SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10 - Q
(X) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002
( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number: 000-22683
GABLES REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)
DELAWARE |
|
58-2077966 |
|
6551 Park of Commerce Blvd., Suite 100
Boca Raton, Florida 33487
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(561) 997-9700
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past (90) days.
(1) |
(X) YES |
( ) NO |
(2) |
(X) YES |
( ) NO |
GABLES REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
FORM 10 - Q INDEX
Part I |
Financial Information |
Page |
Item 1: |
Unaudited Financial Statements |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001 | 3 | |
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 | 4 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 | 5 |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | 6 |
Item 2: |
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 14 |
Item 3: |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 34 |
Item 4: | Controls and Procedures | 35 |
|
||
Part II |
||
Item 1: |
Legal Proceedings |
36 |
Item 2: | Changes in Securities | 36 |
Item 3: | Defaults Upon Senior Securities | 36 |
Item 4: | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | 36 |
Item 5: | Other Information | 36 |
Item 6: | Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K | 36 |
|
38 |
PART I. - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
GABLES REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP |
||||||
September
30, 2002 |
December 31, 2001 |
|||||
ASSETS: |
$ $ |
|
|
$ $ |
|
|
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL: |
$ $ |
|
$ $ |
|
||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated balance sheets. |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited and Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
Unless the context otherwise requires, all references
to "we," "our" or "us" in this report refer
collectively to Gables Realty Limited Partnership and its subsidiaries.
1.
ORGANIZATION AND FORMATION
Gables Realty Limited Partnership
(the "Operating Partnership") is the entity through which Gables
Residential Trust (the "Trust"), a real estate investment trust (a
"REIT"), conducts substantially all of its business and owns,
either directly or indirectly through subsidiaries, substantially all of its
assets. The Trust was formed in 1993 under Maryland law to continue and
expand the operations of its privately owned predecessor organization. The
Trust completed its initial public offering on January 26, 1994.
We are a fully integrated real estate
company engaged in the multifamily apartment community management,
development, construction, acquisition and disposition businesses. We also
provide related brokerage and corporate rental housing services.
Substantially all of our third-party management businesses are conducted
through a wholly-owned subsidiary, Gables Residential Services.
As of September 30, 2002, the
Trust was an 80.6% economic owner of our common equity. The Trust controls
us through Gables GP, Inc. ("Gables GP"), a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Trust and our sole general partner. This structure is
commonly referred to as an umbrella partnership REIT or "UPREIT."
The board of directors of Gables GP, the members of which are the same as
the members of the Trust's board of trustees, manages our affairs by
directing the affairs of Gables GP. The Trust's limited partnership and
indirect general partnership interests in us entitle it to share in our cash
distributions, and in our profits and losses in proportion to its ownership
interest therein and entitles the Trust to vote on all matters requiring a
vote of the limited partners. Generally, our other limited partners are
persons who contributed their direct or indirect interests in certain real
estate assets to us primarily in connection with the IPO and the 1998
acquisition of the real estate assets and operations of Trammell Crow
Residential South Florida ("South Florida"). We are obligated to
redeem each common unit of limited partnership interest ("Unit")
held by a person other than the Trust at the request of the holder for an
amount equal to the fair market value of a share of the Trust's common
shares at the time of such redemption, provided that we, at our option, may
elect to acquire each Unit presented for redemption for one common share or
cash. Such limited partners' redemption rights are reflected in
"limited partners' capital interest" in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets at the cash redemption amount at the balance
sheet date. The Trust's percentage ownership interest in us will increase
with each redemption. In addition, whenever the Trust issues common shares
or preferred shares, it is obligated to contribute any net proceeds to us
and we are obligated to issue an equivalent number of common or preferred
Units, as applicable, to the Trust.
Distributions to holders of Units are
made to enable distributions to be made to the Trust's shareholders under
its dividend policy. The Trust must currently distribute 90% of its ordinary
taxable income to its shareholders. We make distributions to the Trust to
enable it to satisfy this requirement.
As of September 30, 2002, we managed a total of 159 multifamily apartment communities comprising 45,047 apartment homes for assets owned by us and our third-party clients. At September 30, 2002, we owned 73 stabilized multifamily apartment communities comprising 20,325 apartment homes, an indirect 25% interest in one stabilized apartment community comprising 345 apartment homes, an indirect 20% interest in two stabilized apartment communities comprising 621 apartment homes, and an indirect 8.3% interest in three stabilized apartment communities comprising 1,118 apartment homes. We also owned nine multifamily apartment communities under development or in lease-up at September 30, 2002 that are expected to comprise 2,142 apartment homes upon completion and an indirect 20% interest in three apartment communities under development or in lease-up at September 30, 2002 that are expected to comprise 891 apartment homes upon completion. In addition, as of September 30, 2002, we owned parcels of land on which we intend to develop three apartment communities that we currently expect will comprise an estimated 1,217 apartment homes. We also have rights to acquire additional parcels of land on which we believe we could develop communities. Any future development is subject to our obtaining permits and other governmental approvals, as well as our ongoing business review, and may not be undertaken or completed.
2. COMMON AND PREFERRED EQUITY ACTIVITY
Secondary Common Share Offerings
Since the IPO, the Trust has issued a total of 14,831 common shares in eight offerings, generating $347,771 in net proceeds which were generally used (1) to reduce outstanding indebtedness under interim financing vehicles utilized to fund development and acquisition activities and (2) for general working capital purposes, including funding of future development and acquisition activities.
Preferred Share Issuances and Redemptions
On July 24, 1997, the Trust issued 4,600 shares of 8.30% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares (liquidation preference $25.00 per share). The net proceeds from this offering of $111.0 million were used to reduce outstanding indebtedness under interim financing
vehicles. On August 9, 2002, the Trust redeemed the Series A Preferred Shares at $25.00
per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends.
On June 18, 1998, the Trust issued 180 shares of 5.0% Series Z Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares (liquidation preference $25.00 per share) in connection with the acquisition of a parcel of land for future development. The Series Z Preferred Shares, which are subject to mandatory redemption on June 18, 2018, may be
redeemed at our option at any time for $25.00 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends. The Series Z Preferred Shares are not subject to any sinking fund or convertible into any other
securities of the Trust.
On September 27, 2002, the Trust issued 1,600 shares of 7.875% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares
(liquidation preference $25.00 per share) in a private placement. The net proceeds from this
issuance of $39.8 million, together with the net proceeds from the concurrent issuance of
$40 million of senior unsecured notes (Note 4), were used to retire $82.5
million of senior unsecured notes at an interest rate of
8.3% that were scheduled to mature in December 2002. The Series C
Preferred Shares may be redeemed at $25.00 per share plus accrued and unpaid
dividends on or after September 30, 2006. The Series C Preferred Shares are not subject to
any sinking fund or convertible into any other securities of the Trust.
Issuances of Common Operating Partnership Units
Since the IPO, we have issued a total of 4,421 Units in connection with the South Florida acquisition, the acquisition of other operating apartment
communities and the acquisition of a parcel of land for future development.
Issuance of Preferred Operating Partnership Units
On November 12, 1998, we issued 2,000 of
our 8.625% Series B Preferred Units to an institutional investor. The net proceeds from this issuance of $48.7 million were used to reduce outstanding indebtedness under interim financing
vehicles. We have the option to redeem the Series B Preferred Units after November 14, 2003. These Units are exchangeable by the holder into 8.625% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of
the Trust on a one-for-one basis; however, this exchange right is generally not exercisable until after November 14, 2008. The Series B Preferred Units have no stated
maturity, sinking fund or mandatory redemption.
Common Equity Repurchase Program
We have a common equity repurchase program pursuant to which
the Trust is authorized to purchase up to $150 million of its outstanding common shares or Units.
The Trust has repurchased shares from time to time in open market and privately negotiated transactions, depending on market prices and other conditions, using proceeds from sales of selected assets.
Whenever the Trust repurchases common shares from shareholders, we are required
to redeem from the Trust an equivalent number of Units on the same terms and for
the same aggregate price. After redemption, the Units redeemed by us are
no longer deemed outstanding. Units have also been repurchased for cash upon their presentation for redemption by unitholders. As of
September 30, 2002, we had redeemed 4,476 Units, including 4,181 Units redeemed by the
Trust, for a total of $107,814, including related commissions of $167.
Shelf Registration Statement
We have an effective shelf registration statement on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission
that currently provides $500 million of equity capacity. The debt
portion of this shelf
registration statement has been fully utilized after our February 2001 and July
2002 senior unsecured note offerings.
3. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the consolidated accounts of
the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries, including Gables Residential
Services. We consolidate the financial statements of all entities in which we have a controlling financial interest, as that term is defined under generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), through either majority voting interest or contractual agreements.
Our investments in non-majority owned and/or non-controlled joint ventures are
accounted for using the equity method. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited and Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
The accompanying interim unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP for interim financial information and in conjunction with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In our opinion, all adjustments (consisting only of normally recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation for these interim periods have been included. The results of operations for the interim
period ended September 30, 2002 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements included in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2001.
Certain amounts in the 2001
financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2002
presentation.
4. PORTFOLIO AND OTHER FINANCING ACTIVITY
Community Dispositions Subject to Discontinued Operations Reporting
In January 2002, we sold an
operating apartment community in Houston comprising 256 apartment homes. The
net proceeds from this sale were $15.3 million and were used to paydown
outstanding borrowings under our credit facilities. The gain from the
sale of this community was $2.2 million.
In March 2002, the Gables Residential
Apartment Portfolio JV (the "GRAP JV") sold an operating apartment
community located in Houston comprising 382 apartment homes for $31.0
million. Our share of the net sales proceeds after repayment of
construction loan indebtedness of $14.0 million was $3.1 million, resulting
in a gain of $0.7 million.
Historical operating results and gains are reflected in discontinued
operations. See Notes 5 and 6 for further discussion.
Community and Land Dispositions Not Subject to Discontinued Operations
Reporting
In January 2002, we sold (i) a 13.3
acre parcel of land in Houston that was adjacent to the 256 apartment home
community sold and (ii) an operating apartment community in Houston
comprising 246 apartment homes. In March 2002, we sold an operating
apartment community in Atlanta comprising 311 apartment homes. The net
proceeds from these sales were $46.8 million and were used to paydown
outstanding borrowings under our credit facilities. The gain from the
land sale was $0.8 million and the aggregate gain from the sale of the two
communities was $17.9 million.
In March 2002, the GRAP JV sold an
operating apartment community located in South Florida comprising 320
apartment homes for $27.7 million. Our share of the net sales proceeds
after repayment of construction loan indebtedness of $11.4 million was $3.0
million, resulting in a gain of $1.0 million.
