Back to GetFilings.com

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002

OR

For the transition period from                              to                             

Commission file number 0-11618

HPSC, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

60 STATE STREET, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02109
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code (617) 720-3600

NONE
(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year if changed since last report)

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý    No o

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

        Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date: COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.01 PER SHARE, SHARES OUTSTANDING AT AUGUST 2, 2002, 4,140,619.

HPSC, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2

HPSC, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except per share and share amounts)

(unaudited)

THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

3

HPSC, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002 AND 2001

(in thousands, except per share and share amounts)

(unaudited)

THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

4

HPSC, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR EACH OF THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002 AND 2001

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

5

HPSC, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

1. Basis of Presentation

        The information presented for the interim periods is unaudited, but includes all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) which, in the opinion of HPSC, Inc. (the "Company"), are necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full fiscal year. Certain 2001 amounts have been reclassified to conform with the 2002 presentation. As discussed in Note 11 to the condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company has restated its financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001. These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions of Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures have been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. As a result, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Company's latest annual report on Form 10-K/A filed on August 14, 2002.

2. Earnings Per Share

        The Company's basic net income per share calculation is based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, which does not include unallocated shares under the Company's Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP"), restricted shares issued under the Company's Stock Incentive Plans, treasury stock, or any shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options. Diluted net income per share includes the weighted-average number of common shares subject to stock options and contingently issuable restricted shares under the Company's Stock Incentive Plans outstanding as calculated under the treasury stock method, but not treasury stock or unallocated shares under the Company's ESOP.

3. Equipment Receivables 2000-1 Facility

        During 2001 the Company utilized approximately $91,374,000 of the prefunded restricted cash originally provided to the Company in December 2000 pursuant to the Equipment Receivables 2000-1 term securitization ("ER 2000-1") to fund the Company's financing activities. The remaining unused portion of the prefunded restricted cash of approximately $3,844,000 was used to prepay principal on the ER 2000-1 notes in April 2001. In addition, of the original $1,049,000 of ER 2000-1 note proceeds set aside to service the interest requirements on the prefunded debt, $768,000 was surplus and was released to the Company in April 2001.

        ER 2000-1 entered into interest rate swap contracts as a hedge against interest rate risk related to its variable-rate obligations on the ER 2000-1 Class A and Class B-1 notes. At June 30, 2002, the Company had a total of $167,765,000 outstanding related to off-balance sheet financing contracts sold to Equipment Receivables 2000-1 LLC I ("ER 2000-1 LLC I"). In connection with the amounts financed by ER 2000-1 LLC I through the issuance of its Class A and Class B-1 variable-rate notes, the Company had interest rate swap contracts assigned to third parties with a total notional value of $149,999,000. At June 30, 2002, the Company had a total of $121,858,000 of indebtedness outstanding, net of unamortized original issue discount, related to contracts pledged to Equipment Receivables 2000-1 LLC II ("ER 2000-1 LLC II"). In connection with the amounts financed by ER 2000-1 LLC II through the issuance of its Class A and Class B-1 variable-rate notes, the Company had interest rate swap contracts outstanding with a total notional value of $108,932,000.

6

        In March 2001, the Company received proceeds of $4,909,000, plus accrued but unpaid interest thereon, upon the sale of the ER 2000-1 Class F notes. At the time of the sale, the notes had a remaining face value of approximately $6,060,000.

        The ER 2000-1 Class E notes, originally purchased by Credit Suisse First Boston ("CSFB") for 90% of face value in December 2000, were subsequently resold to a third party investor in May 2001 for approximately 100% of remaining face value. The Company received approximately $359,000 in proceeds from this sale. The remaining $230,000 in proceeds were retained by CSFB. This amount was treated by the Company as a discount on the ER 2000-1 notes.

4. Revolving Loan Facility

        In May 2001, the Company executed a Third Amendment to the Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Fleet National Bank as Managing Agent providing availability to the Company of up to $83,500,000 through May 2002. In May 2002, the Company entered into a Fourth Amendment to the Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement providing availability to the Company through June 2002. In June 2002, the Company executed the Fifth Amendment to the Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the "Revolving Loan Agreement" or "Revolver"), providing availability to the Company of $75,000,000 through August 5, 2002. The Company utilizes borrowings under its Revolving Loan Agreement primarily to temporarily warehouse new financing contracts until permanent fixed-rate financing is available as well as to finance a portion of the loans generated by its ACFC subsidiary. Refer to Note 10 regarding subsequent events.

5. Bravo Facility

        In February 2001, the Company repaid approximately $19,000,000 outstanding under the loan portion of the HPSC Bravo Funding, LLC ("Bravo") revolving credit facility (the "Bravo Facility") with proceeds received from the prefunding arrangement provided through the ER 2000-1 securitization. As of June 30, 2002, the Bravo Facility provided the Company with available borrowings of up to $365,000,000. In July 2002, total available borrowings under the Bravo Facility were increased to $385,000,000 under the same terms and conditions.

        At June 30, 2002, the Bravo Facility had total outstanding on-balance sheet debt of $187,571,000 as well as a total off-balance sheet amount outstanding of $121,871,000 related to sold financing contracts. Bravo incurs interest at variable-rates in the commercial paper market and enters into interest rate swap agreements to assure fixed-rate funding. In connection with these loans and sales, Bravo had interest rate swap contracts outstanding with a total notional value of $300,979,000 at June 30, 2002. Refer to Note 10 regarding subsequent events.

