Back to GetFilings.com

Use these links to rapidly review the document
HUNTSMAN INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LLC FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

Commission file number 333-88057

HUNTSMAN INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LLC
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý    No o

        On November 13, 2002, 1,000 member equity units of Huntsman International Holdings LLC were outstanding. As of such date, such member equity units were held 60% by Huntsman Specialty Chemicals Corporation (an affiliate of Huntsman International Holdings LLC), approximately 1% by HMP Equity Holdings Corporation (an affiliate of Huntsman International Holdings LLC), 30% by Imperial Chemicals Industries PLC and its affiliates and approximately 9% by institutional investors. There is no established trading market for the member equity units of Huntsman International Holdings LLC.

HUNTSMAN INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LLC
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002

TABLE OF CONTENTS

        Some of the statements contained in this report are forward-looking in nature. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as "believes," "expects," "may," "will," "should" or "anticipates" or the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy. You are cautioned that our business and operations are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties, and, consequently, our actual results may differ materially from those projected by any forward-looking statements. Some of those risks and uncertainties are discussed below in "Item 2—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Cautionary Statement for Forward-Looking Information" and elsewhere in this report. We make no commitment to revise or update any forward-looking statements in order to reflect events or circumstances after the date any such statement is made.

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

HUNTSMAN INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in Millions)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

1

HUNTSMAN INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in Millions)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

2

HUNTSMAN INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY (UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in Millions)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

3

HUNTSMAN INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in Millions)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

4

HUNTSMAN INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

1.    GENERAL

Description of Business

        Huntsman International Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the "Company"), through its subsidiaries, is a global manufacturer and marketer of specialty and commodity chemicals. As of September 30, 2002, the Company was owned 60% by Huntsman Specialty Chemicals Corporation ("Huntsman Specialty"), 30% by Imperial Chemicals Industries PLC ("ICI") and its affiliates and 10% by institutional investors. On November 8, 2002, HMP Equity Holdings Corporation ("HMP"), an affiliate of the Company and the direct or indirect parent of Huntsman Specialty and Huntsman Company LLC ("Huntsman Company"), acquired 1.11% of the Company's membership interests that previously had been held by institutional investors. The Company's direct wholly-owned operating subsidiary is Huntsman International LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Huntsman International"). For convenience in this report, where the context requires, the term "Company" includes Huntsman International and its subsidiaries.

        The Company operates through four principal operating segments: Polyurethanes, Pigments, Base Chemicals and Performance Products. During 2002, the Company realigned its principal operating segments. The most significant change was the split of the former Specialty Chemicals segment into two segments: Polyurethanes and Performance Products. The former Tioxide segment was renamed Pigments, and the former Petrochemicals segment was renamed Base Chemicals.

Interim Financial Statements

        The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company are unaudited. However, in management's opinion, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of results of operations, financial position and cash flows for the periods shown, have been made. Results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of those to be expected for the full year. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes to consolidated financial statements included in the Company's annual report on form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.

2.    SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation

        The consolidated financial statements of the Company include its majority-owned subsidiaries. Intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated.

Use of Estimates

        The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

        For purposes of the statements of cash flows, the Company considers cash in checking accounts and cash in short-term highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash and cash equivalents.

5

Inventories

        Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined using the weighted average cost method.

Plant and Equipment

        Plant and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives or lease term as follows:

        Approximately $440.1 million of plant and equipment is depreciated using the straight-line method on a group basis with depreciation based on a 5% composite rate. When capital assets representing complete groups of property are disposed of, the difference between the disposal proceeds and net book value is recorded to income. When individual assets recorded on the group basis are disposed of, the difference between historical cost and the disposal proceeds is recorded to accumulated depreciation. When individual assets not recorded on the group basis are disposed of, the difference between historical cost and the disposal proceeds is recorded to income.

Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliates

        Investments in companies in which the Company exercises significant influence, generally ownership interests of 20% to 50%, are accounted for using the equity method.

Intangible Assets

        Intangible assets are stated at cost (fair value at the time of acquisition) and are amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives or over the life of the related agreement, ranging from five to fifteen years.

Other Assets

        Other assets consist primarily of spare parts, capitalized loan fees, non-qualified employee benefit assets and turnaround costs. Capitalized loan fees are amortized using the straight-line method over the term of the related debt, ranging from six to ten years.

        Periodic maintenance and repairs applicable to major units of manufacturing facilities are accounted for on the prepaid basis by deferring the costs of the turnaround and expensing the costs over the estimated period until the next turnaround.

Carrying Value of Long-Term Assets

        The Company evaluates the carrying value of long-term assets based upon current and anticipated undiscounted cash flows, and recognizes an impairment when such estimated cash flows will be less than the carrying value of the asset. Measurement of the amount of impairment, if any, is based upon the difference between carrying value and fair value.

Derivatives and Hedging Activities

        Effective January 1, 2001, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." SFAS No. 133 requires that an entity recognize all derivative instruments as assets or liabilities in the balance sheet and measure those instruments at fair value. The accounting for the change in the fair value depends

6

on the use of the instrument. The adoption of SFAS No. 133 resulted in a cumulative increase in net loss of $1.5 million and a cumulative increase to accumulated other comprehensive loss of $1.1 million. See "Note 7—Derivatives and Hedging Activities."

Environmental Expenditures

        Environmental related restoration and remediation costs are recorded as liabilities and expensed when the site restoration and environmental remediation and clean-up obligations are either known or considered probable and the related costs can be reasonably estimated. Other environmental expenditures that are principally maintenance or preventive in nature, are recorded when expended and expensed or capitalized as appropriate.

Income Taxes

        The Company and its U.S. subsidiaries are organized as limited liability companies and limited partnerships. These entities are treated as partnerships for U.S. income tax purposes, and therefore are not subject to U.S. federal tax on their income. Subsidiaries outside the United States are generally taxed on the income generated in the local country.

        The Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial and tax reporting purposes. The Company does not provide for income taxes or benefits on the undistributed earnings of its international subsidiaries as earnings are reinvested and, in the opinion of management, will continue to be reinvested indefinitely.

Other Long-Term Liabilities

        Other long-term liabilities include accrued pension and other post-retirement benefits, environmental reserves, and other liabilities.

Foreign Currency Translation

        Generally, the accounts of the Company's subsidiaries outside the United States consider local currency to be the functional currency. Accordingly, assets and liabilities are translated at rates prevailing at the balance sheet date. Revenues, expenses, gains, and losses are translated at a weighted average rate for the period. Cumulative translation adjustments are recorded to stockholder's equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss. Transaction gains are recorded in the statement of operations and were $23.8 and $5.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

Revenue Recognition

        The Company generates revenue through sales in the open market, raw material conversion agreements and long-term supply contracts. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned, which is generally upon shipment of product in fulfillment of a customer order.

Research and Development

        Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.

Securitization of Accounts Receivable

        In September 2000, SFAS No. 140, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities," was issued. SFAS No. 140 provides consistent standards for distinguishing transfers of financial assets that are sales from those that are secured borrowings. The Company

7

adopted SFAS No. 140 during the year ended December 31, 2001 as required. Adoption of the accounting requirements of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company's statement of operations or financial position.

        The Company securitizes certain trade receivables in connection with a revolving securitization program. The Company retains the servicing rights which are a retained interest in the securitized receivables. Losses are recorded on the sale and depend on the carrying value of the receivables as allocated between the receivables sold and the retained interests and their relative fair value at the date of the transfer. Retained interests are subsequently carried at fair value which is estimated based on the present value of expected cash flows, calculated using management's best estimates of key assumptions including credit losses and discount rates commensurate with the risks involved.

Reclassifications

        Certain 2001 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2002 presentation.

Recent Financial Accounting Standards

        On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets." SFAS No. 142 changes the accounting for goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives from an amortization method to an impairment-only approach. Upon adoption of SFAS No. 142, the Company is required to reassess the useful lives of all acquired intangibles and perform an impairment test on goodwill. In the first quarter of 2002, the Company completed the assessment of useful lives and concluded that no adjustments to the amortization period of intangible assets were necessary.