The GRAP JV sold an
operating apartment community located in Dallas comprising 222
apartment homes in July 2002 and an operating
apartment community in South Florida comprising 290 apartment homes in
September 2002.
The aggregate sales price for these two communities was $45.4 million.
Our share of the net sales proceeds after repayment of construction loan
indebtedness of $21.2 million was $4.6 million, resulting in a gain of $0.9
million.
During 2001, we contributed our interest in certain land and development rights
to the Gables Residential Apartment Portfolio JV Two (the "GRAP JV
Two") in return for (1) cash of $18.5 million and (2) capital account
credit of $4.6 million. The $2.8 million of gain we have recorded associated with this contribution
was recognized when earned using
the percentage of completion method since we serve as the developer and general
contractor for the joint venture. As of September 30, 2002, we had recognized
$2.8 million of this gain. We recognized $0.3 million and $0.4 million of this gain
during the three months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively, and
$1.2 million and $1.2 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2002
and 2001,
respectively.
In addition,
during the three months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, we recognized $0.0 million
and $0.1 million, respectively, of deferred gain associated with a parcel of land we sold in 2000. During the
nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, we recognized $0.1 million and
$0.6 million, respectively, of deferred gain associated with this land sale.
During 2001, we sold an apartment community located in Atlanta comprising
386 apartment homes, an apartment community located in Houston comprising 776
apartment homes, an apartment community located in Dallas comprising 536
apartment homes and a 2.5 acre parcel of land adjacent to one of our development
communities located in Atlanta. The net proceeds from these sales totaled
$93.6 million, $9 million of which was deposited into an escrow account and used
to fund acquisition activities. The balance of the net proceeds was used
to repay a $16 million note assumed in connection with our September 2001
acquisition of the Gables State Thomas Ravello community and to paydown
outstanding borrowings under interim financing vehicles. The gain from the land
sale was $0.9 million and the aggregate gain from the sale of the previously
depreciated operating real estate assets was $34.1 million, all of which was recognized
in 2001.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited and Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
Historical operating results and gains are reflected in
continuing operations. See Notes 5 and 6 for further discussion.
Community Acquisitions
On September 28, 2001, we acquired the 80% membership interest of our
venture partner in the GRAP JV in the Gables State Thomas Ravello apartment
community located in Dallas comprising 290 apartment homes. In consideration for such community, we paid $12 million in cash and assumed a $16
million secured variable-rate note. This consideration was based on a
valuation of the asset of $31 million and is net of our $3 million share of the
venture distribution. We recorded a $5 million charge to unusual items in
the third quarter of 2001 associated with the write-off of building components that
are being replaced in connection with a remediation program to
address water infiltration issues plaguing the asset.
On August 28, 2001, we acquired an apartment community located in
Washington, D.C. comprising 82 apartment homes for approximately $25 million.
On August 1, 2001, we acquired the 75% interest of our venture partner in
the Gables Metropolitan Uptown apartment community located in Houston comprising
318 apartment homes. The asset was valued at approximately $27 million.
On March 30, 2001, we acquired the 80% membership interests of our venture
partner in the GRAP JV in the Gables Palma Vista and Gables San Michelle II
apartment communities located in South Florida comprising 532 apartment homes
for $66 million. This cash consideration was based on a valuation of the assets
of $75 million and is net of our $9 million share of the venture distribution.
Other Acquisition
In May 2001, we acquired a property management company based in
Washington,
D.C. that managed approximately 3,600 units in 24 multifamily apartment
communities located in Washington, D.C. and the surrounding area at the time of
the acquisition (the "D.C.
Management Co."). The total investment is approximately $1.6 million
and is structured to be paid in three installments based on results of the
acquired business operations.
Senior Unsecured Note Issuance
On February 22, 2001, we issued $150 million of senior unsecured notes which
bear interest at an annual rate of 7.25%, were priced to yield 7.29% and mature in February 2006.
The net proceeds of $148.5 million were used to reduce borrowings under our
unsecured credit facilities and repay our $40 million term loan, which had a
November 2001 maturity date.
On July 8, 2002, we issued $180 million
of senior unsecured notes which bear interest at an annual rate of 5.75%,
were priced to yield 5.81% and mature in July 2007.
The net proceeds of
$178 million were used to redeem all outstanding shares of the 8.3% Series A
Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares totaling $115 million on August 9, 2002 and to reduce borrowings under our
unsecured credit facilities.
On September 27, 2002, we issued $40 million of senior unsecured
notes in two tranches in a private placement: $30 million at an annual rate of 5.86% maturing in
September 2009, and $10 million at an annual rate of 6.10% maturing in September
2010. The net proceeds of $39.8 million, together with the net proceeds
from the concurrent issuance of Series C Preferred Shares (Note 2), were used to retire
$82.5 million of senior unsecured notes at an interest rate of 8.3% that were
scheduled to mature in December 2002. We did not incur any prepayment
costs in connection with the early debt retirement.
Debt Refinancing
In May 2002, we called $48.4 million of
secured tax-exempt bond indebtedness with an interest rate of 6.375% and
re-issued the bonds on an unsecured basis at a rate of 4.75%. In
connection with the early extinguishment of debt, we incurred a prepayment
penalty of $1,451 and wrote-off unamortized deferred financing costs totaling
$236. Such charges totaling $1,687 are reflected as an extraordinary loss
in the statements of operations. The previous bonds required monthly principal amortization
payments that were retained in an escrow account and were not applied to reduce
the outstanding principal balance of the loan. Such principal payments
held in escrow totaling $4,121 were released in May 2002. This refinancing
transaction allowed us to improve our debt constant by 2.75%, unencumber six
communities comprising 2,028 apartment homes and achieve a positive net present
value result.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited and Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
5. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June 1998, SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities," was issued, establishing accounting
and reporting standards requiring that every derivative instrument, including
certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, be recorded in the
balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value. SFAS
No. 133 requires that changes in the derivative's fair value be recognized
currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. Special
accounting for qualifying hedges allows a derivative's gains and losses to
offset related results on the hedged item in the statements of operations, and
requires that a company must formally document, designate, and assess the
effectiveness of transactions that receive hedge accounting. SFAS No. 133,
as amended by SFAS No. 137, was effective for us beginning January 1,
2001. The impact of SFAS No. 133 on our financial statements will depend on the
extent, type and effectiveness of our hedging activities. SFAS No. 133
could increase volatility in net income and other comprehensive income. We had
no derivative instruments in place from January 1, 2001 to September 30, 2002.
In June 2001, SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations," (effective
for us July 1, 2001) and SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets," (effective for us January 1, 2002) were issued. SFAS No. 141
prohibits pooling-of-interests accounting for acquisitions. SFAS No. 142
specifies that goodwill and some intangible assets will no longer be amortized
but instead will be subject to periodic impairment testing. We have
not accounted for any of our business combinations since our IPO using the
pooling method of accounting and did not have goodwill or other intangible assets
at December 31, 2001 or September 30, 2002. As a result, the adoption of SFAS No. 141 and SFAS No. 142 did not have a significant impact on our financial statements.
In August 2001, SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations," (effective for us January 1, 2003) was issued.
SFAS No. 143 requires that entities recognize the fair value of a liability for
an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred if a
reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. We believe that the
adoption of SFAS No. 143 will not have a significant impact on our financial
statements.
In August 2001, SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets," (effective for us January 1, 2002) was issued.
SFAS No. 144 addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment of
long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of. The
statement supersedes SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of," and among
other factors, establishes criteria beyond that previously specified in SFAS No.
121 to determine when a long-lived asset is to be considered as held for sale.
The implementation of SFAS No. 144 requires that the gains and losses from the
disposition of certain real estate assets and the related historical operating
results be included in discontinued
operations in the statements of operations for all periods presented. In
the normal course of business, we recycle invested capital by disposing of
existing assets and redeploying the proceeds in order to enhance total
returns to shareholders. Although net income is not affected, we
expect to reclassify results previously included in continuing operations to
discontinued operations for any qualifying dispositions in accordance with
SFAS No. 144. We believe that the impairment
provisions of SFAS No. 144 are similar to SFAS No. 121 and that the adoption
thereof will not have a significant impact on our financial statements.
In April 2002, SFAS No. 145, "Rescission of SFAS
Nos. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of SFAS No. 13, and Technical
Corrections," was issued. SFAS No. 145 (effective for us January
1, 2003), among other things, eliminates therequirement that all gains and losses from the extinguishment of debt be aggregated and, if
material, classified as an extraordinary item. However, a gain or loss
arising from such an event or transaction would continue to be classified as
an extraordinary item if the event or transaction is both unusual in nature
and infrequent in occurrence per the criteria in APB No. 30, "Reporting
the Results of Operations - Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment
of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events
and Transactions." As part of the transition guidance, although net income would not be
affected, gains and
losses from debt extinguishment in prior periods that do not meet the
criteria in APB No. 30 must be reclassified to continuing operations for all
periods presented.
In June 2002, SFAS No. 146,
"Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities," was
issued. SFAS No. 146 requires recording costs associated with exit or
disposal activities at their fair values when a liability has been
incurred. Under previous guidance, certain exit costs were accrued upon
management's commitment to an exit plan, which is generally before an actual
liability has been incurred. Adoption of SFAS No. 146 is to be applied
prospectively to exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31,
2002. We believe that the adoption of SFAS No. 146 will not have a
significant impact on our financial statements.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited and Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
6.
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
We adopted SFAS No. 144 effective
January 1, 2002 which requires, among other things, that the operating results
of certain real estate assets which have been sold subsequent to January 1, 2002,
or otherwise qualify as held for disposition (as defined by SFAS No. 144), be included in
discontinued operations in the statements of operations for all periods
presented. Three of our wholly-owned operating real estate assets were sold during the first
quarter of 2002. We retained management of two of the three
wholly-owned assets sold at terms commensurate with current market conditions.
Due to our continuing involvement with the operations of the two assets sold that we are
continuing to manage, the operating results of these assets are included in
continuing operations. The operating results for the one wholly-owned asset and
one unconsolidated joint venture asset sold during the first quarter of 2002 are included in
discontinued operations in the statements of operations for all periods
presented. Interest expense has been allocated to the
results of the discontinued operations in accordance with EITF No. 87-24. We had no assets that qualified as held for
disposition as defined by SFAS No. 144 at December 31, 2001 or September 30,
2002.
Condensed financial information of the
results of operations for the real estate assets sold included in discontinued
operations is as follows:
Three
Months |
Nine
Months |
|||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
|||||
Total property revenues Equity in income of joint ventures Total revenues |
$
- |
$669 |
$197 |
$1,973 |
||||
Property operating and maintenance expense Real estate asset depreciation and amortization Interest expense Total expenses |
- - - - |
( 268 ( 141 ( 87 ( 496 |
) ) ) ) |
( 91 ( 48 ( 34 ( 173 |
) |
( 764 ( 420 ( 246 ( 1,430 |
) |
|
Income from discontinued operations | - |
|
202 |
|
69 |
|
632 | |
Gain on disposition of discontinued operations | - | - | 2,945 | - | ||||
Income from discontinued operations |
$ - |
$202 | $3,014 | $632 |
7. EARNINGS PER UNIT
Basic earnings per Unit are computed based on net income available to common Unitholders and the weighted average number of common Units outstanding. Diluted earnings per Unit reflect the assumed issuance of common Units under the Trust's share option and incentive plan. The numerator and denominator used for both basic and diluted earnings per Unit computations are as follows:
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited and Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||||
Basic and diluted income available to common unitholders (numerator): | 2002 | 2001 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||
Income from continuing operations (net of
preferred distributions) - basic and diluted Income from discontinued operations - basic and diluted Income before extraordinary item (net of preferred distributions) - basic and diluted Extraordinary loss - basic and diluted Net income - basic and diluted |
$ |
8,478 - 8,478 - 8,478 |
|
4,553 202 4,755 - 4,755 |
|
45,215 3,014 48,229 (1,687 46,542 |
) |
$ $ $ $ $ |
34,328 632 34,960 - 34,960 |
||
Common Units
(denominator): Average Units outstanding - basic Incremental Units from assumed conversions of: Stock options Other Average Units outstanding - diluted |
30,718 87 7 30,812 |
30,286 187 6 30,479 |
30,662 137 6 30,805 |
30,067 163 6 30,236 |
8. SEGMENT REPORTING
Commitments
We currently have five communities
under development that are expected to comprise 1,246 apartment homes upon
completion and an indirect 20% ownership interest in two development communities
that are expected to comprise 571 apartment homes upon completion. The
estimated costs to complete the development of these assets that we are
obligated to fund total $84 million at September 30, 2002, including $1 million
for the co-investment development communities.
Contingencies
We
are subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary
course of business. These matters are generally covered by
insurance. While the resolution of these matters cannot be predicted with
certainty, we believe that the final outcome of such matters will not have a
material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
We
are the entity through which Gables Residential Trust (the "Trust"),
a real estate investment trust (a "REIT"), conducts substantially
all of its business and owns, either directly or indirectly through
subsidiaries, substantially all of its assets. We are focused
within the multifamily industry in demand-driven markets throughout the United
States that have high job growth and are resilient to economic downturns. Our
operating performance relies predominantly on net operating income from our
apartment communities. Net operating income is determined by rental revenues
and operating expenses, which are affected by the demand and supply dynamics
within our markets. Our performance is also affected by the general
availability and cost of capital and our ability to develop and acquire
additional apartment communities with returns in excess of our blended cost of
capital.
Business Objectives and Strategy
The Trust's objective is to increase shareholder value by producing consistent high quality earnings to sustain dividends and annual total returns that exceed the multifamily sector average. To achieve that objective, we employ a number of business strategies. First, our long-term investment strategy is research-driven, with the objective of creating a portfolio of high quality assets in approximately six to eight strategically selected markets that are complementary through economic diversity and characterized by high job growth and resiliency to national economic downturns. We believe such a portfolio will provide predictable growth in operating cash flow on a sustainable basis. Second, we adhere to a strategy of owning and operating high quality, class AA/A apartment communities
under the Gables brand. We believe that such communities, when located in highly desirable areas to live and supplemented with high quality service and amenities, attract the affluent renter-by-choice who is willing to pay a premium for location preference, superior service and high quality communities. The resulting portfolio should maintain high levels of occupancy and rental rates. This, coupled with more predictable operating expenses and reduced capital expenditure requirements associated with high quality construction materials, should lead to operating margins that exceed national averages for the multifamily sector and sustainable growth in operating cash flow. Third, our aim is to be recognized as the employer of choice within the industry. Our mission of Taking Care of the Way People Live is a cornerstone of our strategy, involving innovative human resource practices that we believe will attract and retain the highest caliber associates. Because of our long-established presence as a fully in
tegrated apartment management, development, construction, acquisition and disposition company within our markets, we have the ability to offer multi-faceted career opportunities among the various disciplines within the industry. Finally, our capital strategy is to maximize return on invested capital while maintaining financial flexibility through a conservative, investment grade credit profile. We judiciously manage our capital and are able to recycle existing capital through asset
dispositions.
We believe we are well positioned to continue achieving our objectives because of our long-established presence as a fully integrated real estate company in our markets. This local market presence creates a competitive advantage in generating increased cash flow from (1) property operations during different economic cycles and (2) new investment opportunities that involve site selection, market information and requests for entitlements and zoning petitions.
Portfolio-wide occupancy levels and rental rates
have declined slightly as a result of national economic
weakness, coupled with low mortgage rates which have resulted in an increase in
home purchases by apartment residents. We expect portfolio-wide rental
expenses for 2002 to increase at a rate ahead of inflation due in part to a
significant increase in insurance costs, along with higher turnover and marketing costs
associated with the current national economic conditions. In addition,
we expect property revenues on a same-store basis to be lower in 2002 than in
2001. We expect operating fundamentals for our business will improve when
job growth improves in our markets. The job growth prospects for our
markets are partially related to national economic conditions. It is
uncertain whether, and to what extent, the national economy and related job
growth will improve in 2003.
Our ongoing evaluation of the growth prospects for a specific asset may result in a determination to dispose of the asset. In that event, we would intend to sell the asset and utilize the net proceeds from any such sale to invest in new assets expected to have better growth prospects, reduce indebtedness or, in certain circumstances with appropriate approval from
the Trust's board of trustees, repurchase outstanding common shares. We maintain staffing levels sufficient to meet existing construction,
acquisition and leasing activities. When market conditions warrant, we
adjust staffing levels to mitigate a negative impact on results of operations.
Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Actual results or developments could differ materially from those projected in such statements as a result of certain factors set forth in the section entitled "Certain Factors Affecting Future Operating Results" and elsewhere in this report. The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
Common and Preferred Equity Activity
Secondary Common Share Offerings
Since the IPO, the Trust has issued a total of 14,831 common shares in eight offerings, generating $347,771 in net proceeds which were generally used (1) to reduce outstanding indebtedness under interim financing vehicles utilized to fund our development and acquisition activities and (2) for general working capital purposes, including funding of future development and acquisition activities.
Preferred Share Issuances and Redemptions
On July 24, 1997, the Trust issued 4,600 shares of 8.30% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares (liquidation preference $25.00 per share). The net proceeds from this offering of $111.0 million were used to reduce outstanding indebtedness under interim financing vehicles.
On August 9, 2002, the Trust redeemed the Series A Preferred Shares at $25.00 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends.
On June 18, 1998, the Trust issued 180 shares of 5.0% Series Z Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares (liquidation preference $25.00 per share) in connection with the acquisition of a parcel of land for future development. The Series Z Preferred Shares, which are subject to mandatory redemption on June 18, 2018, may be redeemed
at our option at any time for $25.00 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends. The Series Z Preferred Shares are not subject to any sinking fund or convertible into any other
securities of the Trust.
On September 27, 2002, the Trust issued 1,600 shares of 7.875% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares
(liquidation preference $25.00 per share) in a private placement. The net proceeds from
this issuance of $39.8 million, together with the net proceeds from the concurrent issuance of
$40 million of senior unsecured notes, were used to retire $82.5
million of senior unsecured notes at an interest rate of
8.3% that were scheduled to mature in December 2002. The Series C
Preferred Shares may be redeemed at $25.00 per share plus accrued and unpaid
dividends on or after September 30, 2006. The Series C Preferred Shares are not subject to
any sinking fund or convertible into any other securities of the Trust.
Issuances of Common Operating Partnership Units
Since the IPO, we have issued a total of 4,421 Units in
connection with the 1998 acquisition of the real estate assets and operations of
South Florida, the acquisition of other operating apartment communities and the acquisition of a parcel of land for future development.
Issuance of Preferred Operating Partnership Units
On November 12, 1998, we issued 2,000 of
our 8.625% Series B Preferred Units to an institutional investor. The net proceeds from this issuance of $48.7 million were used to reduce outstanding indebtedness under interim financing vehicles.
We have the option to redeem the Series B Preferred Units after November 14, 2003. These Units are exchangeable by the holder into 8.625% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of
the Trust on a one-for-one basis; however, this exchange right is generally not exercisable until after November 14, 2008. The Series B Preferred Units have no stated
maturity, sinking fund or mandatory redemption.
Common Equity Repurchase Program
We have a common equity repurchase
program pursuant to which the Trust is authorized to purchase up to $150
million of its outstanding common shares or Units. The Trust has
repurchased shares from time to time in open market and privately negotiated
transactions, depending on market prices and other conditions, using proceeds
from sales of selected assets. Whenever the Trust same terms and for the same
aggregate price. After redemption the Units redeemed by us are no longer
deemed outstanding. Units have also been repurchased for cash upon their
presentation for redemption by unitholders. As of September 30, 2002, we had
redeemed 4,476 Units, including 4,181 Units redeemed by
the Trust, for a total of $107,814, including related commissions of $167.
Shelf Registration Statement
We have an effective shelf registration statement on file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission that currently provides $500 million of equity capacity. The
debt portion of this shelf registration statement has been fully utilized after
our February 2001 and July 2002 senior unsecured note offerings.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
Portfolio and Other Financing Activity
Community Dispositions Subject to Discontinued Operations Reporting
In January 2002, we sold an operating
apartment community in Houston comprising 256 apartment homes. The net proceeds
from this sale were $15.3 million and were used to paydown outstanding
borrowings under our credit facilities. The gain from the sale of this
community was $2.2 million.
In March 2002, the Gables Residential
Apartment Portfolio JV (the "GRAP JV") sold an operating apartment
community located in Houston comprising 382 apartment homes for $31.0
million. Our share of the net sales proceeds after repayment of
construction loan indebtedness of $14.0 million was $3.1 million, resulting in a
gain of $0.7 million.
Historical operating results and gains are reflected in discontinued
operations. See Notes 5 and 6 to the accompanying consolidated financial
statements for further discussion.
Community and Land Dispositions Not Subject to Discontinued Operations Reporting
In January 2002, we sold (i) a 13.3
acre parcel of land in Houston that was adjacent to the 256 apartment home
community sold and (ii) an operating apartment community in Houston comprising
246 apartment homes. In March 2002, we sold an operating apartment
community in Atlanta comprising 311 apartment homes. The net proceeds from
these sales were $46.8 million and were used to paydown outstanding borrowings
under our credit facilities. The gain from the land sale was $0.8 million
and the aggregate gain from the sale of the two communities was $17.9 million.
In March 2002, the GRAP JV sold an
operating apartment community located in South Florida comprising 320 apartment
homes for $27.7 million. Our share of the net sales proceeds after
repayment of construction loan indebtedness of $11.4 million was $3.0 million,
resulting in a gain of $1.0 million.
The GRAP JV sold an
operating apartment community located in Dallas comprising 222 apartment
homes in July 2002 and an operating apartment
community in South Florida comprising 290 apartment homes in September 2002. The aggregate
sales price for these two communities was $45.4 million. Our share of the
net sales proceeds after repayment of construction loan indebtedness of $21.2
million was $4.6 million, resulting in a gain of $0.9 million.
During 2001, we contributed our interest in certain land and development rights
to the Gables Residential Apartment Portfolio JV Two (the "GRAP JV
Two") in return for (1) cash of $18.5 million and (2) capital account
credit of $4.6 million. The $2.8 million of gain we have recorded associated with this contribution
was recognized when earned using
the percentage of completion method since we serve as the developer and general
contractor for the joint venture. As of September 30, 2002, we had
recognized $2.8 million of this gain. We recognized $0.3 million and $0.4 million of this gain
during the three months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively, and
$1.2
million and $1.2 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001,
respectively.
In addition, during the three months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, we recognized
$0.0 million and $0.1 million, respectively, of deferred
gain associated with a parcel of land we sold in 2000. During the nine months
ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, we recognized $0.1 million and $0.6 million,
respectively, of deferred gain associated with this land sale.
During 2001, we sold an apartment community located in Atlanta comprising
386 apartment homes, an apartment community located in Houston comprising 776
apartment homes, an apartment community located in Dallas comprising 536
apartment homes and a 2.5 acre parcel of land adjacent to one of our development
communities located in Atlanta. The net proceeds from these sales totaled
$93.6 million, $9 million of which was deposited into an escrow account and used
to fund acquisition activities. The balance of the net proceeds was used
to repay a $16 million note assumed in connection with our September 2001
acquisition of the Gables State Thomas Ravello community and to paydown
outstanding borrowings under interim financing vehicles. The gain from the land
sale was $0.9 million and the aggregate gain from the sale of previously depreciated operating real estate
assets was $34.1 million, all of which was recognized in 2001.
Historical operating results and gains are reflected in continuing
operations. See Notes 5 and 6 to the accompanying consolidated financial
statements for further discussion.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
Community Acquisitions
On September 28, 2001, we acquired the 80%
membership interest of our venture partner in the GRAP JV in the Gables State
Thomas Ravello apartment community located in Dallas comprising 290 apartment
homes. In consideration for such community, we paid $12 million in cash and
assumed a $16 million secured variable-rate note. This consideration was based
on a valuation of the asset of $31 million and is net of our $3 million share of
the venture distribution. We recorded a $5 million charge to unusual items in
the third quarter of 2001 associated with the write-off of building components
that are being replaced in connection with a remediation program to address
water infiltration issues plaguing the asset.
On August 28, 2001, we acquired an apartment community located in
Washington, D.C. comprising 82 apartment homes for approximately $25 million.
On August 1, 2001, we acquired the 75% interest of our venture partner in
the Gables Metropolitan Uptown apartment community located in Houston comprising
318 apartment homes. The asset was valued at approximately $27 million.
On March 30, 2001, we acquired the 80% membership interests of our venture
partner in the GRAP JV in the Gables Palma Vista and Gables San Michelle II
apartment communities located in South Florida comprising 532 apartment homes
for $66 million. This cash consideration was based on a valuation of the assets
of $75 million and is net of our $9 million share of the venture distribution.
Other Acquisition
In May 2001, we acquired a property
management company based in Washington, D.C. that managed approximately 3,600
units in 24 multifamily apartment communities located in Washington, D.C. and
the surrounding area at the time of the acquisition (the "D.C. Management Co."). The total
investment is approximately $1.6 million and is structured to be paid in three
installments based on results of the acquired business operations.
Senior Unsecured Note Issuance
On February 22, 2001, we issued $150 million of senior unsecured notes which
bear interest at an annual rate of 7.25%, were priced to yield 7.29% and mature in February 2006.
The net proceeds of $148.5 million were used to reduce borrowings under our
unsecured credit facilities and repay our $40 million term loan, which had a
November 2001 maturity date.
On July 8, 2002, we issued $180 million of
senior unsecured notes which bear interest at an annual rate of 5.75%, were
priced to yield 5.81% and mature in July 2007. The net proceeds of $178
million were used to redeem all outstanding shares of the 8.3% Series A
Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares totaling $115 million on August 9, 2002 and to reduce borrowings under our
unsecured credit facilities.
On September 27, 2002, we issued $40 million of senior unsecured
notes in two tranches in a private placement: $30 million at an annual rate of 5.86% maturing in
September 2009, and $10 million at an annual rate of 6.10% maturing in September
2010. The net proceeds of $39.8 million, together with the net proceeds
from the concurrent issuance of Series C Preferred Shares, were used to retire
$82.5 million of senior unsecured notes at an interest rate of 8.3% that were
scheduled to mature in December 2002. We did not incur any prepayment
costs in connection with the early debt retirement.
Debt Refinancing
In May 2002, we called $48.4 million of
secured tax-exempt bond indebtedness with an interest rate of 6.375% and
re-issued the bonds on an unsecured basis at a rate of 4.75%. In
connection with the early extinguishment of debt, we incurred a prepayment
penalty of $1,451 and wrote-off unamortized deferred financing costs totaling
$236. Such charges totaling $1,687 are reflected as an extraordinary loss
in the statements of operations. The previous bonds required monthly principal amortization
payments that were retained in an escrow account and were not applied to reduce
the outstanding principal balance of the loan. Such principal payments
held in escrow totaling $4,121 were released in May 2002. This refinancing
transaction allowed us to improve our debt constant by 2.75%, unencumber nine communities comprising 2,028 apartment homes and achieve a positive net present
value result.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
Critical Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Our financial
statements are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted
accounting principles ("GAAP") and a summary of our significant accounting
policies is included in Notes 4 and 5 to the consolidated financial statements
included in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001. Notes 5 and 6 to
the accompanying consolidated financial statements include a summary of recent accounting pronouncements and their
actual or expected impact on our financial statements. Our preparation of the
financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of our financial statements, and the reported
amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. There can be
no assurance that actual results will not differ from these estimates. As
an owner, operator and developer of apartment communities, our critical
accounting policies relate to cost capitalization and asset impairment
evaluation.
Cost Capitalization
As a vertically
integrated real estate company, we have in-house investment professionals
involved in development, construction and acquisition. We include direct
costs associated with development and construction activities in the capitalized
development cost of wholly-owned assets. We charge direct costs associated
with development and construction activities for third parties and
unconsolidated joint ventures against our revenues from the services being
provided. Such costs are ultimately reflected in net development
revenues using the percentage of completion method. As required by GAAP,
we expense all internal costs associated with the acquisition of operating
apartment communities to general and administrative expense in the period such
costs are incurred. We maintain staffing levels sufficient to meet
existing development, construction and acquisition activities. When market
conditions warrant, we adjust staffing levels to mitigate a negative impact on
results of operations.
Our real estate development pursuits are
subject to our obtaining permits and other governmental approvals, as well as our ongoing
business review of the underlying real estate fundamentals and the impact on our
capital structure. We do not always move forward with development of our
real estate pursuits, and therefore, we evaluate the viability of real estate
pursuits and the recoverability of capitalized pursuit costs regularly. Based on this periodic review, we expense any costs that are deemed unrealizable
at that time to general and administrative expense.
During the development and construction of
a new apartment community, we capitalize related interest costs, as well as
other carrying costs such as property taxes and insurance. We begin to
expense these items as the construction of the community becomes substantially
complete and the residential apartment homes become available for initial
occupancy. Accordingly, we gradually reduce the amounts we capitalize as
construction is being completed. During the lease-up period, as a
community transitions from initial occupancy to stabilized occupancy, revenues
are generally insufficient to cover interest, carrying costs and operating
expenses. The size and duration of this lease-up deficit depends on how
quickly construction is completed, how quickly the apartments available for
occupancy are leased, and what rent levels are achieved at the community.
Asset Impairment Evaluation
Under GAAP, real estate assets are stated
at the lower of depreciated cost or fair value, if deemed impaired. As
noted above, the cost of buildings and improvements includes interest, property
taxes, insurance, and allocated development overhead incurred during the
construction period. Ordinary repairs and maintenance are expensed as
incurred; major replacements and betterments are capitalized and depreciated
over their estimated useful lives. Depreciation is computed on a
straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of 20-40 years for buildings
and improvements and 5 years for furniture, fixtures and equipment.
As required by GAAP, we periodically evaluate our real estate assets to
determine if there has been any impairment in their carrying value and record
impairment losses if there are indicators of impairment and the undiscounted
cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets
carrying amounts. At September 30, 2002, we did not own any real estate
assets that meet the impairment criteria.
Discontinued Operations
We adopted SFAS No. 144 effective
January 1, 2002 which requires, among other things, that the operating results
of certain real estate assets which have been sold subsequent to January 1, 2002,
or otherwise qualify as held for disposition (as defined by SFAS No. 144), be included
in
discontinued operations in the statements of operations for all periods
presented. Three of our wholly-owned operating real estate assets were sold during the first
quarter of 2002. We retained management of two of the three
wholly-owned assets sold at terms commensurate with current market conditions.
Due to our
continuing involvement with the operations of the two assets sold that we are
continuing to manage, the operating results of these assets are included in
continuing operations. The operating results for the one wholly-owned asset and
one unconsolidated joint venture asset sold during the first quarter of 2002 are included in
discontinued operations in the statements of operations for all periods
presented. Interest expense has been allocated to the
results of the discontinued operations in accordance with EITF No. 87-24. We had no assets that qualified as held for
disposition as defined by SFAS No. 144 at December 31, 2001 or September 30,
2002.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
Condensed financial information of the
results of operations for the real estate assets sold included in discontinued
operations is as follows:
Three
Months |
Nine
Months |
|||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
|||||
Total property revenues Equity in income of joint ventures Total revenues |
$
- |
$669 |
$197 |
$1,973 |
||||
Property operating and maintenance expense Real estate asset depreciation and amortization Interest expense Total expenses |
- - - - |
(
268 ( 141 ( 87 ( 496 |
) |
(
91 ( 48 ( 34 ( 173 |
) |
( 764 ( 420 ( 246 (1,430 |
) |
|
Income from discontinued operations | - |
|
202 |
|
69 |
|
632 | |
Gain on disposition of discontinued operations | - |
|
- | 2,945 | - | |||
Income from discontinued operations |
$ - |
$202 | $3,014 | $632 |
Results of Operations
Comparison of operating results for the three months ended September 30, 2002 (the
"2002 Period") to the three months ended September 30, 2001 (the "2001 Period").
Our net income is generated primarily from the operation of our apartment communities. For purposes of evaluating comparative operating performance, we categorize our operating communities based on the period each community reaches stabilized occupancy. A community is considered to have achieved stabilized occupancy on the earlier to occur of (1) attainment of 93% physical occupancy or (2) one year after completion of construction. The operating performance for all of our wholly-owned apartment communities combined for the three
months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 is summarized as follows:
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
Three Months
Ended September 30, 2002 2001 |
||||||
$ Change |
% Change
|
|||||
Rental and other property revenues: Same store communities (a) Communities stabilized during the 2002 Period, but not during the 2001 Period (b) Triple net master lease communities (c) Development and lease-up communities (d) Renovation communities (e) Acquired communities (f) Sold communities (g) Total property revenues |
$46,851 814 1,646 2,085 3,520 1,597 - $56,513 |
$47,987 737 1,797 447 4,211 853 3,673 $59,705 |
$ ( 1,136 77 ( 151 1,638 ( 691 744 ( 3,673 $( 3,192 |
) ) ) ) ) |
( 2.4% 10.4% ( 8.4% 366.4% ( 16.4% 87.2% ( 100.0% ( 5.3% |
|
Property operating and maintenance expenses |
|
|
|
) |
|
) |
Revenues in excess of specified expenses |
$34,965 |
$39,221 |
$( 4,256 |
) |
( 10.9% |
) |
Revenues in excess of specified
expenses as a |
|
|
|
|
) |
|
(a) Communities that were owned and fully stabilized throughout both the
2002 Period and the 2001 Period ("same store"). (b) Communities that were stabilized during all of the 2002 Period, but were not stabilized during all of the 2001 Period. (c) Communities that were subject to a triple net master lease agreement throughout both the 2002 Period and the 2001 Period. (d) Communities in the development and/or lease-up phase that were not fully stabilized during all or any of the 2002 Period. (e) Communities that were in renovation subsequent to July 1, 2001. (f) Communities that were acquired subsequent to July 1, 2001. (g) Communities that were sold subsequent to July 1, 2001 that are not included in discontinued operations. |
Total property revenues
decreased $3,192, or 5.3%, from $59,705 to $56,513 due to 2001 and 2002 sales of
apartment communities that are not reflected in discontinued operations, a
decrease in the number of available apartment homes due to renovations, and a
decrease in same-store performance as a result of national economic weakness. These decreases were
partially offset by an increase in the number of
apartment homes resulting from the development and acquisition of additional
communities. Below is additional data regarding the changes in total property revenues for
two of the seven community categories presented in the preceding table:
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
Same store communities:
Market |
Number of Communities |
Number of Apartment Homes |
% of 2002 Period NOI |
Physical Occupancy During the 2002 Period |
Change in Physical Occupancy |
$ Change in Revenues |
% Change in Revenues | |||
South Florida |
15 16 14 7 7 4 63 |
4,377 5,020 3,613 1,677 1,423 1,243 17,353 |
29.3% 26.4% 18.7% 11.1% 9.5% 5.0% 100.0% |
93.8% 93.6% 92.3% 94.8% 94.8% 91.7% 93.6% |
( 0.7% |
) |
$ 36 166 ( 764 ( 325 ( 166 ( 83 $(1,136 |
) ) ) ) ) |
0.3% |
|
Development and lease-up communities:
|
Number of Communities |
Number of Apartment Homes |
% of Total Apartment Homes |
Physical Occupancy During the 2002 Period |
Change in Revenues |
Orlando Houston Atlanta Dallas Totals |
1 1 2 1 5 |
315 296 263 245 1,119 |
28.2% 26.4% 23.5% 21.9% 100.0% |
73.1% 63.7% 53.8% 10.0% 48.8% |
$
312 555 689 82 $1,638 |
Property management revenues increased $153, or
9.6%, from $1,598 to $1,751 due primarily to an increase in the number of units
managed.
Development revenues, net, remained steady,
with a nominal decrease of $11, or
7.6%, from $144 to $133.
Our share of the operating results for the apartment communities in which we have a joint venture interest for
the
2002 Period and 2001 Period is as follows:
2002 Period |
|||||
Stabilized (a) |
Development
|
Sales (c) |
Total |
2001 |
Gables' share of joint venture results: |
|
|
$ 331 ( 124 $ 207 ( 57 ( 8 ( 3 $ 139 - ( 119 $ 20 2 3 780 61 |
) ) ) ) ) % |
|
|
$1,149 ( 472 $ 677 ( 232 ( 17 ( 7 $421 857 ( 347 $ 931 35 10 3,190 85 |
|
$1,176 ( 599 $ 577 ( 307 ( 11 3 $ 262 - ( 273 $( 11 45 11 3,658 76 |
|
(a) Communities that were owned and fully stabilized throughout
the 2002 Period. (b) Communities in the development and/or lease-up phase that were not fully stabilized during all or any of the 2002 Period. (c) Communities that were sold subsequent to July 1, 2002 that are not included in discontinued operations. |
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
Interest income
decreased $28, or 15.3%, from $183 to $155 due to a decrease in interest-bearing
deposits and a decrease in interest rates.
Other revenues increased $360, or 41.8%,
from $862 to $1,222 due to income earned during the 2002 Period related to certain non-routine
items, partially offset by decreases related to our third-party brokerage and
corporate rental housing services.
Property operating and maintenance expense (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization) increased $1,064, or 5.2%, from $20,484 to $21,548 due to an increase in the number of apartment homes resulting from the development and
acquisition of additional communities, as well as same-store expenses increasing
4.6%. This increase is at a rate ahead of inflation due to a significant
increase in insurance costs, along with higher turnover
and marketing costs associated with the current national economic conditions. This
increase is offset in part by the 2001 and 2002 sales of apartment communities
that are not reflected in discontinued operations.
Real estate depreciation and amortization
expense decreased $1,044, or 8.9%, from $11,780 to $10,736 due to a
non-recurring correcting adjustment recorded to depreciation in the 2002 Period
of $1.7 million and the
impact of the 2001 and 2002 sales of apartment communities that are not
reflected in discontinued operations. These
decreases are partially offset by
the impact of the development and acquisition of additional communities and capital improvements made to existing operating
communities.
Property management expense for owned communities and third party properties on a combined basis increased $89, or 3.2%, from $2,799 to $2,888 due to inflationary increases in expenses. We allocate property management expenses to both owned communities and third-party properties based on the proportionate share of total apartment homes and units managed.
Interest expense and credit enhancement fees increased $981 or 8.7%, from $11,289 to $12,270 due primarily to an increase in outstanding indebtedness associated with the redemption of the Series A Preferred Shares and an increase in operating debt associated with the development and acquisition of additional communities. These increases have been offset in part by a decrease in outstanding indebtedness associated with the 2001 and 2002 sales of apartment communities and a decrease in interest rates.
General and administrative expense
increased $223 or 12.2%, from $1,829 to $2,052 due primarily to abandoned real
estate pursuit costs expensed during the 2002 Period.
Corporate asset depreciation and
amortization increased $178, or 78.4%, from $227 to $405 due primarily to an increase
in amortization resulting from the depreciation of
our new general ledger and web-based property management system,
eGables, beginning January 2002.
Unusual items of $6,247 in the 2001 Period
is comprised of (1) a $5,006 charge associated with the write-off of building
components at Gables State Thomas Ravello that are being replaced in connection
with a remediation program, (2) $520 in reserves associated with certain
technology investments, and (3) $721 of abandoned real estate pursuit costs as a
result of September 2001 events which impacted the U.S. economy.
Gain on sale of land and development rights of
$267 in the 2002 Period relates to
recognition of deferred gain associated with the 2001 contribution of
land and development rights into the GRAP JV Two.
Gain on sale of land and development
rights of $515 in the 2001 Period is comprised of (1) $396 associated with the
2001 contribution of land and development rights into the GRAP JV Two and (2) recognition of $119 of deferred gain associated with a land sale in 2000.
Comparison of operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 (the "2002 Period")
to the nine months ended September 30, 2001 (the
"2001 Period").
Our net income is generated primarily from
the operation of our apartment communities. For purposes of evaluating
comparative operating performance, we categorize our operating communities based
on the period each community reaches stabilized occupancy. A community is
considered to have achieved stabilized occupancy on the earlier to occur of (1)
attainment of 93% physical occupancy or (2) one year after completion of
construction. The operating performance for all of our wholly-owned apartment
communities combined for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 is
summarized as follows:
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
Nine
Months |
|||||||||
$ Change |
% Change |
||||||||
Rental and other property revenues: Same store communities (a) Communities stabilized during the 2002 Period, but not during the 2001 Period (b) Triple net master lease communities (c) Development and lease-up communities (d) Renovation communities (e) Acquired communities (f) Sold communities (g) Total property revenues |
|
|
$ $ |
|
$ $ |
|
|
|
|
Property operating and maintenance expenses |
|
|
$ $ |
|
$ $ |
|
|
|
|
Revenues in excess of specified expenses |
$ |
108,591 |
$ |
116,184 |
$ |
( 7,593 |
) |
( 6.5% |
) |
Revenues in excess of specified
expenses as a |
|
|
|
|
) |
||||
(a)
Communities that were owned and fully stabilized throughout both the
2002 Period and the 2001 Period ("same store"). (b) Communities that were stabilized during all of the 2002 Period, but were not stabilized during all of the 2001 Period. (c) Communities that were subject to a triple net master lease agreement throughout both the 2002 Period and the 2001 Period. (d) Communities in the development and/or lease-up phase that were not fully stabilized during all or any of the 2002 Period. (e) Communities that were in renovation subsequent to January 1, 2001. (f) Communities that were acquired subsequent to January 1, 2001. (g) Communities that were sold subsequent to January 1, 2001 that are not included in discontinued operations. |
Total property revenues decreased
$3,934, or 2.3%, from $173,251 to $169,317 due to 2001 and 2002 sales of apartment communities that
are not reflected in discontinued operations, a decrease in the number of
available apartment homes due to renovations and a decrease in same-store
performance as a result of national economic weakness. These decreases
were partially offset by an increase in the number of apartment homes resulting from
the development and acquisition of additional communities. Below is additional data
regarding the changes in total property revenues for two of the seven community
categories presented in the preceding table:
Same store communities:
Market |
Number of |
Number of Apartment Homes |
% of 2002 Period NOI |
Physical Occupancy During the 2002 Period |
Change in Physical Occupancy |
$
Change in Revenues |
% Change in Revenues |
Houston |
16 |
5,020 3,845 3,613 1,677 1,423 1,243 16,821 |
27.9% 24.6% 20.2% 12.2% 10.0% 5.1% 100.0%
|
93.8% 94.4% 91.9% 92.9% 95.3% 90.6% 93.4% |
(1.0%) (0.4%) (2.4%) (0.8%) (1.3%) (2.4%) (1.2%) |
$1,417 581 ( 1,675 ( 929 ( 221 ( 393 $(1,220 |
|
3.9% 1.8% ( 6.0% ( 5.2% ( 1.6% ( 5.0% ( 0.9% |
|
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
Development and lease-up communities:
Market |
Number of Communities |
Number of Apartment Homes |
% of Total Apartment Homes |
Physical Occupancy During the 2002 Period |
Change in Revenues |
Orlando |
1 |
315 |
24.3% |
61.0% |
$1,134 |
Property management revenues increased
$850, or 18.8%, from $4,524 to $5,374
due primarily to the May 2001 acquisition of the D.C. Management Co.
2002 Period |
||||||||||
|
Stabilized (a) |
Development |
Sales (c) |
Total |
2001 |
|||||
$ 1,969 ( 840 $ 1,129 ( 448 ( 17 ( 16 $ 648 - ( 520 $ 128 113 5 1,898 92% |
|
$ 660 ( 306 $ 354 ( 111 ( 21 ( 6 $216 - ( 244 $( 28 5 3 780 37% |
|
$ 911 ( 389 $ 522 ( 125 ( 13 ( 5 $ 379 1,864 (276 $1,967 46 3 832 94% |
|
$3,540 (1,535 $ 2,005 ( 684 ( 51 ( 27 $1,243 1,864 ( 1,040 $ 2,067 164 11 3,510 80% |
|
$4,295 ( 1,829 $ 2,466 ( 1,272 ( 50 18 $1,162 - ( 1,136 $ 26 99 13 4,190 78% |
|
|
(a) Communities
that were owned and fully stabilized throughout the
2002 Period. (b) Communities in the development and/or lease-up phase that were not fully stabilized during all or any of the 2002 Period. (c) Communities that were sold subsequent to January 1, 2002 that are not included in discontinued operations. |
Interest income decreased $301, or
47.3%, from $637 to $336 due to a decrease in interest-bearing deposits
and a decrease in interest rates.
Other revenues increased $1,116, or 60.1%, from
$1,857 to $2,973
due to an increase in revenues from our third-party brokerage and corporate
rental housing services and income earned during the 2002 Period related
to certain non-routine items.
Property operating and maintenance expense (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization) increased $3,659, or 6.4%, from $57,067 to $60,726 due to an
increase in the number of apartment homes
resulting from the development and acquisition of additional communities, as
well as same-store expenses increasing 6.2%. This increase is at a rate ahead of inflation due to
a significant increase in insurance costs, along with higher turnover and marketing costs
associated with the current national economic conditions. This increase is offset in part by the 2001 and
2002 sales of apartment communities that are not reflected in discontinued
operations.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
Real estate depreciation and amortization expense increased
$935, or 2.8%, from $33,996 to $34,931 due primarily to the impact of the development and
acquisition of additional communities and capital improvements made to existing
operating communities, offset by the impact of the 2001 and 2002 sales of apartment
communities that are not reflected in discontinued operations and a non-recurring correcting adjustment recorded to depreciation in the
2002 Period of $1.7 million.
Property management expense for owned communities and third party properties on
a combined basis increased $1,665, or 20.9%, from $7,965 to $9,630 due primarily to
the May 2001 acquisition of the D.C. Management Co. and certain software
licensing fees incurred in the 2002 Period. We allocate property
management expenses to both owned communities and third party properties based
on the proportionate share of total apartment homes and units managed.
Interest expense and credit enhancement fees decreased
$910, or 2.7%, from $33,660 to $32,750 due primarily to a decrease in
outstanding indebtedness associated with the 2001 and 2002 sales of apartment
communities and a decrease in interest rates. These decreases are offset
in part by an increase in outstanding indebtedness associated with the
redemption of the Series A Preferred Shares and an increase in operating debt
associated with the development and
acquisition of additional communities.
General and administrative expense
increased $341, or 6.3%, from $5,386 to $5,727 due primarily to abandoned real
estate pursuit costs expensed during the 2002 Period.
Corporate asset depreciation and
amortization increased $719, or 126.8%, from $567 to $1,286 due to (1) an increase
in amortization resulting from the management contracts acquired in connection
with the May 2001 acquisition of the D.C. Management Co. and (2) the
depreciation of our new general ledger and web-based property management system,
eGables, beginning January 2002.
Unusual items of $6,647 in the 2001 Period
is comprised of (1) a $5,006 charge associated with the write-off of building
components at Gables State Thomas Ravello that are being replaced in connection
with a remediation program, (2) $920 in reserves associated with certain
technology investments, and (3) $721 of abandoned real estate pursuit costs as a
result of September 2001 events which impacted the U.S. economy.
Gain on sale of previously depreciated
operating real estate assets of $17,906 in the 2002 Period relates to the sale
of two wholly-owned communities comprising 557 apartment homes located in
Houston and Atlanta in the 2002 Period.
Gain on sale of land and development rights
of $2,068 in the 2002 Period is comprised of (1) $763 associated with the sale
of 13.3 acres of land in Houston in the 2002 Period, (2) recognition of $1,220 in
deferred gain associated with the contribution of land and development rights
into the GRAP JV Two in the 2002 Period, and (3) recognition of $85 of deferred
gain associated with a land sale in 2000.
Gain on sale of previously depreciated
operating real estate assets of $7,386 in the 2001 Period is related to the sale of an apartment community in Atlanta comprising
386 apartment homes.
Gain on sale of land and development rights
of $2,733 in the 2001 Period is comprised of (1) $944 associated with the sale of 2.5 acres of
land in Atlanta in the 2001 Period, (2) $1,143 associated with the contribution of
land and development rights into the GRAP JV Two in the 2001 period and (3) recognition of $646 of
deferred gain associated with a land sale in 2000.
Income from discontinued operations increased
$2,382, or 376.9%, from $632 to $3,014 due primarily
to the $2,945 gain on disposition of discontinued operations recognized in the 2002 Period.
Extraordinary loss from early
extinguishment of debt of $1,687 in the 2002 Period
represents the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs totaling $236
and a prepayment penalty of $1,451 associated with the early retirement of $48.4
million of secured tax-exempt bond indebtedness. These bonds had an
interest rate of 6.375% which we were able to reissue on an unsecured basis at
a rate of 4.75%, resulting in a positive net present value.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net cash provided by operating
activities from continuing operations decreased from $81,052 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2001 to $80,812 for the nine months ended September 30, 2002
due to a decrease of $6,923 in income from continuing operations (a) before certain non-cash or non-operating items, including depreciation, amortization, equity in income of joint
ventures, gain on sale of real estate assets, long-term compensation expense,
extraordinary loss, and unusual items and (b) after operating distributions received from
joint ventures. This decrease was offset in part by (1) a change in other assets between periods of
$3,796, (2) a change
in restricted cash between periods of $1,028, and (3) a change in other liabilities between periods of
$1,859. Net
cash provided by operating activities from discontinued operations decreased from
$1,292 to $194 due to the disposition of discontinued operations in the 2002
Period.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
We had $150,509 of net cash used in investing
activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 compared to $20,228 of net
cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30,
2002. During the nine months
ended September 30, 2002, we expended $73.8 million related to acquisition, development,
construction and
renovation expenditures, $9.8 million related to recurring value retention
capital expenditures for operating apartment communities, $7.7 million
related to non-recurring and/or value-enhancing capital expenditures for
operating apartment communities, $1.0 million related to our investment in joint
ventures, and $1.0 million related to other investments. During the nine
months ended September 30, 2002, we received
cash of (1) $46.8 million in connection with the sale of wholly-owned real
estate assets, (2) $18.4 million in connection with the disposition of
discontinued operations, (3) $7.6 million in connection with our share of the net proceeds from the sale of joint venture real estate
assets, and (4) $0.3 million in connection with restricted cash released from
escrow.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2001, we expended $190.9 million related to
acquisition, development, construction and renovation expenditures, $9.2 million related to recurring
value retention capital expenditures for operating apartment communities, $8.8 million related to non-recurring and/or value-enhancing capital
expenditures for operating apartment communities, $3.2 million related to our investment in joint ventures, and $4.0 million related to other
investments. During the nine months ended September 30, 2001, we received cash of (1)
$18.4 million in connection with our contribution of interests in certain land and development rights to
the
GRAP JV Two and (2) $39.4 million in connection with the sale of wholly-owned
real estate assets. In addition, during the nine months ended
September 30, 2001, $7.9 million of sales proceeds were released from escrow
to fund development activities.
We had $64,849 of net cash provided by financing
activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 compared to $60,240 of net cash used in financing activities for the
nine months ended September 30, 2002. During the nine months ended
September 30, 2002, we expended (1) $115.0 million in connection with the
redemption of the Series A Preferred Shares, (2) $64.9 million in common and
preferred distributions, (3) $5.8 million in connection with Unit redemptions
related to treasury share repurchases and Unit redemptions for cash, (4) $3.0 million in deferred
financing costs and (5) $1.5 million for a prepayment penalty incurred in
connection with our tax-exempt debt refinancing. During the nine months
ended September 30, 2002, we received proceeds of (1) $79.0 million in net
borrowings, (2) $39.8 million from the issuance of the Series C Preferred
Shares, (3) $7.6 million from the exercise of share options and (4) $3.5
million from principal payments released from escrow, net. During the
nine months ended September 30, 2001, we had net borrowings of $116.0 million
and proceeds from the exercise of share options of $14.0 million. These
net borrowings and share option proceeds were offset by payments for common
and preferred distributions totaling $62.8 million and deferred
financing costs of $1.9 million.
The Trust has elected to be taxed as a REIT under
the Internal Revenue Code. To qualify as a REIT, the Trust must meet a number of
organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that it
currently distribute at least 90% of the REIT's ordinary taxable income to
shareholders. It is the current intention of the Trust to adhere to these requirements
and maintain its REIT status. As a REIT, the Trust generally will not be subject
to federal income tax on distributed taxable income. We utilize Gables
Residential Services, a taxable REIT subsidiary, to provide management and other
services to third parties that we, as a REIT, may be prohibited from providing.
Taxable REIT subsidiaries are subject to federal, state and local income taxes.
As of September 30, 2002, we had total
indebtedness of $956,280, cash and cash equivalents of $4,769 and principal escrow deposits reflected in restricted cash of
$590. Our indebtedness has an average of 4.25 years to maturity at September
30, 2002. The aggregate maturities of notes payable at September 30, 2002 are as
follows:
Regularly Scheduled Principal Amortization Payments |
Balloon Principal Payment due at Maturity |
Total |
2002 |
$ 1,220 |
$
- - |
$ 1,220 |
Development and Lease-up Communities at September 30, 2002: | ||||||||||
Percent at September 30, 2002 |
Actual or Estimated Quarter of |
|||||||||
Community |
No. of |
Total |
Cost to Complete |
Complete |
Leased | Occupied |
Constr- |
Initial |
Constr- |
Stab- |
(millions) |
(millions) |
(a) |
Wholly-Owned Development and Lease-up Communities: | ||||||||||
Atlanta, GA | ||||||||||
Gables Rock
Springs Ph. 2 (b) |
233 |
$25 |
$21 |
16% |
- |
- |
2 Q 2001 |
3 Q 2003 |
3 Q 2004 |
4 Q 2004 |
Dallas, TX | ||||||||||
Gables Ellis Street | 245 | 46 | 9 | 75% | 22% |
17% |
3 Q 2001 | 3 Q 2002 | 3 Q 2003 | 3 Q 2004 |
Gables State
Thomas Ravello |
290 | 46 | 10 | 75% | - |
- |
4 Q 2001 | 1 Q 2003 | 3 Q 2003 | 3 Q 2004 |
Houston, TX | ||||||||||
Gables Augusta | 312 | 33 | 26 |
- |
- |
- |
4 Q 2002 | 1 Q 2004 | 4 Q 2004 | 2 Q 2005 |
Tampa, FL | ||||||||||
Gables Beach Park | 166 | 22 |
17 |
- |
- |
- |
4 Q 2002 |
4 Q 2003 |
2 Q 2004 | 3 Q 2004 |
Wholly-Owned Totals | 1,246 | $172 | $ 83 | |||||||
|
||||||||||
Atlanta, GA | ||||||||||
Gables Metropolitan II |
274 |
$ 32 |
$ 2 |
98% |
50% |
42% |
1 Q 2001 |
2 Q 2002 | 4 Q 2002 | 3 Q 2003 |
Tampa, FL | ||||||||||
Gables West Park Village II | 297 | 27 | 19 | 17% | - | - |
2 Q 2002 |
2 Q 2003 | 4 Q 2003 | 2 Q 2004 |
Co-Investment Totals | 571 | $ 59 | $21 |
(d) |
||||||
Wholly-Owned Completed Communities in Lease-Up: |
||||||||||
Atlanta, GA | ||||||||||
Gables Montclair | 183 | $ 23 | 100% | 87% |
86% |
3 Q 2000 | 4 Q 2001 | 3 Q 2002 | 4 Q 2002 | |
Gables Paces | 80 | 23 |
100% |
68% |
60% |
3 Q 2000 | 1 Q 2002 | 2 Q 2002 | 2 Q 2003 | |
Gables Rock
Springs Ph. 1 (b) |
22 | 4 | 100% | 95% | 68% | 4 Q 2001 | 2 Q 2002 | 3 Q 2002 | 4 Q 2002 | |
Houston, TX | ||||||||||
Gables Meyer Park II | 296 | 27 | 100% | 87% | 77% | 4 Q 2000 | 3 Q 2001 | 3 Q 2002 | 4 Q 2002 | |
Orlando, FL | ||||||||||
Gables North Village | 315 | 44 |
100% |
82% |
80% |
4 Q 1999 |
4 Q 2000 |
2 Q 2002 | 1 Q 2003 | |
Wholly-Owned Totals | 896 | $ 121 | ||||||||
Co-Investment Completed Communities in Lease-up (c): |
||||||||||
Tampa, FL | ||||||||||
Gables
West Park Village I (e) |
320 |
$35 |
100% | 86% | 78% |
4 Q 2000 |
3 Q 2001 | 2 Q 2002 | 1 Q 2003 | |
Co-Investment Totals |
320 |
$35 |
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
(a) Stabilized occupancy is defined as the earlier to occur of
(i) 93% physical occupancy or (ii) one year after completion of
Community September
30, 2002 MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS Community September
30, 2002 September 30, 2002
Scheduled Rent Per Austin, TX Grand Totals/Averages $992
construction.
(b) This community represents the reconstruction of 124 apartment homes
previously owned and operated by us into 255
apartment homes. The redevelopment is being completed in two
phases as reflected separately above. The remaining
166 apartment homes in
this community are still being operated by us.
(c) These communities are owned by the GRAP JV Two in which we have a 20%
interest.
(d) Construction loan proceeds are expected to fund $15 million of the costs
to complete at September 30, 2002. The remaining
costs will be funded
by capital contributions to the venture from our
venture partner and us in a funding ratio of 80% and
20%, respectively.
(e) This development community includes 40,000 square feet of commercial space which was
100% leased at September 30, 2002.
The following is a "Safe Harbor" Statement under the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The projections and estimates contained in the
table above are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements
involve risks and uncertainties and actual results may differ materially from
those projected and estimated in such statements. Risks associated with our development,
construction, and lease-up activities, which could impact the forward-looking
statements made, include: development opportunities may be abandoned;
construction costs of a community may exceed original estimates, possibly making
the community uneconomical; and construction and lease-up may not be completed
on schedule, resulting in increased debt service and construction costs.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
Stabilized Apartment Communities at September 30, 2002
No.
of
Apt.
Homes
OccupancySeptember
30, 2002
Scheduled Rent Per
Home Square Foot
Houston,
TX
Gables Austin Colony
Gables Bradford Place
Gables Bradford Pointe
Gables Champions
Gables Cityscape
Gables Citywalk/
Waterford Sq.
Gables Edgewater
Gables Lions Head
Gables Metropolitan Uptown
Gables Meyer Park I
Gables of First Colony
Gables Piney Point
Gables Pin Oak Green
Gables Pin Oak Park
Gables Rivercrest I
Gables Rivercrest II
Gables White Oak (JV)
Gables Windmill
Landing
Totals/Averages
Atlanta, GA
Briarcliff Gables
Buckhead Gables
Gables Cityscape
Gables Metropolitan I (JV)
Gables Mill
Gables Northcliff
Gables Vinings
Gables Walk
Gables Wood Arbor
Gables Wood Crossing
Gables Wood Glen
Gables Wood Knoll
Lakes at Indian Creek
Rock Springs Estates
Roswell Gables I
Roswell Gables II
Spalding Gables
Wildwood Gables
Totals/Averages
Boca Raton, FL
Cotton Bay
Gables Boca Place
Gables Boynton Beach I
Gables Boynton Beach II
Gables Kings Colony
Gables Mizner on the Green
Gables Palma Vista
Gables San Michele I
Gables San Michele II
Gables San Remo
Gables Town Colony
Gables Town Place
Gables Wellington
Hampton Lakes
Hampton Place
Mahogany Bay
Vinings at Hampton Village
Totals/ Averages
237
372
360
404
252
317
292
277
318
345
324
246
581
474
140
140
186
259
5,524
104
162
182
435
438
82
315
310
140
268
380
312
603
166
384
284
252
546
5,363
444
180
252
296
480
246
189
249
343
180
172
312
222
300
368
328
168
4,729
97%
92%
92%
95%
98%
97%
97%
96%
91%
92%
98%
97%
93%
94%
97%
93%
95%
94%
94%
91%
98%
95%
91%
96%
95%
95%
95%
85%
87%
84%
90%
89%
95%
95%
95%
97%
91%
92%
95%
90%
97%
96%
99%
89%
98%
94%
91%
98%
89%
97%
97%
94%
96%
97%
96%
95%
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)
$ 967
797
709
888
1,018
999
905
801
1,114
969
973
916
1,140
1,138
796
779
963
732
$ 945
$1,196
883
946
1,215
906
1,285
1,089
1,188
796
777
741
773
684
1,009
960
960
982
1,038
$ 943
$763
1,058
986
981
897
1,728
1,636
1,550
1,524
1,320
981
896
1,049
831
795
827
877
$1,062
$0.99
0.93
0.92
0.98
1.19
1.24
1.03
0.95
1.22
1.13
0.98
0.99
1.12
1.11
0.94
0.92
1.10
0.84
$1.05
$0.96
1.17
1.14
1.08
0.98
0.82
1.02
1.00
0.87
0.81
0.75
0.78
0.75
1.00
0.88
0.82
0.99
0.91
$0.91
$0.78
1.08
0.82
0.81
1.01
1.37
1.13
1.16
1.10
0.72
1.14
1.07
0.78
0.79
0.83
0.82
0.73
$0.94
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
Stabilized Apartment Communities as of September 30, 2002
No.
of
Apt.
Homes
Occupancy
Home
Square Foot
Gables at the Terrace
Gables Barton Creek
Gables Bluffstone
Gables Central Park
Gables Great Hills
Gables Park Mesa
Gables Town Lake
Totals/Averages
Dallas, TX
Gables at Pearl Street
Gables CityPlace
Gables Green Oaks
Gables Mirabella
Gables Spring Park
Gables State Thomas Townhomes
Gables Turtle Creek
Gables Valley Ranch
Totals/Averages
Memphis, TN
Arbors of Harbortown (JV)
Gables Cordova
Gables Stonebridge (JV)
Totals/Averages
Nashville, TN
Brentwood Gables (JV)
Gables Hendersonville (JV)
Gables Hickory Hollow I
Gables Hickory Hollow II
Totals/Averages
Orlando, FL
Gables Celebration
Gables Chatham Square (b)
The Commons at Little Lake Bryan (b)
Totals/Averages
Washington D.C.
Gables Dupont Circle
Totals/Averages
308
160
256
273
276
148
256
1,677
108
232
300
126
188
177
150
319
1,600
345
464
500
1,309
254
364
276
272
1,166
231
448
280
959
82
82
97%
94%
96%
96%
95%
97%
96%
96%
98%
98%
93%
97%
93%
87%
96%
95%
94%
94%
97%
94%
95%
95%
96%
92%
88%
93%
91%
100%
100%
98%
94%
94%
$1,134
1,464
1,080
1,361
870
1,230
1,360
$1,193
$1,344
1,381
863
1,196
982
1,969
1,197
956
$1,183
$879
689
694
$741
$911
688
655
649
$719
$1,194
--
--
$1,194
$2,665
$2,665
$1.19
1.26
1.10
1.44
1.05
1.13
1.46
$1.24
$1.23
1.31
0.90
1.31
0.93
1.32
1.19
0.94
$1.11
$0.89
0.74
0.79
$0.80
$0.80
0.73
0.73
0.68
$0.74
$1.03
--
--
$1.03
$2.74
$2.74
22,409
94%
$0.98
(a)
(b)
This property is in
renovation; therefore, occupancy is based on apartment homes available for
lease.
This property is
leased to a single user group pursuant to a triple net master lease.
Accordingly, scheduled rent data is not reflected
as it is not comparable to the rest of our portfolio.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
Portfolio Indebtedness Summary at September 30, 2002 | ||||
Type of Indebtedness |
Balance |
Interest Rate (a) |
Total Rate (b) |
Years to Maturity |
Fixed Rate: Unsecured fixed-rate notes Secured fixed-rate notes Unsecured tax-exempt fixed-rate loans Secured tax-exempt fixed-rate loans |
||||
$ 501,360 |
6.59% |
6.59% |
4.18 |
|
Total fixed-rate indebtedness |
$ 708,129 |
6.66% |
6.68% |
4.52 |
Variable Rate: |
|
|
|
|
Total portfolio debt (d), (e) |
$956,280 |
5.43% |
5.63% |
4.25 |
(a) Interest Rate represents the weighted average interest rate incurred on our indebtedness, exclusive of deferred financing cost amortization and credit enhancement fees, as applicable.
(b) Total Rate represents the Interest Rate (a) plus credit enhancement fees, as applicable.
(c) Our credit facilities bear interest at various spreads over
LIBOR. For purposes of the years to maturity disclosure, all such indebtedness is presented using
the May 2005 maturity date of our $225,000 unsecured credit facility. We
have an option to extend the maturity date of this facility to May 2006
which is exercisable in May 2003.
(d) Interest associated with construction activities is capitalized as a cost of development and does not impact current earnings. The qualifying construction expenditures at September 30, 2002 for purposes of interest capitalization were $127,044.
(e) Excludes (i) $16,350 of tax-exempt bonds related to a joint venture in which we own a 25% interest, (ii) $68,357 million of indebtedness related to joint ventures in which we own a 20% interest, and (iii) $52,100 of conventional indebtedness related to a joint venture in which we own an 8.3% interest.
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCUSSION - Funds From Operations and Adjusted Funds From Operations
We consider funds from operations ("FFO") to be a useful performance measure of the operating performance of an equity REIT because, together with net income and cash flows, FFO provides investors with an additional basis to evaluate the ability of a REIT to incur and service debt and to fund distributions and capital expenditures. We believe that in order to facilitate a clear understanding of our operating results, FFO should be examined in conjunction with net income as presented in the financial statements and data included elsewhere in this
report. FFO is determined in accordance with the principles established
by the Board of Governors of the National
Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts
("NAREIT"). FFO, as defined by NAREIT, represents net income (loss) determined in accordance with GAAP, excluding extraordinary items as defined under GAAP and gains or losses from sales of
previously depreciated operating real estate assets, plus certain non-cash items
such as real estate asset depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. FFO presented herein is not necessarily comparable to FFO presented by other real estate companies due to the fact that not all real estate companies use the same definition. However, our FFO is comparable to the FFO of real estate companies that use the
NAREIT definition. Adjusted funds from operations ("AFFO") is defined as FFO less
recurring value retention capital expenditures. FFO and AFFO should not be considered alternatives to net income as indicators of our operating performance or as alternatives to cash flows as measures of liquidity. FFO does not measure whether cash flow is sufficient to fund all of our cash needs, including principal amortization, capital expenditures, and distributions to unitholders. Additionally, FFO does not represent cash flows from operating, investing or financing activities as defined by GAAP. Reference is made to "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources"
in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for a discussion of our cash needs and cash flows. A reconciliation of FFO and AFFO follows:
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
Three
Months |
Nine Months |
|||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2002 | 2001 | |||||
Net income available to common
unitholders |
$8,478 |
|
$4,755 |
$ 46,542 |
$ 34,960 |
|||
Extraordinary loss Real estate depreciation and amortization: Wholly-owned real estate assets - continuing operations Wholly-owned real estate assets - discontinued operations Joint venture real estate assets - continuing operations Joint venture real estate assets - discontinued operations Total |
- 10,736 - - 347 - 11,083 |
- - 11,780 141 273 52 12,246 |
1,687 34,931 48 1,040 51 36,070 |
- - 33,996 420 1,136 155 35,707 |
||||
Gain on sale of previously depreciated operating real estate assets: Wholly-owned real estate assets - continuing operations Wholly-owned real estate assets - discontinued operations Joint venture real estate assets - continuing operations Joint venture real estate assets - discontinued operations Total |
- - - ( 857 - ( 857 |
|
- - - - - - - - |
(17,906 ( 2,198 ( 1,864 ( 747 (22,715 |
|
( 7,386 - - - - ( 7,386 |
|
|
Funds from operations - basic and diluted |
$18,704 |
$17,001 |
$ 61,584 |
$63,281 |
||||
Recurring value retention capital expenditures: Carpet and flooring Appliances Other additions and improvements Total capital expenditures |
$ 1,998 233 1,255 $ 3,486 |
$2,083 171 1,211 $3,465 |
$4,840 584 4,426 $9,850 |
$4,652 503 4,023 $9,178 |
||||
Adjusted funds from operations - diluted |
$ 15,218 |
$ 13,536 |
$ 51,734 |
$ 54,103 |
||||
|
30,718 |
30,286 |
30,662 |
30,067 |
||||
Average Units outstanding - diluted |
30,812 |
30,479 |
30,805 |
30,236 |
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our capital structure includes the use of variable rate and fixed rate indebtedness. As such, we are exposed to the impact of changes in interest rates. We periodically seek input from third-party consultants regarding market interest rate and credit risk in order to evaluate our interest rate exposure. In certain situations, we may utilize derivative financial instruments in the form of rate caps, rate swaps or rate locks to hedge interest rate exposure by modifying the interest rate characteristics of related balance sheet instruments and prospective financing transactions. We do not utilize such instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
We typically refinance maturing debt instruments at then-existing market interest rates and at terms which may be more or less than the interest rates and terms on the maturing debt.
Refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2001 for detailed disclosure about quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk. Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk have not materially changed since
December 31, 2001.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
As required by new Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), within the 90 days prior to the date of this report, we carried
out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of senior management, including
our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation,
our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's
rules and forms. In connection with the new rules, we currently are in the
process of further reviewing and documenting our disclosure controls and
procedures, including our internal controls and procedures for financial
reporting, and may from time to time make changes aimed at enhancing their
effectiveness and to ensure that our systems evolve with our business.
(b) Changes in internal controls.
None
Item 1: |
Legal Proceedings |
||
|
|
None |
|
Item 2: |
Changes in Securities |
||
|
|
Each time the Trust issues shares of beneficial interest , it contributes the proceeds of such issuance to us in return for a like number of Units with rights and preferences analogous to the shares issued. During the period commencing July 1, 2002 and ending September 30, 2002, in connection with issuances of common shares by the Trust during that time period, the Operating Partnership issued an aggregate 12,607 Units to the Trust. Such Units were issued in reliance on an exemption from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. |
|
Item 3: |
Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
||
|
|
None |
|
Item 4: |
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
||
|
|
None |
|
Item 5: |
Other Information |
||
|
|
None |
|
Item 6: |
Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K |
||
|
(a) |
Exhibits |
|
3.1 * Fifth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of
Operating Partnership 3.2 * Articles Supplementary to the Trust's Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust creating the 7.875% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares 4.1 Supplemental Indenture No. 5 dated July 8, 2002, between the Operating Partnership and Wachovia Bank, National Association (1) 4.2 The Operating Partnership 5.75% Senior Notes due 2007 (1) 4.3 * Supplemental Indenture No. 6 dated September 27, 2002, between the Operating Partnership and Wachovia Bank, National Association 4.4 * The Operating Partnership 5.86% Senior Notes due 2009 4.5 * Supplemental Indenture No. 7 dated September 27, 2002 between the Operating Partnership and Wachovia Bank, National Association 4.6 * The Operating Partnership 6.10% Senior Notes due 2010 4.7 * Registration Rights Agreement dated September 27, 2002 between the Trust and Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America 4.8 * Registration Rights Agreement dated September 27, 2002 between the Operating Partnership and Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America 10.1 * Securities Purchase Agreement dated September 27, 2002 between the Trust, Gables GP, Inc., the Operating Partnership and Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America * Filed herewith |
|||
(1) Incorporated herein by reference to the Operating Partnership's
Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 8, 2002 (File No. 000-22683). |
|||
(b) |
Reports on Form 8-K |
||
(i) A Form 8-K was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on July 9, 2002 with the underwriting agreement, indenture and other related items executed in connection with the Operating Partnership's issuance of $180 million of 5.75% Senior Unsecured Notes due July 2007. |
|||
(ii) A Form 8-K was filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2002 to disclose the certifications by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer made to the Securities and Exchange Commission. - -------- |
|||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
GABLES REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP |
Date: |
November 14, 2002 |
|
/s/ Marvin R. Banks, Jr. |
|
|
|
Marvin R. Banks, Jr. |
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(a)
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Chris D. Wheeler, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Gables Realty Limited
Partnership;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
quarterly report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a
date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the
"Evaluation Date"); and
c) Presented in this
quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) All significant
deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) Any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: November 14, 2002
/s/ Chris D. Wheeler
Chris D. Wheeler
President and Chief Executive Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(a)
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Marvin R. Banks, Jr., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Gables
Realty Limited Partnership;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
quarterly report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a
date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the
"Evaluation Date"); and
c) Presented in this
quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) All significant
deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) Any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: November 14, 2002
/s/ Marvin R. Banks, Jr.
Marvin R. Banks, Jr.
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer