Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
ý |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 |
|
OR |
|
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to |
Commission File Number 0-1743
The Rouse Company
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
52-0735512 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
10275 Little Patuxent Parkway Columbia, Maryland (Address of principal executive offices) |
21044-3456 (Zip Code) |
Registrant's telephone number, including area code (410) 992-6000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ý No o
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of the issuer's common stock as of August 9, 2002:
Common Stock, $0.01 par value Title of Class |
86,798,042 Number of Shares |
THE ROUSE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2002 and 2001
(Unaudited; in thousands,
except per share data)
|
Three months ended June 30, |
Six months ended June 30, |
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 253,444 | $ | 242,509 | $ | 492,446 | $ | 488,893 | ||||||||
Operating expenses, exclusive of provision for bad debts, depreciation and amortization | 125,968 | 125,455 | 245,257 | 249,092 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense | 60,169 | 56,404 | 114,533 | 115,162 | ||||||||||||
Provision for bad debts | 3,619 | 1,993 | 5,755 | 3,291 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 38,184 | 31,456 | 71,468 | 62,874 | ||||||||||||
Other provisions and losses, net | 1,083 | 451 | 10,894 | 451 | ||||||||||||
Earnings before income taxes, equity in earnings of unconsolidated real estate ventures, net gains (losses) on operating properties, discontinued operations and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | 24,421 | 26,750 | 44,539 | 58,023 | ||||||||||||
Income taxes, primarily deferred | (6,714 | ) | (6,428 | ) | (16,957 | ) | (12,872 | ) | ||||||||
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated real estate ventures | 6,047 | 5,521 | 13,014 | 12,883 | ||||||||||||
Earnings before net gains (losses) on operating properties, discontinued operations and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | 23,754 | 25,843 | 40,596 | 58,034 | ||||||||||||
Net gains (losses) on operating properties | 47,710 | 162 | 48,824 | (239 | ) | |||||||||||
Earnings before discontinued operations and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | 71,464 | 26,005 | 89,420 | 57,795 | ||||||||||||
Discontinued operations | 26,685 | (78 | ) | 23,432 | (197 | ) | ||||||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | | | | (411 | ) | |||||||||||
Net earnings | 98,149 | 25,927 | 112,852 | 57,187 | ||||||||||||
Other items of comprehensive income (loss): | ||||||||||||||||
Minimum pension liability adjustment | (556 | ) | (500 | ) | (889 | ) | (1,000 | ) | ||||||||
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges | (5,488 | ) | (588 | ) | (1,762 | ) | (588 | ) | ||||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 92,105 | $ | 24,839 | $ | 110,201 | $ | 55,599 | ||||||||
Net earnings applicable to common shareholders | $ | 95,111 | $ | 22,889 | $ | 106,776 | $ | 51,111 | ||||||||
Earnings per share of common stock | ||||||||||||||||
Basic: | ||||||||||||||||
Earnings before discontinued operations and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | $ | .79 | $ | .33 | $ | .99 | $ | .75 | ||||||||
Discontinued operations | .31 | | .28 | | ||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | | | | (.01 | ) | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 1.10 | $ | .33 | $ | 1.27 | $ | .74 | ||||||||
Diluted: | ||||||||||||||||
Earnings before discontinued operations and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | $ | .76 | $ | .33 | $ | .97 | $ | .74 | ||||||||
Discontinued operations | .28 | | .27 | | ||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | | | | (.01 | ) | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 1.04 | $ | .33 | $ | 1.24 | $ | .73 | ||||||||
Dividends per share: | ||||||||||||||||
Common stock | $ | .39 | $ | .355 | $ | .78 | $ | .71 | ||||||||
Preferred stock | $ | .75 | $ | .75 | $ | 1.50 | $ | 1.50 | ||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
2
THE ROUSE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001
(In thousands, except share data)
|
June 30, 2002 (Unaudited) |
December 31, 2001 |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Assets: | |||||||||||
Property: | |||||||||||
Operating properties: | |||||||||||
Property and deferred costs of projects | $ | 5,603,147 | $ | 4,484,183 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | 930,091 | 888,615 | |||||||||
4,673,056 | 3,595,568 | ||||||||||
Properties in development | 268,879 | 217,906 | |||||||||
Properties held for sale | 12,684 | | |||||||||
Investment land and land held for development and sale | 307,997 | 284,291 | |||||||||
Total property | 5,262,616 | 4,097,765 | |||||||||
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated real estate ventures | 537,026 | 269,573 | |||||||||
Prepaid expenses, receivables under finance leases and other assets | 364,123 | 371,072 | |||||||||
Accounts and notes receivable | 61,248 | 87,753 | |||||||||
Investments in marketable securities | 23,547 | 22,157 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 30,737 | 32,123 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 6,279,297 | $ | 4,880,443 | |||||||
Liabilities: | |||||||||||
Debt: | |||||||||||
Property debt not carrying a Parent Company guarantee of repayment | $ | 3,230,390 | $ | 2,709,699 | |||||||
Parent Company debt and debt carrying a Parent Company guarantee of repayment: | |||||||||||
Property debt | 127,885 | 69,389 | |||||||||
Other debt | 1,021,765 | 709,732 | |||||||||
1,149,650 | 779,121 | ||||||||||
Total debt | 4,380,040 | 3,488,820 | |||||||||
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities | 603,774 | 599,298 | |||||||||
Company-obligated mandatorily redeemable preferred securities of a trust holding solely Parent Company subordinated debt securities |
136,965 |
136,965 |
|||||||||
Shareholders' equity: |
|||||||||||
Series B Convertible Preferred stock with a liquidation preference of $202,500 | 41 | 41 | |||||||||
Common stock of 1¢ par value per share; 250,000,000 shares authorized; 86,747,385 shares issued in 2002 and 69,354,169 shares issued in 2001 | 867 | 694 | |||||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 1,229,657 | 763,351 | |||||||||
Accumulated deficit | (63,095 | ) | (102,425 | ) | |||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | (8,952 | ) | (6,301 | ) | |||||||
Net shareholders' equity | 1,158,518 | 655,360 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 6,279,297 | $ | 4,880,443 | |||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
3
THE ROUSE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Six Months Ended June 30, 2002 and 2001
(Unaudited, in thousands)
|
2002 |
2001 |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||||
Rents and other revenues received | $ | 390,767 | $ | 370,036 | ||||||
Proceeds from land sales and notes receivable from land sales | 92,554 | 128,789 | ||||||||
Interest received | 5,531 | 3,517 | ||||||||
Operating expenditures | (174,487 | ) | (173,606 | ) | ||||||
Land development expenditures | (59,159 | ) | (61,189 | ) | ||||||
Interest paid | (115,603 | ) | (112,024 | ) | ||||||
Operating distributions from unconsolidated real estate ventures | 14,331 | 21,303 | ||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 153,934 | 176,826 | ||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||||
Expenditures for properties in development | (67,431 | ) | (93,645 | ) | ||||||
Expenditures for improvements to existing properties | (17,938 | ) | (20,776 | ) | ||||||
Expenditures for acquisitions of interests in properties and other assets | (809,074 | ) | | |||||||
Proceeds from dispositions of interests in properties | 132,183 | 4,548 | ||||||||
Distributions from unconsolidated real estate ventures | | 88,260 | ||||||||
Expenditures for investments in unconsolidated ventures | (25,612 | ) | (21,275 | ) | ||||||
Other | 106 | 1,851 | ||||||||
Net cash used by investing activities | (787,766 | ) | (41,037 | ) | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of property debt | 66,581 | 95,184 | ||||||||
Repayments of property debt: | ||||||||||
Scheduled principal payments | (42,868 | ) | (30,218 | ) | ||||||
Other payments | (74,019 | ) | (77,721 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from issuance of other debt | 392,500 | 4,614 | ||||||||
Repayments of other debt | (80,000 | ) | (59,434 | ) | ||||||
Purchases of common stock | (14,901 | ) | (13,035 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock | 456,347 | | ||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | 11,682 | 6,180 | ||||||||
Dividends paid | (73,522 | ) | (54,881 | ) | ||||||
Other | (9,354 | ) | (1,314 | ) | ||||||
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities | 632,446 | (130,625 | ) | |||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | (1,386 | ) | 5,164 | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 32,123 | 14,742 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 30,737 | $ | 19,906 | ||||||
4
Reconciliation of net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||||
Net earnings | $ | 112,852 | $ | 57,187 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 72,297 | 64,593 | ||||||||
Decrease in undistributed earnings of unconsolidated real estate ventures | 1,327 | 8,227 | ||||||||
Net losses (gains) on operating properties | (76,482 | ) | 239 | |||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | | 411 | ||||||||
Participation expense pursuant to Contingent Stock Agreement | 17,449 | 20,011 | ||||||||
Provision for bad debts | 5,895 | 3,503 | ||||||||
Deferred income taxes | 12,626 | 11,125 | ||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities and other, net | 7,970 | 11,530 | ||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 153,934 | $ | 176,826 | ||||||
Schedule of noncash investing and financing activities: | ||||||||||
Common stock issued pursuant to Contingent Stock Agreement | $ | 12,948 | $ | 20,903 | ||||||
Lapses of restrictions on common stock awards | 403 | 2,545 | ||||||||
Debt assumed by purchasers of land | 7,491 | 19,950 | ||||||||
Debt and other liabilities assumed in acquisition of assets from Rodamco North America N.V. | 662,997 | | ||||||||
Debt assumed in acquisition of other assets | | 80,000 | ||||||||
Common stock issued in acquisition of voting interests in majority financial interest ventures | | 3,500 | ||||||||
Debt and other liabilities assumed in acquisition of majority financial interest ventures | | 547,531 | ||||||||
Property and other assets obtained in acquisition of majority financial interest ventures | | 884,572 | ||||||||
Capital lease obligations incurred | 10,715 | 1,180 | ||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
5
THE ROUSE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2002
(1) Principles of statement presentation
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of The Rouse Company, our subsidiaries and partnerships ("we," "Rouse" or "us") include all adjustments which are necessary, in the opinion of management, to fairly represent our financial position and results of operations. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Except as noted below, the statements have been prepared using the accounting policies described in the 2001 Annual Report to Shareholders.
In October 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets." SFAS No. 144 supersedes SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of," and APB Opinion No. 30, "Reporting the Results of OperationsReporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions." The Statement does not change the fundamental provisions of SFAS No. 121; however, it resolves various implementation issues of SFAS No. 121 and establishes a single accounting model for long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale. It retains the requirement of Opinion No. 30 to report separately discontinued operations, and extends that reporting for all periods presented for a component of an entity that, subsequent to or on January 1, 2002, either has been disposed of (by sale, abandonment, for in distribution to owners) or is classified as held for sale. Additionally, SFAS No. 144 requires that assets and liabilities of components held for sale, if material, be disclosed separately in the balance sheet. We adopted SFAS No. 144 effective January 1, 2002.
Under the provisions of SFAS No. 144, we classified 11 community retail centers in Columbia, Maryland and Tampa Bay Center as properties held for sale in the first quarter of 2002. The 11 community retail centers were sold in April 2002 (see note 7) and we expect to sell Tampa Bay Center during 2002. At June 30, 2002, Tampa Bay Center was encumbered by a mortgage of approximately $17.6 million. We decided to sell these properties as they do not meet the criteria of one of our primary business strategies of owning and operating large-scale premier shopping centers. The operating results of these properties do not materially affect the reported segment results in note 5.
Operating results of properties classified as held for sale in 2002 are included in discontinued operations for all periods presented. Operating results for these properties are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
Three months ended June 30, |
Six months ended June 30, |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 36 | $ | 4,868 | $ | 4,619 | $ | 10,108 | ||||||
Operating expenses, exclusive of depreciation and amortization | 532 | 2,501 | 2,830 | 5,064 | ||||||||||
Interest expense | 365 | 1,381 | 1,297 | 2,784 | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | | 704 | 829 | 1,719 | ||||||||||
Gain on sale of operating properties, net of income taxes | 27,658 | | 27,658 | | ||||||||||
Other provisions and losses | 108 | | 5,244 | | ||||||||||
Income tax benefit (provision), primarily deferred | (4 | ) | (360 | ) | 1,355 | (738 | ) | |||||||
Total | $ | 26,685 | $ | (78 | ) | $ | 23,432 | $ | (197 | ) | ||||
6
In order to conform to general industry practice, we have also reclassified certain building and land improvement costs that are recoverable from tenants from other assets to property. These costs and related accumulated depreciation were $62.0 million and $39.8 million, respectively, at June 30, 2002 and $56.7 million and $35.5 million, respectively, at December 31, 2001. Depreciation of these assets was reclassified from operating expenses to depreciation. Depreciation of these assets was $2.3 million and $4.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively, and $2.0 million and $3.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively.
In April 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 145, "Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections." Upon adoption of SFAS No. 145, we are required to apply the criteria in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30, "Reporting the Results of Operations-Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions," in determining the classification of gains and losses resulting from the early extinguishment of debt.
SFAS No. 145 is effective for us on January 1, 2003 with early adoption of the provisions related to the rescission of SFAS No. 4 encouraged. We adopted the provisions relating to the rescission of SFAS No. 4 on April 1, 2002. Upon adoption, we determined that gains and losses we recognized on early extinguishment of debt were not extraordinary items and accordingly reclassified them as follows (in thousands):
|
Three months ended March 31, 2002 |
Three and six months ended June 30, 2001 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Other provisions and losses | $ | 195 | $ | 451 | |||
Deferred income taxes | (77 | ) | | ||||
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated real estate ventures | | 193 | |||||
Discontinued operations | 3,107 | | |||||
Amount previously reported as extraordinary items | $ | 3,225 | $ | 644 | |||
In addition to the above reclassifications, other amounts for 2001 have been reclassified to conform to our current presentation.
(2) Tax status
We elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (REIT) pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, effective January 1, 1998. We believe that we met the qualifications for REIT status as of June 30, 2002 and intend to meet the qualifications in the future.
A REIT is permitted to own voting stock in taxable REIT subsidiaries ("TRS"). TRS are corporations that are permitted to engage in nonqualifying REIT activities. We own and operate several TRS that are principally engaged in the development and sale of land for residential, commercial and other uses, primarily in and around Columbia, Maryland and Summerlin, Nevada. The TRS also operate and/or own several retail centers and office and other properties. Except with respect to the TRS, management does not believe that we will be liable for significant income taxes at the Federal level or in most of the states in which we operate in 2002 and future years.
In connection with our election to be taxed as a REIT, we have also elected to be subject to the "built-in gain" rules on the assets of our Qualified REIT Subsidiaries ("QRS"). Under these rules,
7
taxes will be payable at the time and to the extent that the net unrealized gains on our assets at the date of conversion to REIT status are recognized in taxable dispositions of such assets in the ten-year period following conversion. Such net unrealized gains were approximately $2.5 billion. We believe that we will not be required to make significant payments of taxes on built-in gains with respect to these assets throughout the ten-year period (which ends in 2008) due to the availability of our net operating loss carryforward and the potential for us to make like-kind exchanges, if necessary. It may be necessary to recognize a liability for such taxes in the future, if our plans and intentions with respect to QRS asset dispositions or the related tax laws change.
(3) Unconsolidated real estate ventures
We own interests in unconsolidated real estate ventures that own and/or develop properties. We use these ventures to limit our risk associated with individual properties and to reduce our capital requirements. These ventures are accounted for using the equity or cost method, as appropriate. At June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, these ventures were primarily partnerships and corporations which own retail centers. Most of these properties are managed by our affiliates.
In May 2002, we acquired partial ownership interests in Oakbrook Center, Water Tower Place and certain other assets from Rodamco North America N.V. ("Rodamco") (see note 11). We report these interests as investments in unconsolidated real estate ventures. Additionally, we acquired from Rodamco the remaining interests in properties (Collin Creek, North Star, Perimeter Mall and Willowbrook) in which we previously owned partial, noncontrolling interests. As a result, these entities are consolidated in our financial statements from the date of acquisition. Prior to this acquisition, these property interests were reported as investments in unconsolidated real estate ventures. The net increase in investments in unconsolidated real estate ventures as a result of the Rodamco transaction is $251.3 million.
(4) Debt
Debt is summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
June 30, 2002 |
December 31, 2001 |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Total |
Due in one year |
Total |
Due in one year |
|||||||||
Mortgages and bonds | $ | 3,297,958 | $ | 198,317 | $ | 2,717,898 | $ | 168,158 | |||||
Medium-term notes | 48,500 | | 51,500 | 3,000 | |||||||||
Credit facility borrowings | 537,500 | 392,500 | 222,000 | | |||||||||
Other loans | 496,082 | 157,184 | 497,422 | 42,774 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 4,380,040 | $ | 748,001 | $ | 3,488,820 | $ | 213,932 | |||||
The amounts due in one year represent the terms of existing loan agreements except where refinancing commitments from outside lenders have been obtained. In these instances, maturities are determined based on the terms of the refinancing commitments. In July 2002, we repaid $41 million of the other loans due in one year.
(5) Segment information
We have five reportable segments: retail centers, office and other properties, community development, commercial development and corporate. The operating measure used to assess operating results for the reportable segments is Net Operating Income ("NOI"). We define NOI as net earnings (computed in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America), excluding cumulative effects of changes in accounting principles, extraordinary items, net
8
gains (losses) on operating properties, certain other provisions and losses, real estate depreciation and amortization, deferred income taxes, certain current income taxes and fixed charges. Fixed charges include interest expense (net of interest income earned on corporate investments), distributions on Company-obligated mandatorily redeemable preferred securities and other subsidiary preferred stock, ground rent expense and certain preference returns to partners. Additionally, discontinued operations, equity in earnings of unconsolidated real estate ventures and minority interests are adjusted to present NOI on the same basis. Effective January 1, 2002, we revised our definition of NOI to exclude ground rents and depreciation attributable to building and land improvement costs that are recoverable from tenants. Accordingly, NOI for prior periods has been presented in conformity with the revised definition.
We use the same accounting policies for our segment reporting as those used to prepare our condensed consolidated financial statements, except that:
These differences affect only the reported revenues and operating expenses of the segments and have no effect on our reported net earnings.
Operating results for the segments are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
Retail Centers |
Office and Other Properties |
Community Development |
Commercial Development |
Corporate |
Total |
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Three months ended June 30, 2002 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues(1) | $ | 180,176 | $ | 50,257 | $ | 46,932 | $ | | $ | | $ | 277,365 | ||||||||
Operating expenses(2) | 74,987 | 19,544 | 31,369 | 3,348 | 3,314 | 132,562 | ||||||||||||||
NOI | $ | 105,189 | $ | 30,713 | $ | 15,563 | $ | (3,348 | ) | $ | (3,314 | ) | $ | 144,803 | ||||||
Three months ended June 30, 2001 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues(1) | $ | 154,605 | $ | 50,425 | $ | 64,904 | $ | | $ | | $ | 269,934 | ||||||||
Operating expenses(2) | 64,183 | 18,809 | 45,861 | 1,075 | 3,116 | 133,044 | ||||||||||||||
NOI | $ | 90,422 | $ | 31,616 | $ | 19,043 | $ | (1,075 | ) | $ | (3,116 | ) | $ | 136,890 | ||||||
Six months ended June 30, 2002 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues(1) | $ | 340,187 | $ | 100,491 | $ | 103,149 | $ | | $ | | $ | 543,827 | ||||||||
Operating expenses(2) | 139,978 | 38,893 | 67,877 | 6,713 | 7,493 | 260,954 | ||||||||||||||
NOI | $ | 200,209 | $ | 61,598 | $ | 35,272 | $ | (6,713 | ) | $ | (7,493 | ) | $ | 282,873 | ||||||
Six months ended June 30, 2001 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues(1) | $ | 307,938 | $ | 101,353 | $ | 133,518 | $ | | $ | | $ | 542,809 | ||||||||
Operating expenses(2) | 127,877 | 37,889 | 87,914 | 2,603 | 6,606 | 262,889 | ||||||||||||||
NOI | $ | 180,061 | $ | 63,464 | $ | 45,604 | $ | (2,603 | ) | $ | (6,606 | ) | $ | 279,920 | ||||||
9
Reconciliations of total revenues and operating expenses reported above to the related amounts in the condensed consolidated financial statements and of NOI reported above to earnings before net gains (losses) on operating properties, discontinued operations and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle in the condensed consolidated financial statements are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
Three months ended June 30, |
Six months ended June 30, |
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||
Total reported above | $ | 277,365 | $ | 269,934 | $ | 543,827 | $ | 542,809 | ||||||||
Corporate interest income | 1,208 | 189 | 2,427 | 513 | ||||||||||||
Our share of revenues of proportionate share ventures | (22,810 | ) | (21,127 | ) | (44,605 | ) | (41,424 | ) | ||||||||
Our share of NOI less fixed charges of other ventures | (2,283 | ) | (2,367 | ) | (5,079 | ) | (4,734 | ) | ||||||||
Revenues of discontinued operations | (36 | ) | (4,868 | ) | (4,619 | ) | (10,108 | ) | ||||||||
Other | | 748 | 495 | 1,837 | ||||||||||||
Total in condensed consolidated financial statements | $ | 253,444 | $ | 242,509 | $ | 492,446 | $ | 488,893 | ||||||||
Operating expenses, exclusive of provision for bad debts, depreciation and amortization: | ||||||||||||||||
Total reported above | $ | 132,562 | $ | 133,044 | $ | 260,954 | $ | 262,889 | ||||||||
Distributions on Company-obligated mandatorily redeemable preferred securities and other subsidiary preferred stock | 3,598 | 3,211 | 6,816 | 6,429 | ||||||||||||
Ground rent expense | 2,037 | 2,274 | 4,184 | 4,474 | ||||||||||||
Our share of operating expenses of proportionate share ventures | (8,528 | ) | (8,147 | ) | (15,631 | ) | (15,697 | ) | ||||||||
Provision for bad debts | (3,619 | ) | (1,993 | ) | (5,755 | ) | (3,291 | ) | ||||||||
Current income tax benefit (provision) | 450 | (1,181 | ) | (2,976 | ) | (2,485 | ) | |||||||||
Operating expenses of discontinued operations | (532 | ) | (2,501 | ) | (2,830 | ) | (5,064 | ) | ||||||||
Other | | 748 | 495 | 1,837 | ||||||||||||
Total in condensed consolidated financial statements | $ | 125,968 | $ | 125,455 | $ | 245,257 | $ | 249,092 | ||||||||
Operating results: | ||||||||||||||||
NOI reported above | $ | 144,803 | $ | 136,890 | $ | 282,873 | $ | 279,920 | ||||||||
Interest expense | (60,169 | ) | (56,404 | ) | (114,533 | ) | (115,162 | ) | ||||||||
Ground rent expense | (2,037 | ) | (2,274 | ) | (4,184 | ) | (4,474 | ) | ||||||||
Our share of fixed charges of proportionate share ventures | (6,177 | ) | (5,913 | ) | (13,862 | ) | (11,051 | ) | ||||||||
Corporate interest income | 1,208 | 189 | 2,427 | 513 | ||||||||||||
Distributions on Company-obligated mandatorily redeemable preferred securities and other subsidiary preferred stock | (3,598 | ) | (3,211 | ) | (6,816 | ) | (6,429 | ) | ||||||||
Other provisions and losses, net | (1,083 | ) | (451 | ) | (10,894 | ) | (451 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | (38,184 | ) | (31,456 | ) | (71,468 | ) | (62,874 | ) | ||||||||
Deferred income tax provision | (7,164 | ) | (5,247 | ) | (13,981 | ) | (10,387 | ) | ||||||||
NOI of discontinued operations | 496 | (2,367 | ) | (1,789 | ) | (5,044 | ) | |||||||||
Our share of depreciation and amortization, other provisions and losses, net, and gains (losses) on operating properties of unconsolidated real estate ventures, net | (4,341 | ) | (3,913 | ) | (7,177 | ) | (6,527 | ) | ||||||||
Earnings before net gains (losses) on operating properties, discontinued operations and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle in condensed consolidated financial statements | $ | 23,754 | $ | 25,843 | $ | 40,596 | $ | 58,034 | ||||||||
10
The assets by segment are as follows (in thousands):
|
June 30, 2002 |
December 31, 2001 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Retail centers | $ | 4,849,007 | $ | 3,457,956 | |||
Office and other properties | 1,072,298 | 1,053,840 | |||||
Community development | 467,231 | 472,226 | |||||
Commercial development | 188,154 | 134,503 | |||||
Corporate | 138,829 | 124,232 | |||||
Total | $ | 6,715,519 | $ | 5,242,757 | |||
Total segment assets exceed total assets reported in the financial statements due to the inclusion of our share of the assets of the proportionate share ventures.
(6) Other provisions and losses, net
Other provisions and losses, net consist of the following (in thousands):
|
Three months ended June 30, |
Six months ended June 30, |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||||||
Impairment of investment in MerchantWired | $ | 10,169 | $ | | $ | 11,623 | $ | | ||||
Net gain on foreign exchange derivatives | (9,296 | ) | | (1,134 | ) | | ||||||
Losses on early extinguishment of debt | 210 | 451 | 405 | 451 | ||||||||
$ | 1,083 | $ | 451 | $ | 10,894 | $ | 451 | |||||
MerchantWired is an unconsolidated joint venture with other real estate companies to provide broadband telecommunication services to tenants. In the second quarter of 2002, we and the other real estate companies decided to discontinue the operations of MerchantWired. Accordingly, we recorded an impairment provision for the entire amount of our net investment in the venture.
A portion of the purchase price for the acquisition of assets from Rodamco (see note 11) was payable in euros. In January 2002, we acquired options to purchase 601 million euros at a weighted-average per euro price of $0.8819. These transactions were executed to reduce our exposure to movements in currency exchange rates between the date of the purchase agreement and the closing date. The contracts were scheduled to expire in May 2002 and had an aggregate cost of $11.3 million. At March 31, the value of these contracts had declined to $3.1 million and we recorded a loss of $8.2 million in the three months then ended. In April 2002, we sold the contracts for net proceeds of $10.2 million and we recorded a gain of $7.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002. For the six months ended June 30, 2002, we recognized a realized loss of $1.1 million. We also executed and subsequently sold a euro forward contract and realized a gain of $2.2 million. As of August 14, 2002, we owned no euros or financial instruments that exposed us to risk of movements of currency exchange rates.
(7) Net gains (losses) on operating properties
The net gains on operating properties for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 related primarily to gains recorded on the sale of our interests in retail centers. In April 2002, we sold our interests in 12 community retail centers for net proceeds of approximately $111 million. We recorded a total gain on this transaction of approximately $32.0 million, net of deferred income taxes of $18.4 million. Our interests in one of the community retail centers were reported in unconsolidated real estate ventures and the gain on the sale of our interests in this property ($4.3 million, net of deferred income taxes of $2.0 million) is included in continuing operations. The remaining gain on this transaction ($27.7 million, net of deferred income taxes of $16.4 million) is classified as a component of discontinued operations (see note 1). In May 2002, we also sold our interest in Franklin Park, a regional retail center in Toledo, Ohio, for $20.2 million and the buyer assumed our share of the center's debt ($44.7 million). Our interest in this property was reported in unconsolidated real estate ventures and, accordingly, the gain of $42.7 million that we recorded on this transaction is included in continuing operations. The cash proceeds from both transactions were used to fund a portion of cash payments required to close the acquisition of assets from Rodamco.
11
Information relating to the calculations of earnings per share (EPS) of common stock for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 is summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
2002 |
2001 |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Basic |
Diluted |
Basic |
Diluted |
||||||||||
Earnings before discontinued operations and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | $ | 71,464 | $ | 71,464 | $ | 26,005 | $ | 26,005 | ||||||
Dividends on unvested common stock awards and other | (230 | ) | (134 | ) | (171 | ) | (129 | ) | ||||||
Dividends on convertible Preferred stock | (3,038 | ) | | (3,038 | ) | (3,038 | ) | |||||||
Interest on convertible property debt | | 456 | | | ||||||||||
Adjusted earnings before discontinued operations and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle used in EPS computation | $ | 68,196 | $ | 71,786 | $ | 22,796 | $ | 22,838 | ||||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding | 85,906 | 85,906 | 68,437 | 68,437 | ||||||||||
Dilutive securities: | ||||||||||||||
Options, unvested common stock awards and other | | 2,123 | | 1,070 | ||||||||||
Convertible Preferred stock | | 5,310 | | | ||||||||||
Convertible property debt | | 1,324 | | | ||||||||||
Adjusted weighted-average shares used in EPS computation | 85,906 | 94,663 | 68,437 | 69,507 | ||||||||||
Effects of potentially dilutive securities are presented only in periods in which they are dilutive.
Information relating to the calculations of earnings per share (EPS) of common stock for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 is summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
2002 |
2001 |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Basic |
Diluted |
Basic |
Diluted |
||||||||||
Earnings before discontinued operations and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | $ | 89,420 | $ | 89,420 | $ | 57,795 | $ | 57,795 | ||||||
Dividends on unvested common stock awards and other | (461 | ) | (293 | ) | (343 | ) | (272 | ) | ||||||
Dividends on Preferred stock | (6,076 | ) | (6,076 | ) | (6,076 | ) | (6,076 | ) | ||||||
Interest on convertible property debt | | 1,011 | | | ||||||||||
Adjusted earnings before discontinued operations and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle used in EPS computation | $ | 82,883 | $ | 84,062 | $ | 51,376 | $ | 51,447 | ||||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding | 83,630 | 83,630 | 68,434 | 68,434 | ||||||||||
Dilutive securities: | ||||||||||||||
Options, unvested common stock awards and other | | 1,784 | | 991 | ||||||||||
Convertible property debt | | 1,400 | | | ||||||||||
Adjusted weighted-average shares used in EPS computation | 83,630 | 86,814 | 68,434 | 69,425 | ||||||||||
Effects of potentially dilutive securities are presented only in periods in which they are dilutive.
12
(9) Commitments and Contingencies
We have guaranteed the repayment of a construction loan of the unconsolidated real estate venture that is developing the Village of Merrick Park. At June 30, 2002, the outstanding balance under this loan was $105.2 million, all of which was guaranteed. The maximum amount that may be borrowed under the loan is $200 million. The amount of the guarantee may be reduced to a minimum of 20% upon the achievement of certain lender requirements. Additionally, venture partners have provided guarantees to us for their share (60%) of the construction loan.
During 2001, we leased land and improvements at Fashion Show to an entity that is developing a portion of the expansion of the retail center. In connection with this lease, we have guaranteed the repayment of construction loan borrowings by the lessee. At June 30, 2002, the outstanding balance under this loan was $80.6 million, all of which was guaranteed. The maximum amount that may be borrowed under the loan is $111 million. An affiliate of Rodamco owned a 99% limited partnership interest in the lessee, and we acquired this interest in connection with the acquisition of the assets of Rodamco described in note 11. A subsidiary of The Rouse Company Incentive Compensation Statutory Trust, an entity that we neither own nor control, owns the controlling interest in the lessee.
We and certain of our subsidiaries are defendants in various litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of business, some of which involve claims for damages that are substantial in amount. Some of these litigation matters are covered by insurance. We are also aware of claims arising from disputes in the ordinary course of business. In our opinion, adequate provision has been made for losses with respect to litigation matters and other claims, where appropriate, and the ultimate resolution of these matters is not likely to have a material effect on our consolidated financial position. Due to our fluctuating net earnings, it is not possible to predict whether the resolution of these matters is likely to have a material effect on our net earnings and it is, therefore, possible that the resolution of these matters could have such an effect in any future quarter or year.
(10) Shelf registration statement
In January and February of 2002, we issued a total of 16.675 million shares of common stock for net proceeds of $456.3 million ($27.40 per share less issuance costs) under our effective shelf registration statement. We used the proceeds of the stock issuance to repay property and other debt and to fund a portion of the purchase price of the acquisition of the assets of Rodamco described in note 11.
At June 30, 2002, an aggregate of $1.4 billion remained available under the shelf registration statement for the future sale (based on the public offering price) of common stock, Preferred stock and debt securities.
(11) Acquisition of assets from Rodamco
In January 2002, we, Simon Property Group, Inc. ("Simon") and Westfield America Trust ("Westfield") announced that affiliates of each (collectively, the "Purchasers") entered into a Purchase Agreement with Rodamco to purchase substantially all of the assets of Rodamco for an aggregate purchase price of approximately 2.48 billion euros, subject to adjustment, and the assumption of substantially all of Rodamco's liabilities. In connection with the Purchase Agreement, affiliates of the Purchasers entered into a Joint Purchase Agreement that specified the assets each would acquire and set forth the basis upon which the portion of the aggregate purchase price to be paid to Rodamco by each Purchaser would be determined. On May 3, 2002, the purchase of the assets of Rodamco closed.
13
The primary assets we acquired are direct or indirect ownership interests in eight regional retail centers, leased primarily to national retailers, which we intend to continue to operate, and are described below:
Property |
Interest Acquired |
Leasable Mall Space |
Department Store Space |
Location |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Collin Creek (1)(2) | 70% | 331,000 | 790,000 | Plano, TX | ||||
Lakeside Mall (1) | 100% | 516,000 | 961,000 | Sterling Heights, MI | ||||
North Star (1)(2) | 96% | 435,000 | 816,000 | San Antonio, TX | ||||
Oakbrook Center (4) | 47% | 842,000 | 1,425,000 | Oakbrook, IL | ||||
Perimeter Mall (1)(2) | 50% | 502,000 | 779,000 | Atlanta, GA | ||||
The Streets at South Point (3) | 94% | 590,000 | 730,000 | Durham, NC | ||||
Water Tower Place (4) | 52% | 310,000 | 510,000 | Chicago, IL | ||||
Willowbrook (1)(2) | 62% | 500,000 | 1,028,000 | Wayne, NJ |
Notes: | |
(1) | As a result of the acquisition, we own 100% interests in these properties. |
(2) | Properties were owned by existing joint ventures or through tenancies in common between Rodamco and us. |
(3) | Property began operations in March 2002. |
(4) | Property also contains significant office space. |
Other primary assets we acquired include a 100% interest in a parcel of land and building at Collin Creek that is leased to Dillard's department store and a 99% noncontrolling limited partnership interest in an entity that is developing a portion of the expansion of Fashion Show, a retail center in Las Vegas, Nevada, on land that is leased from us.
The Purchasers also jointly acquired interests in several other assets, primarily:
Our share of these jointly held assets is approximately 27%. The Purchasers intend to sell the interests in River Ridge, Durham Associates and Sawmill Place Plaza. The operations of MerchantWired will be discontinued, as discussed in note 6. The Purchasers intend to operate Urban Retail Properties Co., solely to manage properties held by others and are currently developing plans to do so. These plans include significant staffing reductions and will likely cause the Purchasers to incur significant severance costs. Our share of these and other costs that may by incurred in order to operate
14
Urban Retail Properties Co. in accordance with the Purchasers' intentions are expected to be in the range of $4 million to $6 million. The Purchasers intend to hold the other jointly held investments.
Our share of the purchase price was approximately $1.59 billion, including our share of debt at properties owned by joint ventures that we account for using the equity method. We paid approximately 605 million euros (approximately $546 million based on exchange rates then in effect) to Rodamco at closing. We also paid approximately $257 million to retire certain obligations of Rodamco and to pay transaction costs. Our share of the debt secured by the operating properties in which we acquired interests is approximately $675 million, including our share of debt of unconsolidated real estate ventures, and our share of subsidiary perpetual preferred stock assumed by the Purchasers is approximately $24 million. In addition, as described below, we acquired a limited partnership interest in an entity developing a portion of the expansion of Fashion Show in Las Vegas, Nevada. Our share of the debt of this entity at the time of acquisition was approximately $72 million which we had previously guaranteed pursuant to the lease agreement described in note 9. The debt secured by the operating properties we acquired or by the Fashion Show expansion does not include debt encumbering properties to be held by the Purchasers jointly, which totals approximately $14 million. Our share of the purchase price, which is subject to adjustment, was based on the allocated prices of the properties that we acquired, directly or indirectly, our share of the properties we own jointly with Simon and Westfield and our proportionate share of Rodamco's debt and the transaction expenses for the acquisition. The aggregate purchase price was determined as a result of negotiations between Rodamco and the Purchasers; our portion of the aggregate purchase price was determined as a result of negotiations among the Purchasers. We have incurred additional transaction costs of approximately $14 million in connection with the acquisition and expect to pay additional transaction costs as acquired assets are sold, as discussed above.
Funds for payment of our portion of the purchase price were provided as follows (in millions):
Sale of Columbia community retail centers | $ | 111 | |
Sale of interest in Franklin Park | 20 | ||
Borrowings on bridge loan facility | 393 | ||
Issuance of common stock in January/February 2002 | 279 | ||
Cash required at closing | $ | 803 | |
In connection with the purchase, we borrowed $393 million on a bridge loan facility provided by Banc of America Securities, LLC and Banc of America Mortgage Capital Corporation. The bridge loan facility provides for no additional availability and has an initial maturity of six months from the closing of the acquisition. We have the right to extend the maturity on $320 million of the borrowings for an additional six months and on $250 million for another six months. We believe we will have sufficient liquidity to repay the borrowings under the bridge loan facility before its extended maturity. We are required to use any proceeds from the sales of interests in operating properties, most property financings and/or issuances of corporate debt or equity securities to repay borrowings under the bridge loan facility.
The remaining net proceeds of $177 million from the issuance of common stock in January and February 2002 were used primarily to repay property debt secured by the Columbia community centers and to reduce credit facility borrowings.
15
The effect of the acquisition on our condensed consolidated balance sheet is summarized as follows (in thousands):
Property and deferred costs of projects | $ | 1,174,743 | |||
Properties in development | 2,059 | ||||
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated real estate ventures | 251,323 | ||||
Prepaid expenses, receivables under finance leases and other assets | 36,807 | ||||
Accounts and notes receivable | 774 | ||||
Debt | (655,264 | ) | |||
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities | (7,733 | ) | |||
Cash requirement | $ | 802,709 | |||
In August 2002, we paid approximately $6.4 million to the other Purchasers as an adjustment to the allocation of the purchase price.
The condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 include revenues and costs and expenses of assets acquired from Rodamco from the date of acquisition. We prepared pro forma consolidated results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, assuming the acquisition of assets from Rodamco and the sale of assets used to fund a portion of the cash requirement of the acquisition occurred on January 1, 2001. The net gains related to the sale of assets are excluded from the pro forma results. The pro forma results are summarized as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
|
2002 |
2001 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenues | $ | 544,463 | $ | 559,635 | |||||
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated real estate ventures | 12,679 | 12,203 | |||||||
Earnings before net gains (losses) on operating properties, discontinued operations and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | 50,488 | 72,161 | |||||||
Net earnings |
$ |
50,320 |
$ |
70,245 |
|||||
Earnings per share of common stock: |
|||||||||
Basic: | |||||||||
Earnings before discontinued operations and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | $ | .54 | $ | .83 | |||||
Discontinued operations | (.02 | ) | (.01 | ) | |||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | | (.01 | ) | ||||||
Net earnings |
$ |
..52 |
$ |
..81 |
|||||
Diluted: |
|||||||||
Earnings before discontinued operations and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | $ | .53 | $ | .82 | |||||
Discontinued operations | (.02 | ) | (.01 | ) | |||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | | (.01 | ) | ||||||
Net earnings |
$ |
..51 |
$ |
..80 |
|||||
The pro forma revenues, equity in earnings of unconsolidated real estate ventures and earnings summarized above are not necessarily indicative of the results that would have occurred if the acquisition and sales had been consummated at January 1, 2001 or of future results of operations.
16
Item 2: Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations:
THE ROUSE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
The following discussion and analysis covers any material changes in our financial condition since December 31, 2001 and any material changes in our results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 as compared to the same periods in 2001. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our 2001 Annual Report to Shareholders.
General:
Through our subsidiaries and affiliates, we acquire, develop and manage a diversified portfolio of retail centers, office and industrial buildings and mixed-use and other properties located throughout the United States. We also develop and sell land for residential, commercial and other uses, primarily in and around Columbia, Maryland and Summerlin, Nevada.
Our primary business strategies include owning and operating (1) premier propertiesshopping centers and large-scale mixed-use projects in major markets across the United States and (2) geographically concentrated office and industrial buildings, principally complementing our community development activities. In order to execute these strategies, we evaluate opportunities to develop or acquire properties and to expand and/or renovate properties in our portfolio. We plan to continue making substantial investments to expand and/or renovate and develop properties. For example,
We also assess whether particular properties are meeting or have the potential to meet our investment criteria. We have disposed of interests or transferred majority interests in more than 40 retail centers and numerous other properties since 1993 (sometimes using tax-deferred exchanges) and may dispose of selected properties that are not meeting or are not considered to have the potential to continue to meet our investment criteria. We may also dispose of interests in properties for other reasons. In March 2002, we agreed to sell our interests in 12 community retail centers in Columbia for net proceeds of approximately $111 million. The sale closed in April 2002 and we recorded a gain of $32.0 million (net of deferred income taxes) on the transaction ($27.7 million of this net gain is recorded as a component of discontinued operations). In anticipation of this transaction, we repaid $58.1 million of debt secured by these properties in March 2002 and incurred a loss on this repayment of $3.2 million (net of income tax benefits of $2.1 million). Also in April 2002, we sold our interest in Franklin Park, a retail center in Toledo, Ohio, for $20.2 million and the buyer assumed our share of the center's debt ($44.7 million). We recorded a gain of $42.7 million on this transaction. We used the net proceeds of these transactions to fund a portion of acquisition costs of the assets from Rodamco North America N.V. ("Rodamco"). Other disposition decisions and related transactions may cause us to recognize gains or losses that could have material effects on reported net earnings in future quarters or fiscal years, and, taken together with the use of sales proceeds, may have a material effect on our overall consolidated financial position.
We also develop and manage large-scale land development projects, including the communities of Columbia and Emerson in Howard County, Maryland and Summerlin, Nevada. To leverage our experience and provide further growth opportunities, we seek opportunities to acquire new and/or
17
existing land development projects. Net cash flows from community development operations provide an additional source of funding for our other activities.
Acquisition of assets from Rodamco:
In January 2002, we, Simon Property Group, Inc. ("Simon") and Westfield America Trust ("Westfield") announced that affiliates of each (collectively, the "Purchasers") entered into a Purchase Agreement with Rodamco to purchase substantially all of the assets of Rodamco for an aggregate purchase price of approximately 2.48 billion euros, subject to adjustment, and the assumption of substantially all of Rodamco's liabilities. In connection with the Purchase Agreement, affiliates of the Purchasers entered into a Joint Purchase Agreement that specified the assets each would acquire and set forth the basis upon which the portion of the aggregate purchase price to be paid to Rodamco by each Purchaser would be determined. On May 3, 2002, the purchase of the assets of Rodamco closed.
The primary assets we acquired are direct or indirect ownership interests in eight regional retail centers, leased primarily to national retailers, which we intend to continue to operate, and are described below:
Property |
Interest Acquired |
Leasable Mall Space |
Department Store Space |
Location |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Collin Creek (1)(2) | 70% | 331,000 | 790,000 | Plano, TX | ||||
Lakeside Mall (1) | 100% | 516,000 | 961,000 | Sterling Heights, MI | ||||
North Star (1)(2) | 96% | 435,000 | 816,000 | San Antonio, TX | ||||
Oakbrook Center (4) | 47% | 842,000 | 1,425,000 | Oakbrook, IL | ||||
Perimeter Mall (1)(2) | 50% | 502,000 | 779,000 | Atlanta, GA | ||||
The Streets at South Point (3) | 94% | 590,000 | 730,000 | Durham, NC | ||||
Water Tower Place (4) | 52% | 310,000 | 510,000 | Chicago, IL | ||||
Willowbrook (1)(2) | 62% | 500,000 | 1,028,000 | Wayne, NJ |
Notes: | |
(1) | As a result of the acquisition, we own 100% interests in these properties. |
(2) | Properties were owned by existing joint ventures or through tenancies in common between Rodamco and us. |
(3) | Property began operations in March 2002. |
(4) | Property also contains significant office space. |
Other primary assets we acquired include a 100% interest in a parcel of land and building at Collin Creek that is leased to Dillard's department store and a 99% noncontrolling limited partnership interest in an entity that is developing a portion of the expansion of Fashion Show, a retail center in Las Vegas, Nevada, on land that is leased from us.
The Purchasers also jointly acquired interests in several other assets, primarily:
18
Our share of these jointly held assets is approximately 27%. The Purchasers intend to sell the interests in River Ridge, Durham Associates and Sawmill Place Plaza. The operations of MerchantWired will be discontinued, as discussed below under other operating information. The Purchasers intend to operate Urban Retail Properties Co., solely to manage properties held by others and are currently developing plans to do so. These plans include significant staffing reductions and will likely cause the Purchasers to incur significant severance costs. Our share of these and other costs that may by incurred in order to operate Urban Retail Properties Co. in accordance with the Purchasers' intentions are expected to be in the range of $4 million to $6 million. The Purchasers intend to hold the other jointly held investments.
Our share of the purchase price was approximately $1.59 billion, including our share of debt at properties owned by joint ventures that we account for using the equity method. We paid approximately 605 million euros (approximately $546 million based on exchange rates then in effect) to Rodamco at closing. We also paid approximately $257 million to retire certain obligations of Rodamco and to pay transaction costs. Our share of the debt secured by the operating properties in which we acquired interests is approximately $675 million, including our share of debt of unconsolidated real estate ventures, and our share of subsidiary perpetual preferred stock assumed by the Purchasers is approximately $24 million. In addition, as described below, we acquired a limited partnership interest in an entity developing a portion of the expansion of Fashion Show in Las Vegas, Nevada. Our share of the debt of this entity at the time of acquisition was approximately $72 million which we had previously guaranteed pursuant to the lease agreement described in note 9 to the condensed consolidated financial statements. The debt secured by the operating properties we acquired or by the Fashion Show expansion does not include debt encumbering properties to be held by the Purchasers jointly, which totals approximately $14 million. Our share of the purchase price, which is subject to adjustment, was based on the allocated prices of the properties that we acquired, directly or indirectly, our share of the properties we own jointly with Simon and Westfield and our proportionate share of Rodamco's debt and the transaction expenses for the acquisition. The aggregate purchase price was determined as a result of negotiations between Rodamco and the Purchasers; our portion of the aggregate purchase price was determined as a result of negotiations among the Purchasers. We have incurred additional transaction costs of approximately $14 million in connection with the acquisition and expect to pay additional transaction costs as acquired assets are sold, as discussed above.
Funds for payment of our portion of the purchase price were provided as follows (in millions):
Sale of Columbia community retail centers | $ | 111 | |
Sale of interest in Franklin Park | 20 | ||
Borrowings on bridge loan facility | 393 | ||
Issuance of common stock in January/February 2002 | 279 | ||
Cash required at closing | $ | 803 | |
In connection with the purchase, we borrowed $393 million on a bridge loan facility provided by Banc of America Securities, LLC and Banc of America Mortgage Capital Corporation. The bridge loan facility provides for no additional availability and has an initial maturity of six months from the closing of the acquisition. We have the right to extend the maturity on $320 million of the borrowings for an additional six months and on $250 million for another six months. We believe we will have sufficient liquidity to repay the borrowings under the bridge loan facility before its extended maturity. We are required to use any proceeds from the sales of interests in operating properties, most property
19
financings and/or issuances of corporate debt or equity securities to repay borrowings under the bridge loan facility.
The remaining net proceeds of $177 million from the issuance of common stock in January and February 2002 were used primarily to repay property debt secured by the Columbia community centers and to reduce credit facility borrowings.
The effect of the acquisition on our condensed consolidated balance sheet is summarized as follows (in thousands):
Property and deferred costs of projects | $ | 1,174,743 | |||
Properties in development | 2,059 | ||||
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated real estate ventures | 251,323 | ||||
Prepaid expenses, receivables under finance leases and other assets | 36,807 | ||||
Accounts and notes receivable | 774 | ||||
Debt | (655,264 | ) | |||
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities | (7,733 | ) | |||
Cash requirement | $ | 802,709 | |||
In August 2002, we paid approximately $6.4 million to the other Purchasers as an adjustment to the allocation of the purchase price.
Other Portfolio changes:
We believe that space in high-quality, dominant retail centers in densely populated, affluent areas will continue to be in demand by retailers and that these retail centers are better able to withstand difficult conditions in the overall economy, specifically in the real estate and retail industries. In addition to the 2002 acquisitions and dispositions noted above, there were several other changes to our portfolio in 2001. We completed an expansion of The Mall in Columbia (May 2001) and the development of several new operating properties: Centerpointe Plaza (Summerlin Village CenterSeptember 2001) and two office buildings in Summerlin Town Center (January and February of 2001). We also sold a building in the Hunt Valley Business Center in April 2001.
Operating results:
As indicated in the 2001 Annual Report to Shareholders, the discussion of operating results covers each of our business segments, as management believes that a segment analysis provides the most effective means of understanding the business. It also provides information about other elements of the condensed consolidated statement of operations that are not included in the segment results. You should refer to the condensed consolidated statements of operations and note 5 to the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q when reading this discussion and analysis. We use net operating income ("NOI") to measure and assess operating results for the reportable segments. As discussed in note 5, we define NOI as net earnings (computed in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America), excluding cumulative effects of changes in accounting principles, extraordinary items, net gains (losses) on operating properties, certain other provisions and losses, real estate depreciation and amortization, deferred income taxes, certain current income taxes and fixed charges. Fixed charges include interest expense, net of interest income earned on corporate investments, distributions on Company-obligated mandatorily redeemable preferred securities and other subsidiary preferred stock, ground rent expense and certain preference returns to partners. Additionally, discontinued operations, equity in earnings of certain unconsolidated real estate ventures is adjusted to present NOI on the same basis. Effective January 1, 2002, we revised our definition of NOI to exclude ground rents and depreciation attributable to building and land
20
improvement costs that are recoverable from tenants. Accordingly, NOI for prior periods has been presented in conformity with the revised definition.
As discussed in note 5, we use the same accounting policies for our segment reporting as those used to prepare our condensed consolidated financial statements, except that:
These differences affect only the reported revenues and operating expenses of the segments and have no effect on our reported net earnings. Revenues and operating expenses reported for the segments are reconciled to the related amounts reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements in note 5. The reasons for significant changes in revenues and expenses comprising NOI and other elements of net earnings are discussed below.
Operating PropertiesRetail Centers:
Operating results of retail centers are summarized as follows (in millions):
|
Three months ended June 30, |
Six months ended June 30, |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
|||||||||
Revenues | $ | 180.2 | $ | 154.6 | $ | 340.2 | $ | 307.9 | |||||
Operating expenses, exclusive of ground rents and depreciation and amortization | 75.0 | 64.1 | 140.0 | 127.8 | |||||||||
NOI | $ | 105.2 | $ | 90.5 | $ | 200.2 | $ | 180.1 | |||||
Revenues increased $25.6 million and $32.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 compared to the same periods in 2001. The increases were primarily attributable to the interests in properties acquired from Rodamco ($29.9 million) and higher rents on re-leased space at comparable retail centers, partially offset by the sale of the 12 community retail centers in Columbia, MD ($4.5 million and $4.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively) and Franklin Park ($1.5 million for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2002). The increase in the six months was also attributable to the receipt of a management contract termination payment at Town & Country Center in Miami, Florida ($4.8 million).
Operating expenses increased $10.9 million and $12.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, compared to the same periods in 2001. The increases were primarily attributable to the interests in properties acquired from Rodamco ($10.3 million), partially offset by the sale of the 12 community retail centers in Columbia, MD ($1.4 million for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2002) and Franklin Park ($0.7 million and $0.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively). In the six month period, the increase was also attributable to current Federal and state taxes ($1.3 million) related to the aforementioned management contract termination payment. Town & Country Center was managed by a taxable REIT subsidiary.
We anticipate continued growth in NOI from retail centers in 2002. We expect to benefit from the interests in properties acquired from Rodamco, properties expanded in 2001, the expected opening of the Village of Merrick Park in September 2002 and the expected opening of the first phase of the Fashion Show expansion in November 2002.
21
Operating PropertiesOffice and Other Properties:
Operating results of office and other properties are summarized as follows (in millions):
|
Three months ended June 30, |
Six months ended June 30, |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
|||||||||
Revenues | $ | 50.3 | $ | 50.5 | $ | 100.5 | $ | 101.4 | |||||
Operating expenses, exclusive of ground rents and depreciation and amortization | 19.6 | 18.8 | 38.9 | 37.9 | |||||||||
NOI | $ | 30.7 | $ | 31.7 | $ | 61.6 | $ | 63.5 | |||||
Revenues decreased $0.2 million and $0.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 compared to the same periods in 2001. These decreases were primarily attributable to lower average occupancy levels at comparable properties (88.9% in 2002 versus 92.2% in 2001). These lower occupancy levels are likely to persist for the balance of this year. These decreases were partially offset by the property interests acquired from Rodamco ($1.1 million).
Operating expenses increased $0.8 million and $1.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 compared to the same periods in 2001. These increases were primarily attributable to the property interests acquired from Rodamco ($0.7 million).
Community Development:
Community development relates primarily to the communities of Columbia and Emerson in Howard County, Maryland and Summerlin, Nevada. Generally, revenues and NOI from land sales are affected by such factors as the availability to purchasers of construction and permanent mortgage financing at acceptable interest rates, consumer and business confidence, availability of saleable land
22
for particular uses and our decisions to sell, develop or retain land. Operating results of community development are summarized as follows (in millions):
|
Three months ended June 30, |
Six months ended June 30, |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||||||||
Nevada Operations: | ||||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||
Summerlin | $ | 32.9 | $ | 56.3 | $ | 66.6 | $ | 94.2 | ||||||
Other | 4.1 | 0.2 | 5.5 | 2.0 | ||||||||||
Operating costs and expenses: | ||||||||||||||
Summerlin | 27.0 | 40.9 | 51.8 | 68.0 | ||||||||||
Other | 3.1 | 0.3 | 4.7 | 1.9 | ||||||||||
NOI | $ | 6.9 | $ | 15.3 | $ | 15.6 | $ | 26.3 | ||||||
Columbia and Other: |
||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 9.9 | $ | 8.4 | $ | 31.0 | $ | 37.3 | ||||||
Operating costs and expenses | 1.2 | 4.7 | 11.3 | 18.0 | ||||||||||
NOI | $ | 8.7 | $ | 3.7 | $ | 19.7 | $ | 19.3 | ||||||
Total: |
||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 46.9 | $ | 64.9 | $ | 103.1 | $ | 133.5 | ||||||
Operating costs and expenses | 31.3 | 45.9 | 67.8 | 87.9 | ||||||||||
NOI | $ | 15.6 | $ | 19.0 | $ | 35.3 | $ | 45.6 | ||||||
Revenues from Summerlin decreased $23.4 million and $27.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively, while related costs and expenses decreased $13.9 million and $16.2 million, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2001. The decreases in revenues and operating costs and expenses were primarily attributable to decreases in residential sales. The decreases in residential sales were attributable to a lower supply of saleable land as we continue the development of a new phase in Summerlin, Nevada. We have received strong interest from homebuilders and homebuyers for the new phase and anticipate the full year results of 2002 will surpass the results of 2001.
Revenues from Columbia and other community development operations increased $1.5 million and decreased $6.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively. Costs and expenses related to Columbia and other community operations decreased $3.5 million and $6.7 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2001. The higher profit margins experienced in 2002 were primarily attributable to the sale of certain parcels of land with low development costs and are not expected to continue. The decreases in revenues and related costs and expenses in the six month period were attributable to a lower supply of saleable land as we begin new development in Howard County, Maryland (Emerson). We have received strong interest from homebuilders and homebuyers with respect to this new development.
23
Commercial development expenses consist primarily of preconstruction expenses, new business costs and disposition expenses. Preconstruction and new business costs relate to the costs of evaluating potential projects which may not go forward to completion, acquisition of properties and other business opportunities. Disposition expenses relate to the costs of evaluating and planning for the disposition of properties. Commercial development expenses increased by $2.3 million and $4.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, compared to the same period in 2001. The increase was primarily attributable to internal costs allocated to the Rodamco transaction.
Corporate:
Corporate operating expenses consist of general and administrative costs and our equity in the operating loss of MerchantWired (excluding impairment losses included in other provisions and losses, net), an unconsolidated joint venture with other real estate companies to provide broadband telecommunication services to tenants.
Total corporate expenses increased $0.2 million and $0.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively, compared to the same period in 2001. The increases were attributable primarily to costs incurred in evaluating various corporate structure strategies.
Other operating information:
Interest expense: Interest expense was $60.2 million and $114.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively, and $56.4 million and $115.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively. The increase for the three months ended June 30, 2002 compared to the same period in 2001 was attributable primarily to an increase in the average debt balance as a result of the Rodamco transaction, partially offset by lower average interest rates on variable rate debt.
Depreciation and amortization: Depreciation and amortization expense was $38.2 million and $71.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively, and $31.5 million and $62.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively. The increase was attributable primarily to depreciation on the properties acquired from Rodamco.
Other provisions and losses: The other provisions and losses are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
Three months ended June 30, |
Six months ended June 30, |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||||||
Impairment of investment in MerchantWired | $ | 10,169 | $ | | $ | 11,623 | $ | | ||||
Net gain on foreign exchange derivatives | (9,296 | ) | | (1,134 | ) | | ||||||
Losses on early extinguishment of debt | 210 | 451 | 405 | 451 | ||||||||
$ | 1,083 | $ | 451 | $ | 10,894 | $ | 451 | |||||
In the second quarter of 2002, we and our joint venture partners decided to discontinue the operations of MerchantWired. Accordingly, we recorded an impairment provision for the entire amount of our net investment in the venture.
The cash portion of the purchase price for the acquisition of assets from Rodamco was payable in euros. In January 2002, we acquired options to purchase 601 million euros at a weighted-average per euro price of $0.8819. These transactions were executed to reduce our exposure to movements in currency exchange rates between the date of the purchase agreement and the closing date. The contracts were scheduled to expire in May 2002 and had an aggregate cost of $11.3 million. At
24
March 31, the value of these contracts had declined to $3.1 million and we recorded a loss of $8.2 million in the three months then ended. The contracts were sold in April 2002 for net proceeds of $10.2 million and we recorded a gain of $7.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002. For the six months ended June 30, 2002, we recognized a realized loss of $1.1 million. We also executed and subsequently sold a euro forward contract and realized a gain of $2.2 million on this transaction. As of August 14, 2002, we owned no euros or financial instruments that exposed us to risk of movements of currency exchange rates.
Income taxes: We own and operate several taxable REIT subsidiaries ("TRS"), which allow us to engage in certain nonqualifying REIT activities. With respect to the TRS, we are liable for income taxes at the Federal and state levels, and the current and deferred income tax provisions relate primarily to the earnings of the TRS.
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated real estate ventures: For segment reporting purposes, our share of the NOI of unconsolidated real estate ventures is included in the operating results of retail centers, office and other properties, community development and commercial development as discussed above in this Management's Discussion and Analysis. Equity in earnings of the unconsolidated real estate ventures was $6.0 million and $13.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively, and $5.5 million and $12.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively.
Net gains (losses) on operating properties: Net gains (losses) on operating properties were $47.7 million gain and $48.8 million gain for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively, and $0.2 million gain and ($0.2) million loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively.
The net gains on operating properties for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 related primarily to gains recorded on the sale of our interests in retail centers. In April 2002, we sold our interests in 12 community retail centers in Columbia, Maryland for net proceeds of approximately $111 million. We recorded a total gain on this transaction of $32.0 million, net of deferred income taxes of $18.4 million. Our interests in one of the community retail centers were reported in unconsolidated real estate ventures and the gain on the sale of our interests in this property ($4.3 million, net of deferred income taxes of $2.0 million) is included in continuing operations. The remaining gain on this transaction ($27.7 million, net of deferred income taxes of $16.4 million) is classified as a component of discontinued operations (see below). In May 2002, we also sold our interest in Franklin Park, a regional retail center in Toledo, Ohio, for $20.2 million and the buyer assumed our share of the center's debt ($44.7 million). Our interest in this property was reported in unconsolidated real estate ventures and, accordingly, the gain of $42.7 million that we recorded on this transaction is included in continuing operations. The cash proceeds from both transactions were used to fund a portion of cash payments required to close the acquisition of assets from Rodamco.
Discontinued operations: Discontinued operations contains the operating results of 11 community retail centers in Columbia, Maryland and Tampa Bay Center (see note 1 to the condensed consolidated financial statements). For segment reporting purposes, our share of the NOI of the properties in discontinued operations is included in the operating results of retail centers as discussed above in this Management's Discussion and Analysis. Discontinued operations were $26.7 million and $23.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively, and $(0.1) million and $(0.2) million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively. The increases for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 were attributable primarily to the gain on the sale of the community retail centers discussed above ($27.7 million, net of deferred income tax provisions of $16.4 million). The results for the six months ended June 30, 2002 include a loss incurred in connection with the repayment of debt of properties sold prior to its scheduled maturity ($3.1 million, net of income tax benefits of $2.0 million).
Net earnings: The increase in net earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 as compared to the same periods in 2001 was attributable to the factors discussed above.
25
Financial condition, liquidity and capital resources:
Shareholders' equity increased by $503.2 million from December 31, 2001 to June 30, 2002. The increase was primarily attributable to the sale of common stock in January and February 2002 and net earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2002, partially offset by the payment of regular quarterly dividends on our common and Preferred stock.
We had cash and cash equivalents and investments in marketable securities totaling $54.3 million at June 30, 2002, including $5.6 million of investments held for restricted uses.
In 2000, we obtained a $375 million unsecured revolving credit facility from a group of lenders. The facility is available until December 2003, subject to a one-year renewal option. The revolving credit facility may be used for various purposes, including land and project development costs, property acquisitions, liquidity and other corporate needs. It may also be used to pay some portion of existing debt. Availability under the facility was $230 million at June 30, 2002.
In connection with the acquisition of assets from Rodamco, we borrowed $392.5 million on our bridge loan facility. The bridge loan facility provides for no additional availability and has an initial maturity of six months from the closing of the acquisition. We have the right to extend the maturity on $320 million of the borrowings for an additional six months and on $250 million for another six months. We are required to use any proceeds from sales of interests in operating properties, most property financings and/or issuances of corporate debt or equity securities to repay borrowings under the bridge loan securities.
Our debt at June 30, 2002 is summarized as follows (in millions):
|
Total |
Due in one year |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mortgages and bonds | $ | 3,298.0 | $ | 198.3 | |||
Medium-term notes | 48.5 | | |||||
Credit facility borrowings | 537.5 | 392.5 | |||||
Other loans | 496.0 | 157.2 | |||||
Total | $ | 4,380.0 | $ | 748.0 | |||
As of June 30, 2002, our debt due in one year included balloon payments of $672.7 million, including $392.5 million on our bridge loan facility. In July 2002, we made a balloon payment on an other loan of $41 million using proceeds from borrowings on our revolving credit facility. The remaining balloon payments (excluding the amount of the bridge loan facility) are expected to be made at or before the scheduled maturity dates of the related loans from proceeds of property refinancings (including refinancings of the maturing mortgages), credit facility borrowings, proceeds from the issuance of corporate debt securities and other available corporate funds. We may also obtain extensions of maturities on certain loans, including the bridge loan and revolving credit facilities. We may also sell interests in operating properties or contribute operating properties or development projects (including assets acquired jointly from Rodamco) to joint ventures in exchange for cash distributions from and ownership interests in the joint ventures. We have agreed to contribute our ownership interest in Perimeter Mall to a joint venture in exchange for a 50% interest in the venture and a distribution for reimbursement of our purchase price of approximately $65-70 million. We expect this transaction to close in October 2002 and do not expect to record a gain. Proceeds from this and similar transactions will be used to repay the bridge loan facility.
We expect to spend more than $220 million for new developments, expansions to existing properties and investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures in the remainder of 2002. These expenditures will be financed primarily by the proceeds of construction loans secured by the projects and credit facility borrowings. We are continually evaluating sources of capital, and we believe there are
26
satisfactory sources available for all requirements. As discussed above, dispositions of interests in operating properties are expected to provide capital resources.
We have a shelf registration statement for the sale of up to an aggregate of approximately $2.25 billion (based on the public offering price) of common stock, Preferred stock and debt securities. In January and February of 2002, we issued 16.675 million shares of common stock for net proceeds of $456.3 million ($27.40 per share less issuance costs) under the shelf registration statement. At June 30, 2002, we had issued approximately $815 million in aggregate of common stock and debt securities under the shelf registration statement, with a remaining availability of approximately $1.4 billion.
In connection with the acquisition of the Hughes Corporation ("Hughes") in 1996, we entered into a Contingent Stock Agreement (the "Agreement") for the benefit of the former Hughes owners or their successors (the "beneficiaries"). Under terms of the Agreement, additional shares of common stock (or in certain circumstances, Increasing Rate Cumulative Preferred stock) are issuable to the beneficiaries based on the appraised values of four defined groups of acquired assets at specified "valuation dates" from 2002 to 2009 and/or cash flows generated from the development and/or sale of those assets prior to the valuation dates. To date, we have repurchased shares of our common stock for issuance to the beneficiaries. We intend to sell all of the assets subject to the 2002 valuation date (primarily certain land parcels in Las Vegas and Summerlin, Nevada) in 2002 and will use a portion of the proceeds to repurchase shares for distribution to the beneficiaries. Preliminary estimates of the values of these assets indicate that a distribution of approximately $10-20 million may be required under the terms of the Agreement. However, it is possible that we may not sell all of these assets in 2002. If these assets are not sold in 2002, we expect to use corporate funds or borrowings under our credit facility to repurchase shares of our common stock for issuance to the beneficiaries.
Our qualified defined benefit pension plan (the "plan") currently meets the funding requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA"). We do not expect to be required under the ERISA guidelines to make contributions to the plan in 2002 but expect to make voluntary contributions of approximately $10 million, a level similar to the contributions we made in 2001. We may choose to make additional contributions to maintain or improve the funded status of the plan because a significant portion of the plan's assets consists of marketable equity securities that have declined in value in recent months. A decline in the funded status of the plan, or a failure to make voluntary contributions, could require us to recognize an additional minimum pension liability in 2002 as a charge to other comprehensive income. The recognition of this additional liability would have no effect on our net earnings, but would impact shareholders' equity and comprehensive income.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $153.9 million and $176.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The level of cash flows provided by operating activities is affected by the timing of receipts of rents, proceeds from land sales and other revenues and payment of operating and interest expenses and land development costs. The decrease in net cash provided of $22.9 million was attributable primarily to lower proceeds from land sales. This was partially offset by higher proceeds from rents and other revenues primarily due to the acquisition of properties from Rodamco.
Net cash used by investing activities was $787.8 million and $41.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The increase in net cash used of $746.8 million was due primarily to the purchase of property interests and lower distributions from unconsolidated real estate ventures. In the six months ended June 30, 2001, we received distributions of financing proceeds obtained by unconsolidated real estate ventures of approximately $81 million. These increases in cash used were partially offset by an increase in proceeds from dispositions of interests in properties and a decrease in expenditures for properties in development.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $632.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002, and net cash used by financing activities was $130.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001. The increase in net cash provided of $763.0 million was due primarily to proceeds from the
27
issuance of common stock and borrowings under the bridge loan facility, partially offset by higher net repayments of property debt and other debt (credit facility borrowings) and higher dividends paid.
Unconsolidated real estate ventures:
We have interests in unconsolidated real estate ventures that own and/or develop properties. We use these ventures to limit our risk associated with individual properties and to reduce capital requirements. We may also contribute our interests in properties to unconsolidated ventures for cash distributions and interests in the ventures. In general, these ventures own retail centers managed by us for a fee and are controlled jointly by our venture partners and us.
We have guaranteed the repayment of a construction loan of the unconsolidated real estate venture that is developing the Village of Merrick Park. At June 30, 2002, the outstanding balance under this loan was $105.2 million, all of which was guaranteed. The maximum amount that may be borrowed under the loan is $200 million. The amount of the guarantee may be reduced to a minimum of 20% upon the achievement of certain lender requirements. Additionally, venture partners have provided guarantees to us for their share (60%) of the construction loan.
During 2001, we leased land and improvements at Fashion Show to an entity that is developing a portion of the expansion of the retail center. In connection with this lease, we have guaranteed the repayment of construction loan borrowings by the lessee. At June 30, 2002, the outstanding balance under this loan was $80.6 million, all of which was guaranteed. The maximum amount that may be borrowed under the loan is $111 million. An affiliate of Rodamco owned a 99% interest in the lessee, and we acquired this interest in the acquisition of the assets of Rodamco described in note 11 to the condensed consolidated financial statements. A subsidiary of The Rouse Company Incentive Compensation Statutory Trust, an entity that we neither own nor control, owns the controlling interest in the lessee.
Critical accounting policies
Critical accounting policies are those that are both important to the presentation of our financial condition and results of operations and require management's most difficult, complex or subjective judgments. Our critical accounting policies are those applicable to the evaluation of the collectibility of accounts and notes receivable, the evaluation of impairment of long-lived assets and profit recognition on land sales.
Collectibility of accounts and notes receivable: The allowance for doubtful accounts and notes receivable is established based on quarterly analysis of the risk of loss on specific accounts. The analysis places particular emphasis on past-due accounts and considers information such as the nature and age of the receivables, the payment history of the tenants or other debtors, the financial condition of the tenants and management's assessment of their ability to meet their lease obligations, the basis for any disputes and the status of related negotiations, among other things. Our estimate of the required allowance is subject to revision as these factors change and is sensitive to the effects of economic and market conditions on tenants.
Impairment of long-lived assets: If events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying values of operating properties, properties in development or land held for development and sale may be impaired, a recovery analysis is performed based on the estimated undiscounted future cash flows to be generated from the property. If the analysis indicates that the carrying value of the tested asset is not recoverable from future cash flows, the property is written down to estimated fair value and an impairment loss is recognized. Fair values are determined based on estimated future cash flows using appropriate discount and capitalization rates. The estimated cash flows used for the impairment analyses and to determine estimated fair value are based on our plans for the tested asset and our views of market and economic conditions. The estimates consider matters such as current and historical rental rates, occupancies for the tested property and comparable properties and recent sales data for
28
comparable properties. Changes in estimated future cash flows due to changes in our plans or views of market and economic conditions could result in recognition of impairment losses which, under the applicable accounting guidance, could be substantial.
Properties held for sale, including land held for sale, are carried at the lower of their carrying values (i.e., cost less accumulated depreciation and any impairment loss recognized, where applicable) or estimated fair values less costs to sell. Accordingly, decisions by us to sell certain operating properties, properties in development or land held for development and sale will result in impairment losses if carrying values of the specific properties exceed their estimated fair values less costs to sell. The estimates of fair value consider matters such as recent sales data for comparable properties and, where applicable, contracts or the results of negotiations with prospective purchasers. These estimates are subject to revision as market conditions and our assessment of them change.
Profit recognition on land sales: Cost of land sales is determined as a specified percentage of land sales revenues recognized for each development project. These cost percentages are based on estimates of development costs and sales revenues to completion of each project and are reviewed regularly and revised periodically for changes in estimates or development plans. Significant changes in these estimates or development plans, whether due to changes in market conditions or other factors, could result in changes to the cost ratio used for a specific project.
Impact of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001:
We were largely spared direct losses caused by the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Operations were disrupted only at South Street Seaport, a retail center in lower Manhattan owned and operated by us. Customer traffic, tenant sales and rents at South Street Seaport are generally affected by the level of pedestrian and other traffic and other commercial activity in lower Manhattan. While we expect a significant recovery of traffic and commercial activity in lower Manhattan, we are uncertain as to its timing and scope. Accordingly, it is difficult to predict with certainty when, if ever, customer traffic, tenant sales and rents will return to historical levels. Customer traffic at our other retail centers was lighter than usual for several days after the attacks but has generally returned to more normal levels at our suburban properties. Traffic at our urban specialty marketplaces is more dependent on tourism and continues to be lighter than usual at most of these properties. Las Vegas, where we have a substantial concentration of assets, experienced a significant decline in visitor activity in the weeks following the attacks. Recent data indicate a recovery of visitor activity in Las Vegas, with the exception of international visitors. There can be no assurance that visitor activity in Las Vegas or at our urban specialty marketplaces will return to levels experienced before the attacks.
Information relating to forward-looking statements:
This report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements which reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including those identified below, which could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or those anticipated. The words "will," "plan," "believe", "expect", "anticipate," "target," and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of their dates. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. The following are among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or those anticipated: (1) real estate investment trust risks; (2) real estate development and investment risks; (3) liquidity of real estate investments; (4) dependence on rental income from real property; (5) effect of uninsured loss; (6) lack of geographical diversification; (7) possible environmental liabilities; (8) competition; (9) changes in the economic climate; (10) changes in tax laws or regulations; (11) cost and adequacy of insurance; and (12) risks associated with the acquisition of assets from Rodamco. Further, domestic or international incidents could affect general economic conditions and our business. For a more detailed discussion of these factors, see Exhibit 99.1 of our Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002.
29
Item 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk Information:
Market risk information:
The market risk associated with financial instruments and derivative financial and commodity instruments is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices or rates. Our market risk arises primarily from interest rate risk relating to variable rate borrowings used to maintain liquidity (e.g., credit facility advances) or to finance project development costs (e.g., construction loan advances). Our interest rate risk management objective is to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows. In order to achieve this objective, we rely primarily on long-term, fixed rate nonrecourse loans from institutional lenders to finance our operating properties. We also use interest rate exchange agreements, including interest rate swaps and caps, to mitigate our interest rate risk on variable rate debt. The fair value of these and other derivative financial instruments is a liability of approximately $4.1 million at June 30, 2002. We do not enter into interest rate exchange agreements for speculative purposes.
Our interest rate risk is monitored closely by management. The table below presents the annual maturities and weighted-average interest rates on outstanding debt at the end of each year required to evaluate expected cash flows under debt agreements and our sensitivity to interest rate changes at June 30, 2002. Information relating to debt maturities is based on expected maturity dates and is summarized as follows (dollars in millions):
|
Remaining 2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
Thereafter |
Total |
|||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fixed rate debt | $ | 69 | $ | 320 | $ | 293 | $ | 246 | $ | 392 | $ | 1,866 | $ | 3,186 | ||||||||
Average interest rate | 7.6 | % | 7.5 | % | 7.5 | % | 7.4 | % | 7.3 | % | 7.3 | % | 7.3 | % | ||||||||
Variable rate LIBOR debt |
$ |
399 |
$ |
375 |
$ |
182 |
$ |
115 |
$ |
16 |
$ |
107 |
$ |
1,194 |
||||||||
Average interest rate | 3.8 | % | 4.1 | % | 4.3 | % | 4.4 | % | 4.2 | % | 4.2 | % | 4.1 | % |
At June 30, 2002, approximately $176.6 million of our variable rate LIBOR debt relates to borrowings under construction loans that we expect to repay with proceeds of long-term loans when the construction loans reach maturity.
At June 30, 2002, we had interest rate cap agreements which effectively limit the interest rate on variable rate LIBOR debt as follows (dollars in millions):
Notional Amount |
Interest Cap |
Maturity |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
$ 36.0 | 9.0% | August 2002 | ||
$155.0 | 9.0% | August 2003 | ||
$ 55.0 | 9.5% | March 2004 | ||
$ 4.5 | 8.7% | January 2010 |
At June 30, 2002, we also had interest rate swap agreements that effectively fix the interest rate on $400 million of the variable rate LIBOR debt at 4.0% through January 2003 and on $26.3 million of variable rate LIBOR debt at 6.8% through December 2006.
We also had forward-starting swap agreements that effectively fix the interest rate on $200 million of the variable rate LIBOR debt at 4.2% from January 2003 to January 2004.
All of our interest rate swap agreements and forward-starting swap agreements have been designated as cash flow hedges.
As the table incorporates only those exposures that exist as of June 30, 2002, it does not consider exposures or positions which could arise after that date. As a result, our ultimate realized gain or loss with respect to interest rate fluctuations will depend on the exposures that arise after June 30, 2002, our hedging strategies during that period and interest rates.
30
None
Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds.
None
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
On May 9, 2002, we held our Annual Meeting of Shareholders at our headquarters in Columbia, Maryland. At the meeting, we announced the retirement of Thomas J. McHugh from the Board of Directors and our shareholders reelected three individuals to the Board of Directors for three-year terms.
The individuals below were elected to the Board of Directors for three year terms ending at the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders by the vote set forth below:
|
Votes For |
Votes Withheld |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
David H. Benson | 68,724,501 | 1,029,455 | ||
Platt W. Davis, III | 67,760,678 | 1,993,278 | ||
Juanita T. James | 69,339,708 | 414,248 |
The remaining members of the Board of Directors are as follows:
|
Term Expires |
|
---|---|---|
Jeremiah E. Casey | 2004 | |
Anthony W. Deering | 2003 | |
Rohit M. Desai | 2003 | |
Hanne M. Merriman | 2003 | |
Roger W. Schipke | 2004 | |
John G. Schreiber | 2003 | |
Mark R. Tercek | 2004 | |
Gerard J. M. Vlak | 2004 |
None
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.
Exhibit 99.1Factors Affecting Future Operating Results.
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 17, 2002 disclosing that the Company, Simon Property Group, Inc. and Westfield America Trust completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Rodamco North America N.V. ("Rodamco"), pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, as amended.
Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on July 19, 2002 to include financial statements of the properties acquired from Rodamco and pro forma financial information of the Company.
31
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
on behalf of THE ROUSE COMPANY and as |
|||
Principal Financial Officer: |
|||
Date: August 14, 2002 |
By |
/s/ JEFFREY H. DONAHUE Jeffrey H. Donahue Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
Principal Accounting Officer: |
|||
Date: August 14, 2002 |
By |
/s/ MELANIE M. LUNDQUIST Melanie M. Lundquist Vice President and Corporate Controller |
32
Exhibit No. |
|
|
---|---|---|
99.1 | Factors Affecting Future Operating Results |
33