communities.

     You should not rely on forward-looking statements because they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which are, in some cases, beyond our control and may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from anticipated future results, or the performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to:

• national and local economic conditions generally, and the real estate market specifically, including changes in occupancy rates and market rents, a continued deceleration of economic conditions in our markets, and a failure of national and local economic conditions to rebound in a timely manner;
• changes in job growth, household formation and population growth in our markets;
• excess supply of and insufficient demand for apartment communities in our markets;
• competition, which could limit our ability to secure attractive investment opportunities, lease apartment homes or increase or maintain rents;
• our failure to sell apartment communities in a timely manner or on favorable terms;
• uncertainties associated with our development and construction activities, including the failure to obtain zoning and other approvals, actual development and construction costs exceeding our budgeted estimates and construction material defects;
• construction and lease-up may not be completed on schedule, resulting in increased debt service expense and construction costs and reduced rental revenues;
• new debt or equity financing may not be available or may not be available on favorable terms, and existing indebtedness may mature in an unfavorable credit environment, preventing such indebtedness from being refinanced or, if financed, causing such refinancing to occur on terms that are not as favorable as the terms of existing indebtedness;
• changes in interest rates;
• cash flow from recurring real estate activities may be insufficient to meet our short-term liquidity requirements, including the payment of common and preferred distributions;
• legislative, regulatory and accounting changes, including changes to laws governing the taxation of REITs or changes in GAAP; and 
• potential liability for uninsured losses and environmental contamination.

       While forward-looking statements reflect our good faith beliefs, they are not guarantees of future performance. We disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Development and Lease-up Communities at June 30, 2003:

					Percent at June 30, 2003			Actual or Estimated Quarter of
Market	Community	No. of Apt. Homes	Total Budgeted Cost	Cost to Complete	Complete	Leased	Occupied	Constr- uction Start	Initial Occu- pancy.	Constr- uction End	Stab- ilized Occupancy
			(millions)	(millions)							(a)
Wholly-Owned Development/Lease-up Communities:
Atlanta, GA	Gables Rock Springs II (b)	233	$25	$ 10	66%	21%	10%	2 Q 2002	2 Q 2003	2 Q 2004	4 Q 2004
Austin, TX	Gables Grandview	458	56	31	29%	--	--	1 Q 2003	1 Q 2004	4 Q 2004	2 Q 2005
Dallas, TX	Gables Ellis Street	245	45	1	99%	78%	70%	3 Q 2001	3 Q 2002	3 Q 2003	4 Q 2003
Dallas, TX	Gables State Thomas Ravello	290	48	1	99%	63%	48%	4 Q 2001	1 Q 2003	3 Q 2003	2 Q 2004
Houston, TX	Gables Augusta	312	33	22	16%	--	--	1 Q 2003	1 Q 2004	4 Q 2004	2 Q 2005
South FL	Gables Floresta	311	39	25	19%	--	--	1 Q 2003	1 Q 2004	4 Q 2004	2 Q 2005
Tampa, FL	Gables Beach Park	166	22	13	24%	--	--	1 Q 2003	4 Q 2003	2 Q 2004	3 Q 2004
	Wholly-Owned Totals	2,015	$268	$103
Co-Investment Development/Lease-up Communities (c):
Tampa, FL	Gables West Park Village II	297	$ 27	$ 4	93%	31%	25%	2 Q 2002	1 Q 2003	4 Q 2003	3 Q 2004
Tampa, FL	Gables West Park Village III	76	10	8	--	--	--	3 Q 2003	2 Q 2004	4 Q 2004	1 Q 2005
	Co-Investment Totals	373	$37	$ 12	(d)

(a)  Stabilized occupancy is defined as the earlier to occur of (i) 93% occupancy or (ii) one year after completion of construction.
(b)  This community represents the reconstruction of 100 apartment homes previously owned and operated by us into 233 apartment homes.
(c)  These communities are owned by the GRAP JV Two, in which we hold an indirect 20% interest. 
(d)  Construction loan proceeds are expected to fund $6 million of these costs to complete at June 30, 2003. The remaining costs will be funded by 
       capital contributions to the venture from our venture partner and us in a funding ratio of 80% and 20%, respectively.

The projections and estimates contained in the table above are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties and actual results may differ materially from those projected and estimated in such statements. Risks associated with our development, construction and lease-up activities, which could impact the forward-looking statements made, include: development opportunities may be abandoned; construction costs of a community may exceed original estimates, possibly making the community uneconomical; and construction and lease-up may not be completed on schedule, resulting in increased debt service and construction costs.

Stabilized Communities at June 30, 2003

		No. of  Apt.	June 30, 2003			June 30, 2003       Market Rent Per
Community		Homes	Occupancy			Home		Square Foot
Atlanta, GA Briarcliff Gables Buckhead Gables Gables Cityscape Gables Metropolitan I (JV)  Gables Metropolitan II (JV) Gables Mill Gables Montclair Gables Northcliff Gables Paces Gables Rock Springs I Gables Vinings Gables Walk Gables Wood Arbor  Gables Wood Crossing Gables Wood Glen  Gables Wood Knoll Lakes at Indian Creek Roswell Gables I  Roswell Gables II Spalding Gables  Wildwood Gables Totals/Averages Houston,  TX Gables Austin Colony Gables Bradford Place  Gables Bradford Pointe  Gables Cityscape  Gables Citywalk/   Waterford Sq.  Gables Edgewater Gables Lions Head  Gables Metropolitan Uptown Gables Meyer Park I Gables Meyer Park II Gables of First Colony Gables Piney Point Gables Pin Oak Green Gables Pin Oak Park Gables Rivercrest I  Gables Rivercrest II Gables Windmill Landing Gables White Oak (JV)   Totals/Averages	104 162 182 435 274 438 183 82 80 188 315 310 140 268 380 312 603 384 284 252 546 5,922 237 372 360 252 317 292 277 318 345 296 324 246 581 474 140 140 259     186 5,416			92% 90% 93% 95% 93% 95% 91% 94% 96% 95% 95% 94% 93% 96% 92% 94% 91% 92% 92% 97%     96%   94% 95% 90% 88% 89% 91% 93% 91% 95% 97% 92% 94% 90% 93% 93% 89% 89% 93%        93%  92%	(a) (a)	$1,016 742 877 1,217 1,270 775 1,493 1,098 1,946 1,037 914 945 593 680 610 620 613 852 852 828       839 $   875 $ 987 751 671 944 947 840 803 1,048 908 1,049 1,036 854 1,000 1,013 799 785 731    967 $ 908	$0.82 0.98 1.07 1.09 1.14 0.84 0.97 0.70 1.18 0.93 0.86 0.80 0.65 0.71 0.61 0.62 0.67 0.78 0.72 0.84    0.74 $0.82 $1.01 0.87 0.87 1.11 1.17 0.95 0.95 1.15 1.05 1.05 1.04 0.92 0.98 0.99 0.95 0.93 0.84   1.11 $1.00

 

Stabilized Communities at June 30, 2003 (continued)

	No. of  Apt.	June 30, 2003		June 30, 2003    Market Rent Per
Community	Homes	Occupancy		Home		Square Foot
South FL Cotton Bay Gables Boca Place Gables Boynton Beach I Gables Boynton Beach II Gables Kings Colony Gables Mizner on the Green Gables Palma Vista Gables San Michele I Gables San Michele II  Gables San Remo Gables Town Colony Gables Town Place  Gables Wellington Hampton Lakes  Hampton Place Mahogany Bay  Vinings at Hampton Village   Totals/ Averages Austin, TX Gables at the Terrace Gables Barton Creek Gables Bluffstone Gables Central Park Gables Great Hills Gables Park Mesa Gables Town Lake Gables West Avenue    Totals/Averages Dallas, TX Gables at Pearl Street Gables CityPlace  Gables Knoxbridge Gables Mirabella Gables Spring Park Gables State Thomas Townhomes Gables Turtle Creek Gables Valley Ranch Totals/Averages Memphis, TN Arbors of Harbortown (JV) Gables Cordova  Gables Stonebridge (JV) Totals/Averages Orlando, FL Gables Celebration Gables Chatham Square Gables North Village The Commons at Little Lake Bryan Total/Averages	444 180 252 296 480 246 189 249 343 180 172 312 222 300 368 328        168 4,729 308 160 256 273 276 148 256    239 1,916 108 232 334 126 188 177 150    319 1,634 345 464    500 1,309 231 448 315    280 1,274	95% 87% 93% 95% 99% 93% 93% 88% 90% 94% 87% 96% 94% 96% 98% 95%    96%   94% 89% 93% 93% 73% 92% 93%    90%   86%   88% 93% 94% 95% 89% 90% 93% 99%     96%    94% 93% 89%   91%  91% 90% 100% 91%    100%    96%	(a)	$758  1,069 940 951 901 1,454 1,588 1,476 1,457 1,292 989 854 1,028 831 781 803     862 $1,025 $1,002 1,312 949 1,369 779 1,116 1,296   1,371 $1,135 $1,252 1,357 1,071 1,134 951 1,760 1,166      875 $1,160 $892 701    704 $753 $1,070 --- 1,108      --- $1,092	(b) (b)	$0.77 1.09 0.78 0.79 0.99 1.15 1.10 1.06 1.05 0.95 1.15 1.02 0.89 0.79 0.82 0.80   0.71 $0.93 $1.06 1.13 0.96 1.45 0.94 1.02 1.39   1.60 $1.19 $1.15 1.29 1.26 1.24 0.90 1.18 1.16    0.86 $1.12 $0.90 0.75   0.80 $0.81 $0.92 --- 0.83      --- $0.87	(b) (b)

Stabilized Communities at June 30, 2003 (continued)

	No. of  Apt.	June 30, 2003		June 30, 2003       Market Rent Per
Community	Homes	Occupancy		Home	Square Foot
Nashville, TN Brentwood Gables (JV) Gables Hendersonville (JV) Gables Hickory Hollow I Gables Hickory Hollow II Totals/Averages   Tampa, FL Gables West Park Village I (JV) Totals/Averages Washington D.C. Gables Dupont Circle Totals/Averages	254 364 276    272 1,166 320 320    82    82	94% 89% 91%      90%  91%   89% 89%     91%    91%		$938 688 650    653 $725 $1,128 $1,128 $ 2,665 $2,665		$0.83 0.73 0.73   0.68 $0.74 $0.90 $0.90 $2.74 $2.74
Grand Totals/Averages	23,768	93%		$956		$0.94

(a) (b)

This community is  under renovation or not fully operational as of June 30, 2003;  therefore, occupancy is based on apartment homes available for lease. This community is leased to a single user group pursuant to a triple net master lease.  Accordingly, scheduled rent data is not reflected as it is not comparable to the rest of our portfolio.

 

Portfolio Indebtedness Summary at June 30, 2003
Type of Indebtedness	Balance	Interest Rate (a)	Total    Rate (b)	Years to  Maturity
Fixed Rate: Unsecured fixed-rate notes Secured fixed-rate notes Unsecured tax-exempt fixed-rate loans Secured tax-exempt fixed-rate loans
	$ 500,991 136,738 48,365     20,550	6.59% 7.72% 4.75%    5.89%	6.59% 7.72% 4.75%   6.68%	3.43 4.81 1.00   11.54
Total fixed-rate indebtedness	$ 706,644	6.66%	6.68%	3.77
Variable Rate: Secured tax-exempt variable-rate loans Unsecured variable-rate credit facilities  (c) Secured variable-rate construction loans     Total variable-rate indebtedness	$ 170,955 98,025     11,102 $ 280,082	1.01% 1.62% 3.20%  1.31%	2.00% 1.62% 3.20% 1.91%	3.09 1.87 2.25 2.63
Total portfolio debt (d), (e)	$986,726	5.14%	5.33%	3.44

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(a) Interest Rate represents the weighted average interest rate incurred on our indebtedness, exclusive of deferred financing cost amortization
     and credit enhancement fees, as applicable.
(b) Total Rate represents the Interest Rate (a) plus credit enhancement fees, as applicable.
(c)  Our credit facilities bear interest at various spreads over LIBOR.  For purposes of the years to maturity disclosure, all such indebtedness is
      presented using the May 2005 maturity date of our $252,000 unsecured credit facility. 
(d) Interest associated with construction activities is capitalized as a cost of development and does not impact current earnings. The qualifying
     construction expenditures at June 30, 2003 for purposes of interest capitalization were $124,444.
(e) Excludes (i) $16,350 of tax-exempt bonds related to a joint venture in which we own a 25% interest, (ii) $85,830 million of indebtedness
     related to joint ventures in which we own a 20% interest, and (iii) $51,893 of  conventional indebtedness related to a joint venture in which
     we own an 8.26% interest.

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCUSSION - Funds From Operations

        Funds from operations (“FFO”) is used by industry analysts and investors as a supplemental operating performance measure of an equity real estate investment trust (“REIT”).  We calculate FFO in accordance with the definition that was adopted by the Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”).  FFO, as defined by NAREIT, represents net income (loss) determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), excluding extraordinary items as defined under GAAP and gains or losses from sales of previously depreciated operating real estate assets, plus certain non-cash items, such as real estate asset depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.

          Historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time.  Since real estate values instead have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors and analysts have considered presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves.  Thus, NAREIT created FFO as a supplemental measure of REIT operating performance that excludes historical cost depreciation, among other items, from GAAP net income.  The use of FFO, combined with the required primary GAAP presentations, has improved the understanding of operating results of REITs among the investing public and made comparisons of REIT operating results more meaningful.  We generally consider FFO to be a useful measure for reviewing our comparative operating and financial performance (although FFO should be reviewed in conjunction with net income which remains the primary measure of performance) because by excluding gains or losses related to sales of previously depreciated operating real estate assets and excluding real estate asset depreciation and amortization, FFO can help one compare the operating performance of a company’s real estate between periods or as compared to different companies.

       In May 2002, we expensed  $1,687 of early debt extinguishment costs.  Under accounting rules in effect at that time, these costs were classified as an extraordinary item and, as such, did not reduce FFO.  In April 2002, SFAS No. 145 was issued.  We adopted this standard on its January 1, 2003 effective date and, pursuant to the new rules, reclassified the $1,687 of early debt extinguishment costs from extraordinary items to unusual items.  In the computation of FFO pursuant to the NAREIT definition outlined above, net income is adjusted for extraordinary items but is not adjusted for unusual items.  As such, previously reported FFO for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 has been reduced by $1,687.  The adoption of this standard had no impact on previously reported net income.

       FFO presented herein is not necessarily comparable to the FFO of other REITs due to the fact that not all REITs use the NAREIT definition.  However, our FFO is comparable to the FFO of REITs that use the NAREIT definition.  FFO should not be considered an  alternative to net income as an indicator of our operating performance.  Additionally, FFO does not represent cash flows from operating, investing or financing activities as defined by GAAP.  Refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources” for a discussion of our cash needs and cash flows.  A reconciliation of FFO from net income available to common unitholders (the most directly comparable GAAP measure to FFO) is as follows: