Back to GetFilings.com

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002

Commission File Number 0-25346

TRANSACTION SYSTEMS ARCHITECTS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes ý    No o

        The number of shares of the issuer's Class A Common Stock, par value $.005 per share, outstanding as of August 12, 2002 was 35,410,720 (excluding 1,476,145 shares held as Treasury Stock, and including 426,434 Exchangeable Shares of TSA Exchangeco Limited which can be exchanged on a one-for-one basis for shares of the issuer's Class A Common Stock and 12,166 options to purchase shares of the issuer's Class A Common Stock at an exercise price of one cent per share issued to MessagingDirect Ltd. shareholders).

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Other Information

        On June 5, 2002, Transaction Systems Architects, Inc. (the "Company") filed a Form 8-K, reporting the termination of its relationship with Arthur Andersen LLP as its independent public accountants, and announced the appointment of KPMG LLP as its new independent accountants.

        Information has recently been brought to the attention of the Company's management that caused management to review several transactions involving one of the Company's customers that occurred during fiscal 1999 and 2000, to determine whether such transactions were accounted for appropriately. The Company promptly retained outside legal counsel to review these transactions and advise the Company. The Company promptly notified KPMG LLP and the Company's Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of this review. The Company believes that, based on its initial review and consultation with its outside advisors, some restatement of prior quarterly periods will be required. As a result, the Company has asked KPMG to re-audit the consolidated financial statements for fiscal years 1999, 2000 and 2001.

        The Company has a series of transactions with the customer that affect the quarterly and annual financial statements of the Company in fiscal 1999, 2000, 2001 and 2002. Those transactions included sales of software licenses to the customer, pre-payments of royalties and payments for distributions rights related to the use and resale of the customer's software products, and direct equity investments made by the Company in the customer. The Company is determining whether the recognition of revenue occurred in the proper period and whether the recognition of certain revenues and expenses were properly valued.

        In March 1999, the Company sold a software license to the customer under extended payment terms over a 60-month period and recognized revenue of $4.4 million. In June 1999 and subsequent to making an equity investment in the customer, the Company collected a lump-sum payment of $3.9 million in settlement of the net present value of the remaining scheduled license fee payments. The Company also prepaid royalties in the amount of $0.7 million during June 1999 related to the rights to use and distribute the customer's software products. In March 2000, the Company sold a second software license and services for post-contract support (maintenance) to the customer with payment for the fees due in two subsequent equal installments and recognized revenue of $4.2 million. The Company also modified the distribution rights agreement for the sale and use of the customer's products and committed to pay $6.0 million over 5 years.

        In March 2001, the Company and the customer modified the various agreements. The distribution rights agreement was modified such that an exclusivity clause granted to the Company was cancelled, the royalty rate was reduced and the remaining future payments of $4.8 million were cancelled. Additionally, a consulting agreement was cancelled, a service agreement with various guaranteed payments due to the Company was cancelled and other amounts due the Company were consolidated into a note receivable for $0.7 million.

        In June 1999, the Company made a direct equity investment in the customer by investing $6.5 million of cash in exchange for unregistered common stock and warrants to purchase common stock. The price paid for the investment was at current market values for the customer's publicly traded shares. In July 2000, the Company exercised the warrants, acquiring additional shares of the customer's common stock with a direct investment of $5.2 million in the customer. The Company also sold approximately 24% of its holdings of the customer's common stock during June and July for proceeds of $4.0 million and realized net gains of $1.2 million. The price of the customer's common stock declined significantly during late 2000 and declined further in 2001, and the Company recorded non-cash charges to earnings of approximately $8.1 million and $0.9 million in the fiscal quarters ended

2

December 31, 2000 and September 30, 2001, respectively, for the "other than temporary" decline in the market value of its investment in the common stock.

        The Company's management currently believes that based on information it has reviewed as of the date of this Quarterly Report with respect to the transactions currently under review, the aggregate of GAAP pretax income for fiscal years 1999, 2000 and 2001, and the nine-month period ended June 30, 2002, may not be materially different than previously reported; however, the fiscal quarters and years in which such pretax income was previously reported, the financial statement classification of items of revenue and expense, and pro-forma results, may change. The re-audit could also result in changes to other items of income and expense and the application of accounting principles unrelated to the transactions currently under consideration.

