SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10 - Q
(X) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002
( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number: 000-22683
GABLES REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)
DELAWARE |
|
58-2077966 |
|
6551 Park of Commerce Blvd., Suite 100
Boca Raton, Florida 33487
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(561) 997-9700
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past (90) days.
(1) |
(X) YES |
( ) NO |
(2) |
(X) YES |
( ) NO |
GABLES REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
FORM 10 - Q INDEX
Part I |
Financial Information |
Page |
Item 1: |
Financial Statements |
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001 |
3 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 | 4 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 | 5 |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | 6 |
Item 2: |
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 12 |
Item 3: |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 30 |
|
||
Part II |
||
Item 1: |
Legal Proceedings |
31 |
Item 2: | Changes in Securities | 31 |
Item 3: | Defaults Upon Senior Securities | 31 |
Item 4: | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | 31 |
Item 5: | Other Information | 31 |
Item 6: | Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K | 31 |
|
Signature |
32 |
PART I. - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
GABLES REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP |
||||||
June
30, 2002 (Unaudited) |
December 31, 2001 |
|||||
ASSETS: Cash and cash equivalents |
$ $ $ |
|
|
$ $ |
|
|
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL: |
$ $ |
|
$ $ |
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated balance sheets. |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited and Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
Unless the context otherwise requires, all references to
"we," "our" or "us" in this report refer
collectively to Gables Realty Limited Partnership and its subsidiaries.
1.
ORGANIZATION AND FORMATION
Gables Realty Limited Partnership
(the "Operating Partnership") is the entity through which Gables
Residential Trust (the "Trust"), a real estate investment trust (a
"REIT"), conducts substantially all of its business and owns, either
directly or indirectly through subsidiaries, substantially all of its assets.
The Trust was formed in 1993 under Maryland law to continue and expand the
operations of its privately owned predecessor organization. The Trust completed
its initial public offering on January 26, 1994.
We are a fully integrated real estate
company engaged in the multifamily apartment community management, development,
construction, acquisition and disposition businesses. We also provide related
brokerage and corporate rental housing services. Substantially all of our
third-party management businesses are conducted through a wholly-owned
subsidiary, Gables Residential Services.
As of June 30, 2002, the Trust was an 80.7%
economic owner of our common equity. The Trust controls us through Gables GP,
Inc. ("Gables GP"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Trust and our
sole general partner. This structure is commonly referred to as an umbrella
partnership REIT or "UPREIT." The board of directors of Gables GP, the
members of which are the same as the members of the Trust's board of trustees,
manages our affairs by directing the affairs of Gables GP. The Trust's limited
partnership and indirect general partnership interests in us entitle it to share
in our cash distributions, and in our profits and losses in proportion to its
ownership interest therein and entitles the Trust to vote on all matters
requiring a vote of the limited partners. Generally, our other limited partners
are persons who contributed their direct or indirect interests in certain real
estate assets to us primarily in connection with the IPO and the 1998
acquisition of the real estate assets and operations of Trammell Crow
Residential South Florida ("South Florida"). We are obligated to
redeem each common unit of limited partnership interest ("Unit") held
by a person other than the Trust at the request of the holder for an amount
equal to the fair market value of a share of the Trust's common shares at the
time of such redemption, provided that we, at our option, may elect to
acquire each Unit presented for redemption for one common share or cash. Such
limited partners' redemption rights are reflected in "limited partners'
capital interest" in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at the
cash redemption amount at the balance sheet date. The Trust's percentage
ownership interest in us will increase with each redemption. In addition,
whenever the Trust issues common shares or preferred shares, it is obligated to
contribute any net proceeds to us and we are obligated to issue an equivalent
number of common or preferred Units, as applicable, to the Trust.
Distributions to holders of Units are made
to enable distributions to be made to the Trust's shareholders under its
dividend policy. The Trust must currently distribute 90% of its ordinary taxable
income to its shareholders. We make distributions to the Trust to enable it to
satisfy this requirement.
As of June 30, 2002, we managed a total of 159 multifamily apartment communities comprising 44,969 apartment homes for assets owned by us and our
third-party clients. At June 30, 2002, we owned 73 stabilized multifamily apartment communities comprising
20,325 apartment homes, an indirect 25% interest in one stabilized apartment
community comprising 345 apartment homes, an indirect 20% interest in three stabilized apartment communities comprising 947 apartment homes, and an indirect 8.3% interest in
three stabilized apartment communities comprising 1,118 apartment homes. We also owned
eight multifamily apartment communities under development or in lease-up at June 30, 2002 that are expected to comprise
1,830 apartment homes upon completion and an indirect 20% interest in four apartment communities under development or in lease-up at
June 30,
2002 that are expected to comprise 1,077 apartment homes upon completion. In addition, as of June 30, 2002, we owned parcels of land on which we intend to develop two apartment communities that we currently expect will comprise an estimated
761 apartment homes. We also have rights to acquire additional parcels of land on which we believe we could develop communities. Any future development is subject to permits and other governmental approvals, as well as our ongoing business review, and may not be undertaken or completed.
2. COMMON AND PREFERRED EQUITY ACTIVITY
Secondary Common Share Offerings
Since the IPO, the Trust has issued a total of 14,831 common shares in eight offerings, generating $347,771 in net proceeds which were generally used (1) to reduce outstanding indebtedness under interim financing vehicles utilized to fund development and acquisition activities and (2) for general working capital purposes, including funding of future development and acquisition activities.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited and Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
Preferred Share Offerings
On July 24, 1997, the Trust issued 4,600 shares of 8.30% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares (liquidation preference $25.00 per share). The net proceeds from this offering of $111.0 million were used to reduce outstanding indebtedness under interim financing vehicles. On August 9, 2002, the Trust redeemed the Series A Preferred Shares at $25.00 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends.
On June 18, 1998, the Trust issued 180 shares of 5.0% Series Z Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares (liquidation preference $25.00 per share) in connection with the acquisition of a parcel of land for future development. The Series Z Preferred Shares, which are subject to mandatory redemption on June 18, 2018, may be redeemed at the Trust's option at any time for $25.00 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends. The Series Z Preferred Shares are not subject to any sinking fund or convertible into any other securities of the Trust.
Issuances of Common Operating Partnership Units
Since the IPO, we have issued a total of 4,421 Units in connection with the South Florida acquisition, the acquisition of other operating apartment communities and the acquisition of a parcel of land for future development.
Issuance of Preferred Operating Partnership Units
On November 12, 1998, we issued 2,000 of our 8.625% Series B Preferred Units to an institutional investor. The net proceeds from this issuance of $48.7 million were used to reduce outstanding indebtedness under interim financing vehicles. The Trust has the option to redeem the Series B Preferred Units after November 14, 2003. These Units are exchangeable by the holder into 8.625% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of the Trust on a one-for-one basis; however, this exchange right is generally not exercisable until after November 14, 2008. The Series B Preferred Units have no stated maturity, sinking fund or mandatory redemption.
Common Equity Repurchase Program
We have a common equity repurchase program pursuant to which the Trust is authorized to purchase up to $150 million of its outstanding common shares or Units. The Trust has repurchased shares from time to time in open market and privately negotiated transactions, depending on market prices and other conditions, using proceeds from sales of selected assets. Whenever the Trust repurchases common shares from shareholders, we are required to redeem from the Trust an equivalent number of Units on the same terms and for the same aggregate price. After redemption, the Units redeemed by us are no longer deemed outstanding. Units have also been repurchased for cash upon their presentation for redemption by unitholders. As of June 30, 2002, we had redeemed 4,275 Units, for a total of $102,279, including 3,980 Units redeemed by the Trust.
Shelf Registration Statement
We have an effective shelf registration statement on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission that currently provides $500 million of equity capacity. The debt portion of this shelf registration statement has been fully utilized after our February 2001 and July 2002 senior unsecured note offerings.
3. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
consolidated accounts of the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries, including
Gables Residential
Services. We consolidate the financial statements of all entities in which we have a controlling financial interest, as that term is defined under generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), through either majority voting interest or contractual agreements.
Our investments in non-majority owned and/or non-controlled joint ventures are
accounted for using the equity method. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited and Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
The accompanying interim unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP for interim financial information and in conjunction with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In our opinion, all adjustments (consisting only of normally recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation for these interim periods have been included. The results of operations for the interim
period ended June 30, 2002 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements included in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2001.
4. PORTFOLIO AND OTHER FINANCING ACTIVITY
Community and Land Dispositions
In January 2002, we sold two apartment communities in Houston comprising 502
apartment homes and a 13.3 acre parcel of land adjacent to one of the
communities. The net proceeds from these sales totaled $37 million and
were used to paydown outstanding borrowings under our credit facilities. In March 2002, we sold an apartment community in Atlanta comprising 311
apartment homes. The net proceeds from this sale totaled $25 million
and were used to paydown outstanding borrowings under our credit facilities.
The gain from the land sale was $0.8 million and the aggregate gain from the
sale of the previously depreciated operating real estate assets was $20.1
million, all of which was recognized in the first quarter of 2002. In addition,
during the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, we recognized $0.0 million and $0.3 million, respectively, of deferred gain associated with a parcel of land we sold in 2000. During the six
months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, we recognized $0.1 million and $0.5 million, respectively, of deferred gain associated with this land sale.
In March 2002, the Gables Residential Apartment Portfolio JV (the "GRAP
JV") sold two stabilized apartment communities located in Houston and South
Florida, comprising 702 apartment homes, for $59 million. Our share of
the net sales proceeds after repayment of construction loan indebtedness of $25
million was $6 million, resulting in a gain of $1.7 million, which was
recognized in the first quarter of 2002.
During 2001, we contributed our interest in certain land and development rights
to the Gables Residential Apartment Portfolio JV Two (the "GRAP JV
Two") in return for (1) cash of $18.5 million and (2) capital account
credit of $4.6 million. The $2.8 million of gain we will
record associated with this contribution is being recognized when earned using
the percentage of completion method since we serve as the developer and general
contractor for the joint venture. As of June 30, 2002, we had recognized $2.5 million of this gain. We recognized
$0.5 million and $0.3 million of this gain
during the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively, and $0.9 million and $0.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001,
respectively.
During 2001, we sold an apartment community located in Atlanta comprising
386 apartment homes, an apartment community located in Houston comprising 776
apartment homes, an apartment community located in Dallas comprising 536
apartment homes and a 2.5 acre parcel of land adjacent to one of our development
communities located in Atlanta. The net proceeds from these sales totaled
$93.6 million, $9 million of which was deposited into an escrow account and used
to fund acquisition activities. The balance of the net proceeds was used
to repay a $16 million note assumed in connection with our September 2001
acquisition of the Gables State Thomas Ravello community and to paydown
outstanding borrowings under interim financing vehicles. The gain from the land
sale was $0.9 million and the aggregate gain from the sale of the previously
depreciated operating real estate assets was $34.1 million, all of which was recognized in 2001.
In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2001, we recognized $0.7 million of deferred gain
associated with a
parcel of land we sold in 2000.
Community Acquisitions
On September 28, 2001, we acquired the 80% membership interest of our
venture partner in the GRAP JV in the Gables State Thomas Ravello apartment
community located in Dallas comprising 290 apartment homes. In consideration for such community, we paid $12 million in cash and assumed a $16
million secured variable-rate note. This consideration was based on a
valuation of the asset of $31 million and is net of our $3 million share of the
venture distribution. We recorded a $5 million charge to unusual items in
the third quarter of 2001 associated with the write-off of building
components that will be replaced in connection with a remediation program to
address water infiltration issues plaguing the asset.
On August 28, 2001, we acquired an apartment community located in
Washington, D.C. comprising 82 apartment homes for approximately $25 million.
On August 1, 2001, we acquired the 75% interest of our venture partner in
the Gables Metropolitan Uptown apartment community located in Houston comprising
318 apartment homes. The asset was valued at approximately $27 million.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited and Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
On March 30, 2001, we acquired the 80% membership interests of our venture
partner in the GRAP JV in the Gables Palma Vista and Gables San Michelle II
apartment communities located in South Florida comprising 532 apartment homes
for $66 million. This cash consideration was based on a valuation of the assets
of $75 million and is net of our $9 million share of the venture distribution.
Other Acquisition
In May 2001, we acquired a property management company based in
Washington,
D.C. that managed approximately 3,600 units in 24 multifamily apartment
communities located in Washington, D.C. and the surrounding area at the time of
the acquisition (the "D.C.
Management Co."). The total investment is approximately $1.6 million
and is structured to be paid in three installments based on results of the
acquired business operations.
Senior Unsecured Note Issuance
In February 2001, we issued $150 million of senior unsecured notes which
bear interest at an annual rate of 7.25%, were priced to yield 7.29% and mature in February 2006.
The net proceeds of $148.5 million were used to reduce borrowings under our
unsecured credit facilities and repay our $40 million term loan, which had a
November 2001 maturity date.
In July 2002, we issued $180 million
of senior unsecured notes which bear interest at an annual rate of 5.75%,
were priced to yield 5.81% and mature in July 2007.
The net proceeds of
$178 million were used to redeem all outstanding shares of the 8.3% Series A
Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares totaling $115 million on August 9, 2002 and to reduce borrowings under our
unsecured credit facilities.
Debt Refinancing
In May 2002, we called $48.4 million of
secured tax-exempt bond indebtedness with an interest rate of 6.375% and
re-issued the bonds on an unsecured basis at a rate of 4.75%. In
connection with the early extinguishment of debt, we incurred a prepayment
penalty of $1,451 and wrote-off unamortized deferred financing costs totaling
$236. Such charges totaling $1,687 are reflected as an extraordinary loss
in the statements of operations. The previous bonds required monthly
principal amortization payments that were retained in an escrow account and were not applied to reduce
the outstanding principal balance of the loan. Such principal payments
held in escrow totaling $4,121 were released in May 2002. This refinancing
transaction
allowed us to improve our debt constant by 2.75%, unencumber six communities
comprising 2,028 apartment homes and achieve a positive net present value
result.
5. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June 1998, SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities," was issued, establishing accounting
and reporting standards requiring that every derivative instrument, including
certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, be recorded in the
balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value. SFAS
No. 133 requires that changes in the derivative's fair value be recognized
currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. Special
accounting for qualifying hedges allows a derivative's gains and losses to
offset related results on the hedged item in the statements of operations, and
requires that a company must formally document, designate, and assess the
effectiveness of transactions that receive hedge accounting. SFAS No. 133,
as amended by SFAS No. 137, was effective for us beginning January 1,
2001. The impact of SFAS No. 133 on our financial statements will depend on the
extent, type and effectiveness of our hedging activities. SFAS No. 133
could increase volatility in net income and other comprehensive income. We had
no derivative instruments in place from January 1, 2001 to June 30, 2002.
In June 2001, SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations," (effective
for us July 1, 2001) and SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets," (effective for us January 1, 2002) were issued. SFAS No. 141
prohibits pooling-of-interests accounting for acquisitions. SFAS No. 142
specifies that goodwill and some intangible assets will no longer be amortized
but instead will be subject to periodic impairment testing. We have
not accounted for any of our business combinations since our IPO using the
pooling method of accounting and did not have goodwill or other intangible assets
at December 31, 2001 or June 30, 2002. As a result, the adoption of SFAS No. 141 and SFAS No. 142 did not have a significant impact on our financial statements.
In August 2001, SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations," (effective for us January 1, 2003) was issued.
SFAS No. 143 requires that entities recognize the fair value of a liability for
an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred if a
reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. We believe that the
adoption of SFAS No. 143 will not have a significant impact on our financial
statements.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited and Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
In August 2001, SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets," (effective for us January 1, 2002) was issued.
SFAS No. 144 addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment of
long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of. The
statement supersedes SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of," and among
other factors, establishes criteria beyond that previously specified in SFAS No.
121 to determine when a long-lived asset is to be considered as held for sale.
The implementation of SFAS No. 144 requires that the gains and losses from the
disposition of certain real estate assets and the related historical operating
results be included in discontinued
operations in the statements of operations for all periods presented. In
the normal course of business, we recycle invested capital by disposing of
existing assets and redeploying the proceeds in order to enhance total
returns to shareholders. Although net income is not affected, we
expect to reclassify results previously included in continuing operations to
discontinued operations for any qualifying dispositions in accordance with
SFAS No. 144. We believe that the impairment
provisions of SFAS No. 144 are similar to SFAS No. 121 and that the adoption
thereof will not have a significant impact on our financial statements.
In April 2002, SFAS No. 145, "Rescission of SFAS
Nos. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of SFAS No. 13, and Technical
Corrections," was issued. SFAS No. 145 (effective for us January
1, 2003), among other things, eliminates therequirement that all gains and losses from the extinguishment of debt be aggregated and, if
material, classified as an extraordinary item. However, a gain or loss
arising from such an event or transaction would continue to be classified as
an extraordinary item if the event or transaction is both unusual in nature
and infrequent in occurrence per the criteria in APB No. 30, "Reporting
the Results of Operations - Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment
of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events
and Transactions." As part of the transition guidance, although net income would not be
affected, gains and
losses from debt extinguishment in prior periods that do not meet the
criteria in APB No. 30 must be reclassified to continuing operations for all
periods presented.
6.
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
We adopted SFAS No. 144 effective
January 1, 2002 which requires, among other things, that the operating results
of certain real estate assets sold subsequent to January 1, 2002 be included in
discontinued operations in the statements of operations for all periods
presented. Three of our wholly-owned operating real estate assets and two
operating real estate assets owned by the GRAP JV were sold during the first
quarter of 2002. There were no asset sales during the second quarter of
2002.
We retained management of two of the three
wholly-owned assets and one of the two GRAP JV assets sold. Due to our
continuing involvement with the operations of the three assets sold that we are
continuing to manage, the operating results of these assets are included in
continuing operations. The operating results for both the wholly-owned asset
comprising 256 apartment homes located in Houston and the GRAP JV asset
comprising 382 apartment homes located in Houston sold that we are not continuing to manage are included in
discontinued operations in the statements of operations for all periods
presented. Interest expense has been allocated to the
results of the discontinued operations in accordance with EITF No. 87-24.
Condensed financial information of the
results of operations for the real estate assets sold included in discontinued
operations is as follows:
Three
Months |
Six
Months |
|||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
|||||
Total property revenues Equity in income of joint ventures Total revenues |
$
- |
$ 663 |
$ 197 |
$ 1,304 |
||||
Property operating and maintenance expense Real estate asset depreciation and amortization Interest expense Total expenses |
- - - - |
252 139 87 478 |
91 48 34 173 |
496 279 159 934 |
||||
Income from discontinued operations | - |
|
217 |
|
69 |
|
430 | |
Gain on disposition of discontinued operations | - | - | 2,945 | - | ||||
Income from discontinued operations |
$ - |
$ 217 | $3,014 | $ 430 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited and Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
7. EARNINGS PER UNIT
Basic earnings per Unit are computed based on net income available to common
unitholders and the weighted average number of common Units outstanding. Diluted earnings per
Unit reflect the assumed issuance of common Units under the Trust's share option and incentive plan. The numerator and denominator used for both basic and diluted earnings per
Unit computations are as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||
Basic and diluted income available to common unitholders (numerator): | 2002 | 2001 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||
Income from continuing operations (net of preferred distributions) - basic and diluted |
|
7,706 |
$ |
18,664 |
|
36,737 |
$ |
29,775 |
||
Income from discontinued operations - basic and diluted | $ | - | $ | 217 | $ | 3,014 | $ | 430 | ||
Income before extraordinary item (net of preferred distributions) - basic and diluted |
$ |
7,706 |
$ |
|
$ |
39,751 |
$ |
30,205 |
||
Extraordinary loss - basic and diluted | $ | ( 1,687 |
) |
$ |
- - |
$ | (1,687 |
) |
$ |
- - |
Net income - basic and diluted |
$ |
6,019 |
$ |
18,881 |
$ | 38,064 | $ | 30,205 | ||
Common Units (denominator): |
|
|||||||||
Average Units outstanding - basic |
30,762 163 6 30,931 |
30,051 |
30,634 162 6 30,802 |
29,956 151 6 30,113 |
8. SEGMENT REPORTING
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating
decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. Our chief operating
decision maker is our senior management group.
We own, operate and develop multifamily apartment communities in major markets located in Texas, Georgia, Florida,
Washington, D.C. and Tennessee. Such apartment communities generate rental revenue and other income through the leasing of apartment homes to a diverse base of residents. We evaluate the performance of each of our apartment communities on an individual basis. However, because each of our apartment communities has similar economic characteristics, residents, and products and services, our apartment communities have been aggregated into one reportable segment. This
segment comprises 95% of our total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and
2001, and 95% and 96% of our total revenues for the six months ended June
30, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
The primary financial measure for our reportable business segment is net operating income ("NOI"), which represents total property revenues less property operating and maintenance expenses (as reflected in the accompanying statements of operations). Accordingly, NOI excludes certain expenses included in the determination of net income. Current year NOI is compared to prior year NOI and current year budgeted NOI as a measure of financial performance. The NOI yield or return on total capitalized costs is an additional measure of financial performance. NOI from our wholly-owned apartment communities included in continuing operations
totaled $35,871 and $39,283 for the three months ended June 30,
2002 and 2001, respectively, and $73,626 and $76,963 for the six months ended
June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. All other segment measurements are disclosed in
our consolidated financial statements.
We also provide management, brokerage, corporate rental housing and development and construction services to third parties. These operations, on an individual and aggregate basis, do not meet the quantitative thresholds for segment reporting under current accounting literature.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
We
are the entity through which Gables Residential Trust (the "Trust"), a
real estate investment trust (a "REIT"), conducts substantially all of
its business and owns, either directly or indirectly through subsidiaries,
substantially all of its assets. We are focused within the
multifamily industry in demand-driven markets throughout the United States that
have high job growth and are resilient to economic downturns. Our operating
performance relies predominantly on net operating income from our apartment
communities. Net operating income is determined by rental revenues and operating
expenses, which are affected by the demand and supply dynamics within our
markets. Our performance is also affected by the general availability and cost
of capital and our ability to develop and acquire additional apartment
communities with returns in excess of our blended cost of capital.
Business Objectives and Strategy
The Trust's objective is to increase shareholder value by producing consistent high quality earnings to sustain dividend growth and annual total returns that exceed the multifamily sector average. To achieve that objective, we employ a number of business strategies. First, our long-term investment strategy is research-driven, with the objective of creating a portfolio of high quality assets in approximately six to eight strategically selected markets that are complementary through economic diversity and characterized by high job growth and resiliency to national economic downturns. We believe such a portfolio will provide predictable growth in operating cash flow on a sustainable basis. Second, we adhere to a strategy of owning and operating high quality, class AA/A apartment communities under the Gables brand. We believe that such communities, when located in highly desirable areas to live and supplemented with high quality service and amenities, attract the affluent renter-by-choice who is willing to pay a premium for location preference, superior service and high quality communities. The resulting portfolio should maintain high levels of occupancy and rental rates. This, coupled with more predictable operating expenses and reduced capital expenditure requirements associated with high quality construction materials, should lead to operating margins that exceed national averages for the multifamily sector and sustainable growth in operating cash flow. Third, our aim is to be recognized as the employer of choice within the industry. Our mission of Taking Care of the Way People Live is a cornerstone of our strategy, involving innovative human resource practices that we believe will attract and retain the highest caliber associates. Because of our long-established presence as a fully in tegrated apartment management, development, construction, acquisition and disposition company within our markets, we have the ability to offer multi-faceted career opportunities among the various disciplines within the industry. Finally, our capital strategy is to maximize return on invested capital while maintaining financial flexibility through a conservative, investment grade credit profile. We judiciously manage our capital and are able to recycle existing capital through asset dispositions. We believe the successful execution of these strategies will result in operating cash flow and dividend growth, producing annual total returns that exceed the multifamily REIT sector average.
We believe we are well positioned to continue achieving our objectives because of our long-established presence as a fully integrated real estate company in our markets. This local market presence creates a competitive advantage in generating increased cash flow from (1) property operations during different economic cycles and (2) new investment opportunities that involve site selection, market information and requests for entitlements and zoning petitions.
Portfolio-wide occupancy levels have been reduced slightly and portfolio-wide rental rate growth has slowed as a result of national economic weakness. We expect portfolio-wide rental expenses for 2002 to increase at a rate ahead of inflation due in part to increasing insurance costs, along with higher turnover and marketing costs associated with the current national economic conditions. In addition, we expect property revenues on a same-store basis to be lower in 2002 than in 2001. Our ongoing evaluation of the growth prospects for a specific asset may result in a determination to dispose of the asset. In that event, we would intend to sell the asset and utilize the net proceeds from any such sale to invest in new assets expected to have better growth prospects, reduce indebtedness or, in certain circumstances with appropriate approval from the Trust's board of trustees, repurchase outstanding common shares. We maintain staffing levels sufficient to meet existing construction, acquisition and leasing activities. When market conditions warrant, we adjust staffing levels to mitigate a negative impact on results of operations.
Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Actual results or developments could differ materially from those projected in such statements as a result of certain factors set forth in the section entitled "Certain Factors Affecting Future Operating Results" and elsewhere in this report. The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
Common and Preferred Equity Activity
Secondary Common Share Offerings
Since the IPO, the Trust has issued a total of 14,831 common shares in eight offerings, generating $347,771 in net proceeds which were generally used (1) to reduce outstanding indebtedness under interim financing vehicles utilized to fund our development and acquisition activities and (2) for general working capital purposes, including funding of future development and acquisition activities.
Preferred Share Offerings
On July 24, 1997, the Trust issued 4,600 shares of 8.30% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares (liquidation preference $25.00 per share). The net proceeds from this offering of $111.0 million were used to reduce outstanding indebtedness under interim financing vehicles. On August 9, 2002, the Trust redeemed the Series A Preferred Shares at $25.00 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends.
On June 18, 1998, the Trust issued 180 shares of 5.0% Series Z Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares (liquidation preference $25.00 per share) in connection with the acquisition of a parcel of land for future development. The Series Z Preferred Shares, which are subject to mandatory redemption on June 18, 2018, may be redeemed at the Trust's option at any time for $25.00 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends. The Series Z Preferred Shares are not subject to any sinking fund or convertible into any other securities of the Trust.
Issuances of Common Operating Partnership Units
Since the IPO, we have issued a total of 4,421 Units in connection with the 1998 acquisition of the real estate assets and operations of South Florida, the acquisition of other operating apartment communities and the acquisition of a parcel of land for future development.
Issuance of Preferred Operating Partnership Units
On November 12, 1998, we issued 2,000 of our 8.625% Series B Preferred Units to an institutional investor. The net proceeds from this issuance of $48.7 million were used to reduce outstanding indebtedness under interim financing vehicles. The Trust has the option to redeem the Series B Preferred Units after November 14, 2003. These Units are exchangeable by the holder into 8.625% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of the Trust on a one-for-one basis; however, this exchange right is generally not exercisable until after November 14, 2008. The Series B Preferred Units have no stated maturity, sinking fund or mandatory redemption.
Common Equity Repurchase Program
We have a common equity
repurchase program pursuant to which the Trust is authorized to purchase up to
$150 million of its outstanding common shares or Units. The Trust has
repurchased shares from time to time in open market and privately negotiated
transactions, depending on market prices and other conditions, using proceeds
from sales of selected assets. Whenever the Trust repurchases common
shares from shareholders, we are required to redeem from the Trust an equivalent
number of Units on the same terms and for the same aggregate price. After
redemption, the Units redeemed by us are no longer deemed outstanding.
Units have also been repurchased for cash upon their presentation for redemption
by unitholders. As of June 30, 2002, we had redeemed 4,275 Units, for a
total of $102,279, including 3,980 Units redeemed by the Trust.
Shelf Registration Statement
We have an effective shelf registration statement on file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission that currently provides $500 million of equity capacity. The
debt portion of this shelf registration statement has been fully utilized after
our February 2001 and July 2002 senior unsecured note offerings.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
Portfolio and Other Financing Activity
Community and Land Dispositions
In January 2002, we sold two apartment communities in Houston comprising 502
apartment homes and a 13.3 acre parcel of land adjacent to one of the
communities. The net proceeds from these sales totaled $37 million and
were used to paydown outstanding borrowings under our credit facilities.
In March 2002, we sold an apartment community in Atlanta comprising 311
apartment homes. The net proceeds from this sale totaled $25 million
and were used to paydown outstanding borrowings under our credit facilities. The gain from the land sale was $0.8 million and the aggregate
gain from the sale of the previously depreciated operating real estate assets
was $20.1 million, all of which was recognized in the first quarter of
2002. In addition, during the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, we recognized
$0.0 million and $0.3 million, respectively, of deferred
gain associated with a parcel of land we sold in 2000. During the six months
ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, we recognized $0.1 million and $0.5 million,
respectively, of deferred gain associated with this land sale.
In March 2002, the Gables Residential Apartment Portfolio JV (the "GRAP
JV") sold two stabilized apartment communities located in Houston and South
Florida, comprising 702 apartment homes, for $59 million. Our share of
the net sales proceeds after repayment of construction loan indebtedness of $25
million was $6 million, resulting in a gain of $1.7 million, which was
recognized in the first quarter of 2002.
During 2001, we contributed our interest in certain land and development rights
to the Gables Residential Apartment Portfolio JV Two (the "GRAP JV
Two") in return for (1) cash of $18.5 million and (2) capital account
credit of $4.6 million. The $2.8 million of gain we will
record associated with this contribution is being recognized when earned using
the percentage of completion method since we serve as the developer and general
contractor for the joint venture. As of June 30, 2002, we had recognized
$2.5 million of this gain. We recognized $0.5 million and $0.3 million of this gain
during the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively, and $0.9
million and $0.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001,
respectively.
During 2001, we sold an apartment community located in Atlanta comprising
386 apartment homes, an apartment community located in Houston comprising 776
apartment homes, an apartment community located in Dallas comprising 536
apartment homes and a 2.5 acre parcel of land adjacent to one of our development
communities located in Atlanta. The net proceeds from these sales totaled
$93.6 million, $9 million of which was deposited into an escrow account and used
to fund acquisition activities. The balance of the net proceeds was used
to repay a $16 million note assumed in connection with our September 2001
acquisition of the Gables State Thomas Ravello community and to paydown
outstanding borrowings under interim financing vehicles. The gain from the land
sale was $0.9 million and the aggregate gain from the sale of previously depreciated operating real estate
assets was $34.1 million, all of which was recognized in 2001.
In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2001, we recognized $0.7 million of deferred gain associated with a
parcel of land we sold in 2000.
Community Acquisitions
On September 28, 2001, we acquired the 80% membership interest of our
venture partner in the GRAP JV in the Gables State Thomas Ravello apartment
community located in Dallas comprising 290 apartment homes. In
consideration for such community, we paid $12 million in cash and assumed a $16
million secured variable-rate note. This consideration was based on a
valuation of the asset of $31 million and is net of our $3 million share of the
venture distribution. We recorded a $5 million charge to unusual items in
the third quarter of 2001 associated with the write-off of building
components that will be replaced in connection with a remediation program to
address water infiltration issues plaguing the asset.
On August 28, 2001, we acquired an apartment community located in
Washington, D.C. comprising 82 apartment homes for approximately $25 million.
On August 1, 2001, we acquired the 75% interest of our venture partner in
the Gables Metropolitan Uptown apartment community located in Houston comprising
318 apartment homes. The asset was valued at approximately $27 million.
On March 30, 2001, we acquired the 80% membership interests of our venture
partner in the GRAP JV in the Gables Palma Vista and Gables San Michelle II
apartment communities located in South Florida comprising 532 apartment homes
for $66 million. This cash consideration was based on a valuation of the assets
of $75 million and is net of our $9 million share of the venture distribution.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
Other Acquisition
In May 2001, we acquired a property
management company based in Washington, D.C. that managed approximately 3,600
units in 24 multifamily apartment communities located in Washington, D.C. and
the surrounding area at the time of the acquisition (the "D.C. Management Co."). The total
investment is approximately $1.6 million and is structured to be paid in three
installments based on results of the acquired business operations.
Senior Unsecured Note Issuance
In February 2001, we issued $150 million of senior unsecured notes which
bear interest at an annual rate of 7.25%, were priced to yield 7.29% and mature in February 2006.
The net proceeds of $148.5 million were used to reduce borrowings under our
unsecured credit facilities and repay our $40 million term loan, which had a
November 2001 maturity date.
In July 2002, we issued $180 million of
senior unsecured notes which bear interest at an annual rate of 5.75%, were
priced to yield 5.81% and mature in July 2007. The net proceeds of $178
million were used to redeem all outstanding shares of the 8.3% Series A
Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares totaling $115 million on August 9, 2002 and to reduce borrowings under our
unsecured credit facilities.
Debt Refinancing
In May 2002, we called $48.4 million of
secured tax-exempt bond indebtedness with an interest rate of 6.375% and
re-issued the bonds on an unsecured basis at a rate of 4.75%. In
connection with the early extinguishment of debt, we incurred a prepayment
penalty of $1,451 and wrote-off unamortized deferred financing costs totaling
$236. Such charges totaling $1,687 are reflected as an extraordinary loss
in the statements of operations. The previous bonds required monthly
principal amortization payments that were retained in an escrow account and were not applied to reduce
the outstanding principal balance of the loan. Such principal payments
held in escrow totaling $4,121 were released in May 2002. This refinancing
transaction allowed us to improve our debt constant by 2.75%, unencumber six communities
comprising 2,028 apartment homes and achieve a positive net present value
result.
Critical Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Our financial
statements are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted
accounting principles ("GAAP") and a summary of our significant accounting
policies is included in Notes 4 and 5 to the consolidated financial statements
included in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001. Notes 5 and 6 to
the accompanying consolidated financial statements include a summary of recent accounting pronouncements and their
actual or expected impact on our financial statements. Our preparation of the
financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of our financial statements, and the reported
amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. There can be
no assurance that actual results will not differ from these estimates. As
an owner, operator and developer of apartment communities, our critical
accounting policies relate to cost capitalization and asset impairment
evaluation.
Cost Capitalization
As a vertically
integrated real estate company, we have in-house investment professionals
involved in development, construction and acquisition. We include direct
costs associated with development and construction activities in the capitalized
development cost of wholly-owned assets. We charge direct costs associated
with development and construction activities for third parties and
unconsolidated joint ventures against our revenues from the services being
provided. Such costs are ultimately reflected in net development
revenues using the percentage of completion method. As required by GAAP,
we expense all internal costs associated with the acquisition of operating
apartment communities to general and administrative expense in the period such
costs are incurred. We maintain staffing levels sufficient to meet
existing development, construction and acquisition activities. When market
conditions warrant, we adjust staffing levels to mitigate a negative impact on
results of operations.
Our real estate development pursuits are
subject to permits and other governmental approvals, as well as our ongoing
business review of the underlying real estate fundamentals and the impact on our
capital structure. We do not always move forward with development of our
real estate pursuits, and therefore, we evaluate the viability of real estate
pursuits and the recoverability of capitalized pursuit costs regularly. Based on this periodic review, we expense any costs that are deemed unrealizable
at that time to general and administrative expense.
During the development and construction of
a new apartment community, we capitalize related interest costs, as well as
other carrying costs such as property taxes and insurance. We begin to
expense these items as the construction of the community becomes substantially
complete and the residential apartment homes become available for initial
occupancy. Accordingly, we gradually reduce the amounts we capitalize as
construction is being completed. During the lease-up period, as a
community
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
transitions from initial occupancy to stabilized occupancy, revenues
are generally insufficient to cover interest, carrying costs and operating
expenses. The size and duration of this lease-up deficit depends on how
quickly construction is completed, how quickly the apartments available for
occupancy are leased, and what rent levels are achieved at the community.
Asset Impairment Evaluation
Under GAAP, real estate assets are stated
at the lower of depreciated cost or fair value, if deemed impaired. As
noted above, the cost of buildings and improvements includes interest, property
taxes, insurance, and allocated development overhead incurred during the
construction period. Ordinary repairs and maintenance are expensed as
incurred; major replacements and betterments are capitalized and depreciated
over their estimated useful lives. Depreciation is computed on a
straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of 20-40 years for buildings
and improvements and 5 years for furniture, fixtures and equipment. As required by GAAP, we periodically evaluate our real estate assets to
determine if there has been any impairment in their carrying value and record
impairment losses if there are indicators of impairment and the undiscounted
cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets
carrying amounts. At June 30, 2002, we did not own any real estate
assets that meet the impairment criteria.
Discontinued Operations
We adopted SFAS No. 144 effective
January 1, 2002 which requires, among other things, that the operating results
of certain real estate assets sold subsequent to January 1, 2002 be included in
discontinued operations in the statements of operations for all periods
presented. Three of our wholly-owned operating real estate assets and two
operating real estate assets owned by the GRAP JV were sold during the first
quarter of 2002. There were no asset sales during the second quarter of
2002.
We retained management of two of the three
wholly-owned assets and one of the two GRAP JV assets sold. Due to our
continuing involvement with the operations of the three assets sold that we are
continuing to manage, the operating results of these assets are included in
continuing operations. The operating results for both the wholly-owned asset
comprising 256 apartment homes located in Houston
and the GRAP JV asset comprising 382 apartment homes located in Houston sold that we are not continuing to manage are included in
discontinued operations in the statements of operations for all periods
presented. Interest expense has been allocated to the
results of the discontinued operations in accordance with EITF No. 87-24.
Condensed financial information of the
results of operations for the real estate assets sold included in discontinued
operations is as follows:
Three
Months |
Six
Months |
|||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
|||||
Total property revenues Equity in income of joint ventures Total revenues |
$
- |
$ 663 |
$ 197 |
$ 1,304 |
||||
Property operating and maintenance expense Real estate asset depreciation and amortization Interest expense Total expenses |
- - - - |
252 139 87 478 |
91 48 34 173 |
496 279 159 934 |
||||
Income from discontinued operations | - |
|
217 |
|
69 |
|
430 | |
Gain on disposition of discontinued operations | - | - | 2,945 |
|
- | |||
Income from discontinued operations |
$ - |
$ 217 | $3,014 | $ 430 |
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
Results of Operations
Comparison of operating results for the three months ended June 30, 2002 (the "2002 Period") to the three months ended June 30, 2001 (the "2001 Period").
Our net income is generated primarily from the operation of our apartment communities. For purposes of evaluating comparative operating performance, we categorize our operating communities based on the period each community reaches stabilized occupancy. A community is considered to have achieved stabilized occupancy on the earlier to occur of (1) attainment of 93% physical occupancy or (2) one year after completion of construction. The operating performance for all of our wholly-owned apartment communities combined for the three
months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 is summarized as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
||||||
|
|
$ |
%
Change |
|||
Rental and other property revenues: Same store communities (a) Triple net master lease communities (b) Development and lease-up communities (c) Renovation communities (d) Acquired communities (e) Sold communities (f) Total property revenues |
$47,296 1,646 2,143 3,162 1,537 - $55,784 |
$47,617 1,797 853 3,751 - 4,021 $58,039 |
$ (321 (151 1,290 (589 1,537 (4,021 $ (2,255 |
|
(0.7% (8.4% 151.2% ( 15.7% - ( 100.0% (3.9% |
|
Property operating and maintenance expenses |
|
|
|
|
||
Same store communities (a) |
$16,796 |
$15,630 |
$ 1,166 |
|
7.5% |
|
Revenues in excess of specified expenses |
$35,871 |
$39,283 |
$(3,412 |
) |
(8.7% |
) |
Revenues in excess of specified
expenses as a percentage of total |
|
|
|
|
) |
|
(a) Communities that were owned and fully stabilized throughout
both the
2002 Period and the 2001Period ("same store"). (b) Communities that were subject to a triple net master lease agreement throughout both the 2002 Period and the 2001 Period. (c) Communities in the development and/or lease-up phase that were not fully stabilized throughout both the 2002 Period and the 2001 Period. (d) Communities that were in renovation subsequent to April 1, 2001. (e) Communities that were acquired subsequent to April 1, 2001. (f) Communities that were sold subsequent to April 1, 2001 that are not included in discontinued operations. |
Total property revenues
decreased $2,255, or 3.9%, from $58,039 to $55,784 due to 2001 and 2002 sales of
apartment communities that are not reflected in discontinued operations, a
decrease in the number of available apartment homes due to renovations, and a
decrease in same-store performance as a result of national economic weakness. These decreases were
partially offset by an increase in the number of
apartment homes resulting from the development and acquisition of additional
communities. Below is additional data regarding the changes in total property revenues for
two of the six community categories presented in the preceding table:
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
Same store communities:
Market |
Number of Communities |
Number of Apartment Homes |
% of 2002 Period NOI |
Physical Occupancy During the 2002 Period |
Change in Physical Occupancy |
$ Change in Revenues |
% Change in Revenues | |||
South Florida |
16 16 14 7 7 4 64 |
4,549 5,020 3,613 1,677 1,423 1,243 17,525 |
29.2% 26.1% 18.9% 11.6% 9.4% 4.8% 100.0% |
92.6% 93.0% 91.7% 92.9% 95.5% 90.4% 92.7% |
( 1.1% |
) |
$151 |
|
1.2% |
|
Development and lease-up communities:
|
Number of Communities |
Number of Apartment Homes |
% of Total Apartment Homes |
Physical Occupancy During the 2002 Period |
Change in Revenues |
Orlando Houston Atlanta Dallas |
1 1 2 1 5 |
315 296 263 177 1,051 |
30.0% 28.2% 25.0% 16.8% 100.0% |
58.1% 40.4% 22.8% 94.9% 50.6% |
$ 371 380 319 220 $1,290 |
Property management revenues increased
$349, or 23.6%, from $1,478 to $1,827 due primarily to the May 2001 acquisition
of the D.C. Management Co.
Development revenues, net decreased $335, or
82.9%, from $404 to $69 due primarily to a decrease in development and construction services provided to third
parties.
Our share of the operating results for the apartment communities in which we have a joint venture interest for the
2002 Period and 2001 Period is as follows:
2002 Period |
|||||
Stabilized (a) |
Development
|
Sales (c) |
Total |
2001 |
Gables' share of joint venture results: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Communities that were owned and fully stabilized throughout
the 2002 Period. (b) Communities in the development and/or lease-up phase that were not fully stabilized during all or any of the 2002 Period. (c) Communities that were sold subsequent to April 1, 2002 that are not included in discontinued operations. |
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
Interest income
decreased $107, or 47.1%, from $227 to $120 due to a decrease in interest-bearing
deposits and a decrease in interest rates.
Other revenues increased $37, or 4.8%,
from $768 to $805 due to an increase in revenues from our third-party brokerage
and corporate rental housing services, offset by income earned during the 2001
Period related to certain non-routine items.
Property operating and maintenance expense (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization) increased $1,157, or 6.2%, from $18,756 to $19,913 due to an increase in the number of apartment homes resulting from the development and
acquisition of additional communities, as well as same-store expenses increasing
at a rate ahead of inflation due to increasing insurance costs, along with
higher turnover and marketing costs associated with the current national
economic conditions. This
increase is offset in part by the 2001 and 2002 sales of apartment communities.
Real estate depreciation and amortization expense
increased $723, or 6.3%, from $11,482 to $12,205 due primarily to the impact of the development and acquisition of additional communities and capital improvements made to existing operating communities, offset by the impact of the
2001 and 2002 sales of apartment communities.
Property management expense for owned communities and third party properties on a combined basis increased $504, or 19.4%, from $2,604 to $3,108 due primarily to the May 2001 acquisition of the D.C. Management Co. We allocate property management expenses to both owned communities and third-party properties based on the proportionate share of total apartment homes and units managed.
Interest expense and credit enhancement fees decreased $1,495, or 12.8%, from $11,694 to $10,199 due primarily to a decrease in outstanding indebtedness associated with the 2001 and 2002 sales of apartment communities and a decrease in interest rates. These decreases are offset in part by an increase in operating debt associated with the development and acquisition of additional communities.
General and administrative expense
increased $79, or 4.7%, from $1,674 to $1,753 due primarily to inflationary
increases in expenses.
Corporate asset depreciation and
amortization increased $236, or 122.9%, from $192 to $428 due to (1) an increase
in amortization resulting from the management contracts acquired in connection
with the May 2001 acquisition of the D.C. Management Co. and (2) the depreciation of
our new general ledger and web-based property management system,
eGables, beginning January 2002.
Gain on sale of land and development rights of
$462 in the 2002 Period relates to
recognition of deferred gain associated with the 2001 contribution of
land and development rights into the GRAP JV Two.
Gain on sale of previously depreciated
operating real estate assets of $7,386 in the 2001 Period relates to the sale
of a community in Atlanta comprising 386 apartment homes.
Gain on sale of land and development
rights of $580 in the 2001 Period is comprised of (1) $289 associated with the
2001 contribution of land
into the GRAP JV and (2) recognition of $291 of deferred gain associated with a land sale in 2000.
Extraordinary loss from early
extinguishment of debt of $1,687 in the 2002 Period
represents the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs totaling $236
and a prepayment penalty of $1,451 associated with the early retirement of $48.4
million of secured tax-exempt bond indebtedness that had an interest rate of
6.375%. We were able to reissue these bonds on an unsecured basis at a
rate of 4.75%, resulting in a positive net present value.
Comparison of operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2002 (the "2002 Period")
to the six months ended June 30, 2001 (the
"2001 Period").
Our net income is generated primarily from
the operation of our apartment communities. For purposes of evaluating
comparative operating performance, we categorize our operating communities based
on the period each community reaches stabilized occupancy. A community is
considered to have achieved stabilized occupancy on the earlier to occur of (1)
attainment of 93% physical occupancy or (2) one year after completion of
construction. The operating performance for all of our wholly-owned apartment
communities combined for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 is
summarized as follows:
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
Six Months |
|||||||||
$
Change |
%
Change |
||||||||
Rental and other property revenues: Same store communities (a) Triple net master lease communities (b) Development and lease-up communities (c) Renovation communities (d) Acquired communities (e) Sold communities (f) Total property revenues |
|
|
$ $ |
90,739 3,124 1,270 7,541 2,250 8,622 113,546 |
$ $ |
|
|
(0.1% 5.4% 200.1% (12.8% 237.7% (89.6% (0.7% |
|
Property operating and maintenance expenses |
|
31,905 - 2,032 2,683 2,281 277 39,178 |
$ $ |
|
$ $ |
|
|
|
|
Revenues in excess of specified expenses |
$ |
73,626 |
$ |
76,963 |
$ |
(3,337 |
) |
(4.3% |
) |
Revenues in excess of specified
expenses as a |
|
|
|
|
) |
||||
(a)
Communities that were owned and fully stabilized throughout both the
2002 Period and the 2001 Period ("same store"). (b) Communities that were subject to a triple net master lease agreement throughout both the 2002 Period and the 2001 Period. (c) Communities in the development and/or lease-up phase that were not fully stabilized throughout both the 2002 Period and the 2001 Period. (d) Communities that were in renovation subsequent to January 1, 2001. (e) Communities that were acquired subsequent to January 1, 2001. (f) Communities that were sold subsequent to January 1, 2001 that are not included in discontinued operations. |
Total property revenues decreased $742, or 0.7%, from
$113,546 to $112,804 due to 2001 and 2002 sales of apartment communities that
are not reflected in discontinued operations, a decrease in the number of
available apartment homes due to renovations and a decrease in same-store
performance as a result of national economic weakness. These decreases
were partially offset by an increase in the number of apartment homes resulting from
the development and acquisition of additional communities. Below is additional data
regarding the changes in total property revenues for two of the six community
categories presented in the preceding table:
Same store communities:
Market |
Number
of |
Number
of Apartment Homes |
% of 2002 Period NOI |
Physical Occupancy During the 2002 Period |
Change in Physical Occupancy |
$ Change in Revenues |
% Change in Revenues |
Houston |
16 |
5,020 4,017 3,613 1,677 1,423 1,243 16,993 |
27.5% 25.2% 20.2% 12.3% 9.8% 5.0% 100.0% |
93.9% |
(0.4%) |
$1,251 522 (910) (604) (55) (311) $(107) |
5.2% |
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
Development and lease-up communities:
Market |
Number of Communities |
Number of Apartment Homes |
% of Total Apartment Homes |
Physical Occupancy During the 2002 Period |
Change in Revenues |
Orlando |
1 |
315 |
30.0% |
54.4% |
$823 |
Property management revenues increased
$697, or 23.8%, from $2,926 to $3,623
due primarily to the May 2001 acquisition of the D.C. Management Co.
2002 Period |
||||||||||
Gables' share of joint venture results: Rental and other revenues Property operating and maintenance expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) Revenues in excess of specified expenses Interest expense Amortization of deferred costs Other Funds from operations Gain on sale of real estate assets Real estate asset depreciation Equity in income of joint ventures Number of operating communities Number of units in operating communities Average percent occupied during the period |
Stabilized (a) |
Development |
Sales (c) |
Total |
2001 |
|||||
$ 1,552 |
|
$ 671 |
|
$ 169 |
|
$ 2,392 |
|
$ 3,121 |
|
|
(a) Communities
that were owned and fully stabilized throughout the
2002 Period. (b) Communities in the development and/or lease-up phase that were not fully stabilized during all or any of the 2002 Period. (c) Communities that were sold subsequent to January 1, 2002 that are not included in discontinued operations. |
Interest income decreased
$273, or 60.1%, from $454 to $181 due to a decrease in interest-bearing deposits
and a decrease in interest rates.
Other revenues increased
$756, or 76.0%, from $995 to $1,751
due to an increase in revenues from our third-party brokerage and corporate
rental housing services, offset by income earned during the 2001 Period related
to certain non-routine items.
Property operating and maintenance expense (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization) increased $2,595, or 7.1%, from $36,583 to $39,178 due to an
increase in the number of apartment homes
resulting from the development and acquisition of additional communities, as
well as same-store expenses increasing at a rate ahead of inflation due to
increasing insurance costs, along with higher turnover and marketing costs
associated with the current national economic conditions. This increase is offset in part by the 2001 and
2002 sales of apartment communities.
Real estate depreciation and amortization expense increased
$1,979, or 8.9%, from $22,216 to $24,195 due primarily to the impact of the development and
acquisition of additional communities and capital improvements made to existing
operating communities, offset by the impact of the 2001 and 2002 sales of apartment
communities.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
Property management expense for owned communities and third party properties on
a combined basis increased $1,576, or 30.5%, from $5,166 to $6,742 due primarily to
the May 2001 acquisition of the D.C. Management Co. and certain software
licensing fees incurred in the 2002 Period. We allocate property
management expenses to both owned communities and third party properties based
on the proportionate share of total apartment homes and units managed.
Interest expense and credit enhancement fees decreased
$1,891, or 8.5%, from $22,371 to $20,480 due primarily to a decrease in
outstanding indebtedness associated with the 2001 and 2002 sales of apartment
communities and a decrease in interest rates. These decreases are offset
in part by an increase in operating debt associated with the development and
acquisition of additional communities.
General and administrative expense
increased $118, or 3.3%, from $3,557 to $3,675 due primarily to inflationary
increases in expenses.
Corporate asset depreciation and
amortization increased $541, or 159.1%, from $340 to $881 due to (1) an increase
in amortization resulting from the management contracts acquired in connection
with the May 2001 acquisition of the D.C. Management Co. and (2) the
depreciation of our new general ledger and web-based property management system,
eGables, beginning January 2002.
Unusual items of $400 in the 2001 Period represent a reserve associated with our
equity investment in Broadband Residential, Inc., a high speed internet access
provider.
Gain on sale of previously depreciated
operating real estate assets of $17,906 in the 2002 Period relates to the sale
of two wholly-owned communities comprising 557 apartment homes located in
Houston and Atlanta in the 2002 Period.
Gain on sale of land and development rights
of $1,801 in the 2002 Period is comprised of (1) $763 associated with the sale
of 13.3 acres of land in Houston in the 2002 Period, (2) recognition of $953 in
deferred gain associated with the contribution of land and development rights
into the GRAP JV Two in the 2002 Period, and (3) recognition of $85 of deferred
gain associated with a land sale in 2000.
Gain on sale of previously depreciated
operating real estate assets of $7,386 in the 2001 Period is related to the sale of an apartment community in Atlanta comprising
386 apartment homes.
Gain on sale of land and development rights
of $2,218 in the 2001 Period is comprised of (1) $944 associated with the sale of 2.5 acres of
land in Atlanta in the 2001 Period, (2) $747 associated with the contribution of
land into the GRAP Two JV in the 2001 period and (3) recognition of $527 of
deferred gain associated with a land sale in 2000.
Income from discontinued operations increased
$2,584, or 600.9%, from $430 to $3,014 due primarily
to the $2,945 gain on disposition of discontinued operations recognized in the 2002 Period.
Extraordinary loss from early
extinguishment of debt of $1,687 in the 2002 Period
represents the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs totaling $236
and a prepayment penalty of $1,451 associated with the early retirement of $48.4
million of secured tax-exempt bond indebtedness that had an interest rate of
6.375%. We were able to reissue these bonds on an unsecured basis at a
rate of 4.75%, resulting in a positive net present value.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net cash provided by operating
activities of continuing operations increased from $51,663 for the six months ended
June 30, 2001 to $53,028 for the six months ended June 30, 2002
due to (1) a change in other assets between periods of $5,951 and (2) a change
in restricted cash between periods of $249. Such
increases were offset in part by (1) a decrease of $1,885 in income from continuing operations (a) before certain non-cash or non-operating items, including depreciation, amortization, equity in income of joint
ventures, gain on sale of real estate assets, long-term compensation expense,
extraordinary loss, and unusual items and (b) after operating distributions received from
joint
ventures, and (2) a change in other liabilities between periods of $2,950. Net
cash provided by operating activities of discontinued operations decreased from
$893 to $194 due to the disposition of discontinued operations in the 2002
Period.
We had $68,465 of net cash used in investing
activities for the six months ended June 30, 2001 compared to $16,982 of net
cash provided by investing activities for the six months ended June 30,
2002. During the six months
ended June 30, 2002, we expended $39.1 million related to development
expenditures, $6.4 million related to recurring, non-revenue enhancing
capital expenditures for operating apartment communities, $4.7 million
related to non-recurring, renovation/revenue enhancing capital expenditures, and
$0.8 million related to our investment in joint ventures. During the six months ended June 30, 2002, we received
cash of (1) $46.8 million in connection with the sale of wholly-owned real
estate assets, (2) $18.4 million in connection
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
with the disposition of
discontinued operations and (3) $3.0 million in connection with our share of the net proceeds from the sale of joint venture real estate assets.
During the six months ended June 30, 2001, we expended $108.5 million related to
development expenditures, $5.7 million related to recurring, non-revenue enhancing capital expenditures for operating apartment communities,
$5.3 million related to non-recurring, renovation/revenue enhancing capital
expenditures, $2.3 million related to our investment in joint ventures, and $3.1 million related to other
investments. In addition, during the six months ended June 30, 2001, we
deposited $1.3 million, net, into an escrow account to fund acquisition
activities. During the
six months ended June 30, 2001, we received cash of (1) $18.4 million in connection with our contribution of interests in certain land and development rights to
the
GRAP JV Two and (2) $39.4 million in connection with the sale of wholly-owned
real estate assets.
We had $16,875 of net cash provided by financing
activities for the six months ended June 30, 2001 compared to $69,571 of net cash used in financing activities for the
six months ended June 30,
2002. During the six months ended June 30, 2002, we paid distributions totaling $44.0 million, had net repayments of borrowings of $33.9
million, a prepayment penalty of $1.5 million, and deferred financing costs of
$1.0 million. These payments were offset by proceeds from the exercise of
share options of $7.3 million and principal payments released from escrow, net, of
$3.6 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2001, we had net borrowings of
$52.4 million and proceeds from the exercise of share options of $7.6 million. These net borrowings and share option proceeds were offset by payments for
distributions totaling
$41.0 million and deferred financing costs of $1.8 million.
The Trust has elected to be taxed as a REIT under
the Internal Revenue Code. To qualify as a REIT, the Trust must meet a number of
organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that it
currently distribute at least 90% of the REIT's ordinary taxable income to
shareholders. It is the current intention of the Trust to adhere to these requirements
and maintain its REIT status. As a REIT, the Trust generally will not be subject
to federal income tax on distributed taxable income. We utilize Gables
Residential Services, a taxable REIT subsidiary, to provide management and other
services to third parties that a REIT may be prohibited from providing.
Taxable REIT subsidiaries are subject to federal, state and local income taxes.
As of June 30, 2002, we had total
indebtedness of $843,370, cash and cash equivalents of $4,864, and principal escrow deposits reflected in restricted cash of
$462. Our indebtedness has an average of 3.8 years to maturity at June
30, 2002. The aggregate maturities of notes payable at June 30, 2002 are as follows:
|
Balloon Principal Payment due at Maturity |
Total |
|
2002 |
$ 1,838 |
$ 82,392 |
$84,230 |
Development and Lease-up Communities at June 30, 2002: | ||||||||||
Percent at June 30, 2002 |
Actual or Estimated Quarter of |
|||||||||
Community |
No. of |
Total |
Cost to Complete |
Complete |
Leased | Occupied |
Constr- |
Initial |
Constr- |
Stab- |
(millions) |
(millions) |
(a) |
Wholly-Owned Development and Lease-up Communities: | ||||||||||
Atlanta, GA | ||||||||||
Gables Montclair | 183 | $ 23 | $ 2 | 94% | 69% |
45% |
3 Q 2000 | 4 Q 2001 | 3 Q 2002 | 1 Q 2003 |
Gables Rock Springs (b) | 255 | 29 | 25 | 15% | - | - | 4 Q 2001 | 2 Q 2002 | 3 Q 2004 | 4 Q 2004 |
Dallas, TX | ||||||||||
Gables Ellis Street | 245 | 46 | 18 | 56% | 6% |
- |
3 Q 2001 | 3 Q 2002 | 3 Q 2003 | 3 Q 2004 |
Gables State Thomas Ravello | 290 | 46 | 15 | 67% | - |
- |
4 Q 2001 | 1 Q 2003 | 3 Q 2003 | 3 Q 2004 |
Houston, TX | ||||||||||
Gables Meyer Park II | 296 | 27 | 1 |
97% |
66% |
53% |
4 Q 2000 | 3 Q 2001 | 3 Q 2002 | 4 Q 2002 |
Tampa, FL | ||||||||||
Gables Beach Park | 166 | 22 |
21 |
- |
- |
- |
4 Q 2002 |
4 Q 2003 |
2 Q 2004 | 2 Q 2004 |
Subtotals | 1,435 | $193 | $ 82 | |||||||
Co-Investment Development and Lease-up Communities (c): |
||||||||||
Atlanta, GA | ||||||||||
Gables Metropolitan II |
274 |
$ 32 |
$ 7 |
79% |
22% |
12% |
1 Q 2001 |
2 Q 2002 | 4 Q 2002 | 3 Q 2003 |
Tampa, FL | ||||||||||
Gables West Park Village II | 297 | 27 | 23 | 2% | - | - |
2 Q 2002 |
2 Q 2003 | 4 Q 2003 | 2 Q 2004 |
Subtotals | 571 | $ 59 | $ 30 |
(d) |
||||||
Development/Leaseup Totals 2,006 $252 $112 |
||||||||||
Wholly-Owned Completed Communities in Lease-Up: | ||||||||||
Gables Paces | 80 | $23 |
100% |
28% |
24% |
3 Q 2000 | 1 Q 2002 | 2 Q 2002 | 2 Q 2003 | |
Gables North Village | 315 | 44 |
100% |
73% |
67% |
4 Q 1999 |
4 Q 2000 |
2 Q 2002 | 1 Q 2003 | |
Subtotals | 395 | $ 67 | ||||||||
Co-Investment Completed Communities in Lease-up (c): | ||||||||||
Houston, TX | ||||||||||
Gables White Oak | 186 | $15 | 100% | 88% | 72% | 2 Q 2001 | 4 Q 2001 | 2 Q 2002 | 3 Q 2002 | |
Tampa, FL | ||||||||||
Gables
West Park Village I (e) |
320 |
35 |
100% | 75% | 68% |
4 Q 2000 |
3 Q 2001 | 2 Q 2002 | 1 Q 2003 | |
Subtotals |
506 |
$50 |
|
(a) Stabilized occupancy is defined as the earlier to occur of (i) 93% physical occupancy
or (ii) one year after completion of construction.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS Community June 30, 2002 MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS Community June 30, 2002 Austin, TX Grand Totals/Averages $ 990
(b) This community represents the reconstruction of 124 apartment homes
previously owned and operated by us into 255 apartment homes.
The first phase of 22 apartment homes was substantially
complete at June 30, 2002. The second phase of 233 apartment homes is
expected to be
substantially complete by September 30, 2004. The
remaining 166 apartment homes in this community are still being operated by us.
(c) These communities are owned by the Gables Residential Apartment Portfolio JV
Two in which we have a 20% interest.
(d) Construction loan proceeds are expected to fund $22 million of the costs to
complete at June 30, 2002. The remaining costs will be funded by
capital
contributions to the venture from our venture partner
and us in a funding ratio of 80% and 20%, respectively.
(e) This community includes 40,000 square feet of commercial space
which was 100% leased at June 30, 2002.
The following is a "Safe Harbor" Statement under the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The projections and estimates contained in the
table above are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements
involve risks and uncertainties and actual results may differ materially from
those projected in such statements. Risks associated with our development,
construction, and lease-up activities, which could impact the forward-looking
statements made, include: development opportunities may be abandoned;
construction costs of a community may exceed original estimates, possibly making
the community uneconomical; and construction and lease-up may not be completed
on schedule, resulting in increased debt service and construction costs.
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
Stabilized Apartment Communities at June 30, 2002
No.
of
Apt.
Homes
OccupancyJune
30, 2002 Scheduled Rent Per
Unit Square Foot
Houston,
TX
Gables Austin Colony
Gables Bradford Place
Gables Bradford Pointe
Gables Champions
Gables Cityscape
Gables Citywalk/
Waterford Sq.
Gables Edgewater
Gables Lions Head
Gables Metropolitan Uptown
Gables Meyer Park I
Gables of First Colony
Gables Piney Point
Gables Pin Oak Green
Gables Pin Oak Park
Gables Rivercrest I
Gables Rivercrest II
Gables Windmill
Landing
Totals/Averages
Atlanta, GA
Briarcliff Gables
Buckhead Gables
Gables Cityscape
Gables Metropolitan I (JV)
Gables Mill
Gables Northcliff
Gables Vinings
Gables Walk
Gables Wood Arbor
Gables Wood Crossing
Gables Wood Glen
Gables Wood Knoll
Lakes at Indian Creek
Rock Springs Estates
Roswell Gables I
Roswell Gables II
Spalding Gables
Wildwood Gables
Totals/Averages
Boca Raton, FL
Cotton Bay
Gables Crestwood (JV)
Gables Boca Place
Gables Boynton Beach I
Gables Boynton Beach II
Gables Kings Colony
Gables Mizner on the Green
Gables Palma Vista
Gables San Remo
Gables Town Colony
Gables Town Place
Gables Wellington
Hampton Lakes
Hampton Place
Mahogany Bay
San Michele I
San Michele II
Vinings at Hampton Village
Totals/ Averages
237
372
360
404
252
317
292
277
318
345
324
246
581
474
140
140
259
5,338
104
162
182
435
438
82
315
310
140
268
380
312
603
166
384
284
252
546
5,363
444
290
180
252
296
480
246
189
180
172
312
222
300
368
328
249
343
168
5,019
96%
96%
96%
92%
91%
93%
98%
98%
95%
94%
97%
97%
93%
94%
84%
96%
93%
95%
95%
96%
95%
92%
93%
89%
95%
96%
88%
85%
88%
93%
87%
93%
93%
93%
93%
89%
93%
95%
97%
78%
96%
96%
97%
88%
96%
97%
92%
94%
90%
96%
95%
92%
88%
85%
92%
93%
(a)
(a)
(a)
$ 991
797
709
854
1,018
999
905
800
1,114
961
999
971
1,093
1,120
800
795
732
$ 940
$1,196
890
946
1,217
906
1,285
1,089
1,188
797
777
741
773
684
998
960
960
982
1,019
$ 942
$763
1,100
1,058
986
981
892
1,728
1,619
1,320
899
896
1,049
831
795
827
1,550
1,524
877
$1,060
$1.01
0.93
0.92
0.94
1.19
1.24
1.03
0.95
1.22
1.12
1.01
1.05
1.07
1.10
0.95
0.94
0.84
$1.04
$0.96
1.18
1.14
1.09
0.98
0.82
1.02
1.00
0.87
0.81
0.75
0.78
0.75
1.00
0.88
0.82
0.99
0.90
$0.89
$0.78
0.87
1.08
0.82
0.81
1.00
1.37
1.12
0.72
1.05
1.07
0.78
0.79
0.83
0.82
1.16
1.10
0.73
$0.93
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
Stabilized Apartment Communities as of June 30, 2002
No.
of
Apt.
Homes
Occupancy
June 30, 2002 Scheduled Rent Per
Unit
Square Foot
Gables at the Terrace
Gables Barton Creek
Gables Bluffstone
Gables Central Park
Gables Great Hills
Gables Park Mesa
Gables Town Lake
Totals/Averages
Dallas, TX
Gables at Pearl Street
Gables CityPlace
Gables Green Oaks
Gables Mirabella
Gables San Raphael (JV)
Gables Spring Park
Gables State Thomas Townhomes
Gables Turtle Creek
Gables Valley Ranch
Totals/Averages
Memphis, TN
Arbors of Harbortown (JV)
Gables Cordova
Gables Stonebridge (JV)
Totals/Averages
Nashville, TN
Brentwood Gables (JV)
Gables Hendersonville (JV)
Gables Hickory Hollow I
Gables Hickory Hollow II
Totals/Averages
Orlando, FL
Gables Celebration
Gables Chatham Square (b)
The Commons at Little Lake Bryan (b)
Totals/Averages
Washington D.C.
Gables Dupont Circle
Totals/Averages
308
160
256
273
276
148
256
1,677
108
232
300
126
222
188
177
150
319
1,822
345
464
500
1,309
254
364
276
272
1,166
231
448
280
959
82
82
92%
98%
96%
91%
92%
90%
96%
93%
95%
97%
95%
99%
93%
94%
91%
97%
96%
95%
92%
95%
92%
93%
98%
93%
92%
86%
92%
89%
100%
100%
97%
96%
96%
$1,143
1,464
1,080
1,342
870
1,230
1,360
$1,192
$1,345
1,381
863
1,196
964
981
1,992
1,197
956
$1,159
$865
689
689
$735
$911
688
655
649
$719
$1,194
--
--
$1,194
$2,665
$2,665
$1.20
1.26
1.10
1.42
1.05
1.13
1.46
$1.24
$1.23
1.31
0.90
1.31
1.07
0.93
1.33
1.19
0.94
$1.11
$0.87
0.74
0.78
$0.79
$0.80
0.73
0.73
0.68
$0.74
$1.03
--
--
$1.03
$2.74
$2.74
22,735
93%
$0.98
(a)
(b)
This property is in
renovation; therefore, occupancy is based on apartment homes available for
lease.
This property is
leased to a single user group pursuant to a triple net master lease.
Accordingly, scheduled rent data is not reflected
as it is not comparable to the rest of our portfolio.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
Portfolio Indebtedness Summary at June 30, 2002 | ||||
Type of Indebtedness |
Balance |
Interest Rate (a) |
Total Rate (b) |
Years to Maturity |
Fixed Rate: | ||||
Unsecured fixed-rate notes |
412,674 |
7. 14% |
7. 14% |
2. 79 |
Secured fixed-rate notes |
138,101 |
7.71% |
7.71% |
5.81 |
Total fixed-rate indebtedness |
$571,530 |
7.23% |
7.26% |
3.88 |
Variable Rate: |
|
|
|
|
Tax-exempt variable-rate loans |
$170,955 |
1.28% |
2.27% |
4.08 |
Unsecured variable-rate credit facilities |
100,885 |
2.56% |
2.56% |
2.87 |
Total variable-rate indebtedness |
$271,840 |
1.76% |
2.38% |
3.63 |
Total portfolio debt (c), (d) |
$843,370 |
5.47% |
5.69% |
3.80 |
(a) Interest Rate represents the weighted average interest rate incurred on our indebtedness, exclusive of deferred financing cost amortization and credit enhancement fees, as applicable. (b) Total Rate represents the Interest Rate (a) plus credit enhancement fees, as applicable. (c) Interest associated with construction activities is capitalized as a cost of development and does not impact current earnings. The qualifying construction expenditures at June 30, 2002 for purposes of interest capitalization were $108,413. (d) Excludes (i) $16.4 million of tax-exempt bonds related to a joint venture in which we own a 25% interest, (ii) $82.0 million of indebtedness related to joint ventures in which we own a 20% interest, and (iii) $52.1 million of indebtedness related to a joint venture in which we own an 8.3% interest. |
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCUSSION - Funds From Operations and Adjusted Funds From Operations
We consider funds from operations ("FFO") to be a useful performance measure of the operating performance of an equity REIT because, together with net income and cash flows, FFO provides investors with an additional basis to evaluate the ability of a REIT to incur and service debt and to fund distributions and capital expenditures. We believe that in order to facilitate a clear understanding of our operating results, FFO should be examined in conjunction with net income as presented in the financial statements and data included elsewhere in this
report. FFO is determined based on the Board of Governors of the National
Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts
("NAREIT"). FFO, as defined by NAREIT, represents net income (loss) determined in accordance with GAAP, excluding extraordinary items as defined under GAAP and gains or losses from sales of
previously depreciated operating real estate assets, plus certain non-cash items
such as real estate asset depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. FFO presented herein is not necessarily comparable to FFO presented by other real estate companies due to the fact that not all real estate companies use the same definition. However, our FFO is comparable to the FFO of real estate companies that use the
NAREIT definition. Adjusted funds from operations ("AFFO") is defined as FFO less recurring, non-revenue enhancing capital expenditures. FFO and AFFO should not be considered alternatives to net income as indicators of our operating performance or as alternatives to cash flows as measures of liquidity. FFO does not measure whether cash flow is sufficient to fund all of our cash needs, including principal amortization, capital expenditures, and distributions
to unitholders. Additionally, FFO does not represent cash flows from operating, investing or financing activities as defined by GAAP. Reference is made to "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources" for a discussion of our cash needs and cash flows. A reconciliation of FFO and AFFO follows:
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Property and Per Unit Data)
Three
Months |
Six Months |
|||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2002 | 2001 | |||||
Net income available to common unitholders | $ 6,019 |
|
$ 18,881 |
$38,064 | $30,205 | |||
Extraordinary loss Real estate depreciation and amortization: Wholly-owned real estate assets - continuing operations Wholly-owned real estate assets - discontinued operations Joint venture real estate assets - continuing operations Joint venture real estate assets - discontinued operations Total |
1,687 12,205 - - 342 - 12,547 |
- 11,482 139 388 54 12,063 |
1,687 24,195 48 693 51 24,987 |
- |
||||
Gain on sale of previously
depreciated operating real estate assets: Wholly-owned real estate assets - continuing operations Wholly-owned real estate assets - discontinued operations Joint venture real estate assets - continuing operations Joint venture real estate assets - discontinued operations Total |
- - - - - - - |
|
(7,386 - - - - - (7,386 |
|
(17,906 (2,198 (1,007 (747 (21,858 |
|
(7,386 - - - - - (7,386 |
|
Funds from operations - basic and diluted | $ 20,253 | $23,558 | $42,880 | $46,280 | ||||
Recurring, non-revenue enhancing
capital expenditures: Carpet and flooring Appliances Other additions and improvements Total capital expenditures |
$ 1,630 199 1,701 3,530 |
$ 1,234 158 1,779 3,171 |
$ 2,842 351 3,171 6,364 |
$ 2,045 332 3,336 5,713 |
||||
Adjusted funds from operations - diluted | $16,723 | $20,387 |
$36,516 | $40,567 | ||||
Average Units outstanding - basic |
30,762 | 30,051 |
30,634 | 29,956 | ||||
Average Units outstanding - diluted | 30,931 | 30,212 |
30,802 | 30,113 |
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our capital structure includes the use of variable rate and fixed rate indebtedness. As such, we are exposed to the impact of changes in interest rates. We periodically seek input from third-party consultants regarding market interest rate and credit risk in order to evaluate our interest rate exposure. In certain situations, we may utilize derivative financial instruments in the form of rate caps, rate swaps or rate locks to hedge interest rate exposure by modifying the interest rate characteristics of related balance sheet instruments and prospective financing transactions. We do not utilize such instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
We typically refinance maturing debt instruments at then-existing market interest rates and at terms which may be more or less than the interest rates and terms on the maturing debt.
Refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2001 for detailed disclosure about quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk. Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk have not materially changed since
December 31, 2001.
Item 1: |
Legal Proceedings |
||
|
|
None |
|
Item 2: |
Changes in Securities |
||
|
|
Each time the Trust issues shares of beneficial interest, it contributes the proceeds of such issuance to us in return for a like number of Units with rights and preferences analogous to the shares issued. During the period commencing April 1, 2002 and ending June 30, 2002, in connection with issuances of common shares by the Trust during that time period, the Operating Partnership issued an aggregate 73,257 Units to the Trust. Such Units were issued in reliance on an exemption from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. |
|
Item 3: |
Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
||
|
|
None |
|
Item 4: |
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
||
|
|
None |
|
Item 5: |
Other Information |
||
|
|
None |
|
Item 6: |
Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K |
||
|
(a) |
Exhibits |
|
10.1* Fourth Amended and Restated $225 million Revolving Credit
Facility dated June 27, 2002, by and among Gables Realty Limited Partnership and Gables-Tennessee Properties, L.L.C. (as the Borrowers) and Wachovia Bank, N.A., Wachovia Securities, Inc., J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, AmSouth Bank, PNC Bank, National Association, SouthTrust Bank, Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and Suntrust Bank (collectively, as Lenders) and Wachovia Bank, N.A. (as agent). |
|||
(b) |
Reports on Form 8-K |
||
(i) A Form 8-K was filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 30, 2002 to disclose a change in our certifying accountants from Arthur Andersen LLP to Deloitte & Touche LLP. - ---------- * Filed herewith |
|||
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
GABLES REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By: Gables GP, Inc. Its: General Partner |
Date: |
August 14, 2002 |
|
/s/ Marvin R. Banks, Jr. |
|
|
|
Marvin R. Banks, Jr. |
|