7

6. Segment Information

        A summary of information about the Company's operations by segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 are as follows:

        The following reconciles net segment profit contribution as reported above to total consolidated income before income taxes:

8

        Other Segment Information—The Company derives substantially all of its revenues from domestic customers. As of June 30, 2002, no single customer within the licensed professional financing segment accounted for greater than 1% of the total owned and serviced portfolio of that segment. Within the commercial and industrial financing segment, no single customer accounted for greater than 11% of the total portfolio of that segment. The licensed professional financing segment relies on certain vendors to provide referrals to the Company. For the six months ended June 30, 2002, no one vendor accounted for greater than 6% of the Company's licensed professional financing originations.

7. Derivative Instruments

        At June 30, 2002, the Company had interest rate swap contracts outstanding hedging variable-rate exposures to on-balance sheet debt obligations and also had interest rate swap contracts assigned to non-consolidated entities for the purpose of hedging variable-rate exposures for sold, off-balance sheet financing contracts. The net fair value of the swap contracts hedging on-balance sheet debt obligations, which is recorded on the Company's balance sheet at June 30, 2002, was a liability of $8,307,000. The net fair value of the swap contracts hedging off-balance sheet amounts, which is not recorded on the Company's consolidated balance sheet, was a liability of $9,221,000 at June 30, 2002.

        Comprehensive income consists of unrealized gains and losses resulting from changes in the fair market value of cash flow hedges since the adoption of SFAS No. 133 on January 1, 2001. Details of the Company's comprehensive income (loss) for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 are as follows:

        During the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, the Company's interest rate swaps effectively offset changes in the hedged portion of the cash flows of the Company's variable-rate debt obligations. The swap breakage costs included in net income in the above table relate to the after-tax effect of swap breakage costs realized during the current period. The total pretax cost to terminate the swap contracts for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 was $309,000 and $424,000, respectively, and is reflected as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses.

9

8. Asset Sales

        The Company routinely sells leases and notes due in installments pursuant to securitization agreements. Under each of its securitization agreements, the Company continues to service the financing contracts sold, subject to complying with certain covenants. The Company believes that its servicing fee approximates its estimated servicing costs, but it has limited market basis to assess the fair value of its servicing asset. Accordingly, the Company has valued its servicing asset and deferred liability at zero. The Company recognizes servicing fee revenue as earned over the servicing period in proportion to its servicing costs.

        The following is a summary of certain cash flow activity received from and (paid to) securitization facilities for each of the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001:

        The following is a summary of the performance of the Company's total owned and managed financing contracts:

9. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

        In August 2001, SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets" was issued. SFAS No. 144, which supersedes and amends several earlier interpretations, addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of a long-lived asset or group of assets. This pronouncement provides impairment accounting guidance for tangible long-lived assets either held and used by the entity or disposed of by sale or by other means. The accounting standards may also apply to the Company's residual interest in its leased assets. The adoption of this Statement,

10

which became effective for the Company on January 1, 2002, did not have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

        On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Position ("SOP") 01-6, "Accounting by Certain Entities (Including Entities With Trade Receivables) That Lend to or Finance the Activities of Others". The Company has determined that the adoption of this SOP did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

        In April 2002, SFAS No. 145, "Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections" was issued. This statement rescinds and modifies earlier pronouncements, makes various technical corrections, clarifies meanings, and further describes their applicability under changed conditions. The provisions of this statement will be effective for all fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002. The Company does not believe the modified accounting requirements as provided by SFAS No. 145 will have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

        In July 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities". The standard requires companies to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal activities when they are incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan. Previous accounting guidance was provided by EITF Issue No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)." SFAS No. 146 replaces EITF Issue No. 94-3. The provisions of SFAS No. 146 are to be applied prospectively to exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. The Company is evaluating the impact this statement may have on its consolidated financial results.

10. Subsequent Events

        On August 5, 2002, Fleet National Bank assigned the Company's Revolving Loan Agreement to Foothill Capital Corporation, as Agent (the "Foothill Revolver"). Consequently, the Company executed a Fifth Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement with Foothill Capital Corporation and a group of lenders. The Foothill Revolver provides for a line of credit to HPSC (the "HPSC Foothill Revolver") and a separate line of credit to HPSC's asset-based lending subsidiary, ACFC (the "ACFC Foothill Revolver"). Under the terms of the HPSC Foothill Revolver, the Company may borrow up to $50,000,000 at variable interest rates of prime plus .50% to 1.00% and at LIBOR plus 2.50% to 3.00%, depending upon the Company's balance sheet leverage. Under the ACFC Foothill Revolver, ACFC may borrow up to $20,000,000 at a variable interest rate of prime plus 1.00% for the first 180 days and prime plus 2.00% thereafter. The HPSC Foothill Revolver expires on August 5, 2005. The ACFC Foothill Revolver expires on February 5, 2003. Both the HPSC and the ACFC Revolvers are subject to certain financial covenant requirements which include, among others, tangible net worth, leverage, profitability levels, and interest coverage. Initial proceeds from the Foothill Revolver were used to repay all remaining amounts due to Fleet National Bank under the Revolving Loan Agreement.

        On August 5, 2002, the Company executed a Master Amendment and Waiver Agreement with Triple-A One Funding Corporation and Capital Markets Assurance Corporation (collectively, "MBIA"), to amend covenant requirements of the Bravo Facility to match substantially the covenant requirements of the HPSC Foothill Revolver. The agreement is effective with the quarter ended June 30, 2002. For

11

each quarter prior to that date, a waiver had been obtained for the Company's non-compliance with these covenant requirements. This non-compliance resulted primarily from costs incurred by the Company in connection with completing the ER 2000-1 asset securitization in December 2000 and the impact of the Company's adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard ("SFAS") No. 133. Also on August 5, 2002, the Company executed a Receivables Interest Purchase Agreement with ING Capital LLC ("ING"). Under the terms of the agreement, ING is to provide the Company with additional liquidity of up to 3.75% of Eligible Receivables in the Bravo Facility for assets previously pledged or sold to Bravo, up to a maximum amount of $20,000,000. Interest on ING borrowings is based on one-month LIBOR rates plus 3%. Amounts due ING, which are subordinate to the other lenders in the Bravo Facility, are subject to delinquency and default covenant requirements more restrictive than those contained in the Bravo documents. Concurrent with the execution of the Receivables Interest Purchase Agreement, Bravo sold to ING an initial Receivable Interest Purchase in the aggregate amount of $13,840,000. The proceeds were used to retire amounts outstanding under the Revolving Loan Agreement with Fleet National Bank.

11. Restatement

        On June 17, 2002, the Company announced that it had discovered that an officer of its asset-based lending subsidiary American Commercial Finance Corporation ("ACFC") perpetrated a defalcation against the Company by diverting approximately $5.2 million from the Company to a factoring customer in the financing of fictitious accounts receivable. When the Company discovered the defalcation, forensic accountants were engaged by the Company's special counsel under the direction of the Audit Committee to perform an investigation into the matter. The Company became aware of this defalcation subsequent to the issuance of its financial statements for the period ended March 31, 2002. The Company has restated its financial statements for all periods affected by this defalcation. Additionally, the Company has filed a claim with its fidelity insurance provider in the amount of $1 million. Any recovery will be recorded by the Company in the period that any insurance payment is received.

        The defalcation principally involved the overstatement of Cash and cash equivalents, Restricted cash- Servicing under securitization agreements, Notes receivable and Accounts payable and accrued liability balances. The corresponding loss is recorded to "Loss from employee defalcation". The tax effect of the loss is recorded through deferred income taxes and the resulting net charge recorded to retained earnings on the consolidated balance sheet.

12

        A summary of the effects of the restatement on the Company's Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001 follows:

13

ITEM 2 MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

        As discussed in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has restated its financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001. The accompanying Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition gives effect to the restatement.

Critical Accounting Policies

        The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of financial statements requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company believes that, of its significant accounting policies, the following may involve a higher degree of judgment or complexity:

        Allowance for Losses—    The allowance for losses is established through a charge to the provision for losses. Provisions are made to reserve for estimated future losses arising from the Company's portfolio of leases and note financing contracts. Each reporting period, the Company evaluates the adequacy of the allowance for losses and records an adjustment to the provision for losses to restore the allowance to designated levels. To evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for losses, the Company utilizes certain estimates and assumptions. Management bases these estimates and assumptions on historical experience and on various other factors that they believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Each delinquent customer account is carefully evaluated based on specific criteria, such as delinquency status, value of equipment or other collateral, credit bureau scores, financial condition of any guarantors, and recent payment performance of the obligor. In addition, the Company may factor in other considerations such as historical charge-off rates, delinquency trends and general economic conditions. Applying different estimates or assumptions could potentially produce materially different results from those reported by the Company.

        Sales of Financing Contracts—    The Company periodically sells leases and notes in its securitization facilities. Gains on sales of leases and notes are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations when the Company relinquishes control of the transferred financing contracts in accordance with SFAS No. 140. The Company typically provides credit enhancement through the establishment of a retained interest in the financing contracts sold. Recorded gains or losses upon the sale of financing contracts depends, in part, on the fair value of the retained interest. The Company must also continually evaluate its retained interest in financing contracts sold for impairment to its fair value. These routine fair value calculations require management to utilize certain estimates and assumptions regarding anticipated performance of the financing contracts sold, such as credit risk, prepayments, and discount rates. Management bases its estimates and assumptions on historical portfolio performance. There is no guarantee that historical financing contract portfolio performance will be indicative of future performance.

Results of Operations

        The Company's owned net investment in leases and notes increased by 12% to $443,142,000 at June 30, 2002 from $396,996,000 at December 31, 2001. The total managed portfolio of financing contracts, which includes both leases and notes owned by the Company as well as those sold to others and serviced by the Company, increased to $694,447,000 at June 30, 2002 from $648,406,000 at December 31, 2001, an increase of 7%.

        Earned income from leases and notes for the three months ended June 30, 2002 was $12,789,000 compared to $12,416,000 for the same period in 2001. For the six months ended June 30, 2002, earned income was $25,002,000 compared to $24,447,000 for the comparable period in 2001. The increase for

14

the three month and six month periods was due, in part, to an increase in the Company's financing contract originations in 2002, offset by lower weighted-average implicit interest rates on the owned portfolio. Financing contract originations for the second quarter ended June 30, 2002 increased 1% to $74,220,000 compared to $73,462,000 for the same period in 2001. For the six months ended June 30, 2002, financing contract originations increased 4% to $137,671,000 from $132,952,000 for the same period in the prior year. As of June 30, 2002 and 2001, the weighted-average implicit interest rates on the Company's owned licensed professional financing portfolio were 11.5% and 11.7%, respectively. Earned income, which is net of amortization of initial direct costs, is recognized over the life of the leases and notes using the effective interest method.

        Pre-tax gains from sales of leases and notes were $3,839,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2002 compared to $4,218,000 for the same period in 2001, a decrease of 9%, while for the six month period ended June 30, 2002 pre-tax gains from sales of leases and notes decreased to $5,907,000 compared to $6,862,000 for the same period in 2001, a decrease of 14%. The decrease of $955,000 was due to lower levels of leases and loan contracts sold during the current year, which contributed $1,506,000 to the decrease, offset by improved market pricing for securitizations, which resulted in higher gains of $551,000. For the six months ended June 30, 2002, the Company sold a portion of its beneficial interest in leases and notes totaling $56,704,000 compared to $72,646,000 for the same period in 2001.

        Interest expense, net of interest income on cash balances, was $6,347,000 (49.6% of earned income) for the three months ended June 30, 2002, a 10% decrease from $7,036,000 (56.7% of earned income) for the three months ended June 30, 2001. For the six month period ended June 30, 2002, net interest expense was $12,215,000 (48.9% of earned income) compared to $13,591,000 (55.6% of earned income) for the same period in the prior year, a 10% decrease. The decrease in amount and percentage was largely due to a decline in net interest charges in 2002 from higher interest charges in 2001 associated with the $95,000,000 provided to the Company from the ER 2000-1 prefunding arrangement as well as lower weighted-average cost of funds. Based on average outstanding borrowings, the Company's cost of funds, including its Senior Subordinated Notes, was 5.9% and 7.3% at June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

        Net financing margin (earned income less net interest expense) for the three months ended June 30, 2002 was $6,442,000 (50.4% of earned income) as compared to $5,380,000 (43.3% of earned income) for the second quarter of 2001, a 20% increase. For the six months ended June 30, 2002, net financing margin increased 18% to $12,787,000 (51.1% of earned income) from $10,856,000 (44.4% of earned income) for the same period in the prior year. The increase in amount and percentage was largely due to the decline in net interest charges in 2002 from higher interest charges incurred in the first quarter of 2001 associated with the $95,000,000 provided to the Company from the ER 2000-1 prefunding arrangement as well as a lower weighted-average cost of funds in 2002 compared to 2001.

        The provision for losses for the second quarter of 2002 was $2,806,000 compared to $2,553,000 for the same period in 2001, a 10% increase. The provision for losses for the six months ended June 30, 2002 was $4,586,000 compared to $4,060,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2001, an increase of 13%. The increase for the three and six month periods resulted in part from higher levels of new financings in 2002. In addition, the Company has experienced higher charge-offs in its portfolio of financing contracts. After reviewing these facts as well as the potential impact of general economic conditions, the Company increased the amount of its provision for losses. At June 30, 2002, the Company's allowance for losses was $16,085,000 (3.6% of owned net investment in leases and notes) compared to $15,359,000 (3.9% of owned net investment in leases and notes) at December 31, 2001. Total consolidated net charge-offs for the six months ended June 30, 2002 were $3,860,000 compared to $4,022,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2001. The higher amount in 2001 was partially due to the bankruptcy of an equipment vendor and resulting customer disputes over the products which the Company had financed. During the second quarter of 2001, the Company had agreed to settle the

15

related lawsuit and subsequently wrote-off approximately $1,800,000 remaining due on the disputed customer accounts.

        Selling, general and administrative expenses for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 decreased 11% to $5,566,000 compared to $6,246,000 for the same quarter in the prior year. For the six months ended June 30, 2002, selling, general and administrative expenses were $10,524,000 compared to $11,432,000 for the comparable 2001 period, a decrease of 8%. The decrease in the current year resulted in part from lower legal and collection related expenses in 2002 than incurred in 2001 when the Company experienced extraordinary expenses relating to the bankruptcy of an equipment vendor and lawsuits against the Company relating to the vendor's products which the Company had financed. In addition, swap breakage costs were lower in 2002 than in 2001 when the Company incurred swap breakage costs of an interest rate swap contract in February 2001 upon the transfer of a pool of financing contracts from the Bravo Facility into the ER 2000-1 term securitization. These decreases were offset by higher advertising and marketing expenses. In addition, the Company has experienced higher levels of legal and auditing related fees in 2002 as a result of the employee defalcation described in Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

        For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2002, the Company recorded a loss from employee defalcation of $157,000 and $448,000, respectively, compared to $345,000 and $753,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001.

        The Company's effective income tax rate for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 were approximately 40%. Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2002 was $1,050,000 ($0.24 diluted net income per share) compared to $268,000 ($0.06 diluted net income per share) for the same period in 2001. For the six months ended June 30, 2002, net income was $1,874,000 ($0.44 diluted net income per share) compared to $863,000 ($0.20 diluted net income per share) for the six months ended June 30, 2001. The increase in net income in 2002 compared to 2001 was due, in part, from an increase in earned income on leases and notes and a decrease in interest expense and selling, general and administrative expenses. In addition, the Company incurred lower losses in 2002 with respect to the employee defalcation than it did in 2001. These were offset by an increase in the provision for losses and a decrease in gains on sales of leases and notes.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash and Cash Flow Activities

        At June 30, 2002, the Company had a total of $28,863,000 in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash as compared to $29,997,000 at December 31, 2001. A significant portion of this cash was restricted pursuant to various securitization agreements. Components of restricted cash at June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001 are detailed as follows:

        The following is a description of the significant activities affecting the Company's cash and cash equivalents for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and June 30, 2001.

16

        Cash provided by (used in) operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2002 was $6,335,000 compared to ($636,000) for the same period in the prior year. The significant changes in cash provided by operating activities were net income of $1,874,000 in 2002 compared to $863,000 in 2001, adjusted for a decrease in non-cash gains on sales of leases and notes receivable of $5,907,000 in 2002 compared to $6,862,000 in 2001, increased provision for losses on leases and notes receivable of $4,586,000 in 2002 compared to $4,060,000 in the same period in the prior year, and an increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $448,000 compared to a decrease of $1,714,000 in the prior year.

        Cash used in investing activities was $63,801,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2002 compared to $90,088,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2001. The significant components of cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2002 compared to June 30, 2001 included cash used to originate new leases and notes receivables of $143,802,000 in 2002 compared to $131,805,000 in 2001, and a net increase in notes receivable of $1,126,000 in 2002 compared to $362,000 in the prior year, offset by portfolio receipts of $36,427,000 in 2002 compared to $42,097,000 in 2001, as well as proceeds from sales of leases and notes receivable of $44,855,000 in the current year as contrasted to none for the comparable prior year period.

        Cash provided by financing activities was $57,765,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2002 compared to $92,607,000 for the same period in 2001. The major components of cash provided by financing activities include proceeds from the issuance of Bravo Facility senior notes of $89,708,000 in 2002 as compared to $59,229,000 in the prior year, proceeds from the sale of the Class E and Class F ER 2000-1 term securitization notes in 2001 of $4,563,000 compared to none in 2002, and Revolver loan net proceeds of $11,000,000 in 2002 compared to net repayments of $1,000,000 in the prior year. In addition, restricted cash decreased $1,433,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2002 compared to $92,705,000 for the same period in 2001. The decrease in the prior year resulted primarily from the usage of the prefunded cash provided to the Company through the term securitization in December 2000. These were offset by commercial paper conduit senior note repayments of $18,020,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2002 compared to $22,032,000 for the same period in 2001, and repayments of ER 2000-1 notes of $25,901,000 in the current year compared to $40,137,000 in the prior year.

Revolving Loan Agreement

        In May 2001, the Company signed a Third Amendment to the Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Fleet National Bank, as Agent providing availability to the Company of up to $83,500,000 through May 2002. In May 2002, the Company signed the Fourth Amendment to the Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement providing availability to the Company through June 2002. In June 2002, the Company signed the Fifth Amendment to the Revolving Loan Agreement, providing availability to the Company of $75,000,000 through August 5, 2002. The Company utilizes borrowings under its Revolving Loan Agreement primarily to temporarily warehouse new financing contracts until permanent fixed-rate financing is available as well as to finance a portion of the loans generated by its ACFC subsidiary. Under the Revolver, a base portion of the outstanding borrowings is at variable interest rates of 75 to 125 basis points above the prime lending rate, while the remainder is at 225 to 275 basis points above LIBOR rates. The level of spread to be paid above the base rate and LIBOR rates is dependent upon the Company's balance sheet leverage as well as compliance with certain performance covenants. At June 30, 2002, the Company had $63,000,000 outstanding under the Revolver and $12,000,000 available for borrowing, subject to borrowing base limitations. The Company's borrowings under the Revolver are not currently hedged, and therefore, are exposed to upward movements in interest rates. As of June 30, 2002, the Company was in compliance with all amended Revolver covenant requirements.

17

        On August 5, 2002, Fleet National Bank assigned the Company's Revolving Loan Agreement to Foothill Capital Corporation, as Agent (the "Foothill Revolver"). Consequently, the Company executed a Fifth Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement with Foothill Capital Corporation and a group of lenders. The Foothill Revolver provides for a line of credit to HPSC (the "HPSC Foothill Revolver") and a separate line of credit to HPSC's asset-based lending subsidiary, ACFC (the "ACFC Foothill Revolver"). Under the terms of the HPSC Foothill Revolver, the Company may borrow up to $50,000,000 at variable interest rates of prime plus .50% to 1.00% and at LIBOR plus 2.50% to 3.00%, depending upon the Company's balance sheet leverage. Under the ACFC Foothill Revolver, ACFC may borrow up to $20,000,000 at a variable interest rate of prime plus 1.00% for the first 180 days and prime plus 2.00% thereafter. The HPSC Foothill Revolver expires on August 5, 2005. The ACFC Foothill Revolver expires on February 5, 2003. Both the HPSC and the ACFC Foothill Revolver agreements are subject to certain financial covenant requirements which include, among others, the Company's tangible net worth, interest coverage, leverage, and profitability levels. Initial proceeds from the Foothill Revolver were used to repay all remaining amounts due to Fleet National Bank under the Revolving Loan Agreement.

Bravo Facility

        In March 2000, the Company, along with its wholly-owned, special-purpose subsidiary, HPSC Bravo Funding, LLC ("Bravo"), signed an amended revolving credit facility (the "Bravo Facility") structured and guaranteed by MBIA, Inc. At June 30, 2002 the Bravo Facility provided the Company with available borrowings up to $365,000,000. Under the terms of the Bravo Facility, the Company contributes certain of its financing contracts to Bravo which, in turn, either pledges or sells its interests in these assets to a commercial paper conduit entity. Credit enhancement is provided to the noteholders through financial guarantees provided by MBIA as to the payment of principal and interest on the notes. The Company's current financing strategy is to either pledge or sell eligible financing contracts to Bravo on a monthly basis, thereby minimizing its exposure to fluctuating interest rates in the Revolver. Financing contracts pledged by Bravo, along with the associated debt to the conduit entity, are included on the Company's consolidated balance sheet. In the case of financing contracts sold by Bravo to the conduit entity, the assets and associated debt are removed from the Company's consolidated balance sheet. Additional credit enhancement is provided to investors through the subordination of the Company's retained interest in the financing contracts sold. Risk of loss to the Company is limited to the extent of the Company's retained interest and residual values of equipment in the financing contracts sold. Bravo incurs interest at variable-rates in the commercial paper market and enters into interest rate swap contracts to assure fixed-rate funding. Monthly settlements of principal and interest payments on the notes are made from the collections on the Bravo financing contract portfolio. The Company is the servicer of the Bravo portfolio, subject to meeting certain performance covenants.

        At June 30, 2002, the Company had a total of $187,571,000 outstanding under the loan portion of the Bravo Facility and, in connection therewith, had interest rate swap contracts outstanding with a total notional value of $183,320,000. The total amount outstanding under the sales portion of the Bravo Facility was $121,871,000 at June 30, 2002 and, in connection therewith, the Company had outstanding interest rate swap contracts assigned to third parties with a notional value of $117,659,000. The Bravo securitization agreements contain restrictive covenants governing, among other things, tangible net worth, leverage, interest coverage, and capital expenditures. During each quarter in fiscal year 2001 and in the first quarter of 2002 the Company obtained a waiver from MBIA for the Company's non-compliance with its tangible net worth, interest coverage, and leverage requirements. This non-compliance resulted primarily from costs incurred by the Company in connection with completing the ER 2000-1 term securitization in December 2000 as well as from the adoption of SFAS No. 133.

18

        On August 5, 2002, the Company executed a Master Amendment and Waiver Agreement with Triple-A One Funding Corporation and Capital Markets Assurance Corporation (collectively, "MBIA"), to amend covenant requirements of the Bravo Facility to match substantially the covenant requirements of the HPSC Foothill Revolver. The agreement is effective with the quarter ended June 30, 2002. For each quarter prior to that date, a waiver had been obtained for the Company's non-compliance with these covenant requirements. This non-compliance resulted primarily from costs incurred by the Company in connection with completing the ER 2000-1 asset securitization in December 2000 and the impact of the Company's adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard ("SFAS") No. 133. Also on August 5, 2002, the Company executed a Receivables Interest Purchase Agreement with ING Capital LLC ("ING"). Under the terms of the agreement, ING is to provide the Company with additional liquidity of up to 3.75% of Eligible Receivables in the Bravo Facility for assets previously pledged or sold to Bravo, up to a maximum amount of $20,000,000. Interest on ING borrowings is based on one-month LIBOR rates plus 3%. Amounts due ING, which are subordinate to the other lenders in the Bravo Facility, are subject to delinquency and default covenant requirements more restrictive than those contained in the Bravo documents. Concurrent with the execution of the Receivables Interest Purchase Agreement, Bravo sold to ING an initial Receivable Interest Purchase in the aggregate amount of $13,840,000. The proceeds were used to retire amounts outstanding under the Revolving Loan Agreement with Fleet National Bank.

ER 2000-1

        In December 2000, the Company completed a $527,106,000 private placement term securitization, referred to as ER 2000-1. HPSC, along with subsidiaries ACFC, Bravo, and HPSC Capital Funding, Inc. (a special-purpose entity subsequently terminated in June 2001), transferred certain lease and note contracts to newly formed special-purpose entities, ER 2000-1 LLC I and ER 2000-1 LLC II. ER 2000-1 LLC I and ER 2000-1 LLC II issued notes to finance the purchase of, and loan against, the collateral consisting of the leases and notes transferred from HPSC, ACFC, Bravo and Capital. ER 2000-1 LLC I was formed to meet the criteria of a qualifying, unconsolidated, special-purpose entity within the meaning of SFAS Nos. 125 and 140, while ER 2000-1 LLC II was formed to be a consolidated, special-purpose entity. The carrying value of the financing contracts and associated debt transferred to ER 2000-1 LLC I were removed from the Company's consolidated balance sheet. Credit enhancement is provided to investors through the Company's retained interest in the financing contracts sold. Risk of loss to the Company is limited to the extent of the Company's retained interest and residual values in equipment covered by the contracts sold. Financing contracts transferred to ER 2000-1 LLC II were pledged as collateral on the notes, with the carrying value of the financing contracts and associated debt included in the Company's consolidated balance sheet. The proceeds from the notes were used to retire senior notes and other obligations outstanding in both the Bravo and Capital Facilities as well as to pay down amounts outstanding under the Revolver.

        The securitization further provided for initial proceeds of $95,218,000 to be prefunded to ER 2000-1 LLC I and ER 2000-1 LLC II for the sole purpose of acquiring additional financing contracts from the Company. The prefunding period expired in March 2001, at which time approximately $3,800,000 remained unused and was used to prepay principal on the notes. The ER 2000-1 securitization agreement also provided for $1,049,000 of initial proceeds to be placed in a restricted cash account to service interest requirements on the prefunded debt outstanding during the prefunding period. In addition, initial proceeds of $2,735,000 were deposited in the restricted cash collection account to service the interest requirements on the ER 2000-1 notes for the initial interest accrual period ending in January 2001. At the time of entering into the interest rate swap contracts, the Company deposited $1,000,000 into an interest bearing, cash escrow account as collateral on the swap contracts. The Company provided additional credit enhancement to the ER 2000-1 noteholders through the creation of both cash reserve and residual payment accounts. Pursuant to the terms of the ER 2000-1 securitization agreements, certain excess cash flows generated by the portfolio are deposited to

19

the cash reserve account or residual payment account, up to agreed-upon limits. These restricted cash accounts are available to fund monthly interest and principal payments on the ER 2000-1 notes in the event of deficiencies from the monthly collections. At June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, the balance in these restricted cash reserve accounts was $9,302,000 and $11,624,000, respectively. The Company may also provide additional credit enhancement through the substitution of new leases and notes for leases and notes previously contributed to the securitization, up to certain defined limits.

        ER 2000-1 entered into interest rate swap contracts as a hedge against interest rate risk related to its variable-rate obligations on the Class A and Class B-1 notes. The interest rate swap contracts have the effect of converting the Company's interest payments from a variable-rate to a fixed-rate, thereby locking in spreads on the Company's financing portfolio. At June 30, 2002, ER 2000-1 LLC I had a total of $167,765,000 outstanding related to sales of financing contracts. In connection with the amounts financed by ER 2000-1 LLC I through the issuance of its Class A and Class B-1 variable-rate notes, the Company had interest rate swap contracts assigned to third parties with a total notional value of $149,999,000. At June 30, 2002, ER 2000-1 LLC II had total debt outstanding, net of unamortized original issue discount, with a remaining principal balance of $121,858,000. In connection with the amounts financed by ER 2000-1 LLC II through the issuance of its Class A and Class B-1 variable-rate notes, the Company had interest rate swap contracts outstanding with a total notional value of $108,932,000.

        The Company is the servicer of the portfolio, subject to continuing to meet certain covenant requirements. Monthly payments of principal and interest on the ER 2000-1 notes are made from regularly scheduled collections generated from the lease and note portfolio. Under certain circumstances, the Company, as the servicer, may be obligated to advance its own funds for amounts due on the notes in the event an obligor fails to remit a payment when due. The Company is reimbursed for such advances from available funds upon the subsequent collection from the obligor. Credit enhancement is provided through the structuring of several classes of notes, which are ranked for purposes of determining priority of payment. Under the terms of the various debt agreements, an event of default for non-compliance by the Company with its covenants may result in an immediate acceleration of all principal amounts outstanding under all classes of notes. In the event of such an occurrence, the Company's ability to continue to raise additional liquidity could be adversely affected, which could result in a substantial curtailment of the Company's current growth and operations. In addition, the Company could be replaced as the servicer of the portfolio.

        The Company may periodically continue to utilize term securitizations in the future to finance portions of its financing contracts. The timing and the ability of the Company to complete such financings will depend, to a large extent, on market conditions for such transactions, but there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain such financing or that it will be able to do so in a timely fashion.

Various Banks

        The Company periodically enters into secured, fixed-rate, fixed-term loan agreements with various banks for purposes of financing its operations. The loans are generally subject to certain recourse and performance covenants. At June 30, 2002, the Company had outstanding borrowings under such loan agreements of approximately $9,456,000 with annual interest rates ranged from 6.5% to 8.0%. These loans are included on the Company's consolidated balance sheet as senior notes. In 1995 and 1996, the Company had also sold certain financing contracts to various banks. These sales agreements are subject to covenants that, among other matters, may require the Company to repurchase the financing contracts sold and/or make payments when due. At June 30, 2002, the total outstanding balance of these sold off-balance sheet transactions was $128,000.

20

Senior Subordinated Notes

        In March 1997, the Company issued $20,000,000 of unsecured senior subordinated notes due in 2007 ("Senior Subordinated Notes") bearing interest at a fixed-rate of 11% (the "Note Offering"). The Company received approximately $18,300,000 in net proceeds from the Note Offering and used such proceeds to repay amounts outstanding under the Revolver. The Senior Subordinated Notes are redeemable at the option of the Company, in whole or in part, other than through the operation of a sinking fund, after April 1, 2002 at established redemption prices plus accrued but unpaid interest to the date of repurchase. Beginning July 1, 2002, the Company is required to redeem, through sinking-fund payments, on January 1, April 1, July 1, and October 1 of each year, a portion of the aggregate principal amount of the Senior Subordinated Notes at a redemption price of $1,000,000 plus accrued but unpaid interest to the redemption date. The Company expects to be able to meet its payment obligations under its Senior Subordinated Notes, but there can be no assurance that it will be able to do so.

Total Contractual Obligations

        As described in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition in the Company's 2001 Annual Report, the Company's total contractual obligations consist of short and long-term debt provided through its warehouse and permanent portfolio financings as well as future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases for its office space. At June 30, 2002, there were no material changes to the scheduled maturities of the Company's total contractual obligations from those reported for the period ended December 31, 2001.

        Management believes that the Company's sources of liquidity, including availability of credit under the Foothill Revolver, the Bravo Facility, the ER 2000-1 securitization, the Senior Subordinated Notes, and loans from various savings banks, along with cash obtained from the sales of its financing contracts and from internally generated revenues, are adequate to meet current obligations and carry on current operations. In order to finance its future operations, the Company may seek to raise additional equity and will seek to renew and/or obtain new liquidity facilities. The Company expects that it will be able to obtain additional capital at competitive rates, but there can be no assurance it will be able to do so.

21

ITEM 3 QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

        In the normal course of its business, the Company is subject to a variety of risks, including market risk associated with interest rate movements. Interest rate exposures exist between the time a transaction with a customer is approved and when permanent, fixed-rate financing is secured. The Company does not hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes.

        The Company temporarily warehouses its new fixed-rate financing contracts through variable-rate revolving credit borrowings until permanent fixed-rate financing is obtained through its securitization facilities. The Company is exposed to interest rate changes between the time a new financing contract is approved and the time the permanent, fixed-rate financing is completed, thereby locking in financing spreads. To mitigate this exposure, the Company generally obtains such permanent financing within 60 days of the activation of a new financing contract. The Company believes it will be able to continue to utilize this operating strategy. The Company further manages its exposure to interest rate risk by entering into interest rate swap contracts as a hedge against variable-rate interest incurred through its commercial paper securitization facility as well as its Class A and Class B-1 term securitization notes. These swap agreements have the effect of converting the Company's debt from its securitizations from a variable-rate to a fixed-rate. At June 30, 2002, the net marked-to-market value of interest rate swap contracts hedging on-balance sheet debt obligations was a liability of $8,307,000. Assuming a hypothetical 10% reduction in interest rates from current weighted-average swap rates at June 30, 2002, the marked-to-market valuation of these swap agreements would have been a liability of approximately $11,224,000.

        The Company's portfolio of financing contracts originated in its licensed professional financing segment are fixed-rate, non-cancelable, full payout leases and notes. Changes in current market interest rates result in unrealized gains or losses in the fair value of the Company's fixed-rate assets and fixed-rate debt. In a rising interest rate environment, fixed-rate assets lose market value whereas fixed-rate liabilities gain market value. The opposite is true in a declining rate environment. The fair value of fixed-rate financial assets and liabilities can be determined by discounting associated cashflows at market rates currently available for instruments with similar risk characteristics and maturities. Sensitivity analysis can be applied to determine the positive or negative effect market risk exposures may have on the fair value of the Company's financial assets and liabilities. The following table summarizes the carrying value and estimated fair value of the Company's fixed-rate assets and liabilities at June 30, 2002. The table also demonstrates the degree of sensitivity to the fair value of the Company's fixed-rate financial assets and liabilities assuming a hypothetical 10% adverse change from actual rates:

        The Company's variable-rate assets primarily consist of commercial and industrial asset-based revolving loans originated by ACFC. The carrying value of variable-rate assets and liabilities approximates current fair values. Sensitivity analysis can be used to determine the positive or negative effect on the Company's interest income and expenses due to changes in market interest rates, as summarized as follows at June 30, 2002:

22

Note A: Annualized positive or negative change to interest income and interest expense assuming +/-10% change from current weighted-average market rates.

Forward-Looking Statements

        This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act. When used in this Form 10-Q, the words "believes," "anticipates," "expects," "plans," "intends," "estimates," "continue," "may," or "will" (or the negative of such words) and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, the following: the Company's dependence on maintaining and increasing funding sources; restrictive covenants in funding documents; payment restrictions and default risks in asset securitization transactions to which the Company is a party; customer credit risks; competition for customers and for capital funding at favorable rates relative to the capital costs of the Company's competitors; changes in healthcare payment policies; interest rate risk; the risk that the Company may not be able to realize the residual value on financed equipment at the end of its lease term; interest rate hedge contract risks; risks associated with the sale of certain receivable pools by the Company; dependence on sales representatives and the current management team; and fluctuations in quarterly operating results. The Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including its Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2001, contain additional information concerning such risk factors. Actual results in the future could differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements as a result of the risk factors set forth above, and the risk factors described in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. HPSC cautions the reader, however, that such list of risk factors may not be exhaustive. HPSC undertakes no obligation to release publicly the result of any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect any future events or circumstances.

23

HPSC, INC.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Items 1, 2, 3 and 5 are omitted because they are inapplicable.

Item 4. Submission of matters to a vote of the security holders:

a)

The Annual Meeting of Stockholders was held on May 14, 2002



b)

Not applicable



c)

The stockholders elected the following two persons to serve as Class I Directors:

        The stockholders ratified the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent auditors of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2002:

d)

Not applicable

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

a)

Exhibits



10.1

HPSC, Inc. 2002 Supplemental Stock Incentive Plan, dated May 14, 2002



10.2

Custody Agreement, dated June 25, 2002, by and among HPSC Bravo Funding, LLC, Triple-A Funding Corporation, Capital Markets Assurance Corporation and Iron Mountain Information Management, Inc.



10.3

Master Amendment and Waiver, dated August 5, 2002, by and among HPSC Bravo Funding, LLC, HPSC, Inc., Triple-A Funding Corporation and Capital Markets Assurance Corporation



10.4

Second Amended and Restated Lease Receivable Purchase Agreement, dated August 5, 2002, by and among HPSC Bravo Funding, LLC, HPSC, Inc., Triple-A Funding Corporation and Capital Markets Assurance Corporation



10.5

Receivables Interest Purchase Agreement, dated August 5, 2002, by and among HPSC Bravo Funding, LLC, HPSC, Inc., Triple-A Funding Corporation, BNY Asset Solutions LLC, ING Capital LLC and Capital Markets Assurance Corporation



10.6

Fifth Amendment to Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated June 6, 2002, by and among HPSC, Inc., American Commercial Finance Corporation, Fleet National Bank, individually and as Agent, and the Banks names therein



10.7

Fifth Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated August 5, 2002, by and among HPSC, Inc., the Banks named therein and Foothill Capital Corporation



10.8

Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated August 5, 2002, by and among Fleet National Bank, individually and as Agent, Keybank National Association, Banknorth, N.A., PNC Bank, National Association, Citizens Bank of Massachusetts and Foothill Capital Corporation

24

10.9

Fifth Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated August 5, 2002, by and among American Commercial Finance Corporation, the Lenders named therein and Foothill Capital Corporation



99.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer



99.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer




b)

Reports on Form 8-K:

        During the period for which this report is filed, the Company filed with the Commission the following report of Form 8-K:

        The Company reported on June 18, 2002 that it had uncovered an incident of employee fraud in the factoring portfolio of its subsidiary company, American Commercial Finance Corporation, in the amount of approximately $5 million over a period of four to five years. The Company also announced that its existing credit agreement with Fleet National Bank was extended until August 5, 2002.

25

SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, HPSC, Inc. has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: August 14, 2002

26

QuickLinks