        The Company will defer making any restatement of prior period financial statements until the re-audit is completed. The Company may conclude based on the re-audit that (i) a shift of the recognition of certain revenues and/or expenses between fiscal periods is required, or (ii) certain items of income or expenses should not have been recognized as income or expense in the originally filed financial statements which may result in a corresponding increase or decrease in the subsequent non-cash charge to earnings resulting from the write-off of the investment in the common stock of the customer.

        The Company's independent accountants have advised the Company that they will not be in a position to complete their review of the Company's unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and nine-month periods ended June 30, 2002 until the re-audit is completed. As a result, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q have not been reviewed by independent public accountants in accordance with Rule 10-01(d) of Regulation S-X. Upon completion of the re-audit and the review, the Company will, if necessary, amend its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarterly periods and its Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the annual periods that are affected.

3

Item 1. Financial Statements.

4

TRANSACTION SYSTEMS ARCHITECTS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(unaudited and in thousands, except share amounts)

        See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

TRANSACTION SYSTEMS ARCHITECTS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited and in thousands, except per share amounts)

        See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

TRANSACTION SYSTEMS ARCHITECTS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited and in thousands)

        See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

7

TRANSACTION SYSTEMS ARCHITECTS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.    Consolidated Financial Statements

        Transaction Systems Architects, Inc. ("TSA" or the "Company"), a Delaware corporation, develops, markets, installs and supports a broad line of software products and services primarily focused on facilitating electronic payments and electronic commerce. In addition to its own products, the Company distributes, or acts as a sales agent for, software developed by third parties. The products are used principally by financial institutions, retailers and e-payment processors, both in domestic and international markets.

        The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

        The condensed consolidated financial statements at June 30, 2002, and for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, are unaudited and reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and operating results for the interim periods; except as discussed in Other Information disclosed on page 2 of this Form 10-Q. The condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, together with management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2001. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2002 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be achieved for the entire fiscal year ending September 30, 2002.

2.    Revenue Recognition

        The Company generates revenues from licensing software and providing postcontract customer support (maintenance or "PCS") and other professional services. The Company uses written contracts to document the elements and obligations of arrangements with its customers. Arrangements that include the licensing of software typically include PCS and, at times, include other professional services. PCS includes the right to unspecified upgrades on a when-and-if-available basis and ongoing technical support. The other professional services may include training, installation or consulting. The Company also performs professional services for customers under arrangements that do not include the licensing of software.

        Revenues under multiple-element arrangements, which may include several software products or professional services sold together, are allocated to each element based upon the residual method in accordance with American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position ("SOP") 98-9, "Software Revenue Recognition, With Respect to Certain Arrangements." Under the residual method, the fair value of the undelivered elements is deferred and subsequently recognized. The Company has established sufficient vendor specific objective evidence of fair value for PCS and other professional services based upon the price charged when these elements are sold separately. Accordingly, software license fee revenues are recognized under the residual method in arrangements in which the software is licensed with PCS and/or other professional services, and the undelivered elements of the arrangement are not essential to the functionality of the delivered software.

8

        The Company recognizes software license fees upon execution of the signed contract, delivery of the software to the customer, determination that the software license fees are fixed or determinable, and determination that the collection of the software license fees is probable. The software license is typically for a term of up to 60 months and does not include a right of return. The term for the PCS element of a software arrangement is typically for a period shorter than the term of the software license, and can be renewed by the customer over the remaining term of the software license. PCS or maintenance revenues are recognized ratably over the term of the arrangement on a straight-line basis. The other professional services element of a software arrangement is typically accounted for separately as the services are performed for time-and-materials contracts or on a percentage-of-completion basis for fixed-price contracts. In those instances where the services are essential to the functionality of any other element of the arrangement, contract accounting is applied to both the software and services elements of the arrangement.

        The Company follows two methods for pricing its software licenses. Under the first method, the software license is priced based upon the number of transactions processed by the customer ("transaction-based pricing"). Under transaction-based pricing, the customer is allowed to process a contractually predetermined maximum volume of transactions per month for a specified period of time. Once the customer's transaction volume exceeds this maximum volume level, the customer is required to pay additional license fees for each incremental volume level. Under the second method, the software license is priced on a per copy basis and tiered to recognize different performance levels of the customer's processing hardware ("designated-equipment-group pricing"). Under designated- equipment-group pricing, the customer pays a license fee for each copy of the software for a specified period of time.

        Licensees are typically given two payment options. Under the first payment option, the licensee can pay a combination of an Initial License Fee ("ILF"), where the licensee pays a portion of the total software license fees at the beginning of the software license term, and a Monthly License Fee ("MLF"), where the licensee pays the remaining portion of the software license fees over the software license term. In certain arrangements, the customer is contractually committed to making MLF payments for a minimum number of months. If the customer decides to terminate the arrangement prior to paying the minimum MLF payments, the remaining minimum MLF payments become due and payable. Under the second payment option, the Company offers a Paid-Up-Front ("PUF") payment option, whereby the total software license fees are due at the beginning of the software license term. Under either payment option, the Company is not obligated to refund any payments received from the customer. In the combination ILF and MLF payment option, the Company recognizes the ILF portion of the software license fees upon delivery of the software, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria were met. In the PUF payment option, the Company recognizes the total software license fees upon delivery of the software, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria were met.

        In addition to SOP 98-9, the Company accounts for its software arrangements in accordance with SOP 97-2, "Software Revenue Recognition." The primary software revenue recognition criteria outlined in SOP 97-2 include: evidence of an arrangement; delivery; fixed or determinable fees; and collectibility. SOP 97-2 specifies that extended payment terms in a software licensing arrangement may indicate that the software license fees are not deemed to be fixed or determinable. In addition, if payment of a significant portion of the software license fees is not due until more than twelve months after delivery, the software license fees should be presumed not to be fixed or determinable, and thus should be recognized as the payments become due. However, SOP 97-2 specifies that if a company has a standard business practice of using extended payment terms in software licensing arrangements and has a history of successfully collecting the software license fees under the original terms of the software licensing arrangement without making concessions, the company can overcome the presumption that the software license fees are not fixed or determinable. If the presumption is overcome, the company

9

should recognize the software license fees when all other SOP 97-2 revenue recognition criteria are met.

        The Company has concluded that for certain BASE24 and ICE software arrangements where the customer is contractually committed to make MLF payments that extend beyond twelve months, the "fixed or determinable" presumption has been overcome and software license fee revenues should be recognized upon meeting the other SOP 97-2 revenue recognition criteria. In making this determination, the Company considered the characteristics of the software product, the customer purchasing the software, the similarity of the economics of the software arrangements with previous software arrangements and the actual history of successfully collecting under the original terms without providing concessions. The software license fees recognized under these arrangements are referred to as "Recognized-Up-Front MLFs." For all other products, it has been concluded that (1) the Company does not have a standard business practice of using extended payment terms, and/or (2) the Company does not have a long-range history of successful collections for those products.

        The present value of Recognized-Up-Front MLFs recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 totaled approximately $2.8 million and $6.4 million, respectively. The present value of Recognized-Up-Front MLFs recognized during the nine months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 totaled approximately $9.6 million and $18.3 million, respectively. The discount rates used to determine the present value of these software license fees, representing the Company's incremental borrowing rates, ranged from 7.00% to 9.25% during the nine months ended June 30, 2002, and from 9.25% to 11.00% during the nine months ended June 30, 2001. Recognized-Up-Front MLFs that have been recognized as software license fee revenues by the Company, but not yet billed, are reflected in current and long-term accrued receivables in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

3.    Line of Credit Facilities

        During the three months ended June 30, 2002, the Company renewed its bank line of credit agreement with a large United States bank, reducing the available credit amount pursuant to the agreement from $25.0 million to $15.0 million. This credit agreement is secured by certain trade receivables and provides that the Company must satisfy certain specified earnings, working capital and minimum tangible net worth requirements, as defined, and places restrictions on the Company's ability to, among other things, sell assets, incur debt, pay dividends, participate in mergers and make investments or guarantees. The Company also has a line of credit agreement with a large foreign bank in the amount of 3.0 million British Sterling, which translates to approximately $4.6 million as of June 30, 2002. The foreign credit agreement requires the Company to maintain minimum tangible net worth within the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, ACI Worldwide (EMEA) Ltd. The Company is in compliance with all debt covenants as of June 30, 2002.

        Interest on the U.S. credit facility accrues at an annual rate equal to either the bank's prime rate or the LIBOR rate plus 2% and is payable monthly. Interest on the foreign credit facility accrues at an annual rate of 1% above the bank's "base rate." The Company recorded interest expense and related fees of $15,000 and $249,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively, and $180,000 and $1,270,000 during the nine months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively, related to its line of credit facilities. The carrying amounts of the Company's credit facilities approximate fair value due to their variable interest rates. The Company has no line of credit borrowings outstanding as of June 30, 2002. The entire $19.6 million is available to the Company for future borrowings. The U.S. credit facility expires in June 2003 and the foreign credit facility expires in October 2002. The Company plans to renew the foreign line of credit with financial terms similar to those currently in place.

10

4.    Non-Cash and Other Charges

        The Company continually evaluates its investment holdings and long-lived assets for evidence of impairment. After considering current market conditions for technology companies and specific information regarding those companies in which the Company has an ownership interest, the Company determined that the declines in market value for certain of its investment holdings were "other than temporary" and charges to earnings for the declines in market value were required. Therefore, the Company recorded non-cash charges of $2.2 million, $2.9 million, $900,000 and $12.4 million, respectively, during the fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2002, December 31, 2001, September 30, 2001 and December 31, 2000. In addition, the Company expensed costs of $1.9 million associated with the cancelled initial public offering of its wholly-owned subsidiary, Insession Technologies, Inc. in the three months ended December 31, 2000. These items are included in other non operating expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.

        During the third quarter of fiscal 2001, the Company closed or significantly reduced the size of certain product development organizations and geographic sales offices. The Company also made executive management changes and transferred its 70% ownership in Hospital Health Plan Corporation to the minority shareholder. These actions resulted in a charge of $22.0 million during the third quarter of fiscal 2001.

        Charges associated with these actions related to asset impairments, lease obligations, termination benefits and other restructuring charges. Asset impairments related to the write-off of property and equipment in vacated office facilities and other-than-temporary declines in the fair value of certain notes receivables. Lease obligations related to vacated corporate office facilities. Amounts expensed represent estimates of undiscounted future cash outflows, offset by anticipated third-party purchases or sub-leases. Termination benefits were comprised of severance-related payments for all employees terminated in connection with the operational restructuring and the partial forgiveness of a note receivable from an executive officer. Termination benefits do not include any amounts for employment-related services prior to termination. Other restructuring charges included settlement costs and allowance provisions for customers under related contractual obligations.

        At September 30, 2001, the remaining accrued liability associated with the restructuring and other charges described above was $4.0 million and consisted of $1.4 million in lease obligations, $1.5 million in termination benefits and $1.1 million in other restructuring charges. During the first nine months of fiscal 2002, the Company made cash payments of approximately $2.6 million, reducing the liability related to these items to $1.4 million. The Company expects the liability at the end of fiscal 2002 to be approximately $1.0 million, consisting primarily of lease obligations.

        During the three months ended June 30, 2002, the Company determined that the value of certain prepaid distribution rights and notes receivable were impaired. Accordingly, the Company recorded a non-cash charge of $1.6 million for these write-offs. These expenses are included in operating expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.

5.    Gain on Sale of Subsidiary

        On February 14, 2002, the Company sold Regency Systems, Inc. ("Regency"), which sells voice and Internet banking solutions to small and mid-sized banks, to S1 Corporation ("S1"). Under the terms of the transaction, S1 acquired Regency for 400,561 unregistered shares of S1 common stock and $6.0 million in cash ($5.0 million net of expenses associated with the sale). In connection with this transaction, the Company recorded a gain of $4.1 million during the second quarter ended March 31, 2002.

        Under the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement, if the fair value of the S1 common stock received (based on the average closing price for the 10 trading days immediately preceding the effective

11

date of the registration statement for those shares) declined below $5.1 million, or $12.73 per share, then S1 owed the Company the difference between $5.1 million and the fair value. Accordingly, due to the decrease in the fair value of its common stock, S1 paid the Company an additional $478,000 in cash in May 2002, which was recorded as a gain during the third quarter ended June 30, 2002. S1 shares are included in marketable securities and recorded at current market value. S1's share value has declined between the time the Regency transaction closed and June 30, 2002. Due to the short time the Company has owned these shares, the decline in the value of this investment has been treated as temporary, with unrealized losses included in accumulated other comprehensive loss in the stockholders' equity section of the financial statements. The Company will continue to evaluate its holding in S1 common stock for evidence of "other than temporary" impairment. If the Company determines that there is an impairment which is deemed to be "other than temporary", the Company will be required to record a non-cash charge for this impairment. The difference between the value of the S1 shares at the time of the acquisition and the fair market value as of August 9, 2002 is approximately $3.6 million.

6.    Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

        In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB") released Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," which established new accounting and reporting requirements for goodwill and other intangible assets (with indefinite lives) acquired in business combinations. Upon adoption of SFAS No. 142, goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives will continue to be recognized as assets, but will not be amortized as previously required by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 17, "Intangible Assets."

        SFAS No. 142 requires that goodwill be tested for impairment at the reporting unit level at the time of adoption and at least annually thereafter, utilizing a two-step methodology. The initial step requires the Company to determine the fair value of each reporting unit and compare it to the carrying value, including goodwill, of such unit. If the fair value exceeds the carrying value, no impairment loss would be recognized. However, if the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the goodwill of this unit may be impaired. The amount of impairment, if any, would then be measured in the second step.

        Effective October 1, 2001, the Company adopted SFAS No. 142 and hired an independent consultant to perform valuations of the Company's reporting units that contain goodwill. Completion of the initial step of testing indicated that the carrying value of one reporting unit exceeded its estimated fair value. Fair value was determined using a discounted cash flow methodology. Thereafter, given the indication of a potential impairment, the independent consultant completed step two of the test. Based on that analysis, an impairment loss of $25.7 million (net of income tax benefit of $6.2 million), or $0.73 per basic and diluted share, was recognized during the first quarter of fiscal 2002 as a cumulative effect of accounting change. The impairment within this reporting unit resulted primarily from overall softness in discretionary information technology spending and slower than expected adoption of secure document delivery technology.

        Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill attributable to each reportable operating segment with goodwill balances for the first nine months of fiscal 2002 are as follows (in thousands):

12

        In connection with adopting SFAS No. 142, the Company reassessed the useful lives of intangible assets subject to amortization, consisting only of internally-developed software and purchased software, and determined that they continue to be appropriate. Amortization of software is computed using the straight-line method over an estimated useful life of three years. The gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of software at each balance sheet date are as follows (in thousands):

        Software amortization expense recorded in the three and nine months ended June 30, 2002 was $2,262,000 and $9,962,000, respectively. Estimated amortization expense for the remainder of fiscal 2002 and each of the five succeeding fiscal years is as follows (in thousands):

        Actual results of operations for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2002, and results of operations for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2001, shown as if the Company had applied

13

the nonamortization provisions of SFAS No. 142 during that period, are as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):

7.    Common Stock and Earnings Per Share

        Exchangeable shares and options received by shareholders of MessagingDirect Ltd. ("MDL") that have not yet been converted into TSA Class A Common Stock are included in Class A Common Stock for presentation purposes on the September 30, 2001 and June 30, 2002 condensed consolidated balance sheets, and are included in common shares outstanding for earnings per share ("EPS") computations for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001. Exchangeable shares and MDL options included in Class A Common Stock totaled 431,449 shares and 15,317 options as of June 30, 2002, and 650,146 shares and 20,040 options as of September 30, 2001.

        EPS has been computed in accordance with SFAS No. 128, "Earnings Per Share." Basic EPS is calculated by dividing net income available to common stockholders (the numerator) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period (the denominator). Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders, adjusted for the effect of any outstanding dilutive securities (the numerator), by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, adjusted for the dilutive effect of outstanding dilutive securities (the denominator). There is no difference in the numerator used for basic and diluted EPS computations. The differences between the basic and diluted EPS denominators for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2002, which amounted to approximately 380,000 and 273,000 shares, respectively, were due to the dilutive effect of the Company's outstanding stock options using the treasury stock method. Weighted average shares from stock options of 1,471,000 and 1,617,000 were excluded from the computation of diluted EPS for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2002, respectively, because the exercise prices of the stock options were greater than the average market price of the Company's common shares. For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2001, basic and diluted EPS are the same, as any

14

outstanding dilutive securities were antidilutive due to the net loss from continuing operations in both periods.

8.    Comprehensive Income/Loss

        The Company's components of other comprehensive income/loss were as follows (in thousands):

        The Company's components of accumulated other comprehensive income/loss at each balance sheet date were as follows (in thousands):

9.    Segment Information

        The Company's products and services are currently organized within three business units: (1) ACI Worldwide, (2) Insession Technologies and (3) IntraNet, Inc. Another business unit, Health Payment Systems, was disbanded in fiscal 2001. ACI Worldwide products represent the Company's largest product line and include its most mature and well-established applications, which are used primarily by financial institutions, retailers and e-payment processors. Its products are used to route and process transactions for automated teller machine networks; process transactions from traditional point of sale devices, wireless devices and the Internet; handle PC and phone banking transactions; control fraud and money laundering; process electronic benefit transfer transactions; authorize checks; establish frequent shopper programs; automate settlement, card management and claims processing; and issue and manage multi-functional applications on smart cards. MDL activities are included in the ACI Worldwide business unit. Insession Technologies products facilitate communication, data movement, monitoring of systems and business process automation across computing systems, involving mainframes, distributed computing networks and the Internet. IntraNet, Inc. products offer high-value payments processing, bulk/recurring payments processing, wire room processing, global messaging, integration payments management and continuous link settlement processing.

        The Company's chief operating decision makers review business unit financial information, presented on a consolidated basis, accompanied by disaggregated information about revenues and operating income (loss) by business unit. The Company does not track assets by business unit. No single customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company's consolidated revenue during the three

15

and nine months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001. The following are revenues and operating income (loss) for these business units for the periods indicated (in thousands):

(1)

In the third quarter of fiscal 2001, the Company transferred its 70 percent ownership in Hospital Health Plan Corporation ("HHPC"), which comprised the majority of its Health Payment Systems business unit, to the minority shareholder. The remaining portion of the Health Payment Systems business unit, consisting of a health and drug claims adjudication facilities management services organization, was integrated into the ACI Worldwide business unit at the beginning of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2001. Prior period segment information has been restated to reflect this change.

        Most of the Company's products are sold and supported through distribution networks covering the geographic regions of the Americas, Europe/Middle East/Africa ("EMEA") and Asia/Pacific. The

16

following are revenues for the periods indicated and long-lived assets at each balance sheet date for these geographic regions (in thousands):

10.  Accounting Pronouncements Issued But Not Yet Effective

        In June 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. The provisions of this statement are effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. Management is still evaluating the impact of this statement on the consolidated financial statement of the Company.

17

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Overview

        Transaction Systems Architects, Inc. ("TSA" or the "Company") develops, markets, installs and supports a broad line of software products and services primarily focused on facilitating electronic payments and electronic commerce. In addition to its own products, the Company distributes, or acts as a sales agent for, software developed by third parties. The products and services are used principally by financial institutions, retailers and e-payment processors, both in domestic and international markets.

Business Segments

        The Company's products and services are currently organized within three business units: (1) ACI Worldwide, (2) Insession Technologies and (3) IntraNet, Inc. Most of the Company's products and services are marketed and supported through distribution networks covering three geographic regions: the Americas, Europe/Middle East/Africa ("EMEA") and Asia/Pacific. Each distribution network has its own sales force and supplements this with reseller and/or distributor networks.

        The following are revenues and operating income (loss) for these business units for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 (in thousands):

(1)

In the third quarter of fiscal 2001, the Company transferred its 70 percent ownership in Hospital Health Plan Corporation ("HHPC"), which comprised the majority of its Health Payment Systems business unit, to the minority shareholder. The remaining portion of the Health Payment Systems business unit, consisting of a health and drug claims adjudication facilities management services organization, was integrated into the ACI Worldwide business unit at the beginning of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2001. Prior period segment information has been restated to reflect this change.

Backlog

        The Company defines recurring revenue backlog to be all monthly license fees, maintenance fees and facilities management fees specified in executed contracts to the extent that the Company contemplates recognition of the related revenue within one year. The Company includes in its

18

non-recurring revenue backlog all fees (other than recurring) specified in executed contracts to the extent that the Company contemplates recognition of the related revenue within one year.

        The following table sets forth the Company's recurring and non-recurring revenue backlog, by business unit, as of June 30, 2002 and 2001 (in thousands):

        There can be no assurance that contracts included in recurring or non-recurring revenue backlog will actually generate the specified revenues or that the actual revenues will be generated within the one-year period.

Results of Operations

        The following table sets forth certain financial data and the percentage of total revenues of the Company for the periods indicated (amounts in thousands):