        The initial adoption of SFAS No. 142 had no impact on the Company's financial statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. The pro forma net income, assuming the change in accounting principle was applied retroactively to January 1, 2001, would not have changed for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 because the Company has no goodwill.

        On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets." This statement establishes a single accounting model for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. The impact of adopting this pronouncement was not material.

        In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations." SFAS No. 143 addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible, long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. This statement requires that the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation be recognized in the period in which it is incurred by capitalizing it as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived assets. As required by SFAS No. 143, the Company will adopt this new accounting standard on January 1, 2003. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of adopting this pronouncement.

        In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated With Exit or Disposal Activities." SFAS No. 146 requires recording costs associated with exit or disposal activities at their fair values when a liability has been incurred. Under previous guidance, certain exit costs were accrued upon management's commitment to an exit plan, which is generally before an actual liability has been incurred. Adoption of this statement is required effective January 1, 2003. The Company has not yet completed its evaluation of the impact of adopting this statement.

8

3.    INVENTORIES

        Inventories as of September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001 consisted of the following (dollars in millions):

4.    PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT

        The cost and accumulated depreciation of property, plant, and equipment are as follows (dollars in millions):

5.    INTANGIBLE ASSETS

        The gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of intangible assets as of September 30, 2002 were as follows (dollars in millions):

        Estimated future amortization expense for intangible assets through December 31, 2006 is as follows (dollars in millions):

9

6.    LONG-TERM DEBT

        Long-term debt outstanding as of September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001 is as follows (dollars in millions):

Senior Notes Offering

        On March 18, 2002, Huntsman International sold $300 million aggregate principal amount of 9.875% Senior Notes due 2009 (the "2002 HI Notes") in a transaction exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933. Huntsman International used approximately $58 million of the net proceeds to repay outstanding indebtedness under the revolving portion of its senior secured credit facilities (the "HI Credit Facilities"). The balance of the net proceeds was used to repay amounts due under the term loan portion of the HI Credit Facilities, eliminating scheduled term loan amortization requirements in 2002 and substantially reducing scheduled term loan amortization requirements in 2003.

Amendment of HI Credit Facilities

        On March 15, 2002, Huntsman International entered into an amendment to the HI Credit Facilities. This amendment, among other things, allowed Huntsman International to (i) issue the 2002 HI Notes, (ii) apply a portion of the proceeds of the offering of the 2002 HI Notes to substantially reduce the amortization payments on the term loan portion of the HI Credit Facilities due in 2002 and 2003, and (iii) temporarily repay outstanding principal amounts under the revolving portion of the HI Credit Facilities. This amendment also adjusted certain financial covenant levels in 2002 and 2003. Additionally, this amendment provides that Huntsman International will not, and will not permit any of its subsidiaries to, amend, modify or terminate any provisions of the 2002 HI Notes.

7.    DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES

        The Company is exposed to market risks, such as changes in interest rates, currency exchange rates and commodity pricing. As a result, the Company enters into transactions from time to time, including derivative instruments, to manage these risks. The overall risk management philosophy of the Company is to manage the downside risks of these activities. Primary goals of the Company's risk management

10

activities include: (1) reducing the impact of fluctuations in variable interest rates and meeting the requirements of certain credit agreements; (2) reducing the short-term impact from certain movements in foreign exchange rates on earnings; (3) reducing the short-term impact of fluctuations in the purchase price of certain feedstocks; and (4) hedging the net investments position in euro functional currency entities.

Interest Rate Hedging

        Through the Company's borrowing activities, it is exposed to interest rate risk. Such risk arises due to the structure of the Company's debt portfolio, including the duration of the portfolio and the mix of fixed and floating interest rates. Actions taken to reduce interest rate risk include managing the mix and rate characteristics of various interest bearing liabilities as well as entering into interest rate swaps, collars and options.

        As of September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, the Company maintained interest rate swaps and collars with a fair value of approximately $14.9 million and $13.4 million, respectively, which have been designated as cash flow hedges of variable rate debt obligations. These amounts are recorded as other current liabilities in the accompanying balance sheet. The effective portion of unrealized losses of approximately $2.4 million and $16.7 million were recorded as a component of other comprehensive loss, with the ineffective portion of approximately $0.9 million and $1.0 million recorded as interest income in the accompanying statements of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The effective portion of the mark-to-market effect is recorded in other comprehensive loss until the underlying interest payments affect earnings.

        Swaps and collars not designated as hedges are also recorded at fair value on the balance sheet and resulted in an increase in interest expense and an increase in other current liabilities of approximately $1.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and an increase in interest expense and other current liabilities of approximately $9.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001.

Foreign Currency Rate Hedging

        The Company enters into foreign currency derivative instruments from time to time to minimize the short-term impact of movements in foreign currency rates. These contracts are not designated as hedges for financial reporting purposes and are recorded at fair value. As of September 30, 2002 and 2001, the fair value of outstanding contracts was immaterial. During the nine months ended September 30, 2002, the Company recognized a gain of $0.1 million from these activities.

Commodity Price Hedging

        Because feedstocks used by the Company are subject to price volatility, the Company from time to time uses commodity futures and swaps to reduce the risk associated with certain of these feedstocks. These instruments are designated as cash flow hedges of future inventory purchases, fair value hedges of inventory currently held and trading activities. The mark-to-market gains and losses of qualifying cash flow hedges are recorded as a component of other comprehensive loss until the underlying transactions are recognized in earnings. The mark-to-market gains and losses of non-qualifying, excluded and ineffective portions of hedges are recorded in cost of goods sold in the accompanying statements of operations. For the nine months ended September 30, 2002, the Company's gain on derivatives qualifying as cash flow hedges was immaterial. The fair value of all commodity derivatives included as other current assets was $0.1 million as of September 30, 2002. The fair value of commodity derivatives included in other current liabilities was $0.1 million as of September 30, 2002.

        During the nine months ended September 30, 2002, the Company recorded $3.8 million as an increase in cost of goods sold related to net gains from settled contracts and the change in fair value

11

(unrealized gains and losses) on the contracts that are effective economic hedges of commodity price exposures, but do not meet the SFAS No. 133 definition of hedging instruments. As of September 30, 2002, $0.1 million was included in other current assets and $0.1 in other current liabilities. For the nine months ended September 30, 2001, these activities were not material.

Net Investment Hedging

        The Company hedges its net investment position in euro functional currency entities. To accomplish this, a portion of the Company's debt is euro denominated and designated as a hedge of net investments. Currency effects of these hedges produced net losses of approximately $56.5 million and $2.5 million in other comprehensive loss (foreign currency translation adjustments) for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. As of September 30, 2002 and 2001, there was a cumulative net loss of approximately $7.8 and a cumulative net gain of approximately $43.5 million, respectively.

8.    RESTRUCTURING AND PLANT CLOSING COSTS

        As of December 31, 2001, the Company had a reserve for restructuring costs and plant closing costs of $31.3 million recorded in accrued liabilities. The reserve consisted of $30.5 million for workforce reductions and $0.8 million for other exit costs. During the nine months ended September 30, 2002, the Company made cash payments of approximately $19.0 million in workforce reductions. At September 30, 2002 there was $12.3 million remaining in accrued liabilities consisting of $11.9 million for workforce reductions and $0.4 million for other exit costs.

9.    COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

        The Company has various purchase commitments for materials and supplies entered into in the ordinary course of business. These agreements extend from three to ten years and the purchase price is generally based on market prices subject to certain minimum price provisions.

        The Company is involved in litigation from time to time in the ordinary course of its business. In management's opinion, after consideration of indemnification arrangements, none of such litigation is material to the Company's financial condition or results of operations.

10.  ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS

        The operation of chemical manufacturing plants, the distribution of chemical products and the related production of by-products and wastes, entail risk of adverse environmental effects. The Company is subject to extensive federal, state, local and foreign laws, regulations, rules and ordinances relating to pollution, the protection of the environment and the generation, storage, handling, transportation, treatment, disposal and remediation of hazardous substances and waste materials. In the ordinary course of business, the Company is subject continually to environmental inspections and monitoring by governmental enforcement authorities. The Company may incur substantial costs, including fines, damages and criminal or civil sanctions, or experience interruptions in its operations for actual or alleged violations arising under environmental laws. In addition, production facilities require operating permits that are subject to renewal, modification and, in some circumstances, revocation. Violations of permit requirements can also result in restrictions or prohibitions on plant operations, substantial fines and civil or criminal sanctions. The Company's operations involve the generation, handling, transportation, use and disposal of numerous hazardous substances. Changes in regulations regarding the generation, handling, transportation, use and disposal of hazardous substances could inhibit or interrupt operations and have a material adverse effect on business. From time to time, these operations may result in violations under environmental laws, including spills or other releases of hazardous substances to the environment. In the event of a significant incident, the Company could

12

incur material costs to address and remediate the incident. In addition, following any such incident, the Company may incur higher costs to implement measures to prevent future incidents. Given the nature of the Company's business, there can be no assurance that violations of environmental laws will not result in restrictions imposed on the Company's operating activities, substantial fines, penalties, damages or other costs. In addition, potentially significant expenditures could be necessary in order to comply with existing or future environmental laws.

        The Company has established financial reserves relating to environmental restoration and remediation programs, which the Company believes, are sufficient for known requirements. Liabilities are recorded when site restoration and environmental remediation and clean-up obligations are either known or considered probable and can be reasonably estimated. These liabilities are based upon all available facts, existing technology, past experience and cost-sharing arrangements (as to which, the Company considers the viability of other parties). A total of approximately $26.6 million has been accrued related to environmental matters as of September 30, 2002. The Company does not anticipate that, as a result of compliance with current environmental laws and regulations, any future costs in excess of those that have been accrued by the Company will be material to its results of operations or financial position.

        In connection with its acquisitions, the Company generally has entered into agreements that provide it with indemnification for environmental pollution existing on the date of the applicable acquisition.

        A spill at the Company's North Tees facility was discovered on March 27, 2001. The U.K. Environment Agency ("EA") issued an enforcement notice with respect to the spill on March 30, 2001, following an investigation into an alleged leak of a mixture consisting of approximately 60% benzene into the River Tees, allegedly following a dewatering procedure at the site. The requirements of that notice were complied with, to the satisfaction of the EA, by the end of May 2001. The Company contained the spill and conducted a program to reclaim the material. On August 1, 2002, the Company received a summons issued by the EA charging the Company with three counts of environmental violations in connection with the spill: one count of polluting the river and two counts of violating its environmental authorization. On September 24, 2002, the Company pled guilty in magistrate's court to two of the three counts; the third count was withdrawn. A total fine of £23,000 was imposed.

        The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (the "TCEQ," formerly the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission or TNRCC) has issued certain notices of violation relating to air emissions and wastewater issues at the Port Neches facility and filed an amended administrative petition with respect to certain of these violations on January 12, 2001. The Company met with the TCEQ on several occasions in 2001 and early 2002 and has reached a tentative settlement with the agency on penalties. Under the tentative settlement, a fine of no more than $100,000 would be allocable to the PO/MTBE facility. Although the Company does not anticipate it, it is possible that the terms of an air permit, which the Company has applied for as a result of the settlement, may cause the Company to incur costs related to equipment charges serving this plant and others in the vicinity that could be material.

        On October 6, 2002, a leak of sulphuric acid from two tanks located near the Company's Whitehaven, U.K. plant was discovered. About 342 to 347 tonnes of acid were released onto the ground and into the soil near the tanks. Although the Company took immediate steps to contain the spillage and recover acid, a quantity of acid reached a nearby beach via a geological fault. The Company believes that it does not own the tanks; however, the acid in the tanks was owned by the Company. The EA and the Health and Safety Executive are investigating the incident. Whether charges will be brought or other actions taken by the regulatory authorities is unknown at this time. Although the Company can give no assurances, based on currently available information and the Company's understanding of similar investigations and penalties in the past, management believes that, if any

13

charges are brought or actions taken and the Company is ultimately found to be legally responsible, the probable penalties would not be material to the Company's financial position or results of operations.

        The Company is aware that there is or may be soil or groundwater contamination at some of its facilities resulting from past operations. Based on available information and the indemnification rights (including indemnities provided by Huntsman Specialty Chemicals Corporation ("Huntsman Specialty") and Imperial Chemicals Industries PLC ("ICI") for the facilities that each of them transferred to the Company), the Company believes that the costs to investigate and remediate known contamination will not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows; however, the Company cannot give any assurance that such indemnities will fully cover the costs of investigation and remediation, that the Company will not be required to contribute to such costs or that such costs will not be material.

11.  OPERATING SEGMENT INFORMATION

        The Company derives its revenues, earnings and cash flows from the manufacture and sale of a wide variety of specialty and commodity chemical products. The Company has four reportable operating segments: Polyurethanes, Pigments, Base Chemicals and Performance Products. During 2002 the Company realigned its principal operating segments. The most significant change was the split of the former Specialty Chemicals segment into two segments: Polyurethanes and Performance Products. The former Tioxide segment was renamed Pigments and the former Petrochemicals segment was renamed Base Chemicals.

        The major products of each reportable operating segment are as follows:

        Sales between segments are generally recognized at external market prices. For the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, sales to ICI and its affiliates accounted for approximately 6% and 7%, respectively, of consolidated revenues.

14

        The net sales, segment income and EBITDA for each of the Company's reportable operating segments are as follows (dollars in millions):

(1)

Segment income is defined as operating income excluding unallocated corporate overhead.

(2)

EBITDA is defined as earnings from continuing operations before interest expense, depreciation and amortization and taxes.

(3)

Unallocated administrative and other items includes unallocated corporate overhead, loss on the sale of accounts receivable, foreign exchange gains or losses and other non-operating income (expense).

12.  RECENT EVENTS

Accounts Receivable Securitization Program

        On October 22, 2002, Huntsman International expanded its accounts receivable securitization program by including the receivables of several additional subsidiaries. Upon completion of the expansion, the non-consolidated special purpose entity used in the program issued $60 million in additional commercial paper. Proceeds from the sale of receivables were used to reduce borrowings under the revolving credit portion of the HI Credit Facilities. Subject to the annual seasonality of

15

Huntsman International's accounts receivable, Huntsman International estimates that the total net proceeds from this program may approximate $280 million in the upcoming calendar year. For more information, see "—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Securitization of Accounts Receivable".

Pledge of the Company's Membership Interests

        On November 2, 2000, ICI, Huntsman Specialty, Huntsman International and the Company entered into agreements pursuant to which ICI had an option to transfer to Huntsman Specialty or its permitted designated buyers ICI's 30% membership interest in the Company that is indirectly held by ICI (the "ICI 30% Interest"). Pursuant to these agreements, on October 30, 2001, ICI exercised its put right requiring Huntsman Specialty or its nominee to purchase the ICI 30% Interest. On December 20, 2001, ICI and Huntsman Specialty amended ICI's put option arrangement under these agreements to, among other things, provide that the purchase of the ICI 30% Interest would occur on July 1, 2003, or earlier under certain circumstances, and to provide for certain discounts to the purchase price for the ICI 30% Interest. In addition, in order to secure its obligation to pay the purchase price for the ICI 30% Interest, Huntsman Specialty granted ICI a lien on 30% of the outstanding membership interests in the Company.

        Huntsman Specialty's agreements with ICI have been effectively modified in important respects as a result of an agreement between MatlinPatterson Global Opportunities Partners, L.P. (formerly known as CSFB Global Opportunities Partners, L.P.) ("GOP") and ICI. This agreement provided BNAC, Inc. ("BNAC"), then a GOP subsidiary, with an option to acquire the ICI subsidiary that holds the ICI 30% Interest on or before May 15, 2003 upon the payment of $180 million plus accrued interest from May 15, 2002, and subject to completion of the purchase of the B Notes (as discussed below). Concurrently, BNAC paid ICI $160 million to acquire the Company's senior subordinated reset discount notes due 2009 that were originally issued to ICI (the "B Notes"), subject to certain conditions, including the obligation to make an additional payment of $100 million plus accrued interest to ICI. The B Notes have been pledged to ICI as collateral security for such additional payment.

        Huntsman Company together with its affiliates indirectly owns approximately 61% of the Company. In connection with the restructuring of Huntsman Company, all of the shares in BNAC were contributed to Huntsman Holdings LLC, a new holding entity formed by GOP, the Huntsman family and others ("Huntsman Holdings"). Huntsman Holdings caused BNAC to be merged into HMP. HMP is a wholly- owned subsidiary of Huntsman Holdings and it now owns all the equity of Huntsman Company. As a result of its merger with BNAC, HMP holds the interests formerly held by BNAC in the B Notes and the option to acquire the subsidiary of ICI that holds the ICI 30% Interest. If neither HMP exercises its option nor Huntsman Specialty otherwise satisfies its obligation to ICI with respect to ICI's put right, ICI could foreclose on Huntsman Specialty's pledge. Such a foreclosure by ICI could result in a "change of control" under the HI Credit Facilities, the indentures governing Huntsman International's outstanding senior notes and senior subordinated notes (collectively, the "HI Notes") and the indentures governing the Company's outstanding subordinated debt (the "HIH Notes"). A "change of control" would constitute a default under the HI Credit Facilities. It would also entitle both the holders of the HI Notes and the holders of the HIH Notes to exercise their rights to require the respective company to repurchase these notes from them. Under such circumstances there can be no assurance that the Company or Huntsman International would have sufficient funds to purchase all the notes. If HMP does not pay the additional $100 million purchase price in respect of the B Notes, ICI would have the right to foreclose on the pledge of the B Notes in its favor. While there can be no assurance that HMP will be successful in obtaining the necessary funding to complete the transactions relating to the B Notes and the ICI 30% Interest, HMP is currently in preliminary discussions with financial institutions concerning such funding. For more information, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Recent Events."

16

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

General

        Huntsman International Holdings LLC and its subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company," "our," "us" or "we") derive their revenues, earnings and cash flow from the manufacture and sale of a wide variety of specialty and commodity chemical products. These products are manufactured at facilities located in the Americas, Europe, Africa and Asia and are sold throughout the world. We manage our businesses in four operating segments: Polyurethanes (our polyurethanes and PO business); Base Chemicals (our olefins and aromatics business in the United Kingdom); Pigments (our titanium dioxide business); and Performance Products (our surfactants, ethyleneamines and other performance chemicals business). During 2002, we realigned our principal operating segments. The most significant change was the split of the former Specialty Chemicals segment into two segments: Polyurethanes and Performance Products. The former Tioxide segment was renamed Pigments, and the former Petrochemicals segment was renamed Base Chemicals.

        The profitability of our four principal operating segments is impacted to varying degrees by economic conditions, prices of raw materials, customers' inventory levels, global supply and demand pressures as well as other seasonal and, to a limited extent, cyclical factors. Generally, the global market for our polyurethanes and performance products has grown at rates in excess of global GDP growth, while the demand for our petrochemical and pigments products has historically grown at rates that are approximately equal to global GDP growth.

Recent Events

Accounts Receivable Securitization Program

        On October 22, 2002, Huntsman International expanded its accounts receivable securitization program by including the receivables of several additional subsidiaries. Upon completion of the expansion, the non-consolidated special purpose entity used in the program issued $60 million in additional commercial paper. Proceeds from the sale of receivables were used to reduce borrowings under the revolving credit portion of the HI Credit Facilities. Subject to the annual seasonality of Huntsman International's accounts receivable, Huntsman International estimates that the total net proceeds from this program may approximate $280 million in the upcoming calendar year. For more information, see "—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Securitization of Accounts Receivable" below.

Pledge of the Membership Interests of our Parent Company

        On November 2, 2000, Imperial Chemical Industries PLC ("ICI"), Huntsman Specialty Chemicals Corporation ("Huntsman Specialty"), Huntsman International and our Company entered into agreements pursuant to which ICI had an option to transfer to Huntsman Specialty or its permitted designated buyers ICI's 30% membership interest in our Company that is indirectly held by ICI (the "ICI 30% Interest"). Pursuant to these agreements, on October 30, 2001, ICI exercised its put right requiring Huntsman Specialty or its nominee to purchase the ICI 30% Interest. On December 20, 2001, ICI and Huntsman Specialty amended ICI's put option arrangement under these agreements to, among other things, provide that the purchase of the ICI 30% Interest would occur on July 1, 2003, or earlier under certain circumstances, and to provide for certain discounts to the purchase price for the ICI 30% Interest. The amended option agreement also requires Huntsman Specialty to cause our Company to pay up to $112 million of dividends to its members, subject to certain conditions. These conditions include the receipt of consent from Huntsman International's senior secured lenders and its ability to make restricted payments under the indentures governing its outstanding senior notes and senior subordinated notes (collectively, the "HI Notes"), as well as our outstanding high yield notes (the "HIH Notes"). At September 30, 2002, the terms of the indentures governing the HIH Notes do not permit our Company to make restricted payments. In addition, in order to secure its obligation to pay

17

the purchase price for the ICI 30% Interest, Huntsman Specialty granted ICI a lien on 30% of the outstanding membership interests in our Company.

        Huntsman Specialty's agreements with ICI have been effectively modified in important respects as a result of an agreement between MatlinPatterson Global Opportunities Partners, L.P. (formerly known as CSFB Global Opportunities Partners, L.P.) ("GOP") and ICI. This agreement provided BNAC, Inc. ("BNAC"), then a GOP subsidiary, with an option to acquire the ICI subsidiary that holds the ICI 30% Interest on or before May 15, 2003 upon the payment of $180 million plus accrued interest from May 15, 2002, and subject to completion of the purchase of the B Notes (as discussed below). Concurrently, BNAC paid ICI $160 million to acquire our senior subordinated reset discount notes due 2009 that were originally issued to ICI (the "B Notes"), subject to certain conditions, including the obligation to make an additional payment of $100 million plus accrued interest to ICI. The B Notes have been pledged to ICI as collateral security for such additional payment.

        In connection with the restructuring of Huntsman Company LLC (formerly named Huntsman Corporation, "Huntsman Company") described below, all of the shares in BNAC were contributed to Huntsman Holdings LLC, a new holding entity formed by GOP, the Huntsman family and others ("Huntsman Holdings"). Huntsman Holdings caused BNAC to be merged into HMP Equity Holdings Corporation ("HMP"). HMP is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Huntsman Holdings and it now owns all the equity of Huntsman Company. As a result of its merger with BNAC, HMP holds the interests formerly held by BNAC in the B Notes and the option to acquire the subsidiary of ICI that holds the ICI 30% Interest. If neither HMP exercises its option nor Huntsman Specialty otherwise satisfies its obligation to ICI with respect to ICI's put right, ICI could foreclose on Huntsman Specialty's pledge. Such a foreclosure by ICI could result in a "change of control" under the indentures governing the HI Notes and the HIH Notes and under Huntsman International's senior secured credit facilities (the "HI Credit Facilities"). A "change of control" would constitute a default under the HI Credit Facilities. It would also entitle both the holders of the HI Notes and the holders of the HIH Notes to exercise their rights to require the respective company to repurchase these notes from them. Under such circumstances there can be no assurance that our Company or Huntsman International would have sufficient funds to purchase all the notes. If HMP does not pay the additional $100 million purchase price in respect of the B Notes, ICI would have the right to foreclose on the pledge of the B Notes in its favor. While there can be no assurance that HMP will be successful in obtaining the necessary funding to complete the transactions relating to the B Notes and the ICI 30% Interest, HMP is currently in preliminary discussions with financial institutions concerning such funding.

Restructuring of Huntsman Company

        Huntsman Company, together with its affiliates, indirectly holds approximately 61% of our membership interests. On September 30, 2002, Huntsman Company and its subsidiary, Huntsman Polymers Corporation ("Huntsman Polymers"), completed debt for equity exchanges (the "Restructuring"). Huntsman Company obtained the required consent of all its bank lenders to complete the Restructuring on an out-of-court basis. The Restructuring involved the following:

•

Equity Interest in Huntsman Holdings



•

Members of the Huntsman family who owned equity interests in Huntsman Company and any of its subsidiaries, together with certain affiliated entities that owned such equity interests (collectively, the "Huntsman Family"), contributed all their equity interests in Huntsman Company and its subsidiaries, along with their rights to acquire minority interests in certain Australian subsidiaries, to Huntsman Holdings in exchange for equity interests in Huntsman Holdings. Huntsman Holdings now indirectly owns all the equity of Huntsman Company and the B Notes. The Huntsman Family continues to have operational and board control of Huntsman Company, Huntsman Polymers and our Company.

18

•

GOP and Consolidated Press Holdings Limited ("CPH") exchanged approximately $763 million of principal and accrued interest of the bonds of Huntsman Company and Huntsman Polymers for equity interests in Huntsman Holdings. GOP also exchanged its interest in BNAC for equity interests in Huntsman Holdings. As noted above, BNAC was merged into HMP, and, as a result, HMP succeeded to BNAC's interest in the B Notes and it holds the option to acquire the ICI 30% Interest.




•

Huntsman Company and Huntsman Polymers Bonds



•

Huntsman Company and Huntsman Polymers reinstated the approximately $59 million and $37 million, respectively, in principal amount of their bonds not held by GOP and CPH by paying $5.4 million and $4.7 million, respectively, of accrued interest.



•

Pursuant to previously adopted amendments to the indentures governing the Huntsman Company and Huntsman Polymers bonds, which became effective upon completion of the Restructuring, most of the restrictive covenants in those indentures were eliminated.




•

Huntsman Company's Bank Credit Agreements. Huntsman Company and its bank lenders entered into new and amended credit agreements as follows:



•

A new $275 million revolving credit facility maturing in 2006 that is secured by a first lien on substantially all Huntsman Company's assets and those of its domestic restricted subsidiaries. The revolving credit agreement replaces Huntsman Company's prior $150 million supplemental accounts receivable agreement, is subject to a borrowing base of accounts receivable and inventory and is available for general corporate purposes.



•

A term loan agreement providing facilities of $938 million and $450 million maturing in 2007 which are secured by a second lien on substantially the same assets which secure the revolving credit agreement.



•

The pledge by Huntsman Specialty Chemicals Holdings Corporation, a subsidiary of Huntsman Company, of all the equity of Huntsman Specialty and the execution of a guaranty in favor of Huntsman Company's bank lenders.



•

The pledge by Huntsman Specialty of a 30% membership interest stake that it holds in Huntsman International Holdings and the execution of a guaranty in favor of Huntsman Company's bank lenders.

        As a result of the Restructuring, Huntsman Company has eliminated approximately $763 million of consolidated debt claims and has reduced annual interest expense on such debt claims by approximately $63 million.

19

Results of Operations

Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002 Compared to Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2001 (Unaudited) (Dollars in Millions)

(1)

EBITDA is defined as earnings from continuing operations before interest expense, depreciation and amortization, and taxes. EBITDA is included in this report because it is a basis on which we assess our financial performance and debt service capabilities, and because certain covenants in our borrowing arrangements are tied to similar measures. However, EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or viewed as a substitute for cash flow from operations, net income or other measures of performance as defined by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("U.S. GAAP") or as a measure of a company's profitability or liquidity. We understand that while EBITDA is frequently used by security analysts, lenders and others in their evaluation of companies, EBITDA as used herein is not necessarily comparable to other similarly titled captions of other companies due to potential inconsistencies in the method of calculation.

(2)

For purposes of the covenants in our senior secured credit facilities, loss on sale of accounts receivable related to the securitization program is excluded from the computation of EBITDA.

Three Months Ended September 30, 2002 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2001

        For the three months ended September 30, 2002, we had a net loss of $13.3 million on revenues of $1,195.2 million, compared to a net loss of $28.0 million on revenues of $1,133.4 million for the same period in 2001. The decrease of $14.7 million in net loss was the result of the following items:

•

Revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2002 increased by $61.8 million, or 5%, to $1,195.2 million from $1,133.4 million during the same period in 2001. This increase in revenue

20

resulted from higher sales in the Polyurethanes, Pigments and Performance Products segments which were partially offset by decreased sales in the Base Chemicals segment.

•

Gross profit for the three months ended September 30, 2002 increased by $35.3, or                        25%, to $174.9 million from $139.6 million in the same period in 2001. This increase was mainly the result of lower feedstock prices in 2002 as compared to 2001 and increased volumes in all segments, with the exception of Base Chemicals.



•

Selling, administrative and research and development ("SG&A") costs for the three months ended September 30, 2002 increased by $14.1 million, or 15%, mainly due to lower foreign exchange gains in 2002 and additional costs as a result of higher depreciation charges following the implementation of our SAP software system.



•

Net interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2002 increased by $6.7 million, or 9%, to $85.5 million from $78.8 million for the same period in 2001. The increase was primarily due to additional debt and was partially offset by lower market interest rates in the 2002 period.



•

Income tax benefit increased by $3.1 million to $11.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002 as compared to $7.9 million for the same period in 2001. Our tax obligations are affected by the tax regimes of the jurisdictions in which we operate. Increased tax benefits were due primarily to a change in the mix of income (loss) earned in these various jurisdictions.

21

        The following table sets forth the sales and income for each of our operating segments. Segment income is operating income excluding unallocated corporate overhead.

(1)

Administrative and other includes unallocated corporate overhead, loss on the sale of accounts receivable, foreign exchange gains or losses, other non-operating income (expense) and unallocated depreciation and amortization.

Polyurethanes

        Polyurethanes revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2002 increased by $51.1 million, or 10%, to $545.6 million from $494.5 million for the same period in 2001. Higher revenues were primarily due to higher sales volumes for most products. MDI sales volumes increased by 16%, with the Americas, Europe and Asia increasing by 20%, 6% and 31%, respectively. MDI sales prices remained flat. Polyol sales revenue increased by 11% due to an 11% increase in volumes, while selling prices increased less than 1%. PO sales revenue decreased by 27% due to the conversion of some product sales to tolling arrangements. The economic effect of such tolling arrangements approximates the gross margins that would have been earned through the sale of such products. Excluding sales converted to tolling, PO sales volumes remained relatively flat while prices increased by 11%. MTBE sales revenue increased by 5% as compared to the same period in 2001. MTBE sales volumes were relatively unchanged from the prior year; however, average prices increased by 4% due to increasing gasoline prices.

        Polyurethanes segment income for the three months ended September 30, 2002 increased by $9.6 million, or 19%, to $59.2 million from $49.6 million for the same period in 2001. Increased segment income resulted mainly from increased revenues discussed above. Most Polyurethanes products benefited from lower feedstock prices, with the exception of MDI as benzene prices were higher in the third quarter of 2002 as compared to 2001. SG&A costs for third quarter 2002 increased by 8% as

22

compared to third quarter 2001, mainly due to foreign exchange losses in 2002 as opposed to gains in 2001.

Pigments

        Pigments revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2002 increased by $11.7 million, or 5%, to $232.5 million from $220.8 million for the same period in 2001. Pigments revenues increased due to increased sales volumes, which were partially offset by lower selling prices. Average selling prices decreased by 2%, as compared to the same period of 2001. Prices in Europe increased by 4%, while prices in the United States and Asia decreased by 8% and 7% respectively. Sales volumes increased by 6% in the third quarter of 2002 as compared to the same period in 2001 due to increased sales in the United States and Asia. Sales in the United States and Asia were up 10% and 13%, respectively, while sales in Europe remained flat.

        Pigments segment income for the third quarter 2002 decreased by $6.1 million to $9.7 million from $15.8 million for the third quarter 2001. The decline in segment earnings was mainly due to the lower selling prices, partially offset by higher sales volumes. SG&A costs also increased as a result of higher depreciation charges following the implementation of our SAP software system.

Base Chemicals

        Base Chemicals revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2002 decreased by $3.3 million, or 1%, to $303.6 million from $306.9 million for the same period in 2001. In general, selling prices and sales volumes were each higher in the third quarter of 2002 than in the third quarter of 2001, but the higher prices and volumes were more than offset by decreased revenues resulting from the discontinuance of cumene sales (which occurred in the first quarter of 2002) and reduced byproduct sales. Average selling prices increased significantly for most products, including selling prices for propylene, butadiene, cyclohexane and benzene increasing by 25%, 23%, 49% and 37%, respectively. Selling prices for ethylene and paraxylene decreased by 1% and 14% respectively. Sales volumes of ethylene, butadiene, cyclohexane and paraxylene increased by 2%, 7%, 121% and 21%, respectively. Sales volumes of propylene and benzene decreased by 10% and 14% respectively. During September 2001, our paraxylene plant underwent a turnaround which resulted in a reduction in third quarter 2001 sales. During most of 2001, there was a shortage of hydrogen at Teesside, which resulted in reduced cyclohexane production and increased benzene export sales. This was remedied in January 2002 when an on-purpose hydrogen plant went online at Teesside.

        Base Chemicals segment income for the three months ended September 30, 2002 increased by $23.7 million to $8.4 million from a loss of $15.3 million for the same period in 2001. Segment income was higher mainly due to the increased selling prices and volumes discussed above. Increased revenue was partially offset by a 15% increase in the price of naptha, a primary feedstock, during the third quarter. Underlying margins were higher in this period than in 2001 in both the olefins and aromatics markets. SG&A costs in the third quarter 2002 remained flat as compared to the third quarter of 2001.

Performance Products

        Performance Products revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2002 increased by $7.2 million, or 5%, to $143.3 million from $136.1 million for the same period in 2001. Surfactants revenues increased by 10% due to a 8% increase in volumes and a 2% increase in selling prices. Ethyleneamines revenues increased by 4% with a 7% increase in volumes and a slight increase in selling prices. Revenues from other performance chemicals decreased by 10% as the result of decreased volumes.

        Performance Products segment income for the three months ended September 30, 2002 decreased by $4.5 million to $0.8 million from $5.3 million for the same period in 2001. Increased revenues were

23

more than offset by higher SG&A costs related to Company restructuring and the implementation of regional management organizations.

Unallocated Items

        Unallocated items includes unallocated corporate overhead, loss on the sale of accounts receivable, foreign exchange gains or losses, other non-operating income (expense), unallocated depreciation and amortization, interest and taxes. Unallocated items remained fairly consistent for the three months ended September 30, 2002 as compared to the same period in 2001. Administrative and other expenses increased by $4.4 million mainly due to $4.1 million of foreign currency exchange gains in the three months ended September 30, 2002 versus $7.8 million in gains for the same period in 2001. SG&A expenses remained relatively flat. Net interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2002 increased by $6.7 million, or 9%, to $85.5 million from $78.8 million for the same period in 2001. The increase was primarily due to additional debt but was partially offset by lower market interest rates in the 2002 period. Income tax benefit increased by $3.1 million to a benefit of $11.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002 as compared to a benefit of $7.9 million for the same period in 2001. Our tax obligations are affected by the tax regimes of the jurisdictions in which we operate. Increased tax benefits were due primarily to a change in the mix of income (loss) earned in these various jurisdictions.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2001

        For the nine months ended September 30, 2002, we had a net loss of $37.4 million on revenues of $3,368.1 million, compared to a net loss of $31.9 million on revenues of $3,569.1 million for the same period in 2001. The increase of $5.5 million in net loss was the result of the following items:

•

Revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 decreased by $201.0 million, or 6%, to $3,368.1 million from $3,569.1 million during the same period in 2001. This decrease in revenue resulted from lower sales in the Polyurethanes, Pigments and Base Chemicals segments, which were partially offset by increased sales in the Performance Products segment. Sales in the Performance Products segment benefited from the acquisition of the ethyleneamines business in February 2001 and the surfactants business in April 2001.



•

Gross profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 decreased by $18.2, or 4%, to $458.0 million from $476.2 million in the same period in 2001. This decline was mainly the result of lower average selling prices in our Pigment and Base Chemicals segments as described below. These decreases were partially offset by higher gross profits in the Polyurethanes and Performance Products segments.



•

SG&A costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 increased by $5.5 million, or 2%, primarily as a result of additional costs associated with acquired businesses, and bad debt expenses, partially offset by a $12.7 million decrease in research and development costs resulting from our cost reduction efforts.



•

Net interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 increased by $4.3 million, or 2%, to $236.2 million from $231.9 million for the same period in 2001. The increase was primarily due to additional debt and the impact of adjusting interest rate instruments to fair value in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 133. Increased interest expense was partially offset by lower market interest rates in the 2002 period.



•

Income tax benefits increased by $22.9 million to a $31.2 million tax benefit for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 as compared to a $8.3 million tax benefit for the same period in 2001. Our tax obligations are affected by the tax regimes of the jurisdictions in which we

24

operate. Increased tax benefits were due primarily to a change in the mix of income (loss) earned in these various jurisdictions.

        The following table sets forth the sales and income for each of our operating segments. Segment income is operating income excluding unallocated corporate overhead.

(1)

Administrative and other includes unallocated corporate overhead, loss on the sale of accounts receivable, foreign exchange gains or losses, other non-operating income (expense) and unallocated depreciation and amortization.

Polyurethanes

        Polyurethanes revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 decreased by $51.8 million, or 3%, to $1,557.0 million from $1,608.8 million for the same period in 2001. MDI sales volumes increased by 4%, with volumes in Asia decreasing by 2% while volumes in the Americas and Europe increased by 9% and 2% respectively. Volumes in Asia were lower primarily due to reduced sales under co-producer arrangements. MDI selling prices decreased by 3%, with prices down in all regions except Europe, where prices remained stable. Polyol sales revenues increased by 9%, due to an 11% increase in volumes, partially offset by a decrease in average selling prices. PO sales revenues increased by 7% due to a 6% increase in sales volumes and a 2% increase in sales prices. MTBE sales revenue decreased by 19% from the same period in 2001. MTBE sales volumes were relatively unchanged from the prior year; however, MTBE revenues declined due to a 19% decrease in average selling prices primarily the result of lower gasoline prices during most of the year.

        Polyurethanes segment income for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 increased by $56.0 million, or 41%, to $191.4 million from $135.4 million for the same period in 2001. Increased segment income resulted mainly from increased volumes and lower feedstock prices, which more than offset the decline in selling prices discussed above. SG&A costs remained relatively flat due to a

25

$12.7 million decrease in research and development costs in the 2002 period versus the 2001 period, offset by foreign exchange losses and bad debt expenses in the 2002 period.

Pigments

        Pigments revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 decreased by $10.0 million, or 1%, to $669.2 million from $679.2 million for the same period in 2001. Pigments revenues decreased due to lower selling prices, which were partially offset by higher sales volumes. Average selling prices decreased by 10% as compared to the same period of 2001 due to weak industry conditions which existed during 2001 and early 2002. Average selling prices started to increase near the end of the second quarter 2002 as price increases went into effect. Sales volumes increased by 8% in the first nine months of 2002 as compared to the same period last year, with increased sales in all regions. Sales in the United States, Europe and Asia were up 14%, 4% and 16%, respectively.

        Pigments segment income for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 decreased by $76.1 million to $12.4 million from $88.5 million for the same period in 2001. The decline in segment earnings was mainly due to lower margins resulting from weak industry conditions, offset partially by higher sales volumes discussed above. Direct costs increased in line with increased sales volumes while indirect costs have been higher in the 2002 period as compared to 2001 period. The change in indirect costs is primarily a result of a reduction in finished product inventory in the 2002 period as compared to increases in finished product inventory in the 2001 period. SG&A costs also increased as a result of higher depreciation charges following the implementation of our SAP software system.

Base Chemicals

        Base Chemicals revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 decreased by $237.2 million, or 23%, to $791.3 million from $1,028.5 million for the same period in 2001. Decreased revenues were due to lower selling prices and lower sales volumes. Volumes were lower, in part, as a result of the discontinuance of cumene sales (which occurred in the first quarter of 2002). Average selling prices fell significantly for most products, with selling prices for ethylene, propylene and paraxylene falling by 17%, 7% and 19%, respectively, while selling prices for benzene and cyclohexane increased by 2% and 1% respectively. Sales volumes of ethylene and propylene fell by 6% and 19% respectively. These reductions are mainly due to the impact of the turnaround at our olefins plant during the second quarter of 2002. Sales volumes of paraxylene and cyclohexane increased by 16% and 44% respectively. External sales of benzene decreased by 9% due to increased usage of benzene for cyclohexane production.

        Base Chemicals segment income for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 decreased by $30.9 million to a loss of $29.6 million from a profit of $1.3 million for the same period in 2001. Reduced segment income was mainly the result of lower volumes and selling prices as discussed above. Underlying margins were lower in 2002 as compared to the same period of 2001 for both the olefins and aromatics markets. The negative impact of this situation was compounded by the increased costs incurred to purchase product to cover our turnaround. SG&A costs for the first nine months of 2002 remained relatively unchanged as compared to the first nine months of 2001.

Performance Products

        Performance Products revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 increased by $99.5 million, or 30%, to $426.8 million from $327.3 million for the same period in 2001. The majority of this increase results from $97.7 million of non-comparable sales in the 2002 period from our surfactants business which we acquired in April 2001 and our Ethyleneamines business which we acquired in February 2001. Excluding these non-comparable sales, revenues for surfactants increased by 8% period over period.

26

        Performance Products segment income for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 increased by $0.4 million to $15.3 million from $14.9 million for the same period in 2001. Increased segment income is mainly due to non-comparable income from our surfactants business which we acquired in April 2001 and our ethyleneamines business which we acquired in February 2001. Both businesses benefited from lower raw materials costs in the 2002 period versus the 2001 period.

Unallocated Items

        Unallocated items includes unallocated corporate overhead, loss on the sale of accounts receivable, foreign exchange gains or losses, other non-operating income (expense), unallocated depreciation and amortization, interest and taxes. Unallocated items decreased for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 as compared to the same period in 2001, primarily due to $29.0 million of foreign currency exchange gains in the nine months ended September 30, 2002. SG&A expenses remained relatively flat. Net interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 increased by $4.3 million, or 2%, to $236.2 million from $231.9 million for the same period in 2001. The increase was due to additional debt and was partially offset by lower market interest rates in the 2002 period and a favorable impact from adjusting interest rate instruments to fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 133. Income tax benefits increased by $22.9 million to a benefit of $31.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 as compared to a benefit of $8.3 million for the same period in 2001. Our tax obligations are affected by the tax regimes of the jurisdictions in which we operate. Increased tax benefits were due primarily to a change in the mix of income (loss) earned in these various jurisdictions.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash

        Net cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 was $61.2 million, as compared to $187.5 million for the same period in 2001. The decrease in cash provided was primarily attributable to lower operating income and a larger net investment in net working capital in the 2002 period.

        Net cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 was $139.8 million, as compared to $404.7 million for the same period in 2001. The decrease in cash used in the 2002 period was attributable to expenditures on acquisitions during the 2001 period and lower capital spending in the 2002 period.

        Net cash provided by financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 was $61.3 million, as compared to $216.1 million for the same period in 2001. In March 2002, Huntsman International issued $300 million aggregate principal amount of its 9.875% Senior Notes due 2009 (the "2002 HI Notes"), the proceeds of which were used to pay down $290.4 million of the HI Credit Facilities and to pay $9.6 million of debt issuance costs. Huntsman International used approximately $58 million of the net proceeds to repay outstanding indebtedness under the revolving portion of the HI Credit Facilities. The balance of the net proceeds was used to repay amounts due under the term loan portion of the HI Credit Facilities, eliminating scheduled term loan amortization requirements in 2002 and substantially reducing scheduled term loan amortization requirements in 2003. During the 2001 period, we issued €250 million senior subordinated notes, the proceeds of which were used, together with cash flows from operations and borrowings under the HI Credit Facilities, to fund acquisitions and capital expenditures.

27

Debt

        As of September 30, 2002, we had $130.0 million of outstanding borrowings under the $400 million HI Credit Facilities and we had $59.2 million in cash balances. We also maintain $30 million of short-term, discretionary overdraft facilities, of which $13 million was available on September 30, 2002. We have agreed with our overdraft provider that, effective December 31, 2002, our overdraft facility will be reduced to $20 million as a result of the expansion of our accounts receivable securitization program. See "—Securitization of Accounts Receivable" below.

        As of September 30, 2002, we had outstanding variable rate borrowings of approximately $1.29 billion and €129.7 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2002, the weighted average interest rates of these borrowings was approximately 5.85%. This weighted average rate does not consider the effects of interest rate hedging activities.

        We have guaranteed, on a senior basis, Huntsman International's obligations under the HI Credit Facilities. We have also pledged 100% of Huntsman International's membership interests as collateral under our guaranty of Huntsman International's obligations under the HI Credit Facilities.

        Under our senior discount notes and our senior subordinated reset discount notes, we do not pay interest or principal until maturity on December 31, 2009. The indebtedness of Huntsman International that restricts payments to us will mature prior to the maturity of our indebtedness. We anticipate that we will have the funds to pay the principal and interest of our notes at maturity from Huntsman International's distributions or refinancing of our indebtedness. However, we can make no assurances that the foregoing will occur.

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

        As of September 30, 2002, our obligations under long-term debt, lease agreements, and other contractual commitments are summarized below (dollars in millions):

        We have a revolving loan facility of up to $400 million which matures on June 30, 2005 with no scheduled commitment reductions. We also have a $30 million short-term, discretionary overdraft facility. We have agreed with our overdraft provider that, effective December 31, 2002, our overdraft facility will be reduced to $20 million as a result of the expansion of our accounts receivable securitization program. We have various purchase commitments for materials and supplies entered into in the ordinary course of business. Those commitments extend up to ten years and the purchase price is generally based on market prices subject to certain minimum price provisions.

Restructuring and Plant Closing Costs

        At December 31, 2001, we had a reserve for restructuring costs and plant closing costs of $31.3 million recorded in accrued liabilities. The reserve consisted of $30.5 million for workforce reductions and $0.8 million for other exit costs. During the nine months ended September 30, 2002 we made cash payments of approximately $19.0 million in workforce reductions. At September 30, 2002 there was $12.3 million remaining in accrued liabilities consisting of $11.9 million for workforce reductions and $0.4 million for other exit costs.

28

Securitization of Accounts Receivable

        In order to reduce our cost of financing, on December 21, 2000, we entered into a securitization program arranged by JP Morgan under which certain trade receivables were and will be transferred to a non-consolidated special purpose entity. This entity is not our affiliate. The acquisition of these receivables by the entity was financed through the issuance of commercial paper. We received $175 million in initial proceeds from the securitization transaction which were used to reduce our outstanding indebtedness.

        In June 2001, the special purpose entity issued approximately $165 million in medium term notes due in 2006, replacing the majority of the $175 million commercial paper issued previously. In addition to the medium term notes, as of September 30, 2002, the special purpose entity may issue up to $100 million in commercial paper to fund the purchase of receivables. As of September 30, 2002, the special purpose entity had total assets (consisting of cash and accounts receivable) of approximately $288 million, $174 million of medium term notes, and $25 million of commercial paper outstanding. The weighted average interest rates on the medium term notes and commercial paper was 3.0% and 1.8%, respectively, as of September 30, 2002.

        On October 22, 2002, we completed an expansion of our accounts receivable securitization facility. The commitment to issue commercial paper was increased from $100 million to $125 million, and, upon completion of the program expansion, we issued approximately $60 million in additional commercial paper. Subject to the annual seasonality of our accounts receivable, we estimate that the total net proceeds from the expanded facility may approximate $280 million in the upcoming calendar year. The HI Credit Facilities require a mandatory prepayment on the senior secured debt to the extent that proceeds from the securitization facility exceed $280 million. The $125 million committed commercial paper portion of the facility is subject to annual renewal by the commitment provider.

        During the nine months ended September 30, 2002, we sold approximately $2,214.7 million in receivables and received $2,221.8 million in proceeds. We recorded $4.2 million as a loss on receivables for the nine months ended September 30, 2002.

Capital Expenditures

        Capital expenditures for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 were $134.7 million, a decrease of $64.0 million as compared to the same period in 2001. The decrease was primarily attributable to higher spending levels in 2001 associated with the expansion of our titanium dioxide plants. We expect to spend approximately $200 to $210 million during 2002 on capital projects.

        In connection with our agreements with our Rubicon and Louisiana Pigment joint ventures, we are obligated to fund our proportionate share of capital expenditures. During the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, we invested $2.4 million and $2.2 million, respectively in Rubicon. During the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, we received $6.3 and $5.7 million, respectively, from Louisiana Pigment.

Environmental Matters

General

        Our capital expenditures relating to environmental matters for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 were approximately $20.8 and $24.5 million, respectively. Capital costs relating to environmental matters in 2002 are expected to total approximately $42.0 million. Capital expenditures are planned to comply with national legislation implementing the European Union ("EU") Directive on Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control. Under this directive, the majority of our plants will, over the next few years, be required to obtain governmental authorizations, which will regulate air and water discharges, waste management and other matters relating to the impact of

29

operations on the environment. Under this directive, we will also be required to conduct site assessments to evaluate environmental conditions. Although implementing legislation in most EU member states is not yet in effect, it is likely that additional expenditures may be necessary in some cases to meet the requirements of authorizations under this directive. In particular, we believe that related expenditures to upgrade our wastewater treatment facilities at several sites may be necessary, and the associated costs could be material. Wastewater treatment upgrades unrelated to this initiative also are planned at certain facilities. In addition, we may incur material expenditures, beyond currently anticipated expenditures, in complying with EU Directives, particularly the Directive on Hazardous Waste Incineration and the Seveso II Directive, which governs major accident hazards. It is also possible that additional expenditures to reduce air emissions at two of our U.K. facilities may be material. Capital expenditures relating to environmental matters will be subject to evolving regulatory requirements and will depend on the timing of the promulgation of specific standards which impose requirements on our operations. As a result, capital expenditures beyond those currently anticipated may be required under applicable environmental laws.

Potential Liabilities

        The operation of chemical manufacturing plants, the distribution of chemical products and the related production of by-products and wastes, entail risk of adverse environmental effects. We are subject to extensive federal, state, local and foreign laws, regulations, rules and ordinances relating to pollution, the protection of the environment and the generation, storage, handling, transportation, treatment, disposal and remediation of hazardous substances and waste materials. In the ordinary course of business, we are subject continually to environmental inspections and monitoring by governmental enforcement authorities. We may incur substantial costs, including fines, damages and criminal or civil sanctions, or experience interruptions in its operations for actual or alleged violations arising under any environmental laws. In addition, production facilities require operating permits that are subject to renewal, modification and, in some circumstances, revocation. Violations of permit requirements can also result in restrictions or prohibitions on plant operations, substantial fines and civil or criminal sanctions. Our operations involve the generation, handling, transportation, use and disposal of numerous hazardous substances. Changes in regulations regarding the generation, handling, transportation, use and disposal of hazardous substances could inhibit or interrupt operations and have a material adverse effect on business. From time to time, these operations may result in violations under environmental laws, including spills or other releases of hazardous substances to the environment. In the event of a significant incident, we could incur material costs to address and remediate the incident. In addition, following any such incident, we may incur higher costs to implement measures to prevent future incidents. Given the nature of our business, there can be no assurance that violations of environmental laws will not result in restrictions imposed on our operating activities, substantial fines, penalties, damages or other costs. In addition, potentially significant expenditures could be necessary in order to comply with existing or future environmental laws.

        We have established financial reserves relating to environmental restoration and remediation programs, which we believe, are sufficient for known requirements. Liabilities are recorded when site restoration and environmental remediation and clean-up obligations are either known or considered probable and can be reasonably estimated. These liabilities are based upon all available facts, existing technology, past experience, and cost-sharing arrangements (as to which, we consider the viability of other parties). A total of approximately $26.6 million has been accrued related to environmental matters as of September 30, 2002. We do not anticipate that any future costs, in excess of those that have been accrued, will be material to the results of operations or financial position as a result of compliance with current environmental laws and regulations.

        In connection with our acquisitions, we generally have entered into agreements that provide us with indemnification for environmental pollution existing on the date of the applicable acquisition.

30

        A spill at our North Tees facility was discovered on March 27, 2001. The U.K. Environment Agency ("EA") issued an enforcement notice with respect to the spill on March 30, 2001, following an investigation into an alleged leak of a mixture consisting of approximately 60% benzene into the River Tees, allegedly following a dewatering procedure at the site. The requirements of that notice were complied with, to the satisfaction of the EA, by the end of May 2001. We contained the spill and conducted a program to reclaim the material. On August 1, 2002, we received a summons issued by the EA charging us with three counts of environmental violations in connection with the spill: one count of polluting the river and two counts of violating our environmental authorization. On September 24, 2002, the Company pled guilty in magistrate's court to two of the three counts; the third count was withdrawn. A total fine of £23,000 was imposed.

        The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (the "TCEQ," formerly the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission or TNRCC) has issued certain notices of violation relating to air emissions and wastewater issues at the Port Neches facility, and filed an amended administrative petition with respect to certain of these violations on January 12, 2001. We met with the TCEQ on several occasions in 2001 and early 2002 and have reached a tentative settlement with the agency on penalties. Under the tentative settlement, a fine of no more than $100,000 would be allocable to the PO/MTBE facility. Although we do not anticipate it, it is possible that the terms of an air permit, which we have applied for as a result of the settlement, may cause us to incur costs related to equipment charges serving this plant and others in the vicinity that could be material.

        On October 6, 2002, a leak of sulphuric acid from two tanks located near the Company's Whitehaven, U.K. plant was discovered. About 342 to 347 tonnes of acid were released onto the ground and into the soil near the tanks. Although we took immediate steps to contain the spillage and recover acid, a quantity of acid reached a nearby beach via a geological fault. We believe the tanks were not owned by our Company; however, we did own the acid in the tanks. The EA and the Health and Safety Executive are investigating the incident. Whether charges will be brought or other actions taken by the regulatory authorities is unknown at this time. Although we can give no assurances, based on currently available information and our understanding of similar investigations and penalties in the past, we believe that, if any charges are brought or actions taken and our Company is ultimately found to be legally responsible, the probable penalties would not be material to our financial position or results of operations.

        We are aware that there is or may be soil or groundwater contamination at some of our facilities resulting from past operations. Based on available information and the indemnification rights (including indemnities provided by Huntsman Specialty and ICI for the facilities that each of them transferred to us), we believe that the costs to investigate and remediate known contamination will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows; however, we cannot give any assurance that such indemnities will fully cover the costs of investigation and remediation, that we will not be required to contribute to such costs or that such costs will not be material.

MTBE Developments

        In a California case decided on April 16, 2002, three oil companies were found by a jury to be responsible for polluting South Lake Tahoe groundwater with the gasoline additive MTBE, a product which is produced by a number of companies, including our Company. In one finding in that case, MTBE was deemed to be defective under California law because its potential effects on water quality had been withheld. Findings of this kind could encourage similar claims or findings and may result in an adverse effect on the market for MTBE in the United States and elsewhere. We are not a defendant in any pending MTBE case, and our management believes that we would have strong defenses in the event such a case were brought against us. However, there can be no certainty as to the outcome of any such litigation.

31

        Also in April 2002, the United States Senate passed a bill that would ban in four years the use of MTBE in gasoline in the United States. To date, no similar legislation has been passed by the House of Representatives. The Senate bill in its present form is controversial, both on matters related to MTBE and with respect to other energy policies. Whether this bill in its present or a similar form will become law is unknown at this time.

Recent Financial Accounting Standards

        In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations." SFAS No. 143 addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible, long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. This statement requires that the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation be recognized in the period in which it is incurred by capitalizing it as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived assets. As required by SFAS No. 143, the Company will adopt this new accounting standard on January 1, 2003. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of adopting this pronouncement.

        In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated With Exit or Disposal Activities." SFAS No. 146 requires recording costs associated with exit or disposal activities at their fair values when a liability has been incurred. Under previous guidance, certain exit costs were accrued upon management's commitment to an exit plan, which is generally before an actual liability has been incurred. Adoption of this statement is required effective January 1, 2003. We have not yet completed our evaluation of the impact of adopting this statement.

Changes in Financial Condition

        The following information summarizes our working capital position as of September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001 (dollars in millions):