UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ý | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-10521
CITY NATIONAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 95-2568550 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
City National Center 400 North Roxbury Drive, Beverly Hills, California |
90210 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip code) |
Registrant's telephone number, including area code (310) 888-6000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class |
Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
---|---|---|
Common Stock, $1.00 par value Preferred Stock Purchase Rights |
New York Stock Exchange New York Stock Exchange |
No securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES X NO
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
Number of shares of common stock outstanding at March 1, 2002: 49,540,891
Aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant as of March 1, 2002: $2,041,605,497
Documents Incorporated by Reference
The information required to be disclosed pursuant to Part III of this report either shall be (i) deemed to be incorporated by reference from selected portions of City National Corporation's definitive proxy statement for the 2002 annual meeting of stockholders, if such proxy statement is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the Corporation's most recently completed fiscal year, or (ii) included in an amendment to this report filed with the Commission on Form 10-K/A not later than the end of such 120 day period.
Item 1. Business
General
City National Corporation (the "Corporation") was organized in Delaware in 1968 to acquire the outstanding capital stock of City National Bank (the "Bank"). References to the "Company" reflect all of the activities of the Corporation and its subsidiaries, including the Bank. The Corporation owns all the outstanding shares of the Bank.
The Bank, which was founded in 1953 and opened for business in January 1954, conducts business in California. The Bank operates through business and specialty banking units and private banking teams in eleven regional centers as well as 53 banking offices in Alameda, Contra Costa, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara and Ventura counties.
In the three years ended December 31, 2001, the Company acquired three financial services institutions. On December 29, 2000, the Corporation completed the acquisition of Reed, Conner & Birdwell, Inc. ("RCB"), an investment management firm with $1.1 billion in total client assets under management on the date of acquisition. See "Note 2 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" on page A-46 of this report. On February 29, 2000, the Corporation expanded its operations to Northern California through the acquisition of The Pacific Bank, N.A., ("Pacific Bank") which had total assets at December 31, 1999 of $774.9 million. The total purchase price was $145.2 million (including the consideration for outstanding stock options). On August 27, 1999, the Bank acquired American Pacific State Bank ("APSB"), which had total assets at June 30, 1999 of $442.3 million.
On February 28, 2002, the Company completed the acquisition of Civic BanCorp ("Civic") headquartered in Oakland, California with total assets at December 31, 2001 of $524.0 million. The total purchase price was approximately $123.3 million. The Corporation issued approximately 1.5 million shares, including 295,080 shares reserved for stock options assumed with an aggregate market value of $70.0 million and paid the remainder in cash. On March 5, 2002, the Corporation announced the sale of two former Civic BanCorp branches with combined deposits of approximately $37.0 million
The Company is engaged in one operating segment: providing private and business banking, including investment and trust services. The Bank is the second largest independent commercial bank headquartered in California. The Bank's principal client base comprises small-to mid-sized businesses, entrepreneurs, professionals, and affluent individuals. The Bank typically serves clients through relationship banking. The Bank seeks to build client relationships with a high level of personal service and tailored products through private and commercial banking teams, product specialists and investment advisors to facilitate the client, where appropriate for the client, to use multiple services and products offered by the Company. The Company offers a broad range of loans, deposit, cash management, international banking, and other products and services. The Company also lends, invests, and provides services in accordance with its Community Reinvestment Act ("CRA") commitment. Through City National Investments ("CNI"), a division of the Bank, and RCB, a subsidiary of the Corporation, the Company offers personal and employee benefit trust services, including 401(k) and defined benefit plans, manages investments for clients, and engages in securities sales and trading. The Bank also manages and offers mutual funds under the name of CNI Charter Funds.
Competition
The banking business is highly competitive. The Bank competes with domestic and foreign banks for deposits, loans, and other banking business. In addition, other financial intermediaries, such as savings and loans, money market mutual funds, securities firms, credit unions, insurance companies and
2
other financial services companies, compete with the Bank. Furthermore, interstate banking legislation has eroded the geographic constraints on the financial services industry. Recently enacted legislation has facilitated the ability of non-depository institutions to act as financial intermediaries. See "Supervision and RegulationFinancial Services Modernization Legislation."
Economic Conditions, Government Policies, Legislation, and Regulation
The Company's profitability, like most financial institutions, is highly dependent on interest rate differentials. In general, the difference between the interest rates paid by the Bank on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and other borrowings, and the interest rates received by the Bank on its interest-earning assets, such as loans extended to its clients and securities held in its investment portfolio, comprise the major portion of the Company's earnings. These rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond the Company's control, such as inflation, recession, and unemployment, and the impact which future changes in domestic and foreign economic conditions might have on the Company cannot be predicted.
The Company's business is also influenced by the monetary and fiscal policies of the federal government and the policies of regulatory agencies, particularly the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the "Federal Reserve"). The Federal Reserve implements national monetary policies (with objectives such as curbing inflation and combating recession) through its open-market operations in U.S. Government securities, by adjusting the required level of reserves for depository institutions subject to its reserve requirements, and by varying the target federal funds and discount rates applicable to borrowings by depository institutions. The actions of the Federal Reserve in these areas influence the growth of bank loans, investments, and deposits and also affect interest rates earned on interest-earning assets and paid on interest-bearing liabilities. The nature and impact on the Company of any future changes in monetary and fiscal policies cannot be predicted.
From time to time, legislative acts, as well as regulations, are enacted which have the effect of increasing the cost of doing business, limiting or expanding permissible activities, or affecting the competitive balance between banks and other financial services providers. Proposals to change the laws and regulations governing the operations and taxation of banks, bank holding companies, and other financial institutions and financial services providers are frequently made in the U.S. Congress, in the state legislatures, and before various regulatory agencies. See "Supervision and Regulation."
Employees
At December 31, 2001, the Company had 2,084 full-time equivalent employees. None of the employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. The Company considers its employee relations to be satisfactory.
Supervision and Regulation
General
Bank holding companies and banks are extensively regulated under both federal and state law. This regulation is intended primarily for the protection of depositors, the deposit insurance fund, and other clients of the Company, and not for the benefit of stockholders of the Corporation. Set forth below is a summary description of the material laws and regulations which relate to the operations of the Corporation and the Bank. The description is qualified in its entirety by reference to the applicable laws and regulations.
3
The Corporation
The Corporation, as a registered bank holding company, is subject to regulation by the Federal Reserve under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the "BHCA"). In exercising its regulatory authority, the Federal Reserve may:
Under Federal Reserve regulations, a bank holding company is required to serve as a source of financial and managerial strength to its subsidiary banks and may not conduct its operations in an unsafe or unsound manner. In addition, it is the Federal Reserve's policy that in serving as a source of strength to its subsidiary banks, a bank holding company should stand ready to use available resources to provide adequate capital funds to its subsidiary banks during periods of financial stress or adversity and should maintain the financial flexibility and capital-raising capacity to obtain additional resources for assisting its subsidiary banks. A bank holding company's failure to meet its obligations to serve as a source of strength to its subsidiary banks will generally be considered by the Federal Reserve to be an unsafe and unsound banking practice or a violation of the Federal Reserve's regulations or both.
The Bank
The Bank, as a national banking association, is subject to primary supervision, examination, and regulation by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the "Comptroller"). To a lesser extent, the Bank is also subject to certain regulations promulgated by the Federal Reserve and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. If, as a result of an examination of a bank, the Comptroller should determine that the financial condition, capital resources, asset quality, earnings prospects, management, liquidity, or other aspects of the bank's operations are unsatisfactory or that the bank or its management is violating or has violated any law or regulation, various remedies are available to the Comptroller. These remedies include the power to enjoin "unsafe or unsound" practices, to require affirmative action to correct any conditions resulting from any violation or practice, to issue an administrative order that can be judicially enforced, to direct an increase in capital, to restrict the growth of the bank, to assess civil monetary penalties, to remove officers and directors, and ultimately to terminate the bank's deposit insurance.
Various requirements and restrictions under the laws of the United States affect the operations of the Bank. Statutes and regulations relate to many aspects of the Bank's operations, including reserves against deposits, ownership of deposit accounts, interest rates payable on deposits, loans, investments,
4
mergers, and acquisitions, borrowings, dividends, locations of branch offices, and capital requirements. Further, the Bank is required to maintain certain levels of capital. See "Capital Standards."
Financial Services Modernization Legislation
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (the "Financial Services Modernization Act") has established a comprehensive framework to permit affiliations among commercial banks, insurance companies, securities firms, and other financial service providers by revising and expanding the BHCA framework to permit a holding company system to engage in a full range of financial activities through a new entity known as a financial holding company. "Financial activities" include not only banking, insurance, and securities activities, but also merchant banking (subject to proposed capital requirements) and additional activities that the Federal Reserve, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, determines to be financial in nature, incidental to such financial activities, or complementary activities that do not pose a substantial risk to the safety and soundness of depository institutions or the financial system generally. Many provisions of the Financial Services Modernization Act require the adoption of implementing regulations. Some of these regulations have been adopted in final form and are effective, while others have been adopted as interim rules or are not yet effective.
In order for the Corporation to take advantage of the ability to affiliate with certain other financial services providers, the Corporation must elect to become a "financial holding company". The Corporation currently meets the requirements to make an election to become a financial holding company. The Corporation's management has not determined at this time whether it will seek an election to become a financial holding company. The Corporation continues to examine its strategic business plan to determine whether, based on market conditions, the relative financial conditions of the Corporation and its subsidiaries, regulatory capital requirements, general economic conditions, and other factors, the Corporation desires to use any of the expanded powers provided in the Financial Services Modernization Act.
The Financial Services Modernization Act also permits national banks to engage in expanded activities through the formation of financial subsidiaries. A national bank may have a subsidiary engage in any activity authorized for national banks directly or any financial activity, except for insurance underwriting, insurance investments, real estate investment or development, or merchant banking, which may only be conducted through a subsidiary of a financial holding company. Financial activities include all other activities permitted under new sections of the BHCA or permitted by regulation.
A national bank seeking to have a financial subsidiary must be "well-capitalized" and "well-managed." The total assets of all financial subsidiaries may not exceed the lesser of 45% of a bank's total assets, or $50 billion. Further, if the bank is among the 50 largest in the United States, it must have an issue of unsecured long-term debt rated in one of the top three investment grade categories or if the bank is in the next 50 largest banks, as is the Bank, it must meet either the same requirement or have a current long-term issuer credit rating from a nationally recognized statistical rating organization that is within the three highest investment grade rating categories used by the organization. The Bank does not currently qualify to have a financial subsidiary because its credit rating is not in one of the three highest investment grade ratings. National banks, whether qualified to have a financial subsidiary or not, may still conduct activities authorized for national banks directly through operating subsidiaries.
The Corporation and the Bank do not believe that the Financial Services Modernization Act will have a material adverse effect on operations in the near-term. However, to the extent that it permits banks, securities firms, and insurance companies to affiliate, the financial services industry may experience further consolidation. The Financial Services Modernization Act is intended to grant to community banks certain powers as a matter of right that larger institutions have accumulated on an ad hoc basis. Nevertheless, this act may have the result of increasing the amount of competition that the
5
Corporation and the Bank face from larger institutions and other types of companies offering financial products, many of which may have substantially more financial resources than the Corporation and the Bank.
Pursuant to the Financial Services Modernization Act, federal banking regulators have adopted rules that limit the ability of banks and other financial institutions to disclose non-public information about consumers to nonaffiliated third parties. These rules require disclosure of privacy policies to consumers and, in some circumstance, allow consumers to prevent disclosure of certain personal information to a nonaffiliated third party.
In addition, the Financial Services Modernization Act directed federal banking regulators to adopt consumer protection rules for the sale of insurance products by depository institutions. These rules prohibit depository institutions from conditioning an extension of credit on the consumer's purchase of an insurance product or annuity from the depository institution or from any of its affiliates, or on the consumer's agreement not to obtain, or a prohibition on the consumer from obtaining, an insurance product or annuity from an unaffiliated entity. Furthermore, to the extent practicable, a depository institution must keep insurance and annuity sales activities physically segregated from the areas where retail deposits are routinely accepted from the general public. Finally, the rule contain required disclosures and addresses cross marketing and referral fees.
USA Patriot Act of 2001
On October 26, 2001 President Bush signed the USA Patriot Act of 2001. Enacted in response to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, the Patriot Act is intended to strengthen the ability of various agencies of the United States to work cohesively to combat terrorism on a variety of fronts. The potential impact of the Act on financial institutions of all kinds is significant and wide ranging. The Act contains sweeping anti-money laundering and financial transparency laws and requires various regulations, including;
The Company is not able to predict the impact of such law on its financial condition or results of operations at this time.
Dividends and Other Transfers of Funds
The Corporation is a legal entity separate and distinct from the Bank. Dividends from the Bank constitute the principal source of income to the Corporation. The Bank is subject to various statutory and regulatory restrictions on its ability to pay dividends to the Corporation. Under such restrictions, at December 31, 2001 the Bank could have paid dividends of $88.1 million to the Corporation without obtaining prior approval of its banking regulators. In addition, the Federal Reserve has the authority to prohibit the Bank from paying dividends, depending upon the Bank's financial condition, if such payment is deemed to constitute an unsafe or unsound practice.
6
The Comptroller also has the authority to prohibit the Bank from engaging in activities that, in its opinion, constitute unsafe or unsound practices in conducting its business. It is possible, depending upon the financial condition of the Bank and other factors, that the Comptroller could assert that the payment of dividends or other payments might, under some circumstances, be such an unsafe or unsound practice. Further, the bank regulatory agencies have established guidelines with respect to the maintenance of appropriate levels of capital by banks or bank holding companies under their jurisdiction. Compliance with the standards set forth in such guidelines and the restrictions that are or may be imposed under the prompt corrective action provisions of federal law could limit the amount of dividends which the Bank or the Corporation may pay.
Federal law limits the ability of the Bank to extend credit to the Corporation or its other affiliates, to invest in stock or other securities thereof, to take such securities as collateral for loans, and to purchase assets from the Corporation or other affiliates. These restrictions prevent the Corporation and such other affiliates from borrowing from the Bank unless the loans are secured by marketable obligations of designated amounts. Further, such secured loans and investments by the Bank to or in the Corporation or to or in any other affiliate are limited individually to 10.0% of the Bank's capital and surplus and in the aggregate to 20.0% of the Bank's capital and surplus. See "Note 10 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" on page A-57 of this report. Additional restrictions on transactions with affiliates may be imposed on the Bank under the prompt corrective action provisions of federal law. See "Prompt Corrective Action and Other Enforcement Mechanisms."
Capital Standards
Each federal banking agency has adopted risk-based capital regulations under which a banking organization's capital is compared to the risk associated with its operations for both transactions reported on the balance sheet as assets as well as transactions which are off-balance sheet items, such as letters of credit and recourse arrangements. Under the capital regulations, the nominal dollar amounts of assets and the balance sheet equivalent amounts of off-balance sheet items are multiplied by one of several risk adjustment percentages, which range from 0% for assets with low credit risk, such as certain U.S. Treasury securities, to 100% for assets with relatively high credit risk, such as commercial loans.
In addition to the risk-based capital guidelines, federal banking agencies require banking organizations to maintain a minimum amount of Tier 1 capital to total assets, referred to as the leverage ratio. For a banking organization rated in the highest of the five categories used by the federal banking agencies to rate banking organizations, the minimum leverage ratio of Tier 1 capital to total assets is 3%. For all other banking organizations, the minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to total assets is 4%. Banking organizations with supervisory, financial, operational, or managerial weaknesses, as well as organizations that are anticipating or experiencing significant growth, are expected to maintain capital ratios above the minimum levels. In addition to these uniform risk-based capital guidelines and leverage ratios that apply across the industry, the federal banking agencies have the discretion to set individual minimum capital requirements for specific institutions at rates significantly above the minimum guidelines and ratios.
At December 31, 2001, the Corporation and the Bank each exceeded the required risk-based capital ratios for classification as "well capitalized," the highest of five specified capital tiers, as well as the required minimum leverage ratios. See "Management's Discussion and AnalysisBalance Sheet AnalysisCapital" on page A-13 of this report.
7
Prompt Corrective Action and Other Enforcement Mechanisms
Federal banking agencies possess broad powers to take corrective and other supervisory action to resolve the problems of insured depository institutions, including but not limited to those institutions that fall below one or more prescribed minimum capital ratios.
An institution that, based upon its capital levels, is classified as well capitalized, adequately capitalized, or undercapitalized may be treated as though it were in the next lower capital category if the appropriate federal banking agency, after notice and opportunity for hearing, determines that an unsafe or unsound condition or an unsafe or unsound practice warrants such treatment. At each successive lower capital category, an insured depository institution is subject to more restrictions. The federal banking agencies, however, may not treat a significantly undercapitalized institution as critically undercapitalized unless its capital ratio actually warrants such treatment.
In addition to measures taken under the prompt corrective action provisions, commercial banking organizations may be subject to potential enforcement actions by the federal regulators for unsafe or unsound practices in conducting their businesses or for violations of any law, rule, regulation, or any condition imposed in writing by the agency or any written agreement with the agency.
Safety and Soundness Standards
As required by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991, as amended, the federal banking agencies have adopted guidelines designed to assist the federal banking agencies in identifying and addressing potential safety and soundness concerns before capital becomes impaired. The guidelines set forth operational and managerial standards relating to: (i) internal controls, information systems, and internal audit systems, (ii) loan documentation, (iii) credit underwriting, (iv) asset growth, (v) earnings, and (vi) compensation, fees, and benefits. In addition, the federal banking agencies have also adopted safety and soundness guidelines with respect to asset quality and earnings standards. These guidelines provide six standards for establishing and maintaining a system to identify problem assets and prevent those assets from deteriorating. Under these standards, an insured depository institution should: (i) conduct periodic asset quality reviews to identify problem assets, (ii) estimate the inherent losses in problem assets and establish allowances that are sufficient to absorb estimated losses, (iii) compare problem asset totals to capital, (iv) take appropriate corrective action to resolve problem assets, (v) consider the size and potential risks of material asset concentrations, and (vi) provide periodic asset quality reports with adequate information for management and the board of directors to assess the level of asset risk. These guidelines also set forth standards for evaluating and monitoring earnings and for ensuring that earnings are sufficient for the maintenance of adequate capital and reserves.
Federal regulations require banks to maintain adequate valuation allowances for potential credit losses. The Company has an internal risk analysis and review staff that continually reviews loan quality and ultimately reports to the Audit Committee. This analysis includes a detailed review of the classification and categorization of problem loans, assessment of the overall quality and collectibility of the loan portfolio, consideration of loan loss experience, trends in problem loans, concentration of credit risk, and current economic conditions, particularly in California. Based on this analysis, management, with the review and approval of the Audit Committee, determines the adequate level of allowance required. The allowance for credit losses is allocated to different segments of the loan portfolio, but the entire allowance is available for the loan portfolio in its entirety.
Premiums for Deposit Insurance
The Bank's deposit accounts are insured by the Bank Insurance Fund ("BIF"), as administered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the "FDIC"), up to the maximum permitted by law. Insurance of deposits may be terminated by the FDIC upon a finding that the institution has engaged
8
in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations, or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order, or condition imposed by the FDIC or the institution's primary regulator.
The FDIC charges an annual assessment for the insurance of deposits, which as of December 31, 2001 ranged from 0 to 27 cents per $100 of insured deposits, based on the risk a particular institution poses to its deposit insurance fund. The risk classification is based on an institution's capital group and supervisory subgroup assignment. An institution's capital group is based on the FDIC's determination of whether the institution is well capitalized, adequately capitalized, or less than adequately capitalized. An institution's supervisory subgroup assignment is based on the FDIC's assessment of the financial condition of the institution and the probability that FDIC intervention or other corrective action will be required. In addition to its normal deposit insurance premium as a member of the BIF, the Bank must pay an additional premium toward the retirement of the Financing Corporation bonds ("Fico Bonds") issued in the 1980s to assist in the recovery of the savings and loan industry. In 2001 this premium was approximately 1.9 cents per $100 of insured deposits.
Interstate Banking and Branching
The BHCA permits bank holding companies from any state to acquire banks and bank holding companies located in any other state, subject to certain conditions, including certain nationwide- and state-imposed concentration limits. The Company has the ability, subject to certain restrictions, to acquire by acquisition or merger branches outside its home state. The establishment of new interstate branches is also possible in those states with laws that expressly permit it. Interstate branches are subject to certain laws of the states in which they are located. Competition may increase further as banks branch across state lines and enter new markets. From time to time, the Company has considered interstate branch acquisitions, and if deemed feasible, it may engage in an interstate branch acquisition.
Community Reinvestment Act and Fair Lending Developments
The Bank is subject to certain fair lending requirements and reporting obligations involving home mortgage lending operations and CRA activities. The CRA generally requires the federal banking agencies to evaluate the record of a financial institution in meeting the credit needs of its local communities, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. A bank may be subject to substantial penalties and corrective measures for a violation of certain fair lending laws. The federal banking agencies may take compliance with such laws and CRA obligations into account when regulating and supervising other activities.
A bank's compliance with its CRA obligations is based on a performance-based evaluation system which bases CRA ratings on an institution's lending service and investment performance. When a bank holding company applies for approval to acquire a bank or other bank holding company, the Federal Reserve will review the assessment of each subsidiary bank of the applicant bank holding company, and such records may be the basis for denying the application. In connection with its assessment of CRA performance, the appropriate bank regulatory agency assigns a rating of "outstanding," "satisfactory," "needs to improve," or "substantial noncompliance." A bank's CRA rating will also affect the ability of the bank and its bank holding company to take advantage of the new powers granted by the Financial Services Modernization Act. Based on the most current examination report dated January 10, 2000, the Bank was rated "satisfactory." See "Financial Services Modernization Legislation."
Investment Advisers Act
Under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 ("Advisers Act"), investment advisers, such as RCB and City National Asset Management, Inc., a subsidiary of the Bank, who manage $25 million or more
9
in client assets or who act as adviser to a registered investment company must register with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Item 2. Properties
The Company has its principal offices in the City National Center, 400 North Roxbury Drive, Beverly Hills, California 90210, which the Company owns and occupies. The Company actively maintains operations in 53 banking offices and certain other properties.
Since 1967, the Bank's Pershing Square Banking Office and a number of Bank departments have been a tenant of the office building located at 606 South Olive Street in downtown Los Angeles. The building was originally developed and built by a partnership between a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank, Citinational Bancorporation, and Buckeye Construction Co., and Buckeye Realty and Management Corporation (two corporations then affiliated with Mr. Bram Goldsmith, then only a director and currently Chairman of the Board of the Corporation). Since its completion, the building has been owned by Citinational-Buckeye Building Co., a limited partnership of which Citinational Bancorporation and Olive-Sixth Buckeye Co. are the only general partners, each with a 29% partnership interest. Citinational Bancorporation has an additional 3% interest as a limited partner of Citinational-Buckeye Building Co.; the remainder is held by other, unaffiliated limited partners. Olive-Sixth Buckeye Co. is a limited partnership of which Mr. Goldsmith is a 49% general partner; therefore, Mr. Goldsmith has an indirect 14% ownership interest in Citinational-Buckeye Building Co. The remaining general partner and all limited partners of Olive-Sixth Buckeye Co. are not affiliated with the Corporation. Since 1990, Citinational-Buckeye Building Co. has managed the building, which is almost fully leased.
As of December 31, 2001, the Bank owned an unoccupied building in North Hollywood and three other banking office properties: one in Riverside, one in Studio City, and one in Granada Hills.
The remaining banking offices and other properties are leased by the Bank. Total annual rental payments (exclusive of operating charges and real property taxes) are approximately $19.2 million, with lease expiration dates ranging from 2002 to 2011, exclusive of renewal options.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
The Corporation and its subsidiaries are defendants in various pending lawsuits. Based on present knowledge, management, including in-house counsel, is of the opinion that the final outcome of such lawsuits will not have a material adverse effect upon the Company.
The Corporation is not aware of any material proceedings to which any director, officer, or affiliate of the Corporation, any owner of record or beneficially of more than 5% of the voting securities of the Corporation as of December 31, 2001, or any associate of any such director, officer, or security holder is a party adverse to the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries or has a material interest adverse to the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
There was no submission of matters to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2001.
10
Item 4A. Executive Officers of the Registrant
Shown below are names and ages of all executive officers of the Corporation and officers of the Bank who are deemed to be executive officers of the Corporation, with indication of all positions and offices with the Corporation and the Bank. Mr. Russell Goldsmith is the son of Mr. Bram Goldsmith.
Name |
Age |
Present principal occupation and principal occupation during the past five years |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Russell D. Goldsmith | 52 | Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, City National Corporation since October 1995; Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, City National Bank since October 1995 | ||
Bram Goldsmith |
79 |
Chairman of the Board, City National Corporation |
||
George H. Benter, Jr. |
60 |
President, City National Corporation since 1993; President and Chief Operating Officer, City National Bank since 1992 |
||
Frank P. Pekny |
58 |
Executive Vice President and Treasurer/Chief Financial Officer, City National Corporation since 1992; Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer since 1995, City National Bank |
||
Michael B. Cahill |
48 |
Executive Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel, City National Bank and City National Corporation, since June 2001; President and CEO, Avista Ventures, Inc., and Pentzer Corporation, 1999-2001; President and CEO, Imfax, Inc. 1997-1999 |
||
Heng W. Chen |
49 |
Assistant Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Treasurer since June 1998, Controller, 1996 to 1998, Assistant Treasurer, 1991 to 1996, City National Corporation; Executive Vice President, Finance since March 2000, Senior Vice President, Finance, June 1998 to March 2000, Senior Vice President-Finance and Controller, 1995 to 1998, City National Bank |
||
Jan R. Cloyde |
51 |
Executive Vice President and Director of Banking Services, City National Bank since October 1998; Executive Vice President Home Savings of America from September 1996 to September 1998 |
||
Stephen D. McAvoy |
56 |
Controller, City National Corporation since March 1998; Senior Vice President and Controller, City National Bank since March 1998; Vice PresidentController, Transamerica Home Loan, August 1997 to February 1998; Consultant in the area of the Financial Controller functions, Transamerica Home Loan, June 1997 to August 1997, Transamerica Financial Services, May 1996 to June 1997 |
||
Robert A. Moore |
59 |
Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer, City National Bank since 1992 |
11
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
The Corporation's common stock is listed and traded principally on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "CYN." Information concerning the range of high and low sales prices for the Corporation's common stock, and the dividends declared, for each quarterly period within the past two fiscal years is set forth below.
Quarter ended |
High |
Low |
Dividends Declared |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2001 | |||||||||
March 31 | $ | 40.31 | $ | 32.97 | $ | 0.185 | |||
June 30 | 45.00 | 35.50 | 0.185 | ||||||
September 30 | 49.75 | 39.11 | 0.185 | ||||||
December 31 | 47.19 | 37.25 | 0.185 | ||||||
2000 |
|||||||||
March 31 | $ | 35.06 | $ | 25.50 | $ | 0.175 | |||
June 30 | 40.25 | 32.13 | 0.175 | ||||||
September 30 | 40.81 | 35.00 | 0.175 | ||||||
December 31 | 39.75 | 30.75 | 0.175 |
As of March 1, 2002 the closing price of the Corporation's stock on the New York Stock Exchange was $51.09 per share. As of that date, there were approximately 1,959 record holders of the Corporation's common stock. On January 23, 2002, the Board of Directors authorized a regular quarterly cash dividend on its common stock at an increased rate of $0.195 per share payable on February 19, 2002.
For a discussion of dividend restrictions on the Corporation's common stock, see "Note 10 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" on page A-57 of this report.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The information required by this item appears on page A-2, under the caption "Selected Financial Information," and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The information required by this item appears on pages A-3 through A-34, under the caption "Management's Discussion and Analysis," and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The information required by this item appears on pages A-14 through A-18, under the caption "Management's Discussion and Analysis," and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The information required by this item appears on pages A-36 through A-67 and on page A-34, under the captions "2001 Quarterly Operating Results" and "2000 Quarterly Operating Results," and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
12
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
The information required by this item, to the extent not included under "Item 4A. Executive Officers of the Registrant" in Part I of this report, will appear in the Corporation's definitive proxy statement for the 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "2002 Proxy Statement"), and such information either shall be (i) deemed to be incorporated herein by reference from that portion of the 2002 Proxy Statement, if filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the Corporation's most recently completed fiscal year, or (ii) included in an amendment to this report filed with the Commission on Form 10-K/A not later than the end of such 120 day period.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this item will appear in the 2002 Proxy Statement, and such information either shall be (i) deemed to be incorporated herein by reference from the 2002 Proxy Statement, if filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the Corporation's most recently completed fiscal year, or (ii) included in an amendment to this report filed with the Commission on Form 10-K/A not later than the end of such 120 day period.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The information required by this item will appear in the 2002 Proxy Statement, and such information either shall be (i) deemed to be incorporated herein by reference from the 2002 Proxy Statement, if filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the Corporation's most recently completed fiscal year, or (ii) included in an amendment to this report filed with the Commission on Form 10-K/A not later than the end of such 120 day period.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
The information required by this item will appear in the 2002 Proxy Statement, and such information either shall be (i) deemed to be incorporated herein by reference from the 2001 Proxy Statement, if filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the Corporation's most recently completed fiscal year, or (ii) included in an amendment to this report filed with the Commission on Form 10-K/A not later than the end of such 120 day period. Also see "Note 4 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" on page A-48 of this report.
13
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K
Management's Responsibility for Financial Statements | A-35 | |
Independent Auditors' Report | A-36 | |
Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2001 and 2000 | A-37 | |
Consolidated Statement of Income and Comprehensive Income for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001 | A-38 | |
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001 | A-39 | |
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders' Equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001 | A-40 | |
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements | A-41 |
No. |
|
|
---|---|---|
3.1 | Restated Certificate of Incorporation (This Exhibit is incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999.) | |
3.1.1 | Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock (This Exhibit is incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999.) | |
3.2 | Bylaws, as amended to date (This Exhibit is incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999.) | |
4.1 | 63/8% Subordinated Notes Due 2008 in the principal amount of $125 million (This Exhibit is incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997.) | |
4.11 | 63/4% Subordinated Notes Due 2011 in the principal amount of $150.0 million | |
4.12 | CN Real Estate Investment Corporation Articles of Incorporation | |
4.13 | CN Real Estate Investment Corporation By Laws | |
4.14 | CN Real Estate Investment Corporation Certificate of Determination | |
4.15 | CN Real Estate Investment Corporation Servicing Agreement | |
4.2 | Rights Agreement dated as of February 26, 1997 between the Registrant and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent (This Exhibit is incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999.) | |
10.2.2 | * | Sixth Amendment to Spit Dollar Life Insurance Agreement Collateral Assignment Plan between City National Bank and the Goldsmith 1980 Insurance Trust, dated March 18, 1998 (This Exhibit is incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997.) |
14
10.2.3 | * | Seventh Amendment to Split Dollar Life Insurance Agreement Collateral Assignment Plan between City National Bank and the Goldsmith 1980 Insurance Trust, dated June 1, 1999 (This Exhibit is incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1999.) |
10.2.4 | * | Employment Agreement made as of May 15, 2001, by and between Bram Goldsmith, and the Registrant and City National Bank, including Eighth Amendment to Split Dollar Life Insurance Agreement Collateral Assignment Plan between City National Bank and the Goldsmith 1980 Insurance Trust, dated May 15, 2001 (This Exhibit is incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2001.) |
10.3 | * | Split Dollar Life Insurance Agreement Collateral Assignment Plan between City National Bank and the Goldsmith 1980 Insurance Trust, dated as of June 13, 1980, and first through fourth amendments thereto (This Exhibit is incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999.) |
10.3.1 | * | Fifth Amendment to Split Dollar Life Insurance Agreement Collateral Assignment Plan between City National Bank and the Goldsmith 1980 Insurance Trust, dated May 15, 1995 (This Exhibit is incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997.) |
10.10 | * | 1985 Stock Option Plan, as amended to date (This Exhibit is incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999.) |
10.22.1 | * | Stock Option Agreement under the Registrant's 1985 Stock Option Plan dated as of October 16, 1995, between the Registrant and Russell Goldsmith (This Exhibit is incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000.) |
10.22.2 | * | Employment Agreement made as of July 15, 1998 by and between Russell Goldsmith and the Registrant and City National Bank (This Exhibit is incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1998.) |
10.22.3 | * | First Amendment to Employment Agreement made as of July 15, 1998 by and between Russell Goldsmith and the Registrant and City National Bank (This Exhibit is incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2001.) |
10.24 | * | 1995 Omnibus Plan (This Exhibit is incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000.) |
10.24.1 | * | Amended and Restated Section 2.8 of 1995 Omnibus Plan (This Exhibit is incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997.) |
10.28 | Lease dated September 30, 1996, between Citinational-Buckeye Building Co. and City National Bank (This Exhibit is incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997.) | |
10.29 | * | 1999 Omnibus Plan (This Exhibit is incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999.) |
10.30 | * | 1999 Variable Bonus Plan (This Exhibit is incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999.) |
15
10.30.1 | * | First Amendment to 1999 Variable Bonus Plan (This Exhibit is incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2001.) |
10.31 | * | 2000 City National Bank Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (This Exhibit is incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000.) |
10.32 | * | Form of Change of Control Agreement for members of City National Bank executive committee (This Exhibit is incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999.) |
10.33 | * | 2000 City National Bank Director Deferred Compensation Plan (This Exhibit is incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000.) |
10.34 | * | City National Bank Executive Management Bonus Plan (This Exhibit is incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000.) |
10.35 | City National Corporation 2001 Stock Option Plan (This Exhibit is incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000.) | |
21 | Subsidiaries of the Registrant | |
23.1 | Consent of KPMG LLP |
The registrant filed a report, dated November 19, 2001, on Form 8-K under item 5 regarding entering into a definitive Agreement and Plan of Merger with Civic BanCorp dated as of November 16, 2001.
16
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
CITY NATIONAL CORPORATION (Registrant) |
|||
By |
/s/ RUSSELL D. GOLDSMITH Russell D. Goldsmith, Chief Executive Officer |
March 15, 2002
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature |
Title |
Date |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
/s/ RUSSELL D. GOLDSMITH Russell D. Goldsmith (Principal Executive Officer) |
Vice Chairman/ Chief Executive Officer and Director | March 15, 2002 | ||
/s/ FRANK P. PEKNY Frank P. Pekny (Principal Financial Officer) |
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
March 15, 2002 |
||
/s/ STEPHEN D. MCAVOY Stephen D. McAvoy (Principal Accounting Officer) |
Controller |
March 15, 2002 |
||
/s/ BRAM GOLDSMITH Bram Goldsmith |
Chairman of the Board and Director |
March 15, 2002 |
||
/s/ GEORGE H. BENTER, JR. George H. Benter, Jr. |
President and Director |
March 15, 2002 |
||
/s/ RICHARD L. BLOCH Richard L. Bloch |
Director |
March 15, 2002 |
||
17
/s/ STUART D. BUCHALTER Stuart D. Buchalter |
Director |
March 15, 2002 |
||
/s/ MICHAEL L. MEYER Michael L. Meyer |
Director |
March 15, 2002 |
||
/s/ RONALD L. OLSON Ronald L. Olson |
Director |
March 15, 2002 |
||
/s/ WILLIAM B. RICHARDSON William B. Richardson |
Director |
March 15, 2002 |
||
/s/ CHARLES E. RICKERSHAUSER, JR. Charles E. Rickershauser, Jr. |
Director |
March 15, 2002 |
||
/s/ ROBERT H. TUTTLE Robert H. Tuttle |
Director |
March 15, 2002 |
||
/s/ ANDREA L. VAN DE KAMP Andrea L. Van de Kamp |
Director |
March 15, 2002 |
||
/s/ KENNETH ZIFFREN Kenneth Ziffren |
Director |
March 15, 2002 |
18
Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts |
2001 |
2000 |
Increase (Decrease) Amount |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOR THE YEAR | |||||||||||
Net income | $ | 146,170 | $ | 131,660 | $ | 14,510 | |||||
Net income per common share, basic | 3.05 | 2.79 | 0.26 | ||||||||
Net income per common share, diluted | 2.96 | 2.72 | 0.24 | ||||||||
Dividends per common share | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.04 | ||||||||
AT YEAR END |
|||||||||||
Assets | $ | 10,176,316 | $ | 9,096,669 | $ | 1,079,647 | |||||
Deposits | 8,131,202 | 7,408,670 | 722,532 | ||||||||
Loans | 7,159,206 | 6,527,145 | 632,061 | ||||||||
Securities | 1,814,839 | 1,547,844 | 266,995 | ||||||||
Shareholders' equity | 890,577 | 743,648 | 146,929 | ||||||||
Book value per common share | 18.50 | 15.61 | 2.89 | ||||||||
AVERAGE BALANCES |
|||||||||||
Assets | $ | 9,328,512 | $ | 8,426,129 | $ | 902,383 | |||||
Deposits | 7,067,984 | 6,334,846 | 733,138 | ||||||||
Loans | 6,713,315 | 6,236,334 | 476,981 | ||||||||
Securities | 1,656,028 | 1,350,971 | 305,057 | ||||||||
Shareholders' equity | 825,344 | 667,618 | 157,726 | ||||||||
SELECTED RATIOS |
|||||||||||
Return on average assets | 1.57 | % | 1.56 | % | 0.01 | % | |||||
Return on average shareholders' equity | 17.71 | 19.72 | (2.01 | ) | |||||||
Tier 1 leverage ratio | 7.26 | 6.49 | 0.77 | ||||||||
Total risk-based capital ratio | 14.08 | 10.85 | 3.23 | ||||||||
Dividend payout ratio per common share | 24.26 | 24.95 | (0.69 | ) | |||||||
Net interest margin | 5.26 | 5.44 | (0.18 | ) | |||||||
Efficiency ratio | 54.08 | 55.76 | (1.68 | ) | |||||||
CASH BASIS RESULTS (1) |
|||||||||||
FOR THE YEAR | |||||||||||
Net income | $ | 161,978 | $ | 145,721 | $ | 16,257 | |||||
Net income per common share, basic | 3.38 | 3.09 | 0.29 | ||||||||
Net income per common share, diluted | 3.28 | 3.01 | 0.27 | ||||||||
Return on average assets | 1.77 | % | 1.76 | % | 0.01 | % | |||||
Return on average shareholders' equity | 25.01 | 29.17 | (4.16 | ) | |||||||
Efficiency ratio | 50.90 | 52.61 | (1.71 | ) | |||||||
AT YEAR END |
|||||||||||
Assets under management | $ | 7,651,037 | $ | 6,653,616 | $ | 997,421 | |||||
Assets under management or admisitration | 18,785,619 | 18,042,973 | 742,646 |
A-1
SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
As of or for the year ended December 31, |
|||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dollars in thousands, except per share data |
||||||||||||||||||
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
1998 |
1997 |
||||||||||||||
Statement of Operations Data: | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 625,248 | $ | 646,288 | $ | 470,446 | $ | 423,949 | $ | 357,996 | ||||||||
Interest expense | 191,094 | 239,772 | 148,441 | 130,278 | 104,328 | |||||||||||||
Net interest income | 434,154 | 406,516 | 322,005 | 293,671 | 253,668 | |||||||||||||
Provision for credit losses | 35,000 | 21,500 | | | | |||||||||||||
Noninterest income | 132,384 | 109,484 | 87,212 | 67,684 | 53,418 | |||||||||||||
Noninterest expense | 313,395 | 294,770 | 241,803 | 211,331 | 181,757 | |||||||||||||
Income before taxes | 218,143 | 199,730 | 167,414 | 150,024 | 125,329 | |||||||||||||
Income taxes | 71,973 | 68,070 | 59,307 | 53,796 | 45,196 | |||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 146,170 | $ | 131,660 | $ | 108,107 | $ | 96,228 | $ | 80,133 | ||||||||
Per Share Data: | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income per share, basic | $ | 3.05 | $ | 2.79 | $ | 2.37 | $ | 2.08 | $ | 1.74 | ||||||||
Net income per share, diluted | 2.96 | 2.72 | 2.30 | 2.00 | 1.68 | |||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.56 | 0.44 | |||||||||||||
Book value per share | 18.50 | 15.61 | 12.58 | 12.21 | 11.03 | |||||||||||||
Shares used to compute income per share, basic | 47,896 | 47,178 | 45,683 | 46,357 | 46,018 | |||||||||||||
Shares used to compute income per share, diluted | 49,376 | 48,393 | 46,938 | 48,141 | 47,809 | |||||||||||||
Balance Sheet DataAt Period End: | ||||||||||||||||||
Assets | $ | 10,176,316 | $ | 9,096,669 | $ | 7,213,619 | $ | 6,427,781 | $ | 5,252,032 | ||||||||
Deposits | 8,131,202 | 7,408,670 | 5,669,409 | 4,887,402 | 4,228,348 | |||||||||||||
Loans | 7,159,206 | 6,527,145 | 5,490,669 | 4,530,427 | 3,825,224 | |||||||||||||
Securities | 1,814,839 | 1,547,844 | 1,102,092 | 1,012,526 | 833,122 | |||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets | 9,447,311 | 8,286,067 | 6,677,475 | 5,982,968 | 4,838,926 | |||||||||||||
Shareholders' equity | 890,577 | 743,648 | 571,646 | 561,803 | 508,670 | |||||||||||||
Balance Sheet DataAverage Balances: | ||||||||||||||||||
Assets | $ | 9,328,512 | $ | 8,426,129 | $ | 6,488,834 | $ | 5,633,829 | $ | 4,703,886 | ||||||||
Deposits | 7,067,984 | 6,334,846 | 4,809,800 | 4,267,602 | 3,614,068 | |||||||||||||
Loans | 6,713,315 | 6,236,334 | 4,822,254 | 4,213,853 | 3,387,784 | |||||||||||||
Securities | 1,656,028 | 1,350,971 | 1,050,716 | 842,346 | 829,557 | |||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets | 8,520,242 | 7,698,884 | 5,985,018 | 5,187,897 | 4,290,453 | |||||||||||||
Shareholders' equity | 825,344 | 667,618 | 564,091 | 538,426 | 472,843 | |||||||||||||
Asset Quality: | ||||||||||||||||||
Nonaccrual loans | $ | 38,563 | $ | 61,986 | $ | 25,288 | $ | 23,138 | $ | 27,566 | ||||||||
ORE | 10 | 522 | 1,413 | 3,480 | 2,126 | |||||||||||||
Total nonaccrual loans and ORE | $ | 38,573 | $ | 62,508 | $ | 26,701 | $ | 26,618 | $ | 29,692 | ||||||||
Performance Ratios: | ||||||||||||||||||
Return on average assets | 1.57 | % | 1.56 | % | 1.67 | % | 1.71 | % | 1.70 | % | ||||||||
Return on average shareholders' equity | 17.71 | 19.72 | 19.16 | 17.87 | 16.95 | |||||||||||||
Net interest spread | 3.95 | 3.81 | 4.12 | 4.27 | 4.64 | |||||||||||||
Net interest margin | 5.26 | 5.44 | 5.56 | 5.86 | 6.13 | |||||||||||||
Average shareholders' equity to average assets | 8.85 | 7.92 | 8.69 | 9.56 | 10.05 | |||||||||||||
Dividend payout ratio, per share | 24.26 | 24.95 | 27.91 | 27.06 | 26.19 | |||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio | 54.08 | 55.76 | 57.58 | 56.87 | 58.22 | |||||||||||||
Asset Quality Ratios: | ||||||||||||||||||
Nonaccrual loans to total loans | 0.54 | % | 0.95 | % | 0.46 | % | 0.51 | % | 0.72 | % | ||||||||
Nonaccrual loans and ORE to total loans and ORE | 0.54 | 0.96 | 0.49 | 0.59 | 0.78 | |||||||||||||
Allowance for credit losses to total loans | 2.00 | 2.07 | 2.44 | 2.99 | 3.60 | |||||||||||||
Allowance for credit losses to nonaccrual loans | 370.46 | 218.49 | 530.20 | 584.92 | 499.75 | |||||||||||||
Net (charge offs) recoveries to average loans | (0.41 | ) | (0.48 | ) | (0.10 | ) | (0.12 | ) | 0.02 |
A-2
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OVERVIEW
The Corporation is the holding company for the Bank. References to the "Company" mean the Corporation and the Bank together. The financial information presented herein includes the account of the Corporation, its non-bank subsidiaries, the Bank, and the Bank's wholly owned subsidiaries. All material transactions between these entities are eliminated.
See "Cautionary Statement for Purposes of the "Safe Harbor" Provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995," on pages A-32 and A-33 in connection with "forward looking" statements included in this report.
Consolidated net income for 2001 was $146.2 million, or $2.96 per diluted common share, compared with $131.7 million, or $2.72 per diluted common share, in 2000. Cash net income, which excludes the amortization of goodwill and core deposit intangibles from acquisitions, for the year ended December 31, 2001 was $162.0 million, or $3.28 per diluted common share, compared with $145.7 million, or $3.01 per diluted common share, for the year ended December 31, 2000. Eliminating only the impact of the amortization of goodwill, which will take effect in 2002 with the implementation of a new GAAP standard, pro forma net income would have been $159.0 million, or $3.22 per share. The increase in net income reflects the growth in the Company's loans and deposits during 2001 as well as an increase in service fees. Net interest income on a fully taxable-equivalent basis for 2001 increased $28.7 million over 2000. Noninterest income increased $22.9 million compared with 2000. Partially offsetting these increases was an $18.6 million increase in noninterest expense and a $13.5 million increase in the provision for credit losses in 2001 compared with 2000.
The return on average assets in 2001 was 1.57%, compared with 1.56% in 2000. The return on average shareholders' equity declined to 17.71%, compared with 19.72% for the prior year. The lower return on average shareholders' equity for the year compared with the prior year was due primarily to a higher level of shareholders' equity which resulted from retention of current year earnings, increased unrealized gains on securities and the positive mark-to-market valuation of interest rate swaps treated as cash flow hedges. On a cash basis (which excludes goodwill and the after-tax impact of nonqualifying core deposit intangibles from average assets and average shareholders' equity), the return on average assets was 1.77% and the return on average shareholders' equity was 25.01% in 2001, compared with 1.76% and 29.17%, respectively, in 2000. The Company's cash efficiency ratio for 2001 improved to 50.90% from 52.61% in 2000. The 3% improvement is due to increased revenues and management's continued emphasis on enhancing efficiency and productivity.
Estimates of business and economic levels and the related effect on earnings during 2002 are subject to a great degree of variability given current world events, California's economy and the effect of changing interest rates. Management is optimistic about continued solid performance going forward and net income per diluted common share for 2002 is currently expected to be approximately 7.0% to 10.0% higher than proforma net income per diluted common share of $3.22 for 2001, which excludes the impact of the amortization of goodwill. This excludes the impact of any acquisitions.
Total assets at December 31, 2001 were $10,176.3 million, compared with $9,096.7 million at December 31, 2000.
Total average assets increased to $9,328.5 million in 2001 from $8,426.1 million in 2000, an increase of $902.4 million, or 10.7%, primarily due to increases in average loans and average securities. Total average loans rose to $6,713.3 million for the year 2001, an increase of 7.6% over the prior year. Year-over-year loan growth was driven primarily by increases in real estate mortgages, residential first mortgages, commercial loans and construction loans. Average deposits rose during the year 2001 to $7,068.0 million, an increase of 11.6% over $6,334.8 million for 2000.
A-3
Total nonperforming assets (nonaccrual loans and ORE) were $38.6 million, or 0.54% of total loans and ORE at December 31, 2001, compared with $62.5 million, or 0.96%, at December 31, 2000. The allowance for credit losses at December 31, 2001 totaled $142.9 million, or 2.00% of outstanding loans. Net loan charge-offs were $27.6 million and $30.1 million for the years 2001 and 2000, respectively. The decreases in nonperforming assets and net loan charge-offs in 2001 was primarily due to the decrease in the Bank's syndicated non-relationship loans. Syndicated non-relationship loans were $86.9 million, or approximately 1% of the loan portfolio at December 31, 2001, compared with $191.8 million, or 3% of the total loan portfolio, at December 31, 2000. Management believes the allowance for credit losses is adequate to cover risks inherent in the portfolio at December 31, 2001.
The Corporation regularly evaluates, and holds discussions with, various potential acquisition candidates. Over the last three years, the Company's assets, loans and deposits have grown by 58%, 58% and 66%, respectively. The growth reflects the successful sales efforts of the Company's colleagues. The growth was augmented however, by the bank acquisitions closed by the Company over that same period.
On December 29, 2000, the Corporation acquired RCB, an investment management firm which had $1.1 billion in assets under management. The total consideration was valued at $15.4 million and includes equity participation notes payable to the sellers due in 2003 and 2005. The acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting and resulted in goodwill of $14.3 million.
On February 29, 2000, the Corporation completed its acquisition of Pacific Bank. The Corporation paid consideration equal to $145.2 million (including the consideration for stock options), 47.0% of which was paid in the Corporation's common stock and 53.0% of which was paid in cash. The transaction was accounted for as a purchase. Pacific Bank had total assets, loans, and deposits of $782.0 million, $488.0 million, and $702.0 million, respectively, at the date of acquisition. The acquisition resulted in goodwill and core deposit intangibles of $70.9 million.
On August 27, 1999, the Bank completed its acquisition of APSB. The total purchase price was $90.4 million in an all cash transaction accounted for as a purchase. APSB had total assets, loans, and deposits of $450.0 million, $255.0 million, and $411.0 million, respectively, at the date of acquisition. The acquisition of APSB resulted in goodwill and core deposit intangibles of $62.8 million.
On October 26, 2000, a one million-share stock buyback program of the Corporation's common stock was announced. As of December 31, 2001, 348,700 shares have been repurchased under this program at a cost of $11.9 million, or an average price of $34.10 per share.
The Corporation paid dividends of $0.74 per share of common stock in 2001 and $0.70 per share of common stock in 2000. On January 24, 2002, the Board of Directors authorized a regular quarterly cash dividend on common stock at an increased rate of $0.195 per share to shareholders of record on February 6, 2002 payable on February 19, 2002. This reflects a 5.4% increase over the quarterly dividend paid in 2001.
A-4
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Operations Summary
Following is an operations summary on a fully taxable-equivalent basis for the years ended December 31 for each of the last five years.
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dollars per thousands, except per share amounts |
Year Ended 2001 |
Year Ended 2000 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount |
% |
Amount |
% |
1999 |
1998 |
1997 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income (1) | $ | 638,914 | ($ | 19,960 | ) | (3 | ) | $ | 658,874 | $ | 177,761 | 37 | $ | 481,113 | $ | 434,512 | $ | 367,505 | |||||||||
Interest expense | 191,094 | (48,678 | ) | (20 | ) | 239,772 | 91,331 | 62 | 148,441 | 130,278 | 104,328 | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest income | 447,820 | 28,718 | 7 | 419,102 | 86,430 | 26 | 332,672 | 304,234 | 263,177 | ||||||||||||||||||
Provision for credit losses | 35,000 | 13,500 | 63 | 21,500 | 21,500 | NM | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest income | 132,384 | 22,900 | 21 | 109,484 | 22,272 | 26 | 87,212 | 67,684 | 53,418 | ||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest expense: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Staff expense | 170,364 | 10,582 | 7 | 159,782 | 25,847 | 19 | 133,935 | 114,965 | 97,634 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other expense | 143,031 | 8,043 | 6 | 134,988 | 27,120 | 25 | 107,868 | 96,366 | 84,123 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total | 313,395 | 18,625 | 6 | 294,770 | 52,967 | 22 | 241,803 | 211,331 | 181,757 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes | 231,809 | 19,493 | 9 | 212,316 | 34,235 | 19 | 178,081 | 160,587 | 134,838 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income taxes | 71,973 | 3,903 | 6 | 68,070 | 8,763 | 15 | 59,307 | 53,796 | 45,196 | ||||||||||||||||||
Less: adjustments (1) | 13,666 | 1,080 | 9 | 12,586 | 1,919 | 18 | 10,667 | 10,563 | 9,509 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 146,170 | $ | 14,510 | 11 | $ | 131,660 | $ | 23,553 | 22 | $ | 108,107 | $ | 96,228 | $ | 80,133 | |||||||||||
Net income per share, diluted | $ | 2.96 | $ | 0.24 | 9 | $ | 2.72 | $ | 0.42 | 18 | $ | 2.30 | $ | 2.00 | $ | 1.68 | |||||||||||
Net Interest Income
Net interest income is the difference between interest income (which includes yield-related loan fees) and interest expense. Net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis expressed as a percentage of average total earning assets is referred to as the net interest margin, which represents the average net effective yield on earning assets.
A-5
The following table shows average balances, interest income and yields for the last five years.
|
2001 |
2000 |
||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dollars in thousands |
Average Balance |
Interest income/ expense (1) |
Average interest rate |
Average Balance |
Interest income/ expense (1) |
Average interest rate |
||||||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||
Earning assets (2) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial (3) | $ | 3,127,252 | $ | 246,332 | 7.88 | % | $ | 3,189,457 | $ | 294,598 | 9.24 | % | ||||||||
Real estate mortgage | 1,582,853 | 130,268 | 8.23 | 1,336,443 | 123,444 | 9.24 | ||||||||||||||
Residential first mortgage | 1,417,443 | 102,036 | 7.20 | 1,235,106 | 89,973 | 7.28 | ||||||||||||||
Real estate construction | 513,184 | 38,676 | 7.54 | 409,281 | 42,362 | 10.35 | ||||||||||||||
Installment | 72,583 | 6,844 | 9.43 | 66,047 | 6,118 | 9.26 | ||||||||||||||
Total loans (4) | 6,713,315 | 524,156 | 7.81 | 6,236,334 | 556,495 | 8.92 | ||||||||||||||
State and municipal investment securities | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||
Taxable investment securities | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||
Securities available-for-sale | 1,656,028 | 109,506 | 6.61 | 1,350,971 | 95,950 | 7.10 | ||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements | 107,247 | 3,298 | 3.08 | 46,298 | 2,809 | 6.07 | ||||||||||||||
Trading account securities | 43,652 | 1,954 | 4.48 | 65,281 | 3,620 | 5.55 | ||||||||||||||
Total earning assets | 8,520,242 | 638,914 | 7.50 | 7,698,884 | 658,874 | 8.56 | ||||||||||||||
Allowance for credit losses | (136,981 | ) | (139,701 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks | 399,978 | 341,947 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other nonearning assets | 545,273 | 524,999 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 9,328,512 | $ | 8,426,129 | ||||||||||||||||
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest checking accounts | 554,641 | 2,114 | 0.38 | $ | 540,765 | 2,780 | 0.51 | |||||||||||||
Money market accounts | 1,552,404 | 44,162 | 2.84 | 1,317,186 | 47,404 | 3.60 | ||||||||||||||
Savings deposits | 247,280 | 7,064 | 2.86 | 237,024 | 10,040 | 4.24 | ||||||||||||||
Time depositsunder $100,000 | 245,350 | 11,397 | 4.65 | 260,115 | 14,770 | 5.68 | ||||||||||||||
Time deposit$100,000 and over | 1,469,874 | 68,513 | 4.66 | 1,377,406 | 80,733 | 5.86 | ||||||||||||||
Total interestbearing deposits | 4,069,549 | 133,250 | 3.27 | 3,732,496 | 155,727 | 4.17 | ||||||||||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements | 326,889 | 13,218 | 4.04 | 264,013 | 16,269 | 6.16 | ||||||||||||||
Other borrowings | 990,779 | 44,626 | 4.50 | 1,047,622 | 67,776 | 6.47 | ||||||||||||||
Total interestbearing liabilities | 5,387,217 | 191,094 | 3.55 | 5,044,131 | 239,772 | 4.75 | ||||||||||||||
Noninterestbearing deposits | 2,998,435 | 2,602,350 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities | 117,516 | 112,030 | ||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders' equity | 825,344 | 667,618 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity | $ | 9,328,512 | $ | 8,426,129 | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest spread | 3.95 | % | 3.81 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Fully taxable equivalent net interest income | $ | 447,820 | $ | 419,102 | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin | 5.26 | % | 5.44 | % | ||||||||||||||||
A-6
1999 |
1998 |
1997 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average Balance |
Interest income/ expense (1) |
Average interest rate |
Average Balance |
Interest income/ expense (1) |
Average interest rate |
Average Balance |
Interest income/ expense (1) |
Average interest rate |
|||||||||||||||
$ |
2,560,701 |
$ |
219,460 |
8.57 |
% |
$ |
2,186,395 |
$ |
195,288 |
8.93 |
% |
$ |
1,623,851 |
$ |
150,528 |
9.27 |
% |
||||||
851,396 | 75,956 | 8.92 | 755,752 | 71,976 | 9.52 | 647,658 | 63,662 | 9.83 | |||||||||||||||
1,069,522 | 77,330 | 7.23 | 1,028,966 | 76,874 | 7.47 | 942,381 | 73,199 | 7.77 | |||||||||||||||
288,084 | 27,496 | 9.54 | 191,782 | 20,874 | 10.88 | 127,867 | 15,004 | 11.73 | |||||||||||||||
52,551 | 5,208 | 9.91 | 50,958 | 5,044 | 9.90 | 46,027 | 5,035 | 10.94 | |||||||||||||||
4,822,254 | 405,450 | 8.41 | 4,213,853 | 370,056 | 8.78 | 3,387,784 | 307,428 | 9.07 | |||||||||||||||
| | | 103,491 | 7,044 | 6.81 | 105,325 | 7,400 | 7.03 | |||||||||||||||
| | | 100,350 | 6,260 | 6.24 | 117,874 | 7,683 | 6.52 | |||||||||||||||
1,050,716 | 70,205 | 6.68 | 638,505 | 44,057 | 6.90 | 606,358 | 40,822 | 6.73 | |||||||||||||||
44,637 |
2,381 |
5.33 |
66,379 |
3,458 |
5.21 |
23,485 |
1,301 |
5.54 |
|||||||||||||||
67,411 | 3,077 | 4.56 | 65,319 | 3,637 | 5.57 | 49,627 | 2,871 | 5.79 | |||||||||||||||
5,985,018 | 481,113 | 8.04 | 5,187,897 | 434,512 | 8.38 | 4,290,453 | 367,505 | 8.57 | |||||||||||||||
(139,973 | ) | (137,257 | ) | (136,587 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
295,432 | 310,201 | 327,013 | |||||||||||||||||||||
348,357 | 272,988 | 223,007 | |||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 6,488,834 | $ | 5,633,829 | $ | 4,703,886 | ||||||||||||||||||
$ |
411,350 |
2,065 |
0.50 |
$ |
385,075 |
3,751 |
0.97 |
$ |
366,997 |
3,677 |
1.00 |
||||||||||||
989,888 | 29,385 | 2.97 | 892,765 | 27,018 | 3.03 | 797,902 | 23,995 | 3.01 | |||||||||||||||
200,579 | 7,547 | 3.76 | 169,606 | 6,167 | 3.64 | 169,030 | 5,701 | 3.37 | |||||||||||||||
202,387 | 9,658 | 4.77 | 201,152 | 10,428 | 5.18 | 222,972 | 11,414 | 5.12 | |||||||||||||||
928,692 | 44,559 | 4.80 | 761,048 | 39,873 | 5.24 | 534,431 | 28,502 | 5.33 | |||||||||||||||
2,732,896 | 93,214 | 3.41 | 2,409,646 | 87,237 | 3.62 | 2,091,332 | 73,289 | 3.50 | |||||||||||||||
232,350 |
11,019 |
4.74 |
209,982 |
10,821 |
5.15 |
222,617 |
11,731 |
5.27 |
|||||||||||||||
818,809 | 44,208 | 5.40 | 553,153 | 32,220 | 5.82 | 338,930 | 19,308 | 5.70 | |||||||||||||||
3,784,055 | 148,441 | 3.92 | 3,172,781 | 130,278 | 4.11 | 2,652,879 | 104,328 | 3.93 | |||||||||||||||
2,076,904 | 1,857,956 | 1,522,736 | |||||||||||||||||||||
63,784 | 64,666 | 55,428 | |||||||||||||||||||||
564,091 | 538,426 | 472,843 | |||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 6,488,834 | $ | 5,633,829 | $ | 4,703,886 | ||||||||||||||||||
4.12 | % | 4.27 | % | 4.64 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
$ | 332,672 | $ | 304,234 | $ | 263,177 | ||||||||||||||||||
5.56 | % | 5.86 | % | 6.13 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
A-7
Taxable-equivalent net interest income totaled $447.8 million in 2001, an increase of $28.7 million, or 6.9%, from 2000. The increase in net interest income was due to strong average loan and average core deposit growth. Interest income recovered on non accrual and charged-off loans included above was $4.3 million in 2001, compared with $4.0 million for 2000. Also included in 2001 was $15.0 million from the receipt of net settlements of interest rate risk management instruments compared to $2.7 million paid on net settlements of interest rate risk management instruments in 2000.
The fully taxable-equivalent net interest margin in 2001 was 5.26%, compared with 5.44% for 2000. The decrease of 18 basis points reflects the decline in of the interest rate environment, led by the Federal Reserve Board's rate reduction of 475 basis points since the beginning of 2001.
Net interest income is impacted by the volume and rate of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The following table shows changes in net interest income between 2001 and 2000 as well as between 2000 and 1999 broken down between volume and rate.
Changes in Net Interest Income
|
2000 vs 1999 |
2001 vs 2000 |
|||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Increase (decrease) due to |
|
Increase (decrease) due to |
|
|||||||||||||||
Dollars in thousands fully taxable equivlent basis |
Net increase (decrease) |
Net increase (decrease) |
|||||||||||||||||
Volume |
Rate |
Volume |
Rate |
||||||||||||||||
Interest earned on: | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits | |||||||||||||||||||
in other banks | $ | 399 | $ | 36 | $ | 435 | $ | 11 | $ | | $ | 11 | |||||||
Loans | 40,391 | (72,730 | ) | (32,339 | ) | 125,162 | 25,883 | 151,045 | |||||||||||
Securities available-for-sale | 19,351 | (6,231 | ) | 13,120 | 20,862 | 4,871 | 25,733 | ||||||||||||
Trading account securities | (1,043 | ) | (622 | ) | (1,665 | ) | (88 | ) | 632 | 544 | |||||||||
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements | 2,370 | (1,881 | ) | 489 | 91 | 337 | 428 | ||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets | 61,468 | (81,428 | ) | (19,960 | ) | 146,038 | 31,723 | 177,761 | |||||||||||
Interest paid on: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Interest checking | (348 | ) | (318 | ) | $ | (666 | ) | 672 | 43 | 715 | |||||||||
Money market deposits | 7,689 | (10,931 | ) | (3,242 | ) | 10,977 | 7,042 | 18,019 | |||||||||||
Savings deposits | 3,098 | (6,074 | ) | (2,976 | ) | 1,464 | 1,029 | 2,493 | |||||||||||
Other time deposits | 4,346 | (19,939 | ) | (15,593 | ) | 27,804 | 13,482 | 41,286 | |||||||||||
Other borrowings | 386 | (26,587 | ) | (26,201 | ) | 15,235 | 13,583 | 28,818 | |||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities | 15,171 | (63,849 | ) | (48,678 | ) | 56,152 | 35,179 | 91,331 | |||||||||||
$ | 46,297 | $ | (17,579 | ) | $ | 28,718 | $ | 89,886 | $ | (3,456 | ) | $ | 86,430 | ||||||
Based on events during the current quarter and economic forecast for the remainder of this year, management expects the net interest margin for 2002 will approximate the net interest margin of 5.26% reported for 2001, exclusive of any impact of acquisitions.
Average loans rose to $6,713.3 million in 2001, an increase of 7.6% over the prior year. Average relationship loans increased $782.7 million, or 13.5% compared with $5,805.0 million in 2000. The year-over-year growth in average relationship loans was driven primarily by increases in real estate mortgage, residential first mortgage, commercial and construction loans. Compared with prior year averages, real estate mortgage loans rose 18.4% to $1,582.9 million from $1,336.4 million; residential first mortgage loans rose 14.8% to $1,417.4 million from $1,235.1 million; commercial loans rose 8.8% to $3,001.7 million from $2,758.1 million; and construction loans rose 25.4% to $513.2 million from
A-8
$409.3 million. Conversely, average syndicated non-relationship loans fell to $125.6 million during the year, down significantly from $431.3 million for the prior year. This was consistent with the Corporation's objective of reducing its exposure to syndicated non-relationship loans.
Management anticipates average loan growth will be in the 8.0% to 13.0% range for 2002, exclusive of any impact of acquisitions.
Average securities available-for-sale increased $305.1 million, or 22.6%, between 2000 and 2001 due, in part, to the investing activities of the registered investment subsidiary which reinvests principal and interest payments on loans in securities available-for-sale.
Total average core deposits rose to $5,598.1 million, an increase of 12.9% over 2000. Average core deposits represented 79.2% of the total average deposit base for the year. Average interest-bearing core deposits increased to $2,599.7 million in 2001 from $2,355.1 million in 2000, an increase of $244.6 million, or 10.4%. Average noninterest-bearing deposits increased to $2,998.4 million in 2001 from $2,602.4 million in 2000, an increase of $396.1 million, or 15.2%. These increases resulted from the Company's increased sales of cash management products and a reduction in the earnings credit on analyzed deposit accounts resulting from lower interest rates. Average time deposits in denominations of $100,000 or more increased $92.5 million or, 6.7%, between 2000 and 2001.
Average deposit growth in 2002, compared with 2001, is expected to be in the 8.0% to 12.0% range, exclusive of any impact of acquisitions.
For 2000, taxable-equivalent net interest income totaled $419.1 million, an increase of $86.4 million, or 26.0%, from 1999. The increase in net interest income was due to strong average loan and average core deposit growth which included the acquisitions of APSB and Pacific Bank, and a higher average prime rate compared to prior years, partially offset by a higher cost of funds.
Average loans rose to $6,236.3 million for the year 2000, an increase of 29.3% over the prior year. Year-over-year loan growth was driven primarily by increases in commercial loans and real estate mortgage loans. Compared with 1999, commercial loan average balances rose 24.6% to $3,189.5 million from $2,560.7 million. This average loan growth was achieved despite a $48.9 million decrease in average syndicated non-relationship loans during the year. Real estate mortgage loan averages rose 57.0% to $1,336.4 million from $851.4 million, compared with the prior year. The remaining loan categories also contributed to the increase in average loan growth over the prior year, but to a lesser extent.
Average securities available-for-sale increased $300.3 million, or 28.6%, between 1999 and 2000 due, in part, to the investing activities of the registered investment subsidiary which reinvests principal and interest payments on loans in securities available-for-sale.
Average core deposits rose to $4,957.4 million, an increase of 27.7% over 1999. Average core deposits represented 78.3% of the total average deposit base for the year. Average interest-bearing core deposits increased to $2,355.1 million in 2000 from $1,804.2 million in 1999, an increase of $550.9 million, or 30.5%. Average noninterest-bearing deposits increased to $2,602.4 million in 2000 from $2,076.9 million in 1999, an increase of $525.5 million, or 25.3%. These increases resulted from the Company's increased marketing efforts, the nature of the Company's relationship business which encourages clients to maintain balances as compensation for banking services, as well as from the acquisitions of APSB and Pacific Bank. Average time deposits in denominations of $100,000 or more increased $448.7 million or, 48.3%, between 1999 and 2000.
Provision for Credit Losses
The provision for credit losses primarily reflects the levels of net loan charge-offs and nonaccrual loans, changes in the economic environment during the period, as well as management's ongoing
A-9
assessment of the credit quality and growth of the loan portfolio. In 2001, 2000 and 1999, net charge-offs totaled $27.6 million, $30.1 million and $4.7 million, respectively. In each of these same years, nonaccrual loans totaled $38.6 million, $62.0 million and $25.3 million, respectively.
The Company recorded a provision for credit losses of $35.0 million in 2001, $21.5 million in 2000 and none in 1999. See "Balance Sheet AnalysisAsset QualityAllowance for Credit Losses."
The provision for credit losses to be taken in 2002 will reflect management's assessment of the above factors, as well as changes in the economic environment during this period. Based on its current assessment, management anticipates that a provision for credit losses for all of 2002 could fall within the $35.0 million to $50.0 million range, exclusive of the impact of any acquisitions.
Noninterest Income
The Company continues to emphasize fee income growth. Noninterest income in 2001 totaled $132.4 million, an increase of $22.9 million, or 20.9%, from 2000 which increased $22.3 million, or 25.6%, from 1999. Noninterest income represented 23.4% of total revenues in 2001, as compared with 21.2% and 21.3% in 2000 and 1999, respectively.
A breakdown of noninterest income by category is reflected below.
Analysis of Changes in Noninterest Income
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dollars in millions |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
2001 |
Amount |
% |
2000 |
Amount |
% |
1999 |
||||||||||||||
Trust and investment fee revenue | $ | 58.6 | $ | 11.3 | 23.9 | $ | 47.3 | $ | 9.4 | 24.8 | $ | 37.9 | ||||||||
Cash management and deposit transaction charges | 30.9 | 8.0 | 34.9 | 22.9 | 4.8 | 26.5 | 18.1 | |||||||||||||
International services | 15.0 | | | 15.0 | 5.0 | 50.6 | 10.0 | |||||||||||||
Bank owned life insurance | 2.9 | 0.3 | 11.5 | 2.6 | 0.3 | 13.0 | 2.3 | |||||||||||||
All other income | 20.3 | 1.6 | 8.6 | 18.7 | 5.6 | 42.7 | 13.1 | |||||||||||||
Total core | 127.7 | 21.2 | 19.9 | 106.5 | 25.1 | 30.8 | 81.4 | |||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of loans and assets/debt repurchase | 1.4 | 1.5 | N/M | (0.1 | ) | (2.2 | ) | (104.8 | ) | 2.1 | ||||||||||
Gain on sale of securities | 3.3 | 0.2 | 6.5 | 3.1 | (0.6 | ) | (16.2 | ) | 3.7 | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 132.4 | $ | 22.9 | 20.9 | $ | 109.5 | $ | 22.3 | 25.6 | $ | 87.2 | ||||||||
Trust and Investment services income, which includes trust fees, commissions and markups on securities transactions with clients, and fees on mutual funds, increased in 2001, compared with 2000, by $11.3 million, or 23.9%. The increase was attributable to the acquisition of Reed, Conner & Birdwell, which closed at year-end 2000 and accounted for approximately 46% of the increase, and an increase in new business within City National Investments (CNI). Trust and investment fee revenue increased by $9.4 million, or 24.8% from 1999 to 2000, primarily due to higher commissions resulting from higher balances in mutual funds, and expanded number of mutual funds available, new investment products and a higher number of affluent clients. At December 31, 2001, the Company had $18.8 billion under management or administration which included $7.7 billion under management, compared with $18.0 billion and $6.7 billion, respectively, at December 31, 2000.
Cash management and deposit transaction fees increased $8.0 million, or 34.9%, compared with a 26.5% increase in 2000. The increase in 2001 was the result of higher sales of new online cash management products and a reduction in the earnings credit on analyzed deposit accounts resulting from lower interest rates which resulted in certain clients paying fees for services rather than paying the bank with deposit balances. The increase in 2000 was the result of deposits assumed in the acquisitions
A-10
of APSB and Pacific Bank and strong internal growth in deposits attributable to increased sales of cash management products.
Despite the introduction of online foreign exchange and online letters of credit products, international services fee income of $15.0 million for 2001 was unchanged from the prior year due primarily to the decline in the international trade market. For 2000, international services fee income increased $5.0 million, or 50.6%, due to an increased client base and the acquisition of Pacific Bank which resulted in increased foreign exchange fees and, to a lesser extent, an increase in fee income associated with letters of credit and standby letters of credit.
Other income increased $1.6 million in 2001 over 2000, or 8.6%, primarily as the result of higher loan documentation and appraisal fees. Other income increased $5.6 million in 2000 over 1999, or 42.7%, primarily as the result of higher fee income earned on participating mortgage loans.
Gains on the sale of securities available-for-sale in 2001 totaled $3.3 million compared with $3.1 million and $3.7 million for 2000 and 1999, respectively.
Management expects growth in noninterest income to range from 7.0% to 10.0% for 2002, exclusive of any impact of acquisitions such as occurred in 2001 from the Reed, Conner & Birdwell acquisition which accounted for approximately one quarter of the 20.9% increase in noninterest income reported for the year. In addition, management does not anticipate repurchasing debt in 2002 and expects that a more stable interest rate environment will result in a reduction in the growth rate of cash management and deposit transaction fees in 2002. On the other hand, management expects a gain of $2.0 million from the sale of assets in early 2002.
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expense was $313.4 million in 2001, an increase of $18.6 million, or 6.3%, from 2000 which increased $53.0 million, or 21.9%, from 1999. The current year-over-year increase in expense was primarily the result of the Company's growth, including expenses resulting from the acquisition of Reed, Conner & Birdwell. A breakdown of noninterest expense by category is reflected below.
Analysis of Changes in Noninterest Expense
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dollars in millions |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
2001 |
Amount |
% |
2000 |
Amount |
% |
1999 |
||||||||||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits | $ | 170.4 | $ | 10.6 | 6.6 | $ | 159.8 | $ | 25.9 | 19.3 | $ | 133.9 | ||||||||||
All Other: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Net occupancy of premises | 26.4 | 2.0 | 8.2 | 24.4 | 5.4 | 28.4 | 19.0 | |||||||||||||||
Professional | 24.6 | 1.5 | 6.5 | 23.1 | 2.3 | 11.1 | 20.8 | |||||||||||||||
Information services | 16.6 | 2.5 | 17.7 | 14.1 | 1.8 | 14.6 | 12.3 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation | 13.7 | 0.7 | 5.4 | 13.0 | 1.8 | 16.1 | 11.2 | |||||||||||||||
Amortization of goodwill | 12.9 | 1.7 | 15.2 | 11.2 | 6.0 | 115.4 | 5.2 | |||||||||||||||
Marketing and advertising | 12.1 | (0.9 | ) | (6.9 | ) | 13.0 | 2.6 | 25.0 | 10.4 | |||||||||||||
Office supplies | 9.4 | (0.3 | ) | (3.1 | ) | 9.7 | 1.5 | 18.3 | 8.2 | |||||||||||||
Amortization of core deposit intangibles | 5.6 | 0.2 | 3.7 | 5.4 | 1.3 | 31.7 | 4.1 | |||||||||||||||
Equipment | 2.2 | (0.3 | ) | (12.0 | ) | 2.5 | 0.3 | 13.6 | 2.2 | |||||||||||||
Other operating | 19.5 | 0.9 | 4.8 | 18.6 | 4.1 | 28.3 | 14.5 | |||||||||||||||
Total all other | 143.0 | 8.0 | 5.9 | 135.0 | 27.1 | 25.1 | 107.9 | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 313.4 | $ | 18.6 | 6.3 | $ | 294.8 | $ | 53.0 | 21.9 | 241.8 | |||||||||||
A-11
Salaries and employee benefit expense increased 6.6% in 2001 compared with a 19.3% increase in 2000. On a full-time equivalent basis, staff levels have increased to 2,084 at December 31, 2001 from 2,034 at December 31, 2000. As described in "Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements", the Company applies APB Opinion No. 25 in accounting for its stock options plans and, accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized for its stock options in the financial statements.
The remaining expense categories increased $8.0 million, or 5.9%, between 2000 and 2001. The remaining expense categories increased $27.1 million, or 25.1%, between 1999 and 2000. Marketing and advertising expense increased as the Company continued its marketing and advertising program to increase its visibility in expanded market areas. Other increases were primarily related to the acquisitions of APSB and Pacific Bank. Other expense in 2000 included $1.3 million of integration expenses relating to Pacific Bank, all of which were paid in 2000. In addition, the remaining integration expenses of APSB from 1999 were paid in 2000.
On a new GAAP basis, excluding the amortization of goodwill in both 2001 and 2002, management currently anticipates that 2002 noninterest expense will be 3.0% to 5.0% higher than 2001, exclusive of any impact of acquisitions.
Income Taxes
The 2001 effective tax rate was 33.0% compared with 34.1% in 2000 and 35.4% in 1999. The lower tax rate in 2001 was due primarily to the formation of a real estate investment trust subsidiary for capital-raising activities during the second quarter of the year. The reduced rate in 2000 compared to 1999 resulted primarily from the Company's registered investment company ("RIC") which was formed in 2000. The effective rates during all periods differed from the applicable statutory federal tax rate due to various factors including state taxes, tax benefits from investments in affordable housing partnerships, tax exempt income including interest on bank owned life insurance, and amortization of nondeductible goodwill.
The Company's RIC has filed Form N8-F seeking de-registration in the first quarter of 2002. Management currently anticipates that the process of de-registration will be completed by the end of the second quarter of 2002. Management believes the Company currently has various alternative capital raising sources available to fund its operations in future periods and does not believe that the impact of the de-registration of the Company's RIC will have a material impact on the Company's financial condition or liquidity.
In February 2002, a legislative tax bill, SB 1660 was introduced in the State of California Senate to retroactively repeal back to 1993, the tax benefit of dividends paid by a RIC to a California corporate shareholder which is unitary with the RIC. In March 2002, the Franchise Tax Board, when first considering this matter, directed its staff to gather more information concerning this proposal. While staff of the legislative author of SB 1660 indicated that the provisions of the bill applicable to a RIC would be stricken from the bill, such a change to the bill cannot happen without legislative action until at least April 1, 2002 and there is no assurance of such an amendment. The Company believes, based on opinions of independent counsel, that retroactive repeal will not prevail even if the proposal is not excluded from SB 1660.
The Company's tax returns are open for audits by the Internal Revenue Service back to 1998 and by the Franchise Tax Board of the State of California back to 1996. From time-to-time, there may be differences in opinions with the respect to tax treatment accorded transactions. When, and if, such differences occur and become probable and estimable, a liability will be recognized.
As indicated above, the effective tax rate continues to be impacted by the nature of the business and applicable tax strategies. Management currently anticipates its effective tax rate may fall within a range of 32.0% to 34.0% for 2002, exclusive of any impact of acquisitions.
A-12
BALANCE SHEET ANALYSIS
Capital
At December 31, 2001, the Corporation's and the Bank's Tier 1 capital, which is comprised of common shareholders' equity as modified by certain regulatory adjustments, amounted to $700.9 million and $632.4 million, respectively. At December 31, 2000, the Corporation's and the Bank's Tier 1 capital amounted to $555.5 million and $532.6 million, respectively. The increase from December 31, 2000 resulted from retention of 2001 earnings, the issuance by City National Bank of $150.0 million of 6.75%, ten year subordinated notes which qualifies as Tier II capital and the issuance of $3.4 million of preferred stock by a subsidiary of the bank which qualifies as Tier 1 capital and the exercise of stock options, offset by dividends paid and amounts related to shares repurchased. See "Overview."
The following table presents the regulatory standards for well capitalized institutions and the capital ratios for the Corporation and the Bank at December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999.
|
|
December 31, |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Regulatory Well Capitalized Standards |
||||||||
|
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
||||||
City National Corporation | |||||||||
Tier 1 leverage | 4.00 | % | 7.26 | % | 6.49 | % | 6.73 | % | |
Tier 1 risk-based capital | 6.00 | 9.32 | 7.84 | 7.88 | |||||
Total risk-based capital | 10.00 | 14.08 | 10.85 | 11.21 | |||||
City National Bank |
|||||||||
Tier 1 leverage | 4.00 | % | 6.59 | % | 6.23 | % | 6.30 | % | |
Tier 1 risk-based capital | 6.00 | 8.48 | 7.55 | 7.40 | |||||
Total risk-based capital | 10.00 | 13.28 | 10.57 | 10.75 |
Liquidity Management
Liquidity risk results from the mismatching of asset and liability cash flows. Funds for this purpose can be obtained in cash markets, by borrowing, or by selling assets.
The objective of liquidity management is the ability to maintain cash flow adequate to fund the Company's operations and meet obligations and other commitments on a timely and cost effective basis. The Company achieves this objective through the selection of asset and liability maturity mixes that it believes best meet the needs of the Company. The Company's liquidity position is enhanced by its ability to raise additional funds as needed in the money markets.
The Company's core deposit base in recent years provided the majority of the Company's funding requirements. This relatively stable and low cost source of funds has, along with shareholders' equity, provided 69% and 67% of funding for average total assets in 2001 and 2000, respectively.
A significant portion of remaining funding of average total assets is provided by short-term federal fund purchases and sales of securities under repurchase agreements. This funding source, on average, totaled $326.9 million and $264.0 million in 2001 and 2000, respectively. Additionally, the Company decreased its funding from other borrowings, primarily Federal Home Loan Bank advances, to $990.8 million on average in 2001 from $1,047.6 million in 2000.
Liquidity is also provided by assets such as federal funds sold, securities purchased under resale agreements, and trading account securities which may be immediately converted to cash at minimal cost. The aggregate of these assets averaged $150.9 million during 2001 compared with $111.6 million in 2000. Liquidity is also provided by the portfolio of securities available-for-sale which totaled $1,814.8 million and $1,547.8 million at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
A-13
The unpledged portion of securities available-for-sale at December 31, 2001 totaled $1,429.9 million and could be sold or be available as collateral for borrowing. Maturing loans also provide liquidity, and $2,812.3 million, or 39.3% of the Company's loans are scheduled to mature in 2002.
Asset/Liability Management
The principal objective of asset/liability management is to maximize net interest margin subject to margin volatility and liquidity constraints. Margin volatility results when the rate reset (or repricing) characteristics of assets are materially different from those of the Company's liabilities. Management chooses asset/liability strategies that promote stable earnings and reliable funding. Interest rate risk and funding positions are kept within limits established by the Board of Directors to ensure that risk taking is not excessive and that liquidity is properly managed.
The Company has established three primary measurement processes to quantify and manage exposure to interest rate risk: net interest income simulation modeling, present value of equity analysis, and gap analysis. Net interest income simulations are used to identify the direction and severity of interest rate risk exposure across a twelve and twenty-four month forecast horizon. Present value of equity calculations are used to estimate the theoretical price sensitivity of shareholders' equity to changes in interest rates. Gap analysis provides insight into structural mismatches of asset and liability repricing characteristics.
Net Interest Income Simulation: The Company's net interest margin is affected by the level of interest rates and by the shape of the yield curve. The yield curve depicts market interest rates as a function of maturity. The Company has a large portfolio of rate sensitive commercial loans that are funded in part by rate stable core deposits. As a result, the Company is generally asset sensitive; net interest margin increases when interest rates are increasing and decreases when rates are declining. The Company uses a simulation model to estimate the severity of this risk and to develop mitigation strategies. It captures the dynamic nature of the balance sheet by anticipating probable on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet responses to different interest rate scenarios over the course of twelve and twenty-four month forecasting horizons. Model assumptions are updated periodically and are reviewed by the Asset/Liability Management Committee (ALCO). The Board of Directors has adopted limits within which interest rate exposure must be contained. Within these broader limits, ALCO sets management guidelines to further contain interest rate risk exposure.
The simulation indicates that net interest income would not be substantially adversely impacted by changes in interest rates. A rapid and sustained two-percentage point decline in interest rates would result in a decrease in projected net interest income of approximately 1.5% over the twenty-four month horizon. This 1.5% at-risk amount at December 31, 2001 is an improvement from the 4.0% at-risk amount at the beginning of 2001. A rapid and sustained two-percentage point increase in rates would cause net interest income to improve by about 4.7% compared to slightly over 2.0% at the beginning of 2001. The changes are within the ALCO management guideline of 5.0%. The Company continues to use a variety of tools to manage its asset sensitivity.
Present Value of Equity: The present value of equity ("PVE") model is used to evaluate the vulnerability of the market value of shareholders' equity to changes in interest rates. The PVE model calculates the expected cash flow of all of the Company's assets and liabilities under sharply higher and lower interest rate scenarios. The present value of these cash flows is calculated by discounting them using the interest rates for that scenario. The difference between the present value of assets and the present value of liabilities in each scenario is the PVE. PVE will vary depending on the timing of expected cash flow, the level of interest rates, and the shape of the yield curve. The assumptions governing these relationships are the same as those used in the net interest income simulation. They
A-14
are updated periodically and are reviewed by ALCO. The Board of Directors has adopted limits within which this exposure must be contained.
The model indicates that PVE is only slightly vulnerable to an increase in interest rates. A two-percentage point increase in interest rates results in a 3.8% decline in PVE. A two percentage point decrease in interest rates results in a 1.2% appreciation in PVE. These results reflect the increase in asset sensitivity experienced over the previous twelve months.
Gap Analysis: The gap analysis is based on the contractual cash flows of all asset and liability balances on the Company's books. The contractual life of these balances may differ substantially from their expected lives however. For example, checking accounts are subject to immediate withdrawal. Experience suggests that these accounts will have an average life of several years. Also, certain loans (such as first mortgages) are subject to prepayment. The gap analysis reflects the contractual cash flows adjusted for anticipated client behavior. It may be used to identify periods in which there is a substantial mismatch between assets and liabilities. These mismatches can be moderated by investments or off-balance sheet derivatives transaction strategies. The Board of Directors has adopted limits within which the ratio of rate-sensitive assets to rate-sensitive liabilities must be contained. The most recent gap analysis indicates that the Company's one-year cumulative ratio of rate-sensitive assets to rate-sensitive liabilities is 103% and is within the limits set by the Board of Directors.
The following table presents in tabular form information about the Company's financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. The table presents principal cash flows and related average interest rates by expected re-pricing or maturity dates and fair values as of December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000. Expected re-pricing or maturities of assets are contractual. Interest-bearing demand and savings deposits are included in the earliest maturity category, even though withdrawal of these balances is not contractually required and may not actually occur during that period. Average interest rates on variable rate instruments are based upon the Company's interest rate forecast. Actual re-pricing or maturities of interest-sensitive assets and liabilities could vary substantially from expectations if different assumptions are used or if actual experience differs from the assumptions used.
A-15
Interest-Sensitive Financial Instrument Maturities
December 31, 2001
Dollars in millions |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
Thereafter |
Total |
Fair Value |
|||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Interest-sensitive assets: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale securities | $ | 334.7 | $ | 94.7 | $ | 151.0 | $ | 188.9 | $ | 130.3 | $ | 915.2 | $ | 1,814.8 | $ | 1,814.8 | |||||||||||
Average interest rate | 5.98 | % | 4.79 | % | 6.39 | % | 6.15 | % | 5.86 | % | 6.19 | % | 6.06 | % | |||||||||||||
Loans | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | 2,519.3 | 306.7 | 97.0 | 53.3 | 61.9 | 209.1 | 3,247.3 | 3,160.9 | |||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 5.58 | % | 5.97 | % | 6.57 | % | 6.71 | % | 6.51 | % | 5.41 | % | 5.67 | % | |||||||||||||
Real estate mortgage | 887.7 | 56.2 | 67.1 | 46.6 | 62.9 | 547.6 | 1,668.1 | 1,665.3 | |||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 6.45 | % | 7.73 | % | 8.05 | % | 7.99 | % | 8.09 | % | 7.99 | % | 7.12 | % | |||||||||||||
Residential first mortgage | 27.2 | 27.4 | 29.2 | 33.3 | 36.5 | 1,433.7 | 1,587.3 | 1,588.6 | |||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 6.88 | % | 6.81 | % | 6.81 | % | 6.85 | % | 6.78 | % | 6.89 | % | 6.88 | % | |||||||||||||
Real estate construction | 573.3 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 8.4 | 586.1 | 576.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 5.18 | % | 13.23 | % | 9.12 | % | 7.51 | % | 6.39 | % | 7.72 | % | 5.24 | % | |||||||||||||
Installment | 17.2 | 9.2 | 6.7 | 4.6 | 3.0 | 29.7 | 70.4 | 66.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 11.01 | % | 8.76 | % | 8.58 | % | 8.40 | % | 8.15 | % | 8.22 | % | 9.14 | % | |||||||||||||
Total loans | 4,024.7 | 400.9 | 200.5 | 138.3 | 166.3 | 2,228.5 | 7,159.2 | 7,058.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-sensitive assets | $ | 4,359.4 | $ | 495.6 | $ | 351.5 | $ | 327.2 | $ | 296.6 | $ | 3,143.7 | $ | 8,974.0 | $ | 8,873.2 | |||||||||||
Interest-sensitive liabilities: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest checking | $ | 576.7 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 576.7 | $ | 576.7 | |||||||||||
Average interest rate | 0.25 | % | 0.25 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings | 240.4 | | | | | | 240.4 | 240.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 0.40 | % | 0.40 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Money market | 1,893.4 | | | | | | 1,893.4 | 1,893.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 1.45 | % | 1.45 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Time | 1,528.3 | 32.1 | 5.4 | 3.7 | 3.9 | 0.5 | 1,573.9 | 1,579.2 | |||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 3.12 | % | 4.09 | % | 4.44 | % | 5.40 | % | 4.36 | % | 6.06 | % | 3.16 | % | |||||||||||||
Total deposits | 4,238.8 | 32.1 | 5.4 | 3.7 | 3.9 | 0.5 | 4,284.4 | 4,289.7 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total borrowings | 953.0 | | 15.0 | | | 85.6 | 1,053.6 | 1,086.3 | |||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 3.33 | % | | 5.24 | % | | | 7.75 | % | 3.67 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest-sensitive liabilities | $ | 5,191.8 | $ | 32.1 | $ | 20.4 | $ | 3.7 | $ | 3.9 | $ | 86.1 | $ | 5,338.0 | $ | 5,376.0 | |||||||||||
A-16
Interest-Sensitive Financial Instrument Maturities
December 31, 2000
Dollars in millions |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
Thereafter |
Total |
Fair Value |
|||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Interest-sensitive assets: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale securities | $ | 484.8 | $ | 192.0 | $ | 92.3 | $ | 95.9 | $ | 80.1 | $ | 602.7 | $ | 1,547.8 | $ | 1,547.8 | |||||||||||
Average interest rate | 6.46 | % | 6.45 | % | 5.65 | % | 6.76 | % | 6.07 | % | 6.75 | % | 6.52 | % | |||||||||||||
Loans | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | 2,833.2 | 98.4 | 88.1 | 61.6 | 37.1 | 129.8 | 3,248.2 | 3,145.7 | |||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 8.95 | % | 7.24 | % | 7.24 | % | 7.10 | % | 6.78 | % | 5.71 | % | 8.62 | % | |||||||||||||
Real estate mortgage | 915.7 | 60.0 | 56.3 | 60.1 | 38.0 | 349.8 | 1,479.9 | 1,464.9 | |||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 9.43 | % | 8.76 | % | 8.36 | % | 8.19 | % | 8.09 | % | 8.17 | % | 8.97 | % | |||||||||||||
Residential first mortgage | 34.2 | 24.3 | 23.2 | 24.9 | 30.1 | 1,137.0 | 1,273.7 | 1,265.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 7.58 | % | 7.48 | % | 7.27 | % | 7.27 | % | 7.42 | % | 7.35 | % | 7.36 | % | |||||||||||||
Real estate construction | 436.1 | 4.9 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 7.5 | 452.3 | 446.6 | |||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 9.87 | % | 12.38 | % | 12.37 | % | 8.10 | % | 7.74 | % | 7.74 | % | 9.86 | % | |||||||||||||
Installment | 19.1 | 10.7 | 7.8 | 5.2 | 3.3 | 26.9 | 73.0 | 68.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 11.14 | % | 9.35 | % | 9.21 | % | 9.08 | % | 8.97 | % | 8.99 | % | 9.71 | % | |||||||||||||
Total loans | 4,238.3 | 198.3 | 177.4 | 152.7 | 109.4 | 1,651.0 | 6,527.1 | 6,391.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-sensitive assets | $ | 4,723.1 | $ | 390.3 | $ | 269.7 | $ | 248.6 | $ | 189.5 | $ | 2,253.7 | $ | 8,074.9 | $ | 7,939.6 | |||||||||||
Interest-sensitive liabilities: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest checking | $ | 619.3 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 619.3 | $ | 619.3 | |||||||||||
Average interest rate | 0.40 | % | 0.40 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings | 244.7 | | | | | | 244.7 | 244.7 | |||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 4.24 | % | 4.24 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Money market | 1,344.2 | | | | | | 1,344.2 | 1,344.2 | |||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 3.60 | % | 3.60 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Time | 1,786.9 | 119.7 | 11.2 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 0.5 | 1,924.2 | 1,925.9 | |||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 5.99 | % | 5.30 | % | 5.70 | % | 5.00 | % | 4.80 | % | | % | 6.03 | % | |||||||||||||
Total deposits | 3,995.1 | 119.7 | 11.2 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 0.5 | 4,132.4 | 4,134.1 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total borrowings | 608.4 | 40.0 | | 15.0 | | 123.6 | 787.0 | 790.0 | |||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 6.44 | % | 5.67 | % | | 5.2 | % | | 6.49 | % | 6.38 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total interest-sensitive liabilities | $ | 4,603.5 | $ | 159.7 | $ | 11.2 | $ | 18.0 | $ | 2.9 | $ | 124.1 | $ | 4,919.4 | $ | 4,924.1 | |||||||||||
The use of simple straight forward interest rate swaps to manage interest rate exposure as hedges of financial instruments results in the difference between fixed and floating rates paid or received being added to or reducing net interest income on an earned basis within a reporting period.
The use of interest rate swaps involves the risk of dealing with counterparties and their ability to meet contractual terms. These counterparties must receive appropriate credit approval before the Company enters into an interest rate contract. Notional principal amounts express the volume of these transactions, although the amounts potentially subject to credit and market risk are much smaller. At December 31, 2001, the Company's interest rate swaps were entered into as a hedge of the variability in interest cash flows generated from LIBOR based loans due to fluctuations in the LIBOR index or to convert fixed rate deposits and borrowings into floating rate liabilities.. As of January 1, 2001, the Company adopted SFAS No.133, "Accounting for Derivatives and Hedging Activities", as amended. At that date, the Company had $800.0 million of notional amount of interest rate swaps which had a fair value of $7.5 million. Of the $800.0 million of interest rate swaps, $450.0 million were fair value hedges of various fixed rate deposits and borrowings and $350.0 million were cash flow hedges related to periodic future interest payments on specific portions of a $1.2 billion variable rate LIBOR based loan portfolio. The positive mark-to-market on the fair value hedges resulted in the recognition of other assets and an increase in the hedged deposits and borrowings of $5.1 million as of January 1, 2001. The
A-17
positive mark-to-market on the cash flow hedges of variable rate loans resulted in the recognition of other assets and comprehensive income of $2.4 million, before taxes of $1.0 million as of January 1, 2001. There was no transition adjustment at January 1, 2001 or any ineffectiveness gain or loss that impacted net income for 2001.
As of December 31, 2001, the Company had $706.4 million of interest rate swaps, of which $206.4 million were fair value hedges and $500.0 million were cash flow hedges. The positive mark-to-market on the fair value hedges resulted in the recognition of other assets of $9.6 million, other liabilities of $0.7 million and an increase in hedged deposits and borrowings of $8.9 million. The positive mark-to-market on the cash flow hedges of variable rate loans resulted in the recognition of other assets and comprehensive income of $11.7 million, before taxes of $4.9 million. In addition, deposits and borrowings included $1.8 million and comprehensive income included $2.8 million, before taxes of $1.2 million relating to interest rate swaps terminated with positive benefit during 2001. These amounts are being amortized into income over the designated hedged period. Amounts to be paid or received on the interest rate swaps will be reclassified into earnings upon receipt of interest payments on the underlying hedged loans, including amounts totaling $8.9 million that were reclassified into net interest income during the year ended December 31, 2001. Of the $14.5 million of comprehensive income cash flow hedges, $13.2 million is expected to reclassified into net interest income within the next 12 months.
The Company has not entered into transactions involving any other more sophisticated interest rate derivative financial instruments, such as interest rate floors, caps, and interest rate futures contracts. The Company could consider using such financial instruments in the future if they offered a significant financial advantage over interest rate swaps.
The table below shows the notional amounts of the Company's interest rate swap maturities and average rates at December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000:
Interest Rate Swap Maturities and Average Rates
December 31, 2001
Notional amounts in millions |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
Thereafter |
Total |
Fair Value |
||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Notional amount | $ | 365.0 | $ | 150.0 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 191.4 | $ | 706.4 | $ | 20.6 | (1) | |||||||||
Weighted average rate received | 5.55 | % | 5.50 | % | | % | | % | | % | 6.21 | % | 5.72 | % | ||||||||||||
Weighted average rate paid | 1.92 | % | 1.90 | % | | % | | % | | % | 3.12 | % | 2.24 | % |
Interest Rate Swap Maturities and Average Rates
December 31, 2000
Notional amounts in millions |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
Thereafter |
Total |
Fair Value |
||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Notional amount | $ | 315.0 | $ | 295.0 | $ | 50.0 | $ | 15.0 | $ | | $ | 125.0 | $ | 800.0 | $ | 7.5 | (1) | |||||||||
Weighted average rate received | 6.55 | % | 6.24 | % | 7.28 | % | 5.39 | % | | % | 6.64 | % | 6.47 | % | ||||||||||||
Weighted average rate paid | 6.74 | % | 6.71 | % | 6.76 | % | 6.71 | % | | % | 6.91 | % | 6.75 | % |
At December 31, 2001, the Company's outstanding foreign exchange contracts for both those purchased as well as sold totaled $110.3 million. The Company enters into foreign exchange contracts with its clients and counterparty banks primarily for the purpose of offsetting or hedging clients' transaction and economic exposures arising out of commercial transactions. The Company's policies also permit limited proprietary currency positioning within certain approved limits. The Company actively manages its foreign exchange exposures within prescribed risk limits and controls. All foreign exchange contracts outstanding at December 31, 2001 had remaining maturities of twelve months or less and the mark-to-market included in other assets totaled $0.2 million.
A-18
Securities
Securities held to facilitate client trading orders are classified as trading securities. All other securities are classified as available-for-sale. The securities available-for-sale portfolio includes both debt and marketable equity securities. Substantially all of the fair values of securities are determined using publicly traded market quotations. Where there are no other sources for values, some values are determined from third parties that make a market for certain financial instruments. At December 31, 2001, the securities available-for-sale portfolio had an unrealized net gain of $4.0 million, comprised of $20.9 million of unrealized gains and $16.9 million of unrealized losses. At December 31, 2000, the securities available-for-sale portfolio had an unrealized net loss of $19.8 million, comprised of $29.4 million of unrealized losses and $9.6 million of unrealized gains. The unrealized gain or loss on securities available-for-sale is reported on an after-tax basis as a valuation allowance that is a component of other comprehensive income (loss).
Comparative period end security portfolio balances are presented below:
Securities Available-for-Sale
|
December 31, 2001 |
December 31, 2000 |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dollars in thousands |
|||||||||||||
Cost |
Fair Value |
Cost |
Fair Value |
||||||||||
U.S. Government and federal agency | $ | 300,653 | $ | 306,206 | $ | 646,629 | $ | 648,374 | |||||
Mortgage-backed | 1,070,670 | 1,075,533 | 438,667 | 437,221 | |||||||||
State and Municipal | 187,519 | 190,201 | 158,983 | 160,139 | |||||||||
Other debt securities | 31,924 | 30,266 | 165,489 | 150,913 | |||||||||
Total debt securities | 1,590,766 | 1,602,206 | 1,409,768 | 1,396,647 | |||||||||
Marketable equity securities | 220,124 | 212,633 | 157,908 | 151,197 | |||||||||
Total securities | $ | 1,810,890 | $ | 1,814,839 | $ | 1,567,676 | $ | 1,547,844 | |||||
At December 31, 2001, the fair value of securities available-for-sale totaled $1,814.8 million, an increase of $267.0 million, or 17.2% from December 31, 2000. The increase was due to investing activities of the registered investment subsidiary which reinvests principal and interest payments on loans in securities available-for-sale. The average duration of total available-for-sale securities at December 31, 2001 was 3.4 years compared with 3.6 years at December 31, 2000.
The following table provides the expected remaining maturities and yields (taxable-equivalent basis) of debt securities within the securities portfolio at December 31, 2001. To compare the tax-exempt asset yields to taxable yields, amounts are adjusted to pre-tax equivalents based on the marginal corporate federal tax rate of 35%.
Debt Available-for-Sale Securities
|
One year or less |
Over 1 year thru 5 years |
Over 5 years thru 10 years |
Over 10 years |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dollars in thousands |
Amount |
% Yield |
Amount |
% Yield |
Amount |
% Yield |
Amount |
% Yield |
Amount |
% Yield |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government and federal agency |
$ | 14,783 | 5.89 | $ | 192,029 | 5.27 | $ | 99,394 | 6.22 | $ | | | $ | 306,206 | 5.61 | |||||||||||
Mortgage-backed | | | 553 | 6.25 | 4,312 | 6.32 | 1,070,668 | 6.38 | 1,075,533 | 6.38 | ||||||||||||||||
State and Municipal | 13,760 | 6.87 | 60,106 | 6.68 | 103,132 | 6.75 | 13,203 | 6.81 | 190,201 | 6.74 | ||||||||||||||||
Other debt securities | | | | | 16,232 | 7.60 | 14,034 | 8.05 | 30,266 | 7.81 | ||||||||||||||||
Total debt securities | $ | 28,543 | 6.36 | $ | 252,688 | 5.61 | $ | 223,070 | 6.57 | $ | 1,097,905 | 6.41 | $ | 1,602,206 | 6.30 | |||||||||||
Amortized cost | $ | 28,075 | $ | 247,939 | $ | 220,774 | $ | 1,093,978 | $ | 1,590,766 | ||||||||||||||||
A-19
Dividend income included in interest income on securities in the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive income was $9.5 million for 2001 and 2000.
Loan Portfolio
Total loans were $7,159.2 million, $6,527.1 million, and $5,490.7 million at December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively. Management divides the Company's commercial loan portfolio into relationship loans and syndicated non-relationship loans. Syndicated non-relationship loans are loans agented by others where the Company has limited direct access to the borrower and provides no other banking products or services. Relationship commercial loans are all other commercial loans, including some syndicated loans, where the Company has direct access to the borrower and, therefore, has the opportunity to provide the borrower with multiple banking products or services, such as cash management, international, brokerage and trust services.
Total loans grew $632.1 million during 2001. Residential first mortgages grew $313.6 million in 2001 while real estate mortgage loans grew $188.3 million. Construction loans grew $133.8 million while relationship commercial loans grew $104.0 million.
The most significant areas of loan growth in 2000 were the $722.8 million increase in commercial relationship loans and the $437.7 million increase in real estate mortgage loans. In addition, real estate construction loans increased by $107.4 million. Residential first mortgage loans increased $100.4 million.
The following table shows the Company's consolidated loans by type of loan or borrower and their percentage distribution:
|
December 31, |
||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dollars in thousands |
|||||||||||||||||
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
1998 |
1997 |
|||||||||||||
Commercial | |||||||||||||||||
Relationship | $ | 3,160,418 | $ | 3,056,464 | $ | 2,333,627 | $ | 1,950,653 | $ | 1,731,860 | |||||||
Syndicated non-relationship | 86,902 | 191,789 | 536,811 | 507,293 | 240,372 | ||||||||||||
3,247,320 | 3,248,253 | 2,870,438 | 2,457,946 | 1,972,232 | |||||||||||||
Real estate mortgage | 1,668,114 | 1,479,862 | 1,042,123 | 747,711 | 686,188 | ||||||||||||
Residential first mortgage | 1,587,303 | 1,273,711 | 1,173,334 | 1,038,229 | 980,040 | ||||||||||||
Real estate construction | 586,066 | 452,301 | 344,870 | 237,015 | 144,558 | ||||||||||||
Installment loans | 70,403 | 73,018 | 59,904 | 49,526 | 42,206 | ||||||||||||
Total loans | $ | 7,159,206 | $ | 6,527,145 | $ | 5,490,669 | $ | 4,530,427 | $ | 3,825,224 | |||||||
Commercial | |||||||||||||||||
Relationship | 44.1 | % | 46.9 | % | 42.4 | % | 43.1 | % | 45.3 | % | |||||||
Syndicated non-relationship | 1.2 | 2.9 | 9.8 | 11.2 | 6.3 | ||||||||||||
Real estate mortgage | 23.3 | 22.7 | 19.0 | 16.5 | 17.9 | ||||||||||||
Residential first mortgage | 22.2 | 19.5 | 21.4 | 22.9 | 25.6 | ||||||||||||
Real estate construction | 8.2 | 6.9 | 6.3 | 5.2 | 3.8 | ||||||||||||
Installment loans | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | ||||||||||||
Total loans | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||
The Company's loan portfolio consists primarily of short-term loans for business and real estate purposes. Loans are generally made on the basis of a secure repayment source as the first priority, and collateral is generally a secondary source for loan qualification. Although the legal lending limit for any
A-20
one borrower can amount to $155.9 million at December 31, 2001, the Bank has established "house limits" for individual borrowings which vary by risk rating. The highest amount which can be extended to any one borrower without the approval of the Bank's Audit Committee in 2001 was $40.0 million. At December 31, 2001, there were 20 relationships with commitments greater than $25.0 million. Of the 20 relationships, 9 had outstanding balances greater than $25.0 million with the largest outstanding being a $74.8 million security secured loan.
Commercial
Commercial syndicated non-relationship loans were $86.9 million at December 31, 2001, representing approximately 1% of the loan portfolio. At December 31, 2000, syndicated non-relationship loans totaled $191.8 million, or 3% of the loan portfolio. The reduction in syndicated non-relationship loans reflects management's decision to reduce the higher credit risk exposure associated with that portfolio. The average outstanding loan balance in the syndicated non-relationship portfolio at December 31, 2001 was $2.8 million, which represents just over half of the average commitment amount.
Syndicated non-relationship loans at December 31, 2001 included media and communications related credits totaling $33.2 million (average outstandings of $3.0 million) and a group of highly diversified corporate outstandings aggregating $53.7 million (average outstandings of $2.7 million). The Company has identified media and communications as one of its industry specialties. An additional $137.8 million of media and communications credits were outstanding in the Company's commercial relationship portfolio. At December 31, 2001, the Company had a total of $1.4 million of syndicated non-relationship media and communications credits on nonaccrual.
Management expects the remaining syndicated non-relationship portfolio of corporate borrowers to be reduced over time through scheduled repayments, as well as future events and market driven activities. The corporate syndicated non-relationship portfolio at December 31, 2001 included $4.5 million of nonaccrual loans.
The commercial relationship loan portfolio primarily consists of loans to middle-market companies, professional and business borrowers, and associated individuals. The commercial loan portfolio at December 31, 2001, does not contain any direct energy-related borrowings and a limited amount of technology-related borrowingsless than one half of one percent of the total commercial loan portfolio. The average outstanding individual note balance in the $3,160.4 million commercial relationship loan portfolio at December 31, 2001 was $428,000. See "Results of OperationsNet Interest Income."
A-21
Following is a breakdown of commercial relationship loans to businesses engaged in the industries listed.
Commercial Relationship Loans By Industry
|
December 31, |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dollars in thousands |
|||||||||||
2001 |
% |
2000 |
% |
||||||||
Services(1) | $ | 941,063 | 29.8 | $ | 765,120 | 25.0 | |||||
Entertainment | 502,943 | 15.9 | 551,273 | 18.0 | |||||||
Wholesale Trade | 357,952 | 11.3 | 311,762 | 10.2 | |||||||
Manufacturing | 339,045 | 10.7 | 306,668 | 10.0 | |||||||
Real Estate and Construction | 323,735 | 10.2 | 255,180 | 8.3 | |||||||
Finance and Insurance | 241,121 | 7.6 | 219,047 | 7.2 | |||||||
Retail Trade | 165,009 | 5.2 | 95,115 | 3.1 | |||||||
Media and Communications | 137,811 | 4.4 | 214,339 | 7.0 | |||||||
Other | 151,739 | 4.9 | 337,960 | 11.2 | |||||||
Total | $ | 3,160,418 | 100.0 | $ | 3,056,464 | 100.0 | |||||
Real Estate Mortgage
Real estate mortgages, representing 23.3% of the loan portfolio, consists of 85.2% commercial and 14.8% residential (1-4 family including undeveloped land, condominium/apartments and equity lines of credit). The average outstanding individual note balance at December 31, 2001 was approximately $690,000.
Following is a breakdown of real estate mortgage loans, where over half of the increase is in the office buildings category, by collateral type:
Real Estate Mortgage Loans by Collateral Type
|
December 31, |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dollars in thousands |
|||||||||||
2001 |
% |
2000 |
% |
||||||||
Industrial | $ | 623,417 | 37.4 | $ | 693,168 | 46.8 | |||||
Office buildings | 262,089 | 15.7 | 150,239 | 10.2 | |||||||
Shopping centers | 174,226 | 10.4 | 100,834 | 6.8 | |||||||
1-4 family (includes undeveloped land) | 61,984 | 3.7 | 44,283 | 3.0 | |||||||
Condominiums/apartments | 84,813 | 5.1 | 67,381 | 4.6 | |||||||
Land, nonresidential | 27,051 | 1.6 | 9,884 | 0.7 | |||||||
Churches/religious | 15,635 | 0.9 | 15,560 | 1.1 | |||||||
Equity lines of credit | 99,890 | 6.0 | 68,626 | 4.6 | |||||||
Other | 319,009 | 19.2 | 329,887 | 22.2 | |||||||
Total | $ | 1,668,114 | 100.0 | $ | 1,479,862 | 100.0 | |||||
A-22
Residential First Mortgage
Residential first mortgage loans which comprised 22.2% of total loans at December 31, 2001, continued an eight-year growth trend, increasing $313.6 million, or 24.6%, to $1,587.3 million at December 31, 2001. At December 31, 2001, 94.0% of the portfolio was originated internally, and the balance was purchased from third parties. The residential first mortgage loans originated internally have a weighted average loan to value ratio of 61.0% at origination. The average outstanding individual note balance at December 31, 2001 was approximately $592,000.
Construction
The real estate construction portfolio, representing 8.2% of the loan portfolio, consists of 70.8% commercial and 29.2% residential. Such loans are made on the basis of the economic viability for the specific project, the cash flow resources of the developer, the developer's equity in the project, and the underlying financial strength of the borrower. The Company's policy is to monitor each loan with respect to incurred costs, sales price, and sales cycle. The average outstanding individual note balance at December 31, 2001 was approximately $2,402,000.
Following is a breakdown of real estate construction loans, where over half of the increase is in the 1-4 family category, by collateral type:
Real Estate Construction Loans by Collateral Type
|
December 31, |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dollars in thousands |
|||||||||||
2001 |
% |
2000 |
% |
||||||||
Industrial | $ | 166,241 | 28.4 | $ | 144,136 | 31.9 | |||||
1-4 family (includes undeveloped land) | 109,204 | 18.6 | 34,513 | 7.6 | |||||||
Office buildings | 108,734 | 18.6 | 54,246 | 12.0 | |||||||
Shopping centers | 80,637 | 13.8 | 37,602 | 8.3 | |||||||
Condominiums/apartments | 61,987 | 10.6 | 82,133 | 18.2 | |||||||
Other | 59,263 | 10.0 | 99,671 | 22.0 | |||||||
Total | $ | 586,066 | 100.0 | $ | 452,301 | 100.0 | |||||
Installment
Installment loans consist primarily of loans to individuals for personal purchases. The average outstanding individual note balance at December 31, 2001 was approximately $23,000.
Concentrations of credit risk arise when a number of clients are engaged in similar business activities, or activities in the same geographic region, or have similar economic features that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations to be similarly affected by changes in economic conditions. Although the Company has a diversified loan portfolio, a substantial portion of the loan portfolio and credit performance depends on the economic stability of Southern California, which in some degree relies on the stability of entertainment and media companies and, to a lesser extent, Northern California.
The Company's lending activities are predominately in California although it has some loans to domestic clients who are engaged in international trade or film productions.
Inherent in any loan portfolio are risks associated with certain types of loans. The Company assesses and manages credit risk on an ongoing basis through diversification guidelines, lending limits, credit review and approval policies, and internal monitoring. As part of the control process, an independent loan review and compliance department regularly examines the Company's loan portfolio
A-23
and other credit related products, including unused commitments and letters of credit. In addition to this internal credit process, the Company's loan portfolio is subject to examination by external regulators in the normal course of business. Credit quality is influenced by underlying trends in the economic and business cycle. With the slowdown in the economy, the Company has enhanced its training program for its line officers and implemented additional credit underwriting and monitoring procedures. The Company also seeks to manage and control its risk through diversification of the portfolio by type of loan, industry concentration, and type of borrower as well as specific maximum loan-to-value (LTV) limitations at origination as to various categories of real estate related loans other than residential first mortgage loans. These ratios are as follows:
Category of Real Estate Collateral |
Maximum LTV Ratio |
||
---|---|---|---|
1-4 family (includes undeveloped land) | 80 | % | |
Condominiums/apartments | 80 | ||
Equity lines of credit | 80 | ||
Industrial | 80 | ||
Shopping centers | 80 | ||
Churches/religious | 75 | ||
Office building | 75 | ||
Other improved property | 70 | ||
Land, nonresidential | 50 |
The Company's loan policy provides that any term loan on income-producing properties must have a minimum debt service coverage of at least 1.20 to 1 for non-owner occupied property and at least 1.05 to 1 for owner occupied at origination. Any exception to these guidelines requires approval at higher levels of authority based on the type of exception. All exceptions are reviewed by the Credit Policy Committee of the Bank.
One of the significant risks associated with real estate lending is the risk associated with the possible existence of environmental risks or hazards on or in property affiliated with the loan. The Company mitigates such risks through the use of an Environmental Risk Questionnaire for all loans secured by real estate. A Phase I environmental report is required if indicated by the questionnaire or if for any other reason it is determined appropriate. Other reasons would include the industrial use of environmentally sensitive substances or the proximity to other known environmental problems. A Phase II report is required in certain cases, depending on the outcome of the Phase I report.
At December 31, 2001, 74.9% of commercial loans and 47.9% of real estate loans, including residential first mortgages, outstanding were floating interest rate loans. There were no floating rate installment loans as of December 31, 2001. Floating rate loans comprised 59.7% of the total loan portfolio at December 31, 2001 and 62.8% at December 31, 2000. Total loans at December 31, 2001 consisted of 39.3% due in one year or less, 16.6% due in one to five years and 44.1% due after five years.
The loan maturities shown in the table below are based on contractual maturities. As is customary in the banking industry, loans that meet sound underwriting criteria can be renewed by mutual agreement between the Company and the borrower. Because the Company is unable to estimate the extent to which its borrowers will renew their loans, the table is based on contractual maturities.
A-24
|
December 31, 2001 |
|||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dollars in thousands |
Commercial |
Real Estate Mortgage |
Residential First Mortgage |
Real Estate Construction |
Installment |
Total |
||||||||||||||
Aggregate maturies of loan balances due: | ||||||||||||||||||||
In one year or less | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest ratefloating | $ | 1,923,969 | $ | 296,109 | $ | 1,955 | $ | 497,775 | $ | | $ | 2,719,808 | ||||||||
Interest ratefixed | 67,015 | 4,947 | 13 | 12,580 | 7,903 | 92,458 | ||||||||||||||
After one year but within five years | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest ratefloating | 463,207 | 136,159 | 38 | 59,450 | | 658,854 | ||||||||||||||
Interest ratefixed | 373,832 | 67,386 | 59,067 | 2,648 | 29,308 | 532,241 | ||||||||||||||
After five years | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest ratefloating | 45,085 | 419,145 | 427,135 | 1,460 | | 892,825 | ||||||||||||||
Interest ratefixed | 374,212 | 744,368 | 1,099,095 | 12,153 | 33,192 | 2,263,020 | ||||||||||||||
Total loans | $ | 3,247,320 | $ | 1,668,114 | $ | 1,587,303 | $ | 586,066 | $ | 70,403 | $ | 7,159,206 | ||||||||
Asset Quality
Allowance for Credit Losses
A consequence of lending activities is that losses may be experienced. The amount of such losses will vary from time to time depending upon the risk characteristics of the loan portfolio as affected by economic conditions, rising interest rates, and the financial experience of borrowers. The allowance for credit losses which provides for the risk of losses inherent in the credit extension process, is increased by the provision for credit losses charged to operating expense and allowances acquired through acquisitions and is decreased by the amount of charge-offs, net of recoveries. There is no precise method of predicting specific losses or amounts that ultimately may be charged off on particular segments of the loan portfolio.
The Company has an internal risk analysis and review staff that ultimately reports to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and continually reviews loan quality. This analysis includes a detailed review of the classification and categorization of problem, potential problem loans and loans to be charged off, an assessment of the overall quality and collectibility of the portfolio, and consideration of the loan loss experience, trends in problem loans, and concentration of credit risk, as well as current economic conditions particularly in California. Management then evaluates the allowance, determines its desired level, determines appropriate provisions and reviews the results with the Audit Committee.
The allowance for credit losses is a significant estimate that can and does change based on management's process in analyzing the loan portfolio and on management's assumptions about specific borrowers and the impact on the portfolio of applicable economic and environmental conditions, among other factors. The Company's methodology for determining the allowance for loan losses establishes both a specific and a general component. The specific component of the allowance for commercial and real estate loans is based principally on current loan grades and historical loan loss experience adjusted to reflect current conditions, as well as analyses of other factors that may have affected the collectibilty of loans in the portfolio. The specific component of the allowance for residential first mortgage and installment loans is based principally on loan payment status and historical loss rates adjusted to reflect current conditions. The general component of the allowance for loan losses represents the results of analyses that estimate probable losses inherent in the total portfolio that are not fully captured in the specific allowance analyses. These analyses include industry concentrations, current economic factors, trends in the portfolio and the estimated impact of current economic conditions on certain historical loss rates used. In assessing the impact of current economic factors and the estimated impact of current economic conditions on certain historical loss rates, management continuously monitors trends in loan portfolio qualitative factors, including loan growth,
A-25
past due loans, criticized loans and nonperforming loans. Based on known information available to it at the date of this report, management believes that the Company's allowance for credit losses was adequate for foreseeable losses at December 31, 2001. Examinations of the loan portfolio are also conducted periodically by the Company's regulators.
Based on expected loan growth, the levels of nonperforming loans and net charge-offs, it is anticipated that the level of the allowance will require additional provisions for credit losses in 2002, but not necessarily equal to the amount of net charge-offs. Credit quality will be influenced by underlying trends in the economic cycle, particularly in California, and other factors which are beyond management's control. Consequently, no assurances can be given that the Company will not sustain loan losses, in any particular period, that are sizable in relation to the allowance for credit losses. Additionally, subsequent evaluation of the loan portfolio, in light of factors then prevailing, by the Company and its regulators may warrant an adjustment to the amount of the projected provision. See "Provision for Credit Losses."
The following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for credit losses for the five years ended December 31, 2001:
|
Year ended December 31, |
|||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dollars in thousands |
||||||||||||||||||
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
1998 |
1997 |
||||||||||||||
Average amount of loans outstanding | $ | 6,713,315 | $ | 6,236,334 | $ | 4,822,254 | $ | 4,213,853 | $ | 3,387,784 | ||||||||
Balance of allowance for credit losses, beginning of year | $ | 135,435 | $ | 134,077 | $ | 135,339 | $ | 137,761 | $ | 130,089 | ||||||||
Loans charged off: | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | ||||||||||||||||||
Relationship | (29,632 | ) | (22,293 | ) | (10,672 | ) | (12,987 | ) | (12,440 | ) | ||||||||
Syndicated non-relationship | (11,812 | ) | (18,167 | ) | (8,093 | ) | (2,032 | ) | (2,211 | ) | ||||||||
(41,444 | ) | (40,460 | ) | (18,765 | ) | (15,019 | ) | (14,651 | ) | |||||||||
Real estate mortgage | (842 | ) | (905 | ) | (455 | ) | (1,382 | ) | (4,275 | ) | ||||||||
Residential first mortgage | (220 | ) | (77 | ) | (158 | ) | (1,128 | ) | (474 | ) | ||||||||
Installment | (73 | ) | (134 | ) | (150 | ) | (107 | ) | (112 | ) | ||||||||
Total loans charged off | (42,579 | ) | (41,576 | ) | (19,528 | ) | (17,636 | ) | (19,512 | ) | ||||||||
Recoveries of loans previously charged off: | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | ||||||||||||||||||
Relationship | 11,647 | 7,977 | 13,403 | 11,556 | 11,098 | |||||||||||||
Syndicated non-relationship | 1,012 | | | | | |||||||||||||
12,659 | 7,977 | 13,403 | 11,556 | 11,098 | ||||||||||||||
Real estate mortgage | 2,011 | 1,959 | 893 | 397 | 8,894 | |||||||||||||
Residential first mortgage | 282 | 1,522 | 527 | 503 | 58 | |||||||||||||
Installment | 54 | 49 | 28 | 11 | 118 | |||||||||||||
Total recoveries | 15,006 | 11,507 | 14,851 | 12,467 | 20,168 | |||||||||||||
Net loans (charged off) recovered | (27,573 | ) | (30,069 | ) | (4,677 | ) | (5,169 | ) | 656 | |||||||||
Additions to allowance charged to operating expense | 35,000 | 21,500 | | | | |||||||||||||
Acquisitions | | 9,927 | 3,415 | 2,747 | 7,016 | |||||||||||||
Balance, end of year | $ | 142,862 | $ | 135,435 | $ | 134,077 | $ | 135,339 | $ | 137,761 | ||||||||
Ratio of net (charge offs) recoveries to average loans | (0.41 | )% | (0.48 | )% | (0.10 | )% | (0.12 | )% | 0.02 | % | ||||||||
Ratio of net relationship (charge offs) recoveries to average relationship loans | (0.25 | )% | (0.21 | )% | 0.08 | % | (0.08 | )% | 0.09 | % | ||||||||
A-26
Net loan charge-offs were $27.6 million, or 0.41%, of average loans during 2001. Included in this amount was $10.8 million in net loan charge-offs in syndicated non-relationship loans which represented 39.2% of net loan charge-offs. Net charge-offs for 2000 and 1999 were $30.1 million, or 0.48%, and $4.7 million, or 0.10%, of average loans, respectively.
The allowance for credit losses as a percentage of total loans was 2.00%, 2.07%, and 2.44% at December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively. The allowance for credit losses as a percentage of nonperforming loans was 370.5%, 218.5%, and 530.2% at December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively. See "Nonaccrual, Past Due, and Restructured Loans".
Based on an evaluation of individual credits, previous loan loss experience, management's evaluation of the current loan portfolio, and current economic conditions, management has allocated the allowance for credit losses as shown for the past five years in the table below.
Allocation of Allowance for Credit Losses
|
Allowance amount |
Percent of loans to total loans |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dollars in thousands |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
1998 |
1997 |
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
1998 |
1997 |
||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Relationship | $ | 79,195 | $ | 74,920 | $ | 63,082 | $ | 80,275 | $ | 81,101 | 44 | % | 47 | % | 42 | % | 43 | % | 45 | % | |||||||
Syndicated non-relationship | 7,747 | 17,717 | 15,579 | 20,536 | 10,813 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 11 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||
Real estate mortgage | 24,686 | 24,517 | 33,590 | 16,508 | 27,378 | 23 | 23 | 19 | 17 | 18 | |||||||||||||||||
Residential first mortgage | 21,998 | 10,453 | 17,659 | 15,625 | 14,750 | 23 | 19 | 22 | 23 | 26 | |||||||||||||||||
Real estate construction | 8,176 | 6,645 | 2,837 | 1,950 | 3,357 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||
Installment | 1,060 | 1,183 | 1,330 | 445 | 362 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 142,862 | $ | 135,435 | $ | 134,077 | $ | 135,339 | $ | 137,761 | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | |||||||
While the allowance is allocated to portfolios, the allowance is general in nature and is available for the portfolio in its entirety. In 2001, an increase in problem loans in the commercial loan category and an increase in residential first mortgages resulted in increased allocations while a decrease in syndicated non-relationship loans outstanding resulted in a decreased allocation to this category of loans.
At December 31, 2001, there was $29.2 million of impaired loans included in nonaccrual loans, $10.2 million of which had an allowance of $2.6 million allocated to them. At December 31, 2000, there was $49.1 million of impaired loans included in nonaccrual loans, $3.2 million of which had an allowance of $1.2 million allocated to them. The allowance represents the difference between the value of the collateral supporting those loans and the outstanding balances of those loans and is included in the allowance for credit losses. A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that a creditor will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Once a loan is determined to be impaired, SFAS No. 114 requires that the impairment be measured based on the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate, except that as a practical expedient, the impairment may be measured by using the loan's observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. The Company's policy is to record cash receipts on impaired loans first as reductions in principal and then as interest income.
Nonaccrual, Past Due, and Restructured Loans
Total nonperforming assets (nonaccrual loans and ORE) were $38.6 million, or 0.54% of total loans and ORE at December 31, 2001, compared with $62.5 million, or 0.96%, at December 31, 2000, primarily due to a decline in nonperforming syndicated non-relationship loans.
A-27
Total nonperforming relationship assets were $32.7 million, or 0.46%, of total relationship loans and ORE at December 31, 2001, compared with $39.5 million, 0.62% at December 31, 2000. The nonaccrual loan portfolio does not contain any concentration of credits within a specific industry sector. Syndicated non-relationship loans on nonaccrual status represented 15.2% of the total, or $5.9 million at December 31, 2001. The nonperforming syndicated non-relationship loans consisted of three borrowers at December 31, 2001.
The following table presents information concerning nonaccrual loans, ORE, accruing loans which are contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal payments and still accruing, and restructured loans:
Nonaccrual, Past Due, and Restructured Loans
|
December 31, |
|||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dollars in thousands |
||||||||||||||||||
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
1998 |
1997 |
||||||||||||||
Nonaccrual loans: | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | ||||||||||||||||||
Relationship | $ | 26,751 | $ | 30,343 | $ | 13,368 | $ | 4,763 | $ | 6,589 | ||||||||
Syndicated non-relationship | 5,864 | 23,012 | | | | |||||||||||||
32,615 | 53,355 | 13,368 | 4,763 | 6,589 | ||||||||||||||
Real estate | 5,393 | 8,132 | 10,380 | 17,204 | 19,243 | |||||||||||||
Installment | 555 | 499 | 1,540 | 1,171 | 1,734 | |||||||||||||
Total | 38,563 | 61,986 | 25,288 | 23,138 | 27,566 | |||||||||||||
ORE | 10 | 522 | 1,413 | 3,480 | 2,126 | |||||||||||||
Total nonaccrual loans and ORE | $ | 38,573 | $ | 62,508 | $ | 26,701 | $ | 26,618 | $ | 29,692 | ||||||||
Total nonaccrual loans as a percentage of total loans |
0.54 | % | 0.95 | % | 0.46 | % | 0.51 | % | 0.72 | % | ||||||||
Total nonaccrual loans and ORE as a percentage of total loans and ORE | 0.54 | 0.96 | 0.49 | 0.59 | 0.78 | |||||||||||||
Total relationship nonaccrual loans and ORE to total relationship loans and ORE | 0.46 | 0.62 | 0.54 | 0.66 | 0.83 | |||||||||||||
Allowance for credit losses to total loans | 2.00 | 2.07 | 2.44 | 2.99 | 3.60 | |||||||||||||
Allowance for credit losses to nonaccrual loans | 370.46 | 218.49 | 530.20 | 584.92 | 499.75 | |||||||||||||
Loans past due 90 days or more on accrual status: | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | $ | 1,764 | $ | 1,543 | $ | 2,794 | $ | 7,661 | $ | 9,226 | ||||||||
Real estate | 878 | 4,361 | 736 | 949 | 13,370 | |||||||||||||
Installment | 973 | 20 | 503 | 13 | 3,596 | |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 3,615 | $ | 5,924 | $ | 4,033 | $ | 8,623 | $ | 26,192 | ||||||||
Restructured loans: | ||||||||||||||||||
On accrual status | $ | | $ | 829 | $ | 2,707 | $ | 1,982 | $ | 2,813 | ||||||||
On nonaccrual status | | 740 | 368 | 1,682 | 1,286 | |||||||||||||
Total | $ | | $ | 1,569 | $ | 3,075 | $ | 3,664 | $ | 4,099 | ||||||||
Company policy requires that a loan be placed on nonaccrual status if either principal or interest payments are ninety days past due, unless the loan is both well secured and in process of collection, or if full collection of interest or principal becomes uncertain, regardless of the time period involved.
At December 31, 2001, in addition to loans disclosed above as past due, nonaccrual or restructured, management also identified $12.8 million of loans about which the ability of the borrowers
A-28
to comply with the present loan payment terms in the future is questionable. However, the inability of the borrowers to comply with repayment terms was not sufficiently probable to place the loan on nonaccrual status at December 31, 2001. This amount was determined based on analysis of information known to management about the borrower's financial condition and current economic conditions. Included is one loan to a borrower in the telecommunications industry for $9.8 million, which due to events occurring in 2002, will result in a charge-off of between approximately $4.5 and $6.5 million in the first quarter. If economic conditions change, adversely or otherwise, or if additional facts on the borrowers' financial condition come to light, then the amount of potential problem loans may change, possibly significantly. Estimated potential losses from these potential problem loans have been provided for in determining the allowance for credit losses.
The table below summarizes the approximate changes in nonaccrual loans for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000.
Dollars in thousands |
2001 |
2000 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance, beginning of the year | $ | 61,986 | $ | 25,288 | ||||
Loans placed on nonaccrual | ||||||||
Relationship | 36,769 | 47,731 | ||||||
Syndicated non-relationship | 12,226 | 38,789 | ||||||
Loans from acquisitions | | 4,428 | ||||||
Charge offs | (26,306 | ) | (22,656 | ) | ||||
Loans returned to accrual status | (2,092 | ) | (9,010 | ) | ||||
Repayments (including interest applied to principal) | (43,858 | ) | (22,584 | ) | ||||
Transfers to ORE | (162 | ) | | |||||
Balance, end of year | $ | 38,563 | $ | 61,986 | ||||
The additional interest income that would have been recorded from nonaccrual loans, if the loans had not been on nonaccrual status was $7.3 million, $10.2 million, and $3.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively. Interest payments received on nonaccrual loans are applied to principal unless there is no doubt as to ultimate full repayment of principal, in which case, the interest payment is recognized as interest income. Interest collected and applied to principal was $6.1 million, $5.7 million, and $3.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively, from collection of interest related to nonaccrual loans. Interest income not recognized on nonaccrual loans reduced the net interest margin by 8, 14, and 6 basis points for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively.
Other Real Estate
The amount of the Company's ORE was $10 thousand at December 31, 2001 compared to $0.5 million a year ago. The Company's policy is to record these properties at estimated fair value, net of selling expenses, at the time they are transferred into ORE, thereby tying future gains or losses from sale or potential additional write-downs to underlying changes in the market.
A-29
Other Assets
Other assets include the following:
|
December 31, |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dollars in thousands |
|||||||
2001 |
2000 |
||||||
Accrued interest receivable | $ | 44,432 | $ | 53,423 | |||
Loans held-for-sale | 23,558 | 7,173 | |||||
Claim in receivership and other assets | 22,242 | 18,950 | |||||
Swap mark-to-market | 21,254 | | |||||
Other | 28,577 | 28,833 | |||||
Total other assets | $ | 140,063 | $ | 108,379 | |||
Loans held-for-sale consisted of four loans at December 31, 2001 and two loans at December 31, 2000. Two loans totaling $14.4 million were sold in the first quarter of 2002 with no further write-down.
The claim in receivership and other assets was acquired in the acquisition of Pacific Bank. The claim in receivership, which is approximately half of the balance, is expected to be realized in the first half of 2002.
See"Asset/Liability Management" for a discussion of interest rate swaps which result in the swap mark-to-market asset of $21.3 million.
Commitments and Lines of Credit
In the normal course of business, the Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, letters of credit, and financial guarantees. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount reflected in the consolidated balance sheet. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a client as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since a portion of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Corporation evaluates each client's creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis.
The Company had outstanding loan commitments aggregating $2,933.1 million at December 31, 2001. In addition, the Company had $315.4 million outstanding in bankers' acceptances and letters of credit of which $267.5 million relate to standby letters of credit at December 31, 2001. Substantially all of the Company's loan commitments are on a variable rate basis and are comprised of real estate and commercial loan commitments. All are appropriately considered in determining the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses.
Deposits and Borrowed Funds
Core deposits, which include noninterest-bearing deposits and interest-bearing deposits excluding time deposits of $100,000 and over, provide a stable source of low cost funding. Average core deposits were $5,598.1 million in 2001 compared with $4,957.4 million in 2000. The increase was due primarily to internally generated growth.
Certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more totaled $1,344.4 million at December 31, 2001, of which $1,035.4 million mature within three months, $188.9 million mature within four to six months, $95.0 million mature within seven months to one year and $25.1 mature beyond one year.
A-30
Short and long-term borrowed funds provided additional funding, albeit at a higher cost, to support loan and securities growth. Average borrowed funds were $1,317.7 million in 2001 compared with $1,311.6 million in 2000.
At December 31, 2001 and 2000, the aggregate amount of deposits by foreign depositors in domestic offices totaled $87.0 million and $122.5 million, respectively, the majority of which was interest bearing. As part of the Pacific Bank acquisition, the Bank has a depository office located in the Cayman Islands, British West Indies with deposits totaling $7.9 million at December 31, 2001. The Company expects to close this office in the first half of 2002. Brokered deposits were $236.6 million and $666.2 million, at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
Critical Accounting Policies
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements require management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates under difference assumptions or conditions.
Certain accounting policies involved significant judgements and assumptions by management which have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities; management considers such accounting policies to be critical accounting policies. The judgments and assumptions used by management are based on historical experience and other factors, which are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.
The Company believes the following are critical accounting policies that require the most significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements:
A-31
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE "SAFE HARBOR" PROVISIONS
OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
We have made forward-looking statements in this document that are subject to risks and uncertainties. These statements are based on the beliefs and assumptions of our management, and on information currently available to our management. Forward-looking statements include the information concerning our possible or assumed future results of operations, and statements preceded by, followed by, or that include the words "will," believes," "expects," "anticipates," "intends," "plans," "estimates," or similar expressions.
Our management believes these forward-looking statements are reasonable. However, you should not place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements, since they are based on current expectations. Actual results may differ materially from those currently expected or anticipated.
Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance. They involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. Our future results and shareholder values may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Many of the factors described below that will determine these results and values are beyond our ability to control or predict. For those statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
A number of factors, some of which are beyond the Corporation's ability to control or predict, could cause future results to differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements. These factors include (1) a continued economic slowdown in the national and California economies attributable to various ongoing developments such as declining retail sales, declines in consumer confidence, reduced industrial production, declining business inventories, reduced capacity utilization, and declining occupancy in commercial and residential real estate resulting in declines in underlying value of real estate assets, or other unforeseen adverse changes in national and regional economic activity, (2) increased economic uncertainty created by the most recent terrorist attacks on the United States, (3) economic uncertainty created by the military, diplomatic and humanitarian actions of the United States and allied nations in Afghanistan in response to the terrorists acts, (4) the increased prospect of additional terrorist acts within the United States and the uncertain effect of these events on our national and regional economies could have the following consequences, any of which could hurt our business.
Changes in interest rates affect our profitability. The Federal Reserve has lowered interest rates eleven times during 2001, and accordingly, we have lowered our interest rates on some loan and deposit products to maintain a competitive position. Changes in prevailing rates may hurt our business. We derive our income mainly from the difference or "spread" between the interest earned on loans, securities, and other interest-earning assets, and interest paid on deposits, borrowings, and other interest-bearing liabilities. In general, the wider the spread, the more we earn. When market rates of interest change, the interest we receive on our assets and the interest we pay on our liabilities fluctuates. This causes decreases in our spread and affects our net interest income. In addition, interest rates affect how much money we lend.
Significant changes in the provision or applications of laws on regulations affecting our business could materially affect our business. The banking industry is subject to extensive federal and state
A-32
regulations, and significant new laws or changes in, or repeals of, existing laws may cause results to differ materially. Also, federal monetary policy, particularly as implemented through the Federal Reserve System, significantly affects our credit conditions, primarily through open market operations in U.S. government securities, the discount rate for member bank borrowing, and bank reserve requirements. A material change in these conditions would affect our results. Parts of our business are also subject to federal and state securities laws and regulations. Significant changes in these laws and regulations would also affect our business. Recent new laws affecting our business include the implementation of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the adoption of new regulations by the banking agencies under this new law. The long term impact of compliance with these new laws and other related privacy initiatives is difficult to predict at this time.
We face strong competition from financial service companies and other companies that offer banking services which can hurt our business. Increased competition in our market may result in reduced loans and deposits. Ultimately, we may not be able to compete successfully against current and future competitors. Many competitors offer the banking services that we offer in our service area. These competitors include national, regional, and community banks. We also face competition from many other types of financial institutions, including, without limitation, savings and loans, finance companies, brokerage firms, insurance companies, credit unions, mortgage banks, and other financial intermediaries. Recently passed legislation will make it easier for other types of financial institutions to compete with us.
Our results would be adversely affected if we suffered higher than expected losses on our loans. We assume risk from the possibility that we will suffer losses because borrowers, guarantors, and related parties fail to perform under the terms of their loans. We try to minimize this risk by adopting and implementing what we believe are effective underwriting and credit policies and procedures, including how we establish and review the allowance for credit losses. We assess the likelihood of nonperformance, track loan performance, and diversify our credit portfolio. Those policies and procedures may still not prevent unexpected losses that could adversely affect our results.
Our financial results could be adversely affected by unanticipated changes in regulatory, judicial, or legislative tax treatment of business transactions.
A-33
QUARTERLY RESULTS
The following table summarizes quarterly operating results for 2001 and 2000.
2001 Quarterly Operating Results
|
Quarter ended |
|
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts |
|
||||||||||||||
March 31, |
June 30, |
September 30, |
December 31, |
Total |
|||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 164,192 | $ | 156,490 | $ | 156,516 | $ | 148,050 | $ | 625,248 | |||||
Interest expense | 59,275 | 51,441 | 45,387 | 34,991 | 191,094 | ||||||||||
Net interest income | 104,917 | 105,049 | 111,129 | 113,059 | 434,154 | ||||||||||
Provision for credit losses | 7,500 | 6,500 | 10,000 | 11,000 | 35,000 | ||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for credit losses |
97,417 | 98,549 | 101,129 | 102,059 | 399,154 | ||||||||||
Noninterest income | 30,284 | 32,355 | 31,366 | 35,037 | 129,042 | ||||||||||
Gain on sale of securities | 977 | 539 | 916 | 910 | 3,342 | ||||||||||
Noninterest expense | 76,604 | 79,012 | 77,329 | 80,450 | 313,395 | ||||||||||
Income before taxes | 52,074 | 52,431 | 56,082 | 57,556 | 218,143 | ||||||||||
Income taxes | 18,483 | 16,087 | 18,598 | 18,805 | 71,973 | ||||||||||
Net income | $ | 33,591 | $ | 36,344 | $ | 37,484 | $ | 38,751 | $ | 146,170 | |||||
Net income per share, basic | $ | 0.70 | $ | 0.76 | $ | 0.78 | $ | 0.81 | $ | 3.05 | |||||
Net income per share, diluted | $ | 0.69 | $ | 0.74 | $ | 0.75 | $ | 0.78 | $ | 2.96 | |||||
2000 Quarterly Operating Results
|
Quarter ended |
|
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts |
|
||||||||||||||
March 31, |
June 30, |
September 30, |
December 31, |
Total |
|||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 142,067 | $ | 164,076 | $ | 170,927 | $ | 169,218 | $ | 646,288 | |||||
Interest expense | 49,820 | 59,432 | 66,926 | 63,594 | 239,772 | ||||||||||
Net interest income | 92,247 | 104,644 | 104,001 | 105,624 | 406,516 | ||||||||||
Provision for credit losses | | 4,000 | 7,000 | 10,500 | 21,500 | ||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for credit losses | 92,247 | 100,644 | 97,001 | 95,124 | 385,016 | ||||||||||
Noninterest income | 24,020 | 26,795 | 26,703 | 28,834 | 106,352 | ||||||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of securities | 223 | (5 | ) | 1,819 | 1,095 | 3,132 | |||||||||
Noninterest expense | 69,085 | 76,074 | 73,984 | 75,627 | 294,770 | ||||||||||
Income before taxes | 47,405 | 51,360 | 51,539 | 49,426 | 199,730 | ||||||||||
Income taxes | 16,397 | 17,915 | 17,378 | 16,380 | 68,070 | ||||||||||
Net income | $ | 31,008 | $ | 33,445 | $ | 34,161 | $ | 33,046 | $ | 131,660 | |||||
Net income per share, basic | $ | 0.67 | $ | 0.70 | $ | 0.72 | $ | 0.70 | $ | 2.79 | |||||
Net income per share, diluted | $ | 0.66 | $ | 0.68 | $ | 0.70 | $ | 0.68 | $ | 2.72 | |||||
A-34
Management's Responsibility for Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation of the Corporation's consolidated financial statements and related information appearing in this annual report. Management believes that the consolidated financial statements fairly reflect the form and substance of transactions, and that the consolidated financial statements reasonably present the Corporation's financial position and results of operations in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Management also has included in the Corporation's consolidated financial statements amounts that are based on estimates and judgments that it believes are reasonable under the circumstances.
The independent auditors audit the Corporation's consolidated financial statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and provide an objective, independent review of the fairness of reported operating results and financial position.
The Board of Directors of the Corporation has an Audit Committee composed solely of three non-management directors. The Committee meets periodically with financial management, the internal auditors and the independent auditors to review accounting control, auditing and financial matters.
/s/ RUSSELL D. GOLDSMITH Russell D. Goldsmith Chief Executive Officer |
||
/s/ BRAM GOLDSMITH Bram Goldsmith Chairman of the Board |
||
/s/ FRANK P. PEKNY Frank P. Pekny Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
A-35
The
Board of Directors and Shareholders of
City National Corporation:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of City National Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Corporation's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of City National Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
As discussed in Notes 1 and 14 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities in 2001.
KPMG LLP
Los
Angeles, California
January 16, 2002
A-36
CITY NATIONAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
|
December 31, |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dollars in thousands, except share amounts |
|||||||||
2001 |
2000 |
||||||||
Assets | |||||||||
Cash and due from banks | $ | 328,018 | $ | 386,814 | |||||
Federal funds sold | 395,000 | 165,000 | |||||||
Securities available-for-sale (cost $1,810,890 and $1,567,676 in 2001 and 2000) | 1,814,839 | 1,547,844 | |||||||
Trading account securities | 78,266 | 46,078 | |||||||
Loans | 7,159,206 | 6,527,145 | |||||||
Less allowance for credit losses | 142,862 | 135,435 | |||||||
Net loans | 7,016,344 | 6,391,710 | |||||||
Premises and equipment, net | 66,414 | 63,010 | |||||||
Customers' acceptance liability | 7,924 | 14,736 | |||||||
Deferred tax asset | 36,230 | 65,986 | |||||||
Goodwill | 158,769 | 171,559 | |||||||
Core deposit intangibles | 18,530 | 24,148 | |||||||
Bank owned life insurance | 55,734 | 52,820 | |||||||
Affordable housing investments | 60,185 | 58,585 | |||||||
Other assets | 140,063 | 108,379 | |||||||
Total assets | $ | 10,176,316 | $ | 9,096,669 | |||||
Liabilities | |||||||||
Demand deposits | $ | 3,846,789 | $ | 3,276,203 | |||||
Interest checking deposits | 576,651 | 619,332 | |||||||
Money market deposits | 1,893,383 | 1,344,244 | |||||||
Savings deposits | 240,376 | 244,707 | |||||||
Time deposits-under $100,000 | 229,643 | 247,797 | |||||||
Time deposits-$100,000 and over | 1,344,360 | 1,676,387 | |||||||
Total deposits | 8,131,202 | 7,408,670 | |||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements | 171,531 | 139,841 | |||||||
Other short-term borrowings | 415,858 | 315,125 | |||||||
Subordinated debt | 272,236 | 123,641 | |||||||
Long-term debt | 193,938 | 208,417 | |||||||
Other liabilities | 93,050 | 142,591 | |||||||
Acceptances outstanding | 7,924 | 14,736 | |||||||
Total liabilities | 9,285,739 | 8,353,021 | |||||||
Commitments and contingencies | |||||||||
Shareholders' Equity | |||||||||
Preferred Stock authorized5,000,000: none outstanding | | | |||||||
Common Stock-par value-$1.00; authorized75,000,000; issued48,149,998 in 2001 and 47,785,345 shares in 2000 | 48,150 | 47,785 | |||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 301,022 | 292,358 | |||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | 10,674 | (11,493 | ) | ||||||
Retained earnings | 530,731 | 420,024 | |||||||
Treasury shares, at cost0 shares in 2001 and 155,355 shares in 2000 | | (5,026 | ) | ||||||
Total shareholders' equity | 890,577 | 743,648 | |||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity | $ | 10,176,316 | $ | 9,096,669 | |||||
See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
A-37
CITY NATIONAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
For the year ended December 31, |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts |
||||||||||||
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
||||||||||
Interest Income | ||||||||||||
Loans | $ | 517,891 | $ | 550,361 | $ | 399,891 | ||||||
Securities available-for-sale | 102,141 | 89,588 | 65,209 | |||||||||
Trading account | 1,918 | 3,530 | 2,965 | |||||||||
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements | 3,298 | 2,809 | 2,381 | |||||||||
Total interest income | 625,248 | 646,288 | 470,446 | |||||||||
Interest Expense | ||||||||||||
Deposits | 133,250 | 155,727 | 93,214 | |||||||||
Other short-term borrowings | 28,242 | 49,038 | 9,896 | |||||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements | 13,218 | 16,269 | 25,954 | |||||||||
Other long-term debt | 7,460 | 10,614 | 11,960 | |||||||||
Subordinated debt | 8,924 | 8,124 | 7,417 | |||||||||
Total interest expense | 191,094 | 239,772 | 148,441 | |||||||||
Net interest income | 434,154 | 406,516 | 322,005 | |||||||||
Provision for credit losses | 35,000 | 21,500 | | |||||||||
Net interest income after provision for credit losses | 399,154 | 385,016 | 322,005 | |||||||||
Noninterest Income | ||||||||||||
Trust fees and investment fee revenue | 58,596 | 47,279 | 37,822 | |||||||||
Cash management and deposit transaction charges | 30,911 | 22,933 | 18,113 | |||||||||
International services | 15,017 | 14,982 | 9,950 | |||||||||
Bank owned life insurance | 2,860 | 2,578 | 2,268 | |||||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of loans and assets/debt repurchase | 1,413 | (71 | ) | 2,117 | ||||||||
Gain on sale of securities | 3,342 | 3,132 | 3,696 | |||||||||
Other | 20,245 | 18,651 | 13,246 | |||||||||
Total noninterest income | 132,384 | 109,484 | 87,212 | |||||||||
Noninterest Expense | ||||||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits | 170,364 | 159,782 | 133,935 | |||||||||
Net occupancy of premises | 26,375 | 24,415 | 18,955 | |||||||||
Professional | 24,634 | 23,076 | 20,811 | |||||||||
Information services | 16,623 | 14,064 | 12,267 | |||||||||
Depreciation | 13,748 | 13,037 | 11,242 | |||||||||
Amortization of goodwill | 12,868 | 11,223 | 5,171 | |||||||||
Marketing and advertising | 12,093 | 12,959 | 10,444 | |||||||||
Office services | 9,396 | 9,724 | 8,212 | |||||||||
Amortization of core deposit intangibles | 5,618 | 5,444 | 4,138 | |||||||||
Equipment | 2,245 | 2,462 | 2,213 | |||||||||
Acquisition integration | | 1,309 | 1,161 | |||||||||
Other operating | 19,431 | 17,275 | 13,254 | |||||||||
Total noninterest expense | 313,395 | 294,770 | 241,803 | |||||||||
Income before income taxes | 218,143 | 199,730 | 167,414 | |||||||||
Income taxes | 71,973 | 68,070 | 59,307 | |||||||||
Net income | 146,170 | 131,660 | 108,107 | |||||||||
Other comprehensive income | ||||||||||||
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available-for-sale | 13,496 | 22,883 | (72,546 | ) | ||||||||
Initial gain on cash flow hedges from implementation of FAS 133 | 2,404 | | | |||||||||
Additional unrealized gain on cash flow hedges | 19,058 | | | |||||||||
Less: reclassification adjustment for losses included in income | (3,279 | ) | (4,205 | ) | (3,252 | ) | ||||||
Income taxes (benefits) | 16,070 | 11,388 | (29,200 | ) | ||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) | 22,167 | 15,700 | (40,094 | ) | ||||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 168,337 | $ | 147,360 | $ | 68,013 | ||||||
Net income per share, basic | $ | 3.05 | $ | 2.79 | $ | 2.37 | ||||||
Net income per share, diluted | $ | 2.96 | $ | 2.72 | $ | 2.30 | ||||||
Shares used to compute income per share, basic | 47,896 | 47,178 | 45,683 | |||||||||
Shares used to compute income per share, diluted | 49,376 | 48,393 | 46,938 | |||||||||
Dividends per share | $ | 0.74 | $ | 0.70 | $ | 0.66 | ||||||
See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
A-38
CITY NATIONAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
|
For the year ended December 31, |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dollars in thousands |
||||||||||||
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
||||||||||
Cash Flows From Operating Activities | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 146,170 | $ | 131,660 | $ | 108,107 | ||||||
Adjustments to net income: | ||||||||||||
Provision for credit losses | 35,000 | 21,500 | | |||||||||
Amortization of goodwill and core deposit intangibles | 18,486 | 16,667 | 9,309 | |||||||||
Depreciation | 13,748 | 13,037 | 11,242 | |||||||||
Deferred income tax (benefit) | 13,700 | 3,760 | (2,199 | ) | ||||||||
Gain on sales of ORE | (21 | ) | (38 | ) | (399 | ) | ||||||
(Gain) loss on sales of loans and assets / debt repurchase | (1,413 | ) | 71 | (2,117 | ) | |||||||
Gain on sales of securities | (3,342 | ) | (3,132 | ) | (3,696 | ) | ||||||
Net increase in other (assets) liabilities | (64,433 | ) | 5,156 | (35,599 | ) | |||||||
Net (increase) decrease in trading securities | (32,188 | ) | (18,364 | ) | 7,301 | |||||||
Other, net | 20,696 | 20,423 | 22,678 | |||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 146,403 | 190,740 | 114,627 | |||||||||
Cash Flows From Investing Activities | ||||||||||||
Purchase of securities | (1,403,757 | ) | (1,727,957 | ) | (407,722 | ) | ||||||
Sales of securities available-for-sale | 535,687 | 518,885 | 231,570 | |||||||||
Maturities of securities | 627,054 | 922,901 | 96,397 | |||||||||
Purchase of residential mortgage loans | (12,266 | ) | (25,280 | ) | (83,371 | ) | ||||||
Sales of loans | 59,690 | 162,037 | 41,357 | |||||||||
Loan originations net of principal collections | (721,902 | ) | (726,238 | ) | (682,061 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of ORE | 10 | 1,260 | 2,596 | |||||||||
Purchase of premises and equipment | (21,261 | ) | (15,302 | ) | (17,818 | ) | ||||||
Net cash from acquisitions | | 79,080 | 18,905 | |||||||||
Other, net | 12 | 11,174 | 592 | |||||||||
Net cash used by investing activities | (936,733 | ) | (799,440 | ) | (799,555 | ) | ||||||
Cash Flows From Financing Activities | ||||||||||||
Net increase in deposits | 722,532 | 1,037,568 | 366,329 | |||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of other long-term debt | 150,000 | 150,000 | 80,000 | |||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements | 31,690 | 44,354 | (180,824 | ) | ||||||||
Net (decrease) increase in short-term borrowings, net of transfers from long-term debt | (56,533 | ) | (281,614 | ) | 79,738 | |||||||
Repayment of long-term debt | | (25,000 | ) | | ||||||||
Repurchase of subordinated debt | (8,467 | ) | | | ||||||||
Net proceeds of subordinated debt | 148,202 | | | |||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | 14,967 | 7,285 | 8,193 | |||||||||
Stock repurchases | (5,394 | ) | (29,411 | ) | (39,001 | ) | ||||||
Cash dividends paid | (35,463 | ) | (32,846 | ) | (30,172 | ) | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 961,534 | 870,336 | 284,263 | |||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 171,204 | 261,636 | (400,665 | ) | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 551,814 | 290,178 | 690,843 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | $ | 723,018 | $ | 551,814 | $ | 290,178 | ||||||
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information: | ||||||||||||
Cash paid during the period for: | ||||||||||||
Interest | $ | 205,838 | $ | 228,086 | $ | 142,478 | ||||||
Income taxes | 82,700 | 11,621 | 54,400 | |||||||||
Non-cash investing activities: | ||||||||||||
Transfer from loans to foreclosed assets | $ | 162 | $ | 605 | $ | 1,331 | ||||||
Transfer from long-term debt to short-term borrowings | 165,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 |
See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
A-39
CITY NATIONAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Dollars in thousands |
Shares issued |
Common stock |
Additional paid-in capital |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
Retained earnings |
Treasury shares |
Total shareholders' equity |
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balances, December 31, 1998 | 46,885,182 | $ | 46,885 | $ | 287,363 | $ | 12,901 | $ | 243,275 | $ | (28,621 | ) | $ | 561,803 | |||||||
Net income | | | | | 108,107 | | 108,107 | ||||||||||||||
Issuance of shares for stock options exercised | | | (13,709 | ) | | | 21,902 | 8,193 | |||||||||||||
Tax benefit from stock options | | | 2,810 | | | | 2,810 | ||||||||||||||
Cash dividends | | | | | (30,172 | ) | | (30,172 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) net of tax benefit | | | | (40,094 | ) | | | (40,094 | ) | ||||||||||||
Repurchased shares, net | | | | | | (39,001 | ) | (39,001 | ) | ||||||||||||
Balances, December 31, 1999 | 46,885,182 | 46,885 | 276,464 | (27,193 | ) | 321,210 | (45,720 | ) | 571,646 | ||||||||||||
Net income | | | | | 131,660 | | 131,660 | ||||||||||||||
Issuance of shares for stock options exercised | 250,486 | 250 | 2,245 | | | 4,790 | 7,285 | ||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from stock options | | | 2,469 | | | | 2,469 | ||||||||||||||
Cash dividends | | | | | (32,846 | ) | | (32,846 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income net of tax | | | | 15,700 | | | 15,700 | ||||||||||||||
Repurchased shares, net | | | | | | (29,411 | ) | (29,411 | ) | ||||||||||||
Issuance of shares for acquisitions | 649,677 | 650 | 11,180 | | | 65,315 | 77,145 | ||||||||||||||
Balances, December 31, 2000 | 47,785,345 | 47,785 | 292,358 | (11,493 | ) | 420,024 | (5,026 | ) | 743,648 | ||||||||||||
Net income | | | | | 146,170 | | 146,170 | ||||||||||||||
Issuance of shares for stock options exercised | 364,653 | 365 | 4,182 | | | 10,420 | 14,967 | ||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from stock options | | | 4,482 | | | | 4,482 | ||||||||||||||
Cash dividends | | | | | (35,463 | ) | | (35,463 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income net of tax | | | | 22,167 | | | 22,167 | ||||||||||||||
Repurchased shares, net | | | | | | (5,394 | ) | (5,394 | ) | ||||||||||||
Balances, December 31, 2001 | 48,149,998 | $ | 48,150 | $ | 301,022 | $ | 10,674 | $ | 530,731 | $ | | $ | 890,577 | ||||||||
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
A-40
CITY NATIONAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The accounting and reporting policies of City National Corporation (the Corporation) and of City National Bank (the Bank) and their subsidiaries conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and to prevailing practices within the banking industry. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
City National Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company), through its primary subsidiary, the Bank, provide private and business banking, including investment and trust services, primarily in the California market. The Bank's principal client base comprises small- to mid-size businesses, entrepreneurs, professionals, and affluent individuals. The Bank typically serves clients through relationship banking. The Bank seeks to build client relationships with a high level of personal service and tailored products through private and commercial banking teams, product specialists and investment advisors to facilitate the client, where appropriate for the client, to use multiple services and products offered by the Company. The Company offers a broad range of loans, deposit, cash management, international banking, and other products and services. The Company lends, invests, and provides services in accordance with its Community Reinvestment Act commitment. Through City National Investments, a division of the Bank and Reed, Conner and Birdwell, LLC., a subsidiary of the Corporation, the Company offers personal and employee benefit trust and estate services, including 401(k) and defined benefit plans, manages investments for clients, and engages in securities sales and trading. The Bank also manages and offers mutual funds under the name of CNI Charter Funds.
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements of the Corporation include the accounts of the Corporation, its non-bank subsidiaries, the Bank, and the Bank's wholly owned subsidiaries after elimination of all material inter-company transactions. Certain prior years' data have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.
The Corporation is on the accrual basis of accounting for income and expenses. In accordance with the usual practice of banks, assets and liabilities of individual trust, agency and fiduciary funds have not been included in the financial statements.
Securities
All securities other than trading securities are classified as available-for-sale and are valued at fair value. Trading securities are valued at market value with any unrealized gains or losses included in income. Unrealized gains or losses on securities available-for-sale are excluded from net income but are included in comprehensive income net of taxes. Premiums or discounts on securities available-for-sale are amortized or accreted into income using the interest method. Realized gains or losses on sales of securities available-for-sale are recorded using the specific identification method.
Investment fee revenue consists of fees, commissions and markups on securities transactions with clients and money market mutual fund fees.
A-41
Loans
Loans are generally carried at principal amounts less net deferred loan fees. Net deferred loan fees include deferred unamortized fees less direct incremental loan origination costs. Interest income is accrued as earned. Net deferred fees are accreted into interest income using the interest method.
Loans are placed on nonaccrual status when a loan becomes 90 days past due as to interest or principal unless the loan is both well secured and in process of collection. Loans are also placed on nonaccrual status when the full collection of interest or principal becomes uncertain. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, the accrued and unpaid interest receivable is reversed and the accretion of deferred loan fees is ceased. Thereafter, interest collected on the loan is accounted for on the cash collection or cost recovery method until qualifying for return to accrual status. Generally, a loan may be returned to accrual status when all delinquent principal and interest are brought current in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement and certain performance criteria have been met.
The Corporation considers a loan to be impaired when it is probable that it will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Once a loan is determined to be impaired, the impairment is measured based on the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate, except that as a practical expedient, the impairment is measured by using the loan's observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.
When the measurement of the impaired loan is less than the recorded amount of the loan, an impairment is recognized by creating a valuation allowance with a corresponding charge to the allowance for credit losses or by adjusting an existing valuation allowance for the impaired loan with a corresponding charge or credit to the allowance for credit losses.
The Corporation's policy is to record cash receipts received on impaired loans first as reductions to principal and then to interest income.
Allowance for Credit Losses
The provision for credit losses charged to operations reflects management's judgment of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses and is determined through quarterly analytical reviews of the loan portfolio, problem loans and consideration of such other factors as the Company's loan loss experience, trends in problem loans, concentrations of credit risk, and current economic conditions, as well as the results of the Company's ongoing credit examination process and that of its regulators.
Venture Capital Investments
Venture capital investments are carried at the lower of cost or market and are included in other assets.
Premises and Equipment
Bank premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is computed generally on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of each type of asset. Gains and losses on dispositions are reflected in current operations. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operating expenses.
A-42
Other Real Estate (ORE)
Other real estate is comprised of real estate acquired in satisfaction of loans. Properties acquired by foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure are transferred to ORE and are recorded at fair value less estimated costs to sell, at the date of transfer of the property. The fair value of the ORE property is based upon a current appraisal. Losses that result from the ongoing periodic valuation of these properties are charged against ORE expense in the period in which they are identified. Expenses for holding costs are charged to operations as incurred.
Income Taxes
The Corporation files a consolidated federal income tax return and a combined state income tax return. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of existing differences between financial reporting and tax reporting basis of assets and liabilities, as well as for operating losses and tax credit carry forwards, using enacted tax laws and rates. Deferred tax assets will be reduced through a valuation allowance whenever it becomes more likely than not that all, or some portion, will be realized. Deferred income taxes (benefits) represents the net change in the deferred tax asset or liability balance during the year. This amount, together with income taxes currently payable or refundable in the current year, represents the total income taxes (benefits) for the year.
Net Income Per Share
Basic earnings per share is based on the weighted average shares of common stock. Diluted earnings per share gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares that were outstanding during part or all of the year.
Goodwill and Core Deposit Intangibles
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of net assets associated with acquisition transactions of the Company accounted for as purchases and is amortized over fifteen years. Core deposit intangibles represent the intangible value of depositor relationships resulting from deposit liabilities assumed in acquisitions and are amortized over seven years. Goodwill and core deposit intangibles are evaluated periodically for other than temporary impairment. Should such an assessment indicate that the undiscounted value of an intangible may be impaired, the net book value of the intangible would be written down to net estimated recoverable value. The carrying value of goodwill is net of accumulated amortization of $34.4 million and $21.5 million at December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000, respectively. The carrying value of core deposit intangibles is net of accumulated amortization of $20.8 million and $15.2 million at December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000, respectively.
Interest Rate Risk Management Activities
On January 1, 2001, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," as amended (SFAS No. 133). SFAS No. 133 requires that all derivatives be recorded on the balance sheet at their fair value. The treatment of changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the character of the transaction.
A-43
For fair value hedges, in which derivatives hedge the fair value of assets and liabilities, changes in the fair value of derivatives will be reflected in current earnings, together with changes in the fair value of the related hedged item. For effective cash flow hedges, in which derivative hedge the variability of cash flows related to floating rate assets, liabilities or forecasted transactions, changes in the derivatives fair value will not be included in current earnings but will be reported as other comprehensive income. These changes in fair value will be included in earnings of future periods when earnings will be affected by the variability of the hedged cash flows. To the extent these derivatives are not effective, changes in their fair values will be immediately included in current earnings.
Prior to January 1, 2001, for those interest rate instruments that alter the repricing characteristics of assets or liabilities, the net differential to be paid or received on the instrument was treated as an adjustment to the yield on the underlying assets or liabilities (the accrual method). To qualify for the accrual method, the interest rate instrument must have been designated to specific assets or liabilities or pools of assets or liabilities, and must be effective at altering the interest rate characteristics of the related assets or liabilities. See "Note 14. Derivative Financial Instruments."
Stock Option Plans
Compensation expense is recorded on the date of grant only if the current market price of the underlying stock exceeded the exercise price. As a practice, the Corporation's stock option grants are such that the exercise price equals the current market price of the common stock and there is no compensation expense. Proforma net income and proforma net income per share disclosures for employee stock option grants are based on recognizing expense, over the vesting period, the fair value on the date of grant of all stock-based awards made in 1996 and subsequent years.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2001, the FASB issued Statement No. 141, Business Combinations, and Statement No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Statement 141 requires that the purchase method of accounting be used for all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 as well as purchase method business combinations completed after June 30, 2001. Statement 141 also specifies criteria that intangible assets acquired in a purchase method business combination must meet to be recognized and reported apart from goodwill, noting that any purchase price allocable to an assembled workforce may not be accounted for separately. Statement 142 will require that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives no longer be amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least annually in accordance with the provisions of Statement 142. Statement 142 will also require that intangible assets with definite useful lives be amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values, and reviewed for impairment in accordance with Statement No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment of and Disposal of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of.
The Company was required to adopt the provisions of Statement 141 immediately and Statement 142 effective January 1, 2002. Furthermore, any goodwill and any intangible asset determined to have an indefinite useful life that are acquired in a purchase business combination completed after June 30, 2001 will not be amortized, and continued to be evaluated for impairment in accordance with the appropriate pre-Statement 142 accounting literature. Goodwill and intangible assets acquired in business combinations completed before July 1, 2001 will continue to be amortized prior to the adoption of Statement 142.
A-44
Statement 141 will require upon adoption of Statement 142, that the Company evaluate its existing intangible assets and goodwill that were acquired in a prior purchase business combination, and to make any necessary reclassifications in order to conform with the new criteria in Statement 141 for recognition apart from goodwill. Upon adoption of Statement 142, the Company was required to reassess the useful lives and residual values of all intangible assets acquired in purchase business combinations, and will be required to make any necessary amortization period adjustments by the end of the first interim period after adoption. In addition, to the extent an intangible asset is identified as having an indefinite useful life, the Company will be required to test the intangible asset for impairment in accordance with the provisions of Statement 142. Any impairment loss will be measured as of the date of adoption and recognized as the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle in the first interim period.
In connection with the transitional goodwill impairment evaluation, Statement 142 will require the Company to perform an assessment of whether there is an indication that goodwill is impaired as of the date of adoption. To accomplish this the Company must identify its reporting units and determine the carrying value of each reporting unit by assigning the assets and liabilities, including the existing goodwill and intangible assets, to those reporting units as of the date of adoption. The Company will then have up to six months from the date of adoption to determine the fair value of each reporting unit and compare it to the reporting unit's carrying amount. To the extent a reporting unit's carrying amount exceeds its fair value, an indication exists that the reporting unit's goodwill may be impaired and the Company must perform the second step of the transitional impairment test. In the second step, the Company must compare the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill, determined by allocating the reporting unit's fair value to all of its asset (recognized and unrecognized) and liabilities in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation in accordance with Statement 141, to its carrying amount, both of which would be measured as of the date of adoption. This second step is required to be completed as soon as possible, but no later than the end of the year of adoption. Any transitional impairment loss will be recognized as the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle in earnings.
As of the date of adoption, the Company had unamortized goodwill in the amount of $158.8 million and unamortized identifiable intangible assets in the amount of $18.5 million all of which will be subject to the transition provisions of Statements 141 and 142. Amortization expense related to goodwill was $12.9 million and $11.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000, respectively. Other than the elimination of goodwill amortization, management does not expect that adopting Statement 142 will have an effect on the Company's financial statements.
In June 2001, the FASB issued Statement No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations," which requires that the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation be recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset retirement costs would be capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset and depreciated over the life of the asset. The liability is accreted at the end of each period through charges to operating expense. If the obligation is settled for other than the carrying amount of the liability, the Company will recognize a gain or loss on settlement. The provisions of Statement 143 are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. Management has not yet determined the impact, if any, of adoption of Statement 143.
A-45
In August 2001, the FASB issued Statement No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets." For long-lived assets to be held and used, Statement 144 retains the requirements to (a) recognize an impairment loss only if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable from its undiscounted cash flows and (b) measure an impairment loss as the difference between the carrying amount and fair value. Further, Statement 144 eliminates the requirement to allocate goodwill to long-lived assets to be tested for impairment, describes a probability-weighted cash flow estimation approach to deal with situations in which alternative courses of action to recover the carrying amount of a long-lived asset are under consideration or a range is estimated for the amount of possible future cash flows, and establishes a "primary-asset" approach to determine the cash flow estimation period. For long-lived assets to be disposed of other than by sale (e.g., assets abandoned, exchanged or distributed to owners in a spinoff), Statement No. 144 requires that such assets be considered held and used until disposed of. Further, an impairment loss should be recognized at the date an asset is exchanged for a similar productive asset or distributed to owners in a spinoff if the carrying amount exceeds its fair value. For long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale, Statement 144 retains the requirement to measure a long-lived asset classified as held for sale at the lower of its carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell and to cease depreciation. Discontinued operations would no longer be measured on a net realizable value basis, and future operating losses would no longer be recognized before they occur. Statement 144 broadens the presentation of discontinued operations to include a component of an entity, establishes criteria to determine when a long-lived asset is held for sale, prohibits retroactive reclassification of the asset as held for sale at the balance sheet date if the criteria are met after the balance sheet date but before issuance of the financial statements, and provides accounting guidance for the reclassification of an asset from "held for sale" to "held and used." The provisions of Statement 144 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. Management has not yet determined the impact, if any, of adoption of Statement 144.
Note 2. Acquisitions
On December 29, 2000, the Corporation completed the acquisition of Reed, Conner & Birdwell, Inc. ("RCB"), an investment management firm with $1.1 billion in total client assets under management on the date of acquisition. Total consideration was valued at $15.4 million and includes equity participation notes payable to the sellers in 2003 and 2005. This acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting and resulted in the recording of goodwill of $14.3 million.
On February 29, 2000, the Corporation completed its acquisition of The Pacific Bank, N..A. (Pacific Bank). The Corporation paid consideration equal to $145.2 million (including the consideration for stock options), 47.0% of which was paid in the Corporation's common stock and 53.0% of which was paid in cash. The transaction was accounted under the purchase method of accounting and resulted in the recording of goodwill and core deposit intangibles of $70.9 million. Included in goodwill as purchase price adjustments were $4.3 million of accrued severance and change of control costs, $1.3 million of paid transaction related expense and $3.2 million of exit costs of which approximately $1.8 million remain unpaid as of December 31, 2001. The results of Pacific Bank's operations are included in those reported by the Company beginning March 1, 2000.
On August 27, 1999, the Bank completed its acquisition of American Pacific State Bank (APSB). The total price was $90.4 million in an all cash transaction. This acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting and resulted in the recording of goodwill and core deposit intangibles of $62.8 million. Included in goodwill as purchase price adjustments were $1.2 million of
A-46
accrued severance costs, $0.5 million of paid transaction-related expenses and $1.5 million of exit costs all of which were paid as of December 31, 2001. The results of APSB's operations are included in those reported by the Company beginning on August 28, 1999.
Note 3. Securities Available-for-Sale
The following is a summary of amortized cost and estimated fair value for the major categories of securities available-for-sale:
Dollars in thousands |
Amortized Cost |
Gross Unrealized Gains |
Gross Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
December 31, 2001 | ||||||||||||||
U.S. Government and Federal agency | $ | 300,653 | $ | 5,693 | $ | 140 | $ | 306,206 | ||||||
Mortgage-backed | 1,070,670 | 9,564 | 4,701 | 1,075,533 | ||||||||||
State and Municipal | 187,519 | 3,199 | 517 | 190,201 | ||||||||||
Other debt securities | 31,924 | 33 | 1,691 | 30,266 | ||||||||||
Total debt securities | 1,590,766 | 18,489 | 7,049 | 1,602,206 | ||||||||||
Marketable equity securities | 220,124 | 2,375 | 9,866 | 212,633 | ||||||||||
Total securities | $ | 1,810,890 | $ | 20,864 | $ | 16,915 | $ | 1,814,839 | ||||||
December 31, 2000 | ||||||||||||||
U.S. Government and Federal agency | $ | 646,629 | $ | 2,326 | $ | 581 | $ | 648,374 | ||||||
Mortgage-backed | 438,667 | 3,257 | 4,703 | 437,221 | ||||||||||
State and Municipal | 158,983 | 1,852 | 696 | 160,139 | ||||||||||
Other debt securities | 165,489 | 30 | 14,606 | 150,913 | ||||||||||
Total debt securities | 1,409,768 | 7,465 | 20,586 | 1,396,647 | ||||||||||
Marketable equity securities | 157,908 | 2,077 | 8,788 | 151,197 | ||||||||||
Total securities | $ | 1,567,676 | $ | 9,542 | $ | 29,374 | $ | 1,547,844 | ||||||
Gross realized gains and losses related to the available-for-sale portfolios were $6,892,000 and $3,550,000 respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2001, $12,934,000 and $9,802,000, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2000 and $7,965,000 and $4,269,000, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 1999.
In accordance with regulatory requirements, included in marketable equity securities was Federal Reserve stock of $12.9 million as of December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000. Also, in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Home Loan Bank, stock in that institution in the amount of $26.5 million and $18.3 million as of December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000, respectively, was included in marketable equity securities. Holdings of these equity securities are valued at cost.
A-47
The following table provides the expected remaining maturities and yields (taxable-equivalent basis) of debt securities at December 31, 2001, by contractual maturity:
Debt Available-for-Sale Securities
|
One year or less |
Over 1 year thru 5 years |
Over 5 years thru 10 years |
Over 10 years |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dollars in thousands |
Amount |
% Yield |
Amount |
% Yield |
Amount |
% Yield |
Amount |
% Yield |
Amount |
% Yield |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government and federal agency | $ | 14,783 | 5.89 | $ | 192,029 | 5.27 | $ | 99,394 | 6.22 | $ | | | $ | 306,206 | 5.61 | |||||||||||
Mortgage-backed | | | 553 | 6.25 | 4,312 | 6.32 | 1,070,668 | 6.38 | 1,075,533 | 6.38 | ||||||||||||||||
State and Municipal | 13,760 | 6.87 | 60,106 | 6.68 | 103,132 | 6.75 | 13,203 | 6.81 | 190,201 | 6.74 | ||||||||||||||||
Other debt securities | | | | | 16,232 | 7.60 | 14,034 | 8.05 | 30,266 | 7.81 | ||||||||||||||||
Total debt securities | $ | 28,543 | 6.36 | $ | 252,688 | 5.61 | $ | 223,070 | 6.57 | $ | 1,097,905 | 6.41 | $ | 1,602,206 | 6.30 | |||||||||||
Amortized cost | $ | 28,075 | $ | 247,939 | $ | 220,774 | $ | 1,093,978 | $ | 1,590,766 | ||||||||||||||||
Securities available-for-sale totaling $384.9 million were pledged to secure trust funds, public deposits, or for other purposes required or permitted by law at December 31, 2001.
Note 4. Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses
The following is a summary of the major categories of loans:
|
December 31, |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dollars in thousands |
|||||||
2001 |
2000 |
||||||
Commercial | |||||||
Relationship | $ | 3,160,418 | $ | 3,056,464 | |||
Syndicated non-relationship | 86,902 | 191,789 | |||||
3,247,320 | 3,248,253 | ||||||
Real estate mortgage |
1,668,114 |
1,479,862 |
|||||
Residential first mortgage | 1,587,303 | 1,273,711 | |||||
Real estate construction | 586,066 | 452,301 | |||||
Installment | 70,403 | 73,018 | |||||
Total loans (net of unearned income and fees of $14,473 and $12,274 in 2001 and 2000) | $ | 7,159,206 | $ | 6,527,145 | |||
Syndicated non-relationship commercial loans are loans agented by others where the Company has limited direct access to the borrower and provides no other banking products or services. Relationship commercial loans are all other commercial loans where the Company has direct access to the borrower and, therefore, has the opportunity to provide the borrower with numerous other banking products or services such as cash management, international, brokerage and trust services.
In the normal course of business, the Bank has loans to officers and directors as well as loans to companies and individuals affiliated with or guaranteed by officers and directors of the Corporation and the Bank. These loans were made in the ordinary course of business at rates and terms no more favorable than those offered to other clients with a similar credit standing. The aggregate dollar
A-48
amounts of these loans were $4.9 million and $4.1 million at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. During 2001, new loans and advances totaled $3.1 million and repayments totaled $2.3 million. Interest income recognized on these loans amounted to $0.4 million, $0.2 million and $1.4 million during 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. At December 31, 2001, none of these loans were past due or on nonaccrual status. Based on analysis of information presently known to management about the loans to officers and directors and their affiliates, management believes all have the ability to comply with the present loan repayment terms.
Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest totaled $3.6 million, $5.9 million and $4.0 million at December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. There were no restructured loan balances at December 31, 2001. Restructured loans totaled $1.6 million and $3.1 million at December 31, 2000, and December 31, 1999, respectively.
The allowance for credit losses is a significant estimate that can and does change based on management's process in analyzing the loan portfolio and on management's assumptions about specific borrowers and applicable economic and environmental conditions, among other factors.
The following is a summary of activity in the allowance for credit losses:
Dollars in thousands |
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance, January 1 | $ | 135,435 | $ | 134,077 | $ | 135,339 | |||||
Allowance of acquired institutions | | 9,927 | 3,415 | ||||||||
Provision for credit losses | 35,000 | 21,500 | | ||||||||
Charge-offs | |||||||||||
Relationship loans | (30,767 | ) | (23,409 | ) | (11,435 | ) | |||||
Syndicated non-relationship loans | (11,812 | ) | (18,167 | ) | (8,093 | ) | |||||
(42,579 | ) | (41,576 | ) | (19,528 | ) | ||||||
Recoveries | |||||||||||
Relationship loans | 13,994 | 11,507 | 14,851 | ||||||||
Syndicated non-relationship loans | 1,012 | | | ||||||||
15,006 | 11,507 | 14,851 | |||||||||
Net charge offs | (27,573 | ) | (30,069 | ) | (4,677 | ) | |||||
Balance, December 31 | $ | 142,862 | $ | 135,435 | $ | 134,077 | |||||
The following is a summary of nonperforming loans and related interest foregone:
|
December 31, |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dollars in thousands |
|||||||||||
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
|||||||||
Nonaccrual loans | |||||||||||
Relationship loans | $ | 32,699 | $ | 38,974 | $ | 25,288 | |||||
Syndicated non-relationship loans | 5,864 | 23,012 | | ||||||||
$ | 38,563 | $ | 61,986 | $ | 25,288 | ||||||
Contractual interest due | $ | 7,263 | $ | 10,206 | $ | 3,814 | |||||
Interest collected and applied to principal | 6,132 | 5,749 | 3,692 | ||||||||
Net interest foregone | $ | 1,131 | $ | 4,457 | $ | 122 | |||||
A-49
At December 31, 2001, the Company had identified $29.2 million in impaired loans included in nonaccrual loans, $10.2 million of which had an allowance for credit losses of $2.6 million allocated to them. At December 31, 2000, there were $49.1 million of impaired loans included in nonaccrual loans, $3.2 million of which had an allowance for credit losses of $1.2 million allocated to them. The allowances represent the differences between the value of the collateral supporting the loans and their outstanding balances. For 2001, 2000 and 1999, the average balances of all impaired loans were $35.5 million, $32.0 million, and $2.5 million, respectively. During 2001, 2000 and 1999, no interest income was recognized on impaired loans until the book balances of these loans were paid off.
The Corporation has pledged $809.2 million of eligible residential first mortgages as collateral for its borrowing facility at the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco.
Note 5. Premises and Equipment
The following is a summary of data for the major categories of premises and equipment:
Dollars in thousands |
Cost |
Accumulated Depreciation And Amortization |
Carrying Value |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
December 31, 2001 | ||||||||||||
Premises, including land of $3,587 | $ | 64,509 | $ | 32,095 | $ | 32,414 | ||||||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment | 80,337 | 57,727 | 22,610 | |||||||||
Software | 24,787 | 13,397 | 11,390 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 169,633 | $ | 103,219 | $ | 66,414 | ||||||
December 31, 2000 | ||||||||||||
Premises, including land of $3,587 | $ | 56,389 | $ | 26,911 | $ | 29,478 | ||||||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment | 72,667 | 49,015 | 23,652 | |||||||||
Software | 18,407 | 8,527 | 9,880 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 147,463 | $ | 84,453 | $ | 63,010 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense was $13.7 million in 2001, $13.0 million in 2000 and $11.2 million in 1999. Net rental payments on operating leases included in net occupancy of premises in the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive income were $19.6 million in 2001, $15.4 million in 2000, and $12.0 million in 1999.
The future net minimum rental commitments were as follows at December 31, 2001:
Dollars in thousands |
Net Minimum Rental Commitments |
||
---|---|---|---|
2002 | $ | 19,175 | |
2003 | 15,813 | ||
2004 | 13,334 | ||
2005 | 11,294 | ||
2006 | 8,650 | ||
Thereafter | 19,630 | ||
$ | 87,896 | ||
A-50
A majority of the leases provide for the payment of taxes, maintenance, insurance and certain other expenses applicable to the leased premises. Many of the leases contain extension provisions and escalation clauses. The Bank paid $1.5 million in 2001, $1.4 million in 2000 and $1.2 million in 1999 for rent and operating expense pass throughs to a real estate partnership in which the Bank owns a 32% interest, and Mr. Bram Goldsmith, Chairman of the Board of the Corporation, indirectly owns a 14% interest.
The rental commitment amounts in the table above reflect the contractual obligations of the Company under all leases. Lease obligations in acquisitions have been adjusted to current market values through purchase accounting adjustments. The allowance thus created will be accreted over the terms of the leases and reduce the total expense recognized by the Company in its operating expenses. At December 31, 2001, the Company is contractually entitled to receive minimum future rentals of $8.6 million under non-cancelable sub-leases.
Note 6. Income Taxes
Income taxes (benefits) in the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive income includes the following amounts:
Dollars in thousands |
Current |
Deferred |
Total |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2001 | |||||||||||
Federal | $ | 48,208 | $ | 16,600 | $ | 64,808 | |||||
State | 10,065 | (2,900 | ) | 7,165 | |||||||
Total | $ | 58,273 | $ | 13,700 | $ | 71,973 | |||||
2000 | |||||||||||
Federal | $ | 51,760 | $ | 6,060 | $ | 57,820 | |||||
State | 12,550 | (2,300 | ) | 10,250 | |||||||
Total | $ | 64,310 | $ | 3,760 | $ | 68,070 | |||||
1999 | |||||||||||
Federal | $ | 46,649 | $ | (1,633 | ) | $ | 45,016 | ||||
State | 14,857 | (566 | ) | 14,291 | |||||||
Total | $ | 61,506 | $ | (2,199 | ) | $ | 59,307 | ||||
A-51
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 2001 and 2000 are presented below.
|
December, 31 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dollars in thousands |
||||||||
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||
Deferred tax assets: | ||||||||
Allowance for credit losses | $ | 48,984 | $ | 44,948 | ||||
Net operating loss carryforwards | 11,121 | 13,054 | ||||||
Accrued expenses | 6,427 | 8,076 | ||||||
State income taxes | 6,608 | 6,506 | ||||||
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities | | 8,338 | ||||||
Other | 7,888 | 1,935 | ||||||
Total gross deferred tax assets | 81,028 | 82,857 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities: |
||||||||
Unremitted earnings of subsidiary | 23,839 | | ||||||
Core deposit and other intangibles | 6,481 | 8,523 | ||||||
Unrealized gains on cash flow hedges | 6,078 | | ||||||
Leveraged leases | 1,250 | 2,262 | ||||||
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities | 1,661 | | ||||||
Deferred loan origination costs | 1,484 | 1,512 | ||||||
Other | 4,005 | 4,574 | ||||||
Total gross deferred tax liabilities | 44,798 | 16,871 | ||||||
Net deferred tax assets | $ | 36,230 | $ | 65,986 | ||||
Income taxes resulted in effective tax rates that differ from the statutory federal income tax rate for the following reasons:
|
Percent of Pretax Income (Loss) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
||||
Statutory rate | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | |
Net state income tax | 2.1 | 3.3 | 5.6 | ||||
Amortization of goodwill | 1.9 | 1.8 | 0.9 | ||||
Tax exempt income | (4.1 | ) | (3.5 | ) | (3.7 | ) | |
Affordable housing investments | (1.2 | ) | (1.7 | ) | (1.8 | ) | |
All other net | (0.7 | ) | (0.8 | ) | (0.6 | ) | |
Effective tax provision | 33.0 | % | 34.1 | % | 35.4 | % | |
The tax benefit of deductible temporary differences and net operating loss carry forwards are recorded as an asset to the extent that management assesses the utilization of such temporary differences and carry forwards to be "more likely than not." The realization of tax benefits of deductible temporary differences and carry forwards depends on whether the Company has sufficient
A-52
taxable income within the carry back and carry forward period permitted by the tax law to allow for utilization of the deductible amounts. As of any period end, the amount of the deferred tax asset that is considered realizable could be reduced if estimates of future taxable income are reduced.
The Company's current tax receivable was $9.5 million at December 31, 2001 and $1.3 million at December 31, 2000.
At December 31, 2001, federal net operating loss carry forwards acquired in the First Los Angeles Bank acquisition in 1995 totaled $29.2 million, of which $4.0 million will expire in 2009 and $25.2 million will expire in 2010. During 2000, the Company reversed its remaining valuation allowances of approximately $5.3 million including approximately $3.0 million which arose from the acquisition of First Los Angeles Bank.
Note 7. Retirement Plan
The Corporation has a profit sharing retirement plan with an Internal Revenue Code Section 401(k) feature covering eligible employees. Contributions are made on an annual basis into a trust fund and are allocated to the participants based on their salaries. The profit sharing contribution requirement is based on a percentage of annual operating income subject to a percentage of salary caps. For 2001, 2000 and 1999, the Company recorded total contributions expense of $11.5 million, $11.0 million and $9.1 million, respectively.
Eligible employees may contribute up to 15% of their salary, but not more than the maximum allowed under Internal Revenue Service regulations. The Company matched 50% of the first 6% of covered compensation. For 2001, 2000, and 1999, the Company's matching contribution included in the total contribution above was $2.1 million, $1.8 million and $1.7 million, respectively.
The Company does not provide for any post retirement employee benefits beyond the profit sharing retirement plan.
Note 8. Stock Option Plans
Under the City National Corporation 2001 Stock Option Plan, 1,058,275 shares of the Corporation's common shares that were reserved for grant of non qualified stock options were available to be granted as of December 31, 2001. Under the 1999 Omnibus Plan (the "1999 Omnibus Plan"), 1,364,255 shares of the Corporation's common stock that were reserved for grant of stock options were available to be granted as of December 31, 2001. Under the 1995 Omnibus Plan, 364,961 shares of the Corporation's common stock that were reserved for grant of stock options were available to be granted as of December 31, 2001. The Corporation's 1983 Stock Option Plan and 1985 Stock Option Plan have expired but options granted thereunder remain outstanding. Grants to employees are at prices at least equal to the market price of the Corporation's common stock on the effective date of the grant. Generally, in each succeeding year following the date of grant, 25% of the options become exercisable. After ten years from grant, all unexercised options will expire.
The per share weighted-average fair value of stock options granted during 2001, 2000 and 1999 was $14.24, $11.36 and $14.59 on the date of grant using the Black Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: 2001-expected dividend yield of 1.50%, volatility of 32.4%, risk-free interest rate of 4.98% and expected life of 7.5 years; 2000-expected dividend yield of 2.00%, volatility of 34.8%, risk-free interest rate of 6.37% and an expected life of 7.5 years; 1999-expected
A-53
dividend yield of 2.00%, volatility of 37.1%, risk-free interest rate of 5.20%, and an expected life of 7.5 years.
The Company applies APB Opinion No. 25 in accounting for the plans and, accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized for its stock options in the financial statements. Had the Company determined compensation cost based on the fair value at the grant date for its stock options under SFAS No. 123, the Company's proforma net income would have been reduced to the proforma amounts indicated below:
Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts |
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net income, as reported | $ | 146,170 | $ | 131,660 | $ | 108,107 | |||
Proforma net income | 138,537 | 125,078 | 101,686 | ||||||
Net income per share, basic, as reported | 3.05 | 2.79 | 2.37 | ||||||
Proforma net income per share, basic | 2.89 | 2.65 | 2.23 | ||||||
Net income per share, diluted, as reported | 2.96 | 2.72 | 2.30 | ||||||
Proforma Net income per share, diluted | 2.81 | 2.58 | 2.17 |
Pro forma net income reflects only options granted from 1996 to 2001. Therefore, the full impact of calculating compensation cost for stock options under SFAS No. 123 is not reflected in the proforma net income amounts presented above because compensation cost is reflected over the options' vesting period of generally four years and compensation cost for options granted prior to January 1, 1996 is not considered.
Following is a summary of the transactions under the stock option plans described above:
|
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shares in thousands |
Number of shares |
Weighted Average Option price |
Number of shares |
Weighted Average Option price |
Number of shares |
Weighted Average Option price |
|||||||||
Options outstanding, January 1 | 4,629 | $ | 27.52 | 4,097 | $ | 26.54 | 3,849 | $ | 22.07 | ||||||
Granted | 1,291 | 36.87 | 1,151 | 27.99 | 965 | 36.51 | |||||||||
Exercised | (665 | ) | 22.14 | (422 | ) | 16.73 | (632 | ) | 12.97 | ||||||
Canceled or expired | (124 | ) | 33.86 | (197 | ) | 31.81 | (85 | ) | 32.02 | ||||||
Options outstanding, December 31 | 5,131 | $ | 30.38 | 4,629 | $ | 27.52 | 4,097 | $ | 26.54 | ||||||
Exercisable | 2,558 | 2,405 | 1,978 | ||||||||||||
During 2001, the Corporation issued 300,455 treasury shares and 364,653 newly issued shares in connection with the exercise of stock options. In 2000, the Corporation issued 171,700 treasury shares and 250,486 newly issued shares in connection with the exercise of stock options. In 1999, the Corporation issued 632,065 treasury shares in connection with the exercise of stock options.
A-54
Information concerning currently outstanding and exercisable options at December 31, 2001 is as follows:
|
Options Outstanding |
Options Exercisable |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shares in thousands |
Number Outstanding |
Weighted Average Remaining Life (Yrs) |
Weighted Average Outstanding Price |
Number Exercisable |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
|||||||
Options issued at prices less than $13.99 per share | 752 | 3.62 | $ | 12.12 | 752 | $ | 12.12 | |||||
Options issued at prices between $14.00 and $29.99 per share | 1,232 | 7.11 | 26.17 | 544 | 25.01 | |||||||
Options issued at prices between $30.00 and $49.99 per share | 3,147 | 8.06 | 36.39 | 1,262 | 35.78 | |||||||
5,131 | 2,558 | |||||||||||
At December 31, 2001, nonqualified and incentive stock options covering 1,370,862 and 1,187,924 shares, respectively, of the Corporation's common stock were exercisable under the plans. At December 31, 2001, 2,787,491 shares were available for future grants.
In addition to the above, the Corporation's 1999 Omnibus Plan provides for the automatic annual grant, on the date of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, of a discounted stock option (which is not an Incentive Stock Option) to each non-employee director, including members of the Compensation and Directors Nominating Committee to purchase 500 shares of the Corporation's common stock ("Director Stock Options"). The exercise price of Director Stock Options is $1.00 per share, payable in cash or cash equivalents, by surrender of the Corporation's common stock held by the director for at least a year before exercise, or any combination of the two. Director Stock Options fully vest six months after the date of issuance or upon the termination of the holder's directorship (other than for cause), whichever is earlier, and expire 10 years after the date of grant.
Note 9. Deposits and Borrowed Funds
The following table sets forth the maturity distribution of time deposits.
Dollars in millions |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
After 2006 |
Total |
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Time deposits, $100,000 and over | $ | 1,319.3 | $ | 20.0 | $ | 1.5 | $ | 1.2 | $ | 2.2 | $ | 0.2 | $ | 1,344.4 | |||||||
Other Time Deposits | 209.1 | 11.5 | 4.2 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 0.1 | 229.6 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 1,528.4 | $ | 31.5 | $ | 5.7 | $ | 3.4 | $ | 4.7 | $ | 0.3 | $ | 1,574.0 | ||||||||
A-55
Details regarding federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements as well as other short-term borrowings follows.
|
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dollars in thousands |
Balances at year-end |
Average balance |
Average % rate |
Balances at year-end |
Average balance |
Average % rate |
Balances at year-end |
Average balance |
Average % rate |
|||||||||||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements | $ | 171,531 | $ | 326,889 | 4.04 | $ | 139,841 | $ | 264,013 | 6.16 | $ | 95,487 | $ | 232,350 | 4.74 | |||||||||
Other short-term borrowings | 415,858 | 660,840 | 4.27 | 315,125 | 752,751 | 6.51 | 496,724 | 472,341 | 5.26 |
Following is a summary of short term borrowings and other borrowed funds of the Company excluding overnight federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase.
|
December 31, |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dollars in thousands |
||||||||
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||
Other short-term borrowings: | ||||||||
Term federal funds purchased | $ | 75,000 | $ | 150,000 | ||||
Treasury, tax and loan note | 125 | 125 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances | 340,733 | 150,000 | ||||||
Other BorrowingRevolving Line of Credit | | 15,000 | ||||||
Total | $ | 415,858 | $ | 315,125 | ||||
Subordinated debt | $ | 272,236 | $ | 123,641 | ||||
Long-term debt: | ||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances | $ | 190,521 | $ | 205,000 | ||||
Equity participation notes | 3,417 | 3,417 | ||||||
Total | $ | 193,938 | $ | 208,417 | ||||
Short-term borrowings consist of funds with remaining maturities of one year or less, and long-term debt consists of borrowings with remaining maturities of greater than one year. The maximum amount of other short-term borrowings at any month-end was $890.1 million, $1,004.8 million and $621.4 million in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. In 1999, the Corporation established a $20.0 million revolving unsecured line of credit with another bank which was increased to $30.0 million in 2001. There were no funds borrowed on this facility as of December 31, 2001.
The maximum amount of securities sold under agreements to repurchase outstanding at any month-end was $36.0 million, $22.2 million and $74.2 million in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. The average amount of securities sold under agreements to repurchase was $8.7 million, $12.2 million and $19.9 million during 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. The securities underlying the agreements to repurchase remain under the Company's control.
On August 30, 2001, the Bank issued $150.0 million of 6.75%, ten-year, subordinated notes which qualifies as Tier II capital. The carrying value of the subordinated notes is net of market adjustments and issuance costs which are being amortized to interest expense to yield an effective interest rate of 6.92%.
On January 12, 1998, the Bank issued $125.0 million of 6.375% subordinated notes, due in 2008, in a private offering. These subordinated notes qualify as Tier II capital. The carrying value of the
A-56
subordinated notes is net of discount and issuance costs which are being amortized to interest expense to yield an effective interest rate of 6.62%.
Long-term Federal Home Loan Bank (the FHLB) advances outstanding as of December 31, 2001 (in thousands of dollars) mature as follows:
Dollars in thousands |
2003 |
2004 |
Total |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Borrowings | $ | 125,000 | $ | 65,521 | $ | 190,521 | ||||
Weighted interest rate | 2.11 | % | 2.77 | % | 2.34 | % |
The Bank had $128.3 million and $393.1 million of unused borrowing capacity from the FHLB at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
The equity participation notes arose from the acquisition of RCB and mature on December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2005. The notes accrue interest equal to 20% of the operating income of RCB through December 31, 2003 and 10% of the operating income of RCB for 2004 and 2005 as defined in the notes.
Note 10. Availability of Funds from Subsidiaries; Restrictions on Cash Balances; Capital
During 2001, the Bank formed and funded CN Real Estate Investment Corporation ("CN"), a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of the Bank which provides the Bank with flexibility in raising capital. As of December 31, 2001, the net income and assets of CN are eliminated in consolidation.
City National Bank contributed participation interest in loans with a book value of $1,555.1 million, net of reserves and $50.0 million in cash in exchange for 100% of the common stock of CN.
During 2001, CN sold 33,933 shares of 8.50% Series A Preferred Stock to accredited investors for $3.4 million. There were no dividends paid in 2001.
The Corporation is authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock. The Corporation's Board of Directors has the authority to issue the preferred stock in one or more series, and to fix the designations, rights, preferences, privileges, qualifications and restrictions, including dividend rights, conversion rights, voting rights, rights and terms of redemption, liquidation preferences and sinking fund terms.
Under a shareholders rights agreement (the "Agreement"), the Corporation distributed preferred stock purchase rights ("Rights") as a Rights dividend on March 13, 1997 at the rate of one Right for each share of the Corporation's common stock held as of the close of business on that date. The existence of the Rights makes it less likely that a person will acquire significant voting control of the Corporation's common stock or otherwise acquire the Corporation without the Board of Directors' consent. Until the Distribution Date, which is defined in the Agreement, (1) the Rights are not exercisable, (2) the Rights are attached to and trade only together with the Corporation's common stock, and (3) the stock certificates representing the Corporation's common stock also represent the attached Rights. Each share of the Corporation's common stock issued after March 13, 1997 and prior to the Distribution Date includes one Right. On the Distribution Date, the Rights will separate from the Corporation's common stock, Rights certificates will be issued, and the Rights will become
A-57
exercisable as described in the Agreement. The Rights expire on March 13, 2007, unless earlier redeemed or exchanged.
Historically, the majority of the funds for the payment of dividends by the Corporation have been obtained from the Bank. Under federal banking law, dividends declared by national banks in any calendar year may not, without the approval of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), exceed net profits (as defined), for that year combined with its retained net income for the preceding two calendar years. At December 31, 2001, the Bank could have declared dividends of $88.1 million without the approval of the OCC.
Federal banking law also prohibits the Corporation from borrowing from the Bank on less than a fully secured basis. At December 31, 2001 and 2000, the Corporation had borrowed from the Bank $37.1 million and $26.9 million, respectively, all of which was appropriately secured in compliance with regulatory requirements.
Federal Reserve Board regulations require that the Bank maintain certain minimum reserve balances. Cash balances maintained to meet reserve requirements are not available for use by the Bank or the Corporation. During 2001 and 2000, reserve balances averaged approximately $32.2 million and $28.5 million, respectively.
The Corporation and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory-and possibly additional discretionary-actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company's financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Corporation and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Corporation's and Bank's assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under the regulatory accounting practices. The Corporation's and the Bank's capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Corporation and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined). Management believes, as of December 31, 2001, the Corporation and the Bank meet and exceed all capital adequacy requirements to which either is subject.
As of December 31, 2001, the most recent notification from the OCC categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the following table. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the institution's category.
A-58
The Corporation's actual amounts and ratios are presented in the following table:
|
Actual |
Well Capitalized |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dollars in millions |
||||||||||||||
Amount |
Ratio |
Amount |
Ratio |
|||||||||||
As of December 2001 | ||||||||||||||
Total capital | ||||||||||||||
(to risk weighted assets) | $ | 1,059.6 | 14.08 | % | $ | 601.9 | >8.0 | % | ||||||
Tier 1 capital | ||||||||||||||
(to risk weighted assets) | 700.9 | 9.32 | % | 301.0 | >4.0 | % | ||||||||
Tier 1 capital | ||||||||||||||
(to average assets) | 700.9 | 7.26 | % | 386.1 | >4.0 | % | ||||||||
As of December 2000 | ||||||||||||||
Total capital | ||||||||||||||
(to risk weighted assets) | $ | 768.9 | 10.85 | % | $ | 567.1 | >8.0 | % | ||||||
Tier 1 capital | ||||||||||||||
(to risk weighted assets) | 555.5 | 7.84 | % | 283.5 | >4.0 | % | ||||||||
Tier 1 capital | ||||||||||||||
(to average assets) | 555.5 | 6.49 | % | 342.2 | >4.0 | % |
The Bank's actual amounts and ratios are presented in the following table:
|
Actual |
Well Capitalized |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dollars in millions |
||||||||||||||
Amount |
Ratio |
Amount |
Ratio |
|||||||||||
As of December 2001 | ||||||||||||||
Total capital | ||||||||||||||
(to risk weighted assets) | $ | 990.3 | 13.28 | % | $ | 596.7 | >8.0 | % | ||||||
Tier 1 capital | ||||||||||||||
(to risk weighted assets) | 632.4 | 8.48 | % | 298.3 | >4.0 | % | ||||||||
Tier 1 capital | ||||||||||||||
(to average assets) | 632.4 | 6.59 | % | 383.8 | >4.0 | % | ||||||||
As of December 2000 | ||||||||||||||
Total capital | ||||||||||||||
(to risk weighted assets) | $ | 745.7 | 10.57 | % | $ | 564.2 | >8.0 | % | ||||||
Tier 1 capital | ||||||||||||||
(to risk weighted assets) | 532.6 | 7.55 | % | 282.1 | >4.0 | % | ||||||||
Tier 1 capital | ||||||||||||||
(to average assets) | 532.6 | 6.23 | % | 341.7 | >4.0 | % |
A-59
Note 11. Commitments and Contingencies
In the normal course of business, the Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, letters of credit, and financial guarantees; and to invest in venture capital funds. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit, foreign exchange, and interest rate risk in excess of the amount reflected in the consolidated balance sheet.
Exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit, letters of credit and financial guarantees written is represented by the contractual notional amount of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a client as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since a portion of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Corporation evaluates each client's creditworthiness on a case by case basis.
The Company had outstanding loan commitments aggregating $2,933.1 million and $2,325.1 million at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively compared to outstanding loan balances of $7,159.2 million and $6,527.1 million, respectively. In addition, the Company had $315.4 million and $240.4 million outstanding in bankers' acceptances and letters of credit of which $267.5 million and $178.2 million relate to standby letters of credit at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Substantially all of the Company's loan commitments are on a variable rate basis and are comprised of real estate and commercial loan commitments.
The Company had venture capital fund commitments of $3.3 million of which $0.6 million and $0.3 million were funded as of December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000, respectively.
The Corporation or its subsidiaries are defendants in various pending lawsuits claiming substantial amounts. Based upon present knowledge, management including in-house counsel is of the opinion that the final outcome of such lawsuits will not have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Note 12. Disclosure about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value:
Cash and due from banks and Federal funds sold (Cash and Cash Equivalents)
For these short-term instruments, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Securities and trading account assets
For securities held as available-for-sale, fair value equals quoted market price, if available. If a quoted market price is not available, fair value is estimated using quoted market prices for similar securities. For trading account securities, fair values are based on quoted market prices or dealer quotes.
A-60
Loan receivables
For certain homogeneous categories of loans, such as some residential mortgages, and other consumer loans, fair value is estimated using dealer quotes, adjusted for differences in loan characteristics. The fair value of other types of loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities. In establishing the credit risk component of the fair value calculations for loans, the Company concluded that the allowance for credit losses represented a reasonable estimate of the credit risk component of the fair value of loans at December 31, 2001 and 2000.
Deposit liabilities
The fair value of demand and interest checking deposits, savings deposits, and certain money market accounts is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.
Short-term borrowings
For short-term borrowings, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Long-term debt
The fair value of long-term debt was estimated by discounting the future payments at current interest rates.
Commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit, and financial guarantees written
The fair value of commitments is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counter parties. The Company does not make fixed-rate loan commitments. The fair value of letters of guarantee and letters of credit is based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate them or otherwise settle the obligations with the counter parties at the reporting date.
Commitments to venture capital funds
The fair value of commitments to venture capital fund is based on the estimated cost to terminate them or otherwise settle the obligation.
Derivatives
The fair value of exchange traded derivatives is based on quoted market prices or dealer quotes. The fair value of non-exchange traded derivatives consists of net unrealized gains or losses, accrued interest receivable or payable and any premiums paid or received.
A-61
The estimated fair values of financial instruments of the Company are as follows:
|
December 31, 2001 |
December 31, 2000 |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dollars in millions |
Carrying Amount |
Fair Value |
Carrying Amount |
Fair Value |
||||||||||
Financial Assets: | ||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks | $ | 328.0 | $ | 328.0 | $ | 386.8 | $ | 386.8 | ||||||
Federal funds sold | 395.0 | 395.0 | 165.0 | 165.0 | ||||||||||
Securities available-for-sale | 1,814.8 | 1,814.8 | 1,547.8 | 1,547.8 | ||||||||||
Trading account assets | 78.3 | 78.3 | 46.1 | 46.1 | ||||||||||
Loans, net of allowance for credit losses | 7,016.3 | 7,058.4 | 6,391.7 | 6,391.8 | ||||||||||
Financial Liabilities |
||||||||||||||
Deposits | $ | 8,131.2 | $ | 8,136.5 | $ | 7,408.7 | $ | 7,410.3 | ||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under resale agreements | 171.5 | 171.5 | 139.8 | 139.8 | ||||||||||
Other short-term borrowings | 415.9 | 415.9 | 315.1 | 315.1 | ||||||||||
Subordinated and long-term debt | 466.2 | 498.9 | 332.1 | 335.1 | ||||||||||
Commitments to extend credit | (16.8 | ) | (16.8 | ) | (15.0 | ) | (15.0 | ) | ||||||
Commitments to venture capital funds | | 2.7 | | 3.0 | ||||||||||
Derivative contracts | 706.4 | (1) | 20.6 | (2) | 800.0 | (1) | 7.5 | (2) |
A-62
Note 13. Parent Corporation Only Condensed Financial Statements
Condensed parent Corporation financial statements, which include transactions with subsidiaries, follow:
|
December 31, |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dollars in thousands |
|||||||
2001 |
2000 |
||||||
Assets | |||||||
Cash | $ | 1,159 | $ | 560 | |||
Securities available-for-sale | 97,771 | 60,748 | |||||
Other assets | 3,203 | 1,737 | |||||
Investment in City National Bank | 808,365 | 706,549 | |||||
Investment in non-bank subsidiaries | 17,315 | 16,352 | |||||
Total assets | $ | 927,813 | $ | 785,946 | |||
Liabilities |
|||||||
Notes payable to City National Bank | $ | 37,057 | $ | 26,896 | |||
Note payable to other banks | | 15,000 | |||||
Other liabilities | 179 | 402 | |||||
Total liabilities | 37,236 | 42,298 | |||||
Shareholders' equity | 890,577 | 743,648 | |||||
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity | $ | 927,813 | $ | 785,946 | |||
A-63
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
For the year ended December 31, |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dollars in thousands |
||||||||||||
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
||||||||||
Income | ||||||||||||
Dividends from Bank and non-bank subsidiaries | $ | 65,367 | $ | 120,558 | $ | 59,044 | ||||||
Interest and dividend income | 4,188 | 2,220 | 1,296 | |||||||||
Gain on sale of securities | 188 | 3,079 | 3,509 | |||||||||
Total income | 69,743 | 125,857 | 63,849 | |||||||||
Interest on notes payable to Bank and non-affiliates | 2,255 | 3,055 | 767 | |||||||||
Other expenses | 895 | 746 | 634 | |||||||||
Total expenses | 3,150 | 3,801 | 1,401 | |||||||||
Income before taxes and equity in undistributed income of Bank and non-bank subsidiaries | 66,593 | 122,056 | 62,448 | |||||||||
Income taxes (benefit) | (503 | ) | (31 | ) | 1,127 | |||||||
Income before equity in undistributed income of Bank and non-bank subsidiaries | 67,096 | 122,087 | 61,321 | |||||||||
Equity in undistributed income of Bank and non-bank subsidiaries | 79,074 | 9,573 | 46,786 | |||||||||
Net income | 146,170 | 131,660 | 108,107 | |||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) | 22,167 | 15,700 | (40,094 | ) | ||||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 168,337 | $ | 147,360 | $ | 68,013 | ||||||
A-64
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
|
For the year ended December 31, |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dollars in thousands |
||||||||||||
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
||||||||||
Cash Flows From Operating Activities | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 146,170 | $ | 131,660 | $ | 108,107 | ||||||
Adjustments to net income: | ||||||||||||
Equity in undistributed income of Bank and non-bank subsidiaries | (79,074 | ) | (9,573 | ) | (46,786 | ) | ||||||
Other, net | 3,202 | 2,068 | (131 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 70,298 | 124,155 | 61,190 | |||||||||
Cash Flows From Investing Activities | ||||||||||||
Purchase of securities available-for-sale | (86,143 | ) | (38,462 | ) | (44,447 | ) | ||||||
Sales of securities available-for-sale | 47,279 | 25,513 | 24,685 | |||||||||
Investment in subsidiaries | | (72,564 | ) | | ||||||||
Other, net | | | 1,535 | |||||||||
Net cash used by investing activities | (38,864 | ) | (85,513 | ) | (18,227 | ) | ||||||
Cash Flows For Financing Activities | ||||||||||||
Cash dividends paid | (35,463 | ) | (32,846 | ) | (30,172 | ) | ||||||
Borrowings from City National Bank | 10,055 | 7,897 | 5,865 | |||||||||
Other short-term borrowings (repayments) | (15,000 | ) | 5,000 | 10,000 | ||||||||
Repurchase of treasury shares | (5,394 | ) | (29,411 | ) | (39,001 | ) | ||||||
Stock options exercised | 14,967 | 7,285 | 8,193 | |||||||||
Net cash used for financing activities | (30,835 | ) | (42,075 | ) | (45,115 | ) | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash | 599 | (3,433 | ) | (2,152 | ) | |||||||
Cash at beginning of year | 560 | 3,993 | 6,145 | |||||||||
Cash at end of year | $ | 1,159 | $ | 560 | $ | 3,993 | ||||||
Note 14. Derivative Financial Instruments
The following table presents the notional amount and fair value of interest rate risk management instruments:
|
December 31, |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2001 |
2000 |
||||||||||
Dollars in millions |
Notional Amount |
Fair Value |
Notional Amount |
Fair Value |
||||||||
Receive fixed/pay variable | $ | 706.4 | $ | 20.6 | $ | 800.0 | $ | 7.5 |
A-65
The Company uses interest rate swaps to mitigate risks associated with changes 1) to the fair value of certain fixed rate deposits and borrowings and 2) to certain cash flows related to future interest payments on variable rate loans. As of January 1, 2001, the Company had $800.0 million of notional amount of interest rate swaps which had a fair value of $7.5 million. Of the $800.0 million of interest rate swaps, $450.0 million were fair value hedges of various fixed rate deposits and borrowings and $350.0 million were cash flow hedges related to periodic future interest payments on specific portions of a $1.2 billion variable rate LIBOR based loan portfolio. The positive mark-to-market on the fair value hedges resulted in the recognition of other assets and an increase in the hedged deposits and borrowings of $5.1 million as of January 1, 2001. The positive mark-to market on the cash flow hedges of variable rate loans resulted in the recognition of other assets and comprehensive income of $2.4 million, before taxes of $1.0 million as of January 1, 2001. As of December 31, 2001, the Company had $706.4 million notional amount of interest rate swaps, of which $206.4 million were fair value hedges and $500 million were cash flow hedges. The positive mark-to-market on the fair value hedges resulted in the recognition of other assets of $9.6 million, other liabilities of $0.7 million and an increase in hedged deposits and borrowings of $8.9 million. In addition, deposits and borrowings included $1.8 million and comprehensive income included $2.8 million, before taxes of $1.2 million relating to interest rate swaps terminated with positive benefit during 2001. These amounts will be amortized into income over the designated hedged period. The positive mark-to-market on the cash flow hedges of variable rate loans resulted in the recognition of other assets and comprehensive income of $11.7 million, before taxes of $4.9 million. There was no transition adjustment at January 1, 2001 or any ineffectiveness gain or loss that impacted net income for 2001. Amounts to be paid or received on the cash flow hedge interest rate swaps will be reclassified into earnings upon receipt of interest payments on the underlying hedged loans, including amounts totaling $8.9 million, that was reclassified into net interest income during 2001. Comprehensive income expected to be reclassified into net interest income within the next 12 months is $13.2 million.
Interest rate swap agreements involve the exchange of fixed- and variable-rate interest payments based upon a notional principal amount and maturity date. The Company's interest rate risk management instruments had $20.6 million of credit risk exposure at December 31, 2001 and $7.5 million as of December 31, 2000. The credit exposure represents the cost to replace, on a present value basis and at current market rates, all profitable contracts outstanding at year end plus an "add-on" factor to reflect possible future market value volatility. The Company's swap agreements require the deposit of collateral to mitigate the amount of credit risk if certain market value thresholds are exceeded. As of December 31, 2001, the Company was holding $16.7 million in securities deposited by swap counterparties as collateral.
The periodic net settlement of interest rate risk management instruments is recorded as an adjustment to net interest income. These interest rate risk management instruments increased or (decreased) net interest income by $15.0 million, $(2.7) million and $3.5 million for 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
A-66
Note 15. Net Income Per Common Share
Basic and diluted net income per common share calculations follow:
|
For the year ended December 31, |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dollars in thousands, except for share amounts |
|||||||||||
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
|||||||||
Basic | |||||||||||
Net Income | $ | 146,170 | $ | 131,660 | $ | 108,107 | |||||
Average Common Shares Outstanding | 47,937 | 47,536 | 46,885 | ||||||||
Average Treasury Shares Outstanding | 41 | 358 | 1,202 | ||||||||
Net Average Common Shares Outstanding | 47,896 | 47,178 | 45,683 | ||||||||
Basic Earnings Per Share | $ | 3.05 | $ | 2.79 | $ | 2.37 | |||||
Diluted | |||||||||||
Net Income | $ | 146,170 | $ | 131,660 | $ | 108,107 | |||||
Average Common Shares Outstanding | 47,937 | 47,536 | 46,885 | ||||||||
Average Treasury Shares Outstanding | 41 | 358 | 1,202 | ||||||||
Net Average Common Shares Outstanding | 47,896 | 47,178 | 45,683 | ||||||||
Stock Option Dilution Adjustment | 1,480 | 1,215 | 1,255 | ||||||||
Shares Outstanding and Equivalents | 49,376 | 48,393 | 46,938 | ||||||||
Diluted Earnings Per Share | $ | 2.96 | $ | 2.72 | $ | 2.30 | |||||
Basic net income per common share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period.
Diluted net income per common share takes into consideration the dilution assuming the Corporation's outstanding stock options were converted or exercised into common shares. The average price of the Corporation's common stock for the period is used to determine the dilutive effect of outstanding stock options utilizing the treasury stock method.
